Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

Commission file number 001-16265

LIME ENERGY CO.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (847) 437-1666

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:  None

Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is a well-know seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o  No x

Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o  No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x    No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes o    No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes o  No  x

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates was $42,183,710 based on the reported last sale price of common stock on June 30, 2009, which was the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.  For purposes of this computation, all executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders were deemed affiliates. Such a determination should not be construed as an admission that such executive officers, directors or 10% stockholders are affiliates.

As of March 19, 2010, there were 23,597,591 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value, of the registrant issued and outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to its 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed within 120 days after registrant’s fiscal year end of December 31, 2009, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K where indicated.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Information

This annual report contains “forward-looking” information within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, adopted pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 which reflect our current views with respect to, among other things, future events.  Statements that are not purely historical may be forward-looking. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “hope,” “intend,” “may,” “project,” “plan,”  “should,” “outlook,” “potential,” continues,” “future” and similar expressions, including when used in the negative.

Forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in these statements, including but not limited to those described under “Risk Factors,” as well as, among others, the following:

·              implementation of our operating and growth strategy;

·              the loss, or renewal on less favorable terms, of management contracts;

·              development of new, competitive energy efficiency services;

·              changes in federal and state regulations including those affecting energy efficiency tax credits and the energy efficiency industry;

·              a significant decrease in the cost of energy leading to a decrease in the demand for energy efficiency services;

·              our ability to consummate transactions and integrate newly acquired contracts into our operations; and

·              availability, terms and employment of capital.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable and achievable, such statements involve risks and uncertainties and no assurance can be given that the actual results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including matters described in this annual report, including the sections titled “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our financial statements and notes thereto.

Except as otherwise required by federal securities laws, we do not undertake any obligation to publicly update, review or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or any other reason.

1

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1.   Business.

Overview

We are a leading provider of integrated energy engineering, consulting and implementation solutions specializing in improving the energy efficiency of our clients’ facilities, thereby reducing their operating costs and carbon emissions.  We focus on two specific markets: the commercial and industrial market, and the public sector market, working primarily with energy service companies (“ESCOs”).  Our clients include commercial and industrial businesses, property owners and managers, utilities, and ESCOs serving U.S. government and educational institutions.  We focus on deploying solutions to reduce the energy-related expenditures of our clients’ facilities and the impact of their energy use on the environment, including energy efficient lighting upgrades, energy efficiency mechanical and electrical retrofit and upgrade services, water conservation, weatherization and renewable project development and implementation.  We provide energy efficiency solutions across all of our clients’ facilities, ranging from high-rise office buildings to manufacturing plants, retail sites, mixed use complexes and large, government sites to small, local facilities.

We believe the following factors continue to drive demand for energy efficiency services by facility owners in both the U.S. commercial and industrial and public sector markets:

·      the potential for immediate return on investment and demonstrable long-term cost savings resulting from the installation of energy efficient solutions;

·      concerns regarding the substantial and volatile cost of energy, the adverse implication of global climate change and the desire for energy independence;

·      increasing pressure on corporations to establish and attain sustainability goals;

·      increasing regulatory pressures on utilities to include energy efficiency and renewable energy in their resource plans;

·      the availability of rebates and tax incentives both at a federal and state level for organizations that reduce their energy consumption;

·      existing and prospective government mandates to improve the efficiency of federal facilities;

·      the allocation of funds under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”) to promote energy efficiency and alternative energy projects in federal, state and local municipal facilities; and

·      the migration towards a low-carbon economy which will potentially place a price or tax on the carbon emissions of our clients.

We offer our clients a full range of services to address the energy efficiency needs of their facilities based on our ability to identify and deliver significant return on our clients’ investments, improve the quality of their physical workspaces, maximize their operational savings and reduce their maintenance costs.  Our turnkey services include:

·      Energy Engineering and Consulting:  We apply our engineering expertise to analyze each client’s energy consumption and operational needs and develop customized energy efficiency and renewable energy solutions.  Our energy engineering and consulting services include sustainability consulting, energy master planning, project development services, design engineering and facility e-commissioning.  We also provide design review and analysis of new

2

Table of Contents

construction projects to maximize energy efficiency and sustainability, project management of energy-related construction, and processing and procurement of incentive and rebate applications.

·      Implementation:  We provide complete turnkey implementation services for a range of energy efficiency and renewable energy projects, including energy efficient lighting upgrades, energy efficiency mechanical and electrical retrofit and upgrade services, water conservation, weatherization and renewable project development and implementation, including solar, biomass and geothermal.  We consider factors such as current facility infrastructure, best available technologies, building environmental conditions, hours of operation, energy costs, available utility rebates and tax incentives, and installation, operation and maintenance costs of various efficiency alternatives.  Our professionals’ extensive knowledge in energy efficiency solutions enables us to apply the most appropriate, effective and proven technologies available in the marketplace.

We serve a wide range of commercial and industrial and public sector clients.  Our commercial and industrial clients include many Fortune 500 companies for which we provide our energy efficiency solutions directly, as well as utilities for which we manage energy efficiency portfolio projects. Our public sector clients include government agencies and educational institutions, which we serve both through our relationships with ESCOs and directly.  ESCOs are awarded project contracts with the public sector as prime contractors, and we provide energy efficiency expertise to develop and implement tailored solutions under these contracts.

History and Business Development

On December 5, 1997, we were formed as Electric City LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, for the purpose of marketing a line of lighting controllers (which we marketed under the EnergySaver name).  On June 5, 1998, we changed from a limited liability company into a corporation by merging Electric City LLC into Electric City Corp., a Delaware corporation. Trading in our common stock commenced on August 14, 1998 on the OTC Bulletin Board.

In June 2006 we established our Energy Efficiency Services business through the acquisition of Parke P.A.N.D.A. Corporation (“Parke”).  Parke is an energy services provider specializing in the design, engineering and installation of energy efficient lighting upgrades for commercial and industrial users.  We expanded this business through the acquisition of Kapadia Consulting, Inc. in September 2006.  Kapadia is an engineering firm that specializes in energy management consulting and energy efficient lighting upgrades for commercial and industrial users.  During 2007 we added to this segment through two small acquisitions and the opening of additional offices.

On September 13, 2006 we changed our name to Lime Energy Co. to reflect our new Energy Efficiency Services focus.

In December 2006 we discontinued the active marketing of our original product, EnergySaver, due to changes in lighting technology, which in our view limited the future market for the product.

On February 25, 2008, our stock began trading on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the trading symbol “LIME.”

In June 2008, we acquired Applied Energy Management, Inc. (“AEM”).  AEM provides energy engineering and consulting services and energy efficiency services similar to our existing energy efficiency lighting solutions.  In addition, it provides mechanical and electrical conservation services, water conservation services, building envelope weatherization and renewable energy solutions primarily for government and municipal facilities through its ESCO partners.

3

Table of Contents

In August 2009, we sold the assets of Maximum Performance Group, Inc. (“MPG”) which comprised our Energy Technology business.

Products and Services

Energy Consulting and Technical Services

The Energy Consulting and Technical Services business unit provides consulting, engineering and program management services for clients in the areas of energy efficiency, renewable energy and sustainability.  We utilize our technical expertise to help Lime’s clients meet their goals for energy use reduction, energy cost savings and carbon management.  Our clients are in a wide variety of sectors, including commercial, industrial, utilities, institutional and governmental.  Our services include:

·      Energy Project Development — our team of engineers are the first line in the development of turnkey design-build energy efficiency projects.  They conduct building energy audits, analysis of energy consumption data, and financial analysis of various energy conservation measures.

·      Energy Engineering — we perform energy audits of clients’ facilities including building modeling, alternative analysis and preliminary design.  Our deliverables include preliminary assessments, detailed audits and investment grade audits.

·      Consulting — we provide all of the planning and technical execution for our clients building portfolio, including solutions for energy procurement, energy usage, on-site generation and accessing incentives and grants for energy projects.  Services include retro-commissioning and LEED consulting.

·      Energy Master Planning — we are a single source solution to the myriad issues that our clients face in the areas of energy and sustainability.  Among other things, our energy master plans consider energy efficiency, renewable energy, energy procurement, carbon management, incentives, rebates and grants.  We help our clients to make sense of these diverse areas and develop a clear path for the low-carbon economy.

·      Utility Program Management — we provide utilities with a single point solution for delivering energy efficiency resources.  Our wide range of services include program design, program management, marketing & customer recruitment, auditing and installation of energy conservation measures.

Implementation

We provide in-house, turnkey implementation services to deliver our energy efficiency solutions to our clients. Historically, most of our engineering and consulting services work has resulted in repeat revenue from the same client in the form of implementation of multiple energy efficiency solutions, additional engineering work or expansion of the work to additional client facilities.  Our comprehensive suite of energy efficiency implementation services includes:

·      Lighting Upgrade Services. Our designs incorporate occupancy sensors, light harvesting, time clock controllers and IP addressable systems that facilitate control of individual fixtures for maximum energy savings.  As part of our services, we seek to determine the best lighting solutions for our clients or, in the case where our client is an energy service company, for their client to achieve targeted financial return metrics and technical specifications. These lighting solutions take into consideration factors such as light and heat level requirements, building environmental conditions, hours of operation, energy costs, available utility and tax incentives, as well as installation, operating and maintenance costs of various lighting. Based on these factors,

4

Table of Contents

we upgrade the existing lighting system with a new system, custom configured with components from third-party manufacturers.

·      Mechanical and Electrical Conservation Services.  Our mechanical and electrical conservation services include the development, design, analysis, implementation and commissioning of mechanical and electrical efficiency projects at our client’s facilities. Mechanical projects utilize technology to increase the efficiency of HVAC systems. Heating technologies decrease energy consumption through the use of steel and sectional boilers, and more efficient burners with dual fuel technologies to take advantage of fuel switching opportunities and economizers to reduce exhaust gas temperatures.  Cooling technologies provide more efficient water or air cooled chillers, air handling equipment, roof top units, split systems and packaged equipment.  Other mechanical projects include heat recovery, air compressor staging and upgrades.  Electrical projects involve motor replacements, variable frequency drives, automated control systems and power factor correction and require regional installation and technical support.

·      Water Conservation Services. Our water conservation services include the development, analysis, specification and installation of water reduction technologies into a client’s facility.  Technologies include dual flush toilets, waterless urinals, low flow aerators for sinks and shower heads and water reclamation.  In addition to reduced water costs, other benefits include lower sewer costs, domestic hot water expenses and carbon emissions from reduced water heating costs. Additionally, less waste reduces sewage treatment costs and environmental impact.

·      Weatherization Services. Our weatherization services optimize energy efficiency and reduce consumption by protecting the exterior and interior of facilities from sunlight, precipitation and wind.   Specific services we offer include sealing bypasses (cracks, gaps, holes), installing insulation, protecting pipes from corrosion and freezing, installing storm doors and windows and replacing old drafty doors and windows with low-energy, double-glazed windows.

·      Renewable Project Development and Implementation.  We have extensive in-house renewable expertise, including development of a biomass gasification plant.  We have also installed a new solar domestic hot water and photovoltaic system consisting of parabolic solar dishes, heat exchangers and a computerized solar dish tracking system, and we have recently completed a closed loop water/glycol geothermal heat pump system for a public housing development.  In each case we have worked closely with ESCOs to review the proposed technologies, analyze proposed system performance, design custom solutions and build to budget.

We believe we have a national presence in all the key states which have instituted mandates and initiatives to support facility energy efficiency projects.  We have approximately 400 employees in 22 offices across 13 states.  Our offices are staffed with professionals who have significant expertise in facility energy efficiency engineering and consulting and the implementation of a wide range of related technologies for both the commercial and industrial and the public sector markets.  We are able to maintain a highly scalable and leveragable platform by deploying our professional employees to work on projects in either market based on our work requirements and local end client needs.

Sales and Marketing

Commercial and Industrial

As of December 31, 2009, we employed a sales force comprised of 47 sales personnel operating out of 22 offices across the country.  Our sales force is organized into teams and is compensated based on the revenues generated by each team in addition to a base salary.  We actively pursue new talent and have been successful in hiring sales personnel with highly-relevant industry expertise as well as training sales personnel who are new to the industry.  Our sales force has experienced low turnover and we believe is positioned to handle our expected growth.

5

Table of Contents

We expect to continue to have significant new business opportunities with our existing clients and to generate business from new clients through a combination of referrals, trade shows and cold calls.  We employ a sophisticated proposal system combining proposal-generation software and a proprietary database based on our many years of experience in the energy efficiency business.

The extensive training and education of our sales force is a key to our success.  Our sales force attends national and regional meetings each year where they review our sales model and our senior engineering team provides details on the latest technologies available in the energy efficiency solutions market.  Our sales force receives regular updates on our expanded service offerings, the latest available rebate incentive projects and, where available, finance packages.

We have established a clearly defined sales approach designed to shorten sales cycles, increase closing rates and help forecast future sales.

In addition to our sales group, we employ three full-time and two part-time marketing personnel focusing on vertical market segments directly targeting our potential clients’ industries.

Public Sector

We work on public sector energy efficiency projects through our ESCO relationships.  Our sales and development efforts to the public sector are primarily focused on supporting and building relationships with the ESCOs.  We have positioned ourselves in the supply chain of most of the major ESCOs participating in public sector energy efficiency projects offering a comprehensive set of products and services to these companies.  The combination of energy engineering and consulting expertise and regional implementation capabilities has contributed to our recent growth in this sector.  We believe there are few competitors that can provide a comparable depth of energy efficiency solutions over the range of geographies required for public sector facilities.

National Sales

We have a dedicated national accounts team focused solely on developing relationships with our largest and most important current and prospective commercial and industrial and ESCO relationships.  This senior client relationship team ensures that existing projects are overseen appropriately and that opportunities with our current clients or with other prospective clients are identified and developed.

Clients

During 2009, Honeywell International, Inc. and Johnson Controls, Inc., both ESCOs, each accounted for approximately 15% of our consolidated 2009 revenue, while Honeywell and URS Corporation accounted for approximately 14% and 10% of our consolidated 2008 revenue, respectively.

Competition

Commercial and Industrial

The market for energy efficiency solutions is highly fragmented.  We face competition mainly from companies only offering a sub-set of our offerings, such as lighting or mechanical and electrical conservation services.  Most of these competitors are local businesses which are only able to offer services in the immediate area or have a limited specific vertical product expertise, such as lighting and lighting fixture manufacturers, lighting fixture distributors and providers of energy efficiency upgrades and maintenance.  We believe we are the only national provider of a full range of energy efficiency services consisting of energy engineering, consulting and implementation services.  Our extensive

6

Table of Contents

experience and track record, national scale, leadership in providing comprehensive best-of-breed technologies and services and our established base of clients creates significant barriers to entry, providing us with a significant advantage when competing for commercial and industrial clients.

Public Sector

The market for energy efficiency services for public sector facilities is primarily served by ESCOs, who enter into energy efficiency service contracts with public sector entities.  Once ESCOs have secured contracts, they often hire energy efficiency service providers to act as a subcontractor to help them design and/or implement specific services in relation to a given project.  We compete with other energy efficiency services providers to be the chosen partner for these ESCOs projects.  We believe that while historically ESCOs often considered small, local providers, increasingly ESCOs are looking to consolidate their relationships with a smaller group of preferred providers to act for them on a national scale across the full range of energy efficiency services.  We believe the competing energy efficiency partners who target ESCO work are primarily small, private players that lack our reputation, technical capabilities and national scale.

During 2009 we entered into our first direct contract with a government agency when we assumed the rights under a contract with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to act as one of three qualified contractors under its Facilities Repair and Renewal program (“FRR”).  Under this program we will bid as a design build general contractor to the Corps of Engineers.  Subsequent to this, we were awarded several contracts with the U.S. Post Office to perform energy efficiency upgrades on postal facilities on the east coast and in the southeast.  We believe that there will be other opportunities in the future to contract directly with the government and quasi-government agencies where the agency does not require the services of one of our ESCO partners.

Compliance with Environmental Laws

Our sale of products and services generally does not require compliance with federal, state or local environmental laws.  Our implementation services use licensed disposal firms to dispose of old lamps, lighting ballasts or other products that may contain heavy metals or other potential environmental hazards.

Intellectual Property

As of December 31, 2009, we had three registered trademarks or service marks.

Employees

As of March 15, 2010, we had 249 full time employees and 121 part time employees, of which 70 were management and corporate staff, 10 were engineers, 68 were engaged in sales and marketing and 222 were engaged in project management, product installation, customer support and field service.

7

Table of Contents

Item 1A.            Risk Factors.

Risks Related to our Business

We have a limited operating history under our current business model in a rapidly evolving market, which may make it difficult to evaluate our business and prospects, and may expose us to increased risks and uncertainties.

Our business has evolved substantially over time through organic growth and strategic acquisitions.  Our current business model has only been in operation since June 2006, when we launched our Energy Efficiency Services business. Accordingly, we have only a limited history of generating revenues under our current business model, and the future revenue potential of our current business model in the rapidly evolving energy efficiency solutions market is uncertain. As a result of our short operating history under our current business model, we have limited financial data that can be used to evaluate our business, strategies, performance and prospects or an investment in our common stock. Any evaluation of our business and our prospects must be considered in light of our limited operating history under our current business model and the risks and uncertainties encountered by companies with new business models. To address these risks and uncertainties, among other things, we must do the following:

·      maintain and expand our current relationships and develop new relationships with commercial and industrial businesses, property owners and managers, utilities, government agencies and energy service companies, or “ESCOs,” serving government and educational institutions;

·      maintain and enhance our existing energy efficiency solutions;

·      execute our business and marketing strategies successfully;

·      respond to competitive developments; and

·      attract, integrate, retain and motivate qualified personnel.

We may be unable to accomplish one or more of these objectives, which could cause our business to suffer and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, accomplishing many of these goals might be very expensive, which could adversely impact our operating results and financial condition. Additionally, any predictions about our future operating results may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer operating history under our current business model.

We have incurred significant operating losses since inception and may not achieve or sustain profitability in the future.

We have experienced losses and negative cash flow from operations since our inception and we currently have an accumulated deficit. We must increase sales while maintaining or improving our margins to operate profitably and sustain positive operating cash flows. We may be required to reduce the prices of our services in order to increase sales. If we reduce prices, we may not be able to reduce costs sufficiently to achieve acceptable profit margins. As we strive to grow our business, we have spent and expect to continue to spend significant funds for: (i) general corporate purposes, including working capital, marketing, recruiting and hiring additional personnel; and (ii) acquisitions. To the extent that our revenues do not increase as quickly as these costs and expenditures, our results of operations and liquidity will be adversely affected. If we experience slower than anticipated revenue growth or if the gross margins we earn on our sales are lower than expected or our operating expenses exceed our expectations, we may not achieve profitability in the future or if we achieve profitability in the future, we may not be able to sustain it.  As we grow, our working capital requirements are likely to increase.  We may need additional funds in the form of a bank working capital line to support this increased working capital.  If in

8

Table of Contents

the future we cannot obtain bank financing it could limit our ability to grow our business to the point that it is profitable on a consistent basis.

In addition, because of our negative cash flow, we have funded our operations through the issuance of common and preferred stock and debt. Our ability to continue to operate until our cash flow turns positive may depend on our ability to continue to raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or debt. If we are not successful in raising any needed additional funds, we might have to significantly scale back or delay our growth plans, or sell or shut down some of our businesses. Any reduction or delay in our growth plans could materially adversely affect our ability to compete in the marketplace, take advantage of business opportunities and develop or enhance our services and technologies, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The current widespread economic downturn and uncertainty and turmoil in the equity and credit markets could adversely impact our clients, diminish the demand for our services and products, and harm our operations and financial performance.

The energy efficiency solutions marketplace has experienced rapid evolution and growth, but the current economic recession has increased the reluctance of some of our commercial and industrial customers to invest in energy efficiency projects, even those that offer strong ROIs.  We are not sure if conditions in this market will worsen or improve during coming months or how customers will react as the economy begins to recover. The recession also may cause reductions or elimination of utility or government energy efficiency incentive programs used to partially fund the costs of customer projects. In addition, increased competition during the recession may result in lower sales, reduced likelihood of profitability, and diminished cash flow to us.

Further, the sales of our energy efficiency solutions are made on the basis of contracts that permit our customers to terminate the engagement prior to completion rather than long-term purchase commitments and consequently our clients may cancel, delay or otherwise modify their purchase commitments in response to economic pressures with little or no consequence to them and with little or no notice to us. Whether in response to an economic downturn affecting an industry or a client’s specific business including its bankruptcy or insolvency, any cancellation, delay or other modification in our clients’ orders could significantly reduce our revenue, impact our working capital, cause our operating results to fluctuate from period to period and make it more difficult for us to predict our revenue.

It is difficult for us to estimate our future quarterly operating results.

A significant portion of our revenue is seasonal. Historically, this seasonality has caused our revenue, operating income, net income and cash flow from operating activities to be lower in the first two quarters and higher in the last two quarters of each year. The concentration of earnings and cash flow in the fourth quarter is primarily due to our clients’ budget cycles.  Further, many of our clients purchase our energy efficiency solutions on the basis of cancellable short-term agreements for projects that can be completed in a matter of weeks rather than long-term purchase commitments.  Consequently, we do not have a constant and predictable stream of revenue from those clients.  Additionally, because a few large projects are often responsible for a significant portion of our revenue from public sector clients, the level of activity, initial project delays or gaps between projects have historically led to significant fluctuations of revenue on an irregular basis throughout the fiscal year.  As a result, we may be unable to forecast our revenue accurately, and a failure to meet our revenue or expense forecasts could have an immediate and negative impact on the market price of our common stock.

9

Table of Contents

We operate in a highly competitive industry and if we are unable to compete successfully our revenue and profitability will be adversely affected.

The energy efficiency solutions market is highly competitive, and we expect competition to increase and intensify as the energy efficiency solutions market continues to evolve. We face strong competition primarily from lighting and lighting fixture manufacturers, lighting fixture distributors, providers of energy efficiency lighting upgrades and maintenance, small regional providers of energy efficiency solutions and local electrical and mechanical contractors.  As we extend energy efficiency offerings that are currently available to our public sector clients to our commercial and industrial clients, we expect to face additional competition from providers of those services in the commercial and industrial market. We compete primarily on the basis of client service and support, quality and scope of services and products, cost of services and products, ability to service clients on a national level, name recognition and financial resources and performance track record for services provided.

In addition to our existing competitors, new competitors such as large national or multinational engineering and/or construction companies could enter our markets.  Many of these current and potential competitors are better capitalized than we are, have longer operating histories and strong existing client relationships, greater name recognition, and more extensive engineering and sales and marketing capabilities. Competitors could focus their substantial resources on developing a competing business model or energy efficiency solutions that may be potentially more attractive to clients than our products or services. In addition, we may face competition from other products or technologies that reduce demand for electricity. Our competitors may also offer energy efficiency solutions at reduced prices in order to improve their competitive positions. If our ESCO clients internally develop sufficient capabilities to perform their own work they may no longer outsource work to us.  Any of these competitive factors could make it more difficult for us to attract and retain clients, require us to lower our prices in order to remain competitive, and reduce our revenue and profitability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We may be unable to obtain sufficient bonding capacity to support certain service offerings.

A significant number of our public sector contracts require surety bonds to guarantee our performance and payment to our suppliers and subcontractors. Bonding capacity for construction projects has become increasingly difficult to obtain, and bonding companies are denying or restricting coverage to an increasing number of contractors.  Some sureties have required us to post collateral, guarantees, agreements of indemnity and letters of credit to secure the performance and surety bonds.  Our available collateral may be insufficient to support our increasing need for surety bonds, which could preclude us from being able to bid for certain contracts and successfully contract with certain customers. If we are unable to obtain surety bonds, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Our success is largely dependent upon the skills, experience and efforts of our senior management and our ability to attract and retain highly qualified engineers and other skilled personnel, and the loss of their services or our inability to attract and retain such personnel could have a material adverse effect on our ability to expand our business or to maintain profitable operations.

Our future success will depend largely on the skills, efforts, and motivation of our executive officers and other senior managers.  The loss of the service of executive officers and other senior managers or our inability to attract or retain other qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our ability to expand our business, implement our strategy or maintain profitable operations.

In addition, to execute our growth strategy and maintain our margins, we must attract and retain highly qualified engineers, other skilled personnel and an effective sales force that can accurately price our clients’ energy efficiency solution contracts. Competition for hiring these individuals is intense, especially with regard to engineers specializing in the energy efficiency solutions market. If we fail to

10

Table of Contents

attract and retain highly qualified engineers and other skilled personnel, our business and growth prospects could be materially adversely affected.

We depend upon a limited number of clients in any given period to generate a substantial portion of our revenue.

Historically, we did not have long-term contracts with our clients, and our dependence on individual key clients varied from period to period as a result of the significant size of some of our retrofit and multi-facility projects.  During 2009 two clients accounted for approximately 30% of our consolidated revenue, while in 2008, two clients accounted for approximately 25% of our consolidated revenue.  We expect utility program management and large retrofit projects to become a greater component of our total revenue in the near term. As a result, we may experience more client concentration in any given future period. The loss of, or substantial reduction in sales to, any of our significant clients could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition in any given future period.

Our public sector business depends on a limited number of ESCOs under contract by government and other public end-users.

A significant portion of our public sector business revenue is generated through our relationship with a limited number of ESCOs that provide energy efficiency services to government and other public end-users.  If for any reason government spending on energy efficiency services is reduced or postponed or government and other public end-users shift contracts to ESCOs with whom we do not have established relationships, this may have a significant negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.  Further, our public sector projects typically have long payment cycles that may impact our liquidity and which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in any given future period.

Failure of our subcontractors to properly and effectively perform their services in a timely manner could cause delays in the delivery of our energy efficiency solutions.

Our success depends on our ability to provide quality, reliable energy efficiency solutions in a timely manner, which in part requires the proper removal and installation of lighting, mechanical and electrical systems and other products by our contractors and subcontractors upon which we depend.   A significant portion of our energy efficiency solutions are installed by contractors or subcontractors.  Any delays, malfunctions, inefficiencies or interruptions in our energy efficiency solutions caused by improper installation could cause us to have difficulty retaining current clients and attracting new clients.  Such delays could also result in additional costs that could affect the profit margin of our projects.  In addition, our brand, reputation and growth could be negatively impacted.

If our information technology systems fail, or if we experience operation interruptions, then our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

The efficient operation of our business is dependent on our information technology systems. We rely on those systems generally to manage the day-to-day operation of our business, manage relationships with our clients and maintain our financial and accounting records. The failure of our information technology systems, our inability to successfully maintain and enhance our information technology systems, or any compromise of the integrity or security of the data we generate from our information technology systems, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, disrupt our business and make us unable, or severely limit our ability, to respond to client demands. In addition, our information technology systems are vulnerable to damage or interruption from:

11

Table of Contents

·                  earthquake, fire, flood and other natural disasters;

·                  employee or other theft;

·                  attacks by computer viruses or hackers;

·                  power outages; and

·                  computer systems, Internet, telecommunications or data network failure.

Any interruption of our information technology systems could result in decreased revenue, increased expenses, increased capital expenditures, client dissatisfaction and potential lawsuits, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

Product liability and personal injury claims could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We face exposure to product liability and personal injury claims in the event that our energy efficiency solutions fail to perform as expected or cause bodily injury or property damage.  Since the majority of our products use electricity, it is possible that the products we sell could result in injury, whether by product malfunctions, defects, improper installation or other causes. Particularly because the products we sell often incorporate new technologies or designs, we cannot predict whether or not product liability claims will be brought against us in the future or result in negative publicity about our business or materially adversely affect our client relations. Further, we face exposure to personal injury claims in the event that an individual is injured as a result of our negligence.   Moreover, we may not have adequate resources in the event of a successful claim against us. A successful product liability or personal injury claim against us that is not covered by insurance or is in excess of our available insurance limits could require us to make significant payments of damages which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our retrofitting process frequently involves responsibility for the removal and disposal of components containing hazardous materials and at times requires that our contractors or subcontractors work in hazardous conditions, either of which could give rise to a claim against us.

When we retrofit a client’s facility, we typically assume responsibility for removing and disposing of its existing lighting fixtures. Certain components of these fixtures typically contain trace amounts of mercury and other hazardous materials. Older components may also contain trace amounts of polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs. We utilize licensed and insured hazardous wastes disposal companies to dispose of such components. Failure to properly handle, remove or dispose of the components containing these hazardous materials in a safe, effective and lawful manner could give rise to liability for us, or could expose our workers or other persons to these hazardous materials, which could result in claims against us.  Further, our workers are sometimes required to work in hazardous environments that present a risk of serious personal injury which could result in claims against us.  A successful personal injury claim against us that is not covered by insurance or is in excess of our available insurance limits could require us to make significant payments of damages and could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

If we are unable to manage our anticipated revenue growth effectively, our operations and profitability could be adversely affected.

We intend to undertake a number of strategies in an effort to grow our revenue. If we are successful, our revenue growth may place significant strain on our limited resources. To properly manage any future revenue growth, we must continue to improve our management, operational, administrative, accounting and financial reporting systems and expand, train and manage our employee base, which may involve significant expenditures and increased operating costs. Due to our limited resources and experience, we may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our operations or recruit and

12

Table of Contents

adequately train additional qualified personnel. If we are unable to manage our anticipated revenue growth effectively, the quality of our client care may suffer, we may experience client dissatisfaction, reduced future revenue or increased warranty claims, and our expenses could substantially and disproportionately increase. Any of these circumstances could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our growth may be impaired and our current business may suffer if we do not successfully address risks associated with any future acquisitions that we may make.

Our future growth may depend, in part, upon our ability to successfully identify, acquire and operate other complementary businesses.  Any acquisition contemplated or completed by us may result in adverse short term effects on our reported results of operation; divert management’s attention; introduce risks associated with unanticipated problems or legal liabilities; cause the incurrence of additional debt; cause the issuance of additional equity; or introduce contingent liabilities and amortization expenses related to intangible assets, some or all of which could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

In addition, often an acquired company’s performance is largely dependent on a few key people, particularly in smaller companies.  If these key people leave the company, become less focused on the business or less motivated to make the business successful after the acquisition, the performance of the acquired company and our combined business may suffer.

Our ability to use our net operating loss carry forwards will be subject to additional limitation, which could potentially result in increased future tax liability.

Generally, a change of more than 50% in the ownership of a company’s stock, by value, over a three-year period constitutes an ownership change for U.S. federal income tax purposes. An ownership change may limit a company’s ability to use its net operating loss carry forwards attributable to the period prior to such change. We have sold or otherwise issued shares of our common stock in various transactions sufficient to constitute an ownership change, including our recently completed public offering and the conversion of our outstanding preferred stock and the conversion of all of our outstanding convertible notes.  As a result, if we earn net taxable income, our ability to use our pre-change net operating loss carry forwards, which amounted to $88 million as of December 31, 2009, to offset U.S. federal taxable income will be subject to limitations, which will likely result in increased future tax liability.  In addition, future shifts in our ownership, including transactions in which we may engage, may cause additional ownership changes, which could have the effect of imposing additional limitations on our ability to use our pre-change net operating loss carry forwards.

13

Table of Contents

Risks Related to Ownership of our Common Stock

The future trading market for our common stock may not be active on a consistent basis and the market price of our common stock could be subject to significant fluctuations.

Trading in our common stock has been limited and, at times, volatile since our shares were listed on The NASDAQ Capital Market in February 2008.  The trading volume of our common stock in the future depends in part on our ability to increase our revenue and reduce or eliminate our operating losses.  If we are unable to achieve these goals, the trading market for our common stock may be negatively affected, which may make it difficult for you to sell your shares.  An active trading market for our common stock may not develop or, if developed, be sustained, and the trading price of our common stock may fluctuate substantially.

The price of our common stock may also fluctuate as a result of:

·                  variations in our operating results;

·                  announcements by us, our competitors or others of significant business developments, changes in client relationships, acquisitions or expansion plans;

·                  analysts’ earnings estimates, ratings and research reports;

·                  the depth and liquidity of the market for our common stock;

·                  speculation in the press;

·                  strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as sales promotions or acquisitions;

·                  actions by institutional and other stockholders;

·                  recruitment or departure of key personnel; or

·                  domestic and international economic factors and trends, some of which may be unrelated to our performance.

The stock markets, in general, periodically experience volatility that is sometimes unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies.  These broad market fluctuations may cause the trading price of our common stock to decline; in particular, you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the public offering price.

In the past, following a period of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been brought against a company.  Because of the potential volatility of our common stock price, we may become the target of securities litigation in the future.  Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources from our business.

Due to the concentration of holdings of our stock, a limited number of investors may be able to control matters requiring common stockholder approval or could cause our stock price to decline through future sales because they beneficially own a large percentage of our common stock.

There were 23,597,591 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 19, 2010, of which a total of 14 investors beneficially own in the aggregate approximately 68%.   As a result of their significant ownership, these investors may have the ability to exercise a controlling influence over our business and corporate actions requiring stockholder approval, including the election of our directors, a sale of substantially all of our assets, a merger between us and another entity or an amendment to our certificate of incorporation. This concentration of ownership could delay, defer or prevent a change of control and could adversely affect the price investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock. Also, in the event of a sale of our business, these investors could be able to seek to receive a control premium to the exclusion of other common stockholders.

14

Table of Contents

A significant percentage of the outstanding shares of our common stock, including the shares beneficially owned by these holders, can be sold in the public market from time to time, subject to limitations imposed by federal securities laws. The market price of our common stock could decline as a result of sales of a large number of our presently outstanding shares of common stock by these investors or other stockholders in the public market or due to the perception that these sales could occur. This could also make it more difficult for us to raise funds through future offerings of our equity securities or for you to sell your shares if you choose to do so.

The large concentration of our shares held by this small group of stockholders could result in increased volatility in our stock price due to the limited number of shares available in the market.

Raising additional capital or consummation of additional acquisitions through the issuance of equity or equity-linked securities could dilute your ownership interest.

We may find it necessary to raise capital again sometime in the future or to consummate additional acquisitions through the issuance of equity or equity-linked securities.  If we raise additional funds in the future through the issuance of equity securities or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders will likely experience dilution of their present equity ownership position and voting rights. Depending on the number of shares issued and the terms and conditions of the issuance, new equity securities could have rights, preferences, or privileges senior to those of our common stock.  Depending on the terms, common stock holders may not have approval rights with respect to such issuances.

Provisions of our charter and by-laws, in particular our “blank check” preferred stock, and in the Delaware General Corporation Law may prevent or discourage an acquisition of our Company that would benefit our stockholders.

Provisions of our charter and by-laws may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of our Company, even if a change-in-control would benefit our stockholders. In particular, shares of our preferred stock may be issued in the future without further stockholder approval and upon those terms and conditions, and having those rights, privileges and preferences, as our Board of Directors may determine. In the past, we have issued preferred stock with dividend and liquidation preferences over our common stock, and with certain approval rights not accorded to our common stock, and which was convertible into shares of our common stock at a price lower than the market price of our common stock.  The rights of the holders of our common stock will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any preferred stock we may issue in the future. The issuance of our preferred stock, while providing desirable flexibility in pursuing possible additional equity financings and other corporate purposes, could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us. This could limit the price that certain investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock and discourage these investors from acquiring a majority of our common stock. In addition, the price that future investors may be willing to pay for our common stock may be lower due to the conversion price and exercise price granted to investors in any such private financing.

In addition, as a Delaware corporation, we are subject to certain Delaware anti-takeover provisions, including the application of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which generally restricts our ability to engage in a business combination with any holder of 15% or more of our capital stock.  Our Board of Directors could rely on Delaware law to prevent or delay an acquisition of us.

Compliance with changing regulation of corporate governance and public disclosure may result in additional expenses.

Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules subsequently implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and The NASDAQ Stock Market, have imposed substantial requirements

15

Table of Contents

on public companies, including with respect to public disclosure, internal control, corporate governance practices and other matters. Our management and other personnel are devoting substantial amounts of time and resources to comply with these evolving laws, regulations and standards.  Moreover, these laws, regulations and standards have significantly increased our legal and financial compliance costs and have made some activities more time-consuming and costly.  In addition, we could incur significant costs to remediate any material weaknesses we identify through these efforts.  We currently are evaluating and monitoring development with respect to these evolving laws, regulations and standards, and cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.  These new regulatory requirements may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue generating activities to compliance activities, which could harm our business prospects and could have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.

We expect our quarterly revenue and operating results to fluctuate. If we fail to meet the expectations of market analysts or investors, the market price of our common stock could decline substantially, and we could become subject to securities litigation.

Our business is seasonal and can be affected by cyclical factors outside of our control.  In addition, we recognize revenue on many of our contracts once the project is substantially complete, resulting in intermittent periods of fluctuating revenue.  Our quarterly revenue and operating results have fluctuated in the past and are likely to continue to vary from quarter to quarter in the future. You should not rely upon the results of one quarter as an indication of our future performance. Our revenue and operating results may fall below the expectations of market analysts or investors in some future quarter or quarters. Our failure to meet these expectations could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.  In addition, these fluctuations may result in volatility in our results of operations and/or have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock. If the price of our common stock falls significantly we may be the target of securities litigation. If we become involved in this type of litigation, regardless of the outcome, we could incur substantial legal costs, management’s attention could be diverted from the operation of our business, and our reputation could be damaged, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and/or financial condition.

If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about our business or if they downgrade their evaluations of our stock, the price of our stock could decline.

The trading market for our common stock depends in part on the research and reports that industry or financial analysts publish about us or our business.  If one or more of the analysts covering us downgrade their estimates or evaluations of our stock, the price of our stock could decline.  If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our Company, we could lose visibility in the market for our stock, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not applicable.

16

Table of Contents

Item 2.    Properties.

Our headquarters are located at 1280 Landmeier Road in Elk Grove Village, Illinois. This facility is approximately 13,000 square feet and houses the corporate headquarters and a warehouse. We acquired this facility in August 1998. There is a mortgage on the building that matures in July 2011.

Other properties that are used for sales and administration include:

We believe that the space and location of our current facilities in combination with the current and planned outsourcing of our manufacturing will be sufficient for the level of sales and production projected for the current year.

17

Table of Contents

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, we have been a party to pending or threatened legal proceedings and arbitrations that are routine and incidental to our business. Based upon information presently available, and in light of legal and other defenses available to us, except as described in the following paragraph, management does not consider the liability from any threatened or pending litigation to be material.

In February 2009, a complaint captioned Byron Gonzales v. Lime Energy Co. and Parke Industries, LLC was filed against us in San Francisco Superior Court.  The complaint, as amended in March 2009, alleges that we failed to pay regular and overtime wages and to reimburse for necessary business expenditures such as tools.  These claims are asserted on behalf of Mr. Gonzales and a putative class of electrical installers and foreman employed by us in California.  We considered the litigation to be immaterial because of the scope of the claims and the defenses available to us.  During litigation in March 2010, plaintiffs indicated an intent to allege additional claims pertaining to a purported denial of meal periods.  While we vigorously deny the allegations, rather than engage in protracted litigation and incur substantial legal expenses and management time, we have agreed with the plaintiff to settle all class claims for $300,000, from which will be paid class counsel’s fees and costs. The settlement is subject to court approval and, if granted, expiration of the appeal period for objections.

PART II

Item 5.    Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Since February 25, 2008, our stock has traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the trading symbol “LIME.”   From September 22, 2006 until January 28, 2008, our common stock was traded under the symbol “LMEC” on the OTC Bulletin Board.  Trades on the OTC Bulletin Board reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.  Following a 1-for-7 reverse stock split on January 28, 2008, our trading symbol on the OTC Bulletin Board was “LMEG” until February 25, 2008 when our stock began trading on the NASDAQ Capital Market under its current trading symbol.

The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low selling prices for our common stock as reported on the Bulletin Board and NASDAQ since January 1, 2008, adjusted for our 1-for-15 reverse stock split effected on January 25, 2007, and our 1-for-7 reverse stock split effected on January 28, 2008.

Holders

As of March 19, 2010 we had approximately 558 holders of record, approximately 4,400 beneficial owners of our common stock and 23,597,591 shares of common stock outstanding.

18

Table of Contents

Dividends

No dividends were declared or paid during the three month period ended December 31, 2009.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

During the fourth quarter of 2009, we issued a consultant a warrant with a term of four years to purchase 5,000 shares of our common stock at $4.50 per share as partial consideration for services provided to us.

Also during the fourth quarter of 2009, we issued 12,566 shares of stock upon the exercise of options held by two individuals.

The sales and issuances of unregistered securities listed above were made by us in reliance upon the exemptions from registration provided under Sections 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

All other sales of unregistered securities in 2009 were previously disclosed in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q or Current Reports on Form 8-K.

Item 7.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements that are based on management’s current expectation, estimates, and projections about our business and operations. Our actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking statements as a result of numerous factors, including those we discuss under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report.

We have included a discussion of our acquisition of AEM in June 2008 in certain portions of the following discussion and analysis section in order to provide some detail on the impact that this transaction has had and that we expect that this transaction will have on our results of operations and liquidity and capital resource requirements. The unaudited pro forma financial and operational information included herein for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 have been presented as if the AEM acquisition occurred on January 1, 2008. Such unaudited pro forma information is presented for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of what our actual financial or operational results would have been had the AEM acquisition been consummated on such date.

Overview

General

We are a provider of integrated energy engineering, consulting and implementation solutions specializing in improving the energy efficiency of our clients’ facilities, reducing their operating costs and carbon emissions.  We perform energy efficiency engineering and consulting as well as the development and implementation of energy efficient lighting, mechanical, electrical, water, weatherization, and renewable energy solutions.

19

Table of Contents

We serve a wide range of commercial and industrial and public sector clients.  Our commercial and industrial clients include many Fortune 500 companies for which we provide our energy efficiency solutions directly, as well as utilities for which we manage energy efficiency portfolio projects. Our public sector clients include government agencies and educational institutions, which we serve both through our relationships with ESCOs and directly.  ESCOs are awarded project contracts with the public sector as prime contractors, and we provide energy efficiency expertise to develop and implement tailored solutions under these contracts.

Our revenue increased by $15.8 million, or 29%, to $70.8 million during 2009 from $55.0 million during 2008.  We have invested significant capital and resources to build our business infrastructure to provide us with the operational platform to support continued future growth.

The services we provide include:

·                  Engineering and Consulting: We apply our engineering expertise to analyze each client’s energy consumption and operational needs and develop customized energy efficiency solutions. Our energy engineering and consulting services include project development services, energy management planning, energy bill analysis, building energy audits and e-commissioning. We also provide design review and analysis of new construction projects to maximize energy efficiency and sustainability, project management of energy-related construction, and processing and procurement of incentive and rebate applications.

·                  Implementation: We provide a range of energy efficiency and conservation services, including energy efficient lighting upgrade services, mechanical and electrical conservation services, water conservation services, building envelope weatherization services and renewable energy solutions. Our objective is to improve the quality of our clients’ physical space, maximize their operational savings, capitalize on rebates available to them and reduce their maintenance costs.  We take into consideration factors such as infrastructure requirements, best available technologies, building environmental conditions, hours of operation, energy costs, available utility rebates and tax incentives, and installation, operation and maintenance costs of various efficiency alternatives.

In August 2009, we sold our Energy Technology segment through which we offered our patented line of HVAC and lighting controllers under the eMAC and uMAC brand names.  The eMAC technology provides remote monitoring, management and control of commercial rooftop HVAC units.  In early 2009 we decided to sell this division, which had incurred significant losses, to allow us to focus on our faster growing Energy Services business.  We came to agreement with a buyer in early August 2009 and closed on the sale on August 10, 2009.  This segment has been reported as discontinued operations in the accompanying financial statements.

Revenue and Expense Components

Revenue

We generate the majority of our revenue from the sale of our services and the products that we purchase and resell to our clients.

Revenue includes charges for our engineering, installation and/or project management services and the materials we purchase and resell to our customers.  The substantial majority of our revenue is derived from fixed-price contracts, although we occasionally bill on a time-and-materials basis.  Under fixed-price contracts, we bill our clients for each project once the project is completed or throughout the project as specified in the contract.  Under time-and-materials arrangements, we bill our clients on an hourly basis with material costs and other reimbursable expenses passed through and recognized as

20

Table of Contents

revenue.  The time it takes to complete our projects ranges from a couple of days for a small project to four to eight months for some of our larger projects.

Our revenues are somewhat seasonal with the strongest sales occurring in the second half of the year.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize our revenue when all four of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence has been received that an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery of the products and/or services has occurred; (iii) the selling price is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. In addition, we follow the provisions of the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition, which sets forth guidelines in the timing of revenue recognition based upon factors such as passage of title, installation, payments and client acceptance. Any amounts received prior to satisfying our revenue recognition criteria are recorded as deferred revenue.

We recognize revenue under either the completed contract method, for short term contracts, or the percentage of completion method for multi-month projects.  Under the completed contract method, revenue is recognized once the project is substantially complete, resulting in some variability in revenue.  Under the percentage of completion method we recognize revenue throughout the term of the project based on the percentage of costs incurred.  Under both methods of revenue recognition, any anticipated losses on contracts are charged to operations as soon as they are determinable.

Revenue Concentration

During 2009, Honeywell International, Inc. and Johnson Controls, Inc., both ESCOs, each accounted for approximately 15% of our consolidated 2009 revenue, while Honeywell and URS Corporation accounted for approximately 14% and 10% of our consolidated 2008 revenue, respectively.  We have relationships with large ESCOs that have historically provided repeat revenue and have represented a significant percentage of revenue in any given period.  We expect large ESCO projects to continue to be a significant component of our total revenue. In addition, in late 2009 we began serving as program managers to some utilities.  We expect these programs and others like them to be significant contributors to our revenue in future periods and one or more may grow to exceed 10% of our total revenue.  As a result, we may experience more client concentration in future periods than we have in the past.

Gross Profit

Gross profit equals our revenue less cost of sales.  Our cost of sales consists primarily of materials, our internal labor and the cost of subcontracted labor.

Gross profit is a key metric that we use to examine our performance.  Gross profit depends in part on the volume and mix of products and services that we sell during any given period.  A portion of our cost of sales, such as the cost of certain supervisory personnel, is relatively fixed.  Accordingly, an increase in the volume of sales will generally result in an increase to our gross profit margins since these fixed expenses are not expected to increase proportionately with sales.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense

Selling, general and administrative expense includes the following components:

·                  direct labor and commission costs related to our employee sales force;

·                  expenses related to our non-production management, supervisory and staff salaries and employee benefits, including the costs of stock-based compensation;

21

Table of Contents

·                  commission costs related to our independent sales representatives;

·                  costs related to insurance, travel and entertainment, office supplies and utilities;

·                  costs related to marketing and advertising our products;

·                  legal and accounting expenses; and

·                  costs related to administrative functions that serve to support our existing businesses, as well as to provide the infrastructure for future growth.

Amortization of Intangibles

When we acquire other companies we are required to allocate the purchase price between identifiable tangible and intangible assets, with any remaining value allocated to goodwill.  The value allocated to intangible assets is amortized over the estimated life of the related asset.  The acquisitions we completed within 2007, 2008 and 2009  resulted in approximately $8.3 million of intangible assets that are being amortized over periods ranging from 1 month to 20 years.  Approximately $2.7 million of these assets were determined to have indefinite lives and were not being amortized.  We determined during 2009 that this indefinite lived asset, which was comprised of the Parke trade name, was impaired due to our decision to operate all of our businesses under the Lime Energy name.  As a result, we incurred a one-time, $2.7 million non-cash impairment charge during the fourth quarter of 2009 when we reduced this intangible asset’s value to $0.  We recorded total amortization expense of $1.2 million, $1.6 million and $1.5 million in each of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.  Based on the value of the intangible assets we are currently carrying, we expect to record amortization expense of $589 thousand during 2010 and $613 thousand during 2011.

Interest Expense, Net

Net interest expense consists of interest expense net of interest income.  Net interest expense represents the interest costs associated with our subordinated convertible term notes (including amortization of the related debt discount and issuance costs), our lines of credit, the mortgage on our headquarters building, the our term notes and various vehicle loans.  All of this debt, with the exception of the mortgage and vehicle loans, was repaid or converted to common stock upon the completion of our public offering in September 2009.

Interest income includes earnings on our invested cash balances and amortization of the discount on our long-term receivables.

Preferred Stock Dividends

Preferred stock dividends represent the dividend expense associated with our convertible preferred stock.  All of the convertible preferred stock was converted into common stock in August 2009.

General Business Trends and Recent Developments

The trends, events, and uncertainties set out in this section have been identified as those we believe are reasonably likely to materially affect the comparison of historical operating results reported in this report to either other past period results or to future operating results. These trends, events and uncertainties include:

Recent Establishment and Expansion of Energy Efficiency Services Business

In 2006 we established our Energy Efficiency Services business through the acquisitions of Parke and Kapadia.  Our acquisition of AEM in June 2008 as well as additional acquisitions and the opening of new offices have significantly added to this segment.  Our Energy Efficiency Services represented 100%

22

Table of Contents

of our consolidated revenue in 2008 and 2009. Certain characteristics of this business, such as seasonality, margins and working capital requirements, are fundamentally different than those of our previous business; therefore, we believe our historical results will not be indicative of our future performance. As an example, in 2007, 2008 and 2009, the Energy Efficiency Services business was somewhat seasonal with a disproportionate amount of revenue recognized in the second half of the year. This seasonality is likely to result in greater fluctuations in our revenue, earnings and working capital requirements throughout the year than we had experienced prior to the establishment of our Energy Efficiency Services business. Because certain of our expenses are relatively fixed, fluctuations in our revenues are also likely to cause fluctuations in our profit.

Sale of Energy Technology Division

In May 2005 we added the eMAC and uMAC line of HVAC and lighting controllers through the acquisition of Maximum Performance Group, Inc. (“MPG”). This product line never reached the level of sales necessary to achieve profitability.   In March 2009 we made the decision to exit the business and retained an investment bank to assist us in locating potential buyers.  On August 10, 2009 we sold certain assets of this business, including the rights to the eMAC and uMAC technology.  The results of operations from the Energy Technology segment have been reported as discontinued operations in the accompanying financial statements.  During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, in anticipation of the sale, we reduced the carrying value of these assets to their expected fair value, incurring an impairment loss of $503,000.

AEM Transaction

On June 11, 2008, we acquired AEM.  AEM provides energy engineering and consulting services and energy efficiency services similar to our existing energy efficiency lighting solutions.  In addition, it provides mechanical and electrical conservation services, water conservation services and renewable energy solutions primarily for government and municipal facilities, all markets that we had not previously participated in.  The majority of AEM’s clients are ESCOs and it operates primarily on the East Coast.

Because of the significance of this acquisition, our historical operating results are not expected to be indicative of our future operating results. In particular, we expect our revenue and expenses to increase substantially as a result of this acquisition. The following table reflects our historical operating results for selected income statement line items for the year ended December 31, 2008, and the same line items on a pro forma basis assuming the AEM acquisition and the related financing transactions occurred effective January 1, 2008:

23

Table of Contents

As a result of our acquisition of AEM, our pro forma revenue and gross profit were higher than our actual revenue and gross profit.  Also as a result of our acquisition of AEM, our pro forma SG&A expense was higher than our actual SG&A expense.  The higher pro forma SG&A expense more than offset the higher gross profit, resulting in a pro forma operating loss that was greater than our actual operating loss.  Due to the interest expense that we incurred in connection with our acquisition of AEM, our pro forma net interest expense was higher than our actual net interest expense.  As a result of our pro forma operating loss being greater than our actual operating loss and our pro forma net interest expense being higher than our actual net interest expense, our pro forma net loss was greater than our actual net loss.

The acquisition of AEM may reduce the seasonality of our consolidated revenue because AEM derives the majority of its revenue from long-term government contracts that are generally not seasonal in nature.   However, because a few large projects are often responsible for a significant portion of AEM’s annual revenue, the level of activity, initial project delays or gaps between projects can have a significant impact on the revenue and earnings of a particular period.

We borrowed $4.5 million on our line of credit to fund the cash portion of the AEM acquisition price and we made a $2.0 million equity infusion into AEM immediately following the acquisition for working capital requirements.  The additional interest expense associated with this use of our line of credit has been included in our pro forma results for 2008.

ADVB Acquisition

On November 18, 2008, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with controlling stockholders of Advanced Biotherapy, Inc. (“ADVB”), pursuant to which we agreed to acquire 90.8% of the outstanding capital stock of ADVB at $0.008625 per share in exchange for their shares of our common stock. Through a short-form merger, we offered the remaining ADVB stockholders the same consideration for their common stock.  On March 3, 2009, we completed the merger and acquired ADVB.  ADVB’s assets included approximately $7.4 million of cash and an $800,000 note receivable.  ADVB’s assets also included a revolving credit note due from us, which had an outstanding balance of approximately $42,000 as of the closing. We have cancelled the revolving credit note.  We did not

24

Table of Contents

continue to operate ADVB’s prior business and consider the transaction to have been in substance an equity offering in which we issued shares of our common stock in return for approximately $8.2 million in cash and notes receivable.

Public Offering

On September 25, 2009, we completed an underwritten follow-on public offering of our common stock, receiving $27,500,000 in gross proceeds less $1,650,000 in underwriters’ discount and offering costs of $382,000.  On October 2, 2009, the Underwriters exercised their overallotment and purchased an additional 750,000 shares at $5.50 per share, less a discount of 6% for total net proceeds to the Company of $3,877,500.  Proceeds from the offering were used to repay a $2 million line of credit and $1.4 million in notes payable.  The balance of the proceeds will be used for other general corporate purposes.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Critical accounting policies are defined as those that involve significant judgments and uncertainties, and potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that our most critical accounting policies are limited to those described below. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 3 in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.

Use of Estimates

Preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related contingent liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenues, bad debts, warranty accrual, income taxes and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Revenue and Profit Recognition

We recognize our revenue when all four of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence has been received that an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery of the products and/or services has occurred; (iii) the selling price is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. In addition, we follow the provisions of the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition, which sets forth guidelines in the timing of revenue recognition based upon factors such as passage of title, installation, payments and client acceptance. Any amounts received prior to satisfying our revenue recognition criteria are recorded as deferred revenue.

Historically, we have recognized revenue primarily on a completed contract basis. Under the completed contract method, revenue is recognized once the project is substantially complete, resulting in some variability in revenue. This method works well with projects that are smaller and shorter in duration. AEM, however, recognizes, and will continue to recognize, all of its revenue on a percentage of completion basis.  AEM’s projects generally are larger in terms of revenue and longer in duration; therefore, AEM recognizes revenue throughout the term of the project on a completion method based on

25

Table of Contents

the percentage of costs incurred.   As a result of the acquisition of AEM, we expect that the majority of our revenue will be recognized on a percentage of completion basis.  Under both methods of revenue recognition, any anticipated losses on contracts are charged to operations as soon as they are determinable.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our clients to make required payments. The allowance is largely based upon specific knowledge of clients from whom collection is determined to be doubtful and our historical collection experience with such clients. If the financial condition of our clients or the economic environment in which they operate were to deteriorate, resulting in an inability to make payments, or if our estimates of certain clients’ ability to pay are incorrect, additional allowances may be required. During 2009 we increased our allowance by $304,000 and wrote off receivables of $145,000. As of December 31, 2009, our allowance for doubtful accounts was approximately $322,000, or 1.7% of our outstanding accounts receivable.

Amortization of Intangibles

We account for acquisitions of companies in accordance with the ASC 805.  We allocate the purchase price to tangible assets and intangible assets based on their fair values, with the excess of purchase price amount being allocated to goodwill.  The determination of the fair values of these intangible assets is based on a number of significant assumptions as determined by us, including evaluations of the future income producing capabilities of these assets and related future expected cash flows or replacement cost of the asset.  We also make estimates about the useful lives of the acquired intangible assets.  Should different conditions result in the determination that the value of the acquired intangible assets has been impaired, we could incur write-downs of intangible assets, or changes in the estimation of useful lives of those intangible assets.  In accordance with ASC 350, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to annual impairment testing which is discussed in greater detail below.

Intangible assets included acquired technology, customer and contractual relationships, client backlog, non-competition agreements and trade names. Acquired technology was initially recorded at fair value based on the estimated after tax cost to replace the asset and is amortized over its estimated useful life on a straight-line basis.  Customer and contractual relationships represent contractual and separable relationships that we have with certain customers and partners.  These contractual relationships were initially recorded at their fair value based on the present value of expected future cash flows and are amortized over their estimated useful life.  Non-competition agreements were initially recorded based on the present value of potential profits that could be lost, should the individual initiate a competing enterprise, and are amortized over the minimum term of the non-competition agreements.  Trade name intangible assets are initially recorded at fair value based on the present value of the royalty payments that would need to be paid for the development and use of a comparable trade name should the name be unavailable to us.  Trade name intangible assets are deemed to have an indeterminate life and are not amortized.

Impairment Loss

We evaluate all of our long-lived assets, including intangible assets other than goodwill and fixed assets, periodically for impairment in accordance with ASC 360-10-35, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. We record impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amount of those items. Our cash flow estimates are based on historical results adjusted to reflect our best estimate of future market and

26

Table of Contents

operating conditions. The net carrying value of assets not recoverable is reduced to fair value. Our estimates of fair value represent our best estimate based on industry trends and reference to market rates and transactions.  During 2009, we determined that the Parke trade name was impaired as a result of our decision to operate the business under the Lime Energy name.  As a result we incurred an impairment loss of $1.6 million, net of the tax benefit, during the fourth quarter of 2009.

Goodwill

We have made acquisitions in the past that included a significant amount of goodwill and other intangible assets. In accordance with ASC 350, goodwill is subject to an annual (or under certain circumstances more frequent) impairment test based on its estimated fair value. Estimated fair value is less than value based on undiscounted operating earnings because fair value estimates include a discount factor in valuing future cash flows.  Many assumptions and estimates underlie the determination of an impairment loss, including economic and competitive conditions, operating costs and efficiencies. Another estimate using different, but still reasonable, assumptions could produce a significantly different result.

During the fourth quarter of 2007 we updated our projections for portions of the Energy Efficiency Services and Energy Technology businesses and estimated the fair value based on the discounted current value of the estimated future cash flows. We then compared the calculated fair values of the reporting units to their carrying values. The analysis did not identify any impairment for the Energy Efficiency Services business, but did indicate that the value of the Energy Technology’s goodwill was impaired. The decline in the fair value of the Energy Technology segment was primarily the result of lower than expected sales of the eMAC line of HVAC controllers, in large part due to delays in a project to replace certain obsolete eMAC components. As a result of the decline in the fair value, we recorded an impairment loss of $4.2 million during the fourth quarter of 2007.

During the fourth quarters of 2008 we updated our analyses for the Energy Efficiency Services business and concluded that the implied fair value of the businesses based on the discounted current value of the estimated future cash flows exceeded the carrying value, indicating that the goodwill was not impaired.

2009 was the first period that we tested the goodwill associated with the AEM purchase for impairment.  For goodwill testing purposes, we analyzed the goodwill associated with the AEM acquisition and our C&I business separately.  The goodwill impairment analysis indicated there was no goodwill impairment as the fair value of the C&I and AEM testing units exceeded their carrying values.  We considered various factors in determining the fair value of the testing units, including discounted cash flows from projected earnings, values for comparable companies and the market price of our common stock. We will continue to monitor for any impairment indicators such as underperformance of projected earnings, net book value compared to market capitalization, declining stock price and significant adverse economic and industry trends.  In the event that either testing unit does not achieve projected results, or, as the result of changes in facts of circumstances, we could incur a goodwill impairment charge in a future period.

Stock-Based Compensation

We have a stock incentive plan that provides for stock-based employee compensation, including the granting of stock options and shares of restricted stock, to certain key employees. The plan is more fully described in Note 25 to our consolidated financial statements. Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted ASC 718, Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)), which requires that we record stock compensation

27

Table of Contents

expense for equity-based awards granted, including stock options and restricted stock unit grants, over the service period of the equity-based award based on the fair value of the award at the date of grant. We recognized $1.7 million, $3.8 million and $3.7 million of stock compensation related to employee options expense during 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Results of Operations

Revenue

We generate the majority of our revenue from the sale of our services as well as the sale of our proprietary products and the products that we purchase and resell to our clients. All of our revenue is earned in the United States.

Our revenue includes charges for our engineering, installation and/or project management services and the materials we purchase and resell to our clients. The substantial majority of our revenue is derived from fixed-price contracts, although we occasionally bill on a time-and-materials basis. Under fixed-price contracts, we bill our clients for each project once the project is completed or throughout the project as specified in the contract. Under time-and-materials arrangements, we bill our clients on an hourly basis with material costs and other reimbursable expenses passed through and recognized as revenue. Historically, our projects have typically been completed within one to three weeks, with the exception of a few multi-month projects. With the addition of AEM in June 2008, the number of multi-month projects have increased significantly as, historically, AEM’s projects have typically taken four to eight months to complete.

Gross Profit

Gross profit equals our revenue less costs of sales. The cost of sales consists primarily of materials, our internal labor, including engineering, and the cost of subcontracted labor.

Gross profit is a key metric that we use to examine our performance. Gross profit depends in part on the volume and mix of products and services that we sell during any given period. A portion of our expenses, such as the cost of certain salaried project management and engineering personnel, are relatively fixed. Accordingly, an increase in the volume of sales will generally result in an increase to our margins since these fixed expenses are not expected to increase proportionately with sales. Our business is also seasonal, as such, our margins will vary with seasonal changes in our revenue due to the fixed nature of some of our costs.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) include the following components:

·                  direct labor and commission costs related to our employee sales force;

·                  costs of our non-production management, supervisory and staff salaries and employee benefits, including the costs of stock-based compensation;

·                  costs related to insurance, travel and entertainment, office supplies and utilities;

·                  costs related to marketing and advertising our products;

·                  legal and accounting expenses; and

·                  costs related to administrative functions that serve to support our existing businesses, as well as to provide the infrastructure for future growth.

28

Table of Contents

Amortization of Intangibles

We incur expenses related to the amortization of identifiable assets that we have capitalized in connection with our acquisitions.

Other Expense

Other expense consists of interest expense, net of interest earned on our investments. Interest expense represents the interest costs and fees associated with our subordinated convertible term notes (including amortization of the related debt discount and issuance costs), our lines of credit, the mortgage on our headquarters building, notes payable and various vehicle loans. Interest income includes earnings on our invested cash balances and amortization of the discount on our long term receivables.  We offer certain customers extended payment terms.  When we record these receivables we are required to discount them using a market rate of interest and amortize the discount over the term of the receivable.  This amortization is recognized as interest income.

Dividend Expense

Dividend expense includes dividends accrued on our preferred stock and charges for non-cash deemed dividends.

29

Table of Contents

Twelve-Month Period Ended December 31, 2009

Compared With the

Twelve-Month Period Ended December 31, 2008

Consolidated Results

(1) Assumes the acquisition of Applied Energy Management had been completed on January 1, 2008.

30

Table of Contents

The following table presents the percentage of certain items to revenue:

(1) Assumes the acquisition of Applied Energy Management had been completed on January 1, 2008.

Revenue

Our consolidated revenue for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2009 increased $15.8 million or 28.8% over the $55.0 million recognized during the twelve-month period ended 2008.  The increase was primarily due to the inclusion of a full twelve months of revenue from AEM and increased revenue derived from our public sector markets.  Revenue derived from our commercial and industrial markets was flat from the prior year.  Our revenue increased $5.7 million or 8.7% when compared to our pro-forma results for 2008.  This increase again was the result of higher sales in our public sector markets.

Uncertainty on the part of our Commercial & Industrial (C&I) customers related to the economy impacted our results in the C&I market during 2009.  We believe that some of this uncertainty has begun to ease and we have seen some projects that were previously on hold begin to move forward.  If things continue to improve as we currently believe they will, we expect that we will see higher revenue from C&I customers during 2010.  Revenue from our public sector customers was negatively impacted late in 2009 by delays in the release of funds under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (commonly referred to as the stimulus).  While the timing of the release of these funds is outside of our control, we anticipate they should begin to be released during the third or fourth quarter of 2010.  To the extent that they are, we expect that our revenue from public sector clients will be flat to up slightly from 2009 levels.  During 2009 we began two new initiatives; utility program management and direct federal work under the FRR contract.  Neither of these new initiatives contributed materially to 2009 revenue, but we believe that they could represent as much as 20% to 30% of our 2010 revenue.  The combination of the ramp up to the new initiatives and improving conditions in our C&I and public sector markets is

31

Table of Contents

expected to result in higher revenue in 2010 that is heavily weighted to the third and fourth quarters of the year.

32

Table of Contents

Gross Profit

Our gross profit increased $1.9 million or 16.4% to $13.6 million during 2009 from $11.7 million during 2008 and $0.2 million or 1.3% from pro-forma 2008 results.    Our gross profit margin was 19.2% during 2009 compared to 21.3% for 2008 on a historical basis and $20.6% on a pro-forma basis.  The decline in our gross margin was due to a change in the mix of our business that included a larger portion of lower margin jobs.  Our public sector projects and large C&I projects typically carry lower margins than small and mid-sized C&I projects, but these public sector and large C&I projects also typically have general higher revenue per associated selling expense.   The gross margins earned from our utility program management initiative are expected to approximate our historical consolidated gross margins, whereas the gross margins from FRR projects will be lower than the gross margins earned from our other businesses.  The lower FRR gross margins are offset by low, largely fixed SG&A for this initiative, thus FRR expected to contribute to overall profitability at relatively low revenue levels.  We believe that our consolidated gross margins will increase slightly during 2010 as we spread our fixed costs over higher revenue.  Our gross margins will vary throughout the year depending on the mix of revenue and overall revenue level, with the highest margins expected in the third and fourth quarters when revenues peak.

Selling General &Administrative Expense

Our selling, general and administrative expenses increased $5.8 million or 32.3% during 2009 to $23.9 million from $18.1 million for 2008.  The majority of the increase in our SG&A was due to the inclusion of twelve months of expense from AEM, which was acquired in June 2008.  Our SG&A expense increased $1.6 million or 7.3% when compared to 2008 pro-forma SG&A.  Our SG&A as a percent of revenue increased slightly during 2009 to 33.8% from 32.9% in 2008 on a historical basis, but declined from 34.3% on a pro-forma basis.  The increase in SG&A expense over pro-forma was primarily the result of the investment in the utility program management and FRR initiatives during 2009.  Neither of these initiatives had material revenue during 2009, but both are expected to be significant contributors to 2010 revenue.  The 2009 SG&A expense also included a one-time reserve of $300,000 for a legal settlement.   Other changes in SG&A included a $1.9 million decline in our share based compensation expense, which was largely offset by increases in wages, outside services, franchise taxes and rent expense.  We do not intend to increase our SG&A headcount significantly, if at all, in 2010, thus expect a much smaller increase in wage expense for the year.  A significant portion of the increase in outside services was related to implementation of a new accounting system at AEM and a new corporate email system, neither of which will require the same level of expenditures in 2010.  In addition, our stockholders authorized a reduction in our authorized shares of common stock at our 2009 annual meeting, which will reduce our franchise tax expense during 2010.  Overall, we expect our SG&A expense will increase moderately during 2010 due primarily to the utility program management and FRR initiatives, but we expect our SG&A as a percent of our revenue to be lower in 2010 than it was in 2009.

Amortization of Intangibles

Amortization expense declined $347,000, or 22.1%, to $1.2 million during 2009 from $1.6 million in 2008.  Amortization expense has declined as certain intangible assets associated with past acquisitions have become fully amortized.  Absent any new acquisitions, we expect our amortization expense will decline to $589,000 in 2010 and $613,000 in 2011.

Impairment Loss

During 2009 we determined that the Parke trade name was impaired due to our decision to operate the business under the Lime Energy name.  As a result, we reduced the carrying value of this intangible asset to $0, incurring a $2.6 million impairment loss during the fourth quarter of 2009.  This loss was partially offset by the reversal of a $1 million deferred tax liability associated with this indefinite-lived asset.

33

Table of Contents

Other Income (Expense)

Other non-operating expense increased $492,000 to $3,073,000 in 2009 from $2,581,000 in 2008.  Interest expense increased $542,000 during 2009 to $3,210,000 from $2,668,000 in 2008.  The components of interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows (in thousands):

Total contractual interest expense (the interest on outstanding loan balances) decreased $1,116,000 or 67.1% from $1,664,000 in 2008 to $548,000 in 2009.  The decline in interest expense was primarily due to reduced use of our line of credit and the conversion of the subordinated notes.  In November 2008, $14.5 million outstanding on the line of credit was converted to common stock and the line of credit was terminated in March 2009 when we acquired Advanced Biotherapy, Inc.  The subordinated notes were converted to common stock during the third quarter of 2009.

Amortization of deferred issuance costs and debt discount increased $720,000 to $1,724,000 in 2009 from $1,004,000 in 2008.  The 2009 expense included $1,411,000 of unamortized debt discount of which $756,000 and $2,000 of deferred issuance costs were expensed when the subordinated notes converted to common stock during the third quarter of 2009.

In August 2009 we issued warrants in connection with the new bridge line of credit.  These warrants were valued at $309,000 using a trinomial tree option pricing model and the value was recorded as a debt discount, which we began to amortize over the schedule term of the facility.  We terminated the bridge line of credit in October 2009 following the completion of a follow-on offering of common stock, at which time we expensed the remaining unamortized debt discount.

We used a portion of the proceeds from the 2009 follow-on offering to repay most of our remaining outstanding debt.  As of December 31, 2009 our outstanding debt totaled $731,000, which was comprised a mortgage and various vehicle loans, and there was no remaining unamortized debt discount or deferred issuance costs.  We expect to incur approximately $26,000 of interest expense during 2010 on the debt that was outstanding as of December 31, 2009.

Our interest income increased $50,000 to $137,000 during 2009 from $87,000 for 2008.  Approximately $113,000 of the 2009 interest income was amortization of the discount on our long-term receivables, compared to $39,000 of amortization recognized on these receivables during 2008.

34

Table of Contents

Discontinued Operations

Our loss from discontinued operations declined $694,000 or 28% to $1,786,000 in 2009 from $2,480,000 in 2008.  Discontinued Operations represents the results from our Energy Technology business, which we sold in August 2009.

Dividend Expense.

Dividend expense increased $1,211,000 during 2009 to $1,499,000 from $288,000 during 2008.  The dividend expense was related to our Series A-1 preferred stock which was created when $14.5 million of our line of credit was converted into shares of the Series A-1 on November 14, 2008.  The Series A-1 was converted into common stock on August 10, 2009, at which time we stopped accruing dividends.  There were no shares of preferred stock outstanding as of December 31, 2009.

Twelve-Month Period Ended December 31, 2008

Compared With the

Twelve-Month Period Ended December 31, 2007

Consolidated Results

35

Table of Contents

The following table presents the percentage of certain items to revenue:

Revenue

Our revenue during the twelve month period ended December 31, 2008 was $55.0 million, a $38.6 million or 235.5% increase over the $16.4 million recorded during the twelve month period ended December 31, 2007.  Revenue generated by AEM, which was acquired in June 2008, was responsible for approximately $31 million of the increase in 2008 revenue. The balance of the increase was the result of higher sales from our existing businesses due largely to increased productivity from our sales force.

If we included AEM’s revenue for the first five months of 2008 and for all of 2007, our total revenue increased $7.8 million, or 13.7%, to $65.1 million in 2008 from $57.3 million in 2007. This increase was the result of higher sales due largely to increased productivity from our sales force.

Gross Profit

Our gross profit increased $8.1 million or 222.3% to $11.7 million during 2008 from $3.6 million earned in 2007, while our gross margin declined to 21.3% during 2008 from 22.1% in 2007.  The increase in our gross profit was directly related to the increase in our sales during the year.  The decline in our gross margin was attributable to a change in the mix of our sales revenue and the acquisition of AEM.

If we included AEM’s gross profit for the first five months of 2008 and for all of 2007, our gross profit increased $1 million, or 7.9%, to $13.4 million in 2008 from $12.4 million in 2007, while our gross profit margin declined from 21.7% in 2007 to 20.6% in 2008. The increase in gross profit was the result of higher revenue. The decline in gross margin was due to a change in the mix of sales.

36

Table of Contents

Selling General &Administrative Expense

Our selling, general and administrative expense was $18.1 million during 2008, an increase of $8.8 million or 95.5% when compared to $9.3 million in 2007.  SG&A as a percentage of revenue declined from 56.5% in 2007 to 32.9% in 2008.  The acquisition of AEM was responsible for approximately $6.2 million of the increase in our SG&A expense, while the balance of the increase was related to an increase in personnel related costs including labor, rent, travel, utilities and outside sales commissions.  The higher personnel costs were the result of inclusion of 2007 acquisitions for a full year and new hires in sales and administration.  These increases were partially offset by the elimination of $268,000 of one-time registration penalties included in the 2007 SG&A.

If we included AEM’s SG&A expense for the first five months of 2008 and for all of 2007, our SG&A expense increased $3.8 million or 20.6%, to $22.3 million in 2008 from $18.5 million in 2007, while SG&A as a percentage of revenue increased from 32.3% in 2007 to 34.3% in 2008. The increase in SG&A expense was the result of an increase in personnel related costs including labor, rent, travel, utilities, outside sales commissions and share based compensation. The higher personnel costs were the result of inclusion of 2007 acquisitions for a full year and new hires in sales and administration. These increases were partially offset by the elimination of $268,000 of one-time registration penalties included in the 2007 SG&A.

Amortization of Intangibles

Expense associated with the amortization of intangible assets increased $81,000, or 5.4% to $1.6 million in 2008, from $1.5 million in 2007.   Amortization expense related to our 2006 and 2007 acquisitions declined approximately $1.1 million as the intangibles associated with these acquisitions have become fully amortized.  This decline was offset by approximately $1.2 million of amortization expense on AEM’s intangibles recognized during 2008.

Other Income (Expense)

Other non-operating expense increased $1.9 million to $2.6 million in 2008 from $668,000 in 2007.  Interest expense increased $1.7 million to $2.7 million in 2008 from $1 million in 2007.    The components of interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows (in thousands):