UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 | ||
| ||
or | ||
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-33783
THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
British Columbia, Canada |
|
98-0583591 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
26 West Dry Creek Circle, Suite 810, Littleton, CO |
|
80120 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(303) 761-8801
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes x No
As of August 8, 2011 there were 167,870,646 shares of our common stock, no par value, outstanding.
|
Page | |
|
| |
Part I. Financial Information |
| |
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
1 | |
|
|
|
|
2 | |
|
|
|
|
3 | |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders Equity and Comprehensive Income (Unaudited) |
4 |
|
|
|
|
5 | |
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
19 |
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
38 |
|
|
|
|
39 | |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
39 | |
|
|
|
|
41 | |
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
44 |
|
|
|
|
44 | |
|
|
|
|
44 | |
|
|
|
|
44 | |
|
|
|
|
45 | |
|
|
|
Exhibit Index |
45 | |
|
|
|
47 |
THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC.
(Unaudited)
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(in millions, except share data) |
| ||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
560.4 |
|
$ |
316.0 |
|
Accounts receivabletrade |
|
93.3 |
|
63.3 |
| ||
Accounts receivablerelated parties |
|
11.6 |
|
10.0 |
| ||
Product inventory |
|
86.7 |
|
75.5 |
| ||
Material and supplies inventory |
|
34.3 |
|
31.5 |
| ||
Prepaid expense and other current assets |
|
4.2 |
|
7.6 |
| ||
Income tax receivable |
|
6.5 |
|
12.9 |
| ||
|
|
797.0 |
|
516.8 |
| ||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
1,990.3 |
|
1,696.1 |
| ||
Restricted cash |
|
27.7 |
|
23.5 |
| ||
Reclamation deposits |
|
24.5 |
|
24.7 |
| ||
Goodwill |
|
47.0 |
|
47.0 |
| ||
Other assets |
|
20.9 |
|
9.6 |
| ||
|
|
$ |
2,907.4 |
|
$ |
2,317.7 |
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
121.3 |
|
$ |
64.8 |
|
Income and mining taxes payable |
|
3.5 |
|
3.7 |
| ||
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
5.5 |
|
5.4 |
| ||
Deferred income tax liabilities |
|
12.2 |
|
7.7 |
| ||
Other current liabilities |
|
2.1 |
|
0.2 |
| ||
|
|
144.6 |
|
81.8 |
| ||
Gold Stream deferred revenue |
|
226.5 |
|
226.5 |
| ||
Long-term debt |
|
363.7 |
|
16.6 |
| ||
Other liabilities |
|
21.7 |
|
22.4 |
| ||
Asset retirement obligations |
|
31.1 |
|
29.2 |
| ||
Common stock warrant derivatives |
|
45.9 |
|
174.7 |
| ||
Deferred income tax liabilities |
|
325.8 |
|
336.6 |
| ||
|
|
1,159.3 |
|
887.8 |
| ||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common stock, no-par, 167,810,072 and 165,189,873 shares issued and outstanding, as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
1,012.6 |
|
980.9 |
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
49.3 |
|
49.2 |
| ||
Retained earnings |
|
592.2 |
|
346.5 |
| ||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
94.0 |
|
53.3 |
| ||
|
|
1,748.1 |
|
1,429.9 |
| ||
|
|
$ |
2,907.4 |
|
$ |
2,317.7 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Molybdenum sales |
|
$ |
186.2 |
|
$ |
145.5 |
|
$ |
388.6 |
|
$ |
269.5 |
|
Tolling, calcining and other |
|
4.7 |
|
2.9 |
|
9.0 |
|
6.7 |
| ||||
Total revenues |
|
190.9 |
|
148.4 |
|
397.6 |
|
276.2 |
| ||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Operating expenses |
|
91.7 |
|
73.8 |
|
189.7 |
|
150.1 |
| ||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
17.6 |
|
11.9 |
|
36.0 |
|
22.9 |
| ||||
Total cost of sales |
|
109.3 |
|
85.7 |
|
225.7 |
|
173.0 |
| ||||
Selling and marketing |
|
2.5 |
|
1.8 |
|
4.9 |
|
3.3 |
| ||||
Accretion expense |
|
0.4 |
|
0.4 |
|
0.9 |
|
0.8 |
| ||||
General and administrative |
|
6.4 |
|
7.3 |
|
14.3 |
|
13.1 |
| ||||
Acquisition costs |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
| ||||
Exploration |
|
3.2 |
|
1.8 |
|
6.8 |
|
3.5 |
| ||||
Total costs and expenses |
|
121.8 |
|
98.1 |
|
252.6 |
|
194.8 |
| ||||
OPERATING INCOME |
|
69.1 |
|
50.3 |
|
145.0 |
|
81.4 |
| ||||
OTHER (INCOME) AND EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in fair value of common stock warrants |
|
(60.4 |
) |
(74.8 |
) |
(126.4 |
) |
(50.3 |
) | ||||
Gain on foreign exchange |
|
(2.4 |
) |
(1.9 |
) |
(2.1 |
) |
(1.3 |
) | ||||
Interest and finance fees, net |
|
0.8 |
|
(0.4 |
) |
1.7 |
|
(0.3 |
) | ||||
Other |
|
(0.3 |
) |
(0.2 |
) |
(0.5 |
) |
(0.3 |
) | ||||
Total other (income) and expense |
|
(62.3 |
) |
(77.3 |
) |
(127.3 |
) |
(52.2 |
) | ||||
Income before income and mining taxes |
|
131.4 |
|
127.6 |
|
272.3 |
|
133.6 |
| ||||
Income and mining tax expense |
|
14.6 |
|
1.1 |
|
26.6 |
|
6.0 |
| ||||
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
116.8 |
|
$ |
126.5 |
|
$ |
245.7 |
|
$ |
127.6 |
|
NET INCOME PER SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic |
|
167.3 |
|
139.8 |
|
166.4 |
|
139.7 |
| ||||
Diluted |
|
172.3 |
|
145.4 |
|
174.7 |
|
147.6 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(in millions) |
| ||||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income |
|
$ |
116.8 |
|
$ |
126.5 |
|
$ |
245.7 |
|
$ |
127.6 |
|
Items not affecting cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in fair value of common stock warrants |
|
(60.4 |
) |
(74.8 |
) |
(126.4 |
) |
(50.3 |
) | ||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
17.6 |
|
11.9 |
|
36.0 |
|
22.9 |
| ||||
Accretion expense |
|
0.4 |
|
0.4 |
|
0.9 |
|
0.8 |
| ||||
Amortization of finance fees |
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
| ||||
Stock-based compensation |
|
2.1 |
|
1.7 |
|
3.9 |
|
4.2 |
| ||||
Product inventory write-down |
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
| ||||
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
(0.8 |
) |
(1.1 |
) |
(6.1 |
) |
(2.9 |
) | ||||
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments |
|
(0.5 |
) |
0.7 |
|
(0.5 |
) |
1.3 |
| ||||
Change in working capital accounts (Note 13) |
|
(27.9 |
) |
(24.1 |
) |
(30.1 |
) |
(36.8 |
) | ||||
Cash generated by operating activities |
|
53.6 |
|
41.2 |
|
130.2 |
|
66.8 |
| ||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
115.7 |
|
|
|
85.6 |
| ||||
Capital expenditures |
|
(155.2 |
) |
(71.1 |
) |
(248.1 |
) |
(90.5 |
) | ||||
Restricted cash |
|
(2.1 |
) |
(1.0 |
) |
(4.0 |
) |
(2.5 |
) | ||||
Reclamation deposit |
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
| ||||
Cash generated (used) by investing activities |
|
(157.0 |
) |
43.6 |
|
(251.8 |
) |
(7.4 |
) | ||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Proceeds from issuance of common shares, net |
|
20.4 |
|
0.1 |
|
25.8 |
|
2.1 |
| ||||
Proceeds from senior unsecured note issuance, net (Note 7) |
|
340.1 |
|
|
|
340.1 |
|
|
| ||||
Debt issuance costs |
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
| ||||
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
(1.3 |
) |
(0.9 |
) |
(2.8 |
) |
(2.4 |
) | ||||
Cash generated (used) by financing activities |
|
358.7 |
|
(0.8 |
) |
361.1 |
|
(0.3 |
) | ||||
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH |
|
2.0 |
|
(4.4 |
) |
4.9 |
|
(2.0 |
) | ||||
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
257.3 |
|
79.6 |
|
244.4 |
|
57.1 |
| ||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
303.1 |
|
136.0 |
|
316.0 |
|
158.5 |
| ||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
560.4 |
|
$ |
215.6 |
|
560.4 |
|
$ |
215.6 |
| |
Supplementary cash flow information (Note 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY and COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Paid-in |
|
Retained |
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Income |
|
Total |
| |||||
|
|
(in millions, except share data in thousands) |
| |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Balances at January 1, 2011 |
|
165,190 |
|
$ |
980.9 |
|
$ |
49.2 |
|
$ |
346.5 |
|
$ |
53.3 |
|
$ |
1,429.9 |
|
Amortization of stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
| |||||
Stock option exercises |
|
940 |
|
11.3 |
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
7.1 |
| |||||
Tax benefit of stock option exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
| |||||
Warrant exercises |
|
1,680 |
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.4 |
| |||||
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245.7 |
|
|
|
245.7 |
| |||||
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.7 |
|
40.7 |
| |||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
286.4 |
| |||||
Balances at June 30, 2011 |
|
167,810 |
|
$ |
1,012.6 |
|
$ |
49.3 |
|
$ |
592.2 |
|
$ |
94.0 |
|
$ |
1,748.1 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
(US dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q. In compliance with those instructions, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (US GAAP) have been condensed or omitted. This report should be read in conjunction with Thompson Creek Metals Company Inc.s (TCM or the Company) consolidated financial statements and notes contained in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the 2010 Form 10-K) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The information furnished herein reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods reported. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. TCM bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Accordingly, actual results may differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Certain comparative information has been reclassified to conform to the current years presentation.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of TCM and its subsidiaries, and intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Financial amounts are presented in United States (US) dollars unless otherwise stated. References to C$ are Canadian dollars.
2. Terrane Acquisition
On October 20, 2010, TCM acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding equity of Terrane Metals Corp. (Terrane). At December 31, 2010, the allocation of the purchase price was recorded using preliminary estimates related to the fair value of the mineral properties acquired. As of June 30, 2011, the allocation of the purchase price of Terrane has been finalized. The following table is a summary of the fair value of assets acquired less liabilities assumed:
US$ in millions |
|
|
| |
Cash and restricted cash |
|
$ |
27.1 |
|
Account receivables |
|
2.4 |
| |
Other current assets |
|
0.7 |
| |
Property, plant and equipment and mineralization |
|
850.1 |
| |
Other assets |
|
0.3 |
| |
Current liabilities |
|
(8.6 |
) | |
Deferred income tax liabilities |
|
(178.6 |
) | |
Net assets |
|
$ |
693.4 |
|
From those amounts recorded using preliminary estimates at December 31, 2010, the finalization of the purchase price allocation of Terrane resulted in a $3.3 million decrease to the fair value of property, plant and equipment and mineralization, and a corresponding decrease to deferred income tax liabilities.
THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
(US dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
3. Inventory
The carrying value of product inventory is as follows:
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Finished product |
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
$ |
54.4 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
52.6 |
|
16.6 |
| ||
Stockpiled ore |
|
1.8 |
|
4.5 |
| ||
|
|
$ |
86.7 |
|
$ |
75.5 |
|
As of June 30, 2011, the carrying value of TCMs 75% share from the Endako Mine inventory exceeded the market value, resulting in an inventory write-down of $5.7 million. The write-down of inventory has been included in operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated income statement.
TCM determines the fair value of its product inventory using a market approach based upon published molybdenum market prices as of period end. The following table provides information related to the non-recurring fair value measurement of TCMs 75% share of the Endako Mine inventory as of June 30, 2011. For further discussion regarding fair value measurements and the fair value hierarchy, see Note 6 to these consolidated financial statements.
|
|
As of |
|
Fair Value Measurement Using |
|
Total |
| |||||||||
Balance sheet classification |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
gain/(loss) |
| |||||
Product Inventory |
|
$ |
11.6 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
11.6 |
|
$ |
(5.7 |
) |
4. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment is comprised of the following:
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Mining properties |
|
$ |
1,250.3 |
|
$ |
1,214.3 |
|
Mine development |
|
169.0 |
|
15.4 |
| ||
Mining equipment |
|
328.7 |
|
310.6 |
| ||
Processing facilities |
|
123.4 |
|
124.7 |
| ||
Construction in progress |
|
345.2 |
|
217.8 |
| ||
Other |
|
5.4 |
|
6.9 |
| ||
|
|
2,222.0 |
|
1,889.7 |
| ||
Less: Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
(231.7 |
) |
(193.6 |
) | ||
|
|
$ |
1,990.3 |
|
$ |
1,696.1 |
|
The construction in progress balance included $332.9 million and $213.8 million related to the mill expansion project at the Endako Mine as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The mine development balance relates to the development of Mt. Milligan as of June 30, 2011and December 31, 2010, respectively. No depreciation is currently being recognized on construction in progress or mine development as neither the new mill nor the Mt. Milligan project have been completed or placed into service.
THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
(US dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
5. Derivative Financial Instruments
TCM enters into various derivative financial instruments in its normal course of operations. None of TCMs derivative instruments are treated as hedges for accounting purposes, and all are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value with changes in fair value recorded to the consolidated statements of income, except those contracts for which TCM has elected to apply the normal purchases and normal sales scope exception. TCM is exposed to credit loss when counterparties with which it has entered into derivative transactions are unable to pay. To reduce counterparty credit exposure, TCM deals only with large credit-worthy financial institutions and companies and limits credit exposure to each. TCM believes the counterparties to the contracts to be credit-worthy entities, and therefore, TCM believes credit risk of counterparty non-performance is relatively low. For information regarding the nature and types of TCMs derivatives, see the references noted in the following tables.
The following table summarizes the location and fair value amounts of all derivative financial instruments in the consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
Derivative Type |
|
Balance Sheet Classification |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Derivative assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Provisionally-priced sales(a) |
|
Accounts receivabletrade |
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
$ |
0.1 |
|
Fixed-priced contractscurrent(b) |
|
Prepaid expense and other current assets |
|
0.9 |
|
1.7 |
| ||
Forward currency contracts(c) |
|
Prepaid expense and other current assets |
|
0.1 |
|
|
| ||
Total derivative assets |
|
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common stock warrant derivatives(d) |
|
Common stock warrant derivatives |
|
45.9 |
|
174.7 |
| ||
Total derivative liabilities |
|
|
|
$ |
45.9 |
|
$ |
174.7 |
|
The following table sets forth the gains (losses) on derivative instruments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
Gain/(loss) |
|
Gain/(loss) |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
Statement of Operations |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||
Derivative Type |
|
Classification |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
Provisionally-priced sales(a) |
|
Molybdenum sales |
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
Provisionally-priced purchases(a) |
|
Operating expenses |
|
1.1 |
|
1.1 |
|
0.8 |
|
(2.4 |
) | ||||
Fixed-priced contracts(b) |
|
Molybdenum sales |
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
(0.2 |
) | ||||
Forward currency contracts(c) |
|
(Loss) gain on foreign exchange |
|
(0.3 |
) |
(0.1 |
) |
0.4 |
|
|
| ||||
Common stock warrant derivatives derivatives(d) |
|
Change in fair value of common stock warrants |
|
60.4 |
|
74.8 |
|
126.4 |
|
50.3 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
$ |
61.3 |
|
$ |
74.8 |
|
$ |
128.0 |
|
$ |
47.4 |
|
(a) Provisionally-Priced Contracts
Certain molybdenum sales contracts provide for provisional pricing as specified in such contracts. These sales contain an embedded derivative related to the provisional pricing mechanism, which is bifurcated and accounted for as a derivative.
TCM also enters into provisionally-priced molybdenum purchase contracts that also contain an embedded derivative, which is bifurcated and accounted for as a derivative. Changes to the fair values of the embedded derivatives related to provisionally-priced molybdenum purchases are included in operating expenses in the consolidated statements of income as the product is sold.
TCM determines the fair value of its provisionally-priced contracts using a market approach based upon observable inputs from published market prices and contract terms.
THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
(US dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
The following table sets forth TCMs outstanding provisionally-priced contracts as of June 30, 2011, which all mature in 2011:
|
|
Pounds to be |
|
|
|
Sold/Purchased |
|
|
|
(000s lb) |
|
Provisionally-priced sales |
|
337 |
|
Provisionally-priced purchases |
|
731 |
|
(b) Fixed-Priced Contracts
TCMs results of operations and operating cash flows are affected by changes in market prices for mineral products. To mitigate a portion of this risk, TCM enters into certain mineral product sales contracts where it sells future production at fixed prices. These fixed prices may be different than the quoted market prices at the date of sale. Substantially all of the fixed-priced forward molybdenum sales contracts in place at June 30, 2011 cover the period through December 31, 2011.
The following table sets forth TCMs outstanding fixed-priced molybdenum sales contracts as of June 30, 2011:
|
|
June 30, |
| |
|
|
2011 |
| |
Molybdenum committed (000s lb) |
|
695 |
| |
Average price ($/lb) |
|
$ |
19.20 |
|
(c) Forward Currency Contracts
TCM transacts business in various currencies in the normal course of its operations and for capital expenditures. In addition, with all of its revenues denominated in U.S. dollars, TCM has an on-going foreign exchange risk with respect to its Canadian operations. To help mitigate this risk, TCM, from time to time, enters into various derivative instruments such as foreign currency forward contracts, options and collars. The terms of these instruments are typically less than one year. As of June 30, 2011, TCM had open foreign currency option contracts for C$60 million at exchange rates ranging from $0.99 to $1.00. At December 31, 2010, TCM had no open forward currency contracts.
(d) Common Stock Warrant Derivatives
TCM accounts for its common stock warrants as derivative liabilities with the changes in fair value recorded to the consolidated statements of income.
The following table summarizes common share warrant transactions during the current period:
|
|
Number of Warrants |
|
|
|
(000s) |
|
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
|
80,384 |
|
Warrants exercised |
|
(32,305 |
) |
Warrants expired |
|
(15,501 |
) |
Balance, June 30, 2011 |
|
32,578 |
|
In April 2011, TCM received approximately $17 million of proceeds from the exercise of approximately 27.8 million Terrane warrants and issued 1.4 million TCM shares as a result of these exercises. A total of 15.5 million unexercised 2011 Terrane warrants assumed in the acquisition of Terrane expired on April 16, 2011. As of June 30, 2011, there were approximately 8.1 million Terrane warrants outstanding that expire in June 2012.
THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
(US dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, TCM recorded a non-cash increase to common stock of $2.3 million representing the fair value of warrants exercised on the date of such exercise.
6. Fair Value Measurement
US GAAP accounting standards define fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The standards establish a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entitys own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level 1 |
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. |
Level 2 |
|
Quoted prices in markets that are not active or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. |
Level 3 |
|
Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity). |
The following table sets forth TCMs financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy. As required, assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
|
|
Fair Value at June 30, 2011 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
| ||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Provisionally-priced sales |
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
$ |
|
|
Fixed-priced contractscurrent |
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
| ||||
Foreign currency contracts |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
$ |
0.9 |
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Common stock warrant derivatives |
|
$ |
45.9 |
|
$ |
45.9 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
45.9 |
|
$ |
45.9 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at December 31, 2010 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
| ||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Provisionally-priced sales |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
|
|
Fixed-priced contractscurrent |
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
| ||||
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Common stock warrant derivatives |
|
$ |
174.7 |
|
$ |
174.7 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
174.7 |
|
$ |
174.7 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
(US dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
The following table sets forth a summary of the fair value of TCMs Level 3 financial assets and liabilities for the
six months ended June 30, 2011:
|
|
Fixed- |
| |
|
|
Priced |
| |
|
|
Contracts |
| |
Balance at January 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
Unrealized and realized (gain) |
|
(0.8 |
) | |
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying values of TCMs financial assets and liabilities are not significantly different from their fair values.
7. Debt
TCMs total debt consists of the following:
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Senior unsecured notes |
|
$ |
350.0 |
|
$ |
|
|
Equipment loans |
|
18.6 |
|
21.2 |
| ||
Other |
|
0.6 |
|
0.8 |
| ||
Total debt |
|
369.2 |
|
22.0 |
| ||
Less: Current portion |
|
(5.5 |
) |
(5.4 |
) | ||
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
363.7 |
|
$ |
16.6 |
|
7.375% Senior Unsecured Notes
On May 20, 2011, TCM issued $350 million 7.375% senior unsecured notes (the Notes). The proceeds received in the offering were $340.1 million, which were net of financing fees of $9.9 million. TCM expects to use the net proceeds from the Notes offering to fund the development of Mt. Milligan and for general working capital purposes. The Notes will be redeemable at TCMs option, in whole or in part, at any time on or after June 1, 2014. The Notes will mature on June 1, 2018 and began accruing interest on May 20, 2011 until maturity at a fixed rate of 7.375% per year. Interest is payable in cash semi-annually in arrears on June 1 and December 1, commencing on December 1, 2011. In accordance with accounting guidance on capitalized interest, the interest incurred and amortization of debt issue costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 of $3.0 million was capitalized to TCMs qualifying capital projects.
The Notes are guaranteed on a senior basis by substantially all of TCMs subsidiaries. The Notes include both standard financial and non-financial covenants, including, among others, limitations on incurring additional indebtedness, making restricted payments and allowing new liens. As of June 30, 2011, TCM was in compliance with these covenants. In connection with the issuance of the Notes, TCM, the guarantors and the initial purchasers entered into an agreement obligating TCM to file a registration statement with the SEC so that the holders of the Notes can exchange the Notes for registered notes and related guarantees evidencing the same indebtedness as the Notes.
Credit facility
As of June 30, 2011, TCM has in place a senior secured revolving credit agreement (the Credit Agreement). On February 24, 2011, TCM entered into the First Amendment to the Credit Agreement, which increased the facility from $290 million to $300 million. Subsequently on May 20, 2011 and concurrent with the offering of the Notes (more fully described above), TCM entered into the Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement to, among other things, allow for the issuance of the Notes. The
THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
(US dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
obligations of TCM under of the Credit Agreement are secured by a senior lien on substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets of TCM. The Credit Agreement includes both standard financial and non-financial covenants, including ratio tests for leverage and interest coverage as well as a liquidity test to be met at the time of any drawdown. As of June 30, 2011, TCM was in compliance with the Credit Agreements covenants.
As of June 30, 2011, TCM had no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement and had issued and outstanding $1.0 million in letters of credit under the Credit Agreement. Commitment fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 related to the Credit Agreement were $0.6 million and $1.1 million, respectively. TCM amortized $0.6 million and $1.1 million of finance fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, related to the Credit Agreement.
Equipment financing facility
On March 30, 2011, TCM entered into an equipment financing facility (Equipment Facility) pursuant to which Caterpillar Financial Services Limited (Caterpillar) agreed to underwrite up to $132 million in mobile fleet equipment financing for the Mt. Milligan project. Each borrowing under the Equipment Facility will be for a term of 60 months. Interest on the amounts borrowed under the Equipment Facility is payable at either floating or fixed rates, at TCMs option. TCMs ability to borrow under the Equipment Facility terminates 33 months following its effective date (or such later date as may be agreed upon by Caterpillar), and any unused commitments under the Equipment Facility will then terminate and no longer be available to TCM. At the end of each 60-month lease period, TCM has the option to purchase the underlying equipment for a nominal sum. The Equipment Facility includes both standard financial and non-financial covenants, including ratio tests for leverage and interest coverage. As of June 30, 2011, TCM had no outstanding borrowings under the Equipment Facility and was in compliance with its covenants.
8. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal matters
Below are descriptions of certain legal actions which involve certain properties of TCM. Although the results of legal actions cannot be predicted with certainty, it is the opinion of management that the resolution of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on TCMs future consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In May 2010, the Stellaten First Nation filed a petition in the Supreme Court of British Columbia against the British Columbia Minister of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources and TCM alleging that the Endako Mine and the mill expansion project at the Endako Mine represent infringements of the aboriginal title of the petitioners and impacts to their aboriginal rights, and that the government breached its duty to consult with the Stellaten First Nation in relation to the impacts of the Endako Mine and the mill expansion. The petitioners sought a declaration that the Provincial Crown has not fulfilled its duty to consult with them in relation to the mill expansion project at the Endako Mine, a declaration that the mining permits and/or tenures held by TCM are invalid, an order quashing or setting aside the decision to issue a permit amendment to TCM, and an injunction prohibiting further construction or alterations to the Endako Mine relating to the mill expansion project at the Endako Mine. The government and TCM filed materials in response to the petition, and the matter was heard by the Supreme Court of British Columbia in a hearing that took place in late February and early March of 2011. On August 5, 2011, the Court dismissed the petitioners claims in full.
In January, August and December of 2010, the Nakazdli First Nation commenced separate legal proceedings against Federal or Provincial governments in Canada asserting that it was not adequately consulted by such governments before Terrane was granted various approvals relating to the Mt. Milligan project. No claim of wrongdoing on the part of TCM or Terrane is alleged, and no claim for damages against TCM or Terrane is sought in any of such proceedings. TCM is not a party in any of the proceedings. Terrane has either been named or has had itself added as a participant in two of these proceedings because the relief that is sought in the proceedings would, if granted, have the potential to affect the work being done on the Mt. Milligan project.
Molybdenum purchases
In the normal course of operations, TCM enters into agreements for the purchase of molybdenum. As of June 30, 2011, TCM had commitments to purchase approximately 5.1 million pounds of molybdenum sulfide concentrate throughout the remainder of 2011, to be priced at a discount to the market price for molybdenum oxide at the time of purchase.
THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
(US dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Capital purchase commitments
As of June 30, 2011, TCM had capital purchase commitments of $466.2 million for engineering and equipment related to the development of Mt. Milligan.
Guarantees
As discussed in the 2010 Form 10-K, on December 9, 2009, TCM entered into a credit support agreement with British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority (BC Hydro) related to the mill expansion project at the Endako Mine. Under this agreement, TCM is required to post financial assurance in an amount equal to BC Hydros estimated out-of-pocket costs for work on the Endako mill expansion project. Subsequent to the commissioning of the new mill and subject to annual measurements of BC Hydros incremental revenues following the mills commissioning, some or all of this financial assurance may, thereafter, be released in amounts equal to the incremental revenues generated until such time as the full amount of financial assurance has been released or until such time as the expiration period has been reached. The amount of the guarantee as of June 30, 2011 was C$16.5 million. As part of the financial guarantee, TCM provided a surety bond for C$11.2 million for additional financial assurance to BC Hydro. The surety bond can be drawn down in the event of a shortfall in incremental revenues after the commissioning of the new mill facility. At this time, TCM does not anticipate having to post any additional financial assurance with respect to the BC Hydro credit support agreement.
As of June 30, 2011, a shortfall in Endakos future electric power usage that would result in incremental payments to BC Hydro cannot be determined and is not deemed to be probable. As such, no accrual has been recorded. An accrual for any expected shortfall will be recorded if and when it is determined that a shortfall is probable and a reasonable estimate can be made.
9. Income and Mining Taxes
Income and mining taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were $14.6 million and $1.1 million, respectively. The effective tax rates of 11.1% and 0.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, differ from the amounts that would result from applying the Canadian federal and provincial income tax rates primarily due to the US percentage depletion benefit and the non-taxable change in the fair value of common stock warrants.
Income and mining taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were $26.6 million and $6.0 million, respectively. The effective tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were an expense of 9.8% and 4.5%, respectively.
The 2011 effective tax rate differs from the 2010 effective tax rate primarily due to the non-taxable change in the fair value of TCMs common stock warrants.
10. Stock-Based Compensation
On May 6, 2010, TCMs shareholders approved the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) and the 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). The LTIP allows TCM to grant stock options, share appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted share units, performance share units, or shares as bonus compensation. As of June 30, 2011, TCM has granted stock options, performance share units (PSUs) and restricted share units (RSUs) under the LTIP, as discussed below.
a) Stock Options
The expiration date and vesting provisions of options granted are established at the time an award is made. Options may be exercised by the holder upon vesting of the option award. When an option is exercised, TCM issues the requisite shares from authorized but unissued common stock. The exercise price of option grants awarded is equal to the weighted-average trading price of the underlying shares over the five consecutive trading days immediately before the award date.
The following table summarizes stock option activity during the six months ended June 30, 2011:
THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
(US dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
| |
|
|
Shares (000s) |
|
Exercise Price (C$) |
| |
Stock options outstanding at January 1, 2011 |
|
5,200 |
|
$ |
10.98 |
|
Granted |
|
181 |
|
11.66 |
| |
Exercised |
|
(851 |
) |
8.13 |
| |
Canceled/expired |
|
(176 |
) |
14.49 |
| |
Stock options outstanding at June 30, 2011 |
|
4,354 |
|
$ |
11.51 |
|
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, TCM recorded compensation expense related to stock options of $1.3 million and $2.6 million, respectively.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, TCM recorded compensation expense related to stock options of $1.4 million and $3.9 million, respectively.
b) Performance Share Units
The following table summarizes the PSU activity during the six months ended June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
| |
|
|
Shares (000s) |
|
Award Price (US$) |
| |
Outstanding at January 1, 2011 |
|
230 |
|
$ |
11.88 |
|
PSUs Granted |
|
310 |
|
$ |
11.94 |
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2011 |
|
540 |
|
$ |
11.91 |
|
The vesting of the PSUs is contingent upon employee service and the performance of TCMs share price relative to the established award price. At each anniversary date during the vesting period, if the per share closing price of TCMs common stock on such date is at or higher than the award price, then the awards will vest one-third, and the requisite shares will be issued. If the closing price is less than the award price, and, therefore, the share price condition is not achieved, then those PSUs do not vest and are carried forward to the following anniversary date. Any PSUs not vested at the end of the three-year vesting period will expire.
PSUs granted are accounted for at fair value using a Monte Carlo simulation valuation model on the date of grant. The Monte Carlo model is based on random projections of stock price paths. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, TCM recorded compensation expense related to the PSUs of $0.4 million and $0.7 million, respectively.
c) Restricted Stock Units
The following table summarizes the RSU activity during the six months ended June 30, 2011 :
|
|
Shares (000s) |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2011 |
|
209 |
|
RSUs granted |
|
200 |
|
RSUs vested and common shares issued |
|
(70 |
) |
Outstanding at June 30,2011 |
|
339 |
|
TCM accounts for RSUs at fair value, which is based on the market value of TCMs common shares on the day of grant and recognized over the vesting period of three years. Upon vesting, TCM will issue the requisite shares. TCM recorded $0.3 million and $0.5 million of compensation expense related to its RSUs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively.
11. Net Income per Share
The following is a reconciliation of net income and weighted-average common shares outstanding for purposes of calculating diluted net income per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
(US dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
Net income |
|
$ |
116.8 |
|
$ |
126.5 |
|
$ |
245.7 |
|
$ |
127.6 |
|
Basic weighted-average number of shares outstanding |
|
167.3 |
|
139.8 |
|
166.4 |
|
139.7 |
| ||||
Effect of dilutive securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Common stock warrants |
|
4.5 |
|
0.5 |
|
7.5 |
|
0.9 |
| ||||
Share based awards |
|
0.5 |
|
5.1 |
|
0.8 |
|
7.0 |
| ||||
Diluted weighted-average number of shares outstanding |
|
172.3 |
|
145.4 |
|
174.7 |
|
147.6 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, approximately 2.6 million and 1.2 million of stock options, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted weighted-average shares as the exercise prices exceeded the average price of TCMs common stock for the period. In addition, 0.5 million of PSUs were excluded from the computation of diluted weighted-average shares as the award price exceeded the closing price of TCMs common stock as of June 30, 2011.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, approximately 2.8 million and 1.2 million stock options, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted weighted-average shares as the exercise prices exceeded the average price of TCMs common stock for the period.
12. Related Party Transactions
Total sales by TCM to its Endako Mine joint venture partner were $50.6 million and $103.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. This represented 26.5% and 25.9% of TCMs total revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively.
Total sales to TCMs Endako Mine joint venture partner were $48.1 million and $81.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. This represented 32.4% and 29.6% of TCMs total revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, TCM recorded management fee income of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, and selling and marketing expenses of $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, from this joint venture partner.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, TCM recorded management fee income of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, and selling and marketing expenses of $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively, from this joint venture partner.
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, TCMs related accounts receivable owing from this joint venture partner were $11.6 million and $10.0 million, respectively.
THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
(US dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
13. Supplementary Cash Flow Information
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
Change in working capital accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
$ |
(6.1 |
) |
$ |
(31.2 |
) |
$ |
(17.3 |
) |
Product inventory |
|
(22.8 |
) |
(18.5 |
) |
(15.2 |
) |
(29.7 |
) | ||||
Material and supplies inventory |
|
(1.9 |
) |
(0.3 |
) |
(2.5 |
) |
1.0 |
| ||||
Prepaid expense and other current assets |
|
1.1 |
|
2.7 |
|
3.5 |
|
3.1 |
| ||||
Income tax receivable |
|
0.9 |
|
0.8 |
|
6.7 |
|
(1.2 |
) | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
4.3 |
|
0.5 |
|
8.7 |
|
7.1 |
| ||||
Income and mining taxes payable |
|
(11.5 |
) |
(3.2 |
) |
(0.1 |
) |
0.2 |
| ||||
|
|
$ |
(27.9 |
) |
$ |
(24.1 |
) |
$ |
(30.1 |
) |
$ |
(36.8 |
) |
Cash interest paid |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
Cash income taxes paid |
|
$ |
25.5 |
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
$ |
25.5 |
|
$ |
10.1 |
|
Change in capital expenditure accrual |
|
$ |
(14.9 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
(43.4 |
) |
$ |
|
|
14. Concentration of Credit Risk
TCM is exposed to counterparty risk from its cash and cash equivalent balances, its short-term cash investments, and its reclamation deposits held by financial institutions and governmental entities. TCM monitors its positions with, and the credit quality of, the financial institutions and companies in which it invests its cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, and that hold its reclamation deposits. Counterparties to cash balances, investments and its reclamation deposits are US and Canadian institutions and the US and Canadian governments other than balances maintained in various bank operating accounts. TCMs investment policy limits investments to government-backed financial instruments, commercial paper and other investments meeting the guidelines of its investment policy.
TCM manages its credit risk from its accounts receivable through its collection activities. As of June 30, 2011, TCM had 7 customers which owed TCM more than $3.0 million and accounted for approximately 40% of all receivables outstanding. Another 14 customers had balances greater than $1.0 million but less than $3.0 million that accounted for approximately 24% of total receivables. All of these balances were compliant with credit terms and scheduled payment dates.
TCMs maximum counterparty and credit risk exposure is the carrying value of its cash and accounts receivable. The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and fixed rate debt approximate fair value as of June 30, 2011.
15. Segment Information
TCM has three reportable segments: US Operations Molybdenum, Canadian Operations Molybdenum, and Copper-Gold (Development). The US Operations Molybdenum segment includes all mining, milling, mine site administration, roasting and sale of molybdenum products from the Thompson Creek Mine and the Langeloth Facility, as well as all roasting and sales of third-party purchased material. The Canadian Operations Molybdenum segment includes all mining, milling, mine site administration, roasting and sale of molybdenum products from the 75% owned Endako Mine. The Copper-Gold (Development) segment includes all development expenditures and development site administration from Mt. Milligan. The Inter-segment represents the elimination of management fee income, revenue and cost of sales of product transported from the Canadian Operations to the US Operations for processing. TCMs chief operating decision makers (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer) evaluate segment performance based on segment revenue less costs and expenses. TCM attributes other income and expenses to the reporting segments if the income or expense is directly related to segment operations, as described above. TCM does not allocate corporate expenditures such as general and administrative, exploration, and interest income and expense items to its reporting segments, unless such expenditures are directly related to segment operations. Segment information for the three and six months ended as of June 30, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:
THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
(US dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
For the three months ended June 30, 2011:
|
|
US |
|
Canadian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Operations |
|
Operations |
|
Copper-Gold |
|
Inter- |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Molybdenum |
|
Molybdenum |
|
(Development) |
|
segment |
|
Total |
| |||||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Molybdenum sales |
|
$ |
163.0 |
|
$ |
23.2 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
186.2 |
|
Tolling, calcining and other |
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
| |||||
|
|
167.7 |
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
190.9 |
| |||||
Cost and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Operating expenses |
|
71.2 |
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
91.7 |
| |||||
Selling and marketing |
|
2.1 |
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
2.5 |
| |||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
9.9 |
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
17.2 |
| |||||
Accretion expense |
|
0.3 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
| |||||
|
|
83.5 |
|
28.6 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
111.8 |
| |||||
Segment revenue less costs and expenses |
|
84.2 |
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
79.1 |
| |||||
Other segment expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Loss (gain) on foreign exchange |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) | |||||
Segment income (loss) before income and mining taxes |
|
$ |
84.2 |
|
$ |
(5.8 |
) |
$ |
3.3 |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
$ |
82.0 |
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2010:
|
|
US |
|
Canadian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Operations |
|
Operations |
|
Copper-Gold |
|
Inter- |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Molybdenum |
|
Molybdenum |
|
(Development) |
|
segment |
|
Total |
| |||||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Molybdenum sales |
|
$ |
114.2 |
|
$ |
34.8 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(3.5 |
) |
$ |
145.5 |
|
Tolling, calcining and other |
|
2.9 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
2.9 |
| |||||
|
|
117.1 |
|
34.9 |
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
148.4 |
| |||||
Cost and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Operating expenses |
|
61.4 |
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
73.8 |
| |||||
Selling and marketing |
|
1.2 |
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
1.8 |
| |||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
6.3 |
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.9 |
| |||||
Accretion expense |
|
0.3 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
| |||||
|
|
69.2 |
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
87.9 |
| |||||
Segment revenue less costs and expenses |
|
47.9 |
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
60.5 |
| |||||
Other segment expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Loss (gain) on foreign exchange |
|
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(3.8 |
) | |||||
Segment income (loss) before income and mining taxes |
|
$ |
47.9 |
|
$ |
14.8 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
$ |
64.3 |
|
THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
(US dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
For the six months ended June 30, 2011:
|
|
US |
|
Canadian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Operations |
|
Operations |
|
Copper-Gold |
|
Inter- |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Molybdenum |
|
Molybdenum |
|
(Development) |
|
segment |
|
Total |
| |||||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Molybdenum sales |
|
$ |
330.4 |
|
$ |
58.2 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
388.6 |
|
Tolling, calcining and other |
|
9.0 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
9.0 |
| |||||
|
|
339.4 |
|
58.3 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
397.6 |
| |||||
Cost and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Operating expenses |
|
143.4 |
|
46.4 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
189.7 |
| |||||
Selling and marketing |
|
4.0 |
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
4.9 |
| |||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
19.8 |
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
35.2 |
| |||||
Accretion expense |
|
0.7 |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
| |||||
|
|
167.9 |
|
63.7 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
230.7 |
| |||||
Segment revenue less costs and expenses |
|
171.5 |
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
166.9 |
| |||||
Other segment expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Loss (gain) on foreign exchange |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) | |||||
Segment income (loss) before income and mining taxes |
|
$ |
171.5 |
|
$ |
(6.7 |
) |
$ |
3.3 |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
$ |
168.9 |
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2010:
|
|
US |
|
Canadian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Operations |
|
Operations |
|
Copper-Gold |
|
Inter- |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Molybdenum |
|
Molybdenum |
|
(Development) |
|
segment |
|
Total |
| |||||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Molybdenum sales |
|
$ |
214.5 |
|
$ |
61.8 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(6.8 |
) |
$ |
269.5 |
|
Tolling, calcining and other |
|
6.7 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
6.7 |
| |||||
|
|
221.2 |
|
61.9 |
|
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
276.2 |
| |||||
Cost and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Operating expenses |
|
123.8 |
|
32.8 |
|
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
150.1 |
| |||||
Selling and marketing |
|
2.3 |
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
3.3 |
| |||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
12.8 |
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
22.9 |
| |||||
Accretion expense |
|
0.6 |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
| |||||
|
|
139.5 |
|
44.9 |
|
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
177.1 |
| |||||
Segment revenue less costs and expenses |
|
81.7 |
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
99.1 |
| |||||
Other segment expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Loss (gain) on foreign exchange |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) | |||||
Segment income before income and mining taxes |
|
$ |
81.7 |
|
$ |
18.7 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
$ |
100.8 |
|
THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
(US dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Reconciliation of segment income to net income
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
Segment income |
|
$ |
82.0 |
|
$ |
64.3 |
|
$ |
168.9 |
|
$ |
100.8 |
|
Other (income) expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in fair value of common stock warrants |
|
(60.4 |
) |
(74.8 |
) |
(126.4 |
) |
(50.3 |
) | ||||
General and administrative |
|
6.4 |
|
7.3 |
|
14.3 |
|
13.1 |
| ||||
Acquisition costs |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
| ||||
Exploration |
|
3.2 |
|
1.8 |
|
6.8 |
|
3.5 |
| ||||
Interest (income) expense, net |
|
0.8 |
|
(0.4 |
) |
1.7 |
|
(0.3 |
) | ||||
Loss (gain) on foreign exchange |
|
0.5 |
|
1.9 |
|
(0.1 |
) |
0.4 |
| ||||
Corporate depreciation |
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
| ||||
Other |
|
(0.3 |
) |
(0.2 |
) |
(0.5 |
) |
(0.3 |
) | ||||
Income before income and mining taxes |
|
131.4 |
|
127.6 |
|
272.3 |
|
133.6 |
| ||||
Income and mining taxes |
|
14.6 |
|
1.1 |
|
26.6 |
|
6.0 |
| ||||
Net income |
|
$ |
116.8 |
|
$ |
126.5 |
|
$ |
245.7 |
|
$ |
127.6 |
|
Other segment information regarding capital expenditures, assets and liabilities, including the assets and liabilities attributed to corporate operations, is as follows:
|
|
US |
|
Canadian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Operations |
|
Operations |
|
Copper-Gold |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
As of June 30, 2011 |
|
Molybdenum |
|
Molybdenum |
|
(Development) |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
| |||||
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
13.9 |
|
$ |
112.0 |
|
$ |
120.2 |
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
$ |
248.1 |
|
Capital assets |
|
$ |
281.9 |
|
$ |
625.2 |
|
$ |
1,076.5 |
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
$ |
1,990.3 |
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
47.0 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
47.0 |
|
Assets |
|
$ |
736.0 |
|
$ |
719.8 |
|
$ |
1,247.5 |
|
$ |
204.1 |
|
$ |
2,907.4 |
|
Liabilities |
|
$ |
116.4 |
|
$ |
156.1 |
|
$ |
458.5 |
|
$ |
428.3 |
|
$ |
1,159.3 |
|
|
|
US |
|
Canadian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Operations |
|
Operations |
|
Copper-Gold |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
As of June 30, 2010 |
|
Molybdenum |
|
Molybdenum |
|
(Development) |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
| |||||
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
32.4 |
|
$ |
55.8 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
$ |
90.5 |
|
Capital assets |
|
$ |
277.2 |
|
$ |
393.3 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |