SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
8-K
CURRENT
REPORT
PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date
of report (Date of earliest event reported)
|
February
12, 2009
|
VARIAN
MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Delaware
|
|
1-7598
|
|
94-2359345
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction
of
Incorporation)
|
|
(Commission
File
Number)
|
|
(IRS
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
3100
Hansen Way, Palo Alto, CA
|
|
94304-1030
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code
|
(650)
493-4000
|
Not
Applicable
(Former
Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)
Check the
appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):
¨ Written communications
pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
¨ Soliciting material
pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
¨ Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
¨ Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))
Item
5.02.
|
Departure of Directors
or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain
Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain
Officers.
|
At the
February 12, 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the stockholders of Varian
Medical Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) approved an amendment to the Company’s
Second Amended and Restated 2005 Omnibus Stock Plan to increase the number of
shares available for grant by 4,200,000. The remaining terms of the
plan are as previously reported under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
At the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the stockholders also approved the Management
Incentive Plan (“MIP”) for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue
Code, which included certain amendments to the prior MIP. The
following paragraphs provide a summary of the principal features of the MIP and
its operation.
The MIP
is intended to motivate the Company’s key employees to increase stockholder
value by (1) linking a portion of employees’ cash compensation to the
Company’s financial and operational performance, (2) providing rewards for
improving financial and operational performance and (3) helping to attract
and retain key employees.
The
Compensation and Management Development Committee (the “Compensation Committee”)
administers the MIP. The Compensation Committee in its discretion
determines eligibility for the MIP. In selecting participants for the
MIP, the Compensation Committee chooses key employees of the Company and its
affiliates who are likely to have a significant impact on our
performance.
Under the
MIP, the Compensation Committee establishes (1) the performance goals that
must be achieved in order for the participant to actually be paid an award and
(2) a formula or table for calculating a participant’s award, depending
upon how actual performance compares to the pre-established performance goals. A
participant’s award will increase or decrease as actual performance increases or
decreases.
The
Compensation Committee also determines the periods for measuring actual
performance—the performance period—which may last as long as three fiscal
years.
The
Compensation Committee may set performance periods and performance goals that
differ from participant to participant. For example, the Compensation
Committee may choose performance goals based on either Company-wide or business
unit results, as deemed appropriate in light of the participant’s specific
responsibilities. For purposes of qualifying awards as
performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), the Compensation
Committee will specify performance goals from the following list: EBIT, EBITDA,
earnings per share, net income, operating cash flow, return on assets, return on
equity, return on sales, revenue, stockholder return, orders or net orders,
expenses, cost of goods sold, profit/loss or profit margin, working capital,
operating income, cash flow, market share, return on equity, economic value add,
stock price of our stock, price/earning ratio, debt or debt-to-equity ratio,
accounts receivable, cash, write-off, assets, liquidity, operations,
intellectual property (e.g., patents), product
development, regulatory activities, manufacturing, production or inventory,
mergers, acquisitions or divestitures, financings, days sales outstanding,
backlog, deferred revenue, and employee headcount. Under the MIP,
certain performance goals are specifically defined, and the definitions
generally conform to those set forth in the Second Amended and Restated 2005
Omnibus Stock Plan.
For any
performance period, no participant may receive an award of more than
$3,000,000. Also, the total of all awards for any performance period
cannot exceed 8% of the Company’s EBIT before incentive compensation for the
Company’s most recent completed fiscal year. Awards that exceed this
overall limit will be pro-rated so that the total does not exceed the
limit.
After the
end of each performance period, a determination is made as to the extent to
which the performance goals applicable to each participant were achieved or
exceeded. The actual award (if any) for each participant is
determined by applying the formula to the level of actual performance that was
achieved. However, the Compensation Committee retains discretion to
eliminate or reduce the actual award payable to any participant below that which
otherwise would be payable under the applicable formula. Awards under
the MIP generally are payable in cash or shares of our common stock no later
than the 15th day of the third month following the end of the performance period
during which the award was earned.
The MIP
provides that, in the event of a restatement of incorrect financial results, the
Board of Directors (the “Board”) will review the conduct of executive officers
in relation to the restatement. If the Board determines that an
executive officer has engaged in misconduct or other violations of the Company’s
code of ethics in connection with the restatement, the Board would, in its
discretion, take appropriate action to remedy the misconduct, including, without
limitation, seeking reimbursement of any portion of performance-based or
incentive compensation paid or awarded to the executive under the MIP that is
greater than would have been paid or awarded if calculated based on the restated
financial results, to the extent not prohibited by governing
law. Such action by the Board would be in addition to any other
actions the Board or the Company may take under the Company’s policies, as
modified from time to time, or any actions imposed by law enforcement,
regulators or other authorities.
Item 9.01.
|
Financial Statements
and Exhibits.
|
(c) Exhibits.
99.1
|
|
Form
of Registrant’s Non-Employee Director NonQualified Stock Option
Agreement (for use outside U.S.) Under the Registrant’s Second Amended and
Restated 2005 Omnibus Stock Plan.
|
|
|
|
99.2
|
|
Form
of Registrant’s Non-Employee Director Deferred Stock Unit Agreement (for
use outside U.S.) Under the Registrant’s Second Amended and Restated 2005
Omnibus Stock Plan.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/
JOHN W. KUO
|
|
John
W. Kuo
|
Title:
|
Corporate
Vice President, General Counsel
and
Secretary
|
Dated: February 18,
2009
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Number
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
Form
of Registrant’s Non-Employee Director NonQualified Stock Option
Agreement (for use outside U.S.) Under the Registrant’s Second Amended and
Restated 2005 Omnibus Stock Plan.
|
|
|
|
99.2
|
|
Form
of Registrant’s Non-Employee Director Deferred Stock Unit Agreement (for
use outside U.S.) Under the Registrant’s Second Amended and Restated 2005
Omnibus Stock Plan.
|