Unassociated Document
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2009
OR
¨
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the Transition Period From _________
to_________
Commission
File Number: 001-32623
CONVERSION
SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
20-0101495
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
100
Eagle Rock Avenue, East Hanover, New Jersey
|
|
07936
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(973)
560-9400
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past
90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated filer ¨
|
Non-accelerated filer ¨
|
Smaller Reporting Company x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
o No x
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
|
|
Outstanding
at
November
10, 2009
|
Common
Stock, $0.001 par value per share
|
|
121,136,289
shares
|
CONVERSION
SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
FORM
10-Q
For
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
Part I.
|
|
Financial
Information
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
|
Financial
Statements
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a)
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 (unaudited) and
December 31, 2008 (unaudited)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b)
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 (unaudited) and 2008 (unaudited)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c)
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 (unaudited) and 2008 (unaudited)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d)
|
|
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
4T.
|
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
22
|
|
|
|
Part II.
|
|
Other
Information
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
22
|
|
|
Item
6.
|
|
Exhibits
|
22
|
|
|
Signature
|
22
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements
CONVERSION
SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
31,473 |
|
|
$ |
338,240 |
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
|
|
4,661,597 |
|
|
|
3,440,810 |
|
Accounts
receivable from related parties, net
|
|
|
398,542 |
|
|
|
284,028 |
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
87,042 |
|
|
|
140,493 |
|
TOTAL
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
5,178,654 |
|
|
|
4,203,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT, at cost, net
|
|
|
41,880 |
|
|
|
68,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER
ASSETS
|
|
|
116,473 |
|
|
|
306,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$ |
5,337,007 |
|
|
$ |
4,578,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line
of credit
|
|
$ |
3,075,964 |
|
|
$ |
2,349,920 |
|
Short
term notes payable
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
1,384,811 |
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
2,049,946 |
|
|
|
1,503,145 |
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
272,236 |
|
|
|
159,177 |
|
Related
party note payable
|
|
|
109,113 |
|
|
|
102,796 |
|
TOTAL
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
6,107,259 |
|
|
|
5,499,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
6,607,259 |
|
|
|
5,499,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
preferred stock, $0.001 par value, $100 stated value, 20,000,000 shares
authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series
A convertible preferred stock, 19,000 shares issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively
|
|
|
1,393,332 |
|
|
|
1,108,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS'
DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, $0.001 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized; 121,072,124 and
119,594,463 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively
|
|
|
121,072 |
|
|
|
119,594 |
|
Series
B convertible preferred stock, 20,000 shares issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively
|
|
|
1,352,883 |
|
|
|
1,352,883 |
|
Additional
paid in capital
|
|
|
68,381,656 |
|
|
|
68,575,918 |
|
Treasury
stock, at cost, 1,145,382 shares in treasury as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively
|
|
|
(423,869 |
) |
|
|
(423,869 |
) |
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(72,095,326 |
) |
|
|
(71,653,822 |
) |
Total
Stockholders' Deficit
|
|
|
(2,663,584 |
) |
|
|
(2,029,296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit
|
|
$ |
5,337,007 |
|
|
$ |
4,578,885 |
|
See Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
CONVERSION
SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR
THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
(Unaudited)
|
|
For the three months ended September 30,
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$ |
7,011,285 |
|
|
$ |
4,235,803 |
|
|
$ |
15,184,707 |
|
|
$ |
11,935,127 |
|
Related
party services
|
|
|
531,142 |
|
|
|
527,272 |
|
|
|
1,567,211 |
|
|
|
1,741,596 |
|
Reimbursable
expenses
|
|
|
410,470 |
|
|
|
186,158 |
|
|
|
855,427 |
|
|
|
498,407 |
|
Other
|
|
|
108,345 |
|
|
|
37,540 |
|
|
|
126,905 |
|
|
|
152,238 |
|
|
|
|
8,061,242 |
|
|
|
4,986,773 |
|
|
|
17,734,250 |
|
|
|
14,327,368 |
|
COST
OF REVENUE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
4,214,161 |
|
|
|
2,980,122 |
|
|
|
10,692,230 |
|
|
|
8,758,582 |
|
Related
party services
|
|
|
465,555 |
|
|
|
505,805 |
|
|
|
1,408,607 |
|
|
|
1,631,099 |
|
Consultant
expenses
|
|
|
434,546 |
|
|
|
219,158 |
|
|
|
961,518 |
|
|
|
618,985 |
|
|
|
|
5,114,262 |
|
|
|
3,705,085 |
|
|
|
13,062,355 |
|
|
|
11,008,666 |
|
GROSS
PROFIT
|
|
|
2,946,980 |
|
|
|
1,281,688 |
|
|
|
4,671,895 |
|
|
|
3,318,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling
and marketing
|
|
|
728,847 |
|
|
|
898,149 |
|
|
|
2,287,269 |
|
|
|
2,587,481 |
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
724,337 |
|
|
|
936,650 |
|
|
|
1,977,774 |
|
|
|
3,045,078 |
|
Goodwill
impairment
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,255,879 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,636,266 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
25,108 |
|
|
|
62,405 |
|
|
|
81,512 |
|
|
|
224,074 |
|
|
|
|
1,478,292 |
|
|
|
5,153,083 |
|
|
|
4,346,555 |
|
|
|
10,492,899 |
|
INCOME
(LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS
|
|
|
1,468,688 |
|
|
|
(3,871,395 |
) |
|
|
325,340 |
|
|
|
(7,174,197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
in (losses) earnings from investments
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
(103,298 |
) |
|
|
12,876 |
|
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(553,846 |
) |
Interest
income (expense), net
|
|
|
(176,070 |
) |
|
|
(340,267 |
) |
|
|
(663,546 |
) |
|
|
(682,447 |
) |
|
|
|
(176,070 |
) |
|
|
(340,377 |
) |
|
|
(766,844 |
) |
|
|
(1,223,417 |
) |
INCOME
(LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
1,292,618 |
|
|
|
(4,211,772 |
) |
|
|
(441,504 |
) |
|
|
(8,397,614 |
) |
INCOME
TAXES
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET
INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
1,292,618 |
|
|
|
(4,211,772 |
) |
|
|
(441,504 |
) |
|
|
(8,397,614 |
) |
Accretion
of issuance costs associated with convertible preferred
stock
|
|
|
(95,000 |
) |
|
|
(95,000 |
) |
|
|
(285,000 |
) |
|
|
(285,000 |
) |
Dividends
on convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
(45,000 |
) |
|
|
(54,078 |
) |
|
|
(135,000 |
) |
|
|
(167,779 |
) |
NET
INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
|
|
$ |
1,152,618 |
|
|
$ |
(4,360,850 |
) |
|
$ |
(861,504 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,850,393 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
used in calculation of earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
119,895,174 |
|
|
|
117,909,029 |
|
|
|
119,813,903 |
|
|
|
114,348,981 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
133,651,512 |
|
|
|
117,909,029 |
|
|
|
119,813,903 |
|
|
|
114,348,981 |
|
See Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
CONVERSION
SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
(Unaudited)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$ |
(441,504 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,397,614 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
of property and equipment and amortization of leasehold
improvements
|
|
|
37,325 |
|
|
|
120,333 |
|
Amortizaton
of intangible assets
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
56,470 |
|
Amortization
of debt discounts
|
|
|
69,070 |
|
|
|
236,844 |
|
Amortization
of relative fair value of warrants issued
|
|
|
115,189 |
|
|
|
164,259 |
|
Amortization
of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
44,188 |
|
|
|
47,271 |
|
Stock
based compensation
|
|
|
115,965 |
|
|
|
449,179 |
|
Goodwill
impairment
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,636,266 |
|
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
553,846 |
|
(Decrease)
increase in allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(97,909 |
) |
|
|
166,789 |
|
Losses
(income) from equity investments
|
|
|
103,298 |
|
|
|
(12,876 |
) |
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
in accounts receivable
|
|
|
(1,118,865 |
) |
|
|
(127,422 |
) |
(Increase)
decrease in accounts receivable from related parties
|
|
|
(118,527 |
) |
|
|
5,921 |
|
Decrease
in prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
27,202 |
|
|
|
17,109 |
|
Increase
in accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
529,369 |
|
|
|
163,491 |
|
Increase
in deferred revenue
|
|
|
113,058 |
|
|
|
28,167 |
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(622,141 |
) |
|
|
(1,891,967 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
|
|
(10,670 |
) |
|
|
(24,016 |
) |
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(10,670 |
) |
|
|
(24,016 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
borrowings (repayments) under line of credit
|
|
|
726,044 |
|
|
|
(1,021 |
) |
Proceeds
from issuance of short-term note payable
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
Principal
payments on short-term notes payable
|
|
|
(400,000 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Deferred
financing costs
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(61,786 |
) |
Issuance
of Company common stock
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Principal
payments on capital lease obligations
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(10,164 |
) |
Principal
payments on related party notes
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(13,230 |
) |
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
326,044 |
|
|
|
513,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET
DECREASE IN CASH
|
|
|
(306,767 |
) |
|
|
(1,402,184 |
) |
CASH,
beginning of period
|
|
|
338,240 |
|
|
|
1,506,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH,
end of period
|
|
$ |
31,473 |
|
|
$ |
104,682 |
|
See Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
CONVERSION
SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
(Unaudited)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for interest
|
|
$ |
469,362 |
|
|
$ |
223,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock issued in conversion of long-term debt to equity
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
Common
stock issued in payment of dividends on preferred stock
|
|
|
111,250 |
|
|
|
144,029 |
|
See Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
CONVERSION
SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note
1 - Accounting Policies
Organization
and Business
Conversion
Services International, Inc. (“CSI” or the “Company”) was incorporated in the
State of Delaware and has been conducting business since 1990. CSI and its
wholly owned subsidiaries (together the “Company”) are principally engaged in
the information technology services industry in the following areas: strategic
consulting, business intelligence/data warehousing and data management to its
customers principally located in the northeastern United States.
CSI was
formerly known as LCS Group, Inc. (“LCS”). In January 2004, CSI merged with and
into a wholly owned subsidiary of LCS. In connection with this transaction,
among other things, LCS changed its name to “Conversion Services International,
Inc.”
Basis
of Presentation
The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by
the Company and are unaudited. The results of operations for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results to
be expected for any future period or for the full fiscal year. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments unless
otherwise indicated) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results
of operations and cash flows at September 30, 2009, and for all periods
presented, have been made. Footnote disclosure has been condensed or omitted as
permitted by Securities and Exchange Commission rules over interim financial
statements.
These
condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the annual audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto
included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008 and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Principles
of Consolidation
The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and
balances have been eliminated in the consolidation. Investments in business
entities in which the Company does not have control, but has the ability to
exercise significant influence (generally 20-50% ownership), are accounted for
by the equity method.
Revenue
recognition
Revenue
from consulting and professional services is recognized at the time the services
are performed on a project by project basis. For projects charged on a time and
materials basis, revenue is recognized based on the number of hours worked by
consultants at an agreed-upon rate per hour. For large services projects where
costs to complete the contract could reasonably be estimated, the Company
undertakes projects on a fixed-fee basis and recognizes revenue as activities
are performed by the Company over the estimated performance period. Revenue
recognized in excess of billings is recorded as cost in excess of billings.
Billings in excess of revenue recognized are recorded as deferred revenue until
revenue recognition criteria are met. Reimbursements, including those relating
to travel and other out-of-pocket expenses, are included in revenue, and an
equivalent amount of reimbursable expenses are included in cost of
services.
The
Company recognizes revenue in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. As a result, in the event that collectability from a client is not
reasonably assured, revenue is recognized on the cash basis. During the nine
month period ended September 30, 2009, approximately $180,769 of billings to
National Digital Medical Archives (“NDMA”) has been deferred and will be
recognized as revenue upon collection of the receivable.
Extinguishment
of debt
In March
2008, the Company and TAG Virgin Islands, Inc. executed a Note Conversion
Agreement whereby certain investors represented by TAG Virgin Islands, Inc.
converted debt due to them under an Unsecured Convertible Line of Credit Note
dated June 7, 2004 into Company Common Stock. A loss of $553,846 on this
transaction was recorded as an early extinguishment of debt.
In July
2008, the Company and TAG Virgin Islands, Inc. executed six promissory notes
whereby certain investors represented by TAG Virgin Islands, Inc. provided
$200,000 to the Company under short-term promissory notes. The Company repaid
these notes in September 2009.
In
September 2008, the Company and TAG Virgin Islands, Inc. executed a promissory
note whereby certain investors represented by TAG Virgin Islands, Inc. provided
$200,000 to the Company under a short-term promissory note. The Company repaid
this note in September 2009.
Fair
value of financial instruments
The
Company utilizes the fair value standards defined by generally accepted
accounting principles which provide guidance for measuring fair value and
requires certain disclosures. A fair value hierarchy is used which is
categorized into three levels based on the inputs to the valuation
techniques used to measure fair value. Certain valuation techniques are used,
such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach
(present value of future income or cash flows) and the cost approach (cost to
replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost).
The
Company estimates that the carrying value of its financial instruments which
includes cash, line of credit and notes payable approximates fair value, as all
financial instruments are short term in nature or bear interest at variable
rates.
Concentrations
of credit risk
Financial
instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit
risk are cash and accounts receivable arising from its normal business
activities. The Company routinely assesses the financial strength of its
customers, based upon factors surrounding their credit risk, establishes an
allowance for doubtful accounts, and as a consequence believes that its accounts
receivable credit risk exposure beyond such allowances is limited. At September
30, 2009, receivables related to PNC Bank and National Digital Medical Archives
(“NDMA”) comprised approximately 32.9% and 15.9% of the Company’s accounts
receivable balance, respectively.
Cash
balances in banks are secured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
subject to certain limitations.
Income
taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes under an asset and liability approach that
requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected
future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s
financial statements or tax returns. In estimating future tax consequences, the
Company generally considers all expected future events other than enactments of
changes in the tax laws or rates.
The
Company records a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax assets to the
amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The Company’s current
valuation allowance primarily relates to benefits from the Company’s net
operating losses.
Prior to
recording its income tax liability, the Company makes a determination as to
whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon
examination based upon the technical merits of the position. If the
more-likely-than-not threshold is met, the tax position is measured to determine
the amount to recognize in the financial statements. At September 30, 2009, the
Company has no unrecognized tax benefits. As of September 30, 2009, the Company
had no accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax
positions.
Use
of estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Note 2 - Going Concern
The
Company has incurred net losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
the years ended December 31, 2004 through 2008, negative cash flows from
operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and the years
ended December 31, 2004 through 2008, and had an accumulated deficit of $72.1
million at September 30, 2009. The Company has relied upon cash from its
financing activities to fund its ongoing operations as it has not been able to
generate sufficient cash from its operating activities in the past, and there is
no assurance that it will be able to do so in the future. Due to this history of
losses and operating cash consumption, the Company cannot predict how
long it will continue to incur further losses or whether it will
become profitable again, or if the Company’s business will improve. These
factors raise substantial doubt as to its ability to continue as a going
concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the
possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or
the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome
of this uncertainty.
As
of September 30, 2009, the Company had a cash balance of approximately $31,473,
compared to $0.3 million at December 31, 2008, and a working capital deficiency
of $0.9 million.
The
liquidity issues that have resulted from the Company’s history of losses have
been addressed in the past through the sale of Company common stock, preferred
stock and by entering into various debt instruments. During 2008, the Company
issued 10% Convertible Unsecured Notes and warrants to purchase Company common
stock in exchange for $450,000 cash. During September and October 2009, these
notes have been repaid by the Company. Additionally, in 2008 the Company and TAG
Virgin Islands, Inc. executed a Stock Purchase Agreement whereby an investor
represented by TAG Virgin Islands, Inc. purchased 2,500,000 shares of Company
common stock for a total investment of $200,000.
The
Company executed a revolving line of credit agreement in March 2008 with Access
Capital, Inc. (“Access Capital” or “Access”). As of June 30, 2008, the Company
was in default of the Loan and Security Agreement and remains in default as of
September 30, 2009. As a result of the default, Access has increased the
interest rate payable on borrowings under the line of credit to 18% per annum,
has notified the Company’s clients of their security interest in the amounts due
to the Company, and has provided instruction that payments are to be made
directly to Access Capital. Refer to footnote 4 of the Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on the Line of
Credit.
On June
7, 2004, the Company issued a five-year $2,000,000 Unsecured Convertible Line of
Credit Note. $950,000 of the original principal balance has previously been
converted to Company common stock and $550,000 has been repaid in cash prior to
the October 31, 2009 maturity. The remaining $500,000 balance has
been extended to April 30, 2012.
The
Company needs additional capital in order to survive. Additional capital will be
needed to fund current working capital requirements, ongoing debt service and to
repay the obligations that are maturing over the upcoming 12 month period. Our
primary sources of liquidity are cash flows from operations, borrowings under
our revolving credit facility, and various short and long term financings. We
plan to continue to strive to increase revenues and to control operating
expenses in order to reduce, or eliminate, the operating losses. Additionally,
we will continue to seek equity and/or debt financing in order to enable us to
continue to meet our financial obligations until we achieve profitability. There
can be no assurance that any such funding will be available to us on favorable
terms, or at all. Failure to obtain sufficient financing would have substantial
negative ramifications to the Company.
Note 3 - Recently Issued Accounting
Pronouncements
In
June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) established
the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as the source of
authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied to nongovernmental entities and
rules and interpretive releases of the SEC as authoritative GAAP for SEC
registrants. The Codification supersedes all the existing non-SEC accounting and
reporting standards upon its effective date and subsequently, the FASB will not
issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging
Issues Task Force Abstracts. This guidance is effective for interim periods
ending after September 15, 2009. We adopted this guidance for the period
ended September 30, 2009, with no effect on our consolidated results of
operations and financial condition for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
In
October 2009, the FASB issued Update No. 2009-13, which amends the
Revenue Recognition topic of the Codification. This update provides amendments
to the criteria in Subtopic 605-25 of the Codification for separating
consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements. As a result of those
amendments, multiple-deliverable arrangements will be separated in more
circumstances than under existing U.S. GAAP. The amendments establish a selling
price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable and will
replace the term fair
value in the revenue allocation guidance with selling price to clarify that
the allocation of revenue is based on entity-specific assumptions rather than
assumptions of a marketplace participant. The amendments will also eliminate the
residual method of allocation and require that arrangement consideration be
allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the
relative selling price method and will require that a vendor determine its best
estimate of selling price in a manner that is consistent with that used to
determine the price to sell the deliverable on a standalone basis. These
amendments will be effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into
or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010,
with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact the
adoption of this update might have on our consolidated results of operations and
financial condition.
In
October 2009, the FASB issued Update No. 2009-14, which amends the
Software topic of the Codification. The amendments in this update change the
accounting model for revenue arrangements that include both tangible products
and software elements. Tangible products containing software components and
nonsoftware components that function together to deliver the tangible product’s
essential functionality are no longer within the scope of the software revenue
guidance in Subtopic 985-605 of the Codification. In addition, the amendments in
this update require that hardware components of a tangible product containing
software components always be excluded from the software revenue guidance. In
that regard, the amendments provide additional guidance on how to determine
which software, if any, relating to the tangible product also would be excluded
from the scope of the software revenue guidance. The amendments also provide
guidance on how a vendor should allocate arrangement consideration to
deliverables in an arrangement that includes both tangible products and
software. The amendments also provide further guidance on how to allocate
arrangement consideration when an arrangement includes deliverables both
included and excluded from the scope of the software revenue guidance. These
amendments will be effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into
or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010,
with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact the
adoption of this update might have on our consolidated results of operations and
financial condition.
During
the first and second quarters of 2009, we adopted the following accounting
guidance, none of which had a material effect on our consolidated results of
operations or financial condition:
In
June 2008, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for earnings per
share, which establishes that unvested share-based payment awards that contain
non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating
securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share
pursuant to the two-class method. In contrast, the right to receive dividends or
dividend equivalents that the holder will forfeit if the award does not vest
does not constitute a participation right and such an award does not meet the
definition of a participating security in its current form (that is, prior to
the requisite service having been rendered for the award). We adopted this
guidance as of January 1, 2009. The adoption of this guidance had no effect
on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
In
April 2009, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for financial
instruments. The guidance requires disclosures about fair value of financial
instruments in interim financial statements as well as in annual financial
statements. This guidance is effective for interim periods ending after
June 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance had no material effect on our
consolidated results of operations and financial condition for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009.
In
April 2009, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for fair value
measurements and disclosures to provide additional guidance in determining
whether a market for a financial asset is not active and a transaction is not
distressed for fair value measurement purposes. This guidance is effective for
interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted this guidance for
the period ending June 30, 2009. The adoption of this guidance had no
effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
In
April 2009, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for investments in
debt and equity securities to provide guidance in determining whether
impairments in debt securities are other-than-temporary, and modifies the
presentation and disclosures surrounding such instruments. This guidance is
effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted the
provisions of this guidance for the period ending June 30, 2009. The
adoption of this guidance had no effect on our consolidated results of
operations and financial condition for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
In
May 2009, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for subsequent
events, which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of
events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements
are issued or are available to be issued. This guidance is effective for
financial statements issued for interim and annual reporting periods ending
after June 15, 2009. We adopted this guidance for the period ended
June 30, 2009, and have provided the disclosures required for the period
ending September 30, 2009.
Note
4 - Line of credit
The
Company executed a revolving line of credit agreement in March 2008 with Access
Capital. This line of credit provides for borrowing up to a maximum of
$3,500,000, based upon collateral availability, a 90% advance rate against
eligible accounts receivable, has a three year term, and an interest rate of
prime (which was 3.25% as of September 30, 2009) plus 2.75% prior to a default,
but 18% upon default. The Company has pledged substantilly all of its
assets as collateral for this debt. The Company must comply with a minimum
working capital covenant which requires the Company to maintain minimum monthly
working capital of $400,000. The Company was not in compliance with this
covenant as of June 30, 2008 and remains in default as of September 30, 2009.
Additionally, during the second year of the three year term the Company must
maintain a minimum average monthly loan balance of $2,250,000 and $2,500,000 in
the third year. The Company must also pay an annual facility fee equal to 1% of
the maximum available under the facility and a $1,750 per month collateral
management fee. Further debt incurred by the Company may need to be subordinated
to Access Capital, Inc.
The
Company was in default of the Loan and Security Agreement as of September 30,
2009 since its working capital was below the minimum required working capital of
$400,000. In the event of a default under the Loan and Security Agreement,
Access Capital’s remedies include, but are not limited to, the
following:
|
·
|
Access
may perform or observe such covenant on behalf and in the name, place and
stead of the Company and may take actions which they deem necessary to
cure or correct such failure, including, but not limited to, payment of
taxes, satisfaction of liens, performance of obligations owed to debtors,
procurement of insurance, execution of assignments, security agreements
and financing statements and the endorsement of
instruments;
|
|
·
|
upon
the occurrence of, and for so long as any event of default exists, the
interest rate is increased to one and one-half percent (1.5%) per
month;
|
|
·
|
Access
may notify the Company’s account debtors of their security interest in the
accounts, collect them directly and charge the collection costs and
expenses to the Company’s account;
|
|
·
|
at
Access Capital’s election, following the occurrence of an event of
default, they may terminate the Loan and Security Agreement. In the event
of early termination after the occurrence of default, the Company would be
liable for various early payment fees, penalties and
interest;
|
|
·
|
Access
shall have the right to demand repayment in full of all obligations,
whether or not otherwise due, including required prepayment fees,
interest, and penalties.
|
As a
result of this default, to date, Access has increased the interest rate payable
on borrowings under the line of credit to 18% per annum, has notified the
Company’s clients of their security interest in the amounts due to the Company,
and has provided instruction that payments are to be made directly to Access
Capital.
As of
September 30, 2009, $3.1 million was outstanding under the line of credit and
the annual interest rate remained at 18%.
Note
5 - Stock Based Compensation
The 2003
Incentive Plan (“2003 Plan”) authorizes the issuance of up to 10,000,000 shares
of common stock for issuance upon exercise of options. It also authorizes the
issuance of stock appreciation rights and restricted stock, however, none have
been issued. The options granted may be a combination of both incentive and
nonstatutory options, generally vest over a three year period from the date of
grant, and expire ten years from the date of grant.
To the
extent that CSI derives a tax benefit from options exercised by employees, such
benefit will be credited to additional paid-in capital when realized on the
Company’s income tax return. There were no tax benefits realized by the Company
during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 or during the years ended
December 31, 2008 or 2007.
The
following summarizes the stock option transactions under the 2003 Plan during
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
5,204,997 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
Options
granted
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Options
exercised
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Options
canceled
|
|
|
(365,666 |
) |
|
|
0.77 |
|
Options
outstanding at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
4,839,331 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
The
following table summarizes information concerning outstanding and exercisable
Company common stock options at September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Range of exercise
|
|
Options
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
average
|
|
prices
|
|
outstanding
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
contractual life
|
|
|
exercisable
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.25-$0.30
|
|
|
2,009,999 |
|
|
$ |
0.260 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
1,349,983 |
|
|
$ |
0.260 |
|
$0.46-$0.60
|
|
|
1,005,000 |
|
|
|
0.461 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
1,005,000 |
|
|
|
0.461 |
|
$0.83
|
|
|
1,204,000 |
|
|
|
0.830 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
1,204,000 |
|
|
|
0.830 |
|
$2.475-$3.45
|
|
|
620,332 |
|
|
|
2.750 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
620,332 |
|
|
|
2.750 |
|
|
|
|
4,839,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,179,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
In
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the Company recorded
approximately $3,544 and $115,965 and $169,753 and $449,178 of expense related
to stock options which vested during the three and nine months ended September
30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Note 6 – Earnings (loss) Per
Share
Basic
earnings (loss) per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is
computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding plus the effect of outstanding stock options using the “treasury
stock” method and the effect of convertible debt instruments as if they had been
converted at the beginning of each period presented.
The
following is a reconciliation of net income available to common stockholders for
purposes of basic earnings per share to net income available to common
stockholders for purposes of diluted earnings per share for each of the periods
noted:
|
|
For the three months ended September 30,
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss) attributable to common stockholders for purposes of
computing basic earnings per share
|
|
$ |
1,152,618 |
|
|
$ |
(4,360,850 |
) |
|
$ |
(861,504 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,850,393 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of dividends on conversion of convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Effect
of interest on conversion of $50,000, 10% convertible short term note
dated October 2, 2008
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Effect
of interest on $200,000, 10% convertible short term notes dated July 28,
2008
|
|
|
4,946 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Effect
of interest on $200,000, 10% convertible short term note dated September
2, 2008
|
|
|
3,533 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Effect
of interest on conversion of line of credit note dated June 7,
2004
|
|
|
18,375 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income attributable to common stockholders for purposes of computing
diluted earnings per share
|
|
$ |
1,225,722 |
|
|
$ |
(4,360,850 |
) |
|
$ |
(861,504 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,850,393 |
) |
The following is a reconciliation of
basic to diluted shares outstanding:
|
|
For the three months ended September 30,
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
shares outstanding
|
|
|
119,895,174 |
|
|
|
117,909,029 |
|
|
|
119,813,903 |
|
|
|
114,348,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
weighted average shares attributable to convertible securities and
warrants:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$50,000,
10% convertible short term note dated October 2, 2008
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
$200,000,
10% convertible short term notes dated July 28, 2008
|
|
|
2,472,826 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
$200,000,
10% convertible short term note dated September 2, 2008
|
|
|
1,766,304 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Warrant
exercises using treasury stock method
|
|
|
50,541 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Convertible
preferred stock Series A
|
|
|
3,800,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Convertible
preferred stock Series B
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Shares
underlying convertible line of credit note dated June 7,
2004
|
|
|
666,667 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
shares outstanding
|
|
|
133,651,512 |
|
|
|
117,909,029 |
|
|
|
119,813,903 |
|
|
|
114,348,981 |
|
Potentially dilutive shares excluded
from the calculation as their effect would be anti-dilutive:
|
|
For the three months ended September 30,
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
stock options which are anti-dilutive
|
|
|
4,839,331 |
|
|
|
5,438,330 |
|
|
|
4,839,331 |
|
|
|
5,438,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
which are anti-dilutive
|
|
|
68,137,052 |
|
|
|
68,191,505 |
|
|
|
69,191,505 |
|
|
|
68,191,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
underlying convertible line of credit note dated June 7,
2004
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
666,667 |
|
|
|
666,667 |
|
|
|
666,667 |
|
$50,000,
10% convertible short term note dated October 2, 2008
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
$200,000,
10% convertible short term notes dated July 28, 2008
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
$200,000,
10% convertible short term note dated September 2, 2008
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
Convertible
preferred stock Series A which are anti-dilutive
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,800,000 |
|
|
|
3,800,000 |
|
|
|
3,800,000 |
|
Convertible
preferred stock Series B which are anti-dilutive
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
72,976,383 |
|
|
|
87,096,502 |
|
|
|
88,497,503 |
|
|
|
87,096,502 |
|
Note
7 - Major Customers
During
the three months ended September 30, 2009, the Company had sales relating to two
major customers, PNC Bank and NDMA which comprised 38.7% and 15.7% of revenues,
respectively, and totaled approximately $4,385,557. Amounts due from services
provided to these customers included in accounts receivable was approximately
$2,470,226 at September 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, receivables related
to PNC Bank and NDMA accounted for approximately 32.9% and 16.0% of the
Company’s accounts receivable balance, respectively.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company had sales relating to
three major customers, PNC Bank, Bank of America and NDMA, which comprised
26.5%, 10.7% and 11.7% of revenues, respectively, and totaling
approximately $4,700,230, $1,903,355 and $2,067,245, respectively. Amounts due
from services provided to these customers included in accounts receivable was
approximately $2,844,581 at September 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009,
receivables related to PNC Bank, Bank of America and NDMA accounted for
approximately 32.9%, 7.4% and 15.9% of the Company’s accounts receivable
balance, respectively.
During
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company had revenue
relating to two major customers, Bank of America and LEC, a related party,
comprising 21.1% and 21.4% and 10.6% and 12.2% of revenues, and totaling
approximately $1,051,000 and $3,060,000 and $527,000 and $1,742,000,
respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Company also
had revenues from one additional major customer, NDMA, comprising 12.7% of
revenues, and totaling approximately $634,000. Amounts due from services
provided to these customers included in accounts receivable was approximately
$1,706,320 at September 30, 2008. As of September 30, 2008, receivables related
to services performed for Bank of America, LEC and NDMA accounted for
approximately 23.4%, 8.6% and 16.5% of the Company’s accounts receivable
balance, respectively.
Note
8 - Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Proceedings
From time
to time, the Company is either a defendant or the plaintiff in various claims
and lawsuits. Although there can be no assurances, management believes that the
disposition of such matters will not have a material adverse impact on the
results or operations or financial position of the Company.
Lease
Commitments
Years Ending September 30
|
|
Office
|
|
|
Sublease
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$ |
369,349 |
|
|
$ |
134,137 |
|
|
$ |
235,212 |
|
2011
|
|
|
93,455 |
|
|
|
35,770 |
|
|
|
57,685 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
$ |
462,804 |
|
|
$ |
169,907 |
|
|
$ |
292,897 |
|
Effective
February 2007, the Company subleased a portion of its East Hanover, New Jersey
corporate office space for the remainder of the lease term. 7,154 square feet of
the Company’s 16,604 square feet of rented office space were subleased from
February 15, 2007 to December 31, 2010. The sublease provides for three months
of free rent to the sublessee, monthly rent equal to $5,962 per month from May
15, 2007 to December 31, 2007, $8,942 per month from January 1, 2008 to December
31, 2009, and $11,923 per month from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
Additionally, the Company will receive a fixed rental for electric of $10,731
per annum payable in equal monthly installments throughout the term of the
lease.
Note 9 - Related Party
Transactions
Refer to
footnote 7 for the related party transaction disclosure as a major
customer.
As of
September 30, 2009, the balance outstanding with respect to the loan from Glenn
Peipert, our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, to the
Company was approximately $0.1 million, which accrues interest at a simple rate
of 8% per annum.
Note
10 - Subsequent Events
In
October 2008, the Company and TAG Virgin Islands, Inc. executed a promissory
note whereby certain investors represented by TAG Virgin Islands, Inc. provided
$50,000 to the Company under a short-term promissory note. The Company repaid
this note in October 2009.
On June
7, 2004, the Company issued a five-year $2,000,000 Unsecured Convertible Line of
Credit Note. $950,000 of the original principal balance has previously been
converted to Company common stock and $550,000 has been repaid in cash during
October 2009. The remaining $500,000 balance has been extended to April 30,
2012.
These
financial statements were approved by management and the board of directors and
were issued on November 12, 2009. Management has evaluated subsequent events
through this date.
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Special
Note About Forward-Looking Statements
Certain
statements in Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”), other than
purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements
relating to our business plans, objectives, and expected operating results, and
the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking
statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements generally
are identified by the words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,”
“estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,”
“will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. Forward-looking
statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to
risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from
the forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise
publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
future events or otherwise.
Overview
of our Business
Conversion
Services International, Inc. provides professional services to the Global 2000,
as well as mid-market clientele relating to strategic consulting, business
intelligence/data warehousing and data management and, through strategic
partners, the sale of software. The Company’s services based clients are
primarily in the financial services, pharmaceutical, healthcare and
telecommunications industries, although it has clients in other industries as
well. The Company’s clients are primarily located in the northeastern United
States.
The
Company began operations in 1990. Its services were originally focused on
e-business solutions and data warehousing. In the late 1990s, the Company
strategically repositioned itself to capitalize on its data warehousing
expertise in the fast growing business intelligence/data warehousing space. The
Company became a public company via its merger with a wholly owned subsidiary of
LCS Group, Inc., effective January 30, 2004.
The
Company’s core strategy includes capitalizing on the already established
in-house business intelligence/data warehousing (“BI/DW”) technical expertise
and its strategic consulting division. This is expected to result in organic
growth through the addition of new customers.
The
Company derives a majority of its revenue from professional services
engagements. Its revenue depends on the Company’s ability to generate new
business, in addition to preserving present client engagements. The general
domestic economic conditions in the industries the Company serves, the pace of
technological change, and the business requirements and practices of its clients
and potential clients directly affect our ability to accomplish these goals.
When economic conditions decline, companies generally decrease their technology
budgets and reduce the amount of spending on the type of information technology
(IT) consulting provided by the Company. The Company’s revenue is also impacted
by the rate per hour it is able to charge for its services and by the size and
chargeability, or utilization rate, of its professional workforce. If the
Company is unable to maintain its billing rates or sustain appropriate
utilization rates for its professionals, its overall profitability may decline.
Several large clients have changed their business practices with respect to
consulting services. Such clients now require that we contract with their vendor
management organizations in order to continue to perform services. These
organizations charge fees generally based upon the hourly rates being charged to
the end client. Our revenues and gross margins are being negatively affected by
this practice.
The
Company will continue to focus on a variety of growth initiatives in order to
improve its market share and increase revenue. Moreover, as the Company
endeavors to achieve top line growth, through entry on new approved vendor
lists, penetrating new vertical markets, and expanding its time and material
business, the Company will concentrate its efforts on improving margins and
driving earnings to the bottom line.
The
Company’s most significant costs are personnel expenses, which consist of
consultant fees, benefits and payroll-related expenses.
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth selected financial data for the periods
indicated:
|
|
Selected
Statement of Operations Data for the three
|
|
|
Selected
Statement of Operations Data for the nine
|
|
|
|
months
ended September 30,
|
|
|
months
ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
revenue
|
|
$ |
8,061,242 |
|
|
$ |
4,986,773 |
|
|
$ |
17,734,250 |
|
|
$ |
14,327,368 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
2,946,980 |
|
|
|
1,281,688 |
|
|
|
4,671,895 |
|
|
|
3,318,702 |
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
|
1,292,618 |
|
|
|
(4,211,772 |
) |
|
|
(441,504 |
) |
|
|
(8,397,614 |
) |
Net
income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
|
|
1,152,618 |
|
|
|
(4,360,850 |
) |
|
|
(861,504 |
) |
|
|
(8,850,393 |
) |
Basic
and diluted income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
income (loss) per common share attributable to common
stockholders
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
Diluted
income (loss) per common share attributable to common
stockholders
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
Selected
Statement of Financial Position Data as of
|
|
|
|
September
30, 2009
|
|
|
December
31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working
capital deficiency
|
|
$ |
(928,605 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,296,278 |
) |
Total
assets
|
|
|
5,337,007 |
|
|
|
4,578,885 |
|
Total
stockholders' deficit
|
|
|
(2,663,584 |
) |
|
|
(2,029,296 |
) |
Three and Nine Months Ended September
30, 2009 and 2008
Revenue
The
Company’s revenue is primarily comprised of billings to clients for consulting
hours worked on client projects. Revenue of $8.1 million and $17.7 million for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, increased by
$3.1 million, or 61.7%, and $3.4 million, or 23.8%, as compared to revenue of
$5.0 million and $14.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008, respectively.
Revenue
for the Company is categorized by strategic consulting, business intelligence,
data warehousing and data management. The chart below reflects revenue by line
of business for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008:
|
|
For
the three months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
of total revenues
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
of total revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic
Consulting
|
|
$ |
3,461,912 |
|
|
|
43.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,389,418 |
|
|
|
27.9 |
% |
Business
Intelligence / Data Warehousing
|
|
|
3,549,373 |
|
|
|
44.0 |
% |
|
|
2,846,385 |
|
|
|
57.1 |
% |
Data
Management
|
|
|
531,142 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
527,272 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
Reimbursable
expenses
|
|
|
410,470 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
186,158 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
Other
|
|
|
108,345 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
37,540 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
$ |
8,061,242 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
4,986,773 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
For
the nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
of total revenues
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
of total revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic
Consulting
|
|
$ |
6,556,062 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
% |
|
$ |
3,952,765 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
% |
Business
Intelligence / Data Warehousing
|
|
|
8,628,645 |
|
|
|
48.7 |
% |
|
|
7,982,360 |
|
|
|
55.7 |
% |
Data
Management
|
|
|
1,567,211 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
1,741,597 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
% |
Reimbursable
expenses
|
|
|
855,427 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
498,408 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
Other
|
|
|
126,905 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
152,238 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
$ |
17,734,250 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
14,327,368 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Strategic
consulting
The
strategic consulting line of business includes work related to planning and
assessing people, process and technology for clients, performing gap analysis,
making recommendations regarding technology and business process improvements to
assist clients to realize their business goals and maximize their investments in
both people and technology. The Company performs strategic consulting work
through its CSI DeLeeuw division.
Strategic
consulting revenue of $3.5 million, or 43.0% of total revenue, for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 increased by $2.1 million as compared to revenue
of $1.4 million, or 27.9% of total revenue, for the three months ended September
30, 2008. This increase is primarily due to $3.1 million increase in revenue
related to a project at PNC Bank that began in April 2009. This was partially
offset by a $0.6 million decrease in revenues from Bank of America as compared
to the prior year and an additional $0.4 million of decreases related to various
clients. In the strategic consulting line of business, there was a 50.0%
increase in consultant headcount and a 76.4% increase in the average bill rate
during the quarter, as compared to the prior year period. The Company
anticipates that revenue related to the PNC Bank project will continue into the
first half of 2010.
Strategic consulting revenue of $6.6
million, or 37.0% of total revenue, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
increased by $2.6 million, or 65.9%, as compared to revenue of $4.0 million, or
27.6% of total revenue, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This
increase is primarily due to a $4.7 million increase in revenue related to a
project at PNC Bank that began in April 2009. This increase was partially offset
by a $1.2 million decrease in revenue from Bank of America, a $0.4 million
decrease in revenue from New York Independent System Operator, and $0.5 million
of decreases from various other clients. In the strategic consulting line of
business, there was a 16.7% increase in consultant headcount and a 42.7% increase in the
average bill rate year to date, as compared to the prior year
period.
Business
intelligence / Data warehousing
The
business intelligence line of business includes work performed with various
applications and technologies for gathering, storing, analyzing and providing
clients with access to data in order to allow enterprise users to make better
and quicker business decisions. The data warehousing line of business includes
work performed for client companies to provide a consolidated view of high
quality enterprise information. CSI provides services in the data warehouse and
data mart design, development and implementation, prepares proof of concepts,
implements data warehouse solutions and integrates enterprise information. Since
the business intelligence and data warehousing work overlap and the Company has
performed engagements which include both business intelligence and data
warehousing components, the Company tracks this work as a single line of
business and reports the results as a single line of business.
Business
intelligence/data warehousing (“BI/DW”) revenue of $3.5 million, or 44.0% of
total revenue, for the three months ended September 30, 2009 increased by $0.7
million, or 24.7%, as compared to revenue of $2.8 million, or 57.1% of total
revenue, for the three months ended September 30, 2008. This increase is
primarily due to a $1.0 million revenue increase due to projects for Church
& Dwight, Johnson and Johnson, Moody’s and Flight Safety, partially offset
by $0.9 million of revenue reductions due to both completed projects and reduced
revenue on assignments with continuing clients and the recognition during the
quarter ended September 30, 2009 of $0.6 million of revenue related to NDMA
which is being recognized on the cash basis and had previously been deferred.
Overall, the BI/DW line of business had a 14.5% increase in consultant headcount
and a decrease of 8.4% in the utilization rate as compared to the prior
period.
Business
intelligence/data warehousing (“BI/DW”) revenue of $8.6 million, or 48.7% of
total revenue, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 increased by $0.6
million, or 8.1%, as compared to revenue of $8.0 million, or 55.7% of total
revenue, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. New 2009 projects in this
line of business contributed $2.2 million to revenue during the nine month
period ended September 30, 2009, which is offset by $1.6 million of
non-recurring revenue related to completed projects. Average BI/DW headcount
increased 5.4%, average bill rate and consultant utilization remained constant
overall for the nine month period ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the
prior year. Additionally, $0.2 million of billings related to NDMA
for work performed during the first nine months of 2009 was deferred and will be
recognized as revenue upon collection of the outstanding
receivable.
Data management
The data
management line of business includes such activities as Enterprise Information
Architecture, Metadata Management, Data Quality/Cleansing/ Profiling. The
Company performs these activities through its exclusive subcontractor agreement
with its related party, LEC.
Data
management revenue of $0.5 million, or 6.6% of total revenue, for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 remained unchanged as compared to revenue of
$0.5 million, or 10.6% of total revenue, for the three months ended September
30, 2008. While the revenue for the quarter remained unchanged, the data
management line of business experienced a 32.1% decrease in billable hours and a
21.0% decrease in the utilization rate, which was offset by a 47.9% increase in
the average bill rate during the current period as compared to the prior
year.
Data
management revenue of $1.6 million, or 8.8% of total revenue, for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 decreased by $0.1 million, or 10.0%, as compared
to revenue of $1.7 million, or 12.2% of total revenue, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. This decrease is due to a 31.7% decrease in
billable hours and a 24.3% decrease in the utilization rate, partially offset by
a 33.0% increase in the average bill rate during the current year to date period
as compared to the prior year.
Cost
of revenue
Cost
of revenue includes payroll and benefit and other direct costs for the Company’s
consultants. Cost of revenue was $5.1 million, or 63.4% of revenue, and $13.1
million, or 73.7% of revenue, for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009, respectively, representing an increase of $1.4 million, or 38.0%, and $2.1
million, or 18.7%, as compared to $3.7 million, or 74.3% of revenue, and $11.0
million, or 76.8% of revenue, for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008, respectively.
Cost
of services was $4.2 million, or 60.1% of services revenue for the three months
ended September 30, 2009, representing an increase of $1.2 million, or 41.4%, as
compared to $3.0 million, or 70.4% of services revenue for the three months
ended September 30, 2008. Cost of services
increased during the three months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the
prior year due to a $2.8 million increase in services revenue during the period,
accounting for a $1.3 million increase in cost of services. The increase in the
cost of services, as compared to the revenue increase reflects the higher profit
margin business that the Company has been obtaining in the current period.
Partially offsetting this increase in cost of services is a $0.1 million
decrease in cost of services relating to a reduction in stock compensation
expense. The Company had an average of 108 consultants in the current period and
85 in the prior year period, resulting in a 27.1% increase in consultant
headcount.
Cost of services was $10.7 million, or
70.4% of services revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
representing an increase of $1.9 million, or 22.1%, as compared to $8.8 million,
or 73.4% of services revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Cost
of services increased during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as
compared to the prior year period primarily due to increased revenue during the
period, accounting for a $1.9 million increase in cost of services. Cost of
services decreased 3.0% of services revenue as compared to the prior period due
to a $0.2 million deferral of revenue related to billings to NDMA during the
current period. Although the cost of services has already been recognized, this
revenue will be recognized when payment is received from the
client.
Cost of
related party services was $0.5 million, or 87.7% of related party services
revenue, for the three months ended September 30, 2009, remaining unchanged as
compared to $0.5 million, or 95.9% of related party services revenue, for the
three months ended September 30, 2008.
Cost of
related party services was $1.4 million, or 89.9% of related party services
revenue, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, representing a decrease
of $0.2 million, or 13.6%, as compared to $1.6 million, or 93.7% of related
party services revenue, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Cost of
related party services decreased for the nine month period primarily due to a
decrease in related party consulting revenue during the three months ended
September 30, 2009 as compared to the prior year.
Gross
profit
Gross
profit was $2.9 million, or 36.6% of revenue, and $4.7 million, or 26.3% of
revenue, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively,
representing an increase of $1.6 million, or 129.9% for the three months and an
increase of $1.4 million, or 40.8% for the nine months, as compared to $1.3
million, or 25.7% of revenue, and $3.3 million, or 23.2% of revenue, for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively.
Gross
profit from services was $2.8 million, or 39.9% of services revenue for the
three months ended September 30, 2009, representing an increase of $1.5 million,
or 122.8%, from the prior year’s gross profit from services of $1.3 million, or
29.6% of services revenue. The increase in the gross profit from services as a
percentage of services revenue has been outlined previously in the revenue and
cost of revenue discussions.
Gross profit from services was $4.5
million, or 29.6% of services revenue for the nine months ended September 30,
2009, representing an increase of $1.3 million, or 41.4%, from the prior year’s
gross profit from services of $3.2 million, or 26.6% of services revenue. The
increase in the gross profit from services as a percentage of services revenue
has been outlined previously in the revenue and cost of revenue
discussions.
Gross
profit from related party services was $65,587, or 12.3% of related party
services revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2009, representing an
increase of $44,120 from the prior year’s gross profit of $21,467, or 4.1% of
related party services revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
The increase in the gross profit from related party services as a percentage of
related party services revenue has been outlined previously in the revenue and
cost of revenue discussions.
Gross
profit from related party services was $158,604, or 10.1% of related party
services revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, representing an
increase of $48,107, or 43.5% from the prior year’s gross profit of $110.497, or
6.3% of related party services revenue for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. The increase in the gross profit from related party services as a
percentage of related party services revenue has been outlined previously in the
revenue and cost of revenue discussions.
Selling
and marketing
Selling
and marketing expenses include payroll, employee benefits and other
headcount-related costs associated with sales and marketing personnel and
advertising, promotions, tradeshows, seminars and other programs. Selling and
marketing expenses were $0.7 million, or 9.0% of revenue, and $2.3 million, or
12.9% of revenue, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively, decreasing by $0.2 million, or 18.9%, and $0.3 million, or 11.6%,
as compared to $0.9 million, or 18.0% of revenue, and $2.6 million, or 18.1% of
revenue, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
respectively.
Selling
and marketing expense for the three months ended September 30, 2009 decreased by
$0.2 million as compared to the prior year due primarily to a $0.1 million
reduction in payroll and stock compensation expense and a $0.1 million reduction
in professional fees and trade show expense.
Selling
and marketing expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 decreased by
$0.3 million as compared to the prior year due primarily to a $0.2 million
reduction in payroll and stock compensation expense and a $0.1 million reduction
in professional fees.
General
and administrative
General
and administrative costs include payroll, employee benefits and other
headcount-related costs associated with the finance, legal, facilities, certain
human resources and other administrative headcount, and legal and other
professional and administrative fees. General and administrative costs were $0.7
million, or 9.0% of revenue, and $1.9 million, or 11.2% of revenue, for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, decreasing by $0.2
million, or 22.7%, and $1.1 million, or 35.1%, as compared to $0.9 million, or
18.8% of revenue, and $3.0 million, or 21.3% of revenue, for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008, respectively.
The $0.2
million decrease in general and administrative expense for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the prior year is primarily due to a
$0.1 million reduction in payroll and stock compensation expense due primarily
to a reduction in headcount and a $0.1 million reduction in bad debt expense
during the current period.
The $1.1
million decrease in general and administrative expense for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 as compared to the prior year is primarily due to a $0.4
million reduction in payroll and stock option expense due to a reduction in
headcount, a $0.3 million reduction in bad debt expense, and $0.4 million for
expense reductions in the following categories: travel, utilities, bank fees,
investor relations, stock exchange listing fees, legal fees, investor relations,
rent, business licenses, business taxes and professional fees.
Goodwill
impairment
Generally accepted accounting
principles requires the Company to test intangible assets for impairment
annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the asset might be impaired. During the nine month period ended September 30,
2008, it was determined that William McKnight’s employment contract would not be
extended past its July 21, 2008 expiration date. As a result of this trigger
event, the Company performed an interim impairment analysis with respect to the
recorded goodwill relating to the McKnight Associates acquisition in the
approximate amount of $1.4 million and determined it to be fully impaired. A
$1.4 million goodwill impairment charge was recorded during the period ended
June 30, 2008. Additionally, during the period ended September 30, 2008, as a
result of a continued decline in strategic consulting revenues and gross margins
during 2008, the goodwill relating to the DeLeeuw Associates business was
evaluated and determined to be impaired. As a result of this evaluation, a $3.2
million goodwill impairment charge was recorded in the quarter ended September
30, 2008, resulting in total goodwill impairment charges during the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 of $4,636,266. There was no goodwill impairment charge
during the three or nine month periods ending September 30,
2009.
Depreciation
and amortization
Depreciation
expense is recorded on the Company’s property and equipment which is generally
depreciated over a period between three to seven years. Amortization of
leasehold improvements is taken over the shorter of the estimated useful life of
the asset or the remaining term of the lease. The Company amortizes deferred
financing costs utilizing the effective interest method over the term of the
related debt instrument. Depreciation and amortization expenses were $25,108 and
$81,512, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively,
representing a $37,297 and $142,562 decline from $62,405 and
$224,074 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
respectively.
Other
income (expense)
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded an impairment
with respect to its investment in its related party, LEC, and recorded a charge
of approximately $103,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the
Company restructured its debt with TAG Virgin Islands, Inc. and issued Company
common stock in repayment of $0.6 million of the Unsecured Convertible Note
dated June 7, 2004. A $0.6 million loss on the extinguishment of this debt was
recorded in March 2008.
Interest
expense, which includes amortization of the discount on debt of zero and $0.1
million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively
and $0.1 million and $0.2 million during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively, was $0.2 million and $0.7 million for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, and $0.3 million
and $0.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
respectively. Interest expense of $0.2 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 declined by $0.1 million as compared to the prior year
period. This reduction was due to $0.1 million of prior year charges related to
warrants issued that did not reoccur in the current period. Interest expense of
$0.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 remained unchanged as
compared to the prior year period.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The
Company has incurred net losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
the years ended December 31, 2004 through 2008, negative cash flows from
operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and the years
ended December 31, 2004 through 2008, and had an accumulated deficit of $72.1
million at September 30, 2009. The Company has relied upon cash from its
financing activities to fund its ongoing operations as it has not been able to
generate sufficient cash from its operating activities in the past, and there is
no assurance that it will be able to do so in the future. Due to this history of
losses and operating cash consumption, the Company cannot predict how
long it will continue to incur further losses or whether it will
become profitable again, or if the Company’s business will improve. These
factors raise substantial doubt as to its ability to continue as a going
concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the
possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or
the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome
of this uncertainty.
As
of September 30, 2009, the Company had a cash balance of approximately $31,473,
compared to $0.3 million at December 31, 2008, and a working capital deficiency
of $0.9 million.
The
liquidity issues that have resulted from the Company’s history of losses have
been addressed in the past through the sale of Company common stock, preferred
stock and by entering into various debt instruments. During 2008, the Company
issued 10% Convertible Unsecured Notes and warrants to purchase Company common
stock in exchange for $450,000 cash. During September and October 2009, these
notes have been repaid by the Company. Additionally, in 2008 the Company and TAG
Virgin Islands, Inc. executed a Stock Purchase Agreement whereby an investor
represented by TAG Virgin Islands, Inc. purchased 2,500,000 shares of Company
common stock for a total investment of $200,000.
The
Company executed a revolving line of credit agreement in March 2008 with Access
Capital, Inc. (“Access Capital” or “Access”). As of June 30, 2008, the Company
was in default of the Loan and Security Agreement and remains in default as of
September 30, 2009. As a result of the default, Access has increased the
interest rate payable on borrowings under the line of credit to 18% per annum,
has notified the Company’s clients of their security interest in the amounts due
to the Company, and has provided instruction that payments are to be made
directly to Access Capital. Refer to footnote 4 of the Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on the Line of
Credit.
On June
7, 2004, the Company issued a five-year $2,000,000 Unsecured Convertible Line of
Credit Note. $950,000 of the original principal balance has previously been
converted to Company common stock and $550,000 has been repaid in cash prior to
the October 31, 2009 maturity. The remaining $500,000 balance has
been extended to April 30, 2012.
The
Company needs additional capital in order to survive. Additional capital will be
needed to fund current working capital requirements, ongoing debt service and to
repay the obligations that are maturing over the upcoming 12 month period. Our
primary sources of liquidity are cash flows from operations, borrowings under
our revolving credit facility, and various short and long term financings. We
plan to continue to strive to increase revenues and to control operating
expenses in order to reduce, or eliminate, the operating losses. Additionally,
we will continue to seek equity and/or debt financing in order to enable us to
continue to meet our financial obligations until we achieve profitability. There
can be no assurance that any such funding will be available to us on favorable
terms, or at all. Failure to obtain sufficient financing would have substantial
negative ramifications to the Company.
The
Company’s working capital deficit was $0.9 million as of September 30, 2009
which represented a $0.4 million decrease in the working capital deficit when
compared to the working capital deficit of $1.3 million as of December 31, 2008.
The primary reason for the decrease in the working capital deficit is a $0.3
million reduction in cash, a $0.7 million increase in the outstanding line of
credit balance, a $0.1 million increase in deferred revenue, a $0.5 million
increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses and a $0.1 million decrease in
prepaid expenses, partially offset by a $1.3 million increase in the accounts
receivable balance and a $0.8 million decrease in short term notes payable as
compared to the prior period. The short term notes payable decreased by $0.8
million due to both the repayment of short term notes and the reclassification
of $0.5 million of short term notes payable to long term debt resulting from the
extension of the note payable to April 2012.
Cash used
in operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
approximately $0.6 million compared to cash used in operating activities of $1.9
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease in cash used
in operations was primarily the result of a $1.3 million reduction in the
Company’s net loss adjusted for non-cash charges/credits recorded in income,
such as depreciation, amortization, stock based compensation and bad debt
expense, as compared to the prior year period.
Cash used
in investing activities was $10,670 in the current period compared to $24,016
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The Company purchased computer
equipment during both the current period and the comparable prior year
period.
Cash
provided by financing activities was $0.3 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and cash provided by financing activities was $0.5 million
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The cash provided by financing
activities during the current period was due to additional borrowings under the
Company’s revolving line of credit agreement with Access Capital. The cash provided by
financing activities during the prior period was primarily the result of the
Company’s borrowing $0.4 million under short-term notes payable and obtaining
$0.2 million in exchange for issuing 2.5 million shares of Company common
stock.
The
Company executed a replacement revolving line of credit agreement in March 2008
with Access Capital, Inc. The Access Capital line of credit provides for
borrowing up to a maximum of $3,500,000, based upon collateral availability, a
90% advance rate against eligible accounts receivable, has a three year term,
and an interest rate of prime (which was 3.25% as of September 30, 2009) plus
2.75% prior to a default, but 18% upon default. The Company must comply with a
minimum working capital covenant which requires the Company to maintain minimum
monthly working capital of $400,000. The Company was not in compliance with this
requirement as of June 30, 2008 and remains in default as of September 30, 2009.
Additionally, during the first year of the three year term the Company must
maintain an average minimum monthly borrowing of $2,000,000 which increases the
$2,250,000 in the second year and to $2,500,000 in the third year. The Company
must also pay an annual facility fee equal to 1% of the maximum available under
the facility and a $1,750 per month collateral management fee. Further debt
incurred by the Company may need to be subordinated to Access Capital,
Inc.
On July
28, 2008, the Company issued 10% Convertible Unsecured Notes (the “Notes”) to
certain investors represented by TAG Virgin Islands, Inc. for $200,000. These
notes were originally due on December 27, 2008 and are convertible into
2,500,000 shares of common stock at the option of the holders. The maturity
dates of the Notes were extended to October 31, 2009 and have been repaid in
full during September 2009.
On
September 2, 2008, the Company issued a 10% Convertible Unsecured Note (the
“Note”) to certain investors represented by TAG Virgin Islands, Inc. for
$200,000. This note was originally due on March 1, 2009 and is convertible into
2,500,000 shares of common stock at the option of the holders. The maturity date
of the Note had been extended to September 1, 2009 and has been repaid in full
during September 2009.
On
October 2, 2008, the Company issued a 10% Convertible Unsecured Note (the
“Note”) to certain investors represented by TAG Virgin Islands, Inc. for
$50,000. This note was originally due on April 1, 2009 and is convertible into
1,000,000 shares of common stock at the option of the holders. The maturity date
of the Note was extended to October 31, 2009 and was repaid in full during
October 2009.
There are
currently no material commitments for capital expenditures.
As
of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had accounts receivable
due from LEC of approximately $0.4 million and $0.3 million,
respectively. There are no known collection problems with respect to
LEC.
For the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, we invoiced LEC $0.5
million and $1.6 million and $0.5 million and $1.7 million, respectively, for
the services of consultants subcontracted to LEC by us. The majority of its
billing is derived from Fortune 100 clients.
The
following is a summary of the debt instruments outstanding as of September 30,
2009:
Lender
|
|
Type of facility
|
|
|
Outstanding as of September
30, 2009 (not including
interest) (all numbers
approximate)
|
|
|
Remaining
Availability (if
applicable)
|
|
Access
Capital, Inc.
|
|
Line of Credit
|
|
|
$
|
3,076,000
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Taurus
Advisory Group, LLC / TAG Virgin Islands, Inc. Investors
|
|
Convertible Promissory Notes
|
|
|
$
|
1,100,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Glenn
Peipert
|
|
Promissory Note
|
|
|
$
|
109,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,285,000
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Additionally,
the Company has two series of preferred stock outstanding as
follows:
Holder
|
|
Type of Instrument
|
|
Principal amount
outstanding as of
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taurus
Advisory Group, LLC Investors
|
|
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
|
|
$
|
1,900,000
|
|
Matthew
J. Szulik
|
|
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
|
|
$
|
2,000,000
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,900,000
|
|
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In
June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) established
the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as the source of
authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied to nongovernmental entities and
rules and interpretive releases of the SEC as authoritative GAAP for SEC
registrants. The Codification supersedes all the existing non-SEC accounting and
reporting standards upon its effective date and subsequently, the FASB will not
issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging
Issues Task Force Abstracts. This guidance is effective for interim periods
ending after September 15, 2009. We adopted this guidance for the period
ended September 30, 2009, with no effect on our consolidated results of
operations and financial condition for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
In
October 2009, the FASB issued Update No. 2009-13, which amends the
Revenue Recognition topic of the Codification. This update provides amendments
to the criteria in Subtopic 605-25 of the Codification for separating
consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements. As a result of those
amendments, multiple-deliverable arrangements will be separated in more
circumstances than under existing U.S. GAAP. The amendments establish a selling
price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable and will
replace the term fair
value in the revenue allocation guidance with selling price to clarify that
the allocation of revenue is based on entity-specific assumptions rather than
assumptions of a marketplace participant. The amendments will also eliminate the
residual method of allocation and require that arrangement consideration be
allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the
relative selling price method and will require that a vendor determine its best
estimate of selling price in a manner that is consistent with that used to
determine the price to sell the deliverable on a standalone basis. These
amendments will be effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into
or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010,
with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact the
adoption of this update might have on our consolidated results of operations and
financial condition.
In
October 2009, the FASB issued Update No. 2009-14, which amends the
Software topic of the Codification. The amendments in this update change the
accounting model for revenue arrangements that include both tangible products
and software elements. Tangible products containing software components and
nonsoftware components that function together to deliver the tangible product’s
essential functionality are no longer within the scope of the software revenue
guidance in Subtopic 985-605 of the Codification. In addition, the amendments in
this update require that hardware components of a tangible product containing
software components always be excluded from the software revenue guidance. In
that regard, the amendments provide additional guidance on how to determine
which software, if any, relating to the tangible product also would be excluded
from the scope of the software revenue guidance. The amendments also provide
guidance on how a vendor should allocate arrangement consideration to
deliverables in an arrangement that includes both tangible products and
software. The amendments also provide further guidance on how to allocate
arrangement consideration when an arrangement includes deliverables both
included and excluded from the scope of the software revenue guidance. These
amendments will be effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into
or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010,
with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact the
adoption of this update might have on our consolidated results of operations and
financial condition.
During
the first and second quarters of 2009, we adopted the following accounting
guidance, none of which had a material effect on our consolidated results of
operations or financial condition:
In
June 2008, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for earnings per
share, which establishes that unvested share-based payment awards that contain
non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating
securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share
pursuant to the two-class method. In contrast, the right to receive dividends or
dividend equivalents that the holder will forfeit if the award does not vest
does not constitute a participation right and such an award does not meet the
definition of a participating security in its current form (that is, prior to
the requisite service having been rendered for the award). We adopted this
guidance as of January 1, 2009. The adoption of this guidance had no effect
on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
In
April 2009, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for financial
instruments. The guidance requires disclosures about fair value of financial
instruments in interim financial statements as well as in annual financial
statements. This guidance is effective for interim periods ending after
June 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance had no material effect on our
consolidated results of operations and financial condition for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009.
In
April 2009, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for fair value
measurements and disclosures to provide additional guidance in determining
whether a market for a financial asset is not active and a transaction is not
distressed for fair value measurement purposes. This guidance is effective for
interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted this guidance for
the period ending June 30, 2009. The adoption of this guidance had no
effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
In
April 2009, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for investments in
debt and equity securities to provide guidance in determining whether
impairments in debt securities are other-than-temporary, and modifies the
presentation and disclosures surrounding such instruments. This guidance is
effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted the
provisions of this guidance for the period ending June 30, 2009. The
adoption of this guidance had no effect on our consolidated results of
operations and financial condition for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
In
May 2009, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for subsequent
events, which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of
events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements
are issued or are available to be issued. This guidance is effective for
financial statements issued for interim and annual reporting periods ending
after June 15, 2009. We adopted this guidance for the period ended
June 30, 2009, and have provided the disclosures required for the period
ending September 30, 2009.
Application of
Critical Accounting Policies
Revenue
recognition
Our
revenue recognition policy is significant because revenues are a key component
of our results from operations. In addition, revenue recognition determines the
timing of certain expenses, such as incentive compensation. We follow very
specific and detailed guidelines in measuring revenue; however, certain
judgments and estimates affect the application of the revenue policy. Revenue
results are difficult to predict and any shortfall in revenue or delay in
recognizing revenue could cause operating results to vary significantly from
quarter to quarter and could result in future operating losses or reduced net
income.
Revenue
from consulting and professional services is recognized at the time the services
are performed on a project by project basis. For projects charged on a time and
materials basis, revenue is recognized based on the number of hours worked by
consultants at an agreed-upon rate per hour. For large services projects where
costs to complete the contract could reasonably be estimated, the Company
undertakes projects on a fixed-fee basis and recognizes revenue on the
percentage of completion method of accounting based on the evaluation of actual
costs incurred to date compared to total estimated costs. Revenue recognized in
excess of billings is recorded as cost in excess of billings. Billings in excess
of revenue recognized are recorded as deferred revenue until revenue recognition
criteria are met. Reimbursements, including those relating to travel and other
out-of-pocket expenses, are included in revenue, and an equivalent amount of
reimbursable expenses are included in cost of services.
The
Company recognizes revenue in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. As a result, in the event that collectability from a client is not
reasonably assured, revenue is recognized on the cash basis.
Deferred
Income Taxes
Determining
the consolidated provision for income tax expense, income tax liabilities and
deferred tax assets and liabilities involves judgment. We record a
valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount of future
tax benefit that is more likely than not to be realized. We have considered
future taxable income and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in
determining the need for a valuation allowance. A valuation allowance is
maintained by the Company due to the impact of the current years net operating
loss (NOL). In the event that we determine that we would not be able to realize
all or part of our net deferred tax assets, an adjustment to the deferred tax
assets would be charged to net income in the period such determination is made.
Likewise, if we later determine that it is more likely than not that the net
deferred tax assets would be realized, the previously provided valuation
allowance would be reversed. Our current valuation allowance relates
predominately to benefits derived from the utilization of our
NOL’s.
Item 4T. Controls and
Procedures
Evaluation
of disclosure controls and procedures.
As of the
end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report, the Company’s management,
with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer (“the Certifying Officers”), conducted evaluations of the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. As defined under Sections
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”), the term “disclosure controls and procedures” means controls
and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within
the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure
controls and procedures include without limitation, controls and procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the
reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to the issuer’s management, including the Certifying Officers, to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Based on this evaluation,
the Certifying Officers have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls
and procedures were not effective to ensure that material information is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported by management of the Company on a
timely basis in order to comply with the Company’s disclosure obligations under
the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder.
The Chief
Executive Officer’s and Chief Financial Officer’s conclusion regarding the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures is based solely on management’s
conclusion that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as
identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2008 continues to be ineffective as of September 30, 2009. In
connection with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008, our management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting was not effective based on
management’s identification of a lack of segregation of duties due to the small
number of employees dealing with general administrative and financial matters
and general controls over information security and user access. Also, the
Company’s Chief Financial Officer is the only person with an appropriate level
of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the selection, application
and implementation of generally accepted accounting principles as it relates to
complex transactions and financial reporting requirements.
Changes
in internal control over financial reporting.
No
significant changes were made in our internal control over financial reporting
during the Company’s third quarter of 2009 that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
From time
to time, the Company is either a defendant or the plaintiff in various claims
and lawsuits. Although there can be no assurances, management believes that the
disposition of such matters will not have a material adverse impact on the
results or operations or financial position of the Company.
Item 6.
Exhibits
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
SIGNATURE
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
Conversion
Services International, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Date:
November 12, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ Lori
Cohen
|
|
|
Lori
Cohen
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|