Edgar Filing: HEARTLAND, INC.

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-QSB

QUARTERLY REPORT

UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

HEARTLAND, INC.

(Exact name of small business registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland

--------------------------------

000-27045

--------------------------------

36-4286069

----------------------------------------------

(State or other jurisdiction

of incorporation or organization))

(Commission File Number)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

3300 Fernbrook Lane North, Suite 180

Plymouth, MN 55447

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

763.557.2900

(Registrant’s telephone no., including area code)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes xNo o

Number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of August 22, 2005 was: 21,380,801

Traditional Small Business Disclosure Format: Yes o

No x

HEARTLAND, INC.

FORM 10-QSB

TABLE OF CONTENTS



PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		3
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION		9
ITEM 3. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		20
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION		20
ITEM 1.- LEGAL PROCEEDINGS		20
ITEM 2. – CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS		21
ITEM 3.- DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES		21
ITEM 4.- SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS		21
ITEM 5 – OTHER INFORMATION		21
ITEM 6.- EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K		22
SIGNATURES		22

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

HEARTLAND, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

ASSETS

	June 30,2005		December 31,
	(Unaudited)		2004

Current Assets:
Cash	$	650,357	$	578,354
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $414,746 and $684,829 respectively		3,830,334		3,450,970
Costs in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts		508,148		187,621
Inventories		6,363,223		4,932,629
Prepaid expenses and other		130,511		117,255

Total Current Assets		11,482,573		9,266,829

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net of accumulated depreciation of $834,976 and $723,761, respectively		1,788,029		1,876,685

Other Assets:
Advances to related party		251,122		281,122
Goodwill		1,748,637		1,748,637
Other		64,763		13,787

Total Other Assets		2,064,522		2,043,546

Total Assets	$	15,335,124	$	13,187,060

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

HEARTLAND, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

	June 30, 2005			December 31,
	(Unaudited)			2004

Current Liabilities:
Bank lines of credit	$	910,988		$	810,989
Note payable – land purchase		2,616,681			1,965,698
Short-term loan from individual		100,000			-
Convertible promissory notes		1,680,700			1,026,550
Current portion of long-term notes payable		44,175			45,133
Current portion of capitalized lease obligation		115,423			115,423
Acquisition notes payable to related parties		3,250,000			3,300,000
Due to related parties		542,117			670,907
Accounts payable		3,629,262			2,864,312
Payroll taxes payable		630,413			693,630
Other accrued liabilities		1,095,809			484,955
Billings in excess of costs on uncompleted contracts		225,483			153,379
Customer deposits		96,700			21,068
Deferred income taxes		371,877			371,877
Total Current Liabilities		15,309,628			12,523,921

Long-term Debt:
Notes Payable, less current portion		519,777			541,313
Capitalized lease obligation, less current portion		212,100			269,100
Notes payable – individual		150,000			150,000
		881,877			960,413

Deferred income taxes		36,126			36,126

Shareholders’ Equity (Deficiency):
Preferred stock $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding Common stock $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 20,976,071 and 18,244,801 issued and outstanding, respectively		20,976			18,244
Additional paid-in-capital		7,089,514			5,656,911
Accumulated deficit		(8,002,997	)		(6,008,555	)
Total Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)		(892,507	)		(333,400	)

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)	$	15,335,124		$	13,187,060

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

HEARTLAND, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

		Three Months Ended June 30					Six Months Ended June 30
		2005		2004			2005			2004

Net Revenues	$	9,400,719		$	1,673,258		$	17,639,141		$	3,493,249

Costs and Expenses:
Cost of goods sold		8,050,021			1,511,555			15,317,090			2,875,016
General and administrative expenses		1,526,150			127,658			2,826,965			347,957
Stock based compensation		485,335			6,188			1,175,335			6,188
Depreciation and amortization		58,024			2,749			112,015			30,667
Total Costs and Expenses		10,119,530			1,648,150			19,431,405			3,259,828

Income (Loss) from Operations		(718,811	)		25,108			(1,792,264	)		233,421

Other Income (Expense):
Rental income		39,051			38,569			78,102			97,781
Other income		4,791			439			5,988			439
Interest expense		(178,901	)		(12,323	)		(283,283	)		(21,332	)
Loss on disposal of equipment		-			(2,489	)		-			(2,489	)
Total Other Income (Expense)		(135,059	)		24,196			(199,193	)		74,399

Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes		(853,870	)		49,304			(1,991,457	)		307,820

Provision for Income Taxes		-			-			1,225			-

Net Income (Loss)	$	(853,870	)	$	49,304		$	(1,992,682	)	$	307,820

Earnings (Loss) per Share:
Basic	$	(0.04	)	$	-		$	(0.10	)	$	0.02
Diluted	$	(0.04	)	$	-		$	(0.10	)	$	0.02

Weighted Average Common and Common Equivalent Shares Outstanding		19,998,334			13,572,710			20,479,850			13,505,322

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

HEARTLAND, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004

Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Net Cash Flows Used in Operating Activities:
Net income (Loss)	$	(1,992,682	)	$	307,820
Depreciation and amortization		112,015			30,667
Loss on disposal of equipment		-			2,489
Stock-based compensation		1,175,335			6,188
Changes in working capital:
Accounts receivable, trade, net		(379,364	)		178,456
Costs in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts		(320,527	)		-
Inventories		(1,430,594	)		(182,614	)
Prepaid expenses other		(13,256	)		-
Other assets		(51,776	)		-
Accounts payable		764,950			(233,204	)
Payroll taxes payable		(63,217	)		(71,251	)
Other accrued liabilities		610,854			(19,993	)
Billings in excess of costs on uncompleted contracts		72,104			(156,507	)
Customer deposits		75,632			-

Net Cash Flow Used in Operating Activities		(1,440,526	)		(137,949	)

Investing Activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(22,559	)		(3,000	)
Repayment of advances to related parties		30,000			-

Net Cash Flows Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities		7,441			(3,000	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

HEARTLAND, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004

Financing Activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	$	200,000		$	197,500
Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes		714,150			-
Borrowing on line of credit		99,999			-
Borrowing for land purchases		650,983			-
Short-term loan from individual		100,000			-
Payments on acquisition notes payable to related parties		(50,000	)		-
Advances received from related parties		73,000			-
Payments on obligations to related parties		(201,790	)		-
Borrowing on notes payable		-			19,118
Payment on notes payable		(22,494	)		(34,359	)
Payments on capital lease obligation		(57,000	)		-
Payment of dividends		(1,760	)		-

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		1,505,088			182,259

Increase in Cash		72,003			41,310

Cash, beginning of period		578,354			4,923

Cash, end of period	$	650,357		$	46,233

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

HEARTLAND, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE A – CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In the opinion of the Company, The accompanying Unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) which are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures, normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, have been condensed and/or omitted. The results of operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2005. The condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements included in its annual Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004.

NOTE B - CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES PAYABLE

During the quarter ended June 30, 2005 the Company entered into additional promissory notes aggregating $146,900. The notes bear interest at the rate of 10% per year and are due and payable one year from the date executed at which time the notes, at the option of the note holder, can be converted into common stock at $1.00 per share.

NOTE C - STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY

The Company issued 300,000 of its common stock to the former President in connection with a settlement Agreement. The shares were valued at $0.50 per share. Accordingly stock based compensation in the amount of $150,000 has been recoded in the financial statements.

The Company issued 60,000 of its common stock in connection with the conversion of Convertible Promissory Notes.

The Company issued 200,000 of its common stock for cash. The shares were sold at $1.00 per share.

The Company during the second quarter 2005, issued 671,270 shares of its common stock for consulting services. The shares were valued at $0.50 per share or $335,335 and accordingly this amount was recorded as stock based compensation.

NOTE D – GOING CONCERN

As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has current liabilities of $3,827,055 in excess of current assets resulting in negative working capital and an accumulated deficit of $8,002,987. Management is presently seeking to raise permanent equity capital in the capital markets or some form of long-term debt instrument to eliminate the negative working capital. Additionally, the Company is seeking to acquire additional profitable companies. Failure to raise equity or secure some other form of long-term debt arrangement will cause the Company to further increase its negative working capital deficit. However, there are no assurances, that the Company will succeed in the obtaining of equity financing or some form of long-term debt instrument.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OERATION.

Cautionary Statement Pursuant to Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995:

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 contains "forward-looking" statements within the meaning of the Federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements include, among others, statements concerning the Company's expectations regarding sales trends, gross and net operating margin trends, political and economic matters, the availability of equity capital to fund the Company's capital requirements, and other statements of expectations, beliefs, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends, and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. The forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those results expressed in or implied by the statements contained herein.

The interim financial statements have been prepared by Heartland, Inc. and in the opinion of management, reflect all material adjustments which are necessary to a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented, including normal recurring adjustments. Certain information and footnote disclosures made in the most recent annual financial statements included in the Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, have been condensed or omitted for the interim statements. It is the Company's opinion that, when the interim statements are read in conjunction with the December 31, 2004 financial statements, the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full fiscal year.

(A)

THE COMPANY

The Company was incorporated in the State of Maryland on April 6, 1999 as Origin Investment Group, Inc. ("Origin"). On December 27, 2001, the Company went through a reverse merger with International Wireless, Inc. Thereafter on January 2, 2002, the Company changed its name from Origin to International Wireless, Inc. On November 15, 2003, the Company went through a reverse merger with PMI Wireless, Inc. Thereafter in May 2004, the Company changed its name from International Wireless, Inc. to our current name, Heartland Inc.

The Company was originally formed as a non-diversified closed-end management investment company, as those terms are used in the Investment Company Act of 1940 ("1940 Act"). The Company at that time elected to be regulated as a business development company under the 1940 Act. In December 7, 2001 the Company’s shareholders voted on withdrawing the Company from being regulated as a business development company and thereby no longer be subject to the 1940 Act.

Unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms “Company,” “Corporate”, “Heartland,” and “we” refer to Heartland, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Our executive offices are located at 3300 Fernbrook Lane Plymouth, MN 55447, telephone number (763) 557-2900. Our Internet address is www.heartlandholdingsinc.com for the corporate information. Additionally, the following divisions of the company currently maintain Internet addresses: 1)Evans Columbus, www.evanscolumbusllc.com, 2)Monarch Homes, www.monarchhomesmn.com, 3) Karkela Construction, www.karkela.com and 4) Mound Technologies, www.moundtechnologies.com. The information contained on our web site(s) or connected to our website is not incorporated by reference into our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB and should not be considered part of this report.

We classify our operations into four reportable segments: steel fabrication, construction and property management, manufacturing, and agriculture (currently idle but available for future use). A fifth segment called “other” consists of corporate functions. Sales of our segments accounted for the following approximate percentages of our consolidated sales for fiscal years 2004: Steel Fabrication, 14.78 percent; Construction and Property Management, 69.38 percent; Manufacturing 15.84 percent, Agriculture 0 percent and Other, 0 percent.

We emphasize quality and innovation in our services, products, manufacturing, and marketing. We strive to provide well-built, dependable products supported by our service network. We have committed funding for engineering and research in order to improve existing products and develop new products. Through these efforts, we seek to be responsive to trends that may affect our target markets now and in the future.

(B)

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT

The Company's original investment strategy when it was regulated as a business development company under the 1940 Act was to invest in a diverse portfolio of private companies that could be used to build an Internet infrastructure by offering hardware, software and/or services which enhance the use of the Internet. Prior to it's reverse merger with International Wireless, the Company identified two eligible portfolio companies with which they entered into agreements to acquire interests within such companies and to further invest capital in these companies to further develop their business. However, on each occasion and prior to each closing, the Company was either unable to raise sufficient capital to consummate the transaction or discovered information which modified its understanding of the eligible portfolio company's financial status to such an extent where it was unadvisable for it to continue and consummate the transaction. During the 2002 fiscal year, the Company entered into a definitive share exchange agreement and investment agreement with Vivocom, Inc., a San Jose, California based software company that had developed a proprietary all media switching system which enables all forms of data to be sent over a single IP channel. The Company intended on investing a minimum of three million two hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($3,250,000) within Vivocom over several months. Due to the Company's inability to raise this money, the share exchange never took place and the agreement terminated.

On December 7, 2001, the Company held a special meeting of its shareholders in accordance with a filed Form DEF 14A with the Securities and Exchange Commission whereby the shareholders voted on withdrawing the Company from being regulated as a business development company and thereby no longer be subject to the Investment Company Act of 1940 and to effect a one-for-nine reverse split of its total issued and outstanding common stock. On December 14, 2001 the Company filed a Form N-54C with the Securities and Exchange Commission formally notifying its withdrawal from being regulated as a business development company. The purpose of the withdrawal of the Company from being regulated as a business development company and the one-for-nine reverse split of its total issued and outstanding common stock was to allow the Company to merge with a potential business in the future. By withdrawing from its status as a business development company, the Company chose to be treated as a publicly traded "C" corporation.

On December 27, 2001, the Company went through a reverse merger whereby it acquired all the outstanding shares of International Wireless. Under the said reverse merger, the former Shareholders of International Wireless ended up owning an 88.61% interest in the Company. Thereafter on January 2, 2002, the Company changed its name from Origin to International Wireless, Inc.

From December 27, 2001 through June 2003, the Company attempted to develop its bar code technology and bring it to market. To that extent, the Company moved its operations to Woburn, Massachusetts, hired numerous computer programmers, developers and sales people in addition to support staff. Due to the Company's inability to raise sufficient capital, the Company was unable to pay current operating expenses and by June, 2003 shut down its operations entirely.

On August 29, 2003, a change in control of the Company occurred in conjunction with naming Attorney Jerry Gruenbaum of First Union Venture Group, LLC as attorney of record for the purpose of overseeing the proper disposition of the Company and its remaining assets and liabilities by any means appropriate, including settling any and all liabilities to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts' Attorney General's office for unpaid wages.

In conjunction with naming Attorney Jerry Gruenbaum of First Union Venture Group, LLC as attorney of record for the purpose of overseeing the proper disposition of the Company and its remaining assets and liabilities, the Company issued First Union Venture Group, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company, Thirty Million (30,000,000) newly issued common shares as consideration for their services. In addition, the Company canceled any and all outstanding options, warrants, and/or debentures not exercised to date. The Company further nullified

any and all salaries, bonuses, and benefits including severance pay and accrued salaries to Stanley A. Young and Michael Dewar.

On November 12, 2003, the Company approved the spin-off of the two subsidiaries of the Company and any and all remaining assets of the Company, including any intellectual property, to enable the Company to pursue a suitable merger candidate. In addition, the Company approved a 30 to 1 reverse split of all existing outstanding common shares of the Company. Following the 30 to 1 reverse split, the Company had 1,857,137 shares of common stock outstanding.

On November 15, 2003, a change in control of the Company occurred when the Company went through a reverse merger with PMI Wireless, Inc., a Delaware corporation with corporate headquarters located in Cordova, Tennessee. The acquisition, took place on December 1, 2003 for the aggregate consideration of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) which was paid to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service for the Company's prior obligations, plus assumption of the Company's existing debts, for 9,938,466 newly issued common shares of the Company. Under the said reverse merger, the former Shareholders of PMI Wireless ended up owning an 84.26% interest in the Company.

On December 10, 2003, the Company entered into an Acquisition Agreement to acquire one hundred percent (100%) of Mound Technologies, Inc. ("Mound"), a Nevada corporation with its corporate headquarters located in Springboro, Ohio. The acquisition was a stock for stock exchange in which the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding common stock of Mound in exchange for 1,256,000 newly issued shares of its common stock. As a result of this transaction, Mound became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

In May 2004, the Company changed its name from International Wireless, Inc. to our current name, Heartland, Inc and Subsidiaries.

On December 27, 2004, the Company entered into an Acquisition Agreement to acquire one hundred percent (100%) of Monarch Homes, Inc. ("Monarch"), a Minnesota corporation with its corporate headquarters located in Ramsey, MN for five million dollars ($5,000,000). The acquisition price was made up of: 1) $100,000 at closing, 2) a promissory note of $1,900,000 payable on or before February 15, 2005 which, if not paid by that date, interest shall be due from then to actual payment at 8%, simple interest, compounded annually and 3) six hundred sixty-seven thousand (667,000) restricted newly issued shares of the Company’s common stock provided at closing. In the event the common stock of the Company is not trading at a minimum of $5.00 as of December 27, 2005, the Company is required to compensate the original Monarch shareholders for the difference in additional stock. As a result of this transaction, Monarch became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

On December 30, 2004, the Company entered into an Acquisition Agreement to acquire one hundred percent (100%) of Evans Columbus, LLC ("Evans"), an Ohio limited liability company with its headquarters located in Blacklick, OH for three million five thousand dollars ($3,005,000). The acquisition price was made up of: 1) $5,000 at closing, and 2) six hundred thousand (600,000) restricted newly issued shares of the Company’s common stock provided at closing. In the event the common stock of the Company is not trading at a minimum of $5.00 as of December 30, 2005, the Company is required to compensate the original Evans shareholders for the difference in additional stock. As a result of this transaction, Evans became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

On December 31, 2004, the Company entered into an Acquisition Agreement to acquire one hundred percent (100%) of Karkela Construction, Inc. ("Karkela"), a Minnesota corporation with its corporate headquarters located in St. Louis Park, MN for three million dollars ($3,000,000). The acquisition price was made up of: 1) $100,000 at closing, 2) a short term promissory note payable of $50,000 on or before January 31, 2005, 3) a promissory note of $1,305,000 payable on or before March 31, 2005 which, if not paid by that date, interest is due from December 31, 2004 to actual payment at 8%, simple interest, compounded annually and 4) five hundred thousand (500,000) restricted newly issued shares of the Company’s common stock provided at closing. In the event the common stock of the Company is not trading at a minimum of $4.00 as of December 31, 2005, the Company is required to compensate the original Karkela shareholders for the difference in additional stock. As a result of this transaction, Karkela became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005 COMPARED TO THE THREE MONTHS AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2004.

We are an operating conglomerate with operations in steel fabrication, manufacturing, construction and property management. Revenues for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005 were $9,400,719 and $17,639,141, respectively, compared to $1,673,258 and $3,493,249 for the same periods in 2004. Total operating expenses were $10,119,530 and $19,431,405 for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, compared to $1,648,150 and $3,259,828 for the same periods in 2004. These increases in revenues and operating expenses were primarily due to the acquisition in December 2004 of Monarch Homes, Inc., Evans Columbus, LLC and Karkela Construction, Inc. Additionally, stock-based compensation relating to the granting of restricted shares to management and the issuance of restricted shares in payment of consulting fees contributed to the increased operating expenses.

Interest expense for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005 was $178,901 and $283,283, respectively, compared to $12,323 and $21,332 for the same periods in 2004. The increases were primarily due to 1) long-term debt and capital leases of the three subsidiaries acquired in December 2004 mentioned above, 2) increased borrowings by Monarch Homes for the acquisition of additional land for development, and 3) the sale of additional convertible promissory notes by the parent company.

As a result, Net Income (Loss) was ($853,870) and ($1,992,682) for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, compared to $49,304 and $307,820 for the same periods in 2004.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Net cash used in operating activities was ($1,440,526) for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This was primarily related to operating losses and additional inventories of land and work-in-process in the construction businesses, offset in part by additional trade financing. The deficit was financed by sales of restricted shares totaling $200,000 and net borrowings of $1,303,328 during the six months ended June 30, 2005.

Total short-term and long-term debt at June 30, 2005 was $10,141,961 and total shareholders’ equity (deficiency) was ($892,507).

Our businesses are seasonally working capital intensive and require funding for purchases of raw materials used in production, replacement parts inventory, capital expenditures, expansion and upgrading of existing facilities, as well as for financing receivables from customers. Additionally, our auditors, in their opinion on our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004 issued a “going concern” qualification to their report dated March 20, 2005. We believe that cash generated from operations, together with our bank credit lines, and cash on hand, will provide us with a majority of our liquidity to meet our operating requirements. We believe that the combination of funds available through future anticipated financing arrangements, as discussed below, coupled with forecasted cash flows, will be sufficient to provide the necessary capital resources for our anticipated working capital, capital expenditures, and debt repayments for at least the next twelve months.

We are seeking to raise up to $20 million of additional capital from private investors and institutional money managers in the next few months, but there can be no assurance that we will be successful in doing so. If we are not successful in raising any of this additional capital, our current cash resources may not sufficient to fund our current operations.

We may experience problems, delays, expenses, and difficulties sometimes encountered by an enterprise in our stage of development, many of which are beyond our control. For potential acquisitions, these include, but are not limited to, unanticipated problems relating to the identifying partner(s), obtaining financing, culminating the identified partner due to a number of possibilities (prices, dates, terms, etc). Due to limited experience in operating the combined entities for the Company, we may experience production and marketing problems, incur additional costs and expenses that may exceed current estimates, and competition.

- Material off-balance sheet activities, including the use of structured finance or special purpose entities;

- Trading activities in non-exchange traded contracts; or

- Transactions with persons or entities that benefit from their non-independent relationship with the Company.

Inflation

We are subject to the effects of inflation and changing prices. As previously mentioned, we experienced rising prices for steel and other commodities during fiscal 2004 and for the first six months of 2005 that had a negative impact on our gross margins and net earnings. In the remainder of fiscal 2005, we expect average prices of steel and other commodities to be higher than the average prices paid in fiscal 2004 and for the first six months of 2005. We will attempt to mitigate the impact of these anticipated increases in steel and other commodity prices and other inflationary pressures by actively pursuing internal cost reduction efforts and introducing price increases.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

In preparing our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, we must make decisions that impact the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures. Such decisions include the selection of the appropriate accounting principles to be applied and the assumptions on which to base accounting estimates. In reaching such decisions, we apply judgments based on our understanding and analysis of the relevant circumstances, historical experience, and actuarial valuations. Actual amounts could differ from those estimated at the time the consolidated financial statements are prepared.

Our significant accounting policies are described in Note A to the consolidated financial statements. Some of those significant accounting policies require us to make difficult subjective or complex judgments or estimates. An accounting estimate is considered to be critical if it meets both of the following criteria: (i) the estimate requires assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate is made, and (ii) different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, would have a material impact on the presentation of our financial condition, changes in financial condition or results of operations.

Accounts Receivable Valuation. We value accounts receivable, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Each quarter, we estimate our ability to collect outstanding receivables that provides a basis for an allowance estimate for doubtful accounts. In doing so, we evaluate the age of our receivables, past collection history, current financial conditions of key customers, and economic conditions. Based on this evaluation, we establish a reserve for specific accounts receivable that we believe are uncollectible, as well as an estimate of uncollectible receivables not specifically known. A deterioration in the financial condition of any key customer or a significant slow down in the economy could have a material negative impact on our ability to collect a portion or all of the accounts and notes receivable.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on us.

BUSINESS

The Company's mission is to become a leading diversified company with business interests in well established service organizations and capital goods manufacturing companies focusing in the areas of 1) Steel Fabrication, 2) Construction and Property Management (residential and commercial), 3) Agriculture(currently idle), and 4) Manufacturing. The Company plans to successfully grow its’ revenue by acquiring companies with historically profitable results, strong balance sheets, high profit margins, and solid management teams in place. By providing access to financial markets, expanded marketing opportunities and operating expense efficiencies, the Company expects to become the facilitator for future growth and higher long-term profits. In the process, the Company expects to develop new synergies among the acquired companies, which should allow for greater cost effectiveness and efficiencies, and thus further enhancing each individual company's strengths. To date, the Company has completed acquisitions in steel fabrication, residential and commercial construction facilities, and heavy machinery industries.

The Company is headquartered in Plymouth, MN and currently trades on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol HTLJ.OB. Including the senior management team, Heartland currently employs 101 people.

Currently, the Company operates four major subsidiaries in the following segments:

1)	Mound Technologies, Inc. of Springboro, OH acquired in December 2003 (Steel Fabrication).
2)	Evans Columbus, LLC of Columbus, OH acquired in December of 2004 (Manufacturing).

3)	Monarch Homes, Inc. of Ramsey, MN, acquired in December of 2004 (Construction and Property Management).
4)	Karkela Construction, Inc. of St. Louis Park, MN, acquired in December of 2004 (Construction and Property Management).

These subsidiaries have an average operational history of more than 35 years, and each is characterized by a track record of consistent and stable growth.

Excluding corporate expenses, the complementary nature of the operations of the four segments offers the Company the opportunity to increase its top line revenue through cross selling opportunities and expanded marketing opportunities. Furthermore, the Company expects it will be able reduce overall expenses through cost savings associated with reductions in raw materials costs and corporate and administrative expenses.

Steel Fabrication

Mound Technologies, Inc. (“Mound”) was incorporated in the state of Nevada in November of 2002, with its corporate offices located in Springboro, Ohio. This business includes a Steel Fabrication (“Steel Fabrication”), and a Property Management Division (“Property Management”).

The Steel Fabrication Division and Property Management Division are both located in Springboro, Ohio. The Steel Fabrication Division is a full service structural and miscellaneous steel fabricator. It also manufactures steel stairs and railings, both industrial and architectural quality. The present capacity of the facility is approximately 6,000 tons per year of structural and miscellaneous steel. This division had been previously known as Mound Steel Corporation, which was started at the same location in 1964.

The Steel Fabrication Division is focused on the fabrication of metal products. This Division produces structural steel, miscellaneous metals, steel stairs, railings, bar joists, metal decks and the erection thereof. This Division produced gross sales of approximately $7.4 million in 2004. In the steel products segment, steel joists and joist girders, and steel deck are sold to general contractors and fabricators throughout the United States. Substantially all work is to order and no unsold inventories of finished products are maintained. All sales contracts are firm fixed-price contracts and are normally competitively bid against other suppliers. Cold finished steel and steel fasteners are manufactured in standard sizes and inventories are maintained.

This Division's customers are typically U.S. based companies that require large structural steel fabrication, with needs such as building additions, new non-residential construction, etc. Customers are typically located within a one-day drive from the Company's facilities. The Company is able to reach 70% of the U.S. population, yielding a significant potential customer base. Marketing of the Division’s products is done by advertising in industry directories, word-of-mouth from existing customers, and by the dedicated efforts of in-house sales staff monitoring business developments opportunities within the Company's region. Large clients typically work with the Company on a continual basis for all their fabricated metal needs.

Competition overall in the U.S. steel fabrication industry has been reduced by approximately 50% over the last few years due to economic conditions leading to the lack of sustained work. The number of regional competitors has gone down from ten (10) to three (3) over the past five years. Larger substantial work projects have declined dramatically with the downturn in the economy. Given the geographical operating territory of the Company, foreign competition is not a major factor. In addition to competition, steel pricing represents another significant challenge. The cost of steel, our highest input cost, has seen significant increases in recent years. The Company hopes to manage this challenge by stockpiling the most common steel component products and incorporating price increases in job pricing as deemed appropriate.

Competition and Other Factors

We are subject to a wide variety of federal, state, and international environmental laws, rules, and regulations. These laws, rules, and regulations may affect the way we conduct our operations, and failure to comply with these regulations could lead to fines and other penalties.

Competition within the steel industry, both in the United States and globally, is intense and expected to remain so. Mound competes with large U.S. competitors such as United States Steel Corporation, Nucor Corporation, AK Steel Holding Corporation, Ispat Inland Inc. and IPSCO Inc along with a number of local supplies. The steel market in the United States is also served by a number of non-U.S. sources and U.S. supply is subject to changes in worldwide demand and currency fluctuations, among other factors.

More than 35 U.S. companies in the steel industry have declared bankruptcy since 1997 and have either ceased production or more often continued to operate after being acquired or reorganized. In addition, many non-U.S. steel producers are owned and subsidized by their governments and their decisions with respect to production and sales may be influenced by political and economic policy considerations rather than by prevailing market conditions. The steel industry is highly cyclical in nature and subject to significant fluctuations in demand as a result of macroeconomic changes in global economies, including those resulting from currency volatility. The global steel industry is also generally characterized by overcapacity, which can result in downward pressure on steel prices and gross margins.

Mound competes with other flat-rolled steel producers (both integrated steel mills and mini-mills) and producers of plastics, aluminum, ceramics, carbon fiber, concrete, glass, plastic and wood that can be used in lieu of flat-rolled steels in manufactured products. Mini-mills generally offer a narrower range of products than integrated steel mills but can have some cost advantages as a result of their different production processes.

Price, quality, delivery and service are the primary competitive factors in all markets that Mound serves and vary in relative importance according to the product category and specific customer.

In some areas of our business, we are primarily an assembler, while in others we serve as a fully integrated manufacturer. We have strategically identified specific core manufacturing competencies for vertical integration and have chosen outside vendors to provide other products and services. We design component parts in cooperation with our vendors, contract with them for the development of tooling, and then enter into agreements with these vendors to purchase component parts manufactured using the tooling. Operations are also designed to be flexible enough to accommodate product design changes required to respond to market demand.

Raw Materials

Mound’s business depends on continued access to reliable supplies of various raw materials. Mound believes there will be adequate sources of its principal raw materials to meet its near term needs, although probably at higher prices than in the past.

Unfair Trade Practices and Trade Remedies

Under international agreement and U.S. law, remedies are available to domestic industries where imports are “dumped” or “subsidized” and such imports cause material injury to a domestic industry. Dumping involves selling for export a product at a price lower than the same or similar product is sold in the home market of the exporter or where the export prices are lower than a value that typically must be at or above the full cost of production. Subsidies from governments (including, among other things, grants and loans at artificially low interest rates) under certain circumstances are similarly actionable. The remedy available is an antidumping duty order or suspension agreement where injurious dumping is found and a countervailing duty order or suspension agreement where injurious subsidization is found. When dumping or subsidies continue after the issuance of an order, a duty equal to the amount of dumping or subsidization is imposed on the importer of the product. Such orders and suspension agreements do not prevent the importation of product, but rather require either that the product be priced at an undumped level or without the benefit of subsidies or that the importer pay the difference between such undumped or unsubsidized price and the actual price to the U.S. government as a duty.

Section 201 Tariffs

On March 20, 2002, in response to an investigation initiated by the office of the President of the United States under Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974, the President of the United States imposed a remedy to address the serious injury to the domestic steel industry that was found. The remedy was an additional tariff on specific products up to 30% (as low as 9%) in the first year and subject to reductions each year. The remedy provided was potentially for three years and a day, subject to an interim review after 18 months as to continued need. On December 4, 2003 by Proclamation 7741, the President of the United States terminated the import relief provided under this law pursuant to Section 204(b) (1) (A) of the Trade Act of 1974 on the basis that “the effectiveness of the action taken under Section 203 has been impaired by changed economic circumstances” based upon a report from the U.S. International Trade Commission and the advice from the Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of Labor. Thus, no relief under this law was provided to domestic producers during 2004.

Environmental Matters

Mounds operations are subject to a broad range of laws and regulations relating to the protection of human health and the environment. Mound expects to expend in the future, substantial amounts to achieve or maintain ongoing compliance with U.S. federal, state, and local laws and regulations, including the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Clean Air Act, and the Clean Water Act. These environmental expenditures are not projected to have a material adverse effect on Mound’s financial position or on Mound’s competitive position with respect to other similarly situated U.S. steelmakers subject to the same environmental requirements.

Construction and Property Management

a)	Monarch Homes, Inc.

Monarch Homes, Inc., (“Monarch”) located in Ramsey, MN, was acquired in December 2004, is a builder of custom residential homes in the state of Minnesota. Our domestic homebuilding operations currently involve the purchase and development of land or lots and the construction and sale of single-family homes, town homes and low-rise condominiums. Monarch was founded in 1995 and had annual sales of approximately $23 million during 2004. Over the course of the past ten years, Monarch has become one of the region's premier builders of quality homes in planned communities in the northern and northwestern suburbs of Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota. In fiscal 2004, Monarch sold 87 homes, including first-time, move-up and, in some markets, custom homes, ranging in price from approximately $160,000 to $600,000. The average sales price in fiscal 2004 was approximately $275,000.

Our practice has been to acquire land, build homes on the land and sell the homes within 24 to 36 months from the date of land acquisition. Generally, this involves acquiring land that is properly zoned and is either ready for development or, to some degree, already developed. We control a substantial amount of our land, including lots and land to be developed into lots, through option agreements that we can exercise over specified time periods or, in certain cases, as the land or lots are needed. At December 31, 2004, Monarch owned approximately 20 lots and has two exclusive agreements with developers. Our growth strategy for Monarch has been focused primarily on organic growth opportunities through land acquisition and development in existing business units and markets.

It is the intent of the Company to expand this business unit into the construction of super energy efficient homes using new EPS technology that allows for custom construction, with greatly increased “R” ratings. An agreement is in process to have exclusive rights to this type of construction product in the area of Central America. The company believes that this will reduce the seasonality associated with the construction industry.

b)	Karkela Construction, Inc.

Karkela Construction, Inc. (“Karkela”) was acquired in December 2004 and located in St. Louis Park, MN. Karkela was acquired in December 2004 and is a general contractor in the greater St. Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota area specializing in commercial, industrial, hospitality or multi-family space. More specifically, Karkela is a designer and builder of custom office buildings for medical, financial and other service type businesses. Karkela was originally founded in 1983 and incorporated in 1990. During fiscal year 2004 Karkela had revenues of approximately $11.8 million. It is the intent of Heartland to expand that territory to include those geographies where the company can benefit from its reputation.

c)	Mound Property Management Division

The Property Management Division is both located in Springboro, Ohio. The Mound Property Management Division is focused on the ownership and management of industrial property, in Ohio. The Property Management Division presently owns two (2) properties and manages three (3) other properties which are all located in Ohio. The two owned properties include 37,000 square feet of light and heavy manufacturing buildings on approximately 6 acres. The Company manages 33 acres of industrial property in Ohio, which is not owned.

Competition and Other Factors

The conventional construction industry is essentially a “local” business and is highly competitive. The top 10 builders, in the United States, in calendar year 2003 accounted for approximately 15.1% of the total for-sale attached and detached housing permits in the United States. Monarch and Karkela compete in each market with numerous other homebuilders and general construction companies, including national, regional and local builders. The industries top six competitors based on revenues for their most recent fiscal year-end are as follows: Beazer Homes USA, Inc., D. R. Horton, Inc., KB Homes, Lennar Corporation, Pulte Homes, Inc. and The Ryland Group, Inc. The main competitive factors affecting Monarch and Karkela operations are location, price, availability of mortgage financing for customers, construction costs, design and quality of homes, customer service, marketing expertise, availability of land, price of land and reputation. We believe that Monarch and Karkela competes effectively by building high quality units, maintaining geographic diversity, responding to the specific demands of each market and managing the operations at a local level.

The construction industry is affected by changes in national and local economic conditions, job growth, long-term and short-term interest rates, consumer confidence, governmental policies, zoning restrictions and, to a lesser extent, changes in property taxes, energy costs, federal income tax laws, federal mortgage financing programs and various demographic factors. The political and economic environments affect both the demand for construction and the subsequent cost of financing. Unexpected climatic conditions, such as unusually heavy or prolonged rain or snow, may affect operations in certain areas.

The construction industry is subject to extensive regulations. The Company and its subcontractors must comply with various federal, state and local laws and regulations, including worker health and safety, zoning, building standards, erosion and storm water pollution control, advertising, consumer credit rules and regulations, and the extensive and changing federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances governing the protection of the environment, including the protection of endangered species. The Company is also subject to other rules and regulations in connection with its manufacturing and sales activities, including requirements as to incorporate building materials and building designs. All of these regulatory requirements are applicable to all construction companies, and, to date, compliance with these requirements has not had a material impact on the operation. We believe that the Company is in material compliance with these requirements.

We purchase materials, services and land from numerous sources (primarily local vendors), and believe that we can deal effectively with the challenges we may experience relating to the supply or availability of materials, services and land.

The results of operations of our Property Management segment may be adversely affected by increases in interest rates. Any significant increase in mortgage interest rates above currently prevailing low levels could affect the ability or willingness of prospective buyers to finance their purchases. Although we expect that we would be able to make adjustments in our operations to mitigate the effects of any increase in interest rates, there can be no assurances that these efforts would be successful.

This Property Management segment faces competition from real estate investment trusts (REIT's), which are already among the largest commercial property owners in the United States. With over 300 public and private REIT's in the United States, they have slowly been growing their holdings through acquisitions. Most REIT's, however, do not specialize in industrial and office properties.

Manufacturing

Evans Columbus, LLC, (“Evans”) acquired in December 2004, manufactures 55-gallon steel drums at a production rate of approximately 3,000 drums per day. Evans, which was founded in 1955, generated revenues of approximately $8 million in 2004. Manufacturing is carried out in a fully equipped 70,000 square foot facility located in Columbus, Ohio. This facility is able to do various coated products as well as standard painted drums. Prior to its acquisition by Heartland, Evans Columbus was a family owned and operated business.

In order to utilize manufacturing facilities and technology more effectively, we pursue continuous improvements in manufacturing processes. We have some flexible assembly lines to deliver products when customers require them. Additionally, considerable effort is spent to reduce manufacturing costs through process improvement, product and platform design, application of advanced technology, enhanced environmental management systems, and better supply-chain management.

Our production levels and inventory management goals are based on estimates of demand for our products, taking into account production capacity, timing of shipments, and field inventory levels. We also periodically shut down production to allow for maintenance, rearrangement, and capital equipment installation at the manufacturing facilities.

Incorporated into our Quality Policy, Evans maintains a regular preventative maintenance and calibration schedule. Our dedicated maintenance crew is "on-the-job" at all times. During manufacturing shifts, we are testing to make sure drums are manufactured to meet customer specification and governmental regulations. Regular preventative maintenance protects the plant equipment and assures reliability and continuity of supply.

Competition and Other Factors

The steel container industry is the third-largest steel user, next to the automobile industry and the appliance industry. Steel drum-makers, who manufacture 55-gallon drums that hold products ranging from chocolate for ice cream bars to coatings for jelly beans, make up about 40 percent of the steel container industry. The steel drum industry mainly uses cold-rolled steel.

There are approximately 14 manufacturers of 55 gallon steel drums nationwide. The three major competitors of the company are North Coast Container (Cleveland, Ohio), Berenfield Containters (Mason, OH), and Grief Bros Corporation (Delaware, Ohio) which are all larger than Evans. The region where Evans is located is one of the more heavily concentrated areas for 55 gallon drum manufactures and users.

Attention to environmental compliance is practiced throughout the plant. Working in concert with the Ohio and Federal EPA, we continue to incorporate safe manufacturing processes. Rigorous testing throughout the plant ensures safety for our employees, neighbors and the environment.

Evans is subject to the risks associated with the steel industry, in particular to the cost of raw materials, energy and labor supply all of which are managed effectively. The company is reliant upon several distributors through out the Ohio Valley region. Evans sells it products to customers based upon superior quality and service and not specifically on price which leads to repeat business and less impact on economical affects (i.e. interest rates).

Other

The Company's mission is to become a leading diversified company with business interests in well established service organizations and capital goods manufacturing companies.

Competition and Other Factors

In addition to the risks identified above the Company also faces risks of its own. The Company is reliant upon identifying, contracting and financing each of acquisition it identifies. Since the Company, is in its early stages, it may not be able to obtain the necessary funding to continue its growth plan. Additionally, the potential synergies identified with each of the acquisitions may not materialize to the extend, if at all, as initially identified.

We will need to secure a minimum of $5,000,000 to satisfy such requirements for the next 12 months, which funds will be used for debt payment, facilities acquisition, lease obligations and personnel costs including salaries and benefits. We are pursing many financing options which can be any combination of debt or securities. We hope to be able to raise funds from an offering of our stock. However, we may not raise any funds from an offering. We have no source of funding identified at this time and our failure to raise funds in the future will impair and delay our ability to implement our business plan further.

Collectively, our officers and directors on a fully diluted basis beneficially own voting rights to 6,750,100 or 31.57% of our outstanding voting stock as of August 22, 2005. As such, our officers and directors have a significant voice in the control the outcome of all matters submitted to a vote by the holders of our voting stock, including the election of our directors, amendments to our certificate of incorporation and approval of significant corporate transactions. Additionally, our officers and directors could delay, deter or prevent a change in our control that might be beneficial to our other stockholders.

By providing access to financial markets, expanded marketing opportunities and operating expense efficiencies, the Company expects to become the facilitator for future growth and higher long-term profits of the businesses we acquire. In the process, the Company expects to develop new synergies among the acquired companies, which should allow for greater cost effectiveness and efficiencies, and thus further enhancing each individual company's strengths.

Employees

As of June 30, 2005, we employed 101 employees. From time to time, we also retain consultants, independent contractors, and temporary and part-time workers.

The Company believes its relationship with its current employees is good. Our employees are not represented by a labor union. However, the Company is in dispute with former employees as to back salaries and severance pay as disclosed in the footnotes below. The Company's success is dependent, in part, upon our ability to attract and retain qualified management technical personnel and subcontractors. Competition for these personnel is intense, and the Company will be adversely affected if it is unable to attract key employees. The Company presently does not have a stock option plan for key employees and consultants.

Customers

Overall, management believes that long-term we are not dependent on a single customer for any of the segments results. While the loss of any substantial customer could have a material short-term impact on a segment, we believe that our diverse distribution channels and customer base should reduce the long-term impact of any such loss.

Available Information

We are a reporting company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and file reports, proxy statements, and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Copies of these reports, proxy statements, and other information can be inspected and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Because we make filings to the SEC electronically, you may also access this information from the SEC’s home page on the Internet at http://www.sec.gov.

The information contained on our web site(s) or connected to our web site is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K and should not be considered part of this report. We have attached the required certifications under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 regarding the quality of our public disclosures as Exhibits 31(a) and 31(b) to this report.

ITEM 3. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

The Company’s management evaluated, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the normal course of our business, we and/or our subsidiaries are named as defendants in suits filed in various state and federal courts. We believe that none of the litigation matters in which we, or any of our subsidiaries, are involved would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or operations.

Mound Technologies, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, leases its manufacturing facility from the Receivership of Mound Properties, LP in Springboro, Ohio for a month to month term which began January 2005 at a monthly rent of $16,250. Each party has the right to terminate this lease with 30 days notice. Under the terms of the lease, the Company is responsible for utilities, personal property taxes, repairs and maintenance. The property is in the process of being sold and refinanced and a new lease will be arranged with the Company.

Other than the matters above, there is no other past, pending or, to the Company's knowledge, threatened litigation or administrative action which has or is expected by the Company's management to have a material effect upon our Company's business, financial condition or operations, including any litigation or action involving our Company's officers, directors, or other key personnel.

ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

On April 12, 2005 the company issued 300,000 shares to Jeffrey Brandeis, its former president, as a complete settlement of an employment contract dispute.

On April 29, 2005 the company issued 7,500 shares to Gerald Aaron for consulting fees.

On April 29, 2005 the company issued 200,000 shares to Ross Haugen for consulting fees.

On April 29, 2005 the company sold 150,000 shares to an investor in a private placement.

On April 29, 2005 the company sold 25,000 shares to an investor in a private placement.

On April 29, 2005 the company issued 100,000 shares to International Monetary Resources for consulting fees.

On May 25, 2005 the company issued 15,000 shares to Smallcapinvoice.com for consulting fees.

On May 27, 2005 the company issued 216,670 shares to John E. Gracik for consulting fees.

On May 27, 2005 the company issued 9,600 shares to Steven Gracik for consulting fees.

On May 27, 2005 the company issued 15,000 shares to Nicholas T. Pappas for consulting fees.

On May 27, 2005 the company issued 20,000 shares to David Yeomans for consulting fees.

On May 31, 2005 the company issued 60,000 shares to investors for conversion of promissory notes.

On June 6, 2005 the company issued 60,000 shares to First Equity Group, Inc. for consulting fees.

On June 14, 2005 the company sold 25,000 shares to an investor in a private placement.

On June 30, 2005 the company issued 27,500 shares to John E. Gracik for consulting fees.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

The Company is obligated under the terms of a lease dated February 25, 2005 with the Receivership of Mound Properties, LP in Springboro, Ohio owned by a related party on behalf of Mound for a month to month term beginning January 2005 at a monthly rent of $16,250. Each party has the right to terminate this lease with 30 days notice. Under the terms of the lease, the Company is responsible for utilities, personal property taxes, repairs and maintenance.

The Company is also obligated under the terms of a five year lease terminating December 31, 2009 in Plymouth, Minnesota for annual rents of $26,624, $27,648, $28,160 and $28,672 respectively. Under the terms of the lease the Company is responsible for a pro rata share of real estate taxes and operating expenses as additional rental.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)

Exhibits:

Exhibit 31.1	Certification of Trent Sommerville, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2	Certification of Roland Fink, Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit 32.1	Certification of Trent Sommerville, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2	Certification of Roland Fink, Chief Financial Officer

(b)	Reports on Form 8-K:

Three Months Ended June 30, 2005

The Company filed a Form 8-K/A on June 29, 2005 relating to a Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2005 which relate to events taken place on December 30, 2004 for the acquisition by the Company of Evans Columbus LLC.

The Company filed a Form 8-K/A on June 30, 2005 relating to a Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2005 which relate to events taken place on December 27, 2004 for the acquisition by the Company of Monarch Homes, Inc.

The Company filed a Form 8-K/A on June 30, 2005 relating to a Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2005 which relate to events taken place on December 31, 2004 for the acquisition by the Company of Karkela Construction, Inc.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

HEARTLAND, INC.

(Registrant)

Date: August 22, 2005

By: /s/ TRENT SOMMERVILLE

Trent Sommerville

Chief Executive Officer and

Chairman of the Board

(Duly Authorized Officer)

Date: August 22, 2005

By: /s/ ROLAND FINK, CPA

Roland Fink, CPA

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial

and Accounting Officer)