shoecarnival_def14a.htm
SCHEDULE 14A
INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934
(Amendment No. ___)
Filed by the Registrant |
[
X ] |
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant |
[ ] |
Check the appropriate
box: |
[
] |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
[
] |
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2)) |
[ X
] |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
[
] |
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
[
] |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to
§240.14a-12 |
SHOE CARNIVAL,
INC. |
(Name of
Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
|
|
(Name of
Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the
Registrant) |
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the
appropriate box): |
|
|
|
[
X ] |
|
No fee required. |
[ ] |
|
Fee computed on table below per
Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1) |
|
Title of each class of securities
to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to
which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying
value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set
forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of
transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ ] |
|
Fee paid previously with
preliminary materials. |
[ ] |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is
offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing
for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous
filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the
date of its filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
1) |
|
Amount Previously
Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration
Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2010
Dear Shareholder:
On behalf of the
Board and management, we wish to extend an invitation to you to attend our 2010
annual meeting of shareholders to be held on Wednesday, June 16, 2010 at the
corporate headquarters for Shoe Carnival, Inc. located at 7500 East Columbia
Street, Evansville, Indiana. The meeting will begin promptly at 9:00 a.m. C.D.T.
In addition to the
matters described in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Common Shareholders and
Proxy Statement, I will be providing a report on the financial position of the
Company and opening the floor for questions from shareholders.
The members of the
Board and management look forward to your attendance. However, whether or not
you plan to attend personally, and regardless of the number of shares you own,
it is important that your shares be represented. Please be sure you are
represented at the meeting by signing, dating and mailing your proxy card
promptly. A postage-paid return envelope is enclosed for your
convenience.
Thank you for your
ongoing support of and continued interest in Shoe Carnival.
Sincerely,
Mark L. Lemond
President and Chief Executive Officer
SHOE CARNIVAL, INC.
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON JUNE 16, 2010
The annual meeting
of common shareholders of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the "Company") will be held at
the Company's corporate headquarters located at 7500 East Columbia Street,
Evansville, Indiana, on Wednesday, June 16, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., C.D.T., for the
following purposes:
(1) To elect one director to serve until
the 2013 annual meeting of shareholders and until his successor is elected and
has qualified, as set forth in the accompanying proxy
statement;
(2) To ratify the appointment of Deloitte
& Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the
Company for fiscal 2010; and
(3) To transact such other business
as may properly come before the meeting.
All common
shareholders of record at the close of business on April 16, 2010 will be
eligible to vote.
It is important
that your stock be represented at this meeting. Whether or not you expect to be
present, please fill in, date, sign and return the enclosed proxy form in the
accompanying addressed, postage-paid envelope. If you attend the meeting, your
proxy will be canceled at your request.
Important Notice Regarding the
Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Common
Shareholders to be held on June 16, 2010
In accordance with
the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are advising our
shareholders of the availability on the Internet of our proxy materials related
to the annual meeting described above. These rules allow companies to provide
access to proxy materials in one of two ways. Because we have elected to utilize
the “full set delivery” option, we are delivering to all shareholders paper
copies of all of the proxy materials, as well as providing access to those proxy
materials on a publicly accessible website.
The notice of
annual meeting of common shareholders, proxy statement, form of proxy card and
annual report to shareholders are available at http://www.shoecarnival.com/Investors/ProxyInformation.aspx.
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
Proxy Q & A |
1 |
Proposal No. 1 Election of a Director |
4 |
Information Regarding the Board of
Directors and Committees |
|
Board Meetings |
6 |
Board Leadership
Structure |
6 |
Board
Committees |
7 |
Board and
Committee Role in Risk Oversight |
8 |
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics |
8 |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance |
8 |
Executive and Director Compensation |
|
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis |
9 |
Compensation
Committee Report |
16 |
Compensation-Related
Risk Assessment |
16 |
Summary
Compensation Table |
17 |
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards |
18 |
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End |
19 |
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in
Fiscal 2009 |
20 |
Equity
Compensation Plan Information |
20 |
Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation |
21 |
Termination and Change-in-Control
Arrangements |
22 |
Compensation of
Non-Employee Directors |
26 |
Proposal No. 2 Ratification of Our Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm |
28 |
Audit Committee Matters |
28 |
Transactions with Related Persons |
29 |
Principal Shareholders |
30 |
Shareholder Proposals for 2011 Annual Meeting |
31 |
Shareholder
Communications |
32 |
Incorporation by Reference |
32 |
Annual Reports |
32 |
Proxy Card |
|
SHOE CARNIVAL, INC.
7500 East Columbia Street
Evansville,
Indiana 47715
PROXY STATEMENT
Annual Meeting of Common Shareholders
June 16, 2010
Why am I receiving these proxy materials?
We are providing
these proxy materials to you in connection with the solicitation by the Board of
Directors (the "Board") of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the "Company," "we", "us" or
"our") for proxies to be voted at our annual meeting of common shareholders. We
are holding this annual meeting at 9:00 a.m., C.D.T., on Wednesday, June 16,
2010, at our corporate headquarters located at 7500 East Columbia Street,
Evansville, Indiana. The approximate date on which these proxy materials are
first being sent to shareholders is on or about May 10, 2010.
In accordance with
the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, in addition to mailing a
full set of the proxy materials to our shareholders, we are also providing
access to our proxy materials on a publicly accessible website. Our notice of
annual meeting of common shareholders, proxy statement, form of proxy card and
annual report to shareholders are available at http://www.shoecarnival.com/Investors/ProxyInformation.aspx.
What proposals will be voted on at the
annual meeting?
There are two
proposals scheduled to be voted on at the annual meeting:
- To elect one director to serve
until the 2013 annual meeting of shareholders and until his successor is
elected and has qualified; and
- To ratify the appointment of
Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm
for fiscal 2010.
In addition, any
other business that may properly come before the annual meeting will be
considered and voted on. The Board currently knows of no additional business
that is to be brought before the meeting. However, if other matters properly
come before the meeting, the persons indicated on the enclosed proxy will vote
that proxy based on their judgment on such matters.
How does the Board recommend that I vote
on the proposals?
The Board
recommends that you vote your shares "FOR" the election of Mr. Mark L. Lemond as
director (Proposal 1) and "FOR" the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte
& Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal
2010 (Proposal 2).
Who may vote?
You may vote at the
annual meeting or by proxy if you were a shareholder of record at the close of
business on April 16, 2010, the record date for the meeting. As of April 16,
2010, there were 13,176,758 shares of our common stock outstanding and entitled
to vote at the meeting. On all matters, including the election of a director,
each common shareholder will have one vote for each share held.
- 1 -
What constitutes a quorum for the annual
meeting?
In order to
constitute a quorum, a majority of the votes entitled to be cast at the annual
meeting must be present either in person or by proxy. Abstentions and broker
non-votes will be considered as present for the purpose of determining a
quorum.
It is possible that
a proxy would indicate that not all shares represented by it are being voted for
specific proposals. For example, a broker cannot vote shares held in street name
on certain proposals when the owner of those shares has not provided
instructions on how he or she would like them to be voted, which are called
"broker non-votes." Due to a recent change, Proposal 1, The Election of a
Director, now falls into this category. Accordingly, if you hold your shares in
street name and wish your shares to be voted in the election of our director,
you must give your broker voting instructions.
What vote is required for each of the
proposals to be approved?
For Proposal 1, the
director receiving a plurality of the votes cast "FOR" will be elected. Neither
abstentions nor broker non-votes will affect the outcome of this proposal.
Proposal 2 will be
approved if more shares are voted "FOR" the proposal than "AGAINST". Neither
abstentions nor broker non-votes will affect the outcome of this
proposal.
How do I vote my shares?
Voting of Shares Registered Directly in
the Name of the Shareholder. If you hold shares of our common stock in your own name as the holder
of record, you may vote your shares by signing, dating and mailing the proxy
card in the postage-paid envelope that has been provided to you. Shares held
directly in your name as the shareholder of record may also be voted in person
at the annual meeting. If you choose to vote in person at the meeting, please
bring proof of identification. Even if you plan to attend the annual meeting, we
recommend that you vote your shares in advance so that your vote will be counted
if you later decide not to attend the meeting.
Voting of Shares Registered in the Name
of a Brokerage Firm or Bank. If your shares of our common stock are held in "street name" through a
brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you will receive instructions
from your nominee, which you must follow in order to have your shares voted. If
you are a "street name" shareholder and you wish to vote in person at the annual
meeting, you must obtain a legal proxy from your nominee giving you the right to
vote the shares. Even if you plan to attend the annual meeting, we recommend
that you vote your shares in advance so that your vote will be counted if you
later decide not to attend the meeting.
What if I return my proxy card but do not
provide voting instructions?
Your shares will be
voted in accordance with your instructions as specified on your proxy card. If
you sign and return your proxy card but do not give voting instructions, your
shares will be voted "FOR" the election of the nominee listed under Proposal 1
and "FOR" Proposal 2. If any other matters properly come before the meeting, the
persons indicated on the enclosed proxy will vote that proxy based on their
judgment on such matters.
May I revoke my proxy?
If you have
executed and submitted your proxy, you may still revoke it at any time as long
as it has not been exercised. Your proxy may be revoked by giving written notice
of revocation to us, executing a subsequently dated proxy that is delivered to
us, or attending the annual meeting and voting in person.
How are votes counted?
Votes cast by proxy
or in person at the annual meeting will be counted and certified by
representatives of our transfer agent, Computershare Investor Services LLC.
- 2 -
Where can I find the voting results of
the annual meeting?
We will announce
preliminary voting results at the annual meeting and publish final results in a
Form 8-K to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within four
business days of the annual meeting.
Who pays for the cost of proxy
preparation and solicitation?
The cost of this
solicitation of proxies will be borne by us. Proxies may also be solicited
personally or by telephone, facsimile transmission or other electronic means of
communication by our employees acting without additional compensation.
- 3 -
PROPOSAL NO. 1
ELECTION OF A DIRECTOR
Nominee and Director Information
We currently have
five directors divided into three classes. Each director holds office for a
three-year term expiring at the annual meeting of shareholders held in the year
that is three years after his election and thereafter until his successor is
elected and qualified.
The shareholders
will be asked to elect one director at the annual meeting. Mark L. Lemond has
been nominated by the Board, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee (the "Nominating Committee"), for election as a
director for a term to expire at the 2013 annual meeting of shareholders and
until his successor is elected and qualified. Mr. Lemond has served as a
director since 1988.
The Nominating
Committee is responsible for approving and recommending to the Board the
director nominees that collectively have the complementary experience,
qualifications, skills and attributes to guide us and function effectively as a
Board. Each nominee for election as a director is selected based on his
experience, judgment, integrity, ability to make independent inquiries, an
understanding of our business environment and a willingness to devote adequate
time to Board duties. It is the Nominating Committee's general view to
re-nominate an incumbent director who continues to satisfy the criteria for
membership on the Board, continues to make important contributions to the Board
and consents to continue his service on the Board.
Set forth below is
the current nominee for director as well as our continuing directors and
information regarding each person's service as a director, business experience,
director positions held currently or at any time in the last five years,
information regarding involvement in certain legal or administrative
proceedings, if applicable, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or
skills that caused the Nominating Committee and the Board to recommend the
director nominee and to determine that the continuing directors should serve as
members of our Board. Unless otherwise indicated, the principal occupation of
each director has been the same for the last five years. There is no family
relationship between any of our directors or executive officers.
NOMINEE FOR DIRECTOR |
|
Mark
L. Lemond, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
Mr. Lemond has served as our
President and Chief Executive Officer since September 1996 and has held
various managerial and financial positions since joining the Company in
1987.
Mr. Lemond's areas of relevant
experience include detailed knowledge and unique perspective and insights
regarding the strategic and operational opportunities and challenges,
economic and industry trends, and competitive and financial positioning of
the Company and our brand within the retail industry.
Term: Director nominee for a
three-year term to expire at the annual meeting of shareholders in 2013
Director since: 1988 Age: 55
|
- 4 -
DIRECTORS CONTINUING IN OFFICE |
|
J.
Wayne Weaver, Chairman of the Board |
|
Mr. Weaver presently serves as
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Jacksonville Jaguars, LTD, a
professional football franchise. He also serves as the managing member of
LC Footwear, LLC, a footwear distributor.
From 1978 until February 2, 1993,
Mr. Weaver's principal occupation was as president and chief executive
officer of Nine West Group, Inc., a designer, developer and marketer of
women's footwear. From November 2000 until April 2008, Mr.
Weaver also served as a director on
the Board of Stein Mart, Inc., a publicly traded chain of off-price retail
stores.
Mr. Weaver's areas of relevant
experience include strategic planning, marketing/branding, economic
indicators and issues, and industry trends.
Term: Director with term expiring
at the annual meeting of shareholders in 2011 Director since: 1988
Age: 75
|
|
Gerald W.
Schoor
|
|
Mr. Schoor presently is a
self-employed merchant banker. Prior to January 1997, he was employed as
president of Corporate Finance Associates, St. Louis, a financial
intermediary, and as executive vice president of National Industrial
Services, Inc., an industrial asset management company.
Mr. Schoor's areas of relevant
experience include capital markets, banking and corporate finance,
insurance and risk management, economic indicators and issues, and
government regulation.
Term: Director with term expiring
at the annual meeting of shareholders in 2011 Director since: 1993
Age: 75
|
|
William E.
Bindley
|
|
Mr. Bindley presently serves as
Chairman of the Board of Bindley Capital Partners, LLC, a private equity
investment fund. He also serves as a trustee on the Board of Kite Realty
Group Trust, a publicly traded real estate investment company specializing
in retail and commercial properties.
From 1968 until February 2001, Mr.
Bindley's principal occupation was chairman of the board and chief
executive officer of Bindley Western Industries, Inc., a pharmaceutical
wholesale distribution company. From July 1994 until October 2005, he
served as chairman of the board for Priority Healthcare Corporation, a
publicly traded specialty pharmacy and pharmaceutical distributor, and
from July 1994 until May 1997, he also served as its chief executive
officer.
Mr. Bindley's areas of relevant
experience include capital markets, banking and corporate finance,
distribution, strategic planning, insurance and risk management, economic
indicators and issues, and government regulation.
Term: Director with term expiring
at the annual meeting of shareholders in 2012 Director since: 1993
Age: 69
|
- 5 -
Kent A.
Kleeberger |
Mr.
Kleeberger has served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer of Chico's FAS Inc., a publicly traded specialty apparel
retailer since, November 2007.
From July
2004 until October 2007, Mr. Kleeberger served as senior vice president
and chief financial officer for Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., a publicly
traded single price-point retailer. From April 1998 until June 2004, he
served in various positions with Tween Brands, Inc. (formerly Too,
Inc.), a publicly traded apparel retailer, including as executive vice
president, chief financial officer, treasurer and secretary.
Mr.
Kleeberger's areas of relevant experience include tax, financial
reporting, accounting and controls, insurance and risk management,
economic indicators and issues, marketing/branding, and government
regulation.
Term:
Director with term expiring at the annual meeting of shareholders in
2012 Director since: 2003 Age:
58
|
The Board recommends a vote FOR the
director nominee listed above.
INFORMATION REGARDING THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
AND COMMITTEES
The primary
functions of our Board are:
- To oversee management
performance on behalf of our shareholders;
- To ensure that the long-term
interests of our shareholders are being served; and
- To monitor adherence to and
the effectiveness of our internal standards and policies.
Board Meetings
During fiscal 2009,
the Board held four meetings. Each director during fiscal 2009 attended at least
75% of the total Board meetings and the meetings of the respective committees on
which he served. Directors are expected to attend the annual meeting of
shareholders each year, and each of our directors attended our 2009 annual
meeting of shareholders.
Board Leadership
Structure
The Board has
determined at this time that the separation of the offices of Chairman of the
Board and President/Chief Executive Officer enhances Board independence and
oversight. Moreover, the separation of these positions allows the
President/Chief Executive Officer to better focus on his responsibilities of
running the Company, enhancing shareholder value and expanding and strengthening
our brand while allowing the Chairman of the Board to lead the Board in its
fundamental role of providing advice to and independent oversight of
management.
A majority of our
directors are "independent directors" as defined by the listing standards of The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC ("NASDAQ"), and the Board has determined that such
independent directors have no relationship with us that would interfere with the
exercise of their independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a
director. The independent directors are Messrs. Bindley, Kleeberger and Schoor.
Mr. Schoor has been designated as the Lead Director, and presides at all
executive sessions of the non-management directors. Following an executive
session, the Lead Director discusses any issues or requested actions to be taken
with the President/Chief Executive Officer.
The Board evaluates
its leadership structure on an ongoing basis and may change it as circumstances
warrant.
- 6
-
Board Committees
The Board has an
Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee. Each of the committees operates pursuant to a written
charter, which can be viewed on our website at www.shoecarnival.com under
Investors--Corporate Governance.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee
is solely responsible for the selection and hiring of the independent registered
public accounting firm to audit our books and records and pre-approves audit and
permitted non-audit services undertaken by the independent registered public
accounting firm. It is also responsible for the review of our (i) financial
reports and other financial information, (ii) systems of internal controls
regarding finance, accounting, legal compliance and ethics, (iii) auditing,
accounting and financial reporting processes, and (iv) financial and enterprise
risk exposures. See "Board and Committee Role in Risk Oversight." The committee
approves all related person transactions, including our relationships with LC
Footwear, LLC and PL Footwear, Inc. described under "Transactions with Related
Persons – Current Transactions" and meets with management and our independent
registered public accounting firm as necessary.
The Audit Committee
is comprised of our three non-employee directors: Messrs. Kleeberger (Chair),
Bindley and Schoor. Our Board has established the Audit Committee in accordance
with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). The Board and the Audit Committee believe the current member
composition satisfies the listing standards of NASDAQ governing audit committee
composition, including the requirement that the audit committee members all be
"independent" directors, as that term for audit committee members is defined in
the listing standards of NASDAQ and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. The Board
has also determined that Mr. Kleeberger qualifies as the "audit committee
financial expert" as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission rules
adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Audit Committee met
seven times during fiscal 2009, with three of these meetings being conducted via
teleconference.
Compensation
Committee
The Compensation
Committee is responsible for evaluating and approving our director and officer
compensation plans, policies and programs. The committee also administers our
equity compensation and retirement plans and reviews the risks related to our
compensation policies and programs. For a detailed description of the roles of
the Compensation Committee and management in setting compensation, see
"Executive and Director Compensation – Compensation Discussion and
Analysis".
The Compensation
Committee consists of our three non-employee directors: Messrs. Bindley (Chair),
Kleeberger and Schoor. Each of the members is "independent", as such term for
compensation committee members is defined in the listing standards of NASDAQ,
each is a "Non-Employee Director" as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange
Act and each is an "Outside Director" as defined by the regulations under
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Internal
Revenue Code"). During fiscal 2009, none of the members were involved in a
relationship requiring disclosure as an interlocking executive officer/director
or as a former officer or employee. In addition, none of the members were
involved in a relationship requiring disclosure under Item 404(a) of Regulation
S-K. The Compensation Committee held three meetings during fiscal
2009.
Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee
The Nominating
Committee exercises a leadership role in shaping our corporate governance and
recommends to the Board corporate governance principles on a number of topics,
including (i) Board organization, membership and function, (ii) committee
structure and membership, and (iii) oversight of evaluation of the Board. As the
nominating body of the Board, the committee also interviews, evaluates,
nominates and recommends individuals for membership on the Board and on the
various committees of the Board. Nominees will be evaluated based on their
experience, judgment, integrity, ability to make independent inquiries,
understanding of our business environment and willingness to devote adequate
time to Board duties.
- 7
-
Our Corporate
Governance Guidelines provide that in identifying potential director nominees,
our Nominating Committee is to take into account geographic, occupational,
gender, race and age diversity. Broadly defined, diversity means diversity of
viewpoints, background, experience and other demographics. The committee
implements that policy, and assesses its effectiveness, by examining the
diversity of all of the directors on the Board when it selects nominees for
directors. The diversity of directors is one of the factors that the Nominating
Committee considers, along with the other selection criteria described
above.
The Nominating
Committee also will consider director candidates recommended by shareholders. A
shareholder who wishes to recommend a director candidate for consideration
should send such recommendation to our Secretary at 7500 East Columbia Street,
Evansville, Indiana 47715, who will forward it to the Nominating Committee. Any
such recommendation should include a description of the candidate's
qualifications for board service, the candidate's written consent to be
considered for nomination and to serve if nominated and elected, and addresses
and telephone numbers for contacting the shareholder and the candidate for more
information. A shareholder who wishes to nominate an individual as a director
candidate at an annual meeting of shareholders, rather than recommend the
individual to the Nominating Committee as a nominee, must comply with the
advance notice requirements set forth in our by-laws, a copy of which may be
obtained from our Secretary. A summary of such requirements is provided in this
proxy statement under "Shareholder Proposals for 2011 Annual
Meeting".
The Nominating
Committee consists of our three non-employee directors: Messrs. Schoor (Chair),
Bindley and Kleeberger. Each member is "independent," as such term for
nominating committee members is defined in the listing standards of NASDAQ. The
Nominating Committee met four times during fiscal 2009.
Board and Committee Role in Risk
Oversight
While the Board has
the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, various
committees assist in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in certain areas
of risk. In particular, the Audit Committee focuses on financial and enterprise
risk exposures, including internal controls. The Audit Committee discusses with
management, internal audit, and the independent registered public accounting
firm our major financial risk exposures, including risks related to fraud,
liquidity and regulatory compliance, our policies with respect to risk
assessment and risk management, and the steps management has taken to monitor
and control such exposures. The Board also periodically receives information
about our risk management activities and the most significant risks we face.
This is principally accomplished through Audit Committee reports to the Board
and summary briefings provided by management. The Audit Committee members, as
well as each other director, also have access to our Chief Financial Officer and
any other members of our management for discussions between meetings as
warranted.
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND
ETHICS
We have adopted a
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the "Ethics Code") that applies to all of
our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive
officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer. The
Ethics Code is posted on our website at www.shoecarnival.com under
Investors--Corporate Governance. We intend to disclose any amendments to the
Ethics Code by posting such amendments on our website. In addition, any waivers
of the Ethics Code for our directors or executive officers will be disclosed in
a Current Report on Form 8-K.
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING
COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of
the Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who
own more than 10% of our common stock, to file initial reports of ownership and
reports of changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Such persons are required by Securities and Exchange Commission regulations to
furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on a
review of the copies of such forms furnished to us and written representations
from certain reporting persons, we believe that during fiscal 2009 all filing
requirements applicable to our executive officers, directors and greater than
10% shareholders were timely satisfied.
- 8
-
EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and
Analysis
Overview
We are one of the
nation’s largest family footwear retailers, offering customers a broad
assortment of moderately priced dress, casual and athletic footwear for men,
women and children with an emphasis on national and regional name brands. We
differentiate our retail concept from our competitors' by our distinctive,
highly promotional in-store marketing effort and large stores that average
10,900 square feet, generate an average of approximately $2.2 million in annual
sales and house an average inventory of approximately 26,000 pairs of shoes per
location. As of January 30, 2010, we operated 311 stores in 30 states primarily
in the Midwest, South and Southeast regions of the United States.
This Compensation
Discussion and Analysis is intended to supplement the more detailed information
concerning executive compensation that appears in the tables and the narrative
discussion that follows the tables. Our goal is to provide shareholders with a
better understanding of our compensation policies and programs and the material
decisions made under those policies and programs that affect the compensation
payable to our executive officers, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, Chairman of the Board and two additional executive officers
named in the Summary Compensation Table (our "Executives").
Our Compensation
Committee (the "Committee") is responsible for establishing our compensation
philosophy and strategies and has overall responsibility for approving and
evaluating the director and officer compensation plans, policies and programs.
Annually, the Committee reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives
relevant to Executive compensation, evaluates each Executive’s individual
performance as well as their collective performance in light of these goals and
objectives, and sets compensation levels based on this evaluation. The Committee
believes its obligation is to structure programs that best serve the Company's
interests and the interests of our shareholders. The Committee currently
consists of three directors, none of whom is a current or former employee and
each of whom is deemed independent as defined in the listing standards of
NASDAQ. The Compensation Committee Report immediately follows this
discussion.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives of
the Overall Compensation Program
Our compensation
philosophy is to design programs to attract, retain and motivate the finest
talent possible for all levels of the organization. In addition, the programs
are designed to maintain a performance and achievement-oriented environment, to
be cost-competitive, to treat all employees fairly and to maximize the tax
deductibility of employee compensation. All programs have the following
characteristics:
- Compensation is based on the
level of job responsibility, the individual's level of performance and the
Company's overall performance. As employees assume greater responsibility, a
larger portion of their total compensation should be "at risk" incentive
compensation (both annual and long-term), subject to corporate and individual
performance metrics.
- A combination of short-term
compensation in the form of base salaries and annual cash incentives and
long-term equity based compensation in the form of service-based and
performance-based restricted stock awards and stock option grants are utilized
to provide incentive to Executives to create shareholder value through the
attainment of both short and long-term goals.
- Compensation also takes into
consideration the value of the job in the marketplace. To retain our highly
skilled work force, we strive to remain competitive with the pay of employers
who compete with us for talent.
The Committee,
along with management, recognizes that the challenges faced by an
entrepreneurial and growth-orientated retail organization requires that
compensation programs remain flexible to meet the prevailing market conditions
for key management roles. Determination of appropriate compensation for our
Executives is based on the Committee's in-depth knowledge of our operations and
the competitive environment in which we operate, along with the accumulated
business expertise of the members of the Committee. This process is inherently
subjective, but we do not believe that a purely formula-driven approach to
compensation can adequately take into account all of the various aspects that
will lead to our long-term success.
- 9
-
Regarding most
compensation matters, including Executive and director compensation, management
provides recommendations to the Committee; however, the Committee does not
delegate any of its functions to others in setting compensation. The Committee
does not currently utilize external consultants in Executive or director
compensation matters; however, the Committee does review comparisons to other
retailers compiled by management. Details of our review process are contained in
"Determination of Compensation Amounts" on page 11.
What the Compensation Program is Designed
to Reward
The Committee
emphasizes the relationship of compensation to performance. In evaluating the
Company's performance and the contribution of the Executives, the Committee
generally considers increases in store growth, sales, operating income, net
earnings and earnings per share as compared to both the financial plan for the
year and prior year performance. The Committee also evaluates free cash flow
generated by the Company, management's success in managing merchandise
inventories and the impact of prevailing economic conditions. In the current
difficult economic climate, management's ability to position the Company to
emphasize financial stability and liquidity while protecting market share is
paramount.
Compensation Program Components, Why Each
Component Is Chosen and How Each Component Relates To Our Compensation Philosophy and
Objectives
The basic
components of our Executive compensation program consist of base salary, annual
cash incentives, long-term equity based incentives and other benefits, which
include retirement plans, health and welfare benefits, limited perquisites and
other fringe benefits.
Base Salary
The base salary
component provides for fixed compensation and rewards the core competencies of
each Executive relative to skill set, experience, tenure and individual
performance.
Annual Cash
Incentives
We typically
utilize a performance-based cash incentive program, which is designed to reward
the Executives’ focus on meeting annual financial goals that will lead to our
long-term success. Under our 2006 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan,
performance targets may be based on one or more of the following business
criteria: annual return to shareholders, net income, net income before
nonrecurring items, net sales, operating income, return on assets, return on
equity, EPS, EBITDA or EBITDA before nonrecurring items. Each of the foregoing
business criteria may also be calculated before bonus expense.
The Committee
annually selects the business criteria that performance targets will be based
on, determines the minimum threshold, target and maximum performance target
levels and sets the percentage of salary each Executive can earn for achievement
of the performance target levels. The Committee utilizes financial projections
prepared by management in setting the performance targets. These projections
incorporate various assumptions related to attainable comparative store sales
increases, merchandise gross margin, new store openings and selling, general and
administrative expense levels. These projections attempt to incorporate the
known risk factors inherent with the current economic retail climate and present
both the challenges and opportunities facing the Company. The parameters under
which the program will be administered are established by the Committee,
typically within the first 60 days of each fiscal year. Mr. Weaver, Chairman of
our Board, has not participated in the 2006 Executive Incentive Compensation
Plan in the past and is not expected to do so in the future.
We may also award
discretionary cash bonuses to Executives for their work on special projects, for
promotions, when the Committee seeks to align compensation levels more closely
to market conditions or when the Committee otherwise determines.
- 10
-
Long-Term Equity Based
Incentives
We consider equity
compensation, in the form of restricted stock or stock options, to be an
important element in the overall compensation of our Executives and other key
employees. Equity based incentive awards that typically vest over time, or upon
the achievement of long-term goals, help to retain Executives and encourage them
to manage through difficult periods and to improve our long-term performance.
This philosophy serves to more closely align the interests of our Executives
with the interests of our shareholders.
We currently
utilize both performance-based and service-based restricted stock awards as our
primary forms of equity based incentive compensation. The vesting of
performance-based awards is tied to the attainment of defined increases in
earnings per diluted share and rewards each Executive for the creation of
shareholder value. Up to 100% of the number of shares of restricted stock may be
forfeited if the performance goals are not achieved within a six-year window of
time. Restricted stock awards with only service-based vesting are utilized on a
limited basis as appropriate when retention or recruitment is our primary and
immediate objective. These awards are issued pursuant to the terms and
conditions of the 2000 Stock Option Plan.
Mr. Weaver does not
receive long-term equity based incentive awards.
Other Benefits
We provide the
Executives with health and welfare programs, a 401(k) retirement plan and
employee benefit plans, programs and arrangements generally available to all
employees. We also provide the Executives, along with all of our other officers,
other executive benefit programs and perquisites in order to provide a
competitive executive compensation program and to foster executive
retention.
The additional
levels of benefits available to the Executives (other than Mr. Weaver, who does
not participate in any of our sponsored benefit plans) include an executive life
insurance program, an executive long-term disability program, additional medical
benefits and a nonqualified deferred compensation plan. The life insurance and
long-term disability programs provide the Executives with life and disability
benefits greater than the benefits available under our standard broad-based life
insurance and long-term disability programs. The additional medical benefits
serve to supplement our standard health benefits program and provide additional
reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses including co-payments and deductibles.
The nonqualified deferred compensation plan is offered to the Executives due to
the federally mandated maximum deferral limitation under our 401(k) plan. The
nonqualified deferred compensation plan provides benefits comparable to those
which would be available under our 401(k) plan if the federal regulations did
not include limits on covered compensation and benefits. Further details on the
nonqualified deferred compensation plan can be found under "Non-Equity Based
Compensation – Narrative Discussion" on page 21. In addition, we currently offer
limited perquisites to each Executive other than Mr. Weaver. Details of our
perquisites are contained in footnote 4 to the Summary Compensation Table on
page 17.
Determination of Compensation
Amounts
It is the
Committee’s intention to set total Executive compensation at a level to attract
and retain a talented and motivated leadership team and balance the perception
of other stakeholders that Executive compensation is reasonably competitive. In
making compensation decisions, the Committee reviews executive compensation
practices within the retail and footwear industries with consideration given to,
among other factors, differences in sales, growth rates and total market
capitalization. Our retail peer group consists of leading apparel retailers with
sales greater than $425 million and less than $1.9 billion. Our footwear peer
group consists of leading footwear retailers. We do not limit our comparisons to
only footwear retailers as our competition for talent falls within a wide range
of companies and industries.
The Committee also
utilizes a tally sheet to review the total compensation package provided to the
Executives for the current and prior three fiscal years. The tally sheet sets
forth the dollar amounts of all components including base salary, annual cash
incentives, long-term equity based incentives, the incremental expense related
to the additional level of benefits provided to Executives and perquisites. The
tally sheet is supplemented by a summary of stock ownership and other equity
interests (both vested and unvested) in the Company as well as a summary of
accumulated wealth for each Executive derived from the vesting or exercise of
equity incentives. The stock ownership and accumulated wealth of the Executives
did not influence the Committee's decision on equity-based compensation awards
in fiscal 2009.
- 11
-
Executives are
compensated through a combination of short-term compensation components (base
salary and annual cash incentives) and long-term equity based incentives. The
Committee does not have a specific policy for the allocation of compensation
between short and long-term components or cash and equity based compensation.
The Committee establishes all performance targets associated with compensation
program components in a manner to encourage achievement of increases in
shareholder value. In setting total compensation, the Committee applies a
consistent approach for all Executives and applies appropriate business judgment
in how the standard approach is applied to the facts and circumstances
associated with each Executive. Although the Committee reviews compensation data
of peer group companies, it does not benchmark the compensation of the
Executives utilizing the peer group data. Instead, the Committee only utilizes
our peer group data to determine whether the types and amount of Executive
compensation are reasonable and competitive in view of the peer group data. The
peer group information is compiled by our management and provided to the
Committee for its use. Amounts earned by each Executive in fiscal 2007, 2008 and
2009 are detailed in the Summary Compensation Table following this section.
Our current peer
groups are comprised of the following companies:
Retail Companies With Sales Greater
Than $425 Million and Less Than $1.9 Billion |
Aeropostale Inc. |
Stage Stores, Inc. |
Casual Male Retail Group, Inc. |
The Buckle, Inc. |
Chico’s FAS, Inc. |
The Cato Corporation |
Christopher & Banks Corp. |
The Dress Barn, Inc. |
Hibbett Sports, Inc. |
The Gymboree Corporation |
Hot Topic, Inc. |
The Wet Seal, Inc. |
Mothers Work,
Inc. |
Urban Outfitters,
Inc. |
|
Footwear
Companies |
Brown Shoe Company, Inc. |
K-Swiss Inc. |
Collective Brands, Inc. |
Nike, Inc. |
Columbia Sportswear Company |
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. |
Crocs, Inc. |
Steven Madden, Ltd. |
DSW Inc. |
The Finish Line, Inc. |
Foot Locker, Inc. |
The Timberland Company |
Genesco Inc. |
Wolverine World Wide, Inc. |
Kenneth Cole
Productions, Inc. |
|
Base Salary
The Committee
reviews and approves salaries for the Chief Executive Officer and other
Executives on an annual basis or at other times as necessary to accommodate the
hiring of new employees, promotions or other considerations. The Chief Executive
Officer provides recommendations to the Committee for those reporting directly
to him. Recommended base salaries are reviewed and set based on a number of
factors, including job responsibilities, individual industry experience,
individual performance, the Company's overall performance and industry data for
comparable positions. No predetermined weight is given to any of the above
factors.
Salary increases
for the Executives have averaged approximately 2.3% annually for the past three
years. Certain Executives have received greater salary increases corresponding
to expanded responsibilities as a result of our continued growth. In particular,
we increased Mr. Jackson’s salary by approximately 20% in March 2007 in order to
make his compensation more competitive and to reflect his increasing
responsibilities.
In view of the
Company's financial performance in fiscal 2008 and the economic conditions in
the footwear industry and generally at the end of fiscal 2008, the base salaries
for our Executives were not increased for fiscal 2009.
- 12
-
Annual Cash
Incentives
A portion of the
annual cash compensation the Executives could earn has for the past several
years included a performance-based bonus payment pursuant to the 2006 Executive
Incentive Compensation Plan. The Executives could also have been awarded
discretionary cash bonuses for their work on special projects, for promotions or
as the Committee otherwise determined. The Committee reviewed the 2006 Executive
Incentive Compensation Plan at its March 2009 meeting and determined that
realistic performance targets could not be set given the economic conditions at
that time in the footwear industry and generally. The Committee therefore
suspended the 2006 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan for fiscal 2009 and
determined that any bonuses awarded to Executives for fiscal 2009 would be at
the discretion of the Committee based on the Company's performance and other
subjective factors, including individual performance.
The Committee met
on March 16, 2010 to review our fiscal 2009 financial results.
Despite the
challenging retail environment, during fiscal 2009 we exceeded numerous internal
performance goals and reported significant increases over the prior year's
financial performance including:
- Total sales increased 5.4%
driven by a comparable store sales increase of 3.5%;
- The gross profit margin
increased to 28.4% as compared to 26.9% for fiscal 2008;
- Operating income increased by
over 200% to $25.1 million from $8.4 million for fiscal 2008;
- Net income increased to $15.2
million as compared to $5.3 million in fiscal 2008; and
- Diluted EPS increased to
$1.20 as compared to $0.43 in fiscal 2008.
As a result of the
significant improvement in financial performance and to recognize the individual
contributions of each Executive, the Committee approved a discretionary bonus
for Mr. Lemond at approximately 60% of his 2009 base salary, for Mr. Baker at
approximately 39% of his 2009 base salary, for Mr. Jackson at approximately 48%
of his 2009 base salary and for Mr. Sifford at approximately 45% of his 2009
base salary. The discretionary bonus percentages were based on the target
percentages of annual salary as defined under the 2006 Executive Incentive
Compensation Plan. Adjustments were made to the target percentages by individual
to reflect the Executive’s level of performance and job
responsibility.
Long-Term Equity Based
Incentives
Incentive awards
are granted pursuant to the 2000 Stock Option Plan at the discretion of the
Committee. The Committee relies in large part on the recommendation of our
Chairman and our Chief Executive Officer in determining the number of incentive
awards to be granted to Executives. With the exception of new employees and
promotions, incentive awards are typically granted on an annual basis at the
Committee’s regularly scheduled meeting in March of each year. This meeting is
scheduled in advance and occurs before the release of our fourth quarter and
annual earnings.
Based upon the
recommendation of our Chairman and our Chief Executive Officer, and in view of
the Company's financial performance in fiscal 2008 and the economic conditions
at that time, the Committee did not award options or restricted stock to any
Executive in fiscal 2009.
Other Benefits
At its meeting in
March 2009, and in view of the Company's financial performance in fiscal 2008
and the economic conditions at that time, the Committee suspended certain
perquisites provided to our Executives. Specifically, the Committee determined
that each Executive would be required to reimburse us for any automobile lease
payments or country club memberships paid by us for the remainder of fiscal
2009. At its meeting in June 2009, the Committee re-evaluated the perquisites
provided to our Executives. Based on our improved fiscal 2009 financial
performance through the date of its meeting, the Committee re-instituted the
automobile allowance provided to our Executives.
- 13
-
Deductibility of Compensation and Other
Related Issues
Section 162(m) of
the Internal Revenue Code generally provides that publicly held companies may
not deduct compensation paid to an Executive to the extent such compensation
exceeds $1 million per officer in any fiscal year. However, pursuant to
regulations issued by the Treasury Department, certain limited exceptions to
Section 162(m) apply with respect to "qualified performance-based compensation."
Our Compensation Committee believes that tax deductibility is an important
factor when evaluating executive compensation and has taken steps to provide
that these exceptions will generally apply to incentive compensation paid to the
Executives. However, our Compensation Committee may exercise its discretion to provide base
salaries or other compensation that may not be fully tax deductible to
us.
Section 409A of the
Internal Revenue Code provides certain requirements for deferred compensation
arrangements. Those requirements, among other things, limit flexibility with
respect to the time and form of payment of deferred compensation. If a payment
or award constitutes deferred compensation subject to Section 409A and the
applicable requirements are not satisfied, the recipient could be subject to tax
on the award and all other deferred compensation of the same type, and an
additional 20% tax and interest at the underpayment rate plus 1%, at the time
the legally binding right to the payment or award arises or, if later, when that
right ceases to be subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. We have made
modifications to our plans and our employment and noncompetition agreements with
our Executives such that payments or awards under those arrangements either are
intended to not constitute “deferred compensation” for Section 409A purposes
(and will thereby be exempt from Section 409A’s requirements) or, if they
constitute “deferred compensation,” are intended to comply with the Section 409A
statutory provisions and final regulations.
The Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 subjects our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer
to forfeiture of incentive compensation and profits from the sale of stock in
the event of an accounting restatement associated with non-compliance, as a
result of misconduct, with any financial reporting requirement under the
securities laws. Our Compensation Committee has not adopted at this time any
additional forfeiture provisions for incentive compensation.
Termination and Change-in-Control
Arrangements
We have entered
into an employment and noncompetition agreement with each of our Executives,
which specifies various payments to be made to the Executive in the event his
employment is terminated. The type and amount of payments vary by Executive and
the nature of the termination. We believe the severance benefits payable under
these agreements are competitive with general industry practices and that these
agreements serve to ensure the continued dedication of the Executive team and
minimize the likelihood of the transfer of trade secrets to our direct
competitors.
Mr. Lemond’s
employment and noncompetition agreement does not contain a specific
change-in-control provision; however, it does contain an assignment clause which
requires any successor company to assume the agreement. Therefore, upon a
change-in-control of the Company, the terms of the triggering events would still
apply upon Mr. Lemond’s termination from the Company. Messrs. Baker, Jackson and
Sifford’s individual employment and noncompetition agreements contain specific
types and amounts of payment in the event of a change-in-control.
Further information
on termination and change-in-control arrangements is contained under
"Termination and Change-in-Control Arrangements," beginning on page
22.
Fiscal 2010 Executive
Compensation
The Committee met
on March 16, 2010 and completed its review and approval of the fiscal 2010
corporate goals and objectives relevant to Executive compensation, evaluated
each Executive’s individual performance as well as their collective performance
in light of the prior year internal goals and objectives and set Executive
compensation levels for fiscal 2010 based on this evaluation. This process was
consistent with that performed in fiscal 2009.
- 14
-
The Committee
established the following with respect to Executive compensation for fiscal
2010:
1. |
|
The base salary for Mr. Lemond was increased by $21,500, Mr.
Jackson's base salary was increased by $25,000 and Mr. Sifford's base
salary was increased by $15,000. These increases were made to make each of
their respective salaries more competitive and for Messrs. Jackson and
Sifford to reflect their increasing responsibilities. |
|
2. |
|
The 2006 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, which was suspended
in fiscal 2009, was reinstated. |
|
|
|
For fiscal 2010, the Committee selected our operating income before
officer bonus expense ("Operating Income") as the business criteria for
all officers included in the plan and established the minimum threshold,
target and maximum performance target levels. These targets attempt to
incorporate the known risk factors inherent with the current economic
retail climate and present both the challenges and opportunities facing
the Company. The following table reflects the percentage of salary each
Executive could earn based upon the achievement of the various target
levels of Operating Income. These percentages were the same as those used
in fiscal 2008. |
|
|
Percentage of Annual Salary |
|
Name |
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
Mark L.
Lemond |
0% |
|
60% |
|
100% |
|
Timothy T. Baker |
0% |
|
45% |
|
75% |
|
W. Kerry
Jackson |
0% |
|
45% |
|
75% |
|
Clifton E. Sifford |
0% |
|
45% |
|
75% |
|
|
The minimum threshold for fiscal 2010 was selected as the Operating
Income achieved in fiscal 2009, or $26.8 million. If the minimum threshold
is met, the Executives will earn an incremental bonus, as a percentage of
their base salary, as the fiscal 2010 Operating Income exceeds the fiscal
2009 level. Upon the achievement of the target Operating Income for fiscal
2010, or $31.4 million, which is a 17% increase over Operating Income
recorded in fiscal 2009, each Executive would earn his target bonus. With
the achievement of 120% of the target Operating Income, or $37.7 million,
which is a 41% increase over Operating Income recorded in fiscal 2009,
each Executive would earn his maximum allowable bonus under the 2006
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan. The Committee, at its March 2011
meeting, will review the Company's financial results against these
goals. |
|
3. |
|
Based on the recommendation of our Chairman and our Chief Executive
Officer, the Committee granted an aggregate of 54,000 shares of
performance-based restricted stock to the Executives, excluding Mr.
Weaver, as follows: Mr. Lemond 18,000 shares; and Messrs. Baker, Jackson
and Sifford 12,000 shares each. An additional 68,000 shares were granted
to other members of management. One-third of these restricted shares vest
upon the achievement of annual earnings per diluted share of $1.40, a 17%
increase over fiscal 2009 earnings per diluted share; one-third vest upon
the achievement of annual earnings per diluted share of $1.61, a 15%
increase over the prior tier; and one-third vest upon the achievement of
annual earnings per diluted share of $1.85, a 15% increase over the prior
tier. Multiple tranches of these restricted shares may vest in a given
year. Any restricted shares that are unvested after six fiscal years will
be forfeited. |
|
|
|
Our Chairman and our Chief Executive Officer based their
recommendation for the fiscal 2010 restricted stock awards on a total of
approximately 1% of our then outstanding shares, with consideration given
to the dilutive effect of the proposed grant. Recommendation of the
allocation of shares amongst members of management was made based on the
individual’s potential for making significant contributions in the future
and the relative importance of the individual’s position to others in our
organization. No other forms of equity-based compensation were recommended
or awarded to the Executives. |
|
4. |
|
The other executive benefit programs and perquisites described
above under "Other Benefits" were not changed, except that Mr. Lemond will
be allowed limited personal use of our Company-owned
aircraft. |
- 15 -
Compensation Committee Report
We have reviewed
and discussed with Company management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act. Based on the
review and discussion referred to above, we recommended to the Board that the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010 and in our proxy statement for
the 2010 annual meeting of shareholders for filing under the Exchange Act.
Compensation Committee
William E.
Bindley (Chair)
Kent A.
Kleeberger
Gerald W.
Schoor
Compensation-Related Risk
Assessment
In March 2010, our
Compensation Committee reviewed our compensation policies and practices for all
employees, including our Executives, and the risks that could arise from our
compensation policies and practices. As part of the Compensation Committee’s
review, it specifically noted the following factors that reduce the likelihood
of excessive risk-taking:
- Our overall compensation
levels are competitive with the market.
- There is a balanced mix of
cash and equity and annual and longer-term incentive
compensation.
- While the performance
criteria used under our 2006 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan has
historically been operating income achieved in a particular fiscal year, the
overall compensation of our Executives is not overly-weighted toward this
annual measurement period.
- For fiscal years like 2009
where the Compensation Committee determined that realistic performance targets
could not be set due to external factors, the Committee suspended the 2006
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan.
- Our 2006 Executive Incentive
Compensation Plan has payouts at multiple levels of performance. Assuming achievement of at least a
minimum level of performance, payouts under the plan result in some
compensation at levels below full target achievement, rather than an
“all-or-nothing” approach. The maximum bonus percentage payable under the 2006
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan is also capped at percentages ranging
from 100% to 75% of the Executives’ annualized base salary to protect against
disproportionately large shorter-term incentives.
- The Compensation Committee
has the discretion to reduce performance-based awards when it determines that
such adjustments would be appropriate based on our interests and the interests
of our shareholders.
- We currently do not grant
stock options to our Executives.
- The performance-based
restricted stock awards granted to our Executives vest based on our
achievement of certain earnings per diluted share targets, aligning the
interests of our Executives with those of our shareholders.
- Some of our non-executive
employees are eligible to receive bonus and equity awards. With respect to the
non-executive employees’ bonus awards, the performance criteria and targets
are not unreasonable or clearly unattainable without excessive risk-taking.
For those non-executive employees who are eligible to receive equity awards,
the equity awards typically vest over three years.
Based on these
factors, the Compensation Committee believes that our compensation policies and
practices encourage behaviors that are aligned with our long-term interests, and
that any short-term incentives do not make up a significant portion of
compensation and do not encourage our employees to take risks for short-term
gain. As a result, the Compensation Committee determined that any risks arising
from our compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a
material adverse effect on the Company.
- 16 -
Summary Compensation Table
The following table
sets forth a summary of the compensation paid by us for services rendered in all
capacities to us during each of the three most recent fiscal years to our Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and each of our three other most
highly compensated executive officers (our "Executives"), based on total
compensation earned in fiscal 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
Option |
|
Compensation |
|
Compensation |
|
|
|
Name and Principal
Position |
|
(1) |
|
Salary |
|
Bonus
(2) |
|
(3) |
|
Awards |
|
(4) |
|
(5) |
|
Total |
Mark L. Lemond, |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
703,500 |
|
$ |
422,100 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
58,986 |
|
$ |
1,184,586 |
President and Chief Executive
Officer |
|
2008 |
|
|
703,500 |
|
|
- |
|
|
465,500 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
79,082 |
|
|
1,248,082 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
701,568 |
|
|
- |
|
|
588,400 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
68,964 |
|
|
1,358,932 |
|
J. Wayne Weaver, |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
300,000 |
Chairman of the Board |
|
2008 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
300,000 |
|
Timothy T. Baker, |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
425,000 |
|
$ |
166,250 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
18,814 |
|
$ |
610,064 |
Executive Vice President -
Store |
|
2008 |
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
- |
|
|
291,160 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
29,590 |
|
|
745,750 |
Operations |
|
2007 |
|
|
424,135 |
|
|
- |
|
|
353,040 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
53,996 |
|
|
831,171 |
|
W. Kerry Jackson, |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
400,000 |
|
$ |
191,250 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
36,489 |
|
$ |
627,739 |
Executive Vice President - Chief
Financial |
|
2008 |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
- |
|
|
341,160 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
47,582 |
|
|
788,742 |
Officer and Treasurer |
|
2007 |
|
|
371,539 |
|
|
- |
|
|
353,040 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
44,722 |
|
|
769,301 |
|
Clifton E. Sifford, |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
425,000 |
|
$ |
191,250 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
44,685 |
|
$ |
660,935 |
Executive Vice President -
General |
|
2008 |
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
- |
|
|
341,160 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
56,052 |
|
|
822,212 |
Merchandise
Manager |
|
2007 |
|
|
424,135 |
|
|
- |
|
|
353,040 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
53,019 |
|
|
830,194 |
(1) |
|
Our fiscal year is a 52/53 week year ending on the Saturday closest
to January 31. Fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007 were each 52-week
years. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents discretionary cash bonuses earned during the fiscal year
indicated and paid in the subsequent fiscal year. See "Compensation
Discussion and Analysis - Determination of Compensation Amounts - Annual
Cash Incentives" for a description of these discretionary
bonuses. |
|
(3) |
|
Amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of
service-based and performance-based restricted stock awards computed in
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards
Codification Topic 718 ("ASC 718"). The grant date fair value of any
performance-based award was computed based on the target level of
performance being achieved, which was the level of performance that was
deemed probable on the grant date. No stock awards were granted in fiscal
2009. |
|
|
|
Disclosure of the relevant assumptions related to the valuation of
awards is provided in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
as contained in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended January 30, 2010. |
|
(4) |
|
Our 2006 Executive incentive Compensation Plan was suspended for
fiscal 2009. Operating income for fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007 did not
exceed that which we achieved in the prior fiscal year. Therefore, no
non-equity incentive plan compensation was earned in fiscal 2008 or fiscal
2007 under our 2006 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan. For a further
discussion of our 2006 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, see
"Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Determination of Compensation
Amounts – Annual Cash Incentives". |
|
(5) |
|
We provide Executives with health and welfare programs, a 401(k)
retirement plan, and employee benefit plans, programs and arrangements
generally available to all employees. We also provide Executives with
other executive benefit programs and perquisites. In fiscal 2009, no
Executive received an individual perquisite in excess of $25,000.
Perquisites and personal benefits received by the Executives in fiscal
2009 included: |
|
|
- Reimbursements under
our Executive medical plan;
- The cost of the
Executive’s leased automobile; and
- The cost of the
Executive’s country club membership.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts
in this column for fiscal 2009 also include matching contributions made by
us under our 401(k) and deferred compensation plans, the discount on the
Executive’s purchases under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP") and
premiums on the Executive’s life and long-term disability insurance. These
amounts are detailed in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disability |
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
Discount under |
|
Life Insurance |
|
Insurance |
|
|
401(k)
Match |
|
Plan
Match |
|
the
ESPP |
|
Premiums |
|
Premiums |
Mark L. Lemond |
|
$ |
4,823 |
|
$ |
25,242 |
|
$ |
882 |
|
$ |
594 |
|
$ |
1,000 |
J. Wayne Weaver |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
Timothy T. Baker |
|
$ |
4,762 |
|
$ |
1,352 |
|
$ |
882 |
|
$ |
594 |
|
$ |
1,000 |
W. Kerry Jackson |
|
$ |
4,935 |
|
$ |
16,981 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
594 |
|
$ |
1,062 |
Clifton E. Sifford |
|
$ |
4,770 |
|
$ |
17,000 |
|
$ |
882 |
|
$ |
594 |
|
$ |
1,000 |
- 17 -
Grants of Plan-Based
Awards
There were no
non-equity or equity grants of plan-based awards made during fiscal 2009 to any
Executive.
Equity Based Compensation – Narrative
Discussion
Our Board and
shareholders approved the 1993 Stock Option Plan, effective January 15, 1993,
and amended it at our 1997 annual meeting of shareholders. The 1993 Stock Option
Plan reserved 1,500,000 shares of our common stock for stock option grants
(subject to adjustment for subsequent stock splits, stock dividends and certain
other changes in the common stock). On January 14, 2003, the 1993 Stock Option
Plan expired. Previously issued stock options can be exercised for up to 10
years from their date of grant.
Our Board and
shareholders approved the 2000 Stock Option Plan, effective June 8, 2000. The
2000 Stock Option Plan initially reserved 1,000,000 shares of our common stock
for stock option and restricted stock grants, but on June 11, 2004, the 2000
Stock Option Plan was amended to increase the number of shares reserved for
issuance to 1,500,000 (subject to adjustment for subsequent stock splits, stock
dividends and certain other changes in the common stock). On June 14, 2005, the
2000 Stock Option Plan was amended to include our non-employee directors as
individuals eligible to receive awards; to stipulate that the exercise price of
all options granted may not be less than the fair market value of our common
stock on the date that the option is granted; and to delete the provision
permitting loans to participants. On June 12, 2008, the 2000 Stock Option Plan
was further amended to increase the number of shares of our common stock
reserved for issuance from 1,500,000 to 2,000,000 and extended the term of the
plan until the later of ten years from the date of adoption of the plan by our
shareholders or the approval of any amendment of the plan by our shareholders.
On October 8, 2008, the Board adopted and approved an amendment to the 2000
Stock Option Plan to modify the change in control provisions and to provide that
upon a change in control, any shares of restricted stock, including restricted
stock intended to qualify as "performance-based compensation" under Section
162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, will become fully vested in the
participants.
The Compensation
Committee administers and grants incentive awards under the 2000 Stock Option
Plan. The 2000 Stock Option Plan provides for the grant to our officers, other
key employees, and non-employee directors of incentive awards in the form of
stock options or restricted stock. Stock options granted under the plan may be
either options intended to qualify for federal income tax purposes as "incentive
stock options" or options not qualifying for favorable tax treatment
("nonqualified stock options").
- 18 -
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal
Year-End
The following table
sets forth information with respect to the outstanding equity awards for each
Executive at the most recent fiscal year ended January 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
Awards: |
|
Equity Incentive |
|
|
|
|
Number
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of |
|
Plan Awards: |
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of |
|
|
|
|
Unearned |
|
Market or Payout |
|
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
or Units |
|
Market Value of |
|
Shares,
Units or |
|
Value of Unearned |
|
|
|
|
Unexercised |
|
|
|
|
Option |
|
of
Stock That |
|
Shares or Units of |
|
Other
Rights |
|
Shares, Units or |
|
|
Grant |
|
Options
- |
|
Option |
|
Expiration |
|
Have
Not |
|
Stock That Have Not |
|
That
Have Not |
|
Other Rights That |
Name |
|
Date |
|
Exercisable |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Date |
|
Vested (1) |
|
Vested
(2) |
|
Vested (3) |
|
Have Not Vested
(2) |
Mark L.
Lemond |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/13/2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
$ |
91,350 |
|
|
3/13/2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
$ |
365,400 |
|
|
3/18/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
$ |
292,320 |
|
|
12/11/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,667 |
|
$ |
304,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/4/2002 |
|
75,000 |
|
$ |
17.12 |
|
4/3/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/12/2003 |
|
75,000 |
|
$ |
12.67 |
|
3/11/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Wayne
Weaver |
|
|
|
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
$ |
- |
Timothy T. Baker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/13/2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,667 |
|
$ |
48,726 |
|
|
3/13/2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
$ |
219,240 |
|
|
3/18/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
$ |
146,160 |
|
|
12/11/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
$ |
219,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/4/2002 |
|
20,000 |
|
$ |
17.12 |
|
4/3/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/12/2003 |
|
8,333 |
|
$ |
12.67 |
|
3/11/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Kerry Jackson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/13/2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,667 |
|
$ |
48,726 |
|
|
3/13/2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
$ |
219,240 |
|
|
3/18/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
$ |
219,240 |
|
|
12/11/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
$ |
219,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/4/2002 |
|
15,000 |
|
$ |
17.12 |
|
4/3/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/12/2003 |
|
15,000 |
|
$ |
12.67 |
|
3/11/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/25/2004 |
|
10,000 |
|
$ |
12.14 |
|
8/24/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clifton E. Sifford |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/13/2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,667 |
|
$ |
48,726 |
|
|
3/13/2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
$ |
219,240 |
|
|
3/18/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
$ |
219,240 |
|
|
12/11/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
$ |
219,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/4/2002 |
|
20,000 |
|
$ |
17.12 |
|
4/3/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/12/2003 |
|
20,000 |
|
$ |
12.67 |
|
3/11/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On December 11, 2008, 194,000 shares of service-based restricted
stock were awarded under the 2000 Stock Option Plan and of these
restricted shares, 79,000 were awarded to the Executives and the balance
was awarded to other key employees. One-third of the shares vested on
January 1, 2010. This vesting included 8,333 of the 25,000 shares held by
Mr. Lemond and 6,000 of the 18,000 shares held individually by Messrs.
Baker, Jackson and Sifford. An additional one-third will vest on January
1, 2011 and January 1, 2012. |
|
(2) |
|
The value of the shares that have not vested was computed utilizing
$18.27, the closing price of our common stock on Friday, January 29,
2010. |
|
(3) |
|
On March 13, 2006, 55,250 shares of restricted stock were awarded
under the 2000 Stock Option Plan and of these restricted shares, 19,500
were awarded to the Executives and the balance was awarded to other key
employees. One-third of these restricted shares vest upon the achievement
of each of three different levels of annual earnings per diluted share.
Annual earnings per share achieved for fiscal 2006 resulted in the vesting
of one-third of the shares on March 31, 2007. This vesting included 2,500
of the 7,500 shares held by Mr. Lemond and 1,333 of the 4,000 shares held
individually by Messrs. Baker, Jackson and Sifford. The remaining annual
earnings per share targets were not achieved during fiscal 2009, therefore
no shares vested on March 31, 2010. Any restricted shares that are
unvested after six years will be forfeited and returned to
us. |
|
|
|
On March 13, 2007, 98,000 shares of restricted stock were awarded
under the 2000 Stock Option Plan and of these restricted shares, 56,000
were awarded to the Executives and the balance was awarded to other key
employees. One-third of these restricted shares vest upon the achievement
of each of three different levels of annual earnings per diluted share.
None of the annual earnings per share targets were achieved during fiscal
2009, therefore no shares vested on March 31, 2010. Any restricted shares
that are unvested after six years will be forfeited and returned to
us. |
|
|
|
On March 18, 2008, 120,000 shares of restricted stock were awarded
under the 2000 Stock Option Plan and of these restricted shares, 48,000
were awarded to the Executives and the balance was awarded to other key
employees. One-third of these restricted shares vest upon the achievement
of each of three different levels of annual earnings per diluted share.
Annual earnings per share achieved for fiscal 2009 resulted in the vesting
of one-third of the shares on March 31, 2010. This vesting included 5,333
of the 16,000 shares held by Mr. Lemond, 2,666 of the 8,000 held by Mr.
Baker and 4,000 of the 12,000 shares held individually by Messrs. Jackson
and Sifford that are still included in this column. Any restricted shares
that are unvested after six years will be forfeited and returned to
us. |
- 19 -
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in
Fiscal 2009
The following table
sets forth for each Executive information with respect to the value realized
upon the exercise of options or the vesting of stock during the fiscal year
ended January 30, 2010.
|
|
Option Awards |
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
Number
of |
|
|
|
|
Number
of |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired on |
|
Value Realized |
|
Acquired on |
|
Value Realized |
Name |
|
Exercise |
|
on
Exercise |
|
Vesting |
|
on Vesting
(1) |
Mark L. Lemond |
|
50,000 |
|
$ |
666,690 |
|
8,333 |
|
$ |
170,577 |
J. Wayne Weaver |
|
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
- |
|
$ |
- |
Timothy T. Baker |
|
18,379 |
|
$ |
131,778 |
|
6,000 |
|
$ |
122,820 |
W. Kerry Jackson |
|
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
6,000 |
|
$ |
122,820 |
Clifton E.
Sifford |
|
10,000 |
|
$ |
92,484 |
|
6,000 |
|
$ |
122,820 |
(1) |
|
Amounts are calculated by multiplying the number of shares vesting
by $20.47, the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2009, the
trading date closest to the vesting date of January 1,
2010. |
Equity Compensation Plan
Information
The following table
sets forth information regarding outstanding grants and shares available for
grant under our existing equity compensation plans, including our 1993 Stock
Option Plan, 2000 Stock Option Plan, Outside Directors Stock Option Plan and the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. All information is as of January 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
Securities |
|
Number
of Securities |
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available |
|
To be
Issued Upon |
|
Weighted Average |
|
for Future Issuance |
|
Exercise of Outstanding |
|
Exercise Price of |
|
(Excluding Securities |
|
Options, Warrants and |
|
Outstanding Options, |
|
Reflected in the |
Plan Category |
Rights |
|
Warrants and
Rights |
|
First
Column) |
Equity compensation plans approved
by security |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
holders (1) |
383,632 |
|
$ |
15.08 |
|
660,002 |
(2) |
Equity compensation plans not
approved by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
security holders (3) |
10,000 |
|
$ |
13.66 |
|
11,000 |
|
|
Total |
393,632 |
|
$ |
14.28 |
|
671,002 |
|
(1) |
|
Includes the 1993 Stock Option Plan, 2000 Stock Option Plan and the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 545,300 shares available for future issuance as stock
options or restricted stock under the 2000 Stock Option Plan and 114,702
shares available for future issuance under the Employee Stock Purchase
Plan. No additional grants will be made from the 1993 Stock Option
Plan. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents our Outside Directors Stock Option Plan, which has been
approved by our Board but was not required to be approved by our
shareholders. The plan called for each non-employee director to be granted
on April 1 of each year an option to purchase 1,000 shares of our common
stock at the market value on the date of the grant. The options vest six
months from the date of grant and expire ten years from the date of grant.
No grants have been made since fiscal 2004 under this plan, and it is
currently the intention of the Board not to grant stock options under this
plan in the future. |
- 20 -
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
The following table
sets forth for each Executive information on the nonqualified deferred
compensation plan with respect to deferrals, our match, earnings/(loss) and
distributions made during fiscal 2009 along with the ending account balance at
January 30, 2010.
|
Executive |
|
Registrant |
|
Aggregate
Earnings |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
Contributions in Last |
|
Contributions in Last |
|
(Loss) in Last Fiscal |
|
Withdrawals and |
|
Aggregate Balance at |
|
Fiscal Year
(1) |
|
Fiscal Year
(2) |
|
Year (3) |
|
Distributions |
|
Last Fiscal Year
End |
Mark L. Lemond |
$ |
53,846 |
|
$ |
25,242 |
|
$ |
61,358 |
|
|
$ |
48,153 |
|
$ |
600,517 |
J. Wayne Weaver |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
Timothy T. Baker |
$ |
3,848 |
|
$ |
1,352 |
|
$ |
65,726 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
352,372 |
W. Kerry Jackson |
$ |
33,962 |
|
$ |
16,981 |
|
$ |
(7,883 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
280,514 |
Clifton E.
Sifford |
$ |
50,000 |
|
$ |
17,000 |
|
$ |
5,162 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
479,127 |
(1) |
|
The amounts are included in the Salary column in the Summary
Compensation Table for fiscal 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts are included in the All Other Compensation column in
the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
The amounts shown in this column are not reported as compensation
in the Summary Compensation Table, as they do not represent above-market
or preferential earnings on deferred
compensation. |
Non-Equity Based Compensation – Narrative
Discussion
The Pension
Benefits Table has been excluded, as we do not have a defined benefit plan. On
February 24, 1994, our Board approved the Shoe Carnival Retirement Savings Plan.
The primary savings mechanism is a 401(k) plan. Further information regarding
the Shoe Carnival Retirement Savings Plan can be found in Note 8 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010.
In fiscal 2000, we
established a nonqualified deferred compensation plan for certain highly
compensated employees who,
due to Internal Revenue Service limitations, cannot defer an adequate level of
replacement income for their retirement planning.
Features of the
plan include:
- Participants elect on a
calendar year basis to defer, on a pre-tax basis, portions of their current
base salary and bonus until retirement, or earlier if so elected, up to a
maximum of $100,000 per calendar year.
- The compensation deferred
under this plan is credited with earnings or losses on a daily basis and
measured by the mirrored rate of return on investments elected by plan
participants similar to those available under our 401(k) plan. These services
are provided by a third-party provider.
- While not required to, we can
match a portion of the participant’s contributions, which are then subject to
immediate, one or two year vesting requirements depending on the length of
service of the participant.
- Benefits are paid out upon
death, disability, retirement, financial hardship or termination of employment
based on each participant’s pre-selected payout schedule.
- Designated future in-service
distributions may be taken two years after the year of deferral and must be
requested at a minimum of two years in advance. The amount of the distribution
is restricted to the maximum of the actual deferral amount and vested employer
match if elected for the specific year, adjusted by any investment gain or
loss.
- The plan is currently
unfunded.
- 21 -
Termination and Change-in-Control
Arrangements
Mark L. Lemond
On December 11,
2008, we entered into an Amended and Restated Employment and Noncompetition
Agreement (the "Agreement") with Mark L. Lemond. The Agreement amended and
restated a similar agreement entered into with Mr. Lemond as of December 31,
2006. The term of the Agreement is through January 31, 2011. The term of the
Agreement will be automatically extended one year on each February 1st beginning February 1, 2009, unless
either party gives written notification not more than 90 and not less than 30
days prior to February 1, in which case the Agreement will terminate three years
after such February 1st (such term, including any extension is
referred to as the "Term"). No such notification was given by either party prior
to February 1, 2010.
The Agreement
provides for an annual base salary equivalent to Mr. Lemond’s salary for fiscal
2008, subject to increase by the Compensation Committee. Mr. Lemond is entitled
to participate in our 2006 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, and in any
successor plan adopted by us from time to time. Mr. Lemond is also entitled to
participate in any and all welfare and health benefit plans and other employee
benefit plans. Under the Agreement, employment will terminate upon Mr. Lemond's
death, and may be terminated by us upon Mr. Lemond's disability, or by us for
cause or without cause. Mr. Lemond may terminate employment with good reason,
without good reason or by voluntary retirement. Under the Agreement, "cause" is
defined as any one or more of the following actions by Mr. Lemond:
- conviction for a felony or
other crime involving moral turpitude;
- engaging in illegal conduct
or gross misconduct which is injurious to us;
- engaging in any fraudulent or
dishonest conduct in his dealings with, or on behalf of, us;
- failure or refusal to follow
the lawful and reasonable instructions of our Chairman of the Board or the
Board if such failure or refusal continues for a period of 10 days after we
deliver to Mr. Lemond a written notice stating the instructions which Mr.
Lemond has failed or refused to follow;
- material breach of any of his
obligations under the Agreement;
- material breach of our
policies;
- use of alcohol or drugs which
substantially interferes with the performance of his duties for us or which
compromises our integrity or reputation; or
- engaging in any conduct,
which as a result of such conduct, our integrity or reputation is
substantially compromised.
In addition, "good
reason" is defined as (i) a material diminution in Mr. Lemond's base
compensation; (ii) a material diminution in Mr. Lemond's authority, duties, or
responsibilities; (iii) a material diminution in the budget over which Mr.
Lemond retains authority; (iv) a material change in the geographic location at
which Mr. Lemond must perform services; or (v) any other action or inaction that
constitutes a material breach by us of the Agreement.
- 22 -
The following table sets
forth the estimated payout Mr. Lemond would receive from us under each of the
specific triggering events and assumes that the triggering event took place on
January 30, 2010, the last day of our most recently completed fiscal
year.
|
Death, |
|
Without Cause
or |
|
For Cause or
by |
|
|
|
|
Retirement or |
|
by Employee for |
|
Employee Without |
|
Change-in- |
Description of
Payout and/or Accelerated Vesting |
Disability |
|
Good
Reason |
|
Good
Reason |
|
Control
(1) |
Bonus for year of separation
(2) |
$ |
492,500 |
|
$ |
492,500 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
492,500 |
Cash severance (3) |
|
- |
|
|
3,587,900 |
|
|
- |
|
|
3,587,900 |
Medical and dental benefits
(4) |
|
- |
|
|
52,400 |
|
|
- |
|
|
52,400 |
Restricted stock, accelerated vesting (5) (6) |
|
- |
|
|
304,500 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,053,600 |
Gross up on excise tax
(7) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,226,800 |
Excise tax
(7) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
806,000 |
Total |
$ |
492,500 |
|
$ |
4,437,300 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
7,219,200 |
(1) |
|
The Agreement does not contain a specific change-in-control
provision for Mr. Lemond. However, the Agreement does contain an
assignment clause which requires any successor company to assume and agree
to perform the Agreement in the same manner and to the same extent that we
would be required to perform it if no such succession had taken place.
Therefore, upon a change-in-control of the Company, the terms of the
triggering events would still apply upon Mr. Lemond’s termination from the
Company. This example assumes both a change-in-control of the Company and
termination of Mr. Lemond without cause or by him for good reason as of
January 30, 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
The bonus for year of separation would be paid in a lump sum within
15 days of termination in an amount equal to 70% of his current base
salary for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs, multiplied by
a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days elapsed in such
fiscal year through the termination date and the denominator of which is
365. In this table, the annual base salary is equivalent to Mr. Lemond’s
base salary for fiscal 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
The cash severance would be paid in a lump sum within 15 days of
termination in an amount equal to three times 170% of his current base
salary for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs. In this table,
the annual base salary is equivalent to Mr. Lemond’s base salary for
fiscal 2009. |
|
(4) |
|
Upon a termination without cause or by Mr. Lemond for good reason,
Mr. Lemond would qualify for medical and dental benefits for 36 months
after the calendar month in which the termination occurs or until Mr.
Lemond is re-employed and is covered under that employer’s medical benefit
plan. The table assumes three years of estimated benefits. |
|
(5) |
|
Upon termination by us without cause or by Mr. Lemond for good
reason, the Agreement states that all shares of restricted stock granted
to Mr. Lemond after December 31, 2006 which are not intended to qualify as
“performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code shall contain provisions which shall provide for immediate
vesting of the restricted stock. In this example, the value was calculated
by multiplying $18.27, the closing price of our common stock on January
29, 2010, by the number of "non-performance based" unvested shares of
restricted stock held by Mr. Lemond on January 30, 2010. |
|
(6) |
|
The 2000 Stock Option Plan under which our restricted stock was
issued includes a change-in-control provision providing for the immediate
vesting of any currently unvested shares of restricted stock, including
restricted stock intended to qualify as "performance-based compensation"
under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. In this example, the
value was calculated by multiplying $18.27, the closing price of our
common stock on January 29, 2010, by the number of unvested shares of
restricted stock held by Mr. Lemond on January 30, 2010. |
|
(7) |
|
If any payment under the Agreement would be subject to the excise
tax under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, Mr. Lemond would be
entitled to receive additional compensation from us to cover the excise
taxes, interest and penalties (if applicable) and other taxes arising from
the additional compensation. In this example, under the
"Change-in-Control" triggering event, Mr. Lemond would have qualified to
receive additional compensation from us to cover excise taxes at January
30, 2010. The taxes have been computed in accordance with Section 280G of
the Internal Revenue Code. |
Other factors
material to the Agreement include the following:
- The benefits granted to Mr.
Lemond under the Agreement are subject to certain employment and
post-employment conditions. This includes, but is not limited to, Mr. Lemond’s
agreement not to contribute his knowledge and abilities to any business or
entity in competition with us for a period of two years following the
termination of his employment.
- Notwithstanding any other
provision of the Agreement, upon termination of Mr. Lemond’s employment for
any reason, he shall be entitled to receive all accrued but unpaid
compensation, bonuses and benefits under all of our compensation, bonus and
benefit plans in which he is a participant, all in accordance with the terms
of such plans. These plans include, without limitation, our 401(k) plan,
deferred compensation plan and bonus plans which are earned in a fiscal year,
but paid in the following year.
- In the event we terminate Mr.
Lemond without cause or he terminates with good reason, any outstanding stock
options issued to Mr. Lemond will be exercisable during the remainder of the
term of the stock option. Stock options held by Mr. Lemond at January 30, 2010
are set forth in the "Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End" table on
page 19.
- 23 -
Timothy Baker, Kerry Jackson and Clifton
Sifford
On December 11,
2008, we entered into Amended and Restated Employment and Noncompetition
Agreements (the "Agreements") with Timothy Baker, Kerry Jackson and Clifton
Sifford. The Agreements amended and restated similar agreements entered into
with these individuals as of December 31, 2006. The terms of the Agreements are
through January 31, 2009 (such terms, including any extension are referred to as
the "Terms"). The Agreements are subject to early termination as provided in the
Agreements. The Agreements shall be renewed automatically for successive terms
of one year each unless either party provides written notice of non-renewal to
the other party not more than 90 days and not less than 30 days before the end
of the then current Term. No such notification was given by any party prior to
February 1, 2010.
The Agreements
provide for an annual base salary equivalent to each such Executive’s salary for
fiscal 2008, subject to adjustment by the Compensation Committee. Messrs. Baker,
Jackson and Sifford are each entitled to participate in our 2006 Executive
Incentive Compensation Plan, and in any successor plan adopted by us from time
to time. Such Executives are also entitled to participate in any and all welfare
and health benefit plans and other employee benefit plans. Under each of the
Agreements, employment will terminate upon death, and may be terminated by us
upon the disability of such Executive, or by us for cause or without cause. Each
such Executive may terminate employment voluntarily or with good
reason.
Under the
Agreements, "cause" is defined as any one or more of the following actions by
the respective Executive:
- conviction for a felony or
other crime involving moral turpitude;
- engaging in illegal conduct
or gross misconduct which is injurious to us;
- engaging in any fraudulent or
dishonest conduct in their dealings with, or on behalf of,
us;
- failure or refusal to follow
the lawful and reasonable instructions of our Chief Executive Officer,
President, or other executive officer to whom each Executive reports, if such
failure or refusal continues for a period of 10 days after we deliver to such
Executive a written notice stating the instructions which such Executive has
failed or refused to follow;
- material breach of any of his
obligations under the Agreement;
- material breach of our
policies;
- use of alcohol or drugs which
interferes with the performance of his duties for us or which compromises our
integrity or reputation; or
- engaging in any conduct
tending to bring us into public disgrace or disrepute.
In addition, "good
reason" is defined as the occurrence, without the Executive's written consent,
of a material reduction by us in the Executive's base salary.
The following
tables set forth the estimated payout each such Executive would receive from us
under each of the specific triggering events and assumes that the triggering
event took place on January 30, 2010, the last day of our most recently
completed fiscal year.
Timothy Baker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualifying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination |
|
|
|
|
Without Cause or |
|
For Cause or by |
|
Following a |
|
Death or |
|
by Employee for |
|
Employee Without |
|
Change-in- |
Description of
Payout and/or Accelerated Vesting |
Disability |
|
Good
Reason |
|
Good
Reason |
|
Control |
Bonus for year of separation
(1) |
$ |
- |
|
$
|
233,800 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$
|
- |
Cash severance (2) |
|
- |
|
|
637,500 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,317,500 |
Out-placement services
(3) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,500 |
Medical and dental benefits (4) |
|
- |
|
|
26,200 |
|
|
- |
|
|
26,200 |
Restricted stock, accelerated
vesting (5) (6) |
|
- |
|
|
219,240 |
|
|
- |
|
|
633,400 |
Gross up on excise tax (7) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
429,200 |
Excise tax
(7) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
282,000 |
Total |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
1,116,740 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
2,690,800 |
- 24 -
Kerry Jackson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualifying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination |
|
|
|
|
|
Without Cause or |
|
For Cause or by |
|
Following a |
|
|
Death or |
|
by Employee for |
|
Employee Without |
|
Change-in- |
Description of
Payout and/or Accelerated Vesting |
|
Disability |
|
Good
Reason |
|
Good
Reason |
|
Control |
Bonus for year of separation
(1) |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
220,000 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
Cash severance (2) |
|
|
- |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,240,000 |
Out-placement services
(3) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,500 |
Medical and dental benefits (4) |
|
|
- |
|
|
26,200 |
|
|
- |
|
|
26,200 |
Restricted stock, accelerated
vesting (5) (6) |
|
|
- |
|
|
219,240 |
|
|
- |
|
|
706,400 |
Gross up on excise tax (7) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
467,100 |
Excise tax
(7) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
306,900 |
Total |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
1,065,440 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$
|
2,749,100 |
|
Clifton Sifford |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualifying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination |
|
|
|
|
|
Without Cause or |
|
For Cause or by |
|
Following a |
|
|
Death or |
|
by Employee for |
|
Employee Without |
|
Change-in- |
Description of
Payout and/or Accelerated Vesting |
|
Disability |
|
Good
Reason |
|
Good
Reason |
|
Control |
Bonus for year of separation
(1) |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
233,800 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
Cash severance (2) |
|
|
- |
|
|
637,500 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,317,500 |
Out-placement services
(3) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,500 |
Medical and dental benefits (4) |
|
|
- |
|
|
26,200 |
|
|
- |
|
|
26,200 |
Restricted stock, accelerated
vesting (5) (6) |
|
|
- |
|
|
219,240 |
|
|
- |
|
|
706,400 |
Gross up on excise tax (7) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
445,779 |
Excise tax
(7) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
292,877 |
Total |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
1,116,740 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
2,791,256 |
(1) |
|
The bonus
for year of separation would be paid in a lump sum within 30 days of
termination in an amount equal to 55% of each Executive's current base
salary for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs, multiplied by
a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days elapsed in such
fiscal year through the termination date and the denominator of which is
365. In this table, the annual base salary is equivalent to the
Executive's base salary for fiscal 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
The cash
severance for termination without cause or by employee for good reason
would be paid in a lump sum within 30 days of termination in an amount
equal to 150% of each Executive’s current base salary for the fiscal year
in which the termination occurs. Upon a change-in-control, a lump sum cash
severance would be paid within 30 days of termination in an amount equal
to 310% of each Executive’s current base salary for the fiscal year in
which the termination occurs. In this table, the annual base salary is
equivalent to the Executive's base salary for fiscal 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
We will
provide out-placement services at a cost not to exceed $2,500 in the event
of a change-in-control. |
|
(4) |
|
Upon a
termination without cause, by employee for good reason or a
change-in-control, each Executive would be paid in a lump sum within 30
days of termination an amount equal to 18 times (i) the COBRA premium rate
plus (ii) any additional state and federal taxes such Executive will incur
as a result of the lump sum payment. |
|
(5) |
|
Upon
termination by us without cause or by the Executive for good reason, the
Agreement states that all shares of restricted stock granted to the
Executives after December 31, 2006 which are not intended to qualify as
“performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code shall contain provisions which shall provide for immediate
vesting of the restricted stock. In this example, the value was calculated
by multiplying $18.27, the closing price of our common stock on January
29, 2010, by the number of "non-performance based" unvested shares of
restricted stock held by each Executive on January 30, 2010. |
|
(6) |
|
The 2000
Stock Option Plan, under which our restricted stock was issued, includes a
change-in-control provision providing for the immediate vesting of any
currently unvested shares of restricted stock, including restricted stock
intended to qualify as "performance-based compensation" under Section
162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. In this example, the value was
calculated by multiplying $18.27, the closing price of our common stock on
January 29, 2010, by the number of unvested shares of restricted stock
held by each Executive on January 30, 2010. |
|
(7) |
|
If any
payment under the Agreement would be subject to the excise tax under
Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, each Executive would be
entitled to receive additional compensation from us to cover the excise
taxes, interest and penalties (if applicable) and other taxes arising from
the additional compensation. In this example, each Executive would have
qualified to receive additional compensation from us to cover excise taxes
at January 30, 2010. The taxes have been computed in accordance with
Section 280G of the Internal Revenue
Code. |
Other factors
material to the Agreements are as follows:
- The benefits granted to each
Executive under the Agreements are subject to certain employment and
post-employment conditions. This includes, but is not limited to, the
agreement by each Executive not to contribute his knowledge and abilities to
any business or entity in competition with us for a period of one year
following termination of the Executive’s employment.
- 25
-
- Notwithstanding any other
provision of the Agreements, upon termination of employment for any reason,
the Executive shall be entitled to receive all base salary earned but unpaid
and all other payments and benefits accrued before the termination
date.
- In the event we terminate any
of the three Executives without cause or they terminate for good reason, any
stock options issued after December 31, 2006 that would have vested within 12
months of termination would immediately vest. Under the same conditions but
within two years of a change-in-control, all stock options issued to each
Executive would be exercisable within 90 days of termination. Stock options
held by the Executives at January 30, 2010 are set forth in the "Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End" table on page 19.
J. Wayne Weaver
On January 15,
1993, we entered into a noncompetition agreement with J. Wayne Weaver. As long
as Mr. Weaver is our executive officer or director, he may not engage directly
or indirectly through any other company or entity in the retail shoe business
without the prior approval of our Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has
approved Mr. Weaver's association with LC Footwear, LLC and PL Footwear, Inc.
Effective February 1, 1993, Mr. Weaver became our employee at an annual salary
of $300,000. Although Mr. Weaver will continue to be involved in other business
activities and will not devote his full time to the Company, he will devote such
time to the Company as he deems necessary or appropriate to perform his duties
as Chairman of the Board.
Compensation of Non-Employee
Directors
The following table
sets forth information with respect to non-employee director compensation paid
during the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010. The compensation paid during the
fiscal year ended January 30, 2010 to J. Wayne Weaver and Mark L. Lemond is
included in the Summary Compensation Table on page 17.
|
|
Fees
Earned or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
(1) |
|
Paid in
Cash |
|
Stock
Awards (2) |
|
Total |
William E. Bindley |
|
$ |
31,250 |
|
$ |
17,507 |
|
$
|
48,757 |
Kent A. Kleeberger |
|
$ |
33,750 |
|
$ |
17,507 |
|
$ |
51,257 |
Gerald W.
Schoor |
|
$ |
33,250 |
|
$ |
17,507 |
|
$ |
50,757 |
(1) |
|
Information
on our non-employee directors can be found in "Proposal No. 1 Election of
a Director - Nominee and Director Information" on page 4 as well as in
"Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Committees" beginning on
page 6. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts
reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock awards
computed in accordance with ASC 718. Disclosure of the relevant
assumptions related to the valuation of awards is provided in the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements as contained in Part II, Item 8 of
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 30,
2010. |
The annual retainer
for each non-employee director is $20,000. In addition to the annual retainer,
the Chairman of the Audit Committee receives additional annual compensation of
$7,500, while the Chairman of the Compensation Committee and the Chairman of the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee each receive $5,000 and the Lead
Director receives additional annual compensation of $2,000. Other fees payable
include a fee of $1,000 for each meeting of the Board with accompanying
Committee meetings attended and a fee of $1,000 for each Committee meeting in
which the full Board does not meet or $750 if attendance is by conference call.
All directors receive reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
incurred in connection with meetings of the Board. Non-employee directors will
annually receive restricted shares valued at $17,500 as of the date of grant
under the 2000 Stock Option Plan. The restrictions on the shares lapse on
January 2nd of the
year following the year in which the grant was made. No director who is our
officer or employee receives compensation for services rendered as a director.
During 2009, the Board met four times.
- 26
-
On March 4, 1999,
the Board approved the Outside Directors Stock Option Plan. The plan reserves
for issuance 25,000 shares of our common stock (subject to adjustment for stock
splits, stock dividends and certain other changes to the common stock). No
grants have been made under this plan since fiscal 2004 and it is currently the
intention of the Board not to grant stock options under this plan in the future.
As of January 30, 2010, each non-employee director held shares issuable upon the
exercise of presently exercisable options granted under the Outside Directors
Stock Option Plan. Mr. Bindley held 5,000 options, Mr. Schoor held 4,000 options
and Mr. Kleeberger held 1,000 options under this plan.
The Board adopted,
and the shareholders approved on June 14, 2005, amendments to the 2000 Stock
Option Plan to allow non-employee directors to participate. Each non-employee
director was awarded 1,428 shares of restricted stock under the 2000 Stock
Option Plan on June 9, 2009, with a grant date fair value of $17,507 based on
the closing market price of our common stock on that day. The restrictions on
these shares lapsed on January 2, 2010. At January 30, 2010, no additional
shares of restricted stock were held by any of the non-employee
directors.
- 27
-
PROPOSAL NO. 2
RATIFICATION OF OUR INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The ratification of
the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP ("Deloitte") as our independent
registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2010 is recommended by the Audit
Committee and will be submitted to a vote at the meeting in order to permit our
shareholders to express their approval or disapproval. In the event of a
negative vote, a selection of another independent registered public accounting
firm will be made by the Audit Committee. A representative of Deloitte is
expected to be present at the meeting, will be given an opportunity to make a
statement if desired and will respond to appropriate questions. Notwithstanding
approval by our shareholders, the Audit Committee reserves the right to replace
the independent registered public accounting firm at any time.
The Board and the Audit Committee
recommend a vote FOR the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as
our
independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal
2010.
AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS
Principal Accountant Fees And Services
The following
represents fees for professional audit services rendered by Deloitte for the
audit of our financial statements for fiscal 2009 and 2008 and fees billed for
other services rendered by Deloitte.
|
|
Fiscal Year |
Fee
Category |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Audit fees (1) |
|
$
|
425,100 |
|
$
|
435,180 |
Audit-related fees (2) |
|
$ |
14,390 |
|
$ |
15,000 |
Tax fees |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
All other fees
(3) |
|
$ |
2,140 |
|
$ |
7,200 |
(1) |
|
Audit fees
consist of fees relating to the audit of our annual financial statements
and the reviews of the financial statements filed on Form 10-Q, and fees
for professional services rendered for the audit of the effectiveness of
our internal control over financial reporting. |
|
(2) |
|
Audit-related fees consist of fees related to employee benefit plan
audits. |
|
(3) |
|
All other
fees represent expenses related to consultation provided by Deloitte on
various items. |
Audit Committee Pre-Approval
Policy
The Audit
Committee's policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit
services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. These
services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and
other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any
pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services,
the Audit Committee is informed of each service and the pre-approval is
generally subject to a specific budget. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve
particular services on a case-by-case basis. In addition, the Chairman of the
Audit Committee may act to pre-approve services in interim periods and request
ratification by the full Audit Committee at the next regularly scheduled
committee meeting.
For fiscal 2009,
pre-approved non-audit services included those services described above under
"Audit-related fees" and "All other fees". The aggregate amount of all such
non-audit services constituted approximately 3.7% of the total amount of fees
paid by us to Deloitte.
Report of the Audit
Committee
Management of the
Company is responsible for the financial reporting process, including the system
of internal control over financial reporting, and for the preparation of
consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. The Company's independent registered
public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP ("Deloitte"), is responsible
for performing the audit of the Company's consolidated financial statements and
expressing an opinion on those statements, as well as auditing the effectiveness
of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee
is responsible for oversight of all aspects of the Company's financial
reporting, internal control over financial reporting and audit
processes.
- 28
-
In fulfillment of
its responsibilities, the Audit Committee on a regular basis discusses with both
management and Deloitte the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company's internal
control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed
the audited financial statements with the Company's management and Deloitte. In
addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with Deloitte all matters required
to be discussed with audit committees by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61,
"Communication with Audit Committees" (Codification of Statements on Auditing
Standards, AU 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(“PCAOB”) in Rule 3200T. This discussion involved certain information relating
to Deloitte’s judgments about the quality, not just the acceptability, of the
Company’s accounting principles and included such other matters as are required
to be discussed with the Audit Committee under standards established by the
PCAOB.
The Audit Committee
also has received the written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte required
by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Deloitte’s communications with
the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with Deloitte its
independence from the Company and the Company’s management. In addition, the
Audit Committee considered whether Deloitte’s independence would be jeopardized
by providing non-audit services to the Company.
Based on the Audit
Committee's review and discussions referenced in this report, the Audit
Committee recommended to the Board that the Company's audited financial
statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended January 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Audit
Committee
Kent A. Kleeberger
(Chair)
William E.
Bindley
Gerald W.
Schoor
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED
PERSONS
Conflicts of Interest and Related Person
Transaction Policies
Under our Ethics
Code, our directors, officers and employees are not permitted to conduct
business on our behalf with a member of his or her family, or a business
organization with which he or she or a family member has an interest or
employment relationship that could be considered significant in terms of
potential conflict of interest unless such business dealings have been disclosed
to, and approved by, the Audit Committee (in the case of directors or executive
officers), the Chief Financial Officer (in the case of officers) or the
employee’s Department Vice President (in the case of other
employees).
Further, under our
Audit Committee’s charter, the Audit Committee must review and approve all
related person transactions in which any executive officer, director, director
nominee or more than 5% shareholder, or any of their immediate family members,
has a direct or indirect material interest. The Audit Committee may not approve
a related person transaction unless it is in, or not inconsistent with, our best
interests and, where applicable, the terms of such transaction are at least as
favorable to us as could be obtained from an unrelated party.
Each of the related
person transactions that occurred during fiscal 2009, as described below, were
reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with these
policies.
Current Transactions
Mr. J. Wayne
Weaver, along with Bradley W. Weaver, his son, and collectively the owners of
approximately 27.1% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, are members
of LC Footwear, LLC with Mr. J. Wayne Weaver serving as the managing member.
Both gentlemen were shareholders of PL Footwear, Inc., which during December
2007 became a wholly owned subsidiary of LC Footwear, LLC.
- 29
-
We have
historically made purchases of women's footwear from LC Footwear, LLC in the
ordinary course of business. During fiscal 2009, $8,000 in purchases was made.
Our management believes that purchases from LC Footwear, LLC historically have
been and will continue to be on terms that are not less favorable to us than
could be obtained from unrelated third parties for comparable
merchandise.
PL Footwear, Inc.,
along with others, serves as an import agent for us. Import agents represent us
on a commission basis in dealings with shoe factories primarily in mainland
China where most of our private label shoes are manufactured. As agents for us,
PL Footwear, Inc. and others visit shoe manufacturers, collect shoe samples,
submit these samples to us and advise us of market conditions and availability
of merchandise. They also help select materials, assist in detailing and quality
control and coordinate the production and delivery schedule of a portion of our
private label merchandise. We paid PL Footwear, Inc. 10% of the gross purchase
price of shoes bought through that company. Commissions paid to PL Footwear,
Inc. were approximately $763,000 in fiscal 2009. Our management believes that
the arrangements with PL Footwear, Inc. were on terms that were no less
favorable to us than could be obtained from unrelated third
parties.
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
The following table
sets forth, as of March 16, 2010, certain information with respect to beneficial
ownership of our common stock by each person (or group of affiliated persons)
who is known by management to own beneficially more than 5% of our common stock,
by each Executive, by each non-employee director and by all current directors
and executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise noted, the persons named
in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of
common stock shown as beneficially owned by them.
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
Percent of |
Name |
|
Beneficially Owned
(1) |
|
Class |
J. Wayne Weaver and Delores B.
Weaver (2) |
|
|
3,333,230 |
|
|
25.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark L. Lemond (3) |
|
|
623,436 |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clifton E. Sifford (4) |
|
|
103,897 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Kerry Jackson (5) |
|
|
100,799 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy T. Baker (6) |
|
|
88,926 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerald W. Schoor (7) |
|
|
11,678 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William E. Bindley (8) |
|
|
9,678 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kent A. Kleeberger (9) |
|
|
5,678 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All current executive officers and
directors as a group |
|
|
4,301,249 |
|
|
32.0 |
% |
(9 persons) (10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FMR LLC |
|
|
1,804,631 |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
82 Devonshire Street |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boston, MA 02109**(11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimensional Fund Advisors
LP |
|
|
1,044,555 |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
Palisades West, Building
One |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6300 Bee Cave Road |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Austin, TX
78746**(12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1% |
|
|
|
** |
|
Information is based solely on
reports filed by such shareholder under Section 13(d) or Section 13(g) of
the Exchange Act. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes shares subject to options
that are presently exercisable (i.e., within 60 days after March 16,
2010). |
- 30
-
(2) |
|
J. Wayne and
Delores B. Weaver are husband and wife. Their address is 7500 East
Columbia Street, Evansville, Indiana 47715. Mr. and Mrs. Weaver each
individually own 1,666,615 shares. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes
150,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of presently exercisable
options, 75,667 shares of restricted stock as to which Mr. Lemond has
voting but not dispositive power and 11,500 shares directly owned by Mr.
Lemond's spouse. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes
40,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of presently exercisable options
and 50,667 shares of restricted stock as to which Mr. Sifford has voting
but not dispositive power. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes
40,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of presently exercisable options
and 50,667 shares of restricted stock as to which Mr. Jackson has voting
but not dispositive power. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes
28,333 shares issuable upon the exercise of presently exercisable options
and 46,667 shares of restricted stock as to which Mr. Baker has voting but
not dispositive power. |
|
(7) |
|
Includes
3,000 shares held as co-trustee for the benefit of Mr. Schoor's spouse and
4,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of presently exercisable options
granted under our Outside Directors Stock Option Plan. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes
4,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of presently exercisable options
granted under our Outside Directors Stock Option Plan. |
|
(9) |
|
Includes
1,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of presently exercisable options
granted under our Outside Directors Stock Option Plan. |
|
(10) |
|
Includes
269,833 shares issuable upon the exercise of presently exercisable options
and 239,835 shares of restricted stock as to which the individuals have
voting but not dispositive power. |
|
(11) |
|
The
shareholder is a parent holding company and shares voting and/or
dispositive power in varying amounts over the shares reported as
beneficially owned with the following subsidiaries, individuals and other
entities: Fidelity Management & Research Company (investment advisor),
Edward C. Johnson III (Chairman of the Board of FMR LLC) and Fidelity
Small Cap Stock Fund (investment company). Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund
beneficially owned 5.2% of our common stock. |
|
(12) |
|
Dimensional
Fund Advisors LP is a registered investment advisor and has sole voting
and dispositive power with respect to the shares. All of the indicated
shares are owned by advisory clients of the shareholder, and the
shareholder disclaims beneficial ownership of such
shares. |
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2011 ANNUAL
MEETING
The date by which
shareholder proposals must be received by us for inclusion in proxy materials
relating to the 2010 annual meeting of common shareholders is January 10,
2011.
In order to be
considered at the 2011 annual meeting, shareholder proposals must comply with
the advance notice and eligibility requirements contained in our by-laws. Our
by-laws provide that shareholders are required to give advance notice to us of
any nomination by a shareholder of candidates for election as directors and of
any business to be brought by a shareholder before an annual shareholders'
meeting. Specifically, the by-laws provide that for a shareholder to nominate a
person for election to our Board, the shareholder must be entitled to vote for
the election of directors at the meeting and must give timely written notice of
the nomination to our Secretary. The by-laws also provide that for business to
be properly brought before an annual meeting by a shareholder, the shareholder
must have the legal right and authority to make the proposal for consideration
at the meeting and the shareholder must give timely written notice thereof to
our Secretary. In order to be timely, a shareholder's notice must be delivered
to or mailed and received at our principal executive offices not less than 30
days nor more than 60 days prior to the meeting. In the event that less than 40
days' notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting is given or
made to shareholders, notice by the shareholder must be received not later than
the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which notice of the
date of the meeting was mailed or public disclosure was made. The notice must
contain specified information about each nominee or the proposed business and
the shareholder making the nomination or proposal.
The specific
requirements of these advance notice and eligibility provisions are set forth in
Article II and Article III of our by-laws, a copy of which is available upon
request. Such request and any shareholder proposals should be sent to our
Secretary at our principal executive offices.
- 31
-
SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS
Our Board has
implemented a process whereby shareholders may send communications to the
Board's attention. Any shareholder desiring to communicate with the Board, or
one or more specific members thereof, should communicate in a writing addressed
to Shoe Carnival, Inc., Board, c/o Lead Director, 7500 East Columbia Street,
Evansville, Indiana 47715.
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary set forth in any of our previous filings under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act that may incorporate
future filings (including this proxy statement, in whole or in part), the
Compensation Committee Report and the Report of the Audit Committee shall not be
incorporated by reference in any such filings.
ANNUAL REPORTS
Our Annual Report
to Shareholders for fiscal 2009 accompanies this proxy statement. The Annual
Report is not used as part of this solicitation material and no action will be
taken with respect to it at the annual meeting. Additional copies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including financial
statements but excluding exhibits, may be obtained without charge upon written
request to David A. Kapp, Secretary, Shoe Carnival, Inc., 7500 East Columbia
Street, Evansville, Indiana 47715.
- 32
-
Proxy - Shoe Carnival, Inc.
Proxy Solicited on Behalf of The
Board
For The Annual Meeting of Common Shareholders to
be held on June 16, 2010
The undersigned
appoints Mark L. Lemond and J. Wayne Weaver, and each of them, as proxies, with
full power of substitution and revocation, to vote, as designated on the reverse
side hereof, all the common stock of Shoe Carnival, Inc. which the undersigned
has power to vote, with all powers which the undersigned would possess if
personally present, at the annual meeting of shareholders thereof to be held at
the corporate headquarters for Shoe Carnival, Inc. located at 7500 East Columbia
Street, Evansville, Indiana on Wednesday, June 16, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., C.D.T.,
or at any adjournment thereof.
This proxy when properly executed will be
voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned shareholder. Unless
otherwise marked, this proxy will be voted FOR the election as Director of the
nominee listed under Proposal 1 and FOR Proposal 2.
YOUR VOTE IS
IMPORTANT!
PLEASE VOTE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS
PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
(Continued and to
be signed on reverse side.)
Shoe Carnival, Inc.
Annual Meeting Proxy Card
A. |
|
Proposals – The Board recommends a
vote FOR the listed nominees and
FOR Proposal
2. |
|
1. |
|
Election of a Director: |
|
For |
|
Withhold |
01
– Mark L. Lemond |
[
] |
|
[
] |
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
2. |
|
Proposal to ratify the appointment
of Deloitte & Touche LLP, as the independent registered public
accounting firm for the Company for fiscal 2010. |
|
[
] |
|
[
] |
|
[
] |
Change of Address – Please print new address
below.
C. |
|
Authorized Signatures – This
section must be completed for your vote to be counted. – Date and Sign
Below |
When signing as
attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title.
If more than one trustee, all should sign. All joint owners must sign.
Date (mm/dd/yyyy) – Please print date below. |
|
|
Signature 1 - Please keep signature within the box. |
|
|
Signature 2 - Please keep signature within the box. |
|
|