Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-07680
Voyager Learning Company
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
36-3580106
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1800 Valley View Lane, Suite 400, Dallas, Texas
75234-8923
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(214) 932-9500
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title of each class
common stock, $.001 par value per share
Indicate by check mark if the Company is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the Company is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the registrants voting stock held by non-affiliates (based upon the
per share closing price of $5.45 on June 30, 2008) was approximately $142 million.
The number of shares of the registrants common stock, $.001 par value, outstanding as of January
31, 2009 was 29,874,145.
Documents Incorporated By Reference: None
Part I
Voyager Learning Company
Safe Harbor for Forward-looking Statements.
Except for the historical information and discussions contained herein, statements contained
in this document may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve a number of risks,
uncertainties and other factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially. In some
cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as may, should,
expects, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates, predicts, potential, continue,
projects, intends, prospects, priorities, or the negative of such terms or similar
terminology. These factors may cause our actual results to differ from any forward-looking
statements. We undertake no obligation to update any of our forward-looking statements.
Item 1. Business.
Unless otherwise expressly indicated in this Item 1, the discussions set forth herein are as
of December 31, 2008.
Voyager Learning Company Business Overview
Voyager Learning Company (the Company, we, us, or our) has been a leading publisher of
solutions for the education, automotive and power equipment
markets. We have more than 50 years of experience in information,
content development, and aggregation. Our predecessor company,
Bell & Howell Company, was incorporated in Delaware in 1907. On January 31, 2005, we
completed the acquisition of Voyager Expanded Learning, Inc. (VEL) in support of our long-term
strategy to grow our educational business for grades K-12. On October 28, 2005, we sold our
periodical microfilm operation to National Archive Publishing Company (NAPC) for $21.9 million.
On November 28, 2006, we sold ProQuest Business Solutions (PQBS) to Snap-on Incorporated
(Snap-on) for $514 million and the assumption of approximately $19 million of PQBS debt by
Snap-on. On February 9, 2007, we sold ProQuest Information and Learning (PQIL) and the ProQuest
brand for $195.2 million. On June 30, 2007 ProQuest Company amended Article I of its Certificate
of Incorporation solely to change the corporate name from ProQuest Company to Voyager Learning
Company. The name change and amendment were completed pursuant to Section 253(b) of the Delaware
General Corporation Law through a merger of the Companys wholly-owned subsidiary, Voyager Learning
Company, with and into the Company.
2
Our results from continuing operations are reported as a single business segment, Voyager
Education (VED). As a result of the sale of PQBS in 2006 and the sale of PQIL in 2007, results
for those units are reported as earnings from discontinued
operations in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal
years ended December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006. An overview of our ongoing operation follows.
We
currently focus on three market areas related to K-12 education: reading programs and
resources, math and science programs and resources, and professional development programs. We are
a leading provider of results-driven reading and math intervention programs, professional
development programs regarding the teaching of reading, subscription-based online supplemental
reading, math and science resources and programs, and a core reading program for school districts
throughout the United States (U.S.).
Our reading programs include: Voyager Passport, a comprehensive reading intervention system
for K-5; Voyager Universal Literacy System®, a K-3 core reading program; Passport Reading
Journeys, a middle school reading intervention system for grades 6-9; TimeWarp® Plus, a K-9 summer
school reading intervention program; Voyager Pasaporte, a K-3 reading intervention system in
Spanish; and Learning A-Z, a group of related websites known as Reading A-Z, Raz-Kids,
Reading-tutors, Vocabulary A-Z, and Writing A-Z which provide online supplemental reading,
writing and vocabulary lessons, books, and other resources for students and teachers.
Our math and science programs include: Vmath®, a math intervention system for grades 3-8;
ExploreLearning, a subscription-based online library of interactive simulations in math and
science for grades 3-12; and Science A-Z , a Learning A-Z website aimed at the supplemental
science market.
VoyagerU® is our professional development program for teachers, literacy coaches and
administrators.
Our products have achieved acceptance across a broad, economically and geographically diverse
customer base. Voyager intervention and other products currently serve over 700,000 students in
more than 1,000 school districts in all 50 states. Learning A-Z serves approximately 212,000
teachers in all states and in over 140 countries. ExploreLearning serves over 58,000 subscribers in
approximately 2,600 schools within over 20 countries.
3
The Company counts some of the nations largest districts
among its major customers, including Los Angeles, Clark County, Houston, New York City,
Buffalo, Richmond, VA, Cleveland, Milwaukee, and Miami-Dade County. The breadth of the customer
base provides the Company with a national platform from which to launch new products, address new
markets, and cross-sell products to existing customers.
Our customers generally purchase our reading, math or professional development programs along
with any necessary implementation services or training for a single school year. In subsequent
school years, customers wishing to serve the same number of students generally need to purchase new
student materials or renew access to online content but do not typically repurchase
teacher materials. Learning A-Z and ExploreLearning online
subscriptions generally run for a twelve month period. In 2008, we generated approximately 76% of
sales from reading programs, 13% of sales from math and science programs, 6% of sales from
professional development programs, and 5% from other products and services.
Product Review
Reading Programs
Voyager Passport provides direct, systematic instruction in each of the five essential reading
components (phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension) and is designed as
an intervention program for K-5 students for whom a core reading program is not sufficient. The
lessons are typically daily and run 30 to 40 minutes in duration. They are based on the latest
scientific research regarding effective reading instruction and are carefully designed to effectively
and efficiently address each of the strategies and skills necessary to improve the reading ability
of struggling readers.
The
Voyager Universal Literacy System is a comprehensive core reading
curriculum for grades K-3 that
explicitly and systematically teaches the five essential components of reading instruction as
outlined by the National Reading Panel in 2000.
In 2007, we began offering an interactive web-based program called Ticket to Read
(www.tickettoread.com) with our Passport and Universal Literacy System programs. Ticket to Read is
designed to improve reading by allowing students to practice various aspects of reading skills.
Instruction is leveled, self-paced and teacher monitored. Students are motivated by a
leader board, a virtual clubhouse that includes earning online
tickets and other rewards, games, and engaging self-selected passages
on a variety of topics as they build vocabulary, fluency, phonics and
reading comprehension skills. Approximately a quarter of the use takes place after school hours
including weekends. The tool enables schools to get parents and/or
guardians involved in their childrens education.
4
Passport Reading Journeys is a targeted intervention program designed to accelerate reading
for struggling readers in middle school and high school. The lesson format integrates reading,
comprehension, vocabulary, fluency and writing. Age-appropriate content, real-life journeys on
DVDs, online interactive lessons, and captivating text hold student interest and motivate students
to read for both information and enjoyment. The program targets the affective domain as much as
the cognitive domain as many struggling readers have lost confidence,
are not engaged, and are close to dropping out.
The program meets all of the instructional recommendations of the Reading Next Report and provides
teachers with the tools necessary to help students become successful readers.
Voyager
TimeWarp Plus is a four to six week summer reading intervention
program which immerses K-9 students in
reading adventures to build essential reading skills that can prevent summer learning loss and
prepare students for the coming year. TimeWarp Plus is a balanced, research-based reading program
offered as a two to four hour daily reading instruction focused around exciting, adventure-based
themes and hands-on learning experiences. Student engagement and
maximizing teacher time are key components of the program.
Voyager
Pasaporte provides students in grades K-3 with targeted reading intervention in Spanish,
using similar scientifically-based reading research and framework as Voyager Passport. The lessons
are typically run daily for 30 to 40 minutes in duration. They are based on the latest scientific
research regarding effective reading instruction and are carefully designed to effectively and
efficiently address each of the strategies and skills necessary to improve the reading ability of
struggling Spanish speaking children who can not read effectively in any language. Built-in
assessment and progress monitoring tools provide teachers with vital information about student
learning so they can adjust instruction as needed.
5
We also sell online supplemental reading products under the Learning A-Z brand. There are
three free web sites, (LearningPage, Sites for Teachers, and Sites for Parents),
which aid in directing interested parents, teachers, schools and
districts to our six
subscription-based sites: Reading A-Z, Raz-Kids, Reading-Tutors, Vocabulary A-Z, Writing A-Z, and
Science A-Z. Each of these websites offers products available for purchase
through online subscriptions.
Our Learning A-Z divisions flagship product, Reading A-Z (www.readinga-z.com), offers
thousands of research-based printable teacher materials to teach guided reading, phonological
awareness, phonics, comprehension, fluency, letter recognition and formation, high frequency words,
poetry, and vocabulary. The teaching resources include professionally developed downloadable
leveled books (27 levels), a systematic phonics program that includes decodable books, high
frequency word books, poetry books, nursery rhymes, vocabulary books, read-aloud books, lesson
plans, worksheets, graphic organizers, and reading assessments. All leveled books, worksheets,
graphic organizers and quizzes are available as printable PDF files and as projectables for use on
interactive and non-interactive whiteboards. The leveled books and a variety of other books are
available in Spanish and French, as well as a version with UK spellings.
Raz-Kids (www.raz-kids.com) is a student-centered online collection of interactive
leveled books and quizzes designed to guide and motivate emergent and reluctant readers, as well as
improve the skills of fluent readers. Students can listen to and read books as well as record their
reading and then take an online quiz while receiving immediate feedback. Students earn stars for
their reading activity. The stars can then be spent in each students personal clubhouse-like
environment for purchasing a catalog full of items that include aliens and other fun characters.
The program currently consists of over 300 online books along with companion quizzes and worksheets
spread over 27 levels of difficulty. The website also features a classroom management system for
teachers to build rosters, assign books, and review student reading activity.
Reading-Tutors (www.reading-tutors.com) is a low-cost, easy-to-use collection of
research-based resource packets for tutors. Each of the 400 packets contains items tutors need to
help emerging readers gain key literacy skills in the alphabet, phonological awareness, phonics,
high-frequency words, fluency and comprehension. It also has all the resources needed to train
tutors as well as set up and run a successful tutoring program.
6
Vocabulary A-Z (www.vocabularya-z.com) provides customized and pre-made vocabulary
lessons for use by teachers to improve student vocabularies. Vocabulary A-Z has thousands of
vocabulary words that can be used to generate custom vocabulary lessons and assessments. Word
activities and worksheets are available based on the word lists the user generates. The Vocabulary
A-Z lesson generator incorporates best practices from current educational research.
Writing A-Z (www.writinga-z.com) provides teachers with a comprehensive collection of
resources to enhance the writing proficiency of students in grades K-6. The site provides core
writing lessons grouped by genre including student packets with leveled materials, mini-lessons
that target key writing processes and skills, and writing tools for organizing and improving
writing.
Math and Science Programs
Vmath
is a targeted, systematic intervention system that is
aligned with the tenets of the National Council of Teachers of
Mathematics and is designed to complement and enhance all
major math programs by building upon and reinforcing the concepts,
skills, and strategies of a core math program. Through 30 to 40 minutes of daily instruction, Vmath helps struggling students build
a foundation in math and learn the skills and concepts crucial to achieving grade-level success.
In January 2007 we added the VmathLive online math capability targeting additional student practice for grades
3-8. In 2008 we added ExploreLearning online simulations to provide visual instruction of
concepts.
Low-performing math students may need summer intervention to prevent summer learning loss in
math as well as in reading. Vmath Summer Adventure combines explicit instruction in essential math
concepts and skills and real-life adventures to stimulate student interest and understanding over a
shortened summer school program for grades K-8.
ExploreLearning supplies online simulations in math and science. ExploreLearning has won
National Science Foundation funding, supports the tenets of the National Council of Teachers of
Mathematics and has received positive mention in books published by the Association of Supervision
and Curriculum Development and the National Science Teachers Association. ExploreLearning
materials are correlated to state standards and over 120 math and science textbooks. Like Learning
A-Z, ExploreLearning is an online subscription-based business.
7
The Learning A-Z website Science A-Z (www.sciencea-z.com) provides teachers with an
online collection of resources to improve student skills in both science and reading. The website
offers a collection of downloadable resources organized into thematic units aligned with state
standards. The materials are categorized into four scientific domains: life, earth, physical and
process science. The thematic units are organized into three grade level grouping, K-2, 3-4, and
5-6. The theme packs include lessons, books, high- interest information sheets, career sheets,
and process activities. Within each grade span, all books and information sheets are written
to a high, medium, and low level of difficulty. The website includes many other science resources
including science fair resources and a monthly Science In the News feature.
Professional Development Programs
VoyagerU is a professional development program delivered to reading teachers, coaches, and
educators in collaboration with state-wide and school district-wide professional development
initiatives. It is designed to improve teacher effectiveness by providing a consistent approach to
teaching reading. The program blends independent student instruction
with facilitator-led training. We offer courses that are comprehensive or targeted for specific reading skills.
Participants may earn college credit and hours toward professional development requirements.
VoyagerU has been demonstrated to improve teacher instruction and student reading performance.
Business Development.
Curriculum Development. We continually seek to take advantage of new product and technology
opportunities and view product development to be essential to maintaining and growing our market
position. We develop our products using a combination of employees and outside resources such as
university professors, research experts, and topical experts. We generally conduct an extensive
refresh of our products every three to five years to incorporate the latest research, bring images
current, and update factual content. The web based products are enhanced continuously. Between
the product refreshes, we often develop variations, expansions (i.e. more grade levels) and other
basic enhancements of our products. As of December 31, 2008, we had 87 employees in curriculum
development. Research and development expense was $5.3 million, $4.5
million and $5.2 million for fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
8
Sales
and Marketing. We currently organize our marketing and sales
force around Voyager
Expanded Learning, Learning A-Z and ExploreLearning products. Within these product lines, sales
producers sell all available products and are generalist relationship managers. They are supported
by product or subject matter experts as well as a corporate marketing team. As of December 31,
2008, our sales force consisted of 55 field and 46 inside sales
producers for a total of 101
direct sales producers excluding sales management and marketing.
Field and inside sales producers are segmented primarily based on
size of district.
Proprietary Rights
We regard certain of our technologies and content as proprietary and rely primarily on a
combination of copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, and employee or vendor non-disclosure
agreements to protect our rights.
To a much lesser degree, we also license from third parties certain technology content or
services upon which we rely to deliver our products and services to our customers.
We derive the majority of our curriculum content through in-house development efforts.
Curriculum developed in house or developed through the use of independent contractors is the
proprietary property of the Company. The curriculum developed might be augmented or complemented
with third party products, which may include printed materials, video or photographs. This third
party content may be sourced from various providers who retain the appropriate trademarks and
copyright to the material and agree to our use on a nonexclusive, fee-based arrangement.
Our Trademarks are: Voyager Expanded Learning®, Voyager Learning®, VoyagerU®, Voyager
Universal Literacy System®, TimeWarp®, TimeWarp® Plus, Voyager Passport, California Voyager
Passport, Voyager Pasaporte, Vmath®, VmathLive, eVoyages®, Passport Reading Journeys, Reading
A-Z, Raz-Kids, Reading-tutors, Vocabulary A-Z, Writing A-Z, ScienceA-Z.com, Learning A-Z,
LearningPage, ExploreLearning, Gizmo, VIP®, Vital Indicators of Progress®, VPORT®, SOLO®,
Strategic Online Learning Opportunities®, Ticket to Read, and Expect Results. Each trademark,
trade name, or service mark of any other company appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
belongs to its holder.
9
Seasonality
Our quarterly operating results fluctuate due to a number
of factors including the academic school year, funding cycles, the amount and timing of new
products, and our spending patterns. In addition, our customers experience cyclical funding issues
that can impact our revenue patterns. Historically, we have experienced our lowest sales and
earnings in the first and fourth fiscal quarters with our highest sales and earnings in the second
and third fiscal quarters.
Competition
The
market for our products and services is highly competitive. We
compete with basal text book suppliers such as Houghton Mifflin/Harcourt (Riverdeep), Scott Foresman (Pearson), and McGraw-Hill,
who offer intervention products, often as part of their core reading programs, as well as
supplemental suppliers including Cambium Learning, Scientific Learning, and Scholastic.
Government Regulations
Our operations are governed by laws and regulations relating to equal employment
opportunity, workplace safety, information privacy, and worker health, including the Occupational
Safety and Health Act and regulations hereunder. Additionally, as a Company that often bids on
various state, local and federally funded programs, we are subject to various governmental
procurement policies and regulations. We believe that we are in compliance in all material
respects with applicable laws and regulations and that future compliance will not have a material
adverse effect upon our consolidated operations or financial condition.
Concentration Risk
We are not overly dependent upon any one customer or a few customers, the loss of which would
have a material adverse effect on our business. In fiscal 2007 and 2008, no single customer
represented more than 10% of our consolidated net sales on an annual basis for either year. The
top five customers accounted for approximately 22% of the Companys net sales in 2008.
Employees
Our future success is substantially dependent on the performance of our management team and
our ability to attract and retain qualified technical and managerial personnel.
As of December 31, 2008, we had 399 employees. None of our
employees are represented by collective bargaining agreements.
10
Website Access to Company Reports
We make available free of charge through our website, www.voyagercompany.com, our Annual
Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all
amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practical after such material is electronically
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
We are providing the address to our website solely for the information of our investors. Our
website and the information contained therein or incorporated therein are not intended to be
incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Code of Ethics
In March 2003, we adopted a code of ethics, which was reviewed and updated in November 2008,
for all of our finance employees, including our Chief Financial Officer and our Chief Executive
Officer. A copy of this code of ethics is set forth on our website, www.voyagercompany.com. We
adopted this code to promote such standards as (1) honest and ethical conduct; (2) full, fair,
accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in our periodic reports; and (3) compliance with
applicable governmental rules and regulations. Amendments to, or waivers from, the code of ethics
will be posted on our website.
Also, in January 2004, we implemented a whistleblower hotline, as required under the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by engaging a third party service that provides anonymous reporting for
serious workplace ethical issues via phone and/or the Internet.
11
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
This section should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the
Company and the notes thereto included in this Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The following risk factors are as of the date of this report and are not necessarily risk
factors as of the December 31, 2008 financial statements.
In addition to risk factors otherwise set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, factors
that could cause actual
results to differ materially from the Companys forward-looking statements include, but are
not limited to, the following:
Our sales and profitability depend on our ability to continue to develop new products that
appeal to customers and end users.
We compete in markets characterized by continual change, product introductions and
enhancements, changes in customer demands and evolving industry standards. The technological and
curriculum life cycles of our products are difficult to estimate. Our business may
be harmed if we are not able to develop new products and invest in existing products to keep them
relevant in the market place.
Changes in funding for public schools could cause the demand for our products to decrease.
We derive a significant portion of our revenues from public schools, which are heavily
dependent on federal, state, and local government funding. In addition, the school appropriations
process is often slow, unpredictable and subject to many factors outside of our control.
Curtailments, delays, changes in leadership, shifts in priorities, or general reductions in funding
could delay or reduce our revenues. Funding difficulties experienced by schools could also cause
those institutions to be more resistant to price increases and could slow investments in
educational products which could harm our business.
The Companys business may be adversely affected by changes in state educational funding as a
result of changes in legislation, both at the federal and state level, changes in the state
procurement process, changes in government leadership, emergence of other priorities, and changes
in the condition of the local, state or U.S. economy. While in the past few years the availability
of state and federal funding for elementary and high school education has improved due to
legislation such as No Child Left Behind and Reading First, recent
reductions in and proposed elimination of appropriations for these
programs and mid-year 2008 state budget adjustments have and may
continue to cause some school districts to reduce spending on our
products. Further reductions in
funding for public schools may harm our recurring and new business if our customers are not able to
find and obtain alternative sources of funding.
12
We face intense competition and may not be able to successfully attract and retain customers.
The
market for our products and services is highly competitive. We
compete with both basal text book suppliers such as Houghton Mifflin/Harcourt (Riverdeep), Scott Foresman (Pearson), and McGraw-Hill,
who often offer intervention products free or at discounted prices as
part of their core reading programs as well as
supplemental suppliers including Cambium Learning, Scientific Learning, and Scholastic. Many of
our current and potential future competitors may have substantially greater financial resources,
name recognition, experience, and larger customer bases than we do. Accordingly, our competitors
may be able to respond more quickly to new technologies and changes in customer requirements, have
more favorable access to suppliers and devote greater resources to the development and sale of
their products. Any of the above results could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain
customers and harm our business.
Recent developments in the commercial credit markets and education funding environment may
adversely affect the Companys ability to pursue strategic alternatives, including the possible
sale of the Company.
Recently, the commercial credit markets in the U.S. have experienced a variety of difficulties
and changed economic conditions that could have an adverse impact on our ability to complete any of
the strategic alternatives the Company is considering, including the possible sale of the Company.
Potential acquirers of the Company may not be able to secure sufficient financing resources to
complete a possible transaction. Such restrictions may limit the number of potential purchasers
and could reduce the possible purchase price for the Company. Additionally, recent changes in
economic conditions could reduce funds available to states and schools for education spending and
recent changes in legislation reducing Reading First funding effective 2008 could have an
adverse impact on the value of the Company and our ability to complete any of the strategic
alternatives the Company is considering, including the possible sale of the Company.
Our intellectual property protection may be inadequate, allowing others to use our
technologies and thereby reduce our ability to compete.
We regard certain of the technology underlying our services and products as proprietary and we
rely on a combination of trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, employee and third-party
nondisclosure agreements and other contracts to establish and protect our technology and other
intellectual property rights. There can be no assurance the steps we take to protect our
proprietary technology will be adequate to prevent misappropriation of our technology, or to
prevent third parties from developing similar technology independently.
We license from third parties certain technology content and that content may not continue to
be available to us.
We also license from third parties certain technology content or services upon which we rely
to deliver our products and services to our customers. This technology may not continue to be
available to us on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Moreover, we may face claims from
persons who claim that their licensed technologies infringe upon or violate those persons
proprietary rights. These types of claims, regardless of the outcome, may be costly to defend and
may divert our managements efforts and resources.
13
Our products could infringe on the intellectual property of
others, which may cause us to engage in costly litigation and could cause us to pay
substantial damages and prohibit us from selling our products.
Third parties may assert infringement or other intellectual property claims against us based
on their intellectual property rights. If such claims are successful, we may have to pay
substantial damages for past infringement. We might also be
prohibited from selling our products or providing certain content without first obtaining a license
from the third party, which, if available at all, may require us to pay additional royalties. Even
if infringement claims against us are without merit, defending a lawsuit takes significant time,
may be expensive, and may divert management attention from other business concerns.
Our success depends on our ability to attract and retain key personnel.
Our success depends on our ability to attract and retain highly qualified management,
creative, and technical personnel. Members of our senior management team bring substantial
industry and management experience to our planning and execution. If they or other key employees
were to leave us, and we were unable to find qualified replacements, our business could be harmed.
We use the Internet extensively, and federal or state governments may adopt laws or
regulations that could expose us to substantial liability.
Due to the increasing usage of the Internet, federal and state governments may adopt laws or
regulations regarding commercial online services, the Internet, user privacy, intellectual property
rights, content regulation, and taxation. Laws and regulations directly applicable to online
commerce or Internet communications are becoming more prevalent and could expose us to substantial
liability. For example, certain U.S. laws, such as the federal Digital Millennium Copyright Act
and various federal laws aimed at protecting children and limiting the content made available to
them, could expose us to substantial liability. Furthermore, various proposals at the federal,
state, and local level could impose additional taxes on internet sales. These laws, regulations,
and proposals could decrease Internet commerce and other Internet uses and adversely affect the
success of our online products and business.
14
We could experience system failures, software errors or capacity constraints, any of which
would cause interruptions in our delivery of electronic content to customers and ultimately may
cause us to lose customers.
Any delays or failures in the systems or errors in the software that we use for the technology
based component of our products which include assessment, reporting
tools and learning programs could harm our
business. We have occasionally suffered failures of the computer and telecommunication systems
that we use to deliver electronic content to customers. The growth of our customer base, as well
as the number of sites we provide, may strain our systems in the future. The systems we currently
use to deliver our services to customers (except for external telecommunications systems) are
located in our facilities in Dallas, Texas, Charlottesville, Virginia and Tucson, Arizona as well
as in a third party data center in Allen, Texas. Although we maintain property insurance, claims
for any system failure could exceed our coverage. In addition, our products could be affected by
failures associated with third party hosting providers or by failures of third party technology
used in our products, and we could have no control over remedying these failures. Any failures or
problems with our systems or software could force us to incur significant costs to remedy the
failure or problem, decrease customer demand for our products, tarnish our reputation and thus harm
our business.
Our systems face security risks and our customers have concerns about their privacy.
Our systems and websites may be vulnerable to unauthorized access by hackers, computer viruses
and other disruptive problems. Security breaches could lead to misappropriation of
our customers information, our websites, our intellectual property and other rights, as well as
disruption in the use of our systems and websites. Unauthorized access to, as well as denial of,
various internet and online services has occurred, and will likely occur again. Any security
breach related to our websites could tarnish our reputation and expose us to damages and
litigation. We may also incur significant costs to maintain our security precautions or to correct
problems caused by security breaches. Further, to maintain these security measures, we are
required to monitor our customers access to our websites which may cause disruption to our
customers use of our systems and websites. These disruptions and interruptions could harm our
business.
15
We have a single distribution center and could experience significant disruption of business
and ultimately lose customers in the event it was damaged or destroyed.
The Company stores and distributes the majority of its printed materials through a single
warehouse in Dallas, Texas. In the event that warehouse was damaged or destroyed, the Company
would be delayed in responding to customer requests. Customers often purchase materials very close
to the school year and such delivery delays could cause our customers to turn to competitors for
products they need immediately. While the Company maintains adequate property insurance, the loss
of customers could have a long term, detrimental impact on our reputation and business.
Our operating results continue to fluctuate, and a revenue or earnings shortfall in a
particular quarter could have a negative impact on the price of our common stock.
Variations in our operating results occur from time to time as a result of many factors, such
as the timing and amount of customers expenditures, our product mix, new product introductions,
and general economic conditions. Our sales cycles are relatively long and depend on factors such
as the size of customer orders and the terms of subscription agreements. Consequently, it is
difficult to predict if and when we will receive a customer order. Because a high percentage of
our expenses are fixed, the timing of customer orders can cause variations in quarterly operating
results. Certain customers buying patterns and funding availability generally cause our sales and
cash flow to be lower in the first and fourth quarters of the year. As a result of the difficulty
in forecasting our quarterly revenues, our operating results for
a quarter may fall below investors expectations, which may cause the price of our common
stock to fall abruptly and significantly.
16
Our stock price may be volatile, and your investment in our stock could decline in value.
Our common stock price has fluctuated significantly in the recent past. In addition, market
prices for securities of companies in our industry have been highly volatile and may continue to be
highly volatile in the future. Often the volatility in our common stock price is unrelated to our
operating performance. As a result of these fluctuations in the price of our common stock, you may
not be able to sell your common stock at or above the price you pay for it.
On March 28, 2007, the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) suspended the trading of the Companys
securities and, thereafter, the common stock of the Company began being quoted on the Pink Sheets
Electronic Quotation Service under the ticker symbol PQES.PK. On July 2, 2007, consistent with its
corporate name change, the Company began being quoted on the Pink Sheets Electronic Quotation
Service under the ticker symbol VLCY.PK.
We are a party to a number of matters of civil litigation that could have a material adverse
effect on our financial results.
The Company is involved in legal actions and claims arising in the ordinary course of
business. Due to the inherent uncertainty of the litigation process, the resolution of any
particular legal proceeding could have a material effect on the Companys financial position and
results of operations.
The impact of ongoing securities class action, derivative and insurance-related litigation may
be material. We are also subject to the risk of additional litigation and regulatory action in
connection with the restatement of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In connection with the restatements of our Consolidated Financial Statements described in our
2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K, we and certain of our former and current officers and directors
have been named as defendants in a number of lawsuits, including class action and shareholder
derivative suits. We
cannot currently predict the impact or outcome of these litigations, which could be material.
The continuation and outcome of these lawsuits and related ongoing investigations, as well as the
initiation of similar suits and investigations, may have a material adverse impact on our results
of operations and financial condition.
17
As a result of the restatement of our Consolidated Financial Statements described in our 2005
Annual Report on Form 10-K, we could become subject to additional class action, derivative or other
securities litigation. As of the date hereof, we are not aware of any additional litigation or
investigation having been commenced against us related to these matters, but we cannot predict
whether any such litigation or regulatory investigation will be commenced or, if it is, the outcome
of any such litigation or investigation. The initiation of any additional securities litigation or
investigations, together with the lawsuits and investigations described above, may also harm our
business and financial condition.
18
Our insurance coverage could be insufficient to cover losses we may incur as a result of
litigation.
The Company has received a reservation of rights notice from its insurance carriers regarding
coverage under the Directors and Officers liability insurance policies and there can be no
assurance that the carriers will cover the costs of defense or any judgment or settlement in whole
or in part. If an adverse judgment is rendered or a settlement is reached in excess of the
insurance coverage limits, the Company may experience a material adverse impact on its financial
condition.
For a further description of the nature and status of these legal proceedings, see Item 3
Legal Proceedings.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
The information set forth in Item 3 of this report regarding SEC proceedings is incorporated
herein by reference.
Item 2. Properties.
As of December 31, 2008, our principal corporate office is located in Dallas, Texas. For our
ongoing operations, we lease facilities in Dallas, Texas, Charlottesville, Virginia, Tucson,
Arizona and Ann Arbor, Michigan.
The Company announced plans after the sale of PQBS and PQIL to transition all of its corporate
functions from its Ann Arbor headquarters to Dallas during 2007 and 2008. From the date of the
sale of PQIL, the Company subleased substantial space to the buyer of PQIL. The Company, the owner
of the leased buildings in Ann Arbor, and the buyer of PQIL reached an agreement in March 2008
whereby the buyer of PQIL took full responsibility for the lease of the corporate headquarters and
former PQIL space in exchange for the Company paying $11 million to the buyer of PQIL. Under the
terms of the March 2008 agreement, we terminated our Ann Arbor leases and signed a sublease for
13,090 square feet in Ann Arbor, which was later reduced to 3,060 square feet by year-end 2008 in
order to continue performing certain information technology support functions.
19
The following table provides summary information in square
feet with respect to the facilities associated with continuing operations and corporate
headquarters as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(sq ft) |
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
164,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
164,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
We believe the buildings and equipment used in our continuing operations generally to be in
good condition and adequate for our current needs and that additional space will be available as
needed.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
Putative Securities Class Actions
Between February and April 2006, four putative securities class actions, consolidated and
designated In re ProQuest Company Securities Litigation, were filed in the U.S. District Court for
the Eastern District of Michigan (the Court) against the Company and certain of its former and
then-current officers and directors. Each of these substantially similar lawsuits alleged that the
Company and certain officers and directors (the Defendants) violated Sections 10(b) and/or 20(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as well as the associated
Rule 10b-5, in connection with the Companys proposed restatement.
On May 2, 2006, the Court ordered the four cases consolidated and appointed lead plaintiffs
and lead plaintiffs counsel.
On July 22, 2008, the Company reached an agreement in principle to settle the consolidated
shareholder securities class action law suit filed against it and certain officers and directors in
the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan for $20 million. A Stipulation and
Agreement of Settlement was signed by the parties and the Court granted preliminary approval of
such agreement. During January 2009, the Company paid $4 million into an escrow account and our
insurers funded the remaining portion of the settlement into the escrow account. The
settlement is subject to final Court approval. There is no assurance that a final Court approval
will be obtained. If the settlement arrangement is not finalized, the Company intends to defend
itself vigorously.
20
Shareholder Derivative Lawsuits
On April 18, 2006 and December 19, 2006, respectively, two shareholder derivative lawsuits
were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (the Court),
purportedly on behalf of the Company against certain current and former officers and directors of
the Company by certain of the Companys shareholders. Both cases were assigned to Honorable Avern
Cohn, who entered a stipulated order staying the litigation pending completion of the Companys
restatement and a special committee investigation into the restatement.
On January 29, 2008, the Court entered an order consolidating the two cases and approving
co-lead and co-liaison counsel representing plaintiffs. Pursuant to a stipulated scheduling order
entered on February 15, 2008, plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint on March 20, 2008.
The consolidated amended complaint purports to state claims for breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of
control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets, unjust enrichment, rescission, imposition
of a constructive trust, violations of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and violations of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against current and former officers or directors of the Company and
one of its subsidiaries. On December 3, 2008 the Company reached an agreement in principle to
settle the shareholder derivative litigation law suit filed against it and certain officers and
directors in the Court. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company and its insurers would pay
an amount not to exceed $650,000 in attorneys fees and agree to maintain or adopt additional
corporate governance standards. The Companys portion of this amount is equal to $500,000. The
parties entered into Stipulation of Settlement on January 9, 2009. This Stipulation of Settlement
is subject to Court approval and the provision of notice to shareholders. There is no assurance
that a final Court approval will be obtained or putative class member participation will be
sufficient. If the derivative litigation settlement arrangement is not finalized, the Company
intends to defend itself vigorously.
21
Securities and Exchange Commission Investigation
In February 2006, the Division of Enforcement of the SEC commenced an informal inquiry
regarding the Companys announcement of a possible restatement. In April 2006, the Division of
Enforcement of the SEC commenced a formal, non-public investigation in connection with the
Companys restatement. On July 22, 2008, the SEC (Commission) filed a settled enforcement action against
the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Pursuant to that
settlement, the terms of which were disclosed previously by the Company, without admitting or
denying the allegations in the Complaint, the Company consented to the filing by the Commission of
a Complaint, and to the imposition by the Court of a final judgment of permanent injunction against
the Company. The Complaint alleges civil violations of the reporting, books and records and
internal controls provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The final judgment was signed
by the Court on July 28, 2008 and permanently enjoins the Company from future violations of those
provisions. No monetary penalty was imposed. The settlement resolved fully the previously
disclosed SEC investigation of the Companys restatement.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
No matter was submitted to a vote of our stockholders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2008.
Part II
Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities.
On March 28, 2007, the NYSE suspended the trading of the Companys securities and, thereafter,
the common stock of the Company began being quoted on the Pink Sheets Electronic Quotation Service
under the ticker symbol PQES.PK. On July 2, 2007, consistent with its corporate name change, the
Company began being quoted on the Pink Sheets Electronic Quotation Service under the ticker symbol
VLCY.PK.
As of December 31, 2008, there were 756 holders of record of our common stock.
The
high and low closing sales prices or quotes of our common stock on the NYSE/Pink Sheets Electronic
Quotation Service were as follows. Because our stock is quoted on the
Pink Sheets Electronic Quotation Service, the closing prices may not
reflect actual transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
$ |
7.15 |
|
|
$ |
5.95 |
|
|
$ |
12.14 |
|
|
$ |
8.23 |
|
Second |
|
|
6.55 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
|
10.36 |
|
|
|
8.32 |
|
Third |
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
3.93 |
|
|
|
9.85 |
|
|
|
6.94 |
|
Fourth |
|
|
3.90 |
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
8.20 |
|
|
|
4.75 |
|
22
We made no share repurchases in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
We have not declared or paid any cash dividends to our shareholders. Any future determination to pay dividends will
be at the discretion of our Board of Directors.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
The following selected consolidated financial and operating data for continuing operations
have been derived from our Consolidated Financial Statements as of the end of and for each of the
fiscal years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2008. PQBS, which was sold in November
2006, and PQIL, which was sold in February 2007, are classified as discontinued operations for all
periods presented. The following data should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our Consolidated Financial
Statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere herein.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal |
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations Data: (1) (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
98,531 |
|
|
$ |
109,612 |
|
|
$ |
115,051 |
|
|
$ |
90,967 |
|
|
$ |
1,837 |
|
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization shown separately below) |
|
|
(35,939 |
) |
|
|
(36,192 |
) |
|
|
(37,417 |
) |
|
|
(30,874 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
62,592 |
|
|
|
73,420 |
|
|
|
77,634 |
|
|
|
60,093 |
|
|
|
1,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expense |
|
|
(5,302 |
) |
|
|
(4,532 |
) |
|
|
(5,198 |
) |
|
|
(4,127 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expense (3) |
|
|
(64,394 |
) |
|
|
(82,867 |
) |
|
|
(92,695 |
) |
|
|
(48,585 |
) |
|
|
(17,744 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
(21,358 |
) |
|
|
(23,190 |
) |
|
|
(23,865 |
) |
|
|
(20,513 |
) |
|
|
(663 |
) |
Goodwill impairment (4) |
|
|
(43,141 |
) |
|
|
(67,232 |
) |
|
|
(42,496 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease termination costs (5) |
|
|
(11,673 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before
interest, other income (expense), and income taxes |
|
|
(83,276 |
) |
|
|
(104,401 |
) |
|
|
(86,620 |
) |
|
|
(13,132 |
) |
|
|
(16,630 |
) |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
(27,464 |
) |
|
|
(18,915 |
) |
|
|
(378 |
) |
Other income (expense) |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
4,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense) (6) |
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
|
12,396 |
|
|
|
64,063 |
|
|
|
1,778 |
|
|
|
(25,097 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(81,504 |
) |
|
$ |
(87,262 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,021 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,269 |
) |
|
$ |
(42,105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss from continuing
operations per common share |
|
$ |
(2.73 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.92 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.68 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the End of Fiscal |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
67,302 |
|
|
$ |
53,868 |
|
|
$ |
39,902 |
|
|
$ |
30,957 |
|
|
$ |
4,313 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
304,097 |
|
|
|
402,727 |
|
|
|
833,531 |
|
|
|
917,114 |
|
|
|
535,968 |
|
Long-term debt and capital leases, less current maturities (7) |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
1,592 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Total debt and capital leases (7) |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
1,599 |
|
|
|
60,664 |
|
|
|
516,149 |
|
|
|
154,185 |
|
Total shareholders equity (deficit) (8) |
|
|
212,759 |
|
|
|
290,330 |
|
|
|
306,994 |
|
|
|
(48,447 |
) |
|
|
(51,073 |
) |
Footnotes to the Selected Financial Data:
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On January 31, 2005, we acquired all the outstanding ownership interest in VEL. The results of VELs
operations subsequent to the acquisition on January 31, 2005 are combined with the results of two
minor acquisitions (ExploreLearning and Learning A-Z), one made in 2004 and one made in 2005 to form the Voyager
Education VED segment reported as continuing operations in our Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
(2) |
|
The Company implemented a plan to sell its PQBS and PQIL operations during the second quarter of 2006.
The sale of PQBS was completed in November 2006 and the sale of PQIL was completed in February 2007.
Results of operations for PQBS and PQIL are reported as results from discontinued operations for all
periods presented. |
|
(3) |
|
In 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively, selling and administrative expenses include corporate costs of $14.9 million,
$34.1 million, and $46.2 million, the majority of which are associated with the closing of the Ann Arbor offices, financial
restatements, and completion of the sale of PQBS and PQIL. The transition of corporate offices from Ann Arbor, MI to Dallas, TX
was completed by year-end 2008. |
|
(4) |
|
The required annual testing for impairment of goodwill resulted in goodwill impairment
for the VED business unit in 2008, 2007, and 2006. See Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included herein for
further details. |
|
(5) |
|
In 2008 the Company entered into a series of agreements with its landlord regarding the termination of certain obligations
in relation to the long term leases for the facilities in Ann Arbor,
Michigan. The Company terminated and was released from all
obligations relating to these certain leases on March 7, 2008, resulting in a total charge to expense in the first quarter of
2008 for all lease termination costs. |
|
(6) |
|
Tax expense in 2004 reflects an increase in deferred tax expense of $25.1 million to reflect the impact
of establishing a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets as a result of restatement adjustments. |
|
(7) |
|
Upon closing on the sale of PQBS on November 28, 2006, we made a pro-rata payment of 89% of the
principal then outstanding under our 2002 Notes, our 2005 Notes and our Credit Agreement. Upon closing on
the sale of PQIL on February 9, 2007, we paid our remaining balances owed to our bank lenders and
Noteholders and were released from all obligations under the 2002 Note Purchase Agreement, the 2005 Note
Purchase Agreement, and the Credit Agreement. |
|
(8) |
|
Shareholders equity for 2006 reflects the $347.7 million gain from the sale of PQBS.
Shareholders equity for 2007 reflects the $46.6 million gain from the sale of PQIL. |
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
This section should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the
Company and the notes thereto included in this Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Organization of Information
Managements Discussion and Analysis includes the following sections:
|
|
|
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates |
|
|
|
Results of Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2008 Compared to Fiscal Year 2007 |
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2007 Compared to Fiscal Year 2006 |
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures and Outlook |
|
|
|
Commitments and Contractual Obligations |
|
|
|
Recently Issued Financial Accounting Standards |
24
Overview
As of December 31, 2008, we provide products and services through one business segment.
We focus on three market areas related to K-12 education: reading programs, math and science
programs, and professional development programs. We are a leading provider of results-driven,
in-school reading and math intervention programs, professional development programs regarding the
teaching of reading, subscription-based online supplemental reading and science programs, and a
core reading program for school districts throughout the U.S.
Certain reclassifications to the Consolidated Financial Statements for all prior periods
presented have been made to conform to the 2008 presentation. In prior years, we included
amortization of our acquired and developed curriculum and certain other operational assets in Cost
of Sales. In the current year presentation, all depreciation and amortization for the periods
presented herein has been segregated and shown as a separate line item on the Consolidated
Statements of Operations. Also, in prior years, we included a line item in our Consolidated
Financial Statements entitled selling and administrative expense. In the current year
presentation, amounts previously included in this line item have been reclassified into the line
items sales and marketing expense, general and administrative expense, or depreciation and
amortization expense. A summary of the impact of these conforming reclassifications on previously
filed results is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 in |
|
|
2006 as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 in |
|
|
|
Originally |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Year |
|
|
Originally |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Year |
|
|
|
Filed |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Presentation |
|
|
Filed |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Presentation |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
(55,720 |
) |
|
$ |
19,528 |
|
|
$ |
(36,192 |
) |
|
$ |
(57,279 |
) |
|
$ |
19,862 |
|
|
$ |
(37,417 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
|
53,892 |
|
|
|
19,528 |
|
|
|
73,420 |
|
|
|
57,772 |
|
|
|
19,862 |
|
|
|
77,634 |
|
Selling and administrative expense |
|
|
(86,529 |
) |
|
|
86,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96,698 |
) |
|
|
96,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,587 |
) |
|
|
(29,587 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,614 |
) |
|
|
(27,614 |
) |
General and administrative expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,280 |
) |
|
|
(53,280 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65,081 |
) |
|
|
(65,081 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,190 |
) |
|
|
(23,190 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,865 |
) |
|
|
(23,865 |
) |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the U.S., which require management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses, and related disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities.
On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates including those related to accounting for
revenue recognition, impairment, capitalization and depreciation, allowances for doubtful accounts
and sales returns, inventory reserves, income taxes, and other contingencies. We base our
estimates on historical experience and other assumptions we believe are reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of
assets and liabilities that may not be readily available from other sources. Actual results may
differ from these estimates, which could have a material impact on our financial statements.
25
Certain accounting policies require higher degrees of judgment than others in their
application. We consider the following to be critical accounting policies due to the judgment
involved in each. For a detail discussion of our significant accounting policies see Note 1 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.
Revenue Recognition. We account for our revenues under Staff Accounting Bulletin No.
104, "Revenue Recognition (SAB No. 104). Revenues are derived from sales of reading, math and
science, and professional development solutions to school districts
primarily in the U.S. Sales include
printed materials and often online access to educational materials for individual students,
teachers, and classrooms. Revenue from the sale of printed materials for reading and math products
is recognized when the product is shipped to or received by the customer. Revenue for product
support, implementation services, and online subscriptions is recognized over the period services
are delivered. The division of revenue between shipped materials, online materials, and ongoing
support and services is determined in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force 00-21, Revenue
Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables (EITF 00-21). Revenue for our professional development
courses, which includes an internet delivery component, is recognized over the contractual delivery
period, typically nine to twelve months. Revenue for the online content sold separately or
included with our curriculum materials is recognized ratably over the subscription period,
typically a school year. Shipments to school book depositories are on consignment and revenue is
recognized based on shipments from the depositories to the schools.
ExploreLearning and Learning A-Z derive revenue exclusively from sales of online subscriptions
to their reading, math and science teaching websites. Typically, the
subscriptions are for a twelve month period and the revenue is recognized ratably over the period the online access is available
to the customer.
Discontinued Operations. We sold PQBS on November 28, 2006. We sold PQIL on February
9, 2007. Accordingly, the operating results of these businesses have been segregated from our
continuing operations and are separately reported as discontinued operations.
26
Interest on consolidated debt that was repaid as a result of the PQBS and PQIL
disposal transactions
has been allocated between discontinued operations and continuing operations.
Impairment of Long Lived Assets. We review the carrying value of long lived assets
for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate net book value may not be
recoverable from the estimated undiscounted future cash flows, which is based on the requirements
of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No. 144). If our review indicates any assets are impaired,
the impairment of those assets is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the
fair value as estimated by discounted cash flows. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the
lower of the carrying amount or fair value less cost of disposal. The determination whether these
assets are impaired involves significant judgment based on projections of future performance.
Impairment of Goodwill. We review the carrying value of goodwill for impairment at
least annually based on the requirements of SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS No. 142). The annual analysis is performed during the fourth fiscal quarter or when
certain triggering events occur. The impairment test requires us to compare the fair value of each
reporting unit to its carrying value. For businesses or assets that have been sold, we use the
actual sales price in the determination of fair value. The determination whether these assets are
impaired involves significant judgment based on projections of future performance. Changes in
strategy and/or market conditions may result in further adjustments to recorded goodwill balances.
Developed Curriculum. We capitalize certain pre-publication costs of our curriculum
including art, prepress, editorial, and other costs incurred in the creation of the master copy of
our curriculum products. Curriculum development costs are amortized over the expected life of the
education program, generally on a straight-line basis over a period of three to five years. We
periodically review the recoverability of the capitalized costs based on expected net realizable
value.
Accounts Receivable. Accounts receivable are stated net of allowances for doubtful
accounts and estimated sales returns. These allowances are based on a review of the outstanding
balances and historical collection experience. The reserve for sales returns is based on
historical rates of returns.
27
Reserve for Obsolete Inventory. We estimate a reserve for obsolete inventory.
Inventory reserves are reviewed on a periodic basis and required adjustments, if any, are made.
Income Taxes. Provision is made for the expense, or benefit, associated with taxes
based on income. The provision for income taxes is based on laws currently enacted in every
jurisdiction in which we do business and considers laws mitigating the taxation of the same income
by more than one jurisdiction. Significant judgment is required in determining income tax expense,
current tax receivables and payables, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and valuation allowance
recorded against the net deferred tax assets. Management considers the scheduled reversal of
deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, taxable income in prior carryback years,
loss carryforward limitations, and tax planning strategies in assessing whether deferred tax assets
will be realized in future periods. If, after consideration of these factors, management believes
it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a
valuation allowance is established. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable
could be reduced if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced.
Other Contingencies. Other contingencies are recorded when it is probable that a
liability exists and the value can be reasonably estimated.
28
Results of Continuing Operations
VEL and ExploreLearning were both acquired in 2005 and Learning A-Z was acquired in 2004.
These operations together are Voyager Education and comprise our single reporting segment. The
continuing operations presented below include the operational activities for VED and the activities
based in Ann Arbor, Michigan required to finalize the restatement efforts, transition the corporate
office to Dallas, Texas, and complete the sale of PQIL.
We determined to sell PQBS and PQIL in the second quarter of 2006. PQBS was sold on November
28, 2006 and PQIL was sold on February 9, 2007 and therefore their results are classified as
discontinued operations and excluded from the following discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
sales |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
sales |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
98,531 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
109,612 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
115,051 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization shown separately below) |
|
|
(35,939 |
) |
|
|
(36.5 |
) |
|
|
(36,192 |
) |
|
|
(33.0 |
) |
|
|
(37,417 |
) |
|
|
(32.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
62,592 |
|
|
|
63.5 |
|
|
|
73,420 |
|
|
|
67.0 |
|
|
|
77,634 |
|
|
|
67.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expense |
|
|
(5,302 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
(4,532 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
(5,198 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
Sales and marketing expense |
|
|
(33,734 |
) |
|
|
(34.2 |
) |
|
|
(29,587 |
) |
|
|
(27.0 |
) |
|
|
(27,614 |
) |
|
|
(24.0 |
) |
General and administrative expense |
|
|
(30,660 |
) |
|
|
(31.1 |
) |
|
|
(53,280 |
) |
|
|
(48.6 |
) |
|
|
(65,081 |
) |
|
|
(56.6 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
(21,358 |
) |
|
|
(21.7 |
) |
|
|
(23,190 |
) |
|
|
(21.2 |
) |
|
|
(23,865 |
) |
|
|
(20.8 |
) |
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
(43,141 |
) |
|
|
(43.8 |
) |
|
|
(67,232 |
) |
|
|
(61.3 |
) |
|
|
(42,496 |
) |
|
|
(36.9 |
) |
Lease termination costs |
|
|
(11,673 |
) |
|
|
(11.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
before interest, other income (expense)
and income taxes |
|
|
(83,276 |
) |
|
|
(84.5 |
) |
|
|
(104,401 |
) |
|
|
(95.2 |
) |
|
|
(86,620 |
) |
|
|
(75.3 |
) |
Net interest income (expense) |
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(27,464 |
) |
|
|
(23.9 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
4,408 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
12,396 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
64,063 |
|
|
|
55.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(81,504 |
) |
|
|
(82.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(87,262 |
) |
|
|
(79.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,021 |
) |
|
|
(43.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2008 Compared to Fiscal Year 2007
Overview
During 2008, we experienced a decline in net sales, or revenues, due to lower order volume and
higher revenue deferral rates. The decline in order volume is primarily attributed to market
conditions, most notably, the amount of funding available to schools to purchase our products and
services declined significantly. Funding to schools from the federal level declined as the Reading
First program was reduced. Local funding declined as a result of lower property tax receipts.
Additionally, higher operating costs in the schools from midyear fuel cost increases further
depleted available funds. The revenue decline is greater than the volume decline primarily due
to the change of product mix towards more service based or technology based products, which
requires a greater degree of deferred revenue recognition over the period of product use.
29
While revenues declined in 2008, our spending for sales and marketing increased as we sought
to maintain sales volumes in an increasingly challenging market and due to costs associated with
our participation in several 2008 state adoptions. In late 2008, to respond to the market
conditions and the related decline in revenue, we reduced our cost structure through a reduction in
force in November 2008 and we enacted plans to reduce selected non-headcount areas. The reduction
in force affected 26 fulltime employees and roughly 15 equivalent contractor positions. The
reduction was almost exclusively in the Voyager Expanded Learning product line as well as in
general overhead, as opposed to our Learning A-Z or ExploreLearning product lines. The 26
positions represented 7% of the Companys total full time work force.
Other significant developments include the following:
|
|
|
The increasing usage of web-based capabilities within our curriculum, including
Ticket to Read and VmathLive, has had a positive impact on student achievement and
stand-alone sales of these products has increased. We believe such capabilities are an
emerging trend within education and that we are well positioned to capture market share
in this space. |
|
|
|
Our web-based products have seen a significant increase in usage outside of normal
school hours, including weekends, which increases the advocacy of our products among
influential groups, such as students, teachers and parents. |
|
|
|
Participation in the 2008 Florida adoption has proved successful
in generating sales, customer acceptance, and student achievement. |
|
|
|
We filed all of our fiscal quarterly reports for 2008 in January 2009. Upon filing
these reports, the Company became current with its filings with the SEC after three
years of delinquent reporting following the discovery of material irregularities in our
accounting in January 2006. |
30
Operating Trends
The following trends have or may have a positive impact on our revenues and profitability:
|
|
|
Sales of our online subscription based products grew significantly in 2008 and we
expect growth to continue in the coming years. |
|
|
|
We believe our product diversification, such as growth in the online offerings and
new intervention products for higher grades, will allow us to strengthen our ability to
sustain share in a troubled market and capture share when the market recovers. |
|
|
|
We believe our focus on usage and partnership with the customer to implement our
solutions with fidelity will result in higher success rates and such success, if
achieved, will lead to customer retention and growth through reference sales. |
|
|
|
Efforts taken in 2008 to reduce our cost structure, including the reduction in
force, better aligns our cost structure to current market conditions. |
Negative operating trends include:
|
|
|
Adverse developments in the education funding environment, including the reductions
in Reading First funding that occurred in 2008 and reductions in available state and
local funds as property taxes decline, have impacted our operations during the current
year and may continue to have and potentially increase the impact on our future sales,
profits, cash flows and carrying value of assets. |
|
|
|
School districts may find it difficult to secure alternative funding sources in the
midst of the current market conditions. |
Recently Passed Federal Legislation
In February 2009 the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA) was passed. The Act
provides significant new federal funding for various education initiatives over the next two
years. While the education funding is for a broad set of initiatives, a meaningful amount is
anticipated to be targeted for programs often used by schools for our products. While success in winning some
of these funds for our products is not certain, we believe it has the potential to stabilize some
of the negative funding trends which emerged in 2008.
31
Net Sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reading programs |
|
$ |
75.6 |
|
|
$ |
87.1 |
|
Math and science programs |
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
Professional development |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
Other (primarily freight) |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
98.5 |
|
|
$ |
109.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales from continuing operations decreased $11.1 million, or 10.1%, to $98.5 million
in 2008. The decrease was primarily driven by lower order volume and higher revenue deferral rates
in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007. We experienced weakness in markets and products that have
heavy reliance on federal, state and local funding sources. Our reading intervention for middle
school students and our online offerings continue to grow, but that growth was not enough to offset
declines in products with heavy reliance on federal funding. In 2008, we deferred a larger
percentage of sales compared to 2007 as we continue the trend of including more service and
technology in our products. On-line access and service elements are delivered over time rather
than immediately shipped to customers like printed materials. We defer the revenue associated with
those services and on-line access and recognize the revenue over the period they are delivered.
Gross Profit.
Cost of sales includes expenses to print, purchase, handle and warehouse product and to
provide services and support to customers. Gross profit decreased $10.8 million in fiscal 2008 to
$62.6 million compared to $73.4 million in fiscal 2007. Our gross profit percentage for 2008
decreased 3.5 percentage points to 63.5% compared to 67.0% for 2007. The decrease is primarily due
to the deferral of a larger percentage of sales in 2008 versus 2007, which reduced net sales but
did not have an offsetting and corresponding decrease in cost of sales. The higher deferral
percentages are primarily due to increased revenue attributed to our online materials, which are
recognized over the period access is provided. To a lesser degree, the gross profit declined due
to increases in printing costs as our
product was upgraded in quality and the Company chose to produce more specialized, state specific
versions to sell in state adoptions.
32
Research and Development.
Research and development expenditures include costs to research, evaluate and develop
educational products, net of capitalization. Research and development expense for fiscal 2008
increased $0.8 million to $5.3 million compared to $4.5 million in fiscal 2007, primarily due to
the ratio of capitalizable versus non-capitalizable activities performed during the year.
Sales and Marketing.
Sales and marketing expenditures include all costs related to selling efforts and marketing
costs. Sales and marketing expense for fiscal 2008 increased $4.1 million to $33.7 million
compared to $29.6 million in fiscal 2007, as we sought to maintain sales volumes in an increasingly
challenging market and due to costs associated with our participation in several 2008 state
adoptions. The increase in expenditures was primarily in our growth products without a
corresponding decrease in spending associated with products which declined in sales.
General and Administrative.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VED |
|
$ |
15.8 |
|
|
$ |
19.2 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
30.7 |
|
|
$ |
53.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses decreased $22.6 million, or 42.4%, to $30.7 million
compared to fiscal 2007. General and administrative activities include $14.9 million for 2008 and
$34.1 million for the comparable period of 2007 related to activities based in Ann Arbor, Michigan
required to finalize the restatement and SEC filing efforts, transition the corporate office to
Dallas, Texas, and complete the sale of PQIL.
Both the Corporate and Dallas-based general and administrative expenses decreased in 2008 as
the efforts to
complete the restatement, get current on SEC filings, and finalize the transition efforts were
brought closer to conclusion in 2008.
33
Goodwill Impairment.
In conducting our annual goodwill impairment testing for fiscal 2008, we compared the book
value of the Companys single reporting unit to its estimated fair market value. These estimates of
fair market are dependent on multiple assumptions, estimates and inputs, including industry
fundamentals such as the state of educational funding and the actual performance and future
projections of the Company. As of year end 2008, the estimated fair market value of the reporting
unit was estimated to have fallen below the book value as a result of worsening and prolonged
adverse developments in the overall education funding environment, including the reductions in
Reading First funding effective 2008 and the reductions in available state and local funds. As a
result of these factors, an impairment charge of $43.1 million was recorded in 2008.
In conducting our annual goodwill impairment testing for fiscal 2007, we compared the book
value of goodwill attributed to VED with the estimated fair market value of VED. These estimates of
fair market are dependent on multiple assumptions and inputs, including industry fundamentals such
as the state of educational funding and the actual performance and future projections of the
Company. As of year end 2007, the estimated fair market value of VED was estimated to be less than
the book value as a result of lower future cash flow projections, driven by adverse developments in
the education funding environment at the federal and local level. An impairment charge of $67.2
million related to VED was recorded in 2007 as a result of these factors.
Lease Termination Costs.
On January 1, 2008, we entered into an agreement with one of our lessors, Relational, LLC
f/k/a Relational Funding Corporation (Relational) and ProQuest LLC (formerly known as
ProQuest-CSA LLC) (CSA) relating to certain obligations regarding the capital and operating
leases for certain property and equipment used at our facilities at 777 Eisenhower Parkway (the
777 Facility) and 789 Eisenhower Parkway (the 789 Facility) in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The
aforementioned leases originated as early as fiscal 2005 with up to five year terms. Effective
January 1, 2008, we conveyed, assigned, transferred
and delivered to CSA all of our right, title and interest and benefit of certain property and
equipment. We were released from any and all obligations relating to these leases and Relational,
as lessor, consented to such assignments and releases. Due to these assignments, the write off of
certain assets and liabilities under capital leases, such as office furniture, phone and power
supply systems, and video equipment, totaled a net charge of $0.1 million in the first quarter of
2008.
34
On January 25, 2008, we entered into a series of agreements with our current landlord,
Transwestern Great Lakes, LP (Transwestern) and CSA relating to certain obligations regarding the
long term leases for the facilities in Ann Arbor, Michigan. On March 4, 2008, we paid CSA $11.0
million, a portion of which was distributed to Transwestern for termination of the lease relating
to office space at the 777 Facility. Upon the Closing Date of March 7, 2008, we were released from
any and all obligations relating to the 15 year lease we previously entered into for the 777
Facility. Through assignment, we were also released from any and all obligations relating to the
15 year lease we previously entered into for office space at the 789 Facility. We assigned all of
our rights under the lease for the 789 Facility to CSA and CSA assumed the obligations of tenant
under such lease, as amended. Transwestern, as landlord, consented to such assignment. In
connection with the termination and assignment of these long term facility leases, certain
leasehold improvements and deferred rent were written off, which
resulted in a net charge of $0.6
million in the first quarter of 2008. We recorded a total charge to expense in the first quarter
of 2008 of $11.7 million for all lease termination costs.
Net Interest Income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income totaled $1.0 million for fiscal 2008 versus $0.3 million in fiscal 2007.
On February 9, 2007, we sold PQIL and all of our remaining foreign subsidiaries to
Cambridge Scientific Abstracts, LP. We used a portion of the proceeds from that sale to pay
down all remaining debt, excluding capital leases. The result was to eliminate
interest expense associated with long-term debt other than capital leases effective February 2007.
Additionally, lower cash balances throughout the year and a change in the mix of investments and
related interest rates during 2008 relative to 2007 decreased earnings on cash balances and
investments.
35
Other Income (Expense).
We announced plans after the sale of PQBS and PQIL to transition all of our corporate
functions from the Ann Arbor headquarters to Dallas during 2007 and 2008. The transition plan was
completed by year-end 2008. From the date of the sale of PQIL in February 2007, we subleased
substantial space to the buyer of PQIL through March 2008 resulting in sublease income totaling
$4.4 million in fiscal 2007 and $0.8 million in fiscal 2008.
The Company has tax-related receivables and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies
resulting from the sale agreements with Snap-On Incorporated and Cambridge Scientific Abstracts,
LP. Foreign exchange transaction losses of $1.0 million associated with these tax liabilities have
been included in other income (expense) in fiscal 2008. Transaction gains and losses in fiscal
2007 were not material to the financial statements.
Income Tax Benefit.
In 2008, the Company attributed an income tax benefit of $1.2 million to continuing
operations. Pre-tax losses at statutory tax rates provided a tax benefit of approximately $28.9
million. The impairment charge to non-deductible goodwill did not result in a tax benefit which is
$15.1 million less than the amount expected based on the federal statutory tax rate.
Furthermore, the Company continues to maintain a valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets.
The requirement of maintaining a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets
eliminated almost all of the deferred tax benefit generated from the
$37.3 million Federal net
operating loss incurred in 2008.
In 2007, the Company attributed an income tax benefit of $12.4 million to continuing
operations. Pre-tax losses at statutory tax rates provided a tax benefit of approximately
$34.9 million. The impairment charge to non-deductible goodwill did not result in a tax
benefit which is $23.5 million less than the amount expected based on the federal statutory tax
rate.
36
The above factors are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes at statutory federal income tax rate |
|
$ |
(28.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(34.9 |
) |
Non-deductible goodwill impairment |
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
Changes in valuation allowance |
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax benefit from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(12.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2007 Compared to Fiscal Year 2006
Net Sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reading programs |
|
$ |
87.1 |
|
|
$ |
91.6 |
|
Math and science programs |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
Professional development |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
Other (primarily freight) |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
109.6 |
|
|
$ |
115.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales from continuing operations decreased $5.5 million, or 4.8%, to $109.6 million
in 2007. In 2007, the Company deferred a larger percentage of sales than in 2006 as we continue
the trend of including more service and technology in our products. On-line access and service
elements are delivered over time rather than immediately shipped to customers like printed
materials. The Company defers the revenue associated with those services and on-line access and
recognizes the revenue over the period they are delivered.
Gross Profit.
Cost of sales includes expenses to print, purchase, handle and warehouse product and to
provide services and support to customers. Gross profit decreased $4.2 million in fiscal 2007 to
$73.4 million compared to $77.6 million in fiscal 2006. Our gross profit percentage for 2007
decreased 0.4 percentage points to 67.0% compared to 67.4% for 2006. The decrease is primarily
due to the deferral of a larger percentage of sales in 2007 versus 2006, which reduced net
sales but did not have an offsetting and corresponding decrease in cost of sales. The higher
deferral percentages are primarily due to increased revenue attributed to our online materials,
which are recognized over the period access is provided.
37
Research and Development.
Research and development expenditures include costs to research, evaluate and develop
educational products, net of capitalization. Research and development expense for fiscal 2007
decreased by $0.7 million to $4.5 million compared to $5.2 million for fiscal 2006, but remained
flat as a percentage of revenues representing 4.1% of revenues in fiscal 2007 versus 4.5% in fiscal
2006.
Sales and Marketing.
Sales and marketing expenditures include all costs related to selling efforts and marketing
costs. Sales and marketing expense for fiscal 2007 increased $2.0 million to $29.6 million in 2007
compared to $27.6 million in fiscal 2006 due to increased investment in the sales force.
General and Administrative.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VED |
|
$ |
19.2 |
|
|
$ |
18.9 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
46.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
53.3 |
|
|
$ |
65.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses decreased $11.8 million, or 18.1%, to $53.3 million
compared to fiscal 2006. General and administrative activities include $34.1 million in fiscal
2007 and $46.2 million in fiscal 2006 related to activities based in Ann Arbor, Michigan required
to finalize the restatement and SEC filing efforts, transition the corporate office to Dallas,
Texas, and complete the sale of PQIL. General and administrative expenses decreased in 2008 as the
efforts to complete the restatement and get current on SEC filings were reduced in 2007. The
efforts to transition the corporate office were completed in 2008.
Net Interest Income (Expense).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
Debt |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
(28.1 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
(27.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
Net interest income (expense) totaled $0.3 million in fiscal 2007 versus $(27.5) million in
fiscal 2006. On November 28, 2006, we sold PQBS to Snap-on Incorporated and used the proceeds to
reduce outstanding debt. In December 2006, we announced the sale of PQIL including all remaining
foreign subsidiaries to Cambridge Scientific Abstracts, LP. This sale closed on February 9, 2007,
and we used a portion of the proceeds from that sale to pay off all remaining debt, excluding
capital leases. The result of this activity was to eliminate interest expense associated with
long-term debt other than capital leases effective February 2007. Additionally, higher cash
balances during 2007, primarily as a result of the proceeds, increased earnings on cash balances
and investments.
Income Tax Benefit.
In 2006, the Company attributed an income tax benefit of $64.1 million to continuing
operations. Pre-tax losses at statutory tax rates provided a tax benefit of approximately $39.9
million. The VEL impairment charge to non-deductible goodwill did not result in a tax benefit
which is $14.9 million less than the amount expected based on the federal statutory tax rate.
During 2006 PQIL transferred its investment in VEL to VLC. The Company recognized a tax benefit,
net of valuation allowance, of approximately $37.5 million because the Company expected to realize
a tax loss and recover a portion of its investments in VEL when PQIL left the U.S. consolidated
group in fiscal 2007.
Discontinued Operations.
In December 2006, we announced the sale of our PQIL businesses. The sale was completed in
February 2007 for $195.2
million after final adjustments for working capital and assumed liabilities. Accordingly, the
operating results of the PQIL businesses have been segregated from our continuing operations and
reported as earnings from discontinued operations in our Consolidated
Statements of Operations for fiscal years ended December 30,
2006 and December 29, 2007. We recognized a gain on the sale of discontinued operations of $46.6 million (net of
tax) due to the sale of PQIL in fiscal 2007.
On November 28, 2006, we sold our PQBS businesses to Snap-on Incorporated for $514 million and
the assumption of approximately $19 million of debt by Snap-on. Accordingly, the operating results
of the PQBS businesses have been segregated from our continuing operations and reported as earnings
from discontinued operations. We recognized a gain on the sale of discontinued operations of
$347.7 million (net of tax) due to the sale of PQBS in fiscal 2006.
39
Goodwill Impairment.
For fiscal 2006, we performed our annual impairment testing of goodwill and impairment testing
of long-lived assets as of December 30, 2006. As a result of this testing, we recorded impairment
to goodwill of VED totaling $42.5 million. In conducting our annual goodwill impairment testing, we
compared the book value of goodwill attributed to VED with the estimated fair market value of VED
using revenue and EBITDA multiples of publicly traded comparable companies. These estimates of fair
market are dependent on multiple assumptions, estimates and inputs including: market prices of
securities in general, prevailing interest rates, industry fundamentals including the state of
educational funding, and the actual performance and future projections of the Company. As of year
end 2006, the estimated fair market value of VED was estimated to have fallen below the book value
as a result of multiple factors including: a more competitive environment, the need to invest in
redesigning older products and to introduce new products, the need to improve customer retention,
sales declines in certain key products, the loss of several significant customers, and lower actual
performance and future projections than were made at the time of acquisition of Voyager.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2008, the Company does not have any debt with the exception of certain
capital leases. Cash and cash
equivalents increased to $67.3 million at December 31, 2008 compared to $53.9 million at December
29, 2007.
In 2008, cash provided from operating activities was $31.2 million. Cash from operating
activities included the receipt of a federal tax refund of $44.1 million and the payment of $11
million to terminate the Ann Arbor office space lease. During 2008, we continued to incur
significant expenditures related to personnel and activities based in Ann Arbor, Michigan required
to finalize past due financial reporting and transition the corporate office to Dallas, Texas, as
well as contributions made to legacy employee benefit plans.
Cash from continuing operations is seasonal with more cash generated in the second half of the
year than in the first half of the year. Cash is historically generated during the second half of
the year because the buying cycle of school districts generally starts at the beginning of each new
school year in the fall.
40
Other significant uses of cash for continuing operations during fiscal 2008 included:
|
|
|
$9.6 million of net purchases of marketable securities |
|
|
|
$7.9 million of expenditures related to property, plant, equipment, curriculum
development costs, and software; and |
|
|
|
$0.3 million for principal payments on capital leases. |
Capital Expenditures and Outlook
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curriculum development costs |
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed capital |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenditures for property,
equipment, curriculum
development costs, and software |
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
|
$ |
14.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relative to 2008, capital spending in 2009 is expected to decline slightly. Capital expenditures
for 2009 will be concentrated primarily on ongoing and new product development which management
believes will generate future sales growth.
As of January 31, 2009, we have cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments totaling
$63.1 million with no outstanding debt. During the fourth quarter of 2008, we provided an
opportunity for participants in our replacement benefit plan (RBP) and our defined benefit
pension plan to receive a discounted lump sum distribution to settle retirement obligations. We
paid cash out $7.9 million in January 2009 related to these lump sum payments. Additionally, in
January 2009, we escrowed $4 million under the terms of the agreement in principle
to settle the consolidated shareholder securities class action lawsuit.
We believe that current cash, cash equivalents and short term investment balances, expected
income tax refunds, and cash generated from operations will be adequate to fund the working capital
and capital expenditures necessary to support our currently expected sales for the foreseeable
future.
41
Commitments and Contractual Obligations
We have various contractual obligations which are recorded as liabilities in our Consolidated
Financial Statements. Other items, such as certain purchase commitments and other executory
contracts are not recognized as liabilities in our Consolidated Financial Statements but are
required to be disclosed.
The following table summarizes our significant operational and contractual obligations and
commercial commitments at December 31, 2008 showing the future periods in which such obligations
are expected to be settled in cash:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Total |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 & 2011 |
|
|
2012 & 2013 |
|
|
After 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligation as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligation as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
As
of December 31, 2008, we also have $16.9 million in obligations with respect to our pension and post-retirement
medical benefit plans. For further information see Note 13 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements included herein.
We have letters of credit in the amount of $1.1 million outstanding as of December 31, 2008 to
support workers compensation insurance coverage as well as collateral for the Companys credit
card and Automated Clearinghouse (ACH) programs.
As of December 31, 2008, the Company had approximately $0.6 million of long-term income tax
liabilities that have a high degree of uncertainty regarding the timing of the future cash
outflows. The Company is unable to reasonably estimate the years when settlement will occur with
the respective tax authorities.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
The
Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are
reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on the
Companys financial condition, changes in financial conditions,
revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital
expenditures or capital resources.
Recently Issued Financial Accounting Standards
Information regarding recently issued accounting standards is included in Note 1 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements, which is included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
42
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Interest Rate Risk
The Company does not have material interest rate risk. As of December 31, 2008, the Company
does not have any interest rate forwards or option contracts outstanding.
Foreign Currency Risk
The Company does not have material exposure to changes in foreign currency rates. As of
December 31, 2008, the Company does not have any outstanding foreign currency forwards or option
contracts.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Voyager Learning Company
We have audited Voyager Learning Company and subsidiaries (the Company) internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 based on criteria established in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting included in the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal
control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating
the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit
also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
43
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2008 and
December 29, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity and
comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the fiscal years then ended, and our report dated
March 5, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and
related financial statement schedule.
/s/ Whitley Penn LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 5, 2009
44
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Voyager Learning Company
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Voyager Learning Company and
subsidiaries (the Company), as of December 31, 2008 and December 29, 2007, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity and comprehensive income (loss), and
cash flows for the fiscal years then ended. In connection with our audits of the consolidated
financial statements, we have also audited financial statement schedule II. The Companys
management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement
schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Our
audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company, as of
December 31, 2008 and December 29, 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows
for the fiscal years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
As described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted FASB
Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
an Interpretation of FASB No. 109, effective as of December 31, 2006.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2008, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated March 5,
2009 expressed an unqualified opinion.
/s/ Whitley Penn LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 5, 2009
45
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of
Directors and Shareholders of Voyager Learning Company
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated statement of operations,
shareholders equity (deficit) and
comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows of Voyager Learning Company (formerly known as ProQuest Company)
(the Company) and subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2006. In connection with our audit of the
consolidated financial statements, we have also audited financial statement schedule II for the
fiscal year ended December 30, 2006. These consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of
Voyager Learning Company and subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended
December 30, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our
opinion, the related financial statement schedule for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2006, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of
accounting for share-based payments in 2006.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Detroit, Michigan
September 17, 2008
46
Voyager Learning Company and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
98,531 |
|
|
$ |
109,612 |
|
|
$ |
115,051 |
|
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown
separately below) |
|
|
(35,939 |
) |
|
|
(36,192 |
) |
|
|
(37,417 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
62,592 |
|
|
|
73,420 |
|
|
|
77,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expense |
|
|
(5,302 |
) |
|
|
(4,532 |
) |
|
|
(5,198 |
) |
Sales and marketing expense |
|
|
(33,734 |
) |
|
|
(29,587 |
) |
|
|
(27,614 |
) |
General and administrative expense |
|
|
(30,660 |
) |
|
|
(53,280 |
) |
|
|
(65,081 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
(21,358 |
) |
|
|
(23,190 |
) |
|
|
(23,865 |
) |
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
(43,141 |
) |
|
|
(67,232 |
) |
|
|
(42,496 |
) |
Lease termination costs |
|
|
(11,673 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before interest, other income (expense)
and income taxes |
|
|
(83,276 |
) |
|
|
(104,401 |
) |
|
|
(86,620 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
1,485 |
|
|
|
3,682 |
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(510 |
) |
|
|
(3,347 |
) |
|
|
(28,544 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
(27,464 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
4,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before
income taxes |
|
|
(82,664 |
) |
|
|
(99,658 |
) |
|
|
(114,084 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
|
12,396 |
|
|
|
64,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(81,504 |
) |
|
|
(87,262 |
) |
|
|
(50,021 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations (less applicable
income tax expense of $0, $1,491, and $23,776, respectively) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,460 |
|
|
|
44,926 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations (less applicable
income tax expense of $0, $11,160, and $66,321, respectively) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,572 |
|
|
|
347,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
(81,504 |
) |
|
$ |
(35,230 |
) |
|
$ |
342,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(2.73 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.92 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.68 |
) |
Earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
1.51 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.56 |
|
|
|
11.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net earnings (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
(2.73 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.18 |
) |
|
$ |
11.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(2.73 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.92 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.68 |
) |
Earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
1.51 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.56 |
|
|
|
11.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net earnings (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
(2.73 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.18 |
) |
|
$ |
11.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of common shares and equivalents outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
29,871 |
|
|
|
29,858 |
|
|
|
29,816 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
29,871 |
|
|
|
29,858 |
|
|
|
29,816 |
|
The accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these
statements.
47
Voyager Learning Company and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of December 31, 2008 and December 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
67,302 |
|
|
$ |
53,868 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
7,371 |
|
|
|
9,266 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
19,782 |
|
|
|
65,600 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
15,196 |
|
|
|
16,005 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
33,826 |
|
|
|
16,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
143,477 |
|
|
|
161,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, equipment, and software at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
10,666 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
4,707 |
|
|
|
5,975 |
|
Software |
|
|
10,616 |
|
|
|
7,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, equipment, and software at cost |
|
|
16,543 |
|
|
|
23,925 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(9,718 |
) |
|
|
(8,584 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, equipment, and software |
|
|
6,825 |
|
|
|
15,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
99,717 |
|
|
|
142,858 |
|
Acquired curriculum intangibles, net |
|
|
38,594 |
|
|
|
51,206 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
5,218 |
|
|
|
6,411 |
|
Developed curriculum, net |
|
|
8,903 |
|
|
|
9,333 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
16,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
304,097 |
|
|
$ |
402,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these
statements.
48
Voyager Learning Company and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of December 31, 2008 and December 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
$ |
789 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
1,962 |
|
|
|
4,403 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
40,866 |
|
|
|
25,315 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
27,917 |
|
|
|
19,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
70,894 |
|
|
|
50,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations, less current maturities |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
20,348 |
|
|
|
61,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
20,444 |
|
|
|
62,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock ($.001 par value, 50,000 shares authorized,
30,550 shares issued and 29,874 shares outstanding at
the end of fiscal 2008, and 30,552 shares issued and
29,883 shares outstanding at the end of fiscal 2007) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Capital surplus |
|
|
357,741 |
|
|
|
356,683 |
|
Accumulated earnings (deficit) |
|
|
(129,227 |
) |
|
|
(47,723 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost (676 shares at the end of fiscal 2008
and 669 shares at the end of fiscal 2007) |
|
|
(16,836 |
) |
|
|
(16,742 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and postretirement plans, net of tax benefit of $713 in each year |
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
(2,088 |
) |
Net unrealized gain (loss) on securities, net of tax expense of $39 in each year |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
(1,918 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
212,759 |
|
|
|
290,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
304,097 |
|
|
$ |
402,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these
statements.
49
Voyager Learning Company and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
(81,504 |
) |
|
$ |
(35,230 |
) |
|
$ |
342,613 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss)
to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and long-lived asset impairment |
|
|
43,141 |
|
|
|
67,232 |
|
|
|
42,496 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,572 |
) |
|
|
(347,708 |
) |
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,460 |
) |
|
|
(44,926 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
21,358 |
|
|
|
23,190 |
|
|
|
23,865 |
|
Amortization and write-off of deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,286 |
|
|
|
9,003 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
4,309 |
|
Excess tax benefit realized related to stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
Gain on sale of available for sale securities |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(508 |
) |
|
|
(405 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(1,176 |
) |
|
|
(12,671 |
) |
|
|
(64,105 |
) |
Non-cash lease termination costs |
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
1,895 |
|
|
|
6,067 |
|
|
|
(3,286 |
) |
Tax receivable |
|
|
45,818 |
|
|
|
(55,742 |
) |
|
|
9,009 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
(3,404 |
) |
|
|
371 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
6,866 |
|
|
|
52,009 |
|
|
|
2,890 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(1,205 |
) |
|
|
(14,970 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(2,441 |
) |
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
(2,295 |
) |
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(9,038 |
) |
|
|
(61,113 |
) |
|
|
(3,623 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
8,367 |
|
|
|
3,385 |
|
|
|
3,685 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
(4,353 |
) |
|
|
(15,217 |
) |
|
|
32,455 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing
operations |
|
|
31,224 |
|
|
|
(82,159 |
) |
|
|
(10,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for property, equipment,
curriculum development costs, and software |
|
|
(7,912 |
) |
|
|
(8,755 |
) |
|
|
(14,408 |
) |
Purchases of equity investments available for sale |
|
|
(11,786 |
) |
|
|
(7,777 |
) |
|
|
(6,664 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of equity investments available for sale |
|
|
2,172 |
|
|
|
8,843 |
|
|
|
11,521 |
|
Proceeds from (expenditures associated with) sale of
discontinued operations, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
186,342 |
|
|
|
501,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing
operations |
|
|
(17,526 |
) |
|
|
178,653 |
|
|
|
491,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
561,059 |
|
Repayment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58,225 |
) |
|
|
(1,015,798 |
) |
Principal payments under capital lease obligations |
|
|
(264 |
) |
|
|
(840 |
) |
|
|
(746 |
) |
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
|
(8,379 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589 |
|
Excess tax benefit realized related to stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities of continuing operations |
|
|
(264 |
) |
|
|
(59,367 |
) |
|
|
(463,183 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations |
|
|
13,434 |
|
|
|
37,127 |
|
|
|
10,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,891 |
) |
|
|
66,716 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,540 |
) |
|
|
(47,510 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(730 |
) |
|
|
(20,763 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,161 |
) |
|
|
(1,557 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
13,434 |
|
|
|
13,966 |
|
|
|
8,945 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
53,868 |
|
|
|
39,902 |
|
|
|
30,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
|
$ |
67,302 |
|
|
$ |
53,868 |
|
|
$ |
39,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash financing and investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of equipment through capital leases |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,937 |
|
The accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these
statements.
50
Voyager Learning Company and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity (Deficit) and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, December 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
on Restricted |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars and shares in thousands) |
|
Issued |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Surplus |
|
|
stock |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Income(Loss) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at the end of fiscal 2005
(Common stock, 30,563 shares issued;
treasury stock, 653 shares) |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
(16,550 |
) |
|
$ |
354,879 |
|
|
$ |
(3,122 |
) |
|
$ |
(375,986 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,698 |
) |
|
$ |
(48,447 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342,613 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments (net
of tax expense of $2,739) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,292 |
|
|
|
14,292 |
|
Pension and postretirement plans (net of tax
expense
of $7,059) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,163 |
) |
|
|
(6,163 |
) |
Unrealized gain on securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adoption of SFAS 158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
(193 |
) |
Restricted stock grant, 2 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock amortization, net of cancellations, 29 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,259 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,050 |
|
Stock options exercised, net 29 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589 |
|
Reclassification of unearned compensation on restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,062 |
) |
|
|
3,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock utilized to pay taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at the end of fiscal 2006
(Common stock, 30,565 shares issued;
treasury stock, 655 shares) |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
(16,577 |
) |
|
$ |
356,655 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(33,373 |
) |
|
$ |
259 |
|
|
$ |
306,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,230 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,313 |
) |
|
|
(1,313 |
) |
Pension and postretirement plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
Unrealized loss on securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,015 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adoption of FIN 48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,880 |
|
Write off foreign currency translation adjustments upon sale of PQIL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,676 |
) |
|
|
(24,676 |
) |
Write off accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to PQIL pension plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,284 |
|
|
|
23,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock amortization, net of cancellations, 13 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
369 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(506 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(506 |
) |
Restricted stock utilized to pay taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at the end of fiscal 2007
(Common stock, 30,552 shares issued;
treasury stock, 669 shares) |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
(16,742 |
) |
|
$ |
356,683 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(47,723 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,918 |
) |
|
$ |
290,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81,504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81,504 |
) |
Pension and postretirement plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,181 |
|
|
|
3,181 |
|
Unrealized loss on securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
854 |
|
Restricted stock utilized to pay taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at the end of fiscal 2008
(Common stock, 30,550 shares issued;
treasury stock, 676 shares) |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
(16,836 |
) |
|
$ |
357,741 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(129,227 |
) |
|
$ |
1,051 |
|
|
$ |
212,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these
statements.
51
Voyager Learning Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations. Voyager Learning Company and Subsidiaries (collectively the
Company) is a leading provider of results-driven reading and math intervention programs,
professional development programs regarding the teaching of reading, subscription-based online
supplemental reading, math and science resources and programs, and a core reading program for
school districts throughout the U.S.
Our reading programs include: Voyager Passport, a comprehensive reading intervention system
for K-5; Voyager Universal Literacy System®, a K-3 core reading program; Passport Reading
Journeys, a middle school reading intervention system for grades 6-9; TimeWarp® Plus, a K-9 summer
school reading intervention program; Voyager Pasaporte, a K-3 reading intervention system in
Spanish; and Learning A-Z, a group of related websites known as Reading A-Z, Raz-Kids,
Reading-tutors, Vocabulary A-Z, and Writing A-Z which provide online supplemental reading,
writing and vocabulary lessons, books, and other resources for students and teachers.
Our math and science programs include: Vmath®, a math intervention system for grades 3-8;
ExploreLearning, a subscription-based online library of interactive simulations in math and
science for grades 3-12; and Science A-Z, a Learning A-Z website aimed at the supplemental science
market.
VoyagerU® is our professional development program for teachers, literacy coaches and
administrators.
The Company has been a leading publisher of solutions for the education, automotive and power
equipment markets. In 2005, we acquired Voyager Expanded Learning (VEL). In 2007, we changed
our name to Voyager Learning Company.
The Company had provided products and services to our customers through three business
segments. With the sale of ProQuest Business Solutions (PQBS) on November 28, 2006 and the sale
of ProQuest Information and Learning (PQIL) on February 9, 2007, we now provide products and
services to our customers through one business segment, Voyager Education (VED).
52
Reclassifications. Certain reclassifications to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for all prior periods presented have been made to conform to the 2008 presentation. In prior
years, the Company included amortization of its acquired and developed curriculum and certain other
operational assets in Cost of Sales. In the current year presentation, all depreciation and
amortization for the periods presented herein has been segregated and shown as a separate line item
on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Also, in prior years, the Company included a line item in its Consolidated Financial
Statements entitled selling and administrative expense. In the current year presentation, amounts
previously included in this line item have been reclassified into the line items sales and
marketing expense, general and administrative expense, or depreciation and amortization expense. A
summary of the impact of these conforming reclassifications on previously filed results is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 in |
|
|
2006 as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 in |
|
|
|
Originally |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Year |
|
|
Originally |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Year |
|
|
|
Filed |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Presentation |
|
|
Filed |
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
Presentation |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
(55,720 |
) |
|
$ |
19,528 |
|
|
$ |
(36,192 |
) |
|
$ |
(57,279 |
) |
|
$ |
19,862 |
|
|
$ |
(37,417 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
|
53,892 |
|
|
|
19,528 |
|
|
|
73,420 |
|
|
|
57,772 |
|
|
|
19,862 |
|
|
|
77,634 |
|
Selling and administrative expense |
|
|
(86,529 |
) |
|
|
86,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96,698 |
) |
|
|
96,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,587 |
) |
|
|
(29,587 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,614 |
) |
|
|
(27,614 |
) |
General and administrative expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,280 |
) |
|
|
(53,280 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65,081 |
) |
|
|
(65,081 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,190 |
) |
|
|
(23,190 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,865 |
) |
|
|
(23,865 |
) |
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting periods. Subsequent actual results may differ from those estimates.
Principles of Consolidation. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the
accounts of Voyager Learning Company and its majority owned subsidiaries. All intercompany
transactions are eliminated.
Discontinued Operations. The Company considers businesses to be held for sale when
management approves and commits to a formal plan to actively market a business for sale. Upon
designation as held for sale, the carrying value of the assets of the business are recorded at the
lower of their carrying value or their estimated fair value, less costs to sell. We cease to
record depreciation and amortization expense associated with assets held for sale at that time.
On November 28, 2006, we sold our PQBS businesses to Snap-on Incorporated. In December 2006,
we announced the sale of our PQIL businesses to Cambridge Scientific Abstracts, LP. The sale was
completed on February 9, 2007. The operating results and the gain on sale of PQBS and PQIL have
been segregated from our continuing operations for all periods presented in our Consolidated
Financial Statements and are separately reported as discontinued operations (see Note 4 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements included herein for additional information on discontinued
operations).
53
Fiscal Year. On December 20, 2007, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted a
resolution changing the Companys fiscal year end from the Saturday nearest to December 31 to a
calendar year. This change is effective for the fiscal year ended on December 31, 2008. The
Companys fiscal 2007 year ended on December 29, 2007. The two-day transition period between
December 29, 2007 and the 2008 annual fiscal year, which began January 1, 2008, is included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008. The Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 was the first report filed by the Company for the newly
adopted fiscal year and included the two-day transition period.
Prior to fiscal 2008, our fiscal year ended on the Saturday nearest to December 31 each
calendar year. References to fiscal year 2007 or fiscal 2007 are for the 52 weeks ended December
29, 2007 and references to fiscal year 2006 or fiscal 2006 are for the 52 weeks ended December 30,
2006.
Revenue Recognition. The Company accounts for its revenues under Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition (SAB No. 104). Revenues are derived from sales of
reading, math and science, and professional development solutions to
school districts primarily in the
U.S. Sales include printed materials and often online access to educational materials for
individual students, teachers, and classrooms. Revenue from the sale of printed materials for
reading and math products is recognized when the product is shipped to or received by the customer.
Revenue for product support, implementation services, and online subscriptions is recognized over
the period services are delivered. The division of revenue between shipped materials, online
materials, and ongoing support and services is determined in accordance with Emerging Issues Task
Force 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables (EITF 00-21). Revenue for our
professional development courses, which includes an internet delivery component, is recognized over
the contractual delivery period, typically nine to twelve months. Revenue for the online content
sold separately or included with our curriculum materials, is recognized ratably over the access
period, typically a school year. Shipments to school book depositories are on consignment and
revenue is recognized based on shipments from the depositories to the schools.
ExploreLearning and Learning A-Z derive revenue exclusively from sales of online subscriptions
to reading, math and science teaching materials. Typically, the subscriptions are for a 12 month
period and the revenue is recognized ratably over the
period the online access is available to the customer.
54
The amount of service revenues are less than 10% of total revenues for all periods presented.
For our discontinued operations, PQILs published products provided users with access to
comprehensive databases, including historical newspapers, Early English Books Online (EEBO),
e-dissertations, and topic specific products on either a subscription basis that normally covers
twelve months, or through a perpetual access license. PQIL followed the guidance under SAB No. 104
for all subscription products. Revenue from subscription agreements was recognized ratably over
the term of the subscription, including any free before or after periods, using the straight-line
method. For sales of perpetual access licenses, revenue was recognized over the greater of one
year or the applicable period if the perpetual access license was associated with a subscription or
data access agreement.
Accounts Receivable. Accounts receivable are stated net of allowances for doubtful
accounts and estimated sales returns. The allowance for doubtful accounts and estimated sales
returns totaled $0.7 million and $1.3 million at year end 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
allowance for doubtful accounts is based on a review of the outstanding balances and historical
collection experience. The allowance for sales returns is based on historical rates of return.
Foreign Currency Translation. The financial position and results of operations of
each of our foreign subsidiaries which are included in discontinued operations, are measured using
the local currency as the functional currency. Revenues and expenses are translated at average
exchange rates prevailing during the respective fiscal periods. Assets and liabilities are
translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rates at the end of the respective fiscal periods.
Balance sheet translation adjustments arising from differences in exchange rates from period to
period are included in the determination of our other comprehensive income (loss) which is
reflected as a component of shareholders equity.
55
Net Earnings (Loss) per Common Share. Basic net earnings/ (loss) per common share are
computed by dividing net earnings/ (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted net earnings/(loss) per common share is computed by
dividing net earnings/(loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
period, including the potential dilution that could occur if all of our outstanding stock awards
that are in-the-money were exercised, using the treasury stock method. A reconciliation of the
weighted average number of common shares and equivalents outstanding used in the calculation of
basic and diluted net earnings per common share are shown in the table below for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Shares in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
29,871 |
|
|
|
29,858 |
|
|
|
29,816 |
|
Dilutive effect of awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
29,871 |
|
|
|
29,858 |
|
|
|
29,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following were not included in the computation of diluted net income per share because
their effect would have been antidilutive: options to purchase shares
of 0.9 million, 1.4 million,
and 3.0 million for fiscal years 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively; nonvested restricted stock of
zero, 16,000, and 85,000 for fiscal years 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively; and a stock
appreciation right with respect to 0.3 million shares in fiscal years 2008 and 2007.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. We consider all highly liquid investments with maturities
of three months or less (when purchased) to be cash equivalents. The carrying amount reported in
the Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair value.
Inventory. Inventory costs include material only. Inventory is stated at the lower
of cost, determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method, or market. Where appropriate, a
valuation reserve has been recorded to reduce slow-moving or obsolete inventory to net realizable
value.
Property and Equipment. Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed over the assets estimated useful lives
using the straight-line method. Estimated lives range from three to five years for office and
computer equipment, five to seven years for furniture and fixtures, and fourteen to eighteen years
in fiscal 2007 and four to five years in fiscal 2008 for buildings and leasehold improvements.
Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed based on the shorter of the assets estimated
useful lives or the lease term. Expenditures for
maintenance and repairs, as well as minor renewals, are charged to operations as incurred, while
betterments and major renewals are capitalized. Any gain or loss resulting from the retirement or
sale of an asset is credited or charged to operations.
56
We recognized depreciation and amortization expense on property and equipment of $1.3 million,
$2.3 million and $2.1 million for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Purchased and Developed Software. Purchased and developed software includes the costs
to purchase third party software and to develop internal-use software. Amortization of purchased
software costs in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 totaled $0.4 million, $0.5 million, and $0.7 million,
respectively. The Company follows the guidance in Statement of Position No. 98-1, Accounting for
the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use (SOP 98-1) for
capitalizing software projects. Software costs are amortized over the expected economic life of
the product, generally three to five years. Amortization of developed software costs in fiscal
2008, 2007 and 2006 totaled $1.8 million, $1.0 million, and $0.5 million, respectively. At
December 31, 2008 and 2007, unamortized capitalized software was $4.6 million and $3.2 million,
respectively, which included zero or immaterial amounts of software under development.
Acquired Curriculum. Acquired curriculum represents curriculum acquired in the
acquisitions of VEL and ExploreLearning in 2005 and Learning A-Z in 2004 and is the initial
purchase accounting value placed on the past development and refinement of the core methodologies,
processes and measurement techniques by which VED structures curriculum. Acquired curriculum is
being amortized using an accelerated method over ten years, as it has an economic benefit declining
over the estimated useful life. Acquired curriculum is presented net of accumulated amortization
of $59.8 million and $47.2 million as of fiscal year end 2008 and 2007, respectively. Amortization
of acquired curriculum for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $12.6 million, $14.4 million and $16.2
million, respectively.
Developed Curriculum. We capitalize certain pre-publication costs of our curriculum
including art, prepress, editorial, and other costs incurred in the creation of the master copy of
our curriculum products. Curriculum development costs are amortized over the expected life of the
education program, generally on a straight-line basis over a period of
three to five years. We periodically review the recoverability of the capitalized costs based
on expected net realizable value, and generally retire the assets once fully depreciated.
Developed curriculum costs are presented net of accumulated amortization of $5.3 million and $6.0
million as of fiscal year end 2008 and 2007, respectively. Amortization of curriculum development
costs for fiscal year 2008, 2007, and 2006 was $4.1 million, $3.1 million, and $2.2 million,
respectively.
57
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Goodwill and other intangible assets are
related to the acquisitions of VEL and ExploreLearning in 2005 and Learning A-Z in 2004. Other
intangible assets include trade names/trademarks and customer relationships, which are being
amortized on a straight-line basis over estimated lives ranging from five to ten years, and
non-compete agreements, which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their contractual
lives ranging from one to five years. Amortization of other intangible assets in fiscal 2008,
2007, and 2006 was $1.2 million, $1.9 million, and $2.2 million, respectively. Other intangible
assets are presented net of accumulated amortization.
See Note 5 herein for further discussion of our review of Goodwill and the related impairment
charge recognized in fiscal 2008.
Impairment of Long Lived Assets. We review the carrying value of long lived assets
for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate net book value may not be
recoverable from the estimated undiscounted future cash flows, which is based on the requirements
of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No. 144). If our review indicates any assets are impaired,
the impairment of those assets is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the
fair value as estimated by discounted cash flows. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the
lower of the carrying amount or fair value less cost of disposal. The determination whether these
assets are impaired involves significant judgment based on projections of future performance. For
fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, no impairment was indicated.
Deferred Costs. Certain up-front costs associated with completing the sale of the
Companys products are deferred and recognized as the related revenue is recognized.
Shipping and Handling Costs. All amounts billed to customers in a sales transaction
for shipping and handling are classified as revenue. Shipping and handling costs incurred by the
Company are included in cost of sales.
58
Advertising Costs. The Company, from time to time, ships products to prospective
customers as samples. Samples costs are expensed upon shipment and totaled $2.1 million, $1.6
million, and $0.8 million in 2008, 2007, and 2006 respectively. Other costs of advertising, which
include advertising, print, and photography expenses, are expensed as incurred and totaled $1.1
million, $0.7 million, and $0.3 million in 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
Income Taxes. Provision is made for the expense, or benefit, associated with taxes
based on income. The provision for income taxes is based on laws currently enacted in every
jurisdiction in which we do business and considers laws mitigating the taxation of the same income
by more than one jurisdiction. Significant judgment is required in determining income tax expense,
current tax receivables and payables, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and valuation allowance
recorded against the net deferred tax assets. Management considers the scheduled reversal of
deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, taxable income in prior carryback years,
loss carryforward limitations, and tax planning strategies in assessing whether deferred tax assets
will be realized in future periods. If, after consideration of these factors, management believes
it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a
valuation allowance is established. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable
could be reduced if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced.
Effective December 31, 2006, we adopted Financial Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48) and account for liabilities related to uncertain tax
positions in accordance with its provisions.
Sales Taxes. The Company reports sales taxes collected from customers and remitted to
governmental authorities on a net basis. Sales tax collected from customers is excluded from
revenues. Collected but unremitted sales tax is included as part of accounts payable in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Stock-Based Compensation. Prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for our stock option
plan using the intrinsic value
method prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees (APB No. 25), as allowed by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-based Compensation
(SFAS No. 123). No stock-based compensation expense was recognized in the income statement
related to stock options as all options granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of
the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Restricted stock grants were valued at the
market price on the award dates and recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period.
59
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123R), which requires all share-based payments to be recognized in the income statement
based on their fair values. We adopted this statement using the modified prospective method in
which compensation cost is recognized based on the requirements of SFAS No.123R for all share-based
payments granted after the effective date and for all awards granted prior to the effective date
that remain unvested on the effective date. Compensation costs for awards with graded vesting are
recognized on a straight-line basis over the anticipated vesting period.
Foreign Exchange Risks. Historically, a portion of revenue, earnings, and net
investment in foreign affiliates has been exposed to changes in foreign exchange rates, primarily
related to the discontinued operations. Substantially all foreign exchange risks are managed
through operational means. However, we believe that from time to time some foreign exchange risks
related to certain transactions are better managed by utilizing foreign currency forwards or option
contracts. These contracts are reported at fair value and any changes in fair value are recognized
currently in earnings. These contracts are not designated for hedging treatment under SFAS No.
133, as amended. We did not have any foreign currency forwards or option contracts outstanding at
December 31, 2008 or December 29, 2007.
Recently Issued Financial Accounting Standards. In April 2008, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 142-3, Determination of the
Useful Life of Intangible Assets (FAS 142-3). FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. FAS 142-3
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and early adoption is
prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that FAS 142-3 will have
on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
60
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51, (SFAS No. 160). Currently, the Company does
not have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries, nor does it
deconsolidate any subsidiaries. SFAS No. 160 will be effective for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company does not
expect the adoption of SFAS No. 160 to have a material effect on the Companys consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised), Business Combinations (SFAS No.
141R). SFAS No. 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer accounts for
business combinations. SFAS No. 141R includes guidance for the recognition and measurement of the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling or minority interest
in the acquiree. It also provides guidance for the measurement of goodwill, the recognition of
contingent consideration, the accounting for pre-acquisition gain and loss contingencies and
acquisition-related transaction costs, and the recognition of changes in the acquirers income tax
valuation allowance. SFAS No. 141R should be applied prospectively and is effective for business
combinations made by the Company beginning January 1, 2009.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of SFAS No. 115 (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159
permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and other items at fair value.
Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected would be
recognized in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. Generally, the fair value option may be
applied instrument by instrument and is irrevocable unless a new election date occurs. SFAS No.
159 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007,
with earlier adoption permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal year that begins on or before
November 15, 2007. On January 1, 2008, the Company did not elect to apply the provisions of SFAS
No. 159 to financial assets and liabilities.
61
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Pension
and Other Postretirement Plans an amendment of SFASs No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R), (SFAS No.
158). SFAS No. 158 requires the recognition of the funded status of a benefit plan in the
statement of financial position. It also requires the recognition as a component of other
comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise
during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost pursuant to
SFAS No. 87, Employers Accounting for Pensions (SFAS No. 87) or SFAS No. 106, Employers
Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pension (SFAS No. 106). The statement also
has new provisions regarding the measurement date as well as certain disclosure requirements. The
recognition provisions of the statement were effective for our 2006 year end, and the measurement
date requirements are effective for our 2008 year end. The adoption of the recognition and
disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 158 had a minimal impact on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157), which
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures regarding fair value measurements. SFAS No.
157 does not require any new fair value measurements, but provides guidance on how to measure fair
value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify the source of the information. SFAS 157
was effective for financial assets and liabilities in fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, and is effective for nonfinancial assets and liabilities in fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2008. We adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 related to recurring
financial assets and liabilities beginning fiscal 2008. The adoption had no impact on our
consolidated financial statements. All financial assets and liabilities are valued using
level 1 inputs. The Company is currently evaluating the potential
impact of SFAS No. 157 to nonfinancial assets and liabilities on our consolidated
financial position, results of operation and cash flows.
62
Note 2 Business Segments
With the sale of PQBS in November 2006 and the sale of PQIL in February 2007, the Company had
business segments that were included in discontinued operations in prior years. Because the
Companys management approach, organizational structure, operating performance measurement and
reporting, and operational decision making are performed from a single company perspective, the
Company operates as one reportable segment within the U.S. as of February 2007, which includes all
corporate operations. The loss from continuing operations before interest, other income (expense)
and income taxes and depreciation and amortization attributable to the corporate operations
continue to be shown separately below for comparability with prior years. As the transition of
activities based in Ann Arbor, Michigan to headquarters in Dallas, TX was complete as of December
31, 2008, all assets are presented as VED for 2008.
Information concerning our operating business segments for fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006 for our
continuing operations is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
VED |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
98,531 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
98,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
before interest, other income (expense)
and income taxes |
|
$ |
(56,569 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,707 |
) |
|
$ |
(83,276 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
7,912 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
21,248 |
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
21,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
304,097 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
304,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
VED |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
109,612 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
109,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
before interest and income taxes |
|
$ |
(69,192 |
) |
|
$ |
(35,209 |
) |
|
$ |
(104,401 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
8,670 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
8,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
22,110 |
|
|
$ |
1,080 |
|
|
$ |
23,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
283,091 |
|
|
$ |
119,636 |
|
|
$ |
402,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
VED |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
115,051 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
115,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
before interest and income taxes |
|
$ |
(39,315 |
) |
|
$ |
(47,305 |
) |
|
$ |
(86,620 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
5,860 |
|
|
$ |
8,548 |
|
|
$ |
14,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
22,777 |
|
|
$ |
1,088 |
|
|
$ |
23,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets (1) |
|
$ |
322,131 |
|
|
$ |
150,085 |
|
|
$ |
472,216 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total assets includes assets from continuing operations only. |
63
Note 3 Income Taxes
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes in fiscal year 2008, 2007, and 2006
were all attributable to the U.S.
Total income taxes for the fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006 were allocated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(1,160 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,396 |
) |
|
$ |
(64,063 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,491 |
|
|
|
23,776 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,160 |
|
|
|
66,321 |
|
Shareholders equity, for minimum pension liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,059 |
|
Shareholders equity, for currency translation
adjustment on unremitted foreign earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,739 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
Long-lived intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,160 |
) |
|
$ |
255 |
|
|
$ |
35,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense attributable to income from continuing operations in fiscal 2008, 2007, and
2006 included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax expense (benefit): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States federal |
|
$ |
(222 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
State and local |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax expense |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States federal |
|
|
(832 |
) |
|
|
(12,183 |
) |
|
|
(62,268 |
) |
State and local |
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
(488 |
) |
|
|
(1,837 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
|
(1,176 |
) |
|
|
(12,671 |
) |
|
|
(64,105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit |
|
$ |
(1,160 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,396 |
) |
|
$ |
(64,063 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The significant components of deferred income tax expense (benefit) attributable to loss from
continuing operations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit, exclusive of
item listed below: |
|
$ |
(1,176 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,692 |
) |
|
$ |
(45,829 |
) |
Benefits of gain from sale and discontinued
operations allocated to continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,979 |
) |
|
|
(18,276 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
$ |
(1,176 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,671 |
) |
|
$ |
(64,105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
Reconciliation of income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations and the domestic
federal statutory income tax expense (benefit) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory federal income tax rate |
|
$ |
(28,932 |
) |
|
$ |
(34,880 |
) |
|
$ |
(39,930 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (reduction) in taxes resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefit |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
(1,795 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change of intent for investment basis
difference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,525 |
) |
Non-deductible goodwill |
|
|
15,099 |
|
|
|
23,531 |
|
|
|
14,874 |
|
Changes in valuation allowance |
|
|
13,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
(833 |
) |
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit |
|
$ |
(1,160 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,396 |
) |
|
$ |
(64,063 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes are primarily provided for temporary differences between the financial
reporting basis and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities. The tax effects of each type of
temporary difference and carryforward (for both continuing and discontinued operations) that give
rise to a significant portion of deferred tax assets (liabilities) at the end of fiscal 2008 and
2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets are attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards |
|
$ |
13,191 |
|
|
$ |
822 |
|
Tax credit carryforwards |
|
|
8,675 |
|
|
|
10,176 |
|
Deferred compensation & pension benefits |
|
|
8,300 |
|
|
|
10,154 |
|
Legal contingency accrual, less insurance receivable |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,258 |
|
|
|
5,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets |
|
|
35,371 |
|
|
|
28,765 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(20,513 |
) |
|
|
(11,154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets |
|
|
14,858 |
|
|
|
17,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities are attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curriculum costs |
|
|
(13,057 |
) |
|
|
(17,320 |
) |
Intangibles |
|
|
(2,075 |
) |
|
|
(2,247 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(15,502 |
) |
|
|
(19,499 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset (liability) |
|
$ |
(644 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,888 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
The net deferred tax asset (liability) is classified as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term deferred tax asset |
|
$ |
1,994 |
|
|
$ |
2,566 |
|
Long-term deferred tax liability |
|
|
(2,638 |
) |
|
|
(4,454 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset (liability) |
|
$ |
(644 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,888 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net decrease in the valuation allowance in 2007 was $26.8 million. The valuation
allowance decreased during 2007 primarily as a result of selling PQIL. Deferred tax assets
associated with PQIL that had valuation allowances established on them were divested. As of
December 31, 2007, the amount of valuation allowance that existed was $11.2 million. The amount
of valuation allowance is all attributable to the US Federal and state jurisdictions. The net US
domestic deferred tax assets and liabilities before valuation allowance was approximately $9.3
million. As of December 31, 2007, there is not any amount of the valuation allowance for which
subsequently recognized benefits will be allocated to reduce goodwill or other intangible assets.
The net increase in the valuation allowance in 2008 was $9.4 million. The valuation allowance
increased during 2008 primarily because of the net operating loss generated in 2008. As of
December 31, 2008, the amount of valuation allowance that existed was $20.5 million. The amount
of valuation allowance is all attributable to the U.S. federal and state jurisdictions. The net
U.S. domestic deferred tax assets and liabilities before valuation allowance was approximately
$19.9 million. As of December 31, 2008, there is not any amount of the valuation allowance for
which subsequently recognized benefits will be allocated to reduce goodwill or other intangible
assets.
66
At December 31, 2008, the amounts and expiration dates of loss and tax credit carryforwards
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount as of year |
|
|
Expire or start expiring at |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
ended 2008 |
|
|
the end of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. net operating loss (1) |
|
$ |
37,337 |
|
|
|
2028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State net operating loss carryforward (net): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State tax net operating losses |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
2012-2028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax credits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign tax credit |
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
2011-2015 |
|
Minimum tax credit |
|
|
6,549 |
|
|
Carry forward indefinitely |
Research and development tax credit |
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
2014-2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax credits |
|
|
8,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Not subject to any annual limitation. |
Income taxes refunded, net of tax payments, were $45.9 million for fiscal year 2008. Income
taxes paid, net of refunds, for fiscal years 2007 and 2006 were
$66.6 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The Company has refunds receivable from taxing authorities of $19.8 million and
$65.6 million as of fiscal year end 2008 and 2007, respectively.
As of December 31, 2008, the Company is under examination by the IRS for fiscal years
2003-2004 and 2006-2007. The examination for fiscal years 2003-2004 has been completed by the
local IRS examination team. The income tax refunds of $9.2 million requested by the Company for
2003-2004 have been approved by the local office but are still subject to review by IRS joint
committee. These years under examination contain matters that could be subject to differing
interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations as they related to the amount, timing or
inclusion of revenue and expenses or the sustainability of income tax credits for a given audit
cycle. The Company has established a liability for those matters where it is not probable that the
position will be sustained. The amount of the liability is based on managements best estimate
given the Companys history with similar matters and interpretations of current laws and
regulations.
Under the sale agreements with Snap-On Incorporated and Cambridge Scientific Abstracts, LP
(CSA), the Company is liable to indemnify Snap-On Incorporated or CSA for any income taxes
assessed against PQBS or PQIL for periods prior to the sale of PQBS or PQIL. The Company has
established a liability for those matters where it is not probable that the position
will be sustained. The amount of the liability is based on managements best estimate given
the Companys history with similar matters and interpretations of current laws and regulations.
67
Uncertain Tax Positions
In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by
prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being
recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and
transition. FIN 48 applies to all tax positions related to income taxes.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
18,940 |
|
Increases for tax positions taken during the current period |
|
|
1,381 |
|
Decreases relating to settlements |
|
|
(623 |
) |
Decreases
relating to dispositions |
|
|
(4,909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 29, 2007 |
|
$ |
14,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increases for tax positions taken during the current period |
|
|
|
|
Decreases relating to settlements |
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
14,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recorded a decrease to its
liability for unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $0.2 million, which primarily relates to
settlement of a state income tax filing position.
Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2008 are approximately
$0.5 million of tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. Because of
the impact of deferred tax accounting and the availability of tax attributes, the majority of the
tax positions would ordinarily not affect the effective tax rate or the payment of cash to the
taxing authorities. However, due to the limited evidence to support the realization of these tax
assets a valuation allowance is required.
68
The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits and penalties as
income tax expense. Related to the unrecognized tax benefits noted above, the Company recognized
penalties of zero and immaterial amounts for interest (gross) during 2008 and, as of December 31,
2008, has a liability for penalties of zero and interest (gross) of
approximately $0.1 million.
We do not expect our unrecognized tax benefits to change significantly over the next 12
months.
The Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal
jurisdiction and various U.S. state jurisdictions. The tax years which remain subject to
examination by major tax jurisdictions as of December 31, 2008 include 2003 2007.
Note 4 Discontinued Operations
The Board determined to sell PQBS and PQIL and authorized the plan of sale in the second
quarter of 2006. On November 28, 2006, we sold PQBS to Snap-on Incorporated and used the proceeds
to reduce outstanding debt. In December 2006, we announced the sale of PQIL including all
remaining foreign subsidiaries to Cambridge Scientific Abstracts, LP. The sale of PQIL was closed
on February 9, 2007 and we used a portion of the proceeds from that sale to pay down all remaining
debt, excluding capital leases.
The operating results of these businesses have been segregated from our continuing operations.
The Consolidated Statements of Operations separately reflect the gains on sale and the earnings of
PQBS and PQIL as discontinued operations. Interest expense of zero, $0.8 million, and $18.3
million for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, was allocated to discontinued operations based on
the ratio of net assets of sold or to be sold businesses to total net assets of the consolidated
company.
69
Results from discontinued operations are shown in the tables below for the fiscal years indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended |
|
|
|
December 29, |
|
|
December 30, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales by business segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ProQuest Information and Learning |
|
$ |
26,062 |
|
|
$ |
259,103 |
|
ProQuest Business Solutions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
172,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales from discontinued operations |
|
|
26,062 |
|
|
|
431,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before interest and income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ProQuest Information and Learning |
|
|
7,798 |
|
|
|
37,591 |
|
ProQuest Business Solutions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations
before interest and income taxes |
|
|
7,798 |
|
|
|
89,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(847 |
) |
|
|
(20,422 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(1,491 |
) |
|
|
(23,776 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued
operations, net of taxes |
|
$ |
5,460 |
|
|
$ |
44,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gain on sale in fiscal years 2007 and 2006 resulting from the sale of discontinued
operations was derived as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale price |
|
$ |
195,249 |
|
|
$ |
513,986 |
|
Net assets, related liabilities, and selling costs (1) |
|
|
(137,517 |
) |
|
|
(99,957 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale |
|
|
57,732 |
|
|
|
414,029 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(11,160 |
) |
|
|
(66,321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
46,572 |
|
|
$ |
347,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net assets sold in fiscal 2007 and 2006 include goodwill of $68.0 million and $52.2
million, respectively. |
The sale of PQBS generated significant taxable income that enabled the Company to utilize
capital loss carryforwards and other tax attributes in 2006 for which the Company had previously
established valuation allowances. Therefore, the tax expense of $66.3 million for 2006 was
significantly less than the statutory tax rate because of the release of the valuation allowance on
these tax attributes.
70
Note 5 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008
and December 29, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
210,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
(67,232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2007 |
|
$ |
142,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
(43,141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
99,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, (SFAS No. 142), goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are no longer
amortized but are instead reviewed for impairment at least annually and if a triggering event is
determined to have occurred in an interim period. The Companys annual impairment testing is
performed during the fourth fiscal quarter. The first step of impairment testing for fiscal 2008
showed that the book value of the Companys single reporting unit exceeded its fair value;
therefore, a second step of testing was required under SFAS No. 142. The second step requires the
allocation of fair value of a reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that reporting
unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. The fair value was
determined using an income approach based on forecasted operating results. As a result of the
second step of our 2008 impairment test, the goodwill balance for the reporting unit as of the
measurement date was determined to be partially impaired. The estimates of fair market used in our
goodwill testing are dependent on multiple assumptions, estimates and inputs, including industry
fundamentals such as the state of educational funding and the actual performance and future
projections of the Company. As of year end 2008, the estimated fair market value of the reporting
unit was estimated to have fallen below the book value as a result of worsening and prolonged
adverse developments in the overall education funding environment, including the reductions in
Reading First funding effective 2008 and the reductions in available state and local funds. As a
result of these factors, an impairment charge of $43.1 million was recorded in 2008.
71
In conducting our annual goodwill impairment testing for fiscal 2007, we compared the book
value of goodwill attributed to VED with the estimated fair market value of VED. These estimates of
fair market are dependent on multiple assumptions and inputs, including industry fundamentals such
as the state of educational funding and the actual performance and future projections of the
Company. As of year end 2007, the estimated fair market value of VED was estimated to be less than
the book value as a result of lower future cash flow projections, driven by adverse developments in
the education funding environment at the federal and local level. An impairment charge of $67.2
million related to VED was recorded in 2007 as a result of these factors.
For fiscal 2006, the Company performed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and
impairment testing of long-lived assets as of December 30, 2006. As a result of this testing, the
Company recorded impairment to goodwill of VED totaling $42.5 million. In conducting our annual
goodwill impairment testing, we compared the book value of goodwill attributed to VED with the
estimated fair market value of VED using revenue and EBITDA multiples of publicly traded comparable
companies. These estimates of fair market are dependent on multiple assumptions and inputs
including: market prices of securities in general, prevailing interest rates, industry fundamentals
including the state of educational funding, and the actual performance and future projections of
the Company. As of year end 2006, the estimated fair market value of VED was estimated to have
fallen below the book value as a result of multiple factors including: a more competitive
environment, the need to invest in redesigning older products and to introduce new products, the
need to improve customer retention, sales declines in certain key products, the loss of several
significant customers, and lower actual performance and future projections than were made at the
time of acquisition of Voyager.
72
Our definite lived intangible assets and
related accumulated amortization at the end of fiscal 2008 and 2007
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Gross |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired curriculum |
|
$ |
98,410 |
|
|
$ |
(59,816 |
) |
|
$ |
38,594 |
|
Developed curriculum |
|
|
14,243 |
|
|
|
(5,340 |
) |
|
|
8,903 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
5,130 |
|
|
|
(2,160 |
) |
|
|
2,970 |
|
Trademark |
|
|
3,860 |
|
|
|
(1,636 |
) |
|
|
2,224 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
(357 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangibles, net |
|
$ |
122,024 |
|
|
$ |
(69,309 |
) |
|
$ |
52,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired curriculum |
|
$ |
98,410 |
|
|
$ |
(47,204 |
) |
|
$ |
51,206 |
|
Developed curriculum |
|
|
15,288 |
|
|
|
(5,955 |
) |
|
|
9,333 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
5,130 |
|
|
|
(1,614 |
) |
|
|
3,516 |
|
Trademark |
|
|
3,860 |
|
|
|
(1,224 |
) |
|
|
2,636 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
3,517 |
|
|
|
(3,258 |
) |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangibles, net |
|
$ |
126,205 |
|
|
$ |
(59,255 |
) |
|
$ |
66,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on the current amount of intangible assets subject to amortization, the estimated
amortization expense for each of the succeeding 5 years and thereafter is as follows: 2009 $15.3
million; 2010 $12.9 million; 2011 $9.7 million; 2012 $7.0 million; 2013 $4.8 million; all
years thereafter $3.0 million.
There were no intangibles acquired in 2008 or 2007.
Note 6 Other Current Assets
Other current assets at the end of fiscal 2008 and 2007 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term deferred tax asset |
|
$ |
1,994 |
|
|
$ |
2,566 |
|
Deferred costs |
|
|
1,907 |
|
|
|
1,434 |
|
Available for sale securities |
|
|
13,137 |
|
|
|
3,629 |
|
Insurance receivable |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
1,217 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,788 |
|
|
|
7,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
33,826 |
|
|
$ |
16,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities represent assets, invested in equity and fixed income
securities, held in a rabbi trust, related to executive plans, as well as
investments in short-term debt securities that will mature within one year.
73
See Note 18 for further description of the legal contingency accrual related to the putative
securities class actions and the related receivable from the Companys insurance providers. This
liability and related receivable were classified as long-term as of December 29, 2007.
Note 7 Other Assets
Other assets at the end of fiscal 2008 and 2007 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance receivable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,363 |
|
|
$ |
16,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8 Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses at the end of fiscal 2008 and 2007 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, bonuses and benefits |
|
$ |
6,900 |
|
|
$ |
8,540 |
|
Pension and post-retirement medical benefits |
|
|
6,675 |
|
|
|
2,101 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
3,233 |
|
|
|
1,590 |
|
Corporate transition costs |
|
|
1,879 |
|
|
|
2,466 |
|
Legal contingency accrual |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
5,400 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,179 |
|
|
|
5,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
40,866 |
|
|
$ |
25,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 13 for further description of our pension benefits.
See Note 16 for further description of our corporate transition costs.
See Note 18 for further description of the legal contingency accrual related to the putative
securities class actions and the related receivable from the Companys insurance providers. This
liability and related receivable were classified as long-term as of December 29, 2007.
The legal contingency accrual of $5.4 million as of December 29, 2007 is related to an
arbitration that was settled and paid in the first quarter of 2008.
74
Note 9 Other Liabilities
Other liabilities at the end of fiscal 2008 and 2007 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and post-retirement medical benefits, long-term portion |
|
$ |
10,239 |
|
|
$ |
18,957 |
|
Long-term deferred tax liability |
|
|
2,638 |
|
|
|
4,454 |
|
Long-term income tax payable |
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
777 |
|
Legal contingency accrual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
Long-term deferred compensation |
|
|
2,765 |
|
|
|
5,713 |
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
7,639 |
|
Long-term deferred revenue |
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
1,317 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,348 |
|
|
|
2,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
20,348 |
|
|
$ |
61,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 13 for further description of our pension benefits.
Note 10 Leases
Capital Lease Obligations
Voyager Learning Company leases certain facilities and equipment for selling and
administrative purposes under capital lease agreements with original lease terms up to 5 years.
Capital leases that exist as of year-end 2008 expire no later than 2010.
The gross value of leased capital assets was $1.4 million and $3.5 million at December 31,
2008 and December 29, 2007, respectively, which are included in Machinery and Equipment on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet. The gross value of leased capital assets was reduced
by $1.9 million as of the beginning of fiscal 2008 due to the assignment of certain property and
equipment leases to CSA. The accumulated amortization of leased capital assets was $1.0 million
and $1.6 million at December 31, 2008 and December 29, 2007, respectively. Amortization of capital
lease assets is recognized over the term of the lease on a straight line basis and included in
depreciation expense.
See Note 16 for further description of our lease termination costs.
75
Operating Leases
We lease certain facilities and equipment for production and selling and administrative
purposes under agreements with original lease periods up to 15 years (5 years excluding leases
terminated in early 2008). Leases generally include provisions requiring payment of taxes,
insurance, and maintenance on the leased property. Some leases include renewal options and rent
escalation clauses, and certain leases include options to purchase the leased property during or at
the end of the lease term.
In connection with the sale of PQIL in February 2007, the Company and ProQuest LLC (formerly
known as ProQuest-CSA LLC) (CSA) entered into a transition services agreement (TSA) and
subsequently certain assignment agreements that established, among other things, sublease payments
due the Company from CSA for use of certain property, equipment and office space at 777 Eisenhower
Parkway, Ann Arbor, Michigan (the 777 Facility) and 789 Eisenhower Parkway, Ann Arbor, Michigan
(the 789 Facility). The TSA was effective for up to one year following the sale of PQIL with
automatic month-to-month extensions thereafter; however, all sublease income received by the
Company from CSA ceased after the associated capital or operating leases were either fully assigned
to CSA or terminated by April 2008. Sublease income received from CSA for capital and operating
leases for fiscal 2008 and 2007 totaled $0.8 million and $4.4 million, respectively.
Pursuant to a Sublease Agreement entered into between the Company and CSA effective March 7,
2008, the Company subleased certain space located in the 789 Facility under operating leases. The
term of such sublease, which includes approximately 13,090 square feet of rental space (i) is for
six months from the Closing Date of March 7, 2008, with month to month extensions thereafter but
not past December 31, 2008, for approximately 10,030 square feet to be utilized by the Companys
remaining corporate functions in such facility, and (ii) runs from the Closing Date until December
31, 2008, with optional semi-annual extensions thereafter but not past December 31, 2010, for
approximately 3,060 square feet to be utilized by the Company for certain technology related
functions in the 789 Facility. Future lease payment obligations related to the Sublease Agreement
total $0.1 million for fiscal 2009 and 2010 combined.
Rent holidays and rent escalation provisions are considered in determining straight-line rent
expense to be recorded over the lease term. The lease term begins on the date of initial term of
the lease. Lease renewal periods are considered on a lease-by-lease basis and are generally not
included in the initial lease term. Total rental expense for fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006 was $3.0
million, $6.2 million, and $2.2 million, respectively.
76
Future minimum capital lease and operating lease payments under long-term non-cancelable
leases, and the related present value of capital lease payments at December 31, 2008 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Operating |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Leases |
|
|
Leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
1,272 |
|
2010 |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
320 |
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
333 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
258 |
|
Subsequent to 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments |
|
|
257 |
|
|
$ |
3,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Amount representing interest |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of net minimum lease payments |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: current portion |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations under capital leases, less current portion |
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 16 for further description of our lease termination costs.
Note 11 Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Our financial instruments include cash equivalents, investments available-for-sale, accounts
receivable, accounts payable and long-term debt.
The book value of cash equivalents and investments available-for-sale reflect fair market
value because these investments are recorded based on quoted market prices and/or other market data
for the same or comparable instruments and transactions as of the end of the reporting period. We
believe the book value of accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates fair value due to
their short-term nature.
Note 12 Debt
Upon closing on the sale of PQIL on February 9, 2007, the Company paid its remaining balances
owed to our lenders and noteholders and were released from all obligations under the 2002 Senior
Notes due 10/01/12, 2005 Senior Notes due 01/31/15, and the 2005 Revolving Credit Agreement,
including accrued interest, fees, and required make-whole premiums.
77
Interest expense for the first quarter of 2007 includes $2.3 million for amortization and
write-off of deferred financing fees related to the extinguished debt balances.
Cash paid for interest on Company debt, lines of credit and capital leases for continuing and
discontinued operations were immaterial amounts in fiscal 2008 and $1.1 million and $43.9 million
in 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Previously Outstanding Debt
2002 Senior Notes
On January 31, 2005, we entered into a First Amendment to the 2002 Note Purchase Agreement
dated as of October 1, 2002 (the 2002 Note Purchase Agreement), under and pursuant to which we
originally issued and sold our 5.45% senior notes (the 2002 Senior Notes) due October 1, 2012, in
an aggregate principal amount of $150 million. No principal payments were due until October 1,
2006. The notes amortized in seven equal annual payments of $21.4 million, beginning October 1,
2006 and ending on October 1, 2012. The interest rate on these senior notes was fixed at 5.45% and
was payable semi-annually. The first amendment, among other things, amended the financial covenants
under the 2002 Note Purchase Agreement to give effect to the acquisition of Voyager Expanded
Learning. Specifically, the consolidated adjusted net worth covenant and the consolidated debt
covenants were adjusted to be consistent with the terms of the 2005 Note Purchase Agreement. The
Waiver Agreement (defined below) modified the interest rate as of May 2, 2006 to give the holders
of the 2002 Senior Notes the option of a fixed interest rate of 7.87%, interest at the London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 2.5% or the interest at the Base Rate (defined below) plus 1.0%
and changed other provisions as described below.
2005 Senior Notes
The 2005 Note Purchase Agreement dated as of January 31, 2005 (the 2005 Note Purchase
Agreement) provided for, among other things, the issuance and sale of the Companys 5.38% Senior
Notes due January 31, 2015, in the aggregate principal amount of $175 million (the 2005 Senior
Notes). No principal payments were due until January 31, 2010. We were required to make six equal
annual principal payments of $29.1 million on the 2005 Senior Notes commencing on January 31, 2010.
The applicable annual interest on the 2005 Notes was fixed at 5.38% and was payable semi-annually
in arrears calculated on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months. The Waiver Agreement
(defined below) modified the interest rate as of May 2, 2006 to give the holders of the 2005 Senior
Notes the option of a fixed interest rate of 7.87%, interest at LIBOR plus 2.5% or interest at the
Base Rate plus 1.0% and changed other provisions as described below.
78
2005 Revolving Credit Agreement
On January 31, 2005, we replaced our previous revolving credit agreement with a new variable
interest rate facility (the 2005 Revolving Credit Agreement). The 2005 Revolving Credit Agreement
was a five-year, unsecured revolving credit facility in an amount up to $275 million, with a
sub-facility for letters of credit (in an amount not to exceed $20 million) and a sub-facility for
swingline loans (in an amount not to exceed $15 million). The final maturity date of the 2005
Revolving Credit Agreement was January 31, 2010 with no principal payments due until that date.
Borrowings and letters of credit under the 2005 Revolving Credit Agreement originally bore
interest, at our option, at either LIBOR plus a spread ranging from 0.75% to 1.75% or 0.0% to 0.25%
over an alternative base rate. The alternative base rate is the greater of the LaSalle Bank Midwest
National Association prime rate or the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50% (Base Rate). The Waiver
Agreement (defined below) modified the interest rate as of May 2, 2006 to give the lenders the
option of LIBOR plus 2.5% or the Base Rate plus 1.0%. The interest rate in effect as of December
30, 2006 was LIBOR + 2.5%, which was 7.85% on $22.2 million outstanding at December 30, 2006.
The 2002 Note Purchase Agreement, the 2005 Note Purchase Agreement and the 2005 Revolving
Credit Agreement are collectively referred to as the Credit Agreements.
On February 9, 2006, we announced the restatement of our historical financial statements. The
restatement resulted in failure to comply with the covenants set forth in the Credit Agreements.
The events of default included, but were not limited to, failure to deliver the annual audited
financial statements for the 2005 fiscal year and related compliance certificate within the
required period, failure to comply with the rules and regulations of the SEC, failure to notify the
bank agent or any bank lender of any event of default, material misrepresentations, and failure to
make the payment of interest on a portion of the existing bank advances and on the existing 2002
Senior Notes.
79
On May 2, 2006, the Company entered into a Waiver and Omnibus Amendment Agreement (the Waiver
Agreement) by and among the Company, each of the other lenders party thereto (the Lenders) and
LaSalle Bank Midwest National Association, as collateral agent. This Waiver Agreement was effective
until November 30, 2006, and was subject to the Companys ongoing compliance with certain
additional covenants. Under the terms of the Waiver Agreement:
|
|
|
the Lenders agreed not to exercise remedies available to them
resulting from the Companys defaults under its Credit Agreements and
to temporarily waive the specified existing and continuing defaults
during the period commencing on the date of default and expiring on
November 30, 2006 unless the date was extended to January 31, 2007 if
the Company achieved certain pre-determined milestones, |
|
|
|
|
the Credit Agreements were amended to provide that the covenants,
events of default and other provisions were substantially the same
among those agreements, |
|
|
|
|
the Credit Agreements were amended to provide that the financial
covenants contained in the Credit Agreements were replaced by monthly
EBITDA and capital expenditures covenants, |
|
|
|
|
the swingline facility contained in the 2005 Revolving Credit
Agreements was cancelled, |
|
|
|
|
the existing amounts outstanding under the 2005 Revolving Credit
Agreement which were repaid as of the effective date of the Waiver
Agreement could not be re-borrowed, |
|
|
|
|
the revolving commitment under the 2005 Revolving Credit Agreement was
capped at $32.8 million, |
|
|
|
|
a new superpriority credit facility was established in an amount up to
$56 million in the aggregate, so long as the Company was in compliance
with the underlying terms and conditions of the Waiver Agreement, |
80
|
|
|
the Company was required to grant a security interest in substantially
all its assets and to provide guarantees from all its domestic
subsidiaries with respect to the Credit Agreements and the
superpriority credit facility, |
|
|
|
|
borrowings under the superpriority credit facility would be at either
LIBOR plus 3.5% or the Base Rate plus 2.0% which was on average
approximately 175 basis points higher than under the then existing
Credit Agreements, and |
|
|
|
|
the Company would pay various fees, including a waiver fee applicable
to the 2002 Senior Notes, the 2005 Senior Notes, and the existing 2005
Revolving Credit Agreement of 25 basis points ($1.3 million), and a
100 basis point origination fee ($0.6 million) on the superpriority
credit facility. |
In October 2006, in order to sell PQBS to Snap-on Incorporated, the Company entered into a
Waiver Agreement which extended the waiver period from November 30, 2006 to March 15, 2007. In
addition the amendment modified the superpriority credit facility allowing the company to borrow up
to $15.0 million beginning January 1, 2007, increasing to $20.3 million on February 1, 2007, and
decreasing to zero on March 15, 2007.
On November 28, 2006, the Company sold PQBS to Snap-on Incorporated. The aggregate
consideration received by the Company was $514 million including the assumption by Snap-on of
approximately $19 million of debt. Upon completing the sale of PQBS on November 28, 2006, the
Company used the proceeds from the sale, along with certain other funds from the Company, to repay
$475.8 million, representing 89% of its outstanding debt.
As of December 30, 2006, debt was $58.2 million excluding capital leases. The interest rate in
effect under the amended 2005 Revolving Credit Agreement was LIBOR + 2.5%, which was 7.85% on $22.2
million of debt outstanding. The company did not have the ability to borrow any additional amounts
under the 2005 Revolving Credit Agreement as of December 30, 2006. The interest rate on Senior
Notes was a fixed interest rate of 7.87% on $28.1 million of debt outstanding and a variable rate
of LIBOR + 2.5%, which was 7.85% on $7.9 million outstanding at December 30, 2006.
81
Note 13 Profit-Sharing, Pension, and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
Defined Contribution Plans
Eligible employees who elect to do so can participate in our defined contribution
profit-sharing retirement plans. As the Company is not obligated to continue these defined
contribution plans in future years, the Company expenses its annual contributions to these plans
but does not record a liability for these plans. The amounts charged to earnings for fiscal 2008,
2007 and 2006 related to these plans were $0.8 million, $0.8 million, and $3.0 million,
respectively.
The Company also has contractual obligations under a frozen replacement benefit plan (RBP)
for a small number of terminated and retired executives and one current employee. Because the RBP
is frozen, no participant can make or is entitled to additional contributions. Instead the Company
has accrued a liability totaling $5.6 million as of year end 2008 to reflect its estimated future
obligation for RBP. The current portion of the RBP liability, which was $3.1 million at year end
2008, is included on the line Salaries, bonus and benefits in Note 8 to these financial
statements. The long term portion of the RBP liability, which was $2.5 million at year end 2008,
is included on the line Long-term deferred compensation
in Note 9 of these financial statements. See Future Contributions in
this footnote regarding lump sum payments made in January 2009
which further reduced the RBP liability.
Defined Benefit Plan and Other Postretirement Benefit Plan
We also have a frozen defined benefit pension plan covering certain terminated and retired
former domestic employees. The benefits are primarily based on years of service and/or
compensation during the years immediately preceding retirement. We use a measurement date of
December 31 for our pension and postretirement benefit plans.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of SFASs No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R) (SFAS
No. 158). This statement requires reporting of the funded status of defined benefit
postretirement plans as an asset or liability in the statement of financial position, recognizing
changes in the funded status due to gains or losses, prior service costs, and net transition assets
or obligations in other comprehensive income in the year the changes occur, adjusting other
comprehensive income when the gains or losses, prior service costs, and net transition assets or
obligations are recognized as components of net period benefit cost through amortization, and
measuring the funded status of a plan as of the date of the statement of financial position, with
limited exceptions. SFAS No. 158 was effective for recognition of the funded status of the benefit
plans for fiscal years ended after December 15, 2006 and was effective for the measurement date
provisions for fiscal years ended after December 15, 2008. We adopted SFAS No. 158 effective
December 30, 2006, with minimal impact to our financial statements.
82
As a result of the sale of PQIL, the obligation for our United Kingdom (U.K.) pension plan
was assumed by the buyer of PQIL and as of February 2007 the Company has no further
obligation to make U.K. pension contributions. The Company made payments of $22.9 million in early
2007 to its U.K. pension plan concurrent with the sale of PQIL in February 2007.
In addition, we have contributory and non-contributory postretirement medical benefit plans
and a non-contributory postretirement life insurance benefit plan covering certain domestic
employees. All of these other postretirement benefit plans are unfunded. Effective January 1,
2006 we ceased to offer a retiree medical program.
The net cost of our defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan for
fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Defined Benefit |
|
|
Other Postretirement |
|
|
|
Pension Plan |
|
|
Benefits |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Recognized net actuarial loss/(gain) |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pension and other postretirement
benefit cost (income) |
|
$ |
1,314 |
|
|
$ |
1,324 |
|
|
$ |
1,365 |
|
|
$ |
(93 |
) |
|
$ |
(96 |
) |
|
$ |
(96 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
Obligation and Funded Status
The funded status of our defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan at
the end of fiscal 2008 and 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Defined Benefit |
|
|
Other Postretirement |
|
|
|
Pension Plan |
|
|
Benefits |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Benefit Obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation, beginning of year |
|
$ |
20,903 |
|
|
$ |
22,569 |
|
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
$ |
194 |
|
Service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Actuarial (gain)/loss |
|
|
(3,277 |
) |
|
|
(933 |
) |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
Benefits paid |
|
|
(2,039 |
) |
|
|
(1,922 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation, end of year |
|
$ |
16,829 |
|
|
$ |
20,903 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Plan Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value, beginning of year |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Company contributions |
|
|
2,039 |
|
|
|
1,922 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(2,039 |
) |
|
|
(1,922 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value, end of year |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded/(unfunded) status |
|
$ |
(16,829 |
) |
|
$ |
(20,903 |
) |
|
$ |
(77 |
) |
|
$ |
(134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit cost |
|
$ |
(16,829 |
) |
|
$ |
(20,903 |
) |
|
$ |
(77 |
) |
|
$ |
(134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts Recognized in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accrued benefit liability |
|
|
(6,648 |
) |
|
|
(2,060 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
Non-current accrued benefit liability |
|
|
(10,181 |
) |
|
|
(18,843 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized |
|
$ |
(16,829 |
) |
|
$ |
(20,903 |
) |
|
$ |
(77 |
) |
|
$ |
(134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008, we had a net actuarial gain of $0.3 million and $0.1 million for our
U.S. pension and other postretirement benefits, respectively. These amounts are included in
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Of these amounts,
we expect immaterial amounts to be recognized as a component of net pension and other
postretirement benefit cost (income) during 2009.
See Future Contributions in
this footnote regarding lump sum payments made in January 2009
which reduced the pension plan liability.
Plan Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Defined Benefit |
|
|
Other Postretirement |
|
|
|
Pension Plan |
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
The discount rate is determined by analyzing the average returns of high-quality fixed income
investments defined as AA-rated or better. We also utilize an interest rate yield curve for
instruments with maturities corresponding to our benefit obligations.
84
Additional Information
For our pension plan, the projected benefit obligation and accumulated benefit obligation at
the end of fiscal 2008 and 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Defined Benefit |
|
|
|
Pension Plan |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation |
|
$ |
16,829 |
|
|
$ |
20,903 |
|
Accumulated benefit obligation |
|
$ |
16,829 |
|
|
$ |
20,903 |
|
Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year |
|
|
8.50 |
% |
|
|
9.00 |
% |
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to
decline (the ultimate trend rate) |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
Assumed future health care cost trend rates do not have a significant effect on postretirement
medical benefit costs. A one percentage point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates
would have less than a two thousand dollar impact on the benefit plan obligation at year end 2008
and less than a four thousand dollar impact on the benefit plan obligation at year end 2007.
Future Contributions
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company provided an opportunity for participants in its
RBP and its defined benefit pension plan to receive a discounted lump sum distribution to settle
retirement obligations. Prior to the distribution opportunity, both plans were frozen, with no
participants entitled to make additional contributions or earn additional service years. Based on
the responses received, the Company paid cash out of approximately $7.9 million in January 2009
related to these lump sum payments. As a result of the settlements the Company expects to record a
gain of $1.3 million in January 2009. At the end of January 2009, after normal distributions and
the settlement, the total liability related to the RBP was $1.4 million and the total liability
related to the U.S. defined benefit plan was $11.2 million.
Total contributions expected to be paid under our frozen U.S. retirement plans or to the
beneficiaries thereof during fiscal 2009 are $9.7 million, consisting of $6.6 million to our U.S.
defined benefit plan and $3.1 million to RBP, including the lump sum payments made in January 2009.
85
Gross benefit payment obligations under our continuing defined benefit plans for the next ten
years are anticipated to be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Retirement |
|
|
Other Postretirement |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Plans (SRP and RBP) |
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
9,728 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,969 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,719 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,365 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,319 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
2014 - 2018 |
|
|
5,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
In December 2003, Congress passed the Medicare Act of 2003. We do not provide post-65 medical
or prescription drug coverage; therefore, our postretirement benefit liability and costs are not
impacted by the employer subsidy provision of the Act.
Note 14 Common Stock
We have 50,000,000 authorized shares of common stock, ($.001 par value per share), 30,550,443
shares issued and 29,874,145 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2008 and 30,552,129 shares
issued and 29,882,559 shares outstanding as of December 29, 2007.
Note 15 Stock-Based Compensation
As of December 31, 2008, the Company has one stock-based compensation plan, which is described
below. The total amount of pre-tax expense for stock-based compensation recognized in general and
administrative expense in fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006 was $0.9 million, $0.1 million, and $3.1
million, respectively. Additionally, zero, ($0.1) million and $1.2 million in pre-tax expense
(benefit) for stock-based compensation is recognized in earnings from discontinued operations in
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized for book purposes in
the consolidated statement of operations related to stock-based compensation was zero, zero, and
$0.4 million for fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively. The total tax benefit realized was
immaterial for 2008 and $0.2 million for both fiscal 2007 and 2006.
86
Stock Option Plan
In fiscal 2003, we adopted the 2003 ProQuest Strategic Performance Plan (Option Plan), which
replaced the ProQuest Company 1995 Stock Option Plan and the ProQuest Company Non-Employee
Directors Stock Option Plan. Under the Option Plan, 5,160,000 shares of common stock were reserved
for issuance. In 2004, an additional 1,532,000 shares were reserved for issuance. The Option Plan
is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors which has the authority to
establish the terms and conditions of awards granted under the Option Plan. Under the Option Plan,
the Committee can grant stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance stock, performance
units, annual management incentive awards and other stock or cash awards.
Options granted to certain executives may contain a replacement option feature. When the
options exercise price is paid with shares of the Companys common stock, which the executive
previously owned for more than six months, a replacement option is granted for the number of shares
used to make that payment. The replacement option has an exercise price equal to the fair market
value of the Companys common stock on the date the replacement option is granted; is exercisable
in full six months after the date of the grant; and has a term expiring on the expiration date of
the original options. Options granted in 2004 are not eligible for this replacement feature.
Long Term Incentive Performance (LTIP) Grants
In fiscal 2004, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors granted 1,961,500
nonqualified stock options with an exercise price of $30.97 per share to six members of our senior
executive team. On October 5, 2005 and November 2, 2005, an additional 100,000 and 175,000
nonqualified stock options with an exercise price of $36.52 and $30.97, respectively, were granted
to two new members of our senior executive team. These stock options were issued under a new Long
Term Incentive Performance (LTIP) plan consistent with the Boards desire that management deliver
long-term sustainable shareholder value. The number of options granted to each executive under the
2004 LTIP was the projected aggregate number of options that would have been granted annually over
a five year period to each of these executives based on their then positions and responsibilities.
Currently, there is only one executive who retains rights under the LTIP plan. The options
outstanding under this grant equal 440,000 shares. All other options granted under the LTIP have
been terminated or forfeited.
87
Under this grant, the options vest after seven years and expire in ten years. However, if
certain stock price thresholds are met during the initial seven year period, the vesting of the
options is accelerated. These stock price thresholds represented 8% to 10% compounded annual stock
price growth rates for 3 to 5 years as of the date of the grant.
The following table outlines the stock price thresholds and the number of options accelerated
at each target stock price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 grant |
|
|
|
Achievement |
|
|
Options |
|
Stock Price |
|
Period |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
$36.67 |
|
3 years |
|
|
|
208,000 |
|
$39.81 |
|
4 years |
|
|
|
246,000 |
|
$42.77 |
|
5 years |
|
|
|
283,000 |
|
$46.88 |
|
5 years |
|
|
|
440,000 |
|
If the options are exercised, the executive must retain 50% of all after-tax gains in shares
of the Company until his retirement or termination of employment at Voyager Learning Company.
Stock Appreciation Right (SAR) Grant
In fiscal 2007, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors granted a stock
appreciation right (SAR) with respect to 300,000 shares of the Companys common stock with an
exercise price of $8.55 per share to one member of our senior executive team. Under this grant,
the SAR vests over a three year period and expires in five years. The SAR will be settled in cash
in the amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of common stock over the exercise price
multiplied by the number of shares exercised. The SAR has been classified as a liability award
based on the cash settlement provisions.
Executive Stock Option Grants
At
the end of fiscal 2008, we had options outstanding for 342,335 shares granted to key
executives. The term for these options is six or ten years, vesting in equal annual increments
over either a three-year or a five-year period.
88
Nonvested Restricted Stock Grants
During fiscal 2006, we granted certain employees and members of our Board of Directors 2,067
shares of nonvested restricted stock, with market values at the date of grant of $0.1 million. In
fiscal 2007 and 2006, we cancelled 12,604 shares and 30,430 shares, respectively, of the nonvested
restricted stock granted, with market values at the date of grant of $0.4 million and $1.1 million,
respectively. These shares were valued at the market price at their respective award dates and are
being recognized as expense over the 3 year vesting period.
During fiscal 2008 and 2007 the Company issued 15,714 and 11,158, respectively, cash-based
restricted stock units to members of the Companys Board of Directors (2,619 and 1,594 units per
board member, respectively). Under this grant, the cash based restricted stock units vest after
six months. As of December 30, 2008 and December 29, 2007, each director was entitled to receive a
cash payment equal to the product of the 2,619 and 1,594 units, respectively, multiplied by the
closing stock price on December 30, 2008 and December 28, 2007, respectively. No actual shares
were issued in relation to these grants, but instead, the grants were intended to provide payment
to the members of the Board of Directors in a form of compensation that is related to the price of
the Companys stock. All cash settled restricted stock units related to these grants have been and
were classified as liability awards based on their cash settlement provisions and were valued at
the settlement amount of approximately $0.1 million at year end 2007, which was paid in January
2008. Liability and expense amounts related to these awards granted in 2008 are not material at
December 31, 2008.
Fair Value of Stock Option and SAR Grants
The fair value of each stock-based compensation award granted is estimated on the date of
grant using either the Black-Scholes option-pricing model or a binomial model.
89
All other stock option and SAR grants are calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model. The following assumptions were used during the periods presented to estimate the fair value
of awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected stock volatility |
|
|
45.90 |
% |
|
|
35.30 |
% |
|
|
39.00 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate (weighted average for fiscal year) |
|
|
1.10 |
% |
|
|
3.06 |
% |
|
|
5.19 |
% |
Expected years until exercise |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Summary of Stock Option and SAR Activity
A summary of the stock option and stock appreciation right transactions for fiscal 2006, 2007,
and 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Grantees |
|
|
Director Grantees |
|
|
LTIP Grantees |
|
|
SAR Grantee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
(000s) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
(000s) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
(000s) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
(000s) |
|
|
Price |
|
Balance at the end of
fiscal 2005 |
|
|
1,432 |
|
|
$ |
25.53 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
$ |
30.20 |
|
|
|
2,066 |
|
|
$ |
31.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
12.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
20.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
27.49 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
32.63 |
|
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
30.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards outstanding at
the end of fiscal 2006 |
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
$ |
25.21 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
$ |
24.68 |
|
|
|
1,806 |
|
|
$ |
31.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards exercisable at the
end of fiscal 2006 |
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
$ |
25.13 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
$ |
30.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of
awards granted during
fiscal 2006 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
8.55 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled |
|
|
(259 |
) |
|
|
25.66 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
26.78 |
|
|
|
(1,366 |
) |
|
|
31.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards outstanding at
the end of fiscal 2007 |
|
|
844 |
|
|
$ |
25.08 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
$ |
25.98 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
$ |
30.97 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
$ |
8.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards exercisable at the
end of fiscal 2007 |
|
|
844 |
|
|
$ |
25.08 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
$ |
25.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of
awards granted during
fiscal 2007 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled |
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
25.65 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
25.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards outstanding at
the end of fiscal 2008 |
|
|
342 |
|
|
$ |
24.23 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
$ |
25.99 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
$ |
30.97 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
$ |
8.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards exercisable at the
end of fiscal 2008 |
|
|
342 |
|
|
$ |
24.23 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
$ |
25.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
$ |
8.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2008 was
zero. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006 was
zero for all three years. The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between
the exercise price of the underlying awards and the closing stock price of $1.48 of our common
stock on December 31, 2008. The total grant date fair value of stock options vested during fiscal
2008, 2007, and 2006 was $0.3 million, $0.3 million, and $2.1 million, respectively.
90
As of December 31, 2008, there was $0.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to
outstanding stock options and stock appreciation rights, net of forecasted forfeitures. This
amount is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.1 years. To the extent the
forfeiture rate is different than what we have anticipated, stock-based compensation related to
these awards will be adjusted in accordance with SFAS No. 123R.
The following tables provide additional information with respect to stock options and stock
appreciation rights outstanding at the end of fiscal 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards Outstanding |
|
|
Awards Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Average |
|
Range of |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Exercise |
|
Exercise Price |
|
(000s) |
|
|
Life (Years) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
(000s) |
|
|
Life (Years) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$10.00 and Below |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
8.55 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
8.55 |
|
$10.01 - $15.00 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
12.29 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
12.29 |
|
$15.01 - $20.00 |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
18.88 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
18.88 |
|
$20.01 - $25.00 |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
21.81 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
21.81 |
|
$25.01 - $30.00 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
27.61 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
27.61 |
|
$30.01 - $35.00 |
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
31.13 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
31.95 |
|
$35.01 - $40.00 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
36.15 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
36.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
22.82 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
21.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
(000s) |
|
|
Life (Years) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest
as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
22.82 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
91
Summary of Nonvested Restricted Stock Activity
A summary of the nonvested restricted stock transactions for fiscal 2006, 2007, and 2008 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Grantees |
|
|
Director Grantees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
|
(000s) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(000s) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Nonvested restricted stock balance
at the end of fiscal 2005 |
|
|
118 |
|
|
$ |
33.55 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
$ |
28.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
29.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
34.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
34.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested restricted stock outstanding
at the end of fiscal 2006 |
|
|
72 |
|
|
$ |
32.61 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
$ |
28.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
33.11 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
28.10 |
|
Forfeited/cancelled |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
32.20 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
25.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested restricted stock outstanding
at the end of fiscal 2007 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
$ |
31.17 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
35.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
31.17 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
35.80 |
|
Forfeited/cancelled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested restricted stock outstanding
at the end of fiscal 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008, there were no remaining shares or unrecognized compensation cost
related to nonvested restricted stock.
The total fair value of restricted stock shares vested during fiscal 2008 and 2007 was
approximately $0.5 million and $1.8 million, respectively.
Securities Authorized for Issuance
Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans at December 31, 2008 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities |
|
|
|
Number of securities to be |
|
|
Weighted-average |
|
|
remaining available for |
|
|
|
issued upon exercise of |
|
|
exercise price of |
|
|
future issuance |
|
|
|
outstanding options |
|
|
outstanding options |
|
|
under equity |
|
Plan Category |
|
and rights |
|
|
and rights |
|
|
compensation plans (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
$ |
22.82 |
|
|
|
3,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
$ |
22.82 |
|
|
|
3,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes securities reflected in the first column, Number of securities to be issued upon
exercise of outstanding options and rights. |
92
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In fiscal 1996, our Board of Directors adopted the Associate Stock Purchase Plan (ASPP),
whereby employees are afforded the opportunity to purchase Voyager Learning Company shares, by
authorizing the sale of up to 500,000 shares of common stock. The purchase price of the shares is
95% of the lower of the closing market price at the beginning or end of each quarter. Under SFAS
No. 123R, the ASPP is a non-compensatory plan. Purchases under the ASPP were suspended effective
March 9, 2006. The number of ASPP shares purchased was zero for all fiscal years presented.
Note 16 Corporate Transition and Lease Termination Costs
On February 12, 2007, after the sale of PQBS and PQIL, the Companys Board of Directors
approved and announced to employees the closing of the corporate office in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
The transition plan, which was completed by year-end 2008, included the elimination of redundant
positions and transitioning the performance of certain operational activities to Dallas, Texas.
The Company expects to incur approximately $4.4 million in severance and retention expense related
to the transition plan, all of which has been accrued or paid as of December 31, 2008. Related
costs are included in general and administrative expense. The change in the accruals for corporate
transition costs related to severance and retention payments for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruals |
|
|
4,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments made |
|
|
(1,372 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2007 |
|
$ |
2,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruals |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments made |
|
|
(513 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
2,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion |
|
$ |
1,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion |
|
$ |
677 |
|
|
|
|
|
93
On January 1, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with one of its lessors, Relational,
LLC f/k/a Relational Funding Corporation (Relational) and ProQuest LLC (formerly known as
ProQuest-CSA LLC) (CSA) relating to certain obligations regarding the capital and operating
leases for certain property and equipment used at its facilities at 777 Eisenhower Parkway (the
777 Facility) and 789 Eisenhower Parkway (the 789 Facility) in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The
aforementioned leases originated as early as fiscal year 2005
with up to five year terms. Effective January 1, 2008, the Company conveyed, assigned, transferred
and delivered to CSA all of its right, title and interest and benefit of certain property and
equipment. The Company was released from any and all obligations relating to these leases and
Relational, as lessor, consented to such assignments and releases. Due to these assignments, the
write off of certain assets and liabilities under capital leases, such as office furniture, phone
and power supply systems, and video equipment, totaled a net charge of $0.1 million in the first
quarter of 2008.
On January 25, 2008, the Company entered into a series of agreements with its current
landlord, Transwestern Great Lakes, LP (Transwestern) and CSA relating to certain obligations
regarding the long term leases for the facilities in Ann Arbor, Michigan. On March 4, 2008, the
Company paid CSA $11.0 million, a portion of which was distributed to Transwestern for termination
of the lease relating to office space at the 777 Facility. Upon the Closing Date of March 7, 2008,
the Company was released from any and all obligations relating to the 15 year lease the Company
previously entered into for the 777 Facility. Through assignment, the Company was also released
from any and all obligations relating to the 15 year lease the Company previously entered into for
office space at the 789 Facility. The Company assigned all of its rights under the lease for the
789 Facility to CSA and CSA assumed the obligations of tenant under such lease, as amended.
Transwestern, as landlord, consented to such assignment. In connection with the termination and
assignment of these long term facility leases, certain leasehold improvements and deferred rent
were written off, which totaled a net charge of $0.6 million in the first quarter of 2008. The
Company recorded a total charge to expense in the first quarter of 2008 of $11.7 million for all
lease termination costs.
94
Note 17 Foreign Currency Transactions
We periodically have entered into contracts to buy or sell foreign currencies, primarily
British pounds and Canadian dollars. These contracts were properly recorded at fair market value
with the changes in fair value recognized in interest expense and were not designated for hedging
treatment under SFAS No. 133, as amended. At December 31, 2008 we have no outstanding foreign
currency contracts.
Net foreign currency transaction losses for fiscal 2006 of $1.3 million have been included in
general and administrative
expense. As a result of the sale agreements with Snap-On and CSA, the Company has tax-related
receivables and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. Transaction losses of $1.0 million
associated with these assets and liabilities have been included in other income (expense)in fiscal
2008. Transaction gains and losses in fiscal 2007 were not material to the financial statements.
Note 18 Contingent Liabilities
Putative Securities Class Actions
Between February and April 2006, four putative securities class actions, consolidated and
designated In re ProQuest Company Securities Litigation, were filed in the U.S. District Court for
the Eastern District of Michigan (the Court) against the Company and certain of its former and
then-current officers and directors. Each of these substantially similar lawsuits alleged that the
Company and certain officers and directors (the Defendants) violated Sections 10(b) and/or 20(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as well as the associated
Rule 10b-5, in connection with the Companys proposed restatement.
95
On May 2, 2006, the Court ordered the four cases consolidated and appointed lead plaintiffs
and lead plaintiffs counsel.
On July 22, 2008, the Company reached an agreement in principle to settle the consolidated
shareholder securities class action law suit filed against it and certain officers and directors in
the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan for $20 million. A Stipulation and
Agreement of Settlement was signed by the parties and the Court granted preliminary approval of
such agreement. During January 2009, the Company paid $4.0 million into an escrow account and our
insurers funded the remaining portion of the settlement into the escrow account as well. The
settlement is subject to final Court approval. There is no assurance that a final Court approval
will be obtained. If the settlement arrangement is not finalized, the Company intends to defend
itself vigorously.
Shareholder Derivative Lawsuits
On April 18, 2006 and December 19, 2006, respectively, two shareholder derivative lawsuits
were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (the Court),
purportedly on behalf of the Company against certain current and former officers and directors
of the Company by certain of the Companys shareholders. Both cases were assigned to Honorable
Avern Cohn, who entered a stipulated order staying the litigation pending completion of the
Companys restatement and a special committee investigation into the restatement.
On January 29, 2008, the Court entered an order consolidating the two cases and approving
co-lead and co-liaison counsel representing plaintiffs. Pursuant to a stipulated scheduling order
entered on February 15, 2008, plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint on March 20, 2008.
The consolidated amended complaint purports to state claims for breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of
control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets, unjust enrichment, rescission, imposition
of a constructive trust, violations of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and violations of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against current and former officers or directors of the Company and
one of its subsidiaries. On December 3, 2008 the Company reached an agreement in principle to
settle the shareholder derivative litigation law suit filed against it and certain officers and
directors in the Court. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company and its insurers would pay
an amount not to exceed $650,000 in attorneys fees and agree to maintain or adopt additional
corporate governance standards. The Companys portion of this amount is equal to $500,000. The
parties entered into Stipulation of Settlement on January 9, 2009. This Stipulation of Settlement
is subject to final Court approval and the provision of notice to shareholders. There is no
assurance that a final Court approval will be obtained or putative class member participation will
be sufficient. If the derivative litigation settlement arrangement is not finalized, the Company
intends to defend itself vigorously.
96
Securities and Exchange Commission Investigation
In February 2006, the Division of Enforcement of the SEC commenced an informal inquiry
regarding the Companys announcement of a possible restatement. In April 2006, the Division of
Enforcement of the SEC commenced a formal, non-public investigation in connection with the
Companys restatement. On July 22, 2008, the SEC (Commission) filed a settled enforcement action
against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Pursuant to
that settlement, the terms of which were disclosed previously by the Company, without admitting or
denying the allegations in the Complaint, the Company consented to the filing by the Commission
of a Complaint, and to the imposition by the Court of a final judgment of permanent injunction
against the Company. The Complaint alleges civil violations of the reporting, books and records
and internal controls provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The final judgment was
signed by the Court on July 28, 2008 and permanently enjoins the Company from future violations of
those provisions. No monetary penalty was imposed. The settlement resolved fully the previously
disclosed SEC investigation of the Companys restatement.
Data Driven Software Corporation vs. Voyager Expanded Learning et al.
Voyager Expanded Learning (VEL) was a defendant in an arbitration styled: D2 Data Driven
Software Corporation f/k/a EdSoft Software Corporation (EdSoft) v. Voyager Expanded Learning,
Inc., et al., before the American Arbitration Association, No. 71 117 Y 00238 06.
97
Effective on or about January 24, 2008, VEL, the individual respondents and EdSoft executed a
mutual release and settlement agreement. VEL subsequently paid EdSoft
$5.4 million in 2008 in connection
with that settlement. In addition to providing mutual releases between EdSoft, on one hand, and
VEL and the individual respondents, on the other hand, the parties agreed to dismiss all lawsuits
with prejudice. EdSoft also executed a release of arbitration award. The Company accrued $5.4
million related to this settlement as of year end 2006 and 2007.
Other Contingent Liabilities
We are also involved in various legal proceedings incidental to our business. Management
believes that the outcome of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon our
consolidated operations or financial condition and we believe we have recognized appropriate
reserves as necessary based on facts and circumstances known to management.
We have letters of credit in the amount of $1.1 million outstanding as of December 31, 2008 to
support workers compensation insurance coverage as well as collateral for the Companys credit
card and Automated Clearinghouse (ACH) programs.
Note 19 Related Party Transactions
On March 10, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors appointed Randy Best to serve as a member
of the Companys Board of Directors. Mr. Best was the Chief Executive Officer of VEL immediately
prior to the Companys acquisition of VEL and held 34% of the common stock. In connection with the
Companys acquisition of VEL, Mr. Best and the Company entered into a two year Consulting Agreement
(the Consulting Agreement) and a three year Non-Disclosure, Non-Solicitation and Non-Competition
Agreement, both of which became effective on January 31, 2005. As compensation for these services,
Mr. Best received payments of $40,000 per month for the first six months of the term and $26,666
per month for the last eighteen months of the term of the Consulting Agreement. Both of these
agreements have expired and were not extended. Effective November 5, 2008, Mr. Best resigned from
the Companys Board of Directors. Mr. Bests resignation was not due to any disagreement with the
Company or any matter relating to operations, policies, or practices.
98
The Non-Competition Agreement provided that Mr. Best will not disclose or use the confidential
information of VEL or the
Company in any way, except on behalf of the Company or VEL. Mr. Best also agreed that for
three years after January 31, 2005, and for the term of the Consulting Agreement, that he would
not, directly or indirectly, engage or participate in: (i) any capacity, anywhere in the United
States, in any business that is competitive to the business operated by VEL or in which VEL has
currently planned to engage; (ii) recruiting or soliciting any person to leave his or her
employment with the Company or VEL; and (iii) hiring or engaging any person who is or was an
employee of VEL from January 31, 2005 through and including the time of such hiring or engagement.
In the agreement, Mr. Best acknowledged that VEL is or plans to be engaged in the business of:
(i) developing, marketing, and selling reading and math-related materials for use by students in
grades K-12; and (ii) developing, marketing, and selling programs that are designed to enhance the
ability of teachers and school districts to teach reading to students in grades K-12. The
Non-Competition Agreement does not prevent Mr. Best from continuing his involvement with GlobalEd
Holdings Ltd. And EdCollege, Inc. to the extent that those entities, or affiliates thereof, do not
engage in the business of: (i) developing, marketing, or selling reading and math-related materials
for use by students in grades K-12; (ii) developing, marketing, or selling any courses, products or
services substantially similar to the Reading for Understanding and Foundations of Reading
programs offered by Voyager as of January 31, 2005 to be used by administrators or teachers in
grades K-12; and (iii) developing, marketing, or selling programs for any reading based curriculum
to those customers who are currently customers of VoyagerU , a division of VEL.
PQIL had sales of approximately $1.5 million to Apollo Group, Inc. and its affiliates in 2006.
Todd S. Nelson, a former director of the Company, was Chief Executive Officer of Apollo Group, Inc.
from August 2001 to January 2006 and President from February 1998 to January 2006. The sales were
an arms length transaction and the relationship with Apollo Library began prior to Mr. Nelsons
directorship.
PQIL had immaterial sales to The Readers Digest Association, Inc. (Readers Digest) and its
affiliates prior to the sale of PQIL in February 2007. Michael S. Geltzeiler, a director of the
Company until March 20, 2007, was Chief Financial Officer of Readers Digest during 2005. The sales
were an arms length transaction and Mr. Geltzeiler was not involved in any of the sales
transactions.
99
Note 20 Interim Financial Information (Unaudited)
The following table presents our quarterly results of operations for fiscal 2008 and fiscal
2007. For comparison purposes, results from the PQIL operations have been reclassified to
discontinued operations for all periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Total |
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Year |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
15,637 |
|
|
$ |
33,514 |
|
|
$ |
27,267 |
|
|
$ |
22,113 |
|
|
$ |
98,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
9,104 |
|
|
|
22,166 |
|
|
|
17,311 |
|
|
|
14,011 |
|
|
|
62,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes |
|
|
(24,632 |
) |
|
|
(1,601 |
) |
|
|
(5,110 |
) |
|
|
(51,321 |
) |
|
|
(82,664 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(24,632 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,601 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,110 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,161 |
) |
|
$ |
(81,504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share from continuing operations |
|
|
(0.82 |
) |
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
(0.17 |
) |
|
|
(1.68 |
) |
|
|
(2.73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share from continuing operations |
|
|
(0.82 |
) |
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
(0.17 |
) |
|
|
(1.68 |
) |
|
|
(2.73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
20,059 |
|
|
$ |
36,330 |
|
|
$ |
31,837 |
|
|
$ |
21,386 |
|
|
$ |
109,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
13,338 |
|
|
|
25,810 |
|
|
|
21,864 |
|
|
|
12,408 |
|
|
|
73,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes |
|
|
(15,885 |
) |
|
|
(1,985 |
) |
|
|
(3,207 |
) |
|
|
(78,581 |
) |
|
|
(99,658 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(6,074 |
) |
|
|
(756 |
) |
|
|
(1,226 |
) |
|
|
(4,340 |
) |
|
|
(12,396 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(9,811 |
) |
|
|
(1,229 |
) |
|
|
(1,981 |
) |
|
|
(74,241 |
) |
|
|
(87,262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued
operations, net of income tax |
|
|
4,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
5,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued
operations, net of income tax |
|
|
46,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
41,355 |
|
|
$ |
(1,229 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,981 |
) |
|
$ |
(73,375 |
) |
|
$ |
(35,230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share from continuing operations |
|
|
(0.33 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
(2.49 |
) |
|
|
(2.92 |
) |
Earnings per share from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
Gain per share from sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
1.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
|
1.38 |
|
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
(2.46 |
) |
|
|
(1.18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share from continuing operations |
|
|
(0.33 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
(2.49 |
) |
|
|
(2.92 |
) |
Earnings per share from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
Gain per share from sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
1.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
|
1.38 |
|
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
(2.46 |
) |
|
|
(1.18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The loss from continuing operations for the fourth quarter 2008 and 2007 includes a goodwill
impairment charge of $43.1 million and $67.2 million, respectively. Additionally, the loss from
continuing operations for the fourth quarter 2008 includes lease termination costs of $11.7 million
(See Note 16 presented herein for further information).
100
|
|
|
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. |
|
|
On November 7, 2007, the Company notified its independent registered public accounting firm,
KPMG LLP, of its intent to engage Whitley Penn LLP as its new independent registered public
accounting firm effective for the Companys 2007 fiscal year audit and quarterly reviews. The
decision to change the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for the 2007 fiscal
year was approved by the Audit Committee of the Companys Board of Directors on November 14, 2007.
KPMGs appointment as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm continued through
the issuance of their audit reports on the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal
controls over financial reporting for the 2006 fiscal year and ceased upon the completion of their
review of the 2006 quarterly filings on Form 10-Q.
The audit report of KPMG on managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2005 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor was it
qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles, except that KPMGs
report indicates that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
KPMGs reports concluded that the Company had (i) material weaknesses in entity-level controls
because the Company did not maintain an effective control environment and entity-level controls
included in the risk assessment, information and communications and monitoring components of
internal control, (ii) material weaknesses surrounding adequate financial statement preparation and
review procedures because the Company did not maintain adequate policies and procedures or employ
personnel with sufficient knowledge and experience to ensure that timely, accurate, and reliable
consolidated financial statements were prepared and reviewed, (iii) inadequate controls over the
proper application of accounting principles because the Company did not maintain adequate policies
and procedures to account for various complex transactions and did not employ personnel with
sufficient knowledge and experience to properly prepare, document, and review the related
accounting treatment to ensure that these transactions complied with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles, (iv) material weaknesses surrounding appropriate general
computing controls to support effective information technology controls over financial data and
systems because the Company did not maintain adequate general computing control policies and
procedures or employ personnel with sufficient computing control knowledge and experience to limit
access to various system and controls.
101
The audit report of KPMG on managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 30, 2006 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor was it
qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles, except that KPMGs
report indicates that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 30, 2006, based on criteria established in COSO. KPMGs reports concluded
that the Company had (i) material weaknesses in entity-level controls because the Company did not
maintain an effective control environment and certain entity-level controls included in the risk
assessment, information and communications and monitoring components of internal control were not
designed or operating effectively, (ii) material weaknesses surrounding adequate financial
statement preparation and review procedures because the Company did not maintain adequate policies
and procedures to ensure that timely, accurate, and reliable consolidated financial statements were
prepared and reviewed, (iii) inadequate controls over the proper application of accounting
principles because the Company did not maintain adequate policies and procedures to account for
various complex transactions to ensure that these transactions were accounted for in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, (iv) material weaknesses surrounding
appropriate general computing controls to support effective information technology controls over
financial data and systems because the Company did not maintain adequate general computing control
policies and procedures or employ personnel with sufficient computing control knowledge and
experience to limit access to various system and controls, (v) material weakness surrounding
internal control over financial reporting relative to the Companys accounting for income taxes
because sufficient review and authorization controls were not in place to ensure the income tax
provision was properly recorded, and (vi) material weakness surrounding internal control over
financial reporting relative to the Companys accounting for revenue related to training and
support services because controls were not designed to ensure timely review and update of estimates
of future training and support used in the recognition of revenue.
102
During the fiscal years ended December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 and the subsequent
period through September 17, 2008, there were no disagreements with KPMG on any matter of
accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or
procedures, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of KPMG, would have caused it
to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its report.
Except for the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting disclosed
above and as fully described in the Companys 2006 Form 10-K and 2005 Form 10-K, during the fiscal
years ended December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 and subsequent period through September 17,
2008, there were no reportable events as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
On November 14, 2007, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved
the engagement of Whitley Penn LLP as the Companys new independent registered public accounting
firm effective for the Companys 2007 fiscal year. Whitley Penn had previously issued an audit
report dated September 28, 2007 on the carve-out financial statements of Voyager Expanded Learning,
L.P., a subsidiary of the Company, as of and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. Other
than as required to complete the audit of the subsidiary carve-out financial statements, the
Company did not consult with Whitley Penn during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005 and
January 1, 2005 or from the period from January 1, 2006 through November 14, 2007 regarding (i) the
application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; (ii)
the type of audit opinion that might be rendered by Whitley Penn on the Companys consolidated
financial statements or the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting; or (iii)
any other matter that was the subject of a disagreement between the Company and KPMG or a
reportable event noted in the connection with the performance of services per Item 304(a)(2)(ii) of
Regulation S-K.
103
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management of the Company, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934) pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act. The Companys
disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported on a timely basis and that such information is communicated to management,
including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and its Board of Directors to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2008.
(b) Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or
that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
It should be noted that the Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, do not expect that the Companys internal controls will necessarily
prevent all errors or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived or operated, can
provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints,
and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control
over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of the Companys annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or
detected on a timely basis.
104
Management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 based on the framework published by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, Internal Control Integrated Framework.
Through managements assessment, management did not identify any material weaknesses in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008.
As a result of the assessment discussed above, management of the Company has concluded that
the Companys internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2008.
Whitley Penn LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report on the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which is
included herein.
(c) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in
connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15
that was conducted during the last fiscal quarter, that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information.
None.
105
Part III
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table provides information about our directors and executive officers as of
February 27, 2009:
2008 Executive Officers and Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age* |
|
Position at the Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board of Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William E. Oberndorf
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David G. Brown
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James P. Roemer
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary L. Roubos
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frederick J. Schwab
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Committee
(led by Richard Surratt) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard J. Surratt
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bradley C. Almond
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Effective January 1,
2009) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Todd W. Buchardt
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald Klausner
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
President, Voyager Expanded Learning |
|
|
|
* |
|
Ages indicated above are as of February 27, 2009. |
On November 5, 2008, the Company and David W. Asai agreed that Mr. Asai would leave his
position as Chief Financial Officer, effective December 31, 2008. Mr. Asais departure is
consistent with the Companys previously announced transition plan to relocate its corporate office
to Dallas, Texas. On November 5, 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Bradley C.
Almond as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, effective January 1, 2009. Mr. Almond has
been the Chief Financial Officer of the Voyager Expanded Learning operating unit located in Dallas,
Texas, since 2006.
106
The business experience and certain other information relating to each of our directors and
executive officers are set forth below:
Board of Directors.
David G. Brown was appointed to the Board of Directors in
January 1994 and is Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee. He has been the
Managing Partner of Oak Hill Venture Partners since August 1999 and a Principal in Arbor Investors
LLC since August 1995, Chief Financial Officer of Keystone, Inc. from September 1998 to February
2000, and a Vice President of Keystone, Inc. since August 1993. Prior to joining Keystone, Mr.
Brown was a Vice President in the Corporate Finance Department of Salomon Brothers Inc. from August
1985 to July 1993. He is a Director of eGain Communications, along with several private companies.
William E. Oberndorf was appointed to the Board of Directors in July 1988. He is Chairman of
the Compensation Committee in addition to serving on Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr.
Oberndorf has served as Managing Director of SPO Partners & Co. since March 1991. He is a Director
for Rosewood Hotels and Resorts and Director Emeritus of Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc.
James P. Roemer was appointed to the Board of Directors in February 1995. He served as
Chairman of the Board from January 1998 until May 2004, as President of the Company (formerly Bell
& Howell Company) from 1995 to 2001 and as Chief Executive Officer from 1997 until 2003. From 1995
to 1997, he also served as Chief Operating Officer of the Company. Prior to that, he served as
President and Chief Executive Officer of PQIL from 1994 to 1995. Mr. Roemer joined the Company as
President and Chief Operating Officer of PQBS in 1991. He was promoted to President and Chief
Executive Officer of that business in 1993. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Roemer was President
of the Michie Group, Mead Data Central from 1989 to 1991. From 1982 to 1989 he was Vice President
and General Manager of Lexis. From 1981 to 1982, he served as acting President of Mead Data
Central. Mr. Roemer is also a director of Advent Software.
Gary L. Roubos was appointed to the Board of Directors in February 1994. He is Chairman of
the Audit Committee in addition to serving on the Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Roubos
ceased being a member of the Compensation Committee in June 2006. Mr. Roubos was Chairman of the
Board of Dover Corporation from 1989 to 1998 and was President from 1977 to 1993. He is also a
Director of Omnicom Group, Inc.
107
Frederick J. Schwab was appointed to the Board of Directors in September 2004. He is a member
of the Companys Compensation Committee. Mr. Schwab was President and CEO of Porsche Cars North
America (PCNA) from 1992 to 2003. He joined PCNA in 1985
as Executive Vice President of Finance & Administration and was appointed Senior Vice
President in 1988. Prior to joining PCNA, Mr. Schwab, a certified public accountant, was with
Fruehauf Corp. and Touche Ross & Company. Currently, Mr. Schwab serves as a Director to Boyd
Gaming Corporation where he is Chairman of the Audit Committee and a member of the Corporate
Governance Committee.
Executive Committee.
Richard J. Surratt was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of Voyager Learning
Company on January 30, 2007. Prior to that, he was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer starting in November 2005. Before joining the Company, he was Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Independence Air where he was responsible for the Companys accounting,
treasury, legal, financial planning, and information systems activities. Prior to that, he was
with Mobil Corporation in various financial and management positions.
Bradley C. Almond was named Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Voyager Learning
Company in January 2009. Mr. Almond joined Voyager Learning Company in November 2006 as Chief Financial
Officer of the Voyager Expanded Learning operating unit. Before
joining Voyager, Mr. Almond was chief financial officer,
treasurer and vice president of administration at Zix
Corporation, a publicly traded high tech company in Dallas, Texas, since 2003. From 1998 to 2003,
Mr. Almond worked at Entrust Inc., where he held a
variety of management positions, including president of Entrust Japan (in Tokyo), general manager
Entrust Asia and Latin America, vice president of finance and vice president of sales and customer
operations. Mr. Almond is a licensed Certified Public Accountant.
Todd W. Buchardt has been Senior Vice President since November 2002, Vice President in March
2000, and General Counsel in April 1998 and in September 1998 was elected to the additional office
of Secretary. Prior to joining us, he held various legal positions with First Data Corporation
from 1986 to 1998.
108
Ronald Klausner was appointed President of Voyager Education in October 2005. He was
President of PQIL from April 2003 to October 2005. He came to the Company from D&B
(formerly known as Dun & Bradstreet), a global business information and technology solutions
provider, where he worked for 27 years. He most recently served as the Companys Senior Vice
President, U.S. Sales, leading a segment with more than $900 million in revenue. Previously, he
led global data and operations, and customer service, providing business-to-business, credit,
marketing and purchasing information in over 200 countries.
Audit Committee.
The
Company has an Audit Committee whose members consist of
Messrs. Roubos, Brown and Schwab with Mr. Roubos serving as
Chairman. Mr. Schwab joined the Audit Committee on June 13, 2008. The Audit Committee
operates under a formal written charter, which has been approved by the Board and available on the
Companys website (www.voyagercompany.com). All of the members of the Audit Committee are
independent under NASDAQ listing standards and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Board determined each of the members of the Audit Committee qualifies as an Audit Committee
financial expert as defined under the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that certain of the Companys directors, executive
officers and 10% shareholders (Insiders) file with the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC)
reports disclosing their beneficial ownership and any changes in ownership of the Companys common
stock. Based upon review of such reports it has received and based upon written representations
that no other reports were required, the Company is not aware of any instances of noncompliance or
late compliance with Section 16(a) filing requirements during the year ended December 31, 2008.
Code of Ethics
In March 2003, we adopted a code of ethics, which was reviewed and updated in November 2008,
for all of our finance employees, including our Chief Financial Officer and our Chief Executive
Officer. A copy of this code of ethics is set forth on our website, www.voyagercompany.com. We
adopted this code to promote such standards as (1) honest and ethical conduct; (2) full, fair,
accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in our periodic reports; and (3) compliance with
applicable governmental rules and regulations. Amendments to, or waivers from, the code of ethics will
be posted on our website.
109
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A)
The compensation structure for the Companys named executive officers reflects the unique
circumstances it faced following the sale of PQBS in November 2006 and PQIL in February 2007. In
light of these events, the Compensation Committee has focused on the need to:
|
|
|
Retain key executives during this uncertain period to achieve strategic objectives
related to its remaining line of business, |
|
|
|
Complete the restatement of the Companys financial statements in compliance with
applicable accounting standards as expeditiously as possible; and |
|
|
|
Settle various outstanding issues stemming from the
restatement including shareholder lawsuits and a formal SEC
investigation. |
The Committees emphasis on retention in order to maintain its business and restate its
financial statements resulted in a greater emphasis on short- and mid-term compensation, guaranteed
minimum bonuses and retention agreements for Messrs. Surratt, Klausner, Buchardt, Asai and
Campbell. The Committee developed certain of these arrangements for the named executive officers
after extensive consultation with Frederic W. Cook & Company, the Committees independent
compensation consultant. Certain retention agreements also reflect negotiations with the Companys
creditors in 2006 and 2007, including who should receive retention agreements and how and when payments should be
made under those agreements. Bonus payments to Mr. Asai were provided in 2008 in connection with
the Company finalizing its Form 10-K reports for 2006 and 2007. In addition, Mr. Klausner and Mr.
Buchardt were provided bonuses for 2008 in recognition of special achievements that were not recognized by
the annual bonus formula. Mr. Campbell also was guaranteed a
long-term incentive cash award. Except for Mr. Klausners
stock appreciation rights awarded in 2007, no
equity grants were made in 2007 or 2008.
110
KEY COMPONENTS OF COMPENSATION
The objective of the Companys compensation program has been to reward executives in a manner
consistent with the Companys strategic objectives. The Companys compensation
program for executive officers has consisted primarily of the following components:
|
|
|
Annual incentive compensation and bonuses |
In prior years, equity awards were also a component of the compensation program.
Base Salary
Base salary is intended to provide a fixed component of compensation reflecting the named
executive officers position and responsibilities. The Company historically compared base salary
as well as other compensation elements against base salary for comparable positions as a guideline
for annual salary adjustments. No named executive officer received a base salary increase in 2008.
Annual Incentive Compensation and Bonuses
Annual incentive compensation for our named executive officers has historically been based
primarily on achieving pre-established financial goals. Recently, the Committee has adjusted its
approach based on the Companys challenges in light of the financial restatements and the
contribution of each named executive officer. In addition, certain amounts of annual incentive
compensation were guaranteed by the Company.
For 2008, the Committee established opportunities to earn short-term incentive compensation
based on sales (60%) and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (40%). In
prior years, revenue rather than sales was used as an incentive target but the Company shifted from
revenue to sales to make the incentive targets consistent with targets for the sales organizations
and to have a more current business indicator. However, the general incentive compensation program
was not material in determining the 2008 bonuses and non-equity incentive payments for the named
executive officers. For 2008, bonuses and non-equity incentive payments to named executive
officers were made as follows:
|
|
|
Mr. Surratts target bonus award for 2008 equal to $573,750 was guaranteed through
June 20, 3008 under his amended retention agreement and the target bonus for the year
was paid. |
|
|
|
Mr. Buchardts bonus of $148,328 reflects his achievement of favorable results with
respect to extraordinary and unusual legal matters that arose following the Companys
need for financial restatements. |
111
|
|
|
Mr. Klausner bonus of $100,000 reflects his efforts in introducing additional
products for the Voyager Education segment and the continued growth in the Learning A-Z
and ExploreLearning product lines. |
|
|
|
Mr. Asais 2008 bonus of $230,000 was two performance bonuses of $115,000 each for
completing and filing the Companys financial statements for each of fiscal year 2006
and fiscal year 2007. |
|
|
|
Mr. Campbells 2008 bonus of $132,480 was comprised of an incentive award of $75,000
guaranteed as part of a retention letter, $42,480 as earned based on an average 96%
achievement of revenue (weighted 60%) and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation
and amortization (weighted 40%) targets for EL and LAZ, and $15,000 as a discretionary
bonus for reasonable performance in a difficult year. |
Equity Awards
Historically, the Compensation Committee has granted stock options to its executives as a
long-term incentive award. Given that the Companys common stock was not traded on a national
stock exchange during 2008, neither stock options nor other equity were considered an appropriate
form of incentive compensation.
Benefits
Due to the change in the Companys size and complexity, the Committee terminated the Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan, including the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP). In lieu
of maintaining the plan, the Committee provides a cash payment in lieu of the SERP benefit.
112
Severance
The named executive officers had previously entered into agreements which provided severance
protection as explained in more detail in Employment and Severance Arrangements. These severance
arrangements continued during 2008.
Stock Restrictions
As part of the retention agreements, certain executives agreed not to sell or otherwise
transfer shares of the Company within 90 days after their termination of employment without the
express written consent of the Companys general counsel. The 2004 options require Mr. Klausner to
retain 50% of all after-tax gain in shares of the Company of such options until his termination of
employment.
The retention agreements with certain executives provide that if any action or inaction by
such executives constitutes grounds for termination for cause under the retention agreement, the
Company may recover all awards and payments made under the retention agreements.
ACCOUNTING AND TAX
The Compensation Committee considers the tax and accounting consequences in structuring
compensation as well as retention agreements, including, as mentioned above, the tax implications
associated with a change in control and certain terminations of deferred compensation programs.
However, the Compensation Committee believes that it is important to preserve flexibility and
maximize the effectiveness of the Companys executive compensation programs in a manner designed to
retain and reward high-performing executives or promote strategic corporate goals and therefore tax
and accounting consequences are not the sole determinant in structuring compensation.
Report of the Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed with management the foregoing Compensation
Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2008. Based on this review and discussion,
the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis for the year ending December 31, 2008 be included in the
Companys Form 10-K for filing with the SEC.
Compensation Committee:
William E. Oberndorf, Chair
Frederick J. Schwab
James Roemer
113
COMPENSATION AND STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION
2006-2008 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth the total compensation paid or earned during the fiscal years
ended December 31, 2008, December 29, 2007, and
December 30, 2006 by the Companys Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and
three of the other most highly compensated officers(the NEOs).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Option |
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
Salary |
|
|
Bonus |
|
|
Awards |
|
|
Awards |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Total |
|
Position |
|
Year |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) (1) |
|
|
($) (2) |
|
|
($) (3) |
|
|
($) (4) |
|
|
($) (5) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard J. Surratt |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
721,812 |
|
|
$ |
573,750 |
|
|
$ |
55,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
266,869 |
|
|
$ |
1,617,988 |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer, |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ |
649,696 |
|
|
$ |
1,973,750 |
|
|
$ |
66,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
378,963 |
|
|
$ |
3,069,076 |
|
Voyager Learning Company
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
313,027 |
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
64,344 |
|
|
$ |
335,079 |
|
|
$ |
51,000 |
|
|
$ |
201,472 |
|
|
$ |
1,114,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald Klausner |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
578,582 |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
753,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
89,172 |
|
|
$ |
1,521,118 |
|
President, |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ |
542,584 |
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
950,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
105,363 |
|
|
$ |
1,673,804 |
|
Voyager
Expanded Learning
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
537,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
868,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
342,763 |
|
|
$ |
1,747,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Todd W. Buchardt |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
351,370 |
|
|
$ |
148,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
109,451 |
|
|
$ |
609,149 |
|
Senior Vice
President, |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ |
314,033 |
|
|
$ |
313,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
460,493 |
|
|
$ |
109,831 |
|
|
$ |
1,197,857 |
|
General Counsel and Corporate
Secretary, |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
300,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
267,904 |
|
|
$ |
384,076 |
|
|
$ |
56,594 |
|
|
$ |
1,009,316 |
|
Voyager
Learning Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Asai |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
244,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
230,000 |
|
|
$ |
85,667 |
|
|
$ |
560,220 |
|
Senior Vice
President, |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ |
232,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
115,000 |
|
|
$ |
84,162 |
|
|
$ |
431,350 |
|
Chief Financial Officer,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyager Learning
Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Campbell |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
283,654 |
|
|
$ |
90,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42,480 |
|
|
$ |
12,239 |
|
|
$ |
433,373 |
|
Chief Operating
Officer, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyager
Expanded Learning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In the case of Mr. Surratt, the amount earned in 2008 represents a payment of $573,750 with
respect to his 2008 annual bonus, in accordance with the retention agreement dated February 1, 2007
which guaranteed such annualized bonus through June 30, 2008. The Compensation Committee exercised
its discretion to pay Mr. Klausners bonus in recognition of his efforts in introducing additional
products in the Voyager Education segment and the continued growth of the Learning A-Z and ExploreLearnings product lines, even though the
specific targets set for the Voyager Education segment were not met. The Compensation Committee
also exercised its discretion to provide Mr. Buchardt a bonus in recognition of favorable results
with respect to legal matters that arose following the Companys need for financial restatements. |
114
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The amounts reported in this column for each executive reflect the compensation costs for
financial reporting purposes for the year under SFAS No. 123R for outstanding stock awards (other
than stock options) granted in prior years. These are not amounts paid to or realized by the
executive. Assumptions used in the calculation of these compensation costs are included in Notes
1 and 16 to the Companys audited financial statements included in this Form 10-K for 2008 and
Notes 1 and 15 to the Companys audited financial statements included in the Companys Form 10-K
for 2006 and 2007. However, pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown above do not reflect any
assumption that a portion of this award will be forfeited. |
|
(3) |
|
The amounts reported in this column for each executive reflects the compensation costs for
financial reporting purposes for the year under SFAS No. 123R for stock options granted in prior
years. The 2008 amount for Mr. Klausner includes a stock option expense of $854,076 and a stock
appreciation rights expense of negative $100,712. These are not amounts paid to or realized by the
executive, and no amounts were paid in 2008. Assumptions used in the calculation of these compensation costs are included in Notes
1 and 16 to the Companys audited financial statements included in this Form 10-K for 2008 and
Notes 1 and 15 to the Companys audited financial statements included in the Companys Form 10-K
for 2006 and 2007. However, pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts above do not reflect any assumption
that a portion of the awards will be forfeited and do not reflect a forfeiture of an amount
expensed in a prior year. More information regarding outstanding stock options is set forth in the
2008 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table. |
|
(4) |
|
The payment earned by Mr. Asai in 2008 represents an incentive payment earned in accordance
with the terms of his retention agreement for completing the Companys annual report on Form 10-K
for 2006 and 2007. |
|
(5) |
|
Refer to All Other Compensation Table (and footnotes thereto) for details. |
|
(6) |
|
The executives did not participate in any Company defined benefit pension plan and there were
no above market or preferential earnings with respect to the Companys nonqualified deferred
compensation plans. Information regarding the Companys deferred compensation plans is set forth
under the 2008 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table. |
115
2008 ALL OTHER COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax |
|
|
Perq and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
in lieu of |
|
|
Relocation |
|
|
Reimburse- |
|
|
Personal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Ins. |
|
|
Contributions |
|
|
SERP |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
ment |
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Premiums |
|
|
to 401(k) |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
(2) |
|
|
(3) |
|
|
(4) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard J. Surratt |
|
$ |
2,106 |
|
|
$ |
6,900 |
|
|
$ |
124,477 |
|
|
$ |
76,417 |
|
|
$ |
56,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
266,869 |
|
Ronald Klausner |
|
$ |
1,741 |
|
|
$ |
6,900 |
|
|
$ |
80,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
89,172 |
|
Todd W. Buchardt |
|
$ |
962 |
|
|
$ |
6,900 |
|
|
$ |
101,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
109,451 |
|
David Asai |
|
$ |
373 |
|
|
$ |
6,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42,210 |
|
|
$ |
36,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
85,667 |
|
John Campbell |
|
$ |
478 |
|
|
$ |
6,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,361 |
|
|
$ |
3,500 |
|
|
$ |
12,239 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents cash that would otherwise have been contributed to the executives supplemental
executive retirement benefits account under the Companys Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, but
was distributed directly to the executive as a current cash payment. |
|
(2) |
|
Pursuant to the terms of his February 1, 2007 employment agreement, the Company agreed to
reimburse Mr. Surratt for relocation expenses plus any loss of the sale of his residence in Ann
Arbor, Michigan (up to a maximum of $150,000). |
|
(3) |
|
For Mr. Surratt and Mr. Asai, the tax reimbursement amount represents the tax gross up on
relocation expenses. For Mr. Campbell, the tax reimbursement amount represents the tax gross up on
those items described in footnote (4). |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Campbells benefits include $36 for tax return preparation, $2,864 for home office
equipment, $302 for internet services, and $298 for subscriptions to financial services or
publications. |
116
2008 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
The following table sets forth information regarding the 2008 annual cash incentive programs
and performance-based awards. No stock or options were granted in 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts |
|
|
|
Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
|
Name |
|
Threshold |
|
|
Target |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard J. Surratt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald Klausner |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
375,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
Todd W. Buchardt |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
148,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
David Asai |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
230,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
John Campbell |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
177,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
EMPLOYMENT AND SEVERANCE ARRANGEMENTS
As mentioned in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the Potential Payments upon
Termination or Change of Control, certain executives entered into retention agreements which
addressed bonus and severance. Certain of these retention agreements also provided for the grant
of restricted stock subject to certain vesting requirements. Subsequently, the executives
exchanged their right to restricted stock for a right to a cash award subject to the same vesting
requirements.
Benefits
Executives participate in many of the same benefits as are available to Company employees
generally. Prior to 2007, certain executives were also able to defer the receipt of compensation
under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. The Company also credited the deferral accounts of
such executives with employer contributions of 15% of the executives base salary and bonus as a
supplemental executive retirement benefit. The Compensation Committee determined that for 2007 and
thereafter, both to simplify the Companys benefit structure and to wind down the deferral plans,
it would provide a cash payment to executives rather than provide a supplemental executive
retirement benefit credit under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. For those executives
whose employment is terminated, a pro-rata cash payment for the portion of the year the executive
was employed is made in lieu of a supplemental executive retirement benefit credit.
117
Prior to the negotiation of the retention agreements, the Company provided certain perquisites
to better enable it to attract and retain key executives. As part of the negotiation of the
retention agreements with Messrs. Surratt, Klausner and Buchardt, the Compensation Committee
decided to provide an additional cash amount to executives rather than continue
perquisites to executives with retention agreements and also provided that such additional
cash amounts in lieu of perquisites would not be used to determine bonuses or other benefits
determined by base salary. In addition, because of the unusual circumstances of the relocation of
corporate headquarters, the Company provided in 2008 certain benefits in connection with
commuting costs and limited protection on the sale of a residence in appropriate circumstances.
For example, such benefits were provided to Mr. Surratt in his employment agreement entered into
when he became chief executive officer of the Company.
SEVERANCE
In 2006 and 2007, the Compensation Committee provided more extensive severance protection as
part of the retention agreements negotiated with Messrs. Surratt, Klausner and Buchardt than the
Companys general severance program or what was previously set forth in offer letters. Under the
retention agreements, Mr. Surratt would receive two times his annual base salary for termination of
employment in certain circumstances listed below entitling them to enhanced severance and one and
one-half times his annual base salary for other terminations entitling them to severance under the
retention agreements. An executive is generally entitled to enhanced severance under the retention
agreement if his employment is terminated within two years after (1) a change in control, or (2)
both an acquisition of at least 30% of the Companys outstanding voting stock and a change in the
board of directors. For Mr. Buchardt and Mr. Klausner, the base salary multiplier for severance is
one and one-half times for enhanced severance and one times for other severance qualifying for
payments.
In general, for the executive to obtain any severance the Company had to terminate the
executives employment without cause or the executive had to terminate his employment for good
reason as described in more detail in the Executive Agreements section. For Mr. Buchardts
executive retention agreement, the Committee approved a one-month period between December 29, 2007,
and January 30, 2008, after certain transactions such as the sale of both PQBS and PQIL, during
which the executive could voluntarily terminate employment and be treated as having good reason and
therefore entitled to the enhanced severance. In Mr. Surratts 2007 employment agreement, the
period was delayed six months until between June 30, 2008 and July 31, 2008. In 2008, the Company
extended throughout 2008 such period for Mr. Buchardt in order to encourage Mr. Buchardt to remain
with the Company given his extensive background and knowledge regarding
the Companys legal issues. In 2009, the Company further extended the period during which Mr.
Buchardt could voluntarily terminate employment and be treated as having good reason.
118
As a safeguard for the executives, the retention agreements for Mr. Surratt and Mr. Buchardt
required that an amount equal to the enhanced severance benefits be deposited to a trust after
certain transactions resulting in the trailing 12 month revenues of the retained businesses after
the transactions were less than $170.1 million. After the sale of PQBS and PQIL, this standard was
triggered and amounts sufficient to fund such enhanced severance were deposited in a trust. Mr.
Klausners agreement was entered into after the PQBS and PQIL transaction so such transactions did
not trigger enhanced severance protection or deposit of amounts into a trust for severance.
The retention agreements provide for pro-rata payment of bonuses in the year the executive is
terminated in some circumstances. The Compensation Committee determined that for 2007 and
thereafter, it would provide a cash payment rather than a supplemental executive retirement benefit
credit under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan for the year. For those executives who
participated in the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (Messrs. Surratt, Klausner and Buchardt)
whose employment is terminated during a year, a pro rata cash payment for the portion of the year
the executive was employed is made in lieu of any additional supplemental executive retirement
benefit credit. The retention agreements also provided for certain continuation of benefits under
circumstances entitling the executive to severance.
CHANGE IN CONTROL TRIGGERS AND PARACHUTE EXCISE TAX PROTECTION
In addition, upon a change in control, certain bonuses under the agreements with executive
would be paid. Options other than the 2004 options granted to executives generally vest on a
change in control. The stock appreciation rights granted to Mr. Klausner also vest upon a change
in control.
As the 2004 option grants provided for a tax reimbursement provision if the executive incurred
parachute excise taxes, the retention agreements of Messrs. Surratt, Klausner and Buchardt
maintained that protection for executives, provided that no such gross-up payments were made prior
to certain of the Companys loan agreements being repaid. Such parachute tax gross-up provision
was not included in Mr. Klausners retention agreement although his 2004 option grant, which
remains outstanding, had a parachute tax gross-up provision.
119
2008 OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
The following table summarizes the outstanding options and stock appreciation rights held by
the NEOs at December 31, 2008. No NEO had any unvested or unearned stock awards at December 31,
2008 other than a portion of Mr. Klausners stock appreciation and Mr. Klausners 2004 option
award.
2008 OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END TABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Incentive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised |
|
|
Unexercised |
|
|
Unexercised |
|
|
Option |
|
|
Option |
|
|
|
Date of |
|
|
Option (#): |
|
|
Option (#): |
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Expiration |
|
Name |
|
Grant |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Unexercisable |
|
|
Option (#) (1) |
|
|
Price ($) |
|
|
Date (2) |
|
Richard J. Surratt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald Klausner |
|
|
4/2/2003 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.15 |
|
|
|
4/2/2009 |
|
|
|
|
2/4/2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440,000 |
|
|
|
30.97 |
|
|
|
2/4/2014 |
|
|
|
|
4/24/2007 |
(3) |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.55 |
|
|
|
4/23/2012 |
|
Todd W. Buchardt |
|
|
2/26/1999 |
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.13 |
|
|
|
2/26/2009 |
|
|
|
|
10/12/2000 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.69 |
|
|
|
10/12/2010 |
|
|
|
|
2/28/2001 |
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.95 |
|
|
|
2/28/2011 |
|
|
|
|
3/6/2002 |
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.00 |
|
|
|
3/6/2012 |
|
|
|
|
3/5/2003 |
|
|
|
19,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.31 |
|
|
|
3/5/2009 |
|
David Asai |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Campbell |
|
|
1/12/2004 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.08 |
|
|
|
1/12/2010 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unexercisable unearned options vest (i) based on performance determined on the basis of the
rolling average of the fair market value of a share of the Company Common Stock for a period of
ninety consecutive trading days during the performance period or (ii) otherwise on the seventh year
anniversary of the grant provided the executive remains employed through such period. The stock
price targets are consistent for all participants and range from $36.67 or $46.88 and above. The
performance period for Mr. Klausner and Mr. Buchardt begins on January 1, 2005 and ends April 1.
2009. The performance period for Mr. Surratt begins on the grant date of November 2, 2005 and ends
April 1, 2009. Messrs. Surratt and Buchardt later agreed to a cancellation of their unexercisable
unearned options. |
120
|
|
|
(2) |
|
On August 9, 2006, the Companys Compensation Committee extended the period of time that
Messrs. Klausner and Buchardt may exercise their outstanding vested stock options (other than
their unexercisable unearned option grants) due to involuntary termination of employment by the
Company without cause or resignation for good reason up to 12 months after any such employment
termination but not beyond the original option expiration date. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Klausner received a grant of stock appreciation rights (SAR) with respect to 300,000
shares of Company common stock on April 24, 2007. The base price for the SAR is $8.55, which was
the closing price of a share of the Companys common stock on the grant date. The difference
between the fair market value of a share of the Companys stock and the base price is payable on
exercise in cash. The term of the SAR is five years subject to earlier expiration in the event Mr.
Klausner terminates employment under certain circumstances. Mr. Klausner will vest in 100,000 of
the shares subject to this SAR on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, provided
he remains continuously employed by the Company on each such date. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
vesting of the SAR will fully accelerate on a Change of Control of the Company if he remains
continuously employed on such date. |
2008 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION
The table below describes individual credited earnings, withdrawals, and the aggregate balance
as of the end of the year for each NEO under the Companys deferred compensation plans. No
executive or company contributions were credited to the plan during 2008:
2008 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings in 2008 |
|
|
Withdrawals/ |
|
|
2008 Fiscal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
|
Distributions |
|
|
Year-End |
|
Name |
|
Plan |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
Richard J. Surratt |
|
|
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (1) |
|
|
5,459 |
|
|
|
54,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald Klausner |
|
|
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (1) |
|
|
(31,882 |
) |
|
|
444,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
Todd W. Buchardt |
|
|
Replacement Benefit Plan |
|
|
4,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,955 |
|
David Asai |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Campbell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Executive Deferred Compensation Plan was terminated and all amounts were paid out by the
end of 2008. The Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan credited accounts of participants with deferrals by participants as well
as supplemental executive retirement plan contributions by the Company and adjusted account
balances with earnings. |
|
(2) |
|
The replacement benefit plan was a plan that provided for amounts to be credited to certain
highly compensated employees whose benefits under the Companys profit sharing plan were limited.
No additional contributions were credited after December 31, 2000 under the replacement benefit
plan but participants continue to receive an earnings adjustment. The earnings rate is determined
each October 31 for the subsequent calendar year based on 120% of the 120-month rolling average of
10-year U.S. Treasury Notes. Mr. Buchardts replacement benefit plan distribution will be paid in
a lump sum after his termination of employment. Upon a change of control of the Company, the
replacement benefit plan benefits are funded in a rabbi trust. |
121
POTENTIAL PAYMENT UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE OF CONTROL
Executive Agreements
The Company entered into formal retention agreements with each of the NEOs other than Mr.
Campbell whereby the Company agreed to provide these executives with severance benefits upon
certain terminations of employment. Mr. Klausners retention agreement was entered into in 2007
while the other executives entered into their retention agreements in 2006. The retention
agreements for Mr. Surratt and Mr. Asai were expanded in 2007. Mr. Campbell entered into a
severance letter agreement in 2007.
Retention Agreements
Severance Amounts
Under the retention agreements, if the executives employment is terminated without Cause or
if the executive terminates employment for Good Reason at any time during a two-year period
beginning on a Change of Control of the Company, or an Acquisition of at Least 30% of the
Companys Outstanding Voting Stock and Board Change, the executive would be entitled to the
following enhanced severance benefits from the Company subject to signing a release in a form
satisfactory to the Company: (1) a single lump sum payment equal to a Severance Factor times his
then current base salary, and (2) continued participation for up to a number of years equal to the
Severance Factor in all medical, dental and vision plans in which he participates.
122
If the executives employment is terminated without Cause or the executive terminates
employment for Good Reason and the executive is not entitled to enhanced severance benefits under
the retention agreements as described above, then the Severance Factor is generally reduced. The
Severance Factors for the executives are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Enhanced Severance (years) |
|
|
Regular Severance (years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard J. Surratt |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Ronald Klausner |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Todd W. Buchardt |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Mr. Asais retention agreement provides for severance of continuation of 52 weeks of base pay
and group health insurance benefits at employee rates for such period if Mr. Asais employment is
terminated without Cause or if he terminate for Good Reason.
Executives other than Messrs. Asai and Campbell have tax reimbursement protections for
parachute excise taxes. Certain payments under the retention agreements are subject to such
payments not violating certain terms imposed by the lenders.
Definitions
Change of Control
For purposes of the retention agreements, the term Change of Control of the Company is
defined to include (1) merger or business combinations in which the Companys existing stockholders
do not continue to own more than fifty percent of the Company, (2) stockholder approval of a plan
of liquidation for the Company (this criteria is not included in Mr. Klausners retention
agreement), (3) certain events that result in the persons who are then the incumbent directors of
the Company ceasing to constitute a majority of the Companys Board of Directors and (4) a sale,
lease or transfer of substantially all of the assets of the Company (an Asset Sale). For
purposes of the retention agreements, the term Acquisition of at Least 30% of the Companys
Outstanding Voting Stock and Board Change is defined to mean the acquisition by any person or
group of persons of the Companys voting securities representing 30% or more of the total number of
votes eligible to be cast at any
election of the directors of the Company and a change in the majority of the Board. A sale of
the PQBS or PQIL business was defined as (1) business combinations in which the business existing
stockholders do not continue to own more than fifty percent of the business, (2) the acquisition by
any person or group of persons of the business voting securities representing 50% or more of the
total number of the business voting securities and (3) a sale of substantially all the assets of
the business.
123
The Company determined that an Asset Sale occurred upon the completion of the sale of PQBS and
PQIL and therefore a Change of Control of the Company occurred upon the completion of such sales
(February, 2007) for purposes of the retention agreements other than for Mr. Klausner whose
agreement was entered into after such transaction. As provided by the retention agreements, a
rabbi trust was thereafter established to fund the enhanced severance benefits of Messrs. Surratt
and Buchardt.
Cause
Under the retention agreements, Cause is defined to mean (1) an act of fraud, embezzlement
or theft in connection with the executives duties or in the course of the executives employment;
(2) unreasonable neglect or refusal by the executive to perform the executives material duties
after notice; (3) the executive engages in willful, reckless, or grossly negligent misconduct which
is or may be materially injurious to the Company; or (4) the executives conviction of or plea of
guilty or nolo contendere to a felony. Mr. Asais definition of Cause also includes the
executives failure to cooperate in good faith with an investigation of the Company, its affiliates
or their respective directors, officers or employees, if the Company requested the executives
cooperation.
Good Reason
Good Reason is defined generally under the retention agreements for Messrs. Surratt,
Klausner and Buchardt to mean (1) the executive is no longer a direct report to the Companys Chief
Executive Officer (or for Mr. Surratt, is no longer the Chief Executive Officer), (2) the executive
is assigned any duties inconsistent in any material respect with his position, authority, duties or
responsibilities, or any other action that results in a significant diminution in such position,
authority, duties or responsibilities, unless the action is remedied by the Company within ten days
after receipt of notice, (3) the executives assignment for longer than six months to a location
in excess of fifty miles from the executives then current office, (4) a reduction of the
executives salary, or a reduction of the executives regular bonus target, or (5) material failure
to pay the executives salary, bonus, equity compensation or benefits under the retention agreement
(without substitution of a benefit of at least equal value). Mr. Asais Good Reason definition
is relocation of his principal office location more than 50 miles and for a period within one year
after a change in control, a material reduction in the aggregate dollar amount of base salary or
target bonus opportunity.
124
Solely for the purposes of determining entitlement to enhanced severance in retention
agreements other than the retention agreements of Messrs. Klausner and Asai, Good Reason also
includes: (1) a reduction in the executives rate of total compensation, in the aggregate, after
taking into account the executives salary, bonus, incentive compensation, equity compensation,
fringe benefits, retirement benefits and any other benefits or an adverse change in the form or
timing of the payment of the executives salary, bonus or accrued benefits under the deferred
compensation plan, as in effect prior to a Change of Control of the Company (other than an Asset
Sale or an Acquisition of Greater than 30% of the Companys Outstanding Voting Stock and Board
Change), or (2) the executive resigns from the Company for any reason between December 29, 2007 and
January 30, 2008 following an Asset Sale. The period during which the executive could voluntarily
resign as Good Reason was subsequently renegotiated for Mr. Surratt to be delayed until June 30,
2008 to July 31, 2008 in connection with his becoming the Chief Executive Officer and for Mr.
Buchardt was renegotiated to be throughout 2008 to encourage him to remain with the Company in 2008
and in 2009, further renegotiated to provide for a voluntary resignation as Good Reason at any
time.
The retention agreements provide that Good Reason does not exist due solely to (1) a
diminution of the business of the Company or any of its affiliates, including, without limitation,
a sale or other transfer of property or other assets of the Company or any of its affiliates, or a
reduction in executives business units head count or budget, or (2) a suspension of the
executives position, job functions, authorities, duties and responsibilities while on paid
administrative leave due to a reasonable belief that the executive have engaged in conduct
constituting Cause.
125
SEVERANCE LETTER AGREEMENT
Pursuant to his severance letter agreement, Mr. Campbell is entitled to one year base salary
paid according to the regular payroll cycle and continued group medical, dental and vision
insurance coverage at the same cost as active employees if his employment is terminated
involuntarily without cause prior to December 31, 2009. If an involuntary termination of his
employment occurs effective on or after January 1, 2010, his severance term is reduced from one
year to six months. Pursuant to a 2007 letter agreement, Mr. Campbell is entitled to a long -term
incentive of $150,000 payable $75,000 on each of January 1, 2008 and January 1, 2009. The unpaid
portion of this long-term incentive is accelerated and payable if he is employed upon a change of
control or if the Company involuntarily terminates his employment
without cause. On February 25, 2009, the Compensation Committee approved a
bonus for Mr. Campbell equal to $265,000 payable March 1, 2010 if a change of control
occurs during 2009 and Mr. Campbell does not voluntarily terminate his employment or have
his employment terminated for cause before March 1, 2010.
Subsequent Events
In addition to the bonus approved for Mr. Campbell, the Compensation Committee
on February 25, 2009 approved certain other changes to executive agreements as described
in the Form 8-K filed by the Company on March 3, 2009.
2008 POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE OF CONTROL TABLE
The potential payments upon termination or change of control for NEOs are set forth below.
For purposes of this table, 2008 fiscal year end base salary and 2008 incentive awards were used.
The table below sets forth an estimate of the payments that would have been made to
Messrs. Surratt, Klausner, Buchardt, Asai and Campbell upon a termination of employment or
Change of Control as of December 31, 2008.
2008 POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE OF CONTROL TABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Change |
|
|
Change of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Control |
|
|
Control |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination |
|
|
Termination |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
w/o Cause or |
|
|
w/o Cause or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
for Good |
|
|
for Good |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
Name |
|
Benefit |
|
Reason |
|
|
Reason |
|
|
Death |
|
|
Disability |
|
|
Control |
|
|
Richard J. Surratt |
|
Severance (1) |
|
$ |
1,012,500 |
|
|
$ |
1,350,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Annual Incentive (2) |
|
|
573,500 |
|
|
|
573,500 |
|
|
|
573,500 |
|
|
|
573,500 |
|
|
|
573,500 |
|
|
|
Benefit Continuation (3) |
|
|
15,615 |
|
|
|
20,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280G Tax Gross Up (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: |
|
$ |
1,601,615 |
|
|
$ |
1,943,781 |
|
|
$ |
573,500 |
|
|
$ |
573,500 |
|
|
$ |
573,500 |
|
|
Ronald Klausner |
|
Severance (1) |
|
$ |
537,075 |
|
|
$ |
805,613 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Annual Incentive (2) |
|
|
375,953 |
|
|
|
375,953 |
|
|
|
375,953 |
|
|
|
375,953 |
|
|
|
375,953 |
|
|
|
Benefit Continuation (3) |
|
|
8,797 |
|
|
|
13,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280G Tax Gross Up (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: |
|
$ |
921,825 |
|
|
$ |
1,194,761 |
|
|
$ |
375,953 |
|
|
$ |
375,953 |
|
|
$ |
375,953 |
|
|
Todd W. Buchardt |
|
Severance (1) |
|
$ |
296,656 |
|
|
$ |
444,984 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Annual Incentive (2) |
|
|
148,328 |
|
|
|
148,328 |
|
|
|
148,328 |
|
|
|
148,328 |
|
|
|
148,328 |
|
|
|
Benefit Continuation (3) |
|
|
10,411 |
|
|
|
15,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280G Tax Gross Up (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: |
|
$ |
455,395 |
|
|
$ |
608,928 |
|
|
$ |
148,328 |
|
|
$ |
148,328 |
|
|
$ |
148,328 |
|
|
David Asai |
|
Severance (1) |
|
$ |
230,000 |
|
|
$ |
230,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Annual Incentive (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit Continuation (3) |
|
|
8,797 |
|
|
|
8,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: |
|
$ |
238,797 |
|
|
$ |
238,797 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
John Campbell |
|
Severance (1) |
|
$ |
295,000 |
|
|
$ |
295,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Annual Incentive (5) |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340,500 |
|
|
|
Benefit Continuation (3) |
|
|
7,555 |
|
|
|
7,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: |
|
$ |
377,555 |
|
|
$ |
377,555 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
340,500 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Severance is calculated pursuant to their agreements as though the event occurred
December 31, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Assumes the effective date of termination is December 31, 2008 and that the pro-rata
payment under the Annual Incentive is equal to the award paid for the year. |
126
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The benefit continuation number is an estimate of the cost of health coverage
continuation for the severance factor period described above with respect to the
retention agreements. The number for Mr. Klausner sets forth the estimate of the cost
of health coverage for one year since it was customary for the Company to provide
executives with health coverage for a period corresponding to their severance amount
period. Company provides benefits on active-employee terms during the severance
period. |
|
(4) |
|
Some payments received prior to December 31, 2008 could be treated as contingent on a
change of control, if one were to occur on December 31, 2008. The estimated gross-up
payment includes restoration of excise tax due on any such payments as well as the
parachute portion of the payments shown on this table. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Campbells bonus was guaranteed to be at least 150% of his target bonus if the
Company was sold in 2008. |
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
Messrs. Oberndorf, Nelson, and Schwab are the members of the Compensation Committee
for fiscal year 2008. Mr. Nelson resigned effective February 7, 2008. No member of the
Compensation Committee is an officer of the Company. No member of the Compensation
Committee served as a director or member of the Compensation Committee of another entity,
any of whose executive officers served as a director or member of the Compensation
Committee of the Company.
127
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors fees for the twelve month period commencing July 1st are as
follows:
|
|
|
Annual cash retainer is $30,000 |
|
|
|
Equity based compensation is $20,000 per year |
|
|
|
No meeting fees are paid for regular board meetings. |
The 2008 equity based award was a cash-based award pursuant to the Companys 2003 Strategic
Performance Plan. Each director received 2,619 units, the calculation of which is based on the
$20,000 equity based fee divided by the six-month average stock price from July 1, 2007 to December
31, 2007. For 2008, each director serving as a director on December 31, 2008 received a cash
payment in the amount of $3,667. This payment was calculated by multiplying the 2,619 units times
the closing stock price ($1.40) on December 30, 2008.
The fees for committee membership include $15,000 for each member of the Audit Committee and
an additional $10,000 for the Audit Committee Chairperson. Each member of the Compensation
Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee receives $6,000 and the Chairperson of each
committee receives an additional $10,000. The Company will continue to reimburse directors for
out-of-pocket expenses incurred to attend the meetings.
Mr. Oberndorf, Chairman of the Board of Directors, has waived his right to receive Board of
Director, Committee, and Chairperson Committee fees for 2008. Mr. Oberndorf will continue to
receive payment for expenses incurred to attend the Board meetings.
Please see Related Party Transactions in Item 13 hereof related to Mr. Best.
128
The following table provides information concerning compensation earned or paid to the
Companys non-employee directors who served at any time during 2008.
2008 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid in |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
Awards |
|
|
Awards |
|
|
Total |
|
Name |
|
($)(1) |
|
|
($)(2) |
|
|
($)(3) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randy Best (8) |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
4,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,167 |
|
David G. Brown |
|
|
64,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,667 |
|
Todd S. Nelson (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William E. Oberndorf (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linda Roberts (7) |
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
James P. Roemer (4) |
|
|
39,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,667 |
|
Gary L. Roubos |
|
|
64,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,667 |
|
Frederick J. Schwab |
|
|
54,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,667 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fees earned or paid in cash are comprised of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Award |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual |
|
|
Committee |
|
|
Paid in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retainer |
|
|
Retainer |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
Total |
|
Name |
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randy Best |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
David G. Brown |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
|
3,667 |
|
|
|
64,667 |
|
Todd Nelson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linda Roberts |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
James P. Roemer |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
3,667 |
|
|
|
39,667 |
|
Gary L. Roubos |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
|
3,667 |
|
|
|
64,667 |
|
Frederick J. Schwab |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
3,667 |
|
|
|
54,667 |
|
129
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The amount reported in this column reflects the dollar amount recognized for financial
reporting purposes for the year under SFAS No. 123R for outstanding stock awards (other than
stock options) granted in prior years. These are not amounts paid to or realized by the
Director. However, pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown above do not reflect any assumption that a portion of
the awards will be forfeited. The SFAS No. 123R grant date fair value for such stock grants
which vest over three years was $75,000. As of December 31, 2008, Mr. Best was fully vested
in his restricted stock. |
|
(3) |
|
As of December 31, 2008, each Director has the following aggregate number of options
outstanding: Mr. Brown, 14,121; Mr. Oberndorf, 14,121; Mr. Roemer, 4,284; Mr. Roubos, 14,121;
and Mr. Schwab, 4,284. |
(4) |
|
Based on his service as a former executive of the Company, Mr. Roemer was entitled to
benefits under the Companys nonqualified supplemental retirement plan and replacement benefit
plan. Pursuant to an election provided in 2008 by the Company to all participants in such
plans, Mr. Roemer elected and in 2009 received a discounted lump sum benefit payment under
these plans of an aggregate amount of $2,885,250. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Nelson resigned effective February 7, 2008. |
|
(6) |
|
Mr. Oberndorf waived his rights to compensation as a member of the Board and its committees. |
|
(7) |
|
Dr. Roberts resigned effective August 29, 2008. |
|
(8) |
|
Mr. Best resigned effective November 5, 2008. |
130
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Shareholder Matters.
OWNERSHIP INFORMATION OF FIVE PERCENT HOLDERS
The following table sets forth information with respect to the persons and groups we know of
that beneficially own 5% or more of our shares on March 1, 2009.
Security Ownership of Beneficial Owners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foxhill Capital, LLC (1) |
|
|
4,578,935 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
% |
502 Carnegie Center
Suite 104
Princeton, New Jersey 08540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William E. Oberndorf (2,3) |
|
|
3,524,619 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
% |
SPO Partners & Co.
591 Redwood Highway
Suite 3215
Mill Valley, CA 94941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPO Advisory Corp. (4) |
|
|
3,072,500 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
591 Redwood Highway
Suite 3215
Mill Valley, CA 94941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling Capital Management LLC (5) |
|
|
2,299,530 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
% |
Two Morrocroft Centre
4064 Colony Road, Ste 300
Charlotte, NC 28211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wells Fargo & Company (6) |
|
|
2,938,854 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
% |
420 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, CA 94104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keystone, Inc. (7) |
|
|
2,613,000 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
% |
3100 Texas Commerce Tower
201 Main Street
Fort Worth, TX 76102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley (8) |
|
|
2,363,763 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
1585 Broadway
New York, NY 10036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shamrock Activist Value Fund GP, LLC (9) |
|
|
2,192,272 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
% |
4444 Lakeside Drive
Burbank, CA 91505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Columbia Wanger Asset Management, L.P. (10) |
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
227 West Monroe Street, Ste 3000
Chicago, IL 60606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Pursuant to Schedule 13G filed on January 28 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Pursuant to Schedule 13D/A filed on August 12, 2008. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes 437,998 shares that Mr. Oberndorf may be deemed to beneficially own through his
control of family trusts and also includes through his ownership of options to purchase 14,121
shares that are currently exercisable. |
|
(4) |
|
As general partner of SF Advisory Partners, L.P., SPO Partners II, L.P. and SPO Advisory
Partners L.P., SPO Advisory Corp. may be deemed to share investment and voting control with
respect to these shares. Messrs. William Oberndorf, John Scully, William Patterson and Edward
McDermott are the controlling persons of SPO Advisory Corp. |
|
(5) |
|
Pursuant to Schedule 13G filed on January 22, 2009. |
|
(6) |
|
Pursuant to Schedule 13G filed on January 22, 2009. |
|
(7) |
|
Pursuant to Keystone, Inc.s Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 4) dated February 4, 2003. |
|
(8) |
|
Pursuant to Schedule 13G filed on February 17, 2009. |
|
(9) |
|
Pursuant to Schedule 13D filed on November 4, 2008. |
|
(10) |
|
Pursuant to Schedule 13G filed on December 31, 2006. |
131
OWNERSHIP INFORMATION OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of
Voyager Learning Company Common stock, as of March 1, 2009 of the Companys Directors, the
executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation table above, and the directors and
executive officers as a group. None of the stock options are in-the-money as of the date
of this filing.
Ownership of Directors & Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and Executive Officers |
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Percent (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William E. Oberndorf (1,2) |
|
|
3,524,619 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
% |
Todd Buchardt (5) |
|
|
80,505 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Ronald D. Klausner (3) |
|
|
103,504 |
|
|
|
* |
|
David G. Brown (4) |
|
|
19,550 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Gary L. Roubos (4) |
|
|
18,083 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Frederick Schwab (4) |
|
|
7,197 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Richard Surratt |
|
|
6,840 |
|
|
|
* |
|
James P. Roemer (4) |
|
|
4,284 |
|
|
|
* |
|
All directors and executive officers
as a Group (8 persons) |
|
|
3,764,582 |
|
|
|
12.51 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1%. |
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Oberndorf through relationships with SPO Advisory Corp., SPO Advisory Partners, L.P. and
SF Advisory Partners, L.P., may be deemed to share investment and voting control with respect
to 3,072,500 shares. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 437,998 shares that Mr. Oberndorf may be deemed to beneficially own through his
control of family trusts and includes an additional 14,121 shares granted under the Companys
stock option plans, which are currently exercisable. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes 100,000 option shares for Mr. Klausner granted under the Companys stock option
plans, which are currently exercisable. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes 4,284, 14,121, 14,121,and 4,284 option shares for Mssrs. Roemer,
Roubos, Brown and Schwab, respectively, granted under the Companys stock option plans, which
are currently exercisable. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes 74,700, option shares held by Mr. Buchardt, granted under the Companys stock option
plans, which are currently exercisable. |
|
(6) |
|
Percentage is based upon 30,099,776 aggregate shares of common stock outstanding as adjusted
to reflect options that are currently exercisable. As of the date of this filing, all stock
options beneficially owned by the group are under water because the current stock price is
less than the exercise price for all of the vested options. |
132
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plan
The following table summarizes information, as of December 31, 2008, relating to
equity compensation plans of our Company pursuant to which grants of options, restricted
shares or other rights to acquire shares may be granted from time to time.
2008 Equity Compensation Plan Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities |
|
|
|
Number of securities to be |
|
|
Weighted-average |
|
|
remaining available for |
|
|
|
issued upon exercise of |
|
|
exercise price of |
|
|
future issuance |
|
|
|
outstanding options |
|
|
outstanding options |
|
|
under equity |
|
Plan Category |
|
and rights |
|
|
and rights |
|
|
compensation plans (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved
by security holders |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
$ |
22.82 |
|
|
|
3,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
$ |
22.82 |
|
|
|
3,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes securities reflected in the first column, Number of securities to be issued upon
exercise of outstanding options and rights. |
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
On March 10, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors appointed Randy Best to serve as a
member of the Companys Board of Directors. Effective November 5, 2008, Mr. Best resigned
from VELs Board of Directors. Mr. Bests resignation was not due to any disagreement with
the Company or any matter relating to operations, policies, or practices. Mr. Best was the
Chief Executive Officer, and held 34% of the common stock of VEL immediately prior to the
Companys acquisition of VEL. In connection with the Companys acquisition of VEL, Mr.
Best and the Company entered into a two year Consulting Agreement (the Consulting
Agreement) and a three year Non-Disclosure, Non-Solicitation and Non-Competition
Agreement, both of which became effective on January 31, 2005. As compensation for these
services, Mr. Best received payments of $40,000 per month for the first six months of the
term and $26,666 per month for the last eighteen months of the
term of the Consulting Agreement. Both of these agreements have expired and were not
extended.
133
The Company adopted a formal policy regarding related persons transactions between the
Company and its Directors and Executive Officers on November 5, 2008. The independence
standards used by the Company and the related persons transactions policy can be found on
the Companys website at www.voyagercompany.com.
Director Independence
The Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Brown, Oberndorf, Roemer, Roubos and Schwab
are independent under the requirements of the Companys independence standards. The Board of
Directors presently consists of five members. There are currently five vacancies on the Board.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Companys Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for fiscal 2008 was
Whitley Penn LLP. Such accounting firm is expected to have a representative at the
Companys next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is expected to be available to respond to
appropriate questions at that time and have an opportunity to make a statement if it
desires to do so.
134
Audit Fees
The
following table shows the fees billed through January 31, 2009 by Whitley Penn for
the audit and other services provided by Whitley Penn to the Company in respect of fiscal
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Audit fees (1) |
|
$ |
39,445 |
|
|
$ |
727,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total audit and audit related fees |
|
|
39,445 |
|
|
|
727,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Audit services consisted of the audit of financial statements included in the Companys
fiscal 2007 and 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K including attestation of the effectiveness of the
Companys internal controls over financial reporting and managements assessment thereof. |
Pre-approval of Services by the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee has adopted a policy for pre-approval of audit and permitted
non-audit services by the Companys Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The
Audit Committee will consider annually and, if appropriate, approve the provision of audit
services by its Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and consider and, if
appropriate, pre-approve the provision of certain defined audit and non-audit services.
The Audit Committee will also consider on a case-by-case basis and, if appropriate, approve
specific engagements that are not otherwise pre-approved. The Audit Committee pre-approved
all audit, audit related and permitted non-audit services by the Companys Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm in 2006 and 2007.
Any proposed engagement that does not fit within the definition of a pre-approved
service may be presented to the Audit Committee for consideration at its next regular
meeting or, if earlier consideration is required, to the Audit Committee or one or more of
its members. The member or members to whom such authority is delegated shall report any
specific approval of services at its next regular meeting. The Audit Committee will
regularly review summary reports detailing all services being provided to the Company by
its Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
The Audit Committee has advised the Company that it has determined that the non-audit services
rendered by the Companys Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm during the Companys most
recent fiscal year are compatible with maintaining the independence of such accountants.
135
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) |
1. |
Financial statements: |
The following Consolidated Financial Statements of Voyager Learning Company are
included in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data:
|
|
|
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations Fiscal Years 2008, 2007, and 2006 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets At the end of Fiscal Years 2008 and 2007 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Fiscal Years 2008, 2007, and 2006 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity (Deficit) and Comprehensive Income (Loss) Fiscal Years 2008, 2007, and 2006 |
|
|
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements |
136
|
2. |
|
Financial statement schedules: |
Schedule II: Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
receivable |
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
|
reserve |
|
|
reserve |
|
Balance as of January 1, 2006 |
|
$ |
649 |
|
|
$ |
967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to costs and expenses |
|
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to other accounts (1) |
|
|
1,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-offs |
|
|
(1,947 |
) |
|
|
(492 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
1,773 |
|
|
$ |
1,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to costs and expenses |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
2,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to other accounts (1) |
|
|
2,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-offs |
|
|
(2,830 |
) |
|
|
(996 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,336 |
|
|
$ |
2,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to costs and expenses |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
2,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to other accounts (1) |
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-offs |
|
|
(2,156 |
) |
|
|
(741 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
688 |
|
|
$ |
4,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Charges to other accounts include sales returns. |
All other schedules have been omitted because they are not
required, not applicable, or the required information is otherwise included.
137
3. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report. The exhibit numbers
preceded by an asterisk (*) indicate exhibits previously filed and are hereby incorporated
herein by reference. Exhibits preceded by a plus sign (+) indicate a management contract
or compensatory plan or arrangement.
|
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 2.1 |
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated October 28, 2005 by and among, the Company,
ProQuest Information and Learning Company, and National Archive Publishing Company is
incorporated by reference to ProQuest Companys Form 10-Q dated November 10, 2005, File No.
001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 2.2 |
|
|
Agreement and Plan of merger by and among ProQuest Company, VEL Acquisition Corp.,
PQED Expanded Learning, Inc., and R. Best Associates, Inc. dated as of December 13, 2004 is
incorporated by reference to ProQuest Companys Form 8-K/A dated February 10, 2005, File
No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 2.3 |
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated August 9, 2006 by and between the Company and
Dealer Computer Services, Inc., is incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 8-K
filed August 15, 2006, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 2.4 |
|
|
Stock and Assets Purchase Agreement, dated October 20, 2006 by and between the
Company and Snap-on Incorporated, is incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 8-K
filed October 23, 2006, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 2.8 |
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of November 1, 2006,
by and between ProQuest Company and Snap-on Incorporated, is incorporated by reference to
the Companys Form 8-K filed November 6, 2006, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 2.9 |
|
|
Subscription Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of December 14, 2006, by and
between ProQuest Company and Cambridge Scientific Abstracts, Limited Partnership, are
incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 8-K filed December 20, 2006, File No.
001-07680. |
138
|
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 2.10 |
|
|
Letter Agreement Regarding Subscription Agreement and Plan Of Merger, dated
February 8, 2007, by and between ProQuest Company and Cambridge Scientific Abstracts,
Limited Partnership, is incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 8-K filed February
15, 2007, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 3.1 |
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of ProQuest Company is
incorporated by reference to ProQuest Companys Form 10-K dated March 29, 2002, File No.
001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 3.2 |
|
|
By-laws of ProQuest Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 3.3 |
|
|
Amendment to Bylaws of ProQuest Company adopted on March 1, 2006 is incorporated by
reference to ProQuest Companys Form 8-K dated March 7, 2006, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 3.4 |
|
|
Certificate
of Ownership and Merger of Voyager Learning Company into ProQuest
Company is incorporated by reference to Voyager Learning Companys Form 8-K dated July 2,
2007, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 3.5 |
|
|
Amendment to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws; Change in Fiscal Year is
incorporated by reference to Voyager Learning Companys Form 8-K dated December 26, 2007,
File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 4.1 |
|
|
2002 Note Purchase Agreement dated as of October 1, 2002 ProQuest Company $150
million 5.45% Senior Notes due October 1, 2012 is incorporated by reference to ProQuest
Companys Form 10-Q dated November 12, 2002, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 4.2 |
|
|
2002 Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of October 3, 2002 among ProQuest Company,
the lenders listed therein and Banc of America Securities LLC is incorporated by
reference to ProQuest Companys Form 10-Q dated November 12, 2002, File No.
001-07680. |
139
|
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 4.3 |
|
|
2005 Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of January 31, 2005 among the financial
institutions that are or may from time to time become parties thereto, Standard Federal
Bank, N.A., as administrative agent for the lenders, Bank of America, N.A., and Harris
Trust & Savings Bank as syndication agents for the lenders, and KeyBank National
Association and National City Bank of the Midwest, as documentation agents for the lenders
is incorporated by reference to ProQuest Companys Form 8-K dated February 4, 2005, File
No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 4.4 |
|
|
First Amendment dated as of January 31, 2005 to ProQuest Companys existing 2002
Note Purchase Agreement dated as of October 1, 2002 is incorporated by reference to
ProQuest Companys Form 8-K dated February 4, 2005, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 4.5 |
|
|
2005 Note Purchase Agreement dated as of January 31, 2005, ProQuest Company $175
million 5.38% Senior Notes due January 31, 2015 is incorporated by reference to ProQuest
Companys Form 8-K dated February 4, 2005, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 4.6 |
|
|
Waiver and Omnibus Amendment Agreement dated as of May 2, 2006 to the 2005
Revolving Credit Agreement Dated as of January 31, 2005 and 2002 Note Purchase Agreement
Dated as of October 1, 2002 and 2005 Note Purchase Agreement dated as of January 31, 2005
is incorporated by reference to ProQuest Companys Form 8-K dated May 8, 2006, File No.
001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 4.7 |
|
|
Guaranty and Collateral Agreement dated as of May 2, 2006 among ProQuest Company,
as the Company, and The Various Financial Institutions Party Hereto, as Lenders, and
LaSalle Bank Midwest National Association, as Collateral Agent is incorporated by reference
to ProQuest Companys Form 8-K dated May 8, 2006, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 4.8 |
|
|
2006 Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of May 2, 2006 among ProQuest Company, as
the Company, and The Various Financial Institutions Party Hereto, as Lenders, and ING
Investment Management LLC, as Administrative Agent is incorporated by reference to ProQuest
Companys Form 8-K dated May 8, 2006, File No. 001-07680. |
140
|
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 4.9 |
|
|
Collateral Agency And Intercreditor Agreement dated as of May 2, 2006 among The
Lenders, The Noteholders and LaSalle Bank Midwest National Association, as Collateral Agent
is incorporated by reference to ProQuest Companys Form 8-K dated May 8, 2006, File No.
001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 4.10 |
|
|
Waiver and Omnibus Amendment Agreement dated as of October 20, 2006 to the 2005
Revolving Credit Agreement Dated as of January 31, 2005 and the 2006 Revolving Credit
Agreement Dated as of May 2, 2006 and 2002 Note Purchase Agreement Dated as of October 1,
2002 and 2005 Note Purchase Agreement dated as of January 31, 2005 is incorporated by
reference to ProQuest Companys Form 8-K dated October 25, 2006, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.1 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Profit Sharing Retirement Plan is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Bell & Howell Companys (f/k/a Bell & Howell Operating
Company) Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended, Registration No. 33-63556. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.2 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Replacement Benefit Plan is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Bell & Howell Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, as
amended, Registration No. 33-63556. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.3 |
|
|
Supplemental Retirement Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3
to Bell & Howell Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended, Registration No.
33-63556. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.4 |
|
|
Management Incentive Bonus Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.5 to Bell & Howell Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended,
Registration No. 33-63556. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.5 |
|
|
Long Term Incentive Plan II, 1993-1996, is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit to Bell & Howell Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended,
Registration No. 33-89992. |
141
|
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.6 |
|
|
Deferred Benefit Trust is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to
Bell & Howell Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended, Registration No.
33-63556. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 10.7 |
|
|
Shareholders Agreement dated May 10, 1988 as amended, among certain Management
Stockholders (as defined therein) and Investor Shareholders (as defined therein) is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Bell & Howell Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1, as amended, Registration No. 33-59994. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 10.8 |
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of May 10, 1988 by and among Bell & Howell
Group, Inc., and each of the Purchasers referred to therein is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Bell & Howell Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, as
amended, Registration No. 33-63556. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.9 |
|
|
2003 ProQuest Strategic Performance Plan is incorporated by reference to
ProQuest Companys S-8 dated August 28, 2003, File No. 333-101186. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 10.10 |
|
|
Supplement to Fourth Amendment to the Shareholders Agreement dated May 10, 1988
as amended, among certain Management Stockholders (as defined therein) and Investor
Shareholders (as defined therein) is incorporated herein by reference to Bell & Howell
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended, Registration No. 33-89992. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.11 |
|
|
Bell & Howell Company Executive Deferred Compensation Plan is incorporated by
reference to ProQuest Companys Form 10-K dated March 27, 2003, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.11A |
|
|
Supplement A to Bell & Howell Company Executive Deferred Compensation Plan is
incorporated by reference to ProQuest Companys Form 10-K dated March 27, 2003, File No.
001-07680. |
142
|
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.12 |
|
|
Bell & Howell Profit Sharing Retirement Plan and Bell & Howell Associate Stock
Purchase Plan, is incorporated herein by reference to Bell & Howell Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 33-99982. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.13 |
|
|
Incentive Compensation Agreement dated December 31, 2000 by and between Bell &
Howell Company and James Roemer is incorporated by reference to ProQuest Companys Form
10-K dated March 27, 2003, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.13A |
|
|
Incentive Compensation Agreement Amendment dated December 20, 2001 by an
between Bell & Howell Company and James Roemer is incorporated by reference to ProQuest
Companys Form 10-K dated March 27, 2003, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.14 |
|
|
Bell & Howell Company Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement dated December 31,
2000 by Bell & Howell Company and James Roemer is incorporated by reference to ProQuest
Companys Form 10-K dated March 27, 2003, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.15 |
|
|
Multi-year Stock Option Grant is incorporated by reference to ProQuest
Companys Form 10-Q dated November 12, 2004, File No. 001-07680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.16 |
|
|
Consulting Agreement between Randy Best and ProQuest Company dated December 13,
2004 is incorporated by reference to ProQuest Companys Form 8-K dated March 16, 2005, File
No. 001-03246. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 10.17 |
|
|
Non-compete Agreement between Randy Best and ProQuest Company dated December 13,
2004 is incorporated by reference to ProQuest Companys Form 8-K dated March 16, 2005, File
No. 001-03246. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.18 |
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for 2003 ProQuest Company Strategic
Performance Plan is incorporated by reference to ProQuest Companys Form 8-K dated March 16,
2005, File No. 001-03246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 10.19 |
|
|
Office Lease dated November 10, 2004 between Transwestern Great Lakes, L.P., as
Landlord and ProQuest Company, as Tenant is incorporated by reference to ProQuest Companys
Form 10-K dated March 17, 2005, File No. 001-07680. |
143
|
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 10.20 |
|
|
Master Services Agreement dated January 1, 2005 between ProQuest Company and
International Business Machines Corporation is incorporated by reference to ProQuest
Companys Form 10-K dated March 17, 2005, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.21 |
|
|
Description of Compensatory Arrangements Applicable to Named Executive Officers
for 2004 and 2005 is incorporated by reference to ProQuest Companys Form 10K dated March
17, 2005, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.22 |
|
|
Bonus agreement dated August 22, 2005 between ProQuest Company and Andrew
Wyszkowski is incorporated by reference to Voyager Learning Companys Form 10-K dated
August 31, 2007, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.23 |
|
|
Offer letter to Richard Surratt is incorporated by reference to ProQuest
Companys Form 8-K dated October 11, 2005, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.24 |
|
|
Offer letter to Ronald Klausner is incorporated by reference to ProQuest
Companys Form 8-K dated October 11, 2005, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.25 |
|
|
Offer letter to David Prichard is incorporated by reference to ProQuest
Companys Form 8-K dated October 11, 2005, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.26 |
|
|
Stock option grant to Richard Surratt is incorporated by reference to ProQuest
Companys Form 8-K dated October 11, 2005, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.27 |
|
|
Stock option grant to David Prichard is incorporated by reference to ProQuest
Companys Form 8-K dated October 11, 2005, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 10.28 |
|
|
Electronic Catalog Data License Agreement, dated September 1, 1999, by and among,
the Company, Bell & Howell Publications Systems Company, and General Motors Corporation is
incorporated by reference to ProQuest Companys Form 10-Q dated November 10, 2005, File No.
001-07680. |
144
|
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 10.29 |
|
|
Service Contract for Information Technology and Related Services, dated August 8,
2005, by and among the Company, ProQuest Business Solutions, Inc. and General Motors
Corporation is incorporated by reference to ProQuest Companys Form 10-Q dated November 10,
2005, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 10.30 |
|
|
Manufacturing Agreement, dated October 28, 2005, by and among the Company,
ProQuest Information and Learning Company, and National Archive Publishing Company is
incorporated by reference to ProQuest Companys Form 10-Q dated November 10, 2005, File No.
001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.31 |
|
|
Transition agreement with Kevin Gregory is incorporated by reference to
ProQuest Companys Form 8-K dated December 14, 2005, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.32 |
|
|
Consulting agreement with Kevin Gregory is incorporated by reference to
ProQuest Companys Form 8-K dated December 14, 2005, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.33 |
|
|
ProQuest Company Separation Benefits Plan is incorporated by reference to
ProQuest Companys Form 8-K dated December 14, 2005, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 10.34 |
|
|
2006 IBM agreement dated February 15, 2006 between ProQuest Company and
International Business Machines Corporation is incorporated by reference to Voyager
Learning Companys Form 10-K dated August 31, 2007, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.35 |
|
|
Retention agreements dated July 13, 2006 between ProQuest Company and Richard
Surratt, Todd Buchardt, and Linda Longo-Kazanova is incorporated by reference to Voyager
Learning Companys Form 10-K dated August 31, 2007, File No. 001-07680. |
145
|
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.36 |
|
|
Compensation agreements dated August 8, 2006 between ProQuest Company and David
Prichard, dated August 9, 2006 between ProQuest Company and Andrew Wyszkowski is
incorporated by reference to Voyager Learning Companys Form 10-K dated August 31, 2007,
File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.37 |
|
|
2006 Performance Goals dated September 6, 2006 is incorporated by reference to
Voyager Learning Companys Form 10-K dated August 31, 2007, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 10.38 |
|
|
Transaction Services Agreement, dated November 28, 2006, by and between ProQuest
Company and Snap-on Incorporated, is incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 8-K
filed December 4, 2006, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 10.39 |
|
|
Restricted Covenants Agreement, dated November 28, 2006, by and between ProQuest
Company and Snap-on Incorporated, is incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 8-K
filed December 4, 2006, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 10.40 |
|
|
Amended Compensation Agreements dated January 18, 2007 between ProQuest Company
and Richard Surratt, David Prichard, Andrew Wyszkowski, Todd Buchardt, and Linda
Longo-Kazanova is incorporated by reference to Voyager Learning Companys Form 10-K dated
August 31, 2007, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.41 |
|
|
Amendment to Richard Surratts Employment Letter, dated February 1, 2007, is
incorporated by reference to ProQuest Companys Form 8-K filed February 1, 2007, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.42 |
|
|
Transition Agreement with David Prichard is incorporated by reference to
ProQuest Companys Form 8-K filed February 15, 2007, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 10.43 |
|
|
Letter Agreement regarding Subscription Agreement and Plan of Merger is
incorporated by reference to ProQuest Companys Form 8-K filed February 15, 2007, File No.
001-07680. |
146
|
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.44 |
|
|
Termination of stock option grants to Richard Surratt and Todd Buchardt is
incorporated by reference to ProQuest Companys Form 8-K dated March 22, 2007, File No.
001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.45 |
|
|
Retention agreement dated April 24, 2007, between ProQuest Company and Ronald
Klausner is incorporated by reference to Voyager Learning Companys Form 10-K dated August
31, 2007, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 10.46 |
|
|
Tri-Party agreement by and among Transwestern Great Lakes, L.P., Voyager Learning
Company, and ProQuest LLC is incorporated by reference to Voyager Learning Companys Form
8-K dated January 31, 2008, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 10.47 |
|
|
Lease Termination agreement by and between Transwestern Great Lakes, L.P., and
ProQuest LLC, as successor in interest to ProQuest Company is incorporated by reference to
Voyager Learning Companys Form 8-K dated January 31, 2008, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 10.48 |
|
|
2nd Amendment Agreement by and among Transwestern Great Lakes, L.P., and Voyager
Learning Company, formerly known as ProQuest Company, and ProQuest LLC, is incorporated by
reference to Voyager Learning Companys Form 8-K dated January 31, 2008, File No.
001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 10.49 |
|
|
Sublease Agreement by and among ProQuest LLC, and Voyager Learning Company is
incorporated by reference to Voyager Learning Companys Form 8-K dated January 31, 2008,
File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 10.50 |
|
|
Amendment to Executive Letter Agreement with Todd Buchardt is incorporated by
reference to Voyager Learning Companys Form 8-K dated January 31, 2008, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 10.51 |
|
|
Memorandum of Understanding dated July 22, 2008 by the parties to the Consolidated Shareholder derivative action styled In
re ProQuest Company Shareholder Derivative Litigation is incorporated by
reference to Voyager Learning Companys Form 8-K dated July 23, 2008, File No. 001-07680. |
147
|
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 10.52 |
|
|
Memorandum of Understanding dated December 3, 2008 by the parties to the Consolidated
Shareholder derivative action styled In re ProQuest Company Shareholder Derivative
Litigation is incorporated by reference to Voyager Learning Companys Form 8-K dated
February 27, 2009, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ 10.53 |
|
|
Compensation
agreement dated March 4, 2009, between Voyager Expanded Learning and John
Campbell. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ 10.54 |
|
|
Compensation
agreements dated November 30, 2006 and March 14, 2007, between
ProQuest Company and David Asai. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 14.1 |
|
|
ProQuest Company Finance Code of Ethics is incorporated by reference to ProQuest
Companys Form 10-K dated March 27, 2003, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 16.1 |
|
|
Letter from KPMG Termination of appointment as principal accountant for ProQuest
Profit Sharing Retirement Plan is incorporated by reference to ProQuest Companys Form 8-K
dated June 2, 2005, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 16.2 |
|
|
Letter from KPMG LLP confirming termination of appointment as the Companys
Independent Registered Public Accountant is incorporated by reference to Voyager Learning
Companys Form 8-K dated November 15, 2007, and Form 8-K/A dated December 19, 2007, File
No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* + 17.1 |
|
|
Aldworth Separation Agreement, dated February 1, 2007, is incorporated by
reference to ProQuest Companys Form 8-K dated February 1, 2007, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 17.2 |
|
|
Michael S. Geltzeiler resignation letter, dated March 19, 2007, is incorporated by
reference to ProQuest Companys Form 8-K dated March 22, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 17.3 |
|
|
Todd Nelson resignation letter, dated February 7, 2008 is incorporated by
reference to Voyager Learning Companys Form 8-K dated February 8, 2008, File No. 001-07680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 17.4 |
|
|
Dr. Linda Roberts resignation letter dated August
29, 2008 is incorporated by reference to Voyager Learning Companys Form 8-K
dated September 2, 2008, File No. 001-07680. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
Subsidiaries of Voyager Learning Company. |
148
|
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
Consent of Whitley Penn LLP. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Section 302 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Section 302 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Richard J. Surratt, President and Chief Executive Officer of Voyager
Learning Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Bradley C. Almond, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and
Assistant Secretary of Voyager Learning Company, Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 99.1 |
|
|
Memorandum of Understanding regarding the proposed settlement of the Companys
Securities Litigation case is incorporated by reference to Voyager Learning Companys Form
8-K dated July 23, 2008, File No. 001-07680. |
149
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, therefore
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: March 5, 2009 |
Voyager Learning Company
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Richard J. Surratt
|
|
|
|
Richard J. Surratt |
|
|
|
President and
Chief Executive Officer |
|
150
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
Signature
Title
Date
|
|
|
/s/ Richard J. Surratt |
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
March 5, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Bradley C. Almond |
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
March 5, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David G. Brown |
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
March 5, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William E. Oberndorf |
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
March 5, 2009 |
|
|
151
|
|
|
/s/ James P. Roemer |
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
March 5, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gary L. Roubos |
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
March 5, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Frederick J. Schwab |
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
March 5, 2009 |
|
|
152
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.53 |
|
|
Compensation
agreement dated March 4, 2009, between Voyager Expanded Learning and John
Campbell. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.54 |
|
|
Compensation
agreements dated November 30, 2006 and March 14, 2007, between
ProQuest Company and David Asai. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
Subsidiaries of Voyager Learning Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
Consent of Whitley Penn LLP. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Section 302 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Section 302 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Richard J. Surratt, President and Chief Executive Officer of Voyager
Learning Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Bradley C. Almond, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
and Assistant Secretary of Voyager Learning Company, Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |