10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009,
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 |
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number 0-12126
FRANKLIN FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
PENNSYLVANIA
|
|
25-1440803 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
20 SOUTH MAIN STREET (P.O. BOX 6010), CHAMBERSBURG, PA 17201-0819
(Address of principal executive offices)
717/264-6116
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act) Yes o No þ
There were 3,833,947 outstanding shares of the Registrants common stock as of April 30, 2009.
Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
14,169 |
|
|
$ |
16,505 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
15,860 |
|
|
|
16,713 |
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
140,246 |
|
|
|
147,559 |
|
Restricted stock |
|
|
6,482 |
|
|
|
6,482 |
|
Loans |
|
|
696,773 |
|
|
|
676,217 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(7,843 |
) |
|
|
(7,357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loans |
|
|
688,930 |
|
|
|
668,860 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
15,908 |
|
|
|
15,625 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
19,039 |
|
|
|
18,875 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
9,159 |
|
|
|
9,152 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
2,812 |
|
|
|
2,929 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
16,836 |
|
|
|
16,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
915,272 |
|
|
$ |
902,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand (non-interest bearing) |
|
$ |
78,322 |
|
|
$ |
86,954 |
|
Savings and interest checking |
|
|
347,531 |
|
|
|
335,418 |
|
Time |
|
|
228,552 |
|
|
|
204,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits |
|
|
654,405 |
|
|
|
627,341 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
68,728 |
|
|
|
64,312 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,850 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
105,218 |
|
|
|
106,141 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
13,673 |
|
|
|
12,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
842,024 |
|
|
|
829,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $1 par value per share, 15,000 shares
authorized
with 4,299 shares issued, and 3,834 shares and 3,825
shares
outstanding at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively |
|
|
4,299 |
|
|
|
4,299 |
|
Capital stock without par value, 5,000 shares authorized
with no shares issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
32,854 |
|
|
|
32,883 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
53,194 |
|
|
|
52,126 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(8,773 |
) |
|
|
(7,757 |
) |
Treasury stock, 465 shares and 474 shares at cost at
March 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
(8,326 |
) |
|
|
(8,492 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
73,248 |
|
|
|
73,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
915,272 |
|
|
$ |
902,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
9,192 |
|
|
$ |
9,643 |
|
Interest and dividends on investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable interest |
|
|
1,089 |
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
Tax exempt interest |
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
Dividend income |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
Deposits and obligations of other banks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
10,812 |
|
|
|
11,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
2,482 |
|
|
|
2,856 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
3,593 |
|
|
|
4,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
7,219 |
|
|
|
7,514 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
6,626 |
|
|
|
7,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment and trust services fees |
|
|
894 |
|
|
|
915 |
|
Loan service charges |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
Mortgage banking activities |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
Deposit service charges and fees |
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
Other service charges and fees |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
Equity method investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
Other |
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Impairment writedown on equity securities |
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
(222 |
) |
Securities gains, net |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
2,287 |
|
|
|
2,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
3,153 |
|
|
|
3,101 |
|
Net occupancy expense |
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
Furniture and equipment expense |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
Advertising |
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
Legal and professional fees |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
Pennsylvania bank shares tax |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
Intangible amortization |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
FDIC insurance |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Other |
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
6,150 |
|
|
|
5,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before federal income taxes |
|
|
2,763 |
|
|
|
3,453 |
|
Federal income tax expense |
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,101 |
|
|
$ |
2,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
Cash dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
4,299 |
|
|
$ |
32,620 |
|
|
$ |
47,946 |
|
|
$ |
664 |
|
|
$ |
(7,887 |
) |
|
$ |
77,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,532 |
|
Unrealized loss on securities,
net of reclassification adjustments and taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(621 |
) |
Unrealized loss on hedging activities,
net of reclassification adjustments and taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared, $.26 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(997 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(997 |
) |
Cumulative adjustment for change in accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(422 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(422 |
) |
Acquisition of 17,648 shares of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
(419 |
) |
Treasury shares issued to dividend reinvestment plan, 7,327 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
Stock option compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
4,299 |
|
|
$ |
32,694 |
|
|
$ |
49,059 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
(8,178 |
) |
|
$ |
77,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
4,299 |
|
|
$ |
32,883 |
|
|
$ |
52,126 |
|
|
$ |
(7,757 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,492 |
) |
|
$ |
73,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,101 |
|
Unrealized loss on securities,
net of reclassification adjustments and taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,202 |
) |
Unrealized gain on hedging activities,
net of reclassification adjustments and taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared, $.27 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,033 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,033 |
) |
Acquisition of 3,000 shares of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
Treasury shares issued to dividend reinvestment plan, 12,049 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
Stock option compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
4,299 |
|
|
$ |
32,854 |
|
|
$ |
53,194 |
|
|
$ |
(8,773 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,326 |
) |
|
$ |
73,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
March 31 |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,101 |
|
|
$ |
2,532 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
Net accretion of loans and investment securities |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
Stock option compensation expense |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Amortization and net change in mortgage servicing rights
valuation |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
Net realized gains on sales of securities |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(329 |
) |
Impairment writedown on equity securities |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
Loans originated for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,113 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,632 |
|
Gain on sales of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
Net loss on sale or disposal of other real estate/other
repossessed assets |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
(166 |
) |
Proceeds from surrender of life insurance policy |
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Loss on equity method investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
166 |
|
Decrease (increase) in interest receivable and other assets |
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
(650 |
) |
Increase in interest payable and other liabilities |
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
4,308 |
|
|
|
3,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for
sale |
|
|
2,964 |
|
|
|
3,254 |
|
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities
available for sale |
|
|
5,120 |
|
|
|
14,774 |
|
Net increase in restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(733 |
) |
Purchase of investment securities available for sale |
|
|
(2,687 |
) |
|
|
(10,402 |
) |
Net increase in loans |
|
|
(20,754 |
) |
|
|
(17,628 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(609 |
) |
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(15,966 |
) |
|
|
(10,954 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in demand deposits, NOW accounts
and savings accounts |
|
|
3,481 |
|
|
|
(9,591 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in certificates of deposit |
|
|
23,583 |
|
|
|
(3,674 |
) |
Net (decrease) increase in short term borrowings |
|
|
(14,434 |
) |
|
|
8,590 |
|
Long-term debt payments |
|
|
(1,183 |
) |
|
|
(2,648 |
) |
Long-term debt advances |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
15,057 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(1,033 |
) |
|
|
(997 |
) |
Common stock issued to dividend reinvestment plan |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
Purchase of treasury shares |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
10,805 |
|
|
|
6,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(853 |
) |
|
|
(1,045 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents as of January 1 |
|
|
16,713 |
|
|
|
25,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents as of March 31 |
|
$ |
15,860 |
|
|
$ |
24,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits and other borrowed funds |
|
$ |
3,323 |
|
|
$ |
4,120 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
$ |
622 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
6
FRANKLIN FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION and SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Franklin Financial Services
Corporation (the Corporation), and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Farmers and Merchants Trust
Company of Chambersburg (the Bank), Franklin Financial Properties Corp., and Franklin Future Fund
Inc. Farmers and Merchants Trust Company of Chambersburg is a commercial bank that has one
wholly-owned subsidiary, Franklin Realty Services Corporation. Franklin Realty Services
Corporation is an inactive real-estate brokerage company. Franklin Financial Properties Corp.
holds real estate assets that are leased by the Bank. Franklin Future Fund Inc. is a non-bank
investment company. The activities of nonbank entities are not significant to the consolidated
totals. All significant intercompany transactions and account balances have been eliminated.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring
adjustments) necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position, results of
operations, and cash flows as of March 31, 2009, and for all other periods presented have been
made.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in consolidated financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed
or omitted. It is suggested that these consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction
with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Corporations
2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated results of operations for the period ended March
31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.
The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete consolidated financial
statements.
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include Cash and due from
banks, interest-bearing deposits in other banks and Federal funds sold. Generally, Federal funds
are purchased and sold for one-day periods.
Earnings per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding
during each period end. A reconciliation of the weighted average shares outstanding used to
calculate basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic) |
|
|
3,827 |
|
|
|
3,838 |
|
Impact of common stock equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding (diluted) |
|
|
3,827 |
|
|
|
3,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
Note 2 Recent Accounting Pronouncements
FAS 157-4 Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability
have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly
In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP) No. FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or
Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP FAS
157-4). FASB Statement 157, Fair Value Measurements, defines fair value as the price that would be
received to sell the asset or transfer the liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a
forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under
current market conditions. FSP FAS 157-4 provides additional guidance on determining when the
volume and level of activity for the asset or liability has significantly decreased. The FSP also
includes guidance on identifying circumstances when a transaction may not be considered orderly.
FSP FAS 157-4 provides a list of factors that a reporting entity should evaluate to determine
whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or
liability in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. When the reporting
entity concludes there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the
asset or liability, further analysis of the information from that market is needed and significant
adjustments to the related prices may be necessary to estimate fair value in accordance with
Statement 157.
This FSP clarifies that when there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of
activity for the asset or liability, some transactions may not be orderly. In those situations, the
entity must evaluate the weight of the evidence to determine whether the transaction is orderly.
The FSP provides a list of circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. A
transaction price that is not associated with an orderly transaction is given little, if any,
weight when estimating fair value.
This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009,
with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. An entity early adopting
FSP FAS 157-4 must also early adopt FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. The Corporation is currently reviewing the effect this new
pronouncement will have on its consolidated financial statements and the Corporation did not adopt
the pronouncement early.
FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation
of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2). FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2
clarifies the interaction of the factors that should be considered when determining whether a debt
security is other-than-temporarily impaired. For debt securities, management must assess whether
(a) it has the intent to sell the security and (b) it is more likely than not that it will be
required to sell the security prior to its anticipated recovery. These steps are done before
assessing whether the entity will recover the cost basis of the investment. Previously, this
assessment required management to assert it has both the intent and the ability to hold a security
for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in fair value to avoid
recognizing an other-than-temporary impairment. This change does not affect the need to forecast
recovery of the value of the security through either cash flows or market price.
8
In instances when a determination is made that an other-than-temporary impairment exists but
the investor does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not more likely than not that it
will be required to sell the debt security prior to its anticipated recovery, FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS
124-2 changes the
presentation and amount of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in the income
statement. The other-than-temporary impairment is separated into (a) the amount of the total
other-than-temporary impairment related to a decrease in cash flows expected to be collected from
the debt security (the credit loss) and (b) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment
related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to
the credit loss is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment
related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income.
This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009,
with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. An entity early adopting
FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 must also early adopt FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the
Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly. The Corporation is currently reviewing the effect
this new pronouncement will have on its consolidated financial statements and the Corporation did
not adopt the pronouncement early.
FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments (FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1). FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 amends
FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to require
disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly
traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. This FSP also amends APB Opinion
No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require those disclosures in summarized financial
information at interim reporting periods.
This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009,
with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. An entity early adopting
FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 must also early adopt FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the
Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly and FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and
Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. The Corporation is currently reviewing the
effect this new pronouncement will have on its consolidated financial statements and the
Corporation did not adopt the pronouncement early.
SFAS No. 141 (R) Business Combinations
FASB Statement No. 141 (R) Business Combinations was issued in December of 2007. This
Statement establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and
any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. The Statement also provides guidance for recognizing
and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to
disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects
of the business combination. The guidance will become effective as of the beginning of a companys
fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. This new pronouncement will impact the Corporations
accounting for business combinations completed beginning January 1, 2009.
SFAS No. 161 Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment of
FASB Statement No. 133
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activitiesan amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (Statement 161). Statement 161
requires entities that utilize derivative instruments to provide qualitative disclosures about
their objectives and strategies for using such instruments, as well as any details of
credit-risk-related contingent features contained within derivatives. Statement 161 also requires
entities to disclose additional information about the amounts and location of derivatives located
within the financial statements, how the provisions of SFAS 133 has been applied, and the impact
that hedges have on an entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash
flows. Statement 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November
15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Corporation adopted Statement 161 effective with
the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
9
FSP FAS 142-3 Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 142-3, Determination of the
Useful Life of Intangible Assets. This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in
developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142).
The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair
value of the asset under SFAS 141R, and other GAAP. This FSP is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. Early adoption is prohibited. The Corporation does not expect the new pronouncement to have
a material effect on its consolidated financial statements. The Corporation adopted Statement 142
effective with the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
FASB Staff Position (FSP) 157-3Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for
That Asset Is Not Active
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a
Financial Asset When The Market for That Asset Is Not Active (FSP 157-3), to clarify the
application of the provisions of SFAS 157 in an inactive market and how an entity would determine
fair value in an inactive market. FSP 157-3 was effective upon issuance. The application of the
provisions of FSP 157-3 did not materially affect our results of operations or financial condition
as of and for the periods ended March 31, 2009.
FSP FAS 132(R)-1 Employers Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets. This FSP amends SFAS 132(R), Employers Disclosures about
Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits, to provide guidance on an employers disclosures about
plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The disclosures about plan
assets required by this FSP shall be provided for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The
Corporation is currently reviewing the effect this new pronouncement will have on its consolidated
financial statements.
10
Note 3 Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive
income includes unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and derivatives and
the change in plan assets and benefit obligations on the Banks pension plan, net of tax, that are
recognized as separate components of shareholders equity.
The components of comprehensive income and related tax effects are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
2,101 |
|
|
$ |
2,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses arising during the period |
|
|
(2,018 |
) |
|
|
(834 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in net income |
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (losses) |
|
|
(1,821 |
) |
|
|
(941 |
) |
Tax effect |
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of tax amount |
|
|
(1,202 |
) |
|
|
(621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Tax effect |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of tax amount |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(1,016 |
) |
|
|
(624 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive Income |
|
$ |
1,085 |
|
|
$ |
1,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss included in shareholders equity
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on securities |
|
$ |
(6,292 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,471 |
) |
Tax effect |
|
|
2,139 |
|
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of tax amount |
|
|
(4,153 |
) |
|
|
(2,951 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on derivatives |
|
|
(2,197 |
) |
|
|
(2,477 |
) |
Tax effect |
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of tax amount |
|
|
(1,449 |
) |
|
|
(1,635 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated pension adjustment |
|
|
(4,805 |
) |
|
|
(4,805 |
) |
Tax effect |
|
|
1,634 |
|
|
|
1,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of tax amount |
|
|
(3,171 |
) |
|
|
(3,171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(8,773 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,757 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
Note 4 Guarantees
The Corporation does not issue any guarantees that would require liability recognition or
disclosure, other than its standby letters of credit. Standby letters of credit are conditional
commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.
Generally, all letters of credit, when issued, have expiration dates within one year. The credit
risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as those that are involved in
extending loan facilities to customers. The Bank generally holds collateral and/or personal
guarantees supporting these commitments. The Bank had $32.1 million of standby letters of credit
as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Management believes that the proceeds
obtained through a liquidation of collateral and the enforcement of guarantees would be sufficient
to cover the potential amount of future payments required under the corresponding guarantees. The
amount of the liability as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 for guarantees under standby
letters of credit issued was not material.
Note 5 Pensions
The components of pension expense for the periods presented are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(232 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost (benefit) |
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bank expects its pension expense to increase by more than $500 thousand in 2009 solely as
a result of the low rate environment and its affect on plan performance. The Bank expects to
contribute $258 thousand to its pension plan for 2009. This amount represents the minimum required
contribution as defined in the Pension Protection Act.
Note 6 Fair Value Measurements
Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Corporations financial
instruments; however, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. Therefore, for
substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates herein are not necessarily
indicative of the amounts the Corporation could have realized in a sales transaction on the dates
indicated. The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of their respective year-ends
and have not been re-evaluated or updated for purposes of these financial statements subsequent to
those respective dates. As such, the estimated fair values of these financial instruments
subsequent to the respective reporting dates maybe different than the amounts reported at each
year-end.
12
The Corporation adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157) for financial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2008. SFAS 157
establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure
fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable
inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under SFAS 157 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1:
|
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date
for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2:
|
|
Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either
directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3:
|
|
Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the
fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported with little or no market activity). |
An assets or liabilitys level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level
of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
For financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the fair value measurements
by level within the fair value hierarchy used at March 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Asset Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
$ |
140,246 |
|
|
$ |
3,391 |
|
|
$ |
136,855 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
140,246 |
|
|
$ |
3,391 |
|
|
$ |
136,855 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
2,197 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,197 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
2,197 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,197 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate the fair
value.
Investment securities: Level 1 securities represent equity securities that are valued using
quoted market prices from nationally recognized markets. Level 2 securities represent debt
securities that are valued using a mathematical model based upon the specific characteristics of a
security in relationship to quoted prices for similar securities.
Interest rate swaps: The interest rate swaps are valued using a discounted cash flow model
that uses verifiable market environment inputs to calculate the fair value. This method is not
dependant on the input of any significant judgments or assumptions by Management.
For financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, the fair value
measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at March 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Asset Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
10,688 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,688 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
11,440 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
Note 7 Financial Derivatives
The Board of Directors has given Management authorization to enter into additional derivative
activity including interest rate swaps, caps and floors, forward-rate agreements, options and
futures contracts in order to hedge interest rate risk. The Bank is exposed to credit risk equal
to the positive fair value of a derivative instrument, if any, as a positive fair value indicates
that the counterparty to the agreement is financially liable to the Bank. To limit this risk,
counterparties must have an investment grade long-term debt rating and individual counterparty
credit exposure is limited by Board approved parameters. Management anticipates continuing to use
derivatives, as permitted by its Board-approved policy, to manage interest rate risk. During 2008,
the Bank entered into two interest rate swap transactions in order to hedge the Corporations
exposure to changes in cash flows attributable to the effect of interest rate changes on variable
rate liabilities.
Information regarding the interest rate swap as of March 31, 2009 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Expected to |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
be Expensed into |
|
Notional |
|
Maturity |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Earnings within the |
|
Amount |
|
Date |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
Variable |
|
|
next 12 Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$10,000 |
|
|
5/30/2013 |
|
|
|
3.60 |
% |
|
|
0.23 |
% |
|
$ |
337 |
|
$10,000 |
|
|
5/30/2015 |
|
|
|
3.87 |
% |
|
|
0.23 |
% |
|
$ |
364 |
|
The variable rate is indexed to the 91-day Treasury Bill auction (discount) rate and resets weekly.
Derivatives with a positive fair value are reflected as other assets in the balance sheet
while those with a negative fair value are reflected as other liabilities. The swaps added $390
thousand to interest expense in 2008 compared to $41 thousand in 2007 and $38 thousand in 2006. As
short-term interest rates decrease, the net expense of the swap increases.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows as of
March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments Designated |
|
as Hedging Instruments Under Statement 133 |
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
3/31/2009 |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Sheet |
|
|
Fair |
|
Type |
|
Location |
|
Value |
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
2,197 |
|
14
The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Financial Performance for the Year Ended
March 31, 2009 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in Statement 133 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of |
|
|
Recognized in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
Income on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
Recognized in |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
Location of |
|
|
or (Loss) |
|
|
Income on |
|
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
|
|
or (Loss) |
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective |
|
|
and Amount |
|
|
|
Recognized in |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
Portion and Amount |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
|
|
OCI on Derivative |
|
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
into Income |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
|
Effectiveness |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
into Income |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
Effectiveness |
|
|
Testing |
|
Type |
|
3/31/2009 |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
3/31/2009 |
|
|
Testing |
|
|
3/31/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
186 |
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
$ |
(173 |
) |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
$ |
|
|
Note 8 Reclassifications
Certain prior period amounts may have been reclassified to conform to the current year
presentation. Such reclassifications did not affect reported net income.
15
Part I, Item 2
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition
For the Three Month Periods Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
Forward Looking Statements
Certain statements appearing herein which are not historical in nature are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such
forward-looking statements refer to a future period or periods, reflecting managements current
views as to likely future developments, and use words such as may, will, expect, believe,
estimate, anticipate, or similar terms. Because forward-looking statements involve certain
risks, uncertainties and other factors over which the Corporation has no direct control, actual
results could differ materially from those contemplated in such statements. These factors include
(but are not limited to) the following: general economic conditions, changes in interest rates,
changes in the Corporations cost of funds, changes in government monetary policy, changes in
government regulation and taxation of financial institutions, changes in the rate of inflation,
changes in technology, the intensification of competition within the Corporations market area, and
other similar factors.
Critical Accounting Policies
Management has identified critical accounting policies for the Corporation to include
Allowance for Loan Losses, Mortgage Servicing Rights, Financial Derivatives, Temporary Investment
Impairment and Stock-based Compensation. There were no changes to the critical accounting policies
disclosed in the 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K in regards to application or related judgements
and estimates used. Please refer to Item 7 of the Corporations 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K
for a more detailed disclosure of the critical accounting policies.
Results of Operations
Summary
The Corporation reported net income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 of $2.1 million.
This is a 17% decrease versus net income of $2.5 million for the same period in 2008. Total
revenue (interest income and noninterest income) decreased $586 thousand year-over-year, due
primarily to the lower interest rate environment and its negative effect on interest income. The
provision for loan losses was $593 thousand for the period, $378 thousand more than in 2008.
Diluted earnings per share decreased from $.66 in 2008 to $.55 in 2009. Total assets were $915.3
million at March 31, 2009, an increase of $12.8 million from year-end 2008. Net loans grew during
the quarter with an ending balance of $688.9 million, while total deposits grew to $654.4 million.
Other key performance ratios as of, or for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (on an
annualized basis) are listed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Return on average equity (ROE) |
|
|
11.42 |
% |
|
|
12.74 |
% |
Return on average assets (ROA) |
|
|
.94 |
% |
|
|
1.22 |
% |
Return on average tangible average equity(1) |
|
|
14.10 |
% |
|
|
15.50 |
% |
Return on average tangible average assets(1) |
|
|
.98 |
% |
|
|
1.29 |
% |
16
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Corporation supplements its traditional GAAP measurements with Non-GAAP measurements.
The Non-GAAP measurements include Return on Average Tangible Assets and Return on Average Tangible
Equity. The purchase method of accounting was used to record the acquisition of Fulton Bancshares
Corporation. As a result, intangible assets (primarily goodwill and core deposit intangibles) were
created. The Non-GAAP disclosures are intended to eliminate the effects of the intangible assets
and allow for better comparisons to periods when such assets did not exist. The following table
shows the adjustments made between the GAAP and NON-GAAP measurements: |
|
|
|
GAAP Measurement |
|
Calculation |
Return on Average Assets
|
|
Net Income / Average Assets |
Return on Average Equity
|
|
Net Income / Average Equity |
|
|
|
Non- GAAP Measurement |
|
Calculation |
Return on Average Tangible Assets
|
|
Net Income plus Intangible Amortization / Average
Assets less Average Intangible Assets |
Return on Average Tangible Equity
|
|
Net Income plus Intangible Amortization / Average
Equity less Average Intangible Assets |
A more detailed discussion of the operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2009
follows:
Comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2009 to the three months ended March 31, 2008:
Net Interest Income
The most important source of the Corporations earnings is net interest income, which is
defined as the difference between income on interest-earning assets and the expense of
interest-bearing liabilities supporting those assets. Principal categories of interest-earning
assets are loans and securities, while deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase
(Repos), short-term borrowings and long-term debt are the principal categories of interest-bearing
liabilities. Demand deposits enhance net interest income because they are noninterest-bearing
deposits. All balance sheet amounts in the discussion of net interest income refer to either
year-to-date or quarterly average balances.
Interest income for the first quarter of 2009 decreased to $10.8 million from $11.7 million
during the first quarter of 2009. Average interest-earning assets increased by $83.6 million from
the first quarter of 2008, however the yield on these assets decreased by 104 basis points. The
average balance on investment securities decreased $14.4 million quarter over quarter due to pay
downs and maturities in the portfolio. Total average loans increased $101.2 million (17.5%)
quarter over quarter. Average commercial loans increased $111.7 million during the first quarter
of 2009, but the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $12.4 million in average
outstanding mortgage loans, as the mortgage portfolio continues to runoff. Average consumer loans
increased only slightly, $1.8 million, as consumers reacted to the adverse changes in the economy.
Interest expense was $3.6 million for the quarter, a decrease of $575 thousand from the first
quarter of 2008 total of $4.2 million. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased to $734.2
million in the first quarter of 2009 compared to an average balance of $648.0 million during the
same period in 2008, an increase of $86.1 million. The average cost of these liabilities decreased
from 2.58% to 1.98%. Average interest-bearing deposits increased $42.2 million and the cost
decreased from 2.26% to 1.83%. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (Repos) have
decreased $5.1 million on average over the prior year quarter and the average rate has decreased
from 3.15% to .25%. The average balance of long-term debt increased over $44 million due to the
Bank taking additional advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLB) and was the
primary reason for the increase in interest expense for this liability.
17
The changes in the balance sheet and interest rates resulted in a decrease in net interest
income of $295 thousand to $7.2 million for the first quarter of 2009 compared to $7.5 million for
the first quarter of 2008. The Banks net interest margin decreased from 4.17% for the first
quarter of 2008 to 3.60% in the first quarter of 2009. The decrease in the net interest margin is
due to the yield on interest-bearing assets decreasing 104 basis points, while the yield on
interest-earning liabilities only decreased 60 basis point.
The following table shows a comparative analysis of average balances, asset yields and funding
costs for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. These components drive changes in net
interest income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Equivalent |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Equivalent |
|
|
Average |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
yield/rate |
|
|
balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
yield/rate |
|
Interest-earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and interest bearing balances |
|
$ |
626 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,727 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
% |
Investment securities |
|
|
151,855 |
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
4.83 |
% |
|
|
166,276 |
|
|
|
2,251 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
% |
Loans |
|
|
678,951 |
|
|
|
9,191 |
|
|
|
5.49 |
% |
|
|
577,780 |
|
|
|
9,666 |
|
|
|
6.71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
831,432 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
5.37 |
% |
|
$ |
747,783 |
|
|
|
11,953 |
|
|
|
6.41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
549,381 |
|
|
|
2,482 |
|
|
|
1.83 |
% |
|
$ |
507,217 |
|
|
|
2,856 |
|
|
|
2.26 |
% |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
72,297 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
% |
|
|
77,395 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
3.15 |
% |
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
6,684 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
% |
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
2.92 |
% |
Long-term debt |
|
|
105,790 |
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
|
4.04 |
% |
|
|
61,650 |
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
4.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
734,152 |
|
|
|
3,593 |
|
|
|
1.98 |
% |
|
$ |
648,047 |
|
|
|
4,168 |
|
|
|
2.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.83 |
% |
Net interest income/Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,407 |
|
|
|
3.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,785 |
|
|
|
4.17 |
% |
Tax equivalent adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Loan Losses
The Corporation recorded $593 thousand in provision expense during the first three months of
2009 versus $215 thousand for the same period in 2008. For more information concerning loan
quality and the allowance for loan losses, refer to the Asset Quality discussion.
18
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income was $2.3 million in the first quarter of 2009, $284 thousand more than the
first quarter of 2008 total of $2.0 million. Investment and trust service fees decreased $21
thousand due primarily to a decrease in estate settlement fees. Loan fees increased by $100
thousand due to a high volume of mortgage refinancing spurred by the low rate environment.
Mortgage banking fees increased $81 thousand due to a mortgage servicing rights (MSR) impairment
charge of $172 thousand taken in the first quarter of 2008 versus no impairment charges in 2009.
Deposit fees decreased $12 thousand due to
lower usage of the Banks
overdraft protection product; however, this decrease was partially
offset by an increase in commercial account analysis fees. During 2008, the Corporation had an
investment in American Home Bank, N.A (AHB) that was accounted for using the equity method of
accounting. This investment produced a loss of $166 thousand in the first quarter of 2008. On
December 31, 2008, First Chester County Corporation (FCEC) completed its acquisition of AHB. The
Corporation discontinued the equity method of accounting on this investment and no income was
recognized in 2009. At December 31, 2008 the Corporation recorded its investment in FCEC common
stock in its investment portfolio. Other income increased $273 thousand due to income from the
surrender of a life insurance policy in the first quarter of 2009. Net securities losses and
impairment charges of $197 thousand were recognized in the first quarter of 2009 compared to gains
of $107 thousand recognized in 2008. The Corporation took an impairment charge of $209 thousand on
three banks stocks in its equity portfolio in the first quarter of 2009 compared to an impairment
charge of $222 thousand in the first quarter of 2008 on four bank stocks. The price of bank stocks
continues to be very volatile and Management is closely monitoring the value of its equity
portfolio. It is possible that additional write-downs may be required during 2009.
The following table provides more information about noninterest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Noninterest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment and trust services fees |
|
$ |
894 |
|
|
$ |
915 |
|
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
Loan service charges and fees |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
56.5 |
|
Mortgage banking activities |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
(74.3 |
) |
Deposit service charges and fees |
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
Other service charges and fees |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Equity method investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Other |
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
1,240.9 |
|
Impairment writedown on equity securities |
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
Gains (losses) on sale of securities, net |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
(96.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
$ |
2,287 |
|
|
$ |
2,003 |
|
|
$ |
284 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest Expense
During the first quarter of 2009, noninterest expense increased $301 thousand to $6.2 million
from $5.8 million in 2008. Salaries and benefits increased $52 thousand, with $104 thousand of the
increase due to increased staff and pay increases in 2008 that have affected 2009. The expense of
an incentive compensation program decreased $130 thousand, while pension expense increased $144
thousand, due to the low rate environment and its affect on the pension plan performance. During
the first quarter of 2009, the Corporation awarded 14,900 stock options under its Incentive Stock
Option Plan with a fair value of approximately $29 thousand. These options have a 6-month vesting
period and will be fully expensed in 2009. For the first quarter of 2009, the Corporation recorded
stock option compensation of $5 thousand, down from $28 thousand in 2008. Advertising expense
remained flat, while net occupancy expense was up $22 thousand due to additional depreciation from
renovations to an existing office completed in late 2008. Data processing expenses were up $44
thousand due to the implementation of remote deposit capture and electronic check presentment
services. Intangible amortization increased $27 thousand from amortization of the customer list
booked with the acquisition of Community Financial Inc. in the fourth quarter of 2008. Other
noninterest expense decreased $37 thousand during the quarter due to decreases in expenses for
postage and loan collection expense.
19
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) Premiums
FDIC insurance expense increased $213 thousand during the first three months of 2009 to $231
thousand compared to $18 thousand for the same period in 2008. The FDIC insurance expense in the
first quarter of 2008 was partially offset by the use of FDIC premium credits. These credits were
completely used in 2008.
The Bank is a member of the Deposit Insurance Fund (the DIF), which is administered by the
FDIC. Deposit accounts at the Bank are insured by the FDIC, generally up to a maximum of $100,000
for each separately insured depositor and up to a maximum of $250,000 for self-directed retirement
accounts. However, the FDIC increased the deposit insurance available on all deposit accounts to
$250,000, effective until December 31, 2009. In addition, certain noninterest-bearing transaction
accounts maintained with financial institutions participating in the FDICs Transaction Account
Guarantee Program (TAG) are fully insured regardless of the dollar amount until December 31, 2009.
Under the TAG, an annualized 10 basis point assessment on balances in noninterest-bearing
transaction accounts that exceed the existing deposit insurance limit of $250,000 will be assessed
on a quarterly basis to insured depository institutions that have not opted out of this component
of the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. The Bank has opted to participate in the Transaction
Account Guaranteed Program.
The FDIC imposes an assessment against all depository institutions for deposit insurance. This
assessment is based on the risk category of the institution and, prior to 2009, ranged from 5 to 43
basis points of the institutions deposits. On February 27, 2009, the FDIC published a final rule
raising the current deposit insurance assessment rates uniformly for all institutions by seven
basis points (to a range from 12 to 45 basis points) for the second quarter of 2009. This action
also changed the way that the FDICs assessment system differentiates for risk, extended the time
frame to restore the DIF from 5 years to 7 years and imposes a special assessment on insured
institutions of up to 20 basis points. As of March 31, 2009 the final charge for the special
assessment had not been determined. The special assessment is payable September 30, 2009 based on
deposits as of June 30, 2009. If the special assessment is 20 basis points, the Bank expects to
recognize an additional expense of approximately $1.3 million during the second quarter of 2009.
The ruling also allows the FDIC to impose an emergency assessment of 10 basis points, each quarter,
after June 30, 2009 if necessary to maintain public confidence in federal deposit insurance.
20
The following table provides more information about noninterest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Noninterest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
$ |
3,153 |
|
|
$ |
3,101 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Net occupancy expense |
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Furniture and equipment expense |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Advertising |
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Legal & professional fees |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
Pennsylvania bank shares tax |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
Intangible amortization |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
FDIC insurance |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
1,183.3 |
|
Other |
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
$ |
6,150 |
|
|
$ |
5,849 |
|
|
$ |
301 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
Federal income tax expense was $662 thousand in 2009 and $921 thousand for 2008. This expense
resulted in an effective tax rate for 2009 of 24.0% and 26.7% for 2008. The ratio of tax-exempt
income to pre-tax income in 2009 was greater than in 2008; therefore, the effective tax rate was
lower in 2009. All taxable income for the Corporation is taxed at a rate of 34%.
Financial Condition
At March 31, 2009, assets totaled $915.3 million, an increase of $12.8 million from the 2008
year-end balance of $902.5 million. The investment portfolio has decreased by $7.3 million, due to
maturities and pay downs, and the funds have been reinvested in the loan portfolio. The Bank held
$6.5 million of restricted stock at March 31, 2009. Except for $30 thousand, this investment
represents stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, which the Bank is required to hold to
be a member of FHLB, and is carried at cost of $100 per share. In December 2008, FHLB announced it
would suspend the repurchase of excess capital stock from its members due to deterioration in its
financial condition. At March 31, 2009, the Bank held approximately $1.1 million in excess FHLB
stock that it would not have been required to hold prior to the suspension of the stock repurchase
program.
Net loans have increased $20.1 million since year-end. Commercial lending activity continues
to be good and these balances have increased more than $28.1 million. However, the growth in
commercial loans was partially offset by a decrease of approximately $3.5 million in the
residential mortgage loan portfolio and $4.1 million in the consumer portfolio. The mortgage
portfolio is expected to continue to run-off as the Corporation is originating mortgages, but is
not funding, servicing or retaining the loans. The decrease in the consumer loan portfolio is
primarily from pay downs on home equity loans, much of which was a result of refinancing a first
mortgage.
21
The following table presents a summary of loans outstanding at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
3/31/2009 |
|
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Residential mortgage loans |
|
$ |
74,596 |
|
|
$ |
78,061 |
|
|
$ |
(3,465 |
) |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
Residential construction loans |
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
Commercial construction and land
development |
|
|
101,798 |
|
|
|
99,027 |
|
|
|
2,771 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Commercial, industrial and agricultural |
|
|
391,618 |
|
|
|
366,261 |
|
|
|
25,357 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
Consumer home equity loans and lines
of credit |
|
|
100,722 |
|
|
|
103,523 |
|
|
|
(2,801 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
Consumer other |
|
|
27,620 |
|
|
|
28,937 |
|
|
|
(1,317 |
) |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
696,773 |
|
|
|
676,217 |
|
|
|
20,556 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(7,843 |
) |
|
|
(7,357 |
) |
|
|
(486 |
) |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loans |
|
$ |
688,930 |
|
|
$ |
668,860 |
|
|
$ |
20,070 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the loan balances are the
following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unamortized deferred loan costs |
|
$ |
637 |
|
|
$ |
646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized (discount) premium on
purchased loans |
|
$ |
(281 |
) |
|
$ |
(295 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets are comprised of a core deposit intangible and a customer list and are
being amortized over the estimated useful life of the asset.
Total deposits increased $27.1 million during the first quarter of 2009 to $654.4 million from
year-end 2008. Non-interest bearing deposits decreased $8.6 million, but were offset by increases
in interest-bearing deposits. Savings and interest-bearing checking deposits increased $12.1
million and time deposits increased $23.6 million, as the Bank took out brokered deposits in the
amount of $23.5 million. During the first quarter of 2009, the Bank became a member of the
Promontory Network and began offering CDs through CDARS. CDARS places large deposits into CDs with
other network member banks in increments less than the FDIC insurance maximum, thereby providing
insurance coverage on the entire balance. As of March 31, 2009, the Bank had $880 thousand in
CDARS deposits and this has grown to $7.5 million during April 2009. The Corporations Money
Management product decreased, $3.3 million due to a decrease in municipal funds.
The following table presents a summary of deposits outstanding at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
3/31/2009 |
|
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Demand, noninterest-bearing |
|
$ |
78,322 |
|
|
$ |
86,954 |
|
|
$ |
(8,632 |
) |
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing checking |
|
|
98,455 |
|
|
|
86,241 |
|
|
|
12,214 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
Savings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
200,313 |
|
|
|
203,171 |
|
|
|
(2,858 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
Passbook and statement savings |
|
|
48,763 |
|
|
|
46,006 |
|
|
|
2,757 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total savings and interest checking |
|
|
347,531 |
|
|
|
335,418 |
|
|
|
12,113 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits of $100,000 and over |
|
|
61,810 |
|
|
|
50,510 |
|
|
|
11,300 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
Brokered time deposits (includes CDARS) |
|
|
24,386 |
|
|
|
16,504 |
|
|
|
7,882 |
|
|
|
47.8 |
|
Other time deposits |
|
|
142,356 |
|
|
|
137,955 |
|
|
|
4,401 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
228,552 |
|
|
|
204,969 |
|
|
|
23,583 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
654,405 |
|
|
$ |
627,341 |
|
|
$ |
27,064 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overdrawn deposit accounts reclassified as
loan balances |
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
The Repo balance has increased to $68.7 million from year-end, due mainly to the seasonality
of real estate tax deposits. Long-term debt from the FHLB decreased $923 thousand due to pay downs.
Total shareholders equity increased $189 thousand to $73.2 million at March 31, 2009,
compared to $73.1 million at the end of 2008. The increase in retained earnings from the
Corporations net income of $2.1 million was partially offset by the cash dividend of $1.0 million.
The decrease of $1.0 million in accumulated other comprehensive income is the result of a decline
in the market value of investment securities available for sale. The Corporation repurchased 3,000
shares of the Corporations common stock for $51 thousand during the first quarter.
Capital adequacy is currently defined by regulatory agencies through the use of several
minimum required ratios. At March 31, 2009, the Corporation was well capitalized as defined by the
banking regulatory agencies. Regulatory capital ratios for the Corporation and the Bank are shown
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well Capitalized |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
Minimum |
|
Total Risk Based Capital Ratio (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franklin Financial Services Corporation |
|
|
10.87 |
% |
|
|
11.02 |
% |
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
Farmers & Merchants Trust Company |
|
|
10.45 |
% |
|
|
10.29 |
% |
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franklin Financial Services Corporation |
|
|
9.76 |
% |
|
|
9.96 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
Farmers & Merchants Trust Company |
|
|
9.34 |
% |
|
|
9.21 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage Ratio (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franklin Financial Services Corporation |
|
|
7.81 |
% |
|
|
7.84 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
Farmers & Merchants Trust Company |
|
|
7.46 |
% |
|
|
7.26 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total risk-based capital / total risk-weighted assets, (2)Tier 1 capital / total risk-weighted assets, (3) Tier 1 capital / average quarterly assets |
Asset Quality
Loans
Nonperforming loans increased significantly due to increases in both nonaccrual loans and loan
past due 90 days or more and still accruing. The increase in nonaccrual loans was due to the
addition of one credit significant agricultural credit after workout options failed. Management has
specifically allocated for all identified loss.
Loans past due 90 days or more increased primarily due to the maturity of two acquisition,
construction and development (ACD) credits and secondarily due to the two related commercial and
industrial (C&I) credits. Management expects to mitigate any risk of loss associated with one of
the ACD
and both of the C&I credits, and it continues to work with the lead bank to identify risk of
loss associated with the other ACD credit.
The increase in nonperforming loans was the cause of the decrease in the coverage ratio of the
allowance for loan losses (ALL) to nonperforming loans, from 183.93% to 59.74%. The Corporation
did not have any foreclosed real estate at March 31, 2009 or December 31, 2008.
23
The following table presents a summary of nonperforming assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
3/31/2009 |
|
|
12/31/2008 |
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
Construction and land development |
|
|
1,297 |
|
|
|
1,286 |
|
Commercial and farm real estate |
|
|
1,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
1,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
4,600 |
|
|
$ |
2,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans past due 90 days or more and not included above |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
Construction and land development |
|
|
6,418 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
Commercial and farm real estate |
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing |
|
$ |
8,529 |
|
|
$ |
1,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans |
|
|
13,129 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
Foreclosed real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
13,129 |
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans to total gross loans |
|
|
1.88 |
% |
|
|
0.59 |
% |
Nonperforming assets to total assets |
|
|
1.43 |
% |
|
|
0.44 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans |
|
|
59.74 |
% |
|
|
183.93 |
% |
Net charge-offs decreased slightly during the first quarter of 2009 ($107 thousand) compared
to the first quarter of 2008 ($183 thousand). Consumer installment loans accounted for the largest
gross charge-off category during the quarter. The annualized net charge-off ratio at March 31, 2009
of .06% is less than the .13% annualized net charge-offs at March 31, 2008 and the .77% actual net
charge-off ratio at December 31, 2008.
The provision for loan loss expense was $593 thousand for the first quarter of 2009, compared
to $215 thousand for the first quarter of 2008. The increase in the provision during the quarter
reflected the increased risk of loss in the loan portfolio. The ALL as a percentage of loans
increased slightly from 1.09% at year-end 2008 to 1.13% at March 31, 2009.
24
The following table presents an analysis of the allowance for loan losses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
7,357 |
|
|
$ |
7,361 |
|
|
$ |
7,361 |
|
Addition of allowance from acquistion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, industrial and agricultural |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(713 |
) |
Consumer |
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(496 |
) |
Real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(224 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs |
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
(1,433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, industrial and agricultural |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (charge-offs) recoveries |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
(1,197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
7,843 |
|
|
$ |
7,393 |
|
|
$ |
7,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized net loans charged-off (recovered) as a
percentage of average loans |
|
|
0.06 |
% |
|
|
0.13 |
% |
|
|
0.19 |
% |
Annualized net loans charged-off (recovered) as a
percentage of the provision for loan losses |
|
|
18.04 |
% |
|
|
85.12 |
% |
|
|
100.34 |
% |
Allowance as a percentage of loans |
|
|
1.13 |
% |
|
|
1.26 |
% |
|
|
1.09 |
% |
Management monitors the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on an ongoing basis and
reports its adequacy assessment monthly to the Board of Directors. Management believes that the
allowance for loan losses is adequate.
Investments
At March 31, 2009, the Corporation held 104 debt securities where the current fair value was
less than the related amortized cost. The unrealized loss on these securities was $6.8 million.
This compares to an unrealized loss of $6.0 million on 110 debt securities at December 31, 2008.
The majority of the loss is comprised of 6 single-issuer trust-preferred securities (-$3.1
million), 5 corporate bonds (-$1.1 million) and 6 private label Alt-A mortgage-backed bonds
(-$1.2 million). Management believes that these investments do not offer any undue risk of loss.
The Corporations equity security portfolio is comprised entirely of stocks in the banking
industry. There are 29 stocks with an unrealized loss of $2.2 million versus 25 stocks with an
unrealized loss of $938 thousand at December 31, 2008. The increase in the unrealized loss at
March 31, 2009 is due in large part to 2 equity securities. The large number of shares held in the
first equity security has compounded the loss in this security. This large position was recorded at
December 31, 2008 as a result of the acquisition of an equity method investment previously held by
the Corporation. The second equity security represents a large national bank.
25
The Bank held $6.5 million of restricted stock at March 31, 2009. Except for $30 thousand,
this investment represents stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, which the Bank is
required to hold to be a member of FHLB, and is carried at cost of $100 per share. Due to concerns
about the capital strength of the FHLB system, there has been industry discussion about impairment
issues on FHLB stock. If FHLB stock were deemed to be impaired, the write-down for the Bank could
be significant. However, due to the nature of the FHLB system and the heavy dependence of
community banks on the FHLB, it is believed that any determination about the valuation of FHLB
stock needs to be accomplished at the national level so that the entire community banking system is
not disrupted.
As the value of financial stocks continued to fall during 2009, the Corporation took
impairment charges of $209 thousand on three bank stocks. Management is closely monitoring the
value of its equity portfolio. It is possible that additional write-downs may be required during
the remainder of 2009.
Economy
The Corporation operates in Franklin, Cumberland, Fulton and Huntingdon Counties,
Pennsylvania. The general economic conditions in this market have deteriorated slightly since
year-end and unemployment rates are vastly different from county to county. Franklin Countys
unemployment rate was 8.1%, Cumberland Countys rate was 6.4% and Fulton Countys rate was 15.1% at
March 31, 2009. Two large global manufacturers have recently laid-off workers due to a slow down
in production and this has contributed to the increase in unemployment rates. These rates compare
to the Pennsylvania state average of 7.5%. Management believes that the Banks primary market area
continues to be well suited for growth when the national recession eases. The Corporation is not
overly dependent on any one industry within its market area and the industries located in its
market area are well diversified. Housing prices have declined and housing sales have slowed;
however, the Corporations market area has not been affected by increased home foreclosures as much
as other areas of the country have.
Unlike many companies, the assets and liabilities of the Corporation are financial in nature.
As such, interest rates and changes in interest rates may have a more significant effect on the
Corporations financial results than on other types of industries. Because of this, the Corporation
watches the actions of the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee (FOMC) as it makes decisions about
interest rate changes. The Fed continued to decrease rates through 2008. The fed funds target rate
was decreased by 4% in 2008 from 4.25% to .25% at year-end and has remained unchanged in 2009. The
effort by the Federal Reserve to reduce short-term rates has had a negative effect on the
Corporations net interest margin. If rates continue to remain low, it is unlikely that the net
interest margin will improve in 2009.
Liquidity
The Corporation must meet the financial needs of the customers that it serves, while providing
a satisfactory return on the shareholders investment. In order to accomplish this, the
Corporation must maintain sufficient liquidity in order to respond quickly to the changing level of
funds required for both loan and deposit activity. The goal of liquidity management is to meet the
ongoing cash flow requirements of depositors who want to withdraw funds and of borrowers who
request loan disbursements. The Bank regularly reviews it liquidity position by measuring its
projected net cash flows (in and out) at a 30 and 90-day interval. The Bank stresses this
measurement by assuming a level of deposit out-flows that have not historically been realized. In
addition to this forecast, other funding sources are reviewed as a method to provide emergency
funding if necessary. The objective of this measurement is to identify the amount of cash that
could be raised quickly without the need to liquidate assets. The Bank believes it can meet all
anticipated liquidity demands.
26
Historically, the Corporation has satisfied its liquidity needs from earnings, repayment of
loans and amortizing investment securities, maturing investment securities, loan` sales, deposit
growth and its ability to access existing lines of credit. All investments are classified as
available for sale; therefore, securities that are not pledged as collateral for borrowings are an
additional source of readily available liquidity, either by selling the security or, more
preferably, to provide collateral for additional borrowing. At March 31, 2009, the Bank had
approximately $135 million of its investment portfolio pledged as collateral. Another source of
liquidity for the Bank is a line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLB).
The FHLB system has always been a major source of funding for community banks. The capital level of
the Pittsburgh FHLB, and the entire FHLB system, has been strained due to the declining value of
mortgage related assets. The Pittsburgh FHLB has implemented steps to improve its capital position
that included a suspension of its dividend and an end to its practice of redeeming members stock.
Both of these actions are not favorable to the Bank. There are no indicators that lead the Bank to
believe the FHLB will discontinue its lending function. If that were to occur, it would have a
negative effect on the Bank and it is unlikely that the Bank could replace the level of FHLB
funding in a short time. Another action that may be considered by FHLB to increase its capital is
to have a capital call on its member banks. This would require the member banks to invest more
capital into the FHLB when most banks would prefer not make such an investment. At March 31, 2009,
the Bank had approximately $120 million available on this line of credit.
In addition, the Bank had a $10 million line of credit at a correspondent bank and
approximately $41 million in funding available at the Federal Reserve Discount Window. The Bank
also has the ability to access other funding sources including wholesale borrowings and brokered
CDs.
Off Balance Sheet Commitments and Contractual Obligations
The Corporations financial statements do not reflect various commitments that are made in the
normal course of business, which may involve some liquidity risk. These commitments consist mainly
of unfunded loans and letters of credit made under the same standards as on-balance sheet
instruments. Because these instruments have fixed maturity dates, and because many of them will
expire without being drawn upon, they do not generally present any significant liquidity risk to
the Corporation. Unused commitments and standby letters of credit totaled $191.1 million and
$183.1 million, respectively, at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
The Corporation has entered into various contractual obligations to make future payments.
These obligations include time deposits, long-term debt, operating leases, deferred compensation
and pension payments. These amounts have not changed materially from those reported in the
Corporations 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
27
PART I, Item 3
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
There were no material changes in the Corporations exposure to market risk during the three
months ended March 31, 2009. For more information on market risk refer to the Corporations 2008
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
PART I, Item 4
Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Controls and Procedures
The Corporation carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of
the Corporations management, including the Corporations Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Based upon the evaluation, the Corporations Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of March 31, 2009, the
Corporations disclosure controls and procedures are effective. Disclosure controls and procedures
are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
in the Corporations reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms.
The management of the Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting. The Corporations internal control system is designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Changes in Internal Controls
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Corporations internal control over financial
reporting as of March 31, 2009, using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control Integrated Framework. Based
on this assessment, management concluded that, as of March 31, 2009, the Corporations internal
control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
There were no changes during the three months ended March 31, 2009 in the Corporations
internal control over financial reporting which materially affected, or which are reasonably likely
to affect, the Corporations internal control over financial reporting.
28
Part II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The nature of the Banks business generates a certain amount of litigation involving matters
arising in the ordinary course of business. However, in managements opinion, there are no
proceedings pending to which the Corporation is a party or to which our property is subject, which,
if determined adversely to the Corporation, would be material in relation to our shareholders
equity or financial condition. In addition, no material proceedings are pending or are known to be
threatened or contemplated against us by governmental authorities or other parties.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There were no material changes in the Corporations risk factors during the three months ended
March 31, 2009. For more information, refer to the Corporations 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The Corporation announced a stock repurchase plan on July 10, 2008 to repurchase up to 100,000
shares of the Corporations common stock over a 12 month time period. The following chart reports
stock repurchases made during the first quarter of 2009 and the total shares repurchased under this
plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
that May Yet Be |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
|
Purchased Under |
|
Period |
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Announced Program |
|
|
Program |
|
January 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,668 |
|
February 2009 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
16.88 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
80,668 |
|
March 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
16.88 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Defaults by the Company on its Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications Chief Executive Officer |
|
31.2 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications Chief Financial Officer |
|
32.1 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications Chief Executive Officer |
|
32.2 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications Chief Financial Officer |
29
FRANKLIN FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION
and SUBSIDIARIES
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franklin Financial Services Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 11, 2009
|
|
/s/ William E. Snell, Jr.
William E. Snell, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 11, 2009
|
|
/s/ Mark R. Hollar
Mark R. Hollar
|
|
|
|
|
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
30
FRANKLIN FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION
and SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Rule 13a -14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications Chief Executive Officer |
|
31.2 |
|
|
Rule 13a -14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications Chief Financial Officer |
|
32.1 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications Chief Executive Officer |
|
32.2 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications Chief Financial Officer |
31