Edgar Filing: COMMUNITY TRUST BANCORP INC /KY/

ctbi10q0609.htm

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009

	Or

[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from _____________ to _____________

Commission file number 0-11129

COMMUNITY TRUST BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Kentucky	61-0979818
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	IRS Employer Identification No.

346 North Mayo Trail Pikeville, Kentucky (address of principal executive offices)	41501 (Zip Code)

(606) 432-1414

(Registrant’s telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ü

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.)

Yes

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer, large accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	Accelerated filer ü	Non-accelerated filer	Smaller reporting company
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes

No ü

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date.

Common stock – 15,144,256 shares outstanding at July 31, 2009

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The accompanying information has not been audited by independent registered public accountants; however, in the opinion of management such information reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim period. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with the requirements of Form 10-Q and consequently do not include all of the disclosures normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America or those normally made in the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K. Accordingly, the reader of the Form 10-Q should refer to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 for further information in this regard.

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(dollars in thousands)	(unaudited) June 30 2009			December 31 2008
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	84,289		$	89,576
Interest bearing deposits		7,372			5,422
Federal funds sold		34,118			45,880
Cash and cash equivalents		125,779			140,878

Other short-term investments		29,500			100
Securities available-for-sale at fair value
(amortized cost of $294,872 and $265,999, respectively)		298,006			267,376
Securities held-to-maturity at amortized cost
(fair value of $20,409 and $25,496, respectively)		19,875			25,597
Loans held for sale		600			623

Loans		2,380,255			2,348,651
Allowance for loan losses		(31,422	)		(30,821	)
Net loans		2,348,833			2,317,830

Premises and equipment, net		51,096			51,590
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock		29,048			29,040
Goodwill		65,059			65,059
Core deposit intangible (net of accumulated amortization of $6,539 and
$6,222, respectively)		965			1,282
Bank owned life insurance		25,524			24,135
Mortgage servicing rights		3,407			2,168
Other real estate owned		20,369			10,425
Other assets		17,906			18,428
Total assets	$	3,035,967		$	2,954,531

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
Deposits
Noninterest bearing	$	463,164		$	450,360
Interest bearing		1,930,789			1,881,474
Total deposits		2,393,953			2,331,834

Repurchase agreements		152,290			157,422
Federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings		19,712			11,492
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		60,696			60,727
Long-term debt		61,341			61,341
Other liabilities		33,201			23,509
Total liabilities		2,721,193			2,646,325

Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, 300,000 shares authorized and unissued		-			-
Common stock, $5 par value, shares authorized 25,000,000;
shares outstanding 2009 –15,134,245 ; 2008 – 15,066,248		75,671			75,331
Capital surplus		151,668			150,037
Retained earnings		85,398			81,943
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax		2,037			895
Total shareholders’ equity		314,774			308,206

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	3,035,967		$	2,954,531

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Other Comprehensive Income

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30						June 30
(in thousands except per share data)	2009			2008			2009		2008

Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans, including loans held for sale	$	34,435		$	37,308		$	68,622	$	77,063
Interest and dividends on securities
Taxable		2,499			3,226			5,098		6,638
Tax exempt		498			471			928		945
Interest and dividends on Federal Reserve and Federal		339			285			684		794
Home Loan Bank stock
Other, including interest on federal funds sold		154			380			269		910
Total interest income		37,925			41,670			75,601		86,350

Interest expense:
Interest on deposits		10,436			13,522			21,489		29,049
Interest on repurchase agreements and other short-term
Borrowings		598			1,090			1,271		2,558
Interest on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		482			376			958		753
Interest on long-term debt		1,000			1,000			2,000		2,000
Total interest expense		12,516			15,988			25,718		34,360

Net interest income		25,409			25,682			49,883		51,990
Provision for loan losses		4,522			2,648			6,503		5,017
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		20,887			23,034			43,380		46,973

Noninterest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		5,517			5,503			10,466		10,602
Gains on sales of loans, net		1,309			494			3,240		1,040
Trust income		1,249			1,298			2,411		2,489
Loan related fees		1,494			1,079			2,242		1,378
Bank owned life insurance		287			269			543		532
Securities gains (losses)		(4	)		0			515		(50	)
Other		1,103			1,038			2,291		2,433
Total noninterest income		10,955			9,681			21,708		18,424

Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits		10,650			10,600			21,918		21,311
Occupancy, net		1,714			1,708			3,518		3,334
Equipment		1,269			1,114			2,388		2,167
Data processing		1,514			1,426			3,001		2,807
Bank franchise tax		918			914			1,828		1,804
Legal and professional fees		924			724			1,994		1,437
FDIC Insurance		2,250			65			3,746		132
Other		4,339			3,892			8,982		7,452
Total noninterest expense		23,578			20,443			47,375		40,444

Income before income taxes		8,264			12,272			17,713		24,953
Income taxes		2,327			3,652			5,196		7,788
Net income		5,937			8,620			12,517		17,165

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized holding gains (losses ) on securities available-for-sale		56			(3,618	)		1,142		(587	)
Comprehensive income	$	5,993		$	5,002		$	13,659	$	16,578

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Other Comprehensive Income

(continued)

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30				June 30
(in thousands except per share data)	2009		2008		2009		2008

Basic earnings per share	$	0.39	$	0.58	$	0.83	$	1.14
Diluted earnings per share		0.39		0.57		0.82		1.13

Weighted average shares outstanding-basic		15,127		14,989		15,101		14,995
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted		15,219		15,152		15,194		15,145

Dividends declared per share	$	0.30	$	0.29	$	0.60	$	0.58

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

	Six months ended
	June 30
(in thousands)	2009			2008

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	12,517		$	17,165
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		2,712			2,567
Deferred taxes		581			(222	)
Stock based compensation		283			368
Excess tax benefits of stock-based compensation		596			421
Provision for loan and other real estate losses		7,030			5,142
Securities (gains)/losses		(515	)		50
Gains on sale of mortgage loans held for sale		(3,240	)		(1,040	)
Gains on sale of assets, net		(11	)		(70	)
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale		162,972			52,933
Funding of mortgage loans held for sale		(159,708	)		(51,053	)
Amortization of securities premiums, net		929			(96	)
Change in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance		(444	)		(451	)
Fair value adjustments of mortgage servicing rights		(237	)		2
Changes in:
Other liabilities		8,786			1,826
Other assets		(535	)		4,137
Net cash provided by operating activities		31,715			31,679

Cash flows from investing activities:
Securities available-for-sale:
Proceeds from sales		37,451			29,950
Proceeds from prepayments and maturities		51,744			41,076
Purchase of securities		(118,454	)		(54,648	)
Securities held-to-maturity:
Proceeds from prepayments and maturities		6,179			3,684
Purchase of securities		(480	)		(53,073	)
Other short term investments
Purchase of securities		(29,400	)		0
Change in loans, net		(49,582	)		(1,314	)
Purchase of premises, equipment, and other real estate		(1,900	)		(643	)
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment		24			0
Additional investment in equity securities		(8	)		0
Proceeds from sale of other real estate and other repossessed assets		2,155			2,422
Additional investment in other real estate owned		(508	)		(104	)
Additional investment in bank owned life insurance		(945	)		0
Net cash used in investing activities	$	(103,724	)	$	(32,650	)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)

(unaudited)

	Six months ended
	June 30
(in thousands)	2009			2008

Cash flows from financing activities:
Change in deposits, net	$	62,119		$	(15,041	)
Change in repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings, net		3,088			(17,011	)
Payments on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		(31	)		(97	)
Issuance of common stock		1,375			932
Purchase of common stock		0			(2,630	)
Excess tax benefits of stock-based compensation		(596	)		(421	)
Dividends paid		(9,045	)		(8,699	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		56,910			(42,967	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		(15,099	)		(43,938	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		140,878			137,250
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	125,779		$	93,212

Supplemental disclosures:
Income taxes paid	$	3,468		$	9,529
Interest paid		23,353			31,430
Non-cash activities
Loans to facilitate the sale of other real estate and other repossessed assets		281			885
Common stock dividends accrued, paid in subsequent quarter		4,540			8,686
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans		12,357			4,234

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (which consist of normal recurring accruals) necessary, to present fairly the condensed consolidated financial position as of June 30, 2009, the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information, these statements do not include certain information and footnote disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete annual financial statements. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (“CTBI”) for that period. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2008, included in CTBI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Principles of Consolidation – The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CTBI and its separate and distinct, wholly owned subsidiaries Community Trust Bank, Inc. (the “Bank”) and Community Trust and Investment Company. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Reclassifications – Certain reclassifications considered to be immaterial have been made in the prior year consolidated financial statements to conform to current year classifications. These reclassifications had no effect on net income.

These financial statements consider events that occurred through August 10, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued.

New Accounting Standards –

Ø Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities – This FASB Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1 addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share under the two-class method described in paragraphs 60 and 61 of FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings Per Share. This FSP was effective January 1, 2009, and did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Ø Business Combinations (Revised 2007) – The FASB recently issued SFAS 141(R), which replaces FAS 141, Business Combinations, and applies to all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains control over one or more other businesses. SFAS 141R requires an acquirer, upon initially obtaining control of another entity, to recognize the assets, liabilities, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at fair value as of the acquisition date. Contingent consideration is required to be recognized and measured at fair value on the date of acquisition rather than at a later date when the amount of that consideration may be determinable beyond a reasonable doubt. This fair value approach replaces the cost-allocation process required under SFAS 141 whereby the cost of an acquisition was allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair value. SFAS 141R requires acquirers to expense acquisition-related costs as incurred rather than allocating such costs to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as was previously the case under SFAS 141. Under SFAS 141R, the requirements of SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, would have to be met in order to accrue for a restructuring plan in purchase accounting. Pre-acquisition contingencies are to be recognized at fair value, unless it is a non-contractual contingency that is not likely to materialize, in which case, nothing should be recognized in purchase accounting, and instead, that contingency would be subject to the probable and estimable recognition criteria of SFAS 5, Accounting for Contingencies. This Statement defines a bargain purchase as a business combination in which the total acquisition date fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired exceeds the fair value of the consideration transferred plus any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, and it requires the acquirer to recognize that excess in earnings as a gain attributable to the acquirer. In contrast, Statement 141 required the “negative goodwill” amount to be allocated as a pro rata reduction of the amounts that otherwise would have been assigned to particular assets acquired. SFAS 141R is effective for business combinations occurring after January 1, 2009.

Ø Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly –FSP SFAS 157-4 affirms that the objective of fair value when the market for an asset is not active is the price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly transaction and clarifies and includes additional factors for determining whether there has been a significant decrease in market activity for an asset when the market for that asset is not active. FSP SFAS 157-4 requires an entity to base its conclusion about whether a transaction was not orderly on the weight of the evidence. FSP SFAS 157-4 also amended SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements, to expand certain disclosure requirements. This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. CTBI did not elect to early adopt. This FSP did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Ø Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments – FSP SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-2 (i) changes existing guidance for determining whether an impairment is other than temporary to debt securities and (ii) replaces the existing requirement that the entity’s management assert it has both the intent and ability to hold an impaired security until recovery with a requirement that management assert: (a) it does not have the intent to sell the security; and (b) it is more likely than not it will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis. Under FSP SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-2, declines in the fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses to the extent the impairment is related to credit losses. The amount of the impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. CTBI did not elect to early adopt. This FSP did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Ø Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments – FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 amends SFAS 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to require an entity to provide disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial information and amends Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. Under FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, a publicly traded company shall include disclosures about the fair value of its financial instruments whenever it issues summarized financial information for interim reporting periods. In addition, entities must disclose, in the body or in the accompanying notes of its summarized financial information for interim reporting periods and in its financial statements for annual reporting periods, the fair value of all financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value, whether recognized or not recognized in the statement of financial position, as required by SFAS 107. This FSP did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Ø Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies – FSP SFAS 141R-1 amends the guidance in SFAS 141R to require that assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies be recognized at fair value if fair value can be reasonably estimated. If fair value of such an asset or liability cannot be reasonably estimated, the asset or liability would generally be recognized in accordance with SFAS 5, Accounting for Contingencies, and FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 14, Reasonable Estimation of the Amount of a Loss. FSP SFAS 141R-1 removes subsequent accounting guidance for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies from SFAS 141R and requires entities to develop a systematic and rational basis for subsequently measuring and accounting for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies. FSP SFAS 141R-1 eliminates the requirement to disclose an estimate of the range of outcomes of recognized contingencies at the acquisition date. For unrecognized contingencies, entities are required to include only the disclosures required by SFAS 5. FSP SFAS 141R-1 also requires that contingent consideration arrangements of an acquiree assumed by the acquirer in a business combination be treated as contingent consideration of the acquirer and should be initially and subsequently measured at fair value in accordance with SFAS 141R. FSP SFAS 141R-1 is effective for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies CTBI acquires in business combinations occurring after January 1, 2009.

Ø Disclosure of Subsequent Events - SFAS No. 165 — In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 165 — Subsequent Events. SFAS No. 165 establishes the period after the balance sheet date during which management shall evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements and the circumstances under which an entity shall recognize events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date. SFAS No. 165 also requires disclosure of the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. The new standard becomes effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted this standard for the interim reporting period ending June 30, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Ø Accounting for transfers of Financial Assets - SFAS No. 166 — In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 166 — Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. SFAS No. 166 amends SFAS No. 140 and removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and limits the circumstances in which a financial asset, or portion of a financial asset, should be derecognized when the transferor has not transferred the entire financial asset to an entity that is not consolidated with the transferor in the financial statements being presented and/or when the transferor has continuing involvement with the transferred financial asset. The new standard will become effective for the Company on January 1, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS No. 166 on the consolidated financial statements.

Ø Determining when to consolidate variable purpose entities - SFAS No. 167 — In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 167 — Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). SFAS No. 167 amends tests under Interpretation No. 46(R) for variable interest entities to determine whether a variable interest entity must be consolidated. SFAS No. 167 requires an entity to perform an analysis to determine whether an entity’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This statement requires ongoing reassessments of whether an entity is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity and enhanced disclosures that provide more transparent information about an entity’s involvement with a variable interest entity. The new standard will become effective for the Company on January 1, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS No. 167 on the consolidated financial statements.

Ø Codification of authoritative accounting principles - SFAS No. 168 — In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 168 — The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. SFAS No. 168 replaces SFAS No. 162 and establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Rules and interpretative releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission under federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The new standard becomes effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Ø Disclosures regarding postretirement benefit plan assets - FSP FAS 132(R)-1 — In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 132(R)-1, Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets. This FASB staff position amends FASB Statement No. 132 to provide guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 requires disclosure of the fair value of each major category of plan assets for pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans. This FASB staff position becomes effective for the Company on January 1, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting FSP FAS 132(R)-1 on the consolidated financial statements, but it is not expected to have a material impact.

Note 2 – Stock-Based Compensation

CTBI’s compensation expense related to stock option grants was $238 thousand and $343 thousand, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Restricted stock expense for the first six months of 2009 and 2008 was $45 thousand and $25 thousand, respectively. As of June 30, 2009, there was a total of $0.7 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock option awards that will be recognized as expense as the awards vest over a weighted average period of 1.1 years.

There were options to purchase 9,000 shares of CTBI common stock and 5,710 shares of restricted stock granted during the six months ended June 30, 2009. The options were granted pursuant to the terms of the 2006 Stock Ownership Incentive Plan, with an exercise price per share of $29.82 (equal to fair market value on date of grant), a term of 10 years, and vesting in five years. The restrictions on the restricted stock will lapse at the end of five years. However, in the event of a change in control of CTBI or the death of the participant, the restrictions will lapse. In the event of the disability of the participant, the restrictions will lapse on a pro rata basis (with respect to 20% of the participant’s restricted stock for each year since the date of award). The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors will have discretion to review and revise restrictions applicable to a participant’s restricted stock in the event of the participant’s retirement. There were options to purchase 63,700 shares of CTBI common stock and 11,076 shares of restricted stock granted during the six months ended June 30, 2008.

The fair values of options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, were established at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the weighted average assumptions as follows:

	Six Months Ended
	June 30
	2009			2008
Expected dividend yield		4.02	%		4.10	%
Risk-free interest rate		2.23	%		3.23	%
Expected volatility		37.12	%		31.01	%
Expected term (in years)		7.5			7.5
Weighted average fair value of options	$	7.69		$	6.41

Note 3 – Securities

Securities are classified into held-to-maturity and available-for-sale categories. Held-to-maturity securities are those that CTBI has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity and are reported at amortized cost. Available-for-sale securities are those that CTBI may decide to sell if needed for liquidity, asset-liability management or other reasons. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains or losses included as a separate component of equity, net of tax.

The amortized cost and fair value of securities at June 30, 2009 are summarized as follows:

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	2,002	$	0	$	(23	)	$	1,979
State and political subdivisions		48,147		784		(503	)		48,428
U.S. government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through certificates		224,182		3,546		(68	)		227,660
Collateralized mortgage obligations		1		0		0			1
Total debt securities		274,332		4,330		(594	)		278,068
Marketable equity securities		20,540		0		(602	)		19,938
Total available-for-sale securities	$	294,872	$	4,330	$	(1,196	)	$	298,006

Held-to-Maturity

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
State and political subdivisions	$	1,576	$	9	$	0	$	1,585
U.S. government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through certificates		17,819		525		0		18,344
Other debt securities		480		0		0		480
Total held-to-maturity securities	$	19,875	$	534	$	0	$	20,409

The amortized cost and fair value of securities as of December 31, 2008 are summarized as follows:

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	18,330	$	576	$	0		$	18,906
State and political subdivisions		39,738		757		(651	)		39,844
U.S. government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through certificates		187,390		1,305		(390	)		188,305
Collateralized mortgage obligations		1		0		0			1
Total debt securities		245,459		2,638		(1,041	)		247,056
Marketable equity securities		20,540		0		(220	)		20,320
Total available-for-sale securities	$	265,999	$	2,638	$	(1,261	)	$	267,376

Held-to-Maturity

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
State and political subdivisions	$	1,576	$	9	$	0		$	1,585
U.S. government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through certificates		24,021		0		(110	)		23,911
Total held-to-maturity securities	$	25,597	$	9	$	(110	)	$	25,496

The amortized cost and fair value of securities at June 30, 2009 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	Available-for-Sale				Held-to-Maturity
(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	8,094	$	8,167	$	0	$	0
Due after one through five years		21,812		22,402		395		404
Due after five through ten years		5,194		5,101		0		0
Due after ten years		15,049		14,737		1,181		1,181
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations		224,183		227,661		17,819		18,344
Other securities		0		0		480		480
Total debt securities		274,332		278,068		19,875		20,409
Marketable equity securities		20,540		19,938		0		0
	$	294,872	$	298,006	$	19,875	$	20,409

Pre-tax gains on the sale of available for sale securities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 totaled $519 thousand and pre-tax losses for the same period were $4 thousand. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 there were no realized gains on sales of available for sale securities while pre-tax realized losses were $50 thousand.

Securities in the amount of $258 million and $276 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits, trust funds, repurchase agreements, and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank.

CTBI evaluates its investment portfolio on a quarterly basis for impairment. The analysis performed as of June 30, 2009 indicates that all impairment is considered temporary, market driven, and not credit-related. The following tables provide the amortized cost, gross unrealized losses, and fair market value, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2009.

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Less Than 12 Months
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	2,002	$	(23	)	$	1,979
State and political subdivisions		13,521		(260	)		13,261
U.S. government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through certificates		29,093		(68	)		29,025
Total debt securities		44,616		(351	)		44,265
Marketable equity securities		540		(234	)		306
Total securities	$	45,156	$	(585	)	$	44,571

12 Months or More
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	0	$	0		$	0
State and political subdivisions		4,023		(243	)		3,780
U.S. government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through certificates		0		0			0
Total debt securities		4,023		(243	)		3,780
Marketable equity securities		20,000		(368	)		19,632
Total securities	$	24,023	$	(611	)	$	23,412

Total
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	2,002	$	(23	)	$	1,979
State and political subdivisions		17,544		(503	)		17,041
U.S. government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through certificates		29,093		(68	)		29,025
Total debt securities		48,639		(594	)		48,045
Marketable equity securities		20,540		(602	)		19,938
Total securities	$	69,179	$	(1,196	)	$	67,983

As of June 30, 2009, there were no held-to-maturity securities with unrealized losses.

The analysis performed as of December 31, 2008 indicated that all impairment was considered temporary, due to fluctuations in interest rates, and not credit-related. The following tables provide the amortized cost, gross unrealized losses, and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2008.

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Less Than 12 Months
State and political subdivisions	$	8,929	$	(453	)	$	8,476
U.S. government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through certificates		76,984		(321	)		76,663
Total debt securities		85,913		(774	)		85,139
Marketable equity securities		20,000		(220	)		19,780
Total securities	$	105,913	$	(994	)	$	104,919

12 Months or More
State and political subdivisions	$	1,385	$	(198	)	$	1,187
U.S. government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through certificates		22,299		(69	)		22,230
Total debt securities		23,684		(267	)		23,417
Marketable equity securities		0		0			0
Total securities	$	23,684	$	(267	)	$	23,417

Total
State and political subdivisions	$	10,314	$	(651	)	$	9,663
U.S. government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through certificates		99,283		(390	)		98,893
Total debt securities		109,597		(1,041	)		108,556
Marketable equity securities		20,000		(220	)		19,780
Total securities	$	129,597	$	(1,261	)	$	128,336

Held-to-Maturity

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Less Than 12 Months
State and political subdivisions	$	0	$	0		$	0
U.S. government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through certificates		24,021		(110	)		23,911
Total securities	$	24,021	$	(110	)	$	23,911

Note 4 – Loans

Major classifications of loans, net of unearned income and deferred loan origination costs, are summarized as follows:

(in thousands)	June 30 2009		December 31 2008
Commercial construction	$	143,224	$	156,425
Commercial secured by real estate		702,892		663,663
Commercial other		365,415		365,685
Real estate construction		48,763		56,298
Real estate mortgage		589,639		609,394
Consumer		511,541		484,843
Equipment lease financing		18,781		12,343
Total loans	$	2,380,255	$	2,348,651

Activity in the allowance for loan and lease losses was as follows:

	Six Months Ended
	June 30
(in thousands)	2009			2008
Allowance balance at January 1	$	30,821		$	28,054
Additions to allowance charged against operations		6,503			5,017
Recoveries credited to allowance		1,668			1,253
Losses charged against allowance		(7,570	)		(5,228	)
Allowance balance at June 30	$	31,422		$	29,096

Note 5 – Mortgage Servicing Rights

The following table presents the components of mortgage banking income:

	Six Months Ended
	June 30
(in thousands)	2009		2008
Net gain on sale of loans held for sale	$	3,240	$	1,040
Net loan servicing income
Servicing fees		500		431
Late fees		33		31
Ancillary fees		388		114
Fair value adjustments		237		(245	)
Net loan servicing income (loss)		1,158		331
Mortgage banking income	$	4,398	$	1,371

Mortgage loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying balance sheets. Loans serviced for the benefit of others (primarily FHLMC) were $425 million at June 30, 2009 and $349 million at December 31, 2008. Servicing loans for others generally consists of collecting mortgage payments, maintaining escrow accounts, disbursing payments to investors, and processing foreclosures. Custodial escrow balances maintained in connection with the foregoing loan servicing, and included in demand deposits, were approximately $1.2 million at June 30, 2009 compared to $0.4 million at December 31, 2008.

Activity for capitalized mortgage servicing rights using the fair value method was as follows:

	Six Months Ended
	June 30
(in thousands)	2009			2008
Fair value, beginning of period	$	2,168		$	3,258
New servicing assets created		1,002			243
Change in fair value during the period due to:
Time decay (1)		(76	)		(91	)
Payoffs (2)		(392	)		(186	)
Changes in valuation inputs or assumptions (3)		705			32
Fair value, end of period	$	3,407		$	3,256

(1)	Represents decrease in value due to regularly scheduled loan principal payments and partial loan paydowns.

(2)	Represents decrease in value due to loans that paid off during the period.

(3)	Represents change in value resulting from market-driven changes in interest rates and prepayment speeds.

The fair value of capitalized mortgage servicing rights was $3.4 million at June 30, 2009 compared to $2.2 million at December 31, 2008 and $3.3 million at June 30, 2008. Fair values were determined by third-party valuations using a discount rate of 10.0% for the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and 10.06% for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and weighted average default rates of 1.5%, 1.7% and 1.3% respectively. Prepayment speeds generated using the Andrew Davidson Prepayment Model averaged 13.3% at June 30, 2009 compared to 20.7% at December 31, 2008 and 12.5% at June 30, 2008. MSR values are very sensitive to movement in interest rates as expected future net servicing income depends on the projected balance of the underlying loans, which can be greatly impacted by the level of prepayments. CTBI does not currently hedge against changes in the fair value of its MSR portfolio.

Note 6 – Borrowings

Short-term debt consists of the following:

(in thousands)	June 30 2009		December 31 2008
Subsidiaries:
Repurchase agreements	$	152,290	$	157,422
Federal funds purchased		19,712		11,492
Total short-term debt	$	172,002	$	168,914

On July 28, 2009, Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. was notified by Fifth Third Bank of the extension of the expiration date of our $12 million line of credit from July 29, 2009 to October 29, 2009. Currently, all $12 million remain available for general corporate purposes.

All federal funds purchased and the majority of repurchase agreements mature and reprice daily. The average rates paid for federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements on June 30, 2009 were 0.20% and 1.32%, respectively.

Federal Home Loan Bank advances consisted of the following monthly amortizing and term borrowings:

(in thousands)	June 30 2009		December 31 2008
Monthly amortizing	$	696	$	727
Term		60,000		60,000
	$	60,696	$	60,727

The advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank that require monthly principal payments were due for repayment as follows:

	Principal Payments Due by Period at June 30, 2009
(in thousands)	Total		Within 1 Year		2 Years		3 Years		4 Years		5 Years		After 5 Years
Outstanding advances, weighted average interest rate – 3.75%	$	696	$	638	$	8	$	8	$	8	$	8	$	26

The term advances that require the total payment to be made at maturity follow:

(in thousands)	June 30 2009		December 31 2008
Advance #154, 3.17%, due 8/04/09	$	20,000	$	20,000
Advance #155, 3.18%, due 9/02/09		40,000		40,000
Total Term Advances	$	60,000	$	60,000

Advances totaling $60.7 million at June 30, 2009 were collateralized by FHLB stock of $24.7 million and a blanket lien on qualifying first mortgage loans. As of June 30, 2009, CTBI had a $393 million FHLB borrowing capacity, leaving $241 million available for additional advances. The advances had fixed interest rates ranging from 1.00% to 4.00% with a weighted average rate of 3.18%. The advances are subject to restrictions or penalties in the event of prepayment. Advance #154 matured on August 4, 2009 and was renewed into a short term six month Advance #156 at 0.43% maturing on January, 29, 2010.

Long-term debt consists of the following:

(in thousands)		June 30 2009				December 31 2008
Junior subordinated debentures, 6.52%, due 6/1/37		$	61,341			$	61,341

CTBI has outstanding $61.3 million in junior subordinated debentures with an unconsolidated Delaware statutory trust subsidiary which in turn issued $59.5 million of capital securities in a private placement to institutional investors. The debentures, which mature 30 years from the date of issuance, are redeemable at par at CTBI's option after five years, were issued at a rate of 6.52% until June 1, 2012, and thereafter at a floating rate based on the three-month LIBOR plus 1.59%. The underlying capital securities were issued at the equivalent rates and terms. The proceeds of the debentures were used to fund the redemption on April 2, 2007 of all CTBI's outstanding 9.0% and 8.25% junior subordinated debentures in the total amount of $61.3 million.

Note 7 – Earnings Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30				June 30
(in thousands)	2009		2008		2009		2008
Numerator:
Net income	$	5,937	$	8,620	$	12,517	$	17,165

Denominator:
Basic earnings per share:
Weighted average shares		15,127		14,989		15,101		14,995
Diluted earnings per share:
Effect of dilutive stock options		92		163		93		150
Adjusted weighted average shares		15,219		15,152		15,194		15,145

Earnings per share:
Basic earnings per share	$	0.39	$	0.58	$	0.83	$	1.14
Diluted earnings per share		0.39		0.57		0.82		1.13

Options to purchase 405 thousand common shares were excluded from the diluted calculations above for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 because the exercise prices on the options were greater than the average market price for the period. Options to purchase 295 thousand common shares were excluded from the calculations for the three months ended June 30, 2008.

Note 8 – Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities

Effective January 1, 2008, CTBI adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value but does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. In this standard, the FASB clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. In support of this principle, SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

Level 1 Inputs – Unadjusted quoted process in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 Inputs - Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

Level 3 Inputs - Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.

The application of SFAS No. 157 in situations where the market for a financial asset is not active was clarified by the issuance of FSP No. FAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active,” in October 2008. FSP No. FAS 157-3 was effective for financial statements issued as of September 30, 2008 and thereafter. FSP No. FAS 157-3 did not have a material impact on the methods by which the Company determines the fair values of its financial assets. FSP No. FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly,” was issued in April 2009 and became effective for the second quarter of 2009. This FSP clarifies factors that determine whether transactions are orderly or not in evaluating the reliability of market transactions for fair value estimates. FSP No. FAS 157-2 deferred the application of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 with respect to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities beginning on January 1, 2009.

Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis

The following tables presents information about CTBI’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by CTBI to determine such fair value.

(in thousands)			Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2009 Using
	Fair Value June 30 2009		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	1,979	$	0	$	1,979	$	0
State and political subdivisions		48,428		0		48,428		0
U.S. government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through certificates		227,660		0		227,660		0
Collateralized mortgage obligations		1		0		1		0
Marketable equity securities		19,938		0		19,727		211
Mortgage servicing rights		3,407		0		0		3,407
Total recurring assets measured at fair value	$	301,413	$	0	$	297,795	$	3,618

(in thousands)			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2008 Using
	Fair Value December 31 2008		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	18,906	$	0	$	18,906	$	0
State and political subdivisions		39,844		0		39,844		0
U.S. government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through certificates		188,305		0		188,305		0
Collateralized mortgage obligations		1		0		1		0
Marketable equity securities		20,320		0		19,780		540
Mortgage servicing rights		2,168		0		0		2,168
Total recurring assets measured at fair value	$	269,544	$	0	$	266,836	$	2,708

U.S. Treasury and government agencies, State and political subdivision, U.S. government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through certificates, Collateralized mortgage obligations, Marketable equity securities – Level 2 Inputs. For these securities, CTBI obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other things.

Marketable equity securities – Level 3 Inputs. The securities owned by CTBI that were measured using Level 3 criteria are auction rate securities issued by FNMA. These securities were valued using an independent third party. For these securities, the valuation methods used were (1) a discounted cash flow model valuation, where the expected cash flows of the securities are discounted to the present using a yield that incorporates compensation for illiquidity and (2) a market comparables method, where the securities are valued based on indications, from the secondary market, of what discounts buyers demand when purchasing similar securities. Using these methods, the auction rate securities are classified as Level 3.

Mortgage Servicing Rights – Level 3 Inputs. CTBI records MSRs at fair value on a recurring basis with subsequent remeasurement of MSRs based on change in fair value. In determining fair value, CTBI utilizes the expertise of an independent third party. An estimate of the fair value of CTBI’s MSRs is determined by the independent third party utilizing assumptions about factors such as mortgage interest rates, discount rates, mortgage loan prepayment speeds, market trends and industry demand. All of CTBI’s MSRs are classified as Level 3.

Following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of recurring fair value measurements using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs:

Marketable Equity Securities (in thousands)	Three Months Ended June 30, 2009		Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Beginning balance	$	211	$	540
Total realized and unrealized gains and losses
included in net income		0		0
Transfer of Securities from Level 3 to Level 2		0		(329	)
Purchases, issuances, and settlements		0		0
Ending balance, June 30, 2009	$	211	$	211

Mortgage Servicing Rights (in thousands)	Three Months Ended June 30, 2009		Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Beginning balance	$	2,475	$	2,168
Total realized and unrealized gains and losses
included in net income		744		705
Transfer of Securities from Level 3 to Level 2		0		0
Purchases, issuances, and settlements		188		534
Ending balance, June 30, 2009	$	3,407	$	3,407

Assets Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis

Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are summarized below:

(in thousands)			Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2009 Using
	Fair Value June 30 2009		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Impaired loans	$	8,652	$	0	$	0	$	8,652
Other real estate/assets owned	$	14,232	$	0	$	0	$	14,232

(in thousands)			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2008 Using
	Fair Value December 31 2008		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Impaired loans	$	10,285	$	0	$	0	$	10,285

Impaired Loans – Level 3 Inputs. Loans considered impaired under SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, as amended by SFAS No. 118, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan — Income Recognition and Disclosure, are loans for which, based on current information and events, it is probable that the creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments to reflect (1) partial write-downs that are based on the observable market price or current appraised value of the collateral or (2) the full charge-off of the loan carrying value. Quarter-to-date losses on impaired loans were $2.4 million and year-to-date losses on impaired loans totaled $3.1 million at June 30, 2009.

Other real estate/assets owned – Level 3 Inputs. In accordance with the provisions of Statement 144, long-lived assets held for sale with a carrying amount of $8.4 million were written down to their fair value less costs to sale during the quarter. Long-lived assets are nonfinancial assets subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments to reflect partial write-downs that are based on the observable market price or current appraised value of the collateral. Losses on other real estate/assets owned for the quarter were $0.2 million and $0.5 million year-to-date at June 30, 2009.

The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

(in thousands)	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	125,779	$	125,779	$	140,878	$	140,878
Other short-term investments		29,500		29,470		100		100
Securities available-for-sale		298,006		298,006		267,376		267,376
Securities held-to-maturity		19,875		20,409		25,597		25,496
Loans, net (including impaired loans)		2,348,833		2,362,426		2,317,830		2,329,044
Loans held for sale		600		624		623		638
Federal Reserve Bank stock		4,348		4,348		4,340		4,340
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		24,700		24,700		24,700		24,700
Accrued interest receivable		11,965		11,965		12,926		12,926
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights		3,407		3,407		2,168		2,168
	$	2,867,013	$	2,881,134	$	2,796,538	$	2,807,666

Financial liabilities
Deposits	$	2,393,953	$	2,401,768	$	2,331,834	$	2,342,136
Short-term borrowings		172,002		172,278		168,914		168,866
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		60,696		60,842		60,727		61,245
Long-term debt		61,341		29,471		61,341		29,424
Accrued interest payable		9,994		9,994		5,570		5,570
	$	2,697,986	$	2,674,353	$	2,628,386	$	2,607,241

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:

Cash and Cash Equivalents – The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Other Short-term Investments – Fair values are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes.

Held-to-Maturity Securities – Fair values are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes.

Loans (net of the allowance for loan and lease losses and including impaired loans) – The fair value of fixed rate loans and variable rate mortgage loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. For other variable rate loans, the carrying amount approximates fair value.

Loans Held for Sale – The fair value is predetermined based on sale price.

Federal Reserve Bank Stock – The carrying value of Federal Reserve Bank stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the Federal Reserve Bank.

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock – The carrying value of Federal Home Loan Bank stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the Federal Home Loan Bank.

Accrued Interest Receivable – The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Deposits – The fair value of deposits is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Short-term Borrowings – The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank – The fair value of these fixed-maturity advances is estimated by discounting future cash flows using rates currently offered for advances of similar remaining maturities.

Long-term Debt – The fair value is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current rates.

Accrued Interest Payable – The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Other Financial Instruments – The estimated fair value for other financial instruments and off-balance sheet loan commitments approximates cost at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. Off-balance sheet loan commitments at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were $461.0 million and $481.8 million, respectively.

Commitments to Extend Credit – The fair value of commitments to extend credit is based upon the difference between the interest rate at which we are committed to make the loans and the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities, adjusted for the estimated volume of loan commitments actually expected to close. The fair value of such commitments is not material.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition

and Results of Operations

Overview

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (“CTBI”) is a bank holding company headquartered in Pikeville, Kentucky. At June 30, 2009, CTBI owned one commercial bank and one trust company. Through its subsidiaries, CTBI has seventy-six banking locations in eastern, northeastern, central, and south central Kentucky and southern West Virginia, and five trust offices across Kentucky. At June 30, 2009, CTBI had total consolidated assets of $3.0 billion and total consolidated deposits, including repurchase agreements, of $2.5 billion, making it the largest depository of Kentucky based deposits of any bank holding company headquartered in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Total shareholders’ equity at June 30, 2009 was $314.8 million.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the appropriate application of certain accounting policies, many of which require us to make estimates and assumptions about future events and their impact on amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and related notes. Since future events and their impact cannot be determined with certainty, the actual results will inevitably differ from our estimates. Such differences could be material to the consolidated financial statements.

We believe the application of our accounting policies and the estimates required therein are reasonable. These accounting policies and estimates are constantly reevaluated, and adjustments are made when facts and circumstances dictate a change. Historically, we have found our application of accounting policies to be appropriate, and actual results have not differed materially from those determined using necessary estimates.

See note 1 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further information regarding our accounting policies. We have identified the following critical accounting policies:

Cash and Cash Equivalents – Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions, and federal funds sold. Generally, federal funds are sold for one-day periods.

Investments – Management determines the classification of securities at purchase. We classify securities into held-to-maturity, trading, or available-for-sale categories. Held-to-maturity securities are those which we have the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity and are reported at amortized cost. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, investments in debt securities that are not classified as held-to-maturity and equity securities that have readily determinable fair values shall be classified in one of the following categories and measured at fair value in the statement of financial position:

a. Trading securities. Securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term (thus held for only a short period of time) shall be classified as trading securities. Trading generally reflects active and frequent buying and selling, and trading securities are generally used with the objective of generating profits on short-term differences in price.

b. Available-for-sale securities. Investments not classified as trading securities (nor as held-to-maturity securities) shall be classified as available-for-sale securities.

We do not have any securities that are classified as trading securities. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included as a separate component of shareholders’ equity, net of tax. If declines in fair value are not temporary, the carrying value of the securities is written down to fair value as a realized loss.

Gains or losses on disposition of securities are computed by specific identification for all securities except for shares in mutual funds, which are computed by average cost. Interest and dividend income, adjusted by amortization of purchase premium or discount, is included in earnings.

Available-for-Sale Securities – Available-for-sale securities are valued using the following valuation techniques:

Securities Available-for-Sale – Level 2 Inputs. For these securities, CTBI obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other things.

Securities Available-for-Sale – Level 3 Inputs. The securities owned by CTBI that were measured using Level 3 criteria are auction rate securities issued by FNMA. These securities were valued using an independent third party. For these securities, the valuation methods used were (1) a discounted cash flow model valuation, where the expected cash flows of the securities are discounted to the present using a yield that incorporates compensation for illiquidity and (2) a market comparables method, where the securities are valued based on indications, from the secondary market, of what discounts buyers demand when purchasing similar securities. Using these methods, the auction rate securities are classified as Level 3.

Loans – Loans with the ability and the intent to be held until maturity and/or payoff are reported at the carrying value of unpaid principal reduced by unearned interest and an allowance for loan and lease losses. Income is recorded on the level yield basis. Interest accrual is discontinued when management believes, after considering economic and business conditions, collateral value, and collection efforts, that the borrower’s financial condition is such that collection of interest is doubtful. Any loan greater than 90 days past due must be well secured and in the process of collection to continue accruing interest. Cash payments received on nonaccrual loans generally are applied against principal, and interest income is only recorded once principal recovery is reasonably assured. Loans are not reclassified as accruing until principal and interest payments are brought current and future payments appear reasonably certain.

Loan origination and commitment fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and the net amount amortized over the estimated life of the related loans, leases, or commitments as a yield adjustment.

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses – We maintain an allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) at a level that is appropriate to cover estimated credit losses on individually evaluated loans determined to be impaired, as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan and lease portfolio. Since arriving at an appropriate ALLL involves a high degree of management judgment, we use an ongoing quarterly analysis to develop a range of estimated losses. In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we use our best estimate within the range of potential credit loss to determine the appropriate ALLL. Credit losses are charged and recoveries are credited to the ALLL.

We utilize an internal risk grading system for commercial credits. Those larger commercial credits that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses are subject to individual review. The borrower’s cash flow, adequacy of collateral coverage, and other options available to CTBI, including legal remedies, are evaluated. The review of individual loans includes those loans that are impaired as SFAS 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. We evaluate the collectibility of both principal and interest when assessing the need for loss provision. Historical loss rates are applied to other commercial loans not subject to specific allocations. The ALLL allocation for this pool of commercial loans is established based on the historical average, maximum, minimum, and median loss ratios.

Homogenous loans, such as consumer installment, residential mortgages, and home equity lines are not individually risk graded. The associated ALLL for these loans is measured under SFAS 5, Accounting for Contingencies. The ALLL allocation for these pools of loans is established based on the average, maximum, minimum, and median loss ratios over the previous eight quarters.

Historical loss rates for commercial and retail loans are adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s judgment, reflect the impact of any current conditions on loss recognition. Factors that we consider include delinquency trends, current economic conditions and trends, strength of supervision and administration of the loan portfolio, levels of underperforming loans, level of recoveries to prior year’s charge offs, trend in loan losses, industry concentrations and their relative strengths, amount of unsecured loans and underwriting exceptions. These factors are reviewed quarterly and a weighted range developed with a “most likely” scenario determined. The total of each of these weighted factors is then applied against the applicable portion of the portfolio and the ALLL is adjusted accordingly.

Loans Held for Sale – Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or estimated market value in the aggregate. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized in a valuation allowance by charges to income.

Premises and Equipment – Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Capital leases are included in premises and equipment at the capitalized amount less accumulated amortization. Premises and equipment are evaluated for impairment on a quarterly basis.

Depreciation and amortization are computed primarily using the straight-line method. Estimated useful lives range up to 40 years for buildings, 2 to 10 years for furniture, fixtures, and equipment, and up to the lease term for leasehold improvements. Capitalized leased assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lives of the respective leases.

Other Real Estate – Real estate acquired by foreclosure is carried at the lower of the investment in the property or its fair value. Other real estate owned by CTBI included in other assets at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $20.4 million and $10.4 million, respectively.

Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangible – We evaluate total goodwill and core deposit intangible for impairment, based upon SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and SFAS 147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions, using fair value techniques including multiples of price/equity. Goodwill and core deposit intangible are evaluated for impairment on an annual basis or as other events may warrant.

Amortization of core deposit intangible is estimated at approximately $0.6 million annually for year one, approximately $0.4 million in year two, and approximately $0.1 million in years three and four.

Income Taxes – Income tax expense is based on the taxes due on the consolidated tax return plus deferred taxes based on the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates.

Earnings Per Share (“EPS”) – Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, excluding restricted shares.

Diluted EPS adjusts the number of weighted average shares of common stock outstanding by the dilutive effect of stock options, including restricted shares, as prescribed in SFAS 123R.

Segments – Management analyzes the operation of CTBI assuming one operating segment, community banking services. CTBI, through its operating subsidiaries, offers a wide range of consumer and commercial community banking services. These services include: (i) residential and commercial real estate loans; (ii) checking accounts; (iii) regular and term savings accounts and savings certificates; (iv) full service securities brokerage services; (v) consumer loans; (vi) debit cards; (vii) annuity and life insurance products; (viii) Individual Retirement Accounts and Keogh plans; (ix) commercial loans; (x) trust services; and (xi) commercial demand deposit accounts.

Bank Owned Life Insurance – CTBI’s bank owned life insurance policies are carried at their cash surrender value. We recognize tax-free income from the periodic increases in cash surrender value of these policies and from death benefits.

Mortgage Servicing Rights – Mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) are carried at fair market value with the implementation of SFAS 156 in January 2007. MSRs are valued using Level 3 inputs as defined in SFAS 157. The fair value is determined quarterly based on an independent third-party valuation using a discounted cash flow analysis and calculated using a computer pricing model. The computer valuation is based on key economic assumptions including the prepayment speeds of the underlying loans, the weighted-average life of the loan, the discount rate, the weighted-average coupon, and the weighted-average default rate, as applicable. Along with the gains received from the sale of loans, fees are received for servicing loans. These fees include late fees, which are recorded in interest income, and ancillary fees and monthly servicing fees, which are recorded in noninterest income. Costs of servicing loans are charged to expense as incurred. Changes in fair market value of the MSRs are reported in mortgage banking income.

Stock Options – At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, CTBI had a share-based employee compensation plan, which is described more fully in note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008, included in CTBI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. CTBI accounts for this plan under the recognition and measurement principles of SFAS 123R, Share-Based Payment.

Reclassifications – Certain reclassifications considered to be immaterial have been made in the prior year condensed consolidated financial statements to conform to current year classifications. These reclassifications had no effect on net income.

Dividends

The following schedule shows the quarterly cash dividends paid for the past six quarters:

Pay Date	Record Date	Amount Per Share
July 1, 2009	June 15, 2009	$	0.30
April 1, 2009	March 15, 2009	$	0.30
January 1, 2009	December 15, 2008	$	0.30
October 1, 2008	September 15, 2008	$	0.29
July 1, 2008	June 15, 2008	$	0.29
April 1, 2008	March 15, 2008	$	0.29

Statement of Income Review

CTBI reported earnings for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 of $5.9` million or $0.39 per basic share compared to $6.6 million or $0.44 per basic share earned during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 and $8.6 million or $0.58 per basic share earned during the second quarter of 2008. YTD June 30, 2009 earnings per basic share are $0.83 compared to $1.14 for the same period in 2008.

Earnings Summary (unaudited)
(in thousands except per share data)		2Q 2009			1Q 2009			2Q 2008		6 Months 2009			6 Months 2008
Net income	$	5,937		$	6,580		$	8,620		$	12,517		$	17,165
Earnings per share	$	0.39		$	0.44		$	0.58		$	0.83		$	1.14
Earnings per share (diluted)	$	0.39		$	0.43		$	0.57		$	0.82		$	1.13

Return on average assets		0.78	%		0.89	%		1.19	%		0.83	%		1.19	%
Return on average equity		7.52	%		8.51	%		11.21	%		8.01	%		11.20	%
Efficiency ratio		64.25	%		67.99	%		57.25	%		66.08	%		56.82	%
Tangible Common Equity		8.38	%		8.31	%		8.52	%		8.38	%		8.52	%

Dividends declared per share	$	0.30		$	0.30		$	0.29		$	0.60		$	0.58
Book value per share	$	20.80		$	20.68		$	20.43		$	20.80		$	20.43

Weighted average shares		15,127			15,076			14,989			15,101			14,995
Weighted average shares (diluted)		15,219			15,193			15,152			15,194			15,145

Second Quarter 2009 Highlights

CTBI continues to maintain a significantly higher level of capital than required by regulatory authorities to be designated as well-capitalized. On June 30, 2009, our Tangible Common Equity/Tangible Assets Ratio remained significantly higher than our peer institutions at 8.38%, our Tier 1 Leverage Ratio of 10.22% was 522 basis points higher than the 5.00% required, our Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio of 12.92% was 692 basis points higher than the required 6.00%, and our Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio of 14.17% was 417 basis points higher than the 10.00% regulatory requirement for this designation.

v	Net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 was $5.9 million compared to $6.6 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 and $8.6 million earned during the second quarter 2008. YTD net income as of June 30, 2009 was $12.5 million compared to $17.2 million earned during the same period in 2008.

CTBI's basic earnings per share decreased 11.4% from prior quarter and 32.8% from prior year second quarter as the FDIC special assessment and regular FDIC premiums impacted earnings by $2.3 million and allocations to the loan loss reserves increased by $2.5 million. The increase in loan loss reserves supports loan growth of $44.6 million and increased charge offs as problem commercial real estate loans with specific reserves are working through a slow legal process.

v	Our tangible common equity/tangible assets ratio remains strong at 8.38%.

While the net interest margin increased by 2 basis points during the quarter ended June 30, 2009, pressure continues on our net interest margin due to the current interest rate environment and economic conditions. Our net interest margin for the quarter decreased 25 basis points from the same quarter prior year.

v	Noninterest income for the second quarter 2009 increased 1.9% over prior quarter and 13.2% over prior year second quarter.

Noninterest expense decreased 0.9% from prior quarter and increased 15.3% from prior year second quarter primarily due to an increase in FDIC premiums to $2.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, a $0.8 million increase from prior quarter and a $2.2 million increase from same quarter last year.

v	During the quarter, two of our branches were consolidated for efficiency and accessibility resulting in a $0.2 million charge for additional depreciation.

v	Expenses associated with group medical and life insurance decreased $0.3 million at June 30, 2009 to $0.5 million, YTD 2009 expense is $1.3 million compared to $2.1 million for the same period in 2008.

Nonperforming loans increased $7.4 million at June 30, 2009 to $59.6 million compared to $52.2 million at prior quarter end and $44.2 million for prior year quarter ended June 30, 2008. The increase in nonperforming loans was in the 90 day and accruing classification and is primarily attributed to two loans totaling $6.0 million which have been determined to be well secured and in the process of collection. Nonperforming assets (nonperforming loans plus OREO) increased $12.6 million from prior quarter-end, March 31, 2009, and $26.7 million from prior year quarter-end, June 30, 2008.

v	Loan loss provision for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 was $4.5 million compared to $2.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. YTD loan loss provision of $6.5 million is a $1.5 million increase from the $5.0 million for the same period in 2008.

v	Our loan portfolio grew $44.6 million, an annualized rate of 7.7%, during the quarter with growth in all major categories. Year over year loan growth is $106.6 million or 4.7%.

v	Our investment portfolio increased $27.1 million for the quarter but declined $17.9 million year over year.

CTBI had basic weighted average shares outstanding of 15.1 million for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to 15.0 million for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. The following table sets forth on an annualized basis the return on average assets and return on average shareholders’ equity for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30						June 30
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Return on average shareholders' equity		7.52	%		11.21	%		8.01	%		11.20	%
Return on average assets		0.78	%		1.19	%		0.83	%		1.19	%

Net Interest Income

The Company saw modest improvement in its net interest margin of 2 basis points from prior quarter and experienced a decrease of 25 basis points compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2008. Net interest income for the quarter increased 3.8% from prior quarter and decreased 1.1% from prior year second quarter, although average earning assets increased 2.3% and 5.5%, respectively, for the same periods. The Company’s balance sheet is asset sensitive in the short time period but liability sensitive at the one year time period. Deposit repricing is occurring more slowly than loan repricing placing pressure on the margin; however, current margin improvement from repricing is evidenced as the yield on average earnings assets decreased 14 basis points from prior quarter in comparison to the 19 basis point decrease in the cost of interest bearing funds during the same period. Net interest income increased $0.9 million from prior quarter. YTD 2009 net interest income was $49.9 million compared to $52.0 million for the same period in 2008. Average earnings assets for the quarter ending June 30, 2009 increased $63.0 million from prior quarter and 2009 YTD average earning assets increased $127.5 million from the six months ended June 30, 2008.

The following table summarizes the annualized net interest spread and net interest margin for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30						June 30
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Yield on interest earning assets		5.39	%		6.26	%		5.46	%		6.51	%
Cost of interest bearing funds		2.25	%		3.01	%		2.34	%		3.23	%
Net interest spread		3.14	%		3.25	%		3.12	%		3.28	%

Net interest margin		3.63	%		3.88	%		3.62	%		3.94	%

Provision for Loan Losses

The analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses and selected ratios is set forth below:

	Six Months Ended
	June 30
(in thousands)	2009			2008
Allowance balance at January 1	$	30,821		$	28,054
Additions to allowance charged against operations		6,503			5,017
Recoveries credited to allowance		1,668			1,253
Losses charged against allowance		(7,570	)		(5,228	)
Allowance balance at June 30	$	31,422		$	29,096

Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans		1.32	%		1.28	%
Average loans, net of unearned income	$	2,352,664		$	2,251,892
Provision for loan losses to average loans, annualized		0.56	%		0.45	%
Loan charge-offs net of recoveries, to average loans, annualized		0.51	%		0.35	%

Net loan charge-offs for the quarter of $3.7 million, or 0.63% of average loans annualized, was an increase from prior quarter's and from the prior year second quarter’s 0.38%. Of the total net charge offs of $3.7 million, $2.6 million was charged off in commercial loans with specific reserve allocations for these loans of $2.1 million or 81% of total commercial loan charge offs. Residential real estate and other consumer loans are not generally provided a specific allocation during the credit review process. Allocations to loan loss reserves were $4.5 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 compared to $2.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 and $2.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. Our loan loss reserves as a percentage of total loans outstanding at June 30, 2009 increased to 1.32% from the 1.31% at March 31, 2009 and from the 1.28% at June 30, 2008. The adequacy of our loan loss reserves is analyzed quarterly and adjusted as necessary with a focus on maintaining appropriate reserves for potential losses.

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income for the second quarter 2009 increased 1.9% over prior quarter and 13.2% over prior year second quarter. The quarter over quarter increase included a $0.6 million increase in deposit service charges and a $0.7 million increase in loan related fees driven primarily by a $0.5 million increase in the fair value of our mortgage servicing rights. The increase from prior year second quarter included a $0.8 million increase in gains on sales of loans and a $0.4 million increase in loan related fees related to the fair value adjustment of mortgage servicing rights. Losses on sales of securities for the 2nd quarter 2009 were $4 thousand compared to a securities gain for the 1st quarter 2009 of $0.5 million. Noninterest income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 increased 17.8% over the same period in 2008. The year to date increase was driven by a $2.2 million increase in gains on sales of loans and a $0.9 million increase in loan related fees related to the fair value adjustment of mortgage servicing rights.

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense for the quarter decreased 0.9% from prior quarter and increased 15.3% from prior year second quarter. FDIC premium costs of $2.3 million during the second quarter were a $0.8 million increase quarter over quarter and a $2.2 million increase from the same quarter last year. The increase quarter over quarter was driven by a one time assessment imposed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to be paid during September 2009 but assessed as of June 30, 2009. The Company continues to experience higher legal fees, repossession expenses and other real estate owned expenses as it continues to work through problem loans associated with the decline in the real estate market in Central Kentucky. Personnel costs decreased by $0.6 million quarter over quarter as the Company experienced reduced health care costs and increased capitalization of loan related personnel costs.

Balance Sheet Review

The Company’s total assets at $3.0 billion increased 0.5% from prior quarter and 5.5% from prior year. Loans outstanding at June 30, 2009 were $2.4 billion reflecting an annualized 7.7% growth during the quarter and a 4.7% growth from June 30, 2008. The growth occurred in all segments of the portfolio with consumer loans increasing by $22.8 million, commercial loans increasing by $14.1 million and residential real estate increasing by $7.7 million. CTBI's investment portfolio increased an annualized 37.4% from prior quarter and decreased 5.4% from prior year. Federal funds sold and deposits in other banks decreased $56.7 million quarter over quarter and increased $61.8 million year over year. Deposits, including repurchase agreements, at $2.5 billion increased an annualized 2.2% from prior quarter and 5.2% from prior year.

Shareholders’ equity at June 30, 2009 was $314.8 million compared to $311.8 million at March 31, 2009 and $306.2 million at June 30, 2008. CTBI's annualized dividend yield to shareholders as of June 30, 2009 was 4.49%.

Loans

Loan growth occurred in all three major loan categories—commercial, residential, and consumer— during the first six months of 2009. The commercial loan portfolio increased $14.1 million, the consumer portfolio increased $22.8 million, and residential real estate loans increased $7.7 million.

The following tables summarize CTBI’s nonperforming loans as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

(in thousands)	Nonaccrual Loans		As a % of Loan Balances by Category			Restructured Loans		As a % of Loan Balances by Category			Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days or More		As a % of Loan Balances by Category			Total Loan Balances
June 30, 2009
Commercial construction	$	13,435		9.38	%	$	0		0.00	%	$	4,270		2.98	%	$	143,224
Commercial secured by real estate		16,938		2.41			0		0.00			9,966		1.42			702,892
Commercial other		5,142		1.41			0		0.00			1,937		0.53			365,415
Consumer real estate construction		107		0.22			0		0.00			139		0.29			48,763
Consumer real estate secured		3,889		0.66			0		0.00			3,104		0.53			589,639
Consumer other		0		0.00			0		0.00			648		0.13			511,541
Equipment lease financing		0		0.00			0		0.00			0		0.00			18,781
Total	$	39,511		1.66	%	$	0		0.00	%	$	20,064		0.84	%	$	2,380,255

(in thousands)	Nonaccrual Loans		As a % of Loan Balances by Category			Restructured Loans		As a % of Loan Balances by Category			Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days or More		As a % of Loan Balances by Category			Total Loan Balances
December 31, 2008
Commercial construction	$	21,602		13.81	%	$	0		0.00	%	$	3,741		2.39	%	$	156,425
Commercial secured by real estate		10,780		1.62			0		0.00			3,319		0.50			663,663
Commercial other		4,471		1.22			0		0.00			634		0.17			365,685
Consumer real estate construction		1,255		2.23			0		0.00			55		0.10			56,298
Consumer real estate secured		2,837		0.47			0		0.00			3,008		0.49			609,394
Consumer other		0		0.00			0		0.00			488		0.10			484,843
Equipment lease financing		0		0.00			0		0.00			0		0.00			12,343
Total	$	40,945		1.74	%	$	0		0.00	%	$	11,245		0.48	%	$	2,348,651

CTBI's total nonperforming loans were $59.6 million at June 30, 2009 compared to $52.2 million at March 31, 2009 and $44.2 million at June 30, 2008. Our loan portfolio management processes focus on the immediate identification, management, and resolution of problem loans to maximize recovery and minimize loss. Total impaired loans at June 30, 2009 were $35.4 million compared to $36.6 million at December 31, 2008.

Foreclosed properties increased during the second quarter 2009 to $20.4 million from the $15.2 million at March 31, 2009 and the $9.1 million at June 30, 2008, as problem real estate loans are slowly moving through the legal system, which remains strained due to current economic conditions and CTBI continues working through a prolonged foreclosure process. Sales of foreclosed properties during the second quarter 2009 totaled $1.9 million while new foreclosed properties totaled $7.3 million. Our nonperforming loans and foreclosed properties remain primarily concentrated in our Central Kentucky Region.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan and lease losses balance is maintained by management at a level considered adequate to cover anticipated probable losses based on past loss experience, general economic conditions, information about specific borrower situations including their financial position and collateral values, and other factors and estimates which are subject to change over time. This analysis is completed quarterly and forms the basis for allocation of the loan loss reserve and what charges to the provision may be required. For further discussion of the allowance for loan losses, see the Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates section presented earlier in Item 2.

Securities

CTBI uses its securities held-to-maturity for production of income and to manage cash flow needs through expected maturities. CTBI uses its securities available-for-sale for income and balance sheet liquidity management. Securities available-for-sale reported at fair value increased from $267.4 million as of December 31, 2008 to $298.0 million at June 30, 2009. The excess of market over cost increased from $1.4 million at December 31, 2008 to $3.1 million at June 30, 2009. Securities held-to-maturity decreased from $25.6 million to $19.9 million during the same period. Total securities as a percentage of total assets were 10.0% as of December 31, 2008 and 10.5% as of June 30, 2009.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

CTBI’s liquidity objectives are to ensure that funds are available for the subsidiary bank to meet deposit withdrawals and credit demands without unduly penalizing profitability. Additionally, CTBI’s objectives ensure that funding is available for CTBI to meet ongoing cash needs while maximizing profitability. CTBI continues to identify ways to provide for liquidity on both a current and long-term basis. The subsidiary bank relies mainly on core deposits, certificates of deposits of $100,000 or more, repayment of principal and interest on loans and securities and federal funds sold and purchased to create long-term liquidity. The subsidiary bank also has available the sale of securities under repurchase agreements, securities available-for-sale, and Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) borrowings as secondary sources of liquidity.

Due to the nature of the markets served by the subsidiary bank, management believes that the majority of its certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more and its repurchase agreements are no more volatile than its core deposits. During periods of interest rate volatility, these deposit balances have remained stable as a percentage of total deposits. In addition, arrangements have been made with correspondent banks for the purchase of federal funds on an unsecured basis, up to $20 million, if necessary, to meet CTBI’s liquidity needs.

CTBI owns securities with an estimated fair value of $298.0 million that are designated as available-for-sale and available to meet liquidity needs on a continuing basis. In addition, CTBI has $29.5 million in short term investments consisting of certificates of deposits in other banks that will mature prior to December 31, 2009. All investments in other banks are made at or below the FDIC insured maximum of $250 thousand. CTBI also has available Federal Home Loan Bank advances for both liquidity and management of its asset/liability position. FHLB advances remained at $60.7 million from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009. FHLB borrowing capacity at June 30, 2009 was $241.0 million. Long-term debt remained at $61.3 million from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009. The parent company has a $12 million line of credit. The line of credit was scheduled to mature on July 29, 2009. On July 28, 2009, Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. was notified by Fifth Third Bank of the extension of the expiration date of our $12 million line of credit from July 29, 2009 to October 29, 2009. Currently, all $12 million remain available for general corporate purposes. We believe that we will be able to obtain a one year renewal of a similar line of credit and expect to finalize such renewal in the near future. At June 30, 2009, federal funds sold were $34.1 million compared to $45.9 million at December 31, 2008. Additionally, management projects cash flows from CTBI’s investment portfolio to generate additional liquidity over the next 90 days.

CTBI generally relies upon net inflows of cash from financing activities, supplemented by net inflows of cash from operating activities, to provide cash for its investing activities. As is typical of many financial institutions, significant financing activities include deposit gathering, use of short-term borrowing facilities such as federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements, and issuance of long-term debt. CTBI’s primary investing activities include purchases of securities and loan originations.

The investment portfolio consists of investment grade short-term issues suitable for bank investments. The majority of the investment portfolio is in U.S. government and government sponsored agency issuances. The average life of the portfolio is 3.84 years. At the end of the second quarter 2009, available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities comprised approximately 86% of the total investment portfolio. The AFS portfolio was approximately 94% of equity capital, and seventy-four percent of the pledge eligible portfolio was pledged.

CTBI’s stock repurchase program began in December 1998 with the authorization to acquire up to 500,000 shares and was increased by an additional 1,000,000 shares in July 2000 and in May 2005. CTBI did not repurchase any shares of its common stock during the first six months of 2009. There are currently 288,519 shares remaining under CTBI’s current repurchase authorization. As of June 30, 2009, a total of 2,211,481 shares have been repurchased through this program.

In conjunction with maintaining a satisfactory level of liquidity, management monitors the degree of interest rate risk assumed on the consolidated balance sheet. CTBI monitors its interest rate risk by use of the static gap model and dynamic gap model at the one-year interval. CTBI uses the Sendero system to monitor its interest rate risk. The static gap model monitors the difference in interest rate sensitive assets and interest rate sensitive liabilities as a percentage of total assets that mature within the specified time frame. The dynamic gap model goes further in that it assumes that interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities will be reinvested. CTBI desires an interest sensitivity gap of not more than fifteen percent of total assets at the one-year interval.

CTBI’s principal source of funds used to pay dividends to shareholders and service long-term debt is the dividends it receives from the subsidiary bank. Various federal statutory provisions, in addition to regulatory policies and directives, limit the amount of dividends that subsidiary banks can pay without prior regulatory approval. These restrictions have had no major impact on CTBI’s dividend policy or its ability to service long-term debt, nor is it anticipated that they would have any major impact in the foreseeable future. During the remainder of 2009, approximately $24.0 million plus any remaining 2009 net profits can be paid by CTBI’s banking subsidiary without prior regulatory approval.

The primary source of capital for CTBI is the retention of earnings. CTBI paid cash dividends of $0.60 per share during the first six months of 2009. Basic earnings per share for the same period were $0.83. CTBI retained 27.7% of earnings for the first six months of 2009.

Under guidelines issued by banking regulators, CTBI and its subsidiary bank are required to maintain a minimum Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4% and a minimum total risk-based ratio of 8%. In order to be considered “well-capitalized” CTBI must maintain ratios of 6% and 10%, respectively. Risk-based capital ratios weight the relative risk factors of all assets and consider the risk associated with off-balance sheet items. CTBI must also maintain a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4%. The well-capitalized ratio for Tier 1 leverage is 5%. CTBI’s Tier 1 leverage, Tier 1 risk-based, and total risk-based ratios were 10.22%, 12.92%, and 14.17%, respectively, as of June 30, 2009, all exceeding the threshold for meeting the definition of well-capitalized.

As of June 30, 2009, management is not aware of any conditions or current recommendations by banking regulatory authorities which, if they were to be implemented, would have, or would be reasonably likely to have, a material adverse impact on CTBI’s liquidity, capital resources, or operations.

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

The majority of CTBI’s assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. Therefore, CTBI differs greatly from most commercial and industrial companies that have significant investment in nonmonetary assets, such as fixed assets and inventories. However, inflation does have an important impact on the growth of assets in the banking industry and on the resulting need to increase equity capital at higher than normal rates in order to maintain an appropriate equity to assets ratio. Inflation also affects other expenses, which tend to rise during periods of general inflation.

Management believes one of the most significant impacts on financial and operating results is CTBI’s ability to react to changes in interest rates. Management seeks to maintain an essentially balanced position between interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities in order to protect against the effects of wide interest rate fluctuations.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain of the statements contained herein that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. CTBI’s actual results may differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words or phrases such as “believe, ” “expect, ” “anticipate, ” “intend, ” “estimate, ” “may increase, ” “may fluctuate, ” and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will, ” “should, ” “would, ” and “could. ” These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, economic conditions, portfolio growth, the credit performance of the portfolios, including bankruptcies, and seasonal factors; changes in general economic conditions including the performance of financial markets, prevailing inflation and interest rates, realized gains from sales of investments, gains from asset sales, and losses on commercial lending activities; results of various investment activities; the effects of competitors’ pricing policies, changes in laws and regulations, competition, and demographic changes on target market populations’ savings and financial planning needs; industry changes in information technology systems on which we are highly dependent; failure of acquisitions to produce revenue enhancements or cost savings at levels or within the time frames originally anticipated or unforeseen integration difficulties; the adoption by CTBI of a Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) policy that provides guidance on the reporting of delinquent consumer loans and the timing of associated credit charge-offs for financial institution subsidiaries; and the resolution of legal proceedings and related matters. In addition, the banking industry in general is subject to various monetary and fiscal policies and regulations, which include those determined by the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and state regulators, whose policies and regulations could affect CTBI’s results. These statements are representative only on the date hereof, and CTBI undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements made.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest rate risk management focuses on maintaining consistent growth in net interest income within Board-approved policy limits. CTBI uses an earnings simulation model to analyze net interest income sensitivity to movements in interest rates. Given a 200 basis point increase to the yield curve used in the simulation model, it is estimated net interest income for CTBI would increase by 1.94 percent over one year and by 2.61 percent over two years. A 25 basis point decrease in the yield curve would decrease net interest income by an estimated 0.32 percent over one year and by 0.48 percent over two years. For further discussion of CTBI’s market risk, see the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Liquidity and Market Risk included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out by Community Trust Bancorp’s Management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President / Treasurer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and completely and accurately reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. The Company previously identified a material weakness in controls related to the review and approval of accounting conclusions and calculations relating to new and recurring accounting and reporting issues resulting in an error in the recognition of assessable FDIC premiums in the proper periods. On August 10, 2009 the Company filed an amended Form 10-Q/A for the first quarter ended March 31, 2009. Please see the amended Form 10-Q/A for additional information. As a result, our Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President / Treasurer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2009.

REMEDIATION PLAN OF MATERIAL WEAKNESS IN INTERNAL CONTROL

Management will make modifications to the internal control procedures for identifying, calculating and recording transactions to remediate this material weakness. The Company’s remediation action will include expansion of the review process to include the Executive Vice President / Treasurer’s review of all significant transactions including any balance sheet entries associated with these transactions to ensure that all such transactions are identified and recorded properly. We will expand procedures for analyzing and documenting new and recurring accounting and reporting issues, to ensure decisions are properly documented, reviewed and approved. We will expand the documentation process when questions arise regarding the proper accounting treatment of particular transactions to include in the documentation the nature of the issue, the resolution of the issue and the supporting documentation to support the position taken. Additionally, the Accounting Department within the Company will develop an emerging issues committee consisting of all senior level accounting managers that will be charged with meeting monthly to identify new accounting pronouncements and developments and determining the appropriate application to the Company’s financial reporting. This committee will communicate monthly to executive management and to the accounting staff the results of these meetings and any required changes in accounting policy or procedure. The status of remediation of the material weakness will be periodically reviewed with the Audit Committee, which will be advised of the progress, issues encountered and key decisions reached by Management relating to the ongoing remediation activities.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Except as described above, there were no changes in CTBI’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, CTBI’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	None

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	None

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	None

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	None

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	None

CTBI’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on April 28, 2009. The following items were approved:

1) Election of the following members to CTBI’s Board of Directors for the ensuing year.

Nominee	In Favor	Withheld
Charles J. Baird	12,722,001	314,697
Nick Carter	12,974,209	62,490
Nick A. Cooley	12,974,593	62,105
Jean R. Hale	12,895,040	141,659
James McGhee II	12,991,167	45,531
M. Lynn Parrish	12,962,634	74,064
Paul E. Patton	12,954,022	82,676
Dr. James R. Ramsey	12,986,101	59,508

2) Ratification of CTBI’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2009.

The votes of the shareholders on this item were as follows:

In Favor	Against	Abstained
12,903,095	45,283	69,619

Item 5.	Other Information:
	CTBI’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have furnished to the SEC the certifications with respect to this Form 10-Q that are required by Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Item 6.	a. Exhibits:
	(1) Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Exhibit 31.1 Exhibit 31.2
	(2) Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Exhibit 32.1 Exhibit 32.2

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, CTBI has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	COMMUNITY TRUST BANCORP, INC.

Date: August 10, 2009	By:	/s/ Jean R. Hale
		Jean R. Hale
		Chairman, President, and
		Chief Executive Officer



	By:	/s/ Kevin J. Stumbo
		Kevin J. Stumbo
		Executive Vice President and Treasurer
		(Principal Financial Officer)