form10q_3q2008.htm
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
|
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
|
|
For
the quarter ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
OR
|
|
|
¨
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
|
|
For
the transition period from [__________________] to
[________________]
|
|
Commission
file number 1-9876
|
Weingarten
Realty Investors
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
TEXAS
|
|
74-1464203
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
2600
Citadel Plaza Drive
|
|
|
P.O.
Box 924133
|
|
|
Houston,
Texas
|
|
77292-4133
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(713)
866-6000
|
(Registrant's
telephone number)
|
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the
Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.YES xNO ¨.
Indicate by check mark whether the
Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large
accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer x
|
Accelerated
filer ¨
|
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer ¨.
|
Smaller
reporting company ¨
|
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the
Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).YES
¨NO x.
As of October 31, 2008, there were
87,063,386 common shares of beneficial interest of Weingarten Realty Investors,
$.03 par value, outstanding.
PART
I-FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM
1. Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEINGARTEN
REALTY INVESTORS
|
|
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rentals
|
|
$ |
154,440 |
|
|
$ |
148,387 |
|
|
$ |
455,536 |
|
|
$ |
425,736 |
|
Other
|
|
|
4,307 |
|
|
|
4,542 |
|
|
|
10,456 |
|
|
|
9,716 |
|
Total
|
|
|
158,747 |
|
|
|
152,929 |
|
|
|
465,992 |
|
|
|
435,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
36,606 |
|
|
|
33,115 |
|
|
|
118,957 |
|
|
|
95,787 |
|
Operating
|
|
|
26,999 |
|
|
|
27,528 |
|
|
|
80,054 |
|
|
|
74,683 |
|
Ad
valorem taxes
|
|
|
20,517 |
|
|
|
19,528 |
|
|
|
56,028 |
|
|
|
51,669 |
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
5,816 |
|
|
|
6,537 |
|
|
|
19,774 |
|
|
|
19,650 |
|
Total
|
|
|
89,938 |
|
|
|
86,708 |
|
|
|
274,813 |
|
|
|
241,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Income
|
|
|
68,809 |
|
|
|
66,221 |
|
|
|
191,179 |
|
|
|
193,663 |
|
Interest
Expense
|
|
|
(38,884 |
) |
|
|
(38,470 |
) |
|
|
(112,838 |
) |
|
|
(110,183 |
) |
Interest
and Other Income
|
|
|
1,172 |
|
|
|
2,082 |
|
|
|
3,920 |
|
|
|
6,838 |
|
Equity
in Earnings of Real Estate Joint Ventures and
Partnerships, net
|
|
|
5,151 |
|
|
|
4,893 |
|
|
|
15,537 |
|
|
|
12,513 |
|
Income
Allocated to Minority Interests
|
|
|
(2,515 |
) |
|
|
(3,003 |
) |
|
|
(6,968 |
) |
|
|
(7,678 |
) |
Gain
(Loss) on Sale of Properties
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
986 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
3,010 |
|
Gain
on Land and Merchant Development Sales
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
4,199 |
|
|
|
8,240 |
|
|
|
8,150 |
|
Provision
for Income Taxes
|
|
|
(701 |
) |
|
|
(930 |
) |
|
|
(2,991 |
) |
|
|
(1,933 |
) |
Income
from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
34,407 |
|
|
|
35,978 |
|
|
|
96,180 |
|
|
|
104,380 |
|
Operating
Income from Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
2,001 |
|
|
|
2,357 |
|
|
|
7,361 |
|
Gain
on Sale of Properties from Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
4,520 |
|
|
|
6,284 |
|
|
|
53,983 |
|
|
|
59,684 |
|
Income
from Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
4,620 |
|
|
|
8,285 |
|
|
|
56,340 |
|
|
|
67,045 |
|
Net
Income
|
|
|
39,027 |
|
|
|
44,263 |
|
|
|
152,520 |
|
|
|
171,425 |
|
Dividends
on Preferred Shares
|
|
|
(9,114 |
) |
|
|
(5,982 |
) |
|
|
(25,842 |
) |
|
|
(16,485 |
) |
Redemption
Costs of Preferred Shares
|
|
|
(860 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,850 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net
Income Available to Common Shareholders
|
|
$ |
29,053 |
|
|
$ |
38,281 |
|
|
$ |
124,828 |
|
|
$ |
154,940 |
|
Net
Income Per Common Share - Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from Continuing Operations
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
Income
from Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
|
Net
Income
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
Net
Income Per Common Share - Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from Continuing Operations
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
Income
from Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
Net
Income
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
$ |
39,027 |
|
|
$ |
44,263 |
|
|
$ |
152,520 |
|
|
$ |
171,425 |
|
Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
gain (loss) on derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
|
Realized
loss on derivatives, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,204 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of loss on derivatives
|
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
|
658 |
|
Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
(4,024 |
) |
|
|
(5,735 |
) |
|
|
912 |
|
Comprehensive
Income
|
|
$ |
39,632 |
|
|
$ |
40,239 |
|
|
$ |
146,785 |
|
|
$ |
172,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
WEINGARTEN
REALTY INVESTORS
|
|
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
|
$ |
5,065,750 |
|
|
$ |
4,972,344 |
|
Accumulated
Depreciation
|
|
|
(818,070 |
) |
|
|
(774,321 |
) |
Property,
net
|
|
|
|
4,247,680 |
|
|
|
4,198,023 |
|
Investment
in Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships
|
|
|
308,516 |
|
|
|
300,756 |
|
Total
|
|
|
|
4,556,196 |
|
|
|
4,498,779 |
|
Notes
Receivable from Real Estate Joint Ventures and
Partnerships
|
|
|
166,161 |
|
|
|
81,818 |
|
Unamortized
Debt and Lease Costs
|
|
|
119,577 |
|
|
|
114,969 |
|
Accrued
Rent and Accounts Receivable (net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $9,639 in 2008 and $8,721 in
2007)
|
|
|
91,485 |
|
|
|
94,607 |
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
53,224 |
|
|
|
65,777 |
|
Restricted
Deposits and Mortgage Escrows
|
|
|
18,010 |
|
|
|
38,884 |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
116,004 |
|
|
|
98,509 |
|
Total
|
|
|
$ |
5,120,657 |
|
|
$ |
4,993,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
$ |
3,318,327 |
|
|
$ |
3,165,059 |
|
Accounts
Payable and Accrued Expenses
|
|
|
165,250 |
|
|
|
155,137 |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
88,822 |
|
|
|
104,439 |
|
Total
|
|
|
|
3,572,399 |
|
|
|
3,424,635 |
|
Minority
Interest
|
|
|
|
158,530 |
|
|
|
96,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders'
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Shares of Beneficial Interest - par value, $.03 per share; shares
authorized: 10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.75%
Series D cumulative redeemable preferred shares of beneficial
interest; 100 shares issued and outstanding in
2008 and 2007; liquidation preference
$75,000
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
6.95%
Series E cumulative redeemable preferred shares of beneficial
interest; 29 shares issued and outstanding in 2008 and
2007; liquidation preference $72,500
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
6.5%
Series F cumulative redeemable preferred shares of beneficial
interest, 140 shares issued; 140 and 80 shares outstanding in
2008 and 2007; liquidation preference $350,000 in 2008 and $200,000 in
2007
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Variable-rate
Series G cumulative redeemable preferred shares of beneficial
interest, 80 shares issued; none in 2008 and 80 shares outstanding in
2007; liquidation preference $200,000 in
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Common
Shares of Beneficial Interest - par value, $.03 per share; shares
authorized: 150,000; shares issued and outstanding: 84,044
in 2008 and 85,146 in 2007
|
|
|
2,533 |
|
|
|
2,565 |
|
Treasury
Shares of Beneficial Interest - par value, $.03 per share; none
in 2008 and 1,370 shares outstanding in 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
Accumulated
Additional Paid-In Capital
|
|
|
1,373,097 |
|
|
|
1,442,027 |
|
Net
Income in Excess of Accumulated Dividends
|
|
|
35,300 |
|
|
|
42,739 |
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
(21,210 |
) |
|
|
(15,475 |
) |
Shareholders'
Equity
|
|
|
1,389,728 |
|
|
|
1,471,823 |
|
Total
|
|
|
$ |
5,120,657 |
|
|
$ |
4,993,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
WEINGARTEN
REALTY INVESTORS
|
|
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
$ |
152,520 |
|
|
$ |
171,425 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
120,133 |
|
|
|
100,703 |
|
Equity
in earnings of real estate joint ventures and partnerships,
net
|
|
|
(15,537 |
) |
|
|
(12,513 |
) |
Income
allocated to minority interests
|
|
|
6,968 |
|
|
|
7,678 |
|
Gain
on land and merchant development sales
|
|
|
(8,240 |
) |
|
|
(8,150 |
) |
Gain
on sale of properties
|
|
|
(54,084 |
) |
|
|
(62,694 |
) |
Distributions
of income from unconsolidated real estate joint ventures and
partnerships
|
|
|
2,419 |
|
|
|
2,160 |
|
Changes
in accrued rent and accounts receivable
|
|
|
(4,829 |
) |
|
|
(5,336 |
) |
Changes
in other assets
|
|
|
(17,651 |
) |
|
|
(24,701 |
) |
Changes
in accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(28,385 |
) |
|
|
(22,199 |
) |
Other,
net
|
|
|
4,209 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
157,523 |
|
|
|
146,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
in property
|
|
|
(229,807 |
) |
|
|
(634,443 |
) |
Proceeds
from sale and disposition of properties, net
|
|
|
190,388 |
|
|
|
251,417 |
|
Change
in restricted deposits and mortgage escrows
|
|
|
21,049 |
|
|
|
66,086 |
|
Notes
receivable from real estate joint ventures and partnerships and
other receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances
|
|
|
(109,610 |
) |
|
|
(118,163 |
) |
Collections
|
|
|
25,161 |
|
|
|
74,569 |
|
Real
estate joint ventures and partnerships:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
(4,036 |
) |
|
|
(72,981 |
) |
Distributions
of capital
|
|
|
16,298 |
|
|
|
15,976 |
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(90,557 |
) |
|
|
(417,539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from issuance of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
386,660 |
|
|
|
150,092 |
|
Common
shares of beneficial interest
|
|
|
2,786 |
|
|
|
2,853 |
|
Preferred
shares of beneficial interest, net
|
|
|
118,013 |
|
|
|
387,678 |
|
Purchase
of marketable securities in connection with the legal defeasance of
mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,509 |
) |
Repurchase
of preferred shares of beneficial interest, net
|
|
|
(195,824 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repurchase
of common shares of beneficial interest, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,359 |
) |
Principal
payments of debt
|
|
|
(229,370 |
) |
|
|
(62,384 |
) |
Common
and preferred dividends paid
|
|
|
(159,649 |
) |
|
|
(144,160 |
) |
Debt
issuance costs paid
|
|
|
(958 |
) |
|
|
(839 |
) |
Other,
net
|
|
|
(1,177 |
) |
|
|
1,016 |
|
Net
cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(79,519 |
) |
|
|
259,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(12,553 |
) |
|
|
(11,188 |
) |
Cash
and cash equivalents at January 1
|
|
|
65,777 |
|
|
|
71,003 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at September 30
|
|
$ |
53,224 |
|
|
$ |
59,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
WEINGARTEN
REALTY INVESTORS
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note
1. Interim Financial
Statements
The
condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report are
unaudited; however, amounts presented in the condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2007 are derived from our audited financial statements
at that date. In our opinion, all adjustments necessary for a fair
presentation of such financial statements have been included. Such
adjustments consisted of normal recurring items. Interim results are
not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.
The
condensed consolidated financial statements and notes are presented as permitted
by Form 10-Q and certain information included in our annual financial statements
and notes has been condensed or omitted. These condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Business
Weingarten
Realty Investors is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) organized under the
Texas Real Estate Investment Trust Act. We, and our predecessor
entity, began the ownership and development of shopping centers and other
commercial real estate in 1948. Our primary business is leasing space
to tenants in the shopping and industrial centers we own or lease. We
also manage centers for joint ventures in which we are partners or for other
outside owners for which we charge fees.
We
operate a portfolio of properties that include neighborhood and community
shopping centers and industrial properties of approximately 73.5 million square
feet. We have a diversified tenant base with our largest tenant
comprising only 2.8% of total rental revenues during 2008.
We
currently operate, and intend to operate in the future, as a REIT.
Basis
of Presentation
Our
condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of our
subsidiaries and certain partially owned real estate joint ventures or
partnerships which meet the guidelines for consolidation. All
significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated.
Our
financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. Such statements require
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts on
our condensed consolidated financial statements. Actual results could
differ from these estimates.
Real
Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships
To
determine the method of accounting for partially owned real estate joint
ventures and partnerships, we first apply the guidelines set forth in Financial
Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 46R, “Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities.” In March 2008, we contributed 18
neighborhood/community shopping centers located in Texas with an aggregate value
of approximately $227.5 million, and aggregating more than 2.1 million square
feet, to a joint venture. We sold an 85% interest in this joint
venture to AEW Capital Management on behalf of one of its institutional clients
and received proceeds of approximately $216.1 million. Financing
totaling $154.3 million was placed on the properties and guaranteed by
us. This venture is a variable interest entity and due to our
guarantee of the debt, we have consolidated this joint venture. Our
maximum exposure to loss associated with this joint venture is primarily limited
to our guarantee of the debt, which was approximately $154.3 million at
September 30, 2008.
Partially
owned real estate joint ventures and partnerships over which we exercise
financial and operating control are consolidated in our financial
statements. In determining if we exercise financial and operating
control, we consider factors such as ownership interest, authority to make
decisions, kick-out rights and substantive participating
rights. Partially owned real estate joint ventures and partnerships
where we have the ability to exercise significant influence, but do not exercise
financial and operating control, are accounted for using the equity
method.
Our
investments in partially owned real estate joint ventures and partnerships are
reviewed for impairment, periodically, if events or circumstances change
indicating that the carrying amount of our investments may not be
recoverable. The ultimate realization of our investments in partially
owned real estate joint ventures and partnerships is dependent on a number of
factors, including the performance of each investment and market
conditions. We will record an impairment charge if we determine that
a decline in the value of an investment is other than temporary. No
impairment was recorded for both the quarter and the nine months ended September
30, 2008 or 2007. However, due to the current credit and real estate
market conditions, there is no certainty that an impairment would not occur in
the future.
Restricted
Deposits and Mortgage Escrows
Restricted
deposits and mortgage escrows consist of escrow deposits held by lenders
primarily for property taxes, insurance and replacement reserves and restricted
cash that is held in a qualified escrow account for the purposes of completing
like-kind exchange transactions. At September 30, 2008 and December
31, 2007, we had $1.0 million and $21.3 million held for like-kind exchange
transactions, respectively, and $17.0 million and $17.6 million held in escrow
related to our mortgages, respectively.
Per
Share Data
Net
income per common share - basic is computed using net income available to common
shareholders and the weighted average shares outstanding. Net income
per common share - diluted includes the effect of potentially dilutive
securities for the periods indicated as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income available to common shareholders
|
|
$ |
29,053 |
|
|
$ |
38,281 |
|
|
$ |
124,828 |
|
|
$ |
154,940 |
|
Income
attributable to operating partnership units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income available to common shareholders - diluted
|
|
$ |
29,053 |
|
|
$ |
38,281 |
|
|
$ |
124,828 |
|
|
$ |
158,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding - basic
|
|
|
83,795 |
|
|
|
85,470 |
|
|
|
83,739 |
|
|
|
85,914 |
|
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share
options and awards
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
Operating
partnership units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding - diluted
|
|
|
84,316 |
|
|
|
86,464 |
|
|
|
84,288 |
|
|
|
89,410 |
|
Options
to purchase 2.0 million and .5 million common shares of beneficial interest for
the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, were not
included in the calculation of net income per common share - diluted because the
exercise prices were greater than the average market price of our common shares
of beneficial interest for the period. Options to purchase 1.2
million and .5 million common shares of beneficial interest for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, were not included in the
calculation of net income per common share - diluted because the exercise prices
were greater than the average market price of our common shares of beneficial
interest for the period. For the three months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007, 2.4 million and 2.2 million, respectively, of operating
partnership units were not included in the calculation of net income per common
share – diluted because these units had an anti-dilutive effect. For
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, 2.4 million of operating partnership
units was not included in the calculation of net income per common share –
diluted because these units had an anti-dilutive effect.
As of
October 7, 2008, we sold 3.0 million common shares of beneficial interest at an
average share price of $34.20. Had this transaction occurred on
January 1, 2008, earnings per common share – basic and earnings per common share
– diluted for the three months ended September 30, 2008 would have both
decreased by $.02 and $.01, respectively, and earnings per common share – basic
and earnings per common share – diluted for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 would have both decreased by $.05.
Cash
Flow Information
All
highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less are
considered cash equivalents. We issued common shares of beneficial
interest valued at $.4 million and $12.9 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, in exchange for interests in real
estate joint ventures and partnerships, which had been formed to acquire
properties. We also accrued $23.4 million and $11.3 million as of
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, associated with the construction of
property. Cash payments for interest on debt, net of amounts
capitalized, of $137.6 million and $138.0 million were made during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Cash payments
of $4.9 million and $.05 million for income taxes were made during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
In
association with property acquisitions and investments in unconsolidated real
estate joint ventures, items assumed were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
63,957 |
|
Obligations
under Capital Leases
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
12,888 |
|
Minority
Interest
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
27,932 |
|
Net
Assets and Liabilities
|
|
|
8,450 |
|
|
|
13,175 |
|
In
connection with the sale of improved properties, we received notes receivable
totaling $3.6 million during the nine months ended September 30,
2008. Net assets and liabilities were reduced by $59.8 million during
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from the reorganization of three joint
ventures, two of which were previously consolidated, to tenancy-in-common
arrangements where we have a 50% interest. This net reduction from
the reorganization of three joint ventures was offset by the assumption of debt
totaling $33.2 million. In conjunction with the disposition of
properties completed for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we defeased
two mortgage loans totaling $21.2 million and transferred marketable securities
totaling $21.5 million in connection with the legal defeasance of these two
loans.
Reclassifications
The
reclassification of prior years’ operating results for certain properties to
discontinued operations was made to conform to the current year
presentation. This reclassification had no impact on previously
reported net income, net income per share, shareholders’ equity or cash
flows.
Note
2. Newly Issued
Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 (“SFAS 157”), “Fair Value
Measurements.” This statement defines fair value and establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles
and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The key
changes to current practice are (1) the definition of fair value, which focuses
on an exit price rather than an entry price; (2) the methods used to measure
fair value, such as emphasis that fair value is a market-based measurement, not
an entity-specific measurement, as well as the inclusion of an adjustment for
risk, restrictions and credit standing and (3) the expanded disclosures about
fair value measurements. This statement does not require any new fair
value measurements.
We
adopted SFAS 157 in the first quarter of 2008 regarding our financial assets and
liabilities currently recorded or disclosed at fair value. The FASB
has issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement
No. 157” which defers the provisions of SFAS 157 relating to nonfinancial assets
and liabilities, and delays implementation by us until January 1,
2009. SFAS 157 has not and is not expected to materially affect how
we determine fair value, but it has resulted in certain additional disclosures
(see Note 15).
In
October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-3, “Determining
the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not
Active,” to clarify the provisions of SFAS 157 relating to valuing a financial
asset when the market for that asset is not active. This FSP was effective
upon issuance and has not had a material effect on our consolidated financial
statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158 (“SFAS 158”), “Employers’
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – An
Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132R.” This new
standard requires an employer to: (a) recognize in its statement of financial
position an asset for a plan’s overfunded status or a liability for a plan’s
underfunded status; (b) measure a plan’s assets and its obligations that
determine its funded status as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year (with
limited exceptions); and (c) recognize changes in the funded status of a defined
benefit postretirement plan in the year in which the changes
occur. These changes will be reported in comprehensive
income. The requirement to measure plan assets and benefit
obligations as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end statement of
financial position (the “Measurement Provision”) is effective for us on December
31, 2008. We have assessed the potential impact of the Measurement
Provision of SFAS 158 and concluded that its adoption will not have a material
effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 (“SFAS 159”), “The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” SFAS 159 expands
opportunities to use fair value measurement in financial reporting and permits
entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items
at fair value. This statement was effective for us on January 1,
2008, and we have elected not to measure any of our current eligible financial
assets or liabilities at fair value upon adoption; however, we do have the
option to elect to measure eligible financial assets or liabilities acquired in
the future at fair value.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) (“SFAS 141R”), “Business
Combinations.” SFAS 141R expands the original guidance’s definition
of a business. It broadens the fair value measurement and recognition
to all assets acquired, liabilities assumed and interests transferred as a
result of business combinations. SFAS 141R requires expanded
disclosures to improve the ability to evaluate the nature and financial effects
of business combinations. SFAS 141R is effective for us for business
combinations made on or after January 1, 2009. While we have not
formally quantified the effect, we expect the adoption of SFAS 141R to have a
material effect on our accounting for future acquisition of
properties.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 (“SFAS 160”), “Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No.
51.” SFAS 160 requires that a noncontrolling interest in an
unconsolidated entity be reported as equity and any losses in excess of an
unconsolidated entity’s equity interest be recorded to the noncontrolling
interest. The statement requires fair value measurement of any
noncontrolling equity investment retained in a deconsolidation. SFAS
160 is effective for us on January 1, 2009 and many provisions will be applied
retrospectively. We are currently evaluating the impact SFAS 160 will
have on our consolidated financial statements.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 (“SFAS 161”), “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No.
133.” SFAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s
derivative and hedging activities. SFAS 161 is effective for us as
amended by FASB Staff Position No. FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4 (see below) on
December 31, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact SFAS 161
will have to the disclosures included in our consolidated financial
statements.
In April
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 142-3 (“FSP FAS 142-3”),
“Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets.” FSP FAS
142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal and
extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair
value of assets considered in a business combination. FSP FAS 142-3
is effective for us on January 1, 2009. We are currently evaluating
the impact FSP FAS 142-3 will have on our consolidated financial
statements.
In May
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-1 (“FSP APB 14-1”),
“Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon
Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement).” FSP APB 14-1 will
require that the initial debt proceeds from the sale of our convertible and
exchangeable senior debentures be allocated between a liability component and an
equity component in a manner that will reflect our effective nonconvertible
borrowing rate. The resulting debt discount would be amortized using
the effective interest method over the period the debt is expected to be
outstanding as additional interest expense. FSP APB 14-1 is effective
for us on January 1, 2009 and requires retroactive application. Upon
the adoption of FSP APB 14-1, we estimate the unamortized debt discount (as of
September 30, 2008) to be approximately $25.2 million to be included as a
reduction of debt and approximately $43.5 million as accumulated additional
paid-in capital on our consolidated balance sheet. We estimate
incremental interest expense to be approximately $7.7 million for the first nine
months of 2008 and $7.9 million and $3.2 million for the years ended December
31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162 (“SFAS 162”), “The Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles.” SFAS 162 identifies the sources of
accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used
in presenting financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States. SFAS 162 is effective for
us on November 15, 2008. We believe that the adoption of this
standard on its effective date will not have a material effect on our
consolidated financial statements.
In June
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1(“FSP EITF 03-6-1”),
“Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are
Participating Securities.” FSP EITF 03-6-1 considers unvested
share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) as participating securities.
These participating securities shall be included in the computation of
earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method under FASB Statement No.
128. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for us on January 1, 2009. All
prior-period earnings per share data presented shall be adjusted
retrospectively. We are currently evaluating the impact FSP EITF 03-6-1
will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In
September 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4
(“FSP FAS 133-1”), “Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees:
An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and
Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161.” FSP
FAS 133-1 requires disclosures by sellers of credit derivatives; additional
disclosures on current status of payment/performance risk of guarantees and
clarified the effective date of SFAS 161. FSP FAS 133-1 is effective for
us on December 31, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact FSP FAS
133-1 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
Note
3. Derivatives and
Hedging
We
occasionally hedge the future cash flows of our debt transactions, as well as
changes in the fair value of our debt instruments, principally through interest
rate swaps with major financial institutions. At September 30, 2008,
we had two interest rate swap contracts designated as fair value hedges with an
aggregate notional amount of $50.0 million that convert fixed interest payments
at rates of 4.2% to variable interest payments. We have determined
that they are highly effective in limiting our risk of changes in the fair value
of fixed-rate notes attributable to changes in market interest
rates.
At
December 31, 2007, we had two forward-starting interest rate swap contracts with
an aggregate notional amount of $118.6 million, which were designated as cash
flow hedges to mitigate the risk of future fluctuations in interest rates on
forecasted issuances of long-term debt.
On March
20, 2008, the cash flow hedge was completed through the issuance of $154.3
million of fixed-rate long-term debt issued by a joint venture that is
consolidated by us. A loss of $12.8 million was recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive loss based on the fair value of the interest
rate swap contracts on that date. On March 27, 2008, the interest
rate swap contracts were settled resulting in a loss of $10.0
million. For the period between the completion of the cash flow hedge
and the settlement of the swap contracts, a gain of $2.8 million was recognized
as a reduction of interest expense.
Changes
in the fair value of fair value hedges, as well as changes in the fair value of
the hedged item attributable to the hedge risk, are recorded in earnings each
reporting period. For the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007, these changes in fair value were offset through
earnings. The derivative instruments at September 30, 2008 were
reported at their fair values in other assets, net of accrued interest, of $.2
million, and we had no derivative instruments reported in other
liabilities. At December 31, 2007, derivative instruments were
reported at their fair values in other liabilities, net of accrued interest, of
$5.8 million, and we had no derivative instruments reported in other
assets.
As of
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the balance in accumulated other
comprehensive loss relating to derivatives was $17.5 million and $11.8 million,
respectively. Amounts amortized to interest expense were $.6 million
and $.2 million during the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, and $1.5 million and $.4 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Within the next 12 months,
approximately $2.0 million of the balance in accumulated other comprehensive
loss is expected to be amortized to interest expense.
For the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the interest rate swaps
decreased interest expense and increased net income by $.1 million and $.5
million, respectively, and decreased the average interest rate of our debt by
..02% for both periods. The interest rate swaps increased interest
expense and decreased net income by $.2 million and $.5 million for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, and increased the
average interest rate of our debt by .02% for both periods. We could
be exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by the counter-parties;
however, management believes the likelihood of such nonperformance is
unlikely.
Note
4. Debt
Our debt
consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
payable to 2030 at 4.5% to 8.8%
|
|
$ |
2,801,902 |
|
|
$ |
2,876,445 |
|
Unsecured
notes payable under revolving credit agreements
|
|
|
483,000 |
|
|
|
255,000 |
|
Obligations
under capital leases
|
|
|
29,725 |
|
|
|
29,725 |
|
Industrial
revenue bonds payable to 2015 at 3.8% to 7.6%
|
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
|
3,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
3,318,327 |
|
|
$ |
3,165,059 |
|
The
grouping of total debt between fixed and variable-rate as well as between
secured and unsecured is summarized below (in thousands):
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
to interest rate (including the effects of interest rate
swaps):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate
debt
|
|
$ |
2,768,894 |
|
|
$ |
2,843,320 |
|
Variable-rate
debt
|
|
|
549,433 |
|
|
|
321,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
3,318,327 |
|
|
$ |
3,165,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
to collateralization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured
debt
|
|
$ |
2,284,724 |
|
|
$ |
2,095,506 |
|
Secured
debt
|
|
|
1,033,603 |
|
|
|
1,069,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
3,318,327 |
|
|
$ |
3,165,059 |
|
We have a $575 million
unsecured revolving credit facility held by a syndicate of banks that expires in
February 2010 and provides a one-year extension option available at our
request. Borrowing rates under this facility float at a margin over
LIBOR, plus a facility fee. The borrowing margin and facility fee,
which are currently 42.5 and 15.0 basis points, respectively, are priced off a
grid that is tied to our senior unsecured credit ratings. This
facility retains a competitive bid feature that allows us to request bids for
amounts up to $287.5 million from each of the syndicate banks, allowing us an
opportunity to obtain pricing below what we would pay using the pricing
grid.
At
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the balance outstanding under the
revolving credit facility was $483.0 million at a variable interest rate of 4.3%
and $255.0 million at a variable interest rate of 5.4%,
respectively. We also have an agreement for a $30 million unsecured
and uncommitted overnight facility with a bank that we use for cash management
purposes, of which no amounts were outstanding at September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007. Letters of credit totaling $10.2 million and $9.2
million were outstanding under the revolving credit facility at September 30,
2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The available balance under
our revolving credit agreement was $81.8 million and $310.8 million at September
30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2008, the maximum balance and weighted average balance
outstanding under both facilities combined were $503.0 million and $344.0
million, respectively, at a weighted average interest rate of
3.6%. During 2007, the maximum balance and weighted average balance
outstanding under both facilities combined were $312.4 million and $96.7
million, respectively, at a weighted average interest rate of 6.1%.
In March
2008, we contributed assets to a joint venture with an institutional
investor. In conjunction with this transaction, the joint venture
issued $154.3 million of fixed-rate long-term debt with an average life of 7.3
years at an average rate of 5.4% that we guaranteed. We received all
of the proceeds from the issuance of this debt and such proceeds were used to
reduce amounts outstanding under our $575 million revolving credit
facility.
In
January 2008, we elected to repay at par a fixed-rate 8.33% mortgage totaling
$121.8 million that was secured by 19 supermarket-anchored shopping centers in
California originally acquired in April 2001.
As of
December 31, 2007, the balance of secured debt that was assumed in conjunction
with 2007 acquisitions was $99.4 million. A capital lease obligation
totaling $12.9 million was assumed and subsequently settled in
2007.
Various
leases and properties, and current and future rentals from those leases and
properties, collateralize certain debt. At September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, the carrying value of such property aggregated $1.7 billion
and $1.9 billion, respectively.
Scheduled
principal payments on our debt (excluding $483.0 million due under our revolving
credit agreements, $21.0 million of certain capital leases, $.2 million fair
value of interest rate swaps and $25.2 million of non-cash debt-related items)
are due during the following years (in thousands):
2008
|
|
$ |
24,487 |
|
2009
|
|
|
113,420 |
|
2010
|
|
|
128,651 |
|
2011
|
|
|
316,785 |
|
2012
|
|
|
335,198 |
|
2013
|
|
|
334,851 |
|
2014
|
|
|
374,863 |
|
2015
|
|
|
249,780 |
|
2016
|
|
|
147,123 |
|
2017
|
|
|
29,391 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
734,444 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,788,993 |
|
Our
various debt agreements contain restrictive covenants, including minimum
interest and fixed charge coverage ratios, minimum unencumbered interest
coverage ratios, minimum net worth requirements and maximum total debt
levels. We believe we were in compliance with all restrictive
covenants as of September 30, 2008.
In July
2006, we priced an offering of $575 million of 3.95% convertible senior
unsecured notes due 2026, which closed on August 2, 2006. Interest is
payable semi-annually in arrears on February 1 and August 1 of each year,
beginning February 1, 2007. The debentures are convertible under
certain circumstances for our common shares of beneficial interest at an initial
conversion rate of 20.3770 common shares of beneficial interest per $1,000 of
principal amount of debentures (an initial conversion price of
$49.075). In addition, the conversion rate may be adjusted if certain
change in control transactions or other specified events occur on or prior to
August 4, 2011. Upon the conversion of debentures, we will deliver
cash for the principal return, as defined, and cash or common shares of
beneficial interest, at our option, for the excess of the conversion value, as
defined, over the principal return. The debentures are redeemable for
cash at our option beginning in 2011 for the principal amount plus accrued and
unpaid interest. Holders of the debentures have the right to require
us to repurchase their debentures for cash equal to the principal of the
debentures plus accrued and unpaid interest in 2011, 2016 and 2021 and in the
event of a change in control.
In
connection with the issuance of these debentures, we filed a registration
statement related to the resale of the debentures and the common shares of
beneficial interest issuable upon the conversion of the
debentures. This registration statement has been declared effective
by the SEC.
Note
5. Preferred
Shares
In June
and July of 2008, we redeemed $120 million and $80 million of depositary shares,
respectively, retiring all of the Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Shares. Each depositary share represented one-hundredth of a Series G
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Share. These depositary shares were
redeemed, at our option, at a redemption price of $25 multiplied by a graded
rate per depositary share based on the date of redemption plus any accrued and
unpaid dividends thereon. Upon the redemption of these shares, the related
original issuance costs of $1.9 million were reported as a deduction in arriving
at net income available to common shareholders. In September 2007,
these depositary shares were issued through a private placement, and net
proceeds of $193.6 million were used to repay amounts outstanding under our
credit facilities. The Series G Preferred Shares paid a variable-rate
quarterly dividend through July 2008 and had a liquidation preference of $2,500
per share. The variable-rate dividend was calculated on the period’s
three-month LIBOR rate plus a percentage determined by the number of days
outstanding. At December 31, 2007, the variable-rate dividend was
5.9%.
We issued
$150 million and $200 million of depositary shares on June 6, 2008 and January
30, 2007, respectively. Each depositary share represents
one-hundredth of a Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Share. The depositary shares are redeemable, in whole or in part, on
or after January 30, 2012 at our option, at a redemption price of $25 per
depositary share, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon. The
depositary shares are not convertible or exchangeable for any of our other
property or securities. The Series F Preferred Shares pay a 6.5%
annual dividend and have a liquidation value of $2,500 per
share. Series F Preferred Shares issued in June 2008 were issued at a
discount, resulting in an effective rate of 8.25%. Net proceeds of
$118.1 million and $194.0 million in June 2008 and January 2007, respectively,
were used to repay amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facilities and
for general business purposes. Subsequent to the 2008 issuance, our
revolving credit facilities were used to finance the partial redemption of the
Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares as described above.
In July
2004, we issued $72.5 million of depositary shares with each share representing
one-hundredth of a Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Share. The depositary shares are redeemable at our option on or after
July 8, 2009, in whole or in part, for cash at a redemption price of $25 per
depositary share, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon. The
depositary shares are not convertible or exchangeable for any of our other
property or securities. The Series E preferred shares pay a 6.95%
annual dividend and have a liquidation value of $2,500 per share.
In April
2003, $75 million of depositary shares were issued with each share representing
one-thirtieth of a Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Share. The depositary shares are currently redeemable at our option,
in whole or in part, for cash at a redemption price of $25 per depositary share,
plus any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon. The depositary shares
are not convertible or exchangeable for any of our property or
securities. The Series D preferred shares pay a 6.75% annual dividend
and have a liquidation value of $750 per share.
Note
6. Common Shares of
Beneficial Interest
In July
2007, our Board of Trust Managers authorized a common share repurchase program
as part of our ongoing investment strategy. Under the terms of the
program, we may purchase up to a maximum value of $300 million of our common
shares of beneficial interest during the next two years. Share
repurchases may be made in the open market or in privately negotiated
transactions at the discretion of management and as market conditions
warrant. We anticipate funding the repurchase of shares primarily
through the proceeds received from our property disposition program, as well as
from general corporate funds.
During
2007, we repurchased 2.8 million common shares of beneficial interest at an
average share price of $37.12 and cancelled 1.4 million common shares of
beneficial interest in both 2008 and 2007. As of September 30, 2008,
the remaining value of common shares of beneficial interest available to be
repurchased is $196.7 million.
Subsequent
to September 30, 2008, we sold 3.0 million common shares of beneficial interest
at $34.20 per share. Net proceeds from this offering were $98.2
million and were used to repay indebtedness outstanding under our revolving
credit facilities and for other general corporate purposes.
Note
7. Treasury Shares of
Beneficial Interest
At
December 31, 2007, a total of 1.4 million common shares of beneficial interest
were repurchased by us at an average share price of $36.47. These
shares were subsequently retired on January 11, 2008.
Note
8. Property
Our
property consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$ |
975,927 |
|
|
$ |
974,145 |
|
Land
held for development
|
|
|
111,905 |
|
|
|
62,033 |
|
Land
under development
|
|
|
169,217 |
|
|
|
223,827 |
|
Buildings
and improvements
|
|
|
3,547,558 |
|
|
|
3,533,037 |
|
Construction
in-progress
|
|
|
261,143 |
|
|
|
179,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
5,065,750 |
|
|
$ |
4,972,344 |
|
The
following carrying charges were capitalized (in thousands):
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$ |
5,236 |
|
|
$ |
6,665 |
|
|
$ |
15,376 |
|
|
$ |
19,156 |
|
Ad
valorem taxes
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
2,032 |
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
5,863 |
|
|
$ |
7,303 |
|
|
$ |
17,408 |
|
|
$ |
20,734 |
|
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we invested $139.4 million in new
development projects. During 2008, we commenced three new development
projects, of which two are located in Texas and one in Florida. Of
these, one property is held in a 70%-owned consolidated real estate joint
venture. We also disposed of eight shopping centers, one industrial
property and 21 land parcels.
Note
9. Discontinued
Operations
During
the first nine months of 2008, one industrial center located in Texas and
eight shopping centers, five of which were located in Texas, one in California
and two in Louisiana, were sold. During 2007, we sold one industrial
center located in Texas and 17 shopping centers, nine of which were located in
Texas, three in Louisiana, two each in Colorado and Illinois, and one in
Georgia. The operating results of these properties have been
reclassified and reported as discontinued operations in the
Condensed Statements of Consolidated Income and Comprehensive Income in
accordance with SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets," as well as any gains on the respective dispositions for all
periods presented. Revenues recorded in operating income from
discontinued operations for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
totaled $.2 million and $4.9 million, respectively, and $5.3 million and
$19.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at
December 31, 2007 were $88.3 million of property and $35.4 million of
accumulated depreciation related to the property sold during the nine months
ended September 30, 2008.
The
discontinued operations reported for the first nine months of 2008 had no debt
that was required to be repaid upon their disposition.
During
the first nine months of 2007, we incurred a net loss of $.4 million on the
defeasance of two loans totaling $21.2 million that were required to be settled
upon their disposition. These defeasance costs were recognized as
interest expense and have been reclassified and reported as discontinued
operations.
We
elected not to allocate other consolidated interest expense to discontinued
operations because the interest savings to be realized from the proceeds of the
sale of these operations was not material.
Note
10. Notes Receivable from Real
Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships
We have
ownership interests in a number of real estate joint ventures and
partnerships. Notes receivable from these entities bear interest
ranging from 4.0% to 10.0% at September 30, 2008 and 5.7% to 10.0% at December
31, 2007. These notes are due at various dates through 2028 and are
generally secured by real estate assets. Interest income recognized
on these notes was $1.2 million and $.8 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $2.9 million and $1.6
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Note
11. Investment in Real
Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships
We own
interests in real estate joint ventures or limited partnerships and have
tenancy-in-common interests in which we exercise significant influence, but do
not have financial and operating control. We account for these
investments using the equity method, and our interests range from 7.8% to
75%. Combined condensed financial information of these ventures (at
100%) is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
Condensed Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
$ |
1,786,708 |
|
|
$ |
1,660,915 |
|
Accumulated
depreciation
|
|
|
(96,985 |
) |
|
|
(71,998 |
) |
Property
– net
|
|
|
1,689,723 |
|
|
|
1,588,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
227,817 |
|
|
|
238,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,917,540 |
|
|
$ |
1,827,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
(primarily mortgage payables)
|
|
$ |
397,129 |
|
|
$ |
378,206 |
|
Amounts
payable to Weingarten Realty Investors
|
|
|
170,704 |
|
|
|
87,191 |
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
|
130,533 |
|
|
|
138,150 |
|
Accumulated
equity
|
|
|
1,219,174 |
|
|
|
1,223,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,917,540 |
|
|
$ |
1,827,083 |
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
Condensed Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
39,021 |
|
|
$ |
39,561 |
|
|
$ |
117,344 |
|
|
$ |
106,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
10,868 |
|
|
|
9,760 |
|
|
|
30,099 |
|
|
|
25,296 |
|
Interest
|
|
|
5,491 |
|
|
|
7,014 |
|
|
|
14,808 |
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
Operating
|
|
|
6,218 |
|
|
|
5,786 |
|
|
|
19,146 |
|
|
|
15,574 |
|
Ad
valorem taxes
|
|
|
4,480 |
|
|
|
3,955 |
|
|
|
13,834 |
|
|
|
12,288 |
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
1,786 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
27,866 |
|
|
|
26,791 |
|
|
|
79,673 |
|
|
|
71,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain
on land and merchant development sales
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
933 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain
(loss) on sale of properties
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
11,595 |
|
|
$ |
12,765 |
|
|
$ |
38,639 |
|
|
$ |
34,763 |
|
Our
investment in real estate joint ventures and partnerships, as reported on our
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, differs from our proportionate share of
the entities' underlying net assets due to basis differentials, which arose upon
the transfer of assets to the joint ventures. The basis
differentials, which totaled $14.9 million and $15.8 million at September 30,
2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, are generally amortized over the
useful lives of the related assets.
Fees
earned by us for the management of these real estate joint ventures and
partnerships totaled, in millions, $1.4 for both the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $4.4 and $3.5 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
During
the first nine months of 2008, a 25%-owned unconsolidated real estate joint
venture acquired a 4,000 square foot building located in Port Charlotte,
Florida. A 50%-owned unconsolidated real estate joint venture was
formed for the purposes of developing an industrial building in Houston, Texas,
while a 32%-owned unconsolidated real estate joint venture commenced
construction of a retail property in Salt Lake City, Utah.
In July
2008, a 47.75%-owned unconsolidated real estate joint venture (“WMB”)
acquired an 83.34% interest (“WMMDHB”) in a 919,000 square foot new development
to be constructed in Aurora, Colorado. WMB guaranteed debt issued to
WMMDHB resulting in WMMDHB being classified as a variable interest entity of
WMB. WMB’s maximum exposure to loss is primarily limited to the
guarantee of the debt, which was approximately $15.6 million at September 30,
2008.
In August
2008, we executed a real estate limited partnership with a foreign institutional
investor to purchase up to $250 million of retail properties in various states,
of which our capital commitment is $17.6 million that will be funded as
properties are acquired, but no later than June 30, 2011. Our
ownership in this unconsolidated real estate limited partnership is
20.1%. As of September 30, 2008, no properties have been
purchased.
During
the first nine months of 2007, a 25%-owned unconsolidated joint venture acquired
two shopping centers. Cole Park Plaza is located in Chapel
Hill, North Carolina, and Sunrise West is located in Sunrise,
Florida. A 50%-owned unconsolidated joint venture was formed for the
purpose of developing a retail shopping center. A 20%-owned
unconsolidated joint venture acquired seven industrial properties, one each in
Ashland and Chester, Virginia, two in Colonial Heights, Virginia and three in
Richmond, Virginia. We invested in a 20% owned unconsolidated joint
venture, which acquired three retail power centers: Pineapple Commons
located in Stuart, Florida; Mansell Crossing located in Alpharetta, Georgia; and
Preston Shepard Place located in Plano, Texas. We acquired a 10%
interest in a retail shopping center located in San Jose, California through a
tenancy-in-common arrangement.
In March
2007, three joint ventures, two of which were previously consolidated, were
reorganized and our 50% interest in each of these properties is now held in a
tenancy-in-common arrangement.
Note
12. Federal Income Tax
Considerations
We
qualify as a REIT under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, and
therefore, no tax is imposed on us for our taxable income distributed to
shareholders. To maintain our REIT status, we must distribute at
least 90% of our ordinary taxable income to our shareholders and meet certain
income source and investment restriction requirements. Our
shareholders must report their share of income distributed in the form of
dividends.
Our
taxable REIT subsidiary is subject to federal, state and local income
taxes. During the three months ended September 30, 2008 and
2007, we have recorded a federal income tax provision of $.02 million and
$.3 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007, we have recorded a federal income tax provision of $.8 million
and $.5 million, respectively. Our deferred tax assets at September
30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were $.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively,
with the deferred tax liabilities totaling $1.3 million and $1.4 million,
respectively. Also, an accrued tax payable of $.6 million and
$2.3 million has been recorded at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively, in association with this tax.
We have
reviewed our tax positions under FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”),
“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109.” FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income
taxes recognized in the financial statements. The interpretation
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial
statement recognition of a tax position taken, or expected to be taken, in a tax
return. A tax position may only be recognized in the financial
statements if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained
upon examination. We believe it is more likely than not that our tax
positions will be sustained in any tax examinations.
In May
2006, the State of Texas enacted a new business tax (the “Revised Texas
Franchise Tax”) that replaced its existing franchise tax. In general,
legal entities that do business in Texas are subject to the Revised Texas
Franchise Tax. Most REITs are subject to the Revised Texas Franchise
Tax, whereas they were previously exempt. The Revised Texas Franchise
Tax became effective for franchise tax reports due on or after January 1, 2008
and is based on revenues earned during the 2007 fiscal year.
Because
the Revised Texas Franchise Tax is determined by applying a tax rate to a base
that considers both revenues and expenses, it is considered an income tax and is
accounted for in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for
Income Taxes.”
During
the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, we recorded a provision for
the Revised Texas Franchise Tax of $.7 million and $.6 million,
respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and
2007, we have recorded a provision for the Revised Texas Franchise Tax of $2.2
million and $1.5 million, respectively. The deferred tax
assets associated with this tax each totaled $.1 million as of September
30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, and the deferred tax liability associated with
this tax totaled $.2 million and $.1 million as of September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively. Also, an accrued tax payable of $2.2
million and $2.0 million has been recorded at September 30, 2008 and December
31, 2007, respectively, in association with this tax.
Note
13. Commitments and
Contingencies
We
participate in six ventures, structured as DownREIT partnerships, which have
properties in Arkansas, California, Georgia, North Carolina, Texas and
Utah. As a general partner, we have operating and financial control
over these ventures and consolidate their operations in our condensed
consolidated financial statements. These ventures allow the outside
limited partners to put their interest to the partnership for our common shares
of beneficial interest or an equivalent amount in cash. We may
acquire any limited partnership interests that are put to the partnership, and
we have the option to redeem the interest in cash or a fixed number of our
common shares of beneficial interest, at our discretion. We also
participate in two real estate ventures that have properties in Florida and
Texas that allow their outside partners to put their interest to operating
partnership units to us for our common shares of beneficial interest or an
equivalent amount in cash. We have the option to redeem these units
in cash or a fixed number of our common shares of beneficial interest, at our
discretion. During the first nine months of 2008 and 2007, we issued
common shares of beneficial interest valued at $.4 million and $12.9 million,
respectively, in exchange for certain of these limited partnership interests or
operating partnership units. The aggregate redemption value of these
operating partnership units was approximately $84 million and $76 million as of
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
In April
2007, we acquired an industrial building located in
Virginia. This purchase transaction includes an earnout
provision of approximately $6 million that is contingent upon the lease up of
vacant space by the property seller. This contingency agreement
expires in 2009. We have an estimated obligation of $2.3 million and
$5.6 million recorded as of September 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007. Since inception of this obligation, $3.3 million has been
paid. Amounts paid or accrued under such earnouts are treated as
additional purchase price and capitalized to the related property.
In
January 2007, we acquired two retail properties in Arizona. This
purchase transaction includes an earnout provision of approximately $29 million
that is contingent upon the subsequent development of space by the property
seller. This contingency agreement expires in 2010. We
have an estimated obligation of $7.6 million and $4.2 million recorded as of
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Since
inception of this obligation, $5.2 million has been paid. Amounts
paid or accrued under such earnouts are treated as additional purchase price and
capitalized to the related property.
In August
2006, we acquired a portfolio of five properties, including four properties in
Georgia and one in Florida. The purchase agreement allows for the
subsequent development and leasing of an additional phase of Brookwood
Marketplace by the property seller. If the terms of the purchase
agreement are met by the seller, the purchase price would be increased by
approximately $6.9 million. This agreement expired in August 2008;
however, we have entered into a 180-day extension period per the terms of the
purchase agreement. We have an estimated obligation of $1.3 million
recorded as of September 30, 2008, and we had no obligation recorded for this
contingency as of December 31, 2007. Since inception of this
obligation, no amounts have been paid. Amounts paid or accrued under
such earnouts are treated as additional purchase price and capitalized to the
related property.
We are
subject to numerous federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and
regulations in the areas where we own or operate properties. We are
not aware of any material contamination, which may have been caused by us or any
of our tenants that would have a material effect on our condensed consolidated
financial statements.
As part
of our risk management activities, we have applied and been accepted into
state-sponsored environmental programs which will limit our expenses if
contaminants need to be remediated. We also have an environmental
insurance policy that covers us against third party liabilities and remediation
costs.
While we
believe that we do not have any material exposure to environmental remediation
costs, we cannot give absolute assurance that changes in the law or new
discoveries of contamination will not result in increased liabilities to
us.
Related
to our investment in a redevelopment project in Sheridan, Colorado that is held
in an unconsolidated real estate joint venture, we, our joint venture partner
and the joint venture have each provided a guarantee for the payment of any
annual sinking fund requirement shortfalls on bonds issued in connection with
the project. The Sheridan Redevelopment Agency issued $97 million of
Series A bonds used for an urban renewal project. The bonds are to be
repaid with incremental sales and property taxes and a public improvement fee
(“PIF”) to be assessed on future retail sales. The incremental taxes
and PIF are to remain intact until the bond liability has been paid in full,
including any amounts we may have to provide. We have evaluated and
determined that the fair value of the guarantee is nominal. However,
due to the guarantee, a liability has been recorded by the joint venture equal
to amounts funded under the bonds.
In July
2008, a 47.75%-owned unconsolidated real estate joint venture (“WMB”)
acquired an 83.34% interest (“WMMDHB”) in a 919,000 square foot new development
to be constructed in Aurora, Colorado. WMB provided a guarantee on
debt obtained by WMMDHB. WMB’s maximum exposure to loss is limited to
the guarantee of the debt, which was approximately $15.6 million at September
30, 2008. We have evaluated and determined that the fair value of the
guarantee is nominal.
In August
2008, we executed a real estate limited partnership with a foreign institutional
investor to purchase up to $250 million of retail properties in various states,
of which our capital commitment is $17.6 million that will be funded as
properties are acquired, but no later than June 30, 2011. Our
ownership in this unconsolidated real estate limited partnership is
20.1%. As of September 30, 2008, no properties have been
purchased.
We are
involved in various matters of litigation arising in the normal course of
business. While we are unable to predict with certainty the amounts
involved, our management and counsel are of the opinion that, when such
litigation is resolved, our resulting liability, if any, will not have a
material effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Note
14. Identified Intangible Assets
and Liabilities
Identified
intangible assets and liabilities associated with our property acquisitions are
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identified
Intangible Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Above-Market
Leases (included in Other Assets)
|
|
$ |
18,657 |
|
|
$ |
18,590 |
|
Above-Market
Leases – Accumulated Amortization
|
|
|
(9,159 |
) |
|
|
(7,323 |
) |
Below-Market
Assumed Mortgages (included in Debt)
|
|
|
2,072 |
|
|
|
2,072 |
|
Below-Market
Assumed Mortgages – Accumulated Amortization
|
|
|
(455 |
) |
|
|
(246 |
) |
Valuation
of In Place Leases (included in Unamortized Debt and Lease
Costs)
|
|
|
64,481 |
|
|
|
59,498 |
|
Valuation
of In Place Leases – Accumulated Amortization
|
|
|
(27,478 |
) |
|
|
(22,308 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
48,118 |
|
|
$ |
50,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identified
Intangible Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below-Market
Leases (included in Other Liabilities)
|
|
$ |
38,607 |
|
|
$ |
39,141 |
|
Below-Market
Leases – Accumulated Amortization
|
|
|
(16,233 |
) |
|
|
(11,949 |
) |
Above-Market
Assumed Mortgages (included in Debt)
|
|
|
53,893 |
|
|
|
58,414 |
|
Above-Market
Assumed Mortgages – Accumulated Amortization
|
|
|
(24,746 |
) |
|
|
(24,517 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
51,521 |
|
|
$ |
61,089 |
|
These
identified intangible assets and liabilities are amortized over the terms of the
acquired leases or the remaining lives of the assumed mortgages.
The net
amortization of above-market and below-market leases increased rental revenues
by $.9 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 and
by $2.6 million and $2.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
and 2007, respectively. The estimated net amortization of these
intangible assets and liabilities will increase rental revenues for each of the
next five years as follows (in thousands):
2009
|
|
$ |
2,750 |
|
2010
|
|
|
1,926 |
|
2011
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
2012
|
|
|
1,139 |
|
2013
|
|
|
994 |
|
The
amortization of the in place lease intangible recorded in depreciation and
amortization, was $1.9 million and $2.1 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $6.4 million and $6.2 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
estimated amortization of this intangible asset will increase depreciation and
amortization for each of the next five years as follows (in
thousands):
2009
|
|
$ |
6,899 |
|
2010
|
|
|
5,905 |
|
2011
|
|
|
4,616 |
|
2012
|
|
|
3,722 |
|
2013
|
|
|
2,898 |
|
The
amortization of above-market and below-market assumed mortgages decreased
interest expense by $1.2 million and $1.6 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and by $4.5 million and $5.1 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The estimated amortization of these intangible assets
and liabilities will decrease interest expense for each of the next five years
as follows (in thousands):
2009
|
|
$ |
4,476 |
|
2010
|
|
|
3,823 |
|
2011
|
|
|
2,526 |
|
2012
|
|
|
1,355 |
|
2013
|
|
|
908 |
|
Note
15. Fair Value
Measurements
On
January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS 157 for our financial assets and
liabilities. SFAS
157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies
to reported balances that are required or permitted to be measured at fair value
under existing accounting pronouncements; accordingly, the standard does not
require any new fair value measurements of reported balances.
SFAS 157
emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific
measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined
based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset
or liability. As a basis for considering market participant
assumptions in fair value measurements, SFAS 157 establishes a fair value
hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on
market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity
(observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy)
and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions
(unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the
hierarchy).
Level 1
inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets
or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are
inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the
asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may
include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as
well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted
prices), such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly
quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the
asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as
there is little, if any, related market activity. In instances where
the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from
different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value
hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the
lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its
entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to
the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers
factors specific to the asset or liability.
Investments
held in grantor trusts
These
assets are valued based on publicly quoted market prices.
Derivative
instruments
We use
interest rate swaps with major financial institutions to manage our interest
rate risk. The
valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation
techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of
each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the
derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based
inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The
fair values of our interest rate swaps have been determined using the market
standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or
payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or
receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an
expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable
market interest rate curves.
To comply
with the provisions of SFAS 157, we incorporate credit valuation adjustments to
appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective
counter-party’s nonperformance risk in the fair value
measurements. In adjusting the fair value of our derivative contracts
for the effect of nonperformance risk, we have considered the impact of netting
and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral, thresholds and
guarantees.
Although
we have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives
fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation
adjustments associated with our derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as
estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by
itself and its counter-parties. However, as of September 30, 2008, we
have assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments
on the overall valuation of our derivative positions and have determined that
the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of
our derivatives. As a result, we have determined that the derivative
valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy.
Assets
and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30,
2008, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy in which those
measurements fall, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Quoted
Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets and Liabilities
(Level
1)
|
|
|
Significant
Other Observable Inputs
(Level
2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level
3)
|
|
|
Fair
Value at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
instruments
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
Investments
held in grantor trusts
|
|
$ |
31,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,376 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
31,376 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$ |
31,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
associated with derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
50,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
50,157 |
|
Deferred
compensation plan obligations
|
|
$ |
12,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,940 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
12,940 |
|
|
$ |
50,157 |
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$ |
63,097 |
|
We do not
have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis whose
fair value measurements use significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as of
September 30, 2008.
Note
16. Share Options and
Awards
In 1992,
we adopted the Employee Share Option Plan that grants 100 share options to every
employee, excluding officers, upon completion of each five-year interval of
service. This plan expires in 2012 and provides options for a maximum
of 225,000 common shares of beneficial interest, of which .2 million is
available for future grant of share options at September 30,
2008. Share options granted under this plan are exercisable
immediately.
In 1993,
we adopted the Incentive Share Option Plan that provided for the issuance of up
to 3.9 million common shares of beneficial interest, either in the form of
restricted share awards or share options. This plan expired in 2002,
but some share options issued under the plan remain outstanding as of
September 30, 2008. The share options granted to non-officers
vest over a three-year period beginning after the grant date, and for officers
vest over a seven-year period beginning two years after the grant
date.
In 2001,
we adopted the Long-term Incentive Plan for the issuance of share options and
share awards. In 2006, the maximum number of common shares of
beneficial interest issuable under this plan was increased to 4.8 million common
shares of beneficial interest, of which 1.8 million is available for the future
grant of share options or share awards at September 30, 2008. This
plan expires in 2011. The share options granted to non-officers vest
over a three-year period beginning after the grant date, and share options and
restricted share awards for officers vest over a five-year period after the
grant date. Restricted share awards granted to trust managers and
share options or share awards granted to retirement eligible employees are
expensed immediately.
The grant
price for the Employee Share Option Plan is equal to the closing price of our
common shares of beneficial interest on the date of grant. The grant
price of the Long-term Incentive Plan is calculated as an average of the high
and low of the quoted fair value of our common shares of beneficial interest on
the date of grant. In both plans, these share options expire upon
termination of employment or 10 years from the date of grant. In the
Long-term Incentive Plan, restricted share awards for officers and trust
managers are granted at no purchase price. Our policy is to recognize
compensation expense for equity awards ratably over the vesting period, except
for retirement eligible amounts. For the three months ended September
30, 2008 and 2007, compensation expense, net of forfeitures, associated with
share options and restricted share awards totaled $1.1 million and $1.3 million,
of which $.3 million was capitalized for both periods. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, compensation expense, net of
forfeitures, associated with share options and restricted share awards totaled
$3.8 million and $3.9 million, of which $1.0 million was capitalized for both
periods.
The fair
value of share options is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option pricing method based on the expected weighted average assumptions in the
following table. The dividend yield is an average of the historical
yields at each record date over the estimated expected life. We
estimate volatility using our historical volatility data for a period of 10
years, and the expected life is based on historical data from an option
valuation model of employee exercises and terminations. The risk-free
rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of
grant. The fair value and weighted average assumptions are as
follows:
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
value per share
|
|
$ |
3.07 |
|
|
$ |
4.96 |
|
Dividend
yield
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
Expected
volatility
|
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
|
18.2 |
% |
Expected
life (in years)
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
Following
is a summary of the share option activity for the nine months ended September
30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Under
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding,
January 1, 2008
|
|
|
2,840,290 |
|
|
$ |
32.66 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
832,106 |
|
|
|
32.22 |
|
Forfeited
or expired
|
|
|
(87,283 |
) |
|
|
35.69 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(180,365 |
) |
|
|
21.99 |
|
Outstanding,
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
3,404,748 |
|
|
$ |
33.04 |
|
The total
intrinsic value of options exercised for the three months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007 was $.9 million and $.3 million, respectively. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the total intrinsic value of
options exercised was $2.2 million and $4.2 million, respectively. As
of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, there was approximately $3.8
million and $3.3 million, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested share options, which is expected to be amortized over a
weighted average of 1.9 years and 2.0 years, respectively.
The
following table summarizes information about share options outstanding and
exercisable at September 30, 2008:
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Average
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
Range
of
|
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Value
|
|
Exercise
Prices
|
|
Number
|
|
Life
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
(000’s)
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Life
|
|
|
(000’s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$17.94
- $26.91
|
|
|
890,439 |
|
3.3
years
|
|
$ |
22.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
717,397 |
|
|
$ |
21.72 |
|
3.1
years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$26.92
- $40.38
|
|
|
2,010,697 |
|
7.5
years
|
|
$ |
34.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
774,018 |
|
|
$ |
34.99 |
|
6.0
years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$40.39
- $49.62
|
|
|
503,612 |
|
8.2
years
|
|
$ |
47.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,734 |
|
|
$ |
47.47 |
|
8.2
years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,404,748 |
|
6.5
years
|
|
$ |
33.04 |
|
|
$ |
8,954 |
|
|
|
1,602,149 |
|
|
$ |
29.91 |
|
4.9
years
|
|
$ |
9,228 |
|
A summary
of the status of unvested restricted share awards for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 is as follows:
|
|
Unvested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Average
Grant
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Date
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding,
January 1, 2008
|
|
|
117,539 |
|
|
$ |
41.45 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
125,480 |
|
|
|
32.69 |
|
Vested
|
|
|
(15,283 |
) |
|
|
35.57 |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(11,361 |
) |
|
|
36.77 |
|
Outstanding,
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
216,375 |
|
|
$ |
37.03 |
|
As of
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, there was approximately $5.3
million and $4.4 million, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested restricted share awards, which is expected to be amortized
over a weighted average of 2.6 years and 2.7 years, respectively.
Note
17. Employee Benefit
Plans
We
sponsor a noncontributory qualified retirement plan and a separate and
independent nonqualified supplemental retirement plan for our
officers. The components of net periodic benefit costs for both plans
are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
cost
|
|
$ |
638 |
|
|
$ |
1,004 |
|
|
$ |
2,176 |
|
|
$ |
2,844 |
|
Interest
cost
|
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
2,425 |
|
|
|
1,860 |
|
Expected
return on plan assets
|
|
|
(469 |
) |
|
|
(403 |
) |
|
|
(1,420 |
) |
|
|
(1,097 |
) |
Prior
service cost
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
Recognized
(gain) loss
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
836 |
|
|
$ |
1,308 |
|
|
$ |
2,995 |
|
|
$ |
3,716 |
|
We
contributed $2.0 million to the qualified retirement plan for both the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. For the supplemental
retirement plan, $1.2 million and $2.8 million was contributed for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Currently, we
do not anticipate making any additional contributions to either plan in
2008.
We have a
Savings and Investment Plan pursuant to which eligible employees may elect to
contribute from 1% of their salaries to the maximum amount established annually
by the Internal Revenue Service. We match employee contributions at
the rate of $.50 per $1.00 for the first 6% of the employee's
salary. The employees vest in the employer contributions ratably over
a six-year period. Compensation expense related to the plan was $.2
million for both the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 and
$.7 million for both the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and
2007.
We have
an Employee Share Purchase Plan under which .6 million of our common shares of
beneficial interest have been authorized. These shares, as well as
common shares of beneficial interest purchased by us on the open market, are
made available for sale to employees at a discount of 15% from the quoted market
price on the purchase date. Shares purchased by the employee under
the plan are restricted from being sold for two years from the date of purchase
or until termination of employment. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, a total of 28,063 and 20,042 common shares of
beneficial interest were purchased for the employees at a discounted average per
share price of $29.15 and $37.00, respectively.
We also
have a deferred compensation plan for eligible employees allowing them to defer
portions of their current cash salary or share-based
compensation. Deferred amounts are deposited in a grantor trust,
which are included in other assets, and are reported as compensation expense in
the year service is rendered. Cash deferrals are invested based on
the employee’s investment selections from a mix of assets based on a “Broad
Market Diversification” model. Deferred share-based compensation
cannot be diversified, and distributions from this plan are made in the same
form as the original deferral.
Note
18. Segment
Information
The
reportable segments presented are the segments for which separate financial
information is available, and for which operating performance is evaluated
regularly by senior management in deciding how to allocate resources and in
assessing performance. We evaluate the performance of the reportable
segments based on net operating income, defined as total revenues less operating
expenses and ad valorem taxes. Management does not consider the
effect of gains or losses from the sale of property in evaluating segment
operating performance.
The
shopping center segment is engaged in the acquisition, development and
management of real estate, primarily anchored neighborhood and community
shopping centers located in Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida,
Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Missouri, Nevada, New
Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah
and Washington. The customer base includes supermarkets, discount
retailers, drugstores and other retailers who generally sell basic
necessity-type commodities. The industrial segment is engaged in the
acquisition, development and management of bulk warehouses and office/service
centers. Its properties are located in California, Florida, Georgia,
Tennessee, Texas and Virginia, and the customer base is
diverse. Included in "Other" are corporate-related items,
insignificant operations and costs that are not allocated to the reportable
segments.
Information
concerning our reportable segments is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Shopping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center
|
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
141,620 |
|
|
$ |
14,973 |
|
|
$ |
2,154 |
|
|
$ |
158,747 |
|
Net
Operating Income
|
|
|
100,351 |
|
|
|
10,564 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
111,231 |
|
Equity in Earnings (Loss) of Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships,
net
|
|
|
4,981 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
5,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
135,696 |
|
|
$ |
14,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,233 |
|
|
$ |
152,929 |
|
Net
Operating Income
|
|
|
94,799 |
|
|
|
9,498 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
105,873 |
|
Equity in Earnings of Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships,
net
|
|
|
4,572 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
4,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
416,251 |
|
|
$ |
43,239 |
|
|
$ |
6,502 |
|
|
$ |
465,992 |
|
Net
Operating Income
|
|
|
297,267 |
|
|
|
30,523 |
|
|
|
2,120 |
|
|
|
329,910 |
|
Equity in Earnings (Loss) of Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships,
net
|
|
|
14,670 |
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
15,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
388,562 |
|
|
$ |
39,536 |
|
|
$ |
7,354 |
|
|
$ |
435,452 |
|
Net
Operating Income
|
|
|
278,647 |
|
|
|
27,205 |
|
|
|
3,248 |
|
|
|
309,100 |
|
Equity in Earnings of Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships,
net
|
|
|
11,294 |
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
12,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
of September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships
|
|
$ |
265,217 |
|
|
$ |
39,189 |
|
|
$ |
4,110 |
|
|
$ |
308,516 |
|
Total
Assets
|
|
|
3,933,451 |
|
|
|
352,166 |
|
|
|
835,040 |
|
|
|
5,120,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
of December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships
|
|
$ |
261,293 |
|
|
$ |
35,103 |
|
|
$ |
4,360 |
|
|
$ |
300,756 |
|
Total
Assets
|
|
|
3,908,105 |
|
|
|
353,157 |
|
|
|
732,081 |
|
|
|
4,993,343 |
|
Net
operating income reconciles to income from continuing operations as shown on the
Condensed Statements of Consolidated Income and Comprehensive Income as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Segment Net Operating Income
|
|
$ |
111,231 |
|
|
$ |
105,873 |
|
|
$ |
329,910 |
|
|
$ |
309,100 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
(36,606 |
) |
|
|
(33,115 |
) |
|
|
(118,957 |
) |
|
|
(95,787 |
) |
General
and administrative
|
|
|
(5,816 |
) |
|
|
(6,537 |
) |
|
|
(19,774 |
) |
|
|
(19,650 |
) |
Interest
Expense
|
|
|
(38,884 |
) |
|
|
(38,470 |
) |
|
|
(112,838 |
) |
|
|
(110,183 |
) |
Interest
and Other Income
|
|
|
1,172 |
|
|
|
2,082 |
|
|
|
3,920 |
|
|
|
6,838 |
|
Equity
in Earnings of Real Estate JointVentures and Partnerships,
net
|
|
|
5,151 |
|
|
|
4,893 |
|
|
|
15,537 |
|
|
|
12,513 |
|
Income
Allocated to Minority Interests
|
|
|
(2,515 |
) |
|
|
(3,003 |
) |
|
|
(6,968 |
) |
|
|
(7,678 |
) |
Gain
(Loss) on Sale of Properties
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
986 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
3,010 |
|
Gain
on Land and Merchant Development Sales
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
4,199 |
|
|
|
8,240 |
|
|
|
8,150 |
|
Provision
for Income Taxes
|
|
|
(701 |
) |
|
|
(930 |
) |
|
|
(2,991 |
) |
|
|
(1,933 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from Continuing Operations
|
|
$ |
34,407 |
|
|
$ |
35,978 |
|
|
$ |
96,180 |
|
|
$ |
104,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
****
ITEM
2. Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking
Statements
This
quarterly report on Form 10-Q, together with other statements and information
publicly disseminated by us, contains certain forward-looking statements within
the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We
intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor
provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and include this statement for purposes of
complying with these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking
statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe our future
plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the
words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” or
similar expressions. You should not rely on forward-looking
statements since they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
factors, which are, in some cases, beyond our control and which could materially
affect actual results, performances or achievements. Factors which
may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include,
but are not limited to, (i) general economic and local real estate conditions,
(ii) the inability of major tenants to continue paying their rent obligations
due to bankruptcy, insolvency or general downturn in their business, (iii)
financing risks, such as the inability to obtain equity, debt, or other sources
of financing on favorable terms, (iv) changes in governmental laws and
regulations, (v) the level and volatility of interest rates, (vi) the
availability of suitable acquisition opportunities, (vii) changes in expected
development activity, (viii) increases in operating costs, (ix) tax matters,
including failure to qualify as a real estate investment trust, could have
adverse consequences, (x) investments through real estate joint ventures and
partnerships involve risks not present in investments in which we are the sole
investor and (xi) changes in merchant development
activity. Accordingly, there is no assurance that our expectations
will be realized.
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and the comparative summary
of selected financial data appearing elsewhere in this
report. Historical results and trends which might appear should not
be taken as indicative of future operations. Our results of
operations and financial condition, as reflected in the accompanying financial
statements and related footnotes, are subject to management's evaluation and
interpretation of business conditions, retailer performance, changing capital
market conditions and other factors which could affect the ongoing viability of
our tenants.
Executive
Overview
Weingarten
Realty Investors is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) organized under the
Texas Real Estate Investment Trust Act. We, and our predecessor
entity, began the ownership and development of shopping centers and other
commercial real estate in 1948. Our primary business is leasing space
to tenants in the shopping and industrial centers we own or lease. We
also manage centers for real estate joint ventures in which we are partners or
for other outside owners for which we charge fees.
We
operate a portfolio of rental properties which includes neighborhood and
community shopping centers and industrial properties of approximately 73.5
million square feet. We have a diversified tenant base with our
largest tenant comprising only 2.8% of total rental revenues during
2008.
We focus
on increasing funds from operations (“FFO”) and growing dividend payments to our
common shareholders. We do this through hands-on leasing, management
and selected redevelopment of the existing portfolio of properties, through
disciplined growth from selective acquisitions and new developments, through
sale of properties in our merchant development program and through the
disposition of assets that no longer meet our ownership criteria. We
do this while remaining committed to maintaining a conservative balance sheet, a
well-staggered debt maturity schedule and strong credit agency
ratings.
We
continue to maintain a strong, conservative capital structure, which provides
ready access to a variety of attractive capital sources. We carefully
balance obtaining low cost financing with minimizing exposure to interest rate
movements and matching long-term liabilities with the long-term assets acquired
or developed. The turmoil in the current capital markets has
adversely affected both the pricing and the availability of most financial
instruments. However, based on our business plan for the current
year, we believe that asset dispositions, construction loans, joint venture
relationships and existing capital resources such as our revolving credit
facilities will provide adequate capital to execute our business
plan.
At
September 30, 2008, we owned or operated under long-term leases, either directly
or through our interest in real estate joint ventures or partnerships, a total
of 375 developed income-producing properties and 34 properties under various
stages of construction and development. The total number of centers
includes 329 neighborhood and community shopping centers located in 22 states
spanning the country from coast to coast. We also owned 77 industrial
projects located in California, Florida, Georgia, Tennessee, Texas and
Virginia and three other operating properties located in Arizona and
Texas.
We also
owned interests in 20 parcels of unimproved land held for future development
that totaled approximately 23.4 million square feet.
We had
approximately 7,400 leases with 5,400 different tenants at September 30,
2008.
Leases
for our properties range from less than a year for smaller spaces to over 25
years for larger tenants. Rental revenues generally include minimum
lease payments, which often increase over the lease term, reimbursements of
property operating expenses, including ad valorem taxes, and additional rent
payments based on a percentage of the tenants' sales. The majority of
our anchor tenants are supermarkets, value-oriented apparel/discount stores and
other retailers or service providers who generally sell basic necessity-type
goods and services. Through this challenging economic environment, we
believe the stability of our anchor tenants, combined with convenient locations,
attractive and well-maintained properties, high quality retailers and a strong
tenant mix, should ensure the long-term success of our merchants and the
viability of our portfolio.
In
assessing the performance of our properties, management carefully tracks the
occupancy of the portfolio. The weakened economy contributed to a
drop in our occupancy from 95.1% at September 30, 2007 to 93.7% at September 30,
2008. While we will continue to monitor the economy and the effects
on our retailers, we believe the significant diversification of our portfolio
both geographically and by tenant base will allow us to maintain similar
occupancy levels as we move through the year. Another important
indicator of performance is the spread in rental rates on a same-space basis as
we complete new leases and renew existing leases. We completed 913
new leases or renewals during the first nine months of 2008 totaling 4.8 million
square feet, increasing rental rates an average of 11.6% on a cash
basis.
New
Development
At
September 30, 2008, we had 30 properties in various stages of development
including those in our merchant development program. We have invested $390
million to date on these projects and, at completion, we estimate our total
investment to be $542 million. These properties are slated to open over
the next one to three years with a projected return on investment of
approximately 8.6% when completed. Also, four additional properties
have been stabilized during the first nine months of 2008 with an estimated
total investment of $70.8 million and a project return on investment of
approximately 9.0%.
As of
September 30, 2008, we have seven properties that are held for future
development pending improvement in economic conditions. In addition
to these projects, we have a development pipeline with three development sites
under contract, which will represent a projected investment of approximately
$21.2 million. Due to current economic factors, obtaining new
projects this year has proven challenging as potential retail anchors are
delaying or halting their expansion plans due to the deterioration of the
economy. We continue to seek opportunities and monitor this market
closely.
Merchant
development is a program where we acquire or develop a project with the
objective of selling all or part of it, instead of retaining it in our portfolio
on a long-term basis. Also, disposition of land parcels are included
in this program. We generated gains of approximately $8.2 million
from this program during the first nine months of 2008. Although this
market has been slowing due to the credit crisis, we expect to generate
additional gains through the remainder of the year.
Acquisitions and Joint
Ventures
Acquisitions
are a key component of our strategy. However, the turmoil in the credit
markets has significantly reduced transactions in the marketplace and,
therefore, created uncertainty with respect to pricing. Partnering
with institutional investors through real estate joint ventures enables us to
acquire high quality assets in our target markets while also meeting our
financial return objectives. We benefit from access to lower-cost
capital, as well as leveraging our expertise to provide fee-based services, such
as asset management and the acquisition, leasing and management of properties,
to the joint ventures.
During
the first nine months of 2008, we have acquired one shopping center and invested
in a 25%-owned unconsolidated joint venture to acquire a 4,000 square foot pad
building located in Florida for a purchase price of approximately $2.7
million.
In March
2008, we contributed 18 neighborhood/community shopping centers located in Texas
with an aggregate value of approximately $227.5 million, and aggregating more
than 2.1 million square feet, to a joint venture. We sold an 85%
interest in this joint venture to AEW Capital Management on behalf of one of its
institutional clients. Financing totaling $154.3 million was placed on the
properties and guaranteed by us.
In August
2008, we executed a real estate limited partnership with a foreign institutional
investor to purchase up to $250 million of retail properties in various states,
of which our capital commitment is $17.6 million that will be funded as
properties are acquired, but no later than June 30, 2011. Our
ownership in this unconsolidated real estate limited partnership is
20.1%. As of September 30, 2008, no properties have been
purchased.
On
October 1, 2008, we signed a letter of intent with an institutional investor
pursuant to which we intend to contribute 12 of our supermarket-anchored
shopping centers, with an agreed upon value of approximately $271.4 million, to
a joint venture in which such institutional investor will purchase a 70%
interest, and we will hold 30% interest. Consummation of the
transaction contemplated by the letter of intent is subject to negotiation of
definitive documentation, customary closing conditions, and no assurance can be
given that the transaction will, in fact, be consummated.
Joint
venture fee income for the first nine months of 2008 was approximately $5.2
million or a decrease of $.5 million over the prior year. This
decrease is a result of reduced transactions in the marketplace due to the
turmoil in the credit markets.
Dispositions
During
the first nine months of 2008, we sold eight shopping centers and one industrial
center for $113.8 million. Although lenders for prospective acquirers
have tightened their underwriting criteria, we expect to continue to dispose of
certain properties during the year as opportunities present
themselves. Dispositions are part of an ongoing portfolio management
process where we prune our portfolio of properties that do not meet our
geographic or growth targets and provide capital to recycle into properties that
have barrier-to-entry locations within high growth metropolitan
markets. Over time, we expect this to produce a stronger portfolio
with higher occupancy rates and internal revenue growth.
Summary
of Critical Accounting Policies
Our
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is
based on our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. The preparation of these financial
statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities and contingencies as of the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. We evaluate our assumptions and estimates on an
ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from
other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
A
disclosure of our critical accounting policies is included in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 in Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition. There have been no significant
changes to our policies during 2008.
Results
of Operations
Comparison
of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 to the Three Months Ended September
30, 2007
Revenues
Total
revenues were $158.7 million in the third quarter of 2008 versus $152.9 million
in the third quarter of 2007, an increase of $5.8 million or
3.8%. This increase resulted from an increase in rental revenues of
$6.0 million and a decrease of other income of $.2 million.
Property
acquisitions and new development activity contributed $5.4 million of the rental
income increase with $.6 million resulting from 306 renewals and new leases,
comprising 1.5 million square feet at an average rental rate increase of
9.9%.
Occupancy
(leased space) of the portfolio as compared to the prior year was as
follows:
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shopping
Centers
|
|
|
94.5 |
% |
|
|
95.2 |
% |
Industrial
|
|
|
91.4 |
% |
|
|
94.5 |
% |
Total
Portfolio
|
|
|
93.7 |
% |
|
|
95.1 |
% |
Expenses
Total
expenses for the third quarter of 2008 were $89.9 million versus $86.7 million
in the third quarter of 2007, an increase of $3.2 million or
3.7%. This increase resulted primarily from increases in depreciation
and amortization expense and insurance expense of $3.5 million and $1.0 million,
respectively. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense
is a result of our acquisition and new development activities while the increase
in insurance expenses is associated with Hurricane Ike. Offsetting
this $4.5 million increase is a reduction in general and administrative and
operating expenses associated with a reduction in headcount. Overall,
direct operating costs and expenses (operating and ad valorem taxes) of
operating our properties as a percentage of rental revenues were 30.8% and 31.7%
in 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Interest
Expense
Interest
expense totaled $38.9 million for the third quarter of 2008, up $.4 million or
1.1% from the third quarter of 2007. The components of interest
expense were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
interest expense
|
|
$ |
45,385 |
|
|
$ |
46,688 |
|
Over-market
mortgage adjustment of acquired properties
|
|
|
(1,265 |
) |
|
|
(1,553 |
) |
Capitalized
interest
|
|
|
(5,236 |
) |
|
|
(6,665 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
38,884 |
|
|
$ |
38,470 |
|
Gross
interest expense totaled $45.4 million in the third quarter of 2008, down $1.3
million or 2.8% from the third quarter of 2007. The decrease in gross
interest expense was due primarily to a decrease in the weighted average rates
for the respective periods. For the third quarter of 2008, the
weighted average debt outstanding was $3.2 billion at weighted average interest
rate of 5.4% in 2008 as compared to $3.1 billion outstanding at a weighted
average rate of 5.8% in 2007. Capitalized interest decreased $1.4
million due to a decrease in the annualized average interest capitalization rate
of 5.8% in 2008 compared to 9.3% in 2007.
Interest
and Other Income
Interest
and other income for the third quarter of 2008 was $1.2 million versus $2.1
million in the third quarter of 2007, a decrease of $.9 million or
42.9%. This decrease resulted from the fair value decline in the
assets held in a grantor trust related to our deferred compensation
plan. Offsetting this $1.6 million decrease is the interest earned on
notes receivable from real estate joint ventures and partnerships for new
development activities and other receivables..
Gain
on Land and Merchant Development Sales
Gain on
land and merchant development sales of $1.4 million in the third quarter of 2008
resulted primarily from the sale of six land parcels. The gain in the
third quarter of 2007 resulted primarily from the sale of four land parcels and
a shopping center in Arizona.
Income
from Discontinued Operations
Income
from discontinued operations was $4.6 million in the third quarter of 2008
versus $8.3 million in the third quarter of 2007, a decrease of $3.7 million or
44.6%. This decrease was due primarily to the gain on sale of two
properties in 2008 as compared to the gain on sale for four properties during
the same period of 2007. Also, the decrease in operating income from
discontinued operations results primarily from the disposition of an additional
six properties in 2007.
Results
of Operations
Comparison
of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 to the Nine Months Ended September
30, 2007
Revenues
Total
revenues were $466.0 million in the first nine months of 2008 versus $435.5
million in the first nine months of 2007, an increase of $30.5 million or
7.0%. This increase resulted from an increase in rental revenues of
$29.8 million and other income of $.7 million.
Property
acquisitions and new development activity contributed $25.4 million of the
rental income increase with $4.4 million resulting from 913 renewals and new
leases, comprising 4.8 million square feet at an average rental rate increase of
11.6%.
Occupancy
(leased space) of the portfolio as compared to the prior year was as
follows:
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shopping
Centers
|
|
|
94.5 |
% |
|
|
95.2 |
% |
Industrial
|
|
|
91.4 |
% |
|
|
94.5 |
% |
Total
|
|
|
93.7 |
% |
|
|
95.1 |
% |
Expenses
Total
expenses for the first nine months of 2008 were $274.8 million versus $241.8
million in the first nine months of 2007, an increase of $33.0 million or
13.6%.
The
increases in 2008 for depreciation and amortization expense ($23.2 million),
operating expenses ($5.4 million), ad valorem taxes ($4.3 million) and general
and administrative expenses ($.1 million) were primarily a result of the
properties acquired and developed during the year. In addition,
insurance expenses increased as a result of the Hurricane Ike in 2008 and
depreciation expense increased as a result of redevelopment
activities. Overall, direct operating costs and expenses (operating
and ad valorem tax expense) of operating our properties as a percentage of
rental revenues were 29.9% and 29.7% in 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Interest
Expense
Interest
expense totaled $112.8 million for the first nine months of 2008, up $2.7
million or 2.4% from the first nine months of 2007. The components of
interest expense were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
interest expense
|
|
$ |
132,755 |
|
|
$ |
134,496 |
|
Over-market
mortgage adjustment of acquired properties
|
|
|
(4,541 |
) |
|
|
(5,157 |
) |
Capitalized
interest
|
|
|
(15,376 |
) |
|
|
(19,156 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
112,838 |
|
|
$ |
110,183 |
|
Gross
interest expense totaled $132.8 million in the first nine months of 2008, down
$1.7 million from the first nine months of 2007. The decrease in
gross interest expense results primarily from a net gain from a rate swap
termination in March 2008. The decrease in capitalized interest of
$3.8 million results from the decrease in the annualized average interest
capitalization rate of 5.8% in 2008 compared to 8.5% in 2007.
Interest
and Other Income
Interest
and other income was $3.9 million in the first nine months of 2008 versus $6.8
million in the first nine months of 2007, a decrease of $2.9 million or 42.6%.
This decrease resulted from the fair value decline in the assets held in a
grantor trust related to our deferred compensation plan and a reduction in
interest earned from a qualified escrow account. Offsetting this $5.2
million decrease is the interest earned on notes receivable from real estate
joint ventures and partnerships for new development activities and other
receivables.
Equity
in Earnings of Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships, net
Our
equity in earnings of joint ventures was $15.5 million in the first nine months
of 2008 versus $12.5 million in the first nine months of 2007, an increase of
$3.0 million or 24.0%. The increase was attributable primarily to our
incremental income from our investments in newly formed joint ventures for the
acquisition and development of retail and industrial
properties.
Gain
on Sale of Properties
Gain on
sale of properties was $.1 million in the first nine months of 2008 versus $3.0
million in the first nine months of 2007, a decrease of $2.9 million or
96.7%. The gain in 2007 resulted primarily from gain deferrals and
adjustments in 2007 that did not recur in 2008.
Income
from Discontinued Operations
Income
from discontinued operations was $56.3 million in the first nine months of 2008
versus $67.0 million in the first nine months of 2007, a decrease of $10.7
million or 16.0%. This decrease was due primarily to the gain on sale
of nine properties in 2008 as compared to the gain on sale for 12 properties
during the same period of 2007. Also, the decrease in operating
income from discontinued operations results primarily from the disposition of an
additional six properties in 2007.
Effects
of Inflation
We have
structured our leases in such a way as to remain largely unaffected should
significant inflation occur. Most of the leases contain percentage
rent provisions whereby we receive increased rentals based on the tenants' gross
sales. Many leases provide for increasing minimum rentals during the
terms of the leases through escalation provisions. In addition, many
of our leases are for terms of less than 10 years, which allow us to adjust
rental rates to changing market conditions when the leases
expire. Most of our leases also require the tenants to pay their
proportionate share of operating expenses and ad valorem taxes. As a
result of these lease provisions, increases due to inflation, as well as ad
valorem tax rate increases, generally do not have a significant adverse effect
upon our operating results because they are absorbed by our
tenants.
Capital
Resources and Liquidity
Our
primary liquidity needs are payment of our common and preferred dividends,
maintaining and operating our existing properties, payment of our debt service
costs and funding planned growth. We anticipate that cash flows from
operating activities will continue to provide adequate capital for all common
and preferred dividend payments and debt service costs, as well as the capital
necessary to maintain and operate our existing properties. The
current credit market turmoil has significantly affected our current ability to
obtain additional capital; however, we have been able to complete some
transactions and do not believe this will severely impact the execution of our
business plan. We currently anticipate that our available cash
resources and credit will be sufficient to meet our anticipated working capital
and new development program expenditure requirements for at least the next 12
months. If market conditions continue to deteriorate, we have the
ability to delay the funding of certain new development
outlays. Also, we may need to raise additional funds in order to
support more rapid expansion, develop or acquire new properties, respond to
competitive pressures, or take advantage of unanticipated
opportunities. Our most restrictive debt covenants limit the amount
of additional leverage we can add; however, we believe the sources of capital
described above are adequate to execute our current business plan and remain in
compliance with our debt covenants.
Primary
sources of capital for funding our acquisitions and new development programs are
our revolving credit facilities, cash generated from sale of properties and
notes receivable from real estate joint ventures and partnerships for new
development activities, transactions with venture partners, cash flow generated
by our operating properties and proceeds from capital issuances as
needed. Amounts outstanding under the revolving credit agreement are
retired as needed with proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, common and
preferred equity, cash generated from disposition of properties and cash flow
generated by our operating properties. As of September 30,
2008, the balance outstanding under our $575 million revolving credit
facility was $483.0 million, and no amount was outstanding under our $30
million credit facility, which we use for cash management
purposes. In October 2008, we issued 3.0 million common shares of
beneficial interest at $34.20 per share. Net proceeds from this
offering were $98.2 million and were used to repay indebtedness outstanding
under our revolving credit facilities.
Our
capital structure also includes non-recourse secured debt that we assume in
conjunction with our acquisitions program. We also have non-recourse
debt secured by acquired or developed properties held in several of our real
estate joint ventures and partnerships. We hedge the future cash
flows of certain debt transactions, as well as changes in the fair value of our
debt instruments, principally through interest rate swaps with major financial
institutions. We generally have the right to sell or otherwise
dispose of our assets except in certain cases where we are required to obtain
our joint venture partners’ consent or a third party consent for assets held in
special purpose entities, which are 100% owned by us.
Investing
Activities:
Acquisitions
and Joint Ventures
Retail
Properties.
In
January 2008, we acquired a 4,000 square foot pad building located in Florida
through a 25%-owned unconsolidated joint venture.
In March
2008, we contributed 18 neighborhood/community shopping centers located in Texas
with an aggregate value of approximately $227.5 million, and aggregating more
than 2.1 million square feet, to a joint venture. We sold an 85% interest
in this joint venture to AEW Capital Management on behalf of one of its
institutional clients and received proceeds approximating $216.1
million. We maintain a 15% ownership interest in this
venture, which is consolidated in our financial statements.
In May
2008, we acquired Kirby Strip Center, a 10,000 square foot building
located in Texas.
In August
2008, we executed a real estate limited partnership with a foreign institutional
investor to purchase up to $250 million of retail properties in various states,
of which our capital commitment is $17.6 million that will be funded as
properties are acquired, but no later than June 30, 2011. Our
ownership in this unconsolidated real estate limited partnership is
20.1%. As of September 30, 2008, no properties have been
purchased.
On
October 1, 2008, we signed a letter of intent with an institutional investor
pursuant to which we intend to contribute 12 of our supermarket-anchored
shopping centers, with an agreed upon value of approximately $271.4 million, to
a joint venture in which such institutional investor will purchase a 70%
interest, and we will hold 30% interest. Consummation of the
transaction contemplated by the letter of intent is subject to negotiation of
definitive documentation, customary closing conditions, and no assurance can be
given that the transaction will, in fact, be consummated.
Industrial Properties.
There
were no acquisitions of industrial properties during the first nine months of
2008.
Dispositions
Retail
Properties.
During
2008, we sold eight shopping centers, of which five each are located in Texas,
one in California and two in Louisiana. Sales proceeds from these
dispositions totaled $108.2 million and generated gains of $51.6
million.
Industrial
Properties.
During
2008, we sold one industrial center located in Texas. Sales proceed
from this disposition totaling $5.6 million and generated a gain of $2.4
million.
New
Development and Capital Expenditures
At
September 30, 2008, we had 30 projects under construction or in preconstruction
stages with a total square footage of approximately 7.8
million. These properties are slated to be completed over the next
one to three years.
Merchant
Development Properties.
During
the first nine months of 2008, we sold 21 parcels of land located in Arizona,
Colorado, Florida, Nevada, North Carolina and Texas, which generated gains of
$8.2 million. In an unconsolidated real estate joint venture and
partnership, two land parcels were sold in Colorado and
Washington. Our share of the sales proceeds and the gain generated
totaled $.7 million and $.4 million, respectively.
Our new
development projects are financed initially under our revolving credit
facilities, using available cash generated from dispositions of properties, cash
flow generated by our operating properties or proceeds from notes receivable
from real estate joint venture and partnerships for new development
activities.
Capital
expenditures for additions to the existing portfolio, acquisitions, new
development and our share of investments in unconsolidated real estate joint
ventures totaled $331.5 million and $863.2 million for the nine months of
2008 and 2007, respectively. We expect to invest $152.5 million,
of which $76.8 million is contractually committed, to complete construction of
properties under various stages of development over the next one to three
years. We also expect to invest $4.5 million to acquire projects in the
remainder of 2008 and $17.6 million by 2011.
Financing
Activities:
Debt
Total
debt outstanding increased from $3.2 billion at December 31, 2007 to $3.3
billion at September 30, 2008. Total debt at September 30, 2008
included $2.8 billion of which interest rates are fixed and $549.4 million that
bears interest at variable rates, after adjusting for the net effect of $50
million of interest rate swaps. Additionally, debt totaling $1.0
billion was secured by operating properties while the remaining $2.3 billion was
unsecured.
We have a
$575 million unsecured revolving credit facility held by a syndicate of
banks. This unsecured revolving facility expires in February 2010 and
provides a one year extension option available at our
request. Borrowing rates under this facility float at a margin over
LIBOR, plus a facility fee. The borrowing margin and facility fee,
which are currently 42.5 and 15.0 basis points, respectively, are priced off a
grid that is tied to our senior unsecured credit rating. This
facility includes a competitive bid feature where we are allowed to request bids
for borrowings up to $287.5 million from the syndicate banks. As of
October 31, 2008, there was $410.0 million outstanding under this
facility. We also maintain a $30 million unsecured and uncommitted
overnight facility that is used for cash management purposes, and as of October
31, 2008, there was no outstanding balance under this facility. The
available balance under our revolving credit agreement was $154.8 million at
October 31, 2008, which is reduced by amounts outstanding for letters of credit
and our overnight facility. We believe we were in full compliance
with the covenants of our unsecured revolving credit facilities as of September
30, 2008.
On March
20, 2008, we contributed assets to a joint venture with an institutional
investor. In conjunction with this transaction, the joint venture
issued $154.3 million of fixed-rate long-term debt with an average life of 7.3
years at an average rate of 5.4% that we guaranteed. We received all
of the proceeds from the issuance of this debt and such proceeds were used to
reduce amounts outstanding under our $575 million revolving credit
facility.
In
January 2008, we elected to repay at par a fixed-rate 8.33% mortgage totaling
$121.8 million that was secured by 19 supermarket-anchored shopping centers in
California originally acquired in April 2001.
As of
December 31, 2007, the balance of secured debt that was assumed in conjunction
with 2007 acquisitions was $99.4 million. A capital lease obligation
totaling $12.9 million was assumed and subsequently settled in
2007.
At
September 30, 2008, we had two interest rate swap contracts designated as fair
value hedges with an aggregate notional amount of $50.0 million that convert
fixed interest payments at rates of 4.2% to variable interest
payments. We could be exposed to losses in the event of
nonperformance by the counter-parties; however, management believes the
likelihood of such nonperformance is unlikely.
At
December 31, 2007, we had two forward-starting interest rate swap contracts with
an aggregate notional amount of $118.6 million to mitigate the risk of future
fluctuations in interest rates on forecasted issuances of long-term
debt. These contracts were settled approximately one week after we
contributed assets to a joint venture with an institutional investor and
concurrently issued $154.3 million of fixed-rate long-term debt that we
guaranteed.
Equity
Common
and preferred dividends increased to $160.0 million in the first nine months of
2008, compared to $144.2 million for the first nine months of
2007. The quarterly dividend rate for our common shares of beneficial
interest increased to $.525 in 2008 compared to $.495 for the same period of
2007. Our dividend payout ratio on common equity for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 approximated 68.0% and 63.7%, respectively,
based on basic funds from operations for the respective periods.
In June
and July of 2008, we redeemed $120 million and $80 million of depositary shares,
respectively, retiring all of the Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Shares. Each depositary share represented one-hundredth of a Series G
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Share. These depositary shares were
redeemed, at our option, at a redemption price of $25 multiplied by a graded
rate per depositary share based on the date of redemption plus any accrued and
unpaid dividends thereon. Upon the redemption of these shares, the related
original issuance costs of $1.9 million were reported as a deduction in arriving
at net income available to common shareholders. In September 2007,
these depositary shares were issued through a private placement, and net
proceeds of $193.6 million were used to repay amounts outstanding under our
credit facilities. The Series G Preferred Shares paid a variable-rate
quarterly dividend through July 2008 and had a liquidation preference of $2,500
per share. The variable-rate dividend was calculated on the period’s
three-month LIBOR rate plus a percentage determined by the number of days
outstanding.
We issued
$150 million and $200 million of depositary shares on June 6, 2008 and January
30, 2007, respectively. Each depositary share represents
one-hundredth of a Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Share. The depositary shares are redeemable, in whole or in part, on
or after January 30, 2012 at our option, at a redemption price of $25 per
depositary share, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon. The
depositary shares are not convertible or exchangeable for any of our other
property or securities. The Series F Preferred Shares pay a 6.5%
annual dividend and have a liquidation value of $2,500 per
share. Series F Preferred Shares issued in June 2008 were issued at a
discount, resulting in an effective rate of 8.25%. Net proceeds of
$118.1 million and $194.0 million in June 2008 and January 2007, respectively,
were used to repay amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facilities and
for general business purposes. Subsequent to the 2008 issuance, our
revolving credit facilities were used to finance the partial redemption of the
Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares as described above.
In July
2007, our Board of Trust Managers authorized a common share repurchase
program as part of our ongoing investment strategy. Under the terms
of the program, we may purchase up to a maximum value of $300 million of our
common shares of beneficial interest during the next two years. Share
repurchases may be made in the open market or in privately negotiated
transactions at the discretion of management and as market conditions
warrant. We anticipate funding the repurchase of shares primarily
through the proceeds received from our property disposition program, as well as
from general corporate funds.
During
2007, we repurchased 2.8 million common shares of beneficial interest at an
average share price of $37.12 and cancelled 1.4 million common shares of
beneficial interest in both 2008 and 2007. As of September 30, 2008,
the remaining value of common shares of beneficial interest available to be
repurchased is $196.7 million.
In
October 2008, we issued 3.0 million common shares of beneficial interest at
$34.20 per share. Net proceeds from this offering were $98.2 million
and were used to repay indebtedness outstanding under our revolving credit
facilities and for other general corporate purposes.
In
September 2004, the SEC declared effective two additional shelf registration
statements totaling $1.55 billion, of which $1.1 billion was available as of
October 31, 2008. In addition, we have $85.4 million available as of
October 31, 2008 under our $1 billion shelf registration statement, which
became effective in April 2003. These shelf registrations will expire
at December 31, 2008. We will continue to closely monitor both the
debt and equity markets and carefully consider our available financing
alternatives, including both public and private placements.
Contractual
Obligations
We have
debt obligations related to our mortgage loans and unsecured debt, including our
credit facilities. We have shopping centers that are subject to
non-cancelable long-term ground leases where a third party owns and has leased
the underlying land to us to construct and/or operate a shopping
center. In addition, we have non-cancelable operating leases
pertaining to office space from which we conduct our business. The
table below excludes obligations related to our new development
projects. We have entered into commitments aggregating $76.8 million
comprised principally of construction contracts which are generally due in 12 to
36 months. The following table summarizes our primary contractual
obligations as of September 30, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Mortgages
and Notes Payable:
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured
Debt (2)
|
|
$ |
35,440 |
|
|
$ |
124,469 |
|
|
$ |
633,212 |
|
|
$ |
295,349 |
|
|
$ |
265,216 |
|
|
$ |
1,683,980 |
|
|
$ |
3,037,666 |
|
Secured
Debt
|
|
|
43,944 |
|
|
|
123,162 |
|
|
|
124,252 |
|
|
|
150,936 |
|
|
|
177,272 |
|
|
|
717,278 |
|
|
|
1,336,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ground
Lease Payments
|
|
|
777 |
|
|
|
3,114 |
|
|
|
3,073 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
2,858 |
|
|
|
114,489 |
|
|
|
127,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations
to Acquire Projects
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Contractual Obligations
|
|
$ |
84,661 |
|
|
$ |
250,745 |
|
|
$ |
760,537 |
|
|
$ |
466,873 |
|
|
$ |
445,346 |
|
|
$ |
2,515,747 |
|
|
$ |
4,523,909 |
|
____________________
(1) Includes
principal and interest with interest on variable-rate debt calculated using
rates at September 30, 2008 excluding the effect of interest rate
swaps.
(2) Unsecured
debt in 2010 includes the maturity of our revolving credit facility of $483.0
million, of which we have the option to extend the facility for a one-year
period.
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, none of our off-balance sheet
arrangements had a material effect on our liquidity or availability of, or
requirement for, our capital resources. Letters of credit totaling
$10.2 million and $9.2 million were outstanding under the revolving credit
facility at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively.
Related
to our investment in a redevelopment project in Sheridan, Colorado that is held
in an unconsolidated real estate joint venture, we, our joint venture partner
and the joint venture have each provided a guarantee for the payment of any
annual sinking fund requirement shortfalls on bonds issued in connection with
the project. The Sheridan Redevelopment Agency issued $97 million of
Series A bonds used for an urban renewal project. The bonds are to be
repaid with incremental sales and property taxes and a public improvement fee
(“PIF”) to be assessed on future retail sales. The incremental taxes
and PIF are to remain intact until the bond liability has been paid in full,
including any amounts we may have to provide. We have evaluated and
determined that the fair value of the guarantee is nominal. However,
due to the guarantee, a liability has been recorded by the joint venture equal
to amounts funded under the bonds.
In July
2008, a 47.75%-owned unconsolidated real estate joint venture (“WMB”)
acquired an 83.34% interest (“WMMDHB”) in a 919,000 square foot new development
to be constructed in Aurora, Colorado. WMB provided a guarantee on
debt obtained by WMMDHB. WMB’s maximum exposure to loss is limited to
the guarantee of the debt, which was approximately $15.6 million at September
30, 2008. We have evaluated and determined that the fair value of the
guarantee is nominal.
In August
2008, we executed a real estate limited partnership with a foreign institutional
investor to purchase up to $250 million of retail properties in various states,
of which our capital commitment is $17.6 million that will be funded as
properties are acquired, but no later than June 30, 2011. Our
ownership in this unconsolidated real estate limited partnership is
20.1%. As of September 30, 2008, no properties have been
purchased.
Funds
from Operations
The
National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) defines FFO as
net income (loss) available to common shareholders computed in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, excluding gains or losses from sales
of operating real estate assets and extraordinary items, plus depreciation and
amortization of operating properties, including our share of unconsolidated real
estate joint ventures and partnerships. We calculate FFO in a manner
consistent with the NAREIT definition.
Management
uses FFO as a supplemental measure to conduct and evaluate our business because
there are certain limitations associated with using GAAP net income by itself as
the primary measure of our operating performance. Historical cost
accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes
that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over
time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen or
fallen with market conditions, management believes that the presentation of
operating results for real estate companies that uses historical cost accounting
is insufficient by itself. There can be no assurance that FFO
presented by us is comparable to similarly titled measures of other
REITs.
FFO
should not be considered as an alternative to net income or other measurements
under GAAP as an indicator of our operating performance or to cash flows from
operating, investing or financing activities as a measure of
liquidity. FFO does not reflect working capital changes, cash
expenditures for capital improvements or principal payments on
indebtedness.
Funds
from operations is calculated as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income available to common shareholders
|
|
$ |
29,053 |
|
|
$ |
38,281 |
|
|
$ |
124,828 |
|
|
$ |
154,940 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
34,282 |
|
|
|
33,142 |
|
|
|
114,535 |
|
|
|
97,023 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization of unconsolidated real estate joint ventures and
partnerships
|
|
|
3,137 |
|
|
|
2,846 |
|
|
|
8,698 |
|
|
|
7,439 |
|
Gain
on sale of properties
|
|
|
(4,470 |
) |
|
|
(5,644 |
) |
|
|
(53,437 |
) |
|
|
(58,842 |
) |
(Gain)
loss on sale of properties of unconsolidated real estate joint
ventures and partnerships
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
Funds
from operations
|
|
|
62,004 |
|
|
|
68,627 |
|
|
|
194,612 |
|
|
|
200,562 |
|
Funds
from operations attributable to operating partnership
units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds
from operations assuming conversion of OP units
|
|
$ |
62,004 |
|
|
$ |
68,627 |
|
|
$ |
194,612 |
|
|
$ |
203,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding - basic
|
|
|
83,795 |
|
|
|
85,470 |
|
|
|
83,739 |
|
|
|
85,914 |
|
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share
options and awards
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
Operating
partnership units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding - diluted
|
|
|
84,316 |
|
|
|
86,464 |
|
|
|
84,288 |
|
|
|
89,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Newly
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 (“SFAS 157”), “Fair Value
Measurements.” This statement defines fair value and establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles
and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The key
changes to current practice are (1) the definition of fair value, which focuses
on an exit price rather than an entry price; (2) the methods used to measure
fair value, such as emphasis that fair value is a market-based measurement, not
an entity-specific measurement, as well as the inclusion of an adjustment for
risk, restrictions and credit standing and (3) the expanded disclosures about
fair value measurements. This statement does not require any new fair
value measurements.
We
adopted SFAS 157 in the first quarter of 2008 regarding our financial assets and
liabilities currently recorded or disclosed at fair value. The FASB
has issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement
No. 157” which defers the provisions of SFAS 157 relating to nonfinancial assets
and liabilities, and delays implementation by us until January 1,
2009. SFAS 157 has not and is not expected to materially affect how
we determine fair value, but it has resulted in certain additional disclosures
(see Note 15).
In
October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-3, “Determining
the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not
Active,” to clarify the provisions of SFAS 157 relating to valuing a financial
asset when the market for that asset is not active. This FSP was effective
upon issuance and has not had a material effect on our consolidated financial
statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158 (“SFAS 158”), “Employers’
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – An
Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132R.” This new
standard requires an employer to: (a) recognize in its statement of financial
position an asset for a plan’s overfunded status or a liability for a plan’s
underfunded status; (b) measure a plan’s assets and its obligations that
determine its funded status as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year (with
limited exceptions); and (c) recognize changes in the funded status of a defined
benefit postretirement plan in the year in which the changes
occur. These changes will be reported in comprehensive
income. The requirement to measure plan assets and benefit
obligations as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end statement of
financial position (the “Measurement Provision”) is effective for us on December
31, 2008. We have assessed the potential impact of the Measurement
Provision of SFAS 158 and concluded that its adoption will not have a material
effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 (“SFAS 159”), “The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” SFAS 159 expands
opportunities to use fair value measurement in financial reporting and permits
entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items
at fair value. This statement was effective for us on January 1,
2008, and we have elected not to measure any of our current eligible financial
assets or liabilities at fair value upon adoption; however, we do have the
option to elect to measure eligible financial assets or liabilities acquired in
the future at fair value.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) (“SFAS 141R”), “Business
Combinations.” SFAS 141R expands the original guidance’s definition
of a business. It broadens the fair value measurement and recognition
to all assets acquired, liabilities assumed and interests transferred as a
result of business combinations. SFAS 141R requires expanded
disclosures to improve the ability to evaluate the nature and financial effects
of business combinations. SFAS 141R is effective for us for business
combinations made on or after January 1, 2009. While we have not
formally quantified the effect, we expect the adoption of SFAS 141R to have a
material effect on our accounting for future acquisition of
properties.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 (“SFAS 160”), “Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No.
51.” SFAS 160 requires that a noncontrolling interest in an
unconsolidated entity be reported as equity and any losses in excess of an
unconsolidated entity’s equity interest be recorded to the noncontrolling
interest. The statement requires fair value measurement of any
noncontrolling equity investment retained in a deconsolidation. SFAS
160 is effective for us on January 1, 2009 and many provisions will be applied
retrospectively. We are currently evaluating the impact SFAS 160 will
have on our consolidated financial statements.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 (“SFAS 161”), “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No.
133.” SFAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s
derivative and hedging activities. SFAS 161 is effective for us as
amended by FASB Staff Position No. FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4 (see below) on
December 31, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact SFAS 161
will have to the disclosures included in our consolidated financial
statements.
In April
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 142-3 (“FSP FAS 142-3”),
“Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets.” FSP FAS
142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal and
extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair
value of assets considered in a business combination. FSP FAS 142-3
is effective for us on January 1, 2009. We are currently evaluating
the impact FSP FAS 142-3 will have on our consolidated financial
statements.
In May
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-1 (“FSP APB 14-1”),
“Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon
Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement).” FSP APB 14-1 will
require that the initial debt proceeds from the sale of our convertible and
exchangeable senior debentures be allocated between a liability component and an
equity component in a manner that will reflect our effective nonconvertible
borrowing rate. The resulting debt discount would be amortized using
the effective interest method over the period the debt is expected to be
outstanding as additional interest expense. FSP APB 14-1 is effective
for us on January 1, 2009 and requires retroactive application. Upon
the adoption of FSP APB 14-1, we estimate the unamortized debt discount (as of
September 30, 2008) to be approximately $25.2 million to be included as a
reduction of debt and approximately $43.5 million as accumulated additional
paid-in capital on our consolidated balance sheet. We estimate
incremental interest expense to be approximately $7.7 million for the first nine
months of 2008 and $7.9 million and $3.2 million for the years ended December
31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162 (“SFAS 162”), “The Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles.” SFAS 162 identifies the sources of
accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used
in presenting financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States. SFAS 162 is effective for
us on November 15, 2008. We believe that the adoption of this
standard on its effective date will not have a material effect on our
consolidated financial statements.
In June
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1(“FSP EITF 03-6-1”),
“Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are
Participating Securities.” FSP EITF 03-6-1 considers unvested
share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) as participating
securities. These participating securities shall be included in the
computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method under FASB
Statement No. 128. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for us on January 1,
2009. All prior-period earnings per share data presented shall be
adjusted retrospectively. We are currently evaluating the impact FSP
EITF 03-6-1 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In
September 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4
(“FSP FAS 133-1”), “Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees:
An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and
Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161.” FSP
FAS 133-1 requires disclosures by sellers of credit derivatives; additional
disclosures on current status of payment/performance risk of guarantees and
clarified the effective date of SFAS 161. FSP FAS 133-1 is effective for
us on December 31, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact FSP FAS
133-1 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
ITEM
3. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk
We use
fixed and floating-rate debt to finance our capital
requirements. These transactions expose us to market risk related to
changes in interest rates. Derivative financial instruments are used
to manage a portion of this risk, primarily interest rate swap agreements with
major financial institutions. These swap agreements expose us to
credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the counter-parties to the
swaps. We do not engage in the trading of derivative financial
instruments in the normal course of business. At September 30, 2008,
we had fixed-rate debt of $2.8 billion and variable-rate debt of $549.4 million,
after adjusting for the net effect of $50 million notional amount of interest
rate swaps. At December 31, 2007, we had fixed-rate debt of $2.8
billion and variable-rate debt of $321.7 million, after adjusting for the net
effect of $50 million notional amount of interest rate
swaps.
ITEM
4. Controls and
Procedures
Under the
supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, management has evaluated the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of
September 30, 2008. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive
officer and our principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2008.
There has
been no change to our internal control over financial reporting during the
quarter ended September 30, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART
II-OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. Legal Proceedings
We are
involved in various matters of litigation arising in the normal course of
business. While we are unable to predict with certainty the amounts
involved, our management and counsel believe that when such litigation is
resolved, our resulting liability, if any, will not have a material adverse
effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
ITEM
1A. Risk Factors
Our
merchant development program could affect our operating results.
Through
our merchant development program, we develop primarily neighborhood and
community shopping centers, with the objective of selling the properties (or
interests therein) to third parties, as opposed to retaining the properties in
our portfolio on a long-term basis. Due to the inherent uncertainty
associated with our merchant development program, our operating results and
financial indicators, such as funds from operations (“FFO”), will fluctuate from
time to time. Accordingly, fluctuations in the results of our
merchant development program could cause us to be unable to meet, or to exceed,
our publicly disclosed financial performance outlook, as well as FFO per share
estimates of security analysts for any given period. Our expectations
with respect to sales in our merchant development program are based on currently
available information, and no assurance can be given regarding the timing, terms
or consummation of any sale. Failure to meet our publicly disclosed
financial performance outlook or security analyst estimates could have a
material adverse effect on the trading price of our common shares of beneficial
interest.
We have
no other material changes to the risk factors discussed in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
ITEM
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity
Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
ITEM
3. Defaults Upon Senior
Securities
None.
ITEM
4. Submission of Matters to a
Vote of Shareholders
None.
ITEM
5. Other Information
Not
applicable.
ITEM
6. Exhibits
The
exhibits required by this item are set forth on the Exhibit Index attached
hereto.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
WEINGARTEN
REALTY INVESTORS
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/
Andrew M. Alexander
|
|
|
Andrew
M. Alexander
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/
Joe D. Shafer
|
|
|
Joe
D. Shafer
|
|
|
Vice
President/Chief Accounting Officer
|
|
|
(Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
DATE: November
7, 2008
EXHIBIT
INDEX
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Exhibits:
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
—
|
Restated
Declaration of Trust (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to WRI's Registration Statement
on Form 8-A dated January 19, 1999 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
3.2
|
—
|
Amendment
of the Restated Declaration of Trust (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to WRI's
Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated January 19, 1999 and incorporated
herein by reference).
|
3.3
|
—
|
Second
Amendment of the Restated Declaration of Trust (filed as Exhibit 3.3 to
WRI's Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated January 19, 1999 and
incorporated herein by reference).
|
3.4
|
—
|
Third
Amendment of the Restated Declaration of Trust (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to
WRI's Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated January 19, 1999 and
incorporated herein by reference).
|
3.5
|
—
|
Fourth
Amendment of the Restated Declaration of Trust dated April 28, 1999 (filed
as Exhibit 3.5 to WRI's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
3.6
|
—
|
Fifth
Amendment of the Restated Declaration of Trust dated April 20, 2001 (filed
as Exhibit 3.6 to WRI's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
3.7
|
—
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws of WRI (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to WRI's Registration
Statement on Form 8-A dated February 23, 1998 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
3.8
|
—
|
Amendment
of Bylaws-Direct Registration System, Section 7.2(a) dated May 3,
2007 (filed as Exhibit 3.8 to WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
4.1
|
—
|
Subordinated
Indenture dated as of May 1, 1995 between WRI and Chase Bank of Texas,
National Association (formerly, Texas Commerce Bank National Association)
(filed as Exhibit 4(a) to WRI's Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No.
33-57659) and incorporated herein by reference).
|
4.2
|
—
|
Subordinated
Indenture dated as of May 1, 1995 between WRI and Chase Bank of Texas,
National Association (formerly, Texas Commerce Bank National Association)
(filed as Exhibit 4(b) to WRI's Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No.
33-57659) and incorporated herein by reference).
|
4.3
|
—
|
Form
of Fixed Rate Senior Medium Term Note (filed as Exhibit 4.19 to WRI’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and
incorporated herein by reference).
|
4.4
|
—
|
Form
of Floating Rate Senior Medium Term Note (filed as Exhibit 4.20 to WRI’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and
incorporated herein by reference).
|
4.5
|
—
|
Form
of Fixed Rate Subordinated Medium Term Note (filed as Exhibit 4.21 to
WRI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and
incorporated herein by reference).
|
4.6
|
—
|
Form
of Floating Rate Subordinated Medium Term Note (filed as Exhibit 4.22 to
WRI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and
incorporated herein by reference).
|
4.7
|
—
|
Statement
of Designation of 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares
(filed as Exhibit 3.1 to WRI’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated
April 17, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
4.8
|
—
|
Statement
of Designation of 6.95% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares
(filed as Exhibit 3.1 to WRI’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated
July 8, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
4.9
|
—
|
Statement
of Designation of 6.50% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares
(filed as Exhibit 3.1 to WRI’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated
January 29, 2007 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
4.10
|
—
|
6.75%
Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Share Certificate (filed as
Exhibit 4.2 to WRI’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated April 17,
2003 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
4.11
|
—
|
6.95%
Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Share Certificate (filed as
Exhibit 4.2 to WRI’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated July 8, 2004
and incorporated herein by reference).
|
4.12
|
—
|
6.50%
Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Share Certificate (filed as
Exhibit 4.2 to WRI’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated January 29,
2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
4.13
|
—
|
Form
of Receipt for Depositary Shares, each representing 1/30 of a share of
6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, par value $.03 per
share (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to WRI’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A
dated April 17, 2003 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
4.14
|
—
|
Form
of Receipt for Depositary Shares, each representing 1/100 of a share of
6.95% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, par value $.03 per
share (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to WRI’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A
dated July 8, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
4.15
|
—
|
Form
of Receipt for Depositary Shares, each representing 1/100 of a share of
6.50% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, par value $.03 per
share (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to WRI’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A
dated January 29, 2007 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
4.16
|
—
|
Form
of 7% Notes due 2011 (filed as Exhibit 4.17 to WRI’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
4.17
|
—
|
Form
of 3.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to WRI’s
Form 8-K on August 2, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.1†
|
—
|
1988
Share Option Plan of WRI, as amended (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to WRI’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990 and
incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.2†
|
—
|
The
Savings and Investment Plan for Employees of Weingarten Realty Investors
dated December 17, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 10.34 on WRI’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.3†
|
—
|
The
Savings and Investment Plan for Employees of WRI, as amended (filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to WRI’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-25581) and
incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.4†
|
—
|
First
Amendment to the Savings and Investment Plan for Employees of Weingarten
Realty Investors dated August 1, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.25 on WRI’s
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein
by reference).
|
|
10.5†
|
—
|
The
Fifth Amendment to Savings and Investment Plan for Employees of WRI (filed
as Exhibit 4.1.1 to WRI’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-25581) and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.6†
|
—
|
Mandatory
Distribution Amendment for the Savings and Investment Plan for Employees
of Weingarten Realty Investors dated August 1, 2005 (filed as Exhibit
10.26 on WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and
incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.7†
|
—
|
The
1993 Incentive Share Plan of WRI (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to WRI’s
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-52473) and incorporated herein
by reference).
|
|
10.8†
|
—
|
1999
WRI Employee Share Purchase Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to WRI’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and incorporated
herein by reference).
|
|
10.9†
|
—
|
2001
Long Term Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to WRI’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.10
|
—
|
Master
Promissory Note in the amount of $20,000,000 between WRI, as payee, and
Chase Bank of Texas, National Association (formerly, Texas Commerce Bank
National Association), as maker, effective December 30, 1998 (filed as
Exhibit 4.15 to WRI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.11†
|
—
|
Weingarten
Realty Retirement Plan restated effective April 1, 2002 (filed as Exhibit
10.29 on WRI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.12†
|
—
|
First
Amendment to the Weingarten Realty Retirement Plan, dated December 31,
2003 (filed as Exhibit 10.33 on WRI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.13†
|
—
|
First
Amendment to the Weingarten Realty Pension Plan, dated August 1, 2005
(filed as Exhibit 10.27 on WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
10.14†
|
—
|
Mandatory
Distribution Amendment for the Weingarten Realty Retirement Plan dated
August 1, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.28 on WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.15†
|
—
|
Weingarten
Realty Investors Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan amended and
restated effective September 1, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 10.10 on WRI’s Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.16†
|
—
|
First
Amendment to the Weingarten Realty Investors Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan amended on November 3, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 10.11 on
WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated
herein by reference).
|
10.17†
|
—
|
Second
Amendment to the Weingarten Realty Investors Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan amended October 22, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.12 on WRI’s
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.18†
|
—
|
Third
Amendment to the Weingarten Realty Investors Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan amended October 22, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.13 on WRI’s
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.19†
|
—
|
Weingarten
Realty Investors Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan adopted effective
September 1, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 10.14 on WRI’s Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.20†
|
—
|
First
Amendment to the Weingarten Realty Investors Retirement Benefit
Restoration Plan amended on November 3, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 10.15 on
WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated
herein by reference).
|
10.21†
|
—
|
Second
Amendment to the Weingarten Realty Investors Retirement Benefit
Restoration Plan amended October 22, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.16 on WRI’s
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.22†
|
—
|
Third
Amendment to the Weingarten Realty Pension Plan dated December 23, 2005
(filed as Exhibit 10.30 on WRI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.23†
|
—
|
Weingarten
Realty Investors Deferred Compensation Plan amended and restated as a
separate and independent plan effective September 1, 2002 (filed as
Exhibit 10.17 on WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and
incorporated herein by reference).
|
10.24†
|
—
|
Supplement
to the Weingarten Realty Investors Deferred Compensation Plan amended on
April 25, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 10.18 on WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.25†
|
—
|
First
Amendment to the Weingarten Realty Investors Deferred Compensation Plan
amended on November 3, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 10.19 on WRI’s Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.26†
|
—
|
Second
Amendment to the Weingarten Realty Investors Deferred Compensation Plan,
as amended, dated October 13, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.29 on WRI’s Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.27†
|
—
|
Trust
Under the Weingarten Realty Investors Deferred Compensation Plan amended
and restated effective October 21, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 10.21 on WRI’s
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.28†
|
—
|
Fourth
Amendment to the Weingarten Realty Investors Deferred Compensation Plan,
dated December 23, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.31 on WRI’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.29†
|
—
|
Trust
Under the Weingarten Realty Investors Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan
amended and restated effective October 21, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 10.22 on
WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated
herein by reference).
|
10.30†
|
—
|
Trust
Under the Weingarten Realty Investors Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan amended and restated effective October 21, 2003 (filed as Exhibit
10.23 on WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and
incorporated herein by reference).
|
10.31†
|
—
|
First
Amendment to the Trust Under the Weingarten Realty Investors Deferred
Compensation Plan, Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, and Retirement
Benefit Restoration Plan amended on March 16, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.24
on WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated
herein by reference).
|
10.32†
|
—
|
Third
Amendment to the Weingarten Realty Investors Deferred Compensation Plan
dated August 1, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.30 on WRI’s Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.33
|
—
|
Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement dated February 22, 2006 among Weingarten
Realty Investors, the Lenders Party Hereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
as Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.32 on WRI’s Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated by
reference).
|
10.34
|
—
|
Amendment
Agreement dated November 7, 2007 to the Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.34 on WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.35†
|
—
|
Fifth
Amendment to the Weingarten Realty Investors Deferred Compensation Plan
(filed as Exhibit 10.34 to WRI’s Form 10-Q for quarter ended June 30, 2006
and incorporated herein by reference).
|
10.36†
|
—
|
Restatement
of the Weingarten Realty Investors Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
dated August 4, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.35 to WRI’s Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.37†
|
—
|
Restatement
of the Weingarten Realty Investors Deferred Compensation Plan dated August
4, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.36 to WRI’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.38†
|
—
|
Restatement
of the Weingarten Realty Investors Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan
dated August 4, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.37 to WRI’s Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.39†
|
—
|
Amendment
No. 1 to the Weingarten Realty Investors Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan dated December 15, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.38 on WRI’s Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 and incorporated by
reference).
|
10.40†
|
—
|
Amendment
No. 1 to the Weingarten Realty Investors Retirement Benefit Restoration
Plan dated December 15, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.39 on WRI’s Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 and incorporated by
reference).
|
10.41†
|
—
|
Amendment
No. 1 to the Weingarten Realty Investors Deferred Compensation Plan dated
December 15, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.40 on WRI’s Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2006 and incorporated by reference).
|
10.42†
|
—
|
Final
401(k)/401(m) Regulations Amendment dated December 15, 2006 (filed as
Exhibit 10.41 on WRI’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and
incorporated by reference).
|
10.43†
|
—
|
Amendment
No. 2 to the Weingarten Realty Investors Retirement Benefit Restoration
Plan dated November 9, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.43 on WRI’s Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2007 and incorporated by
reference).
|
10.44†
|
—
|
Amendment
No. 2 to the Weingarten Realty Investors Deferred Compensation Plan dated
November 9, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.44 on WRI’s Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007 and incorporated by reference).
|
10.45†
|
—
|
Amendment
No. 2 to the Weingarten Realty Investors Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan dated November 9, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.45 on WRI’s Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2007 and incorporated by
reference).
|
10.46†
|
—
|
Severance
Benefit and Stay Pay Bonus Plan dated September 20, 2007 (filed as Exhibit
10.46 on WRI’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and
incorporated by reference).
|
10.47†
|
—
|
2007
Reduction in Force Severance Pay Plan dated November 6, 2007 (filed as
Exhibit 10.47 on WRI’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and
incorporated by reference).
|
10.48†*
|
—
|
|
14.1
|
—
|
Code
of Ethical Conduct for Senior Financial Officers – Andrew M. Alexander
(filed as Exhibit 14.1 to WRI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
14.2
|
—
|
Code
of Ethical Conduct for Senior Financial Officers – Stephen C. Richter
(filed as Exhibit 14.2 to WRI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
14.3
|
—
|
Code
of Ethical Conduct for Senior Financial Officers – Joe D. Shafer (filed as
Exhibit 14.3 to WRI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
31.1*
|
—
|
|
31.2*
|
—
|
|
32.1**
|
—
|
|
32.2**
|
—
|
|
_______________
*
|
Filed
with this report.
|
**
|
Furnished
with this report.
|
†
|
Management
contract or compensation plan or
arrangement.
|
49