form10_q.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period
|
Commission File Number 1-11398
|
ended June 30, 2012
|
|
CPI AEROSTRUCTURES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
New York
|
11-2520310
|
(State or other jurisdiction
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number)
|
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
91 Heartland Blvd., Edgewood, NY
|
11717
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(zip code)
|
(631) 586-5200
(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No £
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated filer x
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No x
As of August 6, 2012, the number of shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share, outstanding was 8,353,469.
Part I - Financial Information
Item 1 – Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
Condensed Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2012 (Unaudited) and
|
3
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
Condensed Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months ended June 30, 2012 (Unaudited) and 2011 (Unaudited)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for the Six Months
|
5
|
Ended June 30, 2012 (Unaudited) and 2011 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months ended June 30, 2012
|
6
|
(Unaudited) and 2011 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
7
|
|
|
Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
|
15
|
and Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
21
|
|
|
Item 4 – Controls and Procedures
|
21
|
|
|
Part II - Other Information
|
|
|
|
Item 1 – Legal Proceedings
|
22
|
|
|
Item 1A – Risk Factors
|
22
|
|
|
Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
22
|
|
|
Item 3 – Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
22
|
|
|
Item 4 – Mine Safety Disclosures
|
22
|
|
|
Item 5 – Other Information
|
22
|
|
|
Item 6 – Exhibits
|
22
|
|
|
Signatures
|
23
|
|
|
Exhibits
|
24
|
Part I - Financial Information
Item 1 – Financial Statements
|
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
|
2012
|
2011
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Note 1)
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
3,604,047 |
|
|
$ |
878,200 |
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
8,719,108 |
|
|
|
4,285,570 |
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contracts
|
|
|
88,717,666 |
|
|
|
79,010,362 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
257,000 |
|
|
|
257,000 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
681,595 |
|
|
|
662,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
101,979,416 |
|
|
|
85,093,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
3,079,313 |
|
|
|
2,629,569 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,162,000 |
|
|
|
1,105,000 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
108,080 |
|
|
|
112,080 |
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
106,328,809 |
|
|
$ |
88,940,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
9,211,509 |
|
|
$ |
11,998,244 |
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
225,358 |
|
|
|
994,398 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
1,749,487 |
|
|
|
887,380 |
|
Line of credit
|
|
|
14,600,000 |
|
|
|
16,100,000 |
|
Income tax payable
|
|
|
3,653,070 |
|
|
|
2,802,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
29,564,424 |
|
|
|
32,907,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
4,000,716 |
|
|
|
889,239 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
660,000 |
|
|
|
660,000 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
551,418 |
|
|
|
457,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
34,776,558 |
|
|
|
34,913,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’ Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock - $.001 par value; authorized 50,000,000 shares,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
issued 8,157,719 and 7,079,638 shares, respectively, and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding 8,157,719 and 6,946,381 shares, respectively
|
|
|
8,158 |
|
|
|
7,080 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
47,148,011 |
|
|
|
35,346,273 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
24,450,190 |
|
|
|
19,834,852 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(54,108 |
) |
|
|
(21,772 |
) |
Treasury stock, 0 and 133,257 shares, respectively (at cost)
|
|
|
---- |
|
|
|
(1,140,226 |
) |
Total Shareholders’ Equity
|
|
|
71,552,251 |
|
|
|
54,026,207 |
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
|
|
$ |
106,328,809 |
|
|
$ |
88,940,107 |
|
See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
For the Six Months Ended
|
|
June 30,
|
June 30,
|
|
2012
|
2011
|
2012
|
2011
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
Revenue
|
$20,854,627
|
$17,426,223
|
$40,575,722
|
$33,435,831
|
Cost of sales
|
15,085,983
|
13,181,422
|
29,842,692
|
25,340,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
5,768,644
|
4,244,801
|
10,733,030
|
8,094,905
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
1,570,231
|
2,082,464
|
3,675,112
|
3,882,887
|
Income from operations
|
4,198,413
|
2,162,337
|
7,057,918
|
4,212,018
|
Interest expense
|
174,394
|
67,521
|
323,580
|
105,153
|
Income before provision for
|
|
|
|
|
income taxes
|
4,024,019
|
2,094,816
|
6,734,338
|
4,106,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
1,328,000
|
524,000
|
2,119,000
|
1,168,000
|
Net income
Other comprehensive income (loss),
net of tax
Change in unrealized gain (loss)-
interest rate swap
Comprehensive income
|
2,696,019
(7,058)
$2,688,961
|
1,570,816
3,552
$1,574,368
|
4,615,338
(32,336)
$4,583,002
|
2,938,865
11,268
$2,950,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per common share – basic
|
$0.37
|
$0.23
|
$0.65
|
$0.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per common share – diluted
|
$0.36
|
$0.22
|
$0.63
|
$0.41
|
Shares used in computing income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
7,222,554
|
6,847,357
|
7,087,732
|
6,821,437
|
Diluted
|
7,414,273
|
7,148,591
|
7,280,294
|
7,124,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
3
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
Common Stock
Shares
|
Amount
|
Additional Paid-in Capital
|
Retained Earnings
|
Treasury Stock
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
|
Total Shareholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2011
|
6,911,570
|
$6,912
|
$33,272,237
|
$12,417,924
|
$(981,226)
|
$(45,404)
|
$44,670,443
|
Net Income
|
----
|
----
|
----
|
2,938,865
|
----
|
----
|
2,938,865
|
Change in unrealized loss from interest rate swap
|
----
|
----
|
----
|
----
|
----
|
11,268
|
11,268
|
Common stock issued upon exercise of options
|
137,000
|
137
|
410,813
|
----
|
----
|
----
|
410,950
|
Stock compensation expense
Tax benefit from stock option plans
|
----
----
|
----
----
|
942,226
438,000
|
----
----
|
----
|
----
|
942,226
438,000
|
Treasury stock acquired |
---- |
---- |
---- |
---- |
(159,000) |
---- |
(159,000) |
Balance at June 30, 2011
|
7,048,570
|
$7,049
|
$35,063,276
|
$15,356,789
|
$(1,140,226)
|
$(34,136)
|
$49,252,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2012
|
7,079,638
|
$7,080
|
$35,346,273
|
$19,834,852
|
$(1,140,226)
|
$(21,772)
|
$54,026,207
|
Net Income
|
----
|
----
|
----
|
4,615,338
|
----
|
----
|
4,615,338
|
Change in unrealized loss from interest rate swap
|
----
|
----
|
----
|
----
|
----
|
(32,336)
|
(32,336)
|
Common stock issued in share
offering
Common stock issued upon exercise
of options
|
1,000,000
196,078
|
1,000
196
|
11,106,580
1,224,319
|
----
|
----
|
----
|
11,107,580
1,224,515
|
Common stock issued as bonus
|
15,260
|
15
|
228,275
|
----
|
----
|
----
|
228,290
|
Stock compensation expense
|
----
|
----
|
382,657
|
----
|
----
|
----
|
382,657
|
Treasury stock retired |
(133,257) |
(133) |
(1,140,093) |
---- |
1,140,226 |
---- |
---- |
Balance at June 30, 2012
|
8,157,719
|
$8,158
|
$47,148,011
|
$24,450,190
|
$----
|
$(54,108)
|
$71,552,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
|
2012
|
2011
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$ |
4,615,338 |
|
|
$ |
2,938,865 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
300,320 |
|
|
|
210,576 |
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
45,532 |
|
|
|
(8,937 |
) |
Stock compensation
|
|
|
382,657 |
|
|
|
942,226 |
|
Deferred portion of provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(57,000 |
) |
|
|
(273,000 |
) |
Tax benefit of stock options
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
(438,000 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable
|
|
|
(4,433,538 |
) |
|
|
1,707,083 |
|
Increase in costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
(9,707,304 |
) |
|
|
(13,716,055 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
117,844 |
|
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(3,327,485 |
) |
|
|
(538 |
) |
Increase in income taxes payable
|
|
|
851,070 |
|
|
|
1,327,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(11,329,768 |
) |
|
|
(7,192,936 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities – purchase of plant and equipment
|
|
|
(673,472 |
) |
|
|
(261,021 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment on long-term debt
|
|
|
(603,008 |
) |
|
|
(389,644 |
) |
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
|
|
4,500,000 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Proceeds from line of credit
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
7,000,000 |
|
Payments on line of credit
|
|
|
(3,000,000 |
) |
|
|
--- |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
1,224,515 |
|
|
|
251,950 |
|
Proceeds from sale of common stock
|
|
|
11,107,580 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Tax benefit of stock options
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
438,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
14,729,087 |
|
|
|
7,300,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
2,725,847 |
|
|
|
(153,651 |
) |
Cash at beginning of period
|
|
|
878,200 |
|
|
|
823,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period
|
|
$ |
3,604,047 |
|
|
$ |
669,725 |
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment acquired under capital lease
|
|
$ |
76,592 |
|
|
$ |
343,492 |
|
Common stock issued for bonuses
|
|
$ |
228,290 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$ |
606,352 |
|
|
$ |
108,366 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
$ |
1,400,000 |
|
|
$ |
180,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
|
|
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
1. INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The condensed financial statements of CPI Aerostructures, Inc. (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2012 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading.
The condensed balance sheet at December 31, 2011 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. All adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation for the periods presented have been reflected as required by the SEC. Such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. It is suggested that these condensed financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the full year or any other interim period.
On January 1, 2012, the Company adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification 220, “Comprehensive Income.” The new guidance requires the Company to present Comprehensive Income either on one continuous statement of Income and Comprehensive Income, or on a separate Statement of Comprehensive Income. The new guidance does not change the computation of Net Income or Comprehensive Income.
The Company maintains its cash in two financial institutions. The balances are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. From time to time, the Company's balances may exceed these limits. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had approximately $3,700,000 of uninsured balances. The Company limits its credit risk by selecting financial institutions considered to be highly credit worthy.
2.
|
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
|
The Company accounts for compensation expense associated with stock options based on the fair value of the options on the date of grant.
The Company’s net income for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 includes approximately $383,000 of non-cash compensation expense related to the Company’s stock options. The Company’s net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 includes approximately $655,000 and $942,000, respectively, of noncash compensation expense related to the Company’s stock options. The noncash compensation expense related to all of the Company’s stock-based compensation arrangements is recorded as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses.
The estimated fair value of each option award granted was determined on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The following weighted-average assumptions were used for the options granted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
|
2012
|
2011
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
0.9%
|
2.1%
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
102%
|
101%
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
0%
|
0%
|
Expected option term
|
5 years
|
5 years
|
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
A summary of the status of the Company’s stock option plans as of June 30, 2012 and changes during the six months ended June 30, 2012 is as follows:
|
Weighted average Exercise Price
|
Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years)
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
|
|
Options
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
at beginning of period
|
695,000
|
$6.68
|
|
|
Granted
|
40,517
|
11.87
|
|
|
Exercised
|
(205,000)
|
6.65
|
|
|
Outstanding and vested
|
|
|
|
|
at end of period
|
530,517
|
$9.25
|
3.13
|
$1,285,746
|
Options to acquire 40,517 shares of common stock were granted on January 1, 2012 to members of our board of directors as part of their normal compensation.
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, 170,000 stock options were exercised for cash resulting in proceeds to the Company of $1,122,700. During the same period an additional 10,000 options were exercised, pursuant to provisions of the stock option plan, where the Company received no cash and 4,589 shares of its common stock in exchange for the 10,000 shares issued in the exercise. The 4,589 shares that the Company received were valued at $69,095, the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise. Lastly, an additional 25,000 options were exercised, pursuant to provisions of the stock option plan, for a combination of cash and common shares. The Company received $102,815 in cash and 4,333 shares in exchange for the 25,000 shares issued in this exercise. The 4,333 shares that the Company received were valued at $69,930, the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise.
The intrinsic value of all options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was approximately $1,252,950 and $1,514,000, respectively.
3. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE
Our use of derivative instruments has been to hedge interest rates. These derivative contracts are entered into with a financial institution. We do not use derivative instruments for trading purposes and we have procedures in place to monitor and control their use.
We record these derivative financial instruments on the condensed balance sheets at fair value. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Any ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument for a cash flow hedge is recorded in the results of operations immediately. For derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments, the gain or loss is recognized in the results of operations immediately.
In October 2008 and March 2012, the Company entered into interest rate swaps with the objective of reducing our exposure to cash flow volatility arising from interest rate fluctuations associated with certain debt. The notional amount, maturity date, and currency of these contracts match those of the underlying debt. The Company has designated these interest rate swap contracts as cash flow hedges. The Company measures ineffectiveness by comparing the cumulative change in the forward contact with the cumulative change in the hedged item. No material ineffectiveness was recognized in the quarter ended June 30, 2012. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had a net deferred loss associated with cash flow hedges of approximately $82,000 and $33,000, respectively, due to the interest rate swap which has been included in Other Liabilities.
As a result of the use of derivative instruments, the Company is exposed to risk that the counterparties may fail to meet their contractual obligations. Recent adverse developments in the global financial and credit markets could negatively impact the creditworthiness of our counterparties and cause one or more of our counterparties to fail to perform as expected. To mitigate the counterparty credit risk, we only enter into contracts with carefully selected major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors, and continually assess the creditworthiness of counterparties. To date, all counterparties have performed in accordance with their contractual obligations.
Fair Value
At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the fair values of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximated their carrying values because of the short-term nature of these instruments.
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
Carrying Amount
|
Fair Value
|
Debt
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings and long-term debt
|
$20,350,203
|
$20,350,203
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
Carrying Amount
|
Fair Value
|
Debt
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings and long-term debt
|
$17,876,619
|
$17,876,619
|
We estimated the fair value of debt using market quotes and calculations based on market rates.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents the fair values of those financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
|
|
Fair Value Measurements June 30, 2012
|
|
Description
|
Total
|
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical assets (Level 1)
|
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
|
|
Interest Rate Swap, net
|
$ 81,982
|
--
|
$ 81,982
|
--
|
|
Total
|
$ 81,982
|
--
|
$ 81,982
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements December 31, 2011
|
Description
|
Total
|
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical assets (Level 1)
|
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
|
Interest Rate Swap, net
|
$32,988
|
--
|
$32,988
|
--
|
Total
|
$32,988
|
--
|
$32,988
|
--
|
The fair value of the Company’s interest rate swaps was determined by comparing the fixed rate set at the inception of the transaction to the “replacement swap rate,” which represents the market rate for an offsetting interest rate swap with the same notional amounts and final maturity date. The market value is then determined by calculating the present value interest differential between the contractual swap and the replacement swap.
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, $81,982 and $32,988, respectively, was included in Other Liabilities related to the fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap, and $54,108 and $21,772, respectively, net of tax of $27,874 and $11,216, was included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
4. COSTS AND ESTIMATED EARNINGS ON UNCOMPLETED CONTRACTS
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts consist of:
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
U.S
|
|
|
|
Government
|
Commercial
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Costs incurred on uncompleted
|
|
|
|
Contracts
|
$189,660,656
|
$32,650,144
|
$222,310,800
|
Estimated earnings
|
76,045,372
|
18,808,566
|
94,853,938
|
Sub-total
|
265,706,028
|
51,458,710
|
317,164,738
|
Less billings to date
|
194,687,800
|
33,759,272
|
228,447,072
|
Costs and estimated earnings
|
|
|
|
in excess of billings on
|
|
|
|
uncompleted contracts
|
$71,018,228
|
$17,699,438
|
$88,717,666
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
|
Government
|
Commercial
|
Total
|
Costs incurred on uncompleted
|
|
|
|
contracts
|
$162,233,699
|
$24,713,310
|
$186,947,009
|
Estimated earnings
|
72,883,505
|
15,029,802
|
87,913,307
|
Sub-total
|
235,117,204
|
39,743,112
|
274,860,316
|
Less billings to date
|
171,694,325
|
24,155,629
|
195,849,954
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts
|
$63,422,879
|
$15,587,483
|
$79,010,362
|
U.S. Government Contracts includes contracts directly with the U.S. Government and Government subcontracts.
Revisions in the estimated gross profits on contracts and contract amounts are made in the period in which the circumstances requiring the revisions occur. During the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the effect of such revisions in total estimated contract profits resulted in a decrease to the total gross profit to be earned on the contracts of approximately $528,000 and $1,800,000, respectively, from that which would have been reported had the revised estimates been used as the basis of recognition of contract profits in prior years.
Although management believes it has established adequate procedures for estimating costs to complete on uncompleted open contracts, it is possible that additional significant costs could occur on contracts prior to completion.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
5.
|
INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
|
Basic income per common share is computed using the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Diluted income per common share for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is computed using the weighted-average number of shares outstanding adjusted for the incremental shares attributed to outstanding options to purchase common stock. Incremental shares of 475,517 were used in the calculation of diluted income per common share in both the three and six month period ended June 30, 2012. Incremental shares of 55,000 were not included in the diluted earnings per share calculations for both the three and six month period ended June 30, 2012 as their exercise price was in excess of the Company’s average stock price for the respective period and, accordingly, these shares are not assumed to be exercised for the diluted earnings per share calculation, as they would be anti-dilutive. Incremental shares of 643,333 and 668,333 were used in the calculation of diluted income per common share in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. Incremental shares of 80,000 and 55,000 were not included in the diluted earnings per share calculations for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2011, respectively, as their exercise price was in excess of the Company’s average stock price for the respective period and, accordingly, these shares are not assumed to be exercise for the diluted earnings per share calculation, as they would be anti-dilutive.
In August 2007, we entered into a revolving credit facility with Sovereign Bank (the “Sovereign Revolving Facility”), secured by all of our assets.
On May 26, 2010, the Company and Sovereign Bank entered into a third amendment to the Sovereign Revolving Facility increasing the existing revolving credit facility under the Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) from an aggregate of $3.5 million to an aggregate of $4.0 million and extending the term of the revolving credit facility from August 2011 to August 2013. In addition, the interest rate on borrowings under the revolving credit facility was decreased to (i) the greater of 3.75% or 3.25% in excess of the LIBOR Rate or (ii) the greater of 3.75% or 0.50% in excess of Sovereign Bank’s prime rate, as elected by the Company in accordance with the Credit Agreement.
On May 10, 2011, the Company entered into a fifth amendment to its credit agreement with Sovereign Bank, increasing the existing revolving credit facility from an aggregate of $4.0 million to an aggregate of $10.0 million and extending the term from August 2013 to August 2014. In addition, the interest rate of borrowings under the revolving credit facility will no longer be subject to a minimum rate of 3.75%.
On September 1, 2011, the Company entered into a sixth amendment to its credit agreement with Sovereign Bank, providing for a $3.0 million increase until November 30, 2011 of the existing revolving credit facility under the Credit Agreement, from an aggregate of $10.0 million to an aggregate of $13.0 million.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
On November 29, 2011, the Company entered into a seventh amendment to its credit agreement with Sovereign Bank, which increased the revolving credit facility under the Credit Agreement from an aggregate of $13.0 million to an aggregate of $18.0 million and extended the term of earlier terminating revolving credit loans to August 2014. The Amendment also provides for a reduction in the interest rate of borrowings under the revolving credit facility to 2.75% in excess of the LIBOR rate or Sovereign Bank’s prime rate, as elected by the Company in accordance with the Credit Agreement, a reduction in the commitment fee to a rate of 0.4% per annum on the average daily unused portion of the revolving credit commitment, commencing December 31, 2011 and the addition of a covenant to the Credit Agreement requiring that the Company maintain a ratio of Unsubordinated Liabilities to Capital Base, as such terms are defined in the Credit Agreement.
As of June 30, 2012, the Company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants, as amended, contained in the Credit Agreement and $14.6 million was outstanding under the Sovereign Revolving Facility.
7. LONG-TERM DEBT
On October 22, 2008, the Company obtained a $3.0 million term loan from Sovereign Bank to be amortized over five years (the “Sovereign Term Facility”). The Sovereign Term Facility bears interest at LIBOR (0.273875% at June 30, 2012) plus 2.5% and is secured by all of the assets of the Company.
The terms and conditions of the Sovereign Revolving Facility are applicable to the Sovereign Term Facility.
Additionally, the Company and Sovereign Bank entered into a five-year interest rate swap agreement, in the notional amount of $3 million. Under the interest rate swap, the Company pays an amount to Sovereign Bank representing interest on the notional amount at a rate of 5.8% and receives an amount from Sovereign representing interest on the notional amount at a rate equal to the one-month LIBOR. The effect of this interest rate swap will be the Company paying a fixed interest rate of 5.8% over the term of the Sovereign Term Facility.
On March 9, 2012, the Company entered into an eighth amendment to its credit agreement with Sovereign Bank, which Amendment provides for an additional term loan from Sovereign in the principal amount of $4.5 million to be amortized over five years (the “Sovereign Term Facility 2”). The Sovereign Term Facility 2 shall be used by the Company to purchase tooling and equipment in connection with certain contracts. The Sovereign Term Facility 2 is subject to the same acceleration provision as the Revolving Credit Loans and the Sovereign Term Facility, which provision allows Sovereign, at its option, to declare all Loans and other outstanding amounts under the Credit Agreement as due and payable upon the occurrence of any Event of Default. The Amendment also requires a prepayment of the Sovereign Term Facility 2 upon the Company’s receipt of a termination or cancellation payment in connection with the Designated Contracts in an amount equal to the lesser of 50% of such payment or the outstanding principal balance of the Sovereign Term Facility 2.
Pursuant to the terms of the ISDA 2002 Master Agreement and Schedule between Sovereign and the Company, dated October 22, 2008, the Company also entered into a five-year interest rate swap agreement in the notional amount of $4.5 million. Under the Interest Rate Swap, the Company pays an amount to Sovereign representing interest on the notional amount at a fixed rate of 4.11% and receives an amount from Sovereign representing interest on the notional amount at a rate equal to the one month LIBOR rate plus 300 basis points. The effect of this Interest Rate Swap will be the Company paying a fixed interest rate of 4.11% over the term of the Sovereign Term Facility 2.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The maturities of long-term debt are as follows:
Twelve months ending June 30,
|
|
2013
|
$1,749,487
|
2014
|
1,318,623
|
2015
|
967,650
|
2016
|
955,313
|
2017
|
759,130
|
|
$5,750,203
|
|
|
In addition to the Sovereign Term Facilities, included in long-term debt are capital leases and notes payable of $550,203, including a current portion of $249,487.
8. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
During each of the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, 9% of revenue was directly from the U.S. Government. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company’s three largest commercial customers accounted for 38%, 19% and 15% of revenue, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company’s three largest commercial customers accounted for 33%, 33% and 11% of revenue, respectively.
At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, 5.5% and 7.5% of Costs and Estimated Earnings in Excess of Billings on Uncompleted Contracts, respectively, were from the U.S. Government.
At June 30, 2012, 41%, 25,%, 15% and 10% of Costs and Estimated Earnings in Excess of Billings on Uncompleted Contracts were from four largest commercial customers. At December 31, 2011, 40%, 21,%, 15% and 13% of Costs and Estimated Earnings in Excess of Billings on Uncompleted Contracts were from the Company’s four largest commercial customers.
At June 30, 2012, 31%, 20%, 16%, 14% and 11% of our accounts receivable were from our five largest commercial customers. At December 31, 2011, 36%, 34%, and 12% of accounts receivable were from our three largest commercial customers.
9. EQUITY
On June 13, 2012, the Company sold 1,000,000 shares of common stock at a sales price of $12 per share, upon the closing of an underwritten stock offering. Roth Capital Partner, LLC acted as representative of the several underwriters (the “Underwriters”). The gross proceeds of the offering were $12 million and net proceeds, after deducting the Underwriters’ fees and estimated offering expenses, were approximately $11.1 million. The Company used $3 million of the net proceeds to repay a portion of the Sovereign Revolving Facility.
10. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On July 3, 2012, the Underwriters exercised their over-alloment option whereby the Company sold an additional 195,750 common shares at a price of $12 per share. The Company’s net proceeds were approximately $2.2 million after deducting Underwriters’ fees and estimated offering expenses. The Company used $1 million of the net proceeds to repay a portion of the Sovereign Revolving Facility.
Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Condensed Financial Statements and notes thereto contained in this report.
Forward Looking Statements
When used in this Form 10-Q and in future filings by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the words or phrases “will likely result,” “management expects” or “we expect,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “estimated” or similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, each of which speaks only as of the date made. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical earnings and those presently anticipated or projected. The risks are included in Item 1A - Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 and Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in this Form 10-Q. We have no obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions which may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances occurring after the date of such statements.
Business Operations
We are engaged in the contract production of structural aircraft parts principally for the U.S. Air Force and other branches of the U.S. armed forces, either as a prime contractor or as a subcontractor to other defense prime contractors. CPI Aero also acts as a subcontractor to prime aircraft manufacturers in the production of commercial aircraft parts. Our strategy for growth has been focused primarily as a subcontractor for defense prime contractors. Due to our success as a subcontractor to defense prime contractors we have pursued opportunities to increase our commercial subcontracting business.
Marketing and New Business
From the beginning of the current fiscal year through August 3, 2012, we received approximately $44.6 million of new contract awards, which included approximately $0.2 million of government prime contract awards, approximately $43.9 million of government subcontract awards and approximately $0.5 million of commercial subcontract awards, compared to a total of $58.6 million of new contract awards, of all types, in the same period last year.
Included in new contract awards are:
·
|
A $12.7 million purchase order from Boeing for assemblies on the A-10 aircraft.
|
·
|
A $10.7 million order from Goodrich Corporation for the supply of structural aerospace assemblies. In addition, we will have, for the first time in our history, design authority for design modifications to the structure it is manufacturing.
|
We have approximately $980 million in formalized bids outstanding as of August 4, 2012 and continue to make bids on contracts on a weekly basis. Unawarded solicitations include two bids totaling approximately $647 million to an international aerospace company for work on the Boeing 787. While we cannot predict the probability of obtaining or the timing of awards, some of these outstanding proposals are significant in amount.
Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
While historically our direct U.S. Government work has typically ranged from six months to two years, our major subcontract awards for the E-2D, A-10 and G650 average a 7 year life. Except in cases where contract terms permit us to bill on a progress basis, we must incur upfront costs in producing assemblies, amortize the costs and bill our customers upon delivery. Because of the upfront costs incurred, the timing of our billings and the nature of the percentage-of-completion method of accounting described below, there can be a significant disparity between the periods in which (a) costs are expended, (b) revenue and earnings are recorded and (c) cash is received.
Critical Accounting Policies
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue from our contracts over the contractual period under the percentage-of-completion (“POC”) method of accounting. Under the POC method of accounting, sales and gross profit are recognized as work is performed based on the relationship between actual costs incurred and total estimated costs at the completion of the contract. Recognized revenues that will not be billed under the terms of the contract until a later date are recorded as an asset captioned “Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts.” Contracts where billings to date have exceeded recognized revenues are recorded as a liability captioned “Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts.” Changes to the original estimates may be required during the life of the contract. Estimates are reviewed monthly and the effect of any change in the estimated gross margin percentage for a contract is reflected in revenue in the period the change becomes known. The use of the POC method of accounting involves considerable use of estimates in determining revenues, costs and profits and in assigning the amounts to accounting periods. As a result, there can be a significant disparity between earnings (both for accounting and tax purposes) as reported and actual cash received by us during any reporting period. We continually evaluate all of the issues related to the assumptions, risks and uncertainties inherent with the application of the POC method of accounting; however, we cannot assure you that our estimates will be accurate. If our estimates are not accurate or a contract is terminated, we will be forced to adjust revenue in later periods. Furthermore, even if our estimates are accurate, we may have a shortfall in our cash flow and we may need to borrow money, or seek access to other forms of liquidity, to fund our work in process or to pay taxes until the reported earnings materialize as actual cash receipts.
Item2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
Results of Operations
Revenue
Revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $20,854,627 compared to $17,426,223 for the same period last year, representing an increase of $3,428,404 or 19.7%. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, revenue was $40,575,722 compared to $33,435,831 for the same period last year, representing an increase of $7,139,891 or 21.4%.
We generate revenue from government contracts for which we act as a prime contractor or as a subcontractor as well as from commercial contracts. Revenue generated from prime government contracts for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $3,570,726 compared to $3,131,184 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, an increase of $439,542 or 14.0%. This increase was predominitley the result of increased revenue on the C-5 TOP contract in 2012.
Revenue generated from government subcontracts for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $25,289,399 compared to $26,196,691 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of $907,292 or 3.6%. This decrease is predominately the result of a $4.2 million increase in revenue on the E-2D program for Northrop Grumman, for normal scheduling increases, offset by a $4.9 million decrease in revenue on the Boeing A-10 program.
Revenue generated from commercial contracts was $11,715,596 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $4,107,956 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, an increase of $7,607,640 or 185.2%. The majority of the increase in revenue from commercial customers was related to increases in production of leading edges for the Gulfstream G650 ($4 million) and preliminary work for Honda ($1.8 million) on the production of flaps and inlets for the HondaJet Advanced Light Jet.
Inflation historically has not had a material effect on our operations.
Gross Profit
Gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $5,768,644 compared to $4,244,801 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, an increase of $1,52,843. As a percentage of revenue, gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was 27.7% compared to 24.4% for the same period last year. Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $10,733,030 compared to $8,094,905 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, an increase of $2,638,125. As a percentage of revenue, gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was 26.5% compared to 24.2% for the same period last year. Our gross margin percentage for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was in line with our expected gross margin percentage of 25%-27%.
We expect our gross margin for the full year to fall within our expected range of 25%-27%.
Item2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 were $1,570,231 compared to $2,082,464 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of $512,233, or 24.6%. This decrease was predominately the result of changing policy of issuing stock options to most of our board of directors. In 2012, options were granted only in the first quarter of the year, compared to granting options in both first and second quarters in 2011. In addition, the 2012 board compensation arrangement limits the expense related to stock option grants.
For the six months ended June 30, 2012, selling, general and administrative expenses were $3,675,112, compared to $3,882,887 for the same period last year, a decrease of $207,775 or 5.4%.
Income Before Provision for Income Taxes
Income before provision for income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $4,024,019 compared to $2,094,816 for the same period last year, an increase of $1,929,203. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, income before provision for income taxes was $6,734,338 compared to $4,106,865 for the same period last year, an increase of $2,627,473.
Provision for Income Taxes
Provision for income taxes was $1,328,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, or 33% of pre-tax income, compared to $524,000 or 25% of pre-tax income for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Provision for income taxes was $2,119,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, or 31.5% of pre-tax income compared to $1,168,000 or 28% or pre-tax income for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The provision for income taxes as a percentage of pre-tax income was below the statutory rate of 34% because in 2011 the Company began taking a deduction for domestic production activity which results in approximately a 2%-3% tax savings. In addition, the exercise of non-qualified stock options in 2011 results in a tax savings of an additional 2%-3%. During 2012, the Company accrued penalties and interest for underpayment of income taxes which offset these deductions by 3% - 4%.
Item2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $2,696,019, or $0.37 per basic share, compared to net income of $1,570,816, or $0.23 per basic share, for the same period last year. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $4,615,338, or $0.65 per basic share, compared to net income of $2,938,865, or $0.43 per basic share, for the same period last year. Diluted income per share for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $0.36, calculated utilizing 7,414,273 average shares outstanding. Diluted income per share for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $0.63, calculated utilizing 7,280,294 average shares outstanding.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2012, we had working capital of $72,414,992 compared to $52,186,436 at December 31, 2011, an increase of $20,228,556, or 38.8%.
On June 13, 2012, the Company sold 1,000,000 shares of common stock at a sales price of $12 per share, upon the closing of an underwritten stock offering. Roth Capital Partner, LLC acted as representative of the several underwriters (the “Underwriters”). The gross proceeds of the offering were $12 million and net proceeds, after deducting the Underwriters’ fees and estimated offering expenses, were approximately $11.1 million. The Company used $3 million of the net proceeds to repay a portion of the Sovereign Revolving Facility.
A large portion of our cash is used to pay for materials and processing costs associated with contracts that are in process and which do not provide for progress payments. Contracts that permit us to bill on a progress basis must be classified as “on time” for us to apply for progress payments. Costs for which we are not able to bill on a progress basis are components of “Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts” on our condensed balance sheets and represent the aggregate costs and related earnings for uncompleted contracts for which the customer has not yet been billed. These costs and earnings are recovered upon shipment of products and presentation of billings in accordance with contract terms.
Because the POC method of accounting requires us to use estimates in determining revenue, costs and profits and in assigning the amounts to accounting periods, there can be a significant disparity between earnings (both for accounting and tax purposes) as reported and actual cash that we receive during any reporting period. Accordingly, it is possible that we may have a shortfall in our cash flow and may need to borrow money, or to raise additional capital, until the reported earnings materialize into actual cash receipts.
At June 30, 2012, we had a cash balance of $3,604,047 compared to $878,200 at December 31, 2011.
Our costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings increased by approximately $9.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2012. The Boeing A-10 contract accounted for approximately $4.6 million of this increase. Although this contract does provide for milestone billings, the Company has been limited in its ability to invoice Boeing because of the lack of performance by certain vendors. This has resulted in us not achieving certain milestone billing events. Additionally, Boeing has made engineering changes to parts under contract with us. We have not yet completed pricing negotiations related to these changes. We are contractually obligated to continue production on these parts, however we are not able to invoice for the expected full value until price negotiations are completed. Lastly, a significant amount of production has been completed, however such items can’t be shipped and invoiced, as we are awaiting a further Boeing configuration change.
Because of our high growth rate, in order to perform on new programs, such as the recently announced Goodrich and Embraer programs, we may be required to expend up-front costs that may have to be amortized over a portion of production units. In the case of significant program delays and/or program cancellations, we could be required to bear impairment charges which may be material, for costs that are not recoverable. Such charges and the loss of up-front costs could have a material impact on our liquidity and results of operations.
We continue to work to obtain better payment terms with our customers, including accelerated progress payment arrangements, as well as exploring alternative funding sources.
Item2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Credit Facilities
Line of Credit
In August 2007, we entered into a revolving credit facility with Sovereign Bank (the “Sovereign Revolving Facility”), secured by all of our assets.
On May 26, 2010, the Company entered into a third amendment to its credit agreement with Sovereign Bank increasing the existing revolving credit facility under the Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) from an aggregate of $3.5 to an aggregate of $4.0 and extending the term of the revolving credit facility from August 2011 to August 2013. In addition, the interest rate on borrowings under the revolving credit facility was decreased to (i) the greater of 3.75% or 3.25% in excess of the LIBOR Rate or (ii) the greater of 3.75% or 0.50% in excess of Sovereign Bank’s prime rate, as elected by the Company in accordance with the Credit Agreement.
On May 10, 2011, the Company entered into a fifth amendment to its credit agreement with Sovereign Bank, increasing the existing revolving credit facility from an aggregate of $4.0 million to an aggregate of $10.0 million and extending the term from August 2013 to August 2014. In addition, the interest rate of borrowings under the revolving credit facility will no longer be subject to a minimum rate of 3.75%.
On September 1, 2011, the Company entered into a sixth amendment to its credit agreement with Sovereign Bank providing for a $3.0 million increase until November 30, 2011 of the existing revolving credit facility under the Credit Agreement, from an aggregate of $10.0 million to an aggregate of $13.0 million.
On November 29, 2011, the Company entered into a seventh amendment to the Sovereign Revolving Facility which increased the existing revolving credit facility from an aggregate of $13.0 million to an aggregate of $18.0 million and extended the term of earlier terminating revolving credit loans to August 2014. The Amendment also provides for a reduction in the interest rate of borrowings under the revolving credit facility to 2.75% in excess of the LIBOR rate or Sovereign Bank’s prime rate, as elected by the Company in accordance with the Credit Agreement, a reduction in the commitment fee to a rate of 0.4% per annum on the average daily unused portion of the revolving credit commitment, commencing December 31, 2011 and the addition of a covenant to the Credit Agreement requiring that the Company maintain a ratio of Unsubordinated Liabilities to Capital Base, as such terms are defined in the Credit Agreement.
As of June 30, 2012, we were in compliance with all of the financial covenants contained in the Credit Agreement, as amended, and $14.6 million was outstanding under the Sovereign Revolving Facility.
Term Loan
On October 22, 2008, we obtained a $3.0 million term loan from Sovereign Bank to be amortized over five years (the “Sovereign Term Facility”). The Sovereign Term Facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.5% and is secured by all of our assets.
The terms and conditions of the Sovereign Revolving Facility are applicable to the Sovereign Term Facility.
Additionally, the Company and Sovereign Bank entered into a five-year interest rate swap agreement, in the notional amount of $3.0 million. Under the interest rate swap, the Company pays an amount to Sovereign Bank representing interest on the notional amount of 5.8% and receives an amount from Sovereign representing interest on the notional amount at a rate equal to the one-month LIBOR plus 2.5%. The effect of this interest rate swap will be the Company paying a fixed interest rate of 5.8% over the term of the Sovereign Term Facility.
On March 9, 2012, the Company entered into an eighth amendment to its credit agreement with Sovereign Bank which provides for an additional term loan from Sovereign in the principal amount of $4.5 to be amortized over five years (the “Sovereign Term Facility 2”). The Sovereign Term Facility 2 shall be used by the Company to purchase tooling and equipment in connection with certain contracts. The Sovereign Term Facility 2 is subject to the same acceleration provision as the Revolving Credit Loans and Sovereign Term Facility, which provision allows the Sovereign, at its option, to declare all Loans and other outstanding amounts under the Credit Agreement as due and payable upon the occurrence of any Event of Default. The Amendment also requires a prepayment of the Sovereign Term Facility 2 upon the Company’s receipt of a termination or cancellation payment in connection with the Designated Contracts in an amount equal to the lesser of 50% of such payment or the outstanding principal balance of the Sovereign Term Facility 2.
Pursuant to the terms of the ISDA 2002 Master Agreement and Schedule between Sovereign and the Company, dated October 22, 2008, the Registrant also entered into a five-year interest rate swap agreement in the notional amount of $4.5 million. Under the Interest Rate Swap, the Company pays an amount to the Sovereign representing interest on the notional amount at a fixed rate of 4.11% and receives an amount from Sovereign representing interest on the notional amount at a rate equal to the one month LIBOR rate plus 300 basis points. The effect of this Interest Rate Swap will be the Company paying a fixed interest rate of 4.11% over the term of the Sovereign Term Facility 2.
Contractual Obligations
For information concerning our contractual obligations, see “Contractual Obligations” under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011
Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. We are exposed to market risk primarily due to fluctuations in the interest rates.
Item 4 – Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s management has established disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information it is required to disclose in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. Such disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information the Company is required to disclose in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Based on an evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2012 made by management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act) were effective as of June 30, 2012.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2012 that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
Part II: Other Information
Item 1 – Legal Proceedings
None.
There have been no material changes to the risk factors as previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.
Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3 – Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4 – Mine Safety Discosures
Not applicable.
Item 5 – Other Information
None.
Exhibit 31.1
|
Section 302 Certification by Chief Executive Officer and President
|
Exhibit 31.2
|
Section 302 Certification by Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
|
Exhibit 32
|
Section 906 Certification by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|
Exhibit 101
|
The following financial information from CPI Aerostructures, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Balance Sheet, (ii) the Condensed Statements of Income, (iii) the Condensed Statement of Shareholders' Equity, (iv) the Condensed Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) the Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
CPI AEROSTRUCTURES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 9, 2012
|
By.
|
/s/ Edward J. Fred
|
|
|
Edward J. Fred
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 9, 2012
|
By.
|
/s/ Vincent Palazzolo
|
|
|
Vincent Palazzolo
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
|