e424b3
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration No. 333-124748
August 17, 2005
To the Shareholders of The Keith Companies, Inc.:
You are cordially invited to attend a special meeting of the
shareholders of The Keith Companies, Inc. to approve the merger
of The Keith Companies, Inc. and Stantec Consulting California
Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Stantec Inc. Your board of
directors has unanimously approved a merger agreement that will
have the effect of combining the businesses of Keith and
Stantec. Your board of directors believes that the merger will
benefit you as a shareholder of Keith and asks for your support
in voting to approve the merger agreement at the special meeting
of Keiths shareholders to be held at 9:00 a.m.
Pacific Time, on September 15, 2005 at 19 Technology
Drive, Irvine, California 92618.
In the proposed merger, Keith will be merged with and into
Stantec Consulting California Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Stantec, with Stantec Consulting California Inc. being the
surviving company. If the merger agreement is approved and the
merger is consummated, each share of Keith common stock will be
converted into the right to receive (1) US$11.00 in cash,
(2) 0.23 common shares of Stantec and (3) that number
of Stantec common shares equal to US$5.50, based on the trading
prices of Stantec shares for 20 trading days prior to the merger
and then prevailing currency exchange rates. Based on the
closing sale price of Stantec common shares and the U.S.
dollar-Canadian dollar exchange rate as of August 15, 2005,
0.23 Stantec common shares had a value of approximately US$7.38
and US$5.50 equaled approximately 0.17 Stantec common shares.
You will have the right to select the form of merger
consideration you receive by electing (A) a mix of cash and
Stantec common shares, as described above, (B) all Stantec
common shares or (C) all cash, subject to pro rata
adjustment in the case of (B) and (C) if one of these
options is oversubscribed. Based on the closing sale price of
Stantec common shares and the U.S. dollar-Canadian dollar
exchange rate as of August 15, 2005, for each share of
Keith common stock a holder who elects to receive (A) a mix
of cash and Stantec common shares will receive US$11.00 and
approximately 0.40 Stantec common shares, (B) all
Stantec common shares will receive approximately
0.74 Stantec common shares and (C) all cash will
receive approximately US$23.88, subject to pro rata adjustment
in the case of (B) and (C). Fractional shares will not be
issued, but a cash payment will be made for those fractional
shares. Upon consummation of the merger, Keiths
shareholders will own approximately 17% of the outstanding
Stantec common shares.
If the merger does not qualify as a tax-free reorganization
under Section 368(a) of the United States Internal Revenue
Code, Stantec has the option, at its discretion, to complete the
merger by paying cash merger consideration of US$22.00 per share.
KEITHS BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS APPROVED THE MERGER AND
UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS OF KEITH VOTE
FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND ITS
TERMS.
Approval of the merger agreement and adjournment of the special
meeting requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least
a majority of Keiths outstanding common stock.
Attached to this letter is an important document providing
detailed information concerning Stantec, Keith, the merger and a
more thorough explanation of Keiths board of
directors view of the merger, as well as other matters
related to the special meeting.
PLEASE READ THIS DOCUMENT CAREFULLY, INCLUDING THE
SECTION DESCRIBING RISK FACTORS BEGINNING ON
PAGE 16.
IT IS IMPORTANT TO VOTE YOUR SHARES, IN PERSON OR BY PROXY,
BECAUSE THE FAILURE TO VOTE WILL HAVE THE SAME EFFECT AS A VOTE
AGAINST THE MERGER. Whether or not you plan to attend the
special meeting, please submit your proxy promptly by
completing, dating and returning your proxy card in the enclosed
envelope. Returning the proxy card does not deprive you of your
right to attend the special meeting and vote in person.
|
|
|
We look forward to your support. |
|
Sincerely, |
|
|
|
|
|
Aram H. Keith |
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
or Canadian provincial or territorial securities regulatory
authority has approved or disapproved the securities to be
issued in connection with the merger or determined if this proxy
statement/prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation
to the contrary is a criminal offense.
This proxy statement/prospectus is dated August 17, 2005
and is expected to be first mailed to shareholders of Keith on
or about that date.
THE KEITH COMPANIES, INC.
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 15, 2005
TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF THE KEITH COMPANIES, INC.:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting of shareholders of
The Keith Companies, Inc. will be held at 9:00 a.m. Pacific
Time, on September 15, 2005 at 19 Technology Drive, Irvine,
California 92618, for the following purposes of voting on:
|
|
|
(1) the approval of the Agreement and Plan of Merger and
Reorganization, dated as of April 14, 2005, as amended
May 9, 2005, among Stantec Inc., Keith and Stantec
Consulting California Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Stantec, a copy of which is attached as Appendix A to the
enclosed proxy statement/prospectus; and |
|
|
(2) to transact such other business as may properly come
before the special meeting, including authority to adjourn or
postpone the special meeting to another time and place for the
purpose of soliciting additional proxies. |
Only shareholders of record at the close of business on
August 11, 2005 are entitled to notice of and to vote at
the special meeting and any adjournments or postponements
thereof.
KEITHS BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT
YOU VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE MERGER
AGREEMENT AND ITS TERMS.
Dissenters rights may be available under Chapter 13
of the California Corporations Code for the shareholders of
Keith in connection with the merger. In order to exercise
dissenters rights, Keith shareholders must deliver a
written demand to Keith no later than the date of the special
meeting and must vote against approval of the merger
proposal. A copy of the applicable California statutory
provisions is included as Appendix D to the attached proxy
statement/prospectus and a summary of these provisions can be
found under The Merger Dissenters
Rights in the attached proxy statement/prospectus.
The merger of Keith and Stantec Consulting California Inc. is
more fully described in the proxy statement/prospectus
accompanying this notice. You are encouraged to carefully read
the proxy statement/prospectus and the attached annexes.
Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting, we
encourage you to read the proxy statement/prospectus and submit
your proxy as soon as possible. It is important that your shares
be represented at the special meeting. A FAILURE TO VOTE HAS THE
SAME EFFECT AS VOTING AGAINST THE MERGER. Whether or not you
plan to attend the special meeting, please submit your proxy
promptly by completing, dating and returning your proxy card in
the enclosed envelope. You may revoke your proxy at any time
until it is voted by a later dated proxy or by attending the
special meeting and voting in person.
Please do not send any stock certificates you may have at
this time.
Our principal executive offices are located at 19 Technology
Drive, Irvine, California 92618. Our telephone number is
(949) 923-6001.
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary C. Campanaro |
|
Secretary |
August 17, 2005
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
Additional Information
|
|
|
1 |
|
Presentation of Financial and Other Information
|
|
|
2 |
|
Exchange Rate Data
|
|
|
2 |
|
Questions and Answers About the Merger
|
|
|
3 |
|
Summary
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
The Companies
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
Comparative Per Share Market Price and Exchange Rate Data
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
The Merger
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
The Special Meeting
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
The Merger Agreement
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
Other Agreements
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
Recommendation of Keiths Board of Directors
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
Opinion of Keiths Financial Advisor
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
Interests of Keith and Stantec Executive Officers and Directors
in the Merger
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Material Canadian Federal Income Tax Consequences
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
Accounting Treatment of the Merger
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
Regulatory Matters Related to the Merger
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
No Solicitation
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
Conditions to the Merger
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
Termination Fee
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
Comparison of Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
15 |
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
16 |
|
Forward-Looking Statements
|
|
|
28 |
|
Selected Historical and Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Data of
Stantec Inc.
|
|
|
30 |
|
Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data of The Keith
Companies, Inc.
|
|
|
31 |
|
Comparative Per Share Data
|
|
|
32 |
|
Dividends
|
|
|
33 |
|
Comparative Per Share Market Price
|
|
|
33 |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of the Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of Stantec
|
|
|
35 |
|
Description of Stantecs Business
|
|
|
51 |
|
Management of Stantec
|
|
|
60 |
|
Information Concerning the Special Meeting
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
Keith Special Meeting
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
Date, Time and Place
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
Purpose of the Special Meeting
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
Record Date; Voting Power
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
Required Vote; Quorum; How to Vote
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
Revocation of Proxy
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
Expenses of Solicitation
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
Exchange of Share Certificates
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
Questions About Voting Your Shares
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
73 |
|
The Merger
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
Background of The Merger
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
Recommendation of the Keith Board of Directors
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
Reasons for Keiths Board Recommendation
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
Opinion of Keiths Financial Advisor
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
Reasons for Stantecs Board Recommendation
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
Interests of Keiths and Stantecs Executive Officers
and Directors in the Merger
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
Material Canadian Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
Anticipated Accounting Treatment
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
Regulatory Matters Related to the Merger
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Merger Fees, Costs and Expenses
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Dissenters Rights
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Stock Exchange Listing
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
Resale of Stantec Common Shares
|
|
|
102 |
|
The Merger Agreement
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
Structure of the Merger
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
Effective Time and Closing of the Merger
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
Surviving Corporation Governing Documents, Officers and Directors
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
Representations and Warranties
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
Conduct of Business Pending the Merger
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
Additional Agreements
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
Conditions to the Merger
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
Termination, Amendment and Waiver
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
General Provisions
|
|
|
111 |
|
Other Agreements
|
|
|
112 |
|
Beneficial Ownership of Securities
|
|
|
113 |
|
Description Of Stantec Share Capital
|
|
|
114 |
|
Comparison of Shareholders Rights
|
|
|
115 |
|
Experts
|
|
|
128 |
|
Legal Matters
|
|
|
129 |
|
Shareholder Proposals
|
|
|
129 |
|
Enforceability of Civil Liabilities
|
|
|
129 |
|
Where You Can Find More Information
|
|
|
130 |
|
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-1 |
|
Appendix A Agreement and Plan of Merger and
Reorganization
|
|
|
A-1 |
|
Appendix B Opinion of Bear, Stearns & Co.
Inc.
|
|
|
B-1 |
|
Appendix C Stockholders Support Agreement
|
|
|
C-1 |
|
Appendix D Dissenters Rights and Procedures
|
|
|
D-1 |
|
Additional Information
This proxy statement/prospectus incorporates important business
and financial information about Keith from documents that are
not included in or delivered with this document. This
information is available to you without charge upon your written
or oral request. You can obtain documents related to Keith that
are incorporated by reference in this document, without charge,
by requesting them in writing or by telephone from any of:
|
|
|
|
|
The Keith Companies, Inc.
19 Technology Drive
Irvine, California, USA 92618-2334
Phone: (949) 923-6001
Attention: Investor Relations |
|
Stantec Inc.
10160-112 Street
Edmonton, Canada, T5K 2L6
Phone: (780) 917-7000
Attention: Investor Relations |
|
The Altman Group, Inc.
1275 Valley Brook Avenue
Lyndhurst, NJ 07071
Phone: (201) 806-2205
Attention: Charlotte Brown |
For information on where to obtain copies of such documents on
the internet, see Where You Can Find More
Information elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus.
Please note that copies of the documents provided to you will
not include exhibits, unless the exhibits are specifically
incorporated by reference into the documents or this proxy
statement/prospectus.
To obtain timely delivery, security holders must request this
information no later than five business days before the date
they must make their investment decision. In order to receive
timely delivery of requested documents in advance of the special
meeting, you should make your request no later than
September 6, 2005.
For information on submitting your proxy, please refer to the
instructions on the enclosed proxy card.
Presentation of Financial and Other Information
The historical consolidated financial data of Stantec Inc.
contained in this proxy statement/ prospectus are reported in
Canadian dollars and have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in Canada, or
Canadian GAAP. Canadian GAAP differs in some material
respects from United States generally accepted accounting
principles, or U.S. GAAP, and so this financial data may
not be comparable to the financial data of U.S. companies. For a
discussion of the differences between Canadian GAAP and
U.S. GAAP as they relate to Stantec, see note 21 to
Stantecs audited consolidated financial statements, which
are included elsewhere in this proxy statement/ prospectus.
The consolidated financial data of The Keith Companies, Inc.
included and/ or incorporated by reference in this proxy
statement/ prospectus are reported in U.S. dollars and have
been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires, all
references in this proxy statement/ prospectus
to C$ are to Canadian dollars and all
references to US$ or
U.S. dollars are to United States dollars.
Exchange Rate Data
The following tables set forth certain exchange rates based on
the inverse of the noon buying rate in the city of New York
for cable transfers in Canadian dollars as certified for
customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
On August 15, 2005 the inverse of the noon buying rate
was C$1.00 equals US$0.8285.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Average(1)
|
|
US$ |
0.6725 |
|
|
US$ |
0.6443 |
|
|
US$ |
0.6368 |
|
|
US$ |
0.7186 |
|
|
US$ |
0.7701 |
|
|
US$ |
0.8095 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month
during the year or quarter indicated. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Feb. 2005 | |
|
March 2005 | |
|
April 2005 | |
|
May 2005 | |
|
June 2005 | |
|
July 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
High
|
|
US$ |
0.8134 |
|
|
US$ |
0.8322 |
|
|
US$ |
0.8233 |
|
|
US$ |
0.8082 |
|
|
US$ |
0.8159 |
|
|
US$ |
0.8300 |
|
Low
|
|
US$ |
0.7962 |
|
|
US$ |
0.8024 |
|
|
US$ |
0.7957 |
|
|
US$ |
0.7872 |
|
|
US$ |
0.7950 |
|
|
US$ |
0.8041 |
|
2
Questions and Answers About the Merger
The following questions and answers are intended to address
briefly some commonly asked questions regarding the special
meeting and the merger. These questions and answers may not
address all questions that may be important to you as a Keith
shareholder. Please refer to the more detailed information
contained elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus and the
appendixes attached to this proxy statement/prospectus.
Unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires,
all references in this proxy statement/prospectus to
Stantec, we, us, and
our are to Stantec Inc. and its subsidiaries; all
references to Keith are to The Keith Companies, Inc.
and its subsidiaries and all references to Stantec Consulting
are to Stantec Consulting California Inc.
|
|
Q1: |
What am I being asked to vote on? |
|
|
A1: |
You are being asked to vote to approve the Agreement and Plan of
Merger and Reorganization and its terms, which is referred to in
this proxy statement/prospectus as the merger agreement, dated
as of April 14, 2005, as amended May 9, 2005, among
Stantec, Keith and Stantec Consulting, a newly formed,
wholly-owned subsidiary of Stantec. If the merger is completed,
Keith will no longer be a public company. |
|
|
Q2: |
What consideration will be paid in connection with merger? |
|
|
A2: |
The merger consideration to be paid by Stantec includes a fixed
amount of cash equal to US$11.00 per share of Keith common
stock, as well as Stantec common shares, which as of
August 15, 2005, had a value of approximately US$12.88. The
number of shares that Stantec will issue as merger consideration
is partly fixed and partly variable. The fixed component is
equal to 0.23 Stantec common shares per share of Keith common
stock. The variable component is equal to an amount of Stantec
common shares equal to US$5.50 per share of Keith common stock,
based on the 20-day average trading price of Stantec common
shares prior to the merger. As a consequence, the actual number
of Stantec common shares that will be issued in the merger and
that you may receive as merger consideration is not known at
this time. Based on the closing sale price of Stantec common
shares and the U.S. dollar-Canadian dollar exchange rate as of
August 15, 2005, 0.23 Stantec common shares had a value of
approximately US$7.38 and US$5.50 equaled approximately
0.17 Stantec common shares. |
|
|
|
The 20-day average trading price of Stantec common shares means
the simple average of the daily weighted average sales price of
Stantec common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange, as reported
by Bloomberg L.P., for each of the 20 consecutive trading days
ending on, and including, the second trading day prior to the
merger. The weighted average sales price for each trading day is
converted from Canadian dollars to U.S. dollars at the inverse
of the noon buying rate quoted by the Federal Reserve Bank of
New York on such trading day. |
|
|
Q3: |
What will I receive in the merger? |
|
|
A3: |
You will have the right to select the form of merger
consideration you will receive by electing one of the following
options: |
|
|
|
Option 1: a mix of cash and Stantec common shares; |
|
|
Option 2: all Stantec common shares; or |
|
|
Option 3: all cash. |
|
|
Because Stantec will pay a fixed amount of cash and will issue a
specific amount of shares in connection with the merger, the
actual consideration you will receive will not be known until
after all |
3
|
|
|
shareholder elections have been made. Once all elections have
been made, the following procedure will be used to determine the
actual form of merger consideration that you will receive: |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
If you elect Option 1 (a mix of cash and Stantec common shares),
you will receive US$11.00 and the amount of Stantec common
shares described in answer 2 above, regardless of the number of
Keith shareholders that elect this option. |
|
|
(2) |
If you elect Option 2 (all Stantec common shares) you will
receive 0.23 Stantec common shares per share of Keith common
stock plus a variable amount of Stantec common shares equal to
US$16.50 per share of Keith common stock, based on the 20-day
average trading price of Stantec common shares. However, if the
number of Stantec common shares that Keith shareholders elect to
receive is greater than the total number of Stantec common
shares that Stantec is required to issue, then you will receive
a proportionate allocation of Stantec common shares and cash
based on the formula set out in Section 2.01(e) of the merger
agreement. |
|
|
(3) |
If you elect Option 3 (all cash) you will receive US$16.50 cash
plus cash equal to the value of 0.23 Stantec common shares,
based on the 20-day average trading price of Stantec common
shares. However, if the amount of cash that Keith shareholders
elect to receive is greater than the total amount of cash that
Stantec is required to pay, then you will receive a
proportionate allocation of cash and Stantec common shares based
on the formula set out in Section 2.01(f) of the merger
agreement. |
|
|
|
Based on the closing sale price of Stantec common shares and the
U.S. dollar-Canadian dollar exchange rate as of August 15,
2005, for each share of Keith common stock a holder who elects
to receive (1) a mix of cash and Stantec common shares will
receive US$11.00 and approximately 0.40 Stantec common
shares, (2) all Stantec common shares will receive
approximately 0.74 Stantec common shares and (3) all
cash will receive approximately US$23.88, subject to pro rata
adjustment in the case of (2) and (3). |
|
|
If you do not make an election, you will be deemed to have
elected, and will receive, Option 1, a mix of cash and Stantec
common shares. |
|
|
You will not receive any fractional Stantec common shares in the
merger. Instead, Stantec will pay you cash for any fractional
Stantec common share you would have otherwise received, taking
into account all shares of Keith common stock you own. |
|
|
If, for some reason, the merger would not qualify as a tax-free
reorganization under the provisions of Section 368(a) of
the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
referred to in this proxy statement/prospectus as the Code,
Stantec has the option, at its sole discretion, to complete the
merger by paying cash merger consideration of US$22.00 per share
of Keith common stock rather than the merger consideration
described above. In such circumstances, you would receive
US$22.00 in cash for each and every share of Keith common stock
you own. In the event that Stantec exercises this option, Keith
and Stantec will recirculate a revised proxy statement/
prospectus and resolicit the vote of Keith shareholders to
approve the merger. If the merger does not qualify as a tax-free
reorganization and Stantec does not exercise its option to pay
all cash, Keith will not be obligated to consummate the merger.
Furthermore, in such situation Stantec and Keith will not
consummate the merger without recirculating a revised proxy
statement/ prospectus and resoliciting the vote of Keith
shareholders to approve the merger. |
|
|
Q4: |
How does the Keith board of directors recommend that I
vote? |
|
|
A4: |
The Keith board of directors unanimously recommends that you
vote FOR approval of the merger agreement and
its terms. |
4
|
|
Q5: |
Why is the Board of Directors recommending that I vote for
approval of the merger agreement? |
|
|
A5: |
The board of directors of Keith believes the merger
consideration is fair and that the merger is in the best
interests of Keith stockholders. For a more detailed explanation
of the beliefs of the board of directors of Keith, see The
Merger Keiths Reasons for the Merger. |
|
|
Q6: |
What vote of Keiths shareholders and what vote of
Stantec shareholders is required in connection with the
merger? |
|
|
A6: |
Approval of the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote
of the holders of at least a majority of Keiths
outstanding common stock. Aram H. Keith, Margie R. Keith and The
Aram H. Keith and Margie R. Keith Revocable Trust entered into a
Stockholders Support Agreement pursuant to which the
shareholders granted Stantec an irrevocable proxy to vote their
shares of Keith common stock, representing approximately 16% of
the outstanding shares of Keith common stock, in favor of the
merger. No vote of Stantec shareholders is required (or will be
sought) in connection with the merger. |
|
|
Q7: |
What happens if I do not vote? |
|
|
A7: |
IF YOU DO NOT VOTE YOUR SHARES, THAT WILL BE THE EQUIVALENT OF A
VOTE AGAINST APPROVAL OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND, THEREFORE,
WILL BE THE SAME AS A VOTE AGAINST THE MERGER. |
|
|
Q8: |
When do you expect the merger to be completed? |
|
|
A8: |
We expect to complete the merger as promptly as practicable
after we receive approval of Keith shareholders at the special
meeting. We currently anticipate closing the transaction in the
third calendar quarter of 2005. |
|
|
Q9: |
What do I need to do now? |
|
|
A9: |
After carefully reading and considering the information
contained in the proxy statement/prospectus, please fill out,
sign and date the proxy card, and then mail your signed proxy
card in the enclosed prepaid envelope as soon as possible so
that your shares may be voted at the special meeting. |
|
|
Q10: |
If my shares are held in street name by my
broker, will my broker vote my shares for me? |
|
|
A10: |
You should instruct your broker to vote your shares. Please
check with your broker and follow the voting procedures your
broker provides. Your broker will advise you whether you may
submit voting instructions by telephone or internet. If you do
not instruct your broker, your broker will generally not have
the discretion to vote your shares without your instructions.
Because approval of the merger agreement requires an affirmative
vote of the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding
shares of Keith common stock, these so-called broker
non-votes, where the broker does not vote for or against
approval of the merger agreement, have the same effect as votes
cast against approval of the merger agreement. See The
Special Meeting Required Vote; Quorum; How to
Vote. |
|
|
Q11: |
May I change my vote after I have mailed my signed proxy
card? |
|
|
A11: |
Yes. You may change your vote at any time before your proxy is
voted at the special meeting. You can do this in several ways.
You can send a written notice stating that you want to revoke
your proxy, or you can complete and submit a new proxy card. If
you choose either of these methods, you must submit your notice
of revocation or your new proxy card to: |
|
|
|
The Altman Group, Inc.
1275 Valley Brook Avenue
Lyndhurst, NJ 07071
Phone: (201) 806-2205
Attention: Charlotte Brown |
5
|
|
|
You can also attend the special meeting and vote in person.
Simply attending the special meeting, however, will not revoke
your proxy; you must vote at the special meeting. |
|
|
If you have instructed a broker to vote your shares, you must
follow the voting procedures received from your broker to change
your vote. |
|
|
Q12: |
If I want to attend the special meeting, what do I do? |
|
|
A12: |
You must come to 19 Technology Drive, Irvine, California 92618,
at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time, on September 15, 2005. |
|
|
Q13: |
Should I send in my stock certificates now? |
|
|
A13: |
No. If the merger is completed and you hold any Keith stock
certificates, you will receive written instructions for
exchanging those Keith stock certificates for the merger
consideration. You may not have received any stock certificates
because your shares of Keith common stock were directly
registered. The written instructions you will receive will
advise you what to do if your shares were directly registered. |
|
|
Q14: |
What if I cannot find my stock certificate? |
|
|
A14: |
There will be a procedure for you to elect to receive your
merger consideration even if you lost one or more of your Keith
stock certificates. This procedure, however, may take time to
complete. In order to ensure that you will be able to receive
your merger consideration promptly after the merger is
completed, if you cannot locate your Keith stock certificates
after looking for them carefully, we urge you to contact
Keiths transfer agent, U.S. Stock Transfer Corporation, as
soon as possible and follow the procedure for replacing your
Keiths stock certificates. U.S. Stock Transfer
Corporation, can be reached at 1-800-835-8778, or you can write
to U.S. Stock Transfer Corporation at the following address:
1745 Gardena Avenue, Glendale, CA 91204-2991. |
|
|
Q15: |
Can I dissent and require appraisal of my shares? |
|
|
A15: |
Dissenters rights will be available under Chapter 13
of the California Corporations Code, referred to in this proxy
statement/prospectus as the CCC, for Keith shareholders in
connection with the merger if demands for payment are made with
respect to 5% or more of the outstanding Keith common stock. In
general, to preserve their dissenters rights, Keith
shareholders who wish to exercise these rights must: |
|
|
|
|
|
deliver a written demand to Keith for purchase of their shares
of Keith common stock, which must be received by Keith no later
than the date of the special meeting; |
|
|
|
vote their shares of Keith common stock AGAINST
approval of the merger proposal; |
|
|
|
continuously hold their shares of Keith common stock from the
date they make the demand through the closing of the merger; and |
|
|
|
comply with the other provisions of Chapter 13 of the CCC. |
|
|
|
If, after the effective time of the merger, that shareholder
withdraws or otherwise loses the right to demand purchase of its
shares of Keith common stock, those shares shall be treated as
if they had been converted as of the effective time of the
merger into the right to receive the merger consideration. See
The Merger Dissenters Rights
beginning on page 100. |
|
|
The text of the CCC governing dissenters rights is
attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Appendix D.
Your failure to comply with the procedures described in
Appendix D will result in the loss of your dissenters
rights. |
6
|
|
Q16: |
Are there risks that I should consider in deciding whether to
vote for approval of the merger agreement? |
|
|
A16: |
Yes. We have set forth in the section entitled Risk
Factors beginning on page 16 of this proxy
statement/prospectus a number of risk factors that you should
consider carefully in connection with the merger. |
|
|
Q17: |
Will Keith common stock continue to be traded on the Nasdaq
National Market after the merger is completed? |
|
|
A17: |
No. If the merger is consummated, Keith common stock will
no longer be listed for trading on the Nasdaq National Market.
However, Stantec common shares are listed on the New York Stock
Exchange under the trading symbol SXC. |
|
|
Q18: |
Who can help answer my additional questions about the
merger? |
|
|
A18: |
If you have questions about the merger, you should contact any
of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
The Keith Companies, Inc.
19 Technology Drive
Irvine, California, USA 92618-2334
Phone: (949) 923-6001
Attention: Investor Relations |
|
Stantec Inc.
10160-112 Street
Edmonton, Canada, T5K 2L6
Phone: (780) 917-7000
Attention: Investor Relations |
|
The Altman Group, Inc.
1275 Valley Brook Avenue
Lyndhurst, NJ 07071
Phone: (201) 806-2205
Attention: Charlotte Brown |
7
Summary
This summary highlights selected information from this proxy
statement/ prospectus. It does not contain all of the
information that may be important to you. You should carefully
read this entire proxy statement/ prospectus and the other
documents to which this document refers for a more complete
understanding of the matters being considered at the special
meeting. See Where You Can Find More Information About
Stantec and Keith.
Unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires,
all references to Stantec, we,
us, and our are to Stantec Inc. and its
subsidiaries; all references to Keith are to The
Keith Companies, Inc. and its subsidiaries; all references to
Stantec Consulting are to Stantec Consulting
California Inc.; and all references to merger
agreement are to the Agreement and Plan of Merger and
Reorganization between Stantec, Stantec Consulting and Keith
dated as of April 14, 2005, as amended May 9, 2005.
The Companies
Stantec Inc.
Stantec provides professional consulting services in planning,
engineering, architecture, interior design, landscape
architecture, surveying, environmental sciences project
management and project economics for infrastructure and
facilities projects. Stantec is focused on increasing the size
and profitability of its operations by acquiring professional
consulting firms in Canada, the United States and other
countries and has consummated 18 such acquisitions since the
beginning of 2002.
Stantec provides services to clients in both the public and
private sectors primarily in North America through integrated
and discipline specific consulting and project delivery. Stantec
believes that its organizational structure gives it both the
strength and diversity of a large organization and a strong
regional presence to deliver its services locally.
Stantecs consulting services business unit focuses on
providing total infrastructure solutions targeted to five
practice areas buildings, environment, industrial,
transportation and urban land. Founded in 1954, Stantec
currently has approximately 4,350 employees, of whom
approximately 2,150 are professionals. For the year ended
December 31, 2004, Stantec had gross revenue of
approximately C$520.9 million and net income of
approximately C$30.2 million
Stantec is a Canadian company. Its corporate headquarters are
located at 10160 112 Street, Edmonton,
Alberta, T5K 2L6. Its phone number is (780) 917-7000.
|
|
|
Stantec Consulting California Inc. |
Stantec Consulting California Inc., a California corporation, is
a wholly-owned subsidiary of Stantec that was recently
incorporated solely for the purpose of effecting the merger with
Keith. Since its incorporation, Stantec Consulting has not
carried on any activities, other than in connection with the
offer and the merger.
|
|
|
The Keith Companies, Inc. |
Keith is a full service engineering and consulting services firm
providing professional services on a wide range of projects to
the real estate development, public works/ infrastructure, and
energy/ industrial industries. Keith has a diverse public and
private client base including real estate developers,
residential and commercial builders, architects, cities,
counties, water districts, state and federal agencies,
landowners, commercial retailers, energy providers and various
manufacturers. Its professional staff and project workers
provide a comprehensive menu of services that are needed to
effectively manage, engineer and design infrastructure and
state-of-the-art facilities.
Keith has acquired eight companies since December 1, 1997
and as of January 31, 2005, Keith had approximately
830 employees/ project workers providing engineering and
consulting services from 17 divisions in 7 states:
California, Michigan, Nevada, Texas, Utah, Oregon and Arizona.
In addition, Keith also has the ability to provide start-up,
testing and other energy-related technical consulting services
in Brazil.
Keith is a California corporation. Its corporate headquarters
are located at 19 Technology Drive, Irvine, California
92618. Its phone number is (949) 923-6001.
Comparative Per Share Market Price and Exchange
Rate Data
Stantec common shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange
under the trading symbol STN and on the New York
Stock Exchange under the trading symbol SXC. Keith
common stock is listed on the
8
Nasdaq National Market under the trading symbol
TKCI. Upon completion of the merger, Keith common
stock will no longer trade on the Nasdaq National Market.
The following table sets forth the closing sale prices of
Stantec common shares and Keith common stock as reported on the
Toronto Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq National Market,
respectively, on April 14, 2005, the last trading day
before the public announcement of the merger, and
August 15, 2005 the last practicable trading day before the
distribution of this proxy statement/prospectus. The price of
Stantec common shares has been converted from Canadian dollars
to U.S. dollars at the inverse of the noon buying rate
quoted by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on such trading
day. We urge you to obtain current market quotations for both
the Stantec common shares and the Keith common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stantec | |
|
Keith | |
|
|
Common Shares | |
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
At April 14, 2005
|
|
US$ |
23.15 |
|
|
US$ |
16.85 |
|
At August 17, 2005
|
|
US$ |
32.52 |
|
|
US$ |
23.60 |
|
The Merger
We are proposing a merger of Keith and Stantec Consulting, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Stantec. Following completion of the
merger, Stantec Consulting will continue as the surviving
corporation of the merger and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Stantec. After the merger, Keiths existing shareholders
will own approximately 17% of the outstanding Stantec common
shares (based on 18,937,019 Stantec common shares outstanding as
of April 13, 2005).
Pursuant to the merger agreement attached as Appendix A to
this proxy statement/ prospectus, each share of Keith common
stock will be exchanged for merger consideration equal to:
(1) US$11.00 in cash, (2) 0.23 common shares of
Stantec and (3) that number of Stantec common shares equal
to US$5.50, based on the 20-day average trading price of Stantec
common shares prior to the merger. Based on the closing sale
price of Stantec common shares and the U.S. dollar-Canadian
dollar exchange rate as of August 15, 2005, 0.23 Stantec
common shares had a value of approximately US$7.38 and US$5.50
equaled approximately 0.17 Stantec common shares.
Holders of Keith common stock will have the right to elect to
receive their merger consideration in the form of (A) a
mixture of cash and Stantec common shares, as described above,
(B) all Stantec common shares or (C) all cash, subject
in the case of (B) and (C) to pro rata adjustment if
the amount of Stantec common shares or cash is oversubscribed.
Based on the closing sale price of Stantec common shares and the
U.S. dollar-Canadian dollar exchange rate as of
August 15, 2005, for each share of Keith common stock a
holder who elects to receive (A) a mix of cash and Stantec
common shares will receive US$11.00 and approximately
0.40 Stantec common shares, (B) all Stantec common
shares will receive approximately 0.74 Stantec common
shares and (C) all cash will receive approximately
US$23.88, subject to pro rata adjustment in the case of
(B) and (C).
If the merger will not qualify as a tax-free reorganization
under the provisions of Section 368(a) of the Code, Stantec
has the option, at its sole discretion, to complete the merger
by paying cash merger consideration of US$22.00 per share of
Keith common stock rather than the merger consideration
described above. In such circumstances, you would receive
US$22.00 in cash for each and every share of Keith common stock
you own. In the event that Stantec exercises this option, Keith
and Stantec will recirculate a revised proxy
statement/prospectus and resolicit the vote of Keith
shareholders to approve the merger. If the merger does not
qualify as a tax-free reorganization and Stantec does not
exercise its option to pay all cash, Keith will not be obligated
to consummate the merger. Furthermore, in such situation,
Stantec and Keith will not consummate the merger without
recirculating a revised proxy statement/ prospectus and
resoliciting the vote of Keith shareholders to approve the
merger.
The Special Meeting
When and Where. The special meeting will be held at
9:00 a.m. Pacific Time on September 15, 2005 at
Keiths corporate headquarters, 19 Technology Drive,
Irvine, California 92618.
Purpose of the Special Meeting. The purpose of the
special meeting is to vote upon approval of the merger agreement.
9
Record Date; Voting Power. Only holders of Keith common
stock as of the close of business on August 11, 2005, the
record date, are entitled to vote at the special meeting or any
adjournment or postponement of the special meeting. Each share
of Keith common stock is entitled to one vote. The holders of
Keith options do not have voting rights and will not be entitled
to vote at the special meeting.
Required Vote. The affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of Keith common stock as of
the record date is required to approve the merger agreement.
Votes may be cast by mailing a signed proxy card or by voting in
person at the special meeting. The failure to vote, or the
abstention from voting, by a shareholder will have the same
effect as a vote against approval of the merger agreement. As of
the record date, 8,016,547 shares of Keith common stock
were outstanding, held by 45 record holders. On the record
date, 17% of the outstanding shares of Keith common stock were
held by directors and executive officers of Keith and their
respective affiliates. All of the Keith directors have indicated
that they intend to vote their Keith shares of common stock in
favor of the approval of the merger agreement. In addition, Aram
H. Keith, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Keith, has
granted his proxy to Stantec to vote his shares of Keith common
stock, representing approximately 16% of the outstanding shares
of Keith common stock, in favor of the merger.
The Merger Agreement
The merger agreement is described beginning on page 103.
The merger agreement is also attached as Appendix A to this
document. We urge you to read the entire document because it is
the legal document governing the merger.
Other Agreements
Concurrently with entering into the merger agreement, Stantec,
Stantec Consulting, Aram H. Keith, Margie R. Keith and The Aram
H. Keith and Margie R. Keith Revocable Trust entered into a
Stockholders Support Agreement pursuant to which the
stockholders granted Stantec an irrevocable proxy to vote their
shares of Keith common stock in favor of the merger. See
Other Agreements Stockholders Support
Agreement.
Stantec and Keith also entered into a Confidentiality Agreement,
dated as of February 18, 2005, containing terms customary
for such confidentiality agreements. See Other
Agreements Confidentiality Agreement.
Stantec and Aram H. Keith entered into a letter agreement, dated
as of April 14, 2005, in which Stantec agreed to cause
Stantec Consulting to make an offer of employment to
Mr. Keith and Mr. Keith agreed, subject to the
satisfaction of certain other conditions, including the receipt
of US$525,000, to terminate his existing change in control
agreement with Keith. See Other Agreements
Letter Agreement.
Recommendation of Keiths Board of Directors
Keiths board of directors has unanimously determined that
the merger agreement and the merger are fair to, and in the best
interests of, Keiths public shareholders, and approved and
declared advisable the merger agreement, the merger and the
other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
KEITHS BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU
VOTE FOR APPROVAL OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND ITS
TERMS.
Opinion of Keiths Financial Advisor
In deciding to approve the merger agreement and the merger,
Keiths board of directors received a written opinion of
Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. delivered to Keiths
board of directors on April 14, 2005 to the effect that, as
of the date of the opinion, based upon and subject to various
considerations and assumptions set forth in the opinion, the
merger consideration to be received by Keiths shareholders
pursuant to the merger agreement is fair from a financial point
of view. The full text of Bear Stearns written opinion is
attached to this proxy statement/ prospectus as Appendix B.
You are encouraged to read this opinion carefully in its
entirety for a description of the assumptions made, procedures
followed, matters considered and limitations on the reviews
undertaken by Bear Stearns.
10
|
|
|
Interests of Keith and Stantec Executive Officers and
Directors in the Merger |
When you consider the Keith board of directors
recommendation to vote in favor of approval of the merger
agreement, you should be aware that Keiths executive
officers and directors may have interests in the merger that may
be different from, or in addition to, the interests of the other
Keith shareholders. Keiths board of directors was aware
that these interests existed when it approved and declared
advisable the merger agreement and determined that the merger
agreement and the merger are fair to, and in the best interests
of, Keith and its shareholders. See The Merger
Interests of Keith and Stantec Executive Officers and Directors
in the Merger.
Aram H. Keith, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Keith, has granted a proxy to Stantec to vote the Keith common
stock held by a trust in which he is one of the trustees, in
favor of the merger agreement. Mr. Keith has also entered
into a letter agreement with Stantec pursuant to which, subject
to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including the receipt
of US$525,000, his change in control agreement with Keith will
terminate and he will become Vice Chairman of Stantec at the
first Stantec board meeting following consummation of the merger.
Gary C. Campanaro, Keiths Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary and a director of Keith, has entered into a separation
agreement with Keith, pursuant to which, upon consummation of
the merger, Mr. Campanaro will be entitled to receive a
payment of US$1.9 million, plus a gross up for excise
taxes, the payment of certain expenses and the vesting of
unvested options and restricted Keith common stock, in full
settlement of Keiths obligations under
Mr. Campanaros change in control agreement with Keith.
Eric C. Nielsen, Keiths President and Chief Operating
Officer, is a party to a change in control agreement with Keith,
which provides for severance payments in certain circumstances
following a change in control of Keith. Mr. Nielsens
employment is expected to continue following the closing of the
merger. If his employment were to terminate following the
closing of the merger, under certain conditions requiring a
severance payment, he would be entitled to a severance payment,
based on his 2005 salary and his 2004 bonus, of approximately
$900,000, plus ancillary benefits.
In addition, pursuant to the merger agreement, prior to closing,
Keith will offer to purchase all unvested options to acquire
Keith common stock, subject to the closing of the merger, for
cash equal to the merger consideration less the exercise price
of such option. Agreements with Messrs. Keith, Nielsen and
Campanaro also provide for the vesting of all unvested options
held by them at the effective time of the merger. Several other
of Keiths executive officers and directors hold unvested
options to purchase Keith common stock, including Thomas Braun,
President of Real Estate Development of Keith, Dean Palumbo,
President of Energy/ Industrial Services of Keith, and Robert
Ohlund, President of Public Works/ Infrastructure Services.
Assuming consideration equal to US$23.88 per unvested option,
less the aggregate exercise price of such unvested options,
officers and directors will receive the following as a result of
the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Value, Net of | |
Name |
|
Unvested Options | |
|
Aggregate Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Aram H. Keith
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
US$ |
445,440 |
|
Eric C. Nielsen
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
US$ |
356,220 |
|
Gary C. Campanaro
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
US$ |
356,220 |
|
Thomas Braun
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
US$ |
62,325 |
|
Dean Palumbo
|
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
US$ |
66,812 |
|
Robert Ohlund
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
US$ |
63,800 |
|
Other board members(1)
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
US$ |
30,210 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes Christine Iger, Edward Muller and George Deukmejian |
11
Vested options to purchase Keith common stock will be cancelled
upon consummation of the merger. It is expected that holders of
such vested options will exercise their vested options prior to
the merger and will receive the merger consideration. Assuming
consideration equal to US$23.88 per vested option, less the
aggregate exercise price of such vested options, officers and
directors will receive the following as a result of the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger Consideration, | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Weighted Average | |
|
Net of Aggregate | |
Name |
|
Vested Options | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Aram H. Keith
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
US$ |
10.96 |
|
|
US$ |
1,033,840 |
|
Eric C. Nielsen
|
|
|
75,556 |
|
|
US$ |
10.23 |
|
|
US$ |
1,031,554 |
|
Gary C. Campanaro
|
|
|
83,982 |
|
|
US$ |
9.14 |
|
|
US$ |
1,237,867 |
|
Thomas Braun
|
|
|
27,740 |
|
|
US$ |
6.55 |
|
|
US$ |
480,781 |
|
Dean Palumbo
|
|
|
13,470 |
|
|
US$ |
9.61 |
|
|
US$ |
192,277 |
|
Other board members(1)
|
|
|
23,814 |
|
|
US$ |
9.78 |
|
|
US$ |
335,722 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes Christine Iger, Edward Muller and George Deukmejian |
Messrs. Nielsen and Campanaro own shares of unvested Keith
restricted stock that will vest upon closing of the merger,
which will result in such shares being converted into a right to
receive the merger consideration. Assuming consideration equal
to US$23.88 per share of restricted common stock,
Messrs. Nielsen and Campanaro will receive the following as
a result of the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares of | |
|
|
|
|
Unvested Keith | |
|
Value of | |
Name |
|
Restricted Stock | |
|
Merger Consideration | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Eric C. Nielsen
|
|
|
10,834 |
|
|
US$ |
258,716 |
|
Gary C. Campanaro
|
|
|
10,834 |
|
|
US$ |
258,716 |
|
Messrs. Braun and Palumbo hold shares of unvested
restricted Keith common stock, which will be converted into
unvested restricted Stantec common shares in connection with the
merger. Based on the closing sale price of Stantec common shares
and the U.S. dollar-Canadian dollar exchange rate as of
August 15, 2005, Messrs. Braun and Palumbo will
receive the following number of unvested restricted Stantec
common shares as a result of the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares of | |
|
Number of | |
|
|
Unvested Keith | |
|
Unvested Restricted | |
|
|
Restricted | |
|
Stantec Common Shares | |
Name |
|
Common Stock | |
|
Received | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Thomas Braun
|
|
|
10,334 |
|
|
|
7,647 |
|
Dean Palumbo
|
|
|
8,167 |
|
|
|
6,043 |
|
In the merger agreement, Stantec has agreed to maintain existing
indemnification arrangements for Keith directors and officers
against certain liabilities arising before and after the merger.
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the merger has been
structured to qualify as a reorganization under the provisions
of Section 368(a) of the Code. Such qualification is
discussed in more detail under Material U.S. Federal
Income Tax Consequences. The exchange of Keith common
stock for solely Stantec common shares in the merger will not
result in the recognition of gain by U.S. Holders (as defined
under Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences)
(except as described under Material U.S. Federal Income
Tax Consequences to the extent the U.S. Holder
receives cash in lieu of fractional Stantec common shares and in
the case of a 5% transferee shareholder who does not enter into
a gain recognition agreement in accordance with
applicable Treasury regulations). It is a condition to the
closing that Stantec and Keith shall have each received opinions
to such effect from Shearman & Sterling LLP and Akin Gump
Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, respectively, which opinions shall
not have been withdrawn or modified in any material respect.
These opinions rely upon certain factual representations made by
Stantec, Keith and Stantec Consulting as of the date of this
proxy statement/ prospectus. The issuance of such opinions is
conditioned upon the receipt by each of Shearman &
Sterling LLP and Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP of
certain
12
additional factual representations to be made by Stantec, Keith
and Stantec Consulting, which representations shall be dated on
or before the date of such opinions and shall not have been
withdrawn or modified in any material respects.
The U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger to a
particular U.S. Holder of Keith common stock will depend on the
form of consideration received by the U.S. Holder in exchange
for its Keith common stock. A U.S. Holder who exchanges
Keith common stock solely for Stantec common shares will not
recognize any gain or loss on the exchange except to the extent
that the U.S. Holder receives cash in lieu of fractional Stantec
common shares. If a U.S. Holder exchanges its Keith common stock
for a combination of Stantec common shares and cash and the U.S.
Holders adjusted tax basis in the Keith common stock
surrendered in the merger is less than the sum of the fair
market value, as of the date of the merger, of the Stantec
common shares and the amount of cash received by the U.S.
Holder, then the U.S. Holder will recognize gain equal to the
lesser of (1) the sum of the amount of cash and the fair
market value, as of the date of the merger, of the Stantec
common shares received by the U.S. Holder minus the adjusted tax
basis of the Keith common stock surrendered therefor or
(2) the amount of cash that the U.S. Holder receives. If a
U.S. Holders adjusted tax basis in the Keith common stock
surrendered in the merger is greater than the sum of the amount
of cash and the fair market value of the Stantec common shares
received in the merger, the U.S. Holder will realize a loss that
is not currently allowed or recognized for U.S. federal income
tax purposes. A U.S. Holder who exchanges Keith common stock
solely for cash in the merger will recognize gain or loss in an
amount equal to the difference between the amount of cash
received and the U.S. Holders adjusted tax basis in the
Keith common stock surrendered in the merger.
Material Canadian Federal Income Tax Consequences
The conversion of Keith common stock into the right to receive
Stantec common shares and cash (including cash instead of
fractional common shares) pursuant to the merger will not, in
general, give rise to Canadian tax for holders of Keith common
stock who are not and who are not deemed to be resident in
Canada. Dividends paid or credited to holders of Stantec common
shares who are not and who are not deemed to be resident in
Canada are subject to a Canadian withholding tax of 25%. Under
the Canada-United States Income Tax Convention (1980), referred
to in this proxy statement/ prospectus as the Convention, the
rate of that withholding tax is generally reduced to 15% for
holders resident in the United States. Assuming that Stantec
common shares are not taxable Canadian property, any
capital gain realized on a disposition of those shares by
holders who are not and who are not deemed to be resident in
Canada will not be subject to tax in Canada. The Stantec common
shares will generally not constitute taxable Canadian
property to a non-resident of Canada if, at the time of
disposition of such shares, the Stantec common shares are listed
on a prescribed stock exchange (which includes the Toronto Stock
Exchange, the New York Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq National
Market) and the holder, persons with whom the holder does not
deal at arms length or the holder together with those
persons does not own and has not, at all times during the
60-month period immediately preceding the disposition, owned 25%
or more of the issued shares of any class or any series of
shares of Stantec.
Accounting Treatment of the Merger
Stantec will account for the merger as a purchase for financial
reporting purposes under Canadian and U.S. GAAP.
Regulatory Matters Related to the Merger
U.S. Antitrust Laws. The Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust
Improvements Act of 1976, referred to in this proxy statement/
prospectus as the HSR Act, prohibits Stantec and Keith from
completing the merger until each of them notifies and furnishes
required information to the Antitrust Division of the U.S.
Department of Justice and to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission,
and the required waiting period has expired or been earlier
terminated. Each of Stantec and Keith filed a pre-merger
notification form under the HSR Act. Early termination of the
waiting period was granted effective May 20, 2005.
13
No Solicitation
Subject to specified legal and fiduciary exceptions, the merger
agreement precludes Keith or any of its affiliates, whether
directly or indirectly, from initiating, soliciting or
encouraging any proposals for, entering into any agreement in
connection with, or participating in any discussions or
negotiations regarding, any third party proposal relating to
(1) any merger, consolidation, share exchange, business
combination, recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution or other
similar transaction involving Keith or any subsidiary;
(2) any sale, lease, exchange, transfer or other
disposition of assets or businesses that constitute or represent
15% or more of the total revenue, operating income, EBITDA or
assets of Keith and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole;
(3) any sale, exchange, transfer or other disposition of
15% or more of any class of equity securities of Keith or of any
significant subsidiary (as defined in Rule 1-02 of
Regulation S-X under the Securities Act); (4) any
tender offer or exchange offer that, if consummated, would
result in any person beneficially owning 15% or more of any
class of equity securities of Keith or of any significant
subsidiary; (5) any solicitation in opposition to approval
of this Agreement by Keiths stockholders; or (6) any
other transaction the consummation of which would reasonably be
expected to prevent or materially delay the merger.
Conditions to the Merger
The respective obligations of each of Stantec and Keith to
effect the merger are conditioned upon the satisfaction of the
following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
Keiths shareholders having affirmatively voted to approve
the merger agreement by the requisite vote; |
|
|
|
the Toronto Stock Exchange having approved the listing of the
Stantec common shares to be issued in connection with the merger
(Stantec has received conditional approval to list such Stantec
common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange); |
|
|
|
the registration statement of which this proxy statement/
prospectus is a part having been declared effective under the
Securities Act of 1933, and no stop order or proceeding
seeking a stop order being pending by or before the Securities
and Exchange Commission; and |
|
|
|
no injunction, order or other legal restraint or prohibition
preventing the consummation of the merger being in effect and no
statute, rule, regulation or order by any U.S. or foreign
governmental entity being in effect which makes the consummation
of the merger illegal. |
The obligation of each of Stantec and Keith to effect the merger
is further subject to the satisfaction (or waiver) of the
following additional conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
the other party having performed in all material respects its
obligations under the merger agreement and its representations
and warranties in the merger agreement being true and correct as
of the closing of the merger, except for failures to be true and
correct that would not reasonably be expected to have a material
adverse effect (as defined in the merger agreement); |
|
|
|
there shall not have been a material adverse change in the
business of the other party since the date of the merger
agreement; |
|
|
|
the other party shall have delivered an officers
certificate attesting to compliance of such other party with its
representations, warranties and covenants under the merger
agreement and to the absence of a material adverse change in
such other partys business; and |
|
|
|
each party having received an opinion from its U.S. tax
counsel that: |
|
|
|
|
|
the merger will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning
of Section 368(a) of the Code. |
The obligation of Stantec to effect the merger is further
subject to the satisfaction (or waiver) of the following
additional conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
Keith shall have deposited with the Exchange Agent for the
benefit of the holders of Keith common stock the lesser of
(1) US$18,000,000 and (2) the maximum amount of cash
that would not preclude the merger from qualifying as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code; |
|
|
|
Keith shall have at least US$40,000,000 of cash or cash
equivalents, less the amount of cash deposited with the Exchange
Agent; |
|
|
|
the number of dissenting shares shall be less than 5% of
the issued and outstanding shares of Keith common stock; and |
14
Termination
Stantec and Keith can mutually agree to terminate the merger
agreement prior to the effective time of the merger. Also,
either party may terminate the merger agreement without the
consent of the other if:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger is not consummated by December 31, 2005, unless
the party seeking to terminate the merger agreement has failed
to comply with the merger agreement and that failure has been
the cause of, or resulted in, the failure of the merger to occur
on or before December 31, 2005; |
|
|
|
Keith shareholders fail to adopt the merger agreement at the
special meeting; or |
|
|
|
the other party breaches its representations, warranties,
covenants or agreements contained in the merger agreement;
provided, however, that the non-breaching party may not
terminate the agreement prior to the expiration of 15 days
from the date that notice of the breach is provided to such
other party and as long as such other party is exercising its
best efforts to cure the breach. |
Additionally, Stantec may terminate the merger agreement if
Keiths board of directors has withdrawn, modified or
changed, in any manner adverse to Stantec, its support for
the merger or takes other specified actions that would be
adverse to the completion of the merger. Furthermore, Keith may
terminate the merger agreement if it accepts a superior
acquisition proposal and pays a termination fee and pays
Stantecs expenses.
Termination Fee
If the merger agreement is terminated after a change in
recommendation by Keiths board of directors or a
termination by Keiths board of directors in order to enter
into a binding agreement with respect to a superior acquisition
proposal, Keith is required to pay Stantec a termination fee of
US$3.0 million, plus Stantecs fees, costs and
expenses in connection with the merger. The termination fee
could discourage other companies from seeking to acquire or
merge with Keith.
Comparison of Shareholder Rights
The election by you to convert your shares of Keith common stock
into the right to receive Stantec common shares in the merger
will result in differences between your rights as a Stantec
shareholder, governed by the Canada Business
Corporations Act, and your rights as a Keith shareholder,
governed by the CCC. See Comparison of Shareholder
Rights on page 115.
15
Risk Factors
In addition to the other information included or incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/ prospectus, including
the matters addressed under the caption Forward-Looking
Statements, you should carefully consider the matters
described below in evaluating an investment in Stantec common
shares offered by this proxy statement/ prospectus.
Risk Factors Relating to the Merger
You cannot be certain of the
value of merger consideration that you will receive in the
merger.
Upon completion of the merger, you shall have the right to elect
to receive any one of the following forms of merger
consideration in exchange for each and every share of Keith
common stock that you own:
|
|
|
(1) a mix of cash and stock equal to (A) US$11.00 in
cash, (B) 0.23 common shares of Stantec and (C) that
number of Stantec common shares equal to US$5.50, based on
the 20-day average trading price of Stantec common shares prior
to the merger; |
|
|
(2) all Stantec common shares equal to (A) 0.23
Stantec common shares and (B) that number of Stantec common
shares equal to US$16.50, based on the 20-day average
trading price of Stantec common shares prior to the
merger; or |
|
|
(3) all cash equal to (A) US$16.50 and (B) cash
equal to the value of 0.23 common shares, based on the
20-day average trading price of Stantec common shares prior to
the merger. |
As is described above, and as is more fully detailed in the
merger agreement attached to this proxy statement/ prospectus as
Appendix A, a fixed exchange ratio of 0.23 forms part
of the merger consideration calculation regardless of which form
of merger consideration you elect to receive. Therefore, the
dollar value of the merger consideration you receive under any
of option (1), (2) or (3) above is dependent on
the trading price of Stantec common shares prior to the time
that the merger is consummated. The market price of Stantec
common shares is subject to volatility and will likely be
different, and may be lower, on the date you receive your
Stantec common shares than the market price of Stantec common
shares as of the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus or the
date of the special meeting. For example, the high and low
closing sales prices for Stantecs common shares during the
52 weeks ended August 15, 2005 were C$38.75 and
C$20.35, respectively. Similarly, for those shareholders who
elect to receive all or part of their consideration in Stantec
common shares, the number of Stantec common shares that such
shareholders will receive will vary depending on the average
trading price of Stantec common shares prior to the merger. The
higher the average trading price, the fewer Stantec common
shares you will receive and the lower the average trading price,
the more Stantec common shares you will receive. In addition,
part of the value in U.S. dollars of the merger
consideration you receive will vary depending upon changes in
the applicable currency exchange rate, which is subject to
significant change. For example, during 2004 the Canadian dollar
ranged in value from a high of US$0.8434 to a low of US$0.8063.
In all cases, the exact amount of cash or number of shares you
will receive is not currently known.
In addition, the price of Keith common stock immediately prior
to the effective time of the merger may vary from its price on
the date the merger agreement was executed, on the date of this
proxy statement/ prospectus and on the date of the special
meeting. Variations in the prices of Keith common stock and of
Stantec common shares prior to the effective time of the merger
and of Stantec common shares after the effective time may be the
result of various factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the business, operations or prospects of Stantec or
Keith; |
|
|
|
changes in economic conditions and the outlook for economic
conditions; |
|
|
|
market reaction to the proposed merger; and |
|
|
|
the timing of the consummation of the merger. |
16
If the merger is completed, it will not be completed until
following the date of the special meeting and the satisfaction
or waiver of all conditions to the merger. Therefore, at the
time of the special meeting you will not know the precise dollar
value of the merger consideration that you will become entitled
to receive at the effective time of the merger. You are urged to
obtain a current market quotation for Stantec common shares.
|
|
|
Failure to complete the merger could negatively impact the
price of Keith common stock and Keiths future business and
operations. |
The proposed merger with Keith is subject to a number of
conditions, including the approval of the Keith shareholders of
the merger agreement, the receipt of tax opinions from legal
counsel and a requirement that Keith have cash and cash
equivalents of at least US$40.0 million. At June 30,
2005, Keith had cash and cash equivalents of
US$43.9 million. If any of these conditions were to fail to
be satisfied, the merger may not be consummated. If the merger
is not completed, the ongoing business of Keith and the trading
price of the Keith common stock may be adversely affected and
Keith will be subject to several risks, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
failure to complete the merger may seriously harm
investors and analysts perception of Keiths
underlying business and prospects which could seriously harm
Keiths stock price; |
|
|
|
the price of the Keith common stock, which currently reflects a
premium as a result of the proposed merger, may decline to price
ranges similar to, or below, those that existed prior to the
announcement of the merger; |
|
|
|
costs related to the merger, such as legal, accounting,
financial advisory and financial printing fees must be paid by
Keith, even if the merger is not completed; |
|
|
|
Keith may be required to pay Stantec a termination fee of
US$3.0 million plus its expenses, if the merger agreement
is terminated in certain circumstances; |
|
|
|
the diversion of Keiths managements attention from
the day-to-day business of Keith and the unavoidable disruption
to Keiths employees and its relationships with customers
may, in turn, detract from Keiths ability to grow revenue
and minimize costs and lead to a loss of market position that
Keith could be unable to regain; |
|
|
|
Keith management may not pursue operating plans and acquisitions
and other opportunities that could be beneficial to Keith; |
|
|
|
the announcement of the merger could have an adverse effect on
Keiths revenue in the near-term if customers delay, defer
or cancel contracts pending resolution of the merger; if this
were to occur, Keiths results of operations and quarterly
revenue could be substantially below the expectations of market
analysts and could cause a reduction in the trading price of the
Keith common stock; and |
|
|
|
Keith would not realize the benefits it expects to receive by
being part of a combined company with Stantec, as well as the
potentially enhanced financial and competitive position Keith
believes would result from the merger. |
In addition, in the event that the merger is not completed and
the Keith board of directors determines to seek another merger
or business combination, it may not be able to find a partner
willing to pay an equivalent or more attractive price than that
which would have been paid in the merger with Stantec Consulting.
|
|
|
An election to receive all shares or all cash may not
result in a payment in all shares or all cash. |
Your ability to receive all shares or all cash will be subject
to a pro rata adjustment should one of these alternatives be
oversubscribed. For example, on the one hand if the number of
Stantec common shares that Keith shareholders elect to receive
is greater than the total number of Stantec common shares that
Stantec is required to issue, then you will receive a
proportionate allocation of Stantec common shares and cash based
17
on the formula set out in the merger agreement. On the other
hand, if the amount of cash that Keith shareholders elect to
receive is greater than the total amount of cash that Stantec is
required to pay, then you will receive a proportionate
allocation of cash and Stantec common shares based on the
formula set out in the merger agreement. Therefore, even if you
elect to receive all stock and are required to take some cash as
part of your consideration, you may recognize a gain under
U.S. federal income tax laws and thus be exposed to a tax
liability. Similarly, even if you should elect to receive all
cash in exchange for your Keith common stock, you may receive
some Stantec common shares as part of your consideration and the
value of your all cash election will depend on the average
trading price of Stantec common shares prior to the merger.
|
|
|
The fairness opinion provided by Bear Stearns was given as
of the date of the merger agreement and does not reflect
subsequent changes in circumstances. |
The opinion of Bear Stearns, financial advisor to the Keith
board of directors, addresses the fairness from a financial
point of view of the merger consideration to be received by
Keith shareholders based on the financial, economic, market and
other conditions as they existed on April 14, 2005 and not
at any later time. Significant time has elapsed since the date
of the fairness opinion and changes in conditions, which are
beyond the control of Keith, Stantec and Bear Stearns, and on
which the opinion is based, may have altered the value of Keith
common stock or Stantec common shares. As a result, Bear
Stearns opinion may be of less relevance at the time you
are asked to approve the merger at the shareholders
meeting. Bear Stearns has no obligation to update its fairness
opinion.
|
|
|
The fairness opinion provided by Bear Stearns is based on
various assumptions and is subject to various
limitations. |
In its review and analysis and in formulating its opinion, Bear
Stearns assumed and relied, without independent verification,
upon the accuracy and completeness of the financial and other
information provided to it by Keith and Stantec, including the
range of projected financial results provided to it by
management of Keith, and assumed that the financial information
and range of projected financial results were reasonably
prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available
judgments and estimates of Keith management. Bear Stearns did
not assume any responsibility for making or obtaining an
independent valuation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities
of Keith or Stantec, and no such independent valuation or
appraisal was provided to Bear Stearns.
|
|
|
Keiths shareholders may receive a lower return on
their investment after the merger. |
Although Stantec and Keith believe that the merger will create
financial, operational and strategic benefits for the combined
company and its shareholders, these benefits may not be
achieved. The combination of Keiths and Stantecs
businesses, even if conducted in an efficient, effective and
timely manner, may not result in combined financial performance
that is better than what each company would have achieved
independently if the merger had not occurred.
|
|
|
Stantec and Keith may experience difficulties in
integrating Keiths business with the existing operations
of Stantec and so may not realize the anticipated benefits of
the merger. |
Stantecs and Keiths rationales for the merger are,
in part, predicated on our ability to leverage the combined
strengths of the two companies to increase opportunities and
grow revenue. Integrating Keiths operations and personnel
with those of Stantec will be a complex process and Stantec may
not be able to complete the process rapidly or without
encountering difficulties. The successful integration of
Keiths operations with those of Stantec will require,
among other things, integration of Keiths and
Stantecs professional services, sales and marketing
operations, information and software systems and coordination of
employee retention and hiring and training operations. The
diversion of the attention of management to the integration
effort and any difficulties encountered in combining operations
could adversely affect the combined companys businesses
and prevent them from realizing the anticipated improvement in
professional service offerings, market penetration and
geographic presence that form the foundation for the merger.
18
|
|
|
Uncertainties associated with the merger or Stantec as a
new owner may cause Keith to lose customers. |
Keiths customers may, in response to the announcement of
the merger, delay or defer decisions concerning their use of
Keiths services because of uncertainties related to the
consummation of the merger, including that the merger may not be
consummated if all of the conditions to the merger are not
fulfilled. This could have an adverse effect on Stantecs
revenue and profitability.
|
|
|
Uncertainties associated with the merger may cause a loss
of employees. |
The ability to attract and retain trained professionals is one
of the key drivers of Stantecs business and results.
Therefore, the success of the combined company after the merger
will depend in part upon the ability of Stantec and Keith to
retain key employees of both companies. Competition for
qualified personnel can be very intense. In addition, key
employees may depart because of issues relating to the
uncertainty and difficulty of the consummation of the merger,
the integration or a desire not to remain with the combined
company. Accordingly, Stantec may be unable to retain key
employees to the same extent it was able to do so in the past.
|
|
|
Keiths directors and officers have conflicts of
interest in recommending the merger to Keiths shareholders
and may have different interests than you in approving the
merger agreement. |
In considering the recommendation of Keiths board of
directors to approve the merger agreement, Keiths
shareholders should recognize that certain Keith directors and
officers have interests in the merger that are different from,
or are in addition to, their interests as Keith shareholders.
These interests include:
|
|
|
|
|
future employment arrangements; |
|
|
|
severance benefits in the merger; |
|
|
|
receipt of unvested Stantec restricted common shares in exchange
for unvested Keith restricted common stock; |
|
|
|
acceleration of the vesting of stock options as a result of the
merger; and |
|
|
|
indemnification against certain liabilities arising both before
and after the merger. |
These and additional interests are described under the section
of this proxy statement/ prospectus captioned Interests of
Keiths and Stantecs Executive Officers and Directors
in the Merger.
|
|
|
Stantec is governed by the laws of Canada and a
substantial portion of its assets are, and many of its directors
and officers reside, outside of the United States. As a result,
it may not be possible for shareholders to enforce civil
liability provisions of the securities laws of the
United States in Canada. |
Stantec is governed by the laws of Canada. A substantial
portion of Stantecs assets are located outside the
United States, and some of Stantecs directors and all
of its officers and some of the experts named in this proxy
statement/ prospectus are residents outside of the
United States. As a result, it may be difficult for
investors to effect service within the United States upon
Stantec and those directors, officers and experts, or to realize
in the United States upon judgments of courts of the
United States predicated upon civil liability of Stantec
and such directors, officers or experts under the
United States federal securities laws. There is uncertainty
as to the enforceability in Canada by a court in original
actions, or in actions to enforce judgments of
United States courts, of the civil liabilities predicated
upon the United States federal securities laws.
|
|
|
Stantec expects to maintain its status as a foreign
private issuer under the rules and regulations of the SEC
and, thus, will be exempt from a number of rules under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and will be permitted to file
less information with the SEC than a company incorporated in the
United States. |
As a foreign private issuer, Stantec will be exempt
from rules under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
referred to in the proxy statement/ prospectus as the
Exchange Act, that impose certain disclosure
19
and procedural requirements for proxy solicitations under
Section 14 of the Exchange Act. In addition,
Stantecs officers, directors and principal shareholders
will be exempt from the reporting and short-swing
profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange
Act and the rules under the Exchange Act with respect to their
purchases and sales of Stantec common shares. Moreover, Stantec
will not be required to file periodic reports and financial
statements with the SEC as promptly as U.S. companies whose
securities are registered under the Exchange Act, nor will it be
required to comply with Regulation FD, which restricts the
selective disclosure of material information. Accordingly, there
may be less publicly available information concerning Stantec
than there is for U.S. public companies such as Keith. Moreover,
Stantec expects to be eligible to use the Canada-U.S.
multijurisdictional disclosure system, which will permit Stantec
to meet most of its continuous disclosure obligations by filing
Canadian disclosure documents with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Such Canadian disclosure documents differ from the
disclosure required of a U.S. company. In addition, Stantec will
not be required to have its internal controls audited pursuant
to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act until it
issues its annual report for the year ended December 31,
2006.
|
|
|
The merger agreement contains provisions that may
discourage other companies from trying to acquire Keith for
greater merger consideration. |
The merger agreement contains provisions that may discourage a
third party from submitting a business combination proposal to
Keith that might result in greater value to Keiths
shareholders than the merger. These provision include the
prohibition on Keith from soliciting any acquisition proposals
or offers for competing transactions and the requirement that
Keith pay a US$3.0 million termination fee plus
Stantecs expenses if the merger agreement is terminated in
specified circumstances.
Risks Related to Stantecs Business
|
|
|
We may be unsuccessful in our goal to increase the size
and profitability of our operations, which could lead to a
reduction in our market share and our competitiveness as our
industry consolidates. |
To help reduce our susceptibility to industry-specific and
regional economic cycles and to take advantage of economies of
scale in the highly fragmented professional services industry,
we intend to continue to diversify our business both in terms of
geographic presence and service offerings. Since the beginning
of 2002, we have completed 18 acquisitions and we
expect to continue to pursue selective acquisitions of business
that will enable us to enhance our market penetration and
increase and diversify our revenue base. However, we may not be
able to locate suitable acquisitions or be able to consummate
any such transactions on terms and conditions acceptable to us.
As the professional services industry consolidates, suitable
acquisition candidates are expected to become more difficult to
locate and may only be available at prices or under terms that
are less favorable than in the past. In addition, some of our
competitors are much larger than us and have greater financial
resources than us and can better afford to pay a premium for
potential acquisition candidates. If we are unable to
effectively compete for or locate suitable acquisitions, our
business will not grow in the manner we expect and we will have
difficulty achieving our goals for growth.
|
|
|
If we are unable to effectively manage our growth, we may
experience a decline in our revenue and profitability. |
We have grown rapidly in the recent past. For example, our gross
revenue has doubled in the past five years. We intend to
pursue further growth through acquisitions and otherwise, as
part of our business strategy, but we may not be able to manage
our growth effectively and efficiently. Our inability to manage
our growth could cause us to incur unforeseen costs, time delays
or other negative impacts, any of which could cause a decline in
our revenue and profitability. Our rapid growth has presented
and will continue to present, numerous administrative and
operational challenges, including the management of an expanding
array of engineering and consulting services, the assimilation
of financial reporting systems, increased pressure on our senior
management and increased demand on our systems and internal
controls. Furthermore, as we expand our service offerings and
geographic presence, we may not be able to maintain the current
level of quality of services.
20
We also may encounter difficulties integrating acquisitions that
we do make. For example, we acquired Beak International
Incorporated in October 2002, but were not successful in
integrating that firm and have sold the majority of that
business back to various employee groups. Acquired businesses
may not be profitable because we may not be successful in
generating the same level of operating performance that an
acquired company experienced prior to the acquisition. Also, we
may not be able to maintain our reputation in an acquired
entitys geographic area or service offerings and as a
consequence our ability to attract and retain clients in those
or other areas may be negatively impacted. Any of these
integration issues could divert managements attention from
other business activities and could impact our ability to grow
our business effectively.
|
|
|
From time to time, we have pursued and may continue to
pursue and invest in business opportunities that are not
directly within our core competencies. These new business
opportunities may require a disproportionate amount of
managements time to develop profitably and may not perform
as expected. |
Acquisitions may bring us into businesses that we have not
previously conducted and expose us to additional business risks
that are different than those we have traditionally experienced.
For example, we acquired GKO Engineering in March
of 2002. GKO provided services in the industrial
practice area, an area in which we previously did not have a
significant presence. Consequently, we may depend in part upon
the knowledge and expertise of the professional service
providers and management teams that we acquire in order to make
these business opportunities profitable. New business
opportunities frequently bring with them a learning curve that
may require substantial management time, which may create a
distraction from our day-to-day business operations. If these
business opportunities do not perform as anticipated or are not
profitable, our earnings in those periods may be materially
adversely affected and we may experience a partial or complete
loss of our investment.
|
|
|
We may be unable to secure the additional capital required
to fund our acquisition strategy, which could lead to a
reduction in our market share and our competitiveness. |
In order to fund future acquisitions we will need access to
substantial amounts of capital. However, we may be unable to
obtain the necessary capital to finance a successful acquisition
program while meeting our other cash needs. If we are unable to
obtain additional capital on acceptable terms, we may be
required to reduce the scope of our anticipated expansion, which
may negatively affect our future competitiveness and results of
operations.
Currently, we intend to use cash and our common shares as
consideration in making future acquisitions. Using internally
generated cash or taking on debt to complete acquisitions could
substantially limit our operational and financial flexibility.
The extent to which we will be able or willing to use our common
shares for acquisitions will depend on the market value of our
shares from time to time and the willingness of potential
sellers to accept our shares as full or partial payment. In
addition, using our shares for future acquisitions may result in
a significant dilution to existing shareholders.
|
|
|
The professional consulting services industry is highly
competitive, which could have a negative impact on our profit
margins and our market share. |
The markets that we serve are highly competitive and we have
numerous competitors for all of the services we offer. The
principal competitive factors in the services we offer are:
reputation; experience; breadth and quality of services;
technical proficiency; local offices; competitive total project
fees; and service delivery. The number and identity of
competitors varies widely with the type of service we provide.
For small to medium sized projects, we compete with many
engineering, architectural and other professional consulting
firms. With larger projects, there are fewer but still many
competitors and many of these competitors have greater financial
and other resources than we do. While we compete with other
large private and public companies in certain geographic
locations, our primary competitors are smaller privately held
regional firms in the United States and Canada. Generally,
competition places downward pressure on our contract prices and
profit margins. However, such impact is difficult to quantify.
Intense competition is expected to continue in these markets,
presenting us with significant challenges in our ability to
maintain strong growth rates and
21
acceptable profit margins. If we are unable to meet these
competitive challenges, we could lose market share to our
competitors and experience an overall reduction in our profits.
We may not be able to compete successfully with such competitors
and such competition could cause us to lose customers, increase
expenditures or reduce pricing, any of which could have a
material adverse effect on our earnings and stock price.
|
|
|
Economic downturns could have a negative impact on our
businesses as our clients may curtail investment in
infrastructure projects. |
Demand for the services offered by us has been, and is expected
to continue to be, subject to significant fluctuations due to a
variety of factors beyond our control, including economic
conditions. During economic downturns, the ability of both
private and governmental entities to make expenditures may
decline significantly, which would have a materially adverse
effect on our revenue and profitability. We cannot be certain
that economic or political conditions will be generally
favorable or that there will not be significant fluctuations
adversely affecting our industry as a whole or key markets
targeted by us.
|
|
|
A significant portion of our revenue is derived from
clients in the real estate industry. Consequently, our business
could suffer materially if there is a downturn in the real
estate market. |
On a pro forma basis, after giving effect to the merger as if it
had occurred on January 1, 2004, we estimate that
approximately 43% of our 2004 net revenue would have
been derived from services related to residential and commercial
real estate development projects. Consequently, reduced demand
in the real estate market would likely have an adverse impact on
our urban land group. The real estate market and, therefore, our
business, may be impacted by a number of factors, which may
include:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in employment levels and other general economic
conditions; |
|
|
|
changes in interest rates and in the availability, cost and
terms of financing; |
|
|
|
the impact of present or future environmental, zoning or other
laws and regulations; |
|
|
|
changes in real estate tax rates and assessments and other
operating expenses; |
|
|
|
changes in levels of government infrastructure spending and
fiscal policies; and |
|
|
|
natural or manmade disasters and other factors which are beyond
our control. |
A significant decrease in the demand for our real estate related
services could have a material adverse effect on our overall
business, including our results of operations and liquidity.
|
|
|
We derive significant revenue from contracts with
government agencies. Any disruption in government funding or in
our relationship with those agencies could adversely affect our
business. |
The demand for our services is related to the level of
government funding that is allocated to rebuild, improve and
expand infrastructure systems. We derive a significant amount of
our revenue from government or government-funded projects and
expect to continue to derive a significant amount of our revenue
from such projects in the future. Approximately 40 to 55%
of our gross revenue during the years ended December 31,
2002 through 2004 was derived from government or government
funded projects. Significant changes in the level of government
funding could have an unfavorable impact on our business,
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
We believe that the success and further development of our
business depends, in part, upon the continued funding of these
government programs and upon our ability to participate in them.
Governments may not have the available resources to fund these
programs or may not fund these programs even if governments have
available financial resources. Some of these government
contracts are subject to renewal or extensions annually, so we
cannot be assured of our continued work under these contracts in
the future. In addition, government agencies can terminate these
contracts at their convenience. As a result, we may incur costs
in connection with the termination of these contracts and suffer
a loss of business. Also, contracts with
22
government agencies are sometimes subject to substantial
regulation and audit of actual costs incurred. Consequently,
there may be a downward adjustment to our revenue if accrued
recoverable costs exceed actual recoverable costs.
|
|
|
We may have difficulty in attracting and retaining
qualified professionals, which may harm our reputation in the
marketplace and restrict our ability to implement our business
strategy. |
We derive our revenue almost exclusively from services performed
by our professionals. Consequently, one of the key drivers of
our business is our ability to attract and retain qualified
professionals. We may not be able to attract and retain the
desired number of professionals over the short or long term.
There is significant competition for professionals with the
skills necessary for providing our services from major and
boutique consulting, engineering, public agency, research and
other professional service firms. Our inability to attract and
retain qualified professionals could impede our ability to
secure and complete engagements, in which event we may lose
market share and our revenue and profit may decline. In
addition, if our employees leave our company and become
competitors of ours, we may lose other employees and some of our
existing clients that have formed relationships with such former
employees. We may also lose future clients to a former employee
as a new competitor. In either event, we could lose clients and
revenue, and our profitability could decline.
|
|
|
If we are unable to engage qualified subcontractors, we
may lose projects, revenue and clients. |
We often contract with outside companies to perform designated
portions of the services we perform for our clients.
In 2004, subcontractor costs accounted for
approximately 8.6% of our gross revenue. If we are unable
to engage qualified subcontractors, our ability to perform under
some of our contracts may be impeded and the quality of our
service may decline. As a consequence, we may lose projects,
revenue and clients.
|
|
|
The nature of our business exposes us to potential
liability claims and contract disputes, which may reduce our
profits. |
Our operations are subject to the risk of third-party claims in
the normal course of our business, some of which may be
substantial. We have been and may in the future be named as a
defendant in legal proceedings where parties may make a claim
for damages or other remedies with respect to our projects or
other matters. For example, one of our subsidiaries is named in
a lawsuit related to design services it provided for a roadway
in New York State in connection with a multi-vehicle accident
that occurred on the roadway. See Description of
Stantecs Business Legal Proceedings. Any
litigation resulting from our business operations could distract
management attention from normal business operations, divert
financial resources to the defense of such claims or result in
significant attorney fees and damage awards, for which we may
not be fully insured and which could harm our reputation. Any of
these circumstances could adversely affect our profitability.
|
|
|
Our insurance may not cover all claims for which we may be
liable and expenses related to insurance coverage may adversely
impact our profitability. |
We maintain insurance coverage for our operations, including
policies covering general liability, automobile liability,
environmental liability, workers compensation and
employers liability, directors
and officers liability and professional liability
insurance. The maximum coverage under our professional liability
policy is generally C$35 million per claim and per
year, with a per claim deductible of C$500,000 and an
aggregate excess deductible of C$2.5 million. In
September 2003, we established a regulated captive
insurance company to insure and fund the payment of any
professional liability self-insured retentions related to claims
arising after August 1, 2003. We, or our clients, also
obtain project-specific insurance for designated projects from
time-to-time. Although we believe that we have made adequate
arrangements for insuring against the above risks, these
arrangements may be insufficient to cover any particular risk.
When it is determined that we have liability, we may not be
covered by insurance or, if covered, the dollar amount of these
liabilities may exceed our policy limits. Our professional
liability coverage is on a claims-made basis
23
covering only claims actually made during the policy period
currently in effect. In addition, even where insurance is
maintained for such exposures, the policies have deductibles
resulting in our assuming exposure for a layer of coverage with
respect to any such claims. Any liability not covered by our
insurance, in excess of our insurance limits or, if covered by
insurance but subject to a high deductible, could result in a
significant loss for us, which may reduce our profits and cash
available for operations. Moreover, we may become subject to
liability that cannot be insured against or against which we may
choose not to insure because of high premium costs or for other
reasons. Our expansion into new services or geographic areas
could result in our failure to obtain coverage for these
services or areas, or the coverage being offered may be at a
higher cost than our current coverage. Due to the current
insurance environment, we have experienced and may continue to
experience an increase in our insurance premiums. We may not be
able to pass these increases on to our clients in increased
billing rates.
|
|
|
If we experience delays and/ or defaults in customer
payments, we could suffer liquidity problems or we could be
unable to recover our expenditures. |
Because of the nature of our contracts, at times we commit
resources to projects prior to receiving payments from the
customer in amounts sufficient to cover expenditures on client
projects as they are incurred. Delays in customer payments may
require us to make a working capital investment. If a customer
defaults in making its payments on a project in which we have
devoted significant resources, it could have a material negative
effect on our liquidity and results of operations. In addition,
clients that withhold payment are more likely to bring claims
against us and they have a higher tendency toward
dissatisfaction with the services we provide.
|
|
|
We bear the risk of cost overruns in a significant number
of our contracts. We may experience reduced profits or, in some
cases, losses under these contracts if costs increase above our
estimates. |
We conduct our business under various types of contractual
arrangements, most of which are fee for service. However,
approximately 67% of the dollar-value of our contracts are
based on a fixed fee or time-and-materials contract with a
ceiling on the maximum costs to the client. Under fixed-fee
contracts, we perform services at a stipulated price. Under
time-and-materials contracts with not-to-exceed provisions, we
are reimbursed for the number of labor hours expended at an
established hourly rate plus the cost of materials
incurred, subject, however, to a stated maximum dollar amount
for the services to be provided under the contract. In both of
these types of contracts, we agree to provide our services based
on our estimate of the costs a particular project will involve.
These estimates are established in part on cost and scheduling
projections, which may prove inaccurate, or circumstances may
change such as unanticipated technical problems, weaknesses in
project management, difficulties in obtaining permits or
approvals, changes in local laws or delays beyond our ability to
control. Underestimation of costs for these types of contracts
may cause us to incur losses or result in a project not being as
profitable as we expected. In addition, projects not completed
on schedule further reduce profitability because personnel must
continue to work on the project longer than anticipated, which
may prevent them from pursuing and working on new projects.
Projects that are over budget or not on schedule can also lead
to client dissatisfaction.
|
|
|
Our backlog is subject to unexpected adjustments and
cancellations and is, therefore, an uncertain indicator of our
future earnings. |
As of December 31, 2004, our backlog was approximately
C$380.0 million. The revenue projected in our backlog may
not be realized or, if realized, may not result in profits.
Projects may remain in our backlog for an extended period of
time. In addition, project cancellations or scope adjustments
may occur, from time to time, with respect to contracts
reflected in our backlog. Backlog reductions can adversely
affect the revenue and profit we actually receive from contracts
reflected in our backlog. Future project cancellations and scope
adjustments could further reduce the dollar amount of our
backlog and the revenue and profits that we actually receive.
Finally, poor project or contract performance could also impact
our profits.
24
|
|
|
Because we report our results in Canadian dollars and a
substantial portion of our revenue and expenses are recorded in
U.S. dollars, our results are subject to currency exchange
risk. |
While we report our financial results in Canadian dollars, a
substantial portion of our revenue and expenses are in
U.S. dollars. For purposes of financial reporting under
Canadian GAAP, revenue and expenses denominated in foreign
currencies are translated into Canadian dollars at the average
exchange rates prevailing during the year. We expect to continue
to report our financial results in Canadian dollars in
accordance with Canadian GAAP. Therefore, if the Canadian
dollar were to strengthen relative to the U.S. dollar and
other currencies, the amount of net income from non-Canadian
dollar denominated business could decrease which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
The value of the Canadian dollar relative to the
U.S. dollar is subject to volatility. For example, the
average exchange rates for the years ended December 31,
2004, December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002
for C$1.00 were US$0.7701, US$0.7186
and US$0.6368, respectively. Furthermore, this volatility
may continue in the future and, as discussed above, increases in
the strength of the Canadian dollar relative to the
U.S. dollar may have a negative impact on our results of
operations.
We enter into forward contracts to manage risk associated with
net operating assets outside of our U.S. operations
denominated in U.S. dollars (other than with respect to net
operating assets that are owned by U.S. subsidiaries).
These derivative contracts, which are not accounted for as
hedges, are marked to market, and any changes in the market
value are recorded in income or expense when the changes occur.
As a result, we may not benefit from any weakening of the
Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar.
|
|
|
We may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual
property, which could force us to take costly protective
measures such as litigation. |
To establish and protect our intellectual property rights, we
rely upon a combination of trademark and trade secret laws,
together with licenses, exclusivity agreements and other
contractual covenants. The measures we take to protect our
intellectual property rights may prove inadequate to prevent
misappropriation of its intellectual property. Litigation may be
necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights or to
determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of
others. Litigation of this type could result in substantial
costs and diversion of resources, may result in counterclaims or
other claims against us and could significantly harm our results
of operations.
|
|
|
Adverse weather conditions and natural or other disasters
may cause a delay or elimination of our net revenue which
otherwise would have been recognized and adversely affect our
profitability. |
Field activities are generally performed outdoors and may
include surveying, archeology, plant start-up and testing, and
plant operations. Certain weather conditions and natural and
other disasters, such as fire, floods, and similar events, may
cause postponements in the initiation and/ or completion of our
field activities and may hinder the ability of our office
employees to arrive at work, which may result in a delay or
elimination of revenue that otherwise would have been
recognized, while certain costs will continue to be incurred.
Adverse weather conditions or disasters may also delay or
eliminate our initiation and/ or completion of the various
phases of work relating to our other engineering services that
commence concurrent with or subsequent to field activities. Any
delay in completion of the field, office and/ or other
activities may require us to incur additional costs attributable
to overtime work necessary to meet the clients required
schedule. Due to various factors, a delay in the commencement or
completion of a project may also result in a cancellation of the
contract. As a result, our net revenue and profitability may be
adversely affected.
|
|
|
One of our primary competitive advantages is our
reputation and experience. If our reputation is damaged due to
client dissatisfaction, our ability to win additional business
may be materially damaged. |
Although we serve many diverse clients and are not dependent on
any one client or group of clients to sustain our business, our
reputation for delivering effective and efficient solutions on
complex projects is one of our most valuable business
development assets. We believe one of our primary competitive
advantages is
25
our reputation and experience. The loss of this reputation due
to client dissatisfaction represents a significant risk to our
ability to win additional business both from existing clients
and from those whom we may have dealings with in the future.
|
|
|
A substantial portion of our total assets are represented
by goodwill and other intangible assets as a result of our
acquisitions. If our acquired businesses do not perform as
expected, we may be required to write down the value of our
goodwill and other intangible assets, which could have a
material adverse effect on our earnings. |
Approximately 25% of our total assets are represented by
goodwill and other intangible assets. When we acquire a
consulting business, a significant portion of the purchase price
for the acquisition is generally allocated to goodwill and other
identifiable intangible assets. The amount of purchase price
allocated to goodwill is determined by the excess of the
purchase price paid by us to acquire the consulting business
over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired.
Canadian and U.S. accounting rules require us to perform an
annual impairment test of our goodwill and indefinite life
intangible assets. A deterioration in the operating results of
such acquired businesses or the failure of such acquired
business to meet our expectations may adversely affect the
carrying value of our goodwill and other indefinite life
intangible assets and could result in an impairment of goodwill
associated with such business. As part of our annual review of
goodwill for impairment, we will be considering our actual
performance for each of our reporting units compared to our
expectations for 2005 and updating our future expectations for
such reporting units. Our goodwill impairment test will be
completed in the third quarter of 2005 and will address
impairment issues, if any, at that time. An impairment of
goodwill would be recorded as a charge in our income statement,
which could have a material effect on our earnings.
Risks Related to Stantec Common Shares
|
|
|
Because Stantecs business is more diverse than
Keiths in terms of geographic presence and professional
service offerings, Stantecs share price could be impacted
by different factors than those that affect the price of Keith
common stock. |
Upon completion of the merger, you may become a holder of our
common shares. Our overall business differs from that of Keith,
and our results of operations, as well as the trading price of
our common shares, may be affected by factors different from
those affecting Keiths results of operations and the price
of Keith common stock. For example, while Keith predominately
focuses on providing professional services to the real estate
development industry primarily within California, Stantec
provides professional services to clients involved in the
building development, environmental, industrial, transportation
and urban land development industries across most of Canada and
the United States. For a discussion of our business and
information to consider in connection with such businesses, see
Description of Stantecs Business and for a
discussion of Keiths business and information to consider
in connection with such businesses, see Keiths Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, which is incorporated by reference in
this proxy statement/ prospectus.
|
|
|
Our share price has historically been subject to
volatility. As a result, the price of our common shares may
decrease in the future due to a number of company and industry
specific or general economic factors. |
Our share price has experienced volatility in the past and will
likely be volatile in the future. For example, the high and low
closing sales price for Stantecs common shares during the
52 weeks ended August 15, 2005 were C$39.25
and C$20.35, respectively.
The price of our common shares may fluctuate substantially in
the future due to, among other things, the following factors:
(1) the failure of our quarterly or annual operating
results to meet expectations; (2) the reaction of markets
and securities analysts to announcements and developments
involving us; (3) adverse developments in the worldwide,
Canadian or U.S. economy, the financial markets and the
engineering and consulting services market; (3) changes in
interest rates; (4) announcements by key competitors;
(5) additions
26
or departures of key personnel; (6) announcements of legal
proceedings or regulatory matters; and (7) general
volatility in the stock market.
In addition, the stock market has experienced volatility that
has affected the market prices of equity securities of many
companies, and that has often been unrelated to the operating
performance of such companies. A number of other factors, many
of which are beyond our control, could also cause the market
price of our common shares to fluctuate substantially. As a
result, you may not be able to resell your shares at or above
the associated value of Keiths shares on the date of the
merger, if at all.
|
|
|
Our share price could be adversely affected if a large
number of our common shares are offered for sale or sold. |
Notwithstanding the ability of Keiths shareholders to
elect to receive cash or stock or mixed consideration in
exchange for their Keith shares upon consummation of the merger,
some of the Keith shareholders may subsequently decide to
dispose of their Stantec shares following the merger which could
lead to a large supply of our common shares on the market. If
the supply of our common shares is significantly greater than
the associated demand, the market price of our common shares may
significantly decline and may not recover.
|
|
|
If we need to sell or issue additional common shares and/
or incur additional debt to finance future acquisitions, your
stock ownership could be diluted and our results of operations
could be adversely affected. |
Our business strategy is to expand into new markets and enhance
our position in existing markets through the acquisition of
complementary businesses. In order to successfully complete
targeted acquisitions or to fund our other activities, we may
issue additional equity securities that could dilute your stock
ownership. We may also incur additional debt if we acquire
another company and this could increase our debt repayment
obligations which could have a negative impact on future
liquidity and future profitability.
27
Forward-Looking Statements
Some of the statements contained in this proxy statement/
prospectus, including those relating to Stantecs
strategies and other statements that are predictive in nature,
that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, or
that include words such as expects,
anticipates, intends, plans,
believes, estimates or similar
expressions, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements include, without limitation, the information
concerning possible or assumed future results of operations of
Stantec and Keith as set forth under The
Merger Reasons for Stantecs Board
Recommendation, The Merger Reasons for
Keiths Board Recommendation, and The
Merger Opinion of the Keiths Financial
Advisor. These statements are not historical facts but
instead represent only Stantecs and/ or Keiths
expectations, estimates and projections regarding future events.
Many factors could cause the actual results, performance or
achievements of Stantec, Keith or the combined company to be
materially different from any future results, performance, or
achievements that may be expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements, including, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulties in integrating Stantec and Keith and in achieving
anticipated cost savings and growth opportunities; |
|
|
|
difficulties in implementing Stantecs business strategy,
including difficulties in the identification of suitable
acquisition candidates, satisfactory completion of acquisitions
and the successful integration of acquisition targets; |
|
|
|
the inability to secure additional capital financing to fund our
acquisition growth strategy. |
|
|
|
increase in competition by United States, Canadian and
international competitors; |
|
|
|
the impact of adverse economic conditions and future
catastrophic events; |
|
|
|
delays, cancellations, or suspension of, or changes in the scope
of, existing contracts; |
|
|
|
changes in the level of government funding for infrastructure
projects both within North America and abroad; |
|
|
|
limited availability of qualified professional personnel and
qualified subcontractors; |
|
|
|
loss of key employees or customers due to the merger; |
|
|
|
future litigation or regulatory action; |
|
|
|
delays or defaults in customer payments for services performed; |
|
|
|
cost overruns on fixed-price, guaranteed maximum price, or unit
price contracts; |
|
|
|
exposure to risks inherent in doing business in countries other
than Canada and the United States; |
|
|
|
fluctuation in interest rates and exchange rates; |
|
|
|
protection of intellectual property; |
|
|
|
the impairment of the value of goodwill and other intangible
assets; |
|
|
|
adverse changes in future results of operations, liquidity and
financial position; and |
|
|
|
fluctuations in the market price of Keith common stock or
Stantec common shares. |
Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize,
or should assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements
prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those
described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated or expected.
28
The forward-looking statements contained in this proxy
statement/ prospectus are not guarantees of future performance
and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to
predict. The future results and shareholder value of Stantec may
differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking
statements contained in this proxy statement/ prospectus due to,
among other factors, the matters set forth under Risk
Factors as well as the other information incorporated by
reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus. See Where
You Can Find More Information. Except as required by law,
neither Stantec nor Keith undertakes any obligation to update or
release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to
reflect events or circumstances after the date of this proxy
statement/ prospectus or to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events, except as required by law.
29
Selected Historical and Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Data
of Stantec Inc.
The selected historical consolidated financial data of Stantec
set forth below is presented in Canadian dollars and the
financial statements from which the data was derived were
prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP, which differs in
certain respects from U.S. GAAP. For a discussion of the
principal differences between Canadian GAAP and
U.S. GAAP as they relate to Stantec, see note 21 to
Stantecs consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this proxy statement/ prospectus. You should read
the selected historical consolidated financial data of Stantec
set forth below in conjunction with Stantecs consolidated
financial statements and the related notes and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of Stantec included
elsewhere in this proxy statement/ prospectus. The selected
historical consolidated financial data as of June 30, 2005
and for the two quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2005
include, in the opinion of Stantec management, all normal
recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial
position and results of operations of Stantec for the dates and
periods presented. The results of operations for an interim
period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full
year or any other interim period.
The selected pro forma consolidated financial data of
Stantec set forth below is presented in Canadian dollars and has
been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, based on the
historical financial statements of Stantec and Keith, as at and
for the year ended December 31, 2004, adjusted to give
effect to the acquisition of Keith by Stantec. The
pro forma condensed consolidated statement of income data
for the two quarters ended June 30, 2005 and for the year
ended December 31, 2004 give effect to the acquisition as
if the acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2004. The
pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet data as of
June 30, 2005 give effect to the acquisition as if the
acquisition had occurred as of June 30, 2005. The
pro forma consolidated financial data is based upon
available information and certain assumptions that management of
Stantec believes are reasonable, does not purport to represent
Stantecs results of operations or financial condition for
any future period or as of any date and does not include any
potential financial benefits that may arise from the merger. You
should read the selected pro forma consolidated financial
data of Stantec set forth below in conjunction with
Stantecs pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements and the related notes, consolidated financial
statements and the related notes and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations of Stantec included elsewhere in this proxy
statement/ prospectus as well as in conjunction with
Keiths consolidated financial statements and the related
notes which are incorporated by reference in this proxy
statement/ prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
Two Quarters Ended June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands of Canadian dollars, except for share data) | |
Statement of Income Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenue
|
|
C$ |
265,568 |
|
|
C$ |
356,942 |
|
|
C$ |
428,456 |
|
|
C$ |
459,942 |
|
|
C$ |
520,879 |
|
|
C$ |
658,619 |
|
|
C$ |
254,132 |
|
|
C$ |
291,308 |
|
|
C$ |
363,095 |
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
|
221,263 |
|
|
|
298,772 |
|
|
|
365,148 |
|
|
|
391,396 |
|
|
|
449,151 |
|
|
|
575,657 |
|
|
|
222,276 |
|
|
|
246,790 |
|
|
|
313,795 |
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
20,867 |
|
|
|
27,306 |
|
|
|
33,095 |
|
|
|
39,628 |
|
|
|
44,660 |
|
|
|
55,271 |
|
|
|
18,911 |
|
|
|
30,462 |
|
|
|
34,664 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
11,226 |
|
|
|
15,370 |
|
|
|
20,192 |
|
|
|
25,070 |
|
|
|
30,190 |
|
|
|
36,652 |
|
|
|
12,103 |
|
|
|
19,801 |
|
|
|
22,077 |
|
|
Earnings per share diluted
|
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
1.31 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
1.62 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
0.96 |
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
14,851,022 |
|
|
|
17,378,646 |
|
|
|
18,799,484 |
|
|
|
19,118,016 |
|
|
|
19,007,289 |
|
|
|
22,680,289 |
|
|
|
19,230,366 |
|
|
|
19,434,844 |
|
|
|
23,108,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, | |
|
|
As of December 31, | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands of Canadian dollars) | |
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
C$ |
179,161 |
|
|
C$ |
217,492 |
|
|
C$ |
299,001 |
|
|
C$ |
326,575 |
|
|
C$ |
362,100 |
|
|
C$ |
364,614 |
|
|
C$ |
596,031 |
|
|
Total long-term debt, including current portion and
bank indebtedness
|
|
|
26,375 |
|
|
|
39,518 |
|
|
|
62,256 |
|
|
|
61,726 |
|
|
|
33,975 |
|
|
|
27,007 |
|
|
|
104,557 |
|
|
Net assets
|
|
|
92,233 |
|
|
|
107,450 |
|
|
|
151,426 |
|
|
|
160,528 |
|
|
|
189,056 |
|
|
|
210,904 |
|
|
|
322,977 |
|
|
Capital stock
|
|
|
60,259 |
|
|
|
61,555 |
|
|
|
83,973 |
|
|
|
84,281 |
|
|
|
87,656 |
|
|
|
88,218 |
|
|
|
202,537 |
|
30
Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data of The Keith
Companies, Inc.
The selected historical consolidated financial data of Keith set
forth below is presented in U.S. dollars and the financial
statements from which the data was derived were prepared in
accordance with U.S. GAAP. You should read the selected
historical financial data set forth below in conjunction with
Keiths consolidated financial statements and the related
notes and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations incorporated
by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus. The selected
historical consolidated financial data as of June 30, 2005
and for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2005
include, in the opinion of Keith management, all normal
recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial
position and results of operations of Keith for the dates and
periods presented. The results of operations for an interim
period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full
year or any other interim period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except for share data) | |
Statement of Income Data :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenue
|
|
US$ |
57,835 |
|
|
US$ |
74,314 |
|
|
US$ |
106,487 |
|
|
US$ |
99,950 |
|
|
US$ |
105,346 |
|
|
US$ |
51,304 |
|
|
US$ |
58,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
|
53,381 |
|
|
|
66,844 |
|
|
|
91,598 |
|
|
|
90,744 |
|
|
|
96,754 |
|
|
|
46,943 |
|
|
|
54,242 |
|
|
Costs of revenue
|
|
|
34,118 |
|
|
|
42,655 |
|
|
|
59,286 |
|
|
|
58,359 |
|
|
|
60,363 |
|
|
|
29,737 |
|
|
|
33,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
19,263 |
|
|
|
24,189 |
|
|
|
32,312 |
|
|
|
32,385 |
|
|
|
36,391 |
|
|
|
17,206 |
|
|
|
20,592 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
11,078 |
|
|
|
14,330 |
|
|
|
19,535 |
|
|
|
21,070 |
|
|
|
23,013 |
|
|
|
11,424 |
|
|
|
14,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
8,185 |
|
|
|
9,859 |
|
|
|
12,777 |
|
|
|
11,315 |
|
|
|
13,378 |
|
|
|
5,782 |
|
|
|
5,727 |
|
|
Interest (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes and
discontinued operations
|
|
|
7,919 |
|
|
|
10,094 |
|
|
|
13,833 |
|
|
|
11,838 |
|
|
|
13,905 |
|
|
|
5,957 |
|
|
|
6,211 |
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
3,199 |
|
|
|
3,916 |
|
|
|
5,397 |
|
|
|
4,617 |
|
|
|
5,468 |
|
|
|
2,323 |
|
|
|
2,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
4,720 |
|
|
|
6,178 |
|
|
|
8,436 |
|
|
|
7,221 |
|
|
|
8,437 |
|
|
|
3,634 |
|
|
|
3,531 |
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
US$ |
4,720 |
|
|
US$ |
5,849 |
|
|
US$ |
7,808 |
|
|
US$ |
7,221 |
|
|
US$ |
8,007 |
|
|
US$ |
3,587 |
|
|
US$ |
3,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share from continuing
operations diluted
|
|
US$ |
0.89 |
|
|
US$ |
0.87 |
|
|
US$ |
1.07 |
|
|
US$ |
0.91 |
|
|
US$ |
1.05 |
|
|
US$ |
0.45 |
|
|
US$ |
0.43 |
|
|
Earnings per share diluted
|
|
US$ |
0.89 |
|
|
US$ |
0.82 |
|
|
US$ |
0.99 |
|
|
US$ |
0.91 |
|
|
US$ |
1.00 |
|
|
US$ |
0.45 |
|
|
US$ |
0.43 |
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
5,299,679 |
|
|
|
7,092,505 |
|
|
|
7,868,877 |
|
|
|
7,957,344 |
|
|
|
8,039,457 |
|
|
|
8,012,873 |
|
|
|
8,157,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(U.S. dollars in thousands) | |
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
US$ |
7,343 |
|
|
US$ |
38,781 |
|
|
US$ |
39,613 |
|
|
US$ |
47,416 |
|
|
US$ |
55,472 |
|
|
US$ |
59,183 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
33,312 |
|
|
|
71,492 |
|
|
|
82,226 |
|
|
|
87,536 |
|
|
|
97,969 |
|
|
|
103,360 |
|
|
Total debt, excluding issuable common stock
|
|
|
5,745 |
|
|
|
1,912 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
18,239 |
|
|
|
53,733 |
|
|
|
63,612 |
|
|
|
71,962 |
|
|
|
81,921 |
|
|
|
85,970 |
|
31
Comparative Per Share Data
The following table presents, as at and for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and as at and for the first two quarters
ended June 30, 2005, selected pro forma per share amounts
for the Stantec common shares, pro forma per share equivalent
amounts for shares of Keith common stock and the comparative
historical per share data for the Stantec common shares and
Keith common stock. The pro forma amounts included in the table
below are presented as if the merger had been effective for the
period presented, have been prepared in accordance with
U.S. GAAP and are based on the purchase method of
accounting. All amounts shown are in Canadian dollars. Keith per
share amounts have been converted from U.S. dollars to
Canadian dollars at a rate of C$1.3075 equals US$1.000 for the
year ended December 31, 2004 and at a rate of C$1.2353
equals US$1.000 for the two quarters ended June 30, 2005.
The Keith merger equivalent per share amounts were calculated by
multiplying the Stantec unaudited pro forma per share amounts by
an assumed exchange ratio of 0.45, which represents the portion
of the merger consideration, excluding cash, to be paid in
Stantec common shares, based on (1) 3,673,000 Stantec
common shares expected to be issued in connection with the
merger divided by (2) 8,103,754 shares of Keith common
stock expected to be outstanding on the date of the merger. The
actual exchange ratio will vary based on the average price of
Stantec common shares and the U.S. dollar Canadian
dollar exchange rate for each of the 20 trading days ending
on the second trading day prior to the closing of the merger.
The pro forma amounts in the tables below do not include any
potential financial benefits that may arise from the merger, nor
do these amounts include the portion of restructuring and
integration costs to be incurred by Stantec.
You should read this information in conjunction with, and the
information is qualified in its entirety by, the consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes of Stantec and Keith
included or incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement/prospectus and Stantecs unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying
notes included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus. The
pro forma amounts in the table below are presented for
information purposes only. You should not rely on the pro forma
amounts as being indicative of the financial position or results
of operations of the combined company that would have actually
occurred had the merger been effective as at or during the
period presented or of the future financial position or future
results of operations of the combined company. The combined
financial information as at and for the period presented may
have been different had the companies actually been combined as
at and during those periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Two Quarters Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
June 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from operations per diluted share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stantec
|
|
C$ |
1.59 |
|
|
C$ |
1.02 |
|
|
Keith
|
|
C$ |
1.37 |
|
|
C$ |
0.53 |
|
|
Stantec pro forma
|
|
C$ |
1.62 |
|
|
C$ |
0.96 |
|
|
Keith merger equivalent(1)
|
|
C$ |
0.73 |
|
|
C$ |
0.43 |
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value per diluted share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stantec
|
|
C$ |
9.95 |
|
|
C$ |
10.85 |
|
|
Keith
|
|
C$ |
13.32 |
|
|
C$ |
13.02 |
|
|
Stantec pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
C$ |
13.98 |
|
|
Keith merger equivalent(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
C$ |
6.29 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The Keith merger equivalent per diluted share represents the
Stantec pro forma per share amount that is attributable to one
share of Keith common stock that has been exchanged for 0.45
Stantec common shares calculated as described above. As the
holders of Keith common stock will receive a combination of cash
and Stantec common shares, the exchange ratio excludes the cash
portion of the merger consideration. |
32
Dividends
Stantec has not declared or paid dividends on its common shares
since it became a public company in 1994. Stantec currently has
no plans to pay dividends on its common shares. Instead, Stantec
plans to reinvest its net income to continue its corporate
strategy of growth. The payment of dividends on Stantec common
shares in the future will depend on the need of Stantec to
finance growth, the financial condition of Stantec and other
factors which the Stantec board of directors may consider
appropriate in the circumstances. Keith has not declared or paid
any cash dividends on its capital stock.
Comparative Per Share Market Price
Stantec common shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange
under the symbol STN and on the New York Stock
Exchange under the trading symbol SXC. Keith common
stock is listed on the Nasdaq National Market under the trading
symbol TKCI. The following table sets forth, for the
respective quarters indicated, the high and low sale prices per
share of Stantec common shares as reported on the Toronto Stock
Exchange and the high and low bid prices per share of Keith
common stock as reported by the Nasdaq National Market. The
Toronto Stock Exchange sale prices of Stantec common shares are
presented in Canadian dollars and the Nasdaq National Market bid
prices of Keith common stock are presented in U.S. dollars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stantec | |
|
Keith | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 (through August 15, 2005)
|
|
C$ |
39.25 |
|
|
C$ |
29.85 |
|
|
US$ |
23.71 |
|
|
US$ |
21.10 |
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
C$ |
32.99 |
|
|
C$ |
27.65 |
|
|
US$ |
22.25 |
|
|
US$ |
16.25 |
|
March 31, 2005
|
|
C$ |
29.25 |
|
|
C$ |
24.50 |
|
|
US$ |
17.43 |
|
|
US$ |
15.25 |
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
C$ |
26.48 |
|
|
C$ |
20.35 |
|
|
US$ |
18.75 |
|
|
US$ |
13.60 |
|
September 30, 2004
|
|
C$ |
27.15 |
|
|
C$ |
20.60 |
|
|
US$ |
15.49 |
|
|
US$ |
13.25 |
|
June 30, 2004
|
|
C$ |
29.39 |
|
|
C$ |
24.20 |
|
|
US$ |
14.89 |
|
|
US$ |
13.50 |
|
March 31, 2004
|
|
C$ |
27.39 |
|
|
C$ |
22.20 |
|
|
US$ |
14.86 |
|
|
US$ |
13.45 |
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
C$ |
23.48 |
|
|
C$ |
19.11 |
|
|
US$ |
14.46 |
|
|
US$ |
11.55 |
|
September 30, 2003
|
|
C$ |
21.48 |
|
|
C$ |
17.55 |
|
|
US$ |
13.39 |
|
|
US$ |
9.85 |
|
June 30, 2003
|
|
C$ |
20.15 |
|
|
C$ |
15.50 |
|
|
US$ |
11.16 |
|
|
US$ |
9.23 |
|
March 31, 2003
|
|
C$ |
18.24 |
|
|
C$ |
14.50 |
|
|
US$ |
13.00 |
|
|
US$ |
9.00 |
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
C$ |
29.39 |
|
|
C$ |
20.35 |
|
|
US$ |
18.75 |
|
|
US$ |
13.25 |
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
C$ |
23.48 |
|
|
C$ |
14.50 |
|
|
US$ |
14.46 |
|
|
US$ |
9.00 |
|
December 31, 2002
|
|
C$ |
20.50 |
|
|
C$ |
12.87 |
|
|
US$ |
16.15 |
|
|
US$ |
8.91 |
|
December 31, 2001
|
|
C$ |
14.25 |
|
|
C$ |
7.25 |
|
|
US$ |
26.00 |
|
|
US$ |
7.26 |
|
December 31, 2000
|
|
C$ |
8.00 |
|
|
C$ |
5.25 |
|
|
US$ |
8.50 |
|
|
US$ |
3.06 |
|
33
The table below sets forth the high and low sale prices for each
of the six most recent full calendar months for Stantec common
shares as reported on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the high
and low bid prices for each of the six most recent full calendar
months for Keith common stock on the Nasdaq National Market. The
Toronto Stock Exchange sale prices of Stantec common shares are
presented in Canadian dollars and Keith common stock bid prices
are presented in U.S. dollars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stantec | |
|
Keith | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
July 2005
|
|
C$ |
32.65 |
|
|
C$ |
29.85 |
|
|
US$ |
22.09 |
|
|
US$ |
21.10 |
|
June 2005
|
|
C$ |
32.99 |
|
|
C$ |
30.20 |
|
|
US$ |
22.25 |
|
|
US$ |
20.75 |
|
May 2005
|
|
C$ |
30.70 |
|
|
C$ |
28.02 |
|
|
US$ |
21.56 |
|
|
US$ |
20.35 |
|
April 2005
|
|
C$ |
29.45 |
|
|
C$ |
27.65 |
|
|
US$ |
21.33 |
|
|
US$ |
16.25 |
|
March 2005
|
|
C$ |
29.25 |
|
|
C$ |
27.32 |
|
|
US$ |
17.35 |
|
|
US$ |
16.40 |
|
February 2005
|
|
C$ |
28.00 |
|
|
C$ |
24.61 |
|
|
US$ |
17.15 |
|
|
US$ |
15.25 |
|
The closing sale prices of Stantec common shares as reported on
the Toronto Stock Exchange on April 14, 2005, the last
trading day before the public announcement of the merger, and
August 17, 2005, the last practicable trading day before
the distribution of this proxy statement/prospectus were
US$23.15 and US$32.52, respectively, converted from Canadian
dollars to U.S. dollars at the inverse of the noon buying
rate quoted by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on such
trading day. The closing bid price of Keith common shares as
reported on by the Nasdaq National Market on April 14,
2005, the last trading day before the public announcement of the
merger, and August 17, 2005, the last practicable trading
day before the distribution of this proxy statement/prospectus
were US$16.85 and US$23.60, respectively. We urge you to obtain
current market quotations for both the Stantec common shares and
the Keith common stock.
34
Managements Discussion and Analysis of the Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of Stantec
The following discussion is based upon, should be read in
conjunction with and is qualified by our consolidated financial
statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this
proxy statement/ prospectus. Our financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP, which differ from
financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
For a further discussion of these differences, see note 21
to our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this
proxy statement/ prospectus. The following discussion includes
certain forward-looking statements. For a discussion of
important factors, including the continuing development of our
business and other factors which could cause actual results to
differ materially from the results referred to in the
forward-looking statements, see Risk Factors and
Forward-Looking Statements.
Overview
We provide professional consulting services in planning,
engineering, architecture, interior design, landscape
architecture, surveying, environmental sciences project
management and project economics for infrastructure and
facilities projects. Our goal is to become a top 10 global
design and consulting services firm with C$1 billion in
annual revenue by the year 2008. To achieve this objective, we
will continue to deliver fee-for-service professional services
in the US$50 billion infrastructure and facilities market
through our focused, sustainable business model. Our
three-dimensional model which is based on
diversifying our operations in distinct geographic regions,
specializing in distinct but complementary practice areas, and
providing services in all five phases of the infrastructure and
facilities project life cycle allows us to manage
risk while continuing to increase our revenue and earnings.
Geographic Diversification. We currently have operations
in five economic regions in Canada and the United States as well
as a project presence in the Caribbean and other selected
international locations. Our strategy for geographic
diversification has two components. The first component is to
grow our existing regional operations by expanding our services
particularly in areas where we have not yet reached a mature
market presence. We target to achieve a market penetration of
C$10 million in revenue per one million population in
these regions. The second component includes expansion outside
our existing regions principally in the United States and
Canada. We expect to continue to expand geographically primarily
by acquiring firms that meet our integration criteria and to a
lesser extent by growing organically.
Practice Area Specialization. Specialization and
diversification of services are achieved by providing services
in 17 distinct practice areas that can generally be grouped
into five key practice areas buildings, environment,
industrial, transportation, and urban land. Focusing on this
combination of project services helps differentiate us from our
competitors, allowing us to enhance our presence in new
geographic regions and markets and to establish and maintain
client relationships. Our strategy for strengthening this
dimension of our business model is to increase the depth of our
expertise in our current practice areas and to selectively add
complementary practice areas to our operations.
Life Cycle Solutions. We seek to provide professional
services in all five phases of the project life
cycle planning, design, construction, maintenance,
and decommissioning. This inclusive approach allows us to
deliver services during periods of strong new capital project
activity, such as design and construction, as well as periods of
lower new capital project expenditures, such as maintenance and
rehabilitation. Beginning with the planning and design stages,
we provide conceptual and detailed design services, conduct
feasibility studies, and prepare plans and specifications.
During the construction phase, we generally act as the
owners representative, providing project management,
surveying, and resident engineering services. We focus
principally on fee-for-service type work and generally do not
act as the contractor or take on construction risk. Following
project completion, during the maintenance stage, we provide
ongoing professional services for maintenance and rehabilitation
in areas such as facilities and infrastructure management,
facilities operations, and performance engineering. Finally, in
the decommissioning phase, we provide solutions and
recommendations for taking facilities out of active service.
Through our One Team. Infinite Solutions. approach
to our business, we are able to undertake infrastructure and
facilities projects of any size for both public and private
sector clients. Currently, the
35
majority of assignments we pursue are small to midsize projects
with a capital value of less than C$100 million and
potential project fees for Stantec of less than
C$10 million. These types of projects represent the largest
share of the infrastructure and facilities market. Focusing on
this project mix continues to ensure that we do not rely on a
few large, single projects for our revenue and that no single
client or project accounts for more than 5% of our overall
business.
Key Performance Drivers
Our performance depends on our ability to attract and retain
qualified people, make the most of market opportunities, find,
acquire, and integrate firms and/ or new employees into our
operations, finance our growth, and achieve top-three market
penetration in the geographic areas we serve. Based on our
success with these drivers, we believe that we are well
positioned to continue to be a major provider of professional
design and consulting services in our principal geographic
regions.
People. Because we are a professional services firm, the
most important driver of our performance is our people. Our
employees create the project solutions we deliver to clients.
Thus, to achieve our goal of becoming a top 10 global
design firm, we must grow our workforce through a combination of
internal hiring and acquisitions. We measure our success in this
area by total staff numbers. In 2004 our staff increased to
approximately 4,350 from 3,700 in 2003. Currently, our workforce
is made up of about 2,150 professionals, 1,550 technical staff
and 650 support personnel. We expect our employee numbers
to continue to increase in 2005 and beyond as we pursue our
growth plan.
To attract and retain qualified staff, we offer opportunities to
be part of a multidiscipline team working on challenging
projects with some of the best people in our industry. We are
continually strengthening our people-oriented culture, and in
2004 we completed a number of activities, including revising our
career development and performance review process to enhance our
focus on career development, and modifying and realigning our
benefits programs to provide more personal choice and emphasize
wellness and preventative care. These programs will be
implemented in 2005. In addition, improved and enhanced staff
training programs are slated for introduction in the second half
of 2005.
Because of our diversified portfolio approach to
business operating in different regions and practice
areas we are generally able to redeploy a portion of
our workforce when faced with changes in local, regional, or
national economies or practice area demand. Currently, we see no
overall shortage of qualified staff for our operations. Although
there will always be some areas where it will be difficult to
find appropriate staff during certain periods, as we increase in
size we become better able to address these issues by using
staff from other parts of the company either through temporary
relocation or changes in work allocation. We are continually
improving our ability to work on projects from multiple office
locations through Web-based technology.
Industry Environment/ Market Opportunities. Another key
driver of our success is our ability to make the most of
opportunities to grow in our marketplace. We believe that growth
is necessary in order to enhance the depth and breadth of our
expertise, broaden our services, increase our shareholder value,
provide more opportunities for our employees and lever our
information technology systems. Over the last 11 years, we
have integrated a total of approximately 3,400 employees
into our operations through a combination of direct hiring and
acquisitions. We are confident that we can continue to take
advantage of acquisition opportunities because we operate in an
industry sector that includes more than 100,000 firms and
is estimated to generate over US$50 billion in revenue in
North America every year, of which we currently have less than a
1% market share. (According to the Engineering News
Record, the largest 500 engineering and architecture
companies in the United States alone generated nearly
US$50 billion in fees in 2003.)
Acquisition and Integration. Our strategy for increasing
our market share is to combine internal growth with the
acquisition of firms that believe in our vision and want to be
part of our growing company. In 2004 we completed four
acquisitions for total consideration of C$20.3 million, one
in the United States which established a new region for us in
the Northeast, and three in Canada, adding approximately 530
employees to our operations. In 2003 we completed four
acquisitions for total consideration of C$9.4 million in
our two Canadian regions, adding approximately
225 employees to our operations. In 2002 we completed
36
10 acquisitions for total consideration of
C$38.5 million, adding approximately 550 employees to
our operations.
The integration of acquired firms begins immediately following
the acquisition closing date and may take between six months and
three years. It involves incorporation into our company-wide
information technology and financial management systems as well
as provision of back office support services from
our corporate office. This approach allows our new staff to
focus on continuing to serve clients with as little interruption
as possible.
Our acquisition program is managed by an acquisition team
dedicated to supporting our growth objectives. The team is
responsible for identifying and valuing acquisition candidates,
undertaking and coordinating due diligence, negotiating and
closing transactions, and assisting with the integration of
employees and systems.
Financing. Our success also depends on our continuing
ability to finance our growth. Adequate financing gives us the
flexibility to make appropriate investments in our future. Over
the past 11 years, we have grown at a compound annual rate
of 19%. To fund this growth, we require cash generated from both
internal and external sources. Historically, we have completed
acquisitions using mostly cash and notes, with very little use
of our common shares.
We have sought additional financing through the public sale of
shares to maintain our internal debt to equity guidelines at
times when our growth has outpaced our ability to generate cash
from operations. Our practice is to raise additional equity to
replenish our cash reserves, pay down debt, or strengthen our
balance sheet. To date, we have issued additional shares for
these purposes on three occasions in 1997, 2000 and
2002.
Market Penetration. Also key to our success is achieving
a certain level of market penetration in the geographic areas we
serve. Our goal is to be among the top three service providers
in our geographic regions and practice areas. With this level of
market presence, we are less likely to be affected by downturns
in regional economies. Top-three positioning also gives us
increased opportunities to work for the best clients, obtain the
best projects, and attract the best employees in a region, and
is important for building or maintaining the critical mass of
staff needed to generate consistent performance and support
regional infrastructure.
2004 Highlights
The results we achieved in 2004 compared to the expected ranges
established by management at the beginning of the year are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measure |
|
Expected Range | |
|
Result Achieved | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Debt to equity ratio(1)
|
|
|
At or below 0.5 to 1 |
|
|
|
<0.0 |
|
Return on equity(2)
|
|
|
At or above 14 |
% |
|
|
17.3 |
% |
Net income as % of net revenue
|
|
|
At or above 5 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
Gross margin as % of net revenue
|
|
|
Between 52 and 54 |
% |
|
|
54.2 |
% |
Administrative and marketing expenses as % of net revenue
|
|
|
Between 39 and 41 |
% |
|
|
40.9 |
% |
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
Between 36.5 and 37.5 |
% |
|
|
32.4 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
Debt to equity ratio is calculated as long-term debt plus
current portion of long-term debt plus bank indebtedness less
cash, all divided by shareholders equity. |
|
(2) |
Return on equity is calculated as net income for the year
divided by average shareholders equity over each of the
last four quarters. |
Earnings per share. Our basic earnings per share
increased 19.0% to C$1.63 from C$1.37 in 2003. Our diluted
earnings per share increased 21.4% to C$1.59 from C$1.31.
37
Effective income tax rate. Our effective tax rate
decreased to 32.4% in 2004 from 36.7% in 2003.
Growth by acquisition. We completed four acquisitions in
2004, including the addition of The Sear-Brown Group, Inc., a
New York-based firm with approximately 400 employees, the
acquisition of two architecture companies GBR
Architects Limited and Dunlop Architects Inc.and the
addition of Shaflik Engineering Ltd. through an asset purchase.
Investment in costs and estimated earnings in excess of
billings and in accounts receivable. We reduced our
investment in accounts receivable (measured by number of
days revenue) to 101 days at the end of 2004 from
119 days at the end of 2003. The implementation of our new
enterprise management system during 2003 had a significant
impact on our resources both in terms of people and
finances. Adjusting to the breadth of the new system created a
significant learning curve. One of the impacts was an initial
increase in the time required to prepare invoices to send to
clients. As a result, we experienced an increase in costs and
estimated earnings in excess of billings during the fourth
quarter of 2003.
Divestitures. In 2003 we entered into an agreement in
principle to dispose of our 50% share in Lockerbie Stanley Inc.
This agreement was finalized in Q3 04. During Q4 04,
we divested of our interest in Goodfellow
EFSOPtm
technology, which comprised our Technology segment.
Property sale. During the fourth quarter of 2004, we
completed the sale of our office building in Edmonton, Alberta,
for cash proceeds of C$34.5 million. Concurrent with the
sale, we leased the property back for a period of 15 years.
The gain of C$7.1 million realized on the sale has been
deferred and will be recognized as a reduction of rental expense
over the 15-year term of the operating lease.
Results of Operations
The following is a discussion of certain factors affecting our
results of operations for the first two quarters of 2005 and
2004 and the years ended 2004, 2003 and 2002. This discussion
should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this proxy statement/
prospectus.
First Two Quarters of 2005 Compared to First
Two Quarters of 2004
The following table summarizes key financial data for the first
two quarters of 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two Quarters Ended June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions of Canadian dollars, | |
|
|
except per share data) | |
Gross revenue
|
|
|
C$291.3 |
|
|
|
C$254.1 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
C$19.8 |
|
|
|
C$12.1 |
|
Earnings per share basic
|
|
|
C$1.05 |
|
|
|
C$0.66 |
|
Earnings per share diluted
|
|
|
C$1.02 |
|
|
|
C$0.63 |
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets as at June 30
|
|
|
C$364.6 |
|
|
|
C$362.1 |
|
Outstanding common shares as at June 30
|
|
|
18,949,286 |
|
|
|
18,476,318 |
|
Outstanding share options as at June 30
|
|
|
982,332 |
|
|
|
1,308,166 |
|
38
The following table summarizes our key operating results on a
percentage of net revenue basis and the percentage increase in
the dollar amount of these results for the first two quarters of
2005 compared to the first two quarters of 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two Quarters Ended June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Percentage of Net | |
|
|
|
|
Revenue | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
|
Increase | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 vs. 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Gross revenue
|
|
|
118.0% |
|
|
|
114.3% |
|
|
|
14.6 |
% |
Net revenue
|
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
Direct payroll costs
|
|
|
44.3% |
|
|
|
46.2% |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
Gross margin
|
|
|
55.7% |
|
|
|
53.8% |
|
|
|
15.0 |
% |
Administrative and marketing expenses
|
|
|
40.8% |
|
|
|
41.9% |
|
|
|
8.2 |
% |
Depreciation of property and equipment
|
|
|
2.3% |
|
|
|
2.5% |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
0.2% |
|
|
|
0.3% |
|
|
|
(28.6 |
)% |
Net interest expense
|
|
|
0.1% |
|
|
|
0.7% |
|
|
|
(88.7 |
)% |
Foreign exchange losses
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Share of income from associated companies
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
|
|
0.1% |
|
|
|
(47.6 |
)% |
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
12.3% |
|
|
|
8.5% |
|
|
|
61.1 |
% |
Income taxes
|
|
|
4.3% |
|
|
|
3.1% |
|
|
|
56.6 |
% |
Net income for the period
|
|
|
8.0% |
|
|
|
5.4% |
|
|
|
63.6 |
% |
Gross Revenue. The following table summarizes the impact
of acquisitions, internal growth and foreign exchange on our
gross revenue for the first two quarters of 2005 compared to the
first two quarters of 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Two Quarters | |
Gross Revenue |
|
2005 vs. 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands of | |
|
|
Canadian dollars) | |
Increase (decrease) in gross revenue due to:
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions completed in current and prior two years
|
|
C$ |
37,446 |
|
Net internal growth
|
|
|
7,545 |
|
Impact of foreign exchange rates on revenue earned by foreign
subsidiaries
|
|
|
(7,815 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total increase in gross revenue
|
|
C$ |
37,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
The net increase in gross revenue was C$37.2 million for
the first two quarters of 2005 over the first
two quarters of 2004 due to growth from acquisitions of
C$37.4 million and internal growth of C$7.5 million,
offset by the impact of foreign exchange rates on revenue earned
by foreign subsidiaries of C$7.7 million.
The following table summarizes gross revenue by practice area
for the first two quarters of 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Two Quarters | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
% of Consulting | |
|
|
|
% of Consulting | |
Practice Area |
|
|
|
Services Gross | |
|
% Change | |
|
|
|
Services Gross | |
Gross Revenue |
|
2005 | |
|
Revenue | |
|
2005 vs. 2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Revenue | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(millions of C$) | |
|
|
|
|
|
(millions of C$) | |
|
|
Environment
|
|
C$ |
50.1 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
(8.6 |
)% |
|
C$ |
54.8 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
% |
Buildings
|
|
|
77.9 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
|
50.6 |
% |
|
|
51.7 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
Transportation
|
|
|
45.6 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
43.1 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
Urban Land
|
|
|
91.4 |
|
|
|
31.4 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
83.9 |
|
|
|
33.1 |
|
Industrial
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
% |
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting Services
|
|
C$ |
291.4 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
C$ |
253.6 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
As indicated above, gross revenue earned is impacted by
acquisitions completed in the current and prior two years, net
internal growth and foreign exchange rates on revenue earned by
foreign subsidiaries. The impact of these factors on gross
revenue earned by practice area is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD Q2 2005 Compared to YTD Q2 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Change | |
|
Change due to Net | |
Practice Area |
|
Total | |
|
due to | |
|
Internal Growth and | |
Gross Revenue |
|
Change | |
|
Acquisitions | |
|
Foreign Exchange | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions of C$) | |
Environment
|
|
C$ |
(4.7 |
) |
|
C$ |
1.8 |
|
|
C$ |
(6.5 |
) |
Buildings
|
|
C$ |
26.2 |
|
|
C$ |
22.3 |
|
|
C$ |
3.9 |
|
Transportation
|
|
C$ |
2.5 |
|
|
C$ |
2.5 |
|
|
C$ |
0.0 |
|
Urban Land
|
|
C$ |
7.5 |
|
|
C$ |
1.6 |
|
|
C$ |
5.9 |
|
Industrial
|
|
C$ |
6.3 |
|
|
C$ |
9.2 |
|
|
C$ |
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting Services
|
|
C$ |
37.8 |
|
|
C$ |
37.4 |
|
|
C$ |
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following summarizes the acquisitions completed in 2003
through 2005 that impacted each of the practice areas:
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental practice area: The Sear-Brown Group
Inc. April 2004; and Ecological Services
Inc. May 2003. |
|
|
|
Buildings practice area: GBR Architects Limited May
2004; Dunlop Architects Inc. October 2004; The
Sear-Brown Group Inc. April 2004; and APAI
Architecture Inc. and Mandalian Enterprises Limited
January 2003. |
|
|
|
Transportation, Urban Land and Industrial practice areas: The
Sear-Brown Group Inc. April 2004. |
During the last half of 2004, certain of our environmental
services operations were down-sized through staff reductions,
resulting in a reduction in the level of revenue generated in
the first half of 2005 compared to 2004.
Gross Margin. Gross margin as a percentage of net revenue
achieved during the first two quarters of 2005 compared to
the first two quarters of 2004 was 55.7% and 53.8%,
respectively. During 2005, we implemented a fixed rate
disbursement process as a means of simplifying the recovery of
administrative disbursements related to billable projects. The
impact of this change over the first half of 2005 resulted in an
increase of approximately 0.4% in overall gross margin. The
information available from our new enterprise management system
has contributed to improved project management and enhanced
gross margin. There will continue to be fluctuations in the
margins reported from quarter to quarter as a result of the mix
of projects in progress during any quarter.
The following table shows gross margins by practice area for the
first two quarters of 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Two | |
|
|
Quarters | |
|
|
| |
Practice Area Gross Margin |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Environment
|
|
|
55.2 |
% |
|
|
55.0 |
% |
Buildings
|
|
|
54.7 |
% |
|
|
52.8 |
% |
Transportation
|
|
|
55.9 |
% |
|
|
53.4 |
% |
Urban Land
|
|
|
57.9 |
% |
|
|
55.4 |
% |
Industrial
|
|
|
48.4 |
% |
|
|
46.7 |
% |
Consolidated gross margin
|
|
|
55.7 |
% |
|
|
53.8 |
% |
Gross margin percentages have increased in all practice areas in
the first two quarters of 2005 compared to the first two
quarters of 2004. This is consistent with expectations and is
attributable to the same factors noted above.
40
Administrative and Marketing Expenses. Administrative and
marketing expenses as a percentage of net revenue were 40.8% for
the first two quarters of 2005, compared to 41.9% for the
first two quarters of 2004 and to our expectation of
between 40% and 42% for fiscal 2005. Administrative and
marketing expenses may fluctuate from period to period as a
result of the amount of staff time charged to marketing and
administrative labor, which is influenced by the mix of projects
in progress and being pursued during the period. We reduced our
estimate for allowance for doubtful accounts by
C$4.0 million which resulted in a 1.6% reduction in
administrative and marketing expenses on a year-to-date basis.
As well, the acquisition of The Sear-Brown Group, Inc. in Q2 04
resulted in additional costs associated with implementing an
operating structure in a new region. The costs reported in the
first two quarters of 2005 are more reflective of our expected
levels of administrative and marketing expenses (excluding the
allowance for doubtful accounts adjustment) and are consistent
with the levels reported in earlier years.
Depreciation of Property and Equipment. Depreciation of
property and equipment as a percentage of net revenue for the
first two quarters of 2005 decreased to 2.3% compared to
2.5% in the first two quarters of 2004. The reduction in
the depreciation expense as a percentage of net revenue relates
primarily to the sale of our Edmonton office building during Q4
04, partially offset by an increase from acquisitions completed
during 2004 combined with the depreciation expense associated
with normal asset additions. Year over year, depreciation
expense remained relatively constant, resulting in a reduction
as a percentage of an increasing net revenue base.
Amortization of Intangible Assets. The timing of
completed acquisitions, as well as the type of intangible assets
acquired, impacts the amount of amortization of intangible
assets. Client relationships and other intangible assets are
amortized over estimated useful lives ranging from 10 to
15 years, whereas contract backlog is amortized over an
estimated useful life of generally less than one year. As a
result, the impact of amortization of contract backlog can be
significant in the two to three quarters following an
acquisition. During the first two quarters of 2005,
C$50,000 of the amortization expense recorded related to
contract backlog (C$278,000 first two quarters
of 2004) and C$376,000 related to client relationships and other
intangible assets (C$319,000 first two quarters
of 2004). The increase of intangible assets related to both The
Sear-Brown Group Inc. and Dunlop Architects Inc. acquisitions.
As at June 30, 2005, contract backlog was fully amortized.
Net Interest Expense. The reduction of C$1.3 million
in net interest expense in the first two quarters of 2005
compared to the first two quarters of 2004 was a result of
maintaining a positive cash position throughout the first
two quarters of 2005 compared to bank indebtedness of
C$34.2 million at June 30, 2004. In addition, our
total long-term debt position throughout the 2005 period was
less than it was throughout the 2004 period, which contributed
to the reduction in overall interest expense.
Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate for the first
two quarters of 2005 was 35.0%, compared to 32.4% for the
year ended December 31, 2004. Our estimated income tax rate
is adjusted quarterly, based on changes in statutory rates in
the jurisdictions in which we operate as well as on our
estimated earnings in each of these jurisdictions. For 2005 we
are expecting an increase in the proportion of income earned by
our US operations. Because the U.S. has higher statutory income
tax rates than Canada, our estimated overall effective income
tax rate for 2005 has increased over 2004.
41
2004 Compared to 2003 and 2002
In 2004 we disposed of our operations that previously made up
our design build and technology segments. As a result, all of
our operations are now reported in one segment
consulting services. The following table summarizes key
financial data for 2004, 2003 and 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions of Canadian dollars, | |
|
|
except per share data) | |
Gross revenue
|
|
|
520.9 |
|
|
|
459.9 |
|
|
|
428.5 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
30.2 |
|
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
Earnings per share basic
|
|
|
1.63 |
|
|
|
1.37 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
Earnings per share diluted
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
1.31 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
362.1 |
|
|
|
326.6 |
|
|
|
299.0 |
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
34.0 |
|
|
|
44.6 |
|
|
|
62.3 |
|
Outstanding common shares as at December 31
|
|
|
18,871,085 |
|
|
|
18,327,284 |
|
|
|
18,282,720 |
|
Outstanding share options as at December 31
|
|
|
1,071,333 |
|
|
|
1,479,100 |
|
|
|
1,296,200 |
|
The information reflected above is impacted by the four
acquisitions we completed in 2004, the four completed in 2003,
and the 10 completed in 2002. Each of these acquisitions
increased the gross revenue and net income in the year of
acquisition and subsequent years.
In the course of providing services, we incur certain direct
costs for subconsultants, equipment, and other expenditures that
are recoverable directly from our clients. The revenue
associated with these direct costs is included in our gross
revenue. Since such direct costs and their associated revenue
can vary significantly from contract to contract, changes in our
gross revenue may not be indicative of our revenue trends.
Accordingly, we also report net revenue, which is gross revenue
less subconsultant and other direct expenses, and analyze our
results in relation to net revenue rather than gross revenue.
The following table summarizes our key operating results on a
percentage of net revenue basis and the percentage increase in
the dollar amount of these results from year to year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Net Revenue | |
|
Percentage Increase | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
2004 vs. | |
|
2003 vs. | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Gross revenue
|
|
|
116.0 |
% |
|
|
117.5 |
% |
|
|
117.3 |
% |
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
Net revenue
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
|
7.2 |
% |
Direct payroll costs
|
|
|
45.8 |
% |
|
|
46.9 |
% |
|
|
47.6 |
% |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
Gross margin
|
|
|
54.2 |
% |
|
|
53.1 |
% |
|
|
52.4 |
% |
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
Administrative and marketing expenses
|
|
|
40.9 |
% |
|
|
39.5 |
% |
|
|
39.9 |
% |
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
Depreciation of property and equipment
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
20.9 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
(14.3 |
)% |
Net interest expense
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
Foreign exchange (gains) losses
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(115.3 |
)% |
|
|
743.9 |
% |
Share of income from associated companies
|
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
(33.6 |
)% |
|
|
63.4 |
% |
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
9.9 |
% |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
19.7 |
% |
Income taxes
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
|
|
12.8 |
% |
Net income
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
20.4 |
% |
|
|
24.2 |
% |
As indicated in the highlights above, our operating results for
2004 are generally consistent with the goals we established in
2003. In particular, our administrative and marketing expenses
were within the range
42
we expected to achieve, while our gross margin slightly exceeded
expectations. In addition, our effective tax rate continued to
fall and, for 2004, was below the expected range due to factors
discussed below.
Gross and Net Revenue. The following tables summarize the
impact of acquisitions, internal growth and foreign exchange on
our gross and net revenue for 2004 compared to 2003 and for 2003
compared to 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 vs. 2003 | |
|
2003 vs. 2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Gross revenue (in millions of Canadian dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) due to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions completed in current and prior two years
|
|
C$ |
42.3 |
|
|
C$ |
41.0 |
|
Net internal growth
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Impact of foreign exchange
|
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
|
|
(19.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase over prior year
|
|
C$ |
61.0 |
|
|
C$ |
31.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 vs. 2003 | |
|
2003 vs. 2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net revenue (in millions of Canadian dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) due to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions completed in current and prior two years
|
|
C$ |
36.4 |
|
|
C$ |
36.7 |
|
Net internal growth
|
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
Impact of foreign exchange
|
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
|
|
(17.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase over prior year
|
|
C$ |
57.8 |
|
|
C$ |
26.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenue earned in Canada during 2004 increased to
C$325.8 million from C$290.4 million in 2003 and
C$238.8 million in 2002. Gross revenue generated in the
United States increased to C$190.4 million in 2004 compared
to C$161.6 million in 2003 and C$180.3 million in
2002. Gross revenue earned outside of Canada and the United
States in 2004 was C$4.7 million, compared to
C$7.9 million in 2003 and C$9.4 million in 2002. As
indicated above, the increase value of the Canadian dollar
compared to the U.S. dollar adversely impacted gross revenue
from our U.S. operations by C$11.3 million. This decrease
was offset by the acquisition of The Sear-Brown Group, Inc. in
April of 2004, which resulted in an overall increase in our
U.S.-generated revenue. The continuing strength of the Canadian
economy also resulted in growth in revenue generated in Canada
in 2004.
The following table summarizes gross revenue by practice area
for 2004, 2003 and 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
|
Consulting | |
|
% Change | |
|
|
|
Consulting | |
|
% Change | |
|
|
|
Consulting | |
Practice Area |
|
|
|
Services | |
|
2004 vs. | |
|
|
|
Services | |
|
2003 vs. | |
|
|
|
Services | |
Gross Revenue |
|
2004 | |
|
Gross Revenue | |
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
Gross Revenue | |
|
2002 | |
|
2002 | |
|
Gross Revenue | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(millions | |
|
|
|
|
|
(millions | |
|
|
|
|
|
(millions | |
|
|
|
|
of C$) | |
|
|
|
|
|
of C$) | |
|
|
|
|
|
of C$) | |
|
|
Environment
|
|
C$ |
105.5 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
% |
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
C$ |
91.8 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
23.8 |
% |
|
C$ |
74.1 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
% |
Buildings
|
|
|
107.5 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
% |
|
|
89.9 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
% |
|
|
77.3 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
Transportation
|
|
|
92.6 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
80.5 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
80.6 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
Urban Land
|
|
|
168.9 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
159.9 |
|
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
156.9 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
Industrial
|
|
|
45.4 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
36.2 |
% |
|
|
33.3 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
(4.9 |
)% |
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting Services
|
|
C$ |
519.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
14.1 |
% |
|
C$ |
455.4 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
C$ |
423.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
As indicated above, gross revenue earned is impacted by
acquisitions completed in the current and prior two years, net
internal growth and foreign exchange rates on revenue earned by
foreign subsidiaries. The impact of these factors on gross
revenue earned by practice area is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Compared to 2003 | |
|
2003 Compared to 2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Change Due to | |
|
|
|
Change Due to | |
|
|
|
|
Change | |
|
Net Internal | |
|
|
|
Change | |
|
Net Internal | |
Practice Area |
|
Total | |
|
Due to | |
|
Growth and | |
|
Total | |
|
Due to | |
|
Growth and | |
Gross Revenue |
|
Change | |
|
Acquisitions | |
|
Foreign Exchange | |
|
Change | |
|
Acquisitions | |
|
Foreign Exchange | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions of C$) | |
|
(In millions of C$) | |
Environment
|
|
C$ |
13.7 |
|
|
C$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
C$ |
13.8 |
|
|
C$ |
17.7 |
|
|
C$ |
23.0 |
|
|
C$ |
(5.3 |
) |
Buildings
|
|
C$ |
17.6 |
|
|
C$ |
11.7 |
|
|
C$ |
5.9 |
|
|
C$ |
12.6 |
|
|
C$ |
16.3 |
|
|
C$ |
(3.7 |
) |
Transportation
|
|
C$ |
12.1 |
|
|
C$ |
11.4 |
|
|
C$ |
0.7 |
|
|
C$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
C$ |
0.0 |
|
|
C$ |
(0.1 |
) |
Urban Land
|
|
C$ |
9.0 |
|
|
C$ |
6.3 |
|
|
C$ |
2.7 |
|
|
C$ |
3.0 |
|
|
C$ |
5.9 |
|
|
C$ |
(2.9 |
) |
Industrial
|
|
C$ |
12.1 |
|
|
C$ |
13.0 |
|
|
C$ |
(0.9 |
) |
|
C$ |
(1.7 |
) |
|
C$ |
(4.2 |
) |
|
C$ |
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting Services
|
|
C$ |
64.5 |
|
|
C$ |
42.3 |
|
|
C$ |
22.2 |
|
|
C$ |
31.5 |
|
|
C$ |
41.0 |
|
|
C$ |
(9.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following summarizes the acquisitions completed in 2002
through 2004 that impacted each of the practice areas:
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental practice area: The Sear-Brown Group
Inc. April 2004; Ecological Services
Inc. May 2003; Graeme & Murray Consultants
Ltd. April 2002; GeoViro Engineering
Ltd. May 2002; Site Consultants,
Inc. June 2002; and Beak International
Incorporated. October 2002. |
|
|
|
Buildings practice area: GBR Architects Limited May
2004; Dunlop Architects Inc. October 2004; The
Sear-Brown Group Inc. April 2004; APAI Architecture
Inc. and Mandalian Enterprises Limited January 2003;
and McCartan Consulting Ltd. January 2002. |
|
|
|
Transportation practice area: The Sear-Brown Group
Inc. April 2004. |
|
|
|
Urban Land practice area: The Sear-Brown Group Inc.
April 2004; Webster and Simmonds Surveying Ltd.
February 2002; and Cosburn Patterson Mather Limited
February 2002. |
|
|
|
Industrial practice area: The Sear-Brown Group Inc.
April 2004; and GKO Engineering March 2002. |
Gross Margin. Gross margin is calculated as the
difference of net revenue minus direct payroll costs, expressed
as a percentage of net revenue. Direct payroll costs include the
cost of salaries and related fringe benefits for labor hours
that are directly associated with the completion of projects.
Labor costs and related fringe benefits for labor hours that are
not directly associated with the completion of projects are
included in administrative and marketing expenses. Gross margin
increased to 54.2% in 2004 from 53.1% in 2003 and 52.4% in 2002.
The increase in our gross margin is due to the lower proportion
of total labor that was charged to projects during 2004 compared
to 2003 and 2002 as well as the mix of projects in progress and
being pursued throughout the year. Total labor costs as a
percentage of net revenue are consistent from 2003 to 2004 at
approximately 67.4% for both years.
The following table summarizes gross margins by practice area
for 2004, 2003 and 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Practice Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Environment
|
|
|
55.2% |
|
|
|
53.4% |
|
|
|
54.5% |
|
Buildings
|
|
|
53.1% |
|
|
|
53.0% |
|
|
|
52.9% |
|
Transportation
|
|
|
56.0% |
|
|
|
52.4% |
|
|
|
52.0% |
|
Urban Land
|
|
|
55.6% |
|
|
|
54.4% |
|
|
|
54.1% |
|
Industrial
|
|
|
46.4% |
|
|
|
46.7% |
|
|
|
35.0% |
|
Gross margins have been relatively stable across practice areas
in the past three years, with some marginal improvements in our
transportation, urban land and industrial practice areas. In
2004, transportation and urban land practice area gross margins
increased over 2003 gross margins by 3.6% and 1.2%,
44
respectively, primarily as a result of the type and size of the
projects undertaken by these practice areas during 2004 and an
increase in billing rates.
In 2002, the acquisition of GKO Engineering impacted the
Industrial practice area. Gross margins were lower due to costs
associated with completing acquired projects with insufficient
remaining budgets.
Administrative and Marketing Expenses. Administrative and
marketing expenses as a percentage of net revenue for 2004 were
40.9% (within the expected range of 39 to 41% for these
expenses), compared to 39.5% in 2003 and 39.9% in 2002.
Administrative and marketing expenses fluctuate as a result of
the amount of staff time charged to marketing and administrative
labor, which is influenced by the mix of projects in progress
and being pursued throughout the year. In 2004 a higher
proportion of total labor was charged to administrative and
marketing labor compared to 2003 and 2002.
Depreciation of Property and Equipment. Depreciation of
property and equipment as a percentage of net revenue increased
to 2.7% in 2004, compared to 2.5% for 2003 and 2.6% in 2002. In
2004 we began depreciating our new enterprise management system
as well as our new office building in Edmonton, Alberta.
Foreign Exchange (Gains) Losses. We recorded a foreign
exchange gain of C$0.1 million in 2004, compared to a
foreign exchange loss of C$0.6 million in 2003 and
C$0.1 million in 2002. The foreign exchange gains and
losses reported in 2004, 2003 and 2002 arose on the translation
of the foreign-denominated assets and liabilities held in our
Canadian companies and foreign subsidiaries (excluding our U.S.
subsidiaries). While there was periodic weakening in the
Canadian dollar in 2002, in 2003 the Canadian dollar rose from
US$0.63 at the beginning of the year to US$0.77 at the end of
the year, and the impact of this significant change on our
overall exposure to foreign currency assets resulted in an
exchange loss of C$0.6 million. In 2004 the Canadian dollar
continued to strengthen to US$0.83. To minimize our exposure to
foreign currency fluctuations, we used U.S. dollar-denominated
debt in 2003 and through most of 2004, and late in 2004, with
the improvement of our cash position, we were able to reduce the
amount of this debt. As a result, we entered into forward
contracts to sell U.S. dollars in exchange for Canadian dollars
to minimize our exposure to currency fluctuations. At
December 31, 2004, we had contracted to sell
US$10.0 million at forward rates ranging from C$1.2050 to
C$1.2386.
Income Taxes. The effective income tax rate for Stantec
in 2004 was 32.4%, compared to 36.7% in 2003 and 39.0% in 2002.
At the beginning of 2004, we anticipated that our effective tax
rate would be in the range of 36.5 to 37.5%. This rate was
estimated based on known statutory rate reductions as well as
estimates of income in each of our taxing jurisdictions.
Throughout 2004, the effective tax rate reported in each quarter
was reduced to account for the 0.75% reduction in provincial
statutory rates during the year as well as to reflect increases
in earnings in some of our lower tax rate jurisdictions. During
the fourth quarter of 2004, on the basis of an actuarial report,
we reflected additional income in our regulated insurance
subsidiary. A portion of that income of the subsidiary is
subject to tax at lower rates, contributing 1.2% to the
reduction of our consolidated tax rate.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Working capital (current assets less current liabilities) as of
June 30, 2005 was C$98.2 million, compared to
C$82.0 million as of December 31, 2004. Current assets
decreased by C$2.3 million, and current liabilities
decreased by C$18.5 million. The majority of the decrease
in current assets was due to the reduction in cash and cash
equivalents caused by the timing of committed cash outflows that
occur during the first quarter of each year, such as the payment
of employee incentive bonuses and fiscal year-end tax
liabilities. We began the 2004 fiscal year with
C$7.3 million in cash. However, as a result of the
implementation of our enterprise management system in Q4 03 and
the significant increase in our investment in costs and
estimated earnings in excess of billings into Q1 2004, we
increased the use of our operating line in Q1 2004 by
C$15.3 million through short-term bank financing. By the
end of 2004, we had achieved a significant reduction in our
investment in costs and estimated earnings in excess of
billings, which allowed us to repay this short-term debt. This
improvement, as well as the net cash proceeds received on the
sale of our Edmonton office building late in 2004, resulted in a
cash position of C$37.9 million at the beginning of 2005.
The net
45
decrease in cash of C$19.0 million during Q1 2005 was due
primarily to the timing of committed cash outflows that occur
during the first quarter of each year, particularly the payment
of employee incentive bonuses and fiscal year-end tax
liabilities.
Cash flows from operating activities were C$12.5 million
during the first two quarters of 2005, compared to
C$16.1 million in the first two quarters of 2004. This
change was mainly due to an increase of C$16.7 million in
income taxes paid, offset by a net of C$11.9 million in
increased cash receipts from clients less cash paid to suppliers
and employees. Income taxes payable at the end of 2003 were
lower than normal due to the high level of investment in costs
and estimated earnings in excess of billings at that time. This
resulted in lower income tax payments in Q1 04 as well as
lower income tax installment requirements for 2004. Our income
tax payments in 2005 increased over 2004 to cover the higher
income tax liability outstanding at the end of 2004 as well as
the increased income tax installments required for 2005.
Our cash flow from operating activities was C$77.4 million
in 2004, compared to C$16.9 million in 2003 and
C$36.1 million in 2002. The implementation of our new
enterprise management system in the fourth quarter of 2003
contributed to the significant reduction in cash flows from
operating activities for the year. The reduction in our
investment in costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings
and in accounts receivable from 119 to 101 days during 2004
was the primary reason for the increased cash flow in 2004.
Maintaining and slightly improving this level of investment
should continue to provide adequate funds to finance our working
capital requirements.
We provide allowances on our accounts receivable based on the
probability of collection as well as the age of the receivable.
We perform a review of collections subsequent to the period end
to adjust the provisions for known collections for accounts
provided for. During the period 2002 through 2004, the provision
for doubtful accounts as a percentage of accounts receivable has
continued to fall as our collection procedures and our billing
cycles became more refined. We generally expect that costs and
estimated earnings in excess of billings will be invoiced within
a month to 90 days from the provision of services and have
included terms on invoices to clients that accounts are due upon
receipt or net 30 days. The implementation of the new
enterprise management system has provided us with additional
tools and information that should translate into improved
collections on older accounts receivable and reduced impact of
these charges on our operating results.
In 2004, C$10.2 million in cash was used in investing
activities, compared to C$33.5 million in 2003 and
C$29.2 million in 2002. A number of significant investing
activities occurred during 2004, including the sale of our
Edmonton office building, the sale of our interest in Goodfellow
EFSOPtm
technology, the completion of our largest acquisition to date,
and our investment in short-term investments related to
self-insured liabilities arising on the implementation of our
regulated insurance company. In 2003 our investment activities
included investment in our new enterprise management system,
investment in construction costs associated with an addition to
our Edmonton office building, and investment in four
acquisitions. The net impact of these various investment
activities was to decrease the amount of cash used in 2004 from
2003 by C$23.3 million. We completed fewer acquisitions in
2003 than in 2002, resulting in a net decrease in cash expended
on acquisitions of approximately C$11.4 million. This
difference was offset by an increased investment in property and
equipment of C$11.3 million in 2003 compared to 2002. The
implementation of our new business information system, the
construction of the Stantec Atrium Tower in Edmonton, and
continued renovations to Stantec Centre in Edmonton accounted
for this additional investment. The remaining difference is the
amount of proceeds received in 2002 on the disposition of our
minority interest in Linnet Geomatics International Inc. and on
the divestiture of our 50-person operation in Gatineau, Quebec.
As a professional services organization, we are not capital
intensive. Our capital expenditures have historically been
primarily for property and equipment that includes such items as
computer equipment and business information systems software,
furniture, leasehold improvements and other office and field
equipment. As indicated above, the largest capital expenditures
incurred in 2002 through 2004 relate to the construction of the
addition to the Edmonton office building, the renovations to the
original Edmonton office building, the costs associated with the
implementation of our new business information system, and
leasehold improvements incurred on new office space. Other
normal capital expenditures accounted for approximately
46
C$10.8 million, C$9.2 million and C$7.8 million
in each of 2002, 2003 and 2004. We expect our capital
expenditures in 2005 to be approximately C$16.0 million to
C$18.0 million that includes improvements to our Winnipeg
office building and upgrades to a number of our desktop
computers to support updated versions of certain application and
operating system software. Our capital expenditures were
C$8.2 million for the first two quarters of 2005. This
was within the expected range for 2005 to support ongoing
operational activity. During the first two quarters of 2005, our
capital expenditures were financed by cash flows from operations.
Share options exercised for cash during the first two quarters
of 2005 generated cash of C$535,000, compared to C$918,000 for
the same period in 2004. We used C$36.0 million in
financing activities in 2004, compared to the use of
C$4.2 million in 2003 and the generation of
C$14.9 million in 2002. Additional funds received in 2004
on the exercise of share options, as well as the net decrease in
funds used to repurchase shares under our Normal Course Issuer
Bid, were offset by the use of funds to pay down our bank
indebtedness and long-term borrowings. This bank indebtedness
had been incurred in 2003 and early 2004 to finance the level of
investment in accounts receivable and in costs and estimated
earnings in excess of billings that resulted from the
implementation of our new enterprise management system.
Improvement in the level of these investments, as well as
proceeds received on the sale of our Edmonton office building,
provided the additional funds to repay our long-term debt and
bank indebtedness. We issued 1.2 million common shares for
net cash proceeds of C$18.3 million in 2002 and borrowed
C$30.0 million on our existing acquisition credit facility.
During 2004, we renegotiated our credit facility with a major
Canadian chartered bank. Our new credit facility provides for an
operating line of credit of C$30 million. At
December 31, 2004, no borrowing had been drawn on this
facility (C$8.3 million had been drawn at December 31,
2003 and none at December 31, 2002). We also maintain a
US$17.0 million acquisition credit facility, which was
unused at December 31, 2004, and a four-year reducing U.S.
dollar-denominated term facility, of which C$24.0 million
was used at December 31, 2004 (C$19.2 million had been
used at December 31, 2003). The credit facility requires us
to satisfy the following specified financial ratios and tests:
(1) the debt to EBITDA ratio must not exceed 2.50 to 1.0 at
any time (EBITDA is defined in the credit facility as, for any
period, net income for such period plus all amounts deducted in
the calculation thereof on account of interest expense, income
taxes, depreciation and amortization); (2) the EBITDAR to
debt service ratio must not be less than 1.35 to 1.0 at any time
(EBITDAR is defined in the credit facility as, in respect of any
period, an amount equal to EBITDA plus triple net building
operating lease expenses); (3) shareholders equity
must be greater than or equal to 90% of the prior fiscal year
ending shareholders equity plus 50% of the positive
cumulative net income earned during the current fiscal year; and
(4) the ratio of current assets to current liabilities must
be not less than 1.25 to 1.0 at any time. We are in compliance
with all such ratios and tests.
Our shareholders equity increased C$28.6 million to
C$189.1 million at the end of 2004 from
C$160.5 million at the end of 2003. This increase resulted
from net income of C$30.2 million in 2004, the recognition
of the fair value of share-based compensation of
C$0.7 million, and the issue of shares on the exercise of
options of C$3.5 million, offset by the repurchase of our
common shares of C$0.7 million during the year pursuant to
our normal course issuer bid and the C$5.1 million change
in our cumulative translation account arising on the translation
of our U.S.-based foreign subsidiaries. The C$5.1 million
change is due to the continued strengthening of the Canadian
dollar from C$0.77 to C$0.83 in relation to
the U.S. dollar during the year. Our shareholders equity
increased C$9.1 million to C$160.5 million at the end
of 2004 from C$151.4 million at the end of 2003. This
increase resulted from net income of C$25.1 million, the
recognition of the fair value of share-based compensation of
C$0.6 million in 2003, and the issue of shares on the
exercise of options of C$0.6 million, offset by the
repurchase of our common shares of C$1.4 million during the
year and the C$15.8 million change in our cumulative
translation account arising on the translation of our U.S.-based
foreign subsidiaries in 2003. The C$15.8 million change is
due to the significant strengthening of the Canadian
dollar from C$0.63 to C$0.77 in relation
to the U.S. dollar during the year.
Our normal course issuer bid was renewed in 2004 and allows us
to repurchase up to 554,388 shares on the Toronto Stock
Exchange. We continue to believe that, from time to time, the
market price of our common shares does not fully reflect the
value of our business or future business prospects and that, at
such times,
47
outstanding common shares are an attractive, appropriate, and
desirable use of our available funds. In 2004 we purchased
29,300 common shares at an average price of C$24.57 per share
for an aggregate price of C$720,000. In 2003 we purchased 74,700
common shares at an average price of C$18.63 per share for an
aggregate price of C$1,392,000. In 2002 we purchased 54,600
common shares at an average price of C$16.12 per share for an
aggregate price of C$880,000.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes the contractual obligations due
on our long-term debt, other liabilities, and operating lease
commitments as of December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Less than | |
|
|
|
More than | |
|
|
Total | |
|
1 Year | |
|
2 - 3 Years | |
|
4 - 5 Years | |
|
5 Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands of Canadian dollars) | |
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
C$ |
33,975 |
|
|
C$ |
12,820 |
|
|
C$ |
19,585 |
|
|
C$ |
1,459 |
|
|
C$ |
111 |
|
Interest on debt(2)
|
|
|
2,824 |
|
|
|
1,479 |
|
|
|
1,269 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
19,868 |
|
|
|
3,050 |
|
|
|
6,079 |
|
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
|
7,339 |
|
Operating lease commitments
|
|
|
207,666 |
|
|
|
29,509 |
|
|
|
50,301 |
|
|
|
34,211 |
|
|
|
93,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
C$ |
264,333 |
|
|
C$ |
46,858 |
|
|
C$ |
77,234 |
|
|
C$ |
39,146 |
|
|
C$ |
101,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Does not include C$90,956,000 of debt expected to be incurred
under our credit facility in connection with the merger. |
|
(2) |
Based on an estimated average interest rate of 5.42% per year.
Does not include interest on C$90,956,000 of debt expected to be
incurred under our credit facility in connection with the merger
at an expected interest rate of approximately 4.1% per year. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2005, our only material off-balance sheet
financing arrangements relate to letters of credit in the amount
of C$1.7 million.
Market Risk
We are also exposed to various market factors that can affect
our performance primarily with respect to currency and interest
rate.
Currency. Because a significant portion of our revenue
and expenses is generated or incurred in U.S. dollars, we
face the challenge of dealing with fluctuations in exchange
rates. To the extent that U.S. dollar revenues are greater than
U.S. dollar expenses in a strengthening U.S. dollar environment,
we expect to see a positive impact on our income from
operations. Conversely, to the extent that U.S. dollar revenues
are greater than U.S. dollar expenses in a weakening U.S. dollar
environment, we expect to see a negative impact. This exchange
rate risk primarily reflects, on an annual basis, the impact of
fluctuating exchange rates on the net difference between total
U.S. dollar professional revenue and U.S. dollar expenses. Other
exchange rate risk arises from the revenue and expenses
generated or incurred by subsidiaries located outside of Canada
and the United States. Our income from operations will be
impacted by exchange rate fluctuations used in translating these
revenue and expenses. In addition, the impact of exchange rates
on the balance sheet accounts of subsidiaries located outside of
Canada and the United States will affect our operating results.
We also continue to be exposed to exchange rate risk for the
U.S. dollar and other foreign currency-denominated balance sheet
items carried by our Canadian, U.S. and international operations.
Interest Rate. Changes in interest rates present a risk
to our performance. All of our bank facilities, which are
comprised of operating loans and an acquisition loan, carry a
floating rate of interest. We estimate that, based on our
balances at December 31, 2004, a 1% change in interest
rates would impact our earnings
48
per share by less than C$0.01. In addition, we are subject to
interest rate risk to the extent that our investments held for
self-insured liabilities include fixed rate government and
corporate bonds.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The notes to our December 31, 2004 consolidated financial
statements outline our significant accounting estimates. The
accounting estimates discussed below are considered particularly
important since they require the most difficult, subjective, or
complex management judgments. Because of the uncertainties
inherent in making assumptions and estimates regarding unknown
future outcomes, future events may result in significant
differences between estimates and actual results. We believe
that each of our assumptions and estimates is appropriate to the
circumstances and represents the most likely future outcome.
Revenue Recognition and Cost Estimates on Contracts.
Revenue from fixed fee and variable fee with ceiling
contracts is recognized using the percentage of completion
method based on the ratio of contract costs incurred to total
estimated contract costs. We believe that costs incurred are the
best available measure of progress toward completion of these
contracts. Estimating total direct contract costs is subjective
and requires the use of our best judgments based upon the
information we have available at that point in time. Our
estimate of total direct contract costs has a direct impact on
the revenue we recognize. If our current estimates of total
direct contract costs turn out to be higher or lower than our
previous estimates, we would have over- or under-recognized
revenue for the previous period. We also provide for estimated
losses on incomplete contracts in the period in which such
losses are determined. Changes in our estimates are reflected in
the period in which such changes are made.
Goodwill. Goodwill is assessed for impairment at least
annually. This assessment includes a comparison of the carrying
value of the reporting unit to the estimated fair value to
ensure that the fair value is greater than the carrying value.
We arrive at the estimated fair value of a reporting unit using
valuation methods such as discounted cash flow analysis. These
valuation methods employ a variety of assumptions, including
revenue growth rates, expected operating income, discount rates,
and earnings multiples. Estimating the fair value of a reporting
unit is a subjective process and requires the use of our best
estimates. If our estimates or assumptions change from those
used in our current valuation, we may be required to recognize
an impairment loss in future periods.
Provision for Doubtful Accounts. We use estimates in
determining our allowance for doubtful accounts related to trade
receivables. These estimates are based on our best assessment of
the collectibility of the related receivable balance based, in
part, on the age of the specific receivable balance. A provision
is established when the likelihood of collecting the account has
significantly diminished (less than 50% chance of collection) or
when the account has been outstanding for a period of time
exceeding four months from the invoice date. Future collections
of receivables that differ from our current estimates will
affect the results of our operations in future periods.
Self-insured Liabilities. We self-insure certain risks
related to professional liability. The accrual for self-insured
liabilities includes estimates of the costs of reported claims
and is based on estimates of loss using assumptions made by
management, including consideration of actuarial projections.
These estimates of loss are derived from loss history that are
then subjected to actuarial techniques in the determination of
the proposed liability. Estimates of loss may vary from those
used by the actuarial projections and may result in a larger
loss than estimated. Any increase in loss would be recognized in
the period the loss is determined.
Outlook
The infrastructure and facilities market within North American
is diverse and varies significantly from region to region. The
market is made up of many technical disciplines, clients, and
industries, and engages both the private and public sectors.
Over the next few years, we expect the demand for services in
this market to be driven by continued population growth,
compliance with new government regulations and the need to
maintain and replace an aging North American infrastructure. The
market should also benefit from continued outsourcing of
technical services, especially in the public sector. The state
of the infrastructure and facilities
49
market is also tied to general economic performance. The overall
market outlook offers increasing prospects for accelerating
growth, particularly in the non-residential sectors.
Much of the actual growth seen in 2004 and over the past several
years has been driven by residential construction. However,
spending on public construction appears to be rising, while
private non-residential construction continues to rebound from
an extended downturn. Commercial and industrial participants
should increase capital spending as their earnings prospects
improve. In addition, a variety of public agencies have begun
planning for increased investment in infrastructure projects
after several years of below-trend spending. As predicted by
many forecasters, the residential construction market could
flatten this year both in Canada and the United States. However,
we anticipate that 2005 will continue to be a high-performance
year for housing, contributing to ongoing strong performance in
our urban land practice area. As well, we expect strength in
commercial construction markets, particularly industrial
projects, to support higher project activity.
Although much attention has been focused on delays in U.S.
government funding for programs such as the Transportation
Equity Act for the 21st Century, a recovery in state tax revenue
as incomes improve is likely to be a more significant factor in
driving spending on transportation, environmental, and other
capital projects in the United States. The Canadian market
should also benefit from the promised transfer of federal
funding to the provinces for health care and to municipalities
for new infrastructure and the rehabilitation of existing
facilities.
Within this overall market outlook, we expect to continue to
grow through a combination of internal hiring and acquisitions.
We target to achieve long-term average annual compound growth
rates of 15 to 20%, although we may not see growth in this range
every year. We have chosen this target because we believe that
it is an attainable goal that allows us to enhance the depth of
our expertise, broaden our service provision, provide expanded
opportunities for our employees, and lever our information
technology systems. Our ability to continue to grow at this rate
depends to a large extent on the availability of acquisition
opportunities. Since our industry is made up of 100,000, mostly
small firms, there are many acquisition candidates. At any one
time, we are engaged in discussions with up to 20 or more firms
ranging from very small firms to firms that are larger than
Keith.
We plan to support our targeted level of growth using a
combination of cash flow from operations and additional
financing while maintaining a return on our equity at or above
14% and a net income at or above 5% of net revenue. Although we
believe that a normal debt to equity ratio at or below 0.5 to 1
is an appropriate target for our Company, opportunities to
conclude transactions may make it necessary for us to increase
the amount of debt we carry beyond that limit. If the need to
finance a larger acquisition arises, we may seek to raise cash
by issuing additional shares.
Looking at the results of our current mix of project activity in
the United States and Canada, we anticipate that our gross
margin as a percentage of net revenue will remain in the range
of 53 to 55% for 2005 and that our administrative expenses will
remain in the range of 40 to 42% of net revenue. In addition, we
expect our effective tax rate for 2005 to be between 33 and 35%.
50
Description of Stantecs Business
General
We provide professional consulting services in planning,
engineering, architecture, interior design, landscape
architecture, surveying, environmental sciences project
management and project economics for infrastructure and
facilities projects. Our goal is to become a top 10 global
design and consulting services firm with C$1 billion in
annual revenue by the year 2008. To achieve this objective, we
will continue to deliver fee-for-service professional services
in the US$50 billion infrastructure and facilities market
through our focused, sustainable business model. For the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004, we had gross revenue of
approximately C$520.9 million and net income of
approximately C$30.2 million.
Our three-dimensional model which is based on
diversifying our operations in distinct geographic regions,
specializing in distinct but complementary practice areas, and
providing services in all five phases of the infrastructure and
facilities project life cycle allows us to manage
risk while continuing to increase our revenue and earnings.
Geographic Diversification. We currently have operations
in five economic regions in Canada and the United States as well
as a project presence in the Caribbean and other selected
international locations. Our strategy for geographic
diversification has two components. The first component is to
grow our existing regional operations by expanding our services
particularly in areas where we have not yet reached a mature
market presence. We target to achieve a market penetration of
C$10 million in revenue per one million population in these
regions. The second component includes expansion outside our
existing regions principally in the United States and Canada. We
expect to continue to expand geographically primarily by
acquiring firms that meet our integration criteria and to a
lesser extent by growing organically.
Practice Area Specialization. Specialization and
diversification of services are achieved by providing services
in 17 distinct practice areas that can generally be grouped
into five key practice areas buildings, environment,
industrial, transportation, and urban land. Focusing on this
combination of project services helps differentiate us from our
competitors, allowing us to enhance our presence in new
geographic regions and markets and to establish and maintain
client relationships. Our strategy for strengthening this
dimension of our business model is to increase the depth of our
expertise in our current practice areas and to selectively add
complementary practice areas to our operations.
Life Cycle Solutions. We seek to provide professional
services in all five phases of the project life
cycle planning, design, construction, maintenance,
and decommissioning. This inclusive approach allows us to
deliver services during periods of strong new capital project
activity, such as design and construction, as well as periods of
lower new capital project expenditures, such as maintenance and
rehabilitation. Beginning with the planning and design stages,
we provide conceptual and detailed design services, conduct
feasibility studies, and prepare plans and specifications.
During the construction phase, we generally act as the
owners representative, providing project management,
surveying, and resident engineering services. We focus
principally on fee-for-service type work and generally do not
act as the contractor or take on construction risk. Following
project completion, during the maintenance stage, we provide
ongoing professional services for maintenance and rehabilitation
in areas such as facilities and infrastructure management,
facilities operations, and performance engineering. Finally, in
the decommissioning phase, we provide solutions and
recommendations for taking facilities out of active service.
Through our One Team. Infinite Solutions. approach
to our business, we are able to undertake infrastructure and
facilities projects of any size for both public and private
sector clients. Currently, the majority of assignments we pursue
are small to midsize projects with a capital value of less than
C$100 million and potential project fees for Stantec of
less than C$10 million. These types of projects represent
the largest share of the infrastructure and facilities market.
Focusing on this project mix continues to ensure that we do not
rely on a few large, single projects for our revenue and that no
single client or project accounts for more than 5% of our
overall business.
We provide services to clients in both the public and private
sectors mainly in North America through integrated and
discipline-specific consulting and project delivery. Our
organizational structure gives us both
51
the strength and diversity of a large organization and a strong
regional presence to deliver our services locally. Our
Consulting Services business unit focuses on providing total
infrastructure solutions targeted to five practice
areas buildings, environment, industrial,
transportation and urban land.
We were incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act
on March 23, 1984 as 131277 Canada Ltd. Our Articles of
Incorporation were amended on several occasions, namely to
change our name, amend share attributes, create and delete
classes of shares, reorganize our outstanding share capital and
split our common shares, and change the minimum and maximum
number of directors. On August 15, 1984 the name 131277
Canada Ltd. was changed to Stanley Engineering Group Inc. and on
October 18, 1989, it was changed to Stanley Technology
Group Inc. On March 30, 1994, Stanley Technology Group Inc.
amalgamated with 3013901 Canada Limited to continue as Stanley
Technology Group Inc. On October 28, 1998, the name Stanley
Technology Group Inc. was changed to Stantec Inc.
Our corporate headquarters are located at 10160 112
Street, Edmonton, Alberta, T5K 2L6.
Business Units
Consulting Services is our principal focus and we currently
operate in five geographic regions: Canada West, Canada Central,
the US Southwest, the US Southeast and the US Northeast.
Affiliated companies, which accounted for less than 1% of our
revenue, fall within the responsibilities of the regional
management or within the corporate administration group. We
balance our geographic structure and management by also aligning
services and management in five practice areas
buildings, environment, industrial, transportation and urban
land.
In 2003, we realigned our organizational units to better
reflect its balanced regional focus and practice area
specialization. The two largest and most mature regional
operating units Canada West and Canada Central, were
further divided into smaller sub-regions. At present, our
regions in Canada include British Columbia, Alberta South,
Alberta North, Saskatchewan/ Manitoba, Ontario Southwest,
Ontario GTA (Greater Toronto Area), and Ontario East. Our three
US regions are US Southwest, US Southeast and US Northeast.
The five practice areas consist of 17 distinct specialist
practice areas including:
|
|
|
1. architecture & interior design; |
|
|
2. buildings engineering; |
|
|
3. facilities planning & operations; |
|
|
4. program & project management; |
|
|
5. strategic management; |
|
|
6. environmental infrastructure; |
|
|
7. environmental management; |
|
|
8. bio/pharmaceuticals; |
|
|
9. manufacturing/ industrial; |
|
|
10. power resources & chemicals; |
|
|
11. infrastructure management & pavement engineering; |
|
|
12. transportation infrastructure; |
|
|
13. transportation planning & traffic engineering; |
|
|
14. planning & landscape architecture; |
|
|
15. urban land engineering; |
|
|
16. surveys; and |
|
|
17. quality control/assurance. |
52
Consulting Services
We provide consulting services in five provinces in Canada, 15
states in the United States and selected international markets.
International projects generally have been in the water supply,
wastewater treatment, environmental protection, transportation
and health care sectors, often in countries with developing
economies.
Our staff and system capabilities allow us to undertake
infrastructure and facilities projects of any size. Currently,
most of our projects have total capital costs of less than
C$100 million and our potential fees from these types of
projects are generally in the range of 10% of the capital costs,
assuming we provide most of the services required. Joint
ventures, associations or subcontract arrangements are often
established to deal with larger projects. As a result, we
mitigate our overall risk by working on several thousand
projects each year, none of which would normally exceed 5% of
our revenue.
As mentioned above, our core capabilities in the consulting
services area are provided through 17 specialist practice
areas, most of which can generally be grouped into five practice
areas: buildings, environment, industrial, transportation and
urban land. Some specialist practice areas such as project and
program management, and strategic management services are
offered in all five practice areas.
Buildings Practice Area. We provide comprehensive
solutions for commercial, industrial and institutional
facilities. Typical projects include hospitals, educational and
recreational facilities, research and technology facilities,
office buildings and commercial centers. Services are delivered
through three specialist practice areas: architecture and
interior design, buildings engineering and facilities planning
and operations, and include project/ program management,
facilities management, strategic planning, architectural design,
interior design, and structural, mechanical and electrical
engineering. Our services are provided both in connection with
new construction and for existing buildings and facilities. For
existing buildings and facilities, we provide expertise in
building operating systems, performance engineering and ongoing
tenant improvements. We also provide services designed to
maximize the efficiency of a buildings existing systems
and improve its operations, including analyzing a
buildings exterior envelope and evaluating air quality,
lighting and energy efficiency. The demand for these specialized
types of services for existing buildings and facilities tends to
be counter-cyclical and improves our ability to generate fees
during periods of economic downturn and reduced capital spending.
Our clients in the buildings practice area include institutional
and commercial building owners and large multinational firms, as
well as government agencies that build, administer and operate
public buildings. Our clients also include independent
authorities or agencies, such as airport authorities,
transportation commissions and transit systems.
Environment Practice Area. We apply our specialized
knowledge and experience to develop and manage sustainable
solutions for air, water and soil. Our services are focused in
two specialist practice areas: environmental infrastructure and
environmental management. The core services we provide in these
two specialist practice areas include:
|
|
|
|
|
assimilative capacity |
|
|
|
wastewater collection systems |
|
|
|
municipal & industrial wastewater treatment |
|
|
|
infiltration & inflow/ CSO |
|
|
|
odor and corrosion control |
|
|
|
wastewater pumping |
|
|
|
water treatment |
|
|
|
water storage |
|
|
|
distribution systems |
|
|
|
water reclamation & reuse |
53
|
|
|
|
|
environmental site management |
|
|
|
environmental assessment |
|
|
|
water resources management |
|
|
|
heritage and natural resource assessment |
|
|
|
waste management |
|
|
|
risk assessment |
|
|
|
health and safety |
|
|
|
air quality assessment |
|
|
|
ecotoxicology and GLP testing |
|
|
|
microbiology laboratory |
We also have specialized expertise in advanced processes for
water and wastewater solutions, including biological/ enhanced
nutrient removal (BNR/ENR), microbiological assessment of
activated sludge and advanced water treatment. Our environment
services provide multidisciplinary teams of qualified and
experienced engineers, scientists, process specialists,
occupational hygienists, and specialists in environmental
regulation and policy.
Industrial Practice Area. Our comprehensive industrial
services are provided in three specialist practice areas:
bio/pharmaceutical, manufacturing/industrial, and power,
resources and chemicals. Services are provided to clients
principally in the private sector in the automotive, chemical,
consumer products, forestry, food and beverage,
bio/pharmaceutical, power generation, pulp and paper, utilities,
mining and general manufacturing sectors. Our services to these
clients include planning, engineering and project management. We
also provide specialty services including occupational health
and safety (industrial hygiene and prestart operator safety
reviews), system integration, instrumentation and control,
electrical energy and power management, facility planning and
design, industrial engineering, logistics, material handling and
commissioning. Projects range from the design of pilot versions
of new processes to the design, process verification, equipment
and materials procurement and project management for the
construction of entire industrial plants. Our bio/pharmaceutical
group provides solutions to companies involved in the discovery,
research and development, and manufacturing of a wide range of
pharmaceutical and biotechnology products.
Transportation Practice Area. We offer coordinated
solutions for the safe and efficient movement of people,
vehicles, aircraft and goods. Our core services include project
management, planning and engineering, which we provide through
three specialist practice areas: transportation planning and
traffic engineering, transportation infrastructure and
infrastructure management and pavement engineering. Our services
include: transportation master plans for communities and
airports; transportation investment studies; design of new and
upgraded airport facilities, such as terminals, runways and
taxiways; transit facilities, such as bus and light rail transit
systems; new and upgraded bridges; urban roadways; freeways;
interchanges; rural highways; and rail systems. Our specialty
services include simulation modeling, a comprehensive
understanding of transportation demand and supply management
principles, extensive use of a range of life cycle cost and
statistical analysis techniques and public consultation and
environmental assessment skills in developing practical,
cost-effective, long-term infrastructure facility plans with
broad public support.
A key feature of our transportation services is our expertise in
integrated infrastructure/asset management systems and
decision-support tools. Our infrastructure management and
pavement engineering specialist practice area includes
transportation and bridge engineers, roadway and bridge
inspection specialists, infrastructure management specialists,
geographic information system (GIS) specialists and
software specialists. This team designs, develops and implements
integrated infrastructure/asset management systems and work
management applications for pavement, bridges, right-of-way
features, water, wastewater, storm water, utilities and other
assets. These systems allow governments to prioritize and to
optimize the use of available funds through efficient and
cost-effective planning for public works maintenance,
rehabilitation and capital projects.
54
Our clients in this practice area are primarily public sector
agencies, transportation authorities and commercial and
institutional clients.
Urban Land Practice Area. Services in this practice area
include planning, engineering, surveying, project management and
landscape architecture services. These services are provided
principally to the land development and real estate industries.
Services are delivered through four specialist practice areas:
planning and landscape architecture, urban land engineering,
surveys and quality control/assurance. We assist our urban land
clients through the entire land development process providing
services from the initial master plan development to project
management of the construction of the infrastructure. Services
include or relate to conceptual plans, zoning approval of design
infrastructure, transportation planning, traffic engineering,
landscape architecture, urban planning, design construction
review and surveying.
Acquisitions
We compete in the professional consulting service industry. This
industry, which includes the engineering, architecture and
environmental sciences consulting industries, is highly
fragmented. We believe that industry trends continue to create
acquisition opportunities. Our goal is to continue to increase
our size and profitability. This goal will be accomplished
partly through the acquisition of established professional
consulting firms in Canada, the United States and
internationally. Our principal acquisition focus is in selected
regions in the United States and Canada. The following list
summarizes our acquisitions since the beginning of 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Business Acquired |
|
Services Provided |
|
Location |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
The Sear-Brown Group, Inc. |
|
engineering, planning, and architectural |
|
New York, Ohio, |
|
|
|
|
services |
|
Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Puerto Rico |
2004
|
|
GBR Architects Limited |
|
architectural design services |
|
Manitoba |
2004
|
|
Dunlop Architects Inc. |
|
architectural design services |
|
Ontario |
2004
|
|
Shaflik Engineering Ltd. |
|
electrical engineering services |
|
British Columbia |
|
|
|
|
specializing in traffic and sport facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
lighting |
|
|
2003
|
|
Ecological Services Group |
|
environmental management services |
|
Ontario |
|
|
Inc. |
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
APAI Architecture Inc. |
|
architectural design services |
|
British Columbia |
2003
|
|
Optimum Energy |
|
engineering management consulting |
|
Alberta |
|
|
Management Inc. |
|
services |
|
|
2003
|
|
Inner Dimension Design |
|
interior design services |
|
Saskatchewan |
|
|
Associates Inc. |
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
McCartan Consulting Ltd. |
|
mechanical engineering services |
|
Saskatchewan |
2002
|
|
Webster & Simmonds |
|
surveying services |
|
Ontario |
|
|
Surveying Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Cosburn Patterson Mather |
|
engineering and planning services |
|
Ontario |
|
|
Limited |
|
specializing in the land development and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
real estate industry |
|
|
2002
|
|
GKO Design Consultants |
|
consulting services specializing in |
|
Alberta |
|
|
Inc. |
|
energy, resources, chemicals and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
pharmaceuticals |
|
|
2002
|
|
M.R.S.F.M. Holdings Ltd. |
|
civil and structural engineering |
|
British Columbia |
|
|
(Graeme & Murray |
|
consulting services |
|
|
|
|
Consultants Ltd.) |
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
GeoViro Engineering Ltd. |
|
environmental consulting services |
|
British Columbia |
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Business Acquired |
|
Services Provided |
|
Location |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Site Consultants, Inc. |
|
civil and environmental engineering, |
|
North Carolina |
|
|
|
|
land use planning and surveying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
services |
|
|
2002
|
|
English Harper Reta |
|
architectural design services |
|
California |
|
|
Architects |
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
The RPA Group Limited |
|
project management services |
|
Ontario, Alberta |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and British |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Columbia |
2002
|
|
Beak International |
|
specialist environmental consulting |
|
Ontario |
|
|
Incorporated |
|
services |
|
|
We expect that the number of acquisitions we complete will
fluctuate from time to time because of the availability of
suitable firms on terms acceptable to us. In addition, at any
given time we may be focusing our efforts on integrating
previously acquired firms, which will reduce our acquisition
activity.
Generally, we seek to acquire firms with 50 or more employees
which will complement one of our existing practice areas or
regions or which add a new practice area or regional presence.
We consider smaller acquisitions in markets in which we have
existing operations.
We have experienced internal growth when existing clients of
newly acquired firms are offered the additional services that we
provide. Similarly, acquired firms services are
cross-marketed to our existing clients. We achieve moderate cost
savings through the sharing of administrative overhead, such as
payroll services, the sharing of office facilities, if possible,
and the provision of group insurance and centralized financing
which can generally be provided at lower rates than smaller
firms can obtain.
Foreign Operations
We conduct a portion of our business outside of North America.
Specifically, foreign operations included projects undertaken in
the Caribbean (primarily in Barbados but also in Trinidad,
Tobago, Antigua, Belize and Puerto Rico), in Asia (China, India
and Korea), in South America (Peru, Brazil, Bolivia and
Columbia) and in other locations (Cyprus, UAE, Madagascar, Kenya
and Pakistan). Such operations accounted for 1% of our revenue
in 2004. Some of this work involves political risk, contracts
with foreign clients and working under foreign legal systems.
Risk Management
We mitigate our operating risks through our business strategy
and other protective measures. As mentioned previously, our
three-dimensional business model of geographic, practice area
and project life cycle diversification minimizes our dependency
on any particular geographic area, industry or economic sector
for our income. We also mitigate risk by entering into a diverse
range of contracts with a wide range of fee amounts.
To address the risk of competition for qualified personnel and
to maintain our ability to attract and retain staff, we offer a
number of employment incentives, including training programs,
employee share ownership (for Canadian employees) and
opportunities for professional development and enhancement,
along with compensation plans which we believe to be innovative,
flexible and designed to reward top performance.
We maintain insurance coverage for our operations, including
policies covering general liability, automobile liability,
environmental liability, workers compensation and
employers liability, directors and officers
liability and professional liability insurance. The maximum
coverage under our professional liability policy is generally
C$35 million per claim and per annum, with a per claim
deductible of C$500,000 and an aggregate excess deductible of
C$2.5 million. In September 2003, we established a
regulated captive insurance company to insure and fund the
payment of any professional liability self-insured retentions
related to claims arising after August 1, 2003. We, or our
clients, also obtain project-specific insurance for designated
projects from time-to-time. In addition, we invest resources in
a risk management team dedicated
56
to providing company-wide support and guidance on risk avoidance
and professional practices and procedures. One such practice is
to carry out select client evaluations, including credit risk
appraisals, before entering into contract agreements in order to
reduce the risk of non-payment for our services.
We have a comprehensive project manager training program aimed
at skill development in risk mitigation, project planning,
quality control and assurance, and financial administration,
among other project management responsibilities. We believe that
improved project management across our operations will increase
our ability to deliver projects on schedule and within budget.
As well, we believe our experience and knowledge in conducting
business outside North America help us mitigate the risks of
undertaking international projects. This work involves political
uncertainties, contracts with foreign clients and operating
under foreign legal systems.
Competition
We operate in highly competitive markets and have numerous
competitors for all of the services we offer. The number and
identity of competitors varies widely with the type of service
we provide. Moreover, for small to medium sized projects, we
compete with many engineering, architectural and other
professional consulting firms. With larger projects, there are
fewer but still many competitors, however some of these
competitors have greater financial and other resources than we
do. While we compete with other large private and public
companies in certain geographic locations, our primary
competitors are smaller privately held regional firms in the
United States and Canada.
We believe that our operating structure, our enterprise systems
and the breadth of our professional services differentiate us
from other engineering, architecture and professional consulting
firms. Furthermore, our focus on small to midsize projects
distinguishes us from some larger competitors.
The principal competitive factors in the services we offer are:
reputation; experience; breadth and quality of services;
technical proficiency; local offices; competitive total project
fees; and service delivery. Given the expanding demand for the
services we provide, it is likely that additional competitors
will emerge. Notwithstanding this increased competition, we
believe that we will retain the ability to compete effectively
with our competition because of our strengths and expertise in
engineering, architecture and related professional services.
We serve many diverse clients in both the private and public
sectors. We seek to establish ongoing relationships with clients
that are likely to produce repeat business. We are not dependent
on any one client or group of clients for our business. No
single client represents more than 5% of our total revenue.
We offer a range of pricing structures to our clients but
primarily offer our services based on either a fixed or variable
fee contract with a ceiling or a time-and-material contract
without a stated ceiling. We secure our assignments primarily
based on our expertise and contacts, and sometimes on a
competitive bidding process.
Backlog
Our gross revenue backlog for fixed fee and variable fee with
ceiling contracts as of December 31, 2004 was approximately
C$380 million compared to C$310 million at
December 31, 2003. Our backlog represents an estimate of
the remaining future gross revenue from existing contracts. We
do not believe that backlog is fully indicative of the amount of
potential future revenue that we may achieve due to the
short-term nature of the contracts under which we generally
provide our services.
Research and Development
We generally conduct research and development in the context of
our clients specific project requirements. Most research
and development is conducted in the areas of infrastructure
evaluation and management systems, hydraulic modeling of water
and wastewater systems, pavement evaluation and management
systems and wastewater treatment.
57
Intellectual Property
We rely primarily upon trade secret laws to protect our
proprietary rights in our specialized technologies. There can be
no assurance that the protection provided to our proprietary
technology by the laws of foreign jurisdictions would be
substantially similar to the remedies available to us under the
laws of Canada and the United States.
Organizational Structure
The following chart lists, as of May 6, 2005, our
subsidiaries, their jurisdiction of incorporation and the
percentage of voting securities held by us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of | |
|
Jurisdiction of |
Subsidiary |
|
Voting Shares | |
|
Incorporation |
|
|
| |
|
|
659243 B.C. Ltd.
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
British Columbia |
0714993 B.C. Ltd.
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
British Columbia |
0715004 B.C. Ltd.
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
British Columbia |
0715007 B.C. Ltd.
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
British Columbia |
3053837 Nova Scotia Company
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Nova Scotia |
APAI Architecture Inc.
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
British Columbia |
Architectura Inc.
|
|
|
0 |
(1) |
|
Alberta |
Dunlop Murphy Hilgers Architects Inc.
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Ontario |
GKO Power Engineering Ltd.
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Alberta |
International Insurance Group Inc.
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Barbados |
J. Muller International Stanley Joint Venture
Inc.
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
New Brunswick |
Pentacore ADA Consulting, LLC
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Nevada |
Planning & Stantec Limited
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Trinidad & Tobago |
Project Delivery Holdings LLC
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
New York |
SB K-12 Architecture and Engineering, P.C.
|
|
|
0 |
(1) |
|
New Jersey |
S.B. Long Island Architecture, Engineering and Land Surveying,
P.C.
|
|
|
0 |
(1) |
|
New York |
SEA, Incorporated
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Nevada |
Spink Corporation, The
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
California |
SSBV Consultants Inc.
|
|
|
33.33 |
|
|
British Columbia |
Stantec Architecture Inc.
|
|
|
0 |
(1) |
|
North Carolina |
Stantec Architecture Ltd.
|
|
|
0 |
(1) |
|
Canada |
Stantec Consulting Associates P.C.
|
|
|
0 |
(1) |
|
New York |
Stantec Consulting California Inc.
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
California |
Stantec Consulting Caribbean Ltd.
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Barbados |
Stantec Consulting Inc.
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Arizona |
Stantec Consulting International Ltd.
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Canada |
Stantec Consulting Ltd.
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Canada |
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
New York |
Stantec Engineering (Puerto Rico) P.S.C.
|
|
|
0 |
(1) |
|
Puerto Rico |
Stantec Facilities Ltd.
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Alberta |
Stantec Geomatics Ltd.
|
|
|
50 |
(1) |
|
Alberta |
Stantec Holdings (Delaware) II Inc.
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Delaware |
Stantec Holdings Ltd.
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Alberta |
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of | |
|
Jurisdiction of |
Subsidiary |
|
Voting Shares | |
|
Incorporation |
|
|
| |
|
|
Stantec International Enterprises Limited
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Bahamas |
Stantec International Limited
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Barbados |
Stantec Technology International Inc.
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Delaware |
Teshmont Consultants Inc.
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Canada |
|
|
(1) |
We have entered into an agreement with respect to 100% of the
voting shares of this subsidiary that allows us to direct
control over any disposition of the voting shares of this
subsidiary. |
Employees
As of December 31, 2004, we had approximately
4,350 staff. This total staff number is comprised of
2,150 professionals, 1,550 technologists and
technicians and 650 support personnel.
We are a knowledge-based organization and are always seeking
talented and skilled professionals in all of our specialist
practice areas. Since the supply of qualified candidates at
times is limited, we use various recruitment strategies to
address those needs. Examples of our recruitment strategies
include an employee referral bonus program, website job
postings, career fairs, student programs and the ability to
offer geographic mobility.
Properties
Our corporate headquarters is located in Edmonton, Alberta,
where we lease approximately 188,550 square feet of space.
The lease on our corporate headquarters expires in 2019. In
addition, we lease office space in locations in which we operate
on commercially available terms. As of December 31, 2004,
we had approximately 50 leased premises in locations
throughout North America in addition to our corporate
headquarters. The lease terms range from a minimum of one year
to a maximum of 15 years with options, depending on the
particular lease, for renewal, expansions, contraction and
termination, sublease rights and allowances for improvements. We
believe that our current facilities are sufficient for the
operation of our business and that suitable additional space in
various local markets is available to accommodate any needs that
may arise and that suitable additional or substitute space will
be available as needed to accommodate any expansion of
operations. Lease payments for all of our leased premises
totaled approximately C$23.1 million in 2004.
Legal Proceedings
We are from time to time involved in litigation incidental to
the conduct of our business. As of June 30, 2005, we were
named as a defendant in the following action:
Sear-Brown, a company we acquired in April 2004, has been named
in a lawsuit related to design services it provided for a
roadway in New York State in connection with a multi-vehicle
accident that occurred on the roadway in November 2001. Valerie
Parris advanced a civil claim in New York State on or about
December 1, 2003 alleging, among other things, negligence
in the design and construction of the roadway. Ms. Parris
alleges that as a result of the accident, Alonzo Raynard Parris
sustained fatal injuries and his son, Raynard Parris, sustained
injury and mental distress. Sear-Brown is one of a number of
defendants in the legal proceeding. Damages sought total
US$43 million. Sear-Browns insurer has responded to
the claim. The allegations against Sear-Brown have been denied
and are being contested. An application for summary dismissal is
pending. There is a US$20,000,000 limit on the applicable
Sear-Brown professional liability insurance policy and a per
claim and aggregate deductible of $250,000, which aggregate
deductible has been satisfied. We have concluded that the
possibility of incurring a loss on this claim is remote. No
estimated loss has been recorded as none is expected.
In addition to the claim noted above, we have other claims and
suits pending, both by and against us. These are normal and
typical to the industries in which we operate. Where
appropriate, these claims have been reported to our and our
predecessors insurers who are in the process of adjusting
and/or defending them. None are expected to have a material
adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations
or liquidity.
59
Management of Stantec
The existing directors and officers of Stantec will remain as
directors and officers of Stantec following the merger, except
that Aram H. Keith, currently the Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Keith, will be appointed to the board of
directors of Stantec following the merger.
Executive Officers and Directors
The following table sets forth information about Stantecs
executive officers and directors, and their respective ages and
positions as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
Ronald Triffo
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board |
Anthony P. Franceschini
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Neilson A. Dutch Bertholf, Jr.
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
Director |
Robert J. Bradshaw
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Director |
E. John (Jack) Finn
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
Director |
William D. Grace
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
Director |
Susan E. Hartman
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
Director |
Robert R. Mesel
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
Director |
Donald W. Wilson
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
Jeffrey S. Lloyd
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
Vice President, Secretary & General Counsel |
Directors
Ronald Triffo has been associated with Stantec since
1977. He was appointed President in 1983, President and CEO in
1988 and Chairman of the Board in 1998. Mr. Triffo holds a
BSc. in Civil Engineering from the University of Manitoba and a
MSc. in Engineering from the University of Illinois. He is
currently a Director of TELUS Corporation and Chairman and
Director of ATB Financial. He is the private sector Co-Chair of
the Alberta Economic Development Authority and serves on the
board of the Alberta Ingenuity Fund, Albertas Promise, the
Advisory Council of the Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry at the
University of Alberta, and the board of governors of Junior
Achievement of Northern Alberta.
Anthony P. Franceschini has been with Stantec since 1978,
where he has provided consulting services, management, and
leadership, becoming Chief Executive Officer in 1998. He has
served as a director of Stantec since Stantec became publicly
traded in March 1994. He also serves as a director of Esterline
Technologies Corporation, a leading manufacturer in the
aerospace/ defence markets and is a director of privately held
CCI Thermal Technologies Inc., an Edmonton-based manufacturer of
industrial heating products and custom-engineered process
heating equipment.
Neilson A. Dutch Bertholf, Jr. has been
a member of Stantecs board of directors since 1998 and
serves on the Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee.
He is retired from a 40-year career in aviation.
Mr. Bertholf, Jr. is a lifetime board member of the
Arizona Sports Foundation Inc. (Fiesta Bowl) and is a member on
the executive committee and a vice president of the Grand Canyon
Council, Boy Scouts of America. He is also a member of the board
of directors for the Airline Training Center, Arizona, a
Division of Lufthansa Flight Training, Lufthansa Airlines,
Germany.
Robert J. Bradshaw has been a member of Stantecs
board of directors since 1993. He is a professional engineer
with a diverse background in the manufacturing, oil, consulting
engineering, and nuclear industries, as well as in power
generation and government service. Mr. Bradshaw is
currently Chairman of Contor Industries Limited, which acquires
mature manufacturing companies requiring significant turn-around
activities. The business of the Contor companies ranges from
nuclear and aerospace to hydro electric; gold mining; food
processing; aircraft leasing and waste disposal.
Mr. Bradshaw acts as Chairman for Zircatec Precision
Industries, Inc. and Bradcohill Inc., and is also a director of
Configuresoft, Inc.
60
E. John (Jack) Finn has been a member of
Stantecs board of directors since 1995. He is the retired
Chairman of Dorr-Oliver, Inc., a process engineering and
equipment firm. An electrical engineering graduate of Carnegie
Mellon University, Mr. Finns business experience has
focused on operations and general management. He held various
executive positions with The Carborundum Company, Kennecott
Corporation and The Standard Oil Company. In addition to
Stantec, he is currently a director of Vodium of Washington, DC
and Delicious Milk Company of New York, NY. He also is a Member
of the National Association of Corporate Directors.
William D. Grace has been a member of Stantecs
board of directors since 1994. Mr. Grace is a graduate of
the University of Alberta and a Fellow Chartered Accountant
(FCA). During his business career, he served as the chief
financial officer with several Alberta corporations including
Chieftain Development Co. Ltd., R. Angus (Alberta) Limited
and Canadian Utilities Limited. From 1988 to 1994, he was a
managing partner in the Edmonton office of Price Waterhouse.
Mr. Grace is the recipient of several awards including the
Alberta Achievement Award from the Province of Alberta, the
Lifetime Achievement Award from the Alberta Institute of
Chartered Accountants and the University of Alberta Alumni Award
of Excellence. He currently holds a number of corporate
directorships in addition to Stantec, including the Forzani
Group, Melcor Developments and several private companies. He is
also the independent Chairman of the Edmonton Pipe Industry
Pension Trust and Health & Welfare Funds, a director of
the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada, and a public
Council member of the Association of Professional Engineers,
Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta. Mr. Grace has been
active over the past twenty-five years in numerous community and
professional activities.
Susan E. Hartman has been a member of Stantecs
board of directors since 2004. Ms. Hartman holds a bachelor
of science degree in chemistry and has diverse experience in
strategic planning, business management, mergers and
acquisitions, operations, and international business
development. In 1993 she started her own management consulting
firm, The Hartman Group. Ms. Hartman continues as president
and owner of The Hartman Group, leading the companys
consulting services in the area of strategic and operational
planning, overall business assessment, process optimization, and
project management. She currently serves as a board member on
QED Technologies and the SCORE Foundation.
Robert R. Mesel has been a member of Stantecs board
of directors since 2004. Mr. Mesel is an experienced
business professional with expertise in business development,
administration, accounting, and finance. Prior to his retirement
in 1997, Mr. Mesel was a director and/or trustee for many
prestigious organizations, including the Financial Executive
Institute (Northeast Ohio Chapter), Ohio Council for Economic
Education, Greater Cleveland Salvation Army, and Canisius
College. Mr. Mesel completed his bachelor of business
administration in accounting at Canisius College, his masters of
business administration at State University of New York, and the
advanced management program at Harvard Business School. He is
also the past president of BP Chemicals Inc. and Chase
Brass & Copper Company.
All directors are re-elected annually.
Other Executive Officers
Donald W. Wilson is Stantecs Vice
President & Chief Financial Officer. As part of the
Executive Leadership Team, Mr. Wilson is in charge of the
Financial Services and Corporate Development groups. He is
responsible for financial services, investor relations,
financial reporting, and Stantecs finances.
Mr. Wilson joined Stantec in 1990 as the controller for
Stanley Associates Engineering Ltd. He was appointed Vice
President & Chief Financial Officer in 1994. In that same
year, he was instrumental in Stantecs initial public
offering, which resulted in Stantec being listed on the Toronto
Stock Exchange under the symbol STN. Mr. Wilson is also
actively involved with Stantecs acquisition program.
Mr. Wilson graduated from the University of Saskatchewan,
receiving a bachelor of commerce degree with distinction,
majoring in accounting. He attained his chartered accountant
designation in 1979. Mr. Wilsons outside commitments
include membership on the Alberta Provincial Audit Committee.
Past commitments have included serving as president of the
Edmonton chapter of Financial Executives International, a former
member of the Edmonton public school boards Business
Leaders for Public Education, a past chairman and member
of the board of
61
trustees of North West Regional College, a past director of the
North Battleford Housing Authority, and a past director of
Stantec.
Jeffrey S. Lloyd leads Stantecs Corporate
Development group. The Corporate Development group is
responsible for Stantecs acquisition program and legal
affairs. Mr. Lloyd has been involved in each acquisition
undertaken by Stantec since its initial public offering in 1994.
Mr. Lloyd is a lawyer by profession, beginning his legal
career with Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP in Toronto where
he practiced corporate law until 1994 with an emphasis on
mergers and acquisitions and corporate finance. In 1994,
Mr. Lloyd joined the Stantec organization as General
Counsel at which time he assumed responsibility for the legal
affairs of Stantec. In 1998, Mr. Lloyd was appointed a Vice
President of Stantec Inc. with responsibility for the Corporate
Development group, in addition to his responsibilities as
Corporate Secretary. Mr. Lloyd holds a bachelor of science
degree in business administration with a major in finance and
real estate from the University of Denver and a bachelor of laws
degree from Osgoode Hall Law School at York University.
Mr. Lloyd is a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada
and the Law Society of Alberta. In 1995, Mr. Lloyd
completed the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants
In Depth Tax Course, a two-year detailed income tax program.
Mr. Lloyd is a member of the Synergy Network of Edmonton.
Committees of the Board
There are two committees of the board: (1) the Audit
Committee and (2) the Corporate Governance and Compensation
Committee.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee is currently comprised of three members,
William D. Grace (Chairman), E. John Finn and Robert
R. Mesel. Stantecs board of directors has determined that
each member of the Audit Committee is independent
and financially literate as such terms are defined
under the rules and regulations of the SEC, the New York Stock
Exchange and Canadian securities laws. In addition, the board of
directors has determined that Mr. Grace is an Audit
Committee Financial Expert as such term is defined under
the rules and regulations of the SEC and the New York Stock
Exchange. The board believes that the composition of the Audit
Committee reflects an appropriate level of financial literacy
and expertise. During the financial year ended December 31,
2004, Stephen D. Lister (an independent director) was a member
of this committee until his retirement on November 4, 2004,
when Robert R. Mesel was appointed to fill that vacancy.
In summary, the Audit Committee monitors, evaluates, approves
and makes recommendations on matters affecting our external
audit, financial reporting and accounting control policies. The
Audit Committees mandate includes:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewing and recommending for approval to the board, the annual
audited financial statements and other continuous disclosure
documents, including: |
|
|
|
a) the financial content of the annual report, |
|
|
b) the annual management information circular and proxy
materials, |
|
|
c) the annual information form, and |
|
|
d) the management discussion and analysis section of the
annual report; |
|
|
|
|
|
reviewing and authorizing the release of the quarterly unaudited
financial statements including management discussion and
analysis, quarterly interim report to shareholders and quarterly
press release of our earnings; |
|
|
|
reviewing and recommending for approval to the board, all
financial statements, financial reports, and the financial
content of prospectuses, and any other reports requiring board
approval prior to being submitted to any regulatory authority; |
62
|
|
|
|
|
reviewing the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer certification of annual and interim disclosure; |
|
|
|
discussing with management our major financial risk exposures
and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such
exposures; |
|
|
|
reviewing with management on an annual basis, our obligations
pursuant to guarantees that have been issued and material
obligations that have been entered into, and the manner in which
these guarantees and obligations have been, or should be,
disclosed in the financial statements. |
|
|
|
reviewing and assessing, in conjunction with management and the
external auditor: |
|
|
|
a) the appropriateness of our accounting policies and
financial reporting practices, and considering any available
alternatives; |
|
|
b) any significant proposed changes in financial reporting
and accounting policies and practices to be adopted by us; |
|
|
c) any new or pending developments in accounting and
reporting standards that may affect or impact Stantec; and |
|
|
d) the key estimates and judgments of management that may
be material to our financial reporting; |
|
|
|
|
|
assessing the performance of the external auditor and
considering whether to recommend its annual appointment to the
board for ultimate recommendation to the shareholders; |
|
|
|
reviewing, approving and executing the annual engagement letter
with the external auditor; |
|
|
|
approving the engagement of the external auditor for all
non-audit services and the fees for such services, and
considering whether any non-audit service compromises the
independence of the external audit work; |
|
|
|
reviewing all fees paid to the external auditor for audit
services and, if appropriate, recommending the fees for board
approval; |
|
|
|
reviewing with the external auditor the results of the annual
audit examination; |
|
|
|
reviewing any litigation, claim or other contingency, including
tax assessments, that could have a material effect upon our
financial position or operating results; |
|
|
|
reviewing annually, or as required, the appropriateness of the
system of internal controls and approval policies and practices
concerning the expenses of our officers; |
|
|
|
reviewing and approving the expense accounts of our board chair
and the chief executive officer; |
|
|
|
reviewing the adequacy of our insurance program; |
|
|
|
reviewing and determining the disposition of any complaints
received under our Whistle Blower Policy Complaint
Resolution Process; and |
|
|
|
reviewing and determining the disposition of any complaints
received from our shareholders or any regulatory body. |
The Audit Committee met six times in 2004. In addition to formal
meetings, the members of the Audit Committee meet informally as
required, either in person or by telephone. The Chairman of the
Audit Committee provides regular reports at board meetings.
Corporate Governance and
Compensation Committee
The Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee is comprised
of four members: Robert J. Bradshaw (Chairman), Neilson A.
Bertholf, Jr., William D. Grace and Susan E. Hartman.
Stantecs board of directors has determined that each
member of the Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee is
independent and unrelated as such terms
are defined under the rules and regulations of the SEC, the
63
New York Stock Exchange and Canadian securities laws. During the
financial year ended December 31, 2004, Robert E. Flynn (an
independent director) was a member of this committee until his
retirement on November 4, 2004 when Susan E. Hartman was
appointed to the committee to fill that vacancy.
This committee makes recommendations to the board on:
Corporate Governance Matters
|
|
|
|
|
developments in the area of corporate governance generally; |
|
|
|
composition and size of the board; |
|
|
|
appropriate candidates for nomination to the board; |
|
|
|
providing an orientation and education program for new directors; |
|
|
|
evaluating the performance of the board, any committees, and
individual directors; |
|
|
|
considering and approving any requests by an individual director
to engage outside experts at our expense. |
Compensation Matters
|
|
|
|
|
compensation policies reflecting the rationale for each element
of executive pay, including the link between compensation and
performance and the level of competitiveness of the total
compensation package; |
|
|
|
administration of our Employee Share Option Plan; |
|
|
|
executive management compensation, including bonuses, stock
options, pensions and benefits; |
|
|
|
compensation for the Chief Executive Officer; |
|
|
|
senior management performance reviews; |
|
|
|
succession plans for executive management positions. |
The Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee met once in
2004. In addition to formal meetings, the members of the
committee meet informally as required, either in person or by
telephone. The Chairman of the Corporate Governance and
Compensation Committee provides regular reports at board
meetings.
Compensation of Directors
Mr. Triffo, the Chairman of the Board, receives C$150,000
per year as a director fee retainer pursuant to an agreement
with us. He is not paid any additional amounts for attending
board committee meetings, chairing board meetings, or attending
meetings or events in support of the company. This agreement
with Mr. Triffo will end when he ceases to be the Chairman
of the Board.
The President and CEO, Mr. Franceschini, is not compensated
for acting as a director.
The remaining six directors are paid according to our director
compensation program, which is intended to (1) encourage
the directors to hold a continuing equity interest in us;
(2) align the interests of directors with the interests of
shareholders; and (3) attract and retain qualified Canadian
and U.S. directors.
The director compensation program includes deferred share units
(DSUs), each of which has the same value as one of our common
shares; however, DSUs carry no voting rights and they cannot be
transferred. DSUs cannot be exercised until death or retirement
of a director, upon which, the value of a directors DSUs
are paid in cash. Each DSU will be valued at our common share
market price on the last trading day of the month of the death
or retirement of the director. DSUs are granted on the last day
of the previous quarter and once granted, the number of DSUs
will not be adjusted even if the director dies or retires in the
quarter to which a grant of DSUs relates. The number of DSUs
held by directors and the number of DSUs to which
64
directors are entitled will be appropriately adjusted for any
change in the number of our outstanding common shares that
occurs by reason of any stock split, consolidation, or other
corporate change.
The directors, other than Mr. Triffo and
Mr. Franceschini, receive:
|
|
|
|
|
1,600 DSUs a year (400 per quarter); |
|
|
|
An additional C$1,500 per quarter if they chair a board
committee; and |
|
|
|
C$1,800 for every board meeting or board committee meeting they
attend. |
During Stantecs financial year ending December 31,
2004, Stantec compensated its directors, other than
Mr. Franceschini, approximately C$522,440. This figure
includes the Chairmans compensation of C$150,000 and
compensation paid or issued to outside directors as follows:
|
|
|
Chairman compensation
|
|
C$150,000 |
Chair and meeting fees
|
|
C$114,600 |
DSUs (valued at date of issue)
|
|
C$257,840 |
Executive Compensation
Summary Compensation
Table
The following table summarizes the compensation of our Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the next three
most highly compensated executive officers for the years
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Securities under | |
|
All Other | |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
Salary | |
|
Bonus(1) | |
|
Options(2) | |
|
Compensation | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
A.P. Franceschini
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
C$ |
375,004 |
|
|
C$ |
844,350 |
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
C$ |
9,000(3 |
) |
|
President & CEO |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
C$ |
367,793 |
|
|
C$ |
717,338 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
C$ |
11,250(4 |
) |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
C$ |
250,000 |
|
|
C$ |
748,705 |
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
C$ |
6,500(3 |
) |
D.W. Wilson
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
C$ |
224,030 |
|
|
C$ |
250,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
C$ |
69,439(5 |
) |
|
Vice President & CFO |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
C$ |
196,165 |
|
|
C$ |
195,000 |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
C$ |
5,500(3 |
) |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
C$ |
183,787 |
|
|
C$ |
116,212 |
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
C$ |
5,176(3 |
) |
R.L. Alarie
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
C$ |
233,649 |
|
|
C$ |
350,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
C$ |
3,750(3 |
) |
|
Executive Vice-President |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
C$ |
196,165 |
|
|
C$ |
230,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
C$ |
5,500(3 |
) |
|
Stantec Consulting Ltd. |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
C$ |
175,013 |
|
|
C$ |
200,000 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
C$ |
200,631(6 |
) |
M.E. Jackson
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
C$ |
218,460 |
|
|
C$ |
250,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
C$ |
5,869(3 |
) |
|
Senior Vice President |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
C$ |
176,542 |
|
|
C$ |
205,000 |
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
C$ |
5,100(3 |
) |
|
Stantec Consulting Ltd. |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
C$ |
165,009 |
|
|
C$ |
135,000 |
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
C$ |
200,255(7 |
) |
W.B. Lester
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
C$ |
230,994 |
|
|
C$ |
350,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
C$ |
6,192(3 |
) |
|
Executive Vice President |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
C$ |
220,664 |
|
|
C$ |
350,000 |
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
C$ |
6,000(3 |
) |
|
Stantec Consulting Ltd. |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
C$ |
225,000 |
|
|
C$ |
325,000 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
C$ |
5,500(3 |
) |
|
|
(1) |
Represents bonuses earned and calculated in respect of the
indicated financial year. |
|
(2) |
Options to purchase our common shares. See below for further
information regarding option grants and exercises during the
most recently completed financial 2 year. |
|
(3) |
Represents a payment to the executive officers registered
retirement savings/employee share purchase plan. |
|
(4) |
Represents a payment to Mr. Franceschinis registered
retirement savings/employee share purchase plan (C$9,000) and a
service award (C$2,250) |
|
(5) |
Represents a payment to Mr. Wilsons registered
retirement savings/employee share purchase plan (C$5,980) and a
payout of vacation time that Mr. Wilson had accrued but not
taken during his time at Stantec (C$63,459). |
65
|
|
(6) |
Represents a payment to Mr. Alaries registered
retirement savings/employee share purchase plan (C$5,176) and a
performance payment arising in connection with the acquisition
of PEL Group Inc. by Stantec Consulting Ltd. in 1997 (C$195,455). |
|
(7) |
Represents a payment to Mr. Jacksons registered
retirement savings/employee share purchase plan (C$4,800) and a
performance payment arising in connection with the acquisition
of PEL Group Inc. by Stantec Consulting Ltd. in 1997 (C$195,455). |
Option Grants For Stantec Common Shares in Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total | |
|
|
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options | |
|
|
|
Underlying | |
|
|
|
|
Securities | |
|
Granted | |
|
|
|
Options on the | |
|
|
|
|
under | |
|
to Employees in | |
|
|
|
Date of Grant | |
|
Expiration | |
Name |
|
Options(1) | |
|
Financial Year | |
|
Price (C$/Common Share) | |
|
(C$/Security) | |
|
Date | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
A.P. Franceschini
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
0.00% |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
D.W. Wilson
|
|
|
5000 |
(2) |
|
|
2.99% |
|
|
C$ |
24.50 |
|
|
C$ |
24.50 |
|
|
|
December 14, 2011 |
|
R.L. Alarie
|
|
|
5000 |
(2) |
|
|
2.99% |
|
|
C$ |
24.50 |
|
|
C$ |
24.50 |
|
|
|
December 14, 2011 |
|
M.E. Jackson
|
|
|
5000 |
(2) |
|
|
2.99% |
|
|
C$ |
24.50 |
|
|
C$ |
24.50 |
|
|
|
December 14, 2011 |
|
W.B. Lester
|
|
|
5000 |
(2) |
|
|
2.99% |
|
|
C$ |
24.50 |
|
|
C$ |
24.50 |
|
|
|
December 14, 2011 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Options granted under our Employee Share Option Plan to purchase
our common shares. |
|
(2) |
1,667 options are exercisable on December 14, 2005, 1,667
options are exercisable on December 14, 2006, and 1,666
options are exercisable on December 14, 2007. |
Aggregated Option Exercises During the Most Recently
Completed Financial Year and
Financial Year-End Option Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Unexercised | |
|
|
|
|
Aggregate | |
|
Unexercised Options at | |
|
In-the-Money | |
|
|
Securities | |
|
Value | |
|
Financial Year End | |
|
Options at the Fiscal | |
|
|
Acquired on | |
|
Realized | |
|
(#) | |
|
Year End(1) | |
Name |
|
Exercise (#) | |
|
(C$) | |
|
Exercisable/ Unexercisable | |
|
Exercisable/ Unexercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
A.P. Franceschini
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
C$ |
4,214,000 |
|
|
|
112,000 / 90,000 |
|
|
C$ |
1,732,060 / C$210,300 |
|
D.W. Wilson
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
26,335 / 11,665 |
|
|
C$ |
493,258 / C$61,582 |
|
R.L. Alarie
|
|
|
4,700 |
|
|
C$ |
70,560 |
|
|
|
5,000 / 12,000 |
|
|
C$ |
46,900 / C$67,760 |
|
M.E. Jackson
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
8,001 / 12,999 |
|
|
C$ |
78,516 / C$71,064 |
|
W.B. Lester
|
|
|
39,000 |
|
|
C$ |
690,200 |
|
|
|
2,334 / 13,666 |
|
|
C$ |
12,790 / C$83,390 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The closing price of our common shares on the Toronto Stock
Exchange on December 31, 2004 was C$26.48. |
Employee Share Option Plan
Our Employee Share Option Plan provides for the granting of
options to purchase common shares to our directors, officers,
employees, and consultants. The board of directors believes that
issuing options to key individuals is an effective means of
aligning the interests of these individuals with the interests
of our shareholders.
At the time of the last amendment to the plan in March of 2002,
1,754,938 shares were reserved for issuance as options,
which, together with certain individual option agreements which
existed at the time, totaled 1,814,938 common shares,
representing 10% of our issued and outstanding common shares at
that time.
On February 24, 2005, the board of directors resolved to
reset the number of shares reserved for issuance as options.
Subject to shareholder approval, the Employee Share Option Plan
has been amended to
66
reserve 1,892,718 common shares, being 10% of the current
issued and outstanding common shares as of March 21, 2005.
We do not issue any securities other than common shares.
Terms of the Plan
Each option granted has a maximum term of 10 years and is
exercisable on terms determined by the board of directors,
including vesting and restrictions on sale or other disposition
of common shares acquired upon exercise of an option. The board
of directors establishes the exercise price for options when
issued, which in all cases cannot be less than (1) the
closing price of our common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange
on the trading day immediately preceding the date of the grant;
or (2) such lesser permissible amount under applicable
legislation or the rules and regulations of the Toronto Stock
Exchange.
Any common shares subject to an option, which is for whatever
reason cancelled or terminated without having been exercised,
are again available for grant under the plan.
The maximum number of common shares which may be reserved for
issuance to insiders under the plan is 10% of the common shares
outstanding at the time of the grant (on a non-diluted basis)
less the aggregate number of common shares reserved for issuance
to insiders under any other share compensation arrangement. In
addition, the maximum number of common shares which may be
issued to insiders under the plan within a one-year period is
10% of the common shares outstanding at the time of the issuance
(on a non-diluted basis), excluding common shares issued under
the plan or any other share compensation arrangement over the
preceding one year period. The maximum number of common shares
which may be issued to any one insider under the plan within a
one year period is 5% of the common shares outstanding at the
time of the issuance (on a non-diluted basis), excluding common
shares issued to the insider in question under the plan or any
other share compensation arrangement over the preceding one year
period; however, any entitlement to acquire common shares
granted pursuant to the plan or any other share compensation
arrangement prior to the optionholder becoming an insider shall
be excluded for the purposes of the limits set out above.
In addition, the maximum number of common shares which may be
reserved for issuance to any one person is 5% of the common
shares outstanding at the time of the grant (on a non-diluted
basis) less the aggregate number of common shares reserved for
issuance to such person under any other option to purchase
common shares from treasury granted as compensation or incentive
mechanism.
Should the number of issued and outstanding common shares change
due to a stock dividend, split, consolidation, or other
corporate change, the board would, with the approval of the
Toronto Stock Exchange, make an appropriate adjustment to the
terms of previously issued options.
If an optionholder ceases to be eligible for the plan for any
reason other than death, each option held by that person ceases
to be exercisable 30 days after that person becomes
ineligible and any option or portion of an option not vested by
the date of becoming ineligible cannot be exercised under any
circumstances. These provisions apply regardless of whether the
person is dismissed with or without cause.
Options are only assignable when an option holder dies and only
by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. Following
death of an option holder, his or her legal representative may
exercise the options within six months after the date of death,
but only to the extent that the options were by their terms
exercisable on the date of death.
The board of directors may amend, suspend or terminate the plan
or any portion thereof at any time in accordance with applicable
legislation and subject to any required approval. With the
consent of affected optionholders, the board of directors may
amend or modify any outstanding option in any manner to the
extent that the board would have the authority to initially
grant such award, including, without limitation, to change the
date or dates as of which an option becomes exercisable, subject
to the prior approval of the relevant stock exchange. The board
of directors also has the authority to adopt, amend and rescind
administrative guidelines and other rules and regulations
relating to the plan.
67
Shares Reserved and Options
Granted
The following table shows shares reserved and options granted,
exercised and available for grant:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options | |
|
|
Plan | |
|
Options | |
|
Options | |
|
Available for | |
|
|
Maximum | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Exercised | |
|
Future Grant | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance as of March 21, 2005 (prior to proposed change)
|
|
|
1,754,938 |
|
|
|
1,012,833 |
|
|
|
697,365 |
|
|
|
44,740 |
|
Percentage of common shares outstanding as of March 21,
2005 (prior to proposed change)
|
|
|
9.27 |
% |
|
|
5.35 |
% |
|
|
3.68 |
% |
|
|
0.24 |
% |
Balance as of March 21, 2005 (after proposed change, based
upon number of issued and outstanding common shares as of
March 21, 2005)
|
|
|
1,892,718 |
|
|
|
1,012,833 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
879,885 |
|
Percentage of common shares outstanding as of March 21,
2005 (after proposed change)
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
|
5.35 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
4.65 |
% |
Equity Compensation Plan Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities Remaining | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Future Issuance | |
|
|
Number of Securities to | |
|
Weighted-average Exercise | |
|
under Equity Compensation | |
|
|
be Issued upon Exercise of | |
|
Price of Outstanding | |
|
Plans (Excluding Securities | |
|
|
Outstanding Options | |
|
Options | |
|
Reflected in Column (a)) | |
Plan Category |
|
(a) | |
|
(b) | |
|
(c) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
1,033,833 |
|
|
C$ |
13.63 |
|
|
|
44,740(1 |
) |
|
|
(1) |
This number is equal to the maximum number of options to
purchase common shares authorized to be issued under the Stantec
Employee Share Option Plan (1,754,938) less 676,365 options
which have been exercised over the life of the Stantec Employee
Share Option Plan less the 1,033,833 options outstanding as
at January 31, 2005. |
Employment Agreements
Anthony P.
Franceschini.
We have an employment contract with Mr. Franceschini,
effective January 1, 2003, which provides that
Mr. Franceschini will remain Stantecs President and
CEO until December 31, 2008. The contract provides for
(1) an annual base salary of C$375,000, (2) an annual
bonus of 1.5% of our annual income before deductions for
employee performance bonuses, executive bonuses and taxes, and
(3) options to purchase our common shares as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Options |
|
Strike Price | |
|
Vesting Date | |
|
Expiry Date | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
30,000
|
|
C$ |
16.10 |
|
|
|
January 3, 2004 |
|
|
|
January 3, 2010 |
|
30,000
|
|
C$ |
18.85 |
|
|
|
January 3, 2005 |
|
|
|
January 3, 2011 |
|
30,000
|
|
C$ |
21.60 |
|
|
|
January 3, 2006 |
|
|
|
January 3, 2012 |
|
30,000
|
|
C$ |
24.35 |
|
|
|
January 3, 2007 |
|
|
|
January 3, 2013 |
|
30,000
|
|
C$ |
27.10 |
|
|
|
January 3, 2008 |
|
|
|
January 3, 2013 |
|
If Mr. Franceschini is terminated without cause, he will
receive a lump sum payment of C$750,000. Mr. Franceschini
will also receive a C$750,000 lump sum payment if he terminates
his employment within six-months of our undergoing a change in
control. A change in control, for this purpose, is defined as a
situation where a person acquires more than 50% of our common
shares. A change in control also occurs
68
when the nominees of a person holding at least 30% of our common
shares are elected as directors and comprise a majority of the
board.
In all other cases Mr. Franceschini may end his employment
after giving three months notice.
Mr. Franceschinis contract also restricts
Mr. Franceschini from competing with us, soliciting our
employees, and soliciting our clients for a period of two years
following termination of his employment.
Donald W. Wilson
Stantec Consulting Ltd. has an employment contract with Donald
W. Wilson effective October 31, 2001. The contract provides
Mr. Wilson with a bi-weekly salary and a discretionary
annual bonus. Mr. Wilsons bi-weekly salary was set at
C$8,913 effective January 1, 2005. The contract does not
have a fixed term and terminates upon certain events, including
death, permanent incapacity and Mr. Wilson reaching the age
of sixty-five. The contract may also be terminated by Stantec
Consulting Ltd. with cause, by either Stantec Consulting Ltd. or
Mr. Wilson without cause, or by Mr. Wilson upon a
change of control.
If Stantec Consulting Ltd. terminates Mr. Wilson without
cause, it must make a C$200,000 lump sum payment to him.
Mr. Wilson will also receive a C$200,000 lump sum payment
if he were to end his employment within six-months of us
undergoing a change in control. A change in control, for this
purpose, would occur where a person acquires more than 50% of
our common shares or where the nominees of a person holding at
least 30% of our common shares are elected as directors and
comprise a majority of the board of directors. In all other
cases, Mr. Wilson may end his employment after giving
Stantec Consulting Ltd. three months notice.
Mr. Wilsons agreement restricts Mr. Wilson from
competing with us, soliciting our employees, and soliciting our
clients for a period of two years following termination of his
employment.
Raymond L. Alarie
Stantec Consulting Ltd. also has an employment contract with
Mr. Alarie effective January 1, 2005. This contract
provides Mr. Alarie with a bi-weekly salary and a
discretionary annual bonus. Mr. Alaries bi-weekly
salary was set at C$9,308.25 effective January 1, 2005. The
contract does not have a fixed term and terminates upon certain
events, including death, permanent incapacity and
Mr. Alarie reaching the age of sixty-five. The contract may
also be terminated by Stantec Consulting Ltd. with cause, by
either Stantec Consulting Ltd. or Mr. Alarie without cause,
or by Mr. Alarie upon a change of control.
If Stantec Consulting Ltd. terminates Mr. Alaries
employment without cause, it must pay him his base salary earned
to the termination date, a termination bonus, and a one-year
compensation payment. The termination bonus that would be paid
to Mr. Alarie would be equal to the annual bonus earned by
Mr. Alarie in respect of the previous fiscal year,
pro-rated for that portion of the year, which elapses from the
end of the previous fiscal year to the date of termination. If
no bonus was paid to Mr. Alarie in respect of the previous
fiscal year, the termination bonus will be based on the bonus
paid, if any, to Mr. Alarie in respect of the fiscal year
two years prior to the year the termination occurs. The one-year
compensation payment is calculated as twenty-six (26) times
Mr. Alaries bi-weekly salary at the time of
termination plus an amount equal to the bonus paid to
Mr. Alarie in respect of the fiscal year prior to the year
in which termination occurs or, if no bonuses have been paid to
our Canadian employees generally in that year, an amount equal
to the bonus, if any, paid to Mr. Alarie in respect of the
fiscal year two years prior to the year in which termination
occurs.
Mr. Alarie would also be paid his base salary earned to the
termination date, a termination bonus, and a one-year
compensation payment if he were to end his employment within
six-months of us undergoing a change in control. A change in
control, for this purpose, would occur where a person acquires
more than 50% of our common shares or where the nominees of a
person holding at least 30% of our common shares are elected as
directors and comprise a majority of the board of directors. In
all other cases, Mr. Alarie may end his employment after
giving Stantec Consulting Ltd. three months notice.
69
Mr. Alaries contract also restricts Mr. Alarie
from competing with us, soliciting our employees, and soliciting
our clients for a period of two years following termination of
his employment.
Mark E. Jackson
Stantec Consulting Ltd. has an employment contract with
Mr. Jackson effective October 31, 2001. The contract
provides Mr. Jackson with a bi-weekly salary and a
discretionary annual bonus. Mr. Jacksons bi-weekly
salary was set at C$8,715 effective January 1, 2005. The
contract does not have a fixed term and terminates upon certain
events, including death, permanent incapacity and
Mr. Jackson reaching the age of sixty-five. The contract
may also be terminated by Stantec Consulting Ltd. with cause, by
either Stantec Consulting Ltd. or Mr. Jackson without
cause, or by Mr. Jackson upon a change of control.
If Stantec Consulting Ld. terminates Mr. Jackson without
cause, it must make a C$100,000 lump sum payment to him, pay him
a bonus equal to 35% of his base salary the previous year if no
bonus has been paid that year, and pay him a bonus of 35% of his
base salary in the termination year pro rated for that portion
of the year which has elapsed to the date of termination.
Mr. Jackson would also receive a C$100,000 lump sum payment
and his bonuses should he end his employment within six-months
of us undergoing a change in control. A change in control, for
this purpose, would occur where a person acquires more than 50%
of our common shares or where the nominees of a person holding
at least 30% of our common shares are elected as directors and
comprise a majority of the board of directors. In all other
cases, Mr. Jackson may end his employment after giving
Stantec Consulting Ltd. three months notice.
Mr. Jacksons contract also restricts Mr. Jackson
from competing with us, soliciting our employees, and soliciting
our clients for a period of two years following termination of
his employment.
W. Barry Lester
Stantec Consulting Ltd. entered into an employment contract with
W. Barry Lester effective December 19, 2002. The contract
provides Mr. Lester with a bi-weekly salary and a
discretionary annual bonus. Mr. Lesters bi-weekly
salary was set at C$9,308.25 effective January 1, 2005. The
contract does not have a fixed term and terminates upon certain
events, including death, permanent incapacity and
Mr. Lester reaching the age of sixty-five. The contract may
also be terminated by Stantec Consulting Ltd. with cause, by
either Stantec Consulting Ltd. or Mr. Lester without cause,
or by Mr. Lester upon a change of control.
If Stantec Consulting Ltd. terminates Mr. Lesters
employment without cause, Stantec Consulting Ltd. must pay him
his base salary earned to the termination date, a termination
bonus, and a one-year compensation payment. The termination
bonus that would be paid to Mr. Lester would be equal to
the bonus earned by Mr. Lester in the previous fiscal year
pro-rated for that portion of the year which elapses from the
end of the previous fiscal year to the date of termination. If
no bonus was paid to Mr. Lester in the previous fiscal
year, the termination bonus will be based on the bonus paid, if
any, to Mr. Lester in the fiscal year two years prior to
the year the termination occurs. The one-year compensation
payment is calculated as twenty-six (26) times
Mr. Lesters bi-weekly salary at the time of
termination plus an amount equal to the bonus paid to
Mr. Lester in respect of the fiscal year prior to the year
in which termination occurs or, if no bonuses have been paid to
our Canadian employees generally in that year, an amount equal
to the bonus, if any, paid to Mr. Lester in respect of the
fiscal year two years prior to the year in which termination
occurs.
Mr. Lester would also be paid his base salary earned to the
termination date, a termination bonus, and a one-year
compensation payment if he were to end his employment within
six-months of us undergoing a change in control. A change in
control, for this purpose, would occur where a person acquires
more than 50% of our common shares or where the nominees of a
person holding at least 30% of our common shares are elected as
directors and comprise a majority of the board of directors. In
all other cases, Mr. Lester may end his employment after
giving Stantec Consulting Ltd. three months notice.
Mr. Lesters contract also restricts Mr. Lester
from competing with us, soliciting our employees, and soliciting
our clients for a period of two years following termination of
his employment.
70
Information Concerning the Special Meeting
Keith Special Meeting
We are furnishing this document to you as part of the
solicitation of proxies by Keiths board of directors for
use at the special meeting in connection with the proposed
merger. This document provides you with the information you need
to know to be able to vote or instruct your vote to be cast at
the special meeting.
Date, Time and Place
The special meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:00 a.m.
Pacific Time, on September 15 at 19 Technology Drive,
Irvine, California 92618, unless it is postponed or adjourned.
The telephone number at that address is (949) 923-6001.
Purpose of the Special Meeting
This proxy statement/prospectus is being provided by, and the
enclosed proxy is solicited by and on behalf of, Keiths
board of directors for use at a special meeting of Keith
shareholders. The Keith board of directors:
|
|
|
|
|
has unanimously determined that the merger is fair to and in the
best interests of Keith and its shareholders; |
|
|
|
has unanimously approved and declared advisable the merger
agreement; and |
|
|
|
unanimously recommends that Keith common shareholders vote
FOR the approval of the merger agreement and
its terms; |
The purpose of the special meeting is for the shareholders of
Keith to consider and vote upon the approval of the merger
agreement and its terms, and other procedural matters incident
to the conduct of the special meeting.
Record Date; Voting Power
Only holders of shares of Keith common stock as of the close of
business on August 11, 2005, which is the record date for
the special meeting, will be entitled to receive notice of and
to vote at the special meeting and any adjournments or
postponements of the special meeting. Each share of Keith common
stock is entitled to one vote at the special meeting. At the
record date, 8,016,547 shares of Keith common stock were
issued, outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting.
Keiths issued and outstanding options do not have voting
rights. Accordingly, record holders of Keith options will not be
entitled to vote at the special meeting.
Required Vote; Quorum; How to Vote
Required Vote. The affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of Keith common stock as of
the record date is required to approve the merger agreement.
Because the required vote of the shareholders with respect to
the merger agreement is based upon the total number of
outstanding shares of Keith common stock, the failure to submit
a proxy card (or to vote in person at the special meeting) or
the abstention from voting by a shareholder will have the same
effect as a vote against approval of the merger agreement and
against the merger. Brokers holding shares of Keith common stock
as nominees will not have discretionary authority to vote those
shares in the absence of instructions from the beneficial owners
of those shares, so the failure to provide voting instructions
to your broker will also have the same effect as a vote against
the merger.
The obligation of Keith and Stantec to consummate the merger is
subject to, among other things, the condition that the Keith
shareholders approve the merger agreement. If Keiths
shareholders fail to approve
71
the merger agreement at the special meeting, each of Keith and
Stantec will have the right to terminate the merger agreement.
See The Merger Agreement Termination.
Quorum. The holders of a majority of the shares of Keith
common stock outstanding on the record date must be present,
either in person or by proxy, at the special meeting to
constitute a quorum. In general, abstentions and broker
non-votes are counted as present or represented at the special
meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum for the special
meeting.
How to Vote. A shareholder may vote in person at the
special meeting or by proxy without attending the special
meeting. To vote by proxy, a shareholder will have to complete
the enclosed proxy card, sign and date it and return it in the
enclosed postage prepaid envelope.
If you are a registered shareholder (that is you own Keith
common stock in your own name and not through a broker, nominee
or in some other street name capacity), you may vote
by proxy by using the accompanying proxy card. When you return a
proxy card that is properly signed and completed, the shares of
Keith common stock represented by the proxy will be voted as you
specify in the proxy card.
If your shares are held in street name, your broker will vote
your shares for you only if you provide instructions to your
broker on how to vote your shares. You should follow the
directions provided by your broker regarding how to instruct
your broker to vote your shares. If you do not give your broker
voting instructions, under the rules of the NASD, your broker
may not vote your shares on the merger proposal. If you do not
give your broker voting instructions and the broker does not
vote your shares, this is referred to as a broker
non-vote. Broker non-votes have the same effect as a vote
against the approval of the merger agreement and against the
merger.
If your shares are held in street name and you wish to vote
those shares in person at the special meeting, you must obtain
from your broker holding your Keith common stock a properly
executed legal proxy identifying you as a Keith
shareholder, authorizing you to act on behalf of the broker at
the special meeting and identifying the number of shares with
respect to which the authorization is granted.
All properly submitted proxies that are not revoked will be
voted at the special meeting as instructed on those proxies.
Submitted proxies containing no instructions will be voted in
favor of approval of the merger agreement and its terms.
Revocation of Proxy
A shareholder who submits a proxy may revoke it at any time
before it is voted by:
|
|
|
|
|
sending a written notice to the proxy solicitation agent stating
that the earlier proxy is revoked; |
|
|
|
submitting a proxy bearing a later date (using a new proxy card
and following the instructions provided on the proxy card); or |
|
|
|
attending the special meeting, revoking your proxy and voting in
person. |
If you hold your shares through a broker, you must give new
instructions to your broker prior to the special meeting or
obtain a properly executed legal proxy from your
broker to revoke your prior instructions and vote in person at
the special meeting.
72
Expenses of Solicitation
Keith and Stantec have agreed to share equally the costs of
filing, printing and mailing Stantecs registration
statement on Form F-4 and this proxy statement/ prospectus.
In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, directors, officers
and employees of Keith or Stantec, without receiving additional
compensation, may solicit proxies by telephone, by facsimile or
in person. Arrangements may also be made with brokerage firms
and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward
solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of shares of
Keith common stock held of record by these persons, and Keith
will reimburse these brokerage firms, custodians, nominees and
fiduciaries for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by
them in connection therewith. In addition, The Altman Group,
Inc. has been retained by Keith to assist in the solicitation of
proxies and Keith may also retain an additional solicitor. The
Altman Group, Inc. may contact holders of shares of Keith common
stock by mail, telephone, facsimile, telegraph and personal
interviews and may request brokers, dealers and other nominee
shareholders to forward materials to beneficial owners of shares
of Keith common stock. The Altman Group, Inc. will receive
US$10,000 as compensation for its services and will be
reimbursed for certain customary out-of-pocket expenses.
Exchange of Share Certificates
You should not send stock certificates with your proxies.
Transmittal documents for the surrender of Keith common stock
certificates in exchange for the merger consideration will be
mailed to the holders of Keith common stock as soon as
practicable after the effective time of the merger.
Questions About Voting Your Shares
If you have any questions about how to vote or direct a vote in
respect of your Keith common stock, you may call:
|
|
|
The Keith Companies, Inc.
19 Technology Drive
Irvine, California, USA 92618-2334
Phone: (949) 923-6001 Fax: (949) 923-6026
Attention: Investor Relations |
|
The Altman Group, Inc.
1275 Valley Brook Avenue
Lyndhurst, NJ 07071
Phone: (201) 806-2205
Attention: Charlotte Brown |
Miscellaneous
The grant of a proxy will confer discretionary authority on the
persons named in the proxy as proxy appointees to vote in
accordance with their best judgment on procedural matters
incident to the conduct of the special meeting. Proxy holders
may not use their discretionary authority to vote to adjourn or
postpone the special meeting.
73
The Merger
Background of The Merger
As part of Keiths long-term strategy to grow its business,
diversify its operations and increase shareholder value, the
Keith board of directors and senior management have, from time
to time, considered a variety of potential strategic
alternatives, which have included potential transactions with
other companies as well as remaining an independent public
company and consummating acquisitions or mergers with other
companies.
Beginning in March of 2003, Keith engaged in periodic
discussions with Stantec regarding a potential acquisition of
Keith by Stantec. On April 22, 2003, members of the Keith
senior management met with members of Stantecs senior
management at Keiths principal executive offices in
Irvine, California. Periodic discussions between Keiths
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Aram Keith, and
Stantecs President and Chief Executive Officer, Anthony
Franceschini, continued intermittently during the period between
April 2003 and December 2003. Although there were general
discussions on valuation approaches, no formal proposals were
made with respect to potential financial terms for a
combination. In May 2003, Keith contacted Bear Stearns to
discuss a possible engagement to assist Keith in evaluating the
suitability of Stantec as an acquiror and to act as Keiths
financial advisor with respect to a potential sale of Keith. In
December 2003, discussions between Stantec and Keith were
suspended after the parties were unable to agree on valuation.
Following the suspension of discussions with Stantec, the Keith
board of directors and senior management examined Keiths
strategic direction and positioning in the market. Although the
results of operations of Keith had improved over the three years
ended December 31, 2003, Keith common stock had traded as
high as $25.63 per share in March 2001 and as low as $7.60
in October 2001 and was trading at $13.62 at the end of 2003.
Keith continued to be highly reliant on the residential real
estate services sector in California, which made it vulnerable
to cyclical changes in that sector or geographic region. Keith
had planned to be able to diversify its business through the
implementation of an acquisition program; however, its last
acquisition had occurred in March 2002. Further, the relatively
small size of Keith made it difficult to attract an
institutional following in the financial markets. The board of
directors and senior management concluded that it would be
unlikely to maximize shareholder value unless it was able to
successfully execute on an aggressive acquisition program that
would allow it to materially grow its business and diversify its
operations. An alternative would be to seek an acquiror of the
company.
In early 2004, senior management of Keith developed a list of
potential acquirors of Keith. Included on that list was Stantec.
During 2004, Mr. Keith contacted the entities on the list
of potential acquirors or their financial advisors to assess
their interest in a strategic transaction. While most of the
entities that Keith contacted indicated that they had limited
interest in pursuing a transaction, one such company entered
into a confidentiality agreement and conducted preliminary
investigations into effecting a transaction. These preliminary
discussions terminated when the potential acquirer indicated
that it was unwilling to consider an acquisition price
representing a premium to the prevailing market price for
Keiths common stock. Mr. Keith periodically reported
to the Keith board of directors regarding these contacts. No
formal proposal to acquire Keith resulted from these discussions.
Up through the first quarter of 2005, Keith continued to
evaluate potential acquisition targets. As part of this process,
in August 2003, Keith engaged Houlihan Lokey Howard &
Zukin to assist it in its search for potential candidates for
Keith to consider acquiring. During this period, Keith was
presented with over 100 potential candidates for Keith to
acquire. Although Keith conducted formal due diligence on the
most promising candidates and, in some instances, negotiated the
terms of a potential transaction, none of the candidates
ultimately met Keiths acquisition and valuation criteria.
Keith evaluated potential acquisitions based upon a variety of
factors, including, industry and geographic considerations such
as Keiths goal to diversify its business across geographic
regions and industries; the professional qualifications and
skills of the candidates professional staff; the quality
of the candidates customers and the history of the
candidates relationship with its customers; the
candidates results of operations and the quality of its
earnings; the purchase price sought by the candidates
shareholders; whether the transaction would be accretive or
dilutive to Keith; and the EBIT, operating profit margins and
various balance sheet ratios of the candidate.
74
During the period from January 2004 to January 2005,
Mr. Keith and Mr. Franceschini maintained informal
contacts with one another, but did not discuss further plans for
a combination. In early January 2005, during one of these
informal contacts, Mr. Franceschini informed Mr. Keith
that Stantec might be interested in renewing discussions.
Mr. Keith informed the Keith board of directors of this
expression of possible interest at its regular meeting on
February 8, 2005 and indicated he expected further contacts
with Stantec following Keiths earnings announcement,
scheduled for February 10, 2005. The board of directors of
Keith authorized management to take appropriate steps to
evaluate the interest level of Stantec, including Stantecs
expectations regarding valuation. The board of directors
directed management to assess Stantecs interest level on a
relatively expedited basis and avoid extended discussions of the
type that had occurred with Stantec in 2003. On
February 10, 2005, Mr. Franceschini contacted
Mr. Keith and informed him that Stantec was prepared to
propose the terms of a potential transaction, subject to board
approval and customary due diligence. Mr. Keith requested
that any proposal be approved by the Stantec board of directors
prior to presentation to Keith.
On February 18, 2005, Keith and Stantec entered into a
confidentiality agreement. On February 25, 2005,
Mr. Franceschini informed Mr. Keith in a telephone
conversation that the board of directors of Stantec had
authorized him to discuss the financial terms of a proposal to
acquire all of the outstanding shares of Keith. The proposal,
which was non-binding, contemplated an all stock transaction
where each share of Keith common stock would be exchanged for
the right to receive 0.85 of a Stantec common share. Based on
the trading price of Stantec common shares on the Toronto Stock
Exchange and the Canadian/ U.S. dollar exchange rate on
that date, senior management of Keith estimated that such a
transaction would yield a value of approximately
US$17.35 per share to the Keith shareholders.
Mr. Franceschini requested a meeting with the senior
management of Keith to review the proposal.
On March 3, 2005, Mr. Franceschini visited
Keiths principal executive offices in Irvine, California
and met with Mr. Keith, Edward Muller, a member of the
Keith board of directors, Eric Nielsen, President and Chief
Operating Officer of Keith, Gary Campanaro, Chief Financial
Officer and a member of the board of directors of Keith and
Thomas Braun, Keiths President, Real Estate Development
Services. During this meeting, Mr. Franceschini made a
presentation to the Keith representatives in which he reviewed
the non-binding proposal he had discussed with Mr. Keith on
the telephone and discussed Stantecs view of the strategic
advantages of a combination of the two companies and the
financial rationale for the Stantec proposal.
On March 4, 2005, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the
board of directors of Keith, Mr. Keith discussed the
Stantec proposal with the Keith board of directors. Following
this discussion, the board of directors authorized management to
engage Bear Stearns to assist Keith in evaluating Stantecs
proposal and the potential combination of the two companies.
On March 10, 2005, the board of directors of Keith held a
special meeting at the Los Angeles offices of its legal counsel,
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. In addition to the
members of the board, the meeting was attended by
Mr. Nielsen and Jules Miller, General Counsel of Keith.
During that meeting, Bear Stearns made a presentation to the
board of directors concerning various valuation metrics. Bear
Stearns presentation included an examination of
Keiths and Stantecs historical stock price
performance, a summary of Wall Street analyst commentary
relating to both companies and a comparison of the value of
Stantecs offer with precedent transactions in Keiths
industry. Bear Stearns presentation also included a
comparison of Stantecs all stock offer with an offer which
was comprised of cash and stock. Keiths management
presented the board of directors with an extensive analysis of
the risks and opportunities facing Keith as a stand-alone
entity. Thereafter, the board of directors reviewed and engaged
in a lengthy discussion regarding the proposal from Stantec,
concluding that the valuation inherent in the proposal was
unsatisfactory and expressing a preference for a transaction
with a fixed value, consisting of a mix of stock and cash. Akin
Gump led a discussion regarding the applicable fiduciary duties
of a board considering a sale of a company. This discussion
included consideration of whether an auction of Keith would
maximize shareholder value. The board of directors of Keith
determined in its business judgment based on information
provided by Bear Stearns and management concerning the
communications with prospective acquirors that an auction at
that time would likely not be the best means to maximize
shareholder value. The board of directors instructed
75
management to continue with negotiations to determine if a
higher value and more favorable terms were achievable with
Stantec.
At this meeting, the Keith board of directors, senior management
of Keith and the representatives of Bear Stearns and Akin Gump
also discussed other material transactional issues, such as
flexibility for the board to consider superior proposals,
break-up fees, representation on the Stantec board following a
merger, due diligence and timing. The Keith board of directors
approved the terms of the engagement of Bear Stearns as
Keiths financial advisor. On March 11, 2005, Bear
Stearns and Keith executed an engagement letter in which Keith
engaged Bear Stearns as its financial advisor.
On March 17, 2005, Mr. Franceschini met with
representatives of Keith senior management and Bear Stearns at
Keiths principal executive offices in Irvine, California.
At that meeting, Bear Stearns presented its determination that,
if Stantec were to modify its offer such that it involved a mix
of 50% Stantec common shares and 50% cash instead of all common
shares, Stantec could increase its offer without eliminating the
accretive effect of the transaction. Following Bear
Stearns presentation analyzing the financial impact of the
merger on the two companies, representatives of Keith made a
non-binding proposal for a merger with a fixed value of
US$23.00 per share, comprised of US$11.50 in cash and
US$11.50 in Stantec common shares, computed based on the trading
value of the Stantec common shares at the closing of the merger.
On March 21, 2005, Mr. Franceschini informed
Mr. Keith in a telephone conversation that Stantec was
willing to increase the price it was willing to offer to
US$20.91 per share and agree to terms consisting of half cash
and half Stantec common shares, but consisting of a fixed number
of shares rather than the fixed value proposed by Keith.
Mr. Keith indicated that the revised price and terms were
still not satisfactory. A number of conversations between
representatives of Stantec and Keith took place over the course
of the next several days regarding valuation issues and terms.
On March 24, 2005, Mr. Franceschini confirmed to
Mr. Keith that Stantec was willing to increase the price it
was willing to pay to US$22.00 per share but would not
consider a change in terms. The terms proposed were US$11.00 and
0.46 of a Stantec common share. During the morning of
March 28, 2005, Mr. Keith and Mr. Franceschini
held a telephone conversation in which Mr. Keith indicated
that he would recommend the Stantec offer to the Keith board of
directors if it were modified to provide for US$11.00 cash and
US$11.00 of Stantec common shares, computed by reference to the
average trading price of the Stantec common shares at the time
of a closing. At a special meeting of the board of directors of
Keith held on that date, attended by the members of the board,
Mr. Nielsen, Mr. Miller and representatives of Bear
Stearns and Akin Gump, the board directed Mr. Keith to
inform Stantec that the price and terms were still not
satisfactory. On March 29, 2005, Mr. Franceschini
countered with US$11.00 cash, US$5.50 of Stantec common shares
computed by reference to the average trading price of the
Stantec common stock at the time of the closing of the merger
and 0.23 of a Stantec common share. Mr. Keith agreed to
consult with the Keith board of directors and respond to
Mr. Franceschini by the following day.
During the period from March 25, 2005 to March 30,
2005, Akin Gump and Jeff Lloyd, General Counsel to Stantec,
exchanged drafts of a summary of non-binding terms for the
acquisition of Keith by Stantec and held several telephone
conversations during which the summary of non-binding terms were
finalized.
On the morning of March 30, 2005, the Keith board of
directors held a telephonic meeting during which Keith
management presented its analysis of the proposal. Akin Gump
summarized the terms of the proposal and discussed the fiduciary
duties of the board of directors. Representatives of Bear
Stearns presented their analysis of the proposal and the
proposed purchase price, including an analysis of the
sensitivity of the stock portion of Stantecs proposal to
market conditions and its impact on expected value to
Keiths shareholders. The Keith board of directors engaged
in a lengthy discussion regarding the proposal, which included
consideration of whether any other alternatives were reasonably
available that would provide greater value to the Keith
shareholders, including continuation as an independent entity or
sale to another potential buyer. The board of directors also
considered whether conducting an auction would likely result in
the maximization of shareholder value. The board of directors
reviewed the efforts by management to generate interest among
numerous potential acquirors and the results of those efforts.
The board of directors determined in its business
76
judgment that an auction was unlikely to result in a superior
offer to the Stantec proposal, and that the Stantec proposal was
the best alternative reasonably available to Keith shareholders
in the near term. The board of directors directed management to
once again request Stantec to fix the value of the Stantec
common stock to be paid in the merger and the meeting was
adjourned until such time as Mr. Keith could conclude those
discussions. Later that afternoon, the special meeting
reconvened and Mr. Keith reported to the Keith board of
directors that Stantec was unwilling to modify its proposal.
After a discussion, the board of directors of Keith authorized
management of Keith to proceed to conduct due diligence and
negotiate definitive agreements substantially in accord with the
summary of non-binding terms, subject to approval by the board
of directors prior to the execution of a definitive merger
agreement.
During the weeks of April 3, 2005 and April 10, 2005,
each of Stantec and Keith conducted a comprehensive due
diligence investigation of the other party.
On April 3, 2005, Shearman & Sterling LLP, legal
counsel for Stantec, distributed the first draft of the
definitive merger agreement to Akin Gump. Over the course of the
next eleven days, the parties negotiated the terms of the
definitive merger agreement as well as the form of stockholders
support agreement.
On April 5, 2005, the Keith board of directors held a
telephonic meeting attended by representatives of Akin Gump and
Bear Stearns to discuss the initial draft of the merger
agreement. Prior to the meeting, copies of the draft merger
agreement and a summary of the terms of the merger agreement and
other supporting materials prepared by Akin Gump were
distributed to the board of directors. During the meeting, the
board expressed the view that the shareholders of Keith should
be able to elect to receive cash or stock as merger
consideration, with any excess elections to be prorated. With
respect to the merger agreement, Akin Gump indicated that it had
concerns regarding several terms of the proposed merger
agreement, including, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
the significant number of conditions to Stantecs
performance of its obligations at closing; |
|
|
|
the absence of a requirement that Keith receive a tax opinion
from its counsel as a condition to Keiths performance of
its obligations at closing; |
|
|
|
the requirement that the Stantec common stock be listed on the
New York Stock Exchange or the Nasdaq National Market as a
condition to Stantecs performance of its obligations at
closing; |
|
|
|
the requirement that key members of Keith management execute
employment agreements as a condition to Stantecs
performance of its obligations at closing; |
|
|
|
the treatment of the outstanding stock options and restricted
shares of Keith; |
|
|
|
a requirement that Keith have a minimum cash balance at closing
of at least US$48 million; |
|
|
|
the limitation on Keiths ability to terminate the
agreement in response to an unsolicited acquisition proposal
with superior terms; and |
|
|
|
the obligation to pay Stantecs expenses in addition to a
break-up fee in the event the agreement was terminated in
certain circumstances by Keith. |
At the conclusion of the meeting, the board of directors
directed Akin Gump to submit its proposed changes to the merger
agreement, including the request that the Keith shareholders
have a right to elect between the forms of merger consideration,
to Shearman & Sterling LLP.
Between April 5, 2005 and April 11, 2005, Akin Gump
and Shearman & Sterling LLP continued to negotiate the
terms and conditions of the definitive transaction documents. On
April 11, 2005, the Keith board of directors convened a
telephonic board meeting to discuss the status of the
negotiations. Also present at this meeting were representatives
of Akin Gump, Bear Stearns, Mr. Nielsen and
Mr. Miller. Prior to the meeting there had been distributed
to each of the members of the board revised drafts of the
transaction documents and a summary of the status of the
negotiations prepared by Akin Gump. Akin Gump reported that
during the course of its discussions with Shearman &
Sterling LLP between April 7, 2005 and April 10, 2005,
Akin Gump, in consultation with senior management of Keith, had
managed to resolve a substantial
77
number of issues that had been of concern to the board of
directors at its last meeting. Although the Keith board of
directors was pleased with the progress made during the prior
days with respect to closing conditions and merger
consideration, they remained concerned that the merger agreement
still included conditions to Stantecs obligations at
closing tied to Keith having a minimum cash balance of
US$48 million at closing and the execution of employment
agreements by key members of Keith management; the merger
agreement did not provide the Keith board of directors the right
to terminate the merger agreement in the event that Keith
received a superior offer from a third party; and the merger
agreement continued to provide for the payment of Stantecs
expenses in addition to a break up fee. After consultation with
Akin Gump, the Keith board of directors determined that it
needed to continue to press for the elimination of the execution
of employment agreements by the managers as a condition, the
elimination of the payment of expenses and the inclusion of a
right to terminate the merger agreement in the event of receipt
of a superior offer from a third party. The Keith board of
directors considered the latter term particularly important so
as to afford it the opportunity to continue to exercise its
fiduciary duties following a signing of a merger agreement. With
respect to the condition that Keith have a minimum cash balance
of $48 million at closing, Bear Stearns advised the board
that such a condition was reasonable in light of the context of
the earlier negotiations on the amount of the merger
consideration, but that the level should be set at an amount
that management was comfortable could be achieved. At this
meeting, representatives of Bear Stearns, Akin Gump and the
Keith management also presented the Keith board of directors
with a report on their due diligence investigation.
Discussions between Akin Gump and Shearman & Sterling
LLP continued during the period from April 11, 2005 to
April 13, 2005 in an effort to resolve remaining open
issues in the merger agreement. During this period, Keith and
Stantec substantially finalized the merger agreement and the
other transaction documents and completed their respective due
diligence investigations. On the evening of April 13, 2005,
the Keith board of directors held a special telephonic meeting.
Also participating in this telephonic meeting were
Mr. Nielsen and Mr. Miller of Keith and
representatives of Akin Gump and Bear Stearns. Prior to that
meeting, there had been distributed to the Keith board of
directors copies of the merger agreement and other transaction
documents in substantially the form they were subsequently
executed. Akin Gump also distributed to the Keith board of
directors a legal memorandum. At the meeting, Akin Gump
summarized the resolution of issues that had previously been
considered by the Keith board of directors. Akin Gump reported
that Stantec had agreed to Keiths request for a right of
termination in the event of a superior third party offer if
Keith agreed to pay Stantecs expenses in addition to a
break-up fee. Stantec also agreed to eliminate the execution of
the employment agreements as a condition to closing. After
discussion with senior management of Keith, Stantec agreed to
fix Keiths minimum cash balance at closing at
US$40 million. The Keith board of directors expressed
concern that the merger agreement continued to obligate Keith to
pay Stantecs expenses in addition to a break-up fee in the
event of termination in certain circumstances. Akin Gump
informed the board that Stantec was insistent on this provision
but the aggregate of the break up fee and expenses reasonably
likely in this circumstance were within the range of break-up
fees allowed by the courts in the exercise of a boards
fiduciary duties. At the meeting, Bear Stearns reported that it
was prepared to issue its fairness opinion, if requested.
During the morning of April 14, 2005, the board of
directors of Keith convened a special meeting at the principal
executive offices of Keith in Irvine, California. The meeting
was attended by all members of Keiths board of directors,
Mr. Nielsen, Mr. Miller and representatives of Akin
Gump and Bear Stearns. Prior to the meeting, copies of the draft
merger agreement, draft stockholders support agreement and
letter between Stantec and Mr. Keith (each in substantially
the form subsequently executed), and legal memoranda were
distributed to the board of directors. During the meeting, Akin
Gump presented the board of directors with a detailed analysis
of the terms of the transaction and reviewed the board of
directors fiduciary duties. Members of management provided
its recommendations to the board of directors. Bear Stearns then
gave a presentation to the board of directors during which it
reviewed for the members of the board its analysis leading to
the conclusions set forth in its written opinion, which analysis
is described in greater detail below in the section entitled
Opinion of Keiths Financial Advisor. Bear
Stearns then orally presented the opinion of Bear Stearns,
confirmed in writing by Bear Stearns in a letter delivered to
Keiths board of directors at the meeting, that as of
April 14, 2005, based on the qualifications, assumptions,
limitations and other matters set forth in the letter, the
consideration per share to be received by Keiths public
shareholders in the merger of
78
(i) US$11.00 per share, (ii) 0.23 of a Stantec
common share and (iii) an amount of Stantec common shares
equal to US$5.50 divided by the 20 day simple average of
the daily weighted average trading price of Stantec common
shares, was fair to the Keith public shareholders from a
financial point of view. Following a further discussion, the
Keith board of directors unanimously approved the merger and the
merger agreement and the other transaction documents and
unanimously resolved to recommend that Keiths shareholders
vote their shares in favor of the merger agreement and its terms.
At approximately 1:45 pm California time on April 14,
2005, Keith and Stantec executed and delivered the merger
agreement and shortly afterwards issued a joint press release
announcing the execution of the merger agreement.
Recommendation of the Keith Board of Directors
KEITHS BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS DETERMINED THAT THE MERGER
AGREEMENT AND THE MERGER ARE FAIR TO, AND IN THE BEST INTERESTS
OF, THE KEITH PUBLIC SHAREHOLDERS AND HAS APPROVED AND DECLARED
ADVISABLE THE MERGER AGREEMENT, THE MERGER AND THE OTHER
TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THE MERGER AGREEMENT, AND
UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE IN FAVOR OF APPROVAL OF THE
MERGER AGREEMENT AND ITS TERMS.
In considering the recommendation of the Keith board of
directors with respect to the merger, you should be aware that
certain directors and officers of Keith have interests in the
merger that are different from, or are in addition to, the
interests of Keith shareholders generally. See
Interests of Keith and Stantec Executive
Officers and Directors in the Merger.
Reasons for Keiths Board Recommendation
The following discussion of the information and factors
considered by the Keith board of directors is not, and is not
intended to be, exhaustive. In light of the variety of factors
considered in connection with its evaluation of the merger and
the complexity of these matters, the Keith board of directors
did not find it practicable to, and did not, quantify or
otherwise attempt to assign relative weights to the various
factors considered in reaching its determination. In addition,
the Keith board of directors did not undertake to make any
specific determination as to whether any particular factor, or
any aspect of any particular factor, was favorable or
unfavorable to the ultimate determination of the Keith board of
directors, but rather, the Keith board of directors conducted an
overall analysis of the factors described below, including
discussions with and questioning of members of the Keith senior
management and legal and financial advisors. The Keith board of
directors viewed its position and recommendation as being based
on the totality of the information presented. In the course of
reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement and the
merger, the Keith board of directors consulted with members of
the Keith senior management, legal counsel and its financial
advisor, reviewed a significant amount of information and
considered a number of factors, including, among others, the
following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the current state of Keiths business, including the fact
that continued expansion and geographic and industry
diversification, each of which was considered essential to
protect its competitive position, would require significant
future investment in the expansion of its operations,
infrastructure, technology platform and managerial team; |
|
|
|
Keiths prospects and strategic objectives to expand its
market share and diversify its service offerings, which are
limited by a shortage of attractive acquisition targets meeting
Keiths acquisition criteria, expansion opportunities and
qualified employees; |
|
|
|
Keiths dependence on the residential real estate market in
California and the fact that a decline in demand in this market
sector could have a disproportionate effect on its net revenues
and profitability; |
|
|
|
the range of possible benefits to Keith shareholders of
continuing to operate independently and the timing and the
likelihood of accomplishing growth and diversification of
Keiths service offerings by |
79
|
|
|
|
|
operating independently, and the Keith board of directors
assessment that the merger with Stantec presented a superior
alternative to continuing to operate independently; and |
|
|
|
the limited attention of the public market to small
capitalization stocks outside the technology sector, such as
Keith. |
In the course of its deliberations, the Keith board of directors
also considered, among other things, the following positive
factors regarding the proposed merger with Stantec:
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that as of April 13, 2005, the trading day prior
to approval of the merger by the Keith board of directors, the
value of the merger consideration represented a premium of
approximately US$4.87, or 28.6% over the US$17.00 closing sale
price for Keith common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National
Market on April 13, 2005; |
|
|
|
managements review of the companies which might be
expected to be interested in acquiring Keith and
managements discussion with several companies regarding
their interest in an acquisition and the preliminary discussion
by members of the Keith senior management with certain of these
potential acquirors and the lack of any offers to acquire Keith,
all of which led the board to believe that the likelihood of
obtaining a superior offer, either through an auction or
otherwise, was outweighed by the benefits to the Keith
shareholders of the merger; |
|
|
|
geographic and industry diversification achieved by a
combination with Stantec would reduce Keiths exposure to
cyclicality within the residential real estate service sector; |
|
|
|
the financial presentation and written opinion of Bear Stearns
to the Keith board of directors to the effect that, as of
April 14, 2005, and based on the qualifications,
assumptions, limitations and other matters set forth in its
written opinion, the consideration to be received by the public
shareholders of Keith pursuant to the merger agreement is fair,
from a financial point of view, to those holders (the full text
of this opinion, which sets forth the assumptions made,
procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the
review undertaken by Bear Stearns in connection with the
opinion, is attached as Appendix B to this proxy statement/
prospectus); |
|
|
|
the likelihood that the proposed acquisition would be
consummated, in light of the conditions to the parties
obligations to complete the merger and the reputation and
financial capabilities of Stantec; |
|
|
|
the extensive arms-length negotiations between Stantec and
Keith, leading the board to believe that the merger
consideration offered by Stantec represented the highest amount
Stantec would agree to pay and that the terms of the merger
agreement and related documents, including the parties
representations, warranties and covenants, and the conditions to
their respective obligations, were as favorable to Keith as
Stantec would be willing to accept; |
|
|
|
the potential for synergies between Stantec and Keith, which
include diversification of service offerings and geographic
coverage, Keiths opportunity to integrate Stantecs
more advanced enterprise reporting and management technology
systems and other overhead cost savings, that could lead to
improved prospects for growth and revenue generation at Stantec,
which would benefit former Keith shareholders; |
|
|
|
the fact that pursuant to the merger agreement, Keith is not
prohibited from responding in the manner provided in the merger
agreement to certain alternative proposals which the Keith board
of directors determines may constitute a superior offer and
where Keiths board of directors determines in good faith,
after consultation with independent legal counsel, that failure
to respond would cause the members of the Keith board of
directors to breach their fiduciary duties under applicable
law; and |
|
|
|
the fact that the provisions of the merger agreement allow
Keiths board of directors, under certain circumstances to
withdraw its recommendation for the approval of the merger or
terminate the merger agreement if it is presented with a
superior proposal. |
80
In the course of its deliberations, the Keith board of directors
also considered, among other things, the following negative
factors regarding the proposed merger:
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that the announcement and pendency of the merger could
have a material adverse impact on Keiths business and
operations; |
|
|
|
the risk that the merger may not be completed if either
Keiths or Stantecs legal counsel were not to deliver
a tax opinion which is a condition to each of Keiths and
Stantecs obligation to complete the merger; |
|
|
|
the risk that the merger may not be completed if the Stantec
common shares to be issued in the merger are not listed on
either the New York Stock Exchange or the Nasdaq National
Market, which is a condition to Keiths obligation to
complete the merger; |
|
|
|
the risk that the merger may not be completed if the other
conditions to Stantecs obligation to complete the merger
are not satisfied and the right of Stantec to terminate the
merger agreement under certain circumstances; |
|
|
|
the fact that the restrictions contained in the merger agreement
on Keiths rights to solicit superior proposals, as well as
the US$3.0 million termination fee plus reimbursement of
certain Stantec expenses under certain circumstances, presents
an additional cost to any other potential acquiror which might
be interested in acquiring Keith; and |
|
|
|
the interests that certain of Keith directors and executive
officers may have with respect to the merger in addition to
their interests as Keith shareholders generally, as described in
The Merger Interests of Keiths and
Stantecs Executive Officers and Directors in the
Merger. |
Opinion of Keiths Financial Advisor
In connection with the proposed merger, Keith engaged Bear,
Stearns & Co. Inc. to provide financial advisory
services. Bear Stearns was selected to act as the financial
advisor based on its qualifications, expertise and reputation.
On April 14, 2005, Bear Stearns delivered its written
opinion to Keiths board of directors that, as of the date
of the opinion and subject to and based on the factors
considered in its opinion, the merger consideration was fair
from a financial point of view to the holders of shares of
Keiths common stock.
The full text of Bear Stearns written opinion, dated as of
April 14, 2005, which sets forth, among other things, the
assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and
limitations on the review undertaken by Bear Stearns in
rendering its opinion, is attached as Appendix B to this
proxy statement/ prospectus. Holders of Keiths common
stock are urged to, and should, read this opinion carefully and
in its entirety.
The opinion of Bear Stearns was necessarily based upon the
economic, monetary, market and other conditions as they were in
effect on, and the information made available to Bear Stearns as
of, the date of its opinion. Bear Stearns did not assume any
responsibility for updating or revising its opinion based on
circumstances or events occurring after the date of its opinion.
The opinion of Bear Stearns is directed to Keiths board of
directors, addresses only the fairness of the merger
consideration from a financial point of view to the holders of
Keiths common stock as of the date of the opinion and does
not address any other aspect of the merger or constitute a
recommendation to Keiths board of directors or to any of
Keiths shareholders as to how to vote at the special
meeting. The summary of the opinion set forth in this proxy
statement/ prospectus is qualified in its entirety by reference
to the full text of the opinion, which is attached to and
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/ prospectus.
In arriving at its opinion, Bear Stearns:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available historical financial
statements and other business and financial information of Keith
and Stantec; |
81
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain operating and financial data concerning Keith
and Stantecs business and prospects prepared by the
managements of Keith and Stantec, respectively; |
|
|
|
discussed Keiths business, operations, historical
financial results, a range of projected financial results and
future prospects with senior executives of Keith; |
|
|
|
reviewed certain projections for Stantec for the year ended
December 31, 2005 published by certain equity research
analysts; |
|
|
|
discussed Stantecs business, operations, historical and
projected financial results and future prospects with senior
executives of Stantec and Keith; |
|
|
|
reviewed the historical prices, trading multiples and trading
volumes for Keiths common stock and Stantecs common
stock; |
|
|
|
reviewed publicly available financial data, stock market
performance data and trading multiples of companies generally
comparable to Keith and Stantec; |
|
|
|
reviewed the financial terms, to the extent publicly available,
of certain mergers and acquisitions transactions involving
companies generally comparable to Keith; |
|
|
|
performed discounted cash flow sensitivity analyses based on the
range of projected financial results for Keith furnished to it
by senior executives of Keith; |
|
|
|
reviewed the potential pro forma impact of the merger on
Stantecs financial results, financial condition and
capitalization; |
|
|
|
reviewed the financial terms and conditions of the merger
agreement; and |
|
|
|
performed such other studies, analyses, inquiries and
investigations as it deemed appropriate. |
Bear Stearns assumed and relied upon, without independent
verification, the accuracy and completeness of the information
supplied or otherwise made available to it by Keith and Stantec
for the purposes of its opinion. Bear Stearns did not make any
independent valuation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities
of Keith or Stantec and was not furnished with any such
appraisals. Bear Stearns did not solicit, nor was it asked to
solicit, third party acquisition interest in Keith.
With respect to the range of projected financial results
discussed with the senior management of Keith, Bear Stearns
assumed that they had been reasonably prepared on bases
reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments
of senior management of Keith as to the expected future
financial performance of Keith. Bear Stearns did not assume any
responsibility for the independent verification of any
information provided to it or the range of projected financial
results Keiths management discussed with it. Bear Stearns
relied on the assurances of senior executives of Keith and
Stantec that they were unaware of any facts that would make the
information provided to Bear Stearns or the range of projected
financial results furnished to it incomplete or misleading. In
rendering its opinion, Bear Stearns assumed that the merger
would be consummated in a timely manner on the terms described
in the merger agreement, including, among other things, that the
merger will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code. In addition, Bear Stearns
assumed that obtaining the necessary regulatory and third party
approvals for the merger will not have material effect on Keith
or Stantec.
Bear Stearns did not express any opinion as to the price at
which Keiths common stock or Stantecs common shares
would trade subsequent to the announcement of the execution of
the merger agreement or as to the price at which Stantecs
common shares may trade subsequent to the consummation of the
merger. The opinion of Bear Stearns did not address the relative
merits of the merger as compared to other transactions or
business strategies that might exist for Keith, the financing of
the merger, the effects of any other transaction in which Keith
might engage or its underlying business decision to enter into
the merger agreement.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
performed by Bear Stearns in preparing its opinion, which is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the
opinion attached as Appendix B to this proxy statement/
prospectus. This summary does not purport to be a complete
description of the
82
financial analyses performed by Bear Stearns or its
presentations to Keiths board of directors. The order of
analyses described does not represent relative importance or
weight given to the analyses performed by Bear Stearns. Some of
the summaries of the financial analyses include information
presented in a tabular format. These tables must be read
together with the full text of each summary and alone are not a
complete description of Bear Stearns financial analyses.
Except as otherwise noted, the following quantitative
information is based on market and financial data as it existed
on or before April 14, 2005 and is not necessarily
indicative of current market conditions.
|
|
|
Comparable Company Analysis |
Bear Stearns compared financial information and valuation ratios
relating to Keith to corresponding data and ratios from a group
of publicly traded engineering and construction companies that
Bear Stearns deemed comparable to Keith, referred to as the
Public E&C Companies Peer Group.
The Public E&C Companies Peer Group consisted of the
following nine publicly traded companies that Bear Stearns
deemed comparable to Keith:
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Location |
|
Trading Symbol |
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V.
|
|
The Netherlands |
|
NYSE: CBI |
Granite Construction Incorporated
|
|
Westonville, California |
|
NYSE: GVA |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
|
|
Pasadena, California |
|
NYSE: JEC |
Michael Baker Corporation
|
|
Moon Township, Pennsylvania |
|
AMEX: BKR |
Shaw Group, Inc.
|
|
Baton Rouge, Louisiana |
|
NYSE: SGR |
Tetra Tech, Inc.
|
|
Pasadena, California |
|
NASDAQ: TTEK |
TRC Companies, Inc.
|
|
Windsor, CT |
|
NYSE: TRR |
URS Corporation
|
|
San Francisco, California |
|
NYSE: URS |
Washington Group International, Inc.
|
|
Boise, Idaho |
|
NASDAQ: WGII |
This analysis produced multiples of selected valuation data as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keith(1) | |
|
Mean | |
|
Median | |
|
Harmonic Mean | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Price to 2005 estimated earnings per share
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
Price to 2006 estimated earnings per share
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
Price to 2005 estimated enterprise value/ EBITDA
per share
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
Price to 2006 estimated enterprise value/ EBITDA
per share
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Based on merger consideration of US$21.87 per share, which
in turn was based on the closing price of the Stantec common
stock on April 14, 2005 assuming an exchange rate of C$1.00
to US$0.808. |
Bear Stearns chose these companies based on a review of publicly
traded engineering and construction companies that possessed
general business, operating and financial characteristics
representative of companies in the industry in which Keith
operates. Bear Stearns noted that none of the companies reviewed
is identical to Keith and that, accordingly, the analysis of
such companies necessarily involves complex considerations and
judgments concerning differences in the business, operating and
financial characteristics of each company and other factors that
affect the public market values of such companies.
|
|
|
Precedent Transaction Analysis |
Bear Stearns reviewed a group of merger and acquisition
transactions involving companies that it deemed relevant to
Keith. The group consisted of the following eight precedent
transactions announced and completed since May 1999, with
transaction equity values ranging between US$56.3 million
and US$323.8 million. Bear
83
Stearns selected these transactions by searching filings made
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, public company
disclosures, press releases, industry and press reports,
databases and other sources.
|
|
|
|
|
Announcement Date |
|
Acquiror |
|
Target |
|
|
|
|
|
12/10/2003
|
|
CH2M Hill Companies, Ltd. |
|
Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc. |
12/19/2002
|
|
EMCOR Group, Inc. |
|
Consolidated Engineering Services Inc. |
11/20/2001
|
|
MACTEC, Inc. |
|
Law Companies Group, Inc. |
03/31/2001
|
|
American Capital Strategies Ltd. |
|
Weston Solutions, Inc. |
03/24/2000
|
|
MACTEC, Inc. |
|
Harding Lawson Associates Group, Inc. |
05/10/1999
|
|
IT Group, Inc. |
|
EMCON |
05/05/1999
|
|
URS Corporation |
|
Dames & Moore Group |
05/03/1999
|
|
Investor Group |
|
Isolux-Wat SA |
Bear Stearns compared the resulting multiples of selected
valuation data to multiples for Keith derived from the estimated
consideration payable in the merger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keith(1) | |
|
Mean | |
|
Median | |
|
Harmonic Mean | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Price to Premium, One Week Prior
|
|
|
27.1 |
% |
|
|
29.1 |
% |
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
|
NM |
|
Enterprise Value to LTM Revenue
|
|
|
1.42 |
x |
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
Enterprise Value to LTM EBITDA
|
|
|
9.0 |
x |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Equity Value to LTM Net Income
|
|
|
21.9 |
x |
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Based on merger consideration of US$21.87 per share |
Bear Stearns chose these acquisition transactions based on a
review of completed acquisition transactions involving target
companies that possessed general business, operating and
financial characteristics representative of companies in the
industry in which Keith operates. Bear Stearns noted that none
of these acquisition transactions or subject target companies
reviewed is identical to the merger or to Keith and that,
accordingly, the analysis of such acquisition transactions
necessarily involves complex considerations and judgments
concerning differences in the business, operating and financial
characteristics of each subject target company and each
acquisition transaction and other factors that affect the values
implied in such acquisition transactions.
|
|
|
Discounted Cash Flow Sensitivity Analysis |
Bear Stearns performed a discounted cash flow sensitivity
analysis of Keith for the purpose of estimating the equity
values per share of Keith common stock based on the free cash
flow for the period consisting of fiscal years 2006, 2007 and
2008, with a terminal value based on an assumed perpetual growth
rate of Keiths free cash flow thereafter. Insofar as Keith
does not provide forecasted financial information, Bear Stearns
applied the discounted cash flow sensitivity analysis across
this period using a variety of assumed revenue growth rates and
operating margins based on Keiths historic and budgeted
revenue growth rates and operating margins and industry-average
revenue growth rates and operating margins. Bear Stearns also
used a range of discount rates corresponding to Keiths
estimated weighted average cost of capital during the period.
This estimated weighted average cost of capital was calculated
utilizing an unlevered beta of 0.91, the average unlevered beta
of the Public E&C Companies Peer Group.
84
Based on the foregoing, the equity values per share of Keith
common stock were estimated to be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-2008 Revenue Growth Rate | |
|
|
| |
2006-2008 Operating Margin(1),(2)
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0%
|
|
$ |
15.52 |
|
|
$ |
15.90 |
|
|
$ |
16.31 |
|
|
$ |
16.72 |
|
|
12.0%
|
|
$ |
17.42 |
|
|
$ |
17.90 |
|
|
$ |
18.41 |
|
|
$ |
18.93 |
|
|
14.0%
|
|
$ |
19.32 |
|
|
$ |
19.90 |
|
|
$ |
20.51 |
|
|
$ |
21.14 |
|
Perpetual Growth Rate(2),(3)
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.00%
|
|
$ |
16.96 |
|
|
$ |
17.42 |
|
|
$ |
17.90 |
|
|
$ |
18.39 |
|
|
3.25%
|
|
$ |
17.18 |
|
|
$ |
17.66 |
|
|
$ |
18.15 |
|
|
$ |
18.65 |
|
|
3.50%
|
|
$ |
17.42 |
|
|
$ |
17.90 |
|
|
$ |
18.41 |
|
|
$ |
18.93 |
|
|
3.75%
|
|
$ |
17.66 |
|
|
$ |
18.16 |
|
|
$ |
18.68 |
|
|
$ |
19.22 |
|
|
4.00%
|
|
$ |
17.92 |
|
|
$ |
18.44 |
|
|
$ |
18.97 |
|
|
$ |
19.52 |
|
Discount Rate(1),(3)
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.5%
|
|
$ |
16.36 |
|
|
$ |
16.78 |
|
|
$ |
17.23 |
|
|
$ |
17.69 |
|
|
14.0%
|
|
$ |
16.86 |
|
|
$ |
17.32 |
|
|
$ |
17.79 |
|
|
$ |
18.28 |
|
|
13.5%
|
|
$ |
17.42 |
|
|
$ |
17.90 |
|
|
$ |
18.41 |
|
|
$ |
18.93 |
|
|
13.0%
|
|
$ |
18.03 |
|
|
$ |
18.55 |
|
|
$ |
19.09 |
|
|
$ |
19.65 |
|
|
12.5%
|
|
$ |
18.72 |
|
|
$ |
19.28 |
|
|
$ |
19.85 |
|
|
$ |
20.45 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Assumes a perpetual growth rate of 3.5% |
|
(2) |
Assumes a discount rate of 13.5% |
|
(3) |
Assumes an operating margin of 12.0% |
|
|
|
Relative Contribution Analysis |
Bear Stearns calculated the implied equity splits based on the
relative contributions of Keith and Stantec to certain income
statement categories of the pro forma combined company,
including 2004 net income, analyst estimates for
2005 net income and equity value at market, in each case
before the effect of any synergies resulting from the merger.
Bear Stearns then compared these implied equity splits to the
proportion of the implied equity value that Keiths
shareholders would receive based on the merger consideration of
US$21.87 per share. For purposes of this analysis and
calculating Keiths pro forma ownership percentage, Bear
Stearns treated the cash portion of the merger consideration as
if it were Stantec common shares and observed that Keiths
ownership percentage of the pro forma combined equity value
(based on the total merger consideration and the treatment of
the cash portion of the merger consideration as if it were
common stock of Stantec) would be 29.0%. Bear Stearns noted that
Keiths pro forma ownership percentage would be greater
than Keiths implied equity split based on each of
2004 net income, analyst estimates for 2005 net income
and equity value at market of 25.9%, 24.1% and 23.9%,
respectively.
Bear Stearns also calculated the implied enterprise value splits
based on the relative contributions of Keith and Stantec to
certain income statement and balance sheet categories of the pro
forma combined company, including net revenues, gross profit,
EBITDA, operating income, total assets, total assets excluding
cash and enterprise value at market, in each case before the
effect of any synergies resulting from the merger. Bear Stearns
then compared these implied enterprise value splits to the
proportion of the implied enterprise value that Keiths
shareholders would receive based on the merger consideration of
US$21.87 per share. For purposes of this analysis and
calculating Keiths pro forma ownership percentage, Bear
Stearns treated the cash portion of the merger consideration as
if it were Stantec common shares and observed that Keiths
ownership percentage of the pro forma combined enterprise value
(based on the total merger consideration and the treatment of
the cash portion of the merger consideration as if it were
common stock of Stantec)
85
would be 23.4%. Bear Stearns noted Keiths pro forma
ownership percentage would be greater than Keiths implied
enterprise value split based on each of net revenues, gross
profit, total assets excluding cash and enterprise value at
market of 21.1%, 15.6%, 17.6% and 18.3%, respectively, and that
Keiths implied enterprise value split based on each of
EBITDA, operating income and total assets of 24.1%, 26.1% and
25.1%, respectively, would be greater than Keiths pro
forma ownership percentage.
|
|
|
Pro Forma Transaction Analysis |
Bear Stearns performed a pro forma transaction analysis to
determine the accretive/dilutive effect of the merger on the
earnings per share of Stantec common stock based on merger
consideration of US$21.87 per share. This pro forma
transaction analysis was performed on a cash basis, without
taking into account the amortization of intangibles resulting
from the merger, and was designed to illustrate the financial
impact of the merger on Keith shareholders and Stantec
shareholders alike by calculating the percentage change in the
anticipated earnings per share of Stantec common shares
following the issuance of Stantec common shares pursuant to the
merger. Bear Stearns conducted this analysis both under the
assumption that no synergies would result from the merger and
under the assumption that approximately US$4.9 million in
potential pre-tax synergies estimated by Keiths management
could result from the merger.
Based on its analysis, Bear Stearns determined that the merger
would result in immediate accretion to the earnings per Stantec
common share regardless of whether the potential pre-tax
synergies estimated by Keiths management were included in
the analysis. For instance, assuming that no synergies result
from the merger, the pro forma earnings per Stantec common share
will reflect accretion of 5.9% or $0.09 per share.
Likewise, assuming that the approximately US$4.9 million in
potential pre-tax synergies estimated by Keiths management
result from the merger, the pro forma earnings per Stantec
common share will reflect accretion of 15.5% or $0.22 per
Stantec common share.
* * *
In connection with rendering its opinion to Keiths board
of directors, Bear Stearns performed a variety of financial and
comparative valuation analyses, and did not rely on any single
analysis or factor described above, assign relative weights to
the analyses or factors considered by it, or make any conclusion
as to how the results of any given analysis, taken alone,
supported its opinion. The preparation of a fairness opinion is
a complex process that involves various determinations as to the
most relevant methods of financial analysis and the application
of these methods to the particular circumstances and is not
susceptible to a partial analysis or summary description. Bear
Stearns believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole
and that selection of portions of its analyses and of the
factors considered by it, without considering all the factors
and analyses in the aggregate, could create a different view of
the processes underlying its opinion. In addition, Bear Stearns
may have deemed various assumptions more or less probable than
other assumptions, so that the ranges of valuations resulting
from any particular analysis described above should not be taken
to be its view of the actual value of Keith.
The results of any analyses performed by Bear Stearns are not
necessarily indicative of future results or actual values, which
may be significantly more or less favorable than those suggested
by these analyses. Analyses relating to the value of companies
do not purport to be appraisals or valuations or to necessarily
reflect the price at which companies may actually be sold. No
company or transaction used in any analysis for purposes of
comparison is identical to Keith or the merger. Accordingly, an
analysis of the results of the comparisons is not mathematical;
rather it involves complex considerations and judgments about
differences in the companies and transactions to which Keith and
the merger were compared and other factors that could affect the
public trading values of the companies involved. The analyses
summarized above were prepared solely as a part of Bear
Stearns analysis of the fairness of the merger
consideration from a financial point of view to the holders of
shares of Keiths common stock and were provided to
Keiths board of directors in connection with the delivery
of Bear Stearns opinion. The analyses do not purport to be
appraisals of value or to reflect the prices at which
Keiths common stock or Stantecs common shares might
actually trade. In addition, as described above, Bear
Stearns opinion was one of the many factors taken into
consideration by
86
Keiths board of directors in making its determination to
approve the merger agreement. The merger consideration was
determined through negotiations between Keiths board of
directors and Stantec and was approved by and recommended by
Keiths board of directors.
Keith has agreed to pay Bear Stearns customary fees for its
financial advisory services in connection with the merger, a
substantial portion of which is contingent on successful
completion of the merger. Keith also has agreed to reimburse
Bear Stearns for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses,
including reasonable fees and out-of pocket expenses of legal
counsel, and to indemnify Bear Stearns and related parties
against liabilities, including liabilities under the federal
securities laws, arising out of its engagement. Bear
Stearns fee for its financial advisory services in
connection with the merger is expected to be approximately
US$4.4 million, plus expenses, based on a total transaction
value to Keith shareholders of approximately
US$206.6 million, assuming a per share transaction value of
approximately US$23.88. Bear Stearns fee is customary for
a transaction of this nature and was determined based on
arms length negotiations between Bear Stearns and Keith.
Except as described herein, Bear Stearns did not provide any
services to Keith or its affiliates during the preceding
two years.
Bear Stearns is an internationally recognized investment banking
and advisory firm and, as a customary part of its investment
banking business, is continuously engaged in the valuation of
businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and
acquisitions, spin-offs, split-offs and other corporate
restructurings, negotiated underwritings, competitive biddings,
secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities,
private placements, leveraged buyouts and valuations for
corporate, estate and other purposes. In the ordinary course of
its business, Bear Stearns and its affiliates may actively trade
the equity and debt securities and/or bank debt of Keith or
Stantec for its own account or for the account of its customers
and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position
in such securities or bank debt.
Reasons for Stantecs Board Recommendation
The Stantec board of directors believes that the merger is in
the best interests of Stantec and its shareholders. In approving
the merger and the merger agreement, the Stantec board of
directors considered a number of material factors, including the
factors described below. In view of the variety of factors
considered in connection with its evaluation of the merger, the
Stantec board did not find it practicable to, and did not
quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to the specific
factors considered in reaching its determination and
recommendation. In addition, individual directors may have given
differing weights to different factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the combination of Stantec and Keith will make up one of the
most diversified design firms in North America and represents a
significant step toward Stantecs goal to become a top 10
global design firm; |
|
|
|
Stantec and Keith are complementary in terms of services and
geography and have similar corporate cultures; |
|
|
|
the acquisition serves Stantecs objective of being a top
tier service provider in each market it serves; |
|
|
|
the combination of Stantecs and Keiths urban land
groups will create a leading service provider for the land
development market in North America, with a significant presence
in California, Nevada, Arizona, Alberta and Ontario, each a fast
growing region with strong land development markets; |
|
|
|
the addition of Keith will increase Stantecs
U.S. operations by about 70% and will provide a solid
foundation in California, one of the largest markets in North
America; |
|
|
|
Keiths strong presence in California will provide a
significant opportunity to cross-sell Stantecs public
sector services in transportation and environment market
segments and position Stantec for further growth in California; |
|
|
|
Keith has a history of profitability; and |
|
|
|
the acquisition of Keith is expected to be accretive to
Stantecs earnings. |
87
The foregoing discussion of the factors considered by the
Stantec board of directors is not intended to be exhaustive, but
includes the material factors considered by the Stantec board.
After weighing all of the different factors, the Stantec board
of directors unanimously approved the merger agreement.
Interests of Keiths and Stantecs Executive
Officers and Directors in the Merger
When you consider the Keith board of directors
recommendation to vote in favor of approval of the merger, you
should be aware that Keiths executive officers and
directors may have interests in the merger that may be different
from, or in addition to, the interests of the other Keith
shareholders. Keiths board of directors was aware that
these interests existed when it approved and declared advisable
the merger agreement and determined that the merger agreement
and the merger are fair to, and in the best interests of,
Keiths public shareholders.
Stockholders Support Agreement. Aram H. Keith, the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Keith and Keiths
largest beneficial shareholder, has granted a proxy to Stantec
to vote his Keith common stock in favor of the merger. See
Other Agreements Stockholders Support
Agreement.
Letter Agreement. Mr. Keith has also entered into a
letter agreement with Stantec pursuant to which, upon the
satisfaction of certain conditions, he will become Vice Chairman
of Stantec following the consummation of the merger. In
addition, upon satisfaction of certain conditions, which
includes the payment to Mr. Keith of US$525,000,
Mr. Keiths change in control agreement with Keith
will terminate at the effective time of the merger. See
Other Agreements Letter Agreement.
Change in Control Agreements. Mr. Keith as well as
Eric C. Nielsen, Keiths President and Chief Operating
Officer, and Gary C. Campanaro, Keiths Chief
Financial Officer, Secretary and a director of Keith are each a
party to a change in control agreement with Keith, which provide
for severance payments to these executive officers in certain
circumstances following a change in control of Keith. The change
in control agreements provide certain benefits to the named
officers if the executive officers employment with Keith
terminates as a result of an involuntary or constructive
termination (as these terms are defined in the agreements) at
any time within two years following a change in control. The
merger will constitute a change in control under the
change in control agreements. Pursuant to the agreements, each
executive officer is entitled to receive a one-time payment,
equal to two times his highest annual level of total cash
compensation (including any and all bonus amounts) paid by Keith
to him during any one of the three consecutive calendar years
(inclusive of the year of termination) immediately prior to
termination. The level of annual cash compensation for the year
in which a termination occurs will include any bonus amounts
that the executive officer is eligible to receive during the
year of termination, whether or not the bonus was earned by him.
In addition, any unvested options previously granted to the
executive officer will immediately vest and become exercisable
as of the date of exercise until their respective expiration
date. Furthermore, if the executive officers employment
with Keith terminates as a result of an involuntary or
constructive termination at any time within two years following
a change in control, any unvested restricted shares granted to
these executive officers become immediately vested. Under these
change in control agreements, for a two-year period following
the termination, the executive officer is also entitled to
receive continuing health coverage at a level commensurate to
the coverage provided by Keith to the executive officer
immediately prior to the change in control; all other benefits
under welfare benefit plans, practices, policies and programs
provided or offered by Keith, including medical, dental,
prescription, disability, employee life, group life, accidental
death and travel accident insurance plans and programs; fringe
benefits, including, without limitation, tax and financial
planning services, payment of club dues and an automobile
allowance; and a reasonable level of outplacement services
selected by the executive officer. Under the change in control
agreements, the executive officer also is entitled to receive a
payment by Keith to offset any excise tax under the excess
parachute payment provisions of Section 4999 of the Code
that has been levied against the executive officer for payments
that Keith has made to, or for the benefit of, that executive
officer (whether or not those payments are made pursuant to the
executive officers change in control agreement). The
payment by Keith will be grossed up so that after the executive
officer pays all taxes (including any interest or penalties with
respect to those taxes) on the payment, the executive officer
will receive an additional payment equal to the excise tax
imposed.
88
Mr. Keith has entered into a letter agreement with Stantec
pursuant to which, upon the satisfaction of certain conditions,
which include the payment of US$525,000 as described under
Letter Agreement above,
Mr. Keiths change in control agreement will terminate
at the effective time of the merger. Mr. Campanaro and
Keith have entered into a separation agreement, pursuant to
which, upon consummation of the merger, Mr. Campanaro will
be entitled to receive a payment of US$1.9 million, plus a
gross up for excise taxes, the payment of certain expenses
and the vesting of his unvested options and restricted Keith
common stock in full settlement of Keiths obligations
under Mr. Campanaros change in control agreement with
Keith. Mr. Nielsens employment is expected to
continue following the closing of the merger. If his employment
were to terminate following the closing of the merger, under
certain conditions requiring a severance payment, he would be
entitled to a severance payment, based on his 2005 salary and
his 2004 bonus, of approximately $900,000, plus ancillary
benefits.
Vested Stock Options. Upon closing of the merger, each
vested option to acquire shares of Keith common stock pursuant
to Keiths Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Incentive Plan,
including those held by an executive officer or director, will
be cancelled with no further rights. Prior to closing, holders
of vested options to acquire Keith common stock, including
executive officers and directors, may exercise their options by
paying the exercise price in cash or, if permitted by Keith,
surrendering a portion of their options in lieu of cash.
Messrs. Keith, Nielsen and Campanaro, as well as Thomas
Braun, President of Real Estate Development of Keith, and Dean
Palumbo, President of Energy/ Industrial Services of Keith, hold
vested options to purchase Keith common stock. Assuming
consideration equal to US$23.88 per vested option, less the
aggregate exercise price of such vested options, officers and
directors will receive the following as a result of the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger Consideration, | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Weighted Average | |
|
Net of Aggregate | |
Name |
|
Vested Options | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Aram H. Keith
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
US$ |
10.96 |
|
|
US$ |
1,033,840 |
|
Eric C. Nielsen
|
|
|
75,556 |
|
|
US$ |
10.23 |
|
|
US$ |
1,031,554 |
|
Gary C. Campanaro
|
|
|
83,982 |
|
|
US$ |
9.14 |
|
|
US$ |
1,237,867 |
|
Thomas Braun
|
|
|
27,740 |
|
|
US$ |
6.55 |
|
|
US$ |
480,781 |
|
Dean Palumbo
|
|
|
13,470 |
|
|
US$ |
9.61 |
|
|
US$ |
192,277 |
|
Other board members(1)
|
|
|
23,814 |
|
|
US$ |
9.78 |
|
|
US$ |
335,722 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes Christine Iger, Edward Muller and George Deukmejian |
Unvested Stock Options. Upon closing of the merger, each
unvested option to acquire shares of Keith common stock pursuant
to Keiths Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Incentive Plan,
including those held by an executive officer or director, will
be cancelled with no further rights. Prior to closing, Keith
will offer to purchase all unvested options to acquire Keith
common stock, including those held by an executive officer or
director, subject to the closing of the merger, at a price equal
to US$16.50 in cash plus the cash value of 0.23 Stantec common
shares, based on the 20-day average trading price prior to the
merger, less the exercise price of such option. In addition,
agreements with Messrs. Keith, Nielsen and Campanaro
provide for the vesting of all unvested options held by them at
the effective time of the merger. Messrs. Braun, Palumbo
and Robert Ohlund, President of Public Works/Infrastructure
Services, also hold unvested options to purchase Keith common
stock. Assuming consideration equal to US$23.88 per unvested
option, less the aggregate
89
exercise price of such unvested options, officers and directors
will receive the following as a result of the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Value, Net of Aggregate | |
Name |
|
Unvested Options | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Aram H. Keith
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
445,440 |
|
Eric C. Nielsen
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
356,220 |
|
Gary C. Campanaro
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
356,220 |
|
Thomas Braun
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
62,325 |
|
Dean Palumbo
|
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
|
66,812 |
|
Robert Ohlund
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
63,800 |
|
Other board members(1)
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
30,210 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes Christine Iger, Edward Muller and George Deukmejian |
Unvested Restricted Stock. Upon closing of the merger,
each share of unvested Keith restricted common stock that
remains subject to forfeiture and other restrictions under
Keiths Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Incentive Plan,
including shares held by an executive officer or director, will
be substituted with 0.23 Stantec common shares per share of
Keith common stock plus a variable amount of Stantec common
shares equal to US$16.50 per share of Keith common stock,
based on the 20-day average trading price of Stantec common
shares. The Stantec common shares substituted for the unvested
Keith restricted shares will be subject to similar restrictions
to that which the unvested Keith restricted stock are currently
subject. Messrs. Nielsen and Campanaro own shares of
unvested Keith restricted stock that will vest upon closing of
the merger, which will result in such shares being converted
into a right to receive the merger consideration. Assuming
consideration equal to US$23.88 per share of restricted common
stock, Messrs. Nielsen and Campanaro will receive the
following as a result of the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares of | |
|
Value of | |
|
|
Unvested Keith | |
|
Merger | |
Name |
|
Restricted Stock | |
|
Consideration | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Eric C. Nielsen
|
|
|
10,834 |
|
|
US$ |
258,716 |
|
Gary C. Campanaro
|
|
|
10,834 |
|
|
US$ |
258,716 |
|
Messrs. Braun and Palumbo hold shares of unvested
restricted common stock, which will be converted into shares of
unvested Stantec restricted common shares in connection with the
merger. Based on the closing sale price of Stantec common shares
and the U.S. dollar-Canadian dollar exchange rate as of
August 15, 2005, Messrs. Braun and Palumbo will
receive the following number of unvested restricted Stantec
common shares as a result of the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares of | |
|
Number of | |
|
|
Unvested Keith | |
|
Unvested Restricted | |
|
|
Restricted Common | |
|
Stantec Common Shares | |
Name |
|
Stock | |
|
Received | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Thomas Braun
|
|
|
10,334 |
|
|
|
7,647 |
|
Dean Palumbo
|
|
|
8,167 |
|
|
|
6,043 |
|
Representation on Stantecs Board of Directors. The
Stantec directors immediately prior to the merger will remain
directors immediately following consummation of the merger. The
merger agreement provides that Stantec shall cause Aram H.
Keith, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Keith, to be
appointed to the Stantec board of directors following
consummation of the merger.
Officers of Stantec. The existing officers of Stantec
will remain in such positions as described under
Management of Stantec immediately following
consummation of the merger. In addition, the letter agreement
entered into between Stantec and Mr. Keith provides,
subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, that
Mr. Keith will become Vice Chairman of Stantec following
consummation of the merger.
90
Representation on the Surviving Corporations Board of
Directors. The merger agreement provides that the directors
of Stantec Consulting will remain as the directors of the
surviving corporation immediately following the merger. The
directors of Stantec Consulting are Anthony P. Franceschini
and Jeffrey S. Lloyd. Upon consummation of the merger, the
current members of the board of directors of Keith will no
longer be directors of Keith or the surviving corporation.
Officers of the Surviving Corporation. The merger
agreement provides that the current officers of Stantec
Consulting will remain officers of the surviving corporation
immediately following the merger. The officers of Stantec
Consulting are Anthony P. Franceschini, Donald
W. Wilson and Michael Slocombe. Upon consummation of the
merger, the current officers of Keith will no longer be officers
of Keith or the surviving corporation.
Stantecs Directors and Executive Officers. For a
list of the current directors and executive officers of Stantec
see Management of Stantec. Following the merger,
these directors and executive officers will remain the directors
and executive officers of Stantec and Stantec will appoint Aram
H. Keith as a director.
Indemnification and Insurance. The merger agreement
provides that the bylaws of the surviving corporation will
contain provisions no less favorable than the current provisions
in Keiths bylaws with respect to the indemnification of
present and former officers and directors of Keith. The merger
agreement also provides that Stantec will maintain in effect for
six years the directors and officers liability
insurance maintained by Keith at the effective time of the
merger (provided that Stantec may substitute policies that are
materially no less favorable) with respect to matters that
occurred prior to the effective time of the merger and that
Stantec will not be required to expend more than an amount per
year equal to 175% of current annual premiums paid by Keith for
such insurance.
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger
In the opinion of Shearman & Sterling LLP, counsel
to Stantec, and Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &
Feld LLP, counsel to Keith, the material U.S. federal
income tax consequences of the merger to U.S. Holders, as
defined below, of Keith common stock who will exchange their
Keith common stock for Stantec common shares, a combination of
Stantec common shares and cash, or solely cash in the merger,
and of the ownership and disposition of the Stantec common
shares, if any, received by such U.S. Holders will be as
follows. This discussion is based on provisions of the Code,
Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, and administrative
and judicial interpretations thereof, all as in effect as of the
date hereof and all of which are subject to change, possibly
with retroactive effect.
This discussion applies only to holders of Keith common stock
and holders of Stantec common shares who received such stock in
the merger who are U.S. Holders. For purposes of this
discussion, a U.S. Holder is:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States
for U.S. federal income tax purposes; |
|
|
|
a corporation, or any entity treated as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized
under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the
District of Columbia; |
|
|
|
an estate that is subject to U.S. federal income tax
regardless of its source; or |
|
|
|
a trust if (1) a U.S. court is able to exercise
primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one
or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust, or (2) the trust has a
valid election in effect to be treated as a U.S. person for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. |
If a partnership holds Keith common stock, the U.S. federal
income tax treatment of a partner in the partnership will depend
on the status of the partner and the activities of the
partnership. Partners of partnerships that hold Keith common
stock should consult their tax advisors regarding the
U.S. federal income tax consequences to them of the merger.
This discussion is not a comprehensive description of all the
tax consequences that may be relevant to holders of Keith common
stock. It applies only to holders of Keith common stock that
hold their Keith common stock, and will hold the Stantec common
shares that they receive in the merger, as capital assets
91
within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code. No attempt
has been made to address all aspects of U.S. federal income
taxation that may be relevant to a particular holder of Keith
common stock in light of its particular circumstances or to
holders of Keith common stock subject to special treatment under
the U.S. federal income tax laws, including:
|
|
|
|
|
banks, insurance companies and financial institutions; |
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations; |
|
|
|
mutual funds; |
|
|
|
persons that have a functional currency other than the
U.S. dollar; |
|
|
|
traders in securities who elect to apply a mark-to-market method
of accounting; |
|
|
|
dealers in securities or foreign currency; |
|
|
|
holders of Keith common stock who acquired their Keith common
stock in connection with Keiths stock option plans or in
other compensatory transactions; |
|
|
|
holders of Keith common stock who hold their common stock as
part of a hedge, straddle, constructive sale, conversion
transaction or other integrated investment; |
|
|
|
Except to the extent discussed below, U.S. Holders of Keith
common stock who will hold 5% or more of either the total voting
power or the total value of the outstanding stock of Stantec
after the merger, determined after taking into account ownership
under the applicable attribution rules of the Code and Treasury
regulations (referred to in this proxy statement/ prospectus as
5% transferee shareholders); and |
|
|
|
holders who will hold 10% or more of Stantec equity either
directly, indirectly through one or more entities, or as a
result of certain constructive ownership rules of the Code,
following the merger; |
In addition, this discussion does not address any alternative
minimum tax, U.S. federal estate and gift tax, or any
state, local or foreign tax consequences of the merger. No
assurance can be given that the Internal Revenue Service (the
IRS) would not assert, or that a court would not
sustain, a position contrary to any of the tax consequences set
forth below. In addition, neither Stantec nor Keith will request
advance rulings from the IRS dealing with the tax consequences
of the merger.
EACH HOLDER OF KEITH COMMON STOCK SHOULD CONSULT THEIR TAX
ADVISOR WITH RESPECT TO THE PARTICULAR TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE
MERGER TO SUCH HOLDER.
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the merger has been
structured to qualify as a reorganization under the provisions
of Section 368(a) of the Code. It is a condition to the
closing that Stantec and Keith shall have each received opinions
to such effect from Shearman & Sterling LLP and Akin
Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, respectively, which
opinions shall not have been withdrawn or modified in any
material respect. These opinions rely upon certain factual
representations made by Stantec and Keith as of the date of this
registration statement. The issuance of such opinions is
conditioned upon the receipt by each of Shearman &
Sterling LLP and Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP of
certain additional factual representations to be made by Stantec
and Keith, which representations shall be dated on or before the
date of such opinions and shall not have been withdrawn or
modified in any material respects. Such opinions will neither
bind the IRS nor preclude the IRS from adopting a contrary
position.
We have been advised by counsel that whether the reorganization
qualifies as a tax-free reorganization, and whether counsel is
able to provide the above referenced opinion, depends, in part,
upon the market price of Stantec common shares. Applicable tax
rules require that in order for the merger to qualify as a
reorganization under the provisions of Section 368(a) of
the Code, a significant percentage of the consideration received
by the holders of Keith common stock must be in the form of
Stantec common shares. Because a portion of the merger
consideration consists of a fixed amount of Stantec common
shares, it is not possible to determine whether this threshold
is met prior to the effective time of the merger. It is
possible, therefore, that counsel may not be able to render such
opinions if the value of the Stantec common shares
92
drops significantly. In such case, Stantec and Keith will
recirculate a revised proxy statement/ prospectus and resolicit
the vote of Keith shareholders to approve the merger. Stantec,
Keith and their counsel are not aware of any other reason why
such tax opinions cannot be given.
Pursuant to the merger agreement, if Stantec or Keith receives
written notice from its counsel to the effect that such counsel
is unlikely to be able to deliver the tax opinion described in
the preceding paragraph, Stantec shall have the right, at its
sole and absolute discretion, to effect a reverse-subsidiary
merger so that Stantec Consulting will merge with and into
Keith, such that the separate corporate existence of Stantec
Consulting will cease and Keith shall continue as a subsidiary
of Stantec, which is referred to as the reverse-subsidiary
merger. The reverse-subsidiary merger would not be intended to
constitute a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, and its potential tax
consequences are described separately below under
The Reverse-Subsidiary Merger. If the
merger does not qualify as a tax-free reorganization and Stantec
does not exercise its option to effect a reverse-subsidiary
merger, Keith will not be obligated to consummate the merger.
Stantec and Keith will not consummate the merger under such
circumstances without recirculating a revised proxy statement/
prospectus and resoliciting the vote of Keith shareholders to
approve the merger.
The U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger to a
particular U.S. Holder of Keith common stock will depend on
the form of consideration received by the U.S. Holder in
exchange for its Keith common stock. In general, provided that
the merger qualifies as a reorganization under the provisions of
Section 368(a) of the Code, and subject to the assumptions
and qualifications set forth herein, the U.S. federal
income tax consequences of the merger are summarized below.
Exchange of Keith Common Stock Solely for Stantec Common
Shares. A U.S. Holder who exchanges Keith common stock
solely for Stantec common shares will not recognize any gain or
loss on the exchange except to the extent the U.S. Holder
receives cash in lieu of fractional Stantec common shares (as
discussed below). In the case of a 5% transferee shareholder who
exchanges Keith common stock solely for Stantec common shares,
this treatment will apply provided that the 5% transferee
shareholder enters into a gain recognition agreement in
accordance with applicable Treasury regulations. In addition,
such 5% transferee shareholders will be required to file certain
annual information statements with their income tax returns for
each of the first five full taxable years following the taxable
year of the merger. Such 5% transferee shareholders should
consult their tax advisors as to the U.S. federal income
tax consequences of the merger to them. The aggregate adjusted
tax basis of the Stantec common shares received by a
U.S. Holder of Keith common stock (including fractional
Stantec common shares deemed received and redeemed as described
below) will equal the U.S. Holders aggregate adjusted
tax basis in the Keith common stock surrendered in the merger.
The holding period of the Stantec common shares received
pursuant to the merger (including fractional Stantec common
shares deemed received and redeemed as described below) will
include the holding period of the Keith common stock surrendered
in the merger.
Exchange of Keith Common Stock for Cash and Stantec Common
Shares. If a U.S. Holder exchanges Keith common stock
for a combination of Stantec common shares and cash and the
U.S. Holders adjusted tax basis in the Keith common
stock surrendered in the merger is less than the sum of the fair
market value, as of the date of the merger, of the Stantec
common shares and the amount of cash received by the
U.S. Holder, the U.S. Holder will recognize gain equal
to the lesser of:
|
|
|
|
|
the sum of the amount of cash and the fair market value, as of
the date of the merger, of the Stantec common shares received by
the U.S. Holder, minus the adjusted tax basis of the Keith
common stock surrendered in exchange therefor, or |
|
|
|
the amount of cash received by the U.S. Holder in the
merger (excluding cash received in lieu of fractional Stantec
common shares, which is discussed below). |
In the case of a 5% transferee shareholder who exchanges Keith
common stock for a combination of Stantec common shares and
cash, this treatment will apply provided that the 5% transferee
shareholder enters into a gain recognition agreement in
accordance with applicable Treasury regulations. In addition,
such 5% transferee shareholders will be required to file certain
annual information statements with their income tax
93
returns for each of the first five full taxable years following
the taxable year of the merger. Such 5% transferee shareholders
should consult their tax advisors as to the U.S. federal
income tax consequences of the merger to them. If a
U.S. Holders adjusted tax basis in the Keith common
stock surrendered in the merger is greater than the sum of the
amount of cash and the fair market value of the Stantec common
shares received in the merger, the U.S. Holder will realize
a loss that is not currently allowed or recognized for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. U.S. Holders of
Keith common stock who bought shares of Keith common stock at
different prices, or otherwise own shares with unequal bases,
must make the above calculations separately for each share of
Keith common stock surrendered in the merger, taking into
account the U.S. Holders adjusted tax basis in each
share and a pro rata portion of the aggregate consideration
received by the U.S. Holder. A loss realized on one share
of Keith common stock may not be used to offset a gain realized
on another share of Keith common stock.
Any gain that a U.S. Holder recognizes will be long-term
capital gain if the U.S. Holders holding period with
respect to the Keith common stock surrendered is more than one
year as of the date of the merger. Long-term capital gains of
non-corporate U.S. Holders, including individuals, are
eligible for reduced rates of taxation. If, however, the cash
received has the effect of the distribution of a dividend, the
gain will be treated as dividend to the extent of the
U.S. Holders ratable share of earnings and profits,
as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes. For
purposes of determining whether the receipt of cash by the
U.S. Holder has the effect of a distribution of a dividend,
a U.S. Holder of Keith common stock will be treated as if
the U.S. Holder first exchanged all of its Keith common
stock solely for Stantec common shares and then had a portion of
such stock immediately redeemed by Stantec for the cash that
such U.S. Holder actually received pursuant to the merger.
The IRS has indicated in rulings that any reduction in the
interest of a minority shareholder that owns a small number of
shares in a publicly and widely held corporation and that
exercises no control over corporate affairs would receive
capital gain rather than dividend treatment. In determining the
amount of reduction in interest, certain constructive ownership
rules are taken into account. Because the determination of
whether a payment will be treated as having the effect of a
distribution of a dividend will depend on the facts and
circumstances specific to each U.S. Holder of Keith common
stock, U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors
regarding the tax treatment of cash received in the merger.
In the case of a U.S. Holder of Keith common stock who
receives cash and Stantec common shares in the merger, such
U.S. Holders aggregate basis in the Stantec common
shares received (including fractional Stantec common shares
deemed received and redeemed as described below) will equal the
exchanging U.S. Holders aggregate adjusted tax basis
in the Keith common stock surrendered in the merger, increased
by any gain recognized as a result of the merger (including any
portion of the gain that is treated as a dividend as described
above but excluding any gain or loss from the deemed receipt and
redemption of fractional shares) and reduced by the amount of
cash received in the merger (excluding any cash received with
respect to a fractional share of Stantec common shares deemed
received and redeemed). The holding period of the Stantec common
shares received (including fractional Stantec common shares
deemed received and redeemed as described below) will include
the holding period of the Keith common stock surrendered in the
merger.
Exchange of Keith Common Stock Solely for Cash. A
U.S. Holder of Keith common stock who exchanges Keith
common stock solely for cash in the merger will recognize gain
or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount
of cash received in the merger and the U.S. Holders
adjusted tax basis in the Keith common stock surrendered in the
merger. The gain or loss recognized by the U.S. Holder will
be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holders
holding period for the Keith common stock surrendered is more
than one year as of the date of the merger. Long-term capital
gains of non-corporate U.S. Holders, including individuals,
are eligible for reduced rates of taxation. The deductibility of
capital losses is subject to limitations.
Vested Stock Options. Upon closing of the merger, each
vested option to acquire shares of Keith common stock under
Keiths Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Incentive Plan will
be cancelled with no further rights. Prior to closing, holders
of vested options to acquire Keith common stock may exercise
their options by paying the exercise price in cash. Keith
anticipates that it also may offer optionholders the opportunity
to exercise their options by surrendering a portion of their
stock options in lieu of cash. Neither
94
the Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Incentive Plan or the forms
of Option Agreements used for awards under the Plan specifically
permit the exercise of options by surrendering a portion of the
options in lieu of cash. The addition of this exercise
alternative in connection with the merger transaction may be
considered a modification of the outstanding nonqualified stock
options and, to the extent any such offer is accepted, incentive
stock options.
Under new U.S. tax rules governing nonqualified deferred
compensation (Section 409A of the Code, effective
January 1, 2005), the modification of an outstanding stock
option may be treated as the grant of a new option. Preliminary
IRS guidance interpreting Section 409A provides that the
grant of a stock option at less than fair market value may be
treated as nonqualified deferred compensation subject to the
requirements of Section 409A. Section 409A provides
certain requirements governing the timing of distributions that
the modified options may not satisfy. Failure to satisfy the
Section 409A distribution requirements with respect to
nonqualified deferred compensation will result in immediate
taxation, the potential imposition of interest on any late
payment of tax and the imposition of an additional 20% tax over
and above the regular ordinary income tax amount. However, the
preliminary IRS guidance interpreting Section 409A provides
that short-term deferrals, where the amount is received by the
service provider by the later of
21/2 months
after the end of either the optionees or Keiths
first taxable year in which the amount is no longer subject to a
substantial risk of forfeiture, will not be considered
nonqualified deferred compensation. Although the proposed
modification will occur at a time when the exercise price of the
option is less than the fair market value of the underlying
Keith common stock, the modification should not cause the
options to be treated as nonqualified deferred compensation
where the merger consideration is paid within
21/2 months
of the end of the taxable year in which the option is modified,
although this conclusion is not entirely clear. Incentive stock
options that are modified at a time when the exercise price is
less than the fair market value of the underlying Keith stock
will be treated as nonqualified stock options.
U.S. optionholders will recognize ordinary income on
exercise of nonqualified stock options in an amount equal to the
excess of the fair market value of Keith common stock received
upon exercise over the exercise price paid, referred to in this
proxy statement/ prospectus as the spread. To the extent
nonqualified options are exercised by surrendering a portion of
the options in lieu of cash, the surrendered options will be
taxed as if they were exercised for cash.
U.S. optionholders who hold incentive stock options will
not recognize ordinary income on exercise, but the option spread
is an adjustment item for alternative minimum tax purposes. To
the extent incentive stock option shares are disposed of within
two years of the initial option grant date or one year of option
exercise, referred to in this proxy statement/ prospectus as
statutory holding periods, the optionee generally will have a
disqualifying disposition. Upon a disqualifying
disposition, the optionee will recognize ordinary income equal
to the lesser of (1) the spread on the date of exercise of
the disposed shares, and (2) the gain realized on the
disqualifying disposition (reflecting basis adjustments as a
result of the merger). For these purposes, the receipt of merger
consideration, including any cash in lieu of Stantec common
stock, should not constitute a disqualifying disposition,
although this conclusion is not entirely clear. With respect to
shares previously acquired upon option exercise, including
incentive stock option shares, the general tax consequences of
the merger discussed herein should apply. Thus, (1) any
cash merger consideration should be taxed as either short-term
or long-term capital gain, depending on the holding period of
the shares acquired by the exercise of options; and (2) any
subsequent disposition of Stantec common stock received as
merger consideration in connection with incentive stock option
shares will be taxed as a disqualifying disposition if such
shares are disposed of prior to the end of the statutory holding
periods.
Unvested Stock Options. Upon closing of the merger, each
unvested option to acquire shares of Keith common stock under
Keiths Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Incentive Plan will
be cancelled with no further rights. Prior to closing, Keith
will offer to purchase all unvested options to acquire Keith
common stock, subject to the closing of the merger, at a price
equal to US$16.50 plus the cash value of 0.23 Stantec common
shares, based on the 20-day average trading price prior to the
merger, less the exercise price of such option. For
U.S. tax purposes, an optionee recognizes as ordinary
income the amount paid by Keith to purchase the optionees
unvested options to acquire Keith common stock.
95
Unvested Restricted Stock. Upon closing of the merger,
each share of unvested Keith restricted common stock that
remains subject to forfeiture and other restrictions under
Keiths Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Incentive Plan will
be substituted with 0.23 Stantec common shares per share of
Keith common stock plus a variable amount of Stantec common
shares equal to US$16.50 per share of Keith common stock,
based on the 20-day average trading price of Stantec common
shares. The Stantec common shares substituted for the unvested
Keith restricted stock will be subject to similar restrictions
to that which the unvested Keith restricted stock are currently
subject. If the holder of Keith restricted common stock filed a
valid Section 83(b) election with the IRS within thirty
days of purchasing the shares, the tax consequences to the
holder generally will be the same as that of Keith shareholders
as discussed below. If the holder did not file a valid
Section 83(b) election, the merger is of no consequence and
the U.S. tax implications are unchanged. This means that
the holder will recognize ordinary income on each vesting day
equal to the fair market value of the Stantec common shares that
vest, and any subsequent gain on later disposition will be
short-term or long-term capital gain, depending upon the period
of time the shares are held after they vest.
Cash Received in Lieu of Fractional Shares. A
U.S. Holder of Keith common stock who receives cash in lieu
of a fractional share of Stantec common shares will be treated
as if the U.S. Holder first received such fractional share
in the merger and then as having received cash in redemption of
the fractional share. Thus, such a U.S. Holder will
recognize gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference
between the amount of cash received in lieu of the fractional
share and the portion of the U.S. Holders aggregate
adjusted tax basis in its Keith common stock surrendered that is
allocable to the fractional share.
Cash Received Pursuant to the Exercise of Dissenters
Rights. A U.S. Holder of Keith common stock who
receives cash for all of its Keith common stock pursuant to the
exercise of dissenters rights in connection with the
merger will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference
between the tax basis of the Keith common stock surrendered and
the amount of cash received. Gain or loss will be capital gain
or loss and any such capital gain or loss will be long-term
capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holders holding
period for the Keith common stock surrendered is more than one
year as of the date of the disposition.
Reporting Requirements and Backup Withholding. Each
U.S. Holder of Keith common stock that receives Stantec
common shares in the merger will be required to file a statement
with its U.S. federal income tax return providing its basis
in the Keith common stock surrendered and the fair market value
of the Stantec common shares and any cash received in the
merger, and to retain permanent records of this information
relating to the merger. Five percent transferee shareholders who
intend to enter into gain recognition agreements in accordance
with applicable Treasury regulations must file such agreements
with their U.S. federal income tax returns for the year of
the merger, and will be required to file certain annual
information statements with their income tax returns for each of
the first five full taxable years following the taxable year of
the merger. Such 5% transferee shareholders should consult their
tax advisors regarding the requirements applicable to them.
Backup withholding may apply to the amount of cash, if any,
received by a U.S. Holder of Keith common stock in the
merger, including cash received in lieu of fractional shares,
unless the U.S. Holder is an exempt recipient, such as a
corporation. Backup withholding at a rate of 28% will apply to
those payments if a U.S. Holder fails to provide a taxpayer
identification number and fails to comply with certain
certification procedures or otherwise fails to establish an
exemption from backup withholding. Any amount withheld under the
backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund or credit
against a U.S. Holders U.S. federal income tax
liability, provided the required information is furnished to the
IRS in a timely manner.
Under Section 6043A of the Code, Stantec or Keith may be
required, under regulations and forms to be promulgated by the
U.S. Treasury Department and the IRS to report certain
information to the IRS and to Keith shareholders regarding the
merger, the consideration and the shareholders receiving
non-stock consideration. Under Section 1.368-3 of the
Treasury regulations, Stantec and Keith will be required to
report certain information about the merger with their
U.S. federal income tax returns for the taxable year of the
merger.
96
|
|
|
The Reverse-Subsidiary Merger |
In the event that Stantec exercises its right to effect the
reverse-subsidiary merger, the merger would not be intended to
constitute a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code. As such, a U.S. Holder of
Keith common stock that exchanges Keith common stock solely for
cash in the reverse-subsidiary merger generally will recognize
gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the
amount of cash received and the U.S. Holders adjusted
tax basis in the Keith common stock surrendered in the
reverse-subsidiary merger. The gain or loss recognized by a
U.S. Holder will be long-term capital gain or loss if the
U.S. Holders holding period for the Keith common
stock surrendered is more than one year as of the date of the
reverse-subsidiary merger. Long-term capital gains of
non-corporate taxpayers, including individuals, generally are
eligible for reduced rates of taxation. The deductibility of
capital losses is subject to limitations. In the event that
Stantec exercises this option, Keith and Stantec will
recirculate a revised proxy statement/prospectus and resolicit
the vote of Keith shareholders to approve the merger.
|
|
|
Ownership of Stantec Common Shares |
Distributions on Stantec Common Shares. Subject to the
passive foreign investment company (PFIC) rules
discussed below, distributions with respect to Stantec common
shares (before reduction for Canadian withholding taxes) paid
out of Stantecs current or accumulated earnings and
profits, as determined for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, will be dividends and will be includable in the
U.S. Holders income when received. Subject to certain
limitations, dividends paid to non-corporate U.S. Holders,
including individuals, may be eligible for a reduced rate of
taxation if Stantec is deemed to be a qualified foreign
corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes and
certain holding requirements are met. A qualified foreign
corporation includes a foreign corporation that is eligible for
the benefits of an income tax treaty with the United States and
that includes an exchange of information provision that the
U.S. Treasury Department has determined to be satisfactory
for purposes of the qualified dividend provisions of the Code,
but does not include an otherwise qualified foreign corporation
that is a PFIC. The U.S. Treasury Department issued a
notice determining that the Convention is satisfactory for such
purposes. In addition, a foreign corporation is treated as a
qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends received
from that corporation on shares that are readily tradable on an
established securities market in the United States. There are
substantial requirements that must be met for dividends paid to
non-corporate U.S. Holders to be taxed at the reduced rate,
including additional requirements applicable to foreign
corporations. Non-corporate U.S. Holders of Stantec common
shares should consult their tax advisors regarding the
application of these requirements given their particular
circumstances. Stantec believes that it is eligible for the
benefits of the Convention, and that Stantec will continue to be
a qualified foreign corporation for so long as it is not a PFIC
and it continues to be eligible for benefits of the Convention.
Dividends on Stantec common shares will not be eligible for the
dividends-received deduction generally allowed to
U.S. corporations.
The amount of any dividend paid in Canadian dollars will equal
the U.S. dollar value of the Canadian dollars received
calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the
date the dividend is received by a U.S. Holder regardless
of whether the Canadian dollars are converted into
U.S. dollars. If the Canadian dollars received as a
dividend are not converted into U.S. dollars at the date of
receipt, a U.S. Holder will have a basis in the Canadian
dollars equal to the U.S. dollar value on the date of
receipt. Any gain or loss realized on a subsequent conversion or
other disposition of the Canadian dollars will be treated as
ordinary income or loss, and generally will be income or loss
from sources within the United States for U.S. foreign tax
credit purposes.
A U.S. Holder may be entitled to claim a U.S. foreign
tax credit for, or deduct, Canadian taxes that are withheld on
dividends received by the U.S. Holder, subject to
applicable limitations in the Code. Dividends will be income
from sources outside the United States, and for tax years
beginning before January 1, 2007, will be passive
income or, in the case of certain U.S. Holders,
financial services income, and for tax years
beginning after December 31, 2006, will be passive
category income or general category income for
purposes of computing the U.S. foreign tax credit allowable
to a U.S. Holder. The rules governing the U.S. foreign
tax credit are complex, and U.S. Holders are urged to
consult their tax advisors regarding the availability of the
U.S. foreign tax credit under their particular
circumstances.
97
To the extent that the amount of any distribution exceeds
Stantecs current or accumulated earnings and profits for a
taxable year, the distribution will first be treated as a
tax-free return of capital to the extent of a
U.S. Holders basis, and any excess will be treated as
capital gain. Such an excess distribution would not give rise to
income from sources outside the United States.
Disposition of Stantec Common Shares. For
U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. Holder will
recognize taxable gain or loss on any sale or other disposition
of Stantec common shares in an amount equal to the difference
between the U.S. dollar value of the amount realized for
the Stantec common shares and the U.S. Holders tax
basis (determined in U.S. dollars) in the Stantec common
shares. Such gain or loss will be a capital gain or loss and
will be long-term capital gain or loss if the
U.S. Holders holding period for the Stantec common
shares is more than one year as of the date of disposition.
Long-term capital gains of non-corporate taxpayers, including
individuals, are eligible for reduced rates of taxation. The
deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations. Such
gain or loss will be income or loss from sources within the
United States for U.S. foreign tax credit limitation
purposes.
Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules. Stantec does
not believe that it was, for its most recently ended taxable
year, or will be classified as for its current taxable year, for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, a PFIC, but this
conclusion is a factual determination that is made annually and
thus may be subject to change. If Stantec were to be treated as
a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder held
Stantec common shares, unless the U.S. Holder elected to be
taxed annually on a mark-to-market basis with respect to the
Stantec common shares, gain realized on the sale or other
disposition of the Stantec common shares would in general not be
treated as capital gain. Instead, a U.S. Holder would be
treated as if the shareholder had realized such gain and certain
excess distributions ratably over the
U.S. Holders holding period for the common shares and
would be taxed at the highest tax rate in effect for each such
year to which the gain was allocated, together with a special
interest charge in respect of the tax attributable to each such
year. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors
with respect to how the PFIC rules could affect their tax
situation.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding. Backup
withholding will apply to dividends on Stantec common shares and
the proceeds of the sale or other disposition of Stantec common
shares unless a U.S. Holder is an exempt recipient, such as
a corporation. Backup withholding at a rate of 28% will apply to
those payments if a U.S. Holder fails to provide a taxpayer
identification number and fails to comply with certain
certification procedures or otherwise fails to establish an
exemption from backup withholding. Any amount withheld under the
backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund or credit
against a shareholders U.S. federal income tax
liability, provided the required information is furnished to the
IRS in a timely manner.
Material Canadian Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger
The following discussion is a summary of the material Canadian
federal income tax considerations under the Income Tax Act
(Canada) (referred to in this proxy statement/ prospectus as the
Canadian Tax Act) of the conversion of Keith common stock into
Stantec common shares (and cash in lieu of a fractional Stantec
common share) in the merger and the ownership of Stantec common
shares received pursuant to the merger, generally applicable to
holders of Keith common stock who, for purposes of the Canadian
Tax Act and at all relevant times, are not and are not deemed to
be resident in Canada, hold Keith common stock and will hold
Stantec common shares as capital property, deal at arms
length with Stantec and Keith and who do not use or hold and are
not deemed to use or hold the Keith common stock or the Stantec
common shares in connection with carrying on business in Canada
and for whom neither the Keith common stock nor the Stantec
common shares are designated insurance property
(referred to in this proxy statement/ prospectus as non-resident
holders). This discussion does not apply to a non-resident
insurer that carries on business in Canada and elsewhere.
This summary is based upon the current provisions of the
Canadian Tax Act, the regulations under the Canadian Tax Act,
all specific proposals to amend the Canadian Tax Act and the
regulations publicly announced by the Minister of Finance prior
to the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus and the current
98
published administrative and assessing practices of the Canada
Revenue Agency. This summary does not otherwise take into
account or anticipate any change in law, whether by legislative,
governmental or judicial action, nor does it take into account
or consider any provincial, territorial or foreign income tax
legislation or considerations.
This summary is of a general nature only and is not intended to
be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice to
holders of Keith common stock. Accordingly, holders of Keith
common stock should consult their own tax advisors with respect
to their particular circumstances.
|
|
|
Conversion of Keith Common Stock |
The conversion of the Keith common stock into Stantec common
shares (and cash in lieu of a fractional common share of
Stantec) pursuant to the merger will not give rise to tax for a
non-resident holder under the Canadian Tax Act.
|
|
|
Dividends on Stantec Common Shares |
Dividends paid or credited (or deemed to have been paid or
credited) on the Stantec common shares to a non-resident holder
will be subject to non-resident withholding tax under the
Canadian Tax Act of 25% of the gross amount of those dividends
(subject to reduction in accordance with an applicable
international tax treaty between Canada and the Non-resident
holders country of residence). Where the non-resident
holder is a resident of the United States for purposes of the
Convention, the rate of this withholding tax is generally
reduced to 15%. Under the Convention, dividends paid to certain
religious, scientific, literary, educational or charitable
organizations and certain pension organizations that are
resident in, and generally exempt from taxation by, the United
States, are generally exempt from Canadian non-resident
withholding tax. Provided that certain administrative procedures
are observed by such an organization, Stantec would not be
required to withhold tax from dividends paid or credited to the
organization.
|
|
|
Disposition of Stantec Common Shares |
A non-resident holder will not be subject to tax under the
Canadian Tax Act in respect of any capital gain realized by that
non-resident holder on a disposition of a Stantec common share,
unless the Stantec common share constitutes taxable
Canadian property of the non-resident holder for purposes
of the Canadian Tax Act and the non-resident holder is not
entitled to relief under an applicable tax treaty. Provided
that, at the time of disposition, the Stantec common shares are
listed on a prescribed stock exchange (which includes the
Toronto Stock Exchange, the New York Stock Exchange and the
Nasdaq National Market), the Stantec common shares will
generally not constitute taxable Canadian property to a
non-resident holder unless, at any time during the 60-month
period immediately preceding the disposition of the Stantec
common shares, the holder, persons with whom the holder does not
deal at arms length or the holder together with those
persons, owns not less than 25% of the issued shares of any
class or any series of shares of Stantec.
Even if the Stantec common shares are taxable Canadian property
to a non-resident holder, the Convention will generally exempt a
non-resident holder who is a resident of the United States for
purposes of the Convention from tax under the Canadian Tax Act
on any capital gain arising on the disposition of a Stantec
common share unless the value of the shares of Stantec at the
time of disposition is derived principally from real property
situated in Canada.
Anticipated Accounting Treatment
It is expected that the merger will be accounted for as a
purchase by Stantec of Keith under Canadian and U.S. GAAP.
Under the purchase method of accounting, the assets and
liabilities of the acquired company are, as of completion of the
merger, recorded at their respective fair values and added to
those of the reporting public issuer, including an amount for
goodwill representing the difference between the purchase price
and the fair value of the identifiable net assets. Financial
statements of Stantec issued after consummation of the merger
will only reflect the operations of Keith after the merger and
will not be restated retroactively to reflect the historical
financial position or results of operations of Keith.
99
All unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
information contained in this proxy statement/ prospectus has
been prepared using the purchase method to account for the
merger. The allocation of the purchase price will be determined
after the merger is completed and after completion of an
analysis to determine the assigned fair values of Keiths
tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities. In
addition, estimates related to restructuring and merger-related
charges are subject to final decisions related to combining
Stantec and Keith. Accordingly, the final purchase accounting
adjustments and restructuring and merger-related charges may be
materially different from the unaudited pro forma adjustments
and changes presented in this proxy statement/ prospectus. Any
decrease in the net fair value of the assets and liabilities of
Keith as compared to the unaudited pro forma information
included in this proxy statement/ prospectus will have the
effect of increasing the amount of the purchase price allocable
to goodwill.
Regulatory Matters Related to the Merger
Under the HSR Act, acquisitions of a sufficient size may not be
consummated unless notification has been given and information
has been furnished to the Antitrust Division of the
U.S. Department of Justice and to the Federal Trade
Commission and applicable waiting period requirements have been
satisfied or early termination of the waiting period has been
granted. The consummation of the merger is subject to the
expiration or early termination of the waiting period under the
HSR Act.
In addition, appropriate authorities of any U.S. state or
appropriate U.S. federal authorities could take actions
under state or U.S. federal antitrust laws seeking to stop
completion of the merger, if found appropriate, and in certain
circumstances, third parties could seek relief under
U.S. or state antitrust laws.
Other than the filings described above, neither Stantec nor
Keith is aware of any government or regulatory approvals to be
obtained, or waiting periods to expire, to complete the merger.
If the parties discover that other approvals or waiting periods
are necessary, they will seek to obtain or comply with them. If
any additional approval or action is needed, however, there is
no assurance that Stantec and Keith will be able to obtain it or
any of the other necessary approvals. Even if Stantec or Keith
could obtain an approval and the merger agreement is adopted by
the Keith shareholders, conditions may be placed on it that
could cause Stantec to abandon the merger if permitted by the
terms of the merger agreement.
Merger Fees, Costs and Expenses
All expenses incurred in connection with the merger agreement
and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement will
be paid by the party incurring those expenses, except that
Stantec and Keith have agreed to share equally the fees, costs
and expenses related to preparing, printing and mailing
Stantecs registration statement on Form F-4 and this
proxy statement/ prospectus and the filing fees incurred
pursuant to the requirements of the HSR Act. The parties have
also agreed that Keith will pay certain other specified costs.
See The Merger Agreement Covenants and
Agreements Fees and Expenses.
Dissenters Rights
Dissenters rights will be available to the shareholders of
Keith under the circumstances described below. Shareholders of
Keith who dissent from the merger in accordance with the
procedures set forth in Chapter 13 of the CCC will be
entitled to receive an amount equal to the fair market value of
their shares as of April 14, 2005, the last day before the
public announcement of the merger.
To perfect their statutory dissenters rights, Keith
shareholders must vote against the merger and must follow the
required procedures set forth in Chapter 13 of the CCC, a
copy of which is attached hereto as Appendix D to this
proxy statement/ prospectus.
The following summary contains the material provisions of the
law pertaining to dissenters rights as provided under
Chapter 13 of the CCC and is qualified in its entirety by
Appendix D to this proxy statement/ prospectus. Any Keith
shareholder contemplating the exercise of dissenters
rights should carefully review the provisions of Chapter 13
of the CCC set forth in Appendix D to this proxy statement/
prospectus. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS
OF CHAPTER 13 WILL RESULT IN A WAIVER OF A KEITH
SHAREHOLDERS DISSENTERS RIGHTS.
100
In order to be entitled to exercise dissenters rights,
Keith shareholders must vote AGAINST the approval of
the merger proposal. Thus, if Keith shareholders wish to dissent
and they submit the proxy, they must specify that their shares
are to be voted AGAINST the approval of the merger
proposal. If a Keith shareholder submits a proxy without voting
instructions or with instructions to vote FOR the
approval of the merger proposal, their shares will automatically
be voted in favor of the merger proposal and they will lose any
dissenters rights. If a Keith shareholder does not submit
a proxy and he or she attends the special meeting, he or she
must vote AGAINST the approval of the merger
proposal at the meeting to preserve their dissenters
rights. Further, if a Keith shareholder abstains from voting his
or her shares, the shareholder will lose his or her
dissenters rights.
Under Section 1300(b)(1) of the CCC, no shares of Keith
common stock will be deemed to be dissenting shares unless
demands for payment are filed with respect to 5% or more of the
outstanding shares of Keith common stock. In addition,
Stantecs obligation to consummate the merger is subject to
the condition that the number of dissenting shares is less than
5% of the outstanding shares of Keith common stock.
In order to preserve their dissenters rights, Keith
shareholders must also make a written demand to Keith for the
purchase of their shares of Keith common stock and for the
payment to them in cash of the fair market value of the shares.
The demand must:
|
|
|
|
|
state the number of shares of Keith common stock the dissenting
shareholder holds of record; |
|
|
|
contain a statement of what the dissenting shareholder claims to
be the fair market value of the shares as of April 14,
2005, the last trading day before the announcement of the
merger, without giving effect to any appreciation or
depreciation due to the merger; and |
|
|
|
be received by Keith no later than the date of the special
meeting to vote on the merger. |
The statement of fair market value contained in the demand
constitutes an offer by the Keith shareholder to sell his or her
shares to Keith at that price. Once a Keith shareholder has made
the demand, he or she may not withdraw it, unless Keith consents
to the withdrawal. A proxy or vote against the approval of the
merger proposal does not in and of itself constitute a demand.
If the merger proposal is approved at the special meeting,
within ten days, Keith will mail a notice of approval of the
merger proposal to each dissenting shareholder. This notice of
approval will contain:
|
|
|
|
|
a statement of the price determined by the Keith board of
directors to represent the fair market value of the shares; |
|
|
|
a brief description of the procedure that the shareholder must
follow, if the shareholder desires to exercise dissenters
rights; and |
|
|
|
a copy of sections 1300, 1301, 1302, 1303 and 1304 of
Chapter 13 of the CCC (which sets out the procedures that
must be followed to perfect a shareholders
dissenters rights). |
This notice of approval will constitute an offer by Keith to
purchase the dissenting shares, assuming the merger is completed.
Within thirty days after the date on which Keith mailed this
notice of approval, a Keith shareholder wishing to dissent must
submit his or her share certificates to Keith or its transfer
agent to be endorsed as dissenting shares. The certificates will
be stamped or endorsed with a statement that they are dissenting
shares. IF A KEITH SHAREHOLDER WISHING TO DISSENT TRANSFERS HIS
OR HER DISSENTING SHARES PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THEM FOR THIS
REQUIRED ENDORSEMENT, THE SHARES WILL LOSE THEIR STATUS AS
DISSENTING SHARES.
If the dissenting shareholder and Keith (or Stantec, if the
merger has been completed) agree that shares are dissenting
shares and agree on the fair market value of the shares, upon
surrender of the dissenting shareholders endorsed
certificates, Keith will make payment of that amount on the
later of thirty days after an agreement has been reached on the
fair market value, or thirty days after any statutory or
contractual conditions to the merger agreement have been
satisfied. Any agreement between dissenting Keith shareholders
and Keith (or after the merger, Stantec) fixing a fair market
value of any dissenting shares must be filed with the secretary
or clerk of Keith.
101
If Keith (or after the merger, Stantec) denies that the shares
submitted by the dissenting shareholder qualify as dissenting
shares, or if the dissenting shareholder and Keith (or after the
merger, Stantec) fail to agree on the fair market value of those
shares, either the dissenting shareholder or Keith (or after the
merger, Stantec) may file a complaint in the superior court of
the proper county in California requesting that the court
determine the issue. The complaint must be filed within six
months after the date on which notice of the approval of the
merger proposal is mailed to the dissenting shareholders. The
dissenting shareholder may join as a plaintiff in a suit filed
by another dissenting shareholder and may also be joined as a
defendant in any action brought by Keith (or after the merger,
Stantec). If the suit is not brought within six months, the
shares of the dissenting shareholder will lose their status as
dissenting shares.
In a dissenters rights action, the court must first
determine if the shares qualify as dissenting shares. If the
court determines that the shares qualify as dissenting shares,
it will either determine the fair market value or appoint one or
more impartial appraisers to do so. The court will assess and
apportion the costs of the action as it considers equitable.
However, if the appraised value of the shares exceeds the price
offered by the corporation by more than 25%, the corporation
must pay the costs of the suit, which may include (at the
courts discretion), attorneys fees, expert witness
fees, and prejudgment interest.
A shareholder who receives a cash payment for dissenting shares
will be treated as if those shares were redeemed for federal
income tax purposes.
Stock Exchange Listing
Stantec is obligated under the merger agreement to use its best
efforts to cause the Stantec common shares issued in connection
with the merger, to be approved for listing on the New York
Stock Exchange and the Toronto Stock Exchange. In addition, it
is a condition to the closing of the merger that these shares be
approved for listing on the New York Stock Exchange and the
Toronto Stock Exchange, in each case subject to customary
conditions and official notice of issuance. Stantec common
shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange and Stantec has
received conditional approval to list the common shares to be
issued in connection with the merger on the Toronto Stock
Exchange. A listing remains subject, however, to Stantec
fulfilling all of the listing requirements of the Toronto Stock
Exchange. The Keith common stock will be delisted from the
Nasdaq National Market following consummation of the merger.
Resale of Stantec Common Shares
U.S. Resale Requirements. The Stantec common shares
issued in the merger will not be subject to any restrictions on
transfer arising under the Securities Act, except for shares
issued to any Keith shareholder who may be deemed to be an
affiliate of Stantec or Keith for purposes of
Rule 144 or Rule 145 under the Securities Act. Each
affiliate has entered into an agreement with Keith providing
that the affiliate will not transfer any Stantec common shares
received in the merger except in compliance with the Securities
Act.
Canadian Resale Requirements. Assuming Stantec is in
compliance with its reporting and disclosure obligations under
applicable Canadian securities legislation and the rules of the
Toronto Stock Exchange, and except in the case of control
persons, insiders (as those terms are defined
in the Securities Act (Ontario) and equivalent
legislation in other Canadian jurisdictions) and persons
possessing material undisclosed information relating to Stantec
or its securities, the Stantec common shares issued pursuant to
the merger agreement will not be subject to any substantial
restrictions on transfer under applicable Canadian securities
legislation.
102
The Merger Agreement
The following is a summary of selected provisions of the
merger agreement. While Keith and Stantec believe this
description covers the material terms of the merger agreement,
it may not contain all the information that is important to you,
and it is qualified in its entirety by reference to the merger
agreement, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety
and attached to this proxy statement/ prospectus as
Appendix A. We urge you to read the merger agreement in its
entirety. In the event of any discrepancy between the terms of
the merger agreement and the following summary, the merger
agreement will control.
Structure of the Merger
If the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Keith
common stock, referred to as Keith common stock, approve the
merger agreement and all other conditions to the merger are
satisfied or waived, Keith will be merged with and into Stantec
Consulting. After the merger, Stantec Consulting will be the
surviving corporation.
The merger is intended to qualify as a reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.
Effective Time and Closing of the Merger
The merger will become effective when the merger agreement and
the certificate of merger are filed with the California
Secretary of State. Immediately prior to such filing, referred
to as the effective time, a closing will be held at the offices
of Keith, or such other place as the parties agree, for the
purpose of confirming the satisfaction or waiver of the closing
conditions set forth in the merger agreement.
Surviving Corporation Governing Documents, Officers and
Directors
Surviving Corporation Governing Documents. The articles
of incorporation of Stantec Consulting, as in effect immediately
prior to the merger, will be the articles of incorporation of
the surviving corporation. The bylaws of Stantec Consulting, as
in effect immediately prior to the merger, will be the bylaws of
the surviving corporation until amended.
Surviving Corporation Officers and Directors. The
directors and officers of Stantec Consulting immediately prior
to the merger will be the initial directors and officers of the
surviving corporation.
Merger Consideration
Conversion of Keith Common Stock. The merger agreement
provides that at the effective time, each share of Keith common
stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective
time, referred to as the Keith Shares (other than any Keith
Shares to be cancelled in the manner described below and any
dissenting Keith Shares), will be cancelled and automatically
converted into the right to receive the equivalent of:
|
|
|
(i) US$11.00 cash, 0.23 Stantec common shares,
referred to as the fixed ratio stock, and that number of Stantec
common shares equal to US$5.50 divided by the 20-day average
trading price of Stantec common shares on the Toronto Stock
Exchange; or |
|
|
(ii) the fixed ratio stock, and that number of Stantec
common shares equal to US$16.50 divided by the
average 20-day trading price of Stantec common shares on
the Toronto Stock Exchange; or |
|
|
(iii) cash equal to the sum of (A) US$16.50 and
(B) the product of 0.23 and the average 20-day trading
price of Stantec common shares, referred to as the cash payment. |
The 20-day average Stantec trading price will be calculated
based upon the simple average of the daily weighted average
sales price of Stantec common shares on the Toronto Stock
Exchange as reported by Bloomberg L.P. for each of the 20
consecutive trading days ending on and including the second
trading day prior to the effective date of the merger. The
weighted average sales price for each trading day will be
converted from Canadian dollars to U.S. dollars at the
inverse of the noon buying rate quoted by the Federal
103
Reserve Bank of New York. Based on the closing sale price of
Stantec common shares and the U.S. dollar-Canadian dollar
exchange rate as of August 15, 2005, 0.23 Stantec
common shares had a value of approximately US$7.38 and US$5.50
equaled approximately 0.17 Stantec common shares.
Holders of Keith common stock will have the right to elect to
receive their merger consideration in the form of (A) a
mixture of cash and Stantec common shares, as described above in
clause (i), (B) all Stantec common shares, as
described in clause (ii) above or (C) all cash, as
described in clause (iii) above, subject in the case of
(B) and (C) to pro rata adjustment if the amount of
Stantec common shares or cash is oversubscribed. Based on the
closing sale price of Stantec common shares and the
U.S. dollar-Canadian dollar exchange rate as of
August 15, 2005, for each share of Keith common stock a
holder who elects to receive (A) a mix of cash and Stantec
common shares will receive US$11.00 and approximately
0.40 Stantec common shares, (B) all Stantec common
shares will receive approximately 0.74 Stantec common
shares and (C) all cash will receive approximately
US$23.88, subject to pro rata adjustment in the case of (B)
and (C).
Reverse-Subsidiary Merger. If, for some reason, the
merger would not qualify as a tax-free reorganization under the
provisions of Section 368(a) of the Code, Stantec has the
option, at its sole discretion, to effect the merger by merging
Stantec Consulting with and into Keith, with Keith as the
surviving corporation, provided that, instead of paying the
merger consideration described above, Stantec would pay cash
merger consideration of US$22.00 per share of Keith common
stock.
Fractional Shares. Stantec will not issue fractional
Stantec common shares in the merger. Instead, each holder of a
fractional share interest will be paid cash in an amount equal
to the product obtained by multiplying (1) such fractional
share interest, by (2) the average 20-day trading
price of Stantec common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange
calculated in the manner described above.
Stock Options. At the effective time, all options to
purchase Keith common stock, referred to as Keith stock options,
will be cancelled with no further rights. Prior to the effective
time, Keith will offer to purchase all unvested stock options
and will deposit with the exchange agent, for the benefit of
holders of unvested options, cash equal to the cash payment less
the exercise price of the unvested options. Keiths offer
to purchase will be conditioned upon the approval of the merger
agreement by Keiths shareholders and the satisfaction or
waiver of all of the conditions under the merger agreement.
Restricted Stock. Certain unvested restricted stock of
Keith will be substituted with fixed ratio stock and that number
of Stantec common shares equal to US$16.50 divided by the
average 20-day trading price of Stantec common shares on
the Toronto Stock Exchange. Such Stantec common shares will be
subject to the same restrictions, including vesting conditions,
as such Keith restricted stock.
Representations and Warranties
The merger agreement contains representations and warranties
made by Keith to Stantec and Stantec Consulting relating to a
number of matters, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
incorporation, valid existence and qualification to do business
of Keith and each of its subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
corporate authorization and validity of the merger agreement and
the inapplicability of takeover statutes to the merger; |
|
|
|
capitalization of Keith; |
|
|
|
the absence of any conflict of the merger agreement with
Keiths articles of incorporation or bylaws, with
applicable laws or with any material agreement to which Keith or
any of its subsidiaries is a party and, subject to certain
exceptions set forth in the merger agreement, the absence of
governmental consents, filings and approvals necessary to
complete the merger; |
|
|
|
the approval by Keiths board of directors of the merger
agreement and the recommendation of the merger agreement by
Keiths board of directors to Keiths shareholders and
the vote required by the shareholders of Keith to complete the
merger; |
|
|
|
the proper filing of documents with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, referred to as the SEC; |
104
|
|
|
|
|
the general accuracy of financial statements and the absence of
undisclosed liabilities; |
|
|
|
accounts receivable, accounts payable, work in progress, accrued
project liabilities and revenue recognition; |
|
|
|
the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting; |
|
|
|
the receipt of the opinion of the financial advisor as to the
fairness, from a financial point of view, of the merger
consideration to Keiths shareholders; |
|
|
|
the absence of material changes or events in the business of
Keith since December 31, 2004; |
|
|
|
the absence of material pending or threatened litigation
outstanding against Keith or any of its subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
employee benefit plans; |
|
|
|
labor and employment matters; |
|
|
|
title to leased real property and to assets; |
|
|
|
ownership and validity of intellectual property rights; |
|
|
|
tax matters and the payment of taxes; |
|
|
|
various environmental matters, including compliance with
environmental laws; |
|
|
|
validity and effect of, and absence of defaults under, material
contracts; |
|
|
|
adequacy of insurance; |
|
|
|
customers and suppliers; |
|
|
|
interested party transactions; and |
|
|
|
brokers and finders fees related to the merger. |
The merger agreement also contains representations and
warranties by Stantec and Stantec Consulting to Keith relating
to a number of matters, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
incorporation, valid existence and qualification to do business
of Stantec and Stantec Consulting; |
|
|
|
corporate authorization and validity of the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
Stantecs capitalization; |
|
|
|
the absence of any conflict of the merger agreement with
Stantecs or Stantec Consultings articles of
incorporation or bylaws, with applicable laws or with any
agreement to which Stantec or Stantec Consulting is a party and,
subject to certain exceptions set forth in the merger agreement,
the absence of governmental consents, filings and approvals
necessary to complete the merger; |
|
|
|
Stantecs and Stantec Consultings possession of all
permits and regulatory approvals required to conduct its
business, and compliance by Stantec and Stantec Consulting with
all applicable foreign, federal, state and local laws; |
|
|
|
the proper filing of documents with the Alberta Securities
Commission; |
|
|
|
the general accuracy of financial statements and the absence of
undisclosed liabilities; |
|
|
|
accounts receivable, accounts payable, work in progress, accrued
project liabilities and revenue recognition; |
|
|
|
the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting; |
|
|
|
the absence of material pending or threatened litigation
outstanding against Stantec or Stantec Consulting; |
105
|
|
|
|
|
approval of the merger agreement by the sole shareholder of
Stantec Consulting and the absence of any requisite vote of
Stantecs shareholders to consummate the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
Stantec Consultings operations; |
|
|
|
tax matters; |
|
|
|
approval of the merger and the merger agreement by the board of
directors of each of Stantec and Stantec Consulting and approval
by the board of directors of Stantec of the registration and
listing of Stantec common shares to be issued in connection with
the merger; |
|
|
|
the absence of material changes or events in the business of
Stantec; |
|
|
|
absence of ownership of Keith shares by Stantec or any of its
subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
brokers and finders fees related to the merger; |
|
|
|
ownership and validity of intellectual property rights; and |
|
|
|
various environmental matters, including compliance with
environmental laws. |
Certain of Keiths and Stantecs representations and
warranties are qualified as to materiality or material
adverse effect. When used with respect to Keith, Stantec
or the surviving corporation, material adverse
effect means any material adverse change or effect on the
business, prospects, condition (financial or otherwise), assets,
liabilities or results of operations of that entity, taken as a
whole, or the ability of that entity and its subsidiaries to
consummate the merger, other than any change or effect relating
to:
|
|
|
|
|
general economic, political or regulatory conditions or
securities markets in general that do not have a
disproportionate effect on Keith or Stantec, as applicable; |
|
|
|
the industry in which Stantec and Keith operate that does not
have a disproportionate effect on Keith or Stantec, as
applicable; or |
|
|
|
the public announcement or consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement. |
Conduct of Business Pending the Merger
Conduct of Keiths Business Pending Merger. Keith
has agreed that until the termination of the merger agreement or
the effective time, except as expressly contemplated by the
merger agreement, it will not do any of the following without
the written consent of Stantec (which Stantec will not
unreasonably withhold or delay):
|
|
|
|
|
operate other than in the ordinary course of business and
consistent with past practice; |
|
|
|
change or amend its articles of incorporation or bylaws; |
|
|
|
(1) issue any shares of capital stock, or any options,
warrants, convertible securities or rights to acquire any shares
of such capital stock or any other ownership interest (except
for issuances of Keith common stock issuable pursuant to
Keiths stock awards outstanding on the date of the merger
agreement) or (2) sell, pledge, dispose of, grant or
encumber any material assets of Keith or any subsidiary; |
|
|
|
split, combine or reclassify any of its capital stock or
purchase or otherwise acquire any of its capital stock (other
than in connection with the cashless exercise of Keith stock
options outstanding on the date of the merger agreement); |
|
|
|
declare, set aside, make or pay any dividend or other
distribution, payable in cash, stock, property or otherwise,
with respect to any of its capital stock, except for dividends
by any direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary to Keith or
any other wholly-owned subsidiary; |
106
|
|
|
|
|
hire any additional employees other than in the ordinary course
of business or increase the compensation payable or to become
payable or the benefits provided to its directors, officers or
employees, except for increases in the ordinary course of
business in salaries or wages of employees of Keith or any
subsidiary who are not directors or officers of Keith or any
subsidiary, or grant any severance or termination pay to, or
enter into any employment or severance agreement with, any
director, officer or other employee of Keith or of any
subsidiary, or establish or amend any arrangement for the
benefit of any current or former director, officer, employee or
consultant; |
|
|
|
(1) acquire any corporation or other business organization
or any material amount of assets; (2) incur any
indebtedness for borrowed money or issue any debt securities or
become responsible for the obligations of any person, or make
any loans or advances, or grant any security interest in any of
its assets except in the ordinary course of business and
consistent with past practice; (3) enter into any material
contract; (4) authorize certain capital expenditures; or
(5) enter into or amend any contract, agreement, commitment
or arrangement with respect to any matter set forth in this
paragraph; |
|
|
|
implement or adopt any change in its accounting principles,
practices or methods, other than as is consistent with or as may
be required by law, GAAP or regulatory guidelines; |
|
|
|
make any tax election or settle or compromise any material
United States federal, state, local or non-United States income
tax liability; |
|
|
|
discharge any obligation other than the discharge of liabilities
(1) reflected or reserved against on the consolidated
balance sheet of Keith and its subsidiaries as of March 31,
2005; (2) subsequently incurred in the ordinary course of
business and consistent with past practice, or
(3) subsequently incurred not in the ordinary course of
business which will not exceed US$100,000; |
|
|
|
amend or consent to the termination of any material contract, or
amend, waive, modify or consent to the termination of
Keiths or any subsidiarys rights thereunder; |
|
|
|
commence or settle any material litigation; or |
|
|
|
announce an intention, enter into any formal or informal
agreement or otherwise make a commitment, to do any of the
foregoing. |
Keith has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to preserve
substantially intact the business organization of Keith and its
subsidiaries, to keep available the services of the current
officers, key employees and key consultants of Keith and its
subsidiaries and to preserve the current advantageous
relationships of Keith and its subsidiaries with customers,
suppliers and other persons with which Keith or any subsidiary
has significant business relations.
Conduct of Stantecs Business Pending Merger. Except
as expressly contemplated by any provision of the merger
agreement, Stantec has agreed that until the termination of the
merger agreement or the effective time, Stantec will not,
without the prior written consent of Keith, engage in any action
that could reasonably be expected to cause the merger to fail to
qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, take any action to cause
Stantecs representations and warranties or agreements and
covenants required by the merger agreement to be untrue in any
material respect or take any action that would reasonably be
likely to materially delay the merger.
Additional Agreements
Registration Statement; Proxy Statement. Stantec and
Keith have agreed that as promptly as practicable after the
execution of the merger agreement they will prepare and file
with the SEC (1) the proxy statement to be sent to
Keiths shareholders relating to the meeting of
Keiths shareholders, referred to as the special meeting,
and (2) a registration statement on Form F-4 in
connection with the registration under the Securities Act of the
Stantec common shares to be issued pursuant to the merger.
Stantec and Keith have agreed to use their reasonable best
efforts to cause the registration statement to become effective
as promptly as practicable and to mail this proxy statement/
prospectus to Keiths shareholders.
107
Keith has also agreed that neither Keiths board of
directors nor any committee will withdraw or modify, or propose
to withdraw or modify, in a manner adverse to Stantec or Stantec
Consulting, its approval or recommendation of the merger
agreement and the merger unless the board of directors
determines in its good faith judgment and after consultation
with independent legal counsel that the failure to so withdraw
or modify its approval and recommendation of the merger
agreement and the merger would be inconsistent with its
fiduciary duties to Keith and its shareholders.
The parties have further agreed that at (1) the time the
registration statement is declared effective, (2) the time
this proxy statement/ prospectus is first mailed, (3) the
time of the special meeting and (4) the effective time, the
information such party provided for inclusion in this proxy
statement/ prospectus will not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or fail to state any material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements
therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading.
Shareholder Meeting. The merger agreement requires Keith
to call a meeting of its shareholders to approve the merger
agreement. Keith will use its reasonable best efforts to solicit
from its shareholders proxies in favor of approval and adoption
of the merger agreement. Keith, however, is not required to
encourage the adoption of the merger agreement or secure the
vote of shareholders if the board of directors of Keith
withdraws its recommendation. See Termination, Amendment
and Waiver Termination below.
Employee Benefit Matters. After the effective time,
Stantec will cause the surviving corporation and its
subsidiaries to honor all agreements of Keith and its
subsidiaries that are applicable to any current or former
employees or directors of Keith or any subsidiary. Stantec will
use reasonable best efforts to provide that employees of Keith
or any subsidiary receive credit under any employee benefit
plan, program or arrangement established or maintained by the
surviving corporation or any of its subsidiaries for service
accrued or deemed accrued prior to the effective time; provided,
however, that such crediting of service will not duplicate any
benefit or the funding of any such benefit. In addition, Stantec
will use reasonable best efforts to waive any limitations on
benefits relating to any pre-existing conditions to the same
extent such limitations are waived under any comparable plan of
Stantec or its subsidiaries and recognize, for purposes of
annual deductible and out-of-pocket limits under its medical and
dental plans, deductible and out-of-pocket expenses paid by
employees of Keith and its subsidiaries in the calendar year in
which the effective time occurs.
Indemnification and Directors and Officers
Insurance. The merger agreement provides that the bylaws of
the surviving corporation will contain provisions no less
favorable than the current provisions in Keiths bylaws
with respect to the indemnification of present and former
officers and directors of Keith. The merger agreement also
provides that Stantec will maintain in effect for six years the
directors and officers liability insurance
maintained by Keith at the effective time of the merger
(provided that Stantec may substitute policies that are
materially no less favorable) with respect to matters that
occurred prior to the effective time of the merger and that
Stantec will not be required to expend more than an amount per
year equal to 175% of current annual premiums paid by Keith for
such insurance.
Obligations of Stantec Consulting. Stantec has agreed to
take all action necessary to cause Stantec Consulting to perform
its obligations under the merger agreement and to consummate the
merger on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in
the merger agreement.
Consents of Accountants. Keith and Stantec have agreed to
use all reasonable efforts to deliver to each other consents
from their respective independent auditors with respect to the
inclusion of reports by such auditors in the registration
statement.
Listing. Stantec has agreed to promptly prepare and
submit to the New York Stock Exchange or the Nasdaq National
Market, referred to together as the U.S. exchange, and the
Toronto Stock Exchange, listing applications covering the
Stantec common shares to be issued in the merger and will use
its reasonable efforts to obtain, prior to the effective time,
approval for the listing. Stantecs common shares are now
listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Stantec has received
conditional approval to list such Stantec common shares on the
Toronto Stock Exchange.
108
Stantecs Board of Directors. Stantec has agreed to
take all such action as may be necessary to cause the chief
executive officer of Keith to be appointed to the board of
directors of Stantec.
No Solicitation of Transactions. Keith has agreed that
neither it nor any subsidiary nor any of the directors, officers
or employees of it or any subsidiary will, and that it will not
authorize its and its subsidiaries representatives, to
(1) facilitate any inquiries or the making of any proposal
or offer that constitutes, or may reasonably be expected to lead
to, any competing transaction, or (2) enter into or
maintain or continue discussions or negotiations with any person
or entity in furtherance of such inquiries or to obtain a
proposal or offer for a competing transaction, or (3) agree
to or recommend any competing transaction or enter into any
letter of intent or other agreement contemplating any competing
transaction; however, the board of directors of Keith may
furnish information to, and enter into discussions with, a
person who has made an unsolicited, written, bona fide proposal
or offer regarding a competing transaction, referred to as a
superior proposal, if the board of directors of Keith has
determined, in its good faith judgment, after having received
the advice of a financial advisor and after having consulted
with independent legal counsel, that the furnishing of such
information or entering into discussions is required to comply
with its fiduciary obligations to Keith and its shareholders. If
Keith receives a superior proposal that Keiths board of
directors has decided to recommend or pursue by terminating the
merger agreement, Keith will provide Stantec with three days to
match the superior proposal.
Plan of Reorganization. Each party has agreed to use its
reasonable best efforts to cause the merger to qualify as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code.
Keith Contribution. Prior to the effective time, at
Stantecs request, Keith will deposit with the exchange
agent for the benefit of the holders of Keith shares, the lesser
of (a) US$18,000,000 and (b) the maximum amount of
cash that would not preclude the merger from qualifying as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code.
Restricted Stock. Keith has agreed to cooperate to amend
agreements with each holder of Keiths unvested restricted
stock.
Conditions to the Merger
The respective obligations of Keith, Stantec and Stantec
Consulting to complete the merger are subject to the
satisfaction or waiver, where permissible, of certain conditions.
Conditions to Each Partys Obligation to Effect the
Merger. The obligations of Keith, Stantec and Stantec
Consulting to complete the merger are conditioned upon the
following conditions being satisfied or waived, where
permissible:
|
|
|
|
|
the registration statement having been declared effective under
the Securities Act and no stop order or proceeding seeking a
stop order being pending by or before the SEC; |
|
|
|
Keiths shareholders having affirmatively voted to approve
the merger agreement by the requisite vote; |
|
|
|
no order preventing the consummation of the merger being in
effect; |
|
|
|
any waiting period applicable to the consummation of the merger
under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of
1976, as amended, referred to as the HSR Act, having expired or
having been terminated, such waiting period having been
terminated effective May 20, 2005; and |
|
|
|
the Stantec common shares to be issued in the merger having been
authorized for listing on the Toronto Stock Exchange. Stantec
has received conditional approval to list such Stantec common
shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange. |
109
Conditions to Obligations of Stantec and Stantec
Consulting. The obligations of Stantec and Stantec
Consulting to consummate the merger depend upon the following
additional conditions being satisfied or waived, where
permissible:
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of Keith being true and
correct when made and as of the effective time; |
|
|
|
Keith having performed in all material respects all of its
obligations under the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
all consents, approvals and authorizations legally required to
be obtained to consummate the merger having been obtained from
all governmental authorities; |
|
|
|
no material adverse effect as defined in the merger agreement
having occurred with respect to Keith; |
|
|
|
Keith having deposited with the exchange agent for the benefit
of the holders of Keith shares the lesser of
(a) US$18,000,000 and (b) the maximum amount of cash
that would not preclude the merger from qualifying as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code; |
|
|
|
Keith having at least US$40,000,000 of cash or cash equivalents
on deposit (less the amount of cash deposited with the exchange
agent); |
|
|
|
the number of dissenting shares being less than 5% of the issued
and outstanding Keith shares; |
|
|
|
prior to the effective time, the termination and cancellation of
Keiths plan qualified under Section 401(k) of the
Code; however, the board of directors of Keith will not
terminate and cancel the 401(k) plan if Stantec provides written
notice to that effect to Keith at least two (2) days prior
to the effective time; and |
|
|
|
Stantec having received the opinion of Shearman &
Sterling LLP, counsel to Stantec, to the effect that, for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, the merger will qualify
as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of
the Code. |
Conditions to Obligations of Keith. The obligations of
Keith to consummate the merger depend on the following
additional conditions being satisfied or waived, where
permissible:
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of Stantec and Stantec
Consulting being true and correct when made and as of the
effective time; |
|
|
|
Stantec and Stantec Consulting having performed in all material
respects all of their obligations under the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
No material adverse effect as defined in the merger agreement
having occurred with respect to Stantec; |
|
|
|
Keith having received the opinion of Akin Gump Strauss
Hauer & Feld, counsel to Keith, to the effect that, for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, the merger will qualify
as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of
the Code; |
|
|
|
the Stantec common shares to be issued in the merger having been
authorized for listing or quotation on the U.S. exchange. |
110
Termination, Amendment and Waiver
Termination. The merger agreement may be terminated at
any time prior to the effective time by action taken or
authorized by the board of directors of the terminating party,
notwithstanding any requisite approval and adoption of the
merger agreement by the shareholders of Keith, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual written consent of Stantec and Keith; or |
|
|
|
by either Stantec or Keith if: |
|
|
|
|
|
the effective time has not occurred on or before
December 31, 2005; |
|
|
|
Keiths shareholders fail to approve and adopt the merger
agreement at the special meeting; or |
|
|
|
the other party breaches any representation, warranty, covenant
or agreement such that the terminating partys closing
conditions are not satisfied and the breach is either not
reasonably capable of being cured or has not been cured within
15 days after notice of the breach; |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Keiths board of directors withdraws, modifies or
changes in a manner adverse to Stantec its recommendation of the
approval and adoption of the merger agreement, (2) the
board of directors of Keith recommends to the shareholders of
Keith a competing transaction or enters into any letter of
intent or any agreement accepting any competing transaction,
(3) Keith fails to include in the proxy statement the
recommendation of Keiths board of directors in favor of
the approval and adoption of the merger agreement and the
merger, (4) the board of directors of Keith fails to
reaffirm its recommendation in favor of the approval and
adoption of the merger agreement and the approval of the merger
within five business days after Stantec requests in writing that
such recommendation be reaffirmed, (5) through the fault of
Keith, the merger is not, prior to December 15, 2005,
submitted for the approval of the holders of Keith common stock
at the special meeting, (6) Keith intentionally breaches
its obligations under Additional Agreements No
Solicitation of Transactions, or (7) a tender offer
or exchange offer for 15% or more of the outstanding shares of
capital stock of Keith is commenced, and Keiths board of
directors fails to recommend against acceptance of such tender
offer or exchange offer by its shareholders within 10 days
(each of the foregoing being referred to as a triggering event); |
|
|
|
|
|
by Keith in order to accept a superior proposal of a third party. |
Effect of Termination. If the merger agreement is
terminated as described above, the merger agreement will be
void, and there will be no liability or obligation of any party
except as to prior breaches of the merger agreement,
confidentiality, and fees and expenses (including brokers
and finders fees) described below.
Fees and Expenses. All expenses incurred in connection
with the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement will be paid by the party incurring such
expenses, whether or not the merger or any other transaction is
consummated, except that Keith and Stantec will each pay
one-half of all expenses relating to printing, filing and
mailing the registration statement and the proxy statement and
all SEC and other regulatory filing fees incurred in connection
with the registration statement and the proxy statement and the
filing fee for the forms filed under the HSR Act. Keith has
agreed that if Stantec terminates the merger agreement as a
result of a triggering event or if Keith terminates the merger
agreement in order to accept a superior proposal, then Keith
will pay to Stantec, no later than one business day after the
first of such events has occurred, a fee of US$3.0 million
plus Stantecs expenses.
General Provisions
Non-Survival of Representations and Warranties. The
representations, warranties and agreements in the merger
agreement and in any certificate delivered pursuant to the
merger agreement will terminate at the effective time, except
that the agreements set forth in Articles I, II, and
IX and Sections 6.03(b), 6.06, 6.10 and 8.03 of the merger
agreement will survive the effective time.
Governing Law. The merger agreement is governed by the
laws of the State of New York and the parties agree to submit to
the jurisdiction of any New York state or federal court.
111
Other Agreements
Stockholders Support Agreement
The following is a summary of all material provisions of the
Stockholders Support Agreement, dated as of April 14, 2005,
among Stantec, Stantec Consulting and the stockholders listed
below. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the Stockholders Support Agreement, a copy of which is attached
as Appendix B to this proxy statement/ prospectus.
In the stockholders support agreement, Aram H. Keith and
Margie R. Keith Revocable Trust, Aram H. Keith and
Margie R. Keith granted an irrevocable proxy to Stantec to vote
at any meeting of the shareholders of Keith all of such
stockholders shares of Keith: (1) in favor of the
approval and adoption of the merger agreement and approval of
the merger; (2) against any action, agreement or
transaction or proposal that would result in a breach of any
covenant, representation or warranty or any other obligation or
agreement of Keith under the merger agreement or that could
result in any of the conditions to Keiths obligations
under the merger agreement not being fulfilled; and
(3) in favor of any other matter necessary to the
consummation of the merger.
Each stockholder further agreed not to sell, dispose or
otherwise encumber its shares of Keith or take any action that
would make any representation or warranty in the stockholders
support agreement untrue or incorrect.
Subject to the fulfillment of fiduciary obligations, each
stockholder also agreed not to solicit, discuss or otherwise
facilitate any competing transaction or unsolicited proposal
that constitutes, or could lead to, a superior
proposal; however, nothing in the agreement prohibits Aram
H. Keith, in his capacity as director and executive officer
of Keith, from engaging in any activity permitted pursuant to
the merger agreement.
The stockholders obligations under the stockholders
support agreement will terminate when the merger becomes
effective or the merger agreement is terminated, whichever is
earlier.
As of March 31, 2005, the stockholders owned (either
beneficially or of record) 1,374,217 shares of Keith common
stock, constituting approximately 17.2% of the outstanding
shares of Keith common stock (or approximately 16.8% of the
outstanding shares of Keith common stock on a fully diluted
basis).
Letter Agreement
On April 14, 2005, Stantec and Aram H. Keith entered
into a letter agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the letter
agreement, Stantec agreed to cause Stantec Consulting to extend
to Mr. Keith a formal employment offer, which would
supercede all of Mr. Keiths existing employment
agreements, including the change in control letter agreement,
dated as of March 22, 2001. Upon the close of the merger,
the delivery of the formal employment offer and the payment of
US$525,000 by Stantec to Mr. Keith, the existing change in
control letter agreement will terminate.
Confidentiality Agreement
The following is a summary of all material provisions of the
confidentiality agreement, dated as of February 18, 2005,
between Keith and Stantec. Pursuant to the confidentiality
agreement, each of Keith and Stantec agreed, except as required
by law, to keep confidential and not to disclose or reveal any
confidential information of the other party to any person other
than certain of its representatives, and not to use such
confidential information for any purpose other than in
connection with the evaluation or consummation of the merger.
Confidential information does not include, however, information
which (1) is or becomes generally available to the public
(other than as a result of a wrongful disclosure), (2) was
already available to the party receiving such information on a
non-confidential basis, (3) becomes available to a party on
a non-confidential basis from a person who is not prohibited
from disclosing such information to such Party or (4) was
independently acquired by the party receiving such information
without violating its obligations under the confidentiality
agreement. If a party is required by law to disclose any
confidential information, such party must notify the party that
provided the information and, if the receiving party is unable
to obtain a protective order or waive compliance with the terms
of the confidentiality agreement, such receiving party may
disclose confidential information without liability provided
that it seeks to obtain confidential treatment of the
confidential information.
112
Beneficial Ownership of Securities
The following table sets forth information with respect to the
beneficial ownership of Stantec common shares, as of
March 21, 2005, by each director, each executive officer
and all directors and executive officers as a group.
Beneficial ownership is determined under rules issued by the
SEC. Under these rules, beneficial ownership includes any
Stantec common shares as to which the individual or entity has
sole or shared voting power or investment power and includes any
shares as to which the individual or entity has the right to
acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days through the
exercise of any warrant, option or other right. The inclusion in
this proxy statement/ prospectus of such Stantec common shares,
however, does not constitute an admission that the named
individual is a direct or indirect beneficial owner of such
Stantec common shares. Stantec common shares that a person has
the right to acquire within 60 days of March 21, 2005
are deemed outstanding for the purpose of calculating the
percentage ownership of such person, but are not deemed
outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage owned
by any other person listed. The applicable percentage of
beneficial ownership after the merger is based upon
18,937,019 Stantec common shares outstanding before the merger
as of April 13, 2005, as adjusted to reflect approximately
3,898,193 Stantec common shares to be issued pursuant to the
merger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before the Merger | |
|
After the Merger | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Percentage of | |
|
Number of | |
|
Percentage of | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Class | |
|
Shares | |
|
Class | |
|
|
Beneficially | |
|
Beneficially | |
|
Beneficially | |
|
Beneficially | |
Name of Beneficial Owner(1)(2) |
|
Owned | |
|
Owned | |
|
Owned | |
|
Owned | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Ronald Triffo
|
|
|
617,091 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
617,091 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
Anthony P. Franceschini
|
|
|
332,025 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
332,025 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Aram H. Keith(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
640,385 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
Neilson A. Dutch Bertholf, Jr.
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Robert J. Bradshaw
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
E. John (Jack) Finn
|
|
|
29,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
29,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
William D. Grace
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Susan E. Hartman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert R. Mesel
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Donald W. Wilson
|
|
|
79,783 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
79,783 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Jeffrey S. Lloyd
|
|
|
23,683 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
23,683 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Raymond L. Alarie
|
|
|
14,248 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
14,248 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Mark E. Jackson
|
|
|
23,194 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
23,194 |
|
|
|
* |
|
W. Barry Lester
|
|
|
15,709 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
15,709 |
|
|
|
* |
|
All directors and executive officers as a group
|
|
|
1,220,233 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
1,860,618 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
* |
Indicates less than 1%. |
|
|
(1) |
Unless otherwise provided, the address for each Beneficial
Owner is 10160 112 Street, Edmonton, Alberta,
Canada T5K 2L6. |
|
(2) |
Unless otherwise noted, each person has sole voting and
investment power over the shares listed opposite his or her name. |
|
(3) |
Stantec has agreed that, upon consummation of the merger, it
will appoint Aram H. Keith, currently Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Keith, to the Stantec board of directors.
Mr. Keith has indicated that he intends to elect to receive
a mix of cash and Stantec common shares as merger consideration
in exchange for the 1,374,217 shares of Keith common stock
he beneficially owns. Based on the closing sale price of Stantec
common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange on May 6, 2005,
it is estimated that the Aram H. Keith and Margie R. Keith
Revocable Trust, of which Aram H. Keith is a trustee, will
receive US$15,116,387 and 640,385 Stantec common shares as
merger consideration. |
113
Description Of Stantec Share Capital
The following is a summary description of Stantecs share
capital.
The authorized share capital of Stantec consists of an unlimited
number of preferred shares, issuable in series, and an unlimited
number of common shares of which, as at April 13, 2005, no
preferred shares and 18,937,019 common shares have been issued
and are outstanding. The material rights, privileges,
restrictions and conditions attached to the preferred shares and
the common shares are summarized below.
Preferred Shares
The preferred shares may be issued in one or more series, each
series to consist of such number of shares and to have such
rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions as may, before
the issue thereof, be determined by the board of directors of
Stantec. The holders of the preferred shares as a class are not
entitled to receive notice of or to attend any meeting of the
shareholders of Stantec and are not entitled to vote at any such
meeting, except to approve amendments to the terms of the
preferred shares as a class or as required by law. Each series
of preferred shares will rank pari passu with each other
series of preferred shares with respect to the entitlement to
dividends or distribution of assets in the event of the
liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of Stantec. The preferred
shares as a class rank ahead of the common shares with respect
to entitlement to dividends and distribution of assets in the
event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of Stantec.
Common Shares
The holders of common shares are entitled to receive, as and
when declared by the board of directors of Stantec, dividends in
such amount and in such form as the board of directors of
Stantec may from time to time determine. The holders of the
common shares are entitled to receive notice of and to attend
all meetings of shareholders of Stantec and have one vote for
each common share held at all such meetings, except for meetings
at which only holders of another specified class or series of
shares of Stantec are entitled to vote separately as a class or
series. The common shares rank behind the preferred shares with
respect to entitlement to dividends and distribution of assets
in the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of
Stantec.
114
Comparison of Shareholders Rights
General
The rights and privileges of holders of Keith common stock are
currently governed principally by:
|
|
|
|
|
the laws of California, particularly the California Corporations
Code, referred to in this proxy statement/ prospectus as the CCC; |
|
|
|
Keiths Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation,
referred to in this proxy statement/ prospectus as Keiths
charter; and |
|
|
|
Keiths Amended and Restated bylaws, referred to in this
proxy statement/ prospectus as Keiths bylaws. |
As a result of the merger, holders of Keith common stock who
receive Stantec common shares will have the rights and
privileges of those shares governed principally by:
|
|
|
|
|
the Canada Business Corporations Act, referred to in this proxy
statement/ prospectus as the CBCA; |
|
|
|
Stantecs Restated Articles of Incorporation, which are
referred to in this proxy statement/ prospectus as
Stantecs charter; and |
|
|
|
Stantecs bylaws, which are referred to in this proxy
statement/ prospectus as Stantecs bylaws. |
While the rights and privileges of shareholders of a corporation
amalgamated under the CBCA such as Stantec are, in many
instances, comparable to those of shareholders of a California
corporation such as Keith, there are material differences. The
following is a summary of the material differences between the
rights of holders of Keith common stock and the rights of
holders of Stantec common shares as of the date of this proxy
statement/ prospectus. These differences arise principally from
differences between the CCC and the CBCA and between
Keiths charter and bylaws and Stantecs charter and
bylaws.
Classes and Series of Capital Stock
Under Keiths charter, Keith may issue up to
100,000,000 shares of common stock and
5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. As of April 2,
2005, 7,985,085 shares of Keith common stock were
outstanding and no shares of Keith preferred stock were
outstanding.
Under Stantecs charter, Stantec is authorized to issue an
unlimited number of common shares and an unlimited number of
preferred shares, issuable in series. As of April 13, 2005,
18,937,019 common shares were outstanding and no preferred
shares were issued and outstanding. For a description of the
different classes of shares Stantec may issue, see
Description of Stantec Share Capital.
Annual Meetings of Shareholders
Under the CCC, if a corporation fails to hold an annual meeting
for the election of directors for a period of 60 days after
the date designated in the corporations bylaws or, if no
date has been designated, for a period of 15 months after
the organization of the corporation or after its last annual
meeting, the superior court of the proper county may order a
meeting to be held upon the application of any shareholder after
notice to the corporation giving it an opportunity to be heard.
The shares represented at a meeting called by the superior court
either in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting
constitute a quorum for the purposes of the meeting, even if the
corporations articles of incorporation or bylaws provide
for a different quorum requirement. Keiths bylaws provide
that the annual meeting will be held on such date and at such
time as may be fixed by the board of directors.
115
Under the CBCA, the directors of Stantec must call an annual
meeting of shareholders not later than 15 months after the
last preceding annual meeting and not later than six months
after the end of Stantecs preceding financial year.
Subject to certain provisions of the CBCA, the holders of not
less than 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of Stantec
that carry the right to vote at the meeting sought to be held
may request that the directors call an annual meeting. If the
directors do not call the meeting within 21 days after
receiving the requisition, any shareholder who signed such
requisition may call the meeting. The CBCA gives holders a
similar right to call a special meeting of shareholders, as
described under the caption Special Meetings of
Shareholders below. If for any reason it is impracticable
to call a meeting or to conduct a meeting in the manner in which
it is otherwise to be called or as prescribed by Stantecs
bylaws or the CBCA, any director or shareholder entitled to vote
at that meeting may apply to a court for an order calling the
meeting and setting forth the manner to hold and conduct the
meeting. The CBCA requires meetings of shareholders to be held
in Canada unless the charter specifies a place outside of Canada
where such meetings may be held. Stantecs charter does not
permit shareholders meetings to be held outside Canada.
Special Meetings of Shareholders
Under the CCC, special meetings of shareholders may be called by
the board of directors, the chairman of the board, the president
or the holders of shares entitled to cast not less than 10% of
the votes at the meeting or such additional persons as may be
provided in the articles of incorporation or bylaws. Neither
Keiths charter nor bylaws permit any additional persons to
call a special meeting.
Under the CBCA, special meetings of shareholders may be called
at any time by the board of directors. Stantecs bylaws
provide that meetings of shareholders may be called by any two
directors upon not less than 21 days notice. In
addition, subject to certain provisions of the CBCA, the holders
of not less than 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of
Stantec that carry the right to vote at the meeting sought to be
held may request that the directors call a meeting of
shareholders for any purpose. If the directors do not call the
meeting within 21 days after receiving such a requisition,
any shareholder who signed the requisition requesting the
directors to call the meeting may call the meeting. The CBCA
also requires meetings of shareholders to be held in Canada,
unless the charter specifies a place outside of Canada where
such meeting may be held. Stantecs charter does not permit
shareholders meetings to be held outside Canada.
Quorum of Shareholders
Under the CCC, a quorum consists of a majority of the shares
entitled to vote present in person or represented by proxy,
unless the articles of incorporation provide otherwise, but in
no event will a quorum consist of less than one-third of the
shares entitled to vote at the meeting or of more than a
majority of the shares entitled to vote at the meeting.
Keiths charter does not specify any requirements for a
quorum of shareholders and Keiths bylaws are consistent
with the CCC.
Under the CBCA, unless the corporations bylaws otherwise
provide, a quorum of shareholders is present at a meeting of
shareholders, irrespective of the number of persons actually
present at the meeting, if the holders of a majority of the
shares who are entitled to vote are represented in person or by
proxy at the meeting. Stantecs bylaws provide that a
quorum for a meeting of shareholders will be at least 2 persons
each holding or representing by valid proxy outstanding fully
voting preferred shares or common shares.
116
Shareholder Action Without a Meeting
Under the CCC, unless otherwise provided in the articles of
incorporation, any action that may be taken at any annual or
special meeting of shareholders may be taken without a meeting
and without prior notice if a consent in writing, setting forth
the action so taken, is signed by the holders of outstanding
shares having not less than the minimum number of votes that
would be necessary to authorize or take that action at a meeting
at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and
voted. However, directors may be elected without a meeting only
by unanimous written consent of all shares entitled to vote for
the election of directors; provided that the shareholders may
elect a director to fill a vacancy, other than a vacancy created
by removal, by the written consent of a majority of the
outstanding shares entitled to vote.
Under the CBCA, shareholder action may be taken without a
meeting of shareholders by written resolution signed by all
shareholders who would be entitled to vote on the matter at a
meeting of shareholders except with respect to a meeting called
for the purpose of (1) removing a director or the auditor
from office or (2) electing or appointing a director or
auditor following the resignation, removal or expiry of term of
office of the director or auditor where, in either case, the
director or auditor has submitted a written statement giving the
reasons why he opposes the proposed action or resolution.
Stantecs bylaws provide that, except where a written
statement is submitted by a director or auditor under the CBCA,
a resolution in writing signed by all shareholders entitled to
vote on that resolution at a shareholders meeting is as valid as
if it had been passed at a shareholders meeting.
Shareholder Nominations and Proposals
Neither the CCC nor Keiths articles or bylaws contain
provisions governing shareholder nominations of persons for
election as directors or shareholder proposals to be considered
at an annual or special meeting. However, pursuant to
Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, a shareholder can have
its proposal disclosed in a companys proxy materials and
presented to shareholders for a vote, provided the shareholder
follows the procedures and is not substantively excludable under
the SECs shareholder proposal rule.
Under the CBCA, shareholder proposals may be submitted only at
annual meetings of shareholders. A shareholder entitled to vote
at an annual meeting of shareholders and who holds (1) at
least 1% of the total number of outstanding voting shares of
Stantec or (2) shares having a fair market value of at
least C$2,000, may submit to Stantec notice of any matter that
the shareholder proposes to raise at the meeting and discuss at
the meeting any matter in respect of which the person would have
been entitled to submit a proposal. Stantec is not required to
set out the proposal in its management proxy circular if, among
other things, the proposal is not submitted to Stantec at least
90 days before the anniversary date of the notice sent to
shareholders in connection with Stantecs previous annual
meeting of shareholders. A shareholder proposal may include
nominations for the election of directors if the proposal is
signed by the holders of not less than 5% of the issued and
outstanding shares that carry the right to vote at the meeting
to which the proposal is to be presented, but this requirement
does not preclude nominations made at a meeting of shareholders.
As a foreign private issuer, Rule 14a-8 will not apply to
Stantec.
Access to Corporate Records, Financial Statements and Related
Matters
The CCC and Keiths bylaws permit a shareholder holding at
least 5% in the aggregate of the outstanding voting shares of a
corporation or who holds at least 1% of those voting shares and
has filed a Schedule 14A with the SEC has the right to
(1) inspect and copy the record of shareholders names
and
117
addresses and shareholdings during usual business hours upon
five business days prior written demand upon the
corporation, and (2) obtain from the transfer agent for the
corporation, upon written demand and the tender of its usual
charges for such a list, a list of the names and addresses of
the shareholders who are entitled to vote for the election of
directors and their shareholdings. The list shall be made
available on or before the later of five business days after the
demand is received or the date specified therein as the date as
of which the list is to be compiled. Any delay by the
corporation or the transfer agent in complying with such a
shareholder demand beyond the time limits specified therein will
give the shareholder a right to obtain from the superior court
an order postponing any shareholders meeting previously
noticed for a period equal to the period of such delay. In
addition, the record of shareholders shall be open to inspection
and copying by any shareholder or holder of a voting trust
certificate at any time during usual business hours upon written
demand on the corporation for a purpose reasonably related to
such holders interests as a shareholder or holder of a
voting trust certificate. Finally, the accounting books and
records and minutes of proceedings of the shareholders and the
board of directors and committees thereof will be open to
inspection upon the written demand on the corporation of any
shareholder at any reasonable time during usual business hours
for a purpose reasonably related to such holders interests
as a shareholder.
Under the CBCA, a corporation is required to make available to
its shareholders and creditors and their personal
representatives, specified books and records during usual
business hours of the corporation. These persons may take
extracts from these books and records free of charge. Stantec
shareholders or creditors and their personal representatives may
also access Stantecs securities register by submitting a
request and an affidavit certifying, among other things, that
the list will only be used for the purposes set out in the CBCA.
An extract of the securities register may be taken upon payment
of a reasonable fee.
Charter Amendments
Under the CCC, amendments to a corporations articles of
incorporation generally require the approval of the board of
directors and the approval of holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares entitled to vote, either before or after the
approval by the board of directors. In addition, certain
amendments must also be approved by the holders of a majority of
the outstanding shares of a class, whether or not such class is
entitled to vote thereon by the articles of incorporation. These
amendments include:
|
|
|
|
|
Certain increases or decreases in the aggregate number of
authorized shares of such class; |
|
|
|
An exchange, reclassification, or cancellation of all or part of
the shares of such class, including a reverse stock split but
excluding a stock split; |
|
|
|
An exchange, or right of exchange, of all or part of the shares
of another class into the shares of such class; |
|
|
|
A change in the rights, preferences, privileges or restrictions
of the shares of such class; |
|
|
|
Creation of a new class of shares having rights, preferences or
privileges prior to the shares of such class, or an increase in
the rights, preferences or privileges or the number of
authorized shares of any class having rights, preferences or
privileges prior to the shares of such class; |
|
|
|
In the case of preferred shares, the division of the shares of
any class into series having different rights, preferences,
privileges or restrictions or the authorization of the board of
directors to do so; and |
|
|
|
Cancellation of dividends on the shares of such class which have
accrued but have not been paid. |
Under the CBCA, any amendment to a corporations charter
generally requires approval by special resolution. Generally
speaking, such special resolution must be passed by a vote of
not less than two-thirds of
118
the votes cast by shareholders who voted in respect of the
resolution or signed by all the shareholders entitled to vote on
the resolution. In addition, if an amendment affects certain
rights of holders of a particular class or series of shares, the
approval of two-thirds of the outstanding shares of that class
or series is required.
Bylaw Amendments
Under the CCC and Keiths bylaws, bylaws may be adopted,
amended or repealed either by approval of a majority of the
outstanding shares entitled to vote or by the approval of the
board; provided, however, that after the issuance of shares, a
bylaw specifying or changing a fixed number of directors or the
maximum or minimum number or changing from a fixed to a variable
board of directors or vice versa may only be adopted by approval
of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote.
The CBCA provides that unless a corporations charter or
bylaws otherwise provide, the directors may, by resolution,
make, amend or repeal any bylaws that regulate the business or
affairs of the corporation. Where the directors make, amend or
repeal a bylaw, they are required under the CBCA to submit the
bylaw, amendment or repeal to the shareholders at the next
meeting of shareholders, and the shareholders may confirm,
reject or amend the bylaw, amendment or repeal by an ordinary
resolution. An ordinary resolution is a resolution passed by a
majority of the votes cast by shareholders who voted in respect
of the resolution. A bylaw, or an amendment or a repeal of a
bylaw, is effective from the date of the resolution of the
directors until it is confirmed, amended or rejected by the
shareholders or until the next meeting of shareholders if the
bylaw, amendment or repeal is not submitted to the shareholders
at that time.
Vote on Sale or Lease of Assets
Under the CCC, a corporation may sell, lease, convey, exchange,
transfer, or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of
its assets when approved by the board, and, unless the
transaction is in the usual and regular course of its business,
approved by a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to
vote, either before or after approval by the board and before or
after the transaction.
Under the CBCA, the sale, lease or exchange of all or
substantially all the assets of a corporation other than in the
ordinary course of business requires the approval of the
shareholders by special resolution. This resolution must be
passed by a vote of not less than two-thirds of the votes cast
by shareholders who voted in respect of the resolution, each
share carrying the right to vote whether or not it otherwise
carries the right to vote. The holders of each class or series
of shares that is affected differently by the transaction from
the shares of any other class or series are entitled to vote
separately as a class or series. Dissent rights, described
further below, are applicable to such a transaction.
Vote on Extraordinary Corporate Actions
Under the CCC, a reorganization, which includes a merger, an
exchange reorganization and a sale-of-assets reorganization,
must be approved by a majority of the outstanding shares
entitled to vote of each class of each corporation the approval
of whose board of directors is required. However, unless
provided in the articles or bylaws, no approval of any class of
outstanding preferred shares is required if the rights,
preferences, privileges and restrictions granted to or imposed
upon that class of shares remain unchanged.
Approval of the outstanding shares entitled to vote is not
required in the case of any corporation if that corporation, its
shareholders immediately before the reorganization, or both will
own, immediately after the
119
reorganization, equity securities of the surviving or acquiring
corporation possessing more than five-sixths of the voting power
of the surviving or acquiring corporation. A merger must be
approved by a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to
vote of the surviving corporation if any amendment is made to
its articles of incorporation which would otherwise require such
approval. Furthermore, a merger or sale-of-assets reorganization
must be approved by a majority of the outstanding shares
entitled to vote of any class of a corporation if holders of
shares of that class receive shares of the surviving or
acquiring corporation having different rights, preferences,
privileges or restrictions than those surrendered. Finally, if
the terms of a merger or sale-of-assets reorganization provide
that a class or series of preferred shares is to have
distributed to it a lesser amount than would be required by the
articles of incorporation, then the reorganization must be
approved by the same percentage of outstanding shares of that
class or series which would be required to approve an amendment
of the articles of incorporation to provide for the distribution
of that lesser amount.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a reorganization must be approved
by all shareholders of any class or series if, as a result of
the reorganization, the holders of that class or series become
personally liable for any obligations of a party to the
reorganization, unless all holders of that class or series have
dissenters rights. Moreover, a merger must be approved by
all of the outstanding shares entitled to vote of a corporation
if the merger agreement provides for cancellation without
consideration of all the outstanding shares of that corporation.
Under the CBCA, certain extraordinary corporate actions, such as
certain amalgamations, continuances, and sales, leases or
exchanges of all or substantially all the property of a
corporation other than in the ordinary course of business, and
other extraordinary corporate actions such as liquidations,
dissolutions and (if not ordered by a court) arrangements, are
required to be approved by special resolution. A special
resolution is a resolution passed at a meeting by not less than
two-thirds of the votes cast by the shareholders who voted in
respect of the resolution. In certain cases, a special
resolution to approve an extraordinary corporate action is also
required to be approved separately by the holders of a class or
series of shares, including in certain cases a class or series
of shares not otherwise carrying voting rights. Dissent rights,
described further below, are applicable to such transactions.
Preemptive Rights
The CCC provides that shareholders may have a preemptive right
if such a right is specifically provided in the
corporations articles of incorporation. Keiths
charter does not provide for preemptive rights.
The CBCA provides that shareholders may have a preemptive right
if such a right is specifically provided in the
corporations articles of incorporation. Stantecs
charter does not provide for preemptive rights.
Dissent Rights
Shareholders of a California corporation who dissent from a
merger or reorganization and hold dissenting shares are entitled
to be paid the fair market value for their shares.
Dissenters rights entitle the holder to require the
corporation to purchase their dissenting shares for cash at
their fair market value determined as of the day before the
first announcement of the reorganization. Dissenting shares are
generally shares which:
|
|
|
|
|
were not, immediately prior to the reorganization, listed on a
national securities exchange or designated as a Nasdaq National
Market security (not including any shares with respect to which
there exists any restriction on transfer imposed by the
corporation or by any law or regulation); |
120
|
|
|
|
|
were outstanding on the date for determination of shareholders
entitled to vote on the reorganization and were not voted in
favor of the reorganization; |
|
|
|
the dissenting shareholder has demanded that the corporation
purchase at their fair market value; and |
|
|
|
the dissenting shareholder has submitted to be endorsed with a
statement that the shares are dissenting shares. |
The CBCA provides that shareholders of a corporation are
entitled to vote on certain matters, to exercise dissent rights
and to be paid the fair value of their shares in connection
therewith. The matters giving rights to dissent rights include:
|
|
|
|
|
any amalgamation with another corporation (other than with
certain affiliated corporations); |
|
|
|
an amendment to a corporations charter to add, change or
remove any provisions restricting or constraining the issue,
transfer or ownership of shares; |
|
|
|
an amendment to a corporations charter to add, change or
remove any restriction upon the business or businesses that such
corporation may carry on; |
|
|
|
a continuance under the laws of another jurisdiction; |
|
|
|
a sale, lease or exchange of all or substantially all the
property of a corporation other than in the ordinary course of
business; |
|
|
|
a going-private transaction or a squeeze-out transaction; |
|
|
|
a court order permitting a shareholder to dissent in connection
with an application to the court for an order approving an
arrangement proposed by a corporation; or |
|
|
|
certain amendments to a corporations charter that require
a separate class or series vote, provided that a shareholder is
not entitled to dissent if an amendment to a corporations
charter is effected by a court order approving a reorganization
or by a court order made in connection with an action for an
oppression remedy, unless dissent rights are granted or ordered
by the court. |
Under the CBCA, a shareholder may, in addition to exercising
dissent rights, seek an oppression remedy (as discussed further
below) for any act or omission of a corporation which is
oppressive, unfairly prejudicial to or that unfairly disregards
a shareholders interests.
Stock Repurchases
Under the CCC, a corporation may redeem any or all shares which
are redeemable at its option by giving notice of redemption and
by payment or deposit of the redemption price. When a
corporation reacquires its own shares, those shares are restored
to the status of authorized but unissued shares, unless the
articles of incorporation prohibit them from being reissued.
Keiths charter does not contain any such prohibition on
reissuance.
Under the CBCA, except in certain specified circumstances, a
corporation may acquire its own shares unless there are
reasonable grounds for believing that the corporation is or
would be, after payment for such shares, unable to pay its
liabilities as they become due or if the realizable value of the
corporations assets would, as a result of the payment for
such shares, be less than the aggregate of its liabilities and
stated capital. Under the CBCA, a corporation that acquires its
own shares must cancel such shares and must deduct from its
stated capital account an amount equal to the stated capital
attributable to the repurchased shares.
121
Number and Qualification of Directors
The CCC provides that the minimum number of directors shall be
three, provided that as long as there is only one shareholder,
the minimum number of directors is one. The bylaws shall set
forth the number of directors of the corporation; or that the
number of directors shall be not less than a stated minimum nor
more than a stated maximum (unless such provision is contained
in the articles, in which case it may only be changed by an
amendment of the articles). Under the CCC, a corporations
articles of incorporation may provide for the election of one or
more directors by the holders of the shares of any class or
series. Keiths bylaws provide that the number of directors
will be authorized by resolution of the board of directors or
the shareholders, provided that such number will not be less
than five or greater than nine.
The CBCA requires that a corporation whose securities are
publicly traded have at least three directors, at least two of
whom are not officers or employees of such corporation or any of
its affiliates. In addition, the CBCA requires that at least 25%
of the directors of a corporation be resident Canadians.
Stantecs bylaws require that at least 50% of the directors
be resident Canadians, provided that if the corporation has less
than four directors, at least two must be resident Canadians.
Under Stantecs charter, the minimum number of directors is
three and the maximum number of directors is twenty.
Stantecs bylaws provide that a directors term of
office is from the date of the meeting at which he is elected
until the next annual meeting following the election, provided
that if an election of directors is not held at that meeting,
the incumbent directors continue in office until their
successors are elected.
Filling Vacancies on the Board of Directors
The CCC provides that, unless otherwise provided in the articles
of incorporation or bylaws and except for a vacancy created by
the removal of a director, vacancies on the board of directors
may be filled by approval of the board of directors or, if the
number of directors then in office is less than a quorum, by
(1) the unanimous written consent of the directors then in
office, (2) the affirmative vote of a majority of the
directors then in office at a meeting, or (3) the sole
remaining director. Unless the articles or a bylaw adopted by
the shareholders provide that the board may fill vacancies
occurring in the board by reason of the removal of directors,
such vacancies may be filled only by approval of the
shareholders. In addition, shareholders may elect a director at
any time to fill any vacancy not filled by directors. Any such
election by written consent, other than to fill a vacancy
created by removal (which requires the unanimous consent of all
shares entitled to vote), requires the consent of a majority of
the outstanding shares entitled to vote. If, after filling any
vacancy, the directors then in office constitute less than a
majority of the entire board, then (1) any holders of 5% or
more of the outstanding shares having the right to vote for
those directors may call a special meeting of shareholders, or
(2) the superior court may, upon application of
shareholders holding at least 5% of the outstanding shares
having the right to vote for these directors, order a special
meeting for the election of the entire board of directors.
Keiths bylaws provide that vacancies, except those
existing as a result of a removal of a director, may be filled
by a majority of the remaining directors, even though less than
a quorum, or by a sole remaining director, and each director so
elected will hold office until the next annual meeting and until
such directors successor has been elected and qualified.
In addition, shareholders may elect a director at any time to
fill any vacancy not filled by directors. Any such election by
written consent, other than to fill a vacancy created by
removal, requires the consent of a majority of the outstanding
shares entitled to vote.
122
Under the CBCA, a quorum of directors may appoint one or more
directors to fill a vacancy among the directors (except a
vacancy resulting from an increase in the number or the minimum
or maximum number of directors or a failure to elect the number
or minimum number of directors provided for in the articles) and
any director so appointed will hold office for the unexpired
term of the directors predecessor in office. Under
Stantecs bylaws, the shareholders may, by ordinary
resolution, fill any vacancy on the board of directors. In the
case of a vacancy resulting otherwise than from an increase in
the number or minimum number of directors or from a failure to
elect the number or minimum number of directors required by the
articles of incorporation, a quorum of directors may fill a
vacancy by resolution.
Removal of Directors
Under the CCC, directors generally may be removed, with or
without cause, by a majority of the outstanding shareholders
entitled to vote at an election of directors, subject to certain
exceptions.
Under the CBCA and Stantecs bylaws, the shareholders of
Stantec may by ordinary resolution at a special meeting remove
any director or directors from office. This resolution must be
passed by a vote of not less than a majority of the votes cast
by shareholders who voted in respect of the resolution.
Transactions with Directors and Officers
Under the CCC, no contract or transaction between a corporation
and one or more of its directors, or between a corporation and
any corporation, firm or association in which one or more of its
directors has a material financial interest, is void or voidable
solely because of that relationship or because that director is
present at the meeting which authorizes the contract or
transaction, if the material facts of the transaction and such
directors interest are fully disclosed and approved by the
shareholders or the directors of the corporation.
As to contracts or transactions not approved as provided above,
the person asserting the validity of the contract or transaction
sustains the burden of proving that the contract or transaction
was just and reasonable to the corporation at the time it was
authorized, approved or ratified.
Under the CBCA, no material contract or transaction between
Stantec and one or more of its directors or officers or between
Stantec and another entity of which a director or officer of
Stantec is a director or officer or in which one or more of its
directors or officers has a material interest, is void or
voidable as a result of that relationship or because that
director is present at or is counted to determine the presence
of a quorum at a meeting of directors or a committee of
directors that authorized the material contract or transaction
if:
|
|
|
|
|
the director or officer disclosed his interest in accordance
with the CBCA; |
|
|
|
the contract or transaction was approved by the
directors; and |
|
|
|
the contract or transaction was reasonable and fair to Stantec
at the time it was approved. |
Additionally, Stantecs bylaws require a director who is a
party to, or who is a director or officer of or has a material
interest in any person who is a party to a material contract
with the corporation, to disclose such interest to the
corporation. Such director is prohibited from voting on any
resolution to approve the contract, except as permitted by
the CBCA.
123
Director and Officer Liability and Indemnification
The CCC allows a corporation to include a provision in its
articles limiting or eliminating the liability of directors for
monetary damages in an action brought by or in the right of the
corporation for breach of a directors fiduciary duties to
the corporation and its shareholders, except where such breaches
include, but are not limited to, (1) acts or omissions that
involve intentional misconduct or knowing violations of the law,
(2) the receipt by the director of an improper personal
benefit, (3) the payment of unlawful dividends, the making
of unlawful asset distributions or the unlawful creation or
guarantee of financial obligations and (4) for acts or
omissions that a director believes or should reasonably believe
to be contrary to the best interests of the corporation or its
shareholders or that involve the absence of good faith on the
part of the director. Keiths charter eliminates the
liability of directors for monetary damages to the fullest
extent permitted under the CCC. Keiths charter permits
indemnification of directors and officers.
The CCC allows a corporation to indemnify directors, officers,
employees and agents. Under the CCC, a corporation shall have
power to indemnify any person who was or is a party or is
threatened to be made a party to any proceeding by reason of the
fact that the person is or was a director, officer, employee or
agent of the corporation, against expenses, judgments, fines,
settlements, and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred
in connection with the proceeding if that person acted in good
faith and in a manner the person reasonably believed to be in
the best interests of the corporation and, in the case of a
criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe the
conduct of the person was unlawful. In the context of a
derivative action in the name of or by the corporation to
procure a judgment in its favor, the corporation may provide
indemnification of expenses only.
However, under the CCC and Keiths bylaws, no
indemnification is permitted for any of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
In respect of any claim as to which the person is adjudged to be
liable to the corporation in the performance of that
persons duty to the corporation and its shareholders,
unless the court determines that the person is entitled to
indemnity for expenses; |
|
|
|
Amounts paid in settling or otherwise disposing of a pending
action without court approval; |
|
|
|
Expenses incurred in defending a pending action which is settled
or otherwise disposed of without court approval; |
|
|
|
Where it appears that indemnification would be inconsistent with
a provision of the articles, bylaws, a resolution of the
shareholders, or an agreement in effect at the time of the
accrual of the alleged cause of action asserted in the
proceeding in which the expenses were incurred or other amounts
were paid, which prohibits or otherwise limits
indemnification; or |
|
|
|
Where it appears that indemnification would be inconsistent with
any condition expressly imposed by a court in approving a
settlement. |
Any indemnification must be authorized by any of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
A majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who are not
parties to the proceeding; |
|
|
|
If such a quorum of directors is not obtainable, by independent
legal counsel in a written opinion; |
|
|
|
Approval of the shareholders with the shares owned by the person
to be indemnified not being entitled to vote; or |
|
|
|
The court in which the proceeding is or was pending upon
application made by the corporation, the agent, the attorney or
other person rendering services in connection with the defense. |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if an agent of the corporation
has been successful on the merits in defense of any proceeding,
the agent will be indemnified against expenses reasonably
incurred in connection with the proceeding.
124
The CCC and Keiths bylaws expressly authorize Keith to
purchase and maintain insurance against liability for any agent
of the corporation whether or not the corporation would have the
power to indemnify the agent. The CCC and Keiths bylaws
also allow for the advance payment of an agents expenses
prior to the final disposition of an action, provided that the
agent undertakes to repay any such amount advanced if it is
later determined that the agent is not entitled to
indemnification.
Under the CBCA, a corporation may not, by contract, resolution,
bylaw or its charter, limit the liability of its directors for
breaches of their fiduciary duties or their duty to act in
accordance with the CBCA. However, the corporation may indemnify
a director or officer, a former director or officer or a person
who acts or acted at the corporations request as a
director or officer of another entity, against all costs,
charges and expenses, including an amount paid to settle an
action or satisfy a judgment, reasonably incurred by him or her
because of any civil, criminal or administrative action or
proceeding to which he or she is made a party by reason of that
association with the corporation or the other entity, if:
|
|
|
(1) that person acted honestly and in good faith with a
view to the best interests of the corporation; and |
|
|
(2) in the case of a criminal or administrative action or
proceeding that is enforced by a monetary penalty, that person
had reasonable grounds for believing that his or her conduct was
lawful. |
These individuals are entitled to indemnity from the corporation
if the individual was not judged by the court or other competent
authority to have committed any fault or omitted to do anything
that the individual ought to have done and fulfilled the
conditions set out in (1) and (2) above. A
corporation, an individual or another entity referred to above
may apply to a court for an order approving an indemnity made
pursuant to the CBCA and the court may so order and make any
further order that it sees fit if the individual fulfills the
conditions set out in (1) and (2) above.
Stantecs bylaws provide for indemnification of directors
and officers to the fullest extent authorized by the CBCA. In
addition, Stantecs bylaws permit the indemnification of
employees and agents and give employees and agents who achieve
success as a defendant in an action an entitlement to
indemnification. Finally, Stantecs bylaws provide that the
corporation may purchase and maintain insurance for directors
and officers.
The CBCA does not expressly provide for advance payment of an
indemnified persons expenses. However, such advance
payment is permitted provided that the individual must repay the
money received if it does not fulfill the conditions set out
in (1) and (2) above.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers or
persons controlling the registrant pursuant to the foregoing
provisions, the registrant has been informed that, in the
opinion of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission,
such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in
the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
Fiduciary Duties of Directors
Directors of corporations incorporated under the CCC have
fiduciary obligations to the corporation and its shareholders.
Pursuant to these fiduciary obligations, the directors must act
in good faith in the best interests of the corporation and its
shareholders and with such care, including reasonable inquiry,
as an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use
under similar circumstances.
Directors of corporations governed by the CBCA have fiduciary
obligations to the corporation. Under the CBCA, directors of a
corporation must act honestly and in good faith with a view to
the best interests of the
125
corporation, and must exercise the care, diligence and skill
that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable
circumstances.
Derivative Action
A shareholder may bring a derivative action in California on
behalf of the corporation only if it satisfies both of the
following two conditions:
|
|
|
1) The plaintiff was a shareholder of the corporation at
the time of the transaction of which he or she complains. The
CCC provides that any shareholder who does not meet this
requirement may nevertheless be allowed, in the discretion of
the court, to maintain the action if: |
|
|
|
|
|
there is a strong prima facie case in favor of the claim
asserted on behalf of the corporation; |
|
|
|
no other similar action has been or is likely to be instituted; |
|
|
|
the plaintiff acquired the shares before there was disclosure to
the public or to the plaintiff of the wrongdoing of which
plaintiff complains; |
|
|
|
unless the action can be maintained the defendant may retain a
gain derived from defendants willful breach of a fiduciary
duty; |
|
|
|
the requested relief will not result in unjust enrichment of the
corporation or any shareholder of the corporation; and |
|
|
|
2) The plaintiff alleges in the complaint with
particularity plaintiffs efforts to secure from the board
the action plaintiff desires, or the reasons for not making such
effort, and alleges further that plaintiff has either informed
the corporation or the board in writing of the ultimate facts of
each cause of action against each defendant or delivered to the
corporation or the board a true copy of the complaint which
plaintiff proposes to file. |
Under the CBCA, a complainant (as defined below under
Oppression Remedy) may apply to the applicable court
for leave to bring an action in the name of and on behalf of a
corporation or any subsidiary, or to intervene in an existing
action to which the corporation or a subsidiary is a party, for
the purpose of prosecuting, defending or discontinuing the
action on behalf of the corporation or the subsidiary. Under the
CBCA, no action may be brought and no intervention in an action
may be made unless the court is satisfied that:
|
|
|
|
|
the complainant has given reasonable notice to the directors of
the corporation or its subsidiary of the persons intention
to apply to the court if the directors of the corporation or its
subsidiary do not bring, diligently prosecute or defend or
discontinue the action; |
|
|
|
the person is acting in good faith; and |
|
|
|
it appears to be in the interests of the corporation or its
subsidiary that the action be brought, prosecuted, defended or
discontinued. |
Under the CBCA, in connection with a derivative action, the
court may make any order it thinks fit, including an order
requiring a corporation or its subsidiary to pay reasonable
legal fees incurred by the person in connection with the action.
Oppression Remedy
The CCC does not provide an oppression remedy.
126
The CBCA provides an oppression remedy that enables the court to
make any order, both interim and final, to rectify the matters
complained of if the court is satisfied upon application by a
complainant, as defined below, that:
|
|
|
|
|
any act or omission of a corporation or an affiliate effects a
result; |
|
|
|
the business or affairs of a corporation or an affiliate are or
have been carried on or conducted in a manner; or |
|
|
|
the powers of the directors of a corporation or an affiliate are
or have been exercised in a manner, |
that is oppressive or unfairly prejudicial to or that unfairly
disregards the interest of any security holder, creditor,
director or officer of such corporation.
A complainant who may apply to a court for an order granting an
oppression remedy is:
|
|
|
|
|
a present or former registered holder or beneficial owner of
securities of a corporation or any of its affiliates; |
|
|
|
a present or former officer or director of a corporation or any
of its affiliates; |
|
|
|
the Director under the CBCA; and |
|
|
|
any other person who in the discretion of the court is a proper
person to make such application. |
The oppression remedy provides the court with an extremely broad
and flexible jurisdiction to intervene in corporate affairs to
protect reasonable expectations of shareholders and
other complainants. While conduct which is in breach of
fiduciary duties of directors or that is contrary to the legal
right of a complainant will normally trigger the courts
jurisdiction under the oppression remedy, the exercise of that
jurisdiction does not depend on a finding of a breach of such
legal and equitable rights. Furthermore, the court may order a
company to pay the interim expenses of a complainant seeking an
oppression remedy, but the complainant may be held accountable
for such interim costs on final disposition of the complaint, as
in the case of a derivative action.
Anti-Takeover and Ownership Provisions
The CCC does not contain provisions regarding the ability of an
interested shareholder of a corporation to merge with or into
other business combinations with the corporation.
The CBCA does not contain provisions regarding the ability of an
interested shareholder of a corporation to merge with or enter
into other business combinations with the corporation. However,
rules and policies of certain Canadian securities regulatory
authorities, including Rule 61-501 of the Ontario
Securities Commission, contain requirements in connection with
related party transactions. A related party
transaction means, generally, any transaction by which an issuer
directly or indirectly:
|
|
|
|
|
acquires, sells, leases, transfers or disposes of an asset; |
|
|
|
acquires or issues treasury securities; |
|
|
|
assumes or transfers a liability; or |
|
|
|
borrows money from or lends money; |
from or to, as the case may be, a related party by any means in
any one or any combination of transactions.
127
Related party is defined in Rule 61-501 and
includes directors, senior officers and holders of more than 10%
of the voting securities of the issuer or holders of a
sufficient number of any securities of the issuer to materially
affect control of the issuer. Rule 61-501 requires, subject
to certain exceptions:
|
|
|
|
|
more detailed disclosure in the proxy material sent to security
holders in connection with a related party transaction; |
|
|
|
the preparation of a formal valuation of the subject matter of
the related party transaction and any non-cash consideration
offered for the subject matter; and |
|
|
|
the inclusion of a summary of the valuation in the proxy
material. |
Rule 61-501 also requires, subject to certain exceptions,
that an issuer not engage in a related party transaction unless
the shareholders of the issuer, other than the related parties,
approve the transaction by a simple majority of the votes cast
and, in certain circumstances, that a formal valuation for the
related party transaction be prepared and filed with the
appropriate securities regulator and included in any required
disclosure document provided to shareholders of the issuer.
Voluntary Dissolution
Under the CCC, any corporation may elect voluntarily to wind up
and dissolve by the vote of shareholders holding shares
representing 50% or more of the voting power. In addition, any
corporation which comes within one of the following descriptions
may elect by approval by the board to wind up and dissolve:
|
|
|
|
|
A corporation as to which an order for relief has been entered
under Chapter 7 of the federal bankruptcy law; |
|
|
|
A corporation which has disposed of all of its assets and has
not conducted any business for a period of five years
immediately preceding the adoption of the resolution electing to
dissolve the corporation; or |
|
|
|
A corporation which has issued no shares. |
A voluntary election to wind up and dissolve may be revoked
prior to distribution of any assets by the vote of shareholders
holding shares representing a majority of the voting power, or
by approval by the board if the election was by the board.
Under the CBCA, the directors may propose, or a shareholder who
is entitled to vote at an annual meeting of shareholders of
Stantec may make a proposal in accordance with the shareholder
proposal requirements of the CBCA for, the voluntary liquidation
and dissolution of Stantec. A voluntary dissolution of Stantec
would require approval by special resolution of the holders of
each class of shares of Stantec, whether or not they are
otherwise entitled to vote. A special resolution is a resolution
passed at a meeting by not less than two-thirds of the votes
cast by the shareholders who voted in respect of the resolution.
Experts
The consolidated financial statements of Stantec Inc. as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and for each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, included in
this proxy statement/ prospectus, have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm, as set forth in their report appearing
elsewhere herein, and are included in this proxy statement/
prospectus in reliance upon such report given on the authority
of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of The Keith Companies,
Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and
managements assessment
128
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004 have been incorporated by
reference herein in reliance upon the reports of KPMG LLP,
independent registered public accounting firm, incorporated by
reference herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts
in accounting and auditing.
Legal Matters
Stantecs counsel, Shearman & Sterling LLP,
Commerce Court West, 199 Bay Street, Suite 4405,
Toronto, Ontario, M5L 1E8, Canada, and 1080 Marsh
Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025, will deliver an opinion to Stantec
concerning the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the
merger. The validity of the Stantec common shares offered hereby
will be passed upon by Stantecs Canadian counsel, Fraser
Milner Casgrain LLP, 2900 Manulife Place,
10180-101 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, T5J 3V5, Canada.
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, 2029 Century Park
East, 22nd floor, Los Angeles, CA 90067, counsel to
Keith, will deliver to Keith an opinion concerning the
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger.
Shareholder Proposals
In order to be considered for inclusion in Keiths proxy
statement for the Keiths 2006 annual meeting of
shareholders, should such meeting take place, shareholder
proposals must be received at Keiths principal executive
offices at 19 Technology Drive, Irvine, CA 92618, by
December 11, 2005 and otherwise comply with the
requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act. In
addition, for business to be properly brought before
Keiths 2006 annual meeting of shareholders (other than
shareholder proposals submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of
the Exchange Act), should such a meeting take place,
shareholders must give notice of the proposed business to the
Secretary of Keith at Keiths principal executive offices
not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to
the date of the first anniversary date of the this years
annual meeting. If the date of Keiths annual meeting is
advanced or delayed by more than 30 days, shareholders must
give notice of the proposed business to the Secretary of Keith
at Keiths principal executive offices not earlier than
120 days prior to the annual meeting and not later than the
close of business on the later of the ninetieth day prior to the
annual meeting or the tenth day following the first public
announcement of the date of the annual meeting. Such notice must
include a brief description of the business desired to be
brought before the meeting, the reasons for conducting such
business at the meeting and any material interest in such
business of such shareholder, the shareholders name and
address and the class and the number of shares of Keith which
are owned beneficially and of record by such shareholder.
Enforceability of Civil Liabilities
Stantec is a corporation governed by the Canada Business
Corporation Act. A substantial portion of Stantecs assets
and operations are located outside the United States, and some
of Stantecs directors and officers and the experts named
in this proxy statement/ prospectus are residents outside of the
United States. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to
effect service within the United States upon Stantec and those
directors, officers and experts, or to realize in the United
States upon judgments of courts of the United States predicated
upon civil liability of Stantec and such directors, officers or
experts under the United States federal securities laws. There
is uncertainty as to the enforceability in Canada by a court in
original actions, or in actions to enforce judgments of United
States courts, of the civil liabilities predicated upon the
United States federal securities laws.
129
Where You Can Find More Information
Keith files annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy
statements and other information with the SEC under the Exchange
Act.
You may read and copy any reports, statements or other
information filed by Keith at the SECs public reference
room, located in room 5080 at Station Place, 100 F Street,
N.E. Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information on the
operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330. You may also obtain copies of this information
by mail from the Public Reference Section of the SEC at the
above address, at prescribed rates. The SEC also maintains a web
site that contains reports, proxy statements and other
information about issuers, like Keith, who file electronically
with the SEC. The address of that site is http://www.sec.gov.
Stantec has a registration statement on Form F-4 to
register with the SEC the Stantec common shares to be issued
pursuant to the merger. This prospectus is a part of that
registration statement in addition to being a proxy statement
for Keiths shareholders.
This proxy statement/ prospectus does not contain all the
information you can find in the registration statement or the
exhibits to the registration statement. Please refer to the
registration statement for further information with respect to
Keith, Stantec and Stantec common shares.
This proxy statement/ prospectus incorporates documents by
reference information, which means that we disclose important
information to you by referring you to another document filed
separately with the SEC. These documents contain important
information about Keith and its financial condition. The
information incorporated by reference is deemed to be part of
this prospectus, except for any information superseded by
information contained directly in this prospectus. This proxy
statement/ prospectus incorporates by reference the documents
set forth below that Keith has previously filed with the SEC.
|
|
|
The Keith Companies, Inc. SEC Filings |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Annual Report on Form 10-K
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004, as filed on March 10,
2005 |
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed on May 10, 2005
and Quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed on August 5,
2005 |
Current Report on Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on February 14, 2005, April 18, 2005,
May 26, 2005 and August 12, 2005 |
Schedule 14A Definitive Proxy Statement
|
|
Filed on April 12, 2005 |
All documents filed by Keith pursuant to Section 13(a),
13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from the date of this
prospectus to the date that shares are accepted for exchange
pursuant to our offer (or the date that our offer is terminated)
shall also be deemed to be incorporated into this prospectus by
reference.
Documents incorporated by reference are available from us
without charge upon request to:
|
|
|
|
|
The Keith Companies, Inc.
19 Technology Drive
Irvine, California, USA
92618-2334
Phone: (949) 923-6001
Attention: Investor Relations |
|
Stantec Inc.
10160-112 Street
Edmonton, Canada, T5K 2L6
Phone: (780) 917-7000
Attention: Investor Relations |
|
The Altman Group, Inc.
1275 Valley Brook Avenue
Lyndhurst, NJ 07071
Phone: (201) 806-2205
Attention: Charlotte Brown |
130
In order to ensure timely delivery, any request should be
submitted no later than September 6, 2005. If you request
any incorporated documents from us, we will mail them to you by
first class mail, or another equally prompt means, within one
business day after we receive your request.
We have not authorized anyone to give any information or make
any representation about our offer that is different from, or in
addition to, that contained in this proxy statement/ prospectus
or in any of the materials that we have incorporated by
reference into this proxy/statement prospectus. Therefore, if
anyone does give you information of this sort, you should not
rely on it. If you are in a jurisdiction where offers to
exchange or sell, or solicitations of offers to exchange or
purchase, the securities offered by this document are unlawful,
or if you are a person to whom it is unlawful to direct these
types of activities, then the offer presented in this document
does not extend to you. The information contained in this
document speaks only as of the date of this document unless the
information specifically indicates that another date applies.
131
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
STANTEC INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as at December 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Income and Retained Earnings for the
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as at June 30, 2005
and December 31, 2004
|
|
|
F-26 |
|
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income and Retained
Earnings for the Two Quarters Ended June 30, 2005
and 2004
|
|
|
F-27 |
|
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Two
Quarters Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
F-28 |
|
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-29 |
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-35 |
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as at
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
F-36 |
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income
for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
|
|
|
F-37 |
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income
for the Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
F-38 |
|
Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
|
|
|
F-39 |
|
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Directors of Stantec Inc.
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Stantec Inc.
as at December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the consolidated
statements of income and retained earnings and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2004. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally
accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial
position of the Company as at December 31, 2004 and 2003
and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004
in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting
principles.
|
|
|
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|
|
|
Chartered Accountants |
Edmonton, Canada,
February 11, 2005
(except for notes 20 and 21
which are as of May 5, 2005)
F-2
STANTEC INC.
(Incorporated under the laws of Canada)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at | |
|
As at | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
$ | |
|
$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands of Canadian | |
|
|
dollars) | |
ASSETS [note 7] |
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
37,890 |
|
|
|
7,343 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$21,095 in 2004
($16,952 2003)
|
|
|
112,476 |
|
|
|
87,101 |
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings
|
|
|
40,861 |
|
|
|
67,094 |
|
Income taxes recoverable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,921 |
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
4,165 |
|
|
|
3,246 |
|
Future income tax assets [note 14]
|
|
|
8,532 |
|
|
|
5,924 |
|
Other assets [note 6]
|
|
|
4,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,755 |
|
|
|
177,629 |
|
Property and equipment [note 3]
|
|
|
48,262 |
|
|
|
67,670 |
|
Goodwill [note 4]
|
|
|
84,694 |
|
|
|
69,696 |
|
Intangible assets [note 5]
|
|
|
6,278 |
|
|
|
5,112 |
|
Future income tax assets [note 14]
|
|
|
6,357 |
|
|
|
3,487 |
|
Other assets [note 6]
|
|
|
7,754 |
|
|
|
2,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362,100 |
|
|
|
326,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank indebtedness [note 7]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,151 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
78,718 |
|
|
|
68,796 |
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings
|
|
|
18,832 |
|
|
|
16,882 |
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
5,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt [note 8]
|
|
|
12,820 |
|
|
|
13,416 |
|
Future income tax liabilities [note 14]
|
|
|
10,653 |
|
|
|
10,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,755 |
|
|
|
127,047 |
|
Long-term debt [note 8]
|
|
|
21,155 |
|
|
|
31,159 |
|
Other liabilities [note 9]
|
|
|
16,818 |
|
|
|
1,459 |
|
Future income tax liabilities [note 14]
|
|
|
8,316 |
|
|
|
6,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,044 |
|
|
|
166,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies [notes 10 and 11]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital [note 12]
|
|
|
87,656 |
|
|
|
84,281 |
|
Contributed surplus [note 12]
|
|
|
2,544 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
Cumulative translation account [note 13]
|
|
|
(19,018 |
) |
|
|
(13,861 |
) |
Retained earnings
|
|
|
117,874 |
|
|
|
88,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,056 |
|
|
|
160,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362,100 |
|
|
|
326,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
F-3
STANTEC INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year | |
|
Year | |
|
Year | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
$ | |
|
$ | |
|
$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands of Canadian dollars | |
|
|
except per share amounts) | |
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenue
|
|
|
520,879 |
|
|
|
459,942 |
|
|
|
428,456 |
|
Less subconsultant and other direct expenses
|
|
|
71,728 |
|
|
|
68,546 |
|
|
|
63,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
|
449,151 |
|
|
|
391,396 |
|
|
|
365,148 |
|
Direct payroll costs
|
|
|
205,513 |
|
|
|
183,471 |
|
|
|
173,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
243,638 |
|
|
|
207,925 |
|
|
|
191,539 |
|
|
Administrative and marketing expenses
|
|
|
183,739 |
|
|
|
154,788 |
|
|
|
145,515 |
|
Depreciation of property and equipment
|
|
|
11,986 |
|
|
|
9,912 |
|
|
|
9,502 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
Net interest expense [note 8]
|
|
|
2,805 |
|
|
|
2,637 |
|
|
|
2,630 |
|
Foreign exchange (gains) losses
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Share of income from associated companies
|
|
|
(385 |
) |
|
|
(580 |
) |
|
|
(355 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
44,660 |
|
|
|
39,628 |
|
|
|
33,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes [note 14]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
18,065 |
|
|
|
10,050 |
|
|
|
12,949 |
|
Future
|
|
|
(3,595 |
) |
|
|
4,508 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,470 |
|
|
|
14,558 |
|
|
|
12,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the year
|
|
|
30,190 |
|
|
|
25,070 |
|
|
|
20,192 |
|
Retained earnings, beginning of the year
|
|
|
88,266 |
|
|
|
64,240 |
|
|
|
44,690 |
|
Shares repurchased [note 12]
|
|
|
(582 |
) |
|
|
(1,044 |
) |
|
|
(642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings, end of the year
|
|
|
117,874 |
|
|
|
88,266 |
|
|
|
64,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share [note 15]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1.63 |
|
|
|
1.37 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
1.31 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
See accompanying notes
F-4
STANTEC INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year | |
|
Year | |
|
Year | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
$ | |
|
$ | |
|
$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands of Canadian dollars) | |
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash receipts from clients
|
|
|
568,897 |
|
|
|
465,114 |
|
|
|
437,354 |
|
Cash paid to suppliers
|
|
|
(169,573 |
) |
|
|
(156,460 |
) |
|
|
(128,148 |
) |
Cash paid to employees
|
|
|
(313,321 |
) |
|
|
(274,444 |
) |
|
|
(257,667 |
) |
Dividends from equity investments
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
Interest received
|
|
|
6,426 |
|
|
|
2,710 |
|
|
|
3,970 |
|
Interest paid
|
|
|
(8,639 |
) |
|
|
(4,462 |
) |
|
|
(6,122 |
) |
Income taxes paid, net
|
|
|
(6,739 |
) |
|
|
(15,565 |
) |
|
|
(13,453 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities [note 16]
|
|
|
77,351 |
|
|
|
16,893 |
|
|
|
36,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business acquisitions, including cash acquired and bank
indebtedness assumed [note 2]
|
|
|
(18,845 |
) |
|
|
(6,046 |
) |
|
|
(17,409 |
) |
Cash of joint venture held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(369 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of investments held for self-insured liabilities
|
|
|
(9,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds on disposition of investments
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
2,158 |
|
Proceeds on disposition of Technology segment
|
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds on disposition of subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,856 |
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(17,488 |
) |
|
|
(28,713 |
) |
|
|
(17,444 |
) |
Proceeds on disposition of property and equipment
|
|
|
34,672 |
|
|
|
1,444 |
|
|
|
1,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities
|
|
|
(10,154 |
) |
|
|
(33,489 |
) |
|
|
(29,227 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(35,546 |
) |
|
|
(20,592 |
) |
|
|
(18,619 |
) |
Proceeds from long-term borrowings
|
|
|
13,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,540 |
|
Net change in bank indebtedness financing
|
|
|
(17,151 |
) |
|
|
17,151 |
|
|
|
(14,671 |
) |
Repurchase of shares for cancellation [note 12]
|
|
|
(720 |
) |
|
|
(1,392 |
) |
|
|
(880 |
) |
Proceeds from issue of share capital [note 12]
|
|
|
3,490 |
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
18,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(35,967 |
) |
|
|
(4,182 |
) |
|
|
14,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange loss on cash held in foreign currency
|
|
|
(683 |
) |
|
|
(1,081 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
30,547 |
|
|
|
(21,859 |
) |
|
|
21,676 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the year
|
|
|
7,343 |
|
|
|
29,202 |
|
|
|
7,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the year
|
|
|
37,890 |
|
|
|
7,343 |
|
|
|
29,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
F-5
STANTEC INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1. |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Stantec Inc. (the Company) is a provider of
comprehensive professional services in the area of
infrastructure and facilities for clients in the public and
private sectors. The Companys services include planning,
engineering, architecture, interior design, landscape
architecture, surveying and geomatics, environmental sciences,
and project economics.
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
The Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in
accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP). The effects of differences between the
application of Canadian and United States GAAP on the financial
statements of the Company are described in note 21. The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant
estimates used in the preparation of these consolidated
financial statements include the percentage of completion of
fixed fee and variable fee with ceiling contracts, provisions
for losses on incomplete contracts, allowances for doubtful
accounts receivable, provision for legal claims, provision for
self-insured liabilities, the fair value of stock-based awards,
the fair value of identifiable intangible assets acquired in
business acquisitions, and future cash flows used to estimate
the fair value of reporting units for goodwill impairment
purposes. Actual results may differ from these estimates. These
financial statements have, in managements opinion, been
properly prepared within reasonable limits of materiality and
within the framework of the accounting policies summarized below.
On January 1, 2004, the Company adopted the recommendations
of Section 1100 of the CICA Handbook, Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles. This section establishes standards for
financial reporting in accordance with GAAP. It describes what
constitutes GAAP and its sources and states that an entity
should apply every primary source of GAAP that deals with the
accounting and reporting in financial statements of transactions
or events it encounters. The initial adoption of these
recommendations on a prospective basis on January 1, 2004,
did not have an impact on the Companys financial
statements.
Principles of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its subsidiary companies, all of which are
wholly owned. The results of the operations of subsidiaries
acquired during the year are included from their respective
dates of acquisition.
Joint ventures and partnerships are accounted for on the
proportionate consolidation basis, which results in the Company
recording its pro rata share of the assets, liabilities,
revenues, and expenses of each of these entities.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and unrestricted
investments with initial maturities of three months or less.
Such investments are carried at the lower of cost or market
value.
Investments
Investments in associated companies over which the Company is
able to exercise significant influence, but not control, are
accounted for using the equity method, which reflects the
Companys investment at original cost plus its share of
earnings (losses) net of dividends received. These include
Teshmont Consultants Inc. (50%), SSBV Consultants Inc. (33.3%)
and Planning & Stantec Limited (50%).
F-6
Other investments, including investments held for self-insured
liabilities, are recorded at cost. When a loss in the value of
such investments occurs that is other than temporary, the
investment is written down to recognize the loss.
Property and equipment
Property and equipment is recorded at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation is calculated at annual rates
designed to write off the costs of assets over their estimated
useful lives as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering equipment
|
|
20% - 30% |
|
declining balance |
Business information systems
|
|
|
|
straight-line over 3 to 5 years |
Office equipment
|
|
20% - 30% |
|
declining balance |
Automotive equipment
|
|
30% |
|
declining balance |
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
|
straight-line over term of lease plus one renewal period to a
maximum of 15 years or the improvements economic life |
Buildings
|
|
4% - 5% |
|
declining balance |
Leases
Leases that transfer substantially all of the risks and benefits
of ownership of assets to the Company are accounted for as
capital leases. Assets under capital leases are recorded at the
inception of the lease together with the related long-term
obligation to reflect the purchase and financing thereof. Rental
payments under operating leases are expensed as incurred.
From time to time, the Company enters into or renegotiates
premises operating leases that result in the receipt of lease
inducement benefits. These benefits are accounted for as a
reduction of rental expense over the terms of the associated
leases.
Goodwill and intangible assets
The cost of intangible assets with finite lives is amortized
over the period in which the benefits of such assets are
expected to be realized, principally on a straight-line basis.
The Companys policy is to amortize client relationships
with determinable lives over periods ranging from 10 to
15 years. Contract backlog is amortized over estimated
contractual lives of generally less than one year. Other
intangible assets include technology and non-compete agreements,
which are amortized over estimated lives of one to three years.
Goodwill is not amortized but is evaluated annually, or more
frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would
indicate that the carrying amount may be impaired, for
impairment by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit,
determined on a discounted after-tax cash flow basis, to the
carrying value. An impairment loss would be recognized if the
carrying value of the goodwill were to exceed its fair value.
Long-lived assets
The Company monitors the recoverability of long-lived assets,
including property and equipment and intangible assets with
finite lives, using factors such as expected future asset
utilization, business climate and future undiscounted cash flows
expected to result from the use of the related assets. An
impairment loss would be recognized if the carrying value of the
long-lived asset were to exceed its fair value.
Accrual and investments held for self-insured liabilities
The Company self-insures certain risks related to professional
liability. The accrual for self-insured liabilities includes
estimates of the costs of reported claims (including potential
claims that are probable of being asserted) and is based on
estimates of loss using assumptions made by management,
including consideration of actuarial projections. The accrual
for self-insured liabilities does not include unasserted claims,
where assertion by a third party is not probable.
F-7
The Company invests funds to support the accrual for
self-insured liabilities. These investments are classified in
other assets as investments held for self-insured liabilities.
Forward contracts
The Company enters into forward currency exchange contracts to
manage risk associated with net operating assets denominated in
US dollars. The Companys policy is to not utilize
derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative
purposes. These derivative contracts, which are not accounted
for as hedges, are marked to market, and any changes in the
market value are recorded in income or expense when the changes
occur. The fair value of these instruments is recorded as
accounts receivable or payable.
Non-interest bearing debt
Non-interest bearing debt is carried at its present value using
discount rates based on the bank prime rate prevailing at the
time the debt was issued. The discount is applied over the term
of the debt and is charged to interest expense.
Fair value of financial instruments
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings,
bank indebtedness, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and
billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings approximate
their fair values because of the short-term maturity of these
instruments. The carrying amount of bank indebtedness
approximates fair value because the applicable interest rate is
based on variable reference rates or is fixed for a short term.
The carrying values of other financial assets and financial
liabilities approximate fair values except as otherwise
disclosed in the financial statements.
Credit risk
Financial instruments that subject the Company to credit risk
consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, investments held
for self-insured liabilities, accounts receivable, and costs and
estimated earnings in excess of billings. The Company maintains
an allowance for estimated credit losses and mitigates the risk
of its investment in bonds through the overall quality and mix
of its bond portfolio. The Company provides services to diverse
clients in various industries and sectors of the economy, and
its credit risk is not concentrated in any particular client,
industry, economic or geographic sector.
Interest rate risk
The Company is subject to interest rate risk to the extent that
its credit facilities are based on floating rates of interest.
In addition, the Company is subject to interest rate pricing
risk to the extent that the Companys investments held for
self-insured liabilities contain fixed rate government and
corporate bonds. The Company has not entered into any derivative
agreements to mitigate these risks.
Revenue recognition
In the course of providing its services, the Company incurs
certain direct costs for subconsultants and other expenditures
that are recoverable directly from clients. These direct costs
are included in the Companys gross revenue. Since such
direct costs can vary significantly from contract to contract,
changes in gross revenue may not be indicative of the
Companys revenue trends. Accordingly, the Company also
reports net revenue, which is gross revenue less subconsultant
and other direct expenses.
Revenue from fixed fee and variable fee with ceiling contracts
is recognized using the percentage of completion method.
Contract revenue is recognized on the ratio of contract costs
incurred to total estimated costs. Provisions for estimated
losses on incomplete contracts are made in the period in which
the losses are determined. Revenue from time and material
contracts without stated ceilings and from short-term projects
is recognized as costs are incurred. Revenue is calculated based
on billing rates for the services performed. Costs and estimated
earnings in excess of billings represents work in progress that
has been recognized as
F-8
revenue but not yet invoiced to clients. Billings in excess of
costs and estimated earnings represents amounts that have been
invoiced to clients but not yet recognized as revenue.
Employee benefit plans
The Company contributes to group retirement savings plans and an
employee share purchase plan based on the amount of employee
contributions subject to maximum limits per employee. The
Company accounts for such defined contributions as an expense in
the period in which the contributions are made. The expense
recorded in 2004 is $7,311,000 (2003 $5,980,000;
2002 $5,942,000). The Company does not provide
postemployment or postretirement benefits.
Foreign currency translation
Transactions denominated in a foreign currency and the financial
statements of foreign subsidiaries (excluding US-based
subsidiaries) included in the consolidated financial statements
are translated as follows: monetary items at the rate of
exchange in effect at the balance sheet date; non-monetary items
at historical exchange rates; and revenue and expense items
(except depreciation and amortization, which are translated at
historical exchange rates) at the average exchange rate for the
year. Any resulting gains or losses are included in income in
the year incurred.
The Companys US-based subsidiaries are designated as
self-sustaining operations. The financial statements of these
subsidiaries are translated using the current rate method. Under
this method, assets and liabilities are translated at the rate
of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date, and revenue and
expense items (including depreciation and amortization) are
translated at the average rate of exchange for the year. The
resulting exchange gains and losses are deferred and included as
a separate component of shareholders equity in the
cumulative translation account.
Stock-based compensation and other stock-based payments
The Company has one share option plan, which is described in
note 12, and accounts for grants under this plan in
accordance with the fair value based method of accounting for
stock-based compensation. Compensation expense for stock options
awarded under the plan is measured at the fair value at the
grant date using the Black-Scholes valuation model and is
recognized over the vesting period of the options granted. In
years prior to January 1, 2002, the Company recognized no
compensation expense when shares or stock options were issued.
Income taxes
The Company uses the liability method to account for income
taxes. Under this method, future income tax assets and
liabilities are determined based on differences between
financial reporting and the tax bases of assets and liabilities
and measured using the substantively enacted tax rates and laws
that will be in effect when these differences are expected to
reverse.
Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is computed based on the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the year.
Diluted earnings per share is computed using the treasury stock
method, which assumes that the cash that would be received on
the exercise of options is applied to purchase shares at the
average price during the year and that the difference between
the shares issued upon the exercise of options and the number of
shares obtainable under this computation, on a weighted average
basis, is added to the number of shares outstanding.
Antidilutive options are not considered in computing diluted
earnings per share.
F-9
Allowance for doubtful accounts
The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for
estimated losses resulting from the inability to collect on its
contracts and receivables. The Company uses estimates in
arriving at its allowance for doubtful accounts that are based,
primarily, on the age of the receivable outstanding.
Acquisitions are accounted for under the purchase method of
accounting, and the results of earnings since the respective
dates of acquisition are included in the consolidated statements
of income. The purchase prices of acquisitions are generally
subject to price adjustment clauses included in the purchase
agreements. From time to time, as a result of the timing of
acquisitions in relation to the Companys reporting
schedule, certain of the purchase price allocations may not be
finalized at the initial time of reporting. In the case of some
acquisitions, additional consideration may be payable based on
future performance parameters. As at December 31, 2004, the
maximum contingent consideration that may be payable in 2005 and
future years is approximately $712,000. Such additional
consideration is recorded as goodwill in the period in which the
contingency is resolved.
During 2004, the Company acquired the shares and businesses of
The Sear-Brown Group (April 2, 2004), GBR Architects
Limited (May 31, 2004), and Dunlop Architects Inc.
(October 8, 2004) and the assets and business of Shaflik
Engineering (November 26, 2004). The Company also adjusted
the purchase price on the Cosburn Patterson Mather Limited
(2002), The Spink Corporation (2001), APAI Architecture Inc. and
Mandalian Enterprises Limited (2003), Graeme & Murray
Consultants Ltd. (2002), Ecological Services Group Inc. (2003),
and The RPA Group (2002) acquisitions pursuant to price
adjustment clauses included in the purchase agreements. The
purchase price allocations for the Dunlop Architects Inc. and
GBR Architects Limited acquisitions have not yet been finalized.
Purchase price allocations are completed after the vendors
final financial statements and income tax returns have been
prepared and accepted by the Company. We expect to finalize
these purchase price allocations during the second quarter of
2005.
The Sear-Brown acquisition opens up a new geographic market for
the Company in the US Northeast and a new practice area in
the Bio/Pharmaceuticals industry. The acquisition of
GBR Architects and Dunlop Architects supplements the
Companys Architecture & Interior Design practice
while increasing the Companys presence in Winnipeg and the
Greater Toronto Area, respectively. The Shaflik Engineering
acquisition strengthens the Companys capabilities for
upcoming Olympic projects in British Columbia with their strong
involvement in sports facilities and transportation systems.
During 2003, the Company acquired the shares and businesses of
APAI Architecture Inc. and Mandalian Enterprises Limited
(January 2, 2003) and of Ecological Services Group Inc.
(May 30, 2003) for consideration consisting of cash and
promissory notes and the net assets and businesses of Optimum
Energy Management Incorporated (October 31, 2003) and Inner
Dimension Design Associates Inc. (November 28, 2003) for
cash consideration. The Company also paid additional contingent
consideration in connection with the Cosburn Patterson Mather
Limited (2002) acquisition and adjusted the purchase price
on The Pentacore Group of Companies (2001), English Harper Reta
Architects (2002), Site Consultants, Inc. (2002), Beak
International Incorporated (2002), GeoViro Engineering Ltd.
(2002), McCartan Consulting Ltd. (2002), and The RPA Group
(2002) acquisitions pursuant to price adjustment clauses
included in the purchase agreements.
The acquisition of APAI Architecture Inc. and Mandalian
Enterprises Limited increased the breadth and depth of the
Companys planning, architecture, and interior design
professional services and the acquisition of ESG International
Inc. increased the Companys environmental management
services and presence throughout Ontario.
F-10
Details of the aggregate consideration given and the fair values
of net assets acquired are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cash consideration
|
|
|
12,432 |
|
|
|
4,300 |
|
Promissory notes
|
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
3,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price
|
|
|
13,919 |
|
|
|
7,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and liabilities acquired at fair values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank indebtedness assumed
|
|
|
(6,413 |
) |
|
|
(1,746 |
) |
Non-cash working capital
|
|
|
6,057 |
|
|
|
3,578 |
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
3,211 |
|
|
|
1,337 |
|
Investments other
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
18,425 |
|
|
|
3,848 |
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
2,158 |
|
|
|
1,344 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(1,642 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
(8,414 |
) |
|
|
(646 |
) |
Future income taxes
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
|
13,919 |
|
|
|
7,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the goodwill, $18,413,000 (2003 $3,816,000) is
non-deductible for income tax purposes.
The following unaudited pro forma data presents information as
if the acquisitions of Ecological Services Group Inc., Optimum
Energy Management Incorporated, Inner Dimension Design
Associates Inc., The Sear-Brown Group, Inc., GBR Architects
Limited, Dunlop Architects Inc. and Shaflik Engineering Ltd. had
occurred on January 1, 2003. The pro forma data is provided
for information purposes only and is based on historical
information. The pro forma data does not necessarily reflect the
actual results of operations that would have occurred had these
acquired entities and Stantec Inc. comprised a single entity
during the periods, nor is it necessarily indicative of future
results of operations of the combined entities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma | |
|
|
for the years ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
Pro forma gross revenue (in thousands)
|
|
$ |
554,338 |
|
|
$ |
567,879 |
|
Pro forma net revenue (in thousands)
|
|
$ |
474,287 |
|
|
$ |
475,085 |
|
Pro forma net income (in thousands)
|
|
$ |
31,171 |
|
|
$ |
25,356 |
|
Basic pro forma earnings per share
|
|
|
1.68 |
|
|
|
1.38 |
|
Diluted pro forma earnings per share
|
|
|
1.64 |
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
F-11
|
|
3. |
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
Cost | |
|
|
|
Depreciation | |
|
Cost | |
|
|
|
Depreciation | |
|
|
$000s | |
|
|
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
|
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Engineering equipment
|
|
|
33,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
19,058 |
|
|
|
27,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
12,257 |
|
Business information systems
|
|
|
9,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,796 |
|
|
|
7,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
328 |
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
19,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
7,519 |
|
|
|
17,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
6,017 |
|
Automotive equipment
|
|
|
4,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,578 |
|
|
|
3,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,850 |
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
11,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,031 |
|
|
|
6,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,386 |
|
Buildings
|
|
|
1,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
27,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,553 |
|
Land
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
33,576 |
|
|
|
91,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
23,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2004 the Company completed the sale of its Edmonton office
building (included in buildings and land) for cash proceeds of
$34,500,000. Concurrent with the sale, the Company leased the
property back for a period of 15 years. The lease is
accounted for as an operating lease. The resulting gain of
$7,103,000 has been deferred and will be amortized over the
lease term [note 9].
Included in buildings is construction work in progress in the
amount of $89,000 (2003 $8,942,000) on which
depreciation has not started.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Goodwill, beginning of year
|
|
|
69,696 |
|
|
|
72,423 |
|
Current year acquisitions
|
|
|
18,006 |
|
|
|
5,047 |
|
Additional purchase price payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
925 |
|
Other purchase price adjustments
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
(2,124 |
) |
Impact of foreign exchange on goodwill balances
|
|
|
(3,427 |
) |
|
|
(6,575 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill, end of year
|
|
|
84,694 |
|
|
|
69,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
|
Carrying | |
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
Carrying | |
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
|
|
Amortization | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
|
Amortization | |
|
|
$000s | |
|
|
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
|
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Client relationships
|
|
|
6,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
5,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
691 |
|
Contract backlog
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
901 |
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
6,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once an intangible asset is fully amortized, the gross carrying
amount and the related accumulated amortization are removed from
the accounts.
F-12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Investments held for self-insured liabilities
|
|
|
9,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in associated companies
|
|
|
1,909 |
|
|
|
1,844 |
|
Investments other
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
1,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,585 |
|
|
|
2,981 |
|
Less current portion of investments held for self-insured
liabilities
|
|
|
4,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,754 |
|
|
|
2,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The investments held for self-insured liabilities consist of
government and corporate bonds of $8,740,000 and equity
securities of $822,000. The bonds bear interest at rates ranging
from 3.5 to 8.6% per annum. The estimated fair value of the
bonds at December 31, 2004, is $8,761,000 and of the
equities is $839,000. The term to maturity of the bond portfolio
is $1,580,000 due within one year and $7,160,000 due from one to
five years. Under US GAAP, these investments would be classified
as investments available for sale and recorded at fair value.
The Company has a revolving credit facility in the amount of
$30 million to support general business operations. The
facility matures on July 30, 2005, subject to extension by
the parties for a 364-day period. Depending on the form under
which the credit facility is accessed, rates of interest will
vary between Canadian prime, US base rate, LIBOR rate plus
75 basis points, or bankers acceptance rates plus
75 basis points. At December 31, 2004, none of this
facility was accessed (December 31, 2003
$8,300,000 was utilized with interest at 4.5%). The credit
facility agreement contains restrictive covenants, including,
but not limited to, debt to earnings ratio, earnings to debt
service ratio, current assets to current liabilities ratio and a
minimum shareholders equity. The Company is in compliance
with all covenants under this agreement as at December 31,
2004. All assets of the Company are held as collateral under a
general security agreement for the bank indebtedness and bank
loan [note 8].
Included in bank indebtedness at December 31, 2003 was
$6,930,000 related to an interim loan obtained to finance the
construction of the Edmonton office building. Interest,
calculated daily at Canadian prime plus 0.25% (2003
4.75%), was payable monthly. The loan was supported by a general
security agreement and a second mortgage. It was repaid during
2004 upon the sale of the Edmonton office building.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Non-interest bearing note payable
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
Other non-interest bearing notes payable
|
|
|
7,862 |
|
|
|
14,436 |
|
Bank loan
|
|
|
23,997 |
|
|
|
19,186 |
|
Mortgages payable
|
|
|
1,765 |
|
|
|
10,609 |
|
Other
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,975 |
|
|
|
44,575 |
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
12,820 |
|
|
|
13,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,155 |
|
|
|
31,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The non-interest bearing note payable is due November 1,
2027 in the amount of $933,000. The notes carrying value
of $111,000 is determined using a discount rate of 9.75%. If the
non-interest bearing note
F-13
payable were discounted at interest rates in effect at
December 31, 2004, the fair value of the note would be
$124,000 (2003 $124,000).
The carrying values of the other non-interest bearing notes
payable have been calculated using a weighted average rate of
interest of 5.80% and are supported by promissory notes. The
notes are due at various times from 2005 to 2007. The aggregate
maturity value of the notes is $8,336,000 (2003
$15,132,000). $47,000 (2003 $206,000) of the
notes carrying value is payable in US funds
(US $39,000; 2003 US $158,000). The
carrying value of these notes approximates their fair value
based on interest rates in effect at December 31, 2004.
The bank loan is due in equal quarterly principal payments of
US$1,562,000 (or Canadian-dollar equivalent) plus accrued
interest to October 1, 2008, and bears interest at LIBOR or
bankers acceptance rates plus 125 to 165 basis points. The
actual rate is dependent upon certain ratio calculations
determined on a quarterly basis. The interest rate applicable at
December 31, 2004, was 3.47% (2003 3.71%).
$21,997,000 (2003 $5,186,000) of the bank loan is
denominated in US dollars (US $18,300,000; 2003
US $4,000,000). Collateral and restrictive covenants for
the bank loan are described in note 7. The Company also
maintains a $17 million US dollar denominated acquisition
credit facility, which was unutilized at December 31, 2004
and 2003.
The mortgages payable bear interest at a weighted average rate
of 7.67%, are due in 2006, and are supported by first mortgages
against land and buildings. Monthly payments of principal and
interest are approximately $16,000.
Other long-term debt bears interest at a weighted average rate
of 5.84% and is due at dates ranging from 2005 to 2007. No
assets are pledged in support of this debt.
Principal repayments required on long-term debt in each of the
next five years and thereafter are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
|
12,820 |
|
2006
|
|
|
10,968 |
|
2007
|
|
|
8,617 |
|
2008
|
|
|
1,459 |
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
In 2004 net interest of $2,805,000 (2003
$2,637,000) was incurred. $2,219,000 (2003
$2,681,000) was incurred on the long-term debt. At
December 31, 2004, the Company had issued and outstanding
letters of credit totaling $1,702,000.
F-14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Provision for self-insured liabilities
|
|
|
5,236 |
|
|
|
2,410 |
|
Deferred gain on sale leaseback
|
|
|
7,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lease inducement benefits
|
|
|
4,742 |
|
|
|
1,902 |
|
Lease liabilities on exit activity
|
|
|
2,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,868 |
|
|
|
4,312 |
|
Less current portion included in accrued liabilities
|
|
|
3,050 |
|
|
|
2,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,818 |
|
|
|
1,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective August 1, 2003, the Company began self-insuring a
portion of its estimated liabilities which may arise in
connection with reported legal claims [note 11].
This provision is based on the results of an actuarial
review performed in 2004 with the current and long-term portion
determined based on the actuarial estimate provided. At
December 31, 2004, the long-term portion was $4,731,000.
Accrued charges of $0.9 million for lease liabilities
arising from downsizing or closing offices in existing
operations were incurred in 2004 with an additional
$3.5 million assumed in respect of acquisitions made during
the year. Payments of $1.4 million were made in 2004. The
impact of foreign currency changes on this accrual was a
reduction of $0.2 million.
Commitments for annual basic premises rent under long-term
leases and for equipment and vehicle operating leases for the
next five years are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
|
29,509 |
|
2006
|
|
|
26,551 |
|
2007
|
|
|
23,750 |
|
2008
|
|
|
17,952 |
|
2009
|
|
|
16,259 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
93,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
In the normal conduct of operations, various legal claims are
pending or may arise against the Company alleging, among other
things, breaches of contract or negligence in connection with
the performance of consulting services. The Company carries
professional liability insurance, subject to certain deductibles
and policy limits, and has a captive insurance company that
provides insurance protection against such claims. In some
cases, parties are seeking or may seek damages that
substantially exceed the Companys insurance coverage.
Based on advice and information provided by legal counsel, and
the Companys previous experience with the settlement of
similar claims, management believes that the Company has
recognized adequate provisions for probable and reasonably
estimable liabilities associated with these claims and that
their ultimate resolutions will not materially exceed insurance
coverages or have a material adverse effect on the
Companys consolidated financial position or annual results
of operations. Management cannot estimate the extent to which
losses exceeding those already recorded in the financial
statements may be incurred.
F-15
Authorized
|
|
|
Unlimited common shares, with no par value.
|
|
|
Unlimited preferred shares issuable in series with attributes
designated by the Board of Directors.
|
|
|
Common shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Stock | |
|
Contributed Surplus | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
# of Shares | |
|
$ | |
|
# of Shares | |
|
$ | |
|
# of Shares | |
|
$ | |
|
$ | |
|
$ | |
|
$ | |
(in thousands of dollars except share amounts) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance, beginning of the year
|
|
|
18,327,284 |
|
|
|
84,281 |
|
|
|
18,282,720 |
|
|
|
83,973 |
|
|
|
16,846,340 |
|
|
|
61,555 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
1,247 |
|
|
|
1,205 |
|
Share options exercised for cash
|
|
|
573,101 |
|
|
|
3,490 |
|
|
|
119,264 |
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
29,300 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares repurchased under normal course issuer bid
|
|
|
(29,300 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(74,700 |
) |
|
|
(343 |
) |
|
|
(54,600 |
) |
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Shares issued on acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261,680 |
|
|
|
3,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued under public offering, net of share issue costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
18,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of fair value of stock options previously
expensed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of the year
|
|
|
18,871,085 |
|
|
|
87,656 |
|
|
|
18,327,284 |
|
|
|
84,281 |
|
|
|
18,282,720 |
|
|
|
83,973 |
|
|
|
2,544 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
1,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2004, 29,300 common shares (2003 74,700) were
repurchased for cancellation pursuant to an ongoing normal
course issuer bid at a cost of $720,000 (2003
$1,392,000). Of this amount, $134,000 (2003
$343,000) and $4,000 (2003 $5,000) reduced the share
capital and contributed surplus accounts respectively, with
$582,000 (2003 $1,044,000) being charged to retained
earnings.
During 2004, the Company recognized a stock-based compensation
expense of $1,014,000 (2003 $706,000) in
administrative and marketing expenses. The amount relating to
the fair value of options granted ($725,000; 2003
$600,000) was reflected through contributed surplus, and the
amount relating to deferred share unit compensation ($289,000;
2003 $106,000) was reflected through accrued
liabilities, $120,000 of which was paid during 2004. Upon the
exercise of share options for which a stock-based compensation
expense has been recognized, the cash paid together with the
related portion of contributed surplus is credited to share
capital.
Share options
Under the Companys share option plan, options to purchase
common shares may be granted by the Board of Directors to
directors, officers, and employees. Options are granted at
exercise prices equal to or greater than fair market value at
the issue date, generally vest evenly over a three-year period,
and have contractual lives that range from five to
10 years. The aggregate number of common shares reserved
for issuance that may be purchased upon the exercise of options
granted pursuant to the plan shall not exceed 1,116,073 common
shares. At December 31, 2004, 44,740 options are available
for issue.
F-16
The Company has granted share options to directors, officers,
and employees to purchase 1,071,333 shares at prices
between $3.50 and $27.10 per share. These options expire on
dates between March 12, 2005, and January 2, 2013.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
|
Price | |
|
|
|
Price | |
|
|
|
Price | |
|
|
# of Shares | |
|
$ | |
|
# of Shares | |
|
$ | |
|
# of Shares | |
|
$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Share options, beginning of year
|
|
|
1,479,100 |
|
|
|
9.28 |
|
|
|
1,296,200 |
|
|
|
6.09 |
|
|
|
1,188,500 |
|
|
|
5.10 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
167,000 |
|
|
|
24.50 |
|
|
|
307,500 |
|
|
|
21.29 |
|
|
|
137,000 |
|
|
|
14.50 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(573,101 |
) |
|
|
6.09 |
|
|
|
(119,264 |
) |
|
|
5.46 |
|
|
|
(29,300 |
) |
|
|
5.04 |
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(1,666 |
) |
|
|
18.40 |
|
|
|
(5,336 |
) |
|
|
12.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share options, end of the year
|
|
|
1,071,333 |
|
|
|
13.34 |
|
|
|
1,479,100 |
|
|
|
9.28 |
|
|
|
1,296,200 |
|
|
|
6.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has issued options to directors, officers, and
employees at December 31, 2004, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
Options Exercisable | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
Range of | |
|
|
|
Remaining | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Contractual | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Shares | |
|
Exercise | |
Prices | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Life in | |
|
Price | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Price | |
$ | |
|
# | |
|
Years | |
|
$ | |
|
# | |
|
$ | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
3.50 - 3.60 |
|
|
|
373,000 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
3.56 |
|
|
|
373,000 |
|
|
|
3.56 |
|
|
5.20 - 7.00 |
|
|
|
108,100 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
6.07 |
|
|
|
108,100 |
|
|
|
6.07 |
|
|
14.50 - 18.85 |
|
|
|
176,733 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
15.51 |
|
|
|
107,822 |
|
|
|
14.95 |
|
|
21.00 - 27.10 |
|
|
|
413,500 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
23.14 |
|
|
|
52,167 |
|
|
|
21.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.50 - 27.10 |
|
|
|
1,071,333 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
13.34 |
|
|
|
641,089 |
|
|
|
7.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of options granted subsequent to January 1,
2002, is determined at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option valuation model
was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded
options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully
transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the
input of highly subjective assumptions, including expected stock
price volatility. Because the Companys employee stock
options have characteristics that are significantly different
from those of traded options, and because changes in subjective
input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate,
in managements opinion the existing models do not
necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value
of the Companys employee stock options.
The estimated fair value of options granted, both at the share
market price on the grant date and in excess of the share market
price on the grant date, was determined using the following
weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Granted at | |
|
Granted at | |
|
Granted in | |
|
Granted at | |
|
|
market | |
|
market | |
|
excess of market | |
|
market | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Risk-free interest rate (%)
|
|
|
4.07 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
|
|
|
4.35 |
|
Expected hold period to exercise (years)
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Volatility in the price of the Companys shares (%)
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Weighted average fair value per option
|
|
|
8.46 |
|
|
|
7.40 |
|
|
|
6.04 |
|
|
|
4.19 |
|
F-17
|
|
13. |
CUMULATIVE TRANSLATION ACCOUNT |
The foreign currency cumulative translation account represents
the unrealized gain or loss on the Companys net investment
in self-sustaining US based operations. The change in the
cumulative translation account during the year relates to the
fluctuation in the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the
US dollar. Balance sheet accounts denominated in US dollars have
been translated to Canadian dollars at the rate of 1.2020
(2003 1.2965; 2002 1.5776).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cumulative translation account, beginning of year
|
|
|
(13,861 |
) |
|
|
1,966 |
|
|
|
2,807 |
|
Current year deferred translation adjustment
|
|
|
(5,157 |
) |
|
|
(15,827 |
) |
|
|
(841 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative translation account, end of year
|
|
|
(19,018 |
) |
|
|
(13,861 |
) |
|
|
1,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effective income tax rate in the consolidated statements of
income differs from statutory Canadian tax rates as a result of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
% | |
|
% | |
|
% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Income tax expense at statutory Canadian rates
|
|
|
34.7 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
39.3 |
|
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (income) from associated companies accounted for on the
equity basis
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
Rate differential on foreign income
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
Non-deductible expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meals and entertainment
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-taxable foreign income net of non-creditable withholding
taxes
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
|
36.7 |
|
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant components of the Companys future income tax
assets and liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
$ | |
|
$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Future income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Differences in timing of deductibility of expenses
|
|
|
9,434 |
|
|
|
6,060 |
|
Loss carryforwards
|
|
|
2,316 |
|
|
|
2,051 |
|
Share issue and other financing costs
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
Tax cost of property and equipment in excess of carrying value
|
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
Deferred gain on sale of building
|
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,889 |
|
|
|
9,411 |
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
8,532 |
|
|
|
5,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,357 |
|
|
|
3,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Future income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash to accrual adjustments on acquisition of US subsidiaries
|
|
|
2,091 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
Differences in timing of taxability of revenues
|
|
|
7,702 |
|
|
|
9,955 |
|
Carrying value of property and equipment in excess of tax cost
|
|
|
5,025 |
|
|
|
2,970 |
|
Carrying value of intangible assets in excess of tax cost
|
|
|
2,016 |
|
|
|
1,996 |
|
Other
|
|
|
2,135 |
|
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,969 |
|
|
|
17,184 |
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
10,653 |
|
|
|
10,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,316 |
|
|
|
6,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004, loss carryforwards of approximately
$3,516,000 are available to reduce the taxable income of certain
Canadian subsidiaries. These losses expire as set out below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
2006
|
|
|
22 |
|
2007
|
|
|
325 |
|
2008
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
2009
|
|
|
66 |
|
2010
|
|
|
636 |
|
2014
|
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, the Company has loss carryforwards of approximately
$3,795,000 available to reduce the taxable income of certain US
subsidiaries that expire at varying times over the next
20 years.
The potential income tax benefits that will result from the
application of Canadian and US tax losses have been recognized
in these financial statements.
The number of basic and diluted common shares outstanding, as
calculated on a weighted average basis, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
# | |
|
# | |
|
# | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
18,499,598 |
|
|
|
18,329,960 |
|
|
|
17,987,358 |
|
Share options (dilutive effect of 1,041,333 options;
2003 1,419,100; 2002 1,296,200)
|
|
|
507,691 |
|
|
|
788,056 |
|
|
|
812,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
19,007,289 |
|
|
|
19,118,016 |
|
|
|
18,799,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-19
|
|
16. |
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
Cash flows from operating activities determined by the indirect
method are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the year
|
|
|
30,190 |
|
|
|
25,070 |
|
|
|
20,192 |
|
Add (deduct) items not affecting cash:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of property and equipment
|
|
|
11,986 |
|
|
|
9,912 |
|
|
|
9,502 |
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
Future income tax
|
|
|
(3,595 |
) |
|
|
4,508 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
Loss on dispositions of investments and property and equipment
|
|
|
(504 |
) |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
894 |
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
Share of income from equity investments
|
|
|
(385 |
) |
|
|
(580 |
) |
|
|
(355 |
) |
Dividends from equity investments
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,813 |
|
|
|
40,598 |
|
|
|
30,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in non-cash working capital accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(1,542 |
) |
|
|
(1,252 |
) |
|
|
8,174 |
|
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings
|
|
|
30,218 |
|
|
|
(35,239 |
) |
|
|
(4,673 |
) |
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(4,589 |
) |
|
|
13,944 |
|
|
|
4,576 |
|
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
4,951 |
|
|
|
(2,147 |
) |
|
Income taxes payable/recoverable
|
|
|
11,355 |
|
|
|
(6,222 |
) |
|
|
(531 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,538 |
|
|
|
(23,705 |
) |
|
|
5,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
77,351 |
|
|
|
16,893 |
|
|
|
36,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid during the year in accordance with US GAAP
|
|
|
10,530 |
|
|
|
18,142 |
|
|
|
14,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company participates in joint ventures with other parties as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Owned | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
% | |
|
% | |
|
% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
yyC.T. Joint Venture
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Lockerbie Stanley Inc.
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Stantec S&L Partnership
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Colt Stantec Joint Venture
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Edmonton International Airports Joint Venture
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Pine Creek Consultants Joint Venture
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Dunlop Joint Ventures
|
|
|
33-80 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
As part of the acquisition of Dunlop Architects Inc. (Dunlop),
the Company acquired the interests of 13 joint ventures entered
into by Dunlop. The interest held in these joint ventures ranges
from 33 to 80%, and each is project specific.
F-20
A summary of the assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and
cash flows included in the consolidated financial statements
related to joint ventures is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Statements of income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenue
|
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
11,949 |
|
|
|
11,174 |
|
Subconsultant and other direct expenses
|
|
|
894 |
|
|
|
9,611 |
|
|
|
12,529 |
|
Administrative and marketing expenses
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the year
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
|
(1,632 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
3,445 |
|
|
|
1,547 |
|
|
|
4,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
2,822 |
|
|
|
1,583 |
|
|
|
5,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in operating activities
|
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18. |
SEGMENTED INFORMATION |
The Company provides comprehensive professional services in the
area of infrastructure and facilities throughout North America
and internationally. The Company considers the basis on which it
is organized, including geographic areas and service offerings,
in identifying its reportable segments. Operating segments of
the Company are defined as components of the Company for which
separate financial information is available that is evaluated
regularly by the chief operating decision maker in allocating
resources and assessing performance. The chief operating
decision maker is the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and the
Companys operating segments are based on its geographical
regional areas.
During 2003, the Company had seven operating segments, of which
five were aggregated into the Consulting Services reportable
segment. The two remaining operating segments (Design Build and
Technology), which were below the quantitative thresholds in the
recommendations of the Canadian Institute of Chartered
Accountants, were disclosed in the Other reportable segment. In
addition to the above-noted operating segments, corporate
administration groups reported to the CEO and were included in
the Other reportable segment. In the second quarter of 2004, an
additional operating segment was added upon the acquisition of
The Sear-Brown Group, Inc. This new segment has been aggregated
into the Consulting Services reportable segment.
The Design Build operating segment consisted of the operations
of the Companys 50% share of Lockerbie Stanley Inc. that,
at December 31, 2003, was reflected as assets held for sale
pending the finalization of an agreement to sell the
Companys interest. The sale was completed in 2004. In
addition, during 2004, the Company sold the operations related
to its Technology segment. Operations sold during the year have
not been presented as discontinued operations, because the
amounts are not material.
Effective 2004, because the operations that comprised the
Companys Design Build and Technology segments were sold
and because the Companys corporate administration groups
are not material, all operations of the Company are included in
one reportable segment as Consulting Services.
F-21
Geographic information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and | |
|
|
|
Property and | |
|
|
|
Property and | |
|
|
|
|
Equipment, | |
|
|
|
Equipment, | |
|
|
|
Equipment, | |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill, | |
|
|
|
Goodwill, | |
|
|
|
Goodwill, | |
|
|
Gross | |
|
Intangible | |
|
Gross | |
|
Intangible | |
|
Gross | |
|
Intangible | |
|
|
Revenues | |
|
Assets | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Assets | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Assets | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Canada
|
|
|
325,844 |
|
|
|
86,731 |
|
|
|
290,413 |
|
|
|
104,088 |
|
|
|
238,774 |
|
|
|
76,882 |
|
United States
|
|
|
190,362 |
|
|
|
52,032 |
|
|
|
161,655 |
|
|
|
37,815 |
|
|
|
180,296 |
|
|
|
51,509 |
|
International
|
|
|
4,673 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
7,874 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
9,386 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
520,879 |
|
|
|
139,234 |
|
|
|
459,942 |
|
|
|
142,478 |
|
|
|
428,456 |
|
|
|
128,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenue is attributed to countries based on the location
of work performed.
Practice area information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Revenues | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Consulting Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environment
|
|
|
105,471 |
|
|
|
91,758 |
|
|
|
74,130 |
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
107,465 |
|
|
|
89,943 |
|
|
|
77,269 |
|
|
Transportation
|
|
|
92,631 |
|
|
|
80,519 |
|
|
|
80,577 |
|
|
Urban Land
|
|
|
168,876 |
|
|
|
159,941 |
|
|
|
156,888 |
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
45,371 |
|
|
|
33,304 |
|
|
|
35,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
519,814 |
|
|
|
455,465 |
|
|
|
423,885 |
|
Other
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
4,477 |
|
|
|
4,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
520,879 |
|
|
|
459,942 |
|
|
|
428,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers
The Company has a large number of clients in various industries
and sectors of the economy. Gross revenue is not concentrated in
any particular client.
At December 31, 2004, the Company had entered into foreign
currency forward contracts that are not accounted for as hedges.
These arrangements provided for the sale of US$10.0 million
at rates ranging from 1.2050 to 1.2386 per US dollar.
The fair values of these contracts, estimated using market rates
at December 31, 2004, are $229,000 (2003 nil).
During the year, net unrealized gains of $229,000
(2003 nil) relating to derivative financial
instruments were recorded in foreign exchanges
(gains) losses.
Subsequent to the year-end, the Company entered into an
agreement to acquire the shares and business of The Keith
Companies, Inc. for a combination of cash consideration and
Stantec common shares. This transaction is subject to customary
conditions, including approval by The Keith Companies, Inc.
shareholders. In conjunction with the transaction, the Company
has applied to become a US Securities and Exchange Commission
registrant and to have the Companys common shares listed
on the New York Stock Exchange, in addition to the existing
Toronto Stock Exchange listing. The estimated total
consideration, excluding transaction costs, is expected to be
comprised of approximately 3.9 million common shares valued
at US$91.5 million and cash consideration of approximately
US$90.4 million. The estimated cash consideration will be
financed through the utilization of the Companys existing
cash and available credit facilities as well as the use of part
of The Keith Companies, Inc. cash. The portion of The Keith
Companies, Inc. cash that
F-22
can be used to finance the transaction is subject to
restrictions outlined in the merger agreement. These
restrictions may require the Company to continue to hold a
portion of The Keith Companies, Inc. cash and to obtain
additional credit to finance the cash holdings. The transaction
is expected to close during the third quarter of 2005.
|
|
21. |
UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES |
The consolidated financial statements of the Company are
prepared in Canadian dollars in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in Canada (Canadian
GAAP) that in most respects, conform to accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States (US
GAAP). The following adjustments and disclosures would be
required in order to present these consolidated financial
statements in accordance with US GAAP. Investments in joint
ventures are accounted for using the equity method under US GAAP
while Canadian GAAP requires the proportionate consolidation
method. As permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission,
no disclosure is required of the effect of this difference.
|
|
a. |
Net income and comprehensive income |
There are no identifiable material items that would result in a
change in net income presented under Canadian or US GAAP.
The Company accounts for leases in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, Accounting for
leases (SFAS 13). SFAS 13 requires leasehold
improvements in an operating lease to be amortized over the
shorter of their economic lives or the lease term, as defined in
SFAS 13. As a result, SFAS 13 requires the
amortization period for leasehold improvements to be shorter
than applied by the Company under Canadian GAAP. The incremental
amortization was determined to be immaterial to the periods
presented.
Comprehensive income is measured in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, Reporting
Comprehensive Income (SFAS 130). This standard
defines comprehensive income as all changes in equity other than
those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to
owners and includes adjustments arising on the translation of
the self-sustaining foreign operations. Canadian GAAP does not
yet require similar disclosure.
Statement of Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net income under Canadian and US GAAP
|
|
|
30,190 |
|
|
|
25,070 |
|
|
|
20,192 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized foreign exchange loss on translation of
self-sustaining foreign operations
|
|
|
(5,157 |
) |
|
|
(15,827 |
) |
|
|
(841 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
25,033 |
|
|
|
9,243 |
|
|
|
19,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, beginning of year
|
|
|
(13,861 |
) |
|
|
1,966 |
|
|
|
2,807 |
|
Unrealized foreign exchange loss on translation of
self-sustaining foreign operations
|
|
|
(5,157 |
) |
|
|
(15,827 |
) |
|
|
(841 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, end of year
|
|
|
(19,018 |
) |
|
|
(13,861 |
) |
|
|
1,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23
|
|
b. |
Other disclosures required |
|
|
|
i) Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Trade accounts payable
|
|
|
21,651 |
|
|
|
17,806 |
|
Employee and payroll liabilities
|
|
|
37,188 |
|
|
|
31,276 |
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
19,879 |
|
|
|
19,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,718 |
|
|
|
68,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ii) Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
|
16,952 |
|
|
|
17,316 |
|
|
|
15,755 |
|
Acquired balances
|
|
|
5,294 |
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
2,616 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
6,632 |
|
|
|
4,544 |
|
|
|
3,512 |
|
Deductions
|
|
|
(7,152 |
) |
|
|
(4,221 |
) |
|
|
(4,453 |
) |
Impact of foreign exchange
|
|
|
(631 |
) |
|
|
(1,338 |
) |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
|
21,095 |
|
|
|
16,952 |
|
|
|
17,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iii) Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Domestic
|
|
|
48,111 |
|
|
|
36,583 |
|
|
|
37,548 |
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(3,451 |
) |
|
|
3,045 |
|
|
|
(4,453 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
44,660 |
|
|
|
39,628 |
|
|
|
33,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
17,724 |
|
|
|
9,474 |
|
|
|
13,968 |
|
Foreign
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
(1,019 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
18,065 |
|
|
|
10,050 |
|
|
|
12,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
(566 |
) |
|
|
3,532 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(3,029 |
) |
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
(516 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(3,595 |
) |
|
|
4,508 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
17,158 |
|
|
|
13,006 |
|
|
|
14,438 |
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(2,688 |
) |
|
|
1,552 |
|
|
|
(1,535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
14,470 |
|
|
|
14,558 |
|
|
|
12,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
|
|
|
v) Self-insured liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
|
2,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current year provision
|
|
|
2,826 |
|
|
|
2,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
|
5,236 |
|
|
|
2,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The self-insured liability increased during 2004 primarily due
to new claims incurred and reported since the end of fiscal
2003. No claim settlement payments were made during 2004 or
2003. The timing of such settlement payments, if required, is
dependent upon the resolution of case-specific matters and may
extend over several months.
Included in accounts receivable are holdbacks on long-term
contracts of $3,653,000 in 2004 and $2,496,000 in 2003.
|
|
c. |
Effects of new accounting pronouncements |
The Company is not aware of any new US accounting pronouncements
that will impact its financial reporting.
The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants has issued three
new accounting standards that will affect the Company. These new
standards align Canadian GAAP to US GAAP. Accordingly,
information currently presented in the Companys
reconciliation note will be incorporated into the Companys
financial statements.
|
|
|
i) Comprehensive Income New section 1530
becomes effective for our fiscal 2007 year end and
establishes standards for the reporting and display of
comprehensive income. Unrealized gains on the translation of our
self-sustaining foreign operations will be included in
comprehensive income. Currently these items are reflected in our
cumulative translation account. |
|
|
ii) Financial Instruments Recognition and
Measurement New section 3855 becomes effective
for our fiscal 2007 year end and provides standards for the
classification of financial instruments and the related
interest, dividends, gains and losses. This section will impact
the classification of the Companys investments held for
self-insured liabilities and will require the company to revalue
certain investments to fair value with the resulting unrealized
gains or losses being reflected through other comprehensive
income until realized when the gains or losses will be
recognized in net income. This new standard is not expected to
have a material effect on the results of operations. |
|
|
iii) Variable Interest Entities Accounting
Guideline 15 is effective for our interim period ending
March 31, 2005. As the Company currently consolidates its
interests in variable entities, there will be no impact on the
financial reporting of the Company other than to amend a policy
note principles of consolidation to include the
consolidation of variable interest entities. |
Certain comparative figures have been reclassified to conform to
the presentation adopted for the current year. On the statement
of cash flow, the change in bank indebtedness has been reflected
as a financing activity rather than being included in the
balance of cash and cash equivalents.
F-25
STANTEC INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 | |
|
December 31 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
$ | |
|
$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands of | |
|
|
Canadian dollars) | |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
31,684 |
|
|
|
37,890 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$11,930 in 2005
($21,095 2004) (note 2)
|
|
|
114,877 |
|
|
|
112,476 |
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings
|
|
|
41,692 |
|
|
|
40,861 |
|
Income taxes recoverable
|
|
|
2,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
3,440 |
|
|
|
4,165 |
|
Future income tax assets
|
|
|
6,829 |
|
|
|
8,532 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
5,113 |
|
|
|
4,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,443 |
|
|
|
208,755 |
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
50,191 |
|
|
|
48,262 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
86,086 |
|
|
|
84,694 |
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
5,876 |
|
|
|
6,278 |
|
Future income tax assets
|
|
|
5,655 |
|
|
|
6,357 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
10,363 |
|
|
|
7,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
364,614 |
|
|
|
362,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
71,753 |
|
|
|
78,718 |
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings
|
|
|
17,205 |
|
|
|
18,832 |
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,732 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt (note 4)
|
|
|
9,182 |
|
|
|
12,820 |
|
Future income tax liabilities
|
|
|
10,061 |
|
|
|
10,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,201 |
|
|
|
126,755 |
|
Long-term debt (note 4)
|
|
|
17,825 |
|
|
|
21,155 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
19,404 |
|
|
|
16,818 |
|
Future income tax liabilities
|
|
|
8,280 |
|
|
|
8,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,710 |
|
|
|
173,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital (note 5)
|
|
|
88,218 |
|
|
|
87,656 |
|
Contributed surplus (note 5)
|
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
|
2,544 |
|
Cumulative translation account
|
|
|
(17,816 |
) |
|
|
(19,018 |
) |
Retained earnings
|
|
|
137,514 |
|
|
|
117,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,904 |
|
|
|
189,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
364,614 |
|
|
|
362,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
F-26
STANTEC INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND RETAINED
EARNINGS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the two quarters ended | |
|
|
June 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
$ | |
|
$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands of | |
|
|
Canadian dollars except | |
|
|
per share amounts) | |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenue
|
|
|
291,308 |
|
|
|
254,132 |
|
Less subconsultant and other direct expenses
|
|
|
44,518 |
|
|
|
31,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
|
246,790 |
|
|
|
222,276 |
|
Direct payroll costs
|
|
|
109,391 |
|
|
|
102,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
137,399 |
|
|
|
119,511 |
|
Administrative and marketing expenses (note 2)
|
|
|
100,712 |
|
|
|
93,117 |
|
Depreciation of property and equipment
|
|
|
5,684 |
|
|
|
5,612 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
Net interest expense (note 4)
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
1,499 |
|
Foreign exchange losses (gains)
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
Share of income from associated companies
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
30,462 |
|
|
|
18,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
8,897 |
|
|
|
7,057 |
|
Future
|
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
|
(249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,661 |
|
|
|
6,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the period
|
|
|
19,801 |
|
|
|
12,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings, beginning of period
|
|
|
117,874 |
|
|
|
88,266 |
|
Net income for the period
|
|
|
19,801 |
|
|
|
12,103 |
|
Shares repurchased (note 5)
|
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(442 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings, end of period
|
|
|
137,514 |
|
|
|
99,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
18,936,538 |
|
|
|
18,425,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
19,434,844 |
|
|
|
19,230,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding, end of period
|
|
|
18,949,286 |
|
|
|
18,476,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
F-27
STANTEC INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the | |
|
|
two quarters ended | |
|
|
June 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
$ | |
|
$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands of | |
|
|
Canadian dollars) | |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash receipts from clients
|
|
|
300,122 |
|
|
|
268.043 |
|
Cash paid to suppliers
|
|
|
(94,262 |
) |
|
|
(85,766 |
) |
Cash paid to employees
|
|
|
(176,077 |
) |
|
|
(164,446 |
) |
Dividends from equity investments
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
Interest received
|
|
|
2,716 |
|
|
|
3,495 |
|
Interest paid
|
|
|
(2,778 |
) |
|
|
(4,736 |
) |
Income tax refunds received (taxes paid)
|
|
|
(17,438 |
) |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
12,533 |
|
|
|
16,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business acquisitions, including cash acquired and bank
indebtedness
assumed (note 3)
|
|
|
(692 |
) |
|
|
(14,270 |
) |
Purchase of investments held for self-insured liabilities
|
|
|
(3,376 |
) |
|
|
(5,963 |
) |
Proceeds on disposition of investments
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Collection of note receivable from disposition of Technology
segment
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(8,105 |
) |
|
|
(7,932 |
) |
Proceeds on disposition of property and equipment
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities
|
|
|
(11,280 |
) |
|
|
(27,852 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(8,001 |
) |
|
|
(12,109 |
) |
Proceeds from long-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,960 |
|
Net change in bank indebtedness financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,061 |
|
Repurchase of shares for cancellation (note 5)
|
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
(545 |
) |
Proceeds from issue of share capital (note 5)
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(7,661 |
) |
|
|
19,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange gain on cash held in foreign currency
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
(6,206 |
) |
|
|
7,545 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
37,890 |
|
|
|
7,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
|
31,684 |
|
|
|
14,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
F-28
STANTEC INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. GENERAL ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have
been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted
accounting principles on a basis consistent with those used in
the preparation of the annual December 31, 2004,
consolidated financial statements. Because the disclosures
included in these interim consolidated financial statements do
not conform in all respects to the requirements of generally
accepted accounting principles for annual financial statements,
these interim consolidated financial statements should be read
in conjunction with the December 31, 2004, annual
consolidated financial statements. In managements opinion,
these interim consolidated financial statements include all the
adjustments necessary to present fairly such interim
consolidated financial statements. The consolidated statements
of income and retained earnings and cash flows for interim
periods are not necessarily indicative of results on an annual
basis due to short-term variations as well as the timing of
acquisitions, if any, during interim periods.
Principles of Consolidation
Effective January 1, 2005, the Company adopted Accounting
Guideline 15 Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities. These consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries that
are not considered to be variable interest entities (VIEs) and
all VIEs for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated. The adoption of this accounting guideline has not
had an impact on these interim consolidated financial statements.
2. CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING
ESTIMATE
During the second quarter of 2005, management revised its
estimate for the allowance for doubtful accounts. The revision
was based on improved information available on historical loss
experience and has been applied prospectively. By their nature,
these estimates are subject to measurement uncertainty and the
effect on the consolidated financial statements of changes in
such estimates could be significant. The impact of this change
during the second quarter was a $4,000,000 reduction of
administrative and marketing expenses.
3. BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS
Acquisitions are accounted for under the purchase method of
accounting, and the results of earnings since the respective
dates of acquisition are included in the consolidated statements
of income. The purchase prices of acquisitions are generally
subject to price adjustment clauses included in the purchase
agreements. From time to time, as a result of the timing of
acquisitions in relation to the Companys reporting
schedule, certain of the purchase price allocations may not be
finalized at the initial time of reporting. In the case of some
acquisitions, the additional consideration payable based on
future performance parameters may be adjusted upward or
downward. As at June 30, 2005, the maximum contingent
consideration that may be payable in 2005 and future years is
approximately $9,000. Such additional consideration is recorded
as additional goodwill in the period in which the consideration
to be paid is confirmed.
During the first two quarters of 2005, the Company paid
additional contingent consideration in connection with the
Cosburn Patterson Mather Limited (2002) acquisition and
adjusted the purchase price on the Ecological Services Group
Inc. (2003), GBR Architects Limited (2004), and Dunlop
Architects Inc. (2004) acquisitions pursuant to price adjustment
clauses included in the purchase agreements.
During the first two quarters of 2004, the Company acquired the
shares and businesses of The Sear-Brown Group, Inc.
(April 2, 2004) and GBR Architects Limited (May 31,
2004) and reduced the purchase price in connection with the
Cosburn Patterson Mather Limited (2002), The Spink Corporation
(2001), the
F-29
APAI Architecture Inc. (2003), and the Ecological Services Group
Inc. (2003) acquisitions pursuant to price adjustment clauses in
the purchase agreements.
Details of the aggregate consideration given and of the fair
values of net assets acquired or adjusted for in the first two
quarters of each years are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
$ | |
|
$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands of | |
|
|
Canadian dollars) | |
Cash consideration
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
8,811 |
|
Promissory notes, due 2004 through 2007
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
9,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and liabilities acquired at fair values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash acquired (bank indebtedness assumed)
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(5,459 |
) |
|
Non-cash working capital
|
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
3,134 |
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
2,649 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
14,033 |
|
|
Intangibles assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,045 |
|
|
|
Contract backlog
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,073 |
) |
|
Future income taxes
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(387 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
9,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of the goodwill is non-deductible for income tax purposes.
4. LONG-TERM DEBT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 | |
|
December 31 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
$ | |
|
$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands of | |
|
|
Canadian dollars) | |
Non-interest-bearing note payable
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
Other non-interest-bearing notes payable
|
|
|
3,555 |
|
|
|
7,862 |
|
Bank loan
|
|
|
21,444 |
|
|
|
23,997 |
|
Mortgages payable
|
|
|
1,736 |
|
|
|
1,765 |
|
Other
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,007 |
|
|
|
33,975 |
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
9,182 |
|
|
|
12,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,825 |
|
|
|
21,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has a revolving credit facility in the amount of
$30 million to support general business operations. None of
this facility was accessed at June 30, 2005, or
December 31, 2004. All assets of the Company are held as
collateral under a general security agreement for the bank loan
and bank indebtedness. The mortgages payable are supported by
first mortgages against land and buildings.
The interest expense on long-term debt in the first two quarters
of 2005 was $718,000 (2004 $1,199,000).
F-30
5. SHARE CAPITAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Stock | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributed | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Surplus | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Common | |
|
|
|
Common | |
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
# | |
|
$ | |
|
# | |
|
$ | |
|
$ | |
|
$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands of Canadian dollars) | |
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
|
18,871,085 |
|
|
|
87,656 |
|
|
|
18,327,284 |
|
|
|
84,281 |
|
|
|
2,544 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
Share options exercised for cash
|
|
|
64,834 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
155,434 |
|
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
Shares repurchased under normal course issuer bid
|
|
|
(2,900 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(17,900 |
) |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Reclassification of fair value of stock options previously
expensed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, as at March 31
|
|
|
18,933,019 |
|
|
|
88,138 |
|
|
|
18,464,818 |
|
|
|
85,053 |
|
|
|
2,740 |
|
|
|
2,019 |
|
|
Share options exercised for cash
|
|
|
20,167 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
15,500 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
Shares repurchased under normal course issuer bid
|
|
|
(3,900 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Reclassification of fair value of stock options previously
expensed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, as at June 30
|
|
|
18,949,286 |
|
|
|
88,218 |
|
|
|
18,476,318 |
|
|
|
85,113 |
|
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
|
2,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2005, 6,800 common shares (2004 21,900) were
repurchased for cancellation pursuant to an ongoing normal
course issuer bid at a cost of $195,000 (2004
$545,000). Of this amount, $33,000 and $1,000 (2004
$101,000 and $2,000) reduced the share capital and contributed
surplus accounts respectively, with $161,000 (2004
$442,000) being charged to retained earnings.
During 2005, the Company recognized a stock-based compensation
expense of $683,000 (2004 $504,000) in
administrative and marketing expenses. The amount relating to
the fair value of the options granted ($505,000;
2004 $354,000) was reflected through contributed
surplus, and the amount relating to deferred share unit
compensation ($178,000; 2004 $150,000) was reflected
through accrued liabilities. Upon the exercise of share options
for which a stock-based compensation expense has been
recognized, the cash paid together with the related portion of
contributed surplus is credited to share capital.
6. SEGMENTED INFORMATION
The Company provides comprehensive professional services in the
area of infrastructure and facilities. The Company considers the
basis on which it is organized, including geographic areas and
service offerings, in identifying its reportable segments.
Operating segments of the Company are defined as components of
the Company for which separate financial information is
available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating
decision maker in allocating resources and assessing
performance. The chief operating decision maker is the Chief
Executive Officer of the Company and the Companys
operating segments are based on its geographical regional areas.
All operations of the Company are included in one reportable
segment as Consulting Services, which provides services
throughout North America and internationally.
F-31
Geographic information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Property and | |
|
Property and | |
|
|
Equipment, | |
|
Equipment, | |
|
|
Goodwill, | |
|
Goodwill, | |
|
|
Intangible | |
|
Intangible | |
|
|
Assets | |
|
Assets | |
|
|
$ | |
|
$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands of Canadian dollars) | |
Canada
|
|
|
89,389 |
|
|
|
86,731 |
|
United States
|
|
|
52,300 |
|
|
|
52,032 |
|
International
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,153 |
|
|
|
139,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the two quarters | |
|
|
ended | |
|
|
June 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Gross | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
|
$ | |
|
$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands of | |
|
|
Canadian dollars) | |
Canada
|
|
|
183,322 |
|
|
|
157,425 |
|
United States
|
|
|
106,104 |
|
|
|
93,606 |
|
International
|
|
|
1,882 |
|
|
|
3,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291,308 |
|
|
|
254,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Practice area information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the two quarters | |
|
|
ended | |
|
|
June 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Gross | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
|
$ | |
|
$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands of | |
|
|
Canadian dollars) | |
Consulting services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environment
|
|
|
50,117 |
|
|
|
54,812 |
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
77,848 |
|
|
|
51,702 |
|
|
Transportation
|
|
|
45,547 |
|
|
|
43,100 |
|
|
Urban land
|
|
|
91,352 |
|
|
|
83,917 |
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
26,444 |
|
|
|
20,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291,308 |
|
|
|
253,580 |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
291,308 |
|
|
|
254,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. EMPLOYEE FUTURE BENEFITS
The Company contributes to group retirement savings plans and an
employee share purchase plan based on the amount of employee
contributions subject to maximum limits per employee. The
Company accounts
F-32
for such contributions as an expense in the period in which they
are incurred. The expense recorded in the first
two quarters of 2005 $4,071,000 (2004
$3,788,000).
8. CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Cash flows from operating activities determined by the indirect
method are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the two quarters | |
|
|
ended | |
|
|
June 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
$ | |
|
$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands of | |
|
|
Canadian dollars) | |
Net income for the period
|
|
|
19,801 |
|
|
|
12,103 |
|
Add (deduct) items not affecting cash:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of property and equipment
|
|
|
5,684 |
|
|
|
5,612 |
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
Future income tax
|
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
|
(249 |
) |
|
Loss on dispositions of investments and property and equipment
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts (note 2)
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for self-insured liabilities
|
|
|
3,449 |
|
|
|
2,881 |
|
|
Other non-cash items
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
Share of income from equity investments
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(206 |
) |
Dividends from equity investments
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,542 |
|
|
|
21,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in non-cash working capital accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
2,447 |
|
|
|
(14,136 |
) |
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings
|
|
|
(924 |
) |
|
|
16,239 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(8,022 |
) |
|
|
(13,503 |
) |
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings
|
|
|
(1,705 |
) |
|
|
(971 |
) |
|
Income taxes payable/ recoverable
|
|
|
(8,553 |
) |
|
|
6,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,009 |
) |
|
|
(5,524 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
12,533 |
|
|
|
16,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. PENDING ACQUISITIONS
During the second quarter of 2005, the Company entered into an
agreement to acquire the shares and business of The Keith
Companies, Inc. for a combination of cash consideration and
Stantec common shares. This transaction is subject to customary
conditions, including approval by The Keith Companies, Inc.
shareholders. In conjunction with the transaction, the Company
has applied to become a US Securities and Exchange Commission
registrant and to have its common shares listed on the New York
Stock Exchange in addition to its existing Toronto Stock
Exchange listing. The estimated total consideration, excluding
transaction costs, is expected to consist of approximately
3.9 million common shares valued at US$91.5 million
and cash consideration of approximately US$90.4 million.
The estimated cash consideration will be financed through
utilization of the Companys existing cash and available
credit facilities as well as use of part of The Keith Companies,
Inc.s cash. The portion of The Keith Companies,
Inc.s cash that can be used to finance the transaction is
subject to restrictions outlined in the merger agreement. These
F-33
restrictions may require the Company to continue to hold a
portion of The Keith Companies, Inc.s cash and to obtain
additional credit to finance these cash holdings. The
transaction is expected to close during the third quarter of
2005.
During the second quarter, the Company entered into an agreement
to acquire the shares and business of CPV Group
Architects & Engineers Ltd. for cash consideration of
$3.6 million. The transaction is expected to close during
the third quarter of 2005.
10. COMPARATIVE FIGURES
Certain comparative figures have been reclassified to conform to
the presentation adopted for the current year.
F-34
STANTEC INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars and have
been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, based on the
historical financial statements of Stantec and Keith, as at
June 30, 2005 and for the six months ended June 30,
2005 and for the year ended December 31, 2004, adjusted to
give effect to the acquisition of Keith by Stantec.
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements were prepared to illustrate the estimated effects of
the acquisition. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
balance sheet gives effect to the acquisition as if the
acquisition had occurred as of June 30, 2005. The unaudited
pro forma condensed consolidated statement of income for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 and for the year ended
December 31, 2004 gives effect to the acquisition as if the
acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2004. The pro
forma adjustments are described in the accompanying notes. The
unaudited pro forma adjustments are based upon available
information and certain assumptions that management of Stantec
believes are reasonable. The unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated financial statements do not purport to represent
Stantecs results of operations or financial condition for
any future period or as of any date. The unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with Stantecs consolidated financial
statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations which are
included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus.
The acquisition will be accounted for using the purchase method.
Under the purchase method, the total purchase price will be
allocated to the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities
of Keith based upon their respective fair values as of the
closing of the acquisition based on valuations which are not yet
available. A preliminary allocation of the purchase price has
been made to the major categories of assets and liabilities in
the accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial information based on estimates. The actual allocation
of purchase price and the resulting effect on income from
continuing operations may differ materially from the unaudited
pro forma amounts included herein.
F-35
STANTEC INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
As at June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Stantec | |
|
Keith | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
US GAAP | |
|
US GAAP | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
US GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(note 2) | |
|
(note 3) | |
|
|
|
(note 4) | |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of Canadian dollars) | |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
31,684 |
|
|
$ |
53,823 |
|
|
$ |
(2,637 |
) |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,550 |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(109,234 |
) |
|
|
(d) |
|
|
$ |
51,186 |
|
Available for sale securities
|
|
|
5,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,113 |
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
114,877 |
|
|
|
20,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,394 |
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings
|
|
|
41,692 |
|
|
|
15,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,614 |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
13,077 |
|
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
206,443 |
|
|
|
91,824 |
|
|
|
(34,321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
263,946 |
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
50,191 |
|
|
|
5,686 |
|
|
|
(692 |
) |
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
55,185 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
86,086 |
|
|
|
28,256 |
|
|
|
(28,256 |
) |
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,986 |
|
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
240,072 |
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
5,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,451 |
|
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
19,327 |
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
16,018 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
(e) |
|
|
|
17,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
364,614 |
|
|
|
126,657 |
|
|
|
104,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
596,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank indebtedness
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,550 |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
|
|
77,550 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
71,753 |
|
|
|
15,143 |
|
|
|
3,669 |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,540 |
|
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,691 |
|
|
|
(e) |
|
|
|
102,562 |
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
36,448 |
|
|
|
4,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
108,201 |
|
|
|
19,301 |
|
|
|
93,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220,718 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
17,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,825 |
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
27,684 |
|
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
4,818 |
|
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
34,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
153,710 |
|
|
|
21,310 |
|
|
|
98,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
273,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital
|
|
|
88,218 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,099 |
) |
|
|
(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,418 |
|
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
202,537 |
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
|
60,143 |
|
|
|
(3,669 |
) |
|
|
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,474 |
) |
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
2,988 |
|
Deferred stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,611 |
) |
|
|
(635 |
) |
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
(2,246 |
) |
Retained earnings
|
|
|
137,514 |
|
|
|
46,805 |
|
|
|
(2,637 |
) |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,168 |
) |
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
137,514 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(17,816 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,816 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
210,904 |
|
|
|
105,347 |
|
|
|
6,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
364,614 |
|
|
|
126,657 |
|
|
|
104,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
596,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated financial statements.
F-36
STANTEC INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the six months ended June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Stantec | |
|
Keith | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
US GAAP | |
|
US GAAP | |
|
Pro Forma Adjustments | |
|
US GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(note 2) | |
|
(note 3) | |
|
|
|
(note 4) | |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of Canadian dollars except per share amounts) | |
INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenue
|
|
$ |
291,308 |
|
|
$ |
71,787 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
363,095 |
|
Less subconsultant and other direct expenses
|
|
|
44,518 |
|
|
|
4,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
|
246,790 |
|
|
|
67,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313,795 |
|
Costs of revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,568 |
|
|
|
(41,568 |
) |
|
|
(g) |
|
|
|
|
|
Direct payroll costs
|
|
|
109,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,878 |
|
|
|
(g) |
|
|
|
139,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
137,399 |
|
|
|
25,437 |
|
|
|
11,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,526 |
|
Administrative and marketing expenses
|
|
|
100,712 |
|
|
|
18,363 |
|
|
|
10,441 |
|
|
|
(g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
(i) |
|
|
|
129,566 |
|
Depreciation of property and equipment
|
|
|
5,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,249 |
|
|
|
(g) |
|
|
|
6,933 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,830 |
|
|
|
(f) |
|
|
|
2,256 |
|
Net interest expense (income)
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
(h) |
|
|
|
1,197 |
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
30,462 |
|
|
|
7,672 |
|
|
|
(3,470 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,664 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
10,661 |
|
|
|
3,311 |
|
|
|
(1,385 |
) |
|
|
(j) |
|
|
|
12,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
19,801 |
|
|
|
4,361 |
|
|
|
(2,085 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.98 |
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.96 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (in thousands)
|
|
|
18,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,602 |
|
|
|
(k) |
|
|
|
22,539 |
|
Diluted (in thousands)
|
|
|
19,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,673 |
|
|
|
(k) |
|
|
|
23,108 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated financial statements.
F-37
STANTEC INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Stantec | |
|
Keith | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
US GAAP | |
|
US GAAP | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
US GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(note 2) | |
|
(note 3) | |
|
|
|
(note 4) | |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of Canadian dollars except per share amounts) | |
INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenue
|
|
$ |
520,879 |
|
|
$ |
137,740 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
658,619 |
|
Less subconsultant and other direct expenses
|
|
|
71,728 |
|
|
|
11,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
|
449,151 |
|
|
|
126,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
575,657 |
|
Costs of revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,925 |
|
|
|
(78,925 |
) |
|
|
(g) |
|
|
|
|
|
Direct payroll costs
|
|
|
205,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,989 |
|
|
|
(g) |
|
|
|
264,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
243,638 |
|
|
|
47,581 |
|
|
|
19,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311,155 |
|
Administrative and marketing expenses
|
|
|
183,739 |
|
|
|
30,089 |
|
|
|
17,350 |
|
|
|
(g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
(i) |
|
|
|
231,694 |
|
Depreciation of property and equipment
|
|
|
11,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,586 |
|
|
|
(g) |
|
|
|
14,572 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,874 |
|
|
|
(f) |
|
|
|
4,801 |
|
Net interest expense (income)
|
|
|
2,805 |
|
|
|
(629 |
) |
|
|
3,180 |
|
|
|
(h) |
|
|
|
5,356 |
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
(479 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
44,660 |
|
|
|
18,181 |
|
|
|
(7,570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,271 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
14,470 |
|
|
|
7,149 |
|
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
(j) |
|
|
|
18,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
30,190 |
|
|
|
11,032 |
|
|
|
(4,570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
1.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.62 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (in thousands)
|
|
|
18,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,602 |
|
|
|
(k) |
|
|
|
22,102 |
|
Diluted (in thousands)
|
|
|
19,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,673 |
|
|
|
(k) |
|
|
|
22,680 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated financial statements.
F-38
STANTEC INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial statements give effect to the acquisition of The Keith
Companies, Inc. (Keith) by Stantec Inc. (Stantec) and are
prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and have been presented in
Canadian dollars. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
balance sheet gives effect to the acquisition as if the
acquisition had occurred as of June 30, 2005. The unaudited
pro forma condensed consolidated statement of income for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 and for the year ended
December 31, 2004 gives effect to the acquisition as if the
acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2004.
On April 14, 2005, Stantec Inc. and The Keith Companies,
Inc. entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, which is
referred to as the merger agreement, under which Stantec is to
acquire all of the outstanding shares of Keith common stock.
This acquisition is to be accounted for as a purchase by
Stantec. Pursuant to the merger agreement, a Keith shareholder
will be entitled to receive for each share of Keith common stock
a) US$11.00 in cash; b) 0.23 Stantec common stock; and
c) US$5.50 worth of Stantec common stock to be calculated
by dividing US$5.50 by the simple average of the weighted
average sales price of the Stantec common stock on the Toronto
Stock Exchange (TSX) for each of the 20 trading days ending
on the second trading day prior to the closing of the merger,
converted to U.S. dollars for each trading day at the noon
buying rate quoted by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on
such trading day. At the date of merger, all of Keiths
stock options will be cancelled with no further rights. Prior to
closing, Keith will offer to purchase all unvested stock
options. All unvested restricted stock issued under the Keith
stock option plan will be substituted with 0.23 common shares of
Stantec common shares and that number of shares of Stantec
common shares equal to US$16.50 divided by the average 20-day
trading price of Stantec common stock ending on the second
trading day prior to the closing of the merger, converted to
U.S. dollars for each trading day at the noon buying rate quoted
by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on such trading day.
These Stantec common shares exchanged for the unvested Keith
restricted stock will be subject to similar restrictions to that
which the unvested restricted stock are currently subject.
The accounting policies used in the preparation of the unaudited
pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements are those
described in Stantecs audited consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2004
(note 2). These unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
merger agreement and the audited consolidated financial
statements of Stantec as at December 31, 2004, including
the notes thereto, and the unaudited interim consolidated
financial statements of Stantec as at June 30, 2005,
including the notes thereto, which are included elsewhere in
this proxy statement/prospectus and the audited consolidated
financial statements of Keith as at December 31, 2004,
including the notes thereto and the unaudited interim
consolidated financial statements of Keith as at June 30,
2005, including the notes thereto, which are incorporated by
reference in this proxy statement/prospectus (note 3).
|
|
2. |
Conversion of Stantecs Historical Financial
Statements to US GAAP |
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements are presented in Canadian dollars and in accordance
with U.S. GAAP. In order to present Stantecs historical
financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, the
cumulative translation account was recorded in and reflected as
accumulated other comprehensive income. A detailed description
of additional disclosures required under US GAAP is included in
note 21 to Stantecs consolidated financial statements
for the year ended December 31, 2004, which are included
elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus.
F-39
|
|
3. |
Conversion of Keiths Historical Financial Statements
to Canadian Dollars |
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements are presented in Canadian dollars and in accordance
with U.S. GAAP. Keiths consolidated statement of
income data for the year ended December 31, 2004 was
converted from U.S. dollars to Canadian dollars using the
average exchange rate for the period (C$1.3075 per U.S.$1.0000).
Keiths consolidated statement of income data for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 was converted from
U.S. dollars to Canadian dollars using the average exchange
rate for the period (C$1.2353 per U.S.$1.0000). Keiths
consolidated balance sheet data at June 30, 2005 was
converted to Canadian dollars using the exchange rate on that
date (C$1.2254 per U.S.$1.0000). The following schedule presents
the conversion of Keiths financial statement data from
U.S. dollars to Canadian dollars.
F-40
THE KEITH COMPANIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA
As at June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
|
US$ | |
|
C$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands of dollars) | |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
43,923 |
|
|
|
53,823 |
|
Contracts and trade receivables, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of US$1,407
|
|
|
16,743 |
|
|
|
20,517 |
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings
|
|
|
12,993 |
|
|
|
15,922 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
74,934 |
|
|
|
91,824 |
|
Equipment and leasehold improvements, net
|
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
5,686 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
23,059 |
|
|
|
28,256 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
103,360 |
|
|
|
126,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
|
1,575 |
|
|
|
1,930 |
|
Accrued employee compensation
|
|
|
7,059 |
|
|
|
8,650 |
|
Current portion of deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
1,661 |
|
|
|
2,035 |
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
3,724 |
|
|
|
4,563 |
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings
|
|
|
1,732 |
|
|
|
2,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
15,751 |
|
|
|
19,301 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
1,379 |
|
Accrued rent
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
17,390 |
|
|
|
21,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital
|
|
|
49,080 |
|
|
|
60,143 |
|
Deferred stock compensation
|
|
|
(1,315 |
) |
|
|
(1,611 |
) |
Retained earnings
|
|
|
38,197 |
|
|
|
46,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
85,970 |
|
|
|
105,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
103,360 |
|
|
|
126,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-41
THE KEITH COMPANIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME DATA
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
|
US$ | |
|
C$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands of dollars) | |
INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenue
|
|
|
58,113 |
|
|
|
71,787 |
|
Subcontractor costs
|
|
|
3,871 |
|
|
|
4,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
|
54,242 |
|
|
|
67,005 |
|
Costs of revenue
|
|
|
33,650 |
|
|
|
41,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
20,592 |
|
|
|
25,437 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
14,865 |
|
|
|
18,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
5,727 |
|
|
|
7,074 |
|
Interest income, net
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
6,211 |
|
|
|
7,672 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2,680 |
|
|
|
3,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
3,531 |
|
|
|
4,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE KEITH COMPANIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME DATA
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
|
US$ | |
|
C$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands of dollars) | |
INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenue
|
|
|
105,346 |
|
|
|
137,740 |
|
Subcontractor costs
|
|
|
8,592 |
|
|
|
11,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
|
96,754 |
|
|
|
126,506 |
|
Costs of revenue
|
|
|
60,363 |
|
|
|
78,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
36,391 |
|
|
|
47,581 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
23,013 |
|
|
|
30,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
13,378 |
|
|
|
17,492 |
|
Interest income, net
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
13,905 |
|
|
|
18,181 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
5,468 |
|
|
|
7,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
8,437 |
|
|
|
11,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
4. Pro
Forma Assumptions and Adjustments
As of June 30, 2005, there were 7,996,064 shares of Keith
common stock outstanding. Prior to the acquisition, Keith will
offer to purchase all unvested Keith stock options for a cash
payment equal to US$16.50 plus the cash value of 0.23 Stantec
common shares, based on the average trading price prior to the
acquisition, less the exercise price of the options. It is
anticipated that prior to the effective date of the acquisition,
outstanding vested Keith stock options will be exercised with a
portion of the stock options being surrendered in lieu of a cash
payment for the exercise price. This will result in estimated
Keith common stock outstanding at the acquisition date of
8,103,754. In addition, it is anticipated that 81,835 unvested
Keith restricted common stock will be exchanged for Stantec
shares which will be subject to similar restrictions to that
which the Keith restricted stock are currently subject.
As described in note 1, a portion of the purchase price
consideration will be based on the average sales price of the
Stantec common stock on the Toronto Stock Exchange for each of
the 20 trading days ending on the second trading day prior to
the closing of the merger, converted in U.S. dollars for each
trading day at the noon buying rate quoted by the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York on such trading day. The estimated
Stantec share price and U.S. dollar exchange rate used in these
unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements
in determining the number of shares is C$31.32 and C$1.2214 per
US$1.0000, respectively using a notional merger date of
August 4, 2005.
The purchase consideration is estimated as follows using an
estimated fair value for the Stantec shares issued of US$25.64
and is translated into Canadian dollars using the exchange rate
in effect at June 30, 2005 of C$1.2254 per US$1.0000:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In US | |
|
In C | |
|
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cash consideration
|
|
|
89,141 |
|
|
|
109,234 |
|
Share consideration (3,623,000 of Stantec common shares)
|
|
|
94,188 |
|
|
|
115,418 |
|
Estimated transaction costs
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
|
183,954 |
|
|
|
225,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total purchase price in Canadian dollars is dependent upon
the number of Stantec shares issued pursuant to the terms of the
merger agreement, the fair value of Stantecs shares at the
transaction date and the actual exchange rate in effect at the
transaction date. Changes in these items from the estimates
applied above will result in a change in the final purchase
consideration.
F-43
The purchase price has been allocated to the fair value of
Keiths identified assets and liabilities in accordance
with the purchase method as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In US | |
|
In C | |
|
|
$000s | |
|
$000s | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Assets and liabilities acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
41,771 |
|
|
|
51,186 |
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
16,743 |
|
|
|
20,517 |
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings
|
|
|
12,993 |
|
|
|
15,922 |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
1,562 |
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
4,075 |
|
|
|
4,994 |
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
125,662 |
|
|
|
153,986 |
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
10,977 |
|
|
|
13,451 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(23,137 |
) |
|
|
(28,352 |
) |
Other current liabilities including deferred income tax
|
|
|
(3,394 |
) |
|
|
(4,158 |
) |
Other long-term liabilities including deferred income tax
|
|
|
(5,571 |
) |
|
|
(6,827 |
) |
Deferred stock compensation
|
|
|
1,833 |
|
|
|
2,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
|
183,954 |
|
|
|
225,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above purchase price allocation is preliminary and has been
allocated based on a preliminary estimate of the fair value of
the assets and liabilities of Keith as of June 30, 2005.
The final determination of the allocation of the purchase price
will be determined based on the fair value of assets acquired,
including the fair value of intangible assets, and the fair
value of liabilities assumed as of the date the acquisition is
completed. The purchase price allocation will remain preliminary
until Stantec is able to (i) complete the valuation of
significant intangible assets acquired (anticipated to be
completed within 90 days of the merger date) and
(ii) evaluate the fair value of other assets and
liabilities acquired. The final determination of the purchase
price is expected to be completed shortly after the completion
of the acquisition. Based on the evaluation undertaken to date,
material changes to the initial estimated fair values are not
anticipated unless, due to the passage of time from the date
these balances were allocated (June 30, 2005) to the time
the transaction closes, individual working capital balances and
other balance sheet balances change significantly. This could
occur in the ordinary course of business or be influenced by
events not currently known or contemplated.
For purposes of the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
balance sheet as at June 30, 2005, C$13,451,000 of the
purchase price has been allocated to identifiable intangible
assets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Client relationships C$8,884,000
(US$7,250,000) the amount allocated was based on the
present value of the after tax profit component in identified
existing Keith client revenue streams (net of related customer
contract backlog) less after tax contributory charges for
working capital, capital assets, workforce and software, grossed
up for tax savings. The client revenue streams were identified
through analysis of historical annual fee volumes and
discussions with Keith management and may include clients for
which contracts are not currently in place. The amortization
term is estimated to be 10 years based on an evaluation of
the duration of the Keith client relationships. |
|
|
|
Contract backlog C$3,833,000
(US$3,128,000) the amount allocated was based on the
present value of the after tax profit component represented in
existing contract backlog less after tax contributory charges
for working capital, capital assets, workforce and software,
grossed up for tax savings. The amortization term is estimated
to be 18 months which is based on the term over which contract
backlog has historically been completed; and |
|
|
|
Value of favorable premise leases C$734,000
(US$599,000) the amount allocated was based on the
present value of after tax cash flows for the difference between
the actual lease rates and the fair |
F-44
|
|
|
|
|
value lease rates as determined by comparable properties that
were on the market at the time the assessment was completed,
grossed up for tax savings. The amortization period of
47 months was based on the terms of the underlying leases. |
The above purchase price allocation recognizes liabilities
assumed for restructuring costs and legal costs incurred by
Keith related to the acquisition in the amount of C$9,540,000
(US$7,785,000). These costs include relocation costs of
C$245,000 (US$200,000), insurance cancellation penalty of
C$147,000 (US$120,000), employee severance and change of control
payments of C$4,614,000 (US$3,765,000) and the cost of the
fairness opinion and transaction fee of C$4,534,000
(US$3,700,000) that has not yet been reflected in the Keith
accounts.
After completing the preliminary fair value assessment and
allocation of the purchase price to all classes of assets and
liabilities, including identifiable intangible assets, the
unallocated portion of the purchase price is reflected as
goodwill. The significant percentage of the purchase price
accounted for as goodwill is a direct result of the highly
competitive nature of the consulting services industry. The
nature of Keiths business and the industry in general is
that future cash flow is not significantly dependent on
investments in property and equipment but is dependent upon
assembling and maintaining a skilled workforce. In addition,
there are relatively few instances of strong customer
relationships or master service agreements that must be
accounted for as an intangible asset. These factors resulted in
a significant portion of the purchase price being accounted for
as goodwill.
The following adjustments have been made in the unaudited pro
forma condensed consolidated financial statements to reflect the
transaction described above:
(a) Prior to the acquisition, the outstanding vested Keith
stock options will be exercised with a portion of the stock
options being surrendered in lieu of a cash payment for the
exercise price and the tax withholdings arising on the exercise
of the options. The effect of this is an increase in the number
of Keiths outstanding shares at the acquisition date by
200,504 shares, an increase to accounts payable and accrued
liabilities by C$3,669,000 (US$2,994,000) and a decrease to
contributed surplus of C$3,669,000 (US$2,994,000).
(b) Prior to the acquisition, Keith will offer to purchase
all unvested Keith stock options at a price equal to US$16.50
plus the cash value of 0.23 Stantec common shares, based on the
average trading price prior to the acquisition, less the
exercise price of the options. The effect of this is a reduction
of Keiths cash and cash equivalents and retained earnings
of C$2,637,000 (US$2,152,000) at the acquisition date.
(c) To reflect the additional bank financing of
C$77,550,000 as at June 30, 2005 required to satisfy the cash
consideration component of the purchase price. Stantec will
access its currently unused credit facilities and obtain short
term financing at an expected interest rate of approximately
4.1%.
(d) To reflect the acquisition of Keiths net assets,
in exchange for the issuance of Stantec common shares and cash
and to eliminate the share capital and other equity accounts of
Keith.
(e) To reflect the estimated costs associated with the U.S.
listing registration that will be reflected as a reduction of
share capital in the amount of C$1,099,000, which is net of
future taxes receivable of C$592,000, and an increase in
accounts payable and accrued liabilities of C$1,691,000 at the
date of acquisition.
(f) To record the amortization of intangible assets to be
acquired from Keith based on their estimated fair market value
and estimated useful lives in the amount of C$1,830,000 for the
six months ended June 30, 2005 (December 31,
2004 C$3,874,000). For purposes of these unaudited
pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements, the
client relationships are being amortized over a period of
10 years, the contract backlog is being amortized over
18 months and the favorable premise leases are being
amortized over 47 months. These are managements best
estimate of the expected useful life of these intangible assets.
The amortization expense has been reflected in the unaudited pro
forma condensed consolidated income statement using the average
exchange rate for the six months ended June 30, 2005 of
C$1.2353 per
F-45
US$1.0000 and for the year ended December 31, 2004 of
C$1.3075 per US$1.0000. The actual expected useful life of these
intangible assets could differ when the purchase price
allocation is completed.
(g) To reclassify Keiths non direct payroll costs and
depreciation expense to conform to Stantecs historical
presentation.
(h) To reflect additional financing costs of C$1,590,000
for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and C$3,180,000 for
the year ended December 31, 2004 as a result of the
additional bank indebtedness financing of C$77,550,000 arising
on the acquisition at an expected interest rate of 4.1%.
(i) To reflect the additional compensation expense that
would have been recorded in the six months ended June 30,
2005 and for the year ended December 31, 2004 for the
vesting of restricted shares issued as part of the acquisition.
(j) To reflect the decrease in tax expense associated with
the additional interest costs, compensation cost and the
amortization of intangible assets. The net decrease in taxes is
C$1,385,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and
C$3,000,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004.
(k) The unaudited pro forma earnings per share, both basic
and diluted, is computed by dividing the pro forma income by the
pro forma weighted average number of common shares outstanding
on a basic and diluted basis. The pro forma weighted average
number of shares outstanding has been computed by adding the
unrestricted common shares to be issued in the acquisition of
3,602,000 to the weighted average number of common shares used
in the computation of Stantecs historical basic earnings
per share and 3,673,000 unrestricted and restricted shares to
the weighted average number of shares used in the computation of
Stantecs historical diluted earnings per share of the
period presented.
F-46
Appendix A
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER AND REORGANIZATION
A-1
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER AND REORGANIZATION
among
STANTEC INC.,
STANTEC CONSULTING CALIFORNIA INC.
and
THE KEITH COMPANIES, INC.
Dated as of April 14, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
|
|
| |
ARTICLE I
The Merger |
Section 1.01.
|
|
The Merger |
|
|
1 |
|
Section 1.02.
|
|
Effective Time; Closing |
|
|
1 |
|
Section 1.03.
|
|
Effect of the Merger |
|
|
2 |
|
Section 1.04.
|
|
Articles of Incorporation; By-laws |
|
|
2 |
|
Section 1.05.
|
|
Directors and Officers |
|
|
2 |
|
ARTICLE II
Conversion of Securities; Exchange of Certificates |
Section 2.01.
|
|
Conversion of Securities |
|
|
2 |
|
Section 2.02.
|
|
Exchange of Certificates |
|
|
5 |
|
Section 2.03.
|
|
Stock Transfer Books |
|
|
7 |
|
Section 2.04.
|
|
Company Stock Options |
|
|
7 |
|
Section 2.05.
|
|
Company Restricted Stock |
|
|
7 |
|
Section 2.06.
|
|
[Reserved] |
|
|
7 |
|
Section 2.07.
|
|
Dissenting Shares |
|
|
8 |
|
Section 2.08.
|
|
[Reserved] |
|
|
8 |
|
Section 2.09.
|
|
Affiliates |
|
|
8 |
|
ARTICLE III
Representations and Warranties of the Company |
Section 3.01.
|
|
Organization and Qualification; Subsidiaries |
|
|
8 |
|
Section 3.02.
|
|
Articles of Incorporation and By-laws |
|
|
9 |
|
Section 3.03.
|
|
Capitalization |
|
|
9 |
|
Section 3.04.
|
|
Authority Relative to This Agreement |
|
|
10 |
|
Section 3.05.
|
|
No Conflict; Required Filings and Consents |
|
|
10 |
|
Section 3.06.
|
|
Permits; Compliance |
|
|
10 |
|
Section 3.07.
|
|
SEC Filings; Financial Statements |
|
|
11 |
|
Section 3.08.
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes or Events |
|
|
12 |
|
Section 3.09.
|
|
Absence of Litigation |
|
|
12 |
|
Section 3.10.
|
|
Employee Benefit Plans |
|
|
12 |
|
Section 3.11.
|
|
Labor and Employment Matters |
|
|
14 |
|
Section 3.12.
|
|
Real Property; Title to Assets |
|
|
15 |
|
Section 3.13.
|
|
Intellectual Property |
|
|
15 |
|
Section 3.14.
|
|
Taxes |
|
|
15 |
|
Section 3.15.
|
|
Environmental Matters |
|
|
16 |
|
Section 3.16.
|
|
[Reserved] |
|
|
16 |
|
Section 3.17.
|
|
Material Contracts |
|
|
16 |
|
Section 3.18.
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
17 |
|
Section 3.19.
|
|
Board Approval; Vote Required |
|
|
17 |
|
Section 3.20.
|
|
Customers and Suppliers |
|
|
18 |
|
Section 3.21.
|
|
[Reserved] |
|
|
18 |
|
Section 3.22.
|
|
Interested Party Transactions |
|
|
18 |
|
Section 3.23.
|
|
Opinion of Financial Advisor |
|
|
18 |
|
Section 3.24.
|
|
Brokers |
|
|
18 |
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
|
|
| |
ARTICLE IV
Representations and Warranties of Parent and Merger Sub |
Section 4.01.
|
|
Corporate Organization |
|
|
18 |
|
Section 4.02.
|
|
Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws |
|
|
18 |
|
Section 4.03.
|
|
Capitalization |
|
|
19 |
|
Section 4.04.
|
|
Authority Relative to This Agreement |
|
|
19 |
|
Section 4.05.
|
|
No Conflict; Required Filings and Consents |
|
|
19 |
|
Section 4.06.
|
|
Permits; Compliance |
|
|
20 |
|
Section 4.07.
|
|
ASC Filings; Financial Statements |
|
|
20 |
|
Section 4.08.
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes or Events |
|
|
21 |
|
Section 4.09.
|
|
Absence of Litigation |
|
|
22 |
|
Section 4.10.
|
|
Stockholder Vote |
|
|
22 |
|
Section 4.11.
|
|
Operations of Merger Sub |
|
|
22 |
|
Section 4.12.
|
|
Taxes |
|
|
22 |
|
Section 4.13.
|
|
Board Approval |
|
|
22 |
|
Section 4.14.
|
|
[Reserved] |
|
|
22 |
|
Section 4.15.
|
|
Ownership of Company Common Stock |
|
|
22 |
|
Section 4.16.
|
|
Brokers |
|
|
22 |
|
Section 4.17.
|
|
Intellectual Property |
|
|
23 |
|
Section 4.18.
|
|
Environmental Matters |
|
|
23 |
|
|
ARTICLE V
Conduct of Business Pending the Merger |
Section 5.01.
|
|
Conduct of Business by the Company Pending the Merger |
|
|
23 |
|
Section 5.02.
|
|
Conduct of Business by Parent Pending the Merger |
|
|
25 |
|
|
ARTICLE VI
Additional Agreements |
Section 6.01.
|
|
Registration Statement; Proxy Statement |
|
|
25 |
|
Section 6.02.
|
|
Company Stockholders Meeting |
|
|
26 |
|
Section 6.03.
|
|
Access to Information; Confidentiality |
|
|
26 |
|
Section 6.04.
|
|
No Solicitation of Transactions |
|
|
27 |
|
Section 6.05.
|
|
Employee Benefit Matters |
|
|
28 |
|
Section 6.06.
|
|
Directors and Officers Indemnification and Insurance |
|
|
29 |
|
Section 6.07.
|
|
Notification of Certain Matters |
|
|
29 |
|
Section 6.08.
|
|
Company Affiliates |
|
|
29 |
|
Section 6.09.
|
|
Further Action; Reasonable Best Efforts |
|
|
30 |
|
Section 6.10.
|
|
Plan of Reorganization |
|
|
30 |
|
Section 6.11.
|
|
Obligations of Merger Sub |
|
|
31 |
|
Section 6.12.
|
|
Consents of Accountants |
|
|
31 |
|
Section 6.13.
|
|
Listing |
|
|
31 |
|
Section 6.14.
|
|
Subsequent Financial Statements |
|
|
31 |
|
Section 6.15.
|
|
Public Announcements |
|
|
31 |
|
Section 6.16.
|
|
Board of Directors of Parent |
|
|
31 |
|
Section 6.17.
|
|
Company Contribution |
|
|
31 |
|
Section 6.18.
|
|
Unvested Company Restricted Stock |
|
|
31 |
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
ARTICLE VII
Conditions to the Merger |
Section 7.01.
|
|
Conditions to the Obligations of Each Party |
|
|
32 |
|
Section 7.02.
|
|
Conditions to the Obligations of Parent and Merger Sub |
|
|
32 |
|
Section 7.03.
|
|
Conditions to the Obligations of the Company |
|
|
33 |
|
|
ARTICLE VIII
Termination, Amendment and Waiver |
Section 8.01.
|
|
Termination |
|
|
34 |
|
Section 8.02.
|
|
Effect of Termination |
|
|
35 |
|
Section 8.03.
|
|
Fees and Expenses |
|
|
35 |
|
Section 8.04.
|
|
Amendment |
|
|
36 |
|
Section 8.05.
|
|
Waiver |
|
|
36 |
|
|
ARTICLE IX
General Provisions |
Section 9.01.
|
|
Non Survival of Representations, Warranties and Agreements |
|
|
36 |
|
Section 9.02.
|
|
Notices |
|
|
36 |
|
Section 9.03.
|
|
Certain Definitions |
|
|
37 |
|
Section 9.04.
|
|
Severability |
|
|
41 |
|
Section 9.05.
|
|
Entire Agreement; Assignment |
|
|
42 |
|
Section 9.06.
|
|
Parties in Interest |
|
|
42 |
|
Section 9.07.
|
|
Specific Performance |
|
|
42 |
|
Section 9.08.
|
|
Governing Law |
|
|
42 |
|
Section 9.09.
|
|
Headings |
|
|
42 |
|
Section 9.10.
|
|
Counterparts |
|
|
42 |
|
Section 9.11.
|
|
Waiver of Jury Trial |
|
|
42 |
|
iii
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER AND REORGANIZATION, dated as of
April 14, 2005 (this Agreement), among
Stantec Inc., a Canadian corporation
(Parent), Stantec Consulting California Inc.,
a California corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent
(Merger Sub), and The Keith Companies, Inc.,
a California corporation (the Company).
WHEREAS, upon the terms and subject to the conditions of this
Agreement and in accordance with the California Corporations
Code (the CCC), Parent and the Company
will enter into a business combination transaction pursuant to
which the Company will merge with and into Merger Sub
(the Merger);
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the
Company Board) has (i) determined that
the Merger is consistent with and in furtherance of the
long-term business strategy of the Company and fair to, and in
the best interests of, the Company and its stockholders and has
approved and adopted this Agreement and declared its
advisability and approved the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement
(the Transactions) and (ii) has
recommended the approval and adoption of this Agreement by the
stockholders of the Company;
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Parent (the Parent
Board) has determined that the Merger is consistent
with and in furtherance of the long-term business strategy of
Parent and fair to, and in the best interests of, Parent and its
stockholders and has approved and adopted this Agreement, the
Merger and the other Transactions;
WHEREAS, Parent and Company CEO (Stockholder)
have entered into a Support Agreement, dated as of the date
hereof (the Support Agreement), in connection
with this Agreement, the Merger and the other
Transactions; and
WHEREAS, for United States federal income tax purposes, the
Merger is intended to qualify as a reorganization under the
provisions of Section 368(a) of the United States Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the Code);
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual
covenants and agreements herein contained, and intending to be
legally bound hereby, Parent, Merger Sub and the Company hereby
agree as follows
ARTICLE I
THE MERGER
Section 1.01. The
Merger. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in Article VII, and in accordance with the CCC, at
the Effective Time (as defined in Section 1.02), the
Company will be merged with and into the Merger Sub. As a result
of the Merger, the separate corporate existence of the Company
shall cease and the Merger Sub shall continue as the surviving
corporation of the Merger (the Surviving
Corporation).
Section 1.02. Effective
Time; Closing. On the second Business Day immediately
following the satisfaction or, if permissible, waiver of the
last conditions set forth in Article VII, the parties
hereto shall cause the Merger to be consummated by filing this
Agreement (or an Agreement of Merger that includes only the
information required by the CCC), an officers certificate
of the Company and an officers certificate of Merger Sub
(together, the Certificate of Merger) with
the Secretary of State of the State of California, in such form
as is required by, and executed in accordance with, the relevant
provisions of the CCC (the date and time of such filing of the
Certificate of Merger (or such later time as may be agreed by
each of the parties hereto and specified in the Certificate of
Merger) being the Effective Time).
Immediately prior to such filing of the Certificate of Merger, a
closing (the Closing) shall be held at the
offices of the Company, 19 Technology Drive, Irvine,
California 92618, or such other place as the parties shall
agree, for the purpose of confirming the satisfaction or waiver,
as the case may be, of the conditions set forth in
Article VII.
1
Section 1.03. Effect
of the Merger. At the Effective Time, the effect of the
Merger shall be as provided in the applicable provisions of the
CCC. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, and
subject thereto, at the Effective Time, all the property,
rights, privileges, powers and franchises of the Company and
Merger Sub shall vest in the Surviving Corporation, and all
debts, liabilities, obligations, restrictions, disabilities and
duties of each of the Company and Merger Sub shall become the
debts, liabilities, obligations, restrictions, disabilities and
duties of the Surviving Corporation.
Section 1.04. Articles
of Incorporation; By-laws.
(a) At the Effective Time, subject to Section 6.06,
the Articles of Incorporation of Merger Sub, as in effect
immediately prior to the Effective Time, shall be the Articles
of Incorporation of the Surviving Corporation until thereafter
amended as provided by law and such Articles of Incorporation.
(b) Unless otherwise determined by Parent prior to the
Effective Time, and subject to Section 6.06, at the
Effective Time, the By-laws of Merger Sub, as in effect
immediately prior to the Effective Time, shall be the By-laws of
the Surviving Corporation until thereafter amended as provided
by law, the Articles of Incorporation of the Surviving
Corporation and such By-laws.
Section 1.05. Directors
and Officers. The directors of Merger Sub immediately prior
to the Effective Time shall be the initial directors of the
Surviving Corporation, each to hold office in accordance with
the Articles of Incorporation and By-laws of the Surviving
Corporation, and the officers of Merger Sub immediately prior to
the Effective Time shall be the initial officers of the
Surviving Corporation, in each case until their respective
successors are duly elected or appointed and qualified or until
the earlier of their death, resignation or removal.
ARTICLE II
CONVERSION OF SECURITIES; EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATES
Section 2.01. Conversion
of Securities. At the Effective Time, by virtue of the
Merger and without any action on the part of Merger Sub, the
Company or the holders of any of the following securities:
(a) each share of common stock, par value US$0.001 per
share, of the Company (Company Common Stock,
all issued and outstanding shares of Company Common Stock being
hereinafter collectively referred to as the
Shares) issued and outstanding immediately
prior to the Effective Time (other than any Shares to be
cancelled pursuant to Section 2.01(i), substituted for
pursuant to Section 2.05 and any Dissenting Shares (as
hereinafter defined)) shall be cancelled and shall be converted
automatically, subject to Section 2.01 (h) and
Section 2.02, into the right to receive:
|
|
|
(i) (A) 0.23 common shares, without par value, of
Parent (Parent Common Stock) (the
Fixed Ratio Stock) and (B) that number
of shares of Parent Common Stock equal to US$16.50 divided by
the Average Stock Price (the Floating Ratio
Stock and, together with the Fixed Ratio Stock, the
Exchange Stock); or |
|
|
(ii) cash equal the sum of (A) US$16.50 and
(B) the product of (x) 0.23 and (y) Average Stock
Price (the Cash Payment); or |
|
|
(iii) (A) US$11.00, (B) the Fixed Ratio Stock and
(C) that number of Parent Common Stock equal to US$5.50
divided by the Average Stock Price (the US$5.50
Stock and, together with the Fixed Ratio Stock, the
Mixed Election Stock); or |
|
|
(iv) such other combination of shares of Parent Common
Stock and cash determined in accordance with
Section 2.01(e) or Section 2.01(f) |
(the Merger Consideration, which when used
herein shall be deemed to include cash in lieu of any fractional
shares of Parent Common Stock to which a holder is entitled
pursuant to Section 2.02(e)), in each case upon surrender
by the holder of such share of Company Common Stock of the
Certificate representing such share in accordance with
Section 2.02. Average Stock Price means
the simple average of the daily
2
weighted average sales price of Parent Common Stock on the
Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX), as reported by
Bloomberg L.P., for each of the 20 consecutive trading days
ending on (and including) the second trading day prior to the
Effective Time. The weighted average sales price for each
trading day shall be converted from Canadian dollars to
U.S. dollars at the noon buying rate quoted by the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York on such trading day;
(b) The aggregate number of shares of Parent Common Stock
(the Aggregate Stock Amount) to be issued as
Merger Consideration shall be equal to the product of
(i) the Mixed Election Stock and (ii) the difference
of (A) the number of Shares outstanding immediately prior
to the Effective Time minus (B) the sum of (x) the
number of Shares held by any Subsidiary of the Company or Parent
or any Subsidiary of Parent, (y) the number of Shares of
unvested Company Restricted Stock and (z) the number of
Dissenting Shares. The aggregate amount of cash to be paid by
Parent as Merger Consideration (the Aggregate Cash
Amount) shall be equal to the product of
(i) US$11.00 and (ii) the difference of (A) the
number of Shares outstanding immediately prior to the Effective
Time minus (B) the sum of (x) the number of Shares
held by any Subsidiary of the Company or Parent or any
Subsidiary of Parent, (y) the number of Shares of unvested
Company Restricted Stock and (z) the number of Dissenting
Shares. Any right to receive cash as all or part of the Merger
Consideration shall be without interest.
(c) Subject to the allocation and election procedures set
forth in this Section 2.01, each record holder of Shares
immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than Shares held
by the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company or Parent or any
Subsidiary of Parent and Dissenting Shares) will be entitled to
elect to receive:
|
|
|
(i) cash per Share equal the Cash Payment (a Cash
Election); or |
|
|
(ii) the number of shares, or fraction thereof, of Parent
Common Stock per Share equal to the Exchange Stock (a
Stock Election); or |
|
|
(iii) the Mixed Consideration per Share,
which consists of US$11.00 in cash and the Mixed Election Stock
(a Mixed Election, and together with the Cash
Election and the Stock Election, the
Elections); |
Each holder shall make the same Election with respect to all of
such holders Shares. All such Elections shall be made on a
form in compliance with the terms of Section 2.02 (a
Form of Election). Holders of record of
Shares who hold such shares as nominees, trustees or in other
representative capacities (a Holder
Representative) may submit multiple Forms of Election,
provided that such Holder Representative certifies that
each such Form of Election covers all the Shares held by such
Holder Representative for a particular beneficial owner. For
purposes hereof, a holder of Company Common Stock who does not
make a valid Election prior to the Election Deadline, including
by failure to return the Form of Election to the Exchange Agent
prior to the Election Deadline and as a result of revocation,
shall be deemed to have made a Mixed Election. If Parent or the
Exchange Agent shall determine that any purported Cash Election
or Stock Election was not properly made, such purported Cash
Election or Stock Election shall be deemed to be of no force and
effect and the stockholder making such purported Cash Election
or Stock Election shall for purposes hereof be deemed to have
made a Mixed Election.
(d) At the Effective Time, each Share covered by a Mixed
Election (a Mixed Election Share) shall
be converted into and exchanged for the right to receive from
Parent the Mixed Consideration;
(e) At the Effective Time, each Share covered by a Stock
Election (a Stock Election Share) shall
be converted into the right to receive the Exchange Stock;
provided, however, if after taking into account
the Elections made and deemed made pursuant to
Section 2.01(c), the number of shares of Parent Common
Stock to be issued as Merger Consideration would exceed the
Aggregate Stock Amount, then, at the Effective Time, each Stock
Election Share shall be converted into the right to receive:
|
|
|
(i) a number of shares (the Pro Rata Number of
Shares) of Parent Common Stock equal to the quotient
determined by (A) the difference of the Aggregate Stock
Amount minus the number of shares of Parent Common Stock to be
issued in exchange for Mixed Election Shares, divided by
(B) the number of Stock Election Shares; and |
3
|
|
|
(ii) an amount in cash equal to the product of (A) the
difference of (x) the Exchange Stock, minus (y) the
Pro Rata Number of Shares, multiplied by (B) the Average
Stock Price; |
(f) At the Effective Time, each Share covered by a Cash
Election (a Cash Election Share) shall
be converted into the right to receive the Cash Payment;
provided, however, if, taking into account the
Elections made and deemed made pursuant to Section 2.01(c),
the amount of cash to be paid by Parent as Merger Consideration
would exceed the Aggregate Cash Amount, then, at the Effective
Time, each Cash Election Share shall be converted into the right
to receive:
|
|
|
(i) an amount in cash (the Pro Rata Amount of
Cash) equal to the quotient determined by (A) the
difference of the Aggregate Cash Amount minus the amount of cash
to be paid in exchange for Mixed Election Shares, divided by
(B) the number of Cash Election Shares; and |
|
|
(ii) a number of shares of Parent Common Stock equal to the
quotient of (A) the difference of (x) the Cash
Payment, minus (y) the Pro Rata Amount of Cash, divided by
(B) the Average Stock Price; |
(g) The Company shall mail the Form of Election to each
person who is a holder of record of Company Common Stock on the
record date for the Company Stockholders Meeting
contemplated by Section 6.02 and shall use its reasonable
best efforts to make the Form of Election available to all
persons who become holders of Company Common Stock during the
period between such record date and the Election Deadline;
(h) To be effective, a Form of Election must be properly
completed and signed by a record holder of Company Common Stock
and submitted to the Exchange Agent and accompanied by the
Certificates as to which the Election is being made. All
Certificates so surrendered shall be subject to the exchange
procedures set forth in Section 2.02. The Exchange Agent
will have the discretion to determine whether Forms of Election
have been properly completed, signed and submitted or revoked
and to disregard immaterial defects in Forms of Election. The
decision of the Exchange Agent in such matters shall be
conclusive and binding. Neither Parent nor the Exchange Agent
will be under any obligation to notify any person of any defect
in a Form of Election submitted to the Exchange Agent. The
Exchange Agent shall also make all computations contemplated by
this Section 2.01 and all such computations shall be
conclusive and binding on the holders of Company Common Stock
absent manifest error. The Form of Election and the Certificates
must be received by the Exchange Agent by the close of business
on the last business day prior to the date on which the vote
with respect to the adoption and approval of this Agreement and
the approval of the Merger at the Company Stockholders
Meeting contemplated by Section 6.02 hereof is held (the
Election Deadline) in order to be effective.
The Exchange Agent shall not accept guarantee of delivery of
Certificates in lieu of physical delivery of Certificates. An
Election may be revoked, but only by written notice received by
the Exchange Agent prior to the Election Deadline. Upon any such
revocation, unless a duly completed Form of Election,
accompanied by a Certificate, is thereafter submitted in
accordance with this Section 2.01(i), such shares shall be
deemed to be Mixed Election Shares. In the event that this
Agreement is terminated pursuant to the provisions hereof and
any Certificates have been transmitted to the Exchange Agent
pursuant to the provisions hereof, such Certificates shall be
promptly be returned without charge to the person submitting
same;
(i) each Share held in the treasury of the Company and each
Share owned by Merger Sub, Parent or any direct or indirect
wholly owned subsidiary of Parent or of the Company immediately
prior to the Effective Time shall be cancelled without any
conversion thereof and no payment or distribution shall be made
with respect thereto; and
(j) each share of common stock, par value US$0.01 per
share, of Merger Sub issued and outstanding immediately prior to
the Effective Time shall be one validly issued, fully paid and
nonassessable share of common stock, par value US$0.01 per
share, of the Surviving Corporation;
(k) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in
this Agreement, if:
|
|
|
(i) Parent or the Company receives written notice from its
counsel specified in Article VII to the effect that such
counsel is unlikely to be able to deliver a tax opinion required
pursuant to Section 7.02(l) or Section 7.03(e), as the
case may be, on the date of the Effective Time; and |
4
|
|
|
(ii) instead of depositing the Aggregate Cash Amount and
the Aggregate Stock Amount in accordance with
Section 2.02(a), Parent deposits, or causes to be deposited
(including as contemplated by Section 7.02(f)), with the
Exchange Agent (as defined below), for the benefit of the
holders of Shares, for exchange in accordance with this
Article II through the Exchange Agent, cash in an amount
equal to US$22.00 per Share, |
Parent shall have the right, at its sole and absolute
discretion, to reverse the Merger so that Merger Sub will merge
with and into the Company, such that the separate corporate
existence of Merger Sub shall cease and the Company shall
continue as the Surviving Corporation of the Merger (a
Reverse-Subsidiary Merger). A
Reverse-Subsidiary Merger would not be intended to constitute a
plan of reorganization within the meaning of
section 1.368-2(g) of the income tax regulations
promulgated under the Code. In the event Parent effects the
acquisition of the Company pursuant to a Reverse Subsidiary
Merger in accordance with this Section 2.01(k),
(x) all references to the Merger in this
Agreement and all other related agreements, documents and
instruments, shall be deemed to be to the
Reverse-Subsidiary Merger, all references to the
Surviving Corporation shall be deemed to be to the
Company, all references to Merger Consideration shall be deemed
to mean US$22.00 per Share, and this Agreement and
(y) the conditions in Section 7.02(l) and
Section 7.03(e) shall be deemed to be waived.
Section 2.02. Exchange
of Certificates.
(a) Exchange Agent. Immediately prior to the
Effective Time, Parent shall deposit, or shall cause to be
deposited (including as contemplated by Section 7.02(f)),
with such bank or trust company that may be designated by Parent
and is reasonably satisfactory to the Company (the
Exchange Agent), for the benefit of the
holders of Shares, for exchange in accordance with this
Article II through the Exchange Agent, cash equal to the
Aggregate Cash Amount and certificates representing the
Aggregate Stock Amount, and cash, from time to time as required
to make payments in lieu of any fractional shares pursuant to
Section 2.02(e) (such cash and certificates for shares of
Parent Common Stock, together with any dividends or
distributions with respect thereto, being hereinafter referred
to as the Exchange Fund). The Exchange Agent
shall, pursuant to irrevocable instructions, deliver the cash
and shares of Parent Common Stock contemplated to be issued
pursuant to Section 2.01. Except as contemplated by
Section 2.02(g) hereof, the Exchange Fund shall not be used
for any other purpose.
(b) Exchange Procedures. As promptly as practicable
after the Effective Time, Parent shall cause the Exchange Agent
to mail to each person who was, at the Effective Time, a holder
of record of Shares entitled to receive the Merger Consideration
pursuant to Section 2.01(a): (i) a letter of
transmittal (which shall be in customary form and shall specify
that delivery shall be effected, and risk of loss and title to
the certificates evidencing such Shares (the
Certificates) shall pass, only upon proper
delivery of the Certificates to the Exchange Agent) and
(ii) instructions for use in effecting the surrender of the
Certificates pursuant to such letter of transmittal. Upon
surrender to the Exchange Agent of a Certificate for
cancellation, together with such letter of transmittal, duly
completed and validly executed in accordance with the
instructions thereto, and such other documents as may be
required pursuant to such instructions, the holder of such
Certificate shall be entitled to receive in exchange therefor
the Merger Consideration, and any dividends or other
distributions to which such holder is entitled pursuant to
Section 2.02(c), and the Certificate so surrendered shall
forthwith be cancelled. In the event of a transfer of ownership
of Shares that is not registered in the transfer records of the
Company the Merger Consideration and any dividends or other
distributions to which such holder is entitled pursuant to
Section 2.02(c) may be issued to a transferee if the
Certificate representing such Shares is presented to the
Exchange Agent, accompanied by all documents required to
evidence and effect such transfer and by evidence that any
applicable stock transfer taxes have been paid. Until
surrendered as contemplated by this Section 2.02, each
Certificate shall be deemed at all times after the Effective
Time to represent only the right to receive upon such surrender
the Merger Consideration, and any dividends or other
distributions to which such holder is entitled pursuant to
Section 2.02(c). The Merger Consideration (plus any
dividends or other distributions to which such holder is
entitled pursuant to Section 2.02(c)) shall be delivered to
each former stockholder of the Company by the Exchange Agent as
promptly as practicable following surrender of a Certificate and
a duly executed letter of transmittal.
5
(c) Distributions with Respect to Unexchanged Shares of
Parent Common Stock. No dividends or other distributions
declared or made after the Effective Time with respect to the
Parent Common Stock with a record date after the Effective Time
shall be paid to the holder of any unsurrendered Certificate
with respect to the shares of Parent Common Stock represented
thereby, and no cash payment shall be paid to any such holder
pursuant to Section 2.01(a) or 2.02(e), until the
holder of such Certificate shall surrender such Certificate.
Subject to the effect of escheat, tax or other applicable Laws
(as defined in Section 3.05(a)), following surrender of any
such Certificate, there shall be paid to the holder of the
certificates representing whole shares of Parent Common Stock
issued as part of the Merger Consideration in exchange therefor,
(i) promptly, the amount of any cash payable with respect
to a fractional share of Parent Common Stock to which such
holder is entitled pursuant to Section 2.02(e) and the
amount of dividends or other distributions with a record date
after the Effective Time and theretofore paid with respect to
such whole shares of Parent Common Stock, and (ii) at the
appropriate payment date, the amount of dividends or other
distributions, with a record date after the Effective Time but
prior to surrender and a payment date occurring after surrender,
payable with respect to such whole shares of Parent Common Stock.
(d) No Further Rights in Company Common Stock. The
Merger Consideration issued upon surrender of a Certificate in
accordance with the terms of this Article II (including,
with respect to Shares, any cash paid pursuant to
Section 2.02(c) or (e)) shall be deemed to have been issued
in full satisfaction of all rights pertaining to the Shares
formerly represented by such Certificate.
(e) No Fractional Shares. No certificates or scrip
representing fractional shares of Parent Common Stock shall be
issued upon the surrender for exchange of Certificates, and such
fractional share interests will not entitle the owner thereof to
vote or to any other rights of a shareholder of Parent. Each
holder of a fractional share interest shall be paid an amount in
cash (without interest and subject to the amount of any
withholding taxes as contemplated in Section 2.02(i)) equal
to the product obtained by multiplying (i) such fractional
share interest to which such holder (after taking into account
all fractional share interests then held by such holder) would
otherwise be entitled by (ii) the simple average of the
daily weighted average sales price of Parent Common Stock on the
TSX, as reported by Bloomberg L.P., for each of the 20
consecutive trading days ending on (and including) the second
trading day prior to the Effective Time (the weighted average
sales price for each trading day shall be converted from
Canadian dollars to U.S. dollars at the noon buying rate
quoted by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on such trading
day). As promptly as practicable after the determination of the
amount of cash, if any, to be paid to holders of fractional
share interests, the Exchange Agent shall so notify Parent, and
Parent shall deposit such amount with the Exchange Agent and
shall cause the Exchange Agent to forward payments to such
holders of fractional share interests subject to and in
accordance with the terms of Sections 2.02(b) and (c).
(f) Adjustments to Merger Consideration. The Merger
Consideration shall be adjusted to reflect appropriately the
effect of any stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend
(including any dividend or distribution of securities
convertible into Parent Common Stock or Company Common Stock),
extraordinary cash dividends, reorganization, recapitalization,
reclassification, combination, exchange of shares or other like
change with respect to Parent Common Stock or Company Common
Stock occurring on or after the date hereof and prior to the
Effective Time.
(g) Termination of Exchange Fund. Any portion of the
Exchange Fund that remains undistributed to the holders of the
Company Common Stock for twelve months after the Effective Time
shall be delivered to Parent, upon demand, and any holders of
the Shares who have not theretofore complied with this
Article II shall thereafter look only to Parent for the
Merger Consideration, and any dividends or other distributions
with respect to the Parent Common Stock to which they are
entitled pursuant to Section 2.02(c). Any portion of the
Exchange Fund remaining unclaimed by holders of Shares as of a
date which is immediately prior to such time as such amounts
would otherwise escheat to or become property of any government
entity shall, to the extent permitted by applicable Law, become
the property of Parent free and clear of any claims or interest
of any person previously entitled thereto.
6
(h) No Liability. None of the Exchange Agent, Parent
or the Surviving Corporation shall be liable to any holder of
Shares for any such Shares (or dividends or distributions with
respect thereto), or cash delivered to a public official
pursuant to any abandoned property, escheat or similar Law.
(i) Withholding Rights. Each of the Surviving
Corporation and Parent shall be entitled to deduct and withhold
from the consideration otherwise payable pursuant to this
Agreement to any holder of Shares such amounts as it is required
to deduct and withhold with respect to the making of such
payment under the Code, or any provision of state, local or
foreign tax law. To the extent that amounts are so withheld by
the Surviving Corporation or Parent, as the case may be, such
withheld amounts shall be treated for all purposes of this
Agreement as having been paid to the holder of the Shares in
respect of which such deduction and withholding was made by the
Surviving Corporation or Parent, as the case may be.
(j) Lost Certificates. If any Certificate shall have
been lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit
of that fact by the person claiming such Certificate to be lost,
stolen or destroyed and, if required by the Surviving
Corporation, the posting by such person of a bond, in such
reasonable amount as the Surviving Corporation may direct, as
indemnity against any claim that may be made against it with
respect to such Certificate, the Exchange Agent will issue in
exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed Certificate, the
Merger Consideration, and any dividends or other distributions
to which the holders thereof are entitled pursuant to
Section 2.02(c), subject to Section 2.02(g).
Section 2.03. Stock
Transfer Books. At the Effective Time, the stock transfer
books of the Company shall be closed and there shall be no
further registration of transfers of Shares thereafter on the
records of the Company. From and after the Effective Time, the
holders of Certificates representing Shares outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time shall cease to have any
rights with respect to such Shares, except as otherwise provided
in this Agreement or by Law. On or after the Effective Time, any
Certificates presented to the Exchange Agent or Parent for any
reason shall be exchanged for the Merger Consideration, and any
dividends or other distributions to which the holders thereof
are entitled pursuant to Section 2.02(c).
Section 2.04. Company
Stock Options. At the Effective Time, all options to
purchase Company Common Stock, whether or not exercisable and
whether or not vested (the Company Stock
Options), outstanding under the Companys Amended
and Restated 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, in each case as such may
have been amended, supplemented or modified (collectively, the
Company Stock Option Plans) shall be
cancelled without further rights. At least 20 days prior to
the Effective Time, the Company shall offer to purchase each
Company Stock Option which as of the Effective Time would be
unexercisable and unvested (the Unvested
Options), at a price equal to the Cash Payment less
the exercise price of such Unvested Option ( the Option
Consideration), which offer to purchase shall be
conditional upon the approval of this Agreement by the
Stockholders of the Company and the satisfaction or waiver of
all of the conditions hereunder. Prior to the Effective Time,
Parent shall have deposited, or shall have caused to be
deposited with the Exchange Agent, for the benefit of holders of
the Unvested Options that surrender such Unvested Options for
purchase by the Company for exchange in accordance with this
Section 2.04, cash equal to the aggregate Option
Consideration (such cash being hereinafter referred to as the
Option Exchange Fund). The Exchange Agent
shall, pursuant to irrevocable instructions, deliver the cash
contemplated to be delivered to the holders of the Unvested
Options pursuant to this Section 2.04 out of the Option
Exchange Fund. The Option Exchange Fund shall not be used for
any other purpose.
Section 2.05. Company
Restricted Stock. At the Effective Time, each share of
Company Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to the
Effective Time that is unvested or is subject to a repurchase
option, risk of forfeiture or other condition under the Company
Stock Option Plans or any applicable restricted stock purchase
agreement or other agreement with the Company (Company
Restricted Stock) shall be substituted with Exchange
Stock, which shall be subject to the same terms and conditions
(including, without limitation, vesting conditions) as such
Company Restricted Stock, except that current references to the
Company shall, after the Effective Time, mean Parent.
Section 2.06. [Reserved].
7
Section 2.07. Dissenting
Shares.
(a) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, any Shares that are issued and outstanding immediately
prior to the Effective Time and held by a holder (a
Dissenting Shareholder) who has not voted in
favor of the Merger or consented thereto in writing and who has
dissented in accordance with Chapter 13 of the CCC
(Dissenting Shares) as well as any Shares (a
Potential Dissenting Shares) held by a holder
(a Potential Dissenting Shareholder) that are
not voted in favor of the Merger but that have not dissented in
accordance with Chapter 13 of the CCC, shall not be
converted into a right to receive the Merger Consideration in
accordance with Section 2.01, but shall represent and
become the right to receive such consideration as may be
determined to be due such Dissenting Shareholder or Potential
Dissenting Shareholder pursuant to the laws of the State of
California, unless and until such holder fails to perfect or
withdraws or otherwise loses such holders right to dissent
under Chapter 13 of the CCC. If, after the Effective Time,
such holder fails to perfect or withdraws or otherwise loses
such holders right to dissent, such former Dissenting
Shares or Potential Dissenting Shares held by such holder shall
be treated as if they had been converted as of the Effective
Time into a right to receive, upon surrender as provided above,
such holders ratable portion of the Merger Consideration,
without any interest or dividends thereon, in accordance with
Section 2.01. In this Agreement, references to
Dissenting Shareholders shall be deemed to include
Potential Dissenting Shareholders and references to
Dissenting Shares shall be deemed to include
Potential Dissenting Shares.
(b) The Company shall give Parent (i) prompt notice of
any demands for appraisal received by the Company, withdrawals
of such demands, and any other instruments served pursuant to
the CCC and received by the Company and (ii) the
opportunity to direct all negotiations and proceedings with
respect to demands for appraisal under the CCC. The Company
shall not, except with the prior written consent of Parent, make
any payment with respect to any demands for appraisal or offer
to settle or settle any such demands.
Section 2.08. [Reserved]
Section 2.09. Affiliates.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, no Merger
Consideration shall be delivered to a person who may be deemed
an affiliate of the Company in accordance with
Section 6.08 hereof for purposes of Rule 145 under the
Securities Act until such person has executed and delivered to
Parent an executed copy of the affiliate letter contemplated in
Section 6.08 hereof.
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY
As an inducement to Parent and Merger Sub to enter into this
Agreement, the Company hereby represents and warrants to Parent
and Merger Sub that, except as disclosed in the Companys
Disclosure Schedule, which has been prepared by the Company and
delivered to Parent and Merger Sub concurrently with the
execution and delivery of this Agreement (the Company
Disclosure Schedule), or in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004 (as filed with the SEC on March 10, 2005), Current
Reports on Form 8-K (as filed with the SEC on
February 10, 2005 and February 14, 2005) and
Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (as filed with
the SEC on April 12, 2005), to the Companys knowledge:
Section 3.01. Organization
and Qualification; Subsidiaries.
(a) Each of the Company and each subsidiary of the Company
(each a Subsidiary) is a corporation or
limited liability company, as the case may be, duly organized,
validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the
jurisdiction of its organization and has the requisite corporate
or other power and authority and all necessary governmental
approvals to own, lease and operate its properties and to carry
on its business as it is now being conducted, except where the
failure to be so organized, existing or in good standing or to
have such power, authority and governmental approvals would not,
individually or in the aggregate, have a Company Material
Adverse Effect (as defined in Section 9.03(a)). Each of the
Company and each Subsidiary is duly qualified or licensed as a
foreign corporation or limited liability company, as the case
may be, to do
8
business, and is in good standing, in each jurisdiction where
the character of the properties owned, leased or operated by it
or the nature of its business makes such qualification or
licensing necessary, except for such failures to be so qualified
or licensed and in good standing that would not, individually or
in the aggregate, have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(b) A true and complete list of all the Subsidiaries,
together with the jurisdiction of incorporation of each
Subsidiary and the percentage of the outstanding capital stock
of each Subsidiary owned by the Company and each other
Subsidiary, is set forth in Section 3.01(b) of the Company
Disclosure Schedule. Except as disclosed in Section 3.01(b)
of the Company Disclosure Schedule, the Company does not
directly or indirectly own any equity or similar interest in, or
any interest convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for
any equity or similar interest in, any corporation, partnership,
joint venture or other business association or entity.
Section 3.02. Articles
of Incorporation and By-laws. The Company has heretofore
made available to Parent a complete and correct copy of the
Articles of Incorporation and the By-laws or equivalent
organizational documents, each as amended to date, of the
Company. Such Articles of Incorporation, By-laws or equivalent
organizational documents are in full force and effect. Neither
the Company nor any Subsidiary is in violation of any of the
provisions of its Articles of Incorporation, By-laws or
equivalent organizational documents. The Company has heretofore
provided to the Parent the minutes of the meetings of the Board
of Directors of the Company and any committee thereof in respect
of meetings of the Board of Directors and such committees held
since January 1, 2002 through the date hereof for which
minutes have been prepared and approved.
Section 3.03. Capitalization.
(a) The authorized capital stock of the Company consists of
(i) 100,000,000 Shares and
(ii) 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$0.001 per share (Company Preferred
Stock). As of April 2, 2005,
(i) 7,985,085 Shares were issued and outstanding, all
of which are validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable,
(ii) no Shares are held in the treasury of the Company,
(iii) no Shares are held by the Subsidiaries, and
(iv) 230,995 Shares are reserved for future issuance
pursuant to outstanding Company Stock Options, Company
Restricted Stock and other purchase rights (the Company
Stock Awards) granted pursuant to the Company Stock
Option Plans. As of the date of this Agreement, no shares of
Company Preferred Stock are issued and outstanding. Except as
set forth in this Section 3.03 there are no options,
warrants or other rights, agreements, arrangements or
commitments of any character relating to the issued or unissued
capital stock of the Company or any Subsidiary or obligating the
Company or any Subsidiary to issue or sell any shares of capital
stock of, or other equity interests in, the Company or any
Subsidiary. As of April 2, 2005, there were
(x) 265,510 outstanding Unvested Options exercisable for an
aggregate of 265,510 Shares at a weighted average exercise
price of US$12.27 per Share, and (y) 512,026 Company
Stock Options (excluding Unvested Options), exercisable for an
aggregate of 512,026 Shares at a weighted average exercise
price of US$8.23 per Share. As of the date of this
Agreement, there were 117,668 Shares of unvested Company
Restricted Stock. The Company has made available to Parent
accurate and complete copies of all Company Stock Option Plans
pursuant to which Company has granted the Company Stock Awards
that are currently outstanding and the form of all stock award
agreements evidencing such Company Stock Awards. All Shares
subject to issuance as aforesaid, upon issuance on the terms and
conditions specified in the instruments pursuant to which they
are issuable, will be duly authorized, validly issued, fully
paid and nonassessable. There are no outstanding contractual
obligations of the Company or any Subsidiary to repurchase,
redeem or otherwise acquire any Shares or any capital stock of
any Subsidiary or to provide funds to, or make any investment
(in the form of a loan, capital contribution or otherwise) in,
any Subsidiary or any other person. All outstanding Shares, all
outstanding Company Stock Awards, and all outstanding shares of
capital stock of each subsidiary of the Company have been issued
and granted in compliance with (i) all applicable
securities laws and other applicable Laws (as defined below) and
(ii) all requirements set forth in applicable contracts.
(b) Each outstanding share of capital stock of each
Subsidiary is duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and
nonassessable, and each such share is owned by the Company or
another Subsidiary free and clear
9
of all security interests, liens, claims, pledges, options,
rights of first refusal, agreements, limitations on the
Companys or any Subsidiarys voting rights, charges
and other encumbrances of any nature whatsoever.
Section 3.04. Authority
Relative to This Agreement. The Company has all necessary
corporate power and authority to execute and deliver this
Agreement, to perform its obligations hereunder and to
consummate the Transactions. The execution and delivery of this
Agreement by the Company and the consummation by the Company of
the Transactions have been duly and validly authorized by all
necessary corporate action, and no other corporate proceedings
on the part of the Company are necessary to authorize this
Agreement or to consummate the Transactions (other than, with
respect to the Merger, the approval and adoption of this
Agreement by the holders of a majority of the then-outstanding
Shares and the filing and recordation of appropriate merger
documents as required by the CCC). This Agreement has been duly
and validly executed and delivered by the Company and, assuming
the due authorization, execution and delivery by Parent and
Merger Sub, constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of
the Company, enforceable against the Company in accordance with
its terms (except as may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency,
moratorium, reorganization or similar laws affecting the rights
of creditors generally and the availability of equitable
remedies). No state takeover statute is applicable to the Merger
or the Transactions.
Section 3.05. No
Conflict; Required Filings and Consents.
(a) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by the
Company do not, and the performance of this Agreement by the
Company will not, (i) conflict with or violate the Articles
of Incorporation or By-laws or any equivalent organizational
documents of the Company or any Subsidiary, (ii) conflict
with or violate any United States or non-United States statute,
law, ordinance, regulation, rule, code, executive order,
injunction, judgment, decree or other order
(Law) applicable to the Company or any
Subsidiary or by which any property or asset of the Company or
any Subsidiary is bound or affected, or (iii) result in any
breach of or constitute a default (or an event which, with
notice or lapse of time or both, would become a default) under,
or give to others any right of termination, amendment,
acceleration or cancellation of, or result in the creation of a
lien or other encumbrance on any property or asset of the
Company or any Subsidiary pursuant to, any Material Contract (as
defined below), except, with respect to clauses (ii) and
(iii), for any such conflicts, violations, breaches, defaults or
other occurrences which would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(b) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by the
Company do not, and the performance of this Agreement by the
Company will not, require any consent, approval, authorization
or permit of, or filing with or notification to, any United
States federal, state, county or local or other foreign
government, governmental, regulatory or administrative
authority, agency, instrumentality or commission or any court,
tribunal, or judicial or arbitral body (a Governmental
Authority), except (i) for applicable
requirements, if any, of the Exchange Act, state securities or
blue sky laws (Blue Sky Laws),
the pre-merger notification requirements of the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as
amended (the HSR Act) and filing and
recordation of appropriate merger documents as required by the
CCC, and (ii) where the failure to obtain such consents,
approvals, authorizations or permits, or to make such filings or
notifications, would not, individually or in the aggregate,
individually or in the aggregate, have a Company Material
Adverse Effect.
Section 3.06. Permits;
Compliance. Each of the Company and the Subsidiaries is in
possession of all franchises, grants, authorizations, licenses,
permits, easements, variances, exceptions, consents,
certificates, approvals and orders of any Governmental Authority
necessary for each of the Company or the Subsidiaries to own,
lease and operate its properties or to carry on its business as
it is now being conducted (the Company
Permits), except where the failure to have, or the
suspension or cancellation of, any of the Company Permits would
not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Company Material
Adverse Effect. As of the date of this Agreement, no suspension
or cancellation of any of the Company Permits is pending or
threatened, except where the failure to have, or the suspension
or cancellation of, any of the Company Permits would not,
individually or in the aggregate, have a Company Material
Adverse Effect. Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary is in
conflict with, or in default, breach or violation of,
(a) any Law applicable to the Company or any Subsidiary or
by which any property or asset of the Company or any Subsidiary
is
10
bound or affected, or (b) any note, bond, mortgage,
indenture, contract, agreement, lease, license, Company Permit,
franchise or other instrument or obligation to which the Company
or any Subsidiary is a party or by which the Company or any
Subsidiary or any property or asset of the Company or any
Subsidiary is bound, except for any such conflicts, defaults,
breaches or violations that would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.07. SEC
Filings; Financial Statements.
(a) The Company has filed all forms, reports and documents
required to be filed by it with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC) since December 31,
2004, and has heretofore previously made available to Parent, in
the form filed with the SEC, (i) its Annual Reports on
Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, (ii) all proxy
statements relating to the Companys meetings of
stockholders (whether annual or special) held since May 20,
2003 and (iii) all other forms, reports and other
registration statements filed by the Company with the SEC since
December 31, 2004 (the forms, reports and other documents
referred to in clauses (i), (ii), (iii) and
(iv) above being, collectively, the Company SEC
Reports). The Company SEC Reports (i) complied in
all material respects with either the requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities
Act), or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act), as the case may
be, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and
(ii) did not, at the time they were filed, or, if amended,
as of the date of such amendment, contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to
be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements
made therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they
were made, not misleading, except that to the extent information
as of a later date conflicts with information of an earlier
date, the information of such later date shall be deemed to
modify such earlier information. No Subsidiary is required to
file any form, report or other document with the SEC.
(b) Each of the consolidated financial statements
(including, in each case, any notes thereto) contained in the
Company SEC Reports was prepared in accordance with United
States generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) applied on a consistent basis (except
that unaudited financial statements are subject to year-end
audit adjustments and may not contain notes in full compliance
with GAAP) throughout the periods indicated (except as may be
indicated in the notes thereto) and each fairly presents, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial position, results
of operations and cash flows of the Company and its consolidated
Subsidiaries as at the respective dates thereof and for the
respective periods indicated therein.
(c) Except as and to the extent set forth on, or reserved
against, the consolidated balance sheet of the Company and the
Subsidiaries as at December 31, 2004, including the notes
thereto (the 2004 Balance Sheet), neither the
Company nor any Subsidiary has any liability or obligation of
any nature (whether accrued, absolute, contingent or otherwise),
except for liabilities and obligations, incurred in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice since
December 31, 2004, which have not had, individually or in
the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(d) The Company has responded to all comments or requests
received from the SEC or the staff of the SEC since
January 1, 2002 and the SEC or the staff of the SEC, as the
case may be, has not made any supplemental comments or requests
with respect to the matters described therein.
(e) The Company has timely filed all certifications and
statements required by (x) Rule 13a-14 or
Rule 15d-14 under the Exchange Act or
(y) 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) with respect to any Company SEC
Report. The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures
required by Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 under the
Exchange Act; such controls and procedures are effective to
ensure that all material information concerning the Company and
its Subsidiaries is made known on a timely basis to the
individuals responsible for the preparation of the
Companys SEC filings.
(f) The Company maintains and will continue to maintain
books and records in accordance with GAAP, in all material
respects and to the extent that GAAP is applicable to the
maintenance of books and records. The Company and its
Subsidiaries maintain a system of internal accounting controls
sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that
(i) transactions are executed in accordance with
managements general or specific authorizations,
(ii) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in
11
conformity with GAAP, (iii) access to assets is permitted
only in accordance with managements general or specific
authorization and (iv) the recorded accountability for
assets is compared with the existing assets at reasonable
intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any
differences.
(g) Accounts receivable, book debts and other debts due or
accruing to the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole,
reflected on the 2004 Balance Sheet or arising thereafter, have
arisen, in all material respects, from bona fide,
arms length transactions between unrelated parties in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice and,
subject to an allowance for doubtful accounts that has been
reflected on the books and records of the Company and its
Subsidiaries, as applicable, in accordance with GAAP and the
regulations of the SEC, which are collectible without setoff or
counterclaim, except as would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(h) Accounts payable of the Company and its Subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, reflected on the 2004 Balance Sheet or arising
thereafter are, in all material respects, the result of
bona fide transactions in the ordinary course of business
and have been paid or are not yet due or payable. Since the date
of the 2004 Balance Sheet, the Company and its Subsidiaries have
not altered in any material respects their practices for the
payment of such accounts payable, including the timing of such
payment, except as would not, individually or in the aggregate,
have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(i) The work in progress reflected on the 2004 Balance
Sheet was owned by the Company and its Subsidiaries on
December 31, 2004. The value of such work in progress at
December 31, 2004 has been recorded appropriately and
represents work in progress that can be invoiced and collected
in the ordinary course of business, except as would not,
individually or in the aggregate, have a Company Material
Adverse Effect.
(j) The Company and its Subsidiaries have appropriately
accrued project liabilities on its financial statements in
accordance with GAAP, in all material respects.
(k) The Company and its Subsidiaries have appropriately
deferred the recognition of revenues on projects where amounts
have been invoiced in advance of the underlying work having been
completed in accordance with GAAP, in all material respects.
Section 3.08. Absence
of Certain Changes or Events. Since December 31, 2004,
except as expressly contemplated by this Agreement (a) the
Company and the Subsidiaries have conducted their businesses in
all material respects only in the ordinary course and in a
manner consistent with past practice, and (b) there has not
been any Company Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.09. Absence
of Litigation. Except as set forth in Section 3.09 of
the Company Disclosure Schedule, there is no
(i) litigation, suit, claim, action, proceeding or
investigation (an Action) pending or
threatened against the Company or any Subsidiary, or any
property or asset of the Company or any Subsidiary, before any
Governmental Authority, or (ii) material property or asset
of the Company or any Subsidiary that is subject to any
continuing order of, consent decree, settlement agreement or
other similar written agreement with, or continuing
investigation by, any Governmental Authority, or any order,
writ, judgment, injunction, decree, determination or award of
any Governmental Authority that, in each case, would,
individually or in the aggregate, have a Company Material
Adverse Effect.
Section 3.10. Employee
Benefit Plans.
(a) Section 3.10(a) of the Company Disclosure Schedule
lists (i) all employee benefit plans (as defined in
Section 3(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974, as amended (ERISA)) and all other
material employment benefit agreements or arrangements
including, without limitation, all bonus, stock option, stock
purchase, restricted stock, incentive, deferred compensation,
retiree medical or life insurance, supplemental retirement,
severance or other benefit plans, programs or arrangements, and
employment, termination, severance or other contracts or
agreements to which the Company or any Subsidiary is a party,
which are maintained, contributed to or sponsored by the Company
or any Subsidiary for the benefit of any current or former
employee, officer or director of the Company or any Subsidiary,
(ii) each employee benefit plan for which the Company or
any Subsidiary could incur liability under Section 4069 of
ERISA in the
12
event such plan has been or were to be terminated,
(iii) any plan in respect of which the Company or any
Subsidiary could incur liability under Section 4212(c) of
ERISA (collectively, the Plans). Neither the
Company nor any Subsidiary has any express or implied
commitment, whether legally enforceable or not, (i) to
create, incur liability with respect to or cause to exist any
other Plan, or (ii) to modify, change or terminate any
Plan, other than with respect to a modification, change or
termination required by ERISA, the Code or this Agreement.
(b) None of the Plans is a multiemployer plan (within the
meaning of Section 3(37) or 4001(a)(3) of ERISA) (a
Multiemployer Plan) or a single employer
pension plan (within the meaning of Section 4001(a)(15) of
ERISA) for which the Company or any Subsidiary could incur
liability under Section 4063 or 4064 of ERISA (a
Multiple Employer Plan). None of the Plans
(i) obligates the Company or any Subsidiary to pay
separation, severance, termination or similar-type benefits
solely or partially as a result of any transaction contemplated
by this Agreement, or (ii) obligates the Company or any
Subsidiary to make any payment or provide any benefit as a
result of a change in control, within the meaning of
such term under Section 280G of the Code. None of the Plans
provides for or promises retiree medical, disability or life
insurance benefits to any current or former employee, officer or
director of the Company or any Subsidiary.
(c) Each Plan is now and always has been operated in all
material respects in accordance with its terms and the
requirements of all applicable Laws including, without
limitation, ERISA and the Code. The Company and the Subsidiaries
have performed all obligations required to be performed by them
under, are not in any respect in default under or in violation
of, and have no knowledge of any default or violation by any
party to, any Plan. No Action is pending or threatened with
respect to any Plan (other than claims for benefits in the
ordinary course) and no fact or event exists that could
reasonably be expected to give rise to any such Action. The
Company and the Subsidiaries are in compliance with the
applicable requirements of Section 4980(B) of the Code,
with respect to each Plan that is a group health
plan, as such term is defined in Section 5000(b)(1)
of the Code.
(d) Each Plan that is intended to be qualified under
Section 401(a) of the Code or Section 401(k) of the
Code has timely received a favorable determination letter from
the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS)
covering all of the provisions applicable to the Plan for which
determination letters are currently available that the Plan is
so qualified and each trust established in connection with any
Plan which is intended to be exempt from federal income taxation
under Section 501(a) of the Code has received a
determination letter from the IRS that it is so exempt, and no
fact or event has occurred since the date of such determination
letter or letters from the IRS to adversely affect the qualified
status of any such Plan or the exempt status of any such trust.
Each Plan that is intended to be qualified under
Section 401(a) of the Code has been submitted to the IRS
for a determination that GUST amendments have been
appropriately made prior to the end of the GUST remedial period.
Each Plan that is intended to be qualified under
Section 401(a) of the Code has adopted good faith
amendments designed to comply with the requirements of the
Economic Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act, and such
amendments were effective prior to the applicable amendment
deadline.
(e) There has not been any prohibited transaction (within
the meaning of Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of
the Code) with respect to any Plan. Neither the Company nor any
Subsidiary has incurred any liability under, arising out of or
by operation of Title IV of ERISA (other than liability for
premiums to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation arising in
the ordinary course), including, without limitation, any
liability in connection with (i) the termination or
reorganization of any employee benefit plan subject to
Title IV of ERISA, or (ii) the withdrawal from any
Multiemployer Plan or Multiple Employer Plan, and no fact or
event exists which could reasonably be expected to give rise to
any such liability.
(f) All contributions, premiums or payments required to be
made with respect to any Plan have been made on or before their
due dates. All such contributions have been fully deducted for
income tax purposes and no such deduction has been challenged or
disallowed by any Governmental Authority and no fact or event
exists which could reasonably be expected to give rise to any
such challenge or disallowance.
13
(g) In addition to the foregoing, with respect to each Plan
that is not subject to United States law (a
Non-U.S. Benefit Plan):
|
|
|
(i) all employer and employee contributions to each
Non-U.S. Benefit Plan required by law or by the terms of
such Non-U.S. Benefit Plan have been made, or, if
applicable, accrued in accordance with normal accounting
practices, and a pro rata contribution for the period prior
to and including the date of this Agreement has been made or
accrued; |
|
|
(ii) the fair market value of the assets of each funded
Non-U.S. Benefit Plan, the liability of each insurer for
any Non-U.S. Benefit Plan funded through insurance or the
book reserve established for any Non-U.S. Benefit Plan,
together with any accrued contributions, is sufficient to
procure or provide for the benefits determined on any ongoing
basis (actual or contingent) accrued to the date of this
Agreement with respect to all current and former participants
under such Non-U.S. Benefit Plan according to the actuarial
assumptions and valuations most recently used to determine
employer contributions to such Non-U.S. Benefit Plan, and
no Transaction shall cause such assets or insurance obligations
to be less than such benefit obligations; and |
|
|
(iii) each Non-U.S. Benefit Plan required to be
registered has been registered and has been maintained in good
standing with applicable regulatory authorities. Each
Non-U.S. Benefit Plan has been operated in full compliance
with all applicable non-United States laws. |
Section 3.11. Labor
and Employment Matters.
(a) Except as set forth in Section 3.11(a) of the
Company Disclosure Schedule, (i) there are no material
labor controversies, material labor strikes, material slowdowns,
material work stoppages or material lockouts pending or
threatened between the Company or any Subsidiary and any of
their respective employees and neither the Company nor any
Subsidiary has experienced any such controversy, strike,
slowdown, work stoppage or lockout within the past three years;
(ii) neither the Company nor any Subsidiary is a party to
any collective bargaining agreement or other labor union
contract applicable to persons employed by the Company or any
Subsidiary, nor has any union certification or decertification
been filed or threatened that relates to employees of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries and no union authorization
campaign has been conducted within the 12 months prior to
the date of this Agreement; (iii) neither the Company nor
any Subsidiary has breached or otherwise failed to comply with
any provision of any such collective bargaining agreement or
labor union contract, and there are no grievances outstanding
against the Company or any Subsidiary under any such collective
bargaining or material labor union agreement or contract; and
(iv) there are no unfair labor practice complaints pending
against the Company or any Subsidiary before the National Labor
Relations Board (or similar foreign agency). The consent of each
labor union which is a party to the collective bargaining
agreements listed in Section 3.11 of the Company Disclosure
Schedule is not required to consummate the Transactions.
(b) The Company and the Subsidiaries are in compliance, in
all material respects, with all applicable laws relating to the
employment of labor, including those related to wages, hours,
collective bargaining, worker classification and the payment and
withholding of taxes and other sums as required by the
appropriate Governmental Authority and have withheld and paid to
the appropriate Governmental Authority or are holding for
payment not yet due to such Governmental Authority all amounts
required to be withheld from employees of the Company or any
Subsidiary and are not liable for any arrears of wages, taxes,
penalties or other sums for failure to comply with any of the
foregoing, except in each case those that would not,
individually or in the aggregate, have a Company Material
Adverse Effect. The Company and the Subsidiaries have paid in
full to all employees or adequately accrued for in accordance
with GAAP consistently applied all wages, salaries, commissions,
bonuses, benefits and other compensation due to or on behalf of
such employees and there is no material claim with respect to
payment of wages, salary, vacation, improper worker
classification or overtime pay that has been asserted or is now
pending or threatened before any Governmental Authority with
respect to any persons currently or formerly employed by the
Company or any Subsidiary, except in each case those that would
not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Company Material
Adverse Effect. Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary is a
party to, or otherwise bound by, any consent decree with, or
citation by, any Governmental Authority relating to employees or
employment
14
practices, except those that would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Company Material Adverse Effect. There is no
charge or proceeding with respect to a violation of any
occupational safety or health standards that has been asserted
or is now pending or threatened with respect to the Company,
except in each case those that would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Company Material Adverse Effect. There is no
charge of discrimination in employment or employment practices,
for any reason, including, without limitation, age, gender,
race, religion or other legally protected category, which has
been asserted or is now pending or threatened before the United
States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, or any other
Governmental Authority in any jurisdiction in which the Company
or any Subsidiary has employed or employ any person.
Section 3.12. Real
Property; Title to Assets.
(a) Section 3.12 of the Company Disclosure Schedule
sets forth a complete and accurate list and description of all
real property leased, subleased or otherwise occupied by the
Company or its Subsidiaries (the Leased Real
Property). The Company and its subsidiaries do not own
and have never owned any real property. All of the leases or
subleases of any Leased Property (the Leases)
are valid, binding and in full force and effect and there is
not, under any such Leases, any existing material default or
event of default (or event which, with notice or lapse of time,
or both, would constitute a default) by the Company or any
Subsidiary.
(b) There are no material contractual or material legal
restrictions that preclude or restrict the ability to use any
real property leased by the Company or any Subsidiary for the
purposes for which it is currently being used. There are no
material defects or material adverse physical conditions
affecting the real property, and improvements thereon leased by
the Company or any Subsidiary other than those that would not,
individually or in the aggregate, have a Company Material
Adverse Effect.
Section 3.13. Intellectual
Property. Except as would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Company Material Adverse Effect, (a) the
conduct of the business of the Company and the Subsidiaries as
currently conducted does not infringe upon or misappropriate the
Intellectual Property rights of any third party, and no claim
has been asserted to the Company that the conduct of the
business of the Company and the Subsidiaries as currently
conducted infringes upon or may infringe upon or misappropriates
the Intellectual Property Rights of any third party;
(b) with respect to each item of Intellectual Property
owned by the Company or a Subsidiary and material to the
business, financial condition or results of operations of the
Company and the Subsidiaries taken as a whole (Company
Owned Intellectual Property), the Company or a
Subsidiary is the owner of the entire right, title and interest
in and to such Company Owned Intellectual Property and is
entitled to use such Company Owned Intellectual Property in the
continued operation of its respective business; (c) with
respect to each item of Intellectual Property licensed to the
Company or a Subsidiary that is material to the business of the
Company and the Subsidiaries as currently conducted
(Company Licensed Intellectual Property), the
Company or a Subsidiary has the right to use such Company
Licensed Intellectual Property in the continued operation of its
respective business in accordance with the terms of the license
agreement governing such Company Licensed Intellectual Property;
(d) the Company Owned Intellectual Property is valid and
enforceable, and has not been adjudged invalid or unenforceable
in whole or in part; (e) each license of the Company
Licensed Intellectual Property is valid and enforceable, is
binding on all parties to such license, and is in full force and
effect; and (f) neither the execution of this Agreement nor
the consummation of the Merger shall adversely affect any of the
Companys rights with respect to any material Company Owned
Intellectual Property or any material Company Licensed
Intellectual Property.
Section 3.14. Taxes.
The Company and the Subsidiaries have filed all United States
federal, state, local and non-United States Tax returns and
reports required to be filed by them and have paid and
discharged all Taxes required to be paid or discharged, other
than such payments as are being contested in good faith by
appropriate proceedings. All such Tax returns are true, accurate
and complete. Except as set forth in Section 3.14 of the
Company Disclosure Schedule, neither the IRS nor any other
United States or non-United States taxing authority or agency is
now asserting or threatening to assert against the Company or
any Subsidiary any deficiency or claim for any Taxes or interest
thereon or penalties in connection therewith.
15
Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary has granted any waiver of
any statute of limitations with respect to, or any extension of
a period for the assessment of, any Tax. The accruals and
reserves for Taxes reflected in the 2004 Balance Sheet are
adequate to cover all Taxes accruable through such date
(including interest and penalties, if any, thereon) in
accordance with GAAP. There are no Tax liens upon any property
or assets of the Company or any of the Subsidiaries except liens
for current Taxes not yet delinquent. Neither the Company nor
any of the Subsidiaries has been required to include in income
any adjustment pursuant to Section 481 of the Code by
reason of a voluntary change in accounting method initiated by
the Company or any of the Subsidiaries, and the IRS has not
initiated or proposed any such adjustment or change in
accounting method, in either case which adjustment or change
would have a Company Material Adverse Effect. Neither the
Company nor any Subsidiary has been a distributing
corporation or a controlled corporation in a
distribution intended to qualify under Section 355(e) of
the Code within the past five years. Neither the Company nor any
of its affiliates has taken or agreed to take any action that
would prevent the Merger from qualifying as a reorganization
within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. The
Company is not aware of any agreement, plan or other
circumstance that would prevent the Merger from qualifying as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code. The Company does not have any interest in any joint
venture, partnership or other entity or arrangement that could
be treated as a partnership for United States federal income tax
purposes.
Section 3.15. Environmental
Matters. Except as described in Section 3.15 of the
Company Disclosure Schedule or as would not, individually or in
the aggregate, have a Company Material Adverse Effect,
(a) none of the Company nor any of the Subsidiaries has
violated or is in violation of any Environmental Law;
(b) none of the properties currently or formerly owned,
leased or operated by the Company or any Subsidiary (including,
without limitation, soils and surface and ground waters) are
contaminated with any Hazardous Substance; (c) none of the
Company or any of the Subsidiaries is actually, potentially or
allegedly liable for any off-site contamination by Hazardous
Substances; (d) none of the Company or any of the
Subsidiaries is actually, potentially or allegedly liable under
any Environmental Law (including, without limitation, pending or
threatened liens); (e) each of the Company and each
Subsidiary has all permits, licenses and other authorizations
required under any Environmental Law (Environmental
Permits); and (f) each of the Company and each
Subsidiary is in compliance with its Environmental Permits; and
(g) neither the execution of this Agreement nor the
consummation of the Merger will require any investigation,
remediation or other action with respect to Hazardous
Substances, or any notice to or consent of Governmental
Authorities or third parties, pursuant to any applicable
Environmental Law or Environmental Permit.
Section 3.16. [Reserved].
Section 3.17. Material
Contracts.
(a) Subsections (i) through (viii) of
Section 3.17(a) of the Company Disclosure Schedule list the
following types of contracts and agreements to which the Company
or any Subsidiary is a party (such contracts and agreements as
are required to be set forth in Section 3.17(a) of the
Company Disclosure Schedule being the Material
Contracts):
|
|
|
(i) each material contract (as such term is
defined in Item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K of the
SEC) with respect to the Company and its Subsidiaries; |
|
|
(ii) each contract and agreement which is likely to involve
consideration of more than US$5,000,000, in the aggregate, in
any 12-month period; |
|
|
(iii) any employment or consulting agreement or any other
written agreement with any other officer, employee or consultant
with annual compensation in excess of US$100,000 or which
includes a change of control provision or provides for severance
obligations upon termination; |
|
|
(iv) all management contracts (excluding contracts
(i) for employment or (ii) which involve consideration
of less than US$100,000 in any 12-month period or
(iii) which are terminable with no more than 90 days
notice without payment of a termination fee), including any
contracts involving the payment of royalties or other amounts
calculated based upon the revenues or income of the Company or |
16
|
|
|
any Subsidiary or income or revenues related to any product of
the Company or any Subsidiary to which the Company or any
Subsidiary is a party; |
|
|
(v) all contracts and agreements with any Governmental
Authority to which the Company or any Subsidiary is a party that
are not for professional services or not otherwise in the
ordinary course of business; |
|
|
(vi) all contracts and agreements that limit, or purport to
limit, the ability of the Company or any Subsidiary to compete
in any line of business or in any geographic area; |
|
|
(vii) all material contracts or arrangements that result in
any person or entity holding a power of attorney from the
Company or any Subsidiary that relates to the Company, any
Subsidiary or their respective businesses, excluding any power
of attorney entered into in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice; and |
|
|
(viii) all other contracts and agreements, whether or not
made in the ordinary course of business, which the breach,
non-performance, amendment, termination or the absence of would,
individually, have a Company Material Adverse Effect. |
No contract pursuant to which the Company or any Subsidiary
performs professional services in the ordinary course of
business shall constitute a Material Contract.
(b) Except as would not, individually or in the aggregate,
have a Company Material Adverse Effect, (i) each Material
Contract is a valid and binding agreement and neither the
Company nor any Subsidiary is in default of a Material Contract;
(ii) no Material Contract has been cancelled by the other
party; (iii) the Company and the Subsidiaries have not
received any claim of default by the Company or the Subsidiaries
under any such agreement; and (iv) neither the execution of
this Agreement nor the consummation of any Transaction shall
constitute a default under, give rise to cancellation rights
under, any Material Contract. The Company has furnished or made
available to Parent true and complete copies of all Material
Contracts, including any amendments thereto through the date of
this Agreement.
Section 3.18. Insurance.
The Company and its Subsidiaries have in effect insurance
coverage with reputable insurers or are self-insured, which in
respect of amounts, premiums, assets, types and risks insured,
constitutes reasonably adequate coverage against all risks
customarily insured against by companies in the same or similar
lines of business as the Company and its Subsidiaries and
comparable in size and operations to the Company and its
Subsidiaries. The Company has made available to Parent a copy of
all material insurance policies and all material self insurance
programs or arrangements relating to the business, assets and
operations of the Company and its subsidiaries (the
Insurance Policies). Each of such Insurance
Policies is in full force and effect as of the date of this
Agreement. From December 31, 2002 through the date hereof,
none of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has received any
notice or other communications regarding any actual or possible
(a) cancellation of any Insurance Policy that has not been
renewed in the ordinary course of business without lapse of
coverage, (b) invalidation of any Insurance Policy,
(c) refusal of any coverage or rejection of any material
claim under any Insurance Policy or (d) any material
adjustment in the amount of any of the premiums payable with
respect to any Insurance Policy.
Section 3.19. Board
Approval; Vote Required.
(a) The Company Board, by resolutions duly adopted by
unanimous vote of those voting at a meeting duly called and held
and not subsequently rescinded or modified in any way, has duly
(i) determined that this Agreement and the Merger are fair
to and in the best interests of the Company and its
stockholders, (ii) approved this Agreement and the Merger,
and (iii) recommended that the stockholders of the Company
approve and adopt this Agreement and approve the Merger and
directed that this Agreement and the Transactions be submitted
for consideration by the Companys stockholders at the
Company Stockholders Meeting (as defined below).
(b) The only vote of the holders of any class or series of
capital stock of the Company necessary to approve this
Agreement, the Merger and the other Transactions is the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding
Shares in favor of the approval and adoption of this Agreement.
17
Section 3.20. Customers
and Suppliers. Section 3.20 of the Company Disclosure
Schedule sets forth a true and complete list of the top
ten (10) customers of the Company and its Subsidiaries
(based on the revenue from such customer during the 12-month
period ended March 31, 2005). As of the date of this
Agreement, the loss of any single customer or supplier of the
Company and its Subsidiaries would not cause a Company Material
Adverse Effect.
Section 3.21. [Reserved].
Section 3.22. Interested
Party Transactions. Except as set forth in the Company SEC
Reports or employment or other compensation arrangements in the
ordinary course, there are no transactions, agreements,
arrangements or understandings between the Company and the
Subsidiaries, on the one hand, and any affiliate (including any
officer or director) thereof, (excluding any Subsidiary of the
Company that is an affiliate of the Company solely by virtue of
it being a Subsidiary of the Company). The Company and the
Subsidiaries have not, since July 30, 2002,
(i) extended or maintained credit, arranged for the
extension of credit or renewed an extension of credit in the
form of a personal loan to or for any director or executive
officer (or equivalent thereof) of the Company, or
(ii) materially modified any term of any such extension or
maintenance of credit.
Section 3.23. Opinion
of Financial Advisor. The Board of Directors of the Company
has received the written opinion of Bear Stearns & Co.
Inc., dated the date of this Agreement, to the effect that, as
of the date of this Agreement, the Merger Consideration is fair,
from a financial point of view, to the Companys
stockholders, a copy of which opinion will be delivered to
Parent on the date of this Agreement.
Section 3.24. Brokers.
No broker, finder or investment banker (other than Bear
Stearns & Co. Inc.) is entitled to any brokerage,
finders or other fee or commission in connection with the
Transactions based upon arrangements made by or on behalf of the
Company. The Company has heretofore furnished to Parent a
complete and correct copy of all agreements between the Company
and Bear Stearns & Co. Inc. pursuant to which such firm
would be entitled to any payment relating to the Transactions.
ARTICLE IV
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND MERGER SUB
As an inducement to the Company to enter into this Agreement,
Parent and Merger Sub hereby, jointly and severally, represent
and warrant to the Company that, except as disclosed in
Parents (i) Annual Information Form dated as of
March 20, 2005; (ii) Management Information Circular;
and (iii) 2004 Annual report (each as filed with the
Alberta Securities Commission (the ASC) on
March 31, 2005), to Parent and Merger Subs knowledge:
Section 4.01. Corporate
Organization. Parent is a corporation validly subsisting
under the Canada Business Corporations Act and Merger Sub is a
corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good
standing under the laws of the State of California and each of
them has the requisite corporate power and authority and all
necessary governmental approvals to own, lease and operate its
properties and to carry on its business as it is now being
conducted, except where the failure to be so organized, existing
or in good standing or to have such power, authority and
governmental approvals would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Parent Material Adverse Effect (as defined in
Section 9.03(a)).
Section 4.02. Articles
of Incorporation and By-Laws. Parent has heretofore
furnished to the Company a complete and correct copy of the
Articles of Incorporation and the By-Laws of Parent and Merger
Sub, each as amended to date. Such Articles of Incorporation and
By-Laws are in full force and effect. Neither Parent nor Merger
Sub is in violation of any of the provisions of its Articles of
Incorporation or By-Laws. Parent has heretofore furnished to the
Company the minutes of the meetings of the Board of Directors of
Parent and any committee thereof in respect of meetings of the
Board of Directors and such committees held since
January 1, 2001 through the date hereof for which minutes
have been prepared and approved.
18
Section 4.03. Capitalization.
(a) The authorized share capital of Parent consists of
(i) unlimited shares of Parent Common Stock and
(ii) unlimited preferred shares, without par value
(Parent Preferred Stock). As of
April 13, 2005, (i) 18,937,019 shares of Parent
Common Stock are issued and outstanding, all of which are
validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable, (ii) no
shares of Parent Common Stock are held in the treasury of Parent
(excluding shares of Parent Common Stock purchased pursuant to
Parents normal course issuer bid which are to be
cancelled) and (iii) no shares of Parent Common Stock are
held by subsidiaries of Parent. As of the date of this
Agreement, no shares of Parent Preferred Stock are issued and
outstanding. Except as set forth in this Section 4.03 and
except for stock options granted pursuant to the stock option
plans of Parent (the Parent Stock Option
Plans), there are no options, warrants or other
rights, agreements, arrangements or commitments of any character
relating to the issued or unissued capital stock of Parent or
Merger Sub or obligating Parent or Merger Sub to issue or sell
any shares of capital stock of, or other equity interests in,
Parent or Merger Sub. All shares of Parent Common Stock subject
to issuance as aforesaid, upon issuance on the terms and
conditions specified in the instruments pursuant to which they
are issuable, will be duly authorized, validly issued, fully
paid and non-assessable. There are no outstanding contractual
obligations of Parent or Merger Sub to repurchase, redeem or
otherwise acquire any shares of Parent Common Stock or any
capital stock of Merger Sub. There are no outstanding
contractual obligations of Parent to provide funds to, or make
any investment (in the form of a loan, capital contribution or
otherwise) in, Merger Sub or any other person excluding Parent
or any subsidiary of Parent).
(b) The authorized capital stock of Merger Sub consists of
100 shares of common stock, par value US$0.001 per
share, all of which are duly authorized, validly issued, fully
paid and non-assessable and free of any preemptive rights in
respect thereof and all of which are owned by Parent. Each
outstanding share of capital stock of Merger Sub is duly
authorized, validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable and
each such share is owned by Parent or Merger Sub free and clear
of all security interests, liens, claims, pledges, options,
rights of first refusal, agreements, limitations on
Parents or Merger Subs voting rights, charges and
other encumbrances of any nature whatsoever, except where
failure to own such shares free and clear would not,
individually or in the aggregate, have a Parent Material Adverse
Effect.
(c) The shares of Parent Common Stock to be issued pursuant
to the Merger in accordance with Section 2.01 (i) will
be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and
non-assessable and not subject to preemptive rights created by
statute, Parents Articles of Incorporation or By-Laws or
any agreement to which Parent is a party or is bound and
(ii) will, when issued, be registered under the Securities
Act and the Exchange Act and registered or exempt from
registration under applicable Blue Sky Laws.
Section 4.04. Authority
Relative to This Agreement. Each of Parent and Merger Sub
has all necessary corporate power and authority to execute and
deliver this Agreement, to perform its obligations hereunder and
to consummate the Transactions. The execution and delivery of
this Agreement by Parent and Merger Sub and the consummation by
Parent and Merger Sub of the Transactions have been duly and
validly authorized by all necessary corporate action, and no
other corporate proceedings on the part of Parent or Merger Sub
are necessary to authorize this Agreement or to consummate the
Transactions (other than, with respect to the Merger, the filing
and recordation of appropriate merger documents as required by
the CCC). This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and
delivered by Parent and Merger Sub and, assuming due
authorization, execution and delivery by the Company,
constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of each of
Parent and Merger Sub, enforceable against each of Parent and
Merger Sub in accordance with its terms (except as may be
limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium, reorganization or
similar laws affecting the rights of creditors generally and the
availability of equitable remedies).
Section 4.05. No
Conflict; Required Filings and Consents.
(a) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Parent
and Merger Sub do not, and the performance of this Agreement by
Parent and Merger Sub will not, (i) conflict with or
violate the Articles of Incorporation or By-laws of either
Parent or Merger Sub, (ii) assuming that all consents,
approvals, authorizations and other actions described in
Section 4.05(b) have been obtained and all filings and
obligations described in Section 4.05(b) have been made,
conflict with or violate any law, rule, regulation,
19
order, judgment or decree applicable to Parent or Merger Sub or
by which any property or asset of either of them is bound or
affected, or (iii) result in any breach of, or constitute a
default (or an event which, with notice or lapse of time or
both, would become a default) under, or give to others any
rights of termination, amendment, acceleration or cancellation
of, or result in the creation of a lien or other encumbrance on
any property or asset of Parent or Merger Sub pursuant to, any
note, bond, mortgage, indenture, contract, agreement, lease,
license, permit, franchise or other instrument or obligation to
which Parent or Merger Sub is a party or by which Parent or
Merger Sub or any property or asset of either of them is bound
or affected, except, with respect to clauses (ii) and
(iii), for any such conflicts, violations, breaches, defaults or
other occurrences which would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
(b) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Parent
and Merger Sub do not, and the performance of this Agreement by
Parent and Merger Sub will not, require any consent, approval,
authorization or permit of, or filing with or notification to,
any Governmental Authority, except (i) for applicable
requirements, if any, of the Exchange Act, Blue Sky Laws and
state takeover laws, the HSR Act and filing and recordation of
appropriate merger documents as required by the CCC, and
(ii) where the failure to obtain such consents, approvals,
authorizations or permits, or to make such filings or
notifications, would not, individually or in the aggregate,
prevent or materially delay consummation of any of the
Transactions or otherwise prevent Parent or Merger Sub from
performing their material obligations under this Agreement.
Section 4.06. Permits;
Compliance. Each of Parent and Merger Sub is in possession
of all franchises, grants, authorizations, licenses, permits,
easements, variances, exceptions, consents, certificates,
approvals and orders of any Governmental Entity necessary for
Parent or Merger Sub to own, lease and operate its properties or
to carry on its business as it is now being conducted (the
Parent Permits), except where the failure to
have, or the suspension or cancellation of, any of the Parent
Permits would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a
Parent Material Adverse Effect. As of the date of this
Agreement, no suspension or cancellation of any of the Parent
Permits is pending or threatened, except where the failure to
have, or the suspension or cancellation of, any of the Parent
Permits would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a
Parent Material Adverse Effect. Neither Parent nor Merger Sub is
in conflict with, or in default, breach or violation of,
(a) any Law applicable to Parent or Merger Sub or by which
any property or asset of Parent or Merger Sub is bound or
affected, or (b) any note, bond, mortgage, indenture,
contract, agreement, lease, license, Parent Permit, franchise or
other instrument or obligation to which Parent or Merger Sub is
a party or by which Parent or Merger Sub or any property or
asset of Parent or Merger Sub is bound, except for any such
conflicts, defaults, breaches or violations that would not,
individually or in the aggregate, have a Parent Material Adverse
Effect.
Section 4.07. ASC
Filings; Financial Statements.
(a) Parent has filed all forms, reports and documents
required to be filed by it with the Alberta Securities
Commission (ASC) since December 31,
2004, and has heretofore previously made available to the
Company, in the form filed with the ASC, (i) the Annual
Information Forms, dated as of March 30, 2005,
March 31, 2004 and May 15, 2003, (ii) the
Management Information Circular for Annual and Special Meeting,
May 10, 2005; and (iii) the 2004, 2003 and 2002 Annual
Reports (the form, reports and other documents referred to in
clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) being collectively,
the Parent Reports). The Parent Reports
(i) complied in all material respects with the requirements
of the Alberta Securities Act and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder, and (ii) did not, at the time they
were filed, or, if amended, as of the date of such amendment,
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements made therein, in the light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, except
that to the extent information as of a later date conflicts with
information of an earlier date, the information of such later
date shall be deemed to modify such earlier information. No
subsidiary of Parent is required to file any form, report or
other document with the ASC.
(b) Each of the consolidated financial statements
(including, in each case, any notes thereto) contained in the
Parent Reports was prepared in accordance with Canadian
generally accepted accounting principles
20
(Canadian GAAP) applied on a consistent basis
(except that unaudited financial statements are subject to
year-end audit adjustments and may not contain notes in full
compliance with Canadian GAAP) throughout the periods indicated
(except as may be indicated in the notes thereto) and each
fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows of
Parent and its consolidated subsidiaries as at the respective
dates thereof and for the respective periods indicated therein.
(c) Except as and to the extent set forth on, or reserved
against, the consolidated balance sheet of Parent and its
consolidated subsidiaries as at December 31, 2004,
including the notes thereto (the Parent 2004 Balance
Sheet), neither the Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries
has any liability or obligation of any nature (whether accrued,
absolute, contingent or otherwise), except for liabilities and
obligations, incurred in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice since December 31, 2004,
which have not had, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent
Material Adverse Effect.
(d) Parent has responded to all comments or requests
received from the ASC or the staff of the ASC since
January 1, 2002 and the ASC or the staff of the ASC, as the
case may be, has not made any supplemental comments or requests
with respect to the matters described therein.
(e) Parent maintains and will continue to maintain a system
of accounting established and administered in accordance with
Canadian GAAP, in all material respects and to the extent
Canadian GAAP is applicable to a system of accounting. Parent
and its subsidiaries maintain a system of internal accounting
controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that
(i) transactions are executed in accordance with
managements general or specific authorizations,
(ii) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in conformity with Canadian
GAAP, (iii) access to assets is permitted only in
accordance with managements general or specific
authorization and (iv) the recorded accountability for
assets is compared with the existing assets at reasonable
intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any
differences.
(f) Accounts receivable, book debts and other debts due or
accruing to Parent and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, and
reflected on the Parent 2004 Balance Sheet or arising
thereafter, have arisen, in al material respects, from
bona fide, arms length transactions between
unrelated parties in the ordinary course of business consistent
with past practice and, subject to an allowance for doubtful
accounts that has been reflected on the books and records of the
Parent and its subsidiaries, as applicable, in accordance with
Canadian GAAP and the regulations of the ASC, which are
collectible without setoff or counterclaim, except as would not,
individually or in the aggregate, have a Parent Material Adverse
Effect.
(g) Accounts payable of Parent and its subsidiaries, taken
as a whole, reflected on the Parent 2004 Balance Sheet or
arising thereafter are, in all material respects, the result of
bona fide transactions in the ordinary course of
business and have been paid or are not yet due or payable. Since
the date of the Parent 2004 Balance Sheet, Parent and its
subsidiaries have not altered in any material respects their
practices for the payment of such accounts payable, including
the timing of such payment, except as would not, individually or
in the aggregate, have a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
(h) The work in progress reflected on the Parent 2004
Balance Sheet was owned by Parent and its subsidiaries on
December 31, 2004. The value of such work in progress at
December 31, 2004 has been recorded appropriately and
represents work in progress that can be invoiced and collected
in the ordinary course of business, except as would not,
individually or in the aggregate, have a Parent Material Adverse
Effect.
(i) Parent and its Subsidiaries have appropriately accrued
project liabilities on its financial statements in accordance
with Canadian GAAP, in all material respects.
(j) Parent and its Subsidiaries have appropriately deferred
the recognition of revenues on projects where amounts have been
invoiced in advance of the underlying work having been completed
in accordance with Canadian GAAP, in all material respects.
Section 4.08. Absence
of Certain Changes or Events. Since December 31, 2004
or as expressly contemplated by this Agreement, (a) Parent
has conducted its business only in the ordinary course and in a
manner consistent with past practice, and (b) there has not
been any Parent Material Adverse Effect.
21
Section 4.09. Absence
of Litigation. Except as specifically disclosed in any
Parent Report filed prior to the date of this Agreement, there
is no Action pending or threatened against Parent or Merger Sub,
or any property or asset of Parent or Merger Sub, before any
Governmental Authority that (a) individually or in the
aggregate, has had or would have a Parent Material Adverse
Effect or (b) seeks to materially delay or prevent the
consummation of the Merger. Neither Parent nor Merger Sub nor
any material property or asset of Parent or Merger Sub is
subject to any continuing order of, consent decree, settlement
agreement or other similar written agreement with, or continuing
investigation by, any Governmental Authority that would,
individually or in the aggregate, have a Parent Material Adverse
Effect.
Section 4.10. Stockholder
Vote. The sole stockholder of Merger Sub has approved this
Agreement and the consummation of the Transactions. No vote of
the stockholders of Parent is required by Law, Parents
Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws or otherwise in order for
Parent and Merger Sub to consummate the Transactions.
Section 4.11. Operations
of Merger Sub. Merger Sub is a direct, wholly owned
subsidiary of Parent, was formed solely for the purpose of
engaging in the Transactions, has engaged in no other business
activities and has conducted its operations only as contemplated
by this Agreement.
Section 4.12. Taxes.
Parent and its subsidiaries have filed all Canadian federal,
provincial, local and non-Canadian Tax returns and reports
required to be filed by them and have paid and discharged all
Taxes required to be paid or discharged, other than such
payments as are being contested in good faith by appropriate
proceedings. All such Tax returns are true, accurate and
complete. Neither the Canada Revenue Agency nor any other
Canadian or non-Canadian taxing authority or agency is now
asserting or threatening to assert against Parent or any
subsidiary any deficiency or claim for any Taxes or interest
thereon or penalties in connection therewith. Neither Parent nor
any subsidiary has granted any waiver of any statute of
limitations with respect to, or any extension of a period for
the assessment of, any Tax. The accruals and reserves for Taxes
reflected in the Parent 2004 Balance Sheet are adequate to cover
all Taxes accruable through such date (including interest and
penalties, if any, thereon) in accordance with Canadian GAAP.
There are no Tax liens upon any property or assets of Parent or
any of the subsidiaries except liens for current Taxes not yet
delinquent. Neither Parent nor any of its affiliates has taken
or agreed to take any action that would prevent the Merger from
qualifying as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code. Parent is not aware of any
agreement, plan or other circumstance that would prevent the
Merger from qualifying as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code. Neither Parent nor any of its
subsidiaries has been required to include in income any
adjustment by reason of a voluntary change in accounting method
initiated by Parent or any of its subsidiaries, and the Canada
Revenue Agency has not initiated or proposed any such adjustment
or change in accounting method, in either case, which adjustment
or change would have a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.13. Board
Approval. The board of directors of each of Parent and
Merger Sub, by resolutions duly adopted by unanimous vote of
those voting at a meeting duly called and held and not
subsequently rescinded or modified in any way, has
(i) determined that this Agreement and the Merger are fair
and in the best interests of Parent and Merger Sub and their
respective stockholders, (ii) approved this Agreement and
Merger, and (iii) in the case of the board of directors of
the Parent, have approved the registration of the Parent Common
Stock to be issued in connection with the Transactions under the
Securities Act and the Exchange Act and the listing of the
Parent Common Stock for trading on the U.S. Exchange.
Section 4.14. [Reserved].
Section 4.15. Ownership
of Company Common Stock. As of the date hereof, neither
Parent nor any of its subsidiaries, owns any Shares.
Section 4.16. Brokers.
No broker, finder or investment banker is entitled to any
brokerage, finders or other fee or commission in
connection with the Transactions based upon arrangements made by
or on behalf of Parent or Merger Sub.
22
Section 4.17. Intellectual
Property. Except as would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Parent Material Adverse Effect, (a) the
conduct of the business of Parent and its subsidiaries as
currently conducted does not infringe upon or misappropriate the
Intellectual Property rights of any third party, and no claim
has been asserted to Parent that the conduct of the business of
Parent and its subsidiaries as currently conducted infringes
upon or may infringe upon or misappropriates the Intellectual
Property Rights of any third party; (b) with respect to
each item of Intellectual Property owned by Parent or a
subsidiary of Parent and material to the business, financial
condition or results of operations of Parent and its
subsidiaries taken as a whole (Parent Owned
Intellectual Property), Parent or a subsidiary of
Parent is the owner of the entire right, title and interest in
and to such Parent Owned Intellectual Property and is entitled
to use such Parent Owned Intellectual Property in the continued
operation of its respective business; (c) with respect to
each item of Intellectual Property licensed to Parent or a
subsidiary of Parent that is material to the business of Parent
and its subsidiaries as currently conducted (Parent
Licensed Intellectual Property), Parent or a
subsidiary of Parent has the right to use such Parent Licensed
Intellectual Property in the continued operation of its business
in accordance with the terms of the license agreement governing
such Parent Licensed Intellectual Property; and (d) Parent
Owned Intellectual Property is valid and enforceable, and has
not been adjudged invalid or unenforceable in whole or in part.
Section 4.18. Environmental
Matters. Except as would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Parent Material Adverse Effect,
(a) neither Parent nor any of its subsidiaries has violated
or is in violation of any Environmental Law; (b) none of
the properties currently or formerly owned, leased or operated
by Parent or any subsidiary of Parent (including, without
limitation, soils and surface and ground waters) are
contaminated with any Hazardous Substance; (c) neither
Parent nor any of its subsidiaries is actually, potentially or
allegedly liable for any off-site contamination by Hazardous
Substances; (d) neither Parent nor any of its subsidiaries
is actually, potentially or allegedly liable under any
Environmental Law (including, without limitation, pending or
threatened liens); (e) each of Parent and its subsidiaries
has all Environmental Permits; and (f) each of the Parent
and its subsidiaries is in compliance with its Environmental
Permits; and (g) neither the execution of this Agreement
nor the consummation of the Merger will require any
investigation, remediation or other action with respect to
Hazardous Substances, or any notice to or consent of
Governmental Authorities or third parties, pursuant to any
applicable Environmental Law or Environmental Permit.
ARTICLE V
CONDUCT OF BUSINESS PENDING THE MERGER
Section 5.01. Conduct
of Business by the Company Pending the Merger. The Company
agrees that, between the date of this Agreement and until the
earlier of the termination of this Agreement or the Effective
Time, except as set forth in Section 5.01 of the Company
Disclosure Schedule or as expressly contemplated by any other
provision of this Agreement, unless Parent shall otherwise
consent in writing (which consent will not be unreasonably
withheld or delayed):
(i) the businesses of the Company and the Subsidiaries
shall be conducted only in, and the Company and the Subsidiaries
shall not take any action except in, the ordinary course of
business and in a manner consistent with past practice; and
(ii) the Company shall use its reasonable best efforts to
preserve substantially intact the business organization of the
Company and the Subsidiaries, to keep available the services of
the current officers, key employees and key consultants of the
Company and the Subsidiaries and to preserve the current
advantageous relationships of the Company and the Subsidiaries
with customers, suppliers and other persons with which the
Company or any Subsidiary has significant business relations.
By way of amplification and not limitation, except as expressly
contemplated by any other provision of this Agreement or as set
forth in Section 5.01 of the Company Disclosure Schedule,
neither the Company nor any Subsidiary shall, between the date
of this Agreement and until the earlier of the termination of
this
23
Agreement or the Effective Time, do, any of the following
without the prior written consent of Parent (which consent will
not be unreasonably withheld or delayed):
(a) amend or otherwise change its Articles of Incorporation
or By-laws or equivalent organizational documents;
(b) (i) issue any shares of any class of capital stock
of the Company or any Subsidiary, or any options, warrants,
convertible securities or other rights of any kind to acquire
any shares of such capital stock, or any other ownership
interest (including, without limitation, any phantom interest),
of the Company or any Subsidiary (except for issuances of Shares
issuable pursuant to Company Stock Awards outstanding on the
date of this Agreement) or (ii) sell, pledge, dispose of,
grant or encumber any material assets of the Company or any
Subsidiary, except in the ordinary course of business and in a
manner consistent with past practice or pursuant to contracts in
force on the date hereof;
(c) declare, set aside, make or pay any dividend or other
distribution, payable in cash, stock, property or otherwise,
with respect to any of its capital stock, except for dividends
by any direct or indirect wholly-owned Subsidiary to the Company
or any other wholly-owned Subsidiary;
(d) reclassify, combine, split, subdivide or redeem, or
purchase or otherwise acquire, directly or indirectly, any of
its capital stock (other than in connection with the cashless
exercise of Company Stock Options outstanding on the date
hereof);
(e) (i) acquire (including, without limitation, by
merger, consolidation, or acquisition of stock or assets or any
other business combination) any corporation, partnership, other
business organization or any division thereof or any material
amount of assets; (ii) incur any indebtedness for borrowed
money or issue any debt securities or assume, guarantee or
endorse, or otherwise become responsible for, the obligations of
any person, or make any loans or advances, or grant any security
interest in any of its material assets except in the ordinary
course of business and consistent with past practice;
(iii) enter into any Material Contract; (iv) authorize
any capital expenditure if, when added to all other capital
expenditures previously recorded in fiscal 2005, the total of
all such capital expenditures would exceed US$4,500,000; or
(v) enter into or amend any contract, agreement, commitment
or arrangement with respect to any matter set forth in this
Section 5.01(e);
(f) hire any additional employees other than in the
ordinary course of business, increase the compensation payable
or to become payable or the benefits provided to its directors,
officers or employees, except for increases in the ordinary
course of business in salaries or wages of employees of the
Company or any Subsidiary who are not directors or officers of
the Company or any Subsidiary, or grant any severance or
termination pay to, or enter into any employment or severance
agreement with, any director, officer or other employee of the
Company or of any Subsidiary, or establish, adopt, enter into or
amend any collective bargaining, bonus, profit-sharing, thrift,
compensation, stock option, restricted stock, pension,
retirement, deferred compensation, employment, termination,
severance or other plan, agreement, trust, fund, policy or
arrangement for the benefit of any current or former director,
officer, employee or consultant;
(g) implement or adopt any change in its accounting
principles, practices or methods, other than as is consistent
with or as may be required by law, GAAP or regulatory guidelines;
(h) make any tax election or settle or compromise any
material United States federal, state, local or non-United
States income tax liability;
(i) pay, discharge or satisfy any claim, liability or
obligation (absolute, accrued, asserted or unasserted,
contingent or otherwise), other than the payment, discharge or
satisfaction of liabilities (i) reflected or reserved
against on the consolidated balance sheet of the Company and the
Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2005, (ii) subsequently
incurred in the ordinary course of business and consistent with
past practice, or (iii) subsequently incurred not in the
ordinary course of business, which shall not in the aggregate
exceed US$100,000;
24
(j) enter into any material amendment to any Material
Contract or consent to the termination of any Material Contract,
or amend, waive, modify or consent to the termination of the
Companys or any Subsidiarys rights thereunder;
(k) commence or settle any material Action; or
(l) announce an intention to, or enter into any agreement
or otherwise make a commitment, to do any of the foregoing.
Section 5.02. Conduct
of Business by Parent Pending the Merger. Except as
expressly contemplated by any other provision of this Agreement,
Parent agrees that from the date of this Agreement until the
earlier of the termination of this Agreement and the Effective
Time, Parent shall not, directly or indirectly, do, or propose
to do, any of the following without the prior written consent of
the Company (which consent will not be unreasonably withheld or
delayed):
(a) engage in any action that could reasonably be expected
to cause the Merger to fail to qualify as a reorganization
within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code;
(b) take any action to cause Parents representations
and warranties set forth in Article IV to be untrue in any
material respect or cause any condition set forth in
Section 7.03(a) and Section 7.03(b) not to be
satisfied; or
(c) take any action that would reasonably be likely to
materially delay the Merger.
ARTICLE VI
ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS
Section 6.01. Registration
Statement; Proxy Statement.
(a) As promptly as practicable after the execution of this
Agreement, (i) Parent and the Company shall prepare the
proxy statement to be sent to the stockholders of the Company
relating to the meeting of the Companys stockholders (the
Company Stockholders Meeting) to be
held to consider approval and adoption of this Agreement or any
information statement to be sent to such stockholders, as
appropriate (such proxy statement or information statement, as
amended or supplemented, being referred to herein as the
Proxy Statement) and (ii) Parent shall
prepare and file with the SEC a registration statement on
Form F-4 (together with all amendments thereto, the
Registration Statement) in which the Proxy
Statement shall be included as a prospectus, in connection with
the registration under the Securities Act of the shares of
Parent Common Stock to be issued to the stockholders of the
Company pursuant to the Merger. Parent and the Company each
shall use their reasonable best efforts to cause the
Registration Statement to become effective as promptly as
practicable, and, prior to the effective date of the
Registration Statement, Parent shall take all or any action
required under any applicable federal or state securities laws
in connection with the issuance of shares of Parent Common Stock
pursuant to the Merger. The Company shall furnish all
information concerning the Company as Parent may reasonably
request in connection with such actions and the preparation of
the Registration Statement and Proxy Statement. As promptly as
practicable after the Registration Statement shall have become
effective, the Company shall mail the Proxy Statement to its
stockholders.
(b) Except as provided in Section 6.04(c) and
Section 8.01(g), the Company covenants that none of the
Company Board or any committee thereof shall withdraw or modify,
or propose to withdraw or modify, in a manner adverse to Parent
or Merger Sub, the approval or recommendation by the Company
Board or any committee thereof of this Agreement, the Merger or
any other Transaction (the Company
Recommendation) and the Proxy Statement shall include
the recommendation of the Company Board to the stockholders of
the Company in favor of approval and adoption of this Agreement
and approval of the Merger.
(c) No amendment or supplement to the Proxy Statement or
the Registration Statement will be made by Parent or the Company
without the approval of the other party (such approval not to be
unreasonably withheld or delayed). Parent and the Company each
will advise the other, promptly after they receive notice
25
thereof, of the time when the Registration Statement has become
effective or any supplement or amendment has been filed, of the
issuance of any stop order, of the suspension of the
qualification of the Parent Common Stock issuable in connection
with the Merger for offering or sale in any jurisdiction, or of
any request by the SEC for amendment of the Proxy Statement or
the Registration Statement or comments thereon and responses
thereto or requests by the SEC for additional information.
(d) Parent represents that the information supplied by
Parent for inclusion in the Registration Statement and the Proxy
Statement shall not, at (i) the time the Registration
Statement is declared effective, (ii) the time the Proxy
Statement (or any amendment thereof or supplement thereto) is
first mailed to the stockholders of the Company, (iii) the
time of the Company Stockholders Meeting and (iv) the
Effective Time, contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or fail to state any material fact required to be stated therein
or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light
of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
If, at any time prior to the Effective Time, any event or
circumstance relating to Parent or Merger Sub, or their
respective officers or directors, should be discovered by Parent
which should be set forth in an amendment or a supplement to the
Registration Statement or Proxy Statement, Parent shall promptly
inform the Company. All documents that Parent is responsible for
filing with the SEC in connection with the Merger or the other
Transactions will comply as to form and substance in all
material aspects with the applicable requirements of the
Securities Act and the rules and regulations thereunder and the
Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.
(e) The Company represents that the information supplied by
the Company for inclusion in the Registration Statement and the
Proxy Statement shall not, at (i) the time the Registration
Statement is declared effective, (ii) the time the Proxy
Statement (or any amendment thereof or supplement thereto) is
first mailed to the stockholders of the Company, (iii) the
time of the Company Stockholders Meeting and (iv) the
Effective Time, contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or fail to state any material fact required to be stated therein
or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light
of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
If, at any time prior to the Effective Time, any event or
circumstance relating to the Company or any Company Subsidiary,
or their respective officers or directors, should be discovered
by the Company which should be set forth in an amendment or a
supplement to the Registration Statement or Proxy Statement, the
Company shall promptly inform Parent. All documents that the
Company is responsible for filing with the SEC in connection
with the Merger or the other Transactions will comply as to form
and substance in all material respects with the applicable
requirements of the Securities Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder and the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder.
Section 6.02. Company
Stockholders Meeting. The Company shall call the
Company Stockholders Meeting as promptly as practicable
for the purpose of voting upon the approval of this Agreement
and the Company shall use its reasonable best efforts to hold
the Company Stockholders Meeting as soon as practicable
after the date on which the Registration Statement becomes
effective. The Company shall use its reasonable best efforts to
solicit from its stockholders proxies in favor of the approval
and adoption of this Agreement and shall use its reasonable best
efforts to take all other action necessary or advisable to
secure the required vote or consent of its stockholders, except
in the event and to the extent that the Company Board, in
accordance with Section 6.04(c), withdraws or modifies its
recommendation to the stockholders of the Company in favor of
the approval and adoption of this Agreement.
Section 6.03. Access
to Information; Confidentiality.
(a) Except pursuant to applicable Law, from the date of
this Agreement until the Effective Time, the Company and Parent
shall (and shall cause their respective subsidiaries to):
(i) provide to the other party (and the other partys
officers, directors, employees, accountants, consultants, legal
counsel, agents and other representatives, collectively,
Representatives) access at reasonable times upon
prior notice to the officers, employees, agents, properties,
offices and other facilities of such party and its subsidiaries
and to the books and records thereof; and (ii) furnish
promptly to the other party such information concerning the
business, properties, contracts, assets, liabilities, personnel
and other aspects of such party and its subsidiaries as the
other party or its Representatives may reasonably request.
26
(b) All information obtained by the parties pursuant to
this Section 6.03 shall be kept confidential in accordance
with the confidentiality agreement, dated February 18, 2005
(the Confidentiality Agreement), between
Parent and the Company.
(c) No investigation pursuant to this Section 6.03
shall affect any representation or warranty in this Agreement of
any party hereto or any condition to the obligations of the
parties hereto.
(d) The Company hereby waives the provisions of the
Confidentiality Agreement as and to the extent necessary to
permit the consummation of each Transaction.
Section 6.04. No
Solicitation of Transactions.
(a) The Company agrees that neither it nor any Subsidiary
nor any of the directors, officers or employees of it or any
Subsidiary will, and that it will not authorize or knowingly
permit its or its Subsidiaries agents, advisors and other
representatives (including, without limitation, any investment
banker, attorney or accountant retained by it or any Subsidiary)
to, directly or indirectly, (i) solicit, initiate or
encourage (including by way of furnishing nonpublic
information), or take any other action to facilitate the making
of any proposal or offer (including, without limitation, any
proposal or offer to its stockholders) that constitutes, or may
reasonably be expected to lead to, a Competing Transaction (as
defined below), or (ii) enter into or maintain or continue
discussions or negotiations with any person or entity in
furtherance of such inquiries or to obtain a proposal or offer
for a Competing Transaction, or (iii) agree to, approve,
endorse or recommend any Competing Transaction or enter into any
letter of intent or other contract, agreement or commitment
contemplating or otherwise relating to any Competing
Transaction. The Company shall notify Parent as promptly as
practicable (and in any event within two (2) days after any
director or executive officer of the Company attains knowledge
thereof), orally and promptly thereafter in writing, if any
proposal or offer, or any inquiry or contact with any person
with respect thereto, regarding a Competing Transaction is made,
specifying the material terms and conditions thereof and the
identity of the party making such proposal or offer or inquiry
or contact (including material amendments or proposed material
amendments). The Company shall provide Parent with 48 hours
prior notice (or such lesser prior notice as is provided to the
members of the Company Board) of any meeting of the Company
Board at which the Company Board is reasonably expected to
consider any Competing Transaction. The Company immediately
shall cease and cause to be terminated all existing discussions
or negotiations with any parties conducted heretofore with
respect to a Competing Transaction. The Company shall not
release any third party from, or waive any provision of, any
confidentiality or standstill agreement to which it is a party.
(b) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Section 6.04, the Company Board may furnish information to,
and enter into discussions with, a person who has made an
unsolicited, written, bona fide proposal or offer regarding a
Competing Transaction, if the Company Board has
(i) determined, in its good faith judgment (after having
received the advice of a financial advisor of nationally
recognized reputation), that such proposal or offer constitutes
a Superior Proposal (as defined below), (ii) determined, in
its good faith judgment after consultation with independent
legal counsel (who may be the Companys regularly engaged
independent legal counsel), that, in light of such Superior
Proposal, the failure to furnish such information or enter into
discussions would cause the members of the Company Board of
Directors to breach their fiduciary duties to the Company and
its stockholders under applicable Law, (iii) provided
written notice to Parent of its intent to furnish information or
enter into discussions with such person at least three
(3) business days prior to taking any such action, and
(iv) obtained from such person an executed confidentiality
agreement on terms no less favorable to the Company than those
contained in the Confidentiality Agreement (it being understood
that such confidentiality agreement and any related agreements
shall not include any provision calling for any exclusive right
to negotiate with such party or having the effect of prohibiting
the Company from satisfying its obligations under this
Agreement).
(c) Except as set forth in this Section 6.04(c),
neither the Company Board nor any committee thereof shall
withdraw or modify, or propose to withdraw or modify, in a
manner adverse to Parent or Merger Sub, the Company
Recommendation (a Change in the Company
Recommendation) or approve or recommend, or cause or
permit the Company to enter into any letter of intent, agreement
or obligation with respect to, any Competing Transaction.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Company Board determines,
in its good faith
27
judgment prior to the time of the Company Stockholders
Meeting and after consultation with independent legal counsel
(who may be the Companys regularly engaged independent
legal counsel), that a failure to make a Change in the Company
Recommendation would cause the members of the Company Board of
Directors to breach their fiduciary duties to the Company and
its stockholders under applicable Law, the Company Board may
(i) recommend a Superior Proposal or (ii) terminate
this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.01(g), but only
(A) after providing written notice to Parent (a
Notice of Superior Proposal) advising Parent
that the Company Board has received a Superior Proposal,
specifying the material terms and conditions of such Superior
Proposal and identifying the person making such Superior
Proposal and indicating that the Company Board intends to effect
a Change in the Company Recommendation and the manner in which
it intends (or may intend) to do so, and (B) if Parent does
not, within three (3) business days of Parents
receipt of the Notice of Superior Proposal, make an offer that
the Company Board determines, in its good faith judgment (after
having received the advice of a financial advisor of
internationally recognized reputation) to be at least as
favorable to the Companys stockholders as such Superior
Proposal. Any disclosure that the Company Board may be compelled
to make with respect to the receipt of a proposal or offer for a
Competing Transaction or otherwise in order to comply with its
fiduciary duties to the Company and its stockholders under
applicable Law or Rule 14d-9 or 14e-2 will not constitute a
violation of this Agreement, provided that such disclosure
states that no action will be taken by the Company Board in
violation of this Section 6.04(c). Notwithstanding anything
to the contrary contained in this Agreement, the obligation of
the Company to call, give notice of, convene and hold the
Company Stockholders Meeting shall not be limited or
otherwise affected by the commencement, disclosure, announcement
or submission to it of any Competing Transaction, or by any
Change in the Company Recommendation. The Company shall not
submit to the vote of its stockholders any Competing
Transaction, or propose to do so at the Company
Stockholders Meeting.
(d) A Competing Transaction means any of
the following (other than the Transactions): (i) any
merger, consolidation, share exchange, business combination,
recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution or other similar
transaction involving the Company or any Subsidiary;
(ii) any sale, lease, exchange, transfer or other
disposition of assets or businesses that constitute or represent
15% or more of the total revenue, operating income, EBITDA or
assets of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole;
(iii) any sale, exchange, transfer or other disposition of
15% or more of any class of equity securities of the Company or
of any Significant Subsidiary (as defined in Rule 1-02 of
Regulation S-X under the Securities Act); (iv) any
tender offer or exchange offer that, if consummated, would
result in any person beneficially owning 15% or more of any
class of equity securities of the Company or of any Significant
Subsidiary; (v) any solicitation in opposition to approval
of this Agreement by the Companys stockholders; or
(vi) any other transaction the consummation of which would
reasonably be expected to prevent or materially delay the Merger.
(e) A Superior Proposal means an
unsolicited written bona fide offer made by a third party to
consummate any of the following transactions: (i) a merger,
consolidation, share exchange, business combination or other
similar transaction involving the Company pursuant to which the
stockholders of the Company immediately preceding such
transaction would hold less than 50% of the equity interest in
the surviving or resulting entity of such transaction; or
(ii) the acquisition by any person or group (including by
means of a tender offer or an exchange offer or a two-step
transaction involving a tender offer followed with reasonable
promptness by a cash-out merger involving the Company), directly
or indirectly, of ownership of 50% of the then outstanding
shares of stock of the Company, in each case on terms (including
conditions to consummation of the contemplated transaction) that
the Company Board determines, in its good faith judgment (after
having received the advice of a financial advisor of nationally
recognized reputation), to be more favorable to the Company
stockholders than the Merger and for which financing, to the
extent required, is then committed.
Section 6.05. Employee
Benefit Matters. From and after the Effective Time, Parent
shall cause the Surviving Corporation and its subsidiaries to
honor in accordance with their terms, all contracts, agreements,
arrangements, policies, plans and commitments of the Company and
the Subsidiaries as in effect immediately prior to the Effective
Time that are applicable to any current or former employees or
directors of the Company or any Subsidiary. Parent shall use
reasonable best efforts to provide that employees of the
28
Company or any Subsidiary receive credit, for purposes of
eligibility to participate and vesting (but not for benefit
accruals) under any employee benefit plan, program or
arrangement established or maintained by the Surviving
Corporation or any of its subsidiaries, for service accrued or
deemed accrued prior to the Effective Time with the Company or
any Subsidiary; provided, however, that such crediting of
service shall not operate to duplicate any benefit or the
funding of any such benefit. In addition, Parent shall use
reasonable best efforts to waive, or cause to be waived, any
limitations on benefits relating to any pre-existing conditions
to the same extent such limitations are waived under any
comparable plan of Parent or its subsidiaries and recognize, for
purposes of annual deductible and out-of-pocket limits under its
medical and dental plans, deductible and out-of-pocket expenses
paid by employees of the Company and its subsidiaries in the
calendar year in which the Effective Time occurs.
Section 6.06. Directors
and Officers Indemnification and Insurance.
(a) The By-laws of the Surviving Corporation shall contain
provisions no less favorable, taken as a whole, with respect to
indemnification than are set forth in Article VI of the
By-laws of the Company, which provisions shall not be amended,
repealed or otherwise modified for a period of six years from
the Effective Time in any manner that would affect adversely the
rights thereunder of individuals who, at or prior to the
Effective Time, were directors, officers, employees, fiduciaries
or agents of the Company, unless such modification shall be
required by law.
(b) The Surviving Corporation shall use its reasonable best
efforts to maintain in effect for six years from the Effective
Time, if available, the current directors and
officers liability insurance policies maintained by the
Company (provided that the Surviving Corporation may substitute
therefor policies of at least the same coverage containing terms
and conditions that are not materially less favorable) with
respect to matters occurring prior to the Effective Time;
provided, however, that in no event shall the Surviving
Corporation be required to expend pursuant to this
Section 6.06(b) more than an amount per year equal to 175%
of current annual premiums paid by the Company for such
insurance (which premiums the Company represents and warrants to
be US$131,920 in the aggregate); provided, however, that in the
event of an expiration, termination or cancellation of such
current policies, Merger Sub or the Surviving Corporation shall
be required to obtain as much coverage as is possible under
substantially similar policies for aggregate annual premiums
which shall not exceed 175% of current annual premiums paid by
the Company for such insurance.
(c) In the event the Surviving Corporation or any of its
successors or assigns (i) consolidates with or merges into
any other person and shall not be the continuing or surviving
corporation or entity of such consolidation or merger or
(ii) transfers all or substantially all of its properties
and assets to any person, then, and in each such case, proper
provision shall be made so that the successors and assigns of
the Surviving Corporation or at Parents option, Parent,
shall assume the obligations set forth in this Section 6.06.
(d) Parent and Merger Sub acknowledge that the Company is
party to indemnification agreements with each director and
executive officer of the Company and that at the Effective Time
the Companys obligations under such indemnification
agreements shall become the obligations of the Surviving
Corporation.
Section 6.07. Notification
of Certain Matters. The Company shall give prompt notice to
Parent, and Parent shall give prompt notice to the Company, of
(a) the occurrence, or non-occurrence, of any event the
occurrence, or non-occurrence, of which could reasonably be
expected to cause any representation or warranty contained in
this Agreement to be untrue or inaccurate in any material
respect and (b) any failure of the Company, Parent or
Merger Sub, as the case may be, to comply with or satisfy any
covenant or agreement to be complied with or satisfied by it
hereunder; provided, however, that the delivery of any
notice pursuant to this Section 6.07 shall not limit or
otherwise affect the remedies available hereunder to the party
receiving such notice.
Section 6.08. Company
Affiliates.
(a) No later than 30 days after the date of this
Agreement, the Company shall deliver to Parent a list of names
and addresses of those persons who were, in the Companys
reasonable judgment, on such date, affiliates (within the
meaning of Rule 145 of the rules and regulations
promulgated under the Securities Act (each such person being a
Company Affiliate)) of the Company. The
Company shall provide Parent with
29
such information and documents as Parent shall reasonably
request for purposes of reviewing such list. The Company shall
use its reasonable best efforts to deliver or cause to be
delivered to Parent, prior to the Effective time, an affiliate
letter in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 6.08,
executed by each of the Company Affiliates identified in the
foregoing list and any person who shall, to the knowledge of the
Company, have become a Company Affiliate subsequent to the
delivery of such list.
(b) Parent agrees that it shall make available
current public information in accordance with
Rule 144(c) under the Securities Act for a period of two
years from the Effective Time. Parent further agrees that it
shall cooperate with each Company Affiliate to remove the legend
from Parent Common Stock received by such Company Affiliate as
Merger Consideration and sold by such Company Affiliate in
accordance with Rule 145(d) under the Securities Act.
Section 6.09. Further
Action; Reasonable Best Efforts. Upon the terms and subject
to the conditions of this Agreement, each of the parties hereto
shall (i) make promptly its respective filings, and
thereafter make any other required submissions, under the HSR
Act or other applicable foreign, federal or state antitrust,
competition of fair trade Laws with respect to the Transactions
and (ii) use its reasonable best efforts to take, or cause
to be taken, all appropriate action, and to do, or cause to be
done, all things necessary, proper or advisable under applicable
Laws or otherwise to consummate and make effective the
Transactions, including, without limitation, using its
reasonable best efforts to obtain all Permits, consents,
approvals, authorizations, qualifications and orders of
Governmental Authorities and parties to contracts with the
Company and the Subsidiaries as are necessary for the
consummation of the Transactions and to fulfill the conditions
to the Merger; provided that neither Merger Sub nor
Parent will be required by this Section 6.09 to take any
action, including entering into any consent decree, hold
separate orders or other arrangements, that (A) requires
the divestiture of any assets of any of Merger Sub, Parent, the
Company or any of their respective subsidiaries or
(B) limits Parents freedom of action with respect to,
or its ability to retain, the Company and the Subsidiaries or
any portion thereof or any of Parents or its
affiliates other assets or businesses. In case, at any
time after the Effective Time, any further action is necessary
or desirable to carry out the purposes of this Agreement, the
proper officers and directors of each party to this Agreement
shall use their reasonable best efforts to take all such action.
Section 6.10. Plan
of Reorganization.
(a) Subject to Section 2.01(k), this Agreement is
intended to constitute a plan of reorganization
within the meaning of section 1.368-2(g) of the income tax
regulations promulgated under the Code. From and after the date
of this Agreement and until the Effective Time, each party
hereto shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause the Merger
to qualify, and will not knowingly take any action, cause any
action to be taken, fail to take any action or cause any action
to fail to be taken which action or failure to act could prevent
the Merger from qualifying, as a reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. Following the
Effective Time, neither the Surviving Corporation, Parent nor
any of their affiliates shall knowingly take any action, cause
any action to be taken, fail to take any action or cause any
action to fail to be taken, which action or failure to act could
cause the Merger to fail to qualify as a reorganization within
the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.
(b) As of the date hereof, the Company does not know of any
reason (i) why it would not be able to deliver to counsel
to the Company and Parent at the date of the legal opinions
referred to below, certificates substantially in compliance with
IRS published advance ruling guidelines, with customary
exceptions and modifications thereto, to enable such firms to
deliver the legal opinions contemplated by Section 7.02(j)
and Section 7.03(e), and the Company hereby agrees, subject
to Section 2.01(k), to deliver such certificates effective
as of the date of such opinions or (ii) why counsel to the
Company and Parent would not be able to deliver the opinions
required by Section 7.02(j) and Section 7.03(e).
Subject to Section 2.01(k), the Company will deliver such
certificates to counsel to the Company and Parent.
(c) As of the date hereof, Parent does not know of any
reason (i) why it would not be able to deliver to counsel
to the Company or Parent at the date of the legal opinions
referred to below, certificates substantially in compliance with
IRS published advance ruling guidelines, with customary
exceptions and modifications thereto, to enable such firms to
deliver the legal opinions contemplated by Section 7.02(j)
and
30
Section 7.03(e), and Parent hereby agrees, subject to
Section 2.01(k), to deliver such certificates effective as
of the date of such opinions or (ii) why counsel to the
Company and Parent would not be able to deliver the opinions
required by Section 7.02(j) and Section 7.03(e).
Subject to Section 2.01(k), Parent will deliver such
certificates to counsel to the Company and Parent.
Section 6.11. Obligations
of Merger Sub. Parent shall take all action necessary to
cause Merger Sub to perform its obligations under this Agreement
and to consummate the Merger on the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth in this Agreement.
Section 6.12. Consents
of Accountants. Parent and the Company will each use all
reasonable efforts to cause to be delivered to each other
consents from their respective independent auditors, in form
reasonably satisfactory to the recipient and customary in scope
and substance for consents delivered by independent public
accountants in connection with registration statements on
Form F-4 under the Securities Act.
Section 6.13. Listing.
Parent shall promptly prepare and submit to (i) either the
New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) or the
National Market System of the NASDAQ Stock Market
(Nasdaq and, together with the NYSE, the
U.S. Exchange) and (ii) the TSX,
listing applications covering the shares of Parent Common Stock
to be issued in the Merger and shall use its reasonable efforts
to obtain, prior to the Effective Time, approval for the listing
or quotation, as the case may be, of such Parent Common Stock by
the U.S. Exchange and the TSX, subject in each case to
official notice of issuance, and the Company shall cooperate
with Parent with respect to such listing or quotation, as the
case may be.
Section 6.14. Subsequent
Financial Statements. The Company shall, if practicable,
consult with Parent prior to making publicly available its
financial results for any period after the date of this
Agreement and prior to filing any report or document with the
SEC after the date of this Agreement, it being understood that
Parent shall have no liability by reason of such consultation.
Section 6.15. Public
Announcements. The initial press release relating to this
Agreement shall be a joint press release the text of which has
been agreed to by each of Parent and the Company. Thereafter,
unless otherwise required by applicable Law or the requirements
of the U.S. Exchange or the TSX, each of Parent and the
Company shall each use its reasonable best efforts to consult
with each other before issuing any press release or otherwise
making any public statements with respect to this Agreement, the
Merger or any of the other Transactions.
Section 6.16. Board
of Directors of Parent. Parent shall take all such action as
may be necessary to cause the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company (the Company Designated Director) to
be appointed to the Board of Directors of Parent as of the first
meeting of the Board of Directors of Parent after the Effective
Time, to serve until the next annual election of directors of
Parent.
Section 6.17. Company
Contribution. Immediately prior to the Effective Time, at
Parents request, Company shall deposit, or shall cause to
be deposited, with the Exchange Agent for the benefit of the
holders of Shares the lesser of (i) $18,000,000 and
(ii) the maximum amount of cash that would not preclude the
Merger from qualifying as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code.
Section 6.18. Unvested
Company Restricted Stock. The Company will cooperate to
enter into an agreement with each holder of an unvested Company
Restricted Stock to amend the agreement between the Company and
such holder pursuant to which such unvested Company Restricted
Stock was granted and such amendment shall be reasonably
satisfactory to Parent.
31
ARTICLE VII
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER
Section 7.01. Conditions
to the Obligations of Each Party. The obligations of the
Company, Parent and Merger Sub to consummate the Merger are
subject to the satisfaction or waiver (where permissible) of the
following conditions:
|
|
|
(a) Registration Statement. The Registration
Statement shall have been declared effective by the SEC under
the Securities Act and no stop order suspending the
effectiveness of the Registration Statement shall have been
issued by the SEC and no proceeding for that purpose shall have
been initiated by the SEC. |
|
|
(b) Company Stockholder Approval. This Agreement
shall have been approved and adopted by the requisite
affirmative vote of the stockholders of the Company in
accordance with the CCC and the Companys Articles of
Incorporation. |
|
|
(c) No Order. No Governmental Authority shall have
enacted, issued, promulgated, enforced or entered any law, rule,
regulation, judgment, decree, executive order or award (an
Order) which is then in effect and has the effect of
making the Merger illegal or otherwise prohibiting consummation
of the Merger. |
|
|
(d) U.S. Antitrust Approvals and Waiting
Periods. Any waiting period (and any extension thereof)
applicable to the consummation of the Merger under the HSR Act
shall have expired or been terminated. |
|
|
(e) TSX Listing. The shares of Parent Common Stock
to be issued in the Merger shall have been authorized for
listing on the TSX, subject to official notice of issuance. |
Section 7.02. Conditions
to the Obligations of Parent and Merger Sub. The obligations
of Parent and Merger Sub to consummate the Merger are subject to
the satisfaction or waiver (where permissible) of the following
additional conditions:
|
|
|
(a) Representations and Warranties. The
representations and warranties of the Company contained in this
Agreement shall have been true and correct when made and shall
be true and correct as of the Effective Time, with the same
force and effect as if made as of the Effective Time (other than
such representations and warranties as are made as of another
date which shall be true and correct as of such date), except
where the failure to be so true and correct (without giving
effect to any limitations or qualification as to
materially (including the word material)
or Company Material Adverse Effect set forth
therein) would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a
Company Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(b) Agreements and Covenants. The Company shall have
performed or complied in all material respects with all
agreements and covenants required by this Agreement to be
performed or complied with by it on or prior to the Effective
Time. |
|
|
(c) Officer Certificate. The Company shall have
delivered to Parent a certificate, dated the date of the
Closing, signed by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifying as to the satisfaction of the conditions specified in
Sections 7.02(a), 7.02(b) and 7.02(e). |
|
|
(d) Consents. All consents, approvals and
authorizations legally required to be obtained to consummate the
Merger shall have been obtained from and made with all
Governmental Entities. |
|
|
(e) Material Adverse Effect. No Company Material
Adverse Effect shall have occurred since the date of this
Agreement. |
|
|
(f) Company Contribution. The Company shall have
deposited, or shall have caused to be deposited, with the
Exchange Agent for the benefit of the holders of the Company
Common Stock the lesser of (i) $18,000,000 and
(ii) the maximum amount of cash that would not preclude the
Merger from qualifying as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code. |
32
|
|
|
(g) Company Cash Balance. The Company shall have at
least $40,000,000 of cash on deposit in cash or cash
equivalents, less the amount of cash deposited with the Exchange
Agent pursuant to Section 2.04 and Section 7.02(f). |
|
|
(h) Dissenting Shares. The number of Dissenting
Shares shall be less than 5% of the issued and outstanding
Shares. |
|
|
(i) Cancellation of Company 401(k) Plan. Prior to
the Effective Time, the Company Board shall have duly adopted a
resolution providing for the termination and cancellation, as of
the day immediately preceding the date on which the Effective
Time occurs, of the Companys Plan qualified under
Section 401(k) of the Code (the 401(k)
Plan) and provided a certified copy of such resolution
to Parent, which is reasonably satisfactory to Parent.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board of Directors of the
Company shall not act to terminate and cancel the 401(k) Plan if
Parent provides written notice to that effect to the Company at
least two (2) days prior to the Effective Time. |
|
|
(j) Taxes. Subject to Section 2.01(k), Parent
shall have received the opinion of Shearman & Sterling
LLP, counsel to Parent, based upon representations of Parent and
the Company, and normal assumptions, to the effect that, for
federal income tax purposes, the Merger will qualify as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code and that each of Parent, Merger Sub and the Company will be
a party to the reorganization within the meaning
Section 368(b) of the Code, which opinion shall not have
been withdrawn or modified in any material respect. The issuance
of such opinion shall be conditioned on receipt by
Shearman & Sterling LLP of representation letters from
each of Parent and Company contemplated in Section 6.10.
Each such representation letter shall be dated on or before the
date of such opinion and shall not have been withdrawn or
modified in any material respect as of the Effective Time. |
Section 7.03. Conditions
to the Obligations of the Company. The obligations of the
Company to consummate the Merger are subject to the satisfaction
or waiver (where permissible) of the following additional
conditions:
|
|
|
(a) Representations and Warranties. The
representations and warranties of Parent and Merger Sub
contained in this Agreement shall have been true and correct
when made and shall be true and correct as of the Effective
Time, with the same force and effect as if made as of the
Effective Time (other than such representations and warranties
as are made as of another date which shall be true and correct
as of such date), except where the failure to be so true and
correct (without giving effect to any limitations or
qualification as to materially (including the word
material) or Parent Material Adverse
Effect set forth therein) would not, individually or in
the aggregate, have a Parent Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(b) Agreements and Covenants. Parent and Merger Sub
shall have performed or complied in all material respects with
all agreements and covenants required by this Agreement to be
performed or complied with by it on or prior to the Effective
Time. |
|
|
(c) Material Adverse Effect. No Parent Material
Adverse Effect shall have occurred since the date of this
Agreement. |
|
|
(d) Officer Certificate. Parent shall have delivered
to the Company a certificate, dated the date of the Closing,
signed by the President or any Vice President of Parent,
certifying as to the satisfaction of the conditions specified in
Sections 7.03(a), 7.03(b) and 7.03(c). |
|
|
(e) Taxes. Subject to Section 2.01(k), the
Company shall have received the opinion of Akin Gump Strauss
Hauer & Feld LLP, counsel to the Company, based upon
representations of Parent and the Company, and normal
assumptions, to the effect that, for federal income tax
purposes, the Merger will qualify as a reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code and that each of
Parent, Merger Sub and the Company will be a party to the
reorganization within the meaning Section 368(b) of the
Code, which opinion shall not have been withdrawn or modified in
any material respect. The issuance of such opinion shall be
conditioned on receipt by Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &
Feld LLP of representation letters from each of Parent and
Company contemplated in Section 6.10. Each such |
33
|
|
|
representation letter shall be dated on or before the date of
such opinion and shall not have been withdrawn or modified in
any material respect as of the Effective Time. |
|
|
(f) U.S. Exchange Listing. The shares of Parent
Common Stock to be issued in the Merger shall have been
authorized for listing or quotation, as the case may be, on the
U.S. Exchange, subject to official notice of issuance. |
ARTICLE VIII
TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER
Section 8.01. Termination.
This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger and the other
Transactions may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective
Time by action taken or authorized by the Board of Directors of
the terminating party, notwithstanding any requisite approval
and adoption of this Agreement and the Transactions by the
stockholders of the Company, as follows:
(a) by mutual written consent of Parent and the Company
duly authorized by the Boards of Directors of Parent and the
Company; or
(b) by either Parent or the Company if the Effective Time
shall not have occurred on or before December 31, 2005;
provided, however, that the right to terminate
this Agreement under this Section 8.01(b) shall not be
available to any party whose failure to fulfill any obligation
under this Agreement has been the cause of, or resulted in, the
failure of the Effective Time to occur on or before such
date; or
(c) by Parent if a Company Triggering Event (as defined
below) shall have occurred; or
(d) by either Parent or the Company if this Agreement shall
fail to receive the requisite vote for approval at the Company
Stockholders Meeting; or
(e) by Parent upon a breach of any representation,
warranty, covenant or agreement on the part of the Company set
forth in this Agreement, or if any representation or warranty of
the Company shall have become untrue, in either case such that
the conditions set forth in Section 7.02(a) and
Section 7.02(b) would not be satisfied as of the time of
such breach or as of the time such representation or warranty
shall have become untrue (Terminating Company
Breach); provided, however, that, if
such Terminating Company Breach is curable by the Company,
Parent may not terminate this Agreement under this
Section 8.01(e) for so long as the Company continues to
exercise its best efforts to cure such breach, unless such
breach is not cured within 15 days after written notice of
such breach is provided by Parent to the Company; or
(f) by the Company upon a breach of any representation,
warranty, covenant or agreement on the part of Parent and Merger
Sub set forth in this Agreement, or if any representation or
warranty of Parent and Merger Sub shall have become untrue, in
either case such that the conditions set forth in
Section 7.03(a) and Section 7.03(b) would not be
satisfied as of the time of such breach or as of the time such
representation or warranty shall have become untrue
(Terminating Parent Breach); provided,
however, that, if such Terminating Parent Breach is
curable by Parent and Merger Sub, the Company may not terminate
this Agreement under this Section 8.01(f) for so long as
Parent and Merger Sub continue to exercise their best efforts to
cure such breach, unless such breach is not cured within
15 days after written notice of such breach is provided by
the Company to Parent.
(g) by the Company in order to accept a Superior Proposal;
provided, however, in order for the termination of
this Agreement pursuant to this paragraph 8.01(g) to be
effective, the Company shall have complied with the provisions
of Section 6.04(c) and the provisions of
Section 8.03(b) (including the payment of the Fee and
Parents Expenses).
For purposes of this Agreement, a Company Triggering
Event shall be deemed to have occurred if:
(i) the Company Board withdraws, modifies or changes the
Company Recommendation in a manner adverse to Parent or shall
have resolved to do so; (ii) the Company Board shall have
recommended to the stockholders of the Company a Competing
Transaction or shall have resolved to do so or shall have
entered into any letter of intent or similar document or any
agreement, contract or commitment accepting any Competing
34
Transaction; (iii) the Company shall have failed to include
in the Proxy Statement the recommendation of the Company Board
in favor of the approval of this Agreement; (iv) the
Company Board fails to reaffirm its recommendation in favor of
the approval of this Agreement and the approval of the Merger
within five business days after Parent requests in writing that
such recommendation be reaffirmed; (v) as a result of the
Companys breach of its obligation hereunder, the Merger is
not, prior to December 15, 2005, submitted for the approval
of the holders of Company Common Stock at the Company
Stockholders Meeting; (vi) the Company shall have
intentionally breached its obligations under Section 6.04;
or (vii) a tender offer or exchange offer for 15% or more
of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company is
commenced, and the Company Board fails to recommend against
acceptance of such tender offer or exchange offer by its
stockholders (including by taking no position with respect to
the acceptance of such tender offer or exchange offer by its
stockholders) within ten (10) business days after such
tender offer or exchange offer is commenced.
Section 8.02. Effect
of Termination. In the event of the termination of this
Agreement pursuant to Section 8.01, this Agreement shall
forthwith become void, and there shall be no liability under
this Agreement on the part of any party hereto, except
(a) as set forth in Section 8.03 and (b) nothing
herein shall relieve any party from liability for any willful
breach of any of its representations, warranties, covenants or
agreements set forth in this Agreement prior to such
termination; provided, however, that the
Confidentiality Agreement shall survive any termination of this
Agreement.
Section 8.03. Fees
and Expenses.
(a) Except as set forth in this Section 8.03, all
Expenses (as defined below) incurred in connection with this
Agreement and the Transactions shall be paid by the party
incurring such expenses, whether or not the Merger or any other
transaction is consummated, except that the Company and Parent
shall each pay one-half of all Expenses relating to
(i) printing, filing and mailing the Registration Statement
and the Proxy Statement and all SEC and other regulatory filing
fees incurred in connection with the Registration Statement and
the Proxy Statement and (ii) the filing fee for the
Notification and Report Forms filed under HSR Act.
Expenses, as used in this Agreement, shall include
all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses (including, without
limitation, all fees and expenses of counsel, accountants,
investment bankers, experts and consultants to a party hereto
and its affiliates) incurred by a party or on its behalf in
connection with or related to the authorization, preparation,
negotiation, execution and performance of this Agreement, the
preparation, printing, filing and mailing of the Registration
Statement and the Proxy Statement, the solicitation of
stockholder approvals, the filing of any required notices under
the HSR Act or other similar regulations and all other matters
related to the closing of the Merger and the other Transactions.
(b) The Company agrees that:
|
|
|
(i) if Parent shall terminate this Agreement pursuant to
Section 8.01(c); or |
|
|
(ii) if the Company shall terminate this Agreement pursuant
to Section 8.01(g); |
then the Company shall pay to Parent promptly (but in any event
no later than one business day after the first of such events
shall have occurred) a fee of US$3,000,000 (the
Fee), which amount shall be payable in
immediately available funds, plus an amount equal to the amount
of Parents Expenses.
(c) The Company acknowledges that the agreements contained
in this Section 8.03 are an integral part of the
Transactions. In the event that the Company shall fail to pay
the Fee or any Expenses when due, the term Expenses
shall be deemed to include the costs and expenses actually
incurred or accrued by Parent (including, without limitation,
fees and expenses of counsel) in connection with the collection
under and enforcement of this Section 8.03, together with
interest on such unpaid Fee and Expenses, commencing on the date
that the Fee or such Expenses became due, at a rate equal to the
rate of interest publicly announced by Citibank, N.A., from time
to time, in The City of New York, as such banks Prime Rate
plus 2.00%. Payment of the fees and expenses described in this
Section 8.03 shall not be in lieu of any damages incurred
in the event of willful or intentional breach of this Agreement.
35
Section 8.04. Amendment.
This Agreement may be amended by the parties hereto by action
taken by or on behalf of their respective Boards of Directors at
any time prior to the Effective Time; provided,
however, that, after the approval of this Agreement by
the stockholders of the Company, no amendment may be made that
would reduce the amount or change the type of consideration into
which each Share shall be converted upon consummation of the
Merger without the approval of the Stockholders of the Company.
This Agreement may not be amended except by an instrument in
writing signed by each of the parties hereto.
Section 8.05. Waiver.
At any time prior to the Effective Time, any party hereto may
(a) extend the time for the performance of any obligation
or other act of any other party hereto, (b) waive any
inaccuracy in the representations and warranties of any other
party contained herein or in any document delivered pursuant
hereto and (c) waive compliance with any agreement of any
other party or any condition to its own obligations contained
herein. Any such extension or waiver shall be valid if set forth
in an instrument in writing signed by the party or parties to be
bound thereby.
ARTICLE IX
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 9.01. Non
Survival of Representations, Warranties and Agreements. The
representations, warranties and agreements in this Agreement and
in any certificate delivered pursuant hereto shall terminate at
the Effective Time or upon the termination of this Agreement
pursuant to Section 8.01, as the case may be, except that
the agreements set forth in Articles I and II and
Sections 6.03(b), 6.06, 6.10, 8.03 and this Article IX
shall survive the Effective Time.
Section 9.02. Notices.
All notices, requests, claims, demands and other communications
hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given (and shall be
deemed to have been duly given upon receipt) by delivery in
person, by telecopy or by registered or certified mail (postage
prepaid, return receipt requested) to the respective parties at
the following addresses (or at such other address for a party as
shall be specified in a notice given in accordance with this
Section 9.02):
if to Parent or Merger Sub:
|
|
|
Stantec Inc. |
|
10160 112 Street |
|
Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2L6 |
|
Canada |
|
Attention: Jeffrey S. Lloyd |
|
Facsimile No: (780) 917-7330 |
|
Email: jlloyd@stantec.com |
with a copy to:
|
|
|
Shearman & Sterling LLP |
|
Commerce Court West |
|
Suite 4405, P.O. Box 247 |
|
Toronto, Canada M5L 1E8 |
|
Attention: Christopher J. Cummings, Esq. |
|
Facsimile No: (416) 360 2958 |
|
Email: ccummings@shearman.com |
36
if to the Company:
|
|
|
The Keith Companies, Inc. |
|
19 Technology Drive |
|
Irvine, CA 92618 |
|
U.S.A. |
|
Attention: Aram H. Keith |
|
Facsimile No: (949) 923-6026 |
|
Email: aram.keith@keithco.com |
with a copy to:
|
|
|
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP |
|
2029 Century Park East |
|
Suite 2400 |
|
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3012 |
|
Attention: C.N. Franklin Reddick III, Esq. |
|
Facsimile No: (310) 229 1001 |
|
Email: freddick@akingump.com |
Section 9.03. Certain
Definitions.
(a) For purposes of this Agreement:
affiliate of a specified person means a
person who, directly or indirectly through one or more
intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common
control with, such specified person.
beneficial owner, with respect to any Shares,
has the meaning ascribed to such term under Rule 13d-3(a)
of the Exchange Act.
business day means any day on which the
principal offices of the SEC in Washington, D.C. are open
to accept filings, or, in the case of determining a date when
any payment is due, any day on which banks are not required or
authorized to close in The City of New York.
Company Material Adverse Effect means any
event, circumstance, change or effect that, individually or in
the aggregate with all other events, circumstances, changes and
effects, is or is reasonably likely to be materially adverse to
(i) the business, prospects, condition (financial or
otherwise), assets, liabilities or results of operations of the
Company and the Subsidiaries taken as a whole or (ii) the
ability of the Company to consummate the Transactions;
provided, however, that Company Material Adverse
Effect (i) shall not include any event, circumstance,
change or effect resulting from (x) changes in general
economic, regulatory or political conditions (including, without
limitation, acts of war or terrorism) or changes in securities
markets in general that do not have a materially
disproportionate effect (relative to other industry
participants) on the Company or its Subsidiaries,
(y) general changes in the industries in which the Company
and the Subsidiaries operate, except those events,
circumstances, changes or effects that adversely affect the
Company and its subsidiaries to a materially greater extent than
they affect other entities operating in such industries or
(z) the execution, announcement or consummation of this
Agreement and the Transactions, including the impact thereof on
relationships, contractual or otherwise, with customers,
suppliers or employees.
control (including the terms
controlled by and under common
control with) means the possession, directly or
indirectly, or as trustee or executor, of the power to direct or
cause the direction of the management and policies of a person,
whether through the ownership of voting securities, as trustee
or executor, by contract or credit arrangement or otherwise.
Environmental Laws means any United States
federal, state or local or non-United States laws relating to
(i) releases or threatened releases of Hazardous Substances
or materials containing Hazardous Substances; (ii) the
manufacture, handling, transport, use, treatment, storage or
disposal of Hazardous Substances or materials containing
Hazardous Substances; or (iii) pollution or protection of
the environment, health, safety or natural resources.
37
Hazardous Substances means (i) those
substances defined in or regulated under the following United
States federal statutes and their state counterparts, as each
may be amended from time to time, and all regulations
thereunder: the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, the
Clean Water Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Atomic Energy
Act, the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act and
the Clean Air Act; (ii) petroleum and petroleum products,
including crude oil and any fractions thereof;
(iii) natural gas, synthetic gas, and any mixtures thereof;
(iv) polychlorinated biphenyls, asbestos and radon;
(v) any other contaminant; and (vi) any substance,
material or waste regulated by any Governmental Authority
pursuant to any Environmental Law.
Intellectual Property means (i) United
States, non-United States and international patents, patent
applications and statutory invention registrations,
(ii) trademarks, service marks, trade dress, logos, trade
names, corporate names and other source identifiers, and
registrations and applications for registration thereof,
(iii) copyrightable works, copyrights, and registrations
and applications for registration thereof, and
(iv) confidential and proprietary information, including
trade secrets and know-how.
knowledge of the Company means the actual
knowledge of any of the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief
Financial Officer, the Chief Operating Officer or the General
Counsel of the Company, after due investigation.
knowledge of Parent and Merger Sub means the
actual knowledge of any executive officer of Parent, after due
investigation.
liens means mortgages, pledges, liens,
security interest, conditional and installment sale agreements,
encumbrances, charges or other claims of third parties of any
kind, including, without limitation, any easement, right of way
or other encumbrance to title, or any option, right of first
refusal, or right of first offer, other than (A) liens for
current taxes and assessments not yet past due,
(B) inchoate mechanics and materialmens liens
arising in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice.
Parent Material Adverse Effect means any
event, circumstance, change or effect that, individually or in
the aggregate with all other events, circumstances, changes and
effects, is or is reasonably likely to be materially adverse to
(i) the business, prospects, condition (financial or
otherwise), assets, liabilities or results of operations of
Parent and its subsidiaries taken as a whole or (ii) the
ability of Parent to consummate the Transactions;
provided, however, that Parent Material Adverse
Effect clause (i) shall not include any event,
circumstance, change or effect resulting from (x) changes
in general economic, regulatory or political conditions
(including without, limitation, acts of war or terrorism) or
changes in securities markets in general that do not have a
materially disproportionate effect (relative to other industry
participants) on Parent or its subsidiaries, (y) general
changes in the industries in which Parent and its subsidiaries
operate, except those events, circumstances, changes or effects
that adversely affect Parent and its subsidiaries to a
materially greater extent than they affect other entities
operating in such industries or (z) the execution,
announcement or consummation of this Agreement and the
Transactions, including the impact thereof on relationships,
contractual or otherwise, with customers, suppliers or employees.
person means an individual, corporation,
partnership, limited partnership, limited liability company,
syndicate, person (including, without limitation, a
person as defined in Section 13(d)(3) of the
Exchange Act), trust, association or entity or government,
political subdivision, agency or instrumentality of a government.
subsidiary or subsidiaries of the
Company, the Surviving Corporation, Parent or any other person
means an affiliate controlled by such person, directly or
indirectly, through one or more intermediaries.
Taxes shall mean any and all taxes, fees,
levies, duties, tariffs, imposts and other charges of any kind
(together with any and all interest, penalties, additions to tax
and additional amounts imposed with respect thereto) imposed by
any Governmental Authority or taxing authority, including,
without limitation: taxes or other charges on or with respect to
income, franchise, windfall or other profits, gross receipts,
property, sales, use, capital stock, payroll, employment, social
security, workers compensation, unemployment compensation
or net worth; taxes or other charges in the nature of excise,
withholding, ad valorem, stamp, transfer, value-
38
added or gains taxes; license, registration and documentation
fees; and customers duties, tariffs and similar charges.
(b) The following terms have the meaning set forth in the
Sections set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Term |
|
Location of Definition | |
|
|
| |
Action
|
|
|
§3.09 |
|
affiliate
|
|
|
§2.09 |
|
Aggregate Cash Amount
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(b) |
Aggregate Stock Amount
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(b) |
ASC
|
|
|
§4.07 |
(a) |
Average Stock Price
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(a) |
Agreement
|
|
|
Preamble |
|
Blue Sky Laws
|
|
|
§3.05 |
(b) |
Canadian GAAP
|
|
|
§4.07 |
(b) |
Cash Election
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(e) |
Cash Election Share
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(e) |
Cash Payment
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(a) |
CCC
|
|
|
Recitals |
|
Certificate of Merger
|
|
|
§1.02 |
|
Certificates
|
|
|
§2.02 |
(b) |
Change in the Company Recommendation
|
|
|
§6.04 |
(c) |
Closing
|
|
|
§1.02 |
|
Code
|
|
|
Recitals |
|
Company
|
|
|
Preamble |
|
Company Affiliate
|
|
|
§6.08 |
|
Company Board
|
|
|
Recitals |
|
Company Common Stock
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(a) |
Company Designated Director
|
|
|
§6.16 |
|
Company Disclosure Schedule
|
|
|
Article III |
|
Company Licensed Intellectual Property
|
|
|
§3.13 |
(a) |
Company Owned Intellectual Property
|
|
|
§3.13 |
(a) |
Company Permits
|
|
|
§3.06 |
|
Company Preferred Stock
|
|
|
§3.03 |
(a) |
Company Recommendation
|
|
|
§6.01 |
(b) |
Company Restricted Stock
|
|
|
§2.05 |
|
Company SEC Reports
|
|
|
§3.07 |
(a) |
Company Stock Awards
|
|
|
§3.03 |
(a) |
Company Stock Options
|
|
|
§2.04 |
(a) |
Company Stock Option Plans
|
|
|
§2.04 |
(a) |
Company Stockholders Meeting
|
|
|
§6.01 |
(a) |
Company Triggering Event
|
|
|
§8.01 |
|
Competing Transaction
|
|
|
§6.04 |
(d) |
Confidentiality Agreement
|
|
|
§6.03 |
(b) |
Dissenting Shareholder
|
|
|
§2.07 |
(a) |
Dissenting Shares
|
|
|
§2.07 |
(a) |
Effective Time
|
|
|
§1.02 |
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Term |
|
Location of Definition | |
|
|
| |
Election Deadline
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(i) |
Elections
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(c) |
Environmental Permits
|
|
|
§3.15 |
|
ERISA
|
|
|
§3.10 |
(a) |
Exchange Act
|
|
|
§3.07 |
(a) |
Exchange Agent
|
|
|
§2.02 |
(a) |
Exchange Fund
|
|
|
§2.02 |
(a) |
Exchange Stock
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(a) |
Expenses
|
|
|
§8.03 |
(a) |
Fee
|
|
|
§8.03 |
(b) |
Fixed Ratio Stock
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(a) |
Floating Ratio Stock
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(a) |
Form of Election
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(c) |
Forward LLC Merger
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(l) |
GAAP
|
|
|
§3.07 |
(b) |
Governmental Authority
|
|
|
§3.05 |
(b) |
Holder Representative
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(c) |
HSR Act
|
|
|
§3.05 |
(b) |
Insurance Policies
|
|
|
§3.18 |
|
IRS
|
|
|
§3.10 |
(a) |
Law
|
|
|
§3.05 |
(a) |
Leased Real Property
|
|
|
§3.12 |
(a) |
Leases
|
|
|
§3.12 |
(a) |
Material Contracts
|
|
|
§3.17 |
(a) |
Merger
|
|
|
Recitals |
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(a) |
Merger LLC
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(l) |
Merger Sub
|
|
|
Preamble |
|
Mixed Consideration
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(c) |
Mixed Election
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(c) |
Mixed Election Share
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(d) |
Mixed Election Share
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(a) |
Multiemployer Plan
|
|
|
§3.10 |
(b) |
Multiple Employer Plan
|
|
|
§3.10 |
(b) |
Non-U.S. Benefit Plan
|
|
|
§3.10 |
(g) |
Notice of Superior Proposal
|
|
|
§6.04 |
(c) |
Nasdaq
|
|
|
§6.13 |
|
NYSE
|
|
|
§6.13 |
|
Option Consideration
|
|
|
§2.04 |
|
Option Exchange Fund
|
|
|
§2.04 |
|
Order
|
|
|
§7.01 |
(c) |
Parent
|
|
|
Preamble |
|
Parent Board
|
|
|
Recitals |
|
Parent Common Stock
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(a) |
40
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Term |
|
Location of Definition | |
|
|
| |
Parent Licensed Intellectual Property
|
|
|
§4.17 |
|
Parent Owned Intellectual Property
|
|
|
§4.17 |
|
Parent Permits
|
|
|
§4.06 |
|
Parent Preferred Stock
|
|
|
§4.03 |
(a) |
Parent Reports
|
|
|
§4.07 |
(a) |
Parent Stock Option Plans
|
|
|
§4.03 |
(a) |
Parent 2004 Balance Sheet
|
|
|
§4.07 |
(c) |
Plans
|
|
|
§3.10 |
(a) |
Potential Dissenting Shareholder
|
|
|
§2.07 |
(a) |
Potential Dissenting Shares
|
|
|
§2.07 |
(a) |
Pro Rata Amount of Cash
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(f) |
Pro Rata Number of Shares
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(e) |
Proxy Statement
|
|
|
§6.01 |
(a) |
Registration Statement
|
|
|
§6.01 |
(a) |
Representatives
|
|
|
§6.03 |
(a) |
Reverse-Subsidiary Merger
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(k) |
SEC
|
|
|
§3.07 |
(a) |
Securities Act
|
|
|
§3.07 |
(a) |
Significant Subsidiary
|
|
|
§6.04 |
(d) |
Shares
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(a) |
Stock Election
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(c) |
Stock Election Share
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(e) |
Stockholder
|
|
|
Recitals |
|
Subsidiary
|
|
|
§3.01 |
(a) |
Superior Proposal
|
|
|
§6.04 |
(e) |
Support Agreement
|
|
|
Recitals |
|
Surviving Corporation
|
|
|
§1.01 |
|
Terminating Company Breach
|
|
|
§8.01 |
(e) |
Terminating Parent Breach
|
|
|
§8.01 |
(f) |
Transactions
|
|
|
Recitals |
|
TSX
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(a) |
Unvested Options
|
|
|
§2.04 |
|
U.S. Exchange
|
|
|
§6.13 |
|
2004 Balance Sheet
|
|
|
§3.07 |
(c) |
401(k) Plan
|
|
|
§7.02 |
(i) |
US$5.50 Stock
|
|
|
§2.01 |
(a) |
Section 9.04. Severability.
If any term or other provision of this Agreement is invalid,
illegal or incapable of being enforced by any rule of law, or
public policy, all other conditions and provisions of this
Agreement shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect so
long as the economic or legal substance of the Transactions is
not affected in any manner materially adverse to any party. Upon
such determination that any term or other provision is invalid,
illegal or incapable of being enforced, the parties hereto shall
negotiate in good faith to modify this Agreement so as to effect
the original intent of the parties as closely as possible in a
mutually acceptable manner in order that the Transactions be
consummated as originally contemplated to the fullest extent
possible.
41
Section 9.05. Entire
Agreement; Assignment. This Agreement and the Support
Agreement constitute the entire agreement among the parties with
respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede, except as
set forth in Sections 6.03(b), all prior agreements and
undertakings, both written and oral, among the parties, or any
of them, with respect to the subject matter hereof. This
Agreement shall not be assigned (whether pursuant to a merger,
by operation of law or otherwise), except that Parent and Merger
Sub may assign all or any of their rights and obligations
hereunder to any affiliate of Parent, provided that no such
assignment shall relieve the assigning party of its obligations
hereunder if such assignee does not perform such obligations.
Section 9.06. Parties
in Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure
solely to the benefit of each party hereto, and nothing in this
Agreement, express or implied, is intended to or shall confer
upon any other person any right, benefit or remedy of any nature
whatsoever under or by reason of this Agreement.
Section 9.07. Specific
Performance. The parties hereto agree that irreparable
damage would occur in the event any provision of this Agreement
were not performed in accordance with the terms hereof and that
the parties shall be entitled to specific performance of the
terms hereof, in addition to any other remedy at law or equity.
Section 9.08. Governing
Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in
accordance with, the laws of the State of New York applicable to
contracts executed in and to be performed in that State (other
than those provisions set forth herein that are required to be
governed by the CCC). All actions and proceedings arising out of
or relating to this Agreement shall be heard and determined
exclusively in any New York state or federal court. The parties
hereto hereby (a) submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of
any New York state or federal court for the purpose of any
Action arising out of or relating to this Agreement brought by
any party hereto, and (b) irrevocably waive, and agree not
to assert by way of motion, defense, or otherwise, in any such
Action, any claim that it is not subject personally to the
jurisdiction of the above-named courts, that its property is
exempt or immune from attachment or execution, that the Action
is brought in an inconvenient forum, that the venue of the
Action is improper, or that this Agreement or the Transactions
may not be enforced in or by any of the above-named courts.
Section 9.09. Headings.
The descriptive headings contained in this Agreement are
included for convenience of reference only and shall not affect
in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.
Section 9.10. Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed and delivered (including by
facsimile transmission) in one or more counterparts, and by the
different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which
when executed shall be deemed to be an original but all of which
taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.
Section 9.11. Waiver
of Jury Trial. Each of the parties hereto hereby waives to
the fullest extent permitted by applicable law any right it may
have to a trial by jury with respect to any litigation directly
or indirectly arising out of, under or in connection with this
Agreement or the Transactions. Each of the parties hereto
(a) certifies that no representative, agent or attorney of
any other party has represented, expressly or otherwise, that
such other party would not, in the event of litigation, seek to
enforce that foregoing waiver and (b) acknowledges that it
and the other hereto have been induced to enter into this
Agreement and the Transactions, as applicable, by, among other
things, the mutual waivers and certifications in this
Section 9.11.
42
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Parent, Merger Sub and the Company have
caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date first
written above by their respective officers thereunto duly
authorized.
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Anthony P. Franceschini |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Anthony
P. Franceschini |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Vice President, Secretary & General Counsel |
|
|
|
STANTEC CONSULTING CALIFORNIA INC. |
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Anthony P. Franceschini |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Anthony
P. Franceschini |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Michael
J. Slocombe |
43
EXHIBIT 6.08
FORM OF AFFILIATE LETTER FOR
AFFILIATES OF THE COMPANY
April 14, 2005
Stantec Inc.
10160 112 Street
Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2L6
Canada
Ladies and Gentlemen:
I have been advised that as of the date of this letter I may be
deemed to be an affiliate of The Keith Companies,
Inc., (the Company), as the term
affiliate is defined for purposes of
paragraphs (c) and (d) of Rule 145 of the
rules and regulations (the Rules and
Regulations) of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Commission) under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the Act). Pursuant to the
terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization,
dated as of April 14, 2005 (the Merger
Agreement), among Stantec Inc., a Canadian corporation
(Parent), Stantec Consulting California Inc.
a California corporation (Merger Sub), and
the Company, the Company will be merged with and into Merger Sub
(the Merger). Capitalized terms used in this
letter agreement without definition shall have the meanings
assigned to them in the Merger Agreement.
As a result of the Merger, I may receive shares of common stock,
without par value, of Parent (the Parent
Shares). I would receive such Parent Shares in
exchange for shares (or upon exercise of options for shares)
owned by me of common stock, par value
US$ per
share, of the Company (the Company Shares).
I represent, warrant and covenant to Parent that in the event I
receive any Parent Shares as a result of the Merger:
A. I shall not make any sale, transfer or other disposition
of the Parent Shares in violation of the Act or the Rules and
Regulations.
B. I have carefully read this letter and the Merger
Agreement and discussed the requirements of such documents and
other applicable limitations upon my ability to sell, transfer
or otherwise dispose of the Parent Shares, to the extent I felt
necessary, with my counsel or counsel for the Company.
C. I have been advised that the issuance of the Parent
Shares to me pursuant to the Merger has been registered with the
Commission under the Act on a Registration Statement on
Form F-4. However, I have also been advised that, because
at the time the Merger is submitted for a vote of the
shareholders of the Company, (a) I may be deemed to be an
affiliate of the Company and (b) the distribution by me of
the Parent Shares has not been registered under the Act, I may
not sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of the Parent Shares
issued to me in the Merger unless (i) such sale, transfer
or other disposition is made in conformity with the volume and
other limitations of Rule 145 promulgated by the Commission
under the Act, (ii) such sale, transfer or other
disposition has been registered under the Act or (iii) in
the opinion of counsel reasonably acceptable to Parent, such
sale, transfer or other disposition is otherwise exempt from
registration under the Act.
D. I understand that Parent is under no obligation to
register the sale, transfer or other disposition of the Parent
Shares by me or on my behalf under the Act or, except as
provided in paragraph 2(A) below, to take any other action
necessary in order to make compliance with an exemption from
such registration available.
E. I understand that there will be placed on the
certificates for the Parent Shares issued to me, or any
substitutions therefor, a legend stating in substance:
|
|
|
THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE WERE ISSUED IN
A TRANSACTION TO WHICH RULE 145 PROMULGATED UNDER THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 APPLIES. THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY ONLY BE TRANSFERRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS
OF AN AGREEMENT DATED APRIL 14, 2005 BETWEEN THE REGISTERED
HOLDER HEREOF AND PARENT, A COPY OF WHICH AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
AT THE PRINCIPAL OFFICES OF PARENT. |
F. I understand that unless a sale or transfer is made in
conformity with the provisions of Rule 145, or pursuant to
a registration statement, Parent reserves the right to put the
following legend on the certificates issued to my transferee:
|
|
|
THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN
REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AND WERE ACQUIRED
FROM A PERSON WHO RECEIVED SUCH SHARES IN A TRANSACTION TO WHICH
RULE 145 PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
APPLIES. THE SHARES HAVE BEEN ACQUIRED BY THE HOLDER NOT WITH A
VIEW TO, OR FOR RESALE IN CONNECTION WITH, ANY DISTRIBUTION
THEREOF WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AND MAY
NOT BE SOLD, PLEDGED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED EXCEPT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH AN EXEMPTION FROM THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS
OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933. |
G. Execution of this letter should not be considered an
admission on my part that I am an affiliate of the
Company as described in the first paragraph of this letter, nor
as a waiver of any rights I may have to object to any claim that
I am such an affiliate on or after the date of this letter.
Agreed and accepted this 14th day
of April, 2005, by
STANTEC INC.
AMENDMENT AGREEMENT
AMENDMENT (this Amendment), dated as of
May 9, 2005, to the Agreement And Plan Of Merger And
Reorganization (the Agreement), dated as of
April 14, 2005, among Stantec Inc., a Canadian corporation
(Parent), Stantec Consulting California Inc.,
a California corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent
(Merger Sub), and The Keith Companies, Inc.,
a California corporation (the Company).
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the
meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement (as defined
below).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the parties have entered into the Agreement;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreement, Parent and the Company will
enter into a business combination transaction pursuant to which
the Company will merge with and into Merger Sub;
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with Section 8.04 of
the Agreement, the parties wish to amend the Agreement as set
forth in this Amendment;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the rights and obligations
contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration,
the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree
as follows:
Section 1. Amendment to
Section 2.7(a) of the Agreement. Section 2.07(a) of
the Agreement is amended and restated in its entirety to read as
follows:
(a) Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the
contrary, Shares that are outstanding immediately prior to the
Effective Time which qualify as dissenting shares in
accordance with Chapter 13 of the CCC and are held by
stockholders who have duly demanded, exercised and perfected
(and not withdrawn or forfeited) such stockholders
dissenters rights for such Shares in accordance with the
CCC (collectively, the Dissenting Shares)
shall not be converted into or represent the right to receive
the Merger Consideration. Such stockholders shall be entitled to
receive payment for such Shares held by them in accordance with
the provisions of the CCC, except that all Dissenting Shares
held by stockholders who shall have failed to perfect or take
such other actions as are required by the CCC or who effectively
shall have withdrawn or forfeited their dissenters rights
with respect to such Shares under the CCC shall thereupon be
deemed to have been converted into and to have become
exchangeable for, as of the Effective Time, the right to receive
the Merger Consideration, without any interest thereon, upon
surrender, in the manner provided in Section 2.02, of the
certificates that formerly evidenced such Shares.
Section 2. Entire
Agreement. This Amendment constitutes the entire agreement
of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof
and supersedes all prior agreements and undertakings, both
written and oral, among the parties with respect to the subject
matter hereof. Except as amended by this Amendment, the
Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
Section 3. Severability.
If any term or other provision of this Amendment is invalid,
illegal or incapable of being enforced by any Law or public
policy, all other terms and provisions of this Amendment shall
nevertheless remain in full force and effect so long as the
economic or legal substance of the transactions contemplated by
this Amendment is not affected in any manner materially adverse
to any party. Upon such determination that any term or other
provision is invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced,
the parties hereto shall negotiate in good faith to modify this
Amendment so as to effect the original intent of the parties as
closely as possible in an acceptable manner in order that the
transactions contemplated by this Amendment are consummated as
originally contemplated to the greatest extent possible.
Section 4. Counterparts.
This Amendment may be executed and delivered (including by
facsimile transmission) in one or more counterparts, and by the
different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which
when executed shall be deemed to be an original but all of which
taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.
Section 5. Governing
Law. This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in
accordance with, the laws of the State of New York applicable to
contracts executed in and to be performed in that State (other
than those provisions set forth herein that are required to be
governed by the CCC).
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Parent, Merger Sub and the Company have
caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date first
written above by their respective officers thereunto duly
authorized.
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Anthony P. Franceschini |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Anthony P. Franceschini |
|
Title: President & CEO |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Jeffrey S. Lloyd |
|
Title: Secretary, Vice President & General
Counsel |
|
|
|
STANTEC CONSULTING CALIFORNIA INC. |
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Anthony P. Franceschini |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Anthony P. Franceschini |
|
Title: President |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Michael Slocombe |
|
Title: Secretary |
|
|
|
THE KEITH COMPANIES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Aram H. Keith |
|
Title: Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Gary Campanaro |
|
Title: Secretary |
Summary of Contents of
Company Disclosure Schedule to
Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization*
Section 3.01. Organization
and Qualification; Subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
|
List of the Companys Subsidiaries. |
Section 3.05. No Conflict;
Required Filings and Consents.
|
|
|
|
|
Description of the Companys Credit Agreement with Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association. |
Section 3.09. Absence of
Litigation.
|
|
|
|
|
Description of current litigation. |
Section 3.10. Employee
Benefit Plans.
|
|
|
|
|
List of the Companys medical plans, dental plans,
disability plans and other employee benefit plans and related
employment and benefit matters. |
|
|
|
List of all agreements with the Companys officers. |
|
|
|
Description of the Companys general severance policy. |
|
|
|
List of the Companys agreements with employees, including
collective bargaining agreements, severance agreements, and
restricted stock purchase agreements. |
Section 3.11. Labor and
Employment Matters.
|
|
|
|
|
Description of ongoing labor negotiations. |
|
|
|
List of agreements between the Company and unions. |
|
|
|
Description of labor claims. |
|
|
|
Description of resolved and pending regulatory claims. |
Section 3.12. Real
Property; Title to Assets.
|
|
|
|
|
List of all real property leased by the Company. |
Section 3.14. Taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
Description of current tax accruals on the Companys
financial statements and other tax matters. |
Section 3.15. Environmental
Matters.
|
|
|
|
|
Description of potential environmental issues associated with
office space the Company was in negotiations to rent. |
Section 3.17. Material
Contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
List of the Companys (i) credit agreement with Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, (ii) stock incentive
plans, (iii) restricted stock agreements and severance
agreements and related benefit and labor agreements and
(iv) indemnification agreements with directors. |
|
|
* |
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K, the
Registrant hereby agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of the
Company Disclosure Schedule to Agreement and Plan of Merger and
Reorganization to the Commission upon request. |
|
|
|
|
|
Description of subconsulting agreements entered into between the
Company and subconsultants in the ordinary course of business. |
Section 3.18. Insurance.
|
|
|
|
|
Statement regarding copies of insurance policies made available
to Parent. |
Section 3.20. Customers and
Suppliers.
|
|
|
|
|
List of the Companys top ten customers. |
Appendix B
OPINION OF BEAR, STEARNS & CO. INC.
B-1
April 14, 2005
The Board of Directors
The Keith Companies, Inc.
19 Technology Drive Irvine, CA 92618
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We understand that The Keith Companies, Inc. (the
Company), Stantec Inc. (Stantec)
and Stantec Consulting California Inc., a wholly owned
subsidiary of Stantec (Merger Sub), propose to enter
into an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization to be
dated April 14, 2005 (the Merger Agreement),
pursuant to which the Company will merge into Merger Sub (the
Merger) and each share of the Companys common
stock, par value $0.001 per share (the Company Common
Stock), other than each share of Company Common Stock held
in the treasury of the Company, each share of Company Common
Stock owned by Stantec, Merger Sub, or any direct or indirect
wholly owned subsidiaries of Stantec or the Company, and any
dissenting shares will be converted into the right to receive
(i) $11.00 in cash, (ii) 0.23 shares of Stantecs
common stock, without par value (the Stantec Common
Stock), and (iii) an additional number of shares of
Stantec Common Stock equal to $5.50 in value, based on the
simple average of the US dollar value of the daily weighted
average sales price of Stantec Common Stock for the
20 consecutive trading days ending on (and including) the
second trading day prior to the consummation of the Merger
(collectively, the Merger Consideration). The
shareholders of the Company will further be able to make an
election to receive the Merger Consideration in either cash or
shares of Stantec Common Stock, subject to proration, as more
fully described in the Merger Agreement. You have provided us
with a copy of the Merger Agreement in substantially final form.
You have asked us to render our opinion as to whether the Merger
Consideration is fair, from a financial point of view, to the
shareholders of the Company.
In the course of performing our review and analyses for
rendering this opinion, we have:
|
|
|
|
§ |
reviewed the Merger Agreement; |
|
|
§ |
reviewed the Companys Annual Reports to Shareholders and
Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, its preliminary results
for the quarter ended March, 31, 2005 and its Current Reports on
Form 8-K for the three years ended the date hereof; |
|
|
§ |
reviewed Stantecs Proxy Circular, Annual Information Form
and Annual Reports to Shareholders for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and its interim financial
reports for the three years ended the date hereof; |
|
|
§ |
reviewed certain operating and financial information relating to
the Companys business and prospects, including an
operating budget for the year ended December 31, 2005, as
prepared and provided to us by the Companys management; |
Form of Fairness Opinion Letter
The Board of Directors
The Keith Companies, Inc.
April 14, 2005
Page 2
|
|
|
|
§ |
met with certain members of the Companys senior management
to discuss the Companys business, operations, historical
financial results, a range of projected financial results and
future prospects; |
|
|
§ |
reviewed certain operating and financial information relating to
Stantecs business and prospects, as prepared and provided
to us by Stantecs management; |
|
|
§ |
reviewed certain projections for Stantec for the year ended
December 31, 2005, published by certain equity research
analysts, selected by us following discussions with
Stantecs senior management; |
|
|
§ |
met with certain members of senior management of Stantec and the
Company to discuss Stantecs business, operations,
historical and projected financial results and future prospects; |
|
|
§ |
reviewed the historical prices, trading multiples and trading
volumes of the shares of Company Common Stock and Stantec Common
Stock; |
|
|
§ |
reviewed publicly available financial data, stock market
performance data and trading multiples of companies which we
deemed generally comparable to the Company and Stantec; |
|
|
§ |
reviewed the terms of recent mergers and acquisitions of
companies which we deemed generally comparable to the Company; |
|
|
§ |
performed discounted cash flow sensitivity analyses based on the
ranges of projected financial results for the Company furnished
to us by the Companys senior management; |
|
|
§ |
reviewed the pro forma financial results, financial condition
and capitalization of Stantec giving effect to the Merger; and |
|
|
§ |
conducted such other studies, analyses, inquiries and
investigations as we deemed appropriate. |
We have relied upon and assumed, without independent
verification, the accuracy and completeness of the financial and
other information provided to us by the Company and Stantec,
including, without limitation, the range of projected financial
results furnished to us by the Companys senior management.
With respect to the Companys range of projected financial
results, we have relied on representations that they have been
reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently
available estimates and judgments of the senior management of
the Company as to the expected future performance of the
Company. We have not assumed any responsibility for the
independent verification of any such information provided to us,
or of the range of projected financial results provided to
discussed with us, and we have further relied upon the
assurances of the senior management of the Company and Stantec
that they are unaware of any facts that would make the
information provided to us or range of projected financial
results furnished to us incomplete or misleading.
In arriving at our opinion, we have not performed or obtained
any independent appraisal of the assets or liabilities
(contingent or otherwise) of the Company or Stantec, nor have we
been furnished with any such appraisals. We have not solicited,
nor were we asked to solicit, third party acquisition interest
in the Company. We have assumed that the Merger will qualify as
a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. We have
further assumed that the Merger will be consummated in a timely
manner and in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement
without
Form of Fairness Opinion Letter
2
The Board of Directors
The Keith Companies, Inc.
April 14, 2005
Page 3
any limitations, restrictions, conditions, amendments or
modifications, regulatory or otherwise, that collectively would
have a material effect on the Company or Stantec.
We do not express any opinion as to the price or range of prices
at which the shares of Company Common Stock or shares of Stantec
Common Stock may trade subsequent to the announcement of the
Merger or as to the price or range of prices at which the shares
of Stantec Common Stock may trade subsequent to the consummation
of the Merger.
We have acted as a financial advisor to the Company in
connection with the Merger and will receive a customary fee for
such services, a substantial portion of which is contingent on
successful consummation of the Merger. In the ordinary course of
business, Bear Stearns and its affiliates may actively trade the
equity and debt securities and/or bank debt of the Company
and/or Stantec for our own account and for the account of our
customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short
position in such securities or bank debt.
It is understood that this letter is intended for the benefit
and use of the Board of Directors of the Company and does not
constitute a recommendation to the Board of Directors of the
Company or any holders of Company Common Stock as to how to vote
in connection with the Merger. This opinion does not address the
Companys underlying business decision to pursue the
Merger, the relative merits of the Merger as compared to any
alternative transactions or business strategies that might exist
for the Company, the financing of the Merger or the effects of
any other transaction in which the Company might engage. This
letter is not to be used for any other purpose, or be
reproduced, disseminated, quoted from or referred to at any
time, in whole or in part, without our prior written consent;
provided, however, that this letter may be included in its
entirety in any proxy statement/prospectus to be distributed to
the holders of Company Common Stock in connection with the
Merger. Our opinion is subject to the assumptions and conditions
contained herein and is necessarily based on economic, market
and other conditions, and the information made available to us,
as of the date hereof. We assume no responsibility for updating
or revising our opinion based on circumstances or events
occurring after the date hereof.
Based on and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that,
as of the date hereof, the Merger Consideration is fair, from a
financial point of view, to the shareholders of the Company.
|
|
Very truly yours, |
|
|
Bear, Stearns &
Co. Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Neil B. Morganbesser |
|
Form of Fairness Opinion Letter
3
Appendix C
STOCKHOLDERS SUPPORT AGREEMENT
C-1
STOCKHOLDERS SUPPORT AGREEMENT
STOCKHOLDERS AGREEMENT, dated as of April 14, 2005 (this
Agreement), among Stantec Inc., a Canadian
corporation (Parent), Stantec Consulting
California Inc., a California corporation and a wholly owned
subsidiary of Parent (Purchaser), and each of
the stockholders whose names appear on Exhibit A to this
Agreement (each, a Stockholder and,
collectively, the Stockholders).
WHEREAS, as of the date hereof and except as noted on
Exhibit A hereto, each Stockholder represents and warrants
to Parent that he, she or it owns of record and/or beneficially
and has good, valid and marketable title to, free and clear of
any Lien, proxy, voting restriction, limitation on disposition,
adverse claim of ownership or use or encumbrance of any kind,
other than pursuant to this Agreement, a margin account
established in accordance with Regulation T under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the trust agreement
establishing the Aram H. Keith and Margie R. Keith
Revocable Trust dated October 23, 1989 (the
Trust), and the Trust has the sole power to
vote the number of shares of common stock, par value
$0.001 per share (Company Common Stock), of The
Keith Companies, Inc., a California corporation (the
Company), as set forth opposite such
Stockholders name on Exhibit A hereto (all such
shares of Company Common Stock and any shares of Company Common
Stock of which ownership of record or the power to vote is
hereafter acquired by the Stockholders prior to the termination
of this Agreement being referred to herein as the
Shares); and
WHEREAS, Parent, Purchaser and the Company propose to enter
into, simultaneously herewith, an Agreement and Plan of Merger
and Reorganization (the Merger Agreement; terms used
but not defined in this Agreement shall have the meanings
ascribed to them in the Merger Agreement), a draft of which has
been made available to each Stockholder, which provides, upon
the terms and subject to the conditions thereof, for the merger
of Purchaser with and into the Company (the Merger);
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the
mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and in the
Merger Agreement, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the
Stockholders hereby agree as follows:
|
|
|
|
1. |
Representations and Warranties of the Stockholders. Each
Stockholder hereby, jointly and severally, represents and
warrants to Parent and Purchaser as follows: |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
The Trust is a trust duly organized, validly existing and in
good standing under the laws of the State of California. The
Trust has all necessary power and authority to execute and
deliver this Agreement and to perform its obligations hereunder.
The execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Trust and
the performance by the Trust of its obligations hereunder have
been duly and validly authorized by all necessary action, and no
other proceedings on the part of the Trust are necessary to
authorize this Agreement or to perform its obligations
hereunder. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered
by the Trust and, assuming the due authorization, execution and
delivery by Parent and Purchaser, constitutes the legal, valid
and binding obligation of the Trust, enforceable against the
Trust in accordance with its terms, except as such
enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy
insolvency and similar laws affecting creditors rights
generally and general principles of equity (whether considered
in a proceeding at law or equity). |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
The execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Trust do
not, and the performance of this Agreement by the Trust will
not, (A) conflict with or violate the organizational
documents of the Trust, (B) assuming that all consents,
approvals, authorizations and other actions described in
subsection (c) have been obtained and all filings and
obligations described in subsection (c) have been made,
conflict with or violate any Law applicable to the Trust or by
which any property or asset of the Trust is bound or affected,
or (C) result in any breach of or constitute a default (or
an event which, with notice or lapse of time or both, would
become a default) under, or give to others any right of
termination, amendment, acceleration or cancellation of, or
result in the creation of a Lien or other encumbrance on |
|
|
|
|
|
any property or asset of the Trust pursuant to, any note, bond,
mortgage, indenture, contract, agreement, lease, license,
permit, franchise or other instrument or obligation. |
|
|
(c) |
The execution and delivery of this Agreement by each Stockholder
does not, and the performance of this Agreement by each
Stockholder will not, require any consent, approval,
authorization or permit of, or filing with or notification to,
any Governmental Authority, except for applicable requirements,
if any, of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Exchange
Act and the HSR Act. |
|
|
(d) |
With respect to Aram H. Keith and Margie R. Keith (each an
Individual), this Agreement has been duly
executed and delivered by each Individual and, assuming the due
authorization, execution and delivery by Parent and Purchaser,
constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of each
Individual, enforceable against each Individual in accordance
with its terms, except as such enforceability may be limited by
applicable bankruptcy insolvency and similar laws affecting
creditors rights generally and general principles of
equity (whether considered in a proceeding at law or equity). |
|
|
(e) |
Except for shares of Company Common Stock held directly by the
Trust, the Individuals do not own, either directly or
beneficially, any shares of Company Common Stock. |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Grant of Proxy. Each Stockholder, by this Agreement, with
respect to his, her or its Shares, hereby agrees, and to secure
such agreement, grants an irrevocable proxy to Parent (and
agrees to execute such documents or certificates evidencing such
proxy as Parent may reasonably request) to vote, at any meeting
of the stockholders of the Company, and in any action by written
consent of the stockholders of the Company, all of such
Stockholders Shares (i) in favor of the approval and
adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger,
(ii) against any action, agreement or transaction (other
than the Merger Agreement or the Merger) or proposal (including
any Superior Proposal) that would result in a breach of any
covenant, representation or warranty or any other obligation or
agreement of the Company under the Merger Agreement or that
could result in any of the conditions to the Companys
obligations under the Merger Agreement not being fulfilled, and
(iii) in favor of any other matter necessary to the
consummation of the Merger and considered and voted upon by the
stockholders of the Company. Each Stockholder further agrees to
cause such Stockholders Shares to be voted in accordance
with the foregoing. THIS PROXY IS IRREVOCABLE AND SECURES THE
PERFORMANCE BY THE STOCKHOLDERS OF THE DUTIES SET FORTH HEREIN.
Each Stockholder acknowledges receipt and review of a copy of
the Merger Agreement. |
|
|
3. |
Transfer of Shares. Each Stockholder agrees that he, she
or it shall not, directly or indirectly, (a) sell, assign,
transfer (including by operation of law), lien, pledge, dispose
of or otherwise encumber any of the Shares or otherwise agree to
do any of the foregoing, (b) deposit any Shares into a
voting trust or enter into a voting agreement or arrangement or
grant any proxy or power of attorney with respect thereto that
is inconsistent with this Agreement, (c) enter into any
contract, option or other arrangement or undertaking with
respect to the direct or indirect acquisition or sale,
assignment, transfer (including by operation of law) or other
disposition of any Shares or (d) take any action that would
make any representation or warranty of such Stockholder herein
untrue or incorrect in any material respect or have the effect
of preventing or disabling the Stockholder from performing his,
her or its obligations hereunder. |
|
|
4. |
No Solicitation of Transactions. None of the Stockholders
shall, directly or indirectly, (a) solicit, initiate or
encourage the submission of, any Competing Transaction or
(b) participate in any discussions or negotiations
regarding, or furnish to any person, any information with
respect to, or otherwise cooperate in any way with respect to,
or assist or participate in, facilitate or encourage, any
unsolicited proposal that constitutes, or may reasonably be
expected to lead to, a Superior Proposal; provided, however,
that nothing in this Section 3 shall prevent Aram H.
Keith, in his capacity as a director and executive officer of
the Company from, engaging in any activity permitted pursuant to
Section 6.04 of the Merger Agreement. Each Stockholder
shall, and shall |
2
|
|
|
|
|
direct his, her or its representatives and agents to,
immediately cease and terminate any discussions or negotiations
with any parties that may be ongoing with respect to any
Competing Transaction. |
|
|
5. |
Information for Proxy Statement/ Prospectus; Disclosure.
Each Stockholder authorizes and agrees to permit Parent and
Purchaser to publish and disclose in the Proxy Statement/
Prospectus and related filings under the securities laws such
Stockholders identity and ownership of Shares and the
nature of his, her or its commitments, arrangements and
understandings under this Agreement and any other information
required by applicable Law. |
|
|
6. |
Termination. The obligations of the Stockholders under
this Agreement shall terminate upon the earlier of (i) the
Effective Time and (ii) upon the termination of the Merger
Agreement. Nothing in this Section 7 shall relieve any
party of liability for any breach of this Agreement occurring
prior to the time of such termination. |
|
|
7. |
Miscellaneous. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary
contained herein, no action of a Stockholder in his, her or its
capacity as a director or executive officer of the Company shall
constitute a breach of this Agreement. Except as otherwise
provided herein, all costs and expenses incurred in connection
with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby
shall be paid by the party incurring such costs and expenses,
whether or not the transactions contemplated hereby are
consummated; all notices, requests, claims, demands and other
communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given
(and shall be deemed to have been duly given upon receipt) by
delivery in person, by telecopy, e-mail or by registered or
certified mail (postage prepaid, return receipt requested) to
the respective parties at their addresses as specified on the
signature page(s) of this Agreement; if any term or other
provision of this Agreement is invalid, illegal or incapable of
being enforced by any rule of law or public policy, all other
conditions and provisions of this Agreement shall nevertheless
remain in full force and effect so long as the economic or legal
substance of the transactions contemplated hereby is not
affected in any manner materially adverse to any party; this
Agreement and the Merger Agreement constitute the entire
agreement among the parties with respect to the subject matter
hereof and supersede all prior agreements and undertakings, both
written and oral, among the parties, or any of them, with
respect to the subject matter hereof; this Agreement shall not
be assigned (whether pursuant to a merger, by operation of law
or otherwise), except that Parent may assign all or any of its
rights and obligations hereunder to any affiliate of Parent,
provided, however, that no such assignment shall
relieve the assigning party of its obligations hereunder if such
assignee does not perform such obligations; this Agreement shall
be binding upon and inure solely to the benefit of each party
hereto, and nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is
intended to or shall confer upon any other person any right,
benefit or remedy of any nature whatsoever under or by reason of
this Agreement; the parties hereto agree that irreparable damage
would occur in the event any provision of this Agreement was not
performed in accordance with the terms hereof and that the
parties shall be entitled to specific performance of the terms
hereof, in addition to any other remedy at law or in equity;
this Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance
with, the laws of the State of California applicable to
contracts executed in and to be performed in that State; this
Agreement may be executed and delivered (including by facsimile
transmission) in one or more counterparts, and by the different
parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when
executed shall be deemed to be an original but all of which
taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement; from
time to time, at the request of Parent, in the case of any
Stockholder, or at the request of the Stockholders, in the case
of Parent and Purchaser, and without further consideration, each
party shall execute and deliver or cause to be executed and
delivered such additional documents and instruments and take all
such further action as may be reasonably necessary or desirable
to give effect to the rights, duties and obligations of the
parties set forth in this Agreement; each of the parties
hereto hereby waives to the fullest extent permitted by
applicable law any right it may have to a trial by jury with
respect to any litigation directly or indirectly arising out of,
under or in connection with this agreement. |
3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as
of the date first written above.
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Anthony P.
Franceschini
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Anthony P. Franceschini |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Vice President, Secretary & General Counsel |
|
|
|
Stantec Consulting
California Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Anthony P.
Franceschini
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Anthony P. Franceschini |
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Michael J.
Slocombe
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Michael J. Slocombe |
|
|
|
Aram H. Keith and
Margie R. Keith Revocable Trust
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aram H. Keith, as Trustee |
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Margie R.
Keith Trustee
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margie R. Keith, as Trustee |
|
|
/s/ Aram H. Keith
|
|
|
|
Aram H. Keith |
|
|
/s/ Margie R. Keith
|
|
|
|
Margie R. Keith |
4
EXHIBIT A
LIST OF STOCKHOLDERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares of Company | |
|
|
Common Stock Owned | |
Name of Stockholder |
|
Beneficially | |
|
|
| |
ARAM H. KEITH AND MARGIE R. KEITH REVOCABLE TRUST DATED
OCTOBER 23, 1989 |
|
|
1,366,217 |
|
ARAM H. KEITH
|
|
|
1,366,217 |
|
MARGIE R. KEITH
|
|
|
1,366,217 |
|
5
Appendix D
DISSENTERS RIGHTS AND PROCEDURES
D-1
CALIFORNIA CORPORATIONS CODE
SECTION 1300-1313
DISSENTERS RIGHTS
1300. (a) If the approval of the outstanding shares
(Section 152) of a corporation is required for a
reorganization under subdivisions (a) and (b) or
subdivision (e) or (f) of Section 1201, each
shareholder of the corporation entitled to vote on the
transaction and each shareholder of a subsidiary corporation in
a short-form merger may, by complying with this chapter, require
the corporation in which the shareholder holds shares to
purchase for cash at their fair market value the shares owned by
the shareholder which are dissenting shares as defined in
subdivision (b). The fair market value shall be determined as of
the day before the first announcement of the terms of the
proposed reorganization or short-form merger, excluding any
appreciation or depreciation in consequence of the proposed
action, but adjusted for any stock split, reverse stock split,
or share dividend which becomes effective thereafter.
(b) As used in this chapter, dissenting shares
means shares which come within all of the following descriptions:
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Which were not immediately prior to the reorganization or
short-form merger either (A) listed on any national
securities exchange certified by the Commissioner of
Corporations under subdivision (o) of Section 25100 or
(B) listed on the National Market System of the NASDAQ Stock
Market, and the notice of meeting of shareholders to act upon
the reorganization summarizes this section and
Sections 1301, 1302, 1303 and 1304; provided, however, that
this provision does not apply to any shares with respect to
which there exists any restriction on transfer imposed by the
corporation or by any law or regulation; and provided, further,
that this provision does not apply to any class of shares
described in subparagraph (A) or (B) if demands for
payment are filed with respect to 5 percent or more of the
outstanding shares of that class. |
|
|
(2) |
Which were outstanding on the date for the determination of
shareholders entitled to vote on the reorganization and
(A) were not voted in favor of the reorganization or,
(B) if described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of
paragraph (1) (without regard to the provisos in that
paragraph), were voted against the reorganization, or which were
held of record on the effective date of a short-form merger;
provided, however, that subparagraph (A) rather than
subparagraph (B) of this paragraph applies in any case
where the approval required by Section 1201 is sought by
written consent rather than at a meeting. |
|
|
(3) |
Which the dissenting shareholder has demanded that the
corporation purchase at their fair market value, in accordance
with Section 1301. |
|
|
(4) |
Which the dissenting shareholder has submitted for endorsement,
in accordance with Section 1302. |
(c) As used in this chapter, dissenting
shareholder means the recordholder of dissenting shares
and includes a transferee of record.
1301. (a) If, in the case of a reorganization, any
shareholders of a corporation have a right under
Section 1300, subject to compliance with paragraphs
(3) and (4) of subdivision (b) thereof, to
require the corporation to purchase their shares for cash, such
corporation shall mail to each such shareholder a notice of the
approval of the reorganization by its outstanding shares
(Section 152) within 10 days after the date of such
approval, accompanied by a copy of Sections 1300, 1302,
1303, 1304 and this section, a statement of the price determined
by the corporation to represent the fair market value of the
dissenting shares, and a brief description of the procedure to
be followed if the shareholder desires to exercise the
shareholders right under such sections. The statement of
price constitutes an offer by the corporation to purchase at the
price stated any dissenting shares as defined in subdivision
(b) of Section 1300, unless they lose their status as
dissenting shares under Section 1309.
(b) Any shareholder who has a right to require the
corporation to purchase the shareholders shares for cash
under Section 1300, subject to compliance with paragraphs
(3) and (4) of subdivision (b) thereof, and who
desires the corporation to purchase such shares shall make
written demand upon the corporation for the
purchase of such shares and payment to the shareholder in cash
of their fair market value. The demand is not effective for any
purpose unless it is received by the corporation or any transfer
agent thereof (1) in the case of shares described in clause
(i) or (ii) of paragraph (1) of subdivision
(b) of Section 1300 (without regard to the provisos in
that paragraph), not later than the date of the
shareholders meeting to vote upon the reorganization, or
(2) in any other case within 30 days after the date on
which the notice of the approval by the outstanding shares
pursuant to subdivision (a) or the notice pursuant to
subdivision (i) of Section 1110 was mailed to the
shareholder.
(c) The demand shall state the number and class of the
shares held of record by the shareholder which the shareholder
demands that the corporation purchase and shall contain a
statement of what such shareholder claims to be the fair market
value of those shares as of the day before the announcement of
the proposed reorganization or short-form merger. The statement
of fair market value constitutes an offer by the shareholder to
sell the shares at such price.
1302. Within 30 days after the date on which notice of the
approval by the outstanding shares or the notice pursuant to
subdivision (i) of Section 1110 was mailed to the
shareholder, the shareholder shall submit to the corporation at
its principal office or at the office of any transfer agent
thereof, (a) if the shares are certificated securities, the
shareholders certificates representing any shares which
the shareholder demands that the corporation purchase, to be
stamped or endorsed with a statement that the shares are
dissenting shares or to be exchanged for certificates of
appropriate denomination so stamped or endorsed or (b) if
the shares are uncertificated securities, written notice of the
number of shares which the shareholder demands that the
corporation purchase. Upon subsequent transfers of the
dissenting shares on the books of the corporation, the new
certificates, initial transaction statement, and other written
statements issued therefor shall bear a like statement, together
with the name of the original dissenting holder of the shares.
1303. (a) If the corporation and the shareholder agree that
the shares are dissenting shares and agree upon the price of the
shares, the dissenting shareholder is entitled to the agreed
price with interest thereon at the legal rate on judgments from
the date of the agreement. Any agreements fixing the fair market
value of any dissenting shares as between the corporation and
the holders thereof shall be filed with the secretary of the
corporation.
(b) Subject to the provisions of Section 1306, payment
of the fair market value of dissenting shares shall be made
within 30 days after the amount thereof has been agreed or
within 30 days after any statutory or contractual
conditions to the reorganization are satisfied, whichever is
later, and in the case of certificated securities, subject to
surrender of the certificates therefor, unless provided
otherwise by agreement.
1304. (a) If the corporation denies that the shares are
dissenting shares, or the corporation and the shareholder fail
to agree upon the fair market value of the shares, then the
shareholder demanding purchase of such shares as dissenting
shares or any interested corporation, within six months after
the date on which notice of the approval by the outstanding
shares (Section 152) or notice pursuant to subdivision
(i) of Section 1110 was mailed to the shareholder, but
not thereafter, may file a complaint in the superior court of
the proper county praying the court to determine whether the
shares are dissenting shares or the fair market value of the
dissenting shares or both or may intervene in any action pending
on such a complaint.
(b) Two or more dissenting shareholders may join as
plaintiffs or be joined as defendants in any such action and two
or more such actions may be consolidated.
(c) On the trial of the action, the court shall determine
the issues. If the status of the shares as dissenting shares is
in issue, the court shall first determine that issue. If the
fair market value of the dissenting shares is in issue, the
court shall determine, or shall appoint one or more impartial
appraisers to determine, the fair market value of the shares.
1305. (a) If the court appoints an appraiser or appraisers,
they shall proceed forthwith to determine the fair market value
per share.
Within the time fixed by the court, the appraisers, or a
majority of them, shall make and file a report in the office of
the clerk of the court. Thereupon, on the motion of any party,
the report shall be submitted to
2
the court and considered on such evidence as the court considers
relevant. If the court finds the report reasonable, the court
may confirm it.
(b) If a majority of the appraisers appointed fail to make
and file a report within 10 days from the date of their
appointment or within such further time as may be allowed by the
court or the report is not confirmed by the court, the court
shall determine the fair market value of the dissenting shares.
(c) Subject to the provisions of Section 1306,
judgment shall be rendered against the corporation for payment
of an amount equal to the fair market value of each dissenting
share multiplied by the number of dissenting shares which any
dissenting shareholder who is a party, or who has intervened, is
entitled to require the corporation to purchase, with interest
thereon at the legal rate from the date on which judgment was
entered.
(d) Any such judgment shall be payable forthwith with
respect to uncertificated securities and, with respect to
certificated securities, only upon the endorsement and delivery
to the corporation of the certificates for the shares described
in the judgment. Any party may appeal from the judgment.
(e) The costs of the action, including reasonable
compensation to the appraisers to be fixed by the court, shall
be assessed or apportioned as the court considers equitable,
but, if the appraisal exceeds the price offered by the
corporation, the corporation shall pay the costs (including in
the discretion of the court attorneys fees, fees of expert
witnesses and interest at the legal rate on judgments from the
date of compliance with Sections 1300, 1301 and 1302 if the
value awarded by the court for the shares is more than 125
percent of the price offered by the corporation under
subdivision (a) of Section 1301).
1306. To the extent that the provisions of Chapter 5
prevent the payment to any holders of dissenting shares of their
fair market value, they shall become creditors of the
corporation for the amount thereof together with interest at the
legal rate on judgments until the date of payment, but
subordinate to all other creditors in any liquidation
proceeding, such debt to be payable when permissible under the
provisions of Chapter 5.
1307. Cash dividends declared and paid by the corporation upon
the dissenting shares after the date of approval of the
reorganization by the outstanding shares (Section 152) and
prior to payment for the shares by the corporation shall be
credited against the total amount to be paid by the corporation
therefor.
1308. Except as expressly limited in this chapter, holders of
dissenting shares continue to have all the rights and privileges
incident to their shares, until the fair market value of their
shares is agreed upon or determined. A dissenting shareholder
may not withdraw a demand for payment unless the corporation
consents thereto.
1309. Dissenting shares lose their status as dissenting shares
and the holders thereof cease to be dissenting shareholders and
cease to be entitled to require the corporation to purchase
their shares upon the happening of any of the following:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
The corporation abandons the reorganization. Upon abandonment of
the reorganization, the corporation shall pay on demand to any
dissenting shareholder who has initiated proceedings in good
faith under this chapter all necessary expenses incurred in such
proceedings and reasonable attorneys fees. |
|
|
(b) |
The shares are transferred prior to their submission for
endorsement in accordance with Section 1302 or are
surrendered for conversion into shares of another class in
accordance with the articles. |
|
|
(c) |
The dissenting shareholder and the corporation do not agree upon
the status of the shares as dissenting shares or upon the
purchase price of the shares, and neither files a complaint or
intervenes in a pending action as provided in Section 1304,
within six months after the date on which notice of the approval
by the outstanding shares or notice pursuant to subdivision
(i) of Section 1110 was mailed to the shareholder. |
3
|
|
|
|
(d) |
The dissenting shareholder, with the consent of the corporation,
withdraws the shareholders demand for purchase of the
dissenting shares. |
1310. If litigation is instituted to test the sufficiency or
regularity of the votes of the shareholders in authorizing a
reorganization, any proceedings under Sections 1304 and
1305 shall be suspended until final determination of such
litigation.
1311. This chapter, except Section 1312, does not apply to
classes of shares whose terms and provisions specifically set
forth the amount to be paid in respect to such shares in the
event of a reorganization or merger.
1312. (a) No shareholder of a corporation who has a right
under this chapter to demand payment of cash for the shares held
by the shareholder shall have any right at law or in equity to
attack the validity of the reorganization or short-form merger,
or to have the reorganization or short-form merger set aside or
rescinded, except in an action to test whether the number of
shares required to authorize or approve the reorganization have
been legally voted in favor thereof; but any holder of shares of
a class whose terms and provisions specifically set forth the
amount to be paid in respect to them in the event of a
reorganization or short-form merger is entitled to payment in
accordance with those terms and provisions or, if the principal
terms of the reorganization are approved pursuant to subdivision
(b) of Section 1202, is entitled to payment in
accordance with the terms and provisions of the approved
reorganization.
(b) If one of the parties to a reorganization or short-form
merger is directly or indirectly controlled by, or under common
control with, another party to the reorganization or short-form
merger, subdivision (a) shall not apply to any shareholder
of such party who has not demanded payment of cash for such
shareholders shares pursuant to this chapter; but if the
shareholder institutes any action to attack the validity of the
reorganization or short-form merger or to have the
reorganization or short-form merger set aside or rescinded, the
shareholder shall not thereafter have any right to demand
payment of cash for the shareholders shares pursuant to
this chapter. The court in any action attacking the validity of
the reorganization or short-form merger or to have the
reorganization or short-form merger set aside or rescinded shall
not restrain or enjoin the consummation of the transaction
except upon 10 days prior notice to the corporation
and upon a determination by the court that clearly no other
remedy will adequately protect the complaining shareholder or
the class of shareholders of which such shareholder is a member.
(c) If one of the parties to a reorganization or short-form
merger is directly or indirectly controlled by, or under common
control with, another party to the reorganization or short-form
merger, in any action to attack the validity of the
reorganization or short-form merger or to have the
reorganization or short-form merger set aside or rescinded,
(1) a party to a reorganization or short-form merger which
controls another party to the reorganization or short-form
merger shall have the burden of proving that the transaction is
just and reasonable as to the shareholders of the controlled
party, and (2) a person who controls two or more parties to
a reorganization shall have the burden of proving that the
transaction is just and reasonable as to the shareholders of any
party so controlled.
1313. A conversion pursuant to Chapter 11.5 (commencing
with Section 1150) shall be deemed to constitute a
reorganization for purposes of applying the provisions of this
chapter, in accordance with and to the extent provided in
Section 1159.
4
Who Can Help Answer Your Questions
If you have more questions about the merger or if you would like
copies of any documents incorporated by reference into this
proxy statement/prospectus, which include important business and
financial information about Keith that is not included in or
delivered with this document, you may write or call the
following persons:
The Keith Companies, Inc.
19 Technology Drive
Irvine, California, USA 92618-2334
Phone: (949) 923-6001 Fax: (949) 923-6026
Attention: Investor Relations
or
The Altman Group, Inc.
1275 Valley Brook Avenue
Lyndhurst, NJ 07071
Phone: (201) 806-2205
Attention: Charlotte Brown
Upon request, we will provide the documents you ask for at no
cost to you. To ensure timely delivery prior to the Keith
special meeting, any request for documents should be received by
September 6, 2005. Please note that copies of these
documents will not include exhibits to the documents, unless the
exhibits are specifically incorporated by reference into the
documents or this proxy statement/ prospectus.