e10vq
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File No. 000-26719
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Michigan
|
|
38-3360865 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
310 Leonard Street, NW, Grand Rapids, MI 49504
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(616) 406-3000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer þ |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
At May 9, 2008, there were 8,528,902 shares of Common Stock outstanding.
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
INDEX
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
31,903,000 |
|
|
$ |
29,138,000 |
|
Short term investments |
|
|
537,000 |
|
|
|
292,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
32,440,000 |
|
|
|
29,430,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
133,978,000 |
|
|
|
136,673,000 |
|
Securities held to maturity (fair value of $66,461,000 at
March 31, 2008 and $66,440,000 at December 31, 2007) |
|
|
65,318,000 |
|
|
|
65,330,000 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
12,230,000 |
|
|
|
9,733,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases |
|
|
1,794,310,000 |
|
|
|
1,799,880,000 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(29,957,000 |
) |
|
|
(25,814,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases, net |
|
|
1,764,353,000 |
|
|
|
1,774,066,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
34,178,000 |
|
|
|
34,351,000 |
|
Bank owned life insurance policies |
|
|
39,553,000 |
|
|
|
39,118,000 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
9,132,000 |
|
|
|
9,957,000 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
24,766,000 |
|
|
|
22,745,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,115,948,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,121,403,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing |
|
$ |
121,755,000 |
|
|
$ |
133,056,000 |
|
Interest-bearing |
|
|
1,432,995,000 |
|
|
|
1,458,125,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
1,554,750,000 |
|
|
|
1,591,181,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
83,184,000 |
|
|
|
97,465,000 |
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
15,800,000 |
|
|
|
13,800,000 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
230,000,000 |
|
|
|
180,000,000 |
|
Subordinated debentures |
|
|
32,990,000 |
|
|
|
32,990,000 |
|
Other borrowed money |
|
|
4,086,000 |
|
|
|
4,013,000 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
20,843,000 |
|
|
|
23,799,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,941,653,000 |
|
|
|
1,943,248,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value: 1,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Common stock, no par value: 20,000,000 shares authorized;
8,529,729 shares outstanding at March 31, 2008 and
8,527,197 shares outstanding at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
173,134,000 |
|
|
|
172,938,000 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit) |
|
|
(60,000 |
) |
|
|
4,948,000 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
1,221,000 |
|
|
|
269,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
174,295,000 |
|
|
|
178,155,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
2,115,948,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,121,403,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
1
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases, including fees |
|
$ |
29,063,000 |
|
|
$ |
33,422,000 |
|
Securities, taxable |
|
|
2,087,000 |
|
|
|
1,799,000 |
|
Securities, tax-exempt |
|
|
715,000 |
|
|
|
707,000 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
86,000 |
|
|
|
93,000 |
|
Short term investments |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
31,955,000 |
|
|
|
36,025,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
17,103,000 |
|
|
|
18,825,000 |
|
Short term borrowings |
|
|
551,000 |
|
|
|
832,000 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
2,329,000 |
|
|
|
1,194,000 |
|
Long term borrowings |
|
|
589,000 |
|
|
|
690,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
20,572,000 |
|
|
|
21,541,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
11,383,000 |
|
|
|
14,484,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
9,100,000 |
|
|
|
1,020,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision
for loan and lease losses |
|
|
2,283,000 |
|
|
|
13,464,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on accounts |
|
|
504,000 |
|
|
|
389,000 |
|
Earnings on bank owned life insurance policies |
|
|
435,000 |
|
|
|
297,000 |
|
Mortgage banking activities |
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
|
112,000 |
|
Other income |
|
|
711,000 |
|
|
|
610,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
1,890,000 |
|
|
|
1,408,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
5,774,000 |
|
|
|
5,384,000 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
974,000 |
|
|
|
767,000 |
|
Furniture and equipment depreciation, rent and maintenance |
|
|
540,000 |
|
|
|
493,000 |
|
Nonperforming asset costs |
|
|
486,000 |
|
|
|
96,000 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
2,555,000 |
|
|
|
1,999,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expenses |
|
|
10,329,000 |
|
|
|
8,739,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before federal income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(6,156,000 |
) |
|
|
6,133,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(2,418,000 |
) |
|
|
1,850,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(3,738,000 |
) |
|
$ |
4,283,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(0.44 |
) |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(0.44 |
) |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per share |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average basic shares outstanding |
|
|
8,465,148 |
|
|
|
8,436,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average diluted shares outstanding |
|
|
8,465,148 |
|
|
|
8,518,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
(Deficit) |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance, January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
172,938,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,948,000 |
|
|
$ |
269,000 |
|
|
$ |
178,155,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock purchase plan, 2,107 shares |
|
|
23,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend reinvestment plan, 1,511 shares |
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option exercises, 2,000 shares |
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock tendered for stock option exercises,
1,123 shares |
|
|
(16,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
155,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends ($0.15 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,270,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,270,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the period from
January 1, 2008 through March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,738,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,738,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net unrealized gain on
securities available for sale, net of
reclassifications and tax effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
486,000 |
|
|
|
486,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of interest rate
swap, net of tax effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
466,000 |
|
|
|
466,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,786,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
173,134,000 |
|
|
$ |
(60,000 |
) |
|
$ |
1,221,000 |
|
|
$ |
174,295,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY (Continued)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
(Deficit) |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance, January 1, 2007 |
|
$ |
161,223,000 |
|
|
$ |
11,794,000 |
|
|
$ |
(1,102,000 |
) |
|
$ |
171,915,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Declaration of 5% stock dividend on
April 10, 2007 |
|
|
11,131,000 |
|
|
|
(11,135,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock purchase plan, 822 shares |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend reinvestment plan, 698 shares |
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option exercises, 47,818 shares |
|
|
586,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
586,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock tendered for stock option exercises,
16,945 shares |
|
|
(556,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(556,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
84,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends ($0.13 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,125,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,125,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the period from
January 1, 2007 through March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,283,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,283,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net unrealized gain (loss) on
securities available for sale, net of
reclassifications and tax effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,000 |
|
|
|
247,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,530,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
172,515,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,817,000 |
|
|
$ |
(855,000 |
) |
|
$ |
175,477,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Three Months |
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
March 31, 2007 |
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(3,738,000 |
) |
|
$ |
4,283,000 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss)
to net cash from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
526,000 |
|
|
|
661,000 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
9,100,000 |
|
|
|
1,020,000 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
155,000 |
|
|
|
84,000 |
|
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
17,955,000 |
|
|
|
5,895,000 |
|
Origination of mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
(17,756,000 |
) |
|
|
(5,829,000 |
) |
Net gain on sales of mortgage loans |
|
|
(199,000 |
) |
|
|
(66,000 |
) |
Earnings on bank owned life insurance policies |
|
|
(435,000 |
) |
|
|
(297,000 |
) |
Net change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
825,000 |
|
|
|
(710,000 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(1,264,000 |
) |
|
|
1,033,000 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(2,956,000 |
) |
|
|
1,556,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from operating activities |
|
|
2,213,000 |
|
|
|
7,630,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and lease originations and payments, net |
|
|
(68,000 |
) |
|
|
(5,696,000 |
) |
Purchases of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
(46,114,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,509,000 |
) |
Securities held to maturity |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(597,000 |
) |
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
(2,497,000 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
Proceeds from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities, calls and repayments of available for sale securities |
|
|
49,865,000 |
|
|
|
1,543,000 |
|
Maturities, calls and repayments of held to maturity securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
Purchases of premises and equipment, net |
|
|
(521,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,279,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
from (for) investing activities |
|
|
665,000 |
|
|
|
(9,383,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in deposits |
|
|
(36,431,000 |
) |
|
|
39,254,000 |
|
Net decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
(14,281,000 |
) |
|
|
(7,427,000 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased |
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
(9,800,000 |
) |
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
70,000,000 |
|
|
|
25,000,000 |
|
Pay-offs of Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
(20,000,000 |
) |
|
|
(30,000,000 |
) |
Net increase in other borrowed money |
|
|
73,000 |
|
|
|
164,000 |
|
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
23,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
Dividend reinvestment plan |
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
Stock option exercises, net |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
Cash paid in lieu of fractional shares on stock dividend |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
Payment of cash dividend |
|
|
(1,270,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,125,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from financing activities |
|
|
132,000 |
|
|
|
16,139,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
3,010,000 |
|
|
$ |
14,386,000 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
29,430,000 |
|
|
|
51,380,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
32,440,000 |
|
|
$ |
65,766,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
23,294,000 |
|
|
$ |
20,655,000 |
|
Federal income tax |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Transfers from loans and leases to foreclosed assets |
|
|
681,000 |
|
|
|
1,559,000 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. |
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
|
|
Basis of Presentation: The unaudited financial statements for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 include the consolidated results of operations of Mercantile Bank Corporation and
its consolidated subsidiaries. These subsidiaries include Mercantile Bank of Michigan (our
bank), our banks three subsidiaries, Mercantile Bank Mortgage Company, LLC (our mortgage
company), Mercantile Bank Real Estate Co., LLC (our real estate company), and Mercantile
Insurance Center, Inc. (our insurance center). These consolidated financial statements have
been prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Item 303(b) of Regulation
S-K and do not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America for a complete presentation of our financial condition and results
of operations. In the opinion of management, the information reflects all adjustments
(consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which are necessary in order to make the
financial statements not misleading and for a fair presentation of the results of operations for
such periods. The results for the period ended March 31, 2008 should not be considered as
indicative of results for a full year. For further information, refer to the consolidated
financial statements and footnotes included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007. |
|
|
|
We formed a business trust, Mercantile Bank Capital Trust I (the trust), in 2004 to issue
trust preferred securities. We issued subordinated debentures to the trust in return for the
proceeds raised from the issuance of the trust preferred securities. In accordance with FASB
Interpretation No. 46, the trust is not consolidated, but instead we report the subordinated
debentures issued to the trust as a liability. |
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share: Basic earnings per share is based on weighted average common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share include the dilutive effect of
additional potential common shares issuable under stock options and restricted shares and are
determined using the treasury stock method. Stock-based awards for 330,816 and 124,221 shares
of common stock were antidilutive and were not included in determining diluted earnings per
share for the three month periods ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively.
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding equals the weighted average common shares
outstanding during the three month period ended March 31, 2008 due to the net loss recorded
during that time period. |
|
|
|
Stock Dividend: All per share amounts and average shares outstanding have been adjusted
for all periods presented to reflect the 5% stock dividend that was distributed on May 4, 2007.
The Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity reflects a transfer from retained earnings to
common stock for the fair value of the shares distributed. The impact of the 2007 stock
dividend was previously reported as a $14,948,000 million increase to common stock and a
$14,952,000 decrease to retained earnings in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q in 2007. These
financial statements properly reflect this stock dividend as an $11,131,000 increase to common
stock and an $11,135,000 decrease to retained earnings. Management determined this difference
was not material and did not require restatement of previously filed quarterly reports on Form
10-Q. |
(Continued)
7
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. |
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) |
|
|
|
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses: The allowance for loan and lease losses
(allowance) is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses, increased by the
provision for loan and lease losses and recoveries, and decreased by charge-offs. Management
estimates the allowance balance required based on past loan loss experience, the nature and
volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral
values, and economic conditions. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans
and leases, but the entire allowance is available for any loan or lease that, in managements
judgment, should be charged-off. Loan and lease losses are charged against the allowance when
management believes the uncollectibility of a loan or lease balance is likely. |
|
|
|
A loan or lease is impaired when full payment under the loan or lease terms is not expected.
Impairment is evaluated in aggregate for smaller-balance loans of similar nature such as
residential mortgage, consumer and credit card loans, and on an individual loan basis for other
loans. If a loan or lease is impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan
or lease is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loans
or leases existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from
the collateral. Loans and leases are evaluated for impairment when payments are delayed,
typically 30 days or more, or when serious deficiencies are identified within the credit
relationship. |
|
|
|
Derivatives: Derivative financial instruments are recognized as assets or liabilities
at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the use
of the derivatives and whether the derivatives qualify for hedge accounting. Our current
derivatives consist of interest rate swap agreements, which are used as part of our asset
liability management to help manage interest rate risk. We do not use derivatives for trading
purposes. |
|
|
|
Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated as a hedge of the variability of
cash flows to be received on various loans and are effective are reported in other comprehensive
income. They are later reclassified into earnings in the same periods during which the hedged
transaction affects earnings and are included in the line item in which the hedged cash flows
are recorded (e.g., interest income related to our current interest rate swaps). If hedge
accounting does not apply, changes in the fair value of derivatives are recognized immediately
in current earnings as noninterest income or expense. |
|
|
|
If designated as a hedge, we formally document the relationship between derivatives as hedged
items, as well as the risk-management objective and the strategy for undertaking hedge
transactions. This documentation includes linking cash flow hedges to specific assets on the
balance sheet. If designated as a hedge, we also formally assess, both at the hedges inception
and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivative instruments that are used are highly effective
in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged items. Ineffective hedge gains and losses are
recognized immediately in current earnings as noninterest income or expense. We discontinue
hedge accounting when we determine the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes
in the cash flows of the hedged item, the derivative is settled or terminates, or treatment of
the derivatives as a hedge is no longer appropriate or intended. |
(Continued)
8
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. |
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) |
|
|
|
Adoption of New Accounting Standards: In December 2007, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141(R),
Business Combinations, to further enhance the accounting and financial reporting related to
business combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how the
acquirer in a business combination (1) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree, (2) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a
gain from a bargain purchase, and (3) determines what information to disclose to enable users of
the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business
combination. SFAS No. 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on
or after December 15, 2008. Therefore, the effects of the adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) will
depend upon the extent and magnitude of acquisitions after December 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit
fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements
that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new
fair value measurements and was originally effective beginning January 1, 2008. In February
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 157-2. FSP FAS 157-2 allows entities to
electively defer the effective date of SFAS No. 157 until January 1, 2009 for nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities except those recognized or disclosed at fair value on an
annual or more frequently recurring basis. We will apply the fair value measurement and
disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 157 to nonfinancial assets and liabilities effective January
1, 2009. The application of such is not expected to be material to our results of operations or
financial position. See Note 10 for a discussion regarding the January 1, 2008 implementation
of SFAS No. 157 relating to our financial assets and liabilities. |
|
|
|
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at
specified election dates. For items for which the fair value option has been elected,
unrealized gains and losses are to be reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date.
The fair value option is irrevocable unless a new election date occurs, may be applied
instrument by instrument, with a few exceptions, and applies only to entire instruments and not
to portions of instruments. SFAS No. 159 provides an opportunity to mitigate volatility in
reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having
to apply complex hedge accounting. SFAS No. 159 was effective beginning January 1, 2008.
Through March 31, 2008, we have not elected the fair value option for any of our financial
assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161 expands disclosure
requirements regarding an entitys derivative instruments and hedging activities. Expanded
qualitative disclosures that will be required under SFAS No. 161 include: (1) how and why an
entity uses derivative instruments; (2) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
and related interpretations; and (3) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect
an entitys financial statements. SFAS No. 161 is effective beginning January 1, 2009. We do
not expect SFAS No. 161 to have a material effect on our derivative disclosures upon adoption. |
(Continued)
9
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
2. |
|
LOANS |
|
|
|
Our total loans at March 31, 2008 were $1,794.3 million compared to $1,799.9 million at December
31, 2007, a decrease of $5.6 million, or 0.3%. The components of our outstanding balances at
March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, and percentage increase (decrease) in loans from the end
of 2007 to the end of the first quarter 2008 are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
% |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
% |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Real Estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land
development |
|
$ |
268,642,000 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
$ |
263,868,000 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
Secured by 1-4 family
properties |
|
|
133,357,000 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
135,517,000 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
Secured by multi-family
properties |
|
|
53,121,000 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
51,951,000 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Secured by nonresidential
properties |
|
|
855,694,000 |
|
|
|
47.7 |
|
|
|
855,872,000 |
|
|
|
47.6 |
|
|
|
< (0.1 |
) |
Commercial |
|
|
475,777,000 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
484,645,000 |
|
|
|
26.9 |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
Leases |
|
|
2,767,000 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
2,865,000 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
Consumer |
|
|
4,952,000 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
5,162,000 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
$ |
1,794,310,000 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,799,880,000 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
|
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES |
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the change in our allowance for loan and lease losses account for
the three months ended March 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
25,814,000 |
|
|
$ |
21,411,000 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(5,137,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,134,000 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
357,000 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
9,100,000 |
|
|
|
1,020,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31 |
|
$ |
29,957,000 |
|
|
$ |
21,654,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued)
10
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
4. |
|
PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT, NET |
|
|
|
Premises and equipment are comprised of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Land and improvements |
|
$ |
8,538,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,534,000 |
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements |
|
|
24,884,000 |
|
|
|
24,559,000 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
12,357,000 |
|
|
|
12,164,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,779,000 |
|
|
|
45,257,000 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
11,601,000 |
|
|
|
10,906,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
$ |
34,178,000 |
|
|
$ |
34,351,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense amounted to $694,000 during the first quarter of 2008, compared to $624,000
in the first quarter of 2007. |
|
5. |
|
DEPOSITS |
|
|
|
Our total deposits at March 31, 2008 were $1,554.8 million compared to $1,591.2 million at
December 31, 2007, a decrease of $36.4 million, or 2.3%. The components of our outstanding
balances at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, and percentage increase (decrease) in deposits
from the end of 2007 to the end of the first quarter 2008 are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
% |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
% |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Noninterest-bearing demand |
|
$ |
121,755,000 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
$ |
133,056,000 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
(8.5 |
)% |
Interest-bearing checking |
|
|
40,925,000 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
44,491,000 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
Money market |
|
|
14,030,000 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
11,872,000 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
Savings |
|
|
70,400,000 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
80,750,000 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
(12.8 |
) |
Time, under $100,000 |
|
|
50,085,000 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
52,675,000 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
Time, $100,000 and over |
|
|
348,289,000 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
343,296,000 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
645,484,000 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
|
|
666,140,000 |
|
|
|
41.9 |
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Out-of-area time,
under $100,000 |
|
|
130,970,000 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
100,703,000 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
Out-of-area time,
$100,000 and over |
|
|
778,296,000 |
|
|
|
50.1 |
|
|
|
824,338,000 |
|
|
|
51.8 |
|
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
909,266,000 |
|
|
|
58.5 |
|
|
|
925,041,000 |
|
|
|
58.1 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
1,554,750,000 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,591,181,000 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
(2.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued)
11
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
6. SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
Information relating to our securities sold under agreements to repurchase follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Twelve Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
Outstanding balance at end of period |
|
$ |
83,184,000 |
|
|
$ |
97,465,000 |
|
Average interest rate at end of period |
|
|
1.92 |
% |
|
|
2.94 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance during the period |
|
$ |
87,374,000 |
|
|
$ |
88,685,000 |
|
Average interest rate during the period |
|
|
2.29 |
% |
|
|
3.67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum month end balance during the period |
|
$ |
83,184,000 |
|
|
$ |
102,881,000 |
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase agreements) generally have original
maturities of less than one year. Repurchase agreements are treated as financings and the
obligations to repurchase securities sold are reflected as liabilities. Securities involved
with the agreements are recorded as assets of our bank and are held in safekeeping by
correspondent banks. Repurchase agreements are offered principally to certain large deposit
customers. Repurchase agreements were secured by securities with a market value of $96.0
million and $108.1 million as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
|
7. |
|
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADVANCES |
|
|
|
Our outstanding balances at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Maturities April 2008 through March 2012,
fixed rates from 2.95% to 5.34%, averaging 4.23% |
|
$ |
230,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities January 2008 through January 2012,
fixed rates from 4.01% to 5.34%, averaging 4.71% |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
180,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
230,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
180,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each advance is payable at its maturity date, and is subject to a prepayment fee if paid prior
to the maturity date. The advances are collateralized by residential mortgage loans, first
mortgage liens on multi-family residential property loans, first mortgage liens on commercial
real estate property loans, and substantially all other assets of our bank, under a blanket lien
arrangement. Our borrowing line of credit as of March 31, 2008 totaled $319.2 million, with
availability approximating $79.0 million. |
(Continued)
12
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
7. |
|
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADVANCES (Continued) |
|
|
|
Maturities of currently outstanding FHLB advances during the next five years are: |
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
60,000,000 |
|
2009 |
|
|
60,000,000 |
|
2010 |
|
|
45,000,000 |
|
2011 |
|
|
45,000,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
20,000,000 |
|
8. |
|
COMMITMENTS AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK |
|
|
|
Our bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of
business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include
commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Loan commitments to extend credit
are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition
established in the contract. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by
our bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Commitments generally
have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee.
Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total
commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. |
|
|
|
These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount
recognized, if any, in the balance sheet. Our banks maximum exposure to loan loss in the event
of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend
credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of those
instruments. Our bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional
obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. Collateral, such as accounts
receivable, securities, inventory, and property and equipment, is generally obtained based on
managements credit assessment of the borrower. If required, estimated loss exposure resulting
from these instruments is expensed and recorded as a liability. The balance of the liability
account was $0.5 million as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. |
|
|
|
A summary of the contractual amounts of our financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk at
March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Commercial unused lines of credit |
|
$ |
353,686,000 |
|
|
$ |
377,493,000 |
|
Unused lines of credit secured by 1 4 family
residential properties |
|
|
32,078,000 |
|
|
|
33,083,000 |
|
Credit card unused lines of credit |
|
|
9,398,000 |
|
|
|
9,035,000 |
|
Other consumer unused lines of credit |
|
|
5,703,000 |
|
|
|
6,910,000 |
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
|
43,322,000 |
|
|
|
66,196,000 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
81,586,000 |
|
|
|
81,292,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
525,773,000 |
|
|
$ |
574,009,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued)
13
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
8. |
|
COMMITMENTS AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK (Continued) |
|
|
|
Certain of our commercial loan customers have entered into interest rate swap agreements
directly with our correspondent banks. To assist our commercial loan customers in these
transactions, and to entice our correspondent banks to enter into the interest rate swap
transactions with minimal credit underwriting analyses on their part, we have entered into risk
participation agreements with the correspondent banks whereby we agree to make payments to the
correspondent banks owed by our commercial loan customers under the interest rate swap agreement
in the event that our commercial loan customers are unable to do so. We are not a party to the
interest rate swap agreements under
these arrangements. As of March 31, 2008, the total notional amount of the underlying interest
rate swap agreements was $42.9 million, with a net fair value from our commercial loan
customers perspective of negative $0.6 million. We made no payments during the first quarter
of 2008 in regards to the risk participation agreements, and have accrued no liability for such
potential payments. These risk participation agreements are considered financial guarantees in
accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 45 and are therefore recorded as liabilities at fair
value, generally equal to the fees collected at the time of their execution. These liabilities
are accreted into income during the term of the interest rate swap agreements, generally ranging
from four to fifteen years. |
|
9. |
|
HEDGING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
Our interest rate risk policy includes guidelines for measuring and monitoring interest rate
risk. Within these guidelines, parameters have been established for maximum fluctuations in net
interest income. Possible fluctuations are measured and monitored using net interest income
simulation. Our policy provides for the use of certain derivative instruments and hedging
activities to aid in managing interest rate risk to within the policy parameters. |
|
|
|
A majority of our assets are comprised of commercial loans on which the interest rates are
variable, while a majority of our liabilities are comprised of fixed rate certificates of
deposit and FHLB advances. Due to this repricing mismatch, we may periodically enter into
derivative financial instruments to mitigate the exposure in cash flows resulting from changes
in interest rates. |
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2008, we entered into a $100 million two-year interest rate swap
arrangement with a correspondent bank that matures in February 2010. The interest rate swap
qualifies as a cash flow hedge that converts the variable rate cash inflows on certain of our
prime-based commercial loans to a fixed rate of interest. The interest rate swap pays interest
to us at a fixed rate of 5.45% and requires that we make interest payments based on the average
prime rate. The interest rate swap had a fair value of $0.7 million ($0.5 million after tax) at
March 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
The net after-tax derivative gain included in accumulated other comprehensive income at March
31, 2008 is projected to be reclassified into interest income in conjunction with the
recognition of interest payments on the related commercial loans through February 2010, with
approximately $250,000 of after-tax gain expected to be recognized in interest income within the
next year. During the first quarter of 2008, an after-tax derivative loss of $37,000 was
reclassified from other accumulated comprehensive income as a reduction of interest income. |
(Continued)
14
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
9. |
|
HEDGING ACTIVITIES (Continued) |
|
|
|
Retrospective hedge effectiveness for our cash flow hedges is determined using a dollar offset
ratio on a quarterly basis. There were no components of our derivative instruments that were
excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. There were no ineffective gains or losses
associated with cash flow hedges for the first quarter of 2008. |
|
|
|
Early in the second quarter of 2008, we entered into an additional $100 million one-year
interest rate swap arrangement with a correspondent bank that matures in April 2009. The
interest rate swap pays interest to us at a fixed rate of 5.01% and requires that we make
interest payments based on the average prime rate. |
|
10. |
|
FAIR VALUES |
|
|
|
As discussed in Note 1, effective January 1, 2008, we implemented SFAS No. 157 relating to our
financial assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that
prioritizes the use of inputs used in valuation methodologies into the following three levels: |
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets
that we have the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices
for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar
assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or
can be derived from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect our own assumptions about the
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
|
|
The following is a description of our valuation methodologies used to measure and disclose the
fair values of our financial assets and liabilities on a recurring or nonrecurring basis: |
|
|
|
Securities available for sale. Securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a
recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based on quoted prices, if available. If quoted
prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models. Level 1
securities include U.S. Government Agency bonds and mortgage-backed securities issued or
guaranteed by U.S. Government Agencies that are traded by dealers or brokers in active
over-the-counter markets. We have no Level 2 or 3 securities. |
|
|
|
Securities held to maturity. Securities held to maturity are carried at amortized cost when we
have the positive intent and ability to hold them to maturity. The fair value of held to
maturity securities, as disclosed in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, is
based on quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are
measured using independent pricing models. |
(Continued)
15
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
10. |
|
FAIR VALUES (Continued) |
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held for sale. Mortgage loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or
fair value and are measured on a nonrecurring basis. Fair value is based on independent quoted
market prices, where applicable, or the prices for other mortgage whole loans with similar
characteristics. As of March 31, 2008, we determined that the fair value of our mortgage loans
held for sale was similar to the cost; therefore, we carried the $1.5 million of such loans at
cost so they are not included in the nonrecurring table below. |
|
|
|
Loans and leases. We do not record loans and leases at fair value on a recurring basis.
However, from time to time, we record nonrecurring fair value adjustments to collateral
dependent loans and leases to reflect partial write-downs that are based on the observable
market price or current estimated value of the collateral. These loans and leases are reported
in the nonrecurring table below at initial recognition of impairment and on an ongoing basis
until recovery or charge-off. At time of foreclosure or respossession, foreclosed and
repossessed assets are adjusted to fair value less costs to sell upon transfer of the loans and
leases to foreclosed and repossessed assets, establishing a new cost basis. At that time, they
are reported in our fair value disclosures related to nonfinancial assets. |
|
|
|
Derivatives. For interest rate swaps, we measure fair value utilizing models that use primarily
market observable inputs, such as yield curves and option volatilities, and accordingly, are
classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis |
|
|
|
The balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March
31, 2008 are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
$ |
133,978,000 |
|
|
$ |
133,978,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
717,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
717,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
134,695,000 |
|
|
$ |
133,978,000 |
|
|
$ |
717,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We had no assets or liabilities measured at Level 3 during the first quarter of 2008. |
|
|
|
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis |
|
|
|
The balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of
March 31, 2008 are as follows: |
(Continued)
16
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
10. |
|
FAIR VALUES (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
Impaired loans (1) |
|
$ |
22,488,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
22,488,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
(3,714,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
22,488,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
22,488,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
(3,714,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents carrying value and related write-downs for which adjustments are
based on the estimated value of the property. |
|
|
Nonfinancial Assets and Liabilities Subject to FSP FAS 157-b Deferral Provisions |
|
|
|
We will apply the fair value measurement and disclosure
provisions of SFAS No. 157 effective on
January 1, 2009 to nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured on a nonrecurring basis. We
measure
the fair value of the following on a nonrecurring basis: (1) long-lived assets and (2)
foreclosed and repossessed assets. |
11. |
|
REGULATORY MATTERS |
|
|
|
We are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies.
Capital adequacy guidelines and prompt corrective action regulations involve quantitative
measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items calculated under regulatory
accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative
judgments by regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors, and the regulators
can lower classifications in certain cases. Failure to meet various capital requirements can
initiate regulatory action that could have a direct material effect on our financial statements. |
|
|
|
The prompt corrective action regulations provide five classifications, including well
capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and
critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial
condition. If an institution is not well capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept
brokered deposits. Subject to limited exceptions, no institution may make a capital
distribution if, after making the distribution, it would be undercapitalized. If an institution
is undercapitalized, it is subject to being closely monitored by its principal federal
regulator, its asset growth and expansion are restricted, and plans for capital restoration are
required. In addition, further specific types of restrictions may be imposed on the institution
at the discretion of the federal regulator. At March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the most
recent regulatory notifications categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory
framework for prompt corrective action. |
(Continued)
17
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
11. |
|
REGULATORY MATTERS (Continued) |
|
|
|
Our actual capital levels (dollars in thousands) and minimum required levels were: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Required |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to be Well |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Required |
|
Capitalized Under |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Capital |
|
Prompt Corrective |
|
|
Actual |
|
Adequacy Purposes |
|
Action Regulations |
|
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (to risk
weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
230,576 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
$ |
162,858 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
Bank |
|
|
227,228 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
162,556 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
203,195 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Tier 1 capital (to risk
weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
205,074 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
81,429 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
Bank |
|
|
201,773 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
81,278 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
121,916 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Tier 1 capital (to
average assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
205,074 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
84,619 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
Bank |
|
|
201,773 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
84,482 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
105,603 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (to risk
weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
235,700 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
$ |
165,562 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
Bank |
|
|
232,435 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
165,292 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
206,615 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Tier 1 capital (to risk
weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
209,886 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
82,781 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
Bank |
|
|
206,621 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
82,646 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
123,969 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Tier 1 capital (to
average assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
209,886 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
84,169 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
Bank |
|
|
206,621 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
84,061 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
105,076 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
Our consolidated capital levels as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 include the $32.0
million in trust preferred securities issued by the trust subject to certain limitations.
Federal Reserve guidelines limit the amount of trust preferred securities which can be included
in our Tier 1 capital to 25% of total Tier 1 capital. As of March 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007, all $32.0 million of the trust preferred securities were included as Tier 1 capital. |
(Continued)
18
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
11. |
|
REGULATORY MATTERS (Continued) |
|
|
|
Our and our banks ability to pay cash and stock dividends is subject to limitations under
various laws and regulations and to prudent and sound banking practices. On January 8, 2008, we
declared a $0.15 per share cash dividend on our common stock, which was paid on March 10, 2008
to record holders as of February 8, 2008. On April 8, 2008, we declared an $0.08 per share cash
dividend on our common stock, which is payable on June 10, 2008 to record holders as of May 9,
2008. Because we had a retained deficit at the time of the declaration, the cash dividend will
be recorded in the second quarter as a reduction of our common stock account. |
(Continued)
19
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements that are based on managements beliefs,
assumptions, current expectations, estimates and projections about the financial services industry,
the economy, and our company. Words such as anticipates, believes, estimates, expects,
forecasts, intends, is likely, plans, projects, and variations of such words and similar
expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not
guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions (Future
Factors) that are difficult to predict with regard to timing, extent, likelihood and degree of
occurrence. Therefore, actual results and outcomes may materially differ from what may be
expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update,
amend, or clarify forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events
(whether anticipated or unanticipated), or otherwise.
Future Factors include, among others, changes in interest rates and interest rate relationships;
demand for products and services; the degree of competition by traditional and non-traditional
competitors; changes in banking regulation; changes in tax laws; changes in prices, levies, and
assessments; the impact of technological advances; governmental and regulatory policy changes; the
outcomes of contingencies; trends in customer behavior as well as their ability to repay loans;
changes in local real estate values; changes in the national and local economies; and risk factors
described in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. These are
representative of the Future Factors that could cause a difference between an ultimate actual
outcome and a forward-looking statement.
Introduction
The following discussion compares the financial condition of Mercantile Bank Corporation and its
consolidated subsidiaries, Mercantile Bank of Michigan (our bank), our banks three subsidiaries,
Mercantile Bank Mortgage Company, LLC (our mortgage company), Mercantile Bank Real Estate Co.,
LLC (our real estate company) and Mercantile Insurance Center, Inc. (our insurance company), at
March 31, 2008 to December 31, 2007 and the results of operations for the three months ended March
31, 2008 and March 31, 2007. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the interim
consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in this report. Unless the text clearly
suggests otherwise, references in this report to us, we, our or the company include
Mercantile Bank Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries referred to above.
Critical Accounting Policies
Generally accepted accounting principles are complex and require management to apply significant
judgment to various accounting, reporting and disclosure matters. Management must use assumptions
and estimates to apply these principles where actual measurements are not possible or practical.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be
read in conjunction with our unaudited financial statements included in this report. For a
complete discussion of our significant accounting policies, see footnotes to our Consolidated
Financial Statements included on pages F-37 through F-42 in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007 (Commission file number 000-26719). Below is a discussion of our allowance for
loan and lease losses policy. This policy is critical because it is highly dependent upon
subjective or complex judgments, assumptions and estimates. Changes in such estimates may have a
significant impact on the financial statements, and actual results may differ from those estimates.
Management has reviewed the application of this policy with the Audit Committee of our Board of
Directors.
20
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses: The allowance for loan and lease losses (allowance)
is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses, increased by the provision for loan
and lease
losses and recoveries, and decreased by charge-offs. Management estimates the allowance balance
required based on past loan loss experience, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information
about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values, and economic conditions.
Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans and leases, but the entire allowance is
available for any loan or lease that, in managements judgment, should be charged-off. Loan and
lease losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a
loan or lease balance is likely.
A loan or lease is impaired when full payment under the loan or lease terms is not expected.
Impairment is evaluated in aggregate for smaller-balance loans of similar nature such as
residential mortgage, consumer and credit card loans, and on an individual loan basis for other
loans. If a loan or lease is impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan or
lease is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loans or
leases existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the
collateral. Loans and leases are evaluated for impairment when payments are delayed, typically 30
days or more, or when serious deficiencies are identified within the credit relationship.
Financial Condition
During the first three months of 2008, our assets decreased from $2,121.4 million on December 31,
2007, to $2,115.9 million on March 31, 2008. This represents a decrease in total assets of $5.5
million, or 0.3%. The decline in total assets was comprised primarily of a $9.7 million decrease
in net loans, more than offsetting a $3.0 million increase in cash and cash equivalents. Total
deposits declined $36.4 million and securities sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase
agreements) decreased $14.3 million, while Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances increased
$50.0 million.
Commercial loans and leases decreased by $3.2 million during the first three months of 2008, and at
March 31, 2008 totaled $1,656.0 million, or 92.3% of the total loan and lease portfolio. The
outstanding balance of our commercial loan and lease portfolio has remained relatively stable over
the past several quarters, especially in comparison to our strong growth since our inception about
10 years ago. The lack of recent growth primarily reflects the competitive pricing and
underwriting environments within our markets. These competitive pressures, from financial
institutions and other entities such as private equity funds, have negatively impacted the volume
of loans we have booked and accelerated the level of loan payoffs. Despite these competitive
pressures, we remain committed to our traditional standards of underwriting and believe the
long-term benefits of this conservative posture outweigh the likely short-term negative impact to
our net interest income and net income. Our recent loan and lease growth has also been negatively
impacted by our decision to request that certain commercial loan relationships seek financing
elsewhere, as well as an elevated level of loan charge-offs.
The continued significant concentration of the loan and lease portfolio in commercial loans and
leases is consistent with our stated strategy of focusing a substantial amount of our efforts on
wholesale banking. Corporate and business lending is an area of expertise of our senior
management team, and our commercial lenders have extensive commercial lending experience, with most
having at least 10 years experience. Of each of the loan categories that we originate, commercial
loans and leases are most efficiently originated and managed; thus limiting overhead costs by
necessitating the attention of fewer employees. Our commercial lending business generates the
largest portion of local deposits, and is our primary source of demand deposits.
21
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
During the latter part of 2007, our loan review function completed a real estate loan project that
expanded our traditional loan coding paradigm to provide increased specificity in the
categorization of loans secured by real estate. The following table summarizes our loans secured
by real estate, excluding
residential mortgage loans representing permanent financing of owner occupied dwellings and home
equity lines of credit, as of March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Vacant Land |
|
$ |
21,228,000 |
|
Residential Land Development |
|
|
57,276,000 |
|
Residential Construction |
|
|
30,392,000 |
|
Commercial Vacant Land |
|
|
29,052,000 |
|
Commercial Land Development |
|
|
30,415,000 |
|
Commercial Construction NonOwner Occupied |
|
|
79,633,000 |
|
Commercial Construction Owner Occupied |
|
|
10,994,000 |
|
Commercial NonOwner Occupied |
|
|
539,135,000 |
|
Commercial Owner Occupied |
|
|
370,251,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,168,376,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans and consumer loans decreased an aggregate $2.4 million during the first
three months of 2008. As of March 31, 2008, residential mortgage and consumer loans totaled a
combined $138.3 million, or 7.7% of the total loan and lease portfolio. Although we plan to
increase our non-commercial loan portfolios in future periods, we expect the commercial sector of
the lending efforts and resultant assets to remain the dominant loan portfolio category given our
wholesale banking strategy.
Our credit policies establish guidelines to manage credit risk and asset quality. These guidelines
include loan review and early identification of problem loans and leases to provide appropriate
loan and lease portfolio administration. The credit policies and procedures are meant to minimize
the risk and uncertainties inherent in lending. In following these policies and procedures, we
must rely on estimates, appraisals and evaluations of loans and leases and the possibility that
changes in these could occur quickly because of changing economic conditions. Identified problem
loans and leases, which exhibit characteristics (financial or otherwise) that could cause the loans
and leases to become nonperforming or require restructuring in the future, are included on the
internal watch list. Senior management reviews this list regularly.
The level of net loan and lease charge-offs and nonperforming assets increased throughout 2007.
Although we were never directly involved in the underwriting of or the investing in subprime
residential real estate loans, the apparent substantial and rapid collapse of this line of business
during 2007 throughout the United States had a significant negative impact on the residential real
estate development lending portion of our business. The resulting decline in real estate prices
and slowdown in sales stretched the cash flow of our local developers and eroded the value of our
underlying collateral, causing elevated levels of nonperforming assets and net loan and lease
charge-offs.
22
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
As of December 31, 2007, nonperforming assets totaled $35.7 million, or 1.68% of total assets, an
increase from the $9.6 million, or 0.46% of total assets, as of December 31, 2006. As of December
31, 2007, nonperforming loans secured by real estate, combined with foreclosed properties, totaled
$28.6 million, or about 80% of total nonperforming assets. Nonperforming loans and foreclosed
properties associated
with the development of residential real estate totaled $11.1 million, with another $3.2 million in
nonperforming loans secured by, and foreclosed properties consisting of, residential properties.
Net loan and lease charge-offs during 2007 totaled $6.7 million, or 0.38% of average total loans
and leases. Net loan and lease charge-offs during the fourth quarter of 2007 totaled $3.9 million,
or about 58%, of the total net loan and lease charge-offs for all of 2007. During 2006, net loan
and lease charge-offs totaled $4.9 million, or 0.29% of average total loans and leases.
During the first quarter of 2008, we experienced a sudden and rapid deterioration in a number of
commercial loan relationships which previously had been performing fairly well. Analysis of
certain commercial borrowers revealed a reduced capability on the part of these borrowers to make
required payments as indicated by factors such as delinquent loan payments, diminished cash flow,
deteriorating financial performance, or past due property taxes, and in the case of commercial and
residential development projects slow absorption or sales trends. In addition, commercial real
estate is the primary collateral source for many of these borrowing relationships and recently
completed evaluations and appraisals in many cases reflect significant declines from the original
estimated values.
As of March 31, 2008, nonperforming assets totaled $40.6 million, or 1.92% of total assets, an
increase from the $35.7 million, or 1.68% of total assets, as of December 31, 2007, and from the
$12.6 million, or 0.60% of total assets, as of March 31, 2007. As of March 31, 2008, nonperforming
loans secured by real estate, combined with foreclosed properties, totaled $33.7 million, or about
83% of total nonperforming assets. Nonperforming loans and foreclosed properties associated with
the development of residential real estate totaled $13.1 million, with another $4.3 million in
nonperforming loans secured by, and foreclosed properties consisting of, residential properties.
Net loan and lease charge-offs during the first quarter of 2008 totaled $5.0 million, or an
annualized 1.11% of average total loans and leases.
The following table provides a breakdown of nonperforming assets as of March 31, 2008 and net loan
and lease charge-offs during the first quarter of 2008 by property type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming |
|
|
Foreclosed |
|
|
Net Loan & Lease |
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Properties |
|
|
Charge-Offs |
|
Residential Land Development |
|
$ |
8,207,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,903,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,070,000 |
|
Residential Construction |
|
|
2,932,000 |
|
|
|
95,000 |
|
|
|
192,000 |
|
Residential Owner Occupied / Rental |
|
|
3,455,000 |
|
|
|
879,000 |
|
|
|
439,000 |
|
Commercial Land Development |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Commercial Construction |
|
|
271,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Commercial Owner Occupied |
|
|
7,174,000 |
|
|
|
1,498,000 |
|
|
|
368,000 |
|
Commercial NonOwner Occupied |
|
|
6,694,000 |
|
|
|
575,000 |
|
|
|
1,435,000 |
|
Commercial NonReal Estate |
|
|
6,527,000 |
|
|
|
398,000 |
|
|
|
1,443,000 |
|
Consumer NonReal Estate |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
23,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
35,260,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,371,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,957,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
Securities decreased by $0.2 million during the first three months of 2008, totaling $211.5 million
as of March 31, 2008. Proceeds from called U.S. Government Agency bonds totaled $48.0 million
during the first three months of 2008, with another $1.9 million received from principal paydowns
on mortgage-backed securities. A vast majority of the proceeds were invested back into the
securities portfolio, with $31.0 million invested in U.S. Government Agency bonds and $15.1 million
invested in mortgage-backed securities. FHLB of Indianapolis stock increased $2.5 million during the first three months of
2008, supporting the increased level of FHLB advances during the same time period. Our securities
portfolio continues to consist primarily of U.S. Government Agency bonds, mortgage-backed
securities issued or guaranteed by U.S. Government Agencies, investment-grade tax-exempt municipal
securities and FHLB of Indianapolis stock.
Cash and cash equivalents increased $3.0 million during the first three months of 2008, totaling
$32.4 million on March 31, 2008. Cash and due from bank balances were up $2.8 million. Our
commercial lending and wholesale funding focus results in relatively large day-to-day fluctuations
of our cash and cash equivalent balances. The average cash and cash equivalents during the first
three months of 2008 equaled $32.2 million, which includes an average balance of federal funds sold
of $9.8 million. We were in a federal funds purchased position as of March 31, 2008 and December
31, 2007.
Premises and equipment at March 31, 2008 equaled $34.2 million, a decrease of $0.2 million over the
past three months. Purchases of premises and equipment during the first three months of 2008
totaled $0.5 million. Depreciation expense during the first three months of 2008 equaled $0.7
million.
Deposits decreased $36.4 million during the first three months of 2008, totaling $1,554.8 million
at March 31, 2008. Local deposits decreased $20.7 million, while out-of-area deposits decreased
$15.7 million. As a percent of total deposits, local deposits equaled 41.5% on March 31, 2008, a
decrease from 41.9% as of December 31, 2007. Noninterest-bearing demand deposits, comprising 7.8%
of total deposits, decreased $11.3 million during the first three months of 2008. Savings deposits
(4.5% of total deposits) decreased $10.4 million, interest-bearing checking accounts (2.7% of total
deposits) decreased $3.6 million and money market deposit accounts (0.9% of total deposits)
increased $2.2 million during the first three months of 2008. Local certificates of deposit,
comprising 25.6% of total deposits, increased $2.4 million during the first three months of 2008.
The decline in total local deposits is primarily seasonal in nature, with many deposit customers
using funds for federal income tax payments and business-related purposes.
Out-of-area deposits decreased $15.7 million during the first three months of 2008, totaling $909.3
million at March 31, 2008. Out-of-area deposits consist primarily of certificates of deposit
obtained from depositors located outside our market areas and placed by deposit brokers for a fee,
but also include certificates of deposit obtained from the deposit owners directly. The owners of
out-of-area deposits include individuals, businesses and municipal governmental units located
throughout the United States. The decline in out-of-area deposits during the first three months of
2008, which is a continuation of a decline that also took place during 2007, reflects our decision
to increase the use of FHLB advances due to lower interest rates offered on FHLB advance products
in comparison to the relatively higher interest rate environment in the brokered deposit markets.
Repurchase agreements decreased by $14.3 million during the first three months of 2008, totaling
$83.2 million as of March 31, 2008. As part of our sweep account program, collected funds from
certain business noninterest-bearing checking accounts are invested into over-night
interest-bearing repurchase agreements. Such repurchase agreements are not deposit accounts and
are not afforded federal deposit insurance. Like the decline in total local deposits, the decline
in repurchase agreements during the first three months of 2008 is primarily seasonal in nature,
with many deposit customers using funds for federal income tax payments and business-related
purposes.
24
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
Federal funds purchased increased by $2.0 million during the first three months of 2008, equaling
$15.8 million as of March 31, 2008. Our average federal funds purchased position during the first
three months of 2008 was $5.5 million. FHLB advances increased $50.0 million during the first
three months of 2008, totaling $230.0 million as of March 31, 2008. The FHLB advances are
collateralized by residential mortgage loans, first mortgage liens on multi-family residential
property loans, first mortgage liens on commercial real estate property loans, and substantially
all other assets of our bank, under a blanket lien
arrangement. Our borrowing line of credit as of March 31, 2008 totaled $319.2 million, with
availability approximating $79.0 million. FHLB advances, along with out-of-area deposits, are the
primary components of our wholesale funding program.
Liquidity
Liquidity is measured by our ability to raise funds through deposits, borrowed funds, capital or
cash flow from the repayment of loans and securities. These funds are used to meet deposit
withdrawals, fund loans and securities and operate our company. Liquidity is primarily achieved
through the growth of local and out-of-area deposits, advances from the FHLB and federal funds
purchased, as well as liquid assets such as securities available for sale, matured and called
securities, and federal funds sold. Asset and liability management is the process of managing our
balance sheet to achieve a mix of earning assets and liabilities that maximizes profitability,
while providing adequate liquidity.
Our liquidity strategy is to fund earning asset growth with deposits, repurchase agreements and
FHLB advances and to maintain an adequate level of short- and medium-term investments to meet
typical daily loan and deposit activity. Although deposit and repurchase agreement growth from
customers located in our market areas has generally increased, this growth has not been sufficient
to meet our historical significant loan growth and provide monies for additional investing
activities. To assist in providing the additional needed funds, we have regularly obtained monies
from wholesale funding sources. Wholesale funds, comprised of certificates of deposit from
customers outside our market areas and advances from the FHLB, totaled $1,139.3 million, or 61.0%
of combined deposits and borrowed funds as of March 31, 2008. As of December 31, 2007, wholesale
funds totaled $1,105.0 million, or 59.1% of combined deposits and borrowed funds.
Although local deposits have and are expected to increase as new business, governmental and
individual deposit relationships are established and as existing customers increase balances in
their accounts, the relatively high reliance on wholesale funds will likely remain. As part of our
interest rate risk management strategy, a majority of our wholesale funds are comprised of fixed
rate certificates of deposit and FHLB advances that mature within one year, reflecting the fact
that a majority of our loans and leases have a floating rate tied to either Prime or LIBOR rates.
While this maturity strategy increases inherent liquidity risk, we believe the increased liquidity
risk is sufficiently mitigated by the benefits derived from an interest rate risk management
standpoint. In addition, we have developed a comprehensive contingency funding plan which we
believe further mitigates the increased liquidity risk.
Wholesale funds are generally a lower all-in cost source of funds when compared to the interest
rates that would have to be offered in our local markets to generate a commensurate level of funds.
Interest rates paid on new out-of-area deposits and FHLB advances are generally similar to
interest rates paid on new certificates of deposit issued to local customers. In addition, the
overhead costs associated with wholesale funds are considerably less than the overhead costs that
would be incurred to administer a similar level of local deposits, especially if the estimated
costs of a required expanded branching network were taken into account. We believe the relatively
low overhead costs reflecting our limited branch network mitigate our high reliance on wholesale
funds and resulting relatively low net interest margin.
25
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
As a member of the FHLB of Indianapolis, our bank has access to FHLB borrowing programs. At March
31, 2008, advances from the FHLB totaled $230.0 million, an increase of $50.0 million from the
$180.0 million outstanding at December 31, 2007. Based on available collateral at March 31, 2008,
our bank could borrow an additional $79.0 million from the FHLB. Our bank has the ability to
borrow money on a daily basis through correspondent banks via established unsecured federal funds
purchased lines, totaling $62.0 million as of March 31, 2008. The average balance of federal funds
purchased during the first three months of 2008 equaled $5.5 million, compared to a $9.8 million
average federal funds sold position during the same time period.
In addition to typical loan funding and deposit flow, we must maintain liquidity to meet the
demands of certain unfunded loan commitments and standby letters of credit. As of March 31, 2008,
our bank had a total of $444.2 million in unfunded loan commitments and $81.6 million in unfunded
standby letters of credit. Of the total unfunded loan commitments, $400.9 million were commitments
available as lines of credit to be drawn at any time as customers cash needs vary, and $43.3
million were for loan commitments expected to close and become funded within the next twelve
months. We monitor fluctuations in loan balances and commitment levels and include such data in
managing our overall liquidity.
We monitor our liquidity position and funding strategies on an ongoing basis, but recognize that
unexpected events, changes in economic or market conditions, earnings problems, declining capital
levels or situations beyond our control could cause either short or long term liquidity challenges.
While we believe it is unlikely that a funding crisis of any significant degree is likely to
materialize, we have developed a comprehensive contingency funding plan that provides a framework
for meeting both temporary and longer-term liquidity disruptions. Depending upon the particular
circumstances of a liquidity situation, possible strategies may include obtaining funds via one or
a combination of the following sources of funds: established lines of credit at correspondent banks
and the FHLB of Indianapolis, brokered certificate of deposit market, wholesale securities
repurchase markets, issuance of term debt, sale of assets, or sale of common stock or other
securities.
Capital Resources
Shareholders equity is a noninterest-bearing source of funds that provides support for asset
growth. Shareholders equity decreased by $3.9 million during the first three months of 2008, from
$178.2 million on December 31, 2007, to $174.3 million at March 31, 2008. The decrease is
primarily attributable to a net loss of $3.7 million recorded during the first quarter of 2008 and
by the payment of cash dividends totaling $1.3 million. Shareholders equity increased $1.0
million from the mark-to-market adjustments for available for sale securities and our interest rate
swap.
We are subject to regulatory capital requirements primarily administered by federal bank regulatory
agencies. Failure to meet the various capital requirements can initiate regulatory action that
could have a direct material effect on the financial statements. The capital ratios of the company
and our bank as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are disclosed under Note 11 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Our and our banks ability to pay cash and stock dividends is subject to limitations under various
laws and regulations and to prudent and sound banking practices. On January 8, 2008, we declared a
$0.15 per share cash dividend on our common stock, which was paid on March 10, 2008 to record
holders as of February 8, 2008. On April 8, 2008, we declared an $0.08 per share cash dividend on
our common stock, which is payable on June 10, 2008 to record holders as of May 9, 2008. While we
want to maximize shareholder value, which includes the return of capital through cash dividends,
given the current economic environment and its impact on our financial performance, we believed it
was prudent to pay a reduced second quarter cash dividend.
26
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
Results of Operations
We recorded a net loss for the first quarter of 2008 of $3.7 million ($0.44 per basic and diluted
share), compared with net income of $4.3 million ($0.51 per basic share and $0.50 per diluted
share) recorded during the first quarter of 2007. The decline in net income is primarily the
result of significantly lower net interest income and a substantially higher provision for loan and
lease losses. The lower level of net interest income is in large part due to the impact of the
steep decline in interest rates that began late in the third quarter of 2007. With our near term
asset sensitive position, whereby we have a higher magnitude of assets subject to repricing when
compared to the level of liabilities subject to repricing, we have experienced a decline in the
level of net interest income which has more than offset modest growth in earning assets. The higher provision expense reflects the deteriorating quality of certain of our
commercial loan relationships, reflecting the negative impact of Michigans struggling economy on
the borrowers cash flows and the reduction of collateral values.
Interest income during the first quarter of 2008 was $32.0 million, a decrease of 11.3% from the
$36.0 million earned during the first quarter of 2007. The reduction in interest income is
primarily attributable to a declining interest rate environment and an increase in nonperforming
assets, which more than offset a modest increase in earning assets. During the first three months
of 2008, earning assets averaged $2,015.2 million, $61.8 million higher than the average earning
assets of $1,953.4 million during the same time period in 2007. Average loans were up $52.2
million and average securities increased $6.6 million. Negatively impacting interest income was
the decreased yield on earning assets. During the first three months of 2008 and 2007, earning
assets had a weighted average rate (tax equivalent-adjusted basis) of 6.42% and 7.54%,
respectively. With approximately 60% of our total loans and leases tied to the Prime or LIBOR
rates, our earning asset yield has been substantially impacted by the steep reduction in market
interest rates since late third quarter of 2007. Between mid-September 2007 and mid-March 2008,
the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) lowered the targeted federal funds rate by a total of
300 basis points. The resulting similar decline in the Prime and LIBOR rates, combined with an
increased level of nonperforming assets, a very competitive loan and deposit environment and flat
to inverted yield curve over an extended period of time, has significantly negatively impacted our
yield on earning assets and level of interest income.
Interest expense during the first quarter of 2008 was $20.6 million, a decrease of 4.5% over the
$21.5 million expensed during the first quarter of 2007. The reduction in interest expense is
primarily attributable to a declining interest rate environment, which more than offset an increase
in interest-bearing liabilities necessitated by modest asset growth. During the first three months
of 2008, interest-bearing liabilities averaged $1,806.5 million, $57.1 million higher than the
average interest-bearing liabilities of $1,749.4 million during the same time period in 2007.
Average interest-bearing deposits were down $63.4 million, while average short-term borrowings
increased $7.8 million and average FHLB advances were up $112.3 million. A decline in the cost of
interest-bearing liabilities contributed to the reduction of interest expense. During the first
three months of 2008 and 2007, interest-bearing liabilities had a weighted average rate of 4.57%
and 4.99%, respectively. The lower weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities is
primarily due to the decline in market interest rates.
27
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
Net interest income during the first quarter of 2008 was $11.4 million, a decrease of 21.4% over
the $14.5 million earned during the first quarter of 2007. The decrease in net interest income was
primarily due to a decline in the net interest margin, which more than offset the positive impact
from the modest growth in earning assets. The net interest margin decreased from 3.07% during the
first three months of 2007 to 2.33% during the first three months of 2008, primarily reflecting our
yield on earning assets declining at a far greater rate than the reduction in our cost of funds.
Although current deposit and borrowing rates have declined similarly to the reduction in the Prime
and LIBOR rates, our relatively high reliance on fixed rates certificates of deposit and FHLB
advances results in a lagged reduction in our cost of funds in comparison to the reduction in our
yield on earning assets.
Given the multitude of factors that impact the net interest margin, such as FOMC interest rate
decisions, corresponding changes in interest rates for deposits and borrowed funds, shape of the
yield curve, loan and deposit competitive environment, changes in balance sheet structure, level of
nonperforming assets, customer behavior, and potential changes in interest rate risk management
strategies, it is difficult to predict future net interest margins. However, under the current
interest rate environment whereby it appears that the FOMC is nearing the end of interest rate
cuts, our net interest margin should begin to significantly improve as we move into the second part
of 2008 and into 2009. With respect to deposits and FHLB advances, we have about $600 million in
relatively high-rate wholesale funds scheduled to mature during the remainder of 2008 and another
$360 million maturing during 2009. These maturing funds carry an average interest rate of about
5.00%, compared to current interest rates ranging from 2.50% to 3.75% depending on the type and
term of wholesale funding instrument.
The following table sets forth certain information relating to our consolidated average interest
earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and reflects the average yield on assets and
average cost of liabilities for the first quarter of 2008 and 2007. Such yields and costs are
derived by dividing income or expense by the average daily balance of assets or liabilities,
respectively, for the period presented. Tax-exempt securities interest income and yield have been
computed on a tax equivalent basis using a marginal tax rate of 35%. Securities interest income
was increased by $303,000 and $300,000 in the first quarter of 2008 and 2007, respectively, for
this adjustment.
28
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases |
|
$ |
1,793,726 |
|
|
$ |
29,063 |
|
|
|
6.50 |
% |
|
$ |
1,741,531 |
|
|
$ |
33,422 |
|
|
|
7.78 |
% |
Investment securities |
|
|
211,002 |
|
|
|
3,105 |
|
|
|
5.89 |
|
|
|
204,385 |
|
|
|
2,806 |
|
|
|
5.49 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
9,808 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
3.47 |
|
|
|
7,187 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1.78 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest earning
assets |
|
|
2,015,210 |
|
|
|
32,258 |
|
|
|
6.42 |
|
|
|
1,953,416 |
|
|
|
36,325 |
|
|
|
7.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan
and lease losses |
|
|
(26,651 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,899 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
126,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,115,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,058,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing
deposits |
|
$ |
1,469,769 |
|
|
$ |
17,103 |
|
|
|
4.67 |
% |
|
$ |
1,533,215 |
|
|
$ |
18,825 |
|
|
|
4.98 |
% |
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
92,838 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
2.38 |
|
|
|
85,082 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
3.97 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
206,978 |
|
|
|
2,329 |
|
|
|
4.45 |
|
|
|
94,722 |
|
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
36,955 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
6.31 |
|
|
|
36,346 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
7.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing
liabilities |
|
|
1,806,540 |
|
|
|
20,572 |
|
|
|
4.57 |
|
|
|
1,749,365 |
|
|
|
21,541 |
|
|
|
4.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
deposits |
|
|
108,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
22,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
177,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity |
|
$ |
2,115,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,058,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.85 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread
on average assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin on
earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
Provisions for loan and lease losses during the first quarter of 2008 were $9.1 million, compared
to $1.0 million during the first quarter of 2007. The increase primarily reflects a higher level
of net loan and lease charge-offs and the need to increase the reserve to account for identified
weaknesses in parts of our loan and lease portfolio as a result of the continuing decline in the
Michigan economy. We are witnessing the impact of the declining economic environment not only on
residential real estate development that we saw throughout 2007, but now on other sectors as well.
Our real estate collateral values, both residential and commercial, have deteriorated and the cash
flow of some of our borrowers is increasingly strained. In light of the increasingly difficult
economic environment in our markets, and in conjunction with the receipt of 2007 customer financial
statements, during the latter part of the first quarter we conducted a comprehensive review of our
commercial loan portfolio. Through this review, we identified numerous commercial loan
relationships that have deteriorated due to the economic environment. The resulting downgrades of
these relationships account for the sizeable provision for loan and leases losses during the first
quarter of 2008.
Net loan and lease charge-offs of $5.0 million were recorded during the first three months of 2008,
compared to net loan and lease charge-offs of $3.9 million during the fourth quarter of 2007 and
$0.8 million during the first quarter of 2007. Of the $5.1 million in gross loans and leases
charged-off during the first three months of 2008, $2.1 million represents the elimination of
specific reserves that were established in earlier periods (primarily latter one-half of 2007).
The remaining $3.0 million, while in part covered through general reserve allocations via our loan
grading system, is included in the $9.1 million provision that was expensed during the first
quarter of 2008. Provision expense during the first three months of 2008 allocated to commercial
and industrial loans totaled $3.6 million, with another $3.0 million allocated to commercial real
estate loans and $1.0 million to residential real estate development loans. The allowance, as a
percentage of total loans and leases outstanding, was 1.67% as of March 31, 2008, compared to 1.43%
as of December 31, 2007 and 1.24% as of March 31, 2007.
In each accounting period, we adjust the allowance to the amount we believe is necessary to
maintain the allowance at adequate levels. Through the loan and lease review and credit
departments, we attempt to allocate specific portions of the allowance based on specifically
identifiable problem loans and leases. The evaluation of the allowance is further based on, but
not limited to, consideration of the internally prepared Reserve Analysis, composition of the loan
and lease portfolio, third party analysis of the loan and lease administration processes and loan
and lease portfolio and general economic conditions. In addition, the historically strong
commercial loan growth and expansions into new markets are taken into account.
The Reserve Analysis, used since our inception and completed monthly, applies reserve allocation
factors to outstanding loan and lease balances to calculate an overall allowance dollar amount.
For commercial loans and leases, which continue to comprise a vast majority of our total loans and
leases, reserve allocation factors are based upon the loan ratings as determined by our
standardized grade paradigms. For retail loans, reserve allocation factors are based upon the type
of credit. Adjustments for specific loan relationships, including impaired loans and leases, are
made on a case-by-case basis. The reserve allocation factors are primarily based on the recent
levels and historical trends of net loan charge-offs and nonperforming assets, the comparison of
the recent levels and historical trends of net loan charge-offs and nonperforming assets with a
customized peer group consisting of ten similarly-sized publicly traded banking organizations
conducting business in the states of Michigan, Illinois, Indiana or Ohio, the review and
consideration of our loan migration analysis and the experience of senior management making similar
loans and leases for an extensive period of time. We regularly review the Reserve Analysis and
make adjustments based upon identifiable trends and experience.
30
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
The primary risk elements with respect to commercial loans and leases are the financial condition
of the borrower, the sufficiency of collateral, and the lack of timely payment. We have a policy
of requesting and reviewing periodic financial statements from commercial loan and lease customers,
and we periodically review the existence of collateral and its value. The primary risk element
with respect to each instalment and residential real estate loan is lack of timely payment. We
have a reporting system that monitors past due loans and have adopted policies to pursue our rights
in order to preserve our position.
Noninterest income during the first quarter of 2008 was $1.89 million, an increase of 34.2% over
the $1.41 million earned during the first quarter of 2007. Service charge income on deposits and
repurchase agreements increased $115,000 (29.6%) and income from mortgage banking activities
increased $128,000 (114.3%) during the first quarter of 2008, the former primarily reflecting a
decrease in the earnings credit rate and improved collection of overdraft service charges, with the
latter primarily reflecting a higher volume of refinancing activity due to a lower interest rate
environment. Earnings on bank owned life insurance policies increased $138,000 (46.5%), primarily
resulting from increased investments during 2007. We recorded increased fee income in virtually
all other fee income categories during the first quarter of 2008 when compared to the first quarter
of 2007.
Noninterest expense during the first quarter of 2008 was $10.3 million, an increase of 18.2% over
the $8.7 million expensed during the first quarter of 2007. Employee salary and benefit expenses
were $0.4 million higher during the first quarter of 2008 than the level expensed during the same
time period in 2007, primarily reflecting the hiring of additional staff related to our expansion
in Oakland County in late 2007 and annual pay raises. We recorded an increase of $0.3 million in
occupancy, furniture and equipment costs, in large part due to the opening of our new facility in
Lansing during the second quarter of 2007 and the Oakland County expansion. Growth in costs
associated with the administration and resolution of problem assets increased from $0.1 million
during the first quarter of 2007 to $0.5 million during the first quarter of 2008, reflecting the
increased level of nonperforming assets and the decline in collateral values. Other noninterest
costs increased $0.6 million, with $0.3 million representing increased FDIC insurance premiums.
Due to our loss before federal income tax expense of $6.2 million, we recorded a federal income tax
benefit of $2.4 million during the first three months of 2008. During the same time period in
2007, we recorded federal income tax expense of $1.9 million in association with our income before
federal income tax expense of $6.1 million. Our effective tax rate during the first three months
of 2008 was (39.3%), compared to 30.2% during the first three months of 2007. The difference
primarily reflects the significant reduction in income before federal income tax expense (benefit),
and the relationship of tax-exempt income to income before federal income tax expense (benefit).
31
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk and, to a lesser extent, liquidity risk.
All of our transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars with no specific foreign exchange exposure.
We have only limited agricultural-related loan assets and therefore have no significant exposure
to changes in commodity prices. Any impact that changes in foreign exchange rates and commodity
prices would have on interest rates is assumed to be insignificant. Interest rate risk is the
exposure of our financial condition to adverse movements in interest rates. We derive our income
primarily from the excess of interest collected on our interest-earning assets over the interest
paid on our interest-bearing liabilities. The rates of interest we earn on our assets and owe on
our liabilities generally are established contractually for a period of time. Since market
interest rates change over time, we are exposed to lower profitability if we cannot adapt to
interest rate changes. Accepting interest rate risk can be an important source of profitability
and shareholder value; however, excessive levels of interest rate risk could pose a significant
threat to our earnings and capital base. Accordingly, effective risk management that maintains
interest rate risk at prudent levels is essential to our safety and soundness.
Evaluating the exposure to changes in interest rates includes assessing both the adequacy of the
process used to control interest rate risk and the quantitative level of exposure. Our interest
rate risk management process seeks to ensure that appropriate policies, procedures, management
information systems and internal controls are in place to maintain interest rate risk at prudent
levels with consistency and continuity. In evaluating the quantitative level of interest rate
risk, we assess the existing and potential future effects of changes in interest rates on our
financial condition, including capital adequacy, earnings, liquidity and asset quality. Our
interest rate risk policy provides for the use of certain derivative instruments and hedging
activities to aid in managing interest rate risk to within policy parameters. During the first
quarter of 2008, we entered into an interest rate swap to convert the variable rate cash flows on
certain of our prime-based commercial loans to a fixed rate of interest. Early in the second
quarter of 2008, we entered into an additional interest rate swap of the same nature. Further
discussion of our use of, and the accounting for, interest rate swaps is included in Notes 1 and 9
to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We use two interest rate risk measurement techniques. The first, which is commonly referred to as
GAP analysis, measures the difference between the dollar amounts of interest sensitive assets and
liabilities that will be refinanced or repriced during a given time period. A significant
repricing gap could result in a negative impact to our net interest margin during periods of
changing market interest rates. The following table depicts our GAP position as of March 31, 2008
(dollars in thousands):
32
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within |
|
|
Three to |
|
|
One to |
|
|
After |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
Twelve |
|
|
Five |
|
|
Five |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans and leases (1) |
|
$ |
958,754 |
|
|
$ |
57,533 |
|
|
$ |
588,739 |
|
|
$ |
50,975 |
|
|
$ |
1,656,001 |
|
Residential real estate loans |
|
|
56,026 |
|
|
|
6,787 |
|
|
|
57,552 |
|
|
|
12,992 |
|
|
|
133,357 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
2,511 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
4,952 |
|
Investment securities (2) |
|
|
14,568 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
33,931 |
|
|
|
162,722 |
|
|
|
211,526 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(29,957 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
139,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,031,115 |
|
|
|
65,243 |
|
|
|
682,733 |
|
|
|
227,282 |
|
|
|
2,115,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing checking |
|
|
40,925 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
40,925 |
|
Savings |
|
|
70,400 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
70,400 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
14,030 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
14,030 |
|
Time deposits less than $100,000 |
|
|
46,066 |
|
|
|
85,822 |
|
|
|
49,167 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
181,055 |
|
Time deposits $100,000 and over |
|
|
336,965 |
|
|
|
560,501 |
|
|
|
229,119 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,126,585 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
98,984 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
98,984 |
|
FHLB advances |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
37,076 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
37,076 |
|
Noninterest-bearing checking |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
121,755 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
20,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
674,446 |
|
|
|
691,323 |
|
|
|
433,286 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,941,653 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
174,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sources of funds |
|
|
674,446 |
|
|
|
691,323 |
|
|
|
433,286 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,115,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset (liability) GAP |
|
$ |
356,669 |
|
|
$ |
(626,080 |
) |
|
$ |
249,447 |
|
|
$ |
227,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative GAP |
|
$ |
356,669 |
|
|
$ |
(269,411 |
) |
|
$ |
(19,964 |
) |
|
$ |
207,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of cumulative GAP to
total assets |
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
|
(12.7 |
)% |
|
|
(0.9 |
)% |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Floating rate loans that are currently at interest rate floors are treated as fixed
rate loans and are reflected using maturity date and not repricing frequency. |
|
(2) |
|
Mortgage-backed securities are categorized by average life calculations based upon
prepayment trends as of March 31, 2008. |
The second interest rate risk measurement we use is commonly referred to as net interest income
simulation analysis. We believe that this methodology provides a more accurate measurement of
interest rate risk than the GAP analysis, and therefore, serves as our primary interest rate risk
measurement technique. The simulation model assesses the direction and magnitude of variations in
net interest income resulting from potential changes in market interest rates. Key assumptions in
the model include prepayment speeds on various loan and investment assets; cash flows and
maturities of interest sensitive assets and liabilities; and changes in market conditions impacting
loan and deposit volume and pricing. These assumptions are inherently uncertain, subject to
fluctuation and revision in a dynamic environment; therefore, the model cannot precisely estimate
net interest income or exactly predict the impact of higher or lower interest rates on net interest
income. Actual results will differ from simulated
results due to timing, magnitude, and frequency of interest rate changes and changes in market
conditions and our strategies, among other factors.
33
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
We conducted multiple simulations as of March 31, 2008, whereby it was assumed that changes in
market interest rates occurred ranging from up 200 basis points to down 200 basis points in equal
quarterly instalments over the next twelve months. The following table reflects the suggested
impact on our net interest income over the next twelve months, which are well within our policy
parameters established to manage and monitor interest rate risk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar Change In |
|
|
Percent Change In |
|
Interest Rate Scenario |
|
Net Interest Income |
|
|
Net Interest Income |
|
Interest rates down 200 basis points |
|
$ |
7,426,000 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rates down 100 basis points |
|
|
7,692,000 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No change in interest rates |
|
|
7,723,000 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rates up 100 basis points |
|
|
8,848,000 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rates up 200 basis points |
|
|
9,949,000 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
In addition to changes in interest rates, the level of future net interest income is also dependent
on a number of other variables, including: the growth, composition and absolute levels of loans,
deposits, and other earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities; level of nonperforming assets;
economic and competitive conditions; potential changes in lending, investing, and deposit gathering
strategies; client preferences; and other factors.
During the past two quarters, we have experienced a significant reduction in our net interest
income due to the substantial decline in the interest rate environment, resulting from our near
term asset sensitive position whereby we have had a higher magnitude of assets reprice when
compared to the level of liabilities that have repriced. During the remainder of 2008 and into
2009, we have a high volume of fixed rate certificates of deposit and FHLB advances scheduled to
mature that were obtained during periods of higher interest rate environments. As these
instruments mature and are replaced with similar instruments at much lower interest rates, we
anticipate a significant reduction in interest expense and a substantial improvement in net
interest income in future periods. However, for the second quarter of 2008, we do expect a
reduction in our net interest income from what we earned during the first quarter of 2008 as we are
impacted by the 75 basis point reduction in the Prime and LIBOR rates in mid-March and the 25 basis
point reduction in late April.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of March 31, 2008, an evaluation was performed under the supervision of and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based
on that evaluation, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2008.
There have been no significant
changes in our controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2008 that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over
financial reporting.
34
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
From time to time, we may be involved in various legal proceedings that are incidental to our
business. In our opinion, we are not a party to any current legal proceedings that are material to
our financial condition, either individually or in the aggregate.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those previously disclosed in our
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total Number of |
|
|
(d) Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
of Shares that May |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
|
(a) Total Number of |
|
|
(b) Average Price |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
Under the Plans or |
|
Period |
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Paid Per Share |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
Programs |
|
January 1 - 31 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
February 1 - 29 |
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
$ |
14.63 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
March 1 - 31 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Total |
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
$ |
14.63 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
The shares shown in column (a) above as having been purchased were acquired from one of our
employees when she used shares of common stock that she already owned to pay part of the exercise
price when exercising stock options issued under our employee stock option plans.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information.
Not applicable.
35
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
EXHIBIT NO. |
|
EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION |
3.1
|
|
Our Articles of Incorporation are incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2004 |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Our Amended and Restated Bylaws dated as of January 16, 2003
are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of our
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Commission File No.
333-103376) that became effective on February 21, 2003 |
|
|
|
31
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 1350 Chief Executive Officer Certification |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Section 1350 Chief Financial Officer Certification |
36
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on May 9,
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Michael H. Price
|
|
|
|
|
Michael H. Price |
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Charles E. Christmas
|
|
|
|
|
Charles E. Christmas |
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
37
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
EXHIBIT NO. |
|
EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION |
3.1
|
|
Our Articles of Incorporation are incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2004 |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Our Amended and Restated Bylaws dated as of January 16, 2003
are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of our
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Commission File No.
333-103376) that became effective on February 21, 2003 |
|
|
|
31
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 1350 Chief Executive Officer Certification |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Section 1350 Chief Financial Officer Certification |