e424b5
The
information in this preliminary prospectus supplement is not
complete and may be changed. This preliminary prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus are not an offer to
sell these securities and they are not soliciting an offer to
buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(B)(5)
Registration No. 333-147123
|
|
|
PRELIMINARY
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
|
SUBJECT
TO COMPLETION
|
November
2, 2007
|
(To
Prospectus dated November 2, 2007)
6,875,000 Shares
WILLBROS GROUP,
INC.
Common
Stock
We are offering 6,875,000 shares of our common stock to be
sold in this offering.
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol WG. On October 31, 2007, the last
reported sale price of our common stock on the New York Stock
Exchange was $38.27 per share.
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
Before buying any shares, you should read the discussion of
material risks of investing in our common stock in Risk
factors beginning on
page S-16.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this
prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to us
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriters may also purchase up to an additional
1,031,250 shares of our common stock at the public offering
price, less the underwriting discounts and commissions payable
by us, to cover
over-allotments,
if any, within 30 days of the date of this prospectus
supplement. If the underwriters exercise this option in full,
the total underwriting discounts and commissions will be
$ , and our total proceeds, before
expenses, will be $ .
The underwriters are offering the shares of our common stock as
set forth under Underwriting. Delivery of the shares
of common stock will be made on or
about ,
2007.
Joint
Book-Running Managers
|
|
UBS
Investment Bank |
Credit
Suisse |
Calyon
Securities (USA) Inc.
|
|
|
Bear,
Stearns & Co. Inc. |
D.
A. Davidson & Co. |
Natixis
Bleichroeder Inc. |
You should rely only on the information contained and
incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement and the
accompanying prospectus. We have not, and the underwriters have
not, authorized anyone to give you different or additional
information. You should not assume that the information in this
prospectus supplement and accompanying prospectus is accurate as
of any date after their respective dates.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
Prospectus
supplement
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-1
|
|
|
S-12
|
|
|
S-13
|
|
|
S-16
|
|
|
S-29
|
|
|
S-31
|
|
|
S-32
|
|
|
S-33
|
|
|
S-34
|
|
|
S-35
|
|
|
S-36
|
|
|
S-39
|
|
|
S-44
|
|
|
S-47
|
|
|
S-67
|
|
|
S-91
|
|
|
S-93
|
|
|
S-96
|
|
|
S-102
|
|
|
S-105
|
|
|
S-106
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
Prospectus
|
|
|
|
About this Prospectus
|
|
2
|
Willbros Group, Inc.
|
|
2
|
Risk Factors
|
|
2
|
Cautionary Note Regarding Forwarding-Looking Statements
|
|
3
|
Use of Proceeds
|
|
5
|
Description of Capital Stock
|
|
6
|
Plan of Distribution
|
|
10
|
Legal Matters
|
|
12
|
Experts
|
|
12
|
Where You Can Find More Information
|
|
12
|
Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference
|
|
12
|
i
[THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK]
Prospectus
supplement summary
This summary highlights selected information contained
elsewhere in or incorporated by reference in this prospectus
supplement and accompanying prospectus and may not contain all
of the information that is important to you. This prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus include information
about the shares we are offering as well as information
regarding our business and detailed financial data. You should
read this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus
in their entirety, including Risk factors, and the
information incorporated by reference in this prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus. In this prospectus
supplement, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms
Willbros, we, us and the
Company refer to Willbros Group, Inc. and its
predecessors and subsidiaries; the term InServ
refers to Integrated Service Company LLC, a company we agreed to
acquire pursuant to a share purchase agreement dated
October 31, 2007, a transaction which we refer to as the
InServ acquisition.
OUR
COMPANY
We are a provider of services primarily to the high growth
global energy infrastructure market. In particular, we are a
leading service provider to the hydrocarbon pipeline market,
having performed work in 59 countries and constructed over
200,000 kilometers of pipelines, which we believe positions us
in the top tier of pipeline contractors in the world. We offer a
wide range of services to our customers, including engineering,
project management, construction services and specialty
services, such as operations and maintenance, each of which we
offer discretely or in combination as a fully integrated
offering (which we refer to as EPC).
We offer clients full asset lifecycle services and in some cases
we provide the entire scope of services for a project, from
front-end engineering and design through procurement,
construction, commissioning and ongoing facility operations and
maintenance. While our capabilities extend from upstream sources
to downstream distribution, our primary end market is the global
onshore midstream energy market. In North America, where we
currently have over 90 percent of our backlog, our projects
include major cross-country and intrastate pipelines that
transport natural gas, crude oil and petroleum products; gas
gathering systems; gas processing systems; oil and gas
production facilities; and modular processing facilities. The
balance of our backlog is for projects providing similar
services in select overseas locations. Now in our one hundredth
year, we serve major natural gas, petroleum and power companies
and government entities worldwide.
On October 31, 2007, we entered into a share purchase
agreement pursuant to which we agreed to acquire all of the
outstanding equity interests of InServ, a Tulsa, Oklahoma based
company, for approximately $225 million. With the
acquisition of InServ, we will significantly expand our service
offering to the downstream market providing integrated solutions
for turnaround, maintenance and capital projects for the
hydrocarbon processing and petrochemical industries. We believe
that the growth in the market addressed by InServ is
attributable to numerous factors, including:
|
|
Ø
|
continued strength in maintenance, repair and overhaul, and
capital spending;
|
|
Ø
|
a need to upgrade or convert existing refineries to facilitate a
shift to heavier and more sour crude streams, particularly from
the Canadian oil sands;
|
|
Ø
|
an increasing emphasis on safety;
|
|
Ø
|
a decline in the number of operating refineries over the past
15 years, combined with an aging refinery infrastructure,
averaging over 30 years in service, is resulting in higher
ongoing refinery utilization rates requiring increasing
maintenance and expansion expenditures; and
|
|
Ø
|
an increasing level of outsourcing of refinery services as
producers focus on core operations.
|
For a more detailed discussion of the InServ acquisition, see
Pending acquisition.
We believe our existing end markets are in the midst of a
prolonged period of significant growth. A February 2007
Oil & Gas Journal survey indicates
approximately 67,000 miles of new pipeline are
S-1
proposed to be placed in service globally over the next decade,
with North America representing the largest opportunity with
over 26,000 miles of planned pipeline construction. Based
on data from Douglas-Westwood, an industry consultant, this
infrastructure build-out is estimated to require expenditures of
approximately $180 billion globally with approximately
$43 billion of that amount to be dedicated to North America
over the period from 2008 to 2012. We believe that the North
American energy infrastructure market is poised for a multi-year
expansion, driven by the need to replace and upgrade an aging
infrastructure as well as develop additional infrastructure to
bring energy from new sources to market. The rapid development
of new energy supplies in the Canadian oil sands and new basins
in the United States, such as the Rocky Mountains, the Barnett
Shale and the Fayetteville Shale, requires transportation
resources not addressed by existing infrastructure. For example,
according to the National Energy Board (Canada), capital
expenditures on new bitumen production and processing facilities
are expected to exceed Cdn$100 billion through 2015. We
believe these strong industry fundamentals will contribute to
continued strong demand for our services in the future as
synthetic crude oil production levels are expected to triple
over the same time frame. This processing capacity expansion
will in turn require significant investment in energy
transportation infrastructure.
As of October 14, 2007, we have identified over
$12.4 billion in qualified prospects in North America and
other select international locations, including
$3.0 billion of projects for which we either have bids
pending or in preparation. We are currently deploying the
majority of our resources to North America due to the
significant opportunity and favorable risk-adjusted return
profile of this region. In July 2007, we acquired Midwest
Management (1987) Ltd. (Midwest), expanding our
existing capabilities in the attractive Canadian market with
cross-country pipeline construction services. In addition, we
also expect that the international markets will continue to
offer attractive opportunities as new energy infrastructure
developments are contemplated in North Africa (Algeria and
Libya) and the Middle East (Oman, Saudi Arabia and the United
Arab Emirates). We have a successful history of operating in
these regions, which we believe represent favorable markets to
pursue due to their growth prospects and relative stability. We
believe we are also well-positioned to take advantage of
additional international opportunities when they present a
compelling risk-adjusted return comparable to that of the North
American market.
Given our strong reputation in the industry and favorable
competitive environment, we have been successful in driving
significant backlog growth primarily consisting of negotiated
contracts, which typically carry more favorable terms compared
to competitively bid contracts. We have booked a near record
backlog in North America, which we believe is currently one of
the most attractive markets in the world for our services. As of
September 30, 2007, our backlog for continuing operations
of $1.1 billion represented an increase of
82.5 percent as compared to December 31, 2006. We have
also successfully re-balanced our contract portfolio during the
first nine months of 2007 to lower-risk cost-reimbursable work,
which represents 75 percent of backlog at
September 30, 2007 versus 45 percent at
December 31, 2006. New orders taken, net of cancellations,
in the first nine months of 2007 of $1.1 billion
represented an increase of 27 percent over the prior year
period, and include significant construction projects such as
the SouthEast Supply Header project for Spectra Energy, the
Mid-Continent Express Project for Kinder Morgan and the
Ft. McMurray Area pipeline project for TransCanada, the
first major pipeline construction contract awarded to our
Midwest business since it was acquired in July 2007.
With the sale of our Nigerian business in February 2007, we
exited all international markets with a significantly elevated
risk profile. In doing so, we redeployed approximately
$40.0 million of the sale proceeds to focus on the more
attractive market in North America. Our ongoing discussions with
potential customers regarding pipeline and station construction
projects in North America and recent contract awards, coupled
with the increase in engineering engagements, reinforce our
belief that our ability to obtain improved terms and conditions
and better pricing will continue throughout the next several
years.
S-2
|
|
|
BACKLOG BY GEOGRAPHY
|
|
BACKLOG(1)
BY CONTRACT TYPE
|
AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2007$1.1BN
|
|
(in billions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Backlog of Willbros continuing
operations; dollar figures represent backlog at the end of each
period. |
We provide services to our customers through three segments:
|
|
Ø
|
Engineering. We specialize in providing
engineering services, from feasibility studies to detailed
design work, to assist clients in conceptualizing, evaluating,
designing and managing the construction or expansion of
pipelines, compressor stations, pump stations, fuel storage
facilities, field gathering facilities and production facilities.
|
|
Ø
|
Construction. Our construction
expertise includes systems, personnel and equipment to construct
and replace large-diameter cross-country pipelines; fabricate
engineered structures, process modules and facilities; and
construct oil and gas production facilities, pump stations, flow
stations, gas compressor stations, gas processing facilities and
other related facilities. We also provide certain specialty
services to increase our equipment and personnel utilization.
|
|
Ø
|
Engineering, procurement and
construction. Our fully integrated EPC
services offering includes the full range of engineering,
procurement, construction and project management services to
provide end-to-end total project solutions to our customers.
|
S-3
An overview of the various services we provide and our
locations, employees and backlog as of September 30, 2007
is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering
|
|
Construction
|
|
EPC
|
|
|
Services
|
|
Services
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Services
Provided:
|
|
Project management
Feasibility studies
Conceptual engineering & detailed
design
Route/site selection
Construction management
Material procurement
Commissioning/startup
assistance
Facilities operations
Field services (surveying, right-of-way
acquisition)
|
|
Cross-country onshore pipelines
Pump, compressor and flow stations
Fabrication
Highway, rail and river crossings
Valve stations
Pipeline rehabilitation and
requalification
Gas processing plants
Production facilities
Specialty services
|
|
Turnkey EPC arrangements incorporating
some or all of our engineering & construction services
|
|
|
Locations:
|
|
Salt Lake City, UT
|
|
Houston, TX
|
|
Project specific
|
|
|
Tulsa, OK
|
|
Edmonton, AB
|
|
|
|
|
Kansas City, MO
|
|
Ft. McMurray, AB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Muscat, Oman
|
|
|
|
|
Employees:
|
|
329
|
|
3,648
|
|
170
|
|
|
Backlog (in millions):
|
|
$89.5
|
|
$883.4
|
|
$126.0
|
|
|
We execute our projects utilizing a large, well-maintained fleet
of owned and leased construction, transportation and support
equipment. We also regularly rent pipeline construction
equipment from specialized rental operators to supplement our
owned or leased equipment in periods of high activity. Our
equipment fleet is divided into units of equipment, which we
call spreads, which are typically capable of
constructing 50 to 75 miles of large diameter pipeline in a
three- to four-month period. A spread includes numerous
individual units of a particular equipment category, including:
pipe layers, excavators, automatic welding units, bulldozers,
heavy trucks, crew trucks, as well as other critical equipment.
In 2006 and the first nine months of 2007, expenditures for
capital equipment were $18.0 million and
$15.9 million, respectively. Given the expected expansion
of our project activity in North America over the next three
years, we anticipate significantly expanding our equipment fleet
to take advantage of the attractive economic returns of
utilizing owned-equipment on cost-reimbursable projects, where
ownership costs are less than prevailing rental rates. We are
able, under the terms of these contracts, to utilize prevailing
rental rates as the basis for our costs and fixed fees on the
project. Expansion of our capital equipment base will also
increase our ability to secure and execute additional projects.
We expect to acquire approximately $50 million of
construction equipment in the next 12 months.
OUR
HISTORY
We have a rich history that traces back to the early days of the
oil and gas infrastructure business in the United States and
abroad in the early 1900s. We trace our roots to the original
construction business of Williams Brothers Company which was
founded in 1908. We have been employed by more than 400 clients
to carry out work in 59 countries. Since 1908, we have
constructed over 200,000 kilometers of hydrocarbon pipelines,
which we believe positions us in the top tier of pipeline
contractors in the world. We have completed many of the landmark
pipeline construction projects, including the Big
Inch and
S-4
Little Big Inch War Emergency Pipelines
(1942-44),
the
Mid-America
Pipeline (1960), the TransNiger Pipeline
(1962-64),
the Trans-Ecuadorian Pipeline
(1970-72),
the northernmost portion of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System
(1974-76),
the
All-American
Pipeline System
(1984-86),
Colombias Alto Magdalena Pipeline System
(1989-90), a
portion of the Pacific Gas Transmission System expansion
(1992-93),
and through a joint venture led by a subsidiary of ours, the
Chad-Cameroon Pipeline
(2000-03).
PENDING INSERV
ACQUISITION
InServ
On October 31, 2007, we entered into a share purchase
agreement pursuant to which we agreed to acquire all of the
outstanding equity interests in InServ. The aggregate purchase
price of the InServ acquisition is approximately
$225 million, of which $202.5 million will be paid in
cash and the balance paid in Willbros common stock. The purchase
price for the InServ acquisition is subject to a possible
increase or reduction in the event that InServs working
capital at the closing date is more or less than a specified
amount.
InServ is an integrated, full-service specialty contractor
providing construction, turnaround, repair and maintenance
services to the downstream energy infrastructure market, which
consists primarily of refineries and petrochemical facilities.
InServs core competencies include turnkey project
execution through program management and engineering,
procurement and construction services, which complement our EPC
service offerings in the midstream market. InServ is one of the
four major contractors in the US that provides services for the
overhaul of high-utilization fluid catalytic cracking units, the
primary gasoline-producing unit in refineries. These catalytic
cracking units, which operate continuously for long periods of
time, are typically overhauled on a three- to five-year cycle.
InServ also provides similar turnaround services for other
refinery process units as well as specialty services associated
with welding, piping and process heaters. InServ has performed
projects for 60 of the 149 operating refineries in the United
States, providing a range of services to customers including
Valero, ChevronTexaco, Marathon, ExxonMobil, BP and
ConocoPhillips.
The majority of InServs service offerings are comprised of
six primary activities: construction, construction and
turnaround services, field services, manufacturing, tank and
turnkey project services. Additionally, InServ manufactures
specialty components for refineries and petrochemical plants
which require high levels of expertise, such as heater coils,
alloy piping and other components.
InServ is led by a highly experienced management team with an
average of over 30 years of industry experience. InServ
provides a single source offering to customers and self performs
a majority of the work it contracts, which is critical to
customers operating and maintaining large capital investments in
refineries and other processing plants. The large capital
investments and the inherent risks in processing hydrocarbons in
the plants and refineries which InServ operates demand date- and
cost-certain project completion, as well as high work quality
and safe operations. InServ also provides numerous ancillary
services, including tank services, safety services and heater
services.
Since its founding in 1994, InServ has experienced rapid and
profitable growth. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, InServ generated revenue and operating
income of $253.7 million and $22.3 million,
respectively. For the five years ended December 31, 2006,
InServs revenue and operating income grew at a compound
annual rate of 25.3 percent and 45.5 percent,
respectively. Since its inception, InServ has experienced strong
growth and is in the midst of a market with strong fundamental
drivers including aging infrastructure combined with capacity
constraints, increased emphasis on preventive maintenance,
substantial emphasis on safety, record oil prices and demand for
hydrocarbon derivatives. These positive market drivers have
contributed to a substantial increase in InServs backlog
to $210.5 million as of September 30, 2007, a 33.0
percent increase in backlog over December 31, 2006. An
industry survey completed by Hydrocarbon Processing
magazine anticipated over $17 billion will be spent in the
United States on capital and maintenance projects in the
refining and petrochemical sectors in 2007. Over $8 billion
of this anticipated spending is expected to be in the
S-5
petrochemical sector, an end market which represents a growth
opportunity for InServ. We also believe growth opportunities in
these markets are driven by a shift to heavier and more sour
crude streams and greater outsourcing of refinery services as
producers increasingly focus on core operations. InServ also
benefits from the shift to more favorable contract terms and
conditions as represented by the fact that over 75 percent
of its current contract backlog is cost-reimbursable.
Rationale for the
InServ acquisition
Complementary service offerings. The addition
of InServ will add new service lines to our business, many of
which are sold to current customers of Willbros. As a result, we
will be able to offer existing Willbros and InServ clients a
more complete range of services. For example, the tank services
and EPC offerings of InServ are complementary to the service
offerings of Willbros and afford growth opportunities in both
the midstream and downstream sectors. In addition, InServs
downstream focus adds further diversification across the
hydrocarbon value chain. InServs focus on maintenance,
repair and overhaul projects that are necessary for the
continuous and safe operation of the many processing units of a
refinery will help mitigate the effect of spending cycles in the
pipeline industry. We also believe there may be opportunities
for growth through selective and strategic acquisitions of
businesses or assets complementary to InServs current
service offering.
Expand geographic reach. Inservs
capabilities span the United States, as evidenced by Inserv
having provided services to 60 of the 149 operable refineries in
the country. Broad geographic reach is important to customers as
it enables the company to rapidly mobilize people, materials and
equipment. We believe that the expanded geographic reach of the
combined businesses will position us to capture incremental
revenue opportunities. Furthermore, our strong position in the
Canadian oil sands provides InServ access to this rapidly
growing market. We expect that the maintenance market for
processing facilities will provide a significant opportunity
following the Cdn$100 billion of facility capital
investment which is expected to occur by 2015.
Consistent and conservative financial management with
contracts focused on risk-adjusted return. InServ
has demonstrated consistent top- and bottom-line growth, while
maintaining a balance sheet with minimal debt. Over
75 percent of InServs backlog is cost-reimbursable
with a significant weighting toward maintenance, repair and
overhaul activities. We believe that InServs conservative
approach to operating their business is consistent with our
approach.
Long-term customer relationships with significant
overlap. InServ has a premier brand name and
reputation among the worlds largest refining and
petrochemical operators. InServ serves a blue-chip customer
base, most with repeat business over many years and several with
management relationships extending over 30 years. Several
of these customers are also existing customers of Willbros. We
believe that these quality relationships are complementary to
our existing customer base, enabling the combined entity to
enhance revenue opportunities across a broad base of service
offerings.
Strong cultural fit. Willbros management has
an established relationship with the management of InServ that
we believe will facilitate the integration process. We believe
that InServs high cultural similarity with Willbros,
coupled with a customer base which is well known to us and lack
of services overlap, make it an excellent opportunity to expand
our market and provide a recurring revenue stream.
OUR COMPETITIVE
STRENGTHS
We believe that we have a leading position relative to our peers
in the markets in which we currently operate as a result of key
competitive strengths, including:
|
|
Ø |
Leading position in high growth hydrocarbon transportation
market supported by a strong global brand and reputation of
quality execution expertise. We believe we are
one of the largest engineering and construction service
providers in the world focused primarily on pipelines and other
infrastructure critical to the transportation of hydrocarbons.
Our global execution platform, experience and substantial fleet
of construction equipment provide us with an advantage over
smaller
|
S-6
|
|
|
competitors with more limited resources and larger service
providers, many of whom have committed significant resources to
upstream and downstream processing facilities. In addition, we
are well positioned to capitalize on the increasing need to
maintain or replace older pipelines and expand into related
services which augment our core expertise.
|
|
|
Ø
|
Our ability to execute complex, fully integrated EPC
projects. We offer our customers fully integrated
EPC capabilities addressing the complete project lifecycle from
early stage development and feasibility studies through
execution, including project management, construction, and
ongoing maintenance services. We are one of the few specialized
service providers capable of offering this comprehensive
solution in the pipeline market. Our customers are increasingly
recognizing the benefits of integrated EPC services resulting
from our early involvement in a project. Early involvement in
all aspects of a project allows us to better determine the most
efficient design, permitting, procurement and construction
sequence and strategy for a project. Increased control over the
entire scope of a project also improves execution efficiencies,
which allows us to generate higher margins for the engineering
and construction portions of the project while capturing
incremental revenue and margin opportunities through the
material procurement phase.
|
|
Ø
|
Strong relationships with long standing
customers. We have well-established relationships
with major natural gas and petroleum industry participants, many
of whom are leaders in their respective markets, including
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell,
Energy Transfer Partners, El Paso Energy, SynCrude and
Occidental Petroleum. We were able to develop and maintain these
relationships due to our success in understanding and meeting
our customers objectives. We believe that industry growth
will continue to drive larger and more complex projects in a
market where strong customer relationships and proven execution
capabilities will be critical in increasing our market share.
Our established safety and performance track record,
well-maintained fleet of equipment and deep staff of
well-trained, experienced engineers, project managers, and field
operators position us to continue to win new projects from our
legacy and new customers.
|
|
Ø
|
Experienced workforce and management team. Our
management team and skilled workforce include professionals with
significant industry experience and technical expertise. Our
senior executive team averages over 25 years of relevant
industry experience, and many of our managers have led projects
both domestically and overseas. Our new management team has
positioned us to capture substantial growth opportunities in a
strong environment.
|
OUR BUSINESS
STRATEGY
Our strategy is to increase stockholder value by leveraging our
competitive strengths to take advantage of the current
opportunities in the global energy infrastructure market and
position ourselves for sustained long-term growth. Core tenets
of our strategy include:
Focus on managing risk. Led by our new
management team, we have implemented a core set of business
conduct, practices and policies which have fundamentally
improved our risk profile. We have implemented our risk
management policy by exiting higher risk countries, increasing
our activity levels in lower risk countries, diversifying our
service offerings and end markets, practicing rigorous financial
management and limiting contract execution risk. Risk management
is emphasized throughout all levels of the organization and
covers all aspects of a project from strategic planning and
bidding to contract management and financial reporting. We have
implemented stricter controls and enhanced risk assessment and
believe these processes will enable us to more effectively
evaluate, structure and execute future projects, thereby
increasing our profitability and reducing our execution risk.
|
|
Ø |
Focus resources in markets with the highest risk-adjusted
return. North America currently offers us the
highest risk-adjusted returns and the majority of our resources
are focused on this region. However, we continue to seek
international opportunities which can provide superior
risk-adjusted returns and believe our extensive international
experience is a competitive advantage. We believe that markets
in North Africa and the Middle East, where we also have
substantial experience, may offer attractive opportunities for
us in the future given mid- and long-term industry trends.
|
S-7
|
|
Ø
|
Maintain a conservative contract
portfolio. Our current contract portfolio is
composed of 75 percent cost-reimbursable work which
provides for a more equitable allocation of risk between us and
our customers. While strong current market conditions have been
beneficial in transitioning our backlog away from higher-risk,
fixed-price contracts, we intend to maintain a balanced
risk-to-reward portfolio.
|
|
Ø
|
Ethical business practices. We demand that all
of our employees and representatives conduct our business in
accordance with the highest ethical standardsin compliance
with applicable laws, rules and regulations, with honesty and
integrity, and in a manner which demonstrates respect for
others. The Willbros tradition of doing the right
thing and abiding by the rule of law is reflected in our
longstanding Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
|
Leverage core service expertise into additional full EPC
contracts. Our core expertise and service
offerings allow us to provide our customers with a single source
EPC solution which creates greater efficiencies to the benefit
of both our customers and our company. In performing integrated
EPC contracts, we establish ourselves as overall project
managers from the earliest stages of project inception and are
therefore better able to efficiently determine the design,
permitting, procurement and construction sequence for a project
in connection with making engineering decisions. Our customers
benefit from a more seamless execution, while for us, these
contracts often yield higher profit margins on the engineering
and construction components of the contract compared to
stand-alone contracts for similar services. Additionally, this
contract structure allows us to deploy our resources more
efficiently and capture both the engineering and construction
components of these projects.
Leverage core capabilities and industry reputation into a
broader service offering. We believe our
market is characterized by increasingly larger projects and a
constrained resource base. Potential customers are invoking
buying criteria other than price, such as safety performance,
schedule certainty and specialty expertise. Our established
platform and track record strongly position us to capitalize on
this trend by leveraging our expertise into a broader range of
related service offerings. While we currently provide a number
of discrete services to both our core and other end-markets, we
believe additional opportunities exist to expand our core
capabilities through both acquisitions and internal growth
initiatives. We strive to leverage our project management,
engineering and construction skills to establish additional
service offerings, such as instrumentation and electrical
services, turbo-machinery services, environmental services and
pipeline system integrity services. We expect this approach to
enable us to attract more critical service resources in a tight
market for both qualified personnel and critical equipment
resources, establishing us as one of the few contractors able to
do so.
Establish and maintain financial
flexibility. Increasingly larger projects and
the complex interaction of multiple projects simultaneously
underway require us to have the financial flexibility to meet
material, equipment and personnel needs to support our project
commitments. We intend to use our credit facility for
performance letters of credit, financial letters of credit and
cash borrowings. Following the successful completion of this
transaction, we will focus on maintaining a strong balance sheet
to enable us to achieve the best terms and conditions for our
credit facilities and bonding capacities. Our continued emphasis
is on the maintenance of a strong balance sheet to maximize
flexibility and liquidity for the development and growth of our
business. We also employ rigorous cash management processes to
ensure the continued improvement of cash management, including
processes focused on improving contract terms as they relate to
project cash flows.
S-8
OTHER RECENT
EVENTS
New senior credit
facility
Concurrent with the closing of the offering contemplated by this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus and the
InServ acquisition, our wholly-owned subsidiary,
Willbros USA, Inc., intends to replace the existing three
year $100.0 million senior secured synthetic credit
facility with a new three year senior secured
$150.0 million revolving credit facility due 2010 and a
four year $100.0 million term loan facility due 2011 (the
2007 Credit Facility) with a group of banks led by
Calyon New York Branch (Calyon). We currently have
$250.0 million of commitments for the 2007 Credit Facility.
Our existing facility is costlier (including a five percent per
annum facility fee) than the 2007 Credit Facility and contains
numerous results which have restricted our financial
flexibility. With our improving financial condition, we have
been able to significantly improve the terms and conditions in
our 2007 Credit Facility and we expect that the 2007 Credit
Facility will enhance our financial flexibility, reduce our
credit expense and provide added financial support to our growth
strategy.
Our obligations under the 2007 Credit Facility will be
guaranteed by Willbros Group, Inc. and all of its material
foreign and domestic subsidiaries and will be secured by a first
priority security interest in all existing and future acquired
assets of those companies and of Willbros USA, Inc. We will have
the option, subject to Calyons consent, to increase the
size of the revolving credit facility to $200.0 million
within the first two years of the closing date of the 2007
Credit Facility. We will be able to utilize 100 percent of
the revolving credit facility to issue performance letters of
credit and 33.3 percent of the facility for cash advances
and financial letters of credit.
We expect that the term loan will be available to backstop the
funding requirements from our InServ acquisition and that, while
we intend to fund the $202.5 million cash portion of the
purchase price for InServ from the net proceeds of the equity
offering contemplated by this prospectus supplement, we may
borrow under the term loan facility at our option, subject to
certain terms and conditions, to consummate the InServ
acquisition. We expect that the term loan facility will be made
available in a single advance on the closing date of the 2007
Credit Facility and that any unused term loan commitment will be
terminated on that date.
The 2007 Credit Facility contains customary financial covenants
and terms and conditions. For additional information with
respect to the anticipated terms of the 2007 Credit Facility,
see Description of new senior credit facility.
Resolution of
criminal and regulatory matters
Willbros Group, Inc. (WGI) and its subsidiary,
Willbros International, Inc. (WII), have reached an
agreement in principle with representatives of the United States
Department of Justice (the DOJ), subject to approval
by the DOJ and confirmation by a federal district court, to
settle its previously disclosed investigation into possible
violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the
FCPA). In addition, we have reached an agreement in
principle with the staff of the US Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC), subject to approval by the SEC
and confirmation by a federal district court, to resolve its
previously disclosed investigation of possible violations of the
FCPA and possible violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These investigations stem
primarily from our former operations in Bolivia, Ecuador and
Nigeria. As described more fully below, if accepted by the DOJ
and the SEC and approved by the court, the settlements together
will require us to pay, over approximately three years, a total
of $32.3 million in penalties and disgorgement, plus
post-judgment interest on $7.725 million of that amount. In
addition, WGI and WII will, for a period of approximately three
years, each be subject to Deferred Prosecution Agreements
(DPAs) with the DOJ. Finally, we will be subject to
a permanent injunction barring future violations of certain
provisions of the federal securities laws.
S-9
The terms of the settlement in principle with the DOJ include
the following:
|
|
Ø
|
A twelve-count criminal information will be filed against both
WGI and WII. WGI and WII will each enter into a DPA with the
DOJ. The twelve counts include substantive violations of the
anti-bribery provisions and violations of the books-and-records
provisions of the FCPA. All twelve counts relate to our
operations in Nigeria, Ecuador and Bolivia during the period
from 1996 to 2005.
|
|
Ø
|
Provided WGI and WII fully comply with the DPAs for a period of
approximately three years, the DOJ will not continue the
criminal prosecution against WGI and WII and, at the conclusion
of that time, the DOJ will move to dismiss the criminal
information.
|
|
Ø
|
The DPAs will require, for each of their three-year terms, among
other things, full cooperation with the government; compliance
with all federal criminal law, including but not limited to the
FCPA; and a three year monitor for WGI and its subsidiary
companies, primarily focused on international operations outside
of North America, the costs of which are payable by WGI.
|
|
Ø
|
We will be subject to $22 million in fines related to FCPA
violations. The fines are payable in four equal installments of
$5.5 million, first on signing, and annually for
approximately three years thereafter, with no interest payable
on the unpaid amounts.
|
With respect to the agreement in principle with the staff of the
SEC the terms include the following:
|
|
Ø
|
We will consent to the filing in federal district court of a
complaint by the SEC (the Complaint), without
admitting or denying the allegations in the Complaint, and to
the imposition by the court of a final judgment of permanent
injunction against us. The Complaint will allege civil
violations of the antifraud provisions of the Securities Act and
the Securities Exchange Act, the FCPAs anti-bribery
provisions, and the reporting, books-and-records and internal
control provisions of the Securities Exchange Act. The final
judgment will not take effect until it is confirmed by the
court, and will permanently enjoin us from future violations of
those provisions.
|
|
Ø
|
The final judgment will order us to pay $10.3 million,
consisting of $8.9 million for disgorgement of profits and
approximately $1.4 million of pre-judgment interest. The
disgorgement and pre-judgment interest is payable in four equal
installments of $2.575 million, first on signing, and
annually for approximately three years thereafter. Post-judgment
interest will be payable on the outstanding balance.
|
Failure by us to comply with the terms and conditions of either
proposed settlement could result in resumed prosecution and
other regulatory sanctions.
The settlements in principle are contingent upon the
parties agreement to the terms of final settlement
agreements, approval by the DOJ and the SEC and confirmation of
each settlement by a federal district court. There can be no
assurance that the settlements will be finalized.
As a result of the settlements in principle, we have increased
our reserves related to these investigations by
$8.3 million, bringing the aggregate reserves for these
matters to $32.3 million. The increased reserve was
recorded in the third quarter of 2007. The aggregate reserves
reflect our estimate of the expected probable loss with respect
to these matters, assuming the settlements are finalized. If the
settlements are not finalized, the amount reserved may not
reflect eventual losses.
If final settlements with the DOJ and the SEC are not approved,
our liquidity position and financial results could be materially
adversely affected. For a further discussion of the risks
associated with the settlements in principle with the SEC and
the DOJ, see the Risk factor entitled We have reached
agreements in principle to settle investigations involving
possible violations of the FCPA and possible violations of the
Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
If a final settlement is not approved, our liquidity position
and financial results could be materially adversely
affected. and related Risk factors.
S-10
Possible
restructuring with a new Delaware public parent
We are considering forming a new Delaware corporation to be our
new public parent in order to better reflect the current and
anticipated future composition of our business. Such a
restructuring transaction may only be effected with the approval
of our stockholders. We anticipate that any such transaction
would be undertaken in the first quarter of 2008.
OUR EXECUTIVE
OFFICES
We are incorporated in the Republic of Panama and maintain our
headquarters at Plaza 2000 Building, 50th Street,
8th Floor,
P.O. Box 0816-01098,
Panama, Republic of Panama; our telephone number is
+50-7-213-0947. Administrative services are provided to us by
our subsidiary, Willbros USA, Inc., whose administrative
headquarters are located at 4400 Post Oak Parkway,
Suite 1000, Houston, Texas 77027, and whose telephone
number is
(713) 403-8000.
We maintain an internet website at www.willbros.com. We have not
incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement or the
accompanying prospectus the information in, or that can be
accessed through, our website, and you should not consider it to
be a part of this prospectus supplement or the accompanying
prospectus.
S-11
|
|
|
Common stock we are offering |
|
6,875,000 shares |
|
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering |
|
36,006,831 shares |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We estimate that the net proceeds to us from this offering after
expenses will be approximately $249.2 million, or
approximately $286.9 million if the underwriters exercise
their over-allotment option in full, assuming a public offering
price of $38.27 per share. We plan to use approximately
$202.5 million of the net proceeds from this offering to
fund the cash portion of the purchase price for our pending
acquisition of InServ. We intend to use the remaining net
proceeds from this offering to fund our capital expenditures and
working capital requirements to support our growing backlog and
to fund possible acquisitions of additional assets and
businesses which would complement our capabilities. See
Use of proceeds. |
|
New York Stock Exchange symbol |
|
WG |
The number of shares of our common stock outstanding after this
offering is based on approximately 29,131,831 shares
outstanding as of September 30, 2007 and excludes:
|
|
Ø
|
686,750 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise
of options outstanding as of September 30, 2007, at a
weighted average exercise price of $13.69 per share, of which
options to purchase 512,583 shares were exercisable as of
that date at a weighted average exercise price of $12.22 per
share;
|
|
Ø
|
558,354 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise
of warrants outstanding as of September 30, 2007, at the
current exercise price of $19.03 per share, all of which
warrants were exercisable as of that date;
|
|
Ø
|
1,825,589 shares of our common stock issuable upon
conversion of approximately $32.1 million in aggregate
principal amount of our 6.5% Convertible Senior Notes due
2012 (the 6.5% Notes), and
3,595,277 shares of our common stock issuable upon
conversion of $70.0 million in aggregate principal amount
of our 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2024 (the
2.75% Notes), each at the respective conversion
price currently in effect;
|
|
Ø
|
458,798 shares of our common stock available for future
grant under the Willbros Group, Inc. 1996 Stock Plan (the
1996 Stock Plan) and the 2006 Director
Restricted Stock Plan as of September 30, 2007; and
|
|
Ø
|
1,031,250 shares of our common stock that may be purchased
by the underwriters to cover over-allotments, if any.
|
Unless we specifically state otherwise, the information in this
prospectus supplement assumes that the underwriters do not
exercise their option to purchase up to 1,031,250 additional
shares of our common stock to cover over-allotments, if any.
S-12
Summary
historical and pro forma consolidated financial data
The following summary historical consolidated financial data for
the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 are
derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The
following summary historical consolidated financial data as of
September 30, 2007 and for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006 are derived from our unaudited
interim condensed consolidated financial statements. In the
opinion of our management, the unaudited consolidated financial
statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited
consolidated financial statements and include all adjustments
necessary for a fair presentation of the information set forth
therein. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of full
year results.
The following summary unaudited pro forma financial data for the
twelve months ended December 31, 2006 and for and as of the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 give effect to
(1) our pending acquisition of InServ, (2) the
issuance of common stock to the sellers of InServ in connection
with such pending acquisition, (3) the application of
$202.5 million of the net proceeds of this offering to
finance the cash portion of the purchase price of InServ and
(4) the receipt of the remaining net proceeds of this
offering. The following summary unaudited pro forma financial
data does not give effect to an anticipated $1.5 million
charge for unamortized deferred finance costs and a reduction in
annual expense of a minimum of $2.0 million which we
anticipate from the refinancing of our existing credit facility.
The summary unaudited pro forma financial information is based
on our historical consolidated financial statements and the
historical consolidated financial statements of InServ and
includes, in the opinion of management, all adjustments
necessary for a fair presentation of the information set forth
therein. The pro forma adjustments are based on information and
assumptions we believe are reasonable. The unaudited pro forma
financial information is presented for informational purposes
only and does not purport to represent what our results of
operations or financial position would have been had the
transactions reflected occurred on the dates indicated or to
project our financial position as of any future date or our
results of operations for any future period.
This information is only a summary and should be read together
with Unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
statements, Managements discussion and
analysis of financial condition and results of operations,
our historical consolidated financial statements and the related
notes contained elsewhere in this prospectus supplement and the
other information contained in or incorporated by reference in
this prospectus supplement. For more details on how you can
obtain our SEC reports incorporated by reference in this
prospectus supplement, see Where You Can Find More
Information in the accompanying prospectus.
S-13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro
forma
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months
ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
Statement
of operations data
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(in thousands,
except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
272,794
|
|
|
$
|
294,479
|
|
|
$
|
543,259
|
|
|
$
|
352,181
|
|
|
$
|
610,168
|
|
|
$
|
743,742
|
|
|
$
|
863,935
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract cost
|
|
|
222,357
|
|
|
|
266,072
|
|
|
|
489,494
|
|
|
|
320,628
|
|
|
|
538,790
|
|
|
|
654,375
|
|
|
|
752,826
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,776
|
|
|
|
11,688
|
|
|
|
12,430
|
|
|
|
9,180
|
|
|
|
13,223
|
|
|
|
17,940
|
|
|
|
17,278
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
32,525
|
|
|
|
42,350
|
|
|
|
53,366
|
|
|
|
33,133
|
|
|
|
42,295
|
|
|
|
70,001
|
|
|
|
58,893
|
|
Government fines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264,658
|
|
|
|
320,110
|
|
|
|
555,290
|
|
|
|
362,941
|
|
|
|
616,308
|
|
|
|
742,316
|
|
|
|
850,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
8,136
|
|
|
|
(25,631
|
)
|
|
|
(12,031
|
)
|
|
|
(10,760
|
)
|
|
|
(6,140
|
)
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
|
|
12,938
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
1,577
|
|
|
|
1,803
|
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
|
|
4,433
|
|
|
|
1,803
|
|
|
|
4,450
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(3,348
|
)
|
|
|
(5,481
|
)
|
|
|
(10,068
|
)
|
|
|
(7,482
|
)
|
|
|
(6,552
|
)
|
|
|
(10,824
|
)
|
|
|
(6,930
|
)
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,019
|
)
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
(1,970
|
)
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,867
|
)
|
|
|
(3,162
|
)
|
|
|
(7,696
|
)
|
|
|
(6,027
|
)
|
|
|
(19,513
|
)
|
|
|
(8,371
|
)
|
|
|
(19,825
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
5,269
|
|
|
|
(28,793
|
)
|
|
|
(19,727
|
)
|
|
|
(16,787
|
)
|
|
|
(25,653
|
)
|
|
|
(6,945
|
)
|
|
|
(6,887
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
(1,027
|
)
|
|
|
1,668
|
|
|
|
2,308
|
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
7,793
|
|
|
|
7,421
|
|
|
|
15,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
6,296
|
|
|
|
(30,461
|
)
|
|
|
(22,035
|
)
|
|
|
(18,598
|
)
|
|
|
(33,446
|
)
|
|
|
(14,366
|
)
|
|
|
(22,186
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations net of provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
(27,111
|
)
|
|
|
(8,319
|
)
|
|
|
(83,402
|
)
|
|
|
(46,249
|
)
|
|
|
(21,494
|
)
|
|
|
(83,402
|
)
|
|
|
(21,494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(20,815
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38,780
|
)
|
|
$
|
(105,437
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64,847
|
)
|
|
$
|
(54,940
|
)
|
|
$
|
(97,768
|
)
|
|
$
|
(43,680
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
(1.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.98
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.87
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.64
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(1.29
|
)
|
|
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
|
(3.72
|
)
|
|
|
(2.15
|
)
|
|
|
(0.78
|
)
|
|
|
(2.78
|
)
|
|
|
(0.62
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(0.99
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.70
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares of common stock used in computing basic
and diluted net loss per share
|
|
|
20,922,022
|
|
|
|
21,258,211
|
|
|
|
22,440,742
|
|
|
|
21,480,730
|
|
|
|
27,421,927
|
|
|
|
29,953,217
|
|
|
|
34,934,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Balance
sheet data
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro
forma
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
|
|
$
|
58,709
|
|
|
$
|
107,130
|
|
Net working
capital(1)
|
|
|
122,286
|
|
|
|
193,478
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
139,372
|
|
|
|
145,298
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
106,458
|
|
|
|
378,188
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net working capital represents current assets less current
liabilities, including the assets and liabilities of
discontinued operations. |
S-15
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
In addition to the other information included and incorporated
by reference in this prospectus supplement and accompanying
prospectus, you should carefully consider the risks described
below before purchasing our common stock. If any of the
following risks actually occurs, our business, results of
operations and financial condition will likely suffer. As a
result, the trading price of our common stock may decline, and
you might lose part or all of your investment.
These are not the only risks and uncertainties we face.
Additional risks and uncertainties that we are presently unaware
of or currently consider immaterial may also adversely affect
our business, results of operations and financial condition.
RISKS RELATED TO
OUR BUSINESS
We may continue
to experience losses associated with our prior activities in
Nigeria.
In February 2007, we completed the sale of our Nigerian
operations. In August 2007, we and our subsidiary, Willbros
International Services (Nigeria) Limited, entered into a Global
Settlement Agreement with Ascot Offshore Nigeria Limited
(Ascot), the purchaser of our Nigerian operations
and Berkeley Group Plc, the purchasers parent company.
Among the other matters, the Global Settlement Agreement
provided for the payment of an amount in full and final
settlement of all disputes between Ascot and us related to the
working capital adjustment to the closing purchase price under
the February 2007 share purchase agreement. In connection
with the sale or our Nigerian operations, we also entered into a
transition services agreement, and Ascot delivered a promissory
note in favor of us.
The Global Settlement Agreement provided for a settlement in the
amount of $25.0 million, the amount by which we and Ascot
agreed to adjust the closing purchase price downward in respect
of working capital (the Settlement Amount). Under
the Global Settlement Agreement, we retained approximately
$13.9 million of the Settlement Amount and credited this
amount to the account of Ascot for amounts which were due to us
under the transition services agreement and promissory note. Our
payment of the balance of the Settlement Amount settled any and
all obligations and disputes between Ascot and us in relation to
the adjustment to the closing purchase price under the share
purchase agreement.
As part consideration for the parties agreement on the
Settlement Amount, Ascot secured with non-Nigerian banks
supplemental backstop letters of credit totaling approximately
$20.3 million. In addition, upon the payment of the balance
of the Settlement Amount, all of the parties respective
rights and obligations under the indemnification provisions of
the share purchase agreement were terminated, except as provided
in the Global Settlement Agreement.
We may continue to experience losses or incur expenses
subsequent to the sale and disposition of our operations and the
Global Settlement Agreement. In particular:
|
|
Ø |
We issued parent company guarantees to our former clients in
connection with the performance of our Nigeria contracts.
Although the buyer will now be responsible for completing these
projects, in varying degrees our guarantees will remain in force
until the projects are completed. Indemnities are in place
pursuant to which the buyer and its parent company are obligated
to indemnify us for any losses we incur on these guarantees.
However, we can provide no assurance that we will be successful
in enforcing our indemnity rights against the buyer. The
guarantees include five projects under which we estimate that,
at December 31, 2006, there was aggregate remaining
contract revenue of approximately $374.8 million, and
aggregate cost to complete of approximately $316.0 million.
At December 31, 2006, we estimated that only one of the
contracts covered by the guarantees was in a loss position and
have accrued for such loss in the amount of approximately
$33.2 million on our December 31, 2006 balance sheet.
Although we believe Ascots provision of supplemental
backstop
|
S-16
Risk
factors
|
|
|
letters of credit has minimized our letter of credit risk, the
same difficulties which led to our leaving Nigeria continue to
exist. Ascots continued willingness and ability to perform
our former projects in West Africa are important ingredients to
further reducing our risk profile in Nigeria and elsewhere in
West Africa. As such, it was important under the Global
Settlement Agreement to receive additional assurances from Ascot
related to ongoing projects because of our continuing parent
guarantees on those projects. To date, no claims have been made
against our parent guarantees. If we are required to resume
operations in Nigeria under one or more of our performance
guarantees, and are unable to enforce our rights under the
indemnity agreement, we may experience losses. Those losses
could exceed the amount accrued at December 31, 2006,
including losses that we could incur in completing projects that
were not considered to be in a loss position as of
December 31, 2006 due to additional expenses associated
with the
start-up and
redeployment of our equipment or personnel or a further
deterioration of the already challenging operating environment
in Nigeria.
|
|
|
Ø
|
Although our current activities in Nigeria are confined to
providing transition services to the new owner, we may find it
difficult to provide those services to the buyer if we
experience high levels of employee turnover or for other
reasons. If we are unable to provide adequate transition
services or if the buyer is otherwise unable to perform under
our contracts that were in effect as of the closing date, we may
be required to perform under our parent company guarantees
discussed above.
|
|
Ø
|
We may experience difficulty redeploying certain equipment to
our continuing operations that we previously leased for our
Nigeria projects and that was not conveyed to the buyer at
closing.
|
We have reached
agreements in principle with the DOJ and the SEC to settle
investigations involving possible violations of the FCPA and
possible violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If a final settlement is not
approved, our liquidity position and financial results could be
materially adversely affected.
In late December 2004, we learned that tax authorities in
Bolivia had charged our Bolivian subsidiary with failure to pay
taxes owed, filing improper tax returns and the falsification of
tax documents. As a result of our investigation, we determined
that J. Kenneth Tillery, then President of WII and the
individual principally responsible at that time for our
international operations outside of the United States and
Canada, was aware of the circumstances that led to the Bolivian
charges. Mr. Tillery resigned from the Company on
January 6, 2005. In January 2005, our Audit Committee
engaged independent outside legal counsel for the purpose of
conducting an investigation into the circumstances surrounding
the Bolivian tax assessment as well as other activities which
were previously under the control of Mr. Tillery. The
investigations conducted by the Audit Committee and senior
management have revealed information indicating that
Mr. Tillery, and others who directly or indirectly reported
to him, engaged in activities that were and are specifically
contrary to established Company policies and possibly the laws
of several countries, including the United States. Our
investigations determined that some of the actions of
Mr. Tillery and other employees or consultants of WII or
its subsidiaries may have caused us to violate
US securities laws, including the FCPA,
and/or other
US and foreign laws.
We have voluntarily reported the results of our investigations
to both the SEC and the DOJ. We have also voluntarily reported
certain potentially improper facilitation and export activities
to the United States Department of Treasurys Office of
Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), and to the DOJ and to
the SEC. The SEC and the DOJ are each conducting their own
investigations of actions taken by us and our employees and
representatives that may constitute violations of US law.
We are cooperating fully with all such investigations.
We have reached agreements in principle to settle the DOJ and
the SEC investigations. As a result of the agreements in
principle, we have established aggregate reserves relating to
these matters of
S-17
Risk
factors
$32.3 million. The aggregate reserves reflect our estimate
of the expected probable loss with respect to these matters,
assuming the settlement is finalized. Of the $32.3 million
in aggregate reserves, $22.0 million, representing the
anticipated DOJ fines, was recorded as an operating expense for
continuing operations and $10.3 million, representing
anticipated SEC disgorgement of profits and pre-judgment
interest, was recorded as an operating expense for discontinued
operations.
These settlements in principle are contingent upon the
parties agreement to the terms of final settlement
agreements and require final approval from the DOJ and the SEC
and confirmation by a federal district court. We can provide no
assurance that such approvals will be obtained. If a final
resolution is not concluded, we believe it is probable that the
DOJ and SEC will seek civil and criminal sanctions against us as
well as fines, penalties and disgorgement. If ultimately
imposed, or if agreed to by settlement, such sanctions may
exceed the current amount we have estimated and reserved in
connection with the settlements in principle.
In addition, with respect to OFACs investigation, OFAC and
Willbros USA, Inc. have agreed in principle to settle the
allegations pursuant to which we will pay a total of $6,600 as a
civil penalty.
The terms of
final settlements with the DOJ and SEC may negatively impact our
ongoing operations.
Upon completion of final settlements with the DOJ and SEC, we
expect to be subject to ongoing review and regulation of our
business operations, including the review of our operations and
compliance program by a government approved independent monitor.
The activities of the independent monitor will have a cost to us
and may cause a change in our processes and operations, the
outcome of which we are unable to predict. In addition, the
settlements may impact our operations or result in legal actions
against us in countries that are the subject of the settlements.
The settlements could also result in third-party claims against
us, which may include claims for special, indirect, derivative
or consequential damages.
Our failure to
comply with the terms of settlement agreements with the DOJ and
SEC would have a negative impact on our ongoing
operations.
Under the settlements in principle with the DOJ and SEC, we
expect to be subject to a three-year deferred prosecution
agreement and to be permanently enjoined by the federal district
court against any future violations of the federal securities
laws. Our failure to comply with the terms of the settlement
agreements with the DOJ and SEC could result in resumed
prosecution and other regulatory sanctions and could otherwise
negatively affect our operations. In addition, if we fail to
make timely payment of the penalty amounts due to the DOJ and/or
the disgorgement amounts specified in the SEC settlement, the
DOJ and/or
the SEC will have the right to accelerate payment, and demand
that the entire balance due be paid immediately. Our ability to
comply with the terms of the settlements is dependent on the
success of our ongoing compliance program, including:
|
|
Ø
|
our supervision, training and retention of competent employees;
|
|
Ø
|
the efforts of our employees to comply with applicable law and
our Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Compliance Manual and Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics; and
|
|
Ø
|
our continuing management of our agents and business partners.
|
Special risks
associated with doing business in highly corrupt environments
may adversely affect our business.
Although we have completed the sale of our operations in
Nigeria, our international business operations may continue to
include projects in countries where corruption is prevalent.
Since the anti-bribery
S-18
Risk
factors
restrictions of the FCPA make it illegal for us to give anything
of value to foreign officials in order to obtain or retain any
business or other advantage, we may be subject to competitive
disadvantages to the extent that our competitors are able to
secure business, licenses or other preferential treatment by
making payments to government officials and others in positions
of influence.
Our management
has concluded that we did not maintain effective internal
controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004. We believe that the material weaknesses reported
as of December 31, 2006 were eliminated in February 2007 as
a result of the sale of our Nigerian assets and operations.
However, our inability to remediate these material weaknesses
prior to February 2007, or any control deficiencies that we may
discover in the future, could adversely affect our ability to
report our financial condition and results of operations
accurately and on a timely basis. As a result, our business,
operating results and liquidity could be harmed.
As disclosed in our annual reports on
Form 10-K
for 2006, 2005 and 2004, managements assessment of our
internal controls over financial reporting identified several
material weaknesses. These material weaknesses led to the
restatement of our previously issued consolidated financial
statements for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 and the first three
quarters of 2004. Although we made progress in executing our
remediation plans during 2005 and 2006, including the
remediation of three material weaknesses, as of
December 31, 2006, management concluded that we did not
maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting
due to the following remaining material weaknesses in internal
controls:
|
|
Ø
|
Nigeria accounting: During the fourth quarter of 2006, we
determined that a material weakness in our internal controls
over financial reporting existed related to the Companys
management control environment over the accounting for our
Nigeria operations. This weakness in management control led to
the inability to adequately perform various control functions
including supervision over and consistency of inventory
management, petty cash disbursements, accounts payable
disbursement approvals, account reconciliations, and review of
timekeeping records. This material weakness resulted primarily
from our inability to maintain a consistent and stable internal
control environment over our Nigeria operations in the fourth
quarter of 2006.
|
|
Ø
|
Nigeria project controlsestimate to complete: A material
weakness existed related to controls over the Nigeria project
reporting. This weakness existed throughout 2006 and is a
continuation of a material weakness reported in our 2005
Form 10-K.
The weakness primarily impacted one large Nigeria project with a
total contract value of approximately $165 million, for
which cost estimates were not updated timely in the fourth
quarter of 2006 due to insufficient measures being taken to
independently verify and update reliable cost estimates. This
material weakness specifically resulted in material changes to
revenue and cost of sales during the preparation of our year-end
financial statements by our accounting staff prior to their
issuance.
|
In 2006, our efforts to strengthen our control environment and
correct the material weakness in company level controls over the
financial statement close process included:
|
|
Ø
|
reviewing and monitoring our accounting department structure and
organization, both in terms of size and expertise;
|
|
Ø
|
hiring additional senior accounting personnel at our corporate
administrative offices;
|
|
Ø
|
increasing our supervision of accounting personnel;
|
|
Ø
|
recruiting candidates in order to expeditiously fill vacancies
in our accounting, finance and project management
functions; and
|
|
Ø
|
developing documentation and consistent execution of controls
over our financial statement close process.
|
S-19
Risk
factors
Our efforts during 2006 to improve our control environment in
response to the weakness in construction contract management
identified at December 31, 2005 included:
|
|
Ø
|
initiating efforts to expand operations and accounting
supervisory controls over consistency in the project reporting
process and documentation for Nigeria contracts through the
addition of supervisory personnel; and
|
|
Ø
|
developing more standardized documentation related to project
management reporting and management review processes.
|
We believe that our remaining material weaknesses were
eliminated in February 2007 upon the sale of our Nigeria assets
and operations since those material weaknesses related solely to
our operations in that country. However, our inability to
remediate these material weaknesses prior to February 2007, and
any other control deficiencies we identify in the future, could
adversely affect our ability to report our financial results on
a timely and accurate basis, which could result in a loss of
investor confidence in our financial reports or have a material
adverse effect on our ability to operate our business or access
sources of liquidity. Furthermore, because of the inherent
limitations of any system of internal control over financial
reporting, including the possibility of human error, the
circumvention or overriding of controls and fraud, even
effective internal controls may not prevent or detect all
misstatements.
Our business is
highly dependent upon the level of capital expenditures by oil,
gas and power companies on infrastructure.
Our revenue and cash flow are primarily dependent upon major
engineering and construction projects. The availability of these
types of projects is dependent upon the economic condition of
the oil, gas and power industries, specifically, the level of
capital expenditures of oil, gas and power companies on
infrastructure. Our failure to obtain major projects, the delay
in awards of major projects, the cancellation of major projects
or delays in completion of contracts are factors that could
result in the under-utilization of our resources, which would
have an adverse impact on our revenue and cash flow. There are
numerous factors beyond our control that influence the level of
capital expenditures of oil, gas and power companies, including:
|
|
Ø
|
current and projected oil, gas and power prices;
|
|
Ø
|
the demand for electricity;
|
|
Ø
|
the abilities of oil, gas and power companies to generate,
access and deploy capital;
|
|
Ø
|
exploration, production and transportation costs;
|
|
Ø
|
the discovery rate of new oil and gas reserves;
|
|
Ø
|
the sale and expiration dates of oil and gas leases and
concessions;
|
|
Ø
|
regulatory restraints on the rates that power companies may
charge their customers;
|
|
Ø
|
local and international political and economic conditions;
|
|
Ø
|
the ability or willingness of host country government entities
to fund their budgetary commitments; and
|
|
Ø
|
technological advances.
|
If we are not
able to renegotiate our surety bond lines, our ability to
operate may be significantly restricted.
Our bonding company provides surety bonds on a
case-by-case
basis for projects in North America and requires that we post
backstop letters of credit. We are currently negotiating with
our bonding company to eliminate the requirement to provide
backstop letters of credit, but we can provide no assurance that
S-20
Risk
factors
we will be successful in removing this requirement. If we are
unable to obtain surety bonds, or if the cost of obtaining
surety bonds is prohibitive, our ability to bid some projects
may be adversely affected in the event other forms of
performance guarantees such as letters of credit or parent
guarantees are deemed insufficient or unacceptable. In addition,
the requirement that we post backstop letters of credit reduces
the capacity available to us under our credit facility.
Our international
operations are subject to political and economic risks of
developing countries.
Although we recently sold our operations in Nigeria and
Venezuela, we have substantial operations in the Middle East
(Oman) and anticipate that a significant portion of our contract
revenue will be derived from, and a significant portion of our
long-lived assets will be located in, developing countries.
Conducting operations in developing countries presents
significant commercial challenges for our business. A disruption
of activities, or loss of use of equipment or installations, at
any location in which we have significant assets or operations,
could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition
and results of operations. Accordingly, we are subject to risks
that ordinarily would not be expected to exist to the same
extent in the United States, Canada, Japan or Western Europe.
Some of these risks include:
|
|
Ø
|
civil uprisings, riots and war, which can make it impractical to
continue operations, adversely affect both budgets and schedules
and expose us to losses;
|
|
Ø
|
repatriating foreign currency received in excess of local
currency requirements and converting it into dollars or other
fungible currency;
|
|
Ø
|
exchange rate fluctuations, which can reduce the purchasing
power of local currencies and cause our costs to exceed our
budget, reducing our operating margin in the affected country;
|
|
Ø
|
expropriation of assets, by either a recognized or unrecognized
foreign government, which can disrupt our business activities
and create delays and corresponding losses;
|
|
Ø
|
availability of suitable personnel and equipment, which can be
affected by government policy, or changes in policy, which limit
the importation of skilled craftsmen or specialized equipment in
areas where local resources are insufficient;
|
|
Ø
|
government instability, which can cause investment in capital
projects by our potential customers to be withdrawn or delayed,
reducing or eliminating the viability of some markets for our
services;
|
|
Ø
|
decrees, laws, regulations, interpretations and court decisions
under legal systems, which are not always fully developed and
which may be retroactively applied and cause us to incur
unanticipated
and/or
unrecoverable costs as well as delays which may result in real
or opportunity costs; and
|
|
Ø
|
terrorist attacks such as those which occurred on
September 11, 2001 in the United States, which could impact
insurance rates, insurance coverages and the level of economic
activity, and produce instability in financial markets.
|
Our operations in developing countries may be adversely affected
in the event any governmental agencies in these countries
interpret laws, regulations or court decisions in a manner which
might be considered inconsistent or inequitable in the United
States, Canada, Japan or Western Europe. We may be subject to
unanticipated taxes, including income taxes, excise duties,
import taxes, export taxes, sales taxes or other governmental
assessments which could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations for any quarter or year.
These risks may result in a material adverse effect on our
results of operations.
S-21
Risk
factors
We may be
adversely affected by a concentration of business in a
particular country.
Due to a limited number of major projects worldwide, we expect
to have a substantial portion of our resources dedicated to
projects located in a few countries. Therefore, our results of
operations are susceptible to adverse events beyond our control
that may occur in a particular country in which our business may
be concentrated at that time. Economic downturns in such
countries could also have an adverse impact on our operations.
Our backlog is
subject to unexpected adjustments and cancellations and is,
therefore, an uncertain indicator of our future
earnings.
We cannot guarantee that the revenue projected in our backlog
will be realized or profitable. Projects may remain in our
backlog for an extended period of time. In addition, project
cancellations or scope adjustments may occur, from time to time,
with respect to contracts reflected in our backlog and could
reduce the dollar amount of our backlog and the revenue and
profits that we actually earn. Many of our contracts have
termination for convenience provisions in them in some cases,
without any provision for penalties or lost profits. Therefore,
project terminations, suspensions or scope adjustments may occur
from time to time with respect to contracts in our backlog.
Finally, poor project or contract performance could also impact
our backlog and profits.
Our failure to
recover adequately on claims against project owners for payment
could have a material adverse effect on us.
We occasionally bring claims against project owners for
additional costs exceeding the contract price or for amounts not
included in the original contract price. These types of claims
occur due to matters such as owner-caused delays or changes from
the initial project scope, which result in additional costs,
both direct and indirect. Often, these claims can be the subject
of lengthy arbitration or litigation proceedings, and it is
often difficult to accurately predict when these claims will be
fully resolved. When these types of events occur and unresolved
claims are pending, we may invest significant working capital in
projects to cover cost overruns pending the resolution of the
relevant claims. A failure to promptly recover on these types of
claims could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity and
financial condition.
Our business is
dependent on a limited number of key clients.
We operate primarily in the oil, gas and power industries,
providing construction, engineering and facilities development
and operations services to a limited number of clients. Much of
our success depends on developing and maintaining relationships
with our major clients and obtaining a share of contracts from
these clients. The loss of any of our major clients could have a
material adverse effect on our operations. Our three largest
clients were responsible for 51.6 percent of our backlog at
September 30, 2007.
Our use of
fixed-price contracts could adversely affect our operating
results.
A substantial portion of our projects is currently performed on
a fixed-price basis. Under a fixed-price contract, we agree on
the price that we will receive for the entire project, based
upon a defined scope, which includes specific assumptions and
project criteria. If our estimates of our own costs to complete
the project are below the actual costs that we may incur, our
margins will decrease, and we may incur a loss. The revenue,
cost and gross profit realized on a fixed-price contract will
often vary from the estimated amounts because of unforeseen
conditions or changes in job conditions and variations in labor
and equipment productivity over the term of the contract. If we
are unsuccessful in mitigating these risks, we may realize gross
profits that are different from those originally estimated and
incur
S-22
Risk
factors
reduced profitability or losses on projects. Depending on the
size of a project, these variations from estimated contract
performance could have a significant effect on our operating
results for any quarter or year. In general, turnkey contracts
to be performed on a fixed-price basis involve an increased risk
of significant variations. This is a result of the long-term
nature of these contracts and the inherent difficulties in
estimating costs and of the interrelationship of the integrated
services to be provided under these contracts, whereby
unanticipated costs or delays in performing part of the contract
can have compounding effects by increasing costs of performing
other parts of the contract.
Percentage-of-completion
method of accounting for contract revenue may result in material
adjustments that would adversely affect our operating
results.
We recognize contract revenue using the percentage-of-completion
method on long-term fixed price contracts. Under this method,
estimated contract revenue is accrued based generally on the
percentage that costs to date bear to total estimated costs,
taking into consideration physical completion. Estimated
contract losses are recognized in full when determined.
Accordingly, contract revenue and total cost estimates are
reviewed and revised periodically as the work progresses and as
change orders are approved, and adjustments based upon the
percentage-of-completion are reflected in contract revenue in
the period when these estimates are revised. These estimates are
based on managements reasonable assumptions and our
historical experience, and are only estimates. Variation of
actual results from these assumptions or our historical
experience could be material. To the extent that these
adjustments result in an increase, a reduction or an elimination
of previously reported contract revenue, we would recognize a
credit or a charge against current earnings, which could be
material.
Terrorist attacks
and war or risk of war may adversely affect our results of
operations, our ability to raise capital or secure insurance, or
our future growth.
The continued threat of terrorism and the impact of military and
other action, including US military operations in Iraq,
will likely lead to continued volatility in prices for crude oil
and natural gas and could affect the markets for our operations.
In addition, future acts of terrorism could be directed against
companies operating both outside and inside the United States.
Further, the US government has issued public warnings that
indicate that pipelines and other energy assets might be
specific targets of terrorist organizations. These developments
have subjected our operations to increased risks and, depending
on their ultimate magnitude, could have a material adverse
effect on our business.
Our operations
are subject to a number of operational risks.
Our business operations include pipeline construction,
fabrication, pipeline rehabilitation services and the operation
of heavy equipment. These operations involve a high degree of
operational risk. Natural disasters, adverse weather conditions,
collisions and operator error could cause personal injury or
loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property,
equipment and the environment, and suspension of operations. In
locations where we perform work with equipment that is owned by
others, our continued use of the equipment can be subject to
unexpected or arbitrary interruption or termination. The
occurrence of any of these events could result in work stoppage,
loss of revenue, casualty loss, increased costs and significant
liability to third parties.
The insurance protection we maintain may not be sufficient or
effective under all circumstances or against all hazards to
which we may be subject. An enforceable claim for which we are
not fully insured could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, we may
not be able to maintain adequate insurance in the future at
rates that we consider reasonable.
S-23
Risk
factors
We may become
liable for the obligations of our joint ventures and our
subcontractors.
Some of our projects are performed through joint ventures with
other parties. In addition to the usual liability of contractors
for the completion of contracts and the warranty of our work,
where work is performed through a joint venture, we also have
potential liability for the work performed by our joint
ventures. In these projects, even if we satisfactorily complete
our project responsibilities within budget, we may incur
additional unforeseen costs due to the failure of our joint
ventures to perform or complete work in accordance with contract
specifications.
We act as prime contractor on a majority of the construction
projects we undertake. In our capacity as prime contractor and
when acting as a subcontractor, we perform most of the work on
our projects with our own resources and typically subcontract
only such specialized activities as hazardous waste removal,
nondestructive inspection, tank erection, catering and security.
However, with respect to EPC and other contracts, we may choose
to subcontract a substantial portion of the project. In the
construction industry, the prime contractor is normally
responsible for the performance of the entire contract,
including subcontract work. Thus, when acting as a prime
contractor, we are subject to the risk associated with the
failure of one or more subcontractors to perform as anticipated.
Governmental
regulations could adversely affect our business.
Many aspects of our operations are subject to governmental
regulations in the countries in which we operate, including
those relating to currency conversion and repatriation, taxation
of our earnings and earnings of our personnel, the increasing
requirement in some countries to make greater use of local
employees and suppliers, including, in some jurisdictions,
mandates that provide for greater local participation in the
ownership and control of certain local business assets. In
addition, we depend on the demand for our services from the oil,
gas and power industries, and, therefore, our business is
affected by changing taxes, price controls, and laws and
regulations relating to the oil, gas and power industries
generally. The adoption of laws and regulations by the countries
or the states in which we operate that are intended to curtail
exploration and development drilling for oil and gas or the
development of power generation facilities for economic and
other policy reasons, could adversely affect our operations by
limiting demand for our services.
Our operations are also subject to the risk of changes in laws
and policies which may impose restrictions on our business,
including trade restrictions, which could have a material
adverse effect on our operations. Other types of governmental
regulation which could, if enacted or implemented, adversely
affect our operations include:
|
|
Ø
|
expropriation or nationalization decrees;
|
|
Ø
|
confiscatory tax systems;
|
|
Ø
|
primary or secondary boycotts directed at specific countries or
companies;
|
|
Ø
|
embargoes;
|
|
Ø
|
extensive import restrictions or other trade barriers;
|
|
Ø
|
mandatory sourcing and local participation rules;
|
|
Ø
|
oil, gas or power price regulation; and
|
|
Ø
|
unrealistically high labor rate and fuel price regulation.
|
Our future operations and earnings may be adversely affected by
new legislation, new regulations or changes in, or new
interpretations of, existing regulations, and the impact of
these changes could be material.
S-24
Risk
factors
Our strategic
plan relies in part on acquisitions to sustain our growth.
Acquisitions of other companies present certain risks and
uncertainties.
Our strategic plan involves growth through, among other things,
the acquisition of other companies. Such growth involves a
number of risks, including:
|
|
Ø
|
inherent difficulties relating to combining previously separate
businesses;
|
|
Ø
|
diversion of managements attention from ongoing day-to-day
operations;
|
|
Ø
|
the assumption of liabilities of an acquired business, including
both foreseen and unforeseen liabilities;
|
|
Ø
|
failure to realize anticipated benefits, such as cost savings
and revenue enhancements;
|
|
Ø
|
potentially substantial transaction costs associated with
business combinations;
|
|
Ø
|
difficulties relating to assimilating the personnel, services
and systems of an acquired business and to integrating
marketing, contracting, commercial and other operational
disciplines; and
|
|
Ø
|
difficulties in applying and integrating our system of internal
controls to an acquired business.
|
In addition, we cannot assure you that we will continue to
locate suitable acquisition targets or that we will be able to
consummate any such transactions on terms and conditions
acceptable to us. Acquisitions may bring us into businesses we
have not previously conducted and expose us to additional
business risks that are different than those we have
traditionally experienced.
Our operations
expose us to potential environmental liabilities.
Our US operations are subject to numerous environmental
protection laws and regulations which are complex and stringent.
We regularly perform work in and around sensitive environmental
areas, such as rivers, lakes and wetlands. Significant fines and
penalties may be imposed for non-compliance with environmental
laws and regulations, and some environmental laws provide for
joint and several strict liability for remediation of releases
of hazardous substances, rendering a person liable for
environmental damage, without regard to negligence or fault on
the part of such person. In addition to potential liabilities
that may be incurred in satisfying these requirements, we may be
subject to claims alleging personal injury or property damage as
a result of alleged exposure to hazardous substances. These laws
and regulations may expose us to liability arising out of the
conduct of operations or conditions caused by others, or for our
acts which were in compliance with all applicable laws at the
time these acts were performed.
We own and operate several properties in the United States that
have been used for a number of years for the storage and
maintenance of equipment and upon which hydrocarbons or other
wastes may have been disposed or released. Any release of
substances by us or by third parties who previously operated on
these properties may be subject to the Comprehensive
Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act
(CERCLA), the Resource Compensation and Recovery Act
(RCRA), and analogous state laws. CERCLA imposes
joint and several liability, without regard to fault or the
legality of the original conduct, on certain classes of persons
who are considered to be responsible for the release of
hazardous substances into the environment, while RCRA governs
the generation, storage, transfer and disposal of hazardous
wastes. Under such laws, we could be required to remove or
remediate previously disposed wastes and clean up contaminated
property. This could have a significant impact on our future
results.
Our operations outside of the United States are oftentimes
potentially subject to similar governmental controls and
restrictions relating to the environment.
S-25
Risk
factors
Our ability to
increase our revenues and operating profits is partly dependent
on our ability to secure additional specialized pipeline
construction equipment, either through lease or purchase. The
availability of such equipment in the current market is highly
limited.
Due to the substantial increase in investment in energy-related
infrastructure, particularly hydrocarbon transportation, our
industry is currently experiencing shortages in the availability
of certain specialized equipment essential to the construction
of large diameter pipelines. We expect that these shortages will
persist or even worsen. If we are unsuccessful in obtaining
essential construction equipment on reasonable terms, our growth
may be curtailed.
Our industry is
highly competitive, which could impede our growth.
We operate in a highly competitive environment. A substantial
number of the major projects that we pursue are awarded based on
bid proposals. We compete for these projects against
government-owned or supported companies and other companies that
have substantially greater financial and other resources than we
do. In some markets, there is competition from national and
regional firms against which we may not be able to compete on
price. Our growth may be impacted to the extent that we are
unable to successfully bid against these companies.
Our operating
results could be adversely affected if our
non-US
operations became taxable in the United States.
If any income earned, currently or historically, by Willbros
Group, Inc. or its
non-US subsidiaries
from operations outside the United States constituted income
effectively connected with a US trade or business, and as a
result became taxable in the United States, our consolidated
operating results could be materially and adversely affected.
We are dependent
upon the services of our executive management.
Our success depends heavily on the continued services of our
executive management. Our management team is the nexus of our
operational experience and customer relationships. Our ability
to manage business risk and satisfy the expectations of our
clients, stockholders and other stakeholders is dependent upon
the collective experience and relationships of our management
team. In addition, we do not maintain key man life insurance for
these individuals. The loss or interruption of services provided
by one or more of our senior officers could adversely affect our
results of operations.
It may be
difficult to enforce judgments which are predicated on the
federal securities laws of the United States against
us.
We are a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of
Panama. In addition, one of our current board members is a
resident of Canada. Accordingly:
|
|
Ø
|
it may not be possible to effect service of process on
non-resident directors in the United States and to enforce
judgments against them predicated on the civil liability
provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States;
|
|
Ø
|
because a substantial amount of our assets are located outside
the United States, any judgment obtained against us in the
United States may not be fully collectible in the United
States; and
|
|
Ø
|
we have been advised that courts in the Republic of Panama will
not enforce liabilities in original actions predicated solely on
the US federal securities laws.
|
These factors mean that it may be more costly and difficult for
you to recover fully any alleged damages that you may claim to
have suffered due to alleged violations of US federal
securities laws by us or our management than it would otherwise
be in the case of a US corporation.
S-26
Risk
factors
Our goodwill may
become impaired.
We expect to have a substantial amount of goodwill following the
completion of our pending acquisition of InServ. At least
annually, we evaluate our goodwill for impairment based on the
fair value of each operating unit. This estimated fair value
could change if there were future changes in our capital
structure, cost of debt, interest rates, capital expenditure
levels or ability to perform at levels that were forecasted.
These changes could result in an impairment that would require a
material non-cash charge to our results of operations.
RISKS RELATED TO
OUR COMMON STOCK
Our common stock,
which is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, has from time to
time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations.
These fluctuations are likely to continue in the future, and you
may not be able to resell your shares of common stock at or
above the purchase price paid by you.
The market price of our common stock may change significantly in
response to various factors and events beyond our control,
including the following:
|
|
Ø
|
the risk factors described in this prospectus supplement;
|
|
Ø
|
a shortfall in operating revenue or net income from that
expected by securities analysts and investors;
|
|
Ø
|
changes in securities analysts estimates of our financial
performance or the financial performance of our competitors or
companies in our industry generally;
|
|
Ø
|
general conditions in our customers industries; and
|
|
Ø
|
general conditions in the securities markets.
|
Our stockholder
rights plan, articles of incorporation and by-laws may inhibit a
takeover, which may adversely affect the performance of our
stock.
Our stockholder rights plan and provisions of our articles of
incorporation and by-laws may discourage unsolicited takeover
proposals or make it more difficult for a third party to acquire
us, which may adversely affect the price that investors might be
willing to pay for our common stock. For example, our articles
of incorporation and by-laws:
|
|
Ø
|
provide for restrictions on the transfer of any shares of common
stock to prevent us from becoming a controlled foreign
corporation under US tax law;
|
|
Ø
|
provide for a classified board of directors, which allows only
one-third of our directors to be elected each year;
|
|
Ø
|
restrict the ability of stockholders to take action by written
consent;
|
|
Ø
|
establish advance notice requirements for nominations for
election to our Board of Directors; and
|
|
Ø
|
authorize our Board of Directors to designate the terms of and
issue new series of preferred stock.
|
We also have a stockholder rights plan which gives holders of
our common stock the right to purchase additional shares of our
capital stock if a potential acquirer purchases or announces a
tender or exchange offer to purchase 15 percent or more of
our outstanding common stock. The rights issued under the
stockholder rights plan would cause substantial dilution to a
person or group that attempts to acquire us on terms not
approved in advance by our Board of Directors.
S-27
Risk
factors
Future sales of
our common stock may depress our stock price.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in
the public market or otherwise, either by us, a member of
management or a major stockholder, or the perception that these
sales could occur, may depress the market price of our common
stock and impair our ability to raise capital through the sale
of additional equity securities.
In the event we
issue stock as consideration for certain acquisitions, we may
dilute share ownership.
We grow our business organically as well as through
acquisitions. One method of acquiring companies or otherwise
funding our corporate activities is through the issuance of
additional equity securities. If we do issue additional equity
securities, such issuances may have the effect of diluting our
earnings per share as well as our existing stockholders
individual ownership percentages in our company.
Our prior sale of
common stock, warrants and convertible notes, and our
outstanding warrants and convertible notes may lead to further
dilution of our issued and outstanding stock.
In October 2006, we sold 3,722,360 shares of our common
stock and warrants to purchase an additional
558,354 shares. The recent issuance of warrants and the
prior issuance of $70.0 million in aggregate principal
amount of our 2.75% Notes and $84.5 million of our
6.5% Notes may cause a significant increase in the number
of shares of common stock currently outstanding. In May 2007, we
induced the conversion of approximately $52.5 million in
aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 6.5% Notes into a
total of 2,987,582 shares of our common stock and may elect
to enter into similar transactions in the future. If we agree to
induce the conversion of additional convertible notes, we may
cause a significant additional increase in the number of shares
of common stock currently outstanding.
In August 2006, our stockholders approved an increase in our
authorized shares of common stock from 35 million to
70 million shares. The issuance of additional common stock
or securities convertible into our common stock would result in
further dilution of the ownership interest in us held by
existing stockholders. We are authorized to issue, without
stockholder approval, one million shares of Class A
preferred stock, which may give other stockholders dividend,
conversion, voting and liquidation rights, among other rights,
which may be superior to the rights of holders of our common
stock. Our Board of Directors has no present intention of
issuing any such Class A preferred stock, but reserves the
right to do so in the future.
S-28
Special
note regarding forward-looking statements
This prospectus supplement and accompanying prospectus,
including the documents that we incorporate by reference,
contain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended. All statements, other than statements of
historical facts, included or incorporated by reference in this
prospectus supplement and accompanying prospectus that address
activities, events or developments which we expect or anticipate
will or may occur in the future, including such things as future
capital expenditures (including the amount and nature thereof),
oil, gas, gas liquids and power prices, demand for our services,
the amount and nature of future investments by governments,
expansion and other development trends of the oil, gas and power
industries, business strategy, expansion and growth of our
business and operations, the outcome of government
investigations and legal proceedings and other such matters are
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are
based on assumptions and analyses we made in light of our
experience and our perception of historical trends, current
conditions and expected future developments as well as other
factors we believe are appropriate under the circumstances.
However, whether actual results and developments will conform to
our expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks
and uncertainties. As a result, actual results could differ
materially from our expectations. Factors that could cause
actual results to differ from those contemplated by our
forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the
following:
|
|
Ø
|
difficulties we may encounter in connection with the recently
completed sale and disposition of our Nigeria assets and Nigeria
based operations, including without limitation, obtaining
indemnification for any losses we may experience if claims are
made against any corporate guarantees we provided and which
remained in place subsequent to the closing;
|
|
Ø
|
the consequences we may encounter if our settlements in
principle with the DOJ and the SEC are finalized, including the
imposition of civil or criminal fines, penalties, disgorgement
of profits, monitoring arrangements, or other sanctions that
might be imposed as a result of government investigations;
|
|
Ø
|
the consequences we may encounter if our settlements in
principle with the DOJ and the SEC are not finalized, including
the loss of eligibility to bid for and obtain
U.S. government contracts, and other civil and criminal
sanctions which may exceed the current amount we have estimated
and reserved in connection with the settlements in principle;
|
|
Ø
|
the commencement by foreign governmental authorities of
investigations into the actions of our current and former
employees, and the determination that such actions constituted
violations of foreign law;
|
|
Ø
|
the dishonesty of employees
and/or other
representatives or their refusal to abide by applicable laws and
our established policies and rules;
|
|
Ø
|
adverse weather conditions not anticipated in bids and estimates;
|
|
Ø
|
project cost overruns, unforeseen schedule delays, and the
application of liquidated damages;
|
|
Ø
|
cancellation of projects, in whole or in part;
|
|
Ø
|
failing to realize cost recoveries from projects completed or in
progress within a reasonable period after completion of the
relevant project;
|
|
Ø
|
inability to hire and retain sufficient skilled labor to execute
our current work, our work in backlog and future work we have
not yet been awarded;
|
|
Ø
|
inability to execute cost-reimbursable projects within the
target cost, thus eroding contract margin but not contract
income on the project;
|
|
Ø
|
curtailment of capital expenditures in the oil, gas and power
industries;
|
S-29
Forward-looking
statements
|
|
Ø
|
political or social circumstances impeding the progress of our
work and increasing the cost of performance;
|
|
Ø
|
failure to obtain the timely award of one or more projects;
|
|
Ø
|
inability to identify and acquire suitable acquisition targets
on reasonable terms;
|
|
Ø
|
inability to obtain adequate financing;
|
|
Ø
|
inability to obtain sufficient surety bonds or letters of credit;
|
|
Ø
|
loss of the services of key management personnel;
|
|
Ø
|
the demand for energy moderating or diminishing;
|
|
Ø
|
downturns in general economic, market or business conditions in
our target markets;
|
|
Ø
|
changes in the effective tax rate in countries where our work
will be performed;
|
|
Ø
|
changes in applicable laws or regulations, or changed
interpretations thereof;
|
|
Ø
|
changes in the scope of our expected insurance coverage;
|
|
Ø
|
inability to manage insurable risk at an affordable cost;
|
|
Ø
|
the occurrence of the risk factors listed elsewhere or
incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement and
accompanying prospectus; and
|
|
Ø
|
other factors, most of which are beyond our control.
|
Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made or
incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement and
accompanying prospectus are qualified by these cautionary
statements and there can be no assurance that the actual results
or developments we anticipate will be realized or, even if
substantially realized, that they will have the consequences
for, or effects on, our business or operations that we
anticipate today. Accordingly, you should not unduly rely on
these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the
date of this prospectus supplement. We undertake no obligation
to publicly revise any forward-looking statement to reflect
circumstances or events after the date of this prospectus
supplement or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
You should, however, review the factors and risks we describe in
the reports we file from time to time with the SEC. See
Where You Can Find More Information in the
accompanying prospectus.
S-30
We estimate that the net proceeds to us from the sale of the
6,875,000 shares of common stock we are offering will be
approximately $249.2 million, assuming a public offering
price of $38.27 per share and after deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions and the estimated offering expenses
payable by us. If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment
option in full, we estimate the net proceeds to us will be
approximately $286.9 million.
We plan to use approximately $202.5 million of the net
proceeds from this offering to fund the cash portion of the
purchase price for our pending acquisition of InServ. See
Pending acquisition. We will use the remainder of
the net proceeds to fund our capital expenditures and working
capital requirements to support our growing backlog and to fund
additional possible acquisitions of assets and businesses which
would complement our capabilities.
Pending any ultimate use of any portion of the proceeds from
this offering, we intend to invest the proceeds in a variety of
capital preservation investments, including short-term,
interest-bearing instruments such as US government securities
and municipal bonds.
S-31
The following table sets forth, as of September 30, 2007:
|
|
Ø
|
in the Actual column, our cash, cash equivalents, short-term
investments and capitalization; and
|
|
Ø
|
in the Pro forma column, our cash, cash equivalents, short-term
investments and capitalization on an adjusted basis to give
effect to, in addition to the effects of the acquisition of
InServ for $225 million, of which $202.5 million will
be paid in cash and the balance paid in Willbros Group, Inc.
common stock, the receipt by us of an additional
$46.7 million in net proceeds of this offering in excess of
the proceeds used to fund the InServ acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro
forma
|
|
|
|
(in thousands,
except per share data)
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
|
|
$
|
58,709
|
|
|
$
|
107,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
139,372
|
|
|
|
145,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.05 par value per share; 70 million
shares authorized; 29,131,831 shares issued and
outstanding, actual; 36,644,306 shares issued and
outstanding, as adjusted
|
|
|
1,467
|
|
|
|
1,843
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
273,840
|
|
|
|
545,194
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(181,912
|
)
|
|
|
(181,912
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
15,730
|
|
|
|
15,730
|
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
(2,667
|
)
|
|
|
(2,667
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
106,458
|
|
|
|
378,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
245,830
|
|
|
$
|
523,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table above should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and related notes included in
this prospectus supplement. This table excludes:
|
|
Ø
|
686,750 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise
of options outstanding as of September 30, 2007, at a
weighted average exercise price of $13.69 per share, of which
options to purchase 512,583 shares were exercisable as of
that date at a weighted average exercise price of $12.22 per
share;
|
|
Ø
|
558,354 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise
of warrants outstanding as of September 30, 2007, at the
current exercise price of $19.03 per share, all of which
warrants were exercisable as of that date;
|
|
Ø
|
1,825,589 shares of our common stock issuable upon
conversion of approximately $32.1 million in aggregate
principal amount of our 6.5% Notes, and
3,595,277 shares of our common stock issuable upon
conversion of $70.0 million in aggregate principal amount
of our 2.75% Notes, each at the respective conversion price
currently in effect;
|
|
Ø
|
458,798 shares of our common stock available for future
grant under the 1996 Stock Plan and the 2006 Director
Restricted Stock Plan as of September 30, 2007; and
|
|
Ø
|
1,031,250 shares of our common stock that may be purchased
by the underwriters to cover over-allotments, if any.
|
S-32
Price
range of common stock
Our common stock is traded publicly on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol WG. The following table
presents quarterly information on the price range of our common
stock. This information indicates the high and low sales prices
reported by the New York Stock Exchange.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
24.52
|
|
|
$
|
18.68
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
20.66
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
17.80
|
|
|
|
14.14
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
17.73
|
|
|
|
14.13
|
|
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
21.23
|
|
|
$
|
14.46
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
24.53
|
|
|
|
17.38
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
19.47
|
|
|
|
15.00
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
19.93
|
|
|
|
14.00
|
|
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
23.13
|
|
|
$
|
17.81
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
30.63
|
|
|
|
21.86
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
34.48
|
|
|
|
22.96
|
|
Fourth quarter (through October 31, 2007)
|
|
|
38.33
|
|
|
|
32.30
|
|
Substantially all of our stockholders maintain their shares in
street name accounts and are not, individually,
stockholders of record. As of September 30, 2007, our
common stock was held by 91 holders of record and an
estimated 7,000 to 8,000 beneficial owners. On
October 31, 2007, the last sale price reported on the New
York Stock Exchange for our common stock was $38.27 per share.
S-33
Since 1991, we have not paid any cash dividends on our capital
stock, except dividends in 1996 on our outstanding shares of
preferred stock, which were converted into shares of common
stock on July 15, 1996. We anticipate that we will retain
earnings to support operations and to finance the growth and
development of our business. Therefore, we do not expect to pay
cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Our 2007 Credit
Facility prohibits us from paying cash dividends on our common
stock.
S-34
If you invest in our common stock, you will experience dilution
to the extent of the difference between the public offering
price per share you pay in this offering and the net tangible
book value per share of our common stock immediately after this
offering. Our net tangible book value as of September 30,
2007 was approximately $93.3 million, or $3.20 per share of
common stock. Net tangible book value per share is equal to our
total tangible assets minus total liabilities, all divided by
the number of shares of common stock outstanding as of
September 30, 2007. After giving effect to the sale of the
6,875,000 shares of common stock we are offering at an
assumed public offering price of $38.27 per share, and after
deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and our
estimated offering expenses, our as adjusted net tangible book
value would be approximately $342.5 million, or
approximately $9.51 per share of common stock. This represents
an immediate increase in net tangible book value of
approximately $6.31 per share to existing stockholders and an
immediate dilution of approximately $28.76 per share to new
investors. The following table illustrates this calculation on a
per share basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed public offering price per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
38.27
|
|
Net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
3.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase per share attributable to the offering
|
|
|
6.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per share to new investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
28.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in
full, as adjusted net tangible book value would increase to
approximately $10.26 per share, representing an increase to
existing stockholders of approximately $7.06 per share, and
there would be an immediate dilution of approximately $28.01 per
share to new investors.
The number of shares of common stock outstanding used for
existing stockholders in the table and calculations above is
based on shares outstanding as of September 30, 2007 and
excludes:
|
|
Ø
|
686,750 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise
of options outstanding as of September 30, 2007, at a
weighted average exercise price of $13.69 per share, of which
options to purchase 512,583 shares were exercisable as of
that date at a weighted average exercise price of $12.22 per
share;
|
|
Ø
|
558,354 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise
of warrants outstanding as of September 30, 2007, at the
current exercise price of $19.03 per share, all of which
warrants were exercisable as of that date;
|
|
Ø
|
1,825,589 shares of our common stock issuable upon
conversion of approximately $32.1 million in aggregate
principal amount of our 6.5% Notes, and
3,595,277 shares of our common stock issuable upon
conversion of $70.0 million in aggregate principal amount
of our 2.75% Notes, each at the respective conversion price
currently in effect; and
|
|
Ø
|
458,798 shares of our common stock available for future
grant under the 1996 Stock Plan and the 2006 Director
Restricted Stock Plan as of September 30, 2007.
|
The exercise of outstanding options and warrants and the
conversion of convertible notes having an exercise price less
than the public offering price will increase dilution to new
investors.
S-35
OVERVIEW
On October 31, 2007, our subsidiary, Willbros USA, Inc.,
entered into a definitive agreement for the purchase of all the
issued and outstanding equity interests of InServ, an Oklahoma
limited liability company. Headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma,
InServ is a fully integrated solutions provider of turnaround,
maintenance and capital projects for the hydrocarbon processing
and petrochemical industries. InServs core competencies
include:
|
|
Ø
|
providing turnkey project services through program management
and EPC project services;
|
|
Ø
|
overhauling fluid catalytic cracking units, the main gasoline
producing unit in a refinery, which run continuously for three
to five years between shutdowns;
|
|
Ø
|
overhauling process units, installing refractory, specialty
welding and piping projects and erecting or modifying process
heaters in the plants;
|
|
Ø
|
building, modifying or repairing oil storage tanks, typically
located at pipeline terminals and refineries; and
|
|
Ø
|
manufacturing process heaters, heater coils, alloy piping,
specialty components and other equipment for installation in oil
refineries.
|
In addition, InServ provides several secondary lines of
services, including safety services, safety personnel and
equipment for projects. InServ primarily serves the downstream
petroleum industry, including major integrated oil companies,
independent refineries and marketers, marketing and pipeline
terminals and petrochemical companies. InServ also provides
services to select EPC firms, independent power producers,
specialty process facilities and ammonia and fertilizer
manufacturing plants and facilities.
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 and the first
nine months of 2007, InServ generated revenues of
$200.5 million and $253.7 million, respectively.
InServs backlog at December 31, 2006 and
September 30, 2007 was $158.3 million and
$210.5 million, respectively.
InServ is organized into the following business units:
|
|
Ø
|
Construction services;
|
|
Ø
|
Field services;
|
|
Ø
|
Manufacturing services;
|
|
Ø
|
Turnkey project services;
|
|
Ø
|
Tank services;
|
|
Ø
|
Construction & turnaround services;
|
|
Ø
|
Construction tank services;
|
|
Ø
|
Heater services; and
|
|
Ø
|
Safety services.
|
The Construction & turnaround services and
Construction tank services units pursue union projects on a
nationwide basis. The remaining units are non-union.
PROPERTIES AND
FACILITIES
InServ owns its two primary manufacturing facilities, the
Catoosa Plant and the Mohawk Plant, both located in Tulsa,
Oklahoma, with excellent access to road, rail, air and river
barge transportation. The
S-36
Pending
acquisition
Catoosa Plant is located on 30 acres with a production area
of approximately 60,000 square feet. The Mohawk Plant has
become one of the largest fabricators of refinery heater and
furnace components in the world. The Mohawk Plant rests on over
70 acres in Tulsa, Oklahoma and has a total of
approximately 130,000 square feet of manufacturing space in
five buildings. InServ also leases office space in Houston,
Texas and office, manufacturing, warehouse and shop space in
Deer Park, Texas and Adrian, Michigan.
MANAGEMENT
The purchase agreement provides that InServs founder,
President and CEO, Arlo DeKraai, will report to our President
and CEO, Robert R. Harl, and will be nominated to serve as a
member of our Board of Directors. Mr. DeKraai has been
Chairman, President and CEO of InServ since 1994 when he founded
the company as Cust-O-Fab Service Co. Mr. DeKraai oversees
and actively manages InServs business, property and
operations. Mr. DeKraai has 37 years of experience in
the field and previously served as founder and President and CEO
of Midwest Industrial Contractors, Inc., President of
Construction and Turnaround Services, Inc., Project Manager for
Refractory Construction and Project Engineer for Texaco. He
graduated from South Dakota State University with a degree in
Civil Engineering.
We anticipate that certain members of InServs current
management team will enter into employment agreements with
InServ upon the consummation of the transactions contemplated by
the purchase agreement. It is anticipated that Arlo DeKraai,
InServs current President and CEO, will enter into such an
agreement and that the following other members of InServs
current management team will enter into such agreements: Clayton
Hughes, Richard Shimer, Terry Stewart, David Mathews, James
Lefler, Alan Black, Richard McDaniel, Jerry Schivally and Steven
Rohman. Each employment agreement, as currently negotiated, is
for a term of three years, stipulates that each employee shall
be engaged as a full time employee of InServ and allows for the
employees participation (pursuant to various terms and
conditions) in our management incentive plan and the 1996 Stock
Plan. Each employment agreement also contains traditional
non-competition and non-disclosure provisions.
ACQUISITION
TERMS
The consideration for our purchase of all of the equity
interests of InServ will be $225.0 million, consisting of
$202.5 million payable in cash at closing and
637,475 shares of Willbros Group, Inc. common stock having
a value of $22.5 million (determined by the average closing
price of Willbros Group, Inc. common stock over the 20 trading
days ending on the second trading day before the execution of
the definitive agreement). The cash portion of the closing price
will be subject to a post-closing adjustment to account for any
change in InServs working capital from a predetermined
target to InServs actual working capital on the closing
date. A total of $20.0 million of the cash portion of the
purchase price will be placed into escrow for a period of
18 months and released from escrow in one-third increments
on each of the six-month,
12-month and
18-month
anniversaries of the closing date. The escrowed cash will secure
performance of the sellers obligations under the
definitive agreement, including working capital adjustments and
indemnification obligations for breaches of the sellers
representations, warranties and covenants included in the
definitive agreement.
RELATED PARTY
RELATIONSHIPS
In early 2007, InServ retained Growth Capital Partners, L.P., an
investment banking firm, to assist InServ with the possible sale
of the company. John T. McNabb, II, our Chairman of the
Board of Directors, is the founder and Chairman of the Board of
Directors of Growth Capital Partners, which will receive a
customary fee from InServ in the event that InServ is sold.
Mr. McNabb and Robert R. Harl, our President and CEO and
one of our directors, served on the InServ Board of Directors
from
S-37
Pending
acquisition
March 28, 2005 until September 18, 2007 and
August 5, 2005 until September 18, 2007, respectively.
Messrs. McNabb and Harl resigned from the Board of
Directors of InServ prior to the commencement of discussions
between us and InServ with respect to our possible acquisition
of InServ and Mr. McNabb has recused himself from providing
any further advice to InServ as a principal of Growth Capital
Partners. Messrs McNabb and Harl each own 3,000 shares of
InServ, or less than 0.4 percent of the outstanding equity
interests of InServ. We formed a special committee of the Board
of Directors, consisting of all of the independent directors
other than Mr. McNabb, to consider, evaluate and approve
our acquisition of InServ. In addition, the special committee
has obtained an opinion dated October 30, 2007, from a
nationally recognized investment banking and valuation firm,
that the consideration to be paid by us in the proposed
acquisition is fair from a financial point of view to us.
ACQUISITION
RATIONALE
Complementary service offerings. The
addition of InServ will add new service lines to our business,
many of which are sold to the current customers of Willbros. As
a result, we will be able to offer existing Willbros and InServ
clients a more complete range of services. For example, the tank
services and EPC offerings of InServ are complementary to the
service offerings of Willbros and afford growth opportunities in
both the midstream and downstream sectors. In addition,
InServs downstream focus adds further diversification. A
majority of InServs revenue is generated from maintenance,
repair and overhaul projects that are necessary for the
continuous and safe operation of the many processing units of a
refinery. We believe that increased diversification could help
mitigate the effect of spending cycles in the pipeline industry.
We also believe there may be opportunities for growth through
selective and strategic acquisitions of businesses or assets
complementary to InServs current service offering.
Expand geographic reach. InServ has an
excellent reach across the United States, having provided
services to 60 of the 149 operable refineries in the country.
Its broad geographic reach is attractive to customers and
provides the company with the ability to rapidly mobilize
people, materials and equipment. We believe that an expanded
geographic reach from the InServ acquisition will position
Willbros to achieve incremental revenue opportunities.
Willbros strong position in the Canadian oil sands
provides InServ access to this rapidly growing refining market.
We expect that the maintenance market for these processing
facilities will provide a significant opportunity following the
Cdn$100 billion of facility capital investment which is
expected to occur by 2015.
Consistent and conservative financial management with
contract terms and conditions focused on risk-adjusted
return. InServ has demonstrated consistent
top- and bottom-line growth, while maintaining a balance sheet
with minimal debt. Over 75 percent of InServs backlog
is cost reimbursable with a significant weighting toward
maintenance, repair and overhaul activities. We believe that
InServs conservative approach to operating their business
will be complementary to Willbros.
Long-term customer relationships with significant
overlap. InServ has a premier brand name and
reputation among the worlds largest refining and
petrochemical operators. InServ serves a blue-chip customer
base, most with repeat business over many years with some
relationships extending over 30 years. Several of these
customers are also existing customers of Willbros. We believe
that these quality relationships will be complementary to
Willbros existing customer base, enabling the combined
entity to enhance revenue opportunities across a broad base of
service offerings.
Strong cultural fit. Willbros
management has an established relationship with the management
of InServ that we believe will facilitate the integration
process. We believe that InServs high cultural similarity
with Willbros, coupled with a customer base which is well known
to us and lack of services overlap, make it an excellent
opportunity to expand our market and provide a recurring revenue
stream.
S-38
Unaudited
pro forma condensed combined financial statements
Willbros Group, Inc.
(in thousands, except per share data)
The following unaudited pro forma combined financial data give
effect to (1) our pending acquisition of InServ,
(2) the issuance of common stock to the sellers of InServ
in connection with such pending acquisition, (3) the
application of $202.5 million of the net proceeds of this
offering to finance the cash portion of the purchase price of
InServ and (4) the receipt of the remaining net proceeds of
this offering. The following summary unaudited pro forma
financial data does not give effect to an anticipated
$1.5 million charge for unamortized deferred finance costs
and a reduction in annual expense of a minimum of
$2.0 million which we anticipate from the refinancing of
our existing credit facility.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
have been prepared assuming the acquisition of InServ by
Willbros Group, Inc. is accounted for as a purchase under US
generally accepted accounting principles, and are based on the
historical consolidated financial statements of each company
which include, in the opinion of management of both companies,
all adjustments necessary to present fairly the results as of
and for such periods. However, the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial statements do not give consideration to the
impact, if any, of asset dispositions or cost savings that may
result from the acquisition. The following unaudited pro forma
condensed combined balance sheet at September 30, 2007, and
unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and the year
ended December 31, 2006 should be read in conjunction with
the historical financial statements of Willbros Group, Inc. and
the related notes included in this prospectus supplement. The
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements were
prepared as if the acquisition occurred as of or at the
beginning of each fiscal year presented. There are no
significant adjustments required to the historical financial
data to conform the accounting policies of the two companies.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
are presented for informational purposes only and do not purport
to be indicative of results of operations or financial position
that would have occurred had the transaction been consummated at
the beginning of the period presented, nor are they necessarily
indicative of future results.
The purchase price of $225,000 will be paid by a cash
consideration of $202,500, funded from the proceeds from a stock
offering, and the issuance of shares of common stock directly to
the sellers valued at $22,500.
Preliminary allocation of the purchase price follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
37,519
|
|
Fixed asset
write-up to
fair market value
|
|
|
4,927
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Estimated transaction costs
|
|
|
(1,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
61,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The excess of purchase price over the net assets acquired of
$163,754 is included in goodwill. Willbros Group, Inc. is in the
process of obtaining a third party valuation of certain tangible
and intangible assets. The actual values and estimated useful
lives assigned to the acquisition will be subject to future
refinement. Because a full valuation of those assets and
liabilities and related useful lives has not yet been finalized,
the final allocation of the purchase price may differ from the
allocation presented above. Any goodwill amount recognized as a
result of this acquisition will be reviewed for impairment
annually. Any purchase price allocated to identifiable
intangible assets with a finite life will be amortized over the
estimate useful life of the asset.
S-39
Unaudited pro
forma condensed combined balance sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2007
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Willbros
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Pro
forma
|
|
|
Pro
forma
|
|
(in thousands,
except per share data)
|
|
Group,
Inc.
|
|
|
LLC
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
combined
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
58,709
|
|
|
$
|
2,891
|
|
|
$
|
45,530
|
(B)
|
|
$
|
107,130
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
181,733
|
|
|
|
49,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,750
|
|
Cost in excess of billing
|
|
|
29,029
|
|
|
|
18,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,913
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
23,753
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
293,224
|
|
|
|
71,992
|
|
|
|
45,530
|
|
|
|
410,746
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
120,393
|
|
|
|
11,682
|
|
|
|
4,927
|
(A)
|
|
|
137,002
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
13,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,927
|
)(A)
|
|
|
176,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,481
|
(B)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
(C)
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
(G)
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
17,053
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
443,854
|
|
|
$
|
83,849
|
|
|
$
|
234,211
|
|
|
$
|
761,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
11,237
|
|
|
$
|
5,926
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,163
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
134,425
|
|
|
|
31,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,594
|
|
Billings in excess of cost
|
|
|
7,891
|
|
|
|
9,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,126
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
17,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
170,938
|
|
|
|
46,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,268
|
|
2.75% Notes
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
6.5% Notes
|
|
|
32,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,050
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
26,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,085
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
38,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
337,396
|
|
|
|
46,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383,726
|
|
Contingencies and commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,519
|
|
|
|
(37,519
|
)(B)
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
1,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
376
|
(B)
|
|
|
1,843
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
273,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271,354
|
(B)
|
|
|
545,194
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(181,912
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(181,912
|
)
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
(2,667
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,667
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
15,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
106,458
|
|
|
|
37,519
|
|
|
|
234,211
|
|
|
|
378,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
443,854
|
|
|
$
|
83,849
|
|
|
$
|
234,211
|
|
|
$
|
761,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
S-40
Unaudited pro
forma condensed combined statement of operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Willbros
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
(in thousands,
except per share data)
|
|
Group,
Inc.
|
|
|
LLC
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
combined
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenues
|
|
$
|
610,168
|
|
|
$
|
253,767
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
863,935
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
538,790
|
|
|
|
214,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
752,826
|
|
Depreciations and amortization
|
|
|
13,223
|
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
3,251
|
(D)
|
|
|
17,278
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
42,295
|
|
|
|
16,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,893
|
|
Government fines
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
616,308
|
|
|
|
231,438
|
|
|
|
3,251
|
|
|
|
850,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(6,140
|
)
|
|
|
22,329
|
|
|
|
(3,251
|
)
|
|
|
12,938
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
4,433
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,450
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(6,552
|
)
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,930
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(2,019
|
)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,970
|
)
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(15,375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,513
|
)
|
|
|
(312
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,825
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(25,653
|
)
|
|
|
22,017
|
|
|
|
(3,251
|
)
|
|
|
(6,887
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
7,793
|
|
|
|
|
(F)
|
|
|
7,506
|
(E)
|
|
|
15,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(33,446
|
)
|
|
$
|
22,017
|
|
|
$
|
(10,757
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,186
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(1.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
27,421,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,512,475
|
|
|
|
34,934,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
27,421,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,512,475
|
|
|
|
34,934,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
S-41
Unaudited pro
forma condensed combined statement of operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Willbros
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
(in thousands,
except per share data)
|
|
Group,
Inc.
|
|
|
LLC
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
combined
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenues
|
|
$
|
543,259
|
|
|
$
|
200,483
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
743,742
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
489,494
|
|
|
|
164,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
654,375
|
|
Depreciations and amortization
|
|
|
12,430
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
4,335
|
(D)
|
|
|
17,940
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
53,366
|
|
|
|
16,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,001
|
|
Government fines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
555,290
|
|
|
|
182,691
|
|
|
|
4,335
|
|
|
|
742,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(12,031
|
)
|
|
|
17,792
|
|
|
|
(4,335
|
)
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,803
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(10,068
|
)
|
|
|
(756
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,824
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,696
|
)
|
|
|
(675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,371
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(19,727
|
)
|
|
|
17,117
|
|
|
|
(4,335
|
)
|
|
|
(6,945
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2,308
|
|
|
|
|
(F)
|
|
|
5,113
|
(E)
|
|
|
7,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(22,035
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,117
|
|
|
$
|
(9,448
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,366
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.98
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.98
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
22,440,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,512,475
|
|
|
|
29,953,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
22,440,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,512,475
|
|
|
|
29,953,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
S-42
Unaudited pro
forma condensed combined financial statements
Notes to unaudited
pro forma
condensed combined financial statements
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Based upon preliminary estimates, the transaction is assumed
to result in a
write-up of
InServs fixed assets of $4,927. |
|
(B) |
|
To record the issuance of 6,875,000 shares of Willbros
Group, Inc. common stock, at an assumed market price of $38.27.
The remaining 637,475 shares of common stock will be issued
to the sellers as restricted stock. |
|
(C) |
|
To record the estimated initial transaction costs of $1,200,
representing one-time professional and advisory fees. |
|
(D) |
|
To record the increased depreciation expense associated with
the write up of fixed assets and the amortization associated
with the value of existing customer backlog. Expected useful
lives for building and equipment is 20 years and
5 years, respectively. The estimated useful life of
existing customer backlog is 5 years. |
|
(E) |
|
To record an estimated income tax provision on InServs
pre-tax income, net of the tax benefit for the increased
depreciation expense. |
|
(F) |
|
InServ was a partnership with no income tax provision. |
|
(G) |
|
To record the estimated value of existing customer backlog
value of $20,000 which will be amortized over an estimated
useful life of five years. Willbros Group, Inc. is in the
process of obtaining a third party valuation of intangible
assets. The actual value and estimated useful life assigned to
the customer backlog will be subject to future refinement.
Because a full valuation of the asset and useful life has not
yet been finalized, the final allocation of the purchase price
may differ from the allocation presented herein. |
S-43
Selected
historical and pro forma consolidated financial data
The following table sets forth selected historical consolidated
financial statement information as of and for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, which has been derived
from our unaudited consolidated financial statements, and as of
and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006, 2005,
2004, 2003 and 2002, which has been derived from our audited
consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of our
management, the unaudited consolidated financial statements have
been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated
financial statements and include all adjustments necessary for a
fair presentation of the information set forth therein. Interim
results are not necessarily indicative of full-year results.
The following table also sets forth selected unaudited pro forma
consolidated financial data for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2006 and for and as of the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and give effect to (1) our pending
acquisition of InServ, (2) the issuance of common stock to
the sellers of InServ in connection with such acquisition,
(3) the application $202.5 million of the net proceeds
of this offering to finance the cash portion of the purchase
price of InServ and (4) the receipt of the remaining net
proceeds of this offering. The following summary unaudited pro
forma financial data does not give effect to an anticipated
$1.5 million charge for unamortized deferred finance costs
and a reduction in annual expense of a minimum of
$2.0 million which we anticipate from the refinancing of
our existing credit facility. The unaudited pro forma financial
information is based on our historical consolidated financial
statements and the historical consolidated financial statements
of InServ and includes, in the opinion of management, all
adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the information
set forth therein. The pro forma adjustments are based on
information and assumptions we believe are reasonable. The
unaudited pro forma financial information is presented for
informational purposes only and does not purport to represent
what our results of operations or financial position would have
been had the transactions reflected occurred on the dates
indicated or to project our financial position as of any future
date or our results of operations for any future period.
You should read the information in this table together with
Unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
statements, Managements discussion and
analysis of financial condition and results of operations
and our historical consolidated financial statements and the
related notes contained elsewhere in this prospectus supplement
and the other information contained in the documents
incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement.
S-44
Selected
historical and pro forma consolidated financial data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Pro
forma
|
|
Statement of
operations data
|
|
2002(1)(2)(3)
|
|
|
2003(1)(2)
|
|
|
2004(1)
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Year ended
December
31, 2006
|
|
|
Nine months
ended
September
30, 2007
|
|
|
|
(in thousands,
except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Results of operations data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
462,855
|
|
|
$
|
271,021
|
|
|
$
|
272,794
|
|
|
$
|
294,479
|
|
|
$
|
543,259
|
|
|
$
|
352,181
|
|
|
$
|
610,168
|
|
|
$
|
743,742
|
|
|
$
|
863,935
|
|
Operating expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract cost
|
|
|
391,631
|
|
|
|
250,103
|
|
|
|
222,357
|
|
|
|
266,072
|
|
|
|
489,494
|
|
|
|
320,628
|
|
|
|
538,790
|
|
|
|
654,375
|
|
|
|
752,826
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
11,472
|
|
|
|
9,878
|
|
|
|
9,776
|
|
|
|
11,688
|
|
|
|
12,430
|
|
|
|
9,180
|
|
|
|
13,223
|
|
|
|
17,940
|
|
|
|
17,278
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
26,307
|
|
|
|
28,294
|
|
|
|
32,525
|
|
|
|
42,350
|
|
|
|
53,366
|
|
|
|
33,133
|
|
|
|
42,295
|
|
|
|
70,001
|
|
|
|
58,893
|
|
Government fines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
33,445
|
|
|
|
(17,254
|
)
|
|
|
8,136
|
|
|
|
(25,631
|
)
|
|
|
(12,031
|
)
|
|
|
(10,760
|
)
|
|
|
(6,140
|
)
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
|
|
12,938
|
|
Interest, net
|
|
|
(1,101
|
)
|
|
|
(518
|
)
|
|
|
(2,480
|
)
|
|
|
(3,904
|
)
|
|
|
(8,265
|
)
|
|
|
(6,132
|
)
|
|
|
(2,119
|
)
|
|
|
(9,021
|
)
|
|
|
(2,480
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(470
|
)
|
|
|
(965
|
)
|
|
|
(387
|
)
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
(2,019
|
)
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
(1,970
|
)
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
31,874
|
|
|
|
(18,737
|
)
|
|
|
5,269
|
|
|
|
(28,793
|
)
|
|
|
(19,727
|
)
|
|
|
(16,787
|
)
|
|
|
(25,653
|
)
|
|
|
(6,945
|
)
|
|
|
(6,887
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
2,502
|
|
|
|
(8,726
|
)
|
|
|
(1,027
|
)
|
|
|
1,668
|
|
|
|
2,308
|
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
7,793
|
|
|
|
7,421
|
|
|
|
15,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
29,372
|
|
|
|
(10,011
|
)
|
|
|
6,296
|
|
|
|
(30,461
|
)
|
|
|
(22,035
|
)
|
|
|
(18,598
|
)
|
|
|
(33,446
|
)
|
|
|
(14,366
|
)
|
|
|
(22,186
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations net of provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
(4,466
|
)
|
|
|
(906
|
)
|
|
|
(27,111
|
)
|
|
|
(8,319
|
)
|
|
|
(83,402
|
)
|
|
|
(46,249
|
)
|
|
|
(21,494
|
)
|
|
|
(83,402
|
)
|
|
|
(21,494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
24,906
|
|
|
$
|
(10,917
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,815
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38,780
|
)
|
|
$
|
(105,437
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64,847
|
)
|
|
$
|
(54,940
|
)
|
|
$
|
(97,768
|
)
|
|
$
|
(43,680
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1.61
|
|
|
$
|
(0.49
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
(1.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.98
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.87
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.64
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
(1.29
|
)
|
|
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
|
(3.72
|
)
|
|
|
(2.15
|
)
|
|
|
(0.78
|
)
|
|
|
(2.78
|
)
|
|
|
(0.62
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.99
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.70
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1.57
|
|
|
$
|
(0.49
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
(1.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.98
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.87
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.64
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
(1.29
|
)
|
|
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
|
(3.72
|
)
|
|
|
(2.15
|
)
|
|
|
(0.78
|
)
|
|
|
(2.78
|
)
|
|
|
(0.62
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1.33
|
|
|
$
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.99
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.70
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares of common stock used in computing basic
and diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
18,271
|
(4)
|
|
|
20,662
|
|
|
|
20,922
|
|
|
|
21,258
|
|
|
|
22,441
|
|
|
|
21,481
|
|
|
|
27,422
|
|
|
|
29,953
|
|
|
|
34,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
23,059
|
|
|
$
|
(15,209
|
)
|
|
$
|
37,410
|
|
|
$
|
(37,117
|
)
|
|
$
|
(103,352
|
)
|
|
$
|
(72,302
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,649
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(23,998
|
)
|
|
|
(32,589
|
)
|
|
|
(36,751
|
)
|
|
|
(36,964
|
)
|
|
|
33,373
|
|
|
|
24,245
|
|
|
|
66,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
33,100
|
|
|
|
17,794
|
|
|
|
54,362
|
|
|
|
56,830
|
|
|
|
51,550
|
|
|
|
7,841
|
|
|
|
(28,445
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
(829
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
2,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other data (excluding discontinued operations):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(5)
|
|
$
|
44,447
|
|
|
$
|
(8,341
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,525
|
|
|
$
|
(13,201
|
)
|
|
$
|
968
|
|
|
$
|
(1,475
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions
|
|
$
|
16,144
|
|
|
$
|
9,975
|
|
|
$
|
15,733
|
|
|
$
|
25,111
|
|
|
$
|
12,264
|
|
|
$
|
12,389
|
|
|
$
|
(15,890
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog (at period
end)(6)
|
|
$
|
125,608
|
|
|
$
|
151,074
|
|
|
$
|
73,343
|
|
|
$
|
240,373
|
|
|
$
|
602,272
|
|
|
$
|
763,022
|
|
|
$
|
1,098,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees (at period
end)(7)
|
|
|
3,140
|
|
|
|
1,478
|
|
|
|
1,381
|
|
|
|
2,519
|
|
|
|
4,156
|
|
|
|
3,578
|
|
|
|
4,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
48,348
|
|
|
$
|
18,975
|
|
|
$
|
73,167
|
|
|
$
|
55,933
|
|
|
$
|
37,643
|
|
|
$
|
15,476
|
|
|
$
|
58,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
107,130
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
92,640
|
|
|
|
83,728
|
|
|
|
108,643
|
|
|
|
204,960
|
|
|
|
170,825
|
|
|
|
165,743
|
|
|
|
122,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,478
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
295,035
|
|
|
|
304,694
|
|
|
|
417,110
|
|
|
|
498,885
|
|
|
|
588,254
|
|
|
|
524,596
|
|
|
|
443,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
761,914
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
92,418
|
|
|
|
110,167
|
|
|
|
237,066
|
|
|
|
353,651
|
|
|
|
490,323
|
|
|
|
437,982
|
|
|
|
337,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383,726
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
18,322
|
|
|
|
73,495
|
|
|
|
138,020
|
|
|
|
166,152
|
|
|
|
164,880
|
|
|
|
139,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,298
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
202,617
|
|
|
|
194,527
|
|
|
|
180,044
|
|
|
|
145,234
|
|
|
|
97,931
|
|
|
|
86,614
|
|
|
|
106,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378,188
|
|
S-45
Selected
historical and pro forma consolidated financial data
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These amounts have been changed
retrospectively to reflect the classification of discontinued
operations as filed in the
Form 8-K
on December 12, 2006. |
|
(2)
|
|
These amounts are presented as
restated in the 2004
Form 10-K. |
|
(3)
|
|
We acquired Mt. West Group,
comprised of four companies providing design-build services to
the western U.S. energy industry, on October 23, 2002.
Accordingly, its results of operations since that date are
consolidated with our results of operations. |
|
(4)
|
|
The fully diluted weighted
average number of common shares outstanding was
18,722. |
|
(5)
|
|
EBITDA from continuing
operations represents earnings from continuing operations before
net interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization.
EBITDA from continuing operations is not intended to represent
cash flows for the respective period, nor has it been presented
as an alternative to operating income from continuing operations
as an indicator of operating performance. It should not be
considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of
performance prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP. See our
consolidated statements of cash flows in our consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus
supplement. EBITDA from continuing operations is included
elsewhere in this prospectus supplement because it is one of the
measures through which we assess our financial performance.
EBITDA from continuing operations as presented may not be
comparable to other similarly titled measures used by other
companies. A reconciliation of EBITDA from continuing operations
to GAAP financial information is provided in the table
below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months
ended
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
29,372
|
|
|
$
|
(10,011
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,296
|
|
|
$
|
(30,461
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,035
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,598
|
)
|
|
$
|
(33,446
|
)
|
Interest, net
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
2,480
|
|
|
|
3,904
|
|
|
|
8,265
|
|
|
|
6,132
|
|
|
|
2,119
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
2,502
|
|
|
|
(8,726
|
)
|
|
|
(1,027
|
)
|
|
|
1,668
|
|
|
|
2,308
|
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
7,793
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
11,472
|
|
|
|
9,878
|
|
|
|
9,776
|
|
|
|
11,688
|
|
|
|
12,430
|
|
|
|
9,180
|
|
|
|
13,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
44,447
|
|
|
$
|
(8,341
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,525
|
|
|
$
|
(13,201
|
)
|
|
$
|
968
|
|
|
$
|
(1,475
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
Backlog is anticipated contract
revenue from uncompleted portions of existing contracts and
contracts whose award is reasonably assured. |
|
(7)
|
|
Includes employees of joint
ventures in 2002. |
S-46
Managements
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations
($ in thousands,
except share and per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)
The following discussion of our financial condition and
results of operations should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and the notes to those
financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus
supplement. This discussion contains forward-looking statements
that involve significant risks and uncertainties. As a result of
many factors, such as those set forth under Risk
factors and elsewhere in this prospectus supplement, our
actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in
our forward-looking statements.
We are a provider of services primarily to the high growth
global energy infrastructure market. In particular, we are a
leading service provider to the hydrocarbon pipeline market,
having performed work in 59 countries and constructed over
200,000 kilometers of pipelines, which we believe positions us
in the top tier of pipeline contractors in the world. We offer a
wide range of services to our customers, including engineering,
project management, construction services and specialty
services, such as operations and maintenance, each of which we
offer discretely or in combination as a fully integrated
offering (which we refer to as EPC).
We provide services to our customers through three segments:
Engineering; Construction; and EPC.
MARKET
DEMAND
We believe the fundamentals supporting the demand for
engineering, construction and EPC services for the energy
industry, particularly for pipeline services in North America,
will continue to be strong for the next two to five years. Many
positive developments reinforce our view. Capital spending for
the exploration and production sector of the energy industry is
expected to exceed $310 billion in 2007; this additional
investment is expected to drive new pipeline infrastructure
development. Additionally, based on data from Douglas-Westwood,
an industry consultant, planned onshore pipeline construction
capital investment is estimated to be approximately
$180 billion for the 2008 to 2012 time frame. Forecasted
capital expenditures on new bitumen production and processing
facilities in the oil sands region of western Canada are
expected to exceed Cdn$100 billion through 2015, as
production levels are increased from approximately one million
barrels per day presently to more than three million barrels per
day in 2015. Recent industry articles have highlighted the need
for new, large crude oil export pipelines from Canada to the
United States and to export facilities on the west coast. In the
United States, new gas production in the Rocky Mountain region
has generated plans for gas pipelines to the West Coast, Midwest
and East Coast. In the southwestern United States, pipeline
infrastructure build-out is now underway to link new gas sources
in the Barnett, Woodford and Fayetteville shales to premium
markets in Florida and the Northeast. Liquefied natural gas is
also expected to bring more opportunities to us, both in North
America and in other producing/exporting countries.
The engineering market in North America continues to be capacity
constrained. We are selecting and accepting assignments that
offer higher margins and better contract terms and position us
for EPC assignments. Our engineering operations are currently
operating at full capacity, constrained by the availability of
qualified personnel. We opened our newest engineering office in
Kansas City, Missouri in the second quarter of 2007. Our overall
engineering headcount increased by 128 in 2007, allowing us to
continue to take advantage of the demand for engineering
services. We continue to evaluate several foreign locations to
expand our engineering resource base. We believe the high level
of engineering activity is a precursor to higher levels of
construction activity in North America.
North Americas demand for our services is demonstrated by
our near-record backlog at September 30, 2007 of
$1,098,884, which has grown 82.5 percent from our $602,272
backlog reported at December 31, 2006. More importantly,
the composition of our backlog has moved to predominantly
S-47
Managements
discussion and analysis
(75 percent) cost-reimbursable contracts, which are lower
risk contracts. At December 31, 2006, cost-reimbursable
contracts in backlog were only 45 percent of our total
backlog. We have now replaced the entire backlog from Nigeria
with lower risk backlog in North America. The majority of our
backlog additions are in the US portion of our construction
segment and these are on much better terms, primarily on a
cost-reimbursable basis versus fixed-price, resulting in a much
lower risk profile for the US portion of this segment. We
also now see opportunities to contract work in our EPC segment
on a cost-reimbursable basis. Notably, our visibility extends
into 2009, with our entire current capacity for mainline
pipeline construction in the US booked through the first
quarter of 2009.
In addition to the increased demand for our pipeline engineering
services, our recent awards for pipeline and station
construction projects in North America reinforce our belief that
our ability to obtain improved terms and conditions and better
pricing will continue in 2007 and beyond. Recent awards support
our belief that customers recognize the imbalance in the supply
and demand for pipeline engineering and construction, and will
offer better terms and conditions, resulting in lower risk to
us, to control pricing increases for our services and to ensure
availability of our services.
SIGNIFICANT
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENTS
InServ
acquisition
On October 31, 2007, we entered into a share purchase
agreement (the InServ SPA) to acquire InServ, based
in Tulsa, Oklahoma, for $225,000 (the InServ Purchase
Price). With the acquisition of InServ, we will
significantly expand our service offering which will allow us to
address the downstream market for integrated solutions on
turnaround, maintenance and capital projects for the hydrocarbon
processing and petrochemical industries. InServ is a fully
integrated downstream contractor with a highly experienced
management team averaging over 30 years of industry
experience. InServs core competencies include turnkey
project services through program management and engineering,
procurement and construction services, which aligns with and
complements our EPC service offering. Additionally, InServ is
one of the four major contractors in the US that provide
services for the overhaul of high utilization fluid catalytic
cracking units, the main gasoline-producing unit in refineries.
These units, which operate continually, are typically overhauled
on a three- to five-year schedule. InServ has performed projects
for 60 of 149 operable refineries in the United States,
providing a balanced suite of services to a customer list which
includes Valero, ChevronTexaco, Marathon, ExxonMobil, BP and
ConocoPhillips. The majority of InServs current service
offerings are spread among six primary services: construction,
turnaround, field, manufacturing, tank, and turnkey project
services; the largest and smallest shares of revenue being
greater than 25 percent and five percent, respectively.
InServ also provides similar overhaul services for other
refinery process units as well as specialty services associated
with welding, piping, and process heaters. Additionally, InServ
manufactures specialty components such as: heater coils, alloy
piping, and other components which require high levels of
expertise for refineries and petrochemical plants.
Since its founding in 1994, InServ experienced rapid and
profitable growth and is in the midst of a market with strong
fundamental drivers including record oil prices and demand for
hydrocarbon derivatives. We believe much of the growth in the
market addressed by InServ is driven by a shift to heavier and
more sour crude streams and the tight labor market which is
leading to greater outsourcing of refinery services. InServ has
also benefited from the shift to more
cost-reimbursable
contract terms and conditions as evidenced by approximately
three quarters of its current contract backlog being
cost-reimbursable.
We also believe there may be opportunities for growth through
selective and strategic acquisitions of businesses or assets
complementary to the current suite of its services.
We plan to finance all or a portion of the cash portion of the
InServ Purchase Price with the net proceeds of this offering of
our common stock. If the net proceeds of this public offering
are insufficient
S-48
Managements
discussion and analysis
to pay the entire cash portion, we plan to finance the balance
through the funding of the 2007 Term Loan discussed below.
Canadian pipeline
construction company acquisition
On July 1, 2007, we acquired the assets and operations of
Midwest Management (1987) Ltd. (Midwest).
Midwest provides pipeline construction, rehabilitation and
maintenance, water crossing installations or replacements, and
facilities fabrication to the oil and gas industry,
predominantly in western Canada. The total purchase amount was
$24,154, consisting of $22,793 in purchase price and
approximately $1,361 in deal costs.
Awarded major
construction contracts
We have been awarded a $303,000 installation contract for the
construction of three segments of the Midcontinent Express
Pipeline by Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC, a joint venture
between Kinder Morgan Energy Partners and Energy Transfer
Partners. The three segments will traverse Oklahoma and Texas
and are composed of approximately 257 miles of
42-inch
pipeline. The projected start date for the project is the third
quarter of 2008.
Midwest was awarded a $77,000 contract for pipeline loops in the
Ft. McMurray, Canada area. The project is scheduled to
begin in the fourth quarter of 2007. Our EPC segment was awarded
a $56,000 contact for station work associated with the Marathon
Oil Company Garyville, Louisiana refinery expansion.
Induced
6.5% Note conversions
The 6.5% Notes were converted in part in May of 2007 under
four transactions resulting in $52,450 in aggregate principal
amount being converted into 2,987,582 shares of our common
stock. We made aggregate cash payments to the holders of
$12,720, plus $1,481 in accrued interest for the current
interest period. Loss on early extinguishment of debt for all
transactions totaled $15,375, including related debt issuance
costs. This conversion strengthens our balance sheet, lowering
our debt to equity ratio from 1.71 to 1 at December 31,
2006 to 1.31 to 1 at September 30, 2007 and improves our
ability to secure the financial instruments required of us by
some of our customers. A stronger balance sheet positions us for
more and larger projects and is a competitive advantage in
todays tight market.
New senior credit
facility
We currently have $250.0 million of commitments for our new
senior secured credit facility (the 2007 Credit
Facility). The 2007 Credit Facility would include a
revolving credit facility in an initial aggregate amount of up
to $150,000. We expect that the entire 2007 Credit Facility will
be available for the issuance of performance letters of credit
and up to 33.3 percent of the 2007 Credit Facility will be
available for borrowings and financial letters of credit. We
expect the 2007 Credit Facility will provide us the option,
subject to the administrative agents consent, to increase
the total revolving commitment up to an amount equal to $200,000
minus any previous permanent reductions in such commitment.
We expect that the 2007 Credit Facility will also include a
senior secured term loan (the 2007 Term Loan) in an
initial aggregate amount of up to $100,000. The 2007 Term Loan
would be available to finance the portion of the purchase price
for the acquisition of InServ that is in excess of the initial
net proceeds of our public offering of common stock. We expect
that the 2007 Term Loan will be made available in a single
advance on the closing date and that any unused commitment will
be terminated on the closing date. The receipt of net cash
proceeds of at least $100,000 from the public offering will be a
condition precedent to closing the 2007 Term Loan.
S-49
Managements
discussion and analysis
Transition
services agreement
Concurrent with the Nigeria sale, we entered into a two-year
Transition Services Agreement ( the TSA) with Ascot
Offshore Nigeria Limited (Ascot). Under the
agreement, we were primarily providing labor in the form of
seconded employees to work under the direction of Ascot, as well
as our owned equipment. Ascot has agreed to reimburse us for the
seconded employee transition services costs. There remain
unresolved issues related to the use of our owned equipment. We
are working with Ascot toward resolution of these issues. We
have not recorded a receivable related to the use of the
equipment. Through September 30, 2007, these reimbursable
costs totaled approximately $21,582. The after-tax net loss from
providing these transition services is $370, or less than two
percent of the incurred costs for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. We are working with Ascot to shift the
transition services provided by us to direct services secured by
Ascot.
In conjunction with the TSA, we have made available certain
equipment to Ascot for use in Nigeria, but this equipment was
not sold to Ascot under the agreement. We have not resolved with
Ascot the rental rates for this equipment for the period
February 8, 2007 through September 30, 2007. As agreed
in the GSA (described below), on September 14, 2007, we
received an appraisal for this equipment; the fair-value of the
equipment was $8,477. Our net book value for this equipment at
September 30, 2007 was $2,377. This equipment is composed
of construction equipment, rolling stock, and generator sets. We
are working with Ascot to resolve the issue of rental equipment,
either through cash settlement or though an exchange of
equipment.
Global settlement
agreement
On September 7, 2007, we finalized a Global Settlement
Agreement (theGSA) with Ascot. The significant
components of the GSA include:
|
|
Ø |
a reduction of $25,000 to the purchase price under the
share purchase agreement entered into on February 7, 2007
(the SPA);
|
|
|
Ø |
supplemental backstop letters of credit provided by Ascot
in the amount of $20,322 issued by a non-Nigerian bank approved
by us;
|
|
|
Ø |
specific indemnities provided by Ascot related to two
ongoing projects that Ascot acquired as part of the SPA;
|
|
|
Ø |
agreement between us and Ascot that all working capital
adjustments as provided for in the SPA were resolved; and
|
|
|
Ø |
except as provided in the GSA, Ascot and the Company
waived all of the respective rights and obligations of Ascot and
us relating to indemnifications provided in the SPA concerning
any breach of a covenant or any representation or warranty,
except as provided in the GSA.
|
By finalizing the GSA with Ascot, we have further reduced our
risk profile in West Africa. The reduction to the purchase price
was offset with amounts owed to us by Ascot of $13,924. This
resulted in a net payment to Ascot of $11,076, and has
eliminated any risk of the collection on amounts owed to us
under the TSA through September 30, 2007. With Ascot
providing supplemental non-Nigerian bank letters of credit that
we have ready access to, we believe the risk to us of incurring
losses due to calls being made on our outstanding letters of
credit is minimized. However, during the transition from us to
Ascot, the operations in Nigeria have continued to be impacted
by the same difficulties that led to our exit from Nigeria as
well as additional challenges. Ascots continued
willingness and ability to perform our former projects in West
Africa are important factors in further reducing our risk
profile in
S-50
Managements
discussion and analysis
Nigeria and elsewhere in West Africa. As such, it was important
under the GSA to receive additional indemnities from Ascot
related to ongoing projects because of our continuing parent
guarantees on those projects. To date, no claims have been made
against our parent guarantees. The GSA also resolves all working
capital adjustment issues between us and Ascot. In resolving the
working capital adjustment, we were able to relieve assets and
liabilities from our books that we felt would have been
components of any working capital adjustment. The completion of
the GSA allows us to recognize a gain on the transaction of
$183. This allows our management to move much closer to putting
the Ascot transaction and Nigeria exit behind us and focus on
better risk-adjusted opportunities.
FINANCIAL
SUMMARY
Continuing
operations
For the quarter ended September 30, 2007, we had income
from continuing operations of $10,272, or $0.36 per basic share
and $0.32 per diluted share, on revenue of $246,716. This
compares to a loss of $4,965, or $0.23 per share, on revenue of
$125,466 for the same quarter of 2006. During this quarter we
reduced the continuing operations accrual for government fines
by $2,000 based on the agreement in principle with the DOJ.
Revenue of $246,716 for the third quarter of 2007
represents a $121,250 (or 96.6 percent) increase over the
revenue for the same period in 2006. Construction revenue
(increased $102,780 or 112.7 percent) and EPC (increased $13,102
or 93.3 percent) segments were the drivers for this revenue
growth.
Contract income increased $27,579 (or 228.9 percent) to
$39,627 in the third quarter of 2007 as compared to $12,048 in
the same quarter of 2006 due to increased activity and
improvement in contract margin in the construction and
engineering segments. Overall contract margin in the third
quarter of 2007, as compared to the third quarter of 2006,
increased 6.5 percentage points to 16.1 percent from
9.6 percent. The engineering segment had margin improvement
of 11.1 percentage points, and the construction segment
improved margin by 6.7 percentage points and EPC margin
improved 3.3 percentage points.
Depreciation and amortization increased $2,192 (or 67.1
percent) to $5,457 in the third quarter of 2007 from $3,265 in
the third quarter of 2006. All of the increase is attributed to
the construction segment and is a result of increased capital
spending, primarily on construction equipment to support the
revenue growth. The acquisition of Midwest accounted for $779 of
the increase.
General and administrative (G&A)
expenses increased $6,356 (or 57.3 percent) to $17,448 in
the third quarter of 2007 from $11,092 in the third quarter of
2006. Corporate G&A expenses increased $3,674 and business
unit G&A expenses increased $2,682. The driver for the
increases is the increase in business activity reflected in the
higher revenue numbers. As a percent of revenue, G&A
expenses decreased to 7.1 percent for the third quarter of 2007
compared to 8.8 percent for the same quarter of 2006.
Income tax We recorded income tax expense of
$6,081 on income before income taxes from continuing operations
of $16,353, resulting in an effective income tax rate of 37.2
percent.
Loss from
discontinued operations, net of taxes
For the third quarter of 2007, the loss from discontinued
operations was $9,126, or $0.32 per basic share, compared to a
loss of $17,136, or $0.80 per basic share, in the third quarter
of 2006. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the
loss from discontinued operations was $21,494, or $0.79 per
basic share, compared to a loss of $46,249, or $2.15 per basic
share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. For
the third quarter of 2007, the net loss was composed primarily
of the accrual
S-51
Managements
discussion and analysis
of a settlement amount due to the SEC of $10,300, consisting of
$8,900 for profit disgorgement plus $1,400 of pre-judgment
interest thereon. The profit disgorgement was specifically
attributable to one of our Nigerian projects, and is therefore
classified as discontinued operations. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, the results of discontinued operations
are composed of income (loss) from 38 days of our
operations in Nigeria, the gain on the sale of our Nigeria
assets and operations, the accrual for profit disgorgement and
pre-judgment interest thereon, and income (loss) from
213 days of service provided under the TSA.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Revenue
A number of factors relating to our business affect the
recognition of contract revenue. We typically structure
contracts as fixed-price, unit-price, time and material, or
cost-plus-fixed-fee.
Revenue from unit-price and time and material contracts is
recognized as earned. We believe that our operating results
should be evaluated over a time horizon during which major
contracts in progress are completed and change orders, extra
work, variations in the scope of work and cost recoveries and
other claims are negotiated and realized.
Revenue for fixed-price and cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts is
recognized on the percentage-of-completion method. Under this
method, estimated contract income and resulting revenue are
generally accrued based on costs incurred to date as a
percentage of total estimated costs, taking into consideration
physical completion. Total estimated costs, and thus contract
income, are impacted by changes in productivity, scheduling, the
unit cost of labor, subcontracts, materials and equipment.
Additionally, external factors such as weather, client needs,
client delays in providing permits and approvals, labor
availability, governmental regulation and politics may affect
the progress of a projects completion and thus the timing
of revenue recognition. We do not recognize income on a
fixed-price contract until the contract is approximately
five percent to 10 percent complete, depending upon
the nature of the contract. If a current estimate of total
contract cost indicates a loss on a contract, the projected loss
is recognized in full when determined.
We consider unapproved change orders to be contract variations
on which we have customer approval for scope change, but not for
changes in price associated with that scope change. Costs
associated with unapproved change orders are included in the
estimated cost to complete the contracts and are expensed as
incurred. We recognize revenue equal to cost incurred on
unapproved changed orders when realization of price approval is
probable and the estimated amount is equal to or greater than
our cost related to the unapproved change order. Revenue
recognized on unapproved change orders is included in
Contract costs and recognized income not yet billed
on the balance sheet.
Unapproved change orders involve the use of estimates, and it is
reasonably possible that revisions to the estimated costs and
recoverable amounts may be required in the future reporting
periods to reflect the changes in estimates or final agreement
with customers. We consider claims to be amounts we seek or will
seek to collect from customers or others for customer-caused
changes in contract specifications or design, or other
customer-related causes of unanticipated additional contract
costs on which there is no agreement with customers on both
scope and price changes. Revenue from claims is recognized when
agreement is reached with customers as to the value of the
claims, which in some instances may not occur until after
completion of work under the contract. Costs associated with
claims are included in the estimated costs to complete the
contracts and are expensed when incurred.
Income
tax
We account for income taxes by the asset and liability method
under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized
for the future tax consequences of operating loss and tax credit
carry forwards
S-52
Managements
discussion and analysis
and temporary differences between the financial statement
carrying values of assets and liabilities and their respective
tax bases. The provision or benefit for income taxes and the
annual effective tax rate are impacted by income taxes in
certain countries being computed based on a deemed income rather
than on taxable income and tax holidays on certain international
projects.
New accounting
policies
Subsequent to December 31, 2006, the following generally
accepted accounting principles have been adopted:
|
|
Ø
|
FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes;
|
|
Ø
|
FASB Staff Position No. AUG AIR-1, Accounting for
Planned Major Maintenance Activities; and
|
OTHER FINANCIAL
MEASURES
EBITDA
We use EBITDA (earnings before net interest, income taxes,
depreciation and amortization) as part of our overall assessment
of financial performance. We believe that EBITDA is used by the
financial community as a method of measuring our performance and
of evaluating the market value of companies considered to be in
businesses similar to ours. EBITDA from continuing operations
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $(10,311)
as compared to $(1,475) for the same period in 2006, an $8,836
decrease. EBITDA for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 includes a $22,000 charge estimated for DOJ fines and
penalties and a $15,375 charge for the early extinguishment of
$52,450 in aggregate principal amount of our 6.5% Notes.
A reconciliation of EBITDA from continuing operations to GAAP
financial information follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(18,598
|
)
|
|
$
|
(33,446
|
)
|
Interest, net
|
|
|
6,132
|
|
|
|
2,119
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
7,793
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,180
|
|
|
|
13,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
(1,475
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog
In our industry, backlog is considered an indicator of potential
future performance because it represents a portion of the future
revenue stream. Our strategy is not focused solely on backlog
additions but on capturing quality backlog with margins
commensurate with the risks associated with a given project.
S-53
Managements
discussion and analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Backlog
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
320,461
|
|
|
|
53.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
883,365
|
|
|
|
80.4
|
%
|
Engineering
|
|
|
92,956
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
%
|
|
|
89,527
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
EPC
|
|
|
188,855
|
|
|
|
31.4
|
%
|
|
|
125,992
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total, continuing operations
|
|
|
602,272
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,098,884
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
406,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total backlog
|
|
$
|
1,009,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,098,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog consists of anticipated revenue from the uncompleted
portions of existing contracts and contracts whose award is
reasonably assured. Backlog from continuing operations at
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was
$1,098,884 and $602,272, respectively, representing an
82.5 percent increase. The increase in backlog is primarily
due to the award of the Midcontinent Express project, the
SouthEast Supply Header contract, the ETC Farrar to Groveton
project and the Suncor Steep Bank project. These increases were
offset by backlog work-off of $610,136 through the first nine
months of 2007. We believe the backlog figures are firm, subject
only to the cancellation and modification provisions contained
in various contracts. Historically, a substantial amount of our
revenue in a given year has not been in our backlog at the
beginning of that year. Additionally, due to the short duration
of many jobs, contracts awarded and completed within a reporting
period will not be reflected in backlog. We generate revenue
from numerous sources, including contracts of long or short
duration entered into during a year as well as from various
contractual processes, including change orders, extra work,
variations in the scope of work and the effect of escalation, or
currency fluctuation formulas. These revenue sources are not
added to backlog until realization is assured.
Backlog for discontinued operations was $406,780 at
December 31, 2006, consisting of backlog related to our
Nigeria operations sold in February 2007.
RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Our contract revenue and contract costs are significantly
impacted by the capital budgets of our clients and the timing
and location of development projects in the oil, gas and power
industries worldwide. Contract revenue and cost vary by country
from year to year as the result of (a) entering and exiting
work countries; (b) the execution of new contract awards;
(c) the completion of contracts; and (d) the overall
level of demand for our services.
Our ability to be successful in obtaining and executing
contracts can be affected by the relative strength or weakness
of the US dollar compared to the currencies of our
competitors, our clients and our work locations.
S-54
Managements
discussion and analysis
Three months
ended September 30, 2007 compared to three months ended
September 30, 2006
Contract
revenue
Contract revenue increased $121,250 (or 96.6 percent) to
$246,716 due to increases in all segments. A quarter-to-quarter
comparison of revenue is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
change
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
91,204
|
|
|
$
|
193,984
|
|
|
$
|
102,780
|
|
|
|
112.7
|
%
|
Engineering
|
|
|
20,216
|
|
|
|
25,584
|
|
|
|
5,368
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
%
|
EPC
|
|
|
14,046
|
|
|
|
27,148
|
|
|
|
13,102
|
|
|
|
93.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
125,466
|
|
|
$
|
246,716
|
|
|
$
|
121,250
|
|
|
|
96.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction revenue in 2007 increased over the same
period in the prior year by $102,780 driven primarily by
increases of $68,295 in the US mainly related to three new major
projects, $31,904 in Canada related to the addition of a major
project and $2,580 in Oman.
Engineering revenue increased $5,368 due to increased
billable hours (both headcount and utilization).
EPC revenue increased $13,102 as the result of an
improved mix of new projects and a significant increase in
activity on our largest EPC project.
Contract
income
Contract income increased $27,579 (or 228.9 percent) to $39,627
in the third quarter of 2007 as compared to the same quarter in
2006. A quarter-to-quarter comparison of contract income is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
change
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
8,292
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
30,580
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
22,288
|
|
|
|
268.8
|
%
|
Engineering
|
|
|
2,924
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
%
|
|
|
6,550
|
|
|
|
25.6
|
%
|
|
|
3,626
|
|
|
|
124.0
|
%
|
EPC
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
|
|
200.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
12,048
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
39,627
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
27,579
|
|
|
|
228.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction contract income increased over 2006 by
$22,288 driven primarily by increases in activity for
US construction of $17,715, an increase in Canada of $1,347
and an increase in Oman of $2,348 related to an increase in
activity for oilfield services while indirect contract cost
decreased $878 due to the consolidation of equipment and
overhead support functions.
Engineering contract margin improved 11.1 percentage
points in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the third
quarter of 2006 accounting for $2,850 of the $3,626 increase.
The margin improvement was driven by increased demand for our
engineering services allowing for higher pricing combined with a
more favorable mix of company versus subcontractor and third
party resources.
EPC realized a 3.3 percentage point increase in
contract margin, which when combined with the increased revenue
resulted in a $1,665 increase in contract income.
S-55
Managements
discussion and analysis
Other
operating expenses
Depreciation and amortization increased $2,192 (or 67.1
percent) to $5,457 in the third quarter of 2007 from $3,265 in
the same quarter of last year primarily due to increasing our
equipment fleet in the last half of 2006 through the third
quarter of 2007, utilizing a combination of capital leases and
equipment purchases. In the third quarter of 2007, we added
$4,655 of equipment through capital leases, $7,952 of equipment
through purchases and $14,873 in depreciable assets though the
acquisition of Midwest.
G&A expenses increased $6,356 (or 57.3 percent) to
$17,448 in the third quarter of 2007 from $11,092 in the third
quarter of 2006. Corporate G&A increased $3,674 and
business unit G&A increased $2,682. Salaries and benefits
increased $2,473 as a result of increased staff at corporate and
the segments supporting increased business activity and as a
result of increases in stock compensation, and bonuses. Process
and travel expenses increased $875 as a result of increased
activity. Consulting expense increased $586 primarily at the
corporate headquarters due to continued work on the SEC/DOJ
investigation, enhancements to the accounting system, and
increased risk management activities. Bank charges increased
$697 and accounting and audit expense increased $649.
Government fines from continuing operations include a
$2,000 reduction to $22,000 based on our agreement in principle
with the DOJ.
Non-operating
items
Interest income increased to $1,029 in the third quarter
of 2007 from $337 in the same quarter of 2006. The $692 (or
205.3 percent) increase is due to interest income earned on the
$125,068 in net proceeds received as a result of the sale of the
Nigeria assets and operations. The proceeds were received in the
first quarter of 2007. Since the first quarter a decreasing
trend of interest income resulted from lower cash balances,
including $24,154 used for the Midwest acquisition.
Interest expense decreased to $2,071 in the third quarter
from $3,046 in the same quarter of 2006. The $975 (or 32.0
percent) reduction in interest expense was driven primarily by
the $52,450 reduction in the outstanding principal amount of the
6.5% Notes, as a result of their conversion to common stock
in the second quarter of 2007.
Other, net resulted in an expense of $1,327 in the third
quarter of 2007 compared to income of $432 in the same quarter
of 2006. The third quarter of 2007 included a $1,071 charge
related to the settlement of a lawsuit with a vendor. The third
quarter of 2006 included gains on sales of property, plant and
equipment of $522, all related to the sale of Canadian real
estate and other equipment.
Income tax We recognized $6,081 of income tax
expense on income from continuing operations of $16,353 before
income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
During the third quarter of 2006, we recorded income tax expense
of $379 on a loss from continuing operations of $4,586 for the
three months ended September 30, 2006. During the third
quarter of 2007, we recognized increased income tax expense due
to improved financial performance in the United States.
S-56
Managements
discussion and analysis
Nine months ended
September 30, 2007 compared to nine months ended
September 30, 2006
Contract
revenue
Contract revenue from continuing operations increased $257,987
(or 73.3 percent) to $610,168 due primarily to an increase in
the construction segment. A year-to-date comparison of revenue
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
change
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
257,587
|
|
|
$
|
476,638
|
|
|
$
|
219,051
|
|
|
|
85.0
|
%
|
Engineering
|
|
|
55,621
|
|
|
|
66,040
|
|
|
|
10,419
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
%
|
EPC
|
|
|
38,973
|
|
|
|
67,490
|
|
|
|
28,517
|
|
|
|
73.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
352,181
|
|
|
$
|
610,168
|
|
|
$
|
257,987
|
|
|
|
73.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction revenue increased by $219,051 driven
primarily by the increase in US construction of $148,342
and an increase in revenues in Canada of $53,358 related to the
addition of a major project and an increase in Oman of $17,351.
Engineering revenue increased $10,419 due to an increase
in billable hours (both headcount and utilization). Work on new
contacts, since the third quarter of 2006, accounted for $14,406
of revenue, while existing contracts contributed approximately
$51,634 of revenue.
EPC revenue increased $28,517 primarily as the result of
a significant increase in activity on our largest EPC project.
Contract
income
Contract income increased $39,825 (or 126.2 percent) to $71,378
in the first three quarters of 2007 as compared to the same
period in 2006. A period-to-period comparison of contract income
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
change
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
19,415
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
48,672
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
29,257
|
|
|
|
150.7
|
%
|
Engineering
|
|
|
9,023
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
|
|
16,874
|
|
|
|
25.6
|
%
|
|
|
7,851
|
|
|
|
87.0
|
%
|
EPC
|
|
|
3,115
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
5,832
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
|
|
2,717
|
|
|
|
87.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
31,553
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
71,378
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
39,825
|
|
|
|
126.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The contract income increase was a function of significantly
higher contract revenues as discussed above and slightly better
margins.
Construction contract income increased $29,257 over 2006
despite the negative impact on contract income and margins
experienced in the first six months of 2007 due to sustained
inclement weather. US construction increased $12,756,
Canadian construction increased $10,354, mainly due to the
addition of a major project in 2007, while construction in Oman
increased $2,965 related to increased activity in oilfield
services, while indirect contract cost decreased $3,182 due to
the consolidation of equipment and overhead support functions.
S-57
Managements
discussion and analysis
Engineering contract income increased $7,851 and contract
margins increased 9.4 percentage points during the first
nine months of 2007 as compared to the first nine months of
2006. As previously indicated, this improvement was driven by an
increased mix of company direct labor versus third party and
subcontractor services. The higher mix of in-house labor,
improved utilization and higher headcount are characteristics of
the strong demand for engineering work and our success of hiring
and retaining in-house engineers.
EPC contract income increased $2,717 on increased
revenues and a slight margin percentage improvement.
Other operating
expenses
Depreciation and amortization increased $4,043 (or 44.0
percent) to $13,223 in the first nine months of 2007 from $9,180
in the same period last year primarily due to our increase in
plant, property and equipment throughout the last half of 2006
and the first half of 2007 through capital leases and direct
purchase. For the first nine months of 2007, we added $29,780 of
equipment through capital leases and $15,890 of equipment
through purchases along with $14,873 in depreciable assets from
the acquisition of Midwest.
G&A expenses increased $9,162 (or 27.7 percent) to
$42,295 in the first nine months of 2007 from $33,133 in the
same period of 2006. Corporate G&A expenses increased
$5,937 and business unit G&A expenses increased $3,225.
Salaries and benefits increased $4,018 as a result of additional
staff supporting increased business activity and as a result of
increases in stock compensation, and bonuses. Consulting expense
increased $1,076 primarily at the corporate headquarters due to
continued work on the SEC/DOJ investigation, enhancements to the
accounting system and increased risk management activities. Bank
charges increased $1,762 and accounting and auditing fees
increased $849. Process and travel expenses increased $592.
Government fines consist of $22,000 based on the
agreement in principle with the DOJ.
Non-operating
items
Interest income increased to $4,433 in the nine months of
2007 from $1,350 in the first nine months of 2006. The $3,083
(or 228.4 percent) increase is due primarily to interest income
earned on the $125,068 in proceeds received in the first quarter
of 2007 from the sale of the Nigeria assets and operations.
Interest expense decreased to $6,552 in the first nine
months of 2007 from $7,482 in the first nine months of 2006. The
$930 (or 12.4 percent) decrease in interest expense was driven
primarily by a $52,450 reduction in the outstanding principal
amount of the 6.5% Notes as a result of their conversion to
common stock in the second quarter of 2007, partially offset by
the addition $28,550 in capital leases.
Other, net resulted in an expense of $2,019 in the first
nine months of 2007 compared to income of $105 in the same
period 2006. The $2,124 increase is a result of a $997
registration delay penalty related to privately placed shares of
common stock, a $350 settlement associated with an ongoing
dispute related to an engineering project, offset by the $1,051
gain on the sale of land, buildings, and equipment in Houston,
Texas. Also reflected in the increased expense is a $1,071
charge related to the settlement of a lawsuit with a vendor.
Loss on early extinguishment of debt We
induced conversion of approximately $52,450 (or
62.1 percent) of aggregate principal amount of our
6.5% Notes resulting in the recognition of a loss on early
extinguishment of debt of $15,375.
S-58
Managements
discussion and analysis
Income tax We recognized $7,793 of income tax
expense on a loss of $25,653 before income taxes in the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 compared to income tax
expense of $1,811 on a loss from continuing operations of
$16,787 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The
circumstances that gave rise to our recording tax provisions
while incurring losses for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006 were primarily due to taxable
income being generated in certain tax jurisdictions, and our
having incurred non-deductible expenses and expenses in Panama,
where Willbros Group, Inc. is domiciled and receives no tax
benefit.
Fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006 compared to fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005
Contract
revenue
Contract revenue increased $248,780 (or 84.5 percent) to
$543,259 primarily as a result of increases in Construction. A
year-to-year comparison of revenue is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
decrease
|
|
|
change
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
214,020
|
|
|
$
|
421,270
|
|
|
$
|
207,250
|
|
|
|
96.8
|
%
|
Engineering
|
|
|
43,194
|
|
|
|
75,833
|
|
|
|
32,639
|
|
|
|
75.6
|
%
|
EPC
|
|
|
37,265
|
|
|
|
46,156
|
|
|
|
8,891
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contract revenue
|
|
$
|
294,479
|
|
|
$
|
543,259
|
|
|
$
|
248,780
|
|
|
|
84.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction revenue increased $207,250 primarily as a
result of increased work in Canada and in the United States. The
increase in Canada revenue is attributable to $57,011 in new
major projects, increased fabrication and maintenance revenue of
$29,555, and our new Edmonton modular fabrication facility that
opened in the fourth quarter of 2005, which generated revenue of
approximately $13,828 in 2006, compared to $87 in 2005.
Construction revenue in the United States increased
approximately $61,380 due to a higher level of activity, and in
Oman, construction revenue increased $43,922 due to new pipeline
construction contracts and oilfield services contracts.
Engineering revenue increased $32,639, including an
increase of $23,260 from a single large engineering project in
the United States and approximately $12,100 in new projects.
EPC revenue increased $8,891 due to several new EPC
projects in the United States and $1,527 from increased
government services revenue.
Contract
income
Contract income increased $25,358 (or 89.3 percent) to
$53,765 in 2006 as compared to 2005. A year-to-year comparison
of contract income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Increase/
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
decrease
|
|
|
change
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
14,869
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
35,081
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
20,212
|
|
|
|
135.9
|
%
|
Engineering
|
|
|
3,602
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
13,848
|
|
|
|
18.3
|
%
|
|
|
10,246
|
|
|
|
284.5
|
%
|
EPC
|
|
|
9,936
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
%
|
|
|
4,836
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
(5,100
|
)
|
|
|
(51.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contract revenue
|
|
$
|
28,407
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
53,765
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
25,358
|
|
|
|
89.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-59
Managements
discussion and analysis
Construction contract income increased $20,212 as a
result of a $13,239 increase in Canada, a $3,821 increase in
Oman and an improvement of $1,824 due to project completions in
the prior year which resulted in a decrease in expenses.
Contract income in the United States had a slight increase of
only $1,328 on lower margins resulting from a tight labor
market, project
start-up
delays and inclement weather on several large construction
projects.
Engineering income increased $10,246 as a result of
increased engineering work in the United States at generally
higher margins.
EPC income decreased $5,100 as a result of decreased
margins in the United States due to completion of a high margin
project in 2005, increased costs related to a tight labor
market, new project startup delays and inclement weather on
certain projects.
Other
operating expenses
Depreciation and amortization increased $742 (or
6.3 percent) to $12,430 in 2006 from $11,688 in 2005 due to
2006 equipment purchases of $11,373 and property acquired
through capital leases valued at $12,108. Construction
depreciation and amortization increased to $8,935 from $8,359,
or 6.9 percent. Engineering depreciation and amortization
decreased to $827 from $1,065, or 22.3 percent. EPC
depreciation and amortization increased to $2,668 from $2,234,
or 19.4 percent.
G&A expenses increased $11,016 to $53,366 in 2006
from $42,350 in 2005. The increase in G&A not only
reflected higher levels of business activity in the United
States and Canada but also included severance costs of $6,300
related to executive management changes and $3,400 associated
with increased costs in outside legal, accounting, auditing and
consulting fees.
Non-operating
items
Interest, net increased to an expense of $8,265 in 2006
from an expense of $3,904 in 2005 due primarily to additional
interest expense related to the 6.5% Notes of $4,871.
Foreign exchange and Other, net decreased to
income of $569 in 2006 from $742 in 2005, an unfavorable
variance of $173. This variance was caused primarily by a $429
reduction in gains on sale of property, plant and equipment and
an increase in foreign exchange loss of $164. These reductions
in income were offset by an increase in miscellaneous income of
$420 mainly related to our participation as a plaintiff in the
settlement of a class action suit.
Income taxWe recognized $2,308 of income tax
expense on a loss for continuing operations of $19,727. This was
an increase of $640 compared to 2005. Due to expenses of $28,311
occurring in Panama where no tax benefit is obtained, we
incurred a tax expense on a loss from continuing operations.
Permanent timing differences in the United States also
contributed to a higher effective tax rate.
Loss
from discontinued operations, net of taxes
We recognized a net loss from discontinued operations of $83,402
in 2006 compared to a net loss of $8,319 in 2005, an increase
loss of $75,083. The Nigeria operations accounted for $83,773 of
the 2006 loss. A loss of $971 in Venezuela and a recognized net
gain of $1,342 on the sale of the Opal TXP-4 account for the
remainder of the 2006 loss from discontinued operations.
S-60
Managements
discussion and analysis
Fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005 compared to fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004
Contract
revenue
Contract revenue increased $21,685 (or 7.9 percent) to
$294,479 in 2005 from $272,794 in 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
decrease
|
|
|
change
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
226,662
|
|
|
$
|
214,020
|
|
|
$
|
(12,642
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)%
|
Engineering
|
|
|
30,993
|
|
|
|
43,194
|
|
|
|
12,201
|
|
|
|
39.4
|
%
|
EPC
|
|
|
15,139
|
|
|
|
37,265
|
|
|
|
22,126
|
|
|
|
146.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contract revenue
|
|
$
|
272,794
|
|
|
$
|
294,479
|
|
|
$
|
21,685
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction revenue decreased $12,642 (or
5.6 percent) in 2005 compared to 2004. The net decrease
consisted of decreases of $54,029 due to the completion of the
Iraq project in 2004, $11,554 in Oman, and $10,161 due to the
2004 completion of other projects, primarily those in Bolivia
and Ecuador, offset by increases of $41,871 in our US
construction division due to new pipeline construction projects
and $21,230 in Canada from continuation of work relating to
maintenance and fabrication contracts in the Canadian oil sands.
Engineering revenue increased $12,201 primarily as a
result of increased engineering work in the United States.
EPC revenue increased $22,126 due to new EPC projects in
the United States.
Contract
income
Contract income decreased $22,030 (or 43.7 percent) to
$28,407 in 2005 from $50,437 in 2004. Variations in contract
costs by country were closely related to the variations in
contract revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Increase/
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
decrease
|
|
|
change
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
47,038
|
|
|
|
20.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
14,869
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
(32,169
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
.4)
|
%
|
Engineering
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
3,602
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
2,688
|
|
|
|
294
|
.1
|
%
|
EPC
|
|
|
2,485
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
|
9,936
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
%
|
|
|
7,451
|
|
|
|
299
|
.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contract income
|
|
$
|
50,437
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
28,407
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
(22,030
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
.7)
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction income decreased $32,169 primarily as a
result of projects which were completed in 2004, including Iraq,
$17,769, Bolivia, $5,510, and Ecuador, $1,309 and decreases in
Oman of $4,573, the United States of $2,585, and in Canada of
$578. The decline in the contract margin percent resulted
primarily from the high margin recognized from the completed
2004 Iraq project and the 2004 benefit from the Bolivia
Transierra Project claim settlement. Lower contract margins in
Canada due to
start-up
costs in association with the new fabrication facility and cost
overruns on certain construction projects all contributed to the
decline. These declines in contract margin were partially offset
by higher contract margins on pipeline construction projects in
the United States.
Engineering income increased $2,688 primarily as a result
of increased engineering work in the United States with improved
margins.
S-61
Managements
discussion and analysis
EPC income increased $7,451 primarily as a result of
increased EPC work in the United States with improved margins,
much of which related to a single large project.
Other operating
expenses
Depreciation and amortization increased $1,912 (or
19.6 percent) to $11,688 in 2005 due to 2005 capital
expenditures of $25,111 and a full years depreciation on
the new world-wide information technology system. Construction
depreciation and amortization increased to $8,389 from $7,541,
or 11.2 percent. Engineering depreciation and amortization
increased to $1,065 from $878, or 21.3 percent. EPC
depreciation and amortization increased to $2,234 from $1,357,
or 64.6 percent.
G&A expenses increased $9,825 (or 30.2 percent)
to $42,350 in 2005 compared to $32,525 in 2004. The increase in
G&A expense was a result of increased activity in North
America as well as increased spending on office facilities and
information technology of approximately $5,000.
Non-operating
items
Interest, net, including amortization of debt issue cost,
increased $2,133 to an expense of $5,481 in 2005 from an expense
of $3,348 in 2004 due primarily to the write-off of debt
restructuring cost of $1,203 and higher debt levels during 2005
versus 2004. Interest income increased $709 to $1,577 in 2005
compared to $868 in 2004, as a result of an overall increase in
invested funds in 2005 as compared to 2004.
The provision for income taxes in 2005 was $1,668, an increase
of $2,695 over the 2004 benefit of $1,027. The companys
net income in 2004 included non-taxable revenue from Iraq of
$54,029, allowing the net benefit, while in 2005 the company had
expenses of $20,980 in Panama where no tax benefit is obtained.
Loss from
discontinued operations, net of taxes
The loss from discontinued operations decreased $18,792 from a
loss of $27,111 in 2004 to a loss of $8,319 in 2005. The
reduction in the loss from discontinued operations is due to a
$212,791 increase in revenue attributable entirely to our
Nigeria operations and a 6.8 percent increase in contract
margin.
LIQUIDITY AND
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our objective in financing our business is to maintain adequate
financial resources and access to additional liquidity. During
the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the proceeds from
the sale of our Nigeria assets and operations were our principal
source of funding. We anticipate that cash on hand after giving
effect to this offering, future cash flows from operations and
the availability of a revolving credit facility (see below) will
be sufficient to fund our working capital needs in the near
term. However, we will continue to review all opportunities to
the extent that market conditions and other factors permit, to
provide working capital to fund our growing backlog, strengthen
our balance sheet, meet current capital equipment requirements,
and pursue business expansion opportunities, including the
offering contemplated by this prospectus supplement.
Additional
sources and uses of capital
Financing of
pending acquisition
On October 31, 2007, our subsidiary, Willbros USA, Inc., entered
into a definitive agreement for the purchase of all of the
issued and outstanding equity interests of InServ. The purchase
price will be $225,000, consisting of $202,500 payable in cash
at closing and Willbros Group, Inc. common stock having a value
of $22,500. The cash portion of the purchase price will be
subject to a post-closing
S-62
Managements
discussion and analysis
adjustment to account for any change in InServs working
capital from a predetermined target to InServs actual
working capital on the closing date.
We plan to finance all or a portion of the cash portion of the
purchase price with the net proceeds of this offering of our
common stock. If the net proceeds of this public offering are
insufficient to pay the entire cash portion of the purchase
price, we plan to finance the balance through the funding of the
2007 Term Loan, described below.
2007 credit
facility
We currently have $250.0 million of commitments for the
2007 Credit Facility. The 2007 Credit Facility will include a
revolving credit facility in an initial aggregate amount of up
to $150,000. We expect that the entire 2007 Credit Facility will
be available for the issuance of performance letters of credit
and up to 33.3 percent of the 2007 Credit Facility will be
available for borrowings and financial letters of credit. We
expect the 2007 Credit Facility will provide us the option,
subject to the agents consent, and on or before the second
anniversary of the closing date, to increase the total revolving
commitment up to an amount equal to $200,000 less any previous
permanent reductions in commitments.
We expect that the 2007 Credit Facility will also include the
2007 Term Loan in an initial aggregate amount of up to $100,000.
The 2007 Term Loan would be available to finance that portion of
the purchase price for the acquisition of InServ that is in
excess of the initial net proceeds of our public offering of
common stock. We expect that the 2007 Term Loan will be made
available in a single advance on the closing date of the 2007
Credit Facility and that any unused 2007 Term Loan commitment
will be terminated on the closing date. The receipt of net cash
proceeds of at least $100,000 from the public offering will be a
condition precedent to closing the 2007 Term Loan.
Indenture
waiver
A covenant in the indenture for our 6.5% Notes prohibits us
from incurring any additional indebtedness if our consolidated
leverage ratio exceeds 4.00 to 1. As of September 30, 2007,
this covenant would preclude us from borrowing under the 2006
Credit Facility discussed below or the 2007 Credit Facility. On
November 2, 2007, we entered into an agreement with the
holder of a majority in principal amount of our outstanding
6.5% Notes, which waives the debt incurrence covenant
through June 30, 2008. The waiver should enable us to
access the 2007 Term Loan, if needed to complete the acquisition
of InServ, and to access the revolving credit facility under the
2007 Credit Facility, if needed for working capital purposes. We
anticipate that our improving operating results will enable us
to continue to access the revolving credit facility upon
expiration of the waiver.
2006 credit
facility
On October 27, 2006, Willbros USA, Inc., a wholly owned
subsidiary of us, entered into a $100,000 three-year senior
secured synthetic credit facility (the 2006 Credit
Facility) with a group of lenders led by Calyon New York
Branch (Calyon). At September 30, 2007, the
2006 Credit Facility had available capacity of $19,832. We may
elect to increase the total capacity under the 2006 Credit
Facility to $150,000, with consent from Calyon. We have received
a commitment from Calyon, which expires December 2007, to
increase the capacity under the 2006 Credit Facility to
$125,000. As of September 30, 2007 we have not exercised
this option to extend the 2006 Credit Facility and currently
anticipate that the 2007 Credit Facility will replace the 2006
Credit Facility in its entirety. Borrowings have not taken
place, nor is it our present intent to use the 2006 Credit
Facility for future borrowings. The 2006 Credit Facility was
established primarily to provide a source for letters of credit.
Unamortized costs associated with the creation of the 2006
Credit Facility of $1,463 and $1,986 are included in
S-63
Managements
discussion and analysis
other assets at September 30, 2007, and December 31,
2006, respectively, and are being amortized over the three-year
term of the credit facility ending October 2009.
As of September 30, 2007, there were no borrowings
outstanding under the 2006 Credit Facility and there were
$80,168 in outstanding letters of credit, consisting of $59,846
issued for projects in continuing operations and $20,322 issued
for projects related to discontinued operations. As of
December 31, 2006, there were no borrowings outstanding
under the 2006 Credit Facility and there were $64,545 in
outstanding letters of credit, consisting of $41,920 issued for
projects in continuing operations and $22,625 issued for
projects related to discontinued operations. We are currently
prohibited from borrowing under the 2006 Credit Facility due to
debt incurrence restrictions of the 6.5% Notes.
The 2006 Credit Facility includes customary affirmative and
negative covenants, such as limitations on the creation of new
indebtedness and on certain liens, restrictions on certain
transactions and maintenance of the following financial
covenants:
|
|
Ø
|
a consolidated tangible net worth in an amount of not less than
the sum of $116,561 plus 50 percent of consolidated net
income earned in each quarter ended after December 31, 2006;
|
|
Ø
|
a maximum senior leverage ratio of 1.00 to 1.00 for the quarter
ended September 30, 2007 and for each quarter thereafter;
|
|
Ø
|
a fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 3.00 to 1.00, for
the quarter ended September 30, 2007, and for each quarter
thereafter; and
|
|
Ø
|
a prohibition on capital expenditures (cost of assets added
through purchase or capital lease) if our liquidity falls below
$50,000.
|
If these covenants are violated, it would be considered an event
of default entitling the lenders to terminate the remaining
commitment, call all outstanding letters of credit, and
accelerate any principal and interest outstanding. As of
September 30, 2007:
|
|
Ø
|
our consolidated tangible net worth was $151,934, which was
approximately $35,373 in excess of the net tangible worth we
were required to maintain under the credit facility;
|
|
Ø
|
we are in compliance with the maximum senior leverage ratio
because we have incurred no revolving advance or other senior
debt;
|
|
Ø
|
our fixed charge coverage ratio is 6.17 to 1.00; and
|
|
Ø
|
our cash balance at September 30, 2007 was $58,709, which
allowed us to add $53,296 of fixed assets to our balance sheet
during the previous 12 months.
|
At September 30, 2007, we were in compliance with all of
these covenants.
Our capital planning process is focused on utilizing cash in
ways that enhance the value of our company. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2007, we used cash for a variety
of activities including working capital needs, capital
expenditures and acquisitions.
Cash
flows
Cash flows provided by (used in) continuing operations were as
follows for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
(12,717
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,629
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
26,436
|
|
|
|
66,952
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
7,841
|
|
|
|
(28,445
|
)
|
S-64
Managements
discussion and analysis
Statements of cash flows for entities with international
operations that are local currency functional exclude the
effects of the changes in foreign currency exchange rates that
occur during any given period, as these are non-cash charges. As
a result, changes reflected in certain accounts on the
consolidated condensed statements of cash flows may not reflect
the changes in corresponding accounts on the consolidated
condensed balance sheets.
Operating
activities
Operating activities of continuing operations used $22,629 of
cash in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared
to a use of $12,717 in the nine months ended September 30,
2006. Cash flows from operating activities decreased $9,912
primarily due to:
|
|
Ø
|
a decrease in cash as a result of an increase in other working
capital of $41,669 due primarily to increased receivables as a
result of higher revenues; and
|
|
Ø
|
an increase of $31,757 in cash generated by operations excluding
non-cash charges of $33,612.
|
Investing
activities
Investing activities of continuing operations provided $66,952
of cash in the nine months ended September 30, 2007
compared to providing $26,436 in the nine months ended
September 30, 2006. Significant transactions impacting cash
flows from investing activities include:
|
|
Ø
|
disposition of discontinued operations, for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 provided $105,568 of cash compared
to $32,082 in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. In
2007 the proceeds were from the sale of our Nigeria assets and
operations, while in 2006 the proceeds were from the sale of the
Opal gas facility and the sale of our Venezuela assets and
operations;
|
|
Ø
|
disposition of property, plant, and equipment for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 provided $1,428 of cash
compared to $8,243; and
|
|
Ø
|
the acquisition of Midwest in 2007 used $24,154 of cash.
|
Financing
activities
Financing activities of continuing operations used $28,445 of
cash in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared
to providing $7,841 in the nine months ended September 30,
2006. Significant transactions impacting cash flows from
financing activities include:
|
|
Ø
|
$12,993 of cash used to induce the conversion of $52,450 of our
6.5% Notes;
|
|
Ø
|
cash used in payments on capital leases of $7,507; and
|
|
Ø
|
cash used in payments on notes payable of $8,665.
|
Capital
requirements
During the first nine months of 2007, we used $22,629 of cash in
our continuing operations. While this cash use has been
significant we believe that through our increase in activity
combined with our conservative financial management we will be
able to provide cash from continuing operations in the near
term. As such, we are focused on the following significant
capital requirements: providing working capital for projects in
process and those scheduled to begin, the pending acquisition of
InServ, the acquisition of additional construction equipment and
the payments due to the government related to fines, penalties,
and profit disgorgement.
|
|
Ø |
We believe that we will be able to support our ongoing working
capital needs through operating cash flows as well as the
availability of the 2007 Credit Facility.
|
S-65
Managements
discussion and analysis
|
|
Ø
|
We expect to fund the cash portion of the acquisition of InServ
in its entirety with the proceeds from our impending public
offering of common stock and, if necessary, the 2007 Term Loan.
|
|
Ø
|
We expect to use any remaining net proceeds from the public
offering to acquire additional construction equipment
instrumental to completing our existing backlog of work at the
highest return available.
|
|
Ø
|
We intend to fund the future payments that we will make to the
SEC and the DOJ under the proposed terms of our settlements in
principle from operating cash flow.
|
Contractual
obligations
As of September 30, 2007, we had $102,050 of outstanding
debt related to the convertible notes. In addition, in 2007 and
2006, we entered into various capital leases of construction
equipment and property with a value of $41,888. We also have a
contractual requirement to pay a facility fee of five percent of
aggregate commitments under the 2006 Credit Facility. We have
acquired a note to finance insurance premiums in the amount of
$10,051.
Other contractual obligations and commercial commitments, as
detailed in our annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, did not materially
change except for payments made in the normal course of business.
S-66
OVERVIEW
We are a provider of services primarily to the high growth
global energy infrastructure market. In particular, we are a
leading service provider to the hydrocarbon pipeline market,
having performed work in 59 countries and constructed over
200,000 kilometers of pipelines, which we believe positions us
as one of the top two pipeline contractors in the world. We
offer a wide range of services to our customers, including
engineering, project management, construction services and
specialty services, such as operations and maintenance, each of
which we offer discretely or in combination as a fully
integrated offering (which we refer to as EPC).
We offer clients full asset lifecycle services and in some cases
we provide the entire scope of services for a project, from
front-end engineering and design through project construction,
commissioning and ongoing facility operations and maintenance.
While our capabilities extend from upstream sources to
downstream distribution, our primary end market is the global
onshore midstream energy market. In North America, where we
currently have over 90 percent of our backlog, our projects
include major cross-country and intrastate pipelines that
transport natural gas, crude oil and petroleum products; gas
gathering systems; gas processing systems; oil and gas
production facilities; and modular processing facilities. The
balance of our backlog is for projects providing similar
services in select overseas locations. Now in our one hundredth
year, we serve major natural gas, petroleum and power companies
and government entities worldwide.
RECENT
DEVELOPMENTS
Pending
acquisition
On October 31, 2007, we entered into a share purchase
agreement pursuant to which we agreed to acquire all of the
outstanding equity interests of InServ, a Tulsa, Oklahoma based
company, for approximately $225 million. With the
acquisition of InServ, we will significantly expand our service
offering to the downstream market providing integrated solutions
for turnaround, maintenance and capital projects for the
hydrocarbon processing and petrochemical industries. We believe
that the growth in the market addressed by InServ is
attributable to numerous factors, including:
|
|
Ø
|
continued strength in maintenance, repair and overhaul, and
capital spending;
|
|
Ø
|
a need to upgrade or convert existing refineries to facilitate a
shift to heavier and more sour crude streams, particularly from
the Canadian oil sands;
|
|
Ø
|
an increasing emphasis on safety;
|
|
Ø
|
a decline in the number of operating refineries over the past
15 years, combined with an aging refinery infrastructure,
averaging over 30 years in service, is resulting in higher
ongoing refinery utilization rates requiring increasing
maintenance and expansion expenditures; and
|
|
Ø
|
an increasing level of outsourcing of refinery services as
producers focus on core operations.
|
Recent
acquisition
On July 1, 2007, we acquired all of the share capital of
Midwest Management (1987) Ltd. (Midwest), a
Canadian pipeline and facilities construction company which owns
two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Midwest Pipelines Rental Inc. and
Midwest General Contractors Ltd. Midwest provides pipeline
construction, rehabilitation and maintenance, water crossing
installations or replacements, and facilities fabrication to the
oil and gas industry, predominantly in western Canada. The total
purchase amount was approximately $24.2 million. This
acquisition expands our capability in Canada to include
S-67
Business
mainline pipeline construction in addition to our oil sands
maintenance, construction and fabrication capabilities.
Discontinued
operations
In June 2006, we announced our decision to sell our assets and
operations in Nigeria, and in February 2007, we completed
the sale. In 2006, we also sold our interest in a water
injection facility in Venezuela and our TXP-4 gas processing
plant in Opal, Wyoming. The results of operations for each of
Nigeria, Venezuela and the TXP-4 Plant are reported as
discontinued operations in our consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus supplement. We expect to
focus our resources and attention on the United States and
Canada and a few other selected international markets which
offer attractive risk-adjusted returns. The remainder of the
discussion under the caption Business in this
prospectus supplement pertains only to our continuing
operations, unless otherwise noted.
Global settlement
agreement
On August 15, 2007, we and our subsidiary Willbros
International Services (Nigeria) Limited, entered into a Global
Settlement Agreement with Ascot Offshore Nigeria Limited, the
purchaser of our assets and operations in Nigeria, and its
parent company, Berkeley Group Plc. Among other matters, the
Global Settlement Agreement provides for the payment of an
amount in full and final settlement of all disputes between
Ascot and us related to the working capital adjustment to the
closing purchase price under the February 2007 share
purchase agreement. In connection with the February
2007 share purchase agreement, we also entered into a
transition services agreement with Ascot, and Ascot delivered a
promissory note in favor of us.
The Global Settlement Agreement provides for a settlement amount
of $25.0 million, the amount by which we and Ascot agreed
to adjust the closing purchase price under the share purchase
agreement downward in respect of working capital at the closing
(the Settlement Amount). The Global Settlement
Agreement provides that a portion of the Settlement Amount will
be retained by us and credited to the account of Ascot for
amounts totaling up to approximately $11.3 million which
were due from Ascot to us under the transition services
agreement and the note. The payment of the balance of the
Settlement Amount will finally settle any and all obligations
and disputes between Ascot and us in relation to the adjustment
to the closing purchase price. As part consideration for the
parties agreement on the Settlement Amount, and as a
condition to payment by us of the balance of the Settlement
Amount, Ascot has secured supplemental backstop letters of
credit totaling approximately $20.3 million with
non-Nigerian banks.
The Global Settlement Agreement also provides for the
termination of all of our and Ascots respective rights and
obligations under the indemnification provisions of the share
purchase agreement except as provided in the Global Settlement
Agreement.
Induced
conversion of the 6.5% Notes
In May 2007, we induced the conversion of approximately
$52.5 million in aggregate principal amount of our
6.5% Notes into 2,987,582 shares of our common stock.
We made aggregate cash payments to the holders of approximately
$12.7 million, plus approximately $1.5 million in
accrued interest. These conversion transactions improved our
debt to equity ratio from 1.71 to 1 at December 31, 2006 to
1.31 to 1 at September 30, 2007.
S-68
Business
GENERAL
We provide services to our customers through three segments:
|
|
Ø
|
Engineering. We specialize in providing
engineering services, from feasibility studies through detailed
design, to assist clients in conceptualizing, evaluating,
designing and managing the construction or expansion of
pipelines, compressor stations, pump stations, fuel storage
facilities, and field gathering and production facilities.
|
|
Ø
|
Construction. Our construction
expertise includes systems, personnel and equipment to construct
and replace large-diameter cross-country pipelines; fabricate
engineered structures, process modules and facilities; and
construct oil and gas production facilities, pump stations, flow
stations, gas compressor stations, gas processing facilities and
other related facilities. We also provide certain specialty
services to increase our equipment and personnel utilization.
|
|
Ø
|
Engineering, procurement and
construction. Our fully integrated EPC
services offering includes the full range of engineering,
procurement, construction and project management resources to
provide end-to-end total project solutions to our customers.
|
We provide our engineering, construction and EPC services, as
the scope of work requires, through professional engineering,
technical staff, construction management and craft personnel
utilizing engineering systems, hardware and software and a large
fleet of company-owned and leased equipment that includes
pipelaying equipment, heavy construction equipment,
transportation equipment and camp equipment. An inventory of
spare parts and tools, which we strategically position and
maintain to maximize availability and minimize cost, supports
our equipment fleet. We also own fabrication facilities in
Canada and the United States. As an adjunct to all our
resources, we also provide specialty services.
Our engineering services include, among others:
|
|
Ø
|
project management;
|
|
Ø
|
feasibility studies;
|
|
Ø
|
conceptual engineering and detailed design;
|
|
Ø
|
route/site selection;
|
|
Ø
|
construction management;
|
|
Ø
|
material procurement;
|
|
Ø
|
commissioning/startup assistance; and
|
|
Ø
|
facilities operations.
|
We provide our engineering services through engineering
resources located in Salt Lake City (Murray), Utah, Tulsa,
Oklahoma and Kansas City, Missouri.
To complement our engineering services, we also provide a full
range of field services, including:
|
|
Ø
|
surveying;
|
|
Ø
|
right of way acquisition;
|
|
Ø
|
material receiving and control;
|
|
Ø
|
construction management;
|
|
Ø
|
facilities startup assistance; and
|
|
Ø
|
operation of facilities.
|
S-69
Business
Our construction services include:
|
|
Ø
|
cross-country onshore pipelines;
|
|
Ø
|
pump, compressor and flow stations;
|
|
Ø
|
fabrication;
|
|
Ø
|
highway, rail and river crossings;
|
|
Ø
|
valve stations;
|
|
Ø
|
pipeline rehabilitation and requalification;
|
|
Ø
|
gas processing plants;
|
|
Ø
|
production facilities; and
|
|
Ø
|
specialty services.
|
Our EPC services include engineering, procurement, construction
and project management resources to work with clients to provide
total project solutions, which optimize project scope, schedule
and deliverables to meet project objectives. We provide the
project deliverables through our own resources or through
selected subcontractors.
Through our engineering and construction resources, we provide
certain specialty services, including, among others:
|
|
Ø
|
pipe double jointing;
|
|
Ø
|
transport of dry and liquid cargo;
|
|
Ø
|
rig moves;
|
|
Ø
|
maintenance and repair services;
|
|
Ø
|
operation and development of facilities; and
|
|
Ø
|
building, owning and operating military fueling facilities.
|
We maintain a staff of experienced management, construction,
engineering and support personnel for providing project
management, engineering, procurement and construction services
worldwide. We provide engineering services through offices
located in Tulsa, Oklahoma, Salt Lake City (Murray), Utah and
Kansas City, Missouri. Construction operations based in Houston,
Texas provide the majority of construction services in the
United States, and country operations in Canada provide services
for oil sands maintenance, construction and fabrication and
cross-country pipeline construction. EPC services presently are
provided from offices in Tulsa, Oklahoma and can also be based
in the most appropriate location for a specific project.
We have a rich history that traces back to the early days of the
oil and gas infrastructure business in the United States and
abroad in the early 1900s. We trace our roots to the original
construction business of Williams Brothers Company, which was
founded in 1908. Through successors to that business, we have
completed many of the landmark pipeline construction projects
around the world, including the Big Inch and
Little Big Inch War Emergency Pipelines
(1942-44),
the
Mid-America
Pipeline (1960), the TransNiger Pipeline
(1962-64),
the Trans-Ecuadorian Pipeline
(1970-72),
the northernmost portion of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System
(1974-76),
the
All-American
Pipeline System
(1984-86),
Colombias Alto Magdalena Pipeline System
(1989-90), a
portion of the Pacific Gas Transmission System expansion
(1992-93),
and through a joint venture led by a subsidiary of ours, the
Chad-Cameroon Pipeline
(2000-03).
Since the early 1900s, we have been employed by more than 400
clients to carry out work in 59 countries. Within the past
10 years, we have worked in Africa, Asia, Australia, the Middle
East,
S-70
Business
North America and South America. We have constructed over
200,000 kilometers of hydrocarbon pipelines, which we believe
positions us in the top tier of pipeline contractors in the
world. We have historically had a steady base of operations in
the United States, Canada, Nigeria, Oman, and Venezuela, which
has been complemented by major projects in Australia, Bolivia,
Cameroon, Chad, Colombia, Ecuador, Egypt, Gabon, Indonesia,
Ivory Coast, Kuwait, Mexico and Pakistan. In 2006, we sold our
interest in Venezuela and exited Bolivia and Ecuador in response
to market conditions which we believe are unfavorable and will
not attract capital to these markets for the types of projects
we perform. In early 2007, we sold our interests in Nigeria in
order to shed risk and redeploy resources into more favorable
markets, primarily in the United States and Canada.
Private sector clients have historically accounted for the
majority of our revenue. Government entities and agencies have
accounted for the remainder. Our top three clients were
responsible for 51.6 percent of our backlog at
September 30, 2007.
Corporate
structure
We are incorporated in the Republic of Panama and maintain our
headquarters at Plaza 2000 Building, 50th Street,
8th Floor,
P.O. Box 0816-01098,
Panama, Republic of Panama; our telephone number is
+50-7-213-0947. Panamas General Corporation Law is
substantially modeled on the New York and Delaware corporate
laws as they existed in 1932. Panama does not tax income derived
from activities conducted outside Panama. The principal
subsidiaries of Willbros Group, Inc. are Willbros International,
Inc. and Willbros USA, Inc.
At the beginning of 2004, 100 percent ownership of the
Willbros RPI, Inc. and Willbros Mt. West, Inc. subsidiaries was
transferred to Willbros USA, Inc. Willbros USA, Inc. now owns
all US subsidiaries of Willbros Group, Inc.
All significant operations in North America are carried out by
material direct or indirect subsidiaries of Willbros Group, Inc.
Such material subsidiaries include:
|
|
Ø
|
Willbros RPI, Inc.;
|
|
Ø
|
Willbros Construction Services (Canada) L.P.;
|
|
Ø
|
Willbros Engineers, Inc.;
|
|
Ø
|
Willbros Project Services, Inc.;
|
|
Ø
|
Willbros Midwest Pipeline Construction (Canada) L.P.;
|
|
Ø
|
Willbros Midstream Services LLC; and
|
|
Ø
|
Willbros Government Services, Inc.
|
All other significant operations are carried out by material
direct or indirect subsidiaries of Willbros International, Inc.,
which is also a Panamanian corporation. Such material
subsidiaries included in 2006:
|
|
Ø
|
Willbros Middle East, Inc.; and
|
|
Ø
|
The Oman Construction Company LLC.
|
In October 2006, we sold the Venezuela businesses, which
included Constructora CAMSA, C.A.
In February 2007, we sold our interests in Nigeria, which
included:
|
|
Ø
|
Willbros West Africa, Inc.;
|
|
Ø
|
Willbros (Nigeria) Limited; and
|
|
Ø
|
Willbros (Offshore) Nigeria Limited.
|
S-71
Business
The Willbros corporate structure is designed to comply with
jurisdictional and registration requirements associated with
work bid and performed and to reduce worldwide taxation of
operating income. Additional subsidiaries may be formed in
specific work countries where necessary or useful for compliance
with local laws or tax objectives. Administrative services are
provided by Willbros USA, Inc., whose administrative
headquarters are located at 4400 Post Oak Parkway,
Suite 1000, Houston, Texas 77027, telephone number
(713) 403-8000.
CURRENT MARKET
CONDITIONS
We believe our existing end markets are in the midst of a
prolonged period of significant growth. A February 2007
Oil & Gas Journal survey indicates
approximately 67,000 miles of new pipeline are proposed to
be placed in service globally over the next decade, with North
America representing the largest opportunity with over
26,000 miles of planned pipeline construction. Based on
data from Douglas-Westwood, an industry consultant, this
infrastructure build-out is estimated to require expenditures of
approximately $180 billion globally with approximately
$43 billion of that amount to be dedicated to North America
over the period from 2008 to 2012. We believe that the North
American energy infrastructure market is poised for a multi-year
expansion, driven by the need to replace and upgrade an aging
infrastructure as well as develop additional infrastructure to
bring energy from new sources to market. The rapid development
of new energy supplies in the Canadian oil sands and new basins
in the United States, such as the Rocky Mountains, the Barnett
Shale and the Fayetteville Shale, requires transportation
resources not addressed by existing infrastructure. For example,
according to the National Energy Board (Canada), capital
expenditures on new bitumen production and processing facilities
are expected to exceed Cdn$100 billion through 2015. We
believe these strong industry fundamentals will contribute to
continued strong demand for our services in the future as
synthetic crude oil production levels are expected to triple
over the same time frame. This processing capacity expansion
will in turn require significant investment in energy
transportation infrastructure.
As of October 14, 2007, we have identified over
$12.4 billion in qualified prospects in North America and
other select international locations, including
$3.0 billion of projects for which we either have bids
pending or in preparation. We are currently deploying the
majority of our resources to North America due to the
significant opportunity and favorable risk-adjusted return
profile of this region. In July 2007, we acquired Midwest
Management (1987) Ltd. (Midwest), expanding our
existing capabilities in the attractive Canadian market with
cross-country pipeline construction services. In addition, we
also expect that the international markets will continue to
offer attractive opportunities as new energy infrastructure
developments are contemplated in North Africa (Algeria and
Libya) and the Middle East (Oman, Saudi Arabia and the United
Arab Emirates). We have a successful history of operating in
these regions, which we believe represent favorable markets to
pursue due to their growth prospects and relative stability. We
believe we are also well-positioned to take advantage of
additional international opportunities when they present a
compelling risk-adjusted return comparable to that of the North
American market.
Given our strong reputation in the industry and favorable
competitive environment, we have been successful in driving
significant backlog growth primarily consisting of negotiated
contracts, which typically carry more favorable terms compared
to competitively bid contracts. We have booked a near record
backlog in North America, which we believe is currently one of
the most attractive markets in the world for our services. As of
September 30, 2007, our backlog for continuing operations
of $1.1 billion represented an increase of
82.5 percent as compared to December 31, 2006. We have
also successfully re-balanced our contract portfolio during the
first nine months of 2007 to lower-risk cost-reimbursable work,
which represents 75 percent of backlog at
September 30, 2007 versus 45 percent at
December 31, 2006. New orders taken, net of cancellations,
in the first nine months of 2007 of
S-72
Business
$1.1 billion represented an increase of 27 percent
over the prior year period, and include significant construction
projects such as the SouthEast Supply Header project for Spectra
Energy, the Mid-Continent Express Project for Kinder Morgan and
the Ft. McMurray Area pipeline project for TransCanada, the
first major pipeline construction contract awarded to our
Midwest business since it was acquired in July 2007.
With the sale of our Nigerian business in February 2007, we
exited all international markets with a significantly elevated
risk profile. In doing so, we redeployed approximately
$40.0 million of the sale proceeds to focus on the more
attractive market in North America. Our ongoing discussions with
potential customers regarding pipeline and station construction
projects in North America and recent contract awards, coupled
with the increase in engineering engagements, reinforce our
belief that our ability to obtain improved terms and conditions
and better pricing will continue throughout the next several
years.
Partially offsetting these positive factors is the potential for
political and social unrest in some countries of interest to us
and the movement toward more populist programs, which have the
effect of diminishing access to capital for projects. We view
these markets as having limited opportunities in the near term.
Price escalations for equipment, labor, fuel and permanent
materials, and shortages of qualified technical and field
personnel required to complete many proposed projects may impact
project economics and schedules, resulting in delays and
possible cancellation of some proposed projects.
OUR BUSINESS
STRATEGY
Our strategy is to increase stockholder value by leveraging our
competitive strengths to take advantage of the current
opportunities in the global energy infrastructure market and
position ourselves for sustained long-term growth. Core tenets
of our strategy include:
Focus on managing risk. Led by our new
management team, we have implemented a core set of business
conduct, practices and policies which have fundamentally
improved our risk profile. We have implemented our risk
management policy by exiting higher risk countries, increasing
our activity levels in lower risk countries, diversifying our
service offerings and end markets, practicing rigorous financial
management and limiting contract execution risk. Risk management
is emphasized throughout all levels of the organization and
covers all aspects of a project from strategic planning and
bidding to contract management and financial reporting. We have
implemented stricter controls and enhanced risk assessment and
believe these processes will enable us to more effectively
evaluate, structure and execute future projects, thereby
increasing our profitability and reducing our execution risk.
|
|
Ø
|
Focus resources in markets with the highest risk-adjusted
return. North America currently offers us the
highest risk-adjusted returns and the majority of our resources
are focused on this region. However, we continue to seek
international opportunities which can provide superior
risk-adjusted returns and believe our extensive international
experience is a competitive advantage. We believe that markets
in North Africa and the Middle East, where we also have
substantial experience may offer attractive opportunities for us
in the future given mid- and long-term industry trends.
|
|
Ø
|
Maintain a conservative contract
portfolio. Our current contract portfolio is
composed of 75 percent cost-reimbursable work which
provides for a more equitable allocation of risk between us and
our customers. While strong current market conditions have been
beneficial in transitioning our backlog away from higher-risk,
fixed-price contracts, we intend to maintain a balanced
risk-to-reward portfolio.
|
|
Ø
|
Ethical business practices. We demand that all
of our employees and representatives conduct our business in
accordance with the highest ethical standardsin compliance
with applicable laws, rules
|
S-73
Business
|
|
|
and regulations, with honesty and integrity, and in a manner
which demonstrates respect for others. The Willbros tradition of
doing the right thing and abiding by the rule of law
is reflected in our longstanding Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics.
|
Leverage core service expertise into additional full EPC
contracts. Our core expertise and service
offerings allow us to provide our customers with a single source
EPC solution which creates greater efficiencies to the benefit
of both our customers and our company. In performing integrated
EPC contracts, we establish ourselves as overall project
managers from the earliest stages of project inception and are
therefore better able to efficiently determine the design,
permitting, procurement and construction sequence for a project
in connection with making engineering decisions. Our customers
benefit from a more seamless execution, while for us, these
contracts often yield higher profit margins on the engineering
and construction components of the contract compared to
stand-alone contracts for similar services. Additionally, this
contract structure allows us to deploy our resources more
efficiently and capture both the engineering and construction
components of these projects.
Leverage core capabilities and industry reputation into a
broader service offering. We believe our
market is characterized by increasingly larger projects and a
constrained resource base. Potential customers are invoking
buying criteria other than price, such as safety performance,
schedule certainty and specialty expertise. Our established
platform and track record strongly position us to capitalize on
this trend by leveraging our expertise into a broader range of
related service offerings. While we currently provide a number
of discrete services to both our core and other end-markets, we
believe additional opportunities exist to expand our core
capabilities through both acquisitions and internal growth
initiatives. We strive to leverage our project management,
engineering and construction skills to establish additional
service offerings, such as instrumentation and electrical
services, turbo-machinery services, environmental services and
pipeline system integrity services. We expect this approach to
enable us to attract more critical service resources in a tight
market for both qualified personnel and critical equipment
resources, establishing us as one of the few contractors able to
do so.
Establish and maintain financial
flexibility. Increasingly larger projects and
the complex interaction of multiple projects simultaneously
underway require us to have the financial flexibility to meet
material, equipment and personnel needs to support our project
commitments. We intend to use our credit facility for
performance letters of credit, financial letters of credit and
cash borrowings. Following the successful completion of this
transaction, we will focus on maintaining a strong balance sheet
to enable us to achieve the best terms and conditions for our
credit facilities and bonding capacities. Our continued emphasis
is on the maintenance of a strong balance sheet to maximize
flexibility and liquidity for the development and growth of our
business. We also employ rigorous cash management processes to
ensure the continued improvement of cash management, including
processes focused on improving contract terms as they relate to
project cash flows.
WILLBROS
BACKGROUND
We are the successor to the pipeline construction business of
Williams Brothers Company, which was started in 1908 by Miller
and David Williams. In 1949, the business was reconstituted and
acquired by the next generation of the Williams family. The
resulting enterprise eventually became The Williams Companies,
Inc., a major US energy and interstate natural gas and
petroleum products transportation company (Williams).
In 1975, Williams elected to discontinue its pipeline
construction activities and, in December 1975, sold
substantially all of the
non-US assets
and international entities comprising its pipeline construction
division to a newly formed, independently owned Panama
corporation. The new company (eventually renamed Willbros Group,
Inc.) implemented a new management structure and commenced a new
era in the Companys history. In 1979, Willbros Group, Inc.
retired its debt incurred in the acquisition by
S-74
Business
selling a 60 percent equity interest to Heerema Holding
Construction, Inc. (Heerema). In 1986, Heerema
acquired the balance of Willbros Group, Inc., which then
operated as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Heerema until April
1992.
In April 1992, Heerema sold Willbros Group, Inc. to a
corporation formed on December 31, 1991 in the Republic of
Panama by members of Willbros Group, Inc.s management at
the time, certain other investors, and Heerema. Subsequently,
the original Willbros Group, Inc. was dissolved into the
acquiring corporation which was renamed Willbros Group,
Inc. In August 1996, we completed an initial public
offering of common stock in which Heerema sold all of its shares
of common stock; and in October 1997, we completed a
secondary offering in which the other investors sold
substantially all of their shares of common stock. In May 2002,
we completed a third public offering of common stock, which was
used to repay debt and to provide cash for general corporate
purposes. In October 2006, we completed a private placement of
common stock to raise additional capital to fund rapidly growing
operations in North America and to be used for general corporate
purposes.
Willbros
milestones
The following are selected milestones which we have achieved:
|
|
|
1908
|
|
Williams Brothers began family business.
|
1915
|
|
Began pipeline work in the United States.
|
1923
|
|
First project outside the United States performed in Canada.
|
1939
|
|
Began pipeline work in Venezuela, first project outside North
America.
|
1942-44
|
|
Served as principal contractor on the Big Inch and
Little Big Inch War Emergency Pipelines in the
United States which delivered Gulf Coast crude oil to the
Eastern Seaboard.
|
1947-48
|
|
Built the 370-mile (600-kilometer) Camiri to Sucre and
Cochabamba crude oil pipeline in Bolivia.
|
1951
|
|
Completed the 400-mile (645-kilometer) western segment of the
Trans-Arabian Pipeline System in Jordan, Syria and Lebanon.
|
1954-55
|
|
Built Alaskas first major pipeline system, consisting of
625 miles (1,000 kilometers) of petroleum products
pipeline, housing, communications, two tank farms, five pump
stations, and marine dock and loading facilities.
|
1956-57
|
|
Led a joint venture which constructed the 335-mile
(535-kilometer) southern section of the Trans-Iranian Pipeline,
a products pipeline system extending from Abadan to Tehran.
|
1958
|
|
Constructed pipelines and related facilities for the
worlds largest oil export terminal at Kharg Island, Iran.
|
1960
|
|
Built the first major liquefied petroleum gas pipeline system,
the 2,175-mile (3,480-kilometer) Mid-America Pipeline in the
United States, including six delivery terminals, two operating
terminals, 13 pump stations, communications and cavern storage.
|
1962
|
|
Began operations in Nigeria with the commencement of
construction of the TransNiger Pipeline, a 170-mile
(275-kilometer) crude oil pipeline.
|
1964-65
|
|
Built the 390-mile (625-kilometer) Santa Cruz to Sica Sica crude
oil pipeline in Bolivia. The highest altitude reached by this
line is 14,760 feet (4,500 meters) above sea level, which
management believes is higher than the altitude of any other
pipeline in the world.
|
1965
|
|
Began operations in Oman with the commencement of construction
of the 175-mile (280-kilometer) Fahud to Muscat crude oil
pipeline system.
|
S-75
Business
|
|
|
1967-68
|
|
Built the 190-mile (310-kilometer) Orito to Tumaco crude oil
pipeline in Colombia, one of five Willbros crossings of the
Andes Mountains, a project notable for the use of helicopters in
high-altitude construction.
|
1969
|
|
Completed a gas gathering system and 105 miles (170
kilometers) of 42-inch trunkline for the Iranian Gas Trunkline
Project (IGAT) in Iran to supply gas to the USSR.
|
1970-72
|
|
Built the Trans-Ecuadorian Pipeline, crossing the Andes
Mountains, consisting of 315 miles (505 kilometers) of
20-inch and 26-inch pipeline, seven pump stations, four
pressure-reducing stations and six storage tanks. Considered the
most logistically difficult pipeline project ever completed at
the time.
|
1974-76
|
|
Led a joint venture which built the northernmost 225 miles
(365 kilometers) of the Trans Alaska Pipeline System.
|
1974-76
|
|
Led a joint venture which constructed 290 miles (465
kilometers) of pipeline and two pump stations in the difficult
to access western Amazon basin of Peru; another logistics
challenge which required lightering from shipping on the Amazon
River.
|
1974-79
|
|
Designed and engineered the 500-mile (795-kilometer)
Sarakhs-Neka gas transmission line in northeastern Iran.
|
1982-83
|
|
Built the Cortez carbon dioxide pipeline system in the
southwestern United States, consisting of 505 miles (815
kilometers) of 30-inch pipeline.
|
1984-86
|
|
Constructed, through a joint venture, the All-American Pipeline
System, a 1,240-mile
(1,995-kilometer),
30-inch heated pipeline, including 23 pump stations, in the
United States.
|
1984-95
|
|
Developed and furnished a rapid deployment fuel pipeline
distribution and storage system for the U.S. Army which was used
extensively and successfully in Saudi Arabia during Operation
Desert Shield/Desert Storm in 1990/1991, in Somalia during 1993
and in Iraq in 2003.
|
1985-86
|
|
Built a 185-mile (300-kilometer), 24-inch crude oil pipeline
from Ayacucho to Covenas in Colombia, another Andean challenge.
|
1987
|
|
Rebuilt 25 miles (40 kilometers) of the Trans-Ecuadorian
crude oil pipeline, mobilizing to Ecuador in two weeks and
completing work within six months after major portions were
destroyed by an earthquake.
|
1988-92
|
|
Performed project management, engineering, procurement and field
support services to expand the Great Lakes Gas Transmission
System in the northern United States. The expansion involved
modifications to 13 compressor stations and the addition of
660 miles (1,060 kilometers) of 36-inch pipeline in 50
separate loops.
|
1989-92
|
|
Provided pipeline engineering and field support services for the
Kern River Gas Transmission System, a 36-inch pipeline project
extending over 685 miles (1,100 kilometers) of desert and
mountains from Wyoming to California.
|
1992-93
|
|
Rebuilt oil field gathering systems in Kuwait as part of the
post-war reconstruction effort.
|
1996
|
|
Listed shares upon completion of an initial public offering of
common stock on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol WG.
|
1996-97
|
|
Achieved ISO Certification for seven operating companies.
|
1996-98
|
|
Performed an EPC contract with Asamera (Overseas) Limited to
design and construct pipelines, flowlines and related facilities
for the Corridor Block Gas Project located in southern Sumatra,
Indonesia.
|
1997-98
|
|
Carried out a contract for the construction of 120 miles
(200 kilometers) each of 36-inch and 20-inch pipelines in the
Zuata Region of the Orinoco Belt in Venezuela.
|
S-76
Business
|
|
|
1997-98
|
|
Completed an EPC contract for El Paso Natural Gas Company
and Gasoductos de Chihuahua, a joint venture between
El Paso and PEMEX, to construct a 45-mile
(75-kilometer)
gas pipeline system in Texas and Mexico.
|
1999-00
|
|
Carried out a contract through a joint venture to construct a
492-mile (792-kilometer),
18-inch gas
pipeline in Australia.
|
2000
|
|
Acquired Rogers & Phillips, Inc., a United States pipeline
construction company.
|
2000
|
|
Relocated the Willbros USA, Inc. administrative offices from
Tulsa, Oklahoma to Houston, Texas.
|
2001
|
|
Acquired MSI Energy Services Inc., an Alberta, Canada based
contractor working in the oil sands area, and established a
presence in Canada.
|
2001
|
|
Ended year with record backlog of $407.6 million.
|
2002
|
|
Acquired the Mt. West Group to enhance presence in the western
United States and to improve our service capabilities worldwide.
|
2002
|
|
Completed engineering and project management of the Gulfstream
project, a $1.6 billion natural gas pipeline system from Mobile,
Alabama crossing the Gulf of Mexico and serving markets in
central and southern Florida.
|
2002
|
|
Elected Michael F. Curran CEO, succeeding Larry J. Bump, who
retired after 22 years as CEO.
|
2002
|
|
Completed the Centennial Pipeline Project: FERC application
support, engineering, procurement, construction and construction
management of new-build and conversion to refined products
service of a natural gas system from Gulf Coast to mid-western
United States, 797 miles (1,275 kilometers) of 24-inch
and 26-inch pipelines and facilities.
|
2003
|
|
Completed work on the Explorer Pipeline Mainline expansion
project, adding 12 new pump stations and additional storage to
this products pipeline from the Gulf Coast to central Illinois.
|
2003
|
|
Completed an EPC contract for the 665-mile (1,070-kilometer),
30-inch crude oil ChadCameroon Pipeline Project, through a
joint venture with another international contractor.
|
2003
|
|
Completed construction of the GASYRG natural gas pipeline in
Bolivia, 144 miles (230 kilometers) of 32-inch
pipeline from the San Alberto gas field to connect with
export facilities to Brazil.
|
2004
|
|
Completed construction and began commercial operation of the
Opal Gas Plant with nominal capacity of 350 million standard
cubic feet per day.
|
2004
|
|
Awarded the contract for the onshore portions of the West Africa
Gas Pipeline project, to transport natural gas from Nigeria to
end users in Ghana, Togo and Benin.
|
2004
|
|
Completed pipeline rehabilitation and replacement project in
Iraq.
|
2006
|
|
Expanded activities in Canada to include maintenance, small
capital construction and modular fabrication for oil sands
developments.
|
2006
|
|
Awarded the R1-R2 pump house construction contract for CNRL
Horizon project, first $50 million plus contract in Canada.
|
2006
|
|
Placed Nigeria interests up for sale and reclassified them as
discontinued.
|
2006
|
|
Ended year with record North American backlog of $565.4 million.
|
2006
|
|
Elected Robert R. Harl CEO, succeeding Michael F. Curran.
|
2007
|
|
Completed sale of Nigerian interests in February 2007.
|
S-77
Business
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Acquired Midwest Pipeline Construction in Canada, establishing
cross-country pipeline capability in Canadian market.
|
2007
|
|
Agreed to acquire InServ for $225 million.
|
BUSINESS
SEGMENTS
In 2007, we restructured our business into three operating
segments: Engineering, Construction and EPC. All periods
presented reflect this change in segments.
Our segments are strategic business units that are managed
separately as each has different operational requirements and
marketing strategies. The Engineering segment consists of all
professional project management, engineering and design
services. The Construction segment consists of all construction,
fabrication and specialty services provided worldwide and the
EPC segment consists of those services performed under a project
structure which includes project management, engineering,
procurement and construction services under a single contract.
Our corporate operations include the general and administrative
and financing functions of the organization. The costs of these
functions are allocated between the three operating segments.
Our corporate operations also include various other assets some
of which are allocated between the three operating segments.
Inter-segment revenue and revenue between geographic areas are
not material.
SERVICES
PROVIDED
We provide engineering, construction, and EPC services,
including development activities. We also have experience in the
operation of the types of facilities we design and build. We may
make equity investments in some projects to enhance our
competitive position for the work assignments associated with
the project. In other instances, our experience enables us to
understand and manage project completion risk and in these cases
we may elect to develop and own a complete facility which will
provide attractive internal rates of return over an extended
period of time.
Our continuing operations contract revenue for 2006 and 2005 for
the Engineering, Construction and EPC operating segments are
shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
change
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
214,020
|
|
|
$
|
421,270
|
|
|
$
|
207,250
|
|
|
|
96.8
|
%
|
Engineering
|
|
|
43,194
|
|
|
|
75,833
|
|
|
|
32,639
|
|
|
|
75.6
|
%
|
EPC
|
|
|
37,265
|
|
|
|
46,156
|
|
|
|
8,891
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contract revenue
|
|
$
|
294,479
|
|
|
$
|
543,259
|
|
|
$
|
248,780
|
|
|
|
84.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering
services
We provide project management, engineering, and material
procurement services to the oil, gas and power industries and
government agencies. We specialize in providing engineering
services to assist clients in constructing or expanding pipeline
systems, compressor stations, pump stations, fuel storage
facilities, and field gathering and production facilities. Over
the years, we have developed expertise in addressing the unique
engineering challenges involved with pipeline systems and
associated facilities.
To complement our engineering services, we also provide a full
range of field services, including:
S-78
Business
|
|
Ø
|
right-of-way acquisition;
|
|
Ø
|
material receiving and control;
|
|
Ø
|
construction inspection;
|
|
Ø
|
facilities startup assistance; and
|
|
Ø
|
facilities operations.
|
These services are furnished to a number of oil, gas, power and
government clients on a stand-alone basis and are also provided
as part of EPC contracts undertaken by us.
Prior to awarding a project to us, our customers closely
evaluate our experience and capabilities with respect to the
project requirements. Some of those requirements involve:
Climatic
constraints
In the design of pipelines and associated facilities to be
installed in harsh environments, special provisions for
metallurgy of materials and foundation design must be addressed.
We are experienced in designing pipelines for arctic conditions
(where permafrost and extremely low temperatures are prevalent),
desert conditions, mountainous terrain, swamps and offshore.
Environmental
impact of river crossings/wetlands
We have considerable capability in designing pipeline crossings
of rivers, streams and wetlands in such a way as to minimize
environmental impact. We possess expertise to determine the
optimal crossing techniques, such as open cut,
directionally-drilled or overhead, and to develop site-specific
construction methods to minimize bank erosion, sedimentation and
other environmental impacts.
Seismic design
and stress analysis
Our engineers are experienced in seismic design of pipeline
crossings of active faults and areas where liquefaction or slope
instability may occur due to seismic events. Our engineers also
carry out specialized stress analyses of piping systems that are
subjected to expansion and contraction due to temperature
changes, as well as loads from equipment and other sources.
Hazardous
materials
Special care must be taken in the design of pipeline systems
transporting sour gas. Sour gas not only presents challenges
regarding personnel safety since hydrogen sulfide leaks can be
extremely hazardous, but also requires that material be
specified to withstand highly corrosive conditions. Our
engineers have extensive natural gas experience which includes
design of sour gas systems.
Hydraulics
analysis for fluid flow in piping systems
We employ engineers with the specialized knowledge necessary to
address properly the effects of both steady state and transient
flow conditions for a wide variety of fluids transported by
pipelines, including natural gas, crude oil, refined petroleum
products, natural gas liquids, carbon dioxide and water. This
expertise is important in optimizing the capital costs of
pipeline projects where pipe material costs typically represent
a significant portion of total project capital costs.
S-79
Business
We have developed significant expertise with respect to each of
the following:
Natural gas
transmission systems
The expansion of the natural gas transportation network in the
United States in recent years has been a major contributor to
our engineering business. We believe we have established a
strong position as a leading supplier of project management and
engineering services to natural gas pipeline transmission
companies in the United States. Since 1988, we have provided
engineering services for over 20 major natural gas projects in
the United States, including the Gulfstream Natural Gas System
project, completed in 2002, and the Guardian Pipeline Project,
both Phase I, completed in 2004 and Phase II currently
underway.
Liquids pipelines
and storage facility design
We have engineered a number of crude oil and refined petroleum
products systems throughout the world, and have become
recognized for our expertise in the engineering of systems for
the storage and transportation of petroleum products and crude
oil. In 2001, we provided engineering and field services for
conversion of a natural gas system in the mid-western United
States, involving over 797 miles (1,275 kilometers) of
24-inch to
26-inch
diameter pipeline to serve the upper Midwest with refined
petroleum products. In 2003, we completed EPC services for the
expansion of another petroleum products pipeline to the Midwest
involving 12 new pump stations, modifications to another 13 pump
stations and additional storage.
U.S. government
services
Since 1981, we have established our position with
US government agencies as a leading engineering contractor
for jet fuel storage as well as aircraft fueling facilities,
having performed the engineering for major projects at eight
US military bases including three air bases outside the
United States. The award of these projects was based largely on
contractor experience and personnel qualifications. Also, in the
past eight years we have won five of 10 so-called
Design-Build-Own-Operate-Maintain projects to
provide fueling facilities at military bases in the United
States for the US Defense Energy Support Center.
Design of
peripheral systems
Our expertise extends to the engineering of a wide range of
project peripherals, including various types of support
buildings and utility systems, power generation and electrical
transmission, communications systems, fire protection, water and
sewage treatment, water transmission, roads and railroad sidings.
Material
procurement
Because material procurement plays such a critical part in the
success of any project, we maintain an experienced staff to
carry out material procurement activities. Material procurement
services are provided to clients as a complement to the
engineering services performed for a project. Material
procurement is especially critical to the timely completion of
construction on the EPC contracts we undertake. We maintain a
computer-based material procurement, tracking and control
system, which utilizes software enhanced to meet our specific
requirements.
Construction
services
We are one of the most experienced contractors serving the oil,
gas and power industries. Our construction capabilities include
the expertise to construct and replace large-diameter
cross-country pipelines; to fabricate engineered structures,
process modules and facilities; and to construct oil and gas
S-80
Business
production facilities, pump stations, flow stations, gas
compressor stations, gas processing facilities and other related
facilities.
Pipeline
construction
World demand for pipelines results from the need to move
millions of barrels of crude oil and petroleum products and
billions of cubic feet of natural gas to refiners, processors
and consumers each day. Pipeline construction is
capital-intensive, and we own, lease, operate and maintain a
fleet of specialized equipment necessary for operations in the
pipeline construction business. We focus on large-diameter
cross-country pipeline construction activity in areas where we
believe our experience gives us a competitive advantage. We
believe that, having executed over 200,000 kilometers of
hydrocarbon pipelines places us in the top tier of pipeline
contractors in the world. Since 2004, we have developed the
expertise to employ automatic welding processes in the onshore
construction of large-diameter (greater than
30-inch)
natural gas pipelines and have constructed over 210 miles
of such pipelines using automatic welding processes in the
Barnett Shale region of the southwestern United States.
The construction of a cross-country pipeline involves a number
of sequential operations along the designated pipeline
right-of-way. These operations are virtually the same for all
overland pipelines, but personnel and equipment may vary widely
depending upon such factors as the time required for completion,
general climatic conditions, seasonal weather patterns, the
number of road crossings, the number and size of river
crossings, terrain considerations, extent of rock formations,
density of heavy timber and amount of swamp.
Onshore construction often involves separate crews to perform
the following different functions:
|
|
Ø
|
clear the right-of-way;
|
|
Ø
|
grade the right-of-way;
|
|
Ø
|
excavate a trench in which to bury the pipe;
|
|
Ø
|
haul pipe to intermediate stockpiles from which stringing trucks
carry pipe and place individual lengths (joints) of pipe
alongside the ditch;
|
|
Ø
|
bend pipe joints to conform to changes of direction and
elevation;
|
|
Ø
|
clean pipe ends and line up the succeeding joint;
|
|
Ø
|
perform various welding operations;
|
|
Ø
|
inspect welds non-destructively;
|
|
Ø
|
clean pipe and apply anti-corrosion coatings;
|
|
Ø
|
lower pipe into the ditch;
|
|
Ø
|
backfill the ditch;
|
|
Ø
|
bore and install highway and railroad crossings;
|
|
Ø
|
drill, excavate or dredge and install pipeline river crossings;
|
|
Ø
|
tie in all crossings to the pipeline;
|
|
Ø
|
install mainline valve stations;
|
|
Ø
|
conduct pressure testing;
|
|
Ø
|
install cathodic protection system; and
|
|
Ø
|
perform final clean up.
|
Special equipment and techniques are required to construct
pipelines across wetlands and offshore. In the past, we have
used swamp pipelaying methods extensively in Nigeria, where a
significant portion of
S-81
Business
our construction operations had been carried out in the Niger
River Delta. This expertise is applicable in wetland regions
elsewhere and can provide a competitive advantage for projects
in such venues as south Louisiana, where we expect to see
additional work opportunities.
Fabrication
Fabrication services can be a more efficient means of delivering
engineered, major process or production equipment with improved
schedule certainty and quality. We provide fabrication services
and are capable of fabricating such diverse deliverables as
process modules, pipeline station headers, flare piles and tips.
Our subsidiary Willbros Construction Services (Canada) L.P.
(Willbros Canada) purchased in 2005 an additional
90,000 square foot fabrication facility in Edmonton,
Canada. This facility has expanded Willbros Canadas
fabrication capability to provide process modules to the
burgeoning heavy oil market in northern Alberta. Including the
new facility in Edmonton, Willbros Canada currently operates
three fabrication facilities in Ft. McMurray and Edmonton,
Canada.
Station
construction
Oil and gas companies require various facilities in the course
of producing, processing, storing and moving oil and gas. We are
experienced in and capable of constructing facilities such as
pump stations, flow stations, gas processing facilities, gas
compressor stations and metering stations. We can provide a full
range of services for the engineering, design, procurement and
construction of processing, pumping, compression, and metering
facilities. We are capable of building such facilities onshore,
offshore in shallow water or in swamp locations. The
construction of station facilities, while not as
capital-intensive as pipeline construction, is generally
characterized by complex logistics and scheduling, particularly
on projects in locations where seasonal weather patterns limit
construction options, and in countries where the importation
process is difficult. Our capabilities have been enhanced by our
experience in dealing with such challenges in numerous countries
around the world.
Facilities
development and operations
Our workforce has significant experience in the operation of the
types of facilities we design and build. In some instances, we
make equity investments in projects to enhance our competitive
position for the work assignments associated with the project.
In other instances, our experience enables us to understand and
manage project completion risk, and in these cases we may elect
to develop and own a complete facility which will provide
attractive internal rates of return over an extended period of
time.
Opal gas plant. We designed, built and owned a
turbo-expander plant which processes gas produced from the
Pinedale anticline. The TXP-4 Plant is located near Opal,
Wyoming in southwestern Wyoming and is designed to process
volumes in excess of 350 million standard cubic feet per
day of natural gas, producing 7,000 to 11,000 barrels per
day of natural gas liquids at various operating conditions. The
TXP-4 Plant began commercial natural gas processing activity in
the first quarter of 2004. We sold this facility in January 2006
to Williams Field Services Company, the owner and operator of
the major Opal Plant facilities.
US Defense Energy Support Center. Since
1998, we have constructed five fueling facilities for the
US Defense Energy Support Center. Currently, we own and
operate two fueling facilities at Ft. Bragg, North
Carolina, which were constructed by us in 1998 and a similar
facility completed in 2000 at Twenty-nine Palms Marine Corps
Base in California. In 2001, we were awarded contracts for
similar facilities at Ft. Stewart, Georgia and
Ft. Gordon, Georgia; these facilities were completed and
operational in 2002. In 2005, we were awarded a contract for
another such facility at Ft. Campbell, Kentucky.
S-82
Business
Water injection facility. In 1998, through our
Venezuelan subsidiary, we took a 10 percent equity interest
in a joint venture which was awarded a
16-year
contract to operate, maintain and refurbish water injection
facilities on Lake Maracaibo in Venezuela. This interest was
sold in 2006.
EPC
services
Increased control over all aspects of a project increases
efficiencies for us, often allowing us to generate higher
margins in the engineering and construction portions of the
contract compared to stand-alone contracts for similar services
and to capture incremental revenue and margin opportunities
through material procurement. EPC contracts also enable us to
optimize the overall project solution and execution for our
customers. While EPC contracts carry lower margins for the
procurement component, which can be a significant portion of the
total contract value, we believe the increased control over all
aspects of the project, coupled with higher margins for
engineering and construction portions, makes these types of
contracts attractive to us. We intend to capitalize on being one
of the few pipeline engineering, construction and EPC services
companies worldwide with the ability to provide the full range
of EPC services in order to capture more of this business.
Specialty
services
We utilize the skill sets and resources from our engineering,
construction and EPC services to provide a wide range of support
and ancillary services related to the construction, operation,
repair and rehabilitation of pipelines and other energy
infrastructure. Frequently, such services require the
utilization of specialized equipment, which is costly and
requires operating expertise. Due to the initial equipment cost
and operating expertise required, many client companies hire us
to perform these services. We own and operate a variety of
specialized equipment that is used to support construction
projects and to provide a wide range of oilfield services.
Specialty services enable us to increase our utilization of
equipment and personnel. We provide the following primary types
of specialty services:
|
|
Ø
|
transport of dry and liquid cargo;
|
|
Ø
|
pipe double-jointing;
|
|
Ø
|
rig moves; and
|
|
Ø
|
maintenance and repair services.
|
GEOGRAPHIC
REGIONS
We are currently deploying the majority of our resources to
North America due to the significant opportunity and favorable
risk-adjusted return profile of this region. However, we also
expect the international market will continue to offer
attractive opportunities as new energy infrastructure
developments are contemplated in North Africa and the Middle
East (specifically Oman, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab
Emirates). As a company with a long history operating around the
world, we believe we are also well-positioned to take advantage
of international opportunities when they present a compelling
risk-adjusted return relative to the North American market.
North
America
At September 30, 2007, over 90 percent of our contract
backlog was for projects in North America. We believe that
current market fundamentals indicate that the United States and
Canada will continue to be an important market for our services
in the next three to five years. Market conditions for the
short-term showed improvement in 2006, more improvement in 2007
and are expected to remain strong through 2010 as many of the
energy transportation companies improve their financial
condition and focus on core businesses. To improve their
liquidity, some of our traditional clients sold pipeline assets,
S-83
Business
in some cases, to new industry participants. These new owners
are beginning to develop and implement their capital budgets for
these newly acquired assets, as they have completed their
evaluation of the newly acquired assets and are finalizing their
strategies for maximizing the return on their investments in
these assets.
Deregulation of the electric power and natural gas pipeline
industries in the United States has led to the consolidation and
reconfiguration of existing pipeline infrastructure and the
establishment of new energy transport systems, which we expect
will result in continued demand for our services in the mid-to
long-term. The demand for natural gas for industrial and power
usage in the United States should increase the demand for
additional new natural gas transportation infrastructure. We
anticipate that additional supply to satisfy such market demand
for natural gas will come from existing and new production in
the North Slope of Alaska, the Rocky Mountain region, the Gulf
of Mexico, and newly proposed and permitted liquefied natural
gas (LNG) regasification terminals along the Gulf
Coast. Environmental concerns will likely continue to require
careful, thorough and specialized professional engineering and
planning for all new facilities within the oil, gas and power
sectors. Furthermore, the demand for replacement and
rehabilitation of pipelines is expected to increase as pipeline
systems in the United States approach the end of their design
lives and population trends influence overall energy needs.
Prevailing oil and gas prices at higher than historical averages
have increased industry interest, investment and development in
the oil sands region of northern Alberta, Canada. According to
the National Energy Board of Alberta, Canada, capital
expenditures on new bitumen production and processing facilities
should exceed Cdn$100 billion by the end of 2015, as
production levels triple through 2015. New process plant
developments offer prospective fabrication and installation work
as well as maintenance opportunities, and the anticipated
increase in crude oil volumes to be shipped to markets in the
United States and Asia has resulted in proposals for several
major crude oil export pipelines from this region. The need for
additional process fuel for the oil sands also is driving the
development of new pipeline infrastructure from the Mackenzie
Delta region. Construction, fabrication and maintenance services
in Canada are provided primarily through facilities and
resources located in Ft. McMurray and Edmonton, Alberta. In
early 2005, Willbros Canada purchased a 90,000 square foot
fabrication facility in the Edmonton, Alberta area. This
facility has expanded Willbros Canadas fabrication
capability to provide process modules to the burgeoning heavy
oil market in northern Alberta. In 2006 we were awarded a major
construction project in the Ft. McMurray area, valued in
excess of $50 million, and we are expanding our experience
and capability for such assignments. In 2007, we purchased
Midwest, a cross-country pipeline constructor with a
30-year
history in Canada; this acquisition expanded our capability in
Canada to include mainline pipeline construction in addition to
our oil sands maintenance, construction and fabrication
capabilities.
We have also provided significant engineering services to
US government agencies during the past 24 years,
particularly in fuel storage and distribution systems and
aircraft fueling facilities.
Africa and the
Middle East
We continue to believe that increased exploration and production
activity in the Middle East will be the primary factor
influencing the construction of new energy transportation
systems in the region. The majority of future transportation
projects in the region are expected to be centered around
natural gas due to increased regional demand, governments
recognition of gas as an important asset and an underdeveloped
gas transportation infrastructure throughout the region. In
April 2003, we were awarded an EPC contract for a natural gas
pipeline system in Oman and completed that project in 2004. In
October 2003, we were awarded work as a subcontractor to repair
damaged pipelines in northern Iraq. This work was completed in
late 2004. Projects delayed in the region by uncertainty
associated with the hostilities in Iraq are now being tendered
and awarded. We believe the Middle East
S-84
Business
in general will present opportunities to provide an increased
level of services for the next three to five years.
Our operations in the Middle East date back to 1948. We have
worked in most of the countries in the region, with particularly
heavy involvement in Kuwait, Oman and Saudi Arabia. Currently,
we have ongoing operations in Oman, where we have been active
continuously for more than 40 years. We maintain a fully
staffed facility in Oman with equipment repair facilities and
spare parts on site and offer construction expertise, repair and
maintenance services, engineering support, oil field transport
services, materials procurement and a variety of related
services to our clients. In 2004, we were awarded a new
five-year contract by Oman LNG for general maintenance services.
We believe our presence in Oman and our experience there and in
other Middle Eastern countries will enable us to successfully
win and perform projects in this region. We have evaluated the
opportunities in the Middle East and determined that we
should focus our efforts on continued development of our
operations in Oman and the extension of that expertise and
capability into the markets in the United Arab Emirates and
Saudi Arabia, where we have a joint venture relationship with
the foremost provider of services to Saudi Aramco.
Africa has been an important strategic market for us and may
remain so despite our decision to exit Nigeria in 2006. There
are large, potentially exploitable reserves of natural gas in
North Africa. Depending upon the world market for natural gas
and the availability of financing, the amount of potential new
work could be substantial. Currently, we are monitoring or
bidding on major work prospects in Algeria and Libya.
Over the past 50 years, we have completed major projects in
a number of African countries including Algeria, Cameroon, Chad,
Egypt, Gabon, Ivory Coast, Libya, Morocco and Nigeria. We have
management staff in our organization and engineers, managers and
craftsmen with extensive international and African experience,
who are capable of providing engineering, construction and EPC
expertise, fabrication services and repair and maintenance
services. Project opportunities in countries where we do not
currently have a presence are addressed by project teams
configured and based in the most advantageous location for the
project at hand.
Other
regions
We first provided project work in South America in 1939, where
our accomplishments include the construction of five major
pipeline crossings of the Andes Mountains and the world altitude
record for constructing a pipeline. Most recently, we completed,
in an alliance with another international contractor, a
144-mile
(230-kilometer)
32-inch
natural gas pipeline in Bolivia for the Transierra consortium.
This project was completed in the first half of 2003, and
resolution and settlement of contract variations was finalized
in 2004.
The medium to long-term market outlook has not changed, but in
the short-term, the markets in Bolivia, Ecuador and Venezuela
have been disrupted by a populist political agenda and its
emphasis on state control of natural resources and energy
projects. The political situations in Bolivia, Ecuador and
Venezuela remain uncertain and projects in these countries
continue to be delayed. Because the governments of these
countries continue to pursue an agenda which includes
nationalization
and/or
renegotiation of contracts with foreign investors, we view these
markets as having limited opportunities in the near term.
In 2006 we sold our business interests in Venezuela and our
10 percent interest in a joint venture there.
We also have experience in Southeast Asia and have performed
work in Russia. We do not currently believe these markets are
attractive, but continue to monitor them.
S-85
Business
BACKLOG
In our industry, backlog is considered an indicator of potential
future performance because it represents a portion of the future
revenue stream. Our strategy is not focused solely on backlog
additions but, rather, on capturing quality backlog with margins
commensurate with the risks associated with a given project.
Backlog consists of anticipated revenue from the uncompleted
portions of existing contracts and contracts whose award is
reasonably assured. At September 30, 2007, backlog from
continuing operations was $1.1 billion compared to
$602.3 million on a comparable basis at December 31,
2006. We believe the backlog figures are firm, subject only to
the cancellation and modification provisions contained in
various contracts. Historically, a substantial amount of our
revenue in a given year has not been in our backlog at the
beginning of that year. At the end of 2006, we believe we had an
extraordinary amount of work for 2007 already under contract and
our backlog has risen significantly throughout 2007.
Additionally, due to the short duration of many jobs, revenue
associated with jobs awarded and performed within a reporting
period will not be reflected in quarterly backlog reports. We
expect the amount of such revenue to be less than in previous
years due to the high expected utilization rate for our
resources in 2007 and 2008. We generate revenue from numerous
sources, including contracts of long or short duration entered
into during a year as well as from various contractual
processes, including change orders, extra work, variations in
the scope of work and the effect of escalation or currency
fluctuation formulas. These revenue sources are not added to
backlog until realization is assured.
The following table shows our backlog by operating segment and
geographic region as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 and
September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2005
|
|
|
December 31,
2006
|
|
|
September 30,
2007
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
233,085
|
|
|
|
97.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
320,461
|
|
|
|
53.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
883,365
|
|
|
|
80.4
|
%
|
Engineering
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
92,956
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
%
|
|
|
89,527
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
EPC
|
|
|
7,198
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
188,855
|
|
|
|
31.4
|
%
|
|
|
125,992
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total continuing operations
|
|
|
240,373
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
602,272
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,098,884
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
575,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
406,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total backlog
|
|
$
|
816,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,009,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,098,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPETITION
We operate in a highly competitive environment. We compete
against government-owned or supported companies and other
companies that have financial and other resources substantially
in excess of those available to us. In certain markets, we
compete against national and regional firms against which we may
not be price competitive.
In the United States, our primary construction competitors on a
national basis include Associated Pipeline Contractors,
Gregory & Cook, H. C. Price, Sheehan Pipeline
Construction, U.S. Pipeline and Welded Construction. In
addition, there are a number of regional competitors, such as
Sunland, Dyess, Flint, and Jomax. In Canada, we compete with
firms such as OJ Pipelines, North American Energy, Waschuk, R.
B. Somerville and Bannister for cross-country pipeline
construction contracts. In the Canadian oil sands, competitors
include: Bantrel, Flint Energy Services, Fluor, Ledcor, KBR and
SNC Lavalin.
S-86
Business
Primary competitors for our engineering services include:
|
|
Ø
|
Alliance Engineering;
|
|
Ø
|
Bechtel;
|
|
Ø
|
Worley Parsons;
|
|
Ø
|
Fluor;
|
|
Ø
|
Gulf Interstate;
|
|
Ø
|
Jacobs Engineering;
|
|
Ø
|
KBR;
|
|
Ø
|
Mustang Engineering;
|
|
Ø
|
Paragon Engineering;
|
|
Ø
|
Snamprogetti;
|
|
Ø
|
Technip;
|
|
Ø
|
Trigon EPC; and
|
|
Ø
|
Universal Ensco.
|
Our primary competitors for international onshore construction
projects in developing countries include Technip (France), CCC
(Lebanon), Saipem (Italy), Spie-Capag (France), Techint
(Argentina), Bechtel (U.S.), Stroytransgaz (Russia), Tekfen
(Turkey), and Nacap (Netherlands). We believe that we are one of
the few companies among our competitors possessing the ability
to carry out large projects in developing countries on a turnkey
basis (engineering, procurement and construction), without
subcontracting major elements of the work. As a result, we may
be more cost effective than our competitors in certain instances
or offer a superior value proposition.
We have different competitors in different service markets. In
Oman, competitors in oil field transport services include Desert
Line, Al Ahram, Hamdam and TruckOman, all Omani companies; and
in the construction and installation of flowlines and mechanical
services, we compete with Taylor Woodrow Towell (UK), CCC
(Lebanon), Dodsal (India), Saipem (Italy), Desert Line (Oman)
and Galfar (Oman).
JOINT
VENTURES
From time to time in the ordinary course of our business, we
enter into joint venture agreements with other contractors for
the performance of specific projects. Typically, we seek one or
more joint venture partners when a project requires local
content, equipment, manpower or other resources beyond those we
have available to complete work in a timely and efficient manner
or when we wish to share risk on a particularly large project.
Our joint venture agreements identify the work to be performed
by each party, the procedures for managing the joint venture
work, the manner in which profits and losses will be shared by
the parties, the equipment, personnel or other assets that each
party will make available to the joint venture and the means by
which any disputes will be resolved.
CONTRACT
PROVISIONS AND SUBCONTRACTING
Most of our revenue is derived from engineering, construction
and EPC contracts. The majority of our contracts fall into the
following basic categories:
|
|
Ø
|
firm fixed-price or lump sum fixed-price contracts, providing
for a single price for the total amount of work or for a number
of fixed lump sums for the various work elements comprising the
total price;
|
|
Ø
|
unit-price contracts, which specify a price for each unit of
work performed;
|
S-87
Business
|
|
Ø
|
time and materials contracts, under which personnel and
equipment are provided under an agreed schedule of daily rates
with other direct costs being reimbursable;
|
|
Ø
|
cost plus fixed fee contracts, common with US government
entities and agencies under which income is earned solely from
the fee received. Cost-plus-fixed fee contracts are often used
for material procurement services; and
|
|
Ø
|
a combination of the above (such as lump sums for certain items
and unit rates for others).
|
Changes in scope of work are subject to change orders to be
agreed to by both parties. Change orders not agreed to in either
scope or price result in claims to be resolved in a dispute
resolution process. These changes and claims can affect our
contract revenue either positively or negatively.
We usually obtain contracts through competitive bidding or
through negotiations with long-standing clients. We are
typically invited to bid on projects undertaken by our clients
who maintain approved bidder lists. Bidders are pre-qualified by
virtue of their prior performance for such clients, as well as
their experience, reputation for quality, safety record,
financial strength and bonding capacity.
In evaluating bid opportunities, we consider such factors as the
client, the geographic location, the difficulty of the work, our
current and projected workload, the likelihood of additional
work, the projects cost and profitability estimates, and
our competitive advantage relative to other likely bidders. With
respect to projects in developing countries, we give careful
thought and consideration to the political and financial
stability of the country or region where the work is to be
performed. The bid estimate forms the basis of a project budget
against which performance is tracked through a project control
system, enabling management to monitor projects effectively.
All US government contracts and many of our other contracts
provide for termination of the contract for the convenience of
the client. In addition, some contracts are subject to certain
completion schedule requirements that require us to pay
liquidated damages in the event schedules are not met as the
result of circumstances within our control.
We act as prime contractor on a majority of the construction
projects we undertake. In our capacity as prime contractor and
when acting as a subcontractor, we perform most of the work on
our projects with our own resources and typically subcontract
only such specialized activities as hazardous waste removal,
non-destructive inspection, tank erection, catering and
security. In the construction industry, the prime contractor is
normally responsible for the performance of the entire contract,
including subcontract work. Thus, when acting as a prime
contractor, we are subject to the risk associated with the
failure of one or more subcontractors to perform as anticipated.
Although a majority of our backlog is currently composed of cost
plus contracts, a substantial portion of our projects are and
will continue to be performed on a fixed-price basis. Under a
fixed-price contract, we agree on the price that we will receive
for the entire project, based upon specific assumptions and
project criteria. If our estimates of our own costs to complete
the project are below the actual costs that we may incur, our
margins will decrease, and we may incur a loss.
The revenue, cost and gross profit realized on a fixed-price
contract will often vary from the estimated amounts because of
unforeseen conditions or changes in job conditions and
variations in labor and equipment productivity over the term of
the contract. If we are unsuccessful in mitigating these risks,
we may realize gross profits that are different from those
originally estimated and may incur losses on projects. Depending
on the size of a project, these variations from estimated
contract performance could have a significant effect on our
operating results for any quarter or year. In some cases, we are
able to recover additional costs and profits from the client
through the change order process. In general, turnkey contracts
to be performed on a fixed-price basis involve an increased risk
of significant variations. This is a result of the long-term
nature of these contracts and the inherent difficulties in
estimating costs and of the interrelationship of the integrated
services to be provided under these
S-88
Business
contracts whereby unanticipated costs or delays in performing
part of the contract can have compounding effects by increasing
costs of performing other parts of the contract. Our accounting
policy related to contract variations and claims requires
recognition of all costs as incurred. Revenue from change
orders, extra work and variations in the scope of work is
recognized when an agreement is reached with the client as to
the scope of work and when it is probable that the cost of such
work will be recovered in a change in contract price. Profit on
change orders, extra work and variations in the scope of work is
recognized when realization is assured beyond a reasonable
doubt. Also included in contract costs and recognized income not
yet billed on uncompleted contracts are amounts we seek or will
seek to collect from customers or others for errors or changes
in contract specifications or design, contract change orders in
dispute or unapproved as to both scope and price, or other
customer-related causes of unanticipated additional contract
costs (unapproved change orders). These amounts are recorded at
their estimated net realizable value when realization is
probable and can be reasonably estimated. Unapproved change
orders and claims also involve the use of estimates, and it is
reasonably possible that revisions to the estimated recoverable
amounts of recorded unapproved change orders may be made in the
near-term. If we do not successfully resolve these matters, a
net expense (recorded as a reduction in revenues), may be
required, in addition to amounts that have been previously
provided for.
EMPLOYEES
At September 30, 2007, we employed directly a
multi-national work force of approximately 4,243 persons,
of which approximately 92.3 percent were citizens of the
respective countries in which they work. Although the level of
activity varies from year to year, we have maintained an average
work force of approximately 3,972 over the past five years. The
minimum employment during that period has been 3,282 and the
maximum was 4,870. At September 30, 2007, approximately
11.5 percent of our employees were covered by collective
bargaining agreements. We believe relations with our employees
are satisfactory.
The following table sets forth the location of employees by work
countries as of September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
employees
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
US Construction
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
|
|
36.5
|
%
|
US Engineering
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
US Administration
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
Oman
|
|
|
1,455
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,243
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUIPMENT
We own, lease, and maintain a fleet of generally standardized
construction, transportation and support equipment. In 2006 and
2005, expenditures for capital equipment were $12.3 million
and $25.1 million, respectively. At September 30, 2007
the net book value of our property, plant and equipment was
$120.4 million. For the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2007 capital equipment additions (including
capital leases) were $45.7 million.
Historically, we have elected to own rather than rent equipment
to ensure the required equipment is available as needed. We
believe this has resulted in lower equipment costs. We are
constantly evaluating the availability of equipment and in the
past two years have leased equipment to ensure its availability
to support projects. The increasing demand for construction
equipment in North America and our improved liquidity have
caused us to reevaluate our approach to securing necessary
equipment, and we
S-89
Business
currently believe that ownership of certain components of the
equipment fleet may be more cost effective. Certain cost
reimbursable contracts make it attractive to own rather than
lease equipment because we can charge fair market rental rates
for owned equipment and ownership costs are less than rental or
operating lease costs. We continue to evaluate expected
equipment utilization, given anticipated market conditions, and
may buy or lease new equipment and dispose of underutilized
equipment from time to time. All equipment is subject to
scheduled maintenance to maximize fleet readiness. We have
maintenance facilities at Azaiba, Oman, Ft. McMurray,
Canada and Houston, Texas, as well as temporary site facilities
on major jobs to minimize downtime. In 2006, we made the
decision to consolidate our equipment yards and equipment
maintenance activities in the United States and sold our
Channelview facility in 2007.
FACILITIES
In Houston, Texas we own a
10-acre
equipment yard and maintenance facility which includes an
8,500 square foot maintenance/warehouse building and an
office building totaling approximately 8,200 square feet.
Also, in Tulsa, Oklahoma we own a 100,000 square foot
office building. In Canada, we own three fabrication facilities,
totaling over 110,000 square feet, in Edmonton and
Ft. McMurray, Alberta. At September 30, 2007, we
leased all other facilities used in our operations, including
corporate offices in Panama; administrative, procurement and
engineering offices in Houston, Texas, Salt Lake City (Murray),
Utah and Kansas City, Missouri; and various office facilities,
equipment sites and expatriate housing units in the United
States, Canada, and Oman. Rent expense for these facilities was
$2.7 million in 2006 and $2.3 million in 2005. In 2007
we sold our Channelview, Texas equipment and maintenance
facility and we are expanding the Houston yard and office
building.
INSURANCE AND
BONDING
Operational risks are analyzed and categorized by our risk
management department and are insured through major
international insurance brokers under a comprehensive insurance
program, which includes commercial insurance policies,
consisting of the types and amounts typically carried by
companies engaged in the worldwide engineering and construction
industry. We maintain worldwide master policies written mostly
through highly-rated insurers. These policies cover our
property, plant, equipment and cargo against all normally
insurable risks, including war risk, political risk and
terrorism, in third world countries. Other policies cover our
workers and liabilities arising out of our operations. Primary
and excess liability insurance limits are consistent with the
level of our asset base. Risks of loss or damage to project
works and materials are often insured on our behalf by our
clients. On other projects, builders all-risk
insurance is purchased when deemed necessary.
Substantially all insurance is purchased and maintained at the
corporate level, other than certain basic insurance, which must
be purchased in some countries in order to comply with local
insurance laws.
The insurance protection we maintain may not be sufficient or
effective under all circumstances or against all hazards to
which we may be subject. An enforceable claim for which we are
not fully insured could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations. In the future, our ability to maintain
insurance, which may not be available or at rates we consider
reasonable, may be affected by events over which we have no
control, such as those that occurred on September 11, 2001.
We often are required to provide surety bonds guaranteeing our
performance
and/or
financial obligations. The amount of bonding available to us
depends upon our experience and reputation in the industry,
financial condition, backlog and management expertise, among
other factors. We also use letters of credit issued under our
credit facility in lieu of bonds to satisfy performance and
financial guarantees on some projects when required.
S-90
Description
of new senior credit facility
Concurrent with the closing of the offering contemplated by this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus and the
InServ acquisition, our wholly-owned subsidiary,
Willbros USA, Inc., intends to replace the existing three
year $100.0 million senior secured synthetic credit
facility with a new three year senior secured
$150.0 million revolving credit facility due 2010 and a
four year $100.0 million term loan facility due 2011 (the
2007 Credit Facility) with a group of banks led by
Calyon New York Branch (Calyon). We currently have
$250.0 million of commitments for the 2007 Credit Facility.
Our existing facility is costlier (including a five percent per
annum facility fee) than the 2007 Credit Facility and contains
numerous conditions which have restricted our financial
flexibility. With our improving financial results, we have been
able to significantly improve the terms and conditions in our
2007 Credit Facility and we expect that the 2007 Credit Facility
will enhance our financial flexibility, reduce our credit
expense and provide added financial support to our growth
strategy.
Our obligations under the 2007 Credit Facility will be
guaranteed by Willbros Group, Inc. and all of its material
foreign and domestic subsidiaries and will be secured by a first
priority security interest in all existing and future acquired
assets of those companies and of Willbros USA, Inc. We will have
the option, subject to Calyons consent, to increase the
size of the revolving credit facility to $200.0 million
within the first two years of the closing date of the 2007
Credit Facility. We will be able to utilize 100 percent of
the revolving credit facility to issue performance letters of
credit and 33.3 percent of the facility for cash advances
and financial letters of credit.
We expect that the term loan will be available to backstop the
funding requirements from our InServ acquisition and that, while
we intend to fund the $202.5 million cash portion of the
purchase price for InServ from the net proceeds of the equity
offering contemplated by this prospectus supplement, we may
borrow under the term loan facility at our option, subject to
certain terms and conditions, to consummate the InServ
acquisition. We expect that the term loan facility will be made
available in a single advance on the closing date of the 2007
Credit Facility and that any unused term loan commitment will be
terminated on that date. The receipt of net proceeds of at least
$100.0 million from the public offering will be a condition
precedent to closing the term loan.
Cash borrowings under the 2007 Credit Facility will bear
interest at a floating rate based on the base rate (as defined
in the credit agreement) or, at our option, on the one-, two-,
three- or six-month Eurodollar rate, plus, in each case, the
applicable margin. The applicable margin will vary based on our
leverage ratio, as defined in the credit agreement. In addition,
we will pay (i) a performance letter of credit fee on the
face amount of all outstanding performance letters of credit
ranging from 1.5 percent per annum to 3 percent per
annum depending on our leverage ratio, (ii) a financial
letter of credit fee on the face amount of all outstanding
financial letters of credit at the same rate as the rate paid
for cash borrowings, (iii) a commitment fee of
0.50 percent per annum on the unused revolving commitment,
and (iv) a fronting fee equal to 0.125 percent per
annum applied to the face amount of all outstanding letters of
credit. We will also pay certain upfront fees, commitment fees
and arrangement fees on the closing date of the 2007 Credit
Facility.
If the term loan is:
|
|
Ø
|
funded in whole or in part on the closing date of the 2007
Credit Facility; or
|
|
Ø
|
funded on the closing date of the 2007 Credit Facility and the
aggregate amount of the proceeds of this offering is less than
$200.0 million and the Company decides not to effect the
acquisition,
|
Calyon will have the right to increase the pricing and fees as
necessary to ensure a successful syndication of the 2007 Credit
Facility by either increasing the applicable margin or the
upfront fees, or a combination of the foregoing.
S-91
Description of
credit facility
The 2007 Credit Facility will contain customary covenants,
including, among other things:
|
|
Ø
|
maintenance of a maximum leverage ratio;
|
|
Ø
|
maintenance of a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio;
|
|
Ø
|
maintenance of a minimum net worth amount;
|
|
Ø
|
limitations on capital expenditures triggered by liquidity
levels lower than $35 million;
|
|
Ø
|
limitations on foreign cash investments;
|
|
Ø
|
limitations on total indebtedness;
|
|
Ø
|
limitations on certain asset sales and dispositions; and
|
|
Ø
|
limitations on certain acquisitions and asset purchases.
|
The 2007 Credit Facility will include customary events of
default, including, among other things, and subject to
applicable grace periods, if any:
|
|
Ø
|
our failure to make any payment of principal of, or interest on,
any loan under the 2007 Credit Facility when due and payable;
|
|
Ø
|
breaches of any representations or warranties in any material
respect when made;
|
|
Ø
|
breaches of certain agreements and covenants, including
reporting requirements and negative covenants;
|
|
Ø
|
certain acts of bankruptcy, insolvency or dissolution;
|
|
Ø
|
a default in payment under other debts of ours;
|
|
Ø
|
actual or asserted invalidity of any guarantee or security
document or security interest;
|
|
Ø
|
any judgment or order for the payment of money in excess of
$15 million is rendered against us or any of our operating
subsidiaries which remains unsatisfied, excluding the DOJ/SEC
settlement; and
|
|
Ø
|
certain change of control events.
|
S-92
Management
and board of directors
The following table sets forth information regarding our
directors and executive officers. Officers are elected annually
by, and serve at the discretion of, our Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
|
John T. McNabb, II
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Director and Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
Robert R. Harl
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Director, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating
Officer
|
John K. Allcorn
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
John T. Dalton
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
|
Van A. Welch
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Michael J. Bayer
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Director
|
S. Fred Isaacs
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
Director
|
Gerald J. Maier
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
Director
|
Robert L. Sluder
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Director
|
James B. Taylor, Jr.
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
Director
|
S. Miller Williams
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Director
|
John T. McNabb, II was elected to the Board of
Directors in August 2006. Mr. McNabb is Founder and
Chairman of the Board of Directors of Growth Capital Partners,
L.P., a merchant banking firm that provides financial advisory
services to middle market companies throughout the United
States, since 1992. Since 2001, he has served as a Principal of
Southwest Mezzanine Investments, the investment affiliate of
Growth Capital Partners, L.P. Previously, he was a Managing
Director of Bankers Trust New York Corporation and a Board
member of BT Southwest, Inc., the southwest U.S. merchant
banking affiliate of Bankers Trust, from 1990 to 1992.
Mr. McNabb also held positions at The Prudential Insurance
Company of America from 1984 to 1990, in positions with
Prudential-Bache Securities, The Prudentials Corporate
Finance Group, and Prudential Capital Corporation, a merchant
banking affiliate of The Prudential. Mr. McNabb currently
serves on the Board of Directors of Hiland Partners, L.P.
Robert R. Harl was elected to the Board of Directors and
as President and Chief Operating Officer of Willbros Group, Inc.
in January 2006, and as Chief Executive Officer in January 2007
to succeed Michael F. Curran. Mr. Harl has over
30 years experience working with Kellogg
Brown & Root (KBR), a global engineering,
construction and services company, and its subsidiaries in a
variety of officer capacities, serving as President of several
of the KBR business units. Mr. Harls experience
includes executive management responsibilities for units serving
both upstream and downstream oil and gas sectors as well as
power, government and infrastructure sectors. He was President
and Chief Executive Officer of KBR from March 2001 until July
2004 when he was appointed Chairman, a position he held until
January 2005. KBR filed for reorganization under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in December 2003 in order to
discharge certain asbestos and silica personal injury claims.
The order confirming KBRs plan of reorganization became
final in December 2004, and the plan of reorganization became
effective in January 2005. Mr. Harl was engaged as a
consultant to Willbros from August 2005 until he became an
executive officer and director of Willbros in January 2006.
John K. Allcorn joined Willbros in May 2000 as Senior
Vice President of Willbros International, Inc. and was
elected Executive Vice President of Willbros Group, Inc. in
2001. Mr. Allcorn was employed at U.S. Pipeline, Inc.,
a North American pipeline construction company, as Senior Vice
President, from July 1997 until joining Willbros in May 2000. He
served from 1985 to 1997 at Gregory & Cook, Inc., an
international pipeline construction company, in various
management capacities, including Vice President, from June 1996
to July 1997. Mr. Allcorn has over 20 years of
pipeline industry experience including an established record in
operations management, finance and business development.
S-93
Management and
board of directors
John T. Dalton joined Willbros in November 2002 and was
elected Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Willbros
Group, Inc. Mr. Dalton has over 28 years of oil and
gas industry experience having worked in both the owner and
contractor regimes. From 1993 to November 2002, Mr. Dalton
served as outside counsel to Willbros advising on contracts.
Between 1980 and 1993, Mr. Dalton was employed by
Occidental Petroleum Corporation (Occidental) where
he served as an officer and chief legal counsel to various
business units in Occidentals oil and gas division, both
domestically and in Colombia, Pakistan and the United Kingdom.
Before entering private practice in 1993, Mr. Daltons
last position with Occidental was Vice President and General
Counsel of Island Creek Corporation in Lexington, Kentucky.
Van A. Welch joined Willbros in 2006 as Senior Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Willbros
Group, Inc. Mr. Welch has over 28 years of experience
in project controls, administrative and finance positions with
KBR, Inc. (formerly known as Kellogg Brown & Root), a
global engineering, construction and services company, and its
subsidiaries, serving most recently as Vice
PresidentFinance and Investor Relations and as a member of
KBRs executive leadership team. From 1998 to 2006,
Mr. Welch held various other positions with KBR including
Vice President, Accounting and Finance of the Engineering and
Construction Division, Vice President, Accounting and Finance of
Onshore Operations and Senior Vice President of Shared Services.
Mr. Welch is a Certified Public Accountant.
Michael J. Bayer was elected to the Board of Directors in
December 2006. Mr. Bayer is the President and Chief
Executive Officer of Dumbarton Strategies, Washington, D.C.
Since 1992, Mr. Bayer has acted as a consultant engaged in
enterprise strategic planning and mergers and acquisitions,
specializing in the energy and national security sectors.
Mr. Bayer is the Chairman of the U.S. Department of
Defenses Business Board, and a member of the Sandia
National Laboratorys National Security Advisory Panel, the
U.S. Department of Defenses Science Board and the
Chief of Naval Operations Executive Panel. Mr. Bayers
previous U.S. Government service included appointments as a
member of the U.S. European Command Senior Advisory Group,
a member of the Board of Visitors of the United States Military
Academy, Chairman of the U.S. Army Science Board, and
Chairman of the Air Force Secretarys Advisory Group.
Earlier in his career he was Counsel to a senior Member of the
U.S. House of Representatives, Deputy Assistant Secretary
at the U.S. Department of Energy, Malcolm Baldriges
Associate Deputy Secretary of Commerce, Counselor to the United
States Synthetic Fuels Corporation, Counselor to President
Bushs Commission on Aviation Security and Terrorism, and
the Federal Inspector for the Alaska Natural Gas Transportation
System. He has also served on a number of non-partisan task
forces to improve the management and efficiency of the
Department of Defense. Mr. Bayer currently serves on the
Board of Directors of DynCorp International, Inc. and Stratos
Global Corp.
S. Fred Isaacs was elected to the Board of Directors
in March 2004. Mr. Isaacs has been President of A1
Services, Inc. (formerly SFI Consulting, Inc.), an electrical
engineering services company, since March 1997. He was President
of Computer Video Training, Inc., a consulting company, from
August 1995 to March 1997. From September 1992 to August 1995,
he served as President of SFI Consulting, Inc. and Chairman of
the Board of Directors of TranAm Systems International, Inc., a
gas compression equipment company. Prior to that time, he served
in senior engineering and executive positions in the pipeline
industry for over 35 years, most recently as Senior Vice
President of Transportation of MAPCO, Inc. and President of
Mid-America
Pipeline Company and Seminole Pipeline Company from January 1983
until his retirement from MAPCO, Inc. in September 1992.
Gerald J. Maier was elected to the Board of Directors in
January 2007. Mr. Maier served as Chairman of TransCanada
PipeLines, a natural gas transmission and power company, from
1992 until his retirement in 1998. He also served as President
and Chief Executive Officer of TransCanada PipeLines from 1985
to 1994. Mr. Maier is a director of Bow Valley Energy Ltd.,
a Canadian oil and gas company listed on the Toronto Stock
Exchange. Mr. Maier has served as Chairman of Granmar
S-94
Management and
board of directors
Investment, Ltd., a private family enterprise, since 1986, and
as Chairman of the Board of Regents of the Athol Murray College
of Notre Dame (Wilcox, Saskatchewan) since 1997.
Robert L. Sluder was President of Kern River Gas
Transmission Company, the owner and operator of a 1,700-mile
interstate natural gas pipeline between southwestern Wyoming and
southern California, from February 2002 to December 2005 when he
retired. He was Senior Vice President and General Manager of The
Williams Companies in Salt Lake City from December 2001 to
February 2002 and Vice President of Williams Operations from
January 1996 to December 2001. Mr. Sluder served as Senior
Vice President and General Manager of Kern River from 1995 to
1996 and as Director, Operations for Kern River from 1991 to
1995. Prior to that time, he held a variety of engineering and
construction supervisory positions with various companies.
James B. Taylor, Jr. was elected to the Board of
Directors in February 1999. Mr. Taylor co-founded Solana
Petroleum Corp., a Canadian-based public oil and gas exploration
and production company in 1997, and served as Chairman of its
Board of Directors until December 2000. From 1996 to 1998, he
was a Director and consultant for Arakis Energy, a Canadian
public company with operations in North America and the Middle
East. Prior to that time, he served for 28 years for
Occidental Petroleum Corporation in various worldwide
exploration and operations management positions before retiring
in 1996 as Executive Vice President.
S. Miller Williams was elected to the Board of
Directors in May 2004. He was Executive Vice President of
Strategic Development of Vartec Telecom, Inc., an international
consumer telecommunications services company, from August 2002
until May 2004, and was appointed interim Chief Financial
Officer of Vartec in November 2003. Since leaving Vartec, he has
primarily been involved in personal investments. From 2000 to
August 2003, Mr. Williams was Executive Chairman of the
Board of PowerTel, Inc., a public company which provided
telecommunications services in Australia. From 1991 to 2002, he
served in various executive positions with Williams
Communications Group, a subsidiary of The Williams Companies
that provided global network and broadband media services, most
recently as Senior Vice President-Corporate Development and
General Manager-International. He was President and owner of
MediaTech, Incorporated, a manufacturer and dealer of computer
tape and supplies, from 1987 until the company was sold in 1992.
Mr. Williams currently serves on the board of directors of
eLEC Communications Corp.
S-95
Material
US Federal and Panamanian income tax consequences
The following discussion under US Federal
Income Taxation of Willbros Group, Inc. and Its
Subsidiaries, US Federal Income Tax
Considerations Applicable to US Holders and
US Federal Income Tax Considerations Applicable
to
Non-US Holders
summarizes the opinion of Sidley Austin LLP, our special US tax
counsel, as to certain material US federal income tax
consequences with respect to the acquisition, ownership and
disposition of our common stock. The following discussion under
Panamanian Tax constitutes the opinion of
Arias, Fabrega & Fabrega, our Panamanian counsel, as
to certain material Panamanian income tax consequences
applicable to us and a holder of our common stock. We will file
these opinions with the Securities and Exchange Commission as
exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus
supplement forms a part. See Where You Can Find More
Information in the accompanying prospectus.
The following discussion is based upon the tax laws of the
United States and Panama as in effect on the date of this
prospectus. This discussion does not take into account
US state or local tax laws, or tax laws of jurisdictions
outside the United States and Panama. This discussion is not tax
advice nor does it purport to be a complete analysis or listing
of all the potential tax consequences of holding our common
stock, nor does it purport to furnish information in the level
of detail or with attention to your specific tax circumstances
that would be provided by your own tax advisor. Accordingly, if
you are considering purchasing our common stock, we suggest that
you consult with your own tax advisors as to the United States,
Panamanian or other state, local or foreign tax consequences to
you of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common
stock.
Sidley Austin LLP, our special US tax counsel, is opining on
certain US federal income tax issues in connection with this
offering. Sidley Austin LLP has advised us that its opinion is
not binding on the Internal Revenue Service (the
IRS) or on any court and that no assurance can be
given that the IRS will not challenge any of the conclusions in
such opinion or that such a challenge would not be successful.
Such opinion of Sidley Austin LLP relies upon and is premised on
the accuracy of factual statements and representations by us
concerning our business and properties, ownership, organization,
sources of income and manner of operation.
The statements made herein with respect to US federal
income tax are based upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code), Treasury regulations (final,
temporary and proposed), IRS rulings and judicial decisions now
in effect, all of which are subject to change (possibly, with
retroactive effect) or different interpretations. We have not
obtained, nor do we intend to obtain, a ruling from the IRS with
respect to the US federal income tax consequences of
acquiring, owning or disposing of our common stock.
The discussion below does not address any tax consequences that
may occur as the result of the possible restructuring described
above under Prospectus supplement
summaryOther
recent
eventsPossible
restructuring with a new Delaware public parent.
US FEDERAL INCOME
TAXATION OF WILLBROS GROUP, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
A foreign corporation that is engaged in the conduct of a trade
or business in the United States is taxable at graduated rates
on its income that is effectively connected with
such trade or business. For this purpose, effectively
connected income includes
US-source
income other than certain types of passive income and capital
gains, and, if the taxpayer has an office or other fixed place
of business in the United States, certain foreign-source
dividends, interest, rents, royalties and income from the sale
of property. The activities of Willbros Group, Inc. and its
non-US subsidiaries
are carried out in a manner
S-96
Material US
Federal and Panamanian income tax consequences
that is intended to prevent each of such corporations from being
engaged in the conduct of a trade or business in the United
States. Based on representations made by us and on the
assumption that the operations of Willbros Group, Inc. and its
foreign subsidiaries continue to be conducted in the manner they
are presently conducted, Sidley Austin LLP is of the opinion
that, with exceptions not likely to be material, the income
currently earned by Willbros Group, Inc. and its
non-US subsidiaries
should not be treated as effectively connected income subject to
US federal income tax even if such corporations were
determined to be engaged in the conduct of a trade or business
in the United States. However, if any material amount of income
earned, currently or historically, by Willbros Group, Inc. or
its
non-US subsidiaries
from operations outside the United States constituted income
effectively connected with a United States trade or business,
and as a result became taxable in the United States, our
consolidated operating results could be materially and adversely
affected.
Our US subsidiaries will be subject to US federal
income tax on their worldwide income regardless of its source,
subject to reduction by allowable foreign tax credits. Moreover,
it should be noted that in the event that any of the US
subsidiaries of Willbros Group, Inc. performs services for
Willbros Group, Inc. or its
non-US subsidiaries
at rates that are not commensurate with the standard rates that
would be charged to an unrelated party at arms-length for
similar services, the IRS would be able, pursuant to
Section 482 of the Code, to allocate additional income to
such US subsidiaries to reflect arms-length charges
for such services.
Distributions by our US subsidiaries to us or to our
non-US subsidiaries
may be subject to US withholding tax.
There is no income tax treaty between Panama and the United
States.
US FEDERAL INCOME
TAX CONSIDERATIONS APPLICABLE TO US HOLDERS
The following is a summary of certain material US federal
income tax considerations generally applicable to a
US holder who acquires our common stock. As used in this
summary of US federal income tax considerations, the term
US holder means a beneficial holder of common
stock that for US federal income tax purposes is (i) a
citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a
corporation, or an entity treated as a corporation, formed under
the laws of the United States or any state thereof (including
the District of Columbia), (iii) an estate, the income of
which is subject to US federal income taxation regardless
of its source, and (iv) in general, a trust if a court
within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision
over the administration of the trust and one or more
United States persons have the authority to control
all substantial decisions of the trust.
This summary does not purport to deal with all aspects of
US federal income taxation that may be relevant to a
particular US holder in light of the holders
circumstances (for example, persons subject to the alternative
minimum tax provisions of the Code or a holder whose
functional currency is not the US dollar).
Also, it is not intended to be wholly applicable to all
categories of US holders, some of which (such as dealers in
securities or currencies, traders in securities that elect to
use a mark-to-market method of accounting, banks, thrifts,
regulated investment companies, insurance companies, tax-exempt
organizations and persons holding common stock as part of a
hedging or conversion transaction or straddle or persons deemed
to sell common stock under the constructive sale provisions of
the Code) may be subject to special rules. This summary also
does not discuss any aspect of state, local or foreign law or
US federal estate and gift tax law as applicable to
US holders of the common stock. In addition, this
discussion is limited to persons who will hold the common stock
as capital assets (generally, for investment).
S-97
Material US
Federal and Panamanian income tax consequences
All prospective purchasers of the common stock are advised to
consult their own tax advisors regarding the US federal,
state, local and foreign tax consequences of the purchase,
ownership and disposition of the common stock in their
particular situations.
This summary does not consider the US federal income tax
consequences of the holding or the disposition of the common
stock by a partnership. If a partnership (including for this
purpose any entity treated as a partnership for US federal
income tax purposes) or other pass-through entity is a
beneficial owner of the common stock, the US federal income
tax treatment of a partner or other owner of a pass-through
entity generally will depend upon the status of the partner or
other owner and the activities of the partnership or other
pass-through entity. A holder of the common stock that is a
partnership or other pass-through entity, and its partners or
owners, should consult their individual tax advisors about the
US federal income tax consequences of holding and disposing
of shares of common stock.
Sale, exchange,
redemption or other disposition of common stock
Subject to the passive foreign investment company
(PFIC) rules discussed below, gain or loss, if any,
realized by a US holder on the sale, exchange, redemption
or other disposition of a share of common stock will generally
be subject to US federal income taxation as capital gain or
loss in an amount equal to the difference between the
US holders adjusted tax basis in the share and the
amount realized on the disposition. A US holders
adjusted tax basis in a share generally will equal the amount
paid by the holder for the share.
Gain or loss realized on the sale, exchange, redemption or other
disposition of a share of common stock generally will be
long-term capital gain or loss if at the time of the disposition
the share has been held for more than one year. For
non-corporate taxpayers, including individuals, net long-term
capital gains generally are taxed at a lower rate than ordinary
income (generally 15 percent for most long-term gains
recognized in taxable years beginning on or before
December 31, 2010). The deductibility of capital losses may
be subject to limitation. Any gain or loss realized by a
US holder on the sale of a share of common stock will
generally constitute US source gain or loss for foreign tax
credit purposes.
Distributions on
common stock
Subject to the PFIC rules discussed below, the gross amount of
any distribution by us with respect to shares of common stock
generally will be included in the gross income of a
US holder as dividend income to the extent paid out of our
current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under
US federal income tax principles. Such dividends will not
be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally
allowed to corporations under the Code. However, provided that
we are not a PFIC, such dividends should be qualified
dividend income, which, if received by a US holder
that is a non-corporate taxpayer, including an individual, in
taxable years beginning on or before December 31, 2010, is
subject to tax at the rates applicable to net long-term capital
gain, discussed above. Qualified dividend income does not
include dividends received on shares of common stock with
respect to which the US holder has not met a minimum
holding-period requirement or to the extent the US holder
is obligated to make related payments with respect to
substantially similar or related property (e.g., in a short sale
of such shares).
To the extent that the amount of any distribution exceeds our
accumulated earnings and profits and our earnings and profits
for the current taxable year, the distribution will first be
treated as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of the
US holders adjusted tax basis in the shares of common
stock and, to the extent that such distribution exceeds the
US holders adjusted tax basis in the shares, will be
taxed as a capital gain from the sale or exchange of the shares.
S-98
Material US
Federal and Panamanian income tax consequences
If we are not a United States-owned foreign
corporation as defined below, dividends we pay on the
common stock will generally be treated for US foreign tax
credit purposes as foreign source income. If, and for so long
as, we are a United States-owned foreign corporation, dividends
we pay on the common stock may, subject to certain exceptions,
instead be treated for US foreign tax credit purposes as
partly foreign-source income and partly
US-source
income, in proportion to our earnings and profits allocable to
foreign and US sources, respectively. We will be treated as
a United States-owned foreign corporation so long as stock
representing 50 percent or more of the voting power or
value of our stock is held, directly or indirectly, by
US persons. No assurance can be given as to whether we will
be treated as a United States-owned foreign corporation. Except
in the case of financial institutions, dividends on our common
stock will generally be treated as passive category income for
purposes of Section 904 of the Code, which limits the
extent to which foreign tax credits may be utilized.
Controlled
foreign corporation rules
Under the Code, a foreign corporation will be a controlled
foreign corporation (CFC) if United States
shareholders own, on any day during the corporations
taxable year, more than 50 percent of either the total
combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote
or the total value of such corporations stock. A
United States shareholder is a US person who
owns (after applying certain attribution rules) 10 percent
or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of
stock entitled to vote. If Willbros Group, Inc. or any of its
non-US subsidiaries
were to become a CFC, then each person who is a United States
shareholder of Willbros Group, Inc. would be subject to federal
income taxation on such persons share of certain types of
income earned by such corporation. Upon a disposition of a
CFCs stock by a United States shareholder, a portion of
the gain realized may be recharacterized as dividend income to
the extent of such United States shareholders share of the
previously untaxed earnings and profits accumulated during such
United States shareholders holding period of such CFC
stock. The articles of incorporation of Willbros Group, Inc.
contain restrictions designed to prevent it from becoming a CFC.
See Description of Capital StockAnti-Takeover
Effects of Provisions of Our Articles of Incorporation and
By-laws in the accompanying prospectus. Based on
representations made by the management of Willbros Group, Inc.
regarding the nature of the ownership of our common stock
(including the representation that, based on the information
available to us, we believe that there is no US person who
(after applying the relevant attribution rules) owns
10 percent or more of the voting power of our common
stock), Sidley Austin LLP is of the opinion that Willbros Group,
Inc. and its
non-US subsidiaries
are not CFCs. (The references in this paragraph to
non-US subsidiaries
of Willbros Group, Inc. do not include foreign subsidiaries of a
US subsidiary of ours, which foreign subsidiaries are CFCs
because they have a US parent corporation. Certain types of
income realized by such foreign subsidiaries will be taxable to
that US subsidiary).
Passive foreign
investment company rules
If we were to be treated as a PFIC, U.S. holders of the
common stock could be subject to higher US federal income
taxes on certain distributions, and on any gain recognized on
the disposition of the common stock, than otherwise would apply.
A
non-US corporation
will be classified as a PFIC if 75 percent or more of its
gross income for the taxable year is passive income or if the
value of the assets it holds during the taxable year that
produce passive income (or are held for the production of
passive income) is at least 50 percent of the total value
of its assets, taking into account a proportionate share of the
income and assets of corporations at least 25 percent owned
by such corporation. Based on representations made by the
management of Willbros Group, Inc. regarding the nature of the
income and assets of Willbros Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries,
Sidley Austin LLP is of the opinion that Willbros Group, Inc. is
not a PFIC. However, because the PFIC determination will be made
annually on the basis of our income and assets, and because the
principles and methodology for applying the PFIC tests are
S-99
Material US
Federal and Panamanian income tax consequences
not entirely clear, there can be no assurance that we will not
be a PFIC in the current or subsequent taxable years.
US holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding
the US federal income tax consequences to them if we were
treated as a PFIC.
Information
reporting and backup withholding
The Code and the Treasury regulations require those who make
specified payments to report the payments to the IRS. Among the
specified payments are interest, dividends and proceeds paid by
brokers to their customers. The required information returns
enable the IRS to determine whether the recipient properly
included the payments in income. This reporting regime is
reinforced by backup withholding rules. These rules
require the payors to withhold tax (currently at the rate of
28 percent) from payments subject to information reporting
if the recipient fails to provide his or her taxpayer
identification number to the payor, furnishes an incorrect
identification number or repeatedly fails to report interest or
dividends on his or her US federal income tax returns. The
information reporting and backup withholding rules do not apply
to payments to corporations, tax-exempt organizations and other
exempt recipients.
Payments of dividends or proceeds of the sale or other
disposition of common stock to a US holder that is not an
exempt recipient will be subject to information reporting and
backup withholding will apply unless the holder provides us or
our paying agent with a correct taxpayer identification number,
certified under penalties of perjury, as well as certain other
information, or otherwise establishes an exemption from backup
withholding.
Any amounts withheld from a payment to a US holder of
common stock under the backup withholding rules can be credited
against any US federal income tax liability of the
US holder and may entitle the holder to a refund, provided
that the required information is furnished to the IRS.
US FEDERAL INCOME
TAX CONSIDERATIONS APPLICABLE TO
NON-US
HOLDERS
As used herein, the term
non-US holder
means a beneficial owner of our common stock that is not a
US holder (which term is defined under
US Federal Income Tax Considerations Applicable
to US Holders above).
Assuming that Willbros Group, Inc. is not at any time engaged in
a US trade or business, dividends on our common stock
generally should not be subject to US federal income tax in
the hands of a
non-US holder.
Gain from the sale, exchange or redemption of our common stock
generally should not be subject to US federal income tax in
the hands of a
non-US holder.
If a
non-US holder
holds our common stock in connection with a US trade or
business carried on by such
non-US holder
(and, if an applicable tax treaty applies, a US permanent
establishment is maintained by such
non-US holder),
or if such
non-US holder
is an individual who was present in the United States for
183 days or more during a taxable year in which gain from
the sale or other disposition of our common stock is realized,
then such
non-US holder
may be subject to US federal income tax on its dividend
income or its gain with respect to our common stock, depending
on such
non-US holders
particular circumstances.
Payments of dividends on our common stock which are made to
non-US holders
and their proceeds from the disposition of our common stock
generally will not be subject to information reporting or backup
withholding if certain certification and identification
procedures are met or an exemption otherwise applies.
S-100
Material US
Federal and Panamanian income tax consequences
PANAMANIAN
TAX
The following discussion of Panamanian tax matters is based upon
the tax laws of Panama and regulations thereunder in effect as
of the date of this prospectus, and is subject to any subsequent
change in Panamanian laws and regulations which may come into
effect after such date. The material Panamanian tax consequences
of ownership of the shares of our common stock are as follows.
General
Panamas income tax is exclusively territorial. Only income
actually derived from sources within Panama is subject to
taxation. Income derived by Panama corporations, foreign
corporations or individuals from off-shore operations is not
taxable. The territorial principle of taxation has been in force
throughout the history of the country and is supported by
legislation, administrative regulations and court decisions. We
have not been in the past and do not in the future expect to be
subject to income taxes in Panama because all of our income has
arisen from activities conducted entirely outside Panama. This
is the case even though we maintain our registered office in
Panama.
Taxation of
distributions and capital gains
There will be no Panamanian taxes on distribution of dividends
or capital gains realized by an individual or corporation,
regardless of its nationality or residency, from the sale or
other disposition of shares of common stock, so long as our
assets are held, and our activities are conducted, entirely
outside of Panama.
S-101
We are offering the shares of our common stock described in this
prospectus through the underwriters named below. UBS Securities
LLC and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC are the
representatives of the underwriters. We have entered into an
underwriting agreement with the underwriters. Subject to the
terms and conditions of the underwriting agreement, each of the
underwriters has severally agreed to purchase the number of
shares of common stock listed next to its name in the following
table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Underwriters
|
|
shares
|
|
|
|
|
UBS Securities LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Calyon Securities (USA) Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
D.A. Davidson & Co.
|
|
|
|
|
Natixis Bleichroeder Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
6,875,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters must
buy all of the shares if they buy any of them. However, the
underwriters are not required to take or pay for the shares
covered by the underwriters over-allotment option
described below.
Our common stock is offered subject to a number of conditions,
including:
|
|
Ø
|
receipt and acceptance of our common stock by the
underwriters; and
|
|
Ø
|
the underwriters right to reject orders in whole or in
part.
|
In connection with this offering, certain of the underwriters or
securities dealers may distribute prospectuses electronically.
OVER-ALLOTMENT
OPTION
We have granted the underwriters an option to buy up to
1,031,250 additional shares of our common stock. The
underwriters may exercise this option solely for the purpose of
covering over-allotments, if any, made in connection with this
offering. The underwriters have 30 days from the date of
this prospectus supplement to exercise this option. If the
underwriters exercise this option, they will each purchase
additional shares approximately in proportion to the amounts
specified in the table above.
COMMISSIONS AND
DISCOUNTS
Shares sold by the underwriters to the public will initially be
offered at the public offering price set forth on the cover of
this prospectus supplement. Any shares sold by the underwriters
to securities dealers may be sold at a discount of up to
$ per share from the public
offering price. Any of these securities dealers may resell any
shares purchased from the underwriters to other brokers or
dealers at a discount of up to $
per share from the public offering price. If all the shares are
not sold at the public offering price, the representatives may
change the offering price and the other selling terms. Sales of
shares made outside of the United States may be made by
affiliates of the underwriters.
S-102
Underwriting
The following table shows the per share and total underwriting
discounts and commissions we will pay to the underwriters,
assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the
underwriters option to purchase up to an additional
1,031,250 shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No
exercise
|
|
|
Full
exercise
|
|
|
|
|
Per share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We estimate that the total expenses of this offering payable by
us, not including the underwriting discounts and commissions,
will be approximately $1,140,000.
In compliance with NASD guidelines, the maximum commission or
discount to be received by any NASD member or independent
broker-dealer may not exceed eight percent of the aggregate
amount of the securities offered pursuant to this prospectus
supplement, the accompanying prospectus and any other applicable
prospectus supplement.
NO SALES OF
SIMILAR SECURITIES
We and our executive officers and directors have entered into
lock-up
agreements with the underwriters. Under these agreements, we and
each of these persons may not, without the prior written
approval of UBS Securities LLC and Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC, subject to limited exceptions, offer, sell, contract
to sell or otherwise dispose of or hedge our common stock or
securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for
our common stock. These restrictions will be in effect for a
period of 90 days after the date of this prospectus
supplement. At any time and without public notice, UBS
Securities LLC and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC may in
their sole discretion release all or some of the securities from
these
lock-up
agreements.
INDEMNIFICATION
AND CONTRIBUTION
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters and their
controlling persons against certain liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act. If we are unable to
provide this indemnification, we will contribute to payments the
underwriters and their controlling persons may be required to
make in respect of those liabilities.
NEW YORK STOCK
EXCHANGE LISTING
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol WG.
PRICE
STABILIZATION, SHORT POSITIONS
In connection with this offering, the underwriters may engage in
activities that stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the
price of our common stock, including:
|
|
Ø
|
stabilizing transactions;
|
|
Ø
|
short sales;
|
|
Ø
|
purchases to cover positions created by short sales;
|
|
Ø
|
imposition of penalty bids; and
|
|
Ø
|
syndicate covering transactions.
|
Stabilizing transactions consist of bids or purchases made for
the purpose of preventing or retarding a decline in the market
price of our common stock while this offering is in progress.
These transactions may also include making short sales of our
common stock, which involve the sale by the underwriters
S-103
Underwriting
of a greater number of shares of common stock than they are
required to purchase in this offering. Short sales may be
covered short sales, which are short positions in an
amount not greater than the underwriters over-allotment
option referred to above, or may be naked short
sales, which are short positions in excess of that amount.
The underwriters may close out any covered short position either
by exercising their over-allotment option, in whole or in part,
or by purchasing shares in the open market. In making this
determination, the underwriters will consider, among other
things, the price of shares available for purchase in the open
market compared to the price at which they may purchase shares
through the over-allotment option. The underwriters must close
out any naked short position by purchasing shares in the open
market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if
the underwriters are concerned that there may be downward
pressure on the price of the common stock in the open market
that could adversely affect investors who purchased in this
offering.
The underwriters also may impose a penalty bid. This occurs when
a particular underwriter repays to the underwriters a portion of
the underwriting discount received by it because the
representatives have repurchased shares sold by or for the
account of that underwriter in stabilizing or short covering
transactions.
As a result of these activities, the price of our common stock
may be higher than the price that otherwise might exist in the
open market. If these activities are commenced, they may be
discontinued by the underwriters at any time. The underwriters
may carry out these transactions on the New York Stock Exchange
in the over-the-counter market or otherwise.
AFFILIATIONS
The underwriters and their affiliates have provided and may
provide certain commercial banking, financial advisory and
investment banking services for us for which they receive fees.
Specifically, Calyon New York Branch (Calyon) has
acted as administrative agent and a lender under our 2006 Credit
Facility. We have also received commitments under the proposed
2007 Credit Facility from a group of banks led by Calyon and UBS
Securities LLC as a participating lender.
The underwriters and their affiliates may from time to time in
the future engage in transactions with us and perform services
for us in the ordinary course of their business.
S-104
The validity of the shares of common stock offered by this
prospectus supplement and certain Panamanian income tax matters
will be passed upon for us by Arias, Fabrega &
Fabrega, Panama City, Panama. Certain US federal income tax
matters will be passed upon for us by our special US tax
counsel, Sidley Austin LLP, Los Angeles, California. Certain
legal matters will be passed on for us by Conner &
Winters, LLP, Tulsa, Oklahoma. The underwriters have been
represented by Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, New York,
New York.
S-105
Enforceability
of civil liabilities under the federal securities laws
We are a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of
Panama. In addition, one of our directors, Gerald J. Maier, is a
resident of Canada, and our counsel, Arias, Fabrega &
Fabrega, who will issue opinions for us regarding the validity
of the shares of common stock offered hereby and certain
Panamanian income tax matters, is a law firm located in Panama
City, Panama. Accordingly, it may not be possible to effect
service of process on such parties in the United States and to
enforce judgments against them predicated on the civil liability
provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States.
Because a substantial amount of our assets are located outside
the United States, any judgment obtained in the United States
against us may not be fully collectible in the United States. We
have been advised by Arias, Fabrega & Fabrega that
courts in the Republic of Panama will enforce foreign judgments
for liquidated amounts in civil matters, subject to certain
conditions and exceptions. However, courts in the Republic of
Panama will not enforce in original actions liabilities
predicated solely on the United States federal securities laws.
Our agent for service of process in the United States with
respect to matters arising under the US federal securities laws
is CT Corporation System, 111 Eighth Avenue, New York, New York
10011.
S-106
Index
to consolidated financial statements
Willbros Group,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
F-8
|
|
|
|
|
F-9
|
|
|
|
|
F-11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-54
|
|
|
|
|
F-55
|
|
|
|
|
F-56
|
|
|
|
|
F-57
|
|
|
|
|
F-59
|
|
Integrated
Service Company, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-98
|
|
|
|
|
F-99
|
|
|
|
|
F-100
|
|
|
|
|
F-101
|
|
|
|
|
F-102
|
|
|
|
|
F-103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-109
|
|
|
|
|
F-110
|
|
|
|
|
F-111
|
|
|
|
|
F-112
|
|
|
|
|
F-113
|
|
F-1
Willbros Group,
Inc.
Report
of independent registered public accounting
firm
To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Willbros Group, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Willbros Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and
the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity and comprehensive income (loss), and
cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended
December 31, 2006. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Willbros Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2006
and 2005, and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for each of the years in the two-year period ended
December 31, 2006 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of Willbros Group, Inc.s internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on
criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report
dated March 12, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on
managements assessment of internal control over financial
reporting and an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting.
We have also audited the adjustments to the 2004 consolidated
financial statements to retrospectively apply the change in
accounting, as described in Note 2. In our opinion, such
adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. We
were not engaged to audit, review or apply any procedures to the
2004 financial statements of the Company other than with respect
to the adjustments and, accordingly, we do not express an
opinion or any other form of assurance on the 2004 financial
statements taken as a whole.
We also have audited the adjustments to retrospectively apply
the change in reportable segments reported in Note 12 to
the consolidated financial statements for the years 2006, 2005,
and 2004. In our opinion, such adjustments are appropriate and
have been properly applied. We were not engaged to audit, review
or apply any procedures to the 2004 financial statements of the
Company other than with respect to the adjustments and,
accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of
assurance on the 2004 financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ GLO CPAs, LLP
Houston, Texas
March 12, 2007, except for Note 12 which is as of
September 26, 2007
F-2
Willbros Group,
Inc.
Report of
independent registered public accounting
firm
The Stockholders and Board of Directors
Willbros Group, Inc.:
We have audited, before the effects of the adjustments to
retrospectively apply the change in accounting related to the
discontinued operations as described in Note 2 and the
change in reportable operating segments as described in
Note 12, the consolidated statement of operations,
stockholders equity and comprehensive income (loss), and
cash flows of Willbros Group, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2004. These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements, before
the effects of the adjustments to retrospectively apply the
change in accounting related to the discontinued operations as
described in Note 2 and the change in reportable operating
segments as described in Note 12, present fairly, in all
material respects, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2004, in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
We were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to
the adjustments to retrospectively apply the change in
accounting related to the discontinued operations as described
in Note 2 and the change in reportable operating segments
as described in Note 12, and accordingly, we do not express
an opinion or any other form of assurance about whether such
adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied.
Those adjustments were audited by GLO CPAs, LLP.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Houston, Texas
November 21, 2005
F-3
Willbros Group,
Inc.
Report of
independent registered public accounting
firm
To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Willbros Group, Inc.
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting (Item 9A(b)), that Willbros Group, Inc.
(the Company) did not maintain effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006,
because of the effect of material weaknesses identified in
managements assessment, based on criteria established
in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organization of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible
for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on managements assessment and an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of
control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote
likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The
following material weaknesses have been identified and included
in managements assessment as of December 31, 2006.
Nigeria AccountingDuring the fourth quarter of 2006, the
Company determined that a material weakness in their internal
control over financial reporting exists related to the
Companys management control environment over the
accounting for their Nigeria operations. This weakness in
management control led to the inability to adequately perform
various control functions including supervision over
F-4
Willbros Group,
Inc.
and consistency of: inventory management; petty cash
disbursement; accounts payable disbursement approvals; account
reconciliation; and review of time keeping records. This
weakness resulted primarily due to the Company being unable to
maintain a consistent and stable internal control environment
over its Nigeria operations in the fourth quarter of 2006.
Nigeria Project ControlsEstimate to CompleteA
material weakness exists related to controls over Nigeria
project reporting. This weakness existed throughout 2006 and is
a continuation of a material weakness reported in their 2005
Form 10-K.
The weakness primarily impacted one large Nigeria project with a
total contract value of approximately $165 million, for
which cost estimates were not updated timely in the fourth
quarter of 2006 due to insufficient measures being taken to
independently verify and update reliable cost estimates. This
material weakness specifically resulted in material changes to
revenue and cost of sales during the preparation of their year
end financial statements by their accounting staff prior to the
issuance of the
Form 10-K.
The above material weaknesses were considered in determining the
nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit
of the 2006 consolidated financial statements, and this report
does not affect our report dated March 12, 2007 which
expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company
did not maintain effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, based on criteria established in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Also, in our opinion, because of the effect of the material
weakness described above on the achievement of the objectives of
the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO).
/s/ GLO CPAs, LLP
Houston, Texas
March 12, 2007
F-5
Willbros Group,
Inc.
Consolidated
balance sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
except share
|
|
|
|
and per share
amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
37,643
|
|
|
$
|
55,933
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
137,104
|
|
|
|
84,003
|
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed
|
|
|
11,027
|
|
|
|
7,619
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
17,299
|
|
|
|
11,871
|
|
Parts and supplies inventories
|
|
|
2,069
|
|
|
|
2,509
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
294,192
|
|
|
|
261,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
499,334
|
|
|
|
423,034
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
5,064
|
|
|
|
4,134
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
65,347
|
|
|
|
59,706
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
6,683
|
|
|
|
6,687
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
11,826
|
|
|
|
5,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
588,254
|
|
|
$
|
498,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
5,562
|
|
|
$
|
2,680
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
122,352
|
|
|
|
67,599
|
|
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income
|
|
|
14,947
|
|
|
|
1,342
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
3,556
|
|
|
|
2,368
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
182,092
|
|
|
|
44,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
328,509
|
|
|
|
218,074
|
|
2.75% convertible senior notes
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
6.5% senior convertible notes
|
|
|
84,500
|
|
|
|
65,000
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
7,077
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
490,323
|
|
|
|
353,651
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A preferred stock, par value $.01 per share,
1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.05 per share, 70,000,000 shares
authorized (35,000,000 at December 31, 2005) and
25,848,596 shares issued at December 31, 2006
(21,649,475 at December 31, 2005)
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
217,036
|
|
|
|
161,596
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(120,603
|
)
|
|
|
(15,166
|
)
|
Treasury stock at cost, 167,844 shares at December 31,
2006 (98,863 at December 31, 2005)
|
|
|
(2,154
|
)
|
|
|
(1,163
|
)
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,720
|
)
|
Note receivable for stock purchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
2,360
|
|
|
|
2,836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
97,931
|
|
|
|
145,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
588,254
|
|
|
$
|
498,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Willbros Group,
Inc.
Consolidated
statements of operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
543,259
|
|
|
$
|
294,479
|
|
|
$
|
272,794
|
|
Operating expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
489,494
|
|
|
|
266,072
|
|
|
|
222,357
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
12,430
|
|
|
|
11,688
|
|
|
|
9,776
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
53,366
|
|
|
|
42,350
|
|
|
|
32,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
555,290
|
|
|
|
320,110
|
|
|
|
264,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(12,031
|
)
|
|
|
(25,631
|
)
|
|
|
8,136
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,803
|
|
|
|
1,577
|
|
|
|
868
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(10,068
|
)
|
|
|
(5,481
|
)
|
|
|
(3,348
|
)
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,696
|
)
|
|
|
(3,162
|
)
|
|
|
(2,867
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(19,727
|
)
|
|
|
(28,793
|
)
|
|
|
5,269
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
2,308
|
|
|
|
1,668
|
|
|
|
(1,027
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(22,035
|
)
|
|
|
(30,461
|
)
|
|
|
6,296
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations net of provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
(83,402
|
)
|
|
|
(8,319
|
)
|
|
|
(27,111
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(105,437
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38,780
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,815
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.98
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(3.72
|
)
|
|
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
|
(1.29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(4.70
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.99
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.98
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(3.72
|
)
|
|
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
|
(1.29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(4.70
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.99
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
22,440,742
|
|
|
|
21,258,211
|
|
|
|
20,922,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
22,440,742
|
|
|
|
21,258,211
|
|
|
|
20,922,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
Willbros Group,
Inc.
Consolidated
statements of stockholders equity and comprehensive income
(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common
stock
|
|
|
excess
|
|
|
earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
receivable
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
stock-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
of par
|
|
|
(accumulated
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
stock
|
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
|
holders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
deficit)
|
|
|
stock
|
|
|
compensation
|
|
|
purchases
|
|
|
income(loss)
|
|
|
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
except share amounts)
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2003
|
|
|
20,748,498
|
|
|
$
|
1,037
|
|
|
$
|
149,373
|
|
|
$
|
44,429
|
|
|
$
|
(345
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(982
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,015
|
|
|
$
|
194,527
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,815
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,815
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,236
|
)
|
Payment of notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
Amortization of note discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
Restricted stock grants
|
|
|
183,000
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,321
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures of restricted stock grants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
Issuance of common stock under employee benefit plan
|
|
|
15,603
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
478,879
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
4,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2004
|
|
|
21,425,980
|
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
156,175
|
|
|
|
23,614
|
|
|
|
(555
|
)
|
|
|
(1,639
|
)
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
|
|
1,594
|
|
|
|
180,044
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,780
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,780
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,242
|
|
|
|
1,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,538
|
)
|
Amortization of note discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Restricted stock grants
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
3,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,831
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting restricted stock rights
|
|
|
10,875
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeiture of restricted stock grants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(357
|
)
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to treasury stock, vesting restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,558
|
|
Issuance of common stock under employee benefit plan
|
|
|
3,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
33,750
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005
|
|
|
21,649,475
|
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
161,596
|
|
|
|
(15,166
|
)
|
|
|
(1,163
|
)
|
|
|
(3,720
|
)
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
2,836
|
|
|
|
145,234
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105,437
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105,437
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(476
|
)
|
|
|
(476
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105,913
|
)
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,240
|
|
Amortization of note discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Stock received for note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock grants
|
|
|
168,116
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting of restricted stock rights
|
|
|
12,125
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to treasury stock, vesting restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(748
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(748
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
296,520
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
3,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,382
|
|
Private placement of common stock
|
|
|
3,722,360
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
45,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,325
|
|
Issuance of common stock warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
25,848,596
|
|
|
$
|
1,292
|
|
|
$
|
217,036
|
|
|
$
|
(120,603
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,154
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,360
|
|
|
$
|
97,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-8
Willbros Group,
Inc.
Consolidated
statements of cash flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
except share amounts)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(105,437
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38,780
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,815
|
)
|
Reconciliation of net loss to cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
83,402
|
|
|
|
8,319
|
|
|
|
27,111
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
12,430
|
|
|
|
11,688
|
|
|
|
9,776
|
|
Amortization of debt issue costs
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
|
|
2,920
|
|
|
|
1,846
|
|
Non-cash compensation expense
|
|
|
7,240
|
|
|
|
2,558
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(895
|
)
|
|
|
1,730
|
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
Loss (gain) on sales and retirements of property, plant and
equipment
|
|
|
(3,914
|
)
|
|
|
(910
|
)
|
|
|
378
|
|
Equity in joint ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
10,314
|
|
Amortization of notes receivable discount
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
Provision (credit) for bad debts
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
Provision for inventory obsolescence
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
(54,101
|
)
|
|
|
(27,443
|
)
|
|
|
(8,587
|
)
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed
|
|
|
(3,439
|
)
|
|
|
(6,668
|
)
|
|
|
5,972
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
5,052
|
|
|
|
4,411
|
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
Parts and supplies inventories
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
(8,882
|
)
|
|
|
(1,693
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(3,123
|
)
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
39,117
|
|
|
|
18,961
|
|
|
|
7,215
|
|
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income
|
|
|
13,602
|
|
|
|
(2,290
|
)
|
|
|
(2,705
|
)
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
1,210
|
|
|
|
(1,059
|
)
|
|
|
7,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing
operations
|
|
|
(5,429
|
)
|
|
|
(34,631
|
)
|
|
|
38,676
|
|
Net cash flows used in operating activities of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(97,923
|
)
|
|
|
(2,486
|
)
|
|
|
(1,266
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(103,352
|
)
|
|
|
(37,117
|
)
|
|
|
37,410
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
|
|
|
3,663
|
|
|
|
1,740
|
|
|
|
1,274
|
|
Proceeds from sales of discontinued operations
|
|
|
48,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(11,373
|
)
|
|
|
(18,706
|
)
|
|
|
(15,733
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing
operations
|
|
|
40,804
|
|
|
|
(16,966
|
)
|
|
|
(14,459
|
)
|
Net cash flows used in investing activities of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(7,431
|
)
|
|
|
(19,998
|
)
|
|
|
(22,292
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
33,373
|
|
|
|
(36,964
|
)
|
|
|
(36,751
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from private placement of equity
|
|
|
48,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
3,382
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
4,381
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of 6.5% senior convertible notes
|
|
|
19,500
|
|
|
|
65,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of 2.75% convertible senior notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from notes payable to banks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,924
|
|
|
|
2,490
|
|
Repayment of notes payable to banks
|
|
|
(12,135
|
)
|
|
|
(4,400
|
)
|
|
|
(3,323
|
)
|
Costs of debt issuance
|
|
|
(6,306
|
)
|
|
|
(1,474
|
)
|
|
|
(6,176
|
)
|
Payment of capital leases
|
|
|
(891
|
)
|
|
|
(6,405
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of treasury stock
|
|
|
(748
|
)
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,000
|
)
|
|
|
(14,000
|
)
|
Collection of notes receivable for stock purchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by financing activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
51,550
|
|
|
|
56,830
|
|
|
|
54,362
|
|
Net cash flows provided by financing activities of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
51,550
|
|
|
|
56,830
|
|
|
|
54,362
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(829
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(18,290
|
)
|
|
|
(17,234
|
)
|
|
|
54,192
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
55,933
|
|
|
|
73,167
|
|
|
|
18,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-9
Willbros Group,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
except share amounts)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$
|
37,643
|
|
|
$
|
55,933
|
|
|
$
|
73,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest (including discontinued operations)
|
|
$
|
7,590
|
|
|
$
|
2,421
|
|
|
$
|
1,514
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes (including discontinued operations)
|
|
$
|
11,782
|
|
|
$
|
15,887
|
|
|
$
|
2,393
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment obtained by capital lease
|
|
$
|
12,108
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Prepaid insurance obtained by note payable
|
|
$
|
10,620
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Treasury stock acquired for forfeited restricted stock grants
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
357
|
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
Settlement of officer note receivable for stock
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Distribution of property by joint ventures
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
737
|
|
Receivable obtained by sale of discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
3,300
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-10
Notes
to consolidated financial statements
(In thousands,
except share and per share amounts)
|
|
1.
|
SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
CompanyWillbros Group, Inc.
(WGI), a Republic of Panama corporation, and all of
its majority-owned subsidiaries (the Company)
provide construction, engineering, specialty services and
development activities to the oil, gas and power industries and
government entities. The Companys principal markets for
continuing operations are the United States, Canada, and the
Middle East. The disclosures in the notes to consolidated
financial statements relate to continuing operations, except as
otherwise indicated.
Basis of Presentation of Discontinuance of Operations and
Asset DisposalDuring 2006, the Company chose to
exit the following businesses: Nigeria, Venezuela, and the TXP-4
Plant, (collectively the Discontinued Operations),
and accordingly, these businesses are presented as discontinued
operations in the preceding consolidated financial statements.
The net assets and net liabilities related to the Discontinued
Operations are shown on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as
components of Assets of discontinued operations and
Liabilities of discontinued operations,
respectively. The results of the Discontinued Operations are
shown on the Consolidated Statements of Operations as a
component of Loss from discontinued operations net of
provision for income taxes, for all periods shown.
Principles of ConsolidationThe consolidated
financial statements of the Company include the accounts of WGI
and all of its majority-owned subsidiaries. Inter-company
accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. The
ownership interest of minority participants in subsidiaries that
are not wholly-owned (principally in Oman) is included in
accounts payable and accrued liabilities and is not material.
The minority participants share of the net income of those
subsidiaries is included in contract costs. Interest in the
Companys unconsolidated joint ventures is accounted for
using the equity method in the consolidated balance sheet.
Restatement of Consolidated Financial
StatementsIn late December 2004, the Company
became aware of improprieties in the Companys Bolivian
subsidiary related to assessment of certain Bolivian taxes and
allegations that the subsidiary had filed improper tax returns.
Upon learning of the tax assessment and alleged improprieties,
the Company commenced an initial investigation into the matter
and notified the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors,
which retained independent counsel, who in turn retained
forensic accountants, and began an independent investigation.
Concurrent with the Audit Committees investigation, the
Company initiated its own review of the Companys
accounting. This review focused primarily on the Companys
international activities supervised by J. Kenneth Tillery, the
former President of Willbros International, Inc.
(WII), the primary international subsidiary of the
Company, but also included other areas of the Companys
accounting activities.
As a result of the investigations and the Companys
accounting review, the Company determined that several members
of the senior management of WII and its subsidiaries
collaborated to misappropriate assets from the Company and cover
up such activity. It was determined that the Bolivian subsidiary
had in fact filed improper tax returns, or failed to file
returns, at the direction of Mr. Tillery. The investigation
also determined that Mr. Tillery, in collusion with several
members of management of the international subsidiaries, was
involved in a pattern of improper activities, primarily in the
Companys Nigeria subsidiaries, which was specifically
contrary to established Company policies, internal controls and
possibly the laws of several countries, including the United
States.
Use of EstimatesThe consolidated financial
statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States and include certain
estimates and assumptions by management of the Company in the
preparation of the consolidated financial statements. These
estimates and assumptions relate to the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense
during the period. Significant items subject to such estimates
and assumptions include the carrying amount of property, plant
and equipment, goodwill and parts and supplies inventories;
quantification of amounts recorded
F-11
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
for contingencies, tax accruals and certain other accrued
liabilities; valuation allowances for accounts receivable and
deferred income tax assets; and revenue recognition under the
percentage-of-completion method of accounting, including
estimates of progress toward completion and estimates of gross
profit or loss accrual on contracts in progress. The Company
bases its estimates on historical experience and other
assumptions that it believes relevant under the circumstances.
Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Commitments and ContingenciesLiabilities for
loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation,
fines, penalties, and other sources are recorded when management
assesses that it is probable that a liability has been incurred
and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Recoveries of costs
from third parties, which management assesses are probable of
realization, are separately recorded as assets in other assets.
Legal costs incurred in connection with matters relating to
contingencies are expensed in the period incurred.
Accounts ReceivableTrade accounts receivable
are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest.
The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Companys best
estimate of the probable amount of credit losses in the
Companys existing accounts receivable. A considerable
amount of judgment is required in assessing the realization of
receivables. Relevant assessment factors include the
creditworthiness of the customer and prior collection history.
Balances over 90 days past due and over a specified minimum
amount are reviewed individually for collectibility. Account
balances are charged off against the allowance after all means
of collection are exhausted and the potential for recovery is
considered remote. The allowance requirements are based on the
most current facts available and are re-evaluated and adjusted
on a regular basis and as additional information is received.
The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure
related to its customers.
InventoriesInventories, consisting primarily
of parts and supplies, are stated at the lower of cost or
market. Cost is determined using the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method. Parts and supplies are
evaluated at least annually and adjusted for excess and
obsolescence. Parts and supplies related to continuing
operations were valued at $2,069 and $2,509 at December 31,
2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. No excess or
obsolescence allowances existed at December 31, 2006 or
2005.
Other Operating ExpenseOther operating
expense consists of the costs incurred by the Company associated
with fraudulent invoices for fictitious supplies or services.
See
Note 2-Restatement,
in the Companys 2004 Annual Report
Form 10-K.
Property, Plant and EquipmentProperty, plant
and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation, including
amortization of capital leases, is provided on the straight-line
method using estimated lives as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Construction equipment
|
|
|
4-6 years
|
|
Marine equipment
|
|
|
10 years
|
|
Transportation equipment
|
|
|
3-4 years
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
20 years
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
3-10 years
|
|
Assets held under capital leases and leasehold improvements are
amortized on a straight-line basis. When assets are retired or
otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated
depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting
gain or loss is recognized in income for the period. Normal
repair and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred.
Significant renewals and betterments are capitalized. Long-lived
assets are reviewed for impairment annually and whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be
held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount
of the asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated
by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the
impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which
the
F-12
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the
assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of
the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
GoodwillGoodwill represents the excess of
purchase price over fair value of net assets acquired. Goodwill
is not amortized but instead is annually tested for impairment.
Annual testing for impairment occurs during the fourth quarter
of the fiscal year and more frequently if an event or
circumstance indicates that an impairment has occurred. The
impairment test involves determining the fair market value of
each of the reporting units with which the goodwill is
associated and comparing the estimated fair market value of each
of the reporting units with its carrying amount. The Company
completed its annual evaluation for impairment of goodwill as of
December 31, 2006, and determined that no impairment of
goodwill existed as of that date.
RevenueA number of factors relating to the
Companys business affect the recognition of contract
revenue. The Company typically structures contracts as
fixed-price, unit-price, material and time or cost plus fixed
fee. Revenue from unit-price and time and material contracts is
recognized as earned. The Company believes that its operating
results should be evaluated over a time horizon during which
major contracts in progress are completed and change orders,
extra work, variations in the scope of work and cost recoveries
and other claims are negotiated and realized.
Revenue for fixed-price and cost plus fixed fee contracts is
recognized on the percentage-of-completion method. Under this
method, estimated contract income and resulting revenue is
generally accrued based on costs incurred to date as a
percentage of total estimated costs, taking into consideration
physical completion. Total estimated costs, and thus contract
income, are impacted by changes in productivity, scheduling, the
unit cost of labor, subcontracts, materials and equipment.
Additionally, external factors such as weather, client needs,
client delays in providing permits and approvals, labor
availability, governmental regulation and politics may affect
the progress of a projects completion and thus the timing
of revenue recognition. The Company does not recognize income on
a fixed-price contract until the contract is approximately
5 percent to 10 percent complete, depending upon the
nature of the contract. If a current estimate of total contract
cost indicates a loss on a contract, the projected loss is
recognized in full when determined.
The Company considers unapproved change orders to be contract
variations on which the Company has customer approval for scope
change, but not for price associated with that scope change.
Costs associated with unapproved change orders are included in
the estimated cost to complete the contracts and are expensed as
incurred. The Company recognizes revenue equal to cost incurred
on unapproved changed orders when realization of price approval
is probable and the estimated amount is equal to or greater than
the Companys cost related to the unapproved change order.
Revenue recognized on unapproved change orders is included in
Contract costs and recognized income not yet billed on the
balance sheet.
Unapproved change orders involve the use of estimates, and it is
reasonably possible that revisions to the estimated costs and
recoverable amounts may be required in the future reporting
periods to reflect the changes in estimates or final agreement
with customers.
The Company considers claims to be amounts the Company seeks or
will seek to collect from customers or others for
customer-caused changes in contract specifications or design, or
other customer-related causes of unanticipated additional
contract costs on which there is no agreement with customers on
both scope and price changes. Revenue from claims is recognized
when agreement is reached with customers as to the value of the
claims, which in some instances may not occur until after
completion of work under the contract. Costs associated with
claims are included in the estimated costs to complete the
contracts and are expensed when incurred.
Income TaxesThe Company accounts for income
taxes by the asset and liability method under which deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax
consequences of operating loss and tax credit carry forwards and
temporary differences between the financial statement carrying
values of
F-13
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. The
provision or benefit for income taxes and the annual effective
tax rate are impacted by income taxes in certain countries (in
discontinued operations) being computed based on a deemed profit
rather than on taxable income and tax holidays on certain
international projects.
Retirement Plans and BenefitsThe Company has
a voluntary defined contribution retirement plan for
U.S. based employees that is qualified, and is contributory
on the part of the employees, and a voluntary savings plan for
certain international employees that is non-qualified, and is
contributory on the part of the employees.
Stock-Based CompensationEffective
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value
recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment, using the modified prospective application
method. Under this method, compensation cost is recognized for
the applicable amounts of: (a) compensation expense of all
share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of,
January 1, 2006 (based on the grant-date fair value
estimated in accordance with the original provisions of
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, and previously presented in the pro forma
footnote disclosures in the Companys SEC reports), and
(b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted
subsequent to January 1, 2006 (based on the grant-date fair
value estimated in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 123R). The Company uses the Black-Scholes
valuation method to determine the fair value of stock options
granted as of the grant date.
Foreign Currency TranslationAll significant
monetary asset and liability accounts denominated in currencies
other than United States dollars are translated into United
States dollars at current exchange rates for countries in which
the local currency is the functional currency. Translation
adjustments are accumulated in other comprehensive income
(loss). Non-monetary assets and liabilities in highly
inflationary economies are translated into United States dollars
at historical exchange rates. Revenue and expense accounts are
converted at prevailing rates throughout the year. Foreign
currency translation adjustments and translation adjustments in
highly inflationary economies are recorded in income.
Concentration of Credit RiskThe Company has
a concentration of customers in the oil, gas and power
industries which exposes the Company to a concentration of
credit risk within a single industry. The Company seeks to
obtain advance and progress payments for contract work performed
on major contracts. Receivables are generally not
collateralized. The allowance for doubtful accounts, including
that in discontinued operations, increased in 2006 to $10,389
from $6,672 in 2005. The Company believes the allowance for
doubtful accounts is adequate.
Fair Value of Financial InstrumentsThe
carrying value of financial instruments does not materially
differ from fair value.
Capitalized InterestThe Company capitalizes
interest as part of the cost of significant assets constructed
or developed for its own use. Capitalized interest was $57,
$168, and $349 in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Income (Loss) per Common ShareBasic income
(loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss),
less any preferred dividend requirements, by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the
year. Diluted income (loss) per share is calculated by including
the weighted-average number of all potentially dilutive common
shares with the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding.
Derivative Financial InstrumentsThe Company
may use derivative financial instruments such as forward
contracts, options or other financial instruments as hedges to
mitigate
non-U.S. currency
exchange risk when the Company is unable to match
non-U.S. currency
revenue with expense in the same currency. The Company had no
derivative financial instruments as of December 31, 2006 or
2005.
F-14
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
Cash EquivalentsThe Company considers all
highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three
months or less to be cash equivalents.
Cash flows from investing activitiesThe
proceeds from sale of discontinued operations for the year ended
December 31, 2006 includes $16,532 of non-refundable
payments to be applied to the sale of Nigeria assets and
operations.
Recently Issued Accounting
StandardsFIN No. 48In June
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,
(FIN 48) an interpretation of
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes
(SFAS No. 109). This interpretation
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in an enterprises financial statements in
accordance with SFAS No. 109. The interpretation
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and
also provides guidance on derecognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition. The provisions of FIN 48 are
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31,
2006. The Company is currently evaluating what impact, if any,
this statement will have on its financial statements.
SFAS No. 157In September 2006, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS No. 157).
SFAS No. 157 clarifies the principle that fair value
should be based on the assumptions market participants would use
when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value
hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those
assumptions. SFAS No. 157 is effective for the
Companys fiscal year beginning January 1, 2007. The
Company is currently evaluating what impact, if any, this
statement will have on its financial statements.
FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. AUG
AIR-1On September 7, 2006 the FASB issued this
amendment to certain provisions in the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Industry Guide,
Audits of Airlines, and Accounting Principles Board
(APB) Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial
Reporting. This FSP prohibits the use of the
accrue-in-advance
method of accounting for planned major maintenance activities in
annual and interim financial reporting periods. The guidance in
this FSP shall be applied to the first fiscal year beginning
after December 15, 2006. The Company intends to adopt this
standard for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2007. The
Company is currently evaluating what impact, if any, this
amendment will have on its financial statements, including the
potential impact to retrospective periods.
ReclassificationCertain reclassifications
have been made to prior year balances to conform to current year
presentations.
|
|
2.
|
DISCONTINUANCE OF
OPERATIONS AND ASSET DISPOSAL
|
Strategic
decisions
As part of the Companys ongoing strategic evaluation of
operations, the following businesses have been discontinued:
Nigeria, Venezuela, and the TXP-4 Plant, collectively the
Discontinued Operations, and accordingly, these
businesses are presented as discontinued operations in the
preceding consolidated financial statements. The net assets and
net liabilities related to the Discontinued Operations are shown
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as Assets of
discontinued operations and Liabilities of
discontinued operations, respectively. The results of the
Discontinued Operations are shown on the Consolidated Statements
of Operations as Loss from discontinued operations net of
provision for income taxes for all periods shown.
The separate results of the Discontinued Operations, as well as
a breakdown of the major classes of assets and liabilities
included as part of Discontinued Operations, are detailed in the
subsequent tables.
F-15
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
Nigeria
On February 7, 2007, the Company sold its Nigeria
operations through a share purchase agreement for total
consideration of $155,250. In conjunction with this transaction,
the Company bought out certain minority interests at a total
cost of $10,500. See Note 17Subsequent Events for
more information on the sale.
Nigeria operations and assets were previously included in the
Companys former International segment and
retrospectively presented as discontinued operations on the
Companys
Form 8-K
filed December 8, 2006.
As part of the sales process, the Company continues to evaluate
the carrying value of the Nigeria assets and operations with
respect to their estimated market value. As of December 31,
2006, the Company did not recognize an impairment of the Nigeria
assets based upon this analysis. Any impairment would be
included in the Loss from discontinued operations net of
provision for income taxes.
Pipe
coating joint venture
Kanssen International Pipe Coating Services Limited
(Kanssen) and Willbros West Africa, Inc.
(WWAI) a subsidiary of the Company entered into an
agreement to upgrade facilities at the WWAI Choba pipe coating
facility. The agreement was signed in June 2006 and included an
installation of new concrete weight coating equipment furnished
by Kanssen. WWAI and Kanssen participate in the venture with a
50 percent interest for each party with WWAI being paid a
management fee on each contract not to exceed 9 percent of
the contract revenue. Currently, the pipe coating transactions
are included in the revenues and expenses of the related WWAI
projects. In 2006, the pipe coating facility had approximately
$16.5 million in contract revenue.
Venezuela
Asset disposalOn August 17, 2006, the
Company entered into a share purchase agreement with a
Venezuelan company (the Venezuelan Buyer), pursuant
to which the Company sold all of its membership interests in
Willbros (Barbados) Limited, Inc. (WBL), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. WBL owns all of the
assets and operations of the Company in Venezuela, with the
exception of joint-venture interest in Harwat International
Finance Corporation NV (Harwat). The Company
received cash payments of $7,000 for conveyance of WBL with no
gain recognized subject to the pending sale discussed below. The
Venezuela operations and assets were previously a component of
the Companys former International segment and are
retrospectively presented as discontinued operations in the
Companys
Form 8-K
filed December 8, 2006.
Joint-venture interest disposalAs part of
the share purchase agreement, the Venezuelan Buyer agreed to
purchase the Companys 10 percent interest in Harwat,
as well as assume all guarantees of the Company related to the
10 percent interest in Harwat. The sale of the Harwat
interest was completed November 28, 2006. The Company
received a commitment from the Venezuelan Buyer to pay $3,300
before December 4, 2013. The present value of this
commitment is $1,775.
The Company estimates no gain or loss on the sale of WBL and its
10 percent interest in Harwat.
TXP-4
plant
Asset disposalOn January 12, 2006, the
Company entered into a purchase agreement and release with
Williams Field Services Company (Williams), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of The Williams Companies, Inc.,
pursuant to which the Company sold to Williams all of its
membership interest in Opal TXP-4 Company, LLC, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company (the LLC). The LLC owns a
gas processing plant known as the TXP-4 Plant (the TXP-4
Plant) at Opal in Lincoln County, Wyoming, in addition to
certain facilities, equipment and supplies related to the TXP-4
Plant. Prior to the sale, the TXP-4 Plant was a component of the
former US & Canada segment and is
retrospectively presented as
F-16
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
discontinued operations on the Companys
Form 8-K
filed December 8, 2006. The Company received cash payments
of $27,944 for conveyance of the LLC and realized a gain of
$1,342, net of taxes of $691, reflected as a component of the
Loss from discontinued operations net of provision for
income taxes.
In addition to the cash payments described above, Williams
agreed to pay the Company a portion of any recovery that
Williams may obtain based on damages, loss or injury related to
the TXP-4 Plant up to $3,400. This settlement is contingent upon
Williams recovery from various third parties and is the
only ongoing potential source of cash flows subsequent to the
Purchase Agreement date. The timing and amount of any resolution
to these claims cannot be estimated.
Results of
discontinued operations
Condensed Statements of Operations of the Discontinued
Operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
|
Opal
TXP-4
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
447,757
|
|
|
$
|
270
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
448,027
|
|
Operating expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
473,479
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
474,041
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,569
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,947
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
31,620
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508,668
|
|
|
|
1,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
509,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(60,911
|
)
|
|
|
(992
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,903
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(11,579
|
)
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
2,033
|
|
|
(9,382
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(72,490
|
)
|
|
|
(828
|
)
|
|
|
2,033
|
|
|
(71,285
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
11,283
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
12,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(83,773
|
)
|
|
$
|
(971
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,342
|
|
$
|
(83,402
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
|
Opal
TXP-4
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
386,723
|
|
|
$
|
565
|
|
|
$
|
24,755
|
|
$
|
412,043
|
|
Operating expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
337,234
|
|
|
|
1,492
|
|
|
|
19,758
|
|
|
358,484
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
8,270
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
9,898
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
32,552
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,080
|
|
Other operating expense
|
|
|
1,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379,140
|
|
|
|
2,610
|
|
|
|
20,796
|
|
|
402,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
7,583
|
|
|
|
(2,045
|
)
|
|
|
3,959
|
|
|
9,497
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(1,408
|
)
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,176
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
6,175
|
|
|
|
(1,813
|
)
|
|
|
3,959
|
|
|
8,321
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
15,296
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
|
16,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(9,121
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,811
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,613
|
|
$
|
(8,319
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-17
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
|
Opal
TXP-4
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
171,558
|
|
|
$
|
17,750
|
|
|
$
|
21,216
|
|
$
|
210,524
|
|
Operating expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
166,933
|
|
|
|
12,629
|
|
|
|
15,752
|
|
|
195,314
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,473
|
|
|
|
797
|
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
6,971
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
13,468
|
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,089
|
|
Other operating expense
|
|
|
3,571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,445
|
|
|
|
14,047
|
|
|
|
16,453
|
|
|
219,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(17,887
|
)
|
|
|
3,703
|
|
|
|
4,763
|
|
|
(9,421
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(6,929
|
)
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,599
|
)
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(24,816
|
)
|
|
|
4,033
|
|
|
|
4,763
|
|
|
(16,020
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
8,483
|
|
|
|
989
|
|
|
|
1,619
|
|
|
11,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(33,299
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,044
|
|
|
$
|
3,144
|
|
$
|
(27,111
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nigeria
income taxes
In Nigeria, the Company is subject to a deemed profit tax, which
creates tax provisions based on gross revenue rather than
pre-tax income.
Nigeria
federal tax audit
The Companys operations in Nigeria have been under audit
by the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) for
taxable years 1998 through 2004. The primary issues being
investigated are related to transfer the pricing and
unsubstantiated expenses. At this time, the Company estimates a
possible additional tax liability in the range of $1,200 to
$5,000. Based on current financial information, there is no
better estimate of tax liability associated with the FIRS audit.
Because there is no better estimate at this time, and because
the Company does not expect to resolve this audit within one
year, the Company has recorded a deferred income tax liability
of $1,200.
Nigeria
national labor contract
The previous Nigerian national labor contract, covering
approximately 1,600 national laborers at the Companys
Choba Site 1 facility expired in March 2006. A replacement
agreement executed in May 2006 mistakenly included labor rate
increases ranging between 300 percent to 350 percent
which the labor union claims are binding upon the Company
notwithstanding the obvious mistake in fact and other legal
deficiencies in the form and substance of the replacement
agreement (the May Agreement). However, based upon
opinions of legal counsel in Nigeria, for a variety of reasons
the Company believes the May Agreement is unenforceable in its
current form and the Company and its legal counsel are pursuing
measures to rectify the mistake and related deficiencies in the
purported agreement, including, without limitation, through
negotiation, mediation, and judicial actions provided for under
the labor laws of Nigeria. During this rectification process,
however, the Company has voluntarily increased the labor rate by
20 percent. An accrued liability of $5,514 has been
recorded at December 31, 2006 to reflect the Companys
current estimate of additional end-of-service costs attributable
to reaching a mutually acceptable final form of labor agreement.
Although the Company does not currently anticipate that the May
Agreement will be determined to be enforceable in its current
mistaken form, should rectification of that agreement be
unsuccessful through the labor relations and related legal
processes now underway, a substantially greater monthly labor
expense would be incurred by the Company and an estimated
additional $26,000 of end-of-service liability would result.
Also, this rectification process now underway by the Company has
incited protests and strikes from the rank and
F-18
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
file workers covered by the May Agreement. The labor union has
complained to national, local and regional politicians and the
matter will be heard by the Labor Board to be resolved.
Balance sheets of
discontinued operations
Condensed Balance Sheets of the Discontinued Operations are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opal
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
TXP-4
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
12,964
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,964
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
36,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,683
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
76,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,673
|
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed
|
|
|
79,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,364
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
16,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,017
|
|
Parts and supplies inventories
|
|
|
21,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
243,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,346
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
50,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,723
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
294,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,192
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
148,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,135
|
|
Loss provision on contracts
|
|
|
33,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
182,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets of discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
112,100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
112,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opal
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
|
TXP-4
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
9,514
|
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,648
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
93,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,667
|
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed
|
|
|
36,392
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,424
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
14,716
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,879
|
|
Parts and supplies inventories
|
|
|
16,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
171,107
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,436
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
52,200
|
|
|
|
4,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,554
|
|
Asset held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,049
|
|
|
|
23,049
|
|
Investments in joint ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,961
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
5,256
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
228,563
|
|
|
|
9,487
|
|
|
|
23,049
|
|
|
|
261,099
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
142,171
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,669
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
|
1,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
142,171
|
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
|
144,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets of discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
86,392
|
|
|
$
|
8,453
|
|
|
$
|
22,169
|
|
|
$
|
117,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-19
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
Cash
Discontinued Operations in Nigeria had $36,683 of restricted
cash at December 31, 2006. This amount was in a consortium
bank account that requires the approval of the Company and its
consortium partner to disburse funds. Additionally, cash and
cash equivalents for Nigeria contained $9,482 that was
designated to specific project uses.
Inventory
Discontinued Operations in Nigeria had parts and supplies
inventories of $21,645 and $16,818 net of reserves of
$12,159 and $5,052 at December 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005, respectively.
Loss
provision on contracts
The Company has recognized $33,957 of estimated losses related
to two projects in Nigeria as of December 31, 2006.
Contingencies,
Commitments and Other Circumstances
At December 31, 2006, other assets and accounts receivable
of the Discontinued Operations include anticipated recoveries
from insurance or third parties of $1,191 primarily related to
the repair of pipelines. The Company believes the recovery of
these costs from insurance or other parties is probable. Actual
recoveries may vary from these estimates.
At December 31, 2006, the Company had approximately $22,625
of letters of credit outstanding associated with the
Discontinued Operations representing the maximum amount of
future payments the Company could be required to make. See
Note 13Contingencies, Commitments and Other
Circumstances for additional information on letters of credit
and insurance bonds. The Company had no liability recorded as of
December 31, 2006, related to these commitments.
Accounts receivable, net as of December 31, 2006 and 2005
is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
|
|
$
|
109,880
|
|
|
$
|
58,683
|
|
Contract retention
|
|
|
14,637
|
|
|
|
6,063
|
|
Unbilled revenue
|
|
|
12,598
|
|
|
|
14,766
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
5,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable
|
|
|
137,702
|
|
|
|
84,519
|
|
LessAllowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(598
|
)
|
|
|
(516
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
137,104
|
|
|
$
|
84,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company expects all accounts receivable to be collected
within one year. The provision (credit) for bad debts included
in Other, net on the Consolidated Statement of
Operations was $517, $586 and $(262) for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Contract costs and recognized income not yet billed on
uncompleted contracts arise when revenues have been recorded but
the amounts cannot be billed under the terms of the contracts.
Such amounts are recoverable from customers upon various
measures of performance, including achievement of certain
milestones, completion of specified units or completion of the
contract. Also included in contract cost and recognized income
not yet billed on uncompleted contracts are amounts the Company
seeks to collect from customers for change orders approved in
scope but not for price associated with that scope change
(unapproved change orders). Revenue for these amounts are
recorded equal to cost incurred
F-20
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
when realization of price approval is probable and the estimated
amount is equal to or greater than the Companys cost
related to the unapproved change order. Unapproved change orders
involve the use of estimates, and it is reasonably possible that
revisions to the estimated recoverable amounts of recorded
unapproved change orders may be made in the near-term. If the
Company does not successfully resolve these matters, a net
expense (recorded as a reduction in revenues), may be required,
in addition to amounts that have been previously provided for.
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed and related
amounts billed as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Costs incurred on contracts in progress
|
|
$
|
188,030
|
|
|
$
|
122,935
|
|
Recognized income
|
|
|
12,039
|
|
|
|
6,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,069
|
|
|
|
129,753
|
|
Progress billings and advance payments
|
|
|
(203,989
|
)
|
|
|
(123,476
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,920
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed
|
|
$
|
11,027
|
|
|
$
|
7,619
|
|
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income
|
|
|
(14,947
|
)
|
|
|
(1,342
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,920
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed includes
$1,191 and $1,470 at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, on completed contracts.
5. PROPERTY,
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment, which are used to secure debt or
are subject to lien, at cost, as of December 31, 2006 and
2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Construction equipment
|
|
$
|
53,932
|
|
|
$
|
47,773
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
28,378
|
|
|
|
27,931
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
|
26,047
|
|
|
|
25,018
|
|
Transportation equipment
|
|
|
20,874
|
|
|
|
21,612
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
14,956
|
|
|
|
13,768
|
|
Marine equipment
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,288
|
|
|
|
136,292
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(78,941
|
)
|
|
|
(76,586
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
65,347
|
|
|
$
|
59,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in land and buildings is $1,446 and $0 at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, for the cost of
property which has been capitalized under capital leases.
Additionally, included in construction equipment is $10,662 and
$0 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, for the
cost of new construction equipment which has been capitalized
under capital leases.
F-21
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
|
|
6.
|
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities as of December 31,
2006 and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
$
|
81,823
|
|
|
$
|
49,745
|
|
Payroll and payroll liabilities
|
|
|
18,312
|
|
|
|
12,703
|
|
Advances
|
|
|
16,566
|
|
|
|
983
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
791
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
Provision for loss contracts costs
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
4,366
|
|
|
|
3,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
122,352
|
|
|
$
|
67,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006 the advances account included
$16,532 of non-refundable payments to be applied to the sale of
the Nigeria assets and operations. See
Note 17Subsequent Events, for discussion of the sale.
Long-term debt as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
6.5% senior convertible notes
|
|
$
|
84,500
|
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
2.75% convertible senior notes
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
11,601
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
Other obligations
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
2,636
|
|
2006 Credit Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
166,152
|
|
|
|
138,020
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(4,575
|
)
|
|
|
(2,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
161,577
|
|
|
$
|
135,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
Credit Facility
On October 27, 2006, Willbros USA, Inc., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company, entered into a new $100,000
three-year senior secured synthetic credit facility (the
2006 Credit Facility) with a group of lenders led by
Calyon New York Branch (Calyon). The 2006 Credit
Facility replaces the Companys 2004 Credit Facility. The
Company may elect to increase the total capacity under the 2006
Credit Facility to $150,000, with consent from Calyon. The
Company currently has a commitment from Calyon, which expires
August 7, 2007 to underwrite an increase to the 2006 Credit
Facility by $25,000 subject to certain terms and conditions. The
Company will increase the 2006 Credit Facility only if it has
requirements to issue letters of credit in excess of $100,000.
The 2006 Credit Facility may be used for standby and commercial
letters of credit, borrowings or a combination thereof.
Borrowings, which may be made up to $25,000 less the amount of
any letter of credit advances or financial letters of credit,
must be repaid at least once a year and no new revolving
advances made for a period of 10 consecutive business days
thereafter.
Fees payable under the 2006 Credit Facility include a facility
fee at a rate per annum equal to 5.0 percent of the 2006
Credit Facility capacity, payable quarterly in arrears (the
facility fee will be reduced to 2.75 percent if the Company
obtains a rating from S&P and Moodys greater than B
and B2, respectively), and a letter of credit fee equal to
0.125 percent per annum of aggregate commitments. Interest
on any borrowings is payable quarterly in arrears at the
adjusted base rate minus 1.00 percent or at a Eurodollar
rate at the Companys option. The 2006 Credit Facility is
collateralized by substantially all of the Companys
assets, including stock of the Companys principal
subsidiaries. The
F-22
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
2006 Credit Facility contains a requirement for the maintenance
of a $10,000 minimum cash balance, prohibits the payment of cash
dividends and includes customary affirmative and negative
covenants, such as limitations on the creation of certain new
indebtedness and liens, restrictions on certain transactions and
payments and maintenance of a maximum senior leverage ratio, a
minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and minimum tangible net
worth requirement. A default may be triggered by events such as
failure to comply with financial covenants or other covenants, a
failure to make payments when due, a failure to make payments
when due in respect of or a failure to perform obligations
relating to debt obligations in excess of $5,000, a change of
control of the Company or certain insolvency proceedings as
defined by the 2006 Credit Facility. The 2006 Credit Facility is
guaranteed by the Company and certain other subsidiaries.
Unamortized costs associated with the creation of the 2006
Credit Facility total $1,986 and are included in other assets at
December 31, 2006. These costs are being amortized to
general and administrative expense over the three-year term of
the credit facility ending October 2009.
As of December 31, 2006, there were no borrowings
outstanding under the 2006 Credit Facility and there were
$64,545 in outstanding letters of credit, consisting of $41,920
issued for projects in continuing operations and $22,625 issued
for projects related to discontinued operations.
6.5% Senior
Convertible Notes
On December 22, 2005, the Company entered into a purchase
agreement (the Purchase Agreement) for a private
placement of $65,000 aggregate principal amount of its
6.5% Senior Convertible Notes due 2012 (the
6.5% Notes). The private placement closed on
December 23, 2005. During the first quarter of 2006, the
initial purchasers of the 6.5% Notes exercised their
options to purchase an additional $19,500 aggregate principal
amount of the 6.5% Notes. Collectively, the primary
offering and the purchase option of the 6.5% Notes total
$84,500. The net proceeds of the offering were used to retire
existing indebtedness and provide additional liquidity to
support working capital needs.
The 6.5% Notes are governed by an indenture dated
December 23, 2005 and were entered into by and among the
Company, as issuer, Willbros USA, Inc., as guarantor
(WUSAI), and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (the
Indenture), and were issued under the Purchase
Agreement by and among the Company and the initial purchasers of
the 6.5% Notes (the Purchasers), in a
transaction exempt from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities
Act).
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company and WUSAI have
agreed to indemnify the Purchasers, their affiliates and agents,
against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the
Securities Act.
The 6.5% Notes are convertible into shares of the
Companys common stock at a conversion rate of
56.9606 shares of common stock per $1,000.00 principal
amount of notes (representing a conversion price of
approximately $17.56 per share resulting in
4,813,171 shares at December 31, 2006), subject to
adjustment in certain circumstances. The 6.5% Notes are
general senior unsecured obligations. Interest is to be paid
semi-annually on June 15 and December 15, beginning
June 15, 2006.
The 6.5% Notes mature on December 15, 2012 unless the
notes are repurchased or converted earlier. The Company does not
have the right to redeem the 6.5% Notes. The holders of the
6.5% Notes have the right to require the Company to
purchase the 6.5% Notes for cash, including unpaid
interest, on December 15, 2010. The holders of the
6.5% Notes also have the right to require the Company to
purchase the 6.5% Notes for cash upon the occurrence of a
fundamental change, as defined in the Indenture. In addition to
the amounts described above, the Company will be required to pay
a make-whole premium to the holders of the
6.5% Notes who elect to convert their notes into the
Companys common stock in connection with the fundamental
change. The make-whole premium is payable in addition to shares
of common stock and is calculated based on a formula with the
premium ranging from 0 percent to 31.4 percent
depending on when the fundamental change occurs and the price of
the Companys stock at the time the fundamental change
occurs.
F-23
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
Upon conversion of the 6.5% Notes, the Company has the
right to deliver, in lieu of shares of its common stock, cash or
a combination of cash and shares of its common stock. Under the
indenture, the Company is required to notify holders of the
6.5% Notes of its method for settling the principal amount
of the 6.5% Notes upon conversion. This notification, once
provided, is irrevocable and legally binding upon the Company
with regard to any conversion of the 6.5% Notes. On
March 21, 2006, the Company notified holders of the
6.5% Notes of its election to satisfy its conversion
obligation with respect to the principal amount of any
6.5% Notes surrendered for conversion by paying the holders
of such surrendered 6.5% Notes 100 percent of the
principal conversion obligation in the form of common stock of
the Company. Until the 6.5% Notes are surrendered for
conversion, the Company will not be required to notify holders
of its method for settling the excess amount of the conversion
obligation relating to the amount of the conversion value above
the principal amount, if any. In the event of a default of
$10,000 or more on any credit agreement, including the 2004
Credit Facility and the 2.75% Notes, a corresponding event
of default would result under the 6.5% Notes. Unamortized
debt issuance costs of $4,103 and $698 associated with the
6.5% Notes are included in other assets at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and are being
amortized over the seven-year period ending December 2012.
2.75% Convertible
Senior Notes
On March 12, 2004, the Company completed a primary offering
of $60,000 of 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes (the
2.75% Notes). On April 13, 2004, the
initial purchasers of the 2.75% Notes exercised their
option to purchase an additional $10,000 aggregate principal
amount of the notes. Collectively, the primary offering and
purchase option of the 2.75% Notes totaled $70,000. The
2.75% Notes are general senior unsecured obligations.
Interest is paid semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 and
payments began on September 15, 2004. The 2.75% Notes
mature on March 15, 2024 unless the notes are repurchased,
redeemed or converted earlier. The Company may redeem the
2.75% Notes for cash on or after March 15, 2011, at
100 percent of the principal amount of the notes plus
accrued interest. The holders of the 2.75% Notes have the
right to require the Company to purchase the 2.75% Notes,
including unpaid interest, on March 15, 2011, 2014, and
2019 or upon a change of control related event. On
March 15, 2011 or upon a change in control event, the
Company must pay the purchase price in cash. On March 15,
2014 and 2019, the Company has the option of providing its
common stock in lieu of cash or a combination of common stock
and cash to fund purchases. The holders of the 2.75% Notes
may, under certain circumstances, convert the notes into shares
of the Companys common stock at an initial conversion
ratio of 51.3611 shares of common stock per $1,000.00
principal amount of notes (representing a conversion price of
approximately $19.47 per share resulting in
3,595,277 shares at December 31, 2006 subject to
adjustment in certain circumstances). The notes will be
convertible only upon the occurrence of certain specified events
including, but not limited to, if, at certain times, the closing
sale price of the Companys common stock exceeds
120 percent of the then current conversion price, or $23.36
per share, based on the initial conversion price. In the event
of a default under any Company credit agreement other than the
indenture covering the 2.75% Notes, (1) in which the
Company fails to pay principal or interest on indebtedness with
an aggregate principal balance of $10,000 or more; or
(2) in which indebtedness with a principal balance of
$10,000 or more is accelerated, an event of default would result
under the 2.75% Notes.
On June 10, 2005, the Company received a letter from a law
firm representing an investor claiming to be the owner of in
excess of 25 percent of the 2.75% Notes asserting
that, as a result of the Companys failure to timely file
with the SEC its 2004
Form 10-K
and its Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, it was placing the
Company on notice of an event of default under the indenture
dated as of March 12, 2004 between the Company, as issuer,
and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as trustee (the
Indenture), which governs the 2.75% Notes. The
Company indicated that it did not believe that it had failed to
perform its obligations under the relevant provisions of the
Indenture referenced in the letter. On August 19, 2005, the
Company entered into a settlement agreement with the
F-24
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
beneficial owner of the 2.75% Notes on behalf of whom the
notice of default was sent, pursuant to which the Company agreed
to use commercially reasonable efforts to solicit the requisite
vote to approve an amendment to the Indenture (the
Indenture Amendment). The Company obtained the
requisite vote and on September 22, 2005, the Indenture
Amendment became effective.
The Indenture Amendment extended the initial date on or after
which the 2.75% Notes may be redeemed by the Company to
March 15, 2013 from March 15, 2011. In addition, a new
provision was added to the Indenture which requires the Company,
in the event of a fundamental change which is a
change of control event in which 10 percent or more of the
consideration in the transaction consists of cash to make a
coupon make-whole payment equal to the present value (discounted
at the U.S. treasury rate) of the lesser of (a) two
years of scheduled payments of interest on the 2.75% Notes
or (b) all scheduled interest on the 2.75% Notes from
the date of the transaction through March 15, 2013.
Unamortized debt issue costs of $2,175 and $2,714 associated
with the 2.75% Notes are included in other assets at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and are being
amortized over the seven-year period ending March 2011.
2004
Credit Facility
On March 12, 2004, the existing $125,000 June 2002
credit agreement was amended, restated and increased to $150,000
(the 2004 Credit Facility). Although the 2004 Credit
Facility was scheduled to mature on March 12, 2007, it was
replaced in October 2006 when the Company secured the 2006
Credit Facility (see 2006 Credit Facility above).
The 2004 Credit Facility could be used for standby and
commercial letters of credit, borrowings or a combination
thereof. Borrowings were limited to the lesser of
40 percent of the borrowing base or $30,000. Interest was
payable quarterly at a base rate plus a margin ranging from
0.75 percent to 2.00 percent or on a Eurodollar rate
plus a margin ranging from 1.75 percent to
3.00 percent. The 2004 Credit Facility was collateralized
by substantially all of the Companys assets, including
stock of the Companys principal subsidiaries, prohibited
the payment of cash dividends and required the Company to
maintain certain financial ratios. The borrowing base was
calculated using varying percentages of cash, accounts
receivable, accrued revenue, contract cost and recognized income
not yet billed, property, plant and equipment, and spare parts.
Unamortized debt issue costs of $982 associated with the 2004
Credit Facility are included in other assets at
December 31, 2005.
As of October 27, 2006 the Company terminated the 2004
Credit Facility with no borrowings outstanding and reissued the
letters of credit outstanding under the 2006 Credit Facility.
There were $54,928 of letters of credit outstanding as of
December 31, 2005.
2004
Credit Facility Waivers
In January 2005, the Company obtained a Consent and Waiver from
its syndicated bank group, covering a period through
June 29, 2005, waiving certain defaults and covenants which
related to the filing of tax returns, the payment of taxes when
due, tax liens and legal proceedings against the Company related
to a tax assessment in Bolivia. Additional Consent and Waivers
were obtained from the syndicated bank group as of April 8 and
June 13, 2005 with respect to these defaults and
non-compliance with certain financial covenants as of
June 13, 2005.
On July 19, 2005, the Company entered into a Second
Amendment and Waiver Agreement (Waiver Amendment) of
the 2004 Credit Facility with the bank group to obtain
continuing waivers regarding its non-compliance with certain
financial and non-financial covenants in the 2004 Credit
Facility. Under the terms of the Waiver Amendment, the total
credit availability under the 2004 Credit Facility was reduced
to $100,000 as of the effective date of the Waiver Amendment.
Subject to certain conditions, the bank group agreed to
permanently waive all existing and probable technical defaults
under the 2004 Credit Facility as long as the Company submitted
year-end 2004 financial statements and interim financial
statements for the quarters ended March 31 and June 30,
2005 by September 30, 2005. These
F-25
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
conditions relate primarily to submissions of various financial
statements and other financial and borrowing base related
information.
The Waiver Amendment also modified certain of the ongoing
financial covenants under the 2004 Credit Facility and
established a requirement that the Company maintain a minimum
cash balance of $15,000. Until such time as the waiver became
permanent, the Company had certain additional reporting
requirements, including periodic cash balance reporting. In
addition, the Waiver Amendment prohibited the Company from
borrowing cash under the 2004 Credit Facility until the waiver
became permanent. The Company was not able to submit the
referenced statements by September 30, 2005; therefore, the
waiver did not become permanent.
During the period from November 23, 2005 to June 14,
2006, the Company entered into four additional amendments and
waivers to the 2004 Credit Facility with its syndicated bank
group to waive non-compliance with certain financial and
non-financial covenants. Among other things, the amendments
provided that (1) certain financial covenants and reporting
obligations were waived
and/or
modified to reflect the Companys current and anticipated
future operating performance, (2) the ultimate reduction of
the facility to $70,000 for issuance of letter of credit
obligations only, and (3) a requirement for the Company to
maintain a minimum cash balance of $15,000.
On August 18, 2006 the Company entered into a Sixth
Amendment and Temporary Waiver Agreement (the Sixth
Amendment) which waived the Companys failure to
comply with certain financial covenants of the 2004 Credit
Facility during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006
until the earlier of (i) September 30, 2006 or
(ii) the occurrence of a waiver default, which
is a breach by the Company of any covenant, a material breach of
any representation and warranty or the occurrence of any default
or event of default under the 2004 Credit Facility, other than
the defaults which were temporarily waived by the Sixth
Amendment. The Sixth Amendment further amended the 2004 Credit
Facility to reduce the total commitment to $50,000 and provided
for a letter of credit limit of $50,000 less the face amount of
letters of credit issued prior to August 18, 2006, and
provided that each new letter of credit must be fully cash
collateralized and that a letter of credit fee of
0.25 percent be paid for each cash collateralized letter of
credit. The Sixth Amendment expired on September 30, 2006,
and availability under the 2004 Credit Facility was reduced to
zero. On October 27, 2006, the Company entered into a new
$100,000 synthetic credit facility and reissued under this
facility all the then outstanding letters of credit (see
2006 Credit Facility above).
Capital
leases
Assets held under capital leases are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Construction equipment
|
|
$
|
10,662
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
|
1,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets held under capital lease
|
|
|
12,643
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
Less accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(1,572
|
)
|
|
|
(312
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets under capital lease
|
|
$
|
11,071
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
The following are the minimum lease payments for assets financed
under capital lease arrangements as of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year:
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
5,480
|
|
2008
|
|
|
4,198
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3,466
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments under capital leases
|
|
|
13,144
|
|
Less: interest expense
|
|
|
(1,543
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net minimum lease payments under capital leases
|
|
|
11,601
|
|
Less: current portion of net minimum lease payments
|
|
|
(4,524
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term net minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
7,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
obligations
The Company has various notes payable, generally related to
equipment financing, and local revolving credit facilities. All
are at market interest rates, and are collateralized by certain
vehicles, equipment
and/or real
estate.
The Company has unsecured credit facilities with banks in
certain countries outside the United States. Borrowings in the
form of short-term notes and overdrafts are made at competitive
local interest rates. Generally, each line is available only for
borrowings related to operations in a specific country. Credit
available under these facilities is approximately $4,582 at
December 31, 2006. There were no outstanding borrowings
made under these facilities at December 31, 2006 or 2005.
8. RETIREMENT
BENEFITS
The Company has defined contribution plans that are funded by
participating employee contributions and the Company. The
Company matches employee contributions, up to a maximum of four
percent of salary, in the form of cash. All contributions in the
form of WGI common stock were suspended in 2005, and removed as
an option on January 9, 2006. Company contributions for the
plans were $1,761, $1,909, and $1,423 (including WGI common
stock valued at $0, $80 and $221) in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
9. INCOME
TAXES
The tax regimes of the countries in which the Company operates
affect the consolidated income tax provision of the Company and
its effective tax rate. The effective consolidated tax rate
differs from the United States (U.S.) federal
statutory rate as tax rates and methods of determining taxes
payable are different in each country. Moreover, losses from one
country generally cannot be used to offset taxable income from
another country and, in some cases, certain expenses are not
deductible for tax purposes.
F-27
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
Income (loss) before income taxes and the provision (benefit)
for income taxes in the consolidated statements of operations
consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other countries
|
|
$
|
(15,468
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27,977
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,100
|
|
United States
|
|
|
(4,259
|
)
|
|
|
(816
|
)
|
|
|
(10,831
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(19,727
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28,793
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other countries
|
|
$
|
901
|
|
|
$
|
305
|
|
|
$
|
564
|
|
United States:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
(1,214
|
)
|
|
|
(3,369
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,006
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(2,482
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax expense (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other countries
|
|
|
1,644
|
|
|
|
(1,317
|
)
|
|
|
2,087
|
|
United States
|
|
|
(1,342
|
)
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
|
(632
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
1,646
|
|
|
|
(1,455
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
$
|
2,308
|
|
|
$
|
1,668
|
|
|
$
|
(1,027
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes has been determined based upon
the tax laws and rates in the countries in which operations are
conducted and income is earned. The Company and many of its
subsidiaries are Panamanian companies. Panamanian tax law is
based on territorial principles and does not impose income tax
on income earned outside of Panama.
The Companys principal international operations are in
Oman. The Companys subsidiary in Oman is subject to a
corporate income tax rate of 12 percent.
In 2004, the Company had foreign earnings which were non-taxable
due to exemptions or tax holidays in certain countries.
Non-taxable foreign earnings for taxable year 2004 were $5,066.
The Company did not have any non-taxable foreign earnings for
taxable years 2005 and 2006.
The Companys subsidiaries operating in the United States
are subject to federal income tax rates up to 35 percent
and varying state income tax rates and methods of computing tax
liabilities. For 2006, the Companys subsidiaries operating
in Canada are subject to a federal income tax rate of
22.12 percent and a provincial income tax of
10.37 percent.
F-28
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
A reconciliation of the differences between the provision for
income tax computed at the appropriate statutory rates and the
reported provision for income taxes is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision at statutory rate (Panama)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Taxes on foreign earnings at greater than Panama rate
|
|
|
2,230
|
|
|
|
(2,063
|
)
|
|
|
4,246
|
|
Taxes on U.S. earnings at greater than Panama rate
|
|
|
(1,785
|
)
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
(3,537
|
)
|
U.S. state taxes
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
1,201
|
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
U.S. and Canadian permanent tax adjustments
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
|
|
1,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. alternative minimum tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
(1,594
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,308
|
|
|
$
|
1,668
|
|
|
$
|
(1,027
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has total net tax assets equal to $6,173. The
Company is owed tax refunds of $3,436, which have been included
in the Companys prepaid expenses. These refunds were
primarily the result of the Companys ability to carry a
significant portion of losses recognized in 2004 back to 2002 in
order to offset taxable income recognized in that year. For
2006, the Company owes various federal and state/provincial tax
authorities $1,669, and this amount is included in accrued
income taxes.
The Company has net deferred tax assets of $5,064 at
December 31, 2006. The principal components of the
Companys net deferred tax assets are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self insured medical accrual
|
|
$
|
304
|
|
|
$
|
211
|
|
Accrued vacation
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
637
|
|
Non-U.S. tax
net operating loss carry forwards
|
|
|
12,410
|
|
|
|
15,404
|
|
U.S. tax net operating loss carry forwards
|
|
|
2,570
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
Alternative minimum tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
|
|
753
|
|
Debt issue cost amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
Estimated loss
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
19,202
|
|
|
|
18,459
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(12,410
|
)
|
|
|
(14,212
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance
|
|
|
6,792
|
|
|
|
4,247
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(786
|
)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(941
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(1,728
|
)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
5,064
|
|
|
$
|
4,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-29
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
The net deferred tax assets by geographical location are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
5,144
|
|
|
$
|
2,669
|
|
Other countries
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
1,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
5,064
|
|
|
$
|
4,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets related to net
operating loss carry forwards (including state net operating
loss carry forwards) is dependent upon the generation of future
taxable income in a particular tax jurisdiction during the
periods in which the use of such net operating losses are
allowed. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred
tax liabilities and projected future taxable income in making
this assessment. In 2006, the Company utilized United States and
Canada federal net operating losses of $14,854 and utilized
state/provincial net operating losses of $4,236.
At December 31, 2006, the Company has remaining
U.S. net operating loss carry forwards of $6,741 and state
net operating loss carry forwards of $7,769. The Companys
federal net operating losses expire in 2013. A state net
operating loss generally expires after five years in which the
net operating loss was incurred. Based upon the level of
historical taxable income and projections for future taxable
income over the periods in which the net operating losses can be
utilized to offset taxable income, management believes that the
Company will realize the tax benefits of $2,564 from these loss
carry forwards.
We note that the Companys U.S. subsidiaries report
taxable income on a consolidated tax return, which includes
income from discontinued operations. The net operating losses of
the consolidated group are shared by each subsidiary in the
consolidated group, including the Willbros Mt. West subsidiary
in which a portion of its operations were discontinued. The
table of deferred tax assets set forth above for 2005 reflected
only a portion of the federal net operating loss that could have
been used by the Companys U.S. subsidiaries
continuing operations. Net operating losses in the amount of
$10,269 for 2005 were allocated to discontinued operations in
order to offset any taxable gain derived from the sale of the
Opal TXP-4 gas production facility. However, based on the
Companys tax position, the net operating losses previously
allocated to discontinued operations, were allocated instead to
continuing operations, thereby increasing the Companys net
operating loss deferred tax asset.
The Company also has net operating loss carry forwards derived
in the United Kingdom, Bolivia, and Pakistan of $43,154 as set
forth below. The tax benefit from these net operating losses has
been fully reserved and the total valuation allowance at
December 31, 2006 is $43,154. The Company also has written
off previously recorded tax assets fully reserved for because
the Company does not have work planned in those countries in the
future, there is no risk of a future taxable event,
and/or net
operating loss carry forwards have expired.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
$
|
31,783
|
|
|
(16,167 Pounds)
|
Bolivia
|
|
|
11,281
|
|
|
(93,602 Bolivianos)
|
Pakistan
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
(5,485 Rupees)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
43,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
Private sale of
equity
On October 27, 2006, the Company completed a private
placement of equity to certain accredited investors pursuant to
which the Company issued and sold 3,722,360 shares of the
Companys common stock resulting in net proceeds of
$48,748. The selling price was $14.00 per share which was a
discount
F-30
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
of approximately 10 percent based on the Companys
closing stock price of $15.50 on October 24, 2006. Net
proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes primarily
to support the start up of several new projects in the United
States and Canada. In conjunction with the private placement the
Company also issued warrants to purchase an additional
558,354 shares of the Companys common stock. Each
warrant is exercisable, in whole or in part, until
60 months from the date of issuance. A warrant holder may
elect to exercise the warrant by delivery of payment to the
Company at the exercise price of $19.03 per share, or pursuant
to a cashless exercise as provided in the warrant agreement. The
fair value of the warrants was $3,423 on the date of the grant,
as calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. At
December 31, 2006, all warrants to purchase common stock
remained outstanding.
Stockholder
rights plan
On April 1, 1999, the Company adopted a Stockholder Rights
Plan and declared a distribution of one Preferred Share Purchase
Right (Right) on each outstanding share of the
Companys common stock. The distribution was made on
April 15, 1999 to stockholders of record on that date. The
Rights expire on April 14, 2009.
The Rights are exercisable only if a person or group acquires
15 percent or more of the Companys common stock or
announces a tender offer the consummation of which would result
in ownership by a person or group of 15 percent or more of
the common stock. Each Right entitles stockholders to buy one
one-thousandth of a share of a series of junior participating
preferred stock at an exercise price of $30.00 per share.
If the Company is acquired in a merger or other business
combination transaction after a person or group has acquired
15 percent or more of the Companys outstanding common
stock, each Right entitles its holder to purchase, at the
Rights then-current exercise price, a number of acquiring
companys common shares having a market value of twice such
price. In addition, if a person or group acquires
15 percent or more of the Companys outstanding common
stock, each Right entitles its holder (other than such person or
members of such group) to purchase, at the Rights
then-current exercise price, a number of the Companys
common shares having a market value of twice such price.
Prior to the acquisition by a person or group of beneficial
ownership of 15 percent or more of the Companys
common stock, the Rights are redeemable for one-half cent per
Right at the option of the Companys Board of Directors.
Stock ownership
plans
The information contained in this note pertains to continuing
and discontinued operations.
During May 1996, the Company established the Willbros Group,
Inc. 1996 Stock Plan (the 1996 Plan) with
1,125,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance to
provide for awards to key employees of the Company, and the
Willbros Group, Inc. Director Stock Plan (the Director
Plan) with 125,000 shares of common stock authorized
for issuance to provide for the grant of stock options to
non-employee directors. The number of shares authorized for
issuance under the 1996 Plan, and the Director Plan, was
increased to 4,075,000 and 225,000, respectively, by stockholder
approval. The Director Plan expired August 14, 2006, In
2006, the Company established the 2006 Director Restricted
Stock Plan (the 2006 Director Plan) with 50,000 shares
authorized for issuance to grant shares of restricted stock to
non-employee directors.
Restricted stock and restricted stock rights, also described
collectively as restricted stock units (RSUs),
and options granted under the 1996 Plan vest generally over a
three to four year period. Options granted under the Director
Plan vest six months after the date of grant. Restricted stock
granted under the 2006 Director Plan vests one year after
the date of grant. At December 31, 2006, the
F-31
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
1996 Plan had 791,236 shares and the 2006 Director
Plan had 46,884 shares available for grant. There are an
additional 356,000 shares in the 2006 Stock Plan reserved
for future grants required under employment agreements. Certain
provisions allow for accelerated vesting based on increases of
share prices and on eligible retirement. During the year ended
December 31, 2006, $3,247 of compensation expense was
recognized due to accelerated vesting of RSUs due to
retirements and separation from the Company.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair
value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R using
the modified prospective application method. Under this method,
compensation cost recognized during the year ended
December 31, 2006 includes the applicable amounts of:
(a) compensation expense of all share-based payments
granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, January 1, 2006
(based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with
the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, and
previously presented in the pro forma footnote disclosures in
the Companys SEC reports), and (b) compensation cost
for all share-based payments granted subsequent to
January 1, 2006 (based on the grant-date fair value
estimated in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 123R). The Company uses the Black-Scholes
valuation method to determine the fair value of stock options
granted as of the grant date. Results for prior periods have not
been adjusted.
As a result of adopting SFAS No. 123R, the loss from
continuing operations before income taxes and the net loss for
the year ended December 31, 2006 both increased by $518 due
to the additional compensation expense recorded. For the year
ended December 31, 2006, basic and diluted earnings per
share were both negatively impacted by $.02 due to the
implementation of SFAS No. 123R.
Share-based compensation related to RSUs is recorded based
on the Companys stock price as of the grant date.
Recognition of share-based compensation related to RSUs
was not impacted by the adoption of SFAS No. 123R.
Expense from both stock options and RSUs totaled $7,240,
for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Company had no
tax benefits related to either stock options or RSUs
during the year ended December 31, 2006.
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for awards
granted under the stock ownership plans following the
recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles
Board Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, and related Interpretations, as permitted by
SFAS No. 123. Because it is the Companys policy
to grant stock options at the market price on the date of grant,
the intrinsic value of these grants was zero and, therefore, no
compensation expense was recorded. Under the modified
prospective application method, results for prior periods have
not been adjusted to reflect the effects of implementing
SFAS No. 123R. The following pro forma information is
presented for comparative purposes and illustrates the pro forma
effect on net loss and net loss per share as if the Company had
applied the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS No. 123 to share-based compensation prior to
January 1, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss as reported
|
|
$
|
(38,780
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,815
|
)
|
Add stock-based employee compensation included in net income
|
|
|
2,558
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
Less stock-based employee compensation determined under fair
value method
|
|
|
(3,098
|
)
|
|
|
(1,431
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss
|
|
$
|
(39,320
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,640
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic, as reported
|
|
$
|
(1.82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.99
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic, pro forma
|
|
$
|
(1.85
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted, as reported
|
|
$
|
(1.82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.99
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted, pro forma
|
|
$
|
(1.85
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
The fair value of granted options was estimated on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value
|
|
$
|
6.36
|
|
|
$
|
6.75
|
|
|
$
|
4.02
|
|
Weighted average assumptions used:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected option life in years
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.56
|
%
|
|
|
2.28
|
%
|
|
|
0.97
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
44.05
|
%
|
|
|
43.61
|
%
|
|
|
45.41
|
%
|
Volatility is calculated using an analysis of historical
volatility. The Company believes that the historical volatility
of the Companys stock is the best method for estimating
future volatility. The expected lives of options are determined
based on the Companys historical share option exercise
experience. The Company believes the historical experience
method is the best estimate of future exercise patterns
currently available. The risk-free interest rates are determined
using the implied yield currently available for zero-coupon
U.S. government issues with a remaining term equal to the
expected life of the options.
The Companys stock option activity and related information
consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
exercise
price
|
|
Shares
|
|
exercise
price
|
|
Shares
|
|
exercise
price
|
|
|
Outstanding, beginning of year
|
|
|
887,270
|
|
$
|
11.76
|
|
|
954,020
|
|
$
|
11.57
|
|
|
1,447,399
|
|
$
|
10.68
|
Granted
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
17.06
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
21.19
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
12.73
|
Exercised
|
|
|
296,520
|
|
|
11.41
|
|
|
33,750
|
|
|
10.09
|
|
|
478,879
|
|
|
8.69
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
13.68
|
|
|
63,000
|
|
|
13.47
|
|
|
59,500
|
|
|
13.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of year
|
|
|
806,750
|
|
$
|
13.46
|
|
|
887,270
|
|
$
|
11.76
|
|
|
954,020
|
|
$
|
11.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of year
|
|
|
604,250
|
|
$
|
12.20
|
|
|
864,020
|
|
$
|
11.83
|
|
|
926,520
|
|
$
|
11.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, the aggregate intrinsic value of
stock options outstanding and stock options exercisable was
$4,450 and $4,106, respectively. The weighted average remaining
contractual term of outstanding options is 6.00 years and
the weighted average remaining contractual term of the
exercisable options is 4.84 years at December 31,
2006. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $2,639,
$298 and $3,689 during the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004 respectively. There was no tax benefit realized
related to those exercises.
The total fair value of options vested during the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 was $357, $829 and
$1,059, respectively.
F-33
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
The Companys nonvested options at December 31, 2006
and the changes in nonvested options during the year ended
December 31, 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
grant-date
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
fair
value
|
|
|
Nonvested, beginning of year
|
|
|
23,250
|
|
$
|
3.79
|
Granted
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
6.36
|
Vested
|
|
|
67,000
|
|
|
5.33
|
Forfeited or expired
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
6.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, end of year
|
|
|
202,500
|
|
$
|
6.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys RSU activity and related information consist
of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
grant-date
|
|
|
|
grant-date
|
|
|
|
grant-date
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
fair
value
|
|
Shares
|
|
fair
value
|
|
Shares
|
|
fair
value
|
|
|
Outstanding, beginning of year
|
|
|
441,375
|
|
$
|
19.61
|
|
|
209,500
|
|
$
|
2.64
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
Granted
|
|
|
278,116
|
|
|
17.86
|
|
|
343,000
|
|
|
22.31
|
|
|
226,500
|
|
|
12.62
|
Vested, shares released
|
|
|
402,250
|
|
|
19.76
|
|
|
48,375
|
|
|
12.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
17,125
|
|
|
17.59
|
|
|
62,750
|
|
|
16.32
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
12.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of year
|
|
|
300,116
|
|
$
|
17.85
|
|
|
441,375
|
|
$
|
19.61
|
|
|
209,500
|
|
$
|
12.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2006 include
225,000 RSUs which are vested but have a deferred share
issuance date. The total fair value of RSUs vested during
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 was $6,990 and
$1,583 respectively.
As of December 31, 2006, there was a total of $4,151 of
unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures,
related to all non-vested share-based compensation arrangements
granted under the Companys stock ownership plans. That
cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period
of 1.64 years.
In March 2002, certain officers of the Company borrowed a total
of $1,307 under the Employee Stock Purchase Program, which
permitted selected executives and officers (exclusive of the
Chief Executive Officer) to borrow from the Company up to
100 percent of the funds required to exercise vested stock
options. The loans are full recourse, non-interest bearing for a
period of up to five years and are collateralized by the related
stock. The difference of $434 between the discounted value of
the loans and the fair market value of the stock on the date of
exercise, and $119 representing the difference between the
exercise price of certain options and the fair market value of
the stock was recorded as compensation expense at the date of
exercise. The notes were recorded at the discounted value, and
the discount was amortized as interest income over the periods
the notes were outstanding. The net loans receivable are
presented as a reduction of stockholders equity. The
maximum loan amount any one officer may have outstanding under
the Employee Stock Purchase Program is $250. In accordance with
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Company no longer makes
loans to executive officers of the Company. All loans were
settled in 2006.
F-34
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
11. INCOME
(LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share are computed as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations applicable to common
shares
|
|
$
|
(22,035
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30,461
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding for basic
income per share
|
|
|
22,440,742
|
|
|
|
21,258,211
|
|
|
|
20,922,002
|
|
Weighted average number of dilutive potential common shares
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding for diluted
income per share
|
|
|
22,440,742
|
|
|
|
21,258,211
|
|
|
|
20,922,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.98
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.98
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company incurred net losses for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005 and has therefore excluded the
securities listed below from the computation of diluted income
(loss) per share as the effect would be anti-dilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
2.75% Convertible Senior Notes
|
|
|
3,595,277
|
|
|
|
3,595,277
|
|
|
|
3,595,277
|
|
6.5% Senior Convertible Notes
|
|
|
4,813,171
|
|
|
|
3,702,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
806,750
|
|
|
|
887,270
|
|
|
|
954,020
|
|
Warrants to purchase common stock
|
|
|
558,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
274,241
|
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
|
166,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,047,793
|
|
|
|
8,459,986
|
|
|
|
4,715,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
Issue 04-8,
The Effect of Contingently Convertible Instruments on
Diluted Earnings per Share, the 8,408,448 shares
issuable upon conversion of the convertible notes will be
included in diluted income (loss) per share if those securities
are dilutive, regardless of whether the market trigger prices of
$19.47 and $17.56, respectively, have been met.
The Companys segments are strategic business units that
are managed separately as each has different operational
requirements and strategies. Beginning the first quarter of
2007, the Company defines its operating segments based on the
Companys core lines of business rather than geographic
markets as presented in prior periods. The Companys
operating segments are defined as the following reportable
segments: Construction, Engineering, and
Engineering, Procurement and Construction
(EPC). The three reportable segments
operate primarily in the United States, Canada, and the Middle
East. Previously, the Companys reportable segments were
US & Canada and International. Prior
period balances have been reclassified to reflect this change.
Management evaluates the performance of each operating segment
based on operating margin. The Companys corporate
operations include the general, administrative, and financing
functions of the organization. The costs of these functions are
allocated
F-35
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
between the three operating segments. There are no material
inter-segment revenues in the periods presented.
The tables below reflect the Companys business segments as
of and for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Engineering
|
|
EPC*
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
421,270
|
|
|
$
|
75,833
|
|
$
|
46,156
|
|
|
$
|
543,259
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
386,189
|
|
|
|
61,985
|
|
|
41,320
|
|
|
|
489,494
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
8,935
|
|
|
|
827
|
|
|
2,668
|
|
|
|
12,430
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
41,397
|
|
|
|
8,612
|
|
|
3,357
|
|
|
|
53,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
436,521
|
|
|
|
71,424
|
|
|
47,345
|
|
|
|
555,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
$
|
(15,251
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,409
|
|
$
|
(1,189
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,031
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Engineering
|
|
|
EPC*
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
214,020
|
|
|
$
|
43,194
|
|
|
$
|
37,265
|
|
$
|
294,479
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
199,151
|
|
|
|
39,592
|
|
|
|
27,329
|
|
|
266,072
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
8,389
|
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
2,234
|
|
|
11,688
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
32,959
|
|
|
|
6,123
|
|
|
|
3,268
|
|
|
42,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,499
|
|
|
|
46,780
|
|
|
|
32,831
|
|
|
320,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
$
|
(26,479
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,586
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,434
|
|
$
|
(25,631
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
Engineering
|
|
|
EPC*
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
226,662
|
|
$
|
30,993
|
|
|
$
|
15,139
|
|
|
$
|
272,794
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
179,624
|
|
|
30,079
|
|
|
|
12,654
|
|
|
|
222,357
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7,541
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
1,357
|
|
|
|
9,776
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
27,175
|
|
|
3,980
|
|
|
|
1,370
|
|
|
|
32,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214,340
|
|
|
34,937
|
|
|
|
15,381
|
|
|
|
264,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
$
|
12,322
|
|
$
|
(3,944
|
)
|
|
$
|
(242
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures by segment are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
9,396
|
|
|
$
|
16,096
|
|
|
$
|
6,057
|
|
Engineering
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
EPC
|
|
|
989
|
|
|
|
3,673
|
|
|
|
941
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
1,832
|
|
|
|
5,342
|
|
|
|
8,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
12,264
|
|
|
$
|
25,111
|
|
|
$
|
15,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-36
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
Total assets by segment are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
196,166
|
|
|
$
|
99,985
|
|
Engineering
|
|
|
15,346
|
|
|
|
11,270
|
|
EPC
|
|
|
15,170
|
|
|
|
14,448
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
67,380
|
|
|
|
112,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets, continuing operations
|
|
$
|
294,062
|
|
|
$
|
237,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to a limited number of major projects and clients, the
Company may at any one time have a substantial part of its
operations dedicated to one project, client and country.
Customers representing more than 10 percent of total
contract revenue are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Customer A
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Customer B
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Customer D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information about the Companys operations in its work
countries is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
312,121
|
|
|
$
|
214,252
|
|
|
$
|
138,054
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
161,924
|
|
|
|
54,754
|
|
|
|
33,524
|
|
Oman
|
|
|
69,214
|
|
|
|
25,294
|
|
|
|
36,846
|
|
Ecuador
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
3,222
|
|
Iraq
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,029
|
|
Bolivia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,368
|
|
Cameroon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
543,259
|
|
|
$
|
294,479
|
|
|
$
|
272,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
33,115
|
|
|
$
|
29,956
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
21,666
|
|
|
|
20,567
|
|
Oman
|
|
|
7,858
|
|
|
|
4,040
|
|
Bolivia
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,157
|
|
|
|
4,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
65,347
|
|
|
$
|
59,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-37
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
|
|
13.
|
CONTINGENCIES,
COMMITMENTS AND OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES
|
On January 6, 2005, J. Kenneth Tillery, then President of
Willbros International, Inc. (WII), who was
principally responsible for international operations, including
Bolivian operations, resigned from the Company. Following
Mr. Tillerys resignation, the Audit Committee,
working with independent outside legal counsel and forensic
accountants retained by such legal counsel, commenced an
independent investigation into the circumstances surrounding the
Bolivian tax assessment and the actions of Mr. Tillery in
other international locations. The Audit Committees
investigation identified payments that were made by or at the
direction of Mr. Tillery in Bolivia, Nigeria and Ecuador,
which may have been in violation of the United States Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and other United States
laws. The investigation also revealed that Mr. Tillery
authorized numerous transactions between Company subsidiaries
and entities in which he apparently held an ownership interest
or exercised significant control (See Note 16Related
Party Transactions below). In addition, the Company has learned
that certain acts carried out by Mr. Tillery and others
acting under his direction with respect to a bid for work in
Sudan may constitute facilitation efforts prohibited by
U.S. law, a violation of U.S. trade sanctions and the
unauthorized export of technical information.
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) is currently conducting an investigation into
whether the Company and others may have violated various
provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities
Act) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act). The United States Department of
Justice (DOJ) is investigating violations of the
FCPA and other applicable laws. In addition, the United States
Department of Treasurys Office of Foreign Assets Control
(OFAC) is commencing an investigation of the
potentially improper facilitation and export activities.
The Company is cooperating fully with each of these
investigations. If the Company or one of its subsidiaries is
found to have violated the FCPA, that entity could be subject to
civil penalties of up to $650 per violation and criminal
penalties of up to the greater of $2,000 per violation or twice
the gross pecuniary gain resulting from the improper conduct. If
the Company or one of its subsidiaries is found to have violated
trade sanctions or U.S. export restrictions, that entity
could be subject to civil penalties of up to $11 per violation
and criminal penalties of up to $250 per violation. There may be
other penalties that could apply under other U.S. laws or
the laws of foreign jurisdictions. While the consequences of
these investigations on the Company and its subsidiaries are
uncertain, the possible consequences includebut are not
limited todebarment from participating in future
U.S. government contracts and from participating in certain
U.S. export transactions default of existing credit
facilities, restricted access to capital markets and insurance
and harm to existing and future commercial relationships. The
Company cannot predict the outcome of the investigations being
conducted by the SEC, the DOJ and OFAC, including the
Companys exposure to civil or criminal fines or penalties,
or other regulatory action which could have a material adverse
effect on the Companys business, financial condition and
results of operations. In addition, the Companys ability
to obtain and retain business and to collect outstanding
receivables in current or future operating locations could be
negatively affected.
On May 18, 2005 a securities
class-action
lawsuit, captioned Legion Partners, LLP v. Willbros
Group, Inc. et al., was filed in the United States District
Court for the Southern District of Texas against the Company and
certain of its present and former officers and directors.
Thereafter, three nearly identical lawsuits were filed.
Plaintiffs purport to represent a class composed of all persons
who purchased or otherwise acquired Willbros Group, Inc. common
stock and/or
other securities between May 6, 2002 and May 16, 2005,
inclusive. The complaint seeks unspecified monetary damages and
other relief. WGI filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on
March 9, 2006, and briefing on that motion was completed on
June 14, 2006. While the motion to dismiss was pending, WGI
reached a settlement in principle with the Lead Plaintiff and
the parties signed a Memorandum of Understanding
(Settlement). The Settlement provides for a payment
of $10,500 to resolve all claims against all defendants. On
February 15, 2007, the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of Texas issued an Order approving the
Settlement. The Order dismissed with prejudice all claims
against all defendants. No members of the
F-38
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
settlement class exercised their right to be excluded from or
object to the final settlement, which was funded by the
Companys insurance carrier. The Courts Order ends
the class action litigation.
Operations outside the United States may be subject to certain
risks which ordinarily would not be expected to exist in the
United States, including foreign currency restrictions, extreme
exchange rate fluctuations, expropriation of assets, civil
uprisings and riots, war, unanticipated taxes including income
taxes, excise duties, import taxes, export taxes, sales taxes or
other governmental assessments, availability of suitable
personnel and equipment, termination of existing contracts and
leases, government instability and legal systems of decrees,
laws, regulations, interpretations and court decisions which are
not always fully developed and which may be retroactively
applied. Management is not presently aware of any events of the
type described in the countries in which it operates that have
not been provided for in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
Based upon the advice of local advisors in the various work
countries concerning the interpretation of the laws, practices
and customs of the countries in which it operates, management
believes the Company follows the current practices in those
countries; however, because of the nature of these potential
risks, there can be no assurance that the Company may not be
adversely affected by them in the future. The Company insures
substantially all of its equipment in countries outside the
United States against certain political risks and terrorism
through political risk insurance coverage that contains a
20 percent co-insurance provision.
The Company has the usual liability of contractors for the
completion of contracts and the warranty of its work. Where work
is performed through a joint venture, the Company also has
possible liability for the contract completion and warranty
responsibilities of its joint venture partners. In addition, the
Company acts as prime contractor on a majority of the projects
it undertakes and is normally responsible for the performance of
the entire project, including subcontract work. Management is
not aware of any material exposure related thereto which has not
been provided for in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, other assets and accounts
receivable of the Discontinued Operations include anticipated
recoveries from insurance or third parties of $1,191 and $4,656,
respectively, primarily related to the repair of pipelines. The
Company believes the recovery of these costs from insurance or
other parties is probable. Actual recoveries may vary from these
estimates.
Certain post-contract completion audits and reviews are
periodically conducted by clients
and/or
government entities. While there can be no assurance that claims
will not be received as a result of such audits and reviews,
management does not believe a legitimate basis exists for any
material claims. At the present time it is not possible for
management to estimate the likelihood of such claims being
asserted or, if asserted, the amount or nature thereof.
From time to time, the Company enters into commercial
commitments, usually in the form of commercial and standby
letters of credit, insurance bonds and financial guarantees.
Contracts with the Companys customers may require the
Company to provide letters of credit or insurance bonds with
regard to the Companys performance of contracted services.
In such cases, the commitments can be called upon in the event
of failure to perform contracted services. Likewise, contracts
may allow the Company to issue letters of credit or insurance
bonds in lieu of contract retention provisions, in which the
client withholds a percentage of the contract value until
project completion or expiration of a warranty period. Retention
commitments can be called upon in the event of warranty or
project completion issues, as prescribed in the contracts. At
December 31, 2006, the Company had approximately $41,920 of
letters of credit related to continuing operations and $22,625
of letters of credit related to Discontinued Operations in
Nigeria. Additionally, the Company had $99,050 of insurance
bonds outstanding related to continuing operations. These
amounts represent the maximum amount of future payments the
Company could be required to make. The Company had no liability
recorded as of December 31, 2006, related to these
commitments.
F-39
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
In connection with the private placement of the 6.5% Notes
on December 23, 2005, the Company entered into a
Registration Rights Agreement with the Purchasers. The
Registration Rights Agreement requires the Company to file a
registration statement with respect to the resale of the shares
of the Companys common stock issuable upon conversion of
the 6.5% Notes no later than June 30, 2006 and to use
its best efforts to cause such registration statement to be
declared effective no later than December 31, 2006. The
Company is also required to keep the registration statement
effective after December 31, 2006. In the event the Company
is unable to satisfy its obligations under the Registration
Rights Agreement, the Company will owe additional interest to
the holders of the 6.5% Notes at a rate per annum equal to
0.5 percent of the principal amount of the 6.5% Notes
for the first 90 days and 1.0 percent per annum from
and after the 91st day following such event. The Company filed
the registration statement on June 30, 2006 and it was
declared effective on January 18, 2007 by the SEC. As such,
the Company will pay an additional $22 of penalty interest to
the holders of the 6.5% Notes, as a result of the
registration statement having been declared effective after
December 31, 2006.
In connection with the private placement of common stock and
warrants on October 27, 2006, the Company entered into a
Registration Rights Agreement with the buyers (the 2006
Registration Rights Agreement). The 2006 Registration
Rights Agreement requires the Company to file a registration
statement with respect to the resale of the common stock,
including the common stock underlying the warrants, no later
than 60 days after the closing of the private placement,
and to use its reasonable best efforts to cause the registration
statement to be declared effective no later than 120 days
after the closing of the private placement. In the event of a
delay in the filing or effectiveness of the registration
statement, or for any period during which the effectiveness of
the registration statement is not maintained or is suspended by
the Company other than as permitted under the 2006 Registration
Rights Agreement, the Company will be required to pay each buyer
an amount in cash equal to 1.25 percent of such
buyers aggregate purchase price of its common stock and
warrants, but the Company shall not be required to pay any buyer
an aggregate amount that exceeds 10 percent of such
buyers aggregate purchase price.
In addition to the matters discussed above, the Company is a
party to a number of other legal proceedings. Management
believes that the nature and number of these proceedings are
typical for a firm of similar size engaged in a similar type of
business and that none of these proceedings is material to the
Companys financial position.
The Company has certain operating leases for office and camp
facilities. Rental expense for continuing operations, excluding
daily rentals and reimbursable rentals under cost plus
contracts, was $2,079 in 2006, $2,216 in 2005, and $2,938 in
2004. Minimum lease commitments under operating leases as of
December 31, 2006, totaled $17,650 and are payable as
follows: 2007, $7,755; 2008, $5,270; 2009, $2,701; 2010, $1,062;
2011, $862 and thereafter, $0.
The Company has a 50 percent interest in a pipeline
construction joint venture for the Chad-Cameroon Pipeline
Project in Africa. This project was completed in 2003, and the
Company adjusted its investment in the joint venture to zero.
Since 2004, activity for the 50 percent owned joint venture
was limited to warranty work, which was accrued in prior years.
The summarized balance sheet information at December 31,
2006 and 2005 reflects this decreased level of activity.
F-40
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
351
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
351
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. QUARTERLY
FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
Selected unaudited quarterly financial data for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005 is presented below. The total of
the quarterly income (loss) per share amounts may not equal the
per share amounts for the full year due to the manner in which
earnings (loss) per share is calculated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year 2006 quarter
ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Total
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
107,586
|
|
|
$
|
119,128
|
|
|
$
|
125,466
|
|
|
$
|
191,079
|
|
|
$
|
543,259
|
|
Contract margin
|
|
|
6,126
|
|
|
|
13,381
|
|
|
|
12,048
|
|
|
|
22,210
|
|
|
|
53,765
|
|
Pre-tax loss
|
|
|
(8,796
|
)
|
|
|
(3,418
|
)
|
|
|
(4,586
|
)
|
|
|
(2,927
|
)
|
|
|
(19,727
|
)
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(8,541
|
)
|
|
|
(5,104
|
)
|
|
|
(4,965
|
)
|
|
|
(3,425
|
)
|
|
|
(22,035
|
)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
3,948
|
|
|
|
(33,048
|
)
|
|
|
(17,136
|
)
|
|
|
(37,166
|
)
|
|
|
(83,402
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(4,593
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38,152
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,101
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40,591
|
)
|
|
$
|
(105,437
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.98
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
(1.53
|
)
|
|
|
(0.80
|
)
|
|
|
(1.47
|
)
|
|
|
(3.72
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.77
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.61
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.70
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.98
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
(1.53
|
)
|
|
|
(0.80
|
)
|
|
|
(1.47
|
)
|
|
|
(3.72
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.77
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.61
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.70
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-41
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year 2005 quarter
ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Total
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
43,443
|
|
|
$
|
68,050
|
|
|
$
|
65,034
|
|
|
$
|
117,952
|
|
|
$
|
294,479
|
|
Contract margin
|
|
|
1,752
|
|
|
|
7,798
|
|
|
|
5,604
|
|
|
|
13,253
|
|
|
|
28,407
|
|
Pre-tax loss
|
|
|
(10,594
|
)
|
|
|
(5,165
|
)
|
|
|
(10,044
|
)
|
|
|
(2,990
|
)
|
|
|
(28,793
|
)
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(8,732
|
)
|
|
|
(6,153
|
)
|
|
|
(8,950
|
)
|
|
|
(6,626
|
)
|
|
|
(30,461
|
)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(1,166
|
)
|
|
|
(3,766
|
)
|
|
|
(8,603
|
)
|
|
|
5,216
|
|
|
|
(8,319
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(9,898
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,919
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,553
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,410
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38,780
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.43
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(0.47
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.47
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.83
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.82
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.43
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(0.47
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.47
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.83
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.82
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Notes:
|
|
Ø
|
The decision to sell the business operations and assets in
Nigeria and Venezuela, and the TXP-4 Plant in Opal, Wyoming, in
2006 resulted in their reclassification to discontinued
operations in all periods presented.
|
|
Ø
|
The quarters ended 2005 and March 31, 2006 were restated to
reflect this reclassification in
Form 8-K
filed on December 8, 2006. See
Note 2Discontinuance of Operations and Asset Disposal
of the consolidated financial statements for further discussion
of discontinued operations.
|
|
Ø
|
The income from discontinued operations in the quarter ended
March 31, 2006 includes a gain on sale of the TXP-4 Plant
in Opal, Wyoming, of $1,342 net of tax.
|
|
Ø
|
On November 28, 2006, the Company completed the sale of its
operations and assets in Venezuela, recognizing no gain.
|
|
Ø
|
In the fourth quarter of 2006 the Company recognized a loss
provision on a Nigeria project of $26,657, which contributed to
the 2006 loss from Discontinued Operations.
|
The Company derives its revenue from contracts with durations
from a few weeks to several months or in some cases, more than a
year. Unit-price contracts provide relatively even quarterly
results. However, major projects are usually fixed-price
contracts that may result in uneven quarterly financial results
due to the method by which revenue is recognized.
|
|
15.
|
PARENT,
GUARANTOR, NON-GUARANTOR CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
Set forth below are the condensed, consolidating financial
statements of (a) WGI, (b) WUSAI, which is a guarantor
of the 6.5% Notes and (c) all other direct and
indirect subsidiaries which are not guarantors of the
6.5% Notes. There are currently no restrictions on the
ability of WUSAI to transfer funds to WGI in the form of cash
dividends or advances. Under the terms of the Indenture for the
6.5% Notes, WUSAI may not sell or otherwise dispose of all
or substantially all of its assets to, or merge with or into
another entity, other than the Company, unless no default exists
under the Indenture
F-42
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
and the acquirer assumes all of the obligations of WUSAI under
the Indenture. WGI is a holding company with no significant
operations, other than through its subsidiaries.
The condensed, consolidating financial statements are presented
as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006. The
condensed, consolidating financial statements present
investments in consolidated subsidiaries using the equity method
of accounting.
F-43
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
Condensed
consolidating balance sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
(Guarantor)
|
|
|
guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
24,776
|
|
|
$
|
4,895
|
|
|
$
|
7,972
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,643
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
81,004
|
|
|
|
56,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,104
|
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,225
|
|
|
|
8,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,027
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
16,092
|
|
|
|
1,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,299
|
|
Parts and supplies inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,069
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,192
|
|
Receivables from affiliated companies
|
|
|
280,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(280,853
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
305,664
|
|
|
|
104,776
|
|
|
|
369,747
|
|
|
|
(280,853
|
)
|
|
|
499,334
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,144
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,064
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,115
|
|
|
|
32,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,347
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
(42,228
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
6,344
|
|
|
|
5,007
|
|
|
|
7,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
269,780
|
|
|
$
|
148,042
|
|
|
$
|
409,057
|
|
|
$
|
(238,625
|
)
|
|
$
|
588,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and current portion of long- term debt
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,382
|
|
|
$
|
1,180
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,562
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
17,349
|
|
|
|
63,120
|
|
|
|
41,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,352
|
|
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,779
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,947
|
|
Accrued income tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,657
|
|
|
|
1,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,556
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,980
|
|
|
|
(171,888
|
)
|
|
|
182,092
|
|
Payables to affiliated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,923
|
|
|
|
86,042
|
|
|
|
(108,965
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
17,349
|
|
|
|
106,861
|
|
|
|
485,152
|
|
|
|
(280,853
|
)
|
|
|
328,509
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
154,500
|
|
|
|
7,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,577
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
171,849
|
|
|
|
113,938
|
|
|
|
485,389
|
|
|
|
(280,853
|
)
|
|
|
490,323
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
217,036
|
|
|
|
89,156
|
|
|
|
8,526
|
|
|
|
(97,682
|
)
|
|
|
217,036
|
|
Retained earnings (deficit)
|
|
|
(120,603
|
)
|
|
|
(55,060
|
)
|
|
|
(84,177
|
)
|
|
|
139,237
|
|
|
|
(120,603
|
)
|
Other stockholders equity components
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(713
|
)
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
97,931
|
|
|
|
34,104
|
|
|
|
(76,332
|
)
|
|
|
42,228
|
|
|
|
97,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
269,780
|
|
|
$
|
148,042
|
|
|
$
|
409,057
|
|
|
$
|
(238,625
|
)
|
|
$
|
588,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
(Guarantor)
|
|
|
guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
58,794
|
|
|
$
|
(5,240
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,379
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
55,933
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
61,807
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,003
|
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,839
|
|
|
|
1,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,619
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,300
|
|
|
|
1,571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,871
|
|
Parts and supplies inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,509
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,049
|
|
|
|
238,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261,099
|
|
Receivables from affiliated companies
|
|
|
173,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(173,080
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
232,070
|
|
|
|
96,456
|
|
|
|
267,588
|
|
|
|
(173,080
|
)
|
|
|
423,034
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,669
|
|
|
|
1,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,134
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,956
|
|
|
|
29,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,706
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
46,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,158
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,412
|
|
|
|
3,301
|
|
|
|
5,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
281,640
|
|
|
$
|
132,382
|
|
|
$
|
304,101
|
|
|
$
|
(219,238
|
)
|
|
$
|
498,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,671
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,680
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
|
45,631
|
|
|
|
20,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,599
|
|
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,342
|
|
Accrued income tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,308
|
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,368
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
|
156,876
|
|
|
|
(13,671
|
)
|
|
|
144,085
|
|
Payables to affiliated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,183
|
|
|
|
115,226
|
|
|
|
(159,409
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
|
95,796
|
|
|
|
293,952
|
|
|
|
(173,080
|
)
|
|
|
218,074
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,340
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
136,406
|
|
|
|
96,130
|
|
|
|
294,195
|
|
|
|
(173,080
|
)
|
|
|
353,651
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
161,596
|
|
|
|
89,156
|
|
|
|
8,526
|
|
|
|
(97,682
|
)
|
|
|
161,596
|
|
Retained earnings (deficit)
|
|
|
(15,166
|
)
|
|
|
(52,912
|
)
|
|
|
1,585
|
|
|
|
51,327
|
|
|
|
(15,166
|
)
|
Other stockholders equity components
|
|
|
(2,278
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
(2,278
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
145,234
|
|
|
|
36,252
|
|
|
|
9,906
|
|
|
|
(46,158
|
)
|
|
|
145,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
281,640
|
|
|
$
|
132,382
|
|
|
$
|
304,101
|
|
|
$
|
(219,238
|
)
|
|
$
|
498,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the
current classification of costs between the Guarantor and the
Non-guarantor. |
F-45
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
Condensed
consolidating statements of operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
(Guarantor)
|
|
|
guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
338,459
|
|
|
$
|
226,095
|
|
|
$
|
(21,295
|
)
|
|
$
|
543,259
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,290
|
|
|
|
199,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
489,494
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,490
|
|
|
|
3,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,430
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
10,617
|
|
|
|
43,462
|
|
|
|
20,582
|
|
|
|
(21,995
|
)
|
|
|
53,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(10,617
|
)
|
|
|
(3,783
|
)
|
|
|
2,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,031
|
)
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in loss of consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(87,910
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interestnet
|
|
|
(6,909
|
)
|
|
|
(865
|
)
|
|
|
(491
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,265
|
)
|
Othernet
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(105,437
|
)
|
|
|
(4,259
|
)
|
|
|
2,059
|
|
|
|
87,910
|
|
|
|
(19,727
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
2,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(105,437
|
)
|
|
|
(4,023
|
)
|
|
|
(485
|
)
|
|
|
87,910
|
|
|
|
(22,035
|
)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations net of provision for
income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
|
(85,277
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83,402
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(105,437
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,148
|
)
|
|
$
|
(85,762
|
)
|
|
$
|
87,910
|
|
|
$
|
(105,437
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
(Guarantor)
|
|
|
guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
230,464
|
|
|
$
|
80,225
|
|
|
$
|
(16,210
|
)
|
|
$
|
294,479
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract costs
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
192,194
|
|
|
|
73,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,072
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,242
|
|
|
|
4,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,688
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
6,035
|
|
|
|
30,055
|
|
|
|
22,470
|
|
|
|
(16,210
|
)
|
|
|
42,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(6,037
|
)
|
|
|
973
|
|
|
|
(20,567
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,631
|
)
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in loss of consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(31,096
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interestnet
|
|
|
(1,861
|
)
|
|
|
(1,151
|
)
|
|
|
(892
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,904
|
)
|
Othernet
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(39,235
|
)
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
(20,969
|
)
|
|
|
31,096
|
|
|
|
(28,793
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
|
|
3,134
|
|
|
|
(1,011
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(38,780
|
)
|
|
|
(2,819
|
)
|
|
|
(19,958
|
)
|
|
|
31,096
|
|
|
|
(30,461
|
)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations net of provision for
income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,613
|
|
|
|
(10,932
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,319
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(38,780
|
)
|
|
$
|
(206
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30,890
|
)
|
|
$
|
31,096
|
|
|
$
|
(38,780
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-46
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
(Guarantor)
|
|
|
guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
144,931
|
|
|
$
|
134,739
|
|
|
$
|
(6,876
|
)
|
|
$
|
272,794
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract costs
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
125,364
|
|
|
|
96,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222,357
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,188
|
|
|
|
4,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,776
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
4,271
|
|
|
|
24,678
|
|
|
|
10,452
|
|
|
|
(6,876
|
)
|
|
|
32,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(4,268
|
)
|
|
|
(10,299
|
)
|
|
|
22,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,136
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in loss of consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(14,571
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,571
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interestnet
|
|
|
(1,521
|
)
|
|
|
(423
|
)
|
|
|
(536
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,480
|
)
|
Othernet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(387
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(20,360
|
)
|
|
|
(10,896
|
)
|
|
|
21,954
|
|
|
|
14,571
|
|
|
|
5,269
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
(4,012
|
)
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,027
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(20,815
|
)
|
|
|
(6,884
|
)
|
|
|
19,424
|
|
|
|
14,571
|
|
|
|
6,296
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations net of provision for
income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,144
|
|
|
|
(30,255
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,111
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(20,815
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,740
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,831
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,571
|
|
|
$
|
(20,815
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
consolidating statements of cash flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
(Guarantor)
|
|
|
guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
totals
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities of
continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(9,563
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,252
|
|
|
$
|
(17,118
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
(5,429
|
)
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities of
discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
|
(98,918
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97,923
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(9,563
|
)
|
|
|
22,247
|
|
|
|
(116,036
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103,352
|
)
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,131
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,663
|
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
16,532
|
|
|
|
25,082
|
|
|
|
6,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,514
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,926
|
)
|
|
|
(7,447
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,373
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing
operations
|
|
|
16,532
|
|
|
|
24,287
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,804
|
|
Net cash flows used in investing activities of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,431
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,431
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
16,532
|
|
|
|
24,287
|
|
|
|
(7,446
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,373
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-47
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
(Guarantor)
|
|
|
guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
totals
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
52,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,130
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of 6.5% Notes
|
|
|
19,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,500
|
|
Advances from (repayments to) parent/affiliates
|
|
|
(107,773
|
)
|
|
|
(21,425
|
)
|
|
|
129,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of bank and other debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,135
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,135
|
)
|
Payment of capital lease
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(683
|
)
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(891
|
)
|
Costs of debt issuance and other
|
|
|
(4,844
|
)
|
|
|
(2,156
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,054
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing
operations
|
|
|
(40,987
|
)
|
|
|
(36,399
|
)
|
|
|
128,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,550
|
|
Net cash flows provided by financing activities of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(40,987
|
)
|
|
|
(36,399
|
)
|
|
|
128,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,550
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) all activities
|
|
$
|
(34,018
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,135
|
|
|
$
|
5,593
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
(18,290
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-48
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
(Guarantor)
|
|
|
Non-guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
totals
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used in operating activities of continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
(4,445
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,601
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,585
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
(34,631
|
)
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities of
discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,693
|
|
|
|
(6,179
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,486
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(4,445
|
)
|
|
|
(8,908
|
)
|
|
|
(23,764
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,117
|
)
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,740
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(576
|
)
|
|
|
(18,130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,706
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(576
|
)
|
|
|
(16,390
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,966
|
)
|
Net cash flows used in investing activities of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,690
|
)
|
|
|
(17,308
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,998
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,266
|
)
|
|
|
(33,698
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,964
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of 6.5% Notes
|
|
|
65,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,000
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of bank and other debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
(447
|
)
|
|
|
4,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,924
|
|
Advances from (repayments to) parent/affiliates
|
|
|
(57,124
|
)
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
57,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of bank and other debt
|
|
|
(15,000
|
)
|
|
|
(4,400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,400
|
)
|
Payment of capital lease
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,405
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,405
|
)
|
Costs of debt issuance and other
|
|
|
(791
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(498
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,289
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing
operations
|
|
|
7,085
|
|
|
|
(5,029
|
)
|
|
|
54,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,830
|
|
Net cash flows provided by financing activities of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
7,085
|
|
|
|
(5,029
|
)
|
|
|
54,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,830
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) all activities
|
|
$
|
2,640
|
|
|
$
|
(17,203
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,671
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
(17,234
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-49
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Consolidating
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
(Guarantor)
|
|
|
subsidiaries
|
|
|
entries
|
|
totals
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities of
continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(4,728
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,691
|
)
|
|
$
|
45,095
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
38,676
|
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities of
discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,845
|
|
|
|
(5,111
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,266
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(4,728
|
)
|
|
|
2,154
|
|
|
|
39,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,410
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
678
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,274
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,653
|
)
|
|
|
(5,080
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,733
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,975
|
)
|
|
|
(4,484
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,459
|
)
|
Net cash flow used in investing activities of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,713
|
)
|
|
|
(17,579
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,292
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,688
|
)
|
|
|
(22,063
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,751
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of 2.75% Notes
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of bank and other debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,490
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
4,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,381
|
|
Advances from (repayments to) parent/affiliates
|
|
|
(2,600
|
)
|
|
|
20,153
|
|
|
|
(17,553
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of bank and other debt
|
|
|
(14,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,323
|
)
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,323
|
)
|
Costs of debt issuance and other
|
|
|
(2,311
|
)
|
|
|
(1,434
|
)
|
|
|
(1,441
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,186
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing
operations
|
|
|
55,470
|
|
|
|
17,931
|
|
|
|
(19,039
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,362
|
|
Net cash flows provided by financing activities of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
55,470
|
|
|
|
17,931
|
|
|
|
(19,039
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,362
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(829
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(829
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) all activities
|
|
$
|
50,742
|
|
|
$
|
5,397
|
|
|
$
|
(1,947
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
54,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-50
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
|
|
16.
|
RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
|
In the past, certain of the Companys subsidiaries entered
into commercial agreements with companies in which the former
President of Willbros International, Inc., J. Kenneth Tillery,
apparently had an ownership interest. Those companies included
Arbastro Trading Ltd., Hydrodive International, Ltd., Hydrodive
Offshore Services International, Inc., Hydrodive Nigeria, Ltd.,
Oco Industrial Services, Ltd., and Windfall Energy Services,
Ltd. All are companies that chartered or sold marine vessels to
the Companys subsidiaries. Hydrodive Offshore Services
International, Inc. and Hydrodive International, Ltd. have also
provided diving services to the Companys subsidiaries.
Payment terms for these vendors ranged from due on receipt to
net 30 days. The settlement method was cash.
Mr. Tillery also appears to have exercised significant
influence over the activities of Symoil Petroleum, Ltd., and
Fusion Petroleum Services, Ltd., which provided consulting
services for projects in Nigeria, and Kaplan and Associates,
which provided consulting services for projects in Bolivia and
certain other foreign locations.
Mr. Tillery resigned his position with the Company on
January 6, 2005 and accordingly none of the companies
identified above are considered related parties subsequent to
that date. Additionally, the Company has significantly
discontinued engaging services from these companies in which
Mr. Tillery had an ownership interest or exerted
significant influence. During the period since the departure of
Mr. Tillery, the Company has had continued services
provided by Windfall Energy Services and Hydrodive
International, Ltd. However, in the fourth quarter of 2005, the
Company settled all outstanding claims with these companies and
entered into new contracts governing the services to be provided
by these vendors. Under these new contracts the Company made
payments of $1,671 during the year ended December 31, 2006
related to Nigeria projects that are included in the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations of the Discontinued
Operations in Note 2Discontinuance of Operations and
Asset Disposal. Outstanding amounts owed to formerly related
parties included in current liabilities of the
Discontinued Operations equal $1,800.
Payments made to companies where Mr. Tillery appears to
have an undisclosed ownership interest, or over which he appears
to have exercised significant influence in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2006, totaling $16,629 were recorded as
contract cost or other operating expenses on Nigeria and Bolivia
projects. Included in this amount, is $16,105 related to Nigeria
projects and is included in the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations of the Discontinued Operations in
Note 2Discontinuance of Operations and Asset
Disposal. The remaining $524 related to Bolivia is included in
the Consolidated Statements of Operations. These amounts are
detailed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fusion Petroleum Services Ltd.
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
871
|
|
|
$
|
871
|
|
Hydrodive International, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,599
|
|
|
|
5,705
|
|
|
|
11,304
|
|
Hydrodive Nigeria, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
Kaplan and Associates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
Oco Industrial Services Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
Windfall Energy Services Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,519
|
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
2,441
|
|
Symoil Petroleum Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,213
|
|
|
$
|
9,416
|
|
|
$
|
16,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-51
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
Outstanding amounts owed to related parties in which
Mr. Tillery appears to have had an undisclosed ownership
interest or over which he appears to have exercised significant
influence and which are included in accounts payable and accrued
liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Oco Industrial Services Ltd.
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
Hydrodive Nigeria, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On February 7, 2007, the Company announced that it had
completed the sale of its Nigeria assets and operations to Ascot
Offshore Nigeria Limited (Ascot), a Nigerian energy
services company for total consideration of $155,250. The sale
was pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement by and between the
Company and Ascot dated as of February 7, 2007 (the
Agreement), providing for the purchase by Ascot of
all of the share capital of WG Nigeria Holdings Limited
(WGNHL) the holding company for Willbros West
Africa, Inc., Willbros (Nigeria) Limited, Willbros (Offshore)
Nigeria Limited and WG Nigeria Equipment Limited.
Under the terms of the Agreement, Ascot paid the purchase price
in the form of $150,000 in cash, plus an interest-bearing
promissory note in the principal amount of $5,250 (the
Ascot Note). The Note is secured by the guarantee of
Ascots parent company, Berkeley Group plc
(Berkeley), a company organized under the laws of
the Federal Republic of Nigeria, along with a pledge of the
Share Capital to the Company pursuant to a collateral pledge and
security agreement. On February 12, 2007 the Company
received $2,625 as payment on the Ascot Note which has a
remaining balance of $2,625 which is due and payable no later
than August 1, 2007. On March 1, 2007 the collateral
pledge and security agreement expired. The final net proceeds to
the Company are subject to certain post-closing working capital
adjustments and claims as provided by the Agreement. Under the
Agreement, the Companys obligation for any claims by
Ascot, that were not previously disclosed to Ascot, are limited
to 10 percent of the purchase price and such claim must be
made within one year from the date of the Agreement except for
any claim that may arise in the United States that is related to
SEC, DOJ and OFAC investigations described in
Note 13Contingencies, Commitments and Other
Circumstances.
Due to the many variables affecting the Companys contracts
and commercial negotiations in Nigeria, the final adjustments
may not be determined for several months, and those adjustments
may be substantial, but are not expected to result in the
recognition of a loss on this sale. In conjunction with this
transaction, the Company bought out certain minority interests
at a total cost of $10,500.
On the same date, and pursuant to the Agreement, the Company and
Ascot entered into an intellectual property license agreement
which allows Ascot to use the Willbros brand and trademark in
Nigeria for a specified period of time.
Additionally, on the same date, the Company and Willbros
International Services (Nigeria) Limited, subsidiary of the
Company (WISNL), entered into a transition services
agreement with Ascot (the TSA). Pursuant to the TSA,
WISNL agreed to provide, and WISNL and the Company will cause
other subsidiaries of the Company to provide, certain support
services to Ascot for up to two years. The TSA may be
immediately terminated at the election of the Company or WISNL
under certain circumstances.
On the same date and in connection with the sale of the shares,
the Company and its subsidiary WII entered into an Indemnity
Agreement with Ascot and Berkeley (the Indemnity
Agreement), pursuant to which Ascot and Berkeley will
indemnify the Company and WII for any obligations incurred by
the Company or WII in connection with the parent company
performance guarantees (the Guarantees)
F-52
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
that the Company and WII previously issued and maintained on
behalf of certain subsidiaries of WGNHL under certain working
contracts between the subsidiaries and their customers. The
Company is contractually obligated under the Guarantees to
perform or cause to be performed work related to several ongoing
projects in Nigeria. Among the Guarantees covered by the
Indemnity Agreement are included five contracts under which we
estimate that, at December 31, 2006, there was aggregate
remaining contract revenue, excluding any additional claim
revenue, of $374,761, and aggregate cost to complete of
$315,951. At December 31, 2006, only one of the contracts
covered by the Guarantees was estimated to be in a loss position
with an accrual for such loss in the amount of $33,157 reflected
on the balance sheet of the Nigeria portion of Discontinued
Operations included in Note 2Discontinuance of
Operations and Asset Disposal.
Pursuant to the Agreement, Intercontinental Bank Plc issued five
irrevocable unconditional backstop standby letters of credit
totaling approximately $22,625 to provide indemnification to the
Company and its affiliates relative to the performance of
certain subsidiaries of WGNHL under certain contracts which are
backed by performance letters of credit currently issued by, or
on behalf of the Company or any of its affiliates for the
benefit of WGNHL
and/or any
of its subsidiaries which will remain in effect. On
February 28, 2007, one of the letters of credit in the
amount of $2,303 expired. The remaining letters of credit are
scheduled to expire in the amount of $440 on December 19,
2007, $123 on February 28, 2008 and $19,759 on
August 31, 2008.
F-53
Willbros Group,
Inc.
Condensed
consolidated balance sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
58,709
|
|
|
$
|
37,643
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for bad debts of $789 and
$598
|
|
|
181,733
|
|
|
|
137,104
|
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed
|
|
|
29,029
|
|
|
|
11,027
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
16,322
|
|
|
|
17,299
|
|
Parts and supplies inventories
|
|
|
2,773
|
|
|
|
2,069
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
4,658
|
|
|
|
294,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
293,224
|
|
|
|
499,334
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
7,978
|
|
|
|
6,792
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
and amortization of $89,028 and $78,941
|
|
|
120,393
|
|
|
|
65,347
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
13,184
|
|
|
|
6,683
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
9,075
|
|
|
|
11,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
443,854
|
|
|
$
|
589,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
11,237
|
|
|
$
|
5,562
|
|
Current portion of government obligations
|
|
|
8,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
134,425
|
|
|
|
122,352
|
|
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income
|
|
|
7,891
|
|
|
|
14,947
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
4,671
|
|
|
|
3,556
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
4,639
|
|
|
|
182,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
170,938
|
|
|
|
328,509
|
|
2.75% convertible senior notes
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
6.5% senior convertible notes
|
|
|
32,050
|
|
|
|
84,500
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
26,085
|
|
|
|
7,077
|
|
Long-term portion of government obligations
|
|
|
24,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liability for unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
|
6,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
7,369
|
|
|
|
1,728
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
337,396
|
|
|
|
492,051
|
|
Contingencies and commitments (Note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A preferred stock, par value $.01 per share,
1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.05 per share, 70,000,000 shares
authorized; 29,337,338 shares issued (25,848,596 at
December 31, 2006)
|
|
|
1,467
|
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
273,840
|
|
|
|
217,036
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(181,912
|
)
|
|
|
(120,603
|
)
|
Treasury stock at cost, 205,507 shares (167,844 at
December 31, 2006)
|
|
|
(2,667
|
)
|
|
|
(2,154
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
15,730
|
|
|
|
2,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
106,458
|
|
|
|
97,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
443,854
|
|
|
$
|
589,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-54
Willbros Group,
Inc.
Condensed
consolidated statements of operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
246,716
|
|
|
$
|
125,466
|
|
|
$
|
610,168
|
|
|
$
|
352,181
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
207,089
|
|
|
|
113,418
|
|
|
|
538,790
|
|
|
|
320,628
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,457
|
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
13,223
|
|
|
|
9,180
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
17,448
|
|
|
|
11,092
|
|
|
|
42,295
|
|
|
|
33,133
|
|
Government fines
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,994
|
|
|
|
127,775
|
|
|
|
616,308
|
|
|
|
362,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
18,722
|
|
|
|
(2,309
|
)
|
|
|
(6,140
|
)
|
|
|
(10,760
|
)
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
4,433
|
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2,071
|
)
|
|
|
(3,046
|
)
|
|
|
(6,552
|
)
|
|
|
(7,482
|
)
|
Othernet
|
|
|
(1,327
|
)
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
(2,019
|
)
|
|
|
105
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,369
|
)
|
|
|
(2,277
|
)
|
|
|
(19,513
|
)
|
|
|
(6,027
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
16,353
|
|
|
|
(4,586
|
)
|
|
|
(25,653
|
)
|
|
|
(16,787
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
6,081
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
7,793
|
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
10,272
|
|
|
|
(4,965
|
)
|
|
|
(33,446
|
)
|
|
|
(18,598
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations net of provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
(9,126
|
)
|
|
|
(17,136
|
)
|
|
|
(21,494
|
)
|
|
|
(46,249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,146
|
|
|
$
|
(22,101
|
)
|
|
$
|
(54,940
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64,847
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.87
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
|
(0.80
|
)
|
|
|
(0.78
|
)
|
|
|
(2.15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(1.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.87
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
(0.80
|
)
|
|
|
(0.78
|
)
|
|
|
(2.15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
(1.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
28,804,907
|
|
|
|
21,557,695
|
|
|
|
27,421,927
|
|
|
|
21,480,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
34,844,482
|
|
|
|
21,557,695
|
|
|
|
27,421,927
|
|
|
|
21,480,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 8Income (Loss) Per Share for a
reconciliation of the numerator for the diluted income per share
calculation. |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-55
Willbros Group,
Inc.
Condensed
consolidated statement of stockholders equity
and
comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common
stock
|
|
excess of
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Par
value
|
|
par
value
|
|
|
deficit
|
|
|
stock
|
|
|
income
|
|
|
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2007
|
|
|
25,848,596
|
|
$
|
1,292
|
|
$
|
217,036
|
|
|
$
|
(120,603
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,154
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,360
|
|
|
$
|
97,931
|
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2007, as adjusted
|
|
|
25,848,596
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
|
217,036
|
|
|
|
(126,972
|
)
|
|
|
(2,154
|
)
|
|
|
2,360
|
|
|
|
91,562
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,940
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,940
|
)
|
Realization of loss on sale of Nigeria assets and operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,773
|
(1)
|
|
|
3,773
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,597
|
|
|
|
9,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,570
|
)
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,010
|
|
Restricted stock grants
|
|
|
384,077
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting of restricted stock rights
|
|
|
9,583
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to treasury stock, vesting restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(513
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(513
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
107,500
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
1,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
Stock issued on conversion of 6.5% senior convertible notes
|
|
|
2,987,582
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
52,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,450
|
|
Additional costs of private placement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2007
|
|
|
29,337,338
|
|
$
|
1,467
|
|
$
|
273,840
|
|
|
$
|
(181,912
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,667
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,730
|
|
|
$
|
106,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Removal of previously recorded foreign currency translation
adjustments associated with the Companys Nigeria
operations. |
|
(2) |
|
Private placement completed October 26, 2006. |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-56
Willbros Group,
Inc.
Condensed
consolidated statements of cash flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months
|
|
|
|
ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(54,940
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64,847
|
)
|
Reconciliation of net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government fines
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
21,494
|
|
|
|
46,249
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
13,223
|
|
|
|
9,180
|
|
Amortization of debt issue costs
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
|
|
1,911
|
|
Amortization of deferred compensation
|
|
|
3,010
|
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
Amortization of discount on notes receivable for stock purchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
15,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sales of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(716
|
)
|
|
|
(4,563
|
)
|
Provision for bad debts
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
Deferred income tax provision
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Equity in joint ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(753
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
(36,923
|
)
|
|
|
(17,630
|
)
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed
|
|
|
(15,226
|
)
|
|
|
(7,344
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
11,239
|
|
|
|
5,055
|
|
Parts and supplies inventories
|
|
|
(704
|
)
|
|
|
224
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(879
|
)
|
|
|
(1,503
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
3,466
|
|
|
|
13,830
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
(1,446
|
)
|
Long-term liability for unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income
|
|
|
(6,772
|
)
|
|
|
5,604
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in operating activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(22,629
|
)
|
|
|
(12,717
|
)
|
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
2,980
|
|
|
|
(59,585
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(19,649
|
)
|
|
|
(72,302
|
)
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of discontinued operations, net
|
|
|
105,568
|
|
|
|
32,082
|
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
1,428
|
|
|
|
8,243
|
|
Increase in restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,500
|
)
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(15,890
|
)
|
|
|
(12,389
|
)
|
Acquisition of subsidiary
|
|
|
(24,154
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by investing activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
66,952
|
|
|
|
26,436
|
|
Cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,191
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by investing activities
|
|
|
66,952
|
|
|
|
24,245
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of 6.5% senior convertible notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,500
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(12,993
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net
|
|
|
1,519
|
|
|
|
2,226
|
|
Repayment of notes payable
|
|
|
(8,665
|
)
|
|
|
(9,385
|
)
|
Costs of debt issues
|
|
|
(286
|
)
|
|
|
(3,776
|
)
|
Acquisition of treasury stock
|
|
|
(513
|
)
|
|
|
(554
|
)
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
Payments on capital leases
|
|
|
(7,507
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-57
Willbros Group,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months
|
|
|
|
ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
(28,445
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,841
|
|
Cash provided by financing activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(28,445
|
)
|
|
|
7,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,208
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) all activities
|
|
|
21,066
|
|
|
|
(40,457
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
37,643
|
|
|
|
55,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
58,709
|
|
|
$
|
15,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest (including discontinued operations)
|
|
$
|
5,659
|
|
|
$
|
4,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes (including discontinued operations)
|
|
$
|
8,438
|
|
|
$
|
10,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental non-cash investing and financing transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid insurance obtained by note payable (including
discontinued operations)
|
|
$
|
10,051
|
|
|
$
|
9,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and property obtained by capital leases
|
|
$
|
29,780
|
|
|
$
|
11,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement of officer note receivable for stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred government obligation payments (including discontinued
operations)
|
|
$
|
32,300
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-58
Notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements
(In thousands,
except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Willbros Group, Inc., a Republic of Panama corporation, and all
of its majority-owned subsidiaries (the Company or
WGI) provide construction; engineering; and
engineering, procurement and construction (EPC)
services to the energy industry and government entities. The
Companys principal markets for continuing operations are
the United States, Canada, and Oman. The Company obtains its
work through competitive bidding and through negotiations with
prospective clients. Contract values may range from several
thousand dollars to several hundred million dollars and contract
durations range from a few weeks to more than two years.
The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
December 31, 2006, which has been derived from audited
consolidated financial statements, and the preceding unaudited
interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of
September 30, 2007, have been prepared pursuant to the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). Accordingly, certain information and note
disclosures normally included in annual financial statements
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those
rules and regulations. However, the Company believes the
presentations and disclosures herein are adequate to make the
information not misleading. These unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction
with the Companys December 31, 2006 audited
Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto contained in
the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
In the opinion of management, the unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all adjustments (which
include normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present
fairly the financial position as of September 30, 2007, the
results of operations and cash flows of the Company for all
interim periods presented, and stockholders equity for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007. The results of
operations and cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the
operating results and cash flows to be achieved for the full
year.
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include certain
estimates and assumptions by management. These estimates and
assumptions relate to the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the date of the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense
during the periods. Significant items subject to such estimates
and assumptions include the carrying amount of property, plant
and equipment, goodwill and parts and supplies inventories;
quantification of amounts recorded for contingencies, tax
accruals and certain other accrued liabilities; valuation
allowances for accounts receivable and deferred income tax
assets; and revenue recognition under the
percentage-of-completion method of accounting including
estimates of progress toward completion and estimates of gross
profit or loss accrual on contracts in progress. The Company
bases its estimates on historical experience and other
assumptions that it believes relevant under the circumstances.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
As discussed in Note 4Discontinuance of Operations,
Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement, the Company
sold its
TXP-4 Plant
on January 12, 2006, its Venezuelan operations and assets
on August 17 and November 28, 2006, and its assets and
operations in Nigeria on February 7, 2007. Accordingly,
these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect these
operations as discontinued operations in all periods presented.
The disclosures in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements relate to continuing operations except as
otherwise indicated.
F-59
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to be
consistent with current presentation.
Cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2006 and
September 30, 2007 includes $10,000 of cash required as a
minimum balance as stipulated by the Companys 2006 Credit
Facility. See Note 7Long-term Debt.
Inventories, consisting of parts and supplies, are stated at the
lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the
first-in,
first-out
(FIFO) method. Parts and supplies inventories are
evaluated at least annually and adjusted for excess quantities
and obsolete items.
|
|
2.
|
NEW ACCOUNTING
PRONOUNCEMENTS
|
SFAS No. 157
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157
clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the
assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset
or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that
prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions.
SFAS No. 157 is effective for the Companys
fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008. The Company is
currently evaluating what impact, if any, this statement will
have on its consolidated financial statements.
SFAS No. 159
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159
permits entities to choose to measure many financial assets and
financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses
on items for which the fair value option has been elected are
reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company
is currently evaluating what impact, if any, this statement will
have on its consolidated financial statements.
FIN 48
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan
Interpretation of FASB Statement 109
(FIN 48). The Company adopted FIN 48 on
January 1, 2007. FIN 48 establishes a single model to
address accounting for uncertain tax positions. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a
minimum recognition threshold that a tax position is required to
meet before being recognized in the financial statements.
FIN 48 also provides guidance on deregulation, measurement
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure, and transition.
The Company, or one of its subsidiaries, files income tax
returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various state
and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is
no longer subject to U.S. income tax examination by tax
authorities for years before 2003 and no longer subject to
Canadian income tax for years before 2001 or in Oman for years
before 2005.
As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company
recognized a $6,369 increase in the liability for unrecognized
tax benefits, which was accounted for as an increase to the
January 1, 2007 accumulated deficit. During the third
quarter of 2007, the Company received new documentation and
support regarding existing uncertain tax positions and adjusted
the FIN 48 liability accordingly. Management has identified
additional uncertain tax positions based on information not
previously
F-60
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
available. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount
of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of adopting FIN 48 at January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
6,369
|
|
Income tax liabilities recognized prior to adoption of
FIN 48
|
|
|
158
|
|
Change in measurement of existing tax positions
|
|
|
(1,931
|
)
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
|
|
|
110
|
|
Newly identified tax positions
|
|
|
1,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
6,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to
unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. The Company has
recognized interest and penalties in its cumulative adjustment
to the beginning accumulated deficit in the amount of $568.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the
Company has recognized $18 in interest expense. Interest expense
was significantly reduced during the third quarter of 2007 as a
result of the change in measurement of existing tax positions
primarily related to prior years and previously recognized in
retained earnings upon the adoption of FIN 48. Interest and
penalties are included in the table above.
Effective July 1, 2007, the Company acquired the assets and
operations of Midwest Management (1987) Ltd.
(Midwest) pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement.
Midwest provides pipeline construction, rehabilitation and
maintenance, water crossing installations or replacements, and
facilities fabrication to the oil and gas industry,
predominantly in western Canada.
The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 141, Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141). The excess of the purchase
price over assets acquired and liabilities assumed was allocated
to goodwill, which is not deductible for income tax purposes. A
summary of the initial purchase price allocation as of
September 30, 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
7,610
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
18,258
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
5,734
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(3,692
|
)
|
Deferred income tax liability
|
|
|
(3,756
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
24,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total purchase price amount was $24,154, consisting of
$22,793 in purchase price and approximately $1,361 in
transaction costs. The final purchase price is subject to the
finalization of a working capital adjustment.
|
|
4.
|
DISCONTINUANCE OF
OPERATIONS, ASSET DISPOSALS, AND TRANSITION SERVICES
AGREEMENT
|
Strategic
Decisions
In 2006, the Company announced that it intended to sell the
TXP-4 Plant, and its assets and operations in Venezuela and
Nigeria, which led to their classification as discontinued
operations (Discontinued Operations). The net assets
and net liabilities related to the Discontinued Operations are
shown on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as
Assets of discontinued operations and
Liabilities of discontinued operations,
respectively. The results of the Discontinued Operations are
shown on the
F-61
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as Loss
from discontinued operations, net of provision for income
taxes for all periods presented.
Nigeria Assets
and Nigeria Based Operations
Share
Purchase Agreement
On February 7, 2007, the Company sold its Nigeria assets
and Nigeria based operations in West Africa to Ascot Offshore
Nigeria Limited (Ascot), a Nigerian oilfield
services company, for total consideration of $155,250 (the
Purchase Price). The sale was pursuant to a Share
Purchase Agreement by and between the Company and Ascot dated as
of February 7, 2007 (the Agreement), providing
for the purchase by Ascot of all of the share capital of WG
Nigeria Holdings Limited (WGNHL), the holding
company for Willbros West Africa, Inc., Willbros (Nigeria)
Limited, Willbros (Offshore) Nigeria Limited and WG Nigeria
Equipment Limited.
In connection with the sale of its Nigeria assets and
operations, the Company and its subsidiary Willbros
International, Inc. (WII) entered into an indemnity
agreement with Ascot and Berkeley Group plc
(Berkeley) (the Indemnity Agreement),
pursuant to which Ascot and Berkeley will indemnify the Company
and WII for any obligations incurred by the Company or WII in
connection with the parent company performance guarantees (the
Guarantees) that the Company and WII previously
issued and maintained on behalf of certain former subsidiaries
now owned by Ascot under certain working contracts between the
subsidiaries and their customers. Either the Company, WII or
both are contractually obligated, in varying degrees, under the
Guarantees to perform or cause to be performed work related to
several ongoing projects. Among the Guarantees covered by the
Indemnity Agreement are five contracts under which the Company
estimates that, at February 7, 2007, there was aggregate
remaining contract revenue, excluding any additional claim
revenue, of $352,107 and aggregate estimated cost to complete of
$293,562. At the February 7, 2007 sale date, one of the
contracts covered by the Guarantees was estimated to be in a
loss position with an accrual for such loss of $33,157. The
associated liability was included in the liabilities acquired by
Ascot. No claims have been made against the Guarantees.
Global
Settlement Agreement (GSA)
On September 7, 2007, the Company finalized the GSA with
Ascot. The significant components of the agreement include:
|
|
Ø
|
A reduction to the purchase price of $25,000;
|
|
Ø
|
Ascot agreed to provide supplemental backstop letters of credit
in the amount of $20,322 issued by a non-Nigerian bank approved
by the Company;
|
|
Ø
|
Ascot provided specific indemnities related to two ongoing
projects that Ascot acquired as part of the Agreement;
|
|
Ø
|
Ascot and the Company agreed that all working capital
adjustments as provided for in the Agreement were
resolved; and
|
|
Ø
|
Except as provided in the GSA, Ascot and the Company waived all
of their respective rights and obligations relating to
indemnifications provided in the February 7,
2007 Share Purchase Agreement concerning any breach of a
covenant or any representation or warranty.
|
As a result of the GSA, the Company has recognized a cumulative
gain on the sale of its Nigeria assets and operations of $183.
The GSA was settled by a payment to Ascot from the Company in
the amount of $11,076. This amount represents the agreed upon
reduction to the purchase price, due to Ascot, of $25,000,
reduced by amounts owed by Ascot to the Company of $11,299 for
services rendered under the Transition Services Agreement
(TSA) and $2,625 due from Ascot in the form of a
note from the closing of the Agreement. Because of the GSA,
Ascots account with the Company was current as of
September 30, 2007.
F-62
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
Letters
of Credit
At September 30, 2007, the Company had four letters of
credit outstanding totaling $20,322 associated with Discontinued
Operations (the Discontinued LCs). At the time
of the February 7, 2007, sale of the Nigeria assets and
operations, in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 45,
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for
Guarantees, Including Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others
(FIN 45), a liability was recognized for $1,575
related to the letters of credit. This liability will be
released as each of the Discontinued LCs are released or expire
and the Company is relieved of its risk related to the
Discontinued LCs. The Discontinued LCs are scheduled
to expire in the amount of $440 on December 19, 2007,
$19,759 on August 31, 2008, and $123 on February 28,
2009.
In accordance with the Agreement, the Discontinued LCs are
backstopped by U.S. dollar denominated letters of credit
issued by Intercontinental Bank Plc, a Nigerian bank.
Additionally, in accordance with the GSA, the Discontinued
LCs are supplementally backstopped by letters of credit
issued by an international bank based in Paris, France, with a
Standard and Poors rating of AA+/Stable as of
October 25, 2007. These backstop letters of credit provide
loss security to the Company in the event any of the
Companys outstanding Discontinued LCs are called.
Transition
Services Agreement
Concurrent with the Nigeria sale, the Company entered into a
two-year TSA with Ascot. Under the agreement, the Company is
primarily providing labor in the form of seconded employees to
work under the direction of Ascot along with specifically
defined work orders for services generally covered in the TSA.
Ascot has agreed to reimburse the Company for these services.
Through September 30, 2007, these reimbursable contract
costs totaled approximately $21,582. The after-tax residual net
loss from providing these transition services is $370, or less
than 2% of the incurred costs for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. Both the Company and Ascot are working
to shift the transition services provided by the Company to
direct services secured by Ascot.
Although the services provided under the TSA generate
transactions between the Company and Ascot, the amounts are not
considered to be significant. Additionally, the Companys
level of support has decreased over the term of the TSA to date,
as the employees and services provided by the Company shift to
direct employees and services secured by Ascot. The Company does
not have the ability to significantly influence the operating or
financial policies of Ascot. Under the provisions of Emerging
Issues Task Force Issue
03-13,
Applying the Conditions of Paragraph 42 of FASB
Statement No. 144 in Determining Whether to Report
Discontinued Operations
(EITF 03-13),
the Company has no significant continuing involvement in the
operations of the former assets and operations owned in Nigeria.
Accordingly, income generated by the TSA is shown, net of costs
incurred, as a component of Loss from discontinued
operations, net of provision for income taxes on the
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations, and its assets
and liabilities are shown as Assets of discontinued
operations and Liabilities of discontinued
operations, respectively, in the Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
Residual
Equipment in Nigeria
In conjunction with the TSA, the Company has made available
certain equipment to Ascot for use in Nigeria; this equipment
was not sold to Ascot under the Agreement. Through
September 30, 2007, the Company has not resolved the rental
rates for this equipment with Ascot for the period
February 8, 2007 through September 30, 2007. As agreed
in the GSA, on September 14, 2007, the Company received an
appraisal for this equipment; the fair-value of the equipment
was $8,477. The Companys net book value for this equipment
at September 30, 2007 was $2,377. This equipment is
comprised of construction equipment, rolling stock, and
generator sets. The Company and Ascot are working to resolve the
issue of rental equipment, either through cash settlement or
though an exchange of equipment.
F-63
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
Venezuela
Business
Disposal
On November 28, 2006, the Company completed the sale of its
assets and operations in Venezuela. The Company received total
compensation of $7,000 in cash and $3,300 in the form of a
commitment from the buyer, to be paid on or before
December 4, 2013. The repayment commitment is secured by a
10% interest in a Venezuelan financing joint venture. As of
September 30, 2007, no payment on the commitment has been
made. The Company estimates no gain or loss on the sale of its
assets and operations in Venezuela.
TXP-4
Plant
Asset
Disposal
On January 12, 2006, the Company completed the sale of its
TXP-4 Plant. The Company received cash payments of $27,944 for
the sale and realized a gain of $1,342, net of taxes of $691.
In addition to the cash payments described above, Williams Field
Services Company (Williams) agreed to pay the
Company a portion of any recovery that Williams may obtain based
on damages, loss or injury related to the TXP-4 Plant up to
$3,400. This settlement is contingent upon Williams
recovery from various third parties and is the only ongoing
potential source of cash flows subsequent to the sale date. The
timing and amount of any resolution to these claims cannot be
estimated. No additional payments have been received.
F-64
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
Results of
Discontinued Operations
Condensed Statements of Operations of the Discontinued
Operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
Nigeria
TSA
|
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
Opal
TXP-4
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,825
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
4,825
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,690
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
Profit disgorgement
|
|
|
10,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,300
|
|
|
|
4,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(10,300
|
)
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,467
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(8,859
|
)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,972
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(8,859
|
)
|
|
$
|
(267
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
(9,126
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
Nigeria
TSA
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
|
Opal
TXP-4
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
102,304
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
102,347
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
112,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,546
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
7,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(17,312
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,429
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
3,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(13,834
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,952
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
3,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(17,018
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
(118
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
(17,136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-65
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
Nigeria
TSA
|
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
Opal
TXP-4
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
30,046
|
|
|
$
|
21,906
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
51,952
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
34,360
|
|
|
|
20,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,887
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,472
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,037
|
|
Profit disgorgement
|
|
|
10,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,132
|
|
|
|
21,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(18,086
|
)
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,762
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(1,946
|
)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,891
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(20,032
|
)
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,653
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(21,124
|
)
|
|
$
|
(370
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
(21,494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
Nigeria
TSA
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
|
Opal
TXP-4
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
375,275
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
375,532
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
372,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373,049
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,985
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
20,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(21,158
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,005
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,163
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(11,022
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
2,033
|
|
|
(8,825
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(32,180
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(841
|
)
|
|
|
2,033
|
|
|
(30,988
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
14,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
15,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(46,607
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
(984
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,342
|
|
$
|
(46,249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-66
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
Financial
Position of Discontinued Operations
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Discontinued
Operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
Nigeria
TSA
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
Opal
TXP-4
|
|
operations
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
130
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,602
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,797
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,228
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,658
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets of discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
Nigeria
TSA
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
Opal
TXP-4
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
12,964
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
12,964
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
36,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,683
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
76,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,673
|
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed
|
|
|
79,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,364
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
16,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,017
|
|
Parts and supplies inventories
|
|
|
21,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
243,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,346
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
50,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,723
|
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
294,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,192
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
148,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,135
|
|
Loss provision on contracts
|
|
|
33,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
182,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets of discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
112,100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
112,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-67
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
Profit
Disgorgement
Subsequent to September 30, 2007, the Company reached an
agreement in principle with the staff of the SEC to resolve the
investigation of possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act and the U.S. securities laws related to
projects in Bolivia, Ecuador and Nigeria. As a result of this
agreement in principle, subject to approval by the SEC
commissioners, the Company has recorded a $10,300 charge to
discontinued operations. The $10,300 is profit disgorgement,
inclusive of accrued interest on the disgorged profit, related
to a single Nigeria project included in the February 7,
2007 sale of the Companys Nigeria assets and operations.
The disgorged profit was previously recognized in the results
from discontinued operations, and accordingly, the full amount
of $10,300 is recorded as a charge to discontinued operations in
the third quarter of 2007. This classification is consistent
with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
(SFAS No. 144). See
Note 13 Contingencies, Commitments and Other
Circumstances for further discussion of the agreement in
principle.
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
Nigeria had restricted cash of $36,683 on December 31,
2006. The December 31, 2006 balance was in a consortium
bank account that required the approval of the Company and its
consortium partner to disburse funds. Additionally, cash and
cash equivalents for Nigeria contained $9,482 at
December 31, 2006, that was appropriated for use by
specific projects.
Parts and
Supplies Inventories
Nigeria had parts and supplies inventories of $21,645, net of
reserves of $12,159, at December 31, 2006.
Loss
Provision on Contracts
The Company had recognized $33,957 of estimated losses related
to two projects in Nigeria as of December 31, 2006.
Contingencies,
Commitments and Other Circumstances
At December 31, 2006, other assets and accounts receivable
of the Discontinued Operations include anticipated recoveries
from insurance or third parties of $1,191, primarily related to
the repair of pipelines.
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed on
uncompleted contracts arise when revenues have been recorded,
but the amounts cannot be billed under the terms of the
contracts. Such amounts are recoverable from customers upon
various measures of performance, including achievement of
certain milestones, completion of specified units or completion
of the contract. Also included in contract cost and recognized
income not yet billed on uncompleted contracts are amounts the
Company seeks to collect from customers for change orders
approved in scope, but not for price associated with that scope
change (unapproved change orders). Revenue for these amounts are
recorded equal to cost incurred when realization of price
approval is probable and the estimated amount is equal to or
greater than the Companys cost related to the unapproved
change order. Unapproved change orders involve the use of
estimates, and it is reasonably possible that revisions to the
estimated recoverable amounts of recorded unapproved change
orders may be made in the near-term. If the Company does not
successfully resolve these matters, a net expense (recorded as a
reduction in revenues), may be required, in addition to amounts
that have been previously recorded.
F-68
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed, and contract
billings in excess of cost and recognized income, as of
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed
|
|
$
|
29,029
|
|
|
$
|
11,027
|
|
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income
|
|
|
(7,891
|
)
|
|
|
(14,947
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,138
|
|
|
$
|
(3,920
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed includes
$3,245 and $1,191 at September 30, 2007, and
December 31, 2006, respectively, on completed contracts.
Included in the $3,245 unbilled at September 30, 2007, is a
$1,736 change order related to one project that has been
invoiced and collected subsequent to quarter end.
|
|
6.
|
GOVERNMENT
OBLIGATIONS
|
Government obligations represent amounts to become due to
government entities, specifically the Department of Justice
(DOJ) and the SEC, as final settlement of the
investigations involving possible violations of the Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act (the FCPA) and possible
violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. These investigations stem primarily from
the Companys former operations in Bolivia, Ecuador and
Nigeria. In October 2007, the Company reached agreements in
principle, subject to approval by the DOJ and the SEC, to settle
their investigations. The agreements in principle provide for an
anticipated aggregate payment of $32,300 consisting of $22,000
in fines payable to the DOJ related to FCPA violations and
$10,300 of profit disgorgement payable to the SEC.
As a result of the agreements in principle, the Company has
increased its accrual related to these investigations by $8,300.
This increase is recorded in the third quarter of 2007 and is
comprised of: 1) a $2,000 reduction in the Companys
second quarter of 2007 estimate of $24,000 in fines resulting
from the DOJ actions that was recorded as a charge to continuing
operations, and 2) an additional $10,300 of profit
disgorgement, inclusive of accrued interest on the disgorged
profit, resulting from SEC actions. The profit disgorgement is
related to a single Nigeria project included in the
February 7, 2007 sale of the Companys Nigeria assets
and operations. The disgorged profit was previously recognized
in the results from discontinued operations, and accordingly,
the full amount of $10,300 is recorded as a charge to
discontinued operations in the third quarter of 2007.
The aggregate obligation of $32,300 has been classified on the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as $8,075 in Current
portion of government obligations and the remaining
$24,225 in Long-term portion of government
obligations. This division is based on payment terms in
the agreements in principle that provide for four equal
installments, first on signing of the final settlements and
annually for approximately three years thereafter.
The agreements in principle are contingent upon the
parties agreement to the terms of a final settlement
agreement, and approval by the DOJ and SEC and confirmation by a
federal district court. There can be no assurance that the
settlement will be finalized. See Note 13
Contingencies, Commitments and Other Circumstances for further
discussion of the agreements in principle.
F-69
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
Long-term debt as of September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
2.75% convertible senior notes
|
|
$
|
70,000
|
|
|
$
|
70,000
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
34,797
|
|
|
|
11,601
|
|
6.5% senior convertible notes
|
|
|
32,050
|
|
|
|
84,500
|
|
Other obligations
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
2006 Credit Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
136,960
|
|
|
|
166,152
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(8,825
|
)
|
|
|
(4,575
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
128,135
|
|
|
$
|
161,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Credit
Facility
On October 27, 2006, Willbros USA, Inc., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company, entered into a new $100,000
three-year senior secured synthetic credit facility (the
2006 Credit Facility) with a group of lenders led by
Calyon New York Branch (Calyon). The 2006 Credit
Facility replaced the Companys 2004 Credit Facility. The
Company may elect to increase the total capacity under the 2006
Credit Facility to $150,000, with Calyons consent. Through
December 31, 2007, the Company has received a commitment
from Calyon to increase the capacity under the 2006 Credit
Facility to $125,000 subject to certain terms and conditions.
The 2006 Credit Facility may be used for standby and commercial
letters of credit, borrowings or a combination thereof.
Borrowings, which may be made up to $25,000 less the amount of
any letter of credit advances or financial letters of credit,
must be repaid at least once a year and no new revolving
advances may be made for a period of 10 consecutive
business days thereafter.
Fees payable under the 2006 Credit Facility include a facility
fee at a rate per annum equal to 5.0 percent of the 2006
Credit Facility capacity, payable quarterly in arrears (the
facility fee will be reduced to 2.75 percent if the Company
obtains a rating from S&P and Moodys greater than B
and B2, respectively), and a letter of credit fee equal to
0.125 percent per annum of aggregate commitments. Interest
on any borrowings is payable quarterly in arrears at the
adjusted base rate minus 1.00 percent or at a Eurodollar
rate at the Companys option. The 2006 Credit Facility is
collateralized by substantially all of the Companys
assets, including stock of the Companys principal
subsidiaries. The Company may not make any acquisitions
involving cash consideration in excess of $5,000 in any
12-month
period, and $10,000 in the aggregate, without the approval of a
majority of the lenders under the 2006 Credit Facility. The 2006
Credit Facility contains a requirement for the maintenance of a
$10,000 minimum cash balance, prohibits the payment of cash
dividends and includes customary affirmative and negative
covenants, such as limitations on the creation of certain new
indebtedness and liens, restrictions on certain transactions and
payments, maintenance of a maximum senior leverage ratio, a
minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, and minimum tangible net
worth requirement. A default may be triggered by events such as
a failure to comply with financial covenants or other covenants,
a failure to make payments when due, a failure to make payments
when due in respect of or a failure to perform obligations
relating to debt obligations in excess of $5,000, a change of
control of the Company or certain insolvency proceedings as
defined by the 2006 Credit Facility. The 2006 Credit Facility is
guaranteed by the Company and certain other subsidiaries.
Unamortized costs associated with the creation of the 2006
Credit Facility total $1,463 and $1,986 and are included in
other assets at September 30, 2007 and December 31,
2006, respectively. Because the 2006 Credit Facility has only
F-70
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
been used to provide letters of credit, these costs are being
amortized to general and administrative expense over the
three-year term of the credit facility ending October 2009.
On May 9, 2007, the Company received consent under the 2006
Credit Facility for the cash acquisition of Midwest. This
consent stipulates that the cash consideration should not exceed
$C18,500, plus actual working capital, working capital
adjustment and reasonable fees and expenses incurred in
connection with the acquisition of Midwest.
On May 16, 2007, the Company entered into an amendment to
allow for cash payments not to exceed $21,000 during the term of
the 2006 Credit Facility with respect to fractional shares or as
a part of a separately negotiated inducement to the holders of
the 6.5% Senior Convertible Notes and
2.75% Convertible Senior Notes.
As of September 30, 2007, there were no borrowings
outstanding under the 2006 Credit Facility and there were
$80,168 in outstanding letters of credit, consisting of $59,846
issued for projects in continuing operations and $20,322 issued
for projects related to Discontinued Operations. As of
December 31, 2006, there were no borrowings outstanding
under the 2006 Credit Facility and there were $64,545 in
outstanding letters of credit, consisting of $41,920 issued for
projects in continuing operations and $22,625 issued for
projects related to Discontinued Operations. The Company is
currently prohibited from borrowing under the 2006 Credit
Facility due to debt incurrence restrictions in the
6.5% Notes.
The 2006 Credit Facility includes customary affirmative and
negative covenants, such as limitations on the creation of new
indebtedness and on certain liens, restrictions on certain
transactions and maintenance of the following financial
covenants:
|
|
Ø
|
A consolidated tangible net worth in an amount of not less than
the sum of $116,561 plus 50 percent of consolidated net
income earned in each quarter ended after December 31, 2006;
|
|
Ø
|
A maximum senior leverage ratio of 1.00 to 1.00 for the quarter
ending September 30, 2007, and for each quarter thereafter;
|
|
Ø
|
A fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 3.00 to 1.00, for
the quarter ended September 30, 2007, and for each quarter
thereafter; and
|
|
Ø
|
A prohibition on capital expenditures (cost of assets added
through purchase or capital lease) if the Companys
liquidity falls below $50,000.
|
If these covenants are violated, it would be considered an event
of default entitling the lenders to terminate the remaining
commitment, call all outstanding letters of credit, and
accelerate any principal and interest outstanding. As of
September 30, 2007;
|
|
Ø
|
The Companys consolidated tangible net worth was $151,934,
which was approximately $35,373 in excess of the tangible net
worth the Company was required to maintain under the credit
facility;
|
|
Ø
|
The Company is in compliance with the maximum senior leverage
ratio because it has incurred no revolving advance or other
senior debt;
|
|
Ø
|
The Companys fixed charge coverage ratio was 6.17 to
1.00; and
|
|
Ø
|
The Companys cash balance as of September 30, 2007
was $58,709, which allowed the Company to add $53,926 of fixed
assets to the balance sheet during the previous 12 months.
|
At September 30, 2007, the Company was in compliance with
all of these covenants.
6.5% Senior
Convertible Notes
On December 22, 2005, the Company entered into a purchase
agreement (the Purchase Agreement) for a private
placement of $65,000 aggregate principal amount of its
6.5% Senior Convertible Notes due 2012 (the
6.5% Notes). The private placement closed on
December 23, 2005. During the first
F-71
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
quarter of 2006, the initial purchasers of the 6.5% Notes
exercised their options to purchase an additional $19,500
aggregate principal amount of the 6.5% Notes. Collectively,
the primary offering and the purchase option of the
6.5% Notes total $84,500. The net proceeds of the offering
were used to retire existing indebtedness and provide additional
liquidity to support working capital needs.
The 6.5% Notes are governed by an indenture, dated
December 23, 2005, that was entered into by and among the
Company, as issuer, Willbros USA, Inc., as guarantor
(WUSAI), and The Bank of New York Mellon
Corporation, as Trustee (the Indenture), and were
issued under the Purchase Agreement by and among the Company and
the initial purchasers of the 6.5% Notes (the
Purchasers), in a transaction exempt from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the Securities Act). The 6.5% Notes
are convertible into shares of the Companys stock and
these underlying shares have been registered with the SEC. The
6.5% Notes, however, have not been registered with the SEC.
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company and WUSAI have
agreed to indemnify the Purchasers, their affiliates and agents,
against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the
Securities Act. The 6.5% Notes are convertible into shares
of the Companys common stock at a conversion rate of
56.9606 shares of common stock per $1,000.00 principal
amount of notes (representing a conversion price of
approximately $17.56 per share resulting in
1,825,589 shares at September 30, 2007), subject to
adjustment in certain circumstances. The 6.5% Notes are
general senior unsecured obligations. Interest is due
semi-annually on June 15 and December 15, and began on
June 15, 2006.
The 6.5% Notes mature on December 15, 2012 unless the
notes are repurchased or converted earlier. The Company does not
have the right to redeem the 6.5% Notes. The holders of the
6.5% Notes have the right to require the Company to
purchase the 6.5% Notes for cash, including unpaid
interest, on December 15, 2010. The holders of the
6.5% Notes also have the right to require the Company to
purchase the 6.5% Notes for cash upon the occurrence of a
fundamental change, as defined in the Indenture. In addition to
the amounts described above, the Company will be required to pay
a make-whole premium to the holders of the
6.5% Notes who elect to convert their notes into the
Companys common stock in connection with a fundamental
change. The make-whole premium is payable in additional shares
of common stock and is calculated based on a formula with the
premium ranging from 0 percent to 28.0 percent
depending on when the fundamental change occurs and the price of
the Companys stock at the time the fundamental change
occurs.
Upon conversion of the 6.5% Notes, the Company has the
right to deliver, in lieu of shares of its common stock, cash or
a combination of cash and shares of its common stock. Under the
Indenture, the Company is required to notify holders of the
6.5% Notes of its method for settling the principal amount
of the 6.5% Notes upon conversion. This notification, once
provided, is irrevocable and legally binding upon the Company
with regard to any conversion of the 6.5% Notes. On
March 21, 2006, the Company notified holders of the
6.5% Notes of its election to satisfy its conversion
obligation with respect to the principal amount of any
6.5% Notes surrendered for conversion by paying the holders
of such surrendered 6.5% Notes 100 percent of the
principal conversion obligation in the form of common stock of
the Company. Until the 6.5% Notes are surrendered for
conversion, the Company will not be required to notify holders
of its method for settling the excess amount of the conversion
obligation relating to the amount of the conversion value above
the principal amount, if any. In the event of a default of
$10,000 or more on any credit agreement, including the 2006
Credit Facility and the 2.75% Notes, a corresponding event
of default would result under the 6.5% Notes.
On May 18, 2007, the Company completed two transactions to
induce conversion with two Purchasers of the 6.5% Notes.
Under the conversion agreements, the Purchasers converted
$36,250 in aggregate principal amount of the 6.5% Notes
into 2,064,821 shares of the Companys $0.05 par
value common stock. As an inducement for the Purchasers to
convert, the Company made aggregate cash payments to the
Purchasers of $8,972, plus $1,001 in accrued interest for the
current interest period. In connection
F-72
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
with the induced conversion, the Company recorded a loss on
early extinguishment of debt of $10,894. The loss on early
extinguishment of debt is inclusive of the cash premium paid to
induce conversion and $1,922 of unamortized debt costs.
On May 29 and May 30, 2007, the Company completed two
additional transactions to induce conversion with two Purchasers
of the 6.5% Notes. Under the conversion agreements, the
Purchasers converted $16,200 in aggregate principal amount of
the 6.5% Notes into 922,761 shares of the
Companys common stock. As an inducement for the Purchasers
to convert, the Company made aggregate cash payments to the
Purchasers of $3,748, plus $480 in accrued interest for the
current interest period. In connection with the induced
conversion, the Company recorded a loss on early extinguishment
of debt of $4,481. The loss on early extinguishment of debt is
inclusive of the cash premium paid to induce conversion and the
write-off of $733 of unamortized debt issue costs.
As of September 30, 2007, $32,050 of aggregate principal
amount of the 6.5% Notes remains outstanding. Unamortized
debt issuance costs of $1,361 and $4,103 associated with the
6.5% Notes are included in other assets at
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively, and are being amortized over the seven-year period
ending December 2012.
A covenant in the indenture for the 6.5% Notes prohibits
the Company from incurring any additional indebtedness if its
consolidated leverage ratio exceeds 4.00 to 1.00. As of
September 30, 2007, this covenant precluded the Company
from borrowing under the 2006 Credit Facility. Capital leases
are not considered indebtedness under this provision except to
the extent by which they exceed $50,000.
2.75% Convertible
Senior Notes
On March 12, 2004, the Company completed a primary offering
of $60,000 of 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes (the
2.75% Notes). On April 13, 2004, the
initial purchasers of the 2.75% Notes exercised their
option to purchase an additional $10,000 aggregate principal
amount of the notes. Collectively, the primary offering and
purchase option of the 2.75% Notes totaled $70,000. The
2.75% Notes are general senior unsecured obligations.
Interest is paid semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 and
payments began on September 15, 2004. The 2.75% Notes
mature on March 15, 2024 unless the notes are repurchased,
redeemed or converted earlier. The Company may redeem the
2.75% Notes for cash on or after March 15, 2011, at
100 percent of the principal amount of the notes plus
accrued interest. The holders of the 2.75% Notes have the
right to require the Company to purchase the 2.75% Notes,
including unpaid interest, on March 15, 2011, 2014, and
2019, or upon a change of control related event. On
March 15, 2011, or upon a change in control event, the
Company must pay the purchase price in cash. On March 15,
2014 and 2019, the Company has the option of providing its
common stock in lieu of cash or a combination of common stock
and cash to fund purchases. The holders of the 2.75% Notes
may, under certain circumstances, convert the notes into shares
of the Companys common stock at an initial conversion
ratio of 51.3611 shares of common stock per $1,000.00
principal amount of notes (representing a conversion price of
approximately $19.47 per share resulting in
3,595,277 shares at September 30, 2007 subject to
adjustment in certain circumstances). The notes will be
convertible only upon the occurrence of certain specified events
including, but not limited to, if, at certain times, the closing
sale price of the Companys common stock exceeds
120 percent of the then current conversion price, or $23.36
per share, based on the initial conversion price. In the event
of a default under any Company credit agreement other than the
indenture covering the 2.75% Notes, (1) in which the
Company fails to pay principal or interest on indebtedness with
an aggregate principal balance of $10,000 or more; or
(2) in which indebtedness with a principal balance of
$10,000 or more is accelerated, an event of default would result
under the 2.75% Notes.
On June 10, 2005, the Company received a letter from a law
firm representing an investor claiming to be the owner of in
excess of 25 percent of the 2.75% Notes asserting
that, as a result of the Companys
F-73
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
failure to timely file with the SEC its 2004
Form 10-K
and its Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, it was placing the
Company on notice of an event of default under the indenture
dated as of March 12, 2004 between the Company, as issuer,
and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as trustee (the
Indenture), which governs the 2.75% Notes. The
Company indicated that it did not believe that it had failed to
perform its obligations under the relevant provisions of the
Indenture referenced in the letter. On August 19, 2005, the
Company entered into a settlement agreement with the beneficial
owner of the 2.75% Notes on behalf of whom the notice of
default was sent, pursuant to which the Company agreed to use
commercially reasonable efforts to solicit the requisite vote to
approve an amendment to the Indenture (the Indenture
Amendment). The Company obtained the requisite vote and on
September 22, 2005, the Indenture Amendment became
effective.
The Indenture Amendment extended the initial date on or after
which the 2.75% Notes may be redeemed by the Company to
March 15, 2013 from March 15, 2011. In addition, a new
provision was added to the Indenture which requires the Company,
in the event of a fundamental change which is a
change of control event in which 10 percent or more of the
consideration in the transaction consists of cash, to make a
coupon make-whole payment equal to the present value (discounted
at the U.S. treasury rate) of the lesser of (a) two
years of scheduled payments of interest on the 2.75% Notes
or (b) all scheduled interest on the 2.75% Notes from
the date of the transaction through March 15, 2013.
On August 15, 2007, the Company notified holders of the
2.75% Notes of its election to satisfy its conversion
obligation with respect to the principal amount of any
2.75% Notes surrendered for conversion by paying the
holders of such surrendered
2.75% Notes 100 percent of the principal
conversion obligation in the form of common stock of the
Company. Until the 2.75% Notes are surrendered for
conversion, the Company will not be required to notify holders
of its method for settling the excess amount of the conversion
obligation relating to the amount of the conversion value above
the principal amount, if any.
Unamortized debt issue costs of $1,787 and $2,175 associated
with the 2.75% Notes are included in other assets at
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively, and are being amortized over the seven-year period
ending March 2011.
2004 Credit
Facility
On March 12, 2004, the existing $125,000 June 2002
credit agreement with Calyon was amended, restated and increased
to $150,000 (the 2004 Credit Facility). The 2004
Credit Facility would have matured on March 12, 2007 but
was replaced on October 27, 2006 by the 2006 Credit
Facility (See 2006 Credit Facility above). The 2004
Credit Facility was available for standby and commercial letters
of credit, borrowings or a combination thereof. Borrowings were
limited to the lesser of 40 percent of the borrowing base
or $30,000. Interest was payable quarterly at a base rate plus a
margin ranging from 0.75 percent to 2.00 percent or on
a Eurodollar rate plus a margin ranging from 1.75 percent
to 3.00 percent. The 2004 Credit Facility was
collateralized by substantially all of the Companys
assets, including stock of the Companys principal
subsidiaries, prohibited the payment of cash dividends and
required the Company to maintain certain financial ratios. The
borrowing base was calculated using varying percentages of cash,
accounts receivable, accrued revenue, contract cost and
recognized income not yet billed, property, plant and equipment,
and spare parts.
During the period from August 6, 2004 to August 18,
2006, the Company entered into various amendments and waivers to
the 2004 Credit Facility with its syndicated bank group to waive
non-compliance with certain financial and non-financial
covenants. Among other things, the amendments provided that
(1) certain financial covenants and reporting obligations
were waived
and/or
modified to reflect the Companys current and anticipated
future operating performance, (2) the ultimate reduction of
the facility to $50,000 with a letter of credit limit of $50,000
less the face amount of letters of credit issued prior to
August 18, 2006, and required that each new letter of
credit must be fully cash
F-74
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
collateralized and that a letter of credit fee of
0.25 percent be paid for each cash collateralized letter of
credit and (3) the Company maintain a minimum cash balance
of $15,000. The Sixth Amendment expired on September 30,
2006, and availability under the 2004 Credit Facility was
reduced to zero. On October 27, 2006, the 2004 Credit
Facility was replaced with the 2006 Credit Facility.
Capital
Leases
During 2006 and 2007 the Company entered into multiple capital
lease agreements to acquire construction equipment. These leases
in aggregate added approximately $34,725, net, to the
Companys total capital lease obligation. In aggregate,
these leases have interest rates ranging from 6.80% to 8.95% and
have typical terms of at least 36 months.
Assets held under capital leases at September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006 are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Construction equipment
|
|
$
|
40,681
|
|
|
$
|
10,662
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,446
|
|
Furniture and office equipment
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets held under capital lease
|
|
|
41,216
|
|
|
|
12,643
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(6,743
|
)
|
|
|
(1,572
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets under capital lease
|
|
$
|
34,473
|
|
|
$
|
11,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
INCOME (LOSS) PER
SHARE
|
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by
dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is based
on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each
period and the assumed exercise of potential dilutive stock
options and warrants and vesting of restricted stock and
restricted stock rights less the number of treasury shares
assumed to be purchased from the proceeds using the average
market price of the Companys stock for each of the periods
presented. The Companys convertible notes were included in
the calculation of diluted income per share under the
if-converted method. Additionally, diluted income
per share for continuing operations is calculated excluding the
after-tax interest expense associated with the convertible notes
since these notes are treated as if converted into common stock.
F-75
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
Basic and diluted income (loss) from continuing operations per
common share for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006 are computed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
ended
|
|
|
Nine months
ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
10,272
|
|
|
$
|
(4,965
|
)
|
|
$
|
(33,446
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,598
|
)
|
Add: Interest and debt issuance costs associated with
convertible notes
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations applicable to
common shares
|
|
$
|
11,052
|
|
|
$
|
(4,965
|
)
|
|
$
|
(33,446
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,598
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding for basic
income (loss) per share
|
|
|
28,804,907
|
|
|
|
21,557,695
|
|
|
|
27,421,927
|
|
|
|
21,480,730
|
|
Weighted average number of dilutive potential common shares
outstanding
|
|
|
6,039,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding for diluted
income (loss) per share
|
|
|
34,844,482
|
|
|
|
21,557,695
|
|
|
|
27,421,927
|
|
|
|
21,480,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per common share from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.87
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.87
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company incurred net losses for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, and the three and nine months ended
2006 and has therefore excluded the securities listed below from
the computation of diluted loss per share, as the effect would
be anti-dilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
ended
|
|
|
Nine months
ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
2.75% Convertible senior notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,595,277
|
|
|
|
3,595,277
|
|
|
|
3,595,277
|
|
6.5% Senior convertible notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,813,171
|
|
|
|
1,825,589
|
|
|
|
4,813,171
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
833,900
|
|
|
|
686,750
|
|
|
|
833,900
|
|
Warrants to purchase common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
558,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock and restricted stock rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,000
|
|
|
|
612,637
|
|
|
|
248,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,490,348
|
|
|
|
7,278,607
|
|
|
|
9,490,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
04-8,
The Effect of Contingently Convertible Instruments on
Diluted Earnings per Share, the 5,420,866 shares
issuable upon conversion of both the 6.5% Notes and the
2.75% Notes will be included in diluted earnings per share
if those securities are dilutive, regardless of whether the
conversion prices of $19.47 and $17.56, respectively, have been
met.
F-76
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
The Companys segments are strategic business units that
are managed separately as each has different operational
requirements and strategies. Beginning the first quarter of
2007, the Company defines its operating segments based on the
Companys core lines of business rather than geographic
markets as presented in prior periods. The Companys
operating segments are defined as the following reportable
segments: Construction, Engineering, and
Engineering, Procurement and Construction
(EPC). The three reportable segments
operate primarily in the United States, Canada, and the Middle
East. Previously, the Companys reportable segments were
U.S. & Canada and International. Prior
period balances have been reclassified to reflect this change.
Management evaluates the performance of each operating segment
based on operating margin. The Companys corporate
operations include the general, administrative, and financing
functions of the organization. The costs of these functions are
allocated between the three operating segments. The Company has
chosen not to allocate Government fines to the segments. The
Companys corporate operations also include various other
assets, some of which are allocated between the three operating
segments. There are no material inter-segment revenues in the
periods presented.
The following tables reflect the Companys reconciliation
of segment operating results to the net income (loss) in the
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006:
For the three months ended September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Engineering
|
|
|
EPC
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
193,984
|
|
|
$
|
25,584
|
|
|
$
|
27,148
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
246,716
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
163,404
|
|
|
|
19,034
|
|
|
|
24,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,089
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,996
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,457
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
12,216
|
|
|
|
3,349
|
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,448
|
|
Government fines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,616
|
|
|
|
22,553
|
|
|
|
26,825
|
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
227,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income:
|
|
$
|
13,368
|
|
|
$
|
3,031
|
|
|
$
|
323
|
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
18,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,369
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,272
|
|
Net loss from discontinued operations, net of provision for
income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,126
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-77
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
For the three months ended September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Engineering
|
|
|
EPC
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
91,204
|
|
|
$
|
20,216
|
|
|
$
|
14,046
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
125,466
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
82,912
|
|
|
|
17,292
|
|
|
|
13,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,418
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,325
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
8,549
|
|
|
|
2,144
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,786
|
|
|
|
19,666
|
|
|
|
14,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
$
|
(2,582
|
)
|
|
$
|
550
|
|
|
$
|
(277
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
(2,309
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,277
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,965
|
)
|
Net loss from discontinued operations, net of provision for
income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(22,101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
Engineering
|
|
EPC
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
476,638
|
|
$
|
66,040
|
|
$
|
67,490
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
610,168
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
427,966
|
|
|
49,166
|
|
|
61,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
538,790
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
11,629
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,223
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
31,083
|
|
|
7,063
|
|
|
4,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,295
|
|
Government fines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
470,678
|
|
|
56,740
|
|
|
66,890
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
616,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
$
|
5,960
|
|
$
|
9,300
|
|
$
|
600
|
|
$
|
(22,000
|
)
|
|
|
(6,140
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,513
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,446
|
)
|
Net loss from discontinued operations, net of provision for
income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(54,940
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-78
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Engineering
|
|
EPC
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
257,587
|
|
|
$
|
55,621
|
|
$
|
38,973
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
352,181
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
238,172
|
|
|
|
46,598
|
|
|
35,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320,628
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6,450
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
2,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,180
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
25,460
|
|
|
|
6,390
|
|
|
1,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270,082
|
|
|
|
53,660
|
|
|
39,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
$
|
(12,495
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,961
|
|
$
|
(226
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
(10,760
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,027
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,598
|
)
|
Net loss from discontinued operations, net of provision for
income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(64,847
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets by segment as of September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
326,025
|
|
$
|
198,528
|
Engineering
|
|
|
27,525
|
|
|
15,342
|
EPC
|
|
|
7,881
|
|
|
13,336
|
Corporate
|
|
|
77,765
|
|
|
68,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets
|
|
$
|
439,196
|
|
$
|
295,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The information contained in this note pertains to continuing
and discontinued operations.
Stock ownership
plans
During May 1996, the Company established the Willbros Group,
Inc. 1996 Stock Plan (the 1996 Plan) with
1,125,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance to
provide for awards to key employees of the Company, and the
Willbros Group, Inc. Director Stock Plan (the Director
Plan) with 125,000 shares of common stock authorized
for issuance to provide for the grant of stock options to
non-employee directors. The number of shares authorized for
issuance under the 1996 Plan and the Director Plan was increased
to 4,075,000 and 225,000, respectively, by stockholder approval.
The Director Plan expired August 16, 2006. In 2006, the
Company established the 2006 Director Restricted Stock Plan
(the 2006 Director Plan) with
50,000 shares authorized for issuance to grant shares of
restricted stock and restricted stock rights to non-employee
directors.
Restricted stock and restricted stock rights, also described
collectively as restricted stock units (RSUs),
and options granted under the 1996 Plan vest generally over a
three to four year period. Options granted under the Director
Plan are fully vested. Restricted stock and restricted stock
rights granted under the 2006 Director Plan vest one year
after the date of grant. At September 30, 2007, the
F-79
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
1996 Plan had 424,379 shares and the 2006 Director
Plan had 34,419 shares available for grant. Of the shares
available at September 30, 2007, 225,000 shares in the
1996 Stock Plan are reserved for future grants required under
employment agreements. Certain provisions allow for accelerated
vesting based on increases of share prices and on eligible
retirement. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007
and 2006, $35 and $381, respectively, of compensation expense
was recognized due to accelerated vesting of RSUs due to
retirements and separation from the Company.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair
value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share Based
Payment (SFAS 123R) using the modified
prospective application method. Under this method, compensation
cost recognized in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006, includes the applicable
amounts of: (a) compensation expense of all share-based
payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of,
January 1, 2006 (based on the grant-date fair value
estimated in accordance with the original provisions of
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation), and (b) compensation cost for all
share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006
(based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with
the provisions of SFAS No. 123R). The Company uses the
Black-Scholes valuation method to determine the fair value of
stock options granted as of the grant date.
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for awards
granted under the incentive plans following the recognition and
measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board
(APB) Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, and related interpretations, as
permitted by SFAS No. 123. Because it is the
Companys policy to grant stock options at the market price
on the date of grant, the intrinsic value of these grants was
zero and, therefore, no compensation expense was recorded.
Share-based compensation related to RSUs is recorded based
on the Companys stock price as of the grant date.
Recognition of share-based compensation related to RSUs
was not impacted by the adoption of SFAS No. 123R.
Expense from both stock options and RSUs totaled $3,010
and $3,054, respectively, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006 and $1,088 and $1,186,
respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2007
and 2006.
The fair values of options granted during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006, were estimated using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted
average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value
|
|
$
|
9.69
|
|
|
$
|
6.72
|
|
Weighted average assumptions used:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
40.13
|
%
|
|
|
45.66
|
%
|
Expected lives
|
|
|
3.51
|
yrs
|
|
|
3.46
|
yrs
|
Risk-free interest rates
|
|
|
4.42
|
%
|
|
|
4.66
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Volatility is calculated using an analysis of historical
volatility over the expected life of the option. The Company
believes that the historical volatility of the Companys
stock is the best method for estimating future volatility. The
expected lives of options are determined based on the
Companys historical share option exercise experience. The
Company believes the historical experience method is the best
estimate of future exercise patterns currently available. The
risk-free interest rates are determined using the implied yield
currently available for zero-coupon U.S. government issues,
with a remaining term equal to the expected life of the options.
F-80
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
Stock option activity for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
806,750
|
|
|
$
|
13.46
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
27.80
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
107,500
|
|
|
|
14.40
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
|
|
8.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
686,750
|
|
|
$
|
13.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
512,583
|
|
|
$
|
12.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007, the aggregate intrinsic value of
stock options outstanding and stock options exercisable was
$13,946 and $11,162, respectively. The weighted average
remaining contractual term of outstanding options is
4.70 years and the weighted average remaining contractual
term of the exercisable options is 5.73 years at
September 30, 2007. The total intrinsic value of options
exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2007
and 2006 was $1,491 and $2,174, respectively.
The total fair value of options vested during the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was $229 and $184,
respectively, and $88 and $158 during the three months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The Companys non-vested options at September 30, 2007
and the changes in non-vested options during the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
grant-date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
fair
value
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, January 1, 2007
|
|
|
202,500
|
|
|
$
|
6.40
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
9.69
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
38,333
|
|
|
|
5.97
|
|
Forfeited or expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, September 30, 2007
|
|
|
174,167
|
|
|
$
|
6.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys RSU activity and related information for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
grant-date
|
|
|
|
RSUs
|
|
|
fair
value
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
300,116
|
|
|
$
|
17.85
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
430,985
|
|
|
|
21.70
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
105,586
|
|
|
|
17.57
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
12,878
|
|
|
|
20.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding September 30, 2007
|
|
|
612,637
|
|
|
$
|
20.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The RSUs outstanding at September 30, 2007 exclude
225,000 RSUs having a weighted average grant-date fair
value of $21.27, which are vested but have a deferred share
issuance date. The total fair value of RSUs vested during
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was
$1,855 and $3,174, respectively.
As of September 30, 2007, there was a total of $10,006 of
unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures,
related to all non-vested share-based compensation arrangements
granted under
F-81
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
the Companys stock ownership plans. That cost is expected
to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
2.1 years.
Warrants to
purchase common stock
On October 27, 2006, the Company completed a private
placement of equity to certain accredited investors pursuant to
which the Company issued and sold 3,722,360 shares of the
Companys common stock resulting in net proceeds of
$48,748. In conjunction with the private placement, the Company
also issued warrants to purchase an additional
558,354 shares of the Companys common stock. Each
warrant is exercisable, in whole or in part, until
60 months from the date of issuance. A warrant holder may
elect to exercise the warrant by delivery of payment to the
Company at the exercise price of $19.03 per share, or pursuant
to a cashless exercise as provided in the warrant agreement. The
fair value of the warrants was $3,423 on the date of the grant,
as calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. At
September 30, 2007, all warrants to purchase common stock
remained outstanding.
Induced
conversion of 6.5% notes
During the second quarter of 2007, the Company induced
conversion and entered into conversion agreements with four
purchasers of the 6.5% Notes. The purchasers converted an
amount of $52,450 of aggregate principal that resulted in the
issuance of 2,987,582 shares of the Companys common
stock.
For interim financial reporting, the Company records the tax
provision based on actual current financial results for the
period. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, the Company recorded an income tax
provision of $6,081 and $7,793, respectively, on income before
income taxes from continuing operations for the three months
ended of $16,353 and losses for the nine months ended of
$25,653. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006, the Company recorded an income tax
provision of $379 and $1,811, respectively, on losses before
income taxes from continuing operations of $4,586 and $16,787.
During the three months ended September 30, 2007, the
Company recognized increased income tax expense due to improved
financial performance in the U.S. The circumstances that
gave rise to the Company recording tax provisions while
incurring losses for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 and 2006, were primarily due to taxable income being
generated in certain tax jurisdictions, and the Company having
incurred non-deductible expenses and expenses in Panama, where
the Company is domiciled, which receive no tax benefit.
|
|
12.
|
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
RISK
|
The Company attempts to negotiate contracts that provide for
payment in U.S. dollars, but it may be required to take all
or a portion of payment under a contract in another currency. To
mitigate
non-U.S. currency
exchange risk, the Company seeks to match anticipated
non-U.S. currency
revenue with expenses in the same currency whenever possible. To
the extent it is unable to match
non-U.S. currency
revenue with expenses in the same currency, the Company may use
forward contracts, options or other common hedging techniques in
the same
non-U.S. currencies.
The Company had no derivative financial instruments to hedge
currency risk at September 30, 2007 or December 31,
2006.
|
|
13.
|
CONTINGENCIES,
COMMITMENTS AND OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES
|
Resolution of
criminal and regulatory matters
The Company and its subsidiary, WII, have reached an agreement
in principle with representatives of the DOJ, subject to
approval by the DOJ, to settle its previously disclosed
investigation into possible
F-82
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
violations of the FCPA. In addition, the Company has reached an
agreement in principle with the staff of the SEC to resolve its
previously disclosed investigation of possible violations of the
FCPA and possible violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These investigations stem
primarily from the Companys former operations in Bolivia,
Ecuador and Nigeria. As described more fully below, if accepted
by the DOJ and the SEC and approved by the court, the
settlements together will require us to pay over approximately
three years, a total of $32.3 million in penalties and
disgorgement, plus post-judgment interest on $7.725 million
of that amount. In addition, WGI and WII will, for a period of
approximately three years, each be subject to Deferred
Prosecution Agreements (DPAs) with the DOJ. Finally,
we will be subject to a permanent injunction barring future
violations of certain provisions of the federal securities laws.
The terms of the agreement in principle with the DOJ include the
following:
|
|
Ø
|
A twelve-count criminal information will be filed against WGI
and WII as part of the execution of the DPAs between the DOJ and
each of WGI and WII. The twelve counts include substantive
violations of the anti-bribery provisions of the FCPA, and
violations of the FCPAs
books-and-records
provisions. All twelve counts relate to operations in Nigeria,
Ecuador and Bolivia during the period from 1996 to 2005.
|
|
Ø
|
Provided that WGI and WII fully comply with the DPAs for a
period of approximately three years, the DOJ will agree not to
continue the criminal prosecution and, at the conclusion of that
time, will move to dismiss the criminal information.
|
|
Ø
|
The DPAs will require, for each of their three year terms, among
other things, full cooperation with the government; compliance
with all federal criminal law, including but not limited to the
FCPA; and a three year monitor for WGI and its subsidiary
companies, primarily focused on international operations outside
of North America, the costs of which are payable by WGI.
|
|
Ø
|
The Company will be subject to $22,000 in fines related to FCPA
violations. The fines are payable in four equal installments of
$5,500, first on signing, and annually for approximately three
years thereafter, with no interest payable on the unpaid amounts.
|
With respect to the agreement in principle with the staff of the
SEC:
|
|
Ø
|
The Company will consent to the filing in federal district court
of a complaint by the SEC (the Complaint), without
admitting or denying the allegations in the Complaint, and to
the imposition by the court of a final judgment of permanent
injunction against us. The Complaint will allege civil
violations of the antifraud provisions of the Securities Act and
the Securities Exchange Act, the FCPAs anti-bribery
provisions, and the reporting, books and records and internal
controls provisions of the Securities Exchange Act. The final
judgment will not take effect until it is confirmed by the
court, and will permanently enjoin us from future violations of
those provisions.
|
|
Ø
|
The final judgment will order the Company to pay $10,300,
consisting of $8,900 for disgorgement of profits and
approximately $1,400 of pre-judgment interest. The disgorgement
and pre-judgment interest is payable in four equal installments
of $2,575, first on signing, and annually for approximately
three years thereafter. Post-judgment interest will be payable
on the outstanding balance.
|
Failure by the Company to comply with the terms and conditions
of either settlement could result in resumed prosecution and
other regulatory sanctions.
The agreements in principle are contingent upon the
parties agreement to the terms of final settlement
agreements, approval by the DOJ and the SEC and confirmation by
a federal district court. There can be no assurance that the
settlements will be finalized.
As a result of the agreements in principle, we have increased
the accrual related to these investigations by $8,300, bringing
the aggregate reserves for those matters to $32,300. An
$8,300 net liability increase
F-83
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
is recorded in the third quarter of 2007 and is comprised of:
1) a $2,000 reduction in the Companys second quarter
of 2007 estimate of $24,000 ($0.07 per basic share and $0.06 per
diluted share for the three months ended September 30,
2007, and $0.07 per basic and diluted share for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007) in fines resulting from the
DOJ actions that was recorded as a charge to continuing
operations, and 2) an additional $10,300 of profit
disgorgement, ($0.36 per basic share and $0.29 per diluted share
for the three months ended September 30, 2007, and $0.38
per basic and diluted share for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007) inclusive of accrued interest on
the disgorged profit, resulting from SEC actions. The profit
disgorgement is related to a single Nigeria project included in
the February 7, 2007 sale of the Companys Nigeria
assets and operations. The disgorged profit was previously
recognized in the results from discontinued operations, and
accordingly, the full amount of $10,300 is recorded as a charge
to discontinued operations in the third quarter of 2007. The
aggregate reserves reflect our estimate of the expected probable
loss with respect to these matters. If the proposed settlements
are not finalized the amount reserved may not reflect eventual
losses.
If final agreements with the DOJ and the SEC are not approved,
the Companys liquidity position and financial results
could be materially adversely affected by any additional
settlement amount. For a further discussion of the risks
associated with the settlements in principle with the SEC, DOJ
and OFAC, see Part II. Other Information, Item 1A.
Risk Factors; specifically, the risk factor entitled, We
have reached agreements in principle to settle investigations
involving possible violations of the FCPA and possible
violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
In addition, the Company previously disclosed that the United
States Department of Treasurys Office of Foreign Assets
Control (OFAC) was investigating allegations of
violations of the Sudanese Sanctions Regulations occurring
during October 2003. The Company voluntarily reported this
matter to OFAC and also has reported to OFAC corrective measures
and improvements to the Companys OFAC compliance program.
OFAC and Willbros USA, Inc. have agreed in principle to settle
the allegations pursuant to which the Company will pay a total
of $6.6 as a civil penalty.
Class-action
lawsuit
On May 18, 2005, a securities
class-action
lawsuit, captioned Legion Partners, LLP v. Willbros Group,
Inc. et al., was filed in the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Texas against the Company and certain
of its present and former officers and directors. Thereafter,
three nearly identical lawsuits were filed. Plaintiffs purported
to represent a class composed of all persons who purchased or
otherwise acquired Willbros Group, Inc. common stock
and/or other
securities between May 6, 2002 and May 16, 2005,
inclusive. The complaint sought unspecified monetary damages and
other relief. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the
complaint on March 9, 2006, and briefing on that motion was
completed on June 14, 2006. While the motion to dismiss was
pending, the Company reached a settlement in principle with the
Lead Plaintiff and the parties signed a Memorandum of
Understanding (Settlement). The Settlement provides
for a payment of $10,500 to resolve all claims against all
defendants. On February 15, 2007, the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of Texas issued an Order
approving the Settlement. The Order dismissed with prejudice all
claims against all defendants.
Other
circumstances
Operations outside the United States may be subject to certain
risks, which ordinarily would not be expected to exist in the
United States, including foreign currency restrictions, extreme
exchange rate fluctuations, expropriation of assets, civil
uprisings and riots, war, unanticipated taxes including income
taxes, excise duties, import taxes, export taxes, sales taxes or
other governmental assessments, availability of suitable
personnel and equipment, termination of existing contracts and
leases, government instability and legal systems of decrees,
laws, regulations, interpretations and court decisions which are
not always fully developed and which may be retroactively
applied. Management is
F-84
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
not presently aware of any events of the type described in the
countries in which it operates that would have a material effect
on the financial statements, and have not been provided for in
the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
Based upon the advice of local advisors in the various work
countries concerning the interpretation of the laws, practices
and customs of the countries in which it operates, management
believes the Company follows the current practices in those
countries; however, because of the nature of these potential
risks, there can be no assurance that the Company may not be
adversely affected by them in the future. The Company insures
substantially all of its equipment in countries outside the
United States against certain political risks and terrorism
through political risk insurance coverage that contains a
20 percent co-insurance provision.
The Company has the usual liability of contractors for the
completion of contracts and the warranty of its work. Where work
is performed through a joint venture, the Company also has
possible liability for the contract completion and warranty
responsibilities of its joint venture partners. In addition, the
Company acts as prime contractor on a majority of the projects
it undertakes and is normally responsible for the performance of
the entire project, including subcontract work. Management is
not aware of any material exposure related thereto which has not
been provided for in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
Certain post-contract completion audits and reviews are
periodically conducted by clients
and/or
government entities. While there can be no assurance that claims
will not be received as a result of such audits and reviews,
management does not believe a legitimate basis exists for any
material claims. At present, it is not possible for management
to estimate the likelihood of such claims being asserted or, if
asserted, the amount or nature or ultimate disposition thereof.
Commitments
From time to time, the Company enters into commercial
commitments, usually in the form of commercial and standby
letters of credit, surety bonds and financial guarantees.
Contracts with the Companys customers may require the
Company to provide letters of credit or surety bonds with regard
to the Companys performance of contracted services. In
such cases, the commitments can be called upon in the event of
failure to perform contracted services. Likewise, contracts may
allow the Company to issue letters of credit or surety bonds in
lieu of contract retention provisions, in which the client
withholds a percentage of the contract value until project
completion or expiration of a warranty period. Retention
commitments can be called upon in the event of warranty or
project completion issues, as prescribed in the contracts. At
September 30, 2007, the Company had approximately $64,192
of letters of credit related to continuing operations and
$20,322 of letters of credit related to Discontinued Operations
in Nigeria. Additionally, the Company had $203,917 of surety
bonds outstanding related to continuing operations. These
amounts represent the maximum amount of future payments the
Company could be required to make. As of September 30,
2007, no other liability has been recognized for letters of
credit and surety bonds, other than $1,575 recorded as the fair
value of the letters of credit outstanding for the Nigeria
operations. See Note 4 Discontinuance of
Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement
for further discussion of these letters of credit.
In connection with the private placement of the 6.5% Notes
on December 23, 2005, the Company entered into a
Registration Rights Agreement with the Purchasers. The
Registration Rights Agreement required the Company to file a
registration statement with respect to the resale of the shares
of the Companys common stock issuable upon conversion of
the 6.5% Notes no later than June 30, 2006 and to use
its best efforts to cause such registration statement to be
declared effective no later than December 31, 2006. The
Company is also required to keep the registration statement
effective after December 31, 2006. In the event, the
Company is unable to satisfy its obligations under the
Registration Rights Agreement, the Company will owe additional
interest to the holders of the
F-85
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
6.5% Notes at a rate per annum equal to 0.5 per cent
of the principal amount of the 6.5% Notes for the first
90 days and 1.0 percent per annum from and after the
91st day following such event. The additional penalty
interest, if incurred, is payable in conjunction with the
scheduled semi-annual interest payments on June 15 and December
15 as set forth in the Registration Rights Agreement. The
Company filed the registration statement on June 30, 2006
and it was declared effective on January 18, 2007 by the
SEC. The Company paid an additional $22 of penalty interest to
the holders of the 6.5% Notes as a result of the
registration having been declared effective after
December 31, 2006.
In addition, on March 14, 2007, in connection with the
filing of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, the Company
suspended the use of the registration statement. On
March 30, 2007, the Company filed a post-effective
amendment to the registration statement to incorporate by
reference the 2006
Form 10-K.
The post-effective amendment was declared effective on
May 4, 2007.
In connection with the private placement of common stock and
warrants on October 27, 2006, the Company entered into a
Registration Rights Agreement with the buyers (the 2006
Registration Rights Agreement). The 2006 Registration
Rights Agreement requires the Company to file a registration
statement with respect to the resale of the common stock,
including the common stock underlying the warrants, no later
than 60 days after the closing of the private placement,
and to use its reasonable best efforts to cause the registration
statement to be declared effective no later than 120 days
after the closing of the private placement. In the event of a
delay in the filing or effectiveness of the registration
statement, or for any period during which the effectiveness of
the registration statement is not maintained or is suspended by
the Company other than as permitted under the 2006 Registration
Rights Agreement, the Company will be required to pay each buyer
monthly an amount in cash equal to 1.25 percent of such
buyers aggregate purchase price of its common stock and
warrants, but the Company shall not be required to pay any buyer
an aggregate amount that exceeds 10 percent of such
buyers aggregate purchase price.
On March 14, 2007, in connection with the filing of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, the Company
suspended the use of the registration statement. On
March 30, 2007, the Company filed a post-effective
amendment to the registration statement to incorporate by
reference the 2006
Form 10-K.
The post-effective amendment was declared effective on
May 4, 2007. The Company was required to make registration
delay payments equal to 1.25 percent of the purchase price
for the shares and warrants sold in the private placement. The
first such payment was owed as of April 3, 2007 and paid as
of April 30, 2007. Thereafter, the penalty continued to
accrue based on 1.25 percent of the purchase price
beginning on April 3, 2007, the day after the date on which
a 20-day
grace period expired, and for each
30-day
period thereafter (prorated for any partial
30-day
period) and ending on the effective date of the post-effective
amendment. The Company paid $997 of registration delay payments
subsequent to March 31, 2007 for the period in which the
use of the registration statement was suspended until the
suspension was lifted on May 4, 2007.
In addition to the matters discussed above, the Company is party
to a number of other legal proceedings. Management believes that
the nature and number of these proceedings are typical for a
firm of similar size engaged in a similar type of business and
that none of these proceedings is material to the Companys
financial position. See Note 4 Discontinuance
of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services
Agreement for discussion of commitments and contingencies
associated with Discontinued Operations.
|
|
14.
|
PARENT, GUARANTOR
AND NON-GUARANTOR CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
The 6.5% Notes are convertible into shares of the
Companys stock and these underlying shares have been
registered with the SEC. The 6.5% Notes however have not
been registered with the SEC. The
F-86
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
6.5% Notes are guaranteed by a subsidiary of the Company,
Willbros USA, Inc. (WUSAI). There are currently no
restrictions on the ability of WUSAI to transfer funds to WGI in
the form of cash dividends or advances. Under the terms of the
Indenture for the 6.5% Notes, WUSAI may not sell or
otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of its assets, or
merge with or into another entity, other than the Company,
unless no default exists under the Indenture and the acquirer
assumes all obligations of WUSAI under the Indenture. WGI is a
holding company with no significant operations, other than
through its subsidiaries.
Separate financial statements for the guarantor subsidiary
(WUSAI) are not provided as the Company complies with the
exception to
Rule 3-10(a)(1)
of
Regulation S-X,
set forth in sub-paragraph (e) of such rule, since the
subsidiary guarantor is 100 percent owned by the parent
issuer, the guarantee is full and unconditional, and no other
subsidiary of the parent guarantees the securities. This
footnote contains condensed consolidated financial statements
with separate columns for the parent company (the Parent), the
subsidiary guarantor (WUSAI), the non-guarantor subsidiaries of
the parent, consolidating adjustments, and the total
consolidated amounts.
The Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements present
investments in subsidiaries using the equity method of
accounting.
F-87
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
September 30,
2007 and December 31, 2006
Willbros Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed
consolidating balance sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
(Guarantor)
|
|
|
guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
37,029
|
|
|
$
|
1,178
|
|
|
$
|
20,502
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
58,709
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
83,709
|
|
|
|
97,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181,733
|
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,599
|
|
|
|
3,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,029
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
15,744
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,322
|
|
Parts and supplies inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
2,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,773
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,294
|
|
|
|
(636
|
)
|
|
|
4,658
|
|
Receivables from affiliated companies
|
|
|
243,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(243,318
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
280,421
|
|
|
|
126,765
|
|
|
|
129,992
|
|
|
|
(243,954
|
)
|
|
|
293,224
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,892
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,978
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,522
|
|
|
|
63,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,393
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
(40,171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,007
|
|
|
|
9,878
|
|
|
|
9,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
243,257
|
|
|
$
|
201,057
|
|
|
$
|
203,323
|
|
|
$
|
(203,783
|
)
|
|
$
|
443,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
8,075
|
|
|
$
|
8,685
|
|
|
$
|
2,552
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,312
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
2,449
|
|
|
|
74,476
|
|
|
|
57,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,425
|
|
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,300
|
|
|
|
1,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,891
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
3,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,671
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,639
|
|
Payables to affiliated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,204
|
|
|
|
193,750
|
|
|
|
(243,954
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
10,524
|
|
|
|
140,876
|
|
|
|
263,492
|
|
|
|
(243,954
|
)
|
|
|
170,938
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
126,275
|
|
|
|
20,780
|
|
|
|
5,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,360
|
|
Long-term liability for unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,062
|
|
|
|
2,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,492
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
5,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,369
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
136,799
|
|
|
|
167,390
|
|
|
|
277,161
|
|
|
|
(243,954
|
)
|
|
|
337,396
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
1,467
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
1,467
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
273,840
|
|
|
|
89,156
|
|
|
|
8,526
|
|
|
|
(97,682
|
)
|
|
|
273,840
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(181,912
|
)
|
|
|
(55,497
|
)
|
|
|
(95,054
|
)
|
|
|
150,551
|
|
|
|
(181,912
|
)
|
Other stockholders equity components
|
|
|
13,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,657
|
|
|
|
(12,657
|
)
|
|
|
13,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
106,548
|
|
|
|
33,667
|
|
|
|
(73,838
|
)
|
|
|
40,171
|
|
|
|
106,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
243,257
|
|
|
$
|
201,057
|
|
|
$
|
203,323
|
|
|
$
|
(203,783
|
)
|
|
$
|
443,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-88
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
Condensed
consolidating balance sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
(Guarantor)
|
|
|
guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
24,776
|
|
|
$
|
4,895
|
|
|
$
|
7,972
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,643
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
81,004
|
|
|
|
56,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,104
|
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,225
|
|
|
|
8,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,027
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
16,092
|
|
|
|
1,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,299
|
|
Parts and supplies inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,069
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,192
|
|
Receivables from affiliated companies
|
|
|
280,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(280,853
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
305,664
|
|
|
|
104,776
|
|
|
|
369,747
|
|
|
|
(280,853
|
)
|
|
|
499,334
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,755
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,792
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,115
|
|
|
|
32,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,347
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
(42,228
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
6,344
|
|
|
|
5,007
|
|
|
|
7,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
269,780
|
|
|
$
|
149,653
|
|
|
$
|
409,174
|
|
|
$
|
(238,625
|
)
|
|
$
|
589,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,382
|
|
|
$
|
1,180
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,562
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
17,349
|
|
|
|
63,120
|
|
|
|
41,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,352
|
|
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,779
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,947
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,657
|
|
|
|
1,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,556
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,980
|
|
|
|
(171,888
|
)
|
|
|
182,092
|
|
Payables to affiliated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,923
|
|
|
|
86,042
|
|
|
|
(108,965
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
17,349
|
|
|
|
106,861
|
|
|
|
485,152
|
|
|
|
(280,853
|
)
|
|
|
328,509
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
154,500
|
|
|
|
7,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,577
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,611
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,728
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
171,849
|
|
|
|
115,549
|
|
|
|
485,506
|
|
|
|
(280,853
|
)
|
|
|
492,051
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
217,036
|
|
|
|
89,156
|
|
|
|
8,526
|
|
|
|
(97,682
|
)
|
|
|
217,036
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(120,603
|
)
|
|
|
(55,060
|
)
|
|
|
(84,177
|
)
|
|
|
139,237
|
|
|
|
(120,603
|
)
|
Other stockholders equity components
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(713
|
)
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
97,931
|
|
|
|
34,104
|
|
|
|
(76,332
|
)
|
|
|
42,228
|
|
|
|
97,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
269,780
|
|
|
$
|
149,653
|
|
|
$
|
409,174
|
|
|
$
|
(238,625
|
)
|
|
$
|
589,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-89
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
Condensed
consolidating statements of operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
(Guarantor)
|
|
|
guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
162,305
|
|
|
$
|
91,667
|
|
|
$
|
(7,256
|
)
|
|
$
|
246,716
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,262
|
|
|
|
79,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,089
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,418
|
|
|
|
2,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,457
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
5,119
|
|
|
|
14,840
|
|
|
|
4,745
|
|
|
|
(7,256
|
)
|
|
|
17,448
|
|
Government fines
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,119
|
|
|
|
145,520
|
|
|
|
86,611
|
|
|
|
(7,256
|
)
|
|
|
227,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(3,119
|
)
|
|
|
16,785
|
|
|
|
5,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,722
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
13,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,748
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interestnet
|
|
|
(543
|
)
|
|
|
(653
|
)
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,042
|
)
|
Othernet
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(1,175
|
)
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,327
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
10,064
|
|
|
|
14,957
|
|
|
|
5,080
|
|
|
|
(13,748
|
)
|
|
|
16,353
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,159
|
|
|
|
(1,078
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
10,064
|
|
|
|
7,798
|
|
|
|
6,158
|
|
|
|
(13,748
|
)
|
|
|
10,272
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of provision for
income taxes
|
|
|
(8,918
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,126
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,146
|
|
|
$
|
7,809
|
|
|
$
|
5,939
|
|
|
$
|
(13,748
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-90
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
(Guarantor)
|
|
|
guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
77,699
|
|
|
$
|
55,600
|
|
|
$
|
(7,833
|
)
|
|
$
|
125,466
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
65,456
|
|
|
|
47,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,418
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,236
|
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
983
|
|
|
|
11,478
|
|
|
|
6,464
|
|
|
|
(7,833
|
)
|
|
|
11,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
984
|
|
|
|
79,170
|
|
|
|
55,454
|
|
|
|
(7,833
|
)
|
|
|
127,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(984
|
)
|
|
|
(1,471
|
)
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,309
|
)
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in loss of consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(19,015
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interestnet
|
|
|
(2,102
|
)
|
|
|
(335
|
)
|
|
|
(272
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,709
|
)
|
Othernet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(22,101
|
)
|
|
|
(1,824
|
)
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
19,015
|
|
|
|
(4,586
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(650
|
)
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(22,101
|
)
|
|
|
(1,174
|
)
|
|
|
(705
|
)
|
|
|
19,015
|
|
|
|
(4,965
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(570
|
)
|
|
|
(16,566
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(22,101
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,744
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,271
|
)
|
|
$
|
19,015
|
|
|
$
|
(22,101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-91
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
Condensed
consolidating statements of operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
(Guarantor)
|
|
|
guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
391,298
|
|
|
$
|
233,430
|
|
|
$
|
(14,560
|
)
|
|
$
|
610,168
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337,128
|
|
|
|
201,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
538,790
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,695
|
|
|
|
4,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,223
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
6,820
|
|
|
|
37,035
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
(14,560
|
)
|
|
|
42,295
|
|
Government fines
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,820
|
|
|
|
382,858
|
|
|
|
219,190
|
|
|
|
(14,560
|
)
|
|
|
616,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(28,820
|
)
|
|
|
8,440
|
|
|
|
14,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,140
|
)
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in loss of consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
4,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,721
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interestnet
|
|
|
(2,011
|
)
|
|
|
(605
|
)
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,119
|
)
|
Othernet
|
|
|
(16,402
|
)
|
|
|
(408
|
)
|
|
|
(584
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,394
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(42,512
|
)
|
|
|
7,427
|
|
|
|
14,153
|
|
|
|
(4,721
|
)
|
|
|
(25,653
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,316
|
|
|
|
3,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(42,512
|
)
|
|
|
3,111
|
|
|
|
10,676
|
|
|
|
(4,721
|
)
|
|
|
(33,446
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
(12,428
|
)
|
|
|
(599
|
)
|
|
|
(8,467
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(54,940
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,512
|
|
|
$
|
2,209
|
|
|
$
|
(4,721
|
)
|
|
$
|
(54,940
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-92
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
(Guarantor)
|
|
|
guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
219,027
|
|
|
$
|
159,326
|
|
|
$
|
(26,172
|
)
|
|
$
|
352,181
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
177,868
|
|
|
|
142,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320,628
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,930
|
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,180
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
6,354
|
|
|
|
39,311
|
|
|
|
13,640
|
|
|
|
(26,172
|
)
|
|
|
33,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,355
|
|
|
|
223,109
|
|
|
|
159,649
|
|
|
|
(26,172
|
)
|
|
|
362,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(6,355
|
)
|
|
|
(4,082
|
)
|
|
|
(323
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,760
|
)
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in loss of consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(53,569
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interestnet
|
|
|
(4,922
|
)
|
|
|
(698
|
)
|
|
|
(512
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,132
|
)
|
Othernet
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(64,847
|
)
|
|
|
(4,794
|
)
|
|
|
(715
|
)
|
|
|
53,569
|
|
|
|
(16,787
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(64,847
|
)
|
|
|
(5,155
|
)
|
|
|
(2,165
|
)
|
|
|
53,569
|
|
|
|
(18,598
|
)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of provision for
income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
(48,049
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(64,847
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,355
|
)
|
|
$
|
(50,214
|
)
|
|
$
|
53,569
|
|
|
$
|
(64,847
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-93
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
Condensed
consolidating statement of cash flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
(Guarantor)
|
|
|
guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities of continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(12,329
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,850
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,450
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(22,629
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of
discontinued operations
|
|
|
(2,128
|
)
|
|
|
(599
|
)
|
|
|
5,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(14,457
|
)
|
|
|
(7,449
|
)
|
|
|
2,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,649
|
)
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations, net
|
|
|
105,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,568
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,613
|
)
|
|
|
(5,277
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,890
|
)
|
Acquisition of Midwest
|
|
|
(24,154
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,154
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,393
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used) in investing activities of continuing
operations
|
|
|
81,414
|
|
|
|
(9,220
|
)
|
|
|
(5,242
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,952
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
81,414
|
|
|
|
(9,220
|
)
|
|
|
(5,242
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,952
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(12,993
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,993
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net
|
|
|
1,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,519
|
|
Advances from (repayments to) parent/affiliates
|
|
|
(42,684
|
)
|
|
|
27,281
|
|
|
|
15,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of bank and other debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,647
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,665
|
)
|
Payments on capital leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,428
|
)
|
|
|
(2,079
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,507
|
)
|
Costs of debt issuance and other
|
|
|
(546
|
)
|
|
|
(253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(799
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing
operations
|
|
|
(54,704
|
)
|
|
|
12,953
|
|
|
|
13,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,445
|
)
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(54,704
|
)
|
|
|
12,953
|
|
|
|
13,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,445
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) all activities
|
|
$
|
12,253
|
|
|
$
|
(3,716
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,529
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-94
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
Condensed
consolidating statement of cash flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
(Guarantor)
|
|
|
guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities of continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(6,940
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,533
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,244
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(12,717
|
)
|
Net cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(880
|
)
|
|
|
(58,705
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,585
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(6,940
|
)
|
|
|
(4,413
|
)
|
|
|
(60,949
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,302
|
)
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,082
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,082
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,242
|
)
|
|
|
(10,147
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,389
|
)
|
Increase in restricted cash
|
|
|
(1,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,500
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing
operations
|
|
|
(1,500
|
)
|
|
|
22,840
|
|
|
|
5,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,436
|
|
Cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,191
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,191
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(1,500
|
)
|
|
|
22,840
|
|
|
|
2,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,245
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes
|
|
|
19,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,500
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net
|
|
|
2,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,226
|
|
Advances from (repayments to) parent/affiliates
|
|
|
(52,714
|
)
|
|
|
(6,741
|
)
|
|
|
59,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of bank and other debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,519
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,555
|
)
|
Costs of debt issuance and other
|
|
|
(4,296
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,330
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing
operations
|
|
|
(35,284
|
)
|
|
|
(16,260
|
)
|
|
|
59,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,841
|
|
Cash provided by financing activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(35,284
|
)
|
|
|
(16,260
|
)
|
|
|
59,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,841
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) all activities
|
|
$
|
(43,724
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,167
|
|
|
$
|
1,100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(40,457
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-95
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
Acquisition
On October 31, 2007, WGI, Willbros USA, Inc., a subsidiary
of WGI, and the shareholders of Integrated Service Company LLC
(InServ) entered into a share purchase agreement
(InServ SPA), pursuant to which the Company will
acquire all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of
InServ for $225,000 (InServ Purchase Price),
consisting of $202,500 payable in cash at closing and
637,475 shares of the Companys common stock having a
value of $22,500 (determined by the average closing price of
common stock over the 20 trading days ending on the second
trading day before the execution of the InServ SPA). The cash
portion of the closing price will be subject to a post-closing
adjustment to account for any change in InServs working
capital from a predetermined target to InServs actual
working capital on the closing date. A total of $20,000 of the
cash portion of the purchase price will be placed into escrow
for a period of 18 months and released from escrow in
one-third increments on each of the six-month,
12-month and
18-month
anniversaries of the closing date. The escrowed cash will secure
performance of the shareholders obligations under the
InServ SPA, including working capital adjustments and
indemnification obligations for breaches of the
shareholders representations, warranties and covenants
included in the InServ SPA. The InServ SPA contains customary
representations, warranties, covenants and indemnification
provisions.
As a condition of the InServ SPA, the Company shall obtain the
necessary financing to fund the InServ Purchase Price. The
Company anticipates financing the cash portion of the InServ
Purchase Price through a public offering of its common stock.
Closing of this acquisition is subject to other typical closing
conditions and necessary regulatory approvals. The Company
expects to close the offering and this acquisition in the fourth
quarter of 2007.
Headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma, InServ is a fully integrated
downstream contractor with a highly experienced management team
averaging over 30 years of industry experience.
InServs core competencies include turnkey project services
through program management, engineering, procurement and
construction services. Additionally, InServ provides services
for the overhaul of high utilization fluid catalytic cracking
units, the main gasoline-producing unit in refineries. InServ
also provides similar overhaul services for other refinery
process units as well as specialty services associated with
welding, piping, and process heaters. Additionally InServ
manufactures specialty components such as: heater coils, alloy
piping, and other components which require high levels of
expertise for refineries and petrochemical plants. InServ also
provides multiple secondary services to its clients including
tank services, safety services and heater services.
With the acquisition, the Company will significantly expand its
service offering and address the downstream market for
integrated solutions on turnaround, maintenance and capital
projects for the hydrocarbon processing and petrochemical
industries.
Related
Party Relationships
In early 2007, InServ retained Growth Capital Partners, L.P., an
investment banking firm, to assist InServ with the possible sale
of the company. John T. McNabb, II, the Companys
Chairman of the Board of Directors, is the founder and Chairman
of the Board of Directors of Growth Capital Partners, which will
receive a customary fee from InServ in the event that InServ is
sold. Mr. McNabb and Randy R. Harl, the Companys
President and Chief Executive Officer and one of the
Companys directors, served on the InServ Board of
Directors from 2006 until September 18, 2007.
Messrs. McNabb and Harl resigned from the Board of
Directors of InServ prior to the commencement of discussions
between the Company and InServ with respect to the possible
acquisition of InServ and Mr. McNabb has recused himself
from providing any further advice to InServ as a principal of
Growth Capital Partners. Messrs McNabb and Harl each own
3,000 shares of InServ, or individually less than
0.4 percent of the outstanding equity interests of InServ.
The Company formed a special committee of
F-96
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
the Board of Directors, consisting of all of the independent
directors other than Mr. McNabb, to consider, evaluate and
approve the acquisition of InServ. In addition, the special
committee has obtained an opinion dated October 30, 2007
from a nationally recognized investment banking and valuation
firm that the consideration to be paid by the Company in the
proposed acquisition is fair to the Company, from a financial
point of view.
Financing Activities
Credit
Facility
The Company has received commitments from a group of lenders,
led by Calyon, to replace its existing synthetic credit facility
with a $150,000 senior secured revolving credit facility (the
2007 Credit Facility). The 2007 Credit Facility can
be increased to $200,000, subject to Calyons consent, on
or before the second anniversary of the closing date. The 2007
Credit Facility includes more favorable rates and improved terms
and conditions. The entire facility will be available for
performance letters of credit and 33 percent of the
facility will be available for cash borrowings and financial
letters of credit. A condition precedent to close the 2007
Credit Facility is that the Company receives a minimum of
$100,000 proceeds from the planned public offering.
F-97
Integrated
Service Company, LLC (DBA InServ) and Subsidiary
Report
of independent certified public accountants
Members
Integrated Service Company, LLC
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Integrated Service Company, LLC (an Oklahoma limited liability
company) and subsidiary as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
and the related consolidated statements of operations,
members equity, and cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2006. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America as
established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we
express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Integrated Service Company, LLC and subsidiary as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2006 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Tulsa, Oklahoma
March 16, 2007
F-98
Integrated
Service Company, LLC (DBA InServ) and Subsidiary
Consolidated
balance sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
112,532
|
|
|
$
|
107,208
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
28,411,117
|
|
|
|
22,348,875
|
|
Costs and estimated earnings of uncompleted contracts in excess
of billings
|
|
|
14,509,921
|
|
|
|
7,929,367
|
|
Prepaids and other assets
|
|
|
530,945
|
|
|
|
585,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
43,564,515
|
|
|
|
30,971,119
|
|
Property, plant and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and building
|
|
|
5,971,202
|
|
|
|
5,893,739
|
|
Field equipment
|
|
|
10,806,562
|
|
|
|
9,505,661
|
|
Furniture, fixtures, office and computer equipment
|
|
|
1,517,545
|
|
|
|
1,322,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,295,309
|
|
|
|
16,722,313
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(9,244,073
|
)
|
|
|
(8,170,463
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
9,051,236
|
|
|
|
8,551,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
440,735
|
|
|
|
198,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
53,056,486
|
|
|
$
|
39,721,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
11,024,608
|
|
|
$
|
6,674,774
|
|
Billings of uncompleted contracts in excess of costs and
estimated earnings
|
|
|
7,527,835
|
|
|
|
3,292,882
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
1,351,844
|
|
|
|
967,893
|
|
Accrued wages, payroll taxes and employee benefits
|
|
|
2,867,217
|
|
|
|
1,879,808
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,385,584
|
|
|
|
993,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
24,157,088
|
|
|
|
13,808,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion
|
|
|
3,826,191
|
|
|
|
3,223,243
|
|
Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members equity
|
|
|
26,528,647
|
|
|
|
22,754,439
|
|
Less: members notes receivable
|
|
|
(1,455,440
|
)
|
|
|
(64,958
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total members equity
|
|
|
25,073,207
|
|
|
|
22,689,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and members equity
|
|
$
|
53,056,486
|
|
|
$
|
39,721,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated balance sheets.
F-99
Integrated
Service Company, LLC (DBA InServ) and Subsidiary
Consolidated
statements of operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years
ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenues earned
|
|
$
|
200,482,659
|
|
|
$
|
147,348,728
|
|
|
$
|
114,019,620
|
|
Cost of revenues earned
|
|
|
166,056,301
|
|
|
|
123,207,915
|
|
|
|
93,418,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS profit
|
|
|
34,426,358
|
|
|
|
24,140,813
|
|
|
|
20,601,600
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
16,634,534
|
|
|
|
11,623,505
|
|
|
|
10,636,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
17,791,824
|
|
|
|
12,517,308
|
|
|
|
9,964,707
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(756,196
|
)
|
|
|
(404,907
|
)
|
|
|
(287,913
|
)
|
Miscellaneous income
|
|
|
81,266
|
|
|
|
239,998
|
|
|
|
644,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
17,116,894
|
|
|
$
|
12,352,399
|
|
|
$
|
10,320,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-100
Integrated
Service Company, LLC (DBA InServ) and Subsidiary
Consolidated
statements of members equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members
notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members
equity
|
|
|
receivable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2003
|
|
$
|
9,418,764
|
|
|
$
|
(129,914
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,288,850
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
10,320,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,320,888
|
|
Compensation expense for option agreement
|
|
|
84,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,734
|
|
Member distributions
|
|
|
(2,986,269
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,986,269
|
)
|
Payment on members note receivable
|
|
|
6,496
|
|
|
|
32,478
|
|
|
|
38,974
|
|
Purchase of member interest
|
|
|
60,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2004
|
|
|
16,904,763
|
|
|
|
(97,436
|
)
|
|
|
16,807,327
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
12,352,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,352,399
|
|
Compensation expense for option agreement
|
|
|
150,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,175
|
|
Member distributions
|
|
|
(5,152,542
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,152,542
|
)
|
Payment on members note receivable
|
|
|
6,027
|
|
|
|
32,478
|
|
|
|
38,505
|
|
Purchase of member interest
|
|
|
(1,506,383
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,506,383
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005
|
|
|
22,754,439
|
|
|
|
(64,958
|
)
|
|
|
22,689,481
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
17,116,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,116,894
|
|
Compensation expense for option agreement
|
|
|
122,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,304
|
|
Member distributions
|
|
|
(8,681,386
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,681,386
|
)
|
Payment on members notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,478
|
|
|
|
32,478
|
|
Purchase of member interest
|
|
|
(6,799,956
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,799,956
|
)
|
Notes receivable on options exercised
|
|
|
1,914,220
|
|
|
|
(1,422,960
|
)
|
|
|
491,260
|
|
Interest received from notes receivable
|
|
|
102,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
26,528,647
|
|
|
$
|
(1,455,440
|
)
|
|
$
|
25,073,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-101
Integrated
Service Company, LLC (DBA InServ) and Subsidiary
Consolidated
statements of cash flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years
ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
17,116,894
|
|
|
$
|
12,352,399
|
|
|
$
|
10,320,888
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities-Depreciation
|
|
|
1,174,711
|
|
|
|
1,329,059
|
|
|
|
1,165,127
|
|
(Gain) loss on disposal of equipment
|
|
|
(2,226
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,222
|
|
Compensation expense for option agreement
|
|
|
122,304
|
|
|
|
150,175
|
|
|
|
84,734
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,791
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(6,062,242
|
)
|
|
|
(7,646,747
|
)
|
|
|
(478,000
|
)
|
Costs and estimated earnings of uncompleted contracts in excess
of billings
|
|
|
(6,580,554
|
)
|
|
|
(4,278,174
|
)
|
|
|
1,760,013
|
|
Prepaids and other assets
|
|
|
(187,850
|
)
|
|
|
(70,249
|
)
|
|
|
(40,720
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
4,349,834
|
|
|
|
2,839,307
|
|
|
|
(427,279
|
)
|
Billings of uncompleted contracts in excess of costs and
estimated earnings
|
|
|
4,234,953
|
|
|
|
1,304,670
|
|
|
|
768,845
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,379,944
|
|
|
|
715,748
|
|
|
|
(1,074,338
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
(1,571,126
|
)
|
|
|
(5,656,211
|
)
|
|
|
1,830,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
15,545,768
|
|
|
|
6,696,188
|
|
|
|
12,151,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(1,678,237
|
)
|
|
|
(2,037,030
|
)
|
|
|
(1,871,234
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of equipment
|
|
|
6,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(1,671,871
|
)
|
|
|
(2,037,030
|
)
|
|
|
(1,652,205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from short-term borrowings
|
|
|
56,686,835
|
|
|
|
50,248,148
|
|
|
|
26,503,502
|
|
Payments of short-term borrowings
|
|
|
(56,686,835
|
)
|
|
|
(50,248,148
|
)
|
|
|
(27,304,668
|
)
|
Proceeds from long-term borrowings
|
|
|
9,400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(8,413,101
|
)
|
|
|
(967,891
|
)
|
|
|
(3,805,710
|
)
|
Repayment on members notes receivable
|
|
|
32,478
|
|
|
|
32,478
|
|
|
|
32,478
|
|
Purchase of member interest
|
|
|
(6,799,956
|
)
|
|
|
(1,506,383
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Member tax distributions
|
|
|
(8,681,386
|
)
|
|
|
(5,152,542
|
)
|
|
|
(2,986,269
|
)
|
Payments received for units
|
|
|
491,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest received for members notes receivable
|
|
|
102,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(13,868,573
|
)
|
|
|
(7,594,338
|
)
|
|
|
(7,560,667
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
5,324
|
|
|
|
(2,935,180
|
)
|
|
|
2,938,411
|
|
Cash, beginning of year
|
|
|
107,208
|
|
|
|
3,042,388
|
|
|
|
103,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, end of year
|
|
$
|
112,532
|
|
|
$
|
107,208
|
|
|
$
|
3,042,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
754,714
|
|
|
$
|
404,907
|
|
|
$
|
376,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
711,798
|
|
|
$
|
323,542
|
|
|
$
|
330,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable from members
|
|
$
|
(1,422,960
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-102
Notes
to consolidated financial statements
December 31,
2006 and 2005
ANATURE OF
BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Integrated Service Company, LLC (DBA InServ and formerly The
Cust-O-Fab Companies, LLC) and its wholly owned subsidiary,
Construction & Turnaround Services, LLC (collectively
the Company), are Oklahoma limited liability companies.
The Company is engaged in the chemical and refinery turn-around
business, the fabrication and field erection of process heaters,
and the maintenance and repair services of above-ground storage
tanks primarily for the chemical and petrochemical industries.
The Company provides services primarily throughout the United
States, Central America and South America.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared based
upon accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America and include the accounts of InServ and its
wholly owned subsidiary. Intercompany accounts and transactions
have been eliminated.
|
|
3.
|
Revenue and Cost
Recognition
|
Revenues from construction contracts are recognized on the
percentage of completion method which is measured for each
individual contract in progress at the end of an accounting
period. Management considers expended costs to be the best
available measure of progress on uncompleted contracts.
Contract costs include all direct material and labor costs and
indirect costs related to contract performance, including
indirect labor, supplies, tools, repairs and depreciation costs.
General and administrative costs are charged to expense as
incurred.
The Company grants credit to its customers for the purchase of
services and equipment of the chemical and petrochemical
industries. Accounts receivable are recorded at amounts billed
to customers, with no discounting, less an allowance for
doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based
on managements assessment of the realizability of customer
accounts. Managements assessment is based on the overall
creditworthiness of the Companys customers and any
specific disputes. The Company had no provision for doubtful
accounts for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.
|
|
5.
|
Costs and
Estimated Earnings of Uncompleted Contracts in Excess of
Billings
|
Revenues are recognized as earned (see Revenue and Cost
Recognition section of Note A above), but customers
are billed in accordance with the terms of their contract. In
some instances, customers are billed at intervals in advance of
earnings; the excess of the amount previously billed over the
revenue earned is deferred and reported as a current liability
in the consolidated financials as billings of uncompleted
contracts in excess of costs and estimated earnings. To
the extent that revenues earned exceed the amounts billed to
date (either due to processing lag time or contractual terms),
the difference is reflected as a current asset, costs and
estimated earnings of uncompleted contracts in excess of
billings in the consolidated financial statements.
F-103
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
The comparison of billings to costs and estimated earnings of
uncompleted contracts at December 31, 2006 and 2005 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and estimated earnings
|
|
$
|
215,306,327
|
|
|
$
|
162,842,944
|
|
Billings
|
|
|
208,324,241
|
|
|
|
158,206,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,982,086
|
|
|
$
|
4,636,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The difference between billings and costs and estimated earnings
of uncompleted contracts is included in the accompanying balance
sheets under the following captions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and estimated earnings of uncompleted contracts in excess
of billings
|
|
$
|
14,509,921
|
|
|
$
|
7,929,367
|
|
Billings of uncompleted contracts in excess of costs and
estimated earnings
|
|
|
7,527,835
|
|
|
|
3,292,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,982,086
|
|
|
$
|
4,636,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Property, Plant
and Equipment
|
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and
depreciated using the straight-line and accelerated methods over
the following estimated useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
39-40
|
|
Field equipment
|
|
|
5-8
|
|
Furniture, fixtures, office and computer equipment
|
|
|
3-7
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
Remaining life of lease
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Repairs and
Maintenance Costs
|
The cost of repairs and maintenance is charged to expense as
incurred; significant improvements are capitalized and
depreciated over the remaining useful life of the asset.
For federal tax purposes, the Company has elected to be treated
as a partnership with each member being separately taxed on
their ratable share of taxable income. Accordingly, no income
tax expense has been recorded in the consolidated financial
statements, except for states which allow the corporation to pay
taxes on the members behalf and income taxes paid to
foreign countries. Income tax expense is included in selling,
general and administrative expenses on the consolidated
statements of operations.
|
|
9.
|
Use of Estimates
in the Preparation of the Consolidated Financial
Statements
|
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Significant estimates include, but are not limited to, the
amount of revenue recognized and managements determination
of the allowance for doubtful accounts.
F-104
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform
with the 2006 presentation. These reclassifications had no
impact on net income.
|
|
11.
|
Recently Issued
Accounting Standards
|
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157 clarifies the
principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions
market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability
and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the
information used to develop those assumptions.
SFAS No. 157 is effective for the Companys
fiscal year beginning January 1, 2007. The Company is
currently evaluating what impact, if any, this statement will
have on its financial statements.
The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Statement No. 123 revised, Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123R) on January 1, 2006. The
Statement requires all entities to recognize the fair value
of share-based payment awards (stock compensation)
classified in equity, unless they are unable to reasonably
estimate the fair value of the award. The effect of
SFAS 123 (R) is not material, and therefore, the Company
has made no disclosure of the pro forma net income as if
SFAS 123 (R) had been adopted.
BLINE OF
CREDIT
On February 13, 2006, the Company amended its agreement
with Bank of Oklahoma for a revolving line of credit up to
$13,250,000 that expires June 30, 2007. The interest rate
on the line of credit is LIBOR plus 2.00% (7.225% at
December 31, 2006). The weighted average interest rates for
the years ended December 31, 2006, and 2005 were 6.43% and
6.05%, respectively. There were no outstanding borrowings on the
line of credit at December 31, 2006 and 2005. The credit
agreement requires, among other things, that the Company
maintain minimum net worth and debt service coverage ratios and
a maximum leverage ratio. The line of credit is collateralized
by a first security interest in the Companys property in
Rogers County, Oklahoma. Commitment fees of 0.175% accrue daily
on the unused portion of the line of credit. Commitment fees
paid for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 totaled
approximately $15,000 and $10,000, respectively. There were
approximately $1,598,000 and $1,691,000 letters of credit
outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
F-105
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
CLONG-TERM
DEBT
Long-term debt at December 31, 2006 and 2005 consists of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable to BOK due April 30, 2008; monthly principal
payments of $80,357 plus interest, with the remaining principal
balance due at maturity; interest at LIBOR plus 2.00% (5.94% at
December 31, 2005). Secured by equipment and real estate
and guaranteed by a member of the Company
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,178,576
|
|
Note payable to BOK due January 31, 2013; monthly principal
payments of $111,905 plus interest, with the remaining principal
balance due at maturity; interest at LIBOR plus 2.00% (7.225% at
December 31, 2006). Secured by equipment and real estate
and guaranteed by a member of the Company
|
|
|
5,169,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
8,987
|
|
|
|
12,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,178,035
|
|
|
|
4,191,136
|
|
Lesscurrent maturities
|
|
|
1,351,844
|
|
|
|
967,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,826,191
|
|
|
$
|
3,223,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future maturities of long-term debt at December 31, 2006,
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
1,351,844
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1,342,857
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,342,857
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,140,477
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,178,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The debt agreements with BOK contain certain restrictive
covenants that require the maintenance of specified financial
and operating ratios. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the
Company was in compliance with the covenants of the debt
agreements.
DCONTINGENCIES
The Company is a party to various legal proceedings incidental
to its business. Certain claims, suits and complaints arising in
the ordinary course of business have been filed or are pending
against the Company. In the opinion of management, all such
matters are either covered by insurance, are without merit or
involve amounts, which, if resolved unfavorably, would not have
a significant effect on the financial position or results of
operations of the Company. Once management determines that
information pertaining to a legal proceeding indicates that it
is probable that a liability has been incurred, an accrual is
established equal to managements estimate of the likely
exposure. For matters that are covered by insurance, the Company
accrues the related deductible.
EMEMBERS
EQUITY
There are certain restrictions on transfers of membership
interests as defined by the Operating Agreement of the Company.
In addition, the Company has the right of first refusal to
purchase all of the offered membership interest at the price and
on the terms established with the proposed purchaser. If the
Company does not exercise its option, the other members shall
have the right to purchase the offered membership interest.
F-106
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
FSTOCK
OPTION AND APPRECIATION RIGHT PLANS
In 1998, the Company granted one employee the option to purchase
an ownership interest in the Company equal to a 2.5% ownership
interest, subject to dilution as a result of the issuance of any
subsequent ownership interests and options held by any other
members of the Company. The option holder exercised 20% of his
options in 1998 for cash. On December 31, 2002, the option
holder exercised the remaining 80% of his options by delivering
a promissory note to the Company for approximately $162,400,
payable in five equal annual installments of approximately
$32,480, plus accrued interest at the Chase Manhattan Prime
rate, beginning on December 31, 2003. The promissory note
is collateralized by the option holders pledge of all of
his ownership interests in the Company, whether owned at the
time of the pledge or acquired thereafter.
On January 3, 2006, the Company granted four members 52,500
options to purchase an ownership interest in the Company at an
exercise price of $33.88 per unit. On the same day, the option
holders exercised 20% of the options in cash and exercised the
remaining 80% of the options by delivering promissory notes to
the Company. These promissory notes totaled $1,422,960 with
interest accrued at LIBOR plus 2.00%. Interest is payable
annually on December 31 of each year. The notes are due when the
Company exercises their repurchase right or the member sells the
units. The Company expects the notes to be paid within
10 years. The promissory notes are collateralized by the
option holders pledge of all of their ownership interest
in the Company, whether owned at the time of the pledge or
acquired thereafter.
The Company accounts for members equity option grants in
accordance with SFAS 123(R). As the Company could not
reasonably estimate the calculated value of the options on the
grant date they have been accounted for based on the grant-date
intrinsic value. Accordingly, compensation expense is calculated
annually based on the current intrinsic value of the ownership
interest as compared with the grant-date intrinsic value of the
options. The current and grant-date intrinsic value were
determined using a third party valuation. The Company recorded
compensation expense of approximately $123,000, $150,000 and
$85,000 related to these options for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
The Company created a unit stock appreciation rights plan for
certain non-equity employees as of January 1, 2006. The
exercise price of each option is the appraised value of the
Companys membership interest on the date of grant. The
options vest over a three year period on the first day of the
year beginning on the option grant date. If an employee retires,
dies, becomes disabled, or more than 50% of the Company is
purchased, the employee is entitled to receive an amount of cash
from the Company equal to (i) the total number of
exercisable options, multiplied by (ii) the excess (if any)
of the lower of the appraised value or the book value for each
unit option over the unit exercise price.
A summary of the status of stock appreciation rights options
under the Companys plan is presented in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options/Rights
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
Shares under/options:
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
11,630
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
Vested
|
|
|
(3,627
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
7,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The stock appreciation rights options issued in 2006 grant date
price was $33.88. There were no stock appreciation rights
options in 2005 or 2004.
F-107
Notes to
consolidated financial statements
Under SFAS No. 123(R), the Company has recorded a
liability and compensation expense related to the appreciation
amount of the unit options. As of December 31, 2006, the
Company had recorded $316,826 related to the plan. This amount
is included in other accrued liabilities on the consolidated
balance sheets and selling, general, and administrative expenses
on the consolidated statement of operations.
GBENEFIT
PLANS
The Company sponsors a 401(k) plan (the Plan). To be eligible to
participate, an employee must have thirty days of continuous
employment with the Company and can join the Plan monthly. The
Plan does not require the Company to make any contributions;
however, the Company does have the option to make discretionary
matching contributions or profit sharing contributions if it
chooses. The Company contributed approximately $536,000,
$390,000 and $251,000 to the Plan during 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
HCONCENTRATIONS
OF CREDIT RISK
A substantial portion of the revenues of the Company was from a
limited number of customers in the oil and gas industry. For the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the top four
customers accounted for approximately 36%, 47% and 51% of total
revenues, respectively. As of December 31, 2006, one
customer had receivables outstanding of approximately 17% of
total accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2005, three
customers had receivables outstanding of approximately 43% of
total accounts receivable.
The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts, which
at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has
not experienced any losses in such accounts and does not believe
it is exposed to any significant risk of loss.
F-108
Integrated
Service Company, LLC (DBA InServ) and Subsidiary
Condensed
consolidated balance sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
49,016,994
|
|
Costs and estimated earnings of uncompleted contracts in excess
of billings
|
|
|
18,884,725
|
|
Cash and other current assets
|
|
|
4,090,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
71,992,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
11,681,902
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
175,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
83,849,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
19,194,066
|
|
Accrued liabilities and debt
|
|
|
11,975,199
|
|
Billings of uncompleted contracts in excess of costs and
estimated earnings
|
|
|
9,235,282
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
5,926,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
46,330,568
|
|
Members equity
|
|
|
37,518,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and members equity
|
|
$
|
83,849,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-109
Integrated
Service Company, LLC (DBA InServ) and Subsidiary
Condensed
consolidated statements of operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine
months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Contract revenues earned
|
|
$
|
253,767,477
|
|
|
$
|
134,013,136
|
|
Cost of revenues earned
|
|
|
214,839,851
|
|
|
|
111,397,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
38,927,626
|
|
|
|
22,615,866
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
16,597,789
|
|
|
|
11,399,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
22,329,837
|
|
|
|
11,216,010
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
(312,387
|
)
|
|
|
(584,154
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
22,017,450
|
|
|
$
|
10,631,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-110
Integrated
Service Company, LLC (DBA InServ) and Subsidiary
Condensed
consolidated statement of members equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine
months ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members
notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members
equity
|
|
|
receivable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006 (audited)
|
|
$
|
26,528,647
|
|
|
$
|
(1,455,440
|
)
|
|
$
|
25,073,207
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
22,017,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,017,450
|
|
Compensation expense for option agreement
|
|
|
91,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,728
|
|
Member distributions
|
|
|
(9,822,944
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,822,944
|
)
|
Payment on members note receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,697
|
|
|
|
33,697
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
125,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,840
|
|
Interest received from notes receivable
|
|
|
76,480
|
|
|
|
(76,516
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2007 (unaudited)
|
|
$
|
39,017,201
|
|
|
$
|
(1,498,259
|
)
|
|
$
|
37,518,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-111
Integrated
Service Company, LLC (DBA InServ) and Subsidiary
Condensed
consolidated statements of cash flow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine
months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
22,017,450
|
|
|
$
|
10,631,856
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activitiesDepreciation
|
|
|
958,608
|
|
|
|
873,561
|
|
Gain on disposal of equipment
|
|
|
(3,354
|
)
|
|
|
(1,140
|
)
|
Non-cash compensation expense for option agreement
|
|
|
91,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilitiesAccounts receivable
|
|
|
(20,605,877
|
)
|
|
|
(4,649,913
|
)
|
Costs and estimated earnings of uncompleted contracts in excess
of billings
|
|
|
(4,374,804
|
)
|
|
|
1,463,685
|
|
Prepaids and other assets
|
|
|
(403,168
|
)
|
|
|
(165,198
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
8,169,459
|
|
|
|
871,546
|
|
Billings of uncompleted contracts in excess of costs and
estimated earnings
|
|
|
1,707,447
|
|
|
|
3,429,052
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
7,722,398
|
|
|
|
4,004,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
(6,737,563
|
)
|
|
|
5,826,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
15,279,887
|
|
|
|
16,457,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(3,596,022
|
)
|
|
|
(1,228,925
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of equipment
|
|
|
10,102
|
|
|
|
5,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(3,585,920
|
)
|
|
|
(1,223,459
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from short-term borrowings
|
|
|
83,928,176
|
|
|
|
46,568,065
|
|
Payments of short-term borrowings
|
|
|
(78,008,022
|
)
|
|
|
(46,568,065
|
)
|
Proceeds from long-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,400,000
|
|
Payments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(5,172,167
|
)
|
|
|
(5,076,717
|
)
|
Repayment on members notes receivable
|
|
|
32,478
|
|
|
|
32,478
|
|
Purchase of member interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,799,956
|
)
|
Member tax distributions
|
|
|
(9,822,944
|
)
|
|
|
(8,350,960
|
)
|
Payments received for units
|
|
|
125,840
|
|
|
|
491,260
|
|
Interest received for members notes receivable
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
|
2,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(8,915,456
|
)
|
|
|
(10,301,742
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash
|
|
|
2,778,511
|
|
|
|
4,932,693
|
|
Cash, beginning of period
|
|
|
112,532
|
|
|
|
107,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, end of period
|
|
$
|
2,891,043
|
|
|
$
|
5,039,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-112
Notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements
(Unaudited)
Integrated Service Company, LLC (DBA InServ and formerly The
Cust-O-Fab Companies, LLC) and its wholly owned subsidiary,
Construction & Turnaround Services, LLC (collectively
the Company), are Oklahoma limited liability companies.
The Company is engaged in the chemical and refinery turnaround
business, the fabrication and field erection of process heaters,
and the maintenance and repair services of above-ground storage
tanks primarily for the chemical and petrochemical industries.
The Company provides services primarily throughout the United
States, Central America and South America.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are
unaudited and are presented in accordance with the requirements
of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
for interim reporting. Management believes that all material
adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments)
necessary for a fair presentation have been made.
These financial statements do not include all disclosures
normally made in complete annual financial statements and should
be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements of
the Company and notes thereto presented elsewhere in this
prospectus supplement. The results of operations for the nine
month period ended September 30, 2007 may not necessarily
be indicative of the results of operations for the full year
ending December 31, 2007.
|
|
3.
|
COSTS AND
ESTIMATED EARNINGS OF UNCOMPLETED CONTRACTS IN EXCESS OF
BILLINGS
|
Revenues are recognized as earned, but customers are billed in
accordance with the terms of their contract. In some instances,
customers are billed at intervals of earnings; the excess of the
amount previously billed over the revenue earned in deferred and
reported as a current liability in the consolidated financials
as billings of uncompleted contracts in excess of costs
and estimated earnings. To the extent that revenues earned
exceed the amounts billed to date (either due to processing lag
time or contractual terms), the difference is reflected as a
current asset, costs and estimated earnings of uncompleted
contracts in excess of billings in the consolidated
financial statements.
The comparison of billings to costs and estimated earnings of
uncompleted contracts at September 30, 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and estimated earnings
|
|
$
|
427,137,747
|
|
Billings
|
|
|
417,488,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,649,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The difference between billings and costs and estimated earnings
of uncompleted contracts is included in the accompanying balance
sheets under the following captions:
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and estimated earnings of uncompleted contracts in excess
of billings
|
|
$
|
18,884,725
|
|
Billings of uncompleted contracts in excess of costs and
estimated earnings
|
|
|
9,235,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,649,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-113
Notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements
|
|
4.
|
PROPERTY, PLANT
AND EQUIPMENT
|
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and
depreciated using the straight-line and accelerated methods over
the following estimated useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Land and building
|
|
$
|
6,480,557
|
|
Field equipment
|
|
|
11,499,585
|
|
Furniture, fixtures, office and computer equipment
|
|
|
1,694,467
|
|
Construction in-process
|
|
|
2,055,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,730,448
|
|
Lessaccumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(10,048,546
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
11,681,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2007, the Company repaid in full the note payable
outstanding as of December 31, 2006. The Company amended
their revolving credit and term loan agreement with Bank of
Oklahoma on March 31, 2007 and May 1, 2007. The
amended agreement includes a revolving $10,000,000 line of
credit that expires March 31, 2010, a $5,000,000 term loan
facility that expires March 31, 2013 and a $15,000,000 line
of credit that expires March 31, 2008. The outstanding
balance on the lines of credit was approximately $5,900,000 and
the Company had approximately $19,100,000 available under the
lines of credit as of September 30, 2007. The interest rate
on the Companys lines of credit is LIBOR plus the LIBOR
margin as defined in the loan agreement. The Company did not
have any borrowings against the term loan facility as of
September 30, 2007.
|
|
6.
|
USE OF ESTIMATES
IN THE PREPARATION OF THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates. Significant estimates include, but are not
limited to, the amount of revenue recognized and
managements determination of the allowance for doubtful
accounts.
On October 31, 2007, the members entered into an agreement
to sell all of the outstanding equity interests of the Company
for approximately $225,000,000. It is anticipated that the
transaction will be completed in mid-November 2007.
F-114
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
Common Stock
Willbros Group, Inc. may from time to time offer to sell shares
of common stock. Our common stock is listed on the New York
Stock Exchange and trades under the ticker symbol WG.
We may offer and sell these securities to or through one or more
underwriters, dealers and agents, or directly to purchasers, on
a continuous or delayed basis.
Investing in our securities involves certain risks, including
the risks described in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on March 14,
2007, the risk factors described under the caption Risk
Factors in any applicable prospectus supplement
and/or risk
factors, if any, set forth in our other filings with the SEC
pursuant to Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as referenced in
this prospectus under the caption Incorporation of Certain
Documents by Reference.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any other
regulatory body has approved or disapproved of these securities
or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The date of this prospectus is November 2, 2007
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
This prospectus is part of a registration statement that we
filed with the SEC utilizing a shelf registration
process. Under this shelf process, we may, from time to time,
sell the securities described in this prospectus in one or more
offerings. This prospectus provides you with a general
description of the securities we may offer. Each time we offer
to sell securities, we will provide a prospectus supplement that
will contain specific information about the terms of that
offering. The prospectus supplement may also add to, update or
change information contained in this prospectus and,
accordingly, to the extent inconsistent, the information in this
prospectus is superseded by the information in the prospectus
supplement. You should read both this prospectus and any
applicable prospectus supplement together with the additional
information described under the heading Where You Can Find
More Information before making an investment in our
securities.
You should rely only on the information contained or
incorporated by reference in this prospectus and any prospectus
supplement. We have not authorized anyone else to provide you
with different information. If anyone provides you with
different information, you should not rely on it. We are not
making an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction
where the offer or sale is not permitted. You should assume that
the information appearing in this prospectus and any prospectus
supplement, or any documents incorporated by reference therein,
is accurate only as of the date on the front cover of the
applicable document. Our business, financial condition, results
of operations and prospects may have changed since that date.
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this
prospectus to Willbros, the Company,
we, us and our refer to
Willbros Group, Inc., and its consolidated subsidiaries and
predecessors.
We are an independent international contractor serving the oil,
gas and power industries and government entities worldwide. Our
principal markets are the United States, Canada and the Middle
East. We currently operate our business in three segments:
Engineering, Construction and Engineering, Procurement and
Construction or EPC. We provide engineering,
construction, EPC and specialty services to industry and
governmental entities worldwide, specializing in pipelines and
associated facilities. We are also actively involved in asset
development, ownership and operations as an extension of our
portfolio of industry services.
Investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You
should consider carefully the risk factors identified under the
caption Risk Factors in any applicable prospectus
supplements and our most recent annual report on
Form 10-K
and in any of our other filings with the SEC under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as well as other
information in this prospectus and any prospectus supplements
and the
2
documents incorporated by reference herein or therein before
purchasing any of our securities. Each of the risk factors could
adversely affect our business, operating results and financial
condition, as well as adversely affect the value of an
investment in our securities.
CAUTIONARY
NOTICE REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus, including the documents that we incorporate by
reference, contain forward-looking statements within
the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended. All statements, other than statements of
historical facts, included or incorporated by reference in this
prospectus that address activities, events or developments which
we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future,
including such things as future capital expenditures (including
the amount and nature thereof), oil, gas, gas liquids and power
prices, demand for our services, the amount and nature of future
investments by governments, expansion and other development
trends of the oil, gas and power industries, business strategy,
expansion and growth of our business and operations, the outcome
of government investigations and legal proceedings and other
such matters are forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and analyses
we made in light of our experience and our perception of
historical trends, current conditions and expected future
developments as well as other factors we believe are appropriate
under the circumstances. However, whether actual results and
developments will conform to our expectations and predictions is
subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. As a result,
actual results could differ materially from our expectations.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those
contemplated by our forward-looking statements include, but are
not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulties we may encounter in connection with the recently
completed sale and disposition of our Nigeria assets and Nigeria
based operations, including without limitation, obtaining
indemnification for any losses we may experience if claims are
made against any corporate parent guarantees we provided and
which remained in place subsequent to the closing;
|
|
|
|
the consequences we may encounter if our settlements in
principle with the DOJ and the SEC are finalized, including the
imposition of civil or criminal fines, penalties, disgorgement
of profits, monitoring arrangements, or other sanctions that
might be imposed as a result of government investigations;
|
|
|
|
the consequences we may encounter if our settlements in
principle with the DOJ and the SEC are not finalized, including
the loss of eligibility to bid for and obtain U.S. government
contracts, and other civil and criminal sanctions which may
exceed the current amount we have estimated and reserved in
connection with the settlements in principle;
|
|
|
|
the commencement by foreign governmental authorities of
investigations into the actions of our current and former
employees, and the determination that such actions constituted
violations of foreign law;
|
|
|
|
the dishonesty of employees
and/or other
representatives or their refusal to abide by applicable laws and
our established policies and rules;
|
|
|
|
adverse weather conditions not anticipated in bids and estimates;
|
|
|
|
project cost overruns, unforeseen schedule delays, and the
application of liquidated damages;
|
|
|
|
cancellation of projects, in whole or in part;
|
|
|
|
failing to realize cost recoveries from projects completed or in
progress within a reasonable period after completion of the
relevant project;
|
|
|
|
inability to hire and retain sufficient skilled labor to execute
our current work, our work in backlog and future work we have
not yet been awarded;
|
|
|
|
inability to execute cost-reimbursable projects within the
target cost, thus eroding contract margin but not contract
income on the project;
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
curtailment of capital expenditures in the oil, gas and power
industries;
|
|
|
|
political or social circumstances impeding the progress of our
work and increasing the cost of performance;
|
|
|
|
failure to obtain the timely award of one or more projects;
|
|
|
|
inability to identify and acquire suitable acquisition targets
on reasonable terms;
|
|
|
|
inability to obtain adequate financing;
|
|
|
|
inability to obtain sufficient surety bonds or letters of credit;
|
|
|
|
loss of the services of key management personnel;
|
|
|
|
the demand for energy moderating or diminishing;
|
|
|
|
downturns in general economic, market or business conditions in
our target markets;
|
|
|
|
changes in the effective tax rate in countries where our work
will be performed;
|
|
|
|
changes in applicable laws or regulations, or changed
interpretations thereof;
|
|
|
|
changes in the scope of our expected insurance coverage;
|
|
|
|
inability to manage insurable risk at an affordable cost;
|
|
|
|
the occurrence of the risk factors listed elsewhere or
incorporated by reference in this prospectus and accompanying
prospectus supplement; and
|
|
|
|
other factors, most of which are beyond our control.
|
Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made or
incorporated by reference in this prospectus are qualified by
these cautionary statements and there can be no assurance that
the actual results or developments we anticipate will be
realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have
the consequences for, or effects on, our business or operations
that we anticipate today. Accordingly, you should not unduly
rely on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of
the date of this prospectus. We undertake no obligation to
publicly revise any forward-looking statement to reflect
circumstances or events after the date of this prospectus or to
reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. You should,
however, review the factors and risks we describe in the reports
we file from time to time with the SEC. See Where You Can
Find More Information.
4
Unless otherwise provided in a prospectus supplement, we will
use the net proceeds from the sale of the securities offered by
this prospectus and any prospectus supplement for our general
corporate purposes, which may include repayment of indebtedness,
funding possible acquisitions of additional assets and
businesses which would complement our capabilities, additions to
our working capital and capital expenditures. The prospectus
supplement relating to an offering will contain a more detailed
description of the use of proceeds of any specific offering of
securities.
5
DESCRIPTION
OF CAPITAL STOCK
General
We have 71 million authorized shares of capital stock,
consisting of (a) 70 million shares of common stock,
par value $0.05 per share; and (b) 1 million shares of
Class A preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share.
Common
Stock
As of September 30, 2007, 29,131,831 shares of our
common stock were outstanding. All of the outstanding shares of
our common stock are fully paid and non-assessable, and any
shares issued upon exercise of the warrants will be fully paid
and non-assessable. The holders of our common stock are entitled
to one vote for each share of common stock held on all matters
voted upon by stockholders, including the election of directors.
Holders of our common stock have no right to cumulate their
votes in the election of directors. Subject to the rights of any
then-outstanding shares of our preferred stock, the holders of
our common stock are entitled to receive dividends as may be
declared in the discretion of the board of directors out of
funds legally available for the payment of dividends. We are
subject to restrictions on the payment of dividends under the
provisions of our senior secured credit facility.
The holders of our common stock are entitled to share equally
and ratably in our net assets upon a liquidation or dissolution
after we pay or provide for all liabilities, subject to any
preferential liquidation rights of any preferred stock that at
the time may be outstanding. The holders of our common stock
have no preemptive, subscription, conversion or redemption
rights. There are no governmental laws or regulations in the
Republic of Panama affecting the remittance of dividends,
interest and other payments to our nonresident stockholders so
long as we continue not to engage in business in the Republic of
Panama.
Our articles of incorporation contain restrictions, subject to
the determination by the board of directors in good faith and in
its sole discretion, on the transfer of any shares of our common
stock in order to prevent us from becoming a controlled
foreign corporation under United States tax law. See
Anti-Takeover Effects of Provisions of our
Articles of Incorporation and By-laws.
Class A
Preferred Stock
As of the date of this prospectus, there were no outstanding
shares of our Class A preferred stock; however, the board
of directors has reserved for issuance pursuant to our
Stockholder Rights Plan described below 35,000 shares of
Series A junior participating preferred stock. Class A
preferred stock may be issued from time to time in one or more
series, and the board of directors, without further approval of
the stockholders, is authorized to fix the dividend rates and
terms, conversion rights, voting rights, redemption rights and
terms, liquidation preferences, sinking fund and any other
rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions applicable to
each series of Class A preferred stock.
The specific matters that the board of directors may determine
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the designation of each series;
|
|
|
|
the number of shares of each series;
|
|
|
|
the rate of any dividends;
|
|
|
|
whether any dividends will be cumulative or non-cumulative;
|
|
|
|
the terms of any redemption;
|
|
|
|
the amount payable in the event of any voluntary or involuntary
liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of our
company;
|
|
|
|
rights and terms of any conversion or exchange;
|
|
|
|
restrictions on the issuance of shares of the same series or any
other series; and
|
6
The purpose of authorizing the board of directors to determine
these rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions is to
eliminate delays associated with a stockholder vote on specific
issuances. The issuance of Class A preferred stock, while
providing flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions
and other corporate purposes, could:
|
|
|
|
|
decrease the amount of earnings and assets available for
distribution to holders of common stock;
|
|
|
|
adversely affect the rights and powers, including voting rights,
of holders of common stock; and
|
|
|
|
have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in
control.
|
For example, the board of directors, with its broad power to
establish the rights and preferences of authorized but unissued
Class A preferred stock, could issue one or more series of
Class A preferred stock entitling holders to vote
separately as a class on any proposed merger or consolidation,
to convert Class A preferred stock into a larger number of
shares of common stock or other securities, to demand redemption
at a specified price under prescribed circumstances related to a
change in control, or to exercise other rights designed to
impede a takeover.
Stockholder
Rights Plan
On April 1, 1999, our Board of Directors approved a rights
agreement with Mellon Investor Services LLC, as rights agent,
and declared a distribution of one preferred share purchase
right (Right) for each outstanding share of common
stock. Each Right, when it becomes exercisable, entitles its
registered holder to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of
Series A junior participating preferred stock
(Series A preferred stock) at a price of $30.00
per one one-thousandth of a share.
The Rights are attached to and trade with shares of our common
stock. Currently, the Rights are not exercisable and there are
no separate certificates representing the Rights. If the Rights
become exercisable, we will distribute separate Rights
certificates. Until that time and as long as the Rights are
outstanding, any transfer of shares of our common stock will
also constitute the transfer of the Rights associated with those
common shares. The Rights will expire on April 15, 2009,
unless we redeem or exchange the Rights before that date.
The Rights will become exercisable upon the earlier to occur of:
|
|
|
|
|
the public announcement that a person or group of persons has
acquired 15 percent or more of our common stock, except in
connection with an offer approved by our board of
directors; or
|
|
|
|
10 days, or a later date determined by our board of
directors, after the commencement of, or announcement of an
intention to commence, a tender or exchange offer that would
result in a person or group of persons acquiring 15 percent
or more of our common stock.
|
If any person or group of persons acquire 15 percent or
more of our common stock, except in connection with an offer
approved by our board of directors, each holder of a Right,
except the acquiring person or group, will have the right, upon
exercise of the Right, to receive that number of shares of our
common stock or Series A preferred stock having a value
equal to two times the exercise price of the Right.
In the event that any person or group acquires 15 percent
or more of our common stock and either (a) we are acquired
in a merger or other business combination in which the holders
of all of our common stock immediately prior to the transaction
are not the holders of all of the surviving corporations
voting power or (b) more than 50% of our assets or earning
power is sold or transferred, then each holder of a Right,
except the acquiring person or group, will have the right, upon
exercise of the Right, to receive common shares of the acquiring
company having a value equal to two times the exercise price of
the Right.
The Rights are redeemable in whole, but not in part, by action
of the board of directors at a price of $.005 per Right prior to
the earlier to occur of a person or group acquiring
15 percent of our common stock or the expiration of the
Rights. Following the public announcement that a person or group
has acquired 15 percent
7
of our common stock, the Rights are redeemable in whole, but not
in part, by action of the board of directors at a price of $.005
per Right, provided the redemption is in connection with a
merger or other business combination involving our company in
which all the holders of our common stock are treated alike and
which does not involve the acquiring person or its affiliates.
In the event shares of Series A preferred stock are issued
upon the exercise of the Rights, holders of the Series A
preferred stock will be entitled to receive, in preference to
holders of common stock, a quarterly dividend payment in an
amount per share equal to the greater of (a) $10.00 or
(b) 1,000 times the dividend declared per share of common
stock. The Series A preferred stock dividends are
cumulative but do not bear interest. Shares of Series A
preferred stock are not redeemable. In the event of liquidation,
the holders of the Series A preferred stock will be
entitled to a minimum preferential liquidation payment of $1,000
per share; thereafter, and after the holders of the common stock
receive a liquidation payment of $1.00 per share, the holders of
the Series A preferred stock and the holders of the common
stock will share the remaining assets in the ratio of 1,000 to 1
(as adjusted) for each share of Series A preferred stock
and common stock so held, respectively. In the event of any
merger, consolidation or other transaction in which the shares
of common stock are exchanged, each share of Series A
preferred stock will be entitled to receive 1,000 times the
amount received per share of common stock. These rights are
protected by antidilution provisions.
Each share of Series A preferred stock will have 1,000
votes, voting together with the common stock. In the event that
the amount of accrued and unpaid dividends on the Series A
preferred stock is equivalent to six full quarterly dividends or
more, the holders of the Series A preferred stock shall
have the right, voting as a class, to elect two directors in
addition to the directors elected by the holders of the common
stock until all cumulative dividends on the Series A
preferred stock have been paid through the last quarterly
dividend payment date or until non-cumulative dividends have
been paid regularly for at least one year.
The stockholder rights plan is designed to deter coercive
takeover tactics that attempt to gain control of our company
without paying all stockholders a fair price. The plan
discourages hostile takeovers by effectively allowing our
stockholders to acquire shares of our capital stock at a
discount following a hostile acquisition of a large block of our
outstanding common stock and by increasing the value of
consideration to be received by stockholders in specified
transactions following an acquisition.
Anti-Takeover
Effects of Provisions of our Articles of Incorporation and
By-Laws
Our articles of incorporation, as amended and restated, and our
restated by-laws contain provisions that might be characterized
as anti-takeover provisions. These provisions may deter or
render more difficult proposals to acquire control of our
company, including proposals a stockholder might consider to be
in his or her best interest, impede or lengthen a change in
membership of the board of directors and make removal of our
management more difficult.
Classified
Board of Directors; Removal of Directors; Advance Notice
Provisions for Stockholder Nominations
Our articles of incorporation provide for the board of directors
to be divided into three classes of directors serving staggered
three-year terms, with the numbers of directors in the three
classes to be as nearly equal as possible. Any director may be
removed from office but only for cause and only by the
affirmative vote of a majority of the then outstanding shares of
stock entitled to vote on the matter. Any stockholder wishing to
submit a nomination to the board of directors must follow the
procedures outlined in our articles of incorporation. Any
proposal to amend or repeal the provisions of our articles of
incorporation relating to the matters contained above in this
paragraph requires the affirmative vote of the holders of 75% or
more of the outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote on the
matter.
Unanimous
Consent of Stockholders Required For Action by Written
Consent
Under our restated by-laws, stockholder action may be taken
without a meeting only by unanimous written consent of all of
our stockholders.
8
Issuance
of Preferred Stock
As described above, our articles of incorporation authorize a
class of undesignated Class A preferred stock consisting of
1,000,000 shares. Class A preferred stock may be
issued from time to time in one or more series, and the board of
directors, without further approval of the stockholders, is
authorized to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and
restrictions applicable to each series of Class A preferred
stock. The purpose of authorizing the board of directors to
determine these rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions
is to eliminate delays associated with a stockholder vote on
specific issuances. The issuance of Class A preferred
stock, while providing flexibility in connection with possible
acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could, among other
things, adversely affect the voting power of the holders of our
common stock and, under certain circumstances, make it more
difficult for a third party to gain control of us.
Restrictions
on Transfer of Common Stock
Our articles of incorporation provide for restrictions on the
transfer of any shares of our common stock to prevent us from
becoming a controlled foreign corporation under
United States tax law. Any purported transfer, including a sale,
gift, assignment, devise or other disposition of common stock,
which would result in a person or persons becoming the
beneficial owner of 10% or more of the issued and outstanding
shares of our common stock, is subject to a determination by our
board of directors in good faith, in its sole discretion, that
the transfer would not in any way, directly or indirectly,
affect our status as a non-controlled foreign corporation. The
transferee or transferor to be involved in a proposed transfer
must give written notice to our Secretary not less than
30 days prior to the proposed transfer. In the event of an
attempted transfer in violation of the provisions of our
articles of incorporation relating to the matters contained in
this paragraph, the purported transferee will acquire no rights
whatsoever in the transferred shares of common stock. Nothing in
this provision, however, precludes the settlement of any
transactions entered into through the facilities of the New York
Stock Exchange. If the board of directors determines that a
transfer has taken place in violation of these restrictions, the
board of directors may take any action it deems advisable to
refuse to give effect to or to prevent the transfer, including
instituting judicial proceedings to enjoin the transfer.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock, as well
as the rights agent under our rights agreement, is Mellon
Investor Services LLC.
9
We may sell the securities from time to time as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
through agents;
|
|
|
|
to dealers or underwriters for resale;
|
|
|
|
directly to purchasers; or
|
|
|
|
through a combination of any of these methods of sale.
|
In addition, we may issue the securities as a dividend or
distribution or in a subscription rights offering to our
existing security holders. In some cases, we or dealers acting
with us or on our behalf may also purchase securities and
reoffer them to the public by one or more of the methods
described above. This prospectus may be used in connection with
any offering of our securities through any of these methods or
other methods described in the applicable prospectus supplement.
The securities we distribute by any of these methods may be sold
to the public, in one or more transactions, either:
|
|
|
|
|
at a fixed price or prices, which may be changed;
|
|
|
|
at market prices prevailing at the time of sale;
|
|
|
|
at prices related to prevailing market prices; or
|
|
|
|
at negotiated prices.
|
We may solicit offers to purchase securities directly from the
public from time to time. We may also designate agents from time
to time to solicit offers to purchase securities from the public
on our behalf. If required, the prospectus supplement relating
to any particular offering of securities will name any agents
designated to solicit offers, and will include information about
any commissions we may pay the agents, in that offering. Agents
may be deemed to be underwriters as that term is
defined in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. From time to
time, we may sell securities to one or more dealers acting as
principals. The dealers, who may be deemed to be
underwriters as that term is defined in the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, may then resell those
securities to the public.
We may sell securities from time to time to one or more
underwriters, who would purchase the securities as principal for
resale to the public, either on a firm-commitment or
best-efforts basis. If we sell securities to underwriters, we
may execute an underwriting agreement with them at the time of
sale and will name them in the applicable prospectus supplement.
In connection with those sales, underwriters may be deemed to
have received compensation from us in the form of underwriting
discounts or commissions and may also receive commissions from
purchasers of the securities for whom they may act as agents.
Underwriters may resell the securities to or through dealers,
and those dealers may receive compensation in the form of
discounts, concessions or commissions from the underwriters
and/or
commissions from purchasers for whom they may act as agents. The
applicable prospectus supplement will include any required
information about underwriting compensation we pay to
underwriters, and any discounts, concessions or commissions
underwriters allow to participating dealers, in connection with
an offering of securities.
If we offer securities in a subscription rights offering to our
existing security holders, we may enter into a standby
underwriting agreement with dealers, acting as standby
underwriters. We may pay the standby underwriters a commitment
fee for the securities they commit to purchase on a standby
basis. If we do not enter into a standby underwriting
arrangement, we may retain a dealer-manager to manage a
subscription rights offering for us.
We may authorize underwriters, dealers and agents to solicit
from third parties offers to purchase securities under contracts
providing for payment and delivery on future dates. The
applicable prospectus supplement will describe the material
terms of these contracts, including any conditions to the
purchasers
10
obligations, and will include any required information about
commissions we may pay for soliciting these contracts.
Underwriters, dealers, agents and other persons may be entitled,
under agreements that they may enter into with us, to
indemnification by us against certain liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act.
In connection with an offering, the underwriters may purchase
and sell securities in the open market. These transactions may
include short sales, stabilizing transactions and purchases to
cover positions created by short sales. Short sales involve the
sale by the underwriters of a greater number of securities than
they are required to purchase in an offering. Stabilizing
transactions consist of certain bids or purchases made for the
purpose of preventing or retarding a decline in the market price
of the securities while an offering is in progress.
The underwriters also may impose a penalty bid. This occurs when
a particular underwriter repays to the underwriters a portion of
the underwriting discount received by it because the
underwriters have repurchased securities sold by or for the
account of that underwriter in stabilizing or short-covering
transactions.
These activities by the underwriters may stabilize, maintain or
otherwise affect the market price of the securities. As a
result, the price of the securities may be higher than the price
that otherwise might exist in the open market. If these
activities are commenced, they may be discontinued by the
underwriters at any time. These transactions may be effected on
an exchange or automated quotation system, if the securities are
listed on that exchange or admitted for trading on that
automated quotation system, or in the over-the-counter market or
otherwise.
The underwriters, dealers and agents, as well as their
associates, may be customers of or lenders to, and may engage in
transactions with and perform services for us in the ordinary
course of business.
11
Unless otherwise specified in the prospectus supplement
accompanying this prospectus, Arias, Fabrega &
Fabrega, Panama City, Panama will provide opinions regarding the
validity of the common stock offered hereby.
Our consolidated financial statements as of December 31,
2006 and 2005 and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and
2005, and for each of the years in the two-year period ended
December 31, 2006, and the effects of the adjustments to
the 2004 consolidated financial statements to retrospectively
apply the change as discussed in Note 2 and the change in
reportable operating segments as described in Note 12,
incorporated by reference from our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on October 16, 2007, and our financial statement
schedule as of December 31, 2006 and for each of the years
in the two-year period then ended, incorporated by reference
from our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, have been
incorporated by reference herein and in the registration
statement in reliance upon the reports of GLO CPAs, LLP,
independent registered public accounting firm, incorporated by
reference herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts
in accounting and auditing. Our consolidated statements of
operation, stockholders equity and comprehensive income
(loss), and cash flows for the year ended December 31,
2004, before the effects of the adjustment to retrospectively
apply the change in accounting discussed in Note 2 and the
change in reportable operating segments as described in
Note 12, incorporated by reference from our Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on October 16, 2007, and our financial statement
schedule as of December 31, 2004 and for the year then
ended, incorporated by reference from our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, have been
incorporated by reference herein and in the registration
statement in reliance upon the report of KPMG LLP, independent
registered public accounting firm, incorporated by reference
herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The audited consolidated financial statements of InServ for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 included in
our Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated November 2, 2007, which is incorporated herein by
reference, have been audited by Grant Thornton LLP, independent
registered public accounting firm, as indicated in their report
with respect thereto, and are incorporated herein in reliance
upon the authority of said firm as experts in giving said
reports.
We have agreed to indemnify and hold KPMG LLP (KPMG)
harmless against and from any and all legal costs and expenses
incurred by KPMG in its successful defense of any legal action
or proceeding that arises as a result of KPMGs consent to
the incorporation by reference of its audit report on our
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004,
and the related financial statement schedule, incorporated by
reference herein and in this registration statement.
WHERE
YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements
and other information with the SEC. You can inspect and copy the
registration statement and the reports and other information we
file with the SEC at the Public Reference Room maintained by the
SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580,
Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates. You can obtain
information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by
calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC also maintains an Internet website which provides online
access to reports, proxy and information statements and other
information regarding companies that file electronically with
the SEC at the address
http://www.sec.gov.
INCORPORATION
OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE
The SEC allows us to incorporate by reference into
this prospectus the information we file with them, which means
we can disclose important business and financial information
about us to you by referring you to those documents. The
information incorporated by reference is considered to be a part
of this prospectus, except for any information that is
superseded by information included directly in this prospectus
and any prospectus supplement. We incorporate by reference the
documents listed below that we previously filed with
12
the SEC (SEC File
No. 1-11953)
and any future filings made with the SEC under
Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, prior to the completion of the
offering covered by this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
Our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006;
|
|
|
|
Our Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007
and September 30, 2007;
|
|
|
|
Our Current Reports on
Form 8-K
filed on January 8, 2007, January 16, 2007,
February 8, 2007, March 7, 2007, May 17, 2007,
May 24, 2007, May 30, 2007, June 8, 2007,
August 16, 200, August 21, 2007, September 14,
2007, October 16, 2007 and November 2, 2007;
|
|
|
|
The description of our common stock contained in our
registration statement on
Form 8-A,
dated July 19, 1996, including any amendment or report
filed before or after the date of this prospectus for the
purpose of updating the description; and
|
|
|
|
The description of our preferred stock purchase rights contained
in our registration statement on
Form 8-A,
dated April 9, 1999, including any amendment or report
filed before or after the date of this prospectus for the
purpose of updating the description.
|
These filings have not been included in or delivered with this
prospectus. We will provide to each person, including any
beneficial owner to whom this prospectus is delivered, a copy of
any or all information that has been incorporated by reference
in this prospectus but not delivered with this prospectus. You
can access these documents on our website at
http://www.willbros.com
or you may request a copy of these filings at no cost, by
writing or telephoning us at the following address:
Willbros USA, Inc.
4400 Post Oak Parkway
Suite 1000
Houston, TX 77027
Attention: Investor Relations
(713) 403-8000
Except as otherwise specifically incorporated by reference in
this prospectus, information contained in, or accessible
through, our website is not a part of this prospectus.
The reports, proxy statements and other information we file with
the SEC can also be inspected and copied at the New York Stock
Exchange, 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10002. For
more information on obtaining copies of our public filings at
the New York Stock Exchange, you should call
(212) 656-5060.
13