e424b3
Filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration No. 333-139499
Prospectus Supplement No. 11
(To Prospectus dated May 4, 2007)
4,280,714
SHARES
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
COMMON STOCK
This prospectus supplement No. 11 supplements and amends the prospectus dated May 4, 2007, as
supplemented and amended by that certain prospectus supplement No. 1 dated May 10, 2007, that
certain prospectus supplement No. 2 dated May 17, 2007, that certain prospectus supplement No. 3
dated May 24, 2007, that certain prospectus supplement No. 4 dated May 30, 2007, that certain
prospectus supplement No. 5 dated June 8, 2007, that certain prospectus supplement No. 6 dated
August 7, 2007, that certain prospectus supplement No. 7 dated August 9, 2007, that certain
prospectus supplement No. 8 dated August 16, 2007, that certain prospectus supplement No. 9 dated
August 21, 2007 and that certain prospectus supplement No. 10 dated September 14, 2007 (the
Prospectus). This prospectus supplement should be read in conjunction with the Prospectus, which
is to be delivered with this prospectus supplement.
This prospectus supplement includes the attached Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Form
10-Q) of Willbros Group, Inc. (the Company), for the three months ended September 30, 2007,
filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
November 1, 2007. The exhibits
to the Form 10-Q are not included with this prospectus supplement and are not incorporated by
reference herein.
There are significant risks associated with an investment in our securities. These risks are
described under the caption Risk Factors beginning on page 6 of the Prospectus, as the same may
be updated in prospectus supplements.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has
approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus supplement or the
accompanying Prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The date of this prospectus supplement is November 1, 2007.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-11953
Willbros Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Republic of Panama
|
|
98-0160660 |
(Jurisdiction of incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
Plaza 2000 Building
50th Street, 8th Floor
P.O. Box 0816-01098
Panama, Republic of Panama
Telephone No.: +50-7-213-0947
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of principal executive offices of registrant)
NOT APPLICABLE
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer þ Non-Accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares of the registrants Common Stock, $.05 par value, outstanding as of
October 15, 2007 was 29,131,831.
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
2
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
58,709 |
|
|
$ |
37,643 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for bad debts of
$789 and $598 |
|
|
181,733 |
|
|
|
137,104 |
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed |
|
|
29,029 |
|
|
|
11,027 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
16,322 |
|
|
|
17,299 |
|
Parts and supplies inventories |
|
|
2,773 |
|
|
|
2,069 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
4,658 |
|
|
|
294,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
293,224 |
|
|
|
499,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
7,978 |
|
|
|
6,792 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and
amortization
of $89,028 and $78,941 |
|
|
120,393 |
|
|
|
65,347 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
13,184 |
|
|
|
6,683 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
9,075 |
|
|
|
11,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
443,854 |
|
|
$ |
589,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
11,237 |
|
|
$ |
5,562 |
|
Current portion of government obligations |
|
|
8,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
134,425 |
|
|
|
122,352 |
|
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income |
|
|
7,891 |
|
|
|
14,947 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
4,671 |
|
|
|
3,556 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
4,639 |
|
|
|
182,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
170,938 |
|
|
|
328,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.75% convertible senior notes |
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
6.5% senior convertible notes |
|
|
32,050 |
|
|
|
84,500 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
26,085 |
|
|
|
7,077 |
|
Long-term portion of government obligations |
|
|
24,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liability for unrecognized tax benefits |
|
|
6,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
7,369 |
|
|
|
1,728 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
337,396 |
|
|
|
492,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingencies and commitments (Note 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A preferred stock, par value $.01 per share,
1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.05 per share, 70,000,000 shares
authorized; 29,337,338 shares issued (25,848,596 at
December 31, 2006) |
|
|
1,467 |
|
|
|
1,292 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
273,840 |
|
|
|
217,036 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(181,912 |
) |
|
|
(120,603 |
) |
Treasury stock at cost, 205,507 shares (167,844 at
December 31, 2006) |
|
|
(2,667 |
) |
|
|
(2,154 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
15,730 |
|
|
|
2,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
106,458 |
|
|
|
97,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
443,854 |
|
|
$ |
589,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
246,716 |
|
|
$ |
125,466 |
|
|
$ |
610,168 |
|
|
$ |
352,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
207,089 |
|
|
|
113,418 |
|
|
|
538,790 |
|
|
|
320,628 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,457 |
|
|
|
3,265 |
|
|
|
13,223 |
|
|
|
9,180 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
17,448 |
|
|
|
11,092 |
|
|
|
42,295 |
|
|
|
33,133 |
|
Government fines |
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,994 |
|
|
|
127,775 |
|
|
|
616,308 |
|
|
|
362,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
18,722 |
|
|
|
(2,309 |
) |
|
|
(6,140 |
) |
|
|
(10,760 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
4,433 |
|
|
|
1,350 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(2,071 |
) |
|
|
(3,046 |
) |
|
|
(6,552 |
) |
|
|
(7,482 |
) |
Other net |
|
|
(1,327 |
) |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
(2,019 |
) |
|
|
105 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,375 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,369 |
) |
|
|
(2,277 |
) |
|
|
(19,513 |
) |
|
|
(6,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes |
|
|
16,353 |
|
|
|
(4,586 |
) |
|
|
(25,653 |
) |
|
|
(16,787 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
6,081 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
7,793 |
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing
operations |
|
|
10,272 |
|
|
|
(4,965 |
) |
|
|
(33,446 |
) |
|
|
(18,598 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations
net of provision for income taxes |
|
|
(9,126 |
) |
|
|
(17,136 |
) |
|
|
(21,494 |
) |
|
|
(46,249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,146 |
|
|
$ |
(22,101 |
) |
|
$ |
(54,940 |
) |
|
$ |
(64,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.87 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.32 |
) |
|
|
(0.80 |
) |
|
|
(0.78 |
) |
|
|
(2.15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
(1.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.00 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
0.32 |
(1) |
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.87 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.26 |
) |
|
|
(0.80 |
) |
|
|
(0.78 |
) |
|
|
(2.15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(1.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.00 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
28,804,907 |
|
|
|
21,557,695 |
|
|
|
27,421,927 |
|
|
|
21,480,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
34,844,482 |
|
|
|
21,557,695 |
|
|
|
27,421,927 |
|
|
|
21,480,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 8 Income (Loss) Per Share for a reconciliation of the numerator for the
diluted income per share calculation. |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Excess of |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Comprehen- |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Par Value |
|
|
Par Value |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
sive Income |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance,
January 1, 2007 |
|
|
25,848,596 |
|
|
$ |
1,292 |
|
|
$ |
217,036 |
|
|
$ |
(120,603 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,154 |
) |
|
$ |
2,360 |
|
|
$ |
97,931 |
|
Cumulative effect of
adoption of
FIN 48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,369 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,369 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2007,
as adjusted |
|
|
25,848,596 |
|
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
217,036 |
|
|
|
(126,972 |
) |
|
|
(2,154 |
) |
|
|
2,360 |
|
|
|
91,562 |
|
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,940 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,940 |
) |
Realization of loss on
sale of Nigeria assets
and operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,773 |
(1) |
|
|
3,773 |
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,597 |
|
|
|
9,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive
loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,570 |
) |
Deferred compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,010 |
|
Restricted stock grants |
|
|
384,077 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting of restricted
stock rights |
|
|
9,583 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to treasury stock,
vesting restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(513 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(513 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
107,500 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,550 |
|
Stock issued on conversion
of 6.5% senior convertible
notes |
|
|
2,987,582 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
52,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,450 |
|
Additional costs of private
placement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31 |
)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2007 |
|
|
29,337,338 |
|
|
$ |
1,467 |
|
|
$ |
273,840 |
|
|
$ |
(181,912 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,667 |
) |
|
$ |
15,730 |
|
|
$ |
106,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Removal of previously recorded foreign currency translation adjustments associated
with the Companys Nigeria operations. |
|
(2) |
|
Private placement completed October 26, 2006. |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(54,940 |
) |
|
$ |
(64,847 |
) |
Reconciliation of net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government fines |
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
21,494 |
|
|
|
46,249 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
13,223 |
|
|
|
9,180 |
|
Amortization of debt issue costs |
|
|
1,557 |
|
|
|
1,911 |
|
Amortization of deferred compensation |
|
|
3,010 |
|
|
|
3,054 |
|
Amortization of discount on notes receivable for stock
purchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
15,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sales of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(716 |
) |
|
|
(4,563 |
) |
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
Deferred income tax provision |
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Equity in joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(753 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(36,923 |
) |
|
|
(17,630 |
) |
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed |
|
|
(15,226 |
) |
|
|
(7,344 |
) |
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
11,239 |
|
|
|
5,055 |
|
Parts and supplies inventories |
|
|
(704 |
) |
|
|
224 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(879 |
) |
|
|
(1,503 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
3,466 |
|
|
|
13,830 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
(1,446 |
) |
Long-term liability for unrecognized tax benefits |
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
|
|
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income |
|
|
(6,772 |
) |
|
|
5,604 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in operating activities of continuing operations |
|
|
(22,629 |
) |
|
|
(12,717 |
) |
Cash
provided by (used in) operating activities of discontinued
operations |
|
|
2,980 |
|
|
|
(59,585 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(19,649 |
) |
|
|
(72,302 |
) |
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of discontinued operations, net |
|
|
105,568 |
|
|
|
32,082 |
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
8,243 |
|
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(15,890 |
) |
|
|
(12,389 |
) |
Acquisition of subsidiary |
|
|
(24,154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by investing activities of
continuing operations |
|
|
66,952 |
|
|
|
26,436 |
|
Cash used in investing activities of
discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
66,952 |
|
|
|
24,245 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of 6.5% senior convertible notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,500 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(12,993 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
1,519 |
|
|
|
2,226 |
|
Repayment of notes payable |
|
|
(8,665 |
) |
|
|
(9,385 |
) |
Costs of debt issues |
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
(3,776 |
) |
Acquisition of treasury stock |
|
|
(513 |
) |
|
|
(554 |
) |
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
Payments on capital leases |
|
|
(7,507 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities of
continuing operations |
|
$ |
(28,445 |
) |
|
$ |
7,841 |
|
Cash provided by financing activities of
discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(28,445 |
) |
|
|
7,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
2,208 |
|
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) all activities |
|
|
21,066 |
|
|
|
(40,457 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
37,643 |
|
|
|
55,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
58,709 |
|
|
$ |
15,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest (including discontinued operations) |
|
$ |
5,659 |
|
|
$ |
4,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes (including discontinued operations) |
|
$ |
8,438 |
|
|
$ |
10,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
non-cash investing and financing transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid insurance obtained by note payable (including discontinued operations) |
|
$ |
10,051 |
|
|
$ |
9,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and property obtained by capital leases |
|
$ |
29,780 |
|
|
$ |
11,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement of officer note receivable for stock |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred government obligation payments (including discontinued operations) |
|
$ |
32,300 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
Willbros Group, Inc., a Republic of Panama corporation, and all of its majority-owned
subsidiaries (the Company or WGI) provide
construction; engineering; and engineering,
procurement and construction (EPC) services to the energy industry and government entities. The
Companys principal markets for continuing operations are the United States, Canada, and Oman. The
Company obtains its work through competitive bidding and through negotiations with prospective
clients. Contract values may range from several thousand dollars to several hundred million dollars
and contract durations range from a few weeks to more than two years.
The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2006, which has been
derived from audited consolidated financial statements, and the preceding unaudited interim
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of September 30, 2007, have been prepared pursuant
to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly,
certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant
to those rules and regulations. However, the Company believes the presentations and disclosures
herein are adequate to make the information not misleading. These unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys December 31, 2006 audited
Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto contained in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
In the opinion of management, the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
reflect all adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly
the financial position as of September 30, 2007, the results of operations and cash flows of the
Company for all interim periods presented, and stockholders equity for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. The results of operations and cash flows for the nine months ended September
30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results and cash flows to be achieved for
the full year.
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include certain estimates and assumptions by
management. These estimates and assumptions relate to the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the date of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts
of revenue and expense during the periods. Significant items subject to such estimates and
assumptions include the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment, goodwill and parts and
supplies inventories; quantification of amounts recorded for contingencies, tax accruals and
certain other accrued liabilities; valuation allowances for accounts receivable and deferred income
tax assets; and revenue recognition under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting
including estimates of progress toward completion and estimates of gross profit or loss accrual on
contracts in progress. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and other
assumptions that it believes relevant under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
As discussed in Note 4 Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition
Services Agreement, the Company sold its TXP-4 Plant on January 12, 2006, its Venezuelan operations
and assets on August 17 and November 28, 2006, and its assets and operations in Nigeria on February
7, 2007. Accordingly, these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect these operations as
discontinued operations in all periods presented. The disclosures in the Notes to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements relate to continuing operations except as otherwise indicated.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to be consistent with current
presentation.
Cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2007 includes $10,000 of
cash required as a minimum balance as stipulated by the Companys 2006 Credit Facility. See Note 7
Long-term Debt.
Inventories, consisting of parts and supplies, are stated at the lower of cost or market.
Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Parts and supplies inventories
are evaluated at least annually and adjusted for excess quantities and obsolete items.
8
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
2. New Accounting Pronouncements
SFAS No. 157
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157
clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants
would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that
prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. SFAS No. 157 is effective for the
Companys fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating what impact,
if any, this statement will have on its consolidated financial statements.
SFAS No. 159
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159
permits entities to choose to measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair
value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are
reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
The Company is currently evaluating what impact, if any, this statement will have on its
consolidated financial statements.
FIN 48
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109 (FIN 48). The Company adopted FIN 48 on
January 1, 2007. FIN 48 establishes a single model to address accounting for uncertain tax
positions. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition
threshold that a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial
statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on deregulation, measurement classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.
The Company, or one of its subsidiaries, files income tax returns in the U.S. federal
jurisdiction, and various state and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no
longer subject to U.S. income tax examination by tax authorities for years before 2003 and no longer subject to
Canadian income tax for years before 2001 or in Oman for years before 2005.
As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized a $6,369 increase in the
liability for unrecognized tax benefits, which was accounted for as an increase to the January 1,
2007 accumulated deficit. During the third quarter of 2007, the Company received new documentation
and support regarding existing uncertain tax positions and adjusted the FIN 48 liability
accordingly. Management has identified additional uncertain tax positions based on information not
previously available. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax
benefits is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of adopting FIN 48 at January 1, 2007 |
|
$ |
6,369 |
|
Income tax liabilities recognized prior to adoption of FIN 48 |
|
|
158 |
|
Change in measurement of existing tax positions |
|
|
(1,931 |
) |
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year |
|
|
110 |
|
Newly identified tax positions |
|
|
1,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
6,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in
income tax expense. The Company has recognized interest and penalties in its cumulative adjustment
to the beginning accumulated deficit in the amount of $568. During the nine months ended September
30, 2007, the Company has recognized $18 in interest expense. Interest expense was significantly
reduced during the third quarter of 2007 as a result of the change in measurement of existing
tax positions primarily related to prior years and previously recognized in retained
earnings upon the adoption of FIN 48. Interest and penalties are included in the table above.
9
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
3. Acquisitions
Effective July 1, 2007, the Company acquired the assets and operations of Midwest Management
(1987) Ltd. (Midwest) pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement. Midwest provides pipeline
construction, rehabilitation and maintenance, water crossing installations or replacements, and
facilities fabrication to the oil and gas industry, predominantly in western Canada.
The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting prescribed by
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141). The
excess of the purchase price over assets acquired and liabilities assumed was allocated to
goodwill, which is not deductible for income tax purposes. A summary of the initial purchase price allocation as of September 30, 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
7,610 |
|
Property,
plant and equipment |
|
|
18,258 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
5,734 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(3,692 |
) |
Deferred income tax liability |
|
|
(3,756 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
24,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
The total purchase price amount was $24,154, consisting of $22,793 in purchase price and
approximately $1,361 in transaction costs. The final purchase price is subject to the finalization
of a working capital adjustment.
4.
Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition
Services Agreement
Strategic Decisions
In 2006, the Company announced that it intended to sell the TXP-4 Plant, and its assets and
operations in Venezuela and Nigeria, which led to their classification as discontinued operations
(Discontinued Operations). The net assets and net liabilities related to the Discontinued
Operations are shown on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as Assets of discontinued
operations and Liabilities of discontinued operations, respectively. The results of the
Discontinued Operations are shown on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as Loss
from discontinued operations, net of provision for income taxes for all periods presented.
Nigeria
Assets and Nigeria Based Operations
Share Purchase Agreement
On
February 7, 2007, the Company sold its Nigeria assets and
Nigeria based operations in West Africa to Ascot Offshore
Nigeria Limited (Ascot), a Nigerian oilfield services company, for total consideration of $155,250
(the Purchase Price). The sale was pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement by and between the
Company and Ascot dated as of February 7, 2007 (the Agreement), providing for the purchase by
Ascot of all of the share capital of WG Nigeria Holdings Limited (WGNHL), the holding company for
Willbros West Africa, Inc., Willbros (Nigeria) Limited, Willbros (Offshore) Nigeria Limited and WG
Nigeria Equipment Limited.
In connection with the sale of its Nigeria assets and operations, the Company and its
subsidiary Willbros International, Inc. (WII) entered into an indemnity agreement with Ascot and
Berkeley Group plc (Berkeley) (the Indemnity Agreement), pursuant to which Ascot and Berkeley will indemnify the
Company and WII for any obligations incurred by the Company or WII in connection with the parent
company performance guarantees (the Guarantees) that the Company and WII previously issued and
maintained on behalf of certain former subsidiaries now owned by Ascot under certain working
contracts between the subsidiaries and their customers. Either the Company, WII or both are
contractually obligated, in varying degrees, under the Guarantees to perform or cause to be performed work related to
several ongoing projects. Among the Guarantees covered by the Indemnity Agreement are
five contracts under which the Company estimates that, at February 7, 2007, there was aggregate
remaining contract revenue, excluding any additional claim revenue, of $352,107 and aggregate
estimated cost to complete of $293,562. At the February 7, 2007 sale date, one of the contracts
covered by the Guarantees was estimated to be in a loss position with an accrual for such loss of
$33,157. The associated liability was included in the liabilities acquired by Ascot. No claims have
been made against the Guarantees.
10
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
4. Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement (continued)
Global Settlement Agreement (GSA)
On September 7, 2007, the Company finalized the GSA with Ascot. The significant components of
the agreement include:
|
|
|
A reduction to the purchase price of $25,000; |
|
|
|
|
Ascot agreed to provide supplemental backstop letters of credit in the amount of $20,322
issued by a non-Nigerian bank approved by the Company; |
|
|
|
|
Ascot provided specific indemnities related to two ongoing projects that Ascot
acquired as part of the Agreement; |
|
|
|
|
Ascot and the Company agreed that all working capital adjustments as provided for
in the Agreement were resolved; and |
|
|
|
|
Except as provided in the GSA, Ascot and the Company waived all of their respective rights and obligations
relating to indemnifications provided in the February 7, 2007 Share Purchase Agreement
concerning any breach of a covenant or any representation or warranty. |
As a result of the GSA, the Company has recognized a cumulative gain on the sale of its
Nigeria assets and operations of $183. The GSA was settled by a payment to Ascot from the Company
in the amount of $11,076. This amount represents the agreed upon reduction to the purchase price,
due to Ascot, of $25,000, reduced by amounts owed by Ascot to the Company of $11,299 for services
rendered under the Transition Services Agreement (TSA) and $2,625 due from Ascot in the form of a
note from the closing of the Agreement. Because of the GSA, Ascots account with the Company was
current as of September 30, 2007.
Letters of Credit
At September 30, 2007, the Company had four letters of credit outstanding totaling $20,322
associated with Discontinued Operations (the Discontinued
LCs). At the time of the February 7, 2007, sale of
the Nigeria assets and operations, in accordance with FASB
Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Guarantees of
Indebtedness of Others (FIN 45), a liability
was recognized for $1,575 related to the letters of credit. This liability will be released as
each of the Discontinued LCs are released or expire and the Company is relieved of its risk related
to the Discontinued LCs. The Discontinued LCs are scheduled to expire in the amount of $440 on
December 19, 2007, $19,759 on August 31, 2008, and $123 on February 28, 2009.
In accordance with the Agreement, the Discontinued LCs are backstopped by U.S. dollar
denominated letters of credit issued by Intercontinental Bank Plc, a Nigerian bank. Additionally,
in accordance with the GSA, the Discontinued LCs are
supplementally backstopped by letters of credit issued by an
international bank based in Paris, France, with a Standard and Poors rating of AA+/Stable as of
October 25, 2007. These backstop letters of credit provide loss security to the Company in the event
any of the Companys outstanding Discontinued LCs are called.
Transition Services Agreement
Concurrent with the Nigeria sale, the Company entered into a two-year TSA with Ascot. Under
the agreement, the Company is primarily providing labor in the form of seconded employees to work
under the direction of Ascot along with specifically defined work orders for services generally
covered in the TSA. Ascot has agreed to reimburse the Company for these services. Through
September 30, 2007, these reimbursable contract costs totaled approximately $21,582. The after-tax
residual net loss from providing these transition services is $370, or less than 2% of the incurred
costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Both the Company and Ascot are working to
shift the transition services provided by the Company to direct services secured by Ascot.
Although the services provided under the TSA generate transactions between the Company and
Ascot, the amounts are not considered to be significant.
Additionally, the Companys level of support
has decreased over the term of the TSA to date, as the employees and services provided by the
Company shift to direct employees and services secured by Ascot. The Company does not have the
ability to significantly influence the operating or financial policies of Ascot. Under the
provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 03-13, Applying the Conditions of Paragraph 42 of
FASB Statement No. 144 in Determining Whether to Report Discontinued Operations (EITF 03-13),
the Company has no significant continuing involvement in the operations of the former assets and
operations owned in Nigeria. Accordingly, income generated by the TSA is shown, net of costs
incurred, as a component of Loss from discontinued operations, net of provision for income taxes
on the Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations, and its assets and liabilities are shown as Assets of
discontinued operations and Liabilities of discontinued operations, respectively, in the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
11
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
4. Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement (continued)
Residual Equipment in Nigeria
In
conjunction with the TSA, the Company has made available certain equipment to Ascot for use
in Nigeria; this equipment was not sold to Ascot under the Agreement.
Through September 30, 2007,
the Company has not resolved the rental rates for this equipment with Ascot for the period February
8, 2007 through September 30, 2007. As agreed in the GSA, on September 14, 2007, the Company
received an appraisal for this equipment; the fair-value of the equipment was $8,477. The
Companys net book value for this equipment at
September 30, 2007 was $2,377. This equipment is
comprised of construction equipment, rolling stock, and generator sets. The Company and Ascot are
working to resolve the issue of rental equipment, either through cash settlement or though an
exchange of equipment.
Venezuela
Business Disposal
On November 28, 2006, the Company completed the sale of its assets and operations in
Venezuela. The Company received total compensation of $7,000 in cash and $3,300 in the form of a
commitment from the buyer, to be paid on or before December 4, 2013. The repayment commitment is
secured by a 10% interest in a Venezuelan financing joint venture. As of September 30, 2007, no
payment on the commitment has been made. The Company estimates no gain or loss on the sale of its
assets and operations in Venezuela.
TXP-4 Plant
Asset Disposal
On January 12, 2006, the Company completed the sale of its TXP-4 Plant. The Company received
cash payments of $27,944 for the sale and realized a gain of $1,342, net of taxes of $691.
In addition to the cash payments described above, Williams Field Services Company (Williams)
agreed to pay the Company a portion of any recovery that Williams may obtain based on damages, loss
or injury related to the TXP-4 Plant up to $3,400. This settlement is contingent upon Williams
recovery from various third parties and is the only ongoing potential source of cash flows
subsequent to the sale date. The timing and amount of any resolution to these claims cannot be
estimated. No additional payments have been received.
12
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
4. Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement (continued)
Results of Discontinued Operations
Condensed Statements of Operations of the Discontinued Operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
Nigeria |
|
|
Nigeria TSA |
|
|
Venezuela |
|
|
Opal TXP-4 |
|
|
Operations |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,825 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,825 |
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,690 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
Profit disgorgement |
|
|
10,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,300 |
|
|
|
4,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(10,300 |
) |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,467 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
1,441 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(8,859 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,972 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(8,859 |
) |
|
$ |
(267 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(9,126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
Nigeria |
|
|
Nigeria TSA |
|
|
Venezuela |
|
|
Opal TXP-4 |
|
|
Operations |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
102,304 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
102,347 |
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
112,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,546 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
7,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(17,312 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,429 |
) |
Other income (expense) |
|
|
3,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(13,834 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,952 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
3,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(17,018 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(118 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(17,136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
4. Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
Nigeria |
|
|
Nigeria TSA |
|
|
Venezuela |
|
|
Opal TXP-4 |
|
|
Operations |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
30,046 |
|
|
$ |
21,906 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
51,952 |
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
34,360 |
|
|
|
20,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,887 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
3,472 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,037 |
|
Profit disgorgement |
|
|
10,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,132 |
|
|
|
21,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(18,086 |
) |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,762 |
) |
Other income (expense) |
|
|
(1,946 |
) |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,891 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(20,032 |
) |
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,653 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(21,124 |
) |
|
$ |
(370 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(21,494 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
Nigeria |
|
|
Nigeria TSA |
|
|
Venezuela |
|
|
Opal TXP-4 |
|
|
Operations |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
375,275 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
375,532 |
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
372,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373,049 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
20,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(21,158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,005 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,163 |
) |
Other income (expense) |
|
|
(11,022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
2,033 |
|
|
|
(8,825 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(32,180 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(841 |
) |
|
|
2,033 |
|
|
|
(30,988 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
14,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
15,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(46,607 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(984 |
) |
|
$ |
1,342 |
|
|
$ |
(46,249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
4. Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement (continued)
Financial Position of Discontinued Operations
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Discontinued Operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
Nigeria |
|
|
Nigeria TSA |
|
|
Venezuela |
|
|
Opal TXP-4 |
|
|
Operations |
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,602 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,797 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,228 |
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,658 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets of discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
Nigeria |
|
|
Nigeria TSA |
|
|
Venezuela |
|
|
Opal TXP-4 |
|
|
Operations |
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
12,964 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,964 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
36,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,683 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
76,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,673 |
|
Contract cost and recognized income not
yet billed |
|
|
79,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,364 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
16,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,017 |
|
Parts and supplies inventories |
|
|
21,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
243,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,346 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
50,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,723 |
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
294,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,192 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
148,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,135 |
|
Loss provision on contracts |
|
|
33,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
182,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets of discontinued operations |
|
$ |
112,100 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
112,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
4. Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement (continued)
Profit Disgorgement
Subsequent to September 30, 2007, the Company reached an agreement in principle with the staff
of the SEC to resolve the investigation of possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
and the U.S. securities laws related to projects in Bolivia, Ecuador and Nigeria. As a
result of this agreement in principle, subject to approval by the SEC commissioners, the Company
has recorded a $10,300 charge to discontinued operations. The $10,300 is profit disgorgement,
inclusive of accrued interest on the disgorged profit, related to a single Nigeria project included
in the February 7, 2007 sale of the Companys Nigeria assets and operations. The disgorged profit
was previously recognized in the results from discontinued operations, and accordingly, the full
amount of $10,300 is recorded as a charge to discontinued operations in the third quarter of 2007.
This classification is consistent with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No.
144). See Note 13 Contingencies, Commitments and Other
Circumstances for further discussion of the agreement in
principle.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Nigeria had restricted cash of $36,683 on December 31, 2006. The December 31, 2006 balance was
in a consortium bank account that required the approval of the Company and its consortium partner
to disburse funds. Additionally, cash and cash equivalents for Nigeria contained $9,482 at
December 31, 2006, that was appropriated for use by specific projects.
Parts and Supplies Inventories
Nigeria had parts and supplies inventories of $21,645, net of reserves of $12,159, at December
31, 2006.
Loss Provision on Contracts
The Company had recognized $33,957 of estimated losses related to two projects in Nigeria as
of December 31, 2006.
Contingencies, Commitments and Other Circumstances
At December 31, 2006, other assets and accounts receivable of the Discontinued
Operations include anticipated recoveries from insurance or third parties of $1,191, primarily
related to the repair of pipelines.
5. Contracts in Progress
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed on uncompleted contracts arise when
revenues have been recorded, but the amounts cannot be billed under the terms of the contracts.
Such amounts are recoverable from customers upon various measures of performance, including
achievement of certain milestones, completion of specified units or completion of the contract.
Also included in contract cost and recognized income not yet billed on uncompleted contracts are
amounts the Company seeks to collect from customers for change orders approved in scope, but not
for price associated with that scope change (unapproved change orders). Revenue for these amounts
are recorded equal to cost incurred when realization of price approval is probable and the
estimated amount is equal to or greater than the Companys cost related to the unapproved change
order. Unapproved change orders involve the use of estimates, and it is reasonably possible that
revisions to the estimated recoverable amounts of recorded unapproved change orders may be made in
the near-term. If the Company does not successfully resolve these matters, a net expense (recorded
as a reduction in revenues), may be required, in addition to amounts that have been previously
recorded.
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed, and contract billings in excess of cost
and recognized income, as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed |
|
$ |
29,029 |
|
|
$ |
11,027 |
|
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income |
|
|
(7,891 |
) |
|
|
(14,947 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,138 |
|
|
$ |
(3,920 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
5. Contracts in Progress (continued)
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed includes $3,245 and $1,191 at September 30,
2007, and December 31, 2006, respectively, on completed contracts. Included in the $3,245 unbilled
at September 30, 2007, is a $1,736 change order related to one project that has been invoiced and
collected subsequent to quarter end.
6. Government Obligations
Government
obligations represent amounts to become due to government entities,
specifically the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the
SEC, as final settlement of the investigations involving
possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the FCPA) and possible violations of
the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These investigations stem
primarily from the Companys former operations in Bolivia,
Ecuador and Nigeria. In October 2007, the Company reached agreements in principle, subject to approval by the DOJ and the SEC,
to settle their investigations. The agreements in
principle provide for an anticipated aggregate payment of $32,300 consisting of $22,000 in fines
payable to the DOJ related to FCPA violations and $10,300 of profit disgorgement payable to the
SEC.
As
a result of the agreements in principle, the Company has increased
its accrual related to
these investigations by $8,300. This increase is recorded in the third quarter of 2007 and is
comprised of: 1) a $2,000 reduction in the Companys
second quarter of 2007 estimate of $24,000 in fines
resulting from the DOJ actions that was recorded as a charge to continuing operations, and 2) an
additional $10,300 of profit disgorgement, inclusive of accrued interest on the disgorged profit,
resulting from SEC actions. The profit disgorgement is related
to a single Nigeria project included
in the February 7, 2007 sale of the Companys Nigeria assets and operations. The disgorged profit
was previously recognized in the results from discontinued operations, and accordingly, the full
amount of $10,300 is recorded as a charge to discontinued operations in the third quarter of 2007.
The aggregate obligation of $32,300 has been classified on the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets as $8,075 in Current portion of government obligations and the remaining $24,225 in
Long-term portion of government obligations. This division is based on payment terms in the
agreements in principle that provide for four equal installments,
first on signing of the final
settlements and annually for approximately three years thereafter.
The agreements in principle are contingent upon the parties agreement to the terms of a final
settlement agreement, and approval by the DOJ and SEC and
confirmation by a federal district court. There can be no assurance that the
settlement will be finalized. See Note 13 Contingencies,
Commitments and Other Circumstances for further discussion
of the agreements in principle.
7. Long-term Debt
Long-term debt as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2.75% convertible senior notes |
|
$ |
70,000 |
|
|
$ |
70,000 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
34,797 |
|
|
|
11,601 |
|
6.5% senior convertible notes |
|
|
32,050 |
|
|
|
84,500 |
|
Other obligations |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
2006 Credit Facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
136,960 |
|
|
|
166,152 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
(8,825 |
) |
|
|
(4,575 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
128,135 |
|
|
$ |
161,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Credit Facility
On October 27, 2006, Willbros USA, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered
into a new $100,000 three-year senior secured synthetic credit facility (the 2006 Credit
Facility) with a group of lenders led by Calyon New York Branch (Calyon). The 2006 Credit
Facility replaced the Companys 2004 Credit Facility. The Company may elect to increase the total
capacity under the 2006 Credit Facility to $150,000, with Calyons consent. Through December 31,
2007, the Company has received a commitment from Calyon to increase the capacity under the 2006
Credit Facility to $125,000 subject to certain terms and conditions.
17
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
7. Long-term Debt (continued)
The 2006 Credit Facility may be used for standby and commercial letters of credit, borrowings
or a combination thereof. Borrowings, which may be made up to $25,000 less the amount of any letter
of credit advances or financial letters of credit, must be repaid at least once a year and no new
revolving advances may be made for a period of 10 consecutive business days thereafter.
Fees payable under the 2006 Credit Facility include a facility fee at a rate per annum equal
to 5.0 percent of the 2006 Credit Facility capacity, payable quarterly in arrears (the facility fee
will be reduced to 2.75 percent if the Company obtains a rating from S&P and Moodys greater than B
and B2, respectively), and a letter of credit fee
equal to 0.125 percent per annum of aggregate commitments. Interest on any borrowings is payable
quarterly in arrears at the adjusted base rate minus 1.00 percent or at a Eurodollar rate at the
Companys option. The 2006 Credit Facility is collateralized by substantially all of the Companys
assets, including stock of the Companys principal subsidiaries. The Company may not make any
acquisitions involving cash consideration in excess of $5,000 in any 12-month period, and $10,000
in the aggregate, without the approval of a majority of the lenders under the 2006 Credit Facility.
The 2006 Credit Facility contains a requirement for the maintenance of a $10,000 minimum cash
balance, prohibits the payment of cash dividends and includes customary affirmative and negative
covenants, such as limitations on the creation of certain new indebtedness and liens, restrictions
on certain transactions and payments, maintenance of a maximum senior leverage ratio, a minimum
fixed charge coverage ratio, and minimum tangible net worth requirement. A default may be triggered
by events such as a failure to comply with financial covenants or other covenants, a failure to
make payments when due, a failure to make payments when due in respect of or a failure to perform
obligations relating to debt obligations in excess of $5,000, a change of control of the Company or
certain insolvency proceedings as defined by the 2006 Credit Facility. The 2006 Credit Facility is
guaranteed by the Company and certain other subsidiaries. Unamortized costs associated with the
creation of the 2006 Credit Facility total $1,463 and $1,986 and are included in other assets at
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. Because the 2006 Credit Facility has only
been used to provide letters of credit, these costs are being amortized to general and
administrative expense over the three-year term of the credit facility ending October 2009.
On May 9, 2007, the Company received consent under the 2006 Credit Facility for the cash
acquisition of Midwest. This consent stipulates that the cash consideration should not exceed
$C18,500, plus actual working capital, working capital adjustment and reasonable fees and expenses
incurred in connection with the acquisition of Midwest.
On May 16, 2007, the Company entered into an amendment to allow for cash payments not to
exceed $21,000 during the term of the 2006 Credit Facility with respect to fractional shares or as
a part of a separately negotiated inducement to the holders of the 6.5% Senior Convertible Notes
and 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes.
As of September 30, 2007, there were no borrowings outstanding under the 2006 Credit Facility
and there were $80,168 in outstanding letters of credit, consisting of $59,846 issued for projects
in continuing operations and $20,322 issued for projects related to Discontinued Operations. As of
December 31, 2006, there were no borrowings outstanding under the 2006 Credit Facility and there
were $64,545 in outstanding letters of credit, consisting of $41,920 issued for projects in
continuing operations and $22,625 issued for projects related to
Discontinued Operations. The Company is currently prohibited from
borrowing under the 2006 Credit Facility due to debt incurrence
restrictions in the 6.5% Notes.
The 2006 Credit Facility includes customary affirmative and negative covenants, such as
limitations on the creation of new indebtedness and on certain liens, restrictions on certain
transactions and maintenance of the following financial covenants:
|
|
|
A consolidated tangible net worth in an amount of not less than the sum of $116,561 plus
50 percent of consolidated net income earned in each quarter ended after December
31, 2006; |
|
|
|
|
A maximum senior leverage ratio of 1.00 to 1.00 for the quarter ending September
30, 2007, and for each quarter thereafter; |
|
|
|
|
A fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 3.00 to 1.00, for the quarter
ended September 30, 2007, and for each quarter
thereafter; and |
|
|
|
|
A prohibition on capital expenditures (cost of assets added through purchase or capital
lease) if the Companys liquidity falls below $50,000. |
18
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
7. Long-term Debt (continued)
If these covenants are violated, it would be considered an event of default entitling the
lenders to terminate the remaining commitment, call all outstanding letters of credit, and
accelerate any principal and interest outstanding. As of September 30, 2007;
|
|
|
The Companys consolidated tangible net worth was $151,934, which was approximately
$35,373 in excess of the tangible net worth the Company was required to maintain under the credit
facility; |
|
|
|
|
The Company is in compliance with the maximum senior leverage
ratio because it has
incurred no revolving advance or other senior debt; |
|
|
|
|
The Companys fixed charge coverage ratio was 6.17 to
1.00; and |
|
|
|
|
The Companys cash balance as of September 30, 2007 was $58,709, which allowed the
Company to add $53,926 of fixed assets to the balance sheet during the previous 12 months. |
At September 30, 2007, the Company was in compliance with all of these covenants.
6.5% Senior Convertible Notes
On December 22, 2005, the Company entered into a purchase agreement (the Purchase Agreement)
for a private placement of $65,000 aggregate principal amount of its 6.5% Senior Convertible Notes
due 2012 (the 6.5% Notes). The private placement closed on December 23, 2005. During the first
quarter of 2006, the initial purchasers of the 6.5% Notes exercised their options to purchase an
additional $19,500 aggregate principal amount of the 6.5% Notes. Collectively, the primary
offering and the purchase option of the 6.5% Notes total $84,500. The net proceeds of the offering
were used to retire existing indebtedness and provide additional liquidity to support working
capital needs.
The 6.5% Notes are governed by an indenture, dated December 23, 2005, that was entered into by
and among the Company, as issuer, Willbros USA, Inc., as guarantor (WUSAI), and The Bank of New
York Mellon Corporation, as Trustee (the Indenture), and were issued under the Purchase Agreement
by and among the Company and the initial purchasers of the 6.5% Notes (the Purchasers), in a
transaction exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the Securities Act). The 6.5% Notes are convertible into shares of the Companys stock and these
underlying shares have been registered with the SEC. The 6.5% Notes, however, have not been
registered with the SEC.
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company and WUSAI have agreed to indemnify the
Purchasers, their affiliates and agents, against certain liabilities, including liabilities under
the Securities Act. The 6.5% Notes are convertible into shares of the Companys common stock at a
conversion rate of 56.9606 shares of common stock per $1,000.00 principal amount of notes
(representing a conversion price of approximately $17.56 per share resulting in 1,825,589 shares at
September 30, 2007), subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. The 6.5% Notes are general
senior unsecured obligations. Interest is due semi-annually on June 15 and December 15, and began
on June 15, 2006.
The 6.5% Notes mature on December 15, 2012 unless the notes are repurchased or converted
earlier. The Company does not have the right to redeem the 6.5% Notes. The holders of the 6.5%
Notes have the right to require the Company to purchase the 6.5% Notes for cash, including unpaid
interest, on December 15, 2010. The holders of the 6.5% Notes also have the right to require the
Company to purchase the 6.5% Notes for cash upon the occurrence of a fundamental change, as defined
in the Indenture. In addition to the amounts described above, the Company will be required to pay a
make-whole premium to the holders of the 6.5% Notes who elect to convert their notes into the
Companys common stock in connection with a fundamental change. The make-whole premium is payable
in additional shares of common stock and is calculated based on a formula with the premium ranging
from 0 percent to 28.0 percent depending on when the fundamental change occurs and the price of the
Companys stock at the time the fundamental change occurs.
Upon conversion of the 6.5% Notes, the Company has the right to deliver, in lieu of shares of
its common stock, cash or a combination of cash and shares of its common stock. Under the
Indenture, the Company is required to notify holders of the 6.5% Notes of its method for settling
the principal amount of the 6.5% Notes upon conversion. This notification, once provided, is
irrevocable and legally binding upon the Company with regard to any conversion of the 6.5% Notes.
On March 21, 2006, the Company notified holders of the 6.5% Notes of its election to satisfy its
conversion obligation with respect to the principal amount of any 6.5% Notes surrendered for
conversion by paying the holders of such surrendered 6.5% Notes 100 percent of the principal
conversion obligation in the form of common stock of the Company. Until the 6.5% Notes are surrendered for
conversion, the Company will not be required to notify holders of its method for settling the
excess amount of the conversion obligation relating to the amount of the conversion value above the
principal amount, if any. In the event of a default of $10,000 or more on any credit agreement,
including the 2006 Credit Facility and the 2.75% Notes, a corresponding event of default would
result under the 6.5% Notes.
19
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
7. Long-term Debt (continued)
On May 18, 2007, the Company completed two transactions to induce conversion with two
Purchasers of the 6.5% Notes. Under the conversion agreements, the Purchasers converted $36,250 in
aggregate principal amount of the 6.5% Notes into 2,064,821 shares of the Companys $0.05 par value
common stock. As an inducement for the Purchasers to convert, the Company made aggregate cash
payments to the Purchasers of $8,972, plus $1,001 in accrued interest for the current interest
period. In connection with the induced conversion, the Company recorded a loss on early
extinguishment of debt of $10,894. The loss on early extinguishment of debt is inclusive of the
cash premium paid to induce conversion and $1,922 of unamortized debt costs.
On May 29 and May 30, 2007, the Company completed two additional transactions to induce
conversion with two Purchasers of the 6.5% Notes. Under the conversion agreements, the Purchasers
converted $16,200 in aggregate principal amount of the 6.5% Notes into 922,761 shares of the
Companys common stock. As an inducement for the Purchasers to convert, the Company made aggregate
cash payments to the Purchasers of
$3,748, plus $480 in accrued interest for the current interest period. In connection with the
induced conversion, the Company recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $4,481. The loss
on early extinguishment of debt is inclusive of the cash premium paid to induce conversion and the
write-off of $733 of unamortized debt issue costs.
As of September 30, 2007, $32,050 of aggregate principal amount of the 6.5% Notes remains
outstanding. Unamortized debt issuance costs of $1,361 and $4,103 associated with the 6.5% Notes
are included in other assets at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively,
and are being amortized over the seven-year period ending December 2012.
A covenant in the indenture for the 6.5% Notes prohibits the Company from incurring any
additional indebtedness if its consolidated leverage ratio exceeds 4.00 to 1.00. As of September
30, 2007, this covenant precluded the Company from borrowing under the 2006 Credit Facility.
Capital leases are not considered indebtedness under this provision
except to the extent by which they exceed $50,000.
2.75% Convertible Senior Notes
On March 12, 2004, the Company completed a primary offering of $60,000 of 2.75% Convertible
Senior Notes (the 2.75% Notes). On April 13, 2004, the initial purchasers of the 2.75% Notes
exercised their option to purchase an additional $10,000 aggregate principal amount of the notes.
Collectively, the primary offering and purchase option of the 2.75% Notes totaled $70,000. The
2.75% Notes are general senior unsecured obligations. Interest is paid semi-annually on March 15
and September 15 and payments began on September 15, 2004. The 2.75% Notes mature on March 15, 2024
unless the notes are repurchased, redeemed or converted earlier. The Company may redeem the 2.75%
Notes for cash on or after March 15, 2011, at 100 percent of the principal amount of the notes plus
accrued interest. The holders of the 2.75% Notes have the right to require the Company to purchase
the 2.75% Notes, including unpaid interest, on March 15, 2011, 2014, and 2019, or upon a change of
control related event. On March 15, 2011, or upon a change in control event, the Company must pay
the purchase price in cash. On March 15, 2014 and 2019, the Company has the option of providing its
common stock in lieu of cash or a combination of common stock and cash to fund purchases. The
holders of the 2.75% Notes may, under certain circumstances, convert the notes into shares of the
Companys common stock at an initial conversion ratio of 51.3611 shares of common stock per
$1,000.00 principal amount of notes (representing a conversion price of approximately $19.47 per
share resulting in 3,595,277 shares at September 30, 2007 subject to adjustment in certain
circumstances). The notes will be convertible only upon the occurrence of certain specified events
including, but not limited to, if, at certain times, the closing sale price of the Companys common
stock exceeds 120 percent of the then current conversion price, or $23.36 per share, based on the
initial conversion price. In the event of a default under any Company credit agreement other than
the indenture covering the 2.75% Notes, (1) in which the Company fails to pay principal or interest
on indebtedness with an aggregate principal balance of $10,000 or more; or (2) in which
indebtedness with a principal balance of $10,000 or more is accelerated, an event of default would
result under the 2.75% Notes.
20
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
7. Long-term Debt (continued)
On June 10, 2005, the Company received a letter from a law firm representing an investor
claiming to be the owner of in excess of 25 percent of the 2.75% Notes asserting that, as a result
of the Companys failure to timely file with the SEC its 2004 Form 10-K and its Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, it was placing the Company on notice of an event of
default under the indenture dated as of March 12, 2004 between the Company, as issuer, and JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A., as trustee (the Indenture), which governs the 2.75% Notes. The Company
indicated that it did not believe that it had failed to perform its obligations under the relevant
provisions of the Indenture referenced in the letter. On August 19, 2005, the Company entered into
a settlement agreement with the beneficial owner of the 2.75% Notes on behalf of whom the notice of
default was sent, pursuant to which the Company agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to
solicit the requisite vote to approve an amendment to the Indenture (the Indenture Amendment).
The Company obtained the requisite vote and on September 22, 2005, the Indenture Amendment became
effective.
The Indenture Amendment extended the initial date on or after which the 2.75% Notes may be
redeemed by the Company to March 15, 2013 from March 15, 2011. In addition, a new provision was
added to the Indenture which requires the Company, in the event of a fundamental change which is
a change of control event in which 10 percent or more of the consideration in the transaction
consists of cash, to make a coupon make-whole payment equal to the present value (discounted at the
U.S. treasury rate) of the lesser of (a) two years of scheduled payments of interest on the 2.75%
Notes or (b) all scheduled interest on the 2.75% Notes from the date of the transaction through
March 15, 2013.
On August 15, 2007, the Company notified holders of the 2.75% Notes of its election to satisfy
its conversion obligation with respect to the principal amount of any 2.75% Notes surrendered for
conversion by
paying the holders of such surrendered 2.75% Notes 100 percent of the principal conversion
obligation in the form of common stock of the Company. Until the 2.75% Notes are surrendered for
conversion, the Company will not be required to notify holders of its method for settling the
excess amount of the conversion obligation relating to the amount of the conversion value above the
principal amount, if any.
Unamortized debt issue costs of $1,787 and $2,175 associated with the 2.75% Notes are included
in other assets at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, and are being
amortized over the seven-year period ending March 2011.
2004 Credit Facility
On March 12, 2004, the existing $125,000 June 2002 credit agreement with Calyon was amended,
restated and increased to $150,000 (the 2004 Credit Facility). The 2004 Credit Facility would
have matured on March 12, 2007 but was replaced on October 27, 2006 by the 2006 Credit Facility
(See 2006 Credit Facility above). The 2004 Credit Facility was available for standby and
commercial letters of credit, borrowings or a combination thereof. Borrowings were limited to the
lesser of 40 percent of the borrowing base or $30,000. Interest was payable quarterly at a base
rate plus a margin ranging from 0.75 percent to 2.00 percent or on a Eurodollar rate plus a margin
ranging from 1.75 percent to 3.00 percent. The 2004 Credit Facility was collateralized by
substantially all of the Companys assets, including stock of the Companys principal subsidiaries,
prohibited the payment of cash dividends and required the Company to maintain certain financial
ratios. The borrowing base was calculated using varying percentages of cash, accounts receivable,
accrued revenue, contract cost and recognized income not yet billed, property, plant and equipment,
and spare parts.
During the period from August 6, 2004 to August 18, 2006, the Company entered into various
amendments and waivers to the 2004 Credit Facility with its syndicated bank group to waive
non-compliance with certain financial and non-financial covenants. Among other things, the
amendments provided that (1) certain financial covenants and reporting obligations were waived
and/or modified to reflect the Companys current and anticipated future operating performance,
(2) the ultimate reduction of the facility to $50,000 with a letter of credit limit of $50,000 less
the face amount of letters of credit issued prior to August 18, 2006, and required that each new
letter of credit must be fully cash collateralized and that a letter of credit fee of 0.25 percent
be paid for each cash collateralized letter of credit and (3) the Company maintain a minimum cash
balance of $15,000. The Sixth Amendment expired on September 30, 2006, and availability under the
2004 Credit Facility was reduced to zero. On October 27, 2006, the 2004 Credit Facility was
replaced with the 2006 Credit Facility.
21
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
7. Long-term Debt (continued)
Capital Leases
During 2006 and 2007 the Company entered into multiple capital lease agreements to acquire
construction equipment. These leases in aggregate added approximately $34,725, net, to the
Companys total capital lease obligation. In aggregate, these leases have interest rates ranging
from 6.80% to 8.95% and have typical terms of at least 36 months.
Assets held under capital leases at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are summarized
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Construction equipment |
|
$ |
40,681 |
|
|
$ |
10,662 |
|
Land and buildings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,446 |
|
Furniture and office equipment |
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets held under capital lease |
|
|
41,216 |
|
|
|
12,643 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(6,743 |
) |
|
|
(1,572 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets under capital lease |
|
$ |
34,473 |
|
|
$ |
11,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is based on the weighted
average number of shares outstanding during each period and the assumed exercise of potential
dilutive stock options and warrants and vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock rights
less the number of treasury shares assumed to be purchased from the proceeds using the average
market price of the Companys stock for each of the periods presented. The Companys convertible
notes were included in the calculation of diluted income per share under the if-converted method.
Additionally, diluted income per share for continuing operations is calculated excluding the
after-tax interest expense associated with the convertible notes since these notes are treated as
if converted into common stock.
22
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
8. Income (Loss) Per Share (continued)
Basic and diluted income (loss) from continuing operations per common share for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 are computed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
10,272 |
|
|
$ |
(4,965 |
) |
|
$ |
(33,446 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,598 |
) |
Add: Interest and debt issuance costs associated
with convertible notes |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
applicable to common shares |
|
$ |
11,052 |
|
|
$ |
(4,965 |
) |
|
$ |
(33,446 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding for basic income (loss) per
share |
|
|
28,804,907 |
|
|
|
21,557,695 |
|
|
|
27,421,927 |
|
|
|
21,480,730 |
|
Weighted average number of dilutive potential
common shares outstanding |
|
|
6,039,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding for diluted income (loss) per
share |
|
|
34,844,482 |
|
|
|
21,557,695 |
|
|
|
27,421,927 |
|
|
|
21,480,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per common share from continuing
operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.87 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.87 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company incurred net losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, and the three and
nine months ended 2006 and has therefore excluded the securities listed below from the computation
of diluted loss per share, as the effect would be anti-dilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
2.75% Convertible senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,595,277 |
|
|
|
3,595,277 |
|
|
|
3,595,277 |
|
6.5% Senior convertible notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,813,171 |
|
|
|
1,825,589 |
|
|
|
4,813,171 |
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
833,900 |
|
|
|
686,750 |
|
|
|
833,900 |
|
Warrants to purchase common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
558,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock and restricted stock rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,000 |
|
|
|
612,637 |
|
|
|
248,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,490,348 |
|
|
|
7,278,607 |
|
|
|
9,490,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 04-8, The Effect of Contingently
Convertible Instruments on Diluted Earnings per Share, the 5,420,866 shares issuable upon
conversion of both the 6.5% Notes and the 2.75% Notes will be included in diluted earnings per
share if those securities are dilutive, regardless of whether the conversion prices of $19.47 and
$17.56, respectively, have been met.
23
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
9. Segment Information
The Companys segments are strategic business units that are managed separately as each has
different operational requirements and strategies. Beginning the first quarter of 2007, the Company
defines its operating segments based on the Companys core lines of business rather than geographic
markets as presented in prior periods. The Companys operating segments are defined as the
following reportable segments: Construction, Engineering, and Engineering, Procurement and
Construction (EPC). The three reportable segments operate primarily in the United States,
Canada, and the Middle East. Previously, the Companys reportable segments were U.S. & Canada and
International. Prior period balances have been reclassified to reflect this change. Management
evaluates the performance of each operating segment based on operating margin. The Companys
corporate operations include the general, administrative, and financing functions of the
organization. The costs of these functions are allocated between the three operating segments. The
Company has chosen not to allocate Government fines to the segments. The Companys corporate
operations also include various other assets, some of which are allocated between the three
operating segments. There are no material inter-segment revenues in the periods presented.
The following tables reflect the Companys reconciliation of segment operating results to the
net income (loss) in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006:
For the three months ended September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Engineering |
|
|
EPC |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
193,984 |
|
|
$ |
25,584 |
|
|
$ |
27,148 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
246,716 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
163,404 |
|
|
|
19,034 |
|
|
|
24,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,089 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,996 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,457 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
12,216 |
|
|
|
3,349 |
|
|
|
1,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,448 |
|
Government fines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,616 |
|
|
|
22,553 |
|
|
|
26,825 |
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
227,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income: |
|
$ |
13,368 |
|
|
$ |
3,031 |
|
|
$ |
323 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
|
18,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income
(expense), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,369 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,272 |
|
Net loss from discontinued operations, net of provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Engineering |
|
|
EPC |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
91,204 |
|
|
$ |
20,216 |
|
|
$ |
14,046 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
125,466 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
82,912 |
|
|
|
17,292 |
|
|
|
13,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,418 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,325 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,265 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
8,549 |
|
|
|
2,144 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,786 |
|
|
|
19,666 |
|
|
|
14,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss): |
|
$ |
(2,582 |
) |
|
$ |
550 |
|
|
$ |
(277 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(2,309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income
(expense), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,277 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,965 |
) |
Net loss from discontinued operations, net of provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(22,101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
9. Segment Information (continued)
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Engineering |
|
|
EPC |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
476,638 |
|
|
$ |
66,040 |
|
|
$ |
67,490 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
610,168 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
427,966 |
|
|
|
49,166 |
|
|
|
61,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
538,790 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
11,629 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,223 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
31,083 |
|
|
|
7,063 |
|
|
|
4,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,295 |
|
Government fines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
470,678 |
|
|
|
56,740 |
|
|
|
66,890 |
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
616,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss): |
|
$ |
5,960 |
|
|
$ |
9,300 |
|
|
$ |
600 |
|
|
$ |
(22,000 |
) |
|
|
(6,140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income
(expense), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,513 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,446 |
) |
Net loss from discontinued operations, net of provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,494 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(54,940 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Engineering |
|
|
EPC |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
257,587 |
|
|
$ |
55,621 |
|
|
$ |
38,973 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
352,181 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
238,172 |
|
|
|
46,598 |
|
|
|
35,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320,628 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
6,450 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
2,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,180 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
25,460 |
|
|
|
6,390 |
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270,082 |
|
|
|
53,660 |
|
|
|
39,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss): |
|
$ |
(12,495 |
) |
|
$ |
1,961 |
|
|
$ |
(226 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(10,760 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income
(expense), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,027 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,598 |
) |
Net loss from discontinued operations, net of provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(64,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets by segment as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Construction |
|
$ |
326,025 |
|
|
$ |
198,528 |
|
Engineering |
|
|
27,525 |
|
|
|
15,342 |
|
EPC |
|
|
7,881 |
|
|
|
13,336 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
77,765 |
|
|
|
68,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets |
|
$ |
439,196 |
|
|
$ |
295,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
10. Stockholders Equity
The information contained in this note pertains to continuing and discontinued operations.
Stock Ownership Plans
During May 1996, the Company established the Willbros Group, Inc. 1996 Stock Plan (the 1996
Plan) with 1,125,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance to provide for awards to key
employees of the Company, and the Willbros Group, Inc. Director Stock Plan (the Director Plan)
with 125,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance to provide for the grant of stock
options to non-employee directors. The number of shares authorized for issuance under the 1996
Plan and the Director Plan was increased to 4,075,000 and 225,000, respectively, by stockholder
approval. The Director Plan expired August 16, 2006. In 2006, the Company established the 2006
Director Restricted Stock Plan (the 2006 Director Plan)
with 50,000 shares authorized for
issuance to grant shares of restricted stock and restricted stock
rights to non-employee directors.
Restricted stock and restricted stock rights, also described collectively as restricted stock
units (RSUs), and options granted under the 1996 Plan vest generally over a three to four year
period. Options granted under the Director Plan are fully vested. Restricted stock and restricted
stock rights granted under the 2006 Director Plan vest one year after the date of grant. At
September 30, 2007, the 1996 Plan had 424,379 shares and the 2006 Director Plan had 34,419 shares
available for grant. Of the shares available at September 30, 2007, 225,000 shares in the 1996
Stock Plan are reserved for future grants required under employment agreements. Certain provisions
allow for accelerated vesting based on increases of share prices and on eligible retirement.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, $35 and $381 of compensation expense was
recognized due to accelerated vesting of RSUs due to retirements and separation from the Company.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share Based Payment (SFAS 123R) using the
modified prospective application method. Under this method, compensation cost recognized in the
three and six months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, includes the applicable amounts of: (a)
compensation expense of all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of,
January 1, 2006 (based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original
provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation), and (b) compensation cost
for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006 (based on the grant-date fair
value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R). The Company uses the
Black-Scholes valuation method to determine the fair value of stock options granted as of the grant
date.
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for awards granted under the incentive plans
following the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion
25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations, as permitted by SFAS
No. 123. Because it is the Companys policy to grant stock options at the market price on the date
of grant, the intrinsic value of these grants was zero and, therefore, no compensation expense was
recorded.
Share-based compensation related to RSUs is recorded based on the Companys stock price as of
the grant date. Recognition of share-based compensation related to RSUs was not impacted by the
adoption of SFAS No. 123R. Expense from both stock options and RSUs totaled $3,010 and $3,054,
respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 and $1,088 and $1,186,
respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.
26
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
10. Stockholders Equity (continued)
The fair values of options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006,
were estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Weighted average grant date fair value |
|
$ |
9.69 |
|
|
$ |
6.72 |
|
Weighted average assumptions used: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
40.13 |
% |
|
|
45.66 |
% |
Expected lives |
|
|
3.51 |
yrs |
|
|
3.46 |
yrs |
Risk-free interest rates |
|
|
4.42 |
% |
|
|
4.66 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Volatility is calculated using an analysis of historical volatility over the expected life of
the option. The Company believes that the historical volatility of the Companys stock is the best
method for estimating future volatility. The expected lives of options are determined based on the
Companys historical share option exercise experience. The Company believes the historical
experience method is the best estimate of future exercise patterns currently available. The
risk-free interest rates are determined using the implied yield currently available for zero-coupon
U.S. government issues, with a remaining term equal to the expected life of the options.
Stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2007 |
|
|
806,750 |
|
|
$ |
13.46 |
|
Granted |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
27.80 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
107,500 |
|
|
|
14.40 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
8.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2007 |
|
|
686,750 |
|
|
$ |
13.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2007 |
|
|
512,583 |
|
|
$ |
12.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007, the aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding and stock
options exercisable was $13,946 and $11,162, respectively. The weighted average remaining
contractual term of outstanding options is 4.70 years and the weighted average remaining
contractual term of the exercisable options is 5.73 years at September 30, 2007. The total
intrinsic value of options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was
$1,491 and $2,174, respectively.
The total fair value of options vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
2006 was $229 and $184, respectively, and $88 and $158 during the three months ended September 30,
2007 and 2006, respectively.
27
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
10. Stockholders Equity (continued)
The Companys non-vested options at September 30, 2007 and the changes in non-vested options
during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Nonvested, January 1, 2007 |
|
|
202,500 |
|
|
$ |
6.40 |
|
Granted |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
9.69 |
|
Vested |
|
|
38,333 |
|
|
|
5.97 |
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, September 30, 2007 |
|
|
174,167 |
|
|
$ |
6.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys RSU activity and related information for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
|
RSUs |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2007 |
|
|
300,116 |
|
|
$ |
17.85 |
|
Granted |
|
|
430,985 |
|
|
|
21.70 |
|
Vested |
|
|
105,586 |
|
|
|
17.57 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
12,878 |
|
|
|
20.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding September 30, 2007 |
|
|
612,637 |
|
|
$ |
20.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The RSUs outstanding at September 30, 2007 exclude 225,000 RSUs having a weighted average
grant-date fair value of $21.27, which are vested but have a deferred share issuance date. The
total fair value of RSUs vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was
$1,855 and $3,174, respectively.
As of September 30, 2007, there was a total of $10,006 of unrecognized compensation cost, net
of estimated forfeitures, related to all non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted
under the Companys stock ownership plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 2.1 years.
Warrants to Purchase Common Stock
On October 27, 2006, the Company completed a private placement of equity to certain accredited
investors pursuant to which the Company issued and sold 3,722,360 shares of the Companys common
stock resulting in net proceeds of $48,748. In conjunction with the private placement, the Company
also issued warrants to purchase an additional 558,354 shares of the Companys common stock. Each
warrant is exercisable, in whole or in part, until 60 months from the date of issuance. A warrant
holder may elect to exercise the warrant by delivery of payment to the Company at the exercise
price of $19.03 per share, or pursuant to a cashless exercise as provided in the warrant agreement.
The fair value of the warrants was $3,423 on the date of the grant, as calculated using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. At September 30, 2007, all warrants to purchase common stock
remained outstanding.
28
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
10. Stockholders Equity (continued)
Induced Conversion of 6.5% Notes
During the second quarter of 2007, the Company induced conversion and entered into conversion
agreements with four purchasers of the 6.5% Notes. The purchasers converted an amount of $52,450 of
aggregate principal that resulted in the issuance of 2,987,582 shares of the Companys common
stock.
11. Income Taxes
For interim financial reporting, the Company records the tax provision based on actual current
financial results for the period. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007,
the Company recorded an income tax provision of $6,081 and $7,793, respectively, on income before
income taxes from continuing operations for the three months ended of $16,353 and losses for the
nine months ended of $25,653. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, the
Company recorded an income tax provision of $379 and $1,811, respectively, on losses before income
taxes from continuing operations of $4,586 and $16,787. During the three months ended
September 30, 2007, the Company recognized increased income tax expense due to improved financial
performance in
the U.S. The circumstances that gave rise to the Company recording tax provisions while
incurring losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, were primarily due to
taxable income being generated in certain tax jurisdictions, and the Company having incurred
non-deductible expenses and expenses in Panama, where the Company is domiciled, which receive no
tax benefit.
12. Foreign Exchange Risk
The Company attempts to negotiate contracts that provide for payment in U.S. dollars, but it
may be required to take all or a portion of payment under a contract in another currency. To
mitigate non-U.S. currency exchange risk, the Company seeks to match anticipated non-U.S. currency
revenue with expenses in the same currency whenever possible. To the extent it is unable to match
non-U.S. currency revenue with expenses in the same currency, the Company may use forward
contracts, options or other common hedging techniques in the same non-U.S. currencies. The Company
had no derivative financial instruments to hedge currency risk at September 30, 2007 or December
31, 2006.
13. Contingencies, Commitments and Other Circumstances
Resolution
of criminal and regulatory matters
The
Company and its subsidiary, WII, have reached an agreement in principle with representatives of the
DOJ, subject to approval by the DOJ, to settle its previously disclosed investigation into possible
violations of the FCPA. In addition, the Company has reached an agreement in principle with the staff of
the SEC to resolve its previously disclosed investigation of possible violations of the FCPA and
possible violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These
investigations stem primarily from the Companys former
operations in Bolivia, Ecuador and Nigeria. As described more fully
below, if accepted by the DOJ and the SEC and approved by the court,
the settlements together will require us to pay over approximately
three years, a total of $32.3 million in penalties and
disgorgement, plus post-judgment interest on $7.725 million of
that amount. In addition, WGI and WII will, for a period of
approximately three years, each be subject to Deferred Prosecution
Agreements (DPAs) with the DOJ. Finally, we will be
subject to a permanent injunction barring future violations of
certain provisions of the federal securities laws.
The terms of the agreement in principle with the DOJ include the following:
|
|
|
A twelve-count criminal information will be filed against WGI and WII as part of the
execution of the DPAs between the DOJ and each of WGI and
WII. The twelve counts include substantive violations of the anti-bribery provisions of the
FCPA, and violations of the FCPAs books-and-records provisions.
All twelve counts relate to
operations in Nigeria, Ecuador and Bolivia during the period from
1996 to 2005. |
|
|
|
|
Provided that WGI and WII fully comply with the DPAs for a
period of approximately three years, the DOJ will agree not to
continue the criminal prosecution and, at the conclusion of that
time, will move to dismiss the criminal information. |
|
|
|
|
The DPAs will require, for each of their three year terms,
among other things, full cooperation with the
government; compliance with all federal criminal law, including but not limited to the
FCPA; and a three year monitor for WGI and its subsidiary companies, primarily focused on
international operations outside of North America, the costs of which are payable by WGI. |
|
|
|
|
The Company will be subject to $22,000 in fines related to FCPA violations. The fines are
payable in four equal installments of $5,500, first on signing, and
annually for approximately three
years thereafter, with no interest payable on the unpaid amounts. |
29
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
13. Contingencies, Commitments and Other Circumstances (continued)
With respect to the agreement in principle with the staff of the SEC:
|
|
|
The Company will consent to the filing in federal district court of a complaint by the SEC (the
Complaint), without admitting or denying the allegations in the Complaint, and to the
imposition by the court of a final
judgment of permanent injunction against us. The Complaint will allege civil violations of
the antifraud provisions of the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange Act, the FCPAs
anti-bribery provisions, and the reporting, books and records and internal controls
provisions of the Securities Exchange Act. The final judgment will not take effect until it
is confirmed by the court, and will permanently enjoin us from future violations of those
provisions. |
|
|
|
|
The final judgment will order the Company to pay $10,300, consisting of $8,900 for disgorgement
of profits and approximately $1,400 of pre-judgment interest. The disgorgement and
pre-judgment interest is payable in four equal installments of $2,575, first on signing,
and annually for approximately three years thereafter. Post-judgment interest will be payable on the
outstanding balance. |
Failure
by the Company to comply with the terms and conditions of either
settlement could result in resumed prosecution and other
regulatory sanctions.
The agreements in principle are contingent upon the parties agreement to the terms of final
settlement agreements, approval by the DOJ and the SEC and confirmation by a federal district
court. There can be no assurance that the settlements will be finalized.
As a result of the agreements
in principle, we have increased the accrual related to these
investigations by $8,300, bringing the aggregate reserves for those
matters to $32,300. An $8,300
net liability increase is recorded in the third quarter of 2007 and is comprised of: 1) a $2,000
reduction in the Companys second quarter of 2007 estimate of
$24,000 ($0.07 per basic share and $0.06 per diluted share for the
three months ended September 30, 2007, and $0.07 per basic and
diluted share for the nine months ended September 30, 2007) in fines resulting from the DOJ
actions that was recorded as a charge to continuing operations, and 2) an additional $10,300 of
profit disgorgement, ($0.36 per basic share and $0.29 per diluted share for the
three months ended September 30, 2007, and $0.38 per basic and
diluted share for the nine months ended September 30, 2007) inclusive of accrued interest on the disgorged profit, resulting from SEC
actions. The profit disgorgement is related to a single Nigeria project included in the February 7,
2007 sale of the Companys Nigeria assets and operations. The disgorged profit was previously
recognized in the results from discontinued operations, and accordingly, the full amount of $10,300
is recorded as a charge to discontinued operations in the third quarter of 2007. The aggregate
reserves reflect our estimate of the expected probable loss with
respect to these matters. If the proposed settlements are not
finalized the amount reserved may not reflect eventual losses.
If final agreements with
the DOJ and the SEC are not approved, the
Companys liquidity position and financial results could be
materially adversely affected by any additional settlement amount. For a further discussion of the risks associated with the
settlements in principle with the SEC, DOJ and OFAC, see Part II. Other Information, Item 1A. Risk
Factors; specifically, the risk factor entitled, We have reached agreements in principle to settle
investigations involving possible violations of the FCPA and possible violations of the Securities
Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
In addition, the Company previously disclosed that the United States Department of Treasurys
Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) was investigating allegations of violations of the
Sudanese Sanctions Regulations occurring during October 2003. The Company voluntarily reported this
matter to OFAC and also has reported to OFAC corrective measures and improvements to the Companys
OFAC compliance program. OFAC and Willbros USA, Inc. have agreed in principle to settle the
allegations pursuant to which the Company will pay a total of $6.6 as a civil penalty.
Class-action Lawsuit
On May 18, 2005, a securities class-action lawsuit, captioned Legion Partners, LLP v. Willbros
Group, Inc. et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Texas against the Company and certain of its present and former officers and directors. Thereafter,
three nearly identical lawsuits were filed. Plaintiffs purported to represent a class composed of
all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired Willbros Group, Inc. common stock and/or other
securities between May 6, 2002 and May 16, 2005, inclusive. The complaint sought unspecified
monetary damages and other relief. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on March 9,
2006, and briefing on that motion was completed on June 14, 2006. While the motion to dismiss was
pending, the Company reached a settlement in principle with the Lead Plaintiff and the parties
signed a Memorandum of Understanding (Settlement). The Settlement provides for a payment of
$10,500 to resolve all claims against all defendants. On February 15, 2007, the U.S. District Court
for the Southern District of Texas issued an Order approving the Settlement. The Order dismissed
with prejudice all claims against all defendants.
30
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
13. Contingencies, Commitments and Other Circumstances (continued)
Other Circumstances
Operations outside the United States may be subject to certain risks, which ordinarily would
not be expected to exist in the United States, including foreign currency restrictions, extreme
exchange rate fluctuations, expropriation of assets, civil uprisings and riots, war, unanticipated
taxes including income taxes, excise duties, import taxes, export taxes, sales taxes or other
governmental assessments, availability of suitable personnel and equipment, termination of existing
contracts and leases, government instability and legal systems of decrees,
laws, regulations, interpretations and court decisions which are not always fully developed and
which may be retroactively applied. Management is not presently aware of any events of the type
described in the countries in which it operates that would have a material effect on the financial
statements, and have not been provided for in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements.
Based upon the advice of local advisors in the various work countries concerning the
interpretation of the laws, practices and customs of the countries in which it operates, management
believes the Company follows the current practices in those countries; however, because of the
nature of these potential risks, there can be no assurance that the Company may not be adversely
affected by them in the future. The Company insures substantially all of its equipment in countries
outside the United States against certain political risks and terrorism through political risk
insurance coverage that contains a 20 percent co-insurance provision.
The Company has the usual liability of contractors for the completion of contracts and the
warranty of its work. Where work is performed through a joint venture, the Company also has
possible liability for the contract completion and warranty responsibilities of its joint venture
partners. In addition, the Company acts as prime contractor on a majority of the projects it
undertakes and is normally responsible for the performance of the entire project, including
subcontract work. Management is not aware of any material exposure related thereto which has not
been provided for in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Certain post-contract completion audits and reviews are periodically conducted by clients
and/or government entities. While there can be no assurance that claims will not be received
as a result of such audits and reviews, management does not believe a legitimate basis exists for
any material claims. At present, it is not possible for management to estimate the likelihood of
such claims being asserted or, if asserted, the amount or nature or ultimate disposition thereof.
Commitments
From time to time, the Company enters into commercial commitments, usually in the form of
commercial and standby letters of credit, surety bonds and financial guarantees. Contracts with the
Companys customers may require the Company to provide letters of credit or surety bonds with
regard to the Companys performance of contracted services. In such cases, the commitments can be
called upon in the event of failure to perform contracted services. Likewise, contracts may allow
the Company to issue letters of credit or surety bonds in lieu of contract retention provisions, in
which the client withholds a percentage of the contract value until project completion or
expiration of a warranty period. Retention commitments can be called upon in the event of warranty
or project completion issues, as prescribed in the contracts. At September 30, 2007, the Company
had approximately $64,192 of letters of credit related to continuing operations and $20,322 of
letters of credit related to Discontinued Operations in Nigeria. Additionally, the Company had
$203,917 of surety bonds outstanding related to continuing operations. These amounts represent the
maximum amount of future payments the Company could be required to make. As of September 30, 2007,
no other liability has been recognized for letters of credit and
surety bonds, other than $1,575 recorded as the fair value of the
letters of credit outstanding for the Nigeria operations. See
Note 4 Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and
Transition Services Agreement for further discussion of these letters
of credit.
31
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
13. Contingencies, Commitments and Other Circumstances (continued)
In connection with the private placement of the 6.5% Notes on December 23, 2005, the Company
entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with the Purchasers. The Registration Rights Agreement
required the Company to file a registration statement with respect to the resale of the shares of
the Companys common stock issuable upon conversion of the 6.5% Notes no later than June 30, 2006
and to use its best efforts to cause such registration statement to be declared effective no later
than December 31, 2006. The Company is also required to keep the registration statement effective
after December 31, 2006. In the event, the Company is unable to satisfy its obligations under the
Registration Rights Agreement, the Company will owe additional
interest to the holders of the 6.5% Notes at a rate per annum equal to 0.5 per cent of the principal amount of the 6.5% Notes
for the first 90 days and 1.0 percent per annum from and after the 91st day following
such event. The additional penalty interest, if incurred, is payable in conjunction with the
scheduled semi-annual interest payments on June 15 and December 15 as set forth in the Registration
Rights Agreement. The Company filed the registration statement on June 30, 2006 and it was declared
effective on January 18, 2007 by the SEC. The Company paid an additional $22 of penalty interest to
the holders of the 6.5% Notes as a result of the registration having been declared effective after
December 31, 2006.
In addition, on March 14, 2007, in connection with the filing of the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, the Company suspended the use of the
registration statement. On March 30, 2007, the Company filed a post-effective amendment to the
registration statement to incorporate by reference the 2006 Form 10-K. The post-effective amendment
was declared effective on May 4, 2007.
In connection with the private placement of common stock and warrants on October 27, 2006, the
Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with the buyers (the 2006 Registration Rights
Agreement). The 2006 Registration Rights Agreement requires the Company to file a registration
statement with respect to the resale of the common stock, including the common stock underlying the
warrants, no later than 60 days after the closing of the private placement, and to use its
reasonable best efforts to cause the registration statement to be declared effective no later than
120 days after the closing of the private placement. In the event of a delay in the filing or
effectiveness of the registration statement, or for any period during which the effectiveness of
the registration statement is not maintained or is suspended by the Company other than as permitted
under the 2006 Registration Rights Agreement, the Company will be required to pay each buyer
monthly an amount in cash equal to 1.25 percent of such buyers aggregate purchase price of its
common stock and warrants, but the Company shall not be required to pay any buyer an aggregate
amount that exceeds 10 percent of such buyers aggregate purchase price.
On March 14, 2007, in connection with the filing of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, the Company suspended the use of the registration
statement. On March 30, 2007, the Company filed a post-effective amendment to the registration
statement to incorporate by reference the 2006 Form 10-K. The post-effective amendment was declared
effective on May 4, 2007. The Company was required to make registration delay payments equal to
1.25 percent of the purchase price for the shares and warrants sold in the private placement. The
first such payment was owed as of April 3, 2007 and paid as of April 30, 2007. Thereafter, the
penalty continued to accrue based on 1.25 percent of the purchase price beginning on April 3, 2007,
the day after the date on which a 20-day grace period expired, and for each 30-day period
thereafter (prorated for any partial 30-day period) and ending on the effective date of the
post-effective amendment. The Company paid $997 of registration delay payments subsequent to
March 31, 2007 for the period in which the use of the registration statement was suspended until
the suspension was lifted on May 4, 2007.
In addition to the matters discussed above, the Company is party to a number of other legal
proceedings. Management believes that the nature and number of these proceedings are typical for a
firm of similar size engaged in a similar type of business and that none of these proceedings is
material to the Companys financial position. See Note 4 Discontinuance of Operations, Asset
Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement for discussion of commitments and contingencies
associated with Discontinued Operations.
32
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
14. Parent, Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements
The 6.5% Notes are convertible into shares of the Companys stock and these underlying shares
have been registered with the SEC. The 6.5% Notes however have not been registered with the SEC.
The 6.5% Notes are guaranteed by a subsidiary of the Company, Willbros USA, Inc. (WUSAI). There
are currently no restrictions on the ability of WUSAI to transfer funds to WGI in the form of cash
dividends or advances. Under the terms of the Indenture for the 6.5% Notes, WUSAI may not sell or
otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of its assets, or merge with or into another entity,
other than the Company, unless no default exists under the Indenture and the acquirer assumes all
obligations of WUSAI under the Indenture. WGI is a holding company with no significant operations,
other than through its subsidiaries.
Separate financial statements for the guarantor subsidiary (WUSAI) are not provided as the
Company complies with the exception to Rule 3-10(a)(1) of Regulation S-X, set forth in
sub-paragraph (e) of such rule, since the subsidiary guarantor
is 100 percent owned by the parent issuer,
the guarantee is full and unconditional, and no other subsidiary of the parent guarantees the securities. This footnote contains condensed
consolidated financial statements with separate columns for the
parent company (the Parent), the
subsidiary guarantor (WUSAI), the non-guarantor subsidiaries of the parent, consolidating
adjustments, and the total consolidated amounts.
The Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements present investments in subsidiaries using the
equity method of accounting.
33
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
14. Parent, Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements (continued)
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006
Willbros Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
(Guarantor) |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
37,029 |
|
|
$ |
1,178 |
|
|
$ |
20,502 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
58,709 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
83,709 |
|
|
|
97,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181,733 |
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet
billed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,599 |
|
|
|
3,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,029 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
15,744 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,322 |
|
Parts and supplies inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
2,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,773 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,294 |
|
|
|
(636 |
) |
|
|
4,658 |
|
Receivables from affiliated companies |
|
|
243,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(243,318 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
280,421 |
|
|
|
126,765 |
|
|
|
129,992 |
|
|
|
(243,954 |
) |
|
|
293,224 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,892 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,978 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,522 |
|
|
|
63,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,393 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
(40,171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
3,007 |
|
|
|
9,878 |
|
|
|
9,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
243,257 |
|
|
$ |
201,057 |
|
|
$ |
203,323 |
|
|
$ |
(203,783 |
) |
|
$ |
443,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
8,075 |
|
|
$ |
8,685 |
|
|
$ |
2,552 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,312 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
2,449 |
|
|
|
74,476 |
|
|
|
57,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,425 |
|
Contract billings in excess of cost and
recognized income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,300 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,891 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
3,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,671 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,639 |
|
Payables to affiliated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,204 |
|
|
|
193,750 |
|
|
|
(243,954 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
10,524 |
|
|
|
140,876 |
|
|
|
263,492 |
|
|
|
(243,954 |
) |
|
|
170,938 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
126,275 |
|
|
|
20,780 |
|
|
|
5,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,360 |
|
Long-term liability for unrecognized tax benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,062 |
|
|
|
2,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,492 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
5,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,369 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
136,799 |
|
|
|
167,390 |
|
|
|
277,161 |
|
|
|
(243,954 |
) |
|
|
337,396 |
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
1,467 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
1,467 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
273,840 |
|
|
|
89,156 |
|
|
|
8,526 |
|
|
|
(97,682 |
) |
|
|
273,840 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(181,912 |
) |
|
|
(55,497 |
) |
|
|
(95,054 |
) |
|
|
150,551 |
|
|
|
(181,912 |
) |
Other stockholders equity components |
|
|
13,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,657 |
|
|
|
(12,657 |
) |
|
|
13,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
106,548 |
|
|
|
33,667 |
|
|
|
(73,838 |
) |
|
|
40,171 |
|
|
|
106,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
243,257 |
|
|
$ |
201,057 |
|
|
$ |
203,323 |
|
|
$ |
(203,783 |
) |
|
$ |
443,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
14. Parent, Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements (continued)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
(Guarantor) |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
24,776 |
|
|
$ |
4,895 |
|
|
$ |
7,972 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
37,643 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
81,004 |
|
|
|
56,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,104 |
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet
billed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,225 |
|
|
|
8,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,027 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
16,092 |
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,299 |
|
Parts and supplies inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
1,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,069 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,192 |
|
Receivables from affiliated companies |
|
|
280,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(280,853 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
305,664 |
|
|
|
104,776 |
|
|
|
369,747 |
|
|
|
(280,853 |
) |
|
|
499,334 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,755 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,792 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,115 |
|
|
|
32,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,347 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
(42,228 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
6,344 |
|
|
|
5,007 |
|
|
|
7,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
269,780 |
|
|
$ |
149,653 |
|
|
$ |
409,174 |
|
|
$ |
(238,625 |
) |
|
$ |
589,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and current portion of
long-term debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,382 |
|
|
$ |
1,180 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,562 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
17,349 |
|
|
|
63,120 |
|
|
|
41,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,352 |
|
Contract billings in excess of cost and
recognized income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,779 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,947 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,657 |
|
|
|
1,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,556 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,980 |
|
|
|
(171,888 |
) |
|
|
182,092 |
|
Payables to affiliated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,923 |
|
|
|
86,042 |
|
|
|
(108,965 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
17,349 |
|
|
|
106,861 |
|
|
|
485,152 |
|
|
|
(280,853 |
) |
|
|
328,509 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
154,500 |
|
|
|
7,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,577 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,611 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,728 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
171,849 |
|
|
|
115,549 |
|
|
|
485,506 |
|
|
|
(280,853 |
) |
|
|
492,051 |
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
1,292 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
217,036 |
|
|
|
89,156 |
|
|
|
8,526 |
|
|
|
(97,682 |
) |
|
|
217,036 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(120,603 |
) |
|
|
(55,060 |
) |
|
|
(84,177 |
) |
|
|
139,237 |
|
|
|
(120,603 |
) |
Other stockholders equity components |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(713 |
) |
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
97,931 |
|
|
|
34,104 |
|
|
|
(76,332 |
) |
|
|
42,228 |
|
|
|
97,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
269,780 |
|
|
$ |
149,653 |
|
|
$ |
409,174 |
|
|
$ |
(238,625 |
) |
|
$ |
589,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
14. Parent, Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements (continued)
Condensed
Consolidating Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
(Guarantor) |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
162,305 |
|
|
$ |
91,667 |
|
|
$ |
(7,256 |
) |
|
$ |
246,716 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,262 |
|
|
|
79,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,089 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,418 |
|
|
|
2,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,457 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
5,119 |
|
|
|
14,840 |
|
|
|
4,745 |
|
|
|
(7,256 |
) |
|
|
17,448 |
|
Government fines |
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,119 |
|
|
|
145,520 |
|
|
|
86,611 |
|
|
|
(7,256 |
) |
|
|
227,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(3,119 |
) |
|
|
16,785 |
|
|
|
5,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,722 |
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
13,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,748 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest net |
|
|
(543 |
) |
|
|
(653 |
) |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,042 |
) |
Other net |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(1,175 |
) |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,327 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
10,064 |
|
|
|
14,957 |
|
|
|
5,080 |
|
|
|
(13,748 |
) |
|
|
16,353 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,159 |
|
|
|
(1,078 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
10,064 |
|
|
|
7,798 |
|
|
|
6,158 |
|
|
|
(13,748 |
) |
|
|
10,272 |
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations, net of
provision for income taxes |
|
|
(8,918 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,146 |
|
|
$ |
7,809 |
|
|
$ |
5,939 |
|
|
$ |
(13,748 |
) |
|
$ |
1,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
(Guarantor) |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
77,699 |
|
|
$ |
55,600 |
|
|
$ |
(7,833 |
) |
|
$ |
125,466 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
65,456 |
|
|
|
47,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,418 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,236 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,265 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
11,478 |
|
|
|
6,464 |
|
|
|
(7,833 |
) |
|
|
11,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
79,170 |
|
|
|
55,454 |
|
|
|
(7,833 |
) |
|
|
127,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(984 |
) |
|
|
(1,471 |
) |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,309 |
) |
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in loss of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(19,015 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest net |
|
|
(2,102 |
) |
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,709 |
) |
Other net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
(22,101 |
) |
|
|
(1,824 |
) |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
19,015 |
|
|
|
(4,586 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(650 |
) |
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(22,101 |
) |
|
|
(1,174 |
) |
|
|
(705 |
) |
|
|
19,015 |
|
|
|
(4,965 |
) |
Loss from
discontinued operations, net of
provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
(16,566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(22,101 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,744 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,271 |
) |
|
$ |
19,015 |
|
|
$ |
(22,101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
14. Parent, Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements (continued)
Condensed
Consolidating Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
(Guarantor) |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
391,298 |
|
|
$ |
233,430 |
|
|
$ |
(14,560 |
) |
|
$ |
610,168 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
337,128 |
|
|
|
201,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
538,790 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,695 |
|
|
|
4,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,223 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
6,820 |
|
|
|
37,035 |
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
(14,560 |
) |
|
|
42,295 |
|
Government fines |
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,820 |
|
|
|
382,858 |
|
|
|
219,190 |
|
|
|
(14,560 |
) |
|
|
616,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(28,820 |
) |
|
|
8,440 |
|
|
|
14,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,140 |
) |
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in loss of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
4,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,721 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest net |
|
|
(2,011 |
) |
|
|
(605 |
) |
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,119 |
) |
Other net |
|
|
(16,402 |
) |
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
(584 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,394 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
(42,512 |
) |
|
|
7,427 |
|
|
|
14,153 |
|
|
|
(4,721 |
) |
|
|
(25,653 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,316 |
|
|
|
3,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(42,512 |
) |
|
|
3,111 |
|
|
|
10,676 |
|
|
|
(4,721 |
) |
|
|
(33,446 |
) |
Loss from
discontinued operations, net of
provision for income taxes |
|
|
(12,428 |
) |
|
|
(599 |
) |
|
|
(8,467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,494 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(54,940 |
) |
|
$ |
2,512 |
|
|
$ |
2,209 |
|
|
$ |
(4,721 |
) |
|
$ |
(54,940 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
(Guarantor) |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
219,027 |
|
|
$ |
159,326 |
|
|
$ |
(26,172 |
) |
|
$ |
352,181 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
177,868 |
|
|
|
142,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320,628 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,930 |
|
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,180 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
6,354 |
|
|
|
39,311 |
|
|
|
13,640 |
|
|
|
(26,172 |
) |
|
|
33,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,355 |
|
|
|
223,109 |
|
|
|
159,649 |
|
|
|
(26,172 |
) |
|
|
362,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(6,355 |
) |
|
|
(4,082 |
) |
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,760 |
) |
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in loss of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(53,569 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest net |
|
|
(4,922 |
) |
|
|
(698 |
) |
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,132 |
) |
Other net |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before
income taxes |
|
|
(64,847 |
) |
|
|
(4,794 |
) |
|
|
(715 |
) |
|
|
53,569 |
|
|
|
(16,787 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
1,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(64,847 |
) |
|
|
(5,155 |
) |
|
|
(2,165 |
) |
|
|
53,569 |
|
|
|
(18,598 |
) |
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations, net of
provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
(48,049 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(64,847 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,355 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,214 |
) |
|
$ |
53,569 |
|
|
$ |
(64,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
14. Parent, Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements (continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
(Guarantor) |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Net cash used in operating activities
of continuing operations |
|
$ |
(12,329 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,850 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,450 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(22,629 |
) |
Net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities of
discontinued operations |
|
|
(2,128 |
) |
|
|
(599 |
) |
|
|
5,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
(14,457 |
) |
|
|
(7,449 |
) |
|
|
2,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,649 |
) |
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations, net |
|
|
105,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,568 |
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,613 |
) |
|
|
(5,277 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,890 |
) |
Acquisition of Midwest |
|
|
(24,154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,154 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and
equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used) in investing activities
of
continuing operations |
|
|
81,414 |
|
|
|
(9,220 |
) |
|
|
(5,242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,952 |
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing
activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
81,414 |
|
|
|
(9,220 |
) |
|
|
(5,242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,952 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(12,993 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,993 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
1,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,519 |
|
Advances from (repayments to) parent/affiliates |
|
|
(42,684 |
) |
|
|
27,281 |
|
|
|
15,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of bank and other debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,647 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,665 |
) |
Payments on capital leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,428 |
) |
|
|
(2,079 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,507 |
) |
Costs of debt issuance and other |
|
|
(546 |
) |
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(799 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
of continuing operations |
|
|
(54,704 |
) |
|
|
12,953 |
|
|
|
13,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,445 |
) |
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(54,704 |
) |
|
|
12,953 |
|
|
|
13,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,445 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) all activities |
|
$ |
12,253 |
|
|
$ |
(3,716 |
) |
|
$ |
12,529 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
21,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
14. Parent, Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements (continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUSAI |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
(Guarantor) |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Net cash used in operating activities
of continuing operations |
|
$ |
(6,940 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,533 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,244 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(12,717 |
) |
Net cash used in operating activities of
discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(880 |
) |
|
|
(58,705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,585 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(6,940 |
) |
|
|
(4,413 |
) |
|
|
(60,949 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,302 |
) |
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,082 |
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,082 |
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,242 |
) |
|
|
(10,147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,389 |
) |
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and
equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
of continuing operations |
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
|
|
22,840 |
|
|
|
5,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,436 |
|
Cash used in investing activities of
discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
|
|
22,840 |
|
|
|
2,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,245 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes |
|
|
19,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,500 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,226 |
|
Advances from (repayments to) parent/affiliates |
|
|
(52,714 |
) |
|
|
(6,741 |
) |
|
|
59,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of bank and other debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,519 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,555 |
) |
Costs of debt issuance and other |
|
|
(4,296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,330 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
of continuing operations |
|
|
(35,284 |
) |
|
|
(16,260 |
) |
|
|
59,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,841 |
|
Cash provided by financing activities of
discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(35,284 |
) |
|
|
(16,260 |
) |
|
|
59,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,841 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) all activities |
|
$ |
(43,724 |
) |
|
$ |
2,167 |
|
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(40,457 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
15. Subsequent Events
Acquisition
On
October 31, 2007, WGI, Willbros USA, Inc., a subsidiary of WGI, and the shareholders of Integrated Service Company LLC
(InServ) entered into a share purchase agreement
(InServ SPA), pursuant to which the Company will
acquire all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of InServ for $225,000 (InServ
Purchase Price), consisting of $202,500 payable in cash at closing and 637,475 shares of the Companys common
stock having a value of $22,500 (determined by the average closing price of common stock over the
20 trading days ending on the second trading day before the execution of the InServ SPA). The cash
portion of the closing price will be subject to a post-closing adjustment to account for any change
in InServs working capital from a predetermined target to InServs actual working capital on the
closing date. A total of $20,000 of the cash portion of the purchase price will be placed into
escrow for a period of 18 months and released from escrow in one-third increments on each of the
six-month, 12-month and 18-month anniversaries of the closing date. The escrowed cash will secure
performance of the shareholders obligations under the InServ SPA, including working capital
adjustments and indemnification obligations for breaches of the shareholders representations,
warranties and covenants included in the InServ SPA. The InServ SPA contains customary
representations, warranties, covenants and indemnification provisions.
As
a condition of the InServ SPA, the Company shall obtain the necessary financing to fund the
InServ Purchase Price. The Company anticipates financing the cash portion of the InServ Purchase Price
through a public offering of its common stock. Closing of
this acquisition is subject to other typical closing conditions and
necessary regulatory approvals. The Company expects to close the offering and
this acquisition in the fourth quarter of 2007.
Headquartered
in Tulsa, Oklahoma, InServ is a fully integrated downstream contractor with a highly experienced management team
averaging over 30 years of industry experience. InServs core competencies include turnkey project
services through program management, engineering, procurement and construction services.
Additionally, InServ provides services for the overhaul of high utilization fluid catalytic
cracking units, the main gasoline-producing unit in refineries. InServ also provides similar
overhaul services for other refinery process units as well as specialty services associated with
welding, piping, and process heaters. Additionally InServ manufactures specialty components such
as: heater coils, alloy piping, and other components which require high levels of expertise for
refineries and petrochemical plants. InServ also provides multiple secondary services to its
clients including tank services, safety services and heater services.
With the acquisition, the Company will significantly expand its service offering
and address the downstream market for integrated solutions on turnaround, maintenance and capital
projects for the hydrocarbon processing and petrochemical
industries.
Related Party Relationships
In early 2007, InServ retained Growth Capital Partners, L.P., an investment banking firm, to
assist InServ with the possible sale of the company. John T. McNabb,
II, the Companys Chairman of the Board of
Directors, is the founder and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Growth
Capital Partners, which will receive a customary fee from InServ in the event that InServ is sold.
Mr. McNabb and Randy R. Harl, the Companys President and
Chief Executive Officer and one of the Companys directors,
served on the InServ Board of Directors from 2006 until September 18, 2007.
Messrs. McNabb and Harl resigned from the Board of Directors of InServ prior to the commencement of
discussions between the Company and InServ with respect to the
possible acquisition of InServ and Mr. McNabb has recused
himself from providing any further advice to InServ as a principal of
Growth Capital Partners.
Messrs McNabb and Harl each own 3,000 shares of InServ, or individually less than 0.4 percent of
the outstanding equity interests of InServ. The Company formed a special committee of the Board of
Directors, consisting of all of the independent directors other than Mr. McNabb, to consider,
evaluate and approve the acquisition of InServ. In addition, the special committee has obtained
an opinion dated October 30, 2007 from a nationally recognized
investment banking and valuation firm
that the consideration to be paid by the Company in
the proposed acquisition is fair to the Company, from a financial
point of view.
Financing Activities
Credit Facility
The Company has received commitments from a group of lenders, led by Calyon, to replace its
existing synthetic credit facility with a $150,000 senior secured revolving credit facility (the
2007 Credit Facility). The 2007 Credit Facility can be increased to $200,000, subject to
Calyons consent, on or before the second anniversary of the closing date. The 2007 Credit
Facility includes more favorable rates and improved terms and conditions. The entire facility will
be available for performance letters of credit and 33 percent of the facility will be available for
cash borrowings and financial letters of credit. A condition precedent to close the 2007 Credit
Facility is that the Company receives a minimum of $100,000 proceeds from the planned public
offering.
40
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (In
thousands, except share and per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
2006, included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q, and the Consolidated Financial Statements and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, including
Critical Accounting Policies, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006.
OVERVIEW
Business Description
We derive our revenue from engineering; construction; and engineering, procurement and
construction (EPC) services provided to the energy industry and government entities. Through the
Company and our predecessors, we have provided services to customers in over 55 countries for
almost 100 years. During the first nine months of 2007, ninety-five percent of our revenue was
generated from continuing operations primarily in the United States
and Canada, with 5 percent of revenue being generated in Oman. We have been
active in Oman continuously since 1965 and perform maintenance activities and capital projects
there. We obtain our work through competitive bidding and through negotiations with prospective
clients. Contract values may range from several thousand dollars to several hundred million dollars
and contract durations range from a few weeks to more than two years.
Business Strategy
Our strategy is to increase stockholder value by leveraging our competitive strengths to take
advantage of the current opportunities in the global energy infrastructure market and position
ourselves for sustained longterm growth. Core tenets of our strategy include:
Focus
on managing risk. Led by our new management team, we have implemented a core set of
business conduct, practices and policies which have fundamentally improved the risk profile of the
Company. We have implemented our risk management policy by exiting higher risk countries,
increasing our activity levels in lower risk countries, diversifying our service offerings and end
markets, practicing conservative financial management and limiting contract execution risk. Risk
management is emphasized throughout all levels of the organization and covers all aspects of a
project from strategic planning, prospect identification and qualification and bidding to contract
management and financial reporting. We have implemented an improved
business acquisition process and enhanced risk
assessment and believe these processes will enable us to more effectively evaluate, structure and
execute future projects, thereby increasing our profitability and reducing our execution risk.
|
|
Focus resources in markets with the highest risk-adjusted return. North America currently
offers us the best risk-adjusted returns and the majority of our resources are focused on this
region. However, we continue to seek international opportunities which can provide superior
risk-adjusted returns and believe our extensive international experience is a competitive
advantage. We believe that markets in North Africa and the Middle East may offer attractive
opportunities for us given mid-and long-term industry trends, and we have relevant experience
in these regions. Since August of 2006, we have exited Bolivia, Ecuador, Nigeria and
Venezuela to reduce our exposure to political and security risks and we have redeployed the
proceeds from the sale of assets in these countries to North America, where we have acquired
Midwest, a mainline pipeline constructor in Canada, and we also have acquired additional
capital equipment to participate in the financially attractive energy markets. We have
planned the Integrated Services Company, LLC (Inserv) acquisition to diversify our service offerings and to generate a more
continuous and consistent revenue stream to offset the lumpiness of pipeline construction
projects. The August 2007 Global Settlement Agreement (GSA) with Ascot, the purchaser
of our Nigeria interests, settled most of the remaining contractual issues, including working capital
adjustments, and eliminated any future obligations under the indemnity provisions of the Share
Purchase Agreement except as provided in the GSA. |
|
|
|
Maintain a prudent contract portfolio. Our current contract portfolio is comprised of
over 75 percent costreimbursable work which provides for a more equitable distribution of
risk between us and our customers. While the strong current market conditions have been
beneficial in transitioning our backlog away from higher risk fixed price contracts, we intend
to maintain a balanced risktoreward portfolio going forward. New processes and procedures
have been implemented to rigorously evaluate the characteristics of prospective projects
including the contractual terms and conditions such as the required financial instruments,
corporate guarantees, payment terms, and project cash flows. |
41
|
|
|
Ethical business practices. Willbros demands that all of its employees and representatives
conduct the business of the Company in accordance with the highest ethical standards in compliance with
applicable laws, rules and regulations, with honesty and integrity, and in a manner which
demonstrates respect for others. Willbros tradition of doing the right thing and abiding by
the rule of law is reflected in its longstanding Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The
sale of the Nigeria interests not only removed our presence from a
problematic and otherwise corrupt business environment, but we have also reduced residual risks and uncertainties related to
Nigeria through our reaching of an agreement in principle to settle the
DOJ and SEC investigations into possible
violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. |
Leverage core service expertise into additional full EPC contracts. Our core expertise and
service offerings allow us to provide our customers with a single source EPC solution which creates
greater efficiencies to the benefit of both our customers and our company. In performing
integrated EPC contracts, we establish ourselves as overall project managers from the earliest
stages of project inception and are therefore better able to efficiently determine the design,
permitting, procurement and construction sequence for a project in connection with making
engineering decisions. Our customers benefit from a more seamless execution while for us, these
contracts often yield higher profit margins on the engineering and construction components of the
contract compared to stand alone contracts for similar services. Additionally, this contract
structure allows us to deploy our resources more efficiently and capture both the engineering and
construction components of these projects. Our recent award of an EPC project to expand pipeline
pump stations serving Marathon Oil Companys Garyville, La. Refinery was derived from an
engineering frame agreement, which allowed multiple awards under a single contract. InServ provides
a similar total project responsibility solution to its addressable market which is complementary to
our EPC service offering.
Leverage core capabilities and industry reputation into broader service offering. We believe our
market is characterized by increasingly larger projects and a constrained resource base. Potential
customers are invoking buying criteria which are value-driven rather than price-driven. Our
established platform and track record strongly position us to capitalize on this trend by
leveraging our expertise into a broader range of related service offerings. While we currently
provide a number of discrete services to both our core and other end-markets, we believe additional
opportunities exist to expand our core capabilities through both acquisitions and internal growth
initiatives. We strive to leverage our project management, engineering and construction skill sets
to establish additional service offerings along the energy project valuechain such as
instrumentation and electrical services, turbo-machinery services, environmental services and
pipeline system integrity services. We expect this approach to enable us to attract more critical
service resources in a tight market for both qualified personnel and critical equipment resources,
establishing us as one of the few contractors able to do so. We believe the InServ acquisition
will open more opportunities in the downstream markets such as tank construction and refinery
engineering services.
Pursue financial flexibility. Increasingly larger projects and the complex interaction of multiple
projects underway simultaneously require us to have the financial flexibility to meet material,
equipment and personnel needs to support our project commitments. We desire to use our credit
facility for performance letters of credit, financial letters of credit and cash borrowings. We
focus on strengthening our balance sheet to enable us to achieve the best terms and conditions for
our credit facilities and bonding capacities, and our continued emphasis is on the maintenance of a
strong balance sheet to maximize flexibility and liquidity for the development and growth of our
business. We also employ rigorous cash management processes to ensure the continued improvement of
cash management, including processes focused on improving contract terms as they relate to project
cash positions.
Market Demand
We believe the
fundamentals supporting the demand for engineering, construction and EPC
services for the energy industry, particularly for pipeline services in North America, will
continue to be strong for the next two to five years. Many positive developments reinforce our
view. Capital spending for the exploration and production sector of the energy industry is
expected to exceed $310 billion in 2007; this additional investment is expected to drive new
pipeline infrastructure development. Additionally, according to an October 2007 Douglas-Westwood
study, planned onshore pipeline construction capital investment is estimated to be approximately
$180 billion for the 2008 to 2012 time frame. Forecasted capital expenditures on new bitumen
production and processing facilities in the oil sands region of western Canada are expected to
exceed $90 (C$100) billion through 2015, as production levels are increased from approximately one
million barrels per day presently to more than three million barrels per day in 2015. Recent
industry articles have highlighted the need for new, large crude oil export pipelines from Canada
to the United States and to export facilities on the west coast. In the United States, new gas
production in the Rocky Mountain region has generated plans for gas pipelines to the West Coast,
Midwest and East Coast. In the southwestern United States, pipeline infrastructure build-out is now
underway to link new gas sources in the Barnett, Woodford and Fayetteville shales to premium
markets in Florida and the Northeast. Liquefied natural gas is also expected to bring more
opportunities to Willbros, both in North America and in other producing/exporting countries.
42
The
engineering market in North America continues to be capacity
constrained. We are selectively accepting assignments that offer
higher margins and better contract terms, and position us for
EPC assignments. Our engineering operations are currently operating at full capacity, constrained
by the availability of qualified personnel. We opened our newest engineering office in Kansas
City, Missouri in the second quarter of 2007. Our overall Engineering headcount increased by 128 in 2007,
allowing us to continue to take advantage of the demand for engineering services. We continue to
evaluate several foreign locations to expand our engineering resource base. We believe the high
level of engineering activity is a precursor to higher levels of construction activity in North
America.
North Americas demand for our services is demonstrated by our near-record backlog at
September 30, 2007 of $1,098,884 that has grown 82.5 percent from the $602,272 backlog reported at
December 31, 2006. More importantly, the composition of our backlog has moved to predominantly (75
percent) cost reimbursable contracts, which are lower risk contracts. At December 31, 2006, cost
reimbursable contracts in backlog were only 45 percent of the total backlog. We have now replaced
the entire backlog from Nigeria with lower risk backlog in North America. The majority of the
backlog additions are in the U.S. portion of our Construction segment and these are on much better
terms, primarily a cost reimbursable basis versus fixed price, resulting in a much lower risk
profile for the U.S. portion of this segment. We also now see opportunities to contract work in our
EPC segment on cost reimbursable basis. Notably, our visibility extends into 2009, with our
current capacity for mainline pipeline construction in the U.S. substantially booked through the first quarter
of 2009.
In addition to the increased demand for our pipeline engineering services, our recent awards
for pipeline and station construction projects in North America reinforce our belief that our
ability to obtain improved terms and conditions and better pricing will continue in 2007 and
beyond. Recent awards support our belief that customers recognize the imbalance in the supply and
demand for pipeline engineering and construction, and will offer better terms and conditions,
resulting in lower risk to us, to control pricing increases for our services and to ensure
availability of our services.
Significant Business Developments
InServ Acquisition
On
October 31, 2007 we entered into a share purchase agreement (InServ SPA) to
acquire InServ, based in Tulsa, Oklahoma for $225,000 (InServ
Purchase Price). With the acquisition of InServ, we will significantly expand our service
offering which will allow us to address the downstream market for integrated solutions on
turnaround, maintenance and capital projects for the hydrocarbon processing and petrochemical
industries. InServ is a fully integrated downstream contractor with a highly experienced management
team averaging over 30 years of industry experience. InServs core competencies include turnkey
project services through program management and EPC
services, which aligns with and complements the Willbros EPC service offering. Additionally,
InServ is one of five contractors in the US that provide services for the overhaul of high
utilization fluid catalytic cracking units, the
main gasoline-producing unit in refineries. These units, which operate continually, are overhauled
on a three to five year schedule. InServ has performed projects for 60 of 149 operable refineries in the
United States, providing a balanced suite of services to a customer list which includes Valero,
ChevronTexaco, Marathon, ExxonMobil, BP and ConocoPhillips.
Approximately 80 percent of InServs current
services offering are spread among six primary services: Construction, Construction and Turnaround,
Field, Manufacturing, Tank, and Turnkey Project Services; the largest and smallest shares of
revenue being greater than 20 percent and 9 percent respectively. InServ also provides similar overhaul services for other
refinery process units as well as specialty services associated with welding, piping, and process
heaters. Additionally InServ manufactures specialty components such as: heater coils, alloy piping,
and other components which require high levels of expertise for refineries and petrochemical
plants.
Since its founding in 1994,
InServ has generated 11 years of consistent growth and is in the
midst of a market with strong fundamental drivers including record oil prices and demand for
hydrocarbon derivatives. We believe much of the growth in the market addressed by InServ is driven
by a shift to heavier and more sour crude streams and the tight labor market which is leading to
greater outsourcing of refinery services. InServ has also benefited from the shift to more cost
reimbursable contract terms and conditions as evidenced by approximately three quarters of its
current contract backlog being cost reimbursable. We also believe
there may be opportunities for growth through selective and strategic acquisitions of businesses or assets complementary to the
current suite of its services.
43
We
anticipate financing the cash portion of the purchase price
through the public offering of our common stock.
Resolution of regulatory matters
We have reached an agreement in principle with representatives of the DOJ, subject to approval by
the DOJ, to settle its previously disclosed investigation into possible violations of the FCPA. In
addition, the Company has reached an agreement in principle with the staff of the SEC to resolve
its previously disclosed investigation of possible violations of the FCPA and possible violations
of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These investigations stem
primarily from our former operations in Bolivia, Ecuador and Nigeria.
As a result of the agreements in principle, we have increased the accrual related to these
investigations by $8,300 in the third quarter of 2007, bringing the aggregate liability for those
matters to $32,300. Additional information is provided in the Note 13 Contingencies,
Commitments, and Other Circumstances located in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements and in Part II. Other Information, Item 1.A Risk Factors.
Canada Pipeline Construction Company Acquisition
On July 1, 2007, we acquired the assets and operations of Midwest Management (1987) Ltd.
(Midwest). Midwest provides pipeline construction, rehabilitation and maintenance, water crossing
installations or replacements, and facilities fabrication to the oil and gas industry,
predominantly in western Canada. The total purchase amount was $24,154, consisting of $22,793 in
purchase price and approximately $1,361 in deal costs.
U.S. Construction Major Contract
We have been awarded a $303,000 installation contract for the construction of three segments
of the Midcontinent Express Pipeline by Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC, a joint venture between
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners and Energy Transfer Partners. The three segments will traverse
Oklahoma and Texas and are comprised of approximately 257 miles of 42-inch pipeline. The projected
start date for the project is third quarter of 2008.
Induced 6.5% Note Conversions
The 6.5% Notes were converted in part in May of 2007 under four transactions resulting in
$52,450 in aggregate principal amount being converted into 2,987,582 shares of the Companys common
stock. We made aggregate cash payments to the holders of $12,720, plus $1,481 in accrued interest
for the current interest period. Loss on early extinguishment of debt for all transactions totaled
$15,375, including related debt issue costs. This conversion
strengthened our balance sheet, improved our
debt to equity ratio at September 30, 2007, to 1.31 to 1 and
enhances our ability to secure the
financial instruments required of us by some of our customers. A stronger balance sheet positions
us for more and larger projects and is a competitive advantage in todays tight market.
Credit Facility
As
discussed above, we have received commitments from a group of lenders to replace our existing
synthetic credit facility with the 2007 Credit Facility. The 2007 Credit Facility includes more
favorable rates and improved terms and conditions and is expected to generate a minimum of
approximately $2,000 of annual costs savings beginning in the first year. A condition precedent to
close the 2007 Credit Facility is that the Company receives a minimum of $100,000 proceeds from the
planned public offering of our common stock. We expect to close the facility concurrent with the
planned public offering of our common stock.
44
Financial
Summary (continuing operations)
For the quarter ended September 30, 2007, we had income from continuing operations of $10,272
or $0.36 per basic share and $0.32 per diluted share on revenue of $246,716. This compares to a
loss of $4,965 or $0.23 per share on revenue of $125,466 for the same quarter of 2006. During the
quarter, we reduced the continuing operations accrual for Government fines by $2,000 based on the
agreements in principle with the SEC and DOJ.
Revenue of $246,716 for the third quarter of 2007 represents a $121,250 (96.6%) increase over
the revenue for the same period in 2006. The Construction (increased $102,780 or 112.7%) and EPC
(increased $13,102 or 93.3%) segments were the drivers for this revenue growth.
Contract income increased $27,579 (228.9%) to $39,627 in the third quarter of 2007 as compared
to $12,048 in the same quarter of 2006 due to increased activity and improvement in contract margin
in the Construction and Engineering segments. Overall contract margin in the third quarter of 2007,
as compared to the third quarter of 2006, increased 6.5 percentage points to 16.1% from 9.6%. The
Engineering segment had margin improvement of 11.1 percentage points, Construction improved margin
by 6.7 percentage points and EPC margin improved 3.3 percentage points.
Depreciation and amortization increased $2,192 (67.1%) to $5,457 in the third quarter of 2007
from $3,265 in the third quarter of 2006. All of the increase is attributed to the Construction
segment and is a result of increased capital spending, primarily on construction equipment to
support the revenue growth. The acquisition of Midwest accounted for $779 of the increase.
G&A expenses increased $6,356 (57.3%) to $17,448 in the third quarter of 2007 from $11,092 in
the third quarter of 2006. Corporate G&A increased $3,674 and Business Unit G&A increased $2,682.
The primary driver for the increase is the increase in business activity reflected in the higher revenue
numbers. As a percent of revenue, G&A decreased to 7.1% for the quarter compared to 8.8% for the
same quarter of 2006.
Non-Operating
We recorded income tax expense of $6,081 on income before income taxes from continuing
operations of $16,353 resulting in an effective income tax rate of 37.2%.
Discontinued Operations
For the third quarter of 2007, the loss from discontinued operations was $9,126 or $0.32 per
basic share compared to a loss of $17,136 or $0.80 per basic share in the third quarter of 2006.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the loss from discontinued operations was $21,494 or
$0.78 per basic share compared to a loss of $46,249 or $2.15 per basic share for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006. For the third quarter of 2007, the net loss was comprised primarily of
the accrual of a settlement amount due to the SEC under an agreement in principle
of $10,300, consisting of $8,900 for profit
disgorgement plus $1,400 of pre-judgment interest thereon. The profit disgorgement was specifically
attributable to one of our Nigerian projects, and is therefore classified as discontinued
operations. For the year to date, the results of discontinued operations are comprised of 38 days
of our operations in Nigeria, the gain on the sale of our Nigeria assets and operations, the
accrual for profit disgorgement and pre-judgment interest thereon, and 213 days of service provided
under the Transition Services Agreement (TSA).
Transition Services Agreement
Concurrent
with the sale of our Nigeria assets and Nigeria based operations, we entered into a two-year TSA with Ascot Offshore Nigeria
Limited (Ascot). Under the agreement, we were primarily providing labor in the form of seconded
employees to work under the direction of Ascot, and Company owned equipment. Ascot has agreed to
reimburse us for the seconded employee transition services costs. There remain unresolved issues
related to the use of the Company owned equipment. The Company and Ascot are working toward
resolution of these issues. The Company has not recorded a receivable related to the use of the
equipment. Through September 30, 2007, total reimbursable costs totaled approximately $21,582. The
after-tax residual net loss from providing these transition services is $370, or less than 2% of
the incurred costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Both the Company and Ascot are
working to shift the transition services provided by us to direct services secured by Ascot.
As previously
discussed, the Company has made available certain equipment to Ascot
for its use. This equipment was not sold to Ascot under the Agreement. Through September 30, 2007
the Company has not resolved with Ascot the rental rates for this equipment for the period February
8, 2007 through September 30, 2007. As agreed in the GSA, on September 14, 2007, the Company
received an appraisal for this equipment; the fair-value of the equipment was $8,477. The
Companys net book value for this equipment at September 30, 2007 is $2,377. This equipment is
comprised of construction equipment, rolling stock, and generator sets. The Company and Ascot are
working to resolve the issue of rental equipment, either through cash settlement or though an
exchange of equipment.
Global Settlement Agreement (GSA)
On September 7, 2007, the Company finalized the GSA with Ascot. The significant components of
the agreement include:
|
|
|
A reduction to the purchase price of $25,000; |
|
|
|
|
Ascot agreed to provide supplemental backstop letters of credit in the amount of $20,322 issued by
a non-Nigerian bank approved by the Company; |
45
|
|
|
Ascot provided specific indemnities related to two ongoing projects that Ascot acquired
as part of the Agreement; |
|
|
|
|
Ascot and the Company agreed that all working capital adjustments as provided for in the
Agreement were resolved; and |
|
|
|
|
Except as provided in the GSA, Ascot and the Company waived all of their respective rights and obligations relating to
indemnifications provided in the February 7, 2007 Share Purchase Agreement concerning any
breach of a covenant or any representation or warranty. |
By
finalizing the GSA with Ascot, we have further reduced our risk
profile in West Africa.
The reduction to the purchase price was offset with amounts owed us by Ascot of $13,924. This
resulted in a net payment to Ascot of $11,076, and has eliminated any risk of the
collection on amounts owed to us under the TSA through September 30, 2007. With Ascot providing
non-Nigerian backstop bank letters of credit that we have ready access to, we
believe the risk to us of incurring losses from calls being made on our
outstanding letters of credit is minimized. However, during the transition from us to Ascot
their operations in Nigeria have continued to be impacted by the same difficulties that led to our
exit from Nigeria, as well as by additional challenges.
Ascots continued willingness and ability to perform our former
projects in West Africa are important ingredients to further
reducing our risk profile in Nigeria and elsewhere in West Africa. As
such, it was important to receive additional assurances from Ascot
related to ongoing projects because of our continuing parent guarantees on those projects. To
date no claims have been made against our parent guarantees. The GSA also resolves all working
capital adjustment issues between us and Ascot. In resolving the working capital adjustment, we
were able to relieve assets and liabilities from our books that we felt would have been
components of any working capital adjustment. The completion of the GSA allows us to recognize
a gain on the transaction of $183. It also allows our management to
move even closer to putting
the Ascot transaction and our exit from Nigeria behind us and focus on better risk-adjusted
opportunities.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
In our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, we identified and
disclosed our significant accounting policies. Subsequent to December 31, 2006, the following
generally accepted accounting principles have been adopted:
|
|
|
FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, |
|
|
|
|
FASB Staff Position No. AUG AIR-1, Accounting for Planned Major Maintenance
Activities, and |
The following modifications to generally accepted accounting principles are currently being
reviewed for their impact upon adoption effective with our fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, |
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. |
46
OTHER FINANCIAL MEASURES
EBITDA
We use EBITDA (earnings before net interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) as
part of our overall assessment of financial performance by comparing EBITDA between accounting
periods. We believe that EBITDA is used by the financial community as a method of measuring our
performance and of evaluating the market value of companies considered to be in businesses similar
to ours. EBITDA from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was
$(10,311) as compared to $(1,475) for the same period in 2006, an $8,836 (599.1%) decrease. EBITDA
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, includes a $22,000 charge estimated for DOJ fines
and a $15,375 charge for the early extinguishment of $52,450 in aggregate principal
amount of our 6.5% Notes.
A reconciliation of EBITDA from continuing operations to GAAP financial information follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(33,446 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,598 |
) |
Interest, net |
|
|
2,119 |
|
|
|
6,132 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
7,793 |
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
13,223 |
|
|
|
9,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
(10,311 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BACKLOG
In our industry, backlog is considered an indicator of potential future performance because it
represents a portion of the future revenue stream. Our strategy is not focused solely on backlog
additions but on capturing quality backlog with margins commensurate with acceptable levels of risks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Backlog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
$ |
883,365 |
|
|
|
80.4 |
% |
|
$ |
320,461 |
|
|
|
53.2 |
% |
Engineering |
|
|
89,527 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
92,956 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
% |
EPC |
|
|
125,992 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
188,855 |
|
|
|
31.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total, continuing operations |
|
|
1,098,884 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
602,272 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
406,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total backlog |
|
$ |
1,098,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,009,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog consists of anticipated revenue from the uncompleted portions of existing contracts
and contracts whose award is reasonably assured. Backlog from continuing operations at September
30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was $1,098,884 and $602,272,
respectively, representing an 82.5 percent increase.
The increase in backlog is primarily due to the award of the Midcontinent Express project, the
SouthEast Supply Header contract, the ETC Farrar to Groveton project, and the Suncor Steep Bank
project. These increases were offset by backlog work-off of $610,136 through the first nine months
of 2007. We believe the backlog figures are firm, subject only to the cancellation and
modification provisions contained in various contracts. Historically, a substantial amount of our
revenue in a given year has not been in our backlog at the beginning of that year. Additionally,
due to the short duration of many jobs, contracts awarded and completed within a reporting period
will not be reflected in backlog. We generate revenue from numerous sources, including contracts of
long or short duration entered into during a year as well as from various contractual processes,
including change orders, extra work, variations in the scope of work
and the effect of escalation,
or currency fluctuation formulas. These revenue sources are not added to backlog until realization
is assured.
Backlog for Discontinued Operations was $406,780 at December 31, 2006, consisting of backlog
related to our Nigeria operations that were sold in February 2007.
47
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Our contract revenue and contract costs are significantly impacted by the capital budgets of
our clients and the timing and location of development projects in the energy industry worldwide.
Contract revenue and cost variations by segment from year to year are the result of: (a) entering
and exiting work countries; (b) the execution of new contract awards; (c) the completion of
contracts; and (d) the overall level of demand for our services.
Our ability to be successful in obtaining and executing contracts outside the U.S. can be
affected by the relative strength or weakness of the U.S. dollar compared to the currencies of our
competitors, our clients and our work locations.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2006
Contract Revenue
Contract revenue increased $121,250 (96.6%) to $246,716 due to increases in all segments. A
quarter-to-quarter comparison of revenue is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Change |
|
Construction |
|
$ |
193,984 |
|
|
$ |
91,204 |
|
|
$ |
102,780 |
|
|
|
112.7 |
% |
Engineering |
|
|
25,584 |
|
|
|
20,216 |
|
|
|
5,368 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
% |
EPC |
|
|
27,148 |
|
|
|
14,046 |
|
|
|
13,102 |
|
|
|
93.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
246,716 |
|
|
$ |
125,466 |
|
|
$ |
121,250 |
|
|
|
96.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction revenue in 2007 increased over the prior year by $102,780 driven primarily by
increases of $68,295 in U.S. construction mainly related to three new
major projects; $31,904 in
Canada related to the addition of a major project and $2,580 in Oman.
Engineering revenue increased $5,368 due to increased billable hours (both headcount and
utilization).
EPC revenue increased $13,102 as the result of an improved mix of new projects and a
significant increase in activity on our largest EPC project.
Contract Income
Contract income increased $27,579 (228.9%) to $39,627 in the third quarter of 2007 as compared
to the same quarter in 2006. A quarter-to-quarter comparison of contract income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Change |
|
Construction |
|
$ |
30,580 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
$ |
8,292 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
$ |
22,288 |
|
|
|
268.8 |
% |
Engineering |
|
|
6,550 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
% |
|
|
2,924 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
% |
|
|
3,626 |
|
|
|
124.0 |
% |
EPC |
|
|
2,497 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
1,665 |
|
|
|
200.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
39,627 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
% |
|
$ |
12,048 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
$ |
27,579 |
|
|
|
228.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction contract income increased over 2006 by $22,288 driven primarily by increases in
activity for U.S. construction of $17,715 and an increase in Canada of $1,347 and an increase in
Oman of $2,348 related to an increase in activity for oilfield services while indirect contract
cost decreased $878 due to the consolidation of equipment and overhead support functions.
Engineering contract margin improved 11.1 percentage points in the third quarter of 2007
compared to the third quarter of 2006 accounting for $2,850 of the $3,626 increase. The margin
improvement was driven by increased demand for our engineering services allowing for higher pricing
combined with a more favorable mix of company versus subcontractor and third party resources.
EPC realized a 3.3 percentage point increase in contract margin, which when combined with the
increased revenue resulted in a $1,665 increase in contract income.
Other Operating Expenses
Depreciation and amortization increased $2,192 (67.1%) to $5,457 in the third quarter of 2007
from $3,265 in the same quarter of last year primarily due to increasing our equipment fleet in the
last half of 2006 through the third quarter of 2007, utilizing a combination of capital leases and
equipment purchases. In the third quarter of 2007, we
added
$4,655 of equipment through capital leases, $7,952 of equipment through purchases and $14,873
in depreciable assets though the acquisition of Midwest.
48
G&A expenses increased $6,356 (57.3%) to $17,448 in the third quarter of 2007 from $11,092 in
the third quarter of 2006. Corporate G&A increased $3,674 and business unit G&A increased $2,682.
Salaries and benefits increased $2,473 as a result of increased staff at corporate and the segments
supporting increased business activity and as a result of increases in stock compensation, and
bonuses. Process and travel expenses increased $875 as a result of increased activity. Consulting
expense increased $586 primarily at the corporate headquarters due to
continued work on the SEC and DOJ
investigation, enhancements to the accounting system, and increased risk management activities.
Bank charges increased $697 and accounting and audit expense increased $649.
Government fines from continuing operations include a $2,000 reduction to $22,000 based on our
agreements in principle with the SEC and DOJ.
Non-Operating Items
Interest income increased to $1,029 in the third quarter of 2007 from $337 in the same quarter
last year. The $692 (205.3%) increase is due to interest income earned on the $125,068 in net
proceeds received as a result of the sale of the Nigeria assets and operations. The proceeds were
received in the first quarter of 2007. Since the first quarter a decreasing trend of interest
income resulted from lower cash balances, including $24,154 used for the Midwest acquisition.
Interest expense decreased to $2,071 in the third quarter from $3,046 in the same quarter of
last year. The $975 (32.0%) reduction in interest expense was driven primarily by the $52,450
reduction in the outstanding principal amount of the 6.5% Notes, as a result of their conversion to
common stock in the second quarter of 2007.
Other net resulted in an expense of $1,327 in the third quarter of 2007 compared to income
of $432 in the same quarter of last year. The third quarter of 2007 included a $1,071 charge
related to the settlement of a lawsuit with a vendor. The third quarter of 2006 includes gains on
sales of property, plant and equipment of $522, all related to the sale of Canadian real estate and
other equipment.
Income tax We recognized $6,081 of income tax expense on income from continuing operations
of $16,353 before income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2007. During the third
quarter of 2006, we recorded income tax expense of $379 on a loss from continuing operations of
$4,586 for the three months ended September 30, 2006. The Company, during the third quarter 2007,
recognized increased income tax expense due to improved financial performance in the U.S.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
Contract Revenue
Contract revenue from continuing operations increased $257,987 (73.3%) to $610,168 due
primarily to an increase in the Construction segment. A year-to-date comparison of revenue is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Change |
|
Construction |
|
$ |
476,638 |
|
|
$ |
257,587 |
|
|
$ |
219,051 |
|
|
|
85.0 |
% |
Engineering |
|
|
66,040 |
|
|
|
55,621 |
|
|
|
10,419 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
% |
EPC |
|
|
67,490 |
|
|
|
38,973 |
|
|
|
28,517 |
|
|
|
73.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
610,168 |
|
|
$ |
352,181 |
|
|
$ |
257,987 |
|
|
|
73.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction revenue increased by $219,051 driven primarily by the increase in U.S.
construction of $148,342 and an increase in revenues in Canada of $53,358 related to the addition
of a major project and an increase in Oman of $17,351.
49
Engineering revenue increased $10,419 due to an increase in billable hours (both headcount and
utilization). Work on new contacts, since the third quarter of 2006, accounted for $14,406 of
revenue, while existing contracts contributed approximately $51,634 of revenue.
EPC revenue increased $28,517 primarily as the result of a significant increase in activity on
our largest EPC project.
Contract Income
Contract income increased $39,825 (126.2%) to $71,378 in the first three quarters of 2007 as
compared to the same period in 2006. A period-to-period comparison of contract income is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Change |
|
Construction |
|
$ |
48,672 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
$ |
19,415 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
$ |
29,257 |
|
|
|
150.7 |
% |
Engineering |
|
|
16,874 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
% |
|
|
9,023 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
|
7,851 |
|
|
|
87.0 |
% |
EPC |
|
|
5,832 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
3,115 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
2,717 |
|
|
|
87.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
71,378 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
$ |
31,553 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
$ |
39,825 |
|
|
|
126.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The contract income increase was a function of significantly higher contract revenues as
discussed above and slightly better margins.
Construction contract income increased $29,257 over 2006 despite the negative impact on
contract income and margins experienced in the first six months of 2007 due to sustained inclement
weather. U.S. construction increased $12,756, Canada increased $10,354, mainly due to the addition
of a major project in 2007, while Oman increased $2,965 related to
increased activity in oilfield
services, while indirect contract cost decreased $3,182 due to the consolidation of equipment and
overhead support functions.
Engineering contract income increased $7,851 on contract margins that increased 9.3 percentage
points during the first nine months of 2007 as compared to the first nine months of 2006. As
previously indicated, this improvement was driven by an increased mix of company direct labor
versus third party and subcontractor services. The higher mix of in-house labor, improved
utilization and higher headcount are characteristics of the strong demand for engineering work and
our success of hiring and retaining in-house engineers.
EPC contract income increased $2,717 on increased revenues and a slight margin percent
improvement.
Other Operating Expenses
Depreciation
and amortization increased $4,043 (44.0%) to $13,223 in the first nine months of
2007 from $9,180 in the same period last year primarily due to our increase in plant, property, and
equipment throughout the last half of 2006 and the first half of 2007 through capital leases and
direct purchase. For the first nine months of 2007, we added $29,780 of equipment through capital
leases and $15,890 of equipment through purchases along with $14,873 in depreciable assets from the
acquisition of Midwest.
G&A expenses increased $9,162 (27.7%) to $42,295 in the first nine months of 2007 from $33,133
in the same period of last year. Corporate G&A increased $5,937 and business unit G&A increased
$3,225. Salaries and benefits increased $4,018 as a result of additional staff supporting
increased business activity and as a result of increases in stock compensation, and bonuses.
Consulting expense increased $1,076 primarily at the corporate headquarters due to continued work
on the SEC and DOJ investigation, enhancements to the accounting system and increased risk management
activities. Bank charges increased $1,762 and accounting and auditing fees increased $849. Process
and travel increased $592.
Government fines include $22,000 based on the agreements in principle with the SEC and DOJ.
Non-Operating Items
Interest income increased to $4,433 in the nine months of 2007 from $1,350 in the first nine
months of last year. The $3,083 (228.4%) increase is due primarily to interest income earned on the
$125,068 in proceeds received in the first quarter of 2007 from the sale of the Nigeria assets and
operations.
50
Interest expense decreased to $6,552 in the first nine months of 2007 from $7,482 in the
first nine months of last year. The $930 (12.4%) decrease in interest expense was driven primarily
by a $52,450 reduction in the outstanding principal amount of the 6.5% Notes as a result of their conversion to common stock in
the second quarter of 2007, partially offset by the addition $28,550 in capital leases.
Other net resulted in an expense of $2,019 in the first nine months of 2007 compared to
income of $105 in the same period last year. The $2,124 (2,022.9%) increase is a result of a $997
registration delay penalty related to privately placed shares of common stock, a $350 settlement
associated with an ongoing dispute related to an engineering project, offset by the $1,051 gain on
the sale of land, buildings, and equipment in Houston, Texas. Also reflected in the increased
expense is a $1,071 charge related to the settlement of a lawsuit with a vendor.
Loss on early extinguishment of debt we induced conversion of approximately $52,450 (62.1%)
of aggregate principal amount of our 6.5% Notes resulting in the recognition of a loss on early
extinguishment of debt of $15,375.
Income tax We recognized $7,793 of income tax expense on a loss of $25,653 before income
taxes in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to income tax expense of $1,811 on a
loss from continuing operations of $16,787 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The
circumstances that gave rise to the Company recording tax provisions while incurring losses for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 were primarily due to taxable income being generated
in certain tax jurisdictions, and the Company having incurred non-deductible expenses and expenses
in Panama, where the Company is domiciled, which receives no tax benefit.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our objective in financing our business is to maintain adequate financial resources and access
to additional liquidity. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the proceeds from the
sale of our Nigeria assets and operations were our principal source of funding. We anticipate that
cash on hand, future cash flows from operations and the availability of a revolving credit facility (see
below) will be sufficient to fund our working capital needs in the near term. However, we are
reviewing all opportunities, including accessing the public markets to the extent that market
conditions and other factors permit, to provide working capital to fund our growing backlog, to
strengthen our balance sheet, to meet current capital equipment
requirements, and to pursue business expansion opportunities including
potential acquisitions.
Additional sources and uses of capital
Financing of Pending Acquisition
On
October 31, 2007, we entered into a definitive agreement
for the purchase of all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of InServ. The purchase
price will be $225,000, consisting of $202,500 payable in cash at closing and Willbros Group, Inc.
common stock having a value of $22,500. The cash portion of the purchase price will be subject to a
post-closing adjustment to account for any change in InServs working capital from a predetermined
target to InServs actual working capital on the closing date.
We
anticipate financing the cash portion of the purchase
price through a public offering of our common stock.
2007 Credit Facility
Concurrent with our planned public offering, we are replacing our current synthetic credit
facility. We have received commitments from a group of lenders, led by Calyon, to replace our
existing synthetic credit facility with a $150,000 senior secured revolving credit facility (the
2007 Credit Facility) that can be increased to $200,000 with lender approval. The 2007 Credit
Facility includes more favorable rates and improved terms and conditions and is expected to
generate a minimum of approximately $2,000 of annual costs savings beginning in the first year.
The entire facility will be available for performance letters of credit and 33 percent of the
facility will be available for cash borrowings and financial letters of credit. A condition
precedent to close the 2007 Credit Facility is that the Company receives a minimum of $100,000
proceeds from the planned public offering. We strive to manage our cash rigorously and have
implemented processes to ensure the continued improvement of cash management, including processes
focused on improving contract terms as it relates to project cash positions.
51
2006 Credit Facility
On
October 27, 2006, Willbros USA, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered
into a $100,000 three-year senior secured synthetic credit facility (the 2006 Credit Facility)
with a group of lenders led by Calyon New York Branch (Calyon). At September 30, 2007, the 2006
Credit Facility had available capacity of $19,832. We may elect to increase the total capacity
under the 2006 Credit Facility to $150,000, with consent from Calyon. We have received a
commitment from Calyon, which expires December 2007, to increase the capacity under the 2006 Credit
Facility to $125,000. As of September 30, 2007 we have not exercised this option to extend the
2006 Credit Facility and currently anticipate that the 2007 Credit Facility will replace the 2006
Credit Facility in its entirety. Borrowings have not taken place, nor is it our present intent to
use the 2006 Credit Facility for future borrowings. The 2006 Credit Facility was established
primarily to provide a source for letters of credit. Unamortized costs associated with the creation
of the 2006 Credit Facility of $1,463 and $1,986 are included in other assets at September 30,
2007, and December 31, 2006, respectively, and are being amortized over the three-year term of the
credit facility ending October 2009.
As of September 30, 2007, there were no borrowings outstanding under the 2006 Credit Facility
and there were $80,168 in outstanding letters of credit, consisting of $59,846 issued for projects
in continuing operations and $20,322 issued for projects related to Discontinued Operations. As of
December 31, 2006, there were no borrowings outstanding under the 2006 Credit Facility and there
were $64,545 in outstanding letters of credit, consisting of $41,920 issued for projects in
continuing operations and $22,625 issued for projects related to Discontinued Operations. We are
currently prohibited from borrowing under the 2006 Credit Facility due to debt incurrence
restrictions of the 6.5% Notes.
The 2006 Credit Facility includes customary affirmative and negative covenants, such as
limitations on the creation of new indebtedness and on certain liens, restrictions on certain
transactions and maintenance of the following financial covenants:
|
|
|
A consolidated tangible net worth in an amount of not less than the sum of $116,561 plus
50 percent of consolidated net income earned in each fiscal quarter ended after December
31, 2006; |
|
|
|
|
A maximum senior leverage ratio of 1.00 to 1.00 for the fiscal quarter ending September
30, 2007 and for each fiscal quarter thereafter; |
|
|
|
|
A fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 3.00 to 1.00, for the fiscal quarter
ended September 30, 2007, and for each quarter thereafter; |
|
|
|
|
A prohibition on capital expenditures (cost of assets added through purchase or capital
lease) if our liquidity falls below $50,000. |
If these covenants are violated, it would be considered an event of default entitling the
lenders to terminate the remaining commitment, call all outstanding letters of credit, and
accelerate any principal and interest outstanding. As of September 30, 2007;
|
|
|
Our consolidated tangible net worth was $151,934, which was approximately $35,373 in
excess of the tangible net worth we were required to maintain under the credit facility; |
|
|
|
|
We are in compliance with the maximum senior leverage ratio because we have incurred no
revolving advance or other senior debt; |
|
|
|
|
Our fixed charge coverage ratio was 6.17 to 1.00; |
|
|
|
|
Our cash balance as of September 30, 2007 was $58,709,
which allowed us to add $53,926 of fixed assets to
our balance sheet during the previous 12 months. |
52
At September 30, 2007, we were in compliance with all of these covenants.
Our capital planning process is focused on utilizing cash in ways that enhance the value of
our company. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we used cash for a variety of
activities including working capital needs, capital expenditures, and acquisitions.
Cash Flows
Cash flows provided by (used in) continuing operations by type of activity were as follows for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Operating Activities |
|
$ |
(22,629 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,717 |
) |
Investing Activities |
|
|
66,952 |
|
|
|
26,436 |
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
(28,445 |
) |
|
|
7,841 |
|
Statements of cash flows for entities with international operations that are local
currency functional exclude the effects of the changes in foreign currency exchange rates that
occur during any given period, as these are non-cash charges. As a result, changes reflected in
certain accounts on the consolidated condensed statements of cash flows may not reflect the changes
in corresponding accounts on the consolidated condensed balance sheets.
Operating Activities
Operating
activities of continuing operations used $22,629 of cash in the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 compared to a use of $12,717 in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Cash
flows from operating activities decreased $9,912 primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
a decrease in cash as a result of an increase in other
working capital of $41,669 due primarily to increased receivables as
a result of higher revenues; and |
|
|
|
|
an increase of $31,757 in cash generated by operations
excluding non-cash charges of $33,612. |
Investing Activities
Investing activities of continuing operations provided $66,952 of cash in the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 compared to providing $26,436 in the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
Significant transactions impacting cash flows from investing activities include:
|
|
|
disposition of discontinued operations, for the nine months ended September 30, 2007
provided $105,568 of cash compared to $32,082 in the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
In 2007 the proceeds were from the sale of our Nigeria assets and operations, while in 2006
the proceeds were from the sale of the Opal gas facility and the sale of our Venezuela
assets and operations; |
|
|
|
|
disposition of property, plant, and equipment for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 provided $1,428 of cash compared to $8,243; and |
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of Midwest in 2007 used $24,154 of cash. |
Financing Activities
Financing activities of continuing operations used $28,455 of cash in the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 compared to providing $7,841 in the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
Significant transactions impacting cash flows from financing activities include:
|
|
|
$12,993 of cash used to induce the conversion of $52,450 of the 6.5% Notes; |
|
|
|
|
cash used in payments on capital leases of $7,507; and |
|
|
|
|
cash used in payments on notes payable of $8,665. |
53
Capital Requirements
During
the first nine months of 2007, we used $22,629 of cash in our continuing operations.
While this cash use has been significant we believe that through our increase in activity combined
with our conservative financial management we will be able to provide cash from continuing
operations in the near term. As such, we are focused on the following significant capital
requirements: providing working capital for projects in process and those scheduled to begin, the pending acquisition of InServ, the acquisition of additional
construction equipment, and the payments due to the government related to fines, and
profit disgorgement.
|
|
|
We believe that we will be able to support our ongoing working capital needs through
operating cash flows as well as the availability of the 2007 Credit Facility. |
|
|
|
|
We expect to fund the cash portion of the acquisition of InServ in its entirety with the
proceeds from our impending public offering of common stock. |
|
|
|
|
We expect to use any remaining net proceeds form the public offering to acquire
additional construction equipment instrumental to completing our existing backlog of work
at the highest return available. |
|
|
|
|
We intend to fund the future payments that we will make to the SEC and the DOJ under the
proposed terms of our settlements in principle from operating cash flow. |
Contractual Obligations
As of September 30, 2007, we had $102,050 of outstanding debt related to the convertible
notes. In addition, in 2007 and 2006, we entered into various capital leases of construction
equipment and property with a value of $41,888. We also have a contractual requirement to pay a
facility fee of 5 percent of aggregate commitments under the 2006 Credit Facility. We have acquired
a note to finance insurance premiums in the amount of $10,051.
Other contractual obligations and commercial commitments, as detailed in our annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, did not materially change except for payments made
in the normal course of business.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Note 2 New Accounting Pronouncements in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q for a summary of recently issued accounting
standards.
54
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included or incorporated by
reference in this Form 10-Q that address activities, events or developments which we expect or
anticipate will or may occur in the future, including such things as future capital expenditures
(including the amount and nature thereof), oil, gas, gas liquids and power prices, demand for our
services, the amount and nature of future investments by governments, expansion and other
development trends of the energy industry, business strategy, expansion and growth of our business
and operations, the outcome of government investigations and legal proceedings and other such
matters are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions
and analyses we made in light of our experience and our perception of historical trends, current
conditions and expected future developments as well as other factors we believe are appropriate
under the circumstances. However, whether actual results and developments will conform to our
expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. As a result, actual
results could differ materially from our expectations. Factors that could cause actual results to
differ from those contemplated by our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to,
the following:
|
§ |
|
difficulties we may encounter in connection with the recently completed sale and
disposition of our Nigeria assets and Nigeria based operations, including without limitation,
obtaining indemnification for any losses we may experience if claims are made against any
corporate parent guarantees we provided and which remained in place subsequent to the closing; |
|
|
§ |
|
the consequences we may encounter if our settlements in principle with the DOJ and the
SEC are finalized, including the imposition of civil or criminal fines, penalties,
disgorgement of profits, monitoring arrangements, or other sanctions that might be imposed as a result of government investigations; |
|
|
§ |
|
the consequences we may encounter if our settlements in principle with the DOJ and the
SEC are not finalized, including the loss of eligibility to bid for
and obtain U.S.
government contracts, and other civil and criminal sanctions which may exceed the current
amount we have estimated and reserved in connection with the settlements in principle; |
|
|
§ |
|
the commencement by foreign governmental authorities of investigations into the actions
of our current and former employees, and the determination that such actions constituted
violations of foreign law; |
|
|
§ |
|
the dishonesty of employees and/or other representatives or their refusal to abide by
applicable laws and our established policies and rules; |
|
|
§ |
|
adverse weather conditions not anticipated in bids and estimates; |
|
|
§ |
|
project cost overruns, unforeseen schedule delays, and the application of liquidated
damages; |
|
|
§ |
|
cancellation of projects, in whole or in part; |
|
|
§ |
|
failing to realize cost recoveries from projects completed or in progress within a
reasonable period after completion of the relevant project; |
|
|
§ |
|
inability to hire and retain sufficient skilled labor to execute our current work, our
work in backlog and future work we have not yet been awarded; |
|
|
§ |
|
inability to execute cost-reimbursable projects within the target cost, thus eroding
contract margin but not contract income on the project; |
|
|
§ |
|
curtailment of capital expenditures in the oil, gas and power industries; |
|
|
§ |
|
political or social circumstances impeding the progress of our work and increasing the
cost of performance; |
55
|
§ |
|
failure to obtain the timely award of one or more projects; |
|
|
§ |
|
inability to identify and acquire suitable acquisition targets on reasonable terms; |
|
|
§ |
|
inability to obtain adequate financing; |
|
|
§ |
|
inability to obtain sufficient surety bonds or letters of credit; |
|
|
§ |
|
loss of the services of key management personnel; |
|
|
§ |
|
the demand for energy moderating or diminishing; |
|
|
§ |
|
downturns in general economic, market or business conditions in our target markets; |
|
|
§ |
|
changes in the effective tax rate in countries where our work will be performed; |
|
|
§ |
|
changes in applicable laws or regulations, or changed interpretations thereof; |
|
|
§ |
|
changes in the scope of our expected insurance coverage; |
|
|
§ |
|
inability to manage insurable risk at an affordable cost; |
|
|
§ |
|
the occurrence of the risk factors listed elsewhere in this
Form 10-Q; and |
|
|
§ |
|
other factors, most of which are beyond our control. |
Consequently,
all of the forward-looking statements made in the this Form 10-Q are
qualified by these cautionary statements and there can be no
assurance that the actual results or developments we anticipate will
be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have
the consequences for, or effects on, our business or operations that
we anticipate today. We assume no obligation to update publicly any
such forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise. For a more complete
description of the circumstances surrounding the actions of our
current and former employees, see the Risk Factors included in
Part II. Other Information, Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Form 10-Q, beginning on
page 58.
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this Form 10-Q to Willbros, the
Company, we, us and our refer to Willbros Group, Inc., its consolidated subsidiaries and
their predecessors.
56
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our primary market risk is our exposure to changes in non-U.S. currency exchange rates. We
attempt to negotiate contracts which provide for payment in U.S. dollars, but we may be required to
take all or a portion of payment under a contract in another currency. To mitigate non-U.S.
currency exchange risk, we seek to match anticipated non-U.S. currency revenue with expenses in the
same currency whenever possible. To the extent, we are unable to match non-U.S. currency revenue
with expenses in the same currency, we may use forward contracts, options or other common hedging
techniques in the same non-U.S. currencies. We had no forward contracts or options at September
30, 2007 and 2006 or during the nine months then ended.
The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes payable and
accounts payable, and accrued liabilities shown in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
approximate fair value at September 30, 2007, due to the generally short maturities of these items.
At September 30, 2007, our investments were primarily in short-term dollar denominated bank
deposits with maturities of a few days, or in longer-term deposits where funds can be withdrawn on
demand without penalty. We have the ability and expect to hold our investments to maturity.
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our long-term
debt. At September 30, 2007, our only indebtedness subject to variable interest rates is certain
capital lease obligations.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without
limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal
executive and financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure
controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or
overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and
procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule
13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of September 30, 2007. Based on this evaluation, our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that, as
of September 30, 2007, the disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting them on a
timely basis to material information required to be included in our filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2007, there were no changes in our internal control
over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
57
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
For information regarding legal proceedings, see Item 3. Legal Proceedings of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, and Note 13 of our Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part I of this Form 10-Q, which information from
Note 13 as to legal proceedings is incorporated by reference herein.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The information presented below updates the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A of Part I in our
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and in Item 1A of Part II of our Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2007.
We may continue
to experience losses associated with our prior activities in
Nigeria.
In February 2007, we completed the sale of our Nigeria assets and
Nigeria based
operations. In August 2007, we and our subsidiary, Willbros
International Services (Nigeria) Limited, entered into a Global
Settlement Agreement with Ascot Offshore Nigeria Limited
(Ascot), the purchaser of our Nigerian assets and operations
and Berkeley Group Plc, the purchasers parent company.
Among the other matters, the Global Settlement Agreement
provided for the payment of an amount in full and final
settlement of all disputes between Ascot and us related to the
working capital adjustment to the closing purchase price under
the February 2007 share purchase agreement. In connection
with the Nigeria sale, we also entered into a
transition services agreement, and Ascot delivered a promissory
note in our favor.
The Global Settlement Agreement provided for a settlement in the
amount of $25.0 million, the amount by which we and Ascot
agreed to adjust the closing purchase price downward in respect
of working capital (the Settlement Amount). Under
the Global Settlement Agreement, we retained approximately
$9.3 million of the Settlement Amount and credited this
amount to the account of Ascot for amounts which were due to us
under the transition services agreement and promissory note. Our
payment of the balance of the Settlement Amount settled any and
all obligations and disputes between Ascot and us in relation to
the adjustment to the closing purchase price under the Share
Purchase Agreement.
As part consideration for the parties agreement on the
Settlement Amount, Ascot secured with non-Nigerian banks the
backstop of certain letters of credit totaling approximately
$20.3 million. In addition, upon the payment of the balance
of the Settlement Amount, all of the parties respective
rights and obligations under the indemnification provisions of
the share purchase agreement were terminated, except as provided
in the Global Settlement Agreement.
We may continue to experience losses or incur expenses
subsequent to the sale and disposition of our operations and the
Global Settlement Agreement. In particular:
|
|
Ø |
We issued parent company guarantees to our former clients in
connection with the performance of our Nigeria contracts.
Although the buyer will now be responsible for completing these
projects, our guarantees will remain in force
in varying degrees until the projects are completed. Indemnities
are in place pursuant to which the purchaser and its parent
company are obligated to indemnify us for any losses we incur on
these guarantees. However, we can provide no assurance that we
will be successful in enforcing our indemnity rights against the
purchaser. The guarantees include five projects under which we
estimate that, at December 31, 2006, there was aggregate
remaining contract revenue of approximately $374.8 million,
and aggregate cost to complete of approximately
$316.0 million. At December 31, 2006, we estimated
that only one of the contracts covered by the guarantees was in
a loss position and have accrued for such loss in the amount of
approximately $33.2 million on our December 31, 2006
balance sheet. If we are required
|
58
to resume operations in Nigeria under one or more of our
performance guarantees, and are unable to enforce our rights
under the indemnity agreement, we may experience losses. Those
losses could exceed the amount accrued at December 31,
2006, including losses that we could incur in completing
projects that were not considered to be in a loss position as of
December 31, 2006 due to additional expenses associated
with the
start-up and
redeployment of our equipment or personnel or a further
deterioration of the already challenging operating environment
in Nigeria.
|
|
Ø
|
Although our current activities in Nigeria are confined to
providing transition services to the new owner, we may find it
difficult to provide those services to the buyer if we
experience high levels of employee turnover or for other
reasons. If we are unable to provide adequate transition
services or if the buyer is otherwise unable to perform under
our contracts that were in effect as of the closing date, we may
be required to perform under our parent company guarantees
discussed above.
|
|
Ø
|
We may experience difficulty redeploying certain equipment to
our continuing operations that we previously leased for our
Nigeria projects and that was not conveyed to the buyer at
closing.
|
We have reached
agreements in principle with the DOJ and the SEC to settle
investigations involving possible violations of the FCPA and
possible violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If a final settlement is not
approved, our liquidity position and financial results could be
materially adversely affected.
In late December 2004, we learned that tax authorities in
Bolivia had charged our Bolivian subsidiary with failure to pay
taxes owed, filing improper tax returns and the falsification of
tax documents. As a result of our investigation, we determined
that J. Kenneth Tillery, then President of WII and the
individual principally responsible at that time for our
international operations outside of the United States and
Canada, was aware of the circumstances that led to the Bolivian
charges. Mr. Tillery resigned from the Company on
January 6, 2005. In January 2005, our Audit Committee
engaged independent outside legal counsel for the purpose of
conducting an investigation into the circumstances surrounding
the Bolivian tax assessment as well as other activities that
were previously under the control of Mr. Tillery. The
investigations conducted by the Audit Committee and senior
management have revealed information indicating that
Mr. Tillery, and others who directly or indirectly reported
to him, engaged in activities that were and are specifically
contrary to our established policies and possibly the laws
of several countries, including the United States. Our
investigations determined that some of the actions of
Mr. Tillery and other employees or consultants of WII or
its subsidiaries in connection with activities in Bolivia,
Ecuador and Nigeria may have caused us to violate
U.S. securities laws, including the FCPA,
and/or other
U.S. and foreign laws.
We have voluntarily reported the results of our investigations
to both the SEC and the DOJ. The SEC and the DOJ are each conducting their own
investigations of actions taken by us and our employees and
representatives that may constitute violations of U.S. law.
We are cooperating fully with all such investigations.
We have reached agreements in principle to settle the DOJ and
the SEC investigations. As a result of the agreements in
principle, we have established aggregate reserves relating to
these matters of $32.3 million. The aggregate reserves
reflect our estimate of the expected probable loss with respect
to these matters, assuming the settlement is finalized. Of the
$32.3 million in aggregate reserves, $22.0 million,
representing the anticipated DOJ fines, was recorded as an
operating expense for continuing operations and
$10.3 million, representing anticipated SEC disgorgement of
profits and pre-judgment interest, was recorded as an operating
expense for discontinued operations.
These settlements in principle are contingent upon the
parties agreement to the terms of final settlement
agreements and require final approval from the DOJ and the SEC
and confirmation by a federal district
59
court. We can provide no assurance that such approvals will be
obtained. If a final resolution is not concluded, we believe it
is probable that the DOJ and the SEC will seek criminal and civil
sanctions, respectively, against us as well as fines, penalties and
disgorgement. If ultimately imposed, or if agreed to by
settlement, such sanctions may exceed the current amount we have
estimated and reserved in connection with the settlements in
principle.
We have also voluntarily reported
certain potentially improper facilitation and export activities
to the United States Department of Treasurys Office of
Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), and to the DOJ and to
the SEC. With respect to OFACs investigation, OFAC and
Willbros USA, Inc. have agreed in principle to settle the
allegations pursuant to which we will pay a total of
$6.6 thousand as a
civil penalty.
The terms of
final settlements with the DOJ and SEC may negatively impact our
ongoing operations.
Upon completion of final settlements with the DOJ and SEC, the
Company and its subsidiary, WII,
expect to be subject to ongoing review and regulation of our
business operations, including the review of our operations and
compliance program by a government approved independent monitor.
The activities of the independent monitor will have a cost to us
and may cause a change in our processes and operations, the
outcome of which we are unable to predict. In addition, the
settlements may result in legal actions
against us in the countries that are the subject of the
settlements and by third-parties
alleging damages, including special,
indirect, derivative or consequential damages.
Under the settlements in principle with the DOJ and SEC, the
Company and its Subsidiary, WII,
expect to be subject to a three-year deferred prosecution
agreement and to be permanently enjoined by the federal district
court against any future violations of the federal securities
laws. Our failure to
comply with the terms of settlement agreements with the DOJ and
SEC could result in resumed prosecution and other regulatory
sanctions, and could otherwise negatively affect our operations. Our ability to
comply with the terms of the settlements is dependent on the
success of our ongoing compliance program, including:
|
|
Ø
|
our supervision, training and retention of competent employees;
|
|
Ø
|
the efforts of our employees to comply with applicable law and
our Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Compliance Manual and Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics; and
|
|
Ø
|
our continuing management of our agents and business partners.
|
60
Special risks
associated with doing business in highly corrupt environments
may adversely affect our business.
Although we have completed the sale of our Nigeria assets and
Nigeria based operations, our international business operations may continue to
include projects in countries where corruption is prevalent.
Since the anti-bribery restrictions of the FCPA make it illegal
for us to give anything of value to foreign officials in order
to obtain or retain any business or other advantage, we may be
subject to competitive disadvantages to the extent that our
competitors are able to secure business, licenses or other
preferential treatment by making payments to government
officials and others in positions of influence.
Our management
has concluded that we did not maintain effective internal
controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004. We believe that the material weaknesses reported
as of December 31, 2006 were eliminated in February 2007 as
a result of the sale of our Nigerian assets and operations.
However, our inability to remediate these material weaknesses
prior to February 2007, or any control deficiencies that we may
discover in the future, could adversely affect our ability to
report our financial condition and results of operations
accurately and on a timely basis. As a result, our business,
operating results and liquidity could be harmed.
As disclosed in our annual reports on
Form 10-K
for 2006, 2005 and 2004, managements assessment of our
internal controls over financial reporting identified several
material weaknesses. These material weaknesses led to the
restatement of our previously issued consolidated financial
statements for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 and the first three
quarters of 2004. Although we made progress in executing our
remediation plans during 2005 and 2006, including the
remediation of three material weaknesses, as of
December 31, 2006, management concluded that we did not
maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting
due to the following remaining material weaknesses in internal
controls:
|
|
Ø
|
Nigeria accounting: During the fourth quarter of 2006, we
determined that a material weakness in our internal controls
over financial reporting existed related to the Companys
management control environment over the accounting for our
Nigeria operations. This weakness in management control led to
the inability to adequately perform various control functions
including supervision over and consistency of: inventory
management; petty cash disbursements; accounts payable
disbursement approvals; account reconciliations; and review of
timekeeping records. This material weakness resulted primarily
from our inability to maintain a consistent and stable internal
control environment over our Nigeria operations in the fourth
quarter of 2006.
|
|
Ø
|
Nigeria project controlsestimate to complete: A material
weakness existed related to controls over the Nigeria project
reporting. This weakness existed throughout 2006 and is a
continuation of a material weakness reported in our 2005
Form 10-K.
The weakness primarily impacted one large Nigeria project with a
total contract value of approximately $165.0 million, for
which cost estimates were not updated timely in the fourth
quarter of 2006 due to insufficient measures being taken to
independently verify and update reliable cost estimates. This
material weakness specifically resulted in material changes to
revenue and cost of sales during the preparation of our year-end
financial statements by our accounting staff prior to their
issuance.
|
In 2006, our efforts to strengthen our control environment and
correct the material weakness in company level controls over the
financial statement close process included:
|
|
Ø |
reviewing and monitoring our accounting department structure and
organization, both in terms of size and expertise;
|
61
|
|
Ø
|
hiring additional senior accounting personnel at our corporate
administrative offices;
|
|
Ø
|
increasing our supervision of accounting personnel;
|
|
Ø
|
recruiting candidates in order to expeditiously fill vacancies
in our accounting, finance and project management
functions; and
|
|
Ø
|
developing documentation and consistent execution of controls
over our financial statement close process.
|
Our efforts during 2006 to improve our control environment in
response to the weakness in construction contract management
identified at December 31, 2005 included:
|
|
Ø
|
initiating efforts to expand operations and accounting
supervisory controls over consistency in the project reporting
process and documentation for Nigeria contracts through the
addition of supervisory personnel; and
|
|
Ø
|
developing more standardized documentation related to project
management reporting and management review processes.
|
We believe that our remaining material weaknesses were
eliminated in February 2007 upon the sale of our Nigeria assets
and operations since those material weaknesses related solely to
our operations in that country. However, our inability to
remediate these material weaknesses prior to February 2007, and
any other control deficiencies we identify in the future, could
adversely affect our ability to report our financial results on
a timely and accurate basis, which could result in a loss of
investor confidence in our financial reports or have a material
adverse effect on our ability to operate our business or access
sources of liquidity. Furthermore, because of the inherent
limitations of any system of internal control over financial
reporting, including the possibility of human error, the
circumvention or overriding of controls and fraud, even
effective internal controls may not prevent or detect all
misstatements.
Our business is
highly dependent upon the level of capital expenditures by oil,
gas and power companies on infrastructure.
Our revenue and cash flow are primarily dependent upon major
engineering and construction projects. The availability of these
types of projects is dependent upon the economic condition of
the oil, gas and power industries, specifically, the level of
capital expenditures of oil, gas and power companies on
infrastructure. Our failure to obtain major projects, the delay
in awards of major projects, the cancellation of major projects
or delays in completion of contracts are factors that could
result in the under-utilization of our resources, which would
have an adverse impact on our revenue and cash flow. There are
numerous factors beyond our control that influence the level of
capital expenditures of oil, gas and power companies, including:
|
|
Ø
|
current and projected oil, gas and power prices;
|
|
Ø
|
the demand for electricity;
|
|
Ø
|
the abilities of oil, gas and power companies to generate,
access and deploy capital;
|
|
Ø
|
exploration, production and transportation costs;
|
|
Ø
|
the discovery rate of new oil and gas reserves;
|
|
Ø
|
the sale and expiration dates of oil and gas leases and
concessions;
|
|
Ø
|
regulatory restraints on the rates that power companies may
charge their customers;
|
|
Ø
|
local and international political and economic conditions;
|
|
Ø
|
the ability or willingness of host country government entities
to fund their budgetary commitments; and
|
62
|
|
Ø |
technological advances.
|
If we are not
able to renegotiate our surety bond lines, our ability to
operate may be significantly restricted.
Our new bonding facility to provide surety bonds on a
case-by-case
basis for projects in North America requires that we post
backstop letters of credit for a percentage of each bond that is
acceptable to the insurer. We are currently negotiating with our
bonding company to eliminate the requirement to provide backstop
letters of credit, but we can provide no assurance that we will
be successful in removing this requirement. If we are unable to
obtain surety bonds, or if the cost of obtaining surety bonds is
prohibitive, our ability to bid some projects may be adversely
affected in the event other forms of performance guarantees such
as letters of credit or parent guarantees are deemed
insufficient or unacceptable. In addition, the requirement that
we post backstop letters of credit until such time as the bonded
projects are substantially completed reduces the amount of funds
available to us under our credit facility for other corporate
purposes.
Our international
operations are subject to political and economic risks of
developing countries.
Although we recently sold our operations in Nigeria and
Venezuela, we have substantial operations in the Middle East
(Oman) and anticipate that a significant portion of our contract
revenue will be derived from, and a significant portion of our
long-lived assets will be located in, developing countries.
Conducting operations in developing countries presents
significant commercial challenges for our business. A disruption
of activities, or loss of use of equipment or installations, at
any location in which we have significant assets or operations,
could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition
and results of operations. Accordingly, we are subject to risks
that ordinarily would not be expected to exist to the same
extent in the United States, Canada, Japan or Western Europe.
Some of these risks include:
|
|
Ø
|
civil uprisings, riots and war, which can make it impractical to
continue operations, adversely affect both budgets and schedules
and expose us to losses;
|
|
Ø
|
repatriating foreign currency received in excess of local
currency requirements and converting it into dollars or other
fungible currency;
|
|
Ø
|
exchange rate fluctuations, which can reduce the purchasing
power of local currencies and cause our costs to exceed our
budget, reducing our operating margin in the affected country;
|
|
Ø
|
expropriation of assets, by either a recognized or unrecognized
foreign government, which can disrupt our business activities
and create delays and corresponding losses;
|
|
Ø
|
availability of suitable personnel and equipment, which can be
affected by government policy, or changes in policy, which limit
the importation of skilled craftsmen or specialized equipment in
areas where local resources are insufficient;
|
|
Ø
|
government instability, which can cause investment in capital
projects by our potential customers to be withdrawn or delayed,
reducing or eliminating the viability of some markets for our
services;
|
|
Ø
|
decrees, laws, regulations, interpretations and court decisions
under legal systems, which are not always fully developed and
which may be retroactively applied and cause us to incur
unanticipated
and/or
unrecoverable costs as well as delays which may result in real
or opportunity costs; and
|
|
Ø
|
terrorist attacks such as those which occurred on
September 11, 2001 in the United States, which could impact
insurance rates, insurance coverages and the level of economic
activity, and produce instability in financial markets.
|
63
Our operations in developing countries may be adversely affected
in the event any governmental agencies in these countries
interpret laws, regulations or court decisions in a manner which
might be considered inconsistent or inequitable in the United
States, Canada, Japan or Western Europe. We may be subject to
unanticipated taxes, including income taxes, excise duties,
import taxes, export taxes, sales taxes or other governmental
assessments which could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations for any quarter or year.
These risks may result in a material adverse effect on our
results of operations.
We may be
adversely affected by a concentration of business in a
particular country.
Due to a limited number of major projects worldwide, we expect
to have a substantial portion of our resources dedicated to
projects located in a few countries. Therefore, our results of
operations are susceptible to adverse events beyond our control
that may occur in a particular country in which our business may
be concentrated at that time. Economic downturns in such
countries could also have an adverse impact on our operations.
Our backlog is
subject to unexpected adjustments and cancellations and is,
therefore, an uncertain indicator of our future
earnings.
We cannot guarantee that the revenue projected in our backlog
will be realized or profitable. Projects may remain in our
backlog for an extended period of time. In addition, project
cancellations or scope adjustments may occur, from time to time,
with respect to contracts reflected in our backlog and could
reduce the dollar amount of our backlog and the revenue and
profits that we actually earn. Many of our contracts have
termination for convenience provisions in them in some cases,
without any provision for penalties or lost profits. Therefore,
project terminations, suspensions or scope adjustments may occur
from time to time with respect to contracts in our backlog.
Finally, poor project or contract performance could also impact
our backlog and profits.
Our failure to
recover adequately on claims against project owners for payment
could have a material adverse effect on us.
We occasionally bring claims against project owners for
additional costs exceeding the contract price or for amounts not
included in the original contract price. These types of claims
occur due to matters such as owner-caused delays or changes from
the initial project scope, which result in additional costs,
both direct and indirect. Often, these claims can be the subject
of lengthy arbitration or litigation proceedings, and it is
often difficult to accurately predict when these claims will be
fully resolved. When these types of events occur and unresolved
claims are pending, we may invest significant working capital in
projects to cover cost overruns pending the resolution of the
relevant claims. A failure to promptly recover on these types of
claims could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity and
financial condition.
Our business is
dependent on a limited number of key clients.
We operate primarily in the oil, gas and power industries,
providing construction, engineering and facilities development
and operations services to a limited number of clients. Much of
our success depends on developing and maintaining relationships
with our major clients and obtaining a share of contracts from
these clients. The loss of any of our major clients could have a
material adverse effect on our operations.
64
Our use of
fixed-price contracts could adversely affect our operating
results.
A substantial portion of our projects is currently performed on
a fixed-price basis. Under a fixed-price contract, we agree on
the price that we will receive for the entire project, based
upon a defined scope, which includes specific assumptions and
project criteria. If our estimates of our own costs to complete
the project are below the actual costs that we may incur, our
margins will decrease, and we may incur a loss. The revenue,
cost and gross profit realized on a fixed-price contract will
often vary from the estimated amounts because of unforeseen
conditions or changes in job conditions and variations in labor
and equipment productivity over the term of the contract. If we
are unsuccessful in mitigating these risks, we may realize gross
profits that are different from those originally estimated and
incur reduced profitability or losses on projects. Depending on
the size of a project, these variations from estimated contract
performance could have a significant effect on our operating
results for any quarter or year. In general, turnkey contracts
to be performed on a fixed-price basis involve an increased risk
of significant variations. This is a result of the long-term
nature of these contracts and the inherent difficulties in
estimating costs and of the interrelationship of the integrated
services to be provided under these contracts, whereby
unanticipated costs or delays in performing part of the contract
can have compounding effects by increasing costs of performing
other parts of the contract.
Percentage-of-completion
method of accounting for contract revenue may result in material
adjustments that would adversely affect our operating
results.
We recognize contract revenue using the percentage-of-completion
method on long-term fixed price contracts. Under this method,
estimated contract revenue is accrued based generally on the
percentage that costs to date bear to total estimated costs,
taking into consideration physical completion. Estimated
contract losses are recognized in full when determined.
Accordingly, contract revenue and total cost estimates are
reviewed and revised periodically as the work progresses and as
change orders are approved, and adjustments based upon the
percentage-of-completion are reflected in contract revenue in
the period when these estimates are revised. These estimates are
based on managements reasonable assumptions and our
historical experience, and are only estimates. Variation of
actual results from these assumptions or our historical
experience could be material. To the extent that these
adjustments result in an increase, a reduction or an elimination
of previously reported contract revenue, we would recognize a
credit or a charge against current earnings, which could be
material.
Terrorist attacks
and war or risk of war may adversely affect our results of
operations, our ability to raise capital or secure insurance, or
our future growth.
The continued threat of terrorism and the impact of military and
other action, including U.S. military operations in Iraq,
will likely lead to continued volatility in prices for crude oil
and natural gas and could affect the markets for our operations.
In addition, future acts of terrorism could be directed against
companies operating both outside and inside the United States.
Further, the U.S. government has issued public warnings
that indicate that pipelines and other energy assets might be
specific targets of terrorist organizations. These developments
have subjected our operations to increased risks and, depending
on their ultimate magnitude, could have a material adverse
effect on our business.
Our operations
are subject to a number of operational risks.
Our business operations include pipeline construction,
fabrication, pipeline rehabilitation services and the operation
of heavy equipment. These operations involve a high degree of
operational risk. Natural disasters, adverse weather conditions,
collisions and operator error could cause personal injury or
loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property,
equipment and the environment, and suspension of operations. In
locations where we perform work with equipment that is owned by
others, our continued use of the equipment can be subject to
unexpected or arbitrary interruption or termination.
65
The occurrence of any of these events could result in work
stoppage, loss of revenue, casualty loss, increased costs and
significant liability to third parties.
The insurance protection we maintain may not be sufficient or
effective under all circumstances or against all hazards to
which we may be subject. An enforceable claim for which we are
not fully insured could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, we may
not be able to maintain adequate insurance in the future at
rates that we consider reasonable.
We may become
liable for the obligations of our joint ventures and our
subcontractors.
Some of our projects are performed through joint ventures with
other parties. In addition to the usual liability of contractors
for the completion of contracts and the warranty of our work,
where work is performed through a joint venture, we also have
potential liability for the work performed by our joint
ventures. In these projects, even if we satisfactorily complete
our project responsibilities within budget, we may incur
additional unforeseen costs due to the failure of our joint
ventures to perform or complete work in accordance with contract
specifications.
We act as prime contractor on a majority of the construction
projects we undertake. In our capacity as prime contractor and
when acting as a subcontractor, we perform most of the work on
our projects with our own resources and typically subcontract
only such specialized activities as hazardous waste removal,
nondestructive inspection, tank erection, catering and security.
However, with respect to EPC and other contracts, we may choose
to subcontract a substantial portion of the project. In the
construction industry, the prime contractor is normally
responsible for the performance of the entire contract,
including subcontract work. Thus, when acting as a prime
contractor, we are subject to the risk associated with the
failure of one or more subcontractors to perform as anticipated.
Governmental
regulations could adversely affect our business.
Many aspects of our operations are subject to governmental
regulations in the countries in which we operate, including
those relating to currency conversion and repatriation, taxation
of our earnings and earnings of our personnel, the increasing
requirement in some countries to make greater use of local
employees and suppliers, including, in some jurisdictions,
mandates that provide for greater local participation in the
ownership and control of certain local business assets. In
addition, we depend on the demand for our services from the oil,
gas and power industries, and, therefore, our business is
affected by changing taxes, price controls, and laws and
regulations relating to the oil, gas and power industries
generally. The adoption of laws and regulations by the countries
or the states in which we operate that are intended to curtail
exploration and development drilling for oil and gas or the
development of power generation facilities for economic and
other policy reasons, could adversely affect our operations by
limiting demand for our services.
Our operations are also subject to the risk of changes in laws
and policies which may impose restrictions on our business,
including trade restrictions, which could have a material
adverse effect on our operations. Other types of governmental
regulation which could, if enacted or implemented, adversely
affect our operations include:
|
|
Ø
|
expropriation or nationalization decrees;
|
|
Ø
|
confiscatory tax systems;
|
|
Ø
|
primary or secondary boycotts directed at specific countries or
companies;
|
|
Ø
|
embargoes;
|
|
Ø
|
extensive import restrictions or other trade barriers;
|
|
Ø
|
mandatory sourcing and local participation rules;
|
66
|
|
Ø
|
oil, gas or power price regulation; and
|
|
Ø
|
unrealistically high labor rate and fuel price regulation.
|
Our future operations and earnings may be adversely affected by
new legislation, new regulations or changes in, or new
interpretations of, existing regulations, and the impact of
these changes could be material.
Our strategic
plan relies in part on acquisitions to sustain our growth.
Acquisitions of other companies present certain risks and
uncertainties.
Our strategic plan involves growth through, among other things,
the acquisition of other companies. Such growth involves a
number of risks, including:
|
|
Ø
|
difficulties relating to combining previously separate
businesses;
|
|
Ø
|
diversion of managements attention from day-to-day
operations;
|
|
Ø
|
the assumption of liabilities of an acquired business, including
unforeseen liabilities;
|
|
Ø
|
failure to realize anticipated benefits, such as cost savings
and revenue enhancements;
|
|
Ø
|
potentially substantial transaction costs associated with
business combinations;
|
|
Ø
|
difficulties relating to assimilating the personnel, services
and systems of an acquired business and to integrating marketing
and other operational capabilities; and
|
|
Ø
|
difficulties in applying and integrating our system of internal
controls to an acquired business.
|
In addition, we cannot assure you that we will continue to
locate suitable acquisition targets or that we will be able to
consummate any such transactions on terms and conditions
acceptable to us. Acquisitions may bring us into businesses we
have not previously conducted and expose us to additional
business risks that are different than those we have
traditionally experienced.
Our operations
expose us to potential environmental liabilities.
Our US operations are subject to numerous environmental
protection laws and regulations which are complex and stringent.
We regularly perform work in and around sensitive environmental
areas, such as rivers, lakes and wetlands. Significant fines and
penalties may be imposed for non-compliance with environmental
laws and regulations, and some environmental laws provide for
joint and several strict liability for remediation of releases
of hazardous substances, rendering a person liable for
environmental damage, without regard to negligence or fault on
the part of such person. In addition to potential liabilities
that may be incurred in satisfying these requirements, we may be
subject to claims alleging personal injury or property damage as
a result of alleged exposure to hazardous substances. These laws
and regulations may expose us to liability arising out of the
conduct of operations or conditions caused by others, or for our
acts which were in compliance with all applicable laws at the
time these acts were performed.
We own and operate several properties in the United States that
have been used for a number of years for the storage and
maintenance of equipment and upon which hydrocarbons or other
wastes may have been disposed or released. Any release of
substances by us or by third parties who previously operated on
these properties may be subject to the Comprehensive
Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act
(CERCLA), the Resource Compensation and Recovery Act
(RCRA), and analogous state laws. CERCLA imposes
joint and several liability, without regard to fault or the
legality of the original conduct, on certain classes of persons
who are considered to be responsible for the release of
hazardous substances into the environment, while RCRA governs
the generation, storage, transfer and disposal of hazardous
wastes. Under such laws, we could be required to remove or
remediate previously
67
disposed wastes and clean up contaminated property. This could
have a significant impact on our future results.
Our operations outside of the United States are oftentimes
potentially subject to similar governmental controls and
restrictions relating to the environment.
Our ability to
increase our revenues and operating profits is partly dependent
on our ability to secure additional specialized pipeline
construction equipment, either through lease or purchase. The
availability of such equipment in the current market is highly
limited.
Due to the substantial increase in investment in energy-related
infrastructure, particularly hydrocarbon transportation, our
industry is currently experiencing shortages in the availability
of certain specialized equipment essential to the construction
of large diameter pipelines. We expect that these shortages will
persist or even worsen. If we are unsuccessful in obtaining
essential construction equipment on reasonable terms, our growth
may be curtailed.
Our industry is
highly competitive, which could impede our growth.
We operate in a highly competitive environment. A substantial
number of the major projects that we pursue are awarded based on
bid proposals. We compete for these projects against
government-owned or supported companies and other companies that
have substantially greater financial and other resources than we
do. In some markets, there is competition from national and
regional firms against which we may not be able to compete on
price. Our growth may be impacted to the extent that we are
unable to successfully bid against these companies.
Our operating
results could be adversely affected if our
non-US
operations became taxable in the United States.
If any income earned, currently or historically, by Willbros
Group, Inc. or its
non-US subsidiaries
from operations outside the United States constituted income
effectively connected with a US trade or business, and as a
result became taxable in the United States, our consolidated
operating results could be materially and adversely affected.
We are dependent
upon the services of our executive management.
Our success depends heavily on the continued services of our
executive management. Our management team is the nexus of our
operational experience and customer relationships. Our ability
to manage business risk and satisfy the expectations of our
clients, stockholders and other stakeholders is dependent upon
the collective experience and relationships of our management
team. In addition, we do not maintain key man life insurance for
these individuals. The loss or interruption of services provided
by one or more of our senior officers could adversely affect our
results of operations.
68
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table provides information about purchases of our common stock by us during the
quarter ended September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
|
Dollar Value) of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of |
|
|
Shares That May |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publicly |
|
|
Yet Be |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Announced |
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Plans or |
|
|
Under the Plans |
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
or Programs |
|
July 1, 2007 July 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1, 2007 August 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 1, 2007 September 30, 2007 |
|
|
269 |
(1) |
|
|
33.86 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
269 |
|
|
$ |
33.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Shares of common stock acquired from certain of our officers and key employees
under the share withholding provisions of our 1996 Stock Plan for the payment of taxes
associated with the vesting of shares of restricted stock granted under such plan. |
|
(2) |
|
The price paid per common share represents the closing sales price of a share of
our common stock, as reported in the New York Stock Exchange composite transactions, on the
day that the stock was acquired by us. |
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable.
69
Item 5. Other Information
On October 31, 2007, we entered into a definitive agreement for the purchase of all of the
issued and outstanding equity interests of Integrated Service Company LLC. For additional
information, see Note 15. Subsequent Events-Acquisition of our Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part I of this Form 10-Q, which information from Note 15 is
incorporated by reference herein.
Item 6. Exhibits
The following documents are included as exhibits to this Form 10-Q. Those exhibits below
incorporated by reference herein are indicated as such by the information supplied in the
parenthetical thereafter. If no parenthetical appears after an exhibit, such exhibit is filed
herewith.
|
10.1 |
|
Global Settlement Agreement dated as of August 15, 2007, among Ascot Offshore Nigeria
Limited, Willbros Group, Inc., Willbros International Services (Nigeria) Limited and
Berkeley Group PLC. |
|
|
10.2 |
|
Agreement to Terminate Consulting Services Agreement dated as of September 11, 2007,
between Willbros USA, Inc. and Michael F. Curran. |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
70
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
|
|
Date: October 31, 2007 |
By: |
/s/ Van A. Welch
|
|
|
Van A. Welch |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
71