Use these links to rapidly review the document
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2
CONTENTS
CONTENTS
INDEX TO CANO PETROLEUM, INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS 6
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

Filed by the Registrant þ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

þ

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

 

Definitive Additional Materials

o

 

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

 

Cano Petroleum, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

þ

 

No fee required.

o

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
    (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
        
 
    (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
        
 
    (5)   Total fee paid:
        
 

o

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        
 
    (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
        
 
    (3)   Filing Party:
        
 
    (4)   Date Filed:
        
 

Table of Contents

GRAPHIC   GRAPHIC


MERGER PROPOSED—YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT

        Resaca Exploitation, Inc., which we refer to as Resaca, its wholly-owned subsidiary, Resaca Acquisition Sub, Inc., which we refer to as Merger Sub, and Cano Petroleum, Inc., which we refer to as Cano, have entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated September 29, 2009, which we refer to as the merger agreement. Under the merger agreement, Resaca will acquire Cano through a merger of Merger Sub with and into Cano, which we refer to as the merger. Following the merger, Cano will be the surviving corporation and will continue as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resaca. The merger agreement is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement/prospectus, which we refer to as the proxy statement.

        At the effective time of the merger and assuming the Resaca shareholder approval of an amendment to Resaca's certificate of formation to effect a reverse split of the outstanding shares of Resaca common stock, par value $0.01 per share, which we refer to as Resaca common stock, by a ratio of one-for-five immediately prior to the merger, which we refer to as the Reverse Stock Split, each outstanding share of Cano common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, which we refer to as Cano common stock, will be converted into the right to receive 0.42 shares of Resaca common stock and each outstanding share of Cano Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, no par value per share, which we refer to as Cano preferred stock, will be converted into the right to receive one share of a newly designated class of Resaca Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, which we refer to as Resaca preferred stock, each as described under "Description of Resaca Capital Stock" in this proxy statement. Immediately following the merger and prior to completion of the offering (as defined below), Cano common stockholders will hold approximately 50% of the common stock of the combined company, and Resaca shareholders will hold approximately 50% of the common stock of the combined company.

        Resaca common stock is listed on the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange, which we refer to as the AIM, under the symbols "RSOX" and "RSX." Resaca common stock has been approved for listing on the NYSE Amex under the symbol "RSOX." Upon the consummation of the merger and the concurrent equity offering, Resaca common stock will be traded on the NYSE Amex and the AIM under the symbol "RSOX." Cano common stock is currently listed on the NYSE Amex under the symbol "CFW."

        This proxy statement describes the merger agreement, the merger and the transactions related to the merger in detail and provides information concerning the special meeting of Cano stockholders. The completion of the merger is conditioned upon (i) Resaca's shareholders approving the issuance of shares of Resaca common stock and Resaca preferred stock to the Cano common stockholders and preferred stockholders, respectively, in the merger; (ii) Resaca's shareholders approving the issuance of up to $75 million in Resaca common stock (which amount may be increased or decreased in the sole discretion of the Resaca board of directors in accordance with the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder) in an underwritten public offering, which we refer to as the offering; (iii) Resaca's shareholders approving the Reverse Stock Split; (iv) Resaca's shareholders approving an amendment to the Resaca Exploitation, Inc. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the Incentive Plan, to increase the number of shares of Resaca common stock reserved for issuance under the Incentive Plan by 4,000,000 shares and to prohibit the repricing of any award granted under the Incentive Plan; (v) Cano's common and preferred stockholders adopting the merger agreement; and (vi) Cano's common and preferred stockholders approving the amendment of Cano's certificate of incorporation by amending its Certificate of Designations, Rights and Preferences of the Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, dated August 31,


Table of Contents


2006, which we refer to as the Cano Series D Amendment. The Cano Series D Amendment is attached as Annex D to this proxy statement.

        The board of directors of Cano unanimously recommends that its stockholders vote "FOR" the proposals before them.

        Your vote is very important.    Whether or not you plan to attend Cano's special meeting, please take the time to vote by completing and mailing the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction card, or, if the option is available to you, by granting your proxy electronically over the Internet or by telephone.

        This document is a prospectus relating to the shares of Resaca common stock to be issued in the merger and a proxy statement for Cano to solicit proxies for its special meeting of stockholders. It contains answers to frequently asked questions and a summary of the important terms of the merger, the merger agreement and related transactions, followed by a more detailed discussion.

        For a discussion of certain significant matters that you should consider before voting on the proposed transaction, see "Risk Factors" beginning on page I-54.

Sincerely,    

GRAPHIC

 

GRAPHIC

J.P. Bryan
Chairman of the Board
Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

 

S. Jeffrey Johnson
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Cano Petroleum, Inc.

        Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission, which we refer to as the SEC, nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the transactions described in this proxy statement or the securities to be issued pursuant to the merger or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of the disclosure in this proxy statement. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

        This proxy statement is dated June 2, 2010 and is first being mailed to stockholders of Cano on or about June 2, 2010.


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.
801 Cherry Street, Suite 3200
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
(817) 698-0900


NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON JUNE 23, 2010

To the Stockholders of Cano Petroleum, Inc.:

        NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting of stockholders of Cano Petroleum, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which we refer to as Cano, will be held at The Fort Worth Club, located at 306 W. 7th Street, Suite 1100, Fort Worth, Texas 76102, on Wednesday, June 23, 2010 at 10:00 a.m., Fort Worth, Texas time, for the following purposes:

        Only stockholders of record of Cano common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, which we refer to as Cano common stock, and Cano Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, no par value per share, which we refer to as Cano preferred stock, at the close of business on May 21, 2010, which we refer to as the Cano record date, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the special meeting or at any adjournments or postponements thereof. Each share of Cano common stock is entitled to one vote per share. Each share of Cano preferred stock is entitled to (i) one vote per share for proposals 1 and 2; and (ii) approximately 173.913 votes per share (voting on an as-converted basis to Cano common stock) on proposal 3.

        As of April 5, 2010, the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Cano preferred stock had executed and delivered voting agreements, with irrevocable proxies, agreeing to vote in favor of the Cano Series D Amendment and the merger agreement and executed a written consent in lieu of special meeting, whereby those holders approved the Cano Series D Amendment and the adoption of the merger agreement.

        The first two proposals listed above relating to the merger and the Cano Series D Amendment are conditioned upon each other and the approval of each such proposal is required for completion of the merger.

        The affirmative vote of both (a) a majority of the outstanding shares of Cano common stock, voting as a separate class; and (b) a majority of the outstanding shares of Cano preferred stock, voting as a separate class, is required to approve the merger agreement and the Cano Series D Amendment. The approval of the adjournment of the meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of proposals 1 or 2 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares cast affirmatively or negatively of Cano common stock and Cano preferred stock, voting as a single class with the Cano preferred stock voting on an as-converted basis to Cano common stock.


Table of Contents

        A complete list of Cano stockholders entitled to vote at the special meeting will be available for examination at Cano's offices in Fort Worth, Texas during normal business hours by any Cano stockholder for any purpose relevant to the special meeting for a period of ten days prior to the special meeting. This list will also be available at the special meeting and any Cano stockholder may inspect it for any purpose relevant to the special meeting.

        The members of the Cano board of directors, who voted, unanimously approved and adopted the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by it, declared its advisability, and recommend that the Cano stockholders vote "FOR" the adoption of the merger agreement, "FOR" the adoption of the Cano Series D Amendment and "FOR" the approval of proposal 3 above. As described on pages I-108 to I-109, some Cano directors and executive officers will receive substantial financial benefits as well as other valuable consideration as a result of the merger.

        Your vote is important.    Even if you plan to attend the special meeting in person, we request that you sign and return the enclosed proxy or voting instruction card and thus ensure that your shares will be represented at the special meeting if you are unable to attend. If you do attend the special meeting and wish to vote in person, you may withdraw your proxy and vote in person.

    By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

 

GRAPHIC

 

 

S. Jeffrey Johnson
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

June 2, 2010


Table of Contents


Table of Contents

REFERENCES IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT

  v

CHAPTER I—THE MERGER

 
I-1
 

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE CANO SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

 
I-1
   

GENERAL

  I-1
   

INFORMATION REGARDING RESACA'S ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

  I-8
 

SUMMARY

 
I-12
   

THE PARTIES

  I-12
   

THE MERGER OF RESACA AND CANO

  I-13
   

THE COMBINED COMPANY

  I-13
   

COMBINED PRODUCTION AND RESERVE DATA

  I-14
   

OUR PROPERTIES

  I-17
   

THE MERGER AGREEMENT

  I-18
   

FINANCIAL ADVISORS

  I-19
   

INTERESTS OF CANO DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS IN THE MERGER

  I-20
   

MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER

  I-20
   

ACCOUNTING TREATMENT OF THE MERGER

  I-21
   

APPRAISAL RIGHTS

  I-21
   

RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE MERGER

  I-21
   

MATERIAL DIFFERENCES IN THE RIGHTS OF CANO STOCKHOLDERS AND RESACA SHAREHOLDERS

  I-21
   

CONDITIONS TO COMPLETION OF THE MERGER

  I-22
   

TIMING OF THE MERGER

  I-23
   

NO SOLICITATION OF OTHER OFFERS

  I-23
   

TERMINATION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT

  I-23
   

TERMINATION FEES

  I-24
   

THE MEETINGS—MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED

  I-24
   

RECORD DATES; SHARE OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

  I-25
   

VOTES REQUIRED

  I-25
   

QUORUM AND ABSTENTIONS

  I-26
   

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

  I-27
   

CONTACT INFORMATION OF THE COMBINED COMPANY

  I-29
   

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

  I-29
 

SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF RESACA

 
I-30
 

SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF CANO

 
I-32
 

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL DATA

 
I-34
 

PRO FORMA COMBINED SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)

 
I-41
 

SUMMARY OIL AND GAS DATA

 
I-43
 

COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA (UNAUDITED)

 
I-48
 

COMPARATIVE PER SHARE MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION

 
I-50

i


Table of Contents

 

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

  I-52
 

RISK FACTORS

 
I-54
   

RISKS RELATING TO THE MERGER

  I-54
   

RISKS RELATING TO THE COMBINED COMPANY AFTER THE MERGER

  I-59
   

RISKS RELATING TO THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY

  I-73
   

RISKS RELATED TO OWNERSHIP OF OUR COMMON STOCK

  I-78
 

THE MERGER

 
I-81
   

GENERAL

  I-81
   

BACKGROUND OF THE MERGER

  I-81
   

RESACA'S REASONS FOR THE MERGER AND THE SHARE ISSUANCES

  I-87
   

RECOMMENDATION OF THE RESACA BOARD OF DIRECTORS

  I-90
   

CANO'S REASONS FOR THE MERGER

  I-90
   

RECOMMENDATION OF THE CANO BOARD OF DIRECTORS

  I-93
   

ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL ADVISOR TO THE RESACA BOARD OF DIRECTORS

  I-93
   

OPINION OF CANO'S FINANCIAL ADVISOR

  I-94
   

ACCOUNTING TREATMENT

  I-107
   

OPINION AS TO MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER

  I-107
   

INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE MERGER

  I-107
   

APPRAISAL RIGHTS

  I-109
   

CANO VOTING AGREEMENTS

  I-113
   

INVESTORS RIGHTS AGREEMENT WITH HOLDERS OF RESACA PREFERRED STOCK

  I-113
   

NYSE AMEX LISTING OF RESACA COMMON STOCK; DELISTING AND DEREGISTRATION OF CANO COMMON STOCK

  I-115
 

MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER

 
I-116
 

THE MERGER AGREEMENT

 
I-120
   

GENERAL

  I-120
   

MANNER AND BASIS OF CONVERTING SECURITIES

  I-121
   

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

  I-122
   

CONDUCT OF BUSINESS PENDING THE MERGER

  I-123
   

CERTAIN ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS

  I-123
   

CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER

  I-124
   

TERMINATION

  I-126
   

TERMINATION FEES AND EXPENSES

  I-127
   

AMENDMENT; EXTENSION AND WAIVER

  I-128
 

THE COMPANIES

 
I-129
   

RESACA

  I-129
   

CANO

  I-129
   

MERGER SUB

  I-129
 

MANAGEMENT

 
I-130
   

CURRENT DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTOR NOMINEES

  I-130
   

COMMITTEES OF THE RESACA BOARD OF DIRECTORS

  I-136
   

DEALING CODE

  I-137
 

DESCRIPTION OF RESACA CAPITAL STOCK

 
I-138
   

RESACA COMMON STOCK

  I-138
   

RESACA PREFERRED STOCK

  I-138

ii


Table of Contents

   

ANTI-TAKEOVER LAW AND CERTAIN CHARTER AND BYLAW PROVISIONS

  I-143
   

LIMITATION OF LIABILITY; INDEMNIFICATION

  I-143
   

STOCK EXCHANGES

  I-144
   

TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR

  I-144
 

COMPARISON OF RIGHTS OF RESACA SHAREHOLDERS AND CANO STOCKHOLDERS

 
I-145
 

REVERSE STOCK SPLIT

 
I-163
   

PURPOSE

  I-163
   

PRINCIPAL EFFECTS OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT

  I-163
   

EFFECT ON AUTHORIZED SHARES

  I-164
   

POTENTIAL ANTI-TAKEOVER EFFECT

  I-164
   

EFFECT ON ACCOUNTING MATTERS

  I-164
   

NO DISSENTER'S RIGHTS

  I-164
   

FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT

  I-164
 

INCENTIVE PLAN AMENDMENT

 
I-166
   

DESCRIPTION OF THE INCENTIVE PLAN AMENDMENT

  I-166
   

DESCRIPTION OF AMENDED INCENTIVE PLAN

  I-167
   

FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES. 

  I-171

CHAPTER II—THE CANO SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

 
II-1
   

TIME AND PLACE

 
II-1
   

PURPOSE OF THE SPECIAL STOCKHOLDER MEETING

  II-1
   

RECORD DATE AND OUTSTANDING SHARES

  II-1
   

SHARE OWNERSHIP OF CANO DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND SIGNIFICANT STOCKHOLDERS

  II-2
   

QUORUM AND VOTE NECESSARY TO APPROVE PROPOSALS

  II-2
   

VOTING OF PROXIES

  II-2
   

REVOCATION OF PROXIES

  II-3
   

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

  II-3
 

CANO SPECIAL MEETING PROPOSALS

 
II-4
   

PROPOSAL 1: ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT

  II-4
   

PROPOSAL 2: CANO SERIES D AMENDMENT

  II-4
   

PROPOSAL 3: POSSIBLE MEETING ADJOURNMENT OR POSTPONEMENT

  II-7
 

FUTURE CANO STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

 
II-7
 

LEGAL MATTERS

 
II-7
 

EXPERTS

 
II-7
 

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

 
II-8

CHAPTER III—BUSINESS & FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF RESACA AND CANO

 
III-1
 

BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES

 
III-1
 

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF RESACA

 
III-27
 

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF CANO

 
III-66

iii


Table of Contents

CHAPTER IV—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF RESACA

  IV-1
 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

 
IV-13
 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 
IV-13
 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

 
IV-17
 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 
IV-17
 

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

 
IV-21
 

COMPARISON OF STOCKHOLDER RETURN

 
IV-23
 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

 
IV-24

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
F-1
 

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL DATA

 
F-2
 

NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
F-6
 

PRO FORMA COMBINED SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)

 
F-9
 

RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

 
F-11
 

RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009

 
F-38
 

CANO PETROLEUM, INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

 
F-59
 

CANO PETROLEUM, INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009

 
F-107

LIST OF ANNEXES

   

Annex A—Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended

 
A-1

Annex B—Opinion of RBC Capital Markets Corporation

 
B-1

Annex C—Proposed Charter Amendment for Reverse Stock Split

 
C-1

Annex D—Proposed Cano Series D Amendment

 
D-1

Annex E—Section 262 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware

 
E-1

Annex F—Investors Rights Agreement

 
F-1

Annex G—Glossary of Oil and Gas Terms

 
G-1

Annex H—Asset Transfer Agreement

 
H-1

Annex I—Resaca Exploitation, Inc. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (together with the First Amendment to Resaca Exploitation, Inc. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan)

 
I-1

Annex J—Second Amendment to Resaca Exploitation, Inc. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan

 
J-1

iv


Table of Contents


REFERENCES IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT

        The merger, the offering and refinancing of the combined company's indebtedness are conditioned upon the closing of each other. Therefore, we have combined a portion of the operational and reserve data and financial information to allow Cano stockholders to evaluate the meeting proposals as if the merger and related transactions are completed as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, which we refer to as the proxy statement. As used in this proxy statement, unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise indicates, all references to:

v


Table of Contents

        In addition, all discussions of Resaca outstanding shares, shares of restricted stock and options, pro forma for the merger with Cano, assume that (i) all Cano restricted stock is converted into Resaca common stock and (ii) all Cano stock options became Resaca stock options. Where indicated in this proxy statement, information in this proxy statement, including but not limited to share calculations and the exchange ratio in the merger, is presented as if the Resaca shareholders and/or the Cano stockholders have approved the following:

        Where indicated in this proxy statement, including as described with the terms "combined company" or "pro forma combined," pro forma combined financial information presented in this proxy statement gives effect to the completion of the merger and the Reverse Stock Split. For a complete description of the adjustments we have made to arrive at the pro forma combined financial measures that we present in this proxy statement, please read "Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Data" beginning on page F-2 of this proxy statement. Where indicated in this proxy statement, including as described with the terms "Resaca," "Cano," and "historical," separate and/or historical information of Resaca and Cano presented in this proxy statement gives no effect to the completion of the merger or the Reverse Stock Split.

vi


Table of Contents


CHAPTER I—THE MERGER

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE CANO SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

        Set forth below are commonly asked questions and answers about the merger and the Cano special meeting of stockholders. For a more complete description of the legal and other terms of the merger, please read carefully this entire proxy statement, including the annexes and the other documents referred to herein and the other available information referred to in "Where You Can Find More Information" on page II-8.


General

Q:
Why am I receiving these materials?

A:
We are sending you these materials to help you decide how to vote your shares of Cano stock with respect to our proposed merger.
Q:
Why are Resaca and Cano proposing the merger?

A:
Resaca and Cano believe that the merger will:

combine complementary assets and create balanced growth opportunities for the combined company;

result in significant cost savings and efficiencies for the combined company;

allow for near-term low risk production enhancement through increased productivity of the combined company;

provide strategic consistency to the combined company; and

create more efficient access to capital for the combined company.

I-1


Table of Contents

Q:
What will happen if the merger is completed?

A:
Resaca will acquire Cano through the merger of Merger Sub, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resaca, with and into Cano. Cano will be the entity surviving the merger and will continue as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resaca after the merger. Resaca will continue as a public company, and following the merger the combined company will be a domestic independent oil and gas company.

Q:
What will Cano stockholders and Resaca shareholders receive in the merger?

A:
In the merger, holders of Cano common stock will receive 0.42 shares of Resaca common stock for each share of Cano common stock outstanding. This exchange ratio is fixed and will not be adjusted to reflect stock price changes prior to the consummation of the merger. Immediately following completion of the merger, prior to the completion of the offering, Cano common stockholders will own approximately 50% of the common stock of the combined company.
Q:
When do Resaca and Cano expect to complete the merger?

A:
Resaca and Cano expect to complete the merger after all conditions to the merger as set forth in the merger agreement are satisfied or waived, including the shareholder and stockholder approvals required at the meetings of Resaca and Cano, respectively. Resaca and Cano currently expect to complete the merger by the end of June 2010. However, it is possible that factors outside of either company's control could require Resaca or Cano to complete the merger at a later time or not to complete it at all.

Q:
How does the board of directors of Cano recommend that I vote?

A:
The Cano board of directors unanimously recommends that holders of Cano common stock and Cano preferred stock vote "FOR" the proposals, including the adoption of the merger agreement and the Cano Series D Amendment.

Q:
What do I need to do now?

A:
After carefully reading and considering the information contained in this proxy statement, please vote your shares as soon as possible so that your shares will be represented at the Cano special meeting. Please follow the instructions set forth on the proxy card or on the voting instruction form provided by the record holder if your shares are held in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee.

Q:
How do I vote?

A:
You may vote before Cano's special meeting in one of the following ways:

use the U.S. toll-free number shown on your proxy card;

visit the website shown on your proxy card to vote via the Internet; or

I-2


Table of Contents

Q:
When and where is the Cano special meeting of stockholders to be held?

A:
The Cano special meeting of stockholders will take place on Wednesday, June 23, 2010 at 10:00 a.m., Fort Worth, Texas time. The location of the special meeting is The Fort Worth Club located at 306 W. 7th Street, Suite 1100, Fort Worth, Texas 76102.

Q:
What constitutes a quorum for Cano?

A:
Stockholders who hold a majority in voting power of the Cano common stock and Cano preferred stock issued and outstanding as of the close of business on the record date and who are entitled to vote must be present or represented by proxy in order to constitute a quorum to conduct business at the Cano special meeting.

Q:
What vote is required for Cano's approval relating to the merger?

A:
The affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of Cano common stock, voting as a separate class, and the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of Cano preferred stock, voting as a separate class, is required to adopt the merger agreement and the Cano Series D Amendment. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares cast affirmatively or negatively of Cano common stock and Cano preferred stock, voting as a single class with the Cano preferred stock voting on an as-converted basis to Cano common stock, is required to approve the Cano meeting adjournment proposal.
Q:
If my shares of Cano common stock are held in "street name" by my broker, bank or other nominee, will my broker, bank or other nominee vote my shares of Cano common stock for me?

A:
Unless you instruct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote your shares of Cano common stock, your shares will NOT be voted.

I-3


Table of Contents

Q:
What if I do not vote on the matters relating to the merger?

A:
If you are a Cano stockholder and you fail to vote or fail to instruct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote on the approval of the merger agreement, your failure to vote will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" the adoption of the merger agreement. If you respond with an "abstain" vote, your proxy will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" this proposal. If you respond but do not indicate how you want to vote on the adoption of the merger agreement, your proxy will be counted as a vote "FOR" the adoption of the merger agreement.
Q:
What if I hold shares of both Resaca and Cano?

A:
If you are a shareholder of Resaca and a stockholder of Cano, you will receive two separate packages of proxy materials. A vote as a Resaca shareholder for the Merger and the Share Issuances, the Reverse Stock Split or the Incentive Plan Amendment will not constitute a vote as a Cano stockholder for the adoption of the merger agreement or the Cano Series D Amendment, or vice versa. Therefore, please sign and return all proxy cards that you receive, whether from Resaca or Cano, or vote as a Cano stockholder by Internet or telephone.

Q:
May I change my vote after I have delivered my proxy or voting instruction card?

A:
Yes. You may change your vote at any time before your proxy is voted at the Cano special meeting. You can do this in one of four ways:

by sending a notice of revocation to the corporate secretary of Cano;

by sending a completed proxy card bearing a later date than your original proxy card;

by logging onto the Internet website specified on your proxy card in the same manner you would submit your proxy electronically or by calling the telephone number specified on your proxy card, in each case if you are eligible to do so and following the instructions on the proxy card; or

by attending the Cano special meeting and voting in person. Your attendance alone will not revoke your proxy.

I-4


Table of Contents

Q:
What are the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger?

A:
The merger is intended to qualify as a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which we refer to as the Internal Revenue Code, such that a U.S. Holder (as defined in "Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger" on page I-116) whose shares of Cano stock are exchanged in the merger solely for shares of Resaca stock will not recognize gain or loss, except with respect to cash received in lieu of fractional shares of Resaca stock. The merger is conditioned on the receipt of a legal opinion from tax counsel for Cano that the merger will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and that each of Cano and Resaca will be a party to the reorganization within the meaning of Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Q:
Is the consummation of the merger contingent on the approval of any party other than the shareholders of Resaca and the stockholders of Cano?

A:
In addition to Resaca shareholder and Cano stockholder approval, the consummation of the merger is contingent upon the following:

the approval and implementation of the Reverse Stock Split and the Incentive Plan Amendment;

the Resaca common stock to be issued in the merger having been approved for listing on the NYSE Amex, which approval was received by Resaca on March 30, 2010;

because the merger will constitute a reverse takeover under the AIM rules, Resaca common stock must be readmitted to trading on the AIM immediately following the merger. Following the Resaca annual meeting and the pricing of the offering on June 23, 2010, it is anticipated that trading of Resaca common stock on the AIM will be suspended until the completion of the merger and the closing of the offering. It is anticipated that Resaca common stock will be readmitted to the AIM and the suspension of trading lifted on June 30, 2010.

all indebtedness under Resaca's and Cano's credit facilities having been repaid or refinanced, or Resaca and Cano having received the consent of the lenders under such credit facilities to enter into the merger; and

the completion of the offering.
Q:
Am I entitled to appraisal rights?

A:
Cano's preferred stockholders are entitled to appraisal rights. Cano's common stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights. Resaca shareholders are also not entitled to appraisal rights.

Q:
Where will my shares be traded after the merger?

A:
Upon the consummation of the merger and the offering, Resaca common stock will be traded on the NYSE Amex and the AIM under the symbol "RSOX." Upon consummation of the merger,

I-5


Table of Contents

Q:
Who will be the directors of the combined company?

A:
If the merger occurs, the size of the combined company's board of directors will be increased from five to seven members. One of the current members of the Resaca board will resign, and three current members of the Cano board of directors will be nominated by Resaca's independent directors for election to the board of the combined company. As a result, following the merger, the combined company's board will consist of four individuals previously serving as Resaca directors and three individuals previously serving as Cano directors.

Q:
What if I hold Cano stock options, restricted stock or other stock-based awards?

A:
If the merger occurs, each Cano option will immediately vest prior thereto and become an option (a) to purchase that number of shares of Resaca common stock obtained by multiplying the number of shares of Cano common stock issuable upon the exercise of such option by the exchange ratio of 0.42, (b) at an exercise price per share equal to the per share exercise price of such option divided by the exchange ratio of 0.42, and (c) otherwise with the same terms and conditions as the outstanding Cano options. However, in any event the exercise price, the number of shares purchasable pursuant to the option and the terms and conditions of exercise of such option will be determined in accordance with the requirements of Section 424(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and in a manner that does not cause any option to be deferred compensation subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
Q:
What happens to Resaca stock options, restricted stock or other stock-based awards?

A:
Resaca stock options and other equity-based awards, including restricted stock, will remain outstanding and will not be affected by the merger.

Q:
Should I send in my stock certificates now?

A:
No. Please do not send your stock certificates with your proxy card.
Q:
Are there any risks in the merger that I should consider?

A:
Yes. There are risks associated with all business combinations, including the proposed merger. In particular, you should be aware that the exchange ratio determining the number of shares of Resaca common stock that Resaca will issue in exchange for shares of Cano common stock in the merger is fixed and will not change as the market prices of shares of Resaca common stock or Cano common stock fluctuate in the period before the merger. Accordingly, the value of the shares of Resaca common stock that Resaca will issue in the merger in exchange for shares of Cano common stock may be either less or more than the current trading price of shares of Cano common stock. There are also a number of other risks that are discussed in this proxy statement. We have described these risks and other risks in more detail under "Risk Factors" beginning on page I-54.

I-6


Table of Contents

Q:
Where can I find more information about the companies?

A:
Investors and security holders may obtain free copies of reports published by Resaca (when they are available) by contacting Resaca Investor Relations at (713) 753-1441. Investors and security holders also may obtain free copies of the documents on Resaca's website at www.resacaexploitation.com. The information contained on, connected to or that can be accessed via the website is not part of this proxy statement.
Q:
Who should I contact if I have any questions?

A:
If you have questions about the merger or if you need assistance in submitting your proxy or voting your shares or need additional copies of the proxy statement or the enclosed proxy card, you should contact:

Cano Petroleum, Inc.
801 Cherry St., Suite 3200
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
(817) 698-0900
  Or   D F King and Co., Inc.
48 Wall Street, 22nd Floor
New York, New York 10005
1-800-758-5378
Q:
How is the Series D Convertible Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations, Rights and Preferences amended or changed by the Cano Series D Amendment?

A:
The Cano Series D Amendment eliminates the rights of the holders of the Cano preferred stock arising out of or caused by the execution and delivery of the merger agreement or the consummation of the merger (including any rights to require Cano to redeem any of the shares of the Cano preferred stock or notice, voting or consent rights), except to receive the shares of Resaca preferred stock pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement and the rights set forth in the investors rights agreement attached as Annex F to this proxy statement (including registration rights and preemptive rights relating to the Resaca capital stock to be received by such holders pursuant to the merger), which we refer to as the investors rights agreement. If the Cano Series D Amendment is approved, and the merger is consummated, the holders of Cano preferred stock will have rights only to the consideration specified in the merger agreement and the rights under the investors rights agreement. For more information, please see "The Merger—Investors Rights Agreement with Holders of Resaca Preferred Stock" beginning on page I-113 and "The Merger Agreement—Manner and Basis of Converting Securities" beginning on page I-121.

Q:
What are the terms of the investors rights agreement?

A:
In connection with the issuance of the Resaca preferred stock to the current holders of the Cano preferred Stock, Resaca entered into the investors rights agreement with the holders of the Resaca

I-7


Table of Contents


Information regarding Resaca's annual meeting of shareholders

Q:
When will Resaca shareholders consider and vote upon the Merger and the Share Issuances, the Reverse Stock Split and the Incentive Plan Amendment?

A:
Resaca shareholders will consider and vote upon the Merger and the Share Issuances, the Reverse Stock Split and the Incentive Plan Amendment, as well as the Rig Acquisition and the election of directors, at its annual meeting of shareholders. The Resaca annual meeting of shareholders will take place on Wednesday, June 23, 2010 at 9:30 a.m., Houston, Texas time.

Q:
What constitutes a quorum at the Resaca annual meeting of shareholders?

A:
Shareholders who hold a majority in voting power of the Resaca common stock issued and outstanding as of the close of business on the record date and who are entitled to vote must be present or represented by proxy in order to constitute a quorum to conduct business at the Resaca annual meeting.

Q:
What vote is required for Resaca shareholder approval relating to the merger?

A:
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast, affirmatively or negatively, at the Resaca annual meeting at which a quorum representing a majority of all outstanding voting stock is present, either in person or by proxy, is required to approve the Merger and the Share Issuances, the Incentive Plan Amendment and the Resaca meeting adjournment proposal. The affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the outstanding shares of Resaca common stock entitled to vote on the approval of the Reverse Stock Split at the Resaca annual meeting at which a quorum representing a majority of all outstanding voting stock is present, either in person or by proxy, is required to approve the Reverse Stock Split. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast, affirmatively or negatively, at the Resaca annual meeting at which a quorum representing a majority of all outstanding voting stock is present, either in person or by proxy, excluding any votes cast by any Resaca shareholder qualifying as a related-party in relation to the Rig Acquisition, is required to approve the Rig Acquisition.

Q:
Other than the Merger and the Share Issuances, will other matters be considered at the Resaca annual meeting?

A:
Yes. In addition to voting on the merger-related matters previously described (i.e., the Merger and the Share Issuances), at Resaca's annual meeting, Resaca shareholders will be asked to consider and vote on the following additional matters:

to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the Reverse Stock Split;

to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the Incentive Plan Amendment;

to consider and vote upon a proposal to ratify the Rig Acquisition;

in the event the Merger and the Share Issuances, the Reverse Stock Split and the Incentive Plan Amendment are approved, to consider and vote upon a proposal to:

(i)
elect, and seat upon consummation of the Merger and the Share Issuances, William O. Powell, III as a Class I director to hold office until the 2012 annual meeting or until his successor is duly elected and qualified;

I-8


Table of Contents

Q:
What vote is required for Resaca shareholder approval of such other matters other than the Merger and the Share Issuances, the Reverse Stock Split and the Incentive Plan Amendment?

A:
The ratification of the Rig Acquisition requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast, affirmatively or negatively, at the Resaca annual meeting at which a quorum representing a majority of all outstanding voting stock is present, either in person or by proxy excluding any votes cast from any Resaca shareholder qualifying as a related-party in relation to the Rig Acquisition. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote of such proposal.
Q:
Why is Resaca proposing the Reverse Stock Split to its shareholders at its annual meeting?

A:
Resaca is proposing the Reverse Stock Split to increase the stock price for shares of Resaca common stock immediately prior to the merger so that the minimum listing requirements of the NYSE Amex can be satisfied. The NYSE Amex requires all new securities listing on its market to have a minimum market price of $2.00 per share. The effect of the Reverse Stock Split is to increase the stock price in the same proportion as the number of shares is adjusted downward, resulting in a five times increase in the stock price of Resaca common stock immediately prior to the merger. It is a condition precedent of the merger that Resaca common stock be listed on the NYSE Amex.

Q:
What is the principal effect of the Reverse Stock Split?

A:
If approved, the Reverse Stock Split would occur immediately prior to the merger for all Resaca common stock, and the ratio of post-split shares for pre-split shares would be the same for all of such shares of Resaca common stock. The Reverse Stock Split would affect all Resaca shareholders uniformly and would not affect any shareholder's percentage ownership interest in Resaca immediately prior to the merger. In addition, the Reverse Stock Split would not affect any Resaca

I-9


Table of Contents

Q:
Why is Resaca proposing the Incentive Plan Amendment to its shareholders at its annual meeting?

A:
Resaca is proposing the Incentive Plan Amendment, to be implemented simultaneously with the merger and after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split, in order to (i) reserve for issuance under the Incentive Plan an adequate number of shares of Resaca common stock to (a) implement the conversion of all outstanding Cano stock options into options to purchase Resaca common stock issued under the Incentive Plan; and (b) fund potential future awards under the Incentive Plan following the completion of the merger and (ii) to prohibit repricing of any awards granted under the Incentive Plan. The board of directors of Resaca believes that 4,000,000 additional shares of Resaca common stock, which number of shares has been adjusted for the Reverse Stock Split, represents a reasonable amount of potential equity dilution and allows the combined company to continue awarding stock options, restricted stock and other equity incentive awards, which are an important component of the combined company's overall compensation program. As of May 28, 2010 and assuming that the approval of the Reverse Stock Split occurred on May 28, 2010, only 563,715 shares of Resaca common stock would have been available for the issuance of awards under the Incentive Plan. Based on the closing price of Cano common stock of $1.11 and the closing price of Resaca common stock of $0.62 on May 28, 2010 and taking into consideration the need to convert Cano options into Resaca options in accordance with Section 424(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, approximately 473,678 shares of Resaca common stock must be available under the Incentive Plan for the conversion of the Cano stock options. Following the conversion of the Cano stock options and stock grants, and without the Incentive Plan Amendment, the Incentive Plan would only have 90,037 shares available for issuance. After the Incentive Plan Amendment is effective, 4,090,037 shares of Resaca common stock will be available for awards

I-10


Table of Contents

Q:
What assets did Resaca purchase in the Rig Acquisition?

A:
Resaca purchased (i) personal property consisting of workover rigs, reverse units/tank, power swivels, vehicles (trucks, trailers, construction equipment), shop equipment, and related equipment; (ii) books and files relating to such personal property and (iii) real property consisting of land, a building and a yard located at 2103 Maurice Road, Odessa, Texas, which we collectively refer to as the Rig Assets.

Q:
What consideration did Resaca pay for the Rig Assets?

A:
The purchase price for the Rig Assets was $1,593,720 ($1,604,995 value of the Rig Assets minus $11,275 for related taxes). Resaca issued 3,320,250 shares of Resaca common stock in exchange for the Rig Assets, which number of shares was determined by dividing the purchase price by $0.48 or £0.295 (which was the closing stock price on the AIM for Resaca common stock on July 6, 2009), after applying an exchange rate of $1.627 per British pound. At the request of the seller, PBWS, an affiliate of Resaca, the shares were issued to Torch E&P Company, a current shareholder of Resaca indirectly owned by its Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer.

Q:
Who are related-party shareholders in the Rig Acquisition?

A:
Torch E&P Company, J.P. Bryan, Resaca's Chairman of the Board, and John J. Lendrum, III, Resaca's Chief Executive Officer are related-party shareholders in the Rig Acquisition. These related-party shareholders have agreed to abstain from voting on the Rig Acquisition proposal at Resaca's annual meeting.

Q:
What are the terms of the offering?

A:
Resaca expects to offer between $50 million and $75 million in shares of Resaca common stock in an underwritten public offering (which amount includes the underwriters' 30 day option to purchase additional shares of Resaca common stock to cover overallotments, and which amount may be increased or decreased in the sole discretion of the Resaca board of directors in accordance with the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder). The actual amount of the offering may vary, based upon market conditions at the time.

Q:
What will the proceeds of the offering be used for?

A:
We intend to use the net proceeds of the offering to repay between $43 million and $67 million of existing indebtedness for the combined company, depending on the actual size of the offering. The remaining proceeds of the offering and the proceeds from any exercise of the underwriters' option to purchase additional shares will be retained as cash for future general corporate purposes, including severance and merger related expenses.

I-11


Table of Contents


SUMMARY

        This summary primarily highlights selected information contained in this proxy statement and does not contain all of the information that may be important to you. We encourage you to read this proxy statement in its entirety, as well as the annexes. We have included page references to direct you to the more complete descriptions of the topics presented in this summary that are contained in this proxy statement. We have defined certain oil and gas industry terms used in this document in the "Glossary of Oil and Gas Terms" attached as Annex G to this proxy statement.


The Parties

Resaca

        Resaca is an independent oil and gas exploitation company headquartered in Houston, Texas. The company was formed in the State of Texas in 2006 to exploit a number of oil and gas properties in the Permian Basin of the United States. Resaca was admitted to trading on the AIM on July 17, 2008. Resaca's activities in the energy industry are distinct from those of a traditional exploration and production company whose focus is on new, unproven reserves. Resaca exploits known, mature, proven and probable low-risk oil and gas reserves. Resaca utilizes the latest technology available to achieve secondary and tertiary hydrocarbon recovery. Resaca's activities are focused in the Permian Basin of West Texas and southeast New Mexico. Over the long term, however, Resaca will pursue attractive exploitation opportunities in other U.S. basins and in areas outside the United States.

        For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, Resaca had revenues of approximately $14.6 million (excluding gains and losses on price risk management activities) and net income of approximately $2.7 million. For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Resaca had revenues of approximately $11.3 million (excluding gains and losses on price risk management activities) and a net loss of approximately $6.7 million.

Cano

        Cano is an independent oil and natural gas company. Cano's strategy is to exploit its current undeveloped reserves and acquire, where economically prudent, assets suitable for enhanced oil recovery at a low cost. Cano intends to convert its proved undeveloped and/or non-proved reserves at its existing properties and properties Cano may acquire in the future into proved producing reserves by applying water, gas and/or chemical flooding and other techniques. Cano's assets are located onshore U.S. in Texas, New Mexico and Oklahoma.

        Cano was organized as a corporation under the laws of the State of Delaware in May 2003 as Huron Ventures, Inc. On May 28, 2004, Cano merged with Davenport Field Unit, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation, and certain other entities, which we refer to as the Davenport Merger. In connection with the Davenport Merger, Cano changed its name to Cano Petroleum, Inc. Prior to the Davenport Merger, Cano was inactive with no significant operations.

        For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, Cano had revenues of approximately $25.4 million and net income applicable to Cano common stock of approximately $7.9 million. For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano had revenues of approximately $16.4 million and net loss applicable to Cano common stock of approximately $13.1 million.

Merger Sub

        Merger Sub, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resaca, is a Delaware corporation formed on September 25, 2009, for the purpose of effecting the merger. Upon completion of the merger, Merger Sub will merge with and into Cano, and Cano will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resaca.

I-12


Table of Contents

        Merger Sub has not conducted any activities other than those incidental to its formation and the matters contemplated by the merger agreement.


The Merger of Resaca and Cano

        On September 29, 2009, Resaca and Cano entered into the merger agreement, pursuant to which Cano will merge with Merger Sub, a newly formed, wholly owned subsidiary of Resaca, with Cano thereupon becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of Resaca. In the merger, Cano common stockholders will receive 0.42 shares of Resaca common stock for each share of Cano common stock, and Cano preferred stockholders will receive one share of Resaca preferred stock for each share of Cano preferred stock. This exchange ratio is fixed and will not be adjusted to reflect stock price changes prior to the completion of the merger. Resaca shareholders will continue to own their existing shares, which will not be affected by the merger, except for dilution resulting from the issuance of Resaca common stock and Resaca preferred stock in conjunction with the merger.

        Due to Resaca's and Cano's complementary asset bases and similar strategic focus, we believe that the combined company will benefit from (i) balancing Resaca's near-term growth opportunities with Cano's longer-term development opportunities, (ii) capitalizing on significant cost savings and efficiencies through operational and administrative synergies in the range of $4.5 million to $5.0 million per year, (iii) increasing near-term production by the sharing of engineering expertise among Resaca and Cano management and staff, (iv) optimizing our larger and more diverse portfolio of combined assets, and (v) expanding our access to capital because of the combined company's increased size. For a more detailed description of the merger, please read "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Resaca—The Merger" beginning on page III-27 of this proxy statement.


The Combined Company

        At June 30, 2009, our estimated proved reserves had the following characteristics on a pro forma combined basis:

        Our estimated combined June 30, 2009 proved reserves of 63.3 MMBOE include 10.1 MMBOE of PDP, 8.0 MMBOE of PDNP, and 45.2 MMBOE of PUD. Reserves were estimated using New York Mercantile Exchange, which we refer to as NYMEX, crude oil and natural gas prices and production and development costs in effect on June 30, 2009. NYMEX crude oil price used in the estimation of Resaca's and Cano's reserves was $69.89 per barrel. NYMEX natural gas prices used in the estimation of Resaca's and Cano's reserves were $3.84 per MMBtu and $3.71 per MMBtu, respectively. The values reported may not necessarily reflect the fair market value of the reserves. For a more detailed description of the combined company's reserves, please read "Business and Properties—Combined Company Production, Estimated Proved Reserves and Acreage" beginning on page III-12 of this proxy statement.

        Our properties are contained in eight primary field complexes and a group of minor fields in mature oil and gas producing basins in Texas, New Mexico and Oklahoma and consist of approximately 75,000 gross and 73,000 net acres. At May 28, 2010, on a pro forma combined basis, we operated

I-13


Table of Contents


approximately 1,904 active wells, including 1,501 producing wells, 391 waterflood injection wells, and 12 salt water disposal wells. For the month ended April 30, 2010, on a pro forma combined basis, we produced an average of 1,923 net BOE per day from over 25 separate formations, which was composed of approximately 76% oil and approximately 24% natural gas. Nearly all of our production is from relatively shallow formations.

        Our exploitation plan involves the reactivation of shut-in wells, recompletion of currently producing wells, including refracturing, implementation of new waterfloods, reactivation and optimization of the existing waterfloods and an infill drilling program. We believe our properties contain many opportunities for the development of low risk oil and gas reserves and many of our properties are candidates for tertiary recovery by CO2 flooding based on reports and studies performed on these properties.

        For the year ended June 30, 2009, we generated pro forma combined operating revenues of $43.1 million and pro forma combined net income of $25.8 million. For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, we generated pro forma combined operating revenues of $28.7 million and pro forma combined net loss of $17.9 million.


Combined Production and Reserve Data

        The following table shows selected data concerning our combined production, estimated proved reserves and acreage for the periods indicated on a pro forma combined basis:

Field
  April 2010
Average
Daily
Production
(BOE)
  Total Est.
Proved
Reserves
MMBOE
(As of June 30,
2009)(1)
  Percent of
Total Est.
Proved Reserves
MMBOE
  PV-10 (As of
June 30,
2009)
(In Millions)(1)
  Gross
Acres
(As of
May 28,
2010)(2)
  Net
Acres
(As of
May 28,
2010)(3)
 

Texas Properties

                                     

Panhandle Properties

    563     28.9     45.7 % $ 323.9     20,387     20,387  

Penwell Properties

    155     1.7     2.7 %   19.8     3,120     3,120  

Desdemona Properties

    78     1.4     2.2 %   7.1     11,264     11,264  

Grand Clearfork Unit Properties

    46     0.5     0.8 %   4.6     1,120     1,120  

Other Minor Properties

    153     2.0     3.1 %   31.4     7,890     7,823  

New Mexico Properties

                                     

Cato Properties

    254     16.0     25.3 %   116.5     21,122     20,662  

Cooper Jal Unit Properties

    364     9.8     15.5 %   134.8     2,560     1,855  

Other Minor Properties

    7     0.2     0.3 %   2.6     320     240  

Oklahoma Properties

                                     

Nowata Properties

    223     1.5     2.4 %   13.9     4,594     4,594  

Davenport Properties

    80     1.3     2.0 %   9.9     2,178     2,178  
 

Total

    1,923     63.3     100.0 % $ 664.5     74,555     73,243  

(1)
PV-10 is a non-GAAP financial measure and generally differs from the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, the most directly comparable Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which we refer to as GAAP, financial measure, because it does not include the effects of income taxes on future net revenues. At June 30, 2009, our standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows was $418.2 million on a pro forma combined basis as shown below. Our estimated proved reserves and future net revenues, PV-10, and standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows were determined using end of the period prices for oil and natural gas that Resaca and Cano realized as of June 30, 2009, which were $69.89 per Bbl of oil and $3.84 per MMBtu of natural gas and $69.89 per Bbl of oil and $3.71 per MMBtu of natural gas, respectively.

I-14


Table of Contents

(in millions)
  Pro Forma as of
June 30,
2009
 

PV-10

  $ 664.5  
 

Less: Undiscounted income taxes

    (689.8 )
 

Plus: 10% discount factor

    443.5  
       

Discounted income taxes

    (246.3 )
       

Standard measure of discounted future net cash flows

  $ 418.2  
       
(2)
"Gross" acres refers to acreage in which we have a working interest.

(3)
"Net" acres refers to the aggregate of our percentage working interest in gross acreage before royalties or other payouts, as appropriate.

I-15


Table of Contents

Areas of Operations

GRAPHIC

Pro Forma Combined Assets as of June 30, 2009:
Proved Reserves of 63.3 MMBOE
PV-10 value of $664.5 million
80% crude oil (as measured by MMBOE)
Proved developed reserve life index of approximately 27 years
1,904 active operated wells (May 28, 2010)
75,000 gross acres, 73,000 net acres (May 28, 2010)

I-16


Table of Contents


Our Properties

        The following is a brief summary of the combined company's properties:

        Panhandle Properties.    The Panhandle Properties are located on 20,387 gross and net acres in Carson, Gray, Hutchinson and Roberts Counties, Texas and produce from the Brown, White and Arkosic Dolomite formations and the Granite Wash sandstone formation. Estimated proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 attributable to the Panhandle Properties were 28.9 MMBOE.

        Cato Properties.    The Cato Properties are located on 21,122 gross (20,662 net) acres in Chavez and Roosevelt Counties, New Mexico and produce from the San Andres formation. Estimated proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 attributable to the Cato Properties were 16.0 MMBOE.

        Cooper Jal Unit Properties.    The Cooper Jal Unit Properties are located on 2,560 gross (1,855 net) acres in Lea County, New Mexico and produce from the Yates, Seven Rivers and Queens formations. Estimated proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 attributable to Cooper Jal Unit Properties were 9.8 MMBOE.

        Penwell Properties.    The Penwell Properties are comprised of two units, the Jordan San Andres Unit (1,280 gross and net acres) and the Edwards Grayburg Unit (1,840 gross and net acres), located in Ector and Crane Counties, Texas and produce from the San Andres, Grayburg and Queen formations. Estimated proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 attributable to the Penwell Properties were 1.7 MMBOE.

        Nowata Properties.    The Nowata Properties are located on 4,594 gross and net acres in Nowata County, Oklahoma and produce from the Bartlesville Sandstone formation. Estimated proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 attributable to the Nowata Properties were 1.5 MMBOE.

        Desdemona Properties.    The Desdemona Properties are located on 11,264 gross and net acres in Erath, Comanche and Eastland Counties, Texas and produce from the Barnett Shale, Duke Sands, Strawn Sand and Marble Falls Lime formations. Estimated proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 attributable to the Desdemona Properties were 1.4 MMBOE.

        Davenport Properties.    The Davenport Properties are located on 2,178 gross and net acres in Lincoln County, Oklahoma and produce from the Prue Sand formation. Estimated proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 attributable to the Davenport Properties were 1.3 MMBOE.

        Grand Clearfork Unit Properties.    The Grand Clearfork Unit Properties are located on 1,120 gross and net acres in Pecos County, Texas and produce from both the Upper and Lower Clearfork formations at an average depth of approximately 2,500 feet. Estimated proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 attributable to Grand Clearfork Unit Properties were 0.5 MMBOE.

        Other Minor Properties.    These fields are located on 8,210 gross (8,063 net) acres in Winkler, Howard, Ector and Crane Counties in Texas and Eddy County, New Mexico and include the Kermit Complex, Iatan North, Kayser (Cowden South), McElroy and Cotton Draw/BTBN. Estimated proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 attributable to these properties were 2.1 MMBOE.

        For a more detailed description of the combined company's properties, please read "Chapter III—Business & Financial Information of Resaca and Cano—Business and Properties—Our Business and Properties" beginning on page III-1 of this proxy statement.

I-17


Table of Contents


The Merger Agreement

        A copy of the merger agreement is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement. We encourage you to read the entire merger agreement carefully because it is the principal document governing the merger. For more information on the merger agreement, see "The Merger Agreement" beginning on page I-120.

Structure of the Merger

        Pursuant to the merger agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into Cano, with Cano being the entity surviving the merger and becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resaca.

Consideration to be Received in the Merger by Cano Stockholders

        In the merger, each share of Cano common stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.42 shares of Resaca common stock, which we refer to as the exchange ratio. Immediately after the merger is completed, but immediately prior to the completion of the offering, Cano common stockholders will own approximately 50% of the common stock of the combined company, and the Resaca shareholders will own the remaining approximately 50%.

        Each outstanding share of Cano preferred stock will be similarly converted into the right to receive one share of Resaca preferred stock. For more information, please see "The Merger Agreement—Manner and Basis of Converting Securities" beginning on page I-121.

        Holders of Cano common stock will not receive any fractional Resaca shares in the merger. Instead, the total number of shares that each holder of Cano common stock will receive in the merger will be rounded down to the nearest whole number, and Resaca will pay cash for any resulting fractional share that a Cano stockholder otherwise would be entitled to receive. The amount of cash payable for a fractional share of Cano common stock will be determined by multiplying the fraction by the average closing price for Resaca common stock for the fifteen trading days immediately prior to the merger.

        The merger agreement provides for adjustments to the exchange ratio to reflect fully the effect of any stock dividend, subdivision, reclassification, recapitalization, split, combination or exchange of shares with respect to Cano preferred stock, Resaca common stock or Cano common stock with a record date prior to the merger. In this proxy statement, Resaca requests its shareholders to approve the Reverse Stock Split, to be affected immediately prior to the merger. The exchange ratio in the merger agreement prior to the effect of the Reverse Stock Split is 2.1 and following the effect of the Reverse Stock Split, assuming its approval by the Resaca shareholders at the annual meeting, the exchange ratio is 0.42. For a more complete description of the merger consideration, see "The Merger Agreement—Manner and Basis of Converting Securities" beginning on page I-121.

Treatment of Stock Options, Restricted Stock and Other Stock-based Awards

        Resaca stock options, restricted stock and other equity-based awards will remain outstanding and will not be affected by the merger.

        If the merger occurs, all outstanding Cano stock options will immediately vest prior thereto and be converted into options of Resaca issued under the Incentive Plan, and those options will entitle the holder to receive Resaca common stock. The number of shares issuable under those options, and the exercise prices for those options, will be adjusted based on the exchange ratio. However, in any event the exercise price, the number of shares purchasable pursuant to the option and the terms and conditions of exercise of such option will be determined in accordance with the requirements of Section 424(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and in a manner that does not cause any option to be deferred compensation subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. For a more complete

I-18


Table of Contents


discussion of the treatment of Cano options, please see "The Merger Agreement—Manner and Basis of Converting Securities" beginning on page I-121.

        Immediately prior to the completion of the merger, all restrictions on Cano restricted stock awards will expire and each outstanding share will be converted into the right to receive 0.42 shares of Resaca common stock at the effective time of the merger. For more information, please see "The Merger Agreement—Manner and Basis of Converting Securities" beginning on page I-121.

Directors and Executive Management Following the Merger

        The Resaca board of directors after the merger will be increased from five to seven directors. J.P. Bryan, Resaca's Chairman, will remain Chairman of the Board of the combined company and assume the role of Chief Executive Officer of the combined company. Richard Kelly Plato, a current Resaca director, is also standing for re-election, but will resign from Resaca's board of directors upon completion of the merger. Resaca's independent directors have nominated Donald W. Niemiec, William O. Powell, III and Garrett Smith, each of whom is currently a director of Cano, to serve on the Resaca board immediately after the merger. Judy Ley Allen, a current Resaca director, is also standing for re-election at the Resaca annual meeting of shareholders. As a result, following the merger, the combined company's board will consist of four individuals previously serving as Resaca directors and three individuals previously serving as Cano directors.

        Additionally, upon consummation of the merger, the following Resaca officers will resign: (i) Jay Lendrum, Chief Executive Officer, however, Mr. Lendrum will continue to serve as a director of the combined company and Vice Chairman of the Board; (ii) Mary Lou Fry, Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary; and (iii) Randy Ziebarth, Vice President—Operations. The following Cano officers will be appointed as officers of the combined company: (i) Phillip B. Feiner, Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary; and (ii) Michael Ricketts, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. In addition, Dennis Hammond will continue as the combined company's President and Chief Operating Officer. Chris Work will continue as Chief Financial Officer of the combined company and will also have the title of Senior Vice President.

        For a more complete discussion of the directors and management of the combined company, see "Management" beginning on page I-130.

Recommendations of the Cano Board of Directors

        After careful consideration, the Cano board of directors recommends that holders of Cano common stock and Cano preferred stock vote "FOR" the adoption of the merger agreement and the approval of the Cano Series D Amendment.

        For a more complete description of Cano's reasons for the merger and the recommendations of the Cano board of directors, see "The Merger—Cano's Reasons for the Merger" and "—Recommendation of the Cano Board of Directors" beginning on pages I-90 and I-93, respectively.


Financial Advisors

Resaca Financial Advisor

        Resaca's board of directors received the advice and considered the analyses of Madison Williams and Company (formerly known as SMH Capital Inc.), which we refer to as Madison Williams, in deciding to recommend the merger to its shareholders for approval.

I-19


Table of Contents

Cano Financial Advisor

        On September 29, 2009, RBC, Cano's financial advisor, rendered its oral opinion to the Cano board of directors, which opinion was subsequently confirmed in writing, that, based on RBC's experience as investment bankers, as of that date and subject to the various assumptions and limitations set forth in its opinion, the exchange ratio in the merger of 2.1 shares of Resaca common stock for each share of Cano common stock (which does not give effect to the Reverse Stock Split) is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Cano common stock. The full text of RBC's written opinion, which sets forth material information relating to such opinion, including the assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the scope of review undertaken by RBC, is attached as Annex B to this proxy statement. We urge you to read RBC's opinion carefully in its entirety. RBC's opinion was provided for the information and assistance of the Cano board of directors in connection with its consideration of the merger and was not on behalf of any other entity or person. RBC's opinion addressed solely the fairness of the exchange ratio, from a financial point of view, to the holders of shares of Cano common stock and did not in any way address other terms or conditions of the merger or the merger agreement. RBC expressed no opinion and made no recommendation to any stockholder of Cano or Resaca or any other person as to how such stockholder or other person should vote or act with respect to any matter related to the merger. For a more detailed discussion of RBC's opinion, please see "The Merger—Opinion of Cano's Financial Advisor" beginning on page I-94.

Interests of Cano Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger

        You should be aware that some of the directors and officers of Cano have interests in the merger that are different from, or are in addition to, the interests of Cano stockholders generally. These interests relate to the treatment of equity-based compensation awards held by directors and executive officers of Cano in the merger, the appointment of three existing Cano directors as directors of the combined company after the merger, separation arrangements covering certain of Cano's executive officers, and the indemnification of Cano's current directors and officers by Resaca for six years after the merger.

        As of the date of this proxy statement, except for existing Cano employment agreements with certain of its executive officers, there are no agreements with Resaca for the employment of any of Cano's directors or the continuing employment of any of Cano's executive officers. Other than as set forth above, the interests of Cano's directors and executive officers in the merger are limited to their interests as stockholders or option holders of Cano.

        Cano's directors and executive officers beneficially owned approximately 6.1% of the shares of Cano common stock and 3.6% of shares of Cano preferred stock as of the record date for the Cano annual meeting.

        For a further discussion of interests of Cano directors and executive officers in the merger, see "The Merger—Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger" beginning on page I-107.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger

        Resaca and Cano intend for the merger to qualify as a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. Accordingly, the merger is expected to be a tax-free transaction to the Cano stockholders to the extent the Cano common stockholders receive Resaca common stock and the Cano preferred stockholders receive Resaca preferred stock in the merger, except for cash received in lieu of fractional shares of Resaca common stock. It is a condition to each of Resaca's and Cano's respective obligations to complete the merger that Cano receive a legal opinion from tax counsel that the merger will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.

        For a more complete description of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger, see "Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger" beginning on page I-116.

I-20


Table of Contents

        The tax consequences of the merger to you may depend on your own situation. In addition, you may be subject to state, local or foreign tax laws that are not addressed in this proxy statement. You are urged to consult with your own tax advisor for a full understanding of the tax consequences of the merger to you.

Accounting Treatment of the Merger

        The merger will be accounted for as an acquisition by Resaca of Cano under the purchase method of accounting according to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. For a more detailed discussion of the accounting treatment of the merger, please see "The Merger—Accounting Treatment" on page I-107.

Appraisal Rights

        Under Section 262 of the DGCL, the holders of Cano preferred stock will have the right to seek appraisal of the fair value of their shares. However, the holders of Resaca common stock and the holders of Cano common stock do not have appraisal rights in connection with the merger. For a more detailed discussion of appraisal rights, please see "The Merger—Appraisal Rights" beginning on page I-109.


Risks Associated with the Merger

        In addition to the other information contained in this proxy statement, you should be aware of and carefully consider the risks relating to the merger described under "Risk Factors" beginning on page I-54 of this proxy statement in deciding whether to vote in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement and the Cano Series D Amendment.


Material Differences in the Rights of Cano Stockholders and Resaca Shareholders

        The rights of Cano stockholders are governed by the DGCL and Cano's amended certificate of incorporation, which we refer to as the Cano certificate of incorporation, and Cano's second amended and restated bylaws, which we refer to as the Cano bylaws and the Cano certificate of incorporation and the Cano bylaws are collectively referred to as the Cano charter documents. Upon completion of the merger, Cano stockholders who receive Resaca common stock or Resaca preferred stock will be shareholders of Resaca, and their rights will be governed by the Texas Business Organizations Code, which we refer to as the TBOC, and Resaca's certificate of formation, as amended, which we refer to as the Resaca certificate of formation, and Resaca's bylaws, which we refer to as the Resaca bylaws, and the Resaca certificate of formation and the Resaca bylaws we refer to collectively as the Resaca charter documents.

        The DGCL and the Cano charter documents differ from the TBOC and the Resaca charter documents in some material respects. One material difference is the required vote to approve a fundamental action, such as a charter amendment or merger. To approve a fundamental action, the TBOC requires an affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of Resaca common stock entitled to vote on the fundamental action. The DGCL requires a lesser vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of Cano common stock entitled to vote. The right to act by written consent also differs between Resaca shareholders and Cano stockholders. Cano stockholders are permitted to act by written consent in accordance with their bylaws, but Resaca shareholders are expressly prohibited from doing so under Resaca's certificate of formation.

        Similarly, there are some material differences in the rights of the holders of Resaca preferred stock and the Cano preferred stock. The conversion price of the Cano preferred stock is $5.75 per share. Following the merger, the conversion price of the Resaca preferred stock will be $4.963 per share, assuming the approval of the Reverse Stock Split. The anti-dilution adjustment feature of the conversion price of the Resaca preferred stock and the Cano preferred stock also differs. For the

I-21


Table of Contents


nine-month period following the initial issuance date, the conversion price of Resaca preferred stock will not be reduced for equity issued at a price greater than the market price of $3.971 per share as adjusted for the Reverse Stock Split. The conversion price of Cano preferred stock adjusts if equity issued is at a price less than the conversion price then in effect. For the nine-months following the completion of the merger, Resaca will not issue Resaca common stock for proceeds of more than $30 million at a gross per share price below $3.971 without prior consent of the holders of Resaca preferred stock and Cano preferred stock does not contain this restriction. The maturity date for the Resaca preferred stock will be October 6, 2012, a thirteen month extension from the maturity date set for the Cano preferred stock, which was September 6, 2011.

        For more information on these differences, see "Comparison of Rights of Resaca Shareholders and Cano Stockholders" beginning on page I-145.


Conditions to Completion of the Merger

        We expect to complete the merger after all the conditions to the merger in the merger agreement are satisfied or waived, including after we receive shareholder approval at the Resaca annual meeting and stockholder approval at the Cano special meeting and receive all required regulatory and third-party approvals. We currently expect to complete the merger by the end of June 2010. However, it is possible that factors outside of our control could require us to complete the merger at a later time or not to complete it at all.

        Each party's obligation to complete the merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of various conditions, including the following:

I-22


Table of Contents

        The merger agreement provides that any or all of these conditions may be waived, in whole or in part, by Resaca or Cano, to the extent legally allowed. Neither Resaca nor Cano currently expects to waive any material condition to the completion of the merger. If either Resaca or Cano determines to waive any condition to the merger that would result in a material and adverse change in the terms of the merger to Resaca shareholders or Cano stockholders (including any change in the tax consequences of the transaction to Cano stockholders), if the offering cannot be completed or if the indebtedness under Resaca's and Cano's credit facilities cannot be repaid or refinanced, proxies would be resolicited from the Resaca shareholders or Cano stockholders, as applicable.

        In addition, the merger, the offering and refinancing of the combined company's indebtedness are each conditioned upon the closing of the other. For a more complete discussion of the conditions to the merger, see "The Merger Agreement—Conditions to the Merger" beginning on page I-124.


Timing of the Merger

        The merger is expected to be completed by the end of June 2010, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of closing conditions. However, it is possible that factors outside of either company's control could require Resaca or Cano to complete the merger at a later time or not to complete it at all.


No Solicitation of Other Offers

        In the merger agreement, each of Resaca and Cano has agreed that it will not directly or indirectly:

The merger agreement does not, however, prohibit either party from considering a bona fide acquisition proposal from a third party if certain specified conditions are met. For a discussion of the prohibition on solicitation of acquisition proposals from third parties, see "The Merger Agreement—Certain Additional Provisions—Acquisition Proposals (No-Shop Provisions)" beginning on page I-124.

Termination of the Merger Agreement

        Generally, the merger agreement may be terminated and the merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the completion of the merger (including after Resaca shareholder or Cano stockholder approval). In addition, either party can unilaterally terminate the merger agreement in various circumstances, including the following:

I-23


Table of Contents

Termination Fees

        Upon the occurrence of certain termination events in connection with an offer or proposal regarding a business combination, Resaca or Cano may be required to pay the other a termination fee of $3.5 million.

        This termination fee could discourage other companies from seeking to acquire or merge with either Cano or Resaca. See "The Merger Agreement—Termination" and "—Termination Fees and Expenses" beginning on pages I-126 and I-127 respectively.

The Meetings—Matters to be Considered

Resaca Annual Meeting of Shareholders

        The Resaca annual meeting will take place on Wednesday, June 23, 2010 at 9:30 a.m., Houston, Texas time. The location of the annual meeting is Resaca's executive offices located at 1331 Lamar, Suite 1450, Houston, Texas 77010. Resaca's shareholders will be asked to vote on the following proposals:

I-24


Table of Contents

        The first three proposals listed above relating to the Merger and the Share Issuances, the Reverse Stock Split and the Incentive Plan Amendment are conditioned upon each other and the approval of each such proposal is required for completion of the merger.

        A separate proxy statement will be mailed to the Resaca shareholders on or about June 1, 2010.

Cano Special Meeting of Stockholders

        The Cano special meeting will take place on Wednesday, June 23, 2010 at 10:00 a.m., Fort Worth, Texas time. The location of the special meeting is The Fort Worth Club located at 306 W. 7th Street, Suite 1100, Fort Worth, Texas 76102. Cano's stockholders will be asked to vote on the following proposals:

        The Cano board of directors recommends that Cano stockholders vote "FOR" all of the proposals set forth above, as more fully described under "The Cano Special Meeting of Stockholders" beginning on page II-1.

Record Dates; Share Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

Resaca

        Resaca shareholders may vote at the Resaca annual meeting if they owned Resaca common stock at the close of business on May 21, 2010, the Resaca record date. As of the Resaca record date and prior to the effect of the Reverse Stock Split, directors and executive officers of Resaca and their affiliates owned and were entitled to vote 19,197,804 shares of Resaca common stock or approximately 19.8% of the total voting power of the shares of Resaca common stock outstanding on that date.

Cano

        You may vote at the special meeting of Cano stockholders if you owned Cano common stock or Cano preferred stock at the close of business on May 21, 2010, the Cano record date. As of the Cano record date, directors and executive officers of Cano and their affiliates owned and were entitled to vote 2,773,931 shares of Cano common stock, or approximately 6.1% of the shares of Cano common stock outstanding on that date, and 1,000 shares of Cano preferred stock, or approximately 3.6% of the shares of Cano preferred stock outstanding on that date.

Votes Required

Resaca

        Each share of Resaca common stock will be entitled to one vote at the Resaca annual meeting. At the Resaca annual meeting, assuming a quorum is present:

I-25


Table of Contents

Cano

        Each share of Cano common stock is entitled to one vote at the special meeting. Each share of Cano preferred stock is entitled to (i) one vote per share on the adoption of the merger agreement and the approval of the Cano Series D Amendment; and (ii) approximately 173.913 votes per share (voting on an as-converted basis to Cano common stock) on approval of the Cano meeting adjournment proposal and any other matters that may come before the Cano stockholders at the special meeting. At the Cano special meeting, assuming a quorum is present:

        As of April 5, 2010, the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Cano preferred stock had executed and delivered voting agreements, with irrevocable proxies, agreeing to vote in favor of the Cano Series D Amendment and the merger agreement and executed a written consent in lieu of special meeting, whereby those holders approved the Cano Series D Amendment and the adoption of the merger agreement.

Quorum and Abstentions

        A quorum must be present to conduct business at each of the meetings. This means that at the Resaca annual meeting, shareholders who hold a majority in voting power of the Resaca common stock issued and outstanding as of the close of business on the record date and who are entitled to vote must be present or represented by proxy in order to constitute a quorum to conduct business at the annual meeting. At the Cano special meeting, greater than 50% of the outstanding shares of Cano common stock and Cano preferred stock as of the Cano record date must be represented in person or by proxy.

        Abstentions and withhold votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote with respect to the Resaca proposals to (i) approve of the Merger and the Share Issuances and the Incentive Plan Amendment, (ii) ratify the Rig Acquisition or (iii) approve the election of directors to the board of Resaca. However, with respect to the proposal to approve the Reverse Stock Split, abstentions will have the same effect as voting "AGAINST" such proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as voting "AGAINST" each of the Cano proposals.

I-26


Table of Contents

        An abstention occurs when a stockholder abstains from voting (either in person or by proxy) on one or more of the proposals. A withhold vote occurs when a stockholder withholds its vote (either in person or by proxy) with respect to the election of a director or directors.

Recent Developments

Resignation of Patrick M. McKinney

        Patrick M. McKinney resigned from his position as Senior Vice President of Engineering and Operations of Cano effective as of May 11, 2010.

Amendment to the Merger Agreement

        On May 19, 2010, Resaca, Cano and Merger Sub entered into that certain Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, which we refer to as the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment revises certain representations and warranties and covenants of Resaca and Cano to account for the fact that a separate proxy statement (rather than a joint proxy statement) will be prepared for each of Resaca's annual meeting of shareholders and Cano's special meeting of its stockholders.

CIT Facility Waiver

        On May 14, 2010, Resaca received a waiver from its lenders under its senior credit facility, referred to herein as the CIT Facility, for failing to meet its minimum current ratio test as of March 31, 2010 and for the formation of the Merger Sub. The waiver with respect to the formation of Merger Sub will remain in effect until July 31, 2010. In addition, under the terms of the waiver, if Resaca does not repay or refinance the CIT Facility by June 30, 2010, it will cause all amounts owed to Torch, an affiliate of Resaca and its Chairman of the Board, at such time under the Services Agreement (as defined on page I-68 and as described on page IV-1) to be evidenced by a promissory note payable to Torch, which will be subordinated to the indebtedness Resaca owes under the CIT Facility on terms acceptable to its senior lenders.

Torch Subordination Letter Agreement

        Resaca entered into an agreement with Torch on May 14, 2010 which requires that on June 30, 2010, unless the CIT Facility has been repaid in full or refinanced, all amounts that Resaca owes to Torch at such time under the Services Agreement will be evidenced by a written promissory note payable to Torch. As of March 31, 2010, Resaca owes Torch $1,755,647 under the Services Agreement. Interest on such promissory note will accrue at the prime rate announced from time to time by Amegy Bank N.A. plus 2.0%, which is the same rate of interest that Torch may apply to all over due amounts under the terms of the Services Agreement. All principal and accrued interest on the promissory note will be due and payable at maturity on October 1, 2012 (or, if earlier, two business days after the CIT Facility is repaid from the proceeds of an issuance of Resaca equity or 91 days after the CIT Facility is refinanced or repaid with funds from any other sources). Such promissory note will also be subordinated to all amounts that Resaca owes under the CIT Facility.

Report on Combined Company Reserves as of December 31, 2009

        On March 24, 2010, Resaca received a reserve report on the combined proved reserves of Resaca and Cano as of December 31, 2009 from Haas Petroleum Engineering Services, Inc., which we refer to as Haas. As of December 31, 2009, the PV-10 value for the combined company is $773.5 million, which is an increase of $109.0 million or 16.4% higher than the PV-10 value computed at June 30, 2009 of $664.5 million. The $109.0 million increase is primarily attributable to higher commodity prices.

        These estimates do not include the effect of the SEC's revised oil and gas rules, "Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting," issued in December 2008, which is effective for annual reports on Forms 10-K for fiscal years ending on or after December 31, 2009. The revised SEC rules include changes to the

I-27


Table of Contents


pricing used to estimate reserves, the ability to include nontraditional resources in reserves, the use of new technology for determining reserves and permitted disclosure of probable and possible reserves. The estimated proved reserves, future net revenues and PV-10 presented at December 31, 2009 were determined using SEC rules in effect for fiscal years prior to December 31, 2009, including the use of end of the period prices for oil and natural gas as of December 31, 2009, which were $79.39 per barrel of oil and $5.82 per MMBtu of natural gas instead of an unweighted average 12-month price, calculated as the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12-month period ended December 31, 2009, of $61.18 per Bbl for oil and $3.87 per MMBtu for natural gas under the new SEC rules. Haas estimates that, had the combined company applied unweighted 12-month average pricing at December 31, 2009 under the SEC's revised rules, the combined company's proved reserves would have decreased by 1.7 MMBOE, which is a reduction of 3% as compared to proved reserves of 57.5 MMBOE using December 31, 2009 flat pricing. Haas estimates that utilizing the unweighted 12-month average pricing at December 31, 2009 would have reduced the PV-10 value of the combined company's proven reserves by $404.9 million or 52% as compared to PV-10 value of proved reserves of $773.5 million using December 31, 2009 flat pricing. Beginning June 30, 2010, the combined company will be required to prepare its reserve estimates using the definitions and pricing required by the SEC's revised rules.

Stock Exchange Listing

        On March 30, 2010, the combined company was approved for listing on the NYSE Amex upon notice of issuance.

New Bank Facility

        On April 26, 2010, we received a firm commitment for a new $200 million revolving senior secured credit facility with UBNA and Natixis. UBNA is the Administrative Agent and UBNA and Natixis are the Issuing Lenders of the New Facility. The New Facility will mature on July 1, 2012 and is expected to have an initial and current borrowing base of $90 million based upon our estimated proved reserves. The New Facility provides for an automatic extension to the third anniversary of the closing date of the New Facility if all shares of Resaca preferred stock convert to shares of Resaca common stock or the stated maturity date or redemption date for the Resaca preferred stock is extended to a date at least 91 days after the third anniversary of the closing date of the New Facility and no default then exists under the New Facility. Advances under the New Facility shall be in the form of either base rate loans or LIBOR loans. The interest rate on base rate loans shall be tied to the "UB Reference Rate" plus a margin of 1.5% to 2.25% based on the percentage of the borrowing base utilized at the time of the credit extension. The interest rate on LIBOR loans shall be LIBOR for a 30, 60, 90, or (if available) 180 day period plus a margin of 2.50% to 3.25% based on the percentage of the borrowing base utilized at the time of the credit extension. See "Chapter III—Business & Financial Information of Resaca and Cano—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Resaca—Our New Facility" on page III-54 for a detailed discussion of the New Facility and Exhibit 10.222 hereto for the draft form of credit agreement to be entered into in connection with the New Facility, which we refer to as the New Credit Agreement.

The Offering

        Resaca expects to offer between $50 million and $75 million in shares of Resaca common stock in an underwritten public offering (which amount includes the underwriters' 30 day option to purchase additional shares of Resaca common stock to cover overallotments, and which amount may be increased or decreased in the sole discretion of the Resaca board of directors in accordance with the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder). The actual amount of such offering will depend upon market conditions at the time. Management currently intends to use the net proceeds of the offering to repay between $43 million and $67 million of existing indebtedness for the combined company, depending on the actual size of the

I-28


Table of Contents


offering. The remaining proceeds of the offering will be retained as cash for general corporate purposes, including severance and merger related expenses, although these amounts ultimately depend upon the actual size of the offering, which is impossible to determine at this time.

Cano Property Sale

        During January 2010, Cano sold its interests in certain oil and gas properties located in the Texas Panhandle for net proceeds of $6.3 million. The sale had an effective date of January 1, 2010. As of January 1, 2010, the net book value of these sold assets was $3.8 million, based on updated reserve information as of December 31, 2009, which resulted in a pre-tax gain of $2.5 million. Cano used a portion of the net proceeds of $6.3 million to pay down its outstanding debt. As of May 28, 2010, Cano had available borrowing capacity of $1.1 million under its senior credit facility and a cash balance of $0.1 million.

Change in Transfer Agent and Registrar

        Effective upon the merger, the Transfer Agent and Registrar for the Resaca common stock and Resaca preferred stock will change from Computershare Investor Services (Jersey) Limited, its Transfer Agent and Registrar prior to the merger, to Computershare Trust Company N.A.

Conversion of Trading Denomination of Resaca Common Stock to U.S. Dollars

        On April 1, 2010, in preparation for the merger and the combined company's planned listing on NYSE Amex, the trading denomination of the Resaca common stock changed from British pounds to U.S. dollars.

Contact Information of the Combined Company

        Our principal executive offices are located at 1331 Lamar, Suite 1450, Houston, Texas 77010. The telephone number of our principal executive offices is (713) 650-1246. Our web site is www.resacaexploitation.com. The information on our web site does not constitute part of this proxy statement.


Organizational Structure

        The chart below depicts the organization of the combined company after giving effect to the merger.

CHART

I-29


Table of Contents

SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF RESACA

        The following table sets forth certain of Resaca's consolidated financial data as of and for each of the periods indicated. The financial information as of and for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 has been derived from Resaca's audited consolidated financial statements. The financial information as of and for the nine month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2010 has been derived from Resaca's unaudited consolidated financial statements. The financial information as of June 30, 2006 and for the period from inception (March 1, 2006) to June 30, 2006 has been derived from Resaca's unaudited financial statements. This disclosure reflects Resaca's results only and does not include the effect of the merger, the issuance of Resaca common stock and Resaca preferred stock in conjunction with the merger, the Reverse Stock Split or the Rig Acquisition. The selected historical financial data below should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Resaca" beginning on page III-27 and Resaca's consolidated financial statements and notes thereto beginning on page F-11.

 
  Nine Months Ended
March 31,
   
   
   
  Period From
Inception
(March 1,
2006) To
June 30, 2006
 
 
  Years Ended June 30,  
In Thousands, Except Per Share Data
  2010   2009   2009   2008   2007  
 
  (unaudited)
  (unaudited)
   
   
   
  (unaudited)
 

Operating Revenues:

                                     

Total operating revenues

  $ 11,051   $ 11,048   $ 14,154   $ 18,559   $ 15,491   $ 2,927  

Operating Expenses:

                                     

Lease operating

    4,590     5,256     6,623     7,007     7,604     1,337  

Production and ad valorem taxes

    770     1,009     1,250     1,664     1,367     263  

General and administrative

    6,246     5,150     7,087     1,962     1,553     41  

Depletion and depreciation

    2,845     2,493     3,371     2,910     2,832     578  

Accretion of discount on asset retirement obligations

    130     289     281     341     295     49  

Inventory writedown

            318              
                           
 

Total operating expenses

    14,581     14,197     18,930     13,884     13,651     2,268  
                           

Income (loss) from operations:

    (3,530 )   (3,149 )   (4,776 )   4,675     1,840     659  
                           

Other income (expense):

                                     

Gain (loss) on derivatives

    (770 )   15,834     11,468     (12,349 )   (901 )   (504 )

Interest expense and other

    (2,442 )   (2,537 )   (3,981 )   (9,829 )   (9,348 )   (1,542 )
                           
 

Total other income (expense)

    (3,212 )   13,297     7,487     (22,178 )   (10,249 )   (2,046 )

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax benefit

    (6,742 )   10,148     2,711     (17,503 )   (8,409 )   (1,387 )

Deferred income tax benefit (expense)

    (2 )   (3,900 )                
                           

Net income (loss)

  $ (6,744 ) $ 6,248   $ 2,711   $ (17,503 ) $ (8,409 ) $ (1,387 )
                           

Net income (loss) per share—basic and diluted

  $ (0.07 ) $ 0.07   $ 0.03   $   $   $  
                           

Weighted average common shares outstanding

                                     
 

Basic

    96,777     92,259     92,259              
 

Diluted

    96,777     92,259     92,280              

I-30


Table of Contents


 
  Nine Months Ended
March 31,
   
   
   
  Period From
Inception
(March 1,
2006) To
June 30, 2006
 
 
  Years Ended June 30,  
 
  2010   2009   2009   2008   2007  
 
  (unaudited)
  (unaudited)
   
   
   
  (unaudited)
 

CASH FLOW DATA:

                                     

Cash flow provided by (used in):

                                     
 

Operating activities

  $ 358   $ (5,084 ) $ (3,953 ) $ 1,707   $ (2,797 ) $ (445 )
 

Investing activities

    (3,165 )   (19,201 )   (20,522 )   (4,526 )   (13,722 )   (85,828 )
 

Financing activities

    3,127     25,561     24,617     2,400     16,200     87,200  

 

 
  As of March 31,   As of June 30,  
 
  2010   2009   2009   2008   2007   2006  
 
  (unaudited)
  (unaudited)
   
   
   
  (unaudited)
 

BALANCE SHEET DATA:

                                     

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 675   $ 1,832   $ 330   $ 188   $ 607   $ 926  

Total assets

    125,096     124,765     122,000     107,751     103,131     93,191  

Long-term debt

    35,000     23,444     31,846     72,617     73,660     72,200  

Stockholders' equity

    77,853     82,218     79,751     (11,923 )   5,580     13,740  

I-31


Table of Contents

SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF CANO

        The following table sets forth certain of Cano's consolidated financial data as of and for each of the periods indicated. The financial information as of and for the years ended June 30, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 is derived from Cano's audited consolidated financial statements. The financial information as of and for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2010 is derived from Cano's unaudited consolidated financial statements. This disclosure reflects Cano's results only and does not include the effect of the merger, the issuance of Resaca common stock and Resaca preferred stock in conjunction with the merger, the Reverse Stock Split or the Rig Acquisition. The selected historical financial data below should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Cano" beginning on page III-66 for the year ended June 30, 2009 and nine months ended March 31, 2010 and Cano's consolidated financial statements and notes thereto beginning on page F-59.

 
  Nine Months Ended
March 31,
  Years Ended June 30,  
In Thousands, Except Per Share Data
  2010   2009   2009   2008   2007   2006   2005  
 
  (unaudited)
  (unaudited)
   
   
   
   
   
 

Operating Revenues:

                                           

Total operating revenues

  $ 16,368   $ 18,119     25,409   $ 34,650   $ 20,651   $ 14,371   $ 3,764  

Operating Expenses:

                                           

Lease operating

    11,785     13,687     18,842     13,273     8,733     5,952     2,069  

Production and ad valorem taxes

    1,365     1,662     2,352     2,454     1,695     985     223  

General and administrative

    9,360     16,561     19,156     14,859     12,635     7,623     4,754  

Impairment of long-lived assets

    283     22,398     26,670                  

Exploration expense

    5,024         11,379                  

Depletion and depreciation

    3,627     4,120     5,720     3,903     3,202     1,652     371  

Accretion of discount on asset retirement obligations

    203     225     305     204     131     89     48  
                               
 

Total operating expenses

    31,647     58,653     84,424     34,693     26,396     16,301     7,465  
                               

Loss from operations:

    (15,279 )   (40,534 )   (59,015 )   (43 )   (5,745 )   (1,930 )   (3,701 )
                               

Other income (expense):

                                           

Gain (loss) on derivatives

    (4,451 )   48,480     43,790     (31,955 )   (847 )   (2,705 )    

Impairment of goodwill

        (685 )   (685 )                

Interest expense and other

    (908 )   (357 )   (513 )   (761 )   (1,681 )   (2,075 )   12  
                               
 

Total other income (expense)

    (5,359 )   47,438     42,592     (32,716 )   (2,528 )   (4,780 )   12  

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax benefit

    (20,638 )   6,904     (16,423 )   (32,759 )   (8,273 )   (6,710 )   (3,689 )

Deferred income tax benefit

    6,803     (3,330 )   4,712     11,767     2,970     3,990      
                               

Income (loss) from continuing operations

    (13,835 )   3,574     (11,711 )   (20,992 )   (5,303 )   (2,720 )   (3,689 )

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of related taxes

    2,066     12,089     11,480     3,471     4,513     876     716  

Preferred stock discount

                            (417 )

Preferred stock dividend

    (1,359 )   (2,261 )   (2,730 )   (4,083 )   (3,169 )        

Preferred stock repurchased for less than carrying amount

        10,890     10,890                  
                               

Net income (loss) applicable to common stock

  $ (13,128 ) $ 24,292   $ 7,929   $ (21,604 ) $ (3,959 ) $ (1,844 ) $ (3,390 )
                               

Net income (loss) applicable to common stock:

                                           
 

Continuing operations

    (15,194 )   12,203     (3,551 )   (25,075 )   (8,472 )   (2,720 )   (4,106 )
 

Discontinued operations(a)

    2,066     12,089     11,480     3,471     4,513     876     716  
                               
 

Net income (loss) applicable to common stock

  $ (13,128 ) $ 24,292   $ 7,929   $ (21,604 ) $ (3,959 ) $ (1,844 ) $ (3,390 )
                               

Net income (loss) per share—basic

  $ (0.28 ) $ 0.53   $ 0.17   $ (0.60 ) $ (0.13 ) $ (0.08 ) $ (0.29 )

Net income (loss) per share—diluted

  $ (0.28 ) $ 0.50   $ 0.17   $ (0.60 ) $ (0.13 ) $ (0.08 ) $ (0.29 )
                               

Weighted average common shares outstanding

                                     
 

Basic

    45,570     46,094     45,361     35,829     30,758     22,364     11,839  
 

Diluted

    45,570     53,254     45,361     35,829     30,758     22,364     11,839  

(a)
The discontinued operations for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 pertain to the sale of certain wells located in Cano's Panhandle Properties during January 2010. The discontinued operations for the years ended June 30, 2005 through June 30, 2009 pertain to discontinued operations which occurred prior to June 30, 2009.

I-32


Table of Contents

 
  Nine Months Ended
March 31,
  Years Ended June 30,  
 
  2010   2009   2009   2008   2007   2006   2005  
 
  (unaudited)
  (unaudited)
   
   
   
   
   
 

CASH FLOW DATA:

                                           

Cash flow provided by (used in):

                                           
 

Operating activities

  $ (1,116 ) $ (5,111 ) $ (6,609 ) $ 17,028   $ 2,658   $ (6,083 ) $ (501 )
 

Investing activities

    (7,145 )   (7,183 )   (17,349 )   (84,751 )   (39,854 )   (78,365 )   (10,726 )
 

Financing activities

    8,726     11,850     23,653     66,301     38,670     84,948     9,797  

 

 
  As of March 31,   As of June 30,  
 
  2010   2009   2009   2008   2007   2006   2005  
 
  (unaudited)
  (unaudited)
   
   
   
   
   
 

BALANCE SHEET DATA:

                                           

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 857   $ 327   $ 392   $ 697   $ 2,119   $ 645   $ 145  

Total assets

    260,348     282,399     264,028     277,734     201,469     146,949     17,578  

Long-term debt (includes current portion)

    65,000     43,700     55,700     73,500     33,500     68,750      

Temporary equity

    26,240     25,127     25,405     45,086     47,596          

Stockholders' equity

    136,290     164,117     148,459     83,850     68,861     40,636     15,391  

I-33


Table of Contents

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL DATA

        The following unaudited pro forma combined financial data is designed to show how the merger of Resaca and Cano might have affected historical financial statements if the merger had been completed at an earlier time and was prepared based on the historical financial results reported by Resaca and Cano. The following should be read in connection with (i) the Resaca restated audited consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009 and the Resaca restated audited consolidated statement of operations for the year ended June 30, 2009; (ii) the Resaca unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2010 and the Resaca unaudited consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended March 31, 2010; (iii) the Cano audited consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009 and the Cano audited consolidated statement of operations for the year ended June 30, 2009; and (iv) the Cano unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2010 and the Cano unaudited consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, all beginning on page F-11 of this proxy statement.

        The following unaudited pro forma combined financial statements were prepared to present the effect of the merger to be accounted for as an acquisition of Cano by Resaca using the "purchase" method of accounting. In addition, Resaca will continue to use the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas properties. The unaudited pro forma combined financial statements give effect to the following transactions:

        The unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet as of March 31, 2010 is based on the unaudited consolidated balance sheet of Resaca and the unaudited consolidated balance sheet of Cano both as of March 31, 2010 included in this proxy statement and gives effect to the transactions listed above as if they had occurred on March 31, 2010 (other than preferred stock outstanding, which is as of May 28, 2010).

        The unaudited pro forma combined statement of operations for the year ended June 30, 2009 is based on the restated audited consolidated statement of operations of Resaca and the audited consolidated statement of operations of Cano both for the year ended June 30, 2009 included in this proxy statement and gives effect to the transactions listed above as if they had occurred on July 1, 2008.

        The unaudited pro forma combined statement of operations for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 is based on the unaudited consolidated statement of operations of Resaca and the unaudited consolidated statement of operations of Cano both for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 included in this proxy statement and gives effect to the transactions listed above as if they had occurred on July 1, 2008.

        The unaudited pro forma combined financial statements presented herein are based upon assumptions and include adjustments as explained in the notes to the unaudited pro forma combined financial statements, and the actual recording of the transactions upon closing of the merger could differ. The unaudited pro forma combined financial information is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations or the financial position that would have occurred if the transactions described above had been consummated on the dates indicated, nor is it necessarily indicative of future results of operations or financial position. However, management believes that the assumptions used provide a reasonable basis for presenting the significant effects of the transactions discussed above and that the pro forma adjustments give appropriate effect to those assumptions.

        You should read the unaudited pro forma combined financial data together with the historical financial statements of Resaca and Cano. The unaudited pro forma combined financial statements of Resaca and Cano have been included as required by the rules of the SEC and are provided for comparative purposes only.

I-34


Table of Contents


UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
MARCH 31, 2010

In Thousands, Except Shares and Per Share Amounts
  Resaca
Historical
Amounts(a)
  Cano
Historical
Amounts
  Adjustments
for Merger
and Reverse
Stock Split
  Pro Forma
as of
March 31,
2010
 

ASSETS

                         

Current assets

                         
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 650   $ 857   $   $ 1,507  
 

Restricted cash

    25             25  
 

Accounts receivable

    2,191     2,533         4,724  
 

Deferred tax assets

    241             241  
 

Derivative assets

        3,486         3,486  
 

Inventory and other current assets

    1,222     1,231         2,453  
                   
   

Total current assets

    4,329     8,107         12,436  
                   

Oil and gas properties

    130,506     292,942     (97,542 )(b)   325,906  

Less accumulated depletion and depreciation

    (12,000 )   (43,434 )   43,434   (b)   (12,000 )
                   

Net oil and gas properties

    118,506     249,508     (54,108 )   313,906  
                   

Fixed assets and other, net

    2,261     2,632         4,893  

Deferred tax asset

            898   (c)   898  

Goodwill

        101     (101 )(d)    
                   

TOTAL ASSETS

  $ 125,096   $ 260,348   $ (53,311 ) $ 332,133  
                   

LIABILITIES, TEMPORARY EQUITY AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

                         

Current liabilities

                         
 

Accounts payable

  $ 1,409   $ 3,830   $ 105   (n) $ 5,344  
 

Accrued liabilities

    1,595     2,364     2,917   (e)   6,876  
 

Due to affiliates, net

    1,756             1,756  
 

Deferred tax liabilities

        898         898  
 

Oil and gas sales payable

    116     730         846  
 

Derivative liabilities

    1,477     227         1,704  
 

Liabilities associated with discontinued operations

        105     (105 )(n)    
 

Current portion of long-term debt

        65,000         65,000  
 

Current portion of asset retirement obligations

        236         236  
                   
   

Total current liabilities

    6,353     73,390     2,917     82,660  

Long-term liabilities

                         
 

Long-term debt

    35,000             35,000  
 

Asset retirement obligations

    4,070     3,043         7,113  
 

Derivative liabilities

    1,579     3,606         5,185  
 

Deferred tax liabilities

    241     17,779     (17,779 )(c)   241  
                   
   

Total liabilities

    47,243     97,818     (14,862 )   130,199  
                   

Temporary equity

                         
 

Series D convertible preferred stock

        26,240     1,885   (f)   28,125  
                   

Commitments and contingencies

                         

Stockholders' equity

                         
 

Common stock

    970     5     (5 )(g)   387  

                193   (h)      

                (776 )(l)      
 

Additional paid-in capital

    93,236     190,485     (190,485 )(g)   153,539  

                59,527   (h)      

                776   (l)      
 

Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)

    (16,353 )   (53,503 )   53,503   (g)   19,883  

                36,236   (b)      
 

Treasury stock, at cost

        (697 )   697   (g)    
                   
   

Total stockholders' equity

    77,853     136,290     (40,334 )   173,809  
                   

TOTAL LIABILITIES, TEMPORARY EQUITY AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

  $ 125,096   $ 260,348   $ (53,311 ) $ 332,133  
                   

See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements.

I-35


Table of Contents


UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010

In Thousands, Except Per Share Data
  Resaca
Historical
Amounts(a)
  Cano
Historical
Amounts
  Adjustments
for Merger
and Reverse
Stock Split
  Pro Forma
Nine Months
Ended
March 31,
2010
 

Operating Revenues:

                         
 

Crude oil sales

  $ 10,086   $ 14,045   $ 35   (n) $ 24,166  
 

Natural gas sales

    1,199     2,323     972   (n)   4,494  
                   
   

Total operating revenues

    11,285     16,368     1,007     28,660  
                   

Operating Expenses:

                         
 

Lease operating

    4,590     11,785     178   (n)   16,553  
 

Production and ad valorem taxes

    770     1,365     118   (n)   2,253  
 

General and administrative

    6,246     9,360         15,606  
 

Impairment of long-lived assets

        283         283  
 

Exploration expense

        5,024     (5,024 )(j)    
 

Depletion and depreciation

    2,845     3,627     (730 )(i)   5,742  
 

Accretion of discount on asset retirement obligations

    130     203     2   (n)   335  
                   
   

Total operating expenses

    14,581     31,647     (5,456 )   40,772  
                   

Loss from operations

    (3,296 )   (15,279 )   6,463     (12,112 )

Other expense:

                         
 

Interest expense and other

    (2,442 )   (908 )   (43 )(n)   (3,393 )
 

Loss on derivatives

    (1,004 )   (4,451 )       (5,455 )
                   
   

Total other expense

    (3,446 )   (5,359 )   (43 )   (8,848 )
                   

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes

    (6,742 )   (20,638 )   6,420     (20,960 )

Deferred income tax benefit (expense)

    (2 )   6,803     (2,376 )(k)(n)   4,425  
                   

Loss from continuing operations

    (6,744 )   (13,835 )   4,044     (16,535 )

Income from discontinued operations, net of related taxes

        2,066     (2,066 )(n)    
                   

Net loss

    (6,744 )   (11,769 )   1,978     (16,535 )

Preferred stock dividend

        (1,359 )       (1,359 )
                   

Net loss applicable to common stock

  $ (6,744 ) $ (13,128 ) $ 1,978   $ (17,894 )
                   

Net loss per share

                         
 

Basic and diluted

  $ (0.07 ) $ (0.28 )       $ (0.46 )
                     

Weighted average common shares outstanding

                         
 

Basic and diluted

    96,777     45,570     (45,570 )(g)   38,934  
                     

                19,265   (h)      

                314   (e)      

                (77,422 )(m)      

See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements.

I-36


Table of Contents


UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended June 30, 2009

In Thousands, Except Per Share Data
  Resaca
Historical
Amounts(a)
  Cano
Historical
Amounts
  Adjustments
for Merger
and Reverse
Stock Split
  Pro Forma
Year Ended
June 30,
2009
 

Operating Revenues:

                         
 

Crude oil sales

  $ 12,688   $ 19,222   $ 1,321   (n) $ 33,231  
 

Natural gas sales

    1,879     5,875     1,757   (n)   9,511  
 

Other revenue

        312         312  
                   
   

Total operating revenues

    14,567     25,409     3,078     43,054  
                   

Operating Expenses:

                         
 

Lease operating

    6,623     18,842     638   (n)   26,103  
 

Production and ad valorem taxes

    1,250     2,352     197   (n)   3,799  
 

General and administrative

    7,087     19,156         26,243  
 

Impairment of long-lived assets

        26,670     (30,186 )(j)    
 

                3,516   (n)      
 

Exploration expense

        11,379     (11,379 )(j)    
 

Depletion and depreciation

    3,371     5,720     (891 )(i)   8,200  
 

Accretion of discount on asset retirement obligations

    281     305     3   (n)   589  
 

Inventory writedown

    318             318  
                   
   

Total operating expenses

    18,930     84,424     (38,102 )   65,252  
                   

Loss from operations

    (4,363 )   (59,015 )   41,180     (22,198 )

Other income (expense):

                         
 

Interest expense and other

    (3,981 )   (513 )   (34 )(n)   (4,528 )
 

Impairment of goodwill

        (685 )   685   (j)    
 

Gain on derivatives

    11,055     43,790         54,845  
                   
   

Total other income (expense)

    7,074     42,592     651     50,317  
                   

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

    2,711     (16,423 )   41,831     28,119  

Deferred income tax benefit

        4,712     (15,236 )(k)   (10,524 )
                   

Income (loss) from continuing operations

    2,711     (11,711 )   26,595     17,595  

Income from discontinued operations, net of related taxes

        11,480     (11,480 )(n)    

Preferred stock dividend

        (2,730 )       (2,730 )

Preferred stock repurchased for less than carrying amount

        10,890         10,890  
                   

Net income (loss) applicable to common stock

  $ 2,711   $ 7,929   $ 15,115   $ 25,755  
                   

Net income (loss) per share

                         
 

Basic and diluted

  $ 0.03   $ 0.17         $ 0.68  
                     

Weighted average common shares outstanding

                         
 

Basic

    92,259     45,361     (45,361 )(g)   37,995  
                     

                19,265   (h)      

                278   (e)      

                (73,807 )(m)      
 

Diluted

    92,280     45,361     (45,361 )(g)   37,999  
                     

                19,265   (h)      

                278   (e)      

                (73,824 )(m)      

See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements.

I-37


Table of Contents


NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(a)
The amounts presented in the Resaca historical balance sheet and statement of operations have been reclassified for consistency with the presentation of the Cano historical amounts. Such presentation will be adopted by the combined company post merger.

(b)
The following table summarizes the consideration paid for Cano by Resaca, and the allocation to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and recognized at the acquisition date.

Consideration

       

Equity instruments (19,264,518) shares of Resaca common stock per note (h)

  $ 59,720  
       

Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed

       

Current assets

  $ 8,107  

Oil and gas properties

    195,400  

Other assets

    3,530  

Current liabilities (including current portion of long-term debt)

    (76,307 )

Long-term liabilities

    (6,649 )

Preferred stock

    (28,125 )
       

Total identifiable net assets

    95,956  
       

Gain on bargain purchase per note (h)

  $ 36,236  
       

I-38


Table of Contents

(c)
To adjust Cano's historic deferred tax liabilities based primarily on adjustments to the carrying amount of Cano's oil and gas properties as discussed in note (b), and the establishment of a valuation allowance on Cano's NOL carryforwards. We established the valuation allowance on NOL carryforwards based on our estimation of the combined entity's demonstrated ability to utilize such carryforwards to offset future taxable income. The adjustment results in net deferred tax liability of zero attributable to Cano, reflected as a non-current asset of $0.9 million and a current liability of $0.9 million.

(d)
To eliminate Cano's historical goodwill.

(e)
To record severance liabilities for Cano's change of control provisions for two Cano executives to be terminated at the merger closing in 2010. The pro forma adjustment of $2.9 million consists of anticipated cash payments of $1.9 million and the issuance of $1.0 million in common stock. The actual number of shares to be issued will be determined based on Resaca's share price at the transaction closing date. For purposes of pro forma earnings per share, we have computed the number of shares to be issued based on the Resaca stock price of $0.62 per share on May 28, 2010, resulting in the issuance of approximately 0.3 million shares (after consideration of the Reverse Stock Split) pursuant to the change of control provisions.

(f)
To increase the carrying value of the preferred stock to its face value to reflect the current market value of the preferred stock, after giving effect to the amendment to the preferred stock certificate of designation contemplated in the merger agreement.

(g)
To eliminate Cano's historical equity balances and weighted average common shares outstanding.

(h)
To record the issuance of 19,264,518 shares of Resaca common stock, which includes approximately 124,321 shares of Resaca common stock issuable on the exercise of certain Cano stock options, based on Resaca's stock price of $3.10 per share as of May 28, 2010. Both the issuance of common shares and the transaction price were adjusted for the Reverse Stock Split. The stock issuance is valued at $59.7 million, of which $0.2 million is recorded as common stock (par value of $0.01 per share) and $59.5 million is recorded as additional paid-in capital.

I-39


Table of Contents

(i)
As a result of the merger, Cano will adopt the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas properties to conform with the method employed by Resaca. Based on the depletion calculation for the combined entity, depletion expense for the year ended June 30, 2009 and the nine months ended March 31, 2010 would be reduced by $0.9 million and $0.7 million, respectively.

(j)
Based on the combined entity ceiling test and purchase accounting entry discussed in note (b), Cano would not have recognized impairment of long-lived assets of $30.2 million, exploration expense of $11.4 million and impairment of goodwill of $0.7 million during the year ended June 30, 2009 and exploration expenses of $5.0 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010. Therefore, the pro forma adjustments include the reversal of these expense amounts during the year ended June 30, 2009 and the nine months ended March 31, 2010.

(k)
The income tax effect of the expense reductions as discussed in notes (i) and (j), excluding the impairment of goodwill, for the year ended June 30, 2009 and the nine months ended March 31, 2010 is $15.2 million and $2.4 million, respectively. The effective income tax rate used is 37%, based on Resaca's combined federal and state statutory rates. The impairment of goodwill is excluded since it is a permanent difference between book and taxable income.

(l)
To record the effect of the Reverse Stock Split. As of March 31, 2010, Resaca had 96,947,494 shares of its $0.01 par value common shares outstanding. If the Reverse Stock Split had occurred on March 31, 2010, Resaca would have had 19,389,499 shares outstanding, resulting in par value of approximately $193,000. The adjustment represents the difference between Resaca's historical par value of $969,000 and the pro forma par value reflecting the Reverse Stock Split of $193,000.

(m)
To adjust weighted average historical shares outstanding for the Reverse Stock Split, as if such split occurred on July 1, 2008, by dividing Resaca's historical amounts by five.

(n)
Since the combined company will apply the full cost method of accounting, income from discontinued operations is not presented unless substantially all properties in a cost center are disposed. Accordingly, this adjustment reclassifies income from discontinued operations to the respective income statement captions of operating revenues, lease operating expenses, production and ad valorem taxes, depletion and depreciation, accretion of discount on asset retirement obligations and interest expense and other. In addition, the gain on disposition (net of related income taxes) of $12.3 million and $1.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2009 and for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, respectively, is being eliminated as no gain would be recorded under full cost accounting since the credit of proceeds against oil and gas properties would have not materially impacted the amortization rate. Also, the liabilities associated with discontinued operations were reclassified to accounts payable.

I-40


Table of Contents

PRO FORMA COMBINED SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)

        The following tables present certain unaudited pro forma combined information concerning Resaca's and Cano's proved oil and gas reserves at June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2009 and certain pro forma combined information giving effect to the merger as if it had occurred on July 1, 2008. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating the quantities of proved reserves and projecting future rates of production and timing of development expenditures. The following reserve data represent estimates only and reflects prices and costs at June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2009, and should not be construed as being exact.

 
  Resaca
Historical
Amounts
  Cano
Historical
Amounts
  Pro Forma
Amounts
 

Reserves—Crude Oil (MBbls)

                   

Reserves at June 30, 2008

    14,732     39,116     53,848  

Extensions and discoveries

        2,544     2,544  

Sale of minerals in place

        (1,240 )   (1,240 )

Purchases

    221         221  

Revisions of prior estimates

    (2,796 )   (1,338 )   (4,134 )

Production

    (189 )   (311 )   (500 )
               

Reserves at June 30, 2009

    11,968     38,771     50,739  
               

Proved developed reserves at June 30, 2009

   
6,722
   
7,027
   
13,749
 

 

 
  Resaca
Historical
Amounts
  Cano
Historical
Amounts
  Pro Forma
Amounts
 

Reserves—Natural Gas (MMCF)

                   

Reserves at June 30, 2008

    18,941     84,439     103,380  

Extensions and discoveries

        472     472  

Sale of minerals in place

        (7,886 )   (7,886 )

Purchases

    284         284  

Revisions of prior estimates

    (5,639 )   (14,191 )   (19,830 )

Production

    (287 )   (881 )   (1,168 )
               

Reserves at June 30, 2009

    13,299     61,953     75,252  
               

Proved developed reserves at June 30, 2009

   
7,502
   
18,322
   
25,824
 

 

 
  Resaca
Historical
Amounts
  Cano
Historical
Amounts
  Pro Forma
Amounts
 

Standardized Measure of Discounted Cash Flows: ($000s)

                   

Future cash inflows

  $ 861,424   $ 2,751,854   $ 3,613,278  

Future production costs

    (240,966 )   (767,743 )   (1,008,709 )

Future development costs

    (97,151 )   (332,677 )   (429,828 )

Future income taxes

    (154,507 )   (535,300 )   (689,807 )
               

Future net cash flows

    368,800     1,116,134     1,484,934  

10% annual discount

    (232,638 )   (834,122 )   (1,066,760 )
               

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows at June 30, 2009

  $ 136,162   $ 282,012   $ 418,174  
               

I-41


Table of Contents


 
  Resaca
Historical
Amounts
  Cano
Historical
Amounts
  Pro Forma
Amounts
 

Changes in Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Cash Flows: ($000s)

                   

Balance at June 30, 2008

  $ 445,776   $ 1,412,543   $ 1,858,319  

Net changes in prices and production costs

    (422,943 )   (1,598,659 )   (2,021,602 )

Net changes in future development costs

    1,582     (36,746 )   (35,164 )

Sales of oil and gas produced, net

    (7,531 )   (6,552 )   (14,083 )

Purchases of reserves

    9,746         9,746  

Sales of reserves

        (94,357 )   (94,357 )

Extensions and discoveries

        38,256     38,256  

Revisions of previous quantity estimates

    (65,786 )   (54,017 )   (119,803 )

Previously estimated development costs incurred

    5,954     47,590     53,544  

Net change in income taxes

    168,297     349,339     517,636  

Accretion of discount

    67,887     224,235     292,122  

Other

    (66,820 )   380     (66,440 )
               

Balance at June 30, 2009

  $ 136,162   $ 282,012   $ 418,174  
               

I-42


Table of Contents

SUMMARY OIL AND GAS DATA

Operating Data

        The following table presents certain information with respect to Resaca's historical operating data for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and pro forma combined operating data for the year ended June 30, 2009 and the nine months ended March 31, 2010, after giving effect to the merger.

 
  Resaca
Historical
   
   
 
 
  Pro Forma Combined  
 
  Years Ended June 30,   Nine Months
Ended
March 31,
2010
 
 
  Year Ended
June 30,
2009
  Nine Months
March 31,
2010
 
 
  2007   2008   2009  

Wells drilled (net)

                                     
 

Exploratory

                    4.00      
 

Development

    6.52         4.62         18.62     1  

Net sales data

                                     
 

Net volume (MBOE)

    277     256     237     174     702     457  
 

Average daily volume (BOEPD)

    760     700     650     636     1,924     1,673  

Average sales price (per BOE)

                                     
 

Excludes the effect of commodity derivatives

  $ 54.31   $ 85.03   $ 61.45   $ 64.99   $ 60.85   $ 62.76  
 

Includes the effect of commodity derivatives

  $ 55.84   $ 72.62   $ 59.70   $ 63.64   $ 69.80   $ 70.57  

Expenses (per BOE)

                                     
 

Lease operating

  $ 27.41   $ 27.42   $ 27.94   $ 26.43   $ 37.16   $ 36.25  
 

Production and ad valorem taxes

  $ 4.93   $ 6.51   $ 5.27   $ 4.43   $ 5.41   $ 4.93  

Estimated Reserve Data

        The estimates in the table below of proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 are based on reserve reports prepared by Resaca's and Cano's independent petroleum engineers. You should refer to "Risk Factors," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Resaca," and "Business and Properties" in evaluating the material presented below.

 
  June 30, 2009   Pro Forma
Combined
June 30,
2009(1)
 
 
  Resaca   Cano  

Estimated proved reserves(2)

                   
 

Oil (MBbls)

    11,968     38,771     50,739  
 

Gas (MMcf)

    13,299     61,953     75,252  
 

Total proved reserves (MBOE)

    14,184     49,097     63,281  
 

Proved developed producing reserves:

                   
 

Oil (MBbls)

    1,911     5,752     7,663  
 

Gas (MMcf)

    2,552     11,904     14,456  
 

Total proved developed producing reserves (MBOE)

    2,336     7,735     10,071  
 

Proved developed reserves:

                   
 

Oil (MBbls)

    6,722     7,027     13,749  
 

Gas (MMcf)

    7,502     18,322     25,824  
 

Total proved developed reserves (MBOE)

    7,973     10,081     18,054  

PV-10 value (millions)(2)(3)

                   
 

Proved developed producing reserves

  $ 29.5   $ 63.5   $ 93.0  
 

Proved developed non-producing reserves

    93.0     15.0     108.0  
 

Proved undeveloped reserves

    70.7     392.8     463.5  
               
 

Total PV-10 value

  $ 193.2   $ 471.3   $ 664.5  
               

Standardized measure of oil and gas quantities (millions)(2)

  $ 136.2   $ 282.0   $ 418.2  

(1)
Gives effect to the merger with Cano.

I-43


Table of Contents

(2)
Resaca's estimated proved reserves and the future net revenues, PV-10, and standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows were determined using end of the period prices for natural gas and oil that Resaca realized as of June 30, 2009, which were $69.89 per barrel of oil and $3.84 per MMBtu of natural gas. Cano's estimated proved reserves and the future net revenues, PV-10, and standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows were determined using end of the period prices for natural gas and oil that Cano realized as of June 30, 2009, which were $69.89 per barrel of oil and $3.71 per MMBtu of natural gas.

(3)
PV-10 is a non-GAAP financial measure and generally differs from the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, because it does not include the effects of income taxes on future net revenues. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Resaca—The Combined Company" for our definition of PV-10 and a reconciliation of PV-10 to the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows.

The following table shows Resaca's, Cano's and the combined company's reconciliation of PV-10 to standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows (the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP) at June 30, 2009. PV-10 is our estimate of the present value of future net revenues from estimated proved oil and gas reserves after deducting estimated production and ad valorem taxes, future capital costs and operating expenses, but before deducting any estimates of future income taxes. The estimated future net revenues are discounted at an annual rate of 10% to determine their "present value." We believe PV-10 to be an important measure for evaluating the relative significance of our gas and oil properties and that the presentation of the non-GAAP financial measure of PV-10 provides useful information to investors because it is widely used by professional analysts and sophisticated investors in evaluating gas and oil companies. Because there are many unique factors that can impact an individual company when estimating the amount of future income taxes to be paid, we believe the use of a pre-tax measure is valuable for evaluating its company. We believe that most other companies in the oil and gas industry calculate PV-10 on the same basis.

PV-10 should not be considered as an alternative to the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows as computed under GAAP.

 
  June 30, 2009    
 
 
  Pro Forma
June 30, 2009
 
In millions
  Resaca   Cano  

PV-10 value

  $ 193.2   $ 471.3   $ 664.5  
 

Less: Undiscounted income taxes

    (154.5 )   (535.3 )   (689.8 )
 

Plus: 10% discount factor

    97.5     346.0     443.5  
               

Discounted income taxes

    (57.0 )   (189.3 )   (246.3 )
               

Standard measure of discounted future net cash flows

  $ 136.2   $ 282.0   $ 418.2  
               

        As discussed on pages I-56 and I-57, the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement is conditioned upon several items, one of which is Resaca's application for readmission to the AIM. In order to be readmitted to the AIM, Resaca is required to prepare an admission document according to AIM rules prior to the merger, which we refer to as the Readmission Document. The AIM rules require that Resaca include a reserve report for the combined proved, probable, and possible reserves of Resaca and Cano on an after-tax basis in the Readmission Document. To satisfy this requirement, Resaca engaged Haas, as its independent petroleum engineers, to prepare a report on the combined proved, probable, and possible crude oil and natural gas reserves for Resaca and Cano related to primary and secondary recovery. Haas has historically prepared the proved reserve reports for Resaca. Cano's proved reserve report dated June 30, 2009 was prepared by Miller and Lents, Ltd. Upon completion of the merger, Haas will prepare the combined company's future reserve reports related to primary and secondary recovery. In addition, Resaca engaged Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc., as its independent petroleum engineers to prepare a report on

I-44


Table of Contents


the combined probable and possible crude oil and natural gas reserves for Resaca and Cano related to tertiary recovery. Only the estimate of the combined company's proved reserves as prepared by Haas is included herein.

        The estimates presented in the table below of proved reserves as of December 31, 2009 are based on reserve reports prepared by Haas. These estimates do not include the effect of the SEC's revised oil and gas rules, "Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting," issued in December 2008, which is effective for annual reports on Forms 10-K for years ending on or after December 31, 2009. The revised SEC rules include changes to the pricing used to estimate reserves, the ability to include nontraditional resources in reserves, the use of new technology for determining reserves and permitted disclosure of probable and possible reserves. The estimated proved reserves, future net revenues and PV-10 presented in the table below were determined using SEC rules in effect for fiscal years prior to December 31, 2009 including the use of end of the period prices for oil and natural gas as of December 31, 2009, which were $79.39 per barrel of oil and $5.82 per MMBtu of natural gas, instead of an unweighted average 12-month price calculated as the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12-month period ended December 31, 2009, of $61.18 per Bbl for oil and $3.87 per MMBtu for natural gas under the revised SEC rules. The combined company will begin complying with the disclosure requirements of the final rule in its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2010. You should refer to "Risk Factors," "Business and Properties," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Resaca," and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Cano" on pages I-54, III-1, III-27 and III-66, respectively, in evaluating the material presented below.

 
  December 31, 2009   Pro Forma
Combined
December 31,
2009(1)
 
 
  Resaca   Cano  

Estimated proved reserves(2)

                   
 

Oil (MBbls)

    12,262     33,098     45,360  
 

Gas (MMcf)

    13,103     59,545     72,648  
 

Total proved reserves (MBOE)

    14,446     43,022     57,468  
 

Proved developed producing reserves:

                   
 

Oil (MBbls)

    2,144     4,605     6,749  
 

Gas (MMcf)

    2,492     9,839     12,331  
 

Total proved developed producing reserves (MBOE)

    2,559     6,245     8,804  
 

Proved developed reserves:

                   
 

Oil (MBbls)

    6,911     6,104     13,015  
 

Gas (MMcf)

    7,273     16,180     23,453  
 

Total proved developed reserves (MBOE)

    8,124     8,800     16,924  

PV-10 value (millions)(2)(3)

                   
 

Proved developed producing reserves

  $ 42.4   $ 69.3   $ 111.7  
 

Proved developed non-producing reserves

    117.4     30.4     147.8  
 

Proved undeveloped reserves

    100.3     413.7     514.0  
               
 

Total PV-10 value

  $ 260.1   $ 513.4   $ 773.5  
               

Standardized measure of oil and gas quantities (millions)(2)

  $ 179.7   $ 332.4   $ 512.1  
               

(1)
Gives effect to the merger with Cano.

(2)
Resaca's and Cano's estimated proved reserves and the future net revenues, PV-10, and standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows were determined using end of the period

I-45


Table of Contents

(3)
PV-10 is a non-GAAP financial measure and generally differs from the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, because it does not include the effects of income taxes on future net revenues.


The following table shows Resaca's, Cano's and the combined company's reconciliation of PV-10 to standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows (the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP) at December 31, 2009. PV-10 is our estimate of the present value of future net revenues from estimated proved oil and gas reserves after deducting estimated production and ad valorem taxes, future capital costs and operating expenses, but before deducting any estimates of future income taxes. The estimated future net revenues are discounted at an annual rate of 10% to determine their "present value." We believe PV-10 to be an important measure for evaluating the relative significance of our gas and oil properties and that the presentation of the non-GAAP financial measure of PV-10 provides useful information to investors because it is widely used by professional analysts and sophisticated investors in evaluating gas and oil companies. Because there are many unique factors that can impact an individual company when estimating the amount of future income taxes to be paid, we believe the use of a pre-tax measure is valuable for evaluating its company. We believe that most other companies in the oil and gas industry calculate PV-10 on the same basis.


PV-10 should not be considered as an alternative to the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows as computed under GAAP.

 
  December 31, 2009    
 
 
  Pro Forma
December 31, 2009
 
In millions
  Resaca   Cano  

PV-10 value

  $ 260.1   $ 513.4   $ 773.5  
 

Less: Undiscounted income taxes

    (201.7 )   (582.6 )   (784.3 )
 

Plus: 10% discount factor

    121.3     401.6     522.9  
               

Discounted income taxes

    (80.4 )   (181.0 )   (261.4 )
               

Standard measure of discounted future net cash flows

  $ 179.7   $ 332.4   $ 512.1  
               

        As of December 31, 2009, the PV-10 value for the combined company is $773.5 million, which is an increase of $109.0 million or 16.4% higher than the PV-10 value computed at June 30, 2009 of $664.5 million. The $109.0 million increase is primarily attributed to higher commodity prices. At December 31, 2009, flat case crude oil and natural gas prices were $79.39 per barrel and $5.82 per MMBtu, respectively, as compared to corresponding crude oil and natural gas prices at June 30, 2009 of $69.89 per barrel and $3.71 per MMBtu.

        As of December 31, 2009, proved reserves were 57.5 MMBOE, which is a reduction of 7.9%, after considering the Cano property sale of 0.5 MMBOE and production for the six months ended December 31, 2009 of 0.3 MMBOE, as compared to proved reserves on June 30, 2009 of 63.3 MMBOE. The majority of the reduction was due to reclassifying 4.4 MMBOE of proved undeveloped reserves associated with the Panhandle Properties at June 30, 2009 to probable reserves as of December 31, 2009.

        As previously discussed, the combined company will adopt the SEC's revised rules on reserve determination for its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2010. Haas estimates that, had the combined company applied unweighted 12-month average prices, calculated as the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12-month period ended December 31, 2009, pricing at December 31, 2009 under the SEC's revised rules, the

I-46


Table of Contents


combined company's proved reserves would have decreased by 1.7 MMBOE, which is a reduction of 3% as compared to proved reserves of 57.5 MMBOE using December 31, 2009 flat pricing. Haas estimates that utilizing the unweighted 12-month average pricing at December 31, 2009 would have reduced the PV-10 value of the combined company's proved reserves by $404.9 million or 52% as compared to PV-10 value of proved reserves of $773.5 million using December 31, 2009 flat pricing. Beginning June 30, 2010, the combined company will be required to prepare its reserves estimates using the definitions and pricing required by the SEC's revised rules.

I-47


Table of Contents

COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA (UNAUDITED)

        The following tables set forth historical per share information of Resaca and Cano and unaudited pro forma combined per share information after giving effect to the merger and the Rig Acquisition, but without giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split. The historical per share information of Resaca for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 includes the effect of the Rig Acquisition. Neither company has ever declared dividends on their respective common stock since their formation. Resaca common stock began trading on the AIM on July 17, 2008 so historical per share information for Resaca is unavailable for years ended prior to June 30, 2009. The terms of the Cano preferred stock require Cano to pay quarterly dividends to the holders thereof. See "—Comparative Per Share Market Price and Dividend Information—Dividends and Other Distributions" on page I-51.

        The unaudited pro forma combined per share information does not purport to represent what the results of operations or financial position of Resaca, Cano or the combined company would actually have been had the merger occurred at the beginning of the period shown, or to project Resaca's, Cano's or the combined company's results of operations or financial position for any future period or date. This pro forma combined information is derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, the unaudited pro forma combined financial statements and accompanying notes included in this proxy statement as presented under "—Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Data" beginning on page I-34.

        The historical per share information is derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, the financial statements for each of Resaca and Cano, which are included in this proxy statement. See "Business & Financial Information of Resaca and Cano" beginning on page III-1.

 
  Nine Months Ended
March 31,
2010
  Year Ended
June 30,
2009
 

Resaca Historical Per Share Data:

             
 

Income from continuing operations:

             
   

Basic(a)

  $ (0.07 ) $ 0.03  
   

Diluted(a)

  $ (0.07 ) $ 0.03  
 

Book Value Per Share—Diluted(b)

  $ 0.80   $ 0.86  

Cano Historical Per Share Data:

             
 

Income from continuing operations

             
   

Basic(a)

  $ (0.28 ) $ (0.17 )
   

Diluted(a)

  $ (0.28 ) $ (0.17 )
 

Book Value Per Share—Diluted(c)

  $ 2.99   $ 3.27  

Pro Forma Resaca Per Share Data:

             
 

Income from continuing operations

             
   

Basic(a)

  $ (0.46 ) $ 0.68  
   

Diluted(a)

  $ (0.46 ) $ 0.68  
 

Book Value Per Share—Diluted(d)

  $ 4.46   $ 4.12  

Pro Forma Cano Equivalent Per Share Data:

             
 

Income from continuing operations

             
   

Basic(e)

  $ (0.19 ) $ 0.28  
   

Diluted(e)

  $ (0.19 ) $ 0.28  
 

Book Value Per Share—Diluted(e)

  $ 1.87   $ 1.73  

(a)
These amounts are presented on the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statement of Operations. See "Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Data" beginning on page I-34.

(b)
For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, the amount was computed based on Resaca's historical book value of $77.9 million divided by weighted average diluted common shares of

I-48


Table of Contents

(c)
For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, the amount was computed based on Cano's historical book value of $136.3 million divided by weighted average diluted common shares of 45.6 million. For the year ended June 30, 2009, the amount was computed based on Cano's historical book value of $148.5 million divided by weighted average diluted common shares of 45.4 million.

(d)
For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, the amount was computed based on the Resaca pro forma book value of $173.8 million divided by weighted average diluted common shares of 38.9 million. For the year ended June 30, 2009, the amount was computed based on the Resaca pro forma book value of $156.6 million divided by weighted average diluted common shares of 38.0 million.

(e)
Pro forma combined Cano equivalent per share data is calculated by multiplying the pro forma Resaca per share data by the stock exchange ratio of 0.42.

I-49


Table of Contents

COMPARATIVE PER SHARE MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION

Historical Stock Prices

        Resaca common stock is listed on the AIM under the symbols "RSX" and "RSOX." Cano common stock is listed on the NYSE Amex under the symbol "CFW." The following table sets forth, for the calendar quarters indicated, the high and low sales prices per share of Resaca common stock and Cano common stock on the AIM and NYSE Amex, respectively. Resaca common stock began trading on the AIM on July 17, 2008 so historical per share sales prices for Resaca are unavailable for the years ended June 30, 2007 and 2008.

 
  Reverse Stock
Split Adjusted
Resaca Common
Stock(1)(2)
  Resaca Common
Stock(1)
  Cano Common
Stock
 
 
  High   Low   High   Low   High   Low  

Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010

                                     

First Quarter

  $ 4.90   $ 2.20   $ 0.98   $ 0.44   $ 1.37   $ 0.52  

Second Quarter

  $ 4.50   $ 2.90   $ 0.90   $ 0.58   $ 1.31   $ 0.79  

Third Quarter

  $ 3.50   $ 2.60   $ 0.70   $ 0.52   $ 1.22   $ 0.76  

Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2009

                                     

First Quarter

  $ 13.40   $ 10.70   $ 2.68   $ 2.14   $ 8.03   $ 2.01  

Second Quarter

  $ 10.95   $ 0.95   $ 2.19   $ 0.19   $ 2.34   $ 0.22  

Third Quarter

  $ 2.10   $ 1.40   $ 0.42   $ 0.28   $ 0.75   $ 0.24  

Fourth Quarter

  $ 2.15   $ 1.30   $ 0.43   $ 0.26   $ 1.55   $ 0.40  

Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2008

                                     

First Quarter

                  $ 7.42   $ 5.05  

Second Quarter

                  $ 8.85   $ 5.94  

Third Quarter

                  $ 7.50   $ 3.85  

Fourth Quarter

                  $ 9.40   $ 4.29  

Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2007

                                     

First Quarter

                  $ 6.40   $ 3.69  

Second Quarter

                  $ 5.80   $ 3.90  

Third Quarter

                  $ 5.47   $ 4.15  

Fourth Quarter

                  $ 6.46   $ 4.40  

(1)
Prior to April 1, 2010, Resaca common stock was traded on the AIM in British pounds. The dollar amounts reflected herein have been converted to U.S. dollars at applicable exchange rates for the periods presented.

(2)
Historical prices are adjusted for the Reverse Stock Split.

        On September 28, 2009, the second to last full trading day before the public announcement of the merger, the closing price per share of Resaca common stock on the AIM was U.K. £0.50, which, after applying an assumed exchange rate of U.S. $1.5882 per British pound, equates to $0.794 per Resaca common share and the closing price per share of Cano common stock on the NYSE Amex was $1.02.

        As of May 28, 2010, there were approximately 154 record holders of Resaca common stock. As of May 28, 2010, there were approximately 107 record holders of Cano common stock and approximately 7,300 beneficial holders of Cano common stock in street name. Additionally, as of May 28, 2010, there were 16 record holders of Cano preferred stock.

I-50


Table of Contents

Dividends and Other Distributions

        Resaca does not currently pay dividends on Resaca common stock. After the merger, the combined company intends to retain its earnings to finance the expansion of its business and for general corporate purposes. In addition, we expect that the New Facility will not permit it to pay dividends to Resaca common stock. Therefore, Resaca does not anticipate paying cash dividends on its common stock in the foreseeable future.

        Cano has not declared any dividends to date on Cano common stock. Cano has no present intention of paying any cash dividends on Cano common stock in the foreseeable future. Cano's credit agreements do not permit it to pay dividends on Cano common stock. In addition, the terms of the Cano preferred stock do not permit Cano to pay dividends on Cano common stock without the approval of the holders of a majority of the Cano preferred stock.

        For the year ended June 30, 2009, the Cano preferred stock dividend was $2.7 million, of which $1.6 million pertained to holders of the payment-in-kind dividend option. For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, the Cano preferred stock dividend was $1.4 million, of which $0.8 million pertained to holders of the payment-in-kind dividend option.

        We expect that the New Facility will not permit us to pay dividends to holders of Resaca common stock. In addition, the terms of the Resaca preferred stock will not permit Resaca to pay dividends on Resaca common stock without the approval of a majority of the Resaca preferred stock. Therefore, we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the forseeable future.

I-51


Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        This proxy statement and the documents that are incorporated by reference include "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which we refer to as the Securities Act, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which we refer to as the Exchange Act, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 about Cano that are subject to risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in, or incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may be found under "Summary," "The Merger," "Risk Factors," "Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements" and the risk factors in the periodic reports filed under the Exchange Act by Cano and elsewhere in this proxy statement regarding the outlooks or expectations for earnings, revenues, expenses, financial position, business strategy, production and reserve growth, possible or assumed future results of operations, and other plans and objectives for the future operations of Resaca and Cano, and statements regarding integration of the businesses of Resaca and Cano and general economic conditions. Specifically, forward looking statements may include:

        Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and include information concerning cost savings from the merger. Although Cano believes that in making such statements its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements may be influenced by factors that could cause actual outcomes and results to be materially different from those projected.

        You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this proxy statement, or in the case of a document incorporated by reference, as of the date of that document. Except as required by law, Cano undertakes no obligation to publicly update or release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect any events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

        The following important factors, in addition to those discussed under "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this proxy statement, could affect the future results of the energy industry in general, and the combined company after the merger in particular, and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements:

I-52


Table of Contents

        All written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to Cano or persons acting on behalf of Cano are expressly qualified in their entirety by such factors. For additional information with respect to these factors, see "Where You Can Find More Information" on page II-8.

I-53


Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS

        In addition to the other information contained in or incorporated by reference into this proxy statement, you should carefully consider the following risk factors in deciding how to vote on the merger. In addition, you should read and consider the risks associated with each of the businesses of Resaca and Cano because these risks will also relate to the combined company.


Risks Relating to the Merger

Because the market price of Resaca common stock will fluctuate, Cano stockholders cannot be sure of the market value of the Resaca common stock that they will receive.

        When we complete the merger, shares of Cano common stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.42 shares of Resaca common stock. The exchange ratio is fixed and will not be adjusted for changes in the market price of either Resaca common stock or Cano common stock. The merger agreement does not provide for any price-based termination right. Accordingly, the market value of the shares of Resaca common stock that Resaca grants and Cano stockholders will be entitled to receive when we complete the merger will depend on the market value of shares of Resaca common stock at the time that we complete the merger and could vary significantly from the market value on the date of this proxy statement or the date of the Cano annual meeting. The market value of the shares of Resaca common stock will also continue to fluctuate after the completion of the merger. For example, for the period from July 17, 2008 (the date of Resaca's initial public offering) through December 31, 2009, the market price of Resaca common stock ranged from a low of $0.19 (assuming an exchange rate of U.S. $1.4914 per British pound) to a high of $2.68 (assuming an exchange rate of U.S. $1.9984 per British pound), all as reported on the AIM. For the period from July 1, 2008 through December 31, 2009, the market price of Cano common stock ranged from a low of $0.22 to a high of $8.03. See "Comparative Per Share Market Price and Dividend Information" on page I-50. The market price of Resaca common stock on May 28, 2010 was $0.62. The market price of Cano common stock on May 28, 2010 was $1.11.

        These variations could result from changes in the business, operations or prospects of Cano or Resaca prior to or following the merger, regulatory considerations, general market and economic conditions and other factors both within and beyond the control of Resaca or Cano.

The issuance of shares of Resaca common stock to Cano stockholders in the merger will substantially reduce the percentage interests of Resaca shareholders.

        If the merger is completed, Resaca will issue up to approximately 19.3 million shares of Resaca common stock in the merger (assuming the Resaca shareholder approval of the Reverse Stock Split). Based on the number of shares of Resaca and Cano common stock outstanding on the Resaca and Cano record dates, prior to completion of the offering, Cano common stockholders will own, in the aggregate, approximately 50% of the shares of common stock of the combined company outstanding immediately after the merger. The issuance of shares of Resaca common stock to Cano stockholders in the merger and to holders of assumed options and restricted stock units to acquire shares of Cano common stock will cause a significant reduction in the relative percentage interest of current Resaca shareholders in earnings, voting, liquidation value and book and market value.

In connection with the merger, all of Resaca's and Cano's indebtedness will need to be refinanced.

        As a condition precedent to the consummation of the merger, all of the outstanding indebtedness of Resaca and Cano will need to be refinanced. Due to prevailing conditions in the debt markets, debt financing to fund such refinancing may not be available on terms favorable to the combined company or at all. At May 28, 2010, the aggregate principal amount of the outstanding indebtedness of Resaca and Cano was approximately $100.9 million.

I-54


Table of Contents


Failure to complete the merger for regulatory or other reasons could adversely affect Resaca and Cano stock prices and their future business and financial results.

        Completion of the merger is conditioned upon, among other things, the consent of the lenders under the credit facilities of each of Resaca and Cano and the completion of the offering. There is no assurance that Resaca and Cano will be successful in its efforts to obtain such consents or that Resaca will be able to refinance the credit facilities upon the closing of the merger. There can be no assurance that Resaca will successfully complete the offering or raise the anticipated amount of proceeds. Failure to complete the proposed merger would prevent Resaca and Cano from realizing the anticipated benefits of the merger. Each company will also remain liable for significant transaction costs, including legal, accounting and financial advisory fees. In addition, Resaca and/or Cano may be unable to obtain future covenant waivers from their respective lenders, which could result in Resaca's and/or Cano's default on their respective obligations under one or both of their respective credit agreements and the acceleration of all indebtedness outstanding under those credit agreements. Further, the market price of each company's common stock may reflect various market assumptions as to whether the merger will occur. Consequently, the completion of, or failure to complete, the merger could result in a significant change in the market price of Resaca's and Cano's common stock.

The issuance of common stock in the offering will dilute the existing ownership interests of the Resaca shareholders and Cano stockholders.

        The issuance of shares of Resaca common stock in the offering will have the following effects:

        In addition, the issuance of shares of Resaca common stock in the offering may result in the following:

Trading in Resaca's common stock will be temporarily suspended while the merger is completed.

        Resaca must temporarily suspend trading in its common stock on the AIM while the merger is completed. Because the merger will constitute a reverse takeover under the AIM rules, Resaca common stock must be readmitted to trading on the AIM immediately following the merger. Following the Resaca annual meeting and the pricing of the offering, trading of Resaca common stock on the AIM will be suspended until the completion of the merger and the closing of the offering. During the time that the Resaca common stock is not trading, Resaca shareholders will not be able to sell their shares or buy additional shares of Resaca common stock on the AIM. The value of the Resaca common stock may face significant material adverse consequences due to the suspension, including reduced value and liquidity.

Failure to complete the offering will adversely affect the ability of Cano and Resaca to consummate the merger.

        If Resaca is unable to complete the underwritten offering of between $50 million and $75 million of its common stock (which amount may be increased or decreased in the sole discretion of the Resaca board of directors in accordance with the provisions of the Securities Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder), it will be unable to reduce existing indebtedness of the combined company, as required by the New Facility. Entering into the New Facility is a condition to closing the merger. Accordingly, if the offering does not result in gross proceeds to Resaca of at least approximately $45 million, Resaca will have to renegotiate the New Facility. Failure to do so will negatively impact

I-55


Table of Contents


Resaca's ability to consummate the merger upon the terms presently contemplated and could result in a termination of the merger agreement.

Resaca may not be able successfully to integrate its operations with Cano's operations.

        Integration of Cano's operations with Resaca's will be a complex, time consuming and costly process involving the following risks and difficulties, among others:

As a result, we may be unable to integrate Cano successfully and realize anticipated economic, operational and other benefits in a timely manner, which could result in substantial costs and delays or other operational, technical or financial problems.

Because certain directors and executive officers of Cano have interests in seeing the merger completed that are different from the interests of other Cano stockholders, these persons may have conflicts of interest in recommending that Cano stockholders vote to approve the merger agreement.

        The directors and executive officers of Cano are parties to agreements or participate in other arrangements that give them interests in the merger that are different from the interests of other Cano stockholders. For example:

        You should consider these interests in voting on the merger, including whether these interests may have influenced these directors and executive officers to recommend or support the merger. We have described these different interests under "The Merger—Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger" beginning on page I-107.

The delay or failure to obtain all necessary third party consents and regulatory approvals from governmental entities could prevent or delay the completion of the merger and/or result in adverse financial and legal consequences to the combined company, Resaca or Cano.

        The merger agreement requires that Resaca and Cano obtain the following consents and approvals from third parties and regulatory authorities prior to completion of the merger:

I-56


Table of Contents

        Resaca or Cano may waive these requirements with respect to consents to be obtained by the other party at its discretion. If one party waives the other's requirement to obtain one or more of these third party consents and they are not obtained, the third party entitled to give the consent may have a claim against the combined company, which may result in adverse financial and legal consequences to the surviving company. Further, the delay or denial of any requisite consents, approvals or exemptions could prevent or delay the completion of the merger.

The merger may not occur if Resaca or Cano do not waive conditions to the closing of the merger that are unable to be met.

        Resaca and Cano may each waive conditions to closing of the merger with respect to third party consents to be obtained by the other party at its discretion. If Resaca or Cano fail to obtain a required third party consent and cannot get a waiver from the other party, the merger may be delayed or fail to be completed.

The merger agreement contains provisions that could discourage a potential competing acquirer that might be willing to pay more to acquire Cano or that may be willing to acquire Resaca.

        The merger agreement contains "no shop" provisions that restrict Resaca's and Cano's ability to solicit or facilitate proposals regarding a merger or similar transaction with another party. Further, there are only limited exceptions to Resaca's or Cano's agreement that their respective board of directors will not withdraw or adversely qualify its recommendation regarding the merger agreement. Although each of the Resaca and Cano boards are permitted to terminate the merger agreement in response to a superior proposal if they determine that a failure to do so would be inconsistent with their fiduciary duties, its doing so would entitle the other party to collect a $3.5 million termination fee from the terminating party. In addition, in certain instances if the merger agreement is terminated and Resaca or Cano consummate certain takeover transactions within six months after the termination of the merger agreement, the other party would be entitled to collect a $3.5 million termination fee from the party participating in the takeover transaction. We describe these provisions under "The Merger Agreement—Termination" beginning on page I-126 and "—Termination Fees and Expenses" beginning on page I-127.

I-57


Table of Contents

        These provisions could discourage a potential competing acquirer from considering or proposing an acquisition, even if it were prepared to pay consideration with a higher value than that proposed to be paid in the merger, or might result in a potential competing acquirer proposing to pay a lower per share price than it might otherwise have proposed to pay because of the added expense of the termination fee.

There are risks associated with the Reverse Stock Split, including that the Reverse Stock Split may not result in a sustained increase in the per share price of Resaca common stock.

        Resaca cannot predict whether the Reverse Stock Split will result in a sustained increase in the market price for Resaca common stock. The history of similar stock split combinations for companies in like circumstances is varied. There is no assurance that:

        The market price of Resaca common stock will also be based on performance of Resaca and other factors, some of which are unrelated to the number of shares outstanding. If the Reverse Stock Split is effected and the market price of Resaca common stock declines, the percentage decline as an absolute number and as a percentage of the overall market capitalization of Resaca may be greater than would occur in the absence of a Reverse Stock Split. Furthermore, the liquidity of Resaca common stock could be adversely affected by the reduced number of shares that would be outstanding after the Reverse Stock Split. In addition, the Reverse Stock Split could result in some Resaca shareholders owning "odd lots" of less than one hundred (100) shares of the Resaca common stock on a post-split basis. Odd lots may be more difficult to sell, or may require greater transaction costs per share to sell than do "board lots" of even multiples of one hundred (100) shares.

The fairness opinion obtained by Cano from its financial advisor will not reflect changes in circumstances between the date of the merger agreement and the dates of either the shareholder meetings or the consummation of the merger.

        On September 29, 2009, the date upon which Cano and Resaca entered into the merger agreement, RBC rendered its opinion to the Cano board of directors that, based on RBC's experience as investment bankers, as of that date and subject to the various assumptions and limitations set forth in its opinion, the exchange ratio in the merger of 2.1 shares of Resaca common stock for each share of Cano common stock (which does not give effect to the Reverse Stock Split) is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Cano common stock. RBC's opinion spoke only as of the date it was rendered, was based on the conditions as they existed and information which RBC had been supplied as of such date, and was without regard to any market, economic, financial, legal or other circumstances or events of any kind or nature which may exist or occur after such date. All analyses performed by RBC for purposes of rendering its opinion were performed based on market information available as of September 28, 2009, the last trading day preceding the date of RBC's opinion, except as otherwise noted in the description of RBC's analyses in "The Merger—Opinion of Cano's Financial Advisor" beginning on page I-94.

        As a result, RBC's opinion does not reflect any information that was not supplied to RBC as of the date of its opinion, including information that has become available since that date that may have affected the financial projections supplied to RBC or any assumptions made by RBC for purposes of its opinion. For example, RBC's opinion does not reflect changes in the operations and prospects of

I-58


Table of Contents

Resaca or Cano or general market and economic conditions since the date of RBC's opinion, the January 2010 sale of certain of Cano's Texas Panhandle assets or the information contained in the December 31, 2009 Haas reports, nor does it reflect the current terms of the financing of the merger (including any potential dilution resulting from the antidilution protections to be provided to the recipients of the Resaca preferred stock in connection with the offering), in either case as a result of the passage of time or developments regarding the merger. In addition, in rendering its opinion, RBC was not aware of the Reverse Stock Split and did not consider any effect of the Reverse Stock Split. The opinion only addresses the fairness, from a financial view, of the exchange ratio to the holders of Cano common stock as of the date of RBC's opinion, and not as of any other date. More current information that has become or becomes available during the period between the date of RBC's opinion and the date of either the Resaca annual meeting of shareholders or the Cano special meeting of stockholders or the consummation of the merger may alter the value of Resaca or Cano, either on a stand-alone basis or after giving effect to the merger, or the prices of shares of Resaca common stock or Cano common stock. Nevertheless, Resaca shareholders and Cano stockholders may want to consider more current information, including the more current information regarding Resaca, Cano and the merger set forth or referred to in this proxy statement.

        As of the date of this proxy statement, Cano has not obtained an updated fairness opinion from RBC or any other financial advisor. Cano does not anticipate asking its financial advisor to update its opinion, and RBC has not undertaken to reaffirm or revise its opinion or otherwise comment on events occurring after the date of its opinion and does not have an obligation to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion.

        For a more detailed discussion of RBC's opinion, please see "The Merger—Opinion of Cano's Financial Advisor" beginning on page I-94.


Risks Relating to the Combined Company After the Merger

Upon completion of the merger, our combined debt may limit our financial and operating flexibility.

        We have a firm commitment from UBNA and Natixis, to arrange the New Facility in the maximum amount of $90 million with financial institutions acceptable to us and to UBNA and Natixis. The New Facility shall be guaranteed by all of Resaca's and Cano's existing and future material subsidiaries. Upon consummation of the merger and completion of the offering, the combined company anticipates having between $34.0 million and $57.5 million in borrowings under the New Facility. This amount may change depending on the amount of proceeds raised in the offering and the corresponding amount of debt repaid from such proceeds. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Resaca—Our New Facility" on page III-54.

        The New Facility shall contain, among other terms, provisions for the maintenance of certain financial ratios and certain restrictions related to (i) debt, (ii) liens, (iii) mergers, (iv) asset sales, (v) investments, (vi) change of ownership, (vii) distributions, redemptions and purchase of Resaca common stock and Resaca preferred stock, and (viii) hedging transactions. The New Facility shall be secured by 80% of the value of the combined company's existing and future oil and gas properties. The New Facility will require us to maintain compliance with specified financial ratios and satisfy certain financial condition tests. The combined company's ability to comply with these ratios and financial condition tests may be affected by events beyond its control, and we cannot assure you that the combined company will meet these ratios and financial condition tests. These financial ratio restrictions and financial condition tests could limit the combined company's ability to obtain future financings, make needed capital expenditures, withstand a future downturn in its business or the economy in general or otherwise conduct necessary or desirable corporate activities.

        A breach of any of these covenants or the combined company's inability to comply with the required financial ratios or financial condition tests could also result in a default under the New

I-59


Table of Contents


Facility. A default, if not cured or waived, could result in all of the combined company's indebtedness becoming immediately due and payable. If that should occur, the combined company may not be able to pay all such debt or to borrow sufficient funds to refinance it. Please read "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Combined Company" for further information regarding the combined company's future compliance with these covenants.

        The substantial debt of the combined company following the merger could have important consequences for the combined company and its shareholders. For example, it could:

Realization of any of these factors could adversely affect the combined company's financial condition.

The combined company may not have sufficient funds to fulfill the approximately $45 million capital expenditures currently planned for the twelve months following the merger due to its current contractual obligations.

        Following the merger, we expect to have current contractual obligations of approximately $129.0 million consisting of Resaca debt of $35.0 million, Cano debt of $65.9 million ($50.9 million of first lien debt and $15.0 million of subordinated debt) and Resaca preferred stock of $28.1 million (as of May 28, 2010). Immediately following the offering and closing of the New Facility, the combined company anticipates repaying all $35.0 million of Resaca's debt obligations and all $65.9 million of Cano's debt obligations with proceeds from the offering and borrowings under the New Facility. In addition, the combined company intends to use proceeds of the offering to pay between $8.1 million and $9.6 million of expenses related to the offering, the New Facility and financial advisor fees. After giving effect to the above transactions and based on Resaca and Cano debt balances as of May 28,

I-60


Table of Contents


2010, the combined company anticipates having between approximately $32.5 million and $56.0 million of available borrowing capacity under the New Facility, estimated as follows:

Amounts in millions

Sources   Uses  
 
  $50 million
stock
offering
  $75 million
stock
offering
   
  $50 million
stock
offering
  $75 million
stock
offering
 

Proceeds from the Offering

  $ 50.0   $ 75.0  

Offering fees

  $ 3.0   $ 4.5  

Borrowings under New Facility(B)

    57.5     34.0  

New Facility fees and expenses

    2.3     2.3  

Cash on hand

    1.5     1.5  

Repay Cano 1st lien debt

    50.9     50.9  

             

Repay Cano subordinated debt

    15.0     15.0  

             

Repay existing Resaca debt facility

    35.0     35.0  

             

Financial Advisor fees

    2.3     2.3  

             

Severance costs(1)

         

             

Miscellaneous

    0.5     0.5  
                       

Total Sources

  $ 109.0   $ 110.5  

Total Uses

  $ 109.0   $ 110.5  

New Facility Borrowing Base(A)

  $ 90.0   $ 90.0                  

Availability Under New Facility(A)-(B)

  $ 32.5   $ 56.0                  

(1)
Cash severance costs of approximately $1.9 million will be paid six months following the closing of the merger.

        To the extent that net proceeds from the offering do not exceed $50 million, the combined company may not have sufficient borrowings under its New Facility to adequately fund its current expected capital expenditures.

The combined company may not have the funds that it needs to redeem the Resaca preferred stock outstanding at its maturity date.

        The Resaca preferred stock is subject to mandatory redemption at its maturity date. The holders of the Resaca preferred stock have the option to convert the Resaca preferred stock to Resaca common stock through the maturity date of October 6, 2012. If any Resaca preferred stock remains outstanding on October 6, 2012, then Resaca is required to redeem the Resaca preferred stock in cash equal to the stated value of the Resaca preferred stock, plus accrued dividends and paid-in-kind dividends. The combined company expects to finance the redemption of outstanding Resaca preferred stock, if any, on October 6, 2012, through a combination of cash on hand, available debt borrowings and/or equity issuances but there can be no assurances that that the combined company will be able to finance the redemption as anticipated. At such time, the combined company may not have sufficient cash on hand to finance the redemption. Also, at such time, debt borrowings may not be available and/or the combined company may not be able to complete an equity issuance to finance the redemption of Resaca preferred stock.

I-61


Table of Contents


If the combined company cannot obtain sufficient capital when needed, the combined company will not be able to continue with its business strategy as currently contemplated.

        The combined company's business strategy includes developing and acquiring interests in mature oil fields with established primary and/or secondary reserves that may possess significant remaining upside exploitation potential by implementing various secondary and/or tertiary EOR techniques. The combined company's capital expenditures are estimated to total approximately $45 million during the twelve months following the merger. We plan to fund these capital expenditures with cash on hand, cash flow from operations and availability under the New Facility. After giving effect to the offering and the transactions described on page I-60, the combined company anticipates having between $33 and $56 million of available borrowing capacity under the New Facility. If the proceeds from the offering are less than $50 million, we project that over the next twelve months following the merger we will need to raise funds in addition to fully utilizing all available borrowings under the New Facility in order to fund the combined company's development activities and working capital needs. The combined company's ability to raise additional capital will principally depend on the status of the capital and loan markets and the combined company's results of operations at the time it seeks such capital. Accordingly, the combined company may not be able to obtain financing in sufficient amounts or on acceptable terms when needed, which could lead to a decline in our oil and natural gas reserves and could adversely affect its operating results and prospects. If we cannot raise the capital required to implement our business strategy, we may be required to curtail operations or develop a different strategy, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Future financings to provide this capital may dilute the combined company's shareholders' proportionate ownership in the combined company. Further, any debt financing must be repaid and the preferred stock must be redeemed regardless of whether or not it generates profits or cash flows from its business activities.

The combined company may be unable to compete effectively with larger companies, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

        The oil and natural gas industry is intensely competitive, and the combined company will compete with other companies that have greater resources than the combined company. The combined company's ability to acquire additional properties and to develop reserves in the future will be dependent upon its ability to evaluate and select suitable properties and to consummate transactions in a highly competitive environment. These companies may be able to pay more for productive oil and natural gas properties and exploratory prospects or define, evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of properties and prospects than the combined company's financial or human resources will permit. In addition, these companies may have a greater ability to continue exploration and development activities during periods of low oil and natural gas market prices and to absorb the burden of present and future federal, state, local and other laws and regulations. The combined company's inability to compete effectively with larger companies could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

The combined company will incur significant charges and expenses as a result of the merger and the offering which will reduce the amount of capital available to fund its operations.

        The proceeds of the offering and future available borrowings under the New Facility will be reduced by an aggregate of approximately $4.6 million of costs related to the merger and an aggregate of approximately $3.5 to $5.0 million of costs related to the offering. These expenses will include investment banking, legal, accounting and reserve engineering fees, underwriters' fees and commissions, printing costs, transition costs, and other related charges. In addition, the combined company will be required to pay approximately $1.9 million of separation payments to Cano's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer six months following the merger. The combined company may also incur

I-62


Table of Contents


unanticipated costs in the merger and/or the offering. As a result, the combined company will have less capital available to fund its exploitation and development activities.

Following the merger, the combined company will be subject to potential early repayments as well as restrictions pursuant to the terms of its preferred stock, which may adversely impact its operations.

        Pursuant to the terms of our preferred stock to be issued to the holders of Cano preferred stock upon the closing of the merger, if a "triggering event" occurs, the holders of Cano preferred stock will have the right to require us to redeem their Cano preferred stock at a price of at least 125% of the $1,000 per share stated value of the Resaca preferred stock plus accrued dividends, which was approximately $35.2 million in the aggregate as of May 28, 2010. "Triggering Events" include the following:

        There is no guarantee that the combined company would be able to repay the amounts due under the preferred stock upon the occurrence of a Triggering Event. The source of funds required as a result of any redemption of preferred stock upon a Triggering Event, include increased borrowing base, term debt, new preferred and common equity.

        In addition, the combined company will be prohibited from issuing any additional preferred stock that is senior or on par with the preferred stock with regard to dividends or liquidation without the approval of holders of a majority of the preferred stock.

Approximately 70% of the combined company's total estimated proved reserves at December 31, 2009, on a pro forma combined basis, were proved undeveloped reserves and may ultimately prove to be less than estimated.

        Recovery of proved undeveloped reserves requires significant capital expenditures and successful drilling operations. At December 31, 2009, approximately 40.5 MMBOE of the combined company's total estimated proved reserves were undeveloped. The reserve data included in the Resaca and Cano reserve engineer reports assume that substantial capital expenditures are required to develop non-producing reserves. The combined company's reserve report at December 31, 2009 assumes it will spend $290.1 million through December 31, 2014 to develop the combined company's estimated proved undeveloped reserves as of December 31, 2009, including an estimated $38.7 million in calendar year 2010, $4.0 million of which had been incurred at March 31, 2010. Subsequent to the calculations of our December 31, 2009 reserve report, we deferred approximately $15.0 million of planned calendar year 2010 development capital expenditures related to undeveloped reserves due to the timing of the

I-63


Table of Contents


merger. Although cost and reserve estimates attributable to our natural gas and crude oil reserves have been prepared in accordance with industry standards, we cannot be sure that the estimated costs are accurate, that development will occur as scheduled or that the results of such development will be as estimated. For a more detailed discussion of the combined company's liquidity, please read "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Resaca—Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Combined Company" beginning on page III-50 of this proxy statement.

The combined company could incur liability in connection with Cano's ongoing securities litigation.

        On October 2, 2008, a lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, against David W. Wehlmann; Gerald W. Haddock; Randall Boyd; Donald W. Niemiec; Robert L. Gaudin; William O. Powell, III and the underwriters of the June 26, 2008 public offering of Cano common stock, which we refer to as the 2008 Cano Offering, alleging violations of the federal securities laws. Messrs. Wehlmann, Haddock, Boyd, Niemiec, Gaudin and Powell were Cano outside directors on June 26, 2008. At the defendants' request, the case was transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

        On July 2, 2009, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint that added as defendants Cano, Cano's Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, S. Jeffrey Johnson, Cano's former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Morris B. "Sam" Smith, Cano's current Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Benjamin L. Daitch, Cano's Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer, Michael Ricketts and Cano's Senior Vice President of Engineering and Operations, Patrick McKinney, and dismissed Gerald W. Haddock, a former director of Cano, as a defendant. The amended complaint alleges that the prospectus for the 2008 Cano Offering contained statements regarding Cano's proved reserve amounts and standards that were materially false and overstated Cano's proved reserves. The plaintiffs sought to certify the lawsuit as a class action lawsuit; however, the case was dismissed prior to the issue of class certification being addressed.

        On July 27, 2009, the defendants moved to dismiss the lawsuit. On December 3, 2009, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas granted motions to dismiss all claims brought by the plaintiffs. On December 18, 2009, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. On April 5, 2010, Cano filed its appellate brief in support of its position. On April 19, 2010, the plaintiffs filed their response brief. Cano is cooperating with its directors and officers liability insurance carrier regarding the defense of the lawsuit. We believe that the potential amount of losses resulting from this lawsuit in the future, if any, will not exceed the policy limits of Cano's directors' and officers' insurance. We currently believe that the potential amount of losses resulting from this lawsuit in the future, if any, will not exceed the policy limits of Cano's directors' and officers' insurance. If Cano is not successful in this litigation, Cano's liability could have a material adverse impact on the combined company's results of operations.

The combined company could incur liability in connection with Cano's litigation relating to a fire that occurred on March 12, 2006 in Carson County, Texas.

        Cano and certain of its subsidiaries were defendants in several lawsuits relating to a fire that occurred on March 12, 2006 in Carson County, Texas and remain defendants in one of the lawsuits. With regard to the one remaining lawsuit, on June 21, 2007, the judge of the 100th Judicial District Court issued a Final Judgment (a) granting motions for summary judgment in favor of Cano and certain of its subsidiaries on plaintiffs' claims for (i) breach of contract/termination of an oil and gas lease and (ii) negligence; and (b) granting the plaintiffs' no-evidence motion for summary judgment on contributory negligence, assumption of risk, repudiation and estoppel affirmative defenses asserted by Cano and certain of its subsidiaries.

I-64


Table of Contents

        This final judgment was appealed and a decision was reached on March 11, 2009, as the Court of Appeals for the Tenth District of Texas in Amarillo affirmed in part and reversed in part the ruling of the 100th Judicial District Court. The Court of Appeals (a) affirmed the trial court's granting of summary judgment in Cano's favor for breach of contract/termination of an oil and gas lease and (b) reversed the trial court's granting of summary judgment in Cano's favor on plaintiffs' claims of Cano's negligence. The Court of Appeals ordered the case remanded to the 100th Judicial District Court. On March 30, 2009, the plaintiffs filed a motion for rehearing with the Court of Appeals and requested a rehearing on the affirmance of the trial court's holding on the plaintiffs' breach of contract/termination of an oil and gas lease claim. On June 30, 2009, the Court of Appeals ruled to deny the plaintiff's motion for rehearing. On August 17, 2009, Cano filed an appeal with the Texas Supreme Court to request the reversal of the Court of Appeals ruling regarding potential negligence. On December 11, 2009, the Texas Supreme Court declined to hear Cano's appeal. Therefore, this case will be remanded to the district court for trial on the negligence claims. The case has been set for trial on November 2, 2010.

        The remaining plaintiff alleges damages to land and livestock, certain expenses related to fighting the fire and remedial expenses totaling approximately $1.7 million to $1.8 million. In addition the remaining plaintiff seeks termination of certain oil and natural gas leases, reimbursement of attorneys' fees and exemplary damages. Currently, known aggregate actual damage claims are approximately $1.8 million. However, the plaintiff has not provided actual damage claims for all of its claims. These actual damage claims do not include the additional claims by the plaintiff for attorneys' fees and exemplary damages, the potential amounts of which cannot be reasonably estimated. There is no remaining insurance coverage for the Cano fire litigation. Cano may not prevail in court or on further appeal or be able to settle the remaining lawsuit on acceptable terms. If Cano is not successful in this litigation, Cano's liability could have an adverse impact on the combined company's results of operations.

Business issues currently faced by one company may be imputed to the operations of the other company.

        To the extent that either Resaca or Cano currently has or is perceived by customers to have operational challenges such as on-time performance, safety issues or workforce issues, those challenges may raise concerns by existing customers of the other company following the merger which may limit or impede the combined company's future ability to obtain additional work from those customers.

If the combined company is unable to replace the reserves that it has produced, its reserves and revenues will decline.

        The combined company's future success depends on its ability to find, develop and acquire additional oil and gas reserves that are economically recoverable which, in itself, is dependent on oil and gas prices. Without continued successful exploitation, acquisition or exploration activities, the combined company's reserves and revenues will decline as a result of its current reserves being depleted by production. The combined company may not be able to find or acquire additional reserves at acceptable costs. The combined company's ability to make the necessary capital investments to maintain or expand its asset base of oil and natural gas reserves would be impeded to the extent cash flow from operations is reduced and external sources of capital become limited or unavailable.

The combined company may not be able to fully execute its acquisition growth strategy if it encounters illiquid capital markets or increased competition for acquisition opportunities.

        The growth strategy of the combined company contemplates expansion into new assets with similar characteristics. The combined company intends to broaden its portfolio of assets into other long-life, mature U.S. oil and gas basins. In the longer-term, the combined company is also seeking to expand its portfolio of assets outside the United States. The combined company intends to concentrate on

I-65


Table of Contents


properties with strong upside potential from secondary and tertiary recovery from existing PDP, PDNP and PUD, and probable reserves.

        The combined company may require substantial new capital to finance the future acquisition and development of assets and businesses. Limitations on the combined company's access to capital will impair its ability to execute this strategy. Expensive capital will limit the combined company's ability to acquire and develop attractive assets. The combined company may not be able to raise the necessary funds on satisfactory terms, if at all.

        In addition, the combined company may experience increased competition for acquisition opportunities. Increased competition for a limited pool of assets could result in the combined company losing to other bidders more often or acquiring assets at higher prices. Either occurrence would limit the combined company's ability to fully execute its acquisition growth strategy. The combined company's inability to execute its growth strategy may materially adversely impact the market price of its securities.

The combined company may not be successful in acquiring, exploiting or developing oil and gas properties.

        The successful acquisition, exploitation or development of, or exploration for, oil and gas properties requires an assessment of recoverable reserves, future oil and gas prices and operating costs, potential environmental and other liabilities, and other factors. These assessments are necessarily inexact. As a result, the combined company may not recover the purchase price of a property from the sale of production from the property, or may not recognize an acceptable return from properties it does acquire. In addition, the combined company's exploitation and development operations may not result in any increases in reserves. The combined company's operations may be curtailed, delayed or canceled as a result of:

        In addition, exploitation and development costs may greatly exceed initial estimates. In that case, the combined company would be required to make unanticipated expenditures of additional funds to develop these projects, which could materially adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.

        Estimates of oil and gas reserves depend on many assumptions. Any material changes in those assumptions could adversely affect the quantity and value of the combined company's oil and gas reserves.

The combined company may not be able to successfully integrate any acquired businesses and business acquisitions may substantially increase the combined company's indebtedness and contingent liabilities.

        The combined company's ability to successfully execute its growth strategy is dependent in part upon successfully executing on acquisition opportunities. As a result, from time to time, the combined company will evaluate and acquire assets and businesses that it believes complement its existing operations. Similar to the risks associated with integrating Resaca's operations with Cano's operations, the combined company may be unable to integrate successfully businesses it acquires in the future. The combined company may incur substantial expenses or encounter delays or other problems in connection with its growth strategy that could negatively impact its results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. Moreover, acquisitions and business expansions involve numerous risks, including:

I-66


Table of Contents

        If consummated, any acquisition or investment would also likely result in the incurrence of indebtedness and contingent liabilities and an increase in interest expense and depreciation, depletion and amortization expenses. As a result, the combined company's capitalization and results of operations may change significantly following an acquisition. A substantial increase in the combined company's indebtedness and contingent liabilities could have a material adverse effect on its business.

The geographic concentration of the combined company's oil and gas reserves may have a greater effect on its ability to sell its oil and gas compared to larger, more geographically diverse companies and may make the combined company more sensitive to price volatility.

        After the merger, all of the combined company's reserves will consist of oil and gas reserves in Texas, New Mexico and Oklahoma. Because the combined company's reserves are not as diversified geographically as many of its larger, more geographically diverse competitors, its business is more subject to local conditions than other, more diversified companies. Any regional events, including price fluctuations, natural disasters, oil and gas processing or transportation interruptions, and restrictive regulations, that increase costs, reduce availability of equipment or supplies, reduce demand or limit the combined company's production may impact its operations more than if its reserves were more geographically diversified. For example, if a hurricane strikes certain areas of the Texas Gulf Coast, the price received for the combined company's natural gas may be negatively impacted due to the temporary closure of natural gas pipelines or natural gas liquids processing plants in the region impacted by the hurricane.

The combined company's acquisition strategy could fail or present unanticipated problems for its business in the future, which could adversely affect its ability to make acquisitions or realize anticipated benefits of those acquisitions.

        The combined company's growth strategy may include acquiring oil and gas businesses and properties. Resaca may not be able to identify suitable acquisition opportunities or finance and complete any particular acquisition successfully. Furthermore, acquisitions involve a number of risks and challenges, including:

Any of these factors could adversely affect the combined company's ability to achieve anticipated levels of cash flows from its acquired businesses or realize other anticipated benefits of those acquisitions.

I-67


Table of Contents


The combined company intends to continue hedging a portion of its production, which may result in it making cash payments or prevent it from receiving the full benefit of increases in prices for oil and gas.

        Resaca and Cano reduce their respective exposure to the volatility of oil and gas prices by actively hedging a portion of their production. Hedging also prevents Resaca and Cano from receiving the full advantage of increases in oil or gas prices above the fixed amount specified in the hedge agreement. In a typical hedge transaction, it is anticipated that the combined company will have the right to receive from the hedge counterparty the excess of the fixed price specified in the hedge agreement over a floating price based on a market index, multiplied by the quantity hedged. If the floating price exceeds the fixed price, the combined company will be required to pay the counterparty this difference multiplied by the quantity hedged even if the combined company were to have insufficient production to cover the quantities specified in the hedge agreement. Accordingly, if the combined company has less production than it has hedged when the floating price exceeds the fixed price, it will be required to make payments against which there are no offsetting sales of production. If these payments become too large, the remainder of the combined company's business may be adversely affected. In addition, the combined company's hedging agreements will expose it to risk of financial loss if the counterparty to a hedging contract defaults on its contract obligations.

Loss of key executives and failure to attract qualified management could limit the combined company's growth and negatively impact its operations.

        Successfully implementing the combined company's strategies will depend, in part, on its management team. The loss of members of its management team could have an adverse effect on its business. The combined company's exploitation success and the success of other activities integral to its operations will depend, in part, on its ability to attract and retain experienced engineers, geoscientists and other professionals. Competition for experienced professionals is extremely intense. If the combined company cannot attract or retain experienced technical personnel, its ability to compete could be harmed.

        It is currently contemplated that J.P. Bryan will serve as the Chief Executive Officer of the combined company until the combined company can complete an executive search and hire a Chief Executive Officer. It may take up to one year or more to complete this process, and there can be no assurance that the company will find qualified candidates on terms acceptable to its board of directors.

Loss of the combined company's relationship with Torch Energy Advisors and its affiliates could negatively impact its operations.

        Resaca currently has an Amended and Restated Agreement for Administrative Services dated January 1, 2009, which we refer to as the Services Agreement, and an Amended and Restated Co-Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2009, which we refer to as the Co-Employment Agreement, with Torch, an affiliate of Resaca and its Chairman of the Board, J.P. Bryan, and Chief Executive Officer, John J. Lendrum, III, for the provision of operational, accounting and financial services, as well as the promotion of benefits and other services to Resaca's employees. Under the terms of these agreements, Resaca utilizes certain employees and assets of Torch and its affiliates in its business. If the relationship with Torch or any of its affiliates were to be terminated, this could have a negative impact on the combined company's ability to function effectively pending the replacement of such Torch employees and assets. If Torch is unable to perform its obligations under the Services Agreement, or if Torch is unable to perform its obligations under the Co-Employment Agreement or other agreements with Resaca, this could have a negative impact on the combined company's ability to function effectively pending the replacement of these services.

I-68


Table of Contents


Resales of shares of Resaca common stock following the merger and additional obligations to issue shares of Resaca common stock may cause the market price of Resaca common stock to fall.

        As of March 31, 2010, approximately 96.9 million shares of Resaca common stock were outstanding and approximately 5.0 million shares of Resaca common stock were subject to outstanding options, restricted stock awards, and other rights to purchase or acquire its shares. Resaca currently expects that it will issue approximately 19.3 million shares of Resaca common stock in connection with the merger. The issuance of these new shares of Resaca common stock, the sale of additional shares of Resaca common stock that may become eligible for sale in the public market from time to time upon exercise of options or vesting of restricted stock awards and any future issuances of common stock as consideration for future acquisitions and investments could have the effect of depressing the market price for shares of Resaca common stock.

The trading price of shares of Resaca common stock after the merger may be affected by factors different from those affecting the price of shares of Cano common stock or shares of Resaca common stock before the merger.

        When we complete the merger, holders of Cano common stock will become holders of Resaca common stock. The results of operations of Resaca, as well as the trading price of Resaca common stock, after the merger may be affected by factors different from those currently affecting Resaca's or Cano's results of operations and the trading price of Cano common stock. For a discussion of the businesses of Resaca and Cano and of certain factors to consider in connection with those businesses, see "Business & Financial Information of Resaca and Cano" beginning on pages III-1.

If the Rig Acquisition is not approved by the Resaca shareholders, then the combined company will have to unwind the Rig Acquisition, return the Rig Assets and locate other acceptable assets to replace them.

        Resaca's board has approved the Rig Acquisition and submitted the matter for shareholder approval at its annual meeting. If the shareholders do not ratify and approve the Rig Acquisition, the combined company will unwind the transaction, return the Rig Assets and real property to PBWS and receive the shares of Resaca common stock tendered as payment for the Rig Assets. Without the Rig Assets, the combined company would have to negotiate a new lease on office space, a rig yard in or around Odessa, Texas, lease or purchase comparable rigs and enter into an operating agreement with PBWS or another third party to operate the rigs. There can be no assurance that the combined company would be able to obtain comparable assets on similar terms, if at all, in the current market. The failure of the combined company to procure comparable assets could adversely affect its operations and drilling program.

If Resaca identifies differences between its accounting policies and those of Cano upon consummation of the merger, conforming those differences in accounting policies could have a material impact on the combined company's financial statements.

        The integration of Cano with Resaca will involve developing and implementing uniform accounting policies, internal controls and procedures, disclosure controls and procedures and other governance policies and standards. Upon consummation of the merger, Resaca will review Cano's accounting policies. As a result of that review, Resaca may identify differences between the accounting policies of the two companies that, when conformed, could have a material impact on the combined company's financial statements.

I-69


Table of Contents


The borrowing base under the New Facility may be reduced below the amount of our outstanding borrowings under that facility.

        The amount we are able to borrow under the New Facility is determined based on the value of our proved oil and natural gas reserves and is based on oil and natural gas price assumptions that vary by individual lender. Our borrowing base is subject to redetermination twice each year in February and August with the option for one additional redetermination during the interval between each scheduled redetermination and additional redeterminations based upon certain material dispositions. Should there be a deficiency in the amount of our borrowing base in comparison to our outstanding debt under the New Facility, we would be required to repay any such deficiency in five equal monthly installments, beginning 30 days after the notice of redetermination. If we were unable to make those repayments, we would be in default under the New Facility, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

The present value of future net cash flows from Resaca's and Cano's proved reserves may not be the same as the current market value of Resaca's and Cano's estimated crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids, which we refer to as NGLs, reserves.

        In accordance with the requirements of the SEC, the estimated discounted future net cash flows from our proved reserves are based on prices and costs on the date of the estimate, held flat for the life of the properties. Actual future prices and costs may differ materially from those used in the present value estimate. The present value of future net revenues from our proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 was based on a NYMEX price of $69.89 per barrel for crude oil and NYMEX natural gas prices of $3.84 per MMBtu for Resaca and $3.71 per MMBtu for Cano on June 30, 2009.

        If crude oil prices were $1.00 per Bbl lower than the price used, Resaca's standardized measure as of June 30, 2009 would have decreased from $136.2 million to $133.1 million, and Cano's standardized measure as of June 30, 2009 would have decreased from $282.0 million to $275.1 million. If natural gas prices were $0.10 per MMBtu lower than the price used, Resaca's standardized measure as of June 30, 2009, would have decreased from $136.2 million to $135.8 million, Cano's standardized measure as of June 30, 2009, would have decreased from $282.0 million to $279.6 million. Any adjustments to the estimates of proved reserves or decreases in the price of crude oil or natural gas may decrease the value of shares of Resaca common stock.

        In accordance with the requirements of the SEC, the estimated discounted future net cash flows from our proved reserves are based on prices and costs on the date of the estimate, held flat for the life of the properties. Actual future prices and costs may differ materially from those used in the present value estimate. The present value of future net revenues from our proved reserves as of December 31, 2009 was based on a NYMEX price of $79.39 per barrel for crude oil and NYMEX natural gas price of $5.82 per MMBtu.

        Actual future net cash flows will also be affected by increases or decreases in oil and gas demand and changes in governmental regulations or taxation. The timing of both the production and the incurrence of expenses in connection with the development and production of oil and natural gas properties affects the timing of actual future net cash flows from proved reserves. In addition, the 10% discount factor, which is required by the SEC to be used in calculating discounted future net cash flows for reporting purposes, is not necessarily the most appropriate discount factor. The effective interest rate at various times and the risks associated with the combined company's business or the oil and gas industry in general will affect the accuracy of the 10% discount factor.

        The discounted future net revenues included in this proxy statement should not be considered as the market value of the reserves attributable to our properties. The estimated discounted future net revenues from proved reserves are generally based on prices and costs as of the date of the estimate,

I-70


Table of Contents


while actual future prices and costs may be materially higher or lower. Actual future net revenues will also be affected by factors such as:

        In addition, the 10% discount factor, which the SEC requires to be used to calculate discounted future net revenues for reporting purposes, is not necessarily the most appropriate discount factor based on the cost of capital in effect from time to time and risks associated with the combined company's business and the oil and gas industry in general. Actual net revenues may be materially higher or lower.

Resaca's and Cano's estimated reserves are based on many assumptions that may prove inaccurate. Any material inaccuracies in these reserve estimates or underlying assumptions will materially affect the quantities and present value of the combined company's reserves.

        No one can measure underground accumulations of oil and natural gas in an exact way. Oil and natural gas reserve engineering requires subjective estimates of underground accumulations of oil and natural gas and assumptions concerning future oil and natural gas prices, production levels, and operating and development costs. As a result, estimated quantities of proved reserves and projections of future production rates and the timing of development expenditures may prove to be inaccurate. Additionally, prior to the completion of the merger, Cano's proved reserve estimates were prepared each year at June 30th by Miller and Lents, Ltd. Upon completion of the merger, Haas Petroleum Engineering Services, Inc., which we refer to as Haas, will prepare the combined company's future reserve reports. Any material inaccuracies in Resaca's or Cano's existing reserve estimates, underlying assumptions or material differences in Haas' estimates of proved reserves acquired from Cano will materially affect the quantities and present value of the combined company's reserves, which could adversely affect the combined company's business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

        The proved oil and gas reserve information included in this proxy statement represents only estimates. These estimates are based on reports prepared by independent petroleum engineers. The estimates were calculated using oil and gas prices in effect on the date indicated in the reports. Any significant price changes will have a material effect on the quantity and present value of the combined company's reserves.

        Petroleum engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and gas that cannot be measured in an exact manner. Estimates of economically recoverable oil and gas reserves and future net cash flows depend upon a number of variable factors and assumptions, including:

I-71


Table of Contents

        Because all reserve estimates are to some degree subjective, each of the following items may differ materially from those assumed in estimating reserves:

        Furthermore, different reserve engineers may make different estimates of reserves and cash flows based on the same available data. Actual production, revenues and expenditures with respect to reserves will vary from estimates and the variances may be material. For example, our combined company's reserve report at December 31, 2009 assumes we will spend approximately $51 million on development capital expenditures during calendar year 2010 to develop estimated proved nonproducing and proved undeveloped reserves. As a result of the timing of the closing of the merger, approximately $15 million of development capital expenditures have been deferred from calendar year 2010. On a combined basis, we expect to spend approximately $36 million on development capital expenditures through calendar year 2010, $4 million of which had been incurred at March 31, 2010. In addition, our combined company's reserve report at December 31, 2009 also assumes that the combined company will have sufficient liquidity to meet capital needs of its development plan, which will require approximately $331 million through December 31, 2004 to develop the combined company's estimated undeveloped proved reserves as of December 31, 2009.

The combined company's business will depend on gathering and transportation facilities owned by others. Any limitation in the availability of those facilities would interfere with the combined company's ability to market the oil and natural gas that it produces.

        The marketability of the combined company's oil and natural gas production will depend in part on the availability, proximity and capacity of gathering and pipeline systems owned by third parties. The amount of oil and natural gas that can be produced and sold is subject to curtailment in certain circumstances, such as pipeline interruptions due to scheduled and unscheduled maintenance, excessive pressure, physical damage to the gathering or transportation system, or lack of contracted capacity on such systems. The curtailments arising from these and similar circumstances may last from a few days to several months. In many cases, the combined company will be provided only with limited, if any, notice as to when these circumstances will arise and their duration. Any significant curtailment in gathering system or pipeline capacity, or significant delay in the construction of necessary gathering and transportation facilities, could adversely affect the combined company's business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

Our ability to use net operating loss carryovers to offset future taxable income may be limited.

        As a result of the issuance of our common stock in the merger and the offering, we expect the combined company's federal income tax net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards to be subject to the ownership change limitation provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. This will result in a limitation on the use of NOL carryforwards to a specified amount per year. The company expects to be able to fully utilize these existing NOL carryforwards in future years. However, there can be no certainty that any of the combined company's NOL carryforwards will be utilized by the combined company in the future.

If the waterflood project at the Cockrell Ranch Unit of the Panhandle Properties is not successful, the aggregate reserves of the Panhandle Properties would be significantly reduced or eliminated.

        Cano is currently undertaking a waterflood project at the Cockrell Ranch Unit on 62 injection wells and 71 producing wells on 1,023 developed acres. Production has increased from roughly 10

I-72


Table of Contents


BOEPD to over 100 BOEPD since the initial phase of the project was started in July of 2007. A number of conformance issues, caused by using prior injectors that were open-hole completed, has limited the rate of project response. Cano has embarked on an active isolation program to address these issues and retained a third-party engineering firm to perform simulation modeling. This isolation program and modeling is expected to be finalized by, and cost a remaining $250,000 through, June 30, 2010. Once completed, it is felt that waterflood production growth will more closely track the analog East Schafer Ranch response profile. Under the analogous East Schafer Ranch profile, the Cockrell Ranch Unit production would increase from the current levels of 100 BOEPD to approximately 700 BOEPD or roughly 10 BOEPD per producing well within the next 18 to 24 months after completion. The Cockrell Ranch unit contains 456 MBOE of PDP reserves based on actual performance to date and 725 MBOE of remaining PUD reserves. Should the project response at the Cockrell Ranch not match the expectations for the PUD reserve profile, the reserves for this project area would be significantly reduced or eliminated. Moreover, a complete failure at the Cockrell Ranch Unit waterflood would impair the PUD reserve calculations for the properties immediately adjacent to the Cockrell Ranch, and could partially impair the remainder of the Panhandle Properties.


Risks Relating to the Oil and Gas Industry

Volatile oil and gas prices could adversely affect the combined company's financial condition and results of operations.

        The combined company's success is largely dependent on oil and gas prices, which are extremely volatile. Any substantial or extended decline in the price of oil and gas below current levels will have a material adverse effect on its business operations and future revenues. Moreover, oil and gas prices depend on factors the combined company cannot control, such as:

With respect to the combined company's business, prices of oil and gas will affect:

Any prolonged, substantial reduction in the demand for oil and gas, or distribution problems in meeting this demand, could adversely affect the combined company's business.

        The combined company's success is materially dependent upon the demand for oil and gas. The availability of a ready market for its oil and gas production depends on a number of factors beyond its control, including the demand for and supply of oil and gas, the availability of alternative energy

I-73


Table of Contents


sources, the proximity of reserves to, and the capacity of, oil and gas gathering systems, pipelines or trucking and terminal facilities. The combined company may also have to shut-in some of its wells temporarily due to a lack of market or adverse weather conditions. If the demand for oil and gas diminishes, the combined company's financial results would be negatively impacted.

        In addition, there are limitations related to the methods of transportation for the combined company's production. Substantially all of the combined company's oil and gas production is transported by pipelines and trucks owned by third parties. The inability or unwillingness of these parties to provide transportation services to the combined company for a reasonable fee could result in it having to find transportation alternatives, increased transportation costs or involuntary curtailment of a significant portion of its oil and gas production, any of which could have a negative impact on its results of operation and cash flows.

Resaca's and Cano's estimates of proved reserves and related PV-10 and standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, which were prepared and presented under applicable SEC rules, may change materially as a result of new SEC rules that will go into effect for fiscal years ending on or after December 31, 2009.

        This proxy statement presents estimates of Resaca's and Cano's proved reserves and related PV-10 and standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009. The combined company will begin complying with the disclosure requirements of the final rule in its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2010. These estimates do not include the effect of the SEC's revised oil and gas rules, "Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting," issued in December 2008, which is effective for annual reports on Forms 10-K for fiscal years ending on or after December 31, 2009 and registration statements filed after such date. The revised SEC rules include changes to the pricing used to estimate reserves, the ability to include nontraditional resources in reserves, the use of new technology for determining reserves and permitted disclosure of probable and possible reserves. The estimated proved reserves, future net revenues and PV-10 presented at December 31, 2009 were determined using SEC rules in effect for fiscal years prior to December 31, 2009, including the use of end of the period prices for oil and natural gas as of December 31, 2009, which were $79.39 per barrel of oil and $5.82 per MMBtu of natural gas instead of an unweighted average 12-month price, calculated as the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12-month period ended December 31, 2009, of $61.18 per Bbl for oil and $3.87 per MMBtu for natural gas under the new SEC rules. Haas estimates that, had the combined company applied unweighted 12-month average pricing at December 31, 2009 under the SEC's revised rules, the combined company's proved reserves would have decreased by 1.7 MMBOE, which is a reduction of 3% as compared to proved reserves of 57.5 MMBOE using December 31, 2009 flat pricing. Haas estimates that utilizing the unweighted 12-month average pricing at December 31, 2009 would have reduced the PV-10 value of the combined company's proved reserves by $404.9 million or 52% as compared to PV-10 value of proved reserves of $773.5 million using December 31, 2009 flat pricing. Beginning June 30, 2010, the combined company will be required to prepare its reserve estimates using the definitions and pricing required by the SEC's revised rules.

        Another impact of the new SEC rules is a general requirement that, subject to limited exceptions, proved undeveloped reserves may only be booked if they relate to wells scheduled to be drilled within five years of the date of booking. This new rule may reduce a portion of the combined company's estimated proved undeveloped reserves at December 31, 2009, and may limit our potential to book additional proved undeveloped reserves. Moreover, we may be required to write down our proved undeveloped reserves if we do not develop those reserves within the required five-year timeframe. The impact of the SEC's revised rules on the combined company's estimates, and in particular the combined company's estimates of its proved undeveloped reserves, could be material.

I-74


Table of Contents


Enhanced oil recovery, or EOR, techniques that we may use, such as CO2 flooding and alkali-surfactant-polymer flooding, involve more risk than traditional water flooding.

        EOR techniques such as CO2 injection and alkali-surfactant-polymer, or ASP, chemical injection involve significant capital investment and an extended period of time, generally a year or longer, from the initial phase of a pilot program until increased production occurs. In addition, the results of any successful pilot program may not be indicative of actual results achieved in a broader EOR project in the same field or area. Generally, CO2 and ASP injection are regarded as involving more risk than traditional water flood operations. Our ability to effectively utilize EOR projects to convert probable reserves to proved reserves and achieve commercial production is contingent upon many uncertainties associated with our use of EOR technology, including CO2 and ASP technologies, geological uncertainties, chemical and equipment availability, rig availability and many other factors.

Operating hazards, natural disasters or other interruptions of the combined company's operations could result in potential liabilities, which may not be fully covered by its insurance.

        The oil and gas business involves certain operating hazards such as:

        Consistent with insurance coverage generally available to the industry, the combined company's insurance policies provide limited coverage for losses or liabilities. The insurance market in general and the energy insurance market in particular have been difficult markets over the past several years. As a result, Resaca and Cano do not believe that insurance coverage for the full potential liability, especially environmental liability, is currently available at a reasonable cost. If the combined company incurs substantial liability and the damages are not covered by insurance or are in excess of policy limits, or if it incurs liability at a time when it is not able to obtain liability insurance, then its business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Decommissioning costs could exceed the value of remaining reserves.

        The combined company may become responsible for costs associated with abandoning and reclaiming wells, facilities and pipelines which it may use for production of oil and gas. Abandonment and reclamation of facilities and the costs associated therewith is often referred to as "decommissioning." Should decommissioning be required, the costs of decommissioning may exceed the value of reserves remaining at any particular time to cover such decommissioning costs. The combined company may have to draw on funds from other sources to satisfy such costs. The use of other funds to satisfy such decommissioning costs could have a material adverse effect on the combined company's financial position and future results of operations.

Governmental agencies and other bodies might impose regulations that increase the combined company's costs and may terminate or suspend its operations.

        The combined company's business is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations as interpreted by governmental agencies and other bodies vested with much authority relating to the

I-75


Table of Contents


exploration for, and the development, production and transportation of, oil and gas, as well as environmental and safety matters. Existing laws and regulations could be changed, and any changes could increase costs of compliance and costs of operating drilling equipment or significantly limit drilling activity.

        Under certain circumstances, the United States Minerals Management Service may require that the combined company's operations on federal leases be suspended or terminated. These circumstances include the combined company's failure to pay royalties or its failure to comply with safety and environmental regulations. The requirements imposed by these laws and regulations are frequently changed and subject to new interpretations.

Environmental liabilities could adversely affect the combined company's financial condition.

        The oil and gas business is subject to environmental hazards, such as oil spills, gas leaks and ruptures and discharges of petroleum products and hazardous substances, and historic disposal activities. These environmental hazards could expose the combined company to material liabilities for property damages, personal injuries or other environmental harm, including costs of investigating and remediating contaminated properties. In addition, the combined company also may be liable for environmental damages caused by the previous owners or operators of properties it has purchased or is currently operating. A variety of stringent federal, state and local laws and regulations govern the environmental aspects of the combined company's business and impose strict requirements for, among other things:

        Any noncompliance with these laws and regulations could subject the combined company to material administrative, civil or criminal penalties or other liabilities. Additionally, the combined company's compliance with these laws may, from time to time, result in increased costs to its operations or decreased production, and may affect its costs of acquisitions.

        In addition, environmental laws may, in the future, cause a decrease in the combined company's production or cause an increase in its costs of production, development or exploration. Pollution and similar environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. See "Business & Financial Information of Resaca and Cano—Business and Properties—Regulation—Governmental Regulation—Environmental Regulations" on page III-25.

Certain U.S. federal income tax deductions currently available with respect to oil and gas exploration and development may be eliminated as a result of future legislation.

        President Obama's Proposed Fiscal Year 2010 Budget includes proposed legislation that would, if enacted into law, make significant changes to United States tax laws, including the elimination of certain key U.S. federal income tax incentives currently available to oil and natural gas exploration and production companies. These changes include, but are not limited to, (i) the repeal of the percentage depletion allowance for oil and natural gas properties, (ii) the elimination of current deductions for intangible drilling and development costs, (iii) the elimination of the deduction for certain domestic production activities, and (iv) an extension of the amortization period for certain geological and geophysical expenditures. It is unclear whether any such changes will be enacted or how soon any such changes could become effective. The passage of any legislation as a result of these proposals or any

I-76


Table of Contents


other similar changes in U.S. federal income tax laws could eliminate certain tax deductions that are currently available with respect to oil and gas exploration and development, and any such change could negatively affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Climate change legislation or regulations restricting emissions of "greenhouse gases" could result in increased operating costs and reduced demand for the oil and natural gas that we produce.

        On December 15, 2009, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") officially published its findings that emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and other "greenhouse gases" present an endangerment to human health and the environment because emissions of such gases are, according to the EPA, contributing to warming of the Earth's atmosphere and other climatic changes. These findings by the EPA allow the agency to proceed with the adoption and implementation of regulations that would restrict emissions of greenhouse gases under existing provisions of the federal Clean Air Act. In late September 2009, the EPA had proposed two sets of regulations in anticipation of finalizing its findings that would require a reduction in emissions of greenhouse gases from motor vehicles and that could also lead to the imposition of greenhouse gas emission limitations in Clean Air Act permits for certain stationary sources. In addition, on September 22, 2009, the EPA issued a final rule requiring the reporting of greenhouse gas emissions from specified large greenhouse gas emission sources in the United States beginning in 2011 for emissions occurring in 2010. In March 2010, the EPA announced a proposed rulemaking that would expand its final rule on reporting of GHG emissions to include owners and operators of onshore oil and natural gas production facilities. If the proposed rule is finalized in its current form, reporting of GHG emissions from such facilities would be required on an annual basis beginning in 2012 for emissions occurring in 2011. The adoption and implementation of any regulations imposing reporting obligations on, or limiting emissions of greenhouse gases from, our equipment and operations could require us to incur costs to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases associated with our operations or could adversely affect demand for the oil and natural gas that we produce.

        Also, on June 26, 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the "American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009," or "ACESA," which would establish an economy-wide cap-and-trade program to reduce U.S. emissions of greenhouse gases including carbon dioxide and methane. ACESA would require a 17% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from 2005 levels by 2020 and just over an 80% reduction of such emissions by 2050. Under this legislation, the EPA would issue a capped and steadily declining number of tradable emissions allowances to certain major sources of greenhouse gas emissions so that such sources could continue to emit greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. These allowances would be expected to escalate significantly in cost over time. The net effect of ACESA will be to impose increasing costs on the combustion of carbon-based fuels such as oil, refined petroleum products, and natural gas. The U.S. Senate has begun work on its own legislation for restricting domestic greenhouse gas emissions and the Obama Administration has indicated its support of legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through an emission allowance system. Although it is not possible at this time to predict when the Senate may act on climate change legislation or how any bill passed by the Senate would be reconciled with ACESA, any future federal laws or implementing regulations that may be adopted to address greenhouse gas emissions could require us to incur increased operating costs and could adversely affect demand for the oil and natural gas that we produce.

The adoption of derivatives legislation by Congress could have an adverse impact on our ability to hedge risks associated with our business.

        Congress is currently considering legislation to impose restrictions on certain transactions involving derivatives, which could affect the use of derivatives in hedging transactions. ACESA contains provisions that would prohibit private energy commodity derivative and hedging transactions. ACESA would expand the power of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or CFTC, to regulate

I-77


Table of Contents


derivative transactions related to energy commodities, including oil and natural gas, and to mandate clearance of such derivative contracts through registered derivative clearing organizations. Under ACESA, the CFTC's expanded authority over energy derivatives would terminate upon the adoption of general legislation covering derivative regulatory reform. The Chairman of the CFTC has announced that the CFTC intends to conduct hearings to determine whether to set limits on trading and positions in commodities with finite supply, particularly energy commodities, such as crude oil, natural gas and other energy products. The CFTC also is evaluating whether position limits should be applied consistently across all markets and participants. In addition, the Treasury Department recently has indicated that it intends to propose legislation to subject all OTC derivative dealers and all other major OTC derivative market participants to substantial supervision and regulation, including by imposing conservative capital and margin requirements and strong business conduct standards. Derivative contracts that are not cleared through central clearinghouses and exchanges may be subject to substantially higher capital and margin requirements. Although it is not possible at this time to predict whether or when Congress may act on derivatives legislation or how any climate change bill approved by the Senate would be reconciled with ACESA, any laws or regulations that may be adopted that subject us to additional capital or margin requirements relating to, or to additional restrictions on, our trading and commodity positions could have an adverse effect on our ability to hedge risks associated with our business or on the cost of our hedging activity.

Federal and state legislation and regulatory initiatives relating to hydraulic fracturing could result in increased costs and additional operating restrictions or delays.

        Congress is currently considering legislation to amend the federal Safe Drinking Water Act to require the disclosure of chemicals used by the oil and gas industry in the hydraulic fracturing process. Hydraulic fracturing involves the injection of water, sand and chemicals under pressure into rock formations to stimulate natural gas production. Sponsors of bills currently pending before the Senate and House of Representatives have asserted that chemicals used in the fracturing process could adversely affect drinking water supplies. The proposed legislation would require the reporting and public disclosure of chemicals used in the fracturing process, which could make it easier for third parties opposing the hydraulic fracturing process to initiate legal proceedings based on allegations that specific chemicals used in the fracturing process could adversely affect groundwater. These bills, if adopted, could establish an additional level of regulation at the federal level that could lead to operational delays or increased operating costs and could result in additional regulatory burdens that could make it more difficult to perform hydraulic fracturing and increase our costs of compliance and doing business. In addition, in March 2010, the EPA announced its intention to conduct a comprehensive research study on the potential adverse impacts that hydraulic fracturing may have on water quality and public health. Thus, even if the pending bills are not adopted, the EPA study, depending on its results, could spur further initiatives to regulate hydraulic fracturing under the SDWA.


Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock

The market price of our common stock could be volatile due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control.

        The market price of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a number of factors, most of which we cannot control, including:

I-78


Table of Contents

        In recent years, the securities market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market price of securities issued by many companies for reasons unrelated to the operating performance of these companies. Future market fluctuations may result in a lower price of our shares of common stock and could make it difficult for you to resell shares of our common stock at attractive prices.

The rights granted to holders of the Resaca preferred stock may restrict the combined company's ability to raise additional equity capital and adversely affect the rights of holders of Resaca common stock.

        The issuance of shares of Resaca preferred stock by Resaca's board of directors in connection with the merger may adversely affect the rights of the holders of Resaca common stock. For example, Resaca preferred stock issued by Resaca shall rank superior to the Resaca common stock as to dividend rights and liquidation preference, shall have preferred voting rights and is convertible into shares of Resaca common stock. Accordingly, the issuance of shares of Resaca preferred stock may discourage bids for Resaca common stock or may otherwise adversely affect the market price of Resaca common stock. In addition, the holders of Resaca preferred stock have certain rights that may restrict Resaca's ability to raise additional equity capital. For example, the holders of Resaca preferred stock have a preemptive right to participate in up to 30% of any future offering of equity securities of Resaca, except for issuances of excluded securities (as defined in "Description of Resaca Capital Stock—Resaca Preferred Stock—Adjustments to Conversion Price" on page I-139) and Resaca common stock in the offering, including but not limited to a firm commitment underwritten offering with gross proceeds in excess of $50 million and issuances in connection with strategic acquisitions. Also, for the first nine (9) months following the initial issuance date of the Resaca preferred stock, without the prior written consent of a majority of the holders of Resaca preferred stock, Resaca may not issue Resaca common stock (excluding issuances of certain excluded securities) for which it receives proceeds (net of offering expenses, discounts and fees) of more than $50 million at a gross price per share below the market price of $0.7941 per share (which does not reflect the Reverse Stock Split). For a more detailed description of the rights granted to the holders of Resaca preferred stock, please refer to "Description of Resaca Capital Stock—Resaca Preferred Stock—Adjustments to Conversion Price" on page I-139 and "The Merger—Investors Rights Agreement with Holders of Resaca Preferred Stock—Additional Issuances of Resaca Equity" beginning on page I-114.

Our certificate of formation and bylaws discourage unsolicited takeover proposals and could prevent you from realizing a premium for your common stock.

        Our certificate of formation and bylaws contain provisions that could delay, defer or prevent a tender offer or takeover attempt that a shareholder might consider to be in such shareholder's best interest, including those attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for the shares held by shareholders, and may make removal of the incumbent management and directors more

I-79


Table of Contents


difficult, which, under certain circumstances, could reduce the market price of our common stock. These provisions include:

        Together, these provisions may discourage transactions that otherwise could involve payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for your common stock.

We may issue additional equity securities, which would dilute existing ownership interests.

        We may issue equity in the future in connection with capital raising, debt exchanges, acquisitions, strategic transactions or for other purposes.

        The issuance of additional equity securities may have the following effects:

We may issue shares of preferred stock with greater rights than our common stock

        Our board of directors can, without approval of our shareholders, issue one or more series of preferred stock and determine the number of shares of each series and the rights, preferences and limitations on each series. The issuance of shares of preferred stock may adversely affect the rights of the holders of our common stock. For example, any preferred stock issued may rank ahead of our common stock as to dividend rights, liquidation preferences or voting rights, and may be convertible into shares of our common stock. As a result, the issuance of shares of preferred stock may discourage bids for our common stock or may otherwise adversely affect the market price of our common stock. See "Description of Resaca Capital Stock—Resaca Preferred Stock" beginning on page I-138.

I-80


Table of Contents

THE MERGER

        The following is a discussion of the merger and the material terms of the merger agreement among Resaca, Cano and Merger Sub. You are urged to read carefully the merger agreement in its entirety, a copy of which is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement and incorporated by reference herein. Unless stated otherwise, all information in this proxy statement, including but not limited to share calculations and the exchange ratio in the merger, is presented as if the Resaca shareholders have approved, and Resaca has implemented immediately prior to the merger, the Reverse Stock Split.


General

        Pursuant to the merger agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into Cano, with Cano being the surviving entity and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resaca following the merger.

        In the merger, each share of Cano common stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.42 shares of Resaca common stock (after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split) and each share of Cano preferred stock will be converted into the right to receive one share of Resaca preferred stock. This equates to $1.67 per Cano common share, calculated based on the September 28, 2009 closing price of Resaca common stock on the AIM of U.K. £0.50, which, after applying an assumed exchange rate of U.S. $1.5882 per British pound and after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split, equates to $3.9705 per Resaca common share. Immediately after the merger is completed, but immediately prior to the completion of the offering, Cano common stockholders will own approximately 50% of the common stock of the combined company, and the Resaca shareholders will own the remaining approximately 50%.

        The merger is expected to qualify as a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. Accordingly, the merger is expected to be tax-free to the Cano stockholders to the extent they receive Resaca common stock or Resaca preferred stock in the merger.


Background of the Merger

        As part of the ongoing oversight and management of Cano's business, the board and management regularly review Cano's results of operations, prospects, and strategic direction. In November 2008, the Cano board received presentations from several investment banking firms relative to their analysis of Cano's operations, assets and financial condition. In its November 24, 2008 presentation to the Cano board, RBC identified several alternatives that could be available to Cano, including continuing the business as usual, a sale of the company, merger opportunities, and the potential acquisition of properties with producing reserves to balance the company's portfolio. On November 24, 2008, the Cano board established a strategic initiatives committee to review strategic initiatives available to Cano and report back to the board.

        In December 2008, Cano formally retained RBC as its financial advisor pursuant to an engagement letter dated December 5, 2008 (which letter was later superseded by a new engagement letter with RBC dated May 6, 2009) to review and evaluate strategic options that could increase stockholder value.

        Between March and July 2009, Cano entered into confidentiality agreements with six companies, including Resaca, interested in discussing potential transactions with Cano. Cano had discussions with each of these companies regarding various potential strategic transactions, but discussions with only two of the potential counterparties progressed to the point that they were considered by the Cano board, as some of these potential counterparties determined not to further pursue a transaction, while others desired to pursue transactions involving only certain of Cano's assets and/or operations or preferred a cash transaction that, in management's opinion, did not represent an appropriate valuation of Cano given then-current commodity prices.

I-81


Table of Contents

        In early March 2009, Cano's Chief Executive Officer, S. Jeffrey Johnson, met with Resaca's Chairman of the Board, J.P. Bryan, along with representatives of RBC, in Dallas, Texas. Mr. Johnson and Mr. Bryan discussed their respective companies and the general terms of a potential merger.

        On March 30, 2009, Resaca and Cano management, together with their respective financial advisors, met in Houston, Texas to discuss the possibility of a merger of the two companies and how the parties might proceed with their respective due diligence reviews. Resaca and Cano management continued these discussions in Fort Worth, Texas on March 31, 2009.

        On April 22, 2009, Resaca and Cano management met in Houston, Texas to further discuss complementary synergies of the two companies and how the parties might proceed with their respective due diligence reviews.

        On April 29, 2009, members of Cano and Resaca management met in Dallas, Texas with Haas Petroleum Engineering Services, Inc. to discuss Resaca's oil and gas reserves.

        On May 4, 2009, Mr. Bryan met with Mr. Johnson in Fort Worth, Texas and discussed the general terms of a potential merger.

        On May 6, 2009, at a meeting of the Resaca board, senior management briefed the board on the results of merger discussions with Cano.

        On May 7, 2009, at a meeting of the Cano board, senior management briefed the board on the results of discussions with the various parties that had been interested in exploring potential transactions with Cano. At the same meeting, representatives of RBC made a presentation to the board on the status of the acquisition and divestiture market and alternatives that could be available to Cano at that time. RBC advised the Cano board on the likelihood of any alternative in light of the current state of the debt and equity markets. Though management was directed to continue to be open to other strategic options, such as a merger or the purchase of properties with producing reserves, the Cano board officially terminated the strategic initiatives committee at this meeting.

        On May 11, 2009, Mr. Johnson met with Mr. Bryan and Resaca's Chief Executive Officer, John J. Lendrum, III in Houston, Texas. Messrs. Johnson, Bryan and Lendrum discussed the general terms of a potential merger and how a merger might be structured, including which company would maintain its public listing. They also had preliminary discussions regarding the exchange ratio to be used in a merger of the two companies.

        On May 13, 2009, Mr. Lendrum met with Sylvia Barnes of Madison Williams regarding a potential engagement of Madison Williams as Resaca's financial advisor.

        On May 15, 2009, Madison Williams was formally retained as exclusive financial advisor to Resaca with respect to the merger.

        On May 21, 2009, Messrs. Bryan, Johnson and Lendrum had a telephone conference in which they discussed the current status of the merger negotiations.

        On May 22, 2009, management of both Cano and Resaca, together with their financial advisors, met in Houston. The parties continued discussions of the general terms of a potential merger and how a merger might be structured. Cano management described the relevant rights of its preferred stockholders in the event of a merger, including, in some cases, the right under certain circumstances to require the company to redeem all of the Cano preferred stock for cash.

        On May 26, 2009, management representatives of both Cano and Resaca, including the parties' respective in-house counsel, had further discussions regarding deal structure. They also discussed due diligence issues and procedures. Resaca instructed its outside counsel, Haynes and Boone LLP, which we refer to as Haynes and Boone, to draft a proposed merger agreement.

I-82


Table of Contents

        On May 27, 2009, Resaca and Cano management representatives conducted a field inspection of some of Resaca's properties and some of Cano's properties.

        On June 1, 2009, management of both Cano and Resaca, together with their outside legal counsel, discussed by phone the rights of Cano's preferred stockholders in the event of a merger and how those rights might vary depending on the transaction structure. The following day Cano opened its data room to Resaca for due diligence purposes. On June 3, 2009, Resaca opened its data rooms to Cano for due diligence purposes.

        On June 5, 2009, management of both Cano and Resaca, together with certain lenders of Resaca, discussed possible refinancing scenarios for Resaca's and Cano's credit facilities.

        The following week, Cano entered into confidentiality agreements with two potential financing partners and with another party interested in a strategic business combination, which we refer to as the other bidder. Cano began exploring potential transactions with these parties and also continued its discussions with Resaca concerning due diligence, transaction structure, and related matters.

        On June 8, 2009, Mr. Bryan sent a term sheet to Cano outlining the terms and structure of a potential transaction. On June 9, 2009, the Cano board met with management to discuss the term sheet received from Resaca. On June 10, 2009, representatives of Cano's board spoke by phone with Mr. Bryan to clarify certain aspects of Resaca's term sheet. Then on June 11, 2009, the Cano board met without management present to evaluate the needs of the company and alternatives available to it. The board concluded that to carry out the company's business plan and meet its financial obligations, either a strategic combination or an equity financing transaction was necessary, and that in addition to pursuing a strategic combination, management should explore potential financing transactions given the limitations in the market, in general, and for Cano, in particular, with respect to size, structure, use of proceeds and timing.

        In response to this Cano board directive, Cano management reviewed financing options, as well as pertinent requirements of the NYSE Amex and restrictions contained in the certificate of designations establishing Cano's preferred stock. Transactions under review by management included a common equity issuance, a convertible preferred refinancing and/or exchange, restructured credit facilities, a rights offering and other financial options including joint ventures and similar transactions.

        On June 18, 2009, another bidder made contact with Mr. Johnson regarding a potential merger opportunity. On June 19, 2009, the other bidder sent an email to Mr. Johnson outlining prospective transactional terms and considerations.

        On June 18, 2009, Resaca's outside counsel, Haynes and Boone, delivered to Cano's outside counsel, Thompson & Knight LLP, which we refer to as Thompson & Knight, a proposed merger agreement between Cano and Resaca.

        On June 19, 2009, Mr. Bryan sent a letter to Mr. Johnson regarding capital expenditures in response to requests for information from the Cano board of directors.

        On June 22, 2009, Mr. Bryan sent a letter to Mr. Johnson setting forth his proposed business strategy for the combined company and recommendations regarding the process for further negotiations between the parties. Mr. Johnson forwarded the letter to the Cano board.

        Between June 22 and June 25, 2009, Messrs. Bryan and Johnson had ongoing discussions regarding the exchange ratio and other terms of the merger agreement.

        On June 25, 2009, Cano management met with the other bidder to discuss the potential terms of a merger with that company. On the same day, Mr. Bryan advised Mr. Johnson by phone that Resaca was terminating all further discussions of a possible merger of Cano and Resaca. Resaca also advised its board of directors of the termination of further merger discussions with Cano.

I-83


Table of Contents

        On June 26, 2009, the Cano board met and management advised the board of recent developments, including the status of the potential transaction with the other bidder. RBC made a presentation to the Cano board regarding the status of the discussions with the other bidder. The board also heard a presentation from management regarding potential equity financing options for the company given the overall market and current market capitalization of Cano. The board directed management to move forward with due diligence and negotiation of a transaction with the other bidder, but also directed management to prepare to conduct an equity issuance or rights offering in the event the merger negotiations were unsuccessful.

        During July and the first part of August 2009, Cano and the other bidder continued conducting their respective due diligence reviews and negotiating the terms of a merger agreement. The Cano board was briefed on the progress of the transaction with the other bidder at meetings held on August 17, 2009 and August 27, 2009. At the Cano board meeting on August 27, the board discussed the other bidder's desire to attempt to raise additional capital before announcing a transaction with Cano. The Cano board directed management to continue working with the other bidder, but also to continue preparing for an equity issuance in the event an agreement with the other bidder could not be reached.

        On September 2, 2009, the Chief Executive Officer of the other bidder advised Garrett Smith, a member of Cano's board, and Mr. Johnson that the other bidder had not yet been successful in its efforts to raise additional capital. On the same day, Mr. Smith and Mr. Bryan spoke about a potential transaction between Cano and Resaca. Mr. Bryan expressed interest in resuming merger discussions.

        On September 4, 2009, the Cano board and management had a telephonic conference at which the board was briefed on the status of the transaction with the other bidder as well as the possibility of resuming negotiations with Resaca. Cano management provided the Cano board with an analysis of Resaca's reserves and liquidity. RBC presented to the board a comparison of a merger with Resaca versus an equity issuance by Cano. The Cano board directed management to resume merger negotiations with Resaca.

        On September 8, 2009, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Bryan met in Colorado Springs, Colorado to discuss the structure and terms of a possible merger. On the same day, Thompson & Knight delivered to Haynes and Boone a revised draft of the proposed merger agreement and Cano management continued its due diligence review of Resaca's operations. Resaca management also resumed its due diligence review of Cano's operations.

        On September 10, 2009, Mr. Bryan and other Resaca officers met with some of Cano's directors to discuss the terms of a possible merger. Mr. Bryan and the other Resaca officers also met with Cano's management to discuss governance of the combined company and potential business opportunities that would be available to the combined company.

        On September 11, 2009, Resaca's management met with representatives of Madison Williams to discuss the terms of a possible merger with Cano, including the exchange ratio.

        On September 14 and 15, 2009, representatives of Cano and Resaca management, together with their outside counsel, held calls to discuss the optimum structure of the transaction in light of the companies' respective valuations and the redemption rights that could be available to Cano's preferred stockholders. On September 16, 2009, a team of Cano executives visited Resaca's offices to conduct further due diligence.

        The Cano board met on September 17, 2009 to discuss the status of the Resaca transaction. Management briefed the board on the progress of due diligence and the major business points still at issue. The board established a strategic initiatives and pricing committee made up of Messrs. Johnson, Smith and Pully to negotiate with Resaca and the other bidder, evaluate any other potential strategic transactions and serve as a pricing committee in the event Cano needed to move forward with an

I-84


Table of Contents


equity offering. Also on that day, the other bidder advised Cano that it was formally terminating discussions of a possible merger or rights offering with Cano.

        On September 18, 2009, Cano and Resaca management, together with their respective legal and financial advisors, discussed by phone various structural and business issues. These discussions continued on September 21 at a meeting in Houston where the parties reached agreement that after the merger, Cano would become a subsidiary of Resaca and Resaca would become listed on the NYSE Amex. The parties also agreed that they would seek the waiver by Cano's preferred stockholders of redemption and certain other rights that might be available to the preferred stockholders as a result of the agreed-upon merger structure, and that if such a waiver could not be obtained, the agreed-upon merger structure would not be viable. The parties determined to approach D.E. Shaw Laminar Portfolios, L.L.C., Cano's largest preferred stockholder, subject to appropriate confidentiality safeguards, to seek support for the merger transaction. On September 22, 2009, Cano entered into a confidentiality agreement with D.E. Shaw in anticipation of substantive discussions seeking D.E. Shaw's support of the merger transaction.

        During the week of September 21, 2009, Cano and Resaca negotiated the terms of the merger agreement. These discussions included the scope of representations, warranties and covenants contained in the agreement, the operating restrictions imposed on each company during the period between signing and the closing of the merger, the parties' ability to consider other acquisition proposals and terminate the merger agreement to pursue such proposals, and the amount and circumstances under which a party would be obligated to pay the other a termination fee. During the course of these negotiations, the amount of the termination fee was reduced from $5 million to $3.5 million. The parties also discussed the proposed separation agreements between Cano and two of its executive officers.

        On September 22, 2009, Resaca conducted a due diligence review of Cano's operations in Fort Worth, Texas.

        On September 24, 2009, Cano's management and board representatives, Resaca's management, and their respective legal advisors had further discussions regarding unresolved business and contractual issues, including issues relating to the merger agreement and to the executive separation agreements. Messrs. Smith and Lendrum negotiated tentative resolutions of the remaining issues, including a tentative agreement on the exchange ratio to be used in the merger.

        On September 25, 2009, Resaca's board met telephonically, together with Resaca executive management, its outside counsel, Haynes and Boone, and its financial advisor, Madison Williams, to review and approve the merger and the merger agreement. In advance of the meeting, the directors were provided with various documents, including copies of the draft merger agreement and a detailed written presentation from Madison Williams regarding its analysis of the merger. At the meeting, representatives of Haynes and Boone reviewed the terms of the merger agreement and other relevant legal matters, including the Resaca board's fiduciary duties with respect to its consideration of the proposed transaction. Management presented the results of its due diligence review of Cano, including a review of its outstanding litigation and insurance coverage. Management and Haynes and Boone also updated the directors on the status of discussions with D.E. Shaw and the status of negotiations regarding the Cano executive separation agreements. The Resaca board emphasized the importance of obtaining satisfactory executive separation agreements with Cano's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Madison Williams presented its analysis of the pro forma financial and strategic impact on Resaca of the proposed merger. After lengthy discussion, the Resaca board unanimously approved the Merger and the Share Issuances, subject to resolution of the Cano executive separation agreements, and continued negotiation of the exchange ratio, and resolved to recommend both to Resaca's shareholders for approval pending the outcome of such matters.

I-85


Table of Contents

        On September 25, 2009, Cano's board met telephonically to review the status of the negotiations. In advance of the meeting, the directors were provided with various documents, including copies of the draft merger agreement and a detailed summary of the merger agreement. The directors were also provided with updated financial information regarding the merger prepared by RBC. Thompson & Knight advised the board regarding the board's fiduciary duties with respect to its consideration of the proposed transaction. At the meeting, the Cano board discussed the terms of the merger agreement and other relevant legal matters, the status of discussions with D.E. Shaw and the status of negotiations regarding the executive separation agreements. The Cano board emphasized the importance of obtaining the support of D.E. Shaw before signing the merger agreement. Following the meeting, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Pully had further discussions with D.E. Shaw regarding the merger, including the terms of the new Resaca preferred stock that would be issued in exchange for the Cano preferred stock. Also, Mr. Smith and another Cano director, Don Niemiec, had further discussions with Mr. Bryan and Mr. Lendrum regarding various outstanding issues, including the exchange ratio and issues relating to the executive separation agreements.

        On September 26, 2009, the Cano board again met telephonically. Management and outside legal counsel updated the board on the changes that had been made to the merger agreement and the differences from the detailed summary provided by Thompson & Knight the day before. Management and outside counsel then advised the board on the status of the executive separation agreements, including the concessions being requested by Resaca, as well as the progress of discussions with D.E. Shaw. The board concluded that the company should seek a voting agreement from D.E. Shaw. After the board's discussions with management and RBC, it was determined that an equity offering would provide the Cano stockholders with less value than the potential merger with Resaca. The Cano board came to this conclusion primarily due to (i) the significant dilution any potential equity offering would likely have with respect to Cano's existing stockholders, given the then-current trading price of Cano common stock and Cano's financial position and (ii) constraints on the amount and timing of any equity offering by Cano imposed by the terms of the Cano preferred stock and SEC and NYSE Amex rules. Since no other potential strategic transactions had been presented to the strategic initiatives and pricing committee since its inception, other than potential transactions with Resaca and the other bidder, and since the board had determined not to proceed with an equity offering, the board terminated the committee. The Cano board then established a new executive committee comprised of Messrs. Smith, Pully and Niemiec to coordinate and conduct final negotiations with Resaca on behalf of Cano with respect to the merger agreement, the executive separation agreements, and the agreement with D.E. Shaw. The executive committee was also authorized to consider alternative transactions presented to Cano and, if necessary, act as a pricing committee of the Cano board for any equity offerings.

        On September 28, 2009, members of the executive committee resumed discussions with D.E. Shaw regarding the conditions under which D.E. Shaw would agree to waive its right to request a cash redemption of its preferred stock upon the effectiveness of the merger. The executive committee then met with Mr. Bryan regarding proposed revisions to the terms of the preferred stock, including delaying the mandatory redemption date, reducing the conversion price, and providing the company with more flexibility to raise additional capital. Both Cano and Resaca discussed the proposed terms with their respective financial advisors, and further negotiated the impact that the revised Cano preferred stock terms should have on the exchange ratio in the merger.

        On September 28, 2009, Resaca management notified the Resaca board of changes to the merger agreement, including the exchange ratio. The Resaca board was also consulted on the proposed revisions to the terms of the Cano preferred stock.

        Later on September 28, the Cano board held a lengthy telephonic meeting to consider and tentatively approved the transaction. Management presented the results of its due diligence review of Resaca. RBC then presented its preliminary analysis regarding the exchange ratio in the merger,

I-86


Table of Contents


subject to further negotiation of the exchange ratio. The board was apprised of the few remaining issues, including finalizing the exchange ratio, the agreement with D.E. Shaw, and the separation agreements, and the Board expressed its inclination to approve the transaction subject to resolution of all of these matters.

        On September 29, 2009, the executive committee negotiated and reached final agreement with D.E. Shaw and entered into a stock voting agreement under which D.E Shaw agreed to vote in favor of the Cano Series D Amendment (which if adopted would eliminate certain rights of the Cano preferred stockholders arising from the merger) and in favor of the merger. The stock voting agreement also set forth the terms of the Resaca preferred stock that would be issued in the merger in exchange for the Cano preferred stock. Also on September 29, the separation agreements for Messrs. Johnson and Daitch were finalized and Cano agreed to the final exchange ratio of 2.1 shares of Resaca common stock (0.42 shares as adjusted for the Reverse Stock Split) for each share of Cano common stock. Resaca management notified the Resaca board of this final agreement on the exchange ratio and the terms of the Resaca preferred stock, and received final approval to proceed with the merger.

        Later on September 29, the Cano board met telephonically to formally consider and discuss the merger and related transactions. Management updated the board on the day's developments. RBC then reviewed with the Cano board of directors its financial analysis of the exchange ratio in the merger and rendered its oral opinion to the Cano board of directors, subsequently confirmed in writing, that based on RBC's experience as investment bankers, as of September 29, 2009 and subject to the various assumptions and limitations set forth in its opinion, the exchange ratio in the merger of 2.1 shares of Resaca common stock for each share of Cano common stock (which does not give effect to the Reverse Stock Split) was fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Cano common stock. The full text of RBC's written opinion, which sets forth material information relating to such opinion, including the assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the scope of review undertaken by RBC, is attached as Annex B to this proxy statement. For a more detailed discussion of RBC's opinion, please see "—Opinion of Cano's Financial Advisor" beginning on page I-94. Following further deliberations, and after consideration of the factors described under "—Cano's Reasons for the Merger," the board approved both the Cano Series D Amendment and the merger agreement unanimously (with the exception of Mr. Johnson, who abstained from both votes) and resolved to recommend both proposals to Cano's stockholders for approval.

        On September 29, 2009, the merger agreement was signed by all parties. Before the opening of the U.K. and U.S. financial markets on the morning of September 30, 2009, Cano and Resaca issued a joint press release announcing the signing of the merger agreement.


Resaca's Reasons for the Merger and the Share Issuances

        At their September 25, 2009 meeting, the members of the Resaca board of directors unanimously approved the merger. In consultation with its financial advisor, Madison Williams, the Resaca board believes that the merger agreement and the terms of the merger are in the best interests of Resaca and its shareholders. Therefore, the Resaca board recommends that Resaca's shareholders vote to approve the Merger and the Share Issuances. The Resaca Board continued to meet on September 28 and 29, 2009 to approve the final pricing and terms of the merger.

        In reaching its recommendation, the Resaca board consulted with Resaca's management, as well as its financial and legal advisors, and considered the following material factors:

I-87


Table of Contents

        In reaching its decision to recommend the merger to its shareholders, the Resaca board of directors also considered a number of additional factors, including:

I-88


Table of Contents

        The Resaca board also considered certain risks and potential disadvantages associated with the merger, including:

        Having considered these factors and the risks discussed under "Risk Factors" beginning on page I-54, the potential benefits of the merger outweigh these considerations in the judgment of the Resaca board. The foregoing discussion of the information and factors that were given weight by the Resaca board is not intended to be exhaustive, but it is believed to include all material factors considered by the Resaca board. Projections for Cano that Cano provided to Resaca were not material to the Resaca board's decision. The Resaca board of directors did not reach any specific conclusion with respect to any of the factors considered and instead conducted an overall analysis of such factors and determined that, in the aggregate, the potential benefits considered outweighed the potential risks or possible negative consequences of approving the Merger and the Share Issuances, the Reverse Stock Split and the Incentive Plan Amendment.

        In view of the variety of factors considered in connection with its evaluation of the proposed merger and the terms of the merger agreement, the Resaca board did not deem it practicable to quantify or assign relative weights to the factors considered in reaching its conclusion. In addition, individual Resaca directors may have given different weights to different factors.

I-89


Table of Contents


Recommendation of the Resaca Board of Directors

        At its meeting on September 25, 2009, after due consideration, the Resaca board of directors unanimously adopted resolutions:

        On April 1, 2010, after due consideration, the Resaca board of directors unanimously adopted resolutions:


Cano's Reasons for the Merger

        On September 29, 2009, Cano's board unanimously determined that the merger is fair to, and in the best interests of, Cano and its stockholders, approved and adopted the merger agreement and the merger, and resolved to recommend that Cano stockholders vote "FOR" approval of the merger agreement and the merger.

        In reaching its decision, Cano's board consulted with Cano's management, Cano's outside legal advisors, and RBC, Cano's financial advisor. In addition to those reasons stated above under "The Merger—Resaca's Reasons for the Merger and the Share Issuances," Cano's board of directors believes the merger is desirable for the following principal reasons:

I-90


Table of Contents

        Cano's board also identified and considered a number of potentially negative factors and risks in its deliberations concerning the merger, including but not limited to:

I-91


Table of Contents

        After deliberation, the Cano board of directors concluded that, on balance, the potential benefits of the merger to Cano stockholders outweighed these risks and potential disadvantages.

        Subsequent to the execution and delivery of the merger agreement, the Cano board of directors and members of its executive committee periodically discussed the merger in anticipation of the proxy statement being mailed to the Cano stockholders. In particular, the Cano board and the executive committee, from time to time, discussed that, given events occurring due to the passage of time and other events not considered by RBC at the time of the delivery of its fairness opinion to the Cano board of directors as discussed in this proxy statement, RBC's opinion does not take into account the totality of information that is now available, including: (1) Cano's sale in January 2010 of certain of its Texas Panhandle assets, (2) the proposed Reverse Stock Split upon consummation of the merger, (3) the specifics of the proposed common stock offering by Resaca to properly capitalize the combined company or any potential dilution to Cano common stockholders resulting from the antidilution protections to be provided to the recipients of Resaca preferred stock in connection with the offering, (4) the terms of the refinancing under the New Facility and (5) the December 31, 2009 report of Haas on the combined company's oil and gas reserves. As a result of these discussions, the Cano board determined that RBC's opinion with respect to the fairness of the exchange ratio still reflects meaningful and helpful information and a reasonable basis to continue to support the merger despite these events not being considered for purposes of the opinion. The Cano board made this determination because it and its executive committee had been regularly updated by Cano management and Resaca management on the terms of each of these developments throughout these processes and believe that: (i) the Cano Texas Panhandle asset sale involved an immaterial amount of Cano's properties, (ii) the Reverse Stock Split ultimately has no impact on the value of the shares of Resaca common stock or Resaca preferred stock to be received by Cano stockholders, and that the implementation of the Reverse Stock Split is necessary for the combined company to achieve a NYSE Amex listing and will provide the combined company with a per share price that would likely be more attractive to institutional investors, (iii) the dilution resulting from the offering will be shared pro rata by the Cano stockholders and the Resaca shareholders, (iv) the commitment letter and the New Credit Agreement relating to the New Facility contains terms which are in line with current market terms for similarly situated companies and (v) the information contained in the Haas mid-year reserve report did not reflect a material change in the value of the combined company's reserves. In addition, the Cano board believes that the time, expense and potential delay associated with obtaining an updated fairness opinion, in light of its views on these developments, outweighs any incremental value that an updated fairness opinion would provide and could potentially jeopardize the timing and ultimate consummation of the merger.

        The foregoing discussion of the information and factors considered by the Cano board of directors in making its decision is not intended to be exhaustive, but includes the material factors considered by the Cano board of directors. In view of the variety of material factors considered in connection with its evaluation of the merger, the Cano board of directors did not find it practicable to, and did not, quantify or otherwise assign relative or specific weight to any of these factors, and individual directors may have given different weight to different factors. Instead, the Cano board of directors made its determination based on the totality of the information presented to it.

        The above description of the Cano board of directors' considerations relating to the merger is forward-looking in nature. This information should be read in light of the factors discussed above under "Cautionary Statements Concerning Forward-Looking Statements" beginning on page I-52.

I-92


Table of Contents


Recommendation of the Cano Board of Directors

        At its meeting on September 29, 2009, after due consideration, the members of the Cano board of directors, who voted (Mr. Johnson, Cano's Chief Executive Officer, abstained from voting), unanimously adopted resolutions:

        In considering the recommendation of Cano's board of directors with respect to the merger, you should be aware that some officers and directors of Cano have interests in the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of Cano stockholders generally. Cano's board of directors was aware of these interests and considered them in approving the merger agreement and the merger. For more information on these interests, see "—Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger" beginning on page I-107.


Analysis of Financial Advisor to the Resaca Board of Directors

        Madison Williams acted as financial advisor to Resaca in connection with the proposed merger. Madison Williams was selected by the Resaca board of directors based on Madison Williams' qualifications, reputation and experience in the valuation of businesses and securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, in general, and oil and gas transactions in particular. Resaca engaged Madison Williams to (a) review the business and operations of Resaca and Cano and Cano's operations, historical performance, and projected financial condition, (b) evaluate and recommend financial terms with respect to the proposed merger, (c) assist Resaca in due diligence related to Cano, (d) analyze the pro forma financial and strategic impact on Resaca of the proposed merger, (e) advise Resaca as to the timing, structure, proposed purchase price, and form of consideration of the proposed merger, (f) assist in negotiating the financial aspects of the proposed merger under Resaca's guidance, and (g) provide such other financial advisory and investment banking services as are normal and customary for similar transactions and as mutually agreed upon by Resaca and Madison Williams. Resaca did not request, and Madison Williams has not provided Resaca, with a written fairness opinion in connection with the merger.

        Madison Williams reviewed the merger agreement and held discussions with certain members of the management of Resaca and Cano with respect to the financial aspects of the proposed merger, the past and current business operations of Resaca and Cano, the financial condition and future prospects and operations of Resaca and Cano, the effects of the proposed merger on the financial condition and future prospects of Resaca and certain other factors Madison Williams believed necessary or appropriate to its analysis of the pro forma financial and strategic impact on Resaca of the proposed merger. Madison Williams presented its analysis of the merger and its impact to the Resaca board of directors at its meeting held on September 25, 2009 and consulted with the Resaca board on September 28 and 29, 2009. At such times, the Resaca board reviewed Madison Williams' analysis with Madison Williams, and Madison Williams addressed questions raised by the Resaca board.

        Madison Williams' financial analysis was only one of many factors considered by the Resaca board of directors in its evaluation of the merger and should not be viewed as determinative of the views of the Resaca board or management with respect to the merger or the exchange ratio.

        Madison Williams has acted as exclusive financial advisor to Resaca with respect to the proposed merger. Under the terms of its engagement, Resaca paid Madison Williams a retainer fee of $75,000

I-93


Table of Contents


upon execution of an engagement letter dated May 15, 2009, and in addition agreed to pay Madison Williams a transaction fee of $700,000 for services rendered in connection with the merger, which will be paid only if the merger is successfully completed. In the event that the merger agreement is terminated, Madison Williams is entitled to receive 10% of any breakup fee paid to Resaca as a result of such termination, upon which there is no dollar cap on Madison Williams' share of any termination fees. Resaca has also agreed to reimburse Madison Williams for its reasonable expenses, including fees and disbursements of its counsel, and to indemnify Madison Williams against liabilities, including liabilities under the federal securities laws, relating to or arising out of its engagement as exclusive financial advisor to Resaca.

        Madison Williams, as part of its investment banking services, is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, strategic transactions, corporate restructurings, negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for corporate and other purposes.

        In the ordinary course of their businesses, Madison Williams and its affiliates may actively trade the debt and equity securities of Resaca and Cano for their own accounts and for the accounts of customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold long or short positions in such securities.


Opinion of Cano's Financial Advisor

        Cano retained RBC to act as its financial advisor with respect to a possible merger, sale or other business combination of Cano with Resaca. In connection with that engagement, the Cano board of directors requested that RBC evaluate the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the exchange ratio to be received for the shares of Cano common stock in the merger. On September 29, 2009, RBC rendered its oral opinion to the Cano board of directors, which opinion was subsequently confirmed in writing, that based on RBC's experience as investment bankers, as of that date and subject to the various assumptions and limitations set forth in its opinion, the exchange ratio in the merger of 2.100 shares of Resaca common stock for each share of Cano common stock (which does not give effect to the Reverse Stock Split) is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Cano common stock.

        The full text of RBC's written opinion, which sets forth material information relating to such opinion, including the assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the scope of review undertaken by RBC, is attached as Annex B to this proxy statement. This summary of RBC's opinion is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion. We urge you to read RBC's opinion carefully in its entirety.

        RBC's opinion was provided for the information and assistance of the Cano board of directors in connection with its consideration of the merger. RBC's opinion did not address the underlying business decision by Cano to engage in the merger or any other transaction related thereto or the relative merits of the merger compared to any alternative business strategy or transaction in which Cano might engage. RBC expressed no opinion and made no recommendation to any stockholder of Cano or any shareholder of Resaca or any other person as to how such stockholder or shareholder or other person should vote or act with respect to any matter related to the merger.

        RBC's opinion was intended for the use and benefit of the Cano board of directors. RBC's opinion may not be used for any other purpose without the prior written consent of RBC except as required by law. RBC's opinion, together with the analyses performed by RBC in connection with its opinion and reviewed with the Cano board of directors, were only one of the many factors taken into consideration by the Cano board of directors in making its determination to approve the merger and enter into the merger agreement. RBC has consented to the use of RBC's opinion in this proxy statement, however, RBC has not assumed any responsibility for the form or content of this proxy statement, other than RBC's opinion itself.

I-94


Table of Contents

        RBC's opinion addressed solely the fairness of the exchange ratio, from a financial point of view, to the holders of shares of Cano common stock and did not in any way address other terms or conditions of the merger or the merger agreement, including, without limitation, the financial or other terms of any other agreement contemplated by, or to be entered into in connection with, the merger agreement. RBC did not express any opinion as to the prices at which Cano common stock or Resaca common stock have traded or would trade at any time, including following the announcement or consummation of the merger, regardless of whether or not the merger is consummated. Further, in rendering its opinion, RBC expressed no opinion about the fairness of the amount or nature of the compensation (if any) to any of the officers, directors or employees of any party to the merger, or class of such persons, relative to the exchange ratio or otherwise. RBC did not express any opinion as to any tax or other consequences that might result from the merger, nor did RBC's opinion address any legal, tax, regulatory or accounting matters, as to which RBC understood that Cano had obtained such advice as it deemed necessary from qualified professionals.

        In arriving at its opinion, RBC was not authorized to solicit, and did not solicit, interest from any party with respect to a merger or other business combination transaction involving Cano or any of its assets.

        In rendering its opinion, RBC assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all the information that was reviewed by RBC, including all of the financial, legal, tax, operating and other information provided to or discussed with RBC by or on behalf of Cano or Resaca (including, without limitation, the financial statements and related notes thereto of each of Cano and Resaca), and RBC did not assume responsibility for independently verifying, and did not independently verify, such information. RBC assumed that all forecasts prepared by or on behalf of Cano or Resaca, as the case may be (including forecasts prepared Cano with respect to certain potential benefits of the merger expected to be realized from the merger and the timing of their occurrence), were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and good faith judgments of the future financial performance of Cano or Resaca (as the case may be), respectively, as standalone entities (or, in the case of the benefits of the merger, as a combined company). RBC expressed no opinion as to any such forecasts or the assumptions upon which they were based. Without limiting the foregoing, RBC also assumed that the Resaca preferred stock would remain outstanding from and after the effective time of the merger on the same terms and conditions as those of the Cano preferred stock as of the date of RBC's opinion.

        In rendering its opinion, RBC did not assume any responsibility to perform, and did not perform, an independent evaluation or appraisal of any of the assets or liabilities of Cano or Resaca, and RBC was not furnished with any such valuations or appraisals (except that a reserve report of Cano's reserves and a reserve report of Resaca's reserves, each as of June 30, 2009, were provided to Resaca and Cano, respectively, and RBC as part of the merger due diligence process). RBC did not assume any obligation to conduct, and did not conduct, any physical inspection of the property or facilities of Cano or Resaca. RBC did not investigate, and made no assumption regarding, any litigation or other claims affecting Cano or Resaca.

        In rendering its opinion, RBC was not aware of the proposed Reverse Stock Split and did not consider any effect of the Reverse Stock Split, including any adverse effect that may result on the liquidity of the Resaca common stock issued in the merger that may result as a result of the decrease in the number of shares of Resaca common stock outstanding as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. In addition, in rendering its opinion, RBC was not aware of the offering (including any potential dilution resulting from the antidilution protections to be provided to the recipients of the Resaca preferred stock in connection with the offering), the refinancing under the New Facility, the January 2010 sale of certain of Cano's Texas Panhandle assets or the terms of these transactions or the information contained in the December 31, 2009 Haas reports, each of which has arisen from events following the date of RBC's opinion, and RBC did not consider any effect of the offering (including the potential

I-95


Table of Contents


dilution from the antidilution protections), the refinancing under the New Facility, the Cano Texas Panhandle asset sale or the December 31, 2009 Haas reports for purposes of its opinion.

        In rendering its opinion, RBC also assumed that the merger would be consummated in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement, without waiver, modification or amendment of any material term, condition or agreement and that, in the course of obtaining the necessary regulatory or third party approvals, consents and releases for the merger, no delay, limitation, restriction or condition would be imposed that would have an adverse effect on Cano or Resaca or the contemplated benefits of the merger. RBC further assumed that all representations and warranties set forth in the merger agreement were and would be true and correct as of the date or the dates made or deemed made and that all parties to the merger agreement would comply with all covenants of such party thereunder. RBC further assumed that the executed version of the merger agreement would not differ, in any respect material to its opinion, from the latest draft of the merger agreement provided to RBC on September 29, 2009.

        RBC noted that the merger agreement also provides, among other things, that (i) each of the holders of any restricted shares of Cano common stock shall execute an orderly market deed (as such term is defined in the merger agreement), which orderly market deed shall, among other things, restrict the right of such holder to sell shares of Resaca common stock received in the merger; and (ii) certain directors of Cano shall be elected as members of the Resaca board of directors as of the closing of the merger. In rendering its opinion, RBC did not give any special consideration to any of the factors noted in the immediately preceding sentence. In addition, in rendering its opinion, RBC did not consider any effects of (A) any shares of Cano common stock held by Cano as treasury shares, or (B) any share of Cano common stock held by any holder of Cano common stock who does not vote in favor of the merger (or consent thereto in writing) and who is entitled to demand and properly demands a judicial appraisal of the fair value of such holder's shares pursuant to, and who complies in all respects with, the provisions of Section 262 of General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, or (C) any shares of Cano common stock held by Resaca or any of its affiliates, if any.

        RBC's opinion spoke only as of the date it was rendered, was based on the conditions as they existed and information which RBC had been supplied as of such date, and was without regard to any market, economic, financial, legal or other circumstances or events of any kind or nature which may exist or occur after such date. RBC has not undertaken to reaffirm or revise its opinion or otherwise comment on events occurring after the date of its opinion and does not have an obligation to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion. Unless otherwise noted, all analyses were performed based on market information available as of September 28, 2009, the last trading day preceding the date of RBC's opinion. For additional discussion of considerations regarding the timing of the shareholder meetings and consummation of the merger relative to the date of RBC's opinion, please see "Risk Factors—The fairness opinion obtained by Cano from its financial advisor will not reflect changes in circumstances between the date of the merger agreement and the dates of either the shareholder meetings or the consummation of the merger" beginning on page I-58.

        For the purposes of rendering its opinion, RBC undertook such review and inquiries it deemed necessary or appropriate under the circumstances, including the following:

I-96


Table of Contents

        In arriving at its opinion, in addition to the review, inquiries and analyses listed above, RBC performed the following analyses:

        In connection with the rendering of its opinion to the Cano board of directors, RBC reviewed with the Cano board of directors the analyses listed above and other information material to the opinion.

        Set forth below is a summary of the significant analyses performed by RBC and reviewed with the Cano board of directors on September 29, 2009 in connection with the delivery of RBC's opinion. The financial analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. To fully understand the summary of the analyses used by RBC, the tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the analysis. Considering the data in the tables below without considering the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of RBC's financial analyses. None of the analyses presented in this section were prepared taking into account the Reverse Stock Split, and none of the analyses have been adjusted to reflect or give effect to the Reverse Stock Split.

        In addition, for all purposes of its analyses summarized in this section, RBC defined enterprise value, which we refer to in this section as EV, for Resaca and Cano as fully diluted equity value (including the impact of any vested or outstanding options and restricted stock, as applicable) as of September 28, 2009, plus total debt, preferred stock (at liquidation value) and minority interest less cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities (other than restricted cash, where identified as such). RBC used the balance sheet for Resaca and Cano as of June 30, 2009, the latest balance sheet provided to RBC, to determine the value of these items, other than market prices.

I-97


Table of Contents

        For purposes of the analyses summarized below, RBC calculated the "implied value" of the exchange ratio to be equal to the value of 2.100 shares of Resaca common stock as of the close of trading on September 28, 2009, the last trading day preceding the date of RBC's opinion. Based upon the closing price per share of Resaca common stock of £0.50, or $0.79 based on the USD-GBP exchange rate of 1.5882 per Bloomberg on September 28, 2009, which we refer to in this section as the September 28 Resaca closing price, and the exchange ratio in the merger of 2.100 shares of Resaca common stock per share of Cano common stock, RBC calculated an implied value of the exchange ratio of $1.67 per share of Cano common stock, which we refer to in this section as the implied merger consideration value, to be used for purposes of certain of the analyses performed.


Resaca Standalone Valuation Analysis

        RBC performed analyses of the value of Resaca to determine the reasonableness of the September 28 Resaca closing price of $0.79 to determine whether it could be used for purposes of analyzing the value of the exchange ratio in the merger.

        Comparable Company Analysis.    RBC prepared a comparable company analysis of certain implied multiples of Resaca in relation to the corresponding implied multiples of a group of publicly-traded companies that RBC deemed for purposes of its analysis to be comparable to Resaca.

        RBC reviewed the relevant metrics of the following publicly-traded exploration and production companies (with their metrics adjusted, as applicable, in one case, to reflect a recently completed asset sale in July 2009):

        Although none of the selected companies is directly comparable to Resaca, the companies included were chosen because they are publicly traded companies with operations that for purposes of analysis may be considered similar to certain operations of Resaca.

        In this analysis, RBC compared the enterprise value of Resaca expressed as a multiple of Resaca's calendar year 2010 projected production and risked reserves as of June 30, 2009. Projected production was based on Resaca management projections in the case of Resaca and, in the case of the comparable companies, on RBC Equity Research estimates, where available, or in one case where RBC Equity Research was not available, comparable Wall Street research. Unrisked reserves were obtained from the reserve report of Resaca's reserves as of June 30, 2009 in the case of Resaca and, in the case of the comparable companies, on the reserves most-recently disclosed in SEC filings. Given that Resaca and selected comparable companies were in a developmental stage and have a significant amount of undeveloped and non-producing reserves, RBC, based on its understanding of the market valuation for such companies, risk-adjusted the reserves of these companies to more appropriately reflect the market valuation of these companies. RBC risk-adjusted reserves as follows:

I-98


Table of Contents

        The following table presents, as of September 28, 2009, Resaca's implied EV-to-Production and EV-to-Risked Reserves, and the corresponding multiples for the comparable companies:

 
  Comparable Companies   Resaca
September 28
Resaca
Closing Price
 
 
  Min.   Mean   Median   Max.  

EV as a multiple of:

                               
 

2010E Production (Boe/d)

  $ 43,733   $ 63,174   $ 58,251   $ 92,461   $ 97,917  
 

Risked Reserves (Boe)

  $ 12.67   $ 20.09   $ 22.92   $ 24.67   $ 10.64  

        For purposes of its analysis, RBC defined enterprise value for comparable companies as fully diluted market capitalization as of September 28, 2009 plus net debt (defined by RBC as total debt less cash (other than restricted cash, where identified as such) and cash equivalents, and preferred stock and minority interests, where applicable), using latest publicly-available balance sheet data.

        Based on the foregoing, RBC determined estimated EV-to-calendar year 2010 estimated Production multiples of $45,000 to $90,000 and EV-to-Risked Reserves as of June 30, 2009 of $9.50 to $15.00. RBC applied such ranges to Resaca's calendar year 2010 estimated Production of 1,108 Boe/d and Risked Reserves as of June 30, 2009 of 8,030 MBoe, respectively. RBC derived an implied value per share range for Resaca of $0.19 to $0.70 based on EV-to-calendar year 2010 estimated Production, and $0.46 to $0.92 based on EV-to-Risked Reserves as of June 30, 2009. RBC noted that the September 28 Resaca closing price was $0.79 per share of Resaca common stock.

        Net Asset Value Analysis of Resaca.    RBC also performed a net asset value analysis of Resaca. RBC calculated the present value of the field-level before-tax future cash flows that Resaca could be expected to generate from its existing base of proved reserves, based on a third-party engineering report as of June 30, 2009 and assuming the spot natural gas and crude oil prices of $3.80 per Mcf and $69.31per barrel, respectively, risk-adjusted as follows:

        RBC discounted these field-level before-tax cash flows at 10% in order to estimate Resaca's gross asset value. RBC then calculated the net asset value for Resaca by adjusting gross asset value for working capital, debt and cash. Net asset value per share for Resaca, using a fully diluted number of shares for Resaca, adjusted for any in-the-money vested options outstanding, was determined to be $0.80. RBC then applied a factor of +/- 10% to obtain a reasonable range of net asset values per share for Resaca, yielding a range of $0.72 and $0.88 for Resaca. RBC noted that the September 28 Resaca closing price was $0.79 per share of Resaca common stock.

        Based on the aforementioned analyses, RBC determined that the September 28 Resaca closing price of $0.79 reflected a reasonably adequate valuation of Resaca to be used for purposes of analyzing the value of the exchange ratio in the merger.

Cano Standalone Valuation Analysis

        Comparable Company Analysis.    RBC prepared a comparable company analysis of certain implied multiples of Cano in relation to the corresponding implied multiples of a group of publicly-traded companies that RBC deemed for purposes of its analysis to be comparable to Cano.

I-99


Table of Contents

        RBC reviewed the relevant metrics of the following publicly-traded E&P companies (with their metrics adjusted, as applicable, in one case, to reflect a recently completed asset sale in July 2009):

        Although none of the selected companies is directly comparable to Cano, the companies included were chosen because they are publicly traded companies with operations that for purposes of analysis may be considered similar to certain operations of Cano.

        In this analysis, RBC compared the enterprise value of Cano implied by the closing price per share of Cano common stock of $1.02 on September 28, 2009, which we refer to in this section as the September 28 Cano closing price, expressed as a multiple of Cano's calendar year 2010 projected Production and risked reserves as of June 30, 2009. Projected production was based on Cano management projections in the case of Cano and, in the case of the comparable companies, on RBC Equity Research estimates, where available, or in one case where RBC Equity Research was not available, comparable Wall Street research. Unrisked Reserves were based on a third-party engineering report of Cano's reserves as of June 30, 2009 in the case of Cano and, in the case of the comparable companies, on the reserves most-recently disclosed in SEC filings. Given that Cano and selected comparable companies were in a developmental stage and have a significant amount of undeveloped and non-producing reserves, RBC, based on its understanding of the market valuation for such companies, risk-adjusted the reserves of these companies to more appropriately reflect the market valuation of these companies. For purposes of its analyses, RBC risk-adjusted the reserves as follows:

        The following table presents, as of September 28, 2009, Cano's implied EV-to-Production and EV-to-Risked Reserves, as determined on the basis of the September 28 Cano closing price, and the corresponding multiples for the comparable companies, as determined on the basis of their respective stock prices, for the periods reviewed by RBC in connection with its analysis:

 
  Comparable Companies   Cano
September 28
Cano Closing
Price
 
 
  Min.   Mean   Median   Max.  

EV as a multiple of:

                               
 

2010E Production (Boe/d)

  $ 43,733   $ 63,174   $ 58,251   $ 92,461   $ 94,032  
 

Risked Reserves (Boe)

  $ 12.67   $ 20.09   $ 22.92   $ 24.67   $ 4.51  

        For purposes of its analysis, RBC defined EV for comparable companies as fully diluted market capitalization as of September 28, 2009 plus net debt (defined by RBC as total debt less cash (other than restricted cash, where identified as such) and cash equivalents, and preferred stock and minority interests, where applicable), using latest publicly-available balance sheet data.

        Based on the foregoing, RBC calculated estimated EV-to-calendar year 2010 estimated Production multiples of $45,000 to $90,000 and EV-to-Risked Reserves as of June 30, 2009 of $6.00 to $10.00. RBC applied such ranges to Cano's calendar year 2010 estimated Production of 1,371 Boe/d and Risked Reserves as of June 30, 2009 of 19,249 MBoe, respectively. RBC derived an implied value per

I-100


Table of Contents


share range for Cano of $0.00 to $0.90 based on EV-to-calendar year 2010 estimated Production and $0.73 to $2.41 based on EV-to-Risked Reserves as of June 30, 2009. RBC noted that the implied merger consideration value in the merger was $1.67 per share of Cano common stock.

        Precedent Transaction Analysis.    RBC reviewed the financial terms of certain recent merger and acquisition transactions as reported in SEC filings, public company disclosures, other publicly-available sources and its internal RBC Richardson Barr database. RBC selected transactions announced year-to-date in 2009 where the target companies were involved in oil and gas exploration and production in either the Permian Basin or the Mid-Continent or Rockies regions. These transactions include:

Announcement Date
  Buyer   Seller

9/21/09

 

Merit Management Partners I, L.P.

 

Petrohawk Energy Corp.

9/15/09

 

Apollo Global Management, LLC

 

Parallel Petroleum Corp.

8/31/09

 

Pioneer Southwest Energy Partners LP

 

Pioneer Natural Resources Company. (certain assets)

8/5/09

 

Linn Energy, LLC

 

Forest Oil Corporation (Certain assets)

8/2/09

 

Hicks Acquisition Company I

 

Resolute Natural Resources Company, LLC

7/17/09

 

Undisclosed acquiror

 

Breitburn Energy Partners, L.P. (certain assets)

Q2 2009

 

Undisclosed acquiror

 

LCS Production Company (certain assets)

6/30/09

 

Undisclosed acquiror

 

Pioneer Natural Resources Co. (certain assets)

6/29/09

 

Encore Acquisition Company

 

EXCO Resources, Inc. (certain assets)

6/29/09

 

Encore Energy Partners LP

 

Encore Acquisition Company (certain assets)

6/16/09

 

Seneca Resources Corporation

 

Ivanhoe Energy (USA) Inc. (certain assets)

5/20/09

 

Slawson Exploration Company, Inc.

 

Windsor Bakken LLC / Gulfport Energy Corporation

5/18/09

 

Encore Energy Partners LP

 

Encore Acquisition Company (certain assets)

5/5/09

 

Energen Resources Corporation

 

Range Resources Corp. (certain assets)

4/30/09

 

Apache Corp.

 

Marathon Oil Corp. (certain assets)

4/30/09

 

Undisclosed acquiror

 

Marathon Oil Corp. (certain assets)

1/9/09

 

Black Stone Minerals Company, L.P.

 

Certain assets

        Although none of the selected precedent transactions involved businesses that are directly comparable to Cano's business, RBC determined that the operations of the target businesses involved in the selected transactions as a whole for purposes of analysis may be considered comparable to Cano's operations.

        RBC reviewed the EV-to-last twelve month, which we refer to as LTM, production and EV-to-Risked Reserves of the selected precedent transactions. The results of these analyses were as follows:

 
  Comparable Companies  
 
  Min.   Mean   Median   Max.  

EV as a multiple of:

                         
 

LTM Production (Boe/d)

  $ 12,498   $ 65,826   $ 67,224   $ 131,694  
 

Risked Reserves (Boe)

  $ 8.58   $ 14.52   $ 12.48   $ 32.52  

        Based on the foregoing, RBC determined estimated EV-to-last twelve month production multiples of $60,000 to $90,000 and EV-to-Risked Reserves multiples of $7.00 to $11.00. RBC applied such ranges to Cano's last twelve months production as of June 30, 2009 of 1,201 Boe/d and Risked Reserves as of June 30, 2009 of 19,249 MBoe, respectively. RBC derived an implied value per share range of Cano of $0.00 to $0.57 based on EV-to-last twelve month production and $1.15 to $2.83 based

I-101


Table of Contents


on EV-to-Risked Reserves. RBC noted that the implied merger consideration value in the merger was $1.67 per share of Cano common stock.

        Net Asset Value Analysis of Cano.    RBC also performed a net asset value analysis of Cano. RBC calculated the present value of the field-level before-tax future cash flows that Cano could be expected to generate from its existing base of proved reserves, based on a third-party engineering report as of June 30, 2009 and assuming the NYMEX natural gas, crude oil and NGLs, prices of $3.71 per Mcf, $69.89 per barrel of oil and $40.71 per barrel of NGLs, respectively, risk-adjusted as follows:

        RBC discounted these field-level before-tax cash flows at 10% in order to estimate Cano's gross asset value. RBC then calculated the net asset value for Cano by adjusting gross asset value for working capital, debt and cash. Net asset value per share for Cano, using a fully diluted number of shares adjusted for all options outstanding and restricted stock, was determined to be $1.98. RBC then applied a factor of +/- 10% to obtain a reasonable range of net asset values per share for Cano, yielding a range of $1.81 and $2.21 for Cano. RBC noted that the implied merger consideration value in the merger was $1.67 per share of Cano common stock.

Exchange Ratio Analysis

        RBC calculated the implied exchange ratios using the Cano stand-alone per share equity valuation reference ranges obtained from the methodologies mentioned above, and the September 28 Resaca closing price. The results for each methodology were as follows:

Comparable Companies Analysis—EV as a multiple of:

   
 

2010E Production (Boe/d)

  Up to 1.133x
 

Risked Reserves (Boe)

  0.915x to 3.029x

Precedent Transaction Analysis—EV as a multiple of:

   
 

LTM Production (Boe/d)

  Up to 0.713x
 

Risked Reserves (Boe)

  1.443x to 3.558x

NAV Analysis

  2.281x to 2.787x

        RBC noted that the exchange ratio in the merger was 2.100x (prior to the Reverse Stock Split).

Historical Exchange Ratio Analysis

        RBC reviewed the historical trading prices for shares of Cano common stock and Resaca common stock for the period from July 16, 2008 (the date of Resaca's initial public offering on the AIM) to September 28, 2009. RBC also analyzed the historical trading ratio of the respective common stock of Cano and Resaca for various periods during the period from July 16, 2008 to September 28, 2009 as set forth in the table below, and compared it to the exchange ratio of 2.100x to be paid in the merger and the premium (or discount) implied by that exchange ratio in the merger at each historical trading ratio.

I-102


Table of Contents


For purposes of its analysis, RBC converted Resaca's daily closing prices to United States dollars using the daily USD-GBP exchange rate per Bloomberg.

 
  Cano
Price
  Resaca
Price
  Implied
Exchange Ratio
  Implied Transaction
Premium/Discount
 

Current (as of September 28, 2009)

  $ 1.02   $ 0.79     1.284 x   63.5 %

1 Week Volume-Weighted Average Price ("VWAP")

    1.02     0.80     1.275     64.7 %

2 Weeks VWAP

    1.10     0.75     1.456     44.3 %

3 Weeks VWAP

    1.05     0.67     1.566     34.1 %

1 Month VWAP

    1.03     0.63     1.633     28.6 %

3 Months VWAP

    0.87     0.52     1.675     25.4 %

6 Months VWAP

    0.87     0.46     1.906     10.2 %

1 Year VWAP

    0.77     0.46     1.699     23.6 %

VWAP Since IPO

    1.36     0.48     2.828     (25.7 )%

52-week high price (9/28/08 to 9/28/09)

    2.58     2.32     1.110     89.2 %

52-week low price (9/28/08 to 9/28/09)

    0.22     0.19     1.135     85.1 %

Relative Contribution Analysis

        RBC reviewed and analyzed the estimated future operating and financial contributions of each of Cano and Resaca to the pro forma merged entity, both on an unlevered (enterprise value) basis for fiscal year 2010 and fiscal year 2011 EBITDA, fiscal year 2009, fiscal year 2010 and fiscal year 2011 Production, and current risked and unrisked Reserves, and on a levered (equity ownership) basis for current Net Asset Value and fiscal year 2010 and fiscal year 2011 Cash Flow. These values were compared to Cano contribution to the combined entity of 59.4%, on an unlevered basis, and 49.7%, on a levered basis (pro forma common stock ownership of Cano stockholders). The following table presents the results of this analysis:

 
  Production   EBITDA  

FY 2009

    64 %    

FY 2010

    61 %   38 %

FY 2011

    49 %   24 %

 


 

Reserves

 

 


 

Current risked

    78 %      

Current unrisked

    71 %      

 
  Cash Flow    
 

FY 2010

    NM        

FY 2011

    44 %      

 


 

Net Asset Value

 

 


 

Current risked

    72 %      

Current unrisked

    54 %      

Pro Forma Transaction Impact

        RBC reviewed and analyzed the impact of the merger on a per share basis to Cano's shareholders in relation to certain financial and operating metrics of the combined company, on both a levered and

I-103


Table of Contents


unlevered basis. The per share impact was based on Cano contribution to the combined entity of 59.4%, on an unlevered basis, and 49.7%, on a levered basis (pro forma common stock ownership of Cano shareholders). The following table presents the results of this analysis:

 
  Production   EBITDA   G&A Expense  

FY 2010

    (3 )%   55 %   (4 )%

FY 2011

    22 %   152 %   2 %

 

 
  Reserves   PV-10  

Current risked

    (24 )%   (18 )%

Current unrisked

    (16 )%   (3 )%

Debt / FY 2010 EBITDA

   
(10.1x

)
     

 
  Cash Flow  

FY 2010

    (118 )%

FY 2011

    14 %

Overview of Analyses; Other Considerations

        In reaching its opinion, RBC did not assign any particular weight to any one analysis or the results yielded by that analysis. Rather, having reviewed these results in the aggregate, RBC exercised its professional judgment in determining that, as of September 29, 2009 and based on the aggregate of the analyses used and the results they yielded, the exchange ratio was fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Cano common stock. RBC believed that it was inappropriate to, and therefore did not, rely solely on the quantitative results of the analyses and, accordingly, also made qualitative judgments concerning differences between the characteristics of Cano and the merger and the data selected for use in its analyses, as further discussed below.

        No single company or transaction used in the above analyses as a comparison is identical to Cano, Resaca or the merger, and an evaluation of the results of those analyses is not entirely mathematical. Rather, the analyses involve complex considerations and judgments concerning financial and operating characteristics and other factors that could affect the acquisition, public trading or other values of the companies, businesses or transactions analyzed. The analyses were prepared solely for purposes of RBC providing an opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the exchange ratio to the holders of Cano common stock and do not purport to be appraisals or necessarily reflect the prices at which businesses or securities actually may be sold, which are inherently subject to uncertainty.

        The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process that involves the application of subjective business judgment in determining the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances. Several analytical methodologies have been employed and no one method of analysis should be regarded as critical to the overall conclusion RBC reached. Each analytical technique has inherent strengths and weaknesses, and the nature of the available information may further affect the value of particular techniques. The overall conclusions RBC reached are based on all the analyses and factors presented, taken as a whole, and also on application of RBC's own experience and judgment. Such conclusions may involve significant elements of subjective judgment and qualitative analysis. RBC therefore gave no opinion as to the value or merit standing alone of any one or more parts of the analyses. RBC therefore believes

I-104


Table of Contents


that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of the analyses and of the factors considered, without considering all factors and analyses, could create an incomplete or misleading view of the processes underlying its opinion. RBC's opinion was approved by RBC's Fairness Opinion Committee.

        In connection with its analyses, RBC made, and was provided by Cano's management and/or Resaca's management with, numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, general business and economic conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond Cano's and/or Resaca's control. Analyses based upon forecasts of future results are not necessarily indicative of actual future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by these analyses. Because these analyses are inherently subject to uncertainty, being based upon numerous factors or events beyond the control of Cano or Resaca or its respective advisors, none of Cano, Resaca, RBC or any other person assumes responsibility if future results or actual values are materially different from these forecasts or assumptions.

        Under its engagement agreement with Cano, RBC became entitled to receive a fee of $300,000 upon the delivery of RBC's opinion, which fee is not contingent upon the successful completion of the merger. In addition, for RBC's services as financial advisor to Cano in connection with the merger, if the merger is successfully completed, RBC will receive an additional fee equal to $1,500,000, against which the fee RBC received for delivery of its opinion will be credited. In addition, Cano has agreed to pay RBC an exchange fee equal to a specified percentage of the gross face amount of any securities extinguished in an exchange of certain securities of Cano for new securities, including in connection with the merger, half of which exchange fee shall be credited against the fee payable if the merger is successfully completed. Cano and RBC estimate that the exchange of the Cano preferred stock for the Resaca preferred stock in the merger will result in an additional exchange fee payment equal to approximately $400,000 after giving effect to the credits of the exchange fee. In addition, if, in connection with the merger not being completed, Cano receives a termination fee, RBC will be entitled to a specified percentage of that fee in cash, when it is received by Cano.

        Under its engagement agreement with Cano, Cano has also agreed to indemnify RBC and its related parties for claims, damages, losses, liabilities or expenses that relate to or may arise out of the merger or RBC's engagement under the engagement agreement unless they have been found to have resulted primarily and directly from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the indemnified party. In addition, Cano also agreed to reimburse RBC and its related parties for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with RBC's services or the investigation of, or preparation for or defense of any pending or threatened claim that relates to or may arise out of the merger or RBC's engagement under the engagement agreement. In addition, in the engagement agreement with Cano, Cano agreed that neither RBC nor any of its related parties will have any liability to Cano or its affiliates, partners, directors, officers, consultants, agents, employees, controlling persons, creditors or security holders for any losses, claims, damages, liabilities or reasonable expenses related to or arising out of the merger or RBC's engagement under the engagement agreement unless they have been found to have resulted primarily and directly from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of RBC or the related party. In addition, in the engagement agreement with Cano, Cano acknowledged and agreed that all advice and opinions rendered by RBC are intended solely for the use and benefit of the Cano board of directors and may not be used or relied upon by any other person, nor may such advice or opinions be reproduced, summarized, excerpted from or referred to in any public document or given to any other person without the prior written consent of RBC. RBC has provided its consent to the disclosure and summary of its opinion in this proxy statement. With respect to the terms of the engagement agreement with RBC that relate to the exculpation of liability and the inability of any person other than the Cano board of directors to rely on the opinions or advice of RBC, both Cano and RBC believe that such provisions are customary for financial advisory engagement agreements of this kind. However, neither Cano nor RBC has evaluated or reached any conclusions about whether

I-105


Table of Contents


these provisions of the engagement agreement would be enforceable against Cano shareholders, who are not parties to the engagement agreement, in this matter. The availability of any basis upon which the enforceability of such provisions could be challenged, and any defenses that RBC or Cano would have to such challenges, would, if challenged, be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction.

        The terms of the engagement letter were negotiated at arm's-length between Cano and RBC and the Cano board of directors was aware of this fee arrangement and the other terms of the engagement at the time of its approval of the merger agreement.

        RBC, as part of its investment banking services, is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, corporate restructurings, underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements, and valuations for corporate and other purposes. In the ordinary course of business, RBC or one or more of its affiliates may act as a market maker and broker in the publicly traded securities of Cano and/or Resaca and receive customary compensation, and may also actively trade securities of Cano and/or Resaca for its own account and the accounts of its customers, and, accordingly, RBC and its affiliates may hold a long or short position in such securities. In addition, RBC and/or one or more of its affiliates have in the past provided investment banking services to each of Cano and Resaca, for which RBC received customary fees. In particular, in December 2008, RBC was retained by Cano as a financial advisor to advise the Cano board of directors on various strategic matters not specifically related to Resaca. In July 2008, RBC or one or more of its affiliates represented Resaca as the joint broker and in other related capacities for the initial public offering and admittance for trading to the AIM of shares of Resaca common stock, and RBC or one or more of its affiliates has continued to serve as a joint broker for Resaca since the initial public offering. In October 2008, RBC or one or more of its affiliates represented Resaca as a financial advisor in connection with Resaca's consideration of a possible acquisition transaction and a related equity offering in connection with the acquisition transaction. Neither the acquisition transaction nor the offering was consummated. In light of RBC's prior services to Cano and Resaca, RBC anticipated that it may be selected by Cano and/or Resaca to provide investment banking and financial advisory and/or financing services that may be required by Cano and/or Resaca in the future, regardless of whether the merger is successfully completed, for which RBC would expect to receive customary fees. Since the date of the delivery of RBC's opinion, RBC and Resaca have agreed that RBC will serve as the underwriter in the equity offering of Resaca referred to elsewhere in this proxy statement, for which RBC will receive customary fees. RBC has not received any fees from Cano or Resaca in the prior two years except as described above, will not receive any fees from Resaca relating to the merger and does not have any agreement or understanding with Cano or Resaca regarding any other services to be performed now or in the future, other than pursuant to its engagements described above. The Cano board of directors, in selecting RBC as its financial advisor and in receiving and taking into consideration RBC's opinion, was aware of these facts but determined that RBC's prior services did not preclude, but rather they supported, the re-engagement of RBC as its financial advisor.

        RBC is an internationally recognized investment banking firm providing a full range of financial advisory and securities services. Cano selected RBC as its financial advisor based on RBC's experience in mergers and acquisitions and in securities valuation generally.

        RBC's opinion was one of many factors taken into consideration by the Cano board of directors in determining to enter into the merger agreement. See "—Cano's Reasons for the Merger" beginning on page I-90. Consequently, the analyses described above should not be viewed as determinative of the opinion of the Cano board of directors or any director with respect to the exchange ratio or of whether the Cano board of directors would have been willing to determine that a different exchange ratio was fair. The exchange ratio to be paid pursuant to the merger was determined through arm's-length negotiations between Cano and Resaca and was recommended by the Cano board of directors. RBC did not recommend any specific exchange ratio to the Cano board of directors or Cano or that any given exchange ratio constituted the only appropriate consideration for the merger.

I-106


Table of Contents


Accounting Treatment

        The merger will be accounted for as an acquisition of Cano by Resaca under the purchase method of accounting under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Under the purchase method of accounting, the assets and liabilities of the acquired company are, as of completion of the merger, recorded at their respective fair values and added to those of the accounting acquirer. Financial statements of Resaca issued after the merger will reflect only the operations of Cano after the merger and will not be restated retroactively to reflect the historical financial position or results of operations of Cano.

        All unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements contained in this proxy statement were prepared using the purchase method of accounting. The final allocation of the purchase price will be determined after the merger is completed and after completion of an analysis to determine the fair value of Cano's assets and liabilities. Accordingly, the final purchase accounting adjustments may be materially different from the unaudited pro forma adjustments. Any decrease in the fair value of the assets or increase in the fair value of the liabilities of Cano as compared to the unaudited pro forma information included in this proxy statement will have the effect of increasing the amount of the purchase price allocable to oil and gas properties.


Opinion as to Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger

        As a condition to the merger, Cano must receive an opinion of its tax counsel, Thompson & Knight, that the merger will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and that Cano and Resaca shall each be a party to the reorganization within the meaning of Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code.

        Such opinion is or will be based on certain factual representations, warranties and covenants contained in the certificates signed by duly authorized officers of Cano, Resaca and Merger Sub. An opinion of counsel represents counsel's best legal judgment and is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service, and there can be no assurance that following the merger the Internal Revenue Service will not challenge the legal conclusion expressed in the opinion. Please review carefully the information under the caption "Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger" beginning on page I-116 for a description of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger.


Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger

        In considering the recommendation of the boards with respect to the merger, you should be aware that certain officers and directors of Resaca and Cano have the following interests in the merger that are separate from and in addition to the interests of shareholders of Resaca and stockholders of Cano generally. The Resaca and Cano boards were aware of these interests and considered them in approving the merger agreement.

        Composition of Resaca's Board.    The merger agreement provides that after the merger the Resaca board will consist of seven members—four individuals designated by Resaca and three individuals designated by Cano. Members of Resaca's board of directors who are not also employees of Resaca will each receive the director's fees and other compensation described under "Compensation Discussion & Analysis of Resaca" on page IV-1.

        Outstanding Stock Options and Restricted Stock.    As of May 28, 2010, directors, executive officers and employees of Cano held options for 1,320,910 shares of Cano common stock and restricted stock awards related to 273,335 shares of Cano common stock. As of May 28, 2010, options to purchase 195,315 shares of Cano common stock were subject to vesting, with 64,283 options vesting in 2010, 127,532 options vesting in 2011 and 3,500 options vesting in 2012. These options will vest in full

I-107


Table of Contents


immediately prior to the completion of the merger and will be converted into options to purchase shares of Resaca common stock, subject to adjustment for the 0.42 exchange ratio (prior to effectuating the Reverse Stock Split) and in accordance with the requirements of Section 424(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. In addition, on May 28, 2010, 273,335 shares of Cano restricted stock were subject to vesting, with 126,667 shares vesting in 2010 and 146,668 shares vesting in 2011. The restrictions on any restricted stock awards held by Cano's directors, employees and officers will expire immediately before the merger is completed.

        The implied merger consideration price per Cano share is $1.67. Should $1.67 become the actual deal price (as stock-for-stock mergers result in fluctuating stock prices until completion), the quantification of the benefit to be received by the Cano directors, employees and executive officers in connection with accelerated vesting of outstanding Cano stock options and restricted stock would be $0 for stock options and $456,469 for restricted stock.

        None of Cano's directors or executive officers have stock options with exercise prices of less than the $1.67 implied merger consideration price per Cano share that would vest immediately. Therefore, there is no benefit to the accelerated vesting of Cano stock options to Cano's directors and executive officers.

        Cano's directors do not have restricted shares. Cano's executive officers and employees have an aggregate of 273,335 non-vested restricted stock shares at May 28, 2010. Based on the $1.67 implied merger consideration price per share, the benefit to the accelerated vesting of Cano restricted shares to Cano's executive officers and employees is $456,469 (273,335 shares times $1.67 per share). Due to fluctuations in the market price of Resaca common stock, the benefit to be received by the Cano directors, employees and executive officers could be more or less than the amounts stated upon consummation of the merger.

        Employment Agreements.    The following officers of Cano each have employment agreements with Cano which give them additional rights if there is a change of control of Cano: (i) Michael J. Ricketts, Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer; and (ii) Phillip B. Feiner, Corporate Secretary, Vice President and General Counsel. The merger will constitute a change of control under those agreements. Therefore, if any of those individuals is terminated for any reason within twelve months of the merger, or resigns within twelve months of the merger because his job title, duties or compensation has been reduced or he has been required to relocate to a county that does not abut Tarrant County, each will be entitled to a lump-sum cash severance payment equal to three times his annual salary then in effect and three times the sum of his prior year's bonuses, subject to certain limitations, and to company medical benefits for himself, his spouse and his dependants for up to three years. Upon such an event, the benefits payable to Messrs. Ricketts and Feiner under the terms of their respective employment agreements are $636,000 and $541,355, respectively. Also, Mr. Ricketts and his spouse and dependents would be entitled to medical benefits as described above during the succeeding three years estimated at $12,600 annually. Resaca currently intends to retain each of these individuals in positions and at compensation levels comparable to their current positions and compensation levels with Cano.

        Mr. McKinney resigned from his position as Senior Vice President of Engineering and Operations of Cano, effective as of May 11, 2010. Mr. McKinney will not be an officer of Resaca upon the completion of the merger. As such, Mr. McKinney's employment agreement with Cano and any change of control provisions thereunder will have no effect.

        S. Jeffrey Johnson and Benjamin L. Daitch, Cano's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, each have employment agreements with Cano containing provisions similar to those described above, and neither will continue as a Cano or Resaca employee after the merger. In connection with the signing of the merger agreement, Resaca required, and both Mr. Johnson and Mr. Daitch agreed, to enter into separation agreements permitting one-third of their respective severance payments to be made by delivery of shares of Resaca common stock rather than cash and

I-108


Table of Contents


reducing the term of the company medical benefits from three years to one year. The amounts due under such separation agreements, which will be paid six months after the completion of the merger, are as follows:

 
  Cash   Stock*  

S. Jeffrey Johnson

  $ 1,366,308   $ 683,304  

Benjamin L. Daitch

  $ 578,666   $ 289,332  

*
Shares of Resaca common stock equal to these dollar amounts as of the effective time of the merger will be issued to Messrs. Johnson and Daitch six months following such effective time.

        Voting Agreement.    On October 20, 2009, Cano entered into a stock voting agreement with S. Jeffrey Johnson, Cano's Chief Executive Officer and a member of Cano's board of directors, which provides, among other things, that Mr. Johnson will vote all of his shares of Cano common stock and Cano preferred stock in favor of the Cano Series D Amendment.

        Directors' and Officers' Indemnification and Insurance.    The merger agreement provides that for six years after the effective time of the merger, the surviving corporation will indemnify the present and former officers and directors of Cano and its subsidiaries from liabilities arising out of actions or omissions in their capacity as such at or prior to the effective time of the merger, to the full extent permitted under Delaware law or the surviving corporation's certificate of formation and bylaws. Accordingly, the surviving corporation will maintain Cano's directors' and officers' insurance coverage for six years after the effective time of the merger but only to the extent related to actions or omissions prior to the effective time of the merger, provided that the surviving corporation may substitute insurance policies with substantially similar coverage and amounts containing no less advantageous terms than those maintained by Cano as of the effective time of the merger. The aggregate amount of premiums to be paid with respect to the maintenance of such policies for the six-year period shall not exceed $2 million. Resaca has received premium quotations from insurance providers for such policies for substantially less than $2 million.


Appraisal Rights

        Holders of shares of Cano preferred stock who do not vote in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement and who properly demand appraisal of their shares will be entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the merger under Section 262 of the DGCL.

        The following summary of the provisions of Section 262 is not a complete statement of the law pertaining to appraisal rights under the DGCL, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of Section 262, a copy of which is attached as Annex E to this proxy statement. If you wish to exercise appraisal rights or wish to preserve your right to do so, you should carefully review Section 262 and are urged to consult a legal advisor.

        Under Delaware law, holders of shares of Cano preferred stock who do not wish to accept the merger consideration, who do not vote in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement and who otherwise properly demand appraisal of their shares may elect to have the "fair value" of their shares of Cano preferred stock determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery and paid in cash, together with a interest, if any. The "fair value" will exclude any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger. A stockholder may only exercise these appraisal rights by complying with the provisions of Section 262 of the DGCL, which we refer to as Section 262.

        All references in Section 262 and in this summary to a "stockholder" are to the record holder of shares of Cano preferred stock as to which appraisal rights are asserted. A person having a beneficial interest in shares of Cano preferred stock held of record in the name of another person, such as a

I-109


Table of Contents


broker, bank or other nominee, must act promptly to cause the record holder to follow properly the steps summarized below and in a timely manner to perfect appraisal rights.

        Under Section 262, where a proposed merger is to be submitted for adoption at a meeting of stockholders, as in the case of Cano's special meeting, Cano, not less than 20 days prior to the meeting, must notify each of its stockholders entitled to appraisal rights that these appraisal rights are available and include in the notice a copy of Section 262. This proxy statement constitutes notice to the Cano stockholders, and the full text of Section 262 is attached as Annex E to this proxy statement.

        If you wish to exercise the right to demand appraisal under Section 262, you must satisfy each of the following conditions:

        Only a holder of record of shares of Cano preferred stock is entitled to demand an exercise of appraisal rights for those shares registered in that holder's name. A demand for appraisal should be executed by or on behalf of the stockholder of record, fully and correctly, as the holder's name appears on the holder's stock certificates, should specify the holder's name and mailing address and the number of shares registered in the holder's name and must state that the person intends thereby to demand appraisal of the holder's shares in connection with the merger.

        If the shares of Cano preferred stock are owned of record by a person in a fiduciary capacity, such as a trustee, guardian or custodian, the demand must be executed in that capacity. If the shares are owned of record by more than one person as in a joint tenancy or tenancy in common, the demand must be executed by or on behalf of all of the owners. An authorized agent, including an agent for two or more joint owners, may execute a demand for appraisal on behalf of a stockholder; however, the agent must identify the record owner or owners and expressly disclose the fact that in executing the demand the agent is acting as agent for such owner or owners. A record holder, such as a broker, who holds shares as nominee for several beneficial owners may exercise appraisal rights with respect to the shares held for one or more beneficial owners while not exercising these rights with respect to the shares held for one or more other beneficial owners. In that case, the written demand should set forth the number of shares as to which appraisal is sought, and where no number of shares is expressly mentioned, the demand will be presumed to cover all shares held in the name of the record owner.

        Stockholders who hold their shares of Cano preferred stock in "street name" in brokerage accounts or other nominee forms and who wish to exercise appraisal rights are urged to consult with their brokers to determine appropriate procedures for making a demand for appraisal.

I-110


Table of Contents

        A stockholder who elects to exercise appraisal rights under Section 262 should mail or deliver a written demand to:

Cano Petroleum, Inc.
Corporate Secretary
801 Cherry Street, Suite 3200
Fort Worth, Texas 76102

Any stockholder who wishes to assert appraisal rights should not submit an election form, as doing so will be considered a withdrawal of any previously filed written demand for appraisal.

        Within ten days after the effective date of the merger, Resaca, as the surviving corporation, must send a notice that the merger has become effective to each of Cano's former stockholders who has properly made a written demand for appraisal in accordance with Section 262 and who has not voted to adopt the merger agreement, referred to in this proxy statement as a dissenting stockholder. Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger, but not after that date, either Resaca or any dissenting stockholder may commence an appraisal proceeding by filing a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery demanding a determination of the fair value of common stock held by all dissenting stockholders. Resaca is under no obligation, and has no present intent, to file a petition for appraisal, and stockholders seeking to exercise appraisal rights should not assume that Resaca will file a petition or that it will initiate any negotiations with respect to the fair value of the shares. Accordingly, stockholders who desire to have their shares appraised should initiate any petitions necessary for the perfection of their appraisal rights within the time periods and in the manner prescribed in Section 262. Since Resaca has no obligation to file a petition, the failure of affected stockholders to do so within the period specified could nullify any previous written demand for appraisal. As used in this paragraph and throughout the remainder of this section, references to Resaca mean the corporation that survives the merger.

        Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger, any dissenting stockholder will be entitled to receive from Resaca, upon written request, a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares of Cano preferred stock not voted in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement and with respect to which Cano received demands for appraisal and the aggregate number of holders of those shares. Resaca must mail this statement to the stockholder by the later of ten days after receipt of the request and ten days after expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisals under Section 262. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a person who is the beneficial owner of shares of Cano preferred stock held either in a voting trust or by a nominee on behalf of such person may, in such person's own name, file a petition or request for the statement described in this paragraph.

        A stockholder who timely files a petition for appraisal with the Delaware Court of Chancery must serve a copy upon Resaca. Resaca must, within 20 days, file with the Delaware Register in Chancery a duly verified list containing the names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded appraisal of their shares of Cano preferred stock and who have not reached agreements with it as to the value of their shares. After notice to stockholders as may be ordered by the Delaware Court of Chancery, the Delaware Court of Chancery is empowered to conduct a hearing on the petition to determine which stockholders are entitled to appraisal rights. The Delaware Court of Chancery may require stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for their shares of Cano preferred stock and who hold shares represented by certificates to submit their certificates to the Register in Chancery for notation on the certificates of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings. If any stockholder fails to comply with the requirement, the Delaware Court of Chancery may dismiss the proceedings as to that stockholder.

        After determining which stockholders are entitled to an appraisal, the Delaware Court of Chancery will appraise the "fair value" of their shares of Cano preferred stock and the appraisal proceeding shall be conducted in accordance with the rules of the Delaware Court of Chancery, including any rules specifically governing appraisal proceedings. This value will exclude any element of value arising from

I-111


Table of Contents


the accomplishment or expectation of the merger, together with interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be the fair value. Unless the Delaware Court of Chancery in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause shown, interest from the effective date of the merger through the date of payment of the judgment shall be compounded quarterly and shall accrue at 5% over the Federal Reserve discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time to time during the period between the effective date of the merger and the date of payment of the judgment. The costs of the action may be determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery and taxed upon the parties as the Delaware Court of Chancery deems equitable under the circumstances. However, costs do not include attorneys' or expert witness fees. Upon application of a stockholder, the Delaware Court of Chancery may also order that all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding be charged pro rata against the value of all of the shares entitled to appraisal. These expenses may include, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and the fees and expenses of experts. Stockholders considering seeking appraisal should be aware that the fair value of their shares as determined under Section 262 could be more than, the same as, or less than the value of the merger consideration they would be entitled to receive pursuant to the merger agreement if they did not seek appraisal of their shares. Stockholders should also be aware that investment banking opinions as to fairness from a financial point of view are not opinions as to fair value under Section 262. Although Cano believes that the merger consideration is fair, no representation is made as to the outcome of the appraisal of fair value as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery, and stockholders should recognize that such an appraisal could result in a determination of a value higher or lower than, or the same as, the merger consideration. Neither Resaca nor Cano anticipate offering more than the applicable merger consideration to any holder of share of Cano preferred stock exercising appraisal rights, and reserve the right to assert, in any appraisal proceeding, that for purposes of Section 262, the "fair value" of a share of Cano preferred stock is less than the applicable merger consideration. The Delaware courts have stated that the methods which are generally considered acceptable in the financial community and otherwise admissible in court may be considered in the appraisal proceedings. In addition, the Delaware courts have decided that the statutory appraisal remedy, depending on factual circumstances, may or may not be a dissenting stockholder's exclusive remedy.

        From and after the effective date of the merger, no dissenting stockholder shall be entitled to vote the shares of Cano preferred stock subject to that demand for any purpose or be entitled to receive payment of dividends or other distributions on those shares. However, stockholders will be entitled to dividends or other distributions payable to holders of record of shares of Cano preferred stock as of a record date prior to the effective date of the merger.

        Any dissenting stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party may withdraw its demand for appraisal and accept the merger consideration by delivering to Resaca a written withdrawal of the stockholder's demands for appraisal within 60 days after the effective date of the merger or, if such written withdrawal is made more than 60 days after the effective date of the merger, with the written approval of Resaca. If a dissenting stockholder fails to perfect, successfully withdraws or loses such holder's right to appraisal, then the right of that dissenting stockholder to an appraisal will cease and the dissenting stockholder will be entitled to receive only the merger consideration. No appraisal proceeding before the Delaware Court of Chancery as to any stockholder will be dismissed without the approval of the Delaware Court of Chancery, and this approval may be conditioned upon any terms the Delaware Court of Chancery deems just; provided, however, that any dissenting stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party may withdraw his, her or its demand for appraisal and accept the merger consideration offered pursuant to the merger agreement within 60 days after the effective date of the merger. If Resaca does not approve a stockholder's request to withdraw a demand for appraisal when the approval is required, or, except with respect to any dissenting stockholder who withdraws such stockholder's right to appraisal in accordance with the proviso in the immediately preceding sentence, if the Delaware Court of Chancery does not approve the dismissal of

I-112


Table of Contents


an appraisal proceeding, the stockholder would be entitled to receive only the appraised value determined in any such appraisal proceeding. This value could be higher or lower than, or the same as, the value of the merger consideration.

        Failure to strictly follow the steps required by Section 262 for perfecting appraisal rights will result in the loss of appraisal rights, in which event you will be entitled to receive the consideration with respect to your dissenting shares in accordance with the merger agreement. In view of the complexity of the provisions of Section 262, if you are considering exercising your appraisal rights under the DGCL, you are urged to consult your own legal advisor.


Cano Voting Agreements

        Cano has entered into separate stock voting agreements with the holders of a majority of the outstanding Cano preferred stock. These voting agreements provide, among other things, that such holders will vote all of their respective shares of Cano preferred stock (a) in favor of the Cano Series D Amendment, (b) in favor of adoption of the merger agreement, and (c) in accordance with the recommendation of the Cano board of directors in connection with any Acquisition Proposal (as such term is defined in the merger agreement).

        Additionally, each such holder has also agreed to deliver an irrevocable proxy to Cano and not to transfer any of its shares of Cano preferred stock during the term of the voting agreement. The voting agreements will terminate on the earlier of (a) the effective time of the merger, (b) the termination of the merger agreement in accordance with its terms, (c) any amendment, modification or supplement to the merger agreement or any waiver by any party thereto that is adverse to the interests of such holders without the prior written consent of a majority of holders of the Cano preferred stock, and (d) the failure of Resaca to assume certain of Cano's obligations with respect to the Cano preferred stock.

        In addition, on October 20, 2009, Cano entered into a stock voting agreement with S. Jeffrey Johnson, Cano's Chief Executive Officer and a member of Cano's board of directors. See "—Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger—Voting Agreement."


Investors Rights Agreement with Holders of Resaca Preferred Stock

        In connection with the issuance of the Resaca preferred stock to the current holders of the Cano preferred stock, Resaca entered into an investors rights agreement with the holders of the Resaca preferred stock on April 5, 2010. The following is a summary of selected provisions of the investors rights agreement. However, you should read the investors rights agreement, which is filed as Annex F to this proxy statement, for other provisions that may be important to you.

        Registration Rights    The investors rights agreement grants such shareholders substantially similar registration and other rights currently associated with the Cano preferred stock. Specifically, the investors rights agreement requires that Resaca will file a registration statement with the SEC covering the resale of the Resaca common stock underlying the Resaca preferred stock within 45 days after the effective date of the merger. If the registration statement is not filed with the SEC within such time, Resaca must pay 1.5% of the aggregate purchase price of the Resaca preferred stock and an additional 1.5% for every 30 days the registration statement is not filed. If the registration statement is not declared effective by the SEC within 90 days of the effective date of the merger if there is not any review of the registration statement by the SEC or within 120 days of the effective date of the merger if there is any review of the registration statement by the SEC, Resaca must pay 1.5% of the aggregate purchase price of the Resaca preferred stock and an additional 1.5% for every 30 days it is not effective. In addition, subject to certain exceptions, Resaca is to maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement and if the effectiveness of the registration statement is not maintained, then Resaca must pay 1.5% of the aggregate purchase price of the Resaca preferred stock and an additional

I-113


Table of Contents


1.5% for every 30 days it is not maintained. The maximum aggregate of all registration delay payments is 10% of the aggregate purchase price of the Resaca preferred stock.

        Pledging of Resaca Preferred Stock.    Resaca preferred stock may be pledged by an investor in connection with a bona fide margin agreement or other loan or financing arrangement that is secured by the Resaca preferred stock. The pledge of Resaca preferred stock shall not be deemed to be a transfer, sale, or assignment of such stock.

        Additional Registration Statements.    Except for registration statements filed in connection with the merger or the offering, until the date that a registration statement covering the shares of Resaca common stock issuable upon conversion of the Resaca preferred stock becomes effective, Resaca shall not file a registration statement under the Securities Act relating to securities that are not Resaca preferred stock or Resaca common stock issuable upon conversion of Resaca preferred stock.

        Corporate Existence.    So long as any Resaca preferred stock is owned, Resaca shall not be party to any Fundamental Transaction (as defined in the Resaca Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations) unless Resaca is in compliance with the applicable provisions governing Fundamental Transactions set forth in the Resaca Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations.

        Reservation of Shares of Common Stock.    Resaca shall take all action necessary to at all times have authorized, and reserved for the purpose of issuance, no less than 130% of the maximum number of shares of Resaca common stock issuable upon conversion of the Resaca preferred stock.

        Additional Issuances of Resaca Equity.    Until no Resaca preferred stock remains outstanding, Resaca will not, directly or indirectly, offer, sell, grant any option to purchase, or otherwise dispose of (or announce any offer, sale, grant or any option to purchase or other disposition of) any of its or its subsidiaries' equity or equity equivalent securities, at any time during its life and under any circumstances, convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for shares of Resaca common stock or Resaca common stock equivalents, which we refer to as a subsequent placement, unless Resaca shall has, among other things, completed the following:

I-114


Table of Contents

        Notwithstanding the foregoing, the foregoing preemptive rights of the Resaca preferred stockholders do not extend to issuances of excluded securities (as defined in "Description of Resaca Capital Stock—Resaca Preferred Stock—Adjustments to Conversion Price" on page I-139) or the issuance of Resaca common stock in the offering, regardless of whether the offering occurs before, simultaneously with or after the merger.


NYSE Amex Listing of Resaca Common Stock; Delisting and Deregistration of Cano Common Stock

        Before the completion of the merger, Resaca has agreed to use all reasonable efforts to cause all outstanding shares of Resaca common stock and the shares of Resaca common stock to be issued in the merger and reserved for issuance under any equity awards to be approved for listing on the NYSE Amex. Such approval is a condition to the completion of the merger. On March 30, 2010, the combined company was approved for listing on the NYSE Amex upon notice of issuance. If the merger is completed, Cano common stock will cease to be listed on the NYSE Amex and its shares will be deregistered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

I-115


Table of Contents


MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER

        The following discussion is a summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger to holders of Cano common stock and Cano preferred stock and is the opinion of Thompson & Knight LLP insofar as it relates to matters of U.S. federal income tax law and legal conclusions with respect to those matters. This discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code, applicable U.S. Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, administrative rulings and judicial authorities, each as in effect as of the date of this document and all of which are subject to change at any time, possibly with retroactive effect. In addition, this discussion does not address any state, local or foreign tax consequences of the merger.

        This discussion addresses only Cano stockholders who hold Cano common stock or Cano preferred stock as a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code (generally, property held for investment). It does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to a particular Cano stockholder in light of that stockholder's individual circumstances or to a Cano stockholder who is subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax law, including, without limitation:

        For purposes of this discussion, "U.S. Holder" refers to a beneficial owner of Cano common stock or Cano preferred stock that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (1) an individual citizen or resident of the United States; (2) a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia; (3) an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or (4) a trust if it (A) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (B) has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.

        The term "Non-U.S. Holder" means a beneficial owner of Cano common stock or Cano preferred stock that is neither a U.S. Holder nor an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A Non-U.S. Holder does not include a holder who is an individual present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the merger and who is not otherwise a resident of the United States for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

I-116


Table of Contents

        If an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds Cano common stock or Cano preferred stock, the tax treatment of a partner in that partnership generally will depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of that partnership. A partner in a partnership holding Cano common stock or Cano preferred stock should consult its tax advisor regarding the tax consequences of the merger.

        Cano stockholders should consult their tax advisors as to the specific tax consequences to them of the merger in light of their particular circumstances, including the applicability and effect of U.S. federal, state, local and foreign income and other tax laws.

        General.    The merger has been structured to qualify as a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. It is a condition to the completion of the merger that Cano receive a written opinion from its tax counsel, Thompson & Knight, dated as of the date of completion of the merger, to the effect that the merger will be treated as a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and that Cano and Resaca will each be a party to the reorganization within the meaning of Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code. This opinion will be based on representations provided by Resaca, Merger Sub and Cano to be delivered at the time of closing and on customary assumptions. If any such representation or assumption is inaccurate, the tax consequences of the merger to holders of Cano common stock and Cano preferred stock could differ materially from those described below.

        No ruling has been or will be sought from the Internal Revenue Service as to the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger and an opinion of counsel is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service or any court. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service will not disagree with or challenge any of the conclusions described herein.

        In addition, in connection with the filing of the registration statement of which this proxy statement is a part, Cano has received a legal opinion from Thompson & Knight LLP, to the same effect as the opinions described above.

        U.S. Holders—Exchange of Cano Common Stock for Resaca Common Stock.    The material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger to a U.S. Holder of Cano common stock who, pursuant to the merger, exchanges his or her Cano common stock for Resaca common stock are as follows:

        If a holder acquired different blocks of Cano common stock at different times or different prices, such holder's tax basis and holding periods in its Resaca common stock may be determined with reference to each block of Cano common stock.

        U.S. Holders—Exchange of Cano Preferred Stock for Resaca Preferred Stock.    The material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger to a U.S. Holder of Cano preferred stock who, pursuant to the merger, exchanges his or her Cano preferred stock for Resaca preferred stock are as follows:

I-117


Table of Contents

        If a holder acquired different blocks of Cano preferred stock at different times or different prices, such holder's tax basis and holding periods in its Resaca preferred stock may be determined with reference to each block of Cano preferred stock.

        U.S. Holders—Cash in Lieu of Fractional Shares.    A U.S. Holder of Cano common stock who receives cash in lieu of a fractional share of Resaca common stock generally will be treated as having received such fractional share in the merger and then as having received cash in exchange for such fractional share. Gain or loss generally will be recognized based on the difference between the amount of cash received in lieu of the fractional share and the tax basis allocated to such fractional share of Resaca common stock. Such gain or loss generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if, as of the effective date of the merger, the holding period in the Cano common stock exchanged is greater than one year.

        Non-U.S. Holders.    Special rules may apply to certain Non-U.S. Holders, such as U.S. expatriates, controlled foreign corporations, passive foreign investment companies, persons who actually or constructively own, or have owned, more than 5% of Cano's equity at any time during the five-year period ending at the date of completion of the merger, and corporations that accumulate earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax. Such Non-U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors to determine the U.S. federal, state, local and other tax consequences that may be relevant to them.

        The following discussion assumes that Cano common stock will continue to be regularly traded on the NYSE Amex leading up to and as of the effective time of the merger, and that Resaca common stock will continue to be regularly traded on the AIM and/or the NYSE Amex as of and after the effective time of the merger, such that, in each case, Cano common stock and Resaca common stock will be considered to be "regularly traded on an established securities market" for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code.

        As a result of the merger, a Non-U.S. Holder will recognize gain or loss to the same extent that a U.S. Holder will recognize gain as described above. Any gain recognized by a Non-U.S. Holder will constitute capital gain and generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax unless:

        In either of those cases, the Non-U.S. Holder generally will be treated in the same manner as a U.S. Holder, as described above. A Non-U.S. Holder described in the first bullet above will be subject to a flat 30% tax on any gain recognized, which may be offset by U.S. source capital losses. A Non-U.S. Holder described in the second bullet above will be subject to tax on any gain recognized at applicable U.S. federal income tax rates and, in addition, may be subject to a branch profits tax (if the Non-U.S. Holder is a corporation) equal to 30% (or lesser rate under an applicable income tax treaty) on his or her effectively connected earnings and profits for the taxable year, which would include such gain.

I-118


Table of Contents

        Information Reporting and Backup Withholding.    A Cano stockholder may be subject to information reporting and backup withholding on any cash payment received in lieu of a fractional share of Resaca common stock, unless such stockholder properly establishes an exemption or provides a correct taxpayer identification number, and otherwise complies with backup withholding rules. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules are not an additional tax and may be allowed as a refund or credit against such holder's U.S. federal income tax liability, provided the required information is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.

        The foregoing discussion is not intended to be legal or tax advice to any particular Cano stockholder. Tax matters regarding the merger are very complicated, and the tax consequences of the merger to any particular Cano stockholder will depend on that stockholder's particular situation. Cano stockholders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the specific tax consequences of the merger, including tax return reporting requirements, the applicability of U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax laws and the effect of any proposed change in the tax laws to them.

I-119


Table of Contents


THE MERGER AGREEMENT

        The following discussion summarizes material provisions of the merger agreement, a copy of which is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement. The rights and obligations of the parties are governed by the express terms and conditions of the merger agreement and not by this summary. We urge you to read the merger agreement carefully in its entirety, as well as this proxy statement, before making any decisions regarding the merger. Unless stated otherwise, all information in this proxy statement, including but not limited to share calculations and the exchange ratio in the merger, is presented as if the Resaca shareholders have approved, and Resaca has implemented immediately prior to the merger, the Reverse Stock Split.

        The representations and warranties described below and included in the merger agreement were made by Resaca and Cano to each other as of specific dates. The assertions embodied in those representations and warranties were made solely for purposes of the merger agreement and may be subject to important qualifications and limitations agreed to by Resaca and Cano in connection with negotiating its terms. Moreover, the representations and warranties may be subject to a contractual standard of materiality that may be different from what may be viewed as material to the Cano stockholders or the Resaca shareholders, or may have been used for the purpose of allocating risk between Resaca and Cano rather than establishing matters as facts. The merger agreement is described in this proxy statement and included as Annex A only to provide you with information regarding its terms and conditions, and not to provide any other factual information regarding Resaca, Cano or their respective businesses. Accordingly, you should not rely on the representations and warranties in the merger agreement as characterizations of the actual state of facts about Resaca or Cano, and you should read the information provided elsewhere in this proxy statement for information regarding Resaca and Cano and their respective businesses. See "Where You Can Find More Information" beginning on page II-8 of this proxy statement.

        The merger agreement contains representations and warranties Resaca and Cano made to each other. The assertions embodied in those representations and warranties are qualified by information in confidential disclosure schedules that Resaca and Cano have exchanged in connection with signing the merger agreement. While we do not believe that they contain information securities laws require us to publicly disclose other than information that has already been so disclosed, the disclosure schedules do contain information that modifies, quantifies and creates exceptions to the representations and warranties set forth in the attached merger agreement. Accordingly, you should not rely on the representations and warranties as characterizations of the actual state of facts, since they are modified in important part by the underlying disclosure schedules. These disclosure schedules contain information that has been included in Cano's prior public disclosures, as well as potential additional non-public information. Moreover, information concerning the subject matter of the representations and warranties may have changed since the date of the merger agreement, which subsequent information may or may not be fully reflected in our public disclosures.


General

        Under the merger agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into Cano, with Cano being the surviving entity and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resaca following completion of the merger. In the merger, Cano common stockholders will receive Resaca common stock and Cano preferred stockholders will receive Resaca preferred stock of Resaca, as described below under "—Manner and Basis of Converting Securities."

        The merger agreement provides that the closing of the merger will take place on the second business day on which all of the conditions to closing of the merger are satisfied or waived, or on such other date agreed to by Resaca and Cano. Resaca and Cano anticipate that the closing will occur immediately following the Resaca shareholder and Cano stockholder meetings, the effectiveness of the Cano Series D Amendment and the effectiveness of the Resaca Charter Amendment. The filing of a certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of Delaware will be made on the date of the closing. The merger will become effective on the date of filing of such certificate of merger or on a date agreed

I-120


Table of Contents


to by the parties to the merger as stated in the certificate of merger. Resaca and Cano currently expect to consummate the merger by the end of June 2010. However, it is possible that factors outside of either company's control could require Resaca or Cano to complete the merger at a later time or not to complete it at all.


Manner and Basis of Converting Securities

        Cano Common Stock.    At the time the merger becomes effective, each outstanding share of Cano common stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.42 shares of Resaca common stock. After the time the merger becomes effective, upon presentation of certificates for Cano common stock, those certificates will be cancelled and exchanged as set forth in the merger agreement. Holders will receive an amount in cash in lieu of fractional shares.

        Resaca and Merger Sub Common Stock.    All Resaca common stock that is issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger, and after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split, will remain issued and outstanding immediately following the completion of the merger. In the merger, each share of common stock of Merger Sub will, at the effective time of the merger, become one share of stock of Cano, which will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resaca.

        Cano Preferred Stock.    At the time the merger becomes effective, each outstanding share of Cano preferred stock will be converted into the right to receive one share of Resaca preferred stock. After the time the merger becomes effective, upon presentation of certificates for Cano preferred stock, those certificates will be cancelled and exchanged as set forth in the merger agreement. See "Description of Resaca Capital Stock—Resaca Preferred Stock" beginning on page I-138 for a description of the rights, privileges and preferences of the Resaca preferred stock.

        Cano Stock Options.    Immediately prior to completion of the merger, each Cano option will automatically become fully vested. In the merger, each Cano option to acquire Cano common stock will automatically become a fully vested option (i) to purchase that number of shares of Resaca common stock obtained by multiplying the number of shares of Cano common stock issuable upon the exercise of such option by the exchange ratio of 0.42, (ii) at an exercise price per share equal to the per share exercise price of such option divided by the exchange ratio of 0.42, and (iii) otherwise with the same terms and conditions as such outstanding options. However, in any event the exercise price, the number of shares purchasable pursuant to the option and the terms and conditions of exercise of such option will be determined in accordance with the requirements of Section 424(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and in a manner that does not cause any option to be deferred compensation subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Resaca will take all corporate actions necessary to reserve for issuance a sufficient number of shares of Resaca common stock for delivery upon exercise of the Cano options described above.

        Cano Restricted Stock.    Immediately prior to the completion of the merger, all restrictions on Cano restricted stock awards will expire and each outstanding share will be converted into the right to receive 0.42 shares of Resaca common stock at the effective time of the merger. Holders will receive an amount in cash in lieu of fractional shares.

        Resaca Stock Options and Restricted Stock.    Resaca's stock option agreements and restricted stock award agreements give the holders of such stock options or restricted stock additional rights if there is a change of control of Resaca. The Resaca board of directors has the power, and has elected, to waive such additional rights with respect to all outstanding Resaca stock options and restricted stock awards in connection with the merger. Each Resaca stock option and restricted stock award outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger will remain outstanding immediately following the completion of the merger, without impact on vesting, exercise price or other restrictions of such stock options or restricted stock awards; provided, however, that the exercise price and/or the number of

I-121


Table of Contents


shares of Resaca common stock issuable under Resaca's outstanding stock options will be proportionately adjusted as a result of the Reverse Stock Split.

        Surrender and Payment.    Prior to the effective time of the merger, Resaca will deposit with an exchange agent, certificates representing the Resaca common stock and Resaca preferred stock to be issued and cash, if any, to be paid to the Cano common stockholders for fractional shares, if any. Within five business days after the merger, the exchange agent will send to each holder of record of Cano common and preferred stock certificates a letter of transmittal and instructions for use in effecting the exchange of their certificates for Resaca common stock or Resaca preferred stock or, in the case of fractional shares of Resaca common stock, cash. The exchange agent will exchange (i) whole shares of the Resaca common stock for surrendered shares of Cano common stock; (ii) the Resaca preferred stock for surrendered shares of Cano preferred stock and (iii) cash in lieu of fractional shares of Resaca common stock, pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement.

        If your Cano stock certificate has been lost, stolen or destroyed, you may make an affidavit of that fact and, if required by Resaca, post bond in such reasonable amount as Resaca may direct as indemnity against any claim that may be made against it with respect to such Cano stock certificate. Upon receipt of the affidavit and bond, if any, the exchange agent will issue in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed Cano stock certificate the requisite merger consideration.

        Before any person, entity or organization that is not the record holder of surrendered Cano common or preferred stock certificate(s) receives any of the merger consideration discussed above, (i) the surrendered stock certificate(s) must be properly endorsed or otherwise in proper form for transfer and (ii) the person, entity or organization owning the Cano common stock or Cano preferred stock must pay the exchange agent any transfer or other taxes required as a result of such issuance of merger consideration unless he or she establishes to the exchange agent's satisfaction that such tax has been paid or is not applicable.

        Any shares of Resaca common stock or Resaca preferred stock and cash that remain unclaimed one year after the effective time of the merger will be returned to Resaca. Any holder of Cano common stock or Resaca preferred stock who has not exchanged his or her certificates representing such stock prior to that time may thereafter look only to Resaca, as general creditor, to exchange his or her stock certificates or to pay amounts to which he or she is entitled pursuant to the merger agreement. None of Cano, Resaca or Merger Sub will be liable to any holder of Cano common stock certificates or Cano preferred stock certificates for any amount paid, or merger consideration delivered, to a public official pursuant to applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar laws.

        Resaca will act as the exchange agent for the redemption of the Cano options.

        Dissenting Shares.    Holders of Cano preferred stock who do not vote in favor of the merger (or consent to the merger in writing) may exercise appraisal rights under Section 262 of the DGCL. If a stockholder exercise appraisal rights, his or her shares shall represent only the right to receive the amount determined in accordance with Delaware law rather than the Resaca preferred stock to which he or she would otherwise be entitled. If the stockholder withdraws or otherwise loses his or her appraisal rights, then, he or she shall be entitled to receive Resaca preferred stock as if he or she had not exercised his or her appraisal rights. See "The Merger—Appraisal Rights" beginning on page I-109 and "Section 262 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware" attached as Annex E to this proxy statement.


Representations and Warranties

        The merger agreement contains customary representations and warranties of Resaca and Cano relating to various aspects of the respective businesses and financial statements of the parties and other

I-122


Table of Contents


matters. The representations and warranties will not survive the merger, but they will serve as the basis of conditions to each of Resaca's and Cano's obligations to complete the merger.


Conduct of Business Pending the Merger

        Resaca and Cano have agreed that, prior to the merger, each party will operate its business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice and will use all commercially reasonable efforts to preserve intact its business organizations and relationships with third parties and to keep available the services of its present officers and key employees.

        In addition, the merger agreement places specific restrictions on the ability of Resaca and Cano (and Cano's subsidiaries) to, among other things:


Certain Additional Provisions

        Tax Treatment of the Merger.    Resaca and Cano have agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the merger to qualify, and will not take, and will use all commercially reasonable efforts to

I-123


Table of Contents

prevent any subsidiary of Resaca or Cano (as applicable) from taking any actions which would prevent the merger from qualifying, as a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of the provisions of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.

        Acquisition Proposals (No-Shop Provisions).    Until the termination of the merger agreement, Resaca, Cano and their officers, directors and agents will not:

        However, Cano and Resaca may under certain circumstances communicate and negotiate with third parties that make bona fide unsolicited written acquisition proposals that could result in a transaction more favorable from a financial point of view to its stockholders or shareholders.

        The term "acquisition proposal" means any inquiry or proposal relating to any acquisition of (i) assets or businesses representing 10% or more of Resaca or Cano (as applicable) or (ii) 10% or more of the outstanding equity interests in Resaca or Cano (as applicable) or any of its subsidiaries, individually or taken together, holding such assets or businesses. Neither Resaca nor Cano will waive any provisions of a confidentiality agreement entered into with any person who has indicated a willingness to make an acquisition proposal with respect to it. However, Resaca or Cano may waive any provision of any stand-still or similar agreement in effect on the date of the merger agreement to allow a person to make an acquisition proposal, so long as on that date, the person making the acquisition proposal becomes subject to stand-still provisions at least as restrictive as those in confidentiality agreements between Resaca and Cano.

        In addition, each company has agreed to inform the other of any acquisition proposal or negotiations regarding an acquisition proposal.

        Board and Board Committees.    Resaca will use its best efforts to cause Donald W. Niemiec, William O. Powell, III and Garrett Smith, current members of Cano's board, to be elected as members of its board of directors simultaneous with the closing of the merger. At its annual meeting, Resaca has proposed that (i) Mr. Smith be elected to fill the vacancy created by Richard Kelly Plato's resignation as a Resaca Class II director, to serve as a director for a term expiring in 2013; (ii) Mr. Powell be elected as a Resaca Class I director, to serve as a director for a term expiring in 2012; and (iii) Mr. Niemiec be elected as a Resaca Class III director, to serve as a director for a term expiring in 2011.

        During the one year period following the merger, each committee of the Resaca board of directors will consist of three or four directors, at least two of whom will be directors who served on Cano's board of directors immediately before the merger.


Conditions to the Merger

        Conditions to the Obligations of Each Party.    Unless waived, the respective obligations of each party to effect the merger will be subject to the fulfillment of the following conditions:

I-124


Table of Contents

        Resaca and Cano currently expect each of these conditions to be satisfied prior to or promptly after the Resaca shareholder and Cano stockholder meetings.

        Conditions to Resaca's Obligations.    Unless waived by Resaca, the obligation of Resaca to effect the merger is subject to the following additional conditions, among others:

        Resaca and Cano currently expect each of these conditions to be satisfied prior to or promptly after the Resaca shareholder and Cano stockholder meetings.

        Conditions to Cano's Obligations.    Unless waived by Cano, the obligation of Cano to effect the merger is subject to the following additional conditions, among others:

I-125


Table of Contents

        Resaca and Cano currently expect each of these conditions to be satisfied prior to or promptly after the Resaca shareholder and Cano stockholder meetings.


Termination

        The merger agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the effective time, whether before or after approval by the Resaca shareholders or Cano stockholders:

I-126


Table of Contents

The term "superior proposal" means an unsolicited bona fide proposal made by a third party relating to an acquisition proposal on terms that the applicable board of directors determines, after consulting with financial advisors and outside counsel, would result in a transaction that is more favorable from a financial point of view to its stockholders.


Termination Fees and Expenses

        The merger agreement provides that, except as provided below, all expenses incurred by the parties will be borne by the party that has incurred such expenses. If the merger agreement is terminated for any reason, Cano and Resaca will share equally the expenses relating to this proxy statement (other than fees and expenses of outside counsel, accountants and financial advisors) and all regulatory filing fees.

        The merger agreement provides for the payment by either party to the other of a termination fee of $3.5 million if the merger agreement is terminated in the following circumstances:

        Payment of a Termination Fee by Resaca.    Resaca will pay Cano a $3.5 million termination fee if the merger agreement is terminated:

        The term "Takeover" means any direct or indirect acquisition by Cano or Resaca or any "group" (as such term is defined under Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder), in one transaction or a series of transactions, including any merger, consolidation, tender offer, exchange offer, stock acquisition, asset acquisition, binding share exchange, business combination, recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution, joint venture or similar transaction, of (A) assets or businesses that constitute or represent 50% or more of the total revenue, operating income, EBITDA or assets of either Resaca or Cano, as the case may be, and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole; (B) 50% or more of the outstanding shares of Cano or Resaca common stock or capital stock of, or other equity or voting interests in, any of their respective subsidiaries directly or indirectly holding, individually or taken together, the assets or business referred to in clause (A) above; or (C) 50% or more of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Cano or Resaca then representing 50% or more of the combined power to vote generally for the election of directors; provided, however, that any offering or sale by Cano or Resaca of additional shares of its respective common stock in one or more public offerings shall not be considered a Takeover.

I-127


Table of Contents

        Payment of a Termination Fee by Cano.    Cano will pay Resaca a $3.5 million termination fee if the merger agreement is terminated:


Amendment; Extension and Waiver

        Amendment.    Subject to the next sentence, the merger agreement may be amended at any time by the action or authorization of Resaca's board of directors and Cano's board of directors. If the merger agreement has been approved by the Resaca shareholders or the Cano stockholders, then no amendment can be entered into by that party if that amendment requires the further approval of Resaca shareholders or Cano stockholders, as applicable, without obtaining such further approval.

        Extension.    At any time prior to the effective time of the merger, Resaca and Cano may, to the extent permitted by law:

I-128


Table of Contents


THE COMPANIES

Resaca

        Resaca is an independent oil and gas development and production company based in Houston, Texas. Resaca's activities are currently focused on the exploitation of its portfolio of long-life properties, which have high levels of original oil in place, utilizing a variety of primary, secondary and tertiary recovery techniques. These properties are located in the Permian Basin of West Texas and Southeast New Mexico. Resaca routinely evaluates, and may acquire, further exploitation opportunities in the Permian Basin, other U.S. basins and in areas outside the United States.

        Resaca's June 30, 2009 proved reserves of 14.2 MMBOE were comprised of 2.4 MMBOE of PDP, 5.6 MMBOE of PDNP, and 6.2 MMBOE of PUD. Crude oil reserves accounted for 84% of our total proved reserves at June 30, 2009. Reserves were estimated using NYMEX, crude oil and natural gas prices and production and development costs in effect on June 30, 2009. On June 30, 2009, NYMEX crude oil and natural gas prices were $69.89 per barrel and $3.84 per MMBtu, respectively. The values reported may not necessarily reflect the fair market value of the reserves.

        For more information on Resaca, see "Where You Can Find More Information" on page II-8 and "Business & Financial Information of Resaca and Cano" beginning on page III-1.


Cano

        Cano is an independent oil and natural gas development and production company based in Fort Worth, Texas. Cano's strategy is to exploit its current undeveloped reserves and acquire, where economically prudent, assets suitable for enhanced oil recovery at a low cost. Cano intends to convert its proved undeveloped and/or unproved reserves into proved producing reserves by applying water, gas and/or chemical flooding and other EOR techniques. Its assets are located onshore U.S. in Texas, New Mexico and Oklahoma.

        During its first three years of operations, Cano's primary objective was to achieve growth through acquiring existing, mature crude oil and natural gas fields. The last two years Cano has focused on building the infrastructure and commencing waterflood operations in its two largest properties, Panhandle and Cato. Cano believes its portfolio of crude oil and natural gas properties provides opportunities to apply its operational strategy. Additionally, it will continue to evaluate acquisitions that are consistent with its operational strategy.

        Cano's June 30, 2009 proved reserves of 49.1 MMBOE, were comprised 7.7 MMBOE of PDP, 2.4 MMBOE of PDNP, and 39.0 MMBOE of PUD. Crude oil reserves accounted for 79% of our total reserves at June 30, 2009. Adjusting for Cano's sale of wells in the Panhandle Properties during January 2010, Cano's adjusted proved reserves at June 30, 2009 would be 48.6 MMBOE, which comprised 7.2 MMBOE of PDP, 2.4 MMBOE of PDNP, and 39.0 MMBOE of PUD; and crude oil reserves accounted for 80.2% of total proved reserves.

        For more information on Cano, see "Where You Can Find More Information" on page II-8 and "Business & Financial Information of Resaca and Cano" beginning on page III-1.


Merger Sub

        Merger Sub, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resaca, is a Delaware corporation formed on September 25, 2009, for the purpose of effecting the merger. Upon completion of the merger, Merger Sub will merge with and into Cano, and Cano will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resaca. Merger Sub has not conducted any activities other than those incidental to its formation and the matters contemplated by the merger agreement.

I-129


Table of Contents


MANAGEMENT

Current Directors, Executive Officers and Director Nominees

        The following table sets forth certain information as of the date of this document regarding our present executive officers, directors and director nominees and our executive officers and directors following the completion of the merger. The directors and executive officers hold office until their successors are duly elected and qualified, or until their earlier death, removal or resignation from office.

Name
  Age   Pre-Merger
Title
  Post-Merger
Title

J.P. Bryan

    70   Chairman of the Board of Directors   Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer

John J. Lendrum, III

    59   Chief Executive Officer and Director   Vice Chairman of the Board and Director

John William Sharp Bentley

    62   Director   Director

Judy Ley Allen

    71   Director and Director Nominee   Director

Richard Kelly Plato

    40   Director and Director Nominee  

Donald W. Niemiec*

    63   Cano Director and Director Nominee   Director

William O. Powell, III*

    63   Cano Director and Director Nominee   Director

Garrett Smith*

    48   Cano Director and Director Nominee   Director

Dennis Hammond

    54   President and Chief Operating Officer   President and Chief Operating Officer

Randy Ziebarth

    59   Vice President—Operations  

Mary Lou Fry

    52   Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary  

Chris Work

    41   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Lisa Cohen

    46   Vice President and Treasurer   Vice President and Treasurer

Ralph Carthrae

    66   Vice President—Marketing  

Robert Porter

    54   Vice President of Engineering   Vice President of Engineering

R. Keith Turner

    56   Vice President of Land   Vice President of Land

Michael J. Ricketts*

    52   Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer, Cano   Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

Phillip B. Feiner*

    36   Corporate Secretary, Vice President and General Counsel, Cano   Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

*
These directors and officers will be appointed upon the consummation of the merger.

I-130


Table of Contents

        The following biographies describe the business experience, pre-merger and post-merger, of our executive officers and directors (titles reflected below are such person's current position with Resaca or Cano):

J.P. Bryan, Chairman of the Board

        Mr. Bryan serves as Chairman of the Board of Resaca and has served in that capacity since July 2008, when Resaca converted to a corporation. Mr. Bryan also serves as Chief Executive Officer of Torch. Mr. Bryan has served as Torch's CEO since he formed Torch in 1981. Since inception, Torch has invested and managed over $3 billion in energy assets under Mr. Bryan's leadership. Mr. Bryan's role in these efforts has been leadership at the highest level: establishment of the company's strategic direction, investment and growth opportunity evaluation, negotiation and transaction execution as well as management of senior professional staff. During his 40-year career in the energy industry, Mr. Bryan has also served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of various independent exploration and production companies, including Bellwether Exploration Company, which we refer to as Bellwether, Nuevo Energy Company, which we refer to as Nuevo, and Gulf Canada Resources Limited. He is a former member of the board of directors of AutoNation, Inc., which sells new and used automobiles. Mr. Bryan earned a Bachelor's degree in Business and a Law degree from the University of Texas. He also received a degree in international business from the American Institute of Foreign Trade (Thunderbird). After the merger, Mr. Bryan will become Chief Executive Officer of the combined company.

        Mr. Bryan is a Class III director of Resaca and will hold office until the Resaca annual shareholder meeting in 2011 and until his successor is duly elected and qualified, or until his earlier death, resignation or removal.

John J. Lendrum, III, Chief Executive Officer and Director

        Mr. Lendrum became Chief Executive Officer of Resaca in August 2007 and has served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Torch since 2005. As CEO of Resaca, Mr. Lendrum is responsible for establishing overall strategic direction for Resaca and management of senior professional staff. Mr. Lendrum led the effort to take Resaca public on the AIM in July 2008 and continues to be the primary contact with Resaca's investors in London. Prior to 2005, Mr. Lendrum founded and presided as President of Rockport Resources Capital Corporation, which we refer to as Rockport, a firm that specialized in providing capital to the energy industry. In addition to his duties at Rockport and simultaneously, Mr. Lendrum was a principal in a private midstream gas company. From 1986 to 1993, Mr. Lendrum served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Torch and was involved in the management of Nuevo, Bellwether, and Energy Assets International Corporation. Prior to 1986, Mr. Lendrum was the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of a private oil and gas exploration company for four years. Mr. Lendrum began his professional career with KPMG Peat Marwick, where he worked for seven years. Mr. Lendrum graduated from the University of Texas in 1973 with an undergraduate degree in Finance and completed his graduate studies in Accounting Theory. In addition to his duties at Resaca and Torch, Mr. Lendrum serves on the board of directors of BPZ Energy, a company with oil and gas activities in South America. Mr. Lendrum will resign as Chief Executive Officer upon the completion of the merger, but he will continue to serve as a director of the combined company and Vice Chairman of the Board.

        Mr. Lendrum is a Class I director of Resaca and will hold office until the Resaca annual shareholder meeting in 2012 and until his successor is duly elected and qualified, or until his earlier death, resignation or removal.

I-131


Table of Contents

John William Sharp Bentley, Non-executive Director

        Mr. Bentley has over 40 years' experience in the natural resources sector. He currently serves on the boards of a number of public companies having joined CDS Oil & Gas Group, plc as Chairman in 2005, Faroe Petroleum, plc as Chairman in 2007 and Artumas Group, Inc. as Chairman in 2007 and Scotgold Resources Ltd as Chairman in 2009. Mr. Bentley has focused exclusively on board and advisory positions since 2007. He was Executive Chairman of FirstAfrica Oil plc from September 2006 until its acquisition by BowLeven plc in early 2007. From 2004 through 2006 he was initially Advisor and subsequently Vice Chairman of Vanco Energy Company with responsibility for preparing the company for a public listing. In 2001, he founded Osprey Oil & Gas Ltd with a number of financial institutions and was its CEO until 2004. From 1993 until 2001, Mr. Bentley held various positions with Engen and its affiliate, Energy Africa Limited. In 1993, Mr. Bentley became Chief Executive Officer of Engen's Exploration and Production division. In 1996, he was instrumental in spinning off Energy Africa Limited from Engen and listing it on the Johannesburg and Luxembourg stock exchanges. From 1988 to 1993, Mr. Bentley was Managing Director of Gencor's Brazilian mining company, Sao Bento Mineracao. Mr. Bentley holds a degree in Metallurgy from Brunel University.

        Mr. Bentley is a Class I director of Resaca and will hold office until the Resaca annual shareholder meeting in 2012 and until his successor is duly elected and qualified, or until his earlier death, resignation or removal.

Judy Ley Allen, Non-executive Director and Director Nominee

        Ms. Allen has been an asset manager since 1977 for Allen Investments, a private company which has significant holdings in oil and gas, real estate, timberland and stocks and bonds. She is a former director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas and currently sits on the Advisory Board of Governors of Rice University. She is an advisory trustee of the Houston Ballet Foundation and a trustee of the Houston Museum of Natural Science. Ms. Allen received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Stanford University and a Master's degree in Business Administration from Harvard Business School.

        Ms. Allen is a Class II director of Resaca and a nominee for election as a Class II director at the Resaca annual meeting of shareholders. If Ms. Allen is re-elected, she will serve as a Class II Director until the Resaca annual shareholder meeting in 2013 and until her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until her earlier death, resignation or renewal.

Richard Kelly Plato, Non-executive Director and Director Nominee

        Mr. Plato is Senior Vice President and Managing Director of NGP Capital Resources Company (NASDAQ:NGPC), which we refer to as NGP, a publicly traded financial services company organized to invest, primarily, in small and mid-size private energy companies. Mr. Plato joined NGP in January of 2005. Mr. Plato has 15 years of investment management, corporate finance, engineering and general management experience in the energy industry. Mr. Plato also serves on the Board of Managers of one of NGP's portfolio companies, Rubicon Energy Partners, LLC. Prior to joining NGP, Mr. Plato was a co-founder and partner of Odyssey Energy Capital, LLC, which we refer to as Odyssey, a private capital provider to the energy industry. Prior to Odyssey, Mr. Plato served in various management positions with Mirant Americas Energy Capital, LP, Tri-Union Development Corporation and Fina Oil and Chemical Company. Mr. Plato earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering from Texas A&M University and a Doctorate of Jurisprudence from South Texas College of Law.

        Mr. Plato is a Class II director of Resaca and a nominee for election as a Class II director at the Resaca annual meeting of shareholders. Resaca anticipates that Mr. Plato will resign from the board of directors of Resaca upon completion of the merger.

I-132


Table of Contents

Donald W. Niemiec, Director Nominee

        Mr. Niemiec is a nominee for election to the Resaca board of directors. Mr. Niemiec was appointed to the board of directors of Cano on March 2, 2007. From 2000 to the present, he has served as President of WR Energy, LLC, a strategic consulting company for the energy industry. From 1982 to 2000, Mr. Niemiec was employed in various capacities by Union Pacific Resources Group, Inc., including President of Union Pacific Fuels, Inc. and Vice President, Marketing & Corporate Development.

        If Mr. Niemiec is elected, he will serve as a Class III Director until the Resaca annual shareholder meeting in 2011 and until his successor is duly elected and qualified, or until his earlier death, resignation or removal.

William O. Powell, III, Director Nominee

        Mr. Powell is a nominee for election to the Resaca board of directors. Mr. Powell was appointed to the board of directors of Cano on March 12, 2007. From March 2005 to December 2006, Mr. Powell served as Vice President/Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of ABS Group of Companies. From October 2003 to March 2004, Mr. Powell was the Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer for La Quinta. From May 1974 to June 2002, Mr. Powell held various positions, including Worldwide Engagement Leader-Partner, with PricewaterhouseCoopers, focusing on energy companies. Mr. Powell is a Certified Public Accountant.

        If Mr. Powell is elected, he will serve as a Class I Director until the Resaca annual shareholder meeting in 2012 and until his successor is duly elected and qualified, or until his earlier death, resignation or removal.

Garrett Smith, Director Nominee

        Mr. Smith is a nominee for election to the Resaca board of directors. Mr. Smith was elected to the Board of Directors of Cano at its Annual Meeting of Stockholders on January 9, 2009. Mr. Smith founded the Spinnerhawk Companies and certain affiliates, which we refer to as Spinnerhawk, which make private investments in the energy, real estate and health care industries, in February 2005 where he has served as the CEO of Spinnerhawk since its inception. Before forming Spinnerhawk, Mr. Smith served as a member of the Investment Committee at BP Capital, a private investment firm that focused on investments in the energy sectors, from December 2001 to December 2004. He was also the portfolio manager of the BP Capital Energy Equity Fund, which he co-founded with T. Boone Pickens in 2000. Previously, Mr. Smith was Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Pioneer Natural Resources. Mr. Smith currently serves as a member of the board of directors of The Hallwood Group Incorporated and Pacific Energy Resources Limited.

        If Mr. Smith is elected, he will serve as a Class II Director until the Resaca annual shareholder meeting in 2013 and until his successor is duly elected and qualified, or until his earlier death, resignation or removal.

        The Resaca board is divided into three classes of directors, designated Class I, Class II and Class III (which at all times shall be as nearly equal in number as possible), with the term of office of each director ending on the date of the third annual meeting following the annual meeting at which such director was elected; provided, that the initial Class II directors, who are still serving from their initial appointment to the Resaca board, shall serve for a term expiring at the upcoming Resaca 2010 annual meeting of shareholders, and the initial Class III directors, who are still serving from their initial appointment to the board, shall serve for a term expiring at the Resaca 2011 annual meeting of shareholders. Each director shall hold office until his or her successor shall have been duly elected and qualified. The current Class I directors are Messrs. Bentley and Lendrum, who will hold office until the 2012 annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. The

I-133


Table of Contents


current Class II directors are Ms. Allen and Mr. Plato, who will hold office until the 2010 annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. The current Class III director is Mr. Bryan, who will hold office until the 2011 annual meeting of shareholders and until his successor is duly elected and qualified.

        Except for Dennis Hammond, President and Chief Operating Officer of Resaca, and Robert Porter, Vice President of Engineering of Resaca, who are full-time employees of Resaca, the following Torch employees are also co-employed by Resaca pursuant to the terms of a Co-Employer Agreement and such employees serve as part of the key management team of Resaca in the following capacities:

Dennis Hammond, President and Chief Operating Officer

        Mr. Hammond joined Resaca as the President and Chief Operating Officer in August 2007. At Resaca, Mr. Hammond serves as the chief production and engineering officer. Prior to joining Resaca, Mr. Hammond served as Vice President for Everlast Energy from 2002 until November 2005 and for Five Point Energy from October 2005 until August 2007, both successful oil and gas acquisition and exploitation firms which Mr. Hammond co-founded. Mr. Hammond managed all engineering and operational activities for both firms. Mr. Hammond worked as Vice President—Acquisitions for Torch, from 1987 until 1990, when he became Vice President—Exploitation for Nuevo. Mr. Hammond then managed all of Nuevo's operations and engineering efforts until 2002. Mr. Hammond began his career with Chevron in 1978 and has over 30 years of progressive experience in petroleum engineering. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in petroleum engineering from Texas A&M University and is a registered professional engineer in the State of Texas. After the merger, Mr. Hammond will serve as President and Chief Operating Officer of the combined company.

Robert Porter, Vice President of Engineering

        Mr. Porter joined Resaca as the Vice President of Engineering in September 2008. From 2003 until joining Resaca in September of 2008, Mr. Porter worked as a consultant for Constellation Energy Commodities Group managing the drilling, completions and production operations of a coal bed methane project in the Black Warrior Basin of Alabama. Prior to this long-term project, Mr. Porter worked with several mid-sized independent oil and gas companies in various engineering capacities. Mr. Porter began his career with Chevron in 1978 and has thirty years of experience in reservoir engineering, operations and economic evaluations. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in petroleum engineering from Texas A&M University. After the merger, Mr. Porter will serve the combined company as Vice President, Engineering.

Randy Ziebarth, Vice President—Operations

        Mr. Ziebarth has served as Vice President of Operations for Torch, since 1998, having originally joined Torch in 1993. In his current capacity, Mr. Ziebarth is responsible for many elements of Torch's business including midstream operations, commercial management, business and project development, acquisitions and divestitures, and planning and analysis. Mr. Ziebarth began his professional oil and gas career in 1976 and initially served in various operational capacities including production and drilling engineering positions and reservoir engineering applications. He has a broad and diverse experience base with mid-sized independent companies (including Maxus, Devon Energy, and Plains Resources) in both upstream and midstream operations. Mr. Ziebarth is a 1975 graduate of West Texas A&M University. After the merger, Mr. Ziebarth will continue to serve Torch in his current capacity and provide services to the combined company as needed under the Services Agreement.

Mary Lou Fry, Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

        Ms. Fry has served Torch as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since January 1, 2004. Her responsibilities include negotiating, drafting and closing transactions involving the

I-134


Table of Contents


acquisition, financing and management of producing oil and gas properties and midstream assets. Ms. Fry joined Torch's legal group in 1992. Prior to that time, she worked in the exploration and production area of the Shell Oil Company legal department from 1990 until 1992. She began her career with the Houston office of Mayer, Brown & Platt, LLP (now Mayer Brown) in 1983 where she was a member of the Natural Resources, Finance and Real Estate practice groups. Ms. Fry is admitted to practice law in the State of Texas. She is a 1983 graduate of Vanderbilt University School of Law and a 1980 graduate of the University of Kentucky Business School with an honors degree in Economics. After the merger, Ms. Fry will continue to serve Torch in her current capacity and provide services to the combined company as needed under the Services Agreement.

Chris Work, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

        Mr. Work has served Torch as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since February of 2007. In addition to his accounting and corporate finance responsibilities, Mr. Work is responsible for Torch's information technology functions. Prior to joining Torch, Mr. Work served from 2004 to 2007 as Chief Financial Officer of a privately held residential mortgage bank. Prior to that time, Mr. Work held senior level management positions with El Paso Corporation and Belco Oil and Gas, two publicly held energy companies. In addition, Mr. Work has nearly eight years of public accounting experience with Arthur Andersen LLP and Ernst & Young LLP, where he primarily served oil and gas clients. Mr. Work is a certified public accountant and earned a Bachelor's degree in Accounting from Texas A&M University in 1990, graduating with honors. After the merger, Mr. Work will become Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the combined company.

Lisa Cohen, Vice President and Treasurer

        Ms. Cohen serves Torch as Vice President and Treasurer. In addition to the cash management function, Ms. Cohen is responsible for risk management and human resources for both Torch and Resaca. Ms. Cohen joined Torch in 2004. She worked for Gulf South Pipeline in Houston from 2003 to 2004. From 1988 to 1994, Ms. Cohen worked in the lease finance business in New York and San Francisco with D'Accord Financial Services, Inc. Ms. Cohen began her career in the financial services industry as an analyst for Kidder, Peabody & Co. in New York in 1986. Ms. Cohen earned her M.B.A. in Finance from New York University in 1992 and graduated from the University of Virginia in 1986 with a B.A. in English. After the merger, Ms. Cohen will continue to serve Torch in her current capacity and provide services to the combined company as needed under the Services Agreement. In addition, Ms. Cohen will serve the combined company as Vice President and Treasurer.

Ralph Carthrae, Vice President—Marketing

        Mr. Carthrae has served Torch in various capacities since joining the company in 1996. Currently he is responsible for business development, natural gas and crude oil purchase, marketing and transportation agreements and the hedging of production. Mr. Carthrae's career began at Conoco, Inc., where his last position was Director of Refinery Supply. He then held various positions with refining, exploration and production, pipeline, and storage companies. Mr. Carthrae graduated from Kansas State University with a Bachelor of Civil Engineering in 1967. After the merger, Mr. Carthrae will continue to serve Torch in his current capacity and provide services to the combined company as needed under the Services Agreement.

R. Keith Turner, Vice President of Land

        Mr. Turner joined Torch as Vice President of Land in November 2009. From 2003 until joining Torch in November 2009, Mr. Turner worked at Edge Petroleum Corporation as Vice President—Land and previously as Staff Attorney. Prior to his employment at Edge, Mr. Turner worked for several mid-size independent oil and gas companies in various land and legal capacities. Mr. Turner began his

I-135


Table of Contents


career with Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Company in 1977 and has over thirty years of professional experience in the industry. Mr. Turner is a 1976 graduate from Stephen F. Austin State University and a 1997 graduate from South Texas College of Law and a licensed attorney. After the merger, Mr. Turner will continue to serve Torch in his current capacity and provide services to the combined company as needed under the Services Agreement. In addition, Mr. Turner will serve the combined company as Vice President of Land.

        Resaca anticipates that the following employees of Cano will become employees and officers (in the same capacity as with Cano) of Resaca upon completion of the merger:

Michael J. Ricketts, Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer of Cano

        Mr. Ricketts was appointed Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Cano on May 28, 2004 and remained in both positions until June 1, 2006. From June 1, 2006 to present, Mr. Ricketts has served as the Principal Accounting Officer of Cano. Mr. Ricketts served as a member of the Board of Directors of Cano from June 25, 2004 until April 6, 2005. Mr. Ricketts is a Certified Public Accountant. Prior to joining Cano, Mr. Ricketts was employed by TNP Enterprises, Inc. and its subsidiaries, Texas-New Mexico Power Company and First Choice Power for 15 years where he served as Director, Treasury from 2003 to 2004, Director, Business Development from 2002 until 2003 and Controller and Assistant Controller from 1998 until 2002. After the merger, Mr. Ricketts will serve the combined company as Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer.

Phillip B. Feiner, Corporate Secretary, Vice President and General Counsel of Cano

        Mr. Feiner was appointed Vice President and General Counsel of Cano on May 7, 2008 and was Assistant General Counsel of Cano from February 2007 until May 7, 2008. From August 2005 until February 2007, Mr. Feiner maintained his own law practice specializing in real estate and corporate matters. Mr. Feiner served as General Counsel to BDS International, LLC, a Dallas-based exploration and development company, as well as its affiliate, Piute Pipeline from February 2002 until August 2005. He is a licensed attorney in the states of Texas and North Carolina. After the merger, Mr. Feiner will serve as Corporate Secretary, Vice President and General Counsel of the combined company.


Committees of the Resaca Board of Directors

        The Resaca board of directors has the committees listed below. During the one year period following the merger, pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, each committee of the Resaca board of directors will consist of three or four directors, at least two of whom will be directors who served on Cano's board of directors immediately before the merger. Messrs. Bentley, Niemiec, Powell and Smith and Ms. Allen satisfy standards for independence established by the SEC and the NYSE Amex. Messrs. Bryan and Lendrum do not satisfy the standards for independence established by the SEC and the NYSE Amex. Upon commencement of trading Resaca common stock on NYSE Amex, Resaca shall reconstitute its board committees such that the composition of all three committees is Ms. Allen and Messrs. Bentley and Plato. The combined company shall designate the members of its board committees immediately following the completion of the merger, however the combined company anticipates that the initial composition of such committees shall be as follows: (i) Audit Committee—Messrs. Bentley, Powell and Smith; (ii) Compensation Committee—Messrs. Bentley, Niemiec and Powell and Ms. Allen; and (iii) Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee—Messrs. Niemiec and Smith and Ms. Allen.

Audit Committee

        This committee, which prior to the commencement of trading Resaca common stock on NYSE Amex comprises Messrs. Plato (Chairman) and Bentley and Ms. Allen, reviews the annual financial statements, internal control matters and the scope and effectiveness of external audit. Representatives

I-136


Table of Contents


of senior management and the external auditors will normally attend meetings though such attendance is at the invitation of the committee. The external auditors will have unrestricted access to the chairman of the committee. In addition, the committee will review the necessity for the establishment of an internal audit function but considers that, given the size of Resaca and the close involvement of senior management in day-to-day operations, there is currently no requirement for such a function.

Compensation Committee

        This committee, which prior to the commencement of trading Resaca common stock on NYSE Amex comprises Ms. Allen (Chairman) and Messrs. Bryan and Bentley, determine Resaca's executive directors' compensation. Non-executive directors' fees will be considered and agreed to by the Resaca board of directors as a whole.

Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee

        This committee, which prior to the commencement of trading Resaca common stock on NYSE Amex comprises Messrs. Lendrum (Chairman), Bryan and Plato, (i) assists the Resaca board of directors and the Resaca shareholders by identifying individuals qualified to become Resaca board members, and selecting, or recommending that the Resaca board select, the director nominees for election at the annual or special meetings of the shareholders or for appointment to fill vacancies; (ii) recommends to the Resaca board director nominees for each committee of the board; (iii) advises the Resaca board about appropriate composition of the board and its committees; (iv) leads the Resaca board in its annual review of the performance of the board and its committees; and (v) performs such other functions as the Resaca board may assign to the committee from time to time.


Dealing Code

        The Resaca board complies with Rule 21 of the AIM Rules relating to dealings in Resaca's shares and Resaca has adopted a code on dealing in securities to ensure compliance by the directors and applicable employees.

I-137


Table of Contents


DESCRIPTION OF RESACA CAPITAL STOCK

        Pursuant to its charter, Resaca has the authority to issue an aggregate of 250,000,000 shares of capital stock, consisting of 230,000,000 shares of Resaca common stock and 20,000,000 shares of Resaca preferred stock. On May 28, 2010, Resaca had 96,947,494 shares of Resaca common stock outstanding and no shares of Resaca preferred stock outstanding. If the Resaca shareholders approve the Reverse Stock Split, the number of shares of Resaca capital stock authorized will remain unchanged and Resaca's 96,947,494 outstanding shares of Resaca common stock will be converted by a one-to-five ratio into approximately 19,389,499 shares of Resaca common stock outstanding immediately prior to the merger and issuance of additional shares in the offering.

        Selected provisions of Resaca's charter documents are summarized below, however, you should read the charter documents, which are filed as exhibits to the form S-4 registration statement of which this proxy statement is a part, for other provisions that may be important to you. In addition, you should be aware that the summary below does not give full effect to the terms of the provisions of statutory or common law which may affect your rights as a shareholder.


Resaca Common Stock

        Voting rights.    Each share of Resaca common stock is entitled to one vote in the election of directors and on all other matters submitted to a vote of Resaca's shareholders. Resaca's shareholders do not have the right to cumulate their votes in the election of directors.

        Dividends, distributions and stock splits.    Holders of Resaca common stock are entitled to receive dividends if, as and when such dividends are declared by Resaca's board out of assets legally available therefor after payment of dividends required to be paid on shares of Resaca preferred stock, if any.

        Liquidation.    In the event of any dissolution, liquidation, or winding up of Resaca's affairs, whether voluntary or involuntary, after payment of its debts and other liabilities and making provision for any holders of its Resaca preferred stock who have a liquidation preference, Resaca's remaining assets will be distributed ratably among the holders of Resaca common stock.

        Fully paid.    All shares of Resaca common stock outstanding are fully paid and nonassessable.

        Other rights.    Holders of Resaca common stock have no redemption or conversion rights and no preemptive or other rights to subscribe for its securities.


Resaca Preferred Stock

        Prior to the merger, Resaca's board of directors has the authority to issue up to 20,000,000 shares of Resaca preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions thereof, including dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion rates, voting rights, terms of redemption, redemption prices, liquidation preferences and the number of shares constituting any series or the designation of that series, which may be superior to those of the Resaca common stock, without further vote or action by the shareholders. One of the effects of undesignated preferred stock may be to enable Resaca's board of directors to render more difficult or to discourage an attempt to obtain control of Resaca by means of a tender offer, proxy contest, merger or otherwise, and as a result to protect the continuity of its management.

        In connection with the merger, the Resaca board of directors will adopt a resolution to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of a class of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, comprised of 49,116 shares, in the form of a Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, which we refer to as the Resaca Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations. The following is a summary of selected provisions of the Resaca Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations. However, you should read the proposed Resaca Preferred Stock Certificate

I-138


Table of Contents


of Designations, which is filed as an exhibit to this proxy statement, for other provisions that may be important to you.

        Dividends.    The Resaca preferred stock has a dividend rate of 7.875% per year (or 15% upon the occurrence of a Triggering Event (as defined below) payable quarterly in cash or in stock as an adjustment to the number of shares of Resaca common stock issuable upon conversion.

        Conversion Right.    Shares of Resaca preferred stock are convertible into shares of Resaca common stock at any time at an initial conversion price of $0.9926 per share (which does not reflect the Reverse Stock Split and will be adjusted to reflect the Reverse Stock Split), subject to adjustment for certain dilutive issuances, stock splits, stock dividends and other similar transactions.

        Adjustments to Conversion Price.    Immediately after certain dilutive issuances of Resaca common stock, subdivision (by stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization or otherwise) or combination (by combination, reverse stock split or otherwise) or any other events (such as the granting of stock appreciation rights, phantom stock rights or other rights with equity features), the conversion price shall be adjusted. Issuances of Resaca common stock or common stock equivalents (other than certain excluded issuances as discussed below, which we refer to as excluded securities) at a per share price less than the then conversion price in effect immediately prior to such issuances shall result in a weighed average conversion price adjustment; provided, however, that for the first nine (9) months following the initial issuance date of the Resaca preferred stock, which we refer to as the initial issuance period, any issuances of Resaca common stock or common stock equivalents at a per share price less than the market price of $0.7941 per share (which does not reflect the Reverse Stock Split), rather than the then conversion price in effect, shall result in a weighed average conversion price adjustment. In addition, for the first nine (9) months following the initial issuance date of the Resaca preferred stock, without the prior written consent of a majority of the holders of Resaca preferred stock, Resaca may not issue Resaca common stock (excluding issuances of excluded securities) for which it receives proceeds (net of offering expenses, discounts and fees) of more than $50 million at a gross price per share below the market price of $0.7941 per share (which does not reflect the Reverse Stock Split). Excluded securities include Resaca common stock issued or deemed issued in connection with (i) an approved employee stock plan, (ii) upon conversion of the Resaca preferred stock, (iii) in connection with the merger or the Reverse Stock Split, (iv) pursuant to a bona fide firm commitment underwritten public offering with a nationally recognized underwriter which generates gross proceeds to Resaca in excess of $50 million (other than an "at-the-market offering" or "equity lines"), (v) in connection with any strategic acquisition or transaction whether through an acquisition of stock or a merger of any business, assets or technologies the primary purpose of which is not to raise equity capital, (vi) upon conversion, exercise or exchange of options or convertible securities or vesting of restricted stock and (vii) in connection with any stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization or similar transaction by Resaca. Resaca common stock issued in the offering or, if the offering is not completed, any subsequent offering completed for the sole purpose of facilitating and consummating the merger and related transactions, which we refer to as a subsequent offering, shall not be an excluded security.

        Additional Resaca Preferred Stock; Variable Securities; Dilutive Issuances.    For so long as any Resaca preferred stock is outstanding, Resaca will not, without the prior written consent of the holders of a majority of the outstanding Resaca preferred stock, issue any Resaca preferred stock, and Resaca shall not issue any other securities that would cause a breach or default under the Resaca Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations other than those issued pursuant to the merger, the offering or the Reverse Stock Split. In addition, Resaca should not, in any manner, issue or sell (i) any rights, warrants or options to subscribe for or purchase Resaca common stock or (ii) any stock or securities directly or indirectly convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for Resaca common stock at a conversion, exchange or exercise price which varies or may vary after issuance with the market price of Resaca common stock.

I-139


Table of Contents

        Mandatory Redemption at Maturity.    If any Resaca preferred stock remains outstanding on October 6, 2012, Resaca shall redeem such Resaca preferred stock for a conversion amount in cash equal to the sum of the Additional Amount and the stated value of $1,000. "Additional Amount" equals the product of (x) the result of the formula: (dividend rate)(N/360) and (y) the stated value of $1,000.

        Redemption Option Upon Triggering Event.    After a Triggering Event, each holder shall have the right to require us to redeem all or a portion of such holder's Resaca preferred stock equal to the greater of (i) 125% of the conversion amount and (ii) the product of (A) the conversion rate equal to conversion amount/conversion price in effect at such time and (B) the greater of the closing sale price of the Resaca common stock on the trading day immediately preceding such Triggering Event, the closing sale price of the Resaca common stock on the day immediately following such Triggering Event and the closing sale price of the Resaca common stock on the date the holder delivers the notice of redemption at the holder's option.

        A "Triggering Event" occurs if:

        Notwithstanding, neither the merger, nor the offering or any subsequent offering (as defined in "—Adjustments to Conversion Price" on page I-139), nor the Reverse Stock Split, regardless of when the merger, the offering or any subsequent offering occurs shall be considered a Triggering Event.

        Change of Control Redemption Right.    At any time during the period beginning after a holder's receipt of notice of a change of control (as defined below) and ending on the date that is 20 trading days after the consummation of such change of control, such eligible holder may require us to redeem all or any portion of such holder's Resaca preferred stock at a premium.

I-140


Table of Contents

        A change of control means any fundamental transaction (as defined below) other than (i) any reorganization, recapitalization or reclassification of the Resaca common stock in which holders of Resaca's voting power immediately prior to such reorganization, recapitalization or reclassification continue after such reorganization, recapitalization or reclassification to hold publicly traded securities and, directly or indirectly, the voting power of the surviving entity or entities necessary to elect a majority of the members of the Resaca board of directors (or their equivalent if other than a corporation) of such entity or entities, or (ii) pursuant to a migratory merger effected solely for the purpose of changing the jurisdiction of Resaca's incorporation. A fundamental transaction generally includes the following, whether in one or more related transactions: mergers or consolidations involving us, sales, assignments or transfers of all or substantially all of Resaca's assets, certain tender offers and business combinations in which another person acquires more than 50% of Resaca voting stock, reclassifications of Resaca common stock and any person becoming the beneficial owner of 50% of Resaca voting stock.

        Other Rights.    Resaca shall not enter into or be party to a fundamental transaction unless (i) the successor entity assumes in writing all of Resaca's obligations under the Resaca Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations and the other transaction documents pursuant to written agreements in form and substance satisfactory to a majority of the holders of the outstanding Resaca preferred stock and approved by such holders prior to such fundamental transaction and (ii) the successor entity is a publicly traded corporation whose common stock is quoted on or listed for trading on the American Stock Exchange, New York Stock Exchange, the Nasdaq Global Select Market, the Nasdaq Global Market or the Nasdaq Capital Market.

        If at any time Resaca grants, issues or sells any options, convertible securities or rights to purchase stock, warrants, securities or other property pro rata to the record holders of any class of Resaca common stock, but excluding issuances of Resaca Common Stock in the offering or any subsequent offering (as defined in "—Adjustments to Conversion Price" on page I-139), which we collectively refer to as purchase rights, the holders will be entitled to acquire the aggregate purchase rights which such holder could have acquired if such holder had held the number of shares of Resaca common stock acquirable upon complete conversion of the Resaca preferred stock immediately before the date on which a record is taken for the grant, issuance or sale of such purchase rights, or, if no such record is taken, the date as of which the record holders of Resaca common stock are to be determined for the grant, issue or sale of such purchase rights.

        Following the occurrence of an asset sale (as defined below), a holder may require Resaca to redeem, with the available asset sale proceeds (as defined below), all or any portion of the Resaca preferred stock held by such holder. For so long as any Resaca preferred stock is outstanding, Resaca shall not, and shall not permit any of its subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, consummate any asset sale unless Resaca receives consideration at the time of the asset sale at least equal to the fair market value of the assets or capital stock and all warrants, options or other rights to acquire capital stock issued or sold or otherwise disposed of.

        An asset sale means, in one transaction or a series of related transactions, (i) the sale, lease, conveyance or other disposition of any assets or rights other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, or (ii) the sale of equity interests in any of Resaca subsidiaries, which sale, lease conveyance or other disposition of assets or rights or sale of equity interests generates proceeds to us equal to or greater than $15,000,000; provided, however, that neither (A) a sale, lease, conveyance or other disposition of the Cano Rich Valley Properties nor (B) any sale, lease, conveyance or other disposition of the Barnett Shale natural gas properties, which we refer to as Barnett Shale Properties, made solely for the purpose of contributing such Cano Barnett Shale Properties to a joint venture entity in which Resaca, or one of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, owns any equity interests thereof, shall be considered an asset Sale for purposes of the Resaca Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations.

I-141


Table of Contents

        Available asset sale proceeds means, for any asset sales, the difference between (i) the cash proceeds generated in such asset sale and (ii) the outstanding principal amount (including any interest thereon) of the senior debt; provided, however, that in the event of any asset sale relating to the Cano Barnett Shale Properties the available asset sale proceeds shall be equal to the difference between (A) the cash proceeds generated in such asset sale and (B) $15,000,000.

        Voting Rights.    Subject to certain limitations on conversion, each holder shall be entitled to the whole number of votes equal to the lesser of (i) the number of shares of Resaca common stock into which the holder's Resaca preferred stock would be convertible and shall otherwise have voting rights and powers equal to the voting rights and powers of the Resaca common stock and (ii) the number of shares of Resaca common stock into which such holder's Resaca preferred stock would be convertible if the conversion price on the record date for the vote or consent of shareholders is deemed to be the market price of $0.7941 (which does not reflect the Reverse Stock Split), as adjusted for any stock dividend, stock split, stock combination, reclassification or similar transaction. The Resaca preferred stock shall vote as a class with the holders of Resaca common stock as if they were a single class of securities upon any matter submitted to a vote of shareholders, except those matters required by law or by the terms of the Resaca Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations to be submitted to a class vote of the holders of Resaca preferred stock, in which case the holders of Resaca preferred stock only shall vote as a separate class.

        Liquidation Preference.    In the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, distribution of assets (other than the payment of dividends), dissolution or winding-up of Resaca's business, the Resaca preferred stock shall have preferential rights to holders of any of Resaca's capital stock of any class junior in rank to the Resaca preferred stock in respect of the preferences as to distributions and payments on the liquidation, dissolution and winding up of Resaca's business. All shares of Resaca common stock shall be of junior rank to all Resaca preferred stock.

        The Resaca preferred stock is entitled to a liquidation preference equal to the stated value of the Resaca preferred stock plus accrued dividends.

        Ranking; Issuances of Other Securities.    Without the prior express written consent of a majority of the holders of the outstanding Resaca preferred stock, Resaca shall not authorize or issue additional or other capital stock that is of senior or pari-passu rank to the Resaca preferred stock in respect of the preferences as to distributions and payments upon Resaca's voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the assets of which constitute all or substantially all of the assets of Resaca and Resaca subsidiary's business taken as a whole, in a single transaction or series of transactions. Resaca may issue other preferred stock that is junior in rank to the Resaca preferred stock, provided that the maturity date (or any other date requiring redemption or repayment of such preferred stock) of any such junior preferred stock is not on or before the 91st day following the maturity date October 6, 2012, unless extended.

        Issuances of Equity-Linked Securities.    For so long as any Resaca preferred stock is outstanding, Resaca will not, directly or indirectly, offer, sell, grant any option to purchase, or otherwise dispose of, any of Resaca indebtedness or indebtedness of Resaca subsidiaries that is, any time during its life and under any circumstances, convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for shares of Resaca common stock, options, convertible securities or other capital stock.

        Covenants.    The affirmative vote or the written consent of the holders of at least a majority of the aggregate shares of Resaca preferred stock then outstanding, voting together as a single class, will be required for Resaca to:

I-142


Table of Contents

        The issuance of shares of the Resaca preferred stock by Resaca's board of directors as described above may adversely affect the rights of the holders of Resaca common stock. For example, Resaca preferred stock issued by Resaca shall rank superior to the Resaca common stock as to dividend rights and liquidation preference, shall have preferred voting rights and is convertible into shares of Resaca common stock. Accordingly, the issuance of shares of Resaca preferred stock may discourage bids for Resaca common stock or may otherwise adversely affect the market price of Resaca common stock.


Anti-Takeover Law and Certain Charter and Bylaw Provisions

        Resaca's certificate of formation, bylaws and the TBOC contain certain provisions that could discourage potential takeover attempts and make it more difficult for Resaca shareholders to change management or receive a premium for their shares. For a description of such provisions please see "Comparison of Rights of Resaca Shareholders and Cano Stockholders" beginning on page I-145.


Limitation of Liability; Indemnification

        Resaca's charter documents contain certain provisions permitted under the TBOC relating to the liability of directors. These provisions eliminate a director's personal liability for monetary damages resulting from a breach of fiduciary duty, except that a director will be personally liable:

        These provisions do not limit or eliminate Resaca's rights or those of any shareholders to seek non-monetary relief, such as an injunction or rescission, in the event of a breach of a director's fiduciary duty. These provisions will not alter a director's liability under federal securities laws.

        Resaca's charter documents also provide that Resaca must indemnify its directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Texas law and also provide that it must advance expenses, as incurred, to its directors and officers in connection with a legal proceeding to the fullest extent permitted by Texas law, subject to very limited exceptions.

I-143


Table of Contents

        Resaca has or may enter into separate indemnification agreements with its directors and officers that may, in some cases, be broader than the specific indemnification provisions contained in its certificate of incorporation, bylaws or the TBOC. The indemnification agreements may require Resaca, among other things, to indemnify the officers and directors against certain liabilities, other than liabilities arising from willful misconduct, that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or officers. Resaca believes that these indemnification arrangements are necessary to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve as directors and officers.


Stock Exchanges

        Our common stock is listed on the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange under the symbols "RSOX" and "RSX," and following completion of the merger will be listed on the AIM under the symbol "RSOX" and has been approved for listing on the NYSE Amex upon notice of issuance under the symbol "RSOX." The last reported sale price of our common stock as reported on the AIM on May 28, 2010 was $0.62 per share.


Transfer Agent and Registrar

        Prior to the merger, the Transfer Agent and Registrar for the Resaca common stock is Computershare Investor Services (Jersey) Limited. Its phone number is +44 (0) 1534 825 292. Immediately following the merger, the Transfer Agent and Registrar for the Resaca common stock and the Resaca preferred stock will be Computershare Trust Company N.A. Its phone number is 800-962-4284.

I-144


Table of Contents


COMPARISON OF RIGHTS OF RESACA SHAREHOLDERS AND CANO STOCKHOLDERS

        The rights of Cano stockholders are governed by Cano's charter documents, each as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, and the laws of the State of Delaware. The rights of Resaca shareholders are governed by Resaca's charter documents, each as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, and the laws of the State of Texas. After the merger, the Cano stockholders will become shareholders of Resaca and accordingly their rights will be governed by Resaca's charter documents, each as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, and the laws of the State of Texas. While the rights and privileges of Cano stockholders are, in many instances, comparable to those of the shareholders of Resaca, there are some differences. The following is a summary of the material differences as of the date of this proxy statement between the rights of the Cano stockholders and the rights of Resaca shareholders. These differences arise from differences between the respective charters and bylaws of Cano and Resaca and the differences between the DGCL and TBOC. We have noted below also instances where the post-merger rights and privileges of shareholders of the combined company differ from the pre-merger rights and privileges of Resaca shareholders.

        The following discussion of these differences is only a summary of the material differences and does not purport to be a complete description of all the differences. Please consult the following references to the DGCL, TBOC and the respective charters and bylaws, each as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, of Cano and Resaca for a more complete understanding of these differences.

Resaca
  Cano
Capital Stock:
Pre-Merger:    
Resaca is authorized to issue:   Cano is authorized to issue:

•       230,000,000 shares of Resaca common stock, of which 96,947,494 were issued and outstanding as of May 28, 2010. Following the Resaca shareholder approval of the Reverse Stock Split, 19,389,499 shares of Resaca common stock will be issued and outstanding immediately prior to the merger.

•       20,000,000 shares of Resaca preferred stock, of which none are issued and outstanding.

 

•       100,000,000 shares of Cano common stock, of which 45,571,897 were issued and outstanding as of May 28, 2010.

•       5,000,000 shares of Cano preferred stock, of which 28,125 were issued and outstanding as of May 28, 2010.

Post-Merger:    
Resaca will be authorized to issue:    

•       230,000,000 shares of Resaca common stock.

•       20,000,000 shares of Resaca preferred stock of which 49,116 shares will be designated Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.

   

I-145


Table of Contents

Dividends and Repurchases of Shares:
Pre-Merger:    

•       TBOC § 21.302 provides that the board of directors of a corporation may authorize and the corporation may make distributions, however such distributions are subject to TBOC § 21.303 which provides that a distribution may not be made (1) if the distribution would violate the corporation's charter or (2) if the corporation would be insolvent after the distribution or if the distribution would exceed the distribution limit, unless the distribution is made in compliance with Chapter 11 of the TBOC. Under TBOC§ 21.301, "distribution limit" means the net assets of a corporation if the distribution is a purchase or redemption of any of its own shares by the corporation to (1) eliminate fractional shares, (2) collect or compromise indebtedness owed by or to the corporation, (3) pay dissenting shareholders entitled to payment for their shares under the TBOC or (4) effect the purchase or redemption of redeemable shares in accordance with the TBOC.

 

•       DGCL § 170(a) permits the directors of a corporation to declare and pay dividends out of surplus or, if there is no surplus, out of net profits for the fiscal year as long as the amount of capital of the corporation after the declaration and payment of the dividend is not less than the aggregate amount of the capital represented by the issued and outstanding stock of all classes having preference upon the distribution of assets. In addition, the DGCL § 160(a)(1) generally provides that a corporation may redeem or repurchase its shares only if the capital of the corporation is not impaired and such redemption or repurchase would not impair the capital of the corporation, except that a corporation may redeem out of its shares in which it would be entitled to any distribution.

•       Under Cano's charter, holders of Cano's common stock are entitled to receive dividends ratably when dividends are declared by the board of directors out of funds legally available for payment of dividends.

•       TBOC § 21.304 provides that a distribution may by made by a corporation for any outstanding redeemable shares subject to redemption. In the event that less than all of the outstanding redeemable shares of a corporation subject to redemption are to be redeemed, the shares to be redeemed shall be selected for redemption (1) in accordance with the corporation's charter; or (2) ratably or by lot in the manner prescribed by the resolution of the corporation's board of directors, if the charter does not specify how shares are to be selected for redemption.

 

•       Under Cano's Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, which we refer to as the Cano Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations, holders of Cano preferred stock are entitled to receive dividends, which are cumulative, in the amount of $78.75 per year or $150 per year if any triggering events have occurred, including suspension of trading of Cano common stock for ten consecutive days, failure to pay a Cano preferred stockholder any amount when and as due or any event of default occurring with respect to any indebtedness, and until such triggering events are cured.

I-146


Table of Contents

Post-Merger:    

•       Same as above. However, under the Resaca Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations, holders of Resaca preferred stock are entitled to receive dividends, which are cumulative, in the amount of $78.75 per year or $150 per year if any triggering events have occurred, including suspension of trading of Cano common stock for ten consecutive days, failure to pay a Cano preferred stockholder any amount when and as due or any event of default occurring with respect to any indebtedness, and until such triggering events are cured.

   
Preemptive Rights:
Pre-Merger    

•       Texas law does not require shareholders to have preemptive rights, and Resaca's common shareholders do not possess preemptive rights under the terms of the Resaca charter.

 

•       Delaware law does not require stockholders to have preemptive rights, and Cano's common stockholders do not possess preemptive rights. Cano's preferred stockholders do possess those preemptive rights set forth in the Cano Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations.

Post-Merger    

•       Same as above. However, the Resaca preferred shareholders will possess certain preemptive rights as set forth in the Resaca Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations.

   

I-147


Table of Contents

Number and Term of Directors:
Pre-Merger:    

•       TBOC § 21.403(b) permits the charter or bylaws of a corporation to govern the number of directors.

•       Resaca's bylaws provide that the number of directors shall be fixed from time to time exclusively by the board of directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the Whole Board. "Whole Board" means that total number of the authorized directors whether or not there exist any vacancies in previously authorized directorships.

•       There are currently five directors serving on Resaca's board of directors. Resaca's directors are divided into three classes, designated Class I, Class II and Class III (which at all times shall be nearly equal in number as possible) with the term of office of the Class I directors to expire at Resaca's 2012 annual meeting of shareholders, the term of office of the Class II directors to expire at Resaca's 2010 annual meeting of shareholders and the term of office of the Class III directors to expire at Resaca's 2011 annual meeting of shareholders, with each director to hold office until his or her successor shall have been duly elected and qualified.

 

•       DGCL § 141(b) permits the charter or bylaws of a corporation to govern the number of directors. However, if the charter fixes the number of directors, such number may not be changed without amending the charter.

•       Cano's bylaws provide that the number of directors shall be established by resolution of the board of directors. Currently, there are eight directors on the Cano board.

Post-Merger:    

•       The procedure for electing directors will remain the same. However, there will be seven directors on the Resaca board.

   
Shareholder Action by Written Consent:

•       Under TBOC §§ 6.201(b) and 6.202(b), any action required to be taken at an annual or special meeting of shareholders may be taken without a meeting if all shareholders entitled to vote with respect to the action consent in writing to such action or, if the corporation's charter so provides, if a consent in writing is signed by holders of shares having not less than the minimum number of votes necessary to take such action at a meeting at which holders of all shares entitled to vote on the action were present and voted.

•       Resaca's charter does not allow shareholders to act by written consent.

 

•       Under DGCL § 228, any action by a corporation's stockholders must be taken at a meeting of such stockholders, unless a consent in writing setting forth the action so taken is signed by the stockholders having not less than the minimum number of votes necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote on the action were present and voted.

•       Cano's bylaws provide that Cano stockholders may act by written consent.

I-148


Table of Contents

Removal of Directors:

•       Under TBOC § 21.409, except as otherwise provided by the charter or bylaws, at any meeting of shareholders called expressly for that purpose, the holders of a majority of the shares then entitled to vote at an election of directors may vote to remove any director or the entire board of directors, with or without cause. However, in the event the directors serve staggered terms, a director may not be removed except for cause unless the charter provides otherwise.

•       Resaca's charter establishes a classified board of directors and disallows cumulative voting.

•       Resaca's charter provides that any director or the entire Board of Directors may be removed from office at any time, but only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least fifty percent (50%) of the voting power of all of the then-outstanding shares of capital stock of the Corporation then entitled to vote at an election of directors, voting together as a single class.

 

•       Under DGCL § 141(k), a majority of stockholders of a Delaware corporation then entitled to vote may remove a director with or without cause, unless the directors are classified and elected for staggered terms (in which case directors may be removed only for cause) and unless the corporation allows for cumulative voting

•       Cano's charter does not establish a classified board of directors, and Cano's charter disallows cumulative voting. Therefore, Cano's directors may be removed by a majority of Cano's stockholders at any time, with or without cause.

Voting Rights:
Pre-Merger:    

•       Each common shareholder is entitled to one vote per share. However, the common shareholder is not entitled to vote on any amendment that relates solely to the terms of an outstanding series of preferred stock. There are no cumulative voting rights.

 

•       Each common stockholder is entitled to one vote per share.

•       Each preferred stockholder is entitled to the whole number of votes equal to the lesser of (i) the number of shares of Cano common stock into which such holder's shares of Cano preferred stock would be convertible based on the conversion price of $5.75 per share (subject to adjustment pursuant to the Cano Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations) on the record date for the vote or consent of Cano stockholders, and (ii) the number of shares of Cano common stock into which such holder's shares of Cano preferred stock would be convertible if the conversion price on the record date for the vote or consent of stockholders is deemed to be $4.79 per share, as adjusted for any stock dividend, stock split, stock combination, reclassification or similar transaction.

I-149


Table of Contents

Post-Merger:    

•       The rights of the common shareholder shall remain the same.

•       Each preferred shareholder is entitled to the whole number of votes equal to the lesser of (i) the number of shares of Resaca common stock into which such holder's shares of Resaca preferred stock would be convertible based on the conversion price of $4.963 (as adjusted for the Reverse Stock Split) per share (subject to adjustment pursuant to the Resaca Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations) on the record date for the vote or consent of Resaca shareholders, and (ii) the number of shares of Resaca common stock into which such holder's shares of Resaca preferred stock would be convertible if the conversion price on the record date for the vote or consent of shareholders is deemed to be $3.9705 (as adjusted for the Reverse Stock Split) per share, as adjusted for any stock dividend, stock split, stock combination, reclassification or similar transaction.

   
Adjournment of Shareholder Meetings:

•       If a quorum is not represented at a shareholder meeting, the chairman of the meeting may adjourn the meeting to another place, if any, date or time.

 

•       If a quorum is not represented at a stockholder meeting, the chairman of the meeting may adjourn the meeting to another place, if any, date or time.

Proxies:

•       At any meeting of Resaca shareholders, every shareholder entitled to vote may vote in person or by proxy authorized by an instrument in writing or by a transmission permitted by law filed in accordance with the procedure established for the meeting.

 

•       At any meeting of Cano stockholders, every stockholder entitled to vote may vote in person or by proxy authorized by an instrument in writing or by a transmission permitted by law filed in accordance with the procedure established for the meeting.

Director Nominations:

•       Resaca's bylaws establish procedures that shareholders must follow to nominate persons for election to Resaca's board of directors at an annual meeting of shareholders. The nomination for election to the board of directors may be made pursuant to Resaca's notice with respect to such annual meeting of shareholders, by or at the direction of the board of directors or by any shareholder of record who was a shareholder of record at the time of the giving of the notice who was entitled to vote at the meeting and who has complied with the notice procedures.

 

•       Cano's bylaws establish procedures that stockholders must follow to nominate persons for election to Cano's board of directors at an annual meeting of stockholders. The nomination for election to the board of directors may be made pursuant to Cano's proxy materials, by or at the direction of the board of directors, or by any stockholder of record of Cano who was entitled to vote at such meeting and who has complied with the notice procedures.

I-150


Table of Contents

Election of Directors:

•       TBOC § 21.405 provides that the holders of shares entitled to vote in the election of directors shall elect directors at the annual meeting. A corporation's charter may provide that the holders of a class or series of shares are entitled to elect one or more directors of the corporation.

•       Resaca's bylaws entitle its shareholders to elect directors by the vote of a plurality of the votes cast. Resaca's charter prohibits cumulative voting.

 

•       DGCL § 216(3) provides that, unless the charter or the bylaws specify otherwise, a corporation's directors are elected by a plurality of the votes of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. Under DGCL § 214, a corporation's charter may provide that stockholders of a corporation can elect directors by cumulative voting. DGCL § 141(d) permits, through implementation by the charter, the initial bylaws or bylaws adopted by vote of the stockholders, a classified board of directors, divided into as many as three classes.

•       Neither Cano's charter nor Cano's bylaws opt-out of the plurality voting standard. Cano's charter provides that cumulative voting is not permitted, and Cano's charter does not provide for a classified board.

Vacancies on the Board of Directors:

•       Under TBOC § 21.410(b), the shareholders at an annual or special meeting or a majority of the remaining directors (even if less than a quorum) may fill any vacancy occurring in the board of directors. Under TBOC § 21.410(d), a directorship to be filled by reason of an increase in the number of directors may be filled by the shareholders (at an annual or special meeting) or by the board of directors for a term of office continuing only until the next election of one or more directors by the shareholders. However, the board of directors may not fill more than two such vacancies during the period between any two successive annual meetings of shareholders.

•       Resaca's bylaws provide that a majority of directors then in office may choose a successor.

 

•       Under DGCL § 223(a)(1), unless otherwise provided in a corporation's charter or bylaws, a majority of the directors then in office (even though less than a quorum) or by a sole remaining director may fill vacancies and newly-created directorships resulting from an increase in the authorized number of directors elected by all the stockholders having the right to vote as a single class. However, DGCL § 223(c) provides that if the directors then in office constitute less than a majority of the whole board, the Court of Chancery may, upon application of any stockholder or stockholders holding at least 10% of the total number of shares at the time outstanding and entitled to vote for directors, order an election to be held to fill any such vacancy or newly created directorship.

•       Cano's charter provides that any vacancy in its board of directors, however caused or created, may be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors, though less than a quorum of the board of directors. Cano's bylaws similarly provide that any vacancy in the board of directors is to be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors of the Cano board, but the bylaws specify that this right is subject to the rights of any holders of preferred stock then outstanding.

I-151


Table of Contents

Special Meeting of Shareholders:

•       Under TBOC § 21.352, special meetings of the Resaca shareholders may be called by the Resaca board of directors, the President, others permitted by the charter or bylaws or holders of at least 10% of the shares entitled to vote at the meeting (provided that the charter may specify that this percentage is greater than 10% but not greater than 50%).

•       Resaca's bylaws provide that special meetings of the Resaca shareholders may be called at any time by the Board acting pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the Whole Board.

 

•       Under DGCL § 211(d), a special meeting of a corporation's stockholders may be called by the board or by any other person authorized by the corporation's certificate of incorporation or bylaws.

•       Cano's bylaws allow special meetings to be called at any time pursuant to a resolution of the board of directors adopted by a majority of the whole board, by the Chief Executive Officer of Cano or by the record holder or holders of at least 10% of all shares entitled to vote at the meeting. Subject to applicable law, the board may postpone or reschedule any previously scheduled special meeting.


 

 

 

I-152


Table of Contents

Charter Amendments:

•       Under TBOC §§ 21.054 and 21.364, after a corporation has received payment for its capital stock, amendments to a corporation's charter must be approved by a resolution of the board of directors directing that the proposed amendment be submitted to a vote of the shareholders at a meeting and by the affirmative vote of a majority of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on the amendment.

•       If an amendment would (1) increase or decrease the number of authorized shares of such class, (2) increase or decrease the par value of the shares of such class (including eliminating the par value of the shares of such class), (3) effect an exchange, reclassification or cancellation of all or part of the shares of the class or series, (4) effect an exchange or create a right of exchange of all or part of the shares of another class or series into the shares of the class or series, (5) change the designations, preferences, limitations or relative rights of the shares of the class or series, (6) change the shares of the class or series (with or without par value) into the same or a different number of shares (with or without part value) of the same class or series or another class or series, (7) create a new class or series of shares with rights and preferences equal, prior or superior to the shares of the class or series, (8) increase the rights and preferences of a class or series with rights or preferences later or inferior to the shares of the class or series in such a manner that the rights or preferences will be equal, prior or superior to the shares of the class or series, (9) divide the shares of the class into series and set and determine the designation of the series and the variations in the relative rights and preferences between the shares of the series, (10) limit or deny existing preemptive or cumulative voting rights of the shares of the class or series, (11) cancel or otherwise affect the dividends on the shares of the class or series that have accrued but have not been declared or (12) include or delete from the charter provisions required or permitted to be included in the charter of a close corporation, then two-thirds of the shares of that class also must approve the amendment.

 

•       Under DGCL § 242(b), amendments to a corporation's charter must be approved by a resolution of the board of directors declaring the advisability of the amendment, and by the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote.

•       If an amendment would increase or decrease the number of authorized shares of such class, increase or decrease the par value of the shares of such class or alter or change the powers, preferences or other special rights of a class of outstanding shares so as to affect the class adversely, then a majority of shares of that class also must approve the amendment. The DGCL also permits a corporation to make provision in its charter requiring a greater proportion of voting power to approve a specified amendment.

•       Cano's charter does not contain any special provisions regarding approval of amendments to the Cano charter.

•       The Cano Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations provides that the affirmative vote or the written consent of the holders of at least a majority of the aggregate shares of Cano preferred stock then outstanding, voting together as a separate class, regardless of whether any such action shall be by means of an amendment to the Cano charter or by merger, consolidation or otherwise, shall be required to amend the Cano charter.


 

 

 

I-153


Table of Contents

•       The TBOC also permits a corporation to make provision in its charter requiring a lower proportion of voting power to approve a specified amendment, but not lower than a majority of the class.

•       Resaca's charter does not provide that a greater proportion of voting power is required to approve any amendment to its charter. Thus, the Resaca charter may be amended as provided under the TBOC (i.e. upon the affirmative vote of 50% of the outstanding common shares).

   

Bylaw Amendments:

•       Under TBOC § 21.057(c), the board of directors of may alter, amend or repeal the bylaws without shareholder approval, although bylaws made by the board of directors, and the power conferred upon the board of directors to amend such bylaws, may be altered or repealed by a two-thirds vote by the shareholders.

•       Resaca's charter provides that the board of directors is expressly empowered to adopt, amend, or repeal the Bylaws. Any adoption, amendment or repeal of the Bylaws by the Board shall require the approval or a majority of the Whole Board. Shareholders shall also have power to adopt, amend or repeal the Bylaws, provided that the affirmative vote of 50% of the holders entitled to vote shall be required.

 

•       Under DGCL § 109, the power to adopt, amend or repeal a corporation's bylaws resides with the stockholders entitled to vote on the bylaws, and with the directors of such corporation if such power is conferred upon the board of directors by the charter.

•       Cano's charter provides that Cano's bylaws may be amended by the board of directors of Cano, subject to repeal or change by a majority vote of Cano's stockholders.

•       The Cano Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations provides that the affirmative vote or the written consent of the holders of at least a majority of the aggregate shares of Cano preferred stock then outstanding, voting together as a separate class, regardless of whether any such action shall be by means of an amendment to the Cano charter or by merger, consolidation or otherwise, shall be required to amend the Cano bylaws.


Inspection of Books and Records:

•       Under TBOC § 21.218(b), subject to the governing documents of a corporation, any shareholder who holds at least 5% of all of the outstanding shares of a corporation or that has held its shares for at least six months is entitled, upon written demand stating a proper purpose, to examine at a reasonable time, the relevant books and records of account, minutes and share transfer records of the corporation.

 

•       Under DGCL § 220(b), any stockholder of a Delaware corporation making a proper written demand may inspect the stock ledger, the list of stockholders and any other corporate books and records for any purpose reasonably related to the stockholder's interest as a stockholder.


 

 

 

I-154


Table of Contents

Merger:

•       TBOC § 21.457(a) and (c) require the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the shares entitled to vote to approve a merger, or if any class of shares is entitled to vote as a class on the approval of a merger, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the shares in each such class entitled to vote as a class and the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the shares otherwise entitled to vote. The same voting requirements apply for share exchanges or conversions. TBOC § 21.459 does not require a vote by the shareholders on a plan of merger, unless such a vote is required by the corporation's charter, if: (1) the corporation is the sole surviving corporation in the merger; (2) the charter of the surviving corporation will not differ from its charter before the merger; (3) each shareholder of the surviving corporation whose shares were outstanding immediately before the effective date of the merger will hold the same number of shares, with identical designations, preferences, limitations and relative rights immediately after the merger; (4) the sum of the voting power of the number of voting shares outstanding immediately after the merger and the voting power of securities that may be acquired on the conversion or exercise of securities issued under the merger does not exceed by more than 20% the voting power of the total number of voting shares of the corporation that are outstanding immediately before the merger; and (5) the sum of the number of participating shares that are outstanding immediately after the merger and the number of participating shares that may be acquired on the conversion or exercise of securities issued under the merger does not exceed by more than 20% the total number of participating shares of the corporation that are outstanding immediately before the merger.

 

•       DGCL § 251(b), (c), and (f) require approval of the board of directors and the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on a merger in order to effect that merger. Unless required by its charter, no stockholder vote is required of a corporation surviving a merger if (1) such corporation's charter is not amended by the merger; (2) each share of such corporation will be an identical share of the surviving corporation after the merger; and (3) either no shares are to be issued by the surviving corporation or the number of shares to be issued in the merger does not exceed 20% of such corporation's outstanding common shares immediately before the effective date of the merger.

•       Cano's charter does not contain any super-majority voting requirements governing mergers.

•       The Cano Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations provides that the affirmative vote or the written consent of the holders of at least a majority of the aggregate shares of Cano preferred stock then outstanding, voting together as a separate class, regardless of whether any such action shall be by means of an amendment to the Cano charter or by merger, consolidation or otherwise, shall be required to approve a merger.


 

 

 

I-155


Table of Contents

Voting on Sale of Assets:

•       Under TBOC §§ 21.455(d) and 21.457(a) and (c), there is a requirement for the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the shares entitled to vote to approve the sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of all or substantially all the corporation's property and assets if other than in the usual and regular course of business, or if any class of shares is entitled to vote as a class on the approval of the sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of all or substantially all the corporation's assets, the vote required for approval of such transaction is the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the shares in each such class and the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the shares otherwise entitled to vote. TBOC § 21.457(a) and (c) do not require shareholder approval of a sale of assets in the usual and regular course of business unless otherwise specified in the charter. Under TBOC § 21.451(2)(A)-(B), a "sale of all or substantially all of the assets" means the sale, lease, exchange, or other disposition, other than a pledge, mortgage, deed of trust, or trust indenture unless otherwise provided by the charter, of all or substantially all of the property and assets of a domestic corporation that is not made in the usual and regular course of the corporation's business without regard to whether the disposition is made with the goodwill of the business. The term does not include a transaction that results in the corporation, directly or indirectly: (1) continuing to engage in one or more businesses or (2) applying a portion of the consideration received in connection with the transaction to the conduct of a business in which it engages after the transaction.

 

•       Under DGCL § 271(a), a corporation may not sell all or substantially all of its assets unless the proposed sale is authorized by a majority of the outstanding shares of voting stock of the corporation.

•       Cano's charter does not provide for a different vote than that required by Delaware law.

•       The Cano Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations provides that the affirmative vote or the written consent of the holders of at least a majority of the aggregate shares of Cano preferred stock then outstanding, voting together as a separate class, regardless of whether any such action shall be by means of an amendment to the Cano charter or by merger, consolidation or otherwise, shall be required to approve the sale by Cano of all or substantially all of the assets of Cano.


 

 

 

I-156


Table of Contents

Anti-Takeover Provisions:

•       TBOC §§ 21.601(1), 21.602, 21.604 and 21.606 provide that a Texas corporation with 100 or more shareholders, a Texas corporation with a class or series of the corporation's voting shares registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or a Texas corporation with a class or series of the corporation's voting shares qualified for trading in a national market system may not engage, directly or indirectly, in certain business combinations, including mergers and asset sales, with a person, or an affiliate or associate of such person, who is an "affiliated shareholder" (generally defined as the holder of 20% or more of the corporation's voting shares) for a period of three years from the date such person became an affiliated shareholder unless:
1.  the business combination or purchase or acquisition of shares made by the affiliated shareholder was approved by the board of directors of the corporation before the affiliated shareholder became an affiliated shareholder, or
2.  the business combination was approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting shares of the corporation not beneficially owned by the affiliated shareholder or an affiliate or associate of the affiliated shareholder, at a meeting of shareholders called for that purpose (and not by written consent), not less than six months after the affiliated shareholder became an affiliated shareholder.

 

•       DGCL § 203 generally prohibits business combinations, including mergers, sales and leases of assets, issuances of securities and similar transactions by a corporation or a subsidiary with an interested stockholder (defined as including the beneficial owner of 15% or more of a corporation's voting shares), within three years after the person or entity becomes an interested stockholder, unless:
1.  the board of directors has approved, before the acquisition date, either the business combination or the transaction that resulted in the person becoming an interested stockholder;
2.  upon completion of the transaction that resulted in the person becoming an interested stockholder, the person owns at least 85% of the corporation's voting shares, excluding shares owned by directors who are officers and shares owned by employee stock plans in which participants do not have the right to determine confidentially whether shares will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or
3.  at the time the person or entity becomes an interested stockholder or after the person or entity becomes an interested stockholder, the business combination is approved by the board of directors and authorized by the vote of at least 662/3% of the outstanding voting shares not owned by the interested stockholder at an annual or special meeting of stockholders and not by written consent.

•       Under TBOC § 21.607, a Texas corporation may elect to opt out of these provisions. Resaca has not made such an election.

   

 

 

 

I-157


Table of Contents

•       Under U.K. law, if (i) at any time when the Corporation is not subject to the U.K. City Code on Takeovers and Mergers or any successor or other regime (whether statutory or non-statutory) governing the conduct of takeovers and mergers in the United Kingdom (any of such being the "Takeover Regime"); (ii) any person (together with any persons held to be acting in concert with him, her or it, as defined in the Takeover Regime) acquires any interest in shares in the Corporation and as a result he, she or it (whether or not with the other persons) would (in the opinion of the Board of Directors) have been obliged under the Takeover Regime to extend an offer (a "Mandatory Offer") to the holders of any other securities in the Corporation had the Takeover Regime applied to the Corporation (such person or persons who would from time to time have been required to have made such an offer being the "Mandatory Offeror(s)"); and (iii) the Mandatory Offeror(s) fail(s) to make such an offer on terms no less favorable (in the opinion of the Board of Directors) to the other holders of securities than he/she/it/they would have been obliged to offer under the provisions of the Takeover Regime had it applied (a "Compliant Offer") within twenty-one (21) days following the date on which the obligation would have arisen, the Board of Directors shall be entitled, but not obliged, to suspend with immediate effect, with notification thereof being given to the Mandatory Offeror(s) or (if different) the registered holders of the shares in the Corporation in which they have an interest, all voting rights, all rights to receive notices of and attend meetings of the Corporation and all rights to receive dividends attributable to the shares in the Corporation in which the Board of Directors considers the Mandatory Offeror(s) from time to time to have an interest. Any such suspension may, at the discretion of the Board of Directors extend for any period during which the obligation to make a Mandatory Offer would have continued to exist under the Takeover Regime unless and until a Compliant Offer is made. The foregoing provisions shall only apply as long as the shares of capital stock of the Resaca are admitted to trading on AIM or are listed on the Official List.

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I-158


Table of Contents

Appraisal Rights:

•       Under TBOC § 10.354(a), a shareholder generally has the right to dissent from any merger to which the corporation is a party, from any sale of all or substantially all assets of the corporation, or from any plan of exchange and to receive fair value for his or her shares. However, dissenters' rights are not available with respect to a plan of merger in which there is a single surviving corporation, or with respect to any plan of exchange, if (i) the shares held by the shareholder are part of a class or series, shares of which are listed on a national securities exchange, listed on the NASDAQ stock market, designated as a national market security on an interdealer quotation system by the National Association of Security Dealers, Inc. or held of record by not less than 2,000 holders on the record date fixed to determine the shareholders entitled to vote on the plan of merger or the plan of exchange, (ii) the shareholder is not required by the terms of the plan of merger or plan of exchange to accept for the shareholder's shares any consideration that is different than the consideration (other than cash in lieu of fractional shares) to be provided to any other holder of shares of the same class or series held by such shareholder, and (iii) the shareholder is not required by the terms of the plan of merger or plan of exchange to accept for his or her shares any consideration other than (a) shares of a corporation that, immediately after the effective time of the merger or exchange, will be part of a class or series of shares that are (1) listed, or authorized for listing upon official notice of issuance, on a national securities exchange, (2) approved for quotation on the NASDAQ National Market System, or (3) held of record by not less than 2,000 holders, and (b) cash in lieu of fractional shares otherwise entitled to be received.

 

•       Under DGCL § 262, stockholders have appraisal rights when they hold their shares in the corporation through the effective date of a merger or consolidation, have not voted in favor of the merger or consolidation, and the corporation's shares are not listed on a national securities exchange or held by more than 2,000 holders.

•       Cano's common stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights; however, Cano's preferred stockholders are entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the merger.

•       For more information see Annex E.

•       Resaca common shareholders are not entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the merger.

   

 

 

 

I-159


Table of Contents

Limitation of Liability of Directors:

•       Under TBOC §§ 8.003 and 8.102, a corporation's charter may eliminate all monetary liability of each director to the corporation or its shareholders for acts or omissions in the director's capacity as a director other than conduct specifically excluded from protection. Under TBOC §§ 8.101 and 8.102(b)(3), Texas law does not permit any limitation of liability of a director found liable for:
1.  willful or intentional misconduct in the performance of the person's duty to the enterprise;
2.  breaching the duty of loyalty to the corporation; or
3.  an act or omission not committed in good faith that constitutes a breach of the duty owed to the corporation.

•       Resaca's charter provides for the limitation of liability of its directors, except for liability for (i) any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to Resaca or its shareholders, (ii) an act or omission not in good faith that constitutes a breach of duty of the director or involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit, regardless of whether the benefit resulted from an action taken within the scope of the director's duties, or (iv) an act or omission for which liability of a director is expressly provided by an applicable statute.

 

•       DGCL § 102(b)(7) provides that a corporation, in its charter, may limit or eliminate a director's personal liability for monetary damages to the corporation or its stockholders for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability for:
1.  any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to such corporation or its stockholders;
2.  acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
3.  willful or negligent violation of provisions of the DGCL governing unlawful payment of dividends and unlawful stock purchases or redemptions;
4.  for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit; or
5.  any act or omission occurring prior to the adoption of such a provision in the charter.

•       Cano's charter provides that a director shall not be liable to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, subject to the same limitations as set forth in DGCL § 102(b)(7). Cano's charter also provides that no director shall be personally liable for any injury to person or property arising out of a tort committed by an employee of Cano unless such director was personally involved in the situation giving rise to the injury or unless such director committed a criminal offense.


 

 

 

I-160


Table of Contents

Indemnification of Officers and Directors and Advancement of Expenses:

•       TBOC § 8.102 permits a corporation to indemnify any person who has been or is threatened to be made a party to a legal proceeding because he is or was a director of the corporation, or because he served at the request of the corporation as a principal of another business or employee benefit plan, against any judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses actually incurred by him in connection with the proceeding. However, under TBOC § 8.101, a corporation may not indemnify a director in reliance on this statute unless the director (1) conducted himself in good faith, (2) reasonably believed that his conduct was in the best interests of the corporation or, in the case of action not taken in his official capacity, was not opposed to the best interests of corporation, and (3) in the case of a criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful.

•       TBOC § 8.051(a) provides that a corporation is required to indemnify any director or officer of the corporation who has been or is threatened to be made a party to a legal proceeding by reason of his service to the corporation if the director or officer is successful on the merits or otherwise in the defense of such proceeding. In addition, under TBOC § 8.151(b), a corporation may purchase and maintain on behalf of its directors and officers insurance with respect to any liability asserted against or incurred by such persons, whether or not the corporation would have the power under applicable law to indemnify such persons.

 

•       Cano's charter provides that a director shall not be liable to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except to the extent such exculpation is not permitted under the DGCL. Cano's charter also provides that no director shall be personally liable for any injury to person or property arising out of a tort committed by an employee of Cano unless such director was personally involved in the situation giving rise to the injury or unless such director committed a criminal offense.

•       Cano's bylaws similarly provide for indemnification of directors and officers, to the fullest extent provided under Delaware law, for expense, liability and loss (including attorneys' fees) incurred in connection with a suit brought by reason of the fact the director or officer was serving as a director or officer. Cano's bylaws also provide for the payment of expenses (including attorneys' fees) incurred by a director or officer in defending such a suit.

•       DGCL § 145(b) permits a corporation to indemnify its officers, directors and other agents as long as (1) the director acted in good faith; (2) the director acted in a manner the director reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the corporation or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation; and (3) the director has not been adjudged liable for the claim, issue or matter (unless and only to the extent that the Delaware Court of Chancery or court in which the action or suit was brought determines upon application that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all the circumstances of the case, the director is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnification for expenses).


 

 

 

I-161


Table of Contents

     

•       TBOC § 8.102(b) permits a corporation to indemnify a director for reasonable expenses actually incurred by the director in connection with the proceeding (and not for a judgment, penalty, fine, or excise or similar tax) if the director has not been found liable to the corporation or is found to have received an improper personal benefit. TBOC § 8.104 permits a corporation to pay reasonable expenses of a director in advance of the final disposition of a proceeding for which indemnification may be provided on the condition that the corporation first receives (1) a written affirmation by the director of his good faith belief that he has met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification, and (2) a written undertaking by or on behalf of the director that he will repay such expenses if it is ultimately determined that he is not entitled to be indemnified. TBOC § 8.105 allows a corporation to indemnify and advance expenses to its officers, employees and other agents to the same extent that it allows a corporation to indemnify and advance expenses to directors.

•       Resaca's charter documents authorize indemnification of officers, directors and others to the fullest extent authorized or permitted by applicable law.

 

•       DGCL § 145(c) provides that a corporation is required to indemnify any director or officer of the corporation who has been or is threatened to be made a party to a legal proceeding by reason of his service to the corporation if the director or officer is successful on the merits or otherwise in the defense of such proceeding. In addition, under DGCL § 145(g), a corporation may purchase and maintain on behalf of its directors and officers insurance with respect to any liability asserted against or incurred by such persons, whether or not the corporation would have the power under applicable law to indemnify such persons.

•       DGCL § 145(e) permits a corporation to pay expenses (including attorneys' fees) of a director or officer incurred in defending any civil, criminal, administrative or other investigative action, suit or proceeding in advance of a final disposition of a proceeding if the director or officer provides the corporation with an undertaking to repay such expenses if it is ultimately determined that the director or officer is not entitled to be indemnified. A corporation also is permitted to pay expenses incurred by former directors and officers and other employees and agents upon such terms and conditions, if any, as the corporation deems appropriate.

I-162


Table of Contents


REVERSE STOCK SPLIT

        Resaca is asking its shareholders at its annual meeting to approve an amendment to its charter to effect a reverse split of the outstanding shares of Resaca common stock by a ratio of one-for-five immediately prior to the Merger and the Share Issuances such that for every five pre-split shares of Resaca common stock held by a Resaca shareholder, such shareholder would be entitled to one post-split share of Resaca common stock, fractional shares being rounded down to the nearest full post-split share. Should the proposal be adopted by the Resaca shareholders, each shareholder's percentage ownership interest in Resaca and proportional voting power will remain unchanged immediately prior to the Merger and the Share Issuances, except for minor differences resulting from adjustments for fractional shares. The rights and privileges of the holders of shares of Resaca common stock will be substantially unaffected by the adoption of the proposal.


Purpose

        Resaca is proposing the Reverse Stock Split to increase the stock price for shares of Resaca common stock immediately prior to the merger so that the minimum listing requirements of the NYSE Amex can be satisfied. The NYSE Amex requires all new securities listing on its market to have a minimum market price of $2.00 per share. The effect of this Reverse Stock Split will be to increase the stock price in the same proportion as the number of shares is adjusted downward, resulting in a five times increase in the market price for Resaca common stock on the AIM on the day prior to the completion of the merger and the listing of Resaca common stock on the NYSE Amex. It is a condition precedent to the merger that Resaca common stock be listed on the NYSE Amex.


Principal Effects of the Reverse Stock Split

        If approved by the Resaca shareholders and implemented by the Resaca board of directors, the Reverse Stock Split would occur immediately prior to the merger for all Resaca common stock and the ratio of post-split shares for pre-split shares would be the same for all of such shares of Resaca common stock. The Reverse Stock Split would affect all Resaca shareholders uniformly and would not affect any shareholder's percentage ownership interest in Resaca immediately prior to the merger. In addition, the Reverse Stock Split would not affect any Resaca shareholder's proportionate voting rights. Each share of Resaca common stock outstanding after the Reverse Stock Split would be entitled to one vote and would remain fully paid and non-assessable.

        The principal effects of the Reverse Stock Split would be that:

        No scrip or fractional certificates will be issued in connection with the Reverse Stock Split. Instead, any fractional share that results from the Reverse Stock Split will be exchanged for cash in an amount equal to the closing price on the effective date of the merger.

        A reduction in the number of outstanding shares of Resaca common stock could result in decreased liquidity in the combined company's common stock. In addition, the Reverse Stock Split could result in some Resaca shareholders owning "odd lots" of less than one hundred (100) shares of the Resaca common stock on a post-split basis. Odd lots may be more difficult to sell, or may require

I-163


Table of Contents


greater transaction costs per share to sell than do "board lots" of even multiples of one hundred (100) shares.

        The amendment to the Resaca charter is included as Annex C to this proxy statement.


Effect on Authorized Shares

        The number of authorized shares of Resaca common stock would not be affected by the Reverse Stock Split. Resaca would continue to have 230 million shares of Resaca common stock and 20 million shares of undesignated Resaca preferred stock immediately following the Reverse Stock Split; provided, however, that 49,116 shares of such stock shall be designated as Series A Convertible Preferred Stock in connection with the merger. Based on shares outstanding as of the record date of May 21, 2010, and following the merger and approval of the Incentive Plan Amendment, approximately 4,090,037 shares of Resaca's common stock will be available for future issuance under the Incentive Plan. Resaca's board of directors may issue capital stock for proper corporate purposes that may be identified in the future, such as to raise capital through the issuance of securities, to make acquisitions using securities as consideration, to issue securities in connection with strategic relationships with other companies, and to adopt additional employee benefit plans or reserve additional shares for issuance under such plans. Resaca has no current plans to issue additional shares of capital stock at this time, other than as already disclosed in this registration statement.


Potential Anti-Takeover Effect

        Although the increased proportion of unissued authorized shares to issued shares could, under certain circumstances, have an anti-takeover effect (for example, by permitting issuances that would dilute the stock ownership of a person seeking to effect a change in the composition of the Resaca board of directors or contemplating a tender offer or other transaction for the combination of Resaca with another company), the Reverse Stock Split proposal is not being proposed in response to any effort of which we are aware to accumulate Resaca's common stock or obtain control of Resaca, other than the merger, nor is it part of a plan by management to recommend a series of similar amendments to Resaca board of directors and shareholders. Other than the Reverse Stock Split proposal, the Resaca board does not currently contemplate recommending the adoption of any other amendments to Resaca's charter that could be construed to affect the ability of third parties to take over or change the control of Resaca.


Effect on Accounting Matters

        The Reverse Stock Split would not affect the par value of Resaca's common stock. As a result, on the effective date of the Reverse Stock Split, the stated capital on Resaca's balance sheet attributable to Resaca's common stock would be reduced in proportion to the ratio of the reverse split. The per share net income or loss and net book value of Resaca common stock would be increased because there would be fewer shares of Resaca common stock outstanding.


No Dissenter's Rights

        Under the TBOC, Resaca's shareholders are not entitled to dissenter's rights with respect to the Reverse Stock Split, and Resaca will not independently provide shareholders with any such right.


Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Reverse Stock Split

        The following is a summary of certain material United States federal income tax consequences of the Reverse Stock Split and does not purport to be a complete discussion of all of the possible federal income tax consequences of the Reverse Stock Split and is included for general information only. Further, it does not address any state, local or foreign income or other tax consequences. For example,

I-164


Table of Contents


the state and local tax consequences of the Reverse Stock Split may vary significantly as to each shareholder, depending upon the state in which he or she resides. Also, it does not address the tax consequences to holders that are subject to special tax rules, such as banks, insurance companies, regulated investment companies, personal holding companies, foreign entities, nonresident alien individuals, broker-dealers and tax-exempt entities. The discussion is based on the provisions of the United States federal income tax law as of the date hereof, which is subject to change retroactively as well as prospectively. This summary also assumes that the pre-split shares were, and the post-split shares would be, held as a "capital asset," as defined in the Internal Revenue Code (i.e., generally, property held for investment). The tax treatment of a Resaca shareholder may vary depending upon the particular facts and circumstances of such shareholder.

        No gain or loss should be recognized by a Resaca shareholder upon such shareholder's exchange of pre-split shares for post-split shares pursuant to the Reverse Stock Split. The aggregate tax basis of the post-split shares received in the Reverse Stock Split should be the same as the Resaca shareholder's aggregate tax basis in the pre-split shares exchanged therefor. The Resaca shareholder's holding period for the post-split shares should include the period during which the shareholder held the pre-split shares surrendered in the Reverse Stock Split.

        OUR VIEW REGARDING THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT IS NOT BINDING ON THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE OR THE COURTS.

I-165


Table of Contents


INCENTIVE PLAN AMENDMENT

        The Resaca board of directors adopted, subject to shareholder approval and contingent upon approval and consummation of the merger, the Incentive Plan Amendment pursuant to a Unanimous Written Consent of the Board of Directors dated April 1, 2010. The Incentive Plan Amendment amends the Incentive Plan (as amended herein referred to as the "Amended Incentive Plan") and includes (i) an increase in the number of shares of Resaca common stock (after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split) authorized, subject to any shares previously granted, for grants and awards under the Amended Incentive Plan by 4,000,000 shares from 1,845,175 to 5,845,175 shares; and (ii) the prohibition of the repricing of any stock option or stock appreciation right granted under the Incentive Plan.

        The Amended Incentive Plan provides for the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and other awards that may be paid in cash or Resaca common stock. The Amended Incentive Plan provides Resaca with flexibility to adapt the compensation of key employees to a changing business environment, after giving due consideration to competitive conditions and the impact of federal tax laws. Based on the amount of historical grants and potential future grants, Resaca believes the Incentive Plan Amendment, to be implemented simultaneously with the merger and following the Reverse Stock Split, is necessary in order to reserve for issuance under the Amended Incentive Plan an adequate number of shares of Resaca common stock to (i) implement the conversion of all outstanding Cano stock options into options to purchase Resaca common stock issued under the Amended Incentive Plan and (ii) fund potential future awards under the Amended Incentive Plan following the completion of the merger. The board of directors of Resaca believes that 4,000,000 additional shares of Resaca common stock, which number of shares has been adjusted for the Reverse Stock Split, represents a reasonable amount of potential equity dilution and allows the combined company to continue awarding stock options, restricted stock and other equity incentive awards, which are an important component of the combined company's overall compensation program. As of May 28, 2010 and assuming that the approval of the Reverse Stock Split had occurred on May 28, 2010, only 563,715 shares of Resaca common stock would have been available for the issuance of awards under the Incentive Plan. Approximately 473,678 shares of Resaca common stock must be available under the Incentive Plan for the conversion of the Cano stock options. Following the conversion of the Cano stock options, the Amended Incentive Plan would only have 90,037 shares available for issuance but for the Incentive Plan Amendment. Following the merger, the Reverse Stock Split and the Incentive Plan Amendment, 4,090,037 shares of Resaca common stock will be available for awards under the Incentive Plan. Resaca believes that prohibiting the repricing of any stock option or stock appreciation right granted under the Incentive Plan aligns the Amended Incentive Plan with our historical granting practices. The Resaca board of directors believes that the Incentive Plan Amendment is in the best interests of Resaca and its shareholders.


Description of the Incentive Plan Amendment

        On April 1, 2010, the Resaca board of directors approved, (i) subject to Resaca shareholder approval, simultaneously with the merger and following the Reverse Stock Split, an increase of 4,000,000 shares of Resaca common stock that may be issued under the Incentive Plan from 1,845,175 to 5,845,175 shares and (ii) the prohibition of the repricing of any awards granted under the Incentive Plan.

        The following summary describes the material features of the Incentive Plan as amended by the Incentive Plan Amendment. The summary is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the Incentive Plan, which is included as Annex I to this proxy statement, and the Incentive Plan Amendment, which is included as Annex J to this proxy statement.

I-166


Table of Contents


Description of Amended Incentive Plan

        The purpose of the Amended Incentive Plan is to foster and promote the long-term financial success of Resaca and to increase Resaca shareholder value by attracting, motivating and retaining key employees, consultants and outside directors and providing such participants in the Amended Incentive Plan with a program for obtaining an ownership interest in Resaca that links and aligns their personal interests with those of Resaca shareholders, thus enabling such participants to share in the long-term growth and success of Resaca. To accomplish these goals, the Amended Incentive Plan permits the granting of incentive stock options, non statutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, and other stock-based awards, some of which may require the satisfaction of performance-based criteria in order to be payable to participants. The Amended Incentive Plan is an important component of the total compensation package offered to employees and outside directors, reflecting the importance that Resaca places on motivating and rewarding superior results with long-term, performance-based incentives. The following is a summary of the principal features of the Amended Incentive Plan and its operation.

        Administration.    The Amended Incentive Plan is administered by a committee (the "Committee") appointed by the board of directors. The Committee is composed of at least two directors who qualify as "outside directors" under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, and/or as "non-employee directors" under Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the US Exchange Act. Subject to the terms of the Amended Incentive Plan, the Committee has the power to select the persons eligible to receive awards under the Amended Incentive Plan, the type and amount of incentive awards to be awarded, and the terms and conditions of such awards. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Committee may delegate its authority under the Amended Incentive Plan described in the preceding sentence to officers or other employees of Resaca. The Committee also has the authority to interpret the Amended Incentive Plan and establish, amend or waive rules necessary or appropriate for the administration of the Amended Incentive Plan.

        Eligibility.    Any employee or consultant of Resaca or a subsidiary of Resaca or an outside director of Resaca who, in the opinion of the Committee, is in a position to contribute to the growth, development or financial success of Resaca is eligible to participate in the Amended Incentive Plan. As of May 28, 2010, approximately 108 employees (29 of whom are employed by Resaca, 59 of whom are employed by Cano plus an additional 20 employees are co-employed by Torch and Resaca), 0 consultants and 5 outside directors are eligible to participate in the Amended Incentive Plan. In any calendar year, no covered employee described in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code or applicable U.S. Treasury regulations may be granted (in the case of stock options and stock appreciation rights), or have vest (in the case of restricted stock or other stock-based awards), awards relating to more than 553,552 shares of Resaca common stock (after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split) outstanding at the time such awards are granted, and the maximum aggregate cash payout with respect to incentive awards paid in cash to such covered employees may not exceed $2,000,000.

        Resaca common stock subject to the Amended Incentive Plan.    The maximum number of shares of Resaca common stock that may be delivered pursuant to awards granted under the Amended Incentive Plan is 5,845,175. Any shares subject to an award under the Amended Incentive Plan that are forfeited or terminated, expire unexercised, lapse or are otherwise cancelled in a manner such that the shares covered by such award are not issued may again be used for awards under the Amended Incentive Plan. All of the Resaca common stock subject to the Amended Incentive Plan may be issued upon exercise of incentive stock options. The maximum number of shares deliverable pursuant to awards granted under the Amended Incentive Plan is subject to adjustment by the Committee in the event of certain dilutive changes in the number of outstanding shares. Under the Amended Incentive Plan, Resaca may issue authorized but unissued shares, treasury shares, or shares purchased by Resaca on

I-167


Table of Contents


the open market or otherwise. The number of shares of Resaca common stock available for future awards is reduced by the net number of shares issued pursuant to an award.

        Transferability.    Rights under any award may not be transferred except by will or the laws of descent and distribution or a qualified domestic relations order. However, the Committee may, in its discretion, authorize in the applicable award agreement the transfer, without consideration, of all or a portion of a nonstatutory stock option by a participant in the plan to family members, trusts and entities owned by family members.

        Amendment of the Amended Incentive Plan.    The Resaca board of directors has the power and authority to terminate or amend the Amended Incentive Plan at any time; provided, however, the board of directors may not, without the approval of Resaca shareholders:

        Change in control.    Unless provided otherwise in the applicable award agreement, in the event of a change in control, all outstanding awards shall become 100% vested, free of all restrictions, immediately and fully exercisable, and deemed earned in full and payable as of the day immediately preceding the change in control. A "change in control" means the occurrence of any one or more of the following events:

The Resaca board of directors may determine that any of the events described above will not constitute a change in control.

I-168


Table of Contents

        Award agreements and term.    All awards under the Amended Incentive Plan will be authorized by the Committee and evidenced by an award agreement setting forth the type of incentive being granted, the vesting schedule, and other terms and conditions of exercisability. No incentive stock options may be exercisable for more than ten years from the date of grant, or, in the case of an incentive stock option granted to an employee who owns or is deemed to own more than 10% of the Resaca common stock, five years from the date of grant. In no event, however, may incentive stock options be granted after the expiration of ten years from the effective date of the Amended Incentive Plan.

        Stock options.    A grant of a stock option entitles a participant to purchase from Resaca a specified number of Resaca common stock at a specified price per share. In the discretion of the Committee, stock options may be granted as non statutory stock options or incentive stock options, but incentive stock options may only be granted to employees of Resaca or a subsidiary. The aggregate fair market value of the Resaca common stock with respect to which incentive stock options become first exercisable by any participant during any calendar year cannot exceed $100,000.

        The Committee may fix any price as the exercise price at which a share of Resaca common stock may be purchased under a stock option, provided that such exercise price must be at least equal to the fair market value of the Resaca common stock on the date of grant, or, if an incentive stock option is granted to an employee who owns or is deemed to own more than 10% of the Resaca common stock, 110 percent of the fair market value of the Resaca common stock on the date of grant. The exercise price for Resaca common stock acquired on exercise of a stock option must be paid in cash, or, if approved by the Committee, delivery of Resaca common stock with a fair market value equal to the exercise price of the stock option, the withholding of shares that would otherwise be issuable upon exercise, participation in a broker-assisted "cashless exercise" arrangement, or payment of any other form of consideration acceptable to the Committee.

        Stock appreciation rights ("SARs").    The grant of a SAR provides the holder with the right to receive a payment in Resaca common stock equal to the excess of the fair market value of a specified number of Resaca common stock on the date the SAR is exercised over a SAR price specified in the applicable award agreement. The SAR price specified in an award agreement must be equal to or greater than the fair market value of Resaca common stock on the date of the grant of the SAR.

        Restricted stock.    A grant of restricted stock is an award of Resaca common stock subject to restrictions or limitations set forth in the Amended Incentive Plan and in the related award agreement. The award agreement for restricted stock will specify the time or times within which such award may be subject to forfeiture and any performance goals which must be met in order to remove any restrictions on such award. Except for limitations on transfer or limitations set forth in the applicable award agreement, holders of restricted stock shall have all of the rights of a Resaca shareholder, including the right to vote the shares, and, if provided in the applicable award agreement, the right to receive any dividends thereon.

        Other awards.    The Committee may grant to any participant other forms of awards payable in Resaca common stock or cash. The terms and conditions of such other form of award shall be specified by the applicable award agreement. Such other awards may be granted for no cash consideration, other than services already rendered, or for such other consideration as may be specified by the award agreement.

        Performance-based awards.    Awards may be granted under the Amended Incentive Plan that are subject to the attainment of pre-established performance goals over a specified performance period. Performance-based awards may be payable in stock or cash. The award agreement for a performance-based award will specify the performance period, the performance goals to be achieved during the performance period, and the maximum or minimum settlement values. Performance goals set by the Committee may relate to profits, return measures, cash flows, earnings and other objective performance

I-169


Table of Contents


criteria set forth in the Amended Incentive Plan that the Committee believes to be relevant to Resaca's business.

        Termination of employment, death, disability and retirement.    Unless otherwise provided in an award agreement, upon the termination of a participant's employment the non-vested portions of all outstanding awards will terminate immediately. Subject to different provisions in an award agreement, the period during which vested awards may be exercised following a termination of employment are described below. If a participant's employment is terminated for any reason other than as a result of death, disability, retirement or for cause, the vested portion of such award is exercisable for the lesser of the expiration date set forth in the applicable award agreement or 90 days after the date of termination of employment. In the event of the termination of participant's employment for cause, all vested awards immediately expire. Upon a participant's retirement, any vested award shall expire on the earlier of the expiration date set forth in the award agreement for such award or one (1) year after the date of retirement (three months in the case of incentive stock options). Upon the death or disability of a participant, any vested award shall expire on the earlier of the expiration date set forth in the award agreement or the first anniversary date of the participant's death or disability.

        Repricing.    No stock option or SAR granted to a covered employee under the Amended Incentive Plan may be repriced unless approved in advance by Resaca's shareholders.

        Plan Benefits.    Future benefits under the Amended Incentive Plan are not currently determinable. Our management has a financial interest in this proposal because they are potentially eligible for awards under the Amended Incentive Plan. The following table indicates shares (under grants of restricted shares and options) awarded under the Amended Incentive Plan during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 to the named executive officers, to all executive officers as a group, the non-employee directors as a group and to all employees (excluding executive officers) as a group:

 
  Shares Awarded in Fiscal 2009  
Name and Position
  Dollar
Value(1)
  Number of
Shares
 

J.P. Bryan, Chairman of the Board

  $ 618,999     230,647  

John J. Lendrum, III, Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

  $ 2,475,995     922,587  

Chris B. Work, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  $ 1,237,999     461,294  

Dennis Hammond, President and Chief Operating Officer(2)

  $ 3,953,727     2,306,468  

Randy Ziebarth, Vice President—Operations

  $ 1,237,999     461,294  

Mary Lou Fry, Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary

  $ 1,237,999     461,294  

Michael J. Ricketts, Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer(3)

  $      

Robert Porter, Vice President of Engineering(4)

  $      

Phillip B. Feiner, Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary(3)

             

All executive officers (7 persons)

  $ 10,638,918     4,797,455  

All directors, excluding Messrs. Bryan and Lendrum (3 persons)(5)

  $ 1,582,803     784,200  

All employees, excluding executive officers

  $      

(1)
The dollar value is based on the grant date fair value of the awards computed in accordance with ASC 718.

(2)
Mr. Hammond's award included 922,587 shares of restricted stock and 1,383,881 options to purchase shares.

(3)
It has been determined that Messrs. Ricketts and Feiner would have been named executive officers of the combined company as of June 30, 2009, assuming the merger had been consummated.

I-170


Table of Contents

(4)
Mr. Porter did not receive any amount of restricted stock or stock option awards in fiscal 2009.

(5)
Includes Mr. Plato, who will not be a director upon effectiveness of the merger but was a director on June 30, 2009.


Federal Income Tax Consequences

        The following is a general summary as of the date hereof of the U.S. federal income tax consequences associated with the grant of awards under the Amended Incentive Plan. The federal tax laws may change and the federal, state and local tax consequences for any participant will depend upon his or her individual circumstances. Also, this information may not be applicable to employees of foreign subsidiaries or to participants who are not residents of the United States. Participants have been, and are, encouraged to seek the advice of a qualified tax advisor regarding the tax consequences of participation in the Amended Incentive Plan.

        Nonstatutory stock options.    A participant receiving a nonstatutory stock option that has been issued with an exercise price not less than the fair market value of the Resaca common stock on the grant date will not recognize income, and Resaca will not be allowed a deduction, at the time such an option is granted. When a participant exercises a nonstatutory stock option, the difference between the option price and any higher market value of the stock on the date of exercise will be ordinary income to the participant and will be claimed as a deduction for federal income tax purposes by Resaca. When a participant disposes of shares acquired by the exercise of the option, any amount received in excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise will be treated as short-term or long-term capital gain, depending upon whether the participant held the shares for more than one year following the exercise of the option. If the amount received is less than the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise, the loss will be treated as short-term or long-term capital loss, depending upon whether the participant held the shares for more than one year following the exercise of the option.

        Incentive stock options.    Incentive stock options granted under the Amended Incentive Plan are intended to meet the definitional requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code for "incentive stock options." A participant receiving a grant of incentive stock options will not recognize income and Resaca will not be allowed a deduction at the time such an option is granted. When a participant exercises an incentive stock option while employed by Resaca or its subsidiary or within the three month (one year for disability) period after termination of employment, no ordinary income will be recognized by the participant at that time (and no deduction will be allowed to Resaca), but the excess of the fair market value of the shares acquired by such exercise over the option price will be taken into account in determining the participant's alternative minimum taxable income for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax applicable to individuals. If the shares acquired upon exercise are not disposed of until more than two years after the date of grant and one year after the date of transfer of the shares to the participant (statutory holding periods), the excess of the sale proceeds over the aggregate option price of such shares will be long term capital gain, and Resaca will not be entitled to any federal income tax deduction. Except in the event of death, if the shares are disposed of prior to the expiration of the statutory holding periods (a "Disqualifying Disposition"), the excess of the fair market value of such shares at the time of exercise over the aggregate option price (but not more than the gain on the disposition if the disposition is a transaction on which a loss, if sustained, would be recognized) will be ordinary income at the time of such Disqualifying Disposition (and Resaca or its subsidiary will be entitled to a federal tax deduction in a like amount), and the balance of the gain, if any, will be capital gain (short-term or long-term depending upon whether the participant held the shares for more than one year following the exercise of the option). To the extent that the aggregate fair market value of stock (determined on the date of grant) with respect to which incentive options

I-171


Table of Contents


become exercisable for the first time during any calendar year exceeds $100,000, such excess options will be treated as nonstatutory options.

        Payment using shares.    If a participant pays the exercise price of a nonstatutory or incentive stock option with previously owned Resaca common stock and the transaction is not a Disqualifying Disposition, the shares received equal to the number of shares surrendered are treated as having been received in a tax free exchange. The shares received in excess of the number surrendered will not be taxable if an incentive stock option is being exercised, but will be taxable as ordinary income to the extent of their fair market value if a nonstatutory stock option is being exercised. The participant does not recognize income and Resaca receives no deduction as a result of the tax free portion of the exchange transaction. If the use of previously acquired incentive stock option shares to pay the exercise price of another incentive stock option constitutes a Disqualifying Disposition, the tax results are as described in the preceding paragraph. The income treatment will apply to the shares disposed of, but will not affect the favorable tax treatment of the shares received.

        Stock appreciation rights and restricted stock.    A participant receiving a grant of SARs or restricted stock under the Amended Incentive Plan will not recognize income, and Resaca will not be allowed a deduction, at the time such award is granted, unless the participant makes the election described below with respect to restricted stock. While an award remains unvested or otherwise subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, a participant will recognize compensation income equal to the amount of any dividends received and Resaca will be allowed a deduction in a like amount. When an award vests or otherwise ceases to be subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, the excess of the fair market value of the award on the date of vesting or the cessation of the substantial risk of forfeiture over the amount paid, if any, by the participant for the award will be ordinary income to the participant and will be claimed as a deduction for federal income tax purposes by Resaca. Upon disposition of the shares received, the gain or loss recognized by the participant will be treated as capital gain or loss, and the capital gain or loss will be short-term or long-term depending upon whether the participant held the shares for more than one year following the vesting or cessation of the substantial risk of forfeiture. However, by filing a Section 83(b) election with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service within 30 days after the date of grant of restricted stock, a participant's ordinary income and commencement of holding period and the deduction will be determined as of the date of grant. In such a case, the amount of ordinary income recognized by such a participant and deductible by Resaca will be equal to the excess of the fair market value of the award as of the date of grant over the amount paid, if any, by the participant for the award. If such election is made and a participant thereafter forfeits his or her award, no refund or deduction will be allowed for the amount previously included in such participant's income.

        Certain limitations on deductibility of executive compensation.    With certain exceptions, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code denies a deduction to a publicly held company for compensation paid to certain executive officers (either Resaca's principal executive officer or principal financial officer or an individual who is among the three highest compensated officers for the taxable year other than the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer) in excess of $1 million per executive per taxable year (including any deduction with respect to the exercise of a nonstatutory stock option or stock appreciation right, or the Disqualifying Disposition of shares purchased pursuant to an incentive stock option). One such exception applies to certain performance-based compensation, provided that such compensation has been approved by shareholders in a separate vote and certain other requirements are met. Resaca believes that the nonstatutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, and other performance-based awards granted under the Amended Incentive Plan qualify for the performance-based compensation exception to Section 162(m).

        Requirements regarding "deferred compensation."    Certain of the benefits under the Amended Incentive Plan may constitute "deferred compensation" within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, which governs the taxation of "nonqualified deferred compensation plans."

I-172


Table of Contents

Failure to comply with the requirements of the provisions of Section 409A regarding participant elections and the timing of payment distributions could result in the affected participants being required to recognize ordinary income for federal tax purposes earlier than expected, and to be subject to additional taxes and substantial penalties.

        ERISA.    The Amended Incentive Plan is not subject to any of the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"). The Amended Incentive Plan is not qualified under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Current Equity Compensation Plan Information

        The following table summarizes certain information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of June 30, 2009.

Plan Category
  Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options
(a)
  Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price of
Outstanding
Options(1)
(b)
  Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Vesting of
Outstanding
Restricted Shares
(c)
  Number Of
Securities
Remaining
Available for
Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities Reflected
in Column (a)
and (c))(2)
(d)
 

Equity Compensation Plans Approved By Security Holders

    1,756,787   $ 2.11     4,105,515     3,363,572  

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved By Security Holders

    NA     NA     NA     NA  

Total

    1,756,787   $ 2.10     4,105,515     3,363,572  

(1)
Weighted Average price of outstanding options as of June 30, 2009 is calculated as follows:

Grant Date
  Exercise Price (£)   Assumed Exchange Rate
as of June 30, 2009
  Exercise Price ($)  

07/17/2008

    £1.30   $ 1.65872   $ 2.16  

01/21/2009

    £0.23   $ 1.65872   $ 0.38  

Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share

              $ 2.11  
(2)
The Incentive Plan initially made 9,225,874 shares available for incentive compensation. As of June 30, 2009, 4,105,515 had been awarded in restricted stock (1,368,505 of which have vested as of the date of this proxy statement) and 1,756,787 had been awarded in stock options leaving 3,363,572 shares available in for future issuance.

I-173


Table of Contents


CHAPTER II—THE CANO SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

        The Cano board of directors is furnishing this proxy statement to its common and preferred stockholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Cano board of directors for use at the special meeting of its stockholders to be held on Wednesday, June 23, 2010. This proxy statement and form of proxy will be mailed to Cano common and preferred stockholders on or about June 2, 2010.


Time and Place

        The Cano special meeting is scheduled to be held at The Fort Worth Club located at 306 W. 7th Street, Suite 1100, Forth Worth, Texas 76102, on Wednesday June 23, 2010, at 10:00 a.m., Fort Worth, Texas time.


Purpose of the Special Stockholder Meeting

        The purpose of the Cano special meeting is as follows:

        2.     To consider and vote upon the Cano Series D Amendment;

Cano knows of no other matters to come before the special meeting. The first two proposals listed above relating to the merger and the Cano Series D Amendment are conditioned upon each other and the approval of each such proposal is required for completion of the merger.

        The members of the Cano board of directors, who voted, unanimously approved and adopted the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by it, declared its advisability and recommend that Cano stockholders vote "FOR" the adoption of the merger agreement, "FOR" the approval of the Cano Series D Amendment and "FOR" the approval of proposal 3 above. As described on pages I-108 to I-109, some Cano directors and executive officers will receive substantial financial benefits as well as other valuable consideration as a result of the merger.


Record Date and Outstanding Shares

        Only holders of record of Cano common stock at the close of business on May 21, 2010 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Cano special meeting. On the Cano record date, there were 45,570,147 shares of Cano common stock issued and outstanding held by approximately                holders of record. On the Cano record date, there were 27,963 shares of Cano preferred stock issued and outstanding held by approximately 16 holders of record. Each share of Cano common stock entitles the holder of that share to one vote on each matter submitted for stockholder approval. Each share of Cano common stock is entitled to one vote per share. Each share of Cano preferred stock is entitled to (i) one vote for per share for proposals 1 and 2; and (ii) approximately 173.913 votes per share (voting on an as-converted basis to Cano common stock) on proposal 3.

        As of April 5, 2010, the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Cano preferred stock had executed and delivered voting agreements, with irrevocable proxies, agreeing to vote in favor of the Cano Series D Amendment and the merger agreement and executed a written consent in lieu of special meeting, whereby those holders approved the Cano Series D Amendment and the adoption of the merger agreement.

II-1


Table of Contents


Share Ownership of Cano Directors, Executive Officers and Significant Stockholders

        At the close of business on the record date and excluding shares underlying options, Cano's directors and executive officers and their affiliates may be deemed to be the beneficial owners of, and have the power to vote, (i) 2,773,931 shares of Cano common stock, representing approximately 6.1% of the then outstanding shares of Cano common stock entitled to vote at the Cano special meeting, and (ii) 1,000 shares of Cano preferred stock, representing approximately 3.6% of the then outstanding shares of Cano preferred stock entitled to vote at the Cano special meeting. Cano believes that each of its directors and executive officers intends to vote "FOR" the adoption of the merger agreement and the Cano Series D Amendment.


Quorum and Vote Necessary to Approve Proposals

        Stockholders who hold a majority in voting power of the Cano common stock and Cano preferred stock issued and outstanding as of the close of business on the record date and who are entitled to vote must be present or represented by proxy in order to constitute a quorum to conduct business at the Cano special meeting. Broker non-votes will be not considered in determining the presence of a quorum at the Cano special meeting, because only non-routine voting matters are on the ballot.

        The affirmative vote of both (a) a majority of the outstanding shares of Cano common stock, voting as a separate class; and (b) a majority of the outstanding shares of Cano preferred stock, voting as a separate class, is required to adopt the merger agreement and to approve the Cano Series D Amendment. The approval of the adjournment of the meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of proposals 1 or 2 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares cast affirmatively or negatively of Cano common stock and Cano preferred stock, voting as a single class with the preferred stock voting on an as-converted basis to Cano common stock.

        As of April 5, 2010, the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Cano preferred stock had executed and delivered voting agreements, with irrevocable proxies, agreeing to vote in favor of the Cano Series D Amendment and the merger agreement and executed a written consent in lieu of special meeting, whereby the holders approved the Cano Series D Amendment and the adoption of the merger agreement. Holders of Cano preferred stock are entitled to appraisal rights under the DGCL in respect of the merger.


Voting of Proxies

        The proxy card will be sent to each Cano stockholder on or promptly after the record date. If you receive a proxy card, you may grant a proxy vote on the proposals by marking and signing your proxy card and returning it to Cano. If you hold your stock in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee, you should follow the instructions of the bank, broker or nominee when voting your shares. All shares of stock represented by properly executed proxies received prior to or at the Cano special meeting will be voted in accordance with the instructions indicated on such proxies. Proxies that have been revoked properly and on time will not be counted. If no instructions are indicated on a properly executed returned proxy, that proxy will be voted to approve the adoption of the merger agreement with respect to Resaca and Cano and to approve the other matters indicated on the proxy card.

        In accordance with the NYSE Amex rules, brokers, banks and nominees who hold shares in street name for customers may not exercise their voting discretion with respect to the adoption of the merger agreement or the approval of the Cano Series D Amendment. Thus, absent specific instructions from the beneficial owner of such shares, brokers, banks and nominees may not vote such shares with respect to the approval of those proposals. Broker non-votes will have the same effect as voting "AGAINST" the proposals to (i) adopt the merger agreement and approve of the merger or (ii) approve the Cano Series D Amendment. Abstentions will also have the same effect as voting "AGAINST" each of the foregoing Cano proposals. In addition, the broker non-votes effectively reduce the number of affirmative votes available to achieve a majority vote.

II-2


Table of Contents

        Except as noted above, a properly executed proxy marked "ABSTAIN," although counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum, will not be voted on any matters brought before the Cano stockholder meeting.

        Other Business.    The Cano board is not currently aware of any business to be acted upon at the special meeting other than the matters described herein. If, however, other matters are properly brought before the stockholder meeting, or any adjournments or postponements thereof, the persons appointed as proxies will have discretion to vote or act on those matters according to their judgment.


Revocation of Proxies

        You may revoke your proxy before it is voted by:

If you choose any of the first three methods, you must take the described action no later than the beginning of the annual meeting.

        If your shares are held in an account at a broker, bank or other nominee, you should contact your broker, bank or other nominee to change your vote.


Solicitation of Proxies

        In addition to solicitation by mail, we may make arrangements with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to send proxy materials to beneficial owners. The directors, officers and employees of Cano may solicit proxies by telephone, telecopy, fax, telegram or in person. These directors, officers and employees will receive no additional compensation for doing so. In addition, Cano has retained DF King and Co., Inc., a proxy solicitation firm, to assist with the solicitation of proxies. Cano estimates that it will pay to DF King and Co., Inc. a fee of not more than $20,000.

        To ensure sufficient representation at the Cano special meeting, we may request the return of proxy cards by telephone or in person. The extent to which this will be necessary depends entirely upon how promptly proxy cards are returned. You are urged to send in your proxies without delay.

        If the merger is consummated, Resaca will pay the cost of soliciting proxies, including the cost of preparing and mailing this proxy statement and the expenses incurred by brokerage houses, nominees and fiduciaries in forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners. In the merger agreement, we have agreed to split most of the costs of preparing and distributing this document, other than legal and investment banking fees, if the merger agreement is terminated.

        Holders of Cano common stock and Cano preferred stock should not send their stock certificates at this time. If the merger is completed, a separate letter of transmittal will be mailed to you, which will enable you to receive the appropriate consideration.

II-3


Table of Contents


CANO SPECIAL MEETING PROPOSALS

Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement
(Item 1 on Proxy Card)

        As discussed elsewhere in this proxy statement, Cano is asking its stockholders to adopt the merger agreement. Holders of Cano common stock and Cano preferred stock should read carefully this proxy statement in its entirety, including the annexes, for more detailed information concerning the merger agreement and the merger. In particular, holders of Cano common stock and preferred stock are directed to the merger agreement, a copy of which is Annex A to this proxy statement.

THE CANO BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ADOPTION OF
THE MERGER AGREEMENT (ITEM 1).

Proposal 2: Cano Series D Amendment
(Item 2 on Proxy Card)

        The following description summarizes the material provisions of the Cano Series D Amendment. The Cano Series D Amendment is included as Annex D to this proxy statement. We encourage you to read it carefully and in its entirety. The Cano Series D Amendment has been included as Annex D to provide you with information regarding its terms. It is not intended to provide any other factual information about Cano. Such information can be found elsewhere in this proxy statement. All capitalized terms in this section of the proxy statement, unless otherwise defined herein, have the meanings set forth in the Cano Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations.

General

        The Cano Series D Amendment adds a new section (23) to the Cano Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations which provides that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Transaction Documents, the holders of Cano preferred stock shall have none of the preferences, rights, privileges or powers of, or restrictions provided for the benefit of, the Cano preferred stock contained in the Transaction Documents relating to, arising out of or caused by the execution and delivery of the merger agreement and the consummation of the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement (including, without limitation, any rights to require Cano to redeem any shares of the Cano preferred stock or notice, voting or consent rights), except to receive the shares of Resaca preferred stock pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement and such other rights (including registration rights and preemptive rights having terms consistent with those presently contained in the Transaction Documents) not inconsistent with the foregoing as shall be reasonably acceptable to Cano, Resaca and the Required Holders.

        In addition, the Cano Series D Amendment provides that, in the event that (i) the merger agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms, (ii) the merger agreement is amended, modified or supplemented or any waiver is given by any party thereto that is individually or in the aggregate adverse to the interests of the holders of the Cano preferred stock without the prior written consent of a majority of the holders of the Cano preferred stock or (iii) Resaca fails to assume Cano's obligations under the Transaction Documents to the extent not otherwise eliminated pursuant to the Cano Series D Amendment with respect to the merger, the new section (23) created by the Cano Series D Amendment will be inoperative and of no force or effect.

        In order to provide the holders of the Cano preferred stock with certain registration rights and preemptive rights contained in the Transaction Documents, Resaca entered into the investors rights agreement with the holders of the Cano preferred stock which will be effective upon consummation of the merger. The investors rights agreement will supersede and replace certain of the Transaction Documents entered into among Cano and the holders of the Cano preferred stock, will provide the

II-4


Table of Contents


holders of Cano preferred stock with substantially similar rights as the Transaction Documents. A copy of the investors rights agreement is included as Annex F to this proxy statement.

Redemption Option Upon Triggering Event

        Section (3) of the Cano Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations provides that, after a Triggering Event, each holder of Cano preferred stock shall have the right to require Cano to redeem all or a portion of such holder's Cano preferred stock equal to the greater of (i) 125% of the Conversion Amount and (ii) the product of (A) the Conversion Rate in effect at such time and (B) the greater of the Closing Sale Price of the Cano common stock on the Trading Day immediately preceding such Triggering Event, the Closing Sale Price of the Cano common stock on the day immediately following such Triggering Event and the Closing Sale Price of the Cano common stock on the date the holder delivers the notice of redemption at the holder's option.

        A "Triggering Event" occurs if:

        The Cano Series D Amendment eliminates the rights of holders of Cano preferred stock to cause Cano to redeem any shares of Cano preferred stock pursuant to Section (3), resulting from the execution and delivery of the merger agreement or the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger.

Change of Control Redemption Right

        Section (8) of the Cano Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations provides that, at any time during the period beginning after the receipt by a holder of Cano preferred stock of a Change of Control Notice and ending on the date that is 20 Trading Days after the consummation of such Change of Control, such Eligible Holder may require Cano to redeem all or any portion of such holder's Cano preferred stock.

II-5


Table of Contents

        The Cano Series D Amendment eliminates the rights of holders of Cano preferred stock to cause Cano to redeem any shares of Cano preferred stock pursuant to Section (8), resulting from the execution and delivery of the merger agreement or the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger.

Other Rights

        Section (4) of the Cano Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations provides that Cano shall not enter into or be party to a Fundamental Transaction unless (i) the Successor Entity assumes in writing all of the obligations of Cano under the Cano Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations and the other Transaction Documents pursuant to written agreements in form and substance satisfactory to a majority of the holders of the outstanding Cano preferred stock and approved by such holders prior to such Fundamental Transaction and (ii) the Successor Entity is a publicly traded corporation whose common stock is quoted on or listed for trading on the Principal Market or an Eligible Market.

        The Cano Series D Amendment eliminates the rights of holders of Cano preferred stock to cause Cano or Resaca to take any of the actions required by Section (4), resulting from the execution and delivery of the merger agreement or the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger. Instead, holders of the Cano preferred stock, who do not seek appraisal, will receive shares of the Resaca preferred stock upon consummation of the merger and will also have the rights contained in the investors rights agreement.

        In addition, Section (4) of the Cano Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations provides that, following the occurrence of an Asset Sale, a holder of Cano preferred stock may require Cano to redeem, with the Available Asset Sale Proceeds, all or any portion of the Cano preferred stock held by such holder. For so long as any shares of Cano preferred stock are outstanding, Cano shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, consummate any Asset Sale unless Cano receives consideration at the time of the Asset Sale at least equal to the fair market value of the assets or Equity Interests issued or sold or otherwise disposed of.

        The Cano Series D Amendment eliminates the rights of holders of Cano preferred stock to cause Cano to redeem any shares of Cano preferred stock pursuant to Section (4), resulting from the execution and delivery of the merger agreement or the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger.

Covenants

        Section (12) of the Cano Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations provides that the affirmative vote or the written consent of the holders of at least a majority of the aggregate shares of Cano preferred stock then outstanding, voting together as a single class, will be required for Cano to:

II-6


Table of Contents

        The Cano Series D Amendment eliminates the voting and rights of holders of Cano preferred stock pursuant to Section (4), resulting from the execution and delivery of the merger agreement or the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger.

CANO'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT ITS STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE CANO SERIES D AMENDMENT (ITEM 2).

Proposal 3: Possible Meeting Adjournment or Postponement
(Item 3 on Proxy Card)

        The Cano annual meeting may be adjourned or postponed to another time or place to permit, among other things, further solicitation of proxies if necessary to obtain additional votes in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement or the Cano Series D Amendment.

THE CANO BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THIS ITEM (ITEM 3).

FUTURE CANO STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

        Cano's secretary must have received stockholders' proposals intended to be presented at Cano's next annual meeting, which has been indefinitely delayed pending the outcome of the results of this special meeting, at its principal executive office on or before August 10, 2009 to have been considered for inclusion in its proxy statement and form of proxy for the meeting. A stockholder proposal submitted outside of the processes established in Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act will be considered untimely if not so received by the close of business on the later of (i) the 90th day before the next annual meeting or (ii) the 10th day following the day of which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. Pursuant to Rule 14a-4(c)(1) under the Exchange Act, if Cano's secretary receives any stockholder proposal at Cano's principal executive office after such date, the proxies designated by Cano's board will have discretionary authority to vote on such proposal.


LEGAL MATTERS

        The validity of the Resaca common stock offered hereby will be passed upon by Haynes and Boone, LLP, Houston, Texas. In addition, Thompson & Knight LLP, Dallas, Texas has delivered an opinion to Cano as to certain tax matters.


EXPERTS

        The consolidated financial statements of Resaca as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2009 appearing in this proxy statement have been audited by UHY LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in their report thereon appearing elsewhere herein and are included in reliance upon such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

        The consolidated financial statements of Cano as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2009 appearing in this proxy statement, have been audited by Hein & Associates LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in their report thereon appearing elsewhere herein and are included in reliance upon such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

II-7


Table of Contents

        Certain information with respect to the oil and gas reserves associated with Resaca's oil and gas properties is derived from the reports of Haas Petroleum Engineering Services, Inc., an independent petroleum consulting firm, and has been included in this document upon the authority of said firms as experts with respect to the matters covered by such reports and in giving such reports. Certain information with respect to the oil and gas reserves associated with Cano's oil and gas properties is derived from the reports of Miller and Lents, Ltd., an independent petroleum consulting firm, and has been included in this document upon the authority of said firms as experts with respect to the matters covered by such reports and in giving such reports.


WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

        As an AIM-listed company, Resaca is not subject to the rules and regulations of the SEC. However, as a publicly-traded company, Cano is required to disclose certain information through filings with the SEC. Cano files annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any document Cano files at the SEC's public reference facilities of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference facilities. Cano's SEC filings are also available to the public at the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov. Copies of documents filed by Cano with the SEC are also available at the offices of The New York Stock Exchange, 20 Broad Street New York, New York 10005.

        Resaca maintains an Internet website at www.resacaexploitation.com. The information contained on, connected to or that can be accessed via its website is not part of this proxy statement.

        Cano maintains an Internet website at www.canopetro.com. The information contained on, connected to or that can be accessed via its website is not part of this proxy statement.

        Resaca has provided all of the information contained in this proxy statement with respect to Resaca and Cano has provided all of the information contained in this proxy statement with respect to Cano.

        If you own Cano common stock or preferred stock, please sign, date and promptly mail the enclosed proxy in the enclosed prepaid envelope. Prompt return of your proxy will help save additional solicitation expense.

II-8


Table of Contents


CHAPTER III—BUSINESS & FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF RESACA AND CANO

BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES

Our Business and Properties

        Resaca is an independent oil and gas exploitation company headquartered in Houston, Texas. We exploit known, mature, proven and probable low-risk oil and gas reserves, as opposed to generally pursuing exploratory operations. We utilize the existing technology to achieve secondary and tertiary hydrocarbon recovery. Resaca's activities are focused in the Permian Basin of West Texas and southeast New Mexico. In the merger with Cano, Resaca will acquire additional assets in Texas, New Mexico and Oklahoma.

        Resaca was formed in 2006 to exploit a number of oil and gas properties in the Permian Basin of the United States. Resaca was admitted to trading on the AIM on July 17, 2008.

        On September 29, 2009, Resaca and Cano entered into the merger agreement, pursuant to which Cano will merge with Merger Sub, a newly formed, wholly owned subsidiary of Resaca, with Cano thereupon becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of Resaca. In the merger, Cano common stockholders will receive 0.42 shares of Resaca common stock for each share of Cano common stock, and Cano preferred stockholders will receive one share of Resaca preferred stock for each share of Cano preferred stock.

        Due to Resaca's and Cano's complementary asset bases and similar strategic focus, we believe that the combined company will benefit from the following:

III-1


Table of Contents

The Combined Company

        At June 30, 2009, our estimated proved reserves had the following characteristics on a pro forma combined basis:

        Our estimated combined June 30, 2009 proved reserves of 63.3 MMBOE include 10.1 MMBOE of PDP, 8.0 MMBOE of PDNP, and 45.2 MMBOE of PUD. Reserves were estimated using NYMEX, crude oil and natural gas prices and production and development costs in effect on June 30, 2009. NYMEX crude oil price used in the estimation of Resaca's and Cano's reserves was $69.89 per barrel. NYMEX natural gas prices used in the estimation of Resaca's and Cano's reserves were $3.84 per MMBtu and $3.71 per MMBtu, respectively. The values reported may not necessarily reflect the fair market value of the reserves.

        Our properties are contained in eight primary field complexes and a group of minor fields. in mature oil and gas producing basins in Texas, New Mexico and Oklahoma and consist of approximately 75,000 gross and 73,000 net acres. At May 28, 2010, on a pro forma combined basis, we operated approximately 1,904 active wells, including 1,501 producing wells, 391 waterflood injection wells, and 12 salt water disposal wells. For the month ended April 30, 2010, on a pro forma combined basis, we produced an average of 1,923 net BOE per day from over 25 separate formations, which was composed of approximately 76% oil and approximately 24% natural gas. Nearly all of our production is from relatively shallow formations.

        Our exploitation plan involves the reactivation of shut-in wells, recompletion of currently producing wells, including refracturing implementation of new waterfloods, reactivation and optimization of existing waterfloods and an infill drilling program. We believe our properties contain many opportunities for the development of low risk oil and gas reserves and many of our properties are candidates for tertiary recovery by CO2 flooding based on reports and studies performed on these properties.

        For the year ended June 30, 2009, we generated pro forma combined operating revenues of $43.1 million and pro forma combined net income of $25.8 million. For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, we generated pro forma combined operating revenues of $28.7 million and pro forma combined net loss of $17.9 million. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, Resaca had revenues of approximately $14.6 million (excluding gains and losses on price risk management activities) and net income of approximately $2.7 million. For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Resaca had revenues of approximately $11.3 million (excluding gains and losses on price risk management activities) and a net loss of approximately $6.7 million. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, Cano had revenues of approximately $25.4 million and net income applicable to Cano common stock of approximately

III-2


Table of Contents

$7.9 million. For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano had revenues of approximately $16.4 million and net loss applicable to Cano common stock of approximately $13.1 million.

Business Strategy of the Combined Company

        The combined company expects to create long-term shareholder value by pursuing the following business strategy:

        Exploitation of Reserves in Known Formations.    As opposed to exploration operations associated with primary production, all of the value in an exploitation operation is in the development and production of proven and probable reserves in known and established formations and thus exploitation operations generally have less risk. Our exploitation efforts will involve the application of EOR techniques to mature oil and gas properties, including infill drilling, well deepening, uphole re-completions, re-fracturing, waterfloods and CO2 flooding.

        Our portfolio is composed of mature fields with proved reserves recoverable from primary, secondary or tertiary production techniques, existing infrastructure and abundant technical information. Accordingly, our production growth is not dependent on exploratory drilling of new formations and the high degree of speculation associated with making new discoveries.

        Acquire Strategic Assets.    Outside our existing operations, we continue to review opportunities to acquire additional assets with similar characteristics to our current asset base. We intend to concentrate on properties with strong upside potential from secondary and/or tertiary recovery from existing proven reserves, including PDP, PDNP, PUD and probable reserves.

        Further Geographical Diversification of Portfolio with High Potential Properties.    We intend to broaden our portfolio into other long-life, mature U.S. oil and gas basins. In the longer-term, we may expand our portfolio outside the United States. Our board and managment have extensive experience with operations outside of the United States and we intend to investigate similar exploitation opportunities in other jurisdictions, including South America and Central Canada.

Competitive Strengths of the Combined Company

        We believe that the combined company will have the following competitive strengths:

        Attractive Asset Base.    We believe we have a reserve base with significant exploitation potential. The combined company has 63.3 MMBOE of estimated proved reserves, which were 80% oil, with a PV-10 value of approximately $664.5 million as of June 30, 2009. The proximity of our properties to existing CO2 infrastructure provides potential for significant new reserve and production growth through tertiary recovery techniques not contemplated in our current proven reserves.

        Technical Expertise.    Our management team has significant experience in executing large scale waterflood and CO2 projects. Our current operational and technical team averages over 25 years of experience and has executed dozens of secondary and tertiary projects during their careers. In addition, we believe that our broad technical and operational expertise enables us to identify a wide range of production and reserve growth opportunities when evaluating acquisitions with reserve exploitation potential.

        Diversified Operations and Operational Control.    Our operations are broadly distributed across 14 properties on approximately 75,000 gross acres in Texas, New Mexico and Oklahoma, and we produce from over 25 different formations. As of May 28, 2010 on a pro forma combined basis, the combined company produced oil and natural gas from 1,501 wells and operated 100% of its current production. We believe our control over the operation of our properties along with the geological diversity of our

III-3


Table of Contents


reserves and the number of wells that we operate reduce our dependence on specific properties, formations or producing wells, thereby reducing operational and reserve risk.

        Highly Experienced Senior Management with Significant Equity Stake.    Our management team includes individuals who have, on average, more than 30 years of experience in the oil and gas sector. Our management team and board of directors currently own or control approximately 9.5% of our outstanding shares.

        Relationship with Torch Energy Advisors.    Our relationship with Torch, a privately owned, Houston-based energy company, provides us access to additional experienced oil and gas professionals with valuable technical expertise. We are able to leverage our relationship with Torch and it presents us with acquisition opportunities that fit our strategy. Currently, Torch is Resaca's largest shareholder and provides it management services.

Resaca's Properties

        Resaca's properties are located in West Texas and Southeast New Mexico on the Central Basin Platform of the Permian Basin and consist of approximately 15,000 gross/14,000 net acres contained in three main field complexes and a group of minor fields. Resaca's primary fields, which contain 89% of Resaca's current proved and probable reserves, are the Cooper Jal Unit Properties in Lea County, New Mexico; the Penwell Properties in Ector and Crane Counties, Texas; and the Grand Clearfork Unit Properties in Pecos County, Texas, which we refer to as the Resaca Primary Properties. The Resaca Primary Properties currently produce from the Yates, Seven Rivers, Queen, Grayburg, San Andres, Clearfork and Tansil formations. The Resaca Primary Properties include approximately 178 producing wells, 58 injection wells and 20 shut-in wells. Resaca's exploitation plan, which was initiated in 2006, is to reactivate most of the shut-in wells, reactivate and seek to optimize the existing waterfloods and conduct a significant infill drilling program. Resaca believes that the Resaca Primary Properties represent excellent opportunities for the development of low risk oil reserves.

        The Resaca Primary Properties were originally developed in the mid 1950s, with development and waterflood initiation continuing until the mid 1970s, at a time of significantly lower oil and natural gas prices and prior to the availability of current completion and fracturing techniques and the development of technologies which greatly enhance the exploitation of proved reserves. In addition to Resaca's other exploitation opportunities, Resaca believes the Resaca Primary Properties are excellent candidates for tertiary recovery by CO2 flooding. The use of CO2 for this type of enhanced recovery has revitalized many older proven oil producing fields in the Permian Basin. Several major companies are operating CO2 floods in the region and some of the Resaca Primary Properties were identified in a report dated February 2006 prepared by Advanced Resources International for the U.S. Department of Energy entitled "Basin Oriented Strategies for CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery: Permian Basin" as being amenable to CO2 enhanced oil recovery. Therefore, Resaca believes CO2 flooding provides a potential means to further enhance the value of the Resaca Primary Properties. Resaca engaged Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc. in Midland, Texas, to perform a feasibility study for CO2 flooding on all of the Resaca Primary Properties. This study identified that material amounts of incremental reserves in each of the Resaca Primary Properties could be accessed through CO2 flooding and estimated the CO2 recovery factor could be 7.5% to 8% depending on the field. Resaca believes that the CO2 flood could lead to additional recoveries of between 7% and 16% of the original oil in place, based on, among other things, published Permian Basin oil recovery rate projections.

        Resaca's June 30, 2009 proved reserves of 14.2 MMBOE were comprised of 2.4 MMBOE of PDP, 5.6 MMBOE of PDNP, and 6.2 MMBOE of PUD. Crude oil reserves accounted for 84% of our total proved reserves at June 30, 2009. Reserves were estimated using NYMEX, crude oil and natural gas prices and production and development costs in effect on June 30, 2009. On June 30, 2009, NYMEX

III-4


Table of Contents


crude oil and natural gas prices were $69.89 per barrel and $3.84 per MMBtu, respectively. The values reported may not necessarily reflect the fair market value of the reserves.

        Cooper Jal Unit Properties.    The Cooper Jal Unit Properties located in Lea County, New Mexico includes 2,560 acres. At the Cooper Jal Unit Properties, Resaca produces from three separate formations of Permian age from two separate fields, the Jal Mat and the Langlie Mattix. The Jal Mat field includes the Yates and Upper Seven Rivers formations, while the Langlie Mattix field includes the Lower Seven Rivers and the Queen formations. The Cooper Jal Unit Properties produce from the Yates, Seven Rivers and Queen formations at depths between 3,050 and 3,650 feet. Resaca acquired the Cooper Jal Unit Properties in May 2006. Resaca plans to continue developing additional production within the Cooper Jal Unit Properties from behind pipe recompletion work, infill drilling, fracture stimulation work, producing well stimulations, artificial lift upgrades and waterflood reactivation and optimization. Facility upgrades and water injection well cleanouts are also contemplated. Resaca's primary waterflood project is associated with the Yates and Seven Rivers formations within the Cooper Jal Unit Properties, which will require additional infill drilling and surface facilities. Resaca intends to continue to reactivate and expand the waterflood initiated by Texaco in the 1970s. Resaca achieved its target water injection rate of greater than 18,000 bbls of water per day in June 2009. Proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 attributable to Cooper Jal Unit Properties were 9.8 MMBOE, of which 1.4 MMBOE were PDP, 3.6 MMBOE were PDNP and 4.8 MMBOE were PUD. Additional probable oil reserves are projected to be accessed through tertiary recovery (CO2 flood) techniques. Net production at the Cooper Jal Properties for the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2010 was 325 BOEPD and 295 BOEPD, respectively. Resaca's working interest in the Cooper Jal Unit Properties is 72.5% and its net revenue interest is 55.7% for natural gas and 55.8% for oil. Other significant partners in the unit include BP and Sarita Energy Resources Limited. At the Cooper Jal Properties, the gross cumulative production divided by the sum of gross cumulative production and gross proved reserves is approximately 52%.

        Penwell Properties.    The Penwell Properties located in Ector and Crane Counties, Texas comprises the Jordan San Andres Unit (1,280 acres) and the Edwards Grayburg Unit (1,840 acres) and produces from the San Andres, Grayburg and Queen formations at depths between 3,000 and 3,600 feet. Resaca acquired the Penwell Properties in May 2006. As with the Cooper Jal Unit Properties, Resaca has identified that infill drilling opportunities exist within the Penwell Properties and anticipates facility upgrades and water injection upgrades. Resaca's primary objective at the Penwell Properties is to expand and optimize the current waterflood. Additional opportunities within the Penwell Properties include adding behind pipe zones, more waterflood expansion, producing well stimulations and drilling infill PUD locations. Proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 attributable to Penwell Properties were 1.7 MMBOE, of which 0.4 MMBOE were PDP, 0.4 MMBOE were PDNP and 0.9 MMBOE were PUD. Additional probable oil reserves are projected to be accessed through tertiary recovery (CO2 flood) techniques. Net production at the Pennwell Properties for the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2010 was 140 BOEPD and 143 BOEPD, respectively. Within the Penwell Properties fields, Resaca's working interest is 100% and its net revenue interest ranges from 79.0% to 80.2%.

        Grand Clearfork Unit Properties.    The Grand Clearfork Unit Properties located on 1,120 acres in Pecos County, Texas produces from both the Upper and Lower Clearfork formations at an average depth of approximately 2,500 feet. Resaca acquired the Grand Clearfolk Unit Properties in May 2006. Resaca believes the Grand Clearfork Unit Properties presents exploitation opportunities through infrastructure enhancement, re-completing wells, adding perforations and commingling production from multiple zones. In addition, Resaca has identified additional infill drilling locations in the Grand Clearfork Unit Properties. Proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 attributable to Grand Clearfork Unit Properties were 0.5 MMBOE, of which 0.1 MMBOE were PDP, 0.1 MMBOE were PDNP and 0.3 MMBOE were PUD. Additional probable oil reserves are projected to be accessed through tertiary recovery (CO2 flood) techniques. Net production at the Grand Clearfork Unit Properties for the

III-5


Table of Contents


quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2010 was 45 BOEPD and 47 BOEPD, respectively. In the Grand Clearfork Unit Properties, Resaca's working interest is 100% and its net revenue interest is 75.3%.

        Other Minor Properties.    These fields are located on 8,210 acres in Winkler, Howard, Ector, and Crane Counties in Texas and Eddy County, New Mexico and include the Kermit Complex, Iatan North, Kayser (Cowden South), McElroy and Cotton Draw/BTBN. Resaca acquired these properties in May 2006. Resaca has identified limited opportunities in these fields, which include infill drilling, recompletions and waterflood optimization. However, Resaca is considering selling some or all of these properties to concentrate its efforts on the exploitation of the Resaca Primary Properties and the acquisition of new properties. Proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 attributable to these properties were 2.1 MMBOE, of which 0.4 MMBOE were PDP, 1.5 MMBOE were PDNP and 0.2 MMBOE were PUD. Net production for the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2010 was 154 BOEPD and 150 BOEPD, respectively. In these fields, Resaca's working interests range from 50% to 100% and its net revenue interests range from 38.0% to 86.0%.

Cano's Properties

        Cato Properties.    Proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 attributable to the Cato Properties were 16.0 MMBOE, of which 1.9 MMBOE were PDP, 0.5 MMBOE were PDNP and 13.6 MMBOE were PUD. Cano acquired the Cato Properties in March 2007. These properties include roughly 20,000 acres across three fields in Chavez and Roosevelt Counties, New Mexico. The prime asset is the roughly 15,000 acre Cato Field, which produces from the historically prolific San Andres formation, which has been successfully waterflooded in the Permian Basin for over 30 years. There were two successful waterflood pilots conducted in the field in the 1970's by Shell and Amoco.

        Cano has experienced encouraging initial waterflood response at the Cato Field. The first phase of development (Phase I) includes 19 water injection wells, which we refer to as injectors, and 29 producing wells, which we refer to as producers. Once the injection permits were received in September 2008, Cano began injecting 7,000 barrels of water per day, which we refer to as BWIPD. As Cano continued injecting water into the field, waterflood production has grown from five producers during December 2008 offsetting a prior Amoco waterflood pilot to 29 producers experiencing production as of June 30, 2009. During January 2009, Cano increased the injection rate to approximately 12,000 BWIPD. During February 2009, Cano expanded the footprint of Phase 1 of the Cato Properties waterflood from 550 to roughly 640 acres and announced an increased capital expenditures budget to $49.8 million, of which $27.0 million was intended for the Cato Properties. Cano currently has ten sub-pumps operating in the field and plan to install additional sub-pumps to support increasing production and corresponding higher levels of fluid production. The sustained production gains at the Cato Properties are the result of an earlier than expected waterflood production response.

        The 2009 fiscal year drilling program at the Cato Properties, which comprised drilling nine wells (six waterflood producers and three waterflood injectors), was completed in October 2008. Normal production declines were experienced outside of the Phase I waterflooded area, but these declines were more than offset by increased production from the waterflood.

        At June 30, 2009, Cano booked proved reserves extensions and discoveries at the Cato Properties as Phase I results were better than initially expected. Field production increased from roughly 200 BOEPD to over 400 BOEPD after Cano commenced injection into 19 injection wells of the waterflood pattern which led to increased crude oil production in 29 producers. When Cano increased the waterflood footprint from 550 acres to 640 acres, the rate of water injection per acre decreased leading to a temporary decrease in production. Cano added approximately 2.6 MMBOE of new reserves based on the responses experienced through June 30, 2009. Additionally, 1.1 MMBOE of PUD

III-6


Table of Contents


reserves were reclassified to PDP reserves as a result of the responses experienced in Phase I. Cano plans to increase the number of injection wells and enlarge the waterflood footprint in the 2010 fiscal year. Net production at the Cato Properties averaged 316 BOEPD in June 2009.

        Cano's 2010 fiscal year development capital plan includes expanding the waterflood footprint from 640 acres to approximately 1,000 acres by adding three new injection wells, which were put into service in the second quarter of its 2010 fiscal year. Cano has identified a new source of water in a non-productive formation within its acreage, and has confirmed that the water well is capable of producing 2,500 to 3,000 barrels of water per day. This new water source formation has been penetrated in a number of existing wellbores in the Cato Properties and confirms the reservoir continuity necessary to validate it as a reliable water source for future expansion of the Cato waterflood. As Cano develops this new water source, it will be able to increase the waterflood footprint without decreasing the injection rate at its existing injectors, which should enable it to maintain production from existing producing wells at current levels. Cano averaged 14,000 BWIPD during the quarter ended September 30, 2009. Cano experienced a decrease to 12,000 BWIPD during its second and third quarters as it measured increasing injection pressures in the northern part of the flood area and was required, under its existing waterflood permit, to reduce the injection rate in these wells. On May 6, 2010, Cano received administrative approval from the New Mexico Oil and Gas Conservation Division to increase injection pressures at the 14 active wells to its current physical plant capabilities of approximately 21,000 BWIPD. Cano expects to see increasing fluid production rates and corresponding increasing oil rates as injection rates increase. Further development plans for the Cato Properties include behind-pipe recompletions, restoration of production from the Tom-Tom and Tomahawk fields, and the drilling of a Morrow formation test well. These development plans are contemplated to begin after the completion of the merger.

        Net production at the Cato Properties for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was 241 BOEPD, which was 11 BOEPD lower as compared to 252 BOEPD for the quarter ended December 31, 2009. The 11 BOEPD decrease resulted from the reduction in injected water and redistribution of water injection at the waterflood. Net production at the Cato Properties for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 was 264 BOEPD. Net production at the Cato Properties for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 was 313 BOEPD and 284 BOEPD, respectively.

        At the Cato Field, the gross cumulative production divided by the sum of gross cumulative production and gross proved reserves is approximately 50%.

        Panhandle Properties.    Proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 attributable to the Panhandle Properties were 28.9 MMBOE, of which 3.5 MMBOE were PDP and 25.4 MMBOE were PUD. In January 2010, Cano sold 17 producing and 2 non-producing wells at the Panhandle Properties comprising 0.5 MMBOE of proved reserves. Adjusting for the sale of these wells in the Panhandle Properties, the adjusted proved reserves at the Panhandle Properties would be 28.4 MMBOE, which comprised 3.0 MMBOE of PDP and 25.4 MMBOE of PUD. These properties include roughly 20,000 acres in Carson, Gray and Hutchinson Counties, Texas. Cano acquired the Panhandle Properties in November 2005. They are delineated in thirty-three leases—the largest of which are Cockrell Ranch, Pond, Harvey, Mobil Fee, Cooper, Block and Schafer Ranch.

        During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, Cano maintained its average daily water injection rate at the Cockrell Ranch Unit (its first Panhandle Properties waterflood) at roughly 75,000 barrels per day. This resulted in increasing its average daily production at the Cockrell Ranch Unit from approximately 80-100 net BOEPD between June and December 2008 to maintaining 100-120 net BOEPD production through June 30, 2009. While crude oil production continues to increase at Cockrell Ranch, the gains are below Cano's expectations. Based on actual performance of the waterflood through June 30, 2009, Cano reclassified 724 MBOE of PDP reserves back to PUD at June 30, 2009. After this reclassification, the remaining amount of the prior year conversion of PUD to PDP reserves is 674 MBOE.

III-7


Table of Contents

        In the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Cano retained an independent engineering firm to assist it with reservoir analysis and simulation modeling at the Cockrell Ranch unit. Based on this engineering firm's recommendations, Cano established a controlled water injection pattern to gauge the effects of optimizing water injection into the highest remaining crude oil saturation intervals of the Brown Dolomite formation. Cano is essentially performing a "Mini-Flood" in the key target interval at the Cockrell Ranch unit. The result of this field observation, coupled with rigorous reservoir simulation modeling, is expected to demonstrate an optimal pattern for waterflooding the balance of the Cockrell Ranch unit with an increasingly predicable production profile. Moreover, the field observation and modeling results will improve the planning of future development programs for the remaining leases located within its Panhandle Properties. To isolate the observed wells, Cano had temporarily shut-in production during most of the quarter ended September 30, 2009, which reduced Panhandle production by 25 net BOEPD. All production that was shut-in for the controlled injection project was restored on September 28, 2009. Cano has experienced positive results from the controlled injection project. Oil production from wells in the affected area has increased to at or above target levels of 8-12 BOEPD on a per well basis. These results, coupled with the accompanying reservoir simulation modeling, should allow a comprehensive analysis of the potential for the Cockrell Ranch Unit. Results of the studies should be completed in the third calendar quarter of 2010.

        Cano's original 2009 fiscal year waterflood capital development plan for the Panhandle Properties included six separate mini-floods on reduced well spacing to enable it to accelerate field development. Tighter well-spacing and smaller development patterns should accelerate permitting and response times, allowing a larger development footprint over a greater acreage position. The amended 2009 capital development plan provided for the development of only one mini-flood phase through June 2009 (the Harvey Unit). The Harvey Unit had its waterflood permit application approved by the Texas Railroad Commission on October 20, 2008. The Harvey Unit mini-flood consists of six injection wells and 13 producing wells (which required four new wells to be drilled among the existing wells at the field). The drilling of the four replacement injector wells was completed on January 5, 2009, thus completing the mini-flood pattern. Cano initiated injection at the Harvey Unit on March 30, 2009 at a rate of 2,500 barrels per day. During the 2009 fiscal year, Cano received approval of the mini-flood permits at the Pond Lease and at the Olive-Cooper Lease. As a result of the reduction in its capital plan and a focus on its Cato Properties, Cano slowed the filing of its Panhandle Properties mini-flood permits. Net production at the Panhandle Properties for June 2009 was 627 BOEPD.

        Net production at the Panhandle Properties, as adjusted for the sale of certain Panhandle Properties, for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 was 481 BOEPD and 479 BOEPD, respectively. During the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano constructed gathering lines to redirect natural gas production from Eagle Rock Field Services L.P., which we refer to as Eagle Rock, to DCP Midstream, LP, which we refer to as DCP. As of March 31, 2010, Cano had redirected approximately 80% of the natural gas production previously delivered to Eagle Rock to DCP. Net production at the Panhandle Properties for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 was 498 BOEPD and 485 BOEPD, respectively.

        In November 2009, at the Cockrell Ranch Unit, Cano performed an injection test of an Alkaline Surfactant Gas, which we refer to as ASG, recipe designed by the University of Texas, Austin, which we refer to as UT. The test involved injecting the ASG stream at the Cockrell 1R producing well. The five-day test allowed Cano to monitor surface pressure and rate measurements and analyze flow-back production data. Results from the test will allow Cano to evaluate ASG tertiary recovery potential for the Brown Dolomite reservoir in the Panhandle Properties.

        At the Panhandle Properties, the gross cumulative production divided by the sum of gross cumulative production and gross proved reserves is approximately 73%.

III-8


Table of Contents

        Desdemona Properties.    Proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 attributable to the Desdemona Properties were 1.4 MMBOE, of which 0.1 MMBOE were PDP and 1.3 MMBOE were PDNP. Approximately 1.3 MMBOE of the reserves were attributable to the Duke Sand reservoir. Cano acquired the Desdemona Properties in May 2004. As of June 30, 2009, Cano had no proved reserves associated with its Barnett Shale natural gas wells.

        Net production for June 2009 at the Desdemona Properties was 54 BOEPD.

        During July 2009, Cano shut-in its Barnett Shale natural gas wells based upon the current and near-term outlook of natural gas prices and production from the Barnett Shale wells on a per-well basis.

        Cano is in the midst of a project to return to production previously shut-in gas wells from the Duke Sand formation. Cano converted approximately 311 MBOE of previously PDNP reserves to PDP reserves with the return-to-production, which we refer to as RTP, of 12 previously shut-in wells in December 2009. Production increased from 46 BOEPD for the second quarter ending December 31, 2009 to 69 BOEPD for the three months ended March 31, 2010 without the benefit of selling any NGLs. Cano plans to RTP the remaining 13 wells during the quarter ended June 30, 2010. Production from all of the RTP gas wells, including associated NGL recovery from Cano's gas plant, is expected to be approximately 10-20 Mcfe per day for each gas well returned to production. Cano restarted its gas plant in April 2010 and expects to realize the full benefit of these produced volumes in May 2010.

        During the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano drilled one new well to a total depth of 3,650 feet to test the Marble Falls, Atoka and Strawn Sand formations. Cano has completed the new well in the Strawn Sand formation at a depth of 1,750 feet. The well had initial production, on April 16, 2010, of 20 BOPD, 50 MCFPD and 450 BWPD. Cano is currently evaluating three offset locations for future Strawn Sand development in the Desdemona Properties.

III-9


Table of Contents

        Net production at the Desdemona Properties for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 was 69 BOEPD and 51 BOEPD, respectively. Net production at the Desdemona Properties for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 was 55 BOEPD and 61 BOEPD, respectively. During July 2009, Cano shut-in its Barnett Shale natural gas wells based upon the then current outlook for natural gas prices from the Barnett Shale wells.

        Nowata Properties.    Cano's akaline-surfactant-polymer, which we refer to as ASP tertiary recovery pilot project, which we refer to as ASP Pilot, has been in full operation since December 2007. Through June 30, 2009, Cano injected close to .40 PVI of ASP and polymer flush. Cano drilled and completed four observation wells in December 2008, to enable it to test flood-front results in the pilot project. Cano completed injecting its polymer flush during June 2009. Analyses of the ASP Pilot results are complete. While Cano achieved some positive reaction to the surfactant in the reservoir, it was determined that the ASP recipe designed by an outside consultant would not achieve viable economics to justify commercial project development. The recipe did not take into consideration certain factors which lead to significant absorption of the surfactant in the reservoir rock. Cano has since retained the UT to study the ASP Pilot results at Nowata and develop an alternate recipe. Using the actual results of the ASP Pilot and performing additional coreflood studies, UT believes they have developed a new and optimal recipe that shows exceptional recoveries can be achieved at Nowata on a commercial basis. UT's work demonstrates that there is another solution to designing an optimal plan of development going forward. Cano believes that the lessons learned in regard to actual plant design and operation, fluid handling, injection pressures and rates, and producing fluid properties, may benefit full field development in the future and similar projects that Cano may undertake at its other properties.

        As a result of the non-commercial results from the ASP pilot, Cano recorded a $5.0 million pre-tax exploration expense during December 2009. There were no proved reserves associated with the ASP pilot project prior to the beginning of this pilot project.

        Net production for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 was 222 BOEPD and 219 BOEPD, respectively. Net production for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 was 227 BOEPD and 222 BOEPD, respectively.

        Davenport Properties.    Proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 attributable to the Davenport Properties were 1.3 MMBOE, of which 0.7 MMBOE were PDP and 0.6 MMBOE were PDNP. Net production for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 was 78 BOEPD and 75 BOEPD, respectively. Net production for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 was 70 BOEPD for each time period. Cano acquired the Davenport Properties in May 2004.

Internal Controls Over Preparation of Proved Reserves Estimates

        Upon completion of the merger, Resaca will adopt Cano's policies regarding internal controls over the recording of reserve estimates, which require reserve estimates to be in compliance with SEC rules, regulations and guidance and prepared in accordance with Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Properties Information (Revision as of February 19, 2007) promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers, which we refer to as SPE Standards. Our President and Chief Executive Operating Officer, or COO, Dennis Hammond, is the individual who will be responsible for overseeing the preparation of our reserve estimates and for internal compliance of our reserve estimates with SEC rules, regulations, guidance and SPE Standards. Mr. Hammond has over 30 years of industry experience with positions of increasing responsibility in engineering and evaluation of oil and gas properties. Mr. Hammond has a Bachelor of Science degree in petroleum engineering and is a registered professional engineer in the State of Texas. Mr. Hammond will report directly to our Chief Executive Officer. Our senior management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, will review our reserves estimates before these estimates are finalized and disclosed in a public filing or presentation. In addition, Resaca's procedures will require that our reserve reports be

III-10


Table of Contents


prepared by a registered independent engineering firm at the end of every year based on information provided by our Engineering and Operations Department.

        Our Engineering and Operations Department will accumulate historical production data for our wells, calculate historical lease operating expenses and differentials, update working interests and net revenue interests, obtain updated authorizations for expenditure and obtains logs, 3-D seismic and other geological and geophysical information. This data will be forwarded to Resaca's registered independent engineering firm, Haas. Haas will prepare a report of our estimated proved reserves in their entirety based on the information provided to them.

        In accordance with applicable requirements of the SEC, estimates of our net proved reserves and future net revenues have historically been made using the price at the end of the period prior to the date of such reserve estimates and held constant throughout the life of the properties. Beginning with our fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, estimates of our net proved reserves and future net revenues will be made using average prices at the beginning of each month in the 12-month period prior to the date of such reserve estimates and held constant throughout the life of the properties (except to the extent a contract specifically provides for escalation). Estimated quantities of net proved reserves and future net revenues therefrom are affected by oil and natural gas prices, which have fluctuated widely in recent years.

        There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating oil and natural gas reserves and their estimated values, including many factors beyond our control. The reserve data set forth in the reports of our registered independent engineering firms represents only estimates. Reservoir engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and natural gas that cannot be measured in an exact manner. The accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geologic interpretation and judgment. As a result, estimates of different engineers, including those used by us, may vary. In addition, estimates of reserves are subject to revision based upon actual production, results of future development and exploration activities, prevailing oil and natural gas prices, operating costs and other factors. The revisions may be material. Accordingly, reserve estimates are often different from the quantities of oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered and are highly dependent upon the accuracy of the assumptions upon which they are based. Our estimated net proved reserves, included in our SEC filings, have not been filed with or included in reports to any other federal agency. See "Risk Factors—The present value of future net cash flows from Resaca's and Cano's proved reserves may not be the same as the current market value of Resaca's and Cano's estimated crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids, which we refer to as NGLs, reserves" on page I-70.

        Estimates with respect to net proved reserves that may be developed and produced in the future are often based upon volumetric calculations and upon analogy to similar types of reserves rather than actual production history. Estimates based on these methods are generally less reliable than those based on actual production history. Subsequent evaluation of the same reserves based upon production history will result in variations in the estimated reserves that may be substantial.

III-11


Table of Contents

Combined Company Production, Estimated Proved Reserves and Acreage

        The following table shows selected data concerning our combined production, estimated proved reserve and acreage for the periods indicated on a pro forma combined basis:

Field
  April
2010
Average Daily
Production (BOE)
  Total Est. Proved
Reserves
MMBOE
(As of June 30,
2009)(1)
  Percent of
Total Est. Proved Reserves MMBOE
  PV-10 (As of
June 30,
2009)
(In Millions)(1)
  Gross Acres
(As of
May 28,
2010)(2)
  Net Acres
(As of
May 28,
2010)(3)
 

Texas Properties

                                     

Panhandle Properties

    563     28.9     45.7 % $ 323.9     20,387     20,387  

Penwell Complex

    155     1.7     2.7 %   19.8     3,120     3,120  

Desdemona Properties

    78     1.4     2.2 %   7.1     11,264     11,264  

Grand Clearfork Unit Properties

    46     0.5     0.8 %   4.6     1,120     1,120  

Other Minor Properties

    153     2.0     3.1 %   31.4     7,890     7,823  

New Mexico Properties

                                     

Cato Properties

    254     16.0     25.3 %   116.5     21,122     20,662  

Cooper Jal Unit Properties

    364     9.8     15.5 %   134.8     2,560     1,855  

Other Minor Properties

    7     0.2     0.3 %   2.6     320     240  

Oklahoma Properties

                                     

Nowata Properties

    223     1.5     2.4 %   13.9     4,594     4,594  

Davenport Properties

    80     1.3     2.0 %   9.9     2,178     2,178  

Other Locations

                                     
                           
 

Total

    1,923     63.3     100.0 % $ 664.5     74,555     73,243  

(1)
PV-10 is a non-GAAP financial measure and generally differs from the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, because it does not include the effects of income taxes on future net revenues. At June 30, 2009, our standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows was $418.2 million on a combined basis as shown below. Our estimated proved reserves and future net revenues, PV-10, and standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows were determined using end of the period prices for oil and natural gas that Resaca and Cano realized as of June 30, 2009, which were $69.89 per Bbl of oil and $3.84 per MMBtu of natural gas and $69.89 per Bbl of oil and $3.71 per MMBtu of natural gas, respectively.

The following table shows the combined company's reconciliation of our PV-10 to the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows. PV-10 is our estimate of the present value of future net revenues from estimated proved oil and gas reserves after deducting estimated production and ad valorem taxes, future capital costs and operating expenses, but before deducting any estimates of future income taxes. The estimated future net revenues are discounted at an annual rate of 10% to determine their "present value." We believe PV-10 to be an important measure for evaluating the relative significance of our oil and gas properties and that the presentation of the non-GAAP financial measure of PV-10 provides useful information to investors because it is widely used by professional analysts and sophisticated investors in evaluating oil and gas companies. Because there are many unique factors that can impact an individual company when estimating the amount of future income taxes to be paid, we believe the use of a pre-tax measure is valuable for evaluating our company. We believe that most other companies in the oil and gas industry calculate PV-10 on the same basis.

III-12


Table of Contents

(in millions)
  Pro forma of
June 30,
2009
 

PV-10

  $ 664.5  
 

Less: Undiscounted income taxes

    (689.8 )
 

Plus: 10% discount factor

    443.5  
       

Discounted income taxes

    (246.3 )
       

Standard measure of discounted future net cash flows

  $ 418.2  
       
(2)
"Gross" acres refers to acreage in which we have a working interest.

(3)
"Net" acres refers to the aggregate of our percentage working interest in gross acreage before royalties or other payouts, as appropriate.

Resaca's Proved Reserves

        The following table summarizes Resaca's proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 and was prepared according to the rules and regulations of the SEC.

 
  Cooper Jal   Penwell   Grand Clearfork   Other   Total  

Oil—MBbls

    8,180     1,428     504     1,856     11,968  

Gas—MMcf

    9,921     1,748         1,630     13,299  

Oil Equivalent (MBOE)

    9,833     1,719     504     2,128     14,184  

        Resaca's proved oil and natural gas reserves as of June 30, 2009 have been prepared by Haas Petroleum Engineering Services, Inc. As defined in the SEC rules, proved reserves are the estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids which geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions (i.e., prices and costs as of the date the estimate is made). Prices include consideration of changes in existing prices provided only by contractual arrangements, but not on escalations based upon future conditions. Reservoirs are considered proved if economic productibility is supported by either actual production or conclusive formation tests. The area of a reservoir considered proved includes (A) that portion delineated by drilling and defined by gas-oil and/or oil-water contacts, if any; and (B) the immediately adjoining portions not yet drilled, but which can be reasonably judged as economically productive on the basis of available geological and engineering data. In the absence of information on fluid contacts, the lowest known structural occurrence of hydrocarbons controls the lower proved limit of the reservoir. Reserves which can be produced economically through application of improved recovery techniques (such as fluid injections) are included in the "proved" classification when successful testing by a pilot project, or the operations of an installed program in the reservoir, provides support for the engineering analysis on which the project or program was based. Due to the inherent uncertainties and the limited nature of reservoir data, such estimates are subject to change as additional information becomes available. The reserves actually recovered and the timing of production of these reserves may be substantially different from the original estimate. Revisions result primarily from new information obtained from development drilling, production history and from changes in economic factors.

        As of June 30, 2009, Resaca's proved reserves equated to 14.2 MMBOE of proved reserves, consisting of 2.3 MMBOE (16%) of PDP reserves, 5.7 MMBOE (40%) of PDNP reserves and 6.2 MMBOE (44%) of PUD reserves.

III-13


Table of Contents

        Reserves were estimated using crude oil and natural gas prices and production and development costs in effect on June 30, 2009. The crude oil and natural gas prices used in estimating Resaca's June 30, 2009 reserves were $69.89 per barrel and $3.84 per MMBtu, respectively. The values reported may not necessarily reflect the fair market value of the reserves.

Cano's Proved Reserves

        The following table summarizes Cano's proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 and was prepared according to the rules and regulations of the SEC.

 
  Davenport   Desdemona   Cato   Panhandle   Nowata   Total  

Oil—MBbls

    1,237     366     14,867     20,888     1,413     38,771  

Gas—MMcf

    425     6,196     6,619     47,913     800     61,953  

Oil Equivalent (MBOE)

    1,308     1,399     15,970     28,873     1,547     49,097  

        Cano's proved oil and natural gas reserves as of June 30, 2009 have been prepared by Miller and Lents, Ltd., international oil and gas consultants.

        Cano has not reported its reserves to any federal authority or agency other than the SEC pursuant to its filings with the SEC.

        At June 30, 2009, Cano's proved reserves equated to 49.1 MMBOE of proved reserves, consisting of 7.7 MMBOE (16%) of PDP reserves, 2.4 MMBOE (5%) of PDNP reserves and 39.0 MMBOE (79%) of PUD reserves. Adjusting for Cano's sale of wells in the Panhandle Properties during January 2010, Cano's adjusted proved reserves at June 30, 2009 would be 48.6 MMBOE, which comprised 7.2 MMBOE of PDP, 2.4 MMBOE of PDNP, and 39.0 MMBOE of PUD; and crude oil reserves accounted for 80.2% of total proved reserves.

        Reserves were estimated using crude oil and natural gas prices and production and development costs in effect on June 30, 2009. On June 30, 2009, crude oil and natural gas prices were $69.89 per barrel and $3.71 per MMBtu, respectively. The values reported may not necessarily reflect the fair market value of the reserves.

III-14


Table of Contents

Resaca's Operating Revenues

        The following table presents Resaca's sales, unit prices and average unit costs for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007 and for the nine months ended March 31, 2010:

 
   
  Years Ended June 30,  
 
  Nine Months
Ended
March 31, 2010
 
 
  2009   2008   2007  

Operating Revenues(1): (000's)

  $ 11,285   $ 14,567   $ 21,729   $ 15,069  

Sales:

                         
 

Oil (MBbls)

    143     189     204     223  
 

Gas (MMcf)

    184     287     309     328  
 

MBOE

    174     237     256     277  

Average Price(1):

                         
 

Oil ($/Bbl)

  $ 70.51   $ 65.29   $ 91.57   $ 56.92  
 

Gas ($/Mcf)

  $ 6.53   $ 6.55   $ 9.85   $ 7.28  
 

$/BOE

  $ 64.99   $ 61.45   $ 85.03   $ 54.31  

Average Adjusted Price(2):

                         
 

Oil ($/Bbl)

  $ 66.20   $ 60.60   $ 75.73   $ 58.27  
 

Gas ($/Mcf)

  $ 8.62   $ 8.20   $ 10.05   $ 7.65  
 

$/BOE

  $ 63.64   $ 59.70   $ 72.62   $ 55.84  

Expense (per BOE):

                         

Lease operating

  $ 26.43   $ 27.94   $ 27.42   $ 27.41  

Production and ad valorem taxes

  $ 4.43   $ 5.27   $ 6.51   $ 4.93  

General and administrative expense, net(3)

  $ 35.97   $ 29.89   $ 7.68   $ 5.60  

Depreciation and depletion

  $ 16.61   $ 14.22   $ 11.39   $ 10.21  

Total

  $ 83.44   $ 77.32   $ 53.00   $ 48.15  

(1)
Excludes the effect of realized gains or losses from commodity price risk management activities.

(2)
Includes the effect of realized gains or losses from commodity price risk management activities.

(3)
Includes share based compensation costs and Cano merger costs for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and the year ended June 30, 2009.

III-15


Table of Contents

Cano's Operating Revenues

        The following table presents Cano's sales, unit prices and average unit costs for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007 and for the nine months ended March 31, 2010.

 
  Nine Months
Ended
March 31,
2010
  Years Ended June 30,  
 
  2009   2008   2007  

Operating Revenues(1): (000's)

  $ 16,368   $ 25,409   $ 34,650   $ 20,651  

Sales:

                         
 

Crude Oil (MBbls)

    208     309     249     223  
 

Natural Gas (MMcf)

    324     776     908     824  
 

MBOE

    262     438     401     360  

Average Price(1):

                         
 

Crude Oil ($/Bbl)

  $ 67.56   $ 62.17   $ 94.08   $ 61.96  
 

Natural Gas ($/Mcf)

  $ 7.17   $ 7.57   $ 11.99   $ 8.29  
 

$/BOE

  $ 62.49   $ 57.23   $ 85.72   $ 57.31  

Average Adjusted Price(2)

                         
 

Crude Oil ($/Bbl)

  $ 73.48   $ 75.84   $ 81.92   $ 62.17  
 

Natural Gas ($/Mcf)

  $ 15.09   $ 10.23   $ 12.84   $ 9.41  
 

$/BOE

  $ 76.97   $ 71.60   $ 79.26   $ 59.98  

Expense (per BOE):

                         

Lease operating

  $ 44.98   $ 42.96   $ 33.14   $ 24.24  

Production and ad valorem taxes

  $ 5.21   $ 5.37   $ 6.13   $ 4.70  

General and administrative expense, net(3)

  $ 35.73   $ 43.68   $ 37.10   $ 35.06  

Depreciation and depletion

  $ 13.84   $ 13.05   $ 9.74   $ 8.89  

Total

  $ 99.76   $ 105.06   $ 86.11   $ 72.89  

(1)
Excludes the effect of realized gains or losses from commodity price risk management activities.

(2)
Includes the effect of realized gains or losses from commodity price risk management activities.

(3)
Includes share-based compensation costs for each period presented and Resaca merger costs for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and the year ended June 30, 2009.

Resaca's Productive Wells and Acreage

        The following table shows Resaca's gross and net interests in productive oil and natural gas working interest wells as of May 28, 2010. Productive wells include wells currently producing or capable of production.

Gross(1)   Net(2)
Oil   Gas   Total   Oil   Gas   Total

425

    425   404     404

(1)
"Gross" refers to wells in which we have a working interest.

(2)
"Net" refers to the aggregate of our percentage working interest in gross wells before royalties or other payout, as appropriate.

        Resaca operates all of the gross producing wells presented above. As of May 28, 2010, Resaca had 33 wells containing multiple completions.

III-16


Table of Contents

        As of May 28, 2010, Resaca had total acreage of 15,010 gross acres and 14,158 net acres, all of which was considered developed acreage. The definitions of gross acres and net acres conform to how Resaca determines gross wells and net wells. Developed acreage is assigned to producing wells. Undeveloped acreage is acreage under lease, permit, contract or option that is not in the spacing unit for a producing well, including leasehold interests identified for exploitation drilling.

Cano's Productive Wells and Acreage

        The following table shows Cano's gross and net interests in productive oil and natural gas working interest wells as of May 28, 2010. Productive wells include wells currently producing or capable of production.

Gross(1)   Net(2)
Oil   Gas   Total   Oil   Gas   Total
1,846   88   1,934   1,836   88   1,924

(1)
"Gross" refers to wells in which we have a working interest.

(2)
"Net" refers to the aggregate of our percentage working interest in gross wells before royalties or other payout, as appropriate.

        Cano operates all of the gross producing wells presented above. As of May 28, 2010, Cano had 17 wells containing multiple completions.

        On May 28, 2010, Cano had total acreage of 59,545 gross acres and 59,085 net acres, all of which was considered developed acreage. The definitions of gross acres and net acres conform to how Cano determines gross wells and net wells. Developed acreage is assigned to producing wells. Undeveloped acreage is acreage under lease, permit, contract or option that is not in the spacing unit for a producing well, including leasehold interests identified for exploitation drilling.

Resaca's Drilling Activity

        The following table shows Resaca's drilling activities on a net basis for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and for the nine months ended March 31, 2010. All of the wells below were productive.

 
   
  Years Ended June 30,  
 
  Nine Months
Ended
March 31, 2010
 
 
  2009   2008   2007  

Exploratory Wells

                 

Development Wells

        4.62         6.52  
                   
 

Total Wells Drilled

        4.62         6.52  

III-17


Table of Contents

Cano's Drilling Activity

        The following table shows Cano's drilling activities on a gross basis for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and for the nine months ended March 31, 2010. Cano owns 100% working interests in all wells drilled.

 
  Nine Months
Ended
March 31,
2010
  Years Ended June 30,  
 
  2009   2008   2007  
 
  Gross(1)   Gross(1)   Gross(1)   Gross(1)  

Exploratory

                         
 

Oil(3)

        4         22  

Development

                         
 

Gas(2)

            4     19  
 

Oil(3)

    1     14     62     39  
 

Abandoned(4)

            2      
                   
   

Total

    1     18     68     80  

(1)
"Gross" is the number of wells in which we have a working interest.

(2)
"Gas" means natural gas wells that are either currently producing or are capable of production.

(3)
"Oil" means producing oil wells.

(4)
"Abandoned" means wells that were dry when drilled or were abandoned without production casing being run.

Planned Development Program

        We believe that our portfolio of oil and natural gas properties provides opportunities to apply our operational strategy. On a pro forma combined basis, as of June 30, 2009, we had estimated proved reserves of 63.3 MMBOE, of which 10.1 MMBOE were on PDP, 8.0 MMBOE were PDNP, and 45.2 MMBOE were PUD.

        Our exploitation plan involves the reactivation of shut-in wells, recompletion of currently producing wells, implementation of new waterfloods, reactivation and optimization of the existing waterfloods, and enhancement of and conduct a significant infill drilling program. We believe our properties represent excellent opportunities for the development of low risk oil and gas reserves and many of our properties are excellent candidates for tertiary recovery by CO2 flooding based on reports and studies performed on these properties. We will also continue to evaluate potential acquisition targets that are consistent with our operational strategy.

        Waterflooding and EOR techniques involve significant capital investment and extended lead times of generally a year or longer from the initial phase of a program until production increases. As our capital budget exceeds expected cash from operations, our ability to successfully convert our PUD reserves to PDP reserves will be contingent upon our ability to obtain future financing. Further, there are inherent uncertainties associated with the production of oil and natural gas as well as price volatility.

        Additionally, our combined company's reserve report at December 31, 2009 assumes we will spend approximately $51 million on development capital expenditures during calendar year 2010 to develop estimated proved nonproducing and proved undeveloped reserves. As a result of the timing of the closing of the merger, approximately $15 million of our development capital expenditures initially

III-18


Table of Contents


planned for calendar year 2010 have been deferred. On a combined basis, we expect to spend approximately $36 million on development capital expenditures through calendar year 2010, $4 million of which had been incurred at March 31, 2010.

        Resaca's present development activities primarily involve implementing and enhancing waterflood injection at the Cooper Jal Unit Properties, Penwell Properties, and the Grand Clearfork Unit Properties. In addition, as of December 18, 2009, Resaca was implementing a five gross well (3.625 net well) recompletion program at its Cooper Jal Unit Properties.

        Cano's present development activities primarily involve implementing waterflood injection at the Cato and Panhandle Properties.

Delivery Commitments

        At March 31, 2010, Resaca and Cano have no delivery commitments with their purchasers and currently have no delivery commitments.

Rig Acquisition

        In July 2009, Resaca announced that it had reached agreement with PBWS, an affiliate of Resaca, to acquire a number of workover rigs, reversing units and related assets as well as real estate. Pursuant to the terms of the asset transfer agreement between Resaca and PBWS, Resaca acquired three mobile workover rigs, two reversing units and related power swivels, fishing tools, other ancillary tools and equipment, vehicles, trailers, construction equipment and spare parts, which we refer to as the Equipment, together with an office building, a shop and a yard in Odessa, Texas, which we refer to as the Office Space. In December 2009, Resaca vacated its prior offices and moved into the Office Space. Since Resaca's formation in 2006, PBWS had provided approximately 40%-60% of Resaca's workover and reversing unit services. These services were provided to Resaca on a priority basis, and the hourly rates were charged in accordance with industry rates. Resaca concluded, however, that there were economic and operational benefits to be gained from owning and operating the Equipment and owning the Office Space.

        Torch E&P Company, which we refer to as Torch E&P, was issued 3,320,250 shares of Resaca common stock under the terms of the asset transfer agreement entered into by Resaca and PBWS. Torch E&P is a shareholder of Resaca and the parent company of PBWS. Torch E&P is 90%-owned by J.P. Bryan, Resaca's Chairman of the board of directors and 10%-owned by John J. Lendrum, III, Resaca's Chief Executive Officer. At the request of PBWS, the shares issued pursuant to the asset transfer agreement were issued directly to Torch E&P.

        The assets acquired by Resaca pursuant to the asset transfer agreement were valued by two independent appraisers, an equipment specialist and a real estate specialist. The value ascribed to the assets by the independent appraiser was $1,593,720. Resaca paid consideration of $1,593,720 for the assets in the form of 3,320,250 new shares of Resaca common stock issued by Resaca for this purpose and representing 3.5% of the enlarged issued share capital of Resaca. The number of shares of Resaca common stock issued to Torch E&P was determined by dividing the purchase price by $0.48, which reflects the July 6, 2009 closing stock price on the AIM of £0.295 per share, converted at an exchange rate of U.S. $1.627 per British pound. The July 6, 2009 price reflects an approximate 12% premium over the trailing 30 day share price. As a 90% owner of Torch E&P, Mr. Bryan's interest in the consideration paid by Resaca for the rig acquisition is $1,434,348 and as a 10% owner of Torch E&P, Mr. Lendrum's interest in the consideration paid by Resaca for the rig acquisition is $159,372.

III-19


Table of Contents

        The asset transfer agreement requires the ratification of the Rig Acquisition by Resaca's shareholders at the Resaca annual meeting.

Title/Mortgages

        Our oil and natural gas properties are subject to customary royalty interests, liens incident to operating agreements, liens for current taxes and other burdens, including other mineral encumbrances and restrictions as well as mortgage liens in accordance with our credit agreements. We do not believe that any of these burdens materially interferes with the use of our properties in the operation of our business.

        We believe that we have generally satisfactory title to or rights in all of our producing properties. When we make acquisitions, we make title investigations, but may not receive title opinions of local counsel until we commence drilling operations. We believe that we have satisfactory title to all of our other assets. Although title to our properties is subject to encumbrances in certain cases, we believe that none of these burdens will materially detract from the value of our properties or from our interest therein or will materially interfere with our use of them in the operation of our business.

Acquisitions

        We regularly pursue and evaluate acquisition opportunities (including opportunities to acquire oil and natural gas properties and related assets or entities owning oil and natural gas properties or related assets, and opportunities to engage in mergers, consolidations or other business combinations with entities owning oil and natural gas properties or related assets) and at any given time may be in various stages of evaluating such opportunities. Such stages include: internal financial and oil and natural gas property analysis, preliminary due diligence, the submission of an indication of interest, preliminary negotiations and negotiation of a letter of intent or negotiation of a definitive agreement.

Customers

        We sell our crude oil and natural gas production to multiple independent purchasers pursuant to contracts generally terminable by either party upon thirty days' prior written notice to the other party. During the year ended June 30, 2009, 10% or more of Resaca's total revenues were attributable to two customers accounting for 74% of the total. Shell Trading (US) Company accounted for 37% of revenues and ConocoPhillips accounted for 37% of revenues. During the year ended June 30, 2009, 10% or more of Cano's total revenues were attributable to five customers accounting for 32% (Valero Marketing Supply Co.), 18% (Coffeyville Resources Refinery and Marketing, LLC), 15% (Plains Marketing, LP), 13% (Eagle Rock), and 10% (DCP) of total operating revenue, respectively. On March 31, 2009, Cano received notice from Eagle Rock that it would be terminating its gas purchase agreement with Cano due to the decrease in oil and natural gas prices unless Cano agreed to accept Eagle Rock's proposed new pricing terms. Cano was unable to reach a new agreement with Eagle Rock. Beginning on June 2, 2009, Cano began selling natural gas production to Eagle Rock on a sliding scale based upon the volume of fluid it sells per each delivery point for both natural gas and NGLs. On August 4, 2009, Cano entered into a new Gas Purchase Contract, which we refer to as the DCP Agreement, with DCP, effective on July 1, 2009, which supersedes the previous gas purchase contract, as amended, with DCP. Previously, all of Cano's Panhandle Properties' leases and wells were dedicated to DCP and Eagle Rock. The new DCP Agreement dedicates all of Cano's Panhandle Properties' leases and wells to DCP. Subject to certain conditions, the term of the DCP Agreement runs until April 30, 2016 and, unless terminated upon 60 days' prior notice, continues thereafter on a year-to-year basis. Pursuant to the terms of the DCP Agreement, Cano will be paid on a sliding scale based upon the volume of NGLs and natural gas it sells per each delivery point. Cano will continue to sell, on a month-to-month basis, natural gas and NGLs in the Texas Panhandle to Eagle Rock until such time as

III-20


Table of Contents


any given well is added to new delivery points on the DCP pipeline. Revenue enhancements under the DCP Agreement will offset the effect of volumes sold to Eagle Rock.

        Title to the produced commodities transfers to the purchaser at the time the purchaser collects or receives such commodities. Prices for such production are defined in sales contracts and are readily determinable based on certain publicly available indices. The purchasers of such production have historically made payment for crude oil and natural gas purchases within thirty-five days of the end of each production month. We periodically review the difference between the dates of production and the dates we collects payment for such production to ensure that receivables from those purchasers are collectible. The point of sale for our oil and natural gas production is at our applicable field gathering systems.

        In the event that one or more of these significant purchasers ceases doing business with us, we believe that there are potential alternative purchasers with whom we could establish new relationships and that those relationships would result in the replacement of one or more lost purchasers. We would not expect the loss of any single purchaser to have a material adverse effect on our operations. However, the loss of a single purchaser could potentially reduce the competition for our crude oil and natural gas production, which could negatively impact the prices we receive.


Competition

        The oil and gas industry is highly competitive. Our competitors include major oil companies as well as independent producers. We face competition from other oil and natural gas companies in all aspects of our business, including in the acquisition of producing properties and oil and natural gas leases, and in obtaining goods, services and labor. Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial and other resources than we do. Factors that affect our ability to acquire producing properties include available funds, available information about the property and our standards established for minimum projected return on investment.

        We believe that our leasehold acreage position, workover rig assets, and technical and operational capabilities generally enable us to compete effectively. However, the natural gas and oil industry is intensely competitive and we face competition in each of our geographical areas. We believe our geographic concentration of operations enable us to compete effectively. We believe the type, age and condition of our workover rigs, the quality of our crews and the responsiveness of our management generally enable us to provide quality services that benefit our oil and gas exploitation activities and provides competitive strength. However, we compete with companies that have greater financial and personnel resources than we do. These companies may be able to pay more for producing properties and undeveloped acreage. In addition, these companies may have a greater ability to continue exploitation activities during periods of low natural gas and oil market prices. Our larger or integrated competitors may be able to absorb the burden of any existing and future federal, state, and local laws and regulations more easily than we can, which would adversely affect our competitive position. Our ability to acquire additional properties and to discover reserves in the future will be dependent upon our ability to evaluate and select suitable properties and to consummate transactions in a highly competitive environment. In addition, because we have fewer financial and human resources than many companies in our industry, we may be at a disadvantage in bidding for oil and natural gas properties.


Leased Properties

        We pay a monthly fee to Torch for the use of (a) a portion of Torch's 25,696 square feet of office space located in Houston, Texas and (b) Torch's office equipment, machinery, certain facilities personnel and shared administrative personnel.

        We also lease 24,303 square feet of office space in Ft. Worth, Texas. Cano has retained a broker to sublease the Ft. Worth office space in order to reduce office space rental expense.

III-21


Table of Contents


Legal Proceedings

        Both Cano and Resaca are subject to periodic lawsuits, investigations and claims, including environmental claims and employee related matters, arising in the ordinary conduct of their respective businesses. Although we cannot predict with certainty the ultimate resolution of lawsuits, investigations and claims asserted against us, we do not believe that any currently pending legal proceedings to which we are a party that are not set forth below will have a material adverse effect on our respective businesses, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. Managements' position is supported, in part, by the existence of insurance coverage, indemnification and escrow accounts.

        On March 23, 2006, the following lawsuit was filed in the 100th Judicial District Court in Carson County, Texas; Cause No. 9840, The Tom L. and Anne Burnett Trust, by Anne Burnett Windfohr, Windi Phillips, Ben Fortson, Jr., George Beggs, III and Ed Hudson, Jr. as Co-Trustees; Anne Burnett Windfohr; and Burnett Ranches, Ltd. v. Cano Petroleum, Inc., W.O. Energy of Nevada, Inc., W. O. Operating Company, Ltd. and WO Energy, Inc. The plaintiffs claim that the electrical wiring and equipment of Cano or certain of its subsidiaries relating to oil and natural gas operations started a wildfire that began on March 12, 2006 in Carson County, Texas.

        The plaintiffs (i) allege negligence and gross negligence and (ii) seek damages, including, but not limited to, damages for damage to their land and livestock, certain expenses related to fighting the fire and certain remedial expenses totaling approximately $1.7 million to $1.8 million. In addition, the plaintiffs seek (i) termination of certain oil and natural gas leases, (ii) reimbursement for their attorney's fees (in the amount of at least $549,000) and (iii) exemplary damages. The plaintiffs also claim that Cano and its subsidiaries are jointly and severally liable as a single business enterprise and/or a general partnership or de facto partnership. The owner of the remainder of the mineral estate, Texas Christian University, intervened in the suit on August 18, 2006, joining Plaintiffs' request to terminate certain oil and gas leases. On June 21, 2007, the judge of the 100th Judicial District Court issued a Final Judgment (a) granting motions for summary judgment in favor of Cano and certain of its subsidiaries on plaintiffs' claims for (i) breach of contract/termination of an oil and gas lease; and (ii) negligence; and (b) granting the plaintiffs' no-evidence motion for summary judgment on contributory negligence, assumption of risk, repudiation and estoppel affirmative defenses asserted by Cano and certain of its subsidiaries.

        The Final Judgment was appealed and a decision was reached on March 11, 2009, as the Court of Appeals for the Tenth District of Texas in Amarillo affirmed in part and reversed in part the ruling of the 100th Judicial District Court. The Court of Appeals (a) affirmed the trial court's granting of summary judgment in Cano's favor for breach of contract/termination of an oil and gas lease and (b) reversed the trial court's granting of summary judgment in Cano's favor on plaintiffs' claims of Cano's negligence. The Court of Appeals ordered the case remanded to the 100th Judicial District Court. On March 30, 2009, the plaintiffs filed a motion for rehearing with the Court of Appeals and requested a rehearing on the affirmance of the trial court's holding on the plaintiffs' breach of contract/termination of an oil and gas lease claim. On June 30, 2009, the Court of Appeals ruled to deny the plaintiff's motion for rehearing. On August 17, 2009, Cano filed an appeal with the Texas Supreme Court to request the reversal of the Court of Appeals ruling regarding its potential negligence. On December 11, 2009, the Texas Supreme Court declined to hear Cano's appeal. Therefore, this case will be remanded to the district court for trial on the negligence claims. The case has been set for trial on November 2, 2010.

        Due to the inherent risk of litigation, the ultimate outcome of this case is uncertain and unpredictable. At this time, Cano management continues to believe that this lawsuit is without merit and will continue to vigorously defend itself and its subsidiaries, while seeking cost-effective solutions to

III-22


Table of Contents


resolve this lawsuit. Based on Cano's knowledge and judgment of the facts, Cano believes its financial statements present fairly the effect of actual and anticipated ultimate costs to resolve these matters as of December 31, 2009.

        There is no remaining insurance coverage for any claims associated with this fire litigation.

        On October 2, 2008, a lawsuit (08 CV 8462) was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, against David W. Wehlmann; Gerald W. Haddock; Randall Boyd; Donald W. Niemiec; Robert L. Gaudin; William O. Powell, III and the underwriters of the June 26, 2008 public offering of Cano common stock, which is referred to as the Secondary Offering, alleging violations of the federal securities laws. Messrs. Wehlmann, Haddock, Boyd, Niemiec, Gaudin and Powell were Cano outside directors on June 26, 2008. At the defendants' request, the case was transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (4:09-CV-308-A).

        On July 2, 2009, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint that added as defendants Cano, Cano's Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, Jeff Johnson, Cano's former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Morris B. "Sam" Smith, Cano's current Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Ben Daitch, Cano's Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer, Michael Ricketts and Cano's Senior Vice President of Engineering and Operations, Patrick McKinney, and dismissed Gerald W. Haddock, a former director of Cano, as a defendant. The amended complaint alleges that the prospectus for the Secondary Offering contained statements regarding Cano's proved reserve amounts and standards that were materially false and overstated Cano's proved reserves. The plaintiffs sought to certify the lawsuit as a class action lawsuit; however, the case was dismissed prior to the issue of class certification being addressed. On July 27, 2009, the defendants moved to dismiss the lawsuit. On December 3, 2009, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas granted motions to dismiss all claims brought by the plaintiffs. On December 18, 2009, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. On April 5, 2010, Cano filed its appellate brief in support of its position. On April 19, 2010, the plaintiffs filed their response brief. Due to the inherent risk of litigation, the outcome and the damages, if any of this lawsuit and uncertain and unpredictable; however, Cano, its officers and its outside directors intend to vigorously defend the lawsuit.

        Cano is cooperating with its directors and officers liability insurance carrier regarding the defense of the lawsuit. We believe that the potential amount of losses resulting from this lawsuit in the future, if any, will not exceed the policy limits of Cano's directors' and officers' liability insurance.

        None of Cano's directors, officers or affiliates, owners of record or beneficial owners of more than five percent of any class of Cano's voting securities, or security holder is involved in a proceeding adverse to Cano or its subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to Cano or its subsidiaries.


Employees

        We expect to have approximately 80 employees following the completion of the merger.

Resaca Employees

        As of May 28, 2010, Resaca had approximately 29 employees serving in various capacities. None of Resaca's employees is party to a collective bargaining agreement. Resaca considers its relationship with its employees to be good. In addition to our full-time employees, Resaca hires project labor and staff

III-23


Table of Contents


for its drilling operations from time to time and on an as-needed basis. Contract employees may range from 3 to 5 people for any particular project.

Cano Employees

        As of May 28, 2010, Cano and its wholly-owned subsidiaries had 59 employees, all of whom are full-time employees. None of Cano's employees are represented by a union. Cano has never experienced an interruption in operations from any kind of labor dispute, and Cano considers the working relationships among the members of its staff to be generally good.


Operating Risks and Insurance

        Our operations involve the handling of hazardous materials and explosives and are conducted in a variety of challenging environments. As a result we could become subject to personal injury or real property damage claims. Although we maintain insurance which we consider to be adequate for our needs, our policies may not cover all claims. In addition, under certain circumstances we could become liable for the claims of the employees and agents of our clients injured while onsite during our drilling activities. Such claims may not be covered under the indemnification provisions in our general service agreements.

        We do not carry insurance against certain risks that we could experience, such as business interruption resulting from equipment maintenance or weather delays. We obtain insurance against certain property and personal casualty risks and other risks when such insurance is available and when our management considers it advisable to do so. Our general service agreements require us to have specific amounts of insurance. There can be no assurance, however, that any insurance obtained by us will be adequate to cover any losses or liabilities, or that this insurance will continue to be available or available on terms which are acceptable to us. Liabilities for which we are not insured, or which exceed the policy limits of our applicable insurance, could have a material adverse effect on us.


Regulation

Governmental Regulation

        Our operations are subject to extensive and continually changing regulation affecting the oil and natural gas industry. Many departments and agencies, both federal and state, are authorized by statute to issue, and have issued, rules and regulations binding on the oil and natural gas industry and its individual participants. The failure to comply with such rules and regulations can result in substantial penalties. The regulatory burden on the oil and natural gas industry increases our cost of doing business and, consequently, affects our profitability. We do not believe that we are affected in a significantly different manner by these regulations than are our competitors.

        The production of crude oil and natural gas is subject to regulation under a wide range of state and federal statutes, rules, orders and regulations. State and federal statutes and regulations require permits for drilling operations, drilling bonds and reports concerning operations. Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico, the states in which we own and operate properties, have regulations governing conservation matters, including provisions for the unitization or pooling of oil and natural gas properties, the establishment of maximum rates of production from oil and natural gas wells, the spacing of wells, and the plugging and abandonment of wells and removal of related production equipment. Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico also restrict production to the market demand for crude oil and natural gas. These regulations can limit the amount of oil and natural gas we can produce from our wells, limit the number of wells, or limit the locations at which we can conduct drilling operations. Moreover, each state generally imposes a production or severance tax with respect to production and sales of crude oil, natural gas and gas liquids within its jurisdiction.

III-24


Table of Contents

        On a pro forma combined basis, the combined company's natural gas sales revenue were approximately 19% of our total sales revenue during the year ended June 30, 2009 and approximately 16% of our total sales revenue during the nine months ended March 31, 2010. The interstate transportation and sale for resale of natural gas is subject to federal regulation, including transportation rates and various other matters, by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which we refer to as FERC. Federal wellhead price controls on all domestic natural gas were terminated on January 1, 1993, and none of our natural gas sales prices are currently subject to FERC regulation. We cannot predict the impact of future government regulation on our natural gas operations.

        The combined company anticipates structuring a commercial insurance program for the combined company which resembles the programs that Resaca and Cano have individually maintained, except that limits may be increased as appropriate. The program will include (1) general liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage; (2) automobile liability and physical damage insurance with respect to the combined company's vehicle fleet and for any leased vehicles; (3) workers compensation insurance with respect to the individuals employed by Resaca Operating Company, which we refer to as ROC; (4) property insurance with respect to the combined company's equipment; (5) control of well insurance with respect to certain of the combined company's oil and gas producing properties and (6) Directors and Officers Liability and Employer Liability insurance for the combined company which takes into consideration the combined company's profile as a publicly traded entity in both the U.K. and the United States. Workers compensation insurance for the remaining employees of Resaca is provided by Administaff, our professional employer organization.

        Our operations are subject to numerous stringent and complex laws and regulations at the federal, state and local levels governing the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to human health and environmental protection. These laws and regulations may, among other things, require acquisition of a permit before drilling or development commences, restrict the types, quantities and concentrations of various materials that can be released into the environment in connection with development and production activities, and limit or prohibit construction or drilling activities in certain ecologically sensitive and other protected areas. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations or to obtain or comply with permits may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, imposition of remedial requirements and the imposition of injunctions to force future compliance. Our business and prospects could be adversely affected to the extent laws are enacted or other governmental action is taken that prohibits or restricts our development and production activities or imposes environmental protection requirements that result in increased costs to us or the oil and natural gas industry in general.

        We conduct our development and production activities to comply with all applicable environmental regulations, permits and lease conditions, and we monitor subcontractors for environmental compliance. While we believe our operations conform to those conditions, we remain at risk for inadvertent noncompliance, conditions beyond our control and undetected conditions resulting from activities of prior owners or operators of properties in which we own interests.

        To date, the Resaca and Cano's expenditures to comply with environmental or safety regulations have not been significant and the combined company's are not expected to be significant in the future. However, new regulations, enforcement policies, claims for damages or other events could result in significant future costs.

III-25


Table of Contents

        We are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations intended to promote occupational health and safety. Although all of our wells are drilled by independent subcontractors under our "footage" or "day rate" drilling contracts, we have adopted environmental and safety policies and procedures designed to protect the safety of our own supervisory staff and to monitor all subcontracted operations for compliance with applicable regulatory requirements and lease conditions, including environmental and safety compliance. This program includes regular field inspections of our drill sites and producing wells by members of our operations staff and internal assessments of our compliance procedures. We consider the cost of compliance a manageable and necessary part of our business.

        Our operations on federal, state or Native American oil and natural gas leases are subject to numerous restrictions, including nondiscrimination statutes. Such operations must be conducted pursuant to certain on-site security regulations and other permits and authorizations issued by the Bureau of Land Management, Minerals Management Service and other agencies.

III-26


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF RESACA

        The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with "Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Data," "Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data of Resaca," "Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data of Cano" and the financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this proxy statement. The following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements are dependent upon events, risks and uncertainties that may be outside our control. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, the volatility of oil and gas prices, production timing and volumes, estimates of proved reserves, operating costs and capital expenditures, economic and competitive conditions, regulatory changes and other uncertainties, as well as those factors discussed below and elsewhere in this proxy statement, particularly in "Risk Factors" and "Cautionary Statements Concerning Forward-Looking Statements," all of which are difficult to predict. As a result of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed may not occur.


Overview

Introduction

        Resaca is an independent oil and gas exploitation company headquartered in Houston, Texas. Resaca exploits known, mature, proven and probable low-risk oil and gas reserves, as opposed to generally pursuing exploratory operations. Resaca utilizes existing technology to achieve secondary and tertiary hydrocarbon recovery. Resaca's activities are focused in the Permian Basin of West Texas and southeast New Mexico. In the merger with Cano, Resaca will acquire additional assets in Texas, New Mexico and Oklahoma.

        Resaca was formed in 2006 to exploit a number of oil and gas properties in the Permian Basin of the United States. Resaca's common stock was admitted to trading on the AIM on July 17, 2008.

The Merger

        On September 30, 2009, Cano and Resaca announced that their respective boards of directors had approved the merger agreement that provides for the acquisition of Cano by Resaca. Closing is anticipated before the end of June 2010; however, it is possible that factors outside of either company's control could require us to complete the merger at a later time or not to complete it at all.

        Under the terms of the merger agreement, holders of Cano common stock will receive 2.1 shares (or 0.42 shares after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split) of Resaca common stock for each share of Cano common stock held, and the existing holders of Cano preferred stock will receive one share of preferred stock of Resaca for each share of Cano preferred stock held. The merger is intended to be a tax-free transaction to the Cano stockholders to the extent the Cano common stockholders receive Resaca common stock and the Cano preferred stockholders receive Resaca preferred stock in the merger.

        Consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement is conditioned upon, among other things, (1) approval of the holders of the Cano common stock and Cano preferred stock, (2) approval of the holders of Resaca common stock, (3) the listing of Resaca common stock on the NYSE Amex, (4) the refinancing of existing bank debt of Resaca and Cano, (5) the receipt of required regulatory approvals, (6) Resaca's application for readmission to the AIM, which is anticipated to occur simultaneous with the closing of the merger, (7) the effectiveness of a registration statement relating to the shares of Resaca common stock to be issued in the merger, and (8) the approval of the Incentive Plan Amendment by the holders of Resaca common stock. The merger agreement contains certain termination rights for each of Cano and Resaca, including the right to terminate the merger agreement

III-27


Table of Contents


to enter into a Superior Proposal (as such term is defined in the merger agreement). In the event of a termination of the merger agreement under certain specified circumstances described in the merger agreement, one party will be required to pay the other party a termination fee of $3.5 million.

        Cano entered into stock voting agreements with 75% of the holders of Cano's preferred stock on various dates between September and November 2009. Each stock voting agreement contains the same terms and provides, among other things, that each of the preferred holders will vote all its shares of stock (a) in favor of an amendment to the Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock of Cano, which we refer to as the Series D Amendment, (b) in favor of adoption of the merger agreement, and (c) in accordance with the recommendation of our Board of Directors in connection with any Target Acquisition Proposal (as such term is defined in the merger agreement). The Series D Amendment generally provides that the holders of Cano preferred stock shall have no rights arising from the merger with Resaca (including any right to require us to redeem their shares of Cano preferred stock) other than the right to receive the merger consideration specified in the merger agreement. To be effective, the Series D Amendment must be approved by the holders of a majority of the shares of Cano preferred stock, voting as a separate class, and by the holders of a majority of the shares of Cano common stock, voting as a separate class, and then filed by us with the Secretary of State of Delaware.

The Combined Company

        Due to Resaca's and Cano's complementary asset bases and similar strategic focus, Resaca believes that the combined company will benefit from (i) balancing Resaca's near-term growth opportunities with Cano's longer-term development opportunities, (ii) capitalizing on significant cost savings and efficiencies through operational and administrative synergies in the range of $4.5 million to $5.0 million per year, (iii) increasing near-term production by the sharing of engineering expertise among Resaca and Cano management and staff, (iv) optimizing our larger and more diverse portfolio of combined assets, and (v) expanding our access to capital because of the combined company's increased size.

        Resaca and Cano's estimated combined June 30, 2009 proved reserves of 63.3 MMBOE, included 10.1 MMBOE of PDP, 8.0 MMBOE of PDNP, and 45.2 MMBOE of PUD. Reserves were estimated using NYMEX, crude oil and natural gas prices and production and development costs in effect on June 30, 2009. NYMEX crude oil price used in the estimation of Resaca's and Cano's reserves was $69.89 per barrel. NYMEX natural gas prices used in the estimation of Resaca's and Cano's reserves were $3.84 per MMBtu and $3.71 per MMBtu, respectively. The values reported may not necessarily reflect the fair market value of the reserves. For a more detailed description of the combined company's reserves, please read "Business and Properties—Combined Company Production, Estimated Proved Reserves and Acreage" beginning on page III-12 of this proxy statement.

        Resaca and Cano's properties are contained in eight primary field complexes and a group of minor fields in Texas, New Mexico and Oklahoma and consist of approximately 75,000 gross and 73,000 net acres. At May 28, 2010, on a pro forma combined basis, we operated approximately 1,904 active wells, including 1,501 producing wells, 391 waterflood injection wells, and 12 salt water disposal wells. For the month ended April 30, 2010, on a pro forma combined basis, we produced an average of 1,923 net BOE per day from over 25 separate formations, which was composed of approximately 76% oil and approximately 24% natural gas. Nearly all of Resaca and Cano's production is from relatively shallow formations.

        Resaca and Cano's exploitation plan involves the reactivation of shut-in wells, recompletion of currently producing wells, including refracturing, implementation of new waterfloods, reactivation and optimization of existing waterfloods and an infill drilling program. Resaca believes the combined properties contain many opportunities for the development of low risk oil and gas reserves and many of

III-28


Table of Contents


the properties are candidates for tertiary recovery by CO2 flooding based on reports and studies performed on these properties.

        For the year ended June 30, 2009, Resaca and Cano generated pro forma combined operating revenues of $43.1 million and pro forma combined net income of $25.8 million. For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Resaca and Cano generated pro forma combined operating revenues of $28.7 million and pro forma combined net loss of $17.9 million.

        The following table shows selected data concerning our combined production, estimated proved reserves and acreage for the periods indicated on a proforma combined basis:

Field
  April 2010
Average Daily
Production
(BOE)
  Total Est. Proved
Reserves
MMBOE
(As of June 30,
2009)(1)
  Percent of
Total Est. Proved
Reserves
MMBOE
  PV-10 (As of
June 30,
2009)
(In Millions)(1)
  Gross Acres
(As of
May 28,
2010)(2)
  Net Acres
(As of
May 28,
2010)(3)
 

Texas Properties

                                     

Panhandle Properties

    563     28.9     45.7 % $ 323.9     20,387     20,387  

Penwell Properties

    155     1.7     2.7 %   19.8     3,120     3,120  

Desdemona Properties

    78     1.4     2.2 %   7.1     11,264     11,264  

Grand Clearfork Unit Properties

    46     0.5     0.8 %   4.6     1,120     1,120  

Other Minor Properties

    153     2.0     3.1 %   31.4     7,890     7,823  

New Mexico Properties

                                     

Cato Properties

    254     16.0     25.3 %   116.5     21,122     20,662  

Cooper Jal Unit Properties

    364     9.8     15.5 %   134.8     2,560     1,855  

Other Minor Properties

    7     0.2     0.3 %   2.6     320     240  

Oklahoma Properties

                                     

Nowata Properties

    223     1.5     2.4 %   13.9     4,594     4,594  

Davenport Properties

    80     1.3     2.0 %   9.9     2,178     2,178  
                           
 

Total

    1,923     63.3     100.0 % $ 664.5     74,555     73,243  

(1)
PV-10 is a non-GAAP financial measure and generally differs from the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, because it does not include the effects of income taxes on future net revenues. At June 30, 2009, our standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows was $418.2 million on a combined basis as shown in "Business and Properties—Combined Company Production, Estimated Proved Reserves and Acreage" beginning on page III-12.

(2)
"Gross" acres refers to acreage in which we have a working interest.

(3)
"Net" acres refers to the aggregate of our percentage working interest in gross acreage before royalties or other payouts, as appropriate.

Realized Commodity Prices

        Resaca and Cano market oil, NGLs and gas production to a variety of purchasers and the values received are typically based on regional pricing. The relative prices of oil, NGLs and gas are determined by factors impacting global and regional supply and demand dynamics, such as economic conditions, production and storage levels, weather cycles and other events. In addition, relative prices are heavily influenced by product quality and location relative to consuming and refining markets.

III-29


Table of Contents

        The NYMEX futures price of crude oil is a widely used benchmark in the pricing of domestic and imported oil in the United States. The actual prices realized by us from the sale of oil differ from the quoted NYMEX price as a result of quality and location differentials.

        Quality differentials result from the fact that oils differ from one another due to their different molecular makeup which plays an important part in their refining and subsequent sale as petroleum products. Among other things, there are two characteristics that commonly drive quality differentials: (1) the oil's American Petroleum Institute gravity, which we refer to as API gravity, and (2) the oil's percentage of sulfur content by weight. In general, lighter oil (with higher API gravity) produces more lighter products, such as gasoline, at a lower refining cost than the heavier oil. The higher light product yield at a lower refining cost results in a higher market price for the lighter oils versus the heavier oils. Oil with low sulfur content ("sweet" crude oil) is less expensive to refine and, as a result, normally sells at a higher price than the high sulfur-content oil ("sour" crude oil).

        Location differentials result from variances in transportation costs based on the produced oil's type of transportation (truck or pipeline) and proximity to the major refining centers and consumer markets to which it is ultimately delivered. Oil that is produced closer to these major centers and markets incurs lower transportation costs as compared to oil that is produced further from such centers and markets and, consequently, realizes a higher price (i.e., a lower location differential to NYMEX).

        The oil produced from our properties is generally a mid average API gravity with a sour crude adjustment and approximately half is trucked to pipeline receiving stations and half is delivered directly into crude oil pipelines.

        Raw natural gas produced in conjunction with crude oil is infused with NGLs and is typically referred to as "wet gas." Wet gas is generally sold at the wellhead and transported by the purchaser to a gas processing and conditioning plant where the NGLs and other impurities are separated from the wet gas leaving a dry pipeline quality residue gas which is delivered and sold directly into a pipeline at the plant tailgate. The NGLs are typically transported from the gas processing plant by pipeline for further fractionation at Mont Belvieu, Texas which is strategically located near the Houston ship channel petro-chemical and refining complex.

        NGLs are generally composed of five marketable components, which, ordered from lightest to heaviest, are: (1) ethane, (2) propane, (3) isobutane, (4) normal butane and (5) normal gasoline. Once fractionated, these components are used as feedstocks in the petro-chemical business and as additives in gasoline blends. The heavier liquid components normally realize higher prices than the lighter components.

        Virtually all of our wellhead gas production is sent through a gas processing plant. The NGLs recovered from the processing of our wet gas are sold at Mont Belvieu posted prices for each fractionated liquid component product. A portion of our NGL and dry gas residue value is retained by the gas processing plants as compensation for gathering and processing our wet gas into the NGL and dry gas residue components, which is commonly referred to as a percent of proceeds arrangement. Our realized NGL price is generally correlated with the NYMEX oil price. Our NGL differential primarily takes into account the relative liquid component mix, the discount that NGLs sell relative to oil and the effects of the NGL value deduction retained by the gas processing plants under our contracts.

III-30


Table of Contents

        The NYMEX price of gas is a widely used benchmark for the pricing of gas in the United States. Similar to oil, the actual prices realized from the sale of gas differ from the quoted NYMEX price as a result of quality and location differentials.

        Wet gas with a high Btu content typically sells at a premium to low Btu content wet gas because high Btu content wet gas yields a greater quantity of NGLs. Gas with low sulfur content sells at a premium to high sulfur content gas because the cost to extract the sulfur from the gas and render it marketable exceeds the market value of the recovered sulfur.

        Location differentials to NYMEX prices result from variances in transportation costs based on the gas' proximity to major consuming markets to which it is ultimately delivered. Also affecting the differential are the effects of the dry gas value deduction retained by the gas processing plant. The dry gas residue is generally sold based on index prices in the region. Generally, these index prices have historically been at a discount to NYMEX gas prices.

        Resaca and Cano have entered into and plan to continue entering into derivative instruments to mitigate the impact of commodity price volatility on our cash flow from operations. For an explanation of the derivative instruments we have entered into to manage exposure to volatility of commodity market prices, please read "—The Combined Company's Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk."

        Production costs are the costs incurred in the operation of producing and processing our production and are primarily comprised of lease operating expense, workover costs and production and ad valorem taxes. In general, lease operating expense and workover costs represent the components of production costs over which we have management control, while production taxes and ad valorem taxes are directly related to changes in commodity prices. Additionally, certain components of lease operating expense are impacted by energy and field services prices. For example, Resaca and Cano incur power costs in connection with various production related activities such as pumping to recover oil and gas, injecting water in the water floods and separation and treatment of water produced in connection with our production. Although these costs are highly correlated with production volumes, they are influenced not only by production volumes but also by utility rates, inflation of field services costs and volumes of water produced. Certain items, however, such as direct labor and materials and supplies, generally remain relatively fixed across broad production volume ranges, but can fluctuate depending on activities performed during a specific period. For instance, repairs to Resaca and Cano pumping water equipment, injection pumps or surface facilities result in increased expenses in periods during which they are performed.

        Every state regulates the development, production, gathering and sale of oil and gas, including imposing production taxes and requirements for obtaining drilling permits. In general, each state imposes a production tax on the underlying value of the oil, NGLs and gas.

Outlook

        Significant factors that may impact future commodity prices include (i) developments in issues currently impacting Venezuela, Iraq, Iran and the Middle East in general, (ii) the extent to which members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and other oil exporting nations are able to continue to manage oil supply through export quotas and (iii) overall North American gas supply and demand fundamentals, including the impact of increasing liquefied natural gas deliveries to

III-31


Table of Contents


the United States. Although Resaca cannot predict the occurrence of events that will affect future commodity prices or the degree to which these prices will be affected, the prices for any commodity that we produce will generally approximate market prices in the geographic region of the production.

        In order to address, in part, volatility in commodity prices, Resaca and Cano have implemented a commodity price risk management program that is intended to reduce the volatility in our revenues and support our New Facility. Accordingly, Resaca has adopted a policy that contemplates hedging oil and gas prices for approximately 75-80% of our PDP production for three to five years. Implementation of this policy will mitigate, but will not eliminate, Resaca's sensitivity to short-term changes in commodity prices.

CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery

        Resaca's Cooper Jal, Penwell and Grand Clearfork Unit Properties were originally developed in the mid 1950s, with development and waterflood initiation continuing until the mid 1970s, at a time of significantly lower oil and natural gas prices and prior to the availability of current completion and fracturing techniques and the development of technologies which greatly enhance the exploitation of proved reserves. In addition to Resaca's other exploitation opportunities, Resaca believes these properties are excellent candidates for tertiary recovery by CO2 flooding based on reports and studies on these properties. The use of CO2 for this type of enhanced recovery has revitalized many older proven oil producing fields in the Permian Basin. Several major companies are operating CO2 floods in the region and some of our properties were identified in a report dated February 2006 prepared by Advanced Resources International for the U.S. Department of Energy entitled "Basin Oriented Strategies for CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery: Permian Basin" as being amenable to CO2 enhanced oil recovery. Furthermore, many of our properties are located near existing CO2 pipelines.

Merger Related Cost Savings

        Resaca expects to reduce combined general and administrative expenses and lease operating expense, which we refer to as LOE, by approximately $4.5 to 5.0 million per year as compared to Resaca's and Cano's combined fiscal year 2009 general and administrative expenses and LOE as a result of the merger, exclusive of share based compensation, transaction, and litigation costs. These reductions in costs include:

Resaca Historical Financial Data

Results of Operations

Year Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to Year Ended June 30, 2008

        Income.    Total income increased $19.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2009 when compared to the year ended June 30, 2008. The increase was primarily attributable to a $23.8 million change in the unrealized value of Resaca's oil and gas hedges from a loss of $12.3 million in the prior year to a gain of $11.5 million in the current fiscal year. This increase was offset by a $4.4 million decrease in oil and

III-32


Table of Contents

gas revenues to $14.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2009 due primarily to lower oil and gas prices.

        Costs and Expenses.    Total costs and expenses decreased $0.7 million to $23 million for the year ended June 30, 2009 when compared to the year ended June 30, 2008. This $0.7 million decrease was primarily attributable to the following:

Year Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to Year Ended June 30, 2007

        Income.    Total income decreased $8.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2008 when compared to the year ended June 30, 2007. The decrease was primarily attributable to a $11.4 million decline in the unrealized value of Resaca oil and gas hedges from a loss of $0.9 million in 2007 to a loss of $12.3 million in the 2008 fiscal year. This decrease was offset by a $3.1 million increase in oil and gas revenues to $18.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2008 due primarily to higher oil and gas prices.

        Costs and Expenses.    Total costs and expenses increased $0.7 million to $23.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2008 when compared to the year ended June 30, 2007. This $0.7 million decrease was primarily attributable to the following:

III-33


Table of Contents

Three Months and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to Three Months and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2009

        Income:    Total income of $4.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $3.0 million higher as compared to total income of $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to a $1.8 million increase in unrealized gain (loss) on Resaca's oil and gas hedges. In addition, there was a $1.2 million increase in oil and gas revenues due primarily to higher oil and gas prices, which increased oil and gas revenues from $2.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 to $3.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010.

        Total income of $10.3 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 was $16.6 million lower as compared to total income of $26.9 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. The decrease was primarily attributable to a $16.6 million decrease in unrealized gain (loss) on Resaca's oil and gas hedges.

        Costs and Expenses:    Total costs and expenses increased $0.1 million from $5.2 million to $5.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009. This $0.1 million increase was comprised primarily of the following:

        Total costs and expenses increased $0.2 million from $16.8 million to $17.0 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 when compared to the nine months ended March 31, 2009. This $0.2 million increase was comprised primarily of the following:

III-34


Table of Contents

Crude Oil and Natural Gas Prices and Derivatives

        The average prices Resaca receives for crude oil sales are generally at market prices received at the wellhead, which are generally based on West Texas Sour, which Resaca refers to as WTS, prices and are adjusted for quality and transportation charges. The average prices Resaca receives for natural gas sales are approximately the market price received at the wellhead, which are generally based on Waha Natural Gas Hub, which Resaca refers to as Waha, prices and are adjusted for the value of natural gas liquids, less transportation and marketing expenses. Resaca has commodity derivatives in place that provide for $58.00 to $60.00 WTS crude oil "floor prices" and $5.50 to $6.30 Waha natural gas "floor prices." If WTS crude oil or Waha natural gas prices are lower than the "floor prices," Resaca will be paid by its counterparty for the difference between the WTS or Waha price, as the case may be, and the "floor price." Resaca's derivatives also include $66.30 to $77.00 WTS crude oil "ceiling prices" and $6.10 to $11.50 Waha natural gas "ceiling prices." If WTS crude oil or Waha natural gas prices are higher than the "ceiling prices," Resaca will pay its counterparty for the difference between the WTS or Waha price, as the case may be, and such "ceiling price."

        For the 2009 fiscal year, Resaca recorded an unrealized gain on derivatives of $11.5 million as compared to unrealized losses of $12.3 million and $0.9 million for the 2008 and 2007 fiscal years, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, Resaca recorded an unrealized gain of $0.8 million and an unrealized loss of $1.0 million, respectively. For the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, Resaca recorded an unrealized loss of $0.8 million and an unrealized gain of $15.8 million, respectively.

        The unrealized gains for fiscal year 2009 and the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 reflect the fair value of the commodity derivatives as of June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2010, respectively. By their nature, these commodity derivatives can have a highly volatile impact on our earnings. At June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2010, a five percent change in the prices for Resaca's commodity derivative instruments would have impacted its pre-tax earnings by approximately $1.0 million and $0.9 million, respectively.

        Resaca includes realized gains and losses from derivative settlements in oil and gas revenues. Resaca recorded realized losses from derivative settlements of $0.4 million and $3.2 million for fiscal years 2009 and 2008, respectively, and a realized gain of $0.4 million for fiscal year 2007. Resaca recorded a $0.3 million realized loss and a $0.7 million realized gain from derivative settlements for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Resaca recorded a loss of $0.2 million and $0.7 million from derivative settlements for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Cash Flow Activity

Year Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to Year Ended June 30, 2008

        Operating Activities.    Cash flows from operating activities decreased $5.7 from $1.7 for the year ended June 30, 2008 to $(4.0) million for the year ended June 30, 2009. Net income adjusted for non

III-35


Table of Contents

cash transactions increased $1.7 million from $(1.6) million in the prior year to $0.1 million in the current period. This increase was offset by a $4.0 million decrease in net working capital.

        Investing Activities.    Cash flows used in investing activities increased by $16.0 million to $20.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2009 from $4.5 million in the prior year. The increase was primarily due to investments of $20.0 million in Resaca's oil and gas properties.

        Financing Activities.    Cash flows provided by financing activities increased $22.2 million to $24.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2009 from $2.4 million during the year ended June 30, 2008. The increase was primarily due to $74.9 million in net proceeds from Resaca's initial public offering, offset by $44.3 million and $15.0 million used to paydown Tranche A and Tranche B, respectively, of Resaca's credit facility.

Year Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to Year Ended June 30, 2007

        Operating Activities.    Cash flows from operating activities increased $4.5 million from $(2.8) million for the year ended June 30, 2007 to $1.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2008. Net income adjusted for non cash transactions increased $2.4 million to $(1.6) million in the current year from $(4.0) million in the prior year. This addition was offset by a $3.3 million increase in net working capital.

        Investing Activities.    Cash flows used in investing activities decreased by $9.2 million to $4.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2008 from $13.7 million in the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction in investments of $9.3 million in Resaca's oil and gas properties.

        Financing Activities.    Cash flows provided by financing activities decreased $13.8 million to $2.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2008. Cash flows provided by financing activities were $16.2 million during the year ended June 30, 2007. The decrease was due to reduced borrowings of $13.8 million on Resaca's credit facility in the 2008 fiscal year.

Nine Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to Nine Months Ended March 31, 2009

        Operating Activities:    Cash flows provided by operating activities increased $5.5 million from $(5.1) million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 to $0.4 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010. Net income adjusted for non cash transactions increased $0.2 million from $0.3 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 to $0.5 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010. Working capital decreased by $0.1 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to a $5.4 million decrease for the nine months ended March 31, 2009.

        Investing Activities:    Cash flows used in investing activities decreased by $16.0 million from $19.2 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 to $3.2 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction of Resaca's investment in its oil and gas properties related to a curtailment of Resaca's infill drilling with respect to the Cooper Jal Properties.

        Financing Activities:    Cash flows provided by financing activities decreased $22.5 million from $25.6 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 to $3.1 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to $74.9 million being provided by Resaca's initial public offering offset by $44.3 million and $15.0 million used to paydown Tranche A and Tranche B, respectively, of Resaca's credit facility in July 2008 offset by proceeds from borrowings on senior debt of $10.0 million.

III-36


Table of Contents

Cano Historical Financial Data

Results of Operations

Year Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to Year Ended June 30, 2008

        For the 2009 fiscal year, Cano had income applicable to Cano common stock of $7.9 million, which was a $29.5 million improvement as compared to the $21.6 million loss applicable to Cano common stock for the 2008 fiscal year. Items that led to the improvement were increased gain on derivatives of $75.7 million, Cano preferred stock repurchased for less than the carrying amount of $10.9 million, higher income from discontinued operations of $8.0 million and lower Cano preferred stock dividend of $1.4 million. These positive factors were partially offset by higher operating expenses of $49.7 million, lower operating revenues of $9.2 million, lower deferred income tax benefit of $7.1 million and goodwill impairment of $0.7 million.

Operating Revenues

        The table below summarizes Cano's operating revenues for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.

 
  Year Ended June 30,   Increase (Decrease)  
 
  2009   2008   2009 v. 2008  

Operating Revenues (In Thousands)

  $ 25,409   $ 34,650   $ (9,241 )

Sales:

                   
 

Crude Oil (MBbls)

    309     249     60  
 

Natural Gas (MMcf)

    776     908     (132 )
 

MBOE

    438     401     37  

Average Realized Price

                   
 

Crude Oil ($/Bbl)

  $ 62.17   $ 94.08   $ (31.91 )
 

Natural Gas ($/Mcf)

  $ 7.57   $ 11.99   $ (4.42 )

Operating Revenues and Commodity

                   
 

Derivative Settlements (In Thousands)

  $ 32,299   $ 32,065   $ 234  

Average Adjusted Price (includes Commodity derivative settlements)

                   
 

Crude Oil ($/Bbl)

  $ 75.84   $ 81.92   $ (6.08 )
 

Natural Gas ($/Mcf)

  $ 10.23   $ 12.48   $ (2.25 )

        The 2009 fiscal year operating revenues of $25.4 million were $9.2 million lower as compared to the 2008 fiscal year operating revenues of $34.7 million. The $9.2 million reduction is primarily attributable to lower prices received for crude oil and natural gas sales, which lowered revenues by $8.0 million and $4.0 million, respectively, and by lower natural gas sales volumes, which lowered revenues by $1.0 million. These decreases were partially offset by increased crude oil sales volumes, which increased revenues by $3.7 million.

        The impact of lower prices for crude oil and natural gas sales, as discussed above, is partially mitigated by commodity derivative settlements received during the 2009 fiscal year as presented in the preceding table. As discussed in Note 7 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements, if crude oil and natural gas NYMEX prices are lower than derivative floor prices, Cano will be reimbursed by our counterparty for the difference between the NYMEX price and floor price (i.e. realized gain). Conversely, if crude oil and natural gas NYMEX prices are higher than the derivative ceiling prices, Cano will pay its counterparty for the difference between the NYMEX price and ceiling price (i.e. realized loss).

III-37


Table of Contents

        Crude Oil Sales.    For the 2009 fiscal year, approximately 82% of the increased crude oil sales of 60 MBbls were attributed to development activity at the Cato Properties. Also, Cano had increased crude oil sales from the Panhandle Properties due to development activity.

        Natural Gas Sales.    For the 2009 fiscal year, the overall decrease in natural gas sales of 132 MMcf pertains primarily to reductions with respect to Cano's Barnett Shale project at our Desdemona Properties. During the first half of calendar year 2008, various workovers and re-fracture stimulations were attempted to increase production. Through December 2008, these efforts were met with marginal success. In January 2009, Cano halted its workover program in the Desdemona Properties—Barnett Shale. Once the workover activity ceased, Cano experienced normal Barnett Shale annual production declines of approximately 65-90%. In July 2009, Cano shut-in its Barnett Shale natural gas wells and, based upon the current and near-term outlook of natural gas prices, Cano has no plans to return these wells to production in the foreseeable future.

        Also, higher gas production from the Cato Properties due to the aforementioned development activity was offset by lower gas production from Cano's Panhandle Properties due to normal field decline of approximately 10% annually and temporary pipeline curtailments of gas deliveries by its gas purchasers.

        Crude Oil and Natural Gas Prices.    The average price Cano receives for crude oil sales is generally at market prices received at the wellhead, except for the Cato Properties, for which Cano receives below market prices due to the levels of impurities in the oil. Differentials gapped briefly as commodity prices rapidly declined between July 2008 and December 2008; however, the differentials have since recovered with the higher crude oil prices. The average price Cano receives for natural gas sales is approximately the market price received at the wellhead, adjusted for the value of natural gas liquids, less transportation and marketing expenses. As discussed in Note 7 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements, Cano has commodity derivatives in place that provide for $80.00 to $85.00 crude oil "floor prices" and $7.75 to $8.00 natural gas "floor prices." If crude oil and natural gas NYMEX prices are lower than the "floor prices," Cano will be reimbursed by its counterparty for the difference between the NYMEX price and such "floor price."

Operating Expenses

        For the 2009 fiscal year, Cano's total operating expenses were $84.4 million, or $49.7 million higher than the 2008 fiscal year of $34.7 million. The primary contributors to the increase were an impairment of long-lived assets of $26.7 million and exploration expense of $11.4 million associated with the Desdemona Properties—Duke Sands waterflood project. In addition, Cano experienced increased lease operating expenses of $5.6 million, general and administrative of $4.3 million and higher depletion and depreciation of $1.8 million.

Lease Operating Expenses

        Cano's LOE consists of the costs of producing crude oil and natural gas such as labor, supplies, repairs, maintenance, workovers and utilities.

        For the 2009 fiscal year, our LOE was $18.8 million, which is $5.5 million higher than 2008 fiscal year of $13.3 million. The $5.5 million increase resulted primarily from increased workover activities and general repairs at the Panhandle Properties of $4.2 million and higher operating expenses incurred at the Cato Properties of $2.1 million to support increased crude oil and natural gas sales, as discussed under "—Operating Revenues," partially offset by lower operating expenses of $1.1 million due to lower natural gas sales at the Desdemona Properties, as discussed under "—Operating Revenues." Cano also had higher LOE at the Davenport and Nowata Properties of $0.3 million due to increased electricity expenses, general repairs and workover expenses. The workover activities at the Panhandle

III-38


Table of Contents


Properties pertained to returning wells to production and have increased production, as discussed under "—Operating Revenues," and are expected to result in increased production in future months.

        For the 2009 fiscal year, our LOE per BOE, based on production, was $41.28 as compared to $32.69 for the 2008 fiscal year. In general, secondary and tertiary LOE is higher than the LOE for companies developing primary production because Cano's fields are more mature and typically produce less oil and more water. Cano expects the LOE to decrease during the 2010 fiscal year as Cano realizes the benefit of a full year of lower service rates with vendors, and Cano expects LOE per BOE to decrease as production increases from the waterflood and EOR development activities Cano has implemented and are implementing. Cano did experience decreases in our LOE per BOE during the 2009 fiscal year as the LOE per BOE for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $37.75, which is lower than the $44.84 LOE per BOE for the six months ended December 31, 2008.

        For the 2008 fiscal year, Cano's LOE was $13.3 million, which is $4.6 million higher as compared to the 2007 fiscal year LOE of $8.7 million. Cano incurred higher LOE due to the inclusion of the Cato Properties of $0.8 million, increased lifting costs at the Desdemona Properties of $1.7 million, increased workover rig expenses at the Panhandle and Pantwist Properties of $1.6 million and increased electricity expense of $0.7 million. Other factors contributing to higher LOE were increased crude oil and natural gas sales, as discussed under "—Operating Revenues," and generally higher costs for goods and services. Our LOE for the 2008 fiscal year included a full year of Cato Properties' operating results versus three months in the 2007 fiscal year. Our LOE per BOE has increased from $23.47 during the 2007 fiscal year to $32.69 for the 2008 fiscal year, for the reasons previously discussed.

Production and Ad Valorem Taxes

        For the 2009 fiscal year, Cano's production and ad valorem taxes were $2.4 million, which is $0.1 million lower than the 2008 fiscal year of $2.5 million. Cano's production taxes were lower by $0.6 million due to lower operating revenues and were partially offset by increased ad valorem taxes of $0.5 million. The increased ad valorem taxes were due to notification of revisions in tax property valuations by taxing authorities for the 2008 calendar year. Therefore, the 2009 fiscal year includes higher tax rates for the twelve months plus a charge for applying the rates to the first six months of the 2008 calendar year. Cano's production taxes as a percent of operating revenues for the 2009 fiscal year of 6.5% was comparable to the 2008 fiscal years of 6.7%. Cano anticipates the 2010 fiscal year to be subject to similar production tax rates.

        For the 2008 fiscal year, Cano's production and ad valorem taxes were $2.5 million, which is $0.8 million higher than the 2007 fiscal year of $1.7 million. The $0.8 million increase is attributable to higher operating revenues, as previously discussed.

General and Administrative Expenses

        Cano's general and administrative, which it refers to as G&A, expenses consist of support services for its operating activities and investor relations costs.

        For the 2009 fiscal year, Cano's G&A expenses totaled $19.2 million, which is $4.3 million higher than fiscal year 2008 of $14.9 million. The primary contributors to the $4.3 million increase were higher litigation costs of $4.4 million pertaining to the settlement costs and legal fees pertaining of the fire litigation as discussed in Note 17 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements and increased stock compensation expense of $0.2 million partially offset by reduced payroll expense of $0.3 million. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, Cano took steps to reduce its payroll, eliminating 25% of its home office staff. The quarter ended June 30, 2009 was the first time Cano realized these savings.

        Since Cano has settled all fire litigation claims except for one lawsuit, as discussed in Note 17 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements, Cano expects significant decreases in future quarters' legal expenses. Also, the previously discussed workforce reductions are expected to reduce payroll and benefits costs by $0.8 million annually.

III-39


Table of Contents

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

        During the 2009 fiscal year, Cano recorded a $26.7 million impairment on its Barnett Shale Properties. As discussed in Note 14 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements, the decline in commodity prices created an uncertainty in the likelihood of developing its reserves associated with Cano's Barnett Shale natural gas properties within the next five years. Therefore, during the quarter ended December 31, 2008, Cano recorded a $22.4 million pre-tax impairment to its Barnett Shale Properties. During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, Cano recorded an additional $4.3 million pre-tax impairment to its Barnett Shale Properties as the forward outlook for natural gas prices continued to decline and Cano shut-in its Barnett Shale natural gas wells. The fair value was determined using estimates of future production volumes, prices and operating expenses, discounted to a present value.

Exploration Expense

        During the 2009 fiscal year, Cano recorded exploration expense of $11.4 million pertaining to the Duke Sands waterflood project. The primary source of water for this waterflood project had been derived from its Barnett Shale wells. Since Cano has shut-in its Barnett Shale natural gas production due to uneconomic natural gas commodity prices, as previously discussed, Cano no longer has an economic source of water to continue flooding the Duke Sands. Therefore, its rate of water injection has been reduced to a point where Cano cannot consider the waterflood active. Cano continues to believe that this reservoir is an excellent secondary and tertiary recovery candidate; however, Cano does not have current plans to recommence injection for the foreseeable future.

Depletion and Depreciation

        For the 2009 fiscal year, Cano's depletion and depreciation expense was $5.7 million, an increase of $1.8 million as compared to the 2008 fiscal year depletion and depreciation expense of $3.9 million. This includes depletion expense pertaining to Cano's oil and natural gas properties, and depreciation expense pertaining to Cano's field operations vehicles and equipment, natural gas plant, office furniture and computers. The increase is due to increased crude oil and natural gas sales volumes (net) as previously discussed under "—Operating Revenues" and higher per BOE depletion rates. For the 2009 fiscal year, Cano's depletion rate pertaining to its oil and gas properties was $11.85 per BOE, as compared to the 2008 fiscal year rate of $8.90 per BOE. The increased depletion rates resulted from higher depletion rates for Cano's Cato and Panhandle Properties based on our reserve redetermination at June 30, 2009 and periodic reassessments of depletion rates during the 2009 fiscal year.

Interest Expense and Other

        For the 2009 and 2008 fiscal years, Cano incurred interest expense of $0.5 million and $0.8 million, as a direct result of the credit agreements Cano entered into, as discussed in Note 6 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements. The interest expense for the 2009 and 2008 fiscal years was reduced by $1.4 million and $2.5 million, for interest cost that was capitalized to the waterflood and ASP projects. Cano incurred higher interest costs during the 2008 fiscal year due to higher outstanding debt balances and higher interest rates.

Gain (Loss) on Commodity Derivatives

        As discussed in Note 7 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements, Cano has entered into financial contracts for its commodity derivatives and an interest rate swap arrangement. For the 2009 fiscal year, Cano recorded a gain on derivatives of $43.8 million as compared to losses of $32.0 million and $0.8 million for the 2008 and 2007 fiscal years, respectively. The 2009 fiscal year gain consisted of an unrealized gain of $36.9 million, a realized gain on settlements of commodity derivative contracts of $6.2 million and a $0.7 million realized gain on the sale of floor-priced contracts.

III-40


Table of Contents

        For the realization of settlements, if crude oil and natural gas NYMEX prices are lower than the floor prices, Cano will be reimbursed by its counterparty for the difference between the NYMEX price and floor price (i.e. realized gain). Conversely, if crude oil and natural gas NYMEX prices are higher than the ceiling prices, Cano will pay its counterparty for the difference between the NYMEX price and such ceiling price (i.e. realized loss).

        The unrealized gain for the 2009 fiscal year reflects the fair value of the commodity derivatives as of June 30, 2009. By their nature, these commodity derivatives can have a highly volatile impact on Cano's earnings. A five percent change in the prices for its commodity derivative instruments could impact our pre-tax earnings by approximately $1.8 million.

Income Tax Benefit (Expense)

        For the 2009 fiscal year, Cano had income tax expense of $1.7 million, as compared to an income tax benefit for the 2008 fiscal year of $9.8 million. These tax amounts included taxes related to discontinued operations as shown in Note 8 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements. The increased income taxes for the 2009 fiscal year, as compared to the 2008 fiscal year, is due to the increase in taxable income and an increase in the state tax rate and other permanent items, as presented in Note 16 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements, resulting in an aggregate rate of 107.4%. The income tax rates for the 2008 fiscal year was 35.9% for such year.

Income from Discontinued Operations

        For the 2009 and 2008 fiscal years, Cano had income from discontinued operations of $11.5 million and $3.5 million, respectively, due to its divestitures of Pantwist, LLC, the Corsicana Properties and the Rich Valley Properties, as discussed in Note 8 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements.

Cano Preferred Stock Dividend

        The Cano preferred stock dividend for the 2009 fiscal year of $2.7 million was a decrease of $1.4 million from $4.1 million for 2008 fiscal year. This resulted from the November and December 2008 repurchases of Cano preferred stock as discussed in Note 5 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements. Due to the repurchases, Cano's quarterly preferred stock dividends will be approximately $0.5 million per quarter of which 59% will be paid in the form of additional Cano preferred stock, with the remaining balance paid in cash. Also, the 2008 fiscal year amount includes $0.5 million of federal tax Cano was required to withhold in accordance with Internal Revenue Service regulations from September 2006 through June 2008. These amounts did not have a material effect to its prior period financial statements. Due to the previously discussed repurchases, Cano no longer has any Cano preferred stock that required withholding taxes.

Year Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to Year Ended June 30, 2007

        For the 2008 fiscal year, Cano had a loss applicable to Cano common stock of $21.6 million, which was $17.6 million greater than the $4.0 million loss applicable to Cano common stock incurred for the year ended June 30, 2007. Increased revenues of $14.0 million, increased deferred tax benefit of $8.8 million and lower interest expense of $0.9 million were more than offset by higher loss on commodity derivatives of $31.1 million, higher operating expenses of $8.3 million, lower income from discontinued operations of $1.0 million and increased Cano preferred stock dividend of $0.9 million.

III-41


Table of Contents

Operating Revenues

        The table below summarizes Cano's operating revenues for the years ended June 30, 2008, and 2007.

 
  Year Ended June 30,   Increase (Decrease)  
 
  2008   2007   2008 v. 2007  

Operating Revenues (In Thousands)

  $ 34,650   $ 20,651   $ 13,999  

Sales:

                   
 

Crude Oil (MBbls)

    249     223     26  
 

Natural Gas (MMcf)

    908     824     84  
 

MBOE

    401     360     41  

Average Realized Price

                   
 

Crude Oil ($/Bbl)

  $ 94.08   $ 61.96   $ 32.12  
 

Natural Gas ($/Mcf)

  $ 11.99   $ 8.29   $ 3.70  

Operating Revenues and Commodity

                   
 

Derivative Settlements (In Thousands)

  $ 32,065   $ 21,614   $ 10,451  

Average Adjusted Price (includes Commodity derivative settlements)

                   
 

Crude Oil ($/Bbl)

  $ 81.92   $ 62.17   $ 19.75  
 

Natural Gas ($/Mcf)

  $ 12.48   $ 9.41   $ 3.07  

        The 2008 fiscal year operating revenues of $34.7 million represent an improvement of $14.0 million as compared to the 2007 fiscal year operating revenues of $20.7 million. The $14.0 million improvement is primarily attributable to:

Operating Expenses

        For the 2008 fiscal year, Cano's total operating expenses were $34.7 million, or $8.3 million higher than the 2007 fiscal year of $26.4 million. The $8.3 million increase is primarily attributed to increased lease operating expenses of $4.6 million, higher general and administrative expenses of $2.2 million, higher production and ad valorem taxes of $0.8 million and increased depletion and depreciation expense of $0.7 million.

General and Administrative Expenses

        For the 2008 fiscal year, Cano's G&A expenses totaled $14.9 million, which is $2.3 million higher than fiscal year 2007 of $12.6 million. The primary contributors to the $2.3 million increase were:

III-42


Table of Contents

        These increases were partially offset by lower fees of $0.3 million for accounting services to achieve full compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and reductions totaling $0.1 million pertaining to other expenses.

Depletion and Depreciation

        For the 2008 fiscal year, Cano's depletion and depreciation expense was $3.9 million, an increase of $0.7 million as compared to the 2007 fiscal year depletion and depreciation expense of $3.2 million. This includes depletion expense pertaining to Cano's oil and natural gas properties, and depreciation expense pertaining to its field operations vehicles and equipment, natural gas plant, office furniture and computers. The increase is due to increased crude oil and natural gas sales volumes as previously discussed under "—Operating Revenues" and higher per BOE depletion rates. For the 2008 fiscal year, Cano's depletion rate pertaining to its oil and gas properties was $8.19 per BOE, as compared to 2007 fiscal year rate of $6.91 per BOE. The higher depletion rates resulted from a reduction of reserves for the Desdemona—Barnett Shale and Pantwist Properties, as discussed in Note 18 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements, and higher depletion rates attributed to the Cato Properties.

Interest Expense and Other

        For the 2008 and 2007 fiscal years, Cano incurred interest expense of $0.8 million and $1.7 million, respectively, as a direct result of the credit agreements Cano entered into, as discussed in Note 6 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements. The interest expense for the 2008 and 2007 fiscal years was reduced by $2.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for interest cost that was capitalized to the waterflood and ASP projects. Cano incurred higher interest costs during the 2008 fiscal year due to higher outstanding debt balances and higher interest rates.

Gain (Loss) on Commodity Derivatives

        The 2008 fiscal year loss consists of unrealized and realized losses of $29.4 million and $2.6 million, respectively. For the 2007 fiscal year, Cano incurred an unrealized loss of $1.8 million and a realized gain of $1.0 million.

Income Tax Benefit (Expense)

        For the 2008 fiscal year, Cano had income tax expense of $9.8 million, as compared to an income tax benefit for the 2007 fiscal year of $0.4 million. These tax amounts included taxes related to discontinued operations as shown in Note 8 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements. The increased income taxes for the 2008 fiscal year, as compared to the 2007 fiscal year, is due to the increase in taxable income and an increase in the state tax rate and other permanent items, as presented in Note 16 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements, resulting in an aggregate rate of 35.9%. The income tax rates for the 2007 fiscal year was 35.3% for such year.

Income from Discontinued Operations

        For the 2008 and 2007 fiscal years, Cano had income from discontinued operations of $3.5 million and $4.5 million, respectively, due to its divestitures of Pantwist, LLC, the Corsicana Properties and the Rich Valley Properties, as discussed in Note 8 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements.

Cano Preferred Stock Dividend

        The Cano preferred stock dividend for the 2008 fiscal year of $4.1 million was $0.9 million higher than the $3.2 million for the 2007 fiscal year. This is primarily due to $0.5 million federal tax withholding previously discussed.

III-43


Table of Contents

Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2009

        For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano had a loss applicable to common stock of $0.2 million, which was an improvement of $1.0 million as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009 of a $1.2 million loss applicable to common stock. The $1.0 million earnings improvement primarily related to higher operating revenues of $2.2 million and increased income from discontinued operations of $1.6 million, partially offset by reduced gain on derivatives of $2.7 million.

        For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano had a loss applicable to common stock of $13.1 million, which was a $37.4 million decrease as compared to the $24.3 million income applicable to common stock incurred for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. Items contributing to the $37.4 million earnings decrease were reduced gain on derivatives of $52.9 million, lower income from discontinued operations of $10.0 million, decreased income from the preferred stock repurchased for less than the carrying amount of $10.9 million and lower operating revenues of $1.7 million. Partially offsetting the earnings decrease were lower operating expenses of $27.0 million, which is primarily attributable to a $22.4 million charge for impairment of long-lived assets during the nine months ended March 31, 2009.

        These items will be addressed in the following discussion.

Operating Revenues

        The table below summarizes Cano's operating revenues for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.

 
  Three months ended March 31,    
  Nine months ended March 31,    
 
 
  Increase
(Decrease)
  Increase
(Decrease)
 
 
  2010   2009   2010   2009  

Operating Revenues (in thousands)

  $ 5,803   $ 3,606   $ 2,197   $ 16,368   $ 18,119   $ (1,751 )

Sales Volumes

                                     
 

Crude Oil (MBbls)

    68     78     (10 )   208     220     (12 )
 

Natural Gas (MMcf)

    90     124     (34 )   324     398     (74 )
 

Total (MBOE)

    83     99     (16 )   262     286     (24 )

Average Realized Price

                                     
 

Crude Oil ($/ Bbl)

  $ 72.62   $ 35.40   $ 37.22   $ 67.56   $ 65.97   $ 1.59  
 

Natural Gas ($/ Mcf)

  $ 9.70   $ 5.41   $ 4.29   $ 7.17   $ 8.26   $ (1.09 )

Operating Revenues and Commodity Derivative Settlements (in thousands)

  $ 6,556   $ 6,452   $ 104   $ 20,167   $ 22,126   $ (1,959 )

Average Adjusted Price (includes commodity derivative settlements)

                                     
 

Crude Oil ($/ Bbl)

  $ 75.32   $ 62.32   $ 13.00   $ 73.48   $ 79.71   $ (6.23 )
 

Natural Gas ($/Mcf)

  $ 15.99   $ 11.26   $ 4.73   $ 15.09   $ 10.74   $ 4.35  

        The three months ended March 31, 2010 operating revenues of $5.8 million are $2.2 million higher as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009 of $3.6 million. The $2.2 million increase is primarily attributable to higher average prices received for crude oil and natural gas sales of $2.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively, partially offset by lower crude oil and natural gas sales volumes which combined to reduce revenues by $0.6 million.

        The nine months ended March 31, 2010 operating revenues of $16.4 million are $1.7 million lower as compared to the nine months ended March 31, 2009 of $18.1 million. The $1.7 million decrease is primarily attributable to lower crude oil and natural gas sales volumes which reduced revenues by $0.8 million and $0.6 million, respectively, and lower average prices received for natural gas sales of $0.4 million and lower other revenue of $0.3 million. Partially offsetting these revenue decreases were higher prices received for crude oil sales of $0.3 million.

III-44


Table of Contents

        The average prices Cano received for its crude oil and natural gas sales are supplemented by commodity derivative settlements received for the three- and nine month-periods ending March 31, 2010 and 2009, as presented in the preceding table. If crude oil and natural gas NYMEX prices are lower than derivative floor prices, Cano will be reimbursed by its counterparty for the difference between the NYMEX price and floor price (i.e. realized gain). Conversely, if crude oil and natural gas NYMEX prices are higher than the derivative ceiling prices, Cano will pay its counterparty for the difference between the NYMEX price and ceiling price (i.e. realized loss).

        Crude Oil Sales Volumes.    For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's crude oil sales were 10 MBbls lower as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009. This resulted from lower sales from the Cato Properties of 6 MBbls and from the Panhandle Properties of 4 MBbls due to severe weather during January and February 2010 which temporarily curtailed production. The sales decrease at the Cato Properties resulted from the reduction of injected water and redistribution of water injection at the waterflood which resulted in lower production, as discussed under "—Drilling Capital Development and Operating Activities Update."

        For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's crude oil sales were 12 MBbls lower as compared to the nine months ended March 31, 2009 due to the reasons previously discussed and lower sales from the Panhandle Properties due to temporary shut-in production at the Cockrell Ranch waterflood resulting from the controlled injection project surveillance, as previously discussed under the "—Drilling Capital Development and Operating Activities Update." All Cockrell Ranch production that had been shut-in for the controlled injection project was restored on September 28, 2009.

        Natural Gas Sales Volumes.    For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's natural gas sales were 34 MMcf lower as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009 primarily due to reduced sales at the Cato Properties of 21 MMcf, the Panhandle Properties of 8 MMcf and the Desdemona Properties of 7 MMcf. The sales reduction at the Cato Properties occurred as the natural gas purchaser temporarily declined to take the natural gas production for most of the three months ended March 31, 2010. Gas sales resumed at the Cato Properties in mid-March 2010. The lower natural gas sales at the Panhandle Properties resulted from the severe weather, as previously discussed. Lower sales at the Desdemona Properties resulted as the gas plant was temporarily shut-in to equip the plant to handle increased natural gas production from the return to production of 25 shut-in gas wells as previously discussed under the "—Drilling Capital Development and Operating Activities Update."

        For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's natural gas sales were 74 MMcf lower as compared to the nine months ended March 31, 2009 primarily due to lower sales at the Desdemona Properties of 30 MMcf, Panhandle Properties of 24 MMcf and Cato Properties of 17 MMcf. Lower natural gas sales at the Desdemona Properties resulted from the shut-in natural gas production from Cano's Barnett Shale wells during July 2009, based upon the current and near-term outlook of natural gas prices and the reactivation of its gas plant, as previously discussed. Lower natural gas sales at the Panhandle Properties resulted from severe weather and from the controlled production project at Cockrell Ranch waterflood, as previously discussed, and one of Cano's gas purchasers experienced an unplanned plant outage from mid-August 2009 through the end of September 2009, which resulted in reduced natural gas and NGL sales. Lower natural gas sales at the Cato Properties resulted from the purchaser temporarily declining to take natural gas production, as previously discussed.

        Crude Oil and Natural Gas Prices.    The average price Cano receives for crude oil sales is generally at market prices received at the wellhead, except for the Cato Properties, for which it receives below market prices due to the level of impurities in the oil. The average price Cano receives for natural gas sales is approximately the market price received at the wellhead, adjusted for the value of natural gas liquids, less transportation and marketing expenses. As previously discussed, Cano has commodity derivatives in place that mitigate future price risk.

III-45


Table of Contents

        Cano expects to grow sales through its development plans as previously discussed under "—Development Capital Expenditures and Operating Activities Update."

Operating Expenses

        For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's total operating expenses were $8.2 million, which approximated the three months ended March 31, 2009 of $8.1 million. Lower lease operating expenses of $0.4 million and lower depletion and depreciation expense of $0.4 million were offset by increased general and administrative of $0.8 million and increased production taxes of $0.1 million.

        For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's total operating expenses were $31.6 million, which is a decrease of $27.0 million as compared to the nine months ended March 31, 2009 of $58.7 million. The nine months ended March 31, 2009 included an impairment of long-lived assets of $22.4 million, which is the primary reason for the overall decrease. In addition, Cano had reduced general and administrative of $7.2 million, lower lease operating expenses of $1.9 million and lower depletion and depreciation expense of $0.5 million, partially offset by the exploration expense of $5.0 million recorded during the nine months ended March 31, 2010.

        Cano's LOE consist of the costs of producing crude oil and natural gas such as labor, supplies, repairs, maintenance, workovers and utilities.

        For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's LOE was $3.6 million, which is $0.4 million lower than the three months ended March 31, 2009 of $4.0 million. The LOE decrease for the three months ended March 31, 2010 of $0.4 million resulted primarily from reduced service rates negotiated with the vendors of $0.3 million, lower electricity expense of $0.1 million and the shut-in of Cano's Barnett Shale natural gas wells, as previously discussed under "Operating Revenues," which reduced LOE by $0.1 million. Partially offsetting these LOE cost reductions were increased LOE at the Cato Properties of $0.1 million to support increased focus on production activities.

        For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's LOE was $11.8 million, which is $1.9 million lower than the nine months ended March 31, 2009 of $13.7 million. The LOE decreases for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 of $1.9 million resulted primarily from reduced service rates negotiated with vendors of $1.2 million, lower electricity expense of $0.8 million and the shut-in of Cano's Barnett Shale natural gas wells which reduced LOE by $0.5 million. Partially offsetting these LOE cost reductions were increased LOE at the Cato Properties $0.6 million to support increased focus on production activities.

        For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's LOE per BOE, based on production, was $36.88, which is an improvement of $1.22 as compared to $38.10 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's LOE per BOE, based on production, was $39.80, which is an improvement of $5.27 as compared to $45.07 for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. In general, secondary and tertiary LOE is higher than LOE for companies developing primary production because Cano's fields are more mature and typically produce less oil and more water. Cano expects LOE to decrease during the 2010 fiscal year as it realize the continued benefit of lower service rates negotiated with vendors, and expects LOE per BOE to decrease as production increases from the waterflood and EOR development activities it has implemented and are implementing as discussed under the "—Drilling Capital Development and Operating Activities Update."

        For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's production and ad valorem taxes were $0.5 million, which is $0.2 million higher than the three months ended March 31, 2009 of $0.3 million. The $0.2 million increase resulted from higher production taxes from increased operating revenue.

III-46


Table of Contents

Cano's production taxes as a percent of operating revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were 6.4% as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009 of 5.5%.

        For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's production and ad valorem taxes were $1.4 million, which is $0.3 million lower than the nine months ended March 31, 2009 of $1.7 million. The $0.3 million decrease resulted from lower production taxes of $0.1 million due to lower operating revenues and reduced ad valorem taxes of $0.2 million due to lower property tax valuations by taxing authorities for the 2009 calendar year. Cano's production taxes as a percent of operating revenues for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 of 6.4% was comparable to the nine months ended March 31, 2009 of 6.5%.

        Cano's general and administrative, which it refers to as G&A expenses, consist of support services for its operating activities and investor relations costs.

        For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's G&A expenses totaled $2.9 million, which is $0.7 million higher than the three months ended March 31, 2009 of $2.2 million. The $0.7 million increase resulted from higher legal costs of $1.1 million partially offset by lower stock-based compensation costs of $0.4 million. The $1.1 million increase in legal expenses is due to the three months ended March 31, 2010 including $0.3 million of costs pertaining to litigation and merger-related activities and the three months ended March 31, 2009 included a settlement received from the former owners of the Panhandle Properties pertaining to the fire litigation. The lower stock-based compensation costs are directly related to reduced issuances of stock options and restricted stock.

        For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's G&A expenses totaled $9.4 million, which is $7.2 million lower than the nine months ended March 31, 2009 of $16.6 million. The $7.2 million expense reduction resulted primarily from reduced litigation costs of $6.4 million, reduced stock-based compensation costs of $1.4 million, and lower payroll and benefits costs of $0.6 million. Partially offsetting these expense reductions were increased costs related to the merger of $1.7 million. The reduced payroll and benefits costs resulted from workforce reductions that Cano implemented during the quarter ended March 31, 2009, which eliminated 25% of its home office staff. The lower stock-based compensation was previously discussed. The litigation cost reduction occurred as Cano settled all but one of its fire litigation claims during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. Cano expects continued decreases in future quarters' legal expenses after Cano close the proposed merger with Resaca.

        During the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano recorded exploration expense of $5.0 million pertaining to the Nowata Alkaline-Surfactant-Polymer, which we refer to as the Nowata ASP Project. During December 2009, Cano finalized its performance analysis, which indicated the Nowata ASP Project did not result in increased oil production of significant quantities to be considered economically viable that would justify the recognition of proved reserves. Accordingly, at December 31, 2009, Cano recorded a $5.0 million pre-tax exploration expense.

        During the quarter ended December 31, 2009, Cano wrote down $0.3 million of costs associated with the ASP facility used for the Nowata ASP Project. The facility's water filtering process did not work properly with the oil-water fluid production at the Nowata Properties. Cano intends to use the ASP facility for future pilot tertiary projects at its Cato and Panhandle Properties.

        During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, Cano recorded a $22.4 million pre-tax impairment to its Barnett Shale Properties and a $0.7 million pre-tax impairment to the goodwill associated with its subsidiary which holds the equity in its Barnett Shale Properties. Cano recorded the impairments due

III-47


Table of Contents


to the decline in commodity prices which created an uncertainty in the likelihood of developing reserves associated with its Barnett Shale Properties within the next five years.

        For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's depletion and depreciation expense was $1.1 million, which is $0.5 million lower as compared to $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's depletion and depreciation expense was $3.6 million, which is $0.5 million lower as compared to $4.1 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. This includes depletion expense pertaining to Cano's oil and natural gas properties, and depreciation expense pertaining to its field operations vehicles and equipment, natural gas plant, office furniture and computers. The decrease is primarily due to lower crude oil and natural gas sales volumes (net) as previously discussed under "—Operating Revenues." For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's depletion rate pertaining to its oil and gas properties was $10.60 per BOE and $11.20 per BOE, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and nine months ended March 31, 2009, Cano's depletion rate pertaining to its oil and gas properties was $13.34 per BOE and $12.57 per BOE, respectively.

        For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, Cano incurred interest expense of $0.5 million and $0.1 million, respectively. For the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, Cano incurred interest expense of $0.9 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Cano's interest expense is a direct result of the credit agreements it entered into. The interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was reduced by $0.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for interest cost that was capitalized to the waterflood projects discussed under "—Development Capital Expenditures and Operating Activities Update." The interest expense for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was reduced by $1.5 million and $0.9 million, respectively, for the same reason. Cano incurred higher interest costs during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 due to higher outstanding debt balances. The interest rates under Cano's credit agreements for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 were comparable to the interest rates it incurred for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009.

        Cano has entered into financial derivatives contracts for its commodity sales and interest expense. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano recorded a gain on derivatives of $0.8 million as compared to a gain of $3.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The three months ended March 31, 2010 gain of $0.8 million consisted of an unrealized gain of $0.1 million and a realized gain on settlements of derivative contracts of $0.7 million.

        For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano recorded a loss on derivatives of $4.5 million as compared to a gain of $48.5 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. The nine months ended March 31, 2010 loss on derivatives of $4.5 million consisted of an unrealized loss of $8.1 million and a realized gain on settlements of derivative contracts of $3.6 million.

        The realized gain primarily pertains to the realization of commodity settlements, as crude oil and natural gas NYMEX prices were lower than the floor prices.

        The unrealized gain and loss for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and nine months, respectively, reflects the fair value of the commodity derivatives as of March 31, 2010 as compared to December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively. By their nature, these commodity derivatives can have a highly volatile impact on Cano's earnings. A ten percent change in the prices for Cano's commodity derivative instruments could impact its pre-tax earnings by approximately $35,000.

III-48


Table of Contents

        For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano had income tax benefit of $0.6 million, as compared to an income tax benefit for the three months ended March 31, 2009 of $0.4 million. For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano had an income tax benefit of $6.8 million, as compared to income tax expense for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 of $3.3 million. The effective income tax rates for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and nine months ended March 31, 2010 were 28.2% and 33.0%, respectively. The effective income tax rates for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 were 30.4% and 48.2%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 was higher due to an increase in the state tax rate.

        For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano had income from discontinued operations of $1.7 million and $2.1 million, respectively. For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009, Cano had income from discontinued operations of $0.1 million and $12.1 million, respectively. This resulted from Cano's divestitures of the certain Panhandle Properties, Pantwist and Corsicana Properties.

        The preferred stock dividend for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $0.5 million for each quarter. The preferred stock dividend for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 of $1.4 million was a decrease of $0.9 million from $2.3 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. The decrease of $0.9 million is attributable to the November and December 2008 repurchases of preferred stock. Due to the repurchases, Cano's quarterly preferred stock dividends will be approximately $0.5 million per quarter of which 59% will be PIK, with the balance paid in cash.

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) of Cano

        Cano derived the selected historical financial data in the table below from our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements. The sum of net income per share by quarter may not equal the net income per share for the year due to variations in the weighted average shares outstanding used in computing such amounts. The historical data presented here are only a summary and should be read in conjunction with Cano's consolidated financial statements, related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this annual report.

In thousands, except per share data
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010
  Sept. 30(a)   Dec. 31(a)   Mar. 31(a)    
 

Operating revenues from continuing operations

  $ 4,931   $ 5,634   $ 5,803        

Operating loss from continuing operations

    (4,726 )   (8,171 )   (2,383 )      

Loss from continuing operations

    (3,693 )   (8,646 )   (1,494 )      

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

    132     212     1,722        

Net income (loss) applicable to common stock

    (4,031 )   (8,854 )   (242 )      

Net income (loss) per share—basic

    (0.09 )   (0.19 )          

Net income (loss) per share—diluted

    (0.09 )   (0.19 )          

III-49


Table of Contents


Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2009
  Sept. 30(b)   Dec. 31(c)   Mar. 31   Jun. 30(d)  

Operating revenues from continuing operations

  $ 10,932   $ 4,876   $ 3,928   $ 5,673  

Operating loss from continuing operations

    (1,335 )   (33,703 )   (4,332 )   (19,645 )

Loss from continuing operations

    13,607     (8,628 )   (704 )   (15,986 )

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

    (853 )   12,246     (5 )   92  

Net income (loss) applicable to common stock

    11,818     13,653     (1,179 )   (16,363 )

Net income (loss) per share—basic

    0.26     0.30     (0.03 )   (0.36 )

Net income (loss) per share—diluted

    0.23     0.27     (0.03 )   (0.36 )

 

Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2008
  Sept. 30   Dec. 31   Mar. 31   Jun. 30(e)  

Operating revenues from continuing operations

  $ 6,586   $ 7,696   $ 9,173   $ 11,195  

Operating income (loss) from continuing operations

    (1,008 )   (155 )   613     507  

Loss from continuing operations

    (931 )   (1,412 )   (1,995 )   (16,654 )

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

    652     722     946     1,151  

Net loss applicable to common stock

    (1,246 )   (1,578 )   (1,926 )   (16,854 )

Net loss per share—basic and diluted

    (0.04 )   (0.04 )   (0.05 )   (0.47 )

(a)
The discontinued operations for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 pertain to the sale of certain wells located in our Panhandle Properties during January 2010. The discontinued operations for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 pertain to discontinued operations which occured prior to June 30, 2009.

(b)
For the quarter ended September 30, 2008, Cano's results of operations were favorably impacted by $24.2 million unrealized gain on commodity derivatives resulting from a significant price decrease for both crude oil and natural gas.

(c)
For the quarter ended December 31, 2008, Cano's results of operations were unfavorably impacted by impairment of long-lived assets of $22.4 million, partially offset by unrealized gain on commodity derivatives.

(d)
For the quarter ended June 30, 2009, Cano's results of operations were unfavorably impacted by exploration expense of $11.4 million and impairment of long-lived assets of $4.3 million.

(e)
For the quarter ended June 30, 2008, Cano's results of operations were unfavorably impacted by $23.8 million unrealized loss on commodity derivatives resulting from a significant price increase for both crude oil and natural gas.

Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Combined Company

        Resaca's and Cano's primary sources of capital and liquidity have been issuances of common equity, borrowings under their respective credit agreements, and cash flows from operating activities. The combined company expects to fund its calendar year 2010 budgeted capital expenditures with cash on hand, including cash retained on our balance sheet from a portion of the net proceeds of the offering, cash flow from operations and borrowings under the New Facility. The New Facility and calendar year 2010 budgeted capital expenditure plan are discussed in greater detail below.

        Resaca and Cano's cash flows from operations are significantly affected by the market prices for oil and natural gas at the time of sale, our production output, and the success of our exploitation activities. Resaca and Cano's hedge positions reduce our exposure to declines in oil and gas prices. At March 31, 2010, pro forma for the completion of the merger, but without consideration of the offering and the use of proceeds as described herein, we had $1.5 million of cash on hand and $100.0 million of total debt outstanding.

III-50


Table of Contents

        The current worldwide financial crisis has reduced the availability of liquidity and credit. Continued disruption of the credit markets could adversely affect Resaca's ability to implement its exploitation plan and limit Resaca's ability to expand its asset base, which could materially impact its results of operations, financial position or cash flows. Notwithstanding the current market conditions, Resaca's management believes it is well positioned in this market and intends to leverage the many relationships with energy lenders and other capital providers that it has developed over their extensive careers in the oil and gas industry to endure these difficult times.

Liquidity and Capital Resources of Resaca

        On June 26, 2009, Resaca entered into a new $50.0 million, three-year Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility, which we refer to as the CIT Facility, with CIT Capital USA Inc. serving as administrative agent, that matures on July 1, 2012. The initial borrowing base of the CIT Facility is $35.0 million. As of March 31, 2010, Resaca had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $0.7 million and a working capital deficit of $2.0 million. Resaca had fully drawn on the amounts available under the CIT Facility at December 31, 2009. The Company anticipates cash flows from operations will be sufficient to satisfy its currently expected working capital requirements for the next twelve months. The Company will also have the flexibility to modify its capital expenditure program based on actual operating cash flows.

        On April 26, 2010, Resaca received a commitment for the New Facility which, combined with the proceeds of the offering, will provide funding for Resaca's working capital and capital expenditures following the merger. If Resaca's cash flows from operations, the proceeds from the offering, and borrowings from the New Facility are not sufficient or successful, Resaca would need to consider other alternatives, including selling certain non core properties or other credit and capital market alternatives to fund its operations and capital needs. There can be no assurance that any of these alternatives will be available at terms acceptable to Resaca or at all.

Contractual Obligations

        The following table sets forth our combined contractual obligations at May 28, 2010 for the periods shown:

Amounts in thousands
  Total   Less than 1 Year   1 To 3 Years   3 to 5 Years   More Than 5 Years  

Resaca long-term debt (See Note D to Resaca's Consolidated Financial Statements)

  $ 35,000   $   $ 35,000   $   $  

Cano long-term debt (See Note 4 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements)(a)

    65,900     65,900              

Cano Series D Preferred Stock

    28,125         28,125          
                       

Total contractual obligations

  $ 129,025   $ 65,900   $ 63,125   $   $  
                       

(a)
Cano's debt has been classified as a current liability. The maturity dates of the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement and Subordinated Credit Agreement are December 17, 2012 and June 17, 2013, respectively.

        Following the merger, the combined company expects to have contractual obligations of $129.0 million consisting of $35.0 million of borrowings outstanding under Resaca's CIT Facility, $50.9 million of borrowings outstanding under Cano's Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement, Cano debt of $15.0 million outstanding under Cano's Subordinated Credit Agreement and Cano preferred stock of $28.1 million. Immediately following the offering and closing of the New Facility, the combined company anticipates repaying all $35.0 million of Resaca's debt obligations and all $65.9 million of Cano's debt obligations with proceeds from the offering and borrowings under the New Facility. In

III-51


Table of Contents


addition, the combined company intends to use proceeds from the offering to pay between $8.1 million and $9.4 million of expenses related to the offering, the New Facility and financial advisory fees. After giving effect to the above transactions and assuming gross offering proceeds of between $50.0 million and $75 million, the combined company anticipates having between $34.0 million and $57.5 million outstanding under the New Facility (see page I-61). Additionally, the combined company will be obligated to pay cash severance costs of approximately $1.9 million six months following the closing of the merger.

        In addition to these obligations, the combined company expects to spend approximately $45 million in capital expenditures in the twelve (12) months following the merger. The combined company intends to fund its expected capital expenditures with cash flow from operations and future borrowings under the New Facility. As the combined company's near-term capital expenditures target the conversion of its PDNP and PUD reserves to PDP reserves, the combined company aims to increase the borrowing base under the New Facility over the next two years. The New Facility has a two-year maturity which can be extended to three years subject to certain conditions. Based upon the conditions of the capital markets, the combined company's production profile and its reserve base, the combined company will seek to either extend, expand or reduce this facility at a time closer to its maturity.

        The Cano currently issued and outstanding preferred stock will be exchanged for newly issued Resaca preferred stock immediately following the closing of the merger. The Resaca preferred stock is subject to mandatory redemption at its maturity date. The holders of the Resaca preferred stock have the option to convert the Resaca preferred stock to Resaca common stock through the maturity date of October 6, 2012. If any Resaca preferred stock remains outstanding on October 6, 2012, then the combined company is required to redeem the Resaca preferred stock in cash equal to the stated value of the Resaca preferred stock, plus accrued dividends and paid-in-kind dividends. Resaca expects to finance the redemption of outstanding Resaca preferred stock, if any, on October 6, 2012, through a combination of cash on hand, available debt borrowings and/or equity issuances.

        If the combined company does not have sufficient borrowing capacity to fund its obligations and its budgeted capital expenditures and it is not able to raise additional debt or equity capital, the combined company would need to consider other alternatives, including selling non-core properties. There can be no assurance that these alternatives will be available at terms acceptable to the combined company or at all. The New Facility, including the use of its proceeds, is discussed in greater detail under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Resaca—Our New Facility" on pages III-54 and III-55.

        See the "Risk Factors" on pages I-59 and I-69.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

        Resaca's and Cano's off balance sheet arrangements are limited to operating leases that have not and are not reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on its financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Resaca's Current Credit Facility

        Interest on the CIT Facility is set at LIBOR plus a 5.5% margin subject to a 2.5% LIBOR floor. At June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2010, the interest rate in place was 8.0%. Recourse for the CIT Facility is limited to Resaca, as borrower and the note is secured by all of Resaca's oil and gas properties. On December 22, 2009, Resaca executed an amendment to the CIT Facility, which amended some of the financial ratio requirements, and Resaca paid an amendment fee of $87,500. As of March 31, 2010, Resaca was not in compliance with the required ratio with respect to current assets to current liabilities and the formation of Merger Sub and obtained a waiver for noncompliance. At

III-52


Table of Contents


March 31, 2010, Resaca had borrowed $35.0 million outstanding under the CIT Facility. A portion of the net proceeds from the offering and borrowings under the New Facility will be used to repay, in full, the balance outstanding under the CIT Facility. Upon repayment of this facility, it will be terminated.

Cano's Current Credit Facilities

        Cano's long-term debt consists of its senior credit facility (current borrowing base of $60.0 million) and its subordinated credit agreement ($15.0 million availability), which are discussed in greater detail below.

        At March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, the outstanding amount due under Cano's credit agreements was $65.0 million and $55.7 million, respectively. The $65.0 million at March 31, 2010, consisted of outstanding borrowings under the senior and subordinated credit agreements of $50.0 million and $15.0 million, respectively. At March 31, 2010, the average interest rates under the senior and subordinated credit agreements were 2.75% and 6.26%, respectively. A portion of the net proceeds from the offering and borrowings under the New Facility will be used to repay, in full, balances outstanding under these facilities. Upon repayment of these facilities, they will be terminated.

Senior Credit Agreement

        On December 17, 2008, Cano finalized a $120.0 million Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which we refer to as the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement, with UBNA and Natixis. The initial and current borrowing base, based upon Cano's proved reserves, is $60.0 million. Pursuant to the terms of the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement, the borrowing base is to be redetermined semi-annually with one interim, additional redetermination allowed during any six month period between scheduled redeterminations at either the option of Cano's lenders or Cano. At Cano's option, interest is either (i) the sum of (a) the UBNA reference rate and (b) the applicable margin of (1) 0.875% if less than 50% of the borrowing base is borrowed, (2) 1.125% if at least 50% but less than 75% of the borrowing base is borrowed, (3) 1.375% if at least 75% but less than 90% of the borrowing base is borrowed or (4) 1.625% if at least 90% of the borrowing base is borrowed; or (ii) the sum of (a) the one, two, three, six, nine or twelve month LIBOR rate (at our option) and (b) the applicable margin of (1) 2.0% if less than 50% of the borrowing base is borrowed, (2) 2.25% if at least 50% but less than 75% of the borrowing base is borrowed, (3) 2.50% if at least 75% but less than 90% of the borrowing base is borrowed or (4) 2.75% if at least 90% of the borrowing base is borrowed. Cano owes a commitment fee on the unborrowed portion of the borrowing base of 0.375% per annum if less than 90% of the borrowing base is borrowed and 0.50% per annum if at least 90% of the borrowing base is borrowed. Unless specific events of default occur, the maturity date of the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement is December 17, 2012. On December 30, 2009, Cano entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement, which specifies (i) Cano's borrowing base was redetermined to be $60.0 million, which will remain in effect until it is redetermined in accordance with the agreement, (ii) advances under the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement for any purpose other than to acquire proved, developed, producing oil and gas properties shall not exceed $52.0 million and (iii) the covenants relating to Cano's leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio were waived for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2009. In connection with such amendment, Cano paid an amendment fee of $90,000. On March 30, 2010, Cano entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement, which specifies the covenants relating to Cano's leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio were waived for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2010. The amendment also specifies that if the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement has not been replaced, refinanced, or amended and restated on or before May 31, 2010, then Cano agrees to pay on May 31, 2010 an amendment fee amount of $90,000. A portion of the net proceeds from the offering and borrowings under the New Facility will be used to repay, in full, amounts outstanding under this facility. Upon repayment of this facility, it will be terminated.

III-53


Table of Contents

Subordinated Credit Agreement

        On December 17, 2008, Cano finalized a $25.0 million Subordinated Credit Agreement among Cano, the lenders and UnionBanCal Equities, Inc., which we refer to as UBE, as administrative agent, which we refer to as the Subordinated Credit Agreement. On March 17, 2009, Cano borrowed the maximum available amount of $15.0 million under this agreement and paid down outstanding senior debt under the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement. An additional $10.0 million could be made available at the lender's sole discretion. The interest rate is the sum of (a) the one, two, three, six, nine or twelve month LIBOR rate (at Cano's option) and (b) 6.0%. Unless specific events of default occur, the maturity date is June 17, 2013. On December 30, 2009, Cano entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Subordinated Credit Agreement, which specifies the covenants relating to its leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio were waived for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2009. In connection with such amendment, Cano paid an amendment fee of $22,500. On March 30, 2010, Cano entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Subordinated Credit Agreement, which specifies the covenants relating to Cano's leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio were waived for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2010. The amendment also specifies that if the Subordinated Credit Agreement has not been terminated on or before May 31, 2010, then Cano agrees to pay on May 31, 2010 an amendment fee amount of $22,500. A portion of the net proceeds from the offering and borrowings under the New Facility will be used to repay, in full, the balance outstanding under this facility. Upon repayment of this facility, it will be terminated. The ability to make the afore-mentioned repayment of this facility and the ability to reduce overall indebtedness for the combined company is dependent upon the amount of proceeds from the offering.

Our New Facility

        Resaca has a firm commitment from UBNA, as administrative agent and an issuing lender, and Natixis as an issuing lender to arrange a new revolving senior secured credit facility providing for first priority loan borrowings not to exceed a borrowing base initially determined at $90 million with financial institutions acceptable to Resaca and to the issuing lenders. The New Facility shall be guaranteed by all of the combined company's existing and future material subsidiaries. Borrowings under the New Facility shall be subject to semi-annual borrowing base redeterminations commencing September 1, 2010. The New Facility shall include provisions for the issuance of letters of credit in the aggregate maximum amount of $5 million. Advances under the New Facility shall be in the form of either base rate loans or LIBOR loans. The interest rate on base rate loans shall be tied to the "UB Reference Rate" plus a margin of 1.5% to 2.25% based on the percentage of the borrowing base utilized at the time of the credit extension. The interest rate on LIBOR loans shall be LIBOR for a 30, 60, 90 or (if available) 180 day period plus a margin of 2.50% to 3.25% based on the percentage of the borrowing base utilized at the time of the credit extension.

        Interest shall be payable quarterly with respect to base rate loans and after each 30, 60, 90 or 180 (with an interim interest payment on the 90th day of such interest period as well) day period, as applicable, for LIBOR loans. The New Facility will mature on July 1, 2012. The maturity date of the New Facility shall be extended to the third anniversary of the closing date of the New Facility if all of the Resaca preferred stock has been converted to common equity or the stated maturity date or the redemption date thereof has been extended to a date that is at least 91 days after the third anniversary of the closing date of the New Facility and no default then exists under the New Facility.

        Proceeds of the New Facility shall be available for the following purposes: (i) to refinance in full Resaca's existing senior secured debt under the CIT Facility; (ii) to refinance in full Cano's existing senior secured debt under the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement; (iii) to repay in full Cano's existing second lien debt under the Subordinated Credit Agreement with UBE; (iv) for oil and gas exploration and production; and (v) for general corporate purposes, including working capital and acquisitions.

III-54


Table of Contents

        The New Facility shall contain, among other terms, provisions for the maintenance of certain financial ratios and certain restrictions related to (i) debt, (ii) liens, (iii) mergers, (iv) asset sales, (v) investments, (vi) change of ownership, (vii) distributions, redemptions and purchase of Resaca common stock and Resaca preferred stock, and (viii) hedging transactions. The New Facility shall be secured by not less than 80% of the value of the combined company's existing and future oil and gas properties.

        Resaca has negotiated the New Credit Agreement which is filed as Exhibit 10.222 hereto. The New Credit Agreeement is a working draft only. Neither the New Credit Agreement, nor any term or provision set forth in the New Credit Agreement are binding on any person or entity under any and all circumstances until the execution and delivery thereof by the parties thereto and the satisfaction of the conditions set forth therein. The New Credit Agreement is subject, in all respects, to changes, supplements and deletions and to the further review by all persons or entities involved.

        Upon consummation of the New Facility, there will be a novation of all BP Corporation North America Inc., which we call BP, hedges to one of the lenders under the New Facility. See "—The Combined Company's Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Commodity Risk" on page III-63.

        Immediately following the offering and closing of the New Facility, the combined company anticipates repaying all $35.0 million of Resaca's debt obligations and all $65.9 million of Cano's debt obligations with proceeds from the offering and borrowings under the New Facility. In addition, the combined company intends to use proceeds of the offering to pay between $8.1 million and $9.4 million of expenses related to the offering, the New Facility and financial advisory fees. After giving effect to the above transactions and assuming gross offering proceeds of between $50.0 million and $75.0 million, the combined company anticipates having between $34.0 million and $57.5 million outstanding under the New Facility (see page I-61). The ability of the combined company to repay all of Resaca and Cano's outstanding indebtedness is dependent upon obtaining at least $45 million in gross proceeds from the offering.

Capital Expenditures

        Resaca and Cano have made and will continue to make significant capital expenditures in the development and production of our oil and gas reserves. Resaca's capital expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2009 were $20.0 million, a $15.5 million increase over the year ended June 30, 2008. Resaca's capital expenditures for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 were $3.4 million, a $15.3 million decrease from the nine months ended March 31, 2009. Cano's capital expenditures for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 were $10.6 million, a $34.1 million decrease from the nine months ended March 31, 2009. The curtailment of capital expenditures for both Resaca and Cano was due to a lack of borrowing capacity under each company's senior debt facility and due to lower commodity prices.

        The combined company expects to spend approximately $45 million on capital expenditures in the twelve months following the merger. We plan to fund these capital expenditures with cash on hand, cash flow from operations and future borrowings under the New Facility. Immediately following the offering and closing of the New Facility, the combined company anticipates repaying all $35.0 million of Resaca's debt obligations and all $65.9 million of Cano's debt obligations with proceeds from the offering and borrowings under the New Facility. In addition, the combined company intends to use proceeds of the offering to pay between $8.1 million and $9.4 million of expenses related to the offering, the New Facility and financial advisory fees. After giving effect to the above transactions and assuming gross offering proceeds of between $50.0 million and $75.0 million, the combined company anticipates having between $34.0 million and $57.5 million outstanding under the New Facility (see page I-61).

III-55


Table of Contents

        If the proceeds from the offering are less than $50.0 million, we project that over the next twelve months we will need to raise funds in addition to fully incurring all available borrowings under the New Facility in order to fund the combined company's development activities and working capital needs. The estimated capital expenditures are subject to change depending on a number of factors, including the result of our exploitation and development efforts, the availability of sufficient capital resources to us, and economic and industry conditions, including prevailing and anticipated prices for oil and gas and the availability of rigs, crews, and other service providers, our financial results and our ability to obtain permits for drilling locations.

        Additionally, our combined company's reserve report at December 31, 2009 assumes we will spend approximately $51 million on development capital expenditures during calendar year 2010 to develop estimated proved nonproducing and proved undeveloped reserves. As a result of delays in the timing of the closing of the merger, $15 million of calendar year 2010 development capital expenditures have been deferred. On a combined basis, we expect to spend approximately $36 million on development capital expenditures through calendar year 2010.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

        The process of preparing financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires Resaca's management to make estimates and judgments. It is possible that materially different amounts could be recorded if these estimates and judgments change or if actual results differ from these estimates and judgments. We have identified the following critical accounting policies that have required a significant amount of estimation and judgment by Resaca and Cano and are considered to be important to the portrayal of the combined company's expected financial position and results of operations.

        Resaca accounts for its oil and gas properties under the full cost method of accounting, whereas Cano follows the successful efforts method of accounting. Following the completion of the merger, the combined company will follow the full cost method of accounting. Beginning June 30, 2010, the Ceiling Limitation (as defined below) will be calculated using the 12-month unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month prices and costs in effect held constant.

        Resaca records gains and losses from the settlement of its commodity derivative instruments in oil and gas revenues, whereas Cano records such settlements as gain or losses on derivatives on other income (loss). Following the completion of the merger, the combined company will record gains and losses from the settlement of its derivative instruments as gains or losses on derivatives on its consolidated statements of operation.

Changes in Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates for Combined Company

        Upon the completion of the merger:

Resaca's Oil and Gas Properties

        Oil and gas properties are accounted for using the full-cost method of accounting. Under this method, all productive and nonproductive costs incurred in connection with the acquisition, exploration, and development of oil and natural gas reserves are capitalized. This includes any internal costs that are directly related to acquisition, exploration and development activities, including salaries and benefits, but does not include any costs related to production, general corporate overhead or similar

III-56


Table of Contents


activities. During the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, Resaca capitalized $0.6 million and $0, respectively in overhead relating to these internal costs. During the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, Resaca capitalized $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively in overhead relating to these internal costs.

        No gains or losses are recognized upon the sale or other disposition of oil and natural gas properties except in transactions that would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves.

        Under the full cost method, the net book value of oil and natural gas properties, less related deferred income taxes, may not exceed the estimated after-tax future net revenues from proved oil and natural gas properties, discounted at 10%, which we refer to as the Ceiling Limitation. In arriving at estimated future net revenues, estimated lease operating expenses, development costs, and certain production-related and ad valorem taxes are deducted. In calculating future net revenues, prices and costs in effect at the time of the calculation are held constant indefinitely, except for changes that are fixed and determinable by existing contracts. The excess, if any, of the net book value above the Ceiling Limitation is charged to expense in the period in which it occurs and is not subsequently reinstated. Resaca prepared its ceiling test at March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009 utilizing period-end pricing, and no impairment was deemed necessary. Reserve estimates used in determining estimated future net revenues have been prepared by an independent petroleum engineer at year end.

        The costs of unevaluated oil and natural gas properties are excluded from the amortizable base until the time that either proven reserves are found or it has been determined that such properties are impaired. Resaca currently has no material capitalized costs related to unevaluated properties. All capitalized costs are included in the amortization base as of March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009.

Cano's Oil and Gas Properties and Equipment

        Cano follows the successful efforts method of accounting. Exploration expenses, including geological and geophysical expenses and delay rentals, are charged to expense. The costs of drilling and equipping exploratory wells are deferred until the company has determined whether proved reserves have been found. If proved reserves are found, the deferred costs are capitalized as part of the wells and related equipment and facilities. If no proved reserves are found, the deferred costs are charged to expense. All development activity costs are capitalized. Cano is primarily engaged in the development and acquisition of crude oil and natural gas properties. Its activities are considered development where existing proved reserves are identified prior to commencement of the project and are considered exploration if there are no proved reserves at the beginning of such project. The property costs reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets resulted from acquisition and development activities and deferred exploratory drilling costs. Capitalized overhead costs that directly relate to Cano's drilling and development activities were $1.1 million and $0.8 million, for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Cano recorded capitalized interest costs of $1.4 million and $2.5 million for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Capitalized overhead costs that directly relate to Cano's drilling and development activities were $0.6 million and $0.9 million, for the nine-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Cano recorded capitalized interest costs of $1.5 million and $0.9 million for the nine-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

        Costs for repairs and maintenance to sustain or increase production from existing producing reservoirs are charged to expense. Significant tangible equipment added or replaced that extends the useful or productive life of the property is capitalized. Costs to construct facilities or increase the productive capacity from existing reservoirs are capitalized.

        Depreciation and depletion of producing properties are computed on the unit-of-production method based on estimated proved oil and natural gas reserves. Our unit-of-production amortization

III-57


Table of Contents


rates are revised prospectively on a quarterly basis based on updated engineering information for Cano's proved developed reserves. Cano's development costs and lease and wellhead equipment are depleted based on proved developed reserves. Cano's leasehold costs are depleted based on total proved reserves. Investments in major development projects are not depleted until such project is substantially complete and producing or until impairment occurs. As of June 30, 2009 and 2008, capitalized costs related to waterflood and ASP projects that were in process and not subject to depletion amounted to $49.4 million and $47.6 million, respectively, of which $4.8 million and $13.3 million, respectively, were deferred costs related to drilling and equipping exploratory wells. As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, capitalized costs related to waterflood and ASP projects that were in process and not subject to depletion amounted to $50.4 million and $59.4 million, respectively, of which $0.0 million and $16.1 million, respectively, were deferred costs related to drilling and equipping exploratory wells.

        If conditions indicate that long-term assets may be impaired, the carrying value of Cano's properties is compared to management's future estimated pre-tax cash flow from the properties. If undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value, then the asset value is written down to fair value. Impairment of individually significant unproved properties is assessed on a property-by-property basis, and impairment of other unproved properties is assessed and amortized on an aggregate basis. The impairment assessment is affected by factors such as the results of exploration and development activities, commodity price projections, remaining lease terms, and potential shifts in Cano's business strategy.

Resaca's Proved Reserves

        Independent petroleum and geological engineers have prepared estimates of Resaca's oil and natural gas reserves at June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and at December 31, 2009. Proved reserves, estimated future net revenues and the present value of Resaca's reserves are estimated based upon a combination of historical data and estimates of future activity. Resaca has based its present value of proved reserves on spot prices on the date of the estimate instead of the unweighted average 12-month prices which will be applied in the combined company's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 under the new SEC rules. The reserve estimates are used in calculating depreciation, depletion and amortization and in the assessment of our Ceiling Limitation. Significant assumptions are required in the valuation of proved oil and natural gas reserves which, as described herein, may affect the amount at which oil and natural gas properties are recorded. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

Cano's Proved Reserves

        The term proved reserves is defined by the SEC in Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X adopted under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In general, proved reserves are the estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids that geological or engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions, i.e., prices and costs as of the date the estimate is made. Prices include consideration of changes in existing prices provided only by contractual arrangements, but not on escalations based on future conditions.

        Cano's estimates of proved reserves materially impact depletion expense. If proved reserves decline, then the rate at which it records depletion expense increases. A decline in estimates of proved reserves may result from lower prices, new information obtained from development drilling and production history; mechanical problems on our wells; and catastrophic events such as explosions, hurricanes and floods. Lower prices also may make it uneconomical to drill wells or produce from fields with high operating costs. In addition, a decline in proved reserves may impact Cano's assessment of its oil and natural gas properties for impairment.

III-58


Table of Contents

        Cano's proved reserve estimates are a function of many assumptions, all of which could deviate materially from actual results. As such, reserve estimates may vary materially from the ultimate quantities of crude oil and natural gas actually produced.

Revenue Recognition of the Combined Company

        The combined company's revenue recognition is based on the sales method of recording revenue. We do not have imbalances for natural gas sales. We recognize revenue when crude oil and natural gas quantities are delivered to or collected by the respective purchaser. Title to the produced quantities transfers to the purchaser at the time the purchaser receives or collects the quantities. Prices for such production are defined in sales contracts and are readily determinable based on publicly available information. The purchasers of such production have historically made payment for crude oil and natural gas purchases within thirty-five days of the end of each production month. We periodically review the difference between the dates of production and the dates we collect payment for such production to ensure that accounts receivable from the purchasers are collectible. The point of sale for our crude oil and natural gas production is at our applicable field tank batteries and gathering systems; therefore, we do not incur transportation costs related to our sales of crude oil and natural gas production.

Resaca's Derivatives

        Resaca periodically enters into certain financial derivative contracts utilized for non-trading purposes to hedge the impact of market price fluctuations on its forecasted oil and gas sales. Resaca follows the provisions of the ASC 815, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities ("ASC 815"), for the accounting of our hedge transactions. ASC 815 establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that all derivative instruments be recorded in the consolidated balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at fair value and requires that the changes in the fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Resaca has entered into certain over-the-counter collar contracts to hedge the cash flows of the forecasted oil and gas sales. Resaca has not chosen to document and designate these contracts as hedges. Thus, the changes in the fair value of these over-the-counter collars are reflected in earnings for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. Any gains or losses resulting from the change in fair value of our derivative instruments are recorded to unrealized gain (loss) from price risk management activities, whereas realized gains and losses from the settlement of derivative instruments are recorded in oil and gas revenues.

Cano's Derivatives

        Cano is required to hedge a portion of its production at specified prices for oil and natural gas under its senior and subordinated credit agreements. The purpose of the derivatives is to reduce Cano's exposure to declining commodity prices. By locking in minimum prices, Cano protects its cash flows which support our annual capital expenditure plans. Cano has entered into commodity derivatives that involve "costless collars" for Cano's crude oil and natural gas sales. These derivatives are recorded as derivative assets and liabilities on its consolidated balance sheets based upon their respective fair values. Cano has entered into an interest rate basis swap contract to reduce its exposure to future interest rate increases.

        Cano does not designate its derivatives as cash flow or fair value hedges. Cano does not hold or issue derivatives for speculative or trading purposes. Cano is exposed to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to its commodity and interest rate swap derivatives. Cano anticipates, however, that its counterparties will be able to fully satisfy their respective obligations under its commodity and interest rate swap derivatives contracts. Cano does not obtain collateral or

III-59


Table of Contents


other security to support its commodity derivatives contracts nor is it required to post any collateral. Cano monitors the credit standing of its counterparties to understand its credit risk.

        Changes in the fair values of Cano's derivative instruments and cash flows resulting from the settlement of its derivative instruments are recorded in earnings as gains or losses on derivatives on its consolidated statements of operations.

Asset Retirement Obligations of the Combined Company

        The combined company follows ASC 410 Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations ("ASC 410"). ASC 410 requires that an asset retirement obligation, which we refer to as ARO, associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset be recognized as a liability in the period in which a legal obligation is incurred and becomes determinable, with an offsetting increase in the carrying amount of the associated asset. Our financial statements reflect the fair value for any ARO, consisting of future plugging and abandonment expenditures related to our oil and gas properties, which can be reasonably estimated. The cost of the tangible asset, including the initially recognized ARO, is depreciated such that the cost of the ARO is recognized over the useful life of the asset. The ARO is recorded at fair value, and accretion expense will be recognized over time as the discounted liability is accreted to its expected settlement value. The fair value of the ARO is measured using expected future cash outflows discounted at the company's credit-adjusted risk-free interest rate.

        Inherent in the fair value calculation of ARO are numerous assumptions and judgments, including the ultimate settlement amounts, inflation factors, credit adjusted discount rates, timing of settlement, and changes in the legal, regulatory, environmental and political environments. To the extent future revisions to these assumptions impact the fair value of the existing ARO liability, a corresponding adjustment is made to the oil and gas property balance.

Share-Based Compensation and Expense of the Combined Company

        The combined company follows ASC 718, Share-Based Payment ("ASC 718"), for all equity awards granted to employees and directors. ASC 718 requires all companies to expense the fair value of employee stock options and other forms of share-based compensation over the requisite service period. The values of our share-based awards consisting of stock options and restricted stock require significant management assumptions during our computation. The value of stock-based compensation is impacted by its stock price, which has been highly volatile, and items that require management's judgment, such as expected lives and forfeiture rates.

New Accounting Pronouncements

        In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, which we refer to as FASB, issued a standard that established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ ("ASC") and amended the hierarchy of GAAP such that the ASC became the single source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP. The ASC did not change current GAAP, but was intended to simplify user access to all authoritative GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. All previously existing accounting standard documents were superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the ASC is considered non-authoritative. New accounting standards issued subsequent to June 30, 2009 are communicated by the FASB through Accounting Standards Updates ("ASUs"). The ASC became effective for both Resaca and Cano on July 1, 2009. This standard did not have an impact on Resaca's and Cano's financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Throughout the notes to the consolidated financial statements, references that were previously made to various former authoritative GAAP pronouncements have been conformed to the appropriate section of the ASC.

III-60


Table of Contents

ASC 260

        In June 2008, the FASB issued ASC 260 (formerly EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities "ASC 260"). ASC 260 addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and need to be included in the calculation of earnings per share under the two-class method. Under ASC 260, share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are "participating securities", and therefore should be included in computing earnings per share using the two-class method. ASC 260 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008. Resaca and Cano both adopted ASC 260 on July 1, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on Resaca's and Cano's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ASC 805

        In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC 805, Business Combinations ("ASC 805"). Under ASC 805, an entity is required to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, contractual contingencies, and contingent consideration at their fair value on the acquisition date. It further requires that acquisition-related costs be recognized separately from the acquisition and expensed as incurred. ASC 805 is effective for business combinations consummated in fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Resaca and Cano both adopted ASC 805 effective July 1, 2009.

ASC 810

        In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC 810, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51 ("ASC 810"). ASC 810 establishes accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. It also establishes a single method of accounting for changes in a parent's ownership interest in a subsidiary and requires expanded disclosures. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. Resaca and Cano both adopted ASC 810 on July 1, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on Resaca's and Cano's financial position, results of operations and cash flows. This standard will have an impact on the accounting for any acquisition of non-controlling interests after that date.

ASC 815

        In March 2008, the FASB issued ASC 815 (formerly SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—An Amendment of FASB Statement 133). ASC 815 expands the required disclosures to discuss the uses of derivative instruments; the accounting for derivative instruments and related hedged items under ASC 815, and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect the company's financial position, financial performance and cash flows. Resaca and Cano both adopted ASC 815 on July 1, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on Resaca's or Cano's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In December 2008, the FASB issued ASC 815 (formerly EITF 07-5, Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity's Own Stock). ASC 815 affects companies that have provisions in their securities purchase agreements (for warrants and convertible instruments) that reset conversion prices based upon new issuances by companies at prices below the current conversion price of said instrument. Warrants and convertible instruments with such provisions will require the embedded derivative instrument to be bifurcated and separately accounted for as a derivative. Subject to certain exceptions, our preferred stock provides for resetting the conversion price if we issue new common stock below a certain level. ASC 815 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years

III-61


Table of Contents


and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008. Resaca and Cano both adopted ASC 815 on July 1, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows as the reset conversion provision did not meet the definition of a derivative since it was not readily net-cash settled.

ASC 855

        In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 855, Subsequent Events ("ASC 855") to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date, but prior to the issuance of financial statements. Specifically, ASC 855 sets forth: (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; (2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and (3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. ASC 855 is effective for financial statements issued for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. Resaca and Cano both adopted ASC 855 on June 30, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on Resaca's or Cano's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting

        On December 31, 2008, the SEC issued Release No. 33-8995, "Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting," which revises disclosure requirements for oil and gas companies. In addition to changing the definition and disclosure requirements for oil and gas reserves, the new rules change the requirements for determining oil and gas reserve quantities. These rules permit the use of new technologies to determine proved reserves under certain criteria and allow companies to disclose their probable and possible reserves. The new rules also require companies to report the independence and qualifications of their reserve preparer or auditor and file reports when a third party is relied upon to prepare reserve estimates or conducts a reserve audit. The new rules also require that oil and gas reserves be reported and the full cost ceiling limitation be calculated using a twelve-month average price rather than period-end prices. The new rules are effective for annual reports on Forms 10-K for fiscal years ending on or after December 31, 2009. Early adoption of the new rules is prohibited. Additionally, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on oil and gas reserve estimation and disclosures, as set forth in ASU No. 2010-03, Extractive Activities—Oil and Gas (Topic 932), to align with the requirements of the SEC's revised rules. The Company will begin complying with the disclosure requirements in our annual report for the year ending June 30, 2010. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of these rules on our consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2010-06

        In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820). ASU 2010-06 Subtopic 820-10 provides new guidance on improving disclosures about fair value measurements. The new standard requires some new disclosures and clarifies some existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurement. Specifically, the new standard will now require: (a) a reporting entity should disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for transfers and (b) in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unoberservable inputs, a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements. In addition, the new standard clarifies the requirements of the following existing disclosures: (a) for purposes of reporting fair value measurements for each class of assets and liabilities, a reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities and (b) a reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for

III-62


Table of Contents


both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The new standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted. The adoption of the requirements of this standard in the quarter ended March 31, 2010 did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. We are still in the process of evaluating the impact, if any, on our consolidated financial statements, of the standard requirements applicable for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010.

The Combined Company's Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

        The combined company's operations are exposed to market risks primarily as a result of changes in commodity prices and interest rates.

Interest Rate Risk

        The New Facility is subject to risks associated with interest rate fluctuations as described therein. We do not plan to enter into any derivative instruments to mitigate this risk. The New Facility is not subject to a LIBOR floor. Assuming $50 million is outstanding under the New Facility, if there is an increase in the interest rate of 1%, Resaca's total interest cost will increase by $0.5 million annually.

Commodity Risk

        Resaca's revenues are derived from the sale of our crude oil and natural gas production. The prices for oil and natural gas are extremely volatile and sometimes experience large fluctuations as a result of relatively small changes in supplies, weather conditions, economic conditions and government actions. Pursuant to Resaca's credit agreements discussed in Note D to Resaca's Consolidated Financial Statements, Resaca is required to maintain its existing commodity derivative contracts, all of which have BP as its counterparty. Under the terms of the CIT Facility, Resaca's lenders may require Resaca to enter into additional hedges. Under the CIT Facility, should Resaca choose to enter into commodity derivative contracts to mitigate future price risk, Resaca cannot enter into contracts for greater than 80% of its crude oil and natural gas production volumes attributable to proved producing reserves for a given month. Therefore, for Resaca's hedged production, Resaca will receive at least the floor prices. All of Resaca's oil derivative contracts are based on WTS prices and Resaca's gas derivative contracts are based on Waha prices. All of Resaca's derivatives contracts with BP will be novated to one or more lenders under the New Facility. As of June 30, 2009, Resaca maintained the following commodity derivative contracts:

Time Period
  Floor
Oil Price
  Ceiling
Oil Price
  Barrels
Per Day
  Floor
Gas Price
  Ceiling
Gas Price
  Mcf
per Day
  Barrels of
Equivalent
Oil per Day
 

7/1/09 - 12/31/09

  $ 58.00   $ 66.30     362   $ 6.30   $ 11.50     658     471  

1/1/10 - 12/31/10

  $ 58.00   $ 66.30     329   $ 6.30   $ 11.50     658     438  

1/1/11 - 5/31/11

  $ 58.00   $ 66.30     331   $ 6.30   $ 11.00     329     384  

6/1/11 - 12/31/11

  $ 60.00   $ 77.00     296   $ 5.50   $ 6.90     362     356  

1/1/12 - 6/30/12

  $ 60.00   $ 77.00     197                 197  

III-63


Table of Contents

        In addition, as of June 30, 2009, Resaca maintained two fixed price commodity swap contracts, which are summarized in the table below.

Time Period
  Fixed
Gas Price
  Mcf
Per Day
  Barrels of
Equivalent
Oil per Day
 

1/1/11 - 5/31/11

  $ 6.10     33     5  

1/1/12 - 6/30/12

  $ 6.30     247     41  

        Assuming that the prices that Resaca received for its crude oil and natural gas production are above the floor prices, based on actual fiscal year sales volumes for the year ended June 30, 2009, a 10% decline in the prices Resaca received for its crude oil and natural gas production would have had an approximate $1.4 million negative impact on its revenues.

        Resaca computed its mark-to-market valuations used for its commodity derivatives based on assumptions regarding forward prices, volatility and the time value of money. Resaca compared its valuations to its counterparty's valuations to further validate its mark-to-market valuations. During the year ended June 30, 2009, Resaca recognized an unrealized gain on commodity derivatives in its consolidated statements of operations amounting to $11.5 million. During the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, Resaca recognized unrealized losses on commodity derivatives in its consolidated statements of operations amounting to $12.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively. During the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, Resaca recognized an unrealized loss of $0.8 million and an unrealized gain of $15.8 million, respectively, on commodity derivatives in its consolidated statements of operations.

        If crude oil prices fell $1 below Resaca's hedged crude oil price floor, Resaca would receive approximately $0.1 million annually due to having the crude oil price floor hedge in place. If natural gas prices fell $1 below Resaca's hedged natural gas price floor, Resaca would receive approximately $0.2 million annually due to having the natural gas price floor hedge in place.

        Resaca has not entered into any additional commodity derivative contracts since June 30, 2009.

        Pursuant to the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement and Subordinated Credit Agreement discussed in Note 6 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements, Cano is required to maintain its existing commodity derivative contracts, all of which have UBNA as its counterparty. Cano has no obligation to enter into commodity derivative contracts in the future. Should Cano choose to enter into commodity derivative contracts to mitigate future price risk, it cannot enter into contracts for greater than 85% of its crude oil and natural gas production volumes attributable to proved producing reserves for a given month. Therefore, for the hedged production, Cano will receive at least the floor prices. All of Cano's derivative contracts will remain in place with the combined company. As of June 30, 2009, Cano maintained the following commodity derivative contracts:

Time Period
  Floor
Oil Price
  Ceiling
Oil Price
  Barrels
Per Day
  Floor
Gas Price
  Ceiling
Gas Price
  Mcf
per Day
  Barrels of
Equivalent
Oil per Day
 

7/1/09 - 12/31/09

  $ 80.00   $ 110.90     367   $ 7.75   $ 10.60     1,667     644  

7/1/09 - 12/31/09

  $ 85.00   $ 104.40     233   $ 8.00   $ 10.15     1,133     422  

1/1/10 - 12/31/10

  $ 80.00   $ 108.20     333   $ 7.75   $ 9.85     1,567     594  

1/1/10 - 12/31/10

  $ 85.00   $ 101.50     233   $ 8.00   $ 9.40     1,033     406  

1/1/11 - 3/31/11

  $ 80.00   $ 107.30     333   $ 7.75   $ 11.60     1,467     578  

1/1/11 - 3/31/11

  $ 85.00   $ 100.50     200   $ 8.00   $ 11.05     967     361  

        Assuming that the prices that Cano receives for its crude oil and natural gas production are above the floor prices, based on Cano's actual fiscal year sales volumes for the year ended June 30, 2009, a

III-64


Table of Contents


10% decline in the prices Cano receives for its crude oil and natural gas production would have had an approximate $2.5 million negative impact on its revenues.

        Cano computed its mark-to-market valuations used for its commodity derivatives based on assumptions regarding forward prices, volatility and the time value of money. Cano compared its valuations to its counterparties' valuations to further validate our mark-to-market valuations. During the year ended June 30, 2009, Cano recognized an unrealized gain on commodity derivatives in its consolidated statements of operations amounting to $36.8 million. During the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, Cano recognized an unrealized loss on commodity derivatives in its consolidated statements of operations amounting to $29.4 million and $1.8 million, respectively.

        If crude oil prices fell $1 below Cano's hedged crude oil price floor, Cano would receive approximately $0.2 million annually due to having the crude oil price floor hedge in place. If natural gas prices fell $1 below Cano's hedged natural gas price floor, Cano would receive approximately $1.1 million annually due to having the natural gas price floor hedge in place.

        On September 11, 2009, Cano entered into two fixed price commodity swap contracts with its counterparty—Natixis, which is one of its lenders under the senior credit agreement. The fixed price swaps are based on West Texas Intermediate NYMEX prices and are summarized in the table below.

Time Period
  Fixed
Oil Price
  Barrels
Per Day
 

4/1/11 - 12/31/11

  $ 75.90     700  

1/1/12 - 12/31/12

  $ 77.25     700  

        Cano has not entered into any additional derivative contracts since September 11, 2009.

III-65


Table of Contents


MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF CANO

        The following discussion and analysis prepared by Cano should be read in conjunction with "Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Data," "Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data of Cano" and the financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this proxy statement. The following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements are dependent upon events, risks and uncertainties that may be outside our control. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, the volatility of oil and gas prices, production timing and volumes, estimates of proved reserves, operating costs and capital expenditures, economic and competitive conditions, regulatory changes and other uncertainties, as well as those factors discussed below and elsewhere in this proxy statement, particularly in "Risk Factors" and "Cautionary Statements Concerning Forward-Looking Statements," all of which are difficult to predict. As a result of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed may not occur.

Overview

Introduction

        Cano is an independent oil and natural gas company. Cano's strategy is to exploit its current undeveloped reserves and acquire, where economically prudent, assets suitable for enhanced oil recovery at a low cost. Cano intends to convert its proved undeveloped and/or unproved reserves into proved producing reserves by applying water, gas and/or chemical flooding and other EOR techniques. Cano's assets are located onshore U.S. in Texas, New Mexico and Oklahoma.

        During Cano's first three years of operations, Cano's primary objective was to achieve growth through acquiring existing, mature crude oil and natural gas fields. The last two years Cano has focused on building the infrastructure and commencing waterflood operations in Cano's two largest properties, Panhandle and Cato. These development activities are more clearly described below under "—Drilling Capital Development and Operating Activities Update."

        Cano believes its portfolio of crude oil and natural gas properties provides opportunities to apply its operational strategy. Additionally, it will continue to evaluate acquisitions that are consistent with its operational strategy.

        Overall estimated proved oil and natural gas reserves decreased by 4.1 MMBOE, or 7.7%, to 49.1 MMBOE as of June 30, 2009, as compared to 53.2 MMBOE as of June 30, 2008. Cano's June 30, 2009 proved reserves of 49.1 MMBOE, were comprised 7.7 MMBOE of PDP, 2.4 MMBOE of PDNP, and 39.0 MMBOE of PUD. Crude oil reserves accounted for 79% of Cano's total reserves at June 30, 2009. Adjusting for Cano's sale of wells in the Panhandle Properties during January 2010, Cano's adjusted proved reserves at June 30, 2009 would be 48.6 MMBOE, which comprised 7.2 MMBOE of PDP, 2.4 MMBOE of PDNP, and 39.0 MMBOE of PUD, and crude oil reserves accounted for 80.2% of total proved reserves. Additional detail of Cano's proved reserves is presented in "—Business and Properties—Cano's Proved Reserves."

        At Cano's Cato Properties, Cano added approximately 2,623 MBOE of new reserves in extensions and discoveries due to better than expected initial waterflood response in the Phase I area of the project. Cato's production increased from roughly 200 BOEPD to over 400 BOEPD as injection into the waterflood pattern commenced in the 19 injection wells and direct crude oil production increases occurred in 29 pattern producing wells. Ultimately, this led to the conversion of approximately 1,181 MBOE of PUD to PDP reserves. Approximately 724 MBOE of prior year PUD to PDP reserve conversions at Cano's Panhandle Properties waterflood were reclassified back to PUD based upon actual response realized through June 30, 2009 (which has been slower than originally estimated).

III-66


Table of Contents


Offsetting the positive extensions and discoveries at Cano's Cato Properties (2,623 MBOE) were the divestitures of Cano's Corsicana and Pantwist Properties, as discussed in Note 8 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements, totaling 2,554 MBOE, the impairment of 2,269 MBOE at Cano's Desdemona Barnett Shale Properties due to the decline in commodity prices during the year ended June 30, 2009, which we refer to as the 2009 fiscal year, as discussed in Note 14 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements, and other revisions primarily driven by the decline in commodity prices and forecast changes which changed the estimated economic lives of Cano's assets (1,435 MBOE). A summary of the year-on-year changes to Cano's proved reserves is shown in the following table:

Summary of Changes in Proved Reserves
  MBOE  

Reserves at June 30, 2008

    53,189  

Extensions and Discoveries

    2,623  

Forecast Revisions

    (1,435 )

Financial Revisions (impairment)

    (2,269 )

Sales of Assets

    (2,554 )

Production

    (457 )
       

Reserves at June 30, 2009

    49,097  

Sale of certain wells in Panhandle Properties

    (512 )
       

Adjusted Reserves at June 30, 2009

    48,585  
       

        Reserves were estimated using crude oil and natural gas prices and production and development costs in effect on June 30, 2009. On June 30, 2009, crude oil and natural gas prices were $69.89 per barrel and $3.71 per MMBtu, respectively. The values reported may not necessarily reflect the fair market value of the reserves.

Drilling Capital Development and Operating Activities Update

        For the 2009 fiscal year, Cano incurred $52.6 million of capital expenditures ($56.2 million spent) to develop its existing fields. The $3.6 million difference between the $52.6 million incurred and the $56.2 million spent is primarily timing differences related to expenditures incurred during the 2008 fiscal year and the payments for those capital expenditures during the 2008 fiscal year. At June 30, 2009, Cano had accrued capital expenditures of $1.9 million that were paid during the 2010 fiscal year.

        The goal for the 2009 fiscal year was to convert existing PUD reserves to PDP reserves and increase production. Cano drilled and completed 18 wells: four ASP observation wells at the Nowata Field, five wells in the Panhandle Field (four Harvey Unit waterflood development wells and one Cockrell ranch infill well), and nine wells at Cato (six waterflood producers and three waterflood injectors).

        For the year ending June 30, 2010, which we refer to as the 2010 fiscal year, Cano's Board of Directors has approved a capital development budget of $13.9 million as follows:

        Of the $13.9 million budgeted development capital expenditures, Cano has incurred $8.0 million through December 31, 2009. Cano's 2010 fiscal year capital development program does not include the drilling of new wells. The financing of Cano's capital expenditures is discussed below under "—Liquidity and Capital Resources." The following reviews Cano's capital development activity during the 2009 fiscal year and planned activity during the 2010 fiscal year.

III-67


Table of Contents

        Cato Properties.    Proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 attributable to the Cato Properties were 16.0 MMBOE, of which 1.9 MMBOE were PDP, 0.5 MMBOE were PDNP and 13.6 MMBOE were PUD. These properties include roughly 20,000 acres across three fields in Chavez and Roosevelt Counties, New Mexico. The prime asset is the roughly 15,000 acre Cato Field, which produces from the historically prolific San Andres formation, which has been successfully waterflooded in the Permian Basin for over 30 years. There were two successful waterflood pilots conducted in the field in the 1970's by Shell and Amoco.

        Cano has experienced encouraging initial waterflood response at the Cato Field. The first phase of development (Phase I) includes 19 water injection wells, which we refer to as injectors, and 29 producing wells, which we refer to as producers. Once the injection permits were received in September 2008, Cano began injecting 7,000 BWIPD. As Cano continued injecting water into the field, waterflood production has grown from five producers during December 2008 offsetting a prior Amoco waterflood pilot to 29 producers experiencing production as of June 30, 2009. During January 2009, Cano increased the injection rate to approximately 12,000 BWIPD. During February 2009, Cano expanded the footprint of Phase 1 of the Cato waterflood from 550 to roughly 640 acres and announced an increased capital expenditures budget to $49.8 million, of which $27.0 million was intended for the Cato Properties. Cano currently has ten sub-pumps operating in the field and plan to install additional sub-pumps to support increasing production and corresponding higher levels of fluid production. The sustained production gains at the Cato Properties are the result of an earlier than expected waterflood production response.

        The 2009 fiscal year drilling program at Cato, which comprised drilling nine wells (six waterflood producers and three waterflood injectors), was completed in October 2008. Normal production declines were experienced outside of the Phase I waterflooded area, but these declines were more than offset by increased production from the waterflood.

        At June 30, 2009, Cano booked proved reserves extensions and discoveries at Cato as Phase I results were better than initially expected. Field production increased from roughly 200 BOEPD to over 400 BOEPD after Cano commenced injection into 19 injection wells of the waterflood pattern which led to increased crude oil production in 29 producers. When Cano increased the waterflood footprint from 550 acres to 640 acres, the rate of water injection per acre decreased leading to a temporary decrease in production. Cano added approximately 2.6 MMBOE of new reserves based on the responses experienced through June 30, 2009. Additionally, 1.1 MMBOE of PUD reserves were reclassified to PDP reserves as a result of the responses experienced in Phase I. Cano plans to increase the number of injection wells and enlarge the waterflood footprint in the 2010 fiscal year. Net production at Cato averaged 316 BOEPD in June 2009.

        Cano's 2010 fiscal year development capital plan includes expanding the waterflood footprint from 640 acres to approximately 1,000 acres by adding three new injection wells, which were put into service in the second quarter of its 2010 fiscal year. Cano has identified a new source of water in a non-productive formation within its acreage, and has confirmed that the water well is capable of producing 2,500 to 3,000 barrels of water per day. This new water source formation has been penetrated in a number of existing wellbores in the Cato Properties and confirms the reservoir continuity necessary to validate it as a reliable water source for future expansion of the Cato waterflood. As Cano develops this new water source, it will be able to increase the waterflood footprint without decreasing the injection rate at its existing injectors, which should enable it to maintain production from existing producing wells at current levels. Cano averaged 14,000 BWIPD during the quarter ended September 30, 2009. Cano experienced a decrease to 12,000 BWIPD during its second and third quarters as it measured increasing injection pressures in the northern part of the flood area and was required, under its existing waterflood permit, to reduce the injection rate in these wells. On May 6, 2010, Cano received administrative approval from the New Mexico Oil and Gas Conservation Division to increase injection pressures at the 14 active wells to its current physical plant capabilities of

III-68


Table of Contents


approximately 21,000 BWIPD. Cano expects to see increasing fluid production rates and corresponding increasing oil rates as injection rates increase. Further development plans for the Cato Properties include behind-pipe recompletions, restoration of production from the Tom-Tom and Tomahawk fields, and the drilling of a Morrow formation test well. These development plans are contemplated to begin after the completion of the merger.

        Net production at the Cato Properties for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was 241 BOEPD, which was 11 BOEPD lower as compared to 252 BOEPD for the quarter ended December 31, 2009. The 11 BOEPD decrease resulted from the reduction in injected water and redistribution of water injection at the waterflood. Net production at the Cato Properties for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 was 264 BOEPD. Net production at the Cato Properties for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 was 313 BOEPD and 284 BOEPD, respectively.

        Panhandle Properties.    Proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 attributable to the Panhandle Properties were 28.9 MMBOE, of which 3.5 MMBOE were PDP and 25.4 MMBOE were PUD. Adjusting for the sale of wells in the Panhandle Properties during January 2010, the adjusted proved reserves at the Panhandle Properties would be 28.4 MMBOE, which comprised 3.0 MMBOE of PDP and 25.4 MMBOE of PUD. These properties include roughly 20,000 acres in Carson, Gray and Hutchinson Counties, Texas. They are delineated in thirty-three leases—the largest of which are Cockrell Ranch, Pond, Harvey, Mobil Fee, Cooper, Block and Schafer Ranch.

        During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, Cano maintained its average daily water injection rate at the Cockrell Ranch Unit (our first Panhandle Properties waterflood) at roughly 75,000 barrels per day. This resulted in increasing Cano's average daily production at the Cockrell Ranch Unit from approximately 80-100 net BOEPD between June and December 2008 to maintaining 100-120 net BOEPD production through June 30, 2009. While crude oil production continues to increase at Cockrell Ranch, the gains are below Cano's expectations. Based on actual performance of the waterflood through June 30, 2009, Cano reclassified 724 MBOE of PDP reserves back to PUD at June 30, 2009. After this reclassification, the remaining amount of the prior year conversion of PUD to PDP reserves is 674 MBOE.

        In the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Cano retained an independent engineering firm to assist it with reservoir analysis and simulation modeling at the Cockrell Ranch unit. Based on this engineering firm's recommendations, Cano established a controlled water injection pattern to gauge the effects of optimizing water injection into the highest remaining crude oil saturation intervals of the Brown Dolomite formation. Cano is essentially performing a "Mini-Flood" in the key target interval at the Cockrell Ranch unit. The result of this field observation, coupled with rigorous reservoir simulation modeling, is expected to demonstrate an optimal pattern for waterflooding the balance of the Cockrell Ranch unit with an increasingly predicable production profile. Moreover, the field observation and modeling results will improve the planning of future development programs for the remaining leases located within its Panhandle Properties. To isolate the observed wells, Cano had temporarily shut-in production during most of the quarter ended September 30, 2009, which reduced Panhandle production by 25 net BOEPD. All production that was shut-in for the controlled injection project was restored on September 28, 2009. Cano has experienced positive results from the controlled injection project. Oil production from wells in the affected area has increased to at or above target levels of 8-12 BOEPD on a per well basis. These results, coupled with the accompanying reservoir simulation modeling, should allow a comprehensive analysis of the potential for the Cockrell Ranch Unit. Results of the studies should be completed in the third calendar quarter of 2010.

        Cano's original 2009 fiscal year waterflood capital development plan for the Panhandle Properties included six separate mini-floods on reduced well spacing to enable Cano to accelerate field development. Tighter well-spacing and smaller development patterns should accelerate permitting and response times, allowing a larger development footprint over a greater acreage position. The amended

III-69


Table of Contents


2009 capital development plan provided for the development of only one mini-flood phase through June 2009 (the Harvey Unit). The Harvey Unit had its waterflood permit application approved by the Texas Railroad Commission on October 20, 2008. The Harvey Unit mini-flood consists of six injection wells and 13 producing wells (which required four new wells to be drilled among the existing wells at the field). The drilling of the four replacement injector wells was completed on January 5, 2009, thus completing the mini-flood pattern. Cano initiated injection at the Harvey Unit on March 30, 2009 at a rate of 2,500 barrels per day. During the 2009 fiscal year, Cano received approval of the mini-flood permits at the Pond Lease and at the Olive-Cooper Lease. As a result of the reduction in Cano's capital plan and a focus on Cano's Cato Properties, Cano slowed the filing of Panhandle mini-flood permits. Cano now expects to file the appropriate waterflood permits for the remaining three mini-floods by the quarter ending December 31, 2009. Net production at the Panhandle Properties for June 2009 was 627 BOEPD.

        Net production at the Panhandle Properties, as adjusted for the sale of certain Panhandle Properties, for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 was 481 BOEPD and 479 BOEPD, respectively. During the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano constructed gathering lines to redirect natural gas production from Eagle Rock to DCP. As of March 31, 2010, Cano had redirected approximately 80% of the natural gas production previously delivered to Eagle Rock to DCP. Net production at the Panhandle Properties for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 was 498 BOEPD and 485 BOEPD, respectively.

        In November 2009, at the Cockrell Ranch Unit, we performed an injection test of an ASG recipe designed by UT. The test involved injecting the ASG stream at the Cockrell 1R producing well. The five-day test allowed Cano to monitor surface pressure and rate measurements and analyze flow-back production data. Results from the test will allow Cano to evaluate ASG tertiary recovery potential for the Brown Dolomite reservoir in the Panhandle Properties.

        Desdemona Properties.    Proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 attributable to the Desdemona Properties were 1.4 MMBOE, of which 0.1 MMBOE were PDP and 1.3 MMBOE were PDNP. Approximately 1.3 MMBOE of the reserves were attributable to the Duke Sand reservoir. As of June 30, 2009, Cano had no proved reserves associated with its Barnett Shale natural gas wells.

III-70


Table of Contents

        Net production for June 2009 at the Desdemona Properties was 54 BOEPD.

        During July 2009, Cano shut-in its Barnett Shale natural gas wells based upon the current and near-term outlook of natural gas prices and production from the Barnett Shale wells on a per-well basis.

        Cano is in the midst of a project to return to production previously shut-in gas wells from the Duke Sand formation. Cano converted approximately 311 MBOE of previously PDNP reserves to PDP reserves with the RTP of 12 previously shut-in wells in December 2009. Production increased from 46 BOEPD for the second quarter ending December 31, 2009 to 69 BOEPD for the three months ended March 31, 2010 without the benefit of selling any NGLs. Cano plans to RTP the remaining 13 wells during the quarter ended June 30, 2010. Production from all of the RTP gas wells, including associated NGL recovery from Cano's gas plant, is expected to be approximately 10-20 Mcfe per day for each gas well returned to production. Cano restarted its gas plant in April 2010 and expects to realize the full benefit of these produced volumes in May 2010.

        During the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano drilled one new well to a total depth of 3,650 feet to test the Marble Falls, Atoka and Strawn Sand formations. Cano has completed the new well in the Strawn Sand formation at a depth of 1,750 feet. The well had initial production, on April 16, 2010, of 20 BOPD, 50 MCFPD and 450 BWPD. Cano is currently evaluating three offset locations for future Strawn Sand development in the Desdemona Properties.

        Net production at the Desdemona Properties for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 was 69 BOEPD and 51 BOEPD, respectively. Net production at the Desdemona Properties for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 was 55 BOEPD and 61 BOEPD, respectively. During July 2009, Cano shut-in its Barnett Shale natural gas wells based upon the then current outlook for natural gas prices from the Barnett Shale wells.

        Nowata Properties.    Cano's ASP Pilot has been in full operation since December 2007. Through June 30, 2009, Cano injected close to .40 PVI of ASP and polymer flush. Cano drilled and completed four observation wells in December 2008, to enable it to test flood-front results in the pilot project. Cano completed injecting its polymer flush during June 2009. Analyses of the ASP Pilot results are complete. While Cano achieved some positive reaction to the surfactant in the reservoir, it was determined that the ASP recipe designed by an outside consultant would not achieve viable economics to justify commercial project development. The recipe did not take into consideration certain factors which lead to significant absorption of the surfactant in the reservoir rock. Cano has since retained the UT to study the ASP Pilot results at Nowata and develop an alternate recipe. Using the actual results of the ASP Pilot and performing additional coreflood studies, UT believes they have developed a new and optimal recipe that shows exceptional recoveries can be achieved at Nowata on a commercial basis. UT's work demonstrates that there is another solution to designing an optimal plan of development going forward. Cano believes that the lessons learned in regard to actual plant design and operation, fluid handling, injection pressures and rates, and producing fluid properties, may benefit full field development in the future and similar projects that Cano may undertake at its other properties.

        As a result of the non-commercial results from the ASP pilot, Cano recorded a $5.0 million pre-tax exploration expense during December 2009. There were no proved reserves associated with the ASP pilot project prior to the beginning of this pilot project.

        Net production for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 was 222 BOEPD and 219 BOEPD, respectively. Net production for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 was 227 BOEPD and 222 BOEPD, respectively.

III-71


Table of Contents

        Davenport Properties.    Proved reserves as of June 30, 2009 attributable to the Davenport Properties were 1.3 MMBOE, of which 0.7 MMBOE were PDP and 0.6 MMBOE were PDNP. Net production for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 was 78 BOEPD and 75 BOEPD, respectively. Net production for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 was 70 BOEPD for each time period.

Industry Conditions

        Cano operates in a competitive environment for (i) acquiring properties, (ii) marketing oil and natural gas and (iii) attracting trained personnel. Some of Cano's competitors possess and employ financial resources substantially greater than Cano's and some of Cano's competitors employ more technical personnel. Some of Cano's competitors may be able to pay more for productive oil and natural gas properties and exploratory prospects and to evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of properties and prospects than what Cano's financial or technical resources permit. Cano's ability to acquire additional properties and to find and develop reserves in the future will depend on Cano's ability to identify, evaluate and obtain capital for investment in the oil and natural gas industry.

        Cano believes significant acquisition opportunities exist and will continue to exist as major energy companies and larger independents continue to focus their attention and resources toward the discovery and development of large fields and smaller companies are faced with decreasing margins and access to capital.

Our Strategy

        EOR techniques involve significant capital investment and an extended period of time, generally a year or longer, until production increases. Generally, surfactant-polymer injection is regarded as more risky as compared to waterflood operations. Cano's ability to successfully convert PUD reserves to PDP reserves will be contingent upon Cano's ability to obtain future financing and/or raise additional capital. Further, there are inherent uncertainties associated with the production of crude oil and natural gas, as well as price volatility.

Merger with Resaca

        On September 30, 2009, Cano and Resaca announced that their respective boards of directors had approved an agreement and plan of merger that provides for the acquisition of Cano by Resaca. Closing is anticipated before the end of June 2010, however, it is possible that factors outside of either company's control could require Resaca or Cano to complete the merger at a later time or not to complete it at all.

III-72


Table of Contents

        Under the terms of the merger agreement, holders of Cano common stock will receive 2.1 shares (or 0.42 shares after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split) of Resaca common stock for each share of Cano common stock held, and the existing holders of Cano preferred stock will receive one share of preferred stock of Resaca for each share of Cano preferred stock held. The merger is intended to be a tax-free transaction to the Cano stockholders to the extent the Cano common stockholders receive Resaca common stock and the Cano preferred stockholders receive Resaca preferred stock in the merger.

        Consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement is conditioned upon, among other things, (1) approval of the holders of the Cano common stock and Cano preferred stock, (2) approval of the holders of Resaca common stock, (3) the listing of Resaca common stock on the NYSE Amex, (4) the refinancing of existing bank debt of Resaca and Cano, (5) the receipt of required regulatory approvals, (6) Resaca's application for readmission to the AIM, which is anticipated to occur simultaneous with the closing of the merger, and (7) the effectiveness of a registration statement relating to the shares of Resaca common stock to be issued in the merger. The merger agreement contains certain termination rights for each of Cano and Resaca, including the right to terminate the merger agreement to enter into a Superior Proposal (as such term is defined in the merger agreement). In the event of a termination of the merger agreement under certain specified circumstances described in the merger agreement, one party will be required to pay the other party a termination fee of $3.5 million.

        Cano entered into stock voting agreements with 75% of the holders of Cano's Preferred Stock on various dates between September and November 2009. Each stock voting agreement contains the same terms and provides, among other things, that each of the preferred holders will vote all its shares of Cano preferred stock (a) in favor of the Series D Amendment, (b) in favor of adoption of the merger agreement, and (c) in accordance with the recommendation of our Board of Directors in connection with any Target Acquisition Proposal (as such term is defined in the merger agreement). The Series D Amendment generally provides that the holders of Cano preferred stock shall have no rights arising from the proposed merger with Resaca (including any right to require us to redeem their shares of Cano preferred stock) other than the right to receive the merger consideration specified in the merger agreement. To be effective, the Series D Amendment must be approved by the holders of a majority of the shares of Cano preferred stock, voting as a separate class, and by the holders of a majority of the shares of Cano common stock, voting as a separate class, and then filed by Cano with the Secretary of State of Delaware.

        On October 20, 2009, Cano entered into a Stock Voting Agreement with S. Jeffrey Johnson, its Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of its board of directors, which provides, among other things, that Mr. Johnson will vote all of his shares of Cano's stock in favor of the Series D Amendment. Mr. Johnson owns approximately 3.6% of the Cano preferred stock. During the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano paid Mr. Johnson a cash preferred dividend payment of approximately $59,000.

        On January 27, 2010, Resaca filed a registration statement regarding the offering, which is expected to close in conjunction with the closing of the merger.

        On April 26, 2010, Resaca received a firm commitment for the New Facility with UBNA and Natixis. UBNA is the administrative agent and UBNA and Natixis are issuing lenders of the New Facility. The New Facility will mature on July 1, 2012 and is expected to have an initial and current borrowing base of $90.0 million based upon the combined company's estimated proved reserves.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

        Cano's primary sources of capital and liquidity have been issuance of securities, borrowings under its credit agreements, and cash flows from operating activities. These sources are discussed in greater detail below.

III-73


Table of Contents

        For the twelve months ended June 30, 2009, Cano's primary sources of cash were receipts from the sale of crude oil and natural gas production, issuances of Cano common stock, net borrowings under its credit agreements, sales of oil and gas properties, payments for in-the-money commodity derivative contracts, settlements from third parties and the W.O. Settlement pertaining to the Panhandle fire litigation as discussed in Note 17 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements. Cano's cash receipts from sales are discussed in greater detail under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Cano—Results of Operations—Operating Revenues." The non-revenue sources of cash are discussed in greater detail below:

        During the twelve month period ended June 30, 2009, Cano's cash outlays were primarily for:

III-74


Table of Contents

        As discussed under "—Drilling Capital Development and Operating Activities," Cano has $52.6 million of capital expenditures during the twelve month period ended June 30, 2009. $4.8 million of the incurred $52.6 million pertains to secondary and tertiary exploration activities (new projects where no secondary or tertiary reserves have previously been recorded). As of June 30, 2009, Cano has implemented one tertiary exploration project that has existing reserves associated with secondary recovery activities—the ASP tertiary recovery pilot project at the Nowata Properties. This project is considered exploratory as it entails more risk compared to Cano's development activities where proved secondary or tertiary reserves exist since this project did not have proved tertiary reserves prior to its implementation. Cano estimates the crude oil price necessary to sustain the long-term economic viability of this project is approximately $45-$50 per barrel. This price could vary based on several factors, including actual recovery rates and chemical costs.

Liquidity

        At March 31, 2010, Cano had cash and cash equivalents of $0.9 million. Cano had negative working capital of $65.3 million, which includes $65.0 million of long-term debt that was shown as a current liability. Excluding the current portion of long-term debt totaling $65.0 million, Cano had negative working capital of $0.3 million. For the nine-month period ended March 31, 2010, Cano had cash flow used in operations of $1.1 million and it incurred $1.7 million of merger related expenses.

        On January 27, 2010, Cano sold its interests in certain oil and gas properties located in the Texas Panhandle for net proceeds of $6.3 million. Cano used a portion of the net proceeds to pay down its outstanding debt. As of May 28, 2010, Cano had available borrowing capacity of $1.1 million and a cash balance of $0.1 million.

        The lenders under Cano's two credit agreements agreed to waive the covenants relating to its leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio for the quarters ended December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010, as Cano would have been out of compliance with such covenants as of both dates. Should the merger with Resaca not close by June 30, 2010, based upon its nine-month operating results through March 31, 2010, it is likely that Cano will not be in compliance with one or more of its financial covenants under its credit agreements as of June 30, 2010. Accordingly, since Cano did not receive covenant relief beyond March 31, 2010, its debt is classified as a current liability. Further, Cano will seek covenant relief from its lenders, though there can be no assurance that it will be successful in obtaining such relief. If Cano is unable to obtain relief from its lenders, it will need to raise additional capital through the issuance of equity or the sale of a substantial portion of its assets. There can be no assurance as to funding Cano would be able to raise, if any, in connection with any such equity issuances or asset sales. In addition, any such equity issuances could be highly dilutive to Cano's existing stockholders and any such asset sales would require the consent of its lenders and, potentially, the holders of its outstanding common and preferred stock.

        Cano's credit agreements include change of control provisions which require Cano to refinance the credit agreements at the close of the merger. On February 3, 2010, Resaca received a commitment for a new $200.0 million revolving senior secured credit facility with UBNA for the combined company.

        Cano believes the combination of cash on hand, cash flow generated from operations, and available borrowing capacity, as of May 28, 2010, will be sufficient to fund its operating and capital activities through the closing of the merger.

        Historically, Cano's primary sources of capital and liquidity have been issuance of equity securities, borrowings under its credit agreements, and cash flows from operating activities. To develop Cano's reserves as reported in its December 31, 2009 reserve report, it will require access to the capital markets in three of the next five years, as the projected capital expenditures are greater than projected cash flow from operations through December 2014.

III-75


Table of Contents

Credit Agreements

        At March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, the outstanding amount due under Cano's credit agreements was $65.0 million and $55.7 million, respectively. The $65.0 million at March 31, 2010, consisted of outstanding borrowings under the senior and subordinated credit agreements of $50.0 million and $15.0 million, respectively. At March 31, 2010, the average interest rates under the senior and subordinated credit agreements were 2.75% and 6.26%, respectively. A portion of the net proceeds from the offering and borrowings under the New Facility will be used to repay, in full, the balances outstanding under these facilities. Upon repayment of these facilities, they will be terminated. The ability to make the aforementioned repayment of these facilities and the ability to reduce overall indebtedness for the combined company is dependent upon the amount of the proceeds of the offering.

        Cano's long-term debt consists of its senior credit facility (current borrowing base of $60.0 million) and its subordinated credit agreement ($15.0 million availability), which is discussed in greater detail below.

        On December 17, 2008, Cano finalized the $120.0 million Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement with UBNA and Natixis. UBNA is the Administrative Agent and Issuing Lender of the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement. The initial and current borrowing base, based upon our proved reserves, is $60.0 million. Pursuant to the terms of the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement, the borrowing base is to be redetermined based upon Cano's reserves at June 30, 2009. Thereafter, there will be a scheduled redetermination every six months with one interim, additional redetermination allowed during any six month period between scheduled redeterminations at either the option of Cano's lenders or Cano.

        At Cano's option, interest is either (i) the sum of (a) the UBNA reference rate and (b) the applicable margin of (1) 0.875% if less than 50% of the borrowing base is borrowed, (2) 1.125% if at least 50% but less than 75% of the borrowing base is borrowed, (3) 1.375% if at least 75% but less than 90% of the borrowing base is borrowed or (4) 1.625% if at least 90% of the borrowing base is borrowed; or (ii) the sum of (a) the one, two, three, six, nine or twelve month LIBOR rate (at Cano's option) and (b) the applicable margin of (1) 2.0% if less than 50% of the borrowing base is borrowed, (2) 2.25% if at least 50% but less than 75% of the borrowing base is borrowed, (3) 2.50% if at least 75% but less than 90% of the borrowing base is borrowed or (4) 2.75% if at least 90% of the borrowing base is borrowed. Cano owes a commitment fee on the unborrowed portion of the borrowing base of 0.375% per annum if less than 90% of the borrowing base is borrowed and 0.50% per annum if at least 90% of the borrowing base is borrowed.

        Unless specific events of default occur, the maturity date of the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement is December 17, 2012. Specific events of default which could cause all outstanding principal and accrued interest to be accelerated, include, but are not limited to, payment defaults, material breaches of representations and warranties, breaches of covenants, certain cross-defaults, insolvency, a change in control or a material adverse change.

        The Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement contains certain negative covenants including, subject to certain exceptions, covenants against the following: (i) incurring additional liens, (ii) incurring additional debt or issuing additional equity interests other than common equity interests; (iii) merging or consolidating or selling, leasing, transferring, assigning, farming-out, conveying or otherwise disposing of any property, (iv) making certain payments, including cash dividends to Cano's common stockholders, (v) making any loans, advances or capital contributions to, or making any investment in, or purchasing or committing to purchase any stock or other securities or evidences of indebtedness or interest in any person or oil and gas properties or activities related to oil and gas properties unless (a) with regard to new oil and gas properties, such properties are mortgaged to UBNA, as

III-76


Table of Contents


administrative agent, or (b) with regard to new subsidiaries, such subsidiaries execute a guaranty, pledge agreement, security agreement or mortgage in favor of UBNA, as administrative agent, and (vi) entering into affiliate transactions on terms that are not at least as favorable to Cano as comparable arm's length transactions.

        On December 30, 2009, Cano entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement, which specifies (i) Cano's borrowing base was redetermined to be $60.0 million, which will remain in effect until it is redetermined in accordance with the agreement, (ii) advances under the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement for any purpose other than to acquire proved, developed, producing oil and gas properties shall not exceed $52.0 million and (iii) the covenants relating to Cano's leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio were waived for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2009. In connection with such amendment, Cano paid an amendment fee of $90,000. On March 30, 2010, Cano entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement, which specifies the covenants relating to its leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio were waived for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2010. The amendment also specifies that if the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement has not been replaced, refinanced, or amended and restated on or before May 31, 2010, then Cano must pay an amendment fee amount of $90,000 on May 31, 2010. A portion of the net proceeds from the offering and borrowings under the New Facility will be used to repay, in full, the balance outstanding under this facility. Upon repayment of this facility, it will be terminated. The ability to make the afore-mentioned payment(s) under this facility and the ability to reduce overall indebtedness for the combined company is dependent upon the amount of proceeds from the offering.

        The Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement contains three principal financial covenants with reconciliations to corresponding GAAP amounts (if necessary):

III-77


Table of Contents

        At March 31, 2010, Cano's ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 1.84 to 1.00. The calculation and reconciliation of current assets and current liabilities, as defined by GAAP, to current assets and current liabilities, as defined in the credit agreements is as follows (in thousands):

 
  March 31, 2010  

Current assets (GAAP)

  $ 8,107  

Unused borrowing base at March 31, 2010

    10,000 (1)

Less: derivative assets

    (3,486 )
       

Modified current assets (non-GAAP)

  $ 14,621 (A)
       

Current liabilities (GAAP)

 
$

73,390
 

Less: current portion of long-term debt

    (65,000 )

Less: derivative liabilities

    (227 )

Less: asset retirement obligation

    (236 )
       

Modified current liabilities (non-GAAP)

  $ 7,927 (B)
       

Modified current ratio (A) / (B)

    1.84 to 1.00  

(1)
Represents the $60.0 million borrowing base under the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement at March 31, 2010, less $50.0 million of debt outstanding under the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement at March 31, 2010.

        The Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement also contains customary events of default that would permit Cano's lenders to accelerate the debt under the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement if not cured within applicable grace periods, including, among others, failure to make payments of principal or interest when due, materially incorrect representations and warranties, breach of covenants, failure to make mandatory prepayments in the event of borrowing base deficiencies, events of bankruptcy, dissolution, the occurrence of one or more unstayed judgments in excess of $1,000,000 and defaults upon other obligations, including obligations under the Subordinated Credit Agreement.

        On September 30, 2008, Cano paid off the entire outstanding $15.0 million principal due under the then existing subordinated credit agreement, interest expense and a prepayment premium of $0.3 million. In conjunction with the payoff, Cano terminated that subordinated credit agreement.

        On December 17, 2008, Cano finalized the $25.0 million Subordinated Credit Agreement among Cano, the lenders and UBE, as Administrative Agent. On March 17, 2009, Cano borrowed the maximum available amount of $15.0 million under this agreement and paid down outstanding senior

III-78


Table of Contents


debt under the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement. An additional $10.0 million could be made available at the lender's sole discretion.

        The interest rate is the sum of (a) the one, two, three, six, nine or twelve month LIBOR rate (at our option) and (b) 6.0%. Through March 17, 2009, we owed a commitment fee of 1.0% on the unborrowed portion of the available borrowing amount. As of March 17, 2009, Cano no longer has a commitment fee since it borrowed the full $15.0 million available amount.

        Unless specific events of default occur, the maturity date is June 17, 2013. Specific events of default which could cause all outstanding principal and accrued interest to be accelerated, include, but are not limited to, payment defaults, material breaches of representations and warranties, breaches of covenants, certain cross-defaults, insolvency, a change in control or a material adverse change as defined in the Subordinated Credit Agreement.

        The Subordinated Credit Agreement contains certain negative covenants including, subject to certain exceptions, covenants against the following: (i) incurring additional liens, (ii) incurring additional debt or issuing additional equity interests other than common equity interests of Cano; (iii) merging or consolidating or selling, leasing, transferring, assigning, farming-out, conveying or otherwise disposing of any property, (iv) making certain payments, including cash dividends to our common stockholders, (v) making any loans, advances or capital contributions to, or making any investment in, or purchasing or committing to purchase any stock or other securities or evidences of indebtedness or interest in any person or oil and gas properties or activities related to oil and gas properties unless (a) with regard to new oil and gas properties, such properties are mortgaged to UBE, as administrative agent, or (b) with regard to new subsidiaries, such subsidiaries execute a guaranty, pledge agreement, security agreement or mortgage in favor of UBE, as administrative agent, and (vi) entering into affiliate transactions on terms that are not at least as favorable to Cano as comparable arm's length transactions.

        On December 30, 2009, Cano entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Subordinated Credit Agreement, which specifies the covenants relating to its leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio were waived for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2009. In connection with such amendment, Cano paid an amendment fee of $22,500. On March 30, 2010, Cano entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Subordinated Credit Agreement, which specifies the covenants relating to its leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio were waived for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2010. The amendment also specifies that if the Subordinated Credit Agreement has not been terminated on or before May 31, 2010, then Cano must pay an amendment fee amount of $22,500 on May 31, 2010. A portion of the net proceeds from the offering and borrowings under the New Facility will be used to repay, in full, the balance outstanding under this facility. Upon repayment of this facility, it will be terminated. The ability to make the afore-mentioned repayment of this facility and the ability to reduce overall indebtedness for the combined company is dependent upon the amount of proceeds from the offering.

        The Subordinated Credit Agreement contains four principal financial covenants:

III-79


Table of Contents

 
  March 31, 2010  

Current assets (GAAP)

  $ 8,107  

Unused borrowing base at March 31, 2010

    10,000 (1)

Less: derivative assets

    (3,486 )
       

Modified current assets (non-GAAP)

  $ 14,621 (A)
       

Current liabilities (GAAP)

 
$

73,390
 

Less: current portion of long-term debt

    (65,000 )

Less: derivative liabilities

    (227 )

Less: asset retirement obligation

    (236 )
       

Modified current liabilities (non-GAAP)

  $ 7,927 (B)
       

Modified current ratio (A) / (B)

    1.84 to 1.00  

(1)
Represents the $60.0 million borrowing base under the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement at March 31, 2010, less $50.0 million of debt outstanding under the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement at March 31, 2010.

 
  Quarter Ended
December 31, 2009
 

Total present value (non-GAAP)

  $ 211,490   (G)
       

 

 
  December 31, 2009  

Long-term debt (GAAP)

  $ 66,700   (H)
       

Total present value to debt (G)/(H)

    3.17 to 1:00  

        The Subordinated Credit Agreement also contains customary events of default that would permit Cano's lenders to accelerate the debt under the Subordinated Credit Agreement if not cured within

III-80


Table of Contents


applicable grace periods, including, among others, failure to make payments of principal or interest when due, materially incorrect representations and warranties, breach of covenants, failure to make mandatory prepayments in the event of borrowing base deficiencies, events of bankruptcy, dissolution, the occurrence of one or more unstayed judgments in excess of $1,000,000 and defaults upon other obligations, including obligations under the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement.

Results of Operations

Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to the Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2009

        For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano had a loss applicable to common stock of $0.2 million, which was an improvement of $1.0 million as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009 of a $1.2 million loss applicable to common stock. The $1.0 million earnings improvement primarily related to higher operating revenues of $2.2 million and increased income from discontinued operations of $1.6 million, partially offset by reduced gain on derivatives of $2.7 million.

        For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano had a loss applicable to common stock of $13.1 million, which was a $37.4 million decrease as compared to the $24.3 million income applicable to common stock incurred for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. Items contributing to the $37.4 million earnings decrease were reduced gain on derivatives of $52.9 million, lower income from discontinued operations of $10.0 million, decreased income from the preferred stock repurchased for less than the carrying amount of $10.9 million and lower operating revenues of $1.7 million. Partially offsetting the earnings decrease were lower operating expenses of $27.0 million, which is primarily attributable to a $22.4 million charge for impairment of long-lived assets during the nine months ended March 31, 2009.

        These items will be addressed in the following discussion.

Operating Revenues

        The table below summarizes Cano's operating revenues for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.

 
  Three months ended
March 31,
   
  Nine months ended
March 31,
   
 
 
  Increase
(Decrease)
  Increase
(Decrease)
 
 
  2010   2009   2010   2009  

Operating Revenues (in thousands)

  $ 5,803   $ 3,606   $ 2,197   $ 16,368   $ 18,119   $ (1,751 )

Sales Volumes

                                     
 

Crude Oil (MBbls)

    68     78     (10 )   208     220     (12 )
 

Natural Gas (MMcf)

    90     124     (34 )   324     398     (74 )
 

Total (MBOE)

    83     99     (16 )   262     286     (24 )

Average Realized Price

                                     
 

Crude Oil ($/ Bbl)

  $ 72.62   $ 35.40   $ 37.22   $ 67.56   $ 65.97   $ 1.59  
 

Natural Gas ($/ Mcf)

  $ 9.70   $ 5.41   $ 4.29   $ 7.17   $ 8.26   $ (1.09 )

Operating Revenues and Commodity Derivative Settlements (in thousands)

  $ 6,556   $ 6,452   $ 104   $ 20,167   $ 22,126   $ (1,959 )

Average Adjusted Price (includes commodity derivative settlements)

                                     
 

Crude Oil ($/ Bbl)

  $ 75.32   $ 62.32   $ 13.00   $ 73.48   $ 79.71   $ (6.23 )
 

Natural Gas ($/Mcf)

  $ 15.99   $ 11.26   $ 4.73   $ 15.09   $ 10.74   $ 4.35  

III-81


Table of Contents

        The three months ended March 31, 2010 operating revenues of $5.8 million are $2.2 million higher as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009 of $3.6 million. The $2.2 million increase is primarily attributable to higher average prices received for crude oil and natural gas sales of $2.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively, partially offset by lower crude oil and natural gas sales volumes which combined to reduce revenues by $0.6 million.

        The nine months ended March 31, 2010 operating revenues of $16.4 million are $1.7 million lower as compared to the nine months ended March 31, 2009 of $18.1 million. The $1.7 million decrease is primarily attributable to lower crude oil and natural gas sales volumes which reduced revenues by $0.8 million and $0.6 million, respectively, and lower average prices received for natural gas sales of $0.4 million and lower other revenue of $0.3 million. Partially offsetting these revenue decreases were higher prices received for crude oil sales of $0.3 million.

        The average prices Cano received for its crude oil and natural gas sales are supplemented by commodity derivative settlements received for the three- and nine month-periods ending March 31, 2010 and 2009, as presented in the preceding table. If crude oil and natural gas NYMEX prices are lower than derivative floor prices, Cano will be reimbursed by its counterparty for the difference between the NYMEX price and floor price (i.e. realized gain). Conversely, if crude oil and natural gas NYMEX prices are higher than the derivative ceiling prices, Cano will pay its counterparty for the difference between the NYMEX price and ceiling price (i.e. realized loss).

        Crude Oil Sales Volumes.    For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's crude oil sales were 10 MBbls lower as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009. This resulted from lower sales from the Cato Properties of 6 MBbls and from the Panhandle Properties of 4 MBbls due to severe weather during January and February 2010 which temporarily curtailed production. The sales decrease at the Cato Properties resulted from the reduction of injected water and redistribution of water injection at the waterflood which resulted in lower production, as discussed under "—Drilling Capital Development and Operating Activities Update."

        For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's crude oil sales were 12 MBbls lower as compared to the nine months ended March 31, 2009 due to the reasons previously discussed and lower sales from the Panhandle Properties due to temporary shut-in production at the Cockrell Ranch waterflood resulting from the controlled injection project surveillance, as previously discussed under the "—Drilling Capital Development and Operating Activities Update."All Cockrell Ranch production that had been shut-in for the controlled injection project was restored on September 28, 2009.

        Natural Gas Sales Volumes.    For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's natural gas sales were 34 MMcf lower as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009 primarily due to reduced sales at the Cato Properties of 21 MMcf, the Panhandle Properties of 8 MMcf and the Desdemona Properties of 7 MMcf. The sales reduction at the Cato Properties occurred as the natural gas purchaser temporarily declined to take the natural gas production for most of the three months ended March 31, 2010. Gas sales resumed at the Cato Properties in mid-March 2010. The lower natural gas sales at the Panhandle Properties resulted from the severe weather, as previously discussed. Lower sales at the Desdemona Properties resulted as the gas plant was temporarily shut-in to equip the plant to handle increased natural gas production from the return to production of 25 shut-in gas wells as previously discussed under the "—Drilling Capital Development and Operating Activities Update."

        For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's natural gas sales were 74 MMcf lower as compared to the nine months ended March 31, 2009 primarily due to lower sales at the Desdemona Properties of 30 MMcf, Panhandle Properties of 24 MMcf and Cato Properties of 17 MMcf. Lower natural gas sales at the Desdemona Properties resulted from the shut-in natural gas production from Cano's Barnett Shale wells during July 2009, based upon the current and near-term outlook of natural gas prices and the reactivation of its gas plant, as previously discussed. Lower natural gas sales at the Panhandle Properties resulted from severe weather and from the controlled production project at

III-82


Table of Contents


Cockrell Ranch waterflood, as previously discussed, and one of Cano's gas purchasers experienced an unplanned plant outage from mid-August 2009 through the end of September 2009, which resulted in reduced natural gas and NGL sales. Lower natural gas sales at the Cato Properties resulted from the purchaser temporarily declining to take natural gas production, as previously discussed.

        Crude Oil and Natural Gas Prices.    The average price Cano receives for crude oil sales is generally at market prices received at the wellhead, except for the Cato Properties, for which it receives below market prices due to the level of impurities in the oil. The average price Cano receives for natural gas sales is approximately the market price received at the wellhead, adjusted for the value of natural gas liquids, less transportation and marketing expenses. As previously discussed, Cano has commodity derivatives in place that mitigate future price risk.

        Cano expects to grow sales through its development plans as previously discussed under "—Development Capital Expenditures and Operating Activities Update."

Operating Expenses

        For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's total operating expenses were $8.2 million, which approximated the three months ended March 31, 2009 of $8.1 million. Lower lease operating expenses of $0.4 million and lower depletion and depreciation expense of $0.4 million were offset by increased general and administrative of $0.8 million and increased production taxes of $0.1 million.

        For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's total operating expenses were $31.6 million, which is a decrease of $27.0 million as compared to the nine months ended March 31, 2009 of $58.7 million. The nine months ended March 31, 2009 included an impairment of long-lived assets of $22.4 million, which is the primary reason for the overall decrease. In addition, Cano had reduced general and administrative of $7.2 million, lower lease operating expenses of $1.9 million and lower depletion and depreciation expense of $0.5 million, partially offset by the exploration expense of $5.0 million recorded during the nine months ended March 31, 2010.

        Cano's lease operating expenses ("LOE") consist of the costs of producing crude oil and natural gas such as labor, supplies, repairs, maintenance, workovers and utilities.

        For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's LOE was $3.6 million, which is $0.4 million lower than the three months ended March 31, 2009 of $4.0 million. The LOE decrease for the three months ended March 31, 2010 of $0.4 million resulted primarily from reduced service rates negotiated with the vendors of $0.3 million, lower electricity expense of $0.1 million and the shut-in of Cano's Barnett Shale natural gas wells, as previously discussed under "Operating Revenues," which reduced LOE by $0.1 million. Partially offsetting these LOE cost reductions were increased LOE at the Cato Properties of $0.1 million to support increased focus on production activities.

        For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's LOE was $11.8 million, which is $1.9 million lower than the nine months ended March 31, 2009 of $13.7 million. The LOE decreases for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 of $1.9 million resulted primarily from reduced service rates negotiated with vendors of $1.2 million, lower electricity expense of $0.8 million and the shut-in of Cano's Barnett Shale natural gas wells which reduced LOE by $0.5 million. Partially offsetting these LOE cost reductions were increased LOE at the Cato Properties $0.6 million to support increased focus on production activities.

        For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's LOE per barrels of oil equivalent ("BOE"), based on production, was $36.88, which is an improvement of $1.22 as compared to $38.10 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's LOE per BOE, based on production, was $39.80, which is an improvement of $5.27 as compared to $45.07 for

III-83


Table of Contents


the nine months ended March 31, 2009. In general, secondary and tertiary LOE is higher than LOE for companies developing primary production because Cano's fields are more mature and typically produce less oil and more water. Cano expects LOE to decrease during the 2010 fiscal year as it realize the continued benefit of lower service rates negotiated with vendors, and expects LOE per BOE to decrease as production increases from the waterflood and EOR development activities it has implemented and are implementing as discussed under the "—Drilling Capital Development and Operating Activities Update."

        For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's production and ad valorem taxes were $0.5 million, which is $0.2 million higher than the three months ended March 31, 2009 of $0.3 million. The $0.2 million increase resulted from higher production taxes from increased operating revenue. Cano's production taxes as a percent of operating revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were 6.4% as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009 of 5.5%.

        For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's production and ad valorem taxes were $1.4 million, which is $0.3 million lower than the nine months ended March 31, 2009 of $1.7 million. The $0.3 million decrease resulted from lower production taxes of $0.1 million due to lower operating revenues and reduced ad valorem taxes of $0.2 million due to lower property tax valuations by taxing authorities for the 2009 calendar year. Cano's production taxes as a percent of operating revenues for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 of 6.4% was comparable to the nine months ended March 31, 2009 of 6.5%.

        Cano's general and administrative ("G&A") expenses consist of support services for its operating activities and investor relations costs.

        For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's G&A expenses totaled $2.9 million, which is $0.7 million higher than the three months ended March 31, 2009 of $2.2 million. The $0.7 million increase resulted from higher legal costs of $1.1 million partially offset by lower stock-based compensation costs of $0.4 million. The $1.1 million increase in legal expenses is due to the three months ended March 31, 2010 including $0.3 million of costs pertaining to litigation and merger-related activities and the three months ended March 31, 2009 included a settlement received from the former owners of the Panhandle Properties pertaining to the fire litigation. The lower stock-based compensation costs are directly related to reduced issuances of stock options and restricted stock.

        For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's G&A expenses totaled $9.4 million, which is $7.2 million lower than the nine months ended March 31, 2009 of $16.6 million. The $7.2 million expense reduction resulted primarily from reduced litigation costs of $6.4 million, reduced stock-based compensation costs of $1.4 million, and lower payroll and benefits costs of $0.6 million. Partially offsetting these expense reductions were increased costs related to the merger of $1.7 million. The reduced payroll and benefits costs resulted from workforce reductions that Cano implemented during the quarter ended March 31, 2009, which eliminated 25% of its home office staff. The lower stock-based compensation was previously discussed. The litigation cost reduction occurred as Cano settled all but one of its fire litigation claims during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. Cano expects continued decreases in future quarters' legal expenses after Cano close the proposed merger with Resaca.

        During the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano recorded exploration expense of $5.0 million pertaining to the Nowata Alkaline-Surfactant-Polymer ("ASP") Project. During December 2009, Cano finalized its performance analysis, which indicated the Nowata ASP Project did not result in increased

III-84


Table of Contents

oil production of significant quantities to be considered economically viable that would justify the recognition of proved reserves. Accordingly, at December 31, 2009, Cano recorded a $5.0 million pre-tax exploration expense.

        During the quarter ended December 31, 2009, Cano wrote down $0.3 million of costs associated with the ASP facility used for the Nowata ASP Project. The facility's water filtering process did not work properly with the oil-water fluid production at the Nowata Properties. Cano intends to use the ASP facility for future pilot tertiary projects at its Cato and Panhandle Properties.

        During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, Cano recorded a $22.4 million pre-tax impairment to its Barnett Shale Properties and a $0.7 million pre-tax impairment to the goodwill associated with its subsidiary which holds the equity in its Barnett Shale Properties. Cano recorded the impairments due to the decline in commodity prices which created an uncertainty in the likelihood of developing reserves associated with its Barnett Shale Properties within the next five years.

        For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's depletion and depreciation expense was $1.1 million, which is $0.5 million lower as compared to $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's depletion and depreciation expense was $3.6 million, which is $0.5 million lower as compared to $4.1 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. This includes depletion expense pertaining to Cano's oil and natural gas properties, and depreciation expense pertaining to its field operations vehicles and equipment, natural gas plant, office furniture and computers. The decrease is primarily due to lower crude oil and natural gas sales volumes (net) as previously discussed under "—Operating Revenues." For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano's depletion rate pertaining to its oil and gas properties was $10.60 per BOE and $11.20 per BOE, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and nine months ended March 31, 2009, Cano's depletion rate pertaining to its oil and gas properties was $13.34 per BOE and $12.57 per BOE, respectively.

        For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, Cano incurred interest expense of $0.5 million and $0.1 million, respectively. For the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, Cano incurred interest expense of $0.9 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Cano's interest expense is a direct result of the credit agreements it entered into. The interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was reduced by $0.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for interest cost that was capitalized to the waterflood projects discussed under "—Development Capital Expenditures and Operating Activities Update." The interest expense for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was reduced by $1.5 million and $0.9 million, respectively, for the same reason. Cano incurred higher interest costs during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 due to higher outstanding debt balances. The interest rates under Cano's credit agreements for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 were comparable to the interest rates it incurred for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009.

        Cano has entered into financial derivatives contracts for its commodity sales and interest expense. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano recorded a gain on derivatives of $0.8 million as compared to a gain of $3.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The three months

III-85


Table of Contents

ended March 31, 2010 gain of $0.8 million consisted of an unrealized gain of $0.1 million and a realized gain on settlements of derivative contracts of $0.7 million.

        For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano recorded a loss on derivatives of $4.5 million as compared to a gain of $48.5 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. The nine months ended March 31, 2010 loss on derivatives of $4.5 million consisted of an unrealized loss of $8.1 million and a realized gain on settlements of derivative contracts of $3.6 million.

        The realized gain primarily pertains to the realization of commodity settlements, as crude oil and natural gas NYMEX prices were lower than the floor prices.

        The unrealized gain and loss for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010, respectively, reflects the fair value of the commodity derivatives as of March 31, 2010 as compared to December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively. By their nature, these commodity derivatives can have a highly volatile impact on Cano's earnings. A ten percent change in the prices for Cano's commodity derivative instruments could impact its pre-tax earnings by approximately $35,000.

        For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Cano had income tax benefit of $0.6 million, as compared to an income tax benefit for the three months ended March 31, 2009 of $0.4 million. For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano had an income tax benefit of $6.8 million, as compared to income tax expense for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 of $3.3 million. The effective income tax rates for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and nine months ended March 31, 2010 were 28.2% and 33.0%, respectively. The effective income tax rates for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 were 30.4% and 48.2%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 was higher due to an increase in the state tax rate.

        For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano had income from discontinued operations of $1.7 million and $2.1 million, respectively. For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009, Cano had income from discontinued operations of $0.1 million and $12.1 million, respectively. This resulted from Cano's divestitures of the Certain Panhandle Properties, Pantwist, LLC and Corsicana Properties.

        The preferred stock dividend for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $0.5 million for each quarter. The preferred stock dividend for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 of $1.4 million was a decrease of $0.9 million from $2.3 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. The decrease of $0.9 million is attributable to the November and December 2008 repurchases of preferred stock. Due to the repurchases, Cano's quarterly preferred stock dividends will be approximately $0.5 million per quarter of which 59% will be PIK, with the balance paid in cash.

Years Ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007

        For the 2009 fiscal year, Cano had income applicable to Cano common stock of $7.9 million, which was a $29.5 million improvement as compared to the $21.6 million loss applicable to Cano common stock for the 2008 fiscal year. Items that led to the improvement were increased gain on derivatives of $75.7 million, preferred stock repurchased for less than the carrying amount of $10.9 million, higher income from discontinued operations of $8.0 million and lower Cano preferred stock dividend of

III-86


Table of Contents

$1.4 million. These positive factors were partially offset by higher operating expenses of $49.7 million, lower operating revenues of $9.2 million, lower deferred income tax benefit of $7.1 million and goodwill impairment of $0.7 million.

        For the 2008 fiscal year, Cano had a loss applicable to Cano common stock of $21.6 million, which was $17.6 million greater than the $4.0 million loss applicable to Cano common stock incurred for the year ended June 30, 2007, which we refer to as the 2007 fiscal year. Increased revenues of $14.0 million, increased deferred tax benefit of $8.8 million and lower interest expense of $0.9 million were more than offset by higher loss on commodity derivatives of $31.1 million, higher operating expenses of $8.3 million, lower income from discontinued operations of $1.0 million and increased Cano preferred stock dividend of $0.9 million.

Operating Revenues

        The table below summarizes Cano's operating revenues for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007.

 
   
   
   
  Increase (Decrease)  
 
  Year Ended June 30,  
 
  2009 v. 2008   2008 v. 2007  
 
  2009   2008   2007  

Operating Revenues (In Thousands)

  $ 25,409   $ 34,650   $ 20,651   $ (9,241 ) $ 13,999  

Sales:

                               
 

Crude Oil (MBbls)

    309     249     223     60     26  
 

Natural Gas (MMcf)

    776     908     824     (132 )   84  
 

MBOE

    438     401     360     37     41  

Average Realized Price

                               
 

Crude Oil ($/Bbl)

  $ 62.17   $ 94.08   $ 61.96   $ (31.91 ) $ 32.12  
 

Natural Gas ($/Mcf)

  $ 7.57   $ 11.99   $ 8.29   $ (4.42 ) $ 3.70  

Operating Revenues and Commodity

                               
 

Derivative Settlements (In Thousands)

  $ 32,299   $ 32,065   $ 21,614   $ 234   $ 10,451  

Average Adjusted Price (includes Commodity derivative settlements)

                               
 

Crude Oil ($/Bbl)

  $ 75.84   $ 81.92   $ 62.17   $ (6.08 ) $ 19.75  
 

Natural Gas ($/Mcf)

  $ 10.23   $ 12.48   $ 9.41   $ (2.25 ) $ 3.07  

        Cano's 2009 fiscal year operating revenues of $25.4 million were $9.2 million lower as compared to its 2008 fiscal year operating revenues of $34.7 million. The $9.2 million reduction is primarily attributable to lower prices received for crude oil and natural gas sales, which lowered revenues by $8.0 million and $4.0 million, respectively, and by lower natural gas sales volumes, which lowered revenues by $1.0 million. These decreases were partially offset by increased crude oil sales volumes, which increased revenues by $3.7 million.

        The impact of lower prices for crude oil and natural gas sales, as discussed above, is partially mitigated by commodity derivative settlements received during Cano's 2009 fiscal year as presented in the preceding table. As discussed in Note 7 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements, if crude oil and natural gas NYMEX prices are lower than derivative floor prices, Cano will be reimbursed by its counterparty for the difference between the NYMEX price and floor price (i.e. realized gain). Conversely, if crude oil and natural gas NYMEX prices are higher than the derivative ceiling prices, Cano will pay its counterparty for the difference between the NYMEX price and ceiling price (i.e. realized loss).

        Crude Oil Sales.    For Cano's 2009 fiscal year, approximately 82% of the increased crude oil sales of 60 MBbls were attributed to development activity at the Cato Properties, as previously discussed

III-87


Table of Contents


under the "—Drilling Capital Development and Operating Activities Update." Also, Cano increased crude oil sales from its Panhandle Properties due to development activity previously discussed under "—Drilling Capital Development and Operating Activities Update."

        Natural Gas Sales.    For Cano's 2009 fiscal year, the overall decrease in natural gas sales of 132 MMcf pertains primarily to reductions with respect to its Barnett Shale project at its Desdemona Properties. During the first half of calendar year 2008, various workovers and re-fracture stimulations were attempted to increase production. Through December 2008, these efforts were met with marginal success. In January 2009, Cano halted its workover program in the Desdemona Properties—Barnett Shale. Once the workover activity ceased, Cano experienced normal Barnett Shale annual production declines of approximately 65-90%. In July 2009, Cano shut-in its Barnett Shale natural gas wells and, based upon the current and near-term outlook of natural gas prices, Cano has no plans to return these wells to production in the foreseeable future.

        Also, higher gas production from the Cato Properties due to the aforementioned development activity was offset by lower gas production from Cano's Panhandle Properties due to normal field decline of approximately 10% annually and temporary pipeline curtailments of gas deliveries by its gas purchasers.

        Crude Oil and Natural Gas Prices.    The average price Cano receives for crude oil sales is generally at market prices received at the wellhead, except for the Cato Properties, for which Cano receives below market prices due to the levels of impurities in the oil. Differentials gapped briefly as commodity prices rapidly declined between July 2008 and December 2008; however, the differentials have since recovered with the higher crude oil prices. The average price Cano receives for natural gas sales is approximately the market price received at the wellhead, adjusted for the value of natural gas liquids, less transportation and marketing expenses. As discussed in Note 7 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements, Cano has commodity derivatives in place that provide for $80 to $85 crude oil "floor prices" and $7.75 to $8.00 natural gas "floor prices." If crude oil and natural gas NYMEX prices are lower than the "floor prices," Cano will be reimbursed by its counterparty for the difference between the NYMEX price and "floor price."

        Cano's 2008 fiscal year operating revenues of $34.7 million represent an improvement of $14.0 million as compared to Cano's 2007 fiscal year operating revenues of $20.7 million. The $14.0 million improvement is primarily attributable to:

Operating Expenses

        For Cano's 2009 fiscal year, its total operating expenses were $84.4 million, or $49.7 million higher than its 2008 fiscal year of $34.7 million. The primary contributors to the increase were an impairment of long-lived assets of $26.7 million and exploration expense of $11.4 million associated with the Desdemona Properties—Duke Sands waterflood project. In addition, Cano experienced increased lease operating expenses of $5.6 million, general and administrative of $4.3 million and higher depletion and depreciation of $1.8 million.

III-88


Table of Contents

        For Cano's 2008 fiscal year, its total operating expenses were $34.7 million, or $8.3 million higher than its 2007 fiscal year of $26.4 million. The $8.3 million increase is primarily attributed to increased lease operating expenses of $4.6 million, higher general and administrative expenses of $2.2 million, higher production and ad valorem taxes of $0.8 million and increased depletion and depreciation expense of $0.7 million.

Lease Operating Expenses

        Cano's lease operating expenses, which we refer to as LOE, consist of the costs of producing crude oil and natural gas such as labor, supplies, repairs, maintenance, workovers and utilities.

        For the 2009 fiscal year, Cano's LOE was $18.8 million, which is $5.5 million higher than 2008 fiscal year of $13.3 million. The $5.5 million increase resulted primarily from increased workover activities and general repairs at the Panhandle Properties of $4.2 million and higher operating expenses incurred at the Cato Properties of $2.1 million to support increased crude oil and natural gas sales, as discussed under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Cano—Results of Operations—Operating Revenues," partially offset by lower operating expenses of $1.1 million due to lower natural gas sales at the Desdemona Properties, as discussed under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Cano—Results of Operations—Operating Revenues." Cano also had higher LOE at the Davenport and Nowata Properties of $0.3 million due to increased electricity expenses, general repairs and workover expenses. The workover activities at the Panhandle Properties pertained to returning wells to production and have increased production, as discussed under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Cano—Results of Operations—Operating Revenues," and are expected to result in increased production in future months.

        For the 2009 fiscal year, Cano's LOE per BOE, based on production, was $41.28 as compared to $32.69 for the 2008 fiscal year. In general, secondary and tertiary LOE is higher than the LOE for companies developing primary production because Cano's fields are more mature and typically produce less oil and more water. Cano expects the LOE to decrease during the 2010 fiscal year as Cano realizes the benefit of a full year of lower service rates with vendors, and Cano expects LOE per BOE to decrease as production increases from the waterflood and EOR development activities Cano has implemented and are implementing as discussed under "—Drilling Capital Development and Operating Activities Update." Cano did experience decreases in its LOE per BOE during the 2009 fiscal year as the LOE per BOE for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $37.75, which is lower than the $44.84 LOE per BOE for the six months ended December 31, 2008.

        For the 2008 fiscal year, Cano's LOE was $13.3 million, which is $4.6 million higher as compared to the 2007 fiscal year LOE of $8.7 million. Cano incurred higher LOE due to the inclusion of the Cato Properties of $0.8 million, increased lifting costs at the Desdemona Properties of $1.7 million, increased workover rig expenses at the Panhandle and Pantwist Properties of $1.6 million and increased electricity expense of $0.7 million. Other factors contributing to higher LOE were increased crude oil and natural gas sales, as discussed under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Cano—Results of Operations—Operating Revenues," and generally higher costs for goods and services. Cano's LOE for the 2008 fiscal year included a full year of Cato Properties' operating results versus three months in the 2007 fiscal year. Cano's LOE per BOE has increased from $23.47 during the 2007 fiscal year to $32.69 for the 2008 fiscal year, for the reasons previously discussed.

III-89


Table of Contents

Production and Ad Valorem Taxes

        For the 2009 fiscal year, Cano's production and ad valorem taxes were $2.4 million, which is $0.1 million lower than the 2008 fiscal year of $2.5 million. Cano's production taxes were lower by $0.6 million due to lower operating revenues and were partially offset by increased ad valorem taxes of $0.5 million. The increased ad valorem taxes were due to notification of revisions in tax property valuations by taxing authorities for the 2008 calendar year. Therefore, the 2009 fiscal year includes higher tax rates for the twelve months plus a charge for applying the rates to the first six months of the 2008 calendar year. Cano's production taxes as a percent of operating revenues for the 2009 fiscal year of 6.5% was comparable to the 2008 fiscal years of 6.7%. Cano anticipates the 2010 fiscal year to be subject to similar production tax rates.

        For the 2008 fiscal year, Cano's production and ad valorem taxes were $2.5 million, which is $0.8 million higher than the 2007 fiscal year of $1.7 million. The $0.8 million increase is attributable to higher operating revenues, as previously discussed.

General and Administrative Expenses

        Cano's general and administrative, which Cano refers to as G&A, expenses consist of support services for its operating activities and investor relations costs.

        For the 2009 fiscal year, Cano's G&A expenses totaled $19.2 million, which is $4.3 million higher than fiscal year 2008 of $14.9 million. The primary contributors to the $4.3 million increase were higher litigation costs of $4.4 million pertaining to the settlement costs and legal fees pertaining of the fire litigation as discussed in Note 17 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements and increased stock compensation expense of $0.2 million partially offset by reduced payroll expense of $0.3 million. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, Cano took steps to reduce its payroll, eliminating 25% of its home office staff. The quarter ended June 30, 2009 was the first time Cano realized these savings.

        Since Cano has settled all fire litigation claims except for one lawsuit, as discussed in Note 17 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements, Cano expects significant decreases in future quarters' legal expenses. Also, the previously discussed workforce reductions are expected to reduce payroll and benefits costs by $0.8 million annually.

        For the 2008 fiscal year, Cano's G&A expenses totaled $14.9 million, which is $2.3 million higher than fiscal year 2007 of $12.6 million. The primary contributors to the $2.3 million increase were:

        These increases were partially offset by lower fees of $0.3 million for accounting services to achieve full compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and reductions totaling $0.1 million pertaining to other expenses.

III-90


Table of Contents

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

        During the 2009 fiscal year, Cano recorded a $26.7 million impairment on our Barnett Shale Properties. As discussed in Note 14 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements, the decline in commodity prices created an uncertainty in the likelihood of developing Cano's reserves associated with its Barnett Shale natural gas properties within the next five years. Therefore, during the quarter ended December 31, 2008, we recorded a $22.4 million pre-tax impairment to Cano's Barnett Shale Properties. During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, Cano recorded an additional $4.3 million pre-tax impairment to its Barnett Shale Properties as the forward outlook for natural gas prices continued to decline and Cano shut-in its Barnett Shale natural gas wells. The fair value was determined using estimates of future production volumes, prices and operating expenses, discounted to a present value.

Exploration Expense

        During the 2009 fiscal year, Cano recorded exploration expense of $11.4 million pertaining to the Duke Sands waterflood project. The primary source of water for this waterflood project had been derived from the Barnett Shale wells. Since Cano has shut-in its Barnett Shale natural gas production due to uneconomic natural gas commodity prices, as previously discussed, Cano no longer has an economic source of water to continue flooding the Duke Sands. Therefore, Cano's rate of water injection has been reduced to a point where Cano cannot consider the waterflood active. Cano continues to believe that this reservoir is an excellent secondary and tertiary recovery candidate; however, Cano does not have current plans to recommence injection for the foreseeable future.

Depletion and Depreciation

        For the 2009 fiscal year, Cano's depletion and depreciation expense was $5.7 million, an increase of $1.8 million as compared to the 2008 fiscal year depletion and depreciation expense of $3.9 million. This includes depletion expense pertaining to its oil and natural gas properties, and depreciation expense pertaining to its field operations vehicles and equipment, natural gas plant, office furniture and computers. The increase is due to increased crude oil and natural gas sales volumes (net) as previously discussed under "—Operating Revenues" and higher per BOE depletion rates. For the 2009 fiscal year, Cano's depletion rate pertaining to its oil and gas properties was $11.85 per BOE, as compared to the 2008 fiscal year rate of $8.90 per BOE. The increased depletion rates resulted from higher depletion rates for Cano's Cato and Panhandle Properties based on its reserve redetermination at June 30, 2009 and periodic reassessments of depletion rates during the 2009 fiscal year.

        For the 2008 fiscal year, Cano's depletion and depreciation expense was $3.9 million, an increase of $0.7 million as compared to the 2007 fiscal year depletion and depreciation expense of $3.2 million. This includes depletion expense pertaining to its oil and natural gas properties, and depreciation expense pertaining to its field operations vehicles and equipment, natural gas plant, office furniture and computers. The increase is due to increased crude oil and natural gas sales volumes as previously discussed under "—Operating Revenues" and higher per BOE depletion rates. For the 2008 fiscal year, Cano's depletion rate pertaining to its oil and gas properties was $8.19 per BOE, as compared to 2007 fiscal year rate of $6.91 per BOE. The higher depletion rates resulted from a reduction of reserves for the Desdemona—Barnett Shale and Pantwist Properties, as discussed in Note 18 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements, and higher depletion rates attributed to the Cato Properties.

Interest Expense and Other

        For the 2009, 2008 and 2007 fiscal years, Cano incurred interest expense of $0.5 million, $0.8 million and $1.7 million, respectively, as a direct result of the credit agreements Cano entered into, as discussed in Note 6 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements. The interest expense for the 2009, 2008 and 2007 fiscal years was reduced by $1.4 million, $2.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for

III-91


Table of Contents


interest cost that was capitalized to the waterflood and ASP projects discussed under the "—Drilling Capital Development and Operating Activities Update." Cano incurred higher interest costs during the 2008 fiscal year due to higher outstanding debt balances and higher interest rates.

Gain (Loss) on Commodity Derivatives

        As discussed in Note 7 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements, Cano has entered into financial contracts for its commodity derivatives and an interest rate swap arrangement. For the 2009 fiscal year, Cano recorded a gain on derivatives of $43.8 million as compared to losses of $32.0 million and $0.8 million for the 2008 and 2007 fiscal years, respectively. The 2009 fiscal year gain consisted of an unrealized gain of $36.9 million, a realized gain on settlements of commodity derivative contracts of $6.2 million and a $0.7 million realized gain on the sale of floor-priced contracts.

        The 2008 fiscal year loss consists of unrealized and realized losses of $29.4 million and $2.6 million, respectively. For the 2007 fiscal year, Cano incurred an unrealized loss of $1.8 million and a realized gain of $1.0 million.

        For the realization of settlements, if crude oil and natural gas NYMEX prices are lower than the floor prices, Cano will be reimbursed by its counterparty for the difference between the NYMEX price and floor price (i.e., realized gain). Conversely, if crude oil and natural gas NYMEX prices are higher than the ceiling prices, Cano will pay its counterparty for the difference between the NYMEX price and ceiling price (i.e., realized loss).

        The unrealized gain for the 2009 fiscal year reflects the fair value of the commodity derivatives as of June 30, 2009. By their nature, these commodity derivatives can have a highly volatile impact on Cano's earnings. A five percent change in the prices for Cano's commodity derivative instruments could impact its pre-tax earnings by approximately $1.8 million.

Income Tax Benefit (Expense)

        For the 2009 fiscal year, Cano had income tax expense of $1.7 million, as compared to an income tax benefit for the 2008 and 2007 fiscal years of $9.8 million and $0.4 million, respectively. These tax amounts included taxes related to discontinued operations as shown in Note 8 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements. The increased income taxes for the 2009 fiscal year, as compared to the 2008 and 2007 fiscal years, is due to the increase in taxable income and an increase in the state tax rate and other permanent items, as presented in Note 16 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements, resulting in an aggregate rate of 35.9%. The income tax rates for the 2008 and 2007 fiscal years was 35.3% for each year.

Income from Discontinued Operations

        For the 2009, 2008 and 2007 fiscal years, Cano had income from discontinued operations of $11.5 million, $3.5 million and $4.5 million, respectively, due to Cano's divestitures of the Pantwist, LLC; Corsicana Properties and Rich Valley Properties, as discussed in Note 8 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements.

Preferred Stock Dividend

        The preferred stock dividend for the 2009 fiscal year of $2.7 million was a decrease of $1.4 million from $4.1 million for 2008 fiscal year. This resulted from the November and December 2008 repurchases of preferred stock as discussed in Note 5 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements. Due to the repurchases, Cano's quarterly preferred stock dividends will be approximately $0.5 million per quarter of which 59% will be PIK, with the remaining balance paid in cash. Also, the 2008 fiscal year amount includes $0.5 million of federal tax Cano was required to withhold in accordance with

III-92


Table of Contents


Internal Revenue Service regulations from September 2006 through June 2008. These amounts did not have a material effect to Cano's prior period financial statements. Due to the previously discussed repurchases, Cano no longer has any Preferred Stock that required withholding taxes.

        The preferred stock dividend for the 2008 fiscal year of $4.1 million was $0.9 million higher than the $3.2 million for the 2007 fiscal year. This is primarily due to $0.5 million federal tax withholding previously discussed.

Contractual Obligations

        The following table sets forth Cano's contractual obligations at May 28, 2010 for the periods shown:

Amounts in thousands
  Total   Less than
1 Year
  1 To
3 Years
  3 to
5 Years
  More
Than
5 Years
 

Long-term debt(a)

  $ 65,900   $ 65,900   $   $   $  

Series D Preferred Stock

    28,125         28,125          
                       

Total contractual obligations

  $ 94,025   $ 65,900   $ 28,125   $   $  
                       

(a)
Cano's debt is classified as a current liability. The maturity dates of the Union Bank/Natixis Credit Agreement and Subordinated Credit Agreement are December 17, 2012 and June 17, 2013, respectively. See discussion under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Resaca—Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Combined Company—Contractual Obligations" on page III-51 regarding the combined company's plan for the contractual obligations set forth in the preceding table.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

        Cano's off balance sheet arrangements are limited to operating leases that have not and are not reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on its financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

        Cano derived the selected historical financial data in the table below from its unaudited interim consolidated financial statements. The sum of net income per share by quarter may not equal the net income per share for the year due to variations in the weighted average shares outstanding used in computing such amounts. The historical data presented here are only a summary and should be read in

III-93


Table of Contents


conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this annual report.

In thousands, except per share data
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010
  Sept. 30(a)   Dec. 31(a)   Mar. 31(a)    
 

Operating revenues from continuing operations

  $ 4,931   $ 5,634   $ 5,803        

Operating loss from continuing operations

    (4,726 )   (8,171 )   (2,383 )      

Loss from continuing operations

    (3,693 )   (8,646 )   (1,494 )      

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

    132     212     1,722        

Net income (loss) applicable to common stock

    (4,031 )   (8,854 )   (242 )      

Net income (loss) per share—basic

    (0.09 )   (0.19 )          

Net income (loss) per share—diluted

    (0.09 )   (0.19 )          

 

Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2009
  Sept. 30(b)   Dec. 31(c)   Mar. 31   Jun. 30(d)  

Operating revenues from continuing operations

  $ 10,932   $ 4,876   $ 3,928   $ 5,673  

Operating loss from continuing operations

    (1,335 )   (33,703 )   (4,332 )   (19,645 )

Loss from continuing operations

    13,607     (8,628 )   (704 )   (15,986 )

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

    (853 )   12,246     (5 )   92  

Net income (loss) applicable to common stock

    11,818     13,653     (1,179 )   (16,363 )

Net income (loss) per share—basic

    0.26     0.30     (0.03 )   (0.36 )

Net income (loss) per share—diluted

    0.23     0.27     (0.03 )   (0.36 )

 

Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2008
  Sept. 30   Dec. 31   Mar. 31   Jun. 30(e)  

Operating revenues from continuing operations

  $ 6,586   $ 7,696   $ 9,173   $ 11,195  

Operating income (loss) from continuing operations

    (1,008 )   (155 )   613     507  

Loss from continuing operations

    (931 )   (1,412 )   (1,995 )   (16,654 )

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

    652     722     946     1,151  

Net loss applicable to common stock

    (1,246 )   (1,578 )   (1,926 )   (16,854 )

Net loss per share—basic and diluted

    (0.04 )   (0.04 )   (0.05 )   (0.47 )

(a)
The discontinued operations for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 pertain to the sale of certain wells located in Cano's Panhandle Properties during January 2010. The discontinued operations for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 pertain to discontinued operations which occurred prior to June 30, 2009.

(b)
For the quarter ended September 30, 2008, Cano's results of operations were favorably impacted by $24.2 million unrealized gain on commodity derivatives resulting from a significant price decrease for both crude oil and natural gas.

(c)
For the quarter ended December 31, 2008, Cano's results of operations were unfavorably impacted by impairment of long-lived assets of $22.4 million, partially offset by unrealized gain on commodity derivatives.

(d)
For the quarter ended June 30, 2009, Cano's results of operations were unfavorably impacted by exploration expense of $11.4 million and impairment of long-lived assets of $4.3 million.

(e)
For the quarter ended June 30, 2008, Cano's results of operations were unfavorably impacted by $23.8 million unrealized loss on commodity derivatives resulting from a significant price increase for both crude oil and natural gas.

Critical Accounting Policies

        Cano has identified the critical accounting policies used in the preparation of its financial statements. These are the accounting policies that Cano has determined involve the most complex or subjective decisions or assessments.

III-94


Table of Contents

        Cano prepared its consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. GAAP requires management to make judgments and estimates, including choices between acceptable GAAP alternatives.

Oil and Gas Properties and Equipment

        Cano follows the successful efforts method of accounting. Exploration expenses, including geological and geophysical expenses and delay rentals, are charged to expense. The costs of drilling and equipping exploratory wells are deferred until the company has determined whether proved reserves have been found. If proved reserves are found, the deferred costs are capitalized as part of the wells and related equipment and facilities. If no proved reserves are found, the deferred costs are charged to expense. All development activity costs are capitalized. Cano is primarily engaged in the development and acquisition of crude oil and natural gas properties. Cano's activities are considered development where existing proved reserves are identified prior to commencement of the project and are considered exploration if there are no proved reserves at the beginning of such project. The property costs reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets resulted from acquisition and development activities and deferred exploratory drilling costs. Capitalized overhead costs that directly relate to Cano's drilling and development activities were $1.1 million and $0.8 million, for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Cano recorded capitalized interest costs of $1.4 million and $2.5 million for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Capitalized overhead costs that directly relate to Cano's drilling and development activities were $0.6 million and $0.9 million, for the nine-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Cano recorded capitalized interest costs of $1.5 million and $0.9 million for the nine-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

        Costs for repairs and maintenance to sustain or increase production from existing producing reservoirs are charged to expense. Significant tangible equipment added or replaced that extends the useful or productive life of the property is capitalized. Costs to construct facilities or increase the productive capacity from existing reservoirs are capitalized. Costs to construct facilities or increase the productive capacity from existing reservoirs are capitalized.

        Depreciation and depletion of producing properties are computed on the unit-of-production method based on estimated proved oil and natural gas reserves. Cano's unit-of-production amortization rates are revised prospectively on a quarterly basis based on updated engineering information for its proved developed reserves. Cano's development costs and lease and wellhead equipment are depleted based on proved developed reserves. Cano's leasehold costs are depleted based on total proved reserves. Investments in major development projects are not depleted until such project is substantially complete and producing or until impairment occurs. As of June 30, 2009 and 2008, capitalized costs related to waterflood and ASP projects that were in process and not subject to depletion amounted to $49.4 million and $47.6 million, respectively, of which $4.8 million and $13.1 million, respectively, were deferred costs related to drilling and equipping exploratory wells. As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, capitalized costs related to waterflood and ASP projects that were in process and not subject to depletion amounted to $50.4 million and $59.4 million, respectively, of which $0.0 million and $16.1 million, respectively, were deferred costs related to drilling and equipping exploratory wells.

        If conditions indicate that long-term assets may be impaired, the carrying value of Cano's properties is compared to management's future estimated pre-tax cash flow from the properties. If undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value, then the asset value is written down to fair value. Impairment of individually significant unproved properties is assessed on a property-by-property basis, and impairment of other unproved properties is assessed and amortized on an aggregate basis. The impairment assessment is affected by factors such as the results of exploration and development activities, commodity price projections, remaining lease terms, and potential shifts in Cano's business strategy.

III-95


Table of Contents

Asset Retirement Obligation

        Cano's financial statements reflect the fair value for any asset retirement obligation, consisting of future plugging and abandonment expenditures related to its oil and gas properties, which can be reasonably estimated. The asset retirement obligation is recorded as a liability at its estimated present value at the asset's inception, with an offsetting increase to producing properties on the consolidated balance sheets. Periodic accretion of the discount of the estimated liability is recorded as an expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

Estimates of Proved Reserves

        The term proved reserves is defined by the SEC in Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X adopted under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In general, proved reserves are the estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids that geological or engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions, i.e., prices and costs as of the date the estimate is made. Prices include consideration of changes in existing prices provided only by contractual arrangements, but not on escalations based on future conditions.

        Cano's estimates of proved reserves materially impact depletion expense. If proved reserves decline, then the rate at which Cano records depletion expense increases. A decline in estimates of proved reserves may result from lower prices, new information obtained from development drilling and production history; mechanical problems on Cano's wells; and catastrophic events such as explosions, hurricanes and floods. Lower prices also may make it uneconomical to drill wells or produce from fields with high operating costs. In addition, a decline in proved reserves may impact Cano's assessment of its oil and natural gas properties for impairment.

        Cano's proved reserve estimates are a function of many assumptions, all of which could deviate materially from actual results. As such, reserve estimates may vary materially from the ultimate quantities of crude oil and natural gas actually produced.

Revenue Recognition

        Cano's revenue recognition is based on the sales method of recording revenue. Cano does not have imbalances for natural gas sales. Cano recognizes revenue when crude oil and natural gas quantities are delivered to or collected by the respective purchaser. Title to the produced quantities transfers to the purchaser at the time the purchaser receives or collects the quantities. Prices for such production are defined in sales contracts and are readily determinable based on publicly available information. The purchasers of such production have historically made payment for crude oil and natural gas purchases within thirty-five days of the end of each production month. Cano periodically reviews the difference between the dates of production and the dates Cano collects payment for such production to ensure that accounts receivable from the purchasers are collectible. The point of sale for Cano's crude oil and natural gas production is at its applicable field tank batteries and gathering systems; therefore, Cano does not incur transportation costs related to its sales of crude oil and natural gas production.

III-96


Table of Contents

        As previously discussed, for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, Cano sold our crude oil and natural gas production to several independent purchasers. The following table shows purchasers that accounted for 10% or more of its total revenues:

 
  Year Ended June 30,  
 
  2009   2008   2007  

Valero Marketing Supply Co. 

    32 %   33 %   36 %

Coffeeville Resources Refinery and Marketing, LLC

    18 %   15 %   16 %

Plains Marketing, LP

    15 %   *     *  

Eagle Rock Field Services, LP

    13 %   18 %   18 %

DCP Midstream, LP

    10 %   14 %   17 %

*
Less than 10% of operating revenue

        In the event that one or more of these significant purchasers ceases doing business with Cano, Cano believes that there are potential alternative purchasers with whom it could establish new relationships and that those relationships would result in the replacement of one or more lost purchasers. Cano would not expect the loss of any single purchaser to have a long-term material adverse effect on its operations, though Cano may experience a short-term decrease in its revenues as Cano makes arrangements for alternative purchasers. However, the loss of a single purchaser could potentially reduce the competition for Cano's crude oil and natural gas production, which could negatively impact the prices it receives.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

        Cano accounts for share-based payment arrangements with employees and directors at their grant-date fair value and record the related expense over their respective vesting periods. The value of stock-based compensation is impacted by Cano's stock price, which has been highly volatile, and items that require management's judgment, such as expected lives and forfeiture rates.

Derivatives

        Cano is required to hedge a portion of its production at specified prices for oil and natural gas under its senior and subordinated credit agreements, as discussed in Note 6 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements. The purpose of the derivatives is to reduce Cano's exposure to declining commodity prices. By locking in minimum prices, Cano protects its cash flows which support its annual capital expenditure plans. Cano has entered into commodity derivatives that involve "costless collars" for its crude oil and natural gas sales. These derivatives are recorded as derivative assets and liabilities on its consolidated balance sheets based upon their respective fair values. Cano has entered into an interest rate basis swap contract to reduce its exposure to future interest rate increases.

        Cano does not designate its derivatives as cash flow or fair value hedges. Cano does not hold or issue derivatives for speculative or trading purposes. Cano is exposed to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to its commodity and interest rate swap derivatives. Cano anticipates, however, that its counterparties will be able to fully satisfy their respective obligations under Cano's commodity and interest rate swap derivatives contracts. Cano does not obtain collateral or other security to support its commodity derivatives contracts nor is Cano required to post any collateral. Cano monitors the credit standing of its counterparties to understand its credit risk.

        Changes in the fair values of Cano's derivative instruments and cash flows resulting from the settlement of Cano's derivative instruments are recorded in earnings as gains or losses on derivatives on Cano's consolidated statements of operations.

III-97


Table of Contents

New Accounting Pronouncements

        In June 2009, FASB issued a standard that established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™, which we refer to as ASC, and amended the hierarchy of GAAP such that the ASC became the single source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP. The ASC did not change current GAAP, but was intended to simplify user access to all authoritative GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. All previously existing accounting standard documents were superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the ASC is considered non-authoritative. New accounting standards issued subsequent to June 30, 2009 are communicated by the FASB through ASUs. The ASC became effective for Cano on July 1, 2009. This standard did not have an impact on Cano's financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Throughout the notes to the consolidated financial statements, references that were previously made to various former authoritative GAAP pronouncements have been conformed to the appropriate section of the ASC.

        In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC 805 (formerly SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations). Among other things, ASC 805 establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer in a business combination (i) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquired business, (ii) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase, and (iii) determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. ASC 805 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. Cano adopted ASC 805 on July 1, 2009. This standard will change Cano's accounting treatment for prospective business combinations.

        In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC 810 (formerly SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51). ASC 810 establishes accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. It also establishes a single method of accounting for changes in a parent's ownership interest in a subsidiary and requires expanded disclosures. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. Cano adopted SFAS No. 160 on July 1, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on Cano's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In March 2008, the FASB issued ASC 815 (formerly SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—An Amendment of FASB Statement 13). ASC 815 expands the required disclosures to discuss the uses of derivative instruments; the accounting for derivative instruments and related hedged items, and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect the company's financial position, financial performance and cash flows. Cano adopted ASC 815 on July 1, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on Cano's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In June 2008, the FASB issued ASC 260 (formerly EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities). ASC 260 addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and need to be included in the calculation of earnings per share under the two-class method. Under ASC 260, share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are "participating securities" and, therefore, should be included in computing earnings per share using the two-class method. ASC 260 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008. Cano adopted ASC 260 on July 1, 2009. The effect of adopting ASC 260 increased the number of shares used to compute earnings per share; however, the adoption of

III-98


Table of Contents


ASC 260 did not have a material impact on Cano's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In December 2008, the FASB issued ASC 815 (formerly EITF 07-5, Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity's Own Stock). ASC 815 affects companies that have provisions in their securities purchase agreements (for warrants and convertible instruments) that reset conversion prices based upon new issuances by companies at prices below the current conversion price of said instrument. Warrants and convertible instruments with such provisions will require the embedded derivative instrument to be bifurcated and separately accounted for as a derivative. Subject to certain exceptions, Cano's preferred stock provides for resetting the conversion price if Cano issues new common stock below $5.75 per share. ASC 815 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008. Cano adopted ASC 815 on July 1, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on Cano's financial position, results of operations or cash flows since the reset conversion provision did not meet the definition of a derivative since it was not readily net-cash settled.

        In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 855 (formerly SFAS 165, Subsequent Events) to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date, but prior to the issuance of financial statements. Specifically, ASC 855 sets forth: (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; (2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and (3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. ASC 855 is effective for financial statements issued for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. Cano adopted ASC 855 on June 30, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on Cano's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

        Cano's operations are exposed to market risks primarily as a result of changes in commodity prices and interest rates.

Interest Rate Risk

        Pursuant to Cano's credit agreements, it is subject to risks associated with interest rate fluctuations, as described under "—Credit Agreements." Cano has partially mitigated this risk by implementing an interest rate swap agreement, as discussed in Note 7 to its Consolidated Financial Statements. This agreement is effective through January 12, 2012 and establishes a fixed 1.73% LIBOR rate for $20.0 million in notional exposure. During Cano's fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, if there had been an increase in the interest rate of 1%, Cano's total interest cost would have increased by $0.3 million annually.

Commodity Risk

        Cano's revenues are derived from the sale of its crude oil and natural gas production. The prices for oil and natural gas are extremely volatile and sometimes experience large fluctuations as a result of relatively small changes in supplies, weather conditions, economic conditions and government actions. Pursuant to Cano's senior and subordinated credit agreements discussed in Note 6 to Cano's Consolidated Financial Statements, Cano is required to maintain its existing commodity derivative contracts, all of which have UBNA as Cano's counterparty. Cano has no obligation to enter into commodity derivative contracts in the future. Should Cano choose to enter into commodity derivative contracts to mitigate future price risk, Cano cannot enter into contracts for greater than 85% of its

III-99


Table of Contents


crude oil and natural gas production volumes attributable to proved producing reserves for a given month. Therefore, for the hedged production, Cano will receive at least the floor prices. As of June 30, 2009, Cano maintained the following commodity derivative contracts:

Time Period
  Floor
Oil Price
  Ceiling
Oil Price
  Barrels
Per Day
  Floor
Gas Price
  Ceiling
Gas Price
  Mcf
per Day
  Barrels of
Equivalent
Oil per Day
 

7/1/09 - 12/31/09

  $ 80.00   $ 110.90     367   $ 7.75   $ 10.60     1,667     644  

7/1/09 - 12/31/09

  $ 85.00   $ 104.40     233   $ 8.00   $ 10.15     1,133     422  

1/1/10 - 12/31/10

  $ 80.00   $ 108.20     333   $ 7.75   $ 9.85     1,567     594  

1/1/10 - 12/31/10

  $ 85.00   $ 101.50     233   $ 8.00   $ 9.40     1,033     406  

1/1/11 - 3/31/11

  $ 80.00   $ 107.30     333   $ 7.75   $ 11.60     1,467     578  

1/1/11 - 3/31/11

  $ 85.00   $ 100.50     200   $ 8.00   $ 11.05     967     361  

        Assuming that the prices that Cano receives for its crude oil and natural gas production are above the floor prices, based on Cano's actual fiscal year sales volumes for the year ended June 30, 2009, a 10% decline in the prices Cano receives for its crude oil and natural gas production would have had an approximate $2.5 million negative impact on Cano's revenues.

        Cano computed its mark-to-market valuations used for its commodity derivatives based on assumptions regarding forward prices, volatility and the time value of money. Cano compared its valuations to its counterparties' valuations to further validate its mark-to-market valuations. During the year ended June 30, 2009, Cano recognized an unrealized gain on commodity derivatives in its consolidated statements of operations amounting to $36.8 million. During the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, Cano recognized an unrealized loss on commodity derivatives in its consolidated statements of operations amounting to $29.4 million and $1.8 million, respectively.

        If crude oil prices fell $1 below Cano's hedged crude oil price floor, Cano would receive approximately $0.2 million annually due to having the crude oil price floor hedge in place. If natural gas prices fell $1 below Cano's hedged natural gas price floor, Cano would receive approximately $1.1 million annually due to having the natural gas price floor hedge in place.

        On September 11, 2009, Cano entered into two fixed price commodity swap contracts with its counterparty—Natixis, which is one of Cano's lenders under the senior credit agreement. The fixed price swaps are based on West Texas Intermediate NYMEX prices and are summarized in the table below.

Time Period
  Fixed
Oil Price
  Barrels
Per Day
 

4/1/11 - 12/31/11

  $ 75.90     700  

1/1/12 - 12/31/12

  $ 77.25     700  

III-100


Table of Contents

CHAPTER IV—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF RESACA

Overview of Resaca Relationship with Torch

        Resaca was formed in March 2006 by a group of independent investors led by Torch. From formation through July 31, 2007, Resaca functioned without employees and relied on the employees of Torch to manage the company and operate its properties under an Agreement for Operational, Accounting & Financial Services, which we refer to as the 2007 Services Agreement. On August 1, 2007, Dennis Hammond joined Torch as the President and Chief Operating Officer of Resaca. From that time until December 31, 2008, Mr. Hammond directed Torch employees in their provision of services to Resaca. Torch employees providing services to Resaca are co-employed by Resaca pursuant to the terms of the Co-Employment Agreement.

        On January 1, 2009, the 2007 Services Agreement was terminated and Torch employees began providing services to Resaca under the Services Agreement. The Services Agreement eliminated Torch's services as operator of Resaca's properties and provided solely for accounting and administrative services and remains in place. On January 1, 2009, the individuals who had been employed by Torch, but focused exclusively on Resaca, became employees of Resaca. These individuals included all the Torch employees based in Odessa, Texas as well as Mr. Hammond and Robert Porter, currently Resaca's Vice President of Engineering.

        After the merger is completed, the combined company may continue to utilize Torch's services under the Services Agreement, but to a lesser degree than prior to the merger. In addition, upon completion of the merger, one or more individuals currently employed by Torch will become employees of the combined company.

        The tables included in this Compensation Discussion & Analysis include information for individuals who served as executive officers of Resaca in fiscal 2009, individuals who will serve as executive officers of the combined company after the completion of the merger and Patrick M. McKinney, who, but for the fact that he resigned as Senior Vice President of Engineering and Operations of Cano effective as of May 11, 2010, would have been a Named Executive Officer of the combined company. The executive officers named below are current employees of either Resaca, Torch or Cano and are referred to as the Named Executive Officers.


Named Executive Officers for Resaca Pre-Merger

Name
  Current
Employer
  Current Position   Proposed Post
Merger Employer
  Post-Merger Position
John J. Lendrum, III   Torch   President and Chief Operating
Officer, Torch
Chief Executive Officer, Resaca
  Torch   President and Chief Operating
Officer, Torch
Vice Chairman, Resaca
Chris B. Work   Torch   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Torch
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Resaca
  Resaca   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Resaca
Dennis Hammond   Resaca   President and Chief Operating Officer, Resaca   Resaca   President and Chief Operating Officer, Resaca
Randy Ziebarth   Torch   Vice President—Operations, Torch
Vice President—Operations, Resaca
  Torch   Vice President—Operations, Torch
Mary Lou Fry   Torch   General Counsel, Vice President and Secretary, Torch
General Counsel, Vice President and Secretary, Resaca
  Torch   General Counsel, Vice President and Secretary, Torch
Robert Porter   Resaca   Vice President of Engineering, Resaca   Resaca   Vice President of Engineering, Resaca

IV-1


Table of Contents


Named Executive Officers for Resaca Post-Merger

Name
  Current Employer   Current Position   Proposed Post Merger Employer   Post-Merger Position
J.P. Bryan   Torch   Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, Torch
Chairman, Resaca
  Torch and Resaca   Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, Torch
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, Resaca
Chris B. Work   Torch   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Torch
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Resaca
  Resaca   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Resaca
Dennis Hammond   Resaca   President and Chief Operating Officer, Resaca   Resaca   President and Chief Operating Officer, Resaca
Patrick M. McKinney(1)   Cano   Senior Vice President of Engineering and Operations, Cano    
Michael J. Ricketts   Cano   Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer, Cano   Resaca   Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, Resaca
Phillip B. Feiner   Cano   Vice President and General Counsel, Cano   Resaca   Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Resaca

(1)
Mr. McKinney tendered his resignation as Senior Vice President of Engineering and Operations of Cano, effective as of May 11, 2010. But for his resignation, Mr. McKinney would have been a Named Executive Officer. Therefore, information on his compensation is included herein, in accordance with Item 402(a)(3)(iv) of Regulation S-K.

Executive Compensation

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Through its compensation programs, Resaca seeks to achieve the following general goals:

        In order to better accomplish the goals of its compensation program, Resaca established the compensation committee of the Resaca board of directors, which we refer to as the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee strives to ensure that Resaca's directors and senior executives are fairly compensated for their individual contributions to Resaca's overall performance by determining their pay and prerequisites while giving due regard to the interests of the shareholders and to the financial and commercial health of the company in making such compensation decisions.

        In considering compensation levels, the Compensation Committee evaluates both performance and overall compensation. The review of executive officers' performance includes a mix of financial and non-financial measures. In addition to business results, employees are expected to uphold a commitment to integrity, maximize the development of each individual, and continue to improve the environmental quality of Resaca's services and operations.

IV-2


Table of Contents

        Due to the unique nature of Resaca's reliance on certain employees of Torch, the Compensation Committee also reviews data on the amount of time billed by each Torch employee to Resaca and the charges associated with such billings. Under the Services Agreement, Resaca has the right to re-negotiate its service rates with Torch annually.

        In order to continue to attract and retain the best employees, the Compensation Committee believes the executive compensation packages provided to Resaca's executives, including the Named Executive Officers, should include both cash and stock-based compensation.

        The Compensation Committee has not retained a compensation consultant to review the compensation practices of Resaca's peers or to advise the Compensation Committee on compensation matters.

        Both Resaca's Compensation Committee and Chief Executive Officer consider public information regarding the compensation practices of likely competitors when reviewing and setting the compensation of all Resaca officers, including the Named Executive Officers.

Role of Chief Executive Officer in Compensation Decisions

        Periodically, Resaca's Chief Executive Officer considers the performance of each of the other Named Executive Officers and makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to the compensation of the Named Executive Officers, excluding himself. Resaca's Chief Executive Officer considers an individual's contribution and performance, competitive pressures and company performance in making his recommendations to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may accept, reject or adjust such recommendations in its sole discretion. The Compensation Committee has the sole responsibility for evaluating the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer.

Establishing Executive Compensation

        Consistent with its compensation objectives, the Compensation Committee has structured Resaca's annual and long-term incentive-based executive compensation to attract and retain the best talent, reward financial success and closely align executives' interests with Resaca's interests. In setting the compensation, the Compensation Committee reviews total direct compensation for the Named Executive Officers, which includes salary, annual cash incentives and long-term equity incentives. The appropriate level and mix of incentive compensation is not based upon a formula, but is a subjective determination made by the Compensation Committee.

IV-3


Table of Contents

Elements of Compensation

        For fiscal 2009 and prior years, the components of compensation for Resaca's Named Executive Officers included the following:

Element
  Form of Compensation   Purpose
Base Salary   Cash   Provide competitive, fixed compensation to attract and retain executive talent.

Short-Term Incentive

 

Cash Bonus

 

Create a strong financial incentive for achieving financial success and for the competitive retention of executives.

Long-Term Equity Incentive

 

Stock Option and Restricted Stock Grants

 

Provide incentives to strengthen alignment of executive team interests with Company interests, reward long-term achievement and promote executive retention.

Health, Retirement and Other Benefits

 

Eligibility to participate in plans generally available to our employees, including 401(k); health and life insurance and disability plans

 

Plans are part of broad-based employee benefits.

Executive Benefits and Perquisites

 

Club memberships and Parking Subsidy

 

Provide benefits to promote the health and wellness of employees.

Base Salary

        The Compensation Committee believes base salary is a critical element of executive compensation because it provides executives with a base level of monthly income. Resaca does not have a formal salary program with salary grades or salary ranges. Instead, salary increases are awarded periodically based on individual performance, when allowed by economic conditions. The Compensation Committee determines the base salary of each Named Executive Officer based on his or her position and responsibility. For Named Executive Officers other than the Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee also considers the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer.

Short-Term Incentive Compensation

        Resaca's short-term incentive compensation includes periodic cash bonus payments. Resaca's Compensation Committee has established bonus policy guidelines, which we refer to as the Bonus Policy Guidelines. Under the Bonus Policy Guidelines, the Compensation Committee establishes an annual bonus policy, the size of which is determined by management's progress in achieving improved performance in four key areas: production increases, oil and gas reserve increases, operating cost reductions and cash flow increases. Each area for improvement is weighted in importance, with production increases carrying the most weight. The Chief Executive Officer of Resaca then has the discretion to award bonuses from the pool to the Named Executive Officers and other key employees based on performance reviews. The Chief Executive Officer is not eligible to participate in the bonus program. No officer or employee is guaranteed bonus compensation. The Compensation Committee may, at its discretion, reduce the bonus pool in the event of negative safety or environmental incidents.

IV-4


Table of Contents

        Since bonuses under the policy are tied to the referenced performance criteria, conflicts of interest may arise in the preparation by management of financial information and reserve estimations to be used by the Compensation Committee to determine the annual bonus policy. Upon completion of the merger, Resaca intends to adopt several internal control procedures to address this potential for conflicts of interest. For example, upon completion of the merger, Resaca will adopt Cano's policies regarding internal controls over financial reporting, which will require that Resaca's financial statements and reserve estimates be in compliance with SEC rules, regulations and guidance and prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and SPE Standards. In addition, Resaca will engage independent third party accountants to audit and review its financial statements and engage independent third party petroleum engineers to prepare its reserve estimates. Our Chief Executive Officer, J.P. Bryan, our Chief Financial Officer, Chris Work, and our Chief Accounting Officer, Michael J. Ricketts, will be primarily responsible for overseeing the audit of the financial information used in setting the bonus pool, and our President and Chief Operating Officer, Dennis Hammond, will be primarily responsible for overseeing the preparation of our reserve estimates used in setting the bonus pool. Further, the financial information and reserve estimates to be used in the calculation of the bonus pool will be reviewed by Resaca's independent Audit Committee and Compensation Committee.

        Details of bonus payments made to the Named Executive Officers are included in the Summary Compensation table below.

Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation

        Long-term equity incentives encourage participants to focus on long-term performance and provide an opportunity for executive officers and certain designated key officers and employees to increase their stake in Resaca through grants of restricted common stock and stock options. Resaca has made awards of restricted common stock and stock options pursuant to the Incentive Plan. By using a mix of stock options and restricted stock grants, Resaca is able to compensate its Named Executive Officers and key employees for sustained increases in stock performance as well as long-term growth. The Compensation Committee determines whether to grant stock options or restricted stock by weighing the benefits and drawbacks of each type of award against the financial impact of such award on Resaca. Such determination is made at the time of the grant.

        Long-term equity incentive compensation is provided by Resaca in addition to base salary and bonus compensation. There is no pre-established policy or target for the allocation between either cash or non-cash or short-term and long-term incentive compensation; however, long-term incentives comprise a large portion of the total compensation package for executive officers and key employees. As reflected in the Summary Compensation Table, the long-term equity incentive compensation received by each of Resaca's Named Executive Officers as a percentage of their respective total compensation during fiscal 2009 was a follows: Mr. Bryan—77%; Mr. Lendrum—92%; Mr. Work—86%; Mr. McKinney—0%; Mr. Ricketts—0%; Mr. Hammond—94%; Ms. Fry—87%; Mr. Ziebarth—87%; Mr. Feiner—0% and Mr. Porter—0%. It is important to note that total compensation for several of the Named Executive Officers above reflects compensation from Torch. Specifically, base salaries for Mr. Bryan, Mr. Lendrum, Mr. Work, Ms. Fry and Mr. Ziebarth were paid by Torch. Base salaries for Mr. Hammond and Mr. Porter were paid by Torch for the July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 period and by Resaca for the January 1, 2009 to June 30, 2009 period. Base salaries for Mr. McKinney, Mr. Ricketts and Mr. Feiner were paid by Cano.

        For fiscal 2009, Resaca granted two forms of long-term incentives to directors, executive officers and key employees: stock options and restricted common stock. Stock options awarded included both incentive stock options and nonstatutory stock options. Going forward, the combined company will continue to use both stock options and restricted common stock as forms of incentive compensation and may consider other forms of incentive compensation as well, including stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units, all as provided for in the Incentive Plan, as amended by the Incentive Plan

IV-5


Table of Contents


Amendment. Of all stock option or restricted common stock employee and director awards made by Resaca during fiscal 2009, 29% were in the form of stock options and 71% were in the form of restricted common stock.

        The amounts of the stock option and restricted common stock awards made in fiscal 2009 were determined for all recipients, including Named Executive Officers, based on (1) input from Resaca's financial advisors and (2) senior management's perception of the past and likely future contribution of each individual to the success of Resaca.

        Specifically, Seymour Pierce, Resaca's nominated advisor and principal advisor in its initial public offering on the AIM, advised that directors, officers and key employees should have a "meaningful" share of ownership of Resaca, but an amount that would not exceed 10% of the total shares outstanding. Thus, the total number of shares made available under the Incentive Plan was initially established at 9,225,874, which was equal to 10% of the shares then expected to be outstanding. Senior management decided to award between 6% and 7% of the equity in Resaca to select directors and officers at the time of the initial public offering so as to meet Seymour Pierce's directive to provide meaningful ownership for management and directors while maintaining the ability to grant additional awards or options in the future and still stay within the suggested 10% limit.

        Having established the target 6% - 7% management and director ownership goal, senior management then established the percentages of ownership to be awarded to specific individuals. The restricted common stock and stock option award decisions were based on past business and individual performance, both qualitative and quantitative. Also, senior management considered the grant recipient's expected future performance when determining individual awards.

        Resaca has utilized restricted common stock awards to focus executives on long-term performance and to help align executive compensation more directly with shareholder value. Vesting of restricted common stock typically occurs ratably over three years, based solely on continued employment of the recipient-employee. In fiscal 2009, restricted common stock awards were made to a total of ten individuals: J.P. Bryan, two outside directors, one executive director and six officers. The awards covered 4,105,515 shares of common stock. In fiscal 2009, the Named Executive Officers received restricted common stock totaling 3,459,703 shares or 84% of the restricted common stock awarded. The remaining restricted common stock awards were made to outside directors and officers who are not Named Executive Officers.

        Under the Incentive Plan, stock options may be granted having exercise prices equal to the closing price of Resaca's stock on the date of the grant. Resaca's stock options generally vest ratably over three years, based on continued employment for the employee-recipient. Prior to the exercise of an option, the holder has no rights as a shareholder with respect to the shares subject to such option, including voting rights and the right to receive dividends or dividend equivalents. New option grants normally have a term of ten years, unless the grantee owns more than 10% of the outstanding stock of the combined company. In this case, the term of the award shall not exceed five years from the date of the grant.

        The purpose of stock options is to provide equity compensation with value that has been traditionally treated as entirely at-risk, based on the increase in our stock price and the creation of shareholder value. Stock options also allow Resaca's directors, executive officers and key employees to have equity ownership and to share in the appreciation of the value of Resaca's stock, thereby aligning their compensation directly with increases in stockholder value. Stock options only have value to their holder if the stock price appreciates in value from the date options are granted.

        In fiscal 2009, Resaca awarded 1,756,787 stock options to two individuals: an outside director and an officer. Of the 1,756,787 stock options awarded in fiscal 2009, 81% were awarded to a Named Executive Officer and the remainder were awarded to an outside director.

IV-6


Table of Contents

        Past and expected future business and individual contributions for Named Executive Officers who received equity awards in fiscal 2009 are described below. Resaca's equity awards were determined primarily on the basis of qualitative contributions. Please note that though Messrs. McKinney, Ricketts, Feiner and Porter are Named Executive Officers, none received equity awards from Resaca in fiscal 2009.

        J.P. Bryan:    Mr. Bryan's equity award was granted to him in his capacity as Chairman of Resaca's board. At that time, it was not contemplated that Mr. Bryan would serve as Chief Executive Officer of the combined company. Mr. Bryan's award of 230,647 restricted shares, representing 0.25% ownership of Resaca, was granted in recognition of his leadership ability and demonstrated previous energy business success. Specifically, as the Chief Executive Officer of Torch, Mr. Bryan led that company's successful management of over $3 billion in energy assets over a 27-year period. Mr. Bryan's experience as a director of other publicly-traded companies, including Bellwether Exploration Company, Nuevo Energy Company, Gulf Canada Resources Limited and AutoNation, Inc. was determined to be illustrative of the type of leadership he could bring to Resaca. Further, Mr. Bryan's key role in bringing together the initial equity investors in the Resaca partnership was crucial to the formation of Resaca.

        John J. Lendrum, III:    Mr. Lendrum was the visionary and the driving force behind the acquisition of the Resaca properties and the initial formation of Resaca. As President of Torch, Mr. Lendrum negotiated the terms of the acquisition and secured the original financing for the transaction. Post-acquisition, as Chief Executive Officer of Resaca, Mr. Lendrum provided strategic guidance for Resaca and led its initial public offering on the AIM in July 2008. At the time of the fiscal 2009 equity awards, Resaca's compensation committee considered Mr. Lendrum's ability to provide overall strategic guidance and that he would seek out and present attractive growth opportunities for Resaca, particularly acquisitions. In light of those major contributions and in anticipation of future service, the compensation committee elected to award Mr. Lendrum with 922,587 restricted shares of Resaca common stock, representing a 2.5% ownership interest in Resaca.

        Chris B. Work:    In fiscal 2009, Mr. Work received 461,294 restricted shares of Resaca common stock, which represented 0.50% ownership interest in the company. Mr. Work was a key contributor to the completion of Resaca's initial public offering on the AIM. He produced Resaca's financial reports from 2007 through 2009, managed the company's audits and coordinated the presentation of financial reports in Resaca's initial public offering document. Mr. Work additionally helped to prepare the disclosure in Resaca's initial public offering documents with respect to Resaca's properties and strategy. In addition, as the initial public offering was culminated, Mr. Work assumed an additional investor relations role, fielding questions from Resaca's shareholders. At the time of the awards, senior management anticipated that Mr. Work would continue to contribute in the areas of financial reporting, investor relations and acquisitions. Mr. Work's equity award was determined on the basis of these contributions.

        Dennis Hammond:    Prior to the initial public offering, Resaca's board determined that the company would benefit from an experienced oil and gas operations and engineering executive. Therefore, Mr. Hammond was hired to become Resaca's President and Chief Operating Officer. To induce Mr. Hammond to join Resaca, its compensation committee awarded Mr. Hammond equity in an amount equal to a 2.5% ownership interest in Resaca. Mr. Hammond's award reflected senior management's confidence in Mr. Hammond's ability to lead Resaca based on his prior operational accomplishments. These include co-founding two successful oil and gas exploitation companies, where Mr. Hammond managed all engineering and operational activities. In addition and prior to this experience, Mr. Hammond managed all exploitation operations for Nuevo Energy Company, a Torch-sponsored company. The compensation committee concluded Mr. Hammond's prior experience would benefit Resaca and that a 2.5% ownership interest was appropriate. Further, the compensation committee reasoned that Mr. Hammond's 2.5% ownership interest would provide powerful incentive for Mr. Hammond to maximize Resaca shareholder value.

IV-7


Table of Contents

        Randy Ziebarth:    As Torch's senior operations officer, Mr. Ziebarth supervised the valuation of the Resaca assets at the time of the acquisition in 2006. He conducted extensive analysis on the quality of the reserves, the field infrastructure and the secondary and tertiary recovery potential for the properties. Post-acquisition, as Vice President—Operations of Resaca, Mr. Ziebarth managed the operation of the Resaca properties, including developing and supervising all personnel in the field office and making all operational decisions. On the basis of this past business performance and anticipated continuing operational role, the compensation committee granted an equity award to Mr. Ziebarth in an amount equal to a 0.50% ownership interest in Resaca.

        Mary Lou Fry:    Ms. Fry was integral to the acquisition of the Resaca properties in 2006. As Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Torch, she managed the due diligence, negotiation and documentation of both the acquisition and the related financing. Post-acquisition, Ms. Fry managed all legal affairs for Resaca, including acting as Resaca's Corporate Secretary. As Resaca's Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Ms. Fry also managed the legal aspects of the initial public offering of Resaca's stock on the AIM. On the basis of these contributions, as well as the understanding that Ms. Fry would continue to perform legal functions on behalf of Resaca, senior management and the compensation committee determined that an equity award of a 0.50% ownership interest for Ms. Fry was appropriate.

        Details of all individual restricted common stock and stock option awards made by Resaca in fiscal 2009 follow:

Name
  Restricted
Common Stock
Awarded
  Stock
Options
Awarded
  Total
Awarded
  Awards as
% Total
Outstanding
Shares
  Individual
Awards as
% of Total
Awards
 

J.P. Bryan

    230,647     0     230,647     0.25 %   3.90 %

John J. Lendrum, III

    922,587     0     922,587     1.00 %   15.70 %

Chris B. Work

    461,294     0     461,294     0.50 %   7.90 %

Dennis Hammond

    922,587     1,383,881     2,306,468     2.50 %   39.30 %

Patrick M. McKinney

    0     0     0     0.00 %   0.00 %

Mary Lou Fry

    461,294     0     461,294     0.50 %   7.90 %

Randy Ziebarth

    461,294     0     461,294     0.50 %   7.90 %

Michael J. Ricketts

    0     0     0     0.00 %   0.00 %

Phillip B. Feiner

    0     0     0     0.00 %   0.00 %

Robert Porter

    0     0     0     0.00 %   0.00 %

Other Directors and Officers

    645,812     372,906     1,018,718     1.10 %   17.40 %
                       

Grand Totals

    4,105,515     1,756,787     5,862,302     6.35 %   100.00 %

        The Compensation Committee of the combined company intends to review both the annual incentive compensation program and the long-term incentive program annually to ensure that the program's key elements continue to meet the objectives described above.

IV-8


Table of Contents


Grants of Plan-Based Awards During Fiscal 2009

        Shown in the table below are the restricted stock and stock option grants to acquire Resaca common stock or Cano common stock made during Resaca's and Cano's fiscal year 2009 to the Named Executive Officers.

Grants of Plan Based Awards During Fiscal 2009  
Name
  Compensation
Committee
or Board
of Directors
Approval Date
  Grant
Date
  All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock
  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
  Exercise or
Base Price
of Option
Awards(a)
  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards
 

J.P. Bryan

    07/11/2008     07/17/2008     230,647           $ 618,999  

John J. Lendrum, III

    07/11/2008     07/17/2008     922,587           $ 2,475,995  

Chris B. Work

    07/11/2008     07/17/2008     461,294           $ 1,237,999  

Dennis Hammond

    07/11/2008     07/17/2008     922,587           $ 2,475,995  

    07/11/2008     07/17/2008         1,383,881     £1.30   $ 1,477,732  

Patrick M. McKinney

                      $  

Randy Ziebarth

    07/11/2008     07/17/2008     461,294           $ 1,237,999  

Mary Lou Fry

    07/11/2008     07/17/2008     461,294           $ 1,237,999  

Michael J. Ricketts

                      $  

Phillip B. Feiner

                      $  

Robert Porter

                      $  

(a)
The exercise price is equal to the offering price of Resaca common stock to the public in Resaca's initial public offering on AIM completed on July 17, 2008.

Outstanding Equity Awards at June 30, 2009

        The following table summarizes the total outstanding equity awards as of June 30, 2009 for each Named Executive Officer. The market value of the stock awards was based on the closing price of £0.26 per share for Resaca common stock which is $0.43 per share assuming an exchange rate of USD/GBP of $1.65872 per £1.00, and $0.95 per share for Cano common stock.

IV-9


Table of Contents

Name
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable(a)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercisable
Unearned
Options
  Option
Exercise
Price
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number of
Shares of
Stock That
Have not
Vested(b)
  Market
Value of
Shares of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
  Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares That
Have Not
Vested
  Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares That
Have Not
Vested
 

J.P. Bryan

                        230,647   $ 99,178          

John J. Lendrum, III

                        922,587   $ 396,712          

Chris B. Work

                        461,294   $ 198,356          

Dennis Hammond

        1,383,881         £1.30     07/17/2016     922,587   $ 396,712          

Patrick M. McKinney

    33,334     16,666       $ 5.42     12/28/2016     156,667   $ 148,834          

Randy Ziebarth

                        461,294   $ 198,356          

Mary Lou Fry

                        461,294   $ 198,356          

Michael J. Ricketts

    26,666     13,334       $ 5.42     12/28/2016     40,000   $ 38,000          

Phillip B. Feiner

    3,333     6,667       $ 5.75     02/19/18     20,000   $ 19,000          

        12,000       $ 6.15     06/30/17                  

Robert Porter

                          $          

(a)
The following table provides the vesting dates as of June 30, 2009 for unvested stock options:

Vesting Date
  Dennis Hammond   Patrick M.
McKinney
  Michael J.
Ricketts
  Phillip B.
Feiner
 

07/17/2009

    461,294                

12/28/2009

        16,667     13,334        

2/19/2010

                3,333  

06/30/2010

                12,000  

07/17/2010

    461,294                

02/19/2011

                3,334  

07/17/2011

    461,293                
(b)
The following table provides the vesting dates as of June 30, 2009 for unvested restricted shares:

Vesting Date
  J.P.
Bryan
  John J.
Lendrum, III
  Chris B.
Work
  Dennis
Hammond
  Patrick M.
McKinney
  Randy
Ziebarth
  Mary Lou
Fry
  Michael J.
Ricketts
  Phillip B.
Feiner
  Robert
Porter
 

07/17/2009

    76,882     307,529     153,765     307,529         153,765     153,765              

07/02/2009

                    38,333             10,000          

05/12/2010

                    40,000             10,000     10,000      

07/02/2010

                    38,334             10,000          

07/17/2010

    76,882     307,529     153,765     307,529         153,765     153,765              

05/12/2011

                    40,000             10,000     10,000      

07/17/2011

    76,883     307,529     153,764     307,529         153,764     153,764              

Total Unvested Stock Awards

    230,647     922,587     461,294     922,587     156,667     461,294     461,294     40,000     20,000      

        The Compensation Committee recommends to the board of directors the equity awards to be made to each Named Executive Officer or other officer or employee prior to the grant of such equity awards by the board of directors. Grants of equity may be made at any time during the year. We do not time the release of material non-public information with the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation.

        Stock Plan.    Resaca adopted the Incentive Plan on July 10, 2008. The Incentive Plan initially provided 9,225,874 shares of authorized but unissued shares of Resaca common stock to be awarded to Resaca's officers, directors, employees and consultants. Awards under the Incentive Plan can be made in various forms, including stock options, stock appreciation rights or restricted common stock grants. Stock option grant prices awarded under the Incentive Plan may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock subject to such option on the grant date, and the term of stock options may extend no more than ten years after the grant date. The Compensation Committee selects the officers, employees and consultants to whom the awards will be granted and determines the number and type of awards to be granted to such individual. Resaca's board of directors selects the non-employee directors

IV-10


Table of Contents


to whom awards will be granted and determines the number and type of award to be granted to such individuals. All of Resaca's employees, non-employee directors and consultants are eligible to receive awards under the Incentive Plan. The Incentive Plan has a term of ten years from the date of stockholder approval such that it expires on July 10, 2018. If Resaca shareholders approve the Incentive Plan Amendment, the Merger and Share Issuances and the Reverse Stock Split, then the number of shares of Resaca common stock authorized for issuance under the Incentive Plan will be increased, simultaneously with the merger and following the Reverse Stock Split, by 4,000,000 shares for a total of 5,845,175 shares available for issuance, subject to any shares previously granted, under the Incentive Plan.

Health, Retirement and Other Benefits

        401(k) Plan.    Effective January 1, 2009, Resaca initiated a 401(k) plan as part of its employee benefits package in order to retain quality personnel. This is a tax-qualified retirement savings plan under which all employees, including the Named Executive Officers who are employees of Resaca, are able to contribute to the plan the lesser of 60% of their annual salary and the limits prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service on a before-tax basis. Currently, Resaca matches 50% of employee contributions up to a maximum of 6% of the participant's gross salary, or as much as 3% of the participant's gross salary if the participant is contributing at least 6%. Resaca's matching contributions for all of its employees between January 1, 2009 and June 30, 2009 were approximately $17,736. All employee contributions to the plan are fully vested upon contribution; matching employer contributions vest over a six-year period of continuous service: 20% after two years, 40% after three years, 60% after four years, 80% after five years and 100% after six years.

        Health and Life.    Throughout the period from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009, Resaca purchased health insurance and other benefits programs on behalf of employees from The Guardian. Under these programs, Resaca offered major medical, dental, vision, life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance to all employees. Resaca also provided short term and long term disability benefits to employees, as well as up to ten days of sick pay as needed. The life insurance offered by Resaca was in amounts equal to up to two times annual earnings, subject to a $200,000 maximum and with limitations based on age. The short term disability program provided employees with a percentage of their normal earnings based upon tenure for a period of up to 180 days, subject to an elimination period. The long term disability program offered employees a benefit equal to 60% of monthly earnings subject to a maximum of $10,500 per month.

        For the period from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010, Resaca employees are offered benefits through Administaff, Inc., a professional employer organization, which we refer to as Administaff. These benefits include major medical, dental, vision, life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance benefits as well as disability benefits. In addition, Resaca offers eleven paid holidays per year and up to ten paid sick days per year. The life insurance benefits offered through the Administaff program are up to $50,000 per person. The disability program offers employees up to 60% of income (subject to a $10,000 per month maximum).

        Administaff does not provide services to well service workers. Therefore, effective January 1, 2010, nine individuals who are well service workers and former employees of Resaca, became employees of ROC. ROC employees are offered major medical, dental, vision, life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance as well as disability insurance. ROC employees are entitled to eleven paid holidays per year and up to ten paid sick days per year. The life insurance benefits offered to ROC employees are for an amount up to $50,000 with limitations based on age. The disability program offers employees up to 60% of income (subject to a $6,000 per month maximum).

IV-11


Table of Contents

Perquisites

        Resaca provides its employees with perquisites that are believed to be reasonable and consistent with the overall compensation program, to better enable Resaca to attract and retain superior employees for key positions, and to promote positive employee morale. The perquisites offered to Houston-based Resaca employees include a $113 per month transportation subsidy to be used to defray the cost of parking or pay for monthly bus fare and a 50% subsidy of the dues for a local club membership.

Director Compensation

        Each Resaca non-employee director receives annual compensation of $50,000, paid on a quarterly basis. In addition, on July 17, 2008, each director received a grant of either restricted common stock or stock options. Those shares and options vest over a three-year period. One third of these restricted shares and options vested on July 17, 2009. See the table below for additional information. We also reimburse the reasonable expenses incurred by our directors in attending meetings and other company business.

        Directors who are also full-time officers of Resaca receive no additional compensation for serving as directors. Currently, one member of the Resaca board of directors, John J. Lendrum, III, is also an executive officer of Resaca. Mr. Lendrum is an employee of Torch providing services to Resaca under the Services Agreement.

Name
  Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)
  Stock Awards(1)
($)
  Option Awards
($)
  Grant Date
Fair Market
Value
  Total
($)
 

Judy Ley Allen

  $ 50,000   $ 618,999       $ 618,999   $ 668,999  

John William Sharp Bentley

  $ 50,000       $ 344,805   $ 344,805   $ 394,805  

J.P. Bryan

  $ 50,000   $ 618,999       $ 618,999   $ 668,999  

Richard Kelly Plato

  $ 50,000   $ 618,999       $ 618,999   $ 668,999  

(1)
Aggregate Stock Awards and Option Awards Outstanding at the end of fiscal 2009:

Name
  Date of Award   # Shares   # Options   Vesting Date  

Judy Ley Allen

    07/17/08     76,882           07/17/09  

    07/17/08     76,882           07/17/10  

    07/17/08     76,883           07/17/11  

John William Sharp Bentley

   
07/17/08
         
107,635
   
07/17/09
 

    07/17/08           107,635     07/17/10  

    07/17/08           107,636     07/17/11  

J.P. Bryan

   
07/17/08
   
76,882
         
07/17/09
 

    07/17/08     76,882           07/17/10  

    07/17/08     76,883           07/17/11  

Richard Kelly Plato

   
07/17/08
   
76,882
         
07/17/09
 

    07/17/08     76,882           07/17/10  

    07/17/08     76,883           07/17/11  

IV-12


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

To the Stockholders of Resaca Exploitation, Inc.:

        The Compensation Committee of the board of directors has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion & Analysis, above, with management. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the board of directors that the Compensation Discussion & Analysis be included in this proxy statement for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 and the six month period ended December 31, 2009.

May 28, 2010   Compensation Committee

 

 

Judy Ley Allen
J.P. Bryan
John William Sharp Bentley


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

        The following narrative, tables and footnotes describe the "total compensation" earned during fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007 by the combined company's Named Executive Officers. The individual components of the total compensation reflected in the Summary Compensation Table are broken out below:

        Salary—The table reflects base salary earned during each of the relevant fiscal years. See "Compensation Discussion & Analysis—Elements of Compensation—Base Salary." Please note that several of the Named Executive Officers were employees of either Torch or Cano prior to the merger. Torch provides management services to Resaca under the Services Agreement. See "Compensation Discussion & Analysis—Overview of Resaca Relationship with Torch."

        Bonus—The table reflects cash bonus payments made to the Named Executive Officers in each of the relevant fiscal years. See "Compensation Discussion & Analysis—Elements of Compensation—Short-Term Incentive Compensation." Please note that Resaca has not paid bonus compensation to Named Executive Officers; those Named Executive Officers who received bonus pay were and are Torch employees. See "Compensation Discussion & Analysis—Overview of Resaca Relationship with Torch." Bonus payments made to Mr. McKinney, Mr. Ricketts and Mr. Feiner were paid by Cano.

        Stock Awards—Details of Resaca's stock and option awards can be found in "Compensation Discussion & Analysis—Elements of Compensation—Long-Term Incentive Compensation." As the first vesting date for stock and options awarded did not occur until after the end of fiscal 2009, the Named Executive Officers who were employees of Torch or Reseca did not earn additional compensation from stock options or restricted common stock in fiscal 2007, 2008 or 2009. Stock awards made to Mr. McKinney, Mr. Ricketts and Mr. Feiner were made by Cano.

        All Other Compensation—See "Compensation Discussion & Analysis—Health, Retirement and Other Benefits" and "Compensation Discussion & Analysis—Perquisites."

IV-13


Table of Contents

Summary Compensation Table

        The following table summarizes the total compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to the Named Executive Officers. This table and the accompanying narrative should be read in conjunction with the Compensation Discussion & Analysis, which sets forth the objectives and other information regarding our executive compensation program.

Name and Principal Position (a)
  Year   Salary(b)   Bonus   Stock
Awards(c)
  Option
Awards(d)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
  All Other
Compensation(e)
  Total  

J.P. Bryan,

    2009   $ 178,750   $   $ 618,999   $   $   $ 7,194   $ 804,943  
 

Chairman of the

    2008   $ 250,000   $   $   $   $   $ 8,544   $ 258,544  
 

Board(f)

    2007   $ 250,000   $   $   $   $   $ 5,731   $ 255,731  

John J. Lendrum, III

   
2009
 
$

200,000
 
$

 
$

2,475,995
 
$

 
$

 
$

6,509
 
$

2,682,504
 
 

Vice Chairman and

    2008   $ 185,417   $   $   $   $   $ 6,424   $ 191,841  
 

Chief Executive

    2007   $ 175,000   $   $   $   $   $ 5,225   $ 180,225  
 

Officer(g)

                                                 

Chris B. Work,

   
2009
 
$

190,000
 
$

 
$

1,237,999
 
$

 
$

 
$

6,817
 
$

1,434,816
 
 

Vice President and

    2008   $ 148,333   $ 40,000   $   $   $   $ 5,381   $ 193,714  
 

Chief Financial Officer(h)

    2007   $ 52,500   $ 10,000   $   $   $   $ 2,279   $ 64,779  

Dennis Hammond,

   
2009
 
$

250,000
 
$

 
$

2,475,995
 
$

1,477,732
 
$

 
$

8,866
 
$

4,212,593
 
 

President and Chief

    2008   $ 229,167   $   $   $   $   $ 7,493   $ 236,660  
 

Operating Officer(i)

    2007   $   $   $   $   $   $   $  

Patrick M. McKinney,

   
2009
 
$

250,000
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

50,000
 
$

14,399
 
$

314,399
 
 

Senior Vice President of

    2008   $ 250,000   $   $ 1,535,600   $   $ 16,212   $ 1,385   $ 1,803,197  
 

Engineering and Operations(j)

    2007   $ 194,375   $ 150,000   $   $ 127,000   $   $   $ 471,375  

Randy Ziebarth,

   
2009
 
$

175,000
 
$

 
$

1,237,999
 
$

 
$

 
$

6,821
 
$

1,419,820
 
 

Vice President—

    2008   $ 160,417   $ 50,000   $   $   $   $ 8,039   $ 218,456  
 

Operations(k)

    2007   $ 150,000   $   $   $   $   $ 6,459   $ 156,459  

Mary Lou Fry,

   
2009
 
$

175,000
 
$

 
$

1,237,999
 
$

 
$

 
$

6,786
 
$

1,419,785
 
 

Vice President,

    2008   $ 154,583   $ 50,000   $   $   $   $ 7,851   $ 212,434  
 

General Counsel, and

    2007   $ 140,000   $   $   $   $   $ 6,173   $ 146,173  
 

Secretary(l)

                                                 

Michael J. Ricketts,

   
2009
 
$

187,000
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

25,000
 
$

11,433
 
$

223,433
 
 

Vice President and Principal

    2008   $ 187,000   $   $ 391,000   $   $ 30,000   $ 748   $ 608,748  
 

Accounting Officer(m)

    2007   $ 175,000   $ 93,000   $   $ 101,600   $   $   $ 369,600  

Phillip B. Feiner

   
2009
 
$

150,000
   
 
$

 
$

 
$

25,000
 
$

1,503
 
$

176,503
 
 

Vice President and

    2008   $ 143,118   $ 23,000   $ 216,000   $ 26,700   $ 10,000       $ 418,818  
 

General counsel(n)

    2007                 32,160             32,160  

Robert Porter,

   
2009
 
$

152,127
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

1,017
 
$

153,144
 
 

Vice President of

    2008   $   $   $   $   $   $   $  
 

Engineering(o)

    2007   $   $   $   $   $   $   $  
(a)
Name and principal position with Resaca or Cano, as applicable, prior to completion of the merger.

(b)
Salary and Bonus information included herein reflects salary and bonus amounts paid to the listed individual by his or her employer for the relevant fiscal year. The employer of Messrs. Bryan, Lendrum, Work, and Ziebarth and Ms. Fry was Torch. The employer of Messrs. Hammond and Porter was Resaca. The employer of Messrs. McKinney, Ricketts and Feiner was Cano.

(c)
Amounts reported reflect the grant date fair value dollar amounts for financial statement reporting purposes in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007 in accordance with ASC Topic 718), "Share Based Payment" and includes awards granted in prior periods. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. The restricted stock granted to Messrs. McKinney, Ricketts and Feiner was granted under the Cano 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The restricted stock granted to Messrs. Bryan, Lendrum, Work, Hammond and Ziebarth and Ms. Fry was granted under the Incentive Plan. In both cases, the ultimate amount realized may be significantly more or less than the amount shown depending on the price of Resaca common stock or Cano common stock as applicable at the time of vesting or the time of sale of the restricted stock.

IV-14


Table of Contents

(d)
Amounts reported reflect the grant date fair value dollar amounts for financial statement reporting purposes in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007 in accordance with ASC Topic 718, "Share Based Payment" and includes awards granted in prior periods. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. Stock options granted to Messrs. McKinney, Ricketts and Feiner were granted under the Cano 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Stock options granted to Mr. Hammond were granted under the Incentive Plan. In both cases, the ultimate amount realized may be significantly more or less than the amount shown depending on the price of Resaca's and/or Cano's common stock at the time of exercise.

(e)
For Messrs. Bryan, Lendrum, Work, Hammond, Ziebarth and Porter and Ms. Fry, "All Other Compensation" consists of the total of parking allowances and Resaca 401(k) contributions. For Messrs. McKinney, Rickets and Feiner, "All Other Compensation" consists of Cano 401(k) contributions.

(f)
Following the completion of the merger, Mr. Bryan will serve as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Resaca.

(g)
Following the completion of the merger, Mr. Lendrum will serve as Vice Chairman of the Board of Resaca.

(h)
Mr. Work began employment with Torch in February 2007, so his compensation for fiscal year 2007 reflects a partial year. Following the completion of the merger, Mr. Work will serve as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Resaca.

(i)
Mr. Hammond became a Torch employee dedicated to working on Resaca matters in August of 2007, so he did not receive any compensation from either Torch or Resaca in Resaca's fiscal year 2007. His compensation in Resaca's fiscal year 2008 was from Torch. Mr. Hammond became a Resaca employee on January 1, 2009. Therefore, his fiscal 2009 compensation includes amounts paid by Torch (for the period from July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008) and amounts paid by Resaca (for the period from January 1, 2009 to June 30, 2009). Following the completion of the merger, Mr. Hammond will serve as President and Chief Operating Officer of Resaca.

(j)
Compensation amounts disclosed herein were paid to Mr. McKinney by Cano. Mr. McKinney tendered his resignation as the Senior Vice President of Engineering and Operations of Cano, effective as of May 11, 2010.

(k)
Following the completion of the merger, Mr. Ziebarth will not serve as an officer of Resaca and Mr. Ziebarth will continue to be co-employed by Torch and Resaca.

(l)
Following the completion of the merger, Ms. Fry will not serve as an officer of Resaca and Ms. Fry will continue to be co-employed by Torch and Resaca.

(m)
Compensation amounts disclosed herein were paid to Mr. Ricketts by Cano. Following the completion of the merger, Mr. Ricketts will be employed by Resaca as Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer.

(n)
Compensation amounts disclosed herein were paid to Mr. Feiner by Cano. Following the completion of the merger, Mr. Feiner will serve as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Resaca.

(o)
Robert Porter joined Torch in 2008 as Vice President of Engineering for Resaca. He became a full time Resaca employee on January 1, 2009. Following the completion of the merger, Mr. Porter will serve as Vice President of Engineering.

Pension Benefits

        Resaca's only retirement plan for employees, including the Named Executive Officers, is Resaca's 401(k) plan. Resaca does not have a pension plan in which the Named Executive Officers, or any other officers or employees, are eligible to participate.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

        Resaca does not have a non-qualified deferred compensation plan.

Potential Payments Upon a Change of Control or Termination

        Resaca has only entered into one employment contract. Resaca entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Dennis Hammond, President and Chief Operating Officer of Resaca and Torch, effective as of January 1, 2009, which we refer to as the Hammond Employment Agreement. Under the terms of the Hammond Employment Agreement, Mr. Hammond, Resaca and Torch mutually agree that Mr. Hammond shall serve as President and Chief Operating Officer of Resaca in return for certain compensation, including (1) a base salary of $250,000 per year, (2) benefits in accordance with Resaca's health and other benefits programs and (3) 1,383,881 stock options and 922,587 shares of restricted common stock. In addition, the Hammond Employment Agreement

IV-15


Table of Contents


provides that Mr. Hammond shall be eligible to receive additional compensation as determined by the board of the combined company. The Hammond Employment Agreement terminates on August 1, 2010.

        The Hammond Employment Agreement provides that if Resaca terminates the Hammond Employment Agreement for any reason other than for cause or due to Mr. Hammond's death or disability, Resaca is required to pay Mr. Hammond his base salary for the remaining term under the Hammond Employment Agreement, or until August 1, 2010. The Hammond Employment Agreement does not provide for immediate vesting of restricted stock or stock options in the event of termination by Resaca. The table below quantifies the amounts that would be due to Mr. Hammond under the Hammond Employment Agreement in the event of an early termination:

Termination Month
  Months
Remaining
  Gross Pay Due
Mr. Hammond
 

02/01/10

    6   $ 125,000.00  

03/01/10

    5   $ 104,166.67  

04/01/10

    4   $ 83,333.33  

05/01/10

    3   $ 62,500.00  

06/01/10

    2   $ 41,666.67  

07/01/10

    1   $ 20,833.33  

08/01/10 and beyond

    0   $  

        The Incentive Plan calls for accelerated vesting of stock or option awards in the event of a change of control and the award agreements under the Incentive Plan call for accelerated vesting upon termination of employment, as described below. However, the Incentive Plan also provides that the Resaca board of directors may override this provision if it is in the best interest of Resaca. The board of directors has chosen to override the change of control provision of the Incentive Plan with respect to the merger. Since Mr. Plato will no longer serve as a director of Resaca following the completion of the merger, his options to purchase Resaca common stock will vest in full upon the completion of the merger.

        In the event of a "change of control," (a) all of the stock options and stock appreciation rights then outstanding shall become 100% vested and immediately exercisable; (b) all of the restrictions and conditions of any restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and any other stock based awards then outstanding shall be deemed satisfied, and the restriction period with respect thereto shall be deemed to have expired, and thus each incentive award shall become free of all restrictions and fully vested; and (c) all of the performance-based awards shall become fully vested, deemed earned in full, and promptly paid within thirty (30) days to the affected grantees without regard to payment schedules and notwithstanding that the applicable payment cycle, retention cycle, or other restrictions and conditions have not been completed or satisfied.

        The Incentive Plan defines a "change of control" as (a) acquisition of 50% or more of the voting stock of the company; (b) occurring when the current board members no longer constitute a majority on the board; (c) approval by the shareholders of a merger; (d) the sale of substantially all of the assets of the company; or (e) the adoption of a plan or proposal to liquidate the company's assets.

        If a change in control or termination of employment as described above were to have occurred as of June 30, 2009, shares of restricted stock and options held by our Named Executive Officers would have automatically vested, as follows:

IV-16


Table of Contents

As of September 25, 2009, Mr. Porter held 320,000 non-qualifying stock options that would have become fully vested as a result of such change in control.


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

        During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, our Compensation Committee was composed of Messrs. Allen, Bryan and Bentley. No member of the Compensation Committee was an officer or employee of Resaca during such fiscal year. None of our executive officers served on the board of directors or the compensation committee of any other entity for which any officers of such other entity served either on our board of directors or our Compensation Committee, with the exception of Mr. Lendrum and Mr. Bryan. Mr. Lendrum was, and is, an executive officer of Resaca as its Chief Executive Officer and he sits on the board of directors of Torch. Mr. Bryan was, and is, an executive officer of Torch as its Chief Executive Officer and he sits on the board of directors and the compensation committee of Resaca. In connection with the merger, Mr. Lendrum will resign as Chief Executive Officer of Resaca and will no longer serve Resaca as an executive officer. Mr. Bryan will serve, post merger, as an executive officer of both Torch and Resaca. The combined company will designate the members of its board committees immediately following the completion of the merger and each committee will be reconstituted. As such, it is contemplated that the Compensation Committee of Resaca will be reconstituted upon the trading of Resaca common stock on NYSE Amex and again post-merger and Mr. Bryan will not continue to serve as a member of this committee. While Resaca has not determined which directors will serve on its Board committees at this time, pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, during the one year period following the consummation of the merger, each committee shall consist of four directors, at least two of whom will be directors who served on Cano's board of directors prior to the consummation of the merger.


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

        Transactions with related persons are reviewed, approved or ratified in accordance with the policies and procedures set forth in Resaca's Employee Handbook, Audit Committee charter, the procedures described below with respect to director and officer questionnaires and the other procedures described below.

        Resaca's code of ethics and business conduct provides that directors, officers, and employees must avoid any action that may involve, or may appear to involve conflicts of interest with regard to the combined company. Exceptions may only be made after review of fully disclosed information and approval of specific or general categories by senior management (in the case of employees) or the board of directors (in the case of officers or directors). Any employee, officer or director who becomes aware of a conflict or potential conflict of interest should bring the matter to the attention of a supervisor or other appropriate personnel.

IV-17


Table of Contents

        A conflict of interest exists when a person's private interest interferes in any way with the interests of the combined company. Conflicts of interest generally interfere with the person's effective and objective performance of his or her duties or responsibilities to the combined company. Our code of business ethics and conduct sets forth several examples of how conflicts of interest may arise, including when:

        Resaca's audit committee also has the responsibility, according to its charter, to review, assess and approve or disapprove conflicts of interest and related-party transactions.

        Each year Resaca requires all directors, nominees for director and executive officers to complete and sign a questionnaire in connection with the solicitation of proxies for use at the annual general meeting of members. The purpose of the questionnaire is to obtain information, including information regarding transactions with related persons, for inclusion in Resaca's proxy statement or annual report.

Rig Acquisition

The Transaction

        In July 2009, Resaca announced that it had reached agreement with PBWS to acquire a number of workover rigs, reversing units and related assets as well as real estate. Pursuant to the terms of the asset transfer agreement between Resaca and PBWS, Resaca acquired Equipment and the Office Space. In December 2009, Resaca vacated its prior offices and moved into the Office Space. Since Resaca's formation in 2006, PBWS had provided approximately 40%-60% of Resaca's workover and reversing unit services. These services were provided to Resaca on a priority basis, and the hourly rates were charged in accordance with industry rates. Resaca concluded, however, that there were economic and operational benefits to be gained from owning and operating the Equipment and owning the Office Space.

Related Persons and the Interests of Related Persons in the Transaction

        Torch E&P was issued 3,320,250 shares of Resaca common stock under the terms of the asset transfer agreement entered into by Resaca and PBWS. Torch E&P is a shareholder of Resaca and the parent company of PBWS. Torch E&P is 90%-owned by J.P. Bryan, Resaca's Chairman of the board of directors and 10%-owned by John J. Lendrum, III, Resaca's Chief Executive Officer. At the request of PBWS, the shares issued pursuant to the asset transfer agreement were issued directly to Torch E&P.

IV-18


Table of Contents

Value of the Transaction

        The assets acquired by Resaca pursuant to the asset transfer agreement were valued by two independent appraisers, an equipment specialist and a real estate specialist. The value ascribed to the assets by the independent appraiser was $1,593,720. Resaca paid consideration of $1,593,720 for the assets in the form of 3,320,250 new shares of Resaca common stock issued by Resaca for this purpose and representing 3.5% of the enlarged issued share capital of Resaca. The number of shares of Resaca common stock issued to Torch E&P was determined by dividing the purchase price by $0.48, which reflects the July 6, 2009 closing stock price on the AIM of £0.295 per share, converted at an exchange rate of U.S. $1.627 per British pound. The July 6, 2009 price reflects an approximate 12% premium over the trailing 30 day share price. As a 90% owner of Torch E&P, Mr. Bryan's interest in the consideration paid by Resaca for the Rig Acquisition is $1,434,348 and as a 10% owner of Torch E&P, Mr. Lendrum's interest in the consideration paid by Resaca for the Rig Acquisition is $159,372.

Other Information

        The asset transfer agreement requires the ratification of the Rig Acquisition by Resaca's shareholders. On July 6, 2009, the transaction was approved by an independent committee of the Resaca board of directors, which was comprised of Judy Ley Allen, Richard Kelly Plato, and John William Sharp Bentley.

The Services Agreement

The Transaction

        Since its formation Resaca has had the Services Agreement, as amended, with Torch and TES. On January 1, 2009, Resaca entered into the Services Agreement with Torch and TES. Under the Services Agreement, Torch and TES provide a variety of corporate services to Resaca including office administration, risk management, corporate secretarial support, legal services, corporate and litigation legal services, graphic services, tax department services, financial planning and analysis, information management, financial reporting and accounting services, and engineering and technical services as well as office space and office support for Resaca's employees in Houston. In addition, TES makes certain of the vehicles in its fleet available to Resaca. Resaca pays a per mile rate for the use of these vehicles. Resaca pays a monthly fee to Torch and TES for services rendered and for the use of TES vehicles.

Related Persons and the Interests of Related Persons in the Transaction

        Both Torch and TES are owned by J.P Bryan, Resaca's Chairman of the Board and John J. Lendrum, III, Resaca's Chief Executive Officer. Messrs. Bryan and Lendrum own 90% and 10% ownership interests, respectively, in Torch and TES. As such, Messrs. Bryan and Lendrum have a 90% and 10% interest, respectively, in all fees paid to Torch and TES pursuant to the Services Agreement. The shareholders of Resaca approved the Services Agreement, as amended, at a special meeting on June 4, 2008.

Value of the Transaction

        From January 1, 2009 to June 30, 2009, Resaca paid $657,389 to Torch and TES for services and vehicle use provided pursuant to the Services Agreement.

Torch Subordination Letter Agreement

        Resaca entered into an agreement with Torch on May 14, 2010 which requires that on June 30, 2010, unless the CIT Facility has been repaid in full or refinanced, all amounts that Resaca owes to Torch at such time under the Services Agreement will be evidenced by a written promissory note payable to Torch. As of March 31, 2010, Resaca owes Torch $1,755,647 under the Services Agreement. Interest on such promissory note will accrue at the prime rate announced from time to time by Amegy

IV-19


Table of Contents


Bank N.A. plus 2.0%, which is the same rate of interest that Torch may apply to all over due amounts under the terms of the Services Agreement. All principal and accrued interest on the promissory note will be due and payable at maturity on October 1, 2012 (or, if earlier, two business days after the CIT Facility is repaid from the proceeds of an issuance of Resaca equity or 91 days after the CIT Facility is refinanced or repaid with funds from any other sources). Such promissory note will also be subordinated to all amounts that Resaca owes under the CIT Facility.

Other

        On October 20, 2009, Cano entered into a Stock Voting Agreement with S. Jeffrey Johnson, its Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of its board of directors, which provides, among other things, that Mr. Johnson will vote all of his shares of Cano stock in favor of the Series D Amendment. Mr. Johnson owns approximately 3.6% of the Cano preferred stock. During the nine months ended March 31, 2010, Cano paid Mr. Johnson a cash preferred dividend payment of approximately $59,000.

Policies Related to Related Party Transactions

        At such time as the combined company becomes subject to SEC rules and regulations or the NYSE Amex Company Guide, the "Approval of Related Party Transactions" section of the Audit Committee's charter shall become applicable. The combined company shall not enter into a related party transaction unless such transaction is reviewed for potential conflicts of interest by the Audit Committee and is approved by the Audit Committee. Under the Audit Committee charter, a transaction will be considered a "related party transaction" if the transaction would be required to be disclosed under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. The related party transactions described in this section occurred prior to adoption of these policies, and as such, these transactions were not subject to the approval and review procedures described above, although the Rig Acquisition and the Services Agreement were approved by our board in a manner consistent with the Audit Committee's charter.

IV-20


Table of Contents


EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

        The following table summarizes certain information regarding securities authorized for issuance under Resaca's equity compensation plans as of May 28, 2010, prior to effectuating the Incentive Plan Amendment, the merger and the Reverse Stock Split.

Plan Category
  Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options
(a)
  Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price of
Outstanding
Options(1)
(b)
  Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Vesting of
Outstanding
Restricted Shares
(c)
  Number Of
Securities
Remaining
Available for
Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities Reflected
in Column (a)
and (c))(2)
(d)
 

Equity Compensation Plans Approved By Security Holders

    2,301,787   $ 1.66     2,737,010     2,818,572  

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved By Security Holders

   
NA
   
NA
   
NA
   
NA
 

Total

   
2,301,787
 
$

1.66
   
2,737,010
   
2,818,572
 

(1)
Weighted Average price of outstanding options as of May 28, 2010 is calculated as follows:

Grant Date
  No. Options   Exercise Price ($)  

07/17/2008

    1,706,787   $ 1.98  

09/25/2009

    395,000   $ 0.76  

11/16/2009

    200,000   $ 0.71  

Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share

  $ 1.66  
(2)
The Incentive Plan initially made 9,225,874 shares available for incentive compensation. As of May 28, 2010, 4,105,515 had been awarded in restricted stock (1,368,505 of which have vested) and 2,301,787 had been awarded in stock options leaving 2,818,572 shares available in for future issuance.

Indemnification of Directors and Officers

        Resaca's charter provides that Resaca shall indemnify any person who was, is or is threatened to be made a party to a proceeding (as hereinafter defined) by reason of the fact that he or she (1) is or was a director or officer of Resaca or (2) while a director or officer of Resaca, is or was serving at the request of Resaca as a director, officer, partner, venturer, proprietor, trustee, employee, agent or similar functionary of any foreign or domestic corporation, partnership, joint venture, sole proprietorship, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise, to the fullest extent permitted under the TBOC as the same exists or may hereafter be amended. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Resaca shall indemnify any such person in connection with a proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such person only if such proceeding (or part thereof) was authorized by the Board. Such rights shall be contract rights and as such shall run to the benefit of any director or officer who is elected and accepts the position of the director or officer of Resaca or elects to continue to serve as a director or officer of Resaca while this provision of the certificate of formation is in effect. Any repeal or amendment of this provision of the certificate of formation shall be prospective only and shall not limit the rights of any such director or officer or the obligations of Resaca with respect to any claim arising from or related to the services of such director or officer in any of the foregoing capacities prior to any such repeal or amendment. Such right shall include the right to be paid by Resaca expenses incurred in defending any such proceeding in advance of its final disposition to the maximum extent permitted under the TBOC.

IV-21


Table of Contents


If a claim for indemnification or advancement of expenses hereunder is not paid in full by Resaca within sixty (60) days after a written claim has been received by Resaca, the claimant may at any time thereafter bring suit against Resaca to recover the unpaid amount of the claim, and if successful in whole or in part, the claimant shall also be entitled to be paid the expenses of prosecuting such claim. It shall be a defense to any such action that such indemnification or advancement of costs of defense are not permitted under the TBOC, but the burden of proving such defense shall be on Resaca. Neither the failure of Resaca (including the Board or any committee thereof, independent legal counsel, or stockholders) to have made its determination prior to the commencement of such action that indemnification of, or advancement of costs of defense to, the claimant, is permissible in the circumstances nor an actual determination by Resaca (including the Board or any committee thereof, independent legal counsel, or stockholders) that such indemnification or advancement is not permissible shall be a defense to the action or create a presumption that such indemnification by Resaca is not permissible. In the event of the death of any person having rights of indemnification, such rights shall inure to the benefit of his or her heirs, executors, administrators and personal representatives. These rights shall not be exclusive of any other right which any person may have or hereafter acquire under any statute, bylaw, resolution of stockholders or directors, agreement or otherwise. The Company may additionally indemnify any employee or agent of Resaca to the fullest extent permitted by law. As used herein, the term "proceeding" means any threatened pending, or completed action, suit, or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, arbitrative or investigative, any appeal in such an action, suit, or proceeding, and any inquiry or investigation that could lead to such an action, suit or proceeding.

IV-22


Table of Contents


COMPARISON OF STOCKHOLDER RETURN

        The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on Resaca common stock with the cumulative total return of a peer group consisting of: (i) Cano Petroleum, Inc., listed on NYSE Amex under the symbol "CFW"; (ii) Warren Resources, Inc., listed on NASDAQ under the symbol "WRES"; (iii) Ram Energy Resources, Inc., listed on NASDAQ under the symbol "RAME"; (iv) Parallel Petroleum Corporation, listed on NASDAQ under the symbol "PLLL"; (v) Arena Resources Inc., listed on NYSE under the symbol "ARD"; and (vi) Abraxas Petroleum Corp., listed on NASDAQ under the symbol "(AXAS); and the NYSE Amex Oil Index.

        The graph covers the period from July 17, 2008, the date Resaca common stock started trading, through May 28, 2010, and assumes that $100 was invested on July 17, 2008, and any dividends were reinvested. No dividends have been declared or paid on Resaca's common stock. Stockholder returns over the period indicated should not be considered indicative of future stockholder returns. The information contained in the Performance Graph shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Resaca specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.


Comparison of Cumulative Return among
Resaca Exploitation, Inc.,
Peer Group and NYSE Amex Oil Index

GRAPHIC

ASSUMES $100 INVESTED ON JULY 17, 2008
ASSUMES DIVIDEND REINVESTED
FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2009

IV-23


Table of Contents

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

        The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of Resaca common stock on a fully-diluted basis, as of May 28, 2010, after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split and the Rig Acquisition (assuming ownership of Resaca common stock is unchanged since May 28, 2010) but not giving effect to the merger or the issuance of Resaca common stock and Resaca preferred stock in conjunction with the merger, both by:

        Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with applicable SEC rules, under which a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities if he or she has or shares voting power or investment power with respect to such securities or has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of May 28, 2010. Percentage of ownership is based on 19,503,285 shares of Resaca common stock outstanding on May 28, 2010, assuming the exercise of all outstanding stock options of Resaca totaling 113,786 options. Unless otherwise indicated, to the knowledge of Resaca, the persons listed in the table below have sole voting and investment powers with respect to the shares indicated. The address of Resaca directors and officers is 1331 Lamar, Suite 1450, Houston, Texas 77010.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
  Amount and Nature
of Beneficial Ownership
  Percent
of Ownership
 

Torch E&P Company(1)
1331 Lamar
Suite 1450
Houston, Texas 77010

    3,212,455     16.5 %

Legal & General Investment Management
Bucklersbury House
London
EC4N 8NH

    2,067,844     10.6 %

Asset Value Investors
Bennett House
London
SW1A 1JT

    1,453,437     7.5 %

NGP Capital Resources Company
1221 McKinney Street
Suite 2975
Houston, Texas 77010
Attn. R. Kelly Plato

    1,330,220     6.8 %

SDG Holdings LLC
1803 E. Pavilion Place
Montrose, Colorado 81401

    1,024,556     5.3 %

Goodman & Company Investment Counsel
Scotia Plaza
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 4A9
Canada

    1,000,000     5.1 %

J.P. Bryan(2)(4)

    3,570,047     18.3 %
 

Chairman of the Board and Director

             

IV-24


Table of Contents

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
  Amount and Nature
of Beneficial Ownership
  Percent
of Ownership
 

Dennis Hammond

    154,204 **   *  
 

President and Chief Operating Officer

             

John J. Lendrum, III(4)

    113,499     *  
 

Chief Executive Officer and Director

             

Randy Ziebarth

    24,153     *  
 

Vice President

             

John William Sharp Bentley

    21,527 **   *  
 

Director

             

Chris B. Work

    21,033     *  
 

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

             

Judy Ley Allen

    15,376     *  
 

Director

             

Mary Lou Fry

    7,845     *  
 

Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

             

Lisa Cohen(4)

    6,150     *  
 

Vice President and Treasurer

             

Ralph Carthrae(4)

    4,132     *  
 

Vice President—Marketing of Resaca

             

Richard Kelly Plato(3)

    46,129     *  
 

Director

             

All Officers and Directors as a group***

    3,984,095     20.4 %

*
Less than 1%

**
This amount includes stock options.

***
All titles for the Officers and Directors are presented on a pre-merger basis.

(1)
The 3,212,455 shares owned by Torch E&P Company are also reflected in the share holdings of J.P. Bryan.

(2)
The beneficial ownership of the following shares of Resaca common stock are attributable to Mr. Bryan: (i) 136,628 shares owned by Mary Jon Bryan, spouse of Mr. Bryan; (ii) an aggregate of 24,000 shares owned collectively by Adeline James, Eloise James, Josephine James, Bryan James, Ava Leigh Bryan and Gwyneth Bryan, all members of Mr. Bryan's family; (iii) 3,212,455 shares owned by Torch E & P Company (including 664,050 shares issued in the Rig Acquisition); (iv) 181,588 shares personally owned by Mr. Bryan; and (v) vested restricted shares totalling 15,376 shares.

(3)
Prior to the closing of the merger, Mr. Plato was issued 46,129 shares of restricted shares of Resaca common stock, of which 15,376 shares vested on July 17, 2009 and 30,753 shares will vest in full upon the completion of the merger. Once the merger is finalized, Mr. Plato will resign from Resaca's board of directors.

(4)
As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, each such shareholder will be entitled to the number of post-split shares of Resaca common stock reflected in this column plus cash consideration for such shareholder's fractional shares not reflected herein.

IV-25


Table of Contents

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Data

    F-2  
 

Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Balance Sheet

   
F-3
 
 

Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statements of Operations

   
F-4
 
 

Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements

   
F-6
 
 

Pro Forma Combined Supplementary Financial Information for Oil and Gas Producing Activities (Unaudited)

   
F-9
 

Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Subsidiary Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007

   
F-11
 

Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Subsidiary Consolidated Financial Statements for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009

   
F-38
 

Cano Petroleum, Inc. Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007

   
F-59
 

Cano Petroleum, Inc. Consolidated Quarterly Financial Statements for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009

   
F-107
 

F-1


Table of Contents

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL DATA

        The following unaudited pro forma combined financial data is designed to show how the merger of Resaca and Cano might have affected historical financial statements if the merger had been completed at an earlier time and was prepared based on the historical financial results reported by Resaca and Cano. The following should be read in connection with (i) the Resaca restated audited consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009 and the Resaca restated audited consolidated statement of operations for the year ended June 30, 2009; (ii) the Resaca unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2010 and the Resaca unaudited consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended March 31, 2010; (iii) the Cano audited consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009 and the Cano audited consolidated statement of operations for the year ended June 30, 2009; and (iv) the Cano unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2010 and the Cano unaudited consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, all beginning on page F-11 of this proxy statement.

        The following unaudited pro forma combined financial statements were prepared to present the effect of the merger to be accounted for as an acquisition of Cano by Resaca using the "purchase" method of accounting. In addition, Resaca will continue to use the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas properties. The unaudited pro forma combined financial statements give effect to the following transactions:

        The unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet as of March 31, 2010 is based on the unaudited consolidated balance sheet of Resaca and the unaudited consolidated balance sheet of Cano both as of March 31, 2010 included in this proxy statement and gives effect to the transactions listed above as if they had occurred on March 31, 2010 (other than preferred stock outstanding which is as of May 13, 2010).

        The unaudited pro forma combined statement of operations for the year ended June 30, 2009 is based on the restated audited consolidated statement of operations of Resaca and the audited consolidated statement of operations of Cano both for the year ended June 30, 2009 included in this proxy statement and gives effect to the transactions listed above as if they had occurred on July 1, 2008.

        The unaudited pro forma combined statement of operations for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 is based on the unaudited consolidated statement of operations of Resaca and the unaudited consolidated statement of operations of Cano both for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 included in this proxy statement and gives effect to the transactions listed above as if they had occurred on July 1, 2008.

        The unaudited pro forma combined financial statements presented herein are based upon assumptions and include adjustments as explained in the notes to the unaudited pro forma combined financial statements, and the actual recording of the transactions upon closing of the merger could differ. The unaudited pro forma combined financial information is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations or the financial position that would have occurred if the transactions described above had been consummated on the dates indicated, nor is it necessarily indicative of future results of operations or financial position. However, management believes that the assumptions used provide a reasonable basis for presenting the significant effects of the transactions discussed above and that the pro forma adjustments give appropriate effect to those assumptions.

        You should read the unaudited pro forma combined financial data together with the historical financial statements of Resaca and Cano. The unaudited pro forma combined financial statements of Resaca and Cano have been included as required by the rules of the SEC and are provided for comparative purposes only.

F-2


Table of Contents


UNAUDITED PRO FORMA

COMBINED BALANCE SHEET

MARCH 31, 2010

In Thousands, Except Shares and Per Share Amounts
  Resaca Historical Amounts (a)   Cano Historical Amounts   Adjustments for Merger and Reverse Stock Split   Pro Forma
as of March 31,
2010
 

ASSETS

                         

Current assets

                         
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 650   $ 857   $   $ 1,507  
 

Restricted cash

    25             25  
 

Accounts receivable

    2,191     2,533         4,724  
 

Deferred tax assets

    241             241  
 

Derivative assets

        3,486         3,486  
 

Inventory and other current assets

    1,222     1,231         2,453  
                   
   

Total current assets

    4,329     8,107         12,436  
                   

Oil and gas properties

    130,506     292,942     (97,542 )(b)   325,906  

Less accumulated depletion and depreciation

    (12,000 )   (43,434 )   43,434   (b)   (12,000 )
                   

Net oil and gas properties

    118,506     249,508     (54,108 )   313,906  
                   

Fixed assets and other, net

    2,261     2,632         4,893  

Deferred tax asset

            898   (c)   898  

Goodwill

        101     (101 )(d)    
                   

TOTAL ASSETS

  $ 125,096   $ 260,348   $ (53,311 ) $ 332,133  
                   

LIABILITIES, TEMPORARY EQUITY AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

                         

Current liabilities

                         
 

Accounts payable

  $ 1,409   $ 3,830   $ 105   (n) $ 5,344  
 

Accrued liabilities

    1,595     2,364     2,917   (e)   6,876  
 

Due to affiliates, net

    1,756             1,756  
 

Deferred tax liabilities

        898         898  
 

Oil and gas sales payable

    116     730         846  
 

Derivative liabilities

    1,477     227         1,704  
 

Liabilities associated with discontinued operations

        105     (105 )(n)    
 

Current portion of long-term debt

        65,000         65,000  
 

Current portion of asset retirement obligations

        236         236  
                   
   

Total current liabilities

    6,353     73,390     2,917     82,660  

Long-term liabilities

                         
 

Long-term debt

    35,000             35,000  
 

Asset retirement obligations

    4,070     3,043         7,113  
 

Derivative liabilities

    1,579     3,606         5,185  
 

Deferred tax liabilities

    241     17,779     (17,779 )(c)   241  
                   
   

Total liabilities

    47,243     97,818     (14,862 )   130,199  
                   

Temporary equity

                         
 

Series D convertible preferred stock

        26,240     1,885   (f)   28,125  
                   

Commitments and contingencies Stockholders' equity

                         
 

Common stock

    970     5     (5 )(g)   387  

                193   (h)      

                (776 )(l)      
 

Additional paid-in capital

    93,236     190,485     (190,485 )(g)   153,539  

                59,527   (h)      

                776   (l)      
 

Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)

    (16,353 )   (53,503 )   53,503   (g)   19,883  

                36,236   (b)      
 

Treasury stock, at cost

        (697 )   697   (g)    
                   
   

Total stockholders' equity

    77,853     136,290     (40,334 )   173,809  
                   

TOTAL LIABILITIES, TEMPORARY EQUITY AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

  $ 125,096   $ 260,348   $ (53,311 ) $ 332,133  
                   

See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements.

F-3


Table of Contents


UNAUDITED PRO FORMA

COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010

In Thousands, Except Per Share Data
  Resaca
Historical
Amounts(a)
  Cano
Historical
Amounts
  Adjustments
for Merger
and Reverse
Stock Split
  Pro Forma
Nine Months
Ended
March 31,
2010
 

Operating Revenues:

                         
 

Crude oil sales

  $ 10,086   $ 14,045   $ 35 (n) $ 24,166  
 

Natural gas sales

    1,199     2,323     972 (n)   4,494  
                   
   

Total operating revenues

    11,285     16,368     1,007     28,660  
                   

Operating Expenses:

                         
 

Lease operating

    4,590     11,785     178 (n)   16,553  
 

Production and ad valorem taxes

    770     1,365     118 (n)   2,253  
 

General and administrative

    6,246     9,360         15,606  
 

Impairment of long-lived assets

        283         283  
 

Exploration expense

        5,024     (5,024 )(j)    
 

Depletion and depreciation

    2,845     3,627     (730 )(i)   5,742  
 

Accretion of discount on asset retirement obligations

    130     203     2 (n)   335  
                   
   

Total operating expenses

    14,581     31,647     (5,456 )   40,772  
                   

Loss from operations

    (3,296 )   (15,279 )   6,463     (12,112 )

Other expense:

                         
 

Interest expense and other

    (2,442 )   (908 )   (43 )(n)   (3,393 )
 

Loss on derivatives

    (1,004 )   (4,451 )       (5,455 )
                   
   

Total other expense

    (3,446 )   (5,359 )   (43 )   (8,848 )
                   

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes

    (6,742 )   (20,638 )   6,420     (20,960 )

Deferred income tax benefit (expense)

    (2 )   6,803     (2,376 )(k)(n)   4,425  
                   

Loss from continuing operations

    (6,744 )   (13,835 )   4,044     (16,535 )

Income from discontinued operations, net of related taxes

        2,066     (2,066 )(n)    
                   

Net loss

    (6,744 )   (11,769 )   1,978     (16,535 )

Preferred stock dividend

        (1,359 )       (1,359 )
                   

Net loss applicable to common stock

  $ (6,744 ) $ (13,128 ) $ 1,978   $ (17,894 )
                   

Net loss per share

                         
 

Basic and diluted

  $ (0.07 ) $ (0.28 )       $ (0.46 )
                     

Weighted average common shares outstanding

                         
 

Basic and diluted

    96,777     45,570     (45,570 )(g)   38,934  
                     

                19,265 (h)      

                314 (e)      

                (77,422 )(m)      

See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements.

F-4


Table of Contents


UNAUDITED PRO FORMA

COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

For the Year Ended June 30, 2009

In Thousands, Except Per Share Data
  Resaca
Historical
Amounts(a)
  Cano
Historical
Amounts
  Adjustments
for Merger
and Reverse
Stock Split
  Pro Forma Year Ended
June 30,
2009
 

Operating Revenues:

                         
 

Crude oil sales

  $ 12,688   $ 19,222   $ 1,321 (n) $ 33,231  
 

Natural gas sales

    1,879     5,875     1,757 (n)   9,511  
 

Other revenue

        312         312  
                   
     

Total operating revenues

    14,567     25,409     3,078     43,054  
                   

Operating Expenses:

                         
 

Lease operating

    6,623     18,842     638 (n)   26,103  
 

Production and ad valorem taxes

    1,250     2,352     197 (n)   3,799  
 

General and administrative

    7,087     19,156         26,243  
 

Impairment of long-lived assets

        26,670     (30,186 )(j)    
 

                3,516 (n)      
 

Exploration expense

        11,379     (11,379 )(j)    
 

Depletion and depreciation

    3,371     5,720     (891 )(i)   8,200  
 

Accretion of discount on asset retirement obligations

    281     305     3 (n)   589  
 

Inventory writedown

    318             318  
                   
   

Total operating expenses

    18,930     84,424     (38,102 )   65,252  
                   

Loss from operations

    (4,363 )   (59,015 )   41,180     (22,198 )

Other income (expense):

                         
 

Interest expense and other

    (3,981 )   (513 )   (34 )(n)   (4,528 )
 

Impairment of goodwill

        (685 )   685 (j)    
 

Gain on derivatives

    11,055     43,790         54,845  
                   
   

Total other income (expense)

    7,074     42,592     651     50,317  
                   

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

    2,711     (16,423 )   41,831     28,119  

Deferred income tax benefit

        4,712     (15,236 )(k)   (10,524 )
                   

Income (loss) from continuing operations

    2,711     (11,711 )   26,595     17,595  

Income from discontinued operations, net of related taxes

        11,480     (11,480 )(n)    

Preferred stock dividend

        (2,730 )       (2,730 )

Preferred stock repurchased for less than carrying amount

        10,890         10,890  
                   

Net income (loss) applicable to common stock

  $ 2,711   $ 7,929   $ 15,115   $ 25,755  
                   

Net income (loss) per share

                         
 

Basic and diluted

  $ 0.03   $ 0.17         $ 0.68  
                     

Weighted average common shares outstanding

                         
 

Basic

    92,259     45,361     (45,361 )(g)   37,995  
                     

                19,265 (h)      

                278 (e)      

                (73,807 )(m)      
 

Diluted

    92,280     45,361     (45,361 )(g)   37,999  
                     

                19,265 (h)      

                278 (e)      

                (73,824 )(m)      

See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements.

F-5


Table of Contents


NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA

COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(a)
The amounts presented in the Resaca historical balance sheet and statement of operations have been reclassified for consistency with the presentation of the Cano historical amounts. Such presentation will be adopted by the combined company post merger.

(b)
The following table summarizes the consideration paid for Cano by Resaca, and the allocation to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and recognized at the acquisition date.

 

Consideration

       
 

Equity instruments (19,264,518) shares of Resaca common stock per note (h)

  $ 59,720  
         
 

Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed

       
 

Current assets

  $ 8,107  
 

Oil and gas properties

    195,400  
 

Other assets

    3,530  
 

Current liabilities (including current portion of long-term debt)

    (76,307 )
 

Long-term liabilities

    (6,649 )
 

Preferred stock

    (28,125 )
         
 

Total identifiable net assets

    95,956  
         
 

Gain on bargain purchase per note (h)

  $ 36,236  
         

F-6


Table of Contents


NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA

COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(c)
To adjust Cano's historic deferred tax liabilities based primarily on adjustments to the carrying amount of Cano's oil and gas properties as discussed in note (b), and the establishment of a valuation allowance on Cano's NOL carryforwards. We established the valuation allowance on NOL carryforwards based on our estimation of the combined entity's demonstrated ability to utilize such carryforwards to offset future taxable income. The adjustment results in net deferred tax liability of zero attributable to Cano, reflected as a non-current asset of $0.9 million and a current liability of $0.9 million.

(d)
To eliminate Cano's historical goodwill.

(e)
To record severance liabilities for Cano's change of control provisions for two Cano executives to be terminated at the merger closing in 2010. The pro forma adjustment of $2.9 million consists of anticipated cash payments of $1.9 million and the issuance of $1.0 million in common stock. The actual number of shares to be issued will be determined based on Resaca's share price at the transaction closing date. For purposes of pro forma earnings per share, we have computed the number of shares to be issued based on the Resaca stock price of $0.62 per share on May 28, 2010, resulting in the issuance of approximately 0.3 million shares (after consideration of the Reverse Stock Split) pursuant to the change of control provisions.

(f)
To increase the carrying value of the preferred stock to its face value to reflect the current market value of the preferred stock, after giving effect to the amendment to the preferred stock certificate of designation contemplated in the merger agreement.

(g)
To eliminate Cano's historical equity balances and weighted average common shares outstanding.

(h)
To record the issuance of 19,264,518 shares of Resaca common stock, which includes approximately 124,321 shares of Resaca common stock issuable on the exercise of certain Cano stock options, based on Resaca's stock price of $3.10 per share as of May 28, 2010. Both the issuance of common shares and the transaction price were adjusted for the Reverse Stock Split. The stock issuance is valued at $59.7 million, of which $0.2 million is recorded as common stock (par value of $0.01 per share) and $59.5 million is recorded as additional paid-in capital.

F-7


Table of Contents


NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA

COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(i)
As a result of the merger, Cano will adopt the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas properties to conform with the method employed by Resaca. Based on the depletion calculation for the combined entity, depletion expense for the year ended June 30, 2009 and the nine months ended March 31, 2010 would be reduced by $0.9 million and $0.7 million, respectively.

(j)
Based on the combined entity ceiling test and purchase accounting entry discussed in note (b), Cano would not have recognized impairment of long-lived assets of $30.2 million, exploration expense of $11.4 million and impairment of goodwill of $0.7 million during the year ended June 30, 2009 and exploration expenses of $5.0 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010. Therefore, the pro forma adjustments include the reversal of these expense amounts during the year ended June 30, 2009 and the nine months ended March 31, 2010.

(k)
The income tax effect of the expense reductions as discussed in notes (i) and (j), excluding the impairment of goodwill, for the year ended June 30, 2009 and the nine months ended March 31, 2010 is $15.2 million and $2.4 million, respectively. The effective income tax rate used is 37%, based on Resaca's combined federal and state statutory rates. The impairment of goodwill is excluded since it is a permanent difference between book and taxable income.

(l)
To record the effect of the Reverse Stock Split. As of March 31, 2010, Resaca had 96,947,494 shares of its $0.01 par value common shares outstanding. If the Reverse Stock Split had occurred on March 31, 2010, Resaca would have had 19,389,499 shares outstanding, resulting in par value of approximately $193,000. The adjustment represents the difference between Resaca's historical par value of $969,000 and the pro forma par value reflecting the reverse stock split of $193,000.

(m)
To adjust weighted average historical shares outstanding for the Reverse Stock Split, as if such split occurred on July 1, 2008, by dividing Resaca's historical amounts by five.

(n)
Since the combined company will apply the full cost method of accounting, income from discontinued operations is not presented unless substantially all properties in a cost center are disposed. Accordingly, this adjustment reclassifies income from discontinued operations to the respective income statement captions of operating revenues, lease operating expenses, production and ad valorem taxes, depletion and depreciation, accretion of discount on asset retirement obligations and interest expense and other. In addition, the gain on disposition (net of related income taxes) of $12.3 million and $1.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2009 and for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, respectively, is being eliminated as no gain would be recorded under full cost accounting since the credit of proceeds against oil and gas properties would have not materially impacted the amortization rate. Also, the liabilities associated with discontinued operations were reclassified to accounts payable.

F-8


Table of Contents

PRO FORMA COMBINED SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)

        The following tables present certain unaudited pro forma combined information concerning Resaca's and Cano's proved oil and gas reserves at June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2009 and certain pro forma combined information giving effect to the merger as if it had occurred on July 1, 2008. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating the quantities of proved reserves and projecting future rates of production and timing of development expenditures. The following reserve data represent estimates only and reflects prices and costs at June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2009, and should not be construed as being exact.

 
  Resaca
Historical
Amounts
  Cano
Historical
Amounts
  Pro Forma
Amounts
 

Reserves—Crude Oil (MBbls)

                   

Reserves at June 30, 2008

    14,732     39,116     53,848  

Extensions and discoveries

        2,544     2,544  

Sale of minerals in place

        (1,240 )   (1,240 )

Purchases

    221         221  

Revisions of prior estimates

    (2,796 )   (1,338 )   (4,134 )

Production

    (189 )   (311 )   (500 )
               

Reserves at June 30, 2009

    11,968     38,771     50,739  
               

Proved developed reserves at June 30, 2009

   
6,722
   
7,027
   
13,749
 

 

 
  Resaca
Historical
Amounts
  Cano
Historical
Amounts
  Pro Forma
Amounts
 

Reserves—Natural Gas (MMCF)

                   

Reserves at June 30, 2008

    18,941     84,439     103,380  

Extensions and discoveries

        472     472  

Sale of minerals in place

        (7,886 )   (7,886 )

Purchases

    284         284  

Revisions of prior estimates

    (5,639 )   (14,191 )   (19,830 )

Production

    (287 )   (881 )   (1,168 )
               

Reserves at June 30, 2009

    13,299     61,953     75,252  
               

Proved developed reserves at June 30, 2009

   
7,502
   
18,322
   
25,824
 

 

 
  Resaca
Historical
Amounts
  Cano
Historical
Amounts
  Pro Forma
Amounts
 

Standardized Measure of Discounted Cash Flows: ($000s)

                   

Future cash inflows

  $ 861,424   $ 2,751,854   $ 3,613,278  

Future production costs

    (240,966 )   (767,743 )   (1,008,709 )

Future development costs

    (97,151 )   (332,677 )   (429,828 )

Future income taxes

    (154,507 )   (535,300 )   (689,807 )
               

Future net cash flows

    368,800     1,116,134     1,484,934  

10% annual discount

    (232,638 )   (834,122 )   (1,066,760 )
               

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows at June 30, 2009

  $ 136,162   $ 282,012   $ 418,174  
               

F-9


Table of Contents


 
  Resaca
Historical
Amounts
  Cano
Historical
Amounts
  Resaca
Pro Forma
Amounts
 

Changes in Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Cash Flows: ($000s)

                   

Balance at June 30, 2008

  $ 445,776   $ 1,412,543   $ 1,858,319  

Net changes in prices and production costs

    (422,943 )   (1,598,659 )   (2,021,602 )

Net changes in future development costs

    1,582     (36,746 )   (35,164 )

Sales of oil and gas produced, net

    (7,531 )   (6,552 )   (14,083 )

Purchases of reserves

    9,746         9,746  

Sales of reserves

        (94,357 )   (94,357 )

Extensions and discoveries

        38,256     38,256  

Revisions of previous quantity estimates

    (65,786 )   (54,017 )   (119,803 )

Previously estimated development costs incurred

    5,954     47,590     53,544  

Net change in income taxes

    168,297     349,339     517,636  

Accretion of discount

    67,887     224,235     292,122  

Other

    (66,820 )   380     (66,440 )
               

Balance at June 30, 2009

  $ 136,162   $ 282,012   $ 418,174  
               

F-10


Table of Contents

Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Subsidiary Consolidated Financial Statements
for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007

CONTENTS

 
  Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  F-12

Consolidated Financial Statements

   
 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

F-13

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations

 

F-14

 

Consolidated Statements of Owners' Equity (Deficit)

 

F-15

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

F-16

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

F-17

F-11


Table of Contents


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholders
Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Subsidiary
Houston, Texas

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Subsidiary (the "Company") (formerly Resaca Exploitation, L.P.) as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, owners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2009. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

        We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Subsidiary as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

        As described in Note P to the consolidated financial statements, the 2009 financial statements have been restated to correct a mistatement.

/s/ UHY LLP

Houston, Texas
September 29, 2009, except for Note P, as to which the date is April 28, 2010

F-12


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 
  June 30,  
 
  2009
(Restated)
  2008  

Assets

             

Current assets

             
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 330,281   $ 188,457  
 

Restricted cash

    367,184      
 

Accounts receivable

    1,668,007     2,636,359  
 

Prepaids and other current assets

    777,518     3,107,202  
 

Deferred tax assets

    128,553      
           
   

Total current assets

    3,271,543     5,932,018  

Property and Equipment, at cost

             
 

Oil and gas properties—full cost method

    127,079,180     106,964,478  
 

Fixed assets

    89,659     6,975  
           

    127,168,839     106,971,453  
 

Accumulated, depreciation, depletion and amortization

    (9,580,061 )   (6,209,302 )
           

    117,588,778     100,762,151  
 

Other property

    164,083     79,999  
           
   

Total property and equipment

    117,752,861     100,842,150  

Deferred finance costs, net

    975,953     977,254  
           
   

Total assets

  $ 122,000,357   $ 107,751,422  
           

Liabilities and Owners' Equity (Deficit)

             

Current liabilities

             
 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  $ 3,025,786   $ 4,518,313  
 

Due to affiliates, net

    1,023,205     6,567,863  
 

Liabilities from price risk management

    266,572     5,329,135  
 

Current portion of senior credit facility

        18,683,333  
           
   

Total current liabilities

    4,315,563     35,098,644  

Senior credit facility, net of current portion

    31,846,111     62,616,667  

Convertible subordinated debt

        10,000,000  

Deferred tax liability

    128,553      

Liabilities from price risk management

    2,019,697     8,425,495  

Asset retirement obligations

    3,939,246     3,533,577  

Commitments and contingencies

             

Owners' equity (deficit)

    79,751,187     (11,922,961 )
           
   

Total liabilities and owners' equity (deficit)

  $ 122,000,357   $ 107,751,422  
           

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-13


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

 
  Years Ended June 30,  
 
  2009
(Restated)
  2008   2007  

Income

                   
 

Oil and gas revenues

  $ 14,154,035   $ 18,559,474   $ 15,491,419  
 

Unrealized gain (loss) from price risk management activities

    11,468,361     (12,348,851 )   (900,907 )
 

Interest and other income

    51,640            
               
   

Total income

    25,674,036     6,210,623     14,590,512  

Costs and expenses

                   
 

Lease operating expenses

    6,622,739     7,007,477     7,604,154  
 

Production and ad valorem taxes

    1,250,357     1,663,738     1,367,294  
 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

    3,370,759     2,909,577     2,831,521  
 

Accretion expense

    281,290     341,254     294,886  
 

General and administrative expenses

    2,984,286     1,961,655     1,553,003  
 

Share based compensation costs

    4,102,854          
 

Inventory write down

    318,411          
 

Interest expense

    4,024,708     9,829,539     9,348,457  
 

Other expense

    8,206          
               
   

Total costs and expenses

    22,963,610     23,713,240     22,999,315  
               

Income (loss) before taxes

    2,710,426     (17,502,617 )   (8,408,803 )
 

Income tax benefit

             
               

Net income (loss)

  $ 2,710,426   $ (17,502,617 ) $ (8,408,803 )
               

Earnings per share:

                   
 

Basic weighted-average shares outstanding

    92,258,739     n/a     n/a  
 

Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding

    92,279,536     n/a     n/a  
 

Basic earnings per share

  $ 0.03     n/a     n/a  
 

Diluted Earnings per Share

  $ 0.03     n/a     n/a  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-14


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Owners' Equity (Deficit)

Years Ended June 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007

 
  Common Stock    
   
   
   
 
 
  Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated
Deficit
  Total
Stockholders'
Equity
  Partners'
Capital
 
 
  Shares   Par value  

Balance at June 30, 2006

                                $ 13,988,459  

Net loss

                                  (8,408,803 )
                           

Balance at June 30, 2007

                                  5,579,656  

Net loss

                                  (17,502,617 )
                           

Balance at June 30, 2008

                        (11,922,961 )

Conversion from partnership to corporation

    39,625,064     396,251         (12,319,212 )   (11,922,961 )   11,922,961  

Conversion of debt to equity

    20,320,545     203,205     9,796,795         10,000,000      

Initial public offering, net

    32,313,130     323,131     74,537,737         74,860,868      

Share based compensation

            4,102,854         4,102,854      

Net income

                2,710,426     2,710,426      
                           

Balance at June 30, 2009 (Restated)

    92,258,739   $ 922,587   $ 88,437,386   $ (9,608,786 ) $ 79,751,187   $  
                           

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-15


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 
  Years Ended June 30,  
 
  2009
(Restated)
  2008   2007  

Cash flows from operating activities

                   

Net income (loss)

  $ 2,710,426   $ (17,502,617 )   (8,408,803 )

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

                   
 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

    3,370,759     2,909,577     2,831,521  
 

Accretion expense

    281,290     341,254     294,886  
 

Amortization of deferred finance costs

    791,515     273,006     396,407  
 

Unrealized (gain) loss from price risk management activities

    (11,468,361 )   12,348,851     900,907  
 

Share based compensation costs

    4,102,854          
 

Settlement of asset retirement obligations

    (2,389 )        
 

Inventory write down

    318,411          
 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

                   
   

Accounts receivable

    968,352     (872,530 )   (293,736 )
   

Prepaids and other current assets

    2,011,273     (2,583,712 )   (520,429 )
   

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

    (1,492,527 )   963,065     1,691,453  
   

Due to affiliates, net

    (5,544,658 )   5,830,161     310,549  
               
     

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

    (3,953,055 )   1,707,055     (2,797,245 )

Cash flows from investing activities

                   
 

Restricted cash

    (367,184 )        
 

Investment in oil and gas properties

    (19,987,934 )   (4,442,717 )   (13,721,727 )
 

Investment in other property

    (84,084 )   (79,999 )    
 

Investment in fixed assets

    (82,684 )   (3,225 )    
               
     

Net cash used in investing activities

    (20,521,886 )   (4,525,941 )   (13,721,727 )

Cash flows from financing activities

                   
 

Proceeds from senior credit facility

    10,735,000     2,640,000     16,460,000  
 

Payments on senior credit facility

    (60,188,889 )        
 

Proceeds from initial public offering, net of direct expenses

    74,860,868          
 

Deferred finance costs

    (790,214 )   (240,000 )   (260,000 )
               
     

Net cash provided by financing activities

    24,616,765     2,400,000     16,200,000  
               

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

    141,824     (418,886 )   (318,972 )

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

    188,457     607,343     926,315  
               

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

  $ 330,281   $ 188,457     607,343  
               

Supplemental cash flow information

                   
 

Cash paid during the year for interest

  $ 3,233,193   $ 9,556,533   $ 8,952,050  
               
 

Non cash investing and financing activities:

                   
   

Establishment of asset retirement obligations

  $ 126,768   $   $ 4,530  
               
   

Conversion of debt to equity

  $ 10,000,000   $      
               

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-16


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2009 and 2008

Note A—Organization and Nature of Business

        Resaca Exploitation, L.P. (the "Partnership") was formed on March 1, 2006 for the purpose of acquiring and exploiting interests in oil and gas properties located in New Mexico and Texas and to conduct, directly and indirectly through third parties, operations on the properties. The Partnership was funded and began operations on May 1, 2006. Resaca Exploitation, G.P. served as the sole general partner (.667%) and various limited partners owned the remaining 99.333%. Under the terms of the Limited Partnership Agreement, profits and losses were allocated to the general partner and limited partners based upon their ownership percentages.

        On July 10, 2008, the Partnership converted from a Delaware partnership to a Texas corporation and became Resaca Exploitation, Inc. ("Resaca"). Following conversion, the Company became subject to federal and certain state income taxes and adopted a June 30 year end for federal income tax and financial reporting purposes. On July 17, 2008, Resaca Exploitation, Inc. completed an initial public offering (the "Offering") on the Alternative Investment Market of the London Stock Exchange. In the initial public offering, the Company raised $83.4 million before expenses (see Note G).

        Resaca Operating Company ("ROC"), a wholly-owned subsidiary, was formed on October 16, 2008 for the purpose of operating the Company's oil and gas properties. Activities for ROC are consolidated in the Company's financial statements. Resaca and ROC are referred to collectively as "the Company".

Note B—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation

        Principles of Consolidation:    The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Resaca and ROC. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

        Cash and Cash Equivalents:    Cash in excess of the Company's daily requirements is generally invested in short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Such investments are carried at cost, which approximates fair value and, for the purposes of reporting cash flows, are considered to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains its cash in bank deposits with various major financial institutions. These accounts, at times, exceed federally insured limits. Deposits in the United States of America are currently guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. The Company monitors the financial condition of the financial institutions and has not experienced any losses on such accounts.

        Restricted Cash:    The Company collateralizes any open letters of credit with cash (see Note F). At June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company had outstanding open letters of credit collateralized by cash of $367,184 and $0, respectively.

        Accounts Receivable:    Accounts receivable primarily consists of accrued revenues for oil and gas sales. Management believes that all receivables are fully collectible at June 30, 2009. Therefore, no allowance for doubtful accounts was recorded as of June 30, 2009 and 2008.

        Inventory:    Inventory totaling $732,684 and $312,364 at June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, consists of piping and tubulars valued at the lower of cost or market and is included within prepaids and other current assets in the accompanying balance sheets.

        Oil and Gas Properties:    Oil and gas properties are accounted for using the full-cost method of accounting. Under this method, all productive and nonproductive costs incurred in connection with the

F-17


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2009 and 2008

Note B—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation (Continued)


acquisition, exploration, and development of oil and natural gas reserves are capitalized. This includes any internal costs that are directly related to acquisition, exploration and development activities, including salaries and benefits, but does not include any costs related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities. During the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company capitalized $638,942 and $0, respectively in overhead relating to these internal costs.

        No gains or losses are recognized upon the sale or other disposition of oil and natural gas properties except in transactions that would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves.

        Under the full cost method, the net book value of oil and natural gas properties, less related deferred income taxes, may not exceed the estimated after-tax future net revenues from proved oil and natural gas properties, discounted at 10% (the "Ceiling Limitation"). In arriving at estimated future net revenues, estimated lease operating expenses, development costs, and certain production-related and ad valorem taxes are deducted. In calculating future net revenues, prices and costs in effect at the time of the calculation are held constant indefinitely, except for changes that are fixed and determinable by existing contracts. The excess, if any, of the net book value above the Ceiling Limitation is charged to expense in the period in which it occurs and is not subsequently reinstated. The Company prepared its ceiling test at June 30, 2009 and 2008, and no impairment was deemed necessary. Reserve estimates used in determining estimated future net revenues have been prepared by an independent petroleum engineer at year end.

        The costs of unevaluated oil and natural gas properties are excluded from the amortizable base until the time that either proven reserves are found or it has been determined that such properties are impaired. The Company currently has no material capitalized costs related to unevaluated properties. All capitalized costs are included in the amortization base as of June 30, 2009 and 2008.

        Depreciation and Amortization:    All capitalized costs of oil and natural gas properties and equipment, including the estimated future costs to develop proved reserves, are amortized using the unit-of-production method based on total proved reserves. Depreciation of fixed assets is computed on the straight line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, typically three years.

        General and Administrative Expenses:    General and administrative expenses are reported net of recoveries from owners in properties operated by the Company.

        Revenue Recognition:    The Company recognizes oil and gas revenues from its interests in oil and natural gas producing activities as the hydrocarbons are produced and sold.

        Accounting for Price Risk Management Activities:    The Company periodically enters into certain financial derivative contracts utilized for non-trading purposes to hedge the impact of market price fluctuations on its forecasted oil and gas sales. The Company follows the provisions of the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 ("SFAS 133"), Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, for the accounting of its hedge transactions. SFAS 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that all derivative instruments be recorded in the consolidated balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at fair value and requires that the changes in the fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. The Company has certain over-the-counter collar contracts to hedge the cash flow of the forecasted sale of

F-18


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2009 and 2008

Note B—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation (Continued)


oil and gas sales. The Company did not elect to document and designate these contracts as hedges. Thus, the changes in the fair value of these over-the-counter collars are reflected in earnings for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007.

        Income Tax:    The Company is subject to federal income tax, Texas state margin tax, and New Mexico state income tax. The Company follows the guidance in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires the use of the asset and liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes and provides deferred income taxes for all significant temporary differences.

        The Company follows Financial Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB No. 109. The Interpretation prescribes guidance for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. To recognize a tax position, the enterprise determines whether it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation, based solely on the technical merits of the position. A tax position that meets the more likely than not threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to be recognized in the financial statements. The amount of tax benefit recognized with respect to any tax position is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement.

        Deferred Finance Costs:    The Company capitalizes all costs directly related to obtaining financing and such costs are amortized to interest expense over the life of the related facility. During the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company incurred and capitalized finance costs of $790,214 and $240,000, respectively. At June 30, 2009 and 2008, the deferred finance costs balance is presented net of accumulated amortization of $1,526,261 and $734,746, respectively.

        Use of Estimates:    Management of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

        Independent petroleum and geological engineers have prepared estimates of the Company's oil and natural gas reserves at June 30, 2009 and 2008. Proved reserves, estimated future net revenues and the present value of our reserves are estimated based upon a combination of historical data and estimates of future activity. We have based our present value of proved reserves on spot prices on the date of the estimate. The reserve estimates are used in calculating depreciation, depletion and amortization and in the assessment of the Company's ceiling limitation. Significant assumptions are required in the valuation of proved oil and natural gas reserves which, as described herein, may affect the amount at which oil and natural gas properties are recorded. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

        Asset Retirement Obligations:    The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143 ("SFAS 143"), Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. SFAS 143 requires that an asset retirement obligation ("ARO") associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset be recognized as a liability in the period in which a legal obligation is incurred and becomes determinable, with an offsetting increase in the carrying amount of the associated asset. The cost of the tangible

F-19


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2009 and 2008

Note B—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation (Continued)


asset, including the initially recognized ARO, is depreciated such that the cost of the ARO is recognized over the useful life of the asset. The ARO is recorded at fair value, and accretion expense will be recognized over time as the discounted liability is accreted to its expected settlement value. The fair value of the ARO is measured using expected future cash outflows discounted at the company's credit-adjusted risk-free interest rate.

        Inherent in the fair value calculation of ARO are numerous assumptions and judgments, including the ultimate settlement amounts, inflation factors, credit adjusted discount rates, timing of settlement, and changes in the legal, regulatory, environmental and political environments. To the extent future revisions to these assumptions impact the fair value of the existing ARO liability, a corresponding adjustment is made to the oil and gas property balance.

        The following table is a reconciliation of the asset retirement obligation:

 
  Years Ended June 30,  
 
  2009   2008  

Asset retirement obligation, beginning of the period

  $ 3,533,577   $ 3,192,323  

Liabilities incurred

    13,193      

Liabilities settled

    (2,389 )    

Accretion expense

    281,290     341,254  

Revisions in estimated liabilities

    113,575      
           

Asset retirement obligation, end of the period

  $ 3,939,246   $ 3,533,577  
           

        Share-Based Compensation:    The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R) ("SFAS 123(R)"), Share-Based Payment, for all equity awards granted to employees. SFAS 123(R) requires all companies to expense the fair value of employee stock options and other forms of share-based compensation over the requisite service period. The Company's share-based awards consist of stock options and restricted stock.

        Earnings per Share:    Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the sum of the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period and the dilutive effect of restricted stock awards and the assumed exercise of stock options using the treasury stock method. Earnings per share information is only presented for the year ended June 30, 2009 as the Company was organized as a partnership during the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.

Accounting Principles Not Yet Adopted

        SFAS 141(R):    In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("the FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141(R), Business Combinations ("SFAS 141(R)". Under SFAS 141(R), an entity is required to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, contractual contingencies, and contingent consideration at their fair value on the acquisition date. It further requires that acquisition-related costs be recognized separately from the acquisition and expensed as incurred. While SFAS 141(R) is effective for business combinations consummated in fiscal

F-20


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2009 and 2008

Note B—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation (Continued)

years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, any deal costs incurred during the current fiscal year have been expensed at June 30, 2009. The Company adopted SFAS 141(R) effective July 1, 2009.

        SFAS 160:    In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51 ("SFAS No. 160"). SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. It also establishes a single method of accounting for changes in a parent's ownership interest in a subsidiary and requires expanded disclosures. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. We adopted SFAS No. 160 on July 1, 2009 and this standard will have an impact on the accounting for any acquisition of non controlling interests after that date.

        SFAS 161:    In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 ("SFAS 161"). SFAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for, and how such derivative instruments affect an entity's financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company adopted this standard on July 1, 2009 and does not expect SFAS 161 to have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or related disclosures.

        SFAS 168:    In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 168, Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("SFAS 168"). SFAS 168 replaces SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principle. SFAS 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the sole source of the authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by all nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally acceptable accounting principles. SFAS 168 is effective for financial statements for interim and annual periods ending on or after September 15, 2009. We adopted SFAS 168 on July 1, 2009. We do not expect the adoption of this statement to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        EITF 03-6-1    In June 2008, the FASB issued EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities ("FSP 03-6-1"). FSP 03-6-1 addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and need to be included in the calculation of earnings per share under the two-class method described in SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share. Under FSP 03-6-1, share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are "participating securities" as defined by EITF 03-6, Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128, and therefore should be included in computing earnings per share using the two-class method, FSP 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008. We adopted FSP 03-6-1 on July 1, 2009. We do not expect the adoption of FSP 03-6-1 to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations of cash flows.

        MODERNIZATION OF OIL AND GAS REPORTING:    In December 2008, the SEC issued the final rule, "Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting," which adopts revisions to the SEC's oil and

F-21


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2009 and 2008

Note B—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation (Continued)


natural gas reporting disclosure requirements and is effective for annual reports on Forms 10-K for years ending on or after December 31, 2009. Early adoption of the new rules is prohibited. The new rules are intended to provide investors with a more meaningful and comprehensive understanding of oil and natural gas reserves to help investors evaluate their investments in oil and natural gas companies. The new rules are also designed to modernize the oil and natural gas disclosure requirements to align them with current practices and changes in technology. The new rules include changes to the pricing used to estimate reserves, the ability to include nontraditional resources in reserves, the use of new technology for determining reserves and permitting disclosure of probable and possible reserves. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of these rules. The SEC is discussing the rules with the FASB staff to align FASB accounting standards with the new SEC rules. These discussions may delay the required compliance date. Absent any change in the effective date, the Company will begin complying with the disclosure requirements in our annual report for the year ending June 30, 2010.

Newly Adopted Accounting Principles

        SFAS 157:    In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements ("SFAS 157"). SFAS 157 applies to all financial assets and financial liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements. SFAS 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements for financial assets and liabilities, as well as for any other assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value on a recurring basis in financial statements. SFAS 157 was effective for the Company July 1, 2008 and, therefore, the Company adopted SFAS 157 effective on that date. The adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows (See Note I).

        SFAS 165:    In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 165, Subsequent Events ("SFAS 165") to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date, but prior to the issuance of financial statements. Specifically, SFAS 165 sets forth: (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; (2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and (3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. SFAS 165 is effective for financial statements issued for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted SFAS 165 on June 30, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Note C—Related Party Transactions

        The Company receives support services from Torch Energy Advisors Incorporated ("TEAI") and its subsidiaries, which include office administration, risk management, corporate secretary, legal services, corporate and litigation legal services, graphic services, tax department services, financial planning and analysis, information management, financial reporting and accounting services, and engineering and technical services. The Company paid TEAI and a subsidiary of TEAI $1,998,916, $2,067,659, and $1,859,892 during the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 respectively, for such services. The majority of such fees are included in general and administrative expenses.

F-22


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2009 and 2008

Note C—Related Party Transactions (Continued)

        In the ordinary course of business, the Company incurs payable balances with TEAI resulting from the payment of costs and expenses of the Company and from the payment of support services fees. Such amounts are settled on a regular basis, generally monthly.

Note D—Notes Payable

        On May 1, 2006, the Company entered into an $85 million Senior Secured Loan Facility (the "Facility") with third parties. The Facility included two tranches, A and B, of differing amounts and terms. The maximum credit amount under Tranche A was $70 million, $50 million of which was funded at closing. At June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $0 million and $66.3 million, under Tranche A and $0 and $15 million under Tranch B, respectively. The Tranche B maximum credit amount was $15 million. The full amount was funded at closing and no additional borrowings were permitted. Prior to the July 2008 amendment (discussed below), interest accrued on the indebtedness at the one month LIBOR plus 6% (8.5% at June 30, 2008) for Tranche A and interest accrued at the one month LIBOR plus 9% (11.5% at June 30, 2008) for Tranche B. Interest payments were due monthly. Scheduled principal payments under Tranche A began on May 1, 2009 and were scheduled to occur monthly, in even increments. Tranche A was to mature on May 1, 2012. On June 11, 2008, the credit agreement was amended to extend the maturity of Tranche B to August 31, 2008. The Facility contains, among other terms, provisions for the maintenance of certain financial ratios and restrictions on additional debt. On June 26, 2009, the outstanding balance of the Facility was refinanced as described below.

        In July 2008, with the proceeds received from the Offering, the Company paid the $15 million outstanding balance on Tranche B which extinguished that portion of the Facility and also repaid $44.3 million of the $66.3 million outstanding on Tranche A. In conjunction with the partial repayment of Tranche A, the maximum credit amount under Tranche A was lowered to $60 million, a 4% LIBOR floor was added, and certain financial covenants were modified. The interest rate on outstanding borrowings under the facility was 10% at December 31, 2008. Recourse for the Facility is limited to the Company, as borrower, and the note is secured by all of Company's oil and gas properties.

        On May 1, 2006, the Company entered into a $10 million Senior Subordinated Secured Convertible Term Loan Facility ("Convertible Debt") with third parties. The aggregate loan amount under the Convertible Debt was $10 million, all of which was funded at closing. Interest was paid quarterly on the Convertible Debt, at a rate of 6% per annum for cash dividends and 8% per annum in the event the Company chose to pay interest in kind ("PIK"). The lenders could convert their loans, in whole or in part, to ownership interests in the Company at any time at an 18% premium, provided that the minimum conversion loan amount is $500,000. PIK interest was also able to be converted to ownership interests. The Company had the right to redeem the subordinated debt after May 1, 2009, but was required to pay an early redemption premium. Early redemption premium amounts varied in years three, four and five and were designed to ensure the lenders different internal rates of return at those points in time. To the extent the Convertible Debt was neither redeemed by the Company nor converted by the lenders, the full principal amount was to be due on May 1, 2012. The Convertible Debt contained, among other terms, provisions for the maintenance of certain financial ratios and restrictions on additional debt. As of June 30, 2008, the Company was compliant with all of the covenants, as amended, or had obtained a waiver for noncompliance. Recourse for the Convertible Debt was limited to the Company, as borrower, and the note was secured by all of the Company's oil

F-23


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2009 and 2008

Note D—Notes Payable (Continued)


and gas properties. In July 2008, holders of the Convertible Debt converted their notes into stock of the Company.

        On June 26, 2009, the Company entered into a $50 million, three-year Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility ("CIT Facility") with CIT Capital USA Inc. ("CIT") that matures on July 1, 2012. The CIT Facility replaced the Facility entered into in 2006 which had converted to a term loan in May 2009 as described above. The initial borrowing base of the CIT Facility is $35 million and CIT serves as administrative agent. Interest on the CIT Facility is set at LIBOR plus 5.5% subject to a 2.5% LIBOR floor. Recourse for the CIT Facility was limited to the Company, as borrower and the note secured by all of the Company's oil and gas properties. At June 30, 2009, the interest rate in place was 8.0%. As a result of this transaction, the Company entered into additional natural gas hedges for January 2011 through June 2012 and additional oil hedges for June 2011 through June 2012. Additionally, the Company wrote off $536,579 in deferred financing costs associated with the Facility entered into in 2006. The CIT Facility contains, among other terms, provisions for the maintenance of certain financial ratios and restrictions on additional debt. As of June 30, 2009, the Company was compliant with all of the covenants.

        Scheduled maturities as of June 30, 2009 are as follows:

Year Ending June 30,
   
 

2010

  $  

2011

     

2012

     

2013

    31,846,111  
       

  $ 31,846,111  
       

Note E—Price Risk Management and Financial Instruments

        The Company enters into option contracts for the purpose of hedging the impact of market fluctuations on oil and natural gas production. At June 30, 2009, the Company was party to energy commodity derivative contracts extending to June 2012. During the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the average monthly hedged volume of crude oil was 12,000 barrels and 13,500 barrels, respectively. During the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the average monthly hedged volumes of natural gas were 20,000 MMbtus. During the period from July 2009 to June 2012, the monthly hedged volumes of oil ranged from 11,000 barrels to 6,000 barrels. During the period from July 2009 to June 2012, the monthly hedged volumes of natural gas ranged from 20,000 MMbtus to 7,500 MMbtus.

        While notional amounts are used to express the volume of puts and over-the-counter options, the amounts potentially subject to credit risk, in the event of nonperformance by the third parties, are substantially smaller. The Company does not anticipate any material impact to its financial position or results of operations as a result of nonperformance by third parties on financial instruments related to its option contracts.

        The carrying amounts of the Company's cash and cash equivalents, receivables and payables approximate the fair value at June 30, 2009 and 2008 because of their short-term maturities. The carrying amounts of the Company's debt instruments at June 30, 2009 and 2008 approximate their fair values due to the interest rates being at market.

F-24


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2009 and 2008

Note F—Commitments and Contingencies

        The Company, from time to time, is involved in certain litigation arising out of the normal course of business, none currently outstanding of which, in the opinion of management, will have any material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company as a whole.

        The Company has open letters of credit of approximately $367,184 at June 30, 2009 which are fully collateralized by restricted cash balances.

Note G—Initial Public Offering

        On July 17, 2008, the Company completed an initial public offering on the Alternative Investment Market of the London Stock Exchange. In the initial public offering, the Company raised $83.4 million before expenses. Proceeds received were used to repay outstanding borrowings on the Facility, extinguish the balance outstanding to its affiliates, and purchase an overriding royalty interest from a third party covering all of its existing oil and gas properties for $7 million. In conjunction with the initial public offering, certain officers and directors were granted restricted stock awards for an aggregate 4.1 million shares of our common stock that vest ratably over three years, and, 1.7 million stock options, each option to purchase one share of our common stock at an exercise price of 1.34 British pounds per share. The options vest ratably over three years and will expire on July 17, 2016.

Note H—Share-Based Compensation

        The Company has adopted a Share Incentive Plan ("The Plan") to foster and promote the long-term financial success of the Company and to increase shareholder value by attracting, motivating and retaining key personnel. The Plan is considered an important component of total compensation offered to key employees and outside directors. The Plan consists of stock option and restricted stock awards. The Company expenses the fair-value of the share-based payments over the requisite service period of the awards. At June 30, 2009, there was $8,744,330 in unrecognized compensation expense to be recognized over the next 2.56 years. The stock options and restricted stock both vest over a 3 year period. At June 30, 2009 there were 1,756,787 stock options and 4,105,515 shares of restricted stock outstanding. Additionally, the Board of Directors has the ability to authorize the issuance of another combined 3,363,572 shares in stock options and restricted stock to key personnel.

        The following summary represents restricted stock awards outstanding at June 30, 2009:

 
  Shares   Grant Date
Fair Value
 

Awards outstanding at June 30, 2008

         

Restricted Shares granted

    4,105,515   $ 11,018,184  

Restricted Shares sold or forfeited

         
           

Awards outstanding at June 30, 2009

    4,105,515   $ 11,018,184  
           

F-25


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2009 and 2008

Note H—Share-Based Compensation (Continued)

        For stock options, the Company determines the fair value of each stock option at the grant date using a Black-Scholes model, with the following assumptions used for the grants made on July 17, 2008 and January 21, 2009:

Risk-free interest rate

    3.35 %

Volatility factor

    50 %

Expected dividend yield percentage

    0 %

Weighted average expected life

    3.5   years

        All stock option awards have a 3 year vesting period and expire 5 years after the vesting date. A summary of stock options awarded during the 12 months ended June 30, 2009 is as follows:

 
  Shares   Average
Exercise Price
  Grant Date
Fair Value
 

Options outstanding at June 30, 2008

               

Shares awarded

    1,756,787   $ 2.10   $ 1,829,000  

Shares exercised or forfeited

               

Options outstanding at June 30, 2009

    1,756,787   $ 2.10   $ 1,829,000  

        A summary of stock options outstanding at June 30, 2009 is as follows:

Grant Date
  Exercise Price   Converted
Exercise Price*
  Option Awards
Outstanding
  Remaining
Option Life
  Option Awards
Exercisable
 

07/17/08

    £1.30   $ 2.15     1,706,787     7.05      

01/21/09

    £0.23     0.38     50,000     7.56      
                         

        $ 2.10     1,756,787     7.06      

*
Exercise prices are denominated in British pounds and have been converted at a rate of $1.652 USD/GBP.

Note I—Fair Value Measurements

        SFAS 157 requires enhanced disclosures regarding the assets and liabilities carried at fair value. The pronouncement establishes a fair value hierarchy such that "Level 1" measurements include unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market, "Level 2" measurements include quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market which have been adjusted for items such as effects of restrictions for transferability and those that are not quoted but observable through corroboration with observable market data, including quoted market prices for similar assets, and "Level 3" measurements include those that are unobservable and of a highly subjective measure.

        The Company utilizes the market approach for recurring fair value measurements of its oil and gas hedges. The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Company's financial assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009. As

F-26


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2009 and 2008

Note I—Fair Value Measurements (Continued)


required by SFAS 157, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement:

 
  Market Prices
for Identical
Items (Level 1)
  Significant Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
  Total  

Assets:

                         
 

Oil and Gas Hedges

      $       $  
                   

Total Assets

                 
                   

Liabilities:

                         
 

Oil and Gas Hedges

        2,286,269         2,286,269  
                   

Total Liabilities

        2,286,269         2,286,269  
                   

Total Net Liabilities

      $ 2,286,269       $ 2,286,269  
                   

Note J—Income Taxes

        The Company's income tax expense is composed of the following:

 
  Year Ended
June 30, 2009
 

Current income tax benefit

       
 

Federal

  $  
 

State

     
       
   

Total current tax benefit

     

Deferred income tax benefit

       
 

Federal

     
 

State

     
       
   

Total deferred tax benefit

     
       

Total income tax benefit

  $  
       

F-27


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2009 and 2008

Note J—Income Taxes (Continued)

        Significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities at June 30, 2009 are as follows:

 
  As of
June 30, 2009
 

Current

       

Deferred tax assets:

       
 

Unrealized loss on commodity derivatives

  $ 98,632  
 

Inventory impairment

    117,812  
       
 

Total current deferred tax asset (liability)

    216,444  
 

Less: Valuation allowance

    (87,891 )
       

Net current deferred tax asset (liability)

  $ 128,553  
       

Long-Term

       

Deferred tax assets:

       
 

Deferred Compensation Expense

  $ 1,518,055  
 

Net operating loss carryovers

    5,774,952  
 

Unrealized loss on commodity derivatives

    747,288  
 

Amortization of loan costs

    198,534  
       
 

Total long-term deferred tax assets

    8,238,829  
 

Less: Valuation allowance

    (3,345,543 )
       
 

Net long-term deferred tax assets

    4,893,286  

Deferred tax liabilities:

       
 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

    (5,021,839 )
       
 

Total long-term deferred tax liabilities

    (5,021,839 )
       

Net long-term deferred tax asset (liability)

  $ (128,553 )
       

        The following reconciles our income tax expense to the amount calculated at the statutory federal income tax rate:

 
  Year ended June 30, 2009  

Income tax expense at statutory rate

  $ 948,649  

State taxes, less federal benefit

    52,868  

Deferred tax benefit recorded upon conversion to corporation

    (4,411,495 )

Income attributable to period as a partnership

    (26,204 )

Valuation allowance

    3,433,434  

Permanent and other

    2,748  
       
 

Income tax expense

  $  
       

        At June 30, 2009, the Company has a net operating loss ("NOL") carryforward for federal income tax purposes of approximately $15.6 million. The NOL will expire on June 30, 2029.

        The Company and its subsidiaries file federal income tax returns with the United States Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") and state income tax returns in Texas and New Mexico. The Company's tax

F-28


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2009 and 2008

Note J—Income Taxes (Continued)


returns are subject to examination by appropriate taxing authorities, however, none are under examination at this time.

        A valuation allowance has been established with respect to the excess of the Company's deferred tax assets over its deferred tax liabilities at June 30, 2009 because such net deferred tax asset does not meet the deferred tax asset realization criteria set forth in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize a benefit of this net deferred tax asset in future periods.

        The Company adopted FIN 48 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2009 as described in Note B. The adoption did not have an impact on the financial statements of the Company as there are no uncertain income tax positions required to be recorded pursuant to FIN 48. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. (federal and state jurisdictions). Tax years 2006 to 2008 remain open for all jurisdictions. However, for the 2006 tax year, the 2007 tax year, and the tax period from January 1, 2008 to July 10, 2008, the Company was a partnership for federal and New Mexico income tax purposes. Therefore, for those tax periods, any adjustments to the Company's taxable income would flow through to Resaca's partners in those jurisdictions. The Company's accounting policy is to recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. The Company does not have an accrued liability for interest and penalties at June 30, 2009.

        There were no changes in unrecognized tax benefits during the 12 months ended June 30, 2009. All tax benefits recognized relate to tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductions.

Note K—Stockholders' Equity

        As described in Note A, the Company converted from a partnership to a corporation on July 10, 2008. As such, partners' capital was converted to stockholders' equity. At June 30, 2009, stockholders' equity was composed of the following:

Common Stock ($.01 par value)

  $ 922,587  

Additional Paid-in Capital

    88,437,386  

Accumulated Deficit

    (9,608,786 )
       

Total Stockholders' Equity

  $ 79,751,187  
       

        At June 30, 2009, the Company had 230,000,000 common shares authorized and 92,258,739 shares issued and outstanding.

Note L—Employee Benefit Plans

        Under the Resaca Exploitation, Inc 401(k) Plan (the "Plan") established in fiscal year 2009, contributions are made to the Plan by qualified employees at their election and our matching contributions to the Plan are made at specified rates. Our contribution to the Plan in fiscal year 2009 was $16,043.

F-29


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2009 and 2008

Note M—Liquidity

        As of June 30, 2009, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $9,608,786 and a working capital deficit of $1,044,020. Management believes that borrowings currently available to the Company under the Company's CIT Facility ($3,153,889 at June 30, 2009) and anticipated cash flows from operations will be sufficient to satisfy its currently expected capital expenditures and working capital obligations through fiscal year 2010.

Note N—Subsequent Events

        The Company evaluates events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued. The Company evaluated such events and transactions through April 28, 2010 when the restated financial statements were available to be issued.

        On July 1, 2009, the Company acquired certain workover rigs, reversing units and related assets from Permian Basin Well Services, LLC ("PBWS") in exchange for 3,320,250 newly issued shares of the Company's common stock, valued at $1,594,000. PBWS is a wholly-owned subsidiary of TEAI.

        On September 29, 2009, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") by and among the Company and Cano Petroleum, Inc. ("Cano"). Cano will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company following the merger. Upon consummation of the merger, each share of Cano common stock will be converted into the right to receive 2.1 shares of common stock of the Company, or 0.42 as adjusted for the proposed reverse split of one new common share for each five common shares currently held by Company shareholders. Each share of Cano Series D Convertible Preferred Stock ("Preferred Stock") will be converted into the right to receive one share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company. Based on the closing price of the company common stock on April 26, 2010, the shares to be issued in respect of Cano's common stock would be valued at approximately $64 million. Consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement is conditioned upon, among other things, (1) approval by Cano holders of the common stock and preferred stock, (2) approval of the holders of the common stock of the Company, (3) the listing of the Company common stock on the NYSE Amex, (4) the refinancing of existing bank debt of the Company and Cano, (5) the receipt of required regulatory approvals and (6) the effectiveness of a registration statement relating to the shares of the Company common stock to be issued in the merger. The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for both Cano and the Company, including the right to terminate the Merger Agreement to enter into a Superior Proposal (as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement). In the event of a termination of the Merger Agreement under certain specified circumstances described in the Merger Agreement, one party will be required to pay the other party a termination fee of $3,500,000. On October 23, 2009, the Company filed a Form S-4 with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and subsequently filed numerous amended Forms S-4. Once approved by the SEC, the Form S-4 will serve as a prospectus for Company shareholders as well as a joint proxy statement for both Company shareholders and Cano stockholders to vote on the proposed merger of the two companies, in addition to other matters to be voted on as discussed therein. One such matter to be voted upon by Company shareholders is a five for one reverse split of its common shares. The reverse split is being undertaken to achieve a minimum stock price listing requirement of the NYSE Amex of $2.00 per share. At April 26, 2010, the price of each Company common share was $0.70 per share.

F-30


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2009 and 2008

Note O—Supplementary Financial Information for Oil and Gas Producing Activities (unaudited)

Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Property Acquisition, Exploration, and Development Activities

 
  Years ended June 30,  
 
  2009   2008   2007  

Acquisition of proved properties

  $ 7,000,000          

Acquisition of unproved properties

             

Development costs

    12,987,934     4,442,717     13,721,727  

Exploration costs

             
               

Total costs incurred

  $ 19,987,934   $ 4,442,717   $ 13,721,727  

Oil and Gas Reserve Information

        The estimate of reserves disclosed in this report were obtained from an independent reserve report received from Haas Petroleum Engineering Services, Inc. The tests and procedures used within the independent reserve report were prepared using standard engineering practices generally accepted by the petroleum industry and conform to guidelines developed and adopted by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").

        Proved reserves are the estimated quantities that geologic and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed reserves are the quantities expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Due to the inherent uncertainties and the limited nature of reservoir data, such estimates are subject to change as additional information becomes available. The reserves actually recovered and the timing of production of these reserves may be substantially different from the original estimate. Revisions result primarily from new information obtained from development drilling and production history, acquisitions of crude oil and natural gas properties and changes in economic factors.

        The term proved reserves is defined by the SEC in Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X adopted under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In general, proved reserves are the estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids that geological or engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions, i.e., prices and costs as of the date the estimate is made. Prices include consideration of changes in existing prices provided only by contractual arrangements, but not on escalations based on future conditions.

F-31


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2009 and 2008

Note O—Supplementary Financial Information for Oil and Gas Producing Activities (unaudited) (Continued)

        The following reserves data only represent estimates and should not be construed as being exact.

Proved Reserves
  Oil (bbl)   Natural
Gas (mcf)
  Total Reserves
BOE
 

June 30, 2006(1)

    17,644,724     17,167,135     20,505,913  

Revision of prior estimates

    (2,915,402 )   1,636,954     (2,642,576 )

Extensions, discoveries and other additions

             

Production

    (217,992 )   (326,729 )   (272,447 )

Improved recovery

             

Purchases

             

Sales

             
               

June 30, 2007

    14,511,330     18,477,360     17,590,890  

Revision of prior estimates

    432,254     784,432     562,993  

Extensions, discoveries and other additions

             

Improved recovery

             

Production

    (212,004 )   (320,952 )   (265,496 )

Purchases

             

Sales

             
               

June 30, 2008

    14,731,580     18,940,840     17,888,387  

Revision of prior estimates

    (2,795,448 )   (5,639,312 )   (3,735,333 )

Extensions, discoveries and other additions

             

Improved recovery

             

Production

    (189,276 )   (286,790 )   (237,074 )

Purchases

    220,974     284,113     268,326  

Sales

             
               

June 30, 2009

    11,967,830     13,298,851     14,184,306  

Proved developed reserves, June 30, 2007

    9,075,400     12,406,330     11,143,122  

Proved developed reserves, June 30, 2008

    9,211,610     12,825,430     11,349,182  

Proved developed reserves, June 30, 2009

    6,722,220     7,501,841     7,972,527  

(1)
June 30, 2006 reserve estimates were prepared internally based on the January 1, 2007 third party reserve report upon Resaca changing its fiscal year end.

Resaca Reserve Explanation:

        For the reserves at June 30, 2007, the net reduction of 2,643 MBOE for revisions of prior estimates was comprised of:

F-32


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2009 and 2008

Note O—Supplementary Financial Information for Oil and Gas Producing Activities (unaudited) (Continued)

        For the reserves at June 30, 2009, the reduction for revisions of prior estimates pertain to reductions in estimated recoverable PDNP reserves at our Cooper Jal Complex Unit of 1,274 MBOE and other revisions of 2,461 MBOE related to the decline of commodity prices and forecast changes which reduce the economic life of our assets, as compared to proved reserves as of June 30, 2009. The specific field changes are as follows:

Future Net Cash Flows

        The following table sets forth unaudited information concerning future net cash flows for oil and gas reserves, net of income tax expense. Income tax expense has been computed using expected future tax rates and giving effect to tax deductions and credits available, under current laws, and which relate to oil and gas producing activities.

 
  2009   2008   2007  

Future cash inflows

  $ 861,425,080   $ 2,241,462,860   $ 1,052,025,510  

Future production costs

    240,965,980     439,477,990     251,493,350  

Future development costs

    97,151,200     115,869,740     100,983,590  

Future income tax expenses

    154,507,384     578,932,022     218,835,228  

Future net cash flows

    368,800,516     1,107,183,108     480,713,342  

10% annual discount for estimating timing of cash flows

    232,638,214     661,406,827     294,245,784  

Standarized measure of discounted future net cash flows

  $ 136,162,302   $ 445,776,281   $ 186,467,558  

F-33


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2009 and 2008

Note O—Supplementary Financial Information for Oil and Gas Producing Activities (unaudited) (Continued)

Changes in Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows

 
  2009   2008   2007  

Balance, beginning of year

  $ 445,776,281   $ 186,467,558   $ 192,116,360  

Net changes in prices and production costs

    (422,942,878 )   371,126,029     52,306,417  

Net changes in future development costs

    1,582,866     (10,217,019 )   (9,444,866 )

Sales of oil and gas produced, net

    (7,531,296 )   (11,551,997 )   (7,887,265 )

Purchases of reserves

    9,746,378          

Sales of reserves

             

Extensions and discoveries

             

Revisions of previous quantity estimates

    (65,785,772 )   21,998,842     (49,441,138 )

Previously estimated development costs incurred

    5,953,630     4,442,717     13,721,727  

Net change in income taxes

    168,296,809     (143,294,423 )   (5,624,615 )

Accretion of discount

    67,886,705     27,135,322     27,891,407  

Timing differences and other

    (66,820,421 )   (330,748 )   (27,170,469 )

Balance, end of year

  $ 136,162,302   $ 445,776,281   $ 186,467,558  

Note P—Restatement

        During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company recognized the benefit of its deferred tax assets in excess of its deferred tax liabilities. Management has subsequently determined that it should have provided a full valuation allowance on its net deferred tax assets from the date of the conversion from a partnership to a corporation as it is not more likely than not that such net deferred tax asset will be realized in the future. Accordingly, the financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2009 have been restated to limit the recognition of the Company's deferred tax assets to the amount of its deferred tax liabilities.

        The restatement discussed above had the following effects on the consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows as of and for the year ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the amounts previously reported. The restatements also had effects on amounts and disclosure in Notes J, K, and M.

F-34


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2009 and 2008

Note P—Restatement (Continued)

Balance Sheet

 
  As Previously
Reported
  As
Restated
  Effect of
Change
 

Assets

                   

Current assets

                   
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 330,281   $ 330,281   $  
 

Restricted cash

    367,184     367,184      
 

Accounts receivable

    1,668,007     1,668,007      
 

Prepaids and other current assets

    777,518     777,518      
 

Deferred tax assets

    216,444     128,553     (87,891 )
               
   

Total current asstets

    3,359,434     3,271,543     (87,891 )

Property and Equipment, at cost

                   
 

Oil and gas properties—full cost method

    127,079,180     127,079,180      
 

Fixed assets

    89,659     89,659      
               

    127,168,839     127,168,839      
 

Accumulated, depreciation, depletion and amortization

    (9,580,061 )   (9,580,061 )    
               

    117,588,778     117,588,778      
 

Other property

    164,083     164,083      
               
   

Total property and equipment

    117,752,861     117,752,861      

Deferred tax asset

    3,216,990         (3,216,990 )

Deferred finance costs, net

    975,953     975,953      
               
   

Total assets

  $ 125,305,238   $ 122,000,357   $ (3,304,881 )
               

Liabilities and Owners' Equity (Deficit)

                   

Current liabilities

                   
 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  $ 3,025,786   $ 3,025,786   $  
 

Due to affiliates, net

    1,023,205     1,023,205      
 

Liabilities from price risk management

    266,572     266,572      
 

Current portion of senior credit facility

             
               
   

Total current liabilities

    4,315,563     4,315,563      

Senior credit facility, net of current portion

    31,846,111     31,846,111      

Convertible subordinated debt

             

Deferred tax liability

        128,553     128,553  

Liabilities from price risk management

    2,019,697     2,019,697      

Assest retirement obligations

    3,939,246     3,939,246      

Commitments and contingencies

                   

Owners' equity (deficit)

    83,184,621     79,751,187     (3,433,434 )
               
   

Total liabilities and owners' equity (deficit)

  $ 125,305,238   $ 122,000,357   $ (3,304,881 )
               

F-35


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2009 and 2008

Note P—Restatement (Continued)

Consolidated Statement of Operations

 
  As Previously
Reported
  As
Restated
  Effect of
Change
 

Income

                   
 

Oil and gas revenues

  $ 14,154,035   $ 14,154,035      
 

Unrealized gain (loss) from price risk management activities

    11,468,361     11,468,361      
 

Interest and other income

    51,640     51,640      
               
   

Total income

    25,674,036     25,674,036      

Costs and expenses

                   
 

Lease operating expenses

    6,622,739     6,622,739      
 

Production and ad valorem taxes

    1,250,357     1,250,357      
 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

    3,370,759     3,370,759      
 

Accretion expense

    281,290     281,290      
 

General and administrative expenses

    2,984,286     2,984,286      
 

Share based compensation costs

    4,102,854     4,102,854      
 

Inventory write down

    318,411     318,411      
 

Interest expense

    4,024,708     4,024,708      
 

Other expense

    8,206     8,206      
               
   

Total costs and expenses

    22,963,610     22,963,610      
               

Income (loss) before taxes

    2,710,426     2,710,426      
 

Income tax benefit

    3,433,434         (3,433,434 )
               

Net income (loss)

  $ 6,143,860   $ 2,710,426   $ (3,433,434 )
               

Earnings per share:

                   
 

Basic weighted-average shares outstanding

    92,258,739     92,258,739      
 

Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding

    92,279,536     92,279,536      
 

Basic earnings per share

  $ 0.07   $ 0.03   $ (0.04 )
 

Diluted Earnings per share

  $ 0.07   $ 0.03   $ (0.04 )

 

 
  As Previously
Reported
  As
Restated
  Effect of
Change
 

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity

                   
 

Accumulated Deficit

                   
 

Balance at June 30, 2008

  $   $   $  
 

Conversion from partnership to corporation

    (12,319,212 )   (12,319,212 )    
 

Net income

    6,143,860     2,710,426     (3,433,434 )
               
 

Balance at June 30, 2009

  $ (6,175,352 ) $ (9,608,786 ) $ (3,433,434 )
               

F-36


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2009 and 2008

Note P—Restatement (Continued)

Statement of Cash Flows

 
  As Previously
Reported
  As
Restated
  Effect
of Change
 

Cash flows from operating activities

                   

Net income (loss)

  $ 6,143,860   $ 2,710,426   $ (3,433,434 )

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

                   
 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

    3,370,759     3,370,759      
 

Accretion expense

    281,290     281,290      
 

Amortization of deferred finance costs

    791,515     791,515      
 

Deferred taxes

    (3,433,434 )       3,433,434  
 

Unrealized (gain) loss from price risk management activities

    (11,468,361 )   (11,468,361 )    
 

Share based compensation costs

    4,102,854     4,102,854      
 

Settlement of asset retirement obligations

    (2,389 )   (2,389 )    
 

Inventory write down

    318,411     318,411      
 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

                   
   

Accounts receivable

    968,352     968,352      
   

Prepaids and other current assets

    2,011,273     2,011,273      
   

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

    (1,492,527 )   (1,492,527 )    
   

Due to affiliates, net

    (5,544,658 )   (5,544,658 )    
               
     

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

    (3,953,055 )   (3,953,055 )    

Cash flows from investing activities

                   
 

Restricted cash

    (367,184 )   (367,184 )    
 

Investment in oil and gas properties

    (19,987,934 )   (19,987,934 )    
 

Investment in other property

    (84,084 )   (84,084 )    
 

Investment in fixed assets

    (82,684 )   (82,684 )    
               
     

Net cash used in investing activities

    (20,521,886 )   (20,521,886 )    

Cash flows from financing activities

                   
 

Proceeds from senior credit facility

    10,735,000     10,735,000      
 

Payments on senior credit facility

    (60,188,889 )   (60,188,889 )    
 

Proceeds from initial public offering, net of direct expenses

    74,860,868     74,860,868      
 

Deferred finance costs

    (790,214 )   (790,214 )    
               
     

Net cash provided by financing activities

    24,616,765     24,616,765      
               

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

    141,824     141,824      

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

    188,457     188,457      
               

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

  $ 330,281   $ 330,281   $  
               

Supplemental cash flow information

                   
 

Cash paid during the year for interest

  $ 3,233,193   $ 3,233,193   $  
               
 

Non cash investing and financing activities:

                   
   

Establishment of asset retirement obligations

  $ 126,768   $ 126,768   $  
               
   

Conversion of debt to equity

  $ 10,000,000   $ 10,000,000   $  
               

F-37


Table of Contents

Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Subsidiary Consolidated Financial Statements
for the Three and Nine Months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009

CONTENTS

 
  Page

Consolidated Financial Statements

   
 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 
F-39
 

Consolidated Statements of Operations

 
F-40
 

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity

 
F-41
 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 
F-42
 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 
F-43

F-38


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 
  March 31,
2010
  June 30,
2009
 
 
  (unaudited)
  (restated)
 

Assets

             

Current assets

             
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 649,993   $ 330,281  
 

Restricted cash

    25,000     367,184  
 

Accounts receivable

    2,191,278     1,668,007  
 

Prepaids and other current assets

    1,221,330     777,518  
 

Deferred tax assets

    241,249     128,553  
           
   

Total current assets

    4,328,850     3,271,543  

Property and equipment, at cost

             
 

Oil and gas properties—full cost method

    130,505,756     127,079,180  
 

Fixed assets

    1,657,561     89,659  
           

    132,163,317     127,168,839  
 

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

    (12,424,676 )   (9,580,061 )
           

    119,738,641     117,588,778  
 

Other property

    270,783     164,083  
           
   

Total property and equipment

    120,009,424     117,752,861  

Deferred finance costs, net

    757,261     975,953  
           
   

Total assets

  $ 125,095,535   $ 122,000,357  
           

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

             

Current liabilities

             
 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  $ 3,120,111   $ 3,025,786  
 

Due to affiliates, net

    1,755,647     1,023,205  
 

Liabilities from price risk management

    1,477,104     266,572  
           
   

Total current liabilities

    6,352,862     4,315,563  

Senior credit facility

    35,000,000     31,846,111  

Deferred tax liability

    241,249     128,553  

Liabilities from price risk management

    1,578,765     2,019,697  

Asset retirement obligations

    4,069,505     3,939,246  

Commitments and contingencies

             

Stockholders' equity

   
77,853,154
   
79,751,187
 
           
   

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

  $ 125,095,535   $ 122,000,357  
           

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-39


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(unaudited)

 
  Three Months Ended
March 31,
  Nine Months Ended
March 31,
 
 
  2010   2009   2010   2009  

Income

                         
 

Oil and gas revenues

  $ 3,916,824   $ 2,747,194   $ 11,050,741   $ 11,047,708  
 

Unrealized gain (loss) from price risk management activities

    820,929     (1,036,237 )   (769,600 )   15,834,058  
 

Interest and other income

    1,021     16,910     6,977     52,025  
                   
   

Total income

    4,738,774     1,727,867     10,288,118     26,933,791  

Costs and expenses

                         
 

Lease operating expenses

    1,274,040     1,718,464     4,589,977     5,256,371  
 

Production and ad valorem taxes

    281,551     162,544     769,853     1,008,701  
 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

    960,444     809,059     2,844,615     2,492,747  
 

Accretion expense

    43,420     96,426     130,259     288,909  
 

General and administrative expenses

    884,891     494,523     2,993,688     2,118,228  
 

Share based compensation costs

    1,093,114     1,070,479     3,252,169     3,032,256  
 

Interest expense

    782,198     852,796     2,449,506     2,588,765  
                   
   

Total costs and expenses

    5,319,658     5,204,291     17,030,067     16,785,977  
                   

Income (loss) before income taxes

    (580,884 )   (3,476,424 )   (6,741,949 )   10,147,814  
 

Income tax benefit (expense)

        1,145,626     (1,973 )   (3,899,973 )
                   

Net income (loss)

  $ (580,884 ) $ (2,330,798 ) $ (6,743,922 ) $ 6,247,841  
                   

Earnings (loss) per share:

                         
 

Basic weighted-average shares outstanding

    96,947,494     92,258,739     96,777,026     92,258,739  
 

Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding

    96,947,494     92,258,739     96,777,026     92,258,739  
 

Basic earnings (loss) per share

  $ (0.01 ) $ (0.03 ) $ (0.07 ) $ 0.07  
 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share$

    (0.01 ) $ (0.03 ) $ (0.07 ) $ 0.07  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-40


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity

July 1, 2009 Through March 31, 2010

(unaudited)

 
  Common Stock    
   
   
 
 
  Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated
Deficit
  Total
Stockholders'
Equity
 
 
  Shares   Par value  

Balance at July 1, 2009 (Restated)

    92,258,739     922,587     88,437,386     (9,608,786 )   79,751,187  

Stock issued upon vesting of restricted stock

    1,368,505     13,685     (13,685 )        

Stock issued for the acquisition of assets

    3,320,250     33,203     1,560,517         1,593,720  

Share based compensation

            3,252,169         3,252,169  

Net loss

                (6,743,922 )   (6,743,922 )
                       

Balance at March 31, 2010

    96,947,494   $ 969,475   $ 93,236,387   $ (16,352,708 ) $ 77,853,154  
                       

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-41


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

 
  Nine Months Ended
March 31,
 
 
  2010   2009  

Cash flows from operating activities

             

Net income (loss)

  $ (6,743,922 ) $ 6,247,841  

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

             
 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

    2,844,615     2,492,747  
 

Accretion expense

    130,259     288,909  
 

Amortization of deferred finance costs

    245,629     191,202  
 

Deferred taxes

        3,848,380  
 

Unrealized (gain) loss from price risk management activities

    769,600     (15,834,058 )
 

Share based compensation costs

    3,252,169     3,032,256  
 

Settlement of asset retirement obligations

        (2,389 )
 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

             
   

Accounts receivable

    (523,271 )   1,276,630  
   

Prepaids and other current assets

    (443,812 )   1,769,999  
   

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

    94,325     (2,266,947 )
   

Due to affiliates, net

    732,442     (6,128,397 )
           
     

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

    358,034     (5,083,827 )

Cash flows from investing activities

             
 

Restricted cash

    342,184     (367,184 )
 

Investment in oil and gas properties

    (3,426,576 )   (18,705,060 )
 

Investment in other property

    (4,500 )   (84,084 )
 

Investment in fixed assets

    (76,382 )   (44,328 )
           
     

Net cash used in investing activities

    (3,165,274 )   (19,200,656 )

Cash flows from financing activities

             
 

Proceeds from senior credit facility

    3,153,889     10,000,000  
 

Payments on senior credit facility

        (59,300,000 )
 

Deferred finance costs

    (26,937 )    
 

Proceeds from initial public offering, net of direct expenses

        74,860,866  
           
     

Net cash provided by financing activities

    3,126,952     25,560,866  
           

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

    319,712     1,276,383  

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

    330,281     188,457  
           

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

  $ 649,993   $ 1,464,840  
           

Supplemental cash flow information

             
 

Cash paid during the period for interest

  $ 2,196,099   $ 2,397,563  
           
 

Cash paid during the period for income taxes

  $ 1,973   $  
           
 

Non cash investing and financing activities:

             
   

Establishment of asset retirement obligations

  $   $ 188,094  
           
   

Conversion of debt to equity

  $   $ 10,000,000  
           
   

Common stock issued for acquisition of assets

  $ 1,593,720   $  
           

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-42


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2010

Note A—Organization and Nature of Business

        Resaca Exploitation, L.P. (the "Partnership") was formed on March 1, 2006 for the purpose of acquiring and exploiting interests in oil and gas properties located in New Mexico and Texas and to conduct, directly and indirectly through third parties, operations on the properties. The Partnership was funded and began operations on May 1, 2006. Resaca Exploitation GP, LLC served as the sole general partner (.667%) and various limited partners owned the remaining 99.333%. Under the terms of the limited partnership agreement, profits and losses were allocated to the general partner and limited partners based upon their ownership percentages.

        On July 10, 2008, the Partnership converted from a Delaware partnership to a Texas corporation and became Resaca Exploitation, Inc. ("Resaca"). Following conversion, Resaca became subject to federal and certain state income taxes and adopted a June 30 year end for federal income tax and financial reporting purposes. On July 17, 2008, Resaca Exploitation, Inc. completed an initial public offering (the "Offering") on the AIM Market of the London Stock Exchange (the "AIM"). In the initial public offering, Resaca raised $83.4 million before expenses (see Note G).

        Resaca Operating Company ("ROC"), a wholly-owned subsidiary, was formed on October 16, 2008 for the purpose of operating Resaca's oil and gas properties. Resaca Acquisition Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Merger Sub"), was formed on September 25, 2009 to facilitate Resaca's merger with Cano Petroleum, Inc. ("Cano"). Resaca, ROC and Merger Sub are referred to collectively as "the Company". Activities for ROC and Merger Sub are consolidated in the Company's financial statements.

        On September 29, 2009, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") by and among the Company and Cano. Cano will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company following the merger. Upon consummation of the merger, each share of Cano common stock will be converted into the right to receive 2.1 shares of common stock of the Company, or 0.42 as adjusted for the proposed reverse split of one new common share for each five common shares currently held by Company shareholders. Each share of Cano Series D Convertible Preferred Stock ("Preferred Stock") will be converted into the right to receive one share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company. Based on the closing price of the company common stock on May 13, 2010, the shares to be issued in respect of Cano's common stock would be valued at approximately $65 million. Consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement is conditioned upon, among other things, (1) approval by Cano holders of the common stock and preferred stock, (2) approval of the holders of the common stock of the Company, (3) the listing of the Company common stock on the NYSE Amex, (4) the refinancing of existing bank debt of the Company and Cano, (5) the receipt of required regulatory approvals and (6) the effectiveness of a registration statement relating to the shares of the Company common stock to be issued in the merger. The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for both Cano and the Company, including the right to terminate the Merger Agreement to enter into a Superior Proposal (as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement). In the event of a termination of the Merger Agreement under certain specified circumstances described in the Merger Agreement, one party will be required to pay the other party a termination fee of $3,500,000. On October 23, 2009, the Company filed a Form S-4 with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and subsequently filed numerous amended Forms S-4. Once approved by the SEC, the Form S-4 will serve as a prospectus for Company shareholders as well as a joint proxy statement for both Company shareholders and Cano stockholders to vote on the proposed merger of the two companies, in addition to other matters to be voted on as discussed therein. One

F-43


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

March 31, 2010

Note A—Organization and Nature of Business (Continued)


such matter to be voted upon by Company shareholders is a five for one reverse split of its common shares. The reverse split is being undertaken to achieve a minimum stock price listing requirement of the NYSE Amex of $2.00 per share. At May 13, 2010, the price of each Company common share was $0.68.

        The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements present the financial position of the Company at March 31, 2010, and the results of operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, and cash flows for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. The accompanying audited consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2009, as restated, presents the financial position of the Company at that date. These consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operations for the indicated periods. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending June 30, 2010. Reference is made to the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2009.

Note B—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

        Principles of Consolidation:    The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Resaca and ROC. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

        Cash and Cash Equivalents:    Cash in excess of the Company's daily requirements is generally invested in short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Such investments are carried at cost, which approximates fair value and, for the purposes of reporting cash flows, are considered to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains its cash in bank deposits with various major financial institutions. These accounts, at times, exceed federally insured limits. Deposits in the United States of America are currently guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. The Company monitors the financial condition of the financial institutions and has not experienced any losses on such accounts.

        Restricted Cash:    The Company collateralizes any open letters of credit with cash (see Note F). At March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, the Company had outstanding open letters of credit collateralized by cash of $25,000 and $367,184, respectively.

        Accounts Receivable:    Accounts receivable primarily consists of accrued revenues for oil and gas sales. Management believes that all receivables are fully collectible at March 31, 2010. Therefore, no allowance for doubtful accounts was recorded as of March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009.

        Inventory:    Inventory totaling $612,536 and $732,684 at March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively, consists of piping and tubulars valued at the lower of cost or market and is included within prepaids and other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

        Oil and Gas Properties:    Oil and gas properties are accounted for using the full-cost method of accounting. Under this method, all productive and nonproductive costs incurred in connection with the acquisition, exploration, and development of oil and natural gas reserves are capitalized. This includes any internal costs that are directly related to acquisition, exploration and development activities,

F-44


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

March 31, 2010

Note B—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


including salaries and benefits, but does not include any costs related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities. During the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company capitalized $249,678 and $262,214, respectively, in overhead relating to these internal costs.

        No gains or losses are recognized upon the sale or other disposition of oil and natural gas properties except in transactions that would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves.

        Under the full cost method, the net book value of oil and natural gas properties, less related deferred income taxes, may not exceed the estimated after-tax future net revenues from proved oil and natural gas properties, discounted at 10% (the "Ceiling Limitation"). In arriving at estimated future net revenues, estimated lease operating expenses, development costs, and certain production-related and ad valorem taxes are deducted. In calculating future net revenues, prices and costs in effect at the time of the calculation are held constant indefinitely, except for changes that are fixed and determinable by existing contracts. The excess, if any, of the net book value above the Ceiling Limitation is charged to expense in the period in which it occurs and is not subsequently reinstated. The Company prepared its ceiling test at March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, and no impairment was deemed necessary. Reserve estimates used in determining estimated future net revenues have been prepared by an independent petroleum engineer at year end and also at December 31, 2009.

        The costs of unevaluated oil and natural gas properties are excluded from the amortizable base until the time that either proven reserves are found or it has been determined that such properties are impaired. The Company currently has no material capitalized costs related to unevaluated properties. All capitalized costs are included in the amortization base as of March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009.

        Depreciation and Amortization:    All capitalized costs of oil and natural gas properties and equipment, including the estimated future costs to develop proved reserves, are amortized using the unit-of-production method based on total proved reserves. Depreciation of fixed assets is computed on the straight line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, typically two to five years.

        General and Administrative Expenses:    General and administrative expenses are reported net of recoveries from owners in properties operated by the Company.

        Revenue Recognition:    The Company recognizes oil and gas revenues from its interests in oil and natural gas producing activities as the hydrocarbons are produced and sold.

        Accounting for Price Risk Management Activities:    The Company periodically enters into certain financial derivative contracts utilized for non-trading purposes to hedge the impact of market price fluctuations on its forecasted oil and gas sales. The Company follows the provisions of ASC 815, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities ("ASC 815"), for the accounting of its hedge transactions. ASC 815 establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that all derivative instruments be recorded in the consolidated balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at fair value and requires that the changes in the fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. The Company has certain over-the-counter collar contracts to hedge the cash flow of the forecasted sale of oil and gas sales. The Company did not elect to document and designate these contracts as hedges. Thus, the changes in the fair value of these

F-45


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

March 31, 2010

Note B—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


over-the-counter collars are reflected in earnings for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.

        Income Tax:    The Company is subject to federal income tax, Texas state margin tax, and New Mexico state income tax. The Company follows the guidance in ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires the use of the asset and liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes and provides deferred income taxes for all significant temporary differences.

        The Company follows ASC 740-10, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. The Interpretation prescribes guidance for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. To recognize a tax position, the enterprise determines whether it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation, based solely on the technical merits of the position. A tax position that meets the more likely than not threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to be recognized in the financial statements. The amount of tax benefit recognized with respect to any tax position is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement.

        Deferred Finance Costs:    The Company capitalizes all costs directly related to obtaining financing and such costs are amortized to interest expense over the life of the related facility. At March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, the deferred finance costs balance is presented net of accumulated amortization of $1,771,890 and $1,526,261, respectively.

        Use of Estimates:    Management of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

        Independent petroleum and geological engineers have prepared estimates of the Company's oil and natural gas reserves at December 31, 2009, June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008. Proved reserves, estimated future net revenues and the present value of our reserves are estimated based upon a combination of historical data and estimates of future activity. We have based the value of proved reserves on spot prices on the date of the estimate. The reserve estimates are used in calculating depreciation, depletion and amortization and in the assessment of the Company's ceiling limitation. Significant assumptions are required in the valuation of proved oil and natural gas reserves which, as described herein, may affect the amount at which oil and natural gas properties are recorded. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

        Asset Retirement Obligations:    The Company follows ASC 410 ("ASC 410"), Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations. ASC 410 requires that an asset retirement obligation ("ARO") associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset be recognized as a liability in the period in which a legal obligation is incurred and becomes determinable, with an offsetting increase in the carrying amount of the associated asset. The cost of the tangible asset, including the initially recognized ARO, is depreciated such that the cost of the ARO is recognized over the useful life of the asset. The ARO is recorded at fair value, and accretion expense will be recognized over time as the discounted liability is

F-46


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

March 31, 2010

Note B—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


accreted to its expected settlement value. The fair value of the ARO is measured using expected future cash outflows discounted at the company's credit-adjusted risk-free interest rate.

        Inherent in the fair value calculation of ARO are numerous assumptions and judgments, including the ultimate settlement amounts, inflation factors, credit adjusted discount rates, timing of settlement, and changes in the legal, regulatory, environmental and political environments. To the extent future revisions to these assumptions impact the fair value of the existing ARO liability, a corresponding adjustment is made to the oil and gas property balance.

        The following table is a reconciliation of the asset retirement obligation:

 
  Nine Months Ended March 31,  
 
  2010   2009  

Asset retirement obligation, beginning of the period

  $ 3,939,246   $ 3,533,577  

Liabilities incurred

        58,140  

Liabilities settled

        (2,389 )

Accretion expense

    130,259     288,909  

Revisions in estimated liabilities

        129,954  
           

Asset retirement obligation, end of the period

  $ 4,069,505   $ 4,008,191  
           

        Share-Based Compensation:    The Company follows ASC 718 ("ASC 718"), Compensation-Stock Compensation, for all equity awards granted to employees. ASC 718 requires all companies to expense the fair value of employee stock options and other forms of share-based compensation over the requisite service period. The Company's share-based awards consist of stock options and restricted stock.

        Earnings per Share:    Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the sum of the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period and the dilutive effect of restricted stock awards and the assumed exercise of stock options using the treasury stock method.

        Subsequent Events:    The Company evaluates events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are available for issuance. The Company evaluated such events and transactions through May 18, 2010, the date the financial statements were available to be issued.

Newly Adopted Accounting Principles:

        In June 2009, the FASB issued a standard that established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM ("ASC") and amended the hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP") such that the ASC became the single source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP. The ASC did not change current GAAP, but was intended to simplify user access to all authoritative GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. All previously existing accounting standard documents were superseded and all other accounting literature not

F-47


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

March 31, 2010

Note B—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


included in the ASC is considered non-authoritative. New accounting standards issued subsequent to June 30, 2009 are communicated by the FASB through Accounting Standards Updates (ASUs). The ASC became effective for us on July 1, 2009. This standard did not have an impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Throughout the notes to the consolidated financial statements, references that were previously made to various former authoritative GAAP pronouncements have been conformed to the appropriate section of the ASC.

        ASC 260:    In June 2008, the FASB issued ASC 260 (formerly EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities). ASC 260 addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and need to be included in the calculation of earnings per share under the two-class method. Under ASC 260, share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are "participating securities", and therefore should be included in computing earnings per share using the two-class method. ASC 260 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008. We adopted ASC 260 on July 1, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        ASC 805:    In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC 805, Business Combinations ("ASC 805"). Under ASC 805, an entity is required to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, contractual contingencies, and contingent consideration at their fair value on the acquisition date. It further requires that acquisition-related costs be recognized separately from the acquisition and expensed as incurred. ASC 805 is effective for business combinations consummated in fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted ASC 805 effective July 1, 2009. This statement will change our accounting treatment for prospective business combinations.

        ASC 810:    In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC 810, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51 ("ASC 810"). ASC 810 establishes accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. It also establishes a single method of accounting for changes in a parent's ownership interest in a subsidiary and requires expanded disclosures. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. We adopted ASC 810 on July 1, 2009 and this standard will have an impact on the accounting for any acquisition of noncontrolling interests after that date.

        ASC 815:    In March 2008, the FASB issued ASC 815 (formerly SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—An Amendment of FASB Statement 133). ASC 815 expands the required disclosures to discuss the uses of derivative instruments; the accounting for derivative instruments and related hedged items under ASC 815, and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect the company's financial position, financial performance and cash flows. We adopted ASC 815 on July 1, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        ASC 855:    In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 855, Subsequent Events ("ASC 855") to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date, but

F-48


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

March 31, 2010

Note B—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


prior to the issuance of financial statements. Specifically, ASC 855 sets forth: (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; (2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and (3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. ASC 855 is effective for financial statements issued for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted ASC 855 on June 30, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Accounting Principles Not Yet Adopted:

        Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting:    On December 31, 2008, the SEC issued Release No. 33-8995, "Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting," which revises disclosure requirements for oil and gas companies. In addition to changing the definition and disclosure requirements for oil and gas reserves, the new rules change the requirements for determining oil and gas reserve quantities. These rules permit the use of new technologies to determine proved reserves under certain criteria and allow companies to disclose their probable and possible reserves. The new rules also require companies to report the independence and qualifications of their reserve preparer or auditor and file reports when a third party is relied upon to prepare reserve estimates or conducts a reserve audit. The new rules also require that oil and gas reserves be reported and the full cost ceiling limitation be calculated using a twelve-month average price rather than period-end prices. The new rules are effective for annual reports on Forms 10-K for fiscal years ending on or after December 31, 2009. Early adoption of the new rules is prohibited. Additionally, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on oil and gas reserve estimation and disclosures, as set forth in ASU No. 2010-03, Extractive Activities—Oil and Gas (Topic 932), to align with the requirements of the SEC's revised rules. The Company will begin complying with the disclosure requirements in our annual report for the year ending June 30, 2010. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of these rules on our consolidated financial statements.

        ASU 2010-06:    In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820). ASU 2010-06 Subtopic 820-10 and provides new guidance on improving disclosures about fair value measurements. The new standard requires some new disclosures and clarifies some existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurement. Specifically, the new standard will now require: (a) a reporting entity should disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for transfers and (b) in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unoberservable inputs, a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements. In addition, the new standard clarifies the requirements of the following existing disclosures: (a) for purposes of reporting fair value measurements for each class of assets and liabilities, a reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities and (b) a reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The new standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,

F-49


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

March 31, 2010

Note B—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted. The adoption of the requirements of this standard in the quarter ended March 31, 2010 did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. We are still in the process of evaluating the impact, if any, on our consolidated financial statements, of the standard requirements applicable for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010.

Note C—Related Party Transactions

        The Company receives support services from Torch Energy Advisors Incorporated ("TEAI") and its subsidiaries, an affiliate of the Company. These support services include office administration, risk management, corporate secretary, legal services, corporate and litigation legal services, graphic services, tax department services, financial planning and analysis, information management, financial reporting and accounting services, and engineering and technical services. The Company paid TEAI and a subsidiary of TEAI $364,606 and $263,675 during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, for such services. The Company paid TEAI and a subsidiary of TEAI $1,041,109 and $1,677,008 during the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, for such services. The majority of such fees are included in general and administrative expenses.

        In the ordinary course of business, the Company incurs payable balances with TEAI resulting from the payment of costs and expenses on behalf of the Company, and from the payment of support services fees. Such amounts are settled on a regular basis, generally monthly.

        On July 1, 2009, the Company acquired certain workover rigs, reversing units and related assets from Permian Basin Well Services, LLC ("PBWS") in exchange for 3,320,250 newly issued shares of the Company's common stock, valued at $1,593,720. PBWS is a wholly-owned subsidiary of TEAI.

Note D—Notes Payable

        On May 1, 2006, the Company entered into a $10 million Senior Subordinated Secured Convertible Term Loan Facility ("Convertible Debt") with third parties. The aggregate loan amount under the Convertible Debt was $10 million, all of which was funded at closing. Interest was paid quarterly on the Convertible Debt, at a rate of 6% per annum for cash dividends and 8% per annum in the event the Company chose to pay interest in kind ("PIK"). The lenders could convert their loans, in whole or in part, to ownership interests in the Company at any time at an 18% premium, provided that the minimum conversion loan amount is $500,000. PIK interest was also able to be converted to ownership interests. The Company had the right to redeem the subordinated debt after May 1, 2009, but was required to pay an early redemption premium. Early redemption premium amounts varied in years three, four and five and were designed to ensure the lenders different internal rates of return at those points in time. To the extent the Convertible Debt was neither redeemed by the Company nor converted by the lenders, the full principal amount was to be due on May 1, 2012. The Convertible Debt contained, among other terms, provisions for the maintenance of certain financial ratios and restrictions on additional debt. Recourse for the Convertible Debt was limited to the Company, as borrower, and the note was secured by all of the Company's oil and gas properties. In July 2008, holders of the Convertible Debt converted their notes into common stock of the Company.

F-50


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

March 31, 2010

Note D—Notes Payable (Continued)

        On May 1, 2006, the Company entered into an $85 million Senior Secured Loan Facility (the "Facility") with third parties. The Facility included two tranches, A and B, of differing amounts and terms. The maximum credit amount under Tranche A was $70 million, $50 million of which was funded at closing. The Tranche B maximum credit amount was $15 million. The full amount was funded at closing and no additional borrowings were permitted. Prior to the July 2008 amendment (discussed below), interest accrued on the indebtedness at the one month LIBOR plus 6% for Tranche A and interest accrued at the one month LIBOR plus 9% for Tranche B. Interest payments were due monthly. Scheduled principal payments under Tranche A began on May 1, 2009 and were scheduled to occur monthly, in even increments. Tranche A was to mature on May 1, 2012. On June 11, 2008, the credit agreement was amended to extend the maturity of Tranche B to August 31, 2008. The Facility contained, among other terms, provisions for the maintenance of certain financial ratios and restrictions on additional debt. On June 26, 2009, the outstanding balance of the Facility was refinanced as described below.

        In July 2008, with the proceeds received from the Offering, the Company paid the $15 million outstanding balance on Tranche B which extinguished that portion of the Facility and also repaid $44.3 million of the $66.3 million outstanding on Tranche A. In conjunction with the partial repayment of Tranche A, the maximum credit amount under Tranche A was lowered to $60 million, a 4% LIBOR floor was added, and certain financial covenants were modified. The interest rate on outstanding borrowings under the facility was 10% at June 25, 2008. Recourse for the Facility was limited to the Company, as borrower, and the note was secured by all of the Company's oil and gas properties.

        On June 26, 2009, the Company entered into a $50 million, three-year Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility ("CIT Facility") with CIT Capital USA Inc. ("CIT") that matures on July 1, 2012. The CIT Facility replaced the Facility entered into in 2006 which had converted to a term loan in May 2009. The initial borrowing base of the CIT Facility is $35 million and CIT serves as administrative agent. Interest on the CIT Facility is set at LIBOR plus 5.5% subject to a 2.5% LIBOR floor. Recourse for the CIT Facility is limited to the Company, as borrower, and the note is secured by all of the Company's oil and gas properties. At March 31, 2010, the interest rate was 8.0%. As a condition of closing the CIT Facility, the Company entered into additional natural gas hedges for January 2011 through June 2012 and additional oil hedges for June 2011 through June 2012. Under the CIT Facility, the lenders may require the Company to hedge more than 50% of its projected future oil and gas production attributable to proved developed reserves for a period of thirty-six months. The CIT Facility contains, among other terms, provisions for the maintenance of certain financial ratios and restrictions on additional debt. On December 22, 2009, Resaca executed an amendment to the CIT Facility, which amended some of the financial ratio requirements. As of March 31, 2010, the Company was not in compliance with one of the financial covenants and has subsequently obtained a waiver for such noncompliance.

F-51


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

March 31, 2010

Note D—Notes Payable (Continued)

        Scheduled maturities as of March 31, 2010 are as follows:

Period Ending March 31,
   
 

2011

  $  

2012

     

2013

    35,000,000  
       

Total

  $ 35,000,000  
       

        On April 26, 2010, the Company received an updated firm commitment from Union Bank, N.A. ("Union Bank") and Natixis New York Branch for a new $200 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the "Union Bank Facility"). Union Bank will act as a lead arranger and administrative agent for the Union Bank Facility. The Union Bank Facility will close in conjunction with the Company's proposed merger with Cano. Proceeds from the Union Bank Facility will be used to repay and refinance Resaca's and Cano's existing debt, to fund future acquisitions and for general corporate purposes. The Union Bank Facility will be governed by semi-annual borrowing base redeterminations assigned to the Company's proved crude oil and natural gas reserves following the Cano merger. An initial borrowing base of $90 million has been established based on the Company and Cano's combined reserves.

Note E—Derivative Financial Instruments

        The Company enters into hedging transactions with a major counterparty to reduce exposure to fluctuations in the price of crude oil and natural gas. We use financially settled crude oil and natural gas zero-cost collars. Any gains or losses resulting from the change in fair value are recorded to unrealized gain (loss) from price risk management activities, whereas gains and losses from the settlement of hedging contracts are recorded in oil and gas revenues.

        With a zero-cost collar, the counterparty is required to make a payment to us if the settlement price for any settlement period is below the floor price of the collar, and we are required to make a payment to the counterparty if the settlement price for any settlement period is above the cap price for the collar.

        Cash settlements for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 resulted in a decrease in crude oil and natural gas sales in the amount of $254,385 and an increase in crude oil and natural gas sales in the amount of $683,016, respectively. Cash settlements for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 resulted in a decrease in crude oil and natural gas sales in the amount of $233,615 and $705,451, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we recognized an unrealized gain of $820,929 and an unrealized loss of $1,036,237, respectively, on derivative financial transactions that did not qualify for hedge accounting. For the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we recognized an unrealized loss of $769,600 and an unrealized gain of $15,834,058, respectively, on derivative financial transactions that did not qualify for hedge accounting.

F-52


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

March 31, 2010

Note E—Derivative Financial Instruments (Continued)

        As of March 31, 2010, we had the following contracts outstanding:

 
  Crude Oil   Natural Gas    
   
 
 
   
   
  Total    
   
  Total   Total  
Period
  Volume
(Bbls)
  Contract
Price(1)
  Asset
(Liability)
  Fair Value
(Loss)
  Volume
(MMBtus)
  Contract
Price(1)
  Asset
(Liability)
  Fair Value
(Loss)
  Asset
(Liability)
  Fair Value
(Loss)(2)
 

Collars

                                                             

4/10 - 12/10

    10,000     58.00/66.30     (1,372,382 )   (864,601 )   20,000     6.30/11.50     373,391     235,236     (998,991 )   (629,365 )

1/11 - 5/11

    10,000     58.00/66.30     (879,064 )   (553,810 )   10,000     6.30/11.00     68,248     42,996     (810,816 )   (510,814 )

6/11 - 12/11

    9,000     60.00/77.00     (788,888 )   (496,999 )   11,000     5.50/6.90     37,060     23,348     (751,828 )   (473,651 )

1/12 - 6/12

    6,000     60.00/77.00     (526,279 )   (331,556 )                           (526,279 )   (331,556 )

Swaps

                                                             

1/11 - 5/11

                            1,000     6.10     4,612     2,906     4,612     2,906  

1/12 - 6/12

                            7,500     6.30     27,433     17,283     27,433     17,283  

Total

              $ (3,566,613 ) $ (2,246,966 )             $ 510,744   $ 321,769   $ (3,055,869 ) $ (1,925,197 )

(1)
The contract price is weighted-averaged by contract volume.

(2)
The gain (loss) on derivative contracts is net of applicable income taxes.

        The following table quantifies the fair values, on a gross basis, of all our derivative contracts and identifies its balance sheet location as of March 31, 2010:

 
  Asset Derivatives   (Liability) Derivatives    
 
 
  Balance Sheet
Location
  Fair Value   Balance Sheet
Location
  Fair Value   Total
Asset
(Liability)
 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815

                           
 

Commodity Contracts

  Derivative financial instruments         Derivative financial instruments              

  Current Liability     454,294   Current Liability     (1,931,398 )   (1,477,104 )

  Non-current Liability     321,963   Non-current Liability     (1,900,728 )   (1,578,765 )
 

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815

        776,257         (3,832,126 )   (3,055,869 )
                       

Total derivatives

      $ 776,257       $ (3,832,126 ) $ (3,055,869 )

        While notional amounts are used to express the volume of puts and over-the-counter options, the amounts potentially subject to credit risk, in the event of nonperformance by the third parties, are substantially smaller. The Company does not anticipate any material impact to its financial position or results of operations as a result of nonperformance by third parties on financial instruments related to its option contracts.

Note F—Commitments and Contingencies

        The Company, from time to time, is involved in certain claims arising out of the normal course of business, none currently outstanding of which, in the opinion of management, will have any material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company as a whole.

F-53


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

March 31, 2010

Note F—Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

        The Company has open letters of credit of approximately $25,000 at March 31, 2010 which are fully collateralized by restricted cash balances.

Note G—Initial Public Offering

        On July 17, 2008, the Company completed an initial public offering on the AIM. In the initial public offering, the Company raised $83.4 million before expenses. Proceeds received were used to repay outstanding borrowings on the Facility, extinguish the balance outstanding to its affiliates, and purchase an overriding royalty interest from a third party covering all of our existing oil and gas properties for $7 million. In conjunction with the initial public offering, certain officers and directors were granted restricted stock awards for an aggregate 4.1 million shares of our common stock that vest ratably over three years, and, 1.7 million stock options, each option to purchase one share of our common stock at an exercise price of 1.34 British pounds per share. The options vest ratably over three years and will expire on July 17, 2016.

Note H—Share-Based Compensation

        The Company has adopted a Share Incentive Plan ("The Plan") to foster and promote the long-term financial success of the Company and to increase shareholder value by attracting, motivating and retaining key personnel. The Plan is considered an important component of total compensation offered to key employees and outside directors. The Plan consists of stock option and restricted stock awards. The Company expenses the fair-value of the share-based payments over the requisite service period of the awards. At March 31, 2010, there was $5,762,344 in unrecognized compensation expense to be recognized over the next 2.63 years. The stock options and restricted stock both vest over a three year period. At March 31, 2010 there were 2,301,787 stock options and 2,737,010 shares of restricted stock outstanding. Additionally, the Board of Directors has the ability to authorize the issuance of another combined 2,818,572 shares in stock options and restricted stock to key personnel.

        The following summary represents restricted stock awards outstanding at March 31, 2010:

 
  Shares   Grant Date
Fair Value
 

Awards outstanding at June 30, 2009

    4,105,515   $ 11,018,184  

Restricted shares vested

    (1,368,505 )   (3,672,728 )

Restricted shares forfeited

         
           

Awards outstanding at March 31, 2010

    2,737,010   $ 7,345,456  
           

        A rollforward of stock options awards outstanding at March 31, 2010 is as follows:

 
  Shares   Average
Exercise Price
  Grant Date
Fair Value
 

Options outstanding at June 30, 2009

    1,756,787   $ 1.97   $ 1,829,000  

Grants

    595,000     0.74     276,647  

Exercised or forfeited

    (50,000 )   (.35 )   (6,463 )
               

Options outstanding at March 31, 2010

    2,301,787   $ 1.69   $ 2,099,184  

F-54


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

March 31, 2010

Note H—Share-Based Compensation (Continued)

        A summary of stock options outstanding at March 31, 2010 is as follows:

Grant Date
  Exercise
Price*
  Option
Awards
Outstanding
  Remaining
Option
Life
  Option
Awards
Exercisable
 

07/17/08

  $ 1.98     1,706,787     6.30     568,929  

9/25/09

    0.76     395,000     7.49      

11/16/09

    0.71     200,000     7.63      
                   

  $ 1.66     2,301,787     6.62     568,929  

Note I—Fair Value Measurements

        ASC 820 requires enhanced disclosures regarding the assets and liabilities carried at fair value. The pronouncement establishes a fair value hierarchy such that "Level 1" measurements include unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market, "Level 2" measurements include quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market which have been adjusted for items such as effects of restrictions for transferability and those that are not quoted but observable through corroboration with observable market data, including quoted market prices for similar assets, and "Level 3" measurements include those that are unobservable and of a highly subjective measure.

        The Company utilizes the market approach for recurring fair value measurements of its oil and gas hedges. The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Company's financial assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2010. As required by ASC 820, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement:

 
  Market Prices
for Identical
Items (Level 1)
  Significant Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
  Total  

Assets:

                         
 

Oil and Gas Hedges

      $       $  
                   

Total Assets

                 
                   

Liabilities:

                         
 

Oil and Gas Hedges

        3,055,869         3,055,869  
                   

Total Liabilities

        3,055,869         3,055,869  
                   

Total Net Liabilities

      $ 3,055,869       $ 3,055,869  
                   

        The carrying amounts of the Company's cash and cash equivalents, receivables and payables approximate the fair value at March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009 because of their short-term maturities. The carrying amounts of the Company's debt instruments at March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009 approximate their fair values due to the interest rates being at market.

F-55


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

March 31, 2010

Note J—Stockholders' Equity

        As described in Note A, the Company converted from a partnership to a corporation on July 10, 2008. As such, partners' capital was converted to stockholders' equity. At March 31, 2010, stockholders' equity was composed of the following:

Common Stock ($.01 par value)

  $ 969,475  

Additional Paid-in Capital

    93,236,387  

Accumulated Deficit

    (16,352,708 )
       

Total Stockholders' Equity

  $ 77,853,154  
       

        At March 31, 2010, the Company had 230,000,000 common shares authorized and 96,947,494 shares issued and outstanding.

Note K—Employee Benefit Plans

        Under the Resaca Exploitation, Inc 401(k) Plan (the "401K Plan") established in fiscal year 2009, contributions are made to the 401K Plan by qualified employees at their election and our matching contributions to the 401K Plan are made at specified rates. Our contribution to the 401K Plan for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $9,154 and $ 8,431, respectively. Our contribution to the 401K Plan for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $25,949 and $8,431, respectively.

Note L—Liquidity

        As of March 31, 2010, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $0.7 million and a working capital deficit of $2.0 million. The Company had fully drawn on the amounts available under the Company's CIT Facility at March 31, 2010. The Company anticipates cash flows from operations will be sufficient to satisfy its currently expected working capital requirements for the next twelve months. The Company will also have the flexibility to modify its capital expenditure program based on actual operating cash flows.

        On January 27, 2010, the Company filed a registration statement and later filed amendment number three to the registration statement on April 29, 2010 covering a proposed underwritten offering of its common stock, which is expected to close in conjunction with the closing of the merger. Also, as discussed in Note D, the Company has received a commitment for the Union Bank Facility which, combined with the proceeds of the common stock offering, will provide funding for Resaca's working capital and capital expenditures following the Cano merger. If the Company's cash flows from operations, the proceeds from the proposed public stock offering, and borrowings from the Union Bank Facility are not sufficient or successful, the Company would need to consider other alternatives, including selling certain non core properties or other credit and capital market alternatives to fund our operations and capital needs. There can be no assurance that any of these alternatives will be available at terms acceptable to the Company or at all.

        On May 18, 2010, the Company, TEAI, and CIT entered into an agreement, which provides that, if the CIT Facility is not repaid in full by June 30, 2010, the outstanding payable by Resaca to Torch as of June 30, 2010 (the "Torch Payable") shall be contractually subordinated to amounts payable under

F-56


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

March 31, 2010

Note L—Liquidity (Continued)


the CIT Facility. Further, the agreement provides that Resaca and Torch shall enter into a subordinated note payable by Resaca to Torch in the amount of the Torch Payable (the "Torch Note"). The Torch Note shall have a maturity date of October 1, 2012 and shall bear interest at Amegy Bank's prime rate plus two percent. The maturity date shall be accelerated in the event the CIT Facility is repaid in full. Interest shall only be payable in kind as long as the CIT Facility is outstanding. In the event the Torch Payable is converted into the Torch Note, such conversion will reclassify the Torch Payable from a current liability to a long-term liability on the Company's balance sheet as of June 30, 2010, which will significantly enhance the Company's ability to satisfy its financial covenants under the CIT Facility.

Note M—Restatement

        During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company recognized the benefit of its deferred tax assets in excess of its deferred tax liabilities. Management subsequently determined that it should have provided a full valuation allowance on its net deferred tax assets from the date of the conversion from a partnership to a corporation as it is not more likely than not that such net deferred tax asset will be realized in the future. Accordingly, the financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2009 have been restated to limit the recognition of the Company's deferred tax assets to the amount of its deferred tax

F-57


Table of Contents


Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

March 31, 2010

Note M—Restatement (Continued)


liabilities. The restatement discussed above had the following effects on the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009, as compared to the amounts previously reported.

 
  As of June 30, 2009  
Balance Sheet
  As Previously
Reported
  As
Restated
  Effect Change  

Assets

                   

Current assets

                   
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 330,281   $ 330,281   $  
 

Restricted cash

    367,184     367,184      
 

Accounts receivable

    1,668,007     1,668,007      
 

Prepaids and other current assets

    777,518     777,518      
 

Deferred tax assets

    216,444     128,553     (87,891 )
               
   

Total current assets

    3,359,434     3,271,543     (87,891 )

Property and Equipment, at cost

                   
 

Oil and gas properties—full cost method

    127,079,180     127,079,180      
 

Fixed assets

    89,659     89,659      
               

    127,168,839     127,168,839      
 

Accumulated, depreciation, depletion and amortization

    (9,580,061 )   (9,580,061 )    
               

    117,588,778     117,588,778      
 

Other property

    164,083     164,083      
               
   

Total property and equipment

    117,752,861     117,752,861      

Deferred tax asset

    3,216,990         (3,216,990 )

Deferred finance costs, net

    975,953     975,953      
               
   

Total assets

  $ 125,305,238   $ 122,000,357   $ (3,304,881 )
               

Liabilities and Owners' Equity (Deficit)

                   

Current liabilities

                   
 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  $ 3,025,786   $ 3,025,786   $  
 

Due to affiliates, net

    1,023,205     1,023,205      
 

Liabilities from price risk management

    266,572     266,572      
               
   

Total current liabilities

    4,315,563     4,315,563      

Senior credit facility, net of current portion

    31,846,111     31,846,111      

Deferred tax liability

        128,553     128,553  

Liabilities from price risk management

    2,019,697     2,019,697      

Asset retirement obligations

    3,939,246     3,939,246      

Commitments and contingencies

                   

Owners' equity (deficit)

    83,184,621     79,751,187     (3,433,434 )
               
   

Total liabilities and owners' equity (deficit)

  $ 125,305,238   $ 122,000,357   $ (3,304,881 )
               

F-58


Table of Contents


INDEX TO CANO PETROLEUM, INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Cano Petroleum, Inc.—Years Ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007

   

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 
F-60

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 
F-61

Consolidated Statements of Operations

 
F-62

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity

 
F-63

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 
F-64

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 
F-65

F-59


Table of Contents


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Cano Petroleum, Inc.
Fort Worth, Texas

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cano Petroleum, Inc. and subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cano Petroleum, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have also audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated September 28, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ HEIN & ASSOCIATES LLP
Dallas, Texas
September 28, 2009

F-60


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 
  June 30,  
In Thousands, Except Shares and Per Share Amounts

 
  2009   2008  
ASSETS
 

Current assets

             
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 392   $ 697  
 

Accounts receivable

    2,999     3,916  
 

Deferred tax assets

        3,592  
 

Derivative assets

    4,955      
 

Inventory and other current assets

    810     642  
 

Assets held for sale (Note 8)

        25,912  
           
       

Total current assets

    9,156     34,759  
           

Oil and gas properties, successful efforts method

    288,857     247,930  

Less accumulated depletion and depreciation

    (40,208 )   (7,962 )
           

Net oil and gas properties

    248,649     239,968  
           

Fixed assets and other, net

    3,240     2,096  

Derivative assets

    2,882     125  

Goodwill

    101     786  
           

TOTAL ASSETS

  $ 264,028   $ 277,734  
           
     

LIABILITIES, TEMPORARY EQUITY AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

             

Current liabilities

             
 

Accounts payable

  $ 4,434   $ 8,679  
 

Accrued liabilities

    2,003     2,840  
 

Deferred tax liabilities

    1,431      
 

Liabilities associated with discontinued operations (Note 8)

        1,324  
 

Oil and gas sales payable

    702     815  
 

Derivative liabilities

    159     9,978  
 

Current portion of asset retirement obligations

    86     345  
           
       

Total current liabilities

    8,815     23,981  

Long-term liabilities

             
 

Long-term debt (Note 6)

    55,700     73,500  
 

Asset retirement obligations

    2,818     2,865  
 

Deferred litigation credit (Note 17)

        6,000  
 

Derivative liabilities

        16,390  
 

Deferred tax liabilities

    22,831     26,062  
           
       

Total liabilities

    90,164     148,798  
           

Temporary equity

             
 

Series D convertible preferred stock and cumulative paid-in-kind dividends; par value
$.0001 per share, stated value $1,000 per share; 49,116 shares authorized; 23,849 and
44,474 shares issued at June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively; liquidation
preference at June 30, 2009 and 2008 of $26,987 and $48,353, respectively

    25,405     45,086  
           

Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)

             

Stockholders' equity

             
 

Common stock, par value $.0001 per share; 100,000,000 authorized; 47,297,910 and
45,594,833 shares issued and outstanding, respectively, at June 30, 2009; and
40,523,168 and 39,254,874 shares issued and outstanding, respectively, at June 30, 2008

    5     4  
 

Additional paid-in capital

    189,526     121,831  
 

Accumulated deficit

    (40,375 )   (37,414 )
 

Treasury stock, at cost; 1,703,077 and 1,268,294 shares at June 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively

    (697 )   (571 )
           
       

Total stockholders' equity

    148,459     83,850  
           

TOTAL LIABILITIES, TEMPORARY EQUITY AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

  $ 264,028   $ 277,734  
           

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.

F-61


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 
  Years Ended June 30,  
In Thousands, Except Per Share Data

 
  2009   2008   2007  
 
 

Operating Revenues:

                   
 

Crude oil sales

  $ 19,222   $ 23,447   $ 13,818  
 

Natural gas sales

    5,875     10,886     6,833  
 

Other revenue

    312     317      
               
   

Total operating revenues

    25,409     34,650     20,651  
               

Operating Expenses:

                   
 

Lease operating

    18,842     13,273     8,733  
 

Production and ad valorem taxes

    2,352     2,454     1,695  
 

General and administrative

    19,156     14,859     12,635  
 

Impairment of long-lived assets (Note 14)

    26,670          
 

Exploration expense (Note 9)

    11,379          
 

Depletion and depreciation

    5,720     3,903     3,202  
 

Accretion of discount on asset retirement obligations

    305     204     131  
               
   

Total operating expenses

    84,424     34,693     26,396  
               

Loss from operations

   
(59,015

)
 
(43

)
 
(5,745

)

Other income (expense):

                   
 

Interest expense and other

    (513 )   (761 )   (1,681 )
 

Impairment of goodwill

    (685 )        
 

Gain (loss) on derivatives (Notes 7 and 13)

    43,790     (31,955 )   (847 )
               
   

Total other income (expense)

    42,592     (32,716 )   (2,528 )
               

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes

   
(16,423

)
 
(32,759

)
 
(8,273

)

Deferred income tax benefit (Note 16)

    4,712     11,767     2,970  
               

Loss from continuing operations

   
(11,711

)
 
(20,992

)
 
(5,303

)

Income from discontinued operations, net of related taxes of $6,441 in 2009, $1,953 in 2008 and $2,539 in 2007 (Note 8)

    11,480     3,471     4,513  
               

Net loss

    (231 )   (17,521 )   (790 )

Preferred stock dividend

   
(2,730

)
 
(4,083

)
 
(3,169

)

Preferred stock repurchased for less than carrying amount

    10,890          
               

Net income (loss) applicable to common stock

 
$

7,929
 
$

(21,604

)

$

(3,959

)
               

Net income (loss) per share—basic and diluted

                   
 

Continuing operations

  $ (0.08 ) $ (0.70 ) $ (0.28 )
 

Discontinued operations

    0.25     0.10     0.15  
               

Net income (loss) per share—basic and diluted

  $ 0.17   $ (0.60 ) $ (0.13 )
               

Weighted average common shares outstanding

                   
 

Basic and Diluted

    45,361     35,829     30,758  
               

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.

F-62


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 
  Common Stock    
   
  Treasury Stock    
 
 
  Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated
Deficit
   
 
Dollar Amounts in Thousands
  Shares   Amount   Shares   Amount   Total  

Balance at July 1, 2006

    26,987,941   $ 2   $ 53,055   $ (11,851 )   1,268,294   $ (571 ) $ 40,635  

Net proceeds from issuance of common shares and warrants

    6,584,247     1     29,683                 29,684  

Issuance of common shares for acquisition of oil and gas properties

    404,204         1,854                 1,854  

Stock-based compensation expense

    (20,000 )       830                 830  

Forfeiture settlements

            (183 )               (183 )

Preferred stock dividend

                (3,169 )           (3,169 )

Net loss

                (790 )           (790 )
                               

Balance at June 30, 2007

    33,956,392     3     85,239     (15,810 )   1,268,294     (571 )   68,861  

Issuance of restricted stock

    949,000                          

Stock-based compensation expense

            2,905                 2,905  

Net proceeds from issuance of common shares from private placement and other

    3,575,000     1     23,851                 23,852  

Net proceeds from issuance of common shares for warrants exercised

    1,228,851         5,194                 5,194  

Common stock issued for preferred stock conversion

    813,925         4,642                 4,642  

Preferred stock dividend

                (4,083 )           (4,083 )

Net loss

                (17,521 )           (17,521 )
                               

Balance at June 30, 2008

    40,523,168     4     121,831     (37,414 )   1,268,294     (571 )   83,850  

Net proceeds from issuance of common shares on July 1, 2008

    7,000,000     1     53,907                 53,908  

Forfeiture and surrender of restricted stock

    (225,258 )       (261 )               (261 )

Stock-based compensation expense

            3,159                 3,159  

Preferred stock dividend

                (2,730 )           (2,730 )

Preferred stock repurchased for less than carrying amount

            10,890                 10,890  

Shares returned to treasury stock from escrow related to acquisition of W.O. Energy of Nevada, Inc. (Note 17)

                    434,783     (126 )   (126 )

Net loss

                (231 )           (231 )
                               

Balance at June 30, 2009

    47,297,910   $ 5   $ 189,526   $ (40,375 )   1,703,077   $ (697 ) $ 148,459  
                               

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.

F-63


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 
  Years Ended June 30,  
In Thousands
  2009   2008   2007  
Cash flow from operating activities:
 
 

Net loss

  $ (231 ) $ (17,521 ) $ (790 )
   

Adjustments needed to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operations:

                   
     

Unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives

    (36,900 )   29,370     1,810  
     

Gain on sale of oil and gas properties

    (19,246 )       (3,811 )
     

Exploration expense

    11,379          
     

Accretion of discount on asset retirement obligations

    308     219     154  
     

Depletion and depreciation

    5,735     5,009     4,425  
     

Impairment of oil and gas properties

    30,186          
     

Impairment of goodwill

    685          
     

Stock-based compensation expense

    3,159     2,905     647  
     

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

    1,731     (9,901 )   (484 )
     

Amortization of debt issuance costs and prepaid expenses

    1,457     1,312     2,231  
     

Treasury stock

    (126 )        
 

Changes in assets and liabilities relating to operations:

                   
   

Restricted cash

        6,000     (6,000 )
   

Accounts receivable

    1,408     (844 )   (521 )
   

Derivative assets

    2,423     (291 )   (1,619 )
   

Inventory and other current assets and liabilities

    (1,244 )   (1,077 )   (794 )
   

Accounts payable

    (833 )   405     510  
   

Accrued liabilities

    (6,271 )   1,139     1,132  
   

Oil and gas sales payable

    (229 )   303     (232 )
   

Deferred litigation credit

            6,000  
               

Net cash provided by (used in) operations

    (6,609 )   17,028     2,658  
               

Cash flow from investing activities:

                   
 

Additions to oil and gas properties

    (56,202 )   (87,393 )   (46,324 )
 

Proceeds from sale of equipment used in oil and gas activities

        3,000      
 

Additions to fixed assets and other

    (1,333 )   (358 )   (347 )
 

Proceeds from sale of oil and gas properties

    40,186         6,817  
               

Net cash used in investing activities

    (17,349 )   (84,751 )   (39,854 )
               

Cash flow from financing activities:

                   
 

Repayments of long-term debt

    (128,500 )   (23,000 )   (68,750 )
 

Borrowings of long-term debt

    110,700     63,000     33,500  
 

Payments for debt issuance costs

    (933 )   (507 )   (190 )
 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net

    53,908     29,046     29,684  
 

Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net

            45,849  
 

Repurchases of preferred stock

    (10,377 )        
 

Payment of deferred offering costs

        (287 )    
 

Payment of preferred stock dividend

    (1,145 )   (1,951 )   (1,423 )
               

Net cash provided by financing activities

    23,653     66,301     38,670  
               

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

    (305 )   (1,422 )   1,474  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

    697     2,119     645  
               

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $ 392   $ 697   $ 2,119  
               

Supplemental disclosure of noncash transactions:

                   
 

Payments of preferred stock dividend in kind

  $ 1,585   $ 2,132   $ 1,747  
 

Preferred stock repurchased for less than carrying amount

  $ 10,890   $   $  
 

Common stock issued for preferred stock conversion

  $   $ 4,642   $  
 

Common stock issued for acquisition of oil and gas properties

  $   $   $ 1,854  

Supplemental disclosure of cash transactions:

                   
 

Cash paid during the period for interest

  $ 1,852   $ 3,298   $ 3,074  

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.

F-64


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. ORGANIZATION

        Cano Petroleum, Inc. (together with its direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, "Cano," "we," "us," or the "Company") is an independent crude oil and natural gas company based in Fort Worth, Texas. Our strategy is to exploit our current undeveloped reserves and acquire, where economically prudent, assets suitable for enhanced oil recovery ("EOR") techniques at a low cost. We intend to convert these proved undeveloped and/or unproved reserves into proved producing reserves by applying water, gas and/or chemical flooding and other EOR techniques. Our assets are located onshore U.S. in Texas, New Mexico and Oklahoma.

2. LIQUIDITY

        At June 30, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents of $0.4 million and working capital of $0.3 million. Our working capital balance included a $5.0 million derivative current asset and a $1.4 million deferred tax current liability. For the year ended June 30, 2009, we had net income applicable to common stock of $7.9 million and a loss from operations of $59.0 million, including a $26.7 million impairment of long-lived assets (see Note 14), $11.4 million of exploration expense (see Note 9) and $6.6 million of legal and settlement expenses in connection with the Panhandle fire litigation (see Note 17). For the year ended June 30, 2009, our cash used in operations of $6.6 million was negatively impacted by $10.7 million of settlement payments, net of reimbursements, related to the resolution of the Panhandle fire litigation.

        We depend on our credit agreements, as described in Note 6, to fund a portion of our operating and capital needs. Under our senior credit agreement, the initial and current borrowing base, based upon our proved reserves, is $60.0 million. At June 30, 2009, our remaining available borrowing capacity under the senior credit agreement was $19.3 million, and at September 28, 2009, our remaining borrowing capacity was $13.8 million. Pursuant to the terms of our senior credit agreement, our borrowing base is to be redetermined based upon our June 30, 2009 reserve report. We have submitted our reserve report and other financial information to our lenders.

        At June 30, 2009, we were in compliance with the debt covenants contained in each of our credit agreements. The determination for the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2009 will be the first financial covenant tests which exclude the gain from our sale of the Pantwist Properties (see Note 8). Based upon our six month operating results through June 30, 2009, we may not be in compliance with all of our financial covenants when we reach the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2009. If a combination of increased production, rising commodity prices, changes in our capital structure and other actions do not occur by December 31, 2009, we anticipate not being in compliance with the covenants. In that event, we will seek covenant relief from our lenders, though there can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining such relief.

        We have taken, and are considering taking, actions to ensure the aforementioned covenant compliance and sufficient liquidity to meet our obligations for the twelve months ending June 30, 2010, which includes funding our capital expenditure budget of $13.9 million. Actions we have taken during the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 to improve liquidity include: negotiating lower service rates with vendors, employee workforce reductions and shutting-in uneconomic wells. As discussed in Note 7, we have derivative contracts in place to protect us from falling crude oil and natural gas commodity prices on a portion of our production (through December 2012) and rising interest rates related to a portion of our outstanding debt (through January 2012). We are also considering credit and capital markets alternatives.

F-65


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2. LIQUIDITY (Continued)

        During each year of our prior five years in existence, we have successfully accessed the credit and capital markets to fund our operations and capital needs.

        We believe the combination of (i) cash on hand, (ii) cash flow generated from the expected success of prior capital development projects, (iii) debt available under our credit agreements and (iv) our ability to access the equity markets, provide sufficient means to conduct our operations, meet our contractual obligations and undertake our capital expenditure program for the twelve months ending June 30, 2010. To the extent that cash on hand as of June 30, 2009, cash flow generated by operations subsequent to June 30, 2009 and borrowings under our credit agreements are insufficient to fund our operating cash flow requirements and our capital expenditure plans, we will need to (i) raise capital through the issuance of debt or equity securities (ii) refinance our existing credit arrangements, (iii) divest oil and gas property assets, (iv) reduce operating and capital expenditures, and (v) pursue strategic alternatives. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in refinancing our credit arrangements or raising capital through the issuance of our debt or equity securities.

3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Consolidation and Use of Estimates

        The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") and include the accounts of Cano and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated. In preparing the accompanying financial statements, management has made certain estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts in the financial statements and disclosures of contingencies. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Significant assumptions are required in the valuation of proved crude oil and natural gas reserves, which may affect the amount at which crude oil and natural gas properties are recorded. The computation of stock-based compensation expense requires assumptions such as volatility, expected life and the risk-free interest rate. Our liabilities and assets associated with commodity derivatives involve significant assumptions related to volatility and future prices for crude oil and natural gas. It is at least reasonably possible these estimates could be revised in the near term, and these revisions could be material.

        Our estimates of proved reserves materially impact depletion expense. If proved reserves decline, then the rate at which we record depletion expense increases. A decline in estimated proved reserves could result from lower prices, adverse operating results, mechanical problems at our wells and catastrophic events such as explosions, hurricanes and floods. Lower prices also may make it uneconomical to drill wells or produce from fields with high operating costs. In addition, a decline in proved reserves may impact our assessment of our oil and natural gas properties for impairment.

        Our proved reserves estimates are a function of many assumptions, all of which could deviate materially from actual results. As such, reserves estimates may vary materially from the ultimate quantities of crude oil and natural gas actually produced.

Oil and Gas Properties and Equipment

        We follow the successful efforts method of accounting. Exploration expenses, including geological and geophysical expenses and delay rentals, are charged to expense. The costs of drilling and equipping exploratory wells are deferred until the Company has determined whether proved reserves have been

F-66


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)


found. If proved reserves are found, the deferred costs are capitalized as part of the wells and related equipment and facilities. If no proved reserves are found, the deferred costs are charged to expense. All development activity costs are capitalized. We are primarily engaged in the development and acquisition of crude oil and natural gas properties. Our activities are considered development where existing proved reserves are identified prior to commencement of the project and are considered exploration if there are no proved reserves at the beginning of such project. The property costs reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets resulted from acquisition and development activities and deferred exploratory drilling costs. Capitalized overhead costs that directly relate to our drilling and development activities were $1.1 million and $0.8 million, for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. We recorded capitalized interest costs of $1.4 million and $2.5 million for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

        Costs for repairs and maintenance to sustain or increase production from existing producing reservoirs are charged to expense. Significant tangible equipment added or replaced that extends the useful or productive life of the property is capitalized. Costs to construct facilities or increase the productive capacity from existing reservoirs are capitalized.

        Depreciation and depletion of producing properties are computed on the unit-of-production method based on estimated proved oil and natural gas reserves. Our unit-of-production amortization rates are revised prospectively on a quarterly basis based on updated engineering information for our proved developed reserves. Our development costs and lease and wellhead equipment are depleted based on proved developed reserves. Our leasehold costs are depleted based on total proved reserves. Investments in major development projects are not depleted until such project is substantially complete and producing or until impairment occurs. As of June 30, 2009 and 2008, capitalized costs related to waterflood and alkaline-surfactant-polymer ("ASP") projects that were in process and not subject to depletion amounted to $49.4 million and $47.6 million, respectively, of which $4.8 million and $13.3 million, respectively, were deferred costs related to drilling and equipping exploratory wells as discussed in Note 9 below.

        If conditions indicate that long-term assets may be impaired, the carrying value of our properties is compared to management's future estimated pre-tax cash flow from the properties. If undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value, then the asset value is written down to fair value. Impairment of individually significant unproved properties is assessed on a property-by-property basis, and impairment of other unproved properties is assessed and amortized on an aggregate basis. The impairment assessment is affected by factors such as the results of exploration and development activities, commodity price projections, remaining lease terms, and potential shifts in our business strategy.

Asset Retirement Obligation

        Our financial statements reflect the fair value for any asset retirement obligation, consisting of future plugging and abandonment expenditures related to our oil and gas properties, which can be reasonably estimated. The asset retirement obligation is recorded as a liability at its estimated present value at the asset's inception, with an offsetting increase to producing properties on the consolidated balance sheets. Periodic accretion of the discount of the estimated liability is recorded as an expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

F-67


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Goodwill

        The amount paid for certain acquisitions in excess of the fair value of the net assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill in the consolidated balance sheets. Goodwill is not amortized, but is assessed for impairment annually or whenever conditions would indicate impairment may exist. The goodwill impairment analysis is evaluated at the subsidiary level as part of the impairment analysis performed on oil and gas properties, as previously discussed.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

        Cash equivalents are considered to be all highly liquid investments having an original maturity of three months or less. Excess cash funds are generally invested in U.S. government-backed securities. At times, we maintain deposit balances in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits.

Accounts Receivable

        Accounts receivable principally consist of crude oil and natural gas sales proceeds receivable and are typically collected within 35 days from the end of the month in which the related quantities are produced. We require no collateral for such receivables, nor do we charge interest on past due balances. We periodically review accounts receivable for collectability and reduce the carrying amount of the accounts receivable by an allowance. No such allowance was recorded at June 30, 2009 or 2008. As of June 30, 2009, our accounts receivable were primarily with independent purchasers of our crude oil and natural gas production. At June 30, 2009, we had balances due from three customers which were greater than 10% of our accounts receivable related to crude oil and natural gas production. These three customers accounted for 41% (Valero Marketing Supply Co.), 19% (Coffeyville Resources Refinery and Marketing, LLC) and 18% (Plains Marketing, LP) of our accounts receivable, respectively.

        At June 30, 2008, we had balances due from five customers which were greater than 10% of our accounts receivable related to crude oil and natural gas production. These five customers accounted for 29% (Valero Marketing Supply Co.), 17% (Coffeyville Resources Refinery and Marketing, LLC), 15% (Eagle Rock Field Services, LP), 14% (DCP Midstream, LP) and 13% (Plains Marketing, LP) of our accounts receivable, respectively.

        In the event that one or more of these significant customers ceases doing business with us, we believe that there are potential alternative purchasers with whom we could establish new relationships and that those relationships will result in the replacement of one or more lost purchasers. We would not expect the loss of any single purchaser to have a long-term material adverse effect on our operations, though we may experience a short-term decrease in our revenues as we make arrangements for alternative purchasers. However, the loss of a single purchaser could potentially reduce the competition for our crude oil and natural gas production, which could negatively impact the prices we receive.

Revenue Recognition

        Our revenue recognition is based on the sales method. We do not have imbalances for natural gas sales. We recognize revenue when crude oil and natural gas quantities are delivered to or collected by

F-68


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)


the respective purchaser. Title to the produced quantities transfers to the purchaser at the time the purchaser receives or collects the quantities. Prices for such production are defined in sales contracts and are readily determinable based on publicly available information. The purchasers of such production have historically made payment for crude oil and natural gas purchases within thirty-five days of the end of each production month. We periodically review the difference between the dates of production and the dates we collect payment for such production to ensure that accounts receivable from the purchasers are collectible. The point of sale for our crude oil and natural gas production is at our applicable field tank batteries and gathering systems; therefore, we do not incur transportation costs related to our sales of crude oil and natural gas production.

        As previously discussed, for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we sold our crude oil and natural gas production to several independent purchasers. The following table shows purchasers that accounted for 10% or more of our total operating revenues:

 
  Year Ended June 30,  
 
  2009   2008   2007  

Valero Marketing Supply Co. 

    32 %   33 %   36 %

Coffeeville Resources Refinery and Marketing, LLC

    18 %   15 %   16 %

Plains Marketing, LP

    15 %   *     *  

Eagle Rock Field Services, LP

    13 %   18 %   18 %

DCP Midstream, LP

    10 %   14 %   17 %

*
Less than 10% of operating revenue

Oil and Gas Sales Payable

        Our accounts receivable includes amounts that we collect from the purchasers of our crude oil and natural gas sales on behalf of us, and certain working interest and royalty owners. The portion of accounts receivable that pertains to us is recognized as operating revenue. The portion that pertains to certain working interest and royalty owners are recorded as oil and gas sales payable.

Inventory

        Our inventory consists of unsold barrels of crude oil remaining in our storage tanks at the end of the period. We value these crude oil barrels based on the lower of market or our average production cost.

Income Taxes

        Deferred tax assets or liabilities are recognized for the anticipated future tax effects of temporary differences between the financial statement basis and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities. These balances are measured using tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is recorded when it is more likely than not that the benefit from the deferred tax asset will not be realized.

F-69


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

        As of June 30, 2008, the adoption of FIN 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109" ("FIN 48") did not materially affect our operating results, financial position, or cash flows. As of June 30, 2009, we have not recorded any accruals for uncertain tax positions. We are not involved in any examinations by the Internal Revenue Service. For Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico and U.S. federal purposes, the review of our income tax returns is open for examination by the related taxing authorities for the tax years of 2004 through 2008.

Financial Instruments

        The carrying amounts of financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value, unless otherwise stated, as of June 30, 2009 and 2008. The carrying amount of long-term debt approximates market value due to the use of market interest rates.

Net Income (Loss) per Common Share

        Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed in the same manner as basic net income (loss) per common share, but also considers the effect of common stock shares underlying the following:

 
  Year Ended June 30,  
 
  2009   2008   2007  

Stock options (Note 10)

    1,400,002     1,084,051     801,513  

Warrants

            1,646,061  

Preferred Stock (Note 5)

    4,147,652     7,734,609     8,541,913  

Paid-in-kind dividends ("PIK") (Note 5)

    545,773     674,569     303,813  

Non-vested restricted shares (Note 11)

    480,000     1,005,000     95,000  

        The shares of common stock underlying the stock options, warrants, Preferred Stock, PIK dividends and non-vested restricted shares, as shown in the preceding table, are not included in weighted average shares outstanding for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 or 2007 as their effects would be anti-dilutive.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

        We account for share-based payment arrangements with employees and directors at their grant-date fair value and record the related expense over their respective service periods. The value of stock-based compensation is impacted by our stock price, which has been highly volatile, and items that require management's judgment, such as expected lives and forfeiture rates.

Derivatives

        We are required to hedge a portion of our production at specified prices for oil and natural gas under our senior and subordinated credit agreements, as discussed in Note 6. The purpose of the derivatives is to reduce our exposure to declining commodity prices. By locking in minimum prices, we protect our cash flows which support our annual capital expenditure plans. We have entered into commodity derivatives that involve "costless collars" for our crude oil and natural gas sales. These

F-70


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)


derivatives are recorded as derivative assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets based upon their respective fair values. We have entered into an interest rate basis swap contract to reduce our exposure to future interest rate increases.

        We do not designate our derivatives as cash flow or fair value hedges. We do not hold or issue derivatives for speculative or trading purposes. We are exposed to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to our commodity and interest rate swap derivatives. We anticipate, however, that our counterparties will be able to fully satisfy their respective obligations under our commodity and interest rate swap derivatives contracts. We do not obtain collateral or other security to support our commodity derivatives contracts nor are we required to post any collateral. We monitor the credit standing of our counterparties to understand our credit risk.

        Changes in the fair values of our derivative instruments and cash flows resulting from the settlement of our derivative instruments are recorded in earnings as gains or losses on derivatives on our consolidated statements of operations.

Comprehensive Income

        We had no elements of comprehensive income other than net loss for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007.

New Accounting Pronouncements

        In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations ("SFAS No. 141R"). Among other things, SFAS No. 141R establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer in a business combination (i) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquired business, (ii) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase, and (iii) determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141R is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. We adopted SFAS No. 141R on July 1, 2009. This standard will change our accounting treatment for prospective business combinations.

        In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51 ("SFAS No. 160"). SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. It also establishes a single method of accounting for changes in a parent's ownership interest in a subsidiary and requires expanded disclosures. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. We adopted SFAS No. 160 on July 1, 2009. We do not expect the adoption of this statement will have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—An Amendment of FASB Statement 133 ("SFAS No. 161"). SFAS No. 161 amends and expands SFAS No. 133 to expand required disclosures to discuss the uses of derivative instruments;

F-71


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)


the accounting for derivative instruments and related hedged items under SFAS No. 133; and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect the company's financial position, financial performance and cash flows. We adopted SFAS No. 161 on July 1, 2009. We do not expect the adoption of this statement to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In June 2008, the FASB issued EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities ("FSP 03-6-1"). FSP 03-6-1 addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and need to be included in the calculation of earnings per share under the two-class method described in SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share. Under FSP 03-6-1, share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are "participating securities" as defined by EITF 03-6, Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128, and therefore should be included in computing earnings per share using the two-class method. FSP 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008. We adopted FSP 03-6-1 on July 1, 2009. The effect of adopting FSP 03-6-1 will increase the number of shares used to compute earnings per share; however, we do not expect the adoption of FSP 03-6-1 to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In December 2008, the FASB issued EITF 07-5, Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity's Own Stock ("EITF 07-5"). EITF 07-5 affects companies that have provisions in their securities purchase agreements (for warrants and convertible instruments) that reset issuance/conversion prices based upon new issuances by companies at prices below the exercise price of said instrument. Warrants and convertible instruments with such provisions will require the embedded derivative instrument to be bifurcated and separately accounted for as a derivative under SFAS No. 133. Subject to certain exceptions, our Preferred Stock provides for resetting the conversion price if we issue new common stock below $5.75 per share. EITF is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008. We adopted EITF 07-5 on July 1, 2009. We do not expect the adoption of this statement to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Had we adopted EITF 07-5 on June 30, 2009, we estimate that we would have reduced our temporary equity by approximately $0.7 million to $1.0 million and recorded a derivative liability for the same $0.7 million to $1.0 million amount, which would be marked-to-market for future reporting periods.

        In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 165, Subsequent Events ("SFAS 165") to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date, but prior to the issuance of financial statements. Specifically, SFAS 165 sets forth: (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; (2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and (3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. SFAS 165 is effective for financial statements issued for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted SFAS 165 on June 30, 2009 and considered subsequent events through September 28, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

F-72


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

        In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 168, Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("SFAS 168"). SFAS 168 replaces SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principle. SFAS 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the sole source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by all nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally acceptable accounting principles. SFAS 168 is effective for financial statements for interim and annual periods ending on or after September 15, 2009. We adopted SFAS 168 on July 1, 2009. We do not expect the adoption of this statement to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

4. COMMON STOCK FINANCINGS

Common Stock Issuance Completed July 1, 2008

        On July 1, 2008, we completed the sale of 7.0 million shares of our common stock through an underwritten offering at a price of $8.00 per share ($7.75 net to us) resulting in net proceeds of approximately $53.9 million after underwriting discounts, commissions and expenses. We used the net proceeds from the offering to pay down debt. We subsequently made borrowings against our borrowing base in order to finance our development activities in certain core areas such as the Panhandle and Cato Properties and general corporate purposes.

Private Placement

        On November 7, 2007, we sold 3.5 million shares of our common stock in a private placement at a price of $7.15 per share for net proceeds of $23.4 million after deducting issuance costs of $1.6 million. The net proceeds were used to pay down long-term debt due under our senior credit agreement.

        In connection with the private placement, we entered into a registration rights agreement with the purchasers in such private placement which required us to file a registration statement within a certain period of time and have it declared effective within a certain period of time. We met both of these deadlines. However, if we are not able to maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement, subject to certain limitations, we will have to pay 1.0% of the aggregate purchase price of the securities purchased in the private placement on the first day of such initial maintenance failure and on each 30th day after the day of such initial maintenance failure (prorated for periods totaling less than 30 days), with the maximum aggregate registration delay payments being 10% of the aggregate purchase price. We do not believe it is probable we will incur any penalties under this provision and accordingly have not accrued any loss.

5. PREFERRED STOCK

        On September 6, 2006, we sold $49.1 million of Preferred Stock. We were required to file a registration statement on Form S-1 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") registering the resale of the common shares underlying the Preferred Stock, which was filed on October 13, 2006 and was declared effective on January 4, 2007. On April 9, 2007, we also filed to register these same common shares on a registration statement on Form S-3, which was declared effective on April 19, 2007. We are required to maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement until such common shares may be resold pursuant to Rule 144(k) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or all such common shares have been resold subject to certain exceptions, and if the

F-73


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

5. PREFERRED STOCK (Continued)


effectiveness is not maintained, then we must pay 1.5% of the gross proceeds and an additional 1.5% for every 30 days it is not maintained. The maximum aggregate of all registration delay payments is 10% of the gross proceeds from the September 2006 offering. We do not believe it is probable we will incur any penalties under this provision and accordingly have not accrued any loss.

        The Preferred Stock has a 7.875% dividend and features a paid-in-kind ("PIK") provision that allows the investor, at its option, to receive additional shares of common stock upon conversion for the dividend in lieu of a cash dividend payment. Once the investor has chosen the PIK or cash distribution, all future distribution will follow the same choice. As of June 30, 2009, approximately 59% of the Preferred Stock dividends were PIK. The Preferred Stock is convertible at the holder's option to common stock at a price of $5.75 per share. If any Preferred Stock remains outstanding on September 6, 2011, we are required to redeem the Preferred Stock for a redemption amount in cash equal to the stated value of the Preferred Stock, plus accrued dividends and PIK dividends. The issuance of Preferred Stock is accounted for as temporary equity since the holder can request redemption for cash under certain circumstances.

        Pursuant to the terms of the Preferred Stock and subject to certain exceptions, if we issue or sell common stock at a price less than the conversion price (currently $5.75 per share) in effect immediately prior to such issuance or sale, the conversion price shall be reduced. If such an issuance is made, the conversion price will be lowered to the weighted average price of (x) the total common shares outstanding prior to said issuance multiplied by $5.75 and (y) the new shares issued at the new issuance price. The above described adjustment is not triggered by issuances or sales involving the following: (i) shares issued in connection with an employee benefit plan; (ii) shares issued upon conversion of our Preferred Stock; (iii) shares issued in connection with a firm commitment underwritten public offering with gross proceeds in excess of $50,000,000; (iv) shares issued in connection with any strategic acquisition or transaction; (v) shares issued in connection with any options or convertible securities that were outstanding on August 25, 2006; or (vi) shares issued in connection with any stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization or similar transaction.

        Each holder of Preferred Stock is entitled to the whole number of votes equal to the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion. The Preferred Stock shall vote as a class with the holders of the common stock as if they were a single class of securities upon any matter submitted to the vote of the stockholders except those matters required by law or the terms of the Preferred Stock to be submitted to a class vote of the holders of the Preferred Stock, in which case the holders of the Preferred Stock only shall vote as a separate class.

        Upon a voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Cano or such subsidiaries of Cano the assets of which constitute all or substantially all of the assets of the business of Cano and its subsidiaries taken as a whole, the holders of our Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive an amount per share equal to $1,000 plus dividends owed on such share prior to any payments being made to any class of capital stock ranking junior on liquidation to the Preferred Stock.

        At June 30, 2009, 26,987 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock remain outstanding (including 3,138 shares from PIK dividends). At June 30, 2008, there were 48,353 shares of our Preferred Stock outstanding, including 3,879 shares from PIK dividends. During November and December 2008, we repurchased 22,948 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, including accrued dividends and 2,323 shares from PIK dividends for approximately $10.4 million.

F-74


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

5. PREFERRED STOCK (Continued)

        For the year ended June 30, 2009, the preferred dividend was $2.7 million, of which $1.6 million were PIK dividends. For the twelve months ended June 30, 2008, the preferred dividend was $4.1 million, of which $2.1 million were PIK dividends.

        At June 30, 2009, the Preferred Stock and cumulative PIK dividends were convertible into 4,147,652 and 545,773 shares, respectively, of our common stock at a conversion price of $5.75 per share.

6. LONG-TERM DEBT

        At June 30, 2009 and 2008, the outstanding amount due under our credit agreements was $55.7 million and $73.5 million, respectively. The $55.7 million at June 30, 2009, consisted of outstanding borrowings under the senior and subordinated credit agreements of $40.7 million and $15.0 million, respectively. At June 30, 2009, the average interest rates under the senior and subordinated credit agreements were 2.88% and 6.62%, respectively.

        Our long-term debt consists of our senior credit facility (current borrowing base of $60.0 million) and our subordinated credit agreement ($15.0 million availability), which are discussed in greater detail below.

Senior Credit Agreement

        On December 17, 2008, we finalized a new $120.0 million Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the "ARCA") with Union Bank of North America, N.A. ("UBNA", f/k/a Union Bank of California, N.A.) and Natixis. UBNA is the Administrative Agent and Issuing Lender of the ARCA. The initial and current borrowing base, based upon our proved reserves, is $60.0 million. Pursuant to the terms of the ARCA, the borrowing base is to be redetermined based upon our reserves at June 30, 2009. Thereafter, there will be a scheduled redetermination every six months with one interim, additional redetermination allowed during any six month period between scheduled redeterminations at either the option of our lenders or us.

        At our option, interest is either (i) the sum of (a) the UBNA reference rate and (b) the applicable margin of (1) 0.875% if less than 50% of the borrowing base is borrowed, (2) 1.125% if at least 50% but less than 75% of the borrowing base is borrowed, (3) 1.375% if at least 75% but less than 90% of the borrowing base is borrowed or (4) 1.625% if at least 90% of the borrowing base is borrowed; or (ii) the sum of (a) the one, two, three, six, nine or twelve month LIBOR rate (at our option) and (b) the applicable margin of (1) 2.0% if less than 50% of the borrowing base is borrowed, (2) 2.25% if at least 50% but less than 75% of the borrowing base is borrowed, (3) 2.50% if at least 75% but less than 90% of the borrowing base is borrowed or (4) 2.75% if at least 90% of the borrowing base is borrowed. We owe a commitment fee on the unborrowed portion of the borrowing base of 0.375% per annum if less than 90% of the borrowing base is borrowed and 0.50% per annum if at least 90% of the borrowing base is borrowed.

        Unless specific events of default occur, the maturity date of the ARCA is December 17, 2012. Specific events of default which could cause all outstanding principal and accrued interest to be accelerated, include, but are not limited to, payment defaults, material breaches of representations and warranties, breaches of covenants, certain cross-defaults, insolvency, a change in control or a material adverse change.

F-75


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

6. LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

        The ARCA contains certain negative covenants including, subject to certain exceptions, covenants against the following: (i) incurring additional liens, (ii) incurring additional debt or issuing additional equity interests other than common equity interests; (iii) merging or consolidating or selling, leasing, transferring, assigning, farming-out, conveying or otherwise disposing of any property, (iv) making certain payments, including cash dividends to our common stockholders, (v) making any loans, advances or capital contributions to, or making any investment in, or purchasing or committing to purchase any stock or other securities or evidences of indebtedness or interest in any person or oil and gas properties or activities related to oil and gas properties unless (a) with regard to new oil and gas properties, such properties are mortgaged to UBNA, as administrative agent, or (b) with regard to new subsidiaries, such subsidiaries execute a guaranty, pledge agreement, security agreement or mortgage in favor of UBNA, as administrative agent, and (vi) entering into affiliate transactions on terms that are not at least as favorable to us as comparable arm's length transactions.

Subordinated Credit Agreement

        On September 30, 2008, we paid off the entire outstanding $15.0 million principal due under the then existing subordinated credit agreement, interest expense and a prepayment premium of $0.3 million. In conjunction with the payoff, we terminated that subordinated credit agreement.

        On December 17, 2008, we finalized a new $25.0 million Subordinated Credit Agreement among Cano, the lenders and UnionBanCal Equities, Inc ("UBE") as Administrative Agent (the "Subordinated Credit Agreement"). On March 17, 2009, we borrowed the maximum available amount of $15.0 million under this agreement and paid down outstanding senior debt under the ARCA. An additional $10.0 million could be made available at the lender's sole discretion.

        The interest rate is the sum of (a) the one, two, three, six, nine or twelve month LIBOR rate (at our option) and (b) 6.0%. Through March 17, 2009, we owed a commitment fee of 1.0% on the unborrowed portion of the available borrowing amount. As of March 17, 2009, we no longer have a commitment fee since we borrowed the full $15.0 million available amount.

        Unless specific events of default occur, the maturity date is June 17, 2013. Specific events of default which could cause all outstanding principal and accrued interest to be accelerated, include, but are not limited to, payment defaults, material breaches of representations and warranties, breaches of covenants, certain cross-defaults, insolvency, a change in control or a material adverse change as defined in the Subordinated Credit Agreement.

        The Subordinated Credit Agreement contains certain negative covenants including, subject to certain exceptions, covenants against the following: (i) incurring additional liens, (ii) incurring additional debt or issuing additional equity interests other than common equity interests of Cano; (iii) merging or consolidating or selling, leasing, transferring, assigning, farming-out, conveying or otherwise disposing of any property, (iv) making certain payments, including cash dividends to our common stockholders, (v) making any loans, advances or capital contributions to, or making any investment in, or purchasing or committing to purchase any stock or other securities or evidences of indebtedness or interest in any person or oil and gas properties or activities related to oil and gas properties unless (a) with regard to new oil and gas properties, such properties are mortgaged to UBE, as administrative agent, or (b) with regard to new subsidiaries, such subsidiaries execute a guaranty, pledge agreement, security agreement or mortgage in favor of UBE, as administrative agent, and

F-76


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

6. LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)


(vi) entering into affiliate transactions on terms that are not at least as favorable to us as comparable arm's length transactions.

7. DERIVATIVES

        Our derivatives consist of commodity derivatives and an interest rate swap arrangement, which are discussed in greater detail below.

Commodity Derivatives

        Pursuant to our senior and subordinated credit agreements discussed in Note 6, we are required to maintain our existing commodity derivative contracts, all of which have UBNA as our counterparty. We have no obligation to enter into commodity derivative contracts in the future. Should we choose to enter into commodity derivative contracts to mitigate future price risk, we cannot enter into contracts for greater than 85% of our crude oil and natural gas production volumes attributable to proved producing reserves for a given month. As of June 30, 2009, we maintained the following commodity derivative contracts:

Time Period
  Floor
Oil Price
  Ceiling
Oil Price
  Barrels
Per Day
  Floor
Gas Price
  Ceiling
Gas Price
  Mcf
per Day
  Barrels of
Equivalent
Oil per Day(a)
 

7/1/09 - 12/31/09

  $ 80.00   $ 110.90     367   $ 7.75   $ 10.60     1,667     644  

7/1/09 - 12/31/09

  $ 85.00   $ 104.40     233   $ 8.00   $ 10.15     1,133     422  

1/1/10 - 12/31/10

  $ 80.00   $ 108.20     333   $ 7.75   $ 9.85     1,567     594  

1/1/10 - 12/31/10

  $ 85.00   $ 101.50     233   $ 8.00   $ 9.40     1,033     406  

1/1/11 - 3/31/11

  $ 80.00   $ 107.30     333   $ 7.75   $ 11.60     1,467     578  

1/1/11 - 3/31/11

  $ 85.00   $ 100.50     200   $ 8.00   $ 11.05     967     361  

(a)
This column is computed by dividing the "Mcf per Day" by 6 and adding "Barrels per Day."

        During October 2008, we sold certain uncovered "floor price" commodity derivative contracts for the period July 2010 to December 2010 for $0.6 million to our counterparty and realized a gain of $0.1 million. During November 2008, we sold all remaining uncovered "floor price" commodity derivative contracts for the period November 2008 through June 2010 for $2.6 million to our counterparty and realized a gain of $0.6 million.

        On September 11, 2009, we entered into two fixed price commodity swap contracts with our counterparty—Natixis, which is one of our lenders under the senior credit agreement. The fixed price swaps are based on West Texas Intermediate NYMEX prices and are summarized in the table below.

Time Period
  Fixed
Oil Price
  Barrels
Per Day
 

4/1/11 - 12/31/11

  $ 75.90     700  

1/1/12 - 12/31/12

  $ 77.25     700  

        Many reference sources are available to gauge market terms for derivative contracts. Cano considers market terms from various sources prior to entering into a derivative contract. Cano believes that the terms of the above commodity derivatives are similar to terms they could have reached with

F-77


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

7. DERIVATIVES (Continued)

unrelated third party companies. As of September 11, 2009, Cano had commodity derivatives with UBNA and Natixis, as presented above. As these counterparties are also lenders under Cano's senior credit facility, Cano is not required to post collateral to secure the commodity derivatives commitments.

Interest Rate Swap Agreement

        On January 12, 2009, we entered into a three-year LIBOR interest rate basis swap contract with Natixis Financial Products, Inc. ("Natixis FPI") for $20.0 million in notional exposure. Under the terms of the transaction, we will pay Natixis FPI, in three-month intervals, a fixed rate of 1.73% and Natixis FPI will pay Cano the prevailing three-month LIBOR rate. We do not designate this interest rate swap contract as either a cash flow or fair value hedge.

Financial Statement Impact

        During the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, the gain (loss) on derivatives reported in our consolidated statements of operations is summarized as follows:

 
  Year Ended June 30,  
 
  2009   2008   2007  

Settlements received/accrued

  $ 6,840   $ 504   $ 963  

Settlements received—sale of "floor price" contracts

    653          

Settlements paid/accrued

    (603 )   (3,089 )    
               

Realized gain (loss) on derivatives

    6,890     (2,585 )   963  

Unrealized gain (loss) on commodity derivatives

    36,849     (29,370 )   (1,810 )

Unrealized gain on interest rate swap

    51          
               

Gain (loss) on derivatives

  $ 43,790   $ (31,955 ) $ (847 )
               

        The realized gain (loss) on derivatives consists of actual cash settlements under our commodity collars and interest rate swap derivatives during the respective periods, and the sale of "floor price" commodity derivative contracts during October and November 2008. The cash settlements received/accrued by us under commodity derivatives were cumulative monthly payments due to us since the NYMEX natural gas and crude oil prices were lower than the "floor prices" set for the respective time periods and realized gains from the sale of uncovered "floor price" contracts as previously discussed. The cash settlements paid/accrued by us under commodity derivatives were cumulative monthly payments due to our counterparty since the NYMEX crude oil and natural gas prices were higher than the "ceiling prices" set for the respective time periods. The cash settlements paid/accrued by us under the interest rate swap were quarterly payments to our counterparty since the actual three-month LIBOR interest rate was lower than the fixed 1.73% rate we pay to the counterparty. The cash flows relating to the derivative instrument settlements that are due, but not cash settled are reflected in operating activities on our consolidated statements of cash flows as changes to current liabilities. At June 30, 2009, we had recorded a $0.6 million receivable from our counterparty included in accounts receivable on our consolidated balance sheet. At June 30, 2008, we had recorded a $1.2 million payable to our counterparty included in accounts payable on our consolidated balance sheet.

        The unrealized gain (loss) on commodity derivatives represents estimated future settlements under our commodity derivatives and is based on mark-to-market valuation based on assumptions of forward

F-78


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

7. DERIVATIVES (Continued)


prices, volatility and the time value of money as discussed in Note 13. We compared our valuation to our counterparties' independently derived valuation to further validate our mark-to-market valuation. During the year ended June 30, 2009, we recognized an unrealized gain on commodity derivatives in our consolidated statements of operations amounting to $36.8 million. During the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we recognized an unrealized loss on commodity derivatives in our consolidated statements of operations amounting to $29.4 million and $1.8 million, respectively.

        The unrealized gain on interest rate swap represents estimated future settlements under our aforementioned interest rate swap agreement and is based on a mark-to-market valuation based on assumptions of interest rates, volatility and the time value of money as discussed in Note 13. We compared our valuation to our counterparties' independently derived valuation to further validate our mark-to-market valuation. During the year ended June 30, 2009, we recognized an unrealized gain on interest rate swaps in our consolidated statements of operations amounting to $0.1 million. Since we did not implement the interest rate swap until January 2009, we did not have unrealized gain or loss on the interest rate swap during the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.

        As of June 30, 2009, we had aggregate derivative commodity assets of $7.6 million and a net derivative asset for the interest rate swap of $0.1 million. These amounts are based on our mark-to-market valuation of these derivatives at June 30, 2009 and may not be indicative of actual future cash settlements.

8. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

        On October 1, 2008, we completed the sale of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Pantwist, LLC, for a net purchase price of $40.0 million consisting of a $42.7 million purchase price adjusted for $2.1 million of net cash received from discontinued operations during the three months ended September 30, 2008 and $0.6 million of advisory fees. The sale had an effective date of July 1, 2008. At October 1, 2008, we recorded a pre-tax gain associated with the sale, exclusive of discontinued operating income, of approximately $19.2 million ($12.2 million after-tax). All current tax liabilities associated with such gain were offset by existing net operating losses. We used the entire $42.1 million net cash proceeds received from the transaction and cash on hand to pay down amounts outstanding under our senior credit agreement on October 1, 2008.

        On December 2, 2008, we sold our interests in our Corsicana oil and gas properties (the "Corsicana Properties") for $0.3 million. In the quarter ended September 30, 2008, we recorded a $3.5 million ($2.3 million after-tax) impairment of the Corsicana Properties, as we determined that we would not be developing its proved undeveloped reserves within the next five years.

        On June 11, 2007, pursuant to the terms of an Agreement for Purchase and Sale, we sold our interests in the Rich Valley Properties located in Oklahoma and Kansas to Anadarko Minerals, Inc. for net proceeds of $6.8 million. The agreement had an effective date of April 1, 2007. The funds received were used to reduce long-term debt.

F-79


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

8. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (Continued)

        The operating results of Pantwist, LLC, Corsicana Properties and the Rich Valley Properties for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 have been reclassified as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations as detailed in the table below.

 
  For the Year Ended June 30,  
In Thousands
  2009   2008   2007  

Operating Revenues:

                   
 

Crude oil sales

  $ 1,321   $ 4,461   $ 3,715  
 

Natural gas sales

    1,757     5,552     5,397  
               
   

Total operating revenues

    3,078     10,013     9,112  
               

Operating Expenses:

                   
 

Lease operating

    638     2,248     2,700  
 

Production and ad valorem taxes

    197     900     869  
 

General and administrative

        24     280  
 

Impairment of long-lived assets

    3,516          
 

Depletion and depreciation

    15     1,106     1,223  
 

Accretion of discount on asset retirement obligations

    3     15     23  
 

Interest expense, net

    34     220     776  
               
   

Total operating expenses

    4,403     4,513     5,871  
               

Gain (loss) on sale of properties

    19,246     (76 )   3,811  
               

Income before income taxes

    17,921     5,424     7,052  

Income tax provision

    (6,441 )   (1,953 )   (2,539 )
               

Income from discontinued operations

  $ 11,480   $ 3,471   $ 4,513  
               

        Interest expense, net of interest income, was allocated to discontinued operations based on the percent of operating revenues applicable to discontinued operations to the total operating revenues.

        At June 30, 2008, on our consolidated balance sheet, the assets of Pantwist, LLC and assets relating to the Corsicana Properties are classified as assets held for sale and the liabilities are classified as liabilities associated with discontinued operations.

9. COSTS INCURRED FOR DRILLING AND EQUIPPING EXPLORATORY WELLS USING SECONDARY AND TERTIARY TECHNOLOGY

        As part of our growth strategy, we incur costs associated with secondary and tertiary techniques that involve drilling and equipping exploratory wells. This occurs within reservoirs for which we already have proved developed reserves recorded from existing primary or secondary development; however, there are no proved reserves for subsequent secondary or tertiary activities. Secondary and tertiary costs for drilling and equipping wells include converting primary production wells to injection wells, installation of injection facilities, and injecting materials. When conducting secondary and tertiary drilling and equipping activities, we defer drilling and equipping costs associated with these exploratory wells pending a determination of whether proved reserves are found. If proved reserves are not found, all of the costs associated with the project are recorded as exploration expense in the period in which such determination is made. If proved reserves are found, the drilling and equipping costs incurred in

F-80


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

9. COSTS INCURRED FOR DRILLING AND EQUIPPING EXPLORATORY WELLS USING SECONDARY AND TERTIARY TECHNOLOGY (Continued)


the project are added to the depletion base and depreciated using the units of production method based over the production life of the associated proved developed reserves.

        At June 30, 2009, there is one tertiary project (the Nowata ASP flood), that is pending the determination of whether proved reserves have been found. Secondary and tertiary projects typically take longer to complete than drilling primary production wells, and as a result, the period during which exploratory drilling costs are deferred is longer. The table below summarizes the drilling and equipping costs incurred and deferred related to secondary and tertiary projects at June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, that are pending the determination of whether proved reserves have been found.

 
  June 30,  
In Thousands
  2009   2008   2007  

Secondary—Duke Sands

  $   $ 9,857   $ 5,824  

Tertiary—Nowata ASP Pilot

    4,849     3,216     814  
               

Total Costs

  $ 4,849   $ 13,073   $ 6,638  
               

        The following table provides an aging of deferred exploratory well costs based on the date the project was initiated (prior to determination of success).

 
  June 30,  
In Thousands
  2009   2008   2007  

Capitalized exploratory well costs that have been capitalized period of one year or less

  $ 1,633   $ 6,435   $ 5,420  

Capitalized exploratory well costs that have been capitalized period of one to three years

    3,216     6,638     1,218  
               

Balance at June 30

  $ 4,849   $ 13,073   $ 6,638  
               

Number of projects that have exploratory well costs that have been capitalized for a period of one to three years

    1     2     2  

        Our secondary and tertiary projects are evaluated to determine whether they have found proved reserves when the project is substantially complete. We consider a secondary or tertiary project to be substantially complete when the amount of material injected reaches our target pore volume injection ("PVI") percentage determined necessary to stimulate response. Our two projects are the Duke Sands waterflood at our Desdemona Properties and the ASP tertiary recovery pilot project at the Nowata Properties. As of June 30, 2009, the Nowata ASP project was not complete, and as such, all of the associated drilling and equipping costs to date have been deferred. The Nowata ASP project is expected to take an additional three to six months before the final polymer flush is complete and the response can be evaluated. It is anticipated that an additional $0.3 million will be required to complete this project.

        Regarding the Duke Sands project, the primary source of water for this waterflood project had been derived from our Barnett Shale production. Since we have shut-in our Barnett Shale natural gas production due to uneconomic natural gas commodity prices, as previously discussed, we no longer have an economic source of water to continue flooding the Duke Sands. Therefore, our rate of water

F-81


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

9. COSTS INCURRED FOR DRILLING AND EQUIPPING EXPLORATORY WELLS USING SECONDARY AND TERTIARY TECHNOLOGY (Continued)


injection has been reduced to a point where we cannot consider the waterflood active. We have recorded exploration expense of $11.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2009. For the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, we incurred no costs associated with exploration expenses such as geological and geophysical expenses and delay rentals.

        The following table reflects the net change in deferred exploratory project costs during fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007:

 
  Year ended June 30,  
In Thousands
  2009   2008   2007  

Balance at July 1

  $ 13,073   $ 6,638   $ 1,218  
 

Additions pending the determination of proved reserves

    3,155     6,435     5,420  
 

Deferred exploratory well costs charged to expense

    (11,379 )        
               

Balance at June 30

  $ 4,849   $ 13,073   $ 6,638  
               

10. STOCK OPTIONS

        We have granted stock options to our employees and outside directors as discussed below.

Prior to our 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan

        On December 16, 2004, we issued stock options for 50,000 shares of our common stock to Gerald Haddock, a former member of our board of directors, in exchange for certain financial and management consulting services at an exercise price of $4.00 per share. The options are exercisable at any time, in whole or in part, during the life of the option which expires on June 15, 2015.

        On April 1, 2005, we adopted the 2005 Directors' Stock Option Plan ("Plan"). On April 1, 2005, pursuant to the Plan, we granted stock options to our five non-employee directors to each purchase 25,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.13 per share. The options vested on April 1, 2006, and expire on April 1, 2015. During the year ended June 30, 2008, 50,000 options shares were exercised, 25,000 option shares were forfeited and the outstanding vested options totaled 50,000 shares.

2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan

        Our 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "2005 LTIP"), as approved by our stockholders, authorized the issuance of up to 3,500,000 shares of our common stock to key employees, consultants and outside directors of our company and subsidiaries. The 2005 LTIP stipulates that for any calendar year (i) the maximum number of stock options or stock appreciation rights that any Executive Officer (as defined in the Plan) can receive is 300,000 shares of common stock, (ii) the maximum number of shares relating to restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance awards or other awards that are subject to the attainment of performance goals that any Executive Officer can receive is 300,000 shares of common stock; and (iii) the maximum number of shares relating to all awards that an Executive Officer can receive is 300,000 shares. The 2005 LTIP permits the grant of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance awards, dividend equivalent rights and other awards, whether granted singly, in

F-82


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

10. STOCK OPTIONS (Continued)


combination or in tandem. The 2005 LTIP terminates on December 7, 2015; however, awards granted before that date will continue to be effective in accordance with their terms and conditions.

        Stock option awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to our market price at the date of grant and have 10-year contractual terms. Stock option awards to employees generally vest over three years of continuous service. Stock option awards to directors generally vest immediately or in one year. On June 28, 2007, we resolved that upon the resignation of any current member of the Board of Directors who is in good standing on the date of resignation, such member's unvested stock options shall be vested and shall have the exercise period for all options extended to twenty-four months after the date of resignation. The grant-date fair value of director options for which vesting was accelerated during the year ended June 30, 2008 amounted to approximately $31,000. Such amount is included in general and administrative expense on our consolidated statements of operations. There were no options for which vesting was accelerated during the years ended June 30, 2009 or 2007.

        A summary of options we granted during the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:

 
  Shares   Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 

Outstanding at July 1, 2006

    577,185   $ 5.66  

Options granted

    564,303   $ 5.37  

Options forfeited or expired

    (314,975 ) $ 6.21  

Options exercised

    (25,000 ) $ 4.13  
           

Outstanding at June 30, 2007

    801,513   $ 5.29  

Options granted

    398,941   $ 6.48  

Options forfeited or expired

    (41,403 ) $ 5.76  

Options exercised

    (75,000 ) $ 5.28  
           

Outstanding at June 30, 2008

    1,084,051   $ 5.71  

Options granted

    577,900   $ 1.87  

Options forfeited or expired

    (261,949 ) $ 3.93  
           

Outstanding at June 30, 2009

    1,400,002   $ 4.42  
           

F-83


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

10. STOCK OPTIONS (Continued)

        The following is a summary of stock options outstanding at June 30, 2009:

 
 
Exercise
Price
  Options
Outstanding
  Remaining
Contractual
Lives (Years)
  Options
Exercisable
   
    $ 0.43     276,346     9.41     200,675    
    $ 0.60     7,600     9.34        
    $ 0.70     3,500     9.86        
    $ 3.19     6,100     9.20        
    $ 3.27     3,000     9.15        
    $ 3.98     161,646     9.08     62,175    
    $ 4.00     50,000     5.47     50,000    
    $ 4.13     25,000     5.76     25,000    
    $ 4.73     61,803     7.77     61,803    
    $ 5.15     81,435     6.98     81,435    
    $ 5.42     276,667     7.50     213,333    
    $ 5.75     163,400     8.65     23,999    
    $ 5.95     10,000     8.21        
    $ 6.15     32,800     8.01        
    $ 6.30     75,000     6.46     75,000    
    $ 7.25     150,000     8.46     150,000    
    $ 7.47     15,705     8.42        
                     
    $ 4.42     1,400,002     8.17     943,420    
                     

        Based on our $0.95 stock price at June 30, 2009, the intrinsic value of the "in-the-money" options was $0.1 million for each of the outstanding options and the exercisable options.

        Total options exercisable at June 30, 2009 amounted to 943,420 shares and had a weighted average exercise price of $4.46. Upon exercise, we issue the full amount of shares exercisable per the terms of the options from new shares. We have no plans to repurchase those shares in the future.

        The following is a summary of options exercisable at June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007:

 
  Shares   Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 

June 30, 2009

    943,420   $ 4.46  

June 30, 2008

    561,803   $ 5.75  

June 30, 2007

    250,000   $ 5.19  

        The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of our common stock. We use historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination within the valuation model. The expected lives of options granted represent the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the five-year U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected dividend yield reflects our intent not to pay dividends on our common stock during the contractual periods.

F-84


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

10. STOCK OPTIONS (Continued)

        The fair values of options granted along with the factors used to calculate the fair values of those options are summarized in the table below:

 
  Years Ended June 30,  
 
  2009   2008   2007  

No. of shares

    577,900     398,941     564,303  

Risk free interest rate

    2.15-3.39 %   2.93-4.07 %   4.56-4.91 %

Expected life

    5 years     5 years     4 years  

Expected volatility

    56.3-90.1 %   49.1-49.7 %   50.5-53.4 %

Expected dividend yield

    0 %   0 %   0 %

Weighted average grant date fair value—exercise prices equal to market value on grant date

  $ 0.99   $ 3.18   $ 2.64  

Weighted average grant date fair value—exercise prices greater than market value on grant date

      $   $ 2.44  

Weighted average grant date fair value—exercise prices less than market value on grant date

  $   $   $  

        For the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we have recorded a charge to stock compensation expense of $0.7 million, $1.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively, for the estimated fair value of the options granted to our directors and employees. As of June 30, 2009, total compensation cost related to non-vested options awards not yet recognized amounted to $0.5 million, and we expect to recognize that amount over the remaining requisite service periods of the related awards of up to three years.

11. DEFERRED COMPENSATION

        During June 2006, 140,000 restricted shares were issued to key employees from our 2005 LTIP, previously discussed in Note 10. On July 2, 2007, we granted our executive officers restricted stock for services provided during the year ended June 30, 2007 totaling 395,000 shares with the restrictions on transfer lapsing for one-third of the shares on the first, second and third anniversaries of July 2, 2007.

        On May 12, 2008, we granted our executive officers restricted stock for services provided during the year ended June 30, 2008 totaling 460,000 shares with the restrictions on transfer lapsing for one-third of the shares on the first, second and third anniversaries of May 12, 2008. On June 23, 2008, in connection with his hiring, we granted an executive officer restricted stock totaling 100,000 shares with the restrictions on transfer lapsing for one-third of the shares on the first, second and third anniversaries of June 23, 2008.

F-85


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

11. DEFERRED COMPENSATION (Continued)

        A summary of non-vested restricted share activity for the three years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:

 
  Shares   Weighted
Average Grant-
Date Fair Value
  Fair Value
$000s
 

Non-vested restricted shares at July 1, 2006

    140,000   $ 5.62   $ 787  

Shares granted

    5,000     5.03     25  

Shares forfeited and surrendered

    (50,000 )   5.62     (281 )
               

Non-vested restricted shares at June 30, 2007

    95,000     5.59     531  

Shares granted

    955,000     6.86     6,552  

Shares vested

    (45,000 )   5.55     (250 )

Shares forfeited and surrendered

             
               

Non-vested restricted shares at June 30, 2008

    1,005,000     6.80     6,833  

Shares granted

             

Shares vested

    (394,376 )   6.61     (2,605 )

Shares forfeited and surrendered

    (130,624 )   6.76     (884 )
               

Non-vested restricted shares at June 30, 2009

    480,000   $ 6.97   $ 3,344  
               

        The restricted shares will vest to the individual employees based on future years of service ranging from one to three years depending on the life of the award agreement. The fair value is based on our actual stock price on the date of grant multiplied by the number of restricted shares granted. As of June 30, 2009, the value of non-vested restricted shares amounted to $3.3 million. In accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we have expensed $2.4 million, $1.7 million and $0.2 million, respectively, to stock compensation expense based on amortizing the fair value over the appropriate service period.

12. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

        Pursuant to an agreement dated December 16, 2004, as amended, we agreed with R.C. Boyd Enterprises, a Delaware corporation, to become the lead sponsor of a television production called Honey Hole ("Honey Hole Production"). As part of our sponsorship, we provided fishing and outdoor opportunities for children with cancer, children from abusive family situations and children of military veterans. We were entitled to receive two thirty-second commercials during all broadcasts of the Honey Hole Production and received opening and closing credits on each episode. Randall Boyd is the sole shareholder of R.C. Boyd Enterprises and is a member of our Board of Directors. Pursuant to an agreement dated as of December 5, 2007, as of December 31, 2008, we are no longer a Honey Hole Production sponsor. We paid no money to R.C. Boyd Enterprises after December 31, 2008. During the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we paid $75,000, $150,000 and $150,000, respectively, for sponsorship activities.

13. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

        SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, was issued by the FASB in September 2006. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements

F-86


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

13. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)


that require or permit fair value measurement. We adopted SFAS No. 157 on July 1, 2008. The initial adoption of SFAS 157 had no material impact to our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or the amount paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants (an exit price) at the measurement date. Fair value is a market based measurement considered from the perspective of a market participant. We use market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or unobservable. If observable prices or inputs are not available, unobservable prices or inputs are used to estimate the current fair value, often using an internal valuation model. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the item being valued. We primarily apply a market approach for recurring fair value measurements using the best available information while utilizing valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Our valuation includes the effect of potential non-performance by the counterparties.

        Beginning July 1, 2008, assets and liabilities recorded at fair value are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement). We classify fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

        Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

        Level 2—Inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable. These inputs are either directly observable in the marketplace or indirectly observable through corroboration with market data for substantially the full contractual term of the asset or liability being measured.

        Level 3—Inputs reflect management's best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the model.

        In valuing certain contracts, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. For disclosure purposes, assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety in the fair value hierarchy level based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the overall fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

        The fair value of our commodity derivative contracts and interest rate swap are measured using Level 2 inputs based on the hierarchies previously discussed.

        Our asset retirement obligation is measured using primarily Level 3 inputs. The significant unobservable inputs to this fair value measurement include estimates of plugging, abandonment and

F-87


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

13. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)


remediation costs, inflation rate and well life. The inputs are calculated based on historical data as well as current estimated costs.

        The estimated fair values of derivatives included in the consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2009 are summarized below.

In thousands
   
 

Derivative assets (Level 2):

       
 

Crude oil collars and price floors—current

  $ 2,507  
 

Crude oil collars and price floors—noncurrent

    1,569  
 

Natural gas collars and price floors—current

    2,448  
 

Natural gas collars and price floors—noncurrent

    1,101  
 

Interest rate swap—noncurrent

    212  

Derivative liability (Level 2)

       
 

Interest rate swap—current

    (159 )
       

Net derivative assets (Level 2)

  $ 7,678  
       

Asset retirement obligation (Level 3)

  $ (2,904 )
       

        At September 30, 2008, our net derivative liability was classified as Level 3 due to the subjectivity of our valuation for the effect of our own credit risk. At June 30, 2009, the subjective valuation of our own credit risk has an immaterial impact to our derivative valuation. Therefore, we have reclassified our derivative assets as Level 2 at June 30, 2009. The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 measurements for the year ended June 30, 2009.

 
  Unrealized
Losses
For Level 3
Assets/Liabilities
Outstanding at
June 30, 2008
  Total
Gains or
Losses(a)
  Purchases,
Sales,
Issuances,
and
Settlements,
net
  Transfers
out of
Level 3
  Ending
balance
  Unrealized Gains
for Level 3
Assets/Liabilities
Outstanding at
June 30, 2009
 

Derivatives

  $ (2,152 ) $ 17,565   $ (1,282 ) $ (14,131 ) $   $  

(a)
Total realized and unrealized gains are included in gain (loss) on commodity derivatives in the consolidated statements of operations.

F-88


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

13. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

        The following table shows the reconciliation of changes in the fair value of the net derivative assets and asset retirement obligation classified as Level 2 and 3, respectively, in the fair value hierarchy for the 12 months ended June 30, 2009.

In thousands
  Total Net
Derivative
Assets
  Asset
Retirement
Obligation
 

Balance at June 30, 2008

  $ (26,243 ) $ 3,403  
 

Unrealized gain on derivatives

    36,900      
 

Sale of "price floor" contracts

    (1,169 )    
 

Settlements, net

    (1,810 )    
 

Accretion of discount

        305  
 

Change in assumptions

        (626 )
 

Liabilities incurred for properties acquired

        18  
 

Liabilities incurred for properties drilled

        21  
 

Sale of Pantwist, LLC (Note 8)

        (90 )
 

Sale of Corsicana Properties (Note 8)

        (102 )
 

Liabilities settled

        (25 )
           

Balance at June 30, 2009

  $ 7,678   $ 2,904  
           

        The change from net derivative liabilities of $26.2 million at June 30, 2008 to net derivative assets of $7.7 million at June 30, 2009 is primarily attributable to the steep decline in crude oil and natural gas prices.

14. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS AND GOODWILL

        The decline in commodity prices created an uncertainty in the likelihood of developing our reserves associated with our Barnett Shale natural gas properties (the "Barnett Shale Properties") within the next five years. Therefore, during the quarter ended December 31, 2008, we recorded a $22.4 million pre-tax impairment to our Barnett Shale Properties and a $0.7 million pre-tax impairment to the goodwill associated with our subsidiary which holds the equity in our Barnett Shale Properties. During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we recorded an additional $4.3 million pre-tax impairment to our Barnett Shale Properties as the forward outlook for natural gas prices continued to decline.

        During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, we recorded a $3.5 million pre-tax impairment on our Corsicana Properties as it became unlikely that we would develop this asset within the next five years. During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, this $3.5 million charge was reclassified as part of income from discontinued operations as shown on our consolidated statements of operations. As previously discussed in Note 8, on December 2, 2008, we sold our interest in the Corsicana Properties for $0.3 million.

        The fair values for our Barnett Shale and Corsicana Properties were determined using estimates of future net cash flows, discounted to a present value, which is considered "Level 3" inputs as previously discussed in Note 13.

F-89


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

15. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION

        Our asset retirement obligation ("ARO") primarily represents the estimated present value of the amount we will incur to plug and abandon our producing properties at the end of their productive lives, in accordance with applicable state laws. We determine our ARO by calculating the present value of estimated cash flows related to the liability. At June 30, 2009, our liability for ARO was $2.9 million, of which $2.8 million was considered long term. At June 30, 2008, our liability for ARO was $3.4 million, of which $2.1 was considered long term and included $0.2 million reclassified to discontinued operations as previously discussed in Note 8. Our ARO is recorded as current or non-current liabilities based on the estimated timing of the related cash flows. For the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we have recognized accretion expense, net of discontinued operations, of $0.3 million, $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively.

        The following table describes the changes in our ARO for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):

Asset retirement obligation at June 30, 2007

  $ 2,415  
 

Accretion of discount

    219  
 

Change in estimate

    740  
 

Liability incurred for properties drilled

    93  
 

Liabilities settled

    (64 )
       

Asset retirement obligation at June 30, 2008

    3,403  
 

Accretion of discount

    305  
 

Change in estimate

    (626 )
 

Liabilities incurred for properties acquired

    18  
 

Liability incurred for properties drilled

    21  
 

Sale of Pantwist, LLC (Note 8)

    (90 )
 

Sale of Corsicana Properties (Note 8)

    (102 )
 

Liabilities settled

    (25 )
       

Asset retirement obligation at June 30, 2009

  $ 2,904  
       

        For the year ended June 30, 2009, the change in estimate resulted primarily from a change in estimated timing to plug and abandon wells. For the year ended June 30, 2008, the change in estimate resulted primarily from an increase in estimated costs to plug and abandon wells.

F-90


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

16. INCOME TAXES

        Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax provisions. Our income tax expense (benefit) is as follows:

 
  Years Ended June 30,  
In Thousands
  2009   2008   2007  

Current income tax expense (benefit)

                   
 

Federal

  $   $   $  
 

State

    (61 )   114     53  
               
   

Total current tax expense (benefit)

    (61 )   114     53  

Deferred income tax benefit

                   
 

Federal

    (4,952 )   (11,551 )   (2,847 )
 

State

    301     (330 )   (176 )
               
   

Total deferred tax benefit

    (4,651 )   (11,881 )   (3,023 )
               

Total income tax benefit

  $ (4,712 ) $ (11,767 ) $ (2,970 )
               

        A reconciliation of the differences between our applicable statutory tax rate and our effective income tax rate for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:

 
  Years Ended June 30,  
In Thousands, except %
  2009   2008   2007  

Rate

    35 %   35 %   35 %

Tax at statutory rate

  $ (5,748 ) $ (11,466 ) $ (2,896 )

State taxes

    240     (161 )    

Increase (decrease) resulting from:

                   

Change in Texas tax law

            (84 )

Permanent and other

    77     (140 )   (12 )

Differences in stock-based compensation expense

    472          

Goodwill Impairment

    247          

Change in valuation allowance

            22  
               

Income tax benefit

  $ (4,712 ) $ (11,767 ) $ (2,970 )
               

F-91


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

16. INCOME TAXES (Continued)

        A schedule showing the significant components of the net deferred tax liability as of June 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

 
  Years Ended June 30,  
In Thousands
  2009   2008  

Current

             

Deferred tax assets:

             
 

Unrealized loss on commodity derivatives

  $   $ 3,592  
 

Other

    305      
           
   

Total current deferred tax assets

    305     3,592  
           

Deferred tax liabilities:

             
 

Unrealized gain on commodity derivatives

    (1,736 )    
           
   

Total current deferred tax liabilities

    (1,736 )    
           
 

Net current deferred tax asset (liability)

  $ (1,431 ) $ 3,592  
           

Long-Term

             

Deferred tax assets:

             
 

Deferred compensation expense

  $ 2,327   $ 2,072  
 

Net operating loss carryovers

    12,463     6,415  
 

Unrealized loss on commodity derivatives

        7,356  
 

Other

    415     260  
           

    15,205     16,103  

Less: valuation allowance

    (770 )   (770 )
           
 

Total long-term deferred tax assets

    14,435     15,333  

Deferred tax liabilities:

             
 

Difference in book and tax bases:

             
   

Acquired oil and gas properties

    (36,122 )   (41,789 )
   

Other properties

        394  
   

Unrealized gain on commodity derivatives

    (1,144 )    
           
   

Total long-term deferred tax liabilities

    (37,266 )   (41,395 )
           

Net long-term deferred tax liability

  $ (22,831 ) $ (26,062 )
           

        In May 2006, the State of Texas enacted legislation for a Texas margin tax which restructured the state business tax by replacing the taxable capital and earned surplus components of the current franchise tax with a new "taxable margin" component. As the tax base for computing Texas margin tax is derived from an income-based measure, we have determined the margin tax is an income tax and the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax law should be included in tax expense attributable to continuing operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

        At June 30, 2009 and 2008, we had net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards for tax purposes of approximately $34.6 million and $17.8 million, respectively. The remaining net operating losses principally expire between 2024 and 2029. $2.2 million of these NOL carryforwards will be unavailable to offset any future taxable income due to limitations from change in ownership, which occurred at our

F-92


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

16. INCOME TAXES (Continued)


merger in May 2004, as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Service code. The tax effect of this limitation is recorded as a valuation allowance of $770,000 at both June 30, 2009 and 2008.

17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Burnett Case

        On March 23, 2006, the following lawsuit was filed in the 100th Judicial District Court in Carson County, Texas: Cause No. 9840, The Tom L. and Anne Burnett Trust, by Anne Burnett Windfohr, Windi Phillips, Ben Fortson, Jr., George Beggs, III and Ed Hudson, Jr. as Co-Trustees; Anne Burnett Windfohr; and Burnett Ranches, Ltd. v. Cano Petroleum, Inc., W.O. Energy of Nevada, Inc., W. O. Operating Company, Ltd. and WO Energy, Inc. The plaintiffs claim that the electrical wiring and equipment of Cano or certain of its subsidiaries relating to oil and natural gas operations started a wildfire that began on March 12, 2006 in Carson County, Texas.

        The plaintiffs (i) allege negligence and gross negligence and (ii) seek damages, including, but not limited to, damages for damage to their land and livestock, certain expenses related to fighting the fire and certain remedial expenses totaling approximately $1.7 million to $1.8 million. In addition, the plaintiffs seek (i) termination of certain oil and natural gas leases, (ii) reimbursement for their attorney's fees (in the amount of at least $549,000) and (iii) exemplary damages. The plaintiffs also claim that Cano and its subsidiaries are jointly and severally liable as a single business enterprise and/or a general partnership or de facto partnership. The owner of the remainder of the mineral estate, Texas Christian University, intervened in the suit on August 18, 2006, joining Plaintiffs' request to terminate certain oil and gas leases. On June 21, 2007, the judge of the 100th Judicial District Court issued a Final Judgment (a) granting motions for summary judgment in favor of Cano and certain of its subsidiaries on plaintiffs' claims for (i) breach of contract/termination of an oil and gas lease; and (ii) negligence; and (b) granting the plaintiffs' no-evidence motion for summary judgment on contributory negligence, assumption of risk, repudiation and estoppel affirmative defenses asserted by Cano and certain of its subsidiaries.

        The Final Judgment was appealed and a decision was reached on March 11, 2009, as the Court of Appeals for the Tenth District of Texas in Amarillo affirmed in part and reversed in part the ruling of the 100th Judicial District Court. The Court of Appeals (a) affirmed the trial court's granting of summary judgment in Cano's favor for breach of contract/termination of an oil and gas lease and (b) reversed the trial court's granting of summary judgment in Cano's favor on plaintiffs' claims of Cano's negligence. The Court of Appeals ordered the case remanded to the 100th Judicial District Court. On March 30, 2009, the plaintiffs filed a motion for rehearing with the Court of Appeals and requested a rehearing on the affirmance of the trial court's holding on the plaintiffs' breach of contract/termination of an oil and gas lease claim. On June 30, 2009, the Court of Appeals ruled to deny the plaintiff's motion for rehearing. On August 17, 2009 we filed an appeal with the Texas Supreme Court to request the reversal of the Court of Appeals ruling regarding our potential negligence.

        Due to the inherent risk of litigation, the ultimate outcome of this case is uncertain and unpredictable. At this time, Cano management continues to believe that this lawsuit is without merit and will continue to vigorously defend itself and its subsidiaries, while seeking cost-effective solutions to resolve this lawsuit. We have not yet determined whether to seek further review by the Court of Appeals or the Texas Supreme Court. Based on our knowledge and judgment of the facts as of

F-93


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)


June 30, 2009, we believe our financial statements present fairly the effect of actual and anticipated ultimate costs to resolve these matters as of June 30, 2009.

Settled Cases

        On April 28, 2006, the following lawsuit was filed in the 31st Judicial District Court of Roberts County, Texas: Cause No. 1922, Robert and Glenda Adcock, et al. v. Cano Petroleum, Inc., W.O. Energy of Nevada, Inc., W. O. Operating Company, Ltd. and WO Energy, Inc. (the "Adcock case"). The plaintiffs claimed that the electrical wiring and equipment of Cano or certain of its subsidiaries relating to oil and gas operations started a wildfire that began on March 12, 2006 in Carson County, Texas. The plaintiffs (i) alleged negligence, res ipsa loquitor, trespass and nuisance and (ii) sought damages, including, but not limited to, damages to their land, buildings and livestock and certain remedial expenses totaling $5,439,958. In addition, the plaintiffs sought (i) reimbursement for their attorneys' fees and (ii) exemplary damages. The plaintiffs also claimed that Cano and its subsidiaries were jointly and severally liable as a single business enterprise and/or a general partnership or de facto partnership. The claims of all plaintiffs in this suit were resolved through a Settlement and Release Agreement effective November 5, 2008 and were dismissed with prejudice.

        On July 6, 2006, Anna McMordie Henry and Joni McMordie Middleton intervened in the Adcock case. The intervenors (i) alleged negligence and (ii) sought damages totaling $64,357 as well as exemplary damages. The claims of these intervenors were resolved through a Settlement and Release Agreement effective December 9, 2008 and were dismissed with prejudice.

        On July 20, 2006, Abraham Brothers, LP, Edward C. Abraham, Salem A. and Ruth Ann Abraham and Jason M. Abraham intervened in the Adcock case. The intervenors (i) alleged negligence, nuisance, and trespass and (ii) sought damages, including, but not limited to, damages to their land, buildings and livestock and certain remedial expenses totaling $3,252,862. In addition, the intervenors sought (i) reimbursement for their attorneys' fees and (ii) exemplary damages. The intervenors also claimed that Cano and its subsidiaries were jointly and severally liable as a single business enterprise and/or a general partnership or de facto partnership. The claims of Abraham Brothers, LP, Edward C. Abraham, Salem A. and Ruth Ann Abraham and Jason M. Abraham (along with those asserted by Abraham Equine, Inc. discussed below) were resolved through a Settlement Agreement and Release effective October 12, 2008 and were dismissed with prejudice.

        On August 9, 2006, Riley Middleton intervened in the Adcock case. The intervenor (i) alleged negligence and (ii) sought damages totaling $233,386 as well as exemplary damages. The claims of this intervenor were resolved through a Settlement and Release Agreement effective December 9, 2008 and were dismissed with prejudice.

        On April 10, 2006, the following lawsuit was filed in the 31st Judicial District Court of Roberts County, Texas, Cause No. 1920, Joseph Craig Hutchison and Judy Hutchison v. Cano Petroleum, Inc., W.O. Energy of Nevada, Inc., W. O. Operating Company, Ltd, and WO Energy, Inc. (the "Hutchinson case"). The plaintiffs claimed that the electrical wiring and equipment of Cano or certain of its subsidiaries relating to oil and gas operations started a wildfire that began on March 12, 2006 in Carson County, Texas. The plaintiffs (i) alleged negligence and trespass and (ii) sought damages of $621,058, including, but not limited to, damages to their land and certain remedial expenses. In addition, the plaintiffs sought exemplary damages. The claims of all plaintiffs were resolved through a Settlement and Release Agreement effective December 9, 2008 and were dismissed with prejudice.

F-94


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

        On May 1, 2006, the following lawsuit was filed in the 31st Judicial District Court of Roberts County, Texas: Cause No. 1923, Chisum Family Partnership, Ltd. v. Cano, W.O. Energy of Nevada, Inc., W. O. Operating Company, Ltd. and WO Energy, Inc. (the "Chisum" case). The plaintiff claimed that the electrical wiring and equipment of Cano or certain of its subsidiaries relating to oil and gas operations started a wildfire that began on March 12, 2006 in Carson County, Texas. The plaintiff (i) alleged negligence and trespass and (ii) sought damages of $53,738.82, including, but not limited to, damages to their land and certain remedial expenses. In addition, the plaintiffs sought exemplary damages. The claims of all plaintiffs and intervenor were resolved through a Settlement and Release Agreement effective December 9, 2008 and were dismissed with prejudice.

        On August 9, 2006, the following lawsuit was filed in the 233rd Judicial District Court of Gray County, Texas, Cause No. 34,423, Yolanda Villarreal, Individually and on behalf of the Estate of Gerardo Villarreal v. Cano Petroleum, Inc., W.O. Energy of Nevada, Inc., W. O. Operating Company, Ltd., and WO Energy, Inc. (the "Villarreal case"). The plaintiffs claimed that the electrical wiring and equipment of Cano or certain of its subsidiaries relating to oil and gas operations started a wildfire that began on March 12, 2006 in Carson County, Texas. The plaintiffs (i) alleged negligence and (ii) sought damages for past and future financial support in the amount of $586,334, in addition to undisclosed damages for wrongful death and survival damages, as well as exemplary damages, for the wrongful death of Gerardo Villarreal who they claimed died as a result of the fire. The plaintiffs also claimed that Cano and its subsidiaries were jointly and severally liable under vicarious liability theories. On August 22, 2006, relatives of Roberto Chavira intervened in the case alleging similar claims and sought damages for lost economic support and lost household services in the amount of $894,078, in addition to undisclosed damages for wrongful death and survival damages, as well as exemplary damages regarding the death of Roberto Chavira. The claims of all plaintiffs and intervenors were resolved through Settlement and Release Agreements effective December 8, 2008 and were dismissed with prejudice.

        On March 14, 2007, the following lawsuit was filed in 100th Judicial District Court in Carson County, Texas; Cause No. 9994, Southwestern Public Service Company d/b/a Xcel Energy v. Cano Petroleum, Inc., W.O. Energy of Nevada, Inc., W. O. Operating Company, Ltd, and WO Energy, Inc. (the "SPS case"). The plaintiff claimed that the electrical wiring and equipment of Cano or certain of its subsidiaries relating to oil and gas operations started a wildfire that began on March 12, 2006 in Carson County, Texas. The plaintiff (i) alleged negligence and breach of contract and (ii) sought $1,876,000 in damages for loss and damage to transmission and distribution equipment, utility poles, lines and other equipment. In addition, the plaintiff sought reimbursement of its attorney's fees. The claims of plaintiff were resolved through a Settlement and Release Agreement effective January 8, 2009 and were dismissed with prejudice.

        On May 2, 2007, the following lawsuit was filed in the 84th Judicial District Court of Hutchinson County, Texas, Cause No. 37,619, Gary and Genia Burgess, et al. v. Cano Petroleum, Inc., W.O. Energy of Nevada, Inc., W.O. Operating, Ltd. and WO Energy, Inc. (the "Burgess case"). Eleven plaintiffs claimed that electrical wiring and equipment relating to oil and gas operations of the Company or certain of its subsidiaries started a wildfire that began on March 12, 2006 in Carson County, Texas. Five of the plaintiffs were former plaintiffs in the Adcock matter. The plaintiffs (i) alleged negligence, res ipsa loquitor, nuisance, and trespass and (ii) sought damages, including, but not limited to, damages to their land, buildings and livestock and certain remedial expenses totaling approximately $1,997,217.86. In addition, the plaintiffs sought (i) reimbursement for their attorneys' fees and (ii) exemplary damages.

F-95


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)


The plaintiffs also claimed that Cano and its subsidiaries were jointly and severally liable as a single business enterprise and/or as a partnership or de facto partnership. The claims of all plaintiffs were resolved through a Settlement and Release Agreement effective November 5, 2008 and were dismissed with prejudice.

        On May 15, 2007, William L. Arrington, William M. Arrington and Mark and Le'Ann Mitchell intervened in the SPS case. The intervenors (i) alleged negligence, res ipsa loquitor, nuisance, and trespass and (ii) sought damages, including, but not limited to, damages to their land, buildings and livestock and certain remedial expenses totaling approximately $118,320. In addition, the intervenors sought (i) reimbursement for their attorney's fees and (ii) exemplary damages. The intervenors also claimed that Cano and its subsidiaries were jointly and severally liable as a single business enterprise and/or a general partnership or de facto partnership. The claims of these intervenors were resolved through a Settlement and Release Agreement effective November 5, 2008 and were dismissed with prejudice.

        On September 25, 2007, the Texas Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation granted Cano Petroleum, Inc., W.O. Energy of Nevada, Inc., W. O. Operating Company, Ltd, and WO Energy, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer Related Cases to Pretrial Court pursuant to Texas Rule of Judicial Administration 13. The panel transferred all pending cases (Adcock, Chisum, Hutchison, Villarreal, SPS, and Burgess, identified above, and Valenzuela, Abraham Equine, Pfeffer, and Ayers, identified below) that assert claims against the Company and its subsidiaries related to wildfires beginning on March 12, 2006 to a single pretrial court for consideration of pretrial matters. The panel transferred all then-pending cases to the Honorable Paul Davis, retired judge of the 200th District Court of Travis County, Texas, as Cause No. D-1-GN-07-003353.

        On October 3, 2007, Firstbank Southwest, as Trustee for the John and Eddalee Haggard Trust (the "Trust") filed a Petition in intervention as part of the Hutchison case. The Trust claimed that the electrical wiring and equipment of Cano or certain of its subsidiaries relating to oil and gas operations started a wildfire that began on March 12, 2006 in Carson County, Texas. The Trust (i) alleged negligence and trespass and (ii) sought damages of $46,362.50, including, but not limited to, damages to land and certain remedial expenses. In addition, the Trust sought exemplary damages. The claims of this intervenor were resolved through a Settlement and Release Agreement effective December 9, 2008 and were dismissed with prejudice.

        On January 10, 2008, Philip L. Fletcher intervened in the consolidated case in the 200th District Court of Travis County, Texas as part of the SPS case. The intervenor (i) alleged negligence, trespass and nuisance and (ii) sought damages of $120,408, including, but not limited to, damages to his livestock, attorneys' fees and exemplary damages. The intervenor also claimed that Cano and its subsidiaries were jointly and severally liable as a single business enterprise and/or as a partnership or de facto partnership. The claims of this intervenor were resolved through a Settlement and Release Agreement effective December 9, 2008 and were dismissed with prejudice.

        On January 15, 2008, the Jones and McMordie Ranch Partnership intervened in the consolidated case in the 200th District Court of Travis County, Texas as part of the SPS case. The intervenor (i) alleged negligence, trespass and nuisance and (ii) sought damages of $86,250.71, including, but not limited to, damages to his livestock, attorneys' fees and exemplary damages. The intervenor also claimed that Cano and its subsidiaries were jointly and severally liable as a single business enterprise

F-96


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)


and/or as a partnership or de facto partnership. The claims of this intervenor were resolved through a Settlement and Release Agreement effective December 9, 2008 and were dismissed with prejudice.

        On February 11, 2008, the following lawsuit was filed in the 48th Judicial District Court of Tarrant County, Texas: Cause No. 048-228763-08, Abraham Equine, Inc. v. Cano Petroleum, Inc., W.O. Energy of Nevada, Inc., W.O. Operating, Ltd. and WO Energy, Inc. (the "Abraham Equine case"). The plaintiff claimed that the electrical wiring and equipment of Cano or certain of its subsidiaries relating to oil and gas operations started a wildfire that began on March 12, 2006 in Carson County. The plaintiff (i) alleged negligence, trespass and nuisance and (ii) sought damages of $1,608,000, including, but not limited to, damages to its land, livestock and lost profits. In addition, the plaintiff sought (i) reimbursement for its attorneys' fees and (ii) exemplary damages. The plaintiff also claimed that Cano and its subsidiaries were jointly and severally liable as a single business enterprise and/or a general partnership or de facto partnership. Cano and its subsidiaries filed a Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue and a Notice of Tag Along transferring the case to the Multidistrict Litigation Case in the 200th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas. On May 2, 2008, the Court heard Cano's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue and took the motion under advisement. This suit (along with the claims of Abraham Brothers, LP, Edward C. Abraham, Salem A. and Ruth Ann Abraham and Jason M. Abraham, discussed above) was resolved through a Settlement and Release Agreement effective October 12, 2008 and were dismissed with prejudice.

        On March 10, 2008, the following lawsuit was filed in the 352nd Judicial District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, Cause No. 352-229256-08, Gary Pfeffer v. Cano Petroleum, Inc., W.O. Energy of Nevada, Inc., W.O. Operating, Ltd. and WO Energy, Inc. (the "Pfeffer case"). The plaintiff claimed that the electrical wiring and equipment of Cano or certain of its subsidiaries relating to oil and gas operations started a wildfire that began on March 12, 2006 in Carson County. The plaintiff (i) alleged negligence, trespass and nuisance, (ii) sought undisclosed damages for the wrongful death of his father, Bill W. Pfeffer, who he claimed died as a result of the fire and (iii) sought actual damages of $1,023,572.37 for damages to his parents' home and property. In addition, the plaintiff sought exemplary damages. The plaintiff also claimed that Cano and its subsidiaries were jointly and severally liable as a general partnership or de facto partnership. Cano and its subsidiaries filed a Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue and a Notice of Tag Along transferring the case to the Multidistrict Litigation Case in the 200th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas. On May 2, 2008, the Court heard Cano's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue and took the motion under advisement. The claims of plaintiff were resolved through a Settlement and Release Agreement effective December 10, 2008 and were dismissed with prejudice.

        On March 11, 2008, the following lawsuit was filed in the 141st Judicial District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, Cause No. 141-229281-08, Pamela Ayers, et al. v. Cano Petroleum, Inc., W.O. Energy of Nevada, Inc., W.O. Operating, Ltd. and WO Energy, Inc. (the "Ayers case"). The plaintiffs claimed that the electrical wiring and equipment of Cano or certain of its subsidiaries relating to oil and gas operations started a wildfire that began on March 12, 2006 in Carson County. The plaintiffs (i) alleged negligence and (ii) sought undisclosed damages for the wrongful death of their mother, Kathy Ryan, who they claimed died as a result of the fire. In addition, the plaintiffs sought exemplary damages. The plaintiffs also claimed that Cano and its subsidiaries were jointly and severally liable as a single business enterprise and/or general partnership or de facto partnership. Cano and its subsidiaries filed a Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue and a Notice of Tag Along transferring the case to the Multidistrict Litigation Case in the 200th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas. On

F-97


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)


May 2, 2008, the Court heard Cano's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue and took the motion under advisement. The claims of plaintiffs were resolved through a Settlement and Release Agreement effective December 10, 2008 and were dismissed with prejudice.

        On March 12, 2008, the following lawsuit was filed in the 17th Judicial District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, Cause No. 017-229316-08, The Travelers Lloyds Insurance Company and Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company v. Cano Petroleum, Inc., W.O. Energy of Nevada, Inc., W.O. Operating, Ltd. and WO Energy, Inc. (the "Travelers case"). The plaintiffs claimed that the electrical wiring and equipment of Cano or certain of its subsidiaries relating to oil and gas operations started a wildfire that began on March 12, 2006 in Carson County. The plaintiffs (i) alleged negligence, res ipsa loquitor, and trespass and (ii) claimed they are subrogated to the rights of their insureds for damages to their buildings and building contents totaling $447,764.60. The plaintiffs also claimed that Cano and its subsidiaries were jointly and severally liable as a single business enterprise and/or general partnership or de facto partnership. The claims of plaintiffs were resolved through a Settlement and Release Agreement effective November 18, 2008 and were dismissed with prejudice.

        On December 18, 2007, the following lawsuit was filed in the 348th Judicial District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, Cause No. 348-227907-07, Norma Valenzuela, et al. v. Cano Petroleum, Inc., W.O. Energy of Nevada, Inc., W.O. Operating, Ltd. and WO Energy, Inc. (the "Valenzuela case"). Six plaintiffs, including the two plaintiffs and intervenor from the nonsuited Martinez case, claimed that the electrical wiring and equipment of Cano or certain of its subsidiaries relating to oil and gas operations started a wildfire that began on March 12, 2006 in Carson County, Texas. The plaintiffs (i) alleged negligence and (ii) sought actual damages in the minimal amount of $4,413,707 for the wrongful death of four relatives, Manuel Dominguez, Roberto Chavira, Gerardo Villarreal and Medardo Garcia, who they claimed died as a result of the fire. In addition, plaintiffs sought (i) reimbursement for their attorneys' fees and (ii) exemplary damages. The plaintiffs also claimed that Cano and its subsidiaries are jointly and severally liable as a single business enterprise and/or as a partnership or de facto partnership. Cano and its subsidiaries filed a Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue and a Notice of Tag Along transferring the case to the Multidistrict Litigation Case in the 200th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas. On May 2, 2008, the Court heard Cano's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue and took the motion under advisement. The claims of plaintiffs were resolved through a Settlement and Release Agreement effective April 9, 2009 and were dismissed with prejudice.

        On June 20, 2006, the following lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division, C.A. No. 4-06cv-434-A, Mid-Continent Casualty Company ("Mid-Con") v. Cano Petroleum, Inc., W.O. Energy of Nevada, Inc., W.O. Operating Company, Ltd. and W.O. Energy, Inc. seeking a declaration that the plaintiff is not responsible for pre-tender defense costs and that the plaintiff has the sole and exclusive right to select defense counsel and to defend, investigate, negotiate and settle the litigation described above. On September 18, 2006, the First Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment was filed with regard to the cases described above.

        On February 9, 2007, Cano and its subsidiaries entered into a Settlement Agreement and Release with Mid-Con pursuant to which in exchange for mutual releases, in addition to the approximately

F-98


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)


$923,000 that we have been reimbursed by Mid-Con, Mid-Con agreed to pay to Cano within 20 business days of February 9, 2007 the amount of $6,699,827 comprising the following: (a) the $1,000,000 policy limits of the primary policy; (b) the $5,000,000 policy limits of the excess policy; (c) $500,000 for future defense costs; (d) $144,000 as partial payment for certain unpaid invoices for litigation related expenses; (e) all approved reasonable and necessary litigation related expenses through December 21, 2006 that are not part of the above-referenced $144,000; and (f) certain specified attorneys' fees. During February 2007, we received the $6,699,827 payment from Mid-Con. Of this $6,699,827 amount, the payments for policy limits amounting to $6,000,000 were recorded as a liability under deferred litigation credit as presented on our consolidated balance sheet.

        On March 11, 2008, one of Cano's subsidiaries entered into a tolling agreement with an independent electrical contractor that was identified as a potentially responsible third party in connection with the claims related to the pending wildfire litigation against Cano and its subsidiaries. In accordance with the terms of a Settlement and Release Agreement effective October 11, 2008, the independent electrical contractor paid Cano its full insurance policy limits totaling $6.0 million in exchange for a full release of any existing or future claims related to wildfires that began on March 12, 2006 in Carson County, Texas. The $6.0 million was received on October 31, 2008.

        The $12.0 million of insurance proceeds (from Mid-Con and the independent electrical contractor) have been expended directly or indirectly to pay the settlements described above. Accordingly, we no longer have a deferred litigation credit balance. During the year ended June 30, 2009, we incurred expense of $6.6 million for legal and settlement expenses in connection with the fire litigation lawsuits.

        On March 6, 2009, the Amended and Restated Escrow Agreement ("Escrow Agreement") terminated in accordance with its terms that was entered into on June 18, 2007 by and among Cano, the Estate of Miles O'Loughlin and Scott White (the "W.O. Sellers") and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (the "Trustee") related to the November 2005 purchase of W.O. Energy of Nevada, Inc., and its subsidiaries, W.O. Operating Company, Ltd., W.O. Production Company, Ltd., and WO Energy, Inc. (collectively "W.O."). Pursuant to the terms of the Escrow Agreement, the Trustee returned to us 434,783 shares of Cano common stock owned by the W.O. Sellers which had been held in trust for our benefit. The shares are held by us as treasury stock. In addition, the W.O. Sellers provided additional consideration (collectively, the 434,783 shares and the additional consideration being the "W.O. Settlement").

        On October 2, 2008, a lawsuit (08 CV 8462) was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, against David W. Wehlmann; Gerald W. Haddock; Randall Boyd; Donald W. Niemiec; Robert L. Gaudin; William O. Powell, III and the underwriters of the June 26, 2008 public offering of Cano common stock ("Secondary Offering") alleging violations of the federal securities laws. Messrs. Wehlmann, Haddock, Boyd, Niemiec, Gaudin and Powell were Cano outside directors on June 26, 2008. At the defendants' request, the case was transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

        On July 2, 2009, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint that added as defendants Cano, Cano's Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, Jeff Johnson, Cano's former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Morris B. "Sam" Smith, Cano's current Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Ben Daitch, Cano's Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer, Michael

F-99


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)


Ricketts and Cano's Senior Vice President of Engineering and Operations, Patrick McKinney, and dismissed Gerald W. Haddock, a former director of Cano, as a defendant. The amended complaint alleges that the prospectus for the Secondary Offering contained statements regarding Cano's proved reserve amounts and standards that were materially false and overstated Cano's proved reserves. The plaintiff is seeking to certify the lawsuit as a class action lawsuit and is seeking an unspecified amount of damages. On July 27, 2009, the defendants moved to dismiss the lawsuit. Due to the inherent risk of litigation, the outcome of this lawsuit is uncertain and unpredictable; however, Cano, its officers and its outside directors intend to vigorously defend the lawsuit. Cano is cooperating with its directors and officers liability insurance carrier regarding the defense of the lawsuit. We believe that the potential amount of losses resulting from this lawsuit in the future, if any, will not exceed the policy limits of Cano's directors' and officers' insurance.

        Occasionally, we are involved in other various claims and lawsuits and certain governmental proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Our management does not believe that the ultimate resolution of any current matters that are not set forth above will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations. Management's position is supported, in part, by the existence of insurance coverage, indemnification and escrow accounts. None of our directors, officers or affiliates, owners of record or beneficial owners of more than five percent of any class of our voting securities, or security holder is involved in a proceeding adverse to us or our subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to us or our subsidiaries.

        To date, our expenditures to comply with environmental or safety regulations have not been significant and are not expected to be significant in the future. However, new regulations, enforcement policies, claims for damages or other events could result in significant future costs.

        Effective June 1, 2009, we entered into a non-cancelable operating lease for our principal executive offices in Fort Worth, Texas. The lease expires on May 31, 2014. Our remaining obligation for the life of the lease is $3.0 million. In addition, during October 2005 we entered into a five-year operating lease for our field offices in Pampa, Texas expiring on October 1, 2010. Future minimum rentals due under our non-cancellable operating leases were as follows on June 30, 2009:

In Thousands
  2010   2011   2012   2013   2014   Total  

Total operating lease obligations

  $ 516   $ 603   $ 630   $ 664   $ 635   $ 3,048  

        Rent expense amounted to $0.3 million, $0.4 million, and $0.3 million for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

        We have employment contracts with our executives that specify annual compensation, and provide for potential payments up to three times the annual salary and bonuses and immediate vesting of

F-100


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

unexercised stock options and restricted stock under termination or change in control circumstances. The annual salaries and contract termination dates for each executive are as follows:

 
  Annual
Compensation
  Contract
Termination
Date
 

Chief Executive Officer

  $ 545,144     May 31, 2011  

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

    250,000     June 23, 2011  

Senior Vice President of Operations

    250,000     May 31, 2011  

Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer

    187,000     May 31, 2011  

Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

    170,000     May 31, 2011  

18. SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES

        All of our operations are directly related to oil and natural gas producing activities located in Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico.

Capitalized Costs Relating to Oil and Gas Producing Activities

 
  June 30,  
In Thousands
  2009   2008  

Mineral interests in oil and gas properties:

             
 

Proved

  $ 78,777   $ 87,307  
 

Unproved

         

Wells and related equipment and facilities

    157,202     137,734  

Support equipment and facilities used in oil and gas producing activities

    3,592     2,566  

Uncompleted wells, equipment and facilities

    49,286     47,568  
           

Total capitalized costs

    288,857     275,175  

Less accumulated depletion and depreciation

    (40,208 )   (10,281 )
           

Net capitalized costs

  $ 248,649   $ 264,894  
           

        At June 30, 2009, accumulated depletion and depreciation expense of $40.2 million includes impairment of our Barnett Shale Properties totaling $26.7 million, as previously discussed in Note 14.

F-101


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

18. SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES (Continued)

Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Producing Activities

 
  Years Ended June 30,  
In Thousands
  2009   2008   2007  

Acquisition of proved properties

  $ 77   $ 899   $ 9,874  

Acquisition of unproved properties

             

Development costs

    48,657     77,868     40,052  

Exploration costs

    2,967     6,629     5,395  
               

Total costs incurred, net of sale of oil and gas properties

  $ 51,701   $ 85,396   $ 55,321  
               

Proved Reserves (Unaudited)

        Our proved oil and natural gas reserves have been estimated by independent petroleum engineers, Miller and Lents, LTD for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and Forrest A. Garb & Associates, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2007. Proved reserves are the estimated quantities that geologic and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed reserves are the quantities expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Due to the inherent uncertainties and the limited nature of reservoir data, such estimates are subject to change as additional information becomes available. The reserves actually recovered and the timing of production of these reserves may be substantially different from the original estimate. Revisions result primarily from new information obtained from development drilling and production history, acquisitions of crude oil and natural gas properties and changes in economic factors.

        The term proved reserves is defined by the SEC in Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X adopted under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In general, proved reserves are the estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids that geological or engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions, i.e., prices and costs as of the date the estimate is made. Prices include consideration of changes in existing prices provided only by contractual arrangements, but not on escalations based on future conditions.

        Our estimates of proved reserves materially impact depletion expense. If proved reserves decline, then the rate at which we record depletion expense increases, reducing net income. A decline in estimated proved reserves may result from lower prices, adverse operating history, mechanical problems on our wells and catastrophic events such as explosions, hurricanes and floods. Lower prices also may make it uneconomic to drill wells or produce from fields with high operating costs. In addition, a decline in proved reserves may impact our assessment of our crude oil and natural gas properties for impairment. Seventy-nine percent of our proved reserves are classified as proved undeveloped reserves. Capital expenditures forecasted in our reserve report amount to approximately $332.7 million throughout the life of our reserves. Further, capital expenditures exceed our expected operating cash flows in our reserve report for the four-year period succeeding June 30, 2009. We are dependent upon our cash flow from operations and the credit and capital markets to fund the development of these

F-102


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

18. SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES (Continued)


reserves. As we have done during each year of our existence, to develop our reserves as reported in our June 30, 2009 reserve report, we will require access to the capital markets in each of the next four years, as our projected capital expenditures are greater than projected cash flow from operations through December 2012.

        Our proved reserves are summarized in the table below.

 
  Crude Oil
Mbbls
  Natural Gas
MMCF
  Total Reserves
MBOE
 

Reserves at July 1, 2006

    33,868     69,102     45,385  

Purchases of minerals in place

    7,757     8,159     9,117  

Extensions and discoveries

        64,940     10,823  

Sale of minerals in place

    (216 )   (2,132 )   (571 )

Revisions of prior estimates

    1,204     7,712     2,489  

Production

    (283 )   (1,441 )   (523 )
               

Reserves at June 30, 2007

    42,330     146,340     66,720  

Purchases of minerals in place

    1,592     1,680     1,872  

Extensions and discoveries

    3,894     10,861     5,704  

Revisions of prior estimates

    (8,403 )   (73,097 )   (20,586 )

Production

    (297 )   (1,345 )   (521 )
               

Reserves at June 30, 2008

    39,116     84,439     53,189  

Extensions and discoveries

    2,544     472     2,623  

Sale of minerals in place

    (1,240 )   (7,886 )   (2,554 )

Revisions of prior estimates

    (1,338 )   (14,191 )   (3,703 )

Production

    (311 )   (881 )   (458 )
               

Reserves at June 30, 2009

    38,771     61,953     49,097  
               

Proved developed reserves at June 30, 2007

    6,555     28,450     11,297  

Proved developed reserves at June 30, 2008

    8,118     29,886     13,099  

Proved developed reserves at June 30, 2009

    7,027     18,322     10,081  

        The base prices used to compute the crude oil and natural gas reserves represent the NYMEX oil and natural gas prices at June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. For the reserves at June 30, 2009, the crude oil and natural gas prices were $69.89 per barrel and $3.71 per MMbtu, respectively. For the reserves at June 30, 2008, the crude oil and natural gas prices were $140.00 per barrel and $13.15 per MMbtu, respectively. For the reserves at June 30, 2007, the crude oil and natural gas prices were $70.47 per barrel and $6.40 per MMbtu, respectively.

        Effective July 1, 2009 (for our next fiscal year ending June 30, 2010), the base prices used to compute reserves will conform to recent SEC regulations that specify an average price should be used during the company's fiscal year based on NYMEX commodity prices on the first day of each of the 12 months.

        For the reserves at June 30, 2009, the extensions and discoveries pertain to our drilling and completing wells, and results of the waterflood project in the San Andres formation at our Cato Properties.

F-103


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

18. SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES (Continued)

        For the reserves at June 30, 2009 and 2007, the sales of minerals in place pertain to our divestitures of oil and natural gas properties located in Texas and Oklahoma, respectively.

        For the reserves at June 30, 2009, the reduction for revisions of prior estimates pertain to the impairments of our Barnett Shale Properties (Note 14) of 2,269 MBOE and other revisions of 1,434 MBOE driven primarily from the decline in commodity prices and forecast changes which reduced the economic life of our assets, as compared to proved reserves as of June 30, 2008. The specific field changes are as follows:

        For the reserves at June 30, 2008 and 2007, the purchases of minerals in place pertain to our acquisitions of oil and natural gas properties located in the Texas Panhandle ("Panhandle Properties") and southwestern New Mexico ("Cato Properties").

        For the reserves at June 30, 2008, the extensions and discoveries pertain to our drilling and completing wells at the Cato Properties and the Panhandle Properties, and results of the waterflood project at the Panhandle Properties.

        For the reserves at June 30, 2008, the reduction for revisions of prior estimates primarily pertains to our Desdemona, Panhandle and Pantwist Properties.

F-104


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

18. SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES (Continued)

        The reductions in crude oil and natural gas reserves were partially offset by a proved reserve increases of 4.4 MMBOE at the Cato Field, where third-party engineering and geologic studies confirmed increases to original oil in place estimates and PUD reserves, and an infill drilling program resulted in an increase in PDP and PDNP reserves. There were also the following proved reserve increases for positive performance due to price increases: (i) at Panhandle, PDP reserves were increased by 0.2 MMBOE; (ii) at Davenport, PDP reserves were increased by 0.05 MMBOE; (iii) at Desdemona, PDNP reserves were increased by 0.3 MMBOE; (iv) at Corsicana, PDP and PDNP reserves, in the aggregate, were increased by 0.02 MMBOE; and (v) at Pantwist, PDP reserves were increased by 0.01 MMBOE. We also transferred reserves of 0.4 MMBOE from PDNP to PDP at Davenport and reserves of 1.4 MMBOE from PUD to PDP at the Panhandle Properties.

        For the reserves at June 30, 2007, the extensions and discoveries pertain to our drilling and completing wells in the Barnett Shale formation at our Desdemona Properties.

Standardized Measure (Unaudited)

        The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows ("standardized measure") and changes in such cash flows are prepared using assumptions including the use of year-end prices for oil and natural gas and year-end costs for estimated future development and production expenditures to produce year-end estimated proved reserves. Discounted future net cash flows are calculated using a 10% annual discount rate.

        Estimated well abandonment costs, net of salvage, are deducted from the standardized measure using year-end costs. Such abandonment costs are recorded as a liability on the consolidated balance sheets, using estimated values of the projected abandonment date and discounted using a risk-adjusted rate at the time the well is drilled or acquired.

        The standardized measure does not represent management's estimate of our future cash flows or the value of proved oil and natural gas reserves. Probable and possible reserves, which may become proved in the future, are excluded from the calculations. Furthermore, year-end prices used to determine the standardized measure of discounted cash flows, are influenced by seasonal demand and other factors and may not be the most representative in estimating future revenues or reserve data.

        Price and cost revisions are primarily the net result of changes in year-end prices, based on beginning of year reserve estimates. Quantity estimate revisions are primarily the result of the extended economic life of proved reserves, proved undeveloped reserve additions attributable to increased development activity, reduced reserves due to lower performance from the existing wells, reduced reserves to comply with current industry practice that limited the number of PUD locations that could be booked against existing wells and lower reserves if a company is unable to commit to developing PUD reserves within five years.

F-105


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

18. SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES (Continued)

Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Cash Flows (Unaudited)

        The standardized measure of discounted estimated future net cash flows related to proved crude oil and natural gas reserves for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:

In Thousands
  2009   2008   2007  

Future cash inflows

  $ 2,751,854   $ 6,695,248   $ 3,902,164  

Future production costs

    (767,743 )   (1,251,161 )   (933,538 )

Future development costs

    (332,677 )   (392,248 )   (324,787 )

Future income taxes

    (535,300 )   (1,759,461 )   (920,000 )
               

Future net cash flows

    1,116,134     3,292,378     1,723,839  

10% annual discount

    (834,122 )   (1,879,835 )   (1,022,808 )
               

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

  $ 282,012   $ 1,412,543   $ 701,031  
               

Changes in Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Cash Flows: (Unaudited)

        The primary changes in the standardized measure of discounted estimated future net cash flows for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:

In Thousands
  2009   2008   2007  

Balance at beginning of year

  $ 1,412,543   $ 701,031   $ 342,464  

Net changes in prices and production costs

    (1,598,659 )   1,700,142     (7,186 )

Net changes in future development costs

    (36,746 )   (111,830 )   (91,588 )

Sales of oil and gas produced, net

    (6,552 )   (25,788 )   (15,765 )

Purchases of reserves

        85,048     174,645  

Sales of reserves

    (94,357 )       (10,953 )

Extensions and discoveries

    38,256     322,754     207,340  

Revisions of previous quantity estimates

    (54,017 )   (935,281 )   47,699  

Previously estimated development costs incurred

    47,590     89,171     43,802  

Net change in income taxes

    349,339     (392,541 )   (97,089 )

Accretion of discount

    224,235     113,830     57,043  

Other

    380     (133,993 )   50,619  
               

Balance at end of year

  $ 282,012   $ 1,412,543   $ 701,031  
               

F-106


Table of Contents

INDEX TO CANO PETROLEUM, INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Cano Petroleum, Inc.—Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009

   

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 
F-108

Consolidated Statements of Operations

 
F-109

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity

 
F-110

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 
F-111

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 
F-112

F-107


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

In Thousands, Except Shares and Per Share Amounts
  March 31,
2010
  June 30,
2009
 

ASSETS

             

Current assets

             
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 857   $ 392  
 

Accounts receivable

    2,533     2,882  
 

Derivative assets

    3,486     4,955  
 

Assets held for sale (Note 6)

        3,760  
 

Inventory and other current assets

    1,231     810  
           
   

Total current assets

    8,107     12,799  
           

Oil and gas properties, successful efforts method

    292,942     285,063  

Less accumulated depletion and depreciation

    (43,434 )   (40,057 )
           

Net oil and gas properties

    249,508     245,006  
           

Fixed assets and other, net

    2,632     3,240  

Derivative assets

        2,882  

Goodwill

    101     101  
           

TOTAL ASSETS

  $ 260,348   $ 264,028  
           

LIABILITIES, TEMPORARY EQUITY AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

             

Current liabilities

             
 

Accounts payable

  $ 3,830   $ 4,395  
 

Accrued liabilities

    2,364     1,952  
 

Deferred tax liabilities

    898     1,431  
 

Oil and gas sales payable

    730     702  
 

Derivative liabilities

    227     159  
 

Liabilities associated with discontinued operations (Note 6)

    105     123  
 

Current portion of long-term debt (Note 3)

    65,000      
 

Current portion of asset retirement obligations

    236     86  
           
   

Total current liabilities

    73,390     8,848  

Long-term liabilities

             
 

Long-term debt

        55,700  
 

Asset retirement obligations

    3,043     2,785  
 

Derivative liabilities

    3,606      
 

Deferred tax liabilities and other

    17,779     22,831  
           
   

Total liabilities

    97,818     90,164  
           

Temporary equity

             
 

Series D convertible preferred stock and cumulative paid-in-kind dividends; par value $.0001 per share, stated value $1,000 per share; 49,116 shares authorized; 23,849 issued at March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively; liquidation preference at March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009 of $27,822 and $26,987, respectively

    26,240     25,405  
           

Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)

             

Stockholders' equity

             
 

Common stock, par value $.0001 per share; 100,000,000 authorized; 47,273,224 and 45,570,147 shares issued and outstanding, respectively, at March 31, 2010; and 47,297,910 and 45,594,833 shares issued and outstanding, respectively, at June 30, 2009

    5     5  
 

Additional paid-in capital

    190,485     189,526  
 

Accumulated deficit

    (53,503 )   (40,375 )
 

Treasury stock, at cost; 1,703,077 shares held in escrow at March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively

    (697 )   (697 )
           
   

Total stockholders' equity

    136,290     148,459  
           

TOTAL LIABILITIES, TEMPORARY EQUITY AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

  $ 260,348   $ 264,028  
           




See accompanying notes to these unaudited financial statements.

F-108


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

 
  Three Months Ended
March 31,
  Nine Months Ended
March 31,
 
In Thousands, Except Per Share Data
  2010   2009   2010   2009  

Operating Revenues:

                         
 

Crude oil sales

  $ 4,924   $ 2,761   $ 14,045   $ 14,520  
 

Natural gas sales

    879     692     2,323     3,287  
 

Other revenue

        153         312  
                   
   

Total operating revenues

    5,803     3,606     16,368     18,119  
                   

Operating Expenses:

                         
 

Lease operating

    3,598     3,992     11,785     13,687  
 

Production and ad valorem taxes

    476     329     1,365     1,662  
 

General and administrative

    2,912     2,157     9,360     16,561  
 

Exploration expense (Note 11)

            5,024      
 

Impairment of long-lived assets (Note 12)

            283     22,398  
 

Depletion and depreciation

    1,132     1,572     3,627     4,120  
 

Accretion of discount on asset retirement obligations

    68     76     203     225  
                   
   

Total operating expenses

    8,186     8,126     31,647     58,653  
                   

Loss from operations

    (2,383 )   (4,520 )   (15,279 )   (40,534 )

Other income (expense):

                         
 

Interest expense and other

    (486 )   (149 )   (908 )   (357 )
 

Impairment of goodwill

                (685 )
 

Gain (loss) on derivatives

    788     3,486     (4,451 )   48,480  
                   
   

Total other income (expense)

    302     3,337     (5,359 )   47,438  
                   

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

    (2,081 )   (1,183 )   (20,638 )   6,904  

Deferred income tax benefit (expense)

    587     360     6,803     (3,330 )
                   

Income (loss) from continuing operations

    (1,494 )   (823 )   (13,835 )   3,574  

Income from discontinued operations, net of related taxes

    1,722     114     2,066     12,089  
                   

Net income (loss)

    228     (709 )   (11,769 )   15,663  

Preferred stock dividend

   
(470

)
 
(470

)
 
(1,359

)
 
(2,261

)

Preferred stock repurchased for less than carrying amount

                10,890  
                   

Net income (loss) applicable to common stock

  $ (242 ) $ (1,179 ) $ (13,128 ) $ 24,292  
                   

Net income (loss) per share—basic

                         
 

Continuing operations

  $ (0.04 ) $ (0.03 ) $ (0.33 ) $ 0.27  
 

Discontinued operations

    0.04         0.05     0.26  
                   

Net income (loss) per share—basic

  $   $ (0.03 ) $ (0.28 ) $ 0.53  
                   

Net income (loss) per share—diluted

                         
 

Continuing operations

  $ (0.04 ) $ (0.03 ) $ (0.33 ) $ 0.27  
 

Discontinued operations

    0.04         0.05     0.23  
                   

Net income (loss) per share—diluted

  $   $ (0.03 ) $ (0.28 ) $ 0.50  
                   

Weighted average common shares outstanding

                         
 

Basic

    45,570     45,972     45,570     46,094  
                   
 

Diluted

    45,570     45,972     45,570     53,254  
                   




See accompanying notes to these unaudited financial statements.

F-109


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

JULY 1, 2009 THROUGH MARCH 31, 2010

(Unaudited)

 
  Common Stock    
   
  Treasury Stock    
 
 
  Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated Deficit   Total
Stockholders'
Equity
 
Dollar Amounts in Thousands
  Shares   Amount   Shares   Amount  

Balance at July 1, 2009

    47,297,910   $ 5   $ 189,526   $ (40,375 )   1,703,077   $ (697 ) $ 148,459  

Forfeiture and surrender of restricted stock

    (24,686 )       (28 )               (28 )

Stock-based compensation expense

            987                 987  

Preferred stock dividend

                (1,359 )           (1,359 )

Net loss

                (11,769 )           (11,769 )
                               

Balance at March 31, 2010

    47,273,224   $ 5   $ 190,485   $ (53,503 )   1,703,077   $ (697 ) $ 136,290  
                               

See accompanying notes to these unaudited financial statements.

F-110


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

 
  Nine Months Ended March 31,  
In Thousands
  2010   2009  

Cash flow from operating activities:

             
 

Net income (loss)

  $ (11,769 ) $ 15,663  
   

Adjustments needed to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operations:

             
     

Unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives

    8,051     (43,820 )
     

Gain on sale of oil and gas properties

    (2,488 )   (19,244 )
     

Accretion of discount on asset retirement obligations

    205     229  
     

Settlement of asset retirement obligations

    (140 )    
     

Depletion and depreciation

    3,654     4,172  
     

Exploration expense

    5,024      
     

Impairment of oil and gas properties

    283     25,914  
     

Impairment of goodwill

        685  
     

Stock-based compensation expense

    987     2,421  
     

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

    (5,638 )   10,257  
     

Amortization of debt issuance costs and prepaid expenses

    1,300     1,073  
     

Treasury stock

        (126 )
 

Changes in assets and liabilities relating to operations:

             
   

Accounts receivable

    775     2,480  
   

Derivative assets

    (336 )   2,033  
   

Inventory and other current assets and liabilities

    (1,397 )   (1,652 )
   

Accounts payable

    9     (1,541 )
   

Accrued liabilities

    364     (3,288 )
   

Derivative liability

        (367 )
           

Net cash used in operations

    (1,116 )   (5,111 )
           

Cash flow from investing activities:

             
 

Additions to oil and gas properties, fixed assets and other

    (13,445 )   (47,439 )
 

Proceeds from sale of oil and gas properties

    6,300     40,256  
           

Net cash used in investing activities

    (7,145 )   (7,183 )
           

Cash flow from financing activities:

             
 

Repayments of long-term debt

    (3,000 )   (73,500 )
 

Borrowings of long-term debt

    12,300     43,700  
 

Payments for debt issuance costs

        (927 )
 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net

        53,908  
 

Repurchases of preferred stock

        (10,377 )
 

Payment of preferred stock dividend

    (574 )   (954 )
           

Net cash provided by financing activities

    8,726     11,850  
           

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

    465     (444 )

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

    392     771  
           

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $ 857   $ 327  
           

Supplemental disclosure of noncash transactions:

             
 

Payments of preferred stock dividend in kind

  $ 835   $ 1,307  
 

Preferred stock repurchased for less than carrying amount

  $   $ 10,890  

Supplemental disclosure of cash transactions:

             
 

Cash paid during the period for interest

  $ 2,264   $ 1,273  

See accompanying notes to these unaudited financial statements.

F-111


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND USE OF ESTIMATES

Consolidation and Use of Estimates

        The interim consolidated financial statements are unaudited and contain all adjustments (consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for a full year due in part, but not limited to, the volatility in prices for crude oil and natural gas, future prices for commodity derivatives, interest rates, estimates of reserves, drilling risks, geological risks, transportation restrictions, the timing of events, product demand, market competition, interruption in production, our ability to obtain additional capital, and the success of waterflooding and enhanced oil recovery techniques. You should read these consolidated interim financial statements in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009.

        The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") and include the accounts of Cano Petroleum, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries ("Cano"). Intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated. In preparing the accompanying financial statements, management has made certain estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts in the financial statements and disclosures of contingencies. Actual results may differ from those estimates. The computation of stock-based compensation expense requires assumptions such as volatility, expected life and the risk-free interest rate. The computation of mark-to-market valuation of our commodity derivatives includes the observability of quoted market prices and an assessment of potential non-performance of the counterparties. It is possible these estimates could be revised in the near term, and these revisions could be material.

        Significant assumptions are required in the valuation of proved crude oil and natural gas reserves, which may affect the amounts at which crude oil and natural gas properties are recorded. Our estimates of proved reserves materially impact depletion expense. If proved reserves decline, then the rate at which we record depletion expense increases. A decline in estimated proved reserves could result from lower prices, adverse operating results, mechanical problems at our wells and catastrophic events such as fires, hurricanes and floods. Lower prices also may make it uneconomical to drill wells or produce from fields with high operating costs. In addition, a decline in proved reserves may impact our assessment of our oil and natural gas properties for impairment. Our proved reserves estimates are based upon many assumptions, all of which could deviate materially from actual results. As such, reserve estimates may vary materially from the ultimate quantities of crude oil and natural gas actually produced.

New Accounting Pronouncements

        In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued a standard that established the FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM ("ASC") and amended the hierarchy of GAAP such that the ASC became the single source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP. The ASC did not change current GAAP, but was intended to simplify user access to all authoritative GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. All previously existing accounting standard documents were superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the ASC is considered non-authoritative. New accounting standards issued subsequent to June 30, 2009 are communicated by the FASB through Accounting Standards Updates. The ASC

F-112


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND USE OF ESTIMATES (Continued)


became effective for us on July 1, 2009. This standard did not have an impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Throughout the notes to the consolidated financial statements, references that were previously made to various former authoritative GAAP pronouncements have been conformed to the appropriate section of the ASC.

        In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC 805 (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations). Among other things, ASC 805 establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer in a business combination: (i) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquired business; (ii) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or the gain from a bargain purchase; and (iii) determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. ASC 805 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. We adopted ASC 805 on July 1, 2009 with no impact to our consolidated financial statements.

        In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC 810 (formerly SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, An Amendment of ARB No. 51). ASC 810 establishes accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. It also establishes a single method of accounting for changes in a parent's ownership interest in a subsidiary and requires expanded disclosures. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. We adopted ASC 810 on July 1, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In March 2008, the FASB issued ASC 815 (formerly SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—An Amendment of FASB Statement 133). ASC 815 expands the required disclosures to discuss the uses of derivative instruments, the accounting for derivative instruments and related hedged items under ASC 815, and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect the company's financial position, financial performance and cash flows. We adopted ASC 815 on July 1, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In June 2008, the FASB issued ASC 260 (formerly EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities). ASC 260 addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and need to be included in the calculation of earnings per share under the two-class method. Under ASC 260, share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are "participating securities", and therefore should be included in computing earnings per share using the two-class method. ASC 260 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008. We adopted ASC 260 on July 1, 2009. The effect of adopting ASC 260 increased the number of shares used to compute our earnings per share; however, the adoption of ASC 260 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In December 2008, the FASB issued ASC 815 (formerly EITF 07-5, Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity's Own Stock). ASC 815 affects companies that have provisions in their securities purchase agreements that provide for the reset of the current

F-113


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND USE OF ESTIMATES (Continued)


conversion price based upon new issuances by companies at prices below certain thresholds. Securities purchase agreements with such provisions will require the embedded derivative instrument to be bifurcated and separately accounted for as a derivative. Subject to certain exceptions, our preferred stock provides for resetting the conversion price if we issue new common stock below $5.75 per share. ASC 815 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008. We adopted ASC 815 on July 1, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows as the reset conversion provision did not meet the definition of a derivative since it was not readily net-cash settled.

        In December 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") issued the final rule, Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting. The new disclosure requirements include provisions that permit the use of new technologies to determine proved reserves if those technologies lead to reliable conclusions about reserve quantities. The new requirements also will allow companies to disclose their probable and possible reserves to investors. In addition, the new disclosure requirements specify for companies to: (a) report the independence and qualifications of its reserves preparer or auditor; (b) file reports when a third party is relied upon to prepare reserves estimates or conducts a reserves audit; and (c) report oil and gas reserves using an average price based upon the prior 12-month period rather than year-end prices. The new disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending on or after December 31, 2009. On April 20, 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-14, which became effective on January 1, 2010, to reflect changes to fossil fuel exploration and production technology over the past several decades. We are not required to conform to these SEC requirements until we file our annual report for our fiscal year ending June 30, 2010. The effect of adopting the SEC rule has not been determined; however, it is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 855 (formerly SFAS 165, Subsequent Events) to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date, but prior to the issuance of financial statements. Specifically, ASC 855 sets forth: (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; (2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and (3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. ASC 855 is effective for financial statements issued for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted ASC 855 on June 30, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

2. PENDING MERGER WITH RESACA

        On September 29, 2009, the boards of directors of Cano and Resaca Exploitation, Inc. ("Resaca"), a Texas corporation, approved an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") by and among Cano, Resaca and Resaca Acquisition Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Resaca ("Merger Sub"), pursuant to which Merger Sub will be merged with and into Cano (the "Merger") and Cano will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resaca. Closing is anticipated before the end of June 2010; however, it is possible that factors outside of either company's control could require us to complete the Merger at a later time or not to complete it at all.

F-114


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2. PENDING MERGER WITH RESACA (Continued)

        Under the terms of the proposed Merger, each share of Cano common stock will be converted into the right to receive 2.10 shares of common stock of Resaca (or 0.42 shares of Resaca common stock after the proposed one-for-five reverse stock split is approved by the Resaca shareholders prior to the Merger) and each share of Cano Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (the "Preferred Stock") will be converted into the right to receive one share of Resaca Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. The Merger is intended to be a tax-free transaction to the Cano stockholders to the extent that the Cano common stockholders receive Resaca common stock and the Cano preferred stockholders receive Resaca preferred stock as Merger consideration.

        Consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement is conditioned upon, among other things: (1) approval of the holders of Cano common stock and Cano preferred stock, (2) approval of the holders of Resaca common stock, (3) the listing of Resaca common stock on the NYSE Amex, (4) the refinancing of existing bank debt of Resaca and Cano, (5) the receipt of required regulatory approvals, (6) Resaca's application for readmission to the AIM Market of the London Stock Exchange, which is anticipated to occur simultaneous with the closing of the merger and (7) the effectiveness of a registration statement relating to the shares of Resaca common stock to be issued in conjunction with the Merger. The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for each of Cano and Resaca, including the right to terminate the Merger Agreement and to enter into a Superior Proposal (as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement). In the event of a termination of the Merger Agreement under certain specified circumstances described in the Merger Agreement, one party will be required to pay the other party a termination fee of $3,500,000.

        On February 3, 2010, Resaca received a commitment for a new $200.0 million revolving senior secured credit facility with Union Bank of North America, N.A. ("UBNA") for the combined company. UBNA is the administrative agent and issuing lender of the revolving senior secured credit facility. The facility has a maturity of July 1, 2012 and is expected to have an initial borrowing base of $90.0 million based upon the combined company's estimated proved reserves.

        On February 24, 2010, Cano and Resaca entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Merger Agreement, which extends the date on which either Cano or Resaca may terminate the Merger Agreement if the Merger has not become effective from February 28, 2010 to April 30, 2010.

        On March 30, 2010, the shares of Resaca common stock to be issued in the Merger were approved for listing on the NYSE Amex.

        On April 1, 2010, Cano and Resaca entered into Amendment No. 2 of the Merger Agreement, which extends the date on which either Cano or Resaca may terminate the Merger Agreement if the Merger has not become effective from April 30, 2010 to May 31, 2010, clarifies the rights of holders of Resaca Series A Preferred Stock with respect to issuances of securities by Resaca, and provides that, for the one year period following closing of the Merger, Resaca's board committees shall consist of three or four directors (rather than four directors), with no less than two former Cano directors on each committee.

        On April 5, 2010, Cano and Resaca entered into an investors' rights agreement with the holders of the Preferred Stock. The investors' rights agreement grants such shareholders substantially similar registration and other rights currently associated with the Cano Preferred Stock with respect to the shares of Resaca preferred stock to be received by them upon consummation of the Merger. Upon the consummation of the Merger, the Investors Rights Agreement will transfer the rights and obligations of

F-115


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2. PENDING MERGER WITH RESACA (Continued)


Cano under that certain Securities Purchase Agreement, dated August 25, 2006, by and among Cano and the holders of the Cano Preferred Stock (the "SPA") and that certain Registration Rights Agreement, dated August 25, 2006, by and among Cano and the holders of the Cano Preferred Stock (the "Registration Rights Agreement") to Resaca and amends and restates the terms of the SPA and the Registration Rights Agreement. The Investors Rights Agreement shall not become effective until the closing of the Merger.

        S. Jeffrey Johnson, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our board of directors, owns approximately 3.6% of the Preferred Stock. During the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2010, we paid preferred dividend payments to Mr. Johnson of approximately $20,000 and $59,000, respectively.

        On April 28, 2010, Cano and Resaca entered into Amendment No. 3 of the Merger Agreement, which extends the date on which either Cano or Resaca may terminate the Merger Agreement if the Merger has not become effective from May 31, 2010 to June 30, 2010.

        On April 29, 2010, Resaca filed Amendment No. 3 to its registration statement covering a proposed underwritten offering of Resaca common stock, which is expected to close in conjunction with the closing of the Merger.

3. LIQUIDITY

        At March 31, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of $0.9 million. We had negative working capital of $65.3 million, which includes $65.0 million of long-term debt that was shown as a current liability. Excluding the current portion of long-term debt totaling $65.0 million, we had negative working capital of $0.3 million. For the nine-month period ended March 31, 2010, we had cash flow used in operations of $1.1 million and we incurred $1.7 million of Merger-related expenses.

        As discussed in Note 6, on January 27, 2010, we sold our interests in certain oil and gas properties located in the Texas Panhandle for net proceeds of $6.3 million. We used a portion of the net proceeds to pay down our outstanding debt. As of May 12, 2010, we had available borrowing capacity of $1.1 million and a cash balance of $0.8 million.

        As discussed in Note 4, the lenders under our two credit agreements agreed to waive the covenants relating to our leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio for the quarters ended December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010, as we would have been out of compliance with such covenants as of both dates. Should the merger with Resaca not close by June 30, 2010, based upon our nine-month operating results through March 31, 2010, it is likely that we will not be in compliance with one or more of our financial covenants under our credit agreements as of June 30, 2010. Accordingly, since we did not receive covenant relief beyond March 31, 2010, our debt is classified as a current liability. Further, we will continue to seek covenant relief from our lenders, though there can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining such relief. If we are unable to obtain relief from our lenders, we will need to raise additional capital through the issuance of equity or the sale of a portion of our assets. There can be no assurance as to funding we would be able to raise, if any, in connection with any such equity issuances or asset sales. In addition, any such equity issuances could be highly dilutive to our existing stockholders and any such asset sales would require the consent of our lenders and, potentially, the holders of our outstanding common and Preferred Stock.

F-116


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

3. LIQUIDITY (Continued)

        Our credit agreements, discussed in Note 4, include change of control provisions which require us to refinance the credit agreements at the close of the Merger. As discussed in Note 2, on February 3, 2010, Resaca received a commitment for a new $200.0 million revolving senior secured credit facility with UBNA for the combined company.

        We believe the combination of cash on hand, cash flow generated from operations, and available borrowing capacity, as of May 12, 2010, will be sufficient to fund our operating and capital activities through the closing of the Merger, which is anticipated to occur in June 2010.

4. DEBT

        At March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, the aggregate outstanding amounts under our credit agreements were $65.0 million and $55.7 million, respectively. The $65.0 million consisted of outstanding borrowings under the amended and restated credit agreement (the "ARCA") and the subordinated credit agreement (the "SCA") of $50.0 million and $15.0 million, respectively, all of which is classified as a current liability. At March 31, 2010, the average interest rates under the ARCA and the subordinated credit agreement were 2.75% and 6.26%, respectively.

        Our debt consists of the ARCA and our subordinated credit agreement. Under the ARCA, our lenders are UBNA, acting as administrative agent, and Natixis. Under the subordinated credit agreement, our lender is UnionBanCal Equities, Inc. ("UBE").

        On December 30, 2009, we entered into Amendment No. 1 (the "ARCA Amendment No. 1") to the ARCA, which specifies (i) our borrowing base was redetermined to be $60.0 million, which will remain in effect until it is redetermined in accordance with the ARCA, (ii) advances under the ARCA for any purpose other than to acquire proved, developed, producing oil and gas properties shall not exceed $52.0 million and (iii) the covenants relating to our leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio were waived for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2009 as we would have been out of compliance with such covenants as of December 31, 2009. We paid an amendment fee of $90,000 pursuant to the ARCA Amendment No. 1.

        On March 30, 2010, Cano entered into Amendment No. 2 to the ARCA, which specifies the covenants relating to our leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio were waived for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2010. The amendment also specifies that if the ARCA has not been replaced, refinanced, or amended and restated on or before May 31, 2010, then we must pay an amendment fee amount of $90,000 on May 31, 2010.

        As of May 12, 2010, the ARCA had outstanding borrowings of $50.9 million, and available borrowing capacity of $1.1 million.

        On December 30, 2009, we entered into Amendment No. 1 (the "SCA Amendment") to the SCA, which specifies the covenants relating to our leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio were waived for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2009. We paid an amendment fee of $22,500 pursuant to the SCA Amendment.

        On March 30, 2010, we entered into Amendment No. 2 to the SCA, which specifies the covenants relating to our leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio were waived for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2010. The amendment also specifies that if the SCA has not been terminated on or before May 31, 2010, then we must pay an amendment fee amount of $22,500 on May 31, 2010.

F-117


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

5. DERIVATIVES

        Our derivatives consist of commodity derivatives and an interest rate swap arrangement.

Commodity Derivatives

        Pursuant to the ARCA and the SCA, discussed in Note 4, we are required to maintain our "collar" commodity derivative contracts. We entered into commodity derivative contracts to partially mitigate the risk associated with extreme fluctuations of prices for crude oil and natural gas sales. We have no obligation to enter into commodity derivative contracts in the future. Should we choose to enter into commodity derivative contracts to mitigate future price risk, we cannot enter into contracts for greater than 85% of our crude oil and natural gas production volumes attributable to proved producing reserves for a given month. As of March 31, 2010, we maintained the following "collar" commodity derivative contracts with UBNA as our counterparty, which is one of the senior lenders under the ARCA:

Time Period
  Floor
Oil Price
  Ceiling
Oil Price
  Barrels
Per Day
  Floor
Gas Price
  Ceiling
Gas Price
  Mcf
per Day
  Barrels of
Equivalent
Oil per Day(a)
 

4/1/10 - 12/31/10

  $ 80.00   $ 108.20     333   $ 7.75   $ 9.85     1,567     594  

4/1/10 - 12/31/10

  $ 85.00   $ 101.50     233   $ 8.00   $ 9.40     1,033     406  

1/1/11 - 3/31/11

  $ 80.00   $ 107.30     333   $ 7.75   $ 11.60     1,467     578  

1/1/11 - 3/31/11

  $ 85.00   $ 100.50     200   $ 8.00   $ 11.05     967     361  

(a)
Computed by dividing the "Mcf per Day" by 6 and adding "Barrels per Day."

        On September 11, 2009, we entered into two fixed price commodity swap contracts with Natixis as our counterparty, which is one of our lenders under the ARCA. The fixed price swaps are based on West Texas Intermediate NYMEX prices and are summarized in the table below.

Time Period
  Fixed
Oil Price
  Barrels
Per Day
 

4/1/11 - 12/31/11

  $ 75.90     700  

1/1/12 - 12/31/12

  $ 77.25     700  

Interest Rate Swap Agreement

        On January 12, 2009, we entered into a three-year LIBOR interest rate basis swap contract with Natixis Financial Products, Inc. ("Natixis FPI") for $20.0 million in notional exposure. We entered into the interest rate swap agreement to partially mitigate the risk associated with interest rate fluctuations on our interest expense. Under the terms of the transaction, we will pay Natixis FPI, in three-month intervals, a fixed rate of 1.73% and Natixis FPI will pay Cano the prevailing three-month LIBOR rate.

F-118


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

5. DERIVATIVES (Continued)

        During the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, the gain (loss) on derivatives reported in our consolidated statements of operations is summarized as follows (in thousands):

 
   
  Three Months Ended
March 31,
  Nine Months Ended
March 31,
 
 
  Location of Gain (Loss) on Derivatives  
 
  2010   2009   2010   2009  

Settlements received/accrued on commodity derivatives

  Other income (expense)   $ 753   $ 2,846   $ 3,799   $ 4,558  

Settlements received—sale of "floor price" contracts on commodity derivatives

  Other income (expense)                 653  

Settlements paid/accrued on commodity derivatives

  Other income (expense)                 (551 )

Settlements paid/accrued on interest rate swap

  Other income (expense)     (74 )       (199 )    
                       

Realized gain on derivatives

  Other income (expense)     679     2,846     3,600     4,660  

Unrealized gain (loss) on commodity derivatives

  Other income (expense)     233     716     (7,754 )   43,896  

Unrealized loss on interest rate swap

  Other income (expense)     (124 )   (76 )   (297 )   (76 )
                       

Gain (loss) on derivatives

  Other income (expense)   $ 788   $ 3,486   $ (4,451 ) $ 48,480  
                       

        The realized gain (loss) on derivatives consists of actual cash settlements under our commodity collar and interest rate swap derivative agreements during the respective periods. The cash settlements received/accrued by us under commodity derivatives were cumulative monthly payments due to us since the NYMEX natural gas and crude oil prices were lower than the "floor prices" set for the respective time periods and realized gains from the sale of uncovered "floor price" contracts as discussed below. The cash settlements paid/accrued by us under commodity derivatives were cumulative monthly payments due to our counterparty since the NYMEX crude oil and natural gas prices were higher than the "ceiling prices" set for the respective time periods. The cash settlements paid/accrued by us under the interest rate swap related to quarterly payments to our counterparty since the actual three-month LIBOR interest rate was lower than the fixed 1.73% rate we pay to the counterparty. The cash flows relating to the derivative instrument settlements that are due, but not cash settled are reflected in operating activities on our consolidated statements of cash flows as changes to current liabilities. At March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, we had recorded a receivable from our counterparty included in accounts receivable on our consolidated balance sheet of $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively.

        During October 2008, we sold certain uncovered "floor price" commodity derivative contracts to our counterparty for $3.2 million and realized a gain of $0.7 million.

        The unrealized gain (loss) on commodity derivatives represents estimated future settlements under our commodity derivatives and is based on mark-to-market valuation based on assumptions of forward prices, volatility and the time value of money as discussed below. We compared our internally derived valuation to our counterparties' independently derived valuation to further validate our mark-to-market valuation. During the three-month period ended March 31, 2010, we recognized an unrealized gain in our consolidated statements of operations amounting to $0.2 million. During the nine-month period ended March 31, 2010, we recognized an unrealized loss on commodity derivatives in our consolidated statements of operations amounting to $7.8 million. During the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2009, we recognized an unrealized gain on commodity derivatives in our consolidated statements of operations amounting to $0.7 million and $43.9 million, respectively.

F-119


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

5. DERIVATIVES (Continued)

        The unrealized loss on interest rate swap represents estimated future settlements under our aforementioned interest rate swap agreement and is based on a mark-to-market valuation based on assumptions of interest rates, volatility and the time value of money as discussed below. During the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2010, we recognized realized losses on interest rate swaps in our consolidated statements of operations amounting to $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. During the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2010, we recognized unrealized losses on interest rate swaps in our consolidated statements of operations amounting to $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively. During the three- and nine-month period ended March 31, 2009, we recognized unrealized losses on interest rate swaps in our consolidated statements of operations amounting to $0.1 million for each period.

Fair Value Measurements

        Our assets and liabilities recorded at fair value are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. A fair value hierarchy has been established that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement). We classify fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

        Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

        Level 2—Inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable. These inputs are either directly observable in the marketplace or indirectly observable through corroboration with market data for substantially the full contractual term of the asset or liability being measured.

        Level 3—Inputs reflect management's best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the model.

        In valuing certain contracts, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. For disclosure purposes, assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety in the fair value hierarchy level based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the overall fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

        The fair value of our derivative contracts are measured using Level 2 and Level 3 inputs. The Level 3 input pertained to the subjective valuation for the effect of our own credit risk, which was significant to the fair value of the crude oil swap derivative contracts. The fair value of our commodity derivative contracts and interest rate swap are measured using Level 2 inputs based on the hierarchies previously discussed.

        We estimate our asset retirement obligations pursuant to the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 410, "Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations." The income valuation technique we utilize to determine the fair value of the liability at inception applies a credit-adjusted risk-free rate, which takes into account the our credit risk, the time value of money, and the current economic state, to the

F-120


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

5. DERIVATIVES (Continued)


undiscounted expected abandonment cash flows. Given the unobservable nature of the inputs, the initial measurement of the asset retirement obligation liability is deemed to use Level 3 inputs.

        The estimated fair value of derivatives included in the consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2010 is summarized below.

In thousands
   
 

Derivative assets (Level 2):

       
 

Crude oil collars and price floors—current

  $ 712  
 

Natural gas collars and price floors—current

    2,774  

Derivative liability (Level 2)

       
 

Interest rate swap—current

    (227 )
 

Interest rate swap—noncurrent

    (18 )

Derivative liability (Level 3)

       
 

Crude oil swap—noncurrent

    (3,588 )
       

Net derivative liabilities

  $ (347 )
       

        At September 30, 2009, our net derivative asset was classified as Level 2 as the subjectivity of our valuation for the effect of our own credit risk was insignificant. At December 31, 2009, since the subjective valuation of our own credit risk is significant, we reclassified our derivative liabilities as Level 3. At March 31, 2010, we continue to classify our derivative liabilities as Level 3 as presented in the table below.

In thousands
  Beginning
Balance
  Total
Gains
(Losses)(a)
  Purchases,
Sales,
Issuances,
and
Settlements,
net
  Transfers
into
Level 3
  Ending
balance
  Unrealized Gains
(Losses) for Level 3
Assets/Liabilities
Outstanding at
March 31, 2010
 

Derivatives assets (liabilities)

  $   $ (2,944 ) $   $ (644 ) $ (3,588 ) $ (3,588 )

(a)
Total realized and unrealized gains are included in gain (loss) on commodity derivatives in the consolidated statements of operations.

        The following table shows the reconciliation of changes in the fair value of the net derivative assets classified as Level 2 and 3, respectively, in the fair value hierarchy for the nine-month period ended March 31, 2010 (in thousands).

In thousands
  Total Net
Derivative
Assets
(Liabilities)
 

Balance at June 30, 2009

  $ 7,678  
 

Unrealized loss on derivatives

    (8,051 )
 

Settlements, net

    26  
       

Balance at March 31, 2010

  $ (347 )
       

        The change from net derivative assets of $7.7 million at June 30, 2009 to net derivative liabilities of $0.3 million at March 31, 2010 is attributable to the increases in crude oil and natural gas futures

F-121


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

5. DERIVATIVES (Continued)


prices. These amounts are based on our mark-to-market valuation of these derivatives at March 31, 2010 and may not be indicative of actual future cash settlements.

        The following table summarizes the fair value of our derivative contracts as of the dates indicated:

 
  Asset Derivatives   Liability Derivatives  
 
  March 31, 2010   June 30, 2009   March 31, 2010   June 30, 2009  
In thousands
  Balance
Sheet
Location
  Fair
Value
  Balance
Sheet
Location
  Fair
Value
  Balance
Sheet
Location
  Fair
Value
  Balance
Sheet
Location
  Fair
Value
 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

                                         
 

Commodity derivative contracts

  Derivatives—current   $ 3,486   Derivatives—current   $ 4,955   Derivatives—current   $   Derivatives—current   $  
 

Commodity derivative contracts

  Derivatives—noncurrent       Derivatives—noncurrent     2,670   Derivatives—noncurrent     (3,588 ) Derivatives—noncurrent      
 

Interest rate swaps

  Derivatives—current       Derivatives—current       Derivatives—current     (227 ) Derivatives—current     (159 )
 

Interest rate swaps

  Derivatives—noncurrent       Derivatives—noncurrent     212   Derivatives—noncurrent     (18 ) Derivatives—noncurrent      
                                   

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

      $ 3,486       $ 7,837       $ (3,833 )     $ (159 )
                                   

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments

      $       $       $       $  
                                   

Total derivatives

      $ 3,486       $ 7,837       $ (3,833 )     $ (159 )
                                   

6. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

        On October 1, 2008, we completed the sale of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Pantwist, LLC, for a net purchase price of $40.0 million consisting of a $42.7 million purchase price adjusted for $2.1 million of net cash received from discontinued operations during the three months ended September 30, 2008 and $0.6 million of advisory fees. The sale had an effective date of July 1, 2008.

        On December 2, 2008, we completed the sale of our Corsicana oil and gas properties (the "Corsicana Properties") for $0.3 million. In the three-month period ended September 30, 2008, we recorded a $3.5 million ($2.3 million after-tax) impairment of the Corsicana Properties, as we determined that we would not be developing its proved undeveloped reserves within the next five years.

        On January 27, 2010, we completed the sale of our interests in certain oil and gas properties located in the Texas Panhandle ("Certain Panhandle Properties") for net proceeds of $6.3 million, subject to customary post-closing adjustments which resulted in a pre-tax gain of $2.6 million, based on updated reserve information as of December 31, 2009. The sale had an effective date of January 1, 2010.

        The operating results of Pantwist, LLC, the Corsicana Properties and the Certain Panhandle Properties for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 have been

F-122


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

6. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (Continued)


reclassified as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations as detailed in the table below (in thousands).

 
  Three Months Ended
March 31,
  Nine Months Ended
March 31,
 
In Thousands
  2010   2009   2010   2009  

Operating Revenues:

                         
 

Crude oil sales

  $ 12   $ 13   $ 35   $ 1,378  
 

Natural gas sales

    153     370     972     3,317  
                   
   

Total operating revenues

    165     383     1,007     4,695  
                   

Operating Expenses:

                         
 

Lease operating

    23     79     178     865  
 

Production and ad valorem taxes

    11     46     118     389  
 

Impairment of long-lived assets

                3,516  
 

Depletion and depreciation

        13     27     52  
 

Accretion of discount on asset retirement obligations

            2     4  
 

Interest expense, net

    8     16     43     96  
                   
   

Total operating expenses

    42     154     368     4,922  
                   

Gain (loss) on sale of properties

    2,591     (65 )   2,591     19,244  
                   

Income before income taxes

    2,714     164     3,230     19,017  

Income tax provision

    (992 )   (50 )   (1,164 )   (6,928 )
                   

Income from discontinued operations

  $ 1,722   $ 114   $ 2,066   $ 12,089  
                   

        Interest expense, net of interest income, was allocated to discontinued operations based on the percentage of operating revenues applicable to discontinued operations to the total operating revenues.

        At June 30, 2009, on our consolidated balance sheet, the assets relating to the Certain Panhandle Properties are classified as assets held for sale and the liabilities are classified as liabilities associated with discontinued operations.

7. DEFERRED COMPENSATION

        As of March 31, 2010, we had non-vested restricted shares totaling 386,668 shares to key employees pursuant to our 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as summarized below:

 
  Shares   Weighted
Average
Grant-date
Fair Value
  Fair Value
$000s
 

Non-vested restricted shares at June 30, 2009

    480,001   $ 6.97   $ 3,344  

Shares vested

    (68,647 ) $ 5.84   $ (401 )

Shares forfeited

    (24,686 ) $ 5.84     (144 )
               

Non-vested restricted shares at March 31, 2010

    386,668   $ 7.24   $ 2,799  
               

        The restricted share grants will vest to the employees based on future years of service ranging from one to three years depending on the life of the award agreement. Pursuant to the Merger

F-123


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

7. DEFERRED COMPENSATION (Continued)


discussed in Note 2, any non-vested restricted shares will vest upon the completion of the Merger. The fair value of the grants is based on our actual stock price on the date of grant multiplied by the number of restricted shares granted. As of March 31, 2010, the grant date value of non-vested restricted shares amounted to $2.8 million. For the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we have expensed $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively, to stock compensation expense based on amortizing the fair value over the appropriate service period. For the nine-month period ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we have expensed $0.8 million and $1.8 million, respectively, to stock compensation expense. The shares forfeited represent shares used to satisfy employees' tax withholding obligations related to the vesting of their restricted shares.

8. STOCK OPTIONS

        During the nine-month period ended March 31, 2010, we granted 16,032 stock options to two directors under our 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The options were granted with an exercise price equal to our market price at the date of grant and vest immediately. The factors used to calculate the fair value of these options are summarized in the table below:

No. of options

    16,032  

Risk free interest rate

    2.19 %

Expected life

    5 years  

Expected volatility

    98.9 %

Expected dividend yield

    0 %

Weighted average grant date fair value

  $ 0.77  

        The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our common stock. We use historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination within the valuation model. The expected lives of options granted represent the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the five-year U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the respective grant. The expected dividend yield reflects our intent not to pay dividends on our common stock during the contractual periods.

        A summary of outstanding options as of March 31, 2010 is as follows:

 
  Shares   Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 

Outstanding at June 30, 2009

    1,400,002   $ 4.42  

Options granted

    16,032   $ 1.03  

Options forfeited

    (86,017 ) $ 5.24  
           

Outstanding at March 31, 2010

    1,330,017   $ 4.33  
           

        Based on our $1.17 stock price at March 31, 2010, the intrinsic value of both the options outstanding and exercisable was approximately $0.2 million.

        Total options exercisable at March 31, 2010 amounted to 1,127,845 shares and had a weighted average exercise price of $4.12. Upon exercise, we issue the full amount of shares exercisable per the terms of the options from new shares. We have no plans to repurchase those shares in the future.

F-124


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

8. STOCK OPTIONS (Continued)

        For each of the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we recorded charges to stock compensation expense of $0.1 million for the estimated fair value of the options granted to our directors and employees. For each of the nine-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we recorded charges to stock compensation expense of $0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2010, total compensation cost related to non-vested option awards not yet recognized was $0.2 million. We expect to recognize the remaining unrecognized amount over the related requisite service periods of one to three years. Pursuant to the Merger discussed in Note 2, the outstanding stock options will vest upon completion of the Merger.

9. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

        Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed in the same manner, but also considers the effect of common stock shares underlying stock options, the preferred stock and paid-in-kind ("PIK") dividends on an "as-converted" basis.

        Shares of common stock underlying the following items were not included in dilutive weighted average shares outstanding for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2010, and for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 as their effects would have been anti-dilutive.

 
  March 31,  
 
  2010   2009  

Stock options

    1,330,017     1,407,512  

Preferred stock

    4,147,652     4,147,652  

PIK dividends

    690,954     497,378  

        The following table reconciles earnings and shares used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the nine-month period ended March 31, 2009:

 
  Nine Months Ended
March 31, 2009
 
In thousands, except per share data
  Earnings
($000)
  Shares   Earnings
per Share
 

Basic

  $ 24,292     46,094   $ 0.53  
                   

Effective of dilutive securities:

                   
 

Conversion of preferred stock and PIK dividends

    2,261     6,945        
 

Stock options

        215        
                 

Diluted

  $ 26,553     53,254   $ 0.50  
               

10. INCOME TAXES

        The effective income tax rates for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2010 were 28.2% and 33.0%, respectively. The effective income tax rates for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2009 were 30.4% and 48.2%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the nine-month period ended March 31, 2009 was higher due to an increase in the state tax rate.

F-125


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

11. COSTS INCURRED FOR DRILLING AND EQUIPPING EXPLORATORY WELLS USING SECONDARY AND TERTIARY TECHNOLOGY

        At June 30, 2009, we had one tertiary project, the alkaline-surfactant-polymer chemical injection pilot project at our Nowata Properties (the "Nowata ASP Project"), that was pending the determination of whether proved reserves have been found. During December 2009, we finalized our performance analysis, which indicated the Nowata ASP Project did not result in increased oil production of significant quantities to be considered economically sufficient to justify the recognition of proved reserves. Accordingly, during December 2009, we recorded a $5.0 million pre-tax exploration expense.

        The following table reflects the net change in deferred exploratory project costs during the nine-month period ended March 31, 2010 for the Nowata ASP Project:

In Thousands
   
 

Balance at June 30, 2009

  $ 4,849  

Additions pending the determination of proved reserves

    175  

Deferred exploratory well costs charged to expense

    (5,024 )
       

Balance at March 31, 2010

  $  
       

12. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS

        During the three-month period ended December 31, 2009, we wrote down $0.3 million of costs associated with the ASP facility used for the Nowata ASP Project. The facility's water filtering process did not work properly with the oil-water fluid production at our Nowata Properties. We intend to use the ASP facility for future pilot tertiary projects at our Cato and Panhandle Properties.

        During the three-month period ended December 31, 2008, we recorded a $22.4 million pre-tax impairment to our Barnett Shale natural gas properties ("Barnett Shale Properties") and a $0.7 million pre-tax impairment to the goodwill associated with our subsidiary which holds the equity in our Barnett Shale Properties. We recorded the impairments due to the decline in commodity prices which created an uncertainty in the likelihood of developing reserves associated with our Barnett Shale Properties within the next five years. The fair value for our Barnett Shale Properties was determined using estimates of future net cash flows, discounted to a present value, which is considered "Level 3" inputs as previously discussed in Note 5.

13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Burnett Case

        On March 23, 2006, the following lawsuit was filed in the 100th Judicial District Court in Carson County, Texas: Cause No. 9840, The Tom L. and Anne Burnett Trust, by Anne Burnett Windfohr, Windi Phillips, Ben Fortson, Jr., George Beggs, III and Ed Hudson, Jr. as Co-Trustees; Anne Burnett Windfohr; and Burnett Ranches, Ltd. v. Cano Petroleum, Inc., W.O. Energy of Nevada, Inc., W. O. Operating Company, Ltd. and WO Energy, Inc. The plaintiffs claim that the electrical wiring and equipment of Cano or certain of its subsidiaries relating to oil and natural gas operations started a wildfire that began on March 12, 2006 in Carson County, Texas.

        The plaintiffs (i) allege negligence and gross negligence and (ii) seek damages, including, but not limited to, damages for damage to their land and livestock, certain expenses related to fighting the fire

F-126


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)


and certain remedial expenses totaling approximately $1.7 million to $1.8 million. In addition, the plaintiffs seek (i) termination of certain oil and natural gas leases, (ii) reimbursement for their attorney's fees (in the amount of at least $549,000) and (iii) exemplary damages. The plaintiffs also claim that Cano and its subsidiaries are jointly and severally liable as a single business enterprise and/or a general partnership or de facto partnership. The owner of the remainder of the mineral estate, Texas Christian University, intervened in the suit on August 18, 2006, joining Plaintiffs' request to terminate certain oil and gas leases. On June 21, 2007, the judge of the 100th Judicial District Court issued a Final Judgment (a) granting motions for summary judgment in favor of Cano and certain of its subsidiaries on plaintiffs' claims for (i) breach of contract/termination of an oil and gas lease; and (ii) negligence; and (b) granting the plaintiffs' no-evidence motion for summary judgment on contributory negligence, assumption of risk, repudiation and estoppel affirmative defenses asserted by Cano and certain of its subsidiaries.

        The Final Judgment was appealed and a decision was reached on March 11, 2009, as the Court of Appeals for the Tenth District of Texas in Amarillo affirmed in part and reversed in part the ruling of the 100th Judicial District Court. The Court of Appeals (a) affirmed the trial court's granting of summary judgment in Cano's favor for breach of contract/termination of an oil and gas lease and (b) reversed the trial court's granting of summary judgment in Cano's favor on plaintiffs' claims of Cano's negligence. The Court of Appeals ordered the case remanded to the 100th Judicial District Court. On March 30, 2009, the plaintiffs filed a motion for rehearing with the Court of Appeals and requested a rehearing on the trial court's ruling in favor of the defendants on the plaintiffs' breach of contract/termination of an oil and gas lease claim. On June 30, 2009, the Court of Appeals ruled to deny the plaintiffs' motion for rehearing. On August 17, 2009 we filed an appeal with the Texas Supreme Court to request the reversal of the Court of Appeals ruling regarding our potential negligence. On December 11, 2009, the Texas Supreme Court declined to hear Cano's appeal. Therefore, this case will be remanded to the district court for trial on the negligence claims.

        Due to the inherent risk of litigation, the ultimate outcome of this case is uncertain and unpredictable. At this time, Cano management continues to believe that this lawsuit is without merit and will continue to vigorously defend itself and its subsidiaries, while seeking cost-effective solutions to resolve this lawsuit. Based on our knowledge and judgment of the facts as of May 12, 2010, we believe our financial statements present fairly the effect of the actual and the anticipated future costs to resolve this matter as of March 31, 2010.

        There is no remaining insurance coverage for any claims associated with this fire litigation.

Securities Litigation

        On October 2, 2008, a lawsuit (08 CV 8462) was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against David W. Wehlmann; Gerald W. Haddock; Randall Boyd; Donald W. Niemiec; Robert L. Gaudin; William O. Powell, III and the underwriters of the June 26, 2008 public offering of Cano common stock ("Secondary Offering") alleging violations of the federal securities laws. Messrs. Wehlmann, Haddock, Boyd, Niemiec, Gaudin and Powell were Cano outside directors on June 26, 2008. At the defendants' request, the case was transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (4:09-CV-308-A).

        On July 2, 2009, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint that added as defendants Cano, Cano's Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, Jeff Johnson, Cano's former Senior Vice President

F-127


Table of Contents


CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)


and Chief Financial Officer, Morris B. "Sam" Smith, Cano's current Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Ben Daitch, Cano's Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer, Michael Ricketts and Cano's Senior Vice President of Engineering and Operations, Patrick McKinney, and dismissed Gerald W. Haddock, a former director of Cano, as a defendant. The amended complaint alleges that the prospectus for the Secondary Offering contained statements regarding Cano's proved reserve amounts and standards that were materially false and overstated Cano's proved reserves. The plaintiff is seeking to certify the lawsuit as a class action lawsuit and is seeking an unspecified amount of damages. On July 27, 2009, the defendants moved to dismiss the lawsuit. On December 3, 2009, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas granted motions to dismiss all claims brought by the plaintiffs. On December 18, 2009, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. On April 5, 2010, Cano filed its appellate brief to support its position. On April 19, 2010, the plaintiffs filed their response brief. Due to the inherent risk of litigation, the outcome of this lawsuit is uncertain and unpredictable; however, Cano, its officers and its outside directors intend to continue to vigorously defend the lawsuit.

        Cano is cooperating with its directors and officers liability insurance carrier regarding the defense of the lawsuit. We believe that the potential amount of losses resulting from this lawsuit in the future, if any, will not exceed the policy limits of Cano's directors' and officers' liability insurance.

Other

        Occasionally, we are involved in other various claims and lawsuits and certain governmental proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Our management does not believe that the ultimate resolution of any current matters that are not set forth above will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations. Management's position is supported, in part, by the existence of insurance coverage, indemnification and escrow accounts. None of our directors, officers or affiliates, owners of record or beneficial owners of more than five percent of any class of our voting securities, or security holder is involved in a proceeding adverse to us or our subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to us or our subsidiaries.

F-128


Table of Contents


ANNEX A

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
By and Among
RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC.
RESACA ACQUISITION SUB, INC.
and
CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

Dated September 29, 2009


Table of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ARTICLE I THE MERGER

  A-1
   

1.1

 

The Merger

  A-1
   

1.2

 

Effective Time of the Merger

  A-1
   

1.3

 

Tax Treatment

  A-1

ARTICLE II THE SURVIVING CORPORATION

 
A-1
   

2.1

 

Certificate of Incorporation

  A-1
   

2.2

 

Bylaws

  A-1
   

2.3

 

Directors and Officers

  A-2

ARTICLE III CONVERSION OF SHARES

 
A-2
   

3.1

 

Conversion of Capital Stock

  A-2
   

3.2

 

Stock Options; Restricted Stock

  A-3
   

3.3

 

Surrender and Payment

  A-4
   

3.4

 

No Fractional Shares

  A-6
   

3.5

 

Target Dissenting Shares

  A-6
   

3.6

 

Closing

  A-6

ARTICLE IV REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF TARGET

 
A-7
   

4.1

 

Organization and Qualification

  A-7
   

4.2

 

Capitalization

  A-8
   

4.3

 

Authority

  A-9
   

4.4

 

Consents and Approvals; No Violation

  A-9
   

4.5

 

Target SEC Reports

  A-10
   

4.6

 

Financial Statements

  A-11
   

4.7

 

Absence of Undisclosed Liabilities; Liabilities as of Year End

  A-11
   

4.8

 

Absence of Certain Changes

  A-11
   

4.9

 

Taxes

  A-12
   

4.10

 

Litigation

  A-13
   

4.11

 

Employee Benefit Plans; ERISA

  A-13
   

4.12

 

Environmental Liability

  A-18
   

4.13

 

Compliance with Applicable Laws

  A-19
   

4.14

 

Insurance

  A-19
   

4.15

 

Labor Matters; Employees

  A-20
   

4.16

 

Reserve Reports

  A-21
   

4.17

 

Permits

  A-22
   

4.18

 

Material Contracts

  A-22
   

4.19

 

Required Stockholder Vote

  A-23
   

4.20

 

Proxy/Prospectus; Registration Statement

  A-23
   

4.21

 

Intellectual Property

  A-23
   

4.22

 

Hedging

  A-23
   

4.23

 

Brokers

  A-24
   

4.24

 

Tax-Free Reorganization

  A-24
   

4.25

 

Fairness Opinion

  A-24
   

4.26

 

Takeover Laws

  A-24

ARTICLE V REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND MERGER SUB

 
A-24
   

5.1

 

Organization and Qualification

  A-24
   

5.2

 

Capitalization

  A-26
   

5.3

 

Authority

  A-27

A-ii


Table of Contents

   

5.4

 

Consents and Approvals; No Violation

  A-27
   

5.5

 

Parent AIM Reports

  A-28
   

5.6

 

Parent Financial Statements

  A-28
   

5.7

 

Absence of Undisclosed Liabilities

  A-28
   

5.8

 

Absence of Certain Changes

  A-29
   

5.9

 

Taxes

  A-29
   

5.10

 

Litigation

  A-30
   

5.11

 

Employee Benefit Plans; ERISA

  A-30
   

5.12

 

Environmental Liability

  A-35
   

5.13

 

Compliance with Applicable Laws

  A-35
   

5.14

 

Insurance

  A-36
   

5.15

 

Labor Matters; Employees

  A-36
   

5.16

 

Reserve Reports

  A-37
   

5.17

 

Permits

  A-38
   

5.18

 

Material Contracts

  A-38
   

5.19

 

Required Stockholder Vote

  A-38
   

5.20

 

Proxy/Prospectus; Registration Statement

  A-39
   

5.21

 

Intellectual Property

  A-39
   

5.22

 

Hedging

  A-39
   

5.23

 

Brokers

  A-39
   

5.24

 

Tax Matters

  A-39
   

5.25

 

Takeover Laws

  A-39

ARTICLE VI CONDUCT OF BUSINESS PENDING THE MERGER

 
A-40
   

6.1

 

Conduct of Business by Target Pending the Merger

  A-40
   

6.2

 

Conduct of Business by Parent Pending the Merger

  A-42

ARTICLE VII ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS

 
A-44
   

7.1

 

Access and Information

  A-44
   

7.2

 

Target Acquisition Proposals

  A-45
   

7.3

 

Parent Acquisition Proposals

  A-48
   

7.4

 

Directors' and Officers' Indemnification and Insurance

  A-51
   

7.5

 

Further Assurances

  A-53
   

7.6

 

Expenses

  A-53
   

7.7

 

Cooperation

  A-53
   

7.8

 

Publicity

  A-53
   

7.9

 

Additional Actions

  A-54
   

7.10

 

Filings

  A-54
   

7.11

 

Consents

  A-54
   

7.12

 

Certain Parent Board Approvals

  A-54
   

7.13

 

Parent Board of Directors

  A-54
   

7.14

 

Stockholders' Meetings

  A-55
   

7.15

 

Preparation of the Proxy/Prospectus and Registration Statement

  A-55
   

7.16

 

Stock Exchange Listing

  A-56
   

7.17

 

Employee Matters

  A-56
   

7.18

 

Notice of Certain Events

  A-58
   

7.19

 

Site Inspections

  A-58
   

7.20

 

Affiliate Agreements; Tax Treatment

  A-59
   

7.21

 

Stockholder Litigation

  A-59
   

7.22

 

Parent Restructure

  A-59

A-iii


Table of Contents

ARTICLE VIII CONDITIONS TO CONSUMMATION OF THE MERGER

  A-59
   

8.1

 

Conditions to the Obligation of Each Party

  A-59
   

8.2

 

Conditions to the Obligations of Parent

  A-60
   

8.3

 

Conditions to the Obligations of Target

  A-61

ARTICLE IX SURVIVAL

 
A-61
   

9.1

 

Survival of Representations and Warranties

  A-61
   

9.2

 

Survival of Covenants and Agreements

  A-61

ARTICLE X TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER

 
A-62
   

10.1

 

Termination

  A-62
   

10.2

 

Effect of Termination

  A-64
   

10.3

 

Termination Fees

  A-64

ARTICLE XI MISCELLANEOUS

 
A-66
   

11.1

 

Notices

  A-66
   

11.2

 

Severability

  A-67
   

11.3

 

Assignment

  A-67
   

11.4

 

Interpretation

  A-67
   

11.5

 

Counterparts

  A-67
   

11.6

 

Entire Agreement

  A-67
   

11.7

 

Governing Law

  A-68
   

11.8

 

Submission to Jurisdiction

  A-68
   

11.9

 

Attorneys' Fees

  A-68
   

11.10

 

No Third Party Beneficiaries

  A-68
   

11.11

 

Disclosure Schedules

  A-68
   

11.12

 

Amendments and Supplements

  A-68
   

11.13

 

Extensions, Waivers, Etc. 

  A-68
   

11.14

 

Specific Performance

  A-68

A-iv


Table of Contents


INDEX OF DEFINED TERMS

Term
  Section

Administaff Agreement

  4.11(a)

Administaff Plans

  4.11(b)

Affiliated Group

  4.24

Agreement

  Preamble

AIM

  3.4

AIM Rules

  5.5(b)

Ancillary Agreements

  4.3

Assessment

  7.19

Audit

  4.9(f)

Average Closing Price

  3.4

Book-Entry Shares

  3.3(a)

Business Day

  3.3(b)

Business Employees

  7.17(b)

Closing

  3.6

Closing Date

  3.6

COBRA

  4.11(g)

Code

  Preamble

Common Conversion Consideration

  3.1(b)

Confidentiality Agreement

  7.1

Corporate Records

  4.1(b)

Customary Post-Closing Consents

  4.4(b)

D&O Insurance

  7.4(a)(ii)

DGCL

  1.1

Director Nominees

  7.13(a)

Effective Time

  1.2

Enforceability Exception

  4.3

Environmental Laws

  4.12(a)

ERISA

  4.11(b)

Exchange Act

  4.4(b)

Exchange Agent

  3.3(a)

Exchange Fund

  3.3(a)

Exchange Ratio

  3.1(b)

Expenses

  7.6(b)

Foreign Plan

  4.11(k)

GAAP

  4.6

Governmental Authority

  3.3(c)

Hazardous Substances

  4.12(b)

Hein

  7.15(b)

HSR Act

  4.4(b)

Hydrocarbons

  4.16(a)

Inspected Party

  7.19

Inspecting Party

  7.19

Intellectual Property

  4.21

Knowledge of Parent

  5.2(c)

Knowledge of Target

  4.2(c)

Liens

  4.2(b)

Merger

  Preamble

Merger Consideration

  3.1(b)

Merger Sub

  Preamble

Nomad

  5.2(c)

Oil and Gas Interests

  4.16(a)

Parent

  Preamble

Parent Acquisition Agreement

  7.3(c)(iii)

Parent Acquisition Proposal

  7.3(b)(i)

Parent Acquisition Proposal Recommendation

  7.3(c)(ii)

Parent Adverse Recommendation Change

  7.3(c)(i)

Parent AIM Reports

  5.11(a)

Parent Benefit Plans

  5.11(a)

Parent Breach

  10.1(c)

Parent Common Shares

  3.1(b)

Parent Disclosure Schedule

  5.1(a)

Parent Employees

  5.11(a)

Parent Engagement Letters

  5.23

Parent ERISA Affiliate

  5.11(a)

Parent Indemnified Liabilities

  7.4(b)(i)

Parent Indemnified Party

  7.4(b)(i)

Parent Material Adverse Effect

  5.1(f)

Parent Material Contracts

  5.18(a)

Parent Meeting

  7.14(b)

Parent Options

  5.11(a)

Parent Parties

  Preamble

Parent Preferred Shares

  5.11(a)

Parent Reserve Report

  5.16(a)

Parent Revised Offer

  7.2(e)(ii)

Parent Restricted Shares

  3.2(d)

Parent Series A Shares

  5.2(a)

Parent Stockholders' Approval

  5.19

Parent Superior Proposal

  7.3(b)(ii)

Parent Takeover

  10.3(b)(i)

Parent Termination Fee

  10.3(a)(iii)

Parties

  Preamble

Party

  Preamble

PBGC

  4.11(e)(v)

PBCs

  4.12(e)

Permits

  4.17

Person

  3.3(c)

Post-Closing Plans

  7.17(c)

Pre-Closing Plans

  7.17(d)

Preferred Conversion Consideration

  3.1(d)

Proceeding

  7.4(a)(i)

Proxy/Prospectus

  4.20

Readmission Document

  7.15(a)

A-v


Table of Contents

Term
  Section

Registration Statement

  4.20

Sarbanes-Oxley Act

  4.5(b)

SEC

  4.5(a)

Securities Act

  4.4(b)

Series D Certificate

  4.19

Series D CD Amendment

  4.19

Series D Stock

  3.1(d)

Stock Certificates

  3.3(a)

Subsidiary

  4.1(f)

Surviving Corporation

  1.1

Target

  Preamble

Target Acquisition Agreement

  7.2(c)(iii)

Target Acquisition Proposal

  7.2(b)(i)

Target Acquisition Proposal Recommendation

  7.2(c)(ii)

Target Adverse Recommendation Change

  7.2(c)(i)

Target Benefit Plans

  4.11(b)

Target Breach

  10.1(d)

Target Common Shares

  3.1(a)

Target Disclosure Schedule

  4.1(a)

Target Dissenting Shareholders

  3.5

Target Dissenting Shares

  3.5

Target Employees

  7.17(a)

Target Engagement Letters

  4.23

Target ERISA Affiliate

  4.11(b)

Target Financial Statements

  4.6

Target Indemnified Liabilities

  7.4(a)(i)

Target Indemnified Party

  7.4(a)(i)

Target Material Adverse Effect

  4.1(f)

Target Material Contracts

  4.18(a)

Target Meeting

  7.14(a)

Target Option

  3.2(a)

Target Permits

  4.12(d)

Target Preferred Shares

  4.2(a)

Target Reserve Report

  4.16(a)

Target Restricted Shares

  3.2(b)

Target Revised Offer

  7.3(e)(ii)

Target SEC Reports

  4.5(a)

Target Shares

  4.2(a)

Target Stockholders' Approval

  4.19

Target Stock Plans

  3.2(a)

Target Superior Proposal

  7.2(b)(ii)

Target Takeover

  10.3(a)(ii)

Target Termination Fee

  10.3(a)(i)

Tax Authority

  4.9(f)

Tax Returns

  4.9(f)

Taxes

  4.9(f)

TBOC

  7.4(b)(i)

Termination Date

  10.1(b)

Transactions

  3.6

UHY

  7.15(c)

WARN Act

  4.15(b)


EXHIBITS

Certificate of Incorporation of Surviving Corporation

  Exhibit 2.1

Bylaws of Surviving Corporation

 

Exhibit 2.2

Directors and Officers of Surviving Corporation

 

Exhibit 2.3

Form of Orderly Marketing Deed

 

Exhibit 3.2(b)

Certificate of Designations of Parent Series A Shares

 

Exhibit 5.2

Form of Target Tax Certificate

 

Exhibit 8.2(c)

Form of Separation Agreement

 

Exhibit 8.2(h)(i)

Form of Parent Tax Certificate

 

Exhibit 8.3(c)

A-vi


Table of Contents

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER

        This Agreement and Plan of Merger (this "Agreement"), dated September 29, 2009, by and among Resaca Exploitation, Inc., a Texas corporation ("Parent"), Resaca Acquisition Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent ("Merger Sub," and, together with Parent, the "Parent Parties"), and Cano Petroleum, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Target"). Parent, Merger Sub and Target are each a "party" and together are "parties" to this Agreement.

        WHEREAS, the respective Boards of Directors of Parent, Merger Sub and Target deem it advisable and in the best interests of their respective corporations and stockholders that Merger Sub merge with and into Target (the "Merger"), upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein; and

        WHEREAS, for federal income tax purposes, it is intended that the Merger will qualify as a reorganization under the provisions of Section 368(a) of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code");

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the representations, warranties and agreements contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


ARTICLE I

THE MERGER

        1.1    The Merger.     Upon the terms and subject to the conditions hereof, at the Effective Time, Merger Sub shall merge with and into Target, and the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub shall thereupon cease and Target shall be the surviving corporation in the Merger (sometimes referred to herein as the "Surviving Corporation"). The Merger shall have the effects set forth in Section 259 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "DGCL"), including the Surviving Corporation's succession to and assumption of all rights and obligations of Merger Sub.


        1.2
    Effective Time of the Merger.     The Merger shall become effective (the "Effective Time") upon the later of (i) the date of filing of a properly executed Certificate of Merger relating to the Merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware in accordance with the DGCL, and (ii) at such later time as the parties shall agree and set forth in such Certificate of Merger. The filing of the Certificate of Merger referred to above shall be made as soon as practicable on the Closing Date set forth in Section 3.6.


        1.3
    Tax Treatment.     It is intended that the Merger shall constitute a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code.


ARTICLE II

THE SURVIVING CORPORATION

        2.1    Certificate of Incorporation.     The Certificate of Incorporation of Target in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be amended to read in its entirety as set forth in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 2.1, which shall be annexed to the Certificate of Merger at the time of filing of the Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, until thereafter amended in accordance with the terms thereof and the DGCL.


        2.2
    Bylaws.     The Bylaws of Target as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be amended to read in their entirety as set forth in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 2.2, until thereafter amended in accordance with their terms and as provided by the Surviving Corporation's Certificate of Incorporation and such Bylaws and the DGCL.

A-1


Table of Contents


        2.3
    Directors and Officers.     At and after the Effective Time, the individuals listed on Exhibit 2.3 shall be the directors and officers of the Surviving Corporation until their respective successors have been duly elected or appointed and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal in accordance with the Surviving Corporation's Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws and the DGCL. This Section 2.3 shall not alter Parent's obligations under Section 7.13.


ARTICLE III

CONVERSION OF SHARES

        3.1    Conversion of Capital Stock.     At the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the holders of any capital stock described below:

        (a)   All shares of Common Stock of Target, par value $0.0001 per share ("Target Common Shares"), that are held by Target as treasury shares shall be canceled and cease to be outstanding and no cash, Parent capital stock or other consideration shall be delivered in exchange therefor.

        (b)   Subject to Sections 3.2(b) and 3.3(f), each issued and outstanding Target Common Share (other than Target Common Shares treated in accordance with Section 3.1(a)) shall be converted into the right to receive 2.100 (the "Exchange Ratio") validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Parent (the "Parent Common Shares") (the" Common Conversion Consideration"). All such Target Common Shares, when so converted, shall be retired, shall cease to be outstanding and shall automatically be cancelled, and each holder of any such Target Common Share shall cease to have any rights with respect thereto, except the right to receive, without interest, upon the surrender of such Target Common Shares in accordance with Section 3.3: (x) certificates representing whole Parent Common Shares or whole Parent Common Shares represented by book-entry in accordance with Section 3.3(a), (y) any unpaid dividends and other distributions under Section 3.3(f), and (z) cash in lieu of fractional Parent Common Shares under Section 3.4. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if between the date hereof and the Effective Time, the Parent Common Shares or Target Common Shares are changed into a different number of shares or a different class, because of any stock dividend, subdivision, reclassification, recapitalization, split, combination or exchange of shares, the Exchange Ratio above shall be correspondingly adjusted to reflect such stock dividend, subdivision, reclassification, recapitalization, split, combination or exchange of shares.

        (c)   The Merger shall not affect any Parent Common Shares issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time.

        (d)   Subject to Section 3.3(f), each issued and outstanding share of Target's Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, no par value per share (the "Series D Stock"), shall be converted into the right to receive one (1) validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable Parent Series A Share (the "Preferred Conversion Consideration", and collectively with the Common Conversion Consideration, the "Merger Consideration"). All such shares of Series D Stock, when so converted, shall be retired, shall cease to be outstanding and shall automatically be cancelled, and each holder of any such shares of Series D Stock shall cease to have any rights with respect thereto, except the right to receive, without interest, upon the surrender of such shares of Series D Stock in accordance with Section 3.3: (x) certificates representing whole Parent Series A Shares or whole Parent Series A Shares represented by book-entry in accordance with Section 3.3(a) and (y) any unpaid dividends and other distributions under Section 3.3(f). Notwithstanding the foregoing, if between the date hereof and the Effective Time, the shares of the Series D Stock are changed into a different number of shares or a different class, because of any stock dividend (other than a payment-in-kind distribution in accordance with the Series D Certificate), subdivision, reclassification, recapitalization, split, combination or exchange of shares, the exchange ratio related to the Preferred Conversion Consideration above shall be correspondingly

A-2


Table of Contents


adjusted to reflect such stock dividend, subdivision, reclassification, recapitalization, split, combination or exchange of shares.

        (e)   All Parent Common Shares issued upon the surrender of Target Common Shares in accordance with the terms hereof shall be deemed to have been issued in full satisfaction of all rights pertaining to such Target Common Shares, and from and after the Effective Time there shall be no further registration of transfers effected on the stock transfer books of the Surviving Corporation of Target Common Shares which were outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time. If, after the Effective Time, Target Common Shares are presented to the Surviving Corporation for any reason, they shall be canceled and exchanged as provided in this Article III.

        (f)    All Parent Series A Shares issued upon the surrender of shares of Series D Stock in accordance with the terms hereof shall be deemed to have been issued in full satisfaction of all rights pertaining to such shares of Series D Stock, and from and after the Effective Time there shall be no further registration of transfers effected on the stock transfer books of the Surviving Corporation of shares of Series D Stock which were outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time. If, after the Effective Time, shares of Series D Stock are presented to the Surviving Corporation for any reason, they shall be canceled and exchanged as provided in this Article III.


        3.2
    Stock Options; Restricted Stock.     

        (a)   Each option to purchase Target Common Shares (each, a "Target Option") granted under the employee and director stock plans and agreements of Target (the "Target Stock Plans"), whether vested or unvested, that is outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall, as of the Effective Time and in accordance with its terms, automatically and without any action on the part of the holders thereof, be converted into a vested Parent Option, on the same terms and conditions (except as provided in this Section 3.2) as were applicable under such Target Option immediately prior to the Effective Time, to purchase that number of Parent Common Shares equal to the product of (i) the total number of Target Common Shares subject to such Target Option and (ii) the Exchange Ratio, rounded down to the nearest whole number of Parent Common Shares; provided that, in the event of rounding down of any fractional Parent Common Shares, Parent shall pay an amount in cash (without interest) in accordance with Section 3.2(a). The per-share exercise price for the Parent Common Shares issuable upon exercise of such Parent Options will be equal to the quotient determined by dividing (A) the exercise price per share of the Target Common Shares at which the Target Options were exercisable immediately prior to the Effective Time by (B) the Exchange Ratio, and rounding to the resulting per-share exercise price up to the nearest whole cent. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (x) in no event shall the per-share exercise price be less than the par value of Parent Common Shares, and (y) in any event the exercise price, the number of Parent Common Shares purchasable pursuant to such Target Option and the terms and conditions of exercise of such Target Option shall be determined in accordance with the requirements of Section 424(a) of the Code and in a manner that does not cause any Target Option to be deferred compensation subject to Section 409A of the Code. Prior to Closing, (1) Parent will take all corporate actions necessary to reserve for issuance a sufficient number of Parent Common Shares for delivery upon exercise of Target Options assumed by Parent under this Section 3.2(a) and (2) Target shall pass such resolutions as necessary to approve the terms of this Section 3.2(a).

        (b)   Each award of restricted Target Common Shares granted under a Target Stock Plan that is outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (the "Target Restricted Shares") shall, as of the Effective Time and in accordance with its terms, automatically and without any action on the part of the holders thereof, vest and be converted, on the same terms and conditions (except as provided in this Section 3.2(b)) as were applicable under such Target Restricted Shares immediately prior to the Effective Time, into a number of Parent Common Shares equal to the product of (i) the total number of Target Common Shares subject to such grant of Target Restricted Shares and (ii) the Exchange

A-3


Table of Contents


Ratio; provided that, in lieu of any fractional Parent Common Shares, Parent shall pay an amount in cash (without interest) in accordance with Section 3.4. Prior to the Closing Date, Target shall take all action necessary to ensure that each holder of Target Restricted Shares that will be converted into the right to receive Parent Common Shares executes an Orderly Marketing Deed, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 3.2(b).

        (c)   As soon as practicable after the Effective Time, Parent will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement on Form S-8 (or any successor or other appropriate forms) with respect to the Parent Common Shares subject to stock options and the restricted Parent Common Shares and will use its reasonable efforts to maintain the effectiveness of such registration statement (and maintain the current status of the prospectus or prospectuses contained therein) for as long as such options remain outstanding.

        (d)   Prior to the Closing Date, Parent's Board of Directors shall take all action necessary to declare that the Transactions shall not constitute a "change in control" with respect to (i) the options to purchase Parent Common Shares (the "Parent Options") and (ii) the outstanding awards of restricted stock issued by Parent pursuant to Parent's stock incentive or other equity award plans (the "Parent Restricted Shares"). In connection with the Transactions, Parent's Board of Directors shall not exercise any suspension or other remedial measures that may be available to it under Section 8 of the Bylaws of Parent.


        3.3
    Surrender and Payment.     

        (a)   Prior to the Effective Time, Parent shall authorize one (1) or more transfer agent(s) reasonably acceptable to Target to act as Exchange Agent hereunder (the "Exchange Agent") with respect to the Merger. At or prior to the Effective Time, Parent shall deposit with the Exchange Agent in trust for the benefit of the holders of Target Shares, for exchange in accordance with this Section 3.3 through the Exchange Agent, (i) certificates representing the Parent Common Shares and Parent Series A Shares issuable pursuant to Section 3.1 in exchange for outstanding Target Common Shares and shares of Series D Stock, respectively; (ii) cash, Parent Common Shares and Parent Series A Shares sufficient to pay any unpaid dividends and other distributions due under Section 3.3(f); and (iii) cash funds sufficient to pay cash in lieu of fractional Parent Common Shares in accordance with Section 3.4 (such Parent Common Shares, Parent Series A Shares, together with any dividends or distributions with respect thereto and such cash in lieu of fractional Parent Common Shares, being hereinafter referred to as the "Exchange Fund"). The Exchange Agent shall, pursuant to irrevocable instructions, deliver the appropriate Merger Consideration in exchange for surrendered certificates that immediately prior to the Effective Time represented Target Common Shares and shares of Series D Stock (the "Stock Certificates") or Target Common Shares and shares of Series D Stock represented by book-entry ("Book-Entry Shares") pursuant to Section 3.1 out of the Exchange Fund. Except as contemplated by Section 3.3(d), the Exchange Fund shall not be used for any other purpose.

        (b)   Promptly but in any event within five (5) Business Days after the Effective Time, Parent shall cause the Exchange Agent to send to each holder of record of Stock Certificates or Book-Entry Shares a letter of transmittal for use in such exchange (which shall specify that the delivery shall be effected, and risk of loss and title with respect to the Stock Certificates shall pass, only upon proper delivery of the Stock Certificates to the Exchange Agent or, in the case of Book-Entry Shares, upon adherence to the procedures set forth therein, and which shall be in a form reasonably acceptable to Target), and instructions for use in effecting the surrender of Stock Certificates or, in the case of Book-Entry Shares, the surrender of such shares, for payment therefor in accordance herewith. The Exchange Agent shall also provide for holders of Stock Certificates to procure in person immediately after the Effective Time a letter of transmittal and instructions and to deliver in person immediately after the Effective Time such letter of transmittal and Stock Certificates in exchange for the applicable Merger Consideration. No interest shall accrue or be paid on the Merger Consideration payable upon the

A-4


Table of Contents


surrender of any Stock Certificate or Book-Entry Shares for the benefit of the holder of such Stock Certificate or Book-Entry Shares. "Business Day" means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday under the laws of the United States or the State of Texas.

        (c)   If any portion of the Merger Consideration is to be issued or paid to a Person other than the registered holder of Target Common Shares or shares of Series D Stock represented by the Stock Certificate(s) surrendered in exchange therefor, no such issuance or payment shall be made unless (i) the Stock Certificate(s) so surrendered have been properly endorsed or otherwise be in proper form for transfer and (ii) the Person requesting such issuance has paid to the Exchange Agent any transfer or other taxes required as a result of such issuance to a Person other than the registered holder or establish to the Exchange Agent's satisfaction that such tax has been paid or is not applicable. For purposes of this Agreement, "Person" means an individual, a corporation, a limited liability company, a partnership, an association, a trust or any other entity or organization, including any governmental or regulatory authority or agency (a "Governmental Authority").

        (d)   Any portion of the Exchange Fund that remains unclaimed by the holders of Target Common Shares and Series D Stock one (1) year after the Effective Time shall be returned to Parent and any such holder who has not exchanged such holder's Stock Certificates or Book-Entry Shares in accordance with this Section 3.3 prior to that time shall thereafter look only to Parent (subject to abandoned property, escheat and other similar laws), as a general creditor thereof, to exchange such Stock Certificates or Book-Entry Shares or to pay amounts to which such holder is entitled pursuant to Section 3.1. Notwithstanding the foregoing, none of Parent, Target or the Surviving Corporation shall be liable to any holder of Stock Certificates or Book-Entry Shares for any amount paid, or Merger Consideration delivered, to a public official pursuant to applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar laws.

        (e)   If any Stock Certificate is lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by the Person claiming such Stock Certificate is lost, stolen or destroyed and, if required by the Surviving Corporation, the posting by such Person of a bond in such reasonable amount as Parent may direct as indemnity against any claim that may be made against it with respect to such Stock Certificate, the Exchange Agent will issue in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed Stock Certificate the Merger Consideration in respect thereof pursuant to this Agreement.

        (f)    No dividends or other distributions declared or made after the Effective Time with respect to Parent Common Shares or Parent Series A Shares with a record date after the Effective Time shall be paid to the holder of any unsurrendered Stock Certificate or Book-Entry Shares with respect to the Parent Common Shares or Parent Series A Shares that such holder has the right to receive and no cash payment in lieu of fractional shares shall be paid to a holder pursuant to Section 3.4 until the holder of record of such Stock Certificate or Book-Entry Shares has surrendered such Stock Certificate or Book-Entry Shares in accordance with Section 3.3. Subject to the effect of applicable laws (including escheat and abandoned property laws), following surrender of any such Stock Certificate or Book-Entry Shares, the record holder of the certificate or certificates representing the Parent Common Shares or Parent Series A Shares issued in exchange therefor shall be paid, without interest, (i) the amount of dividends or other distributions with a record date after the Effective Time theretofore payable with respect to Parent Common Shares or Parent Series A Shares; and (ii) if the payment date for any dividend or distribution with a record date after the Effective Time with respect to Parent Common Shares or Parent Series A Shares has not occurred prior to the surrender of such Stock Certificate or Book-Entry Shares, at the appropriate payment date therefor, the amount of dividends or other distributions with respect to Parent Common Shares or Parent Series A Shares with a record date after the Effective Time but prior to the surrender of such Stock Certificate or Book-Entry Shares and a payment date subsequent to the surrender of such Stock Certificate or Book-Entry Shares.

A-5


Table of Contents


        3.4
    No Fractional Shares.     No fractional Parent Common Shares shall be issued in the Merger and fractional share interests shall not entitle the owner thereof to vote or to any rights of a stockholder of Parent. In lieu of any fractional interest, each holder of Target Common Shares immediately prior to the Effective Time who would otherwise have been entitled to a fraction of a Parent Common Share upon surrender of Stock Certificates or Book-Entry Shares for exchange pursuant to Section 3.3 shall be paid an amount in cash (without interest) equal to the product obtained by multiplying (A) the fractional share interest to which such former holder (after taking into account all Target Common Shares held at the Effective Time by such holder) would otherwise be entitled by (B) the Average Closing Price. The "Average Closing Price" shall mean the average (rounded to the nearest second decimal place) of the daily closing prices for the Parent Common Shares for the fifteen (15) consecutive full trading days on which such shares are actually traded on the AIM Market of the London Stock Exchange (the "AIM") (as reported in The Wall Street Journal or, if not reported thereby, any other authoritative source selected by Parent) ending at the close of trading on the trading day prior to the Closing Date.


        3.5
    Target Dissenting Shares.     Target Dissenting Shares shall not be converted into or represent the right to receive any Merger Consideration, but instead shall represent only the right to receive the amount determined pursuant to the provisions of Section 262 of the DGCL. At the Effective Time, any Target Dissenting Stockholder shall not thereafter be entitled to vote or exercise any other rights of a stockholder except the right to receive payment for such Target Dissenting Stockholder's Target Dissenting Shares in accordance with Section 262 of the DGCL. If a Target Dissenting Stockholder has so failed to perfect or lost his right to receive, or has effectively withdrawn his demand for, the amount determined under Section 262 of the DGCL, the Target Common Shares and/or shares of Series D Stock held by such holder shall cease to be Target Dissenting Shares and shall entitle such holder to receive the Merger Consideration in respect of such shares as provided in Section 3.1(b), and promptly following the occurrence of such event and upon the surrender of the Stock Certificate(s) representing such shares or as proper for Book Entry Shares, the Exchange Agent and the Surviving Corporation (as applicable) shall deliver to such holder the Merger Consideration in respect of such shares. Target shall comply with those provisions of Section 262 of the DGCL which are required to be performed by Target prior to the Effective Time to the reasonable satisfaction of Parent. Target shall give Parent (i) prompt notice of any written demands to exercise dissenter's rights and (ii) an opportunity to participate at its own expense in all negotiations and proceedings with respect to demands for fair value under the DGCL. Target shall not, except with the prior written consent of Parent (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed), voluntarily make any payment with respect to demands for fair value under the DGCL or offer to settle or settle any such claims. For purposes of this Agreement, (i) "Target Dissenting Shares" means any Target Common Shares and shares of Series D Stock held by a Target Dissenting Stockholder as of the Effective Time and (ii) "Target Dissenting Stockholders" means any holder of Target Common Shares and/or shares of Series D Stock who does not vote in favor of the Merger (or consent thereto in writing) and who is entitled to demand and properly demands a judicial appraisal of the fair value of such stockholder's shares pursuant to, and otherwise complies in all respects with, the provisions of Section 262 of the DGCL.


        3.6
    Closing.     The closing (the "Closing") of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (the "Transactions") shall take place at 12:00 noon, local time, on the second Business Day following the date on which all of the conditions set forth in Article VIII are satisfied or waived, at the offices of Haynes and Boone, LLP, located at One Houston Center, 1221 McKinney Street, Suite 2100, Houston, Texas 77010, or at such other date and time as Parent and Target shall agree (the "Closing Date").

A-6


Table of Contents


ARTICLE IV

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF TARGET

        Target represents and warrants to the Parent Parties as follows:


        4.1
    Organization and Qualification.     

        (a)   Target is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of Delaware, is duly qualified to do business as a foreign corporation and is in good standing in the jurisdictions set forth in Section 4.1(a) of the disclosure schedule delivered by Target to Parent contemporaneously with the execution hereof (the "Target Disclosure Schedule"), which include each jurisdiction in which the character of Target's properties or the nature of its business makes such qualification necessary, except in jurisdictions, if any, where the failure to be so qualified would not result in a Target Material Adverse Effect (as defined below). Target has all requisite corporate power and authority to own, use or lease its properties and to carry on its business as it is now being conducted. Target has made available to Parent a complete and correct copy of its Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, each as amended to date, and Target's Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws as made available are in full force and effect. Target is not in default in any respect in the performance, observation or fulfillment of any provision of its Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws.

        (b)   The minute books of Target contain true, complete and accurate records of all meetings and consents in lieu of meetings of its Board of Directors (and any committees thereof) and stockholders ("Corporate Records"). Copies of such Corporate Records of Target have been heretofore made available to Parent or Parent's counsel.

        (c)   The stock, warrant and option ownership and transfer records of Target contain true, complete and accurate records of the securities ownership as of the date of such records and the transfers involving the capital stock and other securities of Target. Copies of such records of Target have been heretofore made available to Parent or Parent's counsel.

        (d)   Section 4.1(d) of the Target Disclosure Schedule lists the name and jurisdiction of organization of each Subsidiary of Target and the jurisdictions in which each such Subsidiary is qualified or holds licenses to do business as a foreign corporation or other organization as of the date hereof. Except for Target's Subsidiaries, Target does not own, directly or indirectly, any ownership, equity, profits or voting interest in any Person, other than equity interests held for investment that are not, in the aggregate, material to Target (other than joint operating and other ownership arrangements and tax partnerships entered into in the ordinary course of business that, individually or in the aggregate, are not material to the operations or business of Target and Target's Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, and that do not entail any material liabilities). Each of Target's Subsidiaries is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of its jurisdiction of incorporation, is duly qualified to do business as a foreign corporation and is in good standing in the jurisdictions listed in Section 4.1(d) of the Target Disclosure Schedule, which includes each jurisdiction in which the character of such Subsidiary's properties or the nature of its business makes such qualification necessary, except in jurisdictions, if any, where the failure to be so qualified would not result in a Target Material Adverse Effect. Each of Target's Subsidiaries has the requisite corporate power and authority to own, use or lease its properties and to carry on its business as it is now being conducted and as it is now proposed to be conducted. Target has made available to Parent a complete and correct copy of the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws (or similar organizational documents) of each of Target's Subsidiaries, each as amended to date, and the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws (or similar organizational documents) as made available are in full force and effect. No Subsidiary of Target is in default in any respect in the performance, observation or fulfillment of any provision of its certificate of incorporation or bylaws (or similar organizational documents). Other than Target's Subsidiaries, Target does not beneficially own or

A-7


Table of Contents


control, directly or indirectly, five percent (5%) or more of any class of equity or similar securities of any corporation or other organization, whether incorporated or unincorporated.

        (e)   Complete and correct copies of the corporate, partnership or limited liability company records of each of Target's Subsidiaries have been heretofore made available to Parent or Parent's counsel.

        (f)    For purposes of this Agreement, (i) a "Target Material Adverse Effect" means any event, circumstance, condition, development or occurrence causing, resulting in or having (or with the passage of time likely to cause, result in or have) a material adverse effect on the financial condition, business, assets, properties or results of operations of Target and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole; provided that, in no event shall any of the following alone or in combination be deemed, in and of itself, to constitute or be taken into account in determining a Target Material Adverse Effect: any event, circumstance, change or effect that results from (a) changes affecting the national or regional economy generally or the oil and gas industry generally (provided that Target is not disproportionately affected by such changes), (b) changes in the market price of oil or natural gas, (c) the public announcement or pending nature of the Transactions, (d) compliance with the terms of, or taking any action required by, this Agreement, (e) change in the price or trading volume of the Target Common Shares or the Parent Common Shares, (f) the outbreak or escalation of hostilities involving the United States, the declaration by the United States of a national emergency or war or the occurrence of any other calamity or crisis, including acts of terrorism or (g) any change in the accounting requirements or principles imposed on Target or its business by GAAP or any change in applicable law after the date hereof; and (ii) "Subsidiary" means, with respect to any party, any corporation or other organization, whether incorporated or unincorporated, of which (x) at least a majority of the securities or other interests having by their terms voting power to elect a majority of the Board of Directors or others performing similar functions with respect to such corporation or other organization is directly or indirectly beneficially owned or controlled by such party or by any one (1) or more of its subsidiaries, or by such party and one (1) or more of its subsidiaries, or (y) such party or any Subsidiary of such party is a general partner of a partnership or a manager of a limited liability company.


        4.2
    Capitalization.     

        (a)   The authorized capital stock of Target consists of 100,000,000 Target Common Shares, and 5,000,000 preferred shares (the "Target Preferred Shares" and together with the Target Common Shares, the "Target Shares") of which (i) 600 shares have been designated as Target Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, no par value per share; (b) 8,000 shares have been designated as Target Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, no par value per share; (c) 8,000 shares have been designated as Target Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, no par value per share; and (d) 49,116 have been designated as the Series D Stock. As of the date hereof, Target has (i) 47,273,224 Target Common Shares issued (of which 45,570,147 are outstanding and 1,703,077 are held by Target in treasury), (ii) 23,849 shares of the Series D Stock issued and outstanding (which number does not include 3,416 additional shares of Series D Stock to be issued as of September 28, 2009 in accordance with the terms of the Series D Certificate as a paid-in-kind distribution), (iii) 386,669 Target Restricted Shares issued and outstanding, and (iv) outstanding Target Options to acquire 1,395,463 Target Common Shares under stock option plans or agreements of Target (of which Target Options to purchase an aggregate of 1,020,372 shares of Target Common Shares are exercisable). There are no bonds, debentures, notes or other indebtedness issued or outstanding having the right to vote with Target's stockholders, whether together or as a separate class, on any matters on which Target's stockholders may vote. All the outstanding Target Common Shares are validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable, and free of preemptive rights. Except as set forth above or in Section 4.2(a) of the Target Disclosure Schedule, and other than this Agreement, there are no outstanding subscriptions, options, rights, warrants, convertible securities, stock appreciation rights, phantom equity, or other agreements or commitments (including "rights plans" or "poison pills") obligating Target to issue, transfer, sell, redeem, repurchase or otherwise acquire any shares of its capital stock of any class. There are no registration rights, and there is no

A-8


Table of Contents


voting trust, proxy, rights plan, antitakeover plan or other agreement, arrangement or other understanding to which Target is a party or by which Target is bound with respect to any equity security of any class of Target.

        (b)   Except as set forth in Section 4.2(b) of the Target Disclosure Schedule, Target is, directly or indirectly, the record and beneficial owner of all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of each Target Subsidiary, there are no irrevocable proxies with respect to any such shares, and no equity securities of any Target Subsidiary are or may become required to be issued because of any options, warrants, rights to subscribe to, calls or commitments of any character whatsoever relating to, or securities or rights convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for, shares of any capital stock of any Target Subsidiary, and there are no contracts, commitments, understandings or arrangements by which Target or any Target Subsidiary is or may be bound to issue additional shares of capital stock of any Target Subsidiary or securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any such shares. Except as set forth in Section 4.2(b) of the Target Disclosure Schedule, all of such shares Target owns are validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable and are owned by it free and clear of all liens, mortgages, pledges, security interests, encumbrances, claims or charges of any kind (collectively, "Liens").

        (c)   Target Common Shares are listed on the NYSE Amex under the symbol "CFW." No action or proceeding is pending or, to the knowledge of Target, threatened against Target by the NYSE Amex or any other Governmental Authority regulating issuers on NYSE Amex with respect to Target or Target Common Shares. For purposes of this Agreement, phrases such as "knowledge of Target" and similar terms mean the current knowledge, after due inquiry, of any Vice President (including the corporate officer with responsibility for human resources and employee benefits) or the President, Chief Executive Officer or Chairman of Target.


        4.3
    Authority.     Target has full corporate power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and any ancillary agreements (the "Ancillary Agreements") to which Target is or will be a party and, subject to obtaining the Target Stockholders' Approval, to consummate the Transactions. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements to which Target is or will be a party and the consummation of the Transactions have been duly and validly authorized by Target's Board of Directors, and no other corporate proceedings on the part of Target are necessary to authorize this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements to which Target is or will be a party or to consummate the Transactions, other than the Target Stockholders' Approval. This Agreement has been, and the Ancillary Agreements to which Target is or will be a party are, or upon execution will be, duly and validly executed and delivered by Target and, assuming the due authorization, execution and delivery hereof and thereof by the other parties hereto and thereto, constitutes, or upon execution will constitute, valid and binding obligations of Target enforceable against Target in accordance with their respective terms, except as such enforceability may be subject to the effects of bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and other laws relating to or affecting the rights of creditors and of general principles of equity (the "Enforceability Exception").


        4.4
    Consents and Approvals; No Violation.     The execution and delivery of this Agreement, the consummation of the Transactions and the performance by Target of its obligations hereunder will not:

        (a)   subject to receipt of the Target Stockholders' Approval, conflict with any provision of Target's Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws, as amended, or the Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws (or other similar organizational documents) of any of Target's Subsidiaries;

        (b)   subject to obtaining the Target Stockholders' Approval and the filing of the Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State of Delaware, require any consent, waiver, approval, order, authorization or permit of, or registration, filing with or notification to, (i) any Governmental Authority, except for applicable requirements of the Hart Scott Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the "HSR Act"), the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), the

A-9


Table of Contents


Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), state laws relating to takeovers, if applicable, state securities or blue sky laws, except for approvals that are ministerial in nature and are customarily obtained from Governmental Authorities after the Effective Time in connection with transactions of the same nature as are contemplated hereby ("Customary Post-Closing Consents") or (ii) except as set forth in Section 4.4(b) of the Target Disclosure Schedule, any third party other than a Governmental Authority, other than such non-Governmental Authority third party consents, waivers, approvals, orders, authorizations and permits that would not (i) result in a Target Material Adverse Effect, (ii) materially impair the ability of Target or any of its Subsidiaries, as the case may be, to perform its obligations under this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement or (iii) prevent the consummation of any of the Transactions;

        (c)   except as set forth in Section 4.4(c) of the Target Disclosure Schedule, result in any violation of or the breach of or constitute a default (with notice or lapse of time or both) under, or give rise to any right of termination, cancellation or acceleration or guaranteed payments or a loss of a material benefit under, any of the terms, conditions or provisions of any note, lease, mortgage, license, agreement or other instrument or obligation to which Target, or any of its Subsidiaries, is a party or by which Target or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective properties or assets may be bound, except for such violations, breaches, defaults, or rights of termination, cancellation or acceleration, or losses as to which requisite waivers or consents have been obtained or which, individually or in the aggregate, would not (A) result in a Target Material Adverse Effect, (B) materially impair the ability of Target or any of its Subsidiaries to perform their obligations under this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement or (C) prevent the consummation of any of the Transactions;

        (d)   except as set forth in Section 4.4(d) of the Target Disclosure Schedule, violate the provisions of any order, writ, injunction, judgment, decree, statute, rule or regulation applicable to Target or any of its Subsidiaries;

        (e)   except as set forth in Section 4.4(e) of the Target Disclosure Schedule, result in the creation of any Liens upon any shares of capital stock or material properties or assets of Target or any of its Subsidiaries under any agreement or instrument to which Target or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by which Target or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their properties or assets is bound; or

        (f)    except as set forth in Section 4.4(f) of the Target Disclosure Schedule, result in any holder of any securities of Target being entitled to appraisal, dissenters' or similar rights.


        4.5
    Target SEC Reports.     

        (a)   Target has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), and has heretofore made available to Parent, true and complete copies of, each form, registration statement, report, schedule, proxy, announcement or information statement and other document (including exhibits and amendments thereto), including its annual reports to stockholders incorporated by reference in certain of such reports, required to be filed by it with the SEC since January 1, 2004 under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act (collectively, the "Target SEC Reports"). As of the respective dates the Target SEC Reports were filed or, if any Target SEC Reports were amended, as of the date such amendment was filed, each Target SEC Report, including any financial statements or schedules included therein, (a) complied in all material respects with all applicable requirements of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, as the case may be, and the applicable rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and (b) did not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. No event since the date of the last Target SEC Report has occurred that would require Target to file a Current Report on Form 8-K other than the execution of this Agreement.

A-10


Table of Contents

        (b)   The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Target have made all certifications (without qualification or exceptions to the matters certified) required by, and would be able to make such certifications (without qualification or exception to the matters certified) as of the date hereof and as of the Closing Date as if required to be made as of such dates pursuant to, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Sarbanes-Oxley Act"), as amended, and any related rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC, and the statements contained in any such certifications are complete and correct; neither Target nor its officers has received notice from any Governmental Entity questioning or challenging the accuracy, completeness, form or manner of filing or submission of such certification. Except as set forth in Section 4.6 of the Target Disclosure Schedule, Target maintains "disclosure controls and procedures" (as defined in Rule 13a-14(c) under the Exchange Act); such disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that all material information concerning Target and its Subsidiaries is made known on a timely basis to the individuals responsible for preparing Target's SEC filings and other public disclosures, and Target is otherwise in substantial compliance with all applicable provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the applicable listing standards of the NYSE Amex.


        4.6
    Financial Statements.     Each of the audited consolidated financial statements and unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of Target (including any related notes and schedules) included (or incorporated by reference) in its Annual Reports on Form 10-K for each of the three (3) fiscal years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for its fiscal quarters ended September 30, 2008, December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009 (collectively, the "Target Financial Statements") have been prepared from, and are in accordance with, the books and records of Target and its consolidated Subsidiaries, comply in all material respects with applicable accounting requirements and with the published rules and regulations of the SEC with respect thereto, have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") applied on a consistent basis (except as may be indicated in the notes thereto and subject, in the case of quarterly financial statements, to normal and recurring year-end adjustments) and fairly present, in conformity with GAAP applied on a consistent basis (except as may be indicated in the notes thereto), the consolidated financial position of Target and its Subsidiaries as of the date thereof and the consolidated results of operations and cash flows (and changes in financial position, if any) of Target and its Subsidiaries for the periods presented therein (subject to normal year-end adjustments and the absence of financial footnotes in the case of any unaudited interim financial statements).


        4.7
    Absence of Undisclosed Liabilities; Liabilities as of Year End.     Except (a) as set forth in Section 4.7 of the Target Disclosure Schedule and (b) for liabilities and obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practice since June 30, 2009, neither Target nor any of its Subsidiaries has incurred any liabilities or obligations of any nature (contingent or otherwise) that would have a Target Material Adverse Effect or would be required by GAAP to be reflected on a consolidated balance sheet of Target and its Subsidiaries or the notes thereto which are not reflected.


        4.8
    Absence of Certain Changes.     Except as set forth in Section 4.8 of the Target Disclosure Schedule or as contemplated by this Agreement, since June 30, 2009 (a) Target and its Subsidiaries have conducted their respective businesses only in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practices, (b) there has not been any change or development, or combination of changes or developments that, individually or in the aggregate, would have a Target Material Adverse Effect, (c) there has not been any declaration, setting aside for payment of any dividend or other distribution with respect to any shares of capital stock of Target, or any repurchase, redemption or other acquisition by Target or any of its Subsidiaries of any outstanding shares of capital stock or other securities of, or other ownership interests in, Target or any of its Subsidiaries, (d) there has not been any amendment of any term of any outstanding security of Target or any of its Subsidiaries, and (e) there has not been any change in any method of accounting or accounting practice by Target or any of its Subsidiaries, except for any such change required because of a concurrent change in GAAP or to conform a Subsidiary's accounting policies and practices to those of Target.

A-11


Table of Contents


        4.9
    Taxes.     Except as otherwise disclosed in Section 4.9 of the Target Disclosure Schedule and for matters that would not have a Target Material Adverse Effect:

        (a)   Target and each of its Subsidiaries have timely filed (or have had timely filed on their behalf) or will file or cause to be timely filed, all material Tax Returns (as defined below) required by applicable law to be filed by any of them prior to or as of the Closing Date. As of the time of filing, the foregoing Tax Returns correctly reflected the material facts regarding the income, business, assets, operations, activities, status, or other matters of Target or any other information required to be shown thereon. In particular, the foregoing tax returns are not subject to penalties under Section 6662 of the Code, relating to accuracy related penalties (or any corresponding provision of the state, local or foregoing Tax law) or any predecessor provision of law. An extension of time within which to file a Tax Return has not been requested or granted.

        (b)   Target and each of its Subsidiaries have paid (or have had paid on their behalf), or where payment is not yet due, have established (or have had established on their behalf and for their sole benefit and recourse), or will establish or cause to be established on or before the Closing Date, an adequate accrual for the payment of all material Taxes (as defined below) due with respect to any period ending prior to or as of the Closing Date. Target and each of its Subsidiaries have withheld and paid all Taxes required to have been withheld and paid in connection with any amounts paid or owing to any employee, independent contractor, creditor, stockholder, or other third party.

        (c)   No Audit (as defined below) by a Tax Authority (as defined below) is pending or to the knowledge of Target, threatened, with respect to any Tax Returns filed by, or Taxes due from, Target or any Subsidiary. No issue has been raised by any Tax Authority in any Audit of Target or any of its Subsidiaries that if raised with respect to any other period not so audited could be expected to result in a material proposed deficiency for any period not so audited. No material deficiency or adjustment for any Taxes has been proposed, asserted, assessed or, to the knowledge of Target, threatened, against Target or any of its Subsidiaries. There are no liens for Taxes upon the assets of Target or any of its Subsidiaries, except liens for current Taxes not yet delinquent.

        (d)   Neither Target nor any of its Subsidiaries has given or been requested to give any waiver of statutes of limitations relating to the payment of Taxes or have executed powers of attorney with respect to Tax matters, which will be outstanding as of the Closing Date.

        (e)   Prior to the date hereof, Target and its Subsidiaries have disclosed and provided or made available to Parent true and complete copies of, all material Tax sharing, Tax indemnity, or similar agreements to which Target or any of its Subsidiaries is a party to, is bound by, or has any obligation or liability for Taxes.

        (f)    In this Agreement, (i) "Audit" means any audit, assessment of Taxes, other examination by any Tax Authority, proceeding or appeal of such proceeding relating to Taxes; (ii) "Taxes" means all Federal, state, local and foreign taxes, and other assessments of a similar nature (whether imposed directly or through withholding), including any interest, additions to tax, or penalties applicable thereto; (iii) "Tax Authority" means the Internal Revenue Service and any other domestic or foreign Governmental Authority responsible for the administration of any Taxes; and (iv) "Tax Returns" means all Federal, state, local and foreign tax returns, declarations, statements, reports, schedules, forms and information returns and any amended Tax Return relating to Taxes.

        (g)   Except for the group of which Target is currently a member, Target has never been a member of an affiliated group of corporations, within the meaning of Section 1504 of the Code.

        (h)   Target has not agreed to make nor is it required to make any adjustment under Section 481(a) of the Code by reason of change in accounting method or otherwise.

A-12


Table of Contents

        (i)    None of the Target or any of its Subsidiaries has a liability for Taxes of any Person (other than Target and its Subsidiaries) under Regulation Section 1.1502-6 (or any similar provision of state, local or foreign law), as a transferee or successor, by contract or otherwise.

        (j)    Neither Target nor any of its subsidiaries has distributed stock of another Person, or has had its stock distributed by another Person in a transaction that was purported or intended to be governed in whole or in part by Code Section 355 or 361.


        4.10
    Litigation.     Except as disclosed in Section 4.10 of the Target Disclosure Schedule, there is no suit, claim, action, proceeding or investigation pending or, to Target's knowledge, threatened against or directly affecting Target, any Subsidiaries of Target or any of the directors or officers of Target or any of its Subsidiaries in their capacity as such, nor is there any reasonable basis therefor that could reasonably be expected to have a Target Material Adverse Effect, if adversely determined. Except as disclosed in Section 4.10 of the Target Disclosure Schedule, neither Target nor any of its Subsidiaries, nor any officer, director or employee of Target or any of its Subsidiaries has been permanently or temporarily enjoined by any order, judgment or decree of any court or any other Governmental Authority from engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with the business, assets or properties of Target or such Subsidiary nor, to the knowledge of Target, is Target, any Subsidiary or any officer, director or employee of Target or any of its Subsidiaries under investigation by any Governmental Authority. Except as disclosed in Section 4.10 of the Target Disclosure Schedule, there is no order, judgment or decree of any court or other tribunal or other agency extant enjoining or requiring Target or any of its Subsidiaries to take any action of any kind with respect to its business, assets, properties, employees or former employees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no representation or warranty in this Section 4.10 is made with respect to Environmental Laws, which are covered exclusively by the provisions set forth in Section 4.12.


        4.11
    Employee Benefit Plans; ERISA.     

        (a)   Target has entered into a Client Service Agreement with Administaff Companies II, L.P. or its affiliate (the "Administaff Agreement") under which Administaff Companies II, L.P. (or its affiliate) and Target are co-employers of the individuals performing services for Target and its Subsidiaries. Pursuant to the Administaff Agreement, Administaff Companies II, L.P. or its affiliate is responsible for, among other things, paying salaries and wages, complying with reporting and payment of federal and state payroll taxes, and providing benefits to the individuals performing services for Target and its Subsidiaries. Target has complied in all material respects with its responsibilities under the Administaff Agreement.

        (b)   Section 4.11(b) of the Target Disclosure Schedule lists as of the date of this Agreement all "employee benefit plans," as defined in Section 3(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"), and all other material employee compensation and benefit plans, agreements, programs, policies or other arrangements, including, without limitation, any employment or service agreements (except for offer letters providing for at will employment that do not provide for severance, acceleration or post termination benefits and other at will arrangements that may be terminated without notice by and at no expense or liability to Target, any Target Subsidiary, or any Target ERISA Affiliate), severance, short-term and long-term disability, paid leave, vacation pay, consulting or other compensation agreements, deferred compensation, bonus, long-term incentive programs in the form of restricted stock grants, stock option grants or other equity or phantom equity, supplemental unemployment, medical insurance including medical, dental, vision, and prescription coverage, life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance, tuition aid reimbursement, relocation assistance, employee or former employee loans in excess of $10,000, expatriate benefits, retiree medical and life insurance (1) maintained or sponsored by Administaff Companies II, L.P. or an affiliate thereof for the benefit of one (1) or more employees (or their eligible dependents) of Target, any of its Subsidiaries or any Target ERISA Affiliate (the "Administaff Plans") or (2) maintained or

A-13


Table of Contents


sponsored by Target or any of its Subsidiaries or any Target ERISA Affiliate or to which Target or any of its Subsidiaries or any Target ERISA Affiliate contributes or is obligated to contribute, other than the Administaff Plans (the "Target Benefit Plans"). A "Target ERISA Affiliate" is any trade or business, whether or not incorporated, which together with Target would be deemed a "single employer" within the meaning of Section 414(b), (c) or (m) of the Code or Section 4001(b)(1) of ERISA.

        (c)   Target has not, since July 30, 2002, extended credit, arranged for the extension of credit, or renewed, modified or forgiven an extension of credit made prior to such date, in the form of a personal loan to or for any Person who was, at any time since such date, an officer or director of the Target.

        (d)   Prior to the date of this Agreement, Target has made available to Parent a true, correct and complete copy of each of the Target Benefit Plans (and all amendments thereto) and any related plan documents (including adoption agreements, vendor Contracts and administrative services agreements, trust documents, insurance policies or contracts including policies relating to fiduciary liability insurance, bonds required by ERISA, other authorizing documents, employee booklets, summary plan descriptions, registration statements and prospectuses, investment policy statements, and summaries of material modifications and any material employee communications relating thereto) and has, with respect to each Target Benefit Plan that is subject to ERISA reporting requirements, made available to Parent true, correct and complete copies of the Form 5500 reports filed for the last three (3) plan years (including all audits, financial statements, schedules and attachments thereto) and all notices that were given to Target or a Target Benefit Plan by the Internal Revenue Service, Department of Labor, or other Governmental Authority or entity concerning any Target Benefit Plan.

        Each of Target and each Target Subsidiary has made available to Parent a true, correct and complete list of the names of all current officers, directors, and consultants of Target and each Target Subsidiary showing each such Person's name, position, location, and rate of annual remuneration.

        Each of Target and each Target Subsidiary has made available to Parent true, correct and complete copies of each of the following:

A-14


Table of Contents

        (e)   With respect to each Target Benefit Plan and, and to the knowledge of Target, with respect to each Administaff Plan:

A-15


Table of Contents

With respect to the Target Benefit Plans and the Administaff Plans, neither Target nor any Target ERISA Affiliate has engaged in, and Target and each Target ERISA Affiliate do not have any knowledge of any Person that has engaged in, any "prohibited transaction" (within the meaning of Section 406 of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code) for which no exemption exists under Section 408 of ERISA or Section 4975(c) of the Code or Section 4975(d) of the Code.

        (f)    Neither Target nor any Target Subsidiary or Target ERISA Affiliate is a party to, or has ever made any contribution to or otherwise incurred any obligation under, any "multiemployer plan" as such term is defined in Section 3(37) of ERISA or any "multiple employer plan" as such term is defined in Section 413(c) of the Code. There has been no termination or partial termination of any Target Benefit Plan within the meaning of Section 411(d)(3) of the Code. Neither Target nor any Target ERISA Affiliate has ever established, maintained or contributed to, or had an obligation to maintain or contribute to, any "employee benefit plan" within the meaning of Section 3(3) of ERISA that is subject to Title IV of ERISA or Section 412 of the Code.

        No event has occurred with respect to Target or a Target ERISA Affiliate in connection with which Target or any Target Subsidiary could be subject to any liability, lien or encumbrance with respect to any Target Benefit Plan or, to the knowledge of Target, any Administaff Plan or any employee benefit plan described in Section 3(3) of ERISA maintained, sponsored or contributed to by a Target ERISA Affiliate under ERISA or the Code, except for regular contributions and benefit payments in the ordinary course of plan business.

        Except as provided in Section 4.11(f) of the Target Disclosure Schedule, neither Target nor any Target Subsidiary nor any Target ERISA Affiliate sponsors or maintains any self-funded employee benefit plan, including any plan to which a stop-loss policy applies.

        (g)   Except as set forth in Section 4.11(g) of the Target Disclosure Schedule, no present or former employees of Target or any Target Subsidiary are covered by any agreements or plans that provide or will provide severance pay, post-termination health or life insurance benefits (other than as required under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, as amended ("COBRA") or applicable state law) or any similar benefits.

        (h)   Except as set forth in Section 4.11(h) of the Target Disclosure Schedule, the consummation of the Transactions shall not cause any payments or benefits to any employee to be either subject to an excise tax under Sections 4999 of the Code or non-deductible to Target under Section 280G or 162(m) of the Code. Section 4.11(h) of the Target Disclosure Schedule lists each Person who Target reasonably believes is, with respect to Target, any Target Subsidiary and/or any Target ERISA Affiliate, a "disqualified individual" (within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder) determined as of the date hereof.

A-16


Table of Contents

        (i)    Except as disclosed in Section 4.11(i) of the Target Disclosure Schedule, none of the execution and delivery of this Agreement, the consummation of the Merger or any other transaction contemplated hereby or any termination of employment or service in connection therewith or subsequent thereto will:

        (j)    With respect to each Target Benefit Plan subject to ERISA as either an "employee pension benefit plan" within the meaning of Section 3(2) of ERISA or an "employee welfare benefit plan" within the meaning of Section 3(1) of ERISA, Target has prepared in good faith and timely filed all requisite governmental reports (which were true, correct and complete as of the date filed), including any required audit reports, and has properly and timely filed and distributed or posted all notices and reports to employees required to be filed, distributed or posted with respect to each such Target Benefit Plan and, with respect to each Administaff Plan subject to ERISA as either an "employee pension benefit plan" within the meaning of Section 3(2) of ERISA or an "employee welfare benefit plan" within the meaning of Section 3(1) of ERISA, to the knowledge of Target, there has been prepared in good faith and timely filed all requisite governmental reports (which were true, correct and complete as of the date filed), including any required audit reports, and there has been properly and timely filed and distributed or posted all notices and reports to employees required to be filed, distributed or posted with respect to each such Administaff Plan.

        (k)   Each compensation and benefit plan required to be maintained or contributed to by the law or applicable custom or rule of the relevant jurisdiction outside of the United States (each such plan, a "Foreign Plan") is listed in Section 4.11(k) of the Target Disclosure Schedule except for plans maintained by Governmental Authorities. As regards each Foreign Plan: (i) such Foreign Plan is in compliance with the provisions of the laws of each jurisdiction in which such Foreign Plan is maintained, to the extent those laws are applicable to such Foreign Plan; (ii) the Target, each Target Subsidiary, and each Target ERISA Affiliate has complied with all applicable reporting and notice requirements, and such Foreign Plan has obtained from the Governmental Authority having jurisdiction with respect to such Foreign Plan any required determinations, if any, that such Foreign Plan is in compliance with the laws of the relevant jurisdiction if such determinations are required in order to give effect to such Foreign Plan; and (iii) such Foreign Plan has been administered in accordance with its terms and applicable law and regulations.

        (l)    Section 4.11(l) of the Company Disclosure Schedule lists as of the date of this Agreement each employee of Target or any Target Subsidiary who is absent from work or not fully available to perform work according to his or her regular schedule because of a physical or mental impairment or other approved leave and also lists, with respect to each such employee, the basis of such leave and the anticipated date of return to full service. Section 4.11(l) of the Company Disclosure Schedule also lists

A-17


Table of Contents


as of the date of this Agreement each employee or former employee of Target or any Target Subsidiary who has applied for within the previous six (6) months or who is receiving short-term-disability, long-term-disability or similar benefits.

        (m)  Each Target Benefit Plan and, to the knowledge of Target, each Administaff Plan that is a "nonqualified deferred compensation plan" (as defined in Section 409A(d)(1) of the Code) (i) was operated from January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2008 in good faith compliance with Section 409A of the Code, IRS Notice 2005-1, and the Treasury Regulations issued pursuant to Section 409A of the Code, (ii) has been operated since January 1, 2009 in compliance with Section 409A of the Code and the final Treasury Regulations issued pursuant to Section 409A of the Code, and (iii) no nonqualified deferred compensation plan that is grandfathered pursuant to Section 409A of the Code has been "materially modified" (within the meaning of the applicable guidance issued pursuant to Section 409A of the Code) at any time after October 3, 2004.

        (n)   Attached as Section 4.11(n) of the Target Disclosure Schedule is (i) a summary or copy of Target's severance policy, (ii) a severance package table which lists the maximum amount of all cash amounts that may be paid to Target's employees as a result of or in connection with a severance from employment, and (iii) a list of employees of Target with written employment agreements, written letter agreements or agreements covered by resolution of the Target's Board of Directors addressing specific employees.

        (o)   Except as set forth in Section 4.11(o) of the Target Disclosure Schedule, no employee, independent contractor, or director of Target, any Target Subsidiary, or any Target ERISA Affiliate is eligible to receive, based on the actions of Target, any Target Subsidiary, or any Target ERISA Affiliate prior to the Effective Time, any bonus or other payment that is calculated by reference to, or otherwise based upon, the financial results or performance of Target, any Target Subsidiary, or any Target ERISA Affiliate for all or any portion of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010.


        4.12
    Environmental Liability.     Except as set forth in Section 4.12 of the Target Disclosure Schedule or as could not reasonably be expected to result in liabilities that have a Target Material Adverse Effect:

        (a)   The businesses of Target and its Subsidiaries have been and are operated in material compliance with all applicable federal, state and local statutes, ordinances, restrictions, licenses, rules, orders, regulations, permit conditions, injunctive obligations, standards, and legal requirements relating to the protection of the environment and human health, including the common law and the Federal Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking Water Act, Resource Conservation & Recovery Act, Clean Air Act, Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, and Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act, and their respective state statute counterparts each as amended and currently in effect (together, "Environmental Laws").

        (b)   Neither Target nor any of its Subsidiaries has caused or allowed the generation, treatment, manufacture, processing, distribution, use, storage, discharge, release, disposal, transport or handling of any chemicals, pollutants, contaminants, wastes, toxic substances, hazardous substances, petroleum, petroleum products or any substance regulated under any Environmental Law (together, "Hazardous Substances"), except in material compliance with all Environmental Laws, and, to Target's knowledge, no generation, treatment, manufacture, processing, distribution, use, storage, discharge, release, disposal, transport or handling of any Hazardous Substances has occurred at any property or facility owned, leased or operated by Target for any of its Subsidiaries except in material compliance with all Environmental Laws.

        (c)   Neither Target nor any of its Subsidiaries has received any written notice from any Governmental Authority or third party or, to the knowledge of Target, any other communication alleging or concerning any material violation by Target or any of its Subsidiaries of, or responsibility or liability of Target or any of its Subsidiaries under any Environmental Law. There are no pending, or to

A-18


Table of Contents


the knowledge of Target, threatened, claims, suits, actions, proceedings or investigations with respect to the businesses or operations of Target or any of its Subsidiaries alleging or concerning any material violation of, or responsibility or liability under, any Environmental Law, nor does Target have any knowledge of any fact or condition that could give rise to such a claim, suit, action, proceeding or investigation.

        (d)   Target and its Subsidiaries have obtained and are in compliance with all material approvals, permits, licenses, registrations and similar authorizations from all Governmental Authorities under all Environmental Laws required for the operation of the businesses of Target and its Subsidiaries as currently conducted ("Target Permits"); there are no pending or, to the knowledge of Target, threatened, actions, proceedings or investigations alleging violations of or seeking to modify, revoke or deny renewal of any of such approvals, permits, licenses, registrations and authorizations; and Target does not have knowledge of any fact or condition that is reasonably likely to give rise to any action, proceeding or investigation regarding the violation of or seeking to modify, revoke or deny renewal of any of such approvals, permits, licenses, registrations and authorizations.

        (e)   Without in any way limiting the generality of the foregoing, (i) to Target's knowledge, all offsite locations where Target or any of its Subsidiaries has transported, released, discharged, stored, disposed or arranged for the disposal of Hazardous Substances are licensed and operating as required by law and (ii) to Target's knowledge, no polychlorinated biphenyls ("PCBs"), PCB-containing items, asbestos-containing materials, or radioactive materials are used or stored at any property owned, leased or operated by Target or any of its Subsidiaries except in material compliance with Environmental Laws.

        (f)    No claims have been asserted or, to Target's knowledge, threatened to be asserted against Target or its Subsidiaries for any personal injury (including wrongful death) or property damage (real or personal) arising out of alleged exposure or otherwise related to Hazardous Substances used, handled, generated, transported or disposed by Target or its Subsidiaries.


        4.13
    Compliance with Applicable Laws.     

        (a)   Target and each of its Subsidiaries hold all material approvals, licenses, permits, registrations and similar authorizations necessary for the lawful conduct of their respective businesses, as now conducted, and such businesses are not being, and neither Target nor any of its Subsidiaries have received any notice from any Person that any such business has been or is being, conducted in violation of any law, ordinance or regulation, including any law, ordinance or regulation relating to occupational health and safety, except for possible violations that either individually or in the aggregate have not resulted and would not result in a Target Material Adverse Effect; provided, however, no representation or warranty in this Section 4.13 is made with respect to Environmental Laws, which are covered exclusively in Section 4.12.

        (b)   Neither Target, any Subsidiary of Target, nor, to the knowledge of Target, any director, officer, agent, employee or other person acting on behalf of Target or any of its Subsidiaries, has used any corporate or other funds for unlawful contributions, payments, gifts, or entertainment, or made any unlawful expenditures relating to political activity to government officials or others, or established or maintained any unlawful or unrecorded funds in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, or any other domestic or foreign law.


        4.14
    Insurance. Section 4.14     of the Target Disclosure Schedule lists each insurance policy of Target and its Subsidiaries currently in effect. Target has made available to Parent a true, complete and correct copy of each such policy and the binder therefor. With respect to each such insurance policy or binder none of Target, any of its Subsidiaries or, to Target's knowledge, any other party to the policy is in breach or default thereunder (including with respect to the payment of premiums or the giving of notices), and Target does not know of any occurrence or any event which (with notice or the lapse of time or both) would constitute such a breach or default or permit termination, modification or

A-19


Table of Contents

acceleration under the policy, except for such breaches or defaults which, individually or in the aggregate, would not result in a Target Material Adverse Effect. Section 4.14 of the Target Disclosure Schedule describes any self-insurance arrangements affecting Target or its Subsidiaries. To Target's knowledge, the insurance policies listed in Section 4.14 of the Target Disclosure Schedule include all policies which are required in connection with the operation of the businesses of Target and its Subsidiaries as currently conducted by applicable laws and all agreements relating to Target and its Subsidiaries.


        4.15
    Labor Matters; Employees.     

        (a)   Except as set forth in Section 4.15 of the Target Disclosure Schedule, (i) there is no labor strike, dispute, slowdown, work stoppage, lockout or other similar labor controversy actually pending or, to the knowledge of Target, threatened against or affecting Target or any of its Subsidiaries and, during the past five (5) years, there has not been any such action, (ii) none of Target or any of its Subsidiaries is a party to, bound by, or negotiating any collective bargaining or similar agreement with any labor organization (as that term is defined in the National Labor Relations Act, as amended), or work rules or practices with any labor organization or employee association applicable to employees of Target or any of its Subsidiaries, (iii) none of the employees of Target or any of its Subsidiaries are represented by any labor organization, none of Target or any of its Subsidiaries have any knowledge of any current union organizing activities among the employees of Target or any of its Subsidiaries nor does any question concerning representation exist concerning such employees, and neither Target nor any of its Subsidiaries have experienced any union organizational campaigns, petitions, or other unionization activities within the past three (3) years, (iv) Target and its Subsidiaries have each at all times within the past three (3) years been in material compliance with all applicable laws respecting employment and employment practices, equal employment opportunity, wages, labor relations, hours of work and overtime, worker classification, employment-related immigration and authorization to work in the United States, occupational safety and health, and privacy of health information, and are not engaged in any unfair labor practices as defined in the National Labor Relations Act or other applicable law, ordinance or regulation, (v) there is no unfair labor practice charge or complaint or any union representation question or certification petition against Target or any of its Subsidiaries pending or, to the knowledge of Target, threatened before the National Labor Relations Board or any similar state or foreign agency and there have been no such charges, complaints, questions or petitions within the past three (3) years, (vi) there are no pending or, to the knowledge of Target, threatened legal, arbitral or administrative suits, actions, investigations, charges, complaints, demands or other proceedings of any kind and in any forum by or on behalf of any current or former employee of Target or any of its Subsidiaries, applicant, person claiming to be an employee, or any classes of the foregoing, alleging or concerning a violation of, or compliance with, any applicable law respecting employment and employment practices, equal employment opportunity, wages, labor relations, hours of work and overtime, worker classification, employment-related immigration and authorization to work in the United States, occupational safety and health, and privacy of health information, there have been no such proceedings within the past three (3) years, nor are there any grievance or arbitration proceeding arising out of any collective bargaining agreement or other grievance procedure concerning Target or any of its Subsidiaries, (vii) there is no current or, to the knowledge of Target, threatened legal, arbitral or administrative suits, actions, investigations or other proceedings of any kind and in any forum in which any current or former director, officer, employee or agent of Target or any of its Subsidiaries is or may be entitled to indemnification, (viii) Target and all of its Subsidiaries have timely paid or made provision for payment of, and has properly accrued for in its or their financial statements, all accrued salaries, wages, commissions, bonuses, severance pay, vacation, sick, and other paid leave with respect to any current or former employee or on account of employment, (ix) no current or former employee or person claiming to be or have been an employee of Target or any of its Subsidiaries has a right to be recalled, reinstated, or restored to employment under any agreement, law, or policy or practice of Target or any of its Subsidiaries, (x) neither Target nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to, or otherwise

A-20


Table of Contents


bound by, any order, judgment, decree or settlement with respect to any current or former employee, the terms and conditions of employment, or the working conditions of any employee, (xi) neither Target nor any of its Subsidiaries has, and none are required by applicable law to have, an affirmative action plan, (xii) Target and its Subsidiaries have complied with the Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act with respect to any waivers of liability under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act obtained by it in the last 300 days, (xiii) neither the Occupational Safety and Health Administration nor any other federal or state agency has threatened to file any citation, and there are no pending citations, relating to Target or any of its Subsidiaries, and (xiv) there is no employee or governmental claim or investigation, including any charges to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or state employment practice agency, investigations regarding Fair Labor Standards Act compliance, audits by the Office of Federal Contractor Compliance Programs, Workers' Compensation claims, sexual or other workplace harassment complaints or demand letters or threatened claims.

        (b)   Within the past four (4) years, under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988, as amended ("WARN Act"), none of Target or any of its Subsidiaries has effectuated or experienced (i) a "plant closing" (as defined in the WARN Act), or (ii) a "mass layoff" (as defined in the WARN Act), nor has Target or any of its Subsidiaries been affected by any transaction or engaged in layoffs or employment terminations sufficient in number to trigger application of any state or local law similar to the WARN Act.


        4.16
    Reserve Reports.     

        (a)   All information (including the statement of the percentage of reserves from the oil and gas wells and other interests evaluated therein to which Target or its Subsidiaries are entitled and the percentage of the costs and expenses related to such wells or interests to be borne by Target or its Subsidiaries) supplied to Miller and Lents, Ltd. by or on behalf of Target and its Subsidiaries that was material to such firm's estimates of proved oil and gas reserves attributable to the Oil and Gas Interests (as hereinafter defined) of Target in connection with the preparation of the proved oil and gas reserve reports concerning the Oil and Gas Interests of Target and its Subsidiaries as of July 1, 2009 and prepared by such engineering firms (the "Target Reserve Report") was (at the time supplied or as modified or amended prior to the issuance of the Target Reserve Report) true and correct in all material respects and Target has no knowledge of any material errors in such information that existed at the time of such issuance, except as set forth in Section 4.16(a) of the Target Disclosure Schedule. For this Agreement "Oil and Gas Interests" means direct and indirect interests in and rights with respect to oil, gas, mineral, and related properties and assets of any kind and nature, direct or indirect, including working, leasehold and mineral interests and operating rights and royalties, overriding royalties, production payments, net profit interests and other non-working interests and non-operating interests; all interests in rights with respect to oil, condensate, gas, casinghead gas and other liquid or gaseous hydrocarbons (collectively, "Hydrocarbons") and other minerals or revenues therefrom, all contracts in connection therewith and claims and rights thereto (including all oil and gas leases, operating agreements, unitization and pooling agreements and orders, division orders, transfer orders, mineral deeds, royalty deeds, oil and gas sales, exchange and processing contracts and agreements, and in each case, interests thereunder), surface interests, fee interests, reversionary interests, reservations, and concessions; all easements, rights of way, licenses, permits, leases, and other interests associated with, appurtenant to, or necessary for the operation of any of the foregoing; and all interests in equipment and machinery (including wells, well equipment and machinery), oil and gas production, gathering, transmission, treating, processing, and storage facilities (including tanks, tank batteries, pipelines, and gathering systems), pumps, water plants, electric plants, gasoline and gas processing plants, refineries, and other tangible personal property and fixtures associated with, appurtenant to, or necessary for the operation of any of the foregoing. Except for changes generally affecting the oil and gas industry (including changes in commodity prices), there has been no change in respect of the matters addressed in the Target Reserve Report that would have a Target Material Adverse Effect.

A-21


Table of Contents

        (b)   Set forth in Section 4.16(b) of the Target Disclosure Schedule is a list of all material Oil and Gas Interests that were included in the Target Reserve Report that have been disposed of prior to the date hereof.


        4.17
    Permits.     Target and its Subsidiaries hold all of the permits, licenses, certificates, consents, approvals, entitlements, plans, surveys, relocation plans, environmental impact reports and other authorizations of Governmental Authorities ("Permits") required or necessary to construct, own, operate, use and/or maintain their respective properties and conduct their operations as presently conducted, except for such Permits, the lack of which, individually or in the aggregate, would not have a Target Material Adverse Effect; provided, however, that no representation or warranty in this Section 4.17 is made with respect to Permits issued pursuant to Environmental Laws, which are covered exclusively in Section 4.12(a).


        4.18
    Material Contracts.     

        (a)   Set forth in Section 4.18(a) of the Target Disclosure Schedule or the Target SEC Reports filed and publicly available prior to the date hereof is a list of each contract, lease, indenture, agreement, arrangement or understanding to which Target or any of its Subsidiaries is subject that is currently in effect and is of a type that would be required to be included as an exhibit to a Form S-1 Registration Statement pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC if such a registration statement were filed by Target (collectively, the "Target Material Contracts").

        (b)   Except as set forth in Section 4.18(a) or 4.18(b) of the Target Disclosure Schedule or the Target SEC Reports, the Oil and Gas Interests of Target and its Subsidiaries are not subject to (i) any instrument or agreement evidencing or related to indebtedness for borrowed money, whether directly or indirectly, or (ii) any agreement not entered into in the ordinary course of business in which the amount involved is in excess of $200,000 in the aggregate. In addition, (A) all Target Material Contracts are the valid and legally binding obligations of Target and, to the knowledge of Target, each of the other parties thereto and are enforceable in accordance with their respective terms; (B) Target is not in material breach or default with respect to, and to the knowledge of Target, no other party to any Target Material Contract is in material breach or default with respect to, its obligations thereunder, including with respect to payments or otherwise; (C) no party to any Target Material Contract has given notice of any action to terminate, cancel, rescind or procure a judicial reformation thereof; and (D) no Target Material Contract contains any provision that prevents Target or any of its Subsidiaries from owning, managing and operating the Oil and Gas Interests of Target and its Subsidiaries in accordance with historical practices.

        (c)   As of the date hereof, except as set forth in Section 4.18(c) of the Target Disclosure Schedule, with respect to authorizations for expenditure executed after December 31, 2008, (i) there are no outstanding calls for payments in excess of $200,000 that are due or that Target or its Subsidiaries are committed to make that have not been made; (ii) there are no material operations with respect to which Target or its Subsidiaries have become a non-consenting party; and (iii) there are no commitments for the material expenditure of funds for drilling or other capital projects other than projects with respect to which the operator is not required under the applicable operating agreement to seek consent.

        (d)   Except as set forth in Section 4.18(d) of the Target Disclosure Schedule, (i) there are no provisions applicable to the Oil and Gas Interests of Target and its Subsidiaries which increase the royalty percentage of the lessor thereunder; and (ii) none of the Oil and Gas Interests of Target and its Subsidiaries are limited by terms fixed by a certain number of years (other than primary terms under oil and gas leases).

A-22


Table of Contents

        (e)   Except as set forth in Section 4.18(e) of the Target Disclosure Schedule, neither Target nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to any contract or agreement of employment or to provide consulting, contractor or personal services that cannot be terminated at will without notice by and at no expense or liability to the Target and its Subsidiaries.


        4.19    Required Stockholder Vote.     The only votes of the holders of any class or series of Target's capital stock that shall be necessary to consummate the Transactions are the affirmative vote (in person or by proxy, or, in the case of the Target Preferred Shares, by written consent) of (a) the holders of a majority of the Target Preferred Shares, voting as a single class, in favor of an amendment (the "Series D CD Amendment") to the Certificate of Designations, Rights and Preferences of the Series D Convertible Preferred Stock of Cano Petroleum, Inc., dated August 31, 2006, as amended (the "Series D Certificate"), in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Parent and Target (which approval of the Series D CD Amendment shall not be unreasonably withheld by either Parent or Target) and in favor of the adoption of the Agreement; and (b) the holders of a majority of the Target Common Shares, voting as a single class, in favor of the Series D CD Amendment and in favor of the adoption of this Agreement (collectively, the "Target Stockholders' Approval").


        4.20
    Proxy/Prospectus; Registration Statement.     None of the information to be supplied by Target for inclusion in (a) the joint proxy statement relating to the Target Meeting and the Parent Meeting (in each case, as defined below) (also constituting the prospectus in respect of Parent Common Shares into which Target Common Shares will be converted) (the "Proxy/Prospectus") to be filed by Target and Parent with the SEC, and any amendments or supplements thereto, or (b) the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (the "Registration Statement") to be filed by Parent with the SEC in connection with the Merger, and any amendments or supplements thereto, will, at the respective times such documents are filed, and, in the case of the Proxy/Prospectus, at the time the Proxy/Prospectus or any amendment or supplement thereto is first mailed to the Target and Parent stockholders, at the time of the Target Meeting and the Parent Meeting and at the Effective Time, and, in the case of the Registration Statement, when it becomes effective under the Securities Act, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be made therein or necessary in order to make the statements made therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.


        4.21
    Intellectual Property.     Target or its Subsidiaries own, or are licensed or otherwise have the right to use, all patents, patent rights, trademarks, rights, trade names, trade name rights, service marks, service mark rights, copyrights, technology, know-how, processes and other proprietary intellectual property rights and computer programs ("Intellectual Property") currently used in the conduct of the business of Target and its Subsidiaries, except where the failure to so own or otherwise have the right to use such Intellectual Property would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Target Material Adverse Effect. No Person has notified either Target or any of its Subsidiaries in writing and Target does not have any knowledge that their use of the Intellectual Property infringes on the rights of any Person, subject to such claims and infringements as do not, individually or in the aggregate, give rise to any liability on the part of Target and its Subsidiaries that could have a Target Material Adverse Effect, and, to Target's knowledge, no Person is infringing on any right of Target or any of its Subsidiaries with respect to any such Intellectual Property. No claims are pending or, to Target's knowledge, threatened that Target or any of its Subsidiaries is infringing or otherwise adversely affecting the rights of any Person with regard to any Intellectual Property.


        4.22
    Hedging.     Section 4.22 of the Target Disclosure Schedule sets forth for the periods shown obligations of Target and each of its Subsidiaries (and their respective counterparties) for the delivery of Hydrocarbons attributable to any of the properties of Target or any of its Subsidiaries in the future on account of prepayment, advance payment, take-or-pay or similar obligations without then or thereafter being entitled to receive full value therefor. Except as set forth in Section 4.22 of the Target Disclosure Schedule, as of the date hereof, neither Target nor any of its Subsidiaries is bound by

A-23


Table of Contents

futures, hedge, swap, collar, put, call, floor, cap, option or other contracts that are intended to benefit from, relate to or reduce or eliminate the risk of fluctuations in the price of commodities, including Hydrocarbons, or securities.


        4.23
    Brokers.     No broker, finder or investment banker (other than RBC Capital Markets Corporation, the fees and expenses of which will be paid by Target) is entitled to any brokerage, finder's fee or other fee or commission payable by Target or any of its Subsidiaries in connection with the Transactions based upon arrangements made by and on behalf of Target or any of its Subsidiaries. True and correct copies of all agreements and engagement letters currently in effect with RBC Capital Markets Corporation (the "Target Engagement Letters") have been provided to Target.


        4.24
    Tax-Free Reorganization.     Neither Target nor, to the knowledge of Target, any of its affiliates has taken or agreed to take any action that would prevent the Merger from constituting a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.


        4.25
    Fairness Opinion.     Target's Board of Directors has received an opinion from RBC Capital Markets Corporation to the effect that, as of the date of such opinion, the Exchange Ratio is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Target Common Shares.


        4.26
    Takeover Laws.     No "fair price", "moratorium", "control share acquisition" or other similar antitakeover statute or regulation enacted under state or federal laws in the United States (with the exception of Section 203 of the DGCL) applicable to Target is applicable to the Merger or the other transactions contemplated hereby. The action of the Board of Directors of Target in approving this Agreement (and the Transactions provided for herein) is sufficient to render inapplicable to this Agreement (and the Transactions provided for herein) the restrictions on "business combinations" (as defined in Section 203 of the DGCL) as set forth in Section 203 of the DGCL.


ARTICLE V

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND MERGER SUB

        Parent and Merger Sub hereby jointly and severally represent and warrant to Target as follows:


        5.1
    Organization and Qualification.     

        (a)   Parent is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of Texas, is duly qualified to do business as a foreign corporation and is in good standing in the jurisdictions set forth in Section 5.1(a) of the disclosure letter delivered by Parent to Target contemporaneously with the execution hereof (the "Parent Disclosure Schedule"), which include each jurisdiction in which the character of Parent's properties or the nature of its business makes such qualification necessary, except in jurisdictions, if any, where the failure to be so qualified would not result in a Parent Material Adverse Effect (as defined below). Merger Sub is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of Delaware, is duly qualified to do business as a foreign corporation and is in good standing in the jurisdictions set forth in Section 5.1(a) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, which include each jurisdiction in which the character of Merger Sub's properties or the nature of its business makes such qualification necessary, except in jurisdictions, if any, where the failure to be so qualified would not result in a Parent Material Adverse Effect (as defined below). Each Parent Party has all requisite corporate power and authority to own, use or lease its properties and to carry on its business as it is now being conducted. Each Parent Party has made available to Target a complete and correct copy of its Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws (or other similar organizational documents), each as amended to date, and Parent's and Merger Sub's Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws (or other similar organizational documents) as made available are in full force and effect. Neither Parent nor Merger Sub is in default in any respect in the performance, observation or fulfillment of any provision of its Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws (or other similar organizational documents). Merger Sub is a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Parent

A-24


Table of Contents


formed solely for the purpose of effecting the Merger and has conducted no activity and has incurred no liability or obligation other than as contemplated by this Agreement.

        (b)   The minute books of Parent and Merger Sub contain true, complete and accurate Corporate Records. Copies of such Corporate Records of Parent and Merger Sub have been heretofore made available to Target or Target's counsel.

        (c)   The stock, warrant and option ownership and transfer records of Parent and Merger Sub contain true, complete and accurate records of the securities ownership as of the date of such records and the transfers involving the capital stock and other securities of Parent and Merger Sub. Copies of such records of Parent and Merger Sub have been heretofore made available to Target or Target's counsel.

        (d)   Section 5.1(d) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule lists the name and jurisdiction of organization of each Subsidiary of Parent (other than Merger Sub) and the jurisdictions in which each such Subsidiary is qualified or holds licenses to do business as a foreign corporation or other organization as of the date hereof. Except for Parent's Subsidiaries, Parent does not own, directly or indirectly, any ownership, equity, profits or voting interest in any Person, other than equity interests held for investment that are not, in the aggregate, material to Parent (other than joint operating and other ownership arrangements and tax partnerships entered into in the ordinary course of business that, individually or in the aggregate, are not material to the operations or business of Parent and Parent's Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, and that do not entail any material liabilities). Each of Parent's Subsidiaries is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of its jurisdiction of incorporation, is duly qualified to do business as a foreign corporation and is in good standing in the jurisdictions listed in Section 5.1(d) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, which includes each jurisdiction in which the character of such Subsidiary's properties or the nature of its business makes such qualification necessary, except in jurisdictions, if any, where the failure to be so qualified would not result in a Parent Material Adverse Effect. Each of Parent's Subsidiaries has the requisite corporate power and authority to own, use or lease its properties and to carry on its business as it is now being conducted and as it is now proposed to be conducted. Parent has made available to Target a complete and correct copy of the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws (or similar organizational documents) of each of Parent's Subsidiaries, each as amended to date, and the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws (or similar organizational documents) as made available are in full force and effect. No Subsidiary of Parent is in default in any respect in the performance, observation or fulfillment of any provision of its Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws (or similar organizational documents). Other than Parent's Subsidiaries, Parent does not beneficially own or control, directly or indirectly, five percent (5%) or more of any class of equity or similar securities of any corporation or other organization, whether incorporated or unincorporated.

        (e)   Complete and correct copies of the corporate, partnership or limited liability company records of each of Parent's Subsidiaries have been heretofore made available to Target or Target's counsel.

        (f)    For purposes of this Agreement, a "Parent Material Adverse Effect" means any event, circumstance, condition, development or occurrence causing, resulting in or having (or with the passage of time likely to cause, result in or have) a material adverse effect on the financial condition, business, assets, properties or results of operations of Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole; provided that, in no event shall any of the following alone or in combination be deemed, in and of itself, to constitute or be taken into account in determining a Parent Material Adverse Effect: any event, circumstance, change or effect that results from (i) changes affecting the national or regional economy generally or the oil and gas industry generally (provided that Parent is not disproportionately affected by such changes), (ii) changes in the market price of oil or natural gas, (iii) the public announcement or pending nature of the Transactions, (iv) compliance with the terms of, or taking any action required by, this Agreement, (v) change in the price or trading volume of the Target Common Shares or the

A-25


Table of Contents


Parent Common Shares, (vi) the outbreak or escalation of hostilities involving the United States, the declaration by the United States of a national emergency or war or the occurrence of any other calamity or crisis, including acts of terrorism or (vii) any change in the accounting requirements or principles imposed on Parent or its business by GAAP or any change in applicable law after the date hereof.

        5.2    Capitalization.    

        (a)   The authorized capital stock of Parent consists of 230,000,000 Parent Common Shares, and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock of Parent, par value $0.01 per share ("Parent Preferred Shares"). A Certificate of Designations, Rights and Preferences of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Parent (the "Parent Series A Shares") will be filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Texas prior to the Closing and will be substantially in the form attached as Exhibit 5.2 unless otherwise agreed by the Parent and Target. As of the date hereof, Parent has (i) 96,947,494 Parent Common Shares issued and outstanding, (ii) no Parent Common Shares in treasury, (iii) no Parent Preferred Shares outstanding, (iv) outstanding Parent Options to acquire 2,151,787 Parent Common Shares under stock option plans or agreements of Parent (of which Parent Options to purchase an aggregate of 568,929 shares of Parent Common Shares are exercisable as of the date hereof) and (v) 2,737,010 Parent Restricted Shares issued and outstanding. There are no bonds, debentures, notes or other indebtedness issued or outstanding having the right to vote with Parent's stockholders, whether together or as a separate class, on any matters on which Parent's stockholders may vote. All of the outstanding Parent Common Shares are validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable, and free of preemptive rights. Except as set forth above or in Section 5.2(a)(i) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, and other than this Agreement, there are no outstanding subscriptions, options, rights, warrants, convertible securities, stock appreciation rights, phantom equity, or other agreements or commitments (including "rights plans" or "poison pills") obligating Parent to issue, transfer, sell, redeem, repurchase or otherwise acquire any shares of its capital stock of any class. Except as set forth in Section 5.2(a)(ii) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule there are no registration rights, and there is no voting trust, proxy, rights plan, antitakeover plan or other agreement, arrangement or other understanding to which Parent is a party or by which Parent is bound with respect to any equity security of any class of Parent.

        (b)   Except as set forth in Section 5.2(b) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, Parent is, directly or indirectly, the record and beneficial owner of all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of each Parent Subsidiary, there are no irrevocable proxies with respect to any such shares, and no equity securities of any Parent Subsidiary are or may become required to be issued because of any options, warrants, rights to subscribe to, calls or commitments of any character whatsoever relating to, or securities or rights convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for, shares of any capital stock of any Parent Subsidiary, and there are no contracts, commitments, understandings or arrangements by which Parent or any Parent Subsidiary is or may be bound to issue additional shares of capital stock of any Parent Subsidiary or securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any such shares. Except as set forth in Section 5.2(b) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, all of such shares Parent owns are validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable and are owned by it free and clear of all Liens.

        (c)   Parent Common Shares are listed on the AIM under the symbols "RSOX" and "RSX." No action or proceeding is pending or, to the knowledge of Parent, threatened against Parent by the AIM or any other Governmental Authority regulating issuers on AIM with respect to Parent, the Parent Common Shares or, solely with respect to the Nomad's engagement with Parent as its nominated advisor, the Nomad. For purposes of this Agreement, phrases such as "knowledge of Parent" and similar terms mean the current knowledge, after due inquiry, of any Vice President (including the corporate officer with responsibility for human resources and employee benefits) or the President, Chief Executive Officer or Chairman of Parent. For purposes of this Agreement, the "Nomad" means the Parent's nominated advisor Seymour Pierce Limited.

A-26


Table of Contents


        5.3
    Authority.     Each of Parent and, solely with respect to this Agreement, Merger Sub, has full corporate power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements to which it is or will be a party, subject to obtaining the Parent Stockholders' Approval to consummate the Transactions. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements to which it is or will be a party and the consummation of the Transactions have been duly and validly authorized by each Parent Party's Board of Directors, and no other corporate proceedings on the part of either Parent Party are necessary to authorize this Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements to which any of them are or will be a party or to consummate the Transactions, other than the Parent Stockholders' Approval and approval of the sole stockholder of Merger Sub. This Agreement has been, and the Ancillary Agreements to which Parent or Merger Sub is or will be a party are, or upon execution will be, duly and validly executed and delivered by each Parent Party and, assuming the due authorization, execution and delivery hereof and thereof by the other parties hereto and thereto, constitutes or upon execution will constitute, valid and binding obligations of each Parent Party enforceable against such Persons in accordance with their respective terms, except for the Enforceability Exception.


        5.4
    Consents and Approvals; No Violation.     The execution and delivery of this Agreement, the consummation of the Transactions and the performance by each Parent Party of its obligations hereunder will not:

        (a)   subject to receipt of the Parent Stockholders' Approval, conflict with any provision of the Certificate of Formation or Bylaws, as amended, of Parent or the Certificates of Incorporation or Bylaws (or other similar organizational documents) of any of Parent's Subsidiaries;

        (b)   subject to obtaining the Parent Stockholders' Approval and the filing of the Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State of Delaware, require any consent, waiver, approval, order, authorization or permit of, or registration, filing with or notification to, (i) any Governmental Authority, except for applicable requirements of the HSR Act, the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, state laws relating to takeovers, if applicable, state securities or blue sky laws, the publication of the Readmission Document to be compiled in accordance with the provisions of the AIM Rules and the notification of the Merger in accordance with the AIM Rules and Customary Post-Closing Consents or (ii) except as set forth in Section 5.4(b) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, any third party other than a Governmental Authority, other than such non-Governmental Authority third party consents, waivers, approvals, orders, authorizations and permits that would not (i) result in a Parent Material Adverse Effect, (ii) materially impair the ability of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries to perform its obligations under this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement or (iii) prevent the consummation of any of the Transactions;

        (c)   except as set forth in Section 5.4(c) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, result in any violation of or the breach of or constitute a default (with notice or lapse of time or both) under, or give rise to any right of termination, cancellation or acceleration or guaranteed payments or a loss of a material benefit under, any of the terms, conditions or provisions of any note, lease, mortgage, license, agreement or other instrument or obligation to which Parent or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by which Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective properties or assets may be bound, except for such violations, breaches, defaults, or rights of termination, cancellation or acceleration, or losses as to which requisite waivers or consents have been obtained or which, individually or in the aggregate, would not (A) result in a Parent Material Adverse Effect, (B) materially impair the ability of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries to perform its obligations under this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement or (C) prevent the consummation of any of the Transactions;

        (d)   violate the provisions of any order, writ, injunction, judgment, decree, statute, rule or regulation applicable to Parent or any of its Subsidiaries;

A-27


Table of Contents

        (e)   result in the creation of any Lien upon any material properties or assets or on any shares of capital stock of Parent or its Subsidiaries (other than Target and its Subsidiaries after the Effective Time) under any agreement or instrument to which Parent or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by which Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their properties or assets is bound; or

        (f)    result in any holder of any securities of Parent being entitled to appraisal, dissenters' or similar rights.


        5.5
    Parent AIM Reports.     

        (a)   Parent has filed with the AIM, and has heretofore made available to Target, true and complete copies of, each form, admission document, report, schedule, proxy, announcement or information statement and other document (including exhibits and amendments thereto), including its annual reports to stockholders incorporated by reference in certain of such reports, required to be filed by it or publicly announced with the AIM in connection with and since its admission to the AIM on July 17, 2008 (collectively, the "Parent AIM Reports"). As of the respective dates the Parent AIM Reports were filed or, if any such Parent AIM Reports were amended, as of the date such amendment was filed, each Parent AIM Report, including any financial statements or schedules included therein, (i) complied in all material respects with the applicable rules and regulations of the AIM, and (ii) did not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. No event since the date of the last Parent AIM Report has occurred that would require Parent to file a report with the AIM other than the execution of this Agreement.

        (b)   The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Parent will make in the Registration Statement to be filed by Parent with the SEC in connection with Merger, all certifications (without qualification or exceptions to the matters certified) required by, and will be able to make such certifications (without qualification or exception to the matters certified) as of the Closing Date as if required to be made as of such date pursuant to, the Sarbanes Oxley Act and any related rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC, and the statements contained in any such certifications are complete and correct. Parent has in place sufficient procedures, resources and controls to enable it to comply with the AIM Rules. Parent seeks the advice and guidance from the Nomad regarding the compliance by Parent with the AIM Rules whenever it considers it appropriate and it takes any such advice and guidance into account. As used herein, "AIM Rules" means the rules issued by the London Stock Exchange governing companies applying for or with a class of shares admitted to AIM.


        5.6
    Parent Financial Statements.     Each of the audited consolidated financial statements for Parent for the years ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, and when issued the audited consolidated financial statements for Parent for the year ended June 30, 2009, and the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of Parent (including any related notes and schedules) included (or incorporated by reference) for the six (6) month period ended December 31, 2008 have been prepared from, and are in accordance with, the books and records of Parent and its consolidated Subsidiaries, comply in all material respects with applicable accounting requirements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP applied on a consistent basis (except as may be indicated in the notes thereto and subject, in the case of quarterly financial statements, to normal and recurring year-end adjustments) and fairly present, in conformity with GAAP applied on a consistent basis (except as may be indicated in the notes thereto), the consolidated financial position of Parent and its Subsidiaries as of the date thereof and the consolidated results of operations and cash flows (and changes in financial position, if any) of Parent and its Subsidiaries for the periods presented therein (subject to normal year-end adjustments and the absence of financial footnotes in the case of any unaudited interim financial statements).


        5.7
    Absence of Undisclosed Liabilities.     Except (a) as set forth in Section 5.7 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule and (b) for liabilities and obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business

A-28


Table of Contents

and consistent with past practice since June 30, 2009, neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries has incurred any liabilities or obligations of any nature (contingent or otherwise) that would have a Parent Material Adverse Effect or would be required by GAAP to be reflected on a consolidated balance sheet of Parent and its Subsidiaries or the notes thereto which are not reflected.


        5.8
    Absence of Certain Changes.     Except as set forth in Section 5.8 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule or as contemplated by this Agreement, since June 30, 2009 (a) Parent and its Subsidiaries have conducted their respective businesses only in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practices, (b) there has not been any change or development, or combination of changes or developments that, individually or in the aggregate, would have a Parent Material Adverse Effect, (c) there has not been any declaration, setting aside or payment of any dividend or other distribution with respect to any shares of capital stock of Parent, or any repurchase, redemption or other acquisition by Parent or any of its Subsidiaries of any outstanding shares of capital stock or other securities of, or other ownership interests in, Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, (d) there has not been any amendment of any term of any outstanding security of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, and (e) there has not been any change in any method of accounting or accounting practice by Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, except for any such change required because of a concurrent change in GAAP or to conform a Subsidiary's accounting policies and practices to those of Parent.


        5.9
    Taxes.     Except as otherwise disclosed in Section 5.9 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule and for matters that would not have a Parent Material Adverse Effect:

        (a)   Parent and each of its Subsidiaries have timely filed (or have had timely filed on their behalf) or will file or cause to be timely filed, all material Tax Returns required by applicable law to be filed by any of them prior to or as of the Closing Date. As of the time of filing, the foregoing Tax Returns correctly reflected the material facts regarding the income, business, assets, operations, activities, status, or other matters of Parent or any other information required to be shown thereon. In particular, the foregoing tax returns are not subject to penalties under Section 6662 of the Code, relating to accuracy related penalties (or any corresponding provision of the state, local or foregoing Tax law) or any predecessor provision of law. An extension of time within which to file a Tax Return has not been requested or granted.

        (b)   Parent and each of its Subsidiaries have paid (or have had paid on their behalf), or where payment is not yet due, have established (or have had established on their behalf and for their sole benefit and recourse), or will establish or cause to be established on or before the Closing Date, an adequate accrual for the payment of all material Taxes (as defined below) due with respect to any period ending prior to or as of the Closing Date. Parent and each of its Subsidiaries have withheld and paid all Taxes required to have been withheld and paid in connection with any amounts paid or owing to any employee, independent contractor, creditor, stockholder, or other third party.

        (c)   No Audit by a Tax Authority is pending or, to the knowledge of Parent, threatened with respect to any Tax Returns filed by, or Taxes due from, Parent or any Subsidiary. No issue has been raised by any Tax Authority in any Audit of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries that if raised with respect to any other period not so audited could be expected to result in a material proposed deficiency for any period not so audited. No material deficiency or adjustment for any Taxes has been proposed, asserted, assessed or, to the knowledge of Parent, threatened against Parent or any of its Subsidiaries. There are no liens for Taxes upon the assets of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, except liens for current Taxes not yet delinquent.

        (d)   Neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries has given or been requested to give any waiver of statutes of limitations relating to the payment of Taxes or have executed powers of attorney with respect to Tax matters, which will be outstanding as of the Closing Date.

A-29


Table of Contents

        (e)   Prior to the date hereof, Parent and its Subsidiaries have disclosed, and provided or made available to Target true and complete copies of, all material Tax sharing, Tax indemnity, or similar agreements to which Parent or any of its Subsidiaries are a party to, is bound by, or has any obligation or liability for Taxes.

        (f)    Except as set forth in Section 5.9 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, and except for the group of which Parent is currently a member and any group affiliated with Resaca Exploitation, Inc., Parent has never been a member of an affiliated group of corporations, within the meaning of Section 1504 of the Code.

        (g)   Parent has not agreed to make nor is it required to make any adjustment under Section 481(a) of the Code by reason of change in accounting method or otherwise.

        (h)   None of the Parent or any of its Subsidiaries has a liability for Taxes of any Person under Regulation Section 1.1502-6 (or any similar provision of state, local or foreign law), as a transferee or successor, by contract or otherwise.

        (i)    None of the Parent or any of its Subsidiaries has a liability for Taxes of any Person (other than Parent or any of its Subsidiaries) under Regulation Section 1.1502-6 (or any similar provision of state, local or foreign law) as a transferee or successor, by control or otherwise.

        (j)    Neither Parent nor any of its subsidiaries has distributed stock of another person, or has had its stock distributed by another Person, in a transaction that also purported or intended to be governed in whole or in part by Code Sections 355 and 361. Any transaction described in Section 5.9 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule that were purported or intended to be governed by Code Section 355 and 361 will not result in the recognition of a gain by the Parent as a result of the Merger.


        5.10
    Litigation.     Except as otherwise disclosed in Section 5.10 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, there is no suit, claim, action, proceeding or investigation pending or, to Parent's knowledge, threatened against or directly affecting Parent, any Subsidiaries of Parent or any of the directors or officers of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries in their capacity as such, nor is there any reasonable basis therefor that could reasonably be expected to have a Parent Material Adverse Effect, if adversely determined. Neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries, nor any officer, director or employee of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, has been permanently or temporarily enjoined by any order, judgment or decree of any court or any other Governmental Authority from engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with the business, assets or properties of Parent or such Subsidiary, nor, to the knowledge of Parent, is Parent, any Subsidiary or any officer, director or employee of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries under investigation by any Governmental Authority. Except as disclosed in Section 5.10 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, there is no order, judgment or decree of any court or other tribunal or other agency extant enjoining or requiring Parent or any of its Subsidiaries to take any action of any kind with respect to its business, assets, properties, employees or former employees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no representation or warranty in this Section 5.10 is made with respect to Environmental Laws, which are covered exclusively by the provisions set forth in Section 5.12.


        5.11
    Employee Benefit Plans; ERISA.     

        (a)   Section 5.11(a) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule lists as of the date of this Agreement all "employee benefit plans," as defined in Section 3(3) ERISA, and all other material employee compensation and benefit plans, agreements, programs, policies or other arrangements, including, without limitation, any employment or service agreements (except for offer letters providing for at will employment that do not provide for severance, acceleration or post termination benefits and other at will arrangements that may be terminated without notice by and at no expense or liability to Parent, any Parent Subsidiary, or any Parent ERISA Affiliate), severance, short-term and long-term disability, paid leave, vacation pay, consulting or other compensation agreements, deferred compensation, bonus, long-term incentive programs in the form of restricted stock grants, stock option grants or other equity

A-30


Table of Contents


or phantom equity, supplemental unemployment, medical insurance including medical, dental, vision, and prescription coverage, life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance, tuition aid reimbursement, relocation assistance, employee or former employee loans in excess of $10,000, expatriate benefits, retiree medical and life insurance maintained by Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or any Parent ERISA Affiliate or to which Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or any Parent ERISA Affiliate contributes or is obligated to contribute (all of the foregoing described, collectively, but exclusive of any Foreign Plan, the "Parent Benefit Plans"). A "Parent ERISA Affiliate" is any trade or business, whether or not incorporated, which together with Parent would be deemed a "single employer" within the meaning of Section 414(b), (c) or (m) of the Code or Section 4001(b)(1) of ERISA.

        (b)   Parent has not, since July 30, 2002, extended credit, arranged for the extension of credit, or renewed, modified or forgiven an extension of credit made prior to such date, in the form of a personal loan to or for any Person who was, at any time since such date, an officer or director of the Parent.

        (c)   Prior to the date of this Agreement, Parent has made available to Target a true, correct and complete copy of each of the Parent Benefit Plans (and all amendments thereto) and any related plan documents (including adoption agreements, vendor Contracts and administrative services agreements, trust documents, insurance policies or contracts including policies relating to fiduciary liability insurance, bonds required by ERISA, other authorizing documents, employee booklets, summary plan descriptions, registration statements and prospectuses, investment policy statements, and summaries of material modifications and any material employee communications relating thereto) and has, with respect to each Parent Benefit Plan that is subject to ERISA reporting requirements, made available to Target true, correct and complete copies of the Form 5500 reports filed for the last three (3) plan years (including all audits, financial statements, schedules and attachments thereto) and all notices that were given to Parent or a Parent Benefit Plan by the Internal Revenue Service, Department of Labor, or other Governmental Authority concerning any Parent Benefit Plan.

        Each of Parent and each Parent Subsidiary has made available to Target a true, correct and complete list of the names of all current officers, directors and consultants of Parent and each Parent Subsidiary showing each such Person's name, position, location and rate of annual remuneration.

        Each of Parent and each Parent Subsidiary has made available to Target true, correct and complete copies of each of the following:

A-31


Table of Contents

        (d)   With respect to each Parent Benefit Plan:

A-32


Table of Contents

With respect to the Parent Benefit Plans, neither Parent nor any Parent ERISA Affiliate has engaged in, and Parent and each Parent ERISA Affiliate do not have any knowledge of any Person that has engaged in, any "prohibited transaction" (within the meaning of Section 406 of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code) for which no exemption exists under Section 408 of ERISA or Section 4975(c) of the Code or Section 4975(d) of the Code.

        (e)   Neither Parent nor any Parent Subsidiary or Parent ERISA Affiliate is a party to, or has ever made any contribution to or otherwise incurred any obligation under, any "multiemployer plan" as such term is defined in Section 3(37) of ERISA or any "multiple employer plan" as such term is defined in Section 413(c) of the Code. There has been no termination or partial termination of any Parent Benefit Plan within the meaning of Section 411(d)(3) of the Code. Neither Parent nor any Parent ERISA Affiliate has ever established, maintained or contributed to, or had an obligation to maintain or contribute to, any "employee benefit plan" within the meaning of Section 3(3) of ERISA that is subject to Title IV of ERISA or Section 412 of the Code.

        No event has occurred with respect to Parent or a Parent ERISA Affiliate in connection with which Parent or any Parent Subsidiary could be subject to any liability, lien or encumbrance with respect to any Parent Benefit Plan or any employee benefit plan described in Section 3(3) of ERISA maintained, sponsored or contributed to by a Parent ERISA Affiliate under ERISA or the Code, except for regular contributions and benefit payments in the ordinary course of plan business.

        Except as provided in Section 5.11(e) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, neither Parent nor any Parent Subsidiary nor any Parent ERISA Affiliate sponsors or maintains any self-funded employee benefit plan, including any plan to which a stop-loss policy applies.

        (f)    Except as set forth in Section 5.11(f) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, no present or former employees of Parent or any Parent Subsidiary are covered by any agreements or plans that provide or will provide severance pay, post-termination health or life insurance benefits (other than as required under COBRA or applicable state law) or any similar benefits.

        (g)   Except as set forth in Section 5.11(g) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, the consummation of the Transactions shall not cause any payments or benefits to any employee to be either subject to an excise tax under Sections 4999 of the Code or non-deductible to Parent under Section 280G or 162(m) of the Code. Section 5.11(g) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule lists each Person who Parent reasonably believes is, with respect to Parent, any Parent Subsidiary and/or any Parent ERISA Affiliate, a "disqualified individual" (within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder) determined as of the date hereof.

        (h)   Except as disclosed in Section 5.11(h) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, none of the execution and delivery of this Agreement, the consummation of the Merger or any other transaction contemplated hereby or any termination of employment or service in connection therewith or subsequent thereto will:

A-33


Table of Contents

        (i)    With respect to each Parent Benefit Plan subject to ERISA as either an "employee pension benefit plan" within the meaning of Section 3(2) of ERISA or an "employee welfare benefit plan" within the meaning of Section 3(1) of ERISA, Parent has prepared in good faith and timely filed all requisite governmental reports (which were true, correct and complete as of the date filed), including any required audit reports, and has properly and timely filed and distributed or posted all notices and reports to employees required to be filed, distributed or posted with respect to each such Parent Benefit Plan.

        (j)    Each Foreign Plan is listed in Section 5.11(j) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule except for plans maintained by Governmental Authorities. As regards each Foreign Plan: (i) such Foreign Plan is in compliance with the provisions of the laws of each jurisdiction in which such Foreign Plan is maintained, to the extent those laws are applicable to such Foreign Plan; (ii) the Parent, each Parent Subsidiary, and each Parent ERISA Affiliate has complied with all applicable reporting and notice requirements, and such Foreign Plan has obtained from the Governmental Authority having jurisdiction with respect to such Foreign Plan any required determinations, if any, that such Foreign Plan is in compliance with the laws of the relevant jurisdiction if such determinations are required in order to give effect to such Foreign Plan; and (iii) such Foreign Plan has been administered in accordance with its terms and applicable law and regulations.

        (k)   Section 5.11(k) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule lists as of the date of this Agreement each employee of Parent or any Parent Subsidiary who is absent from work or not fully available to perform work according to his or her regular schedule because of a physical or mental impairment or other approved leave and also lists, with respect to each such employee, the basis of such leave and the anticipated date of return to full service. Section 5.11(k) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule also lists as of the date of this Agreement each employee or former employee of Parent or any Parent Subsidiary who has applied for within the previous six (6) months, who has indicated an intent to apply for, or who is receiving short-term-disability, long-term-disability, or similar benefits.

        (l)    Each Parent Benefit Plan that is a "nonqualified deferred compensation plan" (as defined in Section 409A(d)(1) of the Code) (i) was operated from January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2008 in good faith compliance with Section 409A of the Code, IRS Notice 2005-1, and the Treasury Regulations issued pursuant to Section 409A of the Code, (ii) has been operated since January 1, 2009 in compliance with Section 409A of the Code and the final Treasury Regulations issued pursuant to Section 409A of the Code, and (iii) no nonqualified deferred compensation plan that is grandfathered pursuant to Section 409A of the Code has been "materially modified" (within the meaning of the applicable guidance issued pursuant to Section 409A of the Code) at any time after October 3, 2004.

        (m)  Attached as Section 5.11(m) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule is (i) a summary or copy of Parent's severance policy, (ii) a severance package table which lists the maximum amount of all cash amounts that may be paid to Parent's employees as a result of or in connection with a severance from employment, and (iii) a list of employees of Parent with written employment agreements, written letter agreements or agreements covered by resolution of the Parent's Board of Directors addressing specific employees.

A-34


Table of Contents


        5.12
    Environmental Liability.     Except as set forth in Section 5.12 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule or as could not reasonably be expected to result in liabilities that have a Parent Material Adverse Effect:

        (a)   The businesses of Parent and its Subsidiaries have been and are operated in material compliance with all Environmental Laws.

        (b)   Neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries has caused or allowed the generation, treatment, manufacture, processing, distribution, use, storage, discharge, release, disposal, transport or handling of any Hazardous Substances, except in material compliance with all Environmental Laws, and, to Parent's knowledge, no generation, treatment, manufacture, processing, distribution, use, storage, discharge, release, disposal, transport or handling of any Hazardous Substances has occurred at any property or facility owned, leased or operated by Parent for any of its Subsidiaries except in material compliance with all Environmental Laws.

        (c)   Neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries has received any written notice from any Governmental Authority or third party or, to the knowledge of Parent, any other communication alleging or concerning any material violation by Parent or any of its Subsidiaries of, or responsibility or liability of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries under any Environmental Law. There are no pending, or to the knowledge of Parent, threatened, claims, suits, actions, proceedings or investigations with respect to the businesses or operations of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries alleging or concerning any material violation of, or responsibility or liability under, any Environmental Law, nor does Parent have any knowledge of any fact or condition that could give rise to such a claim, suit, action, proceeding or investigation.

        (d)   Parent and its Subsidiaries have obtained and are in compliance with all material approvals, permits, licenses, registrations and similar authorizations from all Governmental Authorities under all Environmental Laws required for the operation of the businesses of Parent and its Subsidiaries as currently conducted; there are no pending or, to the knowledge of Parent, threatened, actions, proceedings or investigations alleging violations of or seeking to modify, revoke or deny renewal of any of such approvals, permits, licenses, registrations and authorizations; and Parent does not have knowledge of any fact or condition that is reasonably likely to give rise to any action, proceeding or investigation regarding the violation of or seeking to modify, revoke or deny renewal of any of such approvals, permits, licenses, registrations and authorizations.

        (e)   Without in any way limiting the generality of the foregoing, (i) to Parent's knowledge, all offsite locations where Parent or any of its Subsidiaries has transported, released, discharged, stored, disposed or arranged for the disposal of Hazardous Substances are licensed and operating as required by law and (ii) to Parent's knowledge, no PCBs, PCB-containing items, asbestos-containing materials, or radioactive materials are used or stored at any property owned, leased or operated by Parent or any of its Subsidiaries except in material compliance with Environmental Laws.

        (f)    No claims have been asserted or, to Parent's knowledge, threatened to be asserted against Parent or its Subsidiaries for any personal injury (including wrongful death) or property damage (real or personal) arising out of alleged exposure or otherwise related to Hazardous Substances used, handled, generated, transported or disposed by Parent or its Subsidiaries.


        5.13
    Compliance with Applicable Laws.     

        (a)   Parent and each of its Subsidiaries hold all material approvals, licenses, permits, registrations and similar authorizations necessary for the lawful conduct of their respective businesses, as now conducted, and such businesses are not being, and neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries have received any notice from any Person that any such business has been or is being, conducted in violation of any law, ordinance or regulation, including any law, ordinance or regulation relating to occupational health and safety, except for possible violations that either individually or in the aggregate have not

A-35


Table of Contents


resulted and would not result in a Parent Material Adverse Effect; provided, however, no representation or warranty in this Section 5.13 is made with respect to Environmental Laws, which are covered exclusively in Section 5.12.

        (b)   Neither Parent, any Subsidiary of Parent, nor, to the knowledge of Parent, any director, officer, agent, employee or other person acting on behalf of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, has used any corporate or other funds for unlawful contributions, payments, gifts, or entertainment, or made any unlawful expenditures relating to political activity to government officials or others, or established or maintained any unlawful or unrecorded funds in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, or any other domestic or foreign law.


        5.14
    Insurance.     Section 5.14 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule lists each insurance policy of Parent and its Subsidiaries currently in effect. Parent has made available to Target a true, complete and correct copy of each such policy or the binder therefor. With respect to each such insurance policy or binder none of Parent, any of its Subsidiaries or, to Parent's knowledge, any other party to the policy is in breach or default thereunder (including with respect to the payment of premiums or the giving of notices), and Parent does not know of any occurrence or any event which (with notice or the lapse of time or both) would constitute such a breach or default or permit termination, modification or acceleration under the policy, except for such breaches or defaults which, individually or in the aggregate, would not result in a Parent Material Adverse Effect. Section 5.14 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule describes any self-insurance arrangements affecting Parent or its Subsidiaries. To Parent's knowledge, the insurance policies listed in Section 5.14 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule include all policies which are required in connection with the operation of the businesses of Parent and its Subsidiaries as currently conducted by applicable laws and all agreements relating to Parent and its Subsidiaries.


        5.15
    Labor Matters; Employees.     

        (a)   Except as set forth in Section 5.15 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, (i) there is no labor strike, dispute, slowdown, work stoppage, lockout or other similar labor controversy actually pending or, to the knowledge of Parent, threatened against or affecting Parent or any of its Subsidiaries and, during the past five (5) years, there has not been any such action, (ii) none of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries is a party to, bound by, or negotiating any collective bargaining or similar agreement with any labor organization (as that term is defined in the National Labor Relations Act, as amended), or work rules or practices with any labor organization or employee association applicable to employees of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, (iii) none of the employees of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries are represented by any labor organization, none of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries have any knowledge of any current union organizing activities among the employees of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries nor does any question concerning representation exist concerning such employees, and neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries have experienced any union organizational campaigns, petitions, or other unionization activities within the past three (3) years, (iv) Parent and its Subsidiaries have each at all times within the past three (3) years been in material compliance with all applicable laws respecting employment and employment practices, equal employment opportunity, wages, labor relations, hours of work and overtime, worker classification, employment-related immigration and authorization to work in the United States, occupational safety and health, and privacy of health information, and are not engaged in any unfair labor practices as defined in the National Labor Relations Act or other applicable law, ordinance or regulation, (v) there is no unfair labor practice charge or complaint or any union representation question or certification petition against Parent or any of its Subsidiaries pending or, to the knowledge of Parent, threatened before the National Labor Relations Board or any similar state or foreign agency and there have been no such charges, complaints, questions or petitions within the past three (3) years, (vi) there are no pending or, to the knowledge of Parent, threatened legal, arbitral or administrative suits, actions, investigations, charges, complaints, demands or other proceedings of any kind and in any forum by or on behalf of any current or former employee of Parent or any of its

A-36


Table of Contents


Subsidiaries, applicant, person claiming to be an employee, or any classes of the foregoing, alleging or concerning a violation of, or compliance with, any applicable law respecting employment and employment practices, equal employment opportunity, wages, labor relations, hours of work and overtime, worker classification, employment-related immigration and authorization to work in the United States, occupational safety and health, and privacy of health information, there have been no such proceedings within the past three (3) years, nor are there any grievance or arbitration proceeding arising out of any collective bargaining agreement or other grievance procedure concerning Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, (vii) there is no current or, to the knowledge of Parent, threatened legal, arbitral or administrative suits, actions, investigations or other proceedings of any kind and in any forum in which any current or former director, officer, employee or agent of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries is or may be entitled to indemnification, (viii) Parent and all of its Subsidiaries have timely paid or made provision for payment of, and has properly accrued for in its or their financial statements, all accrued salaries, wages, commissions, bonuses, severance pay, vacation, sick, and other paid leave with respect to any current or former employee or on account of employment, (ix) no current or former employee or person claiming to be or have been an employee of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries has a right to be recalled, reinstated, or restored to employment under any agreement, law, or policy or practice of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, (x) neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to, or otherwise bound by, any order, judgment, decree or settlement with respect to any current or former employee, the terms and conditions of employment, or the working conditions of any employee, (xi) neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries has, and none are required by applicable law to have, an affirmative action plan, (xii) Parent and its Subsidiaries have complied with the Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act with respect to any waivers of liability under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act obtained by it in the last 300 days, (xiii) neither the Occupational Safety and Health Administration nor any other federal or state agency has threatened to file any citation, and there are no pending citations, relating to Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, and (xiv) there is no employee or governmental claim or investigation, including any charges to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or state employment practice agency, investigations regarding Fair Labor Standards Act compliance, audits by the Office of Federal Contractor Compliance Programs, Workers' Compensation claims, sexual or other workplace harassment complaints or demand letters or threatened claims.

        (b)   Within the past four (4) years, under the WARN Act, none of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries has effectuated or experienced (i) a "plant closing" (as defined in the WARN Act), or (ii) a "mass layoff" (as defined in the WARN Act), nor has Parent or any of its Subsidiaries been affected by any transaction or engaged in layoffs or employment terminations sufficient in number to trigger application of any state or local law similar to the WARN Act.


        5.16
    Reserve Reports.     

        (a)   All information (including the statement of the percentage of reserves from the oil and gas wells and other interests evaluated therein to which Parent or its Subsidiaries are entitled and the percentage of the costs and expenses related to such wells or interests to be borne by Parent or its Subsidiaries) supplied to Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc. and Haas Petroleum Engineering Services, Inc. by or on behalf of Parent and its Subsidiaries that was material to such firm's estimates of proved oil and gas reserves attributable to the Oil and Gas Interests (as hereinafter defined) of Parent in connection with the preparation of the proved oil and gas reserve reports concerning the Oil and Gas Interests of Parent and its Subsidiaries as of July 1, 2009 and prepared by such engineering firm (the "Parent Reserve Report") was (at the time supplied or as modified or amended prior to the issuance of the Parent Reserve Report) true and correct in all material respects and Parent has no knowledge of any material errors in such information that existed at the time of such issuance except as set forth in Section 5.16(a) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule. Except for changes generally affecting the oil and gas industry (including changes in commodity prices), there has been no change in respect of the matters addressed in the Parent Reserve Report that would have a Parent Material Adverse Effect.

A-37


Table of Contents

        (b)   Set forth in Section 5.16(b) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule or the Parent AIM Reports is a list of all material Oil and Gas Interests that were included in the Parent Reserve Report that have been disposed of prior to the date hereof.


        5.17
    Permits.     Parent and its Subsidiaries hold all of the Permits required or necessary to construct, own, operate, use and/or maintain their respective properties and conduct their operations as presently conducted, except for such Permits, the lack of which, individually or in the aggregate, would not have a Parent Material Adverse Effect; provided, however, that no representation or warranty in this Section 5.17 is made with respect to Permits issued pursuant to Environmental Laws, which are covered exclusively in Section 5.11(a).


        5.18
    Material Contracts.     

        (a)   Set forth in Section 5.18(a) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule or the Parent AIM Reports is a list of each contract, lease, indenture, agreement, arrangement or understanding to which Parent or any of its Subsidiaries is subject that is currently in effect and is of a type that would be required to be included as an exhibit to a Form S-1 Registration Statement pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC if such a registration statement were filed by Parent (collectively, the "Parent Material Contracts").

        (b)   Except as set forth in Section 5.18(a) or 5.18(b) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule or the Parent AIM Reports filed and publicly available prior to the date hereof, the Oil and Gas Interests of Parent and its Subsidiaries are not subject to (i) any instrument or agreement evidencing or related to indebtedness for borrowed money, whether directly or indirectly, or (ii) any agreement not entered into in the ordinary course of business in which the amount involved is in excess of $200,000 in the aggregate. In addition, (A) all Parent Material Contracts are the valid and legally binding obligations of Parent and, to the knowledge of Parent, each of the other parties thereto and are enforceable in accordance with their respective terms; (B) Parent is not in material breach or default with respect to, and to the knowledge of Parent, no other party to any Parent Material Contract is in material breach or default with respect to, its obligations thereunder, including with respect to payments or otherwise; (C) no party to any Parent Material Contract has given notice of any action to terminate, cancel, rescind or procure a judicial reformation thereof; and (D) except as set forth in the Parent AIM Reports filed and publicly available prior to the date hereof no Parent Material Contract contains any provision that prevents Parent or any of its Subsidiaries from owning, managing and operating the Oil and Gas Interests of Parent and its Subsidiaries in accordance with historical practices.

        (c)   As of the date hereof, except as set forth in Section 5.18(c) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, with respect to authorizations for expenditure executed after December 31, 2008, (i) there are no outstanding calls for payments in excess of $200,000 that are due or that Parent or its Subsidiaries are committed to make that have not been made; (ii) there are no material operations with respect to which Parent or its Subsidiaries have become a non-consenting party; and (iii) there are no commitments for the material expenditure of funds for drilling or other capital projects other than projects with respect to which the operator is not required under the applicable operating agreement to seek consent.

        (d)   Except as set forth in Section 5.18(d) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, (i) there are no provisions applicable to the Oil and Gas Interests of Parent and its Subsidiaries which increase the royalty percentage of the lessor thereunder; and (ii) none of the Oil and Gas Interests of Parent and its Subsidiaries are limited by terms fixed by a certain number of years (other than primary terms under oil and gas leases or unit agreements).


        5.19
    Required Stockholder Vote.     The only vote of the holders of any class or series of Parent's capital stock that shall be necessary to consummate the Transactions is the approval by a majority of the votes cast by the holders of the Parent Common Shares (the "Parent Stockholders' Approval").

A-38


Table of Contents


        5.20
    Proxy/Prospectus; Registration Statement.     None of the information to be supplied by Parent and, with respect to clause (c) only, its directors for inclusion in (a) the Proxy/Prospectus to be filed by Target and Parent with the SEC, and any amendments or supplements thereto, (b) the Registration Statement to be filed by Parent with the SEC in connection with the Merger, or (c) the Readmission Document to be compiled in accordance with the AIM Rules, and any amendments or supplements thereto, will, at the respective times such documents are filed, and, in the case of the Proxy/Prospectus, at the time the Proxy/Prospectus or any amendment or supplement thereto is first mailed to the Target and Parent stockholders, at the time of the Target Meeting and the Parent Meeting and at the Effective Time, and, in the case of the Registration Statement, when it becomes effective under the Securities Act, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be made therein or necessary in order to make the statements made therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.


        5.21
    Intellectual Property.     Parent or its Subsidiaries own, or are licensed or otherwise have the right to use, all Intellectual Property currently used in the conduct of the business of Parent and its Subsidiaries, except where the failure to so own or otherwise have the right to use such Intellectual Property would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Parent Material Adverse Effect. No Person has notified either Parent or any of its Subsidiaries in writing and Parent does not have any knowledge that their use of the Intellectual Property infringes on the rights of any Person, subject to such claims and infringements as do not, individually or in the aggregate, give rise to any liability on the part of Parent and its Subsidiaries that could have a Parent Material Adverse Effect, and, to Parent's knowledge, no Person is infringing on any right of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries with respect to any such Intellectual Property. No claims are pending or, to Parent's knowledge, threatened that Parent or any of its Subsidiaries is infringing or otherwise adversely affecting the rights of any Person with regard to any Intellectual Property.


        5.22
    Hedging.     Section 5.22 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule sets forth for the periods shown obligations of Parent and each of its Subsidiaries (and their respective counterparties) for the delivery of Hydrocarbons attributable to any of the properties of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries in the future on account of prepayment, advance payment, take-or-pay or similar obligations without then or thereafter being entitled to receive full value therefor. Except as set forth in Section 5.22 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, as of the date hereof, neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries is bound by futures, hedge, swap, collar, put, call, floor, cap, option or other contracts that are intended to benefit from, relate to or reduce or eliminate the risk of fluctuations in the price of commodities, including Hydrocarbons, or securities.


        5.23
    Brokers.     No broker, finder or investment banker (other than SMH Capital, the fees and expenses of which will be paid by Parent) is entitled to any brokerage, finder's fee or other fee or commission payable by Parent or any of its Subsidiaries in connection with the Transactions based upon arrangements made by and on behalf of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries. True and correct copies of all agreements and engagement letters currently in effect with SMH Capital (the "Parent Engagement Letters") have been provided to Target.


        5.24
    Tax Matters.     Neither Parent nor, to the knowledge of Parent, any of its affiliates has taken or agreed to take any action that would prevent the Merger from constituting a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.


        5.25
    Takeover Laws.     No "fair price", "moratorium", "control share acquisition" or other similar antitakeover statute or regulation enacted under state or federal laws in the United States (with the exception of Section 203 of the DGCL) applicable to Parent is applicable to the Merger or the other transactions contemplated hereby. The action of the Board of Directors of Parent in approving this Agreement (and the Transactions provided for herein) is sufficient to render inapplicable to this Agreement (and the Transactions provided for herein) the restrictions on "business combinations" (as defined in Section 203 of the DGCL) as set forth in Section 203 of the DGCL.

A-39


Table of Contents


ARTICLE VI

CONDUCT OF BUSINESS PENDING THE MERGER

        6.1    Conduct of Business by Target Pending the Merger.     From the date hereof until the Effective Time, except as Parent otherwise agrees in writing, as set forth in Section 6.1 of the Target Disclosure Schedule, or as otherwise contemplated by this Agreement, Target shall conduct its business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice and shall use all commercially reasonable efforts to preserve intact its business organizations and relationships with third parties and to keep available the services of its present officers and key employees, subject to the terms of this Agreement. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, from the date hereof until the Effective Time, without Parent's prior written consent (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned):

        (a)   Target shall not adopt or propose any change to its Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws (or similar organizational documents);

        (b)   Target shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, (i) declare, set aside or pay any dividend or other distribution with respect to any shares of capital stock of Target or its Subsidiaries (except for intercompany dividends from direct or indirect wholly owned Subsidiaries and regular quarterly dividends with respect to the Series D Stock) or (ii) repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any outstanding shares of capital stock or other securities of, or other ownership interests in, Target or any of its Subsidiaries, other than intercompany acquisitions of stock;

        (c)   Target shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, merge or consolidate with any other Person or acquire assets of any other Person for aggregate consideration in excess of $2,500,000 in any single transaction (or series of related transactions) or $5,000,000 in the aggregate, or enter a new line of business or commence business operations in any country in which Target is not operating as of the date hereof;

        (d)   Except as set forth in Section 6.1(d) of the Target Disclosure Schedule, Target shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, sell, lease, license or otherwise surrender, relinquish or dispose of any assets or properties (other than to Parent and its direct and indirect wholly owned Subsidiaries) with an aggregate fair market value exceeding $2,500,000 in any single transaction (or series of related transactions) or $5,000,000 in the aggregate (other than sales of Hydrocarbons in the ordinary course of business);

        (e)   Target shall not settle any material Audit, make or change any material Tax election or file any material amended Tax Return except as set forth in Section 4.9 of the Target Disclosure Schedule;

        (f)    Except as otherwise permitted by this Agreement and the terms of any refinancing of indebtedness in connection with the Transactions, or as set forth in Section 6.1(f) of the Target Disclosure Schedule, Target shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, (i) issue any securities (whether through the issuance or granting of options, warrants, rights or otherwise and except pursuant to existing obligations disclosed in the Target Disclosure Schedule), (ii) enter into any amendment of any term of any outstanding security of Target or of any of its Subsidiaries, (iii) incur any indebtedness except trade debt in the ordinary course of business and debt pursuant to existing credit facilities or arrangements or any refinancing thereof (except as set forth in Section 6.1(f) of the Target Disclosure Schedule), (iv) fail to make any required contribution to any Target Benefit Plan, (v) increase compensation or bonuses (except for compensation or bonuses as set forth in Section 6.1(f) of the Target Disclosure Schedule) or increase other benefits payable to (except for payments pursuant to 401(k) plans), or, except as required by applicable law, modify or amend any employment agreements or severance agreements with, any executive officer or former employee or (vi) enter into any settlement or consent with respect to any pending litigation other than settlements in the ordinary course of business;

A-40


Table of Contents

        (g)   Target shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, change any method of accounting or accounting practice by Target or any of its Subsidiaries except for any such change required by GAAP;

        (h)   Target shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, take any action that would give rise to a claim under the WARN Act or any similar state law or regulation because of a "plant closing" or "mass layoff" (each as defined in the WARN Act) or other layoff without in good faith attempting to comply with the WARN Act and any similar state law or regulation requiring notice to employees before layoffs;

        (i)    Target shall not amend or otherwise change the terms of the Target Engagement Letters, except to the extent that any such amendment or change would result in terms more favorable to Target;

        (j)    Except for expenditures set forth in Section 6.1(j) of the Target Disclosure Schedule, neither Target nor any of its Subsidiaries shall become bound or obligated to participate in any operation, or consent to participate in any operation, with respect to any Oil and Gas Interests that will, in the aggregate, cost in excess of $1,000,000 in any single transaction (or series of related transactions) or $5,000,000 in the aggregate;

        (k)   Target and its Subsidiaries shall timely meet their royalty payment obligations in connection with their respective oil and gas leases;

        (l)    Target shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, (i) enter into any futures, hedge, swap, collar, put, call, floor, cap, option or other contracts that are intended to benefit from or reduce or eliminate the risk of fluctuations in the price of commodities, including Hydrocarbons or securities, other than in the ordinary course of business in accordance with Target's current policies or (ii) enter into any fixed price commodity sales agreements with a duration of more than three (3) months;

        (m)  Target shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, (i) adopt, amend (other than amendments that reduce the amounts payable by Target or any Subsidiary, or amendments required by law to preserve the qualified status of a Target Benefit Plan or otherwise comply with ERISA, the Code or other applicable law) or assume an obligation to contribute to any pension, profit-sharing or other retirement, bonus, deferred compensation, incentive compensation, stock purchase, stock option, severance or termination pay, hospitalization or other medical, life or other insurance, long- or short-term disability, supplemental unemployment benefit, fringe benefit, sick pay, vacation pay, employment or retention agreement, consulting agreement, or other similar plan, program, agreement, or arrangement of any type or collective bargaining agreement or enter into any employment, severance or similar contract with any Person (including contracts with management of Target or any Subsidiary that might require that payments be made upon consummation of the Transactions) or amend any such existing contracts to increase any amounts payable thereunder or benefits provided thereunder, except for employment offers to "at-will" employees whose aggregate annual compensation is less than $100,000, (ii) engage in any transaction (either acting alone or in conjunction with any Target Benefit Plan or trust created thereunder) in connection with which Target or any Subsidiary could be subjected (directly or indirectly) to either a civil penalty assessed pursuant to subsections (c), (i) or (l) of Section 502 of ERISA or a tax imposed pursuant to Chapter 43 of Subtitle D of the Code, (iii) terminate any Target Benefit Plan in a manner, or take any other action with respect to any Target Benefit Plan, that could result in the liability of Target or any Subsidiary to any person, (iv) take any action that could adversely affect the qualification of any Target Benefit Plan or its compliance with the applicable requirements of ERISA, (v) fail to make full payment when due of all amounts which, under the provisions of any Target Benefit Plan, any agreement relating thereto or applicable law, Target or any Subsidiary is required to pay as contributions thereto, (vi) take any action which would result in the inclusion in gross income of deferred compensation under Section 409A of the Code or (vii) fail to file,

A-41


Table of Contents


on a timely basis, all reports and forms required by federal regulations with respect to any Target Benefit Plan;

        (n)   Target shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, (i) approve an increase in salary for any Target Employees or (ii) without Parent's prior written consent (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld), terminate any Target Employee entitled to any severance payment upon such termination;

        (o)   Target shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, organize or acquire any Person that could become a Subsidiary;

        (p)   Target shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, enter into any commitment or agreement to license or purchase seismic data that will cost in excess of $500,000, other than pursuant to agreements or commitments existing on the date hereof;

        (q)   Target shall not adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation, dissolution, or reorganization; and

        (r)   Target shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, agree or commit to do any of the foregoing.


        6.2
    Conduct of Business by Parent Pending the Merger.     From the date hereof until the Effective Time, except as Target otherwise agrees in writing, as set forth in Section 6.2 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, or as otherwise contemplated by this Agreement, Parent shall conduct its business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to preserve intact its business organizations and relationships with third parties and to keep available the services of its present officers and key employees, subject to the terms of this Agreement. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, from the date hereof until the Effective Time, without Target's prior written consent (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned):

        (a)   Parent shall not adopt or propose any change to its Certificate of Formation or Bylaws (or similar organizational documents);

        (b)   Parent shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to (i) declare, set aside or pay any dividend or other distribution with respect to any shares of capital stock of Parent or its subsidiaries (except for intercompany dividends from direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiaries), or (ii) repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any outstanding shares of capital stock or other securities of, or other ownership interests in, Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, other than intercompany acquisitions of stock;

        (c)   Parent shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, merge or consolidate with any other Person or acquire assets of any other Person for aggregate consideration in excess of $2,500,000 in any single transaction (or series of related transactions) or $5,000,000 in the aggregate, or enter a new line of business or commence business operations in any country in which Parent is not operating as of the date hereof;

        (d)   Except as set forth in Section 6.2 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, Parent shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, sell, lease, license or otherwise surrender, relinquish or dispose of any assets or properties (other than to Target and its direct and indirect wholly owned Subsidiaries) with an aggregate fair market value exceeding $2,500,000 in any single transaction (or series of related transactions) or $5,000,000 in the aggregate (other than sales of Hydrocarbons in the ordinary course of business);

        (e)   Parent shall not settle any material Audit, make or change any material Tax election or file any material amended Tax Return except as set forth in Section 5.9 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule;

A-42


Table of Contents

        (f)    Except as otherwise permitted by this Agreement and the terms of any refinancing of indebtedness in connection with the Transactions, Parent shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, (i) issue any securities (whether through the issuance or granting of options, warrants, rights or otherwise), (ii) enter into any amendment of any term of any outstanding security of Parent or of any of its Subsidiaries, (iii) incur any indebtedness except trade debt in the ordinary course of business and debt pursuant to existing credit facilities or arrangements or any refinancing thereof (except as set forth in Section 6.2 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule), (iv) fail to make any required contribution to any Parent Benefit Plan, (v) increase compensation or bonuses (except for compensation or bonuses as set forth in Section 6.2 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule) or increase other benefits payable to (except for payments pursuant to 401(k) plans), or, except as required by applicable law, modify or amend any employment agreements or severance agreements with, any executive officer or former employee or (vi) enter into any settlement or consent with respect to any pending litigation other than settlements in the ordinary course of business;

        (g)   Parent shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, change any method of accounting or accounting practice by Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, except for any such change required by GAAP;

        (h)   Parent shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, take any action that would give rise to a claim under the WARN Act or any similar state law or regulation because of a "plant closing" or "mass layoff" (each as defined in the WARN Act) or other layoff without in good faith attempting to comply with the WARN Act and any similar state law or regulation requiring notice to employees before layoffs;

        (i)    Parent shall not amend or otherwise change the terms of the Parent Engagement Letters, except to the extent that any such amendment or change would result in terms more favorable to Parent;

        (j)    Except as set forth in Section 6.2 of the Parent Disclosure Schedule, neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries shall become bound or obligated to participate in any operation, or consent to participate in any operation, with respect to any Oil and Gas Interests that will, in the aggregate, cost in excess of $1,000,000 in any single transaction (or series of related transactions) or $5,000,000 in the aggregate;

        (k)   Parent and its Subsidiaries shall timely meet their royalty payment obligations in connection with their respective oil and gas leases;

        (l)    Parent shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, (i) enter into any futures, hedge, swap, collar, put, call, floor, cap, option or other contracts that are intended to benefit from or reduce or eliminate the risk of fluctuations in the price of commodities, including Hydrocarbons or securities, other than in the ordinary course of business in accordance with Parent's current policies, or (ii) enter into any fixed price commodity sales agreements with a duration of more than three (3) months;

        (m)  Parent shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, (i) adopt, amend (other than amendments that reduce the amounts payable by Parent or any Subsidiary, or amendments required by law to preserve the qualified status of a Parent Benefit Plan or otherwise comply with ERISA, the Code or other applicable law) or assume an obligation to contribute to any pension, profit-sharing or other retirement, bonus, deferred compensation, incentive compensation, stock purchase, stock option, severance or termination pay, hospitalization or other medical, life or other insurance, long- or short-term disability, supplemental unemployment benefit, fringe benefit, sick pay, vacation pay, employment or retention agreement, consulting agreement, or other similar plan, program, agreement, or arrangement of any type or collective bargaining agreement or enter into any employment, severance or similar contract with any Person (including contracts with management of Parent or any Subsidiary

A-43


Table of Contents


that might require that payments be made upon consummation of the Transactions) or amend any such existing contracts to increase any amounts payable thereunder or benefits provided thereunder, except for employment offers to "at-will" employees whose aggregate annual compensation is less than $100,000, (ii) engage in any transaction (either acting alone or in conjunction with any Parent Benefit Plan or trust created thereunder) in connection with which Parent or any Subsidiary could be subjected (directly or indirectly) to either a civil penalty assessed pursuant to subsections (c), (i) or (l) of Section 502 of ERISA or a tax imposed pursuant to Chapter 43 of Subtitle D of the Code, (iii) terminate any Parent Benefit Plan in a manner, or take any other action with respect to any Parent Benefit Plan, that could result in the liability of Parent or any Subsidiary to any person, (iv) take any action that could adversely affect the qualification of any Parent Benefit Plan or its compliance with the applicable requirements of ERISA, (v) fail to make full payment when due of all amounts which, under the provisions of any Parent Benefit Plan, any agreement relating thereto or applicable law, Parent or any Subsidiary is required to pay as contributions thereto, (vi) take any action which would result in the inclusion in gross income of deferred compensation under Section 409A of the Code or (vii) fail to file, on a timely basis, all reports and forms required by federal regulations with respect to any Parent Benefit Plan provided;

        (n)   Parent shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, (i) approve an increase in salary for any Parent Employees or (ii) without Target's prior written consent (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld), terminate any Parent Employee entitled to any severance payment upon such termination;

        (o)   Parent shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, organize or acquire any Person that could become a Subsidiary;

        (p)   Parent shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, enter into any commitment or agreement to license or purchase seismic data that will cost in excess of $500,000, other than pursuant to agreements or commitments existing on the date hereof;

        (q)   Parent shall not adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation, dissolution, or reorganization; and

        (r)   Parent shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, agree or commit to do any of the foregoing.


ARTICLE VII

ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS

        7.1    Access and Information.     Unless otherwise prohibited by applicable law, the parties shall each afford to the other and to the other's financial advisors, legal counsel, accountants, consultants, financing sources and other authorized representatives access during normal business hours throughout the period prior to the Effective Time to all of its books, records, properties, contracts, leases, plants and personnel and, during such period, each shall furnish promptly to the other (a) a copy of each report, schedule and other document filed or received by it pursuant to the requirements of federal or state securities laws, and (b) all other information as such other party reasonably may request, provided that no investigation pursuant to this Section 7.1 shall affect any representations or warranties made herein or the conditions to the obligations of the respective parties to consummate the Merger. Each party shall hold in confidence all nonpublic information until such time as such information is otherwise publicly available and, if this Agreement is terminated, each party will deliver to the other all documents, work papers and other materials (including copies) obtained by such party or on its behalf from the other party as a result of this Agreement or in connection herewith, whether so obtained before or after the execution hereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Confidentiality Agreement,

A-44


Table of Contents

dated March 13, 2009, by and between Parent and Target (the "Confidentiality Agreement") shall survive the execution and delivery of this Agreement.

        (a)   From the date hereof until the Effective Time or, if earlier, the termination of this Agreement in accordance with its terms, Target and its Subsidiaries shall not, and shall cause their respective officers, directors, employees, investment bankers, attorneys or other agents not to, directly or indirectly,

Nothing contained in this Section 7.2 shall prohibit Target and its Board of Directors from (x) taking and disclosing a position with respect to a tender offer by a third party pursuant to Rules 14d-9 and 14e-2(a) under the Exchange Act, (y) waiving, or agreeing to waive, any provision of any stand-still or similar agreement in effect on the date hereof to allow a Person to make a Target Acquisition Proposal, so long as simultaneously with such waiver, such parties become subject to stand-still provisions at least as restrictive as those in the Confidentiality Agreement, or (z) prior to obtaining the Target Stockholders' Approval, furnishing information, including nonpublic information to, or entering into negotiations with, any Person that has submitted an unsolicited bona fide written Target Acquisition Proposal made not in violation of this Agreement or any standstill agreement if, and only to the extent that (with respect to this Section 7.2 only):

        (b)   For purposes of this Agreement:

A-45


Table of Contents

        (c)   Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, prior to obtaining the Target Stockholders' Approval, nothing in this Agreement shall prevent Target or the Target Board of Directors from, subject to compliance by Target with this Section 7.2:

provided, however, that

A-46


Table of Contents

For the avoidance of doubt, the parties acknowledge and agree that a Target Adverse Recommendation Change may or may not involve a Target Acquisition Proposal.

        (d)   If Target or any officer, director, employee, attorney, investment banker or other agent of Target or any Target Subsidiary receives a request for information from a Person who has made an unsolicited bona fide written Target Acquisition Proposal, and Target is permitted to provide such Person with information pursuant to this Section 7.2, Target will provide written notice to Parent to the effect that it is furnishing information to, or entering into discussions or negotiations with, such Person, and Target will use commercially reasonable efforts to keep Parent informed in all material respects of the status and terms of any such negotiations or discussions (including the identity of the Person with whom such negotiations or discussions are being held) and provide Parent copies of such written proposals and any amendments or revisions thereto or correspondence related thereto; provided, that Parent agrees to execute a confidentiality agreement, in form reasonably acceptable to it, with respect to any such information delivered to Parent pursuant to this clause (d), which confidentiality agreement shall be subject to Parent's disclosure obligations arising under applicable law or securities exchange regulations.

        (e)   Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Target Board of Directors shall not (1) make a Target Acquisition Recommendation Change, (2) make a Target Acquisition Proposal Recommendation or (3) enter into any Target Acquisition Agreement relating to a Target Acquisition Proposal, unless:

        (f)    All notices to be given by the Parties under this Section 7.2 shall be given by facsimile in accordance with Section 11.1 (which notice shall be considered delivered effective as of the day of transmission if transmitted on or before 5:00 p.m. U.S. Central Standard Time on the date of transmission, otherwise the next day after transmission).

A-47


Table of Contents

        (g)   Without limiting the foregoing, it is agreed that any violation of the restrictions set forth in this Section 7.2 by any officer, director, employee, attorney, investment banker or other agent of Target or any Target Subsidiary, whether or not such person is purporting to act on behalf of Target or any Target Subsidiary or otherwise, shall be a breach of this Section 7.2 by Target.


        7.3
    Parent Acquisition Proposals.     From the date hereof until the Effective Time or, if earlier, the termination of this Agreement in accordance with its terms, Parent and its Subsidiaries shall not, and shall cause their respective officers, directors, employees, investment bankers, attorneys or other agents not to, directly or indirectly,

Nothing contained in this Section 7.3 shall prohibit Parent and its Board of Directors from (x) taking and disclosing a position with respect to a tender offer by a third party pursuant to Rules 14d-9 and 14e-2(a) under the Exchange Act, (y) waiving, or agreeing to waive, any provision of any stand-still or similar agreement in effect on the date hereof to allow a Person to make a Parent Acquisition Proposal, so long as simultaneously with such waiver, such parties become subject to stand-still provisions at least as restrictive as those in the Confidentiality Agreement, or (z) prior to obtaining the Parent Stockholders' Approval, furnishing information, including nonpublic information to, or entering into negotiations with, any Person that has submitted an unsolicited bona fide written Parent Acquisition Proposal made not in violation of this Agreement or any standstill agreement if, and only to the extent that (with respect to this Section 7.3 only):

        (b)   For purposes of this Agreement:

A-48


Table of Contents

        (c)   Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, prior to obtaining the Parent Stockholders' Approval, nothing in this Agreement shall prevent Parent or the Parent Board of Directors from, subject to compliance by Parent with this Section 7.3:

provided, however, that

A-49


Table of Contents

For the avoidance of doubt, the Parties acknowledge and agree that a Parent Adverse Recommendation Change may or may not involve a Parent Acquisition Proposal.

        (d)   If Parent or any officer, director, employee, attorney, investment banker or other agent of Parent or any Parent Subsidiary receives a request for information from a Person who has made an unsolicited bona fide written Parent Acquisition Proposal, and Parent is permitted to provide such Person with information pursuant to this Section 7.3, Parent will provide written notice to Target to the effect that it is furnishing information to, or entering into discussions or negotiations with, such Person, and Parent will use commercially reasonable efforts to keep Target informed in all material respects of the status and terms of any such negotiations or discussions (including the identity of the Person with whom such negotiations or discussions are being held) and provide Target copies of such written proposals and any amendments or revisions thereto or correspondence related thereto; provided, that Target agrees to execute a confidentiality agreement, in form reasonably acceptable to it, with respect to any such information delivered to Target pursuant to this clause (d), which confidentiality agreement shall be subject to Target's disclosure obligations arising under applicable law or securities exchange regulations.

        (e)   Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Parent Board of Directors shall not (1) make a Parent Acquisition Recommendation Change, (2) make a Parent Acquisition Proposal Recommendation or (3) enter into any Parent Acquisition Agreement relating to a Parent Acquisition Proposal, unless:

        (f)    All notices to be given by the Parties under this Section 7.3 shall be given by facsimile in accordance with Section 11.1 (which notice shall be considered delivered effective as of the day of transmission if transmitted on or before 5:00 p.m. U.S. Central Standard Time on the date of transmission, otherwise the next day after transmission).

A-50


Table of Contents

        (g)   Without limiting the foregoing, it is agreed that any violation of the restrictions set forth in this Section 7.3 by any officer, director, employee, attorney, investment banker or other agent of Parent or any Parent Subsidiary, whether or not such person is purporting to act on behalf of Parent or any Parent Subsidiary or otherwise, shall be a breach of this Section 7.3 by Parent.


        7.4    Directors' and Officers' Indemnification and Insurance.     

        (a)   Directors and Officers of Target.

A-51


Table of Contents

        (b)   Directors and Officers of Parent.

A-52


Table of Contents


        7.5
    Further Assurances.     Each party shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain all consents and approvals and to do all other things necessary for the consummation of the Transactions. The parties shall take such further action to deliver or cause to be delivered to each other at the Closing and at such other times thereafter as shall be reasonably agreed by such parties such additional agreements or instruments as any of them may reasonably request for the purpose of carrying out this Agreement and the Transactions. The parties shall afford each other access to all information, documents, records and personnel who may be necessary for any party to comply with laws or regulations (including the filing and payment of taxes and handling tax audits), to fulfill its obligations with respect to indemnification hereunder or to defend itself against suits or claims of others. Parent and Target shall duly preserve all files, records or any similar items of Parent or Target received or obtained as a result of the Transactions with the same care and for the same period of time as it would preserve its own similar assets.


        7.6
    Expenses.     

        (a)   Except as provided in Sections 7.19 and 10.3(a), the parties shall bear, pro rata, all Expenses (as defined below) that they incur, such that Target pays an aggregate of fifty percent (50%) of such Expenses, and Parent pays an aggregate of fifty percent (50%) of such Expenses. In no event will Parent pay any expenses of Target shareholders.

        (b)   "Expenses" as used in this Agreement shall include all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by a party or on its behalf in connection with or related to the preparation, printing, filing and mailing of the Registration Statement, the Proxy/Prospectus, the solicitation of stockholder approvals and requisite HSR filings (subject to reasonable documentation). Expenses shall exclude all fees and expenses of outside counsel, accountants, financing sources, investment bankers, experts and consultants to any party hereto and its affiliates incurred by such party or on its behalf in connection with or related to the due diligence, authorization, preparation, negotiation, execution or performance of this Agreement.


        7.7
    Cooperation.     Subject to compliance with applicable law, from the date hereof until the Effective Time, each party shall confer on a regular and frequent basis with one (1) or more representatives of the other parties to report operational matters of materiality and the general status of ongoing operations and shall promptly provide the other party or its counsel with copies of all filings made by such party with any Governmental Authority in connection with this Agreement and the Transactions.


        7.8
    Publicity.     Neither Target, Parent nor any of their respective affiliates shall issue or cause the publication of any press release or other announcement with respect to the Transactions without the

A-53


Table of Contents

prior consent of the other party, except as may be required by law or by any listing agreement with the NYSE Amex and the AIM, and each party shall use reasonable efforts to provide copies of such release or other announcement to the other party hereto, and give due consideration to such comments as each such other party may have, prior to any release or other announcement.


        7.9
    Additional Actions.     Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, each party agrees to use commercially reasonable efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all action and to do, or cause to be done, all things necessary, proper or advisable under applicable laws and regulations, or to remove any injunctions or other impediments or delays, to consummate and make effective the Transactions, subject, however, to the Target Stockholders' Approval and the Parent Stockholders' Approval. Parent shall cause the Merger Sub to perform its covenants and agreements under this Agreement and any Ancillary Agreement to which Merger Sub is a party.


        7.10
    Filings.     Each party shall make all filings such party is required to make in connection herewith or desirable to achieve the purposes contemplated hereby, and shall cooperate as needed with respect to any such filing by any other party.


        7.11
    Consents.     Each of Parent and Target shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain all consents necessary or advisable in connection with its obligations hereunder.


        7.12
    Certain Parent Board Approvals.     Prior to the Closing Date, Parent and Target, and their respective Boards of Directors, shall adopt resolutions consistent with the interpretive guidance of the SEC and take any other actions as may be required to cause any dispositions of Target Shares (including derivative securities with respect to Target Common Shares) or acquisitions of Parent Common Shares (including derivative securities with respect to Parent Common Shares) resulting from the transactions contemplated hereby by each individual who is subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act to be exempt from Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act under Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act.


        7.13
    Parent Board of Directors.     

        (a)   Parent shall use its best efforts to cause (i) three (3) members of Target's Board of Directors to be elected as members of Parent's Board of Directors by Parent's existing Board of Directors simultaneous with Closing, subject to applicable law, which directors shall be acceptable to Parent's Board of Directors in its sole discretion (collectively, "Director Nominees"); and (ii) Richard Kelly Plato of Parent's Board of Directors to tender his letter of resignation to be effective simultaneous with the Closing. One of the Director Nominees will become a Class I Director of Parent, one of the Director Nominees will fill the vacancy created by the resignation of R. Kelly Plato as a Class II Director of Parent, and one of the Director Nominees will become a Class III Director of Parent, in each case as designated by Target. Subject to applicable law, each Director Nominee shall serve as a Class I, Class II or Class III Director for a term expiring as follows: (i) for Class I Directors, at Parent's 2012 annual meeting of stockholders, (ii) for Class II Directors, at Parent's 2010 annual meeting of stockholders and (iii) for Class III Directors, at Parent's 2011 annual meeting of stockholders, each as following the Effective Time and until his successor is duly elected and qualified. If at any time prior to the Effective Time, any Director Nominee shall be unable to serve as a director at the Effective Time, Target's Board of Directors or nominating committee shall nominate another individual who is a member of Target's Board of Directors and is reasonably acceptable to Parent to serve in such individual's place. Parent shall take such action, including amending its Certificate of Formation and/or Bylaws, as required to cause the number of directors constituting Parent's Board of Directors immediately after the Effective Time to be increased as necessary to reflect the addition of the Director Nominees.

        (b)   The composition of the committees of Parent's Board of Directors immediately following the Effective Time (including the respective chairmen thereof) shall be as designated at or immediately following the Effective Time in the sole discretion of Parent's Board of Directors, provided that during

A-54


Table of Contents


the one (1) year period following the Closing, each committee shall consist of four (4) directors, at least two (2) of whom will be directors who served on Target's Board of Directors before the Closing.


        7.14
    Stockholders' Meetings.     

        (a)   Target shall, as promptly as reasonably practicable after the date hereof (i) take all steps reasonably necessary to call, give notice of, convene and hold a special or annual meeting of its stockholders (the "Target Meeting") for the purpose of securing the Target Stockholders' Approval, (ii) distribute to its stockholders the Proxy/Prospectus in accordance with applicable federal and state law and its Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, which Proxy/Prospectus shall contain the recommendation of the Target Board of Directors that its stockholders approve this Agreement, (iii) subject to Section 7.2 and Article X, recommend approval of the Merger and this Agreement through its board of directors, (iv) subject to Section 7.2 and Article X, use commercially reasonable efforts to solicit from its stockholders proxies in favor of approval of this Agreement and to secure the Target Stockholders' Approval, and (v) cooperate and consult with Parent with respect to each of the foregoing matters.

        (b)   Parent shall, as promptly as reasonably practicable after the date hereof (i) take all steps reasonably necessary to call, give notice of, convene and hold a special or annual meeting of its stockholders (the "Parent Meeting") for the purpose of securing the Parent Stockholders' Approval, (ii) distribute to its stockholders the Proxy/Prospectus in accordance with applicable federal and state law and its Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, which Proxy/Prospectus shall contain the recommendation of the Parent Board of Directors that its stockholders approve this Agreement, (iii) subject to Section 7.3 and Article X, recommend approval of the Merger and this Agreement through its board of directors, (iv) subject to Section 7.3 and Article X, use commercially reasonable efforts to solicit from its stockholders proxies to secure the Parent Stockholders' Approval, and (v) cooperate and consult with Target with respect to each of the foregoing matters.


        7.15
    Preparation of the Proxy/Prospectus and Registration Statement.     

        (a)   Parent and Target shall promptly (i) prepare and file with the SEC a preliminary version of the Proxy/Prospectus and will use commercially reasonable efforts to respond to the comments of the SEC in connection therewith and to furnish all information required to prepare the definitive Proxy/Prospectus and (ii) prepare and publish an admission document in relation to Parent and Target (the "Readmission Document") which shall be compiled in accordance with the AIM Rules and Parent and Target shall furnish all relevant information required to publish the Readmission Document, procure the acceptance of responsibility of any director or proposed director of Parent in connection with the Readmission Document, the engagement of any competent person in accordance with the AIM Rules and the engagement of any other adviser that may be required so that Parent may be approved and re-admitted to the AIM. At any time from (and including) the initial filing with the SEC of the Proxy/Prospectus, Parent shall file with the SEC the Registration Statement containing the Proxy/Prospectus so long as Parent shall have provided to Target a copy of the Registration Statement containing the Proxy/Prospectus at least ten (10) days prior to any filing thereof and any supplement or amendment at least two (2) days prior to any filing thereof. Subject to the foregoing sentence, Parent and Target shall jointly determine the date that the Registration Statement is filed with the SEC and the date that Parent shall be re-admitted to listing on AIM. Parent and Target shall use commercially reasonable efforts (i) to have the Registration Statement declared effective under the Securities Act as promptly as practicable after such filing and (ii) use commercially reasonable efforts to achieve the intended date for re-admission to listing on AIM including instructing Parent's nominated adviser to file such necessary notices with AIM as may be required to effect Parent's listing on AIM. Parent shall also take any action (other than qualifying to do business in any jurisdiction in which it is not now so qualified or filing a general consent to service of process in any jurisdiction) required to be taken under any applicable state securities laws or AIM Rules in connection with the issuance of Parent Common

A-55


Table of Contents


Shares in the Merger and Target shall furnish all information concerning Target and the holders of shares of Target capital stock as may be reasonably requested in connection with any such action. Promptly after the effectiveness of the Registration Statement and the completion of the Readmission Document, Parent and Target shall cause the Proxy/Prospectus and the Readmission Document to be mailed to their respective stockholders, and if necessary, after the definitive Proxy/Prospectus and Readmission Document have been mailed, promptly circulate amended, supplemented or supplemental proxy materials and, if required in connection therewith, re-solicit proxies or written consents, as applicable. If at any time prior to the Effective Time, the officers and directors of Parent or Target discover any statement which, in light of the circumstances to which it is made, is false or misleading with respect to a material fact or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made in the Proxy/Prospectus or the Readmission Document not misleading, then such party shall immediately notify the other party of such misstatements or omissions. Parent shall advise Target and Target shall advise Parent, as applicable, promptly after it receives notice thereof, of the time when the Registration Statement becomes effective or any supplement or amendment has been filed, the issuance of any stop order, the suspension of the qualification of the Parent Common Shares for offering or sale in any jurisdiction, or any request by the SEC for amendment of the Proxy/Prospectus or the Registration Statement or comments thereon and responses thereto or requests by the SEC for additional information.

        (b)   Following receipt by UHY LLP ("UHY"), Parent's independent auditors, of an appropriate request from Target pursuant to SAS No. 72, Parent shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause to be delivered to Target a letter of Hein, dated a date within two (2) Business Days before the effective date of the Registration Statement and the date of the publication of the Readmission Document, and addressed to Target, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Target and customary in scope and substance for "cold comfort" and "working capital" and other required letters delivered by independent public accountants in connection with registration statements and proxy statements similar to the Proxy/Prospectus and the Readmission Document.

        (c)   Following receipt by Hein & Associates, L.L.P. ("Hein"), Target's independent auditors, of an appropriate request from Parent pursuant to SAS No. 72, Target shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause to be delivered to Parent a letter of UHY, dated a date within two (2) Business Days before the effective date of the Registration Statement and the date of the publication of the Readmission Document, and addressed to Parent, in form and substance satisfactory to Parent and customary in scope and substance for "cold comfort" and "working capital" and other required letters delivered by independent public accountants in connection with registration statements and proxy statements similar to the Proxy/Prospectus and the Readmission Document.


        7.16
    Stock Exchange Listing.     Parent shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the Parent Common Shares to be issued in the Merger and to be issued upon the exercise of options to purchase Parent Common Shares to be approved and admitted for listing on the NYSE Amex and the AIM.


        7.17
    Employee Matters.     

        (a)   Target has heretofore furnished to Parent a listing of all current employees co-employed by Target, its Subsidiaries and Administaff, Inc. or its affiliates, including each employee's (i) name, (ii) title, position or written job description, (iii) current rate of annual remuneration and any incentive compensation arrangements, commissions, or fringe or other material benefits, whether payable in cash or in kind, and accrued but unused vacation, sick, or other paid leave and the rate at which paid leave is accrued, (iv) the location where such employee generally performs services, (v) the date such employee was employed by Target or a Subsidiary of Target, (vi) status as exempt/non-exempt, (vii) initial date of hire, seniority or service credit date if different from initial date of hire, (viii) status

A-56


Table of Contents


(whether active or on leave of absence and, if on a leave, the type of leave), and (ix) bonuses for the current fiscal year and the most recently completed fiscal year (the "Target Employees").

        (b)   Parent has heretofore furnished to Target a listing of all current employees of Parent and its Subsidiaries, including each employee's (i) name, (ii) title, position or written job description, (iii) current rate of annual remuneration and any incentive compensation arrangements, commissions, or fringe or other material benefits, whether payable in cash or in kind, and accrued but unused vacation, sick, or other paid leave and the rate at which paid leave is accrued, (iv) the location where such employee generally performs services, (v) the date such employee was employed by Parent or a Subsidiary of Parent, (vi) status as exempt/non-exempt, (vii) initial date of hire, sendsiority or service credit date if different from initial date of hire, (viii) status (whether active or on leave of absence and, if on a leave, the type of leave), and (ix) bonuses for the current fiscal year and the most recently completed fiscal year (the "Parent Employees"). The Target Employees and the Parent Employees are referred to herein collectively as the "Business Employees."

        (c)   After the Effective Time, Parent shall (or shall cause the Surviving Corporation to) (i) continue in effect the Target Benefit Plans (except as provided in this Section 7.17) and the Administaff Plans as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time, and the Administaff Agreement (or a substantially similar agreement with Administaff Companies II, L.P. or its affiliate) or (ii) provide or cause to be provided substantially similar benefit plans and arrangements to those benefit plans and arrangements provided to the Business Employees immediately prior to the Effective Time either through an agreement with a professional employer organization other than Administaff Companies II, L.P. or through benefit plans and arrangements sponsored and maintained by Parent or a Subsidiary (the plans described in (i) and (ii) are referred to herein as the "Post-Closing Plans").

        (d)   For all purposes (including for purposes of vesting, eligibility, accrual of benefits and level of benefits) under the Post-Closing Plans providing benefits to any Target Employees after the Effective Time, each Target Employee shall be credited for his or her years of service with Target and its Subsidiaries and their respective predecessors before the Effective Time, to the same extent as such Target Employee was entitled, before the Effective Time, to credit for such service under any similar Target Benefit Plan or Administaff Plan; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not apply with respect to benefit accrual under any defined benefit pension plan. In addition, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Parent shall take commercially reasonable efforts to provide that (x) each Target Employee shall be immediately eligible to participate, without any waiting time, in any and all Post-Closing Plans to the extent coverage under such Post-Closing Plan is comparable to a Target Benefit Plan or Administaff Plan in which such Target Employee participated immediately before the Effective Time (such plans, collectively, the "Pre-Closing Plans") and (y) for purposes of each Post-Closing Plan providing medical, dental, pharmaceutical and/or vision benefits to any Target Employee, Parent shall cause all pre-existing condition exclusions and actively-at-work requirements of such Post-Closing Plan to be waived for such employee and his or her covered dependents, unless such conditions would not have been waived under comparable plans of Target or its Subsidiaries or the Administaff Plan in which such employee participated immediately prior to the Effective time, and Parent shall cause any eligible expenses incurred by such employee and his or her dependents during the portion of the plan year of the Pre-Closing Plans ending on the date of such employee's participation in the corresponding Post-Closing Plan begins to be taken into account under such Post-Closing Plan for purposes of satisfying all deductible, coinsurance and maximum out-of-pocket requirements applicable to such employee and his or her covered dependents for the applicable plan year as if such amounts had been paid in accordance with such Post-Closing Plan.

        (e)   Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Section 7.17(e), the parties expressly acknowledge and agree that (i) the Business Employees are not intended beneficiaries of this Agreement and this Agreement is not intended to create a contract between Parent (or any of its subsidiaries), the Surviving Corporation, Target, or any Target Subsidiary, on the one hand, and any

A-57


Table of Contents


Business Employee, on the other hand, and no Business Employee may rely on this Agreement as a basis for any breach of contract claim against Parent (or any of its subsidiaries), the Surviving Corporation, Target, or any of the Target Subsidiaries; (ii) nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed or construed to require Parent (or any of its subsidiaries), the Surviving Corporation, Target, or any of the Target Subsidiaries to continue to employ any particular Business Employee for any period after Closing; (iii) nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed or construed to limit Parent's (or any of its subsidiary's), or the Surviving Corporation's right to terminate the employment of any Business Employee during any period after Closing; (iv) nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed or construed to limit Parent's (or any of its subsidiary's), or the Surviving Corporation's right to terminate or amend any benefit plan or arrangement covering any Business Employee on or after the Closing Date or to provide any benefit other than through agreement with a professional employer organization; and (v) nothing in this Agreement shall modify or amend any Target Benefit Plan, Administaff Plan, Parent Benefit Plan or other agreement, plan, program, or document unless this Agreement explicitly states that the provision "amends" such plan or other agreement, plan, program, or document.

        (f)    Parent shall (or shall cause the Surviving Corporation to) recognize accrued but unused paid vacation, earned time off, and sick leave accrued by a Business Employee as of the Closing Date. Prior to the Closing Date, Target shall confirm in writing to Parent and Parent shall confirm in writing to Target and Parent and Target shall confirm to their respective Business Employees the amount of accrued and unpaid days of vacation, earned time off, and sick leave applicable to such Business Employees.

        (g)   Target and Parent shall cooperate with each other in all reasonable respects relating to any actions to be taken pursuant to this Section 7.17.


        7.18
    Notice of Certain Events.     Each party to this Agreement shall promptly as reasonably practicable notify the other parties of:

        (a)   any notice or other communication from any Person alleging that the consent of such Person (or other Person) is or may be required in connection with the Transactions;

        (b)   any notice or other communication from any Governmental Authority in connection with the Transactions;

        (c)   any actions, suits, claims, investigations or proceedings commenced or, to the best of its knowledge, threatened against, relating to or involving or otherwise affecting it or any of its Subsidiaries which, if pending on the date hereof, would have been required to have been disclosed pursuant to Sections 4.10, 4.12, 5.10 or 5.12, or which relate to the consummation of the Transactions;

        (d)   any notice of, or other communication relating to, a default or event that, with notice or lapse of time or both, would become a default, received by it or any of its Subsidiaries subsequent to the date hereof, under any material agreement; and

        (e)   any Target Material Adverse Effect or Parent Material Adverse Effect or the occurrence of any event which is reasonably likely to result in a Target Material Adverse Effect or a Parent Material Adverse Effect, as the case may be.


        7.19
    Site Inspections.     Target and its Subsidiaries shall deliver to Parent at least thirty (30) days prior to the Closing all environmental documents, reports, assessments and Target Permits regarding the properties owned, used or leased by Target and its Subsidiaries. Subject to compliance with applicable law, from the date hereof until the Effective Time, each party may undertake (at that party's sole cost and expense) a reasonable environmental and operational assessment or assessments (an "Assessment") of the other party's operations, business and/or properties that are the subject of this Agreement. An Assessment may include a review of permits, files and records including, but not

A-58


Table of Contents

limited to, environmental investigations, audits, assessments, studies, testing and management plans and systems, as well as visual and physical inspections and testing. An Assessment will not include any soil borings, groundwater or any other "Phase II" testing without the consent of the party whose operations, business or property is the subject of such Assessment (the "Inspected Party") (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed). Before conducting an Assessment, the party intending to conduct such Assessment (the "Inspecting Party") shall confer with the Inspected Party regarding the nature, scope and scheduling of such Assessment, and shall comply with such conditions as the Inspected Party may reasonably impose to (i) avoid interference with the Inspected Party's operations or business; (ii) require Inspecting Party's representatives responsible for performing the Assessment to maintain insurance coverage as required by the Inspected Party; (iii) keep the Inspected Party's property free and clear of any liens arising out of any entry onto or inspection of the subject property; and (iv) provide indemnification by the Inspecting Party in favor of the Inspected Party to indemnify the Inspected Party from the Inspecting Party's negligence in conducting such Assessment. The Inspected Party shall cooperate in good faith with the Inspecting Party's effort to conduct an Assessment.


        7.20
    Tax Treatment.     Each party shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the Merger to qualify, and shall not take, and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to prevent any subsidiary of such party from taking, any actions which would prevent the Merger from qualifying, as a reorganization under the provisions of Section 368(a) of the Code.


        7.21
    Stockholder Litigation.     Each of Parent and Target shall give the other the reasonable opportunity to participate in the defense of any litigation against Parent or Target, as applicable, and its directors relating to the Transactions.


        7.22
    Parent Restructure.     Not less than one (1) day prior to the Closing, Parent shall take any and all actions necessary (including filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Texas a Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Formation of Parent) to increase the authorized number of Parent Common Shares to a sufficient amount of Parent Common Shares to (i) accomplish the Transactions, (ii) fulfill contractual obligations of Parent and (iii) provide for additional issuances of capital stock of Parent as approved by its Board of Directors, which amount shall not be less than 250,000,000 shares.


ARTICLE VIII

CONDITIONS TO CONSUMMATION OF THE MERGER

        8.1    Conditions to the Obligation of Each Party.     The respective obligations of each party to effect the Merger shall be subject to the fulfillment at or prior to the Effective Time of the following conditions:

        (a)   The Target Stockholders' Approval and the Parent Stockholders' Approval must have been obtained.

        (b)   No action, suit or proceeding instituted by any Governmental Authority may be pending and no statute, rule, order, decree or regulation and no injunction, order, decree or judgment of any court or Governmental Authority of competent jurisdiction may be in effect, in each case which would prohibit, restrain, enjoin or restrict the consummation of the Transactions; provided, however, that the party seeking to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this subsection (b) must have used all reasonable best efforts to prevent the entry of such injunction or other order.

        (c)   The Registration Statement must have become effective in accordance with the provisions of the Securities Act and no stop order suspending the effectiveness of the Registration Statement may be in effect and no proceeding for such purpose may be pending before or threatened by the SEC.

A-59


Table of Contents

        (d)   Each of Target and Parent must have obtained all material permits, authorizations, consents, or approvals required to consummate the Transactions.

        (e)   The Parent Common Shares to be issued in the Merger and to be issued upon the exercise of options to purchase Parent Common Shares must have been approved and admitted for listing on the NYSE Amex.

        (f)    Any applicable waiting period under the HSR Act must have expired or been terminated.

        (g)   Prior to or simultaneous with the Effective Time, all indebtedness under Parent's credit facilities shall have been repaid or refinanced, or Parent shall have received consent under such credit facilities to enter into this Agreement.

        (h)   Prior to or simultaneous with the Effective Time, all indebtedness under Target's credit facility shall have been repaid or refinanced, or Target shall have received consent under such credit facility to enter into this Agreement.


        8.2    Conditions to the Obligations of Parent.     The obligation of Parent to effect the Merger is subject to the satisfaction at or prior to the Effective Time of the following conditions:

        (a)   Target must have performed in all material respects its obligations under this Agreement required to be performed by it at or prior to the Effective Time and the representations and warranties of Target contained in this Agreement, to the extent qualified with respect to materiality must be true and correct in all respects, and to the extent not so qualified must be true and correct in all material respects, in each case as of the date hereof and at and as of the Effective Time as if made at and as of such time, except as expressly contemplated by the Target Disclosure Schedule or this Agreement and except that the accuracy of representations and warranties that by their terms speak as of the date hereof or some other date shall be determined as of such date, and Parent must have received a certificate of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Target as to the satisfaction of this condition.

        (b)   From the date hereof through the Effective Time, there must not have occurred any change, event, circumstance, condition, development or occurrence with respect to Target or its financial condition, business or operations that would constitute a Target Material Adverse Effect.

        (c)   Target must have delivered to its counsel, Parent and Parent's counsel a certificate, signed on behalf of Target by a duly authorized officer of Target, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 8.2(c), certifying the representations necessary for counsel to Target to opine that the Merger will qualify as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code.

        (d)   Each consent, waiver and approval set forth in Sections 4.4(b) and 4.4(c) of the Target Disclosure Schedule must have been obtained, and Target must have provided Parent and Parent's counsel with copies thereof.

        (e)   Parent must have received a "cold comfort" letter from Hein in the form contemplated by Section 7.15(b).

        (f)    The aggregate number of Target Dissenting Shares shall not exceed one percent (1%) of the total number of shares of Target Common Shares issued and outstanding as of the record date for the Target Meeting and entitled to vote on the proposed Merger as such meeting.

        (g)   Target must have terminated any and all performance bonus plans.

        (h)   (i) Each of S. Jeffrey Johnson and Benjamin Daitch must have (A) resigned their positions as directors and/or officers of Target and its Subsidiaries, (B) executed and not revoked in any way separation agreements and releases with Target in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 8.2(h)(i), and (C) executed and not revoked in any way any additional documents required to be executed by them on or before Closing under the terms of such separation agreements and releases; and (ii) Parent must

A-60


Table of Contents

have received the resignations of all of the directors and officers of Target and its Subsidiaries except for such officers of the Surviving Corporation listed on Exhibit 2.3.

        (i)    Parent must have been approved and re-admitted for listing on AIM.


        8.3
    Conditions to the Obligations of Target.     The obligation of Target to effect the Merger is subject to the satisfaction at or prior to the Effective Time of the following conditions:

        (a)   Parent must have performed in all material respects its obligations under this Agreement required to be performed by it at or prior to the Effective Time and the representations and warranties of Parent contained in this Agreement, to the extent qualified with respect to materiality must be true and correct in all respects, and to the extent not so qualified must be true and correct in all material respects, in each case as of the date hereof and at and as of the Effective Time as if made at and as of such time, except as expressly contemplated by the Parent Disclosure Schedule or this Agreement and except that the accuracy of representations and warranties that by their terms speak as of the date hereof or some other date shall be determined as of such date, and Target must have received a certificate of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Parent as to the satisfaction of this condition.

        (b)   From the date hereof through the Effective Time, there must not have occurred any change, event, circumstance, condition, development or occurrence with respect to Parent or its financial condition, business or operations that would constitute a Parent Material Adverse Effect.

        (c)   Parent must have delivered to its counsel, Target and Target's counsel a certificate, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 8.3(c), signed on behalf of Parent by a duly authorized officer of Parent, certifying the representations necessary for counsel to opine that the Merger will qualify as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code.

        (d)   Target shall have received an opinion from Thompson & Knight LLP, tax counsel to Target, on the basis of representations and warranties set forth or referred to in such opinion, dated as of the Closing Date, to the effect that (i) the Merger will be treated for federal income tax purposes as a "reorganization" within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code and (ii) Target and Parent will each be a "party to the reorganization" within the meaning of Section 368 of the Code. In rendering such opinion, such counsel shall be entitled to receive and rely upon representations, warranties and covenants of officers of Parent, Merger Sub, Target or others reasonably requested by such counsel.

        (e)   Each consent, waiver and approval set forth in Sections 5.4(b) and 5.4(c) of the Parent Disclosure Schedule must have been obtained, and Parent must have provided Target and Target's counsel with copies thereof.

        (f)    Target must have received a "cold comfort" letter from UHY in the form contemplated by Section 7.15(c).

        (g)   The D&O Insurance tail coverage as described in Section 7.4(a)(iii) shall have been obtained and will be in effect upon Closing.


ARTICLE IX

SURVIVAL

        9.1    Survival of Representations and Warranties.     The representations and warranties of the parties contained in this Agreement shall not survive the Effective Time.


        9.2
    Survival of Covenants and Agreements.     The covenants and agreements of the parties to be performed after the Effective Time contained in this Agreement shall survive the Effective Time.

A-61


Table of Contents


ARTICLE X

TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER

        10.1    Termination.     This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after approval by the stockholders of Target or Parent:

        (a)   by the mutual written consent of Parent and Target;

        (b)   by either Parent or Target if the Effective Time has not occurred on or before February 28, 2010 (the "Termination Date"), provided that the party seeking to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 10.1(b) shall not have breached in any material respect its obligations under this Agreement in any manner that shall have proximately contributed to the failure to consummate the Merger on or before the Termination Date;

        (c)   by Target, if there has been a material breach by Parent of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement set forth in this Agreement which breach (if susceptible to cure) has not been cured in all material respects within twenty (20) Business Days following receipt by Parent of written notice of such breach (a "Parent Breach");

        (d)   by Parent, if there has been a material breach by Target of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement set forth in this Agreement which breach (if susceptible to cure) has not been cured in all material respects within twenty (20) Business Days following receipt by Target of written notice of such breach (a "Target Breach");

        (e)   by either Target or Parent, if any applicable law, rule or regulation that makes consummation of the Merger illegal is extant or if any judgment, injunction, order or decree of a court or other Governmental Authority of competent jurisdiction restrains or prohibits the consummation of the Merger, and such judgment, injunction, order or decree becomes final and nonappealable;

        (f)    by either Target or Parent, if either the Target Stockholders' Approval or the Parent Stockholders' Approval is not obtained upon a vote at a duly held meeting of stockholders or at any adjournment or postponement thereof; provided that the party seeking to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 10.1(b) shall not have breached in any material respect its obligations under this Agreement, including but not limited to Section 7.14, in any manner that shall have contributed to the failure to receive the Target Stockholders' Approval and/or the Parent Stockholders' Approval;

        (g)   by Parent, if (i) Target's Board of Directors shall have made a Target Adverse Recommendation Change or resolves to do the foregoing, Target's Board of Directors shall have made a Target Acquisition Proposal Recommendation or resolves to do so, Target accepts a Target Acquisition Proposal or Target executes a Target Acquisition Agreement; (ii) a tender offer or exchange offer for outstanding shares of Target's capital stock then representing thirty percent (30%) or more of the combined power to vote generally for the election of directors is commenced and Target's Board of Directors does not, within the applicable period required by law, recommend that stockholders not tender their shares into such tender or exchange offer; or (iii) Target shall have breached any of its obligations under or restrictions of Section 7.2;

        (h)   by Target, if Target accepts a Target Superior Proposal; provided, however, that Target may not terminate this Agreement under this Section 10.1(h) unless (i) it pays the Target Termination Fee to Parent no later than one (1) Business Day after termination of this Agreement; and (ii) it has used commercially reasonable efforts to provide Parent with five (5) Business Days prior written notice of its intent to so terminate this Agreement together with a detailed summary of the terms and conditions of such Target Superior Proposal; provided further, that prior to any such termination, Target shall, and shall direct its respective financial and legal advisors to, negotiate in good faith with Parent to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of this Agreement as would result, in the opinion of Target's Board of Directors, after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal counsel, in a

A-62


Table of Contents


revised Parent proposal that is reasonably capable of being completed, and, if consummated, may reasonably be expected to result in a transaction that is at least as favorable from a financial point of view to the holders of Target Common Shares as the Target Superior Proposal; and provided that a Target Superior Proposal accepted by Target shall not be subject to any financing contingencies;

        (i)    by Target, if (i) Parent's Board of Directors shall have made a Parent Adverse Recommendation Change or resolves to do the foregoing, Parent's Board of Directors shall have made a Parent Acquisition Proposal Recommendation or resolves to do so, Parent accepts a Parent Acquisition Proposal or Parent executes a Parent Acquisition Agreement; (ii) a tender offer or exchange offer for outstanding shares of Parent's capital stock then representing thirty percent (30%) or more of the combined power to vote generally for the election of directors is commenced, and Parent's Board of Directors does not, within the applicable period required by law, recommend that stockholders not tender their shares into such tender or exchange offer; or (iii) Parent shall have breached any of its obligations under or restrictions of Section 7.3;

        (j)    by Parent, if Parent accepts a Parent Superior Proposal; provided, however, that Parent may not terminate this Agreement under this Section 10.1(j) unless (i) it pays the Parent Termination Fee to Target no later than one (1) Business Day after termination of this Agreement; and (ii) it has used commercially reasonable efforts to provide Target with five (5) Business Days prior written notice of its intent to so terminate this Agreement together with a detailed summary of the terms and conditions of such Parent Superior Proposal; provided further, that prior to any such termination, Parent shall, and shall direct its respective financial and legal advisors to, negotiate in good faith with Target to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of this Agreement as would result, in the opinion of Parent's Board of Directors, after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal counsel, in a revised Target proposal that is reasonably capable of being completed, and, if consummated, may reasonably be expected to result in a transaction that is at least as favorable from a financial point of view to the holders of Parent Common Shares as the Parent Superior Proposal; and provided that a Parent Superior Proposal accepted by Parent shall not be subject to any financing contingencies;

        (k)   by Parent, if Target accepts a Target Superior Proposal;

        (l)    by Target, if Parent accepts a Parent Superior Proposal;

        (m)  by Target or Parent, at any time during the period starting on October 15, 2009 through and including October 31, 2009, if the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series D Stock have not approved the Series D CD Amendment in a form and substance satisfactory to Parent and Target, which approval of Parent and Target shall not be unreasonably withheld;

        (n)   by Parent if, in the good faith determination of Parent's Board of Directors, it becomes reasonably apparent that (i) all indebtedness under Parent's credit facilities will not be repaid or refinanced prior to or at Closing or Parent will not receive consent under such credit facilities to enter into this Agreement; or (ii) all indebtedness under Target's credit facilities will not be repaid or refinanced prior to or at Closing or Target will not receive consent under such credit facilities to enter into this Agreement (other than through the failure of Parent to comply with its obligations under this Agreement); or

        (o)   by Target if, in the good faith determination of Target's Board of Directors, it becomes reasonably apparent that (i) all indebtedness under Parent's credit facilities will not be repaid or refinanced prior to or at Closing or Parent will not receive consent under such credit facilities to enter into this Agreement; or (ii) all indebtedness under Target's credit facilities will not be repaid or refinanced prior to or at Closing or Target will not receive consent under such credit facilities to enter into this Agreement (other than through the failure of Target to comply with its obligations under this Agreement).

A-63


Table of Contents


        10.2
    Effect of Termination.     

        (a)   If this Agreement is terminated and the Merger is abandoned under this Article X, all obligations of the parties shall terminate, except the parties' obligations pursuant to this Article X and except for Sections 7.6, 7.8, Article XI and the last two (2) sentences of Section 7.1; provided however, that nothing herein shall relieve any party from liability for any breaches hereof.

        (b)   In the event the termination of this Agreement results from the willful and material breach of any agreement or covenant herein, then Parent or Target, as the case may be, shall be entitled to all remedies available at law or in equity and shall be entitled to recover court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled. However, no party hereto shall be entitled to recover from another party or its affiliates any indirect, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages or damages for lost profits of any kind arising under or in connection with this Agreement or the Transactions contemplated hereby. Each party on its own behalf and on behalf of its affiliates waives any right to recover punitive, special, exemplary and consequential damages, including damages for lost profits, arising in connection with or with respect to this Agreement or the Transactions contemplated hereby.


        10.3
    Termination Fees.     

        (a)   Termination by Parent.

A-64


Table of Contents

        (b)   Termination by Target.

A-65


Table of Contents

        (c)   The parties acknowledge and agree that the agreements contained in this Section 10.3 are an integral part of the Transactions, and that, without these agreements, the parties would not enter into this Agreement. Each of the parties hereto further acknowledges that neither the payment of the amounts by Parent specified in Section 10.3 nor the payment of the amounts by Target specified in Section 10.3 is a penalty, but in each case is liquidated damages in a reasonable amount that will compensate Target or Parent, as the case may be, in the circumstances in which such fees are payable and that do not involve a willful and material breach as described in Section 10.2 for the efforts and resources expended and the opportunities foregone while negotiating this Agreement and in reliance on this Agreement and on the expectation of the consummation of the Transactions, which amount would otherwise be impossible to calculate with precision. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, the parties agree that the monetary remedies set forth in this Section 10.3 and the specific performance remedies set forth in Section 11.14 shall be the sole and exclusive remedies of (A) Target and its Subsidiaries against Parent and Merger Sub and any of their respective former, current or future general or limited partners, stockholders, managers, employees, representatives, members, directors, officers, Affiliates or agents for any loss suffered as a result of the failure of the Merger to be consummated except, with respect to Parent and Merger Sub only, in the case of a willful and material breach as described in Section 10.2, and upon payment of such amount, none of Parent or Merger Sub or any of their respective former, current or future general or limited partners, stockholders, managers, employees, representatives, members, directors, officers, Affiliates or agents shall have any further liability or obligation relating to or arising out of this Agreement or the Transactions except, with respect to Parent and Merger Sub only, in the case of a willful and material breach as described in Section 10.2; and (B) Parent and Merger Sub against Target and its Subsidiaries and any of their respective former, current or future general or limited partners, stockholders, managers, employees, representatives, members, directors, officers, Affiliates or agents for any loss suffered as a result of the failure of the Merger to be consummated except, with respect to Target and its Subsidiaries only, in the case of a willful and material breach as described in Section 10.2, and upon payment of such amount, none of Target and its Subsidiaries or any of their respective former, current or future general or limited partners, stockholders, managers, employees, representatives, members, directors, officers, Affiliates or agents shall have any further liability or obligation relating to or arising out of this Agreement or the Transactions except, with respect to Target and its Subsidiaries only, a willful and material breach as described in Section 10.2.


ARTICLE XI

MISCELLANEOUS

        11.1    Notices.     All notices or communications hereunder shall be in writing (including facsimile or similar writing) addressed as follows:

        To Parent or Merger Sub:

A-66


Table of Contents

        With a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:

        To Target:

        With a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:

Any such notice or communication shall be deemed given (i) when made, if made by hand delivery, and upon confirmation of receipt, if made by facsimile, (ii) one (1) Business Day after being deposited with a next-day courier, postage prepaid, or (iii) three (3) Business Days after being sent certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, in each case addressed as above (or to such other address as such party may designate in writing from time to time).


        11.2
    Severability.     If any provision of this Agreement shall be declared to be invalid or unenforceable, in whole or in part, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the remaining provisions hereof which shall remain in full force and effect.


        11.3
    Assignment.     This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns; provided, however, that neither this Agreement nor any rights hereunder shall be assignable or otherwise subject to hypothecation and any assignment in violation hereof shall be null and void.


        11.4
    Interpretation.     The headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.


        11.5
    Counterparts.     This Agreement may be executed in one (1) or more counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and the same Agreement, and shall become effective when one (1) or more such counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and delivered to each party.


        11.6
    Entire Agreement.     This Agreement, all documents contemplated herein or required hereby, and the Confidentiality Agreement represents the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and shall supersede any and all previous contracts, arrangements or understandings between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof.

A-67


Table of Contents


        11.7
    Governing Law.     This Agreement shall be construed, interpreted, and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without reference to rules relating to conflicts of law.


        11.8
    Submission to Jurisdiction.     Each party to this Agreement submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of Texas in any dispute or action arising out of or relating to this Agreement and agrees that all claims in respect of such dispute or action may be heard and determined in any such court. Each party also agrees not to bring any dispute or action arising out of or relating to this Agreement in any other court. Each party agrees that a final judgment in any dispute or action so brought will be conclusive and may be enforced by dispute or action on the judgment or in any other manner provided at law (common, statutory or other) or in equity. Each party waives any defense of inconvenient forum to the maintenance of any dispute or action so brought and waives any bond, surety, or other security that might be required of any other party with respect thereto.


        11.9
    Attorneys' Fees.     If any action at law or equity, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses from the other party, which fees and expenses shall be in addition to any other relief which may be awarded.


        11.10
    No Third Party Beneficiaries.     Except as provided in Section 7.4, no Person other than the parties is an intended beneficiary of this Agreement or any portion hereof.


        11.11
    Disclosure Schedules.     The disclosures made on any disclosure schedule, including the Target Disclosure Schedule and the Parent Disclosure Schedule, with respect to any representation or warranty shall be deemed to be made with respect to any other representation or warranty requiring the same or similar disclosure to the extent that the relevance of such disclosure to other representations and warranties is reasonably evident from the face of the disclosure schedule. The inclusion of any matter on any disclosure schedule will not be deemed an admission by any party that such listed matter is material or that such listed matter has or would have a Target Material Adverse Effect or a Parent Material Adverse Effect, as applicable.


        11.12
    Amendments and Supplements.     At any time before or after approval of the matters presented in connection with the Merger by the respective stockholders of Parent and Target and prior to the Effective Time, this Agreement may be amended or supplemented in writing by Parent and Target with respect to any of the terms contained in this Agreement, except as otherwise provided by law; provided, however, that following approval of this Agreement by the stockholders of Parent, or Target, as applicable, there shall be no amendment or change to the provisions hereof unless permitted by the DGCL without further approval by the stockholders of Parent, or Target, as applicable.


        11.13
    Extensions, Waivers, Etc.     At any time prior to the Effective Time, either party may (a) extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or acts of the other party;

        (b)   waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties of the other party contained herein or in any document delivered pursuant hereto; or

        (c)   subject to the proviso of Section 11.12, waive compliance with any of the agreements or conditions of the other party contained herein.

        Notwithstanding the foregoing, no failure or delay by Parent or Target in exercising any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof nor shall any single or partial exercise thereof preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right hereunder. Any agreement on the part of a party hereto to any such extension or waiver shall be valid only if set forth in an instrument in writing signed on behalf of such party.


        11.14
    Specific Performance.     The parties hereto agree that irreparable damage would occur in the event that any provision of this Agreement was not performed in accordance with its specific terms or

A-68


Table of Contents

was otherwise breached. It is accordingly agreed that the parties shall be entitled to an injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions hereof, this being in addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled at law or in equity. No party shall object to the other parties' right to specific performance as a remedy for breach of this Agreement.


[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

A-69


Table of Contents

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

    RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ DENNIS HAMMOND

Dennis Hammond
President

    RESACA ACQUISITION SUB, INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ CHRIS WORK

Chris Work
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

    CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ S. JEFFREY JOHNSON

S. Jeffrey Johnson
Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

A-70


Table of Contents

AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER

        THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (this "Amendment") is made and entered into this 24th day of February, 2010, by and between Resaca Exploitation, Inc., a Texas corporation ("Parent"), Resaca Acquisition Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent ("Merger Sub"), and Cano Petroleum, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Target").


W I T N E S S E T H :

        WHEREAS, Parent, Merger Sub and Target are parties to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger dated September 29, 2009 (the "Original Agreement");

        WHEREAS, Parent and Target desire to amend the Original Agreement to extend the Termination Date to April 30, 2010; and

        WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 11.12 of the Original Agreement, the Original Agreement may be amended if made in writing by Parent and Target.

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


        Section 1.
    Certain Definitions.     Terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth in the Original Agreement. All references to the "Agreement" in the Original Agreement shall be deemed to refer to the Original Agreement, as amended by this Amendment.


        Section 2.
    Amendment and Restatement of Section 10.1(b).     Section 10.1(b) of the Original Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read as follows:


        Section 3.
    Ratification of the Original Agreement.     The Original Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects and shall remain in full force and effect.


        Section 4.
    Counterparts.     This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute the same instrument.

A-71


Table of Contents

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.

    RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ DENNIS HAMMOND

    Name:   Dennis Hammond
    Title:   President

 

 

RESACA ACQUISITION SUB, INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ DENNIS HAMMOND

    Name:   Dennis Hammond
    Title:   President

 

 

CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ S. JEFFREY JOHNSON

    Name:   S. Jeffrey Johnson
    Title:   Chief Executive Officer

A-72


Table of Contents


AMENDMENT NO. 2

TO

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER

        THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (this "Amendment") is made and entered into this 1st day of April, 2010, by and between Resaca Exploitation, Inc., a Texas corporation ("Parent"), Resaca Acquisition Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent ("Merger Sub"), and Cano Petroleum, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Target").


W I T N E S S E T H :

        WHEREAS, Parent, Merger Sub and Target are parties to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger dated September 29, 2009 and that certain Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger dated February 24, 2010 (as amended, the "Merger Agreement");

        WHEREAS, Parent and Target desire to further amend the Merger Agreement to extend the Termination Date to May 31, 2010 and to amend Exhibit 5.2 to the Merger Agreement;

        WHEREAS, Parent and Target desire to further amend the Merger Agreement to change certain requirements of Board committees; and

        WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 11.12 of the Merger Agreement, the Merger Agreement may be amended if made in writing by Parent and Target.

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


        Section 1.
    Certain Definitions.     Terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth in the Merger Agreement. All references to the "Agreement" in the Merger Agreement shall be deemed to refer to the Merger Agreement, as amended by this Amendment.


        Section 2.
    Amendment and Restatement of Section 10.1(b).     Section 10.1(b) of the Merger Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


        Section 3.
    Amendment and Restatement of Section Exhibit 5.2.     Exhibit 5.2 to the Merger Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read as set forth on Exhibit A hereto.


        Section 4.
    Amendment and Restatement of Section 7.13(b).     Section 7.13(b) of the Merger Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


        Section 5.
    Ratification of the Merger Agreement.     The Merger Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects and shall remain in full force and effect.

A-73


Table of Contents


        Section 6.
    Counterparts.     This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute the same instrument.


*****

[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]
[Signature Page to Follow]

A-74


Table of Contents

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment No. 2 as of the day and year first above written.

    RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ CHRIS WORK

    Name:   Chris Work

    Title:   VP and CFO


 

 

RESACA ACQUISITION SUB, INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ CHRIS WORK

    Name:   Chris Work

    Title:   VP and CFO


 

 

CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ BEN DAITCH

    Name:   Ben Daitch

    Title:   SVP and CFO

A-75


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT A

CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES
AND RIGHTS OF SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
OF
RESACA

        See Exhibit 4.4 of the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Resaca Exploitation, Inc. filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, of which this proxy statement/prospectus is a part.

A-76


Table of Contents

AMENDMENT NO. 3
TO
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER

        THIS AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (this "Amendment") is made and entered into this 28th day of April, 2010 by and between Resaca Exploitation, Inc., a Texas corporation ("Parent"), Resaca Acquisition Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent ("Merger Sub"), and Cano Petroleum, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Target").


W I T N E S S E T H :

        WHEREAS, Parent, Merger Sub and Target are parties to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger dated September 29, 2009, that certain Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger dated February 24, 2010, and that certain Amendment No. 2 to Agreement and Plan of Merger dated April 1, 2010 (as amended, the "Merger Agreement");

        WHEREAS, Parent and Target desire to further amend the Merger Agreement to extend the Termination Date to June 30, 2010; and

        WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 11.12 of the Merger Agreement, the Merger Agreement may be amended if made in writing by Parent and Target.

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


        Section 1.
    Certain Definitions.     Terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth in the Merger Agreement. All references to the "Agreement" in the Merger Agreement shall be deemed to refer to the Merger Agreement, as amended by this Amendment.


        Section 2.
    Amendment and Restatement of Section 10.1(b).     Section 10.1(b) of the Merger Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


        Section 3.
    Ratification of the Merger Agreement.     The Merger Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects and shall remain in full force and effect.


        Section 4.
    Counterparts.     This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute the same instrument.


* * * * *

[
Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]
[
Signature Page Follows]

A-77


Table of Contents

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.

    RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ JOHN LENDRUM III

    Name:   John J. Lendrum III

    Title:   Chief Executive Officer


 

 

RESACA ACQUISITION SUB, INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ JOHN LENDRUM III

    Name:   John J. Lendrum III

    Title:   Chief Executive Officer


 

 

CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ PHILLIP B. FEINER

    Name:   Phillip B. Feiner

    Title:   Vice President and General Counsel

A-78


Table of Contents


AMENDMENT NO. 4

TO

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER

        THIS AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (this "Amendment") is made and entered into this 19th day of May, 2010 by and among Resaca Exploitation, Inc., a Texas corporation ("Parent"), Resaca Acquisition Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent ("Merger Sub"), and Cano Petroleum, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Target").

W I T N E S S E T H :

        WHEREAS, Parent, Merger Sub and Target are parties to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger dated September 29, 2009, that certain Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger dated February 24, 2010, that certain Amendment No. 2 to Agreement and Plan of Merger dated April 1, 2010 and that certain Amendment No. 3 to Agreement and Plan of Merger dated April 28, 2010 (as amended, the "Merger Agreement");

        WHEREAS, Parent and Target desire to further amend the Merger Agreement to modify the method pursuant to which Parent and Target solicit proxies relating to obtaining the necessary approvals of the agenda items to be voted upon at the Target Meeting and the Parent Meeting; and

        WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 11.12 of the Merger Agreement, the Merger Agreement may be amended if made in writing by Parent and Target.

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

        Section 1. Certain Definitions. Terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Merger Agreement. All references to the "Agreement" in the Merger Agreement shall be deemed to refer to the Merger Agreement, as amended by this Amendment.

        Section 2. Amendment and Restatement of Section 4.20. Section 4.20 of the Merger Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

A-79


Table of Contents


        Section 3.
    Amendment and Restatement of Section 5.20.     Section 5.20 of the Merger Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


        Section 4.
    Amendment and Restatement of Section 7.6(b).     Section 7.6(b) of the Merger Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


        Section 5.
    Amendment and Restatement of Section 7.14(b).     Section 7.14(b) of the Merger Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


        Section 6.
    Amendment and Restatement of Section 7.15(a).     Section 7.15(a) of the Merger Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

A-80


Table of Contents


        Section 7.
    Ratification of the Merger Agreement.     The Merger Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects and shall remain in full force and effect.


        Section 8.
    Counterparts.     This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute the same instrument.

*****
[
Signature Page Follows]

A-81


Table of Contents

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.

    RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ CHRIS WORK

    Name:   Chris Work

    Title:   VP and CFO


 

 

RESACA ACQUISITION SUB, INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ CHRIS WORK

    Name:   Chris Work

    Title:   VP and CFO


 

 

CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ BEN DAITCH

    Name:   Ben Daitch

    Title:   SVP and CFO

A-82


Table of Contents


Annex B

GRAPHIC

September 29, 2009

The Board of Directors
Cano Petroleum, Inc.
Burnett Plaza
801 Cherry Street, Suite 3200
Fort Worth, Texas 76102

Members of the Board:

        You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the "Target Common Stock"), of Cano Petroleum, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Target" or the "Company"), of the Exchange Ratio (as defined below) provided for under the terms of the proposed Agreement and Plan of Merger, to be dated on or about the date hereof (the "Agreement"), by and among Resaca Exploitation, Inc., a Texas corporation ("Parent"), Resaca Acquisition Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent ("Merger Sub"), and the Company.

        We understand that the Agreement provides that Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company (the "Merger"), with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation in the Merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent, and, at the effective time of the Merger (the "Effective Time"), each share of Target Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than (A) any share of Target Common Stock held by the Company as treasury shares, and (B) any share of Target Common Stock held by any holder of Target Common Stock who does not vote in favor of the Merger (or consent thereto in writing) and who is entitled to demand and properly demands a judicial appraisal of the fair value of such holder's shares pursuant to, and who complies in all respects with, the provisions of Section 262 of General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (any such shares, "Dissenting Shares" and the shares contemplated by clause (A) or clause (B) collectively, the "Excluded Shares")) will be converted into the right to receive 2.100 (the "Exchange Ratio") validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Parent ("Parent Common Stock"). The Agreement also provides that each share of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, no par value, of the Company (the "Target Preferred Stock") issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than any share of Target Preferred Stock held by any holder of Target Preferred Stock who does not vote in favor of the Merger (or consent thereto in writing) and who is entitled to demand and properly demands a judicial appraisal of the fair value of such holder's shares pursuant to, and who complies in all respects with, the provisions of Section 262 of General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware) will be converted into the right to receive one validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Parent ("Parent Preferred Stock"). The terms and conditions of the Merger are more fully set forth in the Agreement.

        RBC Capital Markets Corporation ("RBC"), as part of its investment banking services, is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, corporate restructurings, underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements, and valuations for corporate and other purposes.

B-1


Table of Contents

        We are acting as a financial advisor to the Company in connection with the Merger and we will receive a fee for our services upon delivery of this opinion, which is not contingent upon the successful completion of the Merger. In addition, for our services as financial advisor to the Company in connection with the Merger, if the Merger is successfully completed we will receive an additional larger fee, against which the fee we received for delivery of this opinion will be credited. In addition, if, in connection with the Merger not being completed, the Company receives a termination fee, we will be entitled to a specified percentage of that fee in cash, when it is received by the Company. In addition, the Company has agreed to pay us an exchange fee equal to a specified percentage of the gross face amount of any securities extinguished in an exchange of certain securities of the Company for new securities, including in connection with the Merger, half of which exchange fee shall be credited against the fee payable if the Merger is successfully completed. The Company has also agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities that may arise out of our engagement and to reimburse us for our reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with our services.

        In the ordinary course of business, RBC or one or more of its affiliates may act as a market maker and broker in the publicly traded securities of Parent and/or the Company and receive customary compensation and may also actively trade securities of Parent and/or the Company for our or its own account and the accounts of our or its customers, and, accordingly, RBC and its affiliates, may hold a long or short position in such securities. In addition, RBC and/or one or more of its affiliates have in the past provided investment banking services to each of the Company and Parent, for which we have received customary fees. In particular, in December 2008, RBC was retained by the Company as a financial advisor to advise the Board of Directors of the Company on various strategic matters not specifically related to Parent. In July 2008, RBC or one or more of its affiliates represented Parent as the joint broker and in other related capacities for the initial public offering and admittance for trading to the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange of shares of Parent Common Stock, and RBC or one or more of its affiliates has continued to serve as a joint broker for Parent since the initial public offering. In October 2008, RBC or one or more of its affiliates represented Parent as a financial advisor in connection with Parent's consideration of a possible acquisition transaction and a related equity offering in connection with the acquisition transaction. Neither the acquisition transaction nor the offering was consummated.

        In light of RBC's prior services to the Company and Parent, RBC anticipates that it may be selected by the Company and/or Parent to provide investment banking and financial advisory and/or financing services that may be required by the Company and/or Parent in the future, regardless of whether the Merger is successfully completed, for which RBC would expect to receive customary fees.

        For the purposes of rendering our opinion, we have undertaken such review and inquiries as we deemed necessary or appropriate under the circumstances, including the following: (i) we reviewed the financial terms of the latest draft of the Agreement provided to us on September 29, 2009 (the "Latest Draft Agreement"); (ii) we reviewed and analyzed certain publicly available financial and other data with respect to the Company and Parent and certain other relevant historical operating data relating to the Company and Parent made available to us from published sources and from the internal records of the Company and Parent, respectively; (iii) we reviewed financial projections and forecasts of the Company prepared by the Company's management and financial projections and forecasts of Parent, including the combined post-Merger company after giving effect to certain potential benefits of the Merger expected to be realized from the Merger, prepared by Parent's management (collectively, the "Forecasts"); (iv) we conducted discussions with members of the senior managements of the Company and Parent with respect to the business prospects and financial outlook of the Company and Parent as standalone entities as well as the strategic rationale and potential benefits of the Merger; (v) we reviewed the reported prices and trading activity for Target Common Stock and Parent Common Stock; and (vi) we performed other studies and analyses as we deemed appropriate.

B-2


Table of Contents

        In arriving at our opinion, we performed the following analyses in addition to the review, inquiries, and analyses referred to in the preceding paragraph: (i) we performed a valuation analysis of the Company as a standalone entity, using trading price, comparable company, precedent transaction and net asset value with respect to the Company; (ii) we performed a valuation analysis of Parent as a standalone entity, using trading price, comparable company and net asset value with respect to Parent; (iii) we performed a relative valuation analysis of the Company as a standalone entity relative to the most recent trading price of Parent Common Stock as a standalone entity as of September 28, 2009, using comparable company, precedent transaction and net asset value with respect to the Company; (iv) we performed a historical exchange ratio analysis of Target Common Stock relative to Parent Common Stock, using historical trading price; (v) we performed a relative contribution analysis; and (vi) we reviewed the pro forma transaction impact of each of Parent and the Company on the pro forma company after the Merger.

        Several analytical methodologies have been employed and no one method of analysis should be regarded as critical to the overall conclusion we have reached. Each analytical technique has inherent strengths and weaknesses, and the nature of the available information may further affect the value of particular techniques. The overall conclusions we have reached are based on all the analysis and factors presented, taken as a whole, and also on application of our own experience and judgment. Such conclusions may involve significant elements of subjective judgment and qualitative analysis. We therefore give no opinion as to the value or merit standing alone of any one or more parts of the analyses.

        In rendering our opinion, we have assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all the information that was reviewed by us, including all of the financial, legal, tax, operating and other information provided to or discussed with us by or on behalf of the Company or Parent (including, without limitation, the financial statements and related notes thereto of each of the Company and Parent), and we have not assumed responsibility for independently verifying, and have not independently verified, such information. We have assumed that all Forecasts prepared by or on behalf of the Company or Parent, as the case may be (including Forecasts prepared Parent with respect to certain potential benefits of the Merger expected to be realized from the Merger and the timing of their occurrence), were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and good faith judgments of the future financial performance of the Company or Parent (as the case may be), respectively, as standalone entities (or, in the case of the benefits of the Merger, as a combined company). We express no opinion as to any such Forecasts or the assumptions upon which they were based. Without limiting the foregoing, we have also assumed that the Parent Preferred Stock will remain outstanding from and after the Effective Time on the same terms and conditions as those of the Target Preferred Stock as of the date hereof.

        In rendering our opinion, we have not assumed any responsibility to perform, and have not performed, an independent evaluation or appraisal of any of the assets or liabilities of the Company or Parent, and we have not been furnished with any such valuations or appraisals (except that a reserve report of the Company's reserves and a reserve report of Parent's reserves, each as of June 30, 2009, were provided to Parent and the Company, respectively, and us as part of the Merger due diligence process). We have not assumed any obligation to conduct, and have not conducted, any physical inspection of the property or facilities of the Company or Parent. We have not investigated, and make no assumption regarding, any litigation or other claims affecting the Company or Parent.

        In rendering our opinion, we have also assumed that the Merger will be consummated in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, without waiver, modification or amendment of any material term, condition or agreement and that, in the course of obtaining the necessary regulatory or third party approvals, consents and releases for the Merger, no delay, limitation, restriction or condition will be imposed that would have an adverse effect on the Company or Parent or the contemplated benefits of the Merger. We have further assumed that all representations and warranties set forth in

B-3


Table of Contents


the Agreement are and will be true and correct as of the date or the dates made or deemed made and that all parties to the Agreement will comply with all covenants of such party thereunder. We have further assumed that the executed version of the Agreement will not differ, in any respect material to our opinion, from the Latest Draft Agreement.

        We note that the Agreement also provides, among other things, that (i) each of the holders of any restricted shares of Target Common Stock shall execute an Orderly Market Deed (as such term is defined in the Agreement), which Orderly Market Deed shall, among other things, restrict the right of such holder to sell shares of Parent Common Stock received in the Merger; and (ii) certain directors of the Company shall be elected as members of the Board of Directors of Parent as of the closing of the Merger. In rendering our opinion, we have not given any special consideration to any of the factors noted in the immediately preceding sentence. In addition, in rendering our opinion, we have not considered any effects of any Excluded Shares or any shares of Target Common Stock held by Parent or any of its affiliates, if any.

        Our opinion speaks only as of the date hereof, is based on the conditions as they exist and information which we have been supplied as of the date hereof, and is without regard to any market, economic, financial, legal, or other circumstances or event of any kind or nature which may exist or occur after such date. We have not undertaken to reaffirm or revise this opinion or otherwise comment upon events occurring after the date hereof and do not undertake any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm this opinion. We are not expressing any opinion herein as to the prices at which Target Common Stock or Parent Common Stock have traded or will trade at any time, including following the announcement or consummation of the Merger, regardless of whether or not the Merger is consummated.

        The opinion expressed herein is provided for the information and assistance of the Board of Directors of the Company in connection with its consideration of the Merger. We express no opinion and make no recommendation to any stockholder of the Company or Parent or any other person as to how such stockholder or other person should vote or act with respect to any matter related to the Merger. All advice and opinions (written and oral) rendered by RBC are intended for the use and benefit of the Board of Directors of the Company, and they may not be used for any other purpose without the prior written consent of RBC except as required by law. Such advice or opinions may not be reproduced, summarized, excerpted from or referred to in any public document or given to any other person without the prior written consent of RBC. If required by applicable law, this opinion may be included in any disclosure document filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the Merger; provided however, that such opinion must be reproduced in full and that any description of or reference to RBC or this opinion must be in a form acceptable to RBC and its counsel. RBC shall have no responsibility for the form or content of any such disclosure document, other than the opinion itself.

        Our opinion does not address the underlying business decision by the Company to engage in the Merger or any other transaction related thereto or the relative merits of the Merger compared to any alternative business strategy or transaction in which the Company might engage. In arriving at our opinion, we were not authorized to solicit, and did not solicit, interest from any party with respect to a merger or other business combination transaction involving the Company or any of its assets.

        Our opinion addresses solely the fairness of the Exchange Ratio, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Target Common Stock. Our opinion does not in any way address other terms or conditions of the Merger or the Agreement, including, without limitation, the financial or other terms of any other agreement contemplated by, or to be entered into in connection with, the Agreement, nor does it address, and we express no opinion with respect to, the solvency of the Company or Parent or the impact thereon of the Merger. We do not express any opinion as to any tax or other consequences that might result from the Merger, nor does our opinion address any legal, tax, regulatory or

B-4


Table of Contents


accounting matters, as to which we understand that the Company has obtained such advice as it deemed necessary from qualified professionals. Further, in rendering our opinion, we express no opinion about the fairness of the amount or nature of the compensation (if any) to any of the officers, directors or employees of any party of the Merger, or class of such persons, relative to the Exchange Ratio or otherwise.

        Our opinion has been approved by RBC's Fairness Opinion Committee.

        Based on our experience as investment bankers and subject to the foregoing, including the various assumptions and limitations set forth herein, it is our opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Exchange Ratio is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Target Common Stock.

    Very truly yours,

 

 

/s/ RBC Capital Markets Corporation

 

 

RBC CAPITAL MARKETS CORPORATION

B-5


Table of Contents


Annex C


CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
TO THE
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
OF
RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC.

        Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.053 of the Texas Business Organizations Code, the undersigned Corporation (the "TBOC") adopts the following Certificate of Amendment to its Certificate of Formation:

ARTICLE ONE

        The name of the Corporation is Resaca Exploitation, Inc.

ARTICLE TWO

        The Certificate of Formation is amended by adding a new subsection, subsection (d), to Article IV:

C-1


Table of Contents

ARTICLE THREE

        This Certificate of Amendment has been duly authorized, approved and adopted by a majority of the Corporation's shareholders who voted, affirmatively or negatively, at the annual meeting of shareholders on April 29, 2010 and by unanimous written consent of the Corporation's Board of Directors on April 1, 2010.

ARTICLE FOUR

        This Certificate of Amendment has been approved in the manner required by the TBOC and by the constituent documents of the Corporation and shall become effective at the Amendment Effective Time.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused these Certificate of Amendment to be signed as of the        day of                        , 2010.


 

 

 

 

 
    RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC.

 

 

 

 

 
    By:    
       

John J. Lendrum, III
Chief Executive Officer

C-2


Table of Contents


ANNEX D


CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
TO
CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES
AND RIGHTS OF SERIES D CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
OF
CANO PETROLEUM, INC.



        Cano Petroleum, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY as follows:

        FIRST: That the Board of Directors of the Company, at a duly convened meeting on September 29, 2009, duly adopted resolutions approving and adopting the amendments set forth below to the Certificate of Designations of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company (the "Certificate of Designations"), and that such amendments have been approved and adopted by the requisite number of existing holders of the Common Stock and the Series D Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company.

        SECOND: That the amendments set forth below have been duly adopted in accordance with the applicable provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

        THIRD: That the Certificate of Designations is hereby amended as follows:

D-1


Table of Contents

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be signed by S. Jeffrey Johnson, its Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, as of the             day of                                    , 2010.

    CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

 

 

By:

 



    Name:   S. Jeffrey Johnson,
    Title:   Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer

D-2


Table of Contents


ANNEX E


SECTION 262 OF THE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

§ 262. Appraisal rights.

        (a)   Any stockholder of a corporation of this State who holds shares of stock on the date of the making of a demand pursuant to subsection (d) of this section with respect to such shares, who continuously holds such shares through the effective date of the merger or consolidation, who has otherwise complied with subsection (d) of this section and who has neither voted in favor of the merger or consolidation nor consented thereto in writing pursuant to § 228 of this title shall be entitled to an appraisal by the Court of Chancery of the fair value of the stockholder's shares of stock under the circumstances described in subsections (b) and (c) of this section. As used in this section, the word "stockholder" means a holder of record of stock in a stock corporation and also a member of record of a nonstock corporation; the words "stock" and "share" mean and include what is ordinarily meant by those words and also membership or membership interest of a member of a nonstock corporation; and the words "depository receipt" mean a receipt or other instrument issued by a depository representing an interest in one or more shares, or fractions thereof, solely of stock of a corporation, which stock is deposited with the depository.

        (b)   Appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a constituent corporation in a merger or consolidation to be effected pursuant to § 251 (other than a merger effected pursuant to § 251(g) of this title), § 252, § 254, § 257, § 258, § 263 or § 264 of this title:

E-1


Table of Contents

        (c)   Any corporation may provide in its certificate of incorporation that appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the shares of any class or series of its stock as a result of an amendment to its certificate of incorporation, any merger or consolidation in which the corporation is a constituent corporation or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the corporation. If the certificate of incorporation contains such a provision, the procedures of this section, including those set forth in subsections (d) and (e) of this section, shall apply as nearly as is practicable.

        (d)   Appraisal rights shall be perfected as follows:

E-2


Table of Contents

        (e)   Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation or any stockholder who has complied with subsections (a) and (d) of this section hereof and who is otherwise entitled to appraisal rights, may commence an appraisal proceeding by filing a petition in the Court of Chancery demanding a determination of the value of the stock of all such stockholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time within 60 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, any stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party shall have the right to withdraw such stockholder's demand for appraisal and to accept the terms offered upon the merger or consolidation. Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, any stockholder who has complied with the requirements of subsections (a) and (d) of this section hereof, upon written request, shall be entitled to receive from the corporation surviving the merger or resulting from the consolidation a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares not voted in favor of the merger or consolidation and with respect to which demands for appraisal have been received and the aggregate number of holders of such shares. Such written statement shall be mailed to the stockholder within 10 days after such stockholder's written request for such a statement is received by the surviving or resulting corporation or within 10 days after expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal under subsection (d) of this section hereof, whichever is later. Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, a person who is the beneficial owner of shares of such stock held either in a voting trust or by a nominee on behalf of such person may, in such person's own name, file a petition or request from the corporation the statement described in this subsection.

        (f)    Upon the filing of any such petition by a stockholder, service of a copy thereof shall be made upon the surviving or resulting corporation, which shall within 20 days after such service file in the office of the Register in Chancery in which the petition was filed a duly verified list containing the names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded payment for their shares and with whom agreements as to the value of their shares have not been reached by the surviving or resulting corporation. If the petition shall be filed by the surviving or resulting corporation, the petition shall be accompanied by such a duly verified list. The Register in Chancery, if so ordered by the Court, shall give notice of the time and place fixed for the hearing of such petition by registered or certified mail to the surviving or resulting corporation and to the stockholders shown on the list at the addresses therein stated. Such notice shall also be given by 1 or more publications at least 1 week before the day of the hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Wilmington, Delaware or such publication as the Court deems advisable. The forms of the notices by mail and by publication shall be approved by the Court, and the costs thereof shall be borne by the surviving or resulting corporation.

        (g)   At the hearing on such petition, the Court shall determine the stockholders who have complied with this section and who have become entitled to appraisal rights. The Court may require the stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to submit their certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings; and if any stockholder fails to comply with such direction, the Court may dismiss the proceedings as to such stockholder.

        (h)   After the Court determines the stockholders entitled to an appraisal, the appraisal proceeding shall be conducted in accordance with the rules of the Court of Chancery, including any rules specifically governing appraisal proceedings. Through such proceeding the Court shall determine the

E-3


Table of Contents


fair value of the shares exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger or consolidation, together with interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be the fair value. In determining such fair value, the Court shall take into account all relevant factors. Unless the Court in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause shown, interest from the effective date of the merger through the date of payment of the judgment shall be compounded quarterly and shall accrue at 5% over the Federal Reserve discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time to time during the period between the effective date of the merger and the date of payment of the judgment. Upon application by the surviving or resulting corporation or by any stockholder entitled to participate in the appraisal proceeding, the Court may, in its discretion, proceed to trial upon the appraisal prior to the final determination of the stockholders entitled to an appraisal. Any stockholder whose name appears on the list filed by the surviving or resulting corporation pursuant to subsection (f) of this section and who has submitted such stockholder's certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery, if such is required, may participate fully in all proceedings until it is finally determined that such stockholder is not entitled to appraisal rights under this section.

        (i)    The Court shall direct the payment of the fair value of the shares, together with interest, if any, by the surviving or resulting corporation to the stockholders entitled thereto. Payment shall be so made to each such stockholder, in the case of holders of uncertificated stock forthwith, and the case of holders of shares represented by certificates upon the surrender to the corporation of the certificates representing such stock. The Court's decree may be enforced as other decrees in the Court of Chancery may be enforced, whether such surviving or resulting corporation be a corporation of this State or of any state.

        (j)    The costs of the proceeding may be determined by the Court and taxed upon the parties as the Court deems equitable in the circumstances. Upon application of a stockholder, the Court may order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees and the fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata against the value of all the shares entitled to an appraisal.

        (k)   From and after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, no stockholder who has demanded appraisal rights as provided in subsection (d) of this section shall be entitled to vote such stock for any purpose or to receive payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock (except dividends or other distributions payable to stockholders of record at a date which is prior to the effective date of the merger or consolidation); provided, however, that if no petition for an appraisal shall be filed within the time provided in subsection (e) of this section, or if such stockholder shall deliver to the surviving or resulting corporation a written withdrawal of such stockholder's demand for an appraisal and an acceptance of the merger or consolidation, either within 60 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation as provided in subsection (e) of this section or thereafter with the written approval of the corporation, then the right of such stockholder to an appraisal shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no appraisal proceeding in the Court of Chancery shall be dismissed as to any stockholder without the approval of the Court, and such approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the Court deems just; provided, however that this provision shall not affect the right of any stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party to withdraw such stockholder's demand for appraisal and to accept the terms offered upon the merger or consolidation within 60 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, as set forth in subsection (e) of this section.

        (l)    The shares of the surviving or resulting corporation to which the shares of such objecting stockholders would have been converted had they assented to the merger or consolidation shall have the status of authorized and unissued shares of the surviving or resulting corporation.

E-4


Table of Contents


ANNEX F

INVESTORS RIGHTS AGREEMENT

        INVESTORS RIGHTS AGREEMENT (this "Agreement"), dated as of April 5, 2010, by and among Resaca Exploitation, Inc., a Texas corporation, with headquarters located at 1331 Lamar, Suite 1450, Houston, Texas 77010 (the "Company"), Cano Petroleum, Inc., a Delaware corporation, with headquarters located at 801 Cherry Street, Suite 3200, Fort Worth, Texas 76102 ("Cano"), and the undersigned holders of the Company's Series A Preferred Stock (each, a "Series A Holder", and collectively, the "Series A Holders"). The Company, Cano and the Series A Holders are each a "party" and together are "parties" to this Agreement.

        A.    The Company has authorized a new series of convertible preferred stock designated as "Series A Convertible Preferred Stock" (together with any convertible preferred shares issued in replacement thereof in accordance with the terms thereof, the "Series A Preferred Shares"), the terms of which are set forth in the certificate of designations for such series of preferred shares in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "Certificate of Designations"), which Series A Preferred Shares shall be convertible into the Company's common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Common Stock"), in accordance with the terms of the Certificate of Designations (as converted, the "Conversion Shares").

        B.    In connection with that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among the Company, Resaca Acquisition Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Merger Sub"), and Cano, dated September 29, 2009 (the "Merger Agreement"), the Company has agreed, upon the consummation of the merger of Merger Sub with and into Cano (the "Merger"), to exchange and to issue one (1) validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable Series A Preferred Share for each share of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock of Cano ("Cano Series D Preferred Shares").

        C.    In connection with the sale and issuance of the Cano Series D Preferred Shares, Cano and the purchasers of Cano Series D Preferred Shares at such time entered into that certain Securities Purchase Agreement, dated August 25, 2006 (the "Securities Purchase Agreement") and that certain Registration Rights Agreement, dated August 25, 2006, with Cano (the "Registration Rights Agreement"), both of which provided certain rights to the holders of Cano Series D Preferred Shares.

        D.    Since all Cano Series D Preferred Shares are exchanged for Series A Preferred Shares as part of the Merger, the Company, Cano and the Series A Holders desire to amend and restate the Securities Purchase Agreement and the Registration Rights Agreement in their entirety with this Agreement and provide the Series A Holders with certain rights, including registration rights under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder, or any similar successor statute (collectively, the "1933 Act"), and applicable state securities laws.

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and each of the Series A Holders hereby agree as follows:

1.     Definitions.

        Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings set forth in the Merger Agreement. As used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

        a.     "Business Day" means any day other than Saturday, Sunday or any other day on which commercial banks in the City of New York are authorized or required by law to remain closed.

        b.     "Closing Date" shall have the meaning set forth in the Merger Agreement.

F-1


Table of Contents

        c.     "Effective Date" means the date that the Registration Statement has been declared effective by the SEC.

        d.     "Effectiveness Deadline" means the date which is (i) in the event that the Registration Statement is not subject to any review by the SEC, ninety (90) days after the Closing Date or (ii) in the event that the Registration Statement is subject to any review by the SEC, one hundred twenty (120) days after the Closing Date.

        e.     "Eligible Market" means the NYSE, The NASDAQ Global Select Market, The NASDAQ Global Market, The NASDAQ Capital Market, the London Stock Exchange or the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange.

        f.      "Excluded Securities" shall have the meaning set forth in the Certificate of Designations.

        g.     "Filing Deadline" means the date that is forty five (45) days after the Closing Date.

        h.     "Investor" means a Series A Holder or any transferee or assignee thereof to whom a Series A Holder assigns its rights under this Agreement and who agrees to become bound by the provisions of this Agreement in accordance with Section 9 and any transferee or assignee thereof to whom a transferee or assignee assigns its rights under this Agreement and who agrees to become bound by the provisions of this Agreement in accordance with Section 9.

        i.      "Material Adverse Effect" means any material adverse effect on the business, properties, assets, operations, results of operations, condition (financial or otherwise) or prospects of the Company, its Subsidiaries, individually or taken as a whole, or on the transactions contemplated hereby or by the agreements and instruments to be entered into in connection herewith, or on the authority or ability of the Company to perform its obligations hereunder.

        j.      "Person" means an individual, a limited liability company, a partnership, a joint venture, a corporation, a trust, an unincorporated organization and a government or any department or agency thereof.

        k.     "Principal Market" means the NYSE Amex.

        l.      "Purchase Price" means the sum of (i) $1,000.00 multiplied by (ii) the number of Series A Holder's Series A Preferred Shares for which Conversion Shares are included in a Registration Statement referenced in the first sentence of Section 2(f).

        m.    "register," "registered," and "registration" refer to a registration effected by preparing and filing one or more Registration Statements (as defined below) in compliance with the 1933 Act and pursuant to Rule 415, and the declaration or ordering of effectiveness of such Registration Statement(s) by the SEC.

        n.     "Registrable Securities" means (i) Conversion Shares issued or issuable upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Shares, and (ii) any capital stock of the Company issued or issuable with respect to the Conversion Shares as a result of any stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, exchange or similar event or otherwise, without regard to any limitations on conversions of the Series A Preferred Shares.

        o.     "Registration Statement" means a registration statement or registration statements of the Company filed under the 1933 Act covering the Registrable Securities.

        p.     "Required Holders" means the holders of at least a majority of the Registrable Securities.

        q.     "Required Registration Amount" means 130% of the maximum number of Conversion Shares issued and issuable pursuant to the Certificate of Designations, as of the trading day immediately preceding the applicable date of determination, all subject to adjustment as provided in Section 2(e) (without regard to any limitations on conversion of the Series A Preferred Shares).

F-2


Table of Contents

        r.     "Rule 415" means Rule 415 under the 1933 Act or any successor rule providing for offering securities on a continuous or delayed basis.

        s.     "SEC" means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

        t.      "Securities" means the Series A Preferred Shares held by the Series A Holders and the Conversion Shares.

2.     Registration.

        a.    Mandatory Registration.     The Company shall prepare, and, as soon as practicable, but in no event later than the Filing Deadline, file with the SEC the Registration Statement on Form S-1 covering the resale of all of the Registrable Securities. The Registration Statement prepared pursuant hereto shall register for resale at least the number of shares of Common Stock equal to the Required Registration Amount determined as of the date the Registration Statement is initially filed with the SEC. The Registration Statement shall contain (except if otherwise directed by the Required Holders) the "Selling Shareholders" and "Plan of Distribution" sections in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit B. The Company shall use its best efforts to have the Registration Statement declared effective by the SEC as soon as practicable, but in no event later than the Effectiveness Deadline. By 9:30 am on the second Business Day following the Effective Date, the Company shall file with the SEC in accordance with Rule 424 under the 1933 Act the final prospectus to be used in connection with sales pursuant to such Registration Statement.


        b.
    Allocation of Registrable Securities.     The initial number of Registrable Securities included in any Registration Statement and any increase in the number of Registrable Securities included therein shall be allocated pro rata among the Investors based on the number of Registrable Securities held by each Investor at the time the Registration Statement covering such initial number of Registrable Securities or increase thereof is declared effective by the SEC. In the event that an Investor sells or otherwise transfers any of such Investor's Registrable Securities, each transferee shall be allocated a pro rata portion of the then remaining number of Registrable Securities included in such Registration Statement for such transferor. Any shares of Common Stock included in a Registration Statement and which remain allocated to any Person who ceases to hold any Registrable Securities covered by such Registration Statement shall be allocated to the remaining Investors, pro rata based on the number of Registrable Securities then held by such Investors which are covered by such Registration Statement.


        c.
    Legal Counsel.     Subject to Section 5 hereof, the Required Holders shall have the right to select one legal counsel to review and oversee any registration pursuant to this Section 2 ("Legal Counsel"), which legal counsel shall be designated in writing to the Company by the Required Holders. The Company and Legal Counsel shall reasonably cooperate with each other in performing the Company's obligations under this Agreement.


        d.
    Ineligibility for Form S-3.     In the event that Form S-3 is not available for the registration of the resale of Registrable Securities hereunder, the Company shall (i) register the resale of the Registrable Securities on another appropriate form reasonably acceptable to the Required Holders and (ii) undertake to register the Registrable Securities on Form S-3 as soon as such form is available, provided that the Company shall maintain the effectiveness of the Registration Statement then in effect until such time as a Registration Statement on Form S-3 covering the Registrable Securities has been declared effective by the SEC.


        e.
    Sufficient Number of Shares Registered.     In the event the number of shares available under a Registration Statement filed pursuant to Section 2(a) is insufficient to cover all of the Registrable Securities required to be covered by such Registration Statement or an Investor's allocated portion of the Registrable Securities pursuant to Section 2(b), the Company shall amend the applicable Registration Statement, or file a new Registration Statement (on the short form available therefor, if

F-3


Table of Contents

applicable), or both, so as to cover at least the Required Registration Amount as of the trading day immediately preceding the date of the filing of such amendment or new Registration Statement, in each case, as soon as practicable, but in any event not later than fifteen (15) days after the necessity therefor arises. The Company shall use its best efforts to cause such amendment and/or new Registration Statement to become effective as soon as practicable following the filing thereof. For purposes of the foregoing provision, the number of shares available under a Registration Statement shall be deemed "insufficient to cover all of the Registrable Securities" if at any time the number of shares of Common Stock available for resale under the Registration Statement is less than the product determined by multiplying (i) the Required Registration Amount as of such time by (ii) 0.90. The calculation set forth in the foregoing sentence shall be made without regard to any limitations on the conversion of the Series A Preferred Shares and such calculation shall assume that the Series A Preferred Shares are then convertible into shares of Common Stock at the then prevailing Conversion Rate (as defined in the Certificate of Designations).


        f.
    Effect of Failure to File and Obtain and Maintain Effectiveness of Registration Statement.     If (i) a Registration Statement covering all of the Registrable Securities required to be covered thereby and required to be filed by the Company pursuant to this Agreement is (A) not filed with the SEC on or before the respective Filing Deadline (a "Filing Failure") or (B) not declared effective by the SEC on or before the respective Effectiveness Deadline (an "Effectiveness Failure") or (ii) on any day after the Effective Date sales of all of the Registrable Securities required to be included on such Registration Statement cannot be made (other than during an Allowable Grace Period (as defined in Section 3(r)) pursuant to such Registration Statement (including, without limitation, because of a failure to keep such Registration Statement effective, to disclose such information as is necessary for sales to be made pursuant to such Registration Statement, to register a sufficient number of shares of Common Stock or to maintain a listing of the Common Stock) (a "Maintenance Failure") then, as partial relief for the damages to any holder by reason of any such delay in or reduction of its ability to sell the underlying shares of Common Stock and not as a penalty (which remedy shall not be exclusive of any other remedies available at law or in equity), the Company shall pay to each holder of Registrable Securities relating to such Registration Statement an amount in cash equal to one and one-half percent (1.5%) of the aggregate Purchase Price of such Investor's Registrable Securities included in such Registration Statement on each of the following dates: (i) the day of a Filing Failure; (ii) the day of an Effectiveness Failure; (iii) the initial day of a Maintenance Failure; (iv) on every thirtieth day after the day of a Filing Failure and thereafter (pro rated for periods totaling less than thirty days) until such Filing Failure is cured; (v) on every thirtieth day after the day of an Effectiveness Failure and thereafter (pro rated for periods totaling less than thirty days) until such Effectiveness Failure is cured; and (vi) on every thirtieth day after the initial day of a Maintenance Failure and thereafter (pro rated for periods totaling less than thirty days) until such Maintenance Failure is cured. The payments to which a holder shall be entitled pursuant to this Section 2(f) are referred to herein as "Registration Delay Payments." Registration Delay Payments shall be paid on the earlier of (I) the dates set forth above and (II) the third Business Day after the event or failure giving rise to the Registration Delay Payments is cured. In the event the Company fails to make Registration Delay Payments in a timely manner, such Registration Delay Payments shall bear interest at the rate of one and one-half percent (1.5%) per month (prorated for partial months) until paid in full. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary in no event shall the aggregate amount of Registration Delay Payments (other than Registration Delay Payments payable pursuant to events that are within the control of the Company) exceed, in the aggregate, 10% of the aggregate Purchase Price.

3.     Related Obligations.

        At such time as the Company is obligated to file a Registration Statement with the SEC pursuant to Section 2(a), 2(d) or 2(e), the Company will use its best efforts to effect the registration of the

F-4


Table of Contents


Registrable Securities in accordance with the intended method of disposition thereof and, pursuant thereto, the Company shall have the following obligations:

        a.     The Company shall promptly prepare and file with the SEC a Registration Statement with respect to the Registrable Securities and use its reasonable best efforts to cause such Registration Statement relating to the Registrable Securities to become effective as soon as practicable after such filing (but in no event later than the Effectiveness Deadline). The Company shall keep each Registration Statement effective pursuant to Rule 415 at all times until the earlier of (i) the date as of which the Investors may sell all of the Registrable Securities covered by such Registration Statement without restriction pursuant to Rule 144(b) (or any successor thereto) promulgated under the 1933 Act or (ii) the date on which the Investors shall have sold all of the Registrable Securities covered by such Registration Statement (the "Registration Period"). The Company shall ensure that each Registration Statement (including any amendments or supplements thereto and prospectuses contained therein) shall not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein, or necessary to make the statements therein (in the case of prospectuses, in the light of the circumstances in which they were made) not misleading. The term "reasonable best efforts" shall mean, among other things, that the Company shall submit to the SEC, within three (3) Business Days after the later of the date that (i) the Company learns that no review of a particular Registration Statement will be made by the staff of the SEC or that the staff has no further comments on a particular Registration Statement, as the case may be, and (ii) the approval of Legal Counsel pursuant to Section 3(c) (which approval is immediately sought and shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed), a request for acceleration of effectiveness of such Registration Statement to a time and date not later than forty-eight (48) hours after the submission of such request.

        b.     The Company shall prepare and file with the SEC such amendments (including post-effective amendments) and supplements to a Registration Statement and the prospectus used in connection with such Registration Statement, which prospectus is to be filed pursuant to Rule 424 promulgated under the 1933 Act, as may be necessary to keep such Registration Statement effective at all times during the Registration Period, and, during such period, comply with the provisions of the 1933 Act with respect to the disposition of all Registrable Securities of the Company covered by such Registration Statement until such time as all of such Registrable Securities shall have been disposed of in accordance with the intended methods of disposition by the seller or sellers thereof as set forth in such Registration Statement. In the case of amendments and supplements to a Registration Statement which are required to be filed pursuant to this Agreement (including pursuant to this Section 3(b)) by reason of the Company filing a report on Form 10-Q, Form 10-K or any analogous report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "1934 Act"), the Company shall have incorporated such report by reference into such Registration Statement, if applicable, or shall file such amendments or supplements with the SEC within one (1) Business Day after the day on which the 1934 Act report is filed which created the requirement for the Company to amend or supplement such Registration Statement.

        c.     The Company shall (A) permit Legal Counsel to review and comment upon (i) a Registration Statement at least five (5) Business Days prior to its filing with the SEC and (ii) all amendments and supplements to all Registration Statements (except for Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any similar or successor reports) within a reasonable number of days prior to their filing with the SEC, and (B) not file any Registration Statement or amendment or supplement thereto in a form to which Legal Counsel reasonably objects. The Company shall not submit a request for acceleration of the effectiveness of a Registration Statement or any amendment or supplement thereto without the prior approval of Legal Counsel, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The Company shall furnish to Legal Counsel, without charge, (i) copies of any correspondence from the SEC or the staff of the SEC to the Company or its representatives relating to any Registration Statement, (ii) promptly after the same is

F-5


Table of Contents


prepared and filed with the SEC, one copy of any Registration Statement and any amendment(s) thereto, including financial statements and schedules, all documents incorporated therein by reference, if requested by an Investor, and all exhibits and (iii) upon the effectiveness of any Registration Statement, one copy of the prospectus included in such Registration Statement and all amendments and supplements thereto. The Company shall reasonably cooperate with Legal Counsel in performing the Company's obligations pursuant to this Section 3.

        d.     The Company shall furnish to each Investor whose Registrable Securities are included in any Registration Statement, without charge, (i) promptly after the same is prepared and filed with the SEC, at least one copy of such Registration Statement and any amendment(s) thereto, including financial statements and schedules, all documents incorporated therein by reference, and, if requested by an Investor, all exhibits and each preliminary prospectus, (ii) upon the effectiveness of any Registration Statement, ten (10) copies of the prospectus included in such Registration Statement and all amendments and supplements thereto (or such other number of copies as such Investor may reasonably request) and (iii) such other documents, including copies of any preliminary or final prospectus, as such Investor may reasonably request from time to time in order to facilitate the disposition of the Registrable Securities owned by such Investor.

        e.     The Company shall use its best efforts to (i) register and qualify, unless an exemption from registration and qualification applies, the resale by Investors of the Registrable Securities covered by a Registration Statement under such other securities or "blue sky" laws of all applicable jurisdictions in the United States, (ii) prepare and file in those jurisdictions, such amendments (including post-effective amendments) and supplements to such registrations and qualifications as may be necessary to maintain the effectiveness thereof during the Registration Period, (iii) take such other actions as may be necessary to maintain such registrations and qualifications in effect at all times during the Registration Period, and (iv) take all other actions reasonably necessary or advisable to qualify the Registrable Securities for sale in such jurisdictions; provided, however, that the Company shall not be required in connection therewith or as a condition thereto to (x) qualify to do business in any jurisdiction where it would not otherwise be required to qualify but for this Section 3(e), (y) subject itself to general taxation in any such jurisdiction, or (z) file a general consent to service of process in any such jurisdiction. The Company shall promptly notify Legal Counsel and each Investor who holds Registrable Securities of the receipt by the Company of any notification with respect to the suspension of the registration or qualification of any of the Registrable Securities for sale under the securities or "blue sky" laws of any jurisdiction in the United States or its receipt of actual notice of the initiation or threatening of any proceeding for such purpose.

        f.      The Company shall notify Legal Counsel and each Investor in writing of the happening of any event, as promptly as practicable after becoming aware of such event, as a result of which the prospectus included in a Registration Statement, as then in effect, includes an untrue statement of a material fact or omission to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading (provided that in no event shall such notice contain any material, nonpublic information), and, subject to Section 3(r), promptly prepare a supplement or amendment to such Registration Statement to correct such untrue statement or omission, and deliver ten (10) copies of such supplement or amendment to Legal Counsel and each Investor (or such other number of copies as Legal Counsel or such Investor may reasonably request). The Company shall also promptly notify Legal Counsel and each Investor in writing (i) when a prospectus or any prospectus supplement or post-effective amendment has been filed, and when a Registration Statement or any post-effective amendment has become effective (notification of such effectiveness shall be delivered to Legal Counsel and each Investor by facsimile or e-mail on the same day of such effectiveness and by overnight mail), (ii) of any request by the SEC for amendments or supplements to a Registration Statement or related prospectus

F-6


Table of Contents


or related information, and (iii) of the Company's reasonable determination that a post-effective amendment to a Registration Statement would be appropriate.

        g.     The Company shall use its best efforts to prevent the issuance of any stop order or other suspension of effectiveness of a Registration Statement, or the suspension of the qualification of any of the Registrable Securities for sale in any jurisdiction and, if such an order or suspension is issued, to obtain the withdrawal of such order or suspension at the earliest possible moment and to notify Legal Counsel and each Investor who holds Registrable Securities being sold of the issuance of such order and the resolution thereof or its receipt of actual notice of the initiation or threat of any proceeding for such purpose.

        h.     If any Investor is deemed to be, alleged to be or reasonably believes it may be deemed or alleged to be, an underwriter or is required under applicable securities laws to be described in the Registration Statement as an underwriter, at the reasonable request of such Investor, the Company shall furnish to such Investor, on the date of the effectiveness of the Registration Statement and thereafter from time to time on such dates as an Investor may reasonably request (i) a letter, dated such date, from the Company's independent certified public accountants in form and substance as is customarily given by independent certified public accountants to underwriters in an underwritten public offering, addressed to the Investors, and (ii) an opinion, dated as of such date, of counsel representing the Company for purposes of such Registration Statement, in form, scope and substance as is customarily given in an underwritten public offering, addressed to the Investors.

        i.      Upon the written request of any Investor in connection with such Investor's due diligence requirements, if any, the Company shall make available for inspection by (i) any Investor, (ii) Legal Counsel and (iii) one firm of accountants or other agents retained by the Investors (collectively, the "Inspectors"), all pertinent financial and other records, and pertinent corporate documents and properties of the Company (collectively, the "Records"), as shall be reasonably deemed necessary by each Inspector, and cause the Company's officers, directors and employees, counsel and the Company's independent certified public accountants to supply all information which may be necessary and any Inspector may reasonably request; provided, however, that each Inspector shall agree to hold in strict confidence and shall not make any disclosure (except to an Investor) or use of any Record or other information which the Company determines in good faith to be confidential, and of which determination the Inspectors are so notified, unless (a) the disclosure of such Records is necessary to avoid or correct a misstatement or omission in any Registration Statement or is otherwise required under the 1933 Act, (b) the release of such Records is ordered pursuant to a final, non-appealable subpoena or order from a court or government body of competent jurisdiction, or (c) the information in such Records has been made generally available to the public other than by disclosure in violation of this Agreement. Each Investor agrees that it shall, upon learning that disclosure of such Records is sought in or by a court or governmental body of competent jurisdiction or through other means, give prompt notice to the Company and allow the Company, at its expense, to undertake appropriate action to prevent disclosure of, or to obtain a protective order for, the Records deemed confidential. Nothing herein (or in any other confidentiality agreement between the Company and any Investor) shall be deemed to limit the Investors' ability to sell Registrable Securities in a manner which is otherwise consistent with applicable laws and regulations.

        j.      The Company shall hold in confidence and not make any disclosure of information concerning an Investor provided to the Company unless (i) disclosure of such information is necessary to comply with federal or state securities laws, (ii) the disclosure of such information is necessary to avoid or correct a misstatement or omission in any Registration Statement, (iii) the release of such information is ordered pursuant to a subpoena or other final, non-appealable order from a court or governmental body of competent jurisdiction, or (iv) such information has been made generally available to the public other than by disclosure in violation of this Agreement or any other agreement. The Company agrees that it shall, upon learning that disclosure of such information concerning an Investor is sought in or by

F-7


Table of Contents


a court or governmental body of competent jurisdiction or through other means, give prompt written notice to such Investor and allow such Investor, at the Investor's expense, to undertake appropriate action to prevent disclosure of, or to obtain a protective order for, such information.

        k.     The Company shall use its best efforts either to (i) cause all of the Registrable Securities covered by a Registration Statement to be listed on each securities exchange on which securities of the same class or series issued by the Company are then listed, if any, if the listing of such Registrable Securities is then permitted under the rules of such exchange or (ii) secure the inclusion for quotation of all of the Registrable Securities on The NASDAQ Global Market or The NASDAQ Global Select Market, or (iii) if, despite the Company's best efforts, the Company is unsuccessful in satisfying the preceding clauses (i) or (ii), to secure the inclusion for quotation on The NASDAQ Capital Market for such Registrable Securities and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to use its best efforts to arrange for at least two market makers to register with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority as such with respect to such Registrable Securities. The Company shall pay all fees and expenses in connection with satisfying its obligation under this Section 3(k).

        l.      The Company shall cooperate with the Investors who hold Registrable Securities being offered and, to the extent applicable, facilitate the timely preparation and delivery of certificates (not bearing any restrictive legend) representing the Registrable Securities to be offered pursuant to a Registration Statement and enable such certificates to be in such denominations or amounts, as the case may be, as the Investors may reasonably request and registered in such names as the Investors may request.

        m.    If requested by an Investor, the Company shall as soon as practicable but in no event later than five (5) days after the receipt of notice from such Investor, (i) incorporate in a prospectus supplement or post-effective amendment such information as an Investor reasonably requests to be included therein relating to the sale and distribution of Registrable Securities, including, without limitation, information with respect to the number of Registrable Securities being offered or sold, the purchase price being paid therefor and any other terms of the offering of the Registrable Securities to be sold in such offering; (ii) make all required filings of such prospectus supplement or post-effective amendment after being notified of the matters to be incorporated in such prospectus supplement or post-effective amendment; and (iii) supplement or make amendments to any Registration Statement if reasonably requested by an Investor holding any Registrable Securities.

        n.     The Company shall use its best efforts to cause the Registrable Securities covered by the Registration Statement to be registered with or approved by such other governmental agencies or authorities as may be necessary to consummate the disposition of such Registrable Securities.

        o.     The Company shall make generally available to its security holders as soon as practical, but not later than ninety (90) days after the close of the period covered thereby, an earnings statement (in form complying with, and in the manner provided by, the provisions of Rule 158 under the 1933 Act) covering a twelve-month period beginning not later than the first day of the Company's fiscal quarter next following the effective date of the Registration Statement.

        p.     The Company shall otherwise use its best efforts to comply with all applicable rules and regulations of the SEC in connection with any registration hereunder.

        q.     Within two (2) Business Days after a Registration Statement which covers Registrable Securities is ordered effective by the SEC, the Company shall deliver, and shall cause legal counsel for the Company to deliver, to the transfer agent for such Registrable Securities (with copies to the Investors whose Registrable Securities are included in such Registration Statement) confirmation that such Registration Statement has been declared effective by the SEC in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C.

F-8


Table of Contents

        r.      Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, at any time after the Effective Date, the Company may delay the disclosure of material, non-public information concerning the Company the disclosure of which at the time is not, in the good faith opinion of the Board of Directors of the Company and its counsel, in the best interest of the Company and, in the opinion of counsel to the Company, otherwise required (a "Grace Period"); provided, that the Company shall promptly (i) notify the Investors in writing of the existence of material, non-public information giving rise to a Grace Period (provided that in each notice the Company will not disclose the content of such material, non-public information to the Investors) and the date on which the Grace Period will begin, and (ii) notify the Investors in writing of the date on which the Grace Period ends; and, provided further, that no Grace Period shall exceed twelve (12) consecutive days and during any three hundred sixty-five (365) day period such Grace Periods shall not exceed an aggregate of twenty-five (25) days and the first day of any Grace Period must be at least five (5) trading days after the last day of any prior Grace Period (each, an "Allowable Grace Period"). For purposes of determining the length of a Grace Period above, the Grace Period shall begin on and include the date the Investors receive the notice referred to in clause (i) and shall end on and include the later of the date the Investors receive the notice referred to in clause (ii) and the date referred to in such notice. The provisions of Section 3(f) hereof shall not be applicable during the period of any Allowable Grace Period. Upon expiration of the Grace Period, the Company shall again be bound by the first sentence of Section 3(f) with respect to the information giving rise thereto unless such material, non-public information is no longer applicable. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the Company shall cause its transfer agent to deliver unlegended shares of Common Stock to a transferee of an Investor in connection with any sale of Registrable Securities with respect to which an Investor has entered into a contract for sale, and delivered a copy of the prospectus included as part of the applicable Registration Statement (unless an exemption from such delivery requirement exists), prior to the Investor's receipt of the notice of a Grace Period and for which the Investor has not yet settled.

4.     Obligations of the Investors.

        a.     At least ten (10) Business Days prior to the first anticipated filing date of a Registration Statement, the Company shall notify each Investor in writing of the information the Company requires from each such Investor if such Investor elects to have any of such Investor's Registrable Securities included in such Registration Statement. It shall be a condition precedent to the obligations of the Company to complete the registration pursuant to this Agreement with respect to the Registrable Securities of a particular Investor that such Investor shall furnish to the Company such information regarding itself, the Registrable Securities held by it and the intended method of disposition of the Registrable Securities held by it, as shall be reasonably required to effect and maintain the effectiveness of the registration of such Registrable Securities and shall execute such documents in connection with such registration as the Company may reasonably request.

        b.     Each Investor, by such Investor's acceptance of the Registrable Securities, agrees to cooperate with the Company as reasonably requested by the Company in connection with the preparation and filing of any Registration Statement hereunder, unless such Investor has notified the Company in writing of such Investor's election to exclude all of such Investor's Registrable Securities from such Registration Statement.

        c.     Each Investor agrees that, upon receipt of any notice from the Company of the happening of any event of the kind described in Section 3(g) or the first sentence of 3(f), such Investor will immediately discontinue disposition of Registrable Securities pursuant to any Registration Statement(s) covering such Registrable Securities until such Investor's receipt of the copies of the supplemented or amended prospectus contemplated by the first sentence of 3(f) or receipt of notice that no supplement or amendment is required. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the Company shall cause its transfer agent to deliver unlegended shares of Common Stock to a transferee of an Investor in

F-9


Table of Contents


connection with any sale of Registrable Securities with respect to which an Investor has entered into a contract for sale prior to the Investor's receipt of a notice from the Company of the happening of any event of the kind described in Section 3(g) or the first sentence of 3(f) and for which the Investor has not yet settled.

        d.     Each Investor covenants and agrees that it will comply with the prospectus delivery requirements of the 1933 Act as applicable to it or an exemption therefrom in connection with sales of Registrable Securities pursuant to the Registration Statement.

5.     Expenses of Registration.

        All reasonable expenses, other than underwriting discounts and commissions, incurred in connection with registrations, filings or qualifications pursuant to Sections 2 and 3, including, without limitation, all registration, listing and qualifications fees, printers and accounting fees, and fees and disbursements of counsel for the Company shall be paid by the Company. The Company shall also reimburse the Investors for the fees and disbursements of Legal Counsel in connection with registration, filing or qualification pursuant to Sections 2 and 3 of this Agreement which amount shall be limited to $15,000.

6.     Indemnification.

        In the event any Registrable Securities are included in a Registration Statement under this Agreement:

        a.     To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Company will, and hereby does, indemnify, hold harmless and defend each Investor, the directors, officers, members, partners, employees, agents, representatives of, and each Person, if any, who controls any Investor within the meaning of the 1933 Act or the 1934 Act (each, an "Indemnified Person"), against any losses, claims, damages, liabilities, judgments, fines, penalties, charges, costs, reasonable attorneys' fees, amounts paid in settlement or expenses, joint or several, other than consequential, indirect or incidental damages (collectively, "Claims") incurred in investigating, preparing or defending any action, claim, suit, inquiry, proceeding, investigation or appeal taken from the foregoing by or before any court or governmental, administrative or other regulatory agency, body or the SEC, whether pending or threatened, whether or not an indemnified party is or may be a party thereto ("Indemnified Damages"), to which any of them may become subject insofar as such Claims (or actions or proceedings, whether commenced or threatened, in respect thereof) arise out of or are based upon: (i) any untrue statement or alleged untrue statement of a material fact in a Registration Statement or any post-effective amendment thereto or in any filing made in connection with the qualification of the offering under the securities or other "blue sky" laws of any jurisdiction in which Registrable Securities are offered ("Blue Sky Filing"), or the omission or alleged omission to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, (ii) any untrue statement or alleged untrue statement of a material fact contained in any preliminary prospectus if used prior to the effective date of such Registration Statement, or contained in the final prospectus (as amended or supplemented, if the Company files any amendment thereof or supplement thereto with the SEC) or the omission or alleged omission to state therein any material fact necessary to make the statements made therein, in light of the circumstances under which the statements therein were made, not misleading, (iii) any violation or alleged violation by the Company of the 1933 Act, the 1934 Act, any other law, including, without limitation, any state securities law, or any rule or regulation thereunder relating to the offer or sale of the Registrable Securities pursuant to a Registration Statement or (iv) any violation of this Agreement (the matters in the foregoing clauses (i) through (iv) being, collectively, "Violations"). Subject to Section 6(c), the Company shall reimburse the Indemnified Persons, promptly as such expenses are incurred and are due and payable, for any legal fees or other reasonable expenses incurred by them in connection with investigating or defending any such Claim. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein,

F-10


Table of Contents


the indemnification agreement contained in this Section 6(a): (i) shall not apply to a Claim by an Indemnified Person arising out of or based upon a Violation which occurs in reliance upon and in conformity with information furnished in writing to the Company by such Indemnified Person for such Indemnified Person expressly for use in connection with the preparation of the Registration Statement or any such amendment thereof or supplement thereto, if such prospectus was timely made available by the Company pursuant to Section 3(d) and (ii) shall not apply to amounts paid in settlement of any Claim if such settlement is effected without the prior written consent of the Company, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Such indemnity shall remain in full force and effect regardless of any investigation made by or on behalf of the Indemnified Person and shall survive the transfer of the Registrable Securities by the Investors pursuant to Section 9.

        b.     In connection with any Registration Statement in which an Investor is participating, each such Investor agrees to severally and not jointly indemnify, hold harmless and defend, to the same extent and in the same manner as is set forth in Section 6(a), the Company, each of its directors, each of its officers who signs the Registration Statement and each Person, if any, who controls the Company within the meaning of the 1933 Act or the 1934 Act (each, an "Indemnified Party"), against any Claim or Indemnified Damages to which any of them may become subject, under the 1933 Act, the 1934 Act or otherwise, insofar as such Claim or Indemnified Damages arise out of or are based upon any Violation, in each case to the extent, and only to the extent, that such Violation occurs in reliance upon and in conformity with written information furnished to the Company by such Investor expressly for use in connection with such Registration Statement; and, subject to Section 6(c), such Investor will reimburse any legal or other expenses reasonably incurred by an Indemnified Party in connection with investigating or defending any such Claim; provided, however, that the indemnity agreement contained in this Section 6(b) and the agreement with respect to contribution contained in Section 7 shall not apply to amounts paid in settlement of any Claim if such settlement is effected without the prior written consent of such Investor, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed; provided, further, however, that the Investor shall be liable under this Section 6(b) for only that amount of a Claim or Indemnified Damages as does not exceed the net proceeds to such Investor as a result of the sale of Registrable Securities pursuant to such Registration Statement. Such indemnity shall remain in full force and effect regardless of any investigation made by or on behalf of such Indemnified Party and shall survive the transfer of the Registrable Securities by the Investors pursuant to Section 9.

        c.     Promptly after receipt by an Indemnified Person or Indemnified Party under this Section 6 of notice of the commencement of any action or proceeding (including any governmental action or proceeding) involving a Claim, such Indemnified Person or Indemnified Party shall, if a Claim in respect thereof is to be made against any indemnifying party under this Section 6, deliver to the indemnifying party a written notice of the commencement thereof, and the indemnifying party shall have the right to participate in, and, to the extent the indemnifying party so desires, jointly with any other indemnifying party similarly noticed, to assume control of the defense thereof with counsel mutually satisfactory to the indemnifying party and the Indemnified Person or the Indemnified Party, as the case may be; provided, however, that an Indemnified Person or Indemnified Party shall have the right to retain its own counsel with the fees and expenses of not more than one counsel for such Indemnified Person or Indemnified Party to be paid by the indemnifying party, if, in the reasonable opinion of counsel retained by the indemnifying party, the representation by such counsel of the Indemnified Person or Indemnified Party and the indemnifying party would be inappropriate due to actual or potential differing interests between such Indemnified Person or Indemnified Party and any other party represented by such counsel in such proceeding. In the case of an Indemnified Person, legal counsel referred to in the immediately preceding sentence shall be selected by the Investors holding at least a majority in interest of the Registrable Securities included in the Registration Statement to which the Claim relates. The Indemnified Party or Indemnified Person shall cooperate reasonably with the indemnifying party in connection with any negotiation or defense of any such action or Claim by the

F-11


Table of Contents


indemnifying party and shall furnish to the indemnifying party all information reasonably available to the Indemnified Party or Indemnified Person which relates to such action or Claim. The indemnifying party shall keep the Indemnified Party or Indemnified Person fully apprised at all times as to the status of the defense or any settlement negotiations with respect thereto. No indemnifying party shall be liable for any settlement of any action, claim or proceeding effected without its prior written consent, provided, however, that the indemnifying party shall not unreasonably withhold, delay or condition its consent. No indemnifying party shall, without the prior written consent of the Indemnified Party or Indemnified Person, consent to entry of any judgment or enter into any settlement or other compromise which does not include as an unconditional term thereof the giving by the claimant or plaintiff to such Indemnified Party or Indemnified Person of a release from all liability in respect to such Claim or litigation, and such settlement shall not include any admission as to fault on the part of the Indemnified Party or the Indemnified Person. Following indemnification as provided for hereunder, the indemnifying party shall be subrogated to all rights of the Indemnified Party or Indemnified Person with respect to all third parties, firms or corporations relating to the matter for which indemnification has been made. The failure to deliver written notice to the indemnifying party within a reasonable time of the commencement of any such action shall not relieve such indemnifying party of any liability to the Indemnified Person or Indemnified Party under this Section 6, except to the extent that the indemnifying party is prejudiced in its ability to defend such action.

        d.     The indemnification required by this Section 6 shall be made by periodic payments of the amount thereof during the course of the investigation or defense, as and when bills are received or Indemnified Damages are incurred.

        e.     The indemnity agreements contained herein shall be in addition to (i) any cause of action or similar right of the Indemnified Party or Indemnified Person against the indemnifying party or others, and (ii) any liabilities the indemnifying party may be subject to pursuant to the law.

7.     Contribution.

        To the extent any indemnification by an indemnifying party is prohibited or limited by law, the indemnifying party agrees to make the maximum contribution with respect to any amounts for which it would otherwise be liable under Section 6 to the fullest extent permitted by law; provided, however, that: (i) no Person involved in the sale of Registrable Securities which Person is guilty of fraudulent misrepresentation (within the meaning of Section 11(f) of the 1933 Act) in connection with such sale shall be entitled to contribution from any Person involved in such sale of Registrable Securities who was not guilty of fraudulent misrepresentation; and (ii) contribution by any seller of Registrable Securities shall be limited in amount to the net amount of proceeds received by such seller from the sale of such Registrable Securities pursuant to such Registration Statement.

8.     Reports Under the 1934 Act.

        With a view to making available to the Investors the benefits of Rule 144 promulgated under the 1933 Act or any other similar rule or regulation of the SEC that may at any time permit the Investors to sell securities of the Company to the public without registration ("Rule 144"), the Company agrees to:

        a.     make and keep adequate current public information with respect to the Company available, as required by Rule 144;

        b.     file with the SEC in a timely manner all reports and other documents required of the Company under the 1933 Act and the 1934 Act so long as the Company remains subject to such requirements (it being understood that nothing herein shall limit the Company's obligations under Section 10(a)) and the filing of such reports and other documents is required for the applicable provisions of Rule 144; and

F-12


Table of Contents

        c.     furnish to each Investor so long as such Investor owns Registrable Securities, promptly upon request, (i) a written statement by the Company, if true, that it has complied with the reporting requirements of Rule 144, the 1933 Act and the 1934 Act, (ii) a copy of the most recent annual or quarterly report of the Company and such other reports and documents so filed by the Company, and (iii) such other information as may be reasonably requested to permit the Investors to sell such securities pursuant to Rule 144 without registration.

9.     Assignment of Investor's Rights.

        The rights under this Agreement shall be automatically assignable by the Investors to any transferee of all or any portion of such Investor's Registrable Securities if: (i) the Investor agrees in writing with the transferee or assignee to assign such rights, and a copy of such agreement is furnished to the Company within a reasonable time after such assignment; (ii) the Company is, within a reasonable time after such transfer or assignment, furnished with written notice of (a) the name and address of such transferee or assignee, and (b) the securities with respect to which such registration rights are being transferred or assigned; (iii) immediately following such transfer or assignment the further disposition of such securities by the transferee or assignee is restricted under the 1933 Act or applicable state securities laws; (iv) at or before the time the Company receives the written notice contemplated by clause (ii) of this sentence the transferee or assignee agrees in writing with the Company to be bound by all of the provisions contained herein; and (v) such transfer shall have been made in accordance with other applicable requirements set forth herein.

10.   Additional Covenants.


        a.
    Reporting Status.     Until the date on which the Series A Holders shall have sold all the Conversion Shares and none of the Series A Preferred Shares are outstanding (the "Reporting Period"), the Company shall timely file all reports required to be filed with the SEC pursuant to the 1934 Act, and the Company shall not terminate its status as an issuer required to file reports under the 1934 Act even if the 1934 Act or the rules and regulations thereunder would no longer require or otherwise permit such termination. From the time Form S-3 is available to the Company for the registration of the Conversion Shares, the Company shall take all actions necessary to maintain its eligibility to register the Conversion Shares for resale by the Series A Holders on Form S-3 and at all times the Company shall conduct its business in accordance with applicable law.


        b.
    Financial Information.     The Company agrees to send the following to each Investor during the Reporting Period (i) unless the following are filed with the SEC through EDGAR and are available to the public through the EDGAR system, within one (1) Business Day after the filing thereof with the SEC, a copy of its Annual Reports and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-K or 10-Q, any interim reports or any consolidated balance sheets, income statements, shareholders' equity statements and/or cash flow statements for any period other than annual, any Current Reports on Form 8-K and any registration statements (other than on Form S-8) or amendments filed pursuant to the 1933 Act and (ii) copies of any notices and other information made available or given to the shareholders of the Company generally, contemporaneously with the making available or giving thereof to the shareholders.


        c.
    Listing.     The Company shall promptly secure the listing of all of the Registrable Securities upon each national securities exchange and automated quotation system, if any, upon which the Common Stock is then listed (subject to official notice of issuance). The Company shall maintain the Common Stock's authorization for quotation on the Principal Market or any Eligible Market. Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries shall take any action which would be reasonably expected to result in the delisting or suspension of the Common Stock on the Principal Market. The Company shall pay all fees and expenses in connection with satisfying its obligations under this Section 10(c).

F-13


Table of Contents


        d.
    Pledge of Securities.     The Company acknowledges and agrees that the Securities may be pledged by an Investor in connection with a bona fide margin agreement or other loan or financing arrangement that is secured by the Securities. The pledge of Securities shall not be deemed to be a transfer, sale or assignment of the Securities hereunder, and no Investor effecting a pledge of Securities shall be required to provide the Company with any notice thereof or otherwise make any delivery to the Company pursuant to this Agreement. The Company hereby agrees to execute and deliver such documentation as a pledgee of the Securities may reasonably request in connection with a pledge of the Securities to such pledgee by an Investor.


        e.
    Disclosure of Transactions and Other Material Information.     On or before 8:30 a.m., New York City time, on the third Business Day following the date of this Agreement, the Company shall issue a press release and file a Current Report on Form 8-K describing the terms of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement in the form required by the 1934 Act and attaching the Agreement (including, without limitation, all schedules to this Agreement) as an exhibit to such filing (including all attachments, the "8-K Filing"). From and after the filing of the 8-K Filing with the SEC, no Investor shall be in possession of any material, nonpublic information received from the Company, any of its Subsidiaries or any of its respective officers, directors, employees or agents, that is not disclosed in the 8-K Filing. The Company shall not, and shall cause each of its Subsidiaries and its and each of their respective officers, directors, employees and agents, not to, provide any Investor with any material, nonpublic information regarding the Company or any of its Subsidiaries from and after the filing of the 8-K Filing with the SEC without the express written consent of such Investor or as may be required under the terms of this Agreement. If an Investor has, or believes it has, received any such material, nonpublic information regarding the Company or any of its Subsidiaries directly from the Company, any of its Subsidiaries, any of their affiliates, officers, directors or any other Person acting on their behalf, it shall provide the Company with written notice thereof. The Company shall, within five (5) Trading Days (as defined in the Certificate of Designations) of receipt of such notice, make public disclosure of such material, nonpublic information. In the event of a breach of the foregoing covenant by the Company, any of its Subsidiaries, or any of its or their respective officers, directors, employees and agents, in addition to any other remedy provided herein, an Investor shall have the right to make a public disclosure, in the form of a press release, public advertisement or otherwise, of such material, nonpublic information without the prior approval by the Company, its Subsidiaries, or any of its or their respective officers, directors, employees or agents. No Investor shall have any liability to the Company, its Subsidiaries, or any of its or their respective officers, directors, employees, shareholders or agents for any such disclosure. Subject to the foregoing, neither the Company, its Subsidiaries nor any Investor shall issue any press releases or any other public statements with respect to the transactions contemplated hereby; provided, however, that the Company shall be entitled, without the prior approval of any Investor, to make any press release or other public disclosure with respect to such transactions (i) in substantial conformity with the 8-K Filing and contemporaneously therewith and (ii) as is required by applicable law and regulations (provided that in the case of clause (i) each Investor shall be consulted by the Company in connection with any such press release or other public disclosure prior to its release). Without the prior written consent of any applicable Investor, neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries or affiliates shall disclose the name of such Investor in any filing, announcement, release or otherwise, unless such disclosure is required by law, regulation or the Principal Market.


        f.
    Additional Registration Statements.     Except for registration statements filed in connection with the Merger or the Offering (as defined below), until the Effective Date, the Company shall not file a registration statement under the 1933 Act relating to securities that are not the Securities.


        g.
    Corporate Existence.     So long as any Series A Holder beneficially owns any Series A Preferred Shares, the Company shall not be party to any Fundamental Transaction (as defined in the Certificate

F-14


Table of Contents

of Designations) unless the Company is in compliance with the applicable provisions governing Fundamental Transactions set forth in the Certificate of Designations.


        h.
    Reservation of Shares.     The Company shall take all action necessary to at all times have authorized, and reserved for the purpose of issuance, no less than 130% of the maximum number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Shares (assuming for purposes hereof, that the Series A Preferred Shares are convertible at the Conversion Price and without taking into account any limitations on the conversion of the Series A Preferred Shares set forth in the Certificate of Designations).


        i.
    Conduct of Business.     The business of the Company and its Subsidiaries shall not be conducted in violation of any law, ordinance or regulation of any governmental entity, except where such violations would not result, either individually or in the aggregate, in a Material Adverse Effect.


        j.
    Additional Issuances of Securities.     

F-15


Table of Contents

F-16


Table of Contents

F-17


Table of Contents


        k.    Withholding Taxes.     On each Dividend Date (as defined in the Certificate of Designations), if the Company does not have current or accumulated "earnings and profits" within the meaning of Sections 301 and 312 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, through such Dividend Date, the Company shall not withhold any amount of the applicable Dividend (as defined in the Certificate of Designations) in respect of U.S. federal income tax. On or prior to any such Dividend Date, the Company shall deliver a transmittal letter to the Series A Holder or the Series A Holder's prime broker indicating whether the Company believes it must withhold any amount of such Dividend, whether the Company has any "earnings or profits" and the calculations, in reasonable detail, supporting such calculations.

        l.      [Intentionally omitted]


        m.
    Trading in Common Stock.     For so long as such Series A Holder owns any Securities, such Series A Holder shall not maintain a Net Short Position. For purposes of this Section, a "Net Short Position" by a person means a position whereby such person has executed one or more sales of Common Stock that is marked as a short sale and that is executed at a time when such Series A Holder has no equivalent offsetting long position in the Common Stock or contract for the foregoing. For purposes of determining whether a Series A Holder has an equivalent offsetting long position in the Common Stock, all Common Stock (i) that is owned by such Series A Holder, (ii) that may be issued pursuant to the terms of the Certificate of Designations to the Series A Holder or (iii) that would be issuable upon conversion or exercise in full of all securities of the Series A Holder (including the Securities) then held by such Series A Holder (assuming that such securities were then fully convertible or exercisable, notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary, and giving effect to any conversion or exercise price adjustments that would take effect given only the passage of time) shall be deemed to be held long by such Series A Holder. Without limiting the foregoing, the Series A Holders may engage in hedging activities at various times during the period following the public announcement of the execution of this Agreement as provided in Section 10(e), and during the period that any Securities are outstanding.


        n.
    Transfer or Resale.     Each Series A Holder understands that except as provided in this Agreement: (i) the Securities have not been and are not being registered under the 1933 Act or any state securities laws, and may not be offered for sale, sold, assigned or transferred unless (A) subsequently registered thereunder, (B) such Series A Holder shall have delivered to the Company an opinion of counsel, in a generally acceptable form, to the effect that such Securities to be sold, assigned or transferred may be sold, assigned or transferred pursuant to an exemption from such registration, or (C) such Series A Holder provides the Company with reasonable assurance that such Securities can be sold, assigned or transferred pursuant to Rule 144 or Rule 144A promulgated under the 1933 Act; (ii) any sale of the Securities made in reliance on Rule 144 may be made only in accordance with the terms of Rule 144 and further, if Rule 144 is not applicable, any resale of the Securities under circumstances in which the seller (or the Person) through whom the sale is made) may be deemed to be an underwriter (as that term is defined in the 1933 Act) may require compliance with

F-18


Table of Contents

some other exemption under the 1933 Act or the rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder; and (iii) neither the Company nor any other Person is under any obligation to register the Securities under the 1933 Act or any state securities laws or to comply with the terms and conditions of any exemption thereunder. The Securities may be pledged in connection with a bona fide margin account or other loan or financing arrangement secured by the Securities and such pledge of Securities shall not be deemed to be a transfer, sale or assignment of the Securities hereunder, and no Series A Holder effecting a pledge of Securities shall be required to provide the Company with any notice thereof or otherwise make any delivery to the Company pursuant to this Agreement, including, without limitation, this Section 10(n).


        o.
    Legends.     Each Series A Holder understands that the certificates or other instruments representing the Series A Preferred Shares and the stock certificates representing the Conversion Shares, except as set forth below, shall bear any legend as required by the "blue sky" laws of any state and a restrictive legend in substantially the following form (and a stop-transfer order may be placed against transfer of such stock certificates):

The legend set forth above shall be removed and the Company shall issue a certificate without such legend to the holder of the Series A Preferred Shares upon which it is stamped, if, unless otherwise required by state securities laws, (i) such Series A Preferred Shares are registered for resale under the 1933 Act, (ii) in connection with a sale, assignment or other transfer, such holder provides the Company with an opinion of counsel, in a generally acceptable form, to the effect that such sale, assignment or transfer of the Series A Preferred Shares may be made without registration under the applicable requirements of the 1933 Act, or (iii) such holder provides the Company with reasonable assurance that the Series A Preferred Shares can be sold, assigned or transferred pursuant to Rule 144(b).

11.   Register; Transfer Agent Instructions.

        a.    Register.     The Company shall maintain at its principal executive offices (or such other office or agency of the Company as it may designate by notice to each holder of Securities), a register for the Series A Preferred Shares and the Conversion Shares in which the Company shall record the name and address of the Person in whose name the Series A Preferred Shares and the Conversion Shares have been issued (including the name and address of each transferee), the number of Series A Preferred Shares held by such Person and the number of Conversion Shares issuable upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Shares held by such Person. The Company shall keep the register open and available at all times during business hours for inspection of any Series A Holder or its legal representatives.

F-19


Table of Contents


        b.
    Transfer Agent Instructions.     The Company shall issue irrevocable instructions to its transfer agent (the "Transfer Agent"), and any subsequent transfer agent, to issue certificates or credit shares to the applicable balance accounts at the Transfer Agent, registered in the name of each Series A Holder or its respective nominee(s), for the Series A Preferred Shares issued at the Closing and for the Conversion Shares in such amounts as specified from time to time by each Series A Holder to the Company upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Shares in the form of Exhibit D attached hereto (the "Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instructions"). The Company warrants that no instruction other than the Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instructions referred to in this Section 11(b), and stop transfer instructions to give effect to Section 10(o) hereof, will be given by the Company to its transfer agent with respect to the Securities, and that the Securities shall otherwise be freely transferable on the books and records of the Company, as applicable, and to the extent provided in this Agreement. If a Series A Holder effects a sale, assignment or transfer of the Securities in accordance with Section 10(n), the Company shall permit the transfer and shall promptly instruct its transfer agent to issue one or more certificates or credit shares to the applicable balance accounts at the Transfer Agent in such name and in such denominations as specified by such Series A Holder to effect such sale, transfer or assignment. In the event that such sale, assignment or transfer involves Conversion Shares sold, assigned or transferred pursuant to an effective registration statement with prospectus delivery (unless an exemption from the prospectus delivery requirements is available), or pursuant to Rule 144, the transfer agent shall issue such Securities to the Series A Holder, assignee or transferee, as the case may be, without any restrictive legend.


        c.
    Breach.     The Company acknowledges that a breach by it of its obligations under this Section 11 will cause irreparable harm to a Series A Holder and that the remedy at law for a breach of its obligations under this Section 11 will be inadequate. In addition, the Company agrees, in the event of a breach or threatened breach by the Company of the provisions of this Section 11, that a Series A Holder shall be entitled, in addition to all other available remedies, to seek an order and/or injunction restraining any breach and requiring immediate issuance and transfer, without the necessity of showing economic loss and without any bond or other security being required.


        d.
    Additional Relief.     If the Company shall fail for any reason or for no reason to issue to such holder unlegended certificates within three (3) Business Days of receipt of documents necessary for the removal of legend set forth above (the "Deadline Date"), then, in addition to all other remedies available to the holder, if on or after the Trading Day (as defined in the Certificate of Designations) immediately following such three (3) Business Day period, the holder purchases (in an open market transaction or otherwise) shares of Common Stock to deliver in satisfaction of a sale by the holder of shares of Common Stock that the holder anticipated receiving from the Company (a "Buy-In"), then the Company shall, within three (3) Business Days after the holder's request and in the holder's discretion, either (i) pay cash to the holder in an amount equal to the holder's total purchase price (including brokerage commissions, if any) for the shares of Common Stock so purchased (the "Buy-In Price"), at which point the Company's obligation to deliver such certificate (and to issue such shares of Common Stock) shall terminate, or (ii) promptly honor its obligation to deliver to the holder a certificate or certificates representing such shares of Common Stock and pay cash to the holder in an amount equal to the excess (if any) of the Buy-In Price over the product of (A) such number of shares of Common Stock, times (B) the Closing Bid Price on the Deadline Date. "Closing Bid Price" means, for any security as of any date, the last closing price for such security on the Principal Market, as reported by Bloomberg (as defined in the Certificate of Designations), or, if the Principal Market begins to operate on an extended hours basis and does not designate the closing bid price then the last bid price of such security prior to 4:00:00 p.m., New York Time, as reported by Bloomberg, or, if the Principal Market is not the principal securities exchange or trading market for such security, the last closing price of such security on the principal securities exchange or trading market where such security is listed or traded as reported by Bloomberg, or if the foregoing do not apply, the last closing price of such security in the over-the-counter market on the electronic bulletin board for such security as

F-20


Table of Contents

reported by Bloomberg, or, if no closing bid price is reported for such security by Bloomberg, the average of the bid prices of any market makers for such security as reported in the "pink sheets" by Pink Sheets LLC (formerly the National Quotation Bureau, Inc.). If the Closing Bid Price cannot be calculated for a security on a particular date on any of the foregoing bases, the Closing Bid Price of such security on such date shall be the fair market value as mutually determined by the Company and the holder. If the Company and the holder are unable to agree upon the fair market value of such security, then such dispute shall be resolved pursuant to Section 2(d)(iii) of the Certificate of Designations. All such determinations to be appropriately adjusted for any stock dividend, stock split, stock combination or other similar transaction during the applicable calculation period.


        12.
    Amendment and Restatement of Securities Purchase Agreement and Registration Rights Agreement.     The Company, Cano and the Series A Holders agree that the Securities Purchase Agreement and the Registration Rights Agreement are hereby amended and restated in their entirety by this Agreement and upon execution of this Agreement (i) the Securities Purchase Agreement and the Registration Rights Agreement shall be of no further force and effect, and (ii) all rights and obligations of Cano and the Series A Holders under the Securities Purchase Agreement and the Registration Rights Agreement shall be superseded by this Agreement; provided, however, that the Series A Holders shall retain any rights and remedies that they have under the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement or the Registration Rights Agreement, as applicable, as a direct result of any breach of the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement or the Registration Rights Agreement by Cano occurring prior to the Closing Date, including rights to indemnification thereunder.

13.   Miscellaneous.

        a.     A Person is deemed to be a holder of Registrable Securities whenever such Person owns or is deemed to own of record such Registrable Securities. If the Company receives conflicting instructions, notices or elections from two or more Persons with respect to the same Registrable Securities, the Company shall act upon the basis of instructions, notice or election received from the such record owner of such Registrable Securities.

        b.     Any notices, consents, waivers or other communications required or permitted to be given under the terms of this Agreement must be in writing and will be deemed to have been delivered: (i) upon receipt, when delivered personally; (ii) upon receipt, when sent by facsimile (provided confirmation of transmission is mechanically or electronically generated and kept on file by the sending party); or (iii) one Business Day after deposit with a nationally recognized overnight delivery service, in each case properly addressed to the party to receive the same. The addresses and facsimile numbers for such communications shall be:

F-21


Table of Contents

        If to a Series A Holder or Investor, to its address and facsimile number set forth on the Exhibit E attached hereto, with copies to such Series A Holder's or Investor's representatives as set forth on the Exhibit E, or to such other address and/or facsimile number and/or to the attention of such other Person as the recipient party has specified by written notice given to each other party pursuant to this Section. If to the Legal Counsel, to its address and facsimile number as specified by written notice given to the Company by the Required Holders upon designation of the Legal Counsel. Written confirmation of receipt (A) given by the recipient of such notice, consent, waiver or other communication, (B) mechanically or electronically generated by the sender's facsimile machine containing the time, date, recipient facsimile number and an image of the first page of such transmission or (C) provided by a courier or overnight courier service shall be rebuttable evidence of personal service, receipt by facsimile or receipt from a nationally recognized overnight delivery service in accordance with clause (i), (ii) or (iii) above, respectively.

        c.     Failure of any party to exercise any right or remedy under this Agreement or otherwise, or delay by a party in exercising such right or remedy, shall not operate as a waiver thereof.

        d.     All questions concerning the construction, validity, enforcement and interpretation of this Agreement shall be governed by the internal laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of law provision or rule (whether of the State of New York or any other jurisdictions) that would cause the application of the laws of any jurisdictions other than the State of New York. Each party hereby irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the state and federal courts sitting in the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, for the adjudication of any dispute hereunder or in connection herewith or with any transaction contemplated hereby or discussed herein, and hereby irrevocably waives, and agrees not to assert in any suit, action or proceeding, any claim that it is not personally subject to the jurisdiction of any such court, that such suit, action or proceeding is brought in an inconvenient forum or that the venue of such suit, action or proceeding is improper. Each party hereby irrevocably waives personal service of process and consents to process being served in any such suit, action or proceeding by mailing a copy thereof to such party at the address for such notices to it under this Agreement and agrees that such service shall constitute good and sufficient service of process and notice thereof. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to limit in any way any right to serve process in any manner permitted by law. If any provision of this Agreement shall be invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remainder of this Agreement in that jurisdiction or the validity or enforceability of any provision of this Agreement in any other jurisdiction. EACH PARTY HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ANY RIGHT IT MAY HAVE, AND AGREES NOT TO REQUEST, A JURY TRIAL FOR THE ADJUDICATION OF ANY DISPUTE HEREUNDER OR IN CONNECTION HEREWITH OR ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY TRANSACTION CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.

        e.     This Agreement, the other Transaction Documents (as defined in the Securities Purchase Agreement) and the instruments referenced herein and therein constitute the entire agreement among the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof. There are no restrictions, promises, warranties or undertakings, other than those set forth or referred to herein and therein. This Agreement, the other Transaction Documents and the instruments referenced herein and therein

F-22


Table of Contents

supersede all prior agreements and understandings among the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof.

        f.      Subject to the requirements of Section 9, this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the permitted successors and assigns of each of the parties hereto.

        g.     The headings in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and shall not limit or otherwise affect the meaning hereof.

        h.     This Agreement may be executed in identical counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement. This Agreement, once executed by a party, may be delivered to the other party hereto by facsimile transmission of a copy of this Agreement bearing the signature of the party so delivering this Agreement.

        i.      Each party shall do and perform, or cause to be done and performed, all such further acts and things, and shall execute and deliver all such other agreements, certificates, instruments and documents, as any other party may reasonably request in order to carry out the intent and accomplish the purposes of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby.

        j.      All consents and other determinations required to be made by the Investors pursuant to this Agreement shall be made, unless otherwise specified in this Agreement, by the Required Holders.

        k.     The language used in this Agreement will be deemed to be the language chosen by the parties to express their mutual intent and no rules of strict construction will be applied against any party.

        l.      This Agreement is intended for the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective permitted successors and assigns, and is not for the benefit of, nor may any provision hereof be enforced by, any other Person.

        m.    Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, no Series A Holder or holder of Registrable Securities shall be entitled to consequential, indirect or incidental damages hereunder. However, the foregoing shall not in any way limit a Series A Holder or holder of Registrable Securities from being reimbursed for its costs, fees or expenses, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and disbursements in connection with any of its rights and remedies hereunder.

        n.     The obligations of each Investor hereunder are several and not joint with the obligations of any other Investor, and no provision of this Agreement is intended to confer any obligations on any Investor vis-à-vis any other Investor. Nothing contained herein, and no action taken by any Investor pursuant hereto, shall be deemed to constitute the Investors as a partnership, an association, a joint venture or any other kind of entity, or create a presumption that the Investors are in any way acting in concert or as a group with respect to such obligations or the transactions contemplated herein.

        o.     Provisions of this Agreement may be amended and the observance thereof may be waived (either generally or in a particular instance and either retroactively or prospectively), only with the written consent of the Company and the Required Holders. Any amendment or waiver effected in accordance with this Section 13(o) shall be binding upon each Investor and holder of Registrable Securities, Cano and the Company. No such amendment shall be effective to the extent that it applies to less than all of the holders of the Registrable Securities then outstanding. No consideration shall be offered or paid to any Person to amend or consent to a waiver or modification of any provision of any of this Agreement unless the same consideration also is offered to all of the parties to this Agreement.

        p.     The parties agree that this Agreement shall automatically be effective on the Closing Date and not before such date. The parties agree that they shall have no rights or obligations under this Agreement until the Closing Date. If the Merger does not occur, this Agreement shall immediately and automatically be null and void and of no force and effect.

[Signature page follows]

F-23


Table of Contents

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each Series A Holder and the Company have caused their respective signature page to this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first written above.

    COMPANY:

 

 

RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ JOHN J. LENDRUM, III

John J. Lendrum, III
Chief Executive Officer

 

 

CANO:

 

 

CANO PETROLEUM INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ PHILLIP B. FEINER

Phillip B. Feiner
Vice President and General Counsel

F-24


Table of Contents

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each Series A Holder and the Company have caused their respective signature page to this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first written above.

    SERIES A HOLDERS:

 

 

D.E. SHAW LAMINAR PORTFOLIOS, L.L.C.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ W. TODD HUSKINSON

Name: W. Todd Huskinson
Title: Authorized Signatory

F-25


Table of Contents

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each Series A Holder and the Company have caused their respective signature page to this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first written above.

    SERIES A HOLDERS:

 

 

KELLOGG CAPITAL MARKETS LLC

 

 

By:

 

/s/ NICHOLAS CAPPELLERI

Name: Nicholas Cappelleri
Title: Director—Finance and Operations

F-26


Table of Contents

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each Series A Holder and the Company have caused their respective signature page to this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first written above.

    SERIES A HOLDERS:

 

 

Radcliffe SPC, LTD. for and on behalf of the Class A Segregated Portfolio
    By:   Radcliffe Capital Management, L.P.
    By:   RGC Management Company, LLC

 

 

By:

 

/s/ CHRIS HINKEL

Name: Chris Hinkel
Title: Managing Director

F-27


Table of Contents

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each Series A Holder and the Company have caused their respective signature page to this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first written above.

  SERIES A HOLDERS:
Investcorp Interlachen Multi-Strategy Master Fund Limited
By: Interlachen Capital Group LP, Authorized Signatory

 

By:

 

/s/ Gregg T. Colburn

         

      Name:   Gregg T. Colburn

      Title:   Authorized Signatory

F-28


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT A

CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES
AND RIGHTS OF SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
OF
RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC.

        See Exhibit 4.4 of the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Resaca Exploitation, Inc. filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, of which this proxy statement/prospectus is a part.

F-29


Table of Contents


EXHIBIT B

SELLING SHAREHOLDERS

        The shares of Common Stock being offered by the Selling Shareholders are those issuable to the Selling Shareholders upon conversion of the convertible preferred shares. For additional information regarding the issuance of those convertible preferred shares, see "Issuance of Series A Preferred Stock" above. We are registering the shares of Common Stock in order to permit the selling shareholders to offer the shares for resale from time to time. Except for [disclose shareholder relationships] and the ownership of certain shares of Common Stock and the convertible preferred shares, the selling shareholders have not had any material relationship with us within the past three years.

        The table below lists the Selling Shareholders and other information regarding the beneficial ownership of the shares of Common Stock by each of the Selling Shareholders. The second column lists the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by each Selling Shareholder, based on its ownership of the convertible preferred shares, as of                        , 2010, assuming conversion of all convertible preferred shares held by the selling shareholders on that date without regard to any limitations on conversions.

        The third column lists the shares of Common Stock being offered by this prospectus by the Selling Shareholders.

        In accordance with the terms of an investors rights agreement with the selling shareholders, this prospectus generally covers the resale of at least 130% of the maximum number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the convertible preferred shares as of the [first trading day TBD]. Because the conversion price of the convertible preferred shares may be adjusted, the number of shares that will actually be issued may be more or less than the number of shares being offered by this prospectus. The fourth column assumes the sale of all of the shares offered by the Selling Shareholders pursuant to this prospectus.

        Under the terms of the certificate of designations, a Selling Shareholder may not convert the preferred shares to the extent such conversion would cause such Selling Shareholder, together with its affiliates, to beneficially own a number of shares of Common Stock which would exceed a percentage specified by the Selling Shareholder of our then outstanding shares of Common Stock following such conversion, excluding for purposes of such determination shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the convertible preferred shares which have not been converted. The number of shares in the second column does not reflect this limitation. The Selling Shareholders may sell all, some or none of their shares in this offering. See "Plan of Distribution."

Name of Selling Shareholder
  Number of
Ordinary Shares
Owned Prior
to Offering
  Maximum Number
of Ordinary Shares
to be Sold
Pursuant to
this Prospectus
  Number of
Ordinary Shares
Owned After
Offering
 

[Series A Holder]

                0  

[Other Series A Holders]

                   


PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

        We are registering the shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the preferred shares to permit the resale of these shares of Common Stock by the holders of the preferred shares from time to time after the date of this prospectus. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale by the selling shareholders of the shares of Common Stock. We will bear all fees and expenses incident to our obligation to register the shares of Common Stock.

F-30


Table of Contents

        The selling shareholders may sell all or a portion of the shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by them and offered hereby from time to time directly or through one or more underwriters, broker-dealers or agents. If the shares of Common Stock are sold through underwriters or broker-dealers, the selling shareholders will be responsible for underwriting discounts or commissions or agent's commissions. The shares of Common Stock may be sold in one or more transactions at fixed prices, at prevailing market prices at the time of the sale, at varying prices determined at the time of sale, or at negotiated prices. These sales may be effected in transactions, which may involve crosses or block transactions,

        If the selling shareholders effect such transactions by selling shares of Common Stock to or through underwriters, broker-dealers or agents, such underwriters, broker-dealers or agents may receive commissions in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the selling shareholders or commissions from purchasers of the shares of Common Stock for whom they may act as agent or to whom they may sell as principal (which discounts, concessions or commissions as to particular underwriters, broker-dealers or agents may be in excess of those customary in the types of transactions involved). In connection with sales of the shares of Common Stock or otherwise, the selling shareholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers, which may in turn engage in short sales of the shares of Common Stock in the course of hedging in positions they assume. The selling shareholders may also sell shares of Common Stock short and deliver shares of Common Stock covered by this prospectus to close out short positions and to return borrowed shares in connection with such short sales. The selling shareholders may also loan or pledge shares of Common Stock to broker-dealers that in turn may sell such shares.

        The selling shareholders may pledge or grant a security interest in some or all of the preferred shares or shares of Common Stock owned by them and, if they default in the performance of their secured obligations, the pledgees or secured parties may offer and sell the shares of Common Stock from time to time pursuant to this prospectus or any amendment to this prospectus under

F-31


Table of Contents


Rule 424(b)(3) or other applicable provision of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), amending, if necessary, the list of selling shareholders to include, pursuant to prospectus amendment or prospectus supplement, the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest as selling shareholders under this prospectus. The selling shareholders also may transfer and donate the shares of Common Stock in other circumstances in which case the transferees, donees, pledgees or other successors in interest will be the selling beneficial owners for purposes of this prospectus.

        The selling shareholders and any broker-dealer participating in the distribution of the shares of Common Stock may be deemed to be "underwriters" within the meaning of the Securities Act, and any commission paid, or any discounts or concessions allowed to, any such broker-dealer may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. At the time a particular offering of the shares of Common Stock is made, a prospectus supplement, if required, will be distributed which will set forth the aggregate amount of shares of Common Stock being offered and the terms of the offering, including the name or names of any broker-dealers or agents, any discounts, commissions and other terms constituting compensation from the selling shareholders and any discounts, commissions or concessions allowed or reallowed or paid to broker-dealers.

        Under the securities laws of some states, the shares of Common Stock may be sold in such states only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. In addition, in some states the shares of Common Stock may not be sold unless such shares have been registered or qualified for sale in such state or an exemption from registration or qualification is available and is complied with.

        There can be no assurance that any selling shareholder will sell any or all of the shares of Common Stock registered pursuant to the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part.

        The selling shareholders and any other person participating in such distribution will be subject to applicable provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and the rules and regulations thereunder, including, without limitation, Regulation M of the Exchange Act, which may limit the timing of purchases and sales of any of the shares of Common Stock by the selling shareholders and any other participating person. Regulation M may also restrict the ability of any person engaged in the distribution of the shares of Common Stock to engage in market-making activities with respect to the shares of Common Stock. All of the foregoing may affect the marketability of the shares of Common Stock and the ability of any person or entity to engage in market-making activities with respect to the shares of Common Stock.

        We will pay all expenses of the registration of the shares of Common Stock pursuant to the investors rights agreement, estimated to be $ [                        ] in total, including, without limitation, Securities and Exchange Commission filing fees and expenses of compliance with state securities or "blue sky" laws; provided, however, that a selling shareholder will pay all underwriting discounts and selling commissions, if any. We will indemnify the selling shareholders against liabilities, including some liabilities under the Securities Act, in accordance with the registration rights agreements, or the selling shareholders will be entitled to contribution. We may be indemnified by the selling shareholders against civil liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, that may arise from any written information furnished to us by the selling shareholder specifically for use in this prospectus, in accordance with the related registration rights agreement, or we may be entitled to contribution.

        Once sold under the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part, the shares of Common Stock will be freely tradable in the hands of persons other than our affiliates.

F-32


Table of Contents


Exhibit C

FORM OF NOTICE OF EFFECTIVENESS
OF REGISTRATION STATEMENT

        Ladies and Gentlemen:

        [We are][I am] counsel to Resaca Exploitation, Inc., a Texas corporation (the "Company"), and have represented the Company in connection with that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") entered into by and among the Company, Resaca Acquisition Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Merger Sub"), and Cano Petroleum, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Cano"), pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue to the holders (the "Holders") of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock of Cano (the "Cano Preferred Stock") one (1) validly issued, fully paid nonassessable share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company for each share of Cano Preferred Stock. The Company also has agreed entered into an Investors Rights Agreement with the Holders (the "Investors Rights Agreement") pursuant to which the Company agreed, among other things, to register the Registrable Securities (as defined therein) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "1933 Act"). In connection with the Company's obligations under the Investors Rights Agreement, on                        , 2010, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-            ) (the "Registration Statement") with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") relating to the Registrable Securities which names each of the Holders as a selling shareholder thereunder.

        In connection with the foregoing, [we][I] advise you that a member of the SEC's staff has advised [us][me] by telephone that the SEC has entered an order declaring the Registration Statement effective under the 1933 Act at [ENTER TIME OF EFFECTIVENESS] on [ENTER DATE OF EFFECTIVENESS] and [we][I] have no knowledge, after telephonic inquiry of a member of the SEC's staff, that any stop order suspending its effectiveness has been issued or that any proceedings for that purpose are pending before, or threatened by, the SEC and the Registrable Securities are available for resale under the 1933 Act pursuant to the Registration Statement.

        Subject to the specific prohibitions contained in the Investors Rights Agreement regarding the inability to use the Registration Statement under specific circumstances (the "Registration Statement Limitations"), this letter shall serve as our standing instruction to you that the shares of Common Stock are freely transferable by the Holders pursuant to the Registration Statement provided the prospectus delivery requirements, if any, are complied with.

        Subject to the Registration Statement Limitations, you need not require further letters from us to effect any future legend-free issuance or reissuance of shares of Common Stock to the Holders as contemplated by the Company's Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instructions dated                        , 20        . This letter shall serve as our standing opinion with regard to this matter.

  Very truly yours,

 

[ISSUER'S COUNSEL]

 

By:

   
         

CC: [LIST NAMES OF HOLDERS]

       

F-33


Table of Contents


EXHIBIT D

IRREVOCABLE TRANSFER INSTRUCTIONS

RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC.


                                    , 20    

[Company Transfer Agent]
[Address]

Ladies and Gentlemen:

        In connection with the merger of a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resaca Exploitation, Inc., a Texas corporation (the "Company"), with and into Cano Petroleum, Inc., a Delaware corporation, the investors named on the Schedule of Holders attached hereto as Exhibit I (collectively, the "Holders") received Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, (the "Series A Preferred Shares") of the Company, which Series A Preferred Shares are convertible into the Company's common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Common Stock"), in accordance with the terms of the Certificate of Designations of the Series A Preferred Shares.

        This letter shall serve as our authorization and direction to you (provided that you are the transfer agent of the Company at such time), subject to any stop transfer instructions that we may issue to you from time to time, if at all, to issue shares of Common Stock upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Shares (the "Conversion Shares") to or upon the order of a Holder from time to time upon delivery to you of a properly completed and duly executed Conversion Notice, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit II, which has been acknowledged by the Company as indicated by the signature of a duly authorized officer of the Company thereon.

        You acknowledge and agree that so long as you have previously received (a) written confirmation from the General Counsel of the Company (or its outside legal counsel) that either (i) a registration statement covering resales of the Conversion Shares has been declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "1933 Act") and you have not received a notice from the Company that resale of the Conversion Shares under a registration statement are not permitted at that time (a "No Registered Resale Notice") pursuant to the terms of the Investors Rights Agreement dated as of            , 2010 by and among the Company and the Holders, or (ii) that sales of the Conversion Shares may be made in conformity with Rule 144 under the 1933 Act, and (b) if applicable, a copy of such registration statement and you have not received a No Registered Resale Notice, then, within three (3) business days after your receipt of a notice of transfer or a Conversion Notice, you shall issue the certificates representing the Conversion Shares and such certificates shall not bear any legend restricting transfer of the Conversion Shares thereby and should not be subject to any stop-transfer restriction; provided, however, that if such Conversion Shares are not registered for resale under the 1933 Act or able to be sold under Rule 144, then the certificates for such Conversion Shares shall bear the following legend:

F-34


Table of Contents

        A form of written confirmation from the General Counsel of the Company or the Company's outside legal counsel that a registration statement covering resales of the Conversion Shares has been declared effective by the SEC under the 1933 Act is attached hereto as Exhibit III.

        Please execute this letter in the space indicated to acknowledge your agreement to act in accordance with these instructions. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at (817) 869-1062.

      Very truly yours,

 

 

 

RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC.

 

 

 

By:

 

 
         
Phillip B. Feiner
Corporate Secretary, Vice President and
General Counsel


THE FOREGOING INSTRUCTIONS ARE
ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO
this            day of                                    , 2010
[Company Transfer agent]


 


 


 


 


 

By:        
   
 
   
Name:        
   
 
   
Title:        
   
 
   

Enclosures

 

 
cc:
[Legal Counsel]

F-35


Table of Contents


EXHIBIT I

SCHEDULE OF SERIES A HOLDERS

Name of Series A Holder
  Series A Holder Address and Facsimile Number
D. E. Shaw Laminar Portfolios LLC   c/o D E Shaw & Co
120 West 45th Street, 39th Floor
New York, NY 10036
Facsimile: 212.845.1628

William Herbert Hunt Trust Estate

 

1601 Elm Street, Suite 3400
Dallas, TX 75201
Facsimile: 214.880.7101

Investcorp Interlachen Multi-Strategy Master Fund Limited

 

800 Nicollet Mall, Suite 2500
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Facsimile: 612.659.4457 or 612.659.4401

Investor Company

 

c/o TD Waterhouse Investor Services, Inc.
77 Bloor St., West 3rd Floor
Toronto, Ontario M4Y 1A9
Facsimile: 416.413.3613

Kellogg Capital Group LLC

 

55 Broadway, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10006
Facsimile: 212.380.5665

O'Connor Global Multi-Strategy Alpha Master Limited

 

c/o UBS O'Connor LLC
1 North Wacker Dr, 32nd Floor
Chicago, IL 60606
Facsimile: 312.525.6271

Radcliffe SPC, Ltd. for and on behalf of the Class A Segregated Portfolio

 

c/o Radcliffe Capital Management, L.P.
Attn: Chris Hinkel
50 Monument Road, Suite 300
Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
Facsimile: 610.617.0580

Beth Rose

 

c/o TD Waterhouse Canada Inc.
282 Lakeshore Rd E, Main Floor
Oakville, Ontario L6J 5B2
Facsimile: 905.337.3796

Dundee Securities Corp.

 

1 Adelaide St E, Ste 2700
Toronto, Ontario M5C 2V9
Facsimile: 416.849.7898

Gundyco

 

161 Bay St 10th Floor
Toronto, Ontario M5J 2S8
Facsimile: 416-594-8749

Brant Investments Limited EIF

 

Brant Investments Limited
c/o Royal Bank Plaza North Tower
200 Bay St., 21st Floor
Toronto, Ontario M5J 2J5
Facsimile: 416.955.6518

F-36


Table of Contents

Name of Series A Holder
  Series A Holder Address and Facsimile Number
Bansco & Co. ITF John Hogan   40 King St. W
23rd Floor Scotia Plaza
Toronto, Ontario M5H 1H1
Facsimile: 416.945.4339

Scotia Capital, Inc.

 

40 King St. W
23rd Floor Scotia Plaza
Toronto, Ontario M5H 1H1
Facsimile: 416.945.4339

MacDougall, MacDougall & MacTier, Inc.

 

Place Du Canada
1010 De La Gauchetiere West, Ste 2000
Montreal, Quebec H3B 4J1
Facsimile: 514.871.9254

Bansco & Co. for Nancy Hogan.

 

40 King St. W
23rd Floor Scotia Plaza
Toronto, Ontario M5H 1H1
Facsimile: 416.945.4339

Jeff Johnson

 

Burnett Plaza
801 Cherry Street, Suite 3200
Fort Worth, TX 76102
Facsimile: 817.698.0762

GMP Securities LP

 

145 King Street
Suite 1100
Toronto, Ontario M5H 1J8
Facsimile:

GMP Securities LP ITF Donald Cook Carlisle Family Trust

 

145 King Street
Suite 1100
Toronto, Ontario M5H 1J8
Facsimile:

Raymond James LTD ITF Elaine Wilco A/C 1CR-NVVR-0

 

925 W. Georgia Street
Suite 2200
Vancouver, BC V6C 3L2
Facsimile:

F-37


Table of Contents


EXHIBIT II

RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC. CONVERSION NOTICE

        Reference is made to the Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of Resaca Exploitation, Inc. (the "Certificate of Designations"). In accordance with and pursuant to the Certificate of Designations, the undersigned hereby elects to convert the number of shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Preferred Shares"), of Resaca Exploitation, Inc., a Texas corporation (the "Company"), indicated below into shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Common Stock"), of the Company, as of the date specified below.

 

Date of Conversion:

   

 

 

Number of Preferred Shares to be converted:

   

 

 

Stock certificate no(s). of Preferred Shares to be converted:

   

 

 

Tax ID Number (If applicable):

   

 

Please confirm the following information:

   

 

 

Conversion Price:

   

 

 

Number of shares of Common Stock to be issued:

   

        Please issue the Common Stock into which the Preferred Shares are being converted in the following name and to the following address:

 

Issue to:

   
 

    

   
       

 

 

Address:

   

 

 

Telephone Number:

   

 

 

Facsimile Number:

   

 

 

Authorization:

   

 

 

By:

   

 

 

Title:

   

 

 

Dated:

   

 

 

Account Number (if electronic book entry transfer):

   

 

 

Transaction Code Number (if electronic book entry transfer):

   

        [NOTE TO HOLDER—THIS FORM MUST BE SENT CONCURRENTLY TO COMPANY TRANSFER AGENT]

F-38


Table of Contents

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

        The Company hereby acknowledges this Conversion Notice and hereby instructs [Company Transfer Agent] to issue the above indicated number of shares of Common Stock in accordance with the Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instructions dated                        , 20            from the Company and acknowledged and agreed to by [Company Transfer Agent].

  RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC.

 

By:

   

 

Name:

   

 

Title:

   

F-39


Table of Contents


EXHIBIT III

FORM OF NOTICE OF EFFECTIVENESS
OF REGISTRATION STATEMENT

[Company Transfer Agent]
[Address]
Attention:

Ladies and Gentlemen:

        [We are][I am] counsel to Resaca Exploitation, Inc., a Texas corporation (the "Company"), and have represented the Company in connection with that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated September 25, 2009 (the "Merger Agreement"), entered into by and among the Company, Cano Petroleum, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Cano"), and Resaca Acquisition Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Merger Sub"), pursuant to which the Company issued to the holders of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock of Cano (collectively, the "Holders") Series A Convertible Preferred Stock , par value $0.01 per share, of the Company (the "Preferred Shares") which are convertible into the Company's common stock, $0.01 par value (the "Common Stock"). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Company also has entered into an Investors Rights Agreement with the Holders (the "Investors Rights Agreement") pursuant to which the Company agreed, among other things, to register the Registrable Securities (as defined in the Investors Rights Agreement) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "1933 Act"). In connection with the Company's obligations under the Investors Rights Agreement, on                                                 , 2010, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-                                    ) (the "Registration Statement") with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") relating to the Registrable Securities which names each of the Holders as a selling stockholder thereunder.

        In connection with the foregoing, [we][I] advise you that a member of the SEC's staff has advised [us][me] by telephone that the SEC has entered an order declaring the Registration Statement effective under the 1933 Act at [ENTER TIME OF EFFECTIVENESS] on [ENTER DATE OF EFFECTIVENESS] and [we][I] have no knowledge, after telephonic inquiry of a member of the SEC's staff, that any stop order suspending its effectiveness has been issued or that any proceedings for that purpose are pending before, or threatened by, the SEC and the Registrable Securities are available for resale under the 1933 Act pursuant to the Registration Statement.

        Subject to the specific prohibitions contained in the Investors Rights Agreement regarding the inability to use the Registration Statement under specific circumstances (the "Registration Statement Limitations"), this letter shall serve as our standing instruction to you that the shares of Common Stock are freely transferable by the Holders pursuant to the Registration Statement provided the prospectus delivery requirements, if any, are complied with. Subject to the Registration Statement Limitations, you need not require further letters from us to effect any future legend-free issuance or reissuance of shares of Common Stock to the Holders as contemplated by the Company's Irrevocable Transfer Agent Instructions dated                        , 20            . This letter shall serve as our standing opinion with regard to this matter.

  Very truly yours,

 

[ISSUER'S COUNSEL]

 

By:

   

CC: [LIST NAMES OF HOLDERS]

       

F-40


Table of Contents


EXHIBIT E

SCHEDULE OF SERIES A HOLDERS

Name of Series A Holder
  Series A Holder Address
and Facsimile Number
  Maximum
Ownership
Percentage
 
D. E. Shaw Laminar Portfolios LLC   c/o D E Shaw & Co
120 West 45th Street, 39th Floor
New York, NY 10036
Facsimile: 212.845.1628
    9.99 %

William Herbert Hunt Trust Estate

 

1601 Elm Street, Suite 3400
Dallas, TX 75201
Facsimile: 214.880.7101

 

 

9.99

%

Investcorp Interlachen Multi-Strategy Master Fund Limited

 

800 Nicollet Mall, Suite 2500
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Facsimile: 612.659.4457 or
612.659.4401

 

 

9.99

%

Investor Company

 

c/o TD Waterhouse Investor Services, Inc.
77 Bloor St., West 3rd Floor
Toronto, Ontario M4Y 1A9
Facsimile: 416.413.3613

 

 

9.99

%

Kellogg Capital Group LLC

 

55 Broadway, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10006
Facsimile: 212.380.5665

 

 

9.99

%

O'Connor Global Multi-Strategy Alpha Master Limited

 

c/o UBS O'Connor LLC
1 North Wacker Dr, 32nd Floor
Chicago, IL 60606
Facsimile: 312.525.6271

 

 

9.99

%

Radcliffe SPC, Ltd. for and on behalf of the Class A Segregated Portfolio

 

c/o Radcliffe Capital Management, L.P.
Attn: Chris Hinkel
50 Monument Road, Suite 300
Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
Facsimile: 610.617.0580

 

 

4.99

%

Beth Rose

 

c/o TD Waterhouse Canada Inc.
282 Lakeshore Rd E, Main Floor
Oakville, Ontario L6J 5B2
Facsimile: 905.337.3796

 

 

9.99

%

Dundee Securities Corp.

 

1 Adelaide St E, Ste 2700
Toronto, Ontario M5C 2V9
Facsimile: 416.849.7898

 

 

9.99

%

Gundyco

 

161 Bay St 10th Floor
Toronto, Ontario M5J 2S8
Facsimile: 416-594-8749

 

 

9.99

%

F-41


Table of Contents

Name of Series A Holder
  Series A Holder Address
and Facsimile Number
  Maximum
Ownership
Percentage
 
Brant Investments Limited EIF   Brant Investments Limited
c/o Royal Bank Plaza North Tower
200 Bay St., 21st Floor
Toronto, Ontario M5J 2J5
Facsimile: 416.955.6518
    9.99 %

Bansco & Co. ITF John Hogan

 

40 King St. W
23rd Floor Scotia Plaza
Toronto, Ontario M5H 1H1
Facsimile: 416.945.4339

 

 

9.99

%

Scotia Capital, Inc.

 

40 King St. W
23rd Floor Scotia Plaza
Toronto, Ontario M5H 1H1
Facsimile: 416.945.4339

 

 

9.99

%

MacDougall, MacDougall & MacTier, Inc.

 

Place Du Canada
1010 De La Gauchetiere West, Ste 2000
Montreal, Quebec H3B 4J1
Facsimile: 514.871.9254

 

 

9.99

%

Bansco & Co. for Nancy Hogan.

 

40 King St. W
23rd Floor Scotia Plaza
Toronto, Ontario M5H 1H1
Facsimile: 416.945.4339

 

 

9.99

%

Jeff Johnson

 

Burnett Plaza
801 Cherry Street, Suite 3200
Fort Worth, TX 76102
Facsimile: 817.698.0762

 

 

No limit

 

GMP Securities LP

 

145 King Street
Suite 1100
Toronto, Ontario M5H 1J8
Facsimile:                             

 

 

9.99

%

GMP Securities LP ITF Donald Cook Carlisle Family Trust

 

145 King Street
Suite 1100
Toronto, Ontario M5H 1J8
Facsimile:                             

 

 

9.99

%

Raymond James LTD ITF Elaine Wilco A/C 1CR-NVVR-0

 

925 W. Georgia Street
Suite 2200
Vancouver, BC V6C 3L2
Facsimile:                             

 

 

9.99

%

F-42


Table of Contents


ANNEX G


GLOSSARY OF OIL AND GAS TERMS

"bbl"   a barrel which is equivalent to 42 US gallons

"behind pipe"

 

reserves which are expected to be recovered from zones in existing wells that will require additional completion work or future recompletion prior to the start of production

"boe"

 

one barrel of oil equivalent, determined using a ratio of six Mcf of natural gas to one bbl of crude oil, condensate or natural gas liquids

"CO2"

 

carbon dioxide

"CO2 flooding"

 

an enhanced oil recovery technique where CO2 is injected into the oil formation. The CO2 acts as a solvent that releases the oil from porous rock and causes it to flow more freely to the well head, increasing recovery rates

"development well"

 

a well drilled within the proved area of an oil or natural gas reservoir to the depth of a stratigraphic horizon known to be productive

"exploitation"

 

a drilling or other project which may target proven or unproven reserves (such as probable or possible reserves), but which generally has a lower risk than that associated with exploration projects

"field"

 

an area consisting of a single reservoir or multiple reservoirs all grouped on or related to the same individual geological structural feature and/or stratigraphic condition

"fishing tool"

 

a general term for special mechanical devices used to aid the recovery of equipment lost downhole

"fracturing" or "frac"

 

an operation in which a specially blended liquid is pumped down a well and into a formation under pressure high enough to cause the formation to crack open, forming passages through which oil can flow into the wellbore, also referred to as hydraulic fracturing

"gross acres or gross wells"

 

the total acres or wells, as the case may be, in which a working interest is owned

"infill well"

 

a well drilled into the same pool as known producing wells so that oil or gas does not have to travel as far through the formation

"injection well"

 

a well in which fluids are injected rather than produced, the primary objective typically being to maintain reservoir pressure

"MBbls"

 

one thousand barrels of crude oil or other liquid hydrocarbons

"MBoe"

 

one thousand barrels of crude oil equivalent, using a ratio of six Mcf of natural gas to one Bbl of crude oil, condensate or natural gas liquids

"Mcf"

 

one thousand cubic feet

G-1


Table of Contents

"MMBoe"   one million barrels of crude oil equivalent, using a ratio of six Mcf of natural gas to one bbl of crude oil, condensate or natural gas liquids

"MMBTU"

 

one million British Thermal Units

"MMcf"

 

one million cubic feet

"Net acres" or "net wells"

 

the sum of the fractional working interests owned in gross acres or gross wells, as the case may be

"NYMEX"

 

New York Mercantile Exchange

"NGL" or "NGLs"

 

natural gas liquids

"oil"

 

crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids

"original oil in place"

 

the total oil resource base without regard to recoverability

"PDP"

 

proved developed producing

"possible reserves"

 

additional reserves which analysis of geoscience and engineering data indicate are less likely to be recoverable that probable reserves

"probable reserves"

 

additional reserves which analysis of geoscience and engineering data indicate are less likely to be recovered than proved reserves but more certain to be recovered than possible reserves

"proved developed reserves"

 

reserves that can be expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Additional oil and natural gas expected to be obtained through the application of fluid injection or other improved recovery techniques for supplementing the natural forces and mechanisms of primary recovery are included in "proved developed reserves" only after testing by a pilot project or after the operation of an installed program has confirmed through production response that increased recovery will be achieved

"proved developed non-producing" or "PDNP"

 

proved oil and natural gas reserves that are developed behind pipe, shut-in or can be recovered through improved recovery only after the necessary equipment has been installed, and when the costs to do so are relatively minor. Shut-in reserves are expected to be recovered from (1) completion intervals which are open at the time of the estimate but which have not started producing, (2) wells that were shut-in for market conditions or pipeline connections, or (3) wells not capable of production for mechanical reasons

"proved reserves"

 

those quantities of petroleum, which by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be commercially recoverable, from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under defined economic conditions, operating methods and government regulations

G-2


Table of Contents

"proved undeveloped reserves" or "PUD"   proved oil and natural gas reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion. Reserves on undrilled acreage shall be limited to those drilling units offsetting productive units that are reasonably certain of production when drilled. Proved reserves for other undrilled units can be claimed only where it can be demonstrated with certainty that there is continuity of production from the existing productive formation. Under no circumstances should estimates for proved undeveloped reserves be attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless such techniques have been proved effective by actual tests in the area and in the same reservoir

"recompletion"

 

the completion for production of an existing wellbore in another formation from that which the well has been previously completed

"re-fracturing" or "re-frac"

 

an operation in which a formation that had previously been fractured using a fracturing operation is fractured again, typically using different techniques or specifications than the original fracturing operation

"reservoir"

 

a porous and permeable underground formation containing a natural accumulation of producible oil and/or natural gas that is confined by impermeable rock or water barriers and is individual and separate from other reservoirs

"secondary recovery"

 

the second stage of hydrocarbon production during which an external fluid such as water or gas is injected into the reservoir through injection wells located in rock that has fluid communication with production wells. The purpose of secondary recovery is to maintain reservoir pressure and to displace hydrocarbons toward the wellbore

"shut-in well"

 

a well which is capable of producing but is shut so that it is not currently producing

"swivel"

 

a mechanical device that must simultaneously suspend the weight of the drillstring, provide for rotation of the drillstring beneath it while keeping the upper portion stationary, and permit high-volume flow of high-pressure drilling mud from the fixed portion to the rotating portion without leaking

"tertiary recovery"

 

the third stage of hydrocarbon production during which sophisticated techniques that alter the original properties of the oil are used. Tertiary oil recovery can begin after a secondary recovery process or at any time during the productive life of an oil reservoir. Its purpose is not only to restore formation pressure, but also to improve oil displacement or fluid flow in the reservoir

G-3


Table of Contents

"waterflood"   a method of secondary recovery in which water is injected into the reservoir formation to displace residual oil. The water from injection wells physically sweeps the displaced oil to adjacent production wells

"working interest"

 

the operating interest that gives the owner the right to drill, produce and conduct operating activities on the property and a share of production

"workover"

 

operations on a producing well to restore or increase production

G-4


Table of Contents


Annex H


ASSET TRANSFER AGREEMENT

by and between


PERMIAN BASIN WELL SERVICES, LLC
(TRANSFEROR)

and

RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC.
(TRANSFEREE)


Table of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ARTICLE 1—DEFINITIONS

  H-1

ARTICLE 2—AGREEMENT TO CONVEY

  H-3

ARTICLE 3—TRANSFER PRICE AND PAYMENT

  H-4
 

3.1

 

Transfer Price

  H-4
 

3.2

 

Allocation of Transfer Price

  H-4

ARTICLE 4—TRANSFEROR'S REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

  H-5

ARTICLE 5—TRANSFEREE'S REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

  H-7

ARTICLE 6—ACCESS TO INFORMATION AND INSPECTIONS

  H-8
 

6.1

 

Title Files

  H-8
 

6.2

 

Personal Property Files

  H-8
 

6.3

 

Inspections

  H-9

ARTICLE 7—TITLE

  H-9
 

7.1

 

Title to Assets

  H-9
 

7.2

 

Conveyance

  H-9

ARTICLE 8—TRANSFER OF SHARES TO TORCH E&P

  H-9

ARTICLE 9—CLOSING

  H-10
 

9.1

 

Closing

  H-10
 

9.2

 

Transferor's Closing Obligations

  H-10
 

9.3

 

Transferee's Closing Obligations

  H-10

ARTICLE 10—ASSUMPTION AND INDEMNITY

  H-10
 

10.1

 

Transferor's Indemnity Obligation

  H-10
 

10.2

 

Transferee's Indemnity Obligation

  H-10
 

10.3

 

Extent of Indemnification

  H-10
 

10.4

 

Indemnity Procedures

  H-11

ARTICLE 11—MISCELLANEOUS

  H-11
 

11.1

 

Public Announcements

  H-11
 

11.2

 

Filing and Recording of Assignments, etc.

  H-12
 

11.3

 

Further Assurances and Records

  H-12
 

11.4

 

Notices

  H-12
 

11.5

 

Incidental Expenses

  H-13
 

11.6

 

Waiver

  H-13
 

11.7

 

Binding Effect

  H-13
 

11.8

 

Taxes

  H-13
 

11.9

 

Governing Law

  H-14
 

11.10

 

Entire Agreement

  H-14
 

11.11

 

Severability

  H-14
 

11.12

 

Exhibits

  H-14
 

11.13

 

Survival

  H-14
 

11.14

 

Counterparts

  H-14
 

11.15

 

Subrogation

  H-15
 

11.16

 

No Third-Party Beneficiaries

  H-15

H-i


Table of Contents


EXHIBITS

  Exhibit "A"   Personal Property
  Exhibit "B"   Real Property
  Exhibit "C"   Allocated Values
  Exhibit "D"   Warranty Deed
  Exhibit "E"   Bill of Sale

H-ii


Table of Contents


ASSET TRANSFER AGREEMENT

        This Asset Transfer Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into on this the 6th day of July, 2009, by and between Permian Basin Well Services, LLC, a Texas limited liability company ("Permian Basin"), and Resaca Exploitation, Inc., a Texas corporation ("Resaca"). Permian Basin is sometimes hereinafter referred to as "Transferor" and Resaca is sometimes hereinafter referred to as "Transferee." Permian Basin and Resaca are sometimes together referred to herein individually as a "Party" or collectively as "Parties."


R E C I T A L S

        WHEREAS, Permian Basin owns certain real property, mobile workover rigs and related assets more fully described on the exhibits attached hereto; and

        WHEREAS, Permian Basin desires to transfer and Resaca desires to acquire Permian Basin's real property, mobile workover rigs and related assets on the terms and conditions hereinafter provided;

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency are hereby acknowledged, Permian Basin and Resaca do hereby agree as follows:


ARTICLE 1—DEFINITIONS

        As used in this Agreement, certain defined and capitalized terms shall have the meaning as set forth in this Article 1 or provided elsewhere in this Agreement.

        1.1   "Act" shall be as defined in Article 4(l).

        1.2   "Agreement" shall mean this Asset Transfer Agreement between the Parties first set forth above.

        1.3   "Allocated Value" shall mean the dollar amount allocated to the Assets as set forth on Exhibit "C."

        1.4   "Assets" shall mean all of Permian Basin's legal and beneficial right, title and interest in and to the Personal Property and Real Property (except as may constitute Excluded Assets) as described herein.

        1.5   "Assumed Obligations" shall mean with respect to the Assets, all liabilities, duties, and obligations that arise out of the ownership, operation or use of the Assets after the Effective Time. The Assumed Obligations shall expressly not include the Retained Obligations, including the Huerta Litigation, or any other liabilities or obligations of Permian Basin described in Section 2.2.

        1.6   "Bill of Sale" shall be as defined in Section 7.2(b).

        1.7   "Claims" means any and all claims, demands, suits, causes of action, losses, damages, liabilities, fines, penalties and costs (including attorneys' fees and costs of litigation).

        1.8   "Closing" shall be as defined in Section 9.1.

        1.9   "Closing Date" shall be as defined in Section 9.1.

        1.10 "Common Stock" means common stock, par value $0.01, per share, of Resaca.

        1.11 "Effective Time" shall mean 7:00 a.m., Central Standard Time, on the first day of July, 2009.

        1.12 "Environmental Obligations" shall mean all liabilities, obligations, expenses (including, without limitation, all attorneys' fees), fines, penalties, costs, claims, suits or damages (including natural resource damages) of any nature, associated with the Assets, and attributable to or resulting

H-1


Table of Contents


from: (a) pollution or contamination of soil, surface water, groundwater or air, on, in, by, from or under the Assets or lands in the vicinity thereof, and any other contamination of or adverse effect upon the environment; (b) clean-up responses, remedial, control or compliance costs, including the required cleanup or remediation of spills, pits, lakes, ponds, or lagoons, including any subsurface or surface pollution caused by such spills, pits, lakes, ponds, or lagoons; (c) noncompliance with applicable land use, permitting, surface disturbance, licensing or notification requirements, including those in a surface or mineral lease, whether an express or implied obligation; (d) violation of any federal, state or local environmental law or land use law; and (e); any and all indemnity obligations of Transferor with respect to the above, along with any and all Claims against Transferor for indemnity with respect to the foregoing.

        1.13 "Equitable Limitations" shall be as defined in Article 4(c).

        1.14 "Exchange Act" shall be as defined in Article 4(x).

        1.15 "Excluded Assets" shall mean the following:

        (a)   all corporate, financial, and tax records of Permian Basin, and those records subject to attorney/client privilege; however, Transferee shall be entitled to receive copies of any tax records which directly relate to any Assumed Obligations, or which are necessary for Resaca's ownership, administration, or operation of the Assets;

        (b)   all Claims and causes of action of Permian Basin arising from acts, omissions or events, or damage to or destruction of the Assets, occurring prior to the Effective Time;

        (c)   all rights, titles, claims and interests of Permian Basin relating to the Assets prior to the Effective Time (i) under any policy or agreement of insurance or indemnity; (ii) under any bond; or (iii) to any insurance or condemnation proceeds or awards; and

        (d)   all of Permian Basin's intellectual property, including, but not limited to, proprietary computer software, patents, trade secrets, copyrights, names, marks and logos.

        1.16 "Huerta Litigation" means (i) the lawsuit styled Maryuri Castilla, individually and as representative of the Estate of Erineo G. Huerta, deceased and as next friend of Bridgette Huerta, a minor child, Beronica Lujan as next friend of Alexandra M. Huerta, a minor child, Zoila Galindo as next friend of Priscila Huerta, a minor child, Eugenia C. Rodriguez as next friend of Erika Huerta and Clarissa Huerta, minor children, and Antonio Huerta and Marina Huerta vs. Permian Basin Well Services LLC, Permian Basin Well Services, LP and Torch Energy Services, Inc. Defendants, Cause No. 5881 in the District Court, 109th Judicial District, Crane County, Texas; and (ii) any Claims related to the lawsuit listed in subsection (i) or the events which are the subject or basis of the lawsuit listed in subsection (i).

        1.17 "Indemnity Claim Notice" shall be as defined in Section 10.4.

        1.18 "Lock-in Agreement" means that certain Lock-in and Orderly Marketing Deed, dated July 16, 2008, by and among Resaca, Seymour Pierce Limited, Royal Bank of Canada Europe Limited and Torch E&P.

        1.19 "Notice Period" shall be as defined in Section 10.4.

        1.20 "Permian Basin" shall be as defined in the opening paragraph of this Agreement.

        1.21 "Personal Property" shall mean all legal and beneficial right, title and interest of Permian in and to the following, insofar as the same do not constitute Excluded Assets:

        (a)   the workover rigs, reverse units/tank, power swivels, vehicles (trucks, trailers, construction equipment), shop equipment, and related equipment, all of which is more fully described in Exhibit "A," including without limitation, fishing tools, machinery, spare parts, tools, fire equipment, supplies, other ancillary tools and equipment, and all other equipment and tangible personal property

H-2


Table of Contents


that as of the date of this Agreement relate to or are used in connection with the workover rigs, reverse units/tank, power swivels, vehicles, (trucks, trailers and construction equipment), shop equipment, and related equipment identified on Exhibit "A"; and

        (b)   originals of all books and files relating to the workover rigs, reverse units/tank, power swivels, vehicles, (trucks, trailers and construction equipment), shop equipment, and related equipment including, without limitation, all instruction, maintenance and repair manuals, maintenance and repair logs, mileage records or logs, all warranties from the various manufacturers of the component parts of the workover rigs, reverse units/tank, power swivels, vehicles (trucks, trailers and construction equipment), shop equipment, and related equipment.

        1.22 "Party" and "Parties" shall be as defined in the opening paragraph of this Agreement.

        1.23 "Real Property" shall mean all legal and beneficial right, title and interest of Permian Basin in and to the following, insofar as the same do not constitute Excluded Assets:

        (a)   All real property, land, buildings, structures, fixtures, stations, facilities, improvements, easements, rights-of-way, and other rights and interests in and to real property and appurtenances owned by Transferor as more described in Exhibit "B".

        1.24 "Resaca" shall be as defined in the opening paragraph of this Agreement.

        1.25 "Retained Obligations" shall mean:

        (a)   Claims of any nature or kind including, without limitation, personal injury or wrongful death relating to or arising from the Assets occurring prior to the Effective Time;

        (b)   all Environmental Obligations whether attributed to, or arising from, events occurring before the Effective Time;

        (c)   except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, all other liabilities, duties, and obligations that arise out of the ownership, operation or use of the Assets prior to the Effective Time; and

        (d)   the Huerta Litigation.

        1.26 "SEC" shall be as defined in Article 4(l).

        1.27 "Shares" shall be as defined in Section 3.1.

        1.28 "Torch E&P" means Torch E & P Company, a Delaware corporation.

        1.29 "Torch Share Transfer" shall be as defined in Article 8.

        1.30 "Transferee" shall be as defined in the opening paragraph of this Agreement.

        1.31 "Transferor" shall be as defined in the opening paragraph of this Agreement.

        1.32 "Transfer Price" shall be as defined in Section 3.1.

        1.33 "Warranty Deed'' shall be as defined in Section 7.2(a).


ARTICLE 2—AGREEMENT TO CONVEY

        2.1   Purchase of Assets and Assumption of Assumed Obligations.

        Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Permian Basin agrees to assign, transfer and convey to Resaca and Resaca agrees to acquire and pay for the Assets and to assume the Assumed Obligations.

H-3


Table of Contents

        2.2   Retained Obligations.

        Except for the Assumed Obligations, Resaca does not assume and is not in any way liable or responsible for any liabilities or obligations of Permian Basin or its affiliates; it being expressly acknowledged that it is the intention of the Parties hereto that the Retained Obligations and any other liabilities that Permian Basin has as of the date hereof or may have in the future, whether fixed or contingent, whether known or unknown, and not expressly described in the definition of Assumed Obligations shall remain the liabilities of Permian Basin.

        2.3   Shareholder Approval.

        The obligation of Resaca to acquire and pay for the Assets is expressly subject to and condition upon Resaca obtaining shareholder approval of the transactions contemplated herein at its next annual shareholders meeting which shall occur after the Closing. In the event that Resaca's shareholders do not approve the transactions contemplated herein, Resaca shall promptly re-convey the Assets to Permian Basin free and clear of any and all liens and encumbrances and Resaca shall reasonably compensate Permian Basin for the use of the Assets during the time period in which Resaca has ownership thereof. The compensation to be paid to Permian Basin shall be an amount mutually agreeable between the Parties, but in no event shall such compensation be greater than the industry accepted price for any such services during the time period in which Resaca has use of the Assets. Simultaneous with the re-conveyance of the Assets to Permian Basin by Resaca, Permian Basin shall transfer and deliver to Resaca all of the Shares free and clear of any and all liens and encumbrances.


ARTICLE 3—TRANSFER PRICE AND PAYMENT

        3.1  Transfer Price.

        In consideration for the transfer, assignment and conveyance of the Assets to Resaca, subject to the terms and conditions hereof, Resaca agrees to tender and deliver to Permian Basin, in the manner hereinafter provided, a number of shares of Common Stock, which is equal to the aggregate value of the Assets, which the Parties agree is equal to One Million Six Hundred Four Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety-Five Dollars and 00/100 ($1,604,995) minus $11,275.00 for state, local and federal property and ad valorem taxes associated with the Real Property (the "Transfer Price"). Resaca will issue and deliver to Permian Basin at Closing 3,320,250 shares of Common Stock (the "Shares"), which number was determined by dividing the Transfer Price by the July 6, 2009 closing stock price on the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange for Common Stock of .295 British pounds and an assumed exchange rate of 1.627 for a price per United States dollar of 48 cents per share.

        3.2  Allocation of Transfer Price.

        Concurrent with the execution of this Agreement, Transferor and Transferee will agree upon an allocation of the Transfer Price among the Assets, in compliance with the principles of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the Treasury regulations thereunder. Such allocation of value shall be attached to and incorporated in this Agreement as Exhibit "C." After Transferor and Transferee have agreed on the Allocated Values for the Assets, Transferor will be deemed to have accepted such Allocated Values for purposes of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby, but otherwise makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of such values. Transferor and Transferee agree (i) that the Allocated Values shall be used by Transferor and Transferee as the basis for reporting asset values and other items for purposes of all federal, state, and local tax returns, including without limitation Internal Revenue Service Form 8594 and (ii) that neither they nor their affiliates will take positions inconsistent with the Allocated Values in notices to government authorities or in audit or other proceedings with respect to taxes.

H-4


Table of Contents


ARTICLE 4—TRANSFEROR'S REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

        Permian Basin represents and warrants to Resaca as of the date hereof, and the Closing Date that:

        (a)   Permian Basin is a limited liability company duly organized, validly existing, and in good standing under the laws of the State of Texas.

        (b)   Permian Basin has full power and authority to carry on its business as presently conducted, to enter into this Agreement and to perform its obligations under this Agreement. The execution and delivery of this Agreement has been, and the performance of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby shall be, at the time required to be performed hereunder, duly and validly authorized by all requisite action on the part of Permian Basin.

        (c)   This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered on behalf of Permian Basin, and constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of Permian Basin enforceable in accordance with its terms, except as enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, reorganization or moratorium statues, or other similar laws affecting the rights of creditors generally or equitable principles (collectively, "Equitable Limitations"). At the Closing, all documents and instruments required hereunder to be executed and delivered by Permian Basin shall be duly executed and delivered and shall constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Permian Basin enforceable in accordance with their terms, except as enforceability may be limited by Equitable Limitations.

        (d)   The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Permian Basin does not, and the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall not, (a) violate or be in conflict with, or require the consent of any person or entity under, any provisions of Permian Basin's organizational or governing documents, (b) conflict with, result in a breach of, constitute a default (or an event that with the lapse of time or notice, or both would constitute a default) under any agreement or instrument to which Permian Basin is a party or by which any of the Assets owned by Permian Basin is bound, (c) violate any provision of or require any consent, authorization, or approval under any judgment, decree, judicial or administrative order, award, write, injunction, statute, rule or regulation applicable to Permian Basin, or (d) result in the creation of any lien, charge or encumbrance of any of the Assets owned by Permian Basin.

        (e)   Permian Basin has good and marketable title to the Assets free and clear of any and all liens, Claims, and encumbrances of any nature and kind.

        (f)    Transferor has caused the Assets to be operated and maintained in a good and workmanlike manner consistent with good oilfield practices, has maintained insurance in force with respect to the Assets, has paid or caused to be paid all costs and expenses in connection therewith.

        (g)   There are no underground storage tanks of any nature or kind located on any of the Real Property.

        (h)   The Personal Property is in good repair, working order and operating condition.

        (i)    There are no bankruptcy, reorganization or receivership proceedings pending, being contemplated by, or to the actual knowledge of Transferor threatened against Transferor;

        (j)    The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, and the transaction contemplated hereunder has been duly and validly authorized by all requisite authorizing action, corporate, partnership or otherwise, on the part of Transferor;

        (k)   Transferor has not incurred any obligation or liability, contingent or otherwise, for brokers' or finders' fees in connection with this Agreement and the transaction provided herein.

        (l)    Transferor understands that the Shares have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"), and may not be sold except pursuant to an effective registration

H-5


Table of Contents


statement or pursuant to a duly available exemption from such registration requirements. Transferor acknowledges that the Shares have not been registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), nor with the blue sky authority of any state, and Transferor must bear the economic risk of the Shares indefinitely unless such securities are subsequently registered under the Act and the appropriate state blue sky laws or an exemption from such registration is available. Transferor understands that neither the SEC nor the securities administrator of any state has made any finding or determination relating to the fairness of an investment in the Shares and that no such government agency has or will recommend or endorse Transferor's purchase of the Shares.

        (m)  Except for the Torch Share Transfer, an affiliate of Transferor, Transferor is acquiring the Shares for its own account for investment and not with a view to dividing the Shares with others or with a view to or in connection with an offering or any distribution, and that Transferor has no present intention of selling or otherwise disposing of the Shares. Except for Torch Share Transfer, it is the present intention of Transferor to receive and hold the Shares for its own account. Any sale or exchange offer of any of the Shares will not be made in any manner that will violate the Act or any applicable blue sky law. Except for the Torch Share Transfer, Transferor has no contract, understanding, agreement, or arrangement with any person or entity to sell or transfer to any such persons or entities, or to anyone, or to have any such person or entity sell for Transferor any of the Shares and Transferor is not engaged, and does not plan to engage, within the foreseeable future, in any discussion with any person or entity relating to the sale or transfer of the Shares. Except for the Torch Share Transfer, Transferor is not aware of any occurrence, event, or circumstance upon the happening of which it intends to transfer or sell the Shares, or any part thereof, and Transferor does not have any present intention to sell the Shares, or any part thereof, after the lapse of any particular period of time.

        (n)   Transferor acknowledges that it has been furnished all information that it has requested to the extent that it considers necessary and advisable in connection with the acquisition of the Shares. Transferor understands that any financial projections provided by Resaca are based on estimates and assumptions that are inherently uncertain and, though based on assumptions Resaca believes to be reasonable, are subject to significant business, economic and competitive factors and contingencies, all of which are difficult to predict and most of which are beyond the control of Resaca. There can be no assurance that the projected results will be realized or that actual results will not be significantly higher or lower than projected.

        (o)   Transferor has had an opportunity to ask questions and to receive answers from Resaca regarding the business, properties, and financial condition of Resaca and to obtain additional information (to the extent Resaca possessed such information or could acquire it without unreasonable effort or expense) necessary to verify the accuracy of any information furnished to Transferor or to which Transferor had access.

        (p)   Transferor has adequate means of providing for its current needs and contingencies, is able to bear the substantial economic risks of the Shares for an indefinite period of time, has no need for liquidity in such investment and, at the present time, could afford a complete loss of such investment. Transferor has such knowledge and experience in financial, tax, and business matters so as to enable it to utilize the information made available to it in connection with the sale of the Shares to it by Resaca in order to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the Shares and to make an informed investment decision with respect thereto.

        (q)   Transferor is an "accredited investor" as defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D promulgated under the Act.

        (r)   The address of Transferor's principal office is 1331 Lamar, Suite 1450, Houston, Texas 77010.

        (s)   Transferor is not acquiring the Shares as a result of, or subsequent to, any advertisement, article, notice, or other communication published in any newspaper, magazine, or similar media or

H-6


Table of Contents


broadcast over television or radio or presented at any seminar or meeting, or any solicitation of a subscription by a person or entity not previously known to it in connection with investments in securities generally.

        (t)    Transferor is not relying on Resaca with respect to the tax and other economic considerations of it relating to its acquisition of the Shares. In regard to such considerations, Transferor has relied on the advice of, or has consulted with, only its own advisors.

        (u)   Transferor will not sell or otherwise transfer any of the Shares without registration under the Act or an exemption therefrom and fully understands and agree that Transferor must bear the economic risk of its purchase for an indefinite period of time because, among other reasons, the Shares have not been registered under the Act or under the securities laws of any state and, therefore, cannot be resold, pledged, assigned, or otherwise disposed of unless the Shares are subsequently registered under the Act and under the applicable securities laws of such states or unless an exemption from such registration is available. Transferor acknowledges that if any transfer of the Shares is to be made in reliance on an exemption under the Act, the issuer of the Shares may require an opinion of counsel satisfactory to it that such transfer may be made pursuant to an exemption under the Act.

        (v)   To the best knowledge of Transferor, the sale and purchase of the Shares hereunder does not violate any law or regulation applicable to Transferor.

        (w)  Transferor acknowledges that, so long as appropriate, a legend similar to the following may appear on the certificate representing the Shares: "THE SECURITIRES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER T HE SECURTIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND MAY NOT BE SOLD, TRANSFERRED, PLEDGED, HYPOTHECATED OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF IN THE ABSENCE OF (I) AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FOR SUCH SECURTIES UNDER SAID ACT OR (II) AN OPINION OF COUNSEL THAT SUCH REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED."

        (x)   Transferor is purchasing the Shares in good faith and not as part of a plan or scheme to evade the prohibitions of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), in compliance with the requirements of Rule 10b5-1 promulgated under the Exchange Act, and at a time when Transferor is not aware of or in possession of material nonpublic information about the Shares or Resaca. Transferor is not aware of any "material nonpublic information" about the Shares or Resaca, as such term is defined under Rule 10b5-1 and the judicial opinions construing Rule 10b5-1. Transferor has consulted with legal counsel and other advisors in connection with the decision of Transferor to purchase the Shares and has confirmed that its purchase of the Shares meets the criteria set forth in Rule 10b5-1. Transferor has not received or relied on any representation by Resaca regarding its compliance with Rule 10b5-1. Transferor understands and agrees that, if Transferor is an affiliate or control person for purposes of the Act or the Exchange Act, then the purchase of the Shares shall be made in accordance with Rule 10b-18 promulgated under the Exchange Act.


ARTICLE 5—TRANSFEREE'S REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

        Resaca represents and warrants to Transferor as of the date hereof, and the Closing Date that:

        (a)   Resaca is a corporation duly organized, validly existing, and in good standing under the laws of the state of Texas;

        (b)   Resaca has full power and authority to carry on its business as presently conducted, to enter into this Agreement and to perform its obligations under this Agreement. The execution and delivery of this Agreement has been, and the performance of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby shall be, at the time required to be performed hereunder, duly and validly authorized by all requisite action on the part of Resaca.

H-7


Table of Contents

        (c)   This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered on behalf of Resaca, and constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of Resaca enforceable in accordance with its terms, except as enforceability may be limited by Equitable Limitations. At the Closing, all documents and instruments required hereunder to be executed and delivered by Resaca shall be duly executed and delivered and shall constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Resaca enforceable in accordance with their terms, except as enforceability may be limited by Equitable Limitations.

        (d)   The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Resaca does not, and the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall not, (a) violate or be in conflict with, or require the consent of any person or entity under, any provisions of Resaca's organizational or governing documents, (b) conflict with, result in a breach of, constitute a default (or an event that with the lapse of time or notice, or both would constitute a default) under any agreement or instrument to which Resaca is a party or by which any of the Assets owned by Resaca is bound, (c) violate any provision of or require any consent, authorization, or approval under any judgment, decree, judicial or administrative order, award, write, injunction, statute, rule or regulation applicable to Resaca, or (d) result in the creation of any lien, charge or encumbrance of any of the Assets owned by Resaca.

        (e)   There are no bankruptcy, reorganization or receivership proceedings pending, being contemplated by, or to the actual knowledge of Transferee threatened against Transferee;

        (f)    Resaca has not incurred any obligation or liability, contingent or otherwise, for brokers' or finders' fees in connection with this Agreement and the transaction provided herein;

        (g)   The Shares to be issued and delivered to Transferor (i) have been duly authorized, (ii) at the time of their issuance, will be validly issued, fully paid, nonassessable, and were not issued in violation of any preemptive rights, and (iii) at the time of their issuance, were issued in compliance with the registration or qualification provisions of the Act and any applicable state securities laws or pursuant to valid exemptions therefrom. The Shares will, upon delivery thereof, be free and clear of all liens, charges, pledges, encumbrances, equities and claims whatsoever, other than (x) those created by Transferee, (y) as set forth herein or in the Lock-in Agreement or (y) restrictions on transfer set forth in state and federal securities laws.


ARTICLE 6—ACCESS TO INFORMATION AND INSPECTIONS

        6.1  Title Files.

        Prior to the execution of this Agreement, Transferor has permitted Transferee and its representatives, at reasonable times during normal business hours, the opportunity to examine and copy, in Transferor's offices at their actual location, all abstracts of title, title opinions, title files, title commitments, title insurance policies, title curative, and other title materials pertaining to the Real Property. No warranty of any kind is made by Transferor as to the information so supplied, and Transferee agrees that any conclusions drawn therefrom are the result of its own independent review and judgment.

        6.2  Personal Property Files.

        Prior to the execution of this Agreement, Transferor has permitted Transferee and its representatives, at reasonable times during normal business hours, the opportunity to examine and copy, in Transferor's offices at their actual location, all title files, regulatory information, inspections and reports, maintenance records, mileage logs/records and other information, files, books, records, and data pertaining to the Personal Property. No warranty of any kind is made by Transferor as to the information so supplied, and Transferee agrees that any conclusions drawn therefrom are the result of its own independent review and judgment.

H-8


Table of Contents

        6.3  Inspections.

        Prior to the execution of this Agreement, Transferor has permitted Transferee and its representatives, at reasonable times and at their sole risk, cost and expense, to conduct reasonable inspections of the Assets for all purposes.


ARTICLE 7—TITLE

        7.1  Title to Assets.

        Transferor has good and marketable title to the Assets, free and clear of any and all liens, claims or encumbrances of any kind or character as of the Closing.

        7.2  Conveyance.

        (a)   Transferor shall convey the Real Property to the Transferee as provided in the warranty deed, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "D" (the "Warranty Deed"). In addition to the general warranty set forth in the Warranty Deed, the Warranty Deed shall be made with full substitute and subrogation to Transferee in and to the covenants and warranties by others heretofore given or made to Transferor with respect to the Real Property.

        (b)   Transferor shall convey the Personal Property to the Transferee as provided in the bill of sale, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "E" (the "Bill of Sale"). The Bill of Sale shall be made without warranty of title, either express, implied, statutory or otherwise, except that Transferor shall warrant title to the Personal Property against all claims, liens, burdens and encumbrances arising by, through or under Transferor, but not otherwise.

        (c)   THE PERSONAL PROPERTY, AND THE IMPROVEMENTS, FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES CONVEYED AS PART OF THE REAL PROPERTY ARE SOLD HEREUNDER "AS IS, WHERE IS, AND WITH ALL FAULTS" AND NO WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND OR CHARACTER, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY WARRANTY OF QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR CONDITION, ARE GIVEN BY OR ON BEHALF OF TRANSFEROR. IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT PRIOR TO CLOSING TRANSFEREE SHALL HAVE INSPECTED THE PERSONAL PROPERTY FOR ALL PURPOSES AND HAS SATISFIED ITSELF AS TO THEIR PHYSICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION, BOTH SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE, AND THAT TRANSFEREE ACCEPTS SAME IN ITS "AS IS, WHERE IS AND WITH ALL FAULTS" CONDITION. TRANSFEREE HEREBY WAIVES ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR CONDITION, OR CONFORMITY TO SAMPLES.


ARTICLE 8—TRANSFER OF SHARES TO TORCH E&P

        The Parties acknowledge that Permian Basin intends to transfer all of the Shares to Torch E&P, an affiliate of Permian Basin, following the Closing (the "Torch Share Transfer"). Until the Torch Share Transfer is complete, Permian Basin agrees that it shall be bound by all of the terms and conditions of the Lock-in Agreement as if it were Torch E&P and a signatory thereto and Permian Basin will not effect any Disposal (as defined in the Lock-in Agreement) of its interest in all or any Shares except in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Lock-in Agreement.

H-9


Table of Contents


ARTICLE 9—CLOSING

        9.1  Closing.

        The closing of the transactions contemplated herein (the "Closing") shall be held at the offices of Transferee, located at 1331 Lamar, Suite 1450, Houston, Texas 77010, on the date hereof or at such later date or place as the Parties may agree in writing (herein called "Closing Date"). Time is of the essence and the Closing Date shall not be extended unless by written agreement of the Parties. The Closing may, with the consent of the Parties, take place by delivering an exchange of documents by facsimile transmission or electronic mail with originals to follow by overnight mail service or courier.

        9.2  Transferor's Closing Obligations.

        At the Closing, except to the extent comprising the Excluded Assets, Transferor shall deliver to Transferee the following:

        (a)   the Warranty Deed, the Bill of Sale and such other documents as may be reasonably necessary to convey all of Transferor's interest in the Assets to Transferee in accordance with the provisions hereof, executed and notarized by Transferor;

        (b)   all necessary and appropriate title transfer documentation (including original vehicle title certificates) for all vehicles, (trucks, trailers and construction equipment) identified in Exhibit "A";

        (c)   originals of all records and files relating to the Assets; and

        (d)   exclusive possession of the Assets.

        9.3  Transferee's Closing Obligations.

        At the Closing, Transferee shall deliver to Transferor the following:

        (a)   the Shares; and

        (b)   the Bill of Sale.


ARTICLE 10—ASSUMPTION AND INDEMNITY

        10.1  Transferor's Indemnity Obligation.

        If Closing shall occur, then effective from and after the Closing Date (unless otherwise provided for herein), Transferor hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold Transferee harmless from and against any and all Claims arising out of, resulting from or relating to: (a) any breach by Transferor of Transferor's representations, warranties or covenants set forth in this Agreement; and (b) fees, commissions or other remuneration of brokers or finders acting on behalf of Transferor in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

        10.2  Transferee's Indemnity Obligation.

        If Closing shall occur, from and after the Closing Date (unless otherwise provided for herein), Transferee hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold Transferor harmless from and against any and all Claims arising out of, resulting from, or relating to: (a) any breach by Transferee of Transferee's representations, warranties or covenants set forth in this Agreement; and (b) fees, commissions or other remuneration of brokers or finders acting on behalf of Transferee in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

        10.3  Extent of Indemnification.

        Without limiting or enlarging the scope of the indemnification, disclaimer and assumption obligations set forth in this Agreement, to the fullest extent permitted by Law, an Indemnitee shall be entitled to indemnification hereunder in accordance with the terms hereof, regardless of whether the

H-10


Table of Contents


indemnifiable loss giving rise to any such indemnification obligation is the result of the sole, active, passive, concurrent or comparative negligence, strict liability or other legal fault or violation of any Law of or by any such Indemnitee. Transferee and Transferor acknowledge that this statement complies with the express negligence rule and is conspicuous.

        10.4  Indemnity Procedures.

        From and after Closing, any demand for indemnity hereunder shall be made by written notice, together with a written description of any Claims asserted stating the nature and basis of such Claim and, if ascertainable, the amount thereof ("Indemnity Claim Notice"). The Party upon whom notice is served shall have a period of twenty (20) days after receipt of such notice within which to respond thereto or, in the case of an underlying demand which requires a shorter time for response, then within such shorter period as specified in such notice (the "Notice Period"). If the Party upon whom notice is served denies liability or fails to provide the defense for any Claim, the other Party may defend or compromise the Claim as it deems appropriate. If the Party upon whom notice is served accepts liability and responsibility for the defense of any Claim, it shall so notify the other Party as soon as is practicable prior to the expiration of the Notice Period and undertake the defense or compromise of such Claim with counsel selected by the Party accepting such liability. If the Party on whom notice is served undertakes the defense or compromise of such Claim, the other Party shall be entitled, at its own expense, to participate in such defense. No compromise or settlement of any Claim shall be made without reasonable notice to the other Party, and without the prior written approval of the other Party, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. No such approval shall be withheld if such compromise or settlement includes a general and complete release of the other Party, its successors, assigns, Affiliates and their respective Representatives in respect of the matter, with prejudice, and with no express or written admission of liability on the part of the other Party, its Affiliates and their respective Representatives, and is without cost or liability and has no constraints on the future conduct of its or their respective businesses. Purchaser and Transferor acknowledge that their obligations to indemnify, defend and hold the other Party and its Affiliates harmless under this Agreement include obligations to pay the attorneys' fees and court and arbitral costs incurred by the other Party and its Affiliates in defending said Claims, regardless of the merits of said Claims, where the Party to whom notice is served hereunder denies liability or fails to provide the defense for any said Claim. Transferor and Transferee shall have the right at all times to participate, at their sole cost, in the preparation for any defense, hearing or trial related to the indemnities set forth in this Agreement, as well as the right to appear on their own behalf or to retain separate counsel to represent them at any such hearing or trial.


ARTICLE 11—MISCELLANEOUS

        11.1  Public Announcements.

        The Parties hereto agree that prior to Closing, each may publicly disclose the principal terms of this Agreement following its execution, provided that prior to making any public announcement or statement with respect to the transaction contemplated by this Agreement, the Party desiring to make such public announcement or statement shall consult with the other Party hereto and exercise its best efforts to (i) agree upon the text of a joint public announcement or statement to be made by both of such Parties; or (ii) obtain written approval of the other Party hereto to the text of a public announcement or statement to be made solely by Transferor or Transferee, as the case may be. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall be construed to require either Party to obtain approval of the other Party hereto to disclose information with respect to the transaction contemplated by this Agreement to any state or federal governmental authority or agency to the extent (i) required by applicable law or by any applicable rules, regulations or orders of any governmental authority or agency having jurisdiction; or (ii) necessary to comply with disclosure requirements of the London Stock Exchange or other recognized exchange or over the counter, and applicable securities laws.

H-11


Table of Contents

        11.2  Filing and Recording of Assignments, etc.

        Transferee shall be solely responsible for all filings and the prompt recording of assignments and other documents related to the transfer of the Assets as contemplated hereunder and for all fees connected therewith, and Transferee shall furnish certified copies of all such filed and/or recorded documents to Transferor. Transferor shall not be responsible for any loss to Transferee because of Transferee's failure to file or record documents correctly or promptly.

        11.3  Further Assurances and Records.

        After the Closing, each of the Parties will execute, acknowledge and deliver to the other such further instruments, and take such other action, as may be reasonably requested in order to more effectively assure to said Party all of the respective properties, rights, titles, interests, estates, and privileges intended to be assigned, delivered or inuring to the benefit of such Party in consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby.

        11.4  Notices.

        Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, all communications required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and may be given by personal delivery, facsimile, US mail (postage prepaid), or commercial delivery service, and any communication hereunder shall be deemed to have been duly given and received when actually delivered to the address of the Parties to be notified as set forth below and addressed as follows:

        If to Transferor, as follows:

H-12


Table of Contents

Provided, however, that any notice required or permitted under this Agreement will be effective if given verbally within the time provided, so long as such verbal notice is followed by written notice thereof in the manner provided herein within twenty-four (24) hours following the end of such time period. Any Party may, by written notice so delivered to the other, change the address to which delivery shall thereafter be made.

        11.5  Incidental Expenses.

        Transferee shall bear and pay (i) all state or local government sales, transfer, gross proceeds, or similar taxes incident to or caused by the transfer of the Assets to Transferee, (ii) all documentary, transfer and other state and local government taxes incident to the transfer of the Assets to Transferee; and (iii) all filing, recording or registration fees for any assignment or conveyance delivered hereunder. Each Party shall bear its own respective expenses incurred in connection with the negotiation and Closing of this transaction, including its own consultants' fees, attorneys' fees, accountants' fees, and other similar costs and expenses.

        11.6  Waiver

        Any of the terms, provisions, covenants, representations, warranties or conditions hereof may be waived only by a written instrument executed by the Party waiving compliance. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, the failure of any Party at any time or times to require performance of any provision hereof shall in no manner affect such Party's right to enforce the same. No waiver by any Party of any condition, or of the breach of any term, provision, covenant, representation or warranty contained in this Agreement, whether by conduct or otherwise, in any one or more instances, shall be deemed to be or construed as a further or continuing waiver of any such condition or breach or a waiver of any other condition or of the breach of any other term, provision, covenant, representation or warranty.

        11.7  Binding Effect.

        All the terms, provisions, covenants, obligations, indemnities, representations, warranties and conditions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, and shall be enforceable by, the Parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.

        11.8  Taxes.

        (a)   Transferor and Transferee agree that this transaction may be subject to the reporting requirement of Section 1060 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and that, therefore, IRS Form 8594, Asset Acquisition Statement, will be filed for this transaction. The Parties will confer and cooperate in the preparation and filing of their respective forms to reflect a consistent reporting of the agreed upon allocation.

        (b)   Transferor shall be responsible for all state, local and federal property, ad valorem, excise, and severance taxes attributable to or arising from the ownership or operation of the Assets prior to the Effective Time. Transferee shall be responsible for all property and severance taxes attributable to or arising from the ownership or operation of the Assets after the Effective Time. Any Party which pays such taxes for the other Party shall be entitled to prompt reimbursement upon evidence of such

H-13


Table of Contents


payment. Each Party shall be responsible for its own federal and state income taxes, if any, as may result from this transaction. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the Transfer Price has been adjusted to reflect the proper allocation between the Parties of all state, local and federal property and ad valorem taxes on the Real Property for 2009 and neither Party shall be entitled to reimbursement from the other for such taxes.

        (c)   If this transaction is determined to result in state sales or transfer taxes, Transferee shall be solely responsible for any and all such taxes due on the Assets acquired by Transferee by virtue of this transaction. If Transferee is assessed such taxes, Transferee shall promptly remit same to the taxing authority. If Transferor is assessed such taxes, Transferee shall reimburse Transferor for any such taxes paid by Transferor to the taxing authority.

        11.9  Governing Law.

        THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED, CONSTRUED AND ENFORCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, WITHOUT REGARD TO PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICTS OF LAWS OTHERWISE APPLICABLE TO SUCH DETERMINATIONS. JURISDICTION AND VENUE WITH RESPECT TO ANY DISPUTES ARISING HEREUNDER SHALL BE PROPER ONLY IN HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS.

        11.10  Entire Agreement.

        This Agreement embodies the entire agreement between the Parties and replaces and supersedes all prior agreements, arrangements and understandings related to the subject matter hereof, whether written or oral. No other agreement, statement, or promise made by any Party, or to any employee, officer or agent of any Party which is not contained in this Agreement shall be binding or valid. This Agreement may be supplemented, altered, amended, modified or revoked by a writing only, signed by the Parties hereto. The headings herein are for convenience only and shall have no significance in the interpretation hereof. The Parties stipulate and agree that this Agreement shall be deemed and considered for all purposes, as prepared through the joint efforts of the Parties, and shall not be construed against one Party or the other as a result of the preparation, submittal or other event of negotiation, drafting or execution thereof. It is understood and agreed that there shall be no third-party beneficiary of this Agreement, and the provisions hereof do not impart enforceable rights in anyone who is not a direct, initial Party hereto.

        11.11  Severability.

        If any provision of this Agreement is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, that provision will be deemed modified to the extent necessary to make it valid and enforceable, and if it cannot be so modified, it shall be deemed deleted and the remainder of the Agreement shall continue and remain in full force and effect.

        11.12  Exhibits.

        All Exhibits attached to this Agreement, and the terms of those Exhibits which are referred to in this Agreement, are made a part hereof and incorporated herein by reference.

        11.13  Survival.

        Unless otherwise specifically provided in this Agreement, all of the representations, warranties, indemnities, covenants and agreements of or by the Parties hereto shall survive the execution and delivery of the Warranty Deed and Bill of Sale.

        11.14  Counterparts.

        This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, and each and every counterpart shall be deemed for all purposes one (1) agreement.

H-14


Table of Contents

        11.15  Subrogation.

        To the fullest extent allowed by law and the applicable agreements with third parties, Transferor grants Transferee a right of subrogation in all claims or rights Transferor may have against third parties to the extent they relate to the Assumed Obligations.

        11.16  No Third-Party Beneficiaries.

        Nothing in this Agreement shall entitle any Person other than Transferee and Transferor to any Claims, remedy or right of any kind, except as to those rights expressly provided to Transferor Indemnitees and Transferee Indemnitees (provided, however, any claim for indemnity hereunder on behalf of a Transferor Indemnitee or a Transferee Indemnitee must be made and administered by a Party to this Agreement).

[Signature page to follow]

H-15


Table of Contents

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

    TRANSFEROR:
    PERMIAN BASIN WELL SERVICES, LLC

 

 

By:

 

/s/ MARY LOU FRY

    Name:   Mary Lou Fry

    Title:   Vice President and Secretary


 

 

TRANSFEREE:
    RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ DENNIS HAMMOND

    Name:   Dennis Hammond

    Title:   President and Chief Operating Officer

Signature Page Asset Transfer Agreement

H-16


Table of Contents


TORCH E & P COMPANY

AGREEMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

        The undersigned, Torch E&P, acknowledges and agrees as follows:

        (a)   Torch E&P has reviewed the Agreement and understands the terms and conditions thereof.

        (b)   Permian Basin, an affiliate of Torch E&P, shall transfer the Shares to Torch E&P following the Closing and Torch E&P shall acquire the Shares from Permian Basin.

        (c)   The obligation of Resaca to acquire and pay for the Assets is expressly subject to and conditioned upon Resaca obtaining shareholder approval of the transactions contemplated in the Agreement at its next annual shareholders meeting which shall occur after the Closing. In the event that Resaca's shareholders do not approve the transactions contemplated in the Agreement and Permian Basin has already transferred the Shares to Torch E&P, simultaneous with the re-conveyance of the Assets to Permian Basin by Resaca, Torch E&P shall transfer and deliver to Resaca all of the Shares free and clear of any and all liens and encumbrances.

        (d)   Following the completion of the Torch Share Transfer, the Shares shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Lock-in Agreement.

        All capitalized terms not defined above shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.


 

 

 

 

 
    TORCH E & P COMPANY

 

 

By:

 

/s/ MARY LOU FRY

    Name:   Mary Lou Fry

    Title:   Vice President and Secretary

Torch E&P Company Agreement and Acknowledgement

H-17


Table of Contents


EXHIBIT "A"

        Attached to and made a part of that certain Asset Transfer Agreement by and between Permian Basin Well Services, Inc., as Transferor, and Resaca Exploitation, Inc., as Transferee, dated and effective as of the 1st day of July, 2009


Personal Property

I.
WORKOVER RIGS

A.
Well Service Rig No. 101
B.
Well Service Rig No 103

H-18


Table of Contents

C.
Well Service Rig No. 104

H-19


Table of Contents

II.
REVERSE UNITS/TANK

1.
GARDNER-DENVER PE-5 RJM Triplex Pump, S/N-653366, p/b DETROIT 6V-71 Diesel Engine w/EATON-FULLER Manual Transmission, Mounted on Shopbuilt Single Axle Lowboy Trailer w/4'H × 8'W × 12'L Reverse Circulating Tank, 2" Manifold w/(4) Plug Valves, Type D Pressure Gauge, 10.00x20 Tires, Budd Wheels, Lic #693-M36, Unit # 402

2.
GARDNER-DENVER PE-5 Triplex Pump, S/N-4622224, p/b CUMMINS M-11 V-6 Diesel Engine w/ALLISON 524 Transmission, 8'W × 5'11 × 3'H × 17'L 2-Level Reverse Circulating Tank, 2" Manifold w/(4) Plug Valves, Type D Pressure Gauge, Mounted on 8'W × 40'L Tandem Axle Lowboy Trailer, 10.00Rx15 tires, Budd Wheels, Lic #694-M36, Unit # 401

3.
7'6"W × 4'H × 20'L Mud Tank, Skidded

III.
POWER SWIVELS

1.
BOWEN S-2.5 Power Swivel, S/N-N/A, on 2006 PARKER Tandem Axle Gooseneck Trailer, VIN-13ZGN142061004094, w/Hydraulic Power Unit p/b DETROIT 6V-92T Diesel Engine w/Electric Starter, Radiator, Gauges, Operator's Control Panel, Hose Reels, Hoses, Fuel & Hydraulic Tanks, Tubing Stripper, Lic. #70Y-XVP

2.
BOWEN S-2.5 Power Swivel, S/N-N/A, on Tandem Axle Gooseneck Trailer, VIN-N/A, w/Hydraulic Power Unit p/b DETROIT 6V-92 Diesel Engine w/Electric Starter, Radiator, Gauges, Operator's Control Panel, Hose Reels, Hoses, Fuel & Hydraulic Tanks, Tubing Stripper, Lic #69M-885

IV.
VEHICLES

A.
Trucks

1.
2006 CHEVROLET 2500HD Crew Cab Pickup, VIN-1GCHC23U56F140328, p/b Gas Engine, Automatic Transmission, Auxiliary Fuel Tanks w/Pump, Grille Guard, Lic #94MXC3 (Unit #302)

2.
2006 FORD F-250 XL Crew Cab Pickup, VIN-1FTSW20596EC94556, p/b Gas Engine, Auxiliary Fuel Tank w/Pump, Grille Guard, 76,773 Miles on Odometer, Lic #53Z-PY4 (Unit #305)

3.
2006 FORD F-250 XL Extended Cab Pickup, VIN-1FTSX20586EO61676, p/b Gas Engine, Automatic Transmission, Auxiliary Fuel Tank w/Pump, Grille Guard, Lic #77L-MT7 (Unit #206)

4.
2006 CHEVROLET 2500HD 4x4 Crew Cab Pickup, VIN-1GCHK23U36F201050, p/b Gas Engine, Automatic Transmission, Lic #09Z-KB3 (Unit #202)

5.
2007 FORD F-150 XLT Super Crew Pickup, VIN-1FTRW12W57FA19132, 114,000 Miles on Odometer, Lic. # 57Z-RB4 (Unit #200)

B.
Trailers

1.
Shopbuilt 38'L Tandem Axle Pipe-Frame Collar Trailer, Lic #83Z-NJJ, OA(G)

2.
2006 DISCOUNT TRAILER 14'L Tandem Axle Utility Trailer, VIN-D9FS142261131128, Lic #29Y-TPB, OA(G) Appearance

3.
Tandem Axle Utility Trailer w/CASTER 2 × 3 Centrifugal Pump p/b DEUTZ 3-Cylinder Diesel Engine, CURTIS Air Compressor p/b Gas Engine

H-20


Table of Contents

V.
RELATED EQUIPMENT

1.
(6) 31/8"OD × 28'L to 30'L Drill Collars (G)

2.
(6) 33/8"OD × 28'L to 30'L Drill Collars (F)

3.
558' (18 Joints) 27/8" EUE Range 2 Tubing

4.
(2) 42"H × 28'L Triangular Pipe Racks

5.
(2) 42"H × Approximately 14'L Triangular Pipe Racks

6.
15" DR Hydromatic Brake (Rebuilt)

7.
15" DR Hydromatic Brake (Salvage)

8.
31/2" EUE Tubing Elevator

9.
Line Scale Weight Indicator

10.
McKISSICK 75-Ton Tubing Block (Refurbished)

11.
Spare BJ Tubing longs

12.
Spare BJ Rod Tongs

13.
SPICER Dropbox

14.
23/8" Tubing Elevator

15.
BV 23/8" Tubing Elevator

16.
GUIBERSON Air Slips

VI.
SHOP EQUIPMENT

1.
POLAR-COOL Shop Cooler

2.
DURAPRESS Force 25DA H-Frame Press, S/N-72869, Hydraulic Cylinder

3.
CENTRAL MACHINERY Floor Model Drill Press, S/N-05202Q0009

4.
DAYTON 8" Dual-Arbor Bench Grinder w/Pedestal

5.
(2) LINCOLN E300 Welders

6.
MILLER Millermatic 251 Welder w/Wire Feeder

7.
MAKITA Chop Saw

8.
4' × 8' Steel Shop Table w/WILTON Vise

9.
CHICAGO ELECTRIC Battery Charger

10.
Oil-Fired Electric Shop Heater

11.
HUSKY PRO 60-Gallon Vertical Shop Air Compressor

12.
HOIST-A-FRAME w/JET L-90 11/2-Ton Chain Hoist

H-21


Table of Contents


EXHIBIT "B"

        Attached to and made a part of that certain Asset Transfer Agreement by and between Permian Basin Well Services, Inc., as Transferor, and Resaca Exploitation, Inc., as Transferee, dated and effective as of the 1st day of July, 2009


Real Property

The East Five (5) acres of a 10 Acre Tract of land in the South part of Section 32, Block 42, T-2-S, T & P Ry. Company Survey, Ector County, Texas, described by metes and bounds as follows, to-wit:

BEGINNING at a.1/2" iron pipe in the South boundary of Section 32, Block 42, T-2-S, T & P Ry. Company Survey, Ector County, Texas for the Southeast corner of a 10-Acre tract and this tract, from which point a 4" galvanized iron pipe in the East boundary of State Farm Road 2227 and at the Southeast corner of Section 32, bears N75°18'E, 2732.55 feet;

THENCE N15°23'W, with the East boundary of 10-Acre tract, 982.6 feet to a 1/2" iron pipe for the Northeast corner of 10-Acre tract and this tract;

THENCE S74°47'W, with the North boundary of 10-Acre, tract, 222.0 feet to a 60 d nail for the Northwest corner of this tract, from which point a 5.5" iron rod at the Northwest corner of said 10-Acre tract bears S74°17'W, 222.0 feet;

THENCE S15°22-1/2' E, 980.6 feet to an iron bolt in the South boundary of 10-Acre tract for the Southwest corner of this tract, from which point a 60 d nail at the Southwest corner of 10-Acre tract bears S75°18'W, 222.15 feet;

THENCE N75°18'E, with South boundary of 10-Acre tract, 222.15 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, containing 5.0 acres of land, and being the East 5.0 acres of said 10-acre tract.

H-22


Table of Contents


ANNEX I

         RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC.
2008 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

(As Effective July 10, 2008)


Table of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
   
   
  Page

SECTION 1.

 

GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO PLAN GOVERNANCE, COVERAGE AND BENEFITS

  I-1

1.1  

 

Background and Purpose

  I-1

1.2  

 

Definitions

  I-1

 

(a)

  Authorized Officer   I-1

 

(b)

  Board   I-1

 

(c)

  Cause   I-1

 

(d)

  CEO   I-2

 

(e)

  Change in Control   I-2

 

(f)

  Code   I-2

 

(g)

  Committee   I-2

 

(h)

  Common Stock   I-2

 

(i)

  Company   I-2

 

(j)

  Consultant   I-2

 

(k)

  Covered Employee   I-3

 

(l)

  Disability   I-3

 

(m)

  Employee   I-3

 

(n)

  Employment   I-3

 

(o)

  Exchange Act   I-3

 

(p)

  Fair Market Value   I-3

 

(q)

  Grantee   I-4

 

(r)

  Immediate Family   I-4

 

(s)

  Incentive Agreement   I-4

 

(t)

  Incentive Award   I-4

 

(u)

  Incentive Stock Option or ISO   I-4

 

(v)

  Insider   I-4

 

(w)

  Nonstatutory Stock Option   I-4

 

(x)

  Option Price   I-4

 

(y)

  Other Stock-Based Award   I-4

 

(z)

  Outside Director   I-4

 

(aa)

  Parent   I-4

 

(bb)

  Performance-Based Award   I-4

 

(cc)

  Performance-Based Exception   I-4

 

(dd)

  Performance Criteria   I-4

 

(ee)

  Performance Period   I-5

 

(ff)

  Plan   I-5

 

(gg)

  Plan Year   I-5

 

(hh)

  Publicly Held Corporation   I-5

 

(ii)

  Restricted Stock   I-5

 

(jj)

  Restricted Stock Award   I-5

 

(kk)

  Restricted Stock Unit   I-5

 

(ll)

  Restriction Period   I-5

 

(mm)

  Retirement   I-5

 

(nn)

  Share   I-5

 

(oo)

  Share Pool   I-5

 

(pp)

  Spread   I-5

 

(qq)

  Stock Appreciation Right or SAR   I-5

 

(rr)

  Stock Option or Option   I-5

i


Table of Contents

 
   
   
  Page

 

(ss)

  Subsidiary   I-5

 

(tt)

  Supplemental Payment   I-5

1.3  

 

Plan Administration

  I-6

 

(a)

  Authority of the Committee   I-6

 

(b)

  Meetings   I-6

 

(c)

  Decisions Binding   I-6

 

(d)

  Modification of Outstanding Incentive Awards   I-6

 

(e)

  Delegation of Authority   I-6

 

(f)

  Expenses of Committee   I-7

 

(g)

  Surrender of Previous Incentive Awards   I-7

 

(h)

  Indemnification   I-7

1.4  

 

Shares of Common Stock Available for Incentive Awards

  I-7

1.5  

 

Share Pool Adjustments for Awards and Payouts

  I-8

1.6  

 

Common Stock Available

  I-8

1.7  

 

Participation

  I-9

 

(a)

  Eligibility   I-9

 

(b)

  Incentive Stock Option Eligibility   I-9

1.8  

 

Types of Incentive Awards

  I-9

SECTION 2.

 

STOCK OPTIONS AND STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS

 
I-9

2.1  

 

Grant of Stock Options

  I-9

2.2  

 

Stock Option Terms

  I-9

 

(a)

  Written Agreement   I-9

 

(b)

  Number of Shares   I-10

 

(c)

  Exercise Price   I-10

 

(d)

  Term   I-10

 

(e)

  Exercise   I-10

 

(f)

  $100,000 Annual Limit on Incentive Stock Options   I-10

2.3  

 

Stock Option Exercises

  I-10

 

(a)

  Method of Exercise and Payment   I-10

 

(b)

  Restrictions on Share Transferability   I-11

 

(c)

  Notification of Disqualifying Disposition of Shares from Incentive Stock Options   I-11

 

(d)

  Proceeds of Option Exercise   I-12

2.4  

 

Supplemental Payment on Exercise of Nonstatutory Stock Options

  I-12

2.5  

 

Stock Appreciation Rights

  I-12

 

(a)

  Grant   I-12

 

(b)

  General Provisions   I-12

 

(c)

  Exercise   I-12

 

(d)

  Settlement   I-12

SECTION 3.

 

RESTRICTED STOCK

 
I-12

3.1  

 

Award of Restricted Stock

  I-12

 

(a)

  Grant   I-12

 

(b)

  Immediate Transfer Without Immediate Delivery of Restricted Stock   I-13

3.2  

 

Restrictions

  I-13

 

(a)

  Forfeiture of Restricted Stock   I-13

 

(b)

  Issuance of Certificates   I-13

 

(c)

  Removal of Restrictions   I-14

3.3  

 

Delivery of Shares of Common Stock

  I-14

3.4  

 

Supplemental Payment on Vesting of Restricted Stock

  I-14

ii


Table of Contents

 
   
   
  Page

SECTION 4.

 

OTHER STOCK-BASED AWARDS

  I-14

4.1  

 

Grant of Other Stock-Based Awards

  I-14

4.2  

 

Other Stock-Based Award Terms

  I-15

 

(a)

  Written Agreement   I-15

 

(b)

  Purchase Price   I-15

 

(c)

  Performance Criteria and Other Terms   I-15

4.3  

 

Supplemental Payment on Other Stock-Based Awards

  I-15

SECTION 5.

 

PERFORMANCE-BASED AWARDS AND PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

 
I-16

SECTION 6.

 

PROVISIONS RELATING TO PLAN PARTICIPATION

 
I-17

6.1  

 

Incentive Agreement

  I-17

6.2  

 

No Right to Employment

  I-18

6.3  

 

Securities Requirements

  I-18

6.4  

 

Transferability

  I-18

6.5  

 

Rights as a Shareholder

  I-19

 

(a)

  No Shareholder Rights   I-19

 

(b)

  Representation of Ownership   I-19

6.6  

 

Change in Stock and Adjustments

  I-19

 

(a)

  Changes in Law or Circumstances   I-19

 

(b)

  Exercise of Corporate Powers   I-20

 

(c)

  Recapitalization of the Company   I-20

 

(d)

  Issue of Common Stock by the Company   I-20

 

(e)

  Assumption under the Plan of Outstanding Stock Options   I-20

 

(f)

  Assumption of Incentive Awards by a Successor   I-21

6.7  

 

Termination of Employment, Death, Disability and Retirement

  I-21

 

(a)

  Termination of Employment   I-21

 

(b)

  Termination of Employment for Cause   I-22

 

(c)

  Retirement   I-22

 

(d)

  Disability or Death   I-22

 

(e)

  Continuation   I-22

6.8  

 

Change in Control

  I-23

6.9  

 

Exchange of Incentive Awards

  I-24

SECTION 7.

 

GENERAL

 
I-24

7.1  

 

Effective Date and Grant Period

  I-24

7.2  

 

Funding and Liability of Company

  I-25

7.3  

 

Withholding Taxes

  I-25

 

(a)

  Tax Withholding   I-25

 

(b)

  Share Withholding   I-25

 

(c)

  Incentive Stock Options   I-25

7.4  

 

No Guarantee of Tax Consequences

  I-25

7.5  

 

Designation of Beneficiary by Participant

  I-26

7.6  

 

Deferrals

  I-26

7.7  

 

Amendment and Termination

  I-26

7.8  

 

Requirements of Law

  I-26

 

(a)

  Governmental Entities and Securities Exchanges   I-26

 

(b)

  Securities Act Rule 701   I-27

7.9  

 

Rule 16b-3 Securities Law Compliance for Insiders

  I-27

7.10

 

Compliance with Code Section 162(m) for Publicly Held Corporation

  I-28

7.11

 

Compliance with Code Section 409A

  I-28

iii


Table of Contents

 
   
   
  Page

7.12

 

Notices

  I-28

 

(a)

  Notice From Insiders to Secretary of Change in Beneficial Ownership   I-28

 

(b)

  Notice to Insiders and Securities and Exchange Commission   I-28

7.13

 

Pre-Clearance Agreement with Brokers

  I-28

7.14

 

Successors to Company

  I-29

7.15

 

Miscellaneous Provisions

  I-29

7.16

 

Severability

  I-29

7.17

 

Gender, Tense and Headings

  I-29

7.18

 

Governing Law

  I-29

iv


Table of Contents

RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC.
2008 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


SECTION 1.

GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO
PLAN GOVERNANCE, COVERAGE AND BENEFITS

1.1  Background and Purpose

        Resaca Exploitation, Inc., a Texas corporation (the "Company"), has adopted this plan document, entitled Resaca Exploitation, Inc. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan" (the "Plan"), effective as of July 10, 2008 (the "Effective Date").

        The purpose of the Plan is to foster and promote the long-term financial success of the Company and to increase stockholder value by: (a) encouraging the commitment of selected key Employees, Consultants and Outside Directors, (b) motivating superior performance of key Employees, Consultants and Outside Directors by means of long-term performance related incentives, (c) encouraging and providing key Employees, Consultants and Outside Directors with a program for obtaining ownership interests in the Company which link and align their personal interests to those of the Company's stockholders, (d) attracting and retaining key Employees, Consultants and Outside Directors by providing competitive compensation opportunities, and (e) enabling key Employees, Consultants and Outside Directors to share in the long-term growth and success of the Company.

        The Plan provides for payment of various forms of compensation. It is not intended to be a plan that is subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"). The Plan will be interpreted, construed and administered consistent with its status as a plan that is not subject to ERISA.

        The Plan will remain in effect, subject to the right of the Board to amend or terminate the Plan at any time pursuant to Section 7.7, until all Shares subject to the Plan have been purchased or acquired according to its provisions. However, in no event may an Incentive Stock Option be granted under the Plan after the expiration of ten (10) years from the Effective Date to the extent required by Code Section 422(b)(2).

1.2  Definitions

        The following terms shall have the meanings set forth below:

        (a)    Authorized Officer.    The Chairman of the Board, the CEO or any other senior officer of the Company to whom either of them delegate the authority to execute any Incentive Agreement for and on behalf of the Company. No officer or director shall be an Authorized Officer with respect to any Incentive Agreement for himself.

        (b)    Board.    The Board of Directors of the Company.

        (c)    Cause.    When used in connection with the termination of a Grantee's Employment, shall mean the termination of the Grantee's Employment by the Company or any Subsidiary by reason of (i) the conviction of the Grantee by a court of competent jurisdiction as to which no further appeal can be taken of a crime involving moral turpitude or a felony; (ii) the commission by the Grantee of a material act of fraud upon the Company or any Subsidiary, or any customer or supplier thereof; (iii) the misappropriation of any funds or property of the Company or any Subsidiary, or any customer or supplier thereof; (iv) the willful and continued failure by the Grantee to perform the material duties assigned to him that is not cured to the reasonable satisfaction of the Company within 30 days after written notice of such failure is provided to Grantee by the Board or CEO (or by another officer of the

I-1


Table of Contents


Company or a Subsidiary who has been designated by the Board or CEO for such purpose); (v) the engagement by the Grantee in any direct and material conflict of interest with the Company or any Subsidiary without compliance with the Company's or Subsidiary's conflict of interest policy, if any, then in effect; (vi) the engagement by the Grantee, without the written approval of the Board or CEO, in any material activity which competes with the business of the Company or any Subsidiary or which would result in a material injury to the business, reputation or goodwill of the Company or any Subsidiary; or (vii) an event constituting "cause" as defined under the Grantee's current employment agreement.

        (d)    CEO.    The Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

        (e)    Change in Control.    Any of the events described in and subject to Section 6.8.

        (f)    Code.    The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations and other authority promulgated thereunder by the appropriate governmental authority. References herein to any provision of the Code shall refer to any successor provision thereto.

        (g)    Committee.    The committee appointed by the Board to administer the Plan. If the Company is a Publicly Held Corporation, the Plan shall be administered by the Committee appointed by the Board consisting of not less than two directors who fulfill the "nonemployee director" requirements of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act and the "outside director" requirements of Code Section 162(m). In either case, the Committee may be the Compensation Committee of the Board, or any subcommittee of the Compensation Committee, provided that the members of the Committee satisfy the requirements of the previous provisions of this paragraph.

        The Board shall have the power to fill vacancies on the Committee arising by resignation, death, removal or otherwise. The Board, in its sole discretion, may bifurcate the powers and duties of the Committee among one or more separate committees, or retain all powers and duties of the Committee in a single Committee. The members of the Committee shall serve at the discretion of the Board.

        Notwithstanding the preceding paragraphs of this Section 1.2(g), the term "Committee" as used in the Plan with respect to any Incentive Award for an Outside Director shall refer to the entire Board. In the case of an Incentive Award for an Outside Director, the Board shall have all the powers and responsibilities of the Committee hereunder as to such Incentive Award, and any actions as to such Incentive Award may be acted upon only by the Board (unless it otherwise designates in its discretion). When the Board exercises its authority to act in the capacity as the Committee hereunder with respect to an Incentive Award for an Outside Director, it shall so designate with respect to any action that it undertakes in its capacity as the Committee.

        (h)    Common Stock.    The common stock of the Company, $0.01 par value per share, and any class of common stock into which such common shares may hereafter be converted, reclassified or recapitalized.

        (i)    Company.    Resaca Exploitation, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Texas, and any successor in interest thereto.

        (j)    Consultant.    An independent agent, consultant, attorney, or any other individual who is not an Outside Director or employee of the Company (or any Parent or Subsidiary) and who, in the opinion of the Committee, is (i) in a position to contribute to the growth or financial success of the Company (or any Parent or Subsidiary), (ii) is a natural person and (iii) provides bona fide services to the Company (or any Parent or Subsidiary), which services are not in connection with the offer or sale of securities in a capital raising transaction, and do not directly or indirectly promote or maintain a market for the Company's securities.

I-2


Table of Contents

        (k)    Covered Employee.    A named executive officer who is one of the group of covered employees, as defined in Code Section 162(m) and Treasury Regulation Section 1.162-27(c) (or its successor), during any period that the Company is a Publicly Held Corporation.

        (l)    Disability.    As determined by the Committee in its discretion exercised in good faith, means that the Grantee (i) is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, or (ii) is, by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, receiving income replacement benefits for a period of not less than 3 months under an accident and health plan covering employees of the Company. A determination of Disability may be made by a physician selected or approved by the Committee and, in this respect, the Grantee shall submit to any reasonable examination(s) required in the opinion of such physician.

        (m)    Employee.    Any employee of the Company (or any Parent or Subsidiary) within the meaning of Code Section 3401(c) including, without limitation, officers who are members of the Board.

        (n)    Employment.    Employment means that the individual is employed as an Employee, or engaged as a Consultant or Outside Director, by the Company (or any Parent or Subsidiary), or by any corporation issuing or assuming an Incentive Award in any transaction described in Code Section 424(a), or by a parent corporation or a subsidiary corporation of such corporation issuing or assuming such Incentive Award, as the parent-subsidiary relationship shall be determined at the time of the corporate action described in Code Section 424(a). In this regard, neither the transfer of a Grantee from Employment by the Company to Employment by any Parent or Subsidiary, nor the transfer of a Grantee from Employment by any Parent or Subsidiary to Employment by the Company, shall be deemed to be a termination of Employment of the Grantee. Moreover, the Employment of a Grantee shall not be deemed to have been terminated because of an approved leave of absence from active Employment on account of temporary illness, authorized vacation or granted for reasons of professional advancement, education, or health, or during any period required to be treated as a leave of absence by virtue of any applicable statute, Company personnel policy or written agreement.

        The term "Employment" for purposes of the Plan shall include (i) active performance of agreed services by a Consultant for the Company (or any Parent or Subsidiary) or (ii) current membership on the Board by an Outside Director.

        All determinations regarding Employment, and termination of Employment, shall be made by the Committee in its discretion.

        (o)    Exchange Act.    The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

        (p)    Fair Market Value.    If the Company is a Publicly Held Corporation, the Fair Market Value of one Share on the date in question shall be (i) the closing sales price on such day for a Share as quoted on the London Stock Exchange's Alternative Investment Market ("AIM") or the securities exchange on which Shares are then principally listed or admitted to trading, or (ii) if not quoted on AIM or other securities exchange, the average of the closing bid and asked prices for a Share as quoted by the National Quotation Bureau's "Pink Sheets" or the National Association of Securities Dealers' OTC Bulletin Board System. If there was no public trade of Common Stock on the date in question, Fair Market Value shall be determined by reference to the last preceding date on which such a trade was so reported.

        If the Company is not a Publicly Held Corporation at the time a determination of the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock is required to be made hereunder, the determination of Fair Market Value for purposes of the Plan shall be made by the Committee in its discretion. In this respect, the Committee may rely on such financial data, appraisals, valuations, experts, and other sources as, in its

I-3


Table of Contents


sole and absolute discretion, it deems advisable under the circumstances. With respect to Stock Options, SARs, and other Incentive Awards subject to Code Section 409A, such Fair Market Value shall be determined by the Committee consistent with the requirements of Section 409A in order to satisfy the exception under Section 409A for stock rights.

        (q)    Grantee.    Any Employee, Consultant or Outside Director who is granted an Incentive Award under the Plan.

        (r)    Immediate Family.    With respect to a Grantee, the Grantee's child, stepchild, grandchild, parent, stepparent, grandparent, spouse, former spouse, sibling, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, or sister-in-law, including adoptive relationships.

        (s)    Incentive Agreement.    The written agreement entered into between the Company and the Grantee setting forth the terms and conditions pursuant to which an Incentive Award is granted under the Plan, as such agreement is further defined in Section 6.1.

        (t)    Incentive Award.    A grant of an award under the Plan to a Grantee, including any Nonstatutory Stock Option, Incentive Stock Option (ISO), Stock Appreciation Right (SAR), Restricted Stock Award, Restricted Stock Unit or Other Stock-Based Award, as well as any Supplemental Payment with respect thereto.

        (u)    Incentive Stock Option or ISO.    A Stock Option granted by the Committee to an Employee under Section 2 which is designated by the Committee as an Incentive Stock Option and intended to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option under Code Section 422.

        (v)    Insider.    If the Company is a Publicly Held Corporation, an individual who is, on the relevant date, an officer, director or ten percent (10%) beneficial owner of any class of the Company's equity securities that is registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, all as defined under Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

        (w)    Nonstatutory Stock Option.    A Stock Option granted by the Committee to a Grantee under Section 2 that is not designated by the Committee as an Incentive Stock Option.

        (x)    Option Price.    The exercise price at which a Share may be purchased by the Grantee of a Stock Option.

        (y)    Other Stock-Based Award.    An award granted by the Committee to a Grantee under Section 4 that is valued in whole or in part by reference to, or is otherwise based upon, Common Stock.

        (z)    Outside Director.    A member of the Board who is not, at the time of grant of an Incentive Award, an employee of the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary.

        (aa)    Parent.    Any corporation (whether now or hereafter existing) which constitutes a "parent" of the Company, as defined in Code Section 424(e).

        (bb)    Performance-Based Award.    A grant of an Incentive Award under the Plan pursuant to Section 5 that is intended to satisfy the Performance-Based Exception.

        (cc)    Performance-Based Exception.    The performance-based exception from the tax deductibility limitations of Code Section 162(m), as prescribed in Code Section 162(m) and Treasury Regulation Section 1.162-27(e) (or its successor), which is applicable during such period that the Company is a Publicly Held Corporation.

        (dd)    Performance Criteria.    The business criteria that are specified by the Committee pursuant to Section 5 for an Incentive Award that is intended to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception; the satisfaction of such business criteria during the Performance Period being required for the grant and/or vesting of the particular Incentive Award to occur, as specified in the particular Incentive Agreement.

I-4


Table of Contents

        (ee)    Performance Period.    A period of time determined by the Committee over which performance is measured for the purpose of determining a Grantee's right to, and the payment value of, any Incentive Award that is intended to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception.

        (ff)    Plan.    Resaca Exploitation, Inc. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan, as effective on the Effective Date, which is set forth herein and as it may be amended from time to time.

        (gg)    Plan Year.    The calendar year, except for the first Plan Year which shall be a short plan year beginning on the Effective Date, and ending on December 31, 2008.

        (hh)    Publicly Held Corporation.    A corporation issuing any class of common equity securities required to be registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.

        (ii)    Restricted Stock.    Common Stock that is issued or transferred to a Grantee pursuant to Section 3.

        (jj)    Restricted Stock Award.    An authorization by the Committee to issue or transfer Restricted Stock to a Grantee pursuant to Section 3.

        (kk)    Restricted Stock Unit.    A unit granted to a Grantee pursuant to Section 4 which entitles him to receive a Share or cash on the vesting date, as specified in the Incentive Agreement.

        (ll)    Restriction Period.    The period of time determined by the Committee and set forth in the Incentive Agreement during which the transfer of Restricted Stock by the Grantee is restricted.

        (mm)    Retirement.    The voluntary termination of Employment from the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary constituting retirement for age on any date after the Employee attains the normal retirement age of 62 years, or such other age as may be designated by the Committee in the Employee's Incentive Agreement.

        (nn)    Share.    A share of the Common Stock of the Company.

        (oo)    Share Pool.    The number of shares authorized for issuance under Section 1.4, as adjusted for (i) awards and payouts under Section 1.5 and (ii) changes and adjustments as described in Section 6.6.

        (pp)    Spread.    The difference between the exercise price per Share specified in a SAR grant and the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of exercise of the SAR.

        (qq)    Stock Appreciation Right or SAR.    A Stock Appreciation Right as described in Section 2.5.

        (rr)    Stock Option or Option.    Pursuant to Section 2, (i) an Incentive Stock Option granted to an Employee, or (ii) a Nonstatutory Stock Option granted to an Employee, Consultant or Outside Director, whereunder such option the Grantee has the right to purchase Shares of Common Stock. In accordance with Code Section 422, only an Employee may be granted an Incentive Stock Option.

        (ss)    Subsidiary.    Any company (whether a corporation, partnership, joint venture or other form of entity) in which the Company or a corporation in which the Company owns a majority of the shares of capital stock, directly or indirectly, owns a greater than 50% equity interest except that, with respect to the issuance of Incentive Stock Options, the term "Subsidiary" shall have the same meaning as the term "subsidiary corporation" as defined in Code Section 424(f) as required by Code Section 422.

        (tt)    Supplemental Payment.    Any amount, as described in Sections 2.4, 3.4 and/or 4.3, that is dedicated to payment of income taxes which are payable by the Grantee resulting from an Incentive Award.

I-5


Table of Contents

1.3  Plan Administration

        (a)    Authority of the Committee.    Except as may be limited by law and subject to the provisions herein, the Committee shall have the complete power and authority to (i) select Grantees who shall participate in the Plan; (ii) determine the sizes, duration and types of Incentive Awards; (iii) determine the terms and conditions of Incentive Awards and Incentive Agreements; (iv) determine whether any Shares subject to Incentive Awards will be subject to any restrictions on transfer; (v) construe and interpret the Plan and any Incentive Agreement or other agreement entered into under the Plan; and (vi) establish, amend, or waive rules for the Plan's administration. Further, the Committee shall make all other determinations which may be necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan.

        (b)    Meetings.    The Committee shall designate a chairman from among its members who shall preside at its meetings, and shall designate a secretary, without regard to whether that person is a member of the Committee, who shall keep the minutes of the proceedings and all records, documents, and data pertaining to its administration of the Plan. Meetings shall be held at such times and places as shall be determined by the Committee and the Committee may hold telephonic meetings. The Committee may take any action otherwise proper under the Plan by the affirmative vote, taken with or without a meeting, of a majority of its members. The Committee may authorize any one or more of its members or any officer of the Company to execute and deliver documents on behalf of the Committee.

        (c)    Decisions Binding.    All determinations and decisions of the Committee shall be made in its discretion pursuant to the provisions of the Plan, and shall be final, conclusive and binding on all persons including the Company, its shareholders, Employees, Grantees, and their estates and beneficiaries. The Committee's decisions and determinations with respect to any Incentive Award need not be uniform and may be made selectively among Incentive Awards and Grantees, whether or not such Incentive Awards are similar or such Grantees are similarly situated.

        (d)    Modification of Outstanding Incentive Awards.    Subject to the shareholder approval requirements of Section 7.7 if applicable, the Committee may, in its discretion, provide for the extension of the exercisability of an Incentive Award, accelerate the vesting or exercisability of an Incentive Award, eliminate or make less restrictive any restrictions contained in an Incentive Award, waive any restriction or other provisions of an Incentive Award, or otherwise amend or modify an Incentive Award in any manner that (i) is not adverse to the Grantee to whom such Incentive Award was granted, (ii) is consented to by such Grantee, (iii) does not cause the Incentive Award to provide for the deferral of compensation in a manner that does not comply with Code Section 409A (unless otherwise determined by the Committee), or (iv) does not contravene the requirements of the Performance-Based Exception under Code Section 162(m). With respect to an Incentive Award that is an ISO, no adjustment thereto shall be made to the extent constituting a "modification" within the meaning of Code Section 424(h)(3) unless otherwise agreed to by the Grantee in writing. Notwithstanding the above provisions of this subsection, no amendment or modification of an Incentive Award shall be made to the extent such modification results in any Stock Option with an exercise price less than 100% of the Fair Market Value per Share on the date of grant (110% for Grantees of ISOs who are 10% or greater shareholders pursuant to Section 1.7(b)).

        (e)    Delegation of Authority.    The Committee may delegate to designated officers or other employees of the Company any of its duties and authority under the Plan pursuant to such conditions or limitations as the Committee may establish from time to time, including, without limitation, the authority to recommend Grantees and the forms and terms of their Incentive Awards; provided, however, the Committee may not delegate to any person the authority (i) to grant Incentive Awards, (ii) if the Company is a Publicly Held Corporation, to take any action which would contravene the requirements of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, the Performance-Based Exception under Code Section 162(m), or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or (iii) to recommend himself as a Grantee, or to determine the form or terms of his own Incentive Award.

I-6


Table of Contents

        (f)    Expenses of Committee.    The Committee may employ legal counsel, including, without limitation, independent legal counsel and counsel regularly employed by the Company, and other agents as the Committee may deem appropriate for the administration of the Plan. The Committee may rely upon any opinion or computation received from any such counsel or agent. All expenses incurred by the Committee in interpreting and administering the Plan, including, without limitation, meeting expenses and professional fees, shall be paid by the Company.

        (g)    Surrender of Previous Incentive Awards.    The Committee may, in its discretion, grant Incentive Awards to Grantees on the condition that such Grantees surrender to the Committee for cancellation such other Incentive Awards (including, without limitation, Incentive Awards with higher exercise prices) as the Committee directs. Incentive Awards granted on the condition precedent of surrender of outstanding Incentive Awards shall not count against the limits set forth in Section 1.4 until such time as such previous Incentive Awards are surrendered and cancelled. No surrender of Incentive Awards shall be made under this Section 1.3(g) if such surrender causes any Incentive Award to provide for the deferral of compensation in a manner that is subject to taxation under Code Section 409A (unless otherwise determined by the Committee).

        (h)    Indemnification.    Each person who is or was a member of the Committee shall be indemnified by the Company against and from any damage, loss, liability, cost and expense that may be imposed upon or reasonably incurred by him in connection with or resulting from any claim, action, suit, or proceeding to which he may be a party or in which he may be involved by reason of any action taken or failure to act under the Plan, except for any such act or omission constituting willful misconduct or gross negligence. Each such person shall be indemnified by the Company for all amounts paid by him in settlement thereof, with the Company's approval, or paid by him in satisfaction of any judgment in any such action, suit, or proceeding against him, provided he shall give the Company an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the same before he undertakes to handle and defend it on his own behalf. The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification to which such persons may be entitled (i) under the Company's Articles or Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws, (ii) pursuant to any separate indemnification or hold harmless agreement with the Company, (iii) as a matter of law, contract or otherwise, or (iv) any power that the Company may have to indemnify them or hold them harmless.

1.4  Shares of Common Stock Available for Incentive Awards

        Subject to adjustment under Section 6.6, there shall be available for Incentive Awards that are granted wholly or partly in Common Stock (including rights or Stock Options that may be exercised for or settled in Common Stock) nine million two hundred twenty-five thousand eight hundred seventy-four (9,225,874) Shares of Common Stock. Pursuant to Section 1.5, the number of Shares that are the subject of Incentive Awards under this Plan, which are forfeited or terminated, expire unexercised, are settled in cash in lieu of Common Stock or in a manner such that all or some of the Shares covered by an Incentive Award are not issued to a Grantee or are exchanged for Incentive Awards that do not involve Common Stock, shall again immediately become available for Incentive Awards hereunder. The aggregate number of Shares which may be issued upon exercise of ISOs shall be all of the Shares reserved pursuant to the first sentence of this paragraph. For purposes of counting Shares against the ISO maximum number of reserved Shares, the net number of Shares issued pursuant to the exercise of an ISO shall be counted. The Committee may from time to time adopt and observe such procedures concerning the counting of Shares against the Plan maximum as it may deem appropriate.

        During any period that the Company is a Publicly Held Corporation, then unless the Committee determines that a particular Incentive Award granted to a Covered Employee is not intended to comply

I-7


Table of Contents


with the Performance-Based Exception, the following rules shall apply to grants of Incentive Awards to Covered Employees:

        (a)   Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 6.6, the maximum aggregate number of Shares of Common Stock attributable to Incentive Awards paid out in Shares that may be granted (in the case of Stock Options and SARs) or that may vest (in the case of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units or Other Stock-Based Awards), as applicable, in any calendar year pursuant to any Incentive Award held by any individual Covered Employee shall be two million seven hundred sixty-seven thousand seven hundred sixty-two (2,767,762).

        (b)   The maximum aggregate cash payout (with respect to any Incentive Awards paid out in cash) in any calendar year which may be made to any Covered Employee shall be two million dollars ($2,000,000.00).

        (c)   With respect to any Stock Option or SAR granted to a Covered Employee that is canceled or repriced, the number of Shares subject to such Stock Option or SAR shall continue to count against the maximum number of Shares that may be the subject of Stock Options or SARs granted to such Covered Employee hereunder and, in this regard, such maximum number shall be determined in accordance with Code Section 162(m).

        (d)   The limitations of subsections (a), (b) and (c) above shall be construed and administered so as to comply with the Performance-Based Exception.

1.5  Share Pool Adjustments for Awards and Payouts

        The following Incentive Awards and payouts shall reduce, on a one Share for one Share basis, the number of Shares authorized for issuance under the Share Pool:

        The following transactions shall restore, on a one Share for one Share basis, the number of Shares authorized for issuance under the Share Pool:

        (a)   A payout of a Restricted Stock Award, Restricted Stock Unit, SAR, or Other Stock-Based Award in the form of cash and not Shares (but not the "cashless" exercise of a Stock Option with a broker, as provided in Section 2.3(a));

        (b)   A cancellation, termination, expiration, forfeiture, or lapse for any reason of any Shares subject to an Incentive Award; and

        (c)   Payment of an Option Price by withholding Shares which otherwise would be acquired on exercise (i.e., the Share Pool shall be increased by the number of Shares withheld in payment of the Option Price).

1.6  Common Stock Available

        The Common Stock available for issuance or transfer under the Plan shall be made available from Shares now or hereafter (a) held in the treasury of the Company, (b) authorized but unissued shares, or (c) Shares to be purchased or acquired by the Company. No fractional shares shall be issued under the Plan; payment for fractional shares shall be made in cash.

I-8


Table of Contents

1.7  Participation

        (a)    Eligibility.    The Committee shall from time to time designate those Employees, Consultants and/or Outside Directors, if any, to be granted Incentive Awards under the Plan, the type of Incentive Awards granted, the number of Shares, Stock Options, rights or units, as the case may be, which shall be granted to each such person, and any other terms or conditions relating to the Incentive Awards as it may deem appropriate to the extent consistent with the provisions of the Plan. A Grantee who has been granted an Incentive Award may, if otherwise eligible, be granted additional Incentive Awards at any time.

        (b)    Incentive Stock Option Eligibility.    No Consultant or Outside Director shall be eligible for the grant of any Incentive Stock Option. In addition, no Employee shall be eligible for the grant of any Incentive Stock Option who owns or would own immediately before the grant of such Incentive Stock Option, directly or indirectly, stock possessing more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company, or any Parent or Subsidiary. This restriction does not apply if, at the time such Incentive Stock Option is granted, the Incentive Stock Option exercise price is at least one hundred and ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value on the date of grant and the Incentive Stock Option by its terms is not exercisable after the expiration of five (5) years from the date of grant. For the purpose of the immediately preceding sentence, the attribution rules of Code Section 424(d) shall apply for the purpose of determining an Employee's percentage ownership in the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary. This paragraph shall be construed consistent with the requirements of Code Section 422.

1.8  Types of Incentive Awards

        The types of Incentive Awards under the Plan are Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights and Supplemental Payments as described in Section 2, Restricted Stock Awards and Supplemental Payments as described in Section 3, Restricted Stock Units and Other Stock-Based Awards and Supplemental Payments as described in Section 4, or any combination of the foregoing.


SECTION 2.

STOCK OPTIONS AND STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS

2.1  Grant of Stock Options

        The Committee is authorized to grant (a) Nonstatutory Stock Options to Employees, Consultants and/or Outside Directors and (b) Incentive Stock Options to Employees only, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Plan, and with such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the Plan, as the Committee shall determine in its discretion. Successive grants may be made to the same Grantee regardless whether any Stock Option previously granted to such person remains unexercised. Any Stock Options granted under the Plan are intended to satisfy the requirements of Code Section 409A to the effect that such Stock Options do not provide for the deferral of compensation that is subject to taxation under Code Section 409A.

2.2  Stock Option Terms

        (a)    Written Agreement.    Each grant of a Stock Option shall be evidenced by a written Incentive Agreement. Among its other provisions, each Incentive Agreement shall set forth the extent to which the Grantee shall have the right to exercise the Stock Option following termination of the Grantee's Employment. Such provisions shall be determined in the discretion of the Committee, shall be included in the Grantee's Incentive Agreement, and need not be uniform among all Stock Options issued pursuant to the Plan.

I-9


Table of Contents

        (b)    Number of Shares.    Each Stock Option shall specify the number of Shares of Common Stock to which it pertains, which number is fixed upon the date of grant except as provided under Section 6.6.

        (c)    Exercise Price.    The exercise price per Share of Common Stock under each Stock Option shall be (i) never less than 100% of the Fair Market Value per Share on the date the Stock Option is granted and (ii) specified in the Incentive Agreement; provided, however, if the Grantee of an ISO is a 10% or greater shareholder pursuant to Section 1.7(b), the exercise price for the ISO shall never be less than 110% of the Fair Market Value on the date of grant. Each Stock Option shall specify the method of exercise which shall be consistent with Section 2.3(a).

        (d)    Term.    In the Incentive Agreement, the Committee shall fix the term of each Stock Option which shall not be more than (i) ten (10) years from the date of grant, or (ii) five (5) years from the date of grant for an ISO granted to 10% or greater shareholder pursuant to Section 1.7(b).

        (e)    Exercise.    The Committee shall determine the time or times at which a Stock Option may be exercised, in whole or in part. Each Stock Option may specify the required period of continuous Employment and/or the Performance Criteria to be achieved before the Stock Option or portion thereof will become exercisable. Each Stock Option, the exercise of which, or the timing of the exercise of which, is dependent, in whole or in part, on the achievement of designated Performance Criteria, may specify a minimum level of achievement in respect of the specified Performance Criteria below which no Stock Options will be exercisable and a method for determining the number of Stock Options that will be exercisable if performance is at or above such minimum but short of full achievement of the Performance Criteria. All such terms and conditions shall be set forth in the Incentive Agreement.

        (f)    $100,000 Annual Limit on Incentive Stock Options.    Notwithstanding any contrary provision in the Plan, a Stock Option designated as an ISO shall be an ISO only to the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the time the ISO is granted) of the Shares of Common Stock with respect to which ISOs are exercisable for the first time by the Grantee during any single calendar year (under the Plan and any other stock option plans of the Company and its Subsidiaries or Parent) does not exceed $100,000. This limitation shall be applied by taking ISOs into account in the order in which they were granted and shall be construed in accordance with Section 422(d) of the Code. To the extent that a Stock Option intended to constitute an ISO exceeds the $100,000 limitation (or any other limitation under Code Section 422), the portion of the Stock Option that exceeds the $100,000 limitation (or violates any other limitation under Code Section 422) shall be deemed a Nonstatutory Stock Option. In such event, all other terms and provisions of such Stock Option grant shall remain unchanged.

2.3  Stock Option Exercises

        (a)    Method of Exercise and Payment.    Stock Options shall be exercised by the delivery of a signed written notice of exercise to the Company, which must be received as of a date set by the Company in advance of the effective date of the proposed exercise. The notice shall set forth the number of Shares with respect to which the Stock Option is to be exercised, accompanied by full payment for the Shares.

        The Option Price upon exercise of any Stock Option shall be payable to the Company in full either: (i) in cash or its equivalent; or (ii) subject to prior approval by the Committee in its discretion, by tendering previously acquired Shares having an aggregate Fair Market Value at the time of exercise equal to the Option Price, (iii) subject to prior approval by the Committee in its discretion, by withholding Shares which otherwise would be acquired on exercise having an aggregate Fair Market Value at the time of exercise equal to the total Option Price; or (iv) subject to prior approval by the Committee in its discretion, by a combination of (i), (ii), and (iii) above.

        Any payment in Shares shall be effected by the surrender of such Shares to the Company in good form for transfer and shall be valued at their Fair Market Value on the date when the Stock Option is

I-10


Table of Contents


exercised. Unless otherwise permitted by the Committee in its discretion, the Grantee shall not surrender, or attest to the ownership of, Shares in payment of the Option Price if such action would cause the Company to recognize compensation expense (or additional compensation expense) with respect to the Stock Option for financial accounting reporting purposes.

        The Committee, in its discretion, also may allow the Option Price to be paid with such other consideration as shall constitute lawful consideration for the issuance of Shares (including, without limitation, effecting a "cashless exercise" with a broker of the Option), subject to applicable securities law restrictions and tax withholdings, or by any other means which the Committee determines to be consistent with the Plan's purpose and applicable law. At the direction of the Grantee, the broker will either (i) sell all of the Shares received when the Option is exercised and pay the Grantee the proceeds of the sale (minus the Option Price, withholding taxes and any fees due to the broker); or (ii) sell enough of the Shares received upon exercise of the Option to cover the Option Price, withholding taxes and any fees due the broker and deliver to the Grantee (either directly or through the Company) a stock certificate for the remaining Shares. Dispositions to a broker effecting a cashless exercise are not exempt under Section 16 of the Exchange Act if the Company is a Publicly Held Corporation. Moreover, in no event will the Committee allow the Option Price to be paid with a form of consideration, including a loan or a "cashless exercise," if such form of consideration would violate the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as determined by the Committee.

        As soon as practicable after receipt of a written notification of exercise and full payment, the Company shall deliver, or cause to be delivered, to or on behalf of the Grantee, in the name of the Grantee or other appropriate recipient, evidence of ownership for the number of Shares purchased under the Stock Option.

        Subject to Section 6.4, during the lifetime of a Grantee, each Option granted to the Grantee shall be exercisable only by the Grantee (or his legal guardian in the event of his Disability) or by a broker-dealer acting on his behalf pursuant to a cashless exercise under the foregoing provisions of this Section 2.3(a).

        (b)    Restrictions on Share Transferability.    The Committee may impose such restrictions on any grant of Stock Options or on any Shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of a Stock Option as it may deem advisable, including, without limitation, restrictions under (i) any shareholders' agreement, buy/sell agreement, right of first refusal, non-competition, and any other agreement between the Company and any of its securities holders or employees; (ii) any applicable federal securities laws; (iii) the requirements of any stock exchange or market upon which such Shares are then listed and/or traded; or (iv) any blue sky or state securities law applicable to such Shares. Any certificate issued to evidence Shares issued upon the exercise of an Incentive Award may bear such legends and statements as the Committee shall deem advisable to assure compliance with applicable federal and state laws and regulations.

        Any Grantee or other person exercising an Incentive Award shall be required, if requested by the Committee, to give a written representation that the Incentive Award and the Shares subject to the Incentive Award will be acquired for investment and not with a view to public distribution; provided, however, that the Committee, in its discretion, may release any person receiving an Incentive Award from any such representations either prior to or subsequent to the exercise of the Incentive Award.

        (c)    Notification of Disqualifying Disposition of Shares from Incentive Stock Options.    Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, a Grantee who disposes of Shares of Common Stock acquired upon the exercise of an Incentive Stock Option by a sale or exchange either (i) within two (2) years after the date of the grant of the Incentive Stock Option under which the Shares were acquired or (ii) within one (1) year after the transfer of such Shares to him pursuant to exercise, shall promptly notify the Company of such disposition, the amount realized and his adjusted basis in such Shares.

I-11


Table of Contents

        (d)    Proceeds of Option Exercise.    The proceeds received by the Company from the sale of Shares pursuant to Stock Options exercised under the Plan shall be used for general corporate purposes.

2.4  Supplemental Payment on Exercise of Nonstatutory Stock Options

        The Committee, either at the time of grant or exercise of any Nonstatutory Stock Option, may provide in the Incentive Agreement for a Supplemental Payment by the Company to the Grantee with respect to the exercise of any Nonstatutory Stock Option. The Supplemental Payment shall be in the amount specified by the Committee, which amount shall not exceed the amount necessary to pay the federal and state income tax payable with respect to both the exercise of the Nonstatutory Stock Option and the receipt of the Supplemental Payment, assuming the holder is taxed at either the maximum effective income tax rate applicable thereto or at a lower tax rate as deemed appropriate by the Committee in its discretion. No Supplemental Payments will be made with respect to any SARs or ISOs.

2.5  Stock Appreciation Rights

        (a)    Grant.    The Committee may grant Stock Appreciation Rights to any Employee, Consultant or Outside Director. Any SARs granted under the Plan are intended to satisfy the requirements under Code Section 409A to the effect that such SARs do not provide for the deferral of compensation that is subject to taxation under Code Section 409A.

        (b)    General Provisions.    The terms and conditions of each SAR shall be evidenced by an Incentive Agreement. The exercise price per Share shall not be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the grant date of the SAR. The term of the SAR shall be determined by the Committee but shall not be greater than ten (10) years from the date of grant. The Committee cannot include any feature for the deferral of compensation other than the deferral of recognition of income until exercise of the SAR.

        (c)    Exercise.    SARs shall be exercisable subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee shall specify in the Incentive Agreement for the SAR grant. No SAR granted to an Insider may be exercised prior to six (6) months from the date of grant, except in the event of his death or Disability which occurs prior to the expiration of such six-month period if so permitted under the Incentive Agreement.

        (d)    Settlement.    Upon exercise of the SAR, the Grantee shall receive an amount equal to the Spread. The Spread, less applicable withholdings, shall be payable only in cash or in Shares, or a combination of both, as specified in the Incentive Agreement, within 30 calendar days of the exercise date. In addition, the Incentive Agreement under which such SARs are awarded, or any other agreements or arrangements, shall not provide that the Company will purchase any Shares delivered to the Grantee as a result of the exercise or vesting of a SAR.


SECTION 3.

RESTRICTED STOCK

3.1  Award of Restricted Stock

        (a)    Grant.    With respect to a Grantee who is an Employee, Consultant or Outside Director, Shares of Restricted Stock, which may be designated as a Performance-Based Award in the discretion of the Committee, may be awarded by the Committee with such restrictions during the Restriction Period as the Committee shall designate in its discretion. Any such restrictions may differ with respect to a particular Grantee. Restricted Stock shall be awarded for no additional consideration or such additional consideration as the Committee may determine, which consideration may be less than, equal to or more than the Fair Market Value of the shares of Restricted Stock on the grant date. The terms

I-12


Table of Contents

and conditions of each grant of Restricted Stock shall be evidenced by an Incentive Agreement and, during the Restriction Period, such Shares of Restricted Stock must remain subject to a "substantial risk of forfeiture" within the meaning given to such term under Code Section 83. Any Restricted Stock granted under the Plan is intended to satisfy the requirements of Code Section 409A to the effect that such Restricted Stock does not provide for the deferral of compensation that is subject to taxation under Code Section 409A. Any Restricted Stock Award may, at the time of grant, be designated by the Committee as a Performance-Based Award that is intended to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception.

        (b)    Immediate Transfer Without Immediate Delivery of Restricted Stock.    Unless otherwise specified in the Grantee's Incentive Agreement, each Restricted Stock Award shall constitute an immediate transfer of the record and beneficial ownership of the Shares of Restricted Stock to the Grantee in consideration of the performance of services as an Employee, Consultant or Outside Director, as applicable, entitling such Grantee to all voting and other ownership rights in such Shares.

        As specified in the Incentive Agreement, a Restricted Stock Award may limit the Grantee's dividend rights during the Restriction Period in which the shares of Restricted Stock are subject to a "substantial risk of forfeiture" (within the meaning given to such term under Code Section 83) and restrictions on transfer. In the Incentive Agreement, the Committee may apply any restrictions to the dividends that the Committee deems appropriate. Without limiting the generality of the preceding sentence, if the grant or vesting of Shares of a Restricted Stock Award granted to a Covered Employee, is designed to comply with the requirements of the Performance-Based Exception, the Committee may apply any restrictions it deems appropriate to the payment of dividends declared with respect to such Shares of Restricted Stock, such that the dividends and/or the Shares of Restricted Stock maintain eligibility for the Performance-Based Exception. In the event that any dividend constitutes a derivative security or an equity security pursuant to the rules under Section 16 of the Exchange Act, if applicable, such dividend shall be subject to a vesting period equal to the remaining vesting period of the Shares of Restricted Stock with respect to which the dividend is paid.

        Shares awarded pursuant to a grant of Restricted Stock, whether or not under a Performance-Based Award, may be issued in the name of the Grantee and held, together with a stock power endorsed in blank, by the Committee or Company (or their delegates) or in trust or in escrow pursuant to an agreement satisfactory to the Committee, as determined by the Committee, until such time as the restrictions on transfer have expired. All such terms and conditions shall be set forth in the particular Grantee's Incentive Agreement. The Company or Committee (or their delegates) shall issue to the Grantee a receipt evidencing the certificates held by it which are registered in the name of the Grantee.

3.2  Restrictions

        (a)    Forfeiture of Restricted Stock.    Restricted Stock awarded to a Grantee may be subject to the following restrictions until the expiration of the Restriction Period: (i) a restriction that constitutes a "substantial risk of forfeiture" (as defined in Code Section 83), and a restriction on transferability; (ii) unless otherwise specified by the Committee in the Incentive Agreement, the Restricted Stock that is subject to restrictions which are not satisfied shall be forfeited and all rights of the Grantee to such Shares shall terminate; and (iii) any other restrictions that the Committee determines in advance are appropriate, including, without limitation, rights of repurchase or first refusal in the Company or provisions subjecting the Restricted Stock to a continuing substantial risk of forfeiture in the hands of any transferee. Any such restrictions shall be set forth in the particular Grantee's Incentive Agreement.

        (b)    Issuance of Certificates.    Reasonably promptly after the date of grant with respect to Shares of Restricted Stock, the Company shall cause to be issued a stock certificate, registered in the name of the Grantee to whom such Shares of Restricted Stock were granted, evidencing such Shares; provided,

I-13


Table of Contents


however, that the Company shall not cause to be issued such a stock certificate unless it has received a stock power duly endorsed in blank with respect to such Shares. Each such stock certificate shall bear the following legend or any other legend approved by the Company:

Such legend shall not be removed from the certificate evidencing such Shares of Restricted Stock unless and until such Shares vest pursuant to the terms of the Incentive Agreement.

        (c)    Removal of Restrictions.    The Committee, in its discretion, shall have the authority to remove any or all of the restrictions on the Restricted Stock if it determines that, by reason of a change in applicable law or another change in circumstance arising after the grant date of the Restricted Stock, such action is necessary or appropriate.

3.3  Delivery of Shares of Common Stock

        Subject to withholding taxes under Section 7.3 and to the terms of the Incentive Agreement, a stock certificate evidencing the Shares of Restricted Stock with respect to which the restrictions in the Incentive Agreement have been satisfied shall be delivered to the Grantee or other appropriate recipient free of restrictions.

3.4  Supplemental Payment on Vesting of Restricted Stock

        The Committee, either at the time of grant or vesting of Restricted Stock, may provide for a Supplemental Payment by the Company to the holder in an amount specified by the Committee, which amount shall not exceed the amount necessary to pay the federal and state income tax payable with respect to both the vesting of the Restricted Stock and receipt of the Supplemental Payment, assuming the Grantee is taxed at either the maximum effective income tax rate applicable thereto or at a lower tax rate as deemed appropriate by the Committee in its discretion. The Supplemental Payment, if granted, shall be paid in a lump sum at the time specified in the Grantee's Incentive Agreement.


SECTION 4.

OTHER STOCK-BASED AWARDS

4.1  Grant of Other Stock-Based Awards

        Other Stock-Based Awards may be awarded by the Committee to Grantees that are payable in Shares or in cash, as determined in the discretion of the Committee to be consistent with the goals of the Company. Other types of Stock-Based Awards that are payable in Shares include, without limitation, purchase rights, Shares awarded that are not subject to any restrictions or conditions, Shares awarded subject to the satisfaction of specified Performance Criteria, convertible or exchangeable debentures, other rights convertible into Shares, Incentive Awards valued by reference to the performance of a specified Subsidiary, division or department of the Company, and settlement in cancellation of rights of any person with a vested interest in any other plan, fund, program or arrangement that is or was sponsored, maintained or participated in by the Company (or any Parent or Subsidiary). As is the case with other types of Incentive Awards, Other Stock-Based Awards may be awarded either alone or in addition to or in conjunction with any other Incentive Awards. Other Stock-Based Awards that are payable in Shares are not intended to be deferred compensation subject to taxation under Code Section 409A, unless otherwise determined by the Committee at the time of grant and specified in the Grantee's Incentive Agreement, which shall set forth the time and form of

I-14


Table of Contents


payment thereunder, in addition to such other terms that are required for deferred compensation subject to Code Section 409A.

        In addition to Other Stock-Based Awards that are payable in Shares, the Committee may award Restricted Stock Units to a Grantee that are payable in Shares or cash, or in a combination thereof. Restricted Stock Units are not intended to be deferred compensation that is subject to Code Section 409A. During the period beginning on the date such Incentive Award is granted and ending on the payment date specified in the Incentive Agreement, the Grantee's right to payment under the Incentive Agreement must remain subject to a "substantial risk of forfeiture" within the meaning of such term under Code Section 409A. In addition, payment to the Grantee under the Incentive Agreement shall be made within two and one-half months (21/2) months following the end of the calendar year in which the substantial risk of forfeiture lapses unless an earlier payment date is specified in the Incentive Agreement.

4.2  Other Stock-Based Award Terms

        (a)    Written Agreement.    The terms and conditions of each grant of an Other Stock-Based Award shall be evidenced by an Incentive Agreement.

        (b)    Purchase Price.    Except to the extent that an Other Stock-Based Award is granted in substitution for an outstanding Incentive Award or is delivered upon exercise of a Stock Option, the amount of consideration required to be received by the Company shall be either (i) no consideration other than services rendered (in the case of authorized and unissued shares), or to be rendered, by the Grantee, or (ii) as otherwise specified in the Incentive Agreement.

        (c)    Performance Criteria and Other Terms.    The Committee may specify Performance Criteria for (i) vesting in Other Stock-Based Awards and (ii) payment thereof to the Grantee, as it may determine in its discretion. The extent to which any such Performance Criteria have been met shall be determined and certified by the Committee in accordance with the requirements to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception under Code Section 162(m). All terms and conditions of Other Stock-Based Awards shall be determined by the Committee and set forth in the Incentive Agreement.

4.3  Supplemental Payment on Other Stock-Based Awards

        The Committee, either at the time of grant or vesting of an Other Stock-Based Award, may provide for a Supplemental Payment by the Company to the holder in an amount specified by the Committee, which amount shall not exceed the amount necessary to pay the federal and state income tax payable with respect to both the vesting of the Other Stock-Based Award and receipt of the Supplemental Payment, assuming the Grantee is taxed at either the maximum effective income tax rate applicable thereto or at a lower tax rate as deemed appropriate by the Committee in its discretion. The Supplemental Payment, if granted, shall be paid in a lump sum at the time specified within the Grantee's Incentive Agreement.

I-15


Table of Contents


SECTION 5.

PERFORMANCE-BASED AWARDS AND PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

        As determined by the Committee at the time of grant, Performance-Based Awards may be granted subject to performance objectives relating to one or more of the following within the meaning of Code Section 162(m) (the "Performance Criteria") in order to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception:

        Performance Criteria may be stated in absolute terms or relative to comparison companies or indices to be achieved during a Performance Period. In the Incentive Agreement, the Committee shall establish one or more Performance Criteria for each Incentive Award that is intended to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception on its grant date.

        In establishing the Performance Criteria for each applicable Incentive Award, the Committee may provide that the effect of specified extraordinary or unusual events will be included or excluded

I-16


Table of Contents


(including, but not limited to, items of gain, loss or expense determined to be extraordinary or unusual in nature or infrequent in occurrence, or related to the disposal of a segment of business or a change in accounting principle, each as determined in accordance with the standards under Opinion No. 30 of the Accounting Principles Board (APB Opinion 30) or any successor or other authoritative financial accounting standards, as determined by the Committee). The terms of the stated Performance Criteria for each applicable Incentive Award, whether for a Performance Period of one (1) year or multiple years, must preclude the Committee's discretion to increase the amount payable to any Grantee that would otherwise be due upon attainment of the Performance Criteria, but may permit the Committee to reduce the amount otherwise payable to the Grantee in the Committee's discretion.

        The Performance Criteria specified in any Incentive Agreement need not be applicable to all Incentive Awards, and may be particular to an individual Grantee's function or business unit. The Committee may establish the Performance Criteria of the Company (or any entity which is affiliated by common ownership with the Company) as determined and designated by the Committee, in its discretion, in the Incentive Agreement.

        Performance-Based Awards will be granted in the discretion of the Committee and will be (a) sufficiently objective so that an independent person or entity having knowledge of the relevant facts could determine the amount payable to Grantee, if applicable, and whether the pre-determined goals have been achieved with respect to the Incentive Award, (b) established at a time when the performance outcome is substantially uncertain, (c) established in writing no later than ninety (90) days after the commencement of the Performance Period to which they apply, and (d) based on operating earnings, performance against peers, earnings criteria or such other criteria as provided in this Section 5.


SECTION 6.

PROVISIONS RELATING TO PLAN PARTICIPATION

6.1  Incentive Agreement

        Each Grantee to whom an Incentive Award is granted shall be required to enter into an Incentive Agreement with the Company, in such a form as is provided by the Committee. The Incentive Agreement shall contain specific terms as determined by the Committee, in its discretion, with respect to the Grantee's particular Incentive Award. Such terms need not be uniform among all Grantees or any similarly situated Grantees. The Incentive Agreement may include, without limitation, vesting, forfeiture and other provisions particular to the particular Grantee's Incentive Award, as well as, for example, provisions to the effect that the Grantee (a) shall not disclose any confidential information acquired during Employment with the Company, (b) shall abide by all the terms and conditions of the Plan and such other terms and conditions as may be imposed by the Committee, (c) shall not interfere with the Employment or other service of any employee, (d) shall not compete with the Company or become involved in a conflict of interest with the interests of the Company, (e) shall forfeit an Incentive Award if terminated for Cause, (f) shall not be permitted to make an election under Code Section 83(b) when applicable, and (g) shall be subject to any other agreement between the Grantee and the Company regarding Shares that may be acquired under an Incentive Award including, without limitation, a shareholders' agreement, buy-sell agreement, or other agreement restricting the transferability of Shares by Grantee. An Incentive Agreement shall include such terms and conditions as are determined by the Committee, in its discretion, to be appropriate with respect to any individual Grantee. The Incentive Agreement shall be signed by the Grantee to whom the Incentive Award is made and by an Authorized Officer.

I-17


Table of Contents

6.2  No Right to Employment

        Nothing in the Plan or any instrument executed pursuant to the Plan shall create any Employment rights (including without limitation, rights to continued Employment) in any Grantee or affect the right of the Company to terminate the Employment of any Grantee at any time without regard to the existence of the Plan.

6.3  Securities Requirements

        The Company shall be under no obligation to effect the registration of any Shares to be issued hereunder pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 or to effect similar compliance under any state securities laws. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Company shall not be obligated to cause to be issued or delivered any certificates evidencing Shares pursuant to the Plan unless and until the Company is advised by its counsel that the issuance and delivery of such certificates is in compliance with federal securities laws or other applicable laws, provided that payment shall be made at the earliest date at which the Company reasonably anticipates that the making of the payment will not cause a violation of such laws. The Committee may require, as a condition of the issuance and delivery of certificates evidencing Shares pursuant to the terms hereof, that the recipient of such Shares make such covenants, agreements and representations, and that such certificates bear such legends, as the Committee, in its discretion, deems necessary to comply with federal securities laws or other applicable law.

        The Committee may, in its discretion, defer the effectiveness of any exercise of an Incentive Award in order to allow the issuance of Shares to be made pursuant to registration or an exemption from registration or other methods for compliance available under federal or state securities laws. The Committee shall inform the Grantee in writing of its decision to defer the effectiveness of the exercise of an Incentive Award. During the period that the effectiveness of the exercise of an Incentive Award has been deferred, the Grantee may, by written notice to the Committee, withdraw such exercise and obtain the refund of any amount paid with respect thereto.

        If the Shares issuable on exercise of an Incentive Award are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, the Company may imprint on the certificate for such Shares the following legend or any other legend which counsel for the Company considers necessary or advisable to comply with the Securities Act of 1933:

6.4  Transferability

        Incentive Awards granted under the Plan shall not be transferable or assignable other than: (a) by will or the laws of descent and distribution or (b) pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order (as defined under Code Section 414(p)); provided, however, only with respect to Incentive Awards consisting of Nonstatutory Stock Options, the Committee may, in its discretion, authorize all or a portion of the Nonstatutory Stock Options to be granted on terms which permit transfer by the Grantee to (i) the members of the Grantee's Immediate Family, (ii) a trust or trusts for the exclusive benefit of Immediate Family members, (iii) a partnership in which such Immediate Family members are

I-18


Table of Contents


the only partners, or (iv) any other entity owned solely by Immediate Family members; provided that (A) there may be no consideration for any such transfer, (B) the Incentive Agreement pursuant to which such Nonstatutory Stock Options are granted must be approved by the Committee, and must expressly provide for transferability in a manner consistent with this Section 6.4, (C) subsequent transfers of transferred Nonstatutory Stock Options shall be prohibited except in accordance with clauses (a) and (b) (above) of this sentence, and (D) there may be no transfer of any Incentive Award in a listed transaction as described in IRS Notice 2003-47. Following any permitted transfer, the Nonstatutory Stock Option shall continue to be subject to the same terms and conditions as were applicable immediately prior to transfer, provided that the term "Grantee" shall be deemed to refer to the transferee. The events of termination of employment, as set out in Section 6.7 and in the Incentive Agreement, shall continue to be applied with respect to the original Grantee, and the Incentive Award shall be exercisable by the transferee only to the extent, and for the periods, specified in the Incentive Agreement.

        Except as may otherwise be permitted under the Code, in the event of a permitted transfer of a Nonstatutory Stock Option hereunder, the original Grantee shall remain subject to withholding taxes upon exercise. In addition, the Company and the Committee shall have no obligation to provide any notices to any Grantee or transferee thereof, including, for example, notice of the expiration of an Incentive Award following the original Grantee's termination of employment.

        The designation by a Grantee of a beneficiary of an Incentive Award shall not constitute transfer of the Incentive Award. No transfer by will or by the laws of descent and distribution shall be effective to bind the Company unless the Committee has been furnished with a copy of the deceased Grantee's enforceable will or such other evidence as the Committee deems necessary to establish the validity of the transfer. Any attempted transfer in violation of this Section 6.4 shall be void and ineffective. All determinations under this Section 6.4 shall be made by the Committee in its discretion.

6.5  Rights as a Shareholder

        (a)    No Shareholder Rights.    Except as otherwise provided in Section 3.1(b) for grants of Restricted Stock, a Grantee of an Incentive Award (or a permitted transferee of such Grantee) shall have no rights as a shareholder with respect to any Shares of Common Stock until the issuance of a stock certificate or other record of ownership for such Shares.

        (b)    Representation of Ownership.    In the case of the exercise of an Incentive Award by a person or estate acquiring the right to exercise such Incentive Award by reason of the death or Disability of a Grantee, the Committee may require reasonable evidence as to the ownership of such Incentive Award or the authority of such person. The Committee may also require such consents and releases of taxing authorities as it deems advisable.

6.6  Change in Stock and Adjustments

        (a)    Changes in Law or Circumstances.    Subject to Section 6.8 (which only applies in the event of a Change in Control), in the event of any change in applicable law or any change in circumstances which results in or would result in any dilution of the rights granted under the Plan, or which otherwise warrants an equitable adjustment because it interferes with the intended operation of the Plan, then, if the Board or Committee should so determine, in its absolute discretion, that such change equitably requires an adjustment in the number or kind of shares of stock or other securities or property theretofore subject, or which may become subject, to issuance or transfer under the Plan or in the terms and conditions of outstanding Incentive Awards, such adjustment shall be made in accordance with such determination. Such adjustments may include changes with respect to (i) the aggregate number of Shares that may be issued under the Plan, (ii) the number of Shares subject to Incentive Awards, and (iii) the Option Price or other price per Share for outstanding Incentive Awards, but shall

I-19


Table of Contents

not result in the grant of any Stock Option with an exercise price less than 100% of the Fair Market Value per Share on the date of grant. The Board or Committee shall give notice to each applicable Grantee of such adjustment which shall be effective and binding.

        (b)    Exercise of Corporate Powers.    The existence of the Plan or outstanding Incentive Awards hereunder shall not affect in any way the right or power of the Company or its shareholders to make or authorize any or all adjustments, recapitalization, reorganization or other changes in the Company's capital structure or its business or any merger or consolidation of the Company, or any issue of bonds, debentures, preferred or prior preference stocks ahead of or affecting the Common Stock or the rights thereof, or the dissolution or liquidation of the Company, or any sale or transfer of all or any part of its assets or business, or any other corporate act or proceeding whether of a similar character or otherwise.

        (c)    Recapitalization of the Company.    Subject to Section 6.8 (which only applies in the event of a Change in Control), if while there are Incentive Awards outstanding, the Company shall effect any subdivision or consolidation of Shares of Common Stock or other capital readjustment, the payment of a stock dividend, stock split, combination of Shares, recapitalization or other increase or reduction in the number of Shares outstanding, without receiving compensation therefor in money, services or property, then the number of Shares available under the Plan and the number of Incentive Awards which may thereafter be exercised shall (i) in the event of an increase in the number of Shares outstanding, be proportionately increased and the Option Price or Fair Market Value of the Incentive Awards awarded shall be proportionately reduced; and (ii) in the event of a reduction in the number of Shares outstanding, be proportionately reduced, and the Option Price or Fair Market Value of the Incentive Awards awarded shall be proportionately increased. The Board or Committee shall take such action and whatever other action it deems appropriate, in its discretion, so that the value of each outstanding Incentive Award to the Grantee shall not be adversely affected by a Corporate Event described in this Section 6.6(c).

        (d)    Issue of Common Stock by the Company.    Except as hereinabove expressly provided in this Section 6.6 and subject to Section 6.8 in the event of a Change in Control, the issue by the Company of shares of stock of any class, or securities convertible into shares of stock of any class, for cash or property, or for labor or services, either upon direct sale or upon the exercise of rights or warrants to subscribe therefor, or upon any conversion of shares or obligations of the Company convertible into such shares or other securities, shall not affect, and no adjustment by reason thereof shall be made with respect to, the number of, or Option Price or Fair Market Value of, any Incentive Awards then outstanding under previously granted Incentive Awards; provided, however, in such event, outstanding Shares of Restricted Stock shall be treated the same as outstanding unrestricted Shares of Common Stock.

        (e)    Assumption under the Plan of Outstanding Stock Options.    Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, the Board or Committee, in its discretion, may authorize the assumption and continuation under the Plan of outstanding and unexercised stock options or other types of stock-based incentive awards that were granted under a stock option plan (or other type of stock incentive plan or agreement) that is or was maintained by a corporation or other entity that was merged into, consolidated with, or whose stock or assets were acquired by, the Company as the surviving corporation. Any such action shall be upon such terms and conditions as the Board or Committee, in its discretion, may deem appropriate, including provisions to preserve the holder's rights under the previously granted and unexercised stock option or other stock-based incentive award; such as, for example, retaining an existing exercise price under an outstanding stock option. Any such assumption and continuation of any such previously granted and unexercised incentive award shall be treated as an outstanding Incentive Award under the Plan and shall thus count against the number of Shares reserved for issuance pursuant to Section 1.4. In addition, any Shares issued by the Company through the assumption or substitution of outstanding grants from an acquired company shall reduce the Shares available for grants under Section 1.4.

I-20


Table of Contents

        (f)    Assumption of Incentive Awards by a Successor.    Subject to the accelerated vesting and other provisions of Section 6.8 that apply in the event of a Change in Control, in the event of a Corporate Event (defined below), each Grantee shall be entitled to receive, in lieu of the number of Shares subject to Incentive Awards, such shares of capital stock or other securities or property as may be issuable or payable with respect to or in exchange for the number of Shares which Grantee would have received had he exercised the Incentive Award immediately prior to such Corporate Event, together with any adjustments (including, without limitation, adjustments to the Option Price and the number of Shares issuable on exercise of outstanding Stock Options). For this purpose, Shares of Restricted Stock shall be treated the same as unrestricted outstanding Shares of Common Stock. A "Corporate Event" means any of the following: (i) a dissolution or liquidation of the Company, (ii) a sale of all or substantially all of the Company's assets, or (iii) a merger, consolidation or combination involving the Company (other than a merger, consolidation or combination (A) in which the Company is the continuing or surviving corporation and (B) which does not result in the outstanding Shares being converted into or exchanged for different securities, cash or other property, or any combination thereof). The Board or Committee shall take whatever other action it deems appropriate to preserve the rights of Grantees holding outstanding Incentive Awards.

        Notwithstanding the previous paragraph of this Section 6.6(f), but subject to the accelerated vesting and other provisions of Section 6.8 that apply in the event of a Change in Control, in the event of a Corporate Event (described in the previous paragraph), the Board or Committee, in its discretion, shall have the right and power to:

        The Board or Committee, in its discretion, shall have the authority to take whatever action it deems to be necessary or appropriate to effectuate the provisions of this Section 6.6(f).

6.7  Termination of Employment, Death, Disability and Retirement

        (a)    Termination of Employment.    Unless otherwise expressly provided in the Grantee's Incentive Agreement or the Plan, if the Grantee's Employment is terminated for any reason other than due to his death, Disability, Retirement or for Cause, any non-vested portion of any Stock Option or other Incentive Award at the time of such termination shall automatically expire and terminate and no further vesting shall occur after the termination date. In such event, except as otherwise expressly

I-21


Table of Contents

provided in his Incentive Agreement, the Grantee shall be entitled to exercise his rights only with respect to the portion of the Incentive Award that was vested as of his termination of Employment date for a period that shall end on the earlier of (i) the expiration date set forth in the Incentive Agreement or (ii) ninety (90) days after the date of his termination of Employment.

        (b)    Termination of Employment for Cause.    Unless otherwise expressly provided in the Grantee's Incentive Agreement or the Plan, in the event of the termination of a Grantee's Employment for Cause, all vested and non-vested Stock Options and other Incentive Awards granted to such Grantee shall immediately expire, and shall not be exercisable to any extent, as of 12:01 a.m. (CST) on the date of such termination of Employment.

        (c)    Retirement.    Unless otherwise expressly provided in the Grantee's Incentive Agreement or the Plan, upon the termination of Employment due to the Grantee's Retirement:

        (d)    Disability or Death.    Unless otherwise expressly provided in the Grantee's Incentive Agreement or the Plan, upon termination of Employment as a result of the Grantee's Disability or death:

        In the case of any vested Incentive Stock Option held by an Employee following termination of Employment, notwithstanding the definition of "Disability" in Section 1.2, whether the Employee has incurred a "Disability" for purposes of determining the length of the Option exercise period following termination of Employment under this Section 6.7(d) shall be determined by reference to Code Section 22(e)(3) to the extent required by Code Section 422(c)(6). The Committee shall determine whether a Disability for purposes of this Section 6.7(d) has occurred.

        (e)    Continuation.    Subject to the conditions and limitations of the Plan and applicable law and regulation in the event that a Grantee ceases to be an Employee, Outside Director or Consultant, as applicable, for whatever reason, the Committee and Grantee may mutually agree with respect to any outstanding Option or other Incentive Award then held by the Grantee (i) for an acceleration or other adjustment in any vesting schedule applicable to the Incentive Award; (ii) for a continuation of the exercise period following termination for a longer period than is otherwise provided under such Incentive Award; or (iii) to any other change in the terms and conditions of the Incentive Award. In the event of any such change to an outstanding Incentive Award, a written amendment to the Grantee's Incentive Agreement shall be required. No amendment to a Grantee's Incentive Award shall be made to the extent compensation payable pursuant thereto as a result of such amendment would be considered deferred compensation subject to taxation under Code Section 409A, unless otherwise determined by the Committee.

I-22


Table of Contents

6.8  Change in Control

        Notwithstanding any contrary provision in the Plan, in the event of a Change in Control (as defined below), the following actions shall automatically occur as of the day immediately preceding the Change in Control date unless expressly provided otherwise in the individual Grantee's Incentive Agreement:

        (a)   all of the Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights then outstanding shall become 100% vested and immediately and fully exercisable;

        (b)   all of the restrictions and conditions of any Restricted Stock Awards, Restricted Stock Units and any Other Stock-Based Awards then outstanding shall be deemed satisfied, and the Restriction Period with respect thereto shall be deemed to have expired, and thus each such Incentive Award shall become free of all restrictions and fully vested; and

        (c)   all of the Performance-Based Awards shall become fully vested, deemed earned in full, and promptly paid within thirty (30) days to the affected Grantees without regard to payment schedules and notwithstanding that the applicable performance cycle, retention cycle or other restrictions and conditions have not been completed or satisfied.

        For all purposes of this Plan, a "Change in Control" of the Company means the occurrence of any one or more of the following events:

        (a)   The acquisition by any individual, entity or group (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act (a "Person")) of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of fifty percent (50%) or more of either (i) the then outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company (the "Outstanding Company Stock") or (ii) the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (the "Outstanding Company Voting Securities"); provided, however, that the following acquisitions shall not constitute a Change in Control: (i) any acquisition directly from the Company or any Subsidiary, (ii) any acquisition by the Company or any Subsidiary or by any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or any Subsidiary, or (iii) any acquisition by any corporation pursuant to a reorganization, merger, consolidation or similar business combination involving the Company (a "Merger"), if, following such Merger, the conditions described in Section 6.8(c) (below) are satisfied;

        (b)   Individuals who, as of the Effective Date, constitute the Board of Directors of the Company (the "Incumbent Board") cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board during a 12-month period; provided, however, that any individual becoming a director subsequent to the Effective Date whose election, or nomination for election by the Company's shareholders, was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board shall be considered as though such individual were a member of the Incumbent Board, but excluding, for this purpose, any such individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of either an actual or threatened election contest (as such terms are used in Rule 14a-11 of Regulation 14A promulgated under the Exchange Act) or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a Person other than the Board;

        (c)   Approval by the shareholders of the Company of a Merger, unless immediately following such Merger, (i) substantially all of the holders of the Outstanding Company Voting Securities immediately prior to Merger beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the common stock of the corporation resulting from such Merger (or its parent corporation) in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of Outstanding Company Voting Securities immediately prior to such Merger and (ii) at least a majority of the members of the board of directors of the corporation resulting from such Merger (or its parent corporation) were members of the Incumbent Board at the time of the execution of the initial agreement providing for such Merger;

I-23


Table of Contents

        (d)   The sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, unless immediately following such sale or other disposition, (i) substantially all of the holders of the Outstanding Company Voting Securities immediately prior to the consummation of such sale or other disposition beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the common stock of the corporation acquiring such assets in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of Outstanding Company Voting Securities immediately prior to the consummation of such sale or disposition, and (ii) at least a majority of the members of the board of directors of such corporation (or its parent corporation) were members of the Incumbent Board at the time of execution of the initial agreement or action of the Board providing for such sale or other disposition of assets of the Company; or

        (e)   The adoption of any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of the Company.

        Notwithstanding the occurrence of any of the foregoing events set out in this Section 6.8 which would otherwise result in a Change in Control, the Board may determine in its discretion, if it deems it to be in the best interest of the Company, that an event or events otherwise constituting or reasonably leading to a Change in Control shall not be deemed a Change in Control hereunder. Such determination shall be effective only if it is made by the Board (i) prior to the occurrence of an event that otherwise would be, or reasonably lead to, a Change in Control, or (ii) after such event only if made by the Board a majority of which is composed of directors who were members of the Board immediately prior to the event that otherwise would be, or reasonably lead to, a Change in Control.

        Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 6.8, to the extent that any payment or acceleration hereunder is subject to Code Section 409A for deferred compensation, then the term Change in Control hereunder shall be construed to have the meaning as set forth in Code Section 409A(2)(A)(v), but only to the extent inconsistent with the foregoing provisions of the Change in Control definition (above) as determined by the Committee.

6.9  Exchange of Incentive Awards

        The Committee may, in its discretion, permit any Grantee to surrender outstanding Incentive Awards in order to exercise or realize his rights under other Incentive Awards or in exchange for the grant of new Incentive Awards, or require holders of Incentive Awards to surrender outstanding Incentive Awards (or comparable rights under other plans or arrangements) as a condition precedent to the grant of new Incentive Awards. No exchange of Incentive Awards shall be made under this Section 6.9 if such surrender causes any Incentive Award to provide for the deferral of compensation in a manner that is subject to taxation under Code Section 409A unless otherwise determined by the Committee.


SECTION 7.

GENERAL

7.1  Effective Date and Grant Period

        The Plan shall be subject to the approval of the shareholders of the Company within twelve (12) months after the Effective Date. Incentive Awards may be granted under the Plan at any time prior to receipt of such shareholder approval; provided, however, if the requisite shareholder approval is not obtained within such 12-month period, any Incentive Awards granted hereunder shall automatically become null and void and of no force or effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any Incentive Award that is intended to satisfy the Performance-Based Exception shall not be granted until the terms of the Plan are disclosed to, and approved by, shareholders of the Company in accordance with the requirements of the Performance-Based Exception.

I-24


Table of Contents

7.2  Funding and Liability of Company

        No provision of the Plan shall require the Company, for the purpose of satisfying any obligations under the Plan, to purchase assets or place any assets in a trust or other entity to which contributions are made, or otherwise to segregate any assets. In addition, the Company shall not be required to maintain separate bank accounts, books, records or other evidence of the existence of a segregated or separately maintained or administered fund for purposes of the Plan. Although bookkeeping accounts may be established with respect to Grantees who are entitled to cash, Common Stock or rights thereto under the Plan, any such accounts shall be used merely as a bookkeeping convenience. The Company shall not be required to segregate any assets that may at any time be represented by cash, Common Stock or rights thereto. The Plan shall not be construed as providing for such segregation, nor shall the Company, the Board or the Committee be deemed to be a trustee of any cash, Common Stock or rights thereto. Any liability or obligation of the Company to any Grantee with respect to an Incentive Award shall be based solely upon any contractual obligations that may be created by this Plan and any Incentive Agreement, and no such liability or obligation of the Company shall be deemed to be secured by any pledge or other encumbrance on any property of the Company. The Company, Board, and Committee shall not be required to give any security or bond for the performance of any obligation that may be created by the Plan.

7.3  Withholding Taxes

        (a)    Tax Withholding.    The Company shall have the power and the right to deduct or withhold, or require a Grantee to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy federal, state, and local taxes, domestic or foreign, required by law or regulation to be withheld with respect to any taxable event arising as a result of the Plan or an Incentive Award hereunder. Upon the lapse of restrictions on Restricted Stock, the Committee, in its discretion, may elect to satisfy the tax withholding requirement, in whole or in part, by having the Company withhold Shares having a Fair Market Value on the date the tax is to be determined equal to the minimum withholding taxes which could be imposed on the transaction as determined by the Committee.

        (b)    Share Withholding.    With respect to tax withholding required upon the exercise of Stock Options or SARs, upon the lapse of restrictions on Restricted Stock, or upon any other taxable event arising as a result of any Incentive Awards, Grantees may elect, subject to the approval of the Committee in its discretion, to satisfy the withholding requirement, in whole or in part, by having the Company withhold Shares having a Fair Market Value on the date the tax is to be determined equal to the minimum withholding taxes which could be imposed on the transaction as determined by the Committee. All such elections shall be made in writing, signed by the Grantee, and shall be subject to any restrictions or limitations that the Committee, in its discretion, deems appropriate.

        (c)    Incentive Stock Options.    With respect to Shares received by a Grantee pursuant to the exercise of an Incentive Stock Option, if such Grantee disposes of any such Shares within (i) two years from the date of grant of such Option or (ii) one year after the transfer of such shares to the Grantee, the Company shall have the right to withhold from any salary, wages or other compensation payable by the Company to the Grantee an amount sufficient to satisfy the minimum withholding taxes which could be imposed with respect to such disqualifying disposition.

7.4  No Guarantee of Tax Consequences

        The Company, Board and the Committee do not make any commitment or guarantee that any federal, state, local or foreign tax treatment will apply or be available to any person participating or eligible to participate hereunder.

I-25


Table of Contents

7.5  Designation of Beneficiary by Participant

        Each Grantee may, from time to time, name any beneficiary or beneficiaries (who may be named contingently or successively) to whom any benefit under the Plan is to be paid in case of his death before he receives any or all of such benefit. Each such designation shall revoke all prior designations by the same Grantee, shall be in a form prescribed by the Committee, and will be effective only when filed by the Grantee in writing with the Committee (or its delegate), and received and accepted during the Grantee's lifetime. In the absence of any such designation, benefits remaining unpaid at the Grantee's death shall be paid to the Grantee's estate.

7.6  Deferrals

        The Committee shall not permit a Grantee to defer such Grantee's receipt of the payment of cash or the delivery of Shares under the terms of his Incentive Agreement that would otherwise be due and payable by virtue of the lapse or waiver of restrictions with respect to Restricted Stock or another form of Incentive Award, or the satisfaction of any requirements or goals with respect to any Incentive Awards.

7.7  Amendment and Termination

        The Board shall have the power and authority to terminate or amend the Plan at any time; provided, however, the Board shall not, without the approval of the shareholders of the Company within the time period required by applicable law:

        (a)   except as provided in Section 6.6, increase the maximum number of Shares which may be issued under the Plan pursuant to Section 1.4;

        (b)   amend the requirements as to the class of Employees eligible to purchase Common Stock under the Plan;

        (c)   extend the term of the Plan; or,

        (d)   if the Company is a Publicly Held Corporation (i) increase the maximum limits on Incentive Awards to Covered Employees as set for compliance with the Performance-Based Exception or (ii) decrease the authority granted to the Committee under the Plan in contravention of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act to the extent Section 16 of the Exchange Act is applicable to the Company.

        No termination, amendment, or modification of the Plan shall adversely affect in any material way any outstanding Incentive Award previously granted to a Grantee under the Plan, without the written consent of such Grantee or other designated holder of such Incentive Award.

        In addition, to the extent that the Committee determines that (a) the listing for qualification requirements of any securities exchange or quotation system on which the Company's Common Stock is then listed or quoted, if applicable, or (b) the Code (or regulations promulgated thereunder), require shareholder approval in order to maintain compliance with such listing requirements or to maintain any favorable tax advantages or qualifications, then the Plan shall not be amended in such respect without approval of the Company's shareholders.

7.8  Requirements of Law

        (a)    Governmental Entities and Securities Exchanges.    The granting of Incentive Awards and the issuance of Shares under the Plan shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and to such approvals by any governmental agencies or securities exchanges as may be required. Certificates evidencing Shares delivered under the Plan (to the extent that such shares are so evidenced) may be subject to such stop transfer orders and other restrictions as the Committee may deem advisable under the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, any securities exchange or

I-26


Table of Contents

transaction reporting system upon which the Common Stock is then listed or to which it is admitted for quotation, and any applicable federal or state securities law or regulation. The Committee may cause a legend or legends to be placed upon such certificates (if any) to make appropriate reference to such restrictions.

        The Company shall not be required to sell or issue any Shares under any Incentive Award if the sale or issuance of such Shares would constitute a violation by the Grantee or any other individual exercising the Incentive Award, or the Company, of any provision of any law or regulation of any governmental authority, including without limitation, any federal or state securities law or regulation. If at any time the Company shall determine, in its discretion, that the listing, registration or qualification of any Shares subject to an Incentive Award upon any securities exchange or under any governmental regulatory body is necessary or desirable as a condition of, or in connection with, the issuance or purchase of Shares hereunder, no Shares may be issued or sold to the Grantee or any other individual pursuant to an Incentive Award unless such listing, registration, qualification, consent or approval shall have been effected or obtained free of any conditions not acceptable to the Company, and any delay caused thereby shall in no way affect the date of termination of the Incentive Award. The Company shall not be obligated to take any affirmative action in order to cause the exercise of an Incentive Award or the issuance of Shares pursuant to the Plan to comply with any law or regulation of any governmental authority. As to any jurisdiction that expressly imposes the requirement that an Incentive Award shall not be exercisable until the Shares covered thereby are registered or are exempt from registration, the exercise of such Incentive Award (under circumstances in which the laws of such jurisdiction apply) shall be deemed conditioned upon the effectiveness of such registration or the availability of such an exemption.

        (b)    Securities Act Rule 701.    If no class of the Company's securities is registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, then unless otherwise determined by the Committee, grants of Incentive Awards to "Rule 701 Grantees" (as defined below) and issuances of the underlying shares of Common Stock, if any, on the exercise or conversion of such Incentive Awards are intended to comply with all applicable conditions of Securities Act Rule 701 ("Rule 701"), including, without limitation, the restrictions as to the amount of securities that may be offered and sold in reliance on Rule 701, so as to qualify for an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. Any ambiguities or inconsistencies in the construction of an Incentive Award or the Plan shall be interpreted to give effect to such intention. In accordance with Rule 701, each Grantee shall receive a copy of the Plan on or before the date an Incentive Award is granted to him, as well as the additional disclosure required by Rule 701 (e) if the aggregate sales price or amount of securities sold during any consecutive 12-month period exceeds $5,000,000 as determined under Rule 701(e). If Rule 701 (or any successor provision) is amended to eliminate or otherwise modify any of the requirements specified in Rule 701, then the provisions of this Section 7.8(b) shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with Rule 701 as so amended. For purposes of this Section 7.8(b), as determined in accordance with Rule 701, "Rule 701 Grantees" shall mean any Grantee other than a director of the Company, the Company's chairman, CEO, president, chief financial officer, controller and any vice president of the Company, and any other key employee of the Company who generally has access to financial and other business related information and possesses sufficient sophistication to understand and evaluate such information.

7.9  Rule 16b-3 Securities Law Compliance for Insiders

        If the Company is a Publicly Held Corporation, transactions under the Plan with respect to Insiders are intended to comply with all applicable conditions of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act to the extent Section 16 of the Exchange Act is applicable to the Company. Any ambiguities or inconsistencies in the construction of an Incentive Award or the Plan shall be interpreted to give effect to such intention, and to the extent any provision of the Plan or action by the Committee fails to so

I-27


Table of Contents


comply, it shall be deemed null and void to the extent permitted by law and deemed advisable by the Committee in its discretion.

7.10  Compliance with Code Section 162(m) for Publicly Held Corporation

        If the Company is a Publicly Held Corporation, unless otherwise determined by the Committee with respect to any particular Incentive Award, it is intended that the Plan shall comply fully with the applicable requirements so that any Incentive Awards subject to Section 162(m) that are granted to Covered Employees shall qualify for the Performance-Based Exception. If any provision of the Plan or an Incentive Agreement would disqualify the Plan or would not otherwise permit the Plan or Incentive Award to comply with the Performance-Based Exception as so intended, such provision shall be construed or deemed to be amended to conform to the requirements of the Performance-Based Exception to the extent permitted by applicable law and deemed advisable by the Committee; provided, however, no such construction or amendment shall have an adverse effect on the prior grant of an Incentive Award or the economic value to a Grantee of any outstanding Incentive Award.

7.11  Compliance with Code Section 409A

        It is intended that Incentive Awards granted under the Plan shall be exempt from, or in compliance with, Code Section 409A, unless otherwise determined by the Committee at the time of grant. In that respect, the Company, by action of its Board, reserves the right to amend the Plan, and the Board and the Committee each reserve the right to amend any outstanding Incentive Agreement, to the extent deemed necessary or appropriate either to exempt such Incentive Award from Section 409A or to comply with the requirements of Section 409A. Further, Grantees who are "Specified Employees" (as defined under Section 409A), shall be required to delay payment of an Incentive Award for six (6) months after separation from service, but only to the extent such Incentive Award is governed by Section 409A and such delay is required thereunder.

7.12  Notices

        (a)    Notice From Insiders to Secretary of Change in Beneficial Ownership.    To the extent Section 16 of the Exchange Act is applicable to the Company, within two business days after the date of a change in beneficial ownership of the Common Stock issued or delivered pursuant to this Plan, an Insider should report to the Secretary of the Company any such change to the beneficial ownership of Common Stock that is required to be reported with respect to such Insider under Rule 16(a)-3 promulgated pursuant to the Exchange Act. Whenever reasonably feasible, Insiders will provide the Committee with advance notification of such change in beneficial ownership.

        (b)    Notice to Insiders and Securities and Exchange Commission.    To the extent applicable, the Company shall provide notice to any Insider, as well as to the Securities and Exchange Commission, of any "blackout period," as defined in Section 306(a)(4) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in any case in which Insider is subject to the requirements of Section 304 of said Act in connection with such "blackout period."

7.13  Pre-Clearance Agreement with Brokers

        Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, no Shares issued pursuant to the Plan will be delivered to a broker or dealer that receives such Shares for the account of an Insider unless and until the broker or dealer enters into a written agreement with the Company whereby such broker or dealer agrees to report immediately to the Secretary of the Company (or other designated person) a change in the beneficial ownership of such Shares.

I-28


Table of Contents

7.14  Successors to Company

        All obligations of the Company under the Plan with respect to Incentive Awards granted hereunder shall be binding on any successor to the Company, whether the existence of such successor is the result of a direct or indirect purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise, of all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company.

7.15  Miscellaneous Provisions

        (a)   No Employee, Consultant, Outside Director, or other person shall have any claim or right to be granted an Incentive Award under the Plan. Neither the Plan, nor any action taken hereunder, shall be construed as giving any Employee, Consultant, or Outside Director any right to be retained in the Employment or other service of the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary.

        (b)   The expenses of the Plan shall be borne by the Company.

        (c)   By accepting any Incentive Award, each Grantee and each person claiming by or through him shall be deemed to have indicated his acceptance of the Plan.

        (d)   The proceeds received from the sale of Common Stock pursuant to the Plan shall be used for general corporate purposes of the Company.

7.16  Severability

        In the event that any provision of this Plan shall be held illegal, invalid or unenforceable for any reason, such provision shall be fully severable, but shall not affect the remaining provisions of the Plan, and the Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the illegal, invalid, or unenforceable provision was not included herein.

7.17  Gender, Tense and Headings

        Whenever the context so requires, words of the masculine gender used herein shall include the feminine and neuter, and words used in the singular shall include the plural. Section headings as used herein are inserted solely for convenience and reference and constitute no part of the interpretation or construction of the Plan.

7.18  Governing Law

        The Plan shall be interpreted, construed and constructed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas without regard to its conflicts of law provisions, except as may be superseded by applicable laws of the United States.

        [Signature page follows.]

I-29


Table of Contents

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Plan to be duly executed in its name and on its behalf by its duly authorized officer, effective as of the Effective Date.

    RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ MARY LOU FRY

Mary Lou Fry
Vice President

I-30


Table of Contents

FIRST AMENDMENT TO
RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC.
2008 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

        This FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC. 2008 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (this "Amendment") is hereby made and entered into this 6th day of May, 2009 by the board of directors (the "Board") of Resaca Exploitation, Inc., a Texas corporation (the "Company"). Terms used in this Amendment with initial capital letters that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan").

RECITALS

        WHEREAS, Section 7.7 of the Plan provides that the Board may amend the Plan at any time without shareholder approval, unless such amendment (i) increases the maximum number of shares which may be issued under the Plan, (ii) amends the requirements as to the class of employees eligible to purchase Common Stock under the Plan; (iii) extends the term of the Plan; or (iv) increases the maximum limits on certain incentive awards or decreases the authority granted under the Plan in contravention of Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        WHEREAS, the Board deems it advisable and in the best interests of the Company to amend the Plan to permit the Board to authorize one or more officers of the Company to (i) designate officers and employees of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company to receive stock appreciation rights and options under the Plan and (ii) designate the number of shares subject to such awards of stock appreciation rights or options under the Plan.

        NOW, THEREFORE, this First Amendment ("Amendment") is hereby made with all the amendments set forth herein, as follows:

        1.     Section 1.3(e) is deleted, in its entirety, and replaced as follows:

        2.     As expressly amended hereby, the Agreement is ratified and confirmed in all respects and shall remain in full force and effect.

[Signature page follows.]

I-31


Table of Contents

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being a duly authorized officer of the Company has approved, ratified and executed this Amendment, effective as of May 6, 2009.


 

 

 

 

 
    RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ MARY LOU FRY

    Name:   Mary Lou Fry

    Title:   Vice President

I-32


Table of Contents


ANNEX J

SECOND AMENDMENT TO
RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC.
2008 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

        This SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC. 2008 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (this "Amendment") is hereby made and entered into this 1st day of April, 2010 by the board of directors (the "Board") of Resaca Exploitation, Inc., a Texas corporation (the "Company"). Terms used in this Amendment with initial capital letters that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan").


RECITALS

        WHEREAS, Cano Petroleum, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Cano"), and the Company entered into the Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Cano, the Company, and Resaca Acquisition Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the "Merger Sub"), dated September 29, 2009 (the "Merger Agreement"), under which Cano will merge with and into the Merger Sub (the "Merger") and Cano will be the surviving corporation and subsidiary of the Company, effective as of the Closing Date (as defined in the Merger Agreement);

        WHEREAS, in connection with the Merger, the Company has approved a one for five reverse stock split of any outstanding Shares of Common Stock (the "Reverse Split");

        WHEREAS, in connection with the Merger and following the Reverse Split, the Board deems it advisable and in the best interests of the Company to amend the Plan to: (i) increase the amount of Shares of Common Stock available to be granted under the Plan and (ii) prohibit the repricing of any SAR or Stock Option granted under the Plan;

        WHEREAS, Section 7.7 of the Plan provides that the Board may amend the Plan at any time without shareholder approval, unless such amendment (i) increases the maximum number of shares which may be issued under the Plan, (ii) amends the requirements as to the class of employees eligible to purchase Common Stock under the Plan; (iii) extends the term of the Plan; or (iv) increases the maximum limits on certain incentive awards or decreases the authority granted under the Plan in contravention of Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;

        WHEREAS, the Company is submitting this Amendment to the shareholders for approval at the Company's 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders; and

        WHEREAS, the effectiveness of the Amendment is subject to and contingent on the completion of the Merger.

        NOW, THEREFORE, this Second Amendment ("Amendment") is hereby made with all the amendments set forth herein, as follows:

        1.     The first sentence of Section 1.4 is deleted, in its entirety, and replaced as follows:

        2.     Section 1.4(c) of the Plan is deleted, in its entirety, and replaced as follows:

J-1


Table of Contents

        3.     The following new Section 2.6 is added to the Plan:

        4.     As expressly amended hereby, the Agreement is ratified and confirmed in all respects and shall remain in full force and effect.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being a duly authorized officer of the Company has approved, ratified and executed this Amendment, effective as of Effective Time (as defined in the Merger Agreement).

  RESACA EXPLOITATION, INC.

 

By:

 

/s/ MARY LOU FRY

         

  Name:   Mary Lou Fry
         

  Title:   Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
         

J-2


 

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date CANO PETROLEUM M18924-S53573 CANO PETROLEUM 801 CHERRY STREET, SUITE 3200 FORT WORTH, TX 76102 For Against Abstain 1. Adoption of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated September 29, 2009, by and among Cano Petroleum, Inc., Resaca Exploitation, Inc. and Resaca Acquisition Sub, Inc. (as amended, the “Merger Agreement”) and the merger contemplated thereby. 4. In accordance with their discretion, to consider and vote upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. Vote on Proposals VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposals: 2. Adoption of the amendment to the Certificate of Designations, Rights and Preferences of the Series D Convertible Preferred Stock of Cano Petroleum, Inc. dated August 31, 2006 (the "Cano Series D Amendment"). 3. Adjournment or postponement of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the Merger Agreement or the Cano Series D Amendment. The first two proposals listed above relating to the merger and the Cano Series D Amendment are conditioned upon each other and the approval of each such proposal is required for completion of the merger.

 


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Special Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement is available at www.proxyvote.com. M18925-S53573 Cano Petroleum, Inc. Burnett Plaza 801 Cherry Street, Suite 3200 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CANO PETROLEUM, INC. FOR THE SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints S. Jeffrey Johnson and Benjamin Daitch, or either of them, his true and lawful agents and proxies with full power of substitution in each, to represent and to vote, as designated on this proxy card, all of the shares of Cano Petroleum, Inc. which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Special Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 10:00 a.m. Fort Worth, Texas time, at the Fort Worth Club, 306 West 7th Street, Fort Worth, Texas 76102, on June 23, 2010 and at any adjournments or postponements thereof, on all matters coming before said meeting, and especially to vote on the items of business specified on the reverse side, as more fully described in the notice of the meeting dated June 2, 2010 and the proxy statement accompanying such notice. THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED (I) FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT, (II) FOR THE CANO SERIES D AMENDMENT, (III) FOR THE CANO MEETING ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL, AND (IV) IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXY OR PROXIES, ON ANY OTHER BUSINESS THAT PROPERLY COMES BEFORE THE MEETING. YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO SPECIFY YOUR CHOICES BY MARKING THE APPROPRIATE BOX BUT YOU NEED NOT MARK ANY BOXES IF YOU WISH TO VOTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOARD OF DIRCTORS’ RECOMMENDATIONS. (Continued, and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)