UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K/A
Amendment No. 1
CURRENT REPORT
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 30, 2004
CANO PETROLEUM, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
000-50386 |
|
98 0401645 |
(State
or other |
|
(Commission
File |
|
(IRS
Employer |
309 West 7th Street, Suite 1600, Fort Worth, TX 76102
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):
o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
Item 2.01 Acquisition or Disposition of Assets.
On June 30, 2004, Cano Petroleum, Inc. (the Registrant, we or us) completed the purchase of all of the outstanding stock of Ladder Companies, Inc., d/b/a Ladder Energy Company, a Delaware corporation (Ladder) and Tri-Flow, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation (Tri-Flow, and together with Ladder, the Ladder Companies). The Ladder Companies are engaged in oil and gas exploration and production and their assets include ownership of interests in 61 wells, including 51 that are located primarily in one field of approximately 4,500 acres in Grant County, Oklahoma. Current net production from these wells is approximately 110 barrels of oil equivalent (BOE) per day and, based upon our engineers most recent estimate, proven reserves are approximately 622,000 BOE. We expect to increase production on the existing wells through recompletions and remedial work with an anticipated eventual production of 200 BOE per day. There is also potential for drilling up to 16 additional wells and opportunities for deeper drilling.
The acquisition was effective as of May 1, 2004. The cost of the acquisition was approximately $2.2 million, net of operating income, and the source of the funds used to complete the purchase came from sales of our preferred equity.
Cano Energy Corporation (CEC), a company in which our President, S. Jeffrey Johnson, is a principal shareholder, entered into an agreement in October 2003 to purchase the oil and gas interests of the Ladder Companies. CEC made a non-revocable deposit of $300,000 to the Ladder Companies to secure its performance, and when the agreement terminated in December 2003, the deposit was forfeited to the Ladder Companies. The deposit was carried on the books of Ladder as a payable to CEC and immediately prior to the Closing, the deposit was returned to CEC pursuant to a pre-existing arrangement between Ladder and CEC.
Item 4.01 Changes in Registrants Certifying Accountant.
As a coincidence of the previously reported change of control of the Registrant, we have dismissed Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP as our certifying accounts and replaced them with Hein & Associates LLP. Both the dismissal of Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP and the selection of Hein & Associates LLP were authorized and approved by the Registrants Board of Directors, and were effective on July 13, 2004.
During the past two years or any subsequent interim period, (i) we have not received an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion from Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP, but the audit reports for the years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 contained an explanatory paragraph regarding the substantial doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going concern; (ii) their opinions were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, and (iii) there have been no disagreements with Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP, would have caused them to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in their report. In particular, there were no reportable events, as such term is defined in Item 304 (a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K, during the past two years or any subsequent interim period through July 13, 2004. Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP has provided us with a letter confirming the statements in this paragraph.
Hein & Associates LLP was engaged on or about May 24, 2004, to audit Davenport Field Unit, LLC in connection with the previously reported acquisition of that entity by the Registrant. Hein & Associates LLP was also engaged by the Registrant on or about May 19, 2004, to audit the Ladder Companies in connection with our acquisition of the stock of the Ladder Companies. During the past two years or any subsequent interim period, Hein & Associates LLP has not consulted with us on any of the matters referenced in Item 304 (a)(2)(i) or (ii) of Regulation S-K, and Hein & Associates LLP has provided us with a letter to this effect.
1
Item 8.01 Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure.
As previously reported, we have undertaken a financing with gross proceeds to us of up to $8,000,000 through the issuance of up to 8,000 shares of non-voting Series C Convertible Preferred Stock at a price of $1,000 per share. Each share of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible, at any time, by the holder into shares of the Registrants common stock at an effective price of $3.75 per share, subject to adjustments downwards in the event that:
(i) the Registrant issues any common stock or securities convertible into common stock at an effective price of less than $3.75 per share until the date which is two years from issuance of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, in which case the effective price shall be that lower price; and
(ii) the Registrant fails to meet the Performance Milestones as required by the Management Stock Pool Stock Agreement (or the terms thereof are amended with the effect of reducing or eliminating the Performance Milestones), in which case the effective price shall be the lesser of (i) $3.75 per share or (ii) the average trailing five day bid price of the Registrants common stock on the over-the-counter Bulletin Board, less a 25% discount.
The Registrant will also grant to the holders of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock demand registration rights.
As of August 23, 2004, we have received a total of $6,000,000 from sales of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock.
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
(a) Financial statements of businesses acquired:
Audited Financial Statements of the Ladder Companies.
(b) Pro forma financial information:
Pro-forma consolidated financial statements of the Registrant and the Ladder Companies.
(c) Exhibits:
2.1 |
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated June 30, 2004, by and between Petroleum, Inc., as Buyer, and Jerry D. Downey and Karen S. Downey, as Sellers (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 15, 2004). |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Management Stock Pool Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K/A, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 11, 2004). |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Certificate of Designation for Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 15, 2004). |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
Letter of Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP dated July 13, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 15, 2004). |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
Letter of Hein & Associates LLP dated July 14, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 15, 2004). |
2
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
Dated: August 26, 2004
|
CANO PETROLEUM, INC. |
||
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Michael Ricketts |
|
|
|
Michael Ricketts |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
3
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRMS REPORT
June 16, 2004
Ladder Energy Company and Tri-Flow, Inc.
Dallas, Texas
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheet of Ladder Energy Company and Tri-Flow, Inc. (the Companies) as of December 31, 2003, and the related combined statements of operations, retained earnings, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companies management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the combined financial position of Ladder Energy Company and Tri-Flow, Inc. as of December 31, 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, on January 1, 2003, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.
Hein & Associates LLP |
|
Hein & Associates LLP |
Dallas, Texas |
June 16, 2004 |
4
LADDER ENERGY COMPANY AND TRI-FLOW, INC.
COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
MARCH 31, |
|
DECEMBER 31, |
|
||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
558,406 |
|
$ |
571,360 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
125,913 |
|
90,916 |
|
||
Prepayments |
|
13,470 |
|
13,470 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
697,789 |
|
675,746 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, AT COST (oil and gas properties on successful efforts method): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Producing leasehold costs |
|
949,782 |
|
949,782 |
|
||
Lease and well equipment |
|
598,800 |
|
598,800 |
|
||
Office and automotive equipment |
|
77,856 |
|
111,505 |
|
||
|
|
1,626,438 |
|
1,660,087 |
|
||
Less accumulated depreciation and depletion |
|
(667,737 |
) |
(668,570 |
) |
||
Net property and equipment |
|
958,701 |
|
991,517 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,656,490 |
|
$ |
1,667,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable, trade |
|
$ |
59,220 |
|
$ |
106,340 |
|
Oil and gas sales payable |
|
18,840 |
|
15,296 |
|
||
Escrow funds payable |
|
300,000 |
|
300,000 |
|
||
Current portion of asset retirement obligations |
|
16,608 |
|
16,423 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
394,668 |
|
438,059 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS, net of current portion |
|
222,597 |
|
220,114 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
617,265 |
|
658,173 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 5 and 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock |
|
1,000 |
|
1,000 |
|
||
Paid-in capital |
|
612,201 |
|
612,201 |
|
||
Retained earnings |
|
426,024 |
|
395,889 |
|
||
Total shareholders equity |
|
1,039,225 |
|
1,009,090 |
|
||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
1,656,490 |
|
$ |
1,667,263 |
|
See accompanying notes to these financial statements.
5
LADDER ENERGY COMPANY AND TRI-FLOW, INC.
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, |
|
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
OPERATING REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Crude oil and natural gas sales |
|
$ |
210,637 |
|
$ |
251,727 |
|
$ |
1,000,796 |
|
$ |
560,278 |
|
Overhead income and other revenue |
|
49,432 |
|
54,758 |
|
219,544 |
|
266,058 |
|
||||
Total operating revenues |
|
260,069 |
|
306,485 |
|
1,220,340 |
|
826,336 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operations expense |
|
89,837 |
|
114,842 |
|
436,061 |
|
253,738 |
|
||||
Production taxes |
|
14,270 |
|
13,441 |
|
68,347 |
|
39,600 |
|
||||
Depreciation and depletion |
|
17,126 |
|
30,273 |
|
121,091 |
|
116,584 |
|
||||
Accretion of asset retirement obligations |
|
2,668 |
|
2,543 |
|
10,173 |
|
|
|
||||
General and administrative |
|
80,243 |
|
92,306 |
|
434,401 |
|
449,120 |
|
||||
Total expenses |
|
204,144 |
|
253,405 |
|
1,070,073 |
|
859,042 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) |
|
55,925 |
|
53,080 |
|
150,267 |
|
(32,706 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Gain on sale of assets |
|
4,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
6,124 |
|
||||
Loss on commodity derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,815 |
) |
||||
Other |
|
2,659 |
|
(53 |
) |
7,385 |
|
10,082 |
|
||||
Total other income (expense) |
|
6,969 |
|
(53 |
) |
7,385 |
|
(15,609 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE |
|
62,894 |
|
53,027 |
|
157,652 |
|
(48,315 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE |
|
|
|
(96,552 |
) |
(96,552 |
) |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
$ |
62,894 |
|
$ |
(43,525 |
) |
$ |
61,100 |
|
$ |
(48,315 |
) |
See accompanying notes to these financial statements.
6
LADDER ENERGY COMPANY AND TRI-FLOW, INC.
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF RETAINED EARNINGS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2004 AND YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND 2002
RETAINED EARNINGS, January 1, 2002 |
|
$ |
580,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions |
|
(27,630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
(48,315 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
RETAINED EARNINGS, December 31, 2002 |
|
504,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions |
|
(169,545 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
61,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RETAINED EARNINGS, December 31, 2003 |
|
395,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions (unaudited) |
|
(32,759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (unaudited) |
|
62,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RETAINED EARNINGS, March 31, 2004 (unaudited) |
|
$ |
426,024 |
|
See accompanying notes to these financial statements.
7
LADDER ENERGY COMPANY AND TRI-FLOW, INC.
COMBINED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, |
|
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
62,894 |
|
$ |
(43,525 |
) |
$ |
61,100 |
|
$ |
(48,315 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Depreciation and depletion |
|
17,126 |
|
30,273 |
|
121,091 |
|
116,584 |
|
||||
Gain on sale of assets |
|
(4,310 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(6,124 |
) |
||||
Accretion of asset retirement obligations |
|
2,668 |
|
2,543 |
|
10,173 |
|
|
|
||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
|
96,552 |
|
96,552 |
|
|
|
||||
Changes in operating and assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Accounts receivable |
|
(34,997 |
) |
(74,792 |
) |
(39,889 |
) |
7,322 |
|
||||
Prepayments |
|
|
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
||||
Accounts payable |
|
(47,120 |
) |
(24,385 |
) |
32,930 |
|
(41,895 |
) |
||||
Oil and gas sales payable |
|
3,544 |
|
4,428 |
|
(5,040 |
) |
(11,896 |
) |
||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
(195 |
) |
(8,906 |
) |
277,842 |
|
15,676 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Additions to property and equipment |
|
|
|
(25,000 |
) |
(52,250 |
) |
(33,000 |
) |
||||
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
30,950 |
|
||||
Receipt of escrow funds |
|
|
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
20,000 |
|
(25,000 |
) |
247,750 |
|
(2,050 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Repayment of shareholder notes |
|
|
|
|
|
(8,128 |
) |
(28,787 |
) |
||||
Distributions |
|
(32,759 |
) |
|
|
(169,545 |
) |
(27,630 |
) |
||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(32,759 |
) |
|
|
(177,673 |
) |
(56,417 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
(12,954 |
) |
(33,906 |
) |
347,919 |
|
(42,791 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
571,360 |
|
223,441 |
|
223,441 |
|
266,232 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
558,406 |
|
$ |
189,535 |
|
$ |
571,360 |
|
$ |
223,441 |
|
See accompanying notes to these financial statements.
8
LADDER ENERGY COMPANY AND TRI-FLOW, INC.
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(the period subsequent to December 31, 2003 is unaudited)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
Ladder Energy Company and Tri-Flow, Inc. (the Companies) are engaged in oil and gas exploration and production (primarily in Oklahoma). The financial statements of the Companies have been combined due to common ownership. Activities of other affiliated entities are not reflected in these financial statements.
Property and Equipment
The Companies oil and gas producing activities are accounted for using the successful efforts method of accounting in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 19, Financial Accounting and Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing Companies.
In accordance with SFAS No. 19, the costs incurred to acquire property (proved and unproved), all development costs and costs of drilling exploratory wells that find proved oil and gas reserves are capitalized. The costs of exploratory wells currently being drilled are capitalized pending determination as to whether such wells have found proved oil and gas reserves. Upon final determination, such costs are either charged to operations or capitalized as producing oil and gas properties.
Office and automotive equipment is stated at cost. Normal maintenance and repairs are charged to operating expenses as incurred. Material expenditures that increase the life of an asset are capitalized and depreciated over the estimated remaining useful life of the asset.
Depreciation and Depletion
Depreciation and depletion of producing oil and gas properties are computed using the unit-of-production method based on estimated proved developed reserves determined by the Companies petroleum engineers. Office and automotive equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated lives ranging from five to ten years.
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the undiscounted future anticipated cash flow expected to be generated by an asset is compared to the carrying value of that asset. If the undiscounted expected cash flow exceeds the carrying value of the asset, no adjustment is required. If the carrying value exceeds the undiscounted future cash flow, the carrying value is reduced to discounted expected future cash flow to reflect impairment. The impairment loss is recorded as an expense in the current period. The Companies recorded no impairment expenses during 2003 or 2002.
Asset Retirement Obligations
On January 1, 2003, the Companies adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations (Statement 143). Statement 143 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation (ARO) be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. The Companies will incur asset retirement costs upon plugging and abandonment of its oil and gas producing properties. As a result of adoption of Statement 143, the Companies recorded a current ARO of $8,616, a long-term ARO of $117,244 and capitalized $125,860 to the cost of oil and gas properties. The Companies also adjusted accumulated depletion as of January 1, 2003 to the amount that would have been recognized from the date of acquisition of the various
9
properties resulting from the additional capitalized amount. The net effect of this increase in accumulated depletion of $50,361 and the estimated accretion expense of $46,191 that would have been recognized from the date of acquisition of the various properties through January 1, 2003 appears in the statement of operations as a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of $96,552. The effect of adopting FAS 143 in 2003 was to decrease income before change in accounting principle by approximately $27,000 for the 2003 year.
Assuming the Company adopted Statement 143 on January 1, 2002, the current and non-current ARO would have amounted to approximately $165,000 at that date and net income would have been reduced by approximately $17,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002.
The following is an analysis of the asset retirement obligation for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and the year ended December 31, 2003:
Balance, January 1, 2003 |
|
$ |
172,051 |
|
Liabilities incurred |
|
54,313 |
|
|
Liabilities settled |
|
|
|
|
Accretion expense |
|
10,173 |
|
|
Revisions in estimated cash flows |
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2003 |
|
236,537 |
|
|
Accretion expense |
|
2,668 |
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
239,205 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Companies consider all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
The Companies place their cash with financial institutions deemed by management to be of high credit quality. The amount on deposit in any one institution may exceed federally insured limits. At December 31, 2003, the Companies had cash in banks in excess of federally insured limits amounting to $471,360.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable consists of uncollateralized accrued revenues due under normal trade terms, generally requiring payment within 60 days of production, and uncollateralized joint interest owner obligations due within 30 days of the invoice date. No interest is charged on past-due balances. Payments made on all accounts receivable are applied to the earliest unpaid items. Management reviews receivables periodically and reduces the carrying amount by a valuation allowance that reflects managements best estimate of the amount that may not be collectible. No such allowance was necessary at December 31, 2003 or 2002.
Federal Income Tax
The shareholders of the Companies have elected to be treated under Subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code. Therefore, there is no provision for federal income tax presented on the financial statements because the tax responsibility is at the shareholder level.
10
Revenue and Expense Recognition
The Companies policy is to recognize revenue and expense on the accrual method of accounting. Accordingly, revenue is recognized when the minerals are sold, and expense is recorded when incurred.
Derivative Activity
The Companies follow Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 (SFAS 133), Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Under SFAS 133, all derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the derivatives fair value are currently recognized in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. The Companies typically do not designate open derivatives transactions as hedges, and therefore, recognize changes in fair value and monthly settlements currently in earnings. Although the Companies do not currently hold any derivative instruments, the Companies had realized losses on derivative transactions of $31,815 during the year ended December 31, 2002.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements based upon accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The actual results could differ from the estimates. Significant assumptions are required in the estimates of oil and gas reserves, which as described above, can affect the amounts at which oil and gas properties are recorded. Actual results can differ from estimates, and such differences can be material.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The reported values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments.
Unaudited Information
The combined financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 included herein have been prepared without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and notes normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The financial statements reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods. Such adjustments are considered to be of a normal recurring nature unless otherwise identified. Results of operations for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that will be realized for the year ending December 31, 2004.
2. OIL AND GAS SALES PAYABLE
Oil and gas sales payable represent monies received by the Companies in the ordinary course of business on behalf of outside working interest owners and royalty interest owners on properties operated by the Companies. The funds are either disbursed to the owners in subsequent months or used to offset accounts receivable.
11
3. ESCROW FUNDS PAYABLE
Escrow funds payable represent a deposit received in connection with an agreement to sell substantially all of the Companies oil and gas producing assets. Such agreement terminated in December 2003, and at that time, the deposit was forfeited by the potential buyer. The Companies are currently negotiating in good faith with the potential buyer for the return of the deposit, and as such, have recorded the deposit as a current liability.
4. COMMON STOCK
The Companies common stock consisted of the following at December 31, 2003:
|
|
Par Value |
|
Paid-in |
|
||
Ladder Energy Company no par value, 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding |
|
$ |
500 |
|
$ |
606,033 |
|
Tri-Flow, Inc. $1.00 par value, 500 shares authorized, issued and outstanding |
|
500 |
|
6,168 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
$ |
612,201 |
|
5. LEASING ARRANGEMENTS
The Companies lease their office space from affiliates under informal, month-to-month operating lease arrangements. Rents paid to the affiliates amounted to $27,500 and $28,873 during the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
The Companies are involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the resolution of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Companies financial position or net income.
Environmental
The Companies are subject to various state, local, and federal environmental laws and regulations. The Companies strives to meet the various regulations and monitors changes by the governmental agencies. The Companies is not aware of any violations related to environmental issues.
7. SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)
All of the Companies operations are directly related to oil and gas producing activities in the state of Oklahoma.
Proved Reserves
Proved oil and gas reserves have been estimated by independent petroleum engineers. Proved reserves are the estimated quantities that geologic and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be
12
recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed reserves are the quantities expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Due to the inherent uncertainties and the limited nature of reservoir data, such estimates are subject to change as additional information becomes available. The reserves actually recovered and the timing of production of these reserves may be substantially different from the original estimate. Revisions result primarily from new information obtained from development drilling and production history and from changes in economic factors. The reserve information is as follows:
|
|
Oil (Bbls) |
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves at December 31, 2001 |
|
224,920 |
|
2,157,291 |
|
Revisions of previous estimates |
|
27,127 |
|
373,711 |
|
Production |
|
(15,379 |
) |
(160,592 |
) |
Reserves at December 31, 2002 |
|
236,668 |
|
2,370,410 |
|
Revisions of previous estimates |
|
12,976 |
|
157,427 |
|
Production |
|
(13,764 |
) |
(152,638 |
) |
Reserves at December 31, 2003 |
|
235,880 |
|
2,375,199 |
|
Standardized Measure
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows (standardized measure) and changes in such cash flows are prepared using assumptions required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Such assumptions include the use of year-end prices for oil and gas and year-end costs for estimated future development and production expenditures to produce year-end estimated proved reserves. Year-end prices are not adjusted for the effect of hedge derivatives. Discounted future net cash flows are calculated using a 10% rate.
As of December 31, 2003, estimated well abandonment costs, net of salvage, are deducted from the standardized measure using year-end costs. Such abandonment costs are recorded as a liability on the consolidated balance sheet using estimated values of the projected abandonment date and discounted using a risk-adjusted rate at the time the well is drilled or acquired.
The standardized measure does not represent managements estimate of the future cash flows or the value of proved oil and gas reserves. Probable and possible reserves, which may become proved in the future, are excluded from the calculations. Furthermore, year-end prices used to determine the standardized measure of discounted cash flows are influenced by seasonal demand and other factors and may not be the most representative in estimating future revenues or reserve data.
Price and cost revisions are primarily the net result of changes in year-end prices, based on beginning of year reserve estimates. Quantity estimate revisions are primarily the result of the extended economic life of proved reserves and proved undeveloped reserve additions attributable to increased development activity.
The average realized oil prices for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 were $29.58 and $23.85, respectively. The average realized gas prices for the same two periods were $4.56 and $2.88,
13
respectively. The standardized measure of discounted estimated future net cash flows related to proved oil reserves at December 31, 2003 and 2002 is as follows:
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Future cash inflows |
|
$ |
22,856,000 |
|
$ |
20,274,000 |
|
Future production and development costs |
|
9,601,000 |
|
8,872,000 |
|
||
Future net cash flows, before income tax |
|
13,255,000 |
|
11,402,000 |
|
||
Future income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Future net cash flows |
|
13,255,000 |
|
11,402,000 |
|
||
10% annual discount |
|
(5,553,000 |
) |
(4,922,000 |
) |
||
Standardized measure of discounted net cash flows |
|
$ |
7,702,000 |
|
$ |
6,480,000 |
|
The primary changes in the standardized measure of discounted estimated future net cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 were as follow:
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Beginning of year |
|
$ |
6,480,000 |
|
$ |
3,683,000 |
|
Sales of oil produced, net of production costs |
|
(498,000 |
) |
(453,000 |
) |
||
Effect of change in prices |
|
1,229,000 |
|
2,478,000 |
|
||
Net change due to quantity estimates |
|
498,000 |
|
961,000 |
|
||
Revisions of estimates and other |
|
(7,000 |
) |
(189,000 |
) |
||
End of year |
|
$ |
7,702,000 |
|
$ |
6,480,000 |
|
***************
14
CANO PETROLEUM, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The unaudited pro forma combined financial statements were prepared to present the effect of the following business combinations:
the merger of Huron Ventures, Inc. (Huron) and the Davenport Field Unit (Davenport) on May 28, 2004 and
the acquisition of the Ladder Companies, Inc. (Ladder) on June 30, 2004.
These business combinations were financed by the issuance of Series B and Series C preferred stock totaling $2 million and $6 million, respectively.
Effective with the merger, Huron changed its name to Cano Petroleum, Inc. (Cano). The amounts reported on Hurons 10-QSB/A filed for the first quarter of 2004 are presented in the unaudited pro forma combined financial statements under Cano Petroleum historical amounts.
The unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet of Cano as of March 31, 2004, gives effect to the business combinations as if they had occurred on March 31, 2004.
The unaudited pro forma combined statement of operations of Cano as of March 31, 2004, gives effect to the business combinations as if they had occurred on April 1, 2003. The unaudited pro forma combined financial statements of Cano have been included as required by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and are provided for comparative purposes only.
The unaudited pro forma combined financial statements of Cano are presented based on the historical consolidated statements of Cano (formerly Huron), Davenport, and Ladder, and should be read in conjunction with such financial statements and the related notes thereto. The unaudited pro forma combined financial statements of Cano are based upon assumptions and include adjustments as explained in the notes to the unaudited pro forma combined financial statements, and the actual recording of the transactions could differ. The unaudited pro forma combined financial statements of Cano are not necessarily indicative of the financial results that would have occurred had the merger been effective on and as of the dates indicated and should not be viewed as indicative of operations in the future.
15
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED
BALANCE SHEET
As of March 31, 2004
|
|
Cano |
|
Davenport |
|
Ladder |
|
Pro Forma |
|
Combined |
|
|||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,830 |
|
$ |
77 |
|
$ |
571,360 |
|
$ |
1,926,556 |
(b) |
$ |
5,073,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(805,284 |
)(c) |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(300,000 |
)(h) |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,926,556 |
(i) |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,248,542 |
)(j) |
|
|
|||||
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
90,916 |
|
|
|
90,916 |
|
|||||
Prepayments |
|
|
|
|
|
13,470 |
|
|
|
13,470 |
|
|||||
Receivable from Cano Energy Company |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|||||
Total current assets |
|
2,830 |
|
4,077 |
|
675,746 |
|
4,499,286 |
|
5,181,940 |
|
|||||
Oil and gas properties, successful efforts method, less accumulated depletion |
|
|
|
704,005 |
|
991,517 |
|
57,995 |
(a) |
2,992,969 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,239,452 |
(j) |
|
|
|||||
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,404 |
(a) |
121,404 |
|
|||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
2,830 |
|
$ |
708,082 |
|
$ |
1,667,263 |
|
$ |
5,918,137 |
|
$ |
8,296,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES AND (DEFICIENCY IN) SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
3,500 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
106,340 |
|
$ |
35,000 |
(b) (i) |
$ |
144,840 |
|
Oil and gas sales payable |
|
|
|
|
|
15,296 |
|
|
|
15,296 |
|
|||||
Escrow funds payable |
|
|
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
(300,000 |
)(h) |
|
|
|||||
Payable to Vaca Operating Company |
|
|
|
67,051 |
|
|
|
360,964 |
(a) |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(428,015 |
)(c) |
|
|
|||||
Advance from related party |
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
(70,000 |
)(d) |
|
|
|||||
Current portion of asset retirement obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
16,423 |
|
|
|
16,423 |
|
|||||
Notes payable - Bluebonnet Resources Corporation |
|
|
|
377,269 |
|
|
|
(377,269 |
)(c) |
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
|
73,500 |
|
444,320 |
|
438,059 |
|
(779,320 |
) |
176,559 |
|
|||||
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
|
82,197 |
|
220,114 |
|
|
|
302,311 |
|
|||||
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
(Deficiency in) shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Series A, no shares issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e) |
|
|
|||||
Series B; 8,000 shares authorized and 2,000 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,909,056 |
(b) |
1,909,056 |
|
|||||
Series C; 8,000 shares authorized and 6,000 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,909,056 |
(i) |
5,909,056 |
|
|||||
Common stock, par value $.0001 per share; 50,000,000 authorized; 15,647,204 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2004 |
|
698 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
1,000 |
(e) |
2,215 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
517 |
(a) |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000 |
)(j) |
|
|
|||||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
6,249,754 |
|
388,817 |
|
612,201 |
|
(388,817 |
(a) |
8,572,487 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,323,733 |
(a) |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000 |
)(e) |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(612,201 |
)(j) |
|
|
|||||
(Accumulated deficit) Retained Earnings |
|
(6,321,122 |
) |
(207,252 |
) |
395,889 |
|
207,252 |
(a) |
(6,251,122 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000 |
(d) |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(395,889 |
)(j) |
|
|
|||||
Deferred compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,324,250 |
)(a) |
(2,324,250 |
) |
|||||
Treasury stock at cost, 6,500,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|||||
Total (deficiency in) shareholders equity |
|
(70,670 |
) |
181,565 |
|
1,009,090 |
|
6,697,457 |
|
7,817,442 |
|
|||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
2,830 |
|
$ |
708,082 |
|
$ |
1,667,263 |
|
$ |
5,918,137 |
|
$ |
8,296,312 |
|
See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements.
16
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Twelve Months Ended March 31, 2004
|
|
Cano |
|
Davenport |
|
Ladder |
|
Pro Forma |
|
Combined |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Operating Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Crude Oil and Natural Gas Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
93,849 |
|
$ |
1,000,796 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,094,645 |
|
Overhead income and other revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
219,544 |
|
|
|
219,544 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
93,849 |
|
1,220,340 |
|
|
|
1,314,189 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Lease operating expenses |
|
|
|
184,010 |
|
504,408 |
|
|
|
688,418 |
|
|||||
Selling, general, and adminstrative |
|
88,009 |
|
|
|
434,401 |
|
1,162,125 |
(g) |
1,684,535 |
|
|||||
Accretion of asset retirement obligations |
|
|
|
7,821 |
|
10,173 |
|
|
|
17,994 |
|
|||||
Depletion and depreciation |
|
|
|
20,118 |
|
121,091 |
|
11,955 |
(f) (k) |
153,164 |
|
|||||
Total expenses |
|
88,009 |
|
211,949 |
|
1,070,073 |
|
1,174,080 |
|
2,544,111 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
(88,009 |
) |
(118,100 |
) |
150,267 |
|
(1,174,080 |
) |
(1,229,922 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Interest Charges and Other Income and Deductions |
|
|
|
(51,961 |
) |
7,385 |
|
|
|
(44,576 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Income (Loss) Before Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle |
|
(88,009 |
) |
(170,061 |
) |
157,652 |
|
(1,174,080 |
) |
(1,274,498 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle |
|
|
|
(7,555 |
) |
(96,552 |
) |
|
|
(104,107 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
(88,009 |
) |
$ |
(177,616 |
) |
$ |
61,100 |
|
$ |
(1,174,080 |
) |
$ |
(1,378,605 |
) |
See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements.
17
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(a) |
To record the merger of Huron and Davenport pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated May 26, 2004. Calculation of Purchase Price: |
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
Cano Petroleum common stock |
|
2,324,250 |
|
|
|
Asset Retirement Obligations |
|
82,197 |
|
|
|
Notes Payable to Bluebonnet Resources |
|
377,269 |
|
|
|
Assurance of Payment of Indebtedness |
|
427,015 |
|
|
|
Total Purchase Price |
|
$ |
3,211,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of Purchase Price: |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable |
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
Cash |
|
77 |
|
|
|
Oil & Gas Properties |
|
762,000 |
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
121,404 |
|
|
|
Deferred compensation |
|
2,324,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,211,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil & Gas Properties, net of accumulated depletion |
|
704,005 |
|
|
|
Increase in Oil & Gas Properties |
|
$ |
57,995 |
|
The purchase price calculation and allocation are subject to changes based on financial activity that occurred after March 31, 2004 and the fair market valuation of oil and gas properties. These amounts are expected to be finalized for the Companys year end reporting period, which is June 30, 2004. |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
To record cash received from the issuance of $2 million of Series B preferred stock, net of issuance costs of $70,444 and accrued registration fees of $17,500. |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
To record payments for amounts due to Bluebonnet Resources and Vaca Operating Company / Cano Energy Company as required by the Agreement and Plan to Merger dated May 26, 2004. |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) |
To record forgiveness of debt aggregating $70,000 and to recognize the return of 6,500,000 shares of Huron stock to treasury, pursuant to the Agreement and Plan to Merger dated May 26, 2004. |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e) |
To record the conversion of all Series A convertible preferred stock into 10,000,000 shares of Cano common stock. |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f) |
To record additional depletion expense of $2,690 on the additional costs allocated to producing properties as shown in note (a). The effective depletion rate for Cano Petroleum was 3.0% for the twelve months ended March 31, 2004. |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g) |
To record a full year amortization expense for deferred compensation of $1,162,125. |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h) |
To record the refund of a $300,000 deposit back to the Cano Energy Company immediately prior to the purchase of the Ladder Companies by Cano Petroleum. |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) |
To record cash received from the issuance of $6 million of Series C preferred stock, net of issuance costs of $70,444 and accrued registration fees of $17,500. |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(j) |
To record purchase of Ladder Companies by Cano Petroleum. Calculation of Purchase Price: |
|
Net acquisition price |
|
$ |
2,248,542 |
Asset Retirement Obligations |
|
|
236,537 |
Assurance of Payment of Indebtedness |
|
|
121,636 |
Total Purchase Price |
|
$ |
2,606,715 |
|
|
|
|
Allocation of Purchase Price: |
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable |
|
$ |
104,386 |
Cash |
|
|
271,360 |
Oil & Gas Properties |
|
|
2,230,969 |
|
|
$ |
2,606,715 |
|
|
|
|
Oil & Gas Properties, net of accumulated depletion |
|
|
991,517 |
Increase in Oil & Gas Properties |
|
$ |
1,239,452 |
18
The purchase price calculation and allocation are subject to changes based on financial activity that occurred after March 31, 2004 and the fair market valuation of oil and gas properties. These amounts are expected to be finalized for the Companys year end reporting period, which is June 30, 2004.
(k) To record additional depletion expense of $9,265 on the additional costs allocated to producing properties as shown in note (j). The effective depletion rate for Ladder was 5.8% for the twelve months ended March 31, 2004.
Pro Forma Supplementary Financial Information for Oil and Gas Producing Activities (Unaudited)
The following tables present certain unaudited pro forma information concerning Canos proved oil and gas reserves giving effect to the business combinations with Davenport and Ladder as if it had occurred on April 1, 2003. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating the quantities of proved reserves and projecting future rates of production and timing of development expenditures. The following reserve data represent estimates only and should not be construed as being exact. The proved oil reserve information for Davenport is as of March 31, 2004 and reflects prices and costs as of that date. The proved oil and gas reserve information for Ladder is as of December 31, 2003 and reflects prices and costs as of that date.
Reserves:
|
|
Davenport |
|
Ladder |
|
Ladder |
|
Cano Combined Pro Forma |
|
||
|
|
Oil (Barrels) |
|
Oil (Barrels) |
|
Gas (Mcf) |
|
Oil (Barrels) |
|
Gas (Mcf) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves at the beginning of twelve month period |
|
73,500 |
|
236,668 |
|
2,370,410 |
|
310,168 |
|
2,370,410 |
|
Revisions of prior estimates |
|
|
|
12,976 |
|
157,427 |
|
12,976 |
|
157,427 |
|
Production |
|
(2,200 |
) |
(13,764 |
) |
(152,638 |
) |
(15,964 |
) |
(152,638 |
) |
Reserves at the end of twelve month period |
|
71,300 |
|
235,880 |
|
2,375,199 |
|
307,180 |
|
2,375,199 |
|
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Cash Flows:
|
|
Davenport |
|
Ladder |
|
Cano |
|
|||
Future cash inflows |
|
$ |
2,283,000 |
|
$ |
22,856,000 |
|
$ |
25,139,000 |
|
Future production and development costs |
|
1,224,000 |
|
9,601,000 |
|
10,825,000 |
|
|||
Future net cash flows, before income taxes |
|
1,059,000 |
|
13,255,000 |
|
14,314,000 |
|
|||
Future income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Future net cash flows |
|
1,059,000 |
|
13,255,000 |
|
14,314,000 |
|
|||
10% annual discount |
|
(533,000 |
) |
(5,553,000 |
) |
(6,086,000 |
) |
|||
Standardized measure of discounted net cash flows |
|
$ |
526,000 |
|
$ |
7,702,000 |
|
$ |
8,228,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Changes in Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Cash Flows: |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Davenport |
|
Ladder |
|
Cano |
|
|||
Balance at beginning of the period |
|
$ |
466,000 |
|
$ |
6,480,000 |
|
$ |
6,946,000 |
|
Sales of oil produced, net of production costs |
|
(121,000 |
) |
(498,000 |
) |
(619,000 |
) |
|||
Effect of change in prices |
|
45,000 |
|
1,229,000 |
|
1,274,000 |
|
|||
Accretion of estimates and other |
|
46,000 |
|
498,000 |
|
544,000 |
|
|||
Revisions of estimates and other |
|
90,000 |
|
(7,000 |
) |
83,000 |
|
|||
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
526,000 |
|
$ |
7,702,000 |
|
$ |
8,228,000 |
|
***************
19