UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549-1004
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
OR
o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-14064
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
11-2408943 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
767 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York |
|
10153 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
212-572-4200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
At October 25, 2011, 116,596,817 shares of the registrants Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value, and 75,982,041 shares of the registrants Class B Common Stock, $.01 par value, were outstanding.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(In millions, except per share data) |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Sales |
|
$ |
2,476.7 |
|
$ |
2,091.7 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
534.3 |
|
488.1 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Gross Profit |
|
1,942.4 |
|
1,603.6 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Selling, general and administrative |
|
1,507.7 |
|
1,301.8 |
| ||
Restructuring and other charges |
|
4.7 |
|
3.8 |
| ||
Total operating expenses |
|
1,512.4 |
|
1,305.6 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Operating Income |
|
430.0 |
|
298.0 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest expense, net |
|
16.0 |
|
16.1 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Earnings before Income Taxes |
|
414.0 |
|
281.9 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Provision for income taxes |
|
135.4 |
|
92.3 |
| ||
Net Earnings |
|
278.6 |
|
189.6 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
1.5 |
| ||
Net Earnings Attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. |
|
$ |
278.6 |
|
$ |
191.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net earnings attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. per common share |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic |
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
$ |
.97 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
$ |
.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic |
|
195.3 |
|
196.7 |
| ||
Diluted |
|
199.6 |
|
200.4 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
|
|
September 30 |
|
June 30 |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
|
|
($ in millions) |
| ||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
719.5 |
|
$ |
1,253.0 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
1,378.5 |
|
945.6 |
| ||
Inventory and promotional merchandise, net |
|
982.2 |
|
995.6 |
| ||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
481.9 |
|
492.3 |
| ||
Total current assets |
|
3,562.1 |
|
3,686.5 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Property, Plant and Equipment, net |
|
1,125.1 |
|
1,143.1 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Goodwill |
|
876.7 |
|
877.3 |
| ||
Other intangible assets, net |
|
222.1 |
|
227.5 |
| ||
Other assets |
|
349.4 |
|
339.5 |
| ||
Total other assets |
|
1,448.2 |
|
1,444.3 |
| ||
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,135.4 |
|
$ |
6,273.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current debt |
|
$ |
141.8 |
|
$ |
138.0 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
424.2 |
|
446.7 |
| ||
Accrued income taxes |
|
163.9 |
|
62.3 |
| ||
Other accrued liabilities |
|
1,239.7 |
|
1,296.3 |
| ||
Total current liabilities |
|
1,969.6 |
|
1,943.3 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Noncurrent Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Long-term debt |
|
1,072.8 |
|
1,080.1 |
| ||
Accrued income taxes |
|
131.6 |
|
130.0 |
| ||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
469.4 |
|
473.5 |
| ||
Total noncurrent liabilities |
|
1,673.8 |
|
1,683.6 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Contingencies (Note 7) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Equity |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common stock, $.01 par value; 650,000,000 shares Class A authorized; shares issued: 196,850,606 at September 30, 2011 and 196,586,976 at June 30, 2011; 240,000,000 shares Class B authorized; shares issued and outstanding: 75,982,041 at September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011 |
|
2.7 |
|
2.7 |
| ||
Paid-in capital |
|
1,789.2 |
|
1,735.6 |
| ||
Retained earnings |
|
4,395.1 |
|
4,116.5 |
| ||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
(66.2 |
) |
17.7 |
| ||
|
|
6,120.8 |
|
5,872.5 |
| ||
Less: Treasury stock, at cost; 79,332,335 Class A shares at September 30, 2011 and 75,287,545 Class A shares at June 30, 2011 |
|
(3,645.5 |
) |
(3,243.1 |
) | ||
Total stockholders equity The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. |
|
2,475.3 |
|
2,629.4 |
| ||
Noncontrolling interests |
|
16.7 |
|
17.6 |
| ||
Total equity |
|
2,492.0 |
|
2,647.0 |
| ||
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
6,135.4 |
|
$ |
6,273.9 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net earnings |
|
$ |
278.6 |
|
$ |
189.6 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
69.6 |
|
68.8 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
(9.6 |
) |
6.1 |
| ||
Non-cash stock-based compensation |
|
45.4 |
|
30.6 |
| ||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
(11.0 |
) |
(0.9 |
) | ||
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment |
|
3.0 |
|
0.4 |
| ||
Non-cash charges associated with restructuring activities |
|
0.1 |
|
0.9 |
| ||
Pension and post-retirement benefit expense |
|
17.6 |
|
16.9 |
| ||
Pension and post-retirement benefit contributions |
|
(7.8 |
) |
(8.7 |
) | ||
Other non-cash items |
|
|
|
0.4 |
| ||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Increase in accounts receivable, net |
|
(482.1 |
) |
(369.2 |
) | ||
Increase in inventory and promotional merchandise, net |
|
(21.4 |
) |
(34.6 |
) | ||
Increase in other assets, net |
|
(9.1 |
) |
(12.9 |
) | ||
Decrease in accounts payable |
|
(10.6 |
) |
(63.8 |
) | ||
Increase in accrued income taxes |
|
113.0 |
|
71.5 |
| ||
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities |
|
(11.9 |
) |
65.8 |
| ||
Net cash flows used for operating activities |
|
(36.2 |
) |
(39.1 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Capital expenditures |
|
(80.8 |
) |
(57.7 |
) | ||
Acquisition of businesses and other intangible assets, net of cash acquired |
|
(7.7 |
) |
(258.5 |
) | ||
Net cash flows used for investing activities |
|
(88.5 |
) |
(316.2 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Borrowings of current debt, net |
|
1.2 |
|
7.1 |
| ||
Debt issuance costs |
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
| ||
Repayments and redemptions of long-term debt, net |
|
(2.4 |
) |
(9.5 |
) | ||
Net settlement of interest rate derivatives |
|
|
|
47.4 |
| ||
Net proceeds from stock-based compensation transactions |
|
3.6 |
|
14.6 |
| ||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
11.0 |
|
0.9 |
| ||
Payments to acquire treasury stock |
|
(402.9 |
) |
(143.8 |
) | ||
Dividends paid to stockholders |
|
(0.3 |
) |
(0.1 |
) | ||
Net cash flows used for financing activities |
|
(390.9 |
) |
(83.4 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
(17.9 |
) |
11.5 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
(533.5 |
) |
(427.2 |
) | ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
1,253.0 |
|
1,120.7 |
| ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
719.5 |
|
$ |
693.5 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of operations of any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the full fiscal year. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011.
Management Estimates
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses reported in those financial statements. Certain significant accounting policies that contain subjective management estimates and assumptions include those related to revenue recognition, inventory, pension and other post-retirement benefit costs, goodwill, other intangible assets and long-lived assets, income taxes and derivatives. Descriptions of these policies are discussed in the notes to consolidated financial statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment, and makes adjustments when facts and circumstances dictate. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from those estimates and assumptions. Significant changes, if any, in those estimates and assumptions resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the consolidated financial statements in future periods.
Currency Translation and Transactions
All assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries and affiliates are translated at period-end rates of exchange, while revenue and expenses are translated at weighted average rates of exchange for the period. Unrealized translation gains or losses are reported as cumulative translation adjustments through other comprehensive income (loss) (OCI). Such adjustments, attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc., amounted to $113.3 million of unrealized translation losses, net of tax, and $86.7 million of unrealized translation gains, net of tax, during the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. For the Companys Venezuelan subsidiary operating in a highly inflationary economy, the U.S. dollar is the functional currency. Remeasurement adjustments in financial statements in a highly inflationary economy and other transactional gains and losses are reflected in earnings.
The accompanying consolidated statements of earnings include net exchange gains (losses) on foreign currency transactions of $(9.8) million and $2.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable is stated net of the allowance for doubtful accounts and customer deductions totaling $33.9 million as of September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company is a worldwide manufacturer, marketer and distributor of skin care, makeup, fragrance and hair care products. The Companys sales are made primarily to department stores, perfumeries and specialty retailers. The Company grants credit to all qualified customers and does not believe it is exposed significantly to any undue concentration of credit risk.
The Companys largest customer sells products primarily within the United States and accounted for $313.3 million, or 13%, and $282.0 million, or 13%, of the Companys consolidated net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. This customer accounted for $202.6 million, or 15%, and $92.3 million, or 10%, of the Companys accounts receivable at September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively.
Inventory and Promotional Merchandise
|
|
September 30 |
|
June 30 |
| ||
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Inventory and promotional merchandise, net consists of: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Raw materials |
|
$ |
226.8 |
|
$ |
230.2 |
|
Work in process |
|
74.2 |
|
93.6 |
| ||
Finished goods |
|
494.4 |
|
475.4 |
| ||
Promotional merchandise |
|
186.8 |
|
196.4 |
| ||
|
|
$ |
982.2 |
|
$ |
995.6 |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
September 30 |
|
June 30 |
| ||
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Assets (Useful Life) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Land |
|
$ |
14.7 |
|
$ |
15.0 |
|
Buildings and improvements (10 to 40 years) |
|
189.9 |
|
195.5 |
| ||
Machinery and equipment (3 to 10 years) |
|
623.8 |
|
635.3 |
| ||
Computer hardware and software (4 to 10 years) |
|
715.9 |
|
707.1 |
| ||
Furniture and fixtures (5 to 10 years) |
|
98.1 |
|
93.9 |
| ||
Leasehold improvements |
|
1,197.7 |
|
1,215.3 |
| ||
|
|
2,840.1 |
|
2,862.1 |
| ||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
1,715.0 |
|
1,719.0 |
| ||
|
|
$ |
1,125.1 |
|
$ |
1,143.1 |
|
The cost of assets related to projects in progress of $208.8 million and $183.5 million as of September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively, is included in their respective asset categories above. Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment was $67.3 million and $65.4 million during the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Depreciation and amortization related to the Companys manufacturing process is included in cost of sales and all other depreciation and amortization is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Income Taxes
The effective rate for income taxes was 32.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
As of September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits, exclusive of interest and penalties, totaled $105.8 million and $104.8 million, respectively. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2011 that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate was $62.2 million. The total gross interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits during the three months ended September 30, 2011 in the accompanying consolidated statement of earnings was $3.1 million. The total gross accrued interest and penalties in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011 was $39.0 million and $37.7 million, respectively. On the basis of the information available as of September 30, 2011, it is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits could decrease in a range of $15 million to $25 million within 12 months as a result of projected resolutions of global tax examinations and controversies and a potential lapse of the applicable statutes of limitations.
During the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company was notified that an appeal for judicial review by the National Appellate Court of Spain of a disallowance of tax deductions claimed by its subsidiary in Spain for fiscal years 1999 through 2002 has been denied. The Company has been assessed corporate income tax and interest of $4.1 million, net of tax, at current exchange rates. On July 21, 2011, the Company filed an appeal with the Spain Supreme Court. While no assurance can be given as to the outcome in respect of this assessment and pending appeal in the Spanish courts, based on the decision of the National Appellate Court, management believes it is not more-likely-than-not that the subsidiary will be successful in its appeal to the Spain Supreme Court. Accordingly, the Company established a reserve which resulted in an increase to the provision for income taxes equal to the $4.1 million exposure, net of tax. Separately, during the fiscal 2012 first quarter the Companys subsidiary in Spain made a cash payment of $3.7 million, at current exchange rates, to the Spain tax authority as an advance deposit to limit the additional interest that would be due to the Spain tax authority should it receive an unfavorable decision from the Spain Supreme Court.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) amended its authoritative guidance related to Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more-likely-than-not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more-likely-than-not that a goodwill impairment exists, consideration should be made as to whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. This guidance became effective for the Companys fiscal 2012 first quarter. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB amended its authoritative guidance related to business combinations entered into by an entity that are material on an individual or aggregate basis. These amendments clarify existing guidance that if an entity presents comparative financial statements that include a material business combination, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period. The amendments also expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. This guidance became effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date was on or after the first day of the Companys fiscal 2012. This disclosure-only guidance did not have an impact on the Companys results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
In January 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that will require entities to make new disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair-value measurements of assets and liabilities. The Company adopted the new guidance in its fiscal 2010 third quarter, except for certain detailed recurring Level 3 disclosures, which became effective for the Companys fiscal 2012 first quarter. The Company currently does not have any recurring Level 3 assets or liabilities.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In September 2011, the FASB amended its authoritative guidance related to testing goodwill for impairment. Under the revised guidance, entities testing goodwill for impairment have the option of performing a qualitative assessment before performing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. If entities determine, on the basis of qualitative factors, that the fair value of the reporting unit is more-likely-than-not less than the carrying amount, the two-step impairment test would be required. This guidance becomes effective in the beginning of the Companys fiscal 2013, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the timing of adopting this guidance which will not have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In September 2011, the FASB amended its authoritative guidance related to multiemployer benefit plans. This revised disclosure-only guidance is intended to provide enhanced qualitative and quantitative disclosures about an employers significant financial obligations to a multiemployer pension plan and, therefore, help financial statement users better understand the financial health of all significant plans in which the employer participates. To the extent the information required under the revised standard is not available in the public domain, as may be the case for some foreign plans, employers should include more qualitative information about the plan. This disclosure-only guidance becomes effective for the Companys fiscal year ending June 30, 2013, with early adoption permitted and full retrospective application required. The Company is currently evaluating the timing of adopting and the impact of this guidance on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB amended its authoritative guidance related to the presentation of comprehensive income, requiring entities to present items of net income and other comprehensive income either in one continuous statement or in two separate consecutive statements. This guidance becomes effective for the Companys fiscal 2013 first quarter. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance but believes that it will result only in changes in the presentation of its consolidated financial statements and will not have a material impact on the Companys results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
In May 2011, the FASB amended its authoritative guidance related to fair value measurements to provide a consistent definition and measurement of fair value, as well as similar disclosure requirements between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. This guidance clarifies the application of existing fair value measurement and expands the existing disclosure requirements. This guidance becomes effective for the Companys fiscal 2012 third quarter. This guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys results of operations, financial position or cash flows, but may require certain additional disclosures.
NOTE 2 GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The Company assigns goodwill of a reporting unit to the product category in which that reporting unit predominantly operates at the time of its acquisition. The following table presents goodwill by product category and the related change in the carrying amount:
(In millions) |
|
Skin Care |
|
Makeup |
|
Fragrance |
|
Hair Care |
|
Total |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Balance as of June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Goodwill |
|
$ |
70.4 |
|
$ |
412.6 |
|
$ |
55.0 |
|
$ |
406.9 |
|
$ |
944.9 |
|
Accumulated impairments |
|
(24.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(43.2 |
) |
(67.6 |
) | |||||
|
|
46.0 |
|
412.6 |
|
55.0 |
|
363.7 |
|
877.3 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Goodwill acquired during the period |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
| |||||
Translation and other adjustments |
|
(0.7 |
) |
(0.2 |
) |
(0.1 |
) |
(1.8 |
) |
(2.8 |
) | |||||
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
2.0 |
|
(0.1 |
) |
(1.8 |
) |
(0.6 |
) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Balance as of September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Goodwill |
|
69.7 |
|
414.6 |
|
54.9 |
|
405.1 |
|
944.3 |
| |||||
Accumulated impairments |
|
(24.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(43.2 |
) |
(67.6 |
) | |||||
|
|
$ |
45.3 |
|
$ |
414.6 |
|
$ |
54.9 |
|
$ |
361.9 |
|
$ |
876.7 |
|
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Other intangible assets consist of the following:
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
June 30, 2011 |
| ||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Total Net |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Total Net |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Amortizable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Customer lists and other |
|
$ |
267.6 |
|
$ |
170.0 |
|
$ |
97.6 |
|
$ |
270.9 |
|
$ |
168.5 |
|
$ |
102.4 |
|
License agreements |
|
43.0 |
|
43.0 |
|
|
|
43.0 |
|
43.0 |
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
$ |
310.6 |
|
$ |
213.0 |
|
97.6 |
|
$ |
313.9 |
|
$ |
211.5 |
|
102.4 |
| ||
Non-amortizable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Trademarks and other |
|
|
|
|
|
124.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
125.1 |
| ||||||
Total intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
222.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
227.5 |
|
The aggregate amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $3.5 million and $3.6 million, respectively. The estimated aggregate amortization expense for the remainder of fiscal 2012 and for each of fiscal 2013 to 2016 is $10.1 million, $13.6 million, $13.5 million, $13.5 million and $13.3 million, respectively.
NOTE 3 RETURNS AND CHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH RESTRUCTURING ACTIVITIES
In an effort to drive down costs and achieve synergies within the organization, in February 2009, the Company announced the implementation of a multi-faceted cost savings program (the Program) to position itself to achieve long-term profitable growth. The Company anticipates the Program will result in related restructuring and other charges, inclusive of cumulative charges recorded to date and through the remainder of the Program, totaling between $350 million and $450 million before taxes. While the Company will continue to seek cost savings opportunities, the Companys current plans are to identify and approve specific initiatives under the Program through fiscal 2012 and execute those initiatives through fiscal 2013. The total amount of charges (pre-tax) associated with the Program, recorded, plus other initiatives approved through September 30, 2011, is approximately $305 million to $310 million, of which approximately $200 million to $202 million relates to restructuring charges, approximately $50 million of other costs to implement the initiatives, approximately $39 million to $42 million in sales returns and approximately $16 million in inventory write-offs. The restructuring charges are comprised of approximately $153 million to $155 million of employee-related costs, approximately $27 million of other exit costs and contract terminations (substantially all of which have resulted in or will result in cash expenditures), and approximately $20 million in non-cash asset write-offs. The total amount of cumulative charges (pre-tax) associated with the Program recorded from inception through September 30, 2011 was $243.5 million.
The Program focuses on a redesign of the Companys organizational structure in order to integrate it in a more cohesive way and operate more globally across brands and functions. The principal aspect of the Program was the reduction of the workforce by approximately 2,000 employees. Specific actions taken since the inception of the Program included:
· Resize and Reorganize the Organization The Company continued the realignment and optimization of its organization to better leverage scale, improve productivity, reduce complexity and achieve cost savings in each region and across various functions. This included reduction of the workforce which occurred through the consolidation of certain functions, which the Company achieved through a combination of normal attrition and job eliminations, and the closure and consolidation of certain distribution and office facilities.
· Turnaround or Exit Unprofitable Operations To improve the profitability in certain of the Companys brands and regions, the Company has selectively exited certain channels of distribution, categories and markets, and has made changes to turnaround others. This included the exit from the global wholesale distribution of the Companys Prescriptives brand and the reformulation of Ojon brand products. In connection with these activities, the Company incurred charges related to product returns, inventory write-offs, reduction of workforce and termination of contracts.
· Outsourcing In order to balance the growing need for information technology support with the Companys efforts to provide the most efficient and cost effective solutions, the Company continued the outsourcing of certain information technology processes. The Company incurred costs to transition services to outsource providers and employee-related termination costs.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Restructuring Charges
The following table presents restructuring charges related to the Program as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
| ||||
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Employee-related costs |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
Asset write-offs |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
| ||
Contract terminations |
|
0.1 |
|
0.3 |
| ||
Other exit costs |
|
0.6 |
|
0.6 |
| ||
Total restructuring charges |
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
The following table presents aggregate restructuring charges related to the Program:
(In millions) |
|
Employee- |
|
Asset |
|
Contract |
|
Other Exit |
|
Total |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Fiscal 2009 |
|
$ |
60.9 |
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
$ |
70.3 |
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
29.3 |
|
11.0 |
|
2.3 |
|
6.2 |
|
48.8 |
| |||||
Fiscal 2011 |
|
34.6 |
|
2.4 |
|
3.0 |
|
1.1 |
|
41.1 |
| |||||
Three months ended September 30, 2011 |
|
2.2 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.6 |
|
3.0 |
| |||||
Charges recorded through September 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
127.0 |
|
$ |
17.7 |
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
$ |
9.7 |
|
$ |
163.2 |
|
The following table presents accrued restructuring charges and the related activity as of and for the three months ended September 30, 2011 under the Program:
(In millions) |
|
Employee- Related |
|
Asset |
|
Contract |
|
Other Exit |
|
Total |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Charges |
|
$ |
60.9 |
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
$ |
70.3 |
|
Cash payments |
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
(1.6 |
) |
(9.6 |
) | |||||
Non-cash write-offs |
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) | |||||
Translation adjustments |
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
| |||||
Other adjustments |
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) | |||||
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
51.6 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
0.2 |
|
54.7 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Charges |
|
29.3 |
|
11.0 |
|
2.3 |
|
6.2 |
|
48.8 |
| |||||
Cash payments |
|
(49.5 |
) |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
(6.0 |
) |
(60.6 |
) | |||||
Non-cash write-offs |
|
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(11.0 |
) | |||||
Translation adjustments |
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) | |||||
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
0.4 |
|
31.1 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Charges |
|
34.6 |
|
2.4 |
|
3.0 |
|
1.1 |
|
41.1 |
| |||||
Cash payments |
|
(30.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
(1.4 |
) |
(34.4 |
) | |||||
Non-cash write-offs |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) | |||||
Translation adjustments |
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
0.1 |
|
1.2 |
| |||||
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
0.2 |
|
36.6 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Charges |
|
2.2 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.6 |
|
3.0 |
| |||||
Cash payments |
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
(0.3 |
) |
(7.4 |
) | |||||
Non-cash write-offs |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) | |||||
Translation adjustments |
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) | |||||
Balance at September 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
30.4 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
$ |
31.4 |
|
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Accrued restructuring charges at September 30, 2011 are expected to result in cash expenditures funded from cash provided by operations of approximately $22 million, $7 million and $2 million in fiscal 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively.
Total Returns and Charges Associated with Restructuring Activities
The following table presents total charges associated with restructuring activities related to the Program:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
| ||||
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Sales returns (included in Net sales) |
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
$ |
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
0.1 |
|
0.8 |
| ||
Restructuring charges |
|
3.0 |
|
1.7 |
| ||
Other charges |
|
1.7 |
|
2.1 |
| ||
Total returns and charges associated with restructuring activities |
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
During the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company recorded adjustments to reflect revised estimates of anticipated sales returns associated with prior initiatives. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the cost of sales adjustment primarily related to inventory write-offs associated with turnaround operations of $0.8 million. Other charges in connection with the implementation of the Program primarily relate to consulting and other professional services.
NOTE 4 DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company addresses certain financial exposures through a controlled program of risk management that includes the use of derivative financial instruments. The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts and may enter into option contracts to reduce the effects of fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates and interest rate derivatives to manage the effects of interest rate movements on the Companys aggregate liability portfolio. The Company also enters into foreign currency forward contracts and may use option contracts, not designated as hedging instruments, to mitigate the change in fair value of specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. The Company does not utilize derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Costs associated with entering into these derivative financial instruments have not been material to the Companys consolidated financial results.
For each derivative contract entered into where the Company looks to obtain hedge accounting treatment, the Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction, the nature of the risk being hedged, how the hedging instruments effectiveness in offsetting the hedged risk will be assessed prospectively and retrospectively, and a description of the method of measuring ineffectiveness. This process includes linking all derivatives to specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or to specific firm commitments or forecasted transactions. The Company also formally assesses, both at the hedges inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items. If it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective, or that it has ceased to be a highly effective hedge, the Company will be required to discontinue hedge accounting with respect to that derivative prospectively.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The fair values of the Companys derivative financial instruments included in the consolidated balance sheets are presented as follows:
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Fair Value (1) |
|
|
|
Fair Value (1) |
| ||||||||
(In millions) |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
September 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
September 30 |
|
June 30 |
| ||||
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
21.4 |
|
$ |
11.9 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
$ |
28.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
3.8 |
|
3.1 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
7.8 |
|
2.5 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total Derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
25.2 |
|
$ |
15.0 |
|
|
|
$ |
13.3 |
|
$ |
30.9 |
|
(1) See Note 5 Fair Value Measurements for further information about how the fair value of derivative assets and liabilities are determined.
The amounts of the gains and losses related to the Companys derivative financial instruments designated as hedging instruments are presented as follows:
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
Location of Gain or |
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
| ||||||||
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
from Accumulated |
|
Three Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30 |
|
OCI into Earnings |
|
September 30 |
| ||||||||
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
33.3 |
|
$ |
(13.9 |
) |
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
| ||||
Total derivatives |
|
$ |
33.3 |
|
$ |
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(1.5 |
) |
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
(2) The amount of gain (loss) recognized in earnings related to the amount excluded from effectiveness testing was $(2.4) million and $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. There was a de minimis gain recognized in earnings related to the ineffective portion of the hedging relationships for the three months ended September 30, 2011. There was no gain (loss) recognized in earnings related to the ineffective portion of the hedging relationships for the three months ended September 30, 2010.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
| ||||
|
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) |
|
Three Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
Recognized in Earnings on |
|
September 30 |
| ||||
(In millions) |
|
Derivatives |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Derivatives in Fair Value Hedging Relationships: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
(3) Changes in the fair values of the interest rate swap agreements are exactly offset by changes in the fair value of the underlying long-term debt.
The amounts of the gains and losses related to the Companys derivative financial instruments not designated as hedging instruments are presented as follows:
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
| ||||
|
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) |
|
Three Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
Recognized in Earnings on |
|
September 30 |
| ||||
(In millions) |
|
Derivatives |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
(4.5 |
) |
$ |
0.4 |
|
Foreign Currency Cash-Flow Hedges
The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge anticipated transactions, as well as receivables and payables denominated in foreign currencies, for periods consistent with the Companys identified exposures. The purpose of the hedging activities is to minimize the effect of foreign exchange rate movements on costs and on the cash flows that the Company receives from foreign subsidiaries. The majority of foreign currency forward contracts are denominated in currencies of major industrial countries. The foreign currency forward contracts entered into to hedge anticipated transactions have been designated as foreign currency cash-flow hedges and have varying maturities through the end of June 2013. Hedge effectiveness of foreign currency forward contracts is based on a hypothetical derivative methodology and excludes the portion of fair value attributable to the spot-forward difference which is recorded in current-period earnings.
The ineffective portion of foreign currency forward contracts is recorded in current-period earnings. For hedge contracts that are no longer deemed highly effective, hedge accounting is discontinued and gains and losses accumulated in OCI are reclassified to earnings when the underlying forecasted transaction occurs. If it is probable that the forecasted transaction will no longer occur, then any gains or losses in accumulated OCI are reclassified to current-period earnings. As of September 30, 2011, the Companys foreign currency cash-flow hedges were highly effective in all material respects. The estimated net loss as of September 30, 2011 that is expected to be reclassified from accumulated OCI into earnings, net of tax, within the next twelve months is $11.0 million. The accumulated gain (loss) on derivative instruments in accumulated OCI was $21.6 million and $(13.2) million as of September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively.
At September 30, 2011, the Company had foreign currency forward contracts in the amount of $1,580.1 million. The foreign currencies included in foreign currency forward contracts (notional value stated in U.S. dollars) are principally the British pound ($311.0 million), Swiss franc ($264.9 million), Euro ($241.2 million), Canadian dollar ($191.5 million), Australian dollar ($109.3 million), Japanese yen ($75.6 million) and South Korean won ($71.7 million).
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Credit Risk
As a matter of policy, the Company only enters into derivative contracts with counterparties that have a long-term credit rating of at least A- or higher by at least two nationally recognized rating agencies. The counterparties to these contracts are major financial institutions. Exposure to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by any of the counterparties is limited to the gross fair value of contracts in asset positions, which totaled $25.2 million at September 30, 2011. To manage this risk, the Company has established strict counterparty credit guidelines that are continually monitored and reported to management. Accordingly, management believes risk of loss under these hedging contracts is remote.
Certain of the Companys derivative financial instruments contain credit-risk-related contingent features. At September 30, 2011, the Company was in a net asset position for certain derivative contracts that contain such features with two counterparties. The fair value of those contracts as of September 30, 2011 was approximately $0.5 million. As of September 30, 2011, the Company was in compliance with such credit-risk-related contingent features.
NOTE 5 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company records its financial assets and liabilities at fair value, which is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability, in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The accounting for fair value measurements must be applied to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, which principally consist of assets and liabilities acquired through business combinations, goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets and long-lived assets for the purposes of calculating potential impairment, and liabilities associated with restructuring activities. The Company is required to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:
Level 1: |
Inputs based on quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date. |
|
|
Level 2: |
Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. |
|
|
Level 3: |
Inputs reflect managements best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. The inputs are unobservable in the market and significant to the instruments valuation. |
The following table presents the Companys hierarchy for its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2011:
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
25.2 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
25.2 |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.9 |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
$ |
25.2 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
31.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
13.3 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
13.3 |
|
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table presents the Companys hierarchy for its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011:
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
15.0 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
15.0 |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.6 |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
$ |
15.0 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
21.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
30.9 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
30.9 |
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of the Companys other classes of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:
Cash and cash equivalents The carrying amount approximates fair value, primarily because of the short maturity of cash equivalent instruments.
Available-for-sale securities Available-for-sale securities are generally comprised of mutual funds and are valued using quoted market prices on an active exchange. Available-for-sale securities are included in Other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Foreign currency forward contracts The fair values of the Companys foreign currency forward contracts were determined using an industry-standard valuation model, which is based on an income approach. The significant observable inputs to the model, such as swap yield curves and currency spot and forward rates, were obtained from an independent pricing service. To determine the fair value of contracts under the model, the difference between the contract price and the current forward rate was discounted using LIBOR for contracts with maturities up to 12 months, and swap yield curves for contracts with maturities greater than 12 months.
Current and long-term debt The fair value of the Companys debt was estimated based on the current rates offered to the Company for debt with the same remaining maturities. To a lesser extent, debt also includes capital lease obligations for which the carrying amount approximates the fair value.
The estimated fair values of the Companys financial instruments are as follows:
|
|
September 30 |
|
June 30 |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2011 |
| ||||||||
(In millions) |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Nonderivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
719.5 |
|
$ |
719.5 |
|
$ |
1,253.0 |
|
$ |
1,253.0 |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
5.9 |
|
5.9 |
|
6.6 |
|
6.6 |
| ||||
Current and long-term debt |
|
1,214.6 |
|
1,379.9 |
|
1,218.1 |
|
1,293.5 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts asset (liability) |
|
11.9 |
|
11.9 |
|
(15.9 |
) |
(15.9 |
) | ||||
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 6 PENSION AND POST-RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The Company maintains pension plans covering substantially all of its full-time employees for its U.S. operations and a majority of its international operations. The Company also maintains post-retirement benefit plans which provide certain medical and dental benefits to eligible employees. Descriptions of these plans are discussed in the notes to consolidated financial statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011.
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other than |
| ||||||||
|
|
Pension Plans |
|
Pension Plans |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
U.S. |
|
International |
|
Post-retirement |
| ||||||||||||
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
$ |
5.1 |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
Interest cost |
|
7.4 |
|
7.0 |
|
4.9 |
|
4.7 |
|
2.1 |
|
1.9 |
| ||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
|
(9.7 |
) |
(8.7 |
) |
(5.4 |
) |
(5.3 |
) |
(0.3 |
) |
(0.1 |
) | ||||||
Amortization of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Prior service cost |
|
0.2 |
|
0.2 |
|
1.0 |
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Actuarial loss |
|
2.0 |
|
2.4 |
|
1.2 |
|
1.4 |
|
0.5 |
|
0.5 |
| ||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
$ |
7.3 |
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
During the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company made contributions to its international pension plans totaling approximately $4 million.
NOTE 7 CONTINGENCIES
Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved, from time to time, in litigation and other legal proceedings incidental to its business. Management believes that the outcome of current litigation and legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon the Companys results of operations or financial condition. However, managements assessment of the Companys current litigation and other legal proceedings could change in light of the discovery of facts with respect to legal actions or other proceedings pending against the Company, not presently known to the Company or determinations by judges, juries or other finders of fact which are not in accord with managements evaluation of the possible liability or outcome of such litigation or proceedings. Reasonably possible losses in addition to the amount accrued for litigation and other legal proceedings are not material to the Companys consolidated financial statements.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 8 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company has various stock-based compensation programs under which awards, including stock options, performance share units (PSU), restricted stock units (RSU), share units and a market share unit (MSU), may be granted. As of September 30, 2011, approximately 11,634,800 shares of the Companys Class A Common Stock were reserved and available to be granted pursuant to these plans.
Total net stock-based compensation expense is attributable to the granting of, and the remaining requisite service periods of stock options, PSUs, RSUs, MSU and share units. Compensation expense attributable to net stock-based compensation is as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
| ||||
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Compensation expense |
|
$ |
45.4 |
|
$ |
30.6 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
14.9 |
|
10.1 |
| ||
As of September 30, 2011, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock-based awards was $151.7 million and the related weighted-average period over which it is expected to be recognized is approximately 2 years.
Stock Options
The following is a summary of the Companys stock option programs as of September 30, 2011 and changes during the three months then ended:
(Shares in thousands) |
|
Shares |
|
Weighted |
|
Aggregate |
|
Weighted |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Outstanding at June 30, 2011 |
|
8,486.2 |
|
$ |
45.73 |
|
|
|
|
| |
Granted at fair value |
|
1,647.7 |
|
98.17 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Exercised |
|
(91.7 |
) |
39.67 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Expired |
|
(0.9 |
) |
42.68 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Forfeited |
|
(19.9 |
) |
54.71 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Outstanding at September 30, 2011 |
|
10,021.4 |
|
54.39 |
|
$ |
352.3 |
|
7.2 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2011 |
|
9,880.9 |
|
54.07 |
|
$ |
350.0 |
|
7.1 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Exercisable at September 30, 2011 |
|
4,092.2 |
|
41.19 |
|
$ |
190.9 |
|
5.0 |
| |
(1) The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option.
The following is a summary of the per-share weighted average grant date fair value of stock options granted and total intrinsic value of stock options exercised:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
| ||||
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Per-share weighted average grant date fair value of stock options granted |
|
$ |
34.68 |
|
$ |
18.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Intrinsic value of stock options exercised |
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
$ |
7.7 |
|
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average expected stock-price volatility |
|
35 |
% |
31 |
% |
Weighted-average expected option life |
|
8 years |
|
8 years |
|
Average risk-free interest rate |
|
1.7 |
% |
2.2 |
% |
Average dividend yield |
|
1.0 |
% |
1.1 |
% |
The Company uses a weighted-average expected stock-price volatility assumption that is a combination of both current and historical implied volatilities of the underlying stock. The implied volatilities were obtained from publicly available data sources. For the weighted-average expected option life assumption, the Company considers the exercise behavior of past grants and models the pattern of aggregate exercises. The average risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury strip rate for the expected term of the options and the average dividend yield is based on historical experience.
Performance Share Units
During the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company granted 130,000 PSUs, which will be settled in stock subject to the achievement of the Companys net sales, diluted net earnings per common share and return on invested capital goals for the three fiscal years ending June 30, 2014. In September 2011, approximately 137,600 shares of the Companys Class A Common Stock were issued and related accrued dividends were paid, relative to the target goals set at the time of issuance, in settlement of 131,000 PSUs which vested as of June 30, 2011.
The following is a summary of the status of the Companys PSUs as of September 30, 2011 and activity during the three months then ended:
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
| |
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
| |
(Shares in thousands) |
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value Per |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Nonvested at June 30, 2011 |
|
349.9 |
|
$ |
46.71 |
|
Granted |
|
130.0 |
|
97.14 |
| |
Vested |
|
|
|
|
| |
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Nonvested at September 30, 2011 |
|
479.9 |
|
60.37 |
| |
Restricted Stock Units
The Company granted approximately 651,000 RSUs during the three months ended September 30, 2011 which, at the time of grant, were scheduled to vest as follows: 371,800 on October 31, 2011, 193,600 on October 31, 2012 and 85,600 on October 31, 2013, all subject to the continued employment or retirement of the grantees. Certain RSUs granted in fiscal 2012 are accompanied by dividend equivalent rights that will be payable in cash upon settlement of the RSU and, as such, were valued at the closing market value of the Companys Class A Common Stock on the date of grant. Other RSUs granted in fiscal 2012 are not accompanied by dividend equivalent rights and, as such, were valued at the closing market value of the Companys Class A Common Stock on the date of grant less the discounted present value of the dividends expected to be paid on the shares during the vesting period.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following is a summary of the status of the Companys RSUs as of September 30, 2011 and activity during the three months then ended:
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
| |
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
| |
(Shares in thousands) |
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value Per |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Nonvested at June 30, 2011 |
|
1,435.1 |
|
$ |
49.74 |
|
Granted |
|
651.0 |
|
97.19 |
| |
Vested |
|
(39.8 |
) |
33.50 |
| |
Forfeited |
|
(11.1 |
) |
57.60 |
| |
Nonvested at September 30, 2011 |
|
2,035.2 |
|
65.19 |
| |
Market Share Unit
As of September 30, 2011, the Company had outstanding one market share unit with a grant date fair value of $10.6 million that was estimated using a lattice model with a Monte Carlo simulation and the following assumptions: contractual life of 41 months, a weighted average expected volatility of 29%, a weighted average risk-free interest rate of 1.6% and a weighted average dividend yield of 1.0%. The Company used an expected stock-price volatility assumption that is a combination of both current and historical implied volatilities from options on the underlying stock. The implied volatilities were obtained from publicly available data sources. The expected life is equal to the contractual term of the grant. The average risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury strip rates over the contractual term of the grant and the average dividend yield is based on historical experience.
Share Units
The Company grants share units to certain non-employee directors under the Non-Employee Director Share Incentive Plan. The following is a summary of the status of the Companys share units as of September 30, 2011 and activity during the three months then ended:
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
| |
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
| |
(Shares in thousands) |
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value Per |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Outstanding at June 30, 2011 |
|
29.2 |
|
$ |
42.45 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
| |
Dividend equivalents |
|
|
|
|
| |
Converted |
|
|
|
|
| |
Outstanding at September 30, 2011 |
|
29.2 |
|
42.45 |
| |
Cash Units
Certain non-employee directors defer cash compensation in the form of cash payout share units, which are not subject to the Plans. These share units are classified as liabilities and, as such, their fair value is adjusted to reflect the current market value of the Companys Class A Common Stock. The Company recorded $1.5 million as compensation income and $0.7 million as compensation expense to reflect additional deferrals and the change in the market value for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 9 NET EARNINGS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC. PER COMMON SHARE
Net earnings attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. per common share (basic EPS) is computed by dividing net earnings attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and contingently issuable shares (which satisfy certain conditions). Net earnings attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. per common share assuming dilution (diluted EPS) is computed by reflecting potential dilution from stock-based awards.
A reconciliation between the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted EPS computations is as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
| ||||
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net earnings attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. |
|
$ |
278.6 |
|
$ |
191.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding Basic |
|
195.3 |
|
196.7 |
| ||
Effect of dilutive stock options |
|
3.2 |
|
2.8 |
| ||
Effect of restricted stock units |
|
1.0 |
|
0.9 |
| ||
Effect of market share unit |
|
0.1 |
|
|
| ||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding Diluted |
|
199.6 |
|
200.4 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net earnings attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. per common share: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic |
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
$ |
.97 |
|
Diluted |
|
1.40 |
|
.95 |
|
As of September 30, 2011 and 2010, outstanding options to purchase 1.6 million and 2.5 million shares, respectively, of Class A Common Stock were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. As of September 30, 2011 and 2010, 0.5 million of PSUs have been excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS because the number of shares ultimately issued is contingent on the achievement of certain performance targets of the Company, as discussed in Note 8.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 10 COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Comprehensive income (loss) and its components, net of tax, are as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
| ||||
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net earnings |
|
$ |
278.6 |
|
$ |
189.6 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net unrealized investment gain (loss) |
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
| ||
Net derivative instruments gain (loss) |
|
22.4 |
|
(8.8 |
) | ||
Amounts included in net periodic benefit cost, net |
|
7.2 |
|
(2.3 |
) | ||
Translation adjustments |
|
(114.4 |
) |
88.2 |
| ||
|
|
(85.0 |
) |
77.1 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
193.6 |
|
266.7 |
| ||
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net (earnings) loss |
|
|
|
1.5 |
| ||
Translation adjustments |
|
1.1 |
|
(1.5 |
) | ||
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. |
|
$ |
194.7 |
|
$ |
266.7 |
|
NOTE 11 EQUITY
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. |
|
Non- |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
|
Common |
|
Paid-in |
|
Retained |
|
AOCI |
|
Treasury |
|
Total |
|
controlling |
|
Total |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Balance June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
$ |
1,735.6 |
|
$ |
4,116.5 |
|
$ |
17.7 |
|
$ |
(3,243.1 |
) |
$ |
2,629.4 |
|
$ |
17.6 |
|
$ |
2,647.0 |
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
278.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
278.6 |
|
|
|
278.6 |
| ||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83.9 |
) |
|
|
(83.9 |
) |
(1.1 |
) |
(85.0 |
) | ||||||||
Acquisition of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(394.3 |
) |
(394.3 |
) |
|
|
(394.3 |
) | ||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
53.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
45.7 |
|
|
|
45.7 |
| ||||||||
Purchase of noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
0.2 |
|
|
| ||||||||
Balance September 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
$ |
1,789.2 |
|
$ |
4,395.1 |
|
$ |
(66.2 |
) |
$ |
(3,645.5 |
) |
$ |
2,475.3 |
|
$ |
16.7 |
|
$ |
2,492.0 |
|
Common Stock
During the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company purchased approximately 4,050,300 shares of its Class A Common Stock for $402.9 million.
Subsequent to September 30, 2011, the Company purchased approximately 926,900 additional shares of Class A Common Stock for $80.8 million pursuant to its share repurchase program.
THE ESTÉE LAUDER COMPANIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 12 STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Supplemental cash flow information for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash paid during the period for interest |
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
Cash paid during the period for income taxes |
|
$ |
27.7 |
|
$ |
12.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Incremental tax benefit from the exercise of stock options |
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
$ |
(1.8 |
) |
Capital lease obligations incurred |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
Interest rate swap derivative mark to market |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
NOTE 13 SEGMENT DATA AND RELATED INFORMATION
Reportable operating segments include components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker (the Chief Executive) in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Although the Company operates in one business segment, beauty products, management also evaluates performance on a product category basis. Product category performance is measured based upon net sales before returns associated with restructuring activities, and earnings before income taxes, net interest expense and total charges associated with restructuring activities. Returns and charges associated with restructuring activities are not allocated to the product categories because they result from activities that are deemed a company-wide program to redesign the Companys organizational structure.
The accounting policies for the Companys reportable segments are substantially the same as those for the consolidated financial statements, as described in the notes to consolidated financial statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011. The assets and liabilities of the Company are managed centrally and are reported internally in the same manner as the consolidated financial statements; thus, no additional information is produced for the Chief Executive or included herein. There has been no significant variance in the total or long-lived asset values associated with the Companys segment data since June 30, 2011.