Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

OR

For the transition period from                    to                      .

Commission file number 0001-34145

Primoris Services Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (214) 740-5600

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o No x

At August 6, 2013, 51,571,394 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

Table of Contents

PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION

INDEX

2

Table of Contents

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In Thousands, Except Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

3

Table of Contents

PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

4

Table of Contents

PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

5

Table of Contents

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

6

Table of Contents

PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

Note 1—Nature of Business

Organization and operations — Primoris Services Corporation is a holding company of various subsidiaries which, collectively, are engaged in various construction and product engineering activities. The Company’s underground and directional drilling operations install, replace and repair natural gas, petroleum, telecommunications and water pipeline systems, including large diameter pipeline systems. The Company’s industrial, civil and engineering operations build and provide maintenance services to industrial facilities including power plants, petrochemical facilities, and other processing plants; construct multi-level parking structures; and engage in the construction of highways, bridges and other environmental construction activities. The Company is incorporated in the State of Delaware and its corporate headquarters are located at 2100 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1500, Dallas, Texas 75201.

The wholly-owned subsidiaries of Primoris include ARB, Inc. (“ARB”), ARB Structures, Inc., All Day Electric Company, Inc., OnQuest, Inc. (parent of OnQuest Canada, ULC, prior to January 1, 2013 Born Heaters Canada, ULC), Cardinal Contractors, Inc., Stellaris, LLC, James Construction Group LLC (“JCG”), Rockford Corporation (“Rockford”) and Primoris Energy Services Corporation (“PES”).  Primoris has been acquisitive over the last several years expanding both service capabilities and geographic footprint.  The acquisitions in 2012 included the purchase of Sprint Pipeline Services, L.P. (“Sprint”), the purchase of certain assets of Silva Contracting Company, Inc., Tarmac Materials, LLC and C3 Interest, LLC (collectively “Silva”), The Saxon Group (“Saxon”) and the acquisition of Q3 Contracting, Inc. (“Q3C”).

The Company is a party to the Blythe Power Constructors joint venture for the installation of a parabolic trough solar field and steam generation system in California.

On March 11, 2013, the Company’s subsidiary, PES, purchased the assets of Force Specialty Services Inc. (“FSSI”) which specializes in turn-around work at refineries and chemical plants in the Gulf Coast area.

Unless specifically noted otherwise, as used throughout these consolidated financial statements, “Primoris”, “the Company”, “we”, “our”, “us” or “its” refers to the business, operations and financial results of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Note 2—Basis of Presentation

Interim consolidated financial statements — The interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the three-month  and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 have been prepared in accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). As such, certain disclosures, which would substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in the Company’s latest audited consolidated financial statements, have been omitted.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013 (the “Second Quarter 2013 Report”) should be read in concert with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 7, 2013, which contains the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012.  The interim financial information is unaudited.  In the opinion of management, the unaudited information includes all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for the fair presentation of the interim financial information.

Revenue recognition

Fixed-price contracts — Historically, a substantial portion of the Company’s revenue has been generated under fixed-price contracts. For fixed-price contracts, the Company recognizes revenues using the percentage-of-completion method, which may result in uneven and irregular results. Unforeseen events and circumstances can alter the estimate of the costs and potential profit associated with a particular contract.  Total estimated costs, and thus contract revenues and income, can be impacted by changes in any of the following:  productivity, scheduling, the unit cost of labor, subcontracts, materials and equipment. Additionally, external factors such as weather, client needs, client delays in providing permits and approvals, labor availability, governmental regulation and politics may affect the progress of a project’s completion and thus the timing of revenue recognition.  To the extent that original cost estimates are modified, estimated costs to complete increase, delivery schedules are delayed, or progress under a contract is otherwise impeded, cash flow, revenue recognition and profitability from a particular contract may be adversely affected.

7

Table of Contents

In the percentage-of-completion method, estimated revenues and resulting contract income is calculated based on the total costs incurred to date as a percentage of total estimated costs. If an estimate of total contract cost indicates a loss on a contract, the projected loss is recognized in full at the time of the estimate.  The loss amount is recognized as an “accrued loss provision” and is included in the accrued expenses and other liabilities amount on the balance sheet.  As the percentage-of-completion method is used to calculate revenues, the accrued loss provision is changed so that the gross profit for the contract is zero.

Other contract forms — The Company also uses unit-price, time and material, and cost reimbursable plus fee contracts.  For these jobs, revenue is recognized based on contractual terms.  For example, time and material contract revenues are recognized based on purchasing and employee time records.  Similarly, unit price contracts recognize revenue based on accomplishment of specific units at a specified unit price.

For all of its contracts, the Company includes the provision for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts in accrued expenses. Changes in job performance, job conditions and estimated profitability, including those arising from final contract settlements, may result in revisions to costs and income. These revisions are recognized in the period in which the revisions are identified. Claims are included in the calculation of revenues when realization is probable and amounts can be reliably determined. Revenues in excess of contract costs incurred on claims are recognized when the amounts have been agreed upon with the customer.

The caption “Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings” represents unbilled receivables which arise when revenues have been recorded but the amount has not been billed under the terms of the contract until a later date.  Balances may represent:  (a) unbilled amounts arising from the use of the percentage-of-completion method of accounting which may not be billed under the terms of the contract until a later date, (b) incurred costs to be billed under cost reimbursement type contracts, or (c) amounts arising from routine lags in billing.  For those contracts in which billings exceed contract revenues recognized to date, excesses are included in the caption “Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings”.

The Company considers unapproved change orders to be contract variations for which we have customer approval for a change in scope but for which we do not have an agreed upon price change.  Costs associated with unapproved change orders are included in the estimated cost to complete the contracts and are treated as project costs as incurred. The Company recognizes revenue equal to costs incurred on unapproved change orders when realization of price approval is probable and the estimated revenue amount is equal to or greater than the costs related to the unapproved change order. Unapproved change orders involve the use of estimates, and it is reasonably possible that revisions to the estimated costs and recoverable amounts may be required in future reporting periods to reflect changes in estimates or final agreements with customers.

The Company considers claims to be amounts Primoris seeks, or will seek, to collect from customers or others for customer-caused changes in contract specifications or design, or other customer-related causes of unanticipated additional contract costs on which there is no agreement with customers on both scope and price changes. Revenue in excess of contract costs from claims is recognized when agreement is reached with customers as to the value of the claims, which in some instances may not occur until after completion of work under the contract. Costs associated with claims are included in the estimated costs to complete the contracts and are treated as project costs when incurred.

In accordance with applicable terms of construction contracts, certain retainage amounts may be withheld by customers until completion and acceptance of the project.  Some payments of the retainage may not be received for a significant period after completion of our portion of a project.

Significant revision in contract estimate — As previously discussed, revenue recognition is based on the percentage-of-completion method for firm fixed-price contracts. Under this method, the costs incurred to date as a percentage of total estimated costs are used to calculate the revenue to be recognized. Total estimated costs, and thus contract income, are impacted by many factors.

For projects that were in process in the prior year, but are either completed or continue to be in process during the current year, there can be a difference in revenues and profits related to the prior year, had current year estimates of costs to complete been known in the prior year.

Customer Concentration — The Company operates in multiple industry segments encompassing the construction of commercial, industrial and public works infrastructure assets throughout primarily the United States. Typically, the top ten customers in any one calendar year generate revenues in excess of 50% of total revenues and consist of a different group of customers in each year.

During the three-months and six-months ending June 30, 2013, revenues generated by the top ten customers were $216 million and $443 million, respectively, which represented 48.6% and 51.9%, respectively, of total revenues during the periods.  During the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2013, a large gas and electric utility represented 7.6% and 8.0%, respectively, of total revenues and a large pipeline company represented 8.2% and 5.0%, respectively, of total revenues.

8

Table of Contents

During the three and six months ending June 30, 2012, revenues generated by the top ten customers were $185 million and $364 million, respectively, which represented 54.8% and 57.9%, respectively, of total revenues during the periods.  During the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2012, the Louisiana DOT represented 11.6% and 13.3%, respectively, of total revenues and a large gas and electric utility represented 12.1% and 11.9%, respectively, of total revenues.

At June 30, 2013, approximately 6.5% of the Company’s accounts receivable were due from one customer, and that customer provided 6.4% of the Company’s revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2013.  At June 30, 2012, approximately 6.8% of the Company’s accounts receivable were due from one customer, and that customer provided 4.1% of the Company’s revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Multiemployer Plans — The Company participates and contributes to a number of multiemployer benefit plans for its union employees at rates determined by the various collective bargaining agreements.  The trustees for each multiemployer plan determines the eligibility and allocations of contributions and benefit amounts, determines the types of benefits and administers the plan.  The potential withdrawal obligation may be significant.  Any withdrawal liability would be recorded when it is probable that a liability exists and can be reasonably estimated, in accordance with GAAP.  In November 2011, the Company withdrew from the Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund multiemployer pension plan.  At June 30, 2013, the Company had recorded a withdrawal liability of $7.5 million on its balance sheet.  The Company has no plans to withdraw from any other agreements.  See Note 19 — Commitments and Contingencies.

Inventory and uninstalled contract materials — Inventory consists of expendable construction materials and small tools that will be used in construction projects and is valued at the lower of cost, using first-in, first-out method, or market.  Uninstalled contract materials include certain job specific materials not yet installed which are valued using the specific identification method.

Note 3—Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-01, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements established by ASU 2011-11 , “Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities”.  The ASU is effective for the fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within.  Retrospective application is required for any period presented that begins before the entity’s initial application of the new requirements.  The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-04, Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)  (“ASU 2013-04”).  ASU 2013-04 provides guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this guidance is fixed at the reporting date. This ASU is an update to FASB ASC Topic 405, “Liabilities”. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on its financial statements.

Note 4—Fair Value Measurements

ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, defines fair value in GAAP, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures about fair value measurements.  ASC Topic 820 requires that certain financial assets and financial liabilities be re-measured and reported at fair value each reporting period and that other non-financial assets and liabilities be re-measured and reported at fair value on a non-recurring basis.  ASC Topic 820 also establishes three reporting levels for fair value measurements.

In general, fair values determined by Level 1 use quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs use data points that are observable such as quoted prices, interest rates and yield curves. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs are “unobservable data points” for an asset or liability and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.

The following table presents, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels identified under ASC Topic 820, the Company’s financial assets that are required to be measured at fair value at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

9

Table of Contents

Short-term investments consist primarily of Certificates of Deposit (“CDs”) purchased through the CDARS (Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service) process and U.S. Treasury bills with various financial institutions that are backed by the federal government FDIC program.

Other financial instruments of the Company consist of accounts receivable, accounts payable and certain accrued liabilities.  These financial instruments generally approximate fair value based on their short-term nature.  The carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt approximates fair value based on comparison with current prevailing market rates for loans of similar risks and maturities.

The following table provides a rollforward of the Company’s contingent consideration liability Level 3 fair value measurements during the six months ended June 30, 2013:

On a quarterly basis, the Company assesses the estimated fair value of the contractual obligation to pay the contingent consideration and any changes in estimated fair value are recorded as other non-operating expense or income in the Company’s statement of operations.  Fluctuations in the fair value of contingent consideration are impacted by two unobservable inputs, management’s estimate of the probability (which range from 33% to 95%) of the acquired company meeting the contractual operating performance target and the estimated discount rate (a rate that approximates the Company’s cost of capital). Significant changes in either of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly different fair value measurement.  Generally, a change in the assumption of the probability of meeting the performance target is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the fair value of contingent consideration liability, whereas a change in assumption of the estimated discount rate is accompanied by a directionally opposite change in the fair value of contingent consideration liability.

Note 5—Accounts Receivable

The following is a summary of the Company’s accounts receivable:

Note 6—Costs and Estimated Earnings on Uncompleted Contracts

Costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts consist of the following at:

10

Table of Contents

This amount is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet under the following captions:

Note 7—Equity Method Investments

WesPac Energy LLC

On July 1, 2010, the Company acquired a 50% membership interest in WesPac Energy LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (“WesPac”), from Kealine Holdings, LLC (“Kealine”), a Nevada limited liability company.  Kealine holds the remaining 50% membership interest in WesPac.  WesPac develops pipeline and terminal projects in the United States, Canada and Mexico.  We have no future obligation to make any additional investments into WesPac. All key investment, management and operating decisions of WesPac require unanimous approval from a management committee equally represented by Kealine and us.  The Company believes the ownership interest in WesPac broadens its exposure to construction opportunities across North America.

The following is a summary of the financial position and results as of and for the periods ended:

St.—Bernard Levee Partners

The Company purchased a 30% interest in St.—Bernard Levee Partners (“Bernard”) in the fourth quarter 2009 for $300 and accounts for this investment under the equity method.  Bernard engaged in construction activities in Louisiana, and all work was completed January 2013.  Bernard distributed $490 and $4,200 to its equity holders during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, of which, the Company’s share, as calculated under the joint venture agreement, was $145 and $1,260 for the same periods in 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The following is a summary of the financial position and results as of and for the periods ended:

11

Table of Contents

Alvah, Inc.

As part of the acquisition of Q3C, the Company acquired a 49% membership interest in Alvah, Inc., a California corporation (“Alvah”).  Alvah is engaged in electrical contracting activities, primarily in Northern California and worked as a subcontractor for ARB prior to the Q3C acquisition. Alvah has continued to work for ARB subsequent to the acquisition.  In December 2012, Alvah distributed $200, of which the Company’s share was $98.  During the three and six months ending June 30, 2013, payments made by ARB to Alvah were $1,423 and $2,909, respectively, and payments made by Q3C were $0 and $212, respectively.  For the same periods in the prior year, ARB made payments of $908 and $2,153, respectively and Q3C made payments of $115 and $233, respectively.

The following is a summary of the financial position and results as of and for the period ended:

Because Alvah was not acquired until November 2012, there was no activity in the prior year.

Note 8 — Business Combinations

2013 Acquisition - FSSI

On March 11, 2013, the Company’s subsidiary, PES, purchased the assets of Force Specialty Services Inc. (“FSSI”) which specializes in turn-around work at refineries and chemical plants in the Gulf Coast area.  Based in the greater Houston, Texas area, FSSI’s location provides a presence and convenient access to refineries in south Texas, the Houston ship channel and Louisiana.

12

Table of Contents

The fair value of the consideration for the acquisition was $2,377.  Consideration consisted of cash totaling $1,675, of which $1,025 was paid at closing and $650 was paid in the second quarter 2013.  The agreement provides for three future potential payments, contingent upon FSSI meeting certain operating performance targets for the remainder of calendar year 2013 and calendar years 2014 and 2015.

The contingent consideration is as follows:  (1) $500 in cash for the achievement of pretax income of at least $553 for the remainder of the year ending December 31, 2013; (2) a payment of $500 in cash if pretax income for the year 2014 is at least $2,502; and (3), a payment of $500 in cash if pretax income for the year 2015 is at least $4,227.  The estimated fair value of the potential contingent consideration on the acquisition date was $702 and at June 30, 2013 was $721.

The asset purchase agreement also included a provision that PES pay $1,000 for a five-year employment, non-competition and non-solicitation agreement with a key employee.  If the employee violates the agreement or terminates his employment prior to the end of the five-year period, he is required to repay the unamortized amount of the $1,000 payment.  This agreement has been accounted for as a prepaid asset and is being amortized equally over the five-year period.

At closing the Company received $302 in small tools inventory, $448 in property, plant and equipment, and recorded accounts payable of $1,060.

The acquisition was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting.  The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were measured at their estimated fair value at the acquisition date.  The FSSI purchase was included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2013.  During the period subsequent to its March 11, 2013 acquisition date, FSSI contributed revenues of $2,990 and $3,473 and gross profit of $183 and $311, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.

During the second quarter 2013, the Company finalized its estimates of the fair value of the contingent consideration, intangible assets and goodwill for the acquisition.  The final revision resulted in a change from the estimated values recorded at March 31, 2013, including a decrease in the fair value of the contingent consideration of $136, increases in intangible assets of $800 and a decrease of $936 for goodwill.

The customer relationships were valued at $950 utilizing the “excess earnings method” of the income approach.  The estimated discounted cash flows associated with existing customers and projects were based on historical and market participant data.  Such discounted cash flows were net of fair market returns on the various tangible and intangible assets that are necessary to realize the potential cash flows.

The fair value of the tradename of $550 was determined based on the “relief from royalty” method.  A royalty rate was selected based on consideration of several factors, including external research of third party tradename licensing agreements and their royalty rate levels, and management estimates.  The useful life was estimated at five years based on management’s expectation for continuing value of the tradename in the future.

The fair value for the non-compete agreement of $100 was based on a discounted “income approach” model, including estimated financial results with and without the non-compete agreement in place.  The agreement was analyzed based on the potential impact of competition that certain individuals could have on the financial results, assuming the agreement was not in place.  An estimate of the probability of competition was applied and the results were compared to a similar model assuming the agreement was in place.

Goodwill of $1,087 largely consists of expected benefits from the greater presence and convenient access to south Texas, the Houston ship channel and Louisiana and FSSI’s expertise in turn-around work for refineries and chemical plants.  Goodwill also includes the value of the assembled workforce of the FSSI business.  Based on the current tax treatment, goodwill and other intangible assets will be deductible for income tax purposes over a fifteen-year period.

2012 Acquisition - Sprint Pipeline Services, L.P.

The March 12, 2012 acquisition of Sprint was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting.  The fair value of the consideration totaled $28,377, which included cash payments of $21,197, Company stock valued at $980 (or 62,052 shares of restricted common stock) and contingent consideration of $6,200.

The contingent consideration was as follows:  If income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) for 2012, as defined in the purchase agreement, was at least $7,000, we would pay $4,000 in cash to the sellers. The earnout target was achieved in 2012 and was paid in April 2013.

The 2013 earnout target provides for an additional cash payment of $4,000 to the sellers if 2013 EBITDA is at least $7,750.  The estimated fair value of the 2013 contingent consideration as of the acquisition date was $2,745 and at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration was $3,205 and $3,020, respectively.

13

Table of Contents

2012 Acquisition - Silva Companies

The May 30, 2012 acquisition of Silva was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting.  The fair value of the consideration was $14,090.

2012 Acquisition - The Saxon Group

The September 28, 2012 acquisition of Saxon was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting.  The fair value of the consideration was $550 in cash, payment of a banknote for $2,429, and contingent consideration valued at $1,950 for total consideration of $4,929.

The contingent consideration included an earnout where the Company would pay $2,500 to the sellers, contingent upon Saxon meeting one of the following two targets:  (1) EBITDA for the fifteen month period ending December 31, 2013 of at least $4,000 or; (2) EBITDA for the twenty-one month period ending June 30, 2014 of at least $4,750.  The estimated fair value of the contingent consideration on the acquisition date was $1,950.  The estimated fair value of the contingent consideration was $2,184 and $2,028 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

2012 Acquisition — Q3 Contracting

The November 17, 2012 acquisition of Q3C was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting.  The fair value of the consideration totaled $55,994, and included a cash payment of $48,116, a contingent earnout with a fair value of $7,448 and payment of $430 in Company common stock.  In January 2013, we issued 29,273 shares of unregistered stock.

The contingent consideration included an earnout whereby the Company would pay additional cash to the sellers contingent on Q3C meeting certain operating performance targets.  The targets were based on obtaining certain levels of Q3C’s EBITDA as that term is defined in the stock purchase agreement.  The targets are as follows:

1.                                   If EBITDA for the period November 18, 2012 through December 31, 2013 is at least $17,700, the Company agreed to pay $3,750 in cash to the sellers, with an additional cash payment of $1,250 if EBITDA exceeds $19,000.

2.                                   If EBITDA for the calendar year 2014 is at least $19,000, the Company agreed to pay $3,750 in cash to the sellers, with an additional cash payment of $1,250 if EBITDA exceeds $22,000.

The fair value of the contingent consideration was estimated at $7,450 as of the purchase date and is included on the Company’s balance sheet as a liability.  The fair value is based on management’s evaluation of the probability of Q3C meeting the EBITDA targets for the two periods, discounted at the Company’s estimated average cost of capital.  The estimated fair value at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $7,862 and $7,490, respectively.

Supplemental Unaudited Pro Forma Information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

In accordance with ASC Topic 805 we are combining the pro forma information for the FSSI, Sprint, Silva, Saxon and Q3C acquisitions (“the Acquisitions”).  The following pro forma information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 presents the combined results of operations of the Acquisitions combined, as if the Acquisitions had each occurred at the beginning of 2012. The supplemental pro forma information has been adjusted to include:

·                                          the pro forma impact of amortization of intangible assets and depreciation of property, plant and equipment, based on the purchase price allocations;

·                                          the pro forma impact of the expense associated with the amortization of the discount for the fair value of the contingent consideration for potential earnout liabilities that may be achieved in 2013 for the Sprint and FSSI acquisitions and 2013 or 2014 for the Saxon, Q3C and FSSI acquisitions;

·                                          the pro forma tax effect of both the income before income taxes and the pro forma adjustments, calculated using a tax rate of 39.0% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and the applicable periods in 2013; and

·                                          the pro forma increase in weighted average shares outstanding including 62,052 unregistered shares of common stock issued as part of the Sprint acquisition and 29,273 shares of unregistered common stock issued as part of the Q3C acquisition.

14

Table of Contents

The pro forma results are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of, or intended to represent, the results that would have been achieved had the Acquisitions been completed on January 1, 2012.  For example, the pro forma results do not reflect any operating efficiencies and associated cost savings that the Company might have achieved with respect to the combined companies.

Note 9—Intangible Assets

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, intangible assets totaled $49,893 and $51,978, respectively, net of amortization.  The June 30, 2013 balance includes the effect of the FSSI acquisition (See Note 8).  The table below summarizes the intangible asset categories, amounts and the average amortization periods, which are generally on a straight-line basis, as follows:

Amortization expense of intangible assets was $1,891 and $1,447 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $3,685 and $3,193, respectively.  Estimated future amortization expense for intangible assets is as follows:

Note 10—Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, accounts payable included retention amounts of approximately $12,171 and $15,946, respectively.  These amounts are due to subcontractors but have been retained pending contract completion and customer acceptance of jobs.

The following is a summary of accrued expenses and other current liabilities at:

15

Table of Contents

Note 11—Credit Arrangements

Revolving Credit Facility

As of June 30, 2013, the Company had a revolving credit facility (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement was entered into by and among the Company, The PrivateBank and Trust Company, as administrative agent (the “Administrative Agent”) and co-lead arranger, The Bank of the West, as co-lead arranger and IBERIABANK Corporation (the “Lenders”). The Credit Agreement is a $75 million revolving credit facility whereby the lenders agree to make loans on a revolving basis from time to time and to issue letters of credit for up to the $75 million committed amount. The Credit Agreement also provides for an incremental facility of up to $50 million. The termination date of the Credit Agreement is December 28, 2017.

The principal amount of any loans under the Credit Agreement will bear interest at either: (i) LIBOR plus an applicable margin as specified in the Credit Agreement (based on the Company’s senior debt to EBITDA ratio), or (ii) the Base Rate (which is the greater of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% or (b) the prime rate as announced by the Administrative Agent). Quarterly non-use fees, letter of credit fees and administrative agent fees are payable at rates specified in the Credit Agreement.

The principal amount of any loan drawn under the Credit Agreement may be prepaid in whole or in part, with a minimum prepayment of $5 million, at any time, potentially subject to make-whole provisions.

The Credit Agreement includes customary restrictive covenants for facilities of this type, as discussed below.

Commercial letters of credit amounted to $5,659 at June 30, 2013 and $4,808 at December 31, 2012.  Other than the commercial letters of credit, there were no borrowings under this line of credit during the six months ended June 30, 2013, leaving available borrowing capacity at $69,341 at June 30, 2013.

As part of the execution of the Credit Agreement, the previous Loan and Security Agreement dated October 29, 2009, as amended, between the Company and The Private Bank and Trust Company (the “PrivateBank Agreement”), was terminated.  There were no borrowings outstanding at the time of the termination and all letter of credit amounts issued and outstanding under the terminated agreement were transferred to the Lenders under the Credit Agreement discussed above.

Senior Secured Notes and Shelf Agreement

On December 28, 2012, the Company entered into a $50 million Senior Secured Notes purchase (“Senior Notes”) and a $25 million private shelf agreement (the “Notes Agreement”) by and among the Company and The Prudential Investment Management, Inc. and certain Prudential affiliates (the “Noteholders”).

A total of $50 million in Senior Notes was funded on December 28, 2012. The Senior Notes are due December 28, 2022 and bear interest at an annual rate of 3.65%, paid quarterly in arrears. Annual principal payments of $7.1 million are required beginning December 28, 2016 through December 28, 2021 with a final payment due on December 28, 2022. The principal amount may be prepaid in whole or in part, with a minimum prepayment of $5 million, at any time, subject to make-whole provisions.

The Notes Agreement provides for the issuance of additional notes of up to $25 million, during the first three years of the Notes Agreement with maturity dates no more than 10 years from the date issued, at the market interest rate for notes with equivalent terms and conditions.

All loans made under both the Credit Agreement and the Notes Agreement are secured by our assets, including, among others, our cash, inventory, goods, equipment (excluding equipment subject to permitted liens) and accounts receivable. All of our domestic subsidiaries have issued joint and several guaranties in favor of the Lenders and Noteholders for all amounts under the Credit Agreement and Notes Agreement.

16

Table of Contents

Both the Credit Agreement and the Notes Agreement contain various restrictive and financial covenants including among others, minimum tangible net worth, senior debt/EBITDA ratio, debt service coverage requirements and a minimum balance for unencumbered net book value for fixed assets. In addition, the agreements include restrictions on investments, change of control provisions and provisions in the event the Company disposes more than 20% of its total assets.