Edgar Filing: RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[x] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: March 31, 2006

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________ to _____________

Commission File Number: 000-50283

RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware	04-3625550
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

1227 120^th Avenue N.E., Bellevue, WA 98005

Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(425) 943-4599

(Issuer’s Telephone Number, including Area Code)

N/A

(Former Name, Former Address, and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [x] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definitions of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer [ ]

Accelerated filer [ ]

Non-accelerated filer [x]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [x]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: There were 33,611,639 issued and outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $.001 per share, as of May 8, 2006.

RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.

(f/k/a Golf Two, Inc.)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Condensed Financial Statements - Unaudited

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005	3

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations Three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005	4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity	5

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005	6

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations	15

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	23

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	23

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	24

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	24

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	24

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	24

Item 4.	Submission of Matter to a Vote of Security Holders	24

Item 5.	Other Information	24

Item 6.	Exhibits	24

RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.

(f/k/a Golf Two, Inc.)

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

ASSETS
		March 31,			December 31,
		2006			2005
		(unaudited)

Current assets -
Cash and cash equivalents	$	730,613		$	5,266,451
Accounts receivable, net of allowance		6,622,257			-
for doubtful accounts of approximately $353,000
Other receivables		102,637			25,055
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		183,186			-
Total current assets		7,638,693			5,291,506

Goodwill and acquired intangibles, net		7,676,722			-
Furniture and equipment, net		242,103			-
Employee loan receivable		119,900			-
Investment in real estate		20,000			-
Deposits and other assets		55,602			15,907

	$	15,753,020		$	5,307,413


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Current liabilities -
Accounts payable	$	3,979,039		$	-
Accrued transportation costs		1,062,362			-
Commissions payable		249,586			-
Other accrued costs		536,013			148,388
Income taxes payable		1,009,135			-
Total current liabilities		6,836,135			148,388


Long term debt		1,781,070			-
Deferred tax liability		874,412			-
Total liabilities		9,491,617			148,388

Commitments & contingencies		-			-

Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized;
no shares issued or outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized;
33,611,639 issued and outstanding		15,067			12,590
Additional paid-in capital		6,615,719			5,488,707
Accumulated deficit		(369,383	)		(342,272	)

Total Stockholders’ equity		6,261,403			5,159,025

	$	15,753,020		$	5,307,413

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.

(f/k/a Golf Two, Inc.)

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(unaudited)


		FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
		2006			2005
Revenue	$	11,842,717		$	-
Cost of transportation		7,479,707			-
Net revenues		4,363,010			-


Agent Commissions		3,197,709			-
Personnel costs		639,087			-
Selling, general and administrative expenses		447,008			13,830
Depreciation and amortization		206,103			-

Loss from operations		(126,897	)		(13,830	)

Other income (expense):
Interest income		11,466			-
Interest expense		(13,324	)		(500	)

Loss before income tax expense (benefit)		(128,755	)		(14,330	)

Income tax expense (benefit)		(101,645	)		-

Net loss	$	(27,110	)	$	(14,330	)

Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	$	0.00		$	0.00
Weighted average basic and diluted
common shares outstanding		32,754,957			25,964,179

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.

(f/k/a Golf Two, Inc.)

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

				ADDITIONAL					TOTAL
	COMMON STOCK				PAID-IN		ACCUMULATED			STOCKHOLDERS'
	SHARES		AMOUNT		CAPITAL		DEFICIT			EQUITY
Balance at January 1, 2006	31,135,849	$	12,590	$	5,488,708	$	(342,273	)	$	5,159,025

Issuance of common stock for cash
at $0.44 per share (January 2006)(unaudited)	1,009,093		1,010		442,673		-			443,683
Issuance of common stock for cash
at $0.44 per share (February 2006)(unaudited)	1,466,697		1,467		641,528		-			642,995
Share based compensation	-		-		42,810		-			42,810
Net loss for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 (unaudited)	-		-		-		(27,110	)		(27,110	)
Balance at March 31, 2006	33,611,639	$	15,067	$	6,615,719	$	(369,383	)	$	6,261,403

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.

(f/k/a Golf Two, Inc.)

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

	FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENED MARCH 31,
		2006			2005
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(27,110	)	$	(14,330	)
ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET LOSS TO NET CASH
PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
non-cash contribution to capital (rent)		-			300
non-cash compensation expense (stock options)		42,810			-
amortization of intangibles		170,200			-
depreciation and amortization		(21,965	)		-
allowance for doubtful accounts		135,000			-

CHANGE IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES -
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,672,183			-
accounts payable and accrued expenses		(2,223,497	)		4,247
Total adjustments		(225,269	)		4,457
Net cash provided by (used for)
operating activities		(252,379	)		(9,783	)
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisition of Airgroup, net of acquired cash (See Note 3)		(7,302,220	)		-
Proceeds from sale of investments		208,236			-

Net cash used for investing		(7,093,984	)		-
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from notes payable, stockholders		24,909
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		1,086,679			-
Net proceeds from credit facility		1,281,070			-
Payment of credit facility fees		(57,224	)		-
Long term debt for acquisition		500,000			-
Net cash provided by financing activities		2,810,525			24,909
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		(4,535,838	)		15,126
CASH, BEGINNING OF THE PERIOD		5,266,451			19,487
CASH, END OF PERIOD	$	730,613		$	34,613
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Income taxes paid	$	524,907		$	800
Interest paid	$	13,324		$	-

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.

(f/k/a Golf Two, Inc.)

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activities:

In the first quarter of 2005, an officer of the Company provides office space to the Company for $100 per month on a month-to-month basis, which was recorded as a contribution to capital. Total office expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005 amounted to $300.

On March 1, 2005, the Company was loaned $24,909 by a stockholder in exchange for a promissory note which was non-interest bearing. Interest was not imputed as the amount would be immaterial to the financial position at March 31, 2005 and results of operations over the 5 years of accretion.

RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.

(f/k/a Golf Two, Inc.)

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

NOTE 1 - NATURE OF OPERATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

General

Radiant Logistics, Inc. (formerly known as “Golf Two, Inc”) (the “Company”) was formed under the laws of the state of Delaware on March 15, 2001 and from inception through the third quarter of 2005, the Company's principal business strategy focused on the development of retail golf stores. In October 2005, our management team consisting of Bohn H. Crain and Stephen M. Cohen completed a change of control transaction when they acquired a majority of the Company’s outstanding securities from the Company’s former officers and directors in privately negotiated transactions. In conjunction with the change of control transaction, we: (i) elected to discontinue the Company’s former business model; (ii) repositioned ourselves as a global transportation and supply chain management company; and (iii) changed our name to “Radiant Logistics, Inc.” to, among other things, better align our name with our new business focus.

Through the strategic acquisition of regional best-of-breed non-asset based transportation and logistics service providers, we intend to build a leading global transportation and supply-chain management company offering a full range of domestic and international freight forwarding and other value added supply chain management services, including order fulfillment, inventory management and warehousing.

Our strategy has been designed to take advantage of shifting market dynamics. The third party logistics industry continues to grow as an increasing number of businesses outsource their logistics functions to more cost effectively manage and extract value from their supply chains. Also, the industry is positioned for further consolidation as it remains highly fragmented, and as customers are demanding the types of sophisticated and broad reaching service offerings that can more effectively be handled by larger more diverse organizations.

Our acquisition strategy relies upon two primary factors: first, our ability to identify and acquire target businesses that fit within our general acquisition criteria, and second, the continued availability of capital and financing resources sufficient to complete these acquisitions. As to our first factor, following our recent acquisition of Airgroup Corporation (“Airgroup”), we have identified a number of additional companies that may be suitable acquisition candidates and are in preliminary discussions with a select number of them. As to our second factor, our ability to secure additional financing will rely upon the sale of debt or equity securities, and the development of an active trading market for our securities, neither of which can be assured.

Our growth strategy relies upon a number of factors, including our ability to efficiently integrate the businesses of the companies we acquire, generate the anticipated economies of scale from the integration, and maintain the historic sales growth of the acquired businesses in order to generate continued organic growth. There are a variety of risks associated with our ability to achieve our strategic objectives, including our ability to acquire and profitably manage additional businesses and the intense competition in our industry for customers and for the acquisition of additional businesses.

We accomplished the first step in our strategy by completing the acquisition of Airgroup effective as of January 1, 2006. Airgroup is a Seattle, Washington based non-asset based logistics company that provides domestic and international freight forwarding services through a network of 34 exclusive agent offices across North America. Airgroup services a diversified account base including manufacturers, distributors and retailers using a network of independent carriers and over 100 international agents positioned strategically around the world.

Prior to our acquisition of Airgroup, we operated as a development stage company under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 7. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X related to interim period financial statements and, therefore, do not include all information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles. However, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position of the Company at March 31, 2006 and the Company’s consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2006 have been included. The results of operations for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year. Reference should be made to the annual financial statements, including footnotes thereto, included in the Company’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the SEC on March 17, 2006.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

a) Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Such estimates include revenue recognition, accruals for the cost of purchased transportation, accounting for stock options, the assessment of the recoverability of long-lived assets (specifically goodwill and acquired intangibles), the establishment of an allowance for doubtful accounts and the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the effects of revisions are reflected in the period that they are determined to be necessary. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

b) Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash equivalents include all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less which are not securing any corporate obligations.

c) Concentration

The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts, which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

d) Goodwill

We follow the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 142 requires an annual impairment test for goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 142, the first step of the impairment test requires that we determine the fair value of each reporting unit, and compare the fair value to the reporting unit's carrying amount. To the extent a reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an indication exists that the reporting unit's goodwill may be impaired and we must perform a second more detailed impairment assessment. The second impairment assessment involves allocating the reporting unit’s fair value to all of its recognized and unrecognized assets and liabilities in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill as of the assessment date. The implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is then compared to the carrying amount of goodwill to quantify an impairment charge as of the assessment date. In the future, we will perform our annual impairment test effective as of April 1 of each year, unless events or circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred before that time.

e) Long-Lived Assets

Acquired intangibles consist of customer related intangibles and non-compete agreements arising from our acquisitions. Customer related intangibles are amortized using accelerated methods over approximately 5 years and non-compete agreements are amortized using the straight line method over a 5 year period.

We follow the provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which establishes accounting standards for the impairment of long-lived assets such as property, plant and equipment and intangible assets subject to amortization. We review long-lived assets to be held-and-used for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. If the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows over the remaining useful life of a long-lived asset is less than its carrying amount, the asset is considered to be impaired. Impairment losses are measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. When fair values are not available, we estimate fair value using the expected future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risks associated with the recovery of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

f) Commitments

The company has operating lease commitments some of which are for office and warehouse space and are under non-cancelable operating leases expiring at various dates through December 2010. Annual commitments, 2006 through 2010, respectively, are $76,000, $64,000, $64,000, $64,000, and $32,000 thereafter.

g) Income Taxes

Taxes on income are provided in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been reflected in the consolidated financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the book values and the tax bases of particular assets and liabilities and the tax effects of net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using tax rates in effect for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided to offset the net deferred tax assets if, based upon the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

h) Revenue Recognition and Purchased Transportation Costs

We recognize revenue on a gross basis, in accordance with EITF 99-19, "Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net", as a result of the following: We are the primary obligor responsible for providing the service desired by the customer and are responsible for fulfillment, including the acceptability of the service(s) ordered or purchased by the customer. We, at our sole discretion, set the prices charged to our customers, and are not required to obtain approval or consent from any other party in establishing our prices. We have multiple suppliers for the services we sell to our customers, and have the absolute and complete discretion and right to select the supplier that will provide the product(s) or service(s) ordered by a customer, including changing the supplier on a shipment-by-shipment basis. In most cases, we determine the nature, type, characteristics, and specifications of the service(s) ordered by the customer. We also assume credit risk for the amount billed to the customer.

As a non-asset based carrier, we do not own transportation assets. We generate the major portion of our air and ocean freight revenues by purchasing transportation services from direct (asset-based) carriers and reselling those services to our customers. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") 91-9 "Revenue and Expense Recognition for Freight Services in Process", revenue from freight forwarding and export services is recognized at the time the freight is tendered to the direct carrier at origin, and direct expenses associated with the cost of transportation are accrued concurrently. At the time when revenue is recognized on a transportation shipment, the Company records costs related to that shipment based on the estimate of total purchased transportation costs. The estimates are based upon anticipated margins, contractual arrangements with direct carriers and other known factors. The estimates are routinely monitored and compared to actual invoiced costs. The estimates are adjusted as deemed necessary by the Company to reflect differences between the original accruals and actual costs of purchased transportation.

i) Share based Compensation

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 123R, "Share Based Payment: An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 123 and 95" ("SFAS 123R"). This statement requires that the cost resulting from all share-based payment transactions be recognized in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In addition, in March 2005 the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") released SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, "Share-Based Payment" ("SAB 107"). SAB 107 provides the SEC’s staff’s position regarding the application of SFAS 123R and certain SEC rules and regulations, and also provides the staff’s views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public companies. Generally, the approach in SFAS 123R is similar to the approach described in SFAS 123. However, SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the statement of operations based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure of fair value recognition, as prescribed under SFAS 123, is no longer an alternative. The Company adopted statement 123R in October 2005 and does not believe the impact will be significant to the Company’s overall results of operations or financial position.

j) Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share

The Company uses SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share" for calculating the basic and diluted loss per share. Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per share is computed similar to basic loss per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. At March 31, 2006 and 2005, the outstanding number of potentially dilutive common shares totaled 35,179,957 and 25,964,179 shares of common stock, including options to purchase 2,425,000 shares of common stock at March 31, 2006. There were no options outstanding at March 31, 2005. As the Company has net losses, their effect is anti-dilutive for all periods presented and has not been included in the diluted weighted average earnings per share as shown on the Statements of Operations.

NOTE 3 - ACQUISITION OF AIRGROUP

In January of 2006, the Company acquired 100 percent of the outstanding stock of Airgroup Corporation (“Airgroup”). Airgroup is a Seattle, Washington based non-asset based logistics company that provides domestic and international freight forwarding services through a network of 34 exclusive agent offices across North America. Airgroup services a diversified account base including manufacturers, distributors and retailers using a network of independent carriers and over 100 international agents positioned strategically around the world. See the Company’s Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2006 for additional information.

The transaction was valued at up to $14.0 million. This consists of: (i) $9.5 million payable in cash at closing (before giving effect for $2.8 million in acquired cash); (ii) an additional base payment of $0.6 million payable in cash on the one-year anniversary of the closing, provided at least 90% of Airgroup’s locations remain operational through the first anniversary of the closing (the “Additional Base Payment”); (iii) a subsequent cash payment of $0.5 million in cash on the two-year anniversary of the closing; (iv) a base earn-out payment of $1.9 million payable in Company common stock over a three-year earn-out period based upon Airgroup achieving income from continuing operations of not less than $2.5 million per year; and (v) as additional incentive to achieve future earnings growth, an opportunity to earn up to an additional $1.5 million payable in Company common stock at the end of a five-year earn-out period (the “Tier-2 Earn-Out”). Under Airgroup’s Tier-2 Earn-Out, the former shareholders of Airgroup are entitled to receive 50% of the cumulative income from continuing operations in excess of $15,000,000 generated during the five-year earn-out period up to a maximum of $1,500,000. With respect to the base earn-out payment of $1.9 million, in the event there is a shortfall in income from continuing operations, the earn-out payment will be reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis to the extent of the shortfall. Shortfalls may be carried over or carried back to the extent that income from continuing operations in any other payout year exceeds the $2.5 million level.

The acquisition, which provided the platform operation for the Company’s consolidation strategy, was accounted for as a purchase and accordingly, the results of operations and cash flows of Airgroup have been included in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements prospectively from the date of acquisition. At March 31, 2006 the total purchase price, including acquisition expenses of $104,030, but excluding the contingent consideration, was $10,104,030. The following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the purchase price based on the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at January 1, 2006:

Current assets	$	11,412,049
Furniture and equipment		289,333
Other assets		399,251
Goodwill and other intangibles		7,846,922
Total acquired assets		19,947,555
Current liabilities assumed		8,911,245
Long term deferred tax liability		932,280
Total acquired liabilities		9,843,525
Net assets acquired	$	10,104,030

For the three months ending March 31, 2006, the Company recorded an expense of $170,200 from amortization of intangibles and an income tax benefit of $57,868 from amortization of the long term deferred tax liability; both arising from the acquisition of Airgroup. The Company expects the net reduction in income, from the combination of amortization of intangibles and long term deferred tax liability, will be $224,664 in a year in fiscal years 2006, $403,806 in 2007, $361,257 in 2008, $394,079 in 2009, in $318,862 in 2010, and $107,052 in 2011.

The company has not yet finalized the purchase price allocation as a result of its on-going review of the tax implications of the transaction which will be completed in the allotted period of time as required per SFAS 141.

The following information for the quarters ended March 31, 2006 (actual and unaudited) and March 31, 2005 (pro forma and unaudited) is presented as if the acquisition of Airgroup had occurred on January 1, 2006 (in thousands, except earnings per share):

		Three Months ended March 31,
		2006			2005
Total revenue	$	11,843		$	12,566
Loss from continuing operations		(127	)		(7	)
Net (loss)		(27	)		(6	)
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.00		$	0.00

NOTE 4 - LONG TERM DEBT

To complete the Airgroup acquisition and ensure adequate financial flexibility, the Company secured a $10,000,000 revolving credit facility (the "Facility") in January 2006. The Facility is collateralized by our accounts receivable and other assets of the Company and our subsidiaries. Advances under the Facility are available to fund future acquisitions, capital expenditures or for other corporate purposes. Borrowings under the facility bear interest, at our option, at prime minus 1.00% or LIBOR plus 1.55% and can be adjusted up or down during the term of the Facility based on our performance relative to certain financial covenants. The facility provides for advances of up to 75% of our eligible accounts receivable.

As of March 31, 2006, we had $300,752 in advances under the Facility along with $980,318 in outstanding checks which had not yet been presented to the bank for payment. These amounts in addition to $500,000 payable to the former shareholders of Airgroup total long term debt of $1,781,070.

At March 31, 2006, based on available collateral and $208,236 in outstanding letter of credit commitments, there was $3,256,775 available for borrowing under the Facility.

NOTE 5 - PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES

Deferred income taxes are reported using the liability method. Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

The Company accumulated a net federal operating loss carryforward of $342,272 from inception though its transition into the logistics business in January of 2006 which expires in 2025. Utilization of the net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards is subject to significant limitations imposed by the change in control under I.R.C. 382, limiting its annual utilization to the value of the Company at the date of change in control times the federal discount rate. A significant portion of the NOL may expire before it can be utilized. The Company is maintaining a valuation allowance of approximately $116,000 to off-set the deferred tax asset associated with these net operating losses until when, in the opinion of management, utilization is reasonably assured.

For the thee months ended March 31, 2006, the Company recognized an income tax benefit of $57,868 related to the amortization of the deferred tax liability associated with the acquisition of Airgroup in accordance with FASB 109.

NOTE 6 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value at $.001 per share. As of March 31, 2005, none of the shares were issued or outstanding (unaudited).

Common Stock

In January 2006, we issued 1,009,093 shares of our common stock to certain Airgroup shareholders and employees who are accredited investors for gross proceeds of $444,000. In February 2006, we issued 1,466,697 shares of our common stock to a limited number of accredited investors for gross cash proceeds of $645,000. Each of these private placements was completed at a purchase price of $0.44 per share.

NOTE 7 - SHARE BASED COMPENSATION

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123R, “ Share Based Payment: An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 123 and 95 ” (“SFAS 123R”). This statement requires that the cost resulting from all share based payment transactions be recognized in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In addition, in March 2005 the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) released SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, “ Share-Based Payment ” (“SAB 107”). SAB 107 provides the SEC staff’s position regarding the application of SFAS 123R and certain SEC rules and regulations, and also provides the staff’s views regarding the valuation of share based payment arrangements for public companies. Generally, the approach in SFAS 123R is similar to the approach described in SFAS 123. However, SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the statement of operations based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure of fair value recognition, as prescribed under SFAS 123, is no longer an alternative.

The Company issued its first employee options in October of 2005 and adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAF123R concurrent with this initial grant.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2006, the Company issued employees options to purchase 425,000 shares of common stock at $0.44 per share. The options vest over a five year term.

Compensation cost recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2006 includes compensation cost for all share-based payments granted to date, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. No options have been exercised as of March 31, 2006.

The weighted average fair value of employee options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2006 was $0.35 per share. The fair value of options granted were estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the following assumptions:

	2006
Dividend yield	None
Expected volatility	117	%
Average risk free interest rate	3.73	%
Average expected lives	5.00 years

In accordance with SFAS123R, the Company is required to estimate the number of awards that are ultimately expected to vest. Due to the lack of historical information, the Company has not reduced its share based compensation costs for any estimated forfeitures. Estimated forfeitures will be reassessed in subsequent periods and may change based on new facts and circumstances.

For the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Company recognized compensation costs of $42,810, in accordance with SFAS 123R.

NOTE 8 - RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In February 2006, the FASB has issued FASB Statement No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Instruments. This standard amends the guidance in FASB Statements No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. Statement 155 allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives to be accounted for as a whole (eliminating the need to bifurcate the derivative from its host) if the holder elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. Statement 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 155 to have any impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2006, the FASB decided to move forward with the issuance of a final FSP FAS 123R-4 “Classification of Options and Similar Instruments Issued as Employee Compensation That Allow for Cash Settlement upon the Occurrence of a Contingent Event” . The guidance in FSP FAS 123R-4 amends paragraphs 32 and A229 of FASB Statement No. 123R to incorporate the concept articulated in footnote 16 of FAS 123R. That is, a cash settlement feature that can be exercised only upon the occurrence of a contingent event that is outside the employee’s control does not meet the condition in paragraphs 32 and A229 until it becomes probable that the event will occur. Originally under FAS 123R, a provision in a share-based payment plan that required an entity to settle outstanding options in cash upon the occurrence of any contingent event required classification and accounting for the share based payment as a liability. This caused an issue under certain awards that require or permit, at the holder’s election, cash settlement of the option or similar instrument upon (a) a change in control or other liquidity event of the entity or (b) death or disability of the holder. With this new FSP, these types of cash settlement features will not require liability accounting so long as the feature can be exercised only upon the occurrence of a contingent event that is outside the employee’s control (such as an initial public offering) until it becomes probable that event will occur. The guidance in this FSP shall be applied upon initial adoption of Statement 123(R). An entity that adopted Statement 123(R) prior to the issuance of the FSP shall apply the guidance in the FSP in the first reporting period beginning after February 2006. Early application of FSP FAS 123R-4 is permitted in periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. The Company does not expect that this new FSP will have any impact upon its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2005, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on Issue 05-6 , “ Determining the Amortization Period for Leasehold Improvements ”, which requires that leasehold improvements acquired in a business combination or purchased subsequent to the inception of a lease be amortized over the lesser of the useful life of the assets or a term that includes renewals that are reasonably assured at the date of the business combination or purchase. EITF 05-6 is effective for periods beginning after July 1, 2005. The Company does not expect the provisions of this consensus to have any impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No.154, “ Accounting Changes and Error Corrections ” (“SFAS 154”) which replaces Accounting Principles Board Opinions No. 20 “ Accounting Changes ” and SFAS No. 3, “ Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements - An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 28 .” SFAS 154 provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of accounting changes and error corrections. It establishes retrospective application, for the latest practicable date, as the required method for reporting a change in accounting principle and the reporting of a correction of an error. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 154 to have any impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and result of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes and other information included elsewhere in this report.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, regarding future operating performance, events, trends and plans. All statements other than statements of historical facts included or incorporated by reference in this report, including, without limitation, statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy, budgets, projected revenues, projected costs and plans and objective of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. In addition, forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” or “believes” or the negative thereof or any variation thereon or similar terminology or expressions. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations, projections and assumptions about future events. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us that, if not realized, may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. While it is impossible to identify all of the factors that may cause our actual operating performance, events, trends or plans to differ materially from those set forth in such forward-looking statements, such factors include the inherent risks associated with: (i) our belief that Airgroup will be able to serve as a platform acquisition under our business strategy; (ii) our ability to use Airgroup as a “platform” upon which we can build a profitable global transportation and supply chain management company, which itself relies upon securing significant additional funding, as to which we have no present assurances; (iii) our ability to at least maintain historical levels of transportation revenue, net transportation revenue (gross profit margins) and related operating expenses at Airgroup; (iv) competitive practices in the industries in which we compete, (v) our dependence on current management; (vi) the impact of current and future laws and governmental regulations affecting the transportation industry in general and our operations in particular; and (vii) other factors which may be identified from time to time in our Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings and other public announcements. Furthermore, the general business assumptions used for purposes of the forward-looking statements included within this report represent estimates of future events and are subject to uncertainty as to possible changes in economic, legislative, industry, and other circumstances. As a result, the identification and interpretation of data and other information and their use in developing and selecting assumptions from and among reasonable alternatives require the exercise of judgment. To the extent that the assumed events do not occur, the outcome may vary substantially from anticipated or projected results, and, accordingly, no opinion is expressed on the achievability of those forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly release the result of any revision of these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date they are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Overview

In conjunction with a change of control transaction completed during October 2005, we have recently: (i) discontinued our former business model; (ii) adopted a new business strategy focused on building a global transportation and supply chain management company; (iii) changed our name to “Radiant Logistics, Inc.” to, among other things, better align our name with our new business focus; and (iv) completed our first acquisition within the logistics industry.

We accomplished the first step in our new business strategy by completing the acquisition of Airgroup effective as of January 1, 2006. Airgroup is a Seattle-Washington based non-asset based logistics company providing domestic and international freight forwarding services through a network of 34 exclusive agent offices across North America. Airgroup services a diversified account base including manufacturers, distributors and retailers using a network of independent carriers and over 100 international agents positioned strategically around the world.

As a non-asset based provider of third-party logistics services, we seek to limit our investment in equipment, facilities and working capital through contracts and preferred provider arrangements with various transportation providers who generally provide us with favorable rates, minimum service levels, capacity assurances and priority handling status. Our non-asset based approach allows us to maintain a high level of operating flexibility and leverage a cost structure that is highly variable in nature while the volume of our flow of freight enables us to negotiate attractive pricing with our transportation providers.

Our principal source of income is derived from freight forwarding services. As a freight forwarder, we arrange for the shipment of our customers' freight from point of origin to point of destination. Generally, we quote our customers a turn key cost for the movement of their freight. Our price quote will often depend upon the customer's time-definite needs (first day through fifth day delivery), special handling needs (heavy equipment, delicate items, environmentally sensitive goods, electronic components, etc.) and the means of transport (truck, air, ocean or rail). In turn, we assume the responsibility for arranging and paying for the underlying means of transportation.

Our transportation revenue represents the total dollar value of services we sell to our customers. Our cost of transportation includes direct costs of transportation, including motor carrier, air, ocean and rail services. We act principally as the service provider to add value in the execution and procurement of these services to our customers. Our net transportation revenue (gross transportation revenue less the direct cost of transportation) is the primary indicator of our ability to source, add value and resell services provided by third parties, and is considered by management to be a key performance measure. In addition, management believes measuring its operating costs as a function of net transportation revenue provides a useful metric, as our ability to control costs as a function of net transportation revenue directly impacts operating earnings.

Our operating results will be affected as acquisitions occur. Since all acquisitions are made using the purchase method of accounting for business combinations, our financial statements will only include the results of operations and cash flows of acquired companies for periods subsequent to the date of acquisition.

Our GAAP based net income will be affected by non-cash charges relating to the amortization of customer related intangible assets and other intangible assets arising from completed acquisitions. Under applicable accounting standards, purchasers are required to allocate the total consideration in a business combination to the identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values at the time of acquisition. The excess of the consideration paid over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired is to be allocated to goodwill, which is tested at least annually for impairment. Applicable accounting standards require that we separately account for and value certain identifiable intangible assets based on the unique facts and circumstances of each acquisition. As a result of our acquisition strategy, our net income will include material non-cash charges relating to the amortization of customer related intangible assets and other intangible assets acquired in our acquisitions. Although these charges may increase as we complete more acquisitions, we believe we will be actually growing the value of our intangible assets (e.g., customer relationships). Thus, we believe that earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, is a useful financial measure for investors because it eliminates the effect of these non-cash costs and provides an important metric for our business. Further, the financial covenants of our credit facility adjust EBITDA to exclude costs related to stock option expense and other non-cash charges. Accordingly, we intend to employ EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA as a management tools to measure our historical financial performance and as a benchmark for future financial flexibility.

Our operating results are also subject to seasonal trends when measured on a quarterly basis. The impact of seasonality on our business will depend on numerous factors, including the markets in which we operate, holiday seasons, consumer demand and economic conditions. Since our revenue is largely derived from customers whose shipments are dependent upon consumer demand and just-in-time production schedules, the timing of our revenue is often beyond our control. Factors such as shifting demand for retail goods and/or manufacturing production delays could unexpectedly affect the timing of our revenue. As we increase the scale of our operations, seasonal trends in one area of our business may be offset to an extent by opposite trends in another area. We cannot accurately predict the timing of these factors, nor can we accurately estimate the impact of any particular factor, and thus we can give no assurance that historical seasonal patterns will continue in future periods.

Results of Operations

Basis of Presentation

Due to the significance of the effects on our consolidated financial statements of (1) the change in business strategy (2) recently completed equity offerings and (3) the acquisition of Airgroup, our Results of Operations is presented below in a manner that is intended to provide a more meaningful discussion of our results of operations, financial condition and current business in recognition of these developments. Accordingly, no prior period analysis has been presented for the stand alone operations of Radiant for the historic quarter ended March 31, 2005, since Radiant was inactive prior to its acquisition of Airgroup and a development stage company under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 7 and such presentation would provide no meaningful data with respect to ongoing operations. We have provided our prior period analysis using pro forma results of operations, presented as if we had acquired Airgroup as of January 1, 2005. The pro forma results reflect a consolidation of the historical results of operations of Airgroup and Radiant as adjusted to reflect the amortization of acquired intangibles. This pro forma presentation differs from the initial presentation provided in our 8-K related to the acquisition of Airgroup filed on January 18, 2006 to (1) increase our initial estimates for the amortization of acquired intangibles as a result of increased values attributable to the acquired intangibles, (2) reduce our estimate for interest expense associated with the acquisition financing because we incurred less debt than originally expected to complete the acquisition and (3) exclude the impact of anticipated contractual reductions of officers’ and related family members’ compensation at Airgroup so that any such cost reductions could be more easily identified in our comparative analysis.

The pro forma financial data are not necessarily indicative of results of operations that would have occurred had this acquisition been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented or that might be attained in the future.

For the Quarters ended March 31, 2006 (actual and unaudited) and March 31, 2005 (pro forma and unaudited)

We generated transportation revenue of $11.8 million and $12.6 million and net transportation revenue of $4.4 million and $5.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Net loss was $27,110 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to a loss of $14,330 for the three months ended March 31. 2005.

We had adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) of approximately $122,000 and $191,000 for three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

The following table provides a reconciliation of March 31, 2006 (actual and unaudited) and March 31, 2005 (pro forma and unaudited) adjusted EBITDA to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure in accordance with SEC Regulation G (in thousands):

		Three months ended March 31,						Change
		2006			2005			Amount		Percent
Net loss	$	(27	)	$	(6	)	$	(21	)	NM
Income tax expense (benefit) note 5		(102	)		(3	)		(99	)	NM
Interest expense		2			2			-		-
Depreciation and amortization		206			199			7		3.5	%

EBITDA (Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization)	$	79		$	192		$	(113	)	-58.9	%

Stock Options and other non-cash costs		43			-			43		100	%
Adjusted EBITDA	$	122		$	192		$	(70	)	-36.5	%

The following table summarizes March 31, 2006 (actual and unaudited) and March 31, 2005 (pro forma and unaudited) transportation revenue, cost of transportation and net transportation revenue (in thousands):

		Three months ended March 31,						Change
		2006			2005			Amount		Percent
Transportation revenue	$	11,843		$	12,566		$	(723	)	-5.8	%
Cost of transportation		7,480			7,330			(150	)	-2.0	%

Net transportation revenue	$	4,363		$	5,236		$	(873	)	-16.7	%
Net transportation margins		36.8	%		41.7	%

Transportation revenue was $11.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, a decrease of 5.8% over total transportation revenue of $12.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Domestic transportation revenue decreased by 15.6% to $7.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 from $8.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005. The decrease was due primarily to project services work done in 2005 which was completed in April of 2005. International transportation revenue increased by 18.4% to $4.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 from $3.6 million for the comparable prior year period, due mainly to increased air and ocean import freight volume.

Cost of transportation increased to 63.2% of transportation revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2006 from 58.3% of transportation revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2005. This increase was primarily due to increased international ocean import freight volume which historically reflects a higher cost of transportation as a percentage of sales.

Net transportation margins decreased to 36.8% of transportation revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2006 from 41.7% of transportation revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as a result of the factors described above.

The following table compares certain March 31, 2006 (actual and unaudited) and March 31, 2005 (pro forma and unaudited) condensed consolidated statement of income data as a percentage of our net transportation revenue (in thousands):

		Three months ended March 31,
		2006					2005					Change
		Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent

Net transportation revenue	$	4,363		100.0	%	$	5,236		100.0	%	$	(873	)	-0.4	%

Agent commissions		3,198		73.3	%		3,883		74.2	%		(685	)	-17.6	%
Personnel costs		639		14.6	%		832		15.9	%		(193	)	-23.2	%
Other selling, general and administrative		447		10.2	%		328		6.3	%		119		36.3	%
Depreciation and amortization		206		4.7	%		199		3.8	%		7		3.5	%

Total operating costs		4,490		102.9	%		5,243		100.1	%		(753	)	-14.4	%

Loss from operations		(127	)	-2.9	%		(7	)	-0.1	%		(120	)	NM
Other expense		(2	)	-0.1	%		(2	)	-0.1	%		0		NM

Loss before income taxes		(129	)	-.3.0	%		(9	)	-0.2	%		(120	)	NM
Income tax expense (benefit)		(102	)	-2.4	%		(3	)	-0.1	%		(99	)	NM

Net loss	$	(27	)	-.6	%	$	(6	)	-0.1	%	$	(21	)	NM

Agent commissions were $3.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, a decrease of 17.6% from $3.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Agent commissions as a percentage of net revenue decreased to 73.3% for three months ended March 31, 2006 from 74.2% for the comparable prior year period as a result of increased international ocean import freight volume at reduced margins which reduced amounts paid as commissions.

Personnel costs were $639,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006, a decrease of 23.2% from $832,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Personnel costs as a percentage of net revenue decreased to 14.6% for three months ended March 31, 2006 from 15.9% for the comparable prior year period as a result of contractual reductions in compensation paid to certain of selling shareholders of Airgroup.

Other selling, general and administrative costs were $447,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006, an increase of 36.3% from $328,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005. As a percentage of net revenue, other selling, general and administrative costs increased to 10.2% for three months ended March 31, 2006 from 6.3% for the comparable prior year period primarily as a result of transaction costs incurred by Airgroup in connection with the sale of the company to Radiant and the incremental costs associated with operating as a public company.

Depreciation and amortization costs remained relatively unchanged at approximately $200,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005. Depreciation and amortization as a percentage of net revenue remained relatively unchanged at approximately 4.7% and 3.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Loss from operations was $127,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to a loss from operations of $7,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005.

Net loss was $27,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006, compared to a net loss of $6,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Effective On January 1, 2006, we acquired 100 percent of the outstanding stock of Airgroup. The transaction was valued at up to $14.0 million. This consists of: (i) $9.5 million payable in cash at closing; (ii) an additional base payment of $0.6 million payable in cash on the one-year anniversary of the closing, provided at least 90% of Airgroup’s locations remain operational through the first anniversary of the closing (the “Additional Base Payment”); (iii) a subsequent cash payment of $0.5 million in cash on the two-year anniversary of the closing; (iv) a base earn-out payment of $1.9 million payable in Company common stock over a three-year earn-out period based upon Airgroup achieving income from continuing operations of not less than $2.5 million per year; and (v) as additional incentive to achieve future earnings growth, an opportunity to earn up to an additional $1.5 million payable in Company common stock at the end of a five-year earn-out period (the “Tier-2 Earn-Out”). Under Airgroup’s Tier-2 Earn-Out, the former shareholders of Airgroup are entitled to receive 50% of the cumulative income from continuing operations in excess of $15,000,000 generated during the five-year earn-out period up to a maximum of $1,500,000. With respect to the base earn-out payment of $1.9 million, in the event there is a shortfall in income from continuing operations, the earn-out payment will be reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis to the extent of the shortfall. Shortfalls may be carried over or carried back to the extent that income from continuing operations in any other payout year exceeds the $2.5 million level.

In preparation for, and in conjunction with, the Airgroup transaction, we secured financing proceeds through several private placements to a limited number of accredited investors as follows:

Date	Shares Sold	Gross Proceeds	Price Per Share
● October 2005	2,272,728	$ 1.0 million	$ 0.44
● December 2005	10,098,934	$ 4.4 million	$ 0.44
● January 2006	1,009,093	$ 444,000	$ 0.44
● February 2006	1,446,697	$ 645,000	$ 0.44

In January 2006, we entered into a $10.0 million secured credit facility with Bank of America, N.A with a term of two years (the “Facility”). The Facility is collateralized by our accounts receivable and other assets of the Company and our subsidiaries. Advances under the Facility are available to fund future acquisitions, capital expenditures or for other corporate purposes. Borrowings under the facility bear interest, at our option, at prime minus 1.00% or LIBOR plus 1.55% and can be adjusted up or down during the term of the Facility based on our performance relative to certain financial covenants. The facility provides for advances of up to 75% of our eligible accounts receivable.

As of April 30, 2006, we had approximately $442,000 outstanding under the Facility and we had eligible accounts receivable sufficient to support approximately $3.6 million in borrowings. The terms of our Facility are subject to certain financial and operational covenants which may limit the amount otherwise available under the Facility. The first covenant limits our funded debt to a multiple of 3.00 times our consolidated EBITDA measured on a rolling four quarter basis (or a multiple of 3.25 at a reduced advance rate of 70.0%). The second financial covenant requires that we maintain a basic fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.1 to 1.0. The third financial covenant is a minimum profitability standard that requires us not to incur a net loss before taxes, amortization of acquired intangibles and extraordinary items in any two consecutive quarterly accounting periods.

Under the terms of the Facility, we are permitted to make additional acquisitions without the lender's consent only if certain conditions are satisfied. The conditions imposed by the Facility include the following: (i) the absence of an event of default under the Facility, (ii) the company to be acquired must be in the transportation and logistics industry, (iii) the purchase price to be paid must be consistent with our historical business and acquisition model, (iv) after giving effect for the funding of the acquisition, we must have undrawn availability of at least $2.0 million under the Facility, (v) the lender must be reasonably satisfied with projected financial statements we provide covering a 12 month period following the acquisition, (vi) the acquisition documents must be provided to the lender and must be consistent with the description of the transaction provided to the lender, and (vii) the number of permitted acquisitions is limited to three per calendar year and shall not exceed $7.5 million in aggregate purchase price financed by funded debt. In the event that we are not able to satisfy the conditions of the Facility in connection with a proposed acquisition, we would have to either forego the acquisition, obtain the lender's consent or retire the Facility. This may limit or slow our ability to achieve the critical mass we may need to achieve our strategic objectives.

The following table summarizes our contingent base earn-out payments for the fiscal years indicated based on results of the prior year (in thousands)⁽¹⁾:

		Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
		2007		2008			2009			2010			2011		Total
Earn-out payments:
Cash	$	600⁽²⁾	$	500		$	--		$	--		$	--	$	1,100
Equity				633			633			634					1,900
Total earn-out Payments	$	600	$	1,133		$	633		$	634		$	--	$	3,000

Prior year earnings targets (income from continuing operations) ⁽³⁾
Total earnings targets	$	--	$	2,500		$	2,500		$	2,500		$	--	$	7,500
Earn-outs as a percentage of prior year earnings targets:
Total		--		45.3	%		25.3	%		25.3	%		--		40.0	%

(1)	During the fiscal year 2007-2011 earn-out period, there is an additional contingent obligation related to tier-two earn-outs that could be as much as $1.5 million if Airgroup generates at least $18.0 million in income from continuing operations during the period.

(2)	Payable in cash on the one-year anniversary of the closing, so long as at least 31 of Airgroup’s agent operations remain operational through the first anniversary of the closing.

(3)	Income from continuing operations as presented here identifies the uniquely defined earnings targets of Airgroup and should not be interpreted to be the consolidated income from continuing operations of the Company which would give effect for, among other things, amortization or impairment of intangible assets or various other expenses which may not be charged to Airgroup for purposes of calculating earn-outs.

Net cash used by operating activities for the three months ending March 31, 2006 was $0.3 million compared to $.01 million at March 31, 2005. The change was principally driven by a greater reduction in accounts payable than in accounts receivable.

Net cash used for investing was $7.1 million for three months ending March 31, 2006 while there was no activity for the same comparable time frame in 2005. $10.1 million was used for the acquisition of Airgroup which had a cash balance of $2.8 million at the time it was acquired by the company at January 1, 2006 and is netted against cash used for the acquisition for purposes of the consolidated statement of cash flows. See Note 3.

Net cash provided by financing activity for three months ending March 31, 2006, was $2.8 million compared to $.02 million for the same period in 2005. Financing activities in 2006 consisted of issuing 2,475,790 shares of common stock for $1.1 million - See Note 5. During January and February 2006, respectively, $0.4 million of shares were issued to certain shareholders and employees of Airgroup, while $0.7 million of the shares were issued to other accredited investors for cash. Also associated with the acquisition of Airgroup, there is $0.5 million due to Airgroup in 2007. The Company also has a credit facility which it drew down $0.3 million and used for operations.

We believe that our current working capital and anticipated cash flow from operations are adequate to fund existing operations. However, our ability to finance further acquisitions is limited by the availability of additional capital. We may, however, finance acquisitions using our common stock as all or some portion of the consideration. In the event that our common stock does not attain or maintain a sufficient market value or potential acquisition candidates are otherwise unwilling to accept our securities as part of the purchase price for the sale of their businesses, we may be required to utilize more of our cash resources, if available, in order to continue our acquisition program. If we do not have sufficient cash resources through either operations or from debt facilities, our growth could be limited unless we are able to obtain such additional capital. In this regard and in the course of executing our acquisition strategy, we expect to pursue an additional equity offering within the next twelve months.

We have used a significant amount of our available capital to finance the acquisition of Airgroup. We expect to structure acquisitions with certain amounts paid at closing, and the balance paid over a number of years in the form of earn-out installments which are payable based upon the future earnings of the acquired businesses payable in cash, stock or some combination thereof. As we execute our acquisition strategy, we will be required to make significant payments in the future if the earn-out installments under our various acquisitions become due. While we believe that a portion of any required cash payments will be generated by the acquired businesses, we may have to secure additional sources of capital to fund the remainder of any cash-based the earn-out payments as they become due. This presents us with certain business risks relative to the availability of capacity under our Facility, the availability and pricing of future fund raising, as well as the potential dilution to our stockholders to the extent the earn-outs are satisfied directly, or indirectly, from the sale of equity.

The Company’s principal source of liquidity is cash generated from operating activities. The business is subject to seasonal fluctuations and the first quarter is typically slower than the remaining quarters. The cash flows reflect the first quarter of Airgroup operating as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

Critical Accounting Policies

Accounting policies, methods and estimates are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements prepared by management and are based upon management's current judgments. Those judgments are normally based on knowledge and experience with regard to past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting policies, methods and estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ from management's current judgments. While there are a number of accounting policies, methods and estimates that affect our financial statements, the areas that are particularly significant include the assessment of the recoverability of long-lived assets, specifically goodwill, acquired intangibles, and revenue recognition.

We follow the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 142 requires an annual impairment test for goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 142, the first step of the impairment test requires that we determine the fair value of each reporting unit, and compare the fair value to the reporting unit's carrying amount. To the extent a reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an indication exists that the reporting unit's goodwill may be impaired and we must perform a second more detailed impairment assessment. The second impairment assessment involves allocating the reporting unit’s fair value to all of its recognized and unrecognized assets and liabilities in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill as of the assessment date. The implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is then compared to the carrying amount of goodwill to quantify an impairment charge as of the assessment date. In the future, we will perform our annual impairment test during our fiscal fourth quarter unless events or circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred before that time.

Acquired intangibles consist of customer related intangibles and non-compete agreements arising from our acquisitions. Customer related intangibles will be amortized using accelerated methods over approximately 5 years and non-compete agreements will be amortized using the straight line method over a 5 year period.

We follow the provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which establishes accounting standards for the impairment of long-lived assets such as property, plant and equipment and intangible assets subject to amortization. We review long-lived assets to be held-and-used for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. If the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows over the remaining useful life of a long-lived asset is less than its carrying amount, the asset is considered to be impaired. Impairment losses are measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. When fair values are not available, we estimates fair value using the expected future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risks associated with the recovery of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

As a non-asset based carrier, we do not own transportation assets. We generate the major portion of our air and ocean freight revenues by purchasing transportation services from direct (asset-based) carriers and reselling those services to our customers. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") 91-9 "Revenue and Expense Recognition for Freight Services in Process", revenue from freight forwarding and export services is recognized at the time the freight is tendered to the direct carrier at origin, and direct expenses associated with the cost of transportation are accrued concurrently. These accrued purchased transportation costs are estimates based upon anticipated margins, contractual arrangements with direct carriers and other known factors. The estimates are routinely monitored and compared to actual invoiced costs. The estimates are adjusted as deemed necessary to reflect differences between the original accruals and actual costs of purchased transportation.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

The Company’s exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the Company’s short-term cash investments and its line of credit. The Company is averse to principal loss and ensures the safety and preservation of its invested funds by limiting default risk, market risk and reinvestment risk. The Company invests its excess cash in institutional money market accounts. The Company does not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage its exposure to interest rate changes. If market interest rates were to change by 10% from the levels at March 31, 2006, the change in interest expense would have had an immaterial impact on the Company’s results of operations and cash flows.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedure

Our Chief Executive Officer/Principal Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2006. Based on that evaluation, he concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are designed to and are effective to give reasonable assurance that the information the Company must disclose in reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is properly recorded, processed, summarized, and reported as required.

Changes in internal controls

In connection with the acquisition of Airgroup and the evaluation that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting processes were expanded to address the Company’s shift from a development stage company to its current operations as a transportation and logistics services provider.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

None

Item 1A. Risk Factors

None

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

In January 2006, we issued 1,009,093 shares of our common stock to certain Airgroup shareholders and employees who are accredited investors at a purchase price of $0.44 per share for gross cash consideration of $444,000. The shares were issued in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and the safe-harbor private offering exemption provided by Rule 506 promulgated under the Securities Act, without the payment of underwriting discounts or commissions to any person.

In February 2006, we issued 1,466,697 shares of our common stock to a limited number of accredited investors at a purchase price of $0.44 per share for gross cash consideration of $646,000. The shares were issued in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and the safe-harbor private offering exemption provided by Rule 506 promulgated under the Securities Act, without the payment of underwriting discounts or commissions to any person.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None

Item 5. Other Information.

None

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit No.	Exhibit	Method of Filing
31.1	Certification by Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith
31.2	Certification by Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith
32.1	Certification by the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith
99.1	Press Release dated May 16, 2006

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.
Date: May 16, 2006		/s/ Bohn H. Crain Bohn H. Crain Chief Executive Officer

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.		Exhibit
31.1		Certification by Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2		Certification by Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1		Certification by Principal Executive Officer/Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.1		Press Release dated May 16, 2006