Time period
ending
3/31/2008
|
Standard
Pacific Corp
(SPF)
|
Russell 3000
Index
|
Relative
Return
SPF to Russell
3000 Index
|
Homebuilding
Russell
Industry
Peer Index
|
Relative
Return
SPF to Russell
Peer
Index
|
5 years
|
-60.76%
|
76.77%
|
-137.53%
|
22.20%
|
-83.0%
|
3 years
|
-86.32%
|
19.45%
|
-105.78%
|
-54.96%
|
-31.36%
|
1 year
|
-76.58%
|
-6.06%
|
-70.52%
|
-37.09%
|
-39.49%
|
|
·
|
Standard
Pacific refuses to seek shareholder approval to remove its classified
board.
|
|
·
|
Standard
Pacific refuses to seek shareholder approval to remove 80% supermajority
voting requirements in the bylaws and articles of
incorporation.
|
|
·
|
Standard
Pacific refuses to implement a majority voting standard for director
elections.
|
|
·
|
Standard
Pacific has a poison pill that is not approved by
shareowners.
|
|
·
|
Shareowners
may not remove directors without
cause.
|
|
·
|
Shareowners
may not call special meetings or act by written
consent.
|
|
·
|
Harvard
Professor Lucian Bebchuk and associates published a study in September
20041 which found that companies with
staggered boards, poison pills, supermajority voting requirements and
golden parachutes deliver less shareholder value than those companies that
do not have such measures in place. Standard Pacific currently employs
each of these value destroying anti-takeover
measures.
|
|