Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrant  þ                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨		Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨		Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ		Definitive Proxy Statement
¨		Definitive Additional Materials
¨		Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
COMMERCIAL METALS COMPANY
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ		No fee required.
¨		Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
		1)		Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
		2)		Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
		3)		Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
		4)		Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
		5)		Total fee paid:
¨		Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨		Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
		1)		Amount Previously Paid:
		2)		Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
		3)		Filing Party:
		4)		Date Filed:

 

 

 

---

Table of Contents

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held On January 25, 2013

The annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Commercial Metals Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), will be held in the Rangoon Room at Omni Mandalay Hotel at Las Colinas at 221 East Las Colinas Boulevard, Irving, Texas 75039, on January 25, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., Central Standard Time. If you are planning to attend the Annual Meeting in person, please follow the instructions as outlined on the accompanying proxy card. Directions to the Annual Meeting are included at the end of the accompanying proxy statement.

The Annual Meeting will be held to consider the following matters:

 

		(1)		the election of the three persons named in the accompanying proxy statement to serve as directors until the 2016 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are elected;
		(2)		the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2013;
		(3)		an advisory vote on executive compensation;
		(4)		the approval of the Commercial Metals Company 2013 Cash Incentive Plan;
		(5)		the approval of the Commercial Metals Company 2013 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan; and
		(6)		the transaction of such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponement of the Annual Meeting.

You are invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote your shares either by telephone, Internet or mail as described in the accompanying proxy card in order to be certain your shares are represented at the Annual Meeting. Proxies forwarded by or for banks, brokers or other fiduciaries should be returned as requested by them. The prompt return of proxies will save the expense involved in further communication.

 

Irving, Texas

December 17, 2012

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the

Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on January 25, 2013:

This Proxy Statement and the Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012

are available for viewing, printing and downloading at www.proxyvote.com.

---

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

		Page
Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Stockholders			1
Proxy Statement Summary			2
Information About the Meeting and Voting			7
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management			11
Proposal 1: Election of Directors			12
Corporate Governance; Board and Committee Matters			20
Compensation Committee Report			23
Compensation Discussion and Analysis			23
Executive Compensation			38
Non-Employee Director Compensation			53
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation			56
Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions			56
Audit Committee Report			57
Proposal 2: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			58
Proposal 3: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation			59
Proposal 4: Approval of the Commercial Metals Company 2013 Cash Incentive Plan			60
Proposal 5: Approval of the Commercial Metals Company 2013 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan			63
Equity Compensation Plans			70
General			70
Stockholder Proposals for 2014 Annual Meeting			70
Other Business			70

---

Table of Contents

COMMERCIAL METALS COMPANY

6565 North MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 800

Irving, Texas 75039

Telephone (214) 689-4300

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held On January 25, 2013

This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Commercial Metals Company (“we” or “the Company”) for use at the annual meeting of our stockholders to be held on January 25, 2013 at 10:00 a.m., Central Standard Time, in the Rangoon Room at Omni Mandalay Hotel at Las Colinas at 221 East Las Colinas Boulevard, Irving, Texas 75039 (the “Annual Meeting”), and at any and all postponements or adjournments of the Annual Meeting. The approximate date on which this proxy statement and accompanying proxy card are first being made available to stockholders is December 17, 2012. The annual report to stockholders for fiscal year 2012 has been mailed to stockholders with this proxy statement or previously, and this proxy statement should be read in conjunction with the annual report.

Shares represented by each proxy, if properly executed and returned to us prior to the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions in the accompanying proxy card, will be voted as directed, but if not otherwise specified, will be voted (i) for the election of the three directors nominated by the Board and named in this proxy statement, (ii) to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, (iii) for the approval of the advisory resolution on executive compensation, (iv) for the approval of the Commercial Metals Company 2013 Cash Incentive Plan and (v) for the approval of the Commercial Metals Company 2013 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan. A stockholder executing a proxy may revoke it at any time before it is voted by giving written notice to the Corporate Secretary of Commercial Metals Company, by subsequently executing and delivering a new proxy or by voting in person at the Annual Meeting.

Stockholders of record can simplify their voting and reduce our cost by voting their shares via telephone or the Internet. The telephone and Internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders’ identities, to allow stockholders to vote their shares and to confirm that their instructions have been properly recorded. If a stockholder’s shares are held in the name of a bank or broker, the availability of telephone and Internet voting will depend upon the voting processes of the bank or broker. Accordingly, stockholders should follow the voting instructions on the form they receive from their bank or broker.

Stockholders who elect to vote via the Internet may incur telecommunications and Internet access charges and other costs for which they are solely responsible. The Internet and telephone voting facilities for stockholders of record will close at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, on the evening before the Annual Meeting. Instructions for voting via telephone or the Internet are contained in the accompanying proxy card.

Only stockholders of record on December 7, 2012 are entitled to notice of and to attend and/or vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournments of the Annual Meeting. A complete list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for examination at our principal executive offices located at 6565 North MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 800, Irving, Texas 75039 for a period of ten days prior to the Annual Meeting. The list of stockholders will also be available for inspection at the Annual Meeting and may be inspected by any stockholder for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting. Proof of ownership of Commercial Metals Company common stock, as well as a form of personal photo identification, must be presented in order to be admitted to the Annual Meeting. If your shares are held in the name of a broker, nominee or other intermediary, you must bring proof of ownership with you to the meeting. A recent account statement, letter or proxy from your broker, nominee or other intermediary will suffice.

---

Table of Contents

 

2

---

Table of Contents

 

3

---

Table of Contents

 

4

---

Table of Contents

 

5

---

Table of Contents

 

6

---

Table of Contents

INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING AND VOTING

 

Q:	Why did you send me this proxy statement?

 

A:

We sent you this proxy statement and the enclosed proxy card because the Board is soliciting your proxy to vote at our Annual Meeting, and at any postponements or adjournments of the Annual Meeting. This proxy statement summarizes information that is intended to assist you in making an informed vote on the proposals described in this proxy statement.

 

Q:	Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

 

A:

Only stockholders of record on December 7, 2012 are entitled to notice of and to attend and/or vote at the Annual Meeting or any postponements or adjournments of the Annual Meeting. Each share of our common stock is entitled to one vote for each director to be elected and upon all other matters to be brought to a vote.

 

Q:	How can I vote my shares?

 

A:

You can vote your shares in one of two ways: either by proxy or in person at the Annual Meeting by written ballot. If you choose to vote by proxy, you may vote your shares by signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card. For your convenience, you may also vote your shares by telephone or the Internet by following the instructions on the enclosed proxy card. Each of these procedures is explained below. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, the Board recommends that you submit a proxy card in advance by telephone, Internet or mail. In this way, your shares of common stock will be voted as directed by you even if you are unable to attend the Annual Meeting.

 

Q:	May I change my vote?

 

A:	Yes. You may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised at the Annual Meeting by taking any of the following actions:

 

•

by giving written notice to the Corporate Secretary of Commercial Metals Company at 6565 North MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 800, Irving, Texas 75039;

•

by subsequently executing and delivering a new proxy; or

•

by voting in person at the Annual Meeting.

 

Q:	How many shares must be present to conduct the Annual Meeting?

 

A:

We must have a “quorum” to conduct the Annual Meeting. A quorum is a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the meeting, present in person or by proxy. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted for the purpose of determining a quorum. On December 7, 2012, the record date for determining stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, there were 116,448,898 shares of our common stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding, not including approximately 12,611,766 treasury shares. There were no shares of our preferred stock outstanding on December 7, 2012.

 

Q:	How do I vote if I cannot attend the Annual Meeting in person?

 

A:	Because many stockholders cannot attend the Annual Meeting in person, it is necessary that a large number of stockholders be represented by proxy.

By signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided or by voting your shares by telephone or via the Internet by following the instructions on the enclosed proxy card, you will enable Joseph Alvarado, Barbara R. Smith and Ann J. Bruder, each of whom is named on the proxy card as a “Proxy Holder,” to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting in the manner you indicate on your proxy card. When you vote your proxy, you can specify whether your shares should be voted for each of the nominees for director identified in Proposal 1, or you can withhold your vote on any or all of the director nominees. You can also specify how you want your shares voted with respect to Proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5, which are described elsewhere in this proxy statement.

Management of the Company is not aware of any matters other than those described in this proxy statement that may be presented for action at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting for consideration, the proxy holders will have discretion to vote for you on those matters.

 

7

---

Table of Contents

Voting by Mail.    You can vote by mail by signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided.

Voting via the Internet.    You can vote your shares via the Internet by following the instructions provided on the proxy card. The Internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate your identity and to allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your voting instructions have been properly recorded. Voting by Internet authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you had submitted a validly executed proxy card.

Voting by Telephone.    You can vote your shares by telephone by following the instructions provided on the proxy card. The telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate your identity and to allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your voting instructions have been properly recorded. Voting by telephone authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you had submitted a validly executed proxy card.

 

Q:	May I vote in person at the Annual Meeting?

 

A:

Yes, you may vote your shares at the Annual Meeting if you attend in person and use a written ballot. However, if your shares are held in the name of a broker, trust, bank or other nominee, you must bring a legal proxy or other proof from that broker, trust, bank or nominee granting you authority to vote your shares directly at the Annual Meeting. If you vote by proxy and also attend the Annual Meeting, you do not need to vote again at the Annual Meeting unless you wish to change your vote. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we strongly urge you to vote in advance by proxy by signing, dating and returning the proxy card.

 

Q:	What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?

 

A:

If your shares are registered in your name with our transfer agent, Broadridge Corporate Issuers Solutions, Inc., you are the “stockholder of record” of those shares, and this proxy statement and any accompanying documents have been provided directly to you by the Company. In contrast, if you purchased your shares through a broker or other financial intermediary, the broker or other financial intermediary will be the “stockholder of record” of those shares.

Generally, when this occurs, the broker or other financial intermediary will automatically put your shares into “street name,” which means that the broker or other financial intermediary will hold your shares in its name or another nominee’s name and not in your name, but will keep records showing you as the real or “beneficial owner.” If you hold shares beneficially in street name, this proxy statement and any accompanying documents have been forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record.

 

Q:	What are broker non-votes?

 

A:

A broker non-vote occurs when a bank, broker or other fiduciary does not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner and does not have the discretion to direct the voting of the shares. Broker non-votes are not counted as votes against a proposal or as abstentions, and will not be counted for purposes of determining the number of votes present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote with respect to a particular proposal or the number of votes cast on a particular proposal. As described below, brokers will not have discretion to vote on the election of directors, the advisory vote on executive compensation, the proposal to approve the Commercial Metals Company 2013 Cash Incentive Plan or the proposal to approve the Commercial Metals Company 2013 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan.

 

Q:	Will my shares be voted if I do not provide instructions to my broker?

 

A:

If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in a “street name” by a broker, the broker, as the record holder of the shares, is required to vote those shares in accordance with your instructions. Under applicable New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules, if you hold your shares through a bank or broker and your broker delivers this proxy statement to you, but you do not give instructions to the broker, the broker does not have the discretion to vote on the election of directors, the advisory vote on executive compensation, the proposal to approve the Commercial Metals Company 2013 Cash Incentive Plan or the proposal to approve the Commercial Metals Company 2013 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan. THEREFORE, UNLESS YOU PROVIDE VOTING INSTRUCTIONS TO THE BROKER HOLDING SHARES ON YOUR

 

8

---

Table of Contents

BEHALF, THE BROKER WILL NOT HAVE DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY TO VOTE YOUR SHARES ON ANY OF THESE PROPOSALS. We strongly encourage you to vote your proxy or provide voting instructions to the broker so that your vote on these matters will be counted.

Under NYSE rules, if you hold your shares through a bank or broker and your broker delivers this proxy statement to you, but you do not give instructions to the broker, the broker will have the discretion to vote on the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP.

 

Q:	What are the proposals and what is the required vote for each?

 

A: •

Proposal 1: Election of Directors. The Company’s second amended and restated bylaws provide for plurality voting for directors. Accordingly, this means that the three candidates receiving the highest number of FOR votes will be elected. A properly executed proxy card marked WITHHOLD with respect to the election of a director nominee will be counted for purposes of determining if there is a quorum at the Annual Meeting, but will not be considered to have been voted for or against the director nominee. An abstention or a broker non-vote on Proposal 1 will not have any effect on the election of directors and will not be counted in determining the number of votes cast.

 

•

Proposal 2: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares having voting power represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting is required to adopt Proposal 2. An abstention on Proposal 2 will have the same effect as a vote against Proposal 2. A broker non-vote will not have any effect on Proposal 2 and will not be counted.

 

•

Proposal 3: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. Proposal 3 is being submitted to enable stockholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares having voting power represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting is required to adopt Proposal 3. An abstention on Proposal 3 will have the same effect as a vote against Proposal 3. A broker non-vote will not have any effect on Proposal 3 and will not be counted. Proposal 3 is an advisory vote only, and therefore it will not bind the Company or our Board. However, the Board and the Compensation Committee will consider the voting results as appropriate when making future decisions regarding executive compensation.

 

•

Proposal 4: Approval of the Commercial Metals Company 2013 Cash Incentive Plan. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares having voting power represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting is required to adopt Proposal 4. An abstention on Proposal 4 will have the same effect as a vote against Proposal 4. A broker non-vote will not have any effect on Proposal 4 and will not be counted.

 

•

Proposal 5: Approval of the Commercial Metals Company 2013 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares having voting power represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting is required to adopt Proposal 5. An abstention on Proposal 5 will have the same effect as a vote against Proposal 5. A broker non-vote will not have any effect on Proposal 5 and will not be counted.

 

Q:	What are the recommendations of the Board of Directors?

 

A:	The Board recommends that you vote:

 

•

FOR Proposal 1 – the election of the three nominees for director nominated by the Board and named in this proxy statement;

 

•

FOR Proposal 2 – the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2013;

 

•

FOR Proposal 3 – the proposal to approve (on an advisory basis) the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers;

 

•

FOR Proposal 4 – the proposal to approve the Commercial Metals Company 2013 Cash Incentive Plan; and

 

•

FOR Proposal 5 – the proposal to approve the Commercial Metals Company 2013 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan.

 

9

---

Table of Contents

Q:	Who will count the votes?

 

A:	Votes will be counted by one or more independent inspectors of election appointed by the Company for the Annual Meeting.

 

Q:	What happens if the Annual Meeting is adjourned?

 

A:

If we adjourn the Annual Meeting, we will conduct the same business at the later meeting and the Board can decide to set a new record date for determining stockholders entitled to vote at the adjourned meeting, or decide to only allow the stockholders entitled to vote at the original meeting to vote at the adjourned meeting. According to the Company’s second amended and restated bylaws, when a meeting is adjourned to another time or place, notice need not be given of the adjourned meeting if the time and place, if any, and the means of remote communications, if any, by which stockholders and proxyholders may be deemed to be present in person and vote at such adjourned meeting are announced at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken. However, if the date of any adjourned meeting is more than 30 days after the date for which the meeting was originally scheduled to take place, notice of the place, if any, date, and time of the adjourned meeting and the means of remote communications, if any, by which stockholders and proxyholders may be deemed to be present in person and vote at such adjourned meeting must be given to each stockholder of record entitled to vote at the meeting. If after the adjournment a new record date for stockholders entitled to vote is fixed for the adjourned meeting, the Board will fix a new record date for notice of such adjourned meeting and will give notice of the adjourned meeting to each stockholder entitled to vote at such adjourned meeting as of the record date fixed for notice of such adjourned meeting.

 

Q:	Whom can I contact if I have questions?

 

A:	If you have any questions about the Annual Meeting or how to vote your shares, please call MacKenzie Partners, Inc., toll-free at (800) 322-2885 or collect at (212) 929-5500.

 

Q:	Where can I find the voting results?

 

A:	We will report the voting results in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on Form 8-K.

 

10

---

Table of Contents

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

AND MANAGEMENT

On the basis of filings with the SEC and other information, we believe that based on 116,448,898 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of December 7, 2012, the following persons, including groups of persons, beneficially owned more than five percent (5%) of our outstanding common stock:

 

Name and Address		Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership				Percent of Class
High River Limited Partnership(1)			8,689,089				7.5	%
c/o Icahn Capital LP 767 Fifth Avenue, 47 Floor New York, NY 10153
BlackRock Inc.(2)			8,219,354				7.1	%
40 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10022

 

(1)

Based on the information provided pursuant to Amendment No. 7 to Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on April 18, 2012 (the “Icahn Schedule 13D/A”) by Carl C. Icahn and certain affiliated entities of Carl C. Icahn (collectively, the “Reporting Persons”). The Reporting Persons reported that (i) High River Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership (“High River”) has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 1,737,818 shares of common stock; (ii) Icahn Partners LP (“Icahn Partners”) has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 2,705,058 shares of common stock; (iii) Icahn Partners Master Fund LP (“Icahn Master”) has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 2,830,547 shares of common stock; (iv) Icahn Partners Master Fund II LP (“Icahn Master II”) has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 982,177 shares of common stock; and (v) Icahn Partners Master Fund III LP (“Icahn Master III”) has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 433,489 shares of common stock. Carl C. Icahn, by virtue of his relationship to High River, Icahn Partners, Icahn Master, Icahn Master II and Icahn Master III, is deemed to beneficially own the shares of common stock which High River, Icahn Partners, Icahn Master, Icahn Master II and Icahn Master III directly beneficially own. According to the Icahn Schedule 13D/A, each of the Reporting Persons may have shared voting and/or dispositive power over all or some of such shares.

 

(2)

Based on the information provided pursuant to Amendment No. 2 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2012 (the “Blackrock Schedule 13G/A”) by BlackRock Inc. (“BlackRock”). BlackRock reported that it has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 8,219,354 shares of common stock. The BlackRock Schedule 13G/A states that various persons have the right to receive or the power to direct the receipt of dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of the common stock and that no one person’s interest in the common stock is more than five percent of the total outstanding common shares.

 

11

---

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth information known to us about the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each director and nominee for director, our Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”), our Chief Financial Officer (the “CFO”), the other executive officers included in the Summary Compensation Table, and all current directors and executive officers as a group based on 116,448,898 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of December 7, 2012. Unless stated otherwise in the notes to the table, each person named below has sole authority to vote and dispose of the shares listed.

 

Name		Owned Shares of Common Stock				Option Shares of Common Stock(1)				Total Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned				Percentage of Common Stock Beneficially Owned
Harold L. Adams			25,200				42,000				67,200				*
James B. Alleman			17,589				39,150				56,739				*
Joseph Alvarado			24,975				—				24,975				*
Rhys J. Best			19,000				28,000				47,000				*
Ann J. Bruder			20,590				13,000				33,590				*
Robert L. Guido			26,173				28,000				54,173				*
Richard B. Kelson			5,000				28,000				33,000				*
Anthony A. Massaro			24,000				42,000				66,000				*
Rick J. Mills			10,200				—				10,200				*
Tracy L. Porter			47,317				24,270				71,587				*
Sarah E. Raiss			9,300				14,000				23,300				*
Barbara R. Smith			10,902				—				10,902				*
J. David Smith			35,762				42,000				77,762				*
Joseph Winkler			6,234				—				6,234				*
Robert R. Womack			100,683				42,000				142,683				*
Hanns K. Zoellner			127,424				106,090				233,514				*
All current directors and executive officers as a group (20 persons)			562,315				485,654				1,047,969				0.9	%

 

*	Less than one percent

 

(1)	Represents shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of December 6, 2012.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as amended, requires directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of more than ten percent (10%) of our common stock to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and any of our other equity securities. Based solely upon our review of the copies of such forms received by us or written representations that no other forms were required from reporting persons, we believe that all such reports, except for a single Form 4 for Louis A. Federle related to accelerated restricted stock awards granted to Mr. Federle upon his permitted early retirement, were submitted on a timely basis during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012.

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our restated certificate of incorporation divides the Board into three classes. The term of office of the Class III directors expires at this Annual Meeting. On June 25, 2012, Robert R. Womack, who turned 75 on July 1, 2012, communicated with the Board and it was concluded that, in accordance with the mandatory retirement age set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, he will retire at the Annual Meeting after fourteen years of loyal and distinguished service to the Company. In addition, on June 25, 2012, the Board, pursuant to applicable provisions of the Company’s restated certificate of incorporation and second amended and restated bylaws, voted to increase the size of the Board from ten persons to eleven persons, and appointed

 

12

---

Table of Contents

Mr. Joseph Winkler to serve as a director of the Company, effective June 25, 2012. Mr. Winkler was appointed to fill the newly created vacancy as a Class II director (increasing the size of Class II from three to four directors). The seat on the Board currently held by Mr. Womack will automatically, without any further action by the Company or by the Board, be eliminated concurrently with Mr. Womack’s retirement at the Annual Meeting, and at such time the size of the Board will be automatically reduced from eleven persons to ten persons, and the number of Class I Directors will be automatically reduced from four persons to three persons.

With the announcement of Robert R. Womack’s retirement from the Board of Directors effective as of the Annual Meeting, and in connection with the Board’s succession planning, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee initiated a search process to select director candidates to replace directors who would retire in the next two years, including Mr. Womack. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee engaged Russell Reynolds Associates to facilitate a search for director candidates and took into account many factors including, but not limited to, requirements for independence; the individual’s general understanding of the various disciplines relevant to the success of our Company as a large globally-operated, publicly-traded company in today’s business environment; each candidate’s understanding of the Company’s businesses and the metals industry and markets; the individual’s professional expertise and educational background; the individual’s ethics, integrity, values, inquisitive and objective perspectives, practical wisdom, judgment and availability; and other factors that promote diversity of thought, views and experience. Candidates were evaluated by a sub-committee of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and were interviewed through a series of meetings with directors and executive management. Background reviews of each candidate were conducted by an independent professional agency specializing in the performance of such background reviews. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluated each individual in the context of the Board as a whole, with the objective of recommending the director candidate that would be the most likely of the candidate slate to best achieve the success of the business and represent stockholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment. Mr. Winkler was selected from a slate of qualified candidates for election to our Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommended Mr. Winkler to the Board, and the Board appointed Mr. Winkler as a director effective as of June 25, 2012 to fill the Class II seat added to the Board.

There are three Class III nominees standing for election at the Annual Meeting. The term of the three Class I directors ends at the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders, and the term of the four Class II directors ends at the 2015 annual meeting of stockholders. Proxies cannot be voted for the election of more than three persons to the Board at the Annual Meeting.

Each nominee named in this proxy statement has consented to being named in this proxy statement and to serve if elected. If any nominee becomes unavailable for any reason, the shares represented by the proxies will be voted for the person, if any, designated by our Board to replace such nominee. However, the Company has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unavailable. All of the director nominees, as well as the continuing directors, plan to attend this year’s Annual Meeting. At the 2012 annual meeting, all of our current directors were in attendance. The following tables set forth information about the nominees and the continuing directors.

 

13

---

Table of Contents

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

 

Name, Principal Occupation and Other Information		Age				Served as Director Since
Class III – Term to Expire in 2013
Rhys J. Best			66				2010
Engaged in private investments and Managing Partner of SEREN Holdings LTD, a Texas limited partnership primarily involved in investments
Business Experience:    Mr. Best has been engaged in private investments since June 2007. From 1999 until June 2004, Mr. Best served as Chairman of the board of directors, President and CEO of Lone Star Technologies, Inc., a company engaged in producing and marketing casing, tubing, line pipe and couplings for the oil and gas, industrial, automotive and power generation industries until its acquisition by United States Steel Corporation in June 2007, and from June 2004 to June 2007, Mr. Best served as Chairman of the board of directors and CEO of Lone Star Technologies, Inc.
Other Board Experience:    Mr. Best serves as Chairman of Crosstex Energy, L.P. and has been appointed to serve a two-year term as non-executive Chairman of Austin Industries, Inc. commencing November 29, 2012. He is a director of Trinity Industries, Inc., Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation and MRC Global, Inc.
Qualifications:    Mr. Best brings to the Board chief executive leadership and business management experience, as well as strong business acumen and financial and strategic planning expertise. His service on the boards of directors of other publicly traded companies provides our Board with a broad perspective and experience in the areas of management, operations and strategy, as well as additional perspective on the Company’s operations, including its international operations and steel manufacturing.
Richard B. Kelson			66				2010
Chairman, President and CEO of ServCo, LLC   Business Experience:    Since July 2009, Mr. Kelson has been the Chairman, President and CEO of ServCo, LLC, a strategic sourcing company. Mr. Kelson was an operating advisor of Pegasus Capital, a private equity investment firm, from September 2006 to March 2010. From 1974 to August 2006, Mr. Kelson served in a variety of capacities at Alcoa, Inc., a producer of primary aluminum, fabricated aluminum and alumina, including Chairman’s Counsel from January 2006 to August 2006 and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 1997 to December 2005.
Other Board Experience:    Mr. Kelson is a director of MeadWestvaco Corporation, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., Ecovative Design LLC and Shale-Inland, and he is a former director of Lighting Science Group Corporation.
Qualifications:    Mr. Kelson brings significant financial and business knowledge and leadership experience to our Board. His past service as an operating advisor provides the Board with valuable contributions in the areas of mergers and acquisitions, capital deployment and other major financial decisions. His service as a leader of a global integrated aluminum manufacturer provides additional perspective on the Company’s global industrial and manufacturing operations. His service on the boards of directors of other publicly traded companies provides our Board with a broad perspective and experience in the areas of management, operations and strategy.

 

14

---

Table of Contents

Name, Principal Occupation and Other Information		Age				Served as Director Since
Rick J. Mills			65				2012
Retired – Former Corporate Vice-President and President of Components Group of Cummins, Inc.
Business Experience:    Mr. Mills served as the Corporate Vice-President and President of Components Group of Cummins, Inc., a manufacturer of service engines and related technologies, from 2005 to 2008. Mr. Mills spent over 37 years with Cummins, serving in a variety of financial roles before being named Vice President and General Manager of Atlas Inc., a former Cummins business that manufactured engine components, in 1988. He then served as President of Atlas from 1990 to 1993, Vice President of the Pacific Rim and Latin America operations for Cummins Filtration (formerly Fleetguard Inc.) from 1993 to 1996, Corporate Controller of Cummins, Inc. from 1996 to 2000 and Vice-President and Group President of Filtration of Cummins, Inc. from 2000 to 2005.
Other Board Experience:    Mr. Mills is currently a director of Flowserve Corporation and is a former director of Gerdau Ameristeel and Rohm and Haas Company.
Qualifications:    Mr. Mills brings to the Board significant leadership, operational and strategic experience gained in his 37 years at Cummins, Inc. in a variety of financial, managerial and executive positions. Mr. Mills has significant international experience from his leadership roles of the Pacific Rim and Latin America operations at Cummins, which provides the Board valuable insight into the Company’s international operations and strategy. In addition, Mr. Mills’ experience as a director of an international manufacturer and an international steel producer and recycler brings valuable corporate leadership and strategy development knowledge to the Board.

 

15

---

Table of Contents

DIRECTORS CONTINUING IN OFFICE

 

Name, Principal Occupation and Other Information		Age				Served as Director Since
Class I – Term to Expire in 2014
Robert L. Guido			66				2007
Retired – Former Vice Chair and Chief Executive Officer of Ernst & Young’s Assurance and Advisory Practice   Business Experience:    During Mr. Guido’s 38-year career with Ernst & Young, most recently serving as Vice Chair and Chief Executive Officer of Ernst & Young’s Assurance and Advisory Practice, he worked with clients in many industries, from privately held companies to some of the firm’s largest global companies. In addition to client facing roles, he co-chaired the firm’s Global Client Steering Committee, which was comprised of the firm’s most senior partners who work with global clients, and served as the Vice-Chair of the audit practice and the Regional Partner in charge of human resources.   Other Board Experience:    Mr. Guido is a director of Bally Technologies, Inc. and is a director and Chairman of the Audit/Finance Committee of North Highland Consulting, a privately held company based in Atlanta, Georgia and engaged in management consulting services. Mr. Guido is serving a three-year term on the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s (“PCAOB”) Standing Advisory Group, which provides the PCAOB with input on its standard-setting process. Mr. Guido also serves on the Risk Advisory Council of the National Association of Corporate Directors.   Qualifications:    Mr. Guido brings to the Board a significant level of financial and accounting expertise, as well as extensive experience in mergers and acquisitions, which he developed throughout his 38-year career at Ernst & Young. His service at Ernst & Young as a senior advisory and engagement partner to numerous global companies provides him with an in-depth understanding of the range of issues facing global companies. Mr. Guido is experienced at engaging senior management and boards in discussions encompassing key business issues such as strategy, financing alternatives, acquisitions, restructuring and personnel matters. He also brings to the Board important knowledge of and experience with the SEC and PCAOB from his prior dealings with these agencies as a public accountant. Mr. Guido has a valuable background in corporate governance, audit committee best practices and enterprise risk management based on his experiences as a public accountant, guest lecturer and author on enterprise risk management.
Sarah E. Raiss			55				2011
Retired – Former Executive Vice President Corporate Services, TransCanada Corporation, Calgary, Alberta, Canada   Business Experience:    Ms. Raiss was employed by TransCanada Corporation, a North American energy infrastructure company, from 1999 to 2011, most recently serving as Executive Vice President, Corporate Services, from 2002 to 2011 and as Executive Vice President, Human Resources and Public Sector Relations, from 2000 to 2002. Prior to her employment with TransCanada, Ms. Raiss served in various engineering, operations, strategic planning and marketing positions in the telecommunications industry at Ameritech Corporation and its subsidiary, Michigan Bell.   Other Board Experience:    Ms. Raiss is a director of Shoppers Drug Mart, Canadian Oil Sands, Alberta Electric System Operator and Calgary Petroleum Club and she serves as Calgary Chapter Chair of the Institute of Corporate Directors (Canada). She is a former director of MicroPlanet Technologies Corporation, a TSX Venture Exchange Company, at which Ms. Raiss assisted in establishing a governance framework as it became publicly traded.   Qualifications:    Ms. Raiss brings to our Board strong business acumen and business management experience, as well as functional expertise in strategic planning, merger integration, human resources and corporate governance, all gained through her management and board experiences at significant industrial enterprises. Her service as Executive Vice President, Corporate Services

 

16

---

Table of Contents

Name, Principal Occupation and Other Information		Age				Served as Director Since
of TransCanada Corporation and director of Shoppers Drug Mart provide our Board with additional perspective on corporate strategy and opportunities for current and future operations. In addition, Ms. Raiss has received an Institute of Corporate Directors professional designation and has completed courses at Harvard on “Making Boards More Effective” and at University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business on “Creating Value Through Finance.”
J. David Smith			63				2004
Retired – Former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Euramax International, Inc.; Currently serving as non-executive Chairman of Nortek, Inc.   Business Experience:    Mr. Smith served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Euramax International, Inc., an international producer of aluminum, steel, vinyl, copper and fiberglass products for construction and transportation markets, from 1996 to 2008. In 2011, Mr. Smith served as Interim Chief Executive Officer of Nortek, Inc. Prior thereto, he served as President of Alumax Fabricated Products, Inc. from 1989 to 1996, and held numerous senior operating roles in its predecessor companies from 1972 to 1989.   Other Board Experience:    Mr. Smith serves as a director and a member of the Audit Committee of Houghton International Inc., and as Chairman and a member of the Audit and Compensation Committees of Siamons International, Inc.
Qualifications:    Mr. Smith brings to our Board managerial and operational expertise gained through his broad experience in managing and leading a significant industrial and manufacturing enterprise. His service as the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Euramax International, Inc. provides our Board with additional international and strategic perspectives. Mr. Smith’s interim leadership position at Nortek, as well as his service on Nortek’s board, have provided him with valuable management, governance and leadership experience that he brings to our Board. In addition, his service on several boards of international companies provides him with international experience and enables him to make valuable contributions to our international growth strategies.

 

Name, Principal Occupation and Other Information		Age				Served as Director Since
Class II – Term to Expire in 2015
Harold L. Adams			73				2004
Chairman Emeritus of RTKL Associates Inc.
Business Experience:    Mr. Adams serves as Chairman Emeritus of RTKL Associates Inc., a global design firm, a position he has held since April 2003. Prior thereto, he served for 36 years as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of RTKL Associates Inc.
Other Board Experience:    Mr. Adams is a director of Legg Mason, Inc., Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. and Dewberry Inc., a private engineering company.
Qualifications:    Mr. Adams has accumulated broad experience in managerial and leadership matters in over 36 years of service as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of an international architecture firm. Mr. Adams brings to the Board extensive knowledge of the construction industry, having served as Chairman of The Design-Build Institute of America and as a member of the National Academy of Construction. His service on the Board of Directors of other publicly traded companies provides our Board with additional perspective on the Company’s operations and in the areas of management, operations and strategy. In addition, Mr. Adams has served as a leader on U.S. business advisory councils with Korea and China and the Services Policy Advisory Board to the U.S. Trade Negotiator and is Chairman of the Governor’s International Advisory Council for the State of Maryland. In these roles, Mr. Adams worked in many major international markets in a myriad of economic climates and cultures.

 

17

---

Table of Contents

Name, Principal Occupation and Other Information		Age				Served as Director Since
Joseph Alvarado			60				2011
President and CEO of Commercial Metals Company   Business Experience:    Mr. Alvarado joined the Company in April 2010 as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. He was named President and Chief Operating Officer in April 2011, and in June 2011, he was appointed President and CEO effective September 1, 2011. He was appointed to our Board on September 1, 2011. Prior to joining Commercial Metals Company, Mr. Alvarado served as President and Chief Operating Officer at Dallas, Texas-based Lone Star Technologies, Inc., a company engaged in producing and marketing casing, tubing, line pipe and couplings for the oil and gas, industrial, automotive and power generation industries from 2004 through 2007. He held such positions until United States Steel Corporation, a steel manufacturer, named him President of U.S. Steel Tubular Products in June 2007 after completing its acquisition of Lone Star Technologies, Inc. and its related companies, a position he held until March 2009. Mr. Alvarado began his career in steelmaking at Inland Steel Company in 1976, serving in various capacities until he was promoted to President in 1995. Subsequently, Mr. Alvarado served as Executive Vice President-Commercial at Birmingham Steel Company from 1997 to 1998. In 1998, Mr. Alvarado joined Ispat North America Inc. as Vice President-Long Products Sales and Marketing, where he served until joining Lone Star Technologies in 2004.   Other Board Experience:    Mr. Alvarado is a director of Spectra Energy Corp.
Qualifications:    Mr. Alvarado has extensive experience in the metals, trading and manufacturing industries, which provides him with a keen understanding of the Company’s industry and customer and consumer dynamics. Mr. Alvarado’s vast experience in the steel industry has provided him with valuable knowledge of accounting, sales, manufacturing, planning and operations, all of which are relevant to his leadership of the Company and his service on the Board. His experience in domestic and global, integrated and minimill, and flat and long products further qualify him to lead the Company and serve on our Board. His service as our President and CEO as well as a director provides the Board with significant perspective on our global operations. His in-depth knowledge of the Company’s strategic priorities and operations enable him to provide valuable contributions and facilitate effective communication between management and the Board. His role as President and CEO also enables him to provide important contributions to strengthening the Company’s leadership, operations, strategy, growth and long-range plans.
Anthony A. Massaro			68				1999
Retired – Former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.   Business Experience:    Mr. Massaro served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc., a manufacturer of welding and cutting equipment, from 1996 to January 2005, and as Chairman from May 1997 to October 2005. Prior to becoming Chief Executive Officer of Lincoln Electric, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer and also as President of both Lincoln Europe and Lincoln International. Prior to joining Lincoln Electric in 1993, Mr. Massaro served as a Group President of Westinghouse Electric Corporation, which he joined in 1967. Prior to his service as a Group President, he served as Westinghouse’s Executive Vice President for the Industrials and Environmental Group and held a series of engineering and management positions in Westinghouse’s nuclear, international and automation divisions.   Other Board Experience:    Mr. Massaro serves as a director of PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and USG Energy. He is a former director of Thomas Industries.

 

18

---

Table of Contents

Name, Principal Occupation and Other Information		Age				Served as Director Since
Qualifications:    Mr. Massaro has broad experience in leading a significant industrial enterprise, particularly with respect to international operations and business management. His service as the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. provides the Board with strong global business acumen and financial and strategic planning expertise. His strong international background provides our Board with additional perspective on corporate strategy and opportunities for current and future international operations. In addition, his public company directorship service provides our Board with experience in the areas of management, operations and strategy and provides additional perspective on the Company’s operations.
Joseph Winkler			61				2012
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Complete Production Services, Inc.   Business Experience:    Mr. Winkler served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Complete Production Services, Inc., an oilfield services provider, from March 2007 to February 2012. Prior thereto, Mr. Winkler served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Complete Production Services, Inc. from March 2005 to March 2007. Prior to joining Complete Production Services, Inc., Mr. Winkler was an executive for National Oilwell Varco and several of its predecessor entities from April 1996 to March 2005.   Other Board Experience:    Director of Dresser-Rand (DRC), Hi-Crush Partners LP and Petroleum Equipment Suppliers Association.   Qualifications:    Mr. Winkler brings to the Board significant leadership, operational and strategic experience gained from his service as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Complete Production Services, Inc. and his executive experience at National Oilwell Varco and its predecessors. His public-company board of directors service provides our Board with valuable corporate leadership, governance and strategy development knowledge.

There is no family relationship between any of the directors, executive officers, or any nominee for director.

Vote Required

Directors are elected by plurality vote, and cumulative voting is not permitted.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the election of the nominees for director named above: Rhys J. Best, Richard B. Kelson, and Rick J. Mills.

 

19

---

Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; BOARD AND COMMITTEE MATTERS

Director Independence.    Our Board of Directors has determined, after considering all the relevant facts and circumstances, that Ms. Raiss and Messrs. Adams, Best, Guido, Kelson, Massaro, Mills, Smith and Winkler are independent, as “independence” is defined by the listing standards of the NYSE, because they have no direct or indirect material relationship with us (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us) that would cause the independence requirements of the NYSE listing standards to not be satisfied.

Board Leadership Structure.    Currently, Mr. Massaro serves as the Chairman of the Board and Mr. Alvarado is the President and CEO. Effective January 1, 2013, the Board has appointed Mr. Alvarado to serve as Chairman of the Board and Mr. Massaro to serve as Lead Director. In appointing Mr. Alvarado as Chairman of the Board, the independent directors have concluded that the most effective leadership structure for the Company at the present time is for Mr. Alvarado to serve as both CEO and as Chairman of the Board. The Board made this determination in light of Mr. Alvarado’s service to the Company and his leadership during the Company’s significant financial improvement. His myriad of experience within the Company’s industry afford him a broad and uniquely well-informed perspective on the Company’s business, as well as substantial insight into the trends and opportunities that can affect the Company’s future. As discussed further below, the Lead Director is responsible for providing leadership to the Board when circumstances arise in which the joint role of the Chairman and CEO may have been, or may have been perceived to be, in conflict and chairing those Board sessions that are attended only by independent directors. The Company believes Mr. Alvarado holding the joint role of Chairman and CEO is an appropriate structure as it promotes unified leadership and direction for the Company, allowing for a single, clear focus for management to execute the Company’s strategy and business plans. The combination of the Chairman and CEO roles is balanced by the appointment of Mr. Massaro as Lead Director, as well as the high majority of the Board being comprised of independent directors. Additionally, the Board believes that having a Lead Director as part of its leadership structure promotes greater management accountability and ensures that directors have an independent contact on matters of concern to them.

Lead Director.    When considered appropriate, our corporate governance guidelines permit the designation of a Lead Director for a two-year term by the majority vote of independent directors. As discussed above, the Board has appointed Mr. Massaro as Lead Director effective as of January 1, 2013. The responsibilities of the Lead Director include (i) convening and presiding over executive sessions attended only by independent or independent and non-employee directors, (ii) communicating to the CEO the substance of discussions held during those sessions to the extent requested by the participants, (iii) serving as a liaison between the Chairman of the Board and the Board’s independent directors on sensitive issues, (iv) consulting with the Chairman of the Board on meeting schedules and agendas in order to assure that sufficient time is available for discussion of agenda items, (v) consulting with the Chairman of the Board regarding materials to be sent to the Board, including the format and adequacy of information, (vi) consulting with the Chairman of the Board to assure the effectiveness of the Board meeting process and (vii) presiding at meetings of the Board in the event of the Chairman of the Board’s unavailability. The Lead Director is also available to receive direct communications from stockholders through Board approved procedures and may periodically, as directed by the Board, be asked to speak for the Company or perform other responsibilities.

Board Role in Risk Oversight.    Management has responsibility for managing overall risk to the enterprise. Our Board assesses the enterprise-level risks that face the Company from a strategic point of view and reviews options for risk mitigation. The responsibility to review and assess such risk exposure includes reviewing regulatory, safety, environmental and financial matters, contingent liabilities, and other risks which may be material to the Company, as well as the activities of management in identifying, assessing and mitigating against business, commercial, regulatory, operational, financial and other risks associated with the Company’s products and services. The President and CEO periodically reports to the Board on his and management’s assessment of risks impacting the Company. The Audit Committee, discussed below, has the responsibility to review the Company’s major financial reporting risks or exposures and to assess the steps taken by management to monitor and control such risks and exposures. The Audit Committee’s review of these risks and exposures include, but are not limited to: (i) insurance; (ii) any special-purpose entities, complex financing transactions and related off-balance sheet accounting matters; and (iii) legal matters that may significantly impact the Company’s

 

20

---

Table of Contents

financial statements or risk management. In addition, the Finance Committee provides ongoing guidance and oversight of transactions involving financing, investments, and merger and acquisition activity. Both of these committees provide the Compensation Committee with a perspective on the relationship between compensation and risk, which the Compensation Committee uses in its evaluation of management compensation in order to ensure management’s continued focus on growth in shareholder value without incentivizing undue risk.

Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Ethics.    Our Board has adopted corporate governance guidelines. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines reflect the principles by which we operate. From time to time, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board review and revise our Corporate Governance Guidelines in response to regulatory requirements and evolving best practices. We have also adopted a Code of Conduct and Business Ethics (the “Code of Conduct”), which applies to all of our directors, officers and employees. In addition, we have adopted a separate Financial Code of Ethics which is applicable to our CEO, CFO, Corporate Controller and any other officer who may function as a Chief Accounting Officer. We intend to post any amendments to or waivers from our Financial Code of Ethics and our Code of Conduct on our website to the extent applicable to our CEO, CFO, Corporate Controller, and any other officer who may function as a Chief Accounting Officer or a director. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Code of Conduct, the Financial Code of Ethics and other information are available at our website, www.cmc.com, and such information is available in print to any stockholder without charge, upon request to Commercial Metals Company, 6565 North MacArthur Blvd., Suite 800, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Corporate Secretary, or by calling (214) 689-4300.

Stockholder Communications.    Interested parties may communicate with the non-executive Chairman of the Board or, from and following January 1, 2013, the Lead Director, or any of the non-employee and independent directors by submitting a letter addressed to their individual attention or to the attention of non-employee directors c/o Corporate Secretary at P.O. Box 1046, Dallas, Texas 75221.

Meetings of the Board.    During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012, the entire Board met sixteen times, of which six were regularly scheduled meetings and ten were special meetings. All directors attended at least seventy-five percent (75%) or more of the meetings of the Board and of the committees on which they served. We expect all directors and nominees to attend the Annual Meeting. All directors attended the 2012 annual meeting.

Executive Sessions.    As required by the NYSE listing standards, non-employee and independent directors regularly schedule executive sessions in which they meet without the presence of employee directors or management. The presiding director at such executive sessions is the non-executive Chairman of the Board or, from and following January 1, 2013, the Lead Director. In fiscal year 2012, all of the non-employee directors, which includes all members of the Board other than Mr. Alvarado, held six non-employee director sessions in connection with each Board of Directors meeting and one stand-alone meeting.

Board Committees

We have four standing board committees: Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Finance. Membership of each of these committees is comprised entirely of independent directors. The Board has adopted charters for each of these committees describing the authority and responsibilities delegated to each committee by the Board. All committee charters are available at our website, www.cmc.com, and available in print to any stockholder without charge, upon request to Commercial Metals Company, 6565 North MacArthur Blvd., Suite 800, Irving, Texas 75039, Attention: Corporate Secretary, or by calling (214) 689-4300.

Audit Committee.    The Board has a standing Audit Committee that performs the activities more fully described in the Audit Committee Report on page 57. At the beginning of fiscal year 2012, the members of the Audit Committee were Messrs. Guido (Chairman), Adams, Massaro, Neary, Smith and Ms. Raiss. Effective November 7, 2011, the members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Adams, Guido, Massaro, and Womack and effective January 1, 2012, Mr. Mills was appointed to the Audit Committee. Mr. Guido remains the Chairman of the Audit Committee. During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012, the Audit Committee met seven times.

Compensation Committee.    The Board has a standing Compensation Committee that is responsible for the matters described in the Compensation Committee’s charter, including (i) annually reviewing and approving

 

21

---

Table of Contents

corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the CEO and the other executive officers, (ii) evaluating the performance of the CEO and the other executive officers in light of those goals and objectives and (iii) determining and approving the CEO’s compensation based on this evaluation as well as setting the compensation of the other executive officers following a review with the CEO of the CEO’s evaluation, recommendations and decisions as to the performance and compensation of the other executive officers. Additional responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are (i) to assist the Board in the discharge of its responsibilities relating to the establishment, administration and monitoring of fair and competitive compensation and benefits programs for our executive officers and other executives, (ii) to make recommendations to the Board with respect to incentive compensation plans, equity based plans and other compensation and benefits programs that are subject to Board approval, (iii) to administer the Company’s incentive compensation, stock option and other equity based plans, including approving option guidelines and grants, making, modifying, substituting or canceling grants, designating participants, interpreting the plans and programs, determining plan and program rule and regulations, and imposing limitations, restrictions and conditions upon any award, (iv) to review and make recommendations to the Board regarding any employment, severance, change in control or separation agreement, or any deferred compensation arrangement, to be entered into with any executive officer, (v) to review and discuss with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) included in the proxy statement and, based on such review and discussion, recommend to the Board that such CD&A be included in the annual report on Form 10-K and the proxy statement, (vi) to prepare the Compensation Committee Report for inclusion in the proxy statement, (vii) to conduct a Compensation Committee self-assessment annually and (viii) to annually review the Compensation Committee’s charter. At the beginning of fiscal year 2012, the members of the Compensation Committee were Messrs. Smith (Chairman), Best, Guido, Kelson, Massaro and Womack. Effective November 7, 2011, the members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Smith, Best, Kelson, and Ms. Raiss. Mr. Smith remains the Chairman of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee met eleven times during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012. For a further discussion of the Compensation Committee’s role in executive officer compensation, the role of executive officers in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive compensation and the Compensation Committee’s engagement and use of independent third-party compensation consultants, please see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.    The Board has a standing Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee that is responsible for the matters described in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s charter including, (i) identifying and making recommendations as to individuals qualified to be nominated for election to the Board and Board committees, (ii) monitoring developments in corporate governance matters and overseeing compliance with statutes, rules and regulations relating thereto, including reviewing, assessing and making recommendations to the Board with respect to our corporate governance guidelines, (iii) overseeing and recommending compensation of non-employee directors, (iv) overseeing the annual self-evaluation of the performance of the Board and management, (v) reviewing management succession planning, including reviewing and considering candidates for executive officer succession, and (vi) other corporate governance matters. At the beginning of fiscal year 2012, the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee were Messrs. Kelson (Chairman), Adams, Best, Guido, Massaro, Neary, Smith, Womack and Ms. Raiss. Effective November 7, 2011, the members of the Compensation Committee are Ms. Raiss and Messrs. Guido, Kelson and Massaro. Mr. Kelson remains the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met six times during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012.

Finance Committee.    The Board has established a standing Finance Committee that is responsible for the matters described in the Finance Committee’s charter, including reviewing and making recommendations to the Board with respect to (i) potential strategic transactions including mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures and other investments and proposed major capital expenditures along with reviewing the performance of the forgoing, (ii) our cash position, capital structure and strategies, financing strategies, debt arrangements and insurance coverage matters, (iii) our dividend policy, stock splits and stock repurchases and debt arrangements, (iv) the issuances, as appropriate, of debt or equity securities and (v) the adequacy of the funding of our funded retirement plans and welfare benefits plans (other than those plans maintained pursuant to a collective agreement that names a joint administrative board as the governing plan fiduciary) in terms of our corporate purposes and

 

22

---

Table of Contents

objectives. The Finance Committee also conducts annually an evaluation of its own performance and, in light of this, considers changes in the membership, charter or procedures of the committee. At the beginning of fiscal year 2012, the members of the Finance Committee were Messrs. Adams, Best (Chairman), Kelson, Neary and Womack. Effective November 7, 2011, the members of the Finance Committee are Messrs. Adams, Best, Smith and Womack, and effective June 25, 2012, Mr. Winkler was appointed to the Finance Committee. Mr. Best remains the Chairman of the Finance Committee. The Finance Committee met four times during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012.

Selection of Nominees for Election to the Board.    The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has established a process for identifying and evaluating nominees for directors. Directors should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, and be committed to representing the long-term interests of stockholders. Director candidates must also have an inquisitive and objective perspective, practical wisdom and mature judgment. In addition to considering these qualifications, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider such relevant factors as it deems appropriate, including the current composition of our Board, the evaluations of other prospective nominees, and the need for any required expertise on our Board or one of its committees. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also contemplates multiple dynamics that promote and advance diversity among the members of our Board. Although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a formal diversity policy, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers a number of factors regarding diversity of personal and professional backgrounds (both domestic and international), national origins, specialized skills and acumen, and breadth of experience in industry, manufacturing, financing transactions, and business combinations. Dedication of sufficient time, energy and attention to insure diligent and effective performance of their duties is expected of directors. Directors should be committed to serve on our Board for an extended period of time, if elected by stockholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders on the same basis that it evaluates other nominees for director. In order for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to consider persons recommended by stockholders for inclusion as nominees for election to our Board, stockholders should submit the names, biographical data and qualifications of such persons in writing in a timely manner addressed to the attention of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and delivered to the Corporate Secretary of Commercial Metals Company at P.O. Box 1046, Dallas, Texas 75221. A stockholder wishing to formally nominate a director for election at a stockholder meeting must comply with the provisions in the Company’s second amended and restated bylaws addressing stockholder nominations of directors.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee of the Board has reviewed and discussed the following section of this proxy statement entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” with management. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board that this Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012.

J. David Smith (Chairman)

Rhys J. Best

Richard B. Kelson

Sarah E. Raiss

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Executive Summary

The Company manufactures, recycles and markets steel and metal products, related materials and services through a network including steel minimills, steel fabrication and processing plants, construction-related product warehouses, a copper tube minimill, metal recycling facilities and marketing and distribution offices in the United States and in strategic international markets. The CMC Americas Division operates utilizing three

 

23

---

Table of Contents

segments: Americas Recycling, Americas Mills and Americas Fabrication. The CMC International Division operates utilizing two segments: International Mill (comprised of all mill, recycling and fabrication operations located outside of the U.S.) and International Marketing and Distribution (which includes all marketing and distribution operations located outside the U.S. as well as two U.S.-based trading and distribution divisions, CMC Cometals, located in Fort Lee, New Jersey and CMC Cometals – Steel, located in Irving, Texas).

In order to compete effectively in the steel and metal products industry, it is critical that we attract and retain motivated leaders who can best position the Company to deliver financial and operational results for the benefit of our stockholders. We believe that we achieve this objective through our executive compensation program, which is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”).

The Committee, with the assistance of its independent compensation consultant, engages in an ongoing review of the Company’s executive compensation program to ensure that it supports the Company’s compensation policy and ultimately serves the best interests of our stockholders. Following are highlights of the Company’s corporate governance framework, which the Committee believes reinforces our pay for performance environment:

 

•

No Tax Gross-Ups Under Executive Employment Continuity Agreements.    The Company does not provide for excise tax gross-ups under the Executive Employment Continuity Agreements. Under these agreements, if we determine that the payments to an executive under the Company’s change in control agreement, combined with any other payments or benefits to which the executive may be entitled, would result in the imposition on the executive of an excise tax, we are required to either (i) reduce such payments to the maximum amount which would not result in imposition of an excise tax or (ii) make such payments to the executive if, even after the executive’s payment of the excise tax, the executive would receive a larger net amount.

 

•

Double Trigger Required for Receipt of Cash Severance Payments.    The Company’s change in control agreements contain a “double trigger” in that there must be present both a change in control and a qualifying termination of the executive in order to trigger cash severance payments under these agreements. We believe that these agreements provide a mechanism for eliminating the distraction to the executives that is inherent in change in control events.

 

•

Stock Ownership Guidelines.    To align the interests of our executives and directors with those of our stockholders and to assure that our executives and directors own meaningful levels of Company stock throughout their tenures with the Company, the Committee established stock ownership guidelines for our executives and directors. The stock ownership guidelines require the non-employee directors and President and CEO to own Company stock equal in value to five times such person’s annual cash retainer or base salary, as applicable, and each of our other named executive officers to own Company stock equal in value to three times his or her respective base salary.

 

•

Benchmarking Process Used for Compensation Determinations.    The Committee reviews external market data prepared by the Committee’s external compensation consultant, in order to set market-based compensation levels and consider current best practices when making compensation decisions.

 

•

Metrics based on Company and Individual Performance.    Bonuses paid under the Annual Cash Incentive Bonus as well as the settlement of performance-based equity awards is determined based on pre-establish Company-wide performance goals and, in the cash of the Annual Cash Incentive Bonus program, business-unit performance goals. The Committee includes an annual discretionary incentive bonus component in the Company’s executive compensation program to reward individual performance not reflected in the formulaic metrics established under the Annual Cash Incentive Bonus and Long-Term Incentive programs.

As noted above, in its compensation review process, the Committee considers whether the Company’s executive compensation and benefits program serves the best interests of the Company’s stockholders. In that respect, as part of its on-going review of the Company’s executive compensation program, the Committee considered the affirmative stockholder “say on pay” vote at the Company’s prior annual meeting of stockholders and determined that the Company’s executive compensation objectives and compensation elements continued to be appropriate. While the Committee did not make any specific changes to the Company’s executive

 

24

---

Table of Contents

compensation program in response to the “say on pay” vote, as part of the Committee’s compensation review process, in fiscal year 2013 the Committee instituted several design changes to the Company’s executive compensation program. For a discussion of such changes, please see “Evolving Structure of Executive Compensation Programs for Fiscal Year 2013” on page 36.

In fiscal year 2012, the Company achieved a significant improvement in its results despite a challenging environment for the metals industry as a whole. Notably, the Company substantially improved its adjusted EBITDA year over year. While none of the named executive officers received payments under the long-term incentive program that concluded in fiscal year 2012, the Committee approved annual bonuses for each named executive officer pursuant to the performance formula established under the Company’s Annual Cash Incentive Bonus program. In addition, each of our named executive officers other than Mr. Zoellner received discretionary bonuses with respect to their strong operational performance in fiscal year 2012. As discussed below, Mr. Zoellner ceased serving as an executive officer during fiscal year 2012 and will receive severance and certain other retirement payments in connection with his retirement.

Executive Compensation Participants

The Company’s executive compensation program applies to approximately 220 senior executives and senior managers; however, per the SEC executive compensation disclosure rules, this CD&A focuses on the compensation paid or awarded to the six named executive officers included in the Summary Compensation Table on page 38.

For fiscal year 2012, the named executive officers (the “NEOs”) were:

 

•

Mr. Alvarado, President and CEO

 

•

Ms. Smith, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

•

Mr. Zoellner, Executive Advisor to the CEO (July 2, 2012 to present); former Executive Vice President of Commercial Metals Company & President – CMC International Division (through July 1, 2012)

 

•

Mr. Porter, Senior Vice President of Commercial Metals Company & President – CMC Americas Division

 

•

Ms. Bruder, Senior Vice President of Law, Government Affairs & Global Compliance, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary

 

•

Mr. Alleman, Senior Vice President of Human Resources and Organizational Development

Compensation Objectives and Principles

The Committee oversees the compensation and benefit programs of our executives. The Committee is responsible for ensuring that our compensation policies and practices support the successful recruitment, development, and retention of the executive talent and leadership required to achieve our business objectives. The Committee is made up entirely of independent directors, consistent with the current listing standards of the NYSE.

The Committee believes that it is in the best interests of stockholders for us to establish and maintain a competitive executive compensation program. For fiscal year 2012, our base salary philosophy consisted of maintaining competitive base salaries which were targeted at approximately the 40^th percentile of competitive market data, as discussed below. A significant portion of potential executive compensation is based upon our financial performance, which we believe aligns executive performance goals with those of our stockholders. We will pay higher compensation when financial goals are exceeded than when such goals are not met, taking into consideration individual ability to influence results and overall economic and market conditions.

The Committee has approved an executive compensation program that:

 

•

facilitates the attraction and retention of top-caliber talent;

 

•

aligns the mid range interests of our executives with those of our stockholders; and

 

•

offers average base salaries and competitive employee benefits coupled with meaningful short and long-term “variable” incentives dependent upon achieving financial performance goals.

 

25

---

Table of Contents

Within the objectives listed above, the Committee generally believes that best practices call for the performance metrics by which “variable” compensation is determined to be:

 

•

primarily formulaic;

 

•

designed to compensate based upon a combination of individual, business unit and Company performance goals; and

 

•

established and communicated early in the performance period in order to align individual performance with Company goals.

In addition, the Committee strongly believes that a portion of our executive compensation program must remain discretionary. Discretionary compensation allows the Committee (i) to evaluate and reward executive performance in areas such as employee development and training, leadership and succession planning, (ii) to perform a qualitative assessment of the business and competitive conditions in which we operate, and (iii) to consider issues of internal pay equity and external benchmarking.

Determination of Total Compensation

The Committee engages an external compensation consultant to assist it in an ongoing review of the Company’s executive compensation program. The review includes an analysis of market compensation practices and developments, external regulatory requirements, the competitive market for executive talent, the evolving culture and demands of the business, our compensation philosophy, and the features of the program. The Committee periodically adjusts the various compensation elements, and did so at the start of fiscal year 2013, to further align the performance goals applicable to our executives with those of our stockholders as well as with the requirements of our business and regulatory environment.

External Compensation Advisors

In July 2012, the Committee engaged Hay Group on an ongoing basis to consult on executive compensation matters. Prior to the engagement of Hay Group, Ernst & Young LLP served as the Committee’s independent compensation consultant. All work performed by the independent compensation consultant with regard to our executive compensation program is tasked and overseen directly by the Committee. At the direction of the Committee, our management provides information and analyses to the Committee. As discussed further below, the Company participates in and purchases various compensation surveys and studies that management and the Committee use to analyze executive compensation. The Committee believes that utilizing information from multiple external consulting firms and compensation surveys ensures an objective and well-rounded view of executive compensation practices.

In fiscal year 2012, we paid Hay Group and Ernst & Young LLP approximately $42,551 and $422,473, respectively, for services provided to the Committee relating to executive and director compensation. While serving as the Committee’s independent compensation consultant, Ernst & Young LLP also provided various financial and tax-related services to the Company, resulting in the payment of $73,590 in fees for such services, all of which were pre-approved by the Committee. While the Committee believes that adequate safeguards exist to ensure the continued independence and objectivity of its independent compensation consultant, in its analysis of available compensation consultants the Committee considered management’s advice that it would need to retain Ernst & Young LLP in the future for financial and tax-related services at levels which were the same or greater than those in fiscal year 2012 and elected to retain Hay Group as the Committee’s independent compensation consultant. Hay Group does not provide any other services to the Company.

Role of Management and CEO in Compensation Decisions

We strongly believe in aligning executive and stockholder interests through an executive compensation program designed with input from management in an ongoing dialogue with the Committee and, as appropriate, the compensation advisors listed above regarding internal, external, cultural, business and motivational challenges and opportunities facing us and our executives. To that end, the executive team analyzes, with assistance from the Committee and management’s compensation advisors, trends and recommends improvements

 

26

---

Table of Contents

to the compensation programs. Specifically, Mr. Massaro, the Chairman of the Board, and Mr. Alvarado, President and CEO, reviewed with the Committee their recommendations (without any recommendation as to Mr. Alvarado’s own compensation) regarding base salary adjustments, annual bonus, long-term bonus and equity awards for the NEOs to ensure alignment of stockholder interests with executive goals as well as reward for performance. While the Committee receives management’s input with respect to executive compensation, all decisions regarding compensation for the NEOs are made by the Committee.

As periodically invited by the Committee, the following executives have attended meetings or portions of meetings of the Committee in fiscal year 2012: Mr. Alvarado, President and CEO; Ms. Smith, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Ms. Bruder, Senior Vice President of Law, Government Affairs and Global Compliance, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary; and Mr. Alleman, Senior Vice President of Human Resources and Organizational Development, as well as employees of Ernst & Young and Hay Group.

Competitiveness of Our Compensation Program

Our executive compensation program is designed so that total short and long-term compensation is competitive with market practices. Market practices, or benchmarks, are based on Peer Group data and compensation survey data. Peer Group data is used to evaluate the compensation paid or awarded to Mr. Alvarado, while compensation survey data also is used to evaluate compensation paid or awarded to the other NEOs.

Annually, the Committee selects for the Peer Group those companies it considers to be the most comparable with emphasis on their industry focus, size, scope, and complexity of operations. The Peer Group does not vary significantly from one year to the next to ensure a stable basis of comparison. For example, the Peer Group used for determining fiscal year 2012 compensation was the same as the Peer Group used for determining fiscal year 2011 compensation.

For fiscal year 2012, the Peer Group consisted of the following companies:

 

•

AK Steel Holding Corporation

 

•

Allegheny Technologies Incorporated

 

•

Mueller Industries, Inc.

 

•

Nucor Corporation

 

•

Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

 

•

Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc.

 

•

Steel Dynamics, Inc.

 

•

The Timken Company

 

•

United States Steel Corporation

 

•

Worthington Industries

As noted above, the Committee also uses compensation survey data in its evaluation of executive pay for the NEOs other than Mr. Alvarado. Survey data provides insight into positions that may not generally be reported in proxy statements and information about the compensation of executives of non-public companies. To assist the Committee in evaluating fiscal year 2012 compensation levels, the Committee reviewed information from the following surveys: Economic Research Institute 2012 Executive Compensation Assessor; Mercer Human Resource Consulting 2011 Executive Survey Report; and Towers Watson 2011/2012 Industry Report on Top Management. For purposes of this CD&A, the Peer Group data and compensation survey data are collectively referred to as “Peer Data.”

 

27

---

Table of Contents

Compensation Decisions During Fiscal Year 2012

In fiscal year 2012, the following compensation actions were taken:

 

•

Annual Cash Incentive Bonus (as defined below) was paid at 83% of target for NEOs holding Company-wide positions and 56% and 120% of target for Mr. Zoellner and Mr. Porter, respectively, based on both Company-wide and business unit performance;

 

•

no Long-Term Cash Incentive (as defined below) payments were made to the NEOs for the performance period ending in fiscal year 2012;

 

•

each of the NEOs, other than Mr. Zoellner, received discretionary annual bonuses in recognition of their significant efforts and contributions to the Company in fiscal year 2012;

 

•

the NEOs were granted a combination of stock appreciation rights and performance-based and time-vested restricted stock units, with vesting of the performance-based stock units being determined based on cumulative three-year EBITDA and ROIC targets (each as defined below), subject to the Committee’s exercise of negative discretion based on the Company’s ranking in total stockholder return as compared to the members of the Peer Group;

 

•

Mr. Alvarado received supplemental equity grants in connection with his appointment to the position of President and CEO, and Ms. Smith received a supplemental equity grant in connection with her commencement of employment with the Company;

 

•

the NEOs received salary and/or promotional increases;

 

•

the Company entered into a retirement and transition agreement with Mr. Zoellner in connection with Mr. Zoellner’s transition from the role of an officer of the Company and eventual retirement from the Company, which included, among other benefits, a retirement bonus of $300,000, severance benefits and the accelerated vesting of certain outstanding equity awards held by Mr. Zoellner; and

 

•

the Committee undertook an evaluation of the Company’s overall compensation program which resulted in numerous changes to the Company’s compensation design for fiscal year 2013 (as described on page 36) as well as a change in the Committee’s independent compensation consultant from Ernst & Young LLP to Hay Group.

Compensation Mix: Components and Objectives of Short- and Long-Term Compensation

In accordance with our overall compensation philosophy and program, executives are provided with a mix of base salary, short-term incentives, long-term incentives, employee benefits and health and welfare benefits. Our compensation philosophy places a greater portion of the potential compensation for each NEO “at risk” such that compensation will vary based on performance. “Variable” compensation is a component of compensation for most of our employees, but it is reflected in greater proportion in the NEO compensation. The table on the following pages describes each element of compensation and the objectives for each element:

 

PROGRAM		DESCRIPTION		OBJECTIVES
ANNUAL COMPENSATION:
Base Salary		• Annual cash compensation.		• Retention. • Recognition of individual performance.
Annual Cash Incentive Bonus		• Bonus plan based on performance periods set by the Committee typically utilizing formula-driven target awards based upon performance goals. • Bonus payout for formulaic bonus features may be reduced below (but not increased above) formula results at the discretion of the Committee.		• Focus executives on achieving pre-established performance goals, such as return on invested capital or net assets, operating profit, net earnings or working capital reduction, overhead reduction and other financial and operational goals and objectives.

 

28

---

Table of Contents

PROGRAM		DESCRIPTION		OBJECTIVES
Annual Discretionary Incentive Bonus		•  Cash bonuses awarded at the discretion of the Committee. The Committee may consider any circumstances it deems appropriate in awarding these discretionary bonuses.		•  Provides the Committee with flexibility to reward individual performance not reflected in formulaic metrics. •  Focus employees on performance. •  Reviewed annually for individual contribution in context of Company performance – and internal pay equity and external benchmarking.
LONG-TERM COMPENSATION:
Long-Term Incentive Program		•  A long-term incentive program using a combination of stock appreciation rights and time-vested and performance-based awards. The performance-based awards are subject to a multi-year performance period, currently based on growth in EBITDA and ROIC targets.		•  Focus on long-term Company performance and long-term success. •  Retention. •  Employee alignment with stockholders via performance goals and stock ownership.
OTHER EXECUTIVE BENEFITS:
Retirement Programs		•  Company offers an ERISA-qualified defined contribution plan, a non-qualified plan designed to restore benefits that would have otherwise been received by participants but for applicable IRS limits, and pension retirement plans for designated employees located outside the U.S.		•  Attract qualified employees. •  Retention. •  Provide vehicle for retirement.
Perquisites		•  Company-provided automobiles and related insurance and maintenance (or, alternatively, an allowance for the same). •  Relocation benefits.		•  Attract qualified employees.
Other Benefits		•  Medical, dental, vision, life insurance, short and long-term disability, employee assistance program, employee stock purchase plan, and other benefits.		•  Attract qualified employees. •  Retention. •  Provide competitive benefits to employees.

Base Salary

We pay an annual base salary to each of our NEOs in order to provide them with a fixed rate of cash compensation that is “non-variable” during the fiscal year. For fiscal year 2012, the Committee targeted base salary at the 40^th percentile of the Peer Data; however, actual base salary may be above or below the 40^th percentile based on the Committee’s review of the underlying scope of an NEO’s responsibilities, individual performance and experience, internal pay equity, and retention concerns. For fiscal year 2013, in connection with a comprehensive evaluation of the Company’s overall compensation program, our target base salary increased from the 40^th percentile to the 50^th percentile of Peer Data to further enhance our ability to attract and retain key executive talent. The Committee strives to maintain salaries at a level that will attract top talent, while linking a significant portion of an executive’s total compensation opportunity to our success. The fiscal year 2012 salary increases described below were generally made to bring the base salary levels of our NEOs into closer alignment with the Peer Data and, in the case of Mr. Alvarado, reflected his promotion from the position of Chief Operating Officer of the Company to President and CEO of the Company.

 

29

---

Table of Contents

For fiscal year 2012, the annual base salaries were adjusted as follows:

 

•

Mr. Alvarado’s base salary increased from $650,000 to $750,000;

 

•

Neither Ms. Smith’s nor Mr. Zoellner’s base salary increased during fiscal year 2012;

 

•

Mr. Porter’s base salary increased from $440,000 to $500,000;

 

•

Ms. Bruder’s base salary increased from $355,000 to $400,000; and

 

•

Mr. Alleman’s base salary increased from $315,000 to $346,500.

Annual Cash Incentive Bonus

At the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders approved the Commercial Metals Company 2006 Cash Incentive Plan (the “2006 Cash Plan”), the purpose of which is to advance the interests of the Company and our stockholders by:

 

•

providing those employees designated by the Committee, which may include NEOs, other senior executives, senior managers and other employees, incentive compensation tied to stockholder goals for Company and individual performance;

 

•

identifying and rewarding superior performance;

 

•

providing competitive compensation to attract, motivate, and retain outstanding employees who achieve superior financial performance for us; and

 

•

fostering accountability and teamwork throughout the Company.

In accordance with the terms of the 2006 Cash Plan, the Committee establishes appropriate performance periods, designates those executives eligible to participate, sets the level of potential awards and determines the financial targets or other performance measures which, if attained, result in payment of awards (the “performance goals”). Management may periodically make recommendations as to these matters, but the Committee makes all decisions with respect to the implementation of the 2006 Cash Plan. In establishing performance goals, the Committee reviews industry and market conditions, projected general economic conditions, both our past and forecasted performance levels applicable to those executives with overall Company responsibilities and, with respect to Mr. Porter and Mr. Zoellner, each business unit for which they are responsible.

The performance period for the annual bonus (the “Annual Cash Incentive Bonus”) is our fiscal year. The Annual Cash Incentive Bonus is designed to focus our executives on short-term return and, in the case of business unit leaders, EBITDA and RONA goals (each as defined below). We believe that these goals in concert help ensure that executives are focused on effectively utilizing our assets, maximizing operational efficiencies and seeking profitable growth opportunities.

The table below sets forth each NEO’s fiscal year 2012 threshold, target and maximum bonus opportunities, expressed as a percentage of base salary. Target Annual Cash Incentive Bonus opportunity is designed to achieve, when combined with base salary, compensation at approximately the 50^th percentile of Peer Data.

2012 Annual Cash Incentive Bonus Opportunity

Expressed as a Percentage of Base Salary at Beginning of Fiscal Year 2012

 

Name		Threshold				Target				Maximum
Joseph Alvarado			50	%			100	%			300	%
Barbara R. Smith			35	%			75	%			195	%
Hanns K. Zoellner			37.5	%			75	%			210	%
Tracy L. Porter			37.5	%			75	%			210	%
Ann J. Bruder			30	%			60	%			165	%
James B. Alleman			30	%			60	%			165	%

 

30

---

Table of Contents

The 2012 performance goals were based on overall Company performance and business unit performance. For Mr. Alvarado, Ms. Smith, Ms. Bruder and Mr. Alleman, their 2012 Annual Cash Incentive Bonus was based entirely on overall Company FIFO Net Income and ROIC (each as defined below), with each performance goal weighted equally. For Messrs. Zoellner and Porter, their 2012 Annual Cash Incentive Bonus was based 50% on overall Company FIFO Net Income and ROIC and 50% on their respective business unit RONA and EBITDA, with each performance goal weighted equally.

With regard to fiscal year 2012, the Committee established annual performance targets that were aligned with the Company’s operating plans to further incentivize participants to achieve the Company’s business plans. At the time the performance goals were established, the Committee decided to exclude the impact of the certain one-time, extraordinary charges associated with the Company’s exit from the CMC Sisak mill in Croatia as well as certain costs associated in responding to the fiscal year 2012 tender offer by IEP Metals Sub LLC. The decision to exclude these items was based on the Committee’s belief that the compensation paid under the bonus plan should reflect the Company’s operating performance and should not be impacted by these unusual and non-recurring charges. In addition, at the time the performance goals were established, the Committee decided to exclude the impact of fluctuations in the Company’s effective tax rate and, instead, the performance targets as well as the measurement of performance against those targets was based on the statutory tax rate applicable to the Company.

The portion of the bonus tied to CMC financial performance metrics became payable, in the absence of negative discretion by the Committee, if CMC achieved its threshold FIFO Net Income. The portion of the NEOs’ bonus that was tied to business unit performance became payable if the Company met its FIFO Net Income goal and both the RONA and EBITDA goals were achieved. If RONA and EBITDA goals were met, then bonuses would be automatically paid. Payouts for performance in excess of threshold are determined using straight line interpolation.

The following tables set forth the fiscal year 2012 performance goals applicable to each NEO.

Mr. Alvarado’s, Ms. Smith’s, Ms. Bruder’s and Mr. Alleman’s 2012  Annual Cash Incentive Bonus Performance Goals

 

Commercial Metals Company		Weighting		Threshold		Target		Maximum
FIFO Net Income(1)		50%		$65M		$93M		$130M
ROIC(2)		50%		4%		5.7%		7.9%

Mr. Zoellner’s 2012 Annual Cash Incentive Bonus Performance Goals

 

Commercial Metals Company		Weighting		Threshold		Target		Maximum
FIFO Net Income(1)		50%		$65M		$93M		$130M
ROIC(2)		50%		4%		5.7%		7.9%
Business Unit Performance Goal (International Division)		Weighting		Threshold		Target		Maximum
RONA(3)		50%		7.5%		10.7%		15%
EBITDA(4)		50%		$100M		$143M		$200M

Mr. Porter’s 2012 Annual Cash Incentive Bonus Performance Goals

 

Commercial Metals Company		Weighting		Threshold		Target		Maximum
FIFO Net Income(1)		50%		$65M		$93M		$130M
ROIC(2)		50%		4%		5.7%		7.9%
Business Unit Performance Goal (Americas Division)		Weighting		Threshold		Target		Maximum
RONA(3)		50%		11%		15.7%		21.9%
EBITDA(4)		50%		$207M		$296M		$415M

 

31

---

Table of Contents

 

(1)	FIFO Net Income means net earnings calculated using the first in, first out (“FIFO”) inventory costing principle for all inventories.

 

(2)	ROIC means FIFO Net Income before interest expense divided by the sum of commercial paper, notes payable, current maturities of long-term debt, debt and stockholders equity.

 

(3)	For an applicable business unit, RONA means the percentage obtained by dividing Operating Profit by the value of average net assets, determined by using the FIFO inventory costing principle.

 

(4)	For an applicable business unit, EBITDA means FIFO Net Income before income taxes, interest (both internal and external), depreciation, amortization expenses and the impairment of depreciable and other intangible assets.

Based on the Company’s and business unit’s performance, the NEOs holding Company-wide positions, received a payout of 83% of target and Messrs. Zoellner and Porter received payouts of 56% and 120% of target, respectively. Accordingly, Messrs. Alvarado, Zoellner, Porter and Alleman and Ms. Smith and Ms. Bruder received Annual Cash Incentive Bonuses of $623,200, $249,322, $449,300, $172,700, $292,000 and $199,400, respectively, each of which is included in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column to the Summary Compensation Table.

Discretionary Bonuses

In addition to the Annual Cash Incentive Bonus, the Committee may, in its discretion, approve additional discretionary cash awards to employees, including the NEOs (the “Annual Discretionary Incentive”). Any Annual Discretionary Incentive is calculated solely at the discretion of the Committee. The Annual Discretionary Incentive allows the Committee to award discretionary bonuses in response to circumstances unforeseen at the beginning of the fiscal year. At the end of each fiscal year the Committee determines whether any discretionary awards are deemed warranted and, if so, in what amount. Each discretionary cash award is based on the Committee’s evaluation of the individual’s overall job performance, including (i) progress toward non-financial or less objective goals such as employee development, training, leadership and succession planning, (ii) a qualitative assessment of the business and competitive conditions in which we operate, and (iii) issues of internal pay equity and external benchmarking.

After reviewing the Company and individual performance for fiscal year 2012, the Committee determined that it was appropriate to award discretionary bonuses to certain of the NEOs to recognize and reward management for its strong operational performance during fiscal year 2012 along with the successful defense of the hostile tender offer and proxy contest. Accordingly, Messrs. Alvarado, Porter and Alleman and Ms. Smith and Ms. Bruder received discretionary bonuses of $126,800, $75,700, $27,300, $108,000 and $70,600, respectively.

Long-Term Incentives

Through our long-term incentive program, we provide senior executives, including participating NEOs, the opportunity for cash and equity awards contingent on the attainment of multi-year performance goals. Acting in concert, the Annual Cash Incentive Bonus, the Annual Discretionary Incentive, and long-term incentive programs provide balanced cash incentives and equity incentives that reward executive focus on delivering both financial results and long-term growth. Both equity and cash are used in order to facilitate retention, provide long-term motivation and focus executives on increasing stockholder value. The target long-term incentive awards are designed to achieve, when combined with base salary and the target Annual Cash Incentive Bonus, approximately the 50^th percentile, or slightly higher, of Peer Data and, when achieving maximum performance, to reach total compensation at the upper quartile or better of Peer Data.

Fiscal Year 2012 – Fiscal Year 2014 Combined Long-Term Incentive Program

In fiscal year 2012, the Committee approved the 2012 – 2014 Combined Long-Term Incentive Program with the long-term incentive awards to be delivered in the form of time-vested restricted stock units (“RSUs”), stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) and performance-vested stock units (“PSUs”). The RSU awards vest ratably

 

32

---

Table of Contents

over a three-year period. The SAR awards vest 50% on each of the second and third anniversaries of the date of grant. For the PSUs, the performance period began on September 1, 2011 and will end on August 31, 2014. The PSU awards are measured over the performance period based on the achievement of growth in net earnings before interest (including accounts receivable securitization program expenses), taxes, depreciation, amortization and accrual for prior years’ long-term cash incentive awards (“EBITDA”), and return on invested capital (“ROIC”) targets. Under the terms of the award agreements, the Committee may exercise its discretion to reduce the award payments in the event that the Company’s total stockholder return is below the 40th percentile of the Peer Group. The 2012 – 2014 PSUs will be settled in cash, with the settlement value of the PSUs determined based on the closing share price on the last day of the performance period. A minimum performance level (threshold) is established below which no payment will be made to any participant as well as a target and maximum award payment for each participant. For the 2012 – 2014 performance period, the Committee established the payout formula to encourage strong, focused performance with each performance level representing what the Committee deemed to be stretch performance goals given the economic and market conditions at the time the goals were set.

The following table sets forth the target award opportunity, expressed as a percentage of base salary, under the 2012-2014 Combined Long-term Incentive Program.

Fiscal Year 2012 through 2014 Combined Long-Term Incentive Opportunity

Expressed as a Percentage of Base Salary at Beginning of Performance Period

 

Name		Threshold		Target		Maximum
Joseph Alvarado		90%		200%		340%
Barbara R. Smith		70%		150%		255%
Hanns K. Zoellner(1)		16%		34%		57%
Tracy L. Porter		70%		150%		255%
Ann J. Bruder		70%		150%		255%
James B. Alleman		70%		150%		255%

 

(1)

In anticipation of Mr. Zoellner’s retirement form the Company, the Committee approved a reduced long-term incentive award opportunity for Mr. Zoellner compared to the Company’s historical equity grant practice and the equity awards granted to the other participants in the 2012-2014 Combined Long-Term Incentive Program.

The following table sets forth the aggregate long-term incentive target award, expressed as a percentage of base salary, to be delivered in the form of RSUs, SARs and PSUs.

Fiscal Year 2012 through 2014 Combined Long-Term Incentive Awards

Expressed as a Percentage of Base Salary at Beginning of Performance Period

 

						PSUs:
Name		RSU’s		SAR’s		Threshold LTI-EBITDA		Target LTI-EBITDA		Maximum LTI-EBITDA
Joseph Alvarado		87%		87%		72%		160%		272%
Barbara R. Smith		45%		45%		53%		123%		209%
Hanns K. Zoellner(1)		0%		0%		16%		34%		57%
Tracy L. Porter		45%		45%		28%		60%		102%
Ann J. Bruder		45%		45%		28%		60%		102%
James B. Alleman		45%		45%		28%		60%		102%

 

(1)

Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Zoellner’s retirement and transition agreement, 7,397 PSUs of the 20,000 PSUs granted to Mr. Zoellner under the 2012-2014 Combined Long-Term Incentive Program remain eligible for vesting, with the actual vesting of the PSUs determined based on the Company’s achievement of performance goals.

 

33

---

Table of Contents

Special Equity Grants Awarded to Mr. Alvarado and Ms. Smith

In addition, to the annual equity grants described above, Mr. Alvarado and Ms. Smith received one-time supplemental equity grants in fiscal year 2012. Mr. Alvarado’s equity grant was granted in connection with his promotion to the position of President and CEO of the Company and delivered in the form of 34,934 SARs, 17,467 RSUs and 52,402 PSUs, at target performance. The Committee approved Mr. Alvarado’s grant based on the advice of its independent compensation consultant, Ernst & Young LLP, as well as Peer Data for individuals serving as chief executive officer. Ms. Smith’s equity grant was granted in connection with the negotiation of the terms of her employment and delivered in the form of a supplemental PSU award of 26,154 PSUs, at target performance. The Committee approved Ms. Smith’s equity grant based on its review of Peer Data and to compensate Ms. Smith for equity forfeited at her prior employer. The vesting terms applicable to Mr. Alvarado’s and Ms. Smith’s special equity grants are the same as the vesting terms applicable to the SARs, RSUs and PSUs granted under the Company’s 2012-2014 Combined Long-Term Incentive Award program. For further information regarding these grants, please see the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2012 table.

Prior Years’ Outstanding Long-Term Incentive Programs

During fiscal year 2012, the Company had two outstanding long-term incentive programs. For the 2011 –2013 performance period, the PSU awards will be settled based on the Company’s achievement of growth in net earnings before interest (including accounts receivable securitization program expenses), taxes, depreciation, amortization and accrual for prior years’ long-term cash incentive awards (“EBITDA”), and return on invested capital (“ROIC”) targets. Under the terms of the award agreements, the Committee may exercise its discretion to reduce the award payments in the event that the Company’s total stockholder return is below the 40^th percentile of the Peer Group. The 2011 – 2013 PSUs will be settled 50% in cash and 50% in stock, with the settlement value of the PSUs determined based on the closing share price on the last day of the performance period. For the 2010-2012 performance period, growth in Company-wide EBITDA was used as the sole performance goal for the 2010-2012 PSUs. The minimum hurdle to reach a threshold long-term cash incentive payment was EBITDA equal to $810,000,000. Since the threshold EBITDA performance goal was not achieved for the 2010-2012 performance period, no long-term cash incentive payments were attributable to the three-year performance period ended August 31, 2012.

Other Elements of Compensation

As described below, we also provide retirement benefits and health and other welfare benefits to our NEOs.

Retirement and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Benefits

Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plan:    The primary tax qualified long-term compensation retirement plan we have for our employees in the United States is the Commercial Metals Company’s Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plan (the “PS/401(k) Plan”). The PS/401(k) Plan is a defined contribution plan and all Company contributions to the plan are discretionary. In addition, Mr. Zoellner has participated in a Swiss pension plan applicable to employees based in Switzerland. This plan is described in further detail on page 44. The amounts contributed to the Swiss pension plan on behalf of Mr. Zoellner and the PS/401(k) Plan on behalf of each of the other NEOs are listed in the Summary Compensation Table on page 38.

Benefit Restoration Plan:    As a result of limitations mandated by federal tax law and regulations that limit defined contribution plan retirement benefits of more highly compensated employees, the Company provides the Benefit Restoration Plan (“BRP”), a non-qualified plan for certain executives, including each of the NEOs, designated by the Committee, who are subject to federally mandated benefit limits in the PS/401(k) Plan. Following each calendar year-end, we credit to the participant’s account under the BRP a dollar amount equal to the amount of Company contributions that the participant would have received under the PS/401(k) Plan but for the limits imposed by law on Company contributions to that plan. A BRP participant may also elect to defer up to fifty percent (50%) of compensation into his or her BRP account. The Committee believes that the BRP is an important element of our long-term compensation program because it helps attract and retain talent in a competitive market. The amounts contributed to the BRP plan on behalf of each of the participating NEOs are listed in the Summary Compensation Table on page 38.

 

34

---

Table of Contents

Supplemental Retirement Benefit to Mr. Zoellner:    In fiscal year 2010, we engaged Towers Watson in Zurich to review our Swiss pension plan to determine local competitiveness. Towers Watson found that for most employee age groups, the current Swiss pension plan contributions were competitive; however, Mr. Zoellner’s contributions were generally less than competitive over the last 10 years. Given the Company’s mandatory executive retirement age of 65, unlike other employees, Mr. Zoellner would not have enough future years of employment to make up for the contributions to be competitive. Therefore, the Committee determined that a payment in the amount of 198,935 Swiss francs (equivalent to $207,570 U.S. Dollars based on an exchange rate of .9584 Swiss francs to 1 U.S. Dollar which was the exchange rate on August 31, 2011) would be made to Mr. Zoellner in fiscal years 2010, 2011 and 2012, provided that Mr. Zoellner remained an employee of the Company.

Perquisites

We provide leased cars and related insurance and maintenance or, alternatively, car allowances to U.S.-based NEOs in order to facilitate the successful achievement of their and our performance. We do not own or provide to the NEOs corporate aircraft, security services, personal tax or financial planning, an executive dining room or similar perquisites. In fiscal year 2013, the Company has made annual physicals and certain financial planning services available to the Company’s senior leadership, including the NEOs.

Medical and Other Welfare Benefits

Our U.S.-based NEOs, along with all other employees, are eligible to participate in medical, dental, vision, life, accidental death and disability, long-term disability, short-term disability, and other employee benefits made available to employees.

Termination, Severance and Change in Control Benefits

In recognition of the years of dedication and service to the Company, in July 2012, the Committee approved a retirement and transition agreement for Mr. Zoellner. Under this agreement, Mr. Zoellner is bound to certain post-employment restrictive covenants following his retirement. In consideration of these restrictive covenants as well as Mr. Zoellner’s release of claims and his agreement to be available to the Company for assistance in performing certain transition obligations, under Mr. Zoellner’s retirement agreement, Mr. Zoellner is entitled to the following in connection with his retirement: (i) continued payment of his current salary through December 31, 2012; (ii) continued eligibility for an annual cash bonus for fiscal year 2012 pursuant to the terms of his retirement agreement; (iii) continued health benefits and other perquisites through December 31, 2012; (iv) accelerated vesting on December 31, 2012 of 30,000 PSUs granted on June 3, 2010; (v) accelerated vesting on December 31, 2012 of 20,000 RSUs granted on June 3, 2010; (vi) the vesting of 6,752 RSUs of the 14,123 RSUs granted to Mr. Zoellner on January 18, 2011; (vii) eligibility for vesting of 22,598 PSUs of the 31,776 PSUs granted to Mr. Zoellner on January 18, 2011, with actual vesting to be determined based on the Company’s achievement at the end of the performance period of performance goals applicable to the PSUs; (viii) eligibility for vesting of 7,397 PSUs of the 20,000 PSUs granted to Mr. Zoellner on November 23, 2011, with actual vesting to be determined based on the Company’s achievement at the end of the performance period of performance goals applicable to the PSUs; (ix) severance equal to two times Mr. Zoellner’s current base salary; (x) a $300,000 cash payment as a supplement to Mr. Zoellner’s reduced fiscal year 2012 long-term equity award; and (xi) Mr. Zoellner’s full supplemental retirement payment of $207,570 for fiscal year 2012. The amounts to be paid to Mr. Zoellner pursuant to this agreement will be paid following Mr. Zoellner’s December 31, 2012 retirement from the Company, subject to Mr. Zoellner’s continued services through such date.

As of August 31, 2012, the employment agreements with each of our NEOs provide severance benefits upon a qualifying termination of employment. In addition, we have entered into Executive Employment Continuity Agreements (“EECAs”) with each of the NEOs, which provide for enhanced severance benefits in the event of a qualifying termination of employment within two years following a Change in Control (as defined in such agreements). The termination provisions included in the employment agreements and EECAs are further described below in the Potential Payments and Benefits Upon Termination or Change in Control section. The Committee believes the payments provided for under the employment agreements and EECAs upon a qualifying

 

35

---

Table of Contents

termination of employment to be reasonable in light of the non-competition obligations imposed upon the NEOs post-termination and in order to ensure that we have the continued attention and dedication of the executives during circumstances that could result in a change in control.

In addition to the EECAs, our existing equity incentive plans also provide for accelerated vesting of stock-based awards regardless of whether a termination occurs as a result of a Change in Control, as defined by such plans. Further, the 2006 Cash Plan provides that in the event of a Change in Control, the Committee has discretion to take action to determine the extent to which incentive compensation is considered earned and payable during any performance period, consistent with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (the “Code”).

Evolving Structure of Executive Compensation Programs for Fiscal Year 2013

The Committee elected to make several changes to our executive pay program for fiscal year 2013, and in conjunction with these changes, the Company retained Hay Group as its new independent compensation consultant. These changes are intended to achieve a number of important objectives, including, but not limited to:

 

•

enhancing individual accountability in determining incentive pay;

 

•

strengthening the pay for performance alignment of our overall compensation program;

 

•

focusing on elements of performance that are within our executives’ control, allowing us to plan for the cyclical nature of our business; and

 

•

strengthening the alignment between our pay program and our business strategy, which the Committee believes will further align our executive compensation program with the interests of our stockholders.

These prospective changes include the following:

 

•

Increasing our target base salary competitiveness from the 40th percentile to the 50th percentile to further enhance the retentive nature of our program and to aid in attracting key executive talent;

 

•

Reducing maximum annual incentive payout levels for our CEO to two times the target payout level, in order to better align our program with our business strategy and market standards;

 

•

Implementing an “umbrella” approach under our annual incentive plan, in order to strengthen the ability of the Committee to establish individual performance objectives while still preserving the tax deductibility of compensation paid under such plan;

 

•

Diversifying our annual incentive plan scorecard to better allow the Committee to hold management accountable for their performance against strategic, operational, functional and/or individual goals;

 

•

Further aligning the long-term incentive program with the Company’s relative performance by adding a custom Peer Group (in addition to the competitor Peer Group) for the vesting a portion of the long-term incentive awards granted to our executive officers;

 

•

Rebalancing our emphasis on performance-vested restricted stock and time-vested restricted stock in order to create a balanced portfolio that better aligns long-term incentive payouts with achievement of specific long-term objectives, while fostering an ownership mentality and enhancing the retentive strength of our long-term incentive program;

 

•

Paying out future grants of performance-vested restricted stock entirely in shares, in order to enhance the alignment with shareholders, promote ownership, and achieve more efficient accounting;

 

•

Increasing the maximum payout level of our performance-vested restricted stock to two times the target payout level, in order to enhance the motivational value of the program and to better align with market practices;

 

•

Strengthening the definition of ownership for purposes of achieving our executive stock ownership guidelines by eliminating the counting of unvested performance-vested shares under those guidelines; and

 

•

Requiring our executives to achieve their ownership guidelines within five years.

 

36

---

Table of Contents

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

Section 162(m) of the Code limits the amount of compensation paid to our CEO and our other three most highly compensated executive officers, other than our CFO, that may be deducted by us for federal income tax purposes in any fiscal year to $1,000,000. “Performance-based” compensation that has been approved by our stockholders and otherwise satisfies the performance-based requirements under Section 162(m) of the Code is not subject to the Code’s $1,000,000 deduction limit. While the Committee believes that it is important for compensation paid to our NEOs to be tax deductible under the Code, the Committee also recognizes the need to retain flexibility to make compensation decisions that may not meet the standards of Section 162(m) when necessary to enable the Company to continue to attract, retain, reward and motivate its highly-qualified executives.

Relationship between Prior Compensation and Current Compensation

In evaluating executive compensation, the Committee periodically reviews tally sheets and wealth accumulation information considering all forms of Company paid compensation paid to NEOs.

Stock Ownership Policy and Policy Regarding Hedging of Company Stock

The Board of Directors has implemented stock ownership guidelines for directors, all NEOs, other officers and certain designated senior level employees. The Board of Directors believes that minimum ownership guidelines serve to further align the interests of those covered by the guidelines with our stockholders. Beginning in fiscal year 2013, executives who are hired or promoted into positions covered by the guidelines have five years following such date to attain the minimum ownership level applicable to their positions, and individuals who are elected to serve on the Board of Directors have five years from their election date to attain the minimum ownership level applicable to directors. The guidelines require ownership of Company stock with a value based on the grant date fair value or the purchase date fair value as determined on January 31st of each year, of not less than the following amounts:

 

•

Non-employee directors – five times the annual cash retainer paid to all non-employee directors;

 

•

President and CEO – five times base salary; and

 

•

Executive Vice Presidents, Senior Vice Presidents, each Company business segment President, the CFO and the General Counsel – three times base salary.

The greater of current fair market value and the grant date fair value of unvested restricted and unexercised stock and options, stock appreciation rights and similar equity incentives is included when determining the amount of stock ownership. Beginning in fiscal year 2013, unvested performance stock awards will not count for purposes of determining compliance with the stock ownership guidelines and all NEOs must retain 50% of all vested shares until achievement of the retention levels. As of October 22, 2012, all directors and NEOs have met or, within the applicable period, are expected to meet the stock ownership guidelines.

In 2002, the Board of Directors adopted an expanded policy on “insider trading” prohibiting all employees from buying or selling Company stock while aware of material nonpublic information, and prohibiting the disclosure of material nonpublic information to others who then trade in our securities. The policy is available on our website, www.cmc.com, in the Corporate Governance section. As part of this policy, certain other Company stock related transactions by directors, officers and employees are also prohibited or subject to specific notice and pre-approval requirements. The policy is premised on the belief that even in those circumstances where the proposed transaction may not constitute a violation of law or applicable regulations, it is nonetheless considered inappropriate for any director, officer or other employee of ours to engage in short-term or speculative transactions in our securities which may be viewed as reducing their incentive to improve our performance or inconsistent with the objectives of our stockholders in general. Therefore, it is our policy that directors, officers and other employees may not engage in any transactions involving our securities which constitute short sales, puts, calls or other similar derivative securities. The policy prohibits certain other transactions including hedging or monetization transactions, such as zero-cost collars, forward sale contracts and arrangements pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan (without adequate assurance of other available assets to satisfy the loan). Prior to entering into such transactions, the policy requires notice to, review of the facts and circumstances by, and the pre-approval of, our General Counsel.

 

37

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following tables, footnotes and narratives, found on pages 38 through 53, provide information regarding the compensation, benefits and equity holdings in the Company for the NEOs.

FISCAL YEAR 2012 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

Name and Principal Position		Year				Salary ($)				Bonus ($)(4)				Stock Awards ($)(5)				Option Awards ($)(5)				Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(6)				All Other Compensation ($)(7)(8)				Total ($)
Joseph Alvarado(1) President and CEO			2012 2011 2010			$ $ $	748,846 557,692 165,385			$ $ $	126,800 750,000 0			$ $ $	1,793,057 1,092,000 828,800			$ $ $	416,681 0 0			$ $ $	623,200 0 0			$ $ $	75,977 58,765 1,799			$ $ $	3,784,561 2,458,457 995,984
Barbara R. Smith(2) Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer			2012 2011			$ $	475,000 115,096			$ $	108,000 300,000			$ $	781,976 260,400			$ $	137,023 0			$ $	292,000 0			$ $	18,056 400,002			$ $	1,812,055 1,075,498
Hanns K. Zoellner(3) Executive Advisor to CEO, Former Executive Vice President CMC and President – International Division			2012 2011 2010			$ $ $	600,011 602,011 470,215			$ $ $	0 200,000 0			$ $ $	232,000 826,176 847,600			$ $ $	0 0 0			$ $ $	249,322 0 0			$ $ $	268,667 336,231 263,986			$ $ $	1,350,000 1,964,418 1,581,801
Tracy L. Porter Senior Vice President CMC and President – CMC Americas Division			2012 2011 2010			$ $ $	499,308 440,000 342,077			$ $ $	75,700 500,000 0			$ $ $	503,782 644,702 797,800			$ $ $	144,235 0 0			$ $ $	449,300 0 0			$ $ $	42,153 34,573 9,894			$ $ $	1,714,477 1,619,274 1,149,771
Ann J. Bruder(2) Senior Vice President of Law Government Affairs & Global Compliance, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary			2012			$	399,481			$	70,600			$	403,030			$	115,388			$	199,400			$	43,424			$	1,231,324
James B. Alleman(2), Senior Vice President of Human Resources and Organizational Development			2012			$	346,136			$	27,300			$	349,116			$	99,956			$	172,700			$	23,070			$	1,018,278

 

(1)	Mr. Alvarado was appointed to the position of President and CEO, effective September 1, 2011.

 

(2)	Ms. Smith was not an NEO prior to fiscal year 2011 and Ms. Bruder and Mr. Alleman were not NEOs prior to fiscal year 2012.

 

(3)

Mr. Zoellner retired as Executive Vice President of Commercial Metals Company and President – CMC International Division, effective July 1, 2012, and assumed the role of Executive Advisor to the CEO on July 2, 2012. Mr. Zoellner’s annual base salary is set in Swiss francs. The salary amount included in the table is calculated using the average monthly exchange rate in effect over the twelve months of the fiscal year during which the salary was actually paid (for fiscal year 2012 the rate was .9266 Swiss francs to 1 U.S. Dollar). The amounts shown for Mr. Zoellner’s fiscal year 2012 incentive bonus, also paid in Swiss francs, use the exchange rate in effect at the time such bonus was paid (for fiscal year 2012 the rate was .9319 Swiss francs to 1 U.S. Dollar).

 

(4)	Amounts reported in fiscal year 2012 for each NEO other than Mr. Zoellner represent discretionary bonuses paid with respect to fiscal year 2012 performance. Please see the CD&A for further information regarding these bonuses.

 

(5)

Amounts reported in these columns for fiscal year 2012 represent the grant date fair value of PSUs, RSUs and SARs awarded in fiscal year 2012 and calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation (“FASB ASC

 

38

---

Table of Contents

Topic 718”). Grant date fair value for PSUs is based on the probable outcome of the performance-based vesting conditions as of the grant date. Assumptions used in determining these values can be found in Note 14 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on October 30, 2012. The maximum value of the PSUs for Messrs. Alvarado, Zoellner, Porter, Alleman, and Ms. Smith and Ms. Bruder, respectively, are as follows: $2,066,730, $394,400, $516,676, $358,057, $2,013,199 and $413,343.

 

(6)	Amounts reported in fiscal year 2012 for each NEO represent 2012 Annual Cash Incentive Bonus earned by each NEO. Please see the CD&A for further information regarding these bonuses.

 

(7)

For fiscal year 2012, this column includes contributions to the PS/401(k) Plan accounts of each of our participating NEOs as follows: $8,575 for Mr. Porter, $8,813 for Mr. Alvarado, $18,056 for Ms. Smith, $9,102 for Ms. Bruder and $9,738 for Mr. Alleman. This column also includes contributions to the BRP accounts of Mr. Alvarado of $52,224, Mr. Porter of $33,578 and Ms. Bruder of $20,039. All NEOs, except Mr. Zoellner, received a car allowance and/or reimbursed vehicle in fiscal year 2012, the value of which is included in this column if the amount is over $10,000. Messrs. Alvarado, Alleman and Ms. Bruder received vehicle-related amounts of $14,940, $13,332 and $14,284 respectively.

 

(8)

With respect solely to Mr. Zoellner, this includes the Company’s contribution of $51,838 to the Swiss SOBP and of $9,259 to the Swiss BVG (as both are defined on page 44), paid in Swiss francs, and set forth here in U.S. Dollars based on the August 31, 2012 exchange rate of .9584 Swiss francs to 1 U.S. Dollar. This also includes a Company pension make-up contribution of $207,570 paid in Swiss francs directly to Mr. Zoellner (as more fully described on page 44), and set forth here in U.S. Dollars based on the August 31, 2012 exchange rate.

 

39

---

Table of Contents

Grants of Plan Based Awards

The following table and footnotes provide information regarding grants of plan based awards to NEOs in fiscal year 2012.

GRANTS OF PLAN BASED AWARDS

IN FISCAL YEAR 2012

 

										Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)												Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2)												All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock				All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying				Exercise or Base Price of Option				Grant Date Fair Value Of Stock and Option
Name		Grant Date				Approval Date				Threshold ($)				Target ($)				Maximum ($)				Threshold (#)				Target (#)				Maximum (#)				or Units (#)(3)				Options (#)(5)				Awards ($/Sh)				Awards (6)
Joseph Alvarado										$	375,000			$	750,000			$	2,250,000				—				—				—				—				—				—
			11/23/2011				11/23/2011				—				—				—				—				—				—				—				78,603			$	11.60			$	288,473
			11/23/2011				11/23/2011				—				—				—				—				—				—				—				34,934	(4)		$	11.60			$	128,208
			11/23/2011				11/23/2011				—				—				—				36,681				52,402				68,123				—				—				—			$	607,863
			11/23/2011				11/23/2011				—				—				—				36,681				52,402				68,123				—				—				—			$	607,863
			11/23/2011				11/23/2011				—				—				—				—				—				—				39,301				—				—			$	399,691
			11/23/2011				11/23/2011				—				—				—				—				—				—				17,467	(4)			—				—			$	177,640
Barbara R. Smith										$	166,250			$	356,250			$	926,250				—				—				—				—				—				—				—
			11/23/2011				11/23/2011				—				—				—				—				—				—				—				37,336			$	11.60			$	137,023
			11/23/2011				11/23/2011				—				—				—				17,424				24,891				32,358				—											$	288,736
			11/23/2011				11/23/2011				—				—				—				—				—				—				18,668											$	189,854
			11/23/2011				06/01/2011				—				—				—				18,308				26,154				34,000				—											$	303,386
Hanns K. Zoellner										$	215,000			$	431,000			$	1,206,000				—				—				—				—				—				—				—
			11/23/2011				11/23/2011				—				—				—				14,000				20,000				26,000				—				—				—			$	232,000
Tracy L. Porter										$	187,500			$	375,000			$	1,050,000				—				—				—				—				—				—
			11/23/2011				11/23/2011				—				—				—				—				—				—				—				39,301			$	11.60			$	144,235
			11/23/2011				11/23/2011				—				—				—				18,341				26,201				34,061				—				—				—			$	303,932
			11/23/2011				11/23/2011				—				—				—				—				—				—				19,651				—				—			$	199,851
Ann J. Bruder										$	120,000			$	240,000			$	660,000				—				—				—				—				—				—				—
			11/23/2011				11/23/2011				—				—				—				—				—				—				—				31,441			$	11.60			$	115,389
			11/23/2011				11/23/2011				—				—				—				14,673				20,961				27,249				—				—				—			$	243,147
			11/23/2011				11/23/2011				—				—				—				—				—				—				15,721				—				—			$	159,883
James B. Alleman										$	103,950			$	207,900			$	571,250				—				—				—				—				—				—
			11/23/2011				11/23/2011				—				—				—				—				—				—				—				27,236			$	11.60			$	99,956
			11/23/2011				11/23/2011				—				—				—				12,710				18,157				23,604				—				—				—			$	210,621
			11/23/2011				11/23/2011				—				—				—				—				—				—				13,618				—				—			$	138,495

 

(1)	Represents the Annual Cash Incentive Bonus under the 2006 Cash Plan. The 2006 Cash Plan and the terms of these awards are described in the section entitled “Annual Cash Incentive Bonus” on pages 30 through 32.

 

(2)

Represents PSUs with vesting based on the Company’s achievement of performance goals relating to ROIC and EBITDA (each as defined in the CD&A) during fiscal years 2012-2014. The PSUs will be settled in cash. Under the terms of the award agreement, the Committee may exercise its discretion to reduce the award payments in the event that the Company’s total stockholder return is below the 40th percentile of the Peer Group. The PSU awards reported for Mr. Alvarado and Ms. Smith consist of their annual long-term incentive awards as well as an additional PSU award granted to each executive in connection with Mr. Alvarado’s promotion to the position of President and CEO of the Company and Ms. Smith’s commencement of employment with the Company.

 

(3)	Represents RSUs that vest ratably over three years from the date of grant.

 

(4)	Represents special equity awards granted to Mr. Alvarado in connection with his promotion to the position of President and CEO.

 

(5)	Represents SARs that vest 50% on the two-year anniversary of the date of grant and the remaining 50% on the three-year anniversary of the date of grant.

 

(6)

Represents the grant date fair value of SARs, PSUs and RSUs awarded in fiscal year 2012 and calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Grant date fair value for PSUs is based on the probable outcome of the performance-based vesting conditions as of the grant date. Assumptions used in determining these values can be found in Note 14 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on October 30, 2012.

 

40

---

Table of Contents

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan Based Awards Table

We have entered into employment agreements with each of our NEOs. The initial term of each agreement generally expires on the last day of the fiscal year following the two year anniversary of effective date of the employment agreement, with automatic one-year renewals thereafter unless terminated by either party. The employment agreements set forth a minimum annual base salary and provide that each executive is eligible to earn a bonus under our compensation program but has no guaranteed bonus amount. Each executive is also eligible to participate in or receive benefits under any plan or arrangement made generally available to our employees. Please see the Potential Payments and Benefits Upon Termination or Change in Control Tables and narrative on pages 45 through 53 for a description of the compensation to NEOs in the event of their termination following a Change in Control, as well as other events resulting in termination of employment. In all cases, the amounts of equity awards were calculated based on our closing share price of $12.74 on August 31, 2012.

Material terms of the grants of plan based awards are described in pages 30 through 32 where we have discussed the Annual Cash Incentive Bonus and pages 32 through 34 where we have discussed the long-term incentive awards. The fiscal year 2012 long-term incentive awards consisted of time-based SARs and RSUs and PSUs, with vesting based on EBITDA and ROIC, each as further described in the section entitled “Long-Term Incentives” on pages 32 through 34. The percentage of salary and bonus of each of the NEOs as compared to the total compensation in the Summary Compensation Table is as follows: Mr. Alvarado (40%), Ms. Smith (48%), Mr. Zoellner (63%), Mr. Porter (60%), Ms. Bruder (54%), and Mr. Alleman (54%).

 

41

---

Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table and footnotes provide information regarding unexercised stock options and vested and unvested SARs and unvested PSUs and RSUs as of the end of fiscal year 2012. The market value of shares that have not vested was determined by multiplying the closing market price of our stock on August 31, 2012, $12.74, by the number of shares that have not vested.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS

AT 2012 FISCAL YEAR-END

 

		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options								Option Exercise Price ($)				Option Expiration Date				Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested				Market Value of Shares Or Units Of Stock That Have Not Vested				Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units, or other Rights That Have Not Vested				Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market Value or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units, or other Rights That Have Not Vested
Name		Exercisable (#)				Unexercisable (#)
Joseph Alvarado			—				113,603	(9)		$	11.600				11/23/2018				17,500	(1)		$	222,950				35,000	(2)		$	445,900
			—				—				—				—				20,000	(5)		$	254,800				40,000	(3)		$	509,600
			—				—				—				—				56,768	(8)		$	723,225				104,804	(4)		$	1,335,202
Barbara R. Smith			—				37,336	(9)		$	11.600				11/23/2018				13,334	(7)		$	169,875				51,045	(4)		$	650,313
			—				—				—				—				18,668	(8)		$	237,830				—				—
Hanns K. Zoellner			37,000				—			$	35.380				5/20/2015				20,000	(1)		$	254,800				31,776	(3)		$	404,826
			51,790				—			$	34.280				6/22/2014				14,123	(5)		$	179,927				30,000	(2)		$	382,200
			17,300				—			$	24.570				5/23/2013				—				—				20,000	(4)		$	254,800
Tracy L. Porter			7,230				—			$	35.380				5/20/2015				13,334	(6)		$	169,875				25,000	(2)		$	318,500
			12,040				—			$	34.280				6/22/2014				11,021	(5)		$	140,408				24,796	(3)		$	315,901
			5,000				—			$	24.570				5/23/2013				19,651	(8)		$	250,354				26,201	(4)		$	333,801
			—				39,301	(9)		$	11.600				11/23/2018				—				—				—				—
Ann J. Bruder			13,000				—			$	35.380				5/20/2015				16,500	(1)		$	210,210				13,338	(3)		$	169,926
			—				31,441	(9)		$	11.600				11/23/2018				5,928	(5)		$	75,523				25,000	(2)		$	318,500
			—				—				—				—				15,721	(8)		$	200,286				20,961	(4)		$	267,043
James B. Alleman			10,400				—			$	24.710				5/30/2013				15,000	(1)		$	191,100				25,000	(2)		$	318,500
			14,750				—			$	34.280				6/22/2014				5,260	(5)		$	67,012				11,834	(3)		$	150,765
			14,000				—			$	35.380				5/20/2015				13,618	(8)		$	173,493				18,157	(4)		$	231,320
			—				27,236	(9)		$	11.600				11/23/2018				—				—				—				—

 

(1)	Represents RSUs granted on June 3, 2010, with fifty percent (50%) vesting two years after the date of grant and the remaining fifty percent (50%) vesting four years after the date of grant.

 

(2)

Represents PSUs granted on June 3, 2010. Fifty-percent (50%) of the PSUs vest if the Company ranks at the 50th percentile on a total stockholder return basis as compared to the Peer Group with the total stockholder return based on the average of the closing prices for the month of June 2010 versus the average of the closing prices for the month of June 2013; and 100% of the PSUs vest if the Company ranks at or greater than the 60th percentile on a total stockholder return basis as compared to the Peer Group with the total stockholder return based on the average of the closing prices for the month of June 2010 versus the average of the closing prices for the month of June 2013. Vesting will be calculated on a straight line interpolation basis for a rank on a total stockholder return basis as compared to our Peer Group between the 50th percentile (with a vesting percentage of 50%) and 60th percentile (with a vesting percentage of 100%). The NEO must be employed by us on the date of vesting to receive the shares of common stock. The Committee has the discretion to accelerate the vesting of the PSUs upon retirement or early permitted retirement. In accordance with the SEC executive compensation disclosure rules, the amounts reported in this table are based on achieving threshold performance goals.

 

(3)

Represents PSUs granted on January 18, 2011, with vesting based on the Company’s achievement of performance goals relating to ROIC and EBITDA during fiscal years 2011-2013. Under the terms of the award agreement, the Committee may exercise its discretion to reduce the award payments in the event that

 

42

---

Table of Contents

the Company’s total stockholder return is below the 40th percentile of the Peer Group. In accordance with the SEC executive compensation disclosure rules, the amounts reported in this table are based on achieving threshold performance goals.

 

(4)

Represents PSUs granted on November 23, 2011, with vesting based on the Company’s achievement of performance goals relating to ROIC and EBITDA (each as defined in the CD&A) during fiscal years 2012-2014. Any vested PSUs will be settled in cash, with the value of the PSU determined by reference to the Company stock. Under the terms of the award agreement, the Committee may exercise its discretion to reduce the award payments in the event that the Company’s total stockholder return is below the 40th percentile of the Peer Group.

 

(5)	Represents RSUs granted on January 18, 2011, with one-third of the award vesting after one year from the date of grant, one-third vesting after two years from the date of grant and the remaining one-third vesting three years after the date of grant.

 

(6)	Represents RSUs granted on June 3, 2010, with one-third of the award vesting one year after the date of grant, one-third of the award vesting two years after the date of grant and the remaining one-third vesting three years after the date of grant.

 

(7)	Represents RSUs granted on June 1, 2011, with one-third of the award vesting one year after the date of grant, one-third of the award vesting two years after the date of grant and the remaining one-third vesting three years after the date of grant.

 

(8)	Represents RSUs granted on November 23, 2011, with one-third of the award vesting one year after the date of grant, one-third of the award vesting two years after the date of grant and the remaining one-third vesting three years after the date of grant.

 

(9)	Represents SARs granted on November 23, 2011, with fifty percent (50%) vesting two years after the date of grant and the remaining fifty percent (50%) vesting three years after the date of grant.

Options or SARs Exercised and Stock Vested

The following table provides information regarding stock option and SAR exercises and stock vesting during fiscal year 2012 for the NEOs.

OPTION/SARS EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

IN FISCAL YEAR 2012

 

 

		Option/SARs Awards								Stock Awards
Name		Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)				Value Realized on Exercise ($)				Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)				Value Realized on     Vesting ($)
Joseph Alvarado			0			$	0				27,500			$	332,750
Barbara R. Smith			0			$	0				6,666			$	77,459
Hanns K. Zoellner			0			$	0				27,061			$	323,769
Tracy L. Porter			8,400			$	17,052				18,843			$	226,228
Ann J. Bruder			0			$	0				19,464			$	230,084
James B. Alleman			0			$	0				17,630			$	208,332

Nonqualified Defined Contributions and Other Deferred Compensation Plans

All of the NEOs, excluding Mr. Zoellner due to his Swiss residence, have previously been designated by the Committee as being eligible to participate in the BRP. Participants can elect to defer W-2 earnings, including annual bonus awards, to a maximum of 50% of such earnings. Deferrals were matched up to 3.5% from September 1, 2011 through June 30, 2012 and 4.5% beginning on July 1, 2012, with the matching contributions

 

43

---

Table of Contents

vesting after two years of service. Annually, BRP participants must elect, prior to the fiscal year in which the compensation to be credited or deferred to the BRP is earned, the time at which they want distributions from the BRP. Amounts may be deferred for a minimum of one year. Distribution election options include commencement upon retirement either in a lump sum or installments or at a set future date either in lump sum or installments even if employment continues with us. In the event of death or disability, the participant or his or her estate will receive a lump sum payment. The payment of amounts deferred by NEOs after December 31, 2004 and that are to be paid after termination of employment, will be delayed for six months following termination of employment in order to comply with Section 409A of the Code.

Amounts deferred into the BRP by the participant as well as contributions by us are credited with market earnings or losses based on the participant’s self- directed investment election and allocation among a group of mutual funds. The mutual funds available in the BRP have investment objectives similar, but not identical to, those funds available to all employees under our tax-qualified plan. There is no above-market or preferential interest rates credited on any compensation deferred in the BRP. Participants may change fund choices on a daily basis to the extent permitted by the funds.

Mr. Zoellner resides in Switzerland, is not a U.S. citizen and does not participate in the PS/401(k) Plan or the BRP. He participates instead in the Swiss Federal Law on Occupations Retirement, Survivors’ and Disability Pension Plan (the “BVG”) as well as a Supplementary Occupational Benefits Plan (the “SOBP,” collectively with the BVG, the “Swiss pension plan”), both of which are defined contribution plans.

Combined, the Company and Mr. Zoellner contribute 25% of his base salary to the BVG in accordance with the requirements of the BVG and in accordance with the common practice of similarly situated Swiss companies. The BVG mandates that the employer must pay at least 50% of the mandated minimum contribution on behalf of the employee. Contributions earn a statutory interest rate of two percent (2%) and are paid at retirement by the insurance company that manages the BVG. The participant is eligible to receive the accumulated contributions plus accumulated interest at retirement either in lump sum or monthly payments similar to a life annuity.

We have elected, per Swiss regulations, to offer our employees in Mr. Zoellner’s age category (55 to 65 years of age), a total combined contribution of twenty-five percent (25%) with respect to the first 58,140 Swiss francs earned by the employee. We contribute fifteen percent (15%) to the BVG and Mr. Zoellner contributes ten percent (10%). Under Swiss law, Mr. Zoellner is eligible to make, and has made, catch up contributions to the BVG.

Mr. Zoellner also participates in the SOBP. The SOBP is a defined contribution plan that allows for contributions by the employer, as well as deferral elections by the employee, in excess of those allowed under the BVG. To be eligible to participate in the SOBP, an employee must first have maximized his and his employer’s contributions to the BVG. The table below provides information regarding Mr. Zoellner’s participation in the BVG and SOBP. Since the SOBP chosen by us bases our contribution only on the employee’s base salary and not on total compensation, the employee can make personal contributions up to the maximum limit allowed by the Swiss tax law. During fiscal year 2012, Mr. Zoellner did not make such additional personal contributions.

In fiscal year 2010, we engaged Towers Watson in Zurich to review our Swiss pension plan to determine local competitiveness. Towers Watson found that for most employee age groups, the current Swiss pension plan contributions were competitive; however, Mr. Zoellner’s contributions were generally less than competitive over the last 10 years. Given the Company’s mandatory executive retirement age of 65, unlike other employees, Mr. Zoellner would not have enough future years of employment to make up for the contributions to be competitive. Therefore, the Committee determined that a payment in the amount of 198,935 Swiss francs (equivalent to $207,750 U.S. Dollars based on an exchange rate of .9584 Swiss francs to 1 U.S. Dollar, which was the exchange rate on August 31, 2011) would be made to Mr. Zoellner in fiscal years 2010, 2011 and 2012, provided that Mr. Zoellner remained an employee of the Company. The make-up contribution is not reflected in the table below as it was made directly to Mr. Zoellner and not through the Swiss pension plan.

 

44

---

Table of Contents

The following table and footnotes provide information regarding non-qualified deferred compensation plans during fiscal year 2012 for the NEOs.

FISCAL YEAR 2012 NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION TABLE

 

Name		Executive’s Contribution in Last FY ($)				Registrant’s Contributions in Last FY ($)				Aggregate Earnings (Losses) in Last FY				Aggregate Balance at Last FY
Joseph Alvarado		$	150,000			$	52,224			$	5,298			$	117,152	(4)
Barbara R. Smith		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0
Hanns K. Zoellner(1)		$	83,929	(2)		$	61,097	(3)		$	143,202			$	5,242,812	(5)
Tracy L. Porter		$	75,042			$	33,578			$	49,705			$	819,284	(6)
Ann J. Bruder		$	96,722			$	20,039			$	16,394			$	262,195	(7)
James B. Alleman		$	0			$	0			$	4,387			$	488,349	(8)

 

(1)

The figures in this table represent contributions on the part of Mr. Zoellner and us to both the BVG and SOBP retirement plans. Contributions to Mr. Zoellner’s plan are made in Swiss francs. The conversion rate for fiscal year 2012 is .9584 Swiss francs to 1 U.S. Dollar, which was the exchange rate on August 31, 2012.

 

(2)	Represents Mr. Zoellner’s contributions of $77,756 to the SOBP and $6,173 to the BVG.

 

(3)	Represents Company contributions of $51,837 to the SOBP and $9,259 to the BVG.

 

(4)	Approximately 71% of the aggregate balance at 2012 fiscal year end results from Mr. Alvarado’s voluntary deferrals of compensation to the BRP since his participation began in 2010.

 

(5)	Approximately 40% of the aggregate balance at 2012 fiscal year end results from Mr. Zoellner’s voluntary deferrals of compensation to the SOBP and BVG since his participation began in 1991.

 

(6)	Approximately 60% of the aggregate balance at 2012 fiscal year end results from Mr. Porter’s voluntary deferrals of compensation to the BRP since his participation began in 2006.

 

(7)	Approximately 95% of the aggregate balance at 2012 fiscal year end results from Ms. Bruder’s voluntary deferrals of compensation to the BRP since her participation began in 2008.

 

(8)	Approximately 70% of the aggregate balance at 2012 fiscal year end results from Mr. Alleman’s voluntary deferrals of compensation to the BRP since his participation began in 2007.

Potential Payments and Benefits Upon Termination or Change in Control

Under our executive compensation program, severance payments and the provision of benefits can be triggered upon termination of an NEO’s employment and following a Change in Control. These payments may include payments resulting from the employment agreements and EECAs discussed below. The events that may trigger different severance payments and benefits are classified as follows:

 

•

Voluntary Resignation

 

•

Retirement

 

•

Involuntary Termination Without Cause or Good Reason

 

•

For Cause Termination

 

•

Change in Control With No Termination

 

•

Change in Control With Involuntary or Good Reason Termination

 

•

Permanent Disability

 

•

Death

 

45

---

Table of Contents

Employment Agreements

Below is a description of the termination provisions included in each of the employment agreements and EECAs. The NEOs are also bound under the terms of their employment agreements to certain non-competition provisions during the term of the employment and for eighteen months thereafter and certain non-solicitation restrictions for a period of two years after termination of employment.

Alvarado, Smith, Porter, Bruder and Alleman Agreements.    If we terminate Mr. Alvarado’s, Ms. Smith’s, Mr. Porter’s, Ms. Bruder’s and Mr. Alleman’s employment for cause under the terms of their respective employment agreements or under the applicable law or if either such executive terminates his or her own employment without good reason, then we have no further payment obligations to him or her, except accrued and unused vacation. If such NEO’s employment is terminated due to death or disability, such executive or his or her respective estate shall be entitled to: (i) any applicable life insurance or disability benefits; (ii) a pro-rata share of any applicable bonus as determined by the Board of Directors; (iii) payment of any cash incentive due under the 2006 Cash Plan; (iv) vesting of SARs, restricted stock and/or stock options to the extent permitted by the terms of the applicable equity incentive plan and award or grant agreements; and (v) to the extent permitted by the PS/401(k) Plan and BRP, crediting of any Company contribution attributable to the plan year of the termination and accelerated vesting of any unvested Company contributions to such accounts. If we terminate Mr. Alvarado’s or Mr. Porter’s employment without cause, if Mr. Alvarado or Mr. Porter terminates for good reason, or if we do not renew such NEO’s employment agreement, pursuant to such NEO’s employment agreement, he shall be entitled to: (i) a lump sum payment equal to 1.5 times the executive’s then current annual base salary; (ii) a cash payment in lieu of a bonus equal to the greater of (a) 1.5 times the average annual bonus received by such executive for the five fiscal year period ending with our last completed fiscal year prior to the termination or (b) his annual bonus target as established by the Board of Directors for our last completed fiscal year prior to the termination, the foregoing when combined with (i) not to exceed two times the executive’s then current annual base salary; and (iii) to the extent permitted by the PS/401(k) Plan and BRP, crediting of any Company contribution attributable to the plan year of the termination and accelerated vesting of any unvested Company contributions to such accounts. If we terminate Ms. Smith’s, Ms. Bruder’s or Mr. Alleman’s employment without cause, if the executive terminates for good reason, or if we do not renew the executive’s employment agreement, pursuant to the executive’s employment agreement, the executive will be entitled to: (i) an amount equal to two times the executive’s then current annual base salary; and (ii) to the extent permitted by the PS/401(k) Plan and BRP, crediting of any Company contribution attributable to the plan year of the termination and accelerated vesting of any unvested Company contributions to such accounts.

Under Mr. Alvarado’s, Ms. Smith’s, Mr. Porter’s, Ms. Bruder’s and Mr. Alleman’s employment agreements, “cause” is defined as the executive’s: (i) theft, embezzlement, fraud, financial impropriety, any other act of dishonesty relating to such executive’s employment or any willful violation of Company policies or directives or laws, rule or regulations applicable to the Company; (ii) willful commission of acts that would support the finding of a felony or lesser crime involving fraud, dishonesty, misappropriation or moral turpitude; (iii) failure to perform the duties and obligations under such executive’s employment agreement; or (iv) commission of an act in performing such executive’s duties amounting to gross negligence or willful misconduct. Under Mr. Alvarado’s and Mr. Porter’s employment agreements, “good reason” is defined as our breach of the agreement, a significant reduction in the executive’s responsibilities or compensation, or our requiring the executive to work at a location more than 50 miles from our current location. Under Ms. Smith’s, Ms. Bruder’s and Mr. Alleman’s employment agreement, “good reason” is defined as our breach of the agreement or a significant reduction in the executive’s responsibilities or compensation.

Zoellner Transition and Retirement Agreement.    As noted above, in fiscal year 2012, Mr. Zoellner notified the Company of his intent to retire from all officer and director positions of the Company on June 30, 2012 and his resignation from all positions with the Company on December 31, 2012. In exchange for Mr. Zoellner agreeing to continue to provide transition services to the Company through December 31, 2012 and a release of claims in favor of the Company, the Company and Mr. Zoellner entered into a retirement and transition agreement providing for: (i) continued payment of Mr. Zoellner’s current salary through December 31, 2012, (ii) continued eligibility for an annual cash bonus for fiscal year 2012, (iii) continued health benefits and other perquisites through December 31, 2012, (iv) accelerated vesting on December 31, 2012 of 30,000 PSUs granted

 

46

---

Table of Contents

on June 3, 2010, (v) accelerated vesting on December 31, 2012 of 20,000 RSUs granted on June 3, 2010, (vi) the vesting of 6,752 RSUs of the 14,123 RSUs granted to Mr. Zoellner on January 18, 2011; (vii) eligibility for vesting of 22,598 PSUs of the 31,776 PSUs granted to Mr. Zoellner on January 18, 2011, with actual vesting to be determined based on the Company’s achievement of the performance goals applicable to the PSUs; (viii) eligibility for vesting of 7,397 PSUs of the 20,000 PSUs granted to Mr. Zoellner on November 23, 2011, with actual vesting to be determined based on the Company’s achievement of the performance goals applicable to the PSUs; (ix) severance equal to two times Mr. Zoellner’s current base salary (total severance equal to $1,160,205), payable in 24 monthly installments following Mr. Zoellner’s retirement; (x) a $300,000 cash payment as a supplement to Mr. Zoellner’s reduced fiscal year 2012 long-term equity award; and (xi) Mr. Zoellner’s full supplemental retirement payment of $207,570 for fiscal year 2012.

EECA Agreements.    In April 2006, our Board of Directors authorized the execution of a form Executive Employment Continuity Agreement (the “EECA”) with certain key executives, including each of the NEOs. The EECA is intended to ensure that we will have the continued attention and dedication of the executive during events that might lead to, and in the event of, a Change in Control of the Company. Should a Change in Control occur, we have agreed to continue to employ each executive for a period of two years thereafter (the “Employment Period”). The EECAs terminate two years after a Change in Control.

During the Employment Period, each executive will continue to receive: (i) an annual base salary equal to at least the executive’s base salary before the Change in Control; (ii) cash bonus opportunities equivalent to that available to the executive under our annual and long-term cash incentive plans in effect immediately preceding the Change in Control; and (iii) continued participation in all incentive plans, including equity incentive, savings, deferred compensation, retirement plans, welfare benefit plans and other employee benefits on terms no less favorable than those in effect during the 90-day period immediately preceding the Change in Control.

If the executive’s employment is terminated during the Employment Period for other than cause or disability (including Constructive Termination (as defined below)), the EECA requires us to pay certain severance benefits to the executive in a lump sum within 30 days following termination. The severance benefits for Ms. Smith and Ms. Bruder and Messrs. Alvarado, Zoellner, Porter and Alleman include an amount equal to four times the highest base salary in effect at any time during the twelve month period prior to the Change in Control as well as unpaid salary, vacation pay and certain other amounts considered to have been earned prior to termination. Company contributions to retirement plans and participation, including that of the executive’s eligible dependents, in Company provided welfare plan benefits will be continued for two years following termination. The executive shall become fully vested in all stock incentive awards and all stock options shall remain exercisable for the remainder of their term. The EECA contains a “double trigger” in that there must be present both a Change in Control and a termination of the executive in order to trigger severance payments under these agreements. We believe that this double trigger and the absence of a tax gross-up (as discussed below) is a reasonable trigger for severance compensation under the EECAs and that these agreements provide a mechanism for eliminating the distraction to the executives that is inherent in change in control events.

The EECA does not provide for a “tax gross up” reimbursement payment by us to the executive for taxes, including excise taxes under Section 4999 of the Code, which the employee may owe as a result of receipt of payments under the EECA. The EECA does require us to determine if the payments to an executive under the EECA combined with any other payments or benefits to which the executive may be entitled (in aggregate the “Change in Control Payments”) would result in the imposition on the executive of the excise tax under Section 4999. We will either reduce the Change in Control Payments to the maximum amount which would not result in imposition of the Section 4999 excise tax or pay the entire Change in Control Payment to the executive if, even after the executive’s payment of the Section 4999 excise tax, the executive would receive a larger net amount.

In the event the executive is terminated more than two years following a Change in Control, no severance benefits are provided under the EECA. The EECA provides that the executive not disclose any confidential information relating to us and, for a period of one year following termination of employment, not compete with the business as conducted by the Company within 100 miles of a Company facility nor solicit or hire employees of the Company or knowingly permit (to the extent reasonably within the executive’s control) any business or entity that employs the executive or in which the executive has an ownership interest to hire Company employees. If a court rules that the executive has violated these provisions, the rights of the executive under the EECA will terminate.

 

47

---

Table of Contents

Plan Awards.    In addition to the EECAs, our existing equity incentive plans also provide for accelerated vesting of stock-based awards regardless of whether a termination occurs as a result of a Change in Control, as defined by such plans. Under the Company’s long-term incentive program and except as otherwise provided for in an agreement, PSUs vest at target performance levels upon a Change in Control. Further, the 2006 Cash Plan provides that in the event of a Change in Control, the Committee has discretion to take action to determine the extent to which incentive compensation is considered earned and payable during any performance period, consistent with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code, and further consistent with our best interests.

The EECA, cash and equity incentive plans define a Change in Control to be the occurrence of one of the following events: (i) the acquisition of twenty-five percent (25%) or more of our outstanding voting securities; (ii) the replacement of a majority of the members of the Board of Directors by directors not approved by the incumbents; (iii) the sale of substantially all of our assets to an entity of which we own less than fifty percent (50%) of the voting securities; or (iv) the merger of the Company resulting in the pre-merger stockholders of the Company not controlling at least fifty percent (50%) of the post-merger voting securities. The EECA defines Constructive Termination as the failure to maintain the executive in the position held by him prior to the Change in Control, a material adverse change in the executive’s responsibilities, the failure to pay the amounts due to him under the EECA, or requiring the executive to relocate more than 50 miles from his workplace.

In order to describe the payments and benefits that are triggered for each event, we have created the following tables for each NEO estimating the payments and benefits that would be paid under each element of our compensation program assuming that the NEO’s employment terminated or the Change in Control occurred on August 31, 2012, the last day of our 2012 fiscal year. In all cases the amounts were valued as of August 31, 2012, based upon, where applicable, a closing share price of $12.74.

The amounts in the following tables are calculated as of August 31, 2012 pursuant to SEC rules and are not intended to reflect actual payments that may be made. Actual payments that may be made will be based on the dates and circumstances of the applicable event.

 

Joseph Alvarado Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination		Voluntary Resignation				Retirement (7)				Involuntary Termination Without Cause or Good Reason Termination				For Cause Termination				CIC With No Termination				CIC Involuntary or Good Reason Termination				Permanent Disability				Death
Termination Compensation:
Base Salary(1)		$	0			$	0			$	1,125,000			$	0			$	0			$	3,000,000			$	0			$	0
Annual Cash Incentive Bonus(1)		$	0			$	0			$	375,000			$	0			$	623,200			$	623,200			$	623,200			$	623,200
Long-term Incentives
Restricted Stock/PSUs
Unvested and accelerated(2)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	3,491,677			$	3,491,677			$	1,577,836			$	1,577,836
Stock Options/SARs Unvested and accelerated(2)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	129,433			$	129,433			$	25,000			$	25,000
Benefits and Perquisites:
BRP, 401(k) and Profit Sharing Contributions(3)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	1,274,740			$	0			$	0
Welfare Continuation Benefit(4)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	57,258			$	0			$	0
Life Insurance Proceeds		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	1,000,000
Disability Benefits(5)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	590,000			$	0
Accrued Vacation Pay(6)		$	57,692			$	57,692			$	57,692			$	57,692			$	0			$	57,692			$	57,692			$	57,692
Total		$	57,692			$	57,692			$	1,557,692			$	57,692			$	4,244,310			$	8,634,000			$	2,873,729			$	3,283,729

 

48

---

Table of Contents

 

(1)	Amounts reported for base salary and bonus are calculated pursuant to Mr. Alvarado’s employment agreement and EECA described on pages 46 and 47. As noted in footnote 7 below, Mr. Alvarado is not eligible for ordinary retirement.

 

(2)

Pursuant to the terms of the grant agreements, awards granted in fiscal year 2010 automatically vest 100% upon death, permanent disability, or a Change in Control, and subject to consent of the Committee, vest following retirement or permitted early retirement. Awards granted in fiscal years 2011 and 2012 vest pro rata upon death, permanent disability or following retirement or permitted early retirement (subject to consent of the Committee) and vest 100% upon a Change in Control.

 

(3)	Amounts reported represent a calculation of employer contributions to the 401(k) and BRP plans for two years based on the amounts received under the terms of the EECA.

 

(4)	Amounts reported are based on estimated costs for two years based upon 2013 premiums and actual fiscal year 2012 coverage.

 

(5)	Represents the aggregate value of permanent disability benefits to be paid in monthly installments until executive is age 65.

 

(6)	As required by state law and our vacation program, we will pay any earned but unused vacation pay after termination of employment for any reason. Amount shown assumes the executive is entitled to the full annual vacation benefit at termination.

 

(7)	Mr. Alvarado is not eligible for ordinary retirement based on his length of service with the Company.

 

Barbara R. Smith Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination		Voluntary Resignation				Retirement (7)				Involuntary Termination Without Cause or Good Reason Termination				For Cause Termination				CIC With No Termination				CIC Involuntary or Good Reason Termination				Permanent Disability				Death
Termination Compensation:
Base Salary(1)		$	0			$	0			$	950,000			$	0			$	0			$	1,900,000			$	0			$	0
Annual Cash Incentive Bonus(1)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	292,000			$	292,000			$	292,000			$	292,000
Long-term Incentives Restricted Stock/PSUs
Unvested and Accelerated(2)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	1,058,019			$	1,058,019			$	249,908			$	249,908
Stock Options/SARs Unvested and accelerated(2)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	42,563			$	42,563			$	8,221			$	8,221
Benefits and Perquisites:
BRP, 401(k) and Profit Sharing Contributions(3)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	603,509			$	0			$	0
Welfare Continuation Benefit(4)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	54,112			$	0			$	0
Life Insurance Proceeds		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	950,000
Disability Benefits(5)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	1,900,000			$	0
Accrued Vacation Pay(6)		$	36,538			$	36,538			$	36,538			$	36,538			$	0			$	36,538			$	36,538			$	36,538
Total		$	36,538			$	36,538			$	986,538			$	36,538			$	1,392,582			$	3,986,741			$	2,486,667			$	1,536,667

 

(1)	Amounts reported for base salary are calculated pursuant to Ms. Smith’s employment agreement and EECA described on pages 46 and 47. As noted in footnote 7 below, Ms. Smith is not eligible for ordinary retirement.

 

(2)	Pursuant to the terms of the grant agreements, awards granted in fiscal years 2011 and 2012 vest pro rata upon death, permanent disability or following retirement or permitted early retirement (subject to consent of the Committee) and vest 100% upon a Change in Control.

 

(3)	Amounts reported represent a calculation of employer contributions to the 401(k) and BRP plans for two years based on the amounts received under the terms of the EECA.

 

49

---

Table of Contents

(4)	Amounts reported are based on estimated costs for two years based upon 2013 premiums and actual fiscal year 2012 coverage.

 

(5)	Represents the aggregate value of permanent disability benefits to be paid in monthly installments until executive is age 65.

 

(6)	As required by state law and our vacation program, we will pay any earned but unused vacation pay after termination of employment for any reason. Amount shown assumes the executive is entitled to the full annual vacation benefit at termination.

 

(7)	Ms. Smith is not eligible for ordinary retirement based on her length of service with the Company.

 

Hanns Zoellner Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination		Voluntary Resignation				Retirement (6)				Involuntary Termination Without Cause or Good Reason Termination (6)				For Cause Termination				CIC With No Termination				CIC Involuntary or Good Reason Termination				Permanent Disability				Death
Termination Compensation:
Base Salary(1)		$	0			$	1,160,205			$	1,160,205			$	0			$	0			$	2,320,409			$	0			$	0
Annual Cash Incentive Bonus(1)		$	0			$	249,323			$	249,323			$	0			$	249,323			$	249,323			$	249,323			$	249,323
Long-term Incentives Restricted Stock/PSUs Unvested and Accelerated(2)		$	1,296,625			$	1,296,625			$	1,296,625			$	0			$	1,776,553			$	1,776,553			$	1,296,625			$	1,296,625
Stock Options/SARs Unvested and accelerated(2)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0
Benefits and Perquisites:
BRP, 401(k) and Profit Sharing Contributions(3)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	766,619			$	0			$	0
Pension Make-Up Contribution		$	0			$	207,570			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0
Welfare Continuation Benefit		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0
Life Insurance Proceeds		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	374,778
Disability Benefits(4)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	780,309			$	0
Accrued Vacation Pay(5)		$	44,623			$	44,623			$	44,623			$	44,623			$	44,623			$	44,623			$	44,623			$	44,623
Total		$	1,341,248			$	2,958,345			$	2,750,775			$	44,623			$	2,025,876			$	5,157,527			$	2,370,880			$	1,965,349

 

(1)

The 2006 Cash Plan provides for the full incentive amount to be payable to the participant in the event of death or permanent disability and a pro-rata portion upon retirement. The amounts shown are calculated on the basis of the recipient’s actual 2012 Annual Cash Incentive Bonus and assume no pro-rata amount is due for retirement on August 31, 2012. Amounts reported for base salary and bonus are calculated pursuant to Mr. Zoellner’s retirement agreement and EECA described on pages 46 and 47.

 

(2)

Pursuant to the terms of the grant agreements, awards granted in fiscal year 2010 automatically vest 100% upon death, permanent disability, or a Change in Control, and subject to consent of the Committee, vest following retirement or permitted early retirement. Awards granted in fiscal years 2011 and 2012 vest pro rata upon death, permanent disability or following retirement or permitted early retirement (subject to consent of the Committee) and vest 100% upon a Change in Control. We have assumed that except for termination with cause, the Committee would have consented to vesting of awards upon retirement or permitted early retirement.

 

(3)	Amounts reported represent a calculation of employer contributions to the 401(k) and BRP plans for two years based on the amounts received under the terms of the EECA.

 

(4)	Represents the aggregate value of permanent disability benefits to be paid in monthly installments until executive is age 65.

 

50

---

Table of Contents

(5)	As required by state law and our vacation program, we will pay any earned but unused vacation pay after termination of employment for any reason. Amount shown assumes the executive is entitled to the full annual vacation benefit at termination.

 

(6)	Represents amounts that Mr. Zoellner would receive pursuant to the terms of his Retirement and Transition Agreement, which is discussed in the narrative preceding these tables.

 

Tracy L. Porter Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination		Voluntary Resignation				Retirement				Involuntary Termination Without Cause or Good Reason Termination				For Cause Termination				CIC With No Termination				CIC Involuntary or Good Reason Termination				Permanent Disability				Death
Termination Compensation:
Base Salary(1)		$	0			$	0			$	750,000			$	0			$	0			$	2,000,000			$	0			$	0
Annual Cash Incentive Bonus(1)		$	0			$	0			$	250,000			$	0			$	449,300			$	449,300			$	449,300			$	449,300
Long-term Incentives Restricted Stock/PSUs Unvested and Accelerated(2)		$	868,244			$	868,244			$	868,244			$	0			$	1,528,838			$	1,528,838			$	868,244			$	868,244
Stock Options/SARs Unvested and accelerated(2)		$	8,654			$	8,654			$	8,654			$	0			$	44,803			$	44,803			$	8,654			$	8,654
Benefits and Perquisites:
BRP, 401(k) and Profit Sharing Contributions(3)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	718,727			$	0			$	0
Welfare Continuation Benefit(4)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	43,611			$	0			$	0
Life Insurance Proceeds		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	1,000,000
Disability Benefits(5)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	1,200,000			$	0
Accrued Vacation Pay(6)		$	38,462			$	38,462			$	38,462			$	38,462			$	0			$	38,462			$	38,462			$	38,462
Total		$	915,359			$	915,359			$	1,915,359			$	38,462			$	2,022,941			$	4,823,741			$	2,564,659			$	2,364,659

 

(1)

The 2006 Cash Plan provides for the full incentive amount to be payable to the participant in the event of death or permanent disability and a pro-rata portion upon retirement. The amounts shown are calculated on the basis of the recipient’s actual 2012 Annual Cash Incentive Bonus and assume no pro-rata amount is due for retirement on August 31, 2012. Amounts reported for base salary and bonus are calculated pursuant to Mr. Porter’s employment agreement and EECA described on pages 46 and 47.

 

(2)

Pursuant to the terms of the grant agreements, awards granted in fiscal year 2010 automatically vest 100% upon death, permanent disability, or a Change in Control, and subject to consent of the Committee, vest following retirement or permitted early retirement. Awards granted in fiscal years 2011 and 2012 vest pro rata upon death, permanent disability or following retirement or permitted early retirement (subject to consent of the Committee) and vest 100% upon a Change in Control. We have assumed that except for termination with cause, the Committee would have consented to vesting of awards upon retirement or permitted early retirement.

 

(3)	Amounts reported represent a calculation of employer contributions to the 401(k) and BRP plans for two years based on the amounts received under the terms of the EECA.

 

(4)	Amounts reported are based on estimated costs for two years based upon 2013 premiums and actual fiscal year 2012 coverage.

 

(5)	Represents the aggregate value of permanent disability benefits to be paid in monthly installments until executive is age 65.

 

(6)	As required by state law and our vacation program, we will pay any earned but unused vacation pay after termination of employment for any reason. Amount shown assumes the executive is entitled to the full annual vacation benefit at termination.

 

51

---

Table of Contents

Ann J. Bruder Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination		Voluntary Resignation				Retirement (7)				Involuntary Termination Without Cause or Good Reason Termination				For Cause Termination				CIC With No Termination				CIC Involuntary or Good Reason Termination				Permanent Disability				Death
Termination Compensation:
Base Salary(1)		$	0			$	0			$	800,000			$	0			$	0			$	1,600,000			$	0			$	0
Annual Cash Incentive Bonus(1)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	199,400			$	199,400			$	199,400			$	199,400
Long-term Incentives Restricted Stock Unvested and Accelerated(2)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	1,241,488			$	1,241,488			$	772,464			$	772,464
Stock Options/SARs Unvested and accelerated(2)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	35,843			$	35,843			$	6,923			$	6,923
Benefits and Perquisites:
BRP, 401(k) and Profit Sharing Contributions(3)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	553,827			$	0			$	0
Welfare Continuation Benefit(4)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	32,155			$	0			$	0
Life Insurance Proceeds		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	800,000
Disability Benefits(5)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	2,160,000			$	0
Accrued Vacation Pay(6)		$	30,769			$	30,769			$	30,769			$	30,769			$	0			$	30,769			$	30,769			$	30,769
Total		$	30,769			$	30,769			$	830,769			$	30,769			$	1,476,730			$	3,693,481			$	3,169,557			$	1,809,557

 

(1)	Amounts reported for base salary are calculated pursuant to Ms. Bruder’s employment agreement and EECA described on pages 46 and 47. As noted in footnote 7 below, Ms. Bruder is not eligible for ordinary retirement.

 

(2)

Pursuant to the terms of the grant agreement, awards granted in fiscal year 2010 automatically vest 100% upon death, permanent disability, or a Change in Control and, subject to the consent of the Committee, vest following permitted early retirement. Pursuant to the terms of the grant agreements, awards granted in fiscal years 2011 and 2012 vest pro rata upon death, permanent disability or following retirement or permitted early retirement (subject to consent of the Committee) and vest 100% upon a Change in Control.

 

(3)	Amounts reported represent a calculation of employer contributions to the 401(k) and BRP plans for two years based on the amounts received under the terms of the EECA.

 

(4)	Amounts reported are based on estimated costs for two years based upon 2013 premiums and actual fiscal year 2012 coverage.

 

(5)	Represents the aggregate value of permanent disability benefits to be paid in monthly installments until executive is age 65.

 

(6)	As required by state law and our vacation program, we will pay any earned but unused vacation pay after termination of employment for any reason. Amount shown assumes the executive is entitled to the full annual vacation benefit at termination.

 

(7)	Ms. Bruder is not eligible for ordinary retirement based on her length of service with the Company.

 

52

---

Table of Contents

James B. Alleman Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination		Voluntary Resignation				Retirement (7)				Involuntary Termination Without Cause or Good Reason Termination				For Cause Termination				CIC With No Termination				CIC Involuntary or Good Reason Termination				Permanent Disability				Death
Termination Compensation:
Base Salary(1)		$	0			$	0			$	693,000			$	0			$	0			$	1,386,000			$	0			$	0
Annual Cash Incentive Bonus(1)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	172,700			$	172,700			$	172,700			$	172,700
Long-term Incentives Restricted Stock Unvested and Accelerated(2)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	1,132,191			$	1,132,191			$	723,339			$	723,339
Stock Options/SARs Unvested and accelerated(2)		$	0			$	0			$	0			$	0			$	31,049			$	31,049			$	5,998			$	5,998
Benefits and Perquisites:																															<