Note 1 - Basis of Presentation

The Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). In the opinion of Bryn Mawr Bank Corporation’s (the “Corporation”) management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position and the results of operations for the interim periods presented have been included. These Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 (the “2017 Annual Report”).

The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Principles of Consolidation

The Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries; the Corporation’s primary subsidiary is the Bank. In connection with the RBPI Merger (defined in Note 3 – Business Combinations below), the Corporation acquired two Delaware trusts, Royal Bancshares Capital Trust I and Royal Bancshares Capital Trust II. These two entities are not consolidated per requirements under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 810, “Consolidation” (“ASC Topic 810”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current-year presentation.

Note 2 - Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The following Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Updates ("ASUs") are divided into pronouncements which have been adopted by the Corporation since January 1, 2018, and those which are not yet effective and have been evaluated or are currently being evaluated by management as of March 31, 2018.

Adopted Pronouncements:

FASB ASU 2014-09 (Topic 606), “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”

The Corporation adopted ASU 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers and all subsequent amendments to the ASU (collectively, “ASC 606”), which (i) creates a single framework for recognizing revenue from contracts with customers that fall within its scope and (ii) revises when it is appropriate to recognize a gain (loss) from the transfer of nonfinancial assets, such as other real estate owned (“OREO”). The majority of the Corporation’s revenues come from interest income and other sources, including loans, leases, investment securities and derivatives, that are outside the scope of ASC 606. The Corporation’s services that fall within the scope of ASC 606 are presented within noninterest income and are recognized as revenue as the Corporation satisfies its obligation to the customer. Services within the scope of ASC 606 include service charges on deposits, interchange income, wealth management fees, investment brokerage fees, and the net gain on sale of OREO. Refer to Note 17 Revenue from Contracts with Customers for further discussion on the Corporation’s accounting policies for revenue sources within the scope of ASC 606. The adoption of this ASU did not have an impact to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

FASB ASU 2017-01 (Topic 805), “Business Combinations”

The Corporation adopted ASU 2017-01, which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill, and consolidation. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.

FASB ASU 2016-15 (Topic 320), “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments”

The Corporation adopted ASU 2016-15, which provides guidance on eight specific cash flow issues and their disclosure in the consolidated statements of cash flows. The issues addressed include debt prepayment, settlement of zero-coupon debt, contingent consideration in business combinations, proceeds from settlement of insurance claims, proceeds from settlement of BOLI, distributions received from equity method investees, beneficial interests in securitization transactions, and separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.

FASB ASU 2016-01 (Subtopic 825-10), “Financial Instruments – Overall, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”

The Corporation adopted ASU 2016-01 which requires that equity investments be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. The Corporation’s equity investments with a readily determinable fair value are currently included within trading securities and are measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. In connection with the adoption of this ASU, the Corporation elected the practicability exception to fair value measurement for investments in equity securities without a readily determinable fair value (other than our FHLB, FRB, and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank stock, which are outside of the scope of this ASU). Under the practicability exception, the investments are measured at cost, less impairment, plus or minus observable price changes (in orderly transactions) of an identical or similar investment of the same issuer. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

FASB ASU 2017-07 – Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): “Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost”

On January 1, 2018, the Corporation adopted ASU 2017-07 and all subsequent amendments to the ASU, which requires that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations, if one is presented. If a separate line item or items are used to present the other components of net benefit cost, that line item or items must be appropriately described. If a separate line item or items are not used, the line item or items used in the income statement to present the other components of net benefit cost must be disclosed. The amendments in this update also allow only the service cost component to be eligible for capitalization when applicable (for example, as a cost of internally manufactured inventory or a self-constructed asset).

Upon adoption, the components of net periodic benefit cost other than the service cost component were reclassified retrospectively from “Employee benefits” to “Other operating expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Since both “Employee benefits” and “Other operating expenses” line items of these income statement line items are within “Non-interest expenses”, there was no impact to total “Non-interest expenses” or “Net income.” The components of net periodic benefit cost are currently disclosed in Note 17 – “Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements found in our 2017 Annual Report. Additionally, the Corporation does not currently capitalize any components of its net periodic benefit costs. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.

Pronouncements Not Yet Effective:

FASB ASU 2017-04 (Topic 350), “Intangibles – Goodwill and Others”

Issued in January 2017, ASU 2017-04 simplifies how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Step 2 measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. ASU 2017-04 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019 including interim periods within those periods. Management does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.

FASB ASU 2016-13 (Topic 326), “Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”

Issued in June 2016, ASU 2016-13 significantly changes how companies measure and recognize credit impairment for many financial assets. The new current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model will require companies to immediately recognize an estimate of credit losses expected to occur over the remaining life of the financial assets that are in the scope of the standard. The ASU also makes targeted amendments to the current impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities. ASU 2016-13 is effective for the annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. Adoption of this new guidance can be applied only on a prospective basis as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings.

It is expected that the new model will include different assumptions used in calculating credit losses, such as estimating losses over the estimated life of a financial asset, and will consider expected future changes in macroeconomic conditions. The adoption of this ASU may result in an increase to the Corporation’s allowance for credit losses, which will depend upon the nature and characteristics of the Corporation 's portfolio at the adoption date, as well as the macroeconomic conditions and forecasts at the adoption date. The Corporation has engaged the services of a third-party consultant as well as invested in software designed to assist management in the development and implementation of the new CECL model. Management is currently in the process of validating historical data uploaded within the third-party software to replicate the current ALLL model. The adoption of this ASU will also require the addition of an allowance for held-to-maturity debt securities. The Corporation currently does not intend to early adopt this new guidance.

FASB ASU 2016-02 (Topic 842), “Leases”

Issued in February 2016, ASU 2016-02 revises the accounting related to lessee accounting. Under the new guidance, lessees will be required to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. The new lease guidance also simplifies the accounting for sale and leaseback transactions primarily because lessees must recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. ASU 2016-02 is effective for the first interim period within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The standard is required to be adopted using the modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. Management has begun to inventory the Corporation’s various leases and is currently computing the lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. Management is aware that the adoption of this ASU will impact the Corporation’s balance sheet for the recording of assets and liabilities for operating leases. Any additional assets recorded as a result of implementation will have a negative impact on the Corporation and Bank capital ratios under current regulatory guidance.

Note 3 - Business Combinations

Royal Bancshares of Pennsylvania, Inc.

On December 15, 2017, the previously announced merger of Royal Bancshares of Pennsylvania, Inc. (“RBPI”) with and into the Corporation (the “RBPI Merger”), and the merger of Royal Bank America with and into the Bank, as contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger, by and between RBPI and the Corporation, dated as of January 30, 2017 (the “Agreement”) were completed. In accordance with the Agreement, the aggregate share consideration paid to RBPI shareholders consisted of 3,098,754 shares of the Corporation’s common stock. Shareholders of RBPI received 0.1025 shares of Corporation common stock for each share of RBPI Class A common stock and 0.1179 shares of Corporation common stock for each share of RBPI Class B common stock owned as of the effective date of the RBPI Merger, with cash-in-lieu of fractional shares totaling $7 thousand. Holders of in-the-money options to purchase RBPI Class A common stock received cash totaling $112 thousand. In addition, 1,368,040 warrants to purchase Class A common stock of RBPI, valued at $1.9 million, were converted to 140,224 warrants to purchase Corporation common stock. In accordance with the acquisition method of accounting, assets acquired and liabilities assumed were preliminarily adjusted to their fair values as of the date of the RBPI Merger. The excess of consideration paid above the fair value of net assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. This goodwill is not amortizable nor is it deductible for income tax purposes.

In connection with the RBPI Merger, the consideration paid and the estimated fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of the RBPI Merger, which include the effects of any measurement period adjustments in accordance with ASC 805-10, are summarized in the following table:

Provisional Estimates of Fair Value of Certain Assets Acquired in the RBPI Merger

As of March 31, 2018, the accounting for the estimates of fair value for certain loans acquired in the RBPI Merger is incomplete. The Corporation is in the process of obtaining new information that will allow management to better estimate fair values that existed as of December 15, 2017. When this information is obtained, management anticipates an adjustment to the provisional fair value assigned to certain acquired loans. These adjustments will result in corresponding adjustments to goodwill and net deferred tax asset. In accordance with ASC 805-10, the adjustments will be recorded in the period in which the new information about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date is obtained and reviewed.

During the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Corporation adjusted certain provisional fair value estimates related to the RBPI Merger. The following table details the changes in fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of December 15, 2017 from the amounts originally reported in the Corporation’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017:

Methods Used to Fair Value Assets and Liabilities

For information regarding the valuation methodologies used to estimate the fair values of major categories of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, refer to Note 2 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2017 Annual Report.

Loans held for investment

During the three months ended March 31, 2018, new information became available related to certain loans acquired from RBPI. This new information resulted in an adjustment to the fair value mark applied to the acquired loan portfolio. Adjustments were made to the fair value of loans acquired with evidence of credit quality deterioration. Loans meeting this definition were reviewed by comparing the contractual cash flows to expected collectible cash flows. The aggregate expected cash flows less the acquisition date fair value results in an accretable yield amount. The accretable yield amount will be recognized over the life of the loans or over the recovery period of the underlying collateral on a level yield basis as an adjustment to yield. As a result of the adjustments, the Corporation recorded a $3.0 million increase in nonaccretable difference. The adjustment to the aggregate expected cash flows less the acquisition date fair value resulted in an increase in accretable yield of $207 thousand.

The following table provides an updated summary of the acquired impaired loans and leases as of December 15, 2017, which include the effects of any measurement period adjustments in accordance with ASC 805-10, resulting from the RBPI Merger:

Harry R. Hirshorn & Company, Inc., d/b/a Hirshorn Boothby (“Hirshorn”)

The acquisition of Hirshorn, an insurance agency headquartered in the Chestnut Hill section of Philadelphia, was completed on May 24, 2017. Immediately after the acquisition, Hirshorn was merged into the Bank’s existing insurance subsidiary, BMT Insurance Advisors, Inc., formerly known as Powers Craft Parker and Beard, Inc (“PCPB”). The consideration paid by the Bank was $7.5 million, of which $5.8 million was paid at closing, with three contingent cash payments, not to exceed $575 thousand each, to be payable on each of May 24, 2018, May 24, 2019, and May 24, 2020, subject to the attainment of certain targets during the related periods. The acquisition enhanced the Bank’s ability to offer comprehensive insurance solutions to both individual and business clients and continues the strategy of selectively establishing specialty offices in targeted areas.

In connection with the Hirshorn acquisition, the following table details the consideration paid, the initial estimated fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of acquisition and the resulting goodwill recorded:

As of December 31, 2017, the estimates of the fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Hirshorn acquisition were final.

Pro Forma Income Statements (unaudited)

The following table presents the pro forma income statement of the combined institution (RBPI and the Corporation) for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as if the RBPI Merger had occurred on January 1, 2017. The pro forma income statement adjustments are limited to the effects of purchase accounting fair value mark amortization and accretion and intangible asset amortization. No cost savings or additional merger expenses have been included in the pro forma income statement. Due to the immaterial contribution to net income of the Hirshorn acquisition, which occurred during the year shown in the table, the pro forma effects of the Hirshorn acquisition have been excluded.

* Total non-interest expense includes RBPI Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest and Preferred Stock Series A Accumulated Dividend and Accretion for pro forma presentation.

** Assumes that the shares of RBPI common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2017 were outstanding for the full three month period ended March 31, 2017.

Due Diligence, Merger-Related and Merger Integration Expenses

Due diligence, merger-related and merger integration expenses include consultant costs, investment banker fees, contract breakage fees, retention bonuses for severed employees, salary and wages for redundant staffing involved in the integration of the institutions and bonus accruals for members of the merger integration team. The following table details the costs identified and classified as due diligence, merger-related and merger integration costs for the periods indicated:

(1) Total due diligence, merger-related and merger integration expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2017 were primarily related to the acquisition of Hirshorn.

Note 4 - Investment Securities

The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities available for sale as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are as follows:

As of March 31, 2018

As of December 31, 2017

The following tables present the aggregate amount of gross unrealized losses as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 on available for sale investment securities classified according to the amount of time those securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:

As of March 31, 2018

As of December 31, 2017

Management evaluates the Corporation’s investment securities that are in an unrealized loss position in order to determine if the decline in fair value is other than temporary. The investment portfolio includes debt securities issued by U.S. government agencies, U.S. government-sponsored agencies, state and local municipalities and other issuers. All fixed income investment securities in the Corporation’s investment portfolio are rated as investment-grade or higher. Factors considered in the evaluation include the current economic climate, the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been below cost, interest rates and the bond rating of each security. The unrealized losses presented in the tables above are temporary in nature and are primarily related to market interest rates rather than the underlying credit quality of the issuers or collateral. Management does not believe that these unrealized losses are other-than-temporary. Management does not have the intent to sell these securities prior to their maturity or the recovery of their cost bases and believes that it is more likely than not that it will not have to sell these securities prior to their maturity or the recovery of their cost bases.

As of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, securities having a fair value of $121.6 million and $126.2 million, respectively, were specifically pledged as collateral for public funds, trust deposits, the FRB discount window program, Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (“FHLB”) borrowings and other purposes. The FHLB has a blanket lien on non-pledged, mortgage-related loans and securities as part of the Corporation’s borrowing agreement with the FHLB.

The amortized cost and fair value of available for sale investment and mortgage-related securities available for sale as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities as borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

⁽¹⁾ Expected maturities of mortgage-related securities may differ from contractual maturities as borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities held to maturity as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are as follows:

As of March 31, 2018

As of December 31, 2017

The following tables present the aggregate amount of gross unrealized losses as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 on held to maturity securities classified according to the amount of time those securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:

As of March 31, 2018

As of December 31, 2017

The amortized cost and fair value of held to maturity investment securities as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, by contractual maturity, are shown below:

⁽¹⁾ Expected maturities of mortgage-related securities may differ from contractual maturities as borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

As of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Corporation’s investment securities held in trading accounts totaled $8.2 million and $4.6 million, respectively, and consisted of deferred compensation trust accounts which are invested in listed mutual funds whose diversification is at the discretion of the deferred compensation plan participants and, as of March 31, 2018, a rabbi trust account established to fund certain unqualified pension obligations. Investment securities held in trading accounts are reported at fair value, with adjustments in fair value reported through income.

Note 5 - Loans and Leases

The loan and lease portfolio consists of loans and leases originated by the Corporation, as well as loans acquired in mergers and acquisitions. These mergers and acquisitions include the  December 2017 RBPI Merger, the  January 2015 Continental Bank Holdings, Inc. Merger, the  November 2012 transaction with First Bank of Delaware, and the  July 2010 acquisition of First Keystone Financial, Inc. Certain tables in this footnote are presented with a breakdown between originated and acquired loans and leases.

A. The table below details portfolio loans and leases as of the dates indicated:

B. Components of the net investment in leases are detailed as follows:

C. Non-Performing Loans and Leases⁽¹⁾

⁽¹⁾ Purchased credit-impaired loans, which have been recorded at their fair values at acquisition, and which are performing, are excluded from this table, with the exception of $107 thousand and $167 thousand of purchased credit-impaired loans as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, which became non-performing subsequent to acquisition.

D. Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans

The outstanding principal balance and related carrying amount of purchased credit-impaired loans, for which the Corporation applies ASC 310-30, Accounting for Purchased Loans with Deteriorated Credit Quality, to account for the interest earned, as of the dates indicated, are as follows:

⁽¹⁾ Includes $109 thousand and $173 thousand of purchased credit-impaired loans as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, for which the Corporation could not estimate the timing or amount of expected cash flows to be collected at acquisition, and for which no accretable yield is recognized. Additionally, the table above includes $107 thousand and $167 thousand of purchased credit-impaired loans as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, which became non-performing subsequent to acquisition, which are disclosed in Note 5C, above, and which also have no accretable yield.

The following table presents changes in the accretable discount on purchased credit-impaired loans, for which the Corporation applies ASC 310-30, for the three months ended March 31, 2018:

E. Age Analysis of Past Due Loans and Leases

The following tables present an aging of all portfolio loans and leases as of the dates indicated: