MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

Juniper Business Plaza, 3499 Route 9 North, Suite 3-C

Freehold, New Jersey 07728


NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


APRIL 27, 2006



Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders (Annual Meeting) of Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation (the Company) will be held Thursday, April 27, 2006, at 4:00 p.m. at the offices of the Company at Juniper Business Plaza, 3499 Route 9 North, Suite 3-C, Freehold, New Jersey, for the following purposes:


1.

To elect three Directors, the names of whom are set forth in the accompanying Proxy Statement, to serve for a three-year term;


2.

To approve the selection by the Board of Directors of the appointment of Reznick Group, P.C. as Independent Auditors for the Company for the year ending September 30, 2006; and


3.

To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment thereof.


The books containing the minutes of the last Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and the minutes of all meetings of the Directors since the last Annual Meeting of Shareholders, will be presented at the Annual Meeting for the inspection of the shareholders.  Only shareholders of record at the close of business on March 14, 2006 will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and at any adjournments thereof.

IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO BE PRESENT IN PERSON, PLEASE SIGN AND DATE THE ENCLOSED PROXY WHICH IS BEING SOLICITED BY THE  BOARD OF DIRECTORS, AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS



EUGENE W. LANDY

   PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR

March 23, 2006



1





MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

Juniper Business Plaza

3499 Route 9 North, Suite 3-C

Freehold, New Jersey 07728

__________


PROXY STATEMENT

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

APRIL 27, 2006

__________


SOLICITATION AND REVOCATION OF PROXIES


This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation (the Company) of proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on April 27, 2006, and at any adjournments thereof, for the purposes listed in the preceding Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders.  This Proxy Statement and the accompanying Proxy card are being distributed on or about March 23, 2006 to shareholders of record on March 14, 2006.

A copy of the Annual Report, including financial statements, was mailed to all shareholders of record on or about February 3, 2006.

Any shareholder giving the accompanying proxy has the power to revoke it at any time before it is exercised at the Annual Meeting by filing with the Secretary of the Company an instrument revoking it, by delivering a duly executed proxy card bearing a later date, or by appearing at the meeting and voting in person.  Shares represented by properly executed proxies will be voted as specified thereon by the shareholder.  Unless the shareholder specifies otherwise, such proxies will be voted FOR the proposals set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting.

The cost of preparing, assembling and mailing this Proxy Statement and form of proxy, and the cost of soliciting the proxies related to the Annual Meeting will be borne by the Company.  The Company does not intend to solicit proxies otherwise than by use of the mail, but certain officers and regular employees of the Company, without additional compensation, may use their personal efforts, by telephone or otherwise, to obtain proxies.

VOTING RIGHTS

Only holders of the Company’s $.01 par value common stock (Common Stock) of record  as of the close of business on March 14, 2006, are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.  As of the record date, there were issued and outstanding 19,434,288 shares of Common Stock, each share being entitled to one vote on any matter which may properly come before the Annual Meeting.  Said voting right is non-cumulative.  The holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock shall constitute a quorum.  An affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of the Common Stock is required for approval of Proposals 1 and 2.




2




PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Three persons have been nominated by the Nominating Committee to serve on the Board of Directors of the Company.  Your proxy will be voted for the election of the three nominees named in this proxy statement, all of whom are members of the present Board of Directors, to serve for a three-year term, unless you specifically withhold your authority.  All nominees have agreed to serve, if elected, for the new term.  If for any reason any of the three nominees becomes unavailable for election, your proxy will be voted for any substitute nominee who may be selected by the Board of Directors prior to or at the meeting, or, if no substitute is selected by the Board of Directors, for a motion to reduce the membership of the Board of Directors to the number of the nominees who are available to serve.  In the event the membership of the Board of Directors is reduced, it is anticipated that it would be restored to the original number at the next annual meeting.  In the event a vacancy occurs on the Board of Directors after the Annual Meeting, the Company’s Bylaws provide that any such vacancy will be filled for the unexpired term only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining Directors in office.  The Company has no knowledge that any of the three nominees will become unavailable for election.


The proxies solicited cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the nominees named.


Eugene W. Landy, a nominee for director, is also a director of Monmouth Capital Corporation and Chairman of the Board of United Mobile Homes, Inc., publicly-owned affiliates of the Company.  Samuel A. Landy, a nominee for director, is also a director of United Mobile Homes, Inc., a publicly-owned affiliate of the Company.  In addition, the Officers and Directors of the Company may engage in real estate transactions for their own account, which transactions may also be suitable for the Company.  In most respects, the activities of the Company, United Mobile Homes, Inc., and Monmouth Capital Corporation are not in conflict, but rather complement each other.  However, the activities of the Officers and Directors of the Company on behalf of the other companies, or for their own account, may on occasion conflict with those of the Company and deprive the Company of favorable opportunities.  It is the opinion of the Officers and Directors of the Company that there have been no conflicting transactions since the beginning of the last fiscal year.



3





The following table sets forth information regarding the Directors standing for election and Directors whose terms continue beyond the Annual Meeting:




Nominee



Age

Present Position with the Company; Business

Experience During Past Five Years; Other

                          Directorships                              


Director
  Since  


DIRECTORS STANDING FOR ELECTION


Eugene W. Landy


72

President (1968 to present) and Director.  Attorney at Law; President and Director (1961 to present) of Monmouth Capital Corporation, an affiliate of the Company; Chairman of the Board (1995 to present), President (1969 to 1995) and Director (1969 to present) of United Mobile Homes, Inc., an affiliate of the Company.

1968

Samuel A. Landy

45

Director.  Attorney at Law (1985 to present); President (1995 to present), Vice President (1991 to 1995) and Director (1992 to present) of United Mobile Homes, Inc., an affiliate of the Company; Director (1994 to 2004) of Monmouth Capital Corporation, an affiliate of the Company.

1989

Peter J. Weidhorn

59

Director. Investor; Director (2000-2003) of real estate management/acquisitions at Kushner Companies; Chairman of the Board, President/CEO (1998-2000) of WNY Group, Inc., a real estate investment trust that owned and operated 8,000 apartments prior to its sale to the Kushner Companies; Director (2001 to present) of BNP Residential Properties, Inc.; Director (2003-present) of The Community Development Trust, Inc.;  Trustee of the CentraState Healthcare Foundation, Inc; and Vice Chairman and Trustee of the Union for Reform Judaism.

2001




4





DIRECTORS WHOSE TERMS EXPIRE IN 2007




Nominee



Age

Present Position with the Company; Business

Experience During Past Five Years; Other

                          Directorships                              


Director
  Since  


 

Daniel D. Cronheim













51

Director.  Attorney at Law (1982 to present); Executive Vice President (1989 to present) and General Counsel (1983 to present) of David Cronheim Company; President (1997 to present) of David Cronheim Mortgage Company; President (2000 to present) of Cronheim Management Services, Inc.; and Director (2000 to present) of Hilltop Community Bank.

1989

Neal Herstik

47

Attorney at Law, Gross, Truss & Herstik, PC (1997 to present); Director of Monmouth Capital Corporation (2002 to present); First Vice President, Marlboro Community Players, Inc., a non-profit corporation (2000 to 2002); Co-founder and former President, Manalapan-Englishtown Education Foundation, Inc., a non-profit corporation (1995 to 2001).

2004

Scott L. Robinson

36

Director.  Associate Director of Standard & Poor’s, a global credit rating agency (1998 to present); Adjunct Professor at New York University, The Real Estate Institute (2003 to present).

2005




5







DIRECTORS WHOSE TERMS EXPIRE IN 2008




Nominee



Age

Present Position with the Company; Business

Experience During Past Five Years; Other

                          Directorships                              


Director
  Since  



Matthew I. Hirsch

46

Director.  Attorney at Law (1985 to present); Adjunct Professor of Law (1993 to present), Widener University School of Law.

2000

Cynthia J. Morgenstern

36

Executive Vice President (2001 to present) and Director (2002 to present).  Vice President (1996 to 2001) Summit Bank, Commercial Real Estate Division, a regional commercial bank.

2002

Stephen B. Wolgin

52

Director.  Principal of U.S. Real Estate Advisors, Inc. (2000 to present), a real estate advisory services group based in New York; Principal of the Wolgin Group (2000-2003); prior affiliations with J.P. Morgan, Odyssey Associates, The Prudential Realty Group, Standard & Poor’s Corporation, and Grubb and Ellis.

2003





THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF EACH OF THE THREE PERSONS STANDING FOR ELECTION NAMED ABOVE




6





Committees of the Board of Directors and Meeting Attendance


The Board of Directors had four meetings during the last fiscal year.  No Director attended fewer than 75% of the meetings.  


The Company has a standing Audit Committee, Stock Option Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors.


Audit Committee


The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include reviewing and overseeing financial reporting, policies and procedures and internal controls, retaining the independent auditor, approving the audit fees, and discussing the independent auditors independence.  It also overseeing the internal audit function, legal and regulatory compliance and adherence to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, establishing procedures for complaints received regarding the Company’s accounting, internal accounting controls and auditing matters.  In addition, the Audit Committee prepares the Audit Committee Report which is included in the Company’s annual proxy statements.    The Audit Committee had four meetings during the fiscal year, including an executive session with the independent auditors, in which management did not attend.  


The current members of the Company’s Audit Committee are Matthew I. Hirsch, Peter J. Weidhorn and Stephen B. Wolgin.  The Board has determined that the members of the Audit Committee are independent as defined by the rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market, and that each of them is able to read and understand fundamental financial statements.  The Board has also determined that Peter J. Weidhorn is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the rules of the SEC and is “financially sophisticated” within the meaning of the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market.


Stock Option Committee


The Stock Option Committee administers the Company’s 1997 Stock Option Plan and had one meeting during the last fiscal year.  The current members of the Stock Option Committee are Matthew I. Hirsch and Stephen B. Wolgin.  The Board has determined that the members of the Stock Option Committee are independent as defined by the rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market.  


Compensation Committee


The Compensation Committee evaluates the President’s performance in light of the Company’s goals and objectives and determines the President’s and executive officers’ compensation, which includes base salary and bonus.  The Compensation Committee had one meeting during the last fiscal year.  The current members of the Compensation Committee are Matthew I. Hirsch and Stephen B. Wolgin.  The Board has determined that the members of the Compensation Committee are independent as defined by the rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market.  



7





Nominating Committee


The Nominating Committee identifies, considers and recommends candidates to serve as members of the Board and makes recommendations regarding the structure and composition of the Board of Directors and Committees.  The Nominating Committee had one meeting during the last fiscal year.  The current members of the Nominating Committee are Matthew I. Hirsch, Peter J. Weidhorn and Stephen B. Wolgin.   The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Nominating Committee is an independent Director as defined by the rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market.  Our Nominating Committee does not operate under a written charter.


The principal function of the Nominating Committee is to review and select candidates for nomination to the Board of Directors. The Nominating Committee will consider director candidates recommended by the Company's shareholders. Recommendations with regard to nominees for election to the Board of Directors may be submitted by any stockholder entitled to vote for the election of directors in writing, received by the Secretary of the Corporation at least 45 days prior to the date on which the Company first mailed its proxy materials for the prior year's annual meeting of shareholders, or, if the Company did not have an annual meeting of shareholders in the prior year, 90 days prior to the date of the annual meeting. Each notice of nomination must set forth (i) the name, age, business address and, if known, residence address of each nominee, (ii) the principal occupation or employment of each such nominee, and (iii) the number of shares of common stock of the Company which are beneficially owned by each such nominee.


In connection with the formation of the Nominating Committee, the Company's Board of Directors established certain minimum qualifications for board members, including being at least 21 years old and possessing (1) the ability to read and understand corporate financial statements, (2) relevant business experience and professional skills, (3) high moral character and personal and professional integrity, and (4) the willingness to commit sufficient time to attend to his or her duties and responsibilities as a director of a public corporation. In addition, the Nominating Committee may consider a variety of other qualities and skills, including (i) the ability to exercise independent decision-making, (ii) the absence of conflicts of interest and, (iii) the ability to work effectively with other directors in collectively serving the long-term interests of all shareholders. Nominees must also meet any applicable requirements of SEC regulations, state law, and the Company's articles of incorporation and bylaws.


The Nominating Committee has established a process for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. The Nominating Committee will annually assess the qualifications, expertise, performance and willingness to serve of existing directors. If at this time or at any other time during the year the Board of Directors determines a need to add a new director with specific qualifications or to fill a vacancy on the Board, the Chair of the Nominating Committee will then initiate the search, seeking input from other directors and senior management, considering nominees previously submitted by shareholders, and, if deemed necessary or appropriate, hiring a search firm. An initial slate of candidates satisfying the specific qualifications, if any, and otherwise qualifying for membership on the Board, will then be identified and presented to the Nominating Committee by the Committee Chairman. The Nominating Committee will then prioritize the candidates and determine if the Nominating Committee members, other directors or senior management have relationships with the preferred



8




candidates and can initiate contacts. To the extent feasible, all of the members of the Nominating Committee and the President will interview the prospective candidate(s). Evaluations and recommendations of the interviewers will be submitted to the Nominating Committee for final evaluation. The Nominating Committee will meet to consider such recommendations and to approve the final candidate. The Nominating Committee will evaluate all nominees for director, including nominees recommended by a stockholder, on the same basis.  


To date, there are no third parties being compensated for identifying and evaluating candidates.


Independent Director Meeting


The Company’s independent directors, as defined under the listing standards of the NASDAQ stock market, have established a policy to meet separately from the other directors in a regularly scheduled executive session at least annually, and at such times as may be deemed appropriate by the Company’s independent directors.  Any independent director may call an executive session of independent directors at any time.  


Shareholder Communications


The Company has established procedures for shareholders to communicate with the Board of Directors on a confidential basis.   Shareholders who wish to communicate with the Board or with a particular director may send a letter to the Secretary of the Company at 3499 Route 9 North, Suite 3-C, Freehold, NJ  07728.  The mailing envelope must contain a clear notation indicating that the enclosed mailing is a “Stockholder-Board Communication” or “Stockholder-Director Communication”.  All such letters must identify the author as a stockholder and clearly state whether the intended recipients of the letter are all of the members of the Board or just certain specified individual directors.  The Secretary will make copies of all such letters and circulate them to the directors addressed.  If a stockholder wishes the communication to be confidential, such shareholder must clearly indicate on the envelope that the communication is “Confidential”.  The Secretary will then forward such communication, unopened, to the intended recipient.  


Code of Conduct


The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all directors, officers, and employees of the Company, including its principal executive officers and principal financial officer.  This code is posted on our website at http:www.mreic.com.  During 2005, no violations of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics were reported nor were any waivers granted.


PROPOSAL 2

APPROVAL OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

It is proposed to approve the appointment of Reznick Group, P.C. as Independent Auditors for the purpose of making the annual audit of the books of account of the Company for the year ending September 30, 2006, and shareholder approval of said appointment is requested.   There are no affiliations between the Company and Reznick Group, P.C., its partners, associates



9




or employees, other than its employment as Independent Auditors for the Company.  Reznick Group, P.C. informed the Company that it has no direct or indirect financial interest in the Company.  The Company expects a representative of Reznick Group, P.C. to be present at the Annual Meeting either to make a statement or to respond to appropriate questions.


The approval of the appointment of the Independent Auditors must be by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting.  In the event Reznick Group, P.C. does not receive an affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote, then another firm will be appointed as Independent Auditors and the shareholders will be asked to ratify the appointment at the next annual meeting.


THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THIS PROPOSAL


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT


The following table lists information with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company’s Common Stock (Shares) as of March 1, 2006 by:

·

each person known by the Company to beneficially own more than five percent of the Company’s outstanding Shares;

·

the Company’s directors;

·

the Company’s executive officers; and

·

all of the Company’s executive officers and directors as a group.

Unless otherwise indicated, the person or persons named below have sole voting and investment power and that person’s address is c/o Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, Juniper Business Plaza, 3499 Route 9 North, Suite 3-C, Freehold, New Jersey 07728.  In determining the number and percentage of shares beneficially owned by each person, Shares that may be acquired by that person under options exercisable within sixty (60) days of March 1, 2006 are deemed beneficially owned by that person and are deemed outstanding for purposes of determining the total number of outstanding shares for that person and are not deemed outstanding for that purpose for all other shareholders.  



10






Name and Address
of Beneficial Owner

Amount and Nature
of Beneficial Ownership(1)

Percentage
of Shares
Outstanding(2)

Oakland Financial Corporation
34200 Mound Road

Sterling Heights, Michigan  48310

1,630,865 (3)

 8.39%

Palisade Concentrated Equity

Partnership, L.P.

One Bridge Plaza

Fort Lee, New Jersey  07024

1,535,000 (4)

 7.90%


Teachers Advisors, Inc.

730 Third Avenue

New York, NY  10017


   952,110 (5)

  

 4.90%

Anna T. Chew

   151,309 (6)

*

Daniel D. Cronheim

     68,049 (7)

*

Neal Herstik

       5,600 (8)

*

Matthew I. Hirsch

     47,723 (9)

*

Eugene W. Landy

1,031,095 (10)

5.25%

Samuel A. Landy

   249,888 (11)

1.28%

Michael P. Landy

     85,293 (12)

*

Cynthia J. Morgenstern

   107,847 (13)

*

Scott L. Robinson

       2,000

*

Maureen E. Vecere

     15,232 (14)

*

Peter J. Weidhorn

    105,370

*

Stephen B. Wolgin

      11,156 (15)

*

Directors and Officers as a group

 1,880,562

9.49%



*Less than 1%.




11




(1)

Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table and pursuant to applicable community property laws, the Company believes that the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all Shares listed.


(2)

Based on the number of Shares outstanding on March 14, 2006, which was 19,434,288 Shares.


(3)

Based upon a Schedule 13D/A dated June 10, 2005,  from Oakland Financial Corporation (“Oakland”), Liberty Bell Agency, Inc. (“Liberty Bell”), and Cherokee Insurance Company (“Cherokee”), as of June 10, 2005, Oakland owns 91,759, Liberty Bell owns 597,542, Cherokee owns 867,705, Erie Manufactured Home Properties, LLC, owns 30,132, and Matthew T. Moroun owns 43,727.  This 13D/A filed with the SEC by Oakland, indicates that Oakland shares voting and dispositive power with respect to those Shares with Liberty Bell, Cherokee, and Erie, all of which are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Oakland.  Matthew T. Moroun is the Chairman of the Board and controlling stockholder of Oakland, Liberty Bell, Cherokee and Erie.

 

(4)

Based upon Schedule 13G/A dated February 13, 2006, filed with the SEC by Palisade Capital Management, LLC, which indicates that Palisade has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 1,535,000 Shares.


(5)   

Based upon Schedule 13G dated February 14, 2006, filed with the SEC by Teachers Advisors, Inc., which indicates that Teachers has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 952,110 Shares.


(6)     

Includes (a) 56,493 Shares owned jointly with Ms. Chew’s husband; and (b) 14,816 Shares held in Ms. Chew’s 401(k) Plan.  Includes 80,000 Shares issuable upon exercise of stock options.  Excludes 50,000 Shares issuable upon the exercise of a stock option, which stock option is not exercisable until August 10, 2006.


(7)

Includes 15,000 Shares issuable upon exercise of a stock option.


(8)

Includes 5,000 Shares issuable upon the exercise of a stock option.


(9)

Includes 36,723 Shares owned jointly with Mr. Hirsch’s wife and 11,000 Shares issuable upon exercise of a stock option.


(10)

Includes (a) 97,109 Shares owned by Mr. Landy’s wife; (b) 161,764 Shares held in the Landy & Landy Employees’ Profit Sharing Plan of which Mr. Landy is a trustee and has shared voting and dispositive power; (c) 126,585 Shares held in the Landy & Landy Employees’ Pension Plan of which Mr. Landy is a trustee and has shared voting and dispositive power; and (d) 60,000 Shares held in the Eugene W. and Gloria Landy Family Foundation, a charitable trust, over which Mr. Landy has shared voting and dispositive power.  Includes 195,000 Shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options.  Excludes 65,000 Shares issuable upon the exercise of a stock option, which stock option is not exercisable until August 10, 2006.


(11)

Includes (a) 7,318 Shares owned by Mr. Landy’s wife; (b) 84,799 Shares held in custodial accounts for Mr. Landy’s minor children under the New Jersey Uniform Transfers to Minors Act with respect to which he disclaims any beneficial interest but he has sole dispositive and voting power; (c) 1,000 Shares in the Samuel Landy Family Limited Partnership; and (d)



12




68,843 Shares held in the UMH 401(k) Plan.  As a co-trustee of the UMH 401(k), Mr. Landy has shared voting power over the Shares held by the UMH 401(k).  He, however, disclaims beneficial ownership of all of the Shares held by the UMH 401(k), except for the 35,106 Shares held by the UMH 401(k) for his benefit.  Includes 15,000 Shares issuable upon the exercise of a stock option.


(12)

Includes (a) 9,478 Shares owned by Mr. Landy’s wife; and (b) 62,771 Shares held in custodial accounts for Mr. Landy’s minor children under the New Jersey Uniform Transfer to Minors Act in which he disclaims any beneficial interest but has power to vote.  Excludes 25,000 Shares issuable upon the exercise of a stock option, which stock option is not exercisable until August 10, 2006.


(13)  

Includes 1,689 Shares held in Ms. Morgenstern’s 401(k) plan over which she has sole dispositive power.  Includes 50,000 Shares issuable upon the exercise of a stock option.  Excludes 50,000 Shares issuable upon the exercise of a stock option, which stock option is not exercisable until August 10, 2006.


(14)  

Includes 15,000 Shares issuable upon the exercise of a Stock Option. Excludes 25,000 Shares issuable upon the exercise of a stock option, which stock option is not exercisable until August 10, 2006.


(15)   

Includes 900 Shares owned by Mr. Wolgin’s wife.


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


Summary Compensation Table


The following Summary Compensation Table shows compensation paid or accrued by the Company for services rendered during 2005, 2004, and 2003 to the President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President.  There were no other executive officers whose aggregate cash compensation allocated to the Company exceeded $100,000:


  

Annual Compensation


Name and Principal Position

 

Fiscal

Year

 


Salary

 


Bonus

 

Options Granted

 


Other

Eugene W. Landy

 

2005

 

175,000

 

15,000

 

65,000

 

$78,590(1)

Chairman of the Board

 

2004

 

168,750

 

15,000

 

65,000

 

223,700(1)

and President

 

2003

 

150,000

 

30,000

 

65,000

 

94,000(1)

           

Cynthia J. Morgenstern

 

2005

 

172,000

 

15,038

 

50,000

 

33,876(2)

Executive Vice President

 

2004

 

156,250

 

12,654

 

50,000

 

 27,749(2)

  

2003

 

139,077

 

9,615

 

-0-

 

21,905(2)



(1)

Represents Director’s fees of $16,000, $16,000, and $17,500 for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, paid to Mr. Landy;  accrual for pension and other benefits of $45,090, $190,200, and $59,000 for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, in accordance with Mr. Landy’s employment contract;   and   legal   fees of   $17,500 for each of the years 2005, 2004 and 2003.



13




(2)

Represents Director’s fees, fringe benefits and discretionary contributions by the Company to the Company’s 401(k) Plan allocated to an account of the named executive officer.


Compensation of Directors


The Directors receive a fee of $1,500 for each Board meeting attended and an additional fixed annual fee of $10,000 payable quarterly.  Directors appointed to committees received $150 for each committee meeting attended.  Those specific committees are Compensation Committee, Audit Committee, Stock Option Committee and Nominating Committee.


Stock Option Plan

The following table sets forth, for the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table, information regarding individual grants of stock options made during the year ended September 30, 2005:


     

Potential Realized

  

Percent

Price

 

Value at Assumed Annual

 

Options

Granted to

Per

Expiration

Rates for Option Terms

Name

Granted

Employees

Share

Date

5%

10%

       

Eugene W. Landy

65,000

27%

$8.28

8/10/2013

$257,000

$615,500

       

Cynthia J. Morgenstern

50,000

20%

$8.28

8/10/2013

$197,700

$473,400

       


The following table sets forth for the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table, information regarding stock options outstanding at September 30, 2005:


        

Value of

        

Unexercised

        

Options

      

Number of Unexercised

 

At Year-End

  

Shares

 

Value

 

Options at Year-End

 

Exercisable/

Name

 

Exercised

 

Realized

 

Exercisable/Unexercisable

 

Unexercisable

         

Eugene W. Landy

 

65,000

 

$98,475

 

195,000/65,000

 

$172,250/-0-

         

Cynthia Morgenstern

 

-0-

 

-0-

 

50,000/50,000

 

$39,000/-0-



Employment Agreements

On January 1, 2004, Eugene W. Landy’s Employment Agreement with the Company was amended to extend for five years to December 31, 2009.  Mr. Landy’s amended Employment Agreement provides for (1) an increase in his annual base compensation from $150,000 to $175,000; (2) an increase in his severance payment from $300,000 payable $100,000 a year for three years to $500,000 payable $100,000 a year for five years; and (3) an increase from $40,000 a year to $50,000 a year of his pension benefits; and (4) an extension of three years of his



14




pension payments commencing January 1, 2004.  Mr. Landy receives bonuses and customary fringe benefits, including health insurance and five weeks vacation.  Additionally, there will be bonuses voted by the Board of Directors.  The Employment Agreement is terminable by either party at any time subject to certain notice requirements.  


Effective January 15, 2004, the Company and Cynthia J. Morgenstern entered into a three-year employment agreement under which Ms. Morgenstern receives an annual base salary of $160,000, increasing to $176,000 in 2005 and to $194,000 in 2006, plus bonuses and customary fringe benefits, including health insurance, four weeks vacation and the use of an automobile.  If there is a voluntary or involuntary termination of employment, due to merger or change in control, Ms. Morgenstern, shall be entitled to receive one year's compensation at the date of termination.  In the event of her disability, her salary will continue for a period of two years.  The agreement was amended on September 16, 2004 to purchase disability insurance for Ms. Morgenstern.  In the event of a disability exceeding 90 days Ms. Morgenstern will receive lost wages from the disability policy, not her salary for two years.

Other Information

Except for specific agreements, the Company has no retirement plans in effect for Officers, Directors or employees and, at present, has no intention of instituting such plan.


Daniel D. Cronheim is a Director of the Company and Executive Vice President of David Cronheim Company (Cronheim).  The David Cronheim Company received $54,581 $132,185 and $14,377 in lease commissions in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and the David Cronheim Mortgage Corporation received $60,200, $-0-, and $-0- in mortgage brokerage commissions in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.  Cronheim Management Services (CMS), a division of Cronheim, received the sum of $334,505, $299,392 and $258,626 in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively for management fees.    During 2005, the Company entered into a new management contract with CMS, which did not materially alter the contract in place since 1998 (the 1998 contract).  Under the 1998 contract, CMS received 3% of gross rental income on certain properties for management fees.  CMS provides sub-agents as regional managers for the Company’s properties and compensates them out of this management fee.  Management believes that the aforesaid fees are no more than what the Company would pay for comparable services elsewhere.


REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


Overview and Philosophy


The Company has a Compensation Committee consisting of two independent outside Directors.  This Committee is responsible for making recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning compensation.  The Compensation Committee takes into consideration three major factors in setting compensation.


The first consideration is the overall performance of the Company.  The Board believes that the financial interests of the executive officers should be aligned with the success of the Company and the financial interests of its shareholders.  Increases in funds from operations, the enhancement of the Company’s equity portfolio, and the success of the Dividend Reinvestment



15




and Stock Purchase Plan all contribute to increases in stock prices, thereby maximizing shareholders’ return.


The second consideration is the individual achievements made by each officer.  The Company is a small real estate investment trust (REIT).  The Board of Directors is aware of the contributions made by each officer and makes an evaluation of individual performance based on their own familiarity with the officer.


The final criterion in setting compensation is comparable wages in the industry.  In this regard, the REIT industry maintains excellent statistics.


Evaluation


The Company’s funds from operations continue to increase.  The Committee reviewed the growth of the Company and progress made by Eugene W. Landy, Chief Executive Officer and whether his accomplishments met the bonus goals outlined in his employment contract.  His base compensation under his amended contract was increased in 2004 to $175,000 per year, and his bonus for 2005 was $15,000.


Compensation Committee:

Matthew I. Hirsch

Stephen P. Wolgin



REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE


The Board of Directors adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee in March, 2001.  The Board of Directors amended this charter in September 2005.  The amended charter was included in our filing with the SEC on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005.  It is also presented on our website at http: www.mreic.com.


The Company has an Audit Committee consisting of three “independent” Directors, as defined by the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market.  The Audit Committee’s role is to act on behalf of the Board of Directors in the oversight of all material aspects of the Company’s reporting, internal control and audit functions.


We have reviewed and discussed with management the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended September 30, 2005.


We have discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit Committees.


We have received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors required by Independence Standard No. 1, “Independence Discussions with Audit Committees”, and have discussed with the auditors the auditors’ independence.


Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, we recommend to the Board of Directors that the financial statements referred to above be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005.



16





Fees Billed by Independent Auditors


KPMG LLP (KPMG) served as the Company’s independent registered public accountants for the years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 and the first two quarters of fiscal 2005.  The following are the fees billed by KPMG in connection with services rendered:


 

2005

 

2004

    

Audit Fees

$32,500

 

$59,000

Audit Related Fees

-0-

 

-0-

Tax Fees

-0-

 

39,000

All Other Fees

-0-

 

-0-

    Total Fees

$32,500

 

$98,000


Reznick Group (Reznick) served as the Company’s independent registered public accountants for the year ended September 30, 2005.  The following are fees billed by and accrued to Reznick in connection with services rendered:


 

2005

 

2004

    

Audit Fees

$130,000

 

$-0-

Audit Related Fees

-0-

 

-0-

Tax Fees

30,000

 

-0-

All Other Fees

-0-

 

-0-

    Total Fees

$160,000

 

$-0-


Audit fees include professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements, management’s assessment of internal controls, and reviews of financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.  Audit fees also include services that are normally provided by the Company’s independent auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory filings, such as consents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  This fiscal year was the first year the Company was subject to the Sarbanes – Oxley Act Section 404 concerning internal controls.


Tax fees include professional services rendered for the preparation of the Company’s federal and state corporate tax returns and supporting schedules as may be required by the Internal Revenue Service and applicable state taxing authorities.  Tax fees also include other work directly affecting or supporting the payment of taxes, including planning and research of various tax issues.


Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy


The Audit Committee has adopted a policy for the pre-approval of audit and permitted non-audit services provided by the Company’s principal independent accountants.  The policy requires that all services provided by our independent registered public accountants to the



17




Company, including audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services, must be pre-approved by the Committee.  The pre-approval requirements do not prohibit day-to-day normal tax consulting services, which matters will not exceed $10,000 in the aggregate.  


The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of the non-audit services described above is compatible with maintaining KPMG and Reznick’s independence.


COMPARATIVE STOCK PERFORMANCE


The following line graph compares the total return of the Company’s common stock for the last five fiscal years to the NAREIT All REIT Total Return Index, published by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT), and the S&P 500 Index for the same period.  The total return reflects stock price appreciation and dividend reinvestment for all three comparative indices.  The information herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but neither its accuracy nor its completeness is guaranteed.

[mreic2006proxystatement002.gif]


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS


There are no family relationships between any of the Directors or executive officers of the Company, except that Samuel A. Landy and Michael P. Landy are the sons of Eugene W. Landy, the President and a Director of the Company.


Eugene W. Landy and Samuel A. Landy are partners in the law firm of Landy & Landy, which firm, or its predecessor firms, have been retained by the Company as legal counsel since the formation of the Company, and which firm the Company proposes to retain as legal counsel for the current fiscal year.  The Company now uses outside counsel for most of the legal services required.  The New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled that the relationship of directors also serving as outside counsel is not per se improper, but the attorney should fully discuss the issue of conflict with the other directors and disclose it as part of the proxy statement so that shareholders can consider the conflict issue when voting for or against the attorney/director nominee.


Daniel D. Cronheim, a Director of the Company, is the Executive Vice President and General Counsel of David Cronheim Company, the real estate advisor to the Company.



18





COMPLIANCE WITH EXCHANGE ACT FILING REQUIREMENTS


Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Company’s Officers and Directors, and persons who own more than 10% of the Company’s Common Stock, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Officers, Directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by Securities and Exchange Commission regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.  Based solely on review of the copies of such forms furnished to the Company, the Company believes that, during the fiscal year, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its Officers, Directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were met.


OTHER MATTERS


The Board of Directors knows of no other matters other than those stated in this Proxy Statement which are to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting.  If any other matters should properly come before the Annual Meeting, it is intended that proxies in the accompanying form will be voted on any such matter in accordance with the judgment of the persons voting such proxies.  Discretionary authority to vote on such matters is conferred by such proxies upon the persons voting them.


The Company will provide, without charge, to each person being solicited by this Proxy Statement, on the written request of any such person, a copy of the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005 (as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission), including the financial statements and schedules thereto.  All such requests should be directed to Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, Attention:  Shareholder Relations, Juniper Business Plaza, 3499 Route 9 North, Suite 3-C, Freehold, NJ 07728.



19





SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS


In order for Shareholder Proposals for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be eligible for inclusion in the Company’s 2007 Proxy Statement, they must be received by the Company at its office at Juniper Business Plaza, 3499 Route 9 North, Suite 3-C, Freehold, New Jersey 07728 not later than December 7, 2006.


BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS





Eugene W. Landy

       President and Director




Dated:  March 23, 2006



Important:  Shareholders can help the Directors avoid the necessity and expense of sending follow-up letters to insure a quorum by promptly returning the enclosed proxy.  The proxy is revocable and will not affect your right to vote in person in the event you attend the meeting.  You are earnestly requested to sign and return the enclosed proxy in order that the necessary quorum may be represented at the meeting.  The enclosed addressed envelope requires no postage and is for your convenience.

 




20