For the transition period from ____________ to _____________

 

---

 

 

202 East Center Street, P.O. Box 1387, Warsaw, Indiana 46581-1387

(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

 

(574) 267-6144

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES [ X ] NO [ ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [ ] No [ ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). (check one):

 

Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ X ] Non-accelerated filer[ ] (do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company [ ]

 

 

Number of shares of common stock outstanding at July 31, 2009: 12,432,430

 

LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Form 10-Q Quarterly Report

Table of Contents

 

PART I.

 

 

PART II.

 

 

 

PART 1

LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION

ITEM 1 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008

(in thousands except for share data)

 (Page 1 of 2)

 

 

 

 

 

(continued)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008

(in thousands except for share data)  

(Page 2 of 2)

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

For the Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

(in thousands except for share and per share data)

 

(Unaudited)

 

(Page 1 of 2)

 

 

 

(continued)

 

 

 

LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

For the Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

(in thousands except for share and per share data)

 

(Unaudited)

 

(Page 2 of 2)

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

(in thousands)

(Unaudited)

(Page 1 of 2)

 

(Continued)

 

LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

(in thousands)

(Unaudited)

(Page 2 of 2)

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2009

 

(Table Amounts In thousands)

 

(Unaudited)

 

NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

 

This report is filed for Lakeland Financial Corporation (the “Company”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Lake City Bank (the “Bank”). All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Also included is the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiary, LCB Investments II, Inc. (“LCB Investments”). LCB Investments also owns LCB Funding, Inc. (“LCB Funding”), a real estate investment trust.

 

The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with instructions for Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (all of which are normal and recurring in nature) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three-month and six-month periods ending June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009. The 2008 Lakeland Financial Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K should be read in conjunction with these statements.

 

NOTE 2. EARNINGS PER SHARE

 

Basic earnings per common share is net income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Basic weighted average common shares outstanding for the year-to-date periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were 12,409,146 and 12,239,372, respectively. Basic weighted average common shares outstanding for the quarterly periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were 12,416,710 and 12,262,926, respectively. Diluted earnings per common share includes the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under stock options, stock awards and warrants. Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding for the year-to-date periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were 12,512,890 and 12,447,473, respectively. Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding for the quarterly periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were 12,515,196 and 12,468,486, respectively. Stock options for 120,000 and 72,000 shares for the period ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively, were not considered in computing diluted earnings per common share because they were antidilutive. In addition, warrants for 396,538 shares for the periods ended June 30, 2009 were not considered in computing diluted earnings per share because they were antidilutive. Earnings and dividends per share are restated for all stock splits and dividends through the date of issuance of the financial statements. The common shares included in Treasury Stock for 2009 and 2008 reflect the acquisition of 95,353 and 100,946 shares, respectively, of Lakeland Financial Corporation common stock that have been purchased under a directors’ deferred compensation plan. Because these shares are held in trust for the participants, they are treated as outstanding

 

when computing the weighted-average common shares outstanding for the calculation of both basic and diluted earnings per share.

 

 

NOTE 3. LOANS

 

 

Changes in the allowance for loan losses are summarized as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

NOTE 4. SECURITIES

 

          Information related to the fair value of securities available for sale and the related gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is provided in the tables below.

 

 

          Information regarding the fair value of available for sale debt securities by maturity as of June 30, 2009 is presented below. Maturity information is based on contractual maturity for all securities other than mortgage-backed securities. Actual maturities of securities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to prepay the obligation without prepayment penalty.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

          Purchase premiums or discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the terms of the securities or over estimated lives for mortgage-backed securities. Gains and losses on sales are based on the amortized cost of the security sold and recorded on the trade date.

 

          Information regarding the securities gain and loss activity included in accumulated other comprehensive income is presented below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

          Securities with carrying values of $226.9 million and $310.7 million were pledged as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, as collateral for deposits of public funds, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, borrowings from the FHLB and for other purposes as permitted or required by law.

 

          Information regarding securities with unrealized losses as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 is presented below. The tables distribute the securities between those with unrealized losses for less than twelve months and those with unrealized losses for twelve months or more.

 

 

 

 

The number of securities with unrealized losses as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 is presented below.

 

 

All of the following are considered to determine whether or not the impairment of these securities is other-than-temporary. Seventy-one percent of the securities are backed by the U.S. Government, government agencies, government sponsored agencies or are A rated or better, except for certain non-local municipal securities. Mortgage-backed securities which are not issued by the U.S. Government or government sponsored agencies (private label mortgage-backed securities) met specific criteria set by the Asset Liability Management Committee at their time of purchase, including having the highest rating available by either Moody’s or S&P. None of the securities have call provisions (with the exception of the municipal securities) and payments as originally agreed have been received. For the government, government-sponsored agency and municipal securities, there were no concerns of credit losses and there was nothing to indicate that full principal will not be received. Management considers the unrealized losses on these securities to be primarily interest rate driven and no loss is expected to be realized unless the securities are sold, which management does not have the intent or need to sell these securities at this time.

 

As of June 30, 2009, the Company had $76.6 million of collateralized mortgage obligations which were not issued by the federal government or government sponsored agencies, but were rated AAA by S&P and/or Aaa by Moody’s at the time of purchase. Seven of the 24 private label mortgage backed securities were still rated AAA/Aaa as of June 30, 2009, but seventeen were downgraded by S&P, Fitch and/or Moody’s, including nine which were ranked below investment grade by one or more rating agencies. For these private label

 

mortgage-backed securities, additional analysis is performed to determine if the impairment is temporary or other-than-temporary in which case impairment would need to be recorded for these securities. The initial analysis is based upon outside, third party reports which include projections of the cash flows of the individual securities under several different scenarios based upon assumptions as to collateral defaults, prepayment speeds, expected losses and the severity of potential losses. Based upon the initial review using the third party reports, securities may be identified for further analysis. If any are identified management makes assumptions as to prepayment speeds, default rates, severity of losses and lag time until losses are actually recorded for each security based upon historical data for each security and other factors. Cash flows for each security using these assumptions are generated and the net present value is computed using an appropriate discount rate for the individual security. The net present value is then compared to the book value of the security to determine if there is any other-than-temporary impairment that must be recorded. Based on this analysis of the private label mortgage-backed securities as of June 30, 2009, the Company does not believe any other-than-temporary impairment needs to be recorded.

 

The Company does not have a history of actively trading securities, but keeps the securities available for sale should liquidity or other needs develop that would warrant the sale of securities. While these securities are held in the available for sale portfolio, the current intent and ability is to hold them until a recovery in fair value or maturity.

 

NOTE 5. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

 

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

 

 

 

          The Company previously disclosed in its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 that it expected to contribute $250,000 to its pension plan and $136,000 to its SERP plan in 2009. As of June 30,

 

2009, $0 had been contributed to the pension plan and $0 to the SERP plan, however, management expects to contribute the full $250,000 to its pension plan and $136,000 to its SERP plan in 2009.

 

NOTE 6. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

 

The Company adopted FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP 157-4)” during the second quarter of 2009. FSP 157-4 clarifies and includes additional factors for determining whether there has been a significant decrease in market activity for an asset when the market for that asset is not active. FSP 157-4 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company’s adoption of this standard in the second quarter of 2009 did not have any material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.

 

The Company adopted FASB Staff Position No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other Than Temporary Impairments (FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2)” during the second quarter of 2009. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance in U.S. GAAP for debt securities to make the guidance more operational and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairment on debt and equity securities. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company’s adoption of this standard did not have any material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.

 

The Company adopted FASB Staff Position No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1)” during the second quarter of 2009. This FSP amends FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to require an entity to provide disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial information. This FSP also amends APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. In addition, an entity shall disclose in the body or in the accompanying notes of its summarized financial information for interim reporting periods and in its financial statements for annual reporting periods the fair value of all financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value, whether recognized or not recognized in the statement of financial position, as required by FASB Statement No. 107. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company’s adoption of this standard did not have any material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.

 

          In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (“SFAS 165”). SFAS 165 establishes general standards for accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are available to be issued (“subsequent events”). More specifically, SFAS 165 sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition in the financial statements, identifies the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and the disclosures that should be made about events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date. SFAS 165 provides largely the same guidance on subsequent events which previously existed only in auditing literature, and is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June

 

15, 2009. The Company adopted this standard for the interim reporting period ending June 30, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s operating results or financial position.

 

NOTE 7. FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

 

          The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 effective January 1, 2008, which provides a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP.

 

          The Company also adopted the provisions of FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 157-2, which deferred until January 1, 2009 the application of SFAS 157 to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities not recognized or disclosed at least annually at fair value.  Items affected by this deferral included goodwill, repossessions and other real estate, all for which any necessary impairment analyses are performed using fair value measurements.

 

         SFAS 157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. SFAS 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

 

 

 

         Securities available for sale are valued primarily by a third party pricing service. The fair values of securities available for sale are determined on a recurring basis by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or pricing models utilizing significant observable inputs such as matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs). There were no transfers from or into Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 during the second quarter of 2009.

 

 

 

 

          Also, the Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain other financial assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These adjustments to fair value usually result from application of lower-of-cost-or-fair-value accounting or write-downs of individual assets. The table below presents the balances of assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

          Impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a gross carrying amount of $19.0 million, with a valuation allowance of $4.5 million, resulting in an additional provision for loan losses of $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. In addition, $125,000 in impairment of mortgage servicing rights, measured using Level 3 inputs within the fair value hierarchy, was recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2009. The $125,000 impairment was recorded in loan, insurance and service fees.

 

          The following table contains the estimated fair values and the related carrying values of the Company’s financial instruments. Items which are not financial instruments are not included.

 

 

          For purposes of the above disclosures of estimated fair value, the following assumptions were used as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, demand and

 

savings deposits, variable rate loans, variable rate short term borrowings and accrued interest is considered to approximate cost. The fair value of Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock is not determinable as there are restrictions on its transferability. The estimated fair value for fixed rate loans, certificates of deposit and fixed rate borrowings is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life. Real estate mortgages held for sale are based upon the actual contracted price for those loans sold but not yet delivered, or the current Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation price for normal delivery of mortgages with similar coupons and maturities at year-end. The fair value of off-balance sheet items is based on the current fees or cost that would be charged to enter into or terminate such arrangements. The estimated fair value of other financial instruments approximate cost and are not considered significant to this presentation.

 

NOTE 8. ISSUANCE OF PREFERRED STOCK

 

On February 27, 2009, the Company entered into a Letter Agreement with the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”), pursuant to which the Company issued (i) 56,044 shares of the Company’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) and (ii) a warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase 396,538 shares of the Company’s common stock, no par value (the “Common Stock”), for an aggregate purchase price of $56,044,000 in cash. This transaction was conducted in accordance with Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program implemented under the Troubled Assets Relief Program (“TARP”).

 

The Series A Preferred Stock will qualify as Tier 1 capital and will pay cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and 9% per annum thereafter. The Series A Preferred Stock is non-voting except with respect to certain matters affecting the rights of the holders thereof.

 

The Warrant has a 10-year term and is immediately exercisable upon its issuance, with an exercise price, subject to anti-dilution adjustments, equal to $21.20 per share of the Common Stock.

 

During the first quarter of 2009, the Company invested $56.0 million of the Capital Purchase Program funds received into the Bank. This additional capital positively impacted the Bank’s capital ratios and liquidity.

 

NOTE 9. RECLASSIFICATIONS

 

Certain amounts appearing in the financial statements and notes thereto for prior periods have been reclassified to conform with the current presentation. The reclassification had no effect on net income or stockholders’ equity as previously reported.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Part 1

LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION

ITEM 2 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

and

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

June 30, 2009

 

OVERVIEW

 

Lakeland Financial Corporation is the holding company for Lake City Bank. The Company is headquartered in Warsaw, Indiana and operates 43 offices in 12 counties in northern Indiana. The Company earned $8.3 million for the first six months of 2009, versus $10.0 million in the same period of 2008, a decrease of 17.1%. Net income was positively impacted by a $6.5 million increase in net interest income. Offsetting this positive impact was an increase of $5.3 million in the provision for loan losses, an increase of $3.9 million in noninterest expense and a decrease of $149,000 in noninterest income. Basic earnings per common share for the first six months of 2009 were $0.58 per share, versus $0.82 per share for the first six months of 2008. Diluted earnings per common share reflect the potential dilutive impact of stock options, stock awards and warrants. Diluted earnings per common share for the first six months of 2009 were $0.58 per share, versus $0.81 for the first six months of 2008. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the first six months of 2009 were impacted by $1.1 million in dividends and accretion of discount on preferred stock.

 

Net income for the second quarter of 2009 was $4.5 million, a decrease of 7.1% versus $4.8 million for the comparable period of 2008. The decrease was driven by a $2.5 million increase in noninterest expense, as well as a $1.9 million increase in the provision for loan losses. Offsetting these negative impacts was an increase of $4.0 million in net interest income as well as an increase of $50,000 in noninterest income. Basic earnings per share for the second quarter of 2009 were $0.29 per share, versus $0.39 per share for the second quarter of 2008. Diluted earnings per share for the second quarter of 2009 were $0.29 per share, versus $0.39 per share for the second quarter of 2008. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the second quarter of 2009 were impacted by $800,000 in dividends and accretion of discount on preferred stock.

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Net Interest Income

 

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, net interest income totaled $36.6 million, an increase of 21.8%, or $6.5 million, versus the first six months of 2008. This increase was primarily due to a $315.7 million, or 16.1%, increase in average earning assets to $2.28 billion. In addition, the Company’s net interest margin improved to 3.29% for the six month period ended June 30, 2009, versus 3.13% for the comparable period in 2008. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2009, net interest income totaled $19.5 million, an increase of 26.1%, or $4.0 million, versus the second quarter of 2008. This increase was primarily due to a 30 basis point increase in the Company’s net interest margin to 3.45%, versus 3.15% for the second quarter of

 

2008. In addition, average earning assets increased by $286.6 million, or 14.2%, to $2.305 billion in the second quarter of 2009, versus the second quarter of 2008.

 

Given the Company’s mix of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities at June 30, 2009, the Company would generally be considered to have a relatively neutral balance sheet structure. The Company’s balance sheet structure would normally be expected to produce a stable or declining net interest margin in a declining rate environment. As the Company’s balance sheet has become more neutral in structure, management believes that future rate movements will have less impact on net interest margin than historically, although other factors such as deposit mix, market deposit rate pricing and non-bank deposit products could have a dramatic impact on net interest margin. The Company’s mix of deposits has shifted to more reliance on certificates of deposits, specifically public fund deposits and brokered deposits, and corporate and public fund money market and repurchase agreements, which generally carry a higher interest rate cost than other types of interest bearing deposits. In addition, during the first quarter of 2009, the Company began using the Federal Reserve Bank’s Term Auction Facility and has increased its usage through the second quarter. Because of the favorable pricing structure and general terms of the program, the Company may consider further increases in usage in the future.

 

During the first six months of 2009, total interest and dividend income decreased by $1.8 million, or 3.1%, to $56.8 million, versus $58.6 million during the first six months of 2008. This decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in the tax equivalent yield on average earning assets. The tax equivalent yield on average earning assets decreased by 98 basis points to 5.1% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 versus the same period of 2008. During the second quarter of 2009, total interest and dividend income decreased by $182,000, or 0.6%, to $28.8 million, versus $29.0 million during the second quarter of 2008. This decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in the tax equivalent yield on average earning assets. The tax equivalent yield on average earning assets decreased by 77 basis points to 5.1% for the second quarter of 2009 versus the same period of 2008.

 

          During the first six months of 2009, loan interest income decreased by $3.2 million, or 6.5%, to $46.6 million, versus $49.9 million during the first six months of 2008. The decrease was driven by a 122 basis point decrease in the tax equivalent yield on loans to 5.0%, versus 6.3% in the first six months of 2008, somewhat offset by a $265.8 million, or 16.6%, increase in average daily loan balances. During the second quarter of 2009, loan interest income decreased by $572,000, or 2.3%, to $23.8 million, versus $24.4 million during the second quarter of 2008. The decrease was driven by a 93 basis point decrease in the tax equivalent yield on loans to 5.0%, versus 6.0% in the second quarter of 2008, somewhat offset by a $251.3 million, or 15.3%, increase in average daily loan balances.

 

The average daily securities balances for the first six months of 2009 increased $42.5 million, or 12.1%, to $392.5 million, versus $350.0 million for the same period of 2008. During the same periods, income from securities increased by $1.5 million, or 17.6%, to $10.1 million versus $8.6 million during the first six months of 2008. The increase was primarily the result of the increase in average daily securities balances, as well as a 23 basis point increase in the tax equivalent yield on securities, to 5.5%, versus 5.3% in the first six months of 2008. The average daily securities balances for the second quarter of 2009 increased $29.4 million, or 8.0%, to $395.7 million, versus $366.3 million for the same period of 2008. During the second quarter of 2009, income from securities was $5.0 million, an increase of $438,000, or 9.5%, versus the second quarter of 2008. The

 

increase was primarily the result of the increase in average daily securities balances, as well as a four basis point increase in the tax equivalent yield on securities.

 

Total interest expense decreased $8.4 million, or 29.3%, to $20.2 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, from $28.6 million for the comparable period in 2008. The decrease was primarily the result of a 114 basis point decrease in the Company’s daily cost of funds to 1.9%, versus 3.0% for the same period of 2008. Total interest expense decreased $4.2 million, or 31.2%, to $9.3 million for the second quarter of 2009, versus $13.5 million for the second quarter of 2008. The decrease was primarily the result of a 106 basis point decrease in the Company’s daily cost of funds to 1.7%, from 2.8% for the same period of 2008.

 

On an average daily basis, total deposits (including demand deposits) increased $346.7 million, or 22.6%, to $1.881 billion for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, versus $1.534 billion during the same period in 2008. The average daily balances for the second quarter of 2009 increased $299.9 million, or 19.3%, to $1.853 billion from $1.553 billion during the second quarter of 2008. On an average daily basis, noninterest bearing demand deposits were $220.0 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, versus $218.2 million for the same period in 2008. The average daily noninterest bearing demand deposit balances for the second quarter of 2009 were $222.2 million, versus $218.5 million for the second quarter of 2008. On an average daily basis, interest bearing transaction accounts increased $84.1 million, or 18.6%, to $537.0 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, versus the same period in 2008. Average daily interest bearing transaction accounts increased $48.6 million, or 10.1%, to $528.1 million for the second quarter of 2009, versus $479.5 million for the second quarter of 2008. When comparing the six months ended June 30, 2009 with the same period of 2008, the average daily balance of time deposits, which pay a higher rate of interest compared to demand deposit and transaction accounts, increased $262.2 million, primarily as a result of increases in brokered time deposits. The rate paid on time deposit accounts decreased 150 basis points to 2.9% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, versus the same period in 2008. During the second quarter of 2009, the average daily balance of time deposits increased $247.5 million, and the rate paid decreased 152 basis points to 2.7%, versus the second quarter of 2008.

 

Due to strong loan growth and additional relationship opportunities, the Company continued to focus on public fund deposits as a core funding strategy. In addition, the Company has increased its usage of brokered certificates of deposits as a result of loan growth and overall liquidity and funding management. On an average daily basis, total brokered certificates of deposit increased $129.4 million to $187.8 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, versus $58.4 million for the same period in 2008. During the second quarter of 2009, average daily brokered certificates of deposit were $146.9 million, versus $72.5 million during the second quarter of 2008. On an average daily basis, total public fund certificates of deposit decreased $50.9 million to $211.9 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, versus $262.7 million for the same period in 2008. During the second quarter of 2009, average daily public fund certificates of deposit were $204.5 million, versus $233.0 million during the second quarter of 2008. Public fund deposits are highly variable primarily due to the timing differences between when real estate property taxes are collected versus when those tax revenues are spent, as well as the intense competition for these funds. The Company is also a member of the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) deposit program. The program is a convenient way for participating customers to enjoy full FDIC insurance coverage on large certificates of deposit, and consists of a network of financial institutions which exchange funds. The average daily balances of CDARS certificates of deposit were $79.1 million and $87.2 million, respectively, in the six months and three months ended June 30, 2009. There were no CDARS deposits in the six months and three months ended June 30, 2008.

 

 

Average daily balances of borrowings were $313.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009, versus $381.6 million during the same period of 2008, and the rate paid on borrowings decreased 168 basis points to 1.4%. The decrease in average borrowings was driven by decreases of $53.5 million in notes payable, $34.5 million in securities sold under agreements to repurchase and $33.5 million in federal funds purchased. During the second quarter of 2009 the average daily balances of borrowings decreased $75.1 million to $342.4 million, versus $417.5 million for the same period of 2008, and the rate paid on borrowings decreased 153 basis points to 1.2%. On an average daily basis, total deposits (including demand deposits) and purchased funds increased 14.5% and 11.4%, respectively, when comparing the six-month and three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 versus the same period in 2008.

 

During the first quarter of 2009, the Company began using the Federal Reserve Bank’s Term Auction Facility (TAF). Average daily balances of borrowings under the facility were $43.2 million and $101.9 million, respectively, during the six months and three months ended June 30, 2009. The interest rate was 0.25% during both periods. There were no outstanding TAF borrowings prior to the first quarter of 2009. As discussed previously, the Company may consider further increases in usage in the future.

 

As a result of the unprecedented instability in the financial markets during the second half of 2008 and continuing into 2009, the Company reviewed its liquidity plan and has taken several actions designed to provide for an appropriate funding strategy in this unsettled environment. These actions include: actively communicating with correspondent banks who provide federal fund lines to ensure availability of these funds; expanded use of brokered certificate of deposits, which have been readily available to the Company at competitive rates; increased allocation of collateral at the Federal Reserve Bank for borrowings under their programs; increased usage of FHLB advances at advantageous rates; participation in the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) deposit program and an increased focus on attractive core deposit programs offered by the Company. The Company will continue to carefully monitor its liquidity planning and will make any necessary adjustments during this environment

 

The following tables set forth consolidated information regarding average balances and rates:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for Loan Losses

 

Based on management’s review of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, provisions for loan losses of $9.5 million and $4.9 million were recorded during the six-month and three-month periods ended June 30, 2009, versus provisions of $4.2 million and $3.0 million recorded during the same periods of 2008. Factors impacting the provision included the amount and status of classified credits, the level of charge-offs, management’s overall view on current credit quality and the regional and national economic conditions impacting credit quality, the amount and status of impaired loans, the amount and status of past due accruing loans (90 days or more), and overall loan growth as discussed in more detail below in the analysis relating to the Company’s financial condition.

 

Noninterest Income

 

          Noninterest income categories for six-month and three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are shown in the following table:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noninterest income decreased $149,000 and increased $50,000, respectively, for the six-month and three-month periods ended June 30, 2009, versus the same periods in 2008. The results for 2008 were impacted by a nonrecurring gain of $642,000 related to the Visa initial public offering, which occurred in the first quarter of 2008. Excluding this gain, noninterest income in the six-months ended June 30, 2009 increased by $493,000, or 4.4%, versus the same period of 2008. Wealth advisory fees decreased due to the decreased value of certain trust assets upon which many of the fees are based. Noninterest income for the six months and three months ended June 30, 2009 was positively impacted by increases in mortgage banking income. Recent declines in mortgage rates have led to greater numbers of loans refinancing as well as a larger pipeline of mortgage loan applications which, in turn, increase the amount of mortgage income. Loan, insurance and service fees declined in the six month period primarily due to $125,000 in non-cash impairment recorded on the value of the Company’s mortgage servicing rights, which was also driven by the declines in mortgage rates and associated refinancing, resulting in higher prepayment speeds.

 

Noninterest Expense

 

Noninterest expense categories for the six-month and three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are shown in the following table:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noninterest expense increased $3.9 million and $2.5 million, respectively, in the six-month and three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 versus the same periods of 2008. Other expense increased by $2.9 million and $1.8 million, respectively, in the six months and three months ended June 30, 2009, driven by regulatory expenses, which increased due to higher FDIC insurance premiums. FDIC premiums increased by $2.1 million and $1.5 million, respectively, in the six-month and three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 versus the same periods of 2008. The effect of higher FDIC insurance premiums is impacting the banking industry as a whole and the assessments may remain higher than recent historical levels for the foreseeable future. Also impacting noninterest expense were increases in salaries and employee benefits, which were higher due to staff additions in administrative and lending positions, normal merit increases and higher health insurance costs. Further impacting noninterest expense were increases in net occupancy expense and data processing fees and supplies. Higher maintenance and repair costs led to the increase in occupancy expense while data processing fees increased due to volume-driven account level activity fees and expanded technology-based client products.

 

 

 

Income Tax Expense

 

Income tax expense decreased $1.0 million, or 22.4%, for the first six months of 2009, compared to the same period in 2008. The combined state franchise tax expense and the federal income tax expense, as a percentage of income before income tax expense, decreased to 29.7% during the first six months of 2009 compared to 31.1% during the same period of 2008. The combined tax expense increased to 31.1% in the second quarter of 2009, versus 29.8% during the same period of 2008. The changes were driven by fluctuations in the percentage of revenue being derived from tax-advantaged sources in the six-month and three-month periods of 2009, compared to the same periods in 2008.

 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Certain of the Company’s accounting policies are important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition, since they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates associated with these policies are susceptible to material changes as a result of changes in facts and circumstances. Some of the facts and circumstances which could affect these judgments include changes in interest rates, in the performance of the economy or in the financial condition of borrowers. Management believes that its critical accounting policies include determining the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of mortgage servicing rights. The Company’s critical accounting policies are discussed in detail in the Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference as part of the Company’s 10-K filing).

 

FINANCIAL CONDITION

 

Total assets of the Company were $2.404 billion as of June 30, 2009, an increase of $26.7 million, or 1.1%, when compared to $2.377 billion as of December 31, 2008.

 

Total cash and cash equivalents decreased by $22.2 million, or 34.7%, to $41.8 million at June 30, 2009 from $64.0 million at December 31, 2008.

 

Total securities available for sale increased by $3.1 million, or 0.8%, to $390.1 million at June 30, 2009 from $387.0 million at December 31, 2008. The increase was a result of a number of transactions in the securities portfolio. Securities purchases totaled $62.7 million. Offsetting this increase were securities paydowns totaling $50.7 million, maturities and calls of securities totaling $12.3 million and the fair market value of the securities portfolio increased by $3.4 million. The increase in fair market value was due to higher market values for securities which are backed directly or indirectly by the federal government. The investment portfolio is managed to limit the Company’s exposure to risk by containing mostly mortgage-backed securities, other securities which are either directly or indirectly backed by the federal government or a local municipal government and collateralized mortgage obligations rated AAA by S&P and/or Aaa by Moody’s at the time of purchase. As of June 30, 2009, the Company had $76.6 million of collateralized mortgage obligations which were not backed by the federal government, but were rated AAA by S&P and/or Aaa by Moody’s at the time of purchase.

 

 

Seven of the 24 private label collateralized mortgage obligations are still rated AAA/Aaa as of June 30, 2009, but seventeen had been downgraded since the time of purchase by S&P, Fitch and/or Moody’s, including nine which were ranked below investment grade by one or more rating agencies. The Company, with the assistance of an outside advisor, analyzes projections for these securities that include projections of future performance in the underlying collateral under various scenarios and under various prepayment assumptions. Based on the analyses as of June 30, 2009, the projections indicated that principal and interest payments are expected to be collected over the life of the securities equaled or exceeded the current book value of these securities including interest, and no other than temporary impairment has been recorded as of June 30, 2009.

 

Real estate mortgage loans held-for-sale increased by $5.3 million, to $5.7 million at June 30, 2009 from $401,000 at December 31, 2008. The balance of this asset category is subject to a high degree of variability depending on, among other things, recent mortgage loan rates and the timing of loan sales into the secondary market. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, $71.0 million in real estate mortgages were originated for sale and $65.2 million in mortgages were sold.

 

Total loans, excluding real estate mortgage loans held-for-sale, increased by $48.8 million, or 2.7%, to $1.882 billion at June 30, 2009 from $1.833 billion at December 31, 2008. The portfolio breakdown at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 reflected 84% commercial and industrial, including commercial real estate and agri-business, 13% residential real estate and home equity and 3% consumer loans. The Company did not participate in the subprime mortgage lending markets and therefore did not have direct exposure to this sector as a lender.

 

The Company has a high percentage of commercial and commercial real estate loans, most of which are extended to small or medium-sized businesses. Commercial loans represent higher dollar loans to fewer customers and therefore higher credit risk than other types of loans. Pricing is adjusted to manage the higher credit risk associated with these types of loans. The Company also requires new and renewed variable rate commercial loans to have floor rates. The majority of fixed rate mortgage loans, which represent increased interest rate risk, are sold in the secondary market, as well as some variable rate mortgage loans. The remainder of the variable rate mortgage loans and a small number of fixed rate mortgage loans are retained.

 

Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that the principal is uncollectible. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb probable incurred credit losses relating to specifically identified loans based on an evaluation, as well as other probable incurred losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The evaluations take into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans and current economic conditions that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay. Management also considers trends in adversely classified loans based upon a monthly review of those credits. An appropriate level of general allowance is determined after considering the following factors: application of historical loss percentages, emerging market risk, commercial loan focus and large credit concentrations, new industry lending activity and current economic conditions. Federal regulations require insured institutions to classify their own assets on a regular basis. The regulations provide for three categories of classified loans – substandard, doubtful and loss. The regulations also contain a special mention category. Special mention is defined as loans that do not currently expose an insured institution to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant classification, but do possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving

 

management’s close attention. Assets classified as substandard or doubtful require the institution to establish specific allowances for loan losses. If an asset or portion thereof is classified as loss, the insured institution must either establish specified allowances for loan losses in the amount of 100% of the portion of the asset classified loss, or charge off such amount. At June 30, 2009, on the basis of management’s review of the loan portfolio, the Company had loans totaling $128.4 million on the classified loan list versus $98.8 million on December 31, 2008. As of June 30, 2009, the Company had $71.6 million of assets classified special mention, $56.1 million classified as substandard, $715,000 classified as doubtful and $0 classified as loss as compared to $47.2 million, $46.2 million, $5.4 million and $0 at December 31, 2008.

 

Allowance estimates are developed by management taking into account actual loss experience, adjusted for current economic conditions. The Company discusses this methodology with regulatory authorities to ensure compliance. Allowance estimates are considered a prudent measurement of the risk in the Company’s loan portfolio and are applied to individual loans based on loan type. In accordance with FASB Statements 5 and 114, the allowance is provided for losses that have been incurred as of the balance sheet date and is based on past events and current economic conditions, and does not include the effects of expected losses on specific loans or groups of loans that are related to future events or expected changes in economic conditions.

 

The allowance for loan losses increased 33.0%, or $6.2 million, from $18.9 million at December 31, 2008 to $25.1 million at June 30, 2009. Pooled loan allocations increased $2.3 million from $7.0 million at December 31, 2008 to $9.3 million at June 30, 2009, which was primarily a result of higher pooled loan balances. Specific loan allocations increased $3.0 million from $10.4 million at December 31, 2008 to $13.4 million at June 30, 2009. This increase was primarily due to the higher classified loan balance. The unallocated component of the allowance for loan losses increased $873,000 from $1.4 million at December 31, 2008 to $2.4 million at June 30, 2009, based on management’s assessment of economic and other qualitative factors impacting the loan portfolio, particularly the ongoing economic weakness in the Company’s market area. Management believes the allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2009 was at a level commensurate with the overall risk exposure of the loan portfolio. However, if economic conditions do not stabilize or improve, certain borrowers may experience difficulty and the level of nonperforming loans, charge-offs and delinquencies could rise and require further increases in the provision for loan losses.

 

Total impaired loans decreased by $1.3 million to $19.0 million at June 30, 2009 from $20.3 million at December 31, 2008. The decrease in the impaired loans category was primarily due to $2.0 million in paydowns received and a $1.5 million charge-off taken on one commercial relationship. The decrease in impaired loans due to paydowns and charge-offs was partially offset by the addition of four commercial relationships totaling $2.9 million. All of the impaired loans were on nonaccrual status at June 30, 2009. A loan is impaired when full payment under the original loan terms is not expected. Impairment is evaluated in the aggregate for smaller-balance loans of similar nature such as residential mortgage, and consumer loans, and on an individual loan basis for other loans. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance may be allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. The following table summarizes nonperforming assets at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total nonperforming assets decreased by $1.9 million, or 8.6%, to $20.5 million during the six-month period ended June 30, 2009. The decrease was primarily due to the paydowns and charge-offs on impaired commercial credits, partially offset by the addition of four commercial relationships to the impaired loan category. Five commercial relationships represented 64.5% of total nonperforming loans. Three of the five relationships are each less than $2.0 million. A $6.5 million credit to a manufacturer tied to the housing industry represented the largest exposure in the nonperforming category. Borrower collateral including real estate, receivables, inventory and equipment support the credit, however, there are no guarantors. The Company took a $906,000 charge-off related to this credit in 2008, and no charge-offs have been taken in 2009.

 

A commercial relationship consisting of two loans totaling $2.7 million represented the second largest exposure in the nonperforming category. The borrower is engaged in sales tied to the recreational vehicle industry as well as residential real estate development. Borrower collateral, including real estate and the personal guarantees of its principals, support the credit. However, there can be no assurances that full repayment of the loans will result. The Company took $1.3 million in charge-offs related to this relationship during 2008, and no charge-offs have been taken in 2009.

 

Management does not foresee a rapid recovery from the current distressed economic conditions in the Company’s markets as certain industries, including residential and commercial real estate development, recreational vehicle and mobile home manufacturing and other regional industries continue to experience general slow-downs and negative growth. The Company’s continued growth strategy promotes diversification among industries as well as a continued focus on enforcement of a strong credit environment and an aggressive position on loan work-out situations. While the Company believes that the impact of these industry-specific issues will be somewhat mitigated by its overall growth strategy, the economic recession impacting its entire geographic footprint will continue to present challenges. Additionally, the Company’s overall asset quality position can be influenced by a small number of credits due to the focus on commercial lending activity and the granularity inherent in this strategy.

 

 

Total deposits decreased by $150.2 million, or 8.0%, to $1.735 billion at June 30, 2009 from $1.885 billion at December 31, 2008. The decrease resulted from decreases of $112.5 million in brokered deposits, $104.9 million in interest bearing transaction accounts, $8.8 million in money market accounts, $4.4 million in demand deposits, $2.5 million in other certificates of deposit and $2.1 million in public fund certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more. Offsetting these decreases were increases of $76.5 million in certificates of deposit of $100,000 and over, $5.9 million in savings accounts and $2.6 million in CDARS certificates of deposit.

 

Total short-term borrowings increased by $163.0 million, or 80.4%, to $365.6 million at June 30, 2009 from $202.6 million at December 31, 2008. The increase resulted primarily from increases of $175.0 million in other borrowings, primarily from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago’s Term Auction Facility. Offsetting these increases were decreases of $10.0 million in securities sold under agreements to repurchase and $4.5 million in federal funds purchased. In addition, long-term borrowings decreased by $50.0 million primarily from long-term advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis.

 

Total equity increased by $62.2 million, or 41.5%, to $212.1 million at June 30, 2009 from $150.0 million at December 31, 2008. The increase was driven by the February 2009 issuance of 56,044 shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock to the United States Treasury in accordance with the Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program implemented under the Troubled Assets Relief Program. Preferred stock totaled $53.9 million, net of unearned discount of $2.2 million, at June 30, 2009 versus $0 at December 31, 2008. The remainder of the increase in total equity resulted from net income of $8.3 million, plus the decrease in the accumulated other comprehensive loss of $2.1 million, minus dividends of $4.8 million, plus $476,000 for stock issued through options exercised (including tax benefit), minus $123,000 for net treasury stock purchased plus $125,000 in stock compensation expense, comprised most of this increase.

 

The FDIC’s risk based capital regulations require that all insured banking organizations maintain an 8.0% total risk based capital ratio. The FDIC has also established definitions of “well capitalized” as a 5.0% Tier I leverage capital ratio, a 6.0% Tier I risk based capital ratio and a 10.0% total risk based capital ratio. All of the Bank’s ratios continue to be above these “well capitalized” levels. The Federal Reserve also has established minimum regulatory capital requirements for bank holding companies. As of June 30, 2009, the Company had regulatory capital in excess of these minimum requirements with a Tier 1 leverage capital ratio, Tier 1 risk based capital ratio and total risk based capital ratio of 10.2%, 11.9% and 13.1%, respectively.

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This document (including information incorporated by reference) contains, and future oral and written statements of the Company and its management may contain, forward-looking statements, within the meaning of such term in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business of the Company. Forward-looking statements, which may be based upon beliefs, expectations and assumptions of the Company’s management and on information currently available to management, are generally identifiable by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should” or other similar expressions. Additionally, all statements in this document, including forward-looking statements,

 

speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events.

 

The Company’s ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. The factors, which could have a material adverse effect on the operations and future prospects of the Company and its subsidiaries are detailed in the “Risk Factors” section included under Item 1a. of Part I of our Form 10-K. In addition to the risk factors described in that section, there are other factors that may impact any public company, including ours, which could have a material adverse effect on the operations and future prospects of the Company and its subsidiaries. These additional factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

 

 

These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements.

 

ITEM 3 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Interest rate risk represents the Company’s primary market risk exposure. The Company does not have a material exposure to foreign currency exchange risk, does not have any material amount of derivative financial instruments and does not maintain a trading portfolio. The board of directors annually reviews and approves the policy used to manage interest rate risk. The policy was last reviewed and approved in May 2009. The policy sets guidelines for balance sheet structure, which are designed to protect the Company from the impact that interest rate changes could have on net income, but does not necessarily indicate the effect on future net interest income. The Company, through its Asset/Liability Committee, manages interest rate risk by monitoring the computer simulated earnings impact of various rate scenarios and general market conditions. The Company then modifies its long-term risk parameters by attempting to generate the type of loans, investments, and deposits that currently fit the Company’s needs, as determined by the Asset/Liability Committee. This computer simulation analysis measures the net interest income impact of various interest rate scenario changes during the next 12 months. If the change in net interest income is less than 3% of primary capital, the balance sheet structure is considered to be within acceptable risk levels. June 30, 2009, the Company’s potential pretax exposure was within the Company’s policy limit, and not significantly different from December 31, 2008.

 

ITEM 4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

As required by Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, management has evaluated, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have

 

concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) were effective as of June 30, 2009. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. These disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, there were no changes to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect its internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION

 

FORM 10-Q

 

June 30, 2009

 

Part II - Other Information

 

Item 1. Legal proceedings

 

There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company or its subsidiaries is a party other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to their respective businesses.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 

There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in Item 1a. to Part I of the Company’s 2008 Form 10-K.

 

 

The following table provides information as of June 30, 2009 with respect to shares of common stock repurchased by the Company during the quarter then ended:

 

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities(a)

 

 

 

 

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

 

 

 

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

On April 14, 2009 the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders was held. At the meeting, the stockholders ratified the advisory vote on executive compensation, ratified the selection of Crowe Horwath LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2009, and Emily E. Pichon and Richard L. Pletcher were elected to serve as directors with terms expiring in 2012. Continuing as directors until 2010 are L. Craig Fulmer, Charles E. Niemier, Donald B. Steininger and Terry L. Tucker. Continuing as directors until 2011 are Robert E. Bartels, Jr., Thomas A. Hiatt, Michael L. Kubacki, Steven D. Ross and M. Scott Welch.

 

 

 

 

 

Item 5. Other Information

 

 

Item 6. Exhibits  

 

 

 

 

LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION

 

FORM 10-Q

 

June 30, 2009

 

Part II - Other Information

 

Signatures

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Registrant)