10-K


 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
 
 
x
 
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015
OR
¨
 
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from            to          
Commission File Number 1-10989
 
VENTAS, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
 
61-1055020
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
353 N. Clark Street, Suite 3300, Chicago, Illinois
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 
60654
(Zip Code)
(877) 483-6827
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
 
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, par value $0.25 per share
 
New York Stock Exchange
         Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
 
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes x    No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x    No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x    No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment of this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x
 
Accelerated filer ¨
 
Non-accelerated filer ¨
 (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨    No x
The aggregate market value of shares of the Registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on June 30, 2015, based on a closing price of the common stock of $62.09 as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, was $20.4 billion.  For purposes of the foregoing calculation only, all directors, executive officers and 10% beneficial owners of the Registrant have been deemed affiliates.
As of February 10, 2016, 336,070,352 shares of the Registrant’s common stock were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 10, 2016 are incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10 through 14 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 




CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS
Unless otherwise indicated or except where the context otherwise requires, the terms “we,” “us” and “our” and other similar terms in this Annual Report on Form 10-K refer to Ventas, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements regarding our or our tenants’, operators’, borrowers’ or managers’ expected future financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, funds from operations, dividends and dividend plans, financing opportunities and plans, capital markets transactions, business strategy, budgets, projected costs, operating metrics, capital expenditures, competitive positions, acquisitions, investment opportunities, dispositions, merger integration, growth opportunities, expected lease income, continued qualification as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”), plans and objectives of management for future operations, and statements that include words such as “anticipate,” “if,” “believe,” “plan,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “will,” and other similar expressions are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain, and actual results may differ from our expectations. We do not undertake a duty to update these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made.
Our actual future results and trends may differ materially from expectations depending on a variety of factors discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). These factors include without limitation:
The ability and willingness of our tenants, operators, borrowers, managers and other third parties to satisfy their obligations under their respective contractual arrangements with us, including, in some cases, their obligations to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless from and against various claims, litigation and liabilities;
The ability of our tenants, operators, borrowers and managers to maintain the financial strength and liquidity necessary to satisfy their respective obligations and liabilities to third parties, including without limitation obligations under their existing credit facilities and other indebtedness;
Our success in implementing our business strategy and our ability to identify, underwrite, finance, consummate and integrate diversifying acquisitions and investments;
Macroeconomic conditions such as a disruption of or lack of access to the capital markets, changes in the debt rating on U.S. government securities, default or delay in payment by the United States of its obligations, and changes in the federal or state budgets resulting in the reduction or nonpayment of Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement rates;
The nature and extent of future competition, including new construction in the markets in which our seniors housing communities and medical office buildings (“MOBs”) are located;
The extent of future or pending healthcare reform and regulation, including cost containment measures and changes in reimbursement policies, procedures and rates;
Increases in our borrowing costs as a result of changes in interest rates and other factors;
The ability of our tenants, operators and managers, as applicable, to comply with laws, rules and regulations in the operation of our properties, to deliver high-quality services, to attract and retain qualified personnel and to attract residents and patients;
Changes in general economic conditions or economic conditions in the markets in which we may, from time to time, compete, and the effect of those changes on our revenues, earnings and funding sources;
Our ability to pay down, refinance, restructure or extend our indebtedness as it becomes due;
Our ability and willingness to maintain our qualification as a REIT in light of economic, market, legal, tax and other considerations;
Final determination of our taxable net income for the year ended December 31, 2015 and for the year ending December 31, 2016;
The ability and willingness of our tenants to renew their leases with us upon expiration of the leases, our ability to reposition our properties on the same or better terms in the event of nonrenewal or in the event we exercise our right to replace an existing tenant, and obligations, including indemnification obligations, we may incur in connection with the replacement of an existing tenant;

i


Risks associated with our senior living operating portfolio, such as factors that can cause volatility in our operating income and earnings generated by those properties, including without limitation national and regional economic conditions, development of new, competing properties, costs of food, materials, energy, labor and services, employee benefit costs, insurance costs and professional and general liability claims, and the timely delivery of accurate property-level financial results for those properties;
Changes in exchange rates for any foreign currency in which we may, from time to time, conduct business;
Year-over-year changes in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) or the UK Retail Price Index and the effect of those changes on the rent escalators contained in our leases and on our earnings;
Our ability and the ability of our tenants, operators, borrowers and managers to obtain and maintain adequate property, liability and other insurance from reputable, financially stable providers;
The impact of increased operating costs and uninsured professional liability claims on our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations or that of our tenants, operators, borrowers and managers and our ability and the ability of our tenants, operators, borrowers and managers to accurately estimate the magnitude of those claims;
Risks associated with our MOB portfolio and operations, including our ability to successfully design, develop and manage MOBs and to retain key personnel;
The ability of the hospitals on or near whose campuses our MOBs are located and their affiliated health systems to remain competitive and financially viable and to attract physicians and physician groups;
Risks associated with our investments in joint ventures and unconsolidated entities, including our lack of sole decision-making authority and our reliance on our joint venture partners’ financial condition;
The impact of market or issuer events on the liquidity or value of our investments in marketable securities;
Consolidation in the seniors housing and healthcare industries resulting in a change of control of, or a competitor’s investment in, one or more of our tenants, operators, borrowers or managers or significant changes in the senior management of our tenants, operators, borrowers or managers;
The impact of litigation or any financial, accounting, legal or regulatory issues that may affect us or our tenants, operators, borrowers or managers; and
Changes in accounting principles, or their application or interpretation, and our ability to make estimates and the assumptions underlying the estimates, which could have an effect on our earnings.
Many of these factors, some of which are described in greater detail under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, are beyond our control and the control of our management.
Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred, Atria, Sunrise and Ardent Information
Each of Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Brookdale Senior Living”) and Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Kindred”) is subject to the reporting requirements of the SEC and is required to file with the SEC annual reports containing audited financial information and quarterly reports containing unaudited financial information. The information related to Brookdale Senior Living and Kindred contained or referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been derived from SEC filings made by Brookdale Senior Living or Kindred, as the case may be, or other publicly available information or was provided to us by Brookdale Senior Living or Kindred, and we have not verified this information through an independent investigation or otherwise. We have no reason to believe that this information is inaccurate in any material respect, but we cannot assure you of its accuracy. We are providing this data for informational purposes only, and you are encouraged to obtain Brookdale Senior Living’s and Kindred’s publicly available filings, which can be found on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Atria Senior Living, Inc. (“Atria”), Sunrise Senior Living, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Sunrise”) and Ardent Health Partners, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Ardent”) are not currently subject to the reporting requirements of the SEC. The information related to Atria, Sunrise and Ardent contained or referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been derived from publicly available information or was provided to us by Atria, Sunrise or Ardent, as the case may be, and we have not verified this information through an independent investigation or otherwise. We have no reason to believe that this information is inaccurate in any material respect, but we cannot assure you of its accuracy.

ii


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Mine Safety Disclosures


iii


PART I
ITEM 1.    Business
BUSINESS
Overview
Ventas, Inc., an S&P 500 company, is a REIT with a highly diversified portfolio of seniors housing and healthcare properties located throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. As of December 31, 2015, we owned approximately 1,300 properties (including properties classified as held for sale), consisting of seniors housing communities, MOBs, skilled nursing facilities, specialty hospitals and general acute care hospitals, and we had four properties under development. Our company was originally founded in 1983 and is currently headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.
We primarily invest in seniors housing and healthcare properties through acquisitions and lease our properties to unaffiliated tenants or operate them through independent third-party managers. As of December 31, 2015, we leased a total of 607 properties (excluding MOBs and properties classified as held for sale) to various healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures, and we engaged independent operators, such as Atria and Sunrise, to manage a total of 304 of our seniors housing communities (excluding properties classified as held for sale) for us pursuant to long-term management agreements. Our three largest tenants, Brookdale, Kindred and Ardent leased from us 140 properties (excluding six properties included in investments in unconsolidated real estate entities), 76 properties and ten properties, respectively, as of December 31, 2015.
Through our Lillibridge Healthcare Services, Inc. (“Lillibridge”) subsidiary and our ownership interest in PMB Real Estate Services LLC (“PMBRES”), we also provide MOB management, leasing, marketing, facility development and advisory services to highly rated hospitals and health systems throughout the United States. In addition, from time to time, we make secured and non-mortgage loans and other investments relating to seniors housing and healthcare operators or properties.
We operate through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and MOB operations. See our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes, including “Note 2—Accounting Policies,” included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Business Strategy
We aim to enhance shareholder value by delivering consistent, superior total returns through a strategy of: (1) generating reliable and growing cash flows; (2) maintaining a balanced, diversified portfolio of high-quality assets; and (3) preserving our financial strength, flexibility and liquidity.
Generating Reliable and Growing Cash Flows
Generating reliable and growing cash flows from our seniors housing and healthcare assets enables us to pay regular cash dividends to stockholders and creates opportunities to increase shareholder value through profitable investments. The combination of steady contractual growth from our long-term triple-net leases, steady, reliable cash flows from our loan investments and stable cash flows from our MOBs with the higher growth potential inherent in our seniors housing operating communities drives our ability to generate sustainable, growing cash flows that are resilient to economic downturns.
Maintaining a Balanced, Diversified Portfolio
We believe that maintaining a balanced portfolio of high-quality assets diversified by investment type, geographic location, asset type, tenant/operator, revenue source and operating model diminishes the risk that any single factor or event could materially harm our business. Portfolio diversification also enhances the reliability of our cash flows by reducing our exposure to any individual tenant, operator or manager and making us less susceptible to single-state regulatory or reimbursement changes, regional climate events and local economic downturns.
Preserving Our Financial Strength, Flexibility and Liquidity
A strong, flexible balance sheet and excellent liquidity position us favorably to capitalize on strategic growth opportunities in the seniors housing and healthcare industries through acquisitions, investments, and development and redevelopment projects. We maintain our financial strength to pursue profitable investment opportunities by actively managing our leverage, improving our cost of capital and preserving our access to multiple sources of liquidity, including unsecured bank debt, mortgage financings and public debt and equity markets.

1


2015 Highlights and Other Recent Developments
Investments and Dispositions
In January 2015, we acquired American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust, Inc. (“HCT”) in a stock and cash transaction, which added 152 properties to our portfolio, 20 of which were disposed of as part of the CCP Spin-Off. We funded the transaction through the issuance of approximately 28.4 million shares of our common stock at $78.00 per share and 1.1 million limited partnership units.

On August 4, 2015, we completed our acquisition of Ardent Medical Services, Inc. (“AHS”) and simultaneous separation and sale of the Ardent hospital operating company (Ardent Health Partners, LLC, together with its subsidiaries, “Ardent”) to a consortium composed of an entity controlled by Equity Group Investments, Ardent’s management team and us. As of the acquisition date, we recorded the estimated fair value of our investment in owned hospital and other real estate of approximately $1.3 billion. At closing, we paid $26.3 million for our 9.9% interest in Ardent, which represents our estimate of the acquisition date fair value of this interest. Upon closing, we entered into a long-term triple-net master lease with Ardent to operate hospitals and other real estate we acquired.

During 2015, we made other investments totaling approximately $611.7 million, including the acquisition of eleven triple-net leased properties; eleven MOBs; and 12 skilled nursing facilities (all of which were disposed of as part of the CCP Spin-Off (as defined below)).

During 2015, we sold 39 triple-net leased properties and 26 MOBs for aggregate consideration of $541.0 million, including a $6.0 million lease termination fee.

During 2015, we received aggregate proceeds of $173.8 million in final repayment of loans receivable and sales of bonds we held, and recognized gains aggregating $7.7 million.
Capital and Dividends
In January 2015, we issued and sold 3,750,202 shares of common stock under our previous “at-the-market” (“ATM”) equity offering program for aggregate net proceeds of $285.4 million, after sales agent commissions of $4.4 million. Through the remainder of 2015 and in the first quarter of 2016 we have issued and sold a total of 5,084,302 shares of our common stock under our ATM equity offering program for aggregate net proceeds of $297.0 million, after sales agent commissions of $4.5 million.

In January 2015, we issued and sold $1.1 billion of senior notes with a weighted average interest rate below 3.7% and a weighted average maturity of 15 years. The issuances were composed of $900 million aggregate principal amount of USD senior notes and CAD notes of 250 million.

In July 2015, we issued and sold $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.125% senior notes due 2026 at a public offering price equal to 99.218% of par, for total proceeds of $496.1 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.

In August 2015, we completed a $900 million five year term loan having a variable interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.0 basis points (the “Ardent Term Loan”). The term loan matures in 2020.

In 2015, we repaid $305.0 million of our unsecured term loan due 2019 and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $1.6 million representing a write-off of the then unamortized deferred financing fees. Also, in May 2015, we repaid in full, at par, $234.4 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 6% senior notes due 2015.

In 2015, we paid an annual cash dividend on our common stock of $3.04 per share. On August 17, 2015, we also distributed a stock dividend of one Care Capital Properties, Inc. (“CCP”) common share for every four shares of Ventas common stock held as of the distribution record date of August 10, 2015. The stock dividend was valued at $8.51 per Ventas share based on the opening price of CCP stock on its first day of regular-way trading on the New York Stock Exchange.

In February 2016, we entered into a $200 million notional amount interest rate swap with a maturity of August 3, 2020 that effectively converts LIBOR-based floating rate debt to fixed rate debt, setting LIBOR at 1.132% through the maturity date of the swap. The maturity date of the Ardent Term Loan is also August 3, 2020.

2


Spin-Off
In August 2015, we completed the spin off of most of our post-acute/skilled nursing facility portfolio into an independent, publicly traded REIT named Care Capital Properties, Inc. (the “CCP Spin-Off”). The historical results of operations of the CCP properties as well as the related assets and liabilities are presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Portfolio Summary
The following table summarizes our consolidated portfolio of properties and other investments (excluding properties included in discontinued operations during 2015 and properties classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2015) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real Estate Property Investments
 
Revenues (3)
Asset Type
 
# of
Properties(1)
 
# of
Units/
Sq. Ft./Beds
(2)
 
Real Estate Property Investment, at Cost
 
Percent of
Total Real Estate Property Investments
 
Real Estate
Property
Investment Per Unit/Bed/Sq. Ft.
 
Revenue
 
Percent of Total Revenues
 
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Seniors housing communities
 
768

 
66,985

 
$
16,105,062

 
65.3
%
 
$
240.4

 
$2,289,653
 
69.7
%
MOBs (4)
 
361

 
20,062,590

 
5,361,330

 
21.7

 
0.3

 
591,646

 
18.0

Skilled nursing facilities
 
53

 
6,279

 
358,329

 
1.5

 
57.1

 
72,820

 
2.2

Specialty hospitals
 
46

 
3,857

 
524,084

 
2.1

 
135.9

 
143,776

 
4.4

General acute care hospitals
 
12

 
2,034

 
1,453,649

 
5.9

 
714.7

 
59,229

 
1.8

Total properties
 
1,240

 
 
 
23,802,454

 
96.5

 
 
 
3,157,124

 
96.1

Secured loans receivable and investments, net
 
 
 
 
 
857,112

 
3.5

 
 
 
86,553

 
2.6

Interest and other income
 
 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 
1,052

 
0.0

Revenues related to assets classified as held for sale
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 
 
41,669

 
1.3

Total
 
 

 
 

 
$
24,659,566

 
100.0
%
 
 

 
$
3,286,398

 
100.0
%
(1)
As of December 31, 2015, we also owned 20 seniors housing communities, 14 skilled nursing facilities and seven MOBs through investments in unconsolidated entities, and we classified one seniors housing community, two skilled nursing facilities, and eight MOBs as held for sale. Our consolidated properties were located in 46 states, the District of Columbia, seven Canadian provinces and the United Kingdom and, excluding MOBs, were operated or managed by 68 unaffiliated healthcare operating companies, including the following publicly traded companies or their subsidiaries: Brookdale (141 properties) (excluding six properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities); Kindred (76 properties); 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. (12 properties); Capital Senior Living Corporation (12 properties); Spire Healthcare plc (three properties); and HealthSouth Corp. (four properties).
(2)
Seniors housing communities are measured in units; MOBs are measured by square footage; and skilled nursing facilities, specialty hospitals and general acute care hospitals are measured by bed count.
(3)
Total revenues exclude revenues attributable to properties included in discontinued operations during 2015.
(4)
As of December 31, 2015, we leased 67 of our consolidated MOBs pursuant to triple-net leases, Lillibridge or PMBRES managed 282 of our consolidated MOBs and 30 of our consolidated MOBs were managed by eleven unaffiliated managers. Through Lillibridge and PMBRES, we also provided management and leasing services for 79 MOBs owned by third parties as of December 31, 2015.
Seniors Housing and Healthcare Properties
As of December 31, 2015, we owned a total of 1,281 seniors housing and healthcare properties (excluding properties classified as held for sale), including through our investments in unconsolidated entities, as follows:
 
Consolidated
(100% interest)
 
Consolidated
(<100% interest)
 
Unconsolidated
(5-25% interest)
 
Total
Seniors housing communities
753

 
15

 
20

 
788

MOBs
327

 
34

 
7

 
368

Skilled nursing facilities
53

 

 
14

 
67

Specialty hospitals
45

 
1

 

 
46

General acute care hospitals
12

 

 

 
12

Total
1,190

 
50

 
41

 
1,281


3


Seniors Housing Communities
Our seniors housing communities include independent and assisted living communities, continuing care retirement communities and communities providing care for individuals with Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia or memory loss. These communities offer studio, one bedroom and two bedroom residential units on a month-to-month basis primarily to elderly individuals requiring various levels of assistance. Basic services for residents of these communities include housekeeping, meals in a central dining area and group activities organized by the staff with input from the residents. More extensive care and personal supervision, at additional fees, are also available for such needs as eating, bathing, grooming, transportation, limited therapeutic programs and medication administration, which allow residents certain conveniences and enable them to live as independently as possible according to their abilities. These services are often met by home health providers, close coordination with the resident’s physician and skilled nursing facilities. Charges for room, board and services are generally paid from private sources.
Medical Office Buildings
Typically, our MOBs are multi-tenant properties leased to several unrelated medical practices, although in many cases they may be associated with a large single specialty or multi-specialty group. Tenants include physicians, dentists, psychologists, therapists and other healthcare providers, who require space devoted to patient examination and treatment, diagnostic imaging, outpatient surgery and other outpatient services. MOBs are similar to commercial office buildings, although they require greater plumbing, electrical and mechanical systems to accommodate physicians’ requirements such as sinks in every room, brighter lights and specialized medical equipment. As of December 31, 2015, we owned or managed for third parties approximately 24 million square feet of MOBs that are predominantly located on or near an acute care hospital campus (“on campus”).
Skilled Nursing Facilities
Our skilled nursing facilities provide rehabilitative, restorative, skilled nursing and medical treatment for patients and residents who do not require the high technology, care-intensive, high cost setting of an acute care or rehabilitation hospital. Treatment programs include physical, occupational, speech, respiratory and other therapies, including sub-acute clinical protocols such as wound care and intravenous drug treatment. Charges for these services are generally paid from a combination of government reimbursement and private sources.
Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals
38 of our properties are operated as long-term acute care hospitals (“LTACs”). LTACs have a Medicare average length of stay of greater than 25 days and serve medically complex, chronically ill patients who require a high level of monitoring and specialized care, but whose conditions do not necessitate the continued services of an intensive care unit. The operators of these LTACs have the capability to treat patients who suffer from multiple systemic failures or conditions such as neurological disorders, head injuries, brain stem and spinal cord trauma, cerebral vascular accidents, chemical brain injuries, central nervous system disorders, developmental anomalies and cardiopulmonary disorders. Chronic patients often depend on technology for continued life support, such as mechanical ventilators, total parenteral nutrition, respiration or cardiac monitors and dialysis machines, and, due to their severe medical conditions, generally are not clinically appropriate for admission to a nursing facility or rehabilitation hospital. All of our LTACs are freestanding facilities, and we do not own any “hospitals within hospitals.” We also own two LTACs focused on providing children’s care and five rehabilitation LTACs devoted to the rehabilitation of patients with various neurological, musculoskeletal, orthopedic and other medical conditions following stabilization of their acute medical issues.
General Acute Care Hospitals
12 of our properties are operated as general acute care hospitals. General acute care hospitals provide medical and surgical services, including inpatient care, intensive care, cardiac care, diagnostic services and emergency services. These hospitals also provide outpatient services such as outpatient surgery, laboratory, radiology, respiratory therapy, cardiology and physical therapy. In the United States, these hospitals receive payments for patient services from the federal government primarily under the Medicare program, state governments under their respective Medicaid or similar programs, health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations, other private insurers, and directly from patients.
Geographic Diversification of Properties
Our portfolio of seniors housing and healthcare properties is broadly diversified by geographic location throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, with properties in only one state (California) accounting for more than 10% of our total revenues and total net operating income (“NOI,” which is defined as total revenues, excluding interest and other

4


income, less property-level operating expenses and medical office building services costs), in each case excluding amounts in discontinued operations, for the year ended December 31, 2015.
The following table shows our rental income and resident fees and services by geographic location for the year ended December 31, 2015:
 
Rental Income and
Resident Fees and
Services (1)
 
Percent of Total
Revenues (1)
 
 
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Geographic Location
 
 
 
 
California
$
505,702

 
15.4
%
 
New York
289,081

 
8.8

 
Texas
199,428

 
6.1

 
Illinois
160,468

 
4.9

 
Florida
150,572

 
4.6

 
Pennsylvania
118,226

 
3.6

 
Georgia
114,857

 
3.5

 
Arizona
98,296

 
3.0

 
New Jersey
93,608

 
2.9

 
Colorado
89,228

 
2.7

 
Other (36 states and the District of Columbia)
1,137,927

 
34.5

 
Total U.S
2,957,393

 
90.0
%
 
Canada (7 provinces)
173,737

 
5.3

 
United Kingdom
26,171

 
0.8

 
Total
$
3,157,301

 
96.1
%
(2)
    
(1)
This presentation excludes revenues from properties included in discontinued operations during 2015.
(2)
The remainder of our total revenues is medical office building and other services revenue, income from loans and investments and interest and other income.

5


The following table shows our NOI by geographic location for the year ended December 31, 2015:
 
NOI (1)
 
Percent of Total
NOI (1)
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Geographic Location
 
 
 
California
$
276,044

 
14.7
%
Texas
126,217

 
6.7

New York
112,966

 
6.0

Illinois
103,599

 
5.5

Florida
90,131

 
4.8

Pennsylvania
61,072

 
3.3

Arizona
54,441

 
2.9

North Carolina
52,217

 
2.8

Indiana
51,100

 
2.7

Wisconsin
50,917

 
2.7

Other (36 states and the District of Columbia)
786,695

 
41.9

Total U.S
1,765,399

 
94.0
%
Canada (7 provinces)
83,571

 
4.5

United Kingdom
26,171

 
1.4

Total
$
1,875,141

 
99.9
%
    
(1)
This presentation excludes NOI from properties included in discontinued operations during 2015.
See “Note 20—Segment Information” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding the geographic diversification of our portfolio.
Certificates of Need
Our skilled nursing facilities and hospitals are generally subject to federal, state and local licensure statutes and statutes that may require regulatory approval, in the form of a certificate of need (“CON”) issued by a governmental agency with jurisdiction over healthcare facilities, prior to the expansion of existing facilities, construction of new facilities, addition of beds, acquisition of major equipment or introduction of new services. CON requirements, which are not uniform throughout the United States, may restrict our or our operators’ ability to expand our properties in certain circumstances.
The following table shows the percentages of our rental income (excluding amounts in discontinued operations) for the year ended December 31, 2015 that are derived by skilled nursing facilities and hospitals in states with and without CON requirements:
 
Skilled
Nursing
Facilities
 
Hospitals
 
Total
States with CON requirements
57.5
%
 
144.4
 %
 
96.5
%
States without CON requirements
42.5

 
(44.4
)
 
3.5

Total
100.0
%
 
100.0
 %
 
100.0
%
Loans and Investments
As of December 31, 2015, we had $895.0 million of net loans receivable and investments relating to seniors housing and healthcare operators or properties. Our loans receivable and investments provide us with interest income, principal amortization and transaction fees and are typically secured by mortgage liens or leasehold mortgages on the underlying properties and corporate or personal guarantees by affiliates of the borrowing entity. In some cases, the loans are secured by a pledge of ownership interests in the entity or entities that own the related seniors housing or healthcare properties. From time to time, we also make investments in mezzanine loans, which are subordinated to senior secured loans held by other investors that

6


encumber the same real estate. See “Note 6—Loans Receivable and Investments” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Development and Redevelopment Projects
We are party to certain agreements that obligate us to develop seniors housing or healthcare properties funded through capital that we and, in certain circumstances, our joint venture partners provide. As of December 31, 2015, we had four properties under development pursuant to these agreements. In addition, from time to time, we engage in redevelopment projects with respect to our existing seniors housing communities to maximize the value, increase NOI, maintain a market-competitive position, achieve property stabilization or change the primary use of the property.
Segment Information
We evaluate our operating performance and allocate resources based on three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties; senior living operations; and MOB operations. Non-segment assets, classified as “all other,” consist primarily of corporate assets, including cash, restricted cash, deferred financing costs, loans receivable and investments, and miscellaneous accounts receivable. For further information regarding our business segments, see “Note 20—Segment Information” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Significant Tenants, Operators and Managers
The following table summarizes certain information regarding our tenant, operator and manager concentration as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 (excluding properties classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2015 and properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities):
 
Number of
Properties
Leased or
Managed
 
Percent of Total Real Estate Investments (1)
 
Percent of Total Revenues
 
Percent of NOI
Senior living operations
304

 
34.4
%
 
55.1
%
 
32.1
%
Brookdale Senior Living (2)
140

 
8.5

 
5.3

 
9.3

Kindred
76

 
2.1

 
5.6

 
9.8

Ardent
10

 
5.3

 
1.3

 
2.3

    
(1)
Based on gross book value.
(2)
Excludes six properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and one property managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to a long-term management agreement.
Triple-Net Leased Properties
Each of our leases with Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred and Ardent is a triple-net lease that obligates the tenant to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures, and to comply with the terms of the mortgage financing documents, if any, affecting the properties. In addition, each of our Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred and Ardent leases has a corporate guaranty. Brookdale Senior Living and Kindred have multiple leases with us and those leases contain cross-default provisions tied to each other, as well as bundled lease renewals (as described in more detail below).
The properties we lease to Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred and Ardent accounted for a significant portion of our triple-net leased properties segment revenues and NOI for the year ended December 31, 2015. If any of Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred or Ardent becomes unable or unwilling to satisfy its obligations to us or to renew its leases with us upon expiration of the terms thereof, our financial condition and results of operations could decline and our ability to service our indebtedness and to make distributions to our stockholders could be impaired. We cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred and Ardent will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable them to satisfy their respective obligations to us, and any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred or Ardent to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity and our ability to service our indebtedness and other obligations and to make distributions to our stockholders, as required for us to continue to qualify as a REIT (a “Material Adverse Effect”). We also cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred and Ardent will elect to renew their respective leases with us upon expiration of the leases or that we will be able to reposition any non-renewed properties on a timely basis or on the same or better economic terms, if at all. See “Risks Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Our leases with Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred and Ardent account for a significant portion of our triple-net leased properties segment revenues and operating income; Any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred or Ardent

7


to satisfy its obligations under our agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” included in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Brookdale Senior Living Leases
As of December 31, 2015, we leased 140 properties (excluding six properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and one property managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to a long-term management agreement) to Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to multiple lease agreements.
Pursuant to our lease agreements, Brookdale Senior Living is obligated to pay base rent, which escalates annually at a specified rate over the prior period base rent. As of December 31, 2015, the aggregate 2016 contractual cash rent due to us from Brookdale Senior Living, excluding variable interest that Brookdale Senior Living is obligated to pay as additional rent based on certain floating rate mortgage debt, was approximately $170.9 million, and the current aggregate contractual base rent (computed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”)) due to us from Brookdale Senior Living, excluding the variable interest, was approximately $160.6 million (in each case, excluding six properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities as of December 31, 2015). See “Note 3—Concentration of Credit Risk” and “Note 14—Commitments and Contingencies” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Kindred Leases
As of December 31, 2015, we leased 76 properties to Kindred pursuant to multiple lease agreements. The properties leased pursuant to our Kindred master leases are grouped into bundles, or “renewal groups,” with each renewal group containing a varying number of geographically diversified properties. All properties within a single renewal group have the same current lease term of five to 12 years, and each renewal group is currently subject to one or more successive five-year renewal terms at Kindred’s option, provided certain conditions are satisfied. Kindred’s renewal option is “all or nothing” with respect to the properties contained in each renewal group.
The aggregate annual rent we receive under each Kindred master lease is referred to as “base rent.” Base rent escalates annually at a specified rate over the prior period base rent, contingent, in the case of the remaining three original Kindred master leases, upon the satisfaction of specified facility revenue parameters. The annual rent escalator under two Kindred master leases is 2.7%, and the annual rent escalator under the other two Kindred master leases is based on year-over-year changes in CPI, subject to floors and caps.
In December 2014, we entered into favorable agreements with Kindred to transition or sell the operations of nine licensed healthcare assets, make modifications to the master leases governing 34 leased assets, and reimburse us for certain deferred capital expenditures at skilled nursing facilities previously transferred to new operators. In January 2015, Kindred paid us $37 million in connection with these agreements, which is being amortized over the remaining lease term for the 34 assets governed by the modified master leases. We own or have the rights to all licenses and CONs at the nine properties to be transitioned or sold, and Kindred has extensive and detailed obligations to cooperate and ensure an orderly transition of the properties to another operator. As of December 31, 2015, four of the nine properties have been sold and three of the nine properties were disposed of as part of the CCP Spin-Off.
Ardent Lease
As of December 31, 2015, we leased ten hospital campuses to Ardent pursuant to a single, triple-net master lease agreement. Pursuant to our master lease agreement, Ardent is obligated to pay base rent, which escalates annually by the lesser of four times the increase in the consumer price index for the relevant period and 2.5%.  The initial term of the master lease expires on August 31, 2035 and Ardent has one ten-year renewal option.
As of December 31, 2015, the aggregate 2016 contractual cash rent due to us from Ardent, was approximately $105.0 million, and the current aggregate contractual base rent (computed in accordance with GAAP) due to us from Ardent was approximately $105.0 million. 
Senior Living Operations
As of December 31, 2015, Atria and Sunrise, collectively, provided comprehensive property management and accounting services with respect to 268 seniors housing communities included in our senior living operations reportable business segment, for which we pay annual management fees pursuant to long-term management agreements. Most of our management agreements with Atria have initial terms expiring either July 31, 2024 or December 31, 2027, with successive automatic ten-year renewal periods. The management fees payable to Atria under most of the Atria management agreements range from 4.5% to 5% of revenues generated by the applicable properties, and Atria can earn up to an additional 1% of revenues based on the achievement of specified performance targets. Most of our management agreements with Sunrise have terms ranging from 25

8


to 30 years (which commenced as early as 2004 and as recently as 2012). The management fees payable to Sunrise under the Sunrise management agreements range from 5% to 7% of revenues generated by the applicable properties. See “Note 3—Concentration of Credit Risk” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Because Atria and Sunrise manage our properties in exchange for the receipt of a management fee from us, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants. However, we rely on our managers’ personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations efficiently and effectively. We also rely on our managers to set appropriate resident fees and to otherwise operate our seniors housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, including various rights to terminate and exercise remedies under those agreements as provided therein, Atria’s or Sunrise’s failure, inability or unwillingness to satisfy its respective obligations under those agreements, to efficiently and effectively manage our properties or to provide timely and accurate accounting information with respect thereto could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. In addition, significant changes in Atria’s or Sunrise’s senior management or equity ownership or any adverse developments in their businesses and affairs or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—The properties managed by Atria and Sunrise account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; Adverse developments in Atria’s or Sunrise’s business and affairs or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” and “—We have rights to terminate our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise in whole or with respect to specific properties under certain circumstances, and we may be unable to replace Atria or Sunrise if our management agreements are terminated or not renewed” included in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our 34% ownership interest in Atria entitles us to certain rights and minority protections, as well as the right to appoint two of five members on the Atria board of directors.
Competition
We generally compete for investments in seniors housing and healthcare assets with publicly traded, private and non-listed healthcare REITs, real estate partnerships, healthcare providers, healthcare lenders and other investors, including developers, banks, insurance companies, pension funds, government-sponsored entities and private equity firms, some of whom may have greater financial resources and lower costs of capital than we do. Increased competition challenges our ability to identify and successfully capitalize on opportunities that meet our objectives, which is affected by, among other factors, the availability of suitable acquisition or investment targets, our ability to negotiate acceptable transaction terms and our access to and cost of capital. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Our pursuit of investments in and acquisitions of, or our development or redevelopment of, seniors housing and healthcare assets may be unsuccessful or fail to meet our expectations” included in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and “Note 10—Borrowing Arrangements” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our tenants, operators and managers also compete on a local and regional basis with other healthcare operating companies that provide comparable services. Seniors housing community, skilled nursing facility and hospital operators compete to attract and retain residents and patients to our properties based on scope and quality of care, reputation and financial condition, price, location and physical appearance of the properties, services offered, qualified personnel, physician referrals and family preferences. With respect to MOBs, we and our third-party managers compete to attract and retain tenants based on many of the same factors, in addition to quality of the affiliated health system, physician preferences and proximity to hospital campuses. The ability of our tenants, operators and managers to compete successfully could be affected by private, federal and state reimbursement programs and other laws and regulations. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Our tenants, operators and managers may be adversely affected by healthcare regulation and enforcement” and “—Changes in the reimbursement rates or methods of payment from third-party payors, including the Medicare and Medicaid programs, could have a material adverse effect on certain of our tenants and operators and on us” included in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Employees
As of December 31, 2015, we had 466 employees, including 258 employees associated with our MOB operations reportable business segment, but excluding 1,319 employees at our Canadian seniors housing communities under the supervision and control of our independent managers. Although the applicable manager is responsible for hiring and maintaining the labor force at each of our Canadian seniors housing communities, we bear many of the costs and risks generally borne by employers, particularly with respect to those properties with unionized labor. None of our employees is subject to a collective bargaining agreement, other than those employees in the Canadian seniors housing communities managed by Sunrise or Atria. We believe that relations with our employees are positive. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—

9


Our operating assets expose us to various operational risks, liabilities and claims that could adversely affect our ability to generate revenues or increase our costs and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” included in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Insurance
We maintain or require in our lease, management and other agreements that our tenants, operators and managers maintain all applicable lines of insurance on our properties and their operations. We believe that the amount and scope of insurance coverage provided by our policies and the policies required to be maintained by our tenants, operators and managers are customary for similarly situated companies in our industry. Although we regularly monitor our tenants’, operators’ and managers’ compliance with their respective insurance requirements, we cannot assure you that they will maintain the required insurance coverages, and any failure, inability or unwillingness by our tenants, operators and managers to do so could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. We also cannot assure you that we will continue to require the same levels of insurance coverage under our lease, management and other agreements, that such insurance coverage will be available at a reasonable cost in the future or that the policies maintained will fully cover all losses related to our properties upon the occurrence of a catastrophic event, nor can we assure you of the future financial viability of the insurers.
We maintain the property insurance for all of our senior living operations, as well as the general and professional liability insurance for our seniors housing communities and related operations managed by Atria. However, Sunrise maintains the general and professional liability insurance for our seniors housing communities and related operations that it manages in accordance with the terms of our management agreements. Under our management agreements with Sunrise, we may elect, on an annual basis, whether we or Sunrise will bear responsibility for maintaining the required insurance coverage for the applicable properties, but the costs of such insurance are facility expenses paid from the revenues of those properties, regardless of who maintains the insurance.
Through our MOB operations, we provide engineering, construction and architectural services in connection with new development projects, and any design, construction or systems failures related to the properties we develop could result in substantial injury or damage to our clients or third parties. Any such injury or damage claims may arise in the ordinary course and may be asserted with respect to ongoing or completed projects. Although we maintain liability insurance to protect us against these claims, if any claim results in a loss, we cannot assure you that our policy limits would be adequate to cover the loss in full. If we sustain losses in excess of our insurance coverage, we may be required to pay the difference and we could lose our investment in, or experience reduced profits and cash flows from, the affected MOB, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
For various reasons, including to reduce and manage costs, many healthcare companies utilize different organizational and corporate structures coupled with self-insurance trusts or captive programs that may provide less coverage than a traditional insurance policy. As a result, companies that self-insure could incur large funded and unfunded general and professional liability expenses, which could have a material adverse effect on their liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. The implementation of a trust or captive by any of our tenants, operators or managers could adversely affect such person’s ability to satisfy its obligations under, or otherwise comply with the terms of, its respective lease, management and other agreements with us, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. Likewise, if we decide to implement a captive or self-insurance program, any large funded and unfunded general and professional liability expenses that we incur could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Additional Information
We maintain a website at www.ventasreit.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and our web address is included as an inactive textual reference only.
We make available, free of charge, through our website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. In addition, our Guidelines on Governance, our Global Code of Ethics and Business Conduct (including waivers from and amendments to that document) and the charters for each of our Audit and Compliance, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Executive Compensation Committees are available on our website, and we will mail copies of the foregoing documents to stockholders, free of charge, upon request to our Corporate Secretary at Ventas, Inc., 353 North Clark Street, Suite 3300, Chicago, Illinois 60654.

10


GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION
Healthcare Regulation
Overview
Our tenants, operators and managers are typically subject to extensive and complex federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to quality of care, licensure and certificate of need, government reimbursement, fraud and abuse practices, qualifications of personnel, adequacy of plant and equipment, and other laws and regulations governing the operation of healthcare facilities. We expect that the healthcare industry will, in general, continue to face increased regulation and pressure in these areas. The applicable rules are wide-ranging and can subject our tenants, operators and managers to civil, criminal, and administrative sanctions, including: the possible loss of accreditation or license; denial of reimbursement; imposition of fines; suspension, decertification, or exclusion from federal and state healthcare programs; or facility closure. Changes in laws or regulations, reimbursement policies, enforcement activity and regulatory non-compliance by tenants, operators and managers can all have a significant effect on their operations and financial condition, which in turn may adversely impact us, as detailed below and set forth under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Although the properties within our portfolio may be subject to varying levels of governmental scrutiny, we expect that the healthcare industry, in general, will continue to face increased regulation and pressure in the areas of fraud, waste and abuse, cost control, healthcare management and provision of services, among others. We also expect that efforts by third-party payors, such as the federal Medicare program, state Medicaid programs and private insurance carriers (including health maintenance organizations and other health plans), to impose greater discounts and more stringent cost controls upon operators (through changes in reimbursement rates and methodologies, discounted fee structures, the assumption by healthcare providers of all or a portion of the financial risk or otherwise) will intensify and continue. A significant expansion of applicable federal, state or local laws and regulations, existing or future healthcare reform measures, new interpretations of existing laws and regulations, changes in enforcement priorities, or significant limits on the scope of services reimbursed or reductions in reimbursement rates could have a material adverse effect on certain of our operators’ liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and, in turn, their ability to satisfy their contractual obligations, including making rental payments under and otherwise complying with the terms of our leases.
Licensure, Certification and CONs
In general, the operators of our skilled nursing facilities and hospitals must be licensed and periodically certified through various regulatory agencies that determine compliance with federal, state and local laws to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Legal requirements pertaining to such licensure and certification relate to the quality of medical care provided by the operator, qualifications of the operator’s administrative personnel and clinical staff, adequacy of the physical plant and equipment and continuing compliance with applicable laws and regulations. A loss of licensure or certification could adversely affect a skilled nursing facility or hospital operator’s ability to receive payments from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, which, in turn, could adversely affect its ability to satisfy its obligations to us.
In addition, many of our skilled nursing facilities and hospitals are subject to state CON laws that require governmental approval prior to the development or expansion of healthcare facilities and services. The approval process in these states generally requires a facility to demonstrate the need for additional or expanded healthcare facilities or services. CONs, where applicable, are also sometimes necessary for changes in ownership or control of licensed facilities, addition of beds, investment in major capital equipment, introduction of new services or termination of services previously approved through the CON process. CON laws and regulations may restrict an operator’s ability to expand our properties and grow its business in certain circumstances, which could have an adverse effect on the operator’s revenues and, in turn, its ability to make rental payments under and otherwise comply with the terms of our leases. See “Risk Factors-Risks Arising from Our Business-If we must replace any of our tenants or operators, we might be unable to reposition the properties on as favorable terms, or at all, and we could be subject to delays, limitations and expenses, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Compared to skilled nursing facilities and hospitals, seniors housing communities (other than those that receive Medicaid payments) do not receive significant funding from governmental healthcare programs and are subject to relatively few, if any, federal regulations. Instead, to the extent they are regulated, such regulation consists primarily of state and local laws governing licensure, provision of services, staffing requirements and other operational matters, which vary greatly from one jurisdiction to another. Although recent growth in the U.S. seniors housing industry has attracted the attention of various federal agencies that believe more federal regulation of these properties is necessary, Congress thus far has deferred to state regulation of seniors housing communities. However, as a result of this growth and increased federal scrutiny, some states have revised and strengthened their regulation of seniors housing communities, and more states are expected to do the same in the future.

11


Fraud and Abuse Enforcement
Skilled nursing facilities, hospitals and senior housing communities that receive Medicaid payments are subject to various complex federal, state and local laws and regulations that govern healthcare providers' relationships and arrangements and prohibit fraudulent and abusive business practices. These laws and regulations include, among others:
Federal and state false claims acts, which, among other things, prohibit healthcare providers from filing false claims or making false statements to receive payment from Medicare, Medicaid or other governmental healthcare programs;
Federal and state anti-kickback and fee-splitting statutes, including the Medicare and Medicaid anti-kickback statute, which prohibit the payment, receipt or solicitation of any remuneration to induce referrals of patients for items or services covered by a governmental healthcare program, including Medicare and Medicaid;
Federal and state physician self-referral laws, including the federal Stark Law, which generally prohibits physicians from referring patients enrolled in certain governmental healthcare programs to providers of certain designated health services in which the referring physician or an immediate family member of the referring physician has an ownership or other financial interest;
The federal Civil Monetary Penalties Law, which authorizes the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) to impose civil penalties administratively for fraudulent acts; and
State and federal data privacy and security laws, including the privacy and security rules of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), which provide for the privacy and security of certain individually identifiable health information.

Violating these healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations may result in criminal and civil penalties, such as punitive sanctions, damage assessments, monetary penalties, imprisonment, denial of Medicare and Medicaid payments, and exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The responsibility for enforcing these laws and regulations lies with a variety or federal, state and local governmental agencies, however they can also be enforced by private litigants through federal and state false claims acts and other laws that allow private individuals to bring whistleblower suits known as qui tam actions.
Congress has significantly increased funding to the governmental agencies charged with enforcing the healthcare fraud and abuse laws to facilitate increased audits, investigations and prosecutions of providers suspected of healthcare fraud. As a result, government investigations and enforcement actions brought against healthcare providers have increased significantly in recent years and are expected to continue. A violation of federal or state anti-fraud and abuse laws or regulations by an operator of our properties could have a material adverse effect on the operator’s liquidity, financial condition or results of operations, which could adversely affect its ability to satisfy its contractual obligations, including making rental payments under and otherwise complying with the terms of our leases.
Reimbursement
The majority of skilled nursing facilities reimbursement, and a significant percentage of hospital reimbursement, is through Medicare and Medicaid. Medical buildings and other healthcare related properties have provider tenants that participate in Medicare and Medicaid. These programs are often their largest source of funding. Seniors housing communities generally do not receive funding from Medicare or Medicaid, but their ability to retain their residents is impacted by policy decisions and initiatives established by the administrators of Medicare and Medicaid. The passage of the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) in 2010 allowed formerly uninsured Americans to acquire coverage and utilize additional health care services. In addition, the ACA gave the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services new authorities to implement Medicaid waiver and pilot programs that impact healthcare and long term custodial care reimbursement by Medicare and Medicaid. These activities promote “aging in place”, allowing senior citizens to stay longer in seniors housing communities, and diverting or delaying their admission into skilled nursing facilities. The potential risks that accompany these regulatory and market changes are discussed below.
As a result of the ACA, and specifically Medicaid expansion and establishment of Health Insurance Exchanges providing subsidized health insurance, an estimated seventeen million more Americans have health insurance. These newly-insured Americans utilize services delivered by providers at medical buildings and other healthcare facilities. The ACA remains controversial and continued attempts to repeal or reverse aspects of the law could result in insured individuals losing coverage, and consequently foregoing services offered by provider tenants in medical buildings and other healthcare facilities.


12


Enabled by the Medicare Modernization Act (2003) and subsequent laws, Medicare and Medicaid have implemented pilot programs (officially termed demonstrations or models) to “divert” elderly from skilled nursing facilitates and promote “aging in place” in “the least restrictive environment.” Several states have implemented Home and Community-based Medicaid waiver programs that increase the support services available to senior citizens in senior housing, lengthening the time that many seniors can live outside of a skilled nursing facility. These Medicaid waiver programs are subject to re-approval and pilots are time-limited. Roll-back or expiration of these programs could have an adverse effect on the senior housing market.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is currently in the midst of transitioning Medicare from a traditional fee for service reimbursement model to capitated, value-based, and bundled payment approaches in which the government pays a set amount for each beneficiary for a defined period of time, based on that person’s underlying medical needs, rather than the actual services provided. The result is increasing use of management tools to oversee individual providers and coordinate their services. This puts downward pressure on the number and expense of services provided. Roughly eight million Medicare beneficiaries now receive care via Accountable Care Organizations, and Medicare Advantage health plans now provide care for roughly seventeen million Medicare beneficiaries. The continued trend toward capitated, value-based, and bundled payment approaches has the potential diminish the market for certain healthcare providers, particularly specialist physicians and providers of particular diagnostic technologies such Medical Resonance Imaging services. This could adversely impact the medical properties that house these physicians and medical technology providers.

The majority of Medicare payments continue to be made through traditional Medicare Part A and Part B fee-for-service schedules. The Medicare and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (“MACRA”) addresses the risk of a Sustainable Growth Rate cut in Medicare payments for physician services. However, other annual Medicare payment regulations, particularly with respect to certain hospitals, skilled nursing care, and home health services have resulted in lower net pay increases than providers of those services have often expected. In addition, MACRA establishes a multi-year transition into pay-for-quality approaches for Medicare physicians and other providers. This will include payment reductions for providers who do not meet government quality standards. The implementation of pay-for-quality models is expected to produce funding disparities that could adversely impact some provider tenants in medical buildings and other health care properties.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, approximately 11% of our total revenues and 19% of our total NOI (in each case excluding amounts in discontinued operations) were attributable to skilled nursing facilities and hospitals in which our third-party tenants receive reimbursement for their services under governmental healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. We are neither a participant in, nor a direct recipient of, any reimbursement under these programs with respect to those leased facilities.
Environmental Regulation
As an owner of real property, we are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding environmental, health and safety matters.
These laws and regulations address, among other things, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, fuel oil management, wastewater discharges, air emissions, radioactive materials, medical wastes, and hazardous wastes, and, in certain cases, the costs of complying with these laws and regulations and the penalties for non-compliance can be substantial. With respect to our properties that are operated or managed by third parties, we may be held primarily or jointly and severally liable for costs relating to the investigation and clean-up of any property from which there is or has been an actual or threatened release of a regulated material and any other affected properties, regardless of whether we knew of or caused the release. Such costs typically are not limited by law or regulation and could exceed the property’s value. In addition, we may be liable for certain other costs, such as governmental fines and injuries to persons, property or natural resources, as a result of any such actual or threatened release. See “Risk Factors-Risks Arising from Our Business-We could incur substantial liabilities and costs if any of our properties are found to be contaminated with hazardous substances or we become involved in any environmental disputes” included in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Under the terms of our lease, management and other agreements, we generally have a right to indemnification by the tenants, operators and managers of our properties for any contamination caused by them. However, we cannot assure you that our tenants, operators and managers will have the financial capability or willingness to satisfy their respective indemnification obligations to us, and any failure, inability or unwillingness to do so may require us to satisfy the underlying environmental claims.

13


In general, we have also agreed to indemnify our tenants and operators against any environmental claims (including penalties and clean-up costs) resulting from any condition arising in, on or under, or relating to, the leased properties at any time before the applicable lease commencement date. With respect to our senior living operating portfolio, we have agreed to indemnify our managers against any environmental claims (including penalties and clean- up costs) resulting from any condition on those properties, unless the manager caused or contributed to that condition.
We did not make any material capital expenditures in connection with environmental, health, and safety laws, ordinances and regulations in 2015 and do not expect that we will be required to make any such material capital expenditures during 2016.
Canada
In Canada, seniors housing communities are currently generally subject to significantly less regulation than skilled nursing facilities and hospitals, and the regulation of such facilities is principally a matter of provincial and municipal jurisdiction. As a result, the regulatory regimes that apply to seniors housing communities vary depending on the province (and in certain circumstances, the city) in which a facility is located. Recently, certain Canadian provinces have taken steps to implement regulatory measures that could result in enhanced regulation for seniors housing communities in such provinces.
CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS

The following discussion summarizes certain U.S. federal income tax considerations that may be relevant to you as a holder of our stock. It is not tax advice, nor does it purport to address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be important to particular stockholders in light of their personal circumstances or to certain types of stockholders, such as insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations (except to the extent discussed below under “-Treatment of Tax-Exempt Stockholders”), financial institutions, pass-through entities (or investors in such entities) or broker-dealers, and non-U.S. individuals and entities (except to the extent discussed below under “-Special Tax Considerations for Non-U.S. Stockholders”), that may be subject to special rules.
The statements in this section are based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), U.S. Treasury Regulations, Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) rulings, and judicial decisions now in effect, all of which are subject to change or different interpretation, possibly with retroactive effect. The laws governing the U.S. federal income tax treatment of REITs and their stockholders are highly technical and complex, and this discussion is qualified in its entirety by the authorities listed above. We cannot assure you that new laws, interpretations of law or court decisions will not cause any statement herein to be inaccurate.
Federal Income Taxation of Ventas

We elected REIT status beginning with the year ended December 31, 1999. We believe that we have satisfied the requirements to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for all tax years starting in 1999, and we intend to continue to do so. By qualifying for taxation as a REIT, we generally are not subject to federal income tax on net income that we currently distribute to stockholders, which substantially eliminates the “double taxation” (i.e., taxation at both the corporate and stockholder levels) that results from investment in a C corporation (i.e., a corporation generally subject to full corporate-level tax).
Notwithstanding such qualification, we are subject to federal income tax on any undistributed taxable income, including undistributed net capital gains, at regular corporate rates. In addition, we are subject to a 4% excise tax if we do not satisfy specific REIT distribution requirements. See “-Requirements for Qualification as a REIT-Annual Distribution Requirements.” Under certain circumstances, we may be subject to the “alternative minimum tax” on our undistributed items of tax preference. If we have net income from the sale or other disposition of “foreclosure property” (as described below) held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business or certain other non-qualifying income from foreclosure property, we are subject to tax at the highest corporate rate on that income. See “-Requirements for Qualification as a REIT-Foreclosure Property.” In addition, if we have net income from “prohibited transactions” (which are, in general, certain sales or other dispositions of property (other than foreclosure property) held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business), that income is subject to a 100% tax.
We also may be subject to “Built-in Gains Tax” on any appreciated asset that we own or acquire that was previously owned by a C corporation. If we dispose of any such asset and recognize gain on the disposition during the five-year period immediately after the asset was owned by a C corporation (either prior to our REIT election, or through stock acquisition or merger), then we generally are subject to regular corporate income tax on the gain equal to the lesser of the recognized gain at the time of disposition or the built-in gain in that asset as of the date it became a REIT asset.

14


If we fail to satisfy either of the gross income tests for qualification as a REIT (as discussed below), but maintain such qualification under the relief provisions of the Code, we will be subject to a 100% tax on the gross income attributable to the amount by which we failed the applicable test, multiplied by a fraction intended to reflect our profitability. In addition, if we violate one or more of the REIT asset tests (as discussed below), we may avoid a loss of our REIT status if we qualify under certain relief provisions and, among other things, pay a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or the highest corporate tax rate multiplied by the net income generated by the non-qualifying asset during a specified period. If we fail to satisfy any requirement for REIT qualification, other than the gross income or assets tests mentioned above, but maintain such qualification by meeting certain other requirements, we may be subject to a $50,000 penalty for each failure. Finally, we will incur a 100% excise tax on the income derived from certain transactions with a taxable REIT subsidiary (including rental income derived from leasing properties to a taxable REIT subsidiary) that are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis.
See “-Requirements for Qualification as a REIT” below for other circumstances in which we may be required to pay federal taxes.
Requirements for Qualification as a REIT

To qualify as a REIT, we must meet the requirements discussed below relating to our organization, sources of income, nature of assets and distributions of income to our stockholders.
Organizational Requirements

The Code defines a REIT as a corporation, trust or association: (i) that is managed by one or more directors or trustees; (ii) the beneficial ownership of which is evidenced by transferable shares or by transferable certificates of beneficial interest; (iii) that would be taxable as a domestic corporation but for Sections 856 through 859 of the Code; (iv) that is neither a financial institution nor an insurance company subject to certain provisions of the Code; (v) the beneficial ownership of which is held by 100 or more persons during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months, or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year (the “100 Shareholder Rule”); (vi) not more than 50% in value of the outstanding stock of which is owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code to include certain entities) during the last half of each taxable year (the “5/50 Rule”); (vii) that makes an election to be a REIT (or has made such election for a prior taxable year) and satisfies all relevant filing and other administrative requirements established by the IRS that must be met in order to elect and to maintain REIT status; (viii) that uses a calendar year for federal income tax purposes; and (ix) that meets certain other tests, described below, regarding the nature of its income and assets.
We believe, but cannot assure you, that we have satisfied and will continue to satisfy the organizational requirements for qualification as a REIT. Although our certificate of incorporation contains certain limits on the ownership of our stock that are intended to prevent us from failing the 5/50 Rule or the 100 Shareholder Rule, we cannot assure you as to the effectiveness of those limits.
To qualify as a REIT, a corporation also may not have (as of the end of the taxable year) any earnings and profits that were accumulated in periods before it elected REIT status or that are from acquired non-REIT corporations. We believe that we have not had any accumulated earnings and profits that are attributable to non-REIT periods or from acquired corporations that were not REITs, although the IRS is entitled to challenge that determination.
Gross Income Tests

We must satisfy two annual gross income requirements to qualify as a REIT:
At least 75% of our gross income (excluding gross income from prohibited transactions) for each taxable year must consist of defined types of income derived directly or indirectly from investments relating to real property or mortgages on real property (including pledges of equity interest in certain entities holding real property and also including “rents from real property” (as defined in the Code)) and, in certain circumstances, interest on certain types of temporary investment income; and

At least 95% of our gross income (excluding gross income from prohibited transactions) for each taxable year must be derived from such real property or temporary investments, dividends, interest and gain from the sale or disposition of stock or securities, or from any combination of the foregoing.

We believe, but cannot assure you, that we have been and will continue to be in compliance with these gross income tests. If we fail to satisfy one or both tests for any taxable year, we nevertheless may qualify as a REIT for that year if we qualify

15


under certain relief provisions of the Code, in which case we would be subject to a 100% tax on the gross income attributable to the amount by which we failed the applicable test. If we fail to satisfy one or both tests and do not qualify under the relief provisions for any taxable year, we will not qualify as a REIT for that year, which would have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Asset Tests

At the close of each quarter of our taxable year, we must satisfy the following tests relating to the nature of our assets:
At least 75% of the value of our total assets must be represented by cash or cash items (including certain receivables), government securities, “real estate assets” (including interests in real property and in mortgages on real property and shares in other qualifying REITs) (for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2015, the term “real estate assets” also includes (i) unsecured debt instruments of REITs that are required to file annual and periodic reports with the SEC under the Exchange Act (“Publicly Offered REITs”) (ii) personal property securing a mortgage secured by both real property and personal property if the fair market value of such personal property does not exceed 15% of the combined fair market value of all such personal and real property and (iii) personal property leased in connection with a lease of real property for which the rent attributable to personal property is not greater than 15% of the total rent received under the lease) or, in cases where we raise new capital through stock or long-term (i.e., having a maturity of at least five years) debt offerings, temporary investments in stock or debt instruments during the one-year period following our receipt of such capital (the “75% asset test”); and

Of the investments not meeting the requirements of the 75% asset test, the value of any single issuer’s debt and equity securities that we own (other than our equity interests in any entity classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, the stock or debt of a taxable REIT subsidiary or the stock or debt of a qualified REIT subsidiary or other disregarded entity subsidiary) may not exceed 5% of the value of our total assets (the “5% asset test”), and we may not own more than 10% of any single issuer’s outstanding voting securities (the “10% voting securities test”) or more than 10% of the value of any single issuer’s outstanding securities (the “10% value test”), subject to limited “safe harbor” exceptions.

No more than 25% (20% for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017) of the value of our total assets can be represented by securities of taxable REIT subsidiaries (the “25% TRS Test” or after December 31, 2017, the “20% TRS Test”).

For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2015, the aggregate value of all unsecured debt instruments of Publicly Offered REITs that we hold may not exceed 25% of the value of our total assets.”

We believe, but cannot assure you, that we have been and will continue to be in compliance with the asset tests described above. If we fail to satisfy one or more asset tests at the end of any quarter, we nevertheless may continue to qualify as a REIT if we satisfied all of the asset tests at the close of the preceding calendar quarter and the discrepancy between the value of our assets and the asset test requirements is due to changes in the market values and not caused in any part by our acquisition of non-qualifying assets.
Furthermore, if we fail to satisfy any of the asset tests at the end of any calendar quarter without curing that failure within 30 days after quarter end, we would fail to qualify as a REIT unless we qualified under certain relief provisions enacted as part of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. Under one relief provision, we would continue to qualify as a REIT if our failure to satisfy the 5% asset test, the 10% voting securities test or the 10% value test is due to our ownership of assets having a total value not exceeding the lesser of 1% of our assets at the end of the relevant quarter or $10 million and we disposed of those assets (or otherwise met such asset tests) within six months after the end of the quarter in which the failure was identified. If we fail to satisfy any of the asset tests for a particular quarter but do not qualify under the relief provision described in the preceding sentence, then we would be deemed to have satisfied the relevant asset test if: (i) following identification of the failure, we filed a schedule containing a description of each asset that caused the failure; (ii) the failure was due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect; (iii) we disposed of the non-qualifying asset (or otherwise met the relevant asset test) within six months after the end of the quarter in which the failure was identified; and (iv) we paid a penalty tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or the highest corporate tax rate multiplied by the net income generated by the non-qualifying asset during the period beginning on the first date of the failure and ending on the date we disposed of the asset (or otherwise cured the asset test failure). We cannot predict whether in all circumstances we would be entitled to the benefit of these relief provisions, and if we fail to satisfy any of the asset tests and do not qualify for the relief provisions, we will lose our REIT status, which would have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

16


Foreclosure Property

The foreclosure property rules permit us (by our election) to foreclose or repossess properties without being disqualified as a REIT as a result of receiving income that does not qualify under the gross income tests. However, in such a case, we would be subject to a corporate tax on the net non-qualifying income from “foreclosure property,” and the after-tax amount would increase the dividends we would be required to distribute to stockholders. See “-Annual Distribution Requirements”. The corporate tax imposed on non-qualifying income would not apply to income that qualifies as “good REIT income,” such as a lease of qualified healthcare property to a taxable REIT subsidiary, where the taxable REIT subsidiary engages an “eligible independent contractor” to manage and operate the property.
Foreclosure property treatment will end on the first day on which we enter into a lease of the applicable property that will give rise to income that does not constitute “good REIT income” under Section 856(c)(3) of the Code, but will not end if the lease will give rise only to good REIT income. Foreclosure property treatment also will end if any construction takes place on the property (other than completion of a building or other improvement that was more than 10% complete before default became imminent). Foreclosure property treatment (other than for qualified healthcare property) is available for an initial period of three years and may, in certain circumstances, be extended for an additional three years. Foreclosure property treatment for qualified healthcare property is available for an initial period of two years and may, in certain circumstances, be extended for an additional four years.
Taxable REIT Subsidiaries

A taxable REIT subsidiary, or “TRS,” is a corporation subject to tax as a regular C corporation. Generally, a TRS can own assets that cannot be owned by a REIT directly and can perform tenant services (excluding the direct or indirect operation or management of a lodging or healthcare facility) that would otherwise disqualify the REIT’s rental income under the gross income tests. Notwithstanding general restrictions on related party rent, a REIT can lease healthcare properties to a TRS if the TRS does not manage or operate the properties and instead engages an eligible independent contractor to manage them. We are permitted to own up to 100% of a TRS, subject to the 25% TRS Test (or 20% TRS Test, as applicable)but the Code imposes certain limits on the ability of the TRS to deduct interest payments made to us. In addition, we are subject to a 100% penalty tax on any excess payments received by us or any excess expenses deducted by the TRS if the economic arrangements between the REIT, the REIT’s tenants and the TRS are not comparable to similar arrangements among unrelated parties.
Annual Distribution Requirements

In order to be taxed as a REIT, we are required to distribute dividends (other than capital gain dividends) to our stockholders in an amount at least equal to the sum of (i) 90% of our “REIT taxable income” (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gain) and (ii) 90% of the net income (after tax), if any, from foreclosure property, minus the sum of certain items of non-cash income. These dividends must be paid in the taxable year to which they relate, but may be paid in the following taxable year if (i) they are declared in October, November or December, payable to stockholders of record on a specified date in one of those months and actually paid during January of such following year or (ii) they are declared before we timely file our tax return for such year and paid on or before the first regular dividend payment after such declaration, and we elect on our federal income tax return for the prior year to have a specified amount of the subsequent dividend treated as paid in the prior year. To the extent we do not distribute all of our net capital gain or at least 90%, but less than 100%, of our REIT taxable income, as adjusted, we will be subject to tax on the undistributed amount at regular capital gains and ordinary corporate tax rates, except to the extent of our net operating loss or capital loss carryforwards. If we pay any Built-in Gains Taxes, those taxes will be deductible in computing REIT taxable income. Moreover, if we fail to distribute during each calendar year (or, in the case of distributions with declaration and record dates falling in the last three months of the calendar year, by the end of January following such year) at least the sum of 85% of our REIT ordinary income for such year, 95% of our REIT capital gain net income for such year (other than long-term capital gain we elect to retain and treat as having been distributed to stockholders), and any undistributed taxable income from prior periods, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the excess of such required distribution over the amounts actually distributed.
We believe, but cannot assure you, that we have satisfied the annual distribution requirements for the year of our initial REIT election and each subsequent year through the year ended December 31, 2015. Although we intend to satisfy the annual distribution requirements to continue to qualify as a REIT for the year ending December 31, 2016 and thereafter, economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations could limit our ability to meet those requirements.
We have net operating loss carryforwards that we may use to reduce our annual distribution requirements. See “Note 13-Income Taxes” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

17


Failure to Continue to Qualify

If we fail to satisfy one or more requirements for REIT qualification, other than by violating a gross income or asset test for which relief is available under the circumstances described above, we would retain our REIT qualification if the failure is due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect and if we pay a penalty of $50,000 for each such failure. We cannot predict whether in all circumstances we would be entitled to the benefit of this relief provision.
If our election to be taxed as a REIT is revoked or terminated in any taxable year (e.g., due to a failure to meet the REIT qualification tests without qualifying for any applicable relief provisions), we would be subject to tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates (for all open tax years beginning with the year our REIT election is revoked or terminated), and we would not be required to make distributions to stockholders, nor would we be entitled to deduct any such distributions. All distributions to stockholders (to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits) would be taxable as ordinary income, except to the extent such dividends are eligible for the qualified dividends rate generally available to non-corporate holders, and, subject to certain limitations, corporate stockholders would be eligible for the dividends received deduction. In addition, we would be prohibited from re-electing REIT status for the four taxable years following the year during which we ceased to qualify as a REIT, unless certain relief provisions of the Code applied. We cannot predict whether we would be entitled to such relief.
New Partnership Audit Rules
The recently enacted Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 changes the rules applicable to U.S. federal income tax audits of partnerships. Under the new rules (which are generally effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017), among other changes and subject to certain exceptions, any audit adjustment to items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit of a partnership (and any partner’s distributive share thereof) is determined, and taxes, interest, or penalties attributable thereto are assessed and collected, at the partnership level. Although it is uncertain how these new rules will be implemented, it is possible that they could result in partnerships in which we directly or indirect invest being required to pay additional taxes, interest and penalties as a result of an audit adjustment, and we, as a direct or indirect partner of these partnerships, could be required to bear the economic burden of those taxes, interest, and penalties even though we, as a REIT, may not otherwise have been required to pay additional corporate-level taxes had we owned the assets of the partnership directly. The changes created by these new rules are sweeping and in many respects dependent on the promulgation of future regulations or other guidance by the U.S. Treasury. You should consult with your tax advisors with respect to these changes and their potential impact on your investment in our common stock.
Federal Income Taxation of U.S. Stockholders

As used in this discussion, the term “U.S. Stockholder” refers to any beneficial owner of our stock that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States, a corporation created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia, an estate the income of which must be included in gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes regardless of its source, or a trust if (i) a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of such trust and one or more U.S. persons have authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (ii) the trust has elected under applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations to retain its pre-August 20, 1996 classification as a U.S. person. If an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds our stock, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Partners in partnerships holding our stock should consult their tax advisors. This section assumes the U.S. Stockholder holds our stock as a capital asset (that is, for investment).
Provided we qualify as a REIT, distributions made to our taxable U.S. Stockholders out of current or accumulated earnings and profits (and not designated as capital gain dividends) generally will be taxable to such U.S. Stockholders as ordinary income and will not be eligible for the qualified dividends rate generally available to non-corporate holders or for the dividends received deduction generally available to corporations. Distributions that are designated as capital gain dividends will be taxed as a long-term capital gain (to the extent such distributions do not exceed our actual net capital gain for the taxable year) without regard to the period for which the stockholder has held our stock. The distributions we designate as capital gain dividends may not exceed our dividends paid for the taxable year, including dividends paid the following year that we treated as paid in the current year. Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits will not be taxable to a U.S. Stockholder to the extent they do not exceed the U.S. Stockholder’s adjusted basis of our stock (determined on a share-by-share basis), but rather will reduce the U.S. Stockholder’s adjusted basis of our stock. To the extent that distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits exceed the U.S. Stockholder’s adjusted basis of our stock, such distributions will be included in income as capital gains and taxable at a rate that will depend on the U.S. Stockholder’s holding period for our stock. Any distribution declared by us and payable to a stockholder of record on a specified date in October, November or

18


December of any year will be treated as both paid by us and received by the stockholder on December 31 of that year, provided that we actually pay the distribution during January of the following calendar year.
We may elect to treat all or a part of our undistributed net capital gain as if it had been distributed to our stockholders. If we so elect, our U.S. Stockholders would be required to include in their income as long-term capital gain their proportionate share of our undistributed net capital gain, as designated by us. Each U.S. Stockholder would be deemed to have paid its proportionate share of the income tax imposed on us with respect to such undistributed net capital gain, and this amount would be credited or refunded to the U.S. Stockholder. In addition, the U.S. Stockholder’s tax basis of our stock would be increased by its proportionate share of undistributed net capital gains included in its income, less its proportionate share of the income tax imposed on us with respect to such gains.
U.S. Stockholders may not include in their individual income tax returns any of our net operating losses or net capital losses. Instead, we may carry over those losses for potential offset against our future income, subject to certain limitations. Taxable distributions from us and gain from the disposition of our stock will not be treated as passive activity income, and, therefore, U.S. Stockholders generally will not be able to apply any “passive activity losses” (such as losses from certain types of limited partnerships in which the U.S. Stockholder is a limited partner) against such income. In addition, taxable distributions from us generally will be treated as investment income for purposes of the investment interest limitations.
We will notify stockholders after the close of our taxable year as to the portions of the distributions attributable to that year that constitute ordinary income, return of capital and capital gain. To the extent that a portion of the distribution is designated as a capital gain dividend, we will notify stockholders as to the portion that is a “20% rate gain distribution” and the portion that is an unrecaptured Section 1250 distribution. A 20% rate gain distribution is a capital gain distribution to U.S. Stockholders that are individuals, estates or trusts that is taxable at a maximum rate of 20%. An unrecaptured Section 1250 gain distribution is taxable to U.S. Stockholders that are individuals, estates or trusts at a maximum rate of 25%.
Taxation of U.S. Stockholders on the Disposition of Shares of Stock

In general, a U.S. Stockholder must treat any gain or loss realized upon a taxable disposition of our stock as long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Stockholder has held the stock for more than one year, and otherwise as short-term capital gain or loss. However, a U.S. Stockholder must treat any loss upon a sale or exchange of shares of our stock held for six months or less as a long-term capital loss to the extent of capital gain dividends and any other actual or deemed distributions from us which the U.S. Stockholder treats as long-term capital gain. All or a portion of any loss that a U.S. Stockholder realizes upon a taxable disposition of our stock may be disallowed if the U.S. Stockholder purchases other shares of our stock (or certain options to acquire our stock) within 30 days before or after the disposition.
Medicare Tax on Investment Income

Certain U.S. Stockholders who are individuals, estates or trusts and whose income exceeds certain thresholds are required to pay a 3.8% Medicare tax on dividends and certain other investment income, including capital gains from the sale or other disposition of our stock.
Treatment of Tax-Exempt Stockholders

Tax-exempt organizations, including qualified employee pension and profit sharing trusts and individual retirement accounts (collectively, “Exempt Organizations”), generally are exempt from U.S. federal income taxation but are subject to taxation on their unrelated business taxable income (“UBTI”). While many investments in real estate generate UBTI, a ruling published by the IRS states that dividend distributions by a REIT to an exempt employee pension trust do not constitute UBTI, provided that the shares of the REIT are not otherwise used in an unrelated trade or business of the exempt employee pension trust. Based on that ruling, and subject to the exceptions discussed below, amounts distributed by us to Exempt Organizations generally should not constitute UBTI. However, if an Exempt Organization finances its acquisition of our stock with debt, a portion of its income from us will constitute UBTI pursuant to the “debt-financed property” rules. Social clubs, voluntary employee benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit trusts and qualified group legal services plans that are exempt from taxation under paragraphs (7), (9), (17) and (20), respectively, of Section 501(c) of the Code are subject to different UBTI rules, which generally require them to characterize distributions from us as UBTI, and in certain circumstances, a pension trust that owns more than 10% of our stock is required to treat a percentage of the dividends from us as UBTI.

19


Special Tax Considerations for Non-U.S. Stockholders

As used herein, the term “Non-U.S. Stockholder” refers to any beneficial owner of our stock that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, a nonresident alien individual, foreign corporation, foreign estate or foreign trust, but does not include any foreign stockholder whose investment in our stock is “effectively connected” with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States. Such a foreign stockholder, in general, is subject to U.S. federal income tax with respect to its investment in our stock in the same manner as a U.S. Stockholder (subject to applicable alternative minimum tax and a special alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien individuals). In addition, a foreign corporation receiving income that is treated as effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business also may be subject to an additional 30% “branch profits tax” on its effectively connected earnings and profits (subject to adjustments) unless an applicable tax treaty provides a lower rate or an exemption. Certain certification requirements must be satisfied in order for effectively connected income to be exempt from withholding.
Distributions to Non-U.S. Stockholders that are not attributable to gain from sales or exchanges by us of U.S. real property interests and are not designated by us as capital gain dividends (or deemed distributions of retained capital gains) are treated as dividends of ordinary income to the extent that they are made out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits. Such distributions ordinarily are subject to a withholding tax equal to 30% of the gross amount of the distribution unless an applicable tax treaty reduces or eliminates that tax. Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits are not taxable to a Non-U.S. Stockholder to the extent that such distributions do not exceed the Non-U.S. Stockholder’s adjusted basis of our stock (determined on a share-by-share basis), but rather reduce the Non-U.S. Stockholder’s adjusted basis of our stock. To the extent that distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits exceed the Non-U.S. Stockholder’s adjusted basis of our stock, such distributions will give rise to tax liability if the Non-U.S. Stockholder would otherwise be subject to tax on any gain from the sale or disposition of our stock, as described below.
We expect to withhold U.S. tax at the rate of 30% on the gross amount of any dividends, other than dividends treated as attributable to gain from sales or exchanges of U.S. real property interests and capital gain dividends, paid to a Non-U.S. Stockholder, unless (i) a lower treaty rate applies and the required IRS Form W-8BEN or IRS Form W-8BEN-E evidencing eligibility for that reduced rate is filed with us or the appropriate withholding agent or (ii) the Non-U.S. Stockholder files an IRS Form W-8ECI or a successor form with us or the appropriate withholding agent properly claiming that the distributions are effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Stockholder’s conduct of a U.S. trade or business.
For any year in which we qualify as a REIT, distributions to a Non-U.S. Stockholder that owns more than 10% of our shares at any time during the one-year period ending on the date of distribution and that are attributable to gain from sales or exchanges by us of U.S. real property interests will be taxed to the Non-U.S. Stockholder under the provisions of the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 (“FIRPTA”) as if such gain were effectively connected with a U.S. business. Accordingly, a Non-U.S. Stockholder that owns more than 10% of our shares will be taxed at the normal capital gain rates applicable to a U.S. Stockholder (subject to any applicable alternative minimum tax and a special alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien individuals) and would be required to file a U.S. federal income tax return. Distributions subject to FIRPTA also may be subject to a branch profits tax equal to 30% of its effectively connected earnings and profits (subject to adjustments) if the recipient is a corporate Non-U.S. Stockholder not entitled to treaty relief or exemption. Under FIRPTA, we are required to withhold 35% (which is higher than the maximum rate on long-term capital gains of non-corporate persons) of any distribution to a Non-U.S. Stockholder that owns more than 10% of our shares which is or could be designated as a capital gain dividend attributable to U.S. real property interests. Moreover, if we designate previously made distributions as capital gain dividends attributable to U.S. real property interests, subsequent distributions (up to the amount of such prior distributions) will be treated as capital gain dividends subject to FIRPTA withholding. This amount is creditable against the Non-U.S. Stockholder’s FIRPTA tax liability.
Distributions by us to a “qualified foreign pension fund,” within the meaning of Section 897(l) of the Code (“Qualified Foreign Pension Fund”), or any entity all of the interests of which are held by a Qualified Foreign Pension Fund, is exempt from FIRPTA, but may nonetheless be subject to U.S. federal dividend withholding tax unless an applicable tax treaty or Section 892 of the Code provides an exemption from such dividend withholding tax. Non-U.S. Stockholders who are Qualified Foreign Pension Funds should consult their tax advisors regarding the application of these rules.
If a Non-U.S. Stockholder does not own more than 10% of our shares at any time during the one-year period ending on the date of a distribution, any capital gain distributions, to the extent attributable to sales or exchanges by us of U.S. real property interests, will not be considered to be effectively connected with a U.S. business, and the Non-U.S. Stockholder would not be required to file a U.S. federal income tax return solely as a result of receiving such a distribution. In that case, the distribution will be treated as an ordinary dividend to that Non-U.S. Stockholder and taxed as an ordinary dividend that is not a capital gain distribution (and subject to withholding), as described above. In addition, the branch profits tax will not apply to the

20


distribution. Any capital gain distribution, to the extent not attributable to sales or exchanges by us of U.S. real property interests, generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxation (regardless of the amount of our shares owned by a Non-U.S. Stockholder).
For so long as our stock continues to be regularly traded on an established securities market, the sale of such stock by any Non-U.S. Stockholder who is not a Ten Percent Non-U.S. Stockholder (as defined below) generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax (unless the Non-U.S. Stockholder is a nonresident alien individual who was present in the United States for more than 182 days during the taxable year of the sale and certain other conditions apply, in which case such gain (net of certain sources within the U.S., if any) will be subject to a 30% tax on a gross basis). A “Ten Percent Non-U.S. Stockholder” is a Non-U.S. Stockholder who, at some time during the five-year period preceding such sale or disposition, beneficially owned (including under certain attribution rules) more than 10% of the total fair market value of our stock (as outstanding from time to time).
In general, the sale or other taxable disposition of our stock by a Ten Percent Non-U.S. Stockholder also will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax if we are a “domestically controlled REIT.” A REIT is a “domestically controlled REIT” if, at all times during the five-year period preceding the disposition in question, less than 50% in value of its shares is held directly or indirectly by Non-U.S. Stockholders. For purposes of determining whether a REIT is a domestically controlled qualified REIT, certain special rules apply including the rule that a person who at all applicable times holds less than 5 percent of a class of stock that is “regularly traded” is treated as a U.S. person unless the REIT has actual knowledge that such person is not a U.S. person. Because our common stock is publicly traded, we believe, but cannot assure you, that we currently qualify as a domestically controlled REIT, nor can we assure you that we will so qualify at any time in the future. If we do not constitute a domestically controlled REIT, a Ten Percent Non-U.S. Stockholder generally will be taxed in the same manner as a U.S. Stockholder with respect to gain on the sale of our stock (subject to applicable alternative minimum tax and a special alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien individuals). The sale or other taxable disposition of our stock by a Qualified Foreign Pension Fund, or any entity all of the interests of which are held by a Qualified Foreign Pension Fund, is exempt from U.S. tax irrespective of the level of its shareholding in us and of whether we are a domestically controlled REIT.
Special rules apply to certain collective investment funds that are “qualified shareholders” as defined in Section 897(k)(3) of the Code of a REIT.  Such investors, which include publicly traded vehicles that meet certain requirements, should consult with their own tax advisors prior to making an investment in our shares. 
A 30% withholding tax will currently be imposed on dividends paid on our stock and will be imposed on gross proceeds from a sale or redemption of our stock paid after December 31, 2018 to (i) foreign financial institutions including non-U.S. investment funds, unless they agree to collect and disclose to the IRS information regarding their direct and indirect U.S. account holders and (ii) certain other foreign entities, unless they certify certain information regarding their direct and indirect U.S. owners.  To avoid withholding, foreign financial institutions will need to (i) enter into agreements with the IRS that state that they will provide the IRS information, including the names, addresses and taxpayer identification numbers of direct and indirect U.S. account holders, comply with due diligence procedures with respect to the identification of U.S. accounts, report to the IRS certain information with respect to U.S. accounts maintained, agree to withhold tax on certain payments made to non-compliant foreign financial institutions or to account holders who fail to provide the required information, and determine certain other information as to their account holders, or (ii) in the event that an applicable intergovernmental agreement and implementing legislation are adopted, provide local revenue authorities with similar account holder information or otherwise comply with the terms of the intergovernmental agreement and implementing legislation. Other foreign entities will need to either provide the name, address, and taxpayer identification number of each substantial U.S. owner or certifications of no substantial U.S. ownership unless certain exceptions apply or agree to provide certain information to other revenue authorities for transmittal to the IRS.
Information Reporting Requirements and Backup Withholding

Information returns may be filed with the IRS and backup withholding (at a rate of 28%) may be collected in connection with distributions paid or required to be treated as paid during each calendar year and payments of the proceeds of a sale or other disposition of our stock by a stockholder, unless such stockholder is a corporation, non-U.S. person or comes within certain other exempt categories and, when required, demonstrates this fact or provides a taxpayer identification number, certifies as to no loss of exemption from backup withholding and otherwise complies with the applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules. A stockholder who does not provide us with its correct taxpayer identification number also may be subject to penalties imposed by the IRS.

21


Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, the U.S. federal income tax liability of persons subject to backup withholding will be offset by the amount of tax withheld. If backup withholding results in an overpayment of U.S. federal income taxes, a refund or credit may be obtained from the IRS, provided the required information is furnished timely thereto.
As a general matter, backup withholding and information reporting will not apply to a payment of the proceeds of a sale of our stock by or through a foreign office of a foreign broker. Information reporting (but not backup withholding) will apply, however, to a payment of the proceeds of a sale of our stock by a foreign office of a broker that is a U.S. person, a foreign partnership that engaged during certain periods in the conduct of a trade or business in the United States or more than 50% of whose capital or profit interests are owned during certain periods by U.S. persons, any foreign person that derives 50% or more of its gross income for certain periods from the conduct of a trade or business in the United States, or a “controlled foreign corporation” for U.S. tax purposes, unless the broker has documentary evidence in its records that the holder is a Non-U.S. Stockholder and certain other conditions are satisfied, or the stockholder otherwise establishes an exemption. Payment to or through a U.S. office of a broker of the proceeds of a sale of our stock is subject to both backup withholding and information reporting unless the stockholder certifies under penalties of perjury that the stockholder is a Non-U.S. Stockholder or otherwise establishes an exemption. A stockholder may obtain a refund of any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules in excess of its U.S. federal income tax liability by timely filing the appropriate claim for a refund with the IRS.
Other Tax Consequences

State and Local Taxes

We and our stockholders may be subject to taxation by various states and localities, including those in which we or a stockholder transact business, own property or reside. State and local tax treatment may differ from the U.S. federal income tax treatment described above. Consequently, stockholders should consult their own tax advisers regarding the effect of state and local tax laws, in addition to federal, foreign and other tax laws, in connection with an investment in our stock.
Possible Legislative or Other Actions Affecting Tax Consequences

You should recognize that future legislative, judicial and administrative actions or decisions, which may be retroactive in effect, could adversely affect our federal income tax treatment or the tax consequences of an investment in shares of our stock. The rules dealing with U.S. federal income taxation are continually under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department, resulting in statutory changes as well as promulgation of new, or revisions to existing, regulations and revised interpretations of established concepts. We cannot predict the likelihood of passage of any new tax legislation or other provisions, either directly or indirectly, affecting us or our stockholders or the value of an investment in our stock. Changes to the tax laws, such as the Protecting Americans From Tax Hikes Act of 2015 enacted on December 18, 2015 or the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 enacted on November 2, 2015, or interpretations thereof by the IRS and the Treasury, with or without retroactive application, could materially and adversely affect us or our stockholders.
ITEM 1A.    Risk Factors
This section discusses the most significant factors that affect our business, operations and financial condition. It does not describe all risks and uncertainties applicable to us, our industry or ownership of our securities. If any of the following risks, or any other risks and uncertainties that are not addressed below or that we have not yet identified, actually occur, we could be materially adversely affected and the value of our securities could decline.
We have grouped these risk factors into three general categories:
Risks arising from our business;
Risks arising from our capital structure; and
Risks arising from our status as a REIT.
Risks Arising from Our Business
The properties managed by Atria and Sunrise account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; adverse developments in Atria’s or Sunrise’s business and affairs or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
As of December 31, 2015, Atria and Sunrise, collectively, managed 268 of our seniors housing communities pursuant to long-term management agreements. These properties represent a substantial portion of our portfolio, based on their gross book

22


value, and account for a significant portion of our revenues and NOI. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, we rely on Atria’s and Sunrise’s personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations efficiently and effectively. We also rely on Atria and Sunrise to set appropriate resident fees, to provide accurate property-level financial results for our properties in a timely manner and to otherwise operate our seniors housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. For example, we depend on Atria’s and Sunrise’s ability to attract and retain skilled management personnel who are responsible for the day-to-day operations of our seniors housing communities. A shortage of nurses or other trained personnel or general inflationary pressures may force Atria or Sunrise to enhance its pay and benefits package to compete effectively for such personnel, but it may not be able to offset these added costs by increasing the rates charged to residents. Any increase in labor costs and other property operating expenses, any failure by Atria or Sunrise to attract and retain qualified personnel, or significant changes in Atria’s or Sunrise’s senior management or equity ownership could adversely affect the income we receive from our seniors housing communities and have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Because Atria and Sunrise manage our properties in exchange for the receipt of a management fee from us, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants. However, any adverse developments in Atria’s or Sunrise’s business and affairs or financial condition could impair its ability to manage our properties efficiently and effectively and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. If Atria or Sunrise experiences any significant financial, legal, accounting or regulatory difficulties due to a weak economy or otherwise, such difficulties could result in, among other adverse events, acceleration of its indebtedness, impairment of its continued access to capital, the enforcement of default remedies by its counterparties, or the commencement of insolvency proceedings by or against it under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, any one or a combination of which indirectly could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Our leases with Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred and Ardent account for a significant portion of our triple-net leased properties segment revenues and operating income; any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred or Ardent to satisfy its obligations under our agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
The properties we lease to Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred and Ardent account for a significant portion of our triple-net leased properties segment revenues and NOI, and because our leases with Brookdale Senior Living and Ardent and the Kindred Master Leases are triple-net leases, we depend on Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred and Ardent to pay all insurance, taxes, utilities and maintenance and repair expenses in connection with the leased properties. We cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred and Ardent will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable them to satisfy their respective obligations to us, and any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred or Ardent to do so could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. In addition, any failure by Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred or Ardent to effectively conduct its operations or to maintain and improve our properties could adversely affect its business reputation and its ability to attract and retain patients and residents in our properties, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred and Ardent have agreed to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless from and against various claims, litigation and liabilities arising in connection with their respective businesses, and we cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred and Ardent will have sufficient assets, income, access to financing and insurance coverage to enable them to satisfy their respective indemnification obligations.
We face potential adverse consequences of bankruptcy or insolvency by our tenants, operators, borrowers, managers and other obligors.
We are exposed to the risk that our tenants, operators, borrowers, managers or other obligors may become bankrupt or insolvent. Although our lease, loan and management agreements give us the right to exercise certain remedies in the event of default on the obligations owing to us or upon the occurrence of certain insolvency events, federal laws afford certain rights to a party that has filed for bankruptcy or reorganization. For example, a debtor-lessee may reject our lease in a bankruptcy proceeding, in which case our claim against the debtor-lessee for unpaid and future rents would be limited by the statutory cap of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This statutory cap could be substantially less than the remaining rent actually owed under the lease, and any claim we have for unpaid rent might not be paid in full. In addition, a debtor-lessee may assert in a bankruptcy proceeding that our lease should be re-characterized as a financing agreement, in which case our rights and remedies as a lender, compared to a landlord, generally would be more limited. If a debtor-manager seeks bankruptcy protection, the automatic stay provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code would preclude us from enforcing our remedies against the manager unless relief is first obtained from the court having jurisdiction over the bankruptcy case. In any of these events, we also may be required to fund certain expenses and obligations (e.g., real estate taxes, debt costs and maintenance expenses) to preserve the value of our properties, avoid the imposition of liens on our properties or transition our properties to a new tenant, operator or manager.

23


We have rights to terminate our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise in whole or with respect to specific properties under certain circumstances, and we may be unable to replace Atria or Sunrise if our management agreements are terminated or not renewed.
We are parties to long-term management agreements pursuant to which Atria and Sunrise, collectively, provided comprehensive property management and accounting services with respect to 268 of our seniors housing communities as of December 31, 2015. Most of our management agreements with Atria have terms expiring either July 31, 2024 or December 31, 2027, with successive automatic ten-year renewal periods, and our management agreements with Sunrise have terms ranging from 25 to 30 years (which commenced as early as 2004 and as recently as 2012). Our ability to terminate these long-term management agreements is limited to specific circumstances set forth in the agreements and may relate to all properties or a specific property or group of properties.
We may terminate any of our Atria management agreements upon the occurrence of an event of default by Atria in the performance of a material covenant or term thereof (including, in certain circumstances, the revocation of any license or certificate necessary for operation), subject in most cases to Atria’s right to cure such default, or upon the occurrence of certain insolvency events relating to Atria. In addition, we may terminate our management agreements with Atria based on the failure to achieve certain NOI targets or upon the payment of a fee.
Similarly, we may terminate any of our Sunrise management agreements upon the occurrence of an event of default by Sunrise in the performance of a material covenant or term thereof (including, in certain circumstances, the revocation of any license or certificate necessary for operation), subject in most cases to Sunrise’s right to cure such default, or upon the occurrence of certain insolvency events relating to Sunrise. We also may terminate most of our management agreements with Sunrise based on the failure to achieve certain NOI targets or to comply with certain expense control covenants, subject to certain rights of Sunrise to make cure payments to us, and upon the occurrence of certain other events or the existence of certain other conditions.
We continually monitor and assess our contractual rights and remedies under our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise. When determining whether to pursue any existing or future rights or remedies under those agreements, including termination rights, we consider numerous factors, including legal, contractual, regulatory, business and other relevant considerations. In the event that we exercise our rights to terminate the Atria or Sunrise management agreements for any reason or such agreements are not renewed upon expiration of their terms, we would attempt to reposition the affected properties with another manager. Although we believe that many qualified national and regional seniors housing operators would be interested in managing our seniors housing communities, we cannot assure you that we would be able to locate another suitable manager or, if we are successful in locating such a manager, that it would manage the properties effectively. Moreover, the transition to a replacement manager would require approval by the applicable regulatory authorities and, in most cases, the mortgage lenders for the properties, and we cannot assure you that such approvals would be granted on a timely basis, if at all. Any inability to replace, or a lengthy delay in replacing, Atria or Sunrise as the manager of our seniors housing communities following termination or non-renewal of the applicable management agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
If we must replace any of our tenants or operators, we might be unable to reposition the properties on as favorable terms, or at all, and we could be subject to delays, limitations and expenses, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
We cannot predict whether our tenants will renew existing leases beyond their current term. If our leases with Brookdale Senior Living or Ardent, the Kindred Master Leases or any of our other triple-net leases are not renewed, we would attempt to reposition those properties with another tenant or operator. In case of non-renewal, we generally have one year prior to expiration of the lease term to arrange for repositioning of the properties and our tenants are required to continue to perform all of their obligations (including the payment of all rental amounts) for the non-renewed assets until such expiration. However, following expiration of a lease term or if we exercise our right to replace a tenant or operator in default, rental payments on the related properties could decline or cease altogether while we reposition the properties with a suitable replacement tenant or operator. We also might not be successful in identifying suitable replacements or entering into leases or other arrangements with new tenants or operators on a timely basis or on terms as favorable to us as our current leases, if at all, and we may be required to fund certain expenses and obligations (e.g., real estate taxes, debt costs and maintenance expenses) to preserve the value of, and avoid the imposition of liens on, our properties while they are being repositioned. In addition, we may incur certain obligations and liabilities, including obligations to indemnify the replacement tenant or operator, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
In the event of non-renewal or a tenant default, our ability to reposition our properties with a suitable replacement tenant or operator could be significantly delayed or limited by state licensing, receivership, CON or other laws, as well as by the Medicare and Medicaid change-of-ownership rules, and we could incur substantial additional expenses in connection with any licensing, receivership or change-of-ownership proceedings. Our ability to locate and attract suitable replacement tenants also

24


could be impaired by the specialized healthcare uses or contractual restrictions on use of the properties, and we may be forced to spend substantial amounts to adapt the properties to other uses. Any such delays, limitations and expenses could adversely impact our ability to collect rent, obtain possession of leased properties or otherwise exercise remedies for tenant default and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Moreover, in connection with certain of our properties, we have entered into intercreditor agreements with the tenants’ lenders or tri-party agreements with our lenders. Our ability to exercise remedies under the applicable leases or management agreements or to reposition the applicable properties may be significantly delayed or limited by the terms of the intercreditor agreement or tri-party agreement. Any such delay or limit on our rights and remedies could adversely affect our ability to mitigate our losses and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Merger and acquisition activity or consolidation in the seniors housing and healthcare industries resulting in a change of control of, or a competitor’s investment in, one or more of our tenants, operators or managers could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
The seniors housing and healthcare industries have recently experienced increased consolidation, including among owners of real estate and care providers. We compete with other healthcare REITs, healthcare providers, healthcare lenders, real estate partnerships, banks, insurance companies, private equity firms and other investors that pursue a variety of investments, which may include investments in our tenants, operators or managers. A competitor’s investment in one of our tenants, operators or managers could enable our competitor to influence that tenant’s, operator’s or manager’s business and strategy in a manner that impairs our relationship with the tenant, operator or manager or is otherwise adverse to our interests. Depending on our contractual agreements and the specific facts and circumstances, we may have the right to consent to, or otherwise exercise rights and remedies, including termination rights, on account of, a competitor’s investment in, a change of control of, or other transactions impacting a tenant, operator or manager. In deciding whether to exercise our rights and remedies, including termination rights, we assess numerous factors, including legal, contractual, regulatory, business and other relevant considerations. In addition, in connection with any change of control of a tenant, operator or manager, the tenant’s, operator’s or manager’s management team may change, which could lead to a change in the tenant’s, operator’s or manager’s strategy or adversely affect the business of the tenant, operator or manager, either of which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Market conditions, including, but not limited to, interest rates and credit spreads, the availability of credit and the actual and perceived state of the real estate markets and public capital markets generally could negatively impact our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
 The markets in which we operate are affected by a number of factors that are largely beyond our control but may nevertheless have a significant negative impact on us. These factors include, but are not limited to:
Interest rates and credit spreads; 
The availability of credit, including the price, terms and conditions under which it can be obtained; and
The actual and perceived state of the real estate market, the market for dividend-paying stocks and public capital markets in general.
In addition, increased inflation may have a pronounced negative impact on the interest expense we pay in connection with our outstanding indebtedness and our general and administrative expenses, as these costs could increase at a rate higher than our rents.
        Deflation may result in a decline in general price levels, often caused by a decrease in the supply of money or credit. The predominant effects of deflation are high unemployment, credit contraction and weakened consumer demand. Restricted lending practices may impact our ability to obtain financing for our properties, which could adversely impact our growth and profitability.
Our ongoing strategy depends, in part, upon future investments in and acquisitions of, or our development or redevelopment of, seniors housing and healthcare assets, and we may not be successful in identifying and consummating these transactions.
An important part of our business strategy is to continue to expand and diversify our portfolio through accretive acquisition, investment, development and redevelopment opportunities in domestic and international seniors housing and healthcare properties. Our execution of this strategy by successfully identifying, securing and consummating beneficial transactions is made more challenging by increased competition and can be affected by many factors, including our relationships with current and prospective clients, our ability to obtain debt and equity capital at costs comparable to or better than our competitors and lower than the yield we earn on our acquisitions or investments, and our ability to negotiate favorable terms with property owners seeking to sell and other contractual counterparties. Our competitors for these opportunities

25


include other healthcare REITs, real estate partnerships, healthcare providers, healthcare lenders and other investors, including developers, banks, insurance companies, pension funds, government-sponsored entities and private equity firms, some of whom may have greater financial resources and lower costs of capital than we do. See “Business—Competition” included in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If we are unsuccessful at identifying and capitalizing on investment, acquisition, development and redevelopment opportunities, our growth and profitability may be adversely affected.
Investments in and acquisitions of seniors housing and healthcare properties entail risks associated with real estate investments generally, including risks that the investment will not achieve expected returns, that the cost estimates for necessary property improvements will prove inaccurate or that the tenant, operator or manager will fail to meet performance expectations. Investments outside the United States raise legal, economic and market risks associated with doing business in foreign countries, such as currency exchange fluctuations, costly regulatory requirements and foreign tax risks. Domestic and international real estate development and redevelopment projects present additional risks, including construction delays or cost overruns that increase expenses, the inability to obtain required zoning, occupancy and other governmental approvals and permits on a timely basis, and the incurrence of significant costs prior to completion of the project. Furthermore, healthcare properties are often highly customized and the development or redevelopment of such properties may require costly tenant-specific improvements. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will achieve the economic benefit we expect from acquisition, investment, development and redevelopment opportunities.
Our significant acquisition and investment activity presents certain risks to our business and operations.
We have made and expect to continue to make significant acquisitions and investments as part of our overall business strategy. Our significant acquisition and investment activity presents certain risks to our business and operations, including, among other things, that:
We may be unable to successfully integrate the operations, personnel or systems of acquired companies, maintain consistent standards, controls, policies and procedures, or realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions and other investments within the anticipated time frame or at all;
We may be unable to effectively monitor and manage our expanded portfolio of properties, retain key employees or attract highly qualified new employees;
Projections of estimated future revenues, costs savings or operating metrics that we develop during the due diligence and integration planning process might be inaccurate;
Our leverage could increase or our per share financial results could decline if we incur additional debt or issue equity securities to finance acquisitions and investments;
Acquisitions and other new investments could divert management’s attention from our existing assets;
The value of acquired assets or the market price of our common stock may decline; and
We may be unable to continue paying dividends at the current rate.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to integrate acquisitions and investments without encountering difficulties or that any such difficulties will not have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
If the liabilities we assume in connection with acquisitions, including indemnification obligations in favor of third parties, are greater than expected, or if there are unknown liabilities, our business could be materially and adversely affected.
We may assume or incur liabilities in connection with our acquisitions, including, in some cases, contingent liabilities. As we integrate these acquisitions, we may learn additional information about the sellers, the properties, their operations and their liabilities that adversely affects us, such as:
Liabilities relating to the clean-up or remediation of undisclosed environmental conditions;
Unasserted claims of vendors or other persons dealing with the sellers;
Liabilities, claims and litigation, including indemnification obligations, whether or not incurred in the ordinary course of business, relating to periods prior to or following our acquisition;
Claims for indemnification by general partners, directors, officers and others indemnified by the sellers; and
Liabilities for taxes relating to periods prior to our acquisition.
As a result, we cannot assure you that our past or future acquisitions will be successful or will not, in fact, harm our business. Among other things, if the liabilities we assume in connection with acquisitions are greater than expected, or if we

26


discover obligations relating to the acquired properties or businesses of which we were not aware at the time of acquisition, our business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
In addition, we have now, and may have in the future, certain surviving indemnification obligations in favor of third parties under the terms of acquisition agreements to which we are a party.  Most of these indemnification obligations will be capped as to amount and survival period, and we do not believe that these obligations will be material in the aggregate.  However, there can be no assurances as to the ultimate amount of such obligations or whether such obligations will have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Our future results will suffer if we do not effectively manage the expansion of our hospital portfolio and operations following the acquisition of AHS.
As a result of our acquisition of AHS, we entered into the general acute care hospital sector. Part of our long-term business strategy involves expanding our hospital portfolio through additional acquisitions. Both the asset management of our existing general acute care hospital portfolio and such additional acquisitions may involve complex challenges. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to manage our expansion opportunities, integrate new investments into our existing business in an efficient and timely manner, successfully monitor the operations, costs, regulatory compliance and service quality of our operators and leverage our relationships with Ardent and other operators of hospitals. It is possible that our expansion or acquisition opportunities within the general acute care hospital sector will not be successful, which could adversely impact our growth and future results.
Our investments are concentrated in seniors housing and healthcare real estate, making us more vulnerable economically to adverse changes in the real estate market and the seniors housing and healthcare industries than if our investments were diversified.
We invest primarily in seniors housing and healthcare properties and are constrained by the terms of our existing indebtedness from making investments outside those industries. This investment focus exposes us to greater economic risk than if our portfolio were to include real estate assets in other industries or assets unrelated to real estate.
The healthcare industry is highly regulated, and changes in government regulation and reimbursement can have material adverse consequences on its participants, some of which may be unintended. The healthcare industry is also highly competitive, and our operators and managers may encounter increased competition for residents and patients, including with respect to the scope and quality of care and services provided, reputation and financial condition, physical appearance of the properties, price and location. If our tenants, operators and managers are unable to successfully compete with other operators and managers by maintaining profitable occupancy and rate levels, their ability to meet their respective obligations to us may be materially adversely affected. We cannot assure you that future changes in government regulation will not adversely affect the healthcare industry, including our seniors housing and healthcare operations, tenants and operators, nor can we be certain that our tenants, operators and managers will achieve and maintain occupancy and rate levels that will enable them to satisfy their obligations to us. Any adverse changes in the regulation of the healthcare industry or the competitiveness of our tenants, operators and managers could have a more pronounced effect on us than if we had investments outside the seniors housing and healthcare industries.
Real estate investments are relatively illiquid, and our ability to quickly sell or exchange our properties in response to changes in economic or other conditions is limited. In the event we market any of our properties for sale, the value of those properties and our ability to sell at prices or on terms acceptable to us could be adversely affected by a downturn in the real estate industry or any economic weakness in the seniors housing and healthcare industries. In addition, transfers of healthcare properties may be subject to regulatory approvals that are not required for transfers of other types of commercial properties. We cannot assure you that we will recognize the full value of any property that we sell for liquidity or other reasons, and the inability to respond quickly to changes in the performance of our investments could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our operating assets expose us to various operational risks, liabilities and claims that could adversely affect our ability to generate revenues or increase our costs and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Our senior living operating assets and MOBs expose us to various operational risks, liabilities and claims that could increase our costs or adversely affect our ability to generate revenues, thereby reducing our profitability. These operational risks include fluctuations in occupancy levels, the inability to achieve economic resident fees (including anticipated increases in those fees), increases in the cost of food, materials, energy, labor (as a result of unionization or otherwise) or other services, rent control regulations, national and regional economic conditions, the imposition of new or increased taxes, capital expenditure requirements, professional and general liability claims, and the availability and cost of professional and general liability

27


insurance. Any one or a combination of these factors could result in operating deficiencies in our senior living operations or MOB operations reportable business segments, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Our ownership of properties outside the United States exposes us to different risks than those associated with our domestic properties.
Our current or future ownership of properties outside the United States subjects us to risks that may be different or greater than those we face with our domestic properties. These risks include, but are not limited to:
Challenges with respect to repatriation of foreign earnings and cash;
Foreign ownership restrictions with respect to operations in countries in which we own properties;
Regional or country-specific business cycles and economic instability;
Challenges of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and regulations, including those relating to real estate, corporate governance, operations, taxes, employment and legal proceedings;
Differences in lending practices and the willingness of domestic or foreign lenders to provide financing; and
Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations in the United States that affect foreign operations, including, but not limited to, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
Increased construction and development in the markets in which our seniors housing communities and MOBs are located could adversely affect our future occupancy rates, operating margins and profitability.
Limited barriers to entry in the seniors housing and MOB industries could lead to the development of new seniors housing communities or MOBs that outpaces demand. In particular, data published by the National Investment Center for Seniors Housing & Care has indicated that seniors housing construction starts have been increasing and deliveries on seniors housing communities will accelerate in 2016, especially in certain geographic markets. If development outpaces demand for those assets in the markets in which our properties are located, those markets may become saturated and we could experience decreased occupancy, reduced operating margins and lower profitability, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
We have now, and may have in the future, exposure to contingent rent escalators, which could hinder our growth and profitability.
We derive a significant portion of our revenues from leasing properties pursuant to long-term triple-net leases that generally provide for fixed rental rates, subject to annual escalations. In certain cases, the annual escalations are contingent upon the achievement of specified revenue parameters or based on changes in CPI, with caps and floors. If, as a result of weak economic conditions or other factors, the properties subject to these leases do not generate sufficient revenue to achieve the specified rent escalation parameters or CPI does not increase, our growth and profitability may be hindered. If strong economic conditions result in significant increases in CPI, but the escalations under our leases are capped, our growth and profitability also may be limited.
We own certain properties subject to ground lease, air rights or other restrictive agreements that limit our uses of the properties, restrict our ability to sell or otherwise transfer the properties and expose us to loss of the properties if such agreements are breached by us or terminated.
Our investments in MOBs and other properties may be made through leasehold interests in the land on which the buildings are located, leases of air rights for the space above the land on which the buildings are located, or other similar restrictive arrangements. Many of these ground lease, air rights and other restrictive agreements impose significant limitations on our uses of the subject properties, restrict our ability to sell or otherwise transfer our interests in the properties or restrict the leasing of the properties. These restrictions may limit our ability to timely sell or exchange the properties, impair the properties’ value or negatively impact our ability to find suitable tenants for the properties. In addition, we could lose our interests in the subject properties if the ground lease, air rights or other restrictive agreements are breached by us or terminated.
We may be unable to successfully foreclose on the collateral securing our loans and other investments, and even if we are successful in our foreclosure efforts, we may be unable to successfully sell any acquired equity interests or reposition any acquired properties, which could adversely affect our ability to recover our investments.
If a borrower defaults under mortgage or other secured loans for which we are the lender, we may attempt to foreclose on the collateral securing those loans, including by acquiring any pledged equity interests or acquiring title to the subject properties, to protect our investment. In response, the defaulting borrower may contest our enforcement of foreclosure or other available remedies, seek bankruptcy protection against our exercise of enforcement or other available remedies, or bring claims against us for lender liability. If a defaulting borrower seeks bankruptcy protection, the automatic stay provisions of the U.S.

28


Bankruptcy Code would preclude us from enforcing foreclosure or other available remedies against the borrower unless relief is first obtained from the court with jurisdiction over the bankruptcy case. In addition, we may be subject to intercreditor or tri-party agreements that delay, impact, govern or limit our ability to foreclose on a lien securing a loan or otherwise delay or limit our pursuit of our rights and remedies. Any such delay or limit on our ability to pursue our rights or remedies could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Even if we successfully foreclose on the collateral securing our mortgage loans and other investments, costs related to enforcement of our remedies, high loan-to-value ratios or declines in the value of the collateral could prevent us from realizing the full amount of our secured loans, and we could be required to record a valuation allowance for such losses. Moreover, the collateral may include equity interests that we are unable to sell due to securities law restrictions or otherwise, or properties that we are unable to reposition with new tenants or operators on a timely basis, if at all, or without making improvements or repairs. Any delay or costs incurred in selling or repositioning acquired collateral could adversely affect our ability to recover our investments.
Some of our loan investments are subordinated to loans held by third parties.
Our mezzanine loan investments are subordinated to senior secured loans held by other investors that encumber the same real estate. If a senior secured loan is foreclosed, that foreclosure would extinguish our rights in the collateral for our mezzanine loan. In order to protect our economic interest in that collateral, we would need to be prepared, on an expedited basis, to advance funds to the senior lenders in order to cure defaults under the senior secured loans and prevent such a foreclosure. If a senior secured loan has matured or has been accelerated, then in order to protect our economic interest in the collateral, we would need to be prepared, on an expedited basis, to purchase or pay off that senior secured loan, which could require an infusion of fresh capital as large or larger than our initial investment. Our ability to sell or syndicate a mezzanine loan could be limited by transfer restrictions in the intercreditor agreement with the senior secured lenders. Our ability to negotiate modifications to the mezzanine loan documents with our borrowers could be limited by restrictions on modifications in the intercreditor agreement. Since mezzanine loans are typically secured by pledges of equity rather than direct liens on real estate, our mezzanine loan investments are more vulnerable than our mortgage loan investments to losses caused by competing creditor claims, unauthorized transfers, or bankruptcies.
Our tenants, operators and managers may be adversely affected by healthcare regulation and enforcement.
Regulation of the long-term healthcare industry generally has intensified over time both in the number and type of regulations and in the efforts to enforce those regulations. This is particularly true for large for-profit, multi-facility providers like Atria, Sunrise, Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred and Ardent. Federal, state and local laws and regulations affecting the healthcare industry include those relating to, among other things, licensure, conduct of operations, ownership of facilities, addition of facilities and equipment, allowable costs, services, prices for services, qualified beneficiaries, quality of care, patient rights, fraudulent or abusive behavior, and financial and other arrangements that may be entered into by healthcare providers. In addition, changes in enforcement policies by federal and state governments have resulted in an increase in the number of inspections, citations of regulatory deficiencies and other regulatory sanctions, including terminations from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, bars on Medicare and Medicaid payments for new admissions, civil monetary penalties and even criminal penalties. See “Governmental Regulation—Healthcare Regulation” included in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We are unable to predict the scope of future federal, state and local regulations and legislation, including the Medicare and Medicaid statutes and regulations, or the intensity of enforcement efforts with respect to such regulations and legislation, and any changes in the regulatory framework could have a material adverse effect on our tenants, operators and managers, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
If our tenants, operators and managers fail to comply with the extensive laws, regulations and other requirements applicable to their businesses and the operation of our properties, they could become ineligible to receive reimbursement from governmental and private third-party payor programs, face bans on admissions of new patients or residents, suffer civil or criminal penalties or be required to make significant changes to their operations. Our tenants, operators and managers also could face increased costs related to healthcare regulation, such as the Affordable Care Act, or be forced to expend considerable resources in responding to an investigation or other enforcement action under applicable laws or regulations. In such event, the results of operations and financial condition of our tenants, operators and managers and the results of operations of our properties operated or managed by those entities could be adversely affected, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

29


Changes in the reimbursement rates or methods of payment from third-party payors, including insurance companies and the Medicare and Medicaid programs, could have a material adverse effect on certain of our tenants and operators and on us.
Certain of our tenants and operators rely on reimbursement from third-party payors, including the Medicare (both traditional Medicare and "managed" Medicare/Medicare Advantage) and Medicaid programs, for substantially all of their revenues. Federal and state legislators and regulators have adopted or proposed various cost-containment measures that would limit payments to healthcare providers, and budget crises and financial shortfalls have caused states to implement or consider Medicaid rate freezes or cuts. See “Governmental Regulation—Healthcare Regulation” included in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Private third-party payors also have continued their efforts to control healthcare costs. We cannot assure you that our tenants and operators who currently depend on governmental or private payor reimbursement will be adequately reimbursed for the services they provide. Significant limits by governmental and private third-party payors on the scope of services reimbursed or on reimbursement rates and fees, whether from legislation, administrative actions or private payor efforts, could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity, financial condition and results of operations of certain of our tenants and operators, which could affect adversely their ability to comply with the terms of our leases and have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
The healthcare industry trend away from a traditional fee for service reimbursement model towards value-based payment approaches may negatively impact certain of our tenants’ revenues and profitability
Certain of our tenants, specifically those providers in the post-acute and general acute care hospital space, are subject to the broad trend in the healthcare industry toward value-based purchasing of healthcare services. These value-based purchasing programs include both public reporting of quality data and preventable adverse events tied to the quality and efficiency of care provided by facilities. Medicare and Medicaid require healthcare facilities, including hospitals and skilled nursing facilities, to report certain quality data to receive full reimbursement updates. In addition Medicare does not reimburse for care related to certain preventable adverse events (also called “never events”). Many large commercial payors currently require healthcare facilities to report quality data, and several commercial payors do not reimburse hospitals for certain preventable adverse events.
Recently, HHS indicated that it is particularly focused on tying Medicare payments to quality or value through alternative payment models, which generally aim to make providers attentive to the total costs of treatment. Examples of alternative payment models include bundled-payment arrangements. It is unclear whether such models will successfully coordinate care and reduce costs or whether they will decrease reimbursement. The value-based purchasing trend is not limited to the public sector. Several of the nation’s largest commercial payors have also expressed an intent to increase reliance on value-based reimbursement arrangements. Further, many large commercial payors require hospitals to report quality data, and several commercial payors do not reimburse hospitals for certain preventable adverse events.
We expect value-based purchasing programs, including programs that condition reimbursement on patient outcome measures, to become more common and to involve a higher percentage of reimbursement amounts. We are unable at this time to predict how this trend will affect the revenues and profitability of those of our tenants who are providers of healthcare services; however, if this trend significantly and adversely affects their profitability, it could in turn negatively affect their ability and willingness to comply with the terms of their leases with us and or renew those leases upon expiration, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
If controls imposed on certain of our tenants who provide healthcare services that are reimbursed by Medicare, Medicaid and other third-party payors to reduce admissions and length of stay affect inpatient volumes at our healthcare facilities, the financial condition or results of operations of those tenants could be adversely affected.
Controls imposed by Medicare, Medicaid and commercial third-party payors designed to reduce admissions and lengths of stay, commonly referred to as “utilization reviews,” have affected and are expected to continue to affect certain of our healthcare facilities, specifically our acute care hospitals and post-acute facilities. Utilization review entails the review of the admission and course of treatment of a patient by managed care plans. Inpatient utilization, average lengths of stay and occupancy rates continue to be negatively affected by payor-required preadmission authorization and utilization review and by payor pressures to maximize outpatient and alternative healthcare delivery services for less acutely ill patients. Efforts to impose more stringent cost controls and reductions are expected to continue, which could negatively impact the financial condition of our tenants who provide healthcare services in our hospitals and post-acute facilities. If so, this could adversely affect these tenants’ ability and willingness to comply with the terms of their leases with us and or renew those leases upon expiration, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

30



The implementation of new patient criteria for LTACs will change the basis upon which certain of our tenants are reimbursed by Medicare, which could adversely affect those tenants’ revenues and profitability.
 
As part of the Pathway for SGR Reform Act of 2013 enacted on December 26, 2013, Congress adopted various legislative changes impacting LTACs. These legislative changes create new Medicare criteria and payment rules for LTACs, and could have a material adverse impact on the revenues and profitability of the tenants of our LTACs. This material adverse impact could, in turn, negatively affect those tenants’ ability and willingness to comply with the terms of their leases with us or renew those leases upon expiration, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
The hospitals on or near whose campuses our MOBs are located and their affiliated health systems could fail to remain competitive or financially viable, which could adversely impact their ability to attract physicians and physician groups to our MOBs.
Our MOB operations depend on the competitiveness and financial viability of the hospitals on or near whose campuses our MOBs are located and their ability to attract physicians and other healthcare-related clients to our MOBs. The viability of these hospitals, in turn, depends on factors such as the quality and mix of healthcare services provided, competition for patients, physicians and physician groups, demographic trends in the surrounding community, market position and growth potential, as well as the ability of the affiliated health systems to provide economies of scale and access to capital. If a hospital on or near whose campus one of our MOBs is located fails or becomes unable to meet its financial obligations, and if an affiliated health system is unable to support that hospital, the hospital may be unable to compete successfully or could be forced to close or relocate, which could adversely impact its ability to attract physicians and other healthcare-related clients. Because we rely on proximity to and affiliations with hospitals to create leasing demand in our MOBs, a hospital’s inability to remain competitive or financially viable, or to attract physicians and physician groups, could materially adversely affect our MOB operations and have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Our development and redevelopment projects, including projects undertaken through our joint ventures, may not yield anticipated returns.
We consider and, when appropriate, invest in various development and redevelopment projects. In deciding whether to make an investment in a particular project, we make certain assumptions regarding the expected future performance of the property. Our assumptions are subject to risks generally associated with development and redevelopment projects, including, among others, that:
We may be unable to obtain financing for the project on favorable terms or at all;
We may not complete the project on schedule or within budgeted amounts;
We may encounter delays in obtaining or fail to obtain all necessary zoning, land use, building, occupancy, environmental and other governmental permits and authorizations, or underestimate the costs necessary to develop or redevelop the property to market standards;
Construction or other delays may provide tenants or residents the right to terminate preconstruction leases or cause us to incur additional costs;
Volatility in the price of construction materials or labor may increase our project costs;
In the case of our MOB developments, hospitals or health systems may maintain significant decision-making authority with respect to the development schedule;
Our builders may fail to perform or satisfy the expectations of our clients or prospective clients;
We may incorrectly forecast risks associated with development in new geographic regions;
Tenants may not lease space at the quantity or rental rate levels or on the schedule projected;
Demand for our project may decrease prior to completion, including due to competition from other developments; and
Lease rates and rents at newly developed or redeveloped properties may fluctuate based on factors beyond our control, including market and economic conditions.
If any of the risks described above occur, our development and redevelopment projects, including projects undertaken through our joint ventures, may not yield anticipated returns, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

31


Our investments in joint ventures and unconsolidated entities could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority, our reliance on our joint venture partners’ financial condition, any disputes that may arise between us and our joint venture partners, and our exposure to potential losses from the actions of our joint venture partners.
As of December 31, 2015, we owned 34 MOBs, 15 seniors housing communities and one LTAC through consolidated joint ventures, and we had ownership interests ranging between 5% and 25% in seven MOBs, 20 seniors housing communities and 14 skilled nursing facilities through investments in unconsolidated entities. In addition, we had a 34% ownership interest in Atria and a 9.9% interest in Ardent as of December 31, 2015. These joint ventures and unconsolidated entities involve risks not present with respect to our wholly owned properties, including the following:
We may be unable to take actions that are opposed by our joint venture partners under arrangements that require us to share decision-making authority over major decisions affecting the ownership or operation of the joint venture and any property owned by the joint venture, such as the sale or financing of the property or the making of additional capital contributions for the benefit of the property;
For joint ventures in which we have a noncontrolling interest, our joint venture partners may take actions that we oppose;
Our ability to sell or transfer our interest in a joint venture to a third party may be restricted if we fail to obtain the prior consent of our joint venture partners;
Our joint venture partners may become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions, which could delay construction or development of a property or increase our financial commitment to the joint venture;
Our joint venture partners may have business interests or goals with respect to a property that conflict with our business interests and goals, including with respect to the timing, terms and strategies for investment, which could increase the likelihood of disputes regarding the ownership, management or disposition of the property;
Disagreements with our joint venture partners could result in litigation or arbitration that increases our expenses, distracts our officers and directors, and disrupts the day-to-day operations of the property, including by delaying important decisions until the dispute is resolved; and
We may suffer losses as a result of actions taken by our joint venture partners with respect to our joint venture investments.
Events that adversely affect the ability of seniors and their families to afford daily resident fees at our seniors housing communities could cause our occupancy rates, resident fee revenues and results of operations to decline.
Assisted and independent living services generally are not reimbursable under government reimbursement programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. A large majority of the resident fee revenues generated by our senior living operations, therefore, are derived from private pay sources consisting of the income or assets of residents or their family members. In light of the significant expense associated with building new properties and staffing and other costs of providing services, typically only seniors with income or assets that meet or exceed the comparable region median can afford the daily resident and care fees at our seniors housing communities, and a weak economy, depressed housing market or changes in demographics could adversely affect their continued ability to do so. If the managers of our seniors housing communities are unable to attract and retain seniors that have sufficient income, assets or other resources to pay the fees associated with assisted and independent living services, the occupancy rates, resident fee revenues and results of operations of our senior living operations could decline, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
The amount and scope of insurance coverage provided by our policies and policies maintained by our tenants, operators and managers may not adequately insure against losses.
We maintain or require in our lease, management and other agreements that our tenants, operators and managers maintain all applicable lines of insurance on our properties and their operations. Although we regularly review the amount and scope of insurance provided by our policies and required to be maintained by our tenants, operators and managers and believe the coverage provided to be customary for similarly situated companies in our industry, we cannot assure you that we or our tenants, operators and managers will continue to be able to maintain adequate levels of insurance. We also cannot assure you that we or our tenants, operators and managers will maintain the required coverages, that we will continue to require the same levels of insurance under our lease, management and other agreements, that such insurance will be available at a reasonable cost in the future or that the policies maintained will fully cover all losses on our properties upon the occurrence of a catastrophic event, nor can we make any guaranty as to the future financial viability of the insurers that underwrite our policies and the policies maintained by our tenants, operators and managers.

32


For various reasons, including to reduce and manage costs, many healthcare companies utilize different organizational and corporate structures coupled with self-insurance trusts or captive programs that may provide less insurance coverage than a traditional insurance policy. Companies that insure any part of their general and professional liability risks through their own captive limited purpose entities generally estimate the future cost of general and professional liability through actuarial studies that rely primarily on historical data. However, due to the rise in the number and severity of professional claims against healthcare providers, these actuarial studies may underestimate the future cost of claims, and reserves for future claims may not be adequate to cover the actual cost of those claims. As a result, the tenants and operators of our properties who self-insure could incur large funded and unfunded general and professional liability expenses, which could materially adversely affect their liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and, in turn, their ability to satisfy their obligations to us. If we or the managers of our senior living operations decide to implement a captive or self-insurance program, any large funded and unfunded general and professional liability expenses incurred could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur, we could incur substantial liability or lose all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenues from the property. Following the occurrence of such an event, we might nevertheless remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the property. We cannot assure you that material uninsured losses, or losses in excess of insurance proceeds, will not occur in the future.
Significant legal actions or regulatory proceedings could subject us or our tenants, operators and managers to increased operating costs and substantial uninsured liabilities, which could materially adversely affect our or their liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.
From time to time, we may be subject to claims brought against us in lawsuits and other legal or regulatory proceedings arising out of our alleged actions or the alleged actions of our tenants, operators and managers for which such tenants, operators and managers may have agreed to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless. An unfavorable resolution of any such litigation or proceeding could materially adversely affect our or their liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
In certain cases, we and our tenants, operators and managers may be subject to professional liability claims brought by plaintiffs’ attorneys seeking significant punitive damages and attorneys’ fees. Due to the historically high frequency and severity of professional liability claims against seniors housing and healthcare providers, the availability of professional liability insurance has decreased and the premiums on such insurance coverage remain costly. As a result, insurance protection against such claims may not be sufficient to cover all claims against us or our tenants, operators or managers, and may not be available at a reasonable cost. If we or our tenants, operators and managers are unable to maintain adequate insurance coverage or are required to pay punitive damages, we or they may be exposed to substantial liabilities.
The occurrence of cyber incidents could disrupt our operations, result in the loss of confidential information and/or damage our business relationships and reputation.
As our reliance on technology has increased, our business is subject to greater risk from cyber incidents, including attempts to gain unauthorized access to our or our managers’ systems to disrupt operations, corrupt data or steal confidential information, and other electronic security breaches.  While we and our managers have implemented measures to help mitigate these threats, such measures cannot guarantee that we will be successful in preventing a cyber incident.  The occurrence of a cyber incident could disrupt our operations, or the operations of our managers, compromise the confidential information of our employees or the residents in our seniors housing communities, and/or damage our business relationships and reputation.
Reductions in federal government spending, tax reform initiatives or other federal legislation to address the federal government’s projected operating deficit could have a material adverse effect on our operators’ liquidity, financial condition or results of operations.
President Obama and members of the U.S. Congress have approved or proposed various spending cuts and tax reform initiatives that have resulted or could result in changes (including substantial reductions in funding) to Medicare, Medicaid or Medicare Advantage Plans. Any such existing or future federal legislation relating to deficit reduction that reduces reimbursement payments to healthcare providers could have a material adverse effect on certain of our operators’ liquidity, financial condition or results of operations, which could adversely affect their ability to satisfy their obligations to us and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Our operators may be sued under a federal whistleblower statute.
Our operators who engage in business with the federal government may be sued under a federal whistleblower statute designed to combat fraud and abuse in the healthcare industry. See “Governmental Regulation—Healthcare Regulation” included in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These lawsuits can involve significant monetary damages and award

33


bounties to private plaintiffs who successfully bring these suits. If any of these lawsuits were brought against our operators, such suits combined with increased operating costs and substantial uninsured liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our operators’ liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and on their ability to satisfy their obligations under our leases, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
We could incur substantial liabilities and costs if any of our properties are found to be contaminated with hazardous substances or we become involved in any environmental disputes.
Under federal and state environmental laws and regulations, a current or former owner of real property may be liable for costs related to the investigation, removal and remediation of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum that are released from or are present at or under, or that are disposed of in connection with such property. Owners of real property may also face other environmental liabilities, including government fines and penalties imposed by regulatory authorities and damages for injuries to persons, property or natural resources. Environmental laws and regulations often impose liability without regard to whether the owner was aware of, or was responsible for, the presence, release or disposal of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum. In certain circumstances, environmental liability may result from the activities of a current or former operator of the property. Although we generally have indemnification rights against the current operators of our properties for contamination caused by them, such indemnification may not adequately cover all environmental costs. See “Governmental Regulation—Environmental Regulation” included in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to attract and retain talented employees, and the loss of any one of our key personnel could adversely impact our business.
The success of our business depends, in part, on the leadership and performance of our executive management team and key employees, and our ability to attract, retain and motivate talented employees could significantly impact our future performance. Competition for these individuals is intense, and we cannot assure you that we will retain our key officers and employees or that we will be able to attract and retain other highly qualified individuals in the future. Losing any one or more of these persons could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Failure to maintain effective internal controls could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are required to provide a report by management on internal control over financial reporting, including management’s assessment of the effectiveness of such control. Because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls, or fraud, effective internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatement and can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls over financial reporting and our operating internal controls, including any failure to implement required new or improved controls as a result of changes to our business or otherwise, or if we experience difficulties in their implementation, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely harmed and we could fail to meet our reporting obligations.
Economic and other conditions that negatively affect geographic locations to which a greater percentage of our NOI is attributed could adversely affect our financial results.
For the year ended December 31, 2015, approximately 37.7% of our total NOI (excluding amounts in discontinued operations) was derived from properties located in California (14.7%), Texas (6.7%), New York (6.0%), Illinois (5.5%), and Florida (4.8%). As a result, we are subject to increased exposure to adverse conditions affecting these regions, including downturns in the local economies or changes in local real estate conditions, increased construction and competition or decreased demand for our properties, regional climate events and changes in state-specific legislation, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We may be adversely affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
Our ownership of properties in Canada and the United Kingdom currently subjects us to fluctuations in the exchange rates between U.S. dollars and Canadian dollars or the British pound, which may, from time to time, impact our financial condition and results of operations. If we continue to expand our international presence through investments in, or acquisitions or development of, seniors housing or healthcare assets outside the United States, Canada or the United Kingdom, we may transact business in other foreign currencies. Although we may pursue hedging alternatives, including borrowing in local currencies, to protect against foreign currency fluctuations, we cannot assure you that such fluctuations will not have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

34


Risks Arising from Our Capital Structure
We may become more leveraged.
As of December 31, 2015, we had approximately $11.2 billion of outstanding indebtedness. The instruments governing our existing indebtedness permit us to incur substantial additional debt, including secured debt, and we may satisfy our capital and liquidity needs through additional borrowings. A high level of indebtedness would require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payment of debt service, thereby reducing the funds available to implement our business strategy and make distributions to stockholders. A high level of indebtedness could also have the following consequences:
Potential limits on our ability to adjust rapidly to changing market conditions and vulnerability in the event of a downturn in general economic conditions or in the real estate or healthcare industries;
Potential impairment of our ability to obtain additional financing to execute on our business strategy; and
Potential downgrade in the rating of our debt securities by one or more rating agencies, which could have the effect of, among other things, limiting our access to capital and increasing our cost of borrowing.
In addition, from time to time, we mortgage certain of our properties to secure payment of indebtedness. If we are unable to meet our mortgage payments, then the encumbered properties could be foreclosed upon or transferred to the mortgagee with a resulting loss of income and asset value.
We are exposed to increases in interest rates, which could reduce our profitability and adversely impact our ability to refinance existing debt, sell assets or engage in acquisition, investment, development and redevelopment activity, and our decision to hedge against interest rate risk might not be effective.
We receive a significant portion of our revenues by leasing assets under long-term triple-net leases that generally provide for fixed rental rates subject to annual escalations, while certain of our debt obligations are floating rate obligations with interest and related payments that vary with the movement of LIBOR, Bankers’ Acceptance or other indexes. The generally fixed rate nature of a significant portion of our revenues and the variable rate nature of certain of our debt obligations create interest rate risk. Although our operating assets provide a partial hedge against interest rate fluctuations, if interest rates rise, the costs of our existing floating rate debt and any new debt that we incur would increase. These increased costs could reduce our profitability, impair our ability to meet our debt obligations, or increase the cost of financing our acquisition, investment, development and redevelopment activity. An increase in interest rates also could limit our ability to refinance existing debt upon maturity or cause us to pay higher rates upon refinancing, as well as decrease the amount that third parties are willing to pay for our assets, thereby limiting our ability to promptly reposition our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions.
We may seek to manage our exposure to interest rate volatility with hedging arrangements that involve additional risks, including the risks that counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements, that these arrangements may not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes, that the amount of income we earn from hedging transactions may be limited by federal tax provisions governing REITs, and that these arrangements may cause us to pay higher interest rates on our debt obligations than otherwise would be the case. Moreover, no amount of hedging activity can fully insulate us from the risks associated with changes in interest rates. Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate risk, if we choose to engage in such activities, could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Limitations on our ability to access capital could have an adverse effect on our ability to make required payments on our debt obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to raise the capital necessary to meet our debt service obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy, if our cash flow from operations is insufficient to satisfy these needs, and the failure to do so could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. Although we believe that we have sufficient access to capital and other sources of funding to meet our expected liquidity needs, we cannot assure you that conditions in the capital markets will not deteriorate or that our access to capital and other sources of funding will not become constrained, which could adversely affect the availability and terms of future borrowings, renewals or refinancings and our results of operation and financial condition. If we cannot access capital at an acceptable cost or at all, we may be required to liquidate one or more investments in properties at times that may not permit us to maximize the return on those investments or that could result in adverse tax consequences to us.
As a public company, our access to debt and equity capital depends, in part, on the trading prices of our senior notes and common stock, which, in turn, depend upon market conditions that change from time to time, such as the market’s perception

35


of our financial condition, our growth potential and our current and expected future earnings and cash distributions. Our failure to meet the market’s expectation with regard to future earnings and cash distributions or a significant downgrade in the ratings assigned to our long-term debt could impact our ability to access capital or increase our borrowing costs. We also rely on the financial institutions that are parties to our unsecured revolving credit facility. If these institutions become capital constrained, tighten their lending standards or become insolvent or if they experience excessive volumes of borrowing requests from other borrowers within a short period of time, they may be unable or unwilling to honor their funding commitments to us, which would adversely affect our ability to draw on our unsecured revolving credit facility and, over time, could negatively impact our ability to consummate acquisitions, repay indebtedness as it matures, fund capital expenditures or make distributions to our stockholders.
Covenants in the instruments governing our existing indebtedness limit our operational flexibility, and a covenant breach could materially adversely affect our operations.
The terms of the instruments governing our existing indebtedness require us to comply with certain customary financial and other covenants, such as maintaining debt service coverage, leverage ratios and minimum net worth requirements. Our continued ability to incur additional debt and to conduct business in general is subject to our compliance with these covenants, which limit our operational flexibility. Breaches of these covenants could result in defaults under the applicable debt instruments and could trigger defaults under any of our other indebtedness that is cross-defaulted against such instruments, even if we satisfy our payment obligations. Financial and other covenants that limit our operational flexibility, as well as defaults resulting from our breach of any of these covenants, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Risks Arising from Our Status as a REIT
Loss of our status as a REIT would have significant adverse consequences for us and the value of our common stock.
If we lose our status as a REIT (currently or with respect to any tax years for which the statute of limitations has not expired), we will face serious tax consequences that will substantially reduce the funds available to satisfy our obligations, to implement our business strategy and to make distributions to our stockholders for each of the years involved because:
We would not be allowed a deduction for distributions to stockholders in computing our taxable income and would be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates;
We could be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax and increased state and local taxes; and
Unless we are entitled to relief under statutory provisions, we could not elect to be subject to tax as a REIT for four taxable years following the year during which we were disqualified.
In addition, in such event we would no longer be required to pay dividends to maintain REIT status, which could adversely affect the value of our common stock.
Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations. The determination of factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control, as well as new legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions, may adversely affect our investors or our ability to remain qualified as a REIT for tax purposes. Although we believe that we currently qualify as a REIT, we cannot assure you that we will continue to qualify for all future periods.
The 90% distribution requirement will decrease our liquidity and may limit our ability to engage in otherwise beneficial transactions.
To comply with the 90% distribution requirement applicable to REITs and to avoid the nondeductible excise tax, we must make distributions to our stockholders. See “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Requirements for Qualification as a REIT—Annual Distribution Requirements” included in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Such distributions reduce the funds we have available to finance our investment, acquisition, development and redevelopment activity and may limit our ability to engage in transactions that are otherwise in the best interests of our stockholders.
Although we do not anticipate any inability to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement, from time to time, we may not have sufficient cash or other liquid assets to do so. For example, timing differences between the actual receipt of income and actual payment of deductible expenses, on the one hand, and the inclusion of that income and deduction of those expenses in arriving at our taxable income, on the other hand, or non-deductible expenses such as principal amortization or repayments or capital expenditures in excess of non-cash deductions may prevent us from having sufficient cash or liquid assets to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement.
In the event that timing differences occur or we decide to retain cash or to distribute such greater amount as may be necessary to avoid income and excise taxation, we may seek to borrow funds, issue additional equity securities, pay taxable

36


stock dividends, distribute other property or securities or engage in a transaction intended to enable us to meet the REIT distribution requirements. Any of these actions may require us to raise additional capital to meet our obligations; however, see “—Risks Arising from Our Capital Structure—Limitations on our ability to access capital could have an adverse effect on our ability to make required payments on our debt obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy.” The terms of the instruments governing our existing indebtedness restrict our ability to engage in certain of these transactions.
To preserve our qualification as a REIT, our certificate of incorporation contains ownership limits with respect to our capital stock that may delay, defer or prevent a change of control of our company.
To assist us in preserving our qualification as a REIT, our certificate of incorporation provides that if a person acquires beneficial ownership of more than 9.0% of our outstanding common stock or more than 9.9% of our outstanding preferred stock, the shares that are beneficially owned in excess of the applicable limit are considered “excess shares” and are automatically deemed transferred to a trust for the benefit of a charitable institution or other qualifying organization selected by our Board of Directors. The trust is entitled to all dividends with respect to the excess shares and the trustee may exercise all voting power over the excess shares. In addition, we have the right to purchase the excess shares for a price equal to the lesser of (i) the price per share in the transaction that created the excess shares or (ii) the market price on the day we purchase the shares, but if we do not purchase the excess shares, the trustee of the trust is required to transfer the shares at the direction of our Board of Directors. These ownership limits could delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.
ITEM 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
ITEM 2.    Properties
Seniors Housing and Healthcare Properties
As of December 31, 2015, we owned approximately 1,300 properties (including properties classified as held for sale), consisting of seniors housing communities, MOBs, skilled nursing facilities, specialty hospitals and general acute care hospitals, and we had four properties under development. We believe that maintaining a balanced portfolio of high-quality assets diversified by investment type, geographic location, asset type, tenant/operator, revenue source and operating model makes us less susceptible to single-state regulatory or reimbursement changes, regional climate events and local economic downturns and diminishes the risk that any single factor or event could materially harm our business.
As of December 31, 2015, we had $2.0 billion aggregate principal amount of mortgage loan indebtedness outstanding, secured by 157 of our properties. Excluding those portions attributed to our joint venture and operating partners, our share of mortgage loan indebtedness outstanding was $1.9 billion.

37


The following table provides additional information regarding the geographic diversification of our portfolio of properties as of December 31, 2015 (including properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities, but excluding properties classified as held for sale):
 
Seniors Housing
Communities
 
Skilled Nursing
Facilities
 
MOBs
 
Specialty Hospitals
 
General Acute Care
Geographic Location
Number of
Properties
 
Units
 
Number of Properties
 
Licensed
Beds
 
Number of Properties
 
Square Feet
 
Number of Properties
 
Licensed Beds
 
Number of Properties
 
Licensed Beds
Alabama
6

 
371

 

 

 
4

 
468,887

 

 

 

 

Arizona
28

 
2,608

 

 

 
13

 
829,451

 
3

 
169

 

 

Arkansas
4

 
262

 

 

 
1

 
4,596

 

 

 

 

California
86

 
9,650

 
4

 
483

 
25

 
2,126,221

 
6

 
503

 

 

Colorado
19

 
1,723

 
2

 
190

 
13

 
890,907

 
1

 
68

 

 

Connecticut
14

 
1,623

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

District of Columbia

 

 

 

 
2

 
101,580

 

 

 

 

Florida
51

 
4,772

 

 

 
19

 
583,081

 
6

 
511

 

 

Georgia
20

 
1,743

 
1

 
162

 
19

 
1,495,644

 

 

 

 

Idaho
1

 
70

 
6

 
513

 

 

 

 

 

 

Illinois
25

 
2,938

 
1

 
82

 
37

 
1,543,686

 
4

 
430

 

 

Indiana
11

 
964

 
8

 
1,109

 
22

 
1,556,964

 
1

 
59

 

 

Kansas
9

 
540

 

 

 
1

 
32,540

 

 

 

 

Kentucky
10

 
919

 
3

 
377

 
4

 
172,977

 
1

 
384

 

 

Louisiana
1

 
58

 

 

 
5

 
361,372

 
1

 
168

 

 

Maine
6

 
445

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maryland
5

 
360

 

 

 
2

 
82,663

 

 

 

 

Massachusetts
19

 
2,104

 
9

 
1,045

 

 

 
2

 
109

 

 

Michigan
24

 
1,560

 

 

 
14

 
599,339

 

 

 

 

Minnesota
18

 
1,017

 

 

 
5

 
353,200

 

 

 

 

Mississippi

 

 

 

 
1

 
50,575

 

 

 

 

Missouri
2

 
153

 

 

 
20

 
1,096,009

 
2

 
227

 

 

Montana
2

 
209

 
2

 
276

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nebraska
1

 
135

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nevada
4

 
462

 

 

 
5

 
415,629

 
1

 
52

 

 

New Hampshire
1

 
125

 
1

 
290

 

 

 

 

 

 

New Jersey
13

 
1,184

 
1

 
153

 
3

 
36,664

 

 

 

 

New Mexico
5

 
589

 

 

 

 

 
2

 
123

 
4

 
544

New York
42

 
4,630

 

 

 
4

 
243,535

 

 

 

 

North Carolina
23

 
2,242

 
3

 
297

 
20

 
759,422

 
1

 
124

 

 

North Dakota
2

 
115

 

 

 
1

 
114,000

 

 

 

 

Ohio
22

 
1,417

 
6

 
907

 
28

 
1,221,287

 
1

 
50

 

 

Oklahoma
8

 
463

 

 

 

 

 
1

 
59

 
4

 
924

Oregon
29

 
2,574

 

 

 
1

 
105,375

 

 

 

 

Pennsylvania
32

 
2,455

 
4

 
620

 
10

 
877,878

 
2

 
115

 

 

Rhode Island
6

 
596

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

South Carolina
5

 
388

 

 

 
20

 
1,103,828

 

 

 

 

South Dakota
4

 
182

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tennessee
18

 
1,467

 

 

 
11

 
404,511

 
1

 
49

 

 

Texas
52

 
4,014

 

 

 
22

 
1,330,987

 
10

 
657

 
1

 
445

Utah
3

 
321

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vermont

 

 
1

 
144

 

 

 

 

 

 

Virginia
8

 
658

 
3

 
432

 
5

 
231,463

 

 

 

 

Washington
25

 
2,441

 
8

 
737

 
10

 
578,975

 

 

 

 

West Virginia
2

 
117

 
4

 
326

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wisconsin
69

 
2,958

 

 

 
21

 
1,104,558

 

 

 

 

Wyoming
2

 
168

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total U.S.
737

 
63,790

 
67

 
8,143

 
368

 
20,877,804

 
46

 
3,857


9


1,913

Canada
41

 
4,493

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United Kingdom
10

 
663

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
3

 
121

Total
788

 
68,946

 
67

 
8,143

 
368

 
20,877,804

 
46

 
3,857


12


2,034


38


Corporate Offices
Our headquarters are located in Chicago, Illinois, and we have additional corporate offices in: Louisville, Kentucky; Plano, Texas; and Irvine, California. We lease all of our corporate offices.
ITEM 3.    Legal Proceedings
The information contained in “Note 16—Litigation” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference into this Item 3. Except as set forth therein, we are not a party to, nor is any of our property the subject of, any material pending legal proceedings.
As previously disclosed, in July 2014, we voluntarily contacted the SEC to advise it of the determination by our former registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”), that it was not independent of us due solely to an inappropriate personal relationship between an EY partner, who until June 30, 2014 was the lead audit partner on our 2014 audit and quarterly review and was previously an audit engagement partner on our 2013 and 2012 audits, and an individual in a financial reporting oversight role at our company. We have cooperated with the SEC and intend to continue to do so with respect to its inquiries related to this matter. At this time, the matter is ongoing and we cannot reasonably assess its timing or outcome.
ITEM 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5.    Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
Our common stock, par value $0.25 per share, is listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the symbol “VTR.” The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported on the NYSE and the dividends declared per share.
 
Sales Price of
Common Stock
 
Dividends
Declared
 
High
 
Low
 
2014
 
 
 
 
 
First Quarter
$
63.67

 
$
56.79

 
$
0.725

Second Quarter
68.40

 
61.29

 
0.725

Third Quarter
66.04

 
60.70

 
0.725

Fourth Quarter
74.44

 
62.48

 
0.79

2015
 
 
 
 
 
First Quarter
$
80.95

 
$
69.12

 
$
0.79

Second Quarter
76.90

 
61.82

 
0.79

Third Quarter
68.52

 
52.66

 
0.73

Fourth Quarter
58.38

 
49.68

 
0.73

As of February 10, 2016, we had 336,070,352 shares of our common stock outstanding held by approximately 5,102 stockholders of record.
Dividends and Distributions
We pay regular quarterly dividends to holders of our common stock to comply with the provisions of the Code governing REITs. On February 12, 2016, our Board of Directors declared the first quarterly installment of our 2016 dividend on our common stock in the amount of $0.73 per share, payable in cash on March 31, 2016 to stockholders of record on March 7, 2015. We expect to distribute at least 100% of our taxable net income, after the use of any net operating loss carryforwards, to our stockholders for 2016. See “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Requirements for Qualification as a REIT—Annual Distribution Requirements” included in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

39


In general, our Board of Directors makes decisions regarding the nature, frequency and amount of our dividends on a quarterly basis. Because the Board considers many factors when making these decisions, including our present and future liquidity needs, our current and projected financial condition and results of operations and the performance and credit quality of our tenants, operators, borrowers and managers, we cannot assure you that we will maintain the practice of paying regular quarterly dividends to continue to qualify as a REIT. Please see “Cautionary Statements” and the risk factors included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of other factors that may affect our distribution policy.
Prior to its suspension in July 2014, our stockholders were entitled to reinvest all or a portion of any cash distribution on their shares of our common stock by participating in our Distribution Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (“DRIP”), subject to the terms of the plan. See “Note 17—Permanent and Temporary Equity” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We may determine whether or not to reinstate the DRIP at any time, in our sole discretion.
Director and Employee Stock Sales
Certain of our directors, executive officers and other employees have adopted and, from time to time in the future, may adopt non-discretionary, written trading plans that comply with Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act, or otherwise monetize, gift or transfer their equity-based compensation. These transactions typically are conducted for estate, tax and financial planning purposes and are subject to compliance with our Amended and Restated Securities Trading Policy and Procedures (“Securities Trading Policy”), the minimum stock ownership requirements contained in our Guidelines on Governance and all applicable laws and regulations.
Our Securities Trading Policy expressly prohibits our directors, executive officers and employees from buying or selling derivatives with respect to our securities or other financial instruments that are designed to hedge or offset a decrease in the market value of our securities and from engaging in short sales with respect to our securities. In addition, our Securities Trading Policy prohibits our directors and executive officers from holding our securities in margin accounts or pledging our securities to secure loans without the prior approval of our Audit and Compliance Committee. Each of our executive officers has advised us that he or she is in compliance with the Securities Trading Policy and has not pledged any of our equity securities to secure margin or other loans.
Stock Repurchases
The table below summarizes repurchases of our common stock made during the quarter ended December 31, 2015:
 
Number of Shares
Repurchased (1)
 
Average Price
Per Share
October 1 through October 31

 
$

November 1 through November 30
1,023

 
$
49.68

December 1 through December 31
164

 
$
56.43

    
(1)
Repurchases represent shares withheld to pay taxes on the vesting of restricted stock granted to employees under our 2006 Incentive Plan or 2012 Incentive Plan or restricted stock units granted to employees under the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. (“NHP”) 2005 Performance Incentive Plan and assumed by us in connection with our acquisition of NHP. The value of the shares withheld is the closing price of our common stock on the date the vesting or exercise occurred (or, if not a trading day, the immediately preceding trading day) or the fair market value of our common stock at the time of the exercise, as the case may be.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
On January 16, 2015, in connection with our acquisition of HCT, each of the 7,057,271 issued and outstanding limited partnership units of American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust Operating Partnership, L.P. (subsequently renamed Ventas Realty Capital Healthcare Trust Operating Partnership, L.P.), a limited partnership in which HCT was the sole general partner prior to the acquisition, was converted into a newly created class of limited partnership units (“Class C Units”) at the 0.1688 exchange ratio payable to HCT stockholders in the acquisition, net of any Class C Units withheld to pay taxes. The Class C Units may be redeemed at the election of the holder for one share of our common stock per unit or, at our option, an equivalent amount in cash, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. The Class C Units were issued solely to “accredited investors” (as such term is defined in Rule 501 under the Securities Act) in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

40


Stock Performance Graph
The following performance graph compares the cumulative total return (including dividends) to the holders of our common stock from December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2015, with the cumulative total returns of the NYSE Composite Index, the FTSE NAREIT Composite REIT Index (the “Composite REIT Index”) and the S&P 500 Index over the same period. The comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2010 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indexes and assumes reinvestment of dividends, as applicable. We have included the NYSE Composite Index in the performance graph because our common stock is listed on the NYSE, and we have included the S&P 500 Index because we are a member of the S&P 500. We have included the Composite REIT Index because we believe that it is most representative of the industries in which we compete, or otherwise provides a fair basis for comparison with us, and is therefore particularly relevant to an assessment of our performance. The figures in the table below are rounded to the nearest dollar.
 
12/31/2010
 
12/31/2011
 
12/31/2012
 
12/31/2013
 
12/31/2014
 
12/31/2015
Ventas
$100
 
$109.77
 
$134.26
 
$124.00
 
$162.35
 
$153.33
NYSE Composite Index
$100
 
$96.43
 
$112.11
 
$141.71
 
$151.44
 
$145.40
Composite REIT Index
$100
 
$107.30
 
$128.47
 
$131.48
 
$167.28
 
$170.71
S&P 500 Index
$100
 
$102.11
 
$118.44
 
$156.78
 
$178.22
 
$180.67




41


ITEM 6.    Selected Financial Data
You should read the following selected financial data in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as acquisitions, dispositions, changes in accounting policies and other items may impact the comparability of the financial data.
 
As of and For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Operating Data
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
1,346,046

 
$
1,138,457

 
$
1,036,356

 
$
894,495

 
$
596,445

Resident fees and services
1,811,255

 
1,552,951

 
1,406,005

 
1,227,124

 
865,800

Interest expense
367,114

 
292,065

 
249,009

 
199,801

 
114,492

Property-level operating expenses
1,383,640

 
1,195,388

 
1,109,925

 
966,812

 
645,082

General, administrative and professional fees
128,035

 
121,738

 
115,083

 
98,489

 
74,529

Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders, including real estate dispositions
406,740

 
376,032

 
374,338

 
202,159

 
323,007

Discontinued operations
11,103

 
99,735

 
79,171

 
160,641

 
41,486

Net income attributable to common stockholders
417,843

 
475,767

 
453,509

 
362,800

 
364,493

Per Share Data
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders, including real estate dispositions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
1.23

 
$
1.28

 
$
1.28

 
$
0.69

 
$
1.42

Diluted
$
1.22

 
$
1.26

 
$
1.27

 
$
0.68

 
$
1.40

Net income attributable to common stockholders:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
1.26

 
$
1.62

 
$
1.55

 
$
1.24

 
$
1.60

Diluted
$
1.25

 
$
1.60

 
$
1.54

 
$
1.23

 
$
1.58

Dividends declared per common share
$
3.04

 
$
2.965

 
$
2.74

 
$
2.48

 
$
2.30

Other Data
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
1,391,767

 
$
1,254,845

 
$
1,194,755

 
$
992,816

 
$
773,197

Net cash used in investing activities
(2,423,692
)
 
(2,055,040
)
 
(1,282,760
)
 
(2,169,689
)
 
(997,439
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
1,030,122

 
758,057

 
114,996

 
1,198,914

 
248,282

FFO (1)
1,365,408

 
1,273,680

 
1,208,458

 
1,024,567

 
824,851

Normalized FFO (1)
1,493,683

 
1,330,018

 
1,220,709

 
1,120,225

 
776,963

Balance Sheet Data
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate investments, at cost
$
23,802,454

 
$
20,196,770

 
$
19,798,805

 
$
19,745,607

 
$
17,830,262

Cash and cash equivalents
53,023

 
55,348

 
57,690

 
67,908

 
45,807

Total assets
22,261,918

 
21,165,913

 
18,706,921

 
18,980,000

 
17,271,910

Senior notes payable and other debt
11,206,996

 
10,844,351

 
8,295,908

 
8,413,646

 
6,429,116

_______________

(1)
We believe that net income, as defined by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), is the most appropriate earnings measurement. However, we consider Funds From Operations (“FFO”) and normalized FFO to be

42


appropriate measures of operating performance of an equity REIT. In particular, we believe that normalized FFO is useful because it allows investors, analysts and our management to compare our operating performance to the operating performance of other real estate companies and between periods on a consistent basis without having to account for differences caused by unanticipated items and other events such as transactions and litigation. In some cases, we provide information about identified non-cash components of FFO and normalized FFO because it allows investors, analysts and our management to assess the impact of those items on our financial statements.

We use the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) definition of FFO. NAREIT defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of real estate property, including gain on re-measurement of equity method investments, and impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate, plus real estate depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. We define normalized FFO as FFO excluding the following income and expense items (which may be recurring in nature): (a) merger-related costs and expenses, including amortization of intangibles, transition and integration expenses, and deal costs and expenses, including expenses and recoveries relating to our acquisition lawsuits; (b) the impact of any expenses related to asset impairment and valuation allowances, the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees, or additional costs, expenses, discounts, make-whole payments, penalties or premiums incurred as a result of early retirement or payment of our debt; (c) the non-cash effect of income tax benefits or expenses and derivative transactions that have non-cash mark-to-market impacts on our Consolidated Statements of Income; (d) the impact of future acquisitions, divestitures (including pursuant to tenant options to purchase) and capital transactions; (e) the financial impact of contingent consideration, severance-related costs, charitable donations made to the Ventas Charitable Foundation, gains and losses for non-operational foreign currency hedge agreements and changes in the fair value of financial instruments; and (f) expenses related to the re-audit and re-review in 2014 of our historical financial statements and related matters.

FFO and normalized FFO presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, or otherwise disclosed by us, may not be comparable to FFO and normalized FFO presented by other real estate companies due to the fact that not all real estate companies use the same definitions. FFO and normalized FFO (or either measure adjusted for non-cash items) should not be considered as alternatives to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as indicators of our financial performance or as alternatives to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as measures of our liquidity, nor are FFO and normalized FFO (or either measure adjusted for non-cash items) necessarily indicative of sufficient cash flow to fund all of our needs. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Funds From Operations and Normalized Funds from Operations” included in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a reconciliation of FFO and normalized FFO to our GAAP earnings.
ITEM 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion provides information that management believes is relevant to an understanding and assessment of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Ventas, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated or except where the context otherwise requires, “we,” “us” or “our”). You should read this discussion in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as it will help you understand:
Our company and the environment in which we operate;
Our 2015 highlights and other recent developments;
Our critical accounting policies and estimates;
Our results of operations for the last three years;
How we manage our assets and liabilities;
Our liquidity and capital resources;
Our cash flows; and
Our future contractual obligations.
Corporate and Operating Environment
We are a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) with a highly diversified portfolio of seniors housing and healthcare properties located throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. As of December 31, 2015, we owned approximately 1,300 properties (including properties classified as held for sale), consisting of seniors housing communities,

43


medical office buildings (“MOBs”), skilled nursing facilities, specialty hospitals and general acute care hospitals, and we had four properties under development. We are an S&P 500 company and currently headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.
We primarily invest in seniors housing and healthcare properties through acquisitions and lease our properties to unaffiliated tenants or operate them through independent third-party managers. As of December 31, 2015, we leased a total of 607 properties (excluding MOBs and properties classified as held for sale) to various healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures, and we engaged independent operators, such as Atria Senior Living, Inc. (“Atria”) and Sunrise Senior Living, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Sunrise”), to manage 304 of our seniors housing communities (excluding properties classified as held for sale) for us pursuant to long-term management agreements. Our three largest tenants, Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Brookdale Senior Living”), Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Kindred”) and Ardent Health Partners, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Ardent”), leased from us 140 properties (excluding six properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and one property managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to a long-term management agreement), 76 properties and ten properties, respectively, as of December 31, 2015.
Through our Lillibridge Healthcare Services, Inc. (“Lillibridge”) subsidiary and our ownership interest in PMB Real Estate Services LLC (“PMBRES”), we also provide MOB management, leasing, marketing, facility development and advisory services to highly rated hospitals and health systems throughout the United States. In addition, from time to time, we make secured and non-mortgage loans and other investments relating to seniors housing and healthcare operators or properties.
We conduct our operations through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties; senior living operations; and MOB operations. See “Note 20—Segment Information” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
As of December 31, 2015, our consolidated portfolio included 100% ownership interests in 1,190 properties and controlling joint venture interests in 50 properties, and we had non-controlling ownership interests in 41 properties through investments in unconsolidated entities. Through Lillibridge and PMBRES, we provided management and leasing services to third parties with respect to 79 MOBs as of December 31, 2015.
We aim to enhance shareholder value by delivering consistent, superior total returns through a strategy of: (1) generating reliable and growing cash flows; (2) maintaining a balanced, diversified portfolio of high-quality assets; and (3) preserving our financial strength, flexibility and liquidity.
Our ability to access capital in a timely and cost-effective manner is critical to the success of our business strategy because it affects our ability to satisfy existing obligations, including the repayment of maturing indebtedness, and to make future investments. Factors such as general market conditions, interest rates, credit ratings on our securities, expectations of our potential future earnings and cash distributions, and the trading price of our common stock that are beyond our control and fluctuate over time all impact our access to and cost of external capital. For that reason, we generally attempt to match the long-term duration of our investments in real property with long-term financing through the issuance of shares of our common stock or the incurrence of long-term fixed rate debt. At December 31, 2015, 19.3% of our consolidated debt (excluding debt related to properties classified as held for sale) was variable rate debt.
2015 Highlights and Other Recent Developments
Investments and Dispositions
In January 2015, we acquired American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust, Inc. (“HCT”) in a stock and cash transaction, which added 152 properties to our portfolio. We funded the transaction through the issuance of approximately 28.4 million shares of our common stock at $78.00 per share and 1.1 million limited partnership units.

On August 4, 2015, we completed our acquisition of Ardent Medical Services, Inc. (“AHS”) and simultaneous separation and sale of the Ardent hospital operating company (Ardent Health Partners, LLC, together with its subsidiaries “Ardent”) to a consortium composed of an entity controlled by Equity Group Investments, Ardent’s management team and us. As of the acquisition date, we recorded the estimated fair value of our investment in owned hospital and other real estate of approximately $1.3 billion.. At closing, we paid $26.3 million for our 9.9% interest in Ardent, which represents our estimate of the acquisition date fair value of this interest. Upon closing, we entered into a long-term triple-net master lease with Ardent to operate hospitals and other real estate we acquired.

During 2015, we made other investments totaling approximately $611.7 million, including the acquisition of eleven triple-net leased properties; eleven MOBs; and 12 skilled nursing facilities (all of which were disposed of as part of the CCP Spin-Off (as defined below)).

44



During 2015, we sold 39 triple-net leased properties and 26 MOBs for aggregate consideration of $541.0 million, including a $6.0 million lease termination fee.

During 2015, we received aggregate proceeds of $173.8 million in final repayment of loans receivable and sales of bonds we held, and recognized gains aggregating $7.7 million.
Capital and Dividends
In January 2015, we issued and sold 3,750,202 shares of common stock under our previous “at-the-market” (“ATM”) equity offering program for aggregate net proceeds of $285.4 million, after sales agent commissions of $4.4 million. Through the remainder of 2015 and in the first quarter of 2016 we have issued and sold a total of 5,084,302 shares of our common stock under our ATM equity offering program for aggregate net proceeds of $297.0 million, after sales agent commissions of $4.5 million.

In January 2015, we issued and sold $1.1 billion of senior notes with a weighted average interest rate below 3.7% and a weighted average maturity of 15 years. The issuances were composed of $900 million aggregate principal amount of USD senior notes and CAD notes of 250 million.

In July 2015, we issued and sold $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.125% senior notes due 2026 at a public offering price equal to 99.218% of par, for total proceeds of $496.1 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.

In August 2015, we completed a $900 million five year term loan having a variable interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.0 basis points (the “Ardent Term Loan”). The term loan matures in 2020.

In 2015, we repaid $305.0 million of our unsecured term loan due 2019 and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $1.6 million representing a write-off of the then unamortized deferred financing fees. Also, in May 2015, we repaid in full, at par, $234.4 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 6% senior notes due 2015.

In 2015, we paid an annual cash dividend on our common stock of $3.04 per share. On August 17, 2015, we also distributed a stock dividend of one Care Capital Properties, Inc. (“CCP”) common share for every four shares of Ventas common stock held as of the distribution record date of August 10, 2015. The stock dividend was valued at $8.51 per Ventas share based on the opening price of CCP stock on its first day of regular-way trading on the New York Stock Exchange.

In February 2016, we entered into a $200 million notional amount interest rate swap with a maturity of August 3, 2020 that effectively converts LIBOR-based floating rate debt to fixed rate debt, setting LIBOR at 1.132% through the maturity date of the swap. The maturity date of the Ardent Term Loan is also August 3, 2020.
Spin-Off
In August 2015, we completed the spin off of most of our post-acute/skilled nursing facility portfolio into an independent, publicly traded REIT named Care Capital Properties, Inc. (the “CCP Spin-Off”). The historical results of operations of the CCP properties as well as the related assets and liabilities are presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) set forth in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), as published by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions regarding future events that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We base these estimates on our experience and assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, if our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions or other matters had been different, we may have applied a different accounting treatment, resulting in a different presentation of our financial statements. We periodically reevaluate our estimates and assumptions, and in the event they prove to be different from actual results, we make adjustments in subsequent periods to reflect more current estimates and assumptions about matters that are inherently uncertain. We believe that the critical accounting policies described below, among others, affect our more significant

45


estimates and judgments used in the preparation of our financial statements. For more information regarding our critical accounting policies, see “Note 2—Accounting Policies” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Principles of Consolidation
The Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly owned subsidiaries and the joint venture entities over which we exercise control. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation, and our net earnings are reduced by the portion of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests.
GAAP requires us to identify entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights and to determine which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). A VIE is broadly defined as an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; and (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. We consolidate our investment in a VIE when we determine that we are its primary beneficiary. We may change our original assessment of a VIE upon subsequent events such as the modification of contractual arrangements that affects the characteristics or adequacy of the entity’s equity investments at risk and the disposition of all or a portion of an interest held by the primary beneficiary.
We identify the primary beneficiary of a VIE as the enterprise that has both: (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance; and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the entity. We perform this analysis on an ongoing basis.
As it relates to investments in joint ventures, GAAP may preclude consolidation by the sole general partner in certain circumstances based on the type of rights held by the limited partner(s). We assess limited partners’ rights and their impact on the presumption of control of the limited partnership by the sole general partner when an investor becomes the sole general partner, and we perform a reassessment when there is a change to the terms or in the exercisability of the rights of the limited partners, the sole general partner increases or decreases its ownership of limited partnership interests, or there is an increase or decrease in the number of outstanding limited partnership interests. We also apply this guidance to managing member interests in limited liability companies.
Business Combinations
We account for acquisitions using the acquisition method and record the cost of the businesses acquired among tangible and recognized intangible assets and liabilities based upon their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. Recognized intangibles primarily include the value of in-place leases, acquired lease contracts, tenant and customer relationships, trade names/trademarks and goodwill. We do not amortize goodwill, which represents the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of the net assets of the acquired business and is included in other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Our method for recording the purchase price to acquired investments in real estate requires us to make subjective assessments for determining fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. This includes determining the value of the buildings, land and improvements, construction in progress, ground leases, tenant improvements, in-place leases, above and/or below market leases, purchase option intangible assets and/or liabilities, and any debt assumed. These estimates require significant judgment and in some cases involve complex calculations. These assessments directly impact our results of operations, as amounts estimated for certain assets and liabilities have different depreciation or amortization lives. In addition, we amortize the value assigned to above and/or below market leases as a component of revenue, unlike in-place leases and other intangibles, which we include in depreciation and amortization in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
We estimate the fair value of buildings acquired on an as-if-vacant basis, or replacement cost basis, and depreciate the building value over the estimated remaining life of the building, generally not to exceed 35 years. We determine the fair value of other fixed assets, such as site improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment, based upon the replacement cost and depreciate such value over the assets’ estimated remaining useful lives as determined at the applicable acquisition date. We determine the value of land either by considering the sales prices of similar properties in recent transactions or based on internal analysis of recently acquired and existing comparable properties within our portfolio. We generally determine the value of construction in progress based upon the replacement cost. However, for certain acquired properties that are part of a ground-up development, we determine fair value by using the same valuation approach as for all other properties and deducting the estimated cost to complete the development. During the remaining construction period, we capitalize interest expense until the

46


development has reached substantial completion. Construction in progress, including capitalized interest, is not depreciated until the development has reached substantial completion.
The fair value of acquired lease-related intangibles, if any, reflects: (i) the estimated value of any above and/or below market leases, determined by discounting the difference between the estimated market rent and in-place lease rent; and (ii) the estimated value of in-place leases related to the cost to obtain tenants, including leasing commissions, and an estimated value of the absorption period to reflect the value of the rent and recovery costs foregone during a reasonable lease-up period as if the acquired space was vacant. We amortize any acquired lease-related intangibles to revenue or amortization expense over the remaining life of the associated lease plus any assumed bargain renewal periods. If a lease is terminated prior to its stated expiration or not renewed upon expiration, we recognize all unamortized lease-related intangibles associated with that lease in operations at that time.
We estimate the fair value of purchase option intangible assets and liabilities by discounting the difference between the applicable property’s acquisition date fair value and an estimate of its future option price. We do not amortize the resulting intangible asset or liability over the term of the lease, but rather adjust the recognized value of the asset or liability upon sale.
We estimate the fair value of tenant or other customer relationships acquired, if any, by considering the nature and extent of existing business relationships with the tenant or customer, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant or customer, the tenant’s credit quality, expectations of lease renewals with the tenant, and the potential for significant, additional future leasing arrangements with the tenant, and we amortize that value over the expected life of the associated arrangements or leases, including the remaining terms of the related leases and any expected renewal periods. We estimate the fair value of trade names and trademarks using a royalty rate methodology and amortize that value over the estimated useful life of the trade name or trademark.
In connection with a business combination, we may assume rights and obligations under certain lease agreements pursuant to which we become the lessee of a given property. We assume the lease classification previously determined by the prior lessee absent a modification in the assumed lease agreement. We assess assumed operating leases, including ground leases, to determine whether the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable to us given current market conditions on the acquisition date. To the extent the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable relative to market conditions on the acquisition date, we recognize an intangible asset or liability, as applicable, at fair value and amortize that asset or liability (excluding purchase option intangibles) to interest or rental expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income over the applicable lease term. We include all lease-related intangible assets and liabilities within acquired lease intangibles and accounts payable and other liabilities, respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We determine the fair value of loans receivable acquired in connection with a business combination by discounting the estimated future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar loans on the same terms with the same length to maturity would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings. We do not establish a valuation allowance at the acquisition date because the estimated future cash flows already reflect our judgment regarding their uncertainty. We recognize the difference between the acquisition date fair value and the total expected cash flows as interest income using an effective interest method over the life of the applicable loan. Subsequent to the acquisition date, we evaluate changes regarding the uncertainty of future cash flows and the need for a valuation allowance, as appropriate.
We estimate the fair value of noncontrolling interests assumed consistent with the manner in which we value all of the underlying assets and liabilities.
We base the initial carrying value of investments in unconsolidated entities on the fair value of the assets at the time we acquired the joint venture interest. We estimate fair values for our equity method investments based on discounted cash flow models that include all estimated cash inflows and outflows over a specified holding period and, where applicable, any estimated debt premiums or discounts. The capitalization rates, discount rates and credit spreads we use in these models are based upon assumptions that we believe to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective investments.
We generally amortize any difference between our cost basis and the basis reflected at the joint venture level over the lives of the related assets and liabilities and include that amortization in our share of income or loss from unconsolidated entities. For earnings of equity method investments with pro rata distribution allocations, net income or loss is allocated between the partners in the joint venture based on their respective stated ownership percentages. In other instances, net income or loss is allocated between the partners in the joint venture based on the hypothetical liquidation at book value method.
We calculate the fair value of long-term debt by discounting the remaining contractual cash flows on each instrument at the current market rate for those borrowings, which we approximate based on the rate at which we would expect to incur a replacement instrument on the date of acquisition, and recognize any fair value adjustments related to long-term debt as effective yield adjustments over the remaining term of the instrument.

47


Impairment of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets
We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets, primarily consisting of investments in real estate, for impairment indicators. If indicators of impairment are present, we evaluate the carrying value of the related real estate investments in relation to the future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying operations. In performing this evaluation, we consider market conditions and our current intentions with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. We adjust the net book value of leased properties and other long-lived assets to fair value if the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows, including sales proceeds, is less than book value. We recognize an impairment loss at the time we make any such determination.
If impairment indicators arise with respect to intangible assets with finite useful lives, we evaluate impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If estimated future undiscounted net cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, then we estimate the fair value of the asset and compare the estimated fair value to the intangible asset’s carrying value. We recognize any shortfall from carrying value as an impairment loss in the current period.
We evaluate our investments in unconsolidated entities for impairment at least annually, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our investment may exceed its fair value. If we determine that a decline in the fair value of our investment in an unconsolidated entity is other-than-temporary, and if such reduced fair value is below the carrying value, we record an impairment.
We test goodwill for impairment at least annually, and more frequently if indicators arise. We first assess qualitative factors, such as current macroeconomic conditions, state of the equity and capital markets and our overall financial and operating performance, to determine the likelihood that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If we determine it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we proceed with the two-step approach to evaluating impairment. First, we estimate the fair value of the reporting unit and compare it to the reporting unit’s carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds fair value, we proceed with the second step, which requires us to assign the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if it had been acquired in a business combination at the date of the impairment test. The excess fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to the assets and liabilities is the implied value of goodwill and is used to determine the amount of impairment. We recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied value in the current period.
Estimates of fair value used in our evaluation of goodwill (if necessary based on our qualitative assessment), investments in real estate, investments in unconsolidated entities and intangible assets are based upon discounted future cash flow projections or other acceptable valuation techniques that are based, in turn, upon all available evidence including level three inputs, such as revenue and expense growth rates, estimates of future cash flows, capitalization rates, discount rates, general economic conditions and trends, or other available market data. Our ability to accurately predict future operating results and cash flows and to estimate and allocate fair values impacts the timing and recognition of impairments. While we believe our assumptions are reasonable, changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on our financial results.
Loans Receivable
We record loans receivable, other than those acquired in connection with a business combination, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets (either in secured loans receivable and investments, net or other assets, in the case of non-mortgage loans receivable) at the unpaid principal balance, net of any deferred origination fees, purchase discounts or premiums and valuation allowances. We amortize net deferred origination fees, which are comprised of loan fees collected from the borrower net of certain direct costs, and purchase discounts or premiums over the contractual life of the loan using the effective interest method and immediately recognize in income any unamortized balances if the loan is repaid before its contractual maturity.
We regularly evaluate the collectibility of loans receivable based on factors such as corporate and facility-level financial and operational reports, compliance with financial covenants set forth in the applicable loan agreement, the financial strength of the borrower and any guarantor, the payment history of the borrower and current economic conditions. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due under the terms of the applicable loan agreement, we provide a reserve against the portion of the receivable that we estimate may not be collected.
Fair Value
Fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement, and we determine fair value based on the assumptions that we expect market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within levels one and two of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within level three of the hierarchy).

48


Level one inputs utilize unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that we have the ability to access. Level two inputs consist of inputs other than quoted prices included in level one that are directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability. Level two inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and other inputs for the asset or liability that are observable at commonly quoted intervals, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates and yield curves. Level three inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which typically are based on our own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity. If the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the entire fair value measurement falls is the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. If the volume and level of market activity for an asset or liability has decreased significantly relative to the normal market activity for such asset or liability (or similar assets or liabilities), then transactions or quoted prices may not accurately reflect fair value. In addition, if there is evidence that a transaction for an asset or liability is not orderly, little, if any, weight is placed on that transaction price as an indicator of fair value. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
Revenue Recognition
Triple-Net Leased Properties and MOB Operations
Certain of our triple-net leases and most of our MOB leases provide for periodic and determinable increases in base rent. We recognize base rental revenues under these leases on a straight-line basis over the applicable lease term when collectibility is reasonably assured. Recognizing rental income on a straight-line basis generally results in recognized revenues during the first half of a lease term exceeding the cash amounts contractually due from our tenants, creating a straight-line rent receivable that is included in other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Certain of our leases provide for periodic increases in base rent only if certain revenue parameters or other substantive contingencies are met. We recognize the increased rental revenue under these leases as the related parameters or contingencies are met, rather than on a straight-line basis over the applicable lease term.
Senior Living Operations
We recognize resident fees and services, other than move-in fees, monthly as services are provided. We recognize move-in fees on a straight-line basis over the average resident stay. Our lease agreements with residents generally have terms of 12 to 18 months and are cancelable by the resident upon 30 days’ notice.
Other
We recognize interest income from loans and investments, including discounts and premiums, using the effective interest method when collectibility is reasonably assured. We apply the effective interest method on a loan-by-loan basis and recognize discounts and premiums as yield adjustments over the related loan term. We recognize interest income on an impaired loan to the extent our estimate of the fair value of the collateral is sufficient to support the balance of the loan, other receivables and all related accrued interest. When the balance of the loan, other receivables and all related accrued interest is equal to our estimate of the fair value of the collateral, we recognize interest income on a cash basis. We provide a reserve against an impaired loan to the extent our total investment in the loan exceeds our estimate of the fair value of the loan collateral.
We recognize income from rent, lease termination fees, development services, management advisory services, and all other income when all of the following criteria are met in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin 104: (i) the applicable agreement has been fully executed and delivered; (ii) services have been rendered; (iii) the amount is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured.
Allowances
We assess the collectibility of our rent receivables, including straight-line rent receivables. We base our assessment of the collectibility of rent receivables (other than straight-line rent receivables) on several factors, including, among other things, payment history, the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, the value of the underlying collateral, if any, and current economic conditions. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is probable that we will be unable to recover the full value of the receivable, we provide a reserve against the portion of the receivable that we estimate may not be recovered. We also base our assessment of the collectibility of straight-line rent receivables on several factors, including, among other things, the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, the historical operations and operating trends of the property, the historical payment pattern of the tenant and the type of property. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is probable that we will be unable to receive the rent payments due in the future, we provide a reserve against the recognized straight-line rent receivable asset for the portion, up to its full value, that we estimate may not be recovered. If we change our assumptions or

49


estimates regarding the collectibility of future rent payments required by a lease, we may adjust our reserve to increase or reduce the rental revenue recognized in the period we make such change in our assumptions or estimates.
Federal Income Tax
We have elected to be treated as a REIT under the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), for every year beginning with the year ended December 31, 1999. Accordingly, we generally are not subject to federal income tax on net income that we distribute to our stockholders, provided that we continue to qualify as a REIT. However, with respect to certain of our subsidiaries that have elected to be treated as “taxable REIT subsidiaries” (“TRSs”), we record income tax expense or benefit, as those entities are subject to federal income tax similar to regular corporations. Certain foreign subsidiaries are subject to foreign income tax, although they did not elect to be treated as TRSs.
We account for deferred income taxes using the asset and liability method and recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in our financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, we determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Any increase or decrease in the deferred tax liability that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes us to change our judgment about expected future tax consequences of events, is included in the tax provision when such changes occur. Deferred income taxes also reflect the impact of operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance is provided if we believe it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Any increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes us to change our judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset, is included in the tax provision when such changes occur.
We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We recognize interest and penalties, if applicable, related to uncertain tax positions as part of income tax benefit (expense).
Recently Issued or Adopted Accounting Standards
In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (“ASU 2015-03”), which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected. Also in August 2015, the FASB issues ASU 2015-15, Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated With Line-of-Credit Arrangements (“ASU 2015-15”) which clarifies the SEC staff’s position not objecting to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing such costs, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. We adopted ASU 2015-03 and 2015-15 for the quarter ended September 30, 2015. There were deferred financing costs of $69.1 million and $60.3 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively that are now classified within senior notes payable and other debt on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments (“ASU 2015-16”) to simplify the accounting for business combinations, specifically as it relates to measurement-period adjustments. Acquiring entities in a business combination must recognize measurement-period adjustments in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. Also, ASU 2015-16 requires entities to present separately on the face of the income statement (or disclose in the notes to the financial statements) the portion of the amount recorded in the current period earnings, by line item, that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. ASU 2015-16 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2016 and is to be applied prospectively to measurement-period adjustments that occur after the effective date. We do not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue From Contracts With Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which outlines a comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. ASU 2014-09 states that “an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.” While ASU 2014-09 specifically references contracts with customers, it may apply to certain other transactions such as the sale of real estate or equipment. In 2015, the FASB provided for a one-year deferral of the effective date for ASU 2014-09 which is now effective for us beginning January 1, 2018. We are continuing to evaluate this guidance; however, we do

50


not expect its adoption to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements, as a substantial portion of our revenue consists of rental income from leasing arrangements, which are specifically excluded from ASU 2014-09.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis (“ASU 2015-02”), which makes certain changes to both the variable interest model and the voting model, including changes to (1) the identification of variable interests (fees paid to a decision maker or service provider), (2) the variable interest entity characteristics for a limited partnership or similar entity and (3) the primary beneficiary determination. ASU 2015-02 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2016. We are continuing to evaluate this guidance; however, we do not expect its adoption to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Results of Operations
As of December 31, 2015, we operated through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and MOB operations. In our triple-net leased properties segment, we acquire and own seniors housing and healthcare properties throughout the United States and the United Kingdom and lease those properties to healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses. In our senior living operations segment, we invest in seniors housing communities throughout the United States and Canada and engage independent operators, such as Atria and Sunrise, to manage those communities. In our MOB operations segment, we primarily acquire, own, develop, lease, and manage MOBs. Information provided for “all other” includes income from loans and investments and other miscellaneous income and various corporate-level expenses not directly attributable to any of our three reportable business segments. Assets included in “all other” consist primarily of corporate assets, including cash, restricted cash, loans receivable and investments, and miscellaneous accounts receivable.
The historical results of operations of the CCP properties as well as the related assets and liabilities are presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying results of operations. Throughout this discussion, “continuing operations” does not include properties disposed of as part of the CCP Spin-Off.

51


Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
The table below shows our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 and the effect of changes in those results from period to period on our net income attributable to common stockholders.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease) to Net Income
 
2015
 
2014
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Triple-Net Leased Properties
$
784,234

 
$
679,112

 
$
105,122

 
15.5
 %
Senior Living Operations
601,840

 
516,395

 
85,445

 
16.5

MOB Operations
399,891

 
310,515

 
89,376

 
28.8

All Other
89,176

 
54,048

 
35,128

 
65.0

Total segment NOI
1,875,141

 
1,560,070

 
315,071

 
20.2

Interest and other income
1,052

 
4,263

 
(3,211
)
 
(75.3
)
Interest expense
(367,114
)
 
(292,065
)
 
(75,049
)
 
(25.7
)
Depreciation and amortization
(894,057
)
 
(725,216
)
 
(168,841
)
 
(23.3
)
General, administrative and professional fees
(128,035
)
 
(121,738
)
 
(6,297
)
 
(5.2
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
(14,411
)
 
(5,564
)
 
(8,847
)
 
(>100)

Merger-related expenses and deal costs
(102,944
)
 
(43,304
)
 
(59,640
)
 
(>100)

Other
(17,957
)
 
(25,743
)
 
7,786

 
30.2

Income before loss from unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations, real estate dispositions and noncontrolling interest
351,675

 
350,703

 
972

 
0.3

Loss from unconsolidated entities
(1,420
)
 
(139
)
 
(1,281
)
 
(>100)

Income tax benefit
39,284

 
8,732

 
30,552

 
>100

Income from continuing operations
389,539

 
359,296

 
30,243

 
8.4

Discontinued operations
11,103

 
99,735

 
(88,632
)
 
(88.9
)
Gain on real estate dispositions
18,580

 
17,970

 
610

 
3.4

Net income
419,222

 
477,001

 
(57,779
)
 
(12.1
)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
1,379

 
1,234

 
(145
)
 
(11.8
)
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
417,843

 
$
475,767

 
(57,924
)
 
(12.2
)
Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties
NOI for our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment equals the rental income and other services revenue earned from our triple-net assets. We incur no direct operating expenses for this segment.
The following table summarizes results of continuing operations in our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment:
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 
2015
 
2014
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
779,801

 
$
674,547

 
$
105,254

 
15.6
 %
Other services revenue
4,433

 
4,565

 
(132
)
 
(2.9
)
Segment NOI
$
784,234

 
$
679,112

 
105,122

 
15.5


52


Triple-net leased properties segment NOI increased in 2015 over the prior year primarily due to rent from the properties we acquired during 2015 and 2014, contractual escalations in rent pursuant to the terms of our leases, and increases in base and other rent under certain of our leases.
In our triple-net leased properties segment, our revenues generally consist of fixed rental amounts (subject to annual contractual escalations) received from our tenants in accordance with the applicable lease terms and do not vary based on the underlying operating performance of the properties. Therefore, while occupancy rates may affect the profitability of our tenants’ operations, they do not have a direct impact on our revenues or financial results. The following table sets forth average continuing occupancy rates related to the triple-net leased properties we owned at December 31, 2015 for the trailing 12 months ended September 30, 2015 (which is the most recent information available to us from our tenants) and average continuing occupancy rates related to the triple-net leased properties we owned at December 31, 2014 for the trailing 12 months ended September 30, 2014.
 
Number of Properties at December 31, 2015 (1)
 
Average Occupancy
for the Trailing 12 Months
Ended September 30,
2015 (1)
 
 
Number of Properties at December 31, 2014 (1)
 
Average Occupancy
for the Trailing 12 Months
Ended September 30,
2014 (1)
Seniors Housing Communities
453

 
88.2
%
 
 
448

 
88.3
%
Skilled Nursing Facilities
53

 
81.4

 
 
281

 
79.6

Specialty Hospitals
46

 
57.8

 
 
47

 
56.6

General Acute Care Hospitals
12

 
50.6

 
 

 

    
(1)
Excludes properties included in discontinued operations during 2015 and properties classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2015, non-stabilized properties, properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and certain properties for which we do not receive occupancy information. Also excludes properties acquired during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, including properties acquired as part of the 2015 AHS acquisition, and properties that transitioned operators for which we do not have eight full quarters of results subsequent to the transition.
The following table compares results of continuing operations for our 507 same-store triple-net leased properties. Throughout this discussion, “same-store” refers to properties that we owned for the full period in both comparison periods.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 
2015
 
2014
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
646,426

 
$
617,886

 
$
28,540

 
4.6
 %
Other services revenue
4,433

 
4,565

 
(132
)
 
(2.9
)
Segment NOI
$
650,859

 
$
622,451

 
28,408

 
4.6

Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations
The following table summarizes results of continuing operations in our senior living operations reportable business segment:
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 
2015
 
2014
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenues
$
1,811,255

 
$
1,552,951

 
$
258,304

 
16.6
 %
Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property-level operating expenses
(1,209,415
)
 
(1,036,556
)
 
(172,859
)
 
(16.7
)
Segment NOI
$
601,840

 
$
516,395

 
85,445

 
16.5


53


Revenues attributed to our senior living operations segment consist of resident fees and services, which include all amounts earned from residents at our seniors housing communities, such as rental fees related to resident leases, extended health care fees and other ancillary service income. Our senior living operations segment revenues increased in 2015 over the prior year primarily due to seniors housing communities we acquired during 2015 and 2014, including the 2015 HCT acquisition and the 2014 acquisition of 29 seniors housings communities located in Canada from Holiday Retirement (the “Holiday Canada Acquisition”).
Property-level operating expenses related to our senior living operations segment include labor, food, utilities, marketing, management and other costs of operating the properties. Property-level operating expenses also increased year over year primarily due to the acquired properties described above, increases in salaries, repairs & maintenance costs, real estate taxes and higher management fees primarily due to increased revenues, partially offset by decreased incentive fees and property insurance costs.
The following table compares results of continuing operations for our 236 same-store senior living operating communities.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 
2015
 
2014
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenues
$
1,523,421

 
$
1,485,146

 
$
38,275

 
2.6
 %
Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property-level operating expenses
(1,028,996
)
 
(998,166
)
 
(30,830
)
 
(3.1
)
Segment NOI
$
494,425

 
$
486,980

 
7,445

 
1.5

The following table sets forth average unit occupancy rates and the average monthly revenue per occupied room related to continuing operations in our senior living operations segment for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014:
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Average Unit
Occupancy
for the Year
Ended
December 31,
 
Average Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for the Year
Ended
December 31,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Total seniors housing communities
305

 
270

 
91.2
%
 
91.1
%
 
$
5,255

 
$
5,407

Same-store seniors housing communities
236

 
236

 
91.1

 
91.0

 
5,718

 
5,579


54


Segment NOI—MOB Operations
The following table summarizes results of continuing operations in our MOB operations reportable business segment:
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 
2015
 
2014
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—MOB Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
566,245

 
$
463,910

 
$
102,335

 
22.1
 %
Medical office building services revenue
34,436

 
22,529

 
11,907

 
52.9

Total revenues
600,681

 
486,439

 
114,242

 
23.5

Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property-level operating expenses
(174,225
)
 
(158,832
)
 
(15,393
)
 
(9.7
)
Medical office building services costs
(26,565
)
 
(17,092
)
 
(9,473
)
 
(55.4
)
Segment NOI
$
399,891

 
$
310,515

 
89,376

 
28.8

The increase in our MOB operations segment rental income in 2015 over the prior year is attributed primarily to the MOBs we acquired during 2015 and 2014 as well as same-store revenue growth and an increase in lease termination fees. The increase in our MOB property-level operating expenses is due primarily to those acquired MOBs and increases in cleaning, administrative wages and real estate tax expenses, partially offset by decreases in operating costs resulting from expense controls.
Medical office building services revenue and costs both increased in 2015 over the prior year primarily due to increased construction activity during 2015 compared to 2014. Management fee revenue also increased due to insourcing completed during 2014 and 2015.
The following table compares results of continuing operations for our 275 same-store MOBs.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 
2015
 
2014
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—MOB Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
450,463

 
$
447,437

 
$
3,026

 
0.7
%
Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property-level operating expenses
(152,533
)
 
(152,680
)
 
147

 
0.1

Segment NOI
$
297,930

 
$
294,757

 
3,173

 
1.1

The following table sets forth occupancy rates and the annualized average rent per occupied square foot related to continuing operations in our MOB operations segment at and for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014:
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Occupancy at
December 31,
 
Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Year Ended Ended December 31,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Total MOBs
361

 
277

 
91.7
%
 
90.2
%
 
$30
 
$30
Same-store MOBs
275

 
275

 
90.8

 
91.2

 
31
 
31
Segment NOI—All Other
All other NOI consists solely of income from loans and investments. Income from loans and investments increased in 2015 over the prior year due primarily to higher investment balances and prepayment income during 2015, partially offset by lower weighted average interest rates on loan balances in 2015 compared to 2014.

55


Interest Expense
The $49.0 million increase in total interest expense, including interest allocated to discontinued operations of $60.4 million and $86.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, is attributed primarily to $53.6 million of additional interest due to higher debt balances, partially offset by a $6.5 million reduction in interest due to lower effective interest rates, including the amortization of any fair value adjustments. Our effective interest rate was 3.6% for 2015, compared to 3.7% for 2014.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $168.8 million in 2015 primarily due to the real estate acquisitions we made in 2014 and 2015.
General, Administrative and Professional Fees
General, administrative and professional fees increased $6.3 million in 2015 primarily due to our increased employee head count as a result of organizational growth, partially offset by savings related to the CCP Spin-Off.
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt, Net
The loss on extinguishment of debt, net in 2015 and 2014 resulted primarily from various debt repayments we made to improve our credit profile. The 2015 repayments were made primarily with proceeds from the distribution paid to us at the time of the CCP Spin-Off.
Merger-Related Expenses and Deal Costs
Merger-related expenses and deal costs in both years consist of transition, integration, deal and severance-related expenses primarily related to pending and consummated transactions required by GAAP to be expensed rather than capitalized into the asset value. The $59.6 million increase in merger-related expenses and deal costs in 2015 over the prior year is primarily due to increased 2015 investment activity and costs related to CCP Spin-Off.
Other
Other primarily includes building rent expense paid to lease certain of our senior living operating communities, as well as certain unreimbursable expenses related to our triple-net leased portfolio and expenses related to the re-audit and re-review of our historical financial statements.
Income Tax Benefit
Income tax benefit for 2015 was due primarily to the income tax benefit of ordinary losses of certain taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS” or “TRS entities”). These losses were mainly attributable to the depreciation and amortization of fixed and intangible assets recorded as deferred tax liabilities in purchase accounting. Income tax benefit for 2014 was due primarily to the income tax benefit of ordinary losses and restructuring related to one of our TRS entities.
Discontinued Operations
Discontinued operations primarily relates to the operations of assets and liabilities disposed of as part of the CCP Spin-Off. The decrease in income from discontinued operations for 2015 compared to 2014 is primarily the result of $46.4 million of transaction and separation costs associated with the spin. Also, 2014 includes a full year of net income for the CCP operations whereas 2015 only includes net income through August 17, 2015, the date of the CCP Spin-Off.
Gain on Real Estate Dispositions
The gain on real estate dispositions in 2015 and 2014 primarily relates to the sale of 45 and ten properties, respectively.


56


Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
The table below shows our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 and the effect of changes in those results from period to period on our net income attributable to common stockholders.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease) to Net Income
 
2014
 
2013
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Triple-Net Leased Properties
$
679,112

 
$
590,485

 
$
88,627

 
15.0
 %
Senior Living Operations
516,395

 
449,321

 
67,074

 
14.9

MOB Operations
310,515

 
300,861

 
9,654

 
3.2

All Other
54,048

 
55,688

 
(1,640
)
 
(2.9
)
Total segment NOI
1,560,070

 
1,396,355

 
163,715

 
11.7

Interest and other income
4,263

 
2,022

 
2,241

 
>100

Interest expense
(292,065
)
 
(249,009
)
 
(43,056
)
 
(17.3
)
Depreciation and amortization
(725,216
)
 
(629,908
)
 
(95,308
)
 
(15.1
)
General, administrative and professional fees
(121,738
)
 
(115,083
)
 
(6,655
)
 
(5.8
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
(5,564
)
 
(1,201
)
 
(4,363
)
 
(>100)

Merger-related expenses and deal costs
(43,304
)
 
(21,634
)
 
(21,670
)
 
(>100)

Other
(25,743
)
 
(17,364
)
 
(8,379
)
 
(48.3
)
Income before loss from unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations, real estate dispositions and noncontrolling interest
350,703

 
364,178

 
(13,475
)
 
(3.7
)
Loss from unconsolidated entities
(139
)
 
(508
)
 
369

 
72.6

Income tax benefit
8,732

 
11,828

 
(3,096
)
 
(26.2
)
Income from continuing operations
359,296

 
375,498

 
(16,202
)
 
(4.3
)
Discontinued operations
99,735

 
79,171

 
20,564

 
26.0

Gain on real estate dispositions
17,970

 

 
17,970

 
nm

Net income
477,001

 
454,669

 
22,332

 
4.9

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
1,234

 
1,160

 
(74
)
 
(6.4
)
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
475,767

 
$
453,509

 
22,258

 
4.9

    
nm—not meaningful 
Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties
The following table summarizes results of continuing operations in our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment:
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase to Segment NOI
 
2014
 
2013
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
674,547

 
$
586,016

 
$
88,531

 
15.1
%
Other services revenue
4,565

 
4,469

 
96

 
2.1

Segment NOI
$
679,112

 
$
590,485

 
88,627

 
15.0

Triple-net leased properties segment NOI increased in 2014 over the prior year primarily due to rent from the properties we acquired during 2014 and 2013, contractual escalations in rent pursuant to the terms of our leases, and increases in base and other rent under certain of our leases.

57


The following table compares results of continuing operations for our 477 same-store triple-net leased properties.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 
2014
 
2013
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
546,301

 
$
524,676

 
$
21,625

 
4.1
%
Other services revenue
4,565

 
4,469

 
96

 
2.1

Segment NOI
$
550,866

 
$
529,145

 
21,721

 
4.1

Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations
The following table summarizes results of continuing operations in our senior living operations reportable business segment:
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 
2014
 
2013
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenues
$
1,552,951

 
$
1,406,005

 
$
146,946

 
10.5
 %
Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property-level operating expenses
(1,036,556
)
 
(956,684
)
 
(79,872
)
 
(8.3
)
Segment NOI
$
516,395

 
$
449,321

 
67,074

 
14.9

Our senior living operations segment revenues increased in 2014 over the prior year primarily due to the Holiday Canada Acquisition and other seniors housing communities we acquired during 2014 and 2013.
Property-level operating expenses also increased year over year primarily due to the acquired properties described above.
The following table compares results of continuing operations for our 219 same-store senior living operating communities.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 
2014
 
2013
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenues
$
1,384,878

 
$
1,357,088

 
$
27,790

 
2.0
 %
Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property-level operating expenses
(937,671
)
 
(925,478
)
 
(12,193
)
 
(1.3
)
Segment NOI
$
447,207

 
$
431,610

 
15,597

 
3.6

The following table sets forth average unit occupancy rates and the average monthly revenue per occupied room related to continuing operations in our senior living operations segment for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Average Unit
Occupancy for
the Year
Ended
December 31,
 
Average
Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Year
Ended
December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Total seniors housing communities
270

 
239

 
91.1
%
 
91.1
%
 
$5,407
 
$5,470
Same-store seniors housing communities
219

 
219

 
91.1

 
91.2

 
5,673
 
5,553

58


Segment NOI—MOB Operations
The following table summarizes results of continuing operations in our MOB operations reportable business segment:
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 
2014
 
2013
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—MOB Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
463,910

 
$
450,340

 
$
13,570

 
3.0
 %
Medical office building services revenue
22,529

 
12,077

 
10,452

 
86.5

Total revenues
486,439

 
462,417

 
24,022

 
5.2

Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property-level operating expenses
(158,832
)
 
(153,241
)
 
(5,591
)
 
(3.6
)
Medical office building services costs
(17,092
)
 
(8,315
)
 
(8,777
)
 
(105.6
)
Segment NOI
$
310,515

 
$
300,861

 
9,654

 
3.2

The increase in our MOB operations segment rental income in 2014 over the prior year is attributed primarily to the MOBs we acquired during 2014 and 2013 and slightly higher base rents. The increase in our MOB property-level operating expenses is due primarily to those acquired MOBs and increases in utilities, snow removal, payroll and insurance expenses, partially offset by decreases in operating costs resulting from expense controls.
Medical office building services revenue and costs both increased in 2014 over the prior year primarily due to increased construction activity during 2014 compared to 2013.
The following table compares results of continuing operations for our 297 same-store MOBs.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease)
to Segment NOI
 
2014
 
2013
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—MOB Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
440,755

 
$
435,786

 
$
4,969

 
1.1
 %
Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property-level operating expenses
(150,585
)
 
(147,987
)
 
(2,598
)
 
(1.8
)
Segment NOI
$
290,170

 
$
287,799

 
2,371

 
0.8

The following table sets forth occupancy rates and the annualized average rent per occupied square foot related to continuing operations in our MOB operations segment at and for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Occupancy at
December 31,
 
Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Year Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Total MOBs
311

 
309

 
89.8
%
 
90.1
%
 
$31
 
$29
Same-store MOBs
297

 
297

 
89.8

 
90.0

 
30
 
29
Segment NOI—All Other
All other NOI consists solely of income from loans and investments. Income from loans and investments decreased in 2014 over the prior year due primarily to final repayments and sales of portions of certain loans receivable throughout 2013.
Interest Expense
The $38.2 million increase in total interest expense, including interest allocated to discontinued operations of $86.5 million and $91.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, is attributed primarily to $50.9

59


million of additional interest due to higher debt balances, partially offset by a $15.6 million reduction in interest due to lower effective interest rates, including the amortization of any fair value adjustments. Our effective interest rate was 3.7% for 2014, compared to 3.8% for 2013.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $95.3 million in 2014 primarily due to real estate acquisitions we made in 2013 and 2014.
General, Administrative and Professional Fees
General, administrative and professional fees increased $6.7 million in 2014 primarily due to our continued organizational growth.
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt, Net
The loss on extinguishment of debt, net in 2014 resulted primarily from various debt repayments. The loss on extinguishment of debt, net in 2013 resulted primarily from the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees as a result of replacing our previous $2.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility with a new $3.0 billion unsecured credit facility and the repayment of certain mortgage debt.
Merger-Related Expenses and Deal Costs
Merger-related expenses and deal costs in both years consist of transition, integration, deal and severance-related expenses primarily related to pending and consummated transactions required by GAAP to be expensed rather than capitalized into the asset value. The $21.7 million increase in merger-related expenses and deal costs in 2014 over the prior year is primarily due to increased 2014 investment activity.
Other
Other primarily includes building rent expense paid to lease certain of our senior living operating communities, as well as certain unreimbursable expenses related to our triple-net leased portfolio. For the year ended December 31, 2014, other also includes expenses related to the re-audit and re-review of our historical financial statements.
Income Tax Benefit
Income tax benefit for 2014 was due primarily to the income tax benefit of ordinary losses and restructuring related to one of our TRS entities. Income tax benefit for 2013 was due primarily to the release of valuation allowances against certain deferred tax assets related to one of our TRS entities.
Discontinued Operations
Discontinued operations primarily relates to the operations of assets and liabilities disposed of as part of the CCP Spin-Off, and impairments of $1.5 million and $39.7 million recorded in 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Gain on Real Estate Dispositions
The gain on real estate dispositions in 2014 resulted primarily from the sale of ten properties that are not classified as discontinued operations in accordance with ASU 2014-08, resulting in a net gain of $18.0 million. Gains on real estate dispositions in 2013 are classified in discontinued operations.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We believe that net income, as defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measurement. However, we consider certain non-GAAP financial measures to be useful supplemental measures of our operating performance. A non-GAAP financial measure is a measure of historical or future financial performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes or includes amounts that are not so excluded from or included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. Described below are the non-GAAP financial measures used by management to evaluate our operating performance and that we consider most useful to investors, together with reconciliations of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.
The non-GAAP financial measures we present in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may not be comparable to those presented by other real estate companies due to the fact that not all real estate companies use the same definitions. You should not consider these measures as alternatives to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as indicators of our financial performance or as alternatives to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as measures of

60


our liquidity, nor are these measures necessarily indicative of sufficient cash flow to fund all of our needs. In order to facilitate a clear understanding of our consolidated historical operating results, you should examine these measures in conjunction with net income as presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements and other financial data included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Funds From Operations and Normalized Funds From Operations
Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. However, since real estate values historically have risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors deem presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. For that reason, we consider Funds From Operations (“FFO”) and normalized FFO to be appropriate measures of operating performance of an equity REIT. In particular, we believe that normalized FFO is useful because it allows investors, analysts and our management to compare our operating performance to the operating performance of other real estate companies and between periods on a consistent basis without having to account for differences caused by unanticipated items and other events such as transactions and litigation. In some cases, we provide information about identified non-cash components of FFO and normalized FFO because it allows investors, analysts and our management to assess the impact of those items on our financial results.
We use the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) definition of FFO. NAREIT defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of real estate property, including gain on re-measurement of equity method investments, and impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate, plus real estate depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. We define normalized FFO as FFO excluding the following income and expense items (which may be recurring in nature): (a) merger-related costs and expenses, including amortization of intangibles, transition and integration expenses, and deal costs and expenses, including expenses and recoveries relating to our acquisition lawsuits; (b) the impact of any expenses related to asset impairment and valuation allowances, the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees, or additional costs, expenses, discounts, make-whole payments, penalties or premiums incurred as a result of early retirement or payment of our debt; (c) the non-cash effect of income tax benefits or expenses and derivative transactions that have non-cash mark-to-market impacts on our Consolidated Statements of Income; (d) the impact of future acquisitions, divestitures (including pursuant to tenant options to purchase) and capital transactions; (e) the financial impact of contingent consideration, severance-related costs, charitable donations made to the Ventas Charitable Foundation, gains and losses for non-operational foreign currency hedge agreements and changes in the fair value of financial instruments; and (f) expenses related to the re-audit and re-review in 2014 of our historical financial statements and related matters.

61


The following table summarizes our FFO and normalized FFO for each of the five years ended December 31, 2015. Our normalized FFO for the year ended December 31, 2015 increased over the prior year due primarily to accretive acquisitions and increases in property NOI, partially offset by increased interest expense and a partial year’s results from the properties that were transferred to CCP on August 17, 2015 in connection with the CCP Spin-Off.
 
For the Year Ended December 31,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
(In thousands)
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
417,843

 
$
475,767

 
$
453,509

 
$
362,800

 
$
364,493

Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate depreciation and amortization
887,126

 
718,649

 
624,245

 
616,095

 
390,995

Real estate depreciation related to noncontrolling interest
(7,906
)
 
(10,314
)
 
(10,512
)
 
(8,503
)
 
(3,471
)
Real estate depreciation related to unconsolidated entities
7,353

 
5,792

 
6,543

 
7,516

 
6,552

Loss (gain) on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, net
176

 

 
(1,241
)
 
(16,645
)
 

Gain on real estate dispositions
(18,580
)
 
(17,970
)
 

 

 

Discontinued operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gain on real estate dispositions
(212
)
 
(1,494
)
 
(4,059
)
 
(80,952
)
 

Depreciation on real estate assets
79,608

 
103,250

 
139,973

 
144,256

 
66,282

FFO
1,365,408

 
1,273,680

 
1,208,458

 
1,024,567

 
824,851

Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Litigation proceeds, net

 

 

 

 
(202,259
)
Change in fair value of financial instruments
460

 
5,121

 
449

 
99

 
2,959

Income tax benefit
(42,384
)
 
(9,431
)
 
(11,828
)
 
(6,286
)
 
(31,137
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
15,797

 
5,013

 
1,048

 
37,640

 
27,604

Merger-related expenses, deal costs and re-audit costs
152,344

 
54,389

 
21,560

 
63,183

 
153,923

Amortization of other intangibles
2,058

 
1,246

 
1,022

 
1,022

 
1,022

Normalized FFO
$
1,493,683

 
$
1,330,018

 
$
1,220,709

 
$
1,120,225

 
$
776,963

    

62


Adjusted EBITDA
We consider Adjusted EBITDA an important supplemental measure to net income because it provides another manner in which to evaluate our operating performance and serves as another indicator of our ability to service debt. We define Adjusted EBITDA as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (including non-cash stock-based compensation expense), excluding gains or losses on extinguishment of debt, merger-related expenses and deal costs, expenses related to the re-audit and re-review of our historical financial statements, net gains on real estate activity and changes in the fair value of financial instruments (including amounts in discontinued operations). The following table sets forth a reconciliation of our net income attributable to common stockholders to Adjusted EBITDA (including amounts in discontinued operations) for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013:
 
For the Year Ended December 31,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
417,843

 
$
475,767

 
$
453,509

Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
Interest
427,542

 
378,556

 
340,381

Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
14,411

 
5,564

 
1,048

Taxes (including amounts in general, administrative and professional fees)
(37,112
)
 
(4,770
)
 
(7,166
)
Depreciation and amortization
973,665

 
828,466

 
769,881

Non-cash stock-based compensation expense
19,537

 
20,994

 
20,653

Merger-related expenses, deal costs and re-audit costs
150,290

 
53,847

 
21,634

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
1,499

 
1,419

 
1,380

Gain on real estate dispositions
(18,811
)
 
(19,183
)
 
(3,617
)
Changes in fair value of financial instruments
460

 
5,121

 
449

Gain on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, net
176

 

 
(1,241
)
Adjusted EBITDA
$
1,949,500

 
$
1,745,781

 
$
1,596,911

    

63


NOI
We also consider NOI an important supplemental measure to net income because it allows investors, analysts and our management to assess our unlevered property-level operating results and to compare our operating results with the operating results of other real estate companies and between periods on a consistent basis. We define NOI as total revenues, less interest and other income, property-level operating expenses and medical office building services costs (including amounts in discontinued operations). Cash receipts may differ due to straight-line recognition of certain rental income and the application of other GAAP policies. The following table sets forth a reconciliation of NOI to net income attributable to common stockholders (including amounts in discontinued operations) for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013:
 
For the Year Ended December 31,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
417,843

 
$
475,767

 
$
453,509

Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
Interest and other income
(1,115
)
 
(5,017
)
 
(2,047
)
Interest
427,542

 
378,556

 
340,381

Depreciation and amortization
973,665

 
828,466

 
769,881

General, administrative and professional fees
128,044

 
121,746

 
115,109

Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
14,411

 
5,564

 
1,048

Merger-related expenses and deal costs
149,346

 
45,051

 
21,634

Other
19,577

 
39,337

 
18,325

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
1,499

 
1,419

 
1,380

Loss from unconsolidated entities
1,420

 
139

 
508

Income tax benefit
(39,284
)
 
(8,732
)
 
(11,828
)
Gain on real estate dispositions
(18,811
)
 
(19,183
)
 
(3,617
)
NOI
2,074,137

 
1,863,113

 
1,704,283

Discontinued operations
(198,996
)
 
(303,043
)
 
(307,928
)
NOI (excluding amounts in discontinued operations)
$
1,875,141

 
$
1,560,070

 
$
1,396,355

Asset/Liability Management
Asset/liability management, a key element of enterprise risk management, is designed to support the achievement of our business strategy, while ensuring that we maintain appropriate and tolerable levels of market risk (primarily interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange risk) and credit risk. Effective management of these risks is a contributing factor to the absolute levels and variability of our FFO and net worth. The following discussion addresses our integrated management of assets and liabilities, including the use of derivative financial instruments.
Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates with respect to borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility and our unsecured term loans, certain of our mortgage loans that are floating rate obligations, mortgage loans receivable that bear interest at floating rates and marketable debt securities. These market risks result primarily from changes in LIBOR rates or prime rates. To manage these risks, we continuously monitor our level of floating rate debt with respect to total debt and other factors, including our assessment of current and future economic conditions.

64


The table below sets forth certain information with respect to our debt, excluding premiums and discounts.
 
As of December 31,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance:
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed rate:
 
 
 
 
 
Senior notes and other
$
7,534,459

 
$
6,677,875

 
$
5,418,543

Mortgage loans and other (1)
1,554,062

 
1,810,716

 
2,155,155

Variable rate:
 
 
 
 
 
Unsecured revolving credit facilities
180,683

 
919,099

 
376,343

Unsecured term loans
1,568,477

 
990,634

 
1,000,702

Mortgage loans and other
433,339

 
474,047

 
369,734

Total
$
11,271,020

 
$
10,872,371

 
$
9,320,477

Percent of total debt:
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed rate:
 
 
 
 
 
Senior notes and other
66.9
%
 
61.4
%
 
58.1
%
Mortgage loans and other (1)
13.8

 
16.6

 
23.1

Variable rate:
 
 
 
 
 
Unsecured revolving credit facilities
1.6

 
8.5

 
4.0

Unsecured term loans
13.9

 
9.1

 
10.7

Mortgage loans and other
3.8

 
4.4

 
4.1

Total
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
Weighted average interest rate at end of period:
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed rate:
 
 
 
 
 
Senior notes and other
3.5
%
 
3.5
%
 
3.7
%
Mortgage loans and other (1)
5.7

 
5.9

 
6.0

Variable rate:
 
 
 
 
 
Unsecured revolving credit facilities
1.4

 
1.4

 
1.2

Unsecured term loans
1.4

 
1.3

 
1.3

Mortgage loans and other
2.0

 
2.3

 
1.7

Total
3.5

 
3.5

 
3.8

    
(1)
Excludes mortgage debt of $22.9 million, $27.6 million and $13.1 million related to real estate assets classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. All amounts were included in liabilities related to assets held for sale on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The variable rate debt in the table above reflects, in part, the effect of $150.5 million notional amount of interest rate swaps with a maturity of March 21, 2018 that effectively convert fixed rate debt to variable rate debt. In addition, the fixed rate debt in the table above reflects, in part, the effect of $48.1 million notional amount of interest rate swaps with maturities ranging from October 1, 2016 to April 1, 2019, in each case that effectively convert variable rate debt to fixed rate debt.
In February 2016, we entered into a $200 million notional amount interest rate swap with a maturity of August 3, 2020 that effectively converts LIBOR-based floating rate debt to fixed rate debt, setting LIBOR at 1.132% through the maturity date of the swap. The maturity date of the Ardent Term Loan is also August 3, 2020.
The decrease in our outstanding variable rate debt at December 31, 2015 compared to December 31, 2014 is primarily attributable to the repayment of borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility and our unsecured term loan due 2019, partially offset by borrowings under our unsecured term loan due 2020.
Pursuant to the terms of certain leases with one of our tenants, if interest rates increase on certain variable rate debt that we have totaling $80.0 million as of December 31, 2015, our tenant is required to pay us additional rent (on a dollar-for-dollar

65


basis) in an amount equal to the increase in interest expense resulting from the increased interest rates. Therefore, the increase in interest expense related to this debt is equally offset by an increase in additional rent due to us from the tenant. Assuming a 100 basis point increase in the weighted average interest rate related to our variable rate debt and assuming no change in our variable rate debt outstanding as of December 31, 2015, interest expense for 2016 would increase by approximately $21.9 million, or $0.07 per diluted common share.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, our joint venture and operating partners’ aggregate share of total debt was $132.6 million and $141.4 million, respectively, with respect to certain properties we owned through consolidated joint ventures and an operating partnership. Total debt does not include our portion of debt related to investments in unconsolidated entities, which was $90.1 million and $97.5 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The fair value of our fixed and variable rate debt is based on current interest rates at which we could obtain similar borrowings. For fixed rate debt, interest rate fluctuations generally affect the fair value, but not our earnings or cash flows. Therefore, interest rate risk does not have a significant impact on our fixed rate debt obligations until their maturity or earlier prepayment and refinancing. If interest rates have risen at the time we seek to refinance our fixed rate debt, whether at maturity or otherwise, our future earnings and cash flows could be adversely affected by additional borrowing costs. Conversely, lower interest rates at the time of refinancing may reduce our overall borrowing costs.
To highlight the sensitivity of our fixed rate debt to changes in interest rates, the following summary shows the effects of a hypothetical instantaneous change of 100 basis points in interest rates as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:
 
As of December 31,
 
2015
 
2014
 
(In thousands)
Gross book value
$
9,088,521

 
$
8,488,591

Fair value (1)
9,170,508

 
8,817,982

Fair value reflecting change in interest rates (1):
 
 
 
-100 basis points
9,674,423

 
9,256,492

+100 basis points
8,708,963

 
8,406,735

    
(1)
The change in fair value of our fixed rate debt from December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2015 was due primarily to 2015 senior note issuances, net of repayments, and mortgage loan repayments.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the fair value of our secured and non-mortgage loans receivable, based on our estimates of currently prevailing rates for comparable loans, was $855.7 million and $767.9 million, respectively. See “Note 6—Loans Receivable and Investments” and “Note 11—Fair Values of Financial Instruments” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
As a result of our Canadian and United Kingdom operations, we are subject to fluctuations in certain foreign currency exchange rates that may, from time to time, affect our financial condition and operating performance. Based solely on our results for the year ended December 31, 2015 (including the impact of existing hedging arrangements), if the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the British pound and Canadian dollar were to increase or decrease by one standard deviation compared to the average exchange rate during the year, our normalized FFO per share for the year ended December 31, 2015 would decrease or increase, as applicable, by approximately $0.01 per share or less than 1%. We will continue to mitigate these risks through a layered approach to hedging looking out for the next year and continual assessment of our foreign operational capital structure. Nevertheless, we cannot assure you that any such fluctuations will not have an effect on our earnings.





66


Concentration and Credit Risk
We use concentration ratios to identify, understand and evaluate the potential impact of economic downturns and other adverse events that may affect our asset types, geographic locations, business models, and tenants, operators and managers. We evaluate concentration risk in terms of investment mix and operations mix. Investment mix measures the percentage of our investments that is concentrated in a specific asset type or that is operated or managed by a particular tenant, operator or manager. Operations mix measures the percentage of our operating results that is attributed to a particular tenant, operator or manager, geographic location or business model. The following tables reflect our concentration risk as of the dates and for the periods presented:
 
As of
December 31,
 
2015
 
2014
Investment mix by asset type (1):
 
 
 
Seniors housing communities
65.2
%
 
73.4
%
MOBs
21.7

 
18.1

Skilled nursing facilities
1.6

 
2.1

Specialty hospitals
2.1

 
1.8

General acute care hospitals
5.9

 
0.8

Secured loans receivable and investments, net
3.5

 
3.8

Investment mix by tenant, operator and manager (1):
 
 
 
Atria
22.5
%
 
26.8
%
Sunrise
11.7

 
13.9

Brookdale Senior Living
8.5

 
11.5

Kindred
2.1

 
2.3

All other
55.2

 
45.5

    
(1)
Ratios are based on the gross book value of real estate investments (excluding assets classified as held for sale) as of each reporting date.

67


 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
Operations mix by tenant and operator and business model:
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues (1):
 
 
 
 
 
Senior living operations
55.1
%
 
56.0
%
 
56.1
%
Kindred
5.6

 
5.9

 
6.2

Brookdale Senior Living (2)
5.3

 
6.1

 
6.2

All others
34.0

 
32.0

 
31.5

Adjusted EBITDA (3):
 
 
 
 
 
Senior living operations
29.8
%
 
28.4
%
 
26.0
%
Kindred
8.8

 
10.1

 
16.1

Brookdale Senior Living (2)
8.2

 
9.2

 
10.9

All others
53.2

 
52.3

 
47.0

NOI (4):
 
 
 
 
 
Senior living operations
32.1
%
 
33.1
%
 
32.2
%
Kindred
9.8

 
10.6

 
11.2

Brookdale Senior Living (2)
9.3

 
10.9

 
11.2

All others
48.8

 
45.4

 
45.4

Operations mix by geographic location (5):
 
 
 
 
 
California
15.4
%
 
15.4
%
 
15.4
%
New York
8.8

 
8.8

 
8.8

Texas
6.1

 
6.1

 
6.1

Illinois
4.9

 
4.9

 
4.9

Florida
4.6

 
4.6

 
4.6

All others
60.2

 
60.2

 
60.2


(1)
Total revenues include medical office building and other services revenue, revenue from loans and investments and interest and other income (excluding amounts in discontinued operations).
(2)
Excludes one seniors housing community included in senior living operations.
(3)
Includes amounts in discontinued operations.
(4)
Excludes amounts in discontinued operations.
(5)
Ratios are based on total revenues (excluding amounts in discontinued operations) for each period presented.
See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional disclosure and reconciliations of net income attributable to common stockholders to Adjusted EBITDA and NOI as computed in accordance with GAAP.
We derive a significant portion of our revenues by leasing assets under long-term triple-net leases in which the rental rate is generally fixed with annual escalators, subject to certain limitations. Some of our triple-net lease escalators are contingent upon the satisfaction of specified facility revenue parameters or based on increases in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), with caps, floors or collars. We also earn revenues directly from individual residents in our seniors housing communities that are managed by independent operators, such as Atria and Sunrise, and tenants in our MOBs. For the year ended December 31, 2015, 29.8% of our Adjusted EBITDA (including amounts in discontinued operations) was derived from our senior living operations and MOB operations, for which rental rates may fluctuate more frequently upon lease rollovers and renewals due to shorter term leases and changing economic or market conditions.
The concentration of our triple-net leased properties segment revenues and operating income that are attributed to Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred and Ardent creates credit risk. If either Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred or Ardent becomes unable or unwilling to satisfy its obligations to us or to renew its leases with us upon expiration of the terms thereof, our financial condition and results of operations could decline and our ability to service our indebtedness and to make distributions

68


to our stockholders could be limited. We cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred and Ardent will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable them to satisfy their respective obligations to us, and any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred or Ardent to do so could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. In addition, any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred or Ardent to effectively conduct its operations or to maintain and improve our properties could adversely affect its business reputation and its ability to attract and retain patients and residents in our properties, which could have an indirect Material Adverse Effect on us. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Our leases with Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred and Ardent account for a significant portion of our triple-net leased properties segment revenues and operating income; Any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred or Ardent to satisfy its obligations under our agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and “Note 3Concentration of Credit Risk” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We regularly monitor and assess any changes in the relative credit risk of our significant tenants, and in particular those tenants that have recourse obligations under our triple-net leases. The ratios and metrics we use to evaluate a significant tenant’s liquidity and creditworthiness depend on facts and circumstances specific to that tenant and the industry or industries in which it operates, including without limitation the tenant’s credit history and economic conditions related to the tenant, its operations and the markets in which the tenant operates, that may vary over time. Among other things, we may (i) review and analyze information regarding the real estate, seniors housing and healthcare industries generally, publicly available information regarding the significant tenant, and information required to be provided by the tenant under the terms of its lease agreements with us, (ii) examine monthly and/or quarterly financial statements of the significant tenant to the extent publicly available or otherwise provided under the terms of our lease agreements, and (iii) participate in periodic discussions and in-person meetings with representatives of the significant tenant.  Using this information, we calculate multiple financial ratios (which may, but do not necessarily, include net debt to EBITDAR or EBITDARM, fixed charge coverage and tangible net worth), after making certain adjustments based on our judgment, and assess other metrics we deem relevant to an understanding of the significant tenant’s credit risk.
Because Atria and Sunrise manage our properties in exchange for the receipt of a management fee from us, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants. However, we rely on our managers’ personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations efficiently and effectively. We also rely on our managers to set appropriate resident fees and to otherwise operate our seniors housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, including various rights to terminate and exercise remedies under the agreements as provided therein, Atria’s or Sunrise’s failure, inability or unwillingness to satisfy its respective obligations under those agreements, to efficiently and effectively manage our properties or to provide timely and accurate accounting information with respect thereto could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. In addition, significant changes in Atria’s or Sunrise’s senior management or equity ownership or any adverse developments in their businesses and affairs or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—The properties managed by Atria and Sunrise account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; Adverse developments in Atria’s or Sunrise’s business and affairs or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” and “—We have rights to terminate our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise in whole or with respect to specific properties under certain circumstances, and we may be unable to replace Atria or Sunrise if our management agreements are terminated or not renewed” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In December 2012, we acquired a 34% ownership interest in Atria, which entitles us to certain rights and minority protections as well as the right to appoint two of five members on the Atria board of directors.
Triple-Net Lease Expirations
If our tenants are not able or willing to renew our triple-net leases upon expiration, we may be unable to reposition the applicable properties on a timely basis or on the same or better economic terms, if at all. Although our lease expirations are staggered, the non-renewal of some or all of our triple-net leases that expire in any given year could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we had no triple-net lease renewals or expirations without renewal that, in the aggregate, had a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations for that period. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—If we must replace any of our tenants or operators, we might be unable to reposition the properties on as favorable terms, or at all, and we could be subject to delays, limitations and expenses, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” included in Part I, Item IA of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

69


The following table summarizes our triple-net lease expirations currently scheduled to occur over the next ten years (excluding leases related to assets classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2015):
 
Number of
Properties
 
2015 Annual
Rental Income
 
% of 2015 Total
Triple-Net Leased Properties Segment Rental
Income
 
(Dollars in thousands)
2016
1

 
$
895

 
0.1
%
2017
23

 
16,944

 
2.2

2018
19

 
51,879

 
6.7

2019
73

 
117,849

 
15.1

2020
64

 
61,243

 
7.9

2021
73

 
65,508

 
8.4

2022
15

 
8,899

 
1.1

2023
14

 
29,264

 
3.8

2024
35

 
22,059

 
2.8

2025
70

 
110,608

 
14.2

In December 2014, we entered into favorable agreements with Kindred to transition or sell the operations of nine licensed healthcare assets, make modifications to the master leases governing 34 leased assets, and reimburse us for certain deferred capital expenditures at skilled nursing facilities previously transferred to new operators. In January 2015, Kindred paid us $37 million in connection with these agreements, which is being amortized over the remaining lease term for the 34 assets governed by the modified master leases. We own or have the rights to all licenses and CONs at the nine properties to be transitioned or sold, and Kindred has extensive and detailed obligations to cooperate and ensure an orderly transition of the properties to another operator. As of December 31, 2015, four of the nine properties have been sold and three of the nine properties were disposed of as part of the CCP Spin-Off.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2015, we had a total of $53.0 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, operating cash and cash related to our senior living operations and MOB operations reportable business segments that is deposited and held in property-level accounts. Funds maintained in the property-level accounts are used primarily for the payment of property-level expenses, debt service payments and certain capital expenditures. As of December 31, 2015, we also had escrow deposits and restricted cash of $77.9 million and $1.8 billion of unused borrowing capacity available under our unsecured revolving credit facility.
During 2015, our principal sources of liquidity were cash flows from operations, borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility and CAD unsecured term loan, proceeds from the issuance of debt and equity securities, proceeds from asset sales and cash on hand.
For the next 12 months, our principal liquidity needs are to: (i) fund operating expenses; (ii) meet our debt service requirements; (iii) repay maturing mortgage and other debt, including $550.0 million of senior notes; (iv) fund capital expenditures; (v) fund acquisitions, investments and commitments, including development and redevelopment activities; and (vi) make distributions to our stockholders and unitholders, as required for us to continue to qualify as a REIT. In addition, we may elect to prepay outstanding indebtedness prior to maturity based on our analysis of various factors. We expect that these liquidity needs generally will be satisfied by a combination of the following: cash flows from operations, cash on hand, debt assumptions and financings (including secured financings), issuances of debt and equity securities, dispositions of assets (in whole or in part through joint venture arrangements with third parties) and borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility. However, an inability to access liquidity through multiple capital sources concurrently could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Capital Structure—Limitations on our ability to access capital could have an adverse effect on our ability to make required payments on our debt obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In January 2015, we funded the HCT Acquisition through the issuance of approximately 28.4 million shares of our common stock and 1.1 million limited partnership units that are redeemable for shares of our common stock, the payment of

70


approximately $11 million in cash (excluding cash in lieu of fractional shares) and the assumption or repayment of debt, net of HCT cash on hand.  
Beginning on January 16, 2016 and as of February 10, 2016, third party investors executed redemption right exercise notices for Ventas Realty Capital Healthcare Trust Operating Partnership, L.P. to redeem 303,136 Class C Units. We expect that the Class C Units will be redeemed through the issuance of 303,136 shares of Ventas common stock on or before April 1, 2016, but we have the right to redeem the Class C Units for a cash amount.
Unsecured Credit Facility and Unsecured Term Loans
Our unsecured credit facility is comprised of a $2.0 billion revolving credit facility priced at LIBOR plus 1.0% as of December 31, 2015, and a $200.0 million fully funded term loan and an $800.0 million term loan (with $468.5 million outstanding), each priced at LIBOR plus 1.05% as of December 31, 2015. The revolving credit facility matures in January 2018, but may be extended, at our option subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, for an additional period of one year. The $200.0 million and $800.0 million term loans mature in January 2018 and January 2019, respectively. The unsecured credit facility also includes an accordion feature that permits us to increase our aggregate borrowing capacity thereunder to up to $3.5 billion.
As of December 31, 2015, we had $180.7 million of borrowings outstanding, $14.9 million of letters of credit outstanding and $1.8 billion of unused borrowing capacity available under our unsecured revolving credit facility.
In August 2015, we completed a $900 million five year term loan having a variable interest rate of LIBOR plus 97.5 basis points. The term loan matures in 2020.
Also in August 2015, we repaid $305.0 million of our $800.0 million unsecured term loan due 2019 and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $1.6 million representing a write-off of the then unamortized deferred financing fees.
The agreement governing our unsecured credit facility requires us to comply with various financial and other restrictive covenants. See “Note 10—Borrowing Arrangements” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We were in compliance with all of these covenants at December 31, 2015.
Senior Notes
As of December 31, 2015, we had $6.8 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by our subsidiary, Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership (“Ventas Realty”), and guaranteed by Ventas, Inc. outstanding as follows:
$550.0 million principal amount of 1.55% senior notes due 2016;
$300.0 million principal amount of 1.250% senior notes due 2017;
$700.0 million principal amount of 2.00% senior notes due 2018;
$600.0 million principal amount of 4.00% senior notes due 2019;
$500.0 million principal amount of 2.700% senior notes due 2020;
$700.0 million principal amount of 4.750% senior notes due 2021;
$600.0 million principal amount of 4.25% senior notes due 2022;
$500.0 million principal amount of 3.25% senior notes due 2022;
$400.0 million principal amount of 3.750% senior notes due 2024;
$600.0 million principal amount of 3.500% senior notes due 2025;
$500.0 million principal amount of 4.125% senior notes due 2026;
$258.8 million principal amount of 5.45% senior notes due 2043;
$300.0 million principal amount of 5.70% senior notes due 2043; and
$300.0 million principal amount of 4.375% senior notes due 2045.
With the exception of the senior notes due 2016, the senior notes due 2017, the senior notes due 2024, the senior notes due 2025, the senior notes due 2026, the 5.70% senior notes due 2043, and the senior notes due 2045, all of these senior notes were co-issued with Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation.

71


As of December 31, 2015, we had $75.4 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes of our subsidiary, Nationwide Health Properties, LLC (“NHP LLC”), as successor to NHP, outstanding as follows:
$52.4 million principal amount of 6.90% senior notes due 2037 (subject to earlier repayment at the option of the holder); and
$23.0 million principal amount of 6.59% senior notes due 2038 (subject to earlier repayment at the option of the holder).
In addition, as of December 31, 2015, we had $650.3 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes of our wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Canada Finance Limited, and guaranteed by Ventas, Inc. outstanding as follows:
$289.0 million (CAD 400.0 million) principal amount of 3.00% senior notes, series A due 2019;
$180.6 million (CAD 250.0 million) principal amount of 3.300% senior notes due 2022; and
$180.6 million (CAD 250.0 million) principal amount of 4.125% senior notes, series B due 2024.
In January 2015, we issued and sold $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.500% senior notes due 2025 at a public offering price equal to 99.663% of par, for total proceeds of $598.0 million before the underwriting discount and expenses, and $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.375% senior notes due 2045 at a public offering price equal to 99.500% of par, for total proceeds of $298.5 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.
Also in January 2015, Ventas Canada Finance Limited, issued and sold CAD 250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.30% senior notes, series C due 2022 at an offering price equal to 99.992% of par, for total proceeds of CAD 250.0 million before the agent fees and expenses. The notes were offered on a private placement basis in Canada.
In May 2015, we repaid in full, at par, $234.4 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 6% senior notes due 2015 upon maturity.
In July 2015, we issued and sold $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.125% senior notes due 2026 at a public offering price equal to 99.218% of par, for total proceeds of $496.1 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.
In September 2015, we redeemed all $400.0 million principal amount then outstanding of our 3.125% senior notes due November 2015 at a redemption price equal to 100.7% of par, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $2.9 million.
2014 Activity
In April 2014, Ventas Realty issued and sold $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 1.250% senior notes due 2017 at a public offering price equal to 99.815% of par, for total proceeds of $299.4 million before the underwriting discount and expenses, and $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.750% senior notes due 2024 at a public offering price equal to 99.304% of par, for total proceeds of $397.2 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.
In September 2014, Ventas Canada Finance Limited issued and sold CAD 400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.00% senior notes, series A due 2019 at an offering price equal to 99.713% of par, for total proceeds of CAD 398.9 million before the agent fees and expenses, and CAD 250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.125% senior notes, series B due 2024 at an offering price equal to 99.601% of par, for total proceeds of CAD 249.0 million before the agent fees and expenses. The notes were offered on a private placement basis in Canada.
2013 Activity
In February 2013, we repaid in full, at par, $270.0 million principal amount then outstanding of our 6.25% senior notes due 2013 upon maturity.
In March 2013, we issued and sold: $258.8 million aggregate principal amount of 5.45% senior notes due 2043 at a public offering price equal to par, for total proceeds of $258.8 million before the underwriting discounts and expenses; and $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.700% senior notes due 2020 at a public offering price equal to 99.942% of par, for total proceeds of $499.7 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.
In September 2013, we issued and sold: $550.0 million aggregate principal amount of 1.55% senior notes due 2016 at a public offering price equal to 99.910% of par, for total proceeds of $549.5 million before the underwriting discount and expenses; and $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.70% senior notes due 2043 at a public offering price equal to 99.628% of par, for total proceeds of $298.9 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.

72


We may, from time to time, seek to retire or purchase our outstanding senior notes for cash or in exchange for equity securities in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions, prospects for future access to capital and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.
The indentures governing our outstanding senior notes require us to comply with various financial and other restrictive covenants. See “Note 10—Borrowing Arrangements” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We were in compliance with all of these covenants at December 31, 2015.
Mortgage Loan Obligations
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, our consolidated aggregate principal amount of mortgage debt outstanding was $2.0 billion and $2.3 billion, respectively, of which our share was $1.9 billion and $2.2 billion, respectively.
During 2015, we repaid in full mortgage loans in the aggregate principal amount of $461.9 million and a weighted average maturity of 2.1 years and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $9.9 million in connection with these repayments.
During 2014, we assumed or incurred mortgage debt of $246.8 million and repaid in full mortgage loans outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $398.0 million. We recognized a net loss on extinguishment of debt of $2.3 million in connection with these repayments.
During 2013, we assumed or incurred mortgage debt of $178.8 million in connection with our $1.8 billion of gross investments, and we repaid in full mortgage loans outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $493.7 million. We recognized a net gain on extinguishment of debt of $0.5 million in connection with these repayments.
See “Note 4Acquisitions of Real Estate Property” and “Note 10Borrowing Arrangements” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Dividends
In order to continue to qualify as a REIT, we must make annual distributions to our stockholders of at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (excluding net capital gain). In 2015, our Board of Directors declared and we paid cash dividends on our common stock aggregating $3.04 per share, which exceeds 100% of our 2015 estimated taxable income after the use of any net operating loss carryforwards. We intend to pay dividends greater than 100% of our taxable income, after the use of any net operating loss carryforwards, for 2016. On August 17, 2015, we also distributed a stock dividend of one CCP common share for every four shares of Ventas common stock held as of the distribution record date of August 10, 2015. The stock dividend was valued at $8.51 per Ventas share based on the opening price of CCP stock on its first day of regular-way trading on the New York Stock Exchange.
We expect that our cash flows will exceed our REIT taxable income due to depreciation and other non-cash deductions in computing REIT taxable income and that we will be able to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement. However, from time to time, we may not have sufficient cash on hand or other liquid assets to meet this requirement or we may decide to retain cash or distribute such greater amount as may be necessary to avoid income and excise taxation. If we do not have sufficient cash on hand or other liquid assets to enable us to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement, or if we desire to retain cash, we may borrow funds, issue additional equity securities, pay taxable stock dividends, if possible, distribute other property or securities or engage in a transaction intended to enable us to meet the REIT distribution requirements or any combination of the foregoing. See “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Requirements for Qualification as a REIT—Annual Distribution Requirements” included in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Capital Expenditures
The terms of our triple-net leases generally obligate our tenants to pay all capital expenditures necessary to maintain and improve our triple-net leased properties. However, from time to time, we may fund the capital expenditures for our triple-net leased properties through loans to the tenants or advances, which may increase the amount of rent payable with respect to the properties in certain cases. We expect to fund any capital expenditures for which we may become responsible upon expiration of our triple-net leases or in the event that our tenants are unable or unwilling to meet their obligations under those leases with cash flows from operations or through additional borrowings.
We also expect to fund capital expenditures related to our senior living operations and MOB operations reportable business segments with the cash flows from the properties or through additional borrowings. To the extent that unanticipated capital expenditure needs arise or significant borrowings are required, our liquidity may be affected adversely. Our ability to

73


borrow additional funds may be restricted in certain circumstances by the terms of the instruments governing our outstanding indebtedness.
We are party to certain agreements that obligate us to develop seniors housing or healthcare properties funded through capital that we and, in certain circumstances, our joint venture partners provide. As of December 31, 2015, we had four properties under development pursuant to these agreements, including two properties that are owned by an unconsolidated real estate entity. Through December 31, 2015, we have funded $15.5 million of our share of estimated total commitment over the projected development period ($69.0 million to $72.9 million) toward these projects. In addition, from time to time, we engage in redevelopment projects with respect to our existing seniors housing communities to maximize the value, increase NOI, maintain a market-competitive position, achieve property stabilization or change the primary use of the property.
Equity Offerings and Related Events
In March 2013, we established an “at-the-market” (“ATM”) equity offering program through which we could sell from time to time up to an aggregate of $750 million of our common stock. In January 2015, we issued and sold 3,750,202 shares of common stock under our previous ATM equity offering program for aggregate net proceeds of $285.4 million, after sales agent commissions of $4.4 million. In March 2015, we replaced our previous shelf registration statement that was scheduled to expire in accordance with the SEC’s rules with a new universal shelf registration statement, rendering our previous ATM program inaccessible. In connection with our new universal shelf registration statement, we established a new ATM program pursuant to which we may sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate of $1.0 billion of our common stock. Through the remainder of 2015 and in the first quarter of 2016 we have issued and sold a total of 5,084,302 shares of our common stock under our ATM equity offering program for aggregate net proceeds of $297.0 million, after sales agent commissions of $4.5 million.
Other
We received proceeds of $6.4 million and $26.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, from the exercises of outstanding stock options. Future proceeds from the exercises of stock options will be affected primarily by the future trading price of our common stock and the number of options outstanding. The number of options outstanding increased to 3,051,729 as of December 31, 2015, from 2,460,628 as of December 31, 2014. The weighted average exercise price was $52.62 as of December 31, 2015.
We issued approximately 19,000 shares of common stock under our Distribution Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (“DRIP”) for net proceeds of $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The DRIP was suspended effective July 3, 2014. We may determine whether or not to reinstate the DRIP at any time, in our sole discretion.
Cash Flows
The following table sets forth our sources and uses of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014:
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease)
to Cash
 
2015
 
2014
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$
55,348

 
$
94,816

 
$
(39,468
)
 
(41.6
)%
Net cash provided by operating activities
1,391,767

 
1,254,845

 
136,922

 
10.9

Net cash used in investing activities
(2,423,692
)
 
(2,055,040
)
 
(368,652
)
 
(17.9
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
1,030,122

 
758,057

 
272,065

 
35.9

Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents
(522
)
 
2,670

 
(3,192
)
 
nm

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
53,023

 
$
55,348

 
(2,325
)
 
(4.2
)
    
nm—not meaningful 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Cash flows from operating activities increased in 2015 over the prior year primarily due to 2014 and 2015 acquisitions, payments received from tenants in 2015 and increases in fee income, partially offset by increased merger-related expenses and deal costs and a full year’s results in 2014 from the properties that were spun off to CCP.
    

74


Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities during 2015 and 2014 consisted primarily of cash paid for our investments in real estate ($2.7 billion and $1.5 billion in 2015 and 2014, respectively), investments in loans receivable ($171.1 million and $499.0 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively), purchase of marketable securities ($96.7 million in 2014), capital expenditures ($107.5 million and $87.5 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively), development project expenditures ($119.7 million and $107.0 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively) and investment in unconsolidated operating entity ($26.3 million in 2015). These uses were partially offset by proceeds from loans receivable ($109.2 million and $73.6 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively), proceeds from the sale or maturity of marketable debt securities ($76.8 million and $21.7 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively), and proceeds from real estate dispositions ($492.4 million and $118.2 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively).
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities during 2015 and 2014 consisted primarily of net borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility ($540.2 million in 2014), net proceeds from the issuance of debt ($2.5 billion and $2.0 billion in 2015 and 2014, respectively), proceeds of debt related to the CCP Spin-Off ($1.4 billion in 2015) and net proceeds from the issuance of common stock ($491.0 million and $242.1 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively). These cash inflows were partially offset by debt repayments ($1.4 billion and $1.2 billion in 2015 and 2014, respectively), cash distributions to common stockholders, unitholders and noncontrolling interest parties ($1.0 billion and $890.9 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively), net payments made on our unsecured revolving credit facility ($723.5 million in 2015), net cash impact of the CCP Spin-Off ($128.7 million in 2015) and payments for deferred financing costs ($24.7 million and $14.2 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively).
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes the effect that minimum debt (which includes principal and interest payments) and other material noncancelable commitments are expected to have on our cash flow in future periods as of December 31, 2015:
 
Total
 
Less than 1
year (4)
 
1 - 3 years (5)
 
3 - 5 years (6)
 
More than 5
years (7)
 
(In thousands)
Long-term debt obligations (1) (2) (3)
$
14,603,925

 
$
1,020,977

 
$
2,770,287

 
$
3,867,824

 
$
6,944,837

Operating obligations, including ground lease obligations
629,512

 
31,346

 
44,840

 
33,372

 
519,954

Total
$
15,233,437

 
$
1,052,323

 
$
2,815,127

 
$
3,901,196

 
$
7,464,791


(1)
Amounts represent contractual amounts due, including interest.
(2)
Interest on variable rate debt was based on forward rates obtained as of December 31, 2015.
(3)
Excludes $22.9 million of mortgage debt related to real estate assets classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2015 that is scheduled to mature in 2016 and 2017.
(4)
Includes $550.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 1.55% senior notes due 2016.
(5)
Includes $300.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 1.250% senior notes due 2017, $180.7 million of borrowings outstanding on our unsecured revolving credit facility, $700.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 2.00% senior notes due 2018 and $200.0 million of borrowings under our unsecured term loan due 2018.
(6)
Includes $468.5 million of borrowings under our unsecured term loan due 2019, $600.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 4.00% senior notes due 2019, $289.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.00% senior notes, series A due 2019, $500.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 2.700% senior notes due 2020 and $900.0 million of borrowings under our unsecured term loan due 2020.
(7)
Includes $4.6 billion aggregate principal amount outstanding of our senior notes maturing between 2021 and 2045. $52.4 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 6.90% senior notes due 2037 are subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, on October 1 in each of 2017 and 2027, and $23.0 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 6.59% senior notes due 2038 are subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, on July 7 in each of 2018, 2023 and 2028.
As of December 31, 2015, we had $24.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits that are excluded from the table above, as we are unable to make a reasonable reliable estimate of the period of cash settlement, if any, with the respective tax authority.

75


ITEM 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The information set forth in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Asset/Liability Management” is incorporated by reference into this Item 7A.


76


ITEM 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Ventas, Inc.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules


Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
 
      Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
      Schedule IV—Real Estate Mortgage Loans


77


MANAGEMENT REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act of 1934. This system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.

Management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2015.
 
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report included herein.






78


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Stockholders and Board of Directors
Ventas, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ventas, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the information in financial statement schedules II, III and IV. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ventas, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules II, III and IV, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for discontinued operations in 2014 due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Ventas, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 12, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
February 12, 2016




79


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Stockholders and Board of Directors
Ventas, Inc.:
We have audited Ventas, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management Report on the Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Ventas Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015, respectively, and our report dated February 12, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting for discontinued operations.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 12, 2016




80


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 
2015
 
2014
 
(In thousands, except per
share amounts)
Assets
 
 
 
Real estate investments:
 
 
 
Land and improvements
$
2,056,428

 
$
1,711,654

Buildings and improvements
20,309,599

 
17,420,392

Construction in progress
92,005

 
109,689

Acquired lease intangibles
1,344,422

 
955,035

 
23,802,454

 
20,196,770

Accumulated depreciation and amortization
(4,177,234
)
 
(3,423,780
)
Net real estate property
19,625,220

 
16,772,990

Secured loans receivable and investments, net
857,112

 
802,881

Investments in unconsolidated real estate entities
95,707

 
91,872

Net real estate investments
20,578,039

 
17,667,743

Cash and cash equivalents
53,023

 
55,348

Escrow deposits and restricted cash
77,896

 
71,771

Goodwill
1,047,497

 
363,971

Assets held for sale
93,060

 
2,555,322

Other assets
412,403

 
451,758

Total assets
$
22,261,918

 
$
21,165,913

Liabilities and equity
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
Senior notes payable and other debt
$
11,206,996

 
$
10,844,351

Accrued interest
80,864

 
62,182

Accounts payable and other liabilities
779,380

 
750,657

Liabilities related to assets held for sale
34,340

 
237,973

Deferred income taxes
338,382

 
344,337

Total liabilities
12,439,962

 
12,239,500

Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests
196,529

 
172,016

Commitments and contingencies

 

Equity:
 
 
 
Ventas stockholders’ equity:
 
 
 
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 10,000 shares authorized, unissued

 

Common stock, $0.25 par value; 600,000 shares authorized, 334,386 and 298,478 shares issued at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively
83,579

 
74,656

Capital in excess of par value
11,602,838

 
10,119,306

Accumulated other comprehensive income
(7,565
)
 
13,121

Retained earnings (deficit)
(2,111,958
)
 
(1,526,388
)
Treasury stock, 44 and 7 shares at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively
(2,567
)
 
(511
)
Total Ventas stockholders’ equity
9,564,327

 
8,680,184

Noncontrolling interest
61,100

 
74,213

Total equity
9,625,427

 
8,754,397

Total liabilities and equity
$
22,261,918

 
$
21,165,913

  See accompanying notes.

81


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands, except per share
amounts)
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income:
 
 
 
 
 
Triple-net leased
$
779,801

 
$
674,547

 
$
586,016

Medical office buildings
566,245

 
463,910

 
450,340

 
1,346,046

 
1,138,457

 
1,036,356

Resident fees and services
1,811,255

 
1,552,951

 
1,406,005

Medical office building and other services revenue
41,492

 
29,364

 
17,809

Income from loans and investments
86,553

 
51,778

 
54,425

Interest and other income
1,052

 
4,263

 
2,022

Total revenues
3,286,398

 
2,776,813

 
2,516,617

Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
Interest
367,114

 
292,065

 
249,009

Depreciation and amortization
894,057

 
725,216

 
629,908

Property-level operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
Senior living
1,209,415

 
1,036,556

 
956,684

Medical office buildings
174,225

 
158,832

 
153,241

 
1,383,640

 
1,195,388

 
1,109,925

Medical office building services costs
26,565

 
17,092

 
8,315

General, administrative and professional fees
128,035

 
121,738

 
115,083

Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
14,411

 
5,564

 
1,201

Merger-related expenses and deal costs
102,944

 
43,304

 
21,634

Other
17,957

 
25,743

 
17,364

Total expenses
2,934,723

 
2,426,110

 
2,152,439

Income before loss from unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations, real estate dispositions and noncontrolling interest
351,675

 
350,703

 
364,178

Loss from unconsolidated entities
(1,420
)
 
(139
)
 
(508
)
Income tax benefit
39,284

 
8,732

 
11,828

Income from continuing operations
389,539

 
359,296

 
375,498

Discontinued operations
11,103

 
99,735

 
79,171

Gain on real estate dispositions
18,580

 
17,970

 

Net income
419,222

 
477,001

 
454,669

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
1,379

 
1,234

 
1,160

Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
417,843

 
$
475,767

 
$
453,509

Earnings per common share:
 
 
 
 
 
Basic:
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders, including real estate dispositions
$
1.23

 
$
1.28

 
$
1.28

Discontinued operations
0.03

 
0.34

 
0.27

Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
1.26

 
$
1.62

 
$
1.55

Diluted:
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders, including real estate dispositions
$
1.22

 
$
1.26

 
$
1.27

Discontinued operations
0.03

 
0.34

 
0.27

Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
1.25

 
$
1.60

 
$
1.54

Weighted average shares used in computing earnings per common share:
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
330,311

 
294,175

 
292,654

Diluted
334,007

 
296,677

 
295,110

  See accompanying notes.

82


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
$
419,222

 
$
477,001

 
$
454,669

Other comprehensive loss:
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation
(14,792
)
 
(17,153
)
 
(5,422
)
Change in unrealized gain on marketable debt securities
(5,047
)
 
7,001

 
(1,023
)
Other
(847
)
 
3,614

 
2,750

Total other comprehensive loss
(20,686
)
 
(6,538
)
 
(3,695
)
Comprehensive income
398,536

 
470,463

 
450,974

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest
1,379

 
1,234

 
1,160

Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders
$
397,157

 
$
469,229

 
$
449,814

See accompanying notes.

83



VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
 
Common
Stock Par
Value
 
Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
 
Retained
Earnings
(Deficit)
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Total Ventas
Stockholders’
Equity
 
Non- controlling
Interest
 
Total Equity
 
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Balance at January 1, 2013
$
73,904

 
$
9,920,962

 
$
23,354

 
$
(777,927
)
 
$
(221,165
)
 
$
9,019,128

 
$
70,235

 
$
9,089,363

Net income (loss)

 

 

 
453,509

 

 
453,509

 
1,160

 
454,669

Other comprehensive loss

 

 
(3,695
)
 

 

 
(3,695
)
 

 
(3,695
)
Acquisition-related activity

 
(762
)
 

 

 

 
(762
)
 
12,717

 
11,955

Net change in noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

 

 

 
(7,982
)
 
(7,982
)
Dividends to common stockholders—$2.735 per share

 

 

 
(802,123
)
 

 
(802,123
)
 

 
(802,123
)
Issuance of common stock
517

 
140,826

 

 

 

 
141,343

 

 
141,343

Issuance of common stock for stock plans
19

 
5,983

 

 

 
6,638

 
12,640

 

 
12,640

Change in redeemable noncontrolling interest

 
(13,751
)
 

 

 

 
(13,751
)
 
3,400

 
(10,351
)
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value

 
8,683

 

 

 

 
8,683

 

 
8,683

Purchase of OP units

 
(579
)
 

 

 
502

 
(77
)
 

 
(77
)
Grant of restricted stock, net of forfeitures
48

 
17,230

 

 

 
(7,892
)
 
9,386

 

 
9,386

Balance at December 31, 2013
74,488

 
10,078,592

 
19,659

 
(1,126,541
)
 
(221,917
)
 
8,824,281

 
79,530

 
8,903,811

Net income (loss)

 

 

 
475,767

 

 
475,767

 
1,234

 
477,001

Other comprehensive income

 

 
(6,538
)
 

 

 
(6,538
)
 

 
(6,538
)
Retirement of stock
(924
)
 
(220,152
)
 

 

 
221,076

 

 

 

Acquisition-related activity
37

 
10,141

 

 

 

 
10,178

 

 
10,178

Net change in noncontrolling interest

 
1,163

 

 

 

 
1,163

 
(8,477
)
 
(7,314
)
Dividends to common stockholders—$2.965 per share

 

 

 
(875,614
)
 

 
(875,614
)
 

 
(875,614
)
Issuance of common stock
845

 
241,262

 

 

 

 
242,107

 

 
242,107

Issuance of common stock for stock plans
173

 
29,266

 

 

 
3,858

 
33,297

 

 
33,297

Change in redeemable noncontrolling interest

 
(1,082
)
 

 

 

 
(1,082
)
 
1,926

 
844

Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value

 
(32,993
)
 

 

 

 
(32,993
)
 

 
(32,993
)
Purchase of OP units
1

 
(83
)
 

 

 

 
(82
)
 

 
(82
)
Grant of restricted stock, net of forfeitures
36

 
13,192

 

 

 
(3,528
)
 
9,700

 

 
9,700

Balance at December 31, 2014
74,656

 
10,119,306

 
13,121

 
(1,526,388
)
 
(511
)
 
8,680,184

 
74,213

 
8,754,397

Net income

 

 

 
417,843

 

 
417,843

 
1,379

 
419,222

Other comprehensive loss

 

 
(20,686
)
 

 

 
(20,686
)
 

 
(20,686
)
Acquisition-related activity
7,103

 
2,209,202

 

 

 

 
2,216,305

 
853

 
2,217,158

Impact of CCP Spin-Off

 
(1,247,356
)
 

 

 

 
(1,247,356
)
 
(4,717
)
 
(1,252,073
)
Net change in noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

 

 

 
(12,530
)
 
(12,530
)
Dividends to common stockholders—$3.04 per share

 

 

 
(1,003,413
)
 

 
(1,003,413
)
 

 
(1,003,413
)
Issuance of common stock
1,797

 
489,227

 

 

 

 
491,024

 

 
491,024

Issuance of common stock for stock plans
23

 
6,068

 

 

 
5,945

 
12,036

 

 
12,036

Change in redeemable noncontrolling interest

 
(374
)
 

 

 

 
(374
)
 
1,902

 
1,528

Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value

 
7,831

 

 

 

 
7,831

 

 
7,831

Purchase of OP units

 
1,719

 

 

 

 
1,719

 

 
1,719

Grant of restricted stock, net of forfeitures

 
17,215

 

 

 
(8,001
)
 
9,214

 

 
9,214

Balance at December 31, 2015
$
83,579

 
$
11,602,838

 
$
(7,565
)
 
$
(2,111,958
)
 
$
(2,567
)
 
$
9,564,327

 
$
61,100

 
$
9,625,427

   See accompanying notes.

84


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
$
419,222

 
$
477,001

 
$
454,669

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization (including amounts in discontinued operations)
973,663

 
828,467

 
769,881

Amortization of deferred revenue and lease intangibles, net
(24,129
)
 
(18,871
)
 
(15,793
)
Other non-cash amortization
5,448

 
(312
)
 
(16,745
)
Stock-based compensation
19,537

 
20,994

 
20,653

Straight-lining of rental income, net
(33,792
)
 
(38,687
)
 
(30,540
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
14,411

 
5,564

 
1,048

Gain on real estate dispositions (including amounts in discontinued operations)
(18,811
)
 
(19,183
)
 
(3,617
)
Gain on real estate loan investments

 
(1,455
)
 
(5,056
)
Gain on sale of marketable securities
(5,800
)
 

 
(856
)
Income tax benefit (including amounts in discontinued operations)
(42,384
)
 
(9,431
)
 
(11,828
)
Loss from unconsolidated entities
1,244

 
139

 
1,748

Loss (gain) on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, net
176

 

 
(1,241
)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities
23,462

 
6,508

 
6,641

Other
6,517

 
9,416

 
1,986

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
Decrease (increase) in other assets
42,316

 
5,317

 
(690
)
Increase in accrued interest
19,995

 
7,958

 
6,806

(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and other liabilities
(9,308
)
 
(18,580
)
 
17,689

Net cash provided by operating activities
1,391,767

 
1,254,845

 
1,194,755

Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Net investment in real estate property
(2,650,788
)
 
(1,468,286
)
 
(1,437,002
)
Investment in loans receivable and other
(171,144
)
 
(498,992
)
 
(37,963
)
Proceeds from real estate disposals
492,408

 
118,246

 
35,591

Proceeds from loans receivable
109,176

 
73,557

 
325,518

Purchase of marketable securities

 
(96,689
)
 

Proceeds from sale or maturity of marketable securities
76,800

 
21,689

 
5,493

Funds held in escrow for future development expenditures
4,003

 
4,590

 
19,458

Development project expenditures
(119,674
)
 
(106,988
)
 
(95,741
)
Capital expenditures
(107,487
)
 
(87,454
)
 
(81,614
)
Investment in unconsolidated operating entity
(26,282
)
 

 

Contributions to unconsolidated entities
(30,704
)
 
(5,598
)
 
(2,169
)
Other

 
(9,115
)
 
(14,331
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(2,423,692
)
 
(2,055,040
)
 
(1,282,760
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Net change in borrowings under credit facilities
(723,457
)
 
540,203

 
(164,029
)
Net cash impact of CCP Spin-Off
(128,749
)
 

 

Proceeds from debt
2,512,747

 
2,007,707

 
2,767,546

Proceeds from debt related to CCP Spin-Off
1,400,000

 

 

Repayment of debt
(1,435,596
)
 
(1,151,395
)
 
(1,792,492
)
Purchase of noncontrolling interest
(3,819
)
 

 

Payment of deferred financing costs
(24,665
)
 
(14,220
)
 
(31,277
)
Issuance of common stock, net
491,023

 
242,107

 
141,343

Cash distribution to common stockholders
(1,003,413
)
 
(875,614
)
 
(802,123
)
Cash distribution to redeemable OP unitholders
(15,095
)
 
(5,762
)
 
(5,040
)
Purchases of redeemable OP units
(33,188
)
 
(503
)
 
(659
)
Contributions from noncontrolling interest

 
491

 
2,395

Distributions to noncontrolling interest
(12,649
)
 
(9,559
)
 
(9,286
)
Other
6,983

 
24,602

 
8,618

Net cash provided by financing activities
1,030,122

 
758,057

 
114,996

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(1,803
)
 
(42,138
)
 
26,991

Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents
(522
)
 
2,670

 
(83
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
55,348

 
94,816

 
67,908

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
53,023

 
$
55,348

 
$
94,816


85


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
 
 
 
 
 
Interest paid including swap payments and receipts
$
391,699

 
$
361,144

 
$
338,311

Supplemental schedule of non-cash activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Assets and liabilities assumed from acquisitions:
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate investments
$
2,565,960

 
$
370,741

 
$
223,955

Utilization of funds held for an Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 exchange
(8,911
)
 

 

Other assets acquired
20,090

 
15,280

 
6,635

Debt assumed
177,857

 
241,076

 
183,848

Other liabilities
54,459

 
24,039

 
29,868

Deferred income tax liability
52,153

 
110,728

 
5,181

Noncontrolling interests
88,085

 

 
11,693

Equity issued
2,204,585

 
10,178

 

Non-cash impact of CCP Spin-Off
1,256,404

 

 

See accompanying notes.

86

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



Note 1—Description of Business
Ventas, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated or except where the context otherwise requires, “we,” “us” or “our”), an S&P 500 company, is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) with a highly diversified portfolio of seniors housing and healthcare properties located throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. As of December 31, 2015, we owned approximately 1,300 properties (including properties classified as held for sale), consisting of seniors housing communities, medical office buildings (“MOBs”), skilled nursing facilities, specialty hospitals and general acute care hospitals, and we had four properties under development, including two properties that are owned by an unconsolidated real estate entity. Our company was originally founded in 1983 and is currently headquartered in Chicago, Illinois. As further discussed in “Note 5—Dispositions”, in August 2015 we completed the spin-off of most of our post-acute/skilled nursing facility portfolio into an independent, publicly traded REIT named Care Capital Properties, Inc. (“CCP”) (the “CCP Spin-Off”). The historical results of operations of the CCP properties as well as the related assets and liabilities are presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
We primarily invest in seniors housing and healthcare properties through acquisitions and lease our properties to unaffiliated tenants or operate them through independent third-party managers. As of December 31, 2015, we leased a total of 607 properties (excluding MOBs and properties classified as held for sale) to various healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures, and we engaged independent operators, such as Atria Senior Living, Inc. (“Atria”) and Sunrise Senior Living, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Sunrise”), to manage 304 seniors housing communities for us pursuant to long-term management agreements. Our three largest tenants, Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Brookdale Senior Living”), Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Kindred”) and Ardent Health Partners, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Ardent”) leased from us 140 properties (excluding six properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and one property managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to a long-term management agreement), 76 properties and ten properties, respectively, as of December 31, 2015.
Through our Lillibridge Healthcare Services, Inc. (“Lillibridge”) subsidiary and our ownership interest in PMB Real Estate Services LLC (“PMBRES”), we also provide MOB management, leasing, marketing, facility development and advisory services to highly rated hospitals and health systems throughout the United States. In addition, from time to time, we make secured and non-mortgage loans and other investments relating to seniors housing and healthcare operators or properties.
Note 2—Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly owned subsidiaries and the joint venture entities over which we exercise control. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation, and our net earnings are reduced by the portion of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests.
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires us to identify entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights and to determine which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). A VIE is broadly defined as an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; and (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. We consolidate our investment in a VIE when we determine that we are its primary beneficiary. We may change our original assessment of a VIE upon subsequent events such as the modification of contractual arrangements that affects the characteristics or adequacy of the entity’s equity investments at risk and the disposition of all or a portion of an interest held by the primary beneficiary.
We identify the primary beneficiary of a VIE as the enterprise that has both: (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance; and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the entity. We perform this analysis on an ongoing basis.

87

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


As it relates to investments in joint ventures, GAAP may preclude consolidation by the sole general partner in certain circumstances based on the type of rights held by the limited partner(s). We assess limited partners’ rights and their impact on the presumption of control of the limited partnership by the sole general partner when an investor becomes the sole general partner, and we reassess if there is a change to the terms or in the exercisability of the rights of the limited partners, the sole general partner increases or decreases its ownership of limited partnership interests, or there is an increase or decrease in the number of outstanding limited partnership interests. We also apply this guidance to managing member interests in limited liability companies.
Investments in Unconsolidated Entities
We report investments in unconsolidated entities over whose operating and financial policies we have the ability to exercise significant influence under the equity method of accounting. Under this method of accounting, our share of the investee’s earnings or losses is included in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
We base the initial carrying value of investments in unconsolidated entities on the fair value of the assets at the time we acquired the joint venture interest. We estimate fair values for our equity method investments based on discounted cash flow models that include all estimated cash inflows and outflows over a specified holding period and, where applicable, any estimated debt premiums or discounts. The capitalization rates, discount rates and credit spreads we use in these models are based upon assumptions that we believe to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective investments.
We generally amortize any difference between our cost basis and the basis reflected at the joint venture level, if any, over the lives of the related assets and liabilities and include that amortization in our share of income or loss from unconsolidated entities. For earnings of equity method investments with pro rata distribution allocations, net income or loss is allocated between the partners in the joint venture based on their respective stated ownership percentages. In other instances, net income or loss is allocated between the partners in the joint venture based on the hypothetical liquidation at book value method (the “HLBV method”). Under the HLBV method, net income or loss is allocated between the partners based on the difference between each partner’s claim on the net assets of the joint venture at the end and beginning of the period, after taking into account contributions and distributions. Each partner’s share of the net assets of the joint venture is calculated as the amount that the partner would receive if the joint venture were to liquidate all of its assets at net book value and distribute the resulting cash to creditors and partners in accordance with their respective priorities. Under this method, in any given period, we could record more or less income than the joint venture has generated, than actual cash distributions received or than the amount we may receive in the event of an actual liquidation.
Redeemable OP Unitholder and Noncontrolling Interests
We own a majority interest in NHP/PMB L.P. (“NHP/PMB”), a limited partnership formed in 2008 to acquire properties from entities affiliated with Pacific Medical Buildings LLC. We consolidate NHP/PMB, as our wholly owned subsidiary is the general partner and exercises control of the partnership. As of December 31, 2015, third party investors owned 2,812,318 Class A limited partnership units in NHP/PMB (“OP Units”), which represented 28.9% of the total units then outstanding, and we owned 6,917,009 Class B limited partnership units in NHP/PMB, representing the remaining 71.1%. At any time following the first anniversary of the date of their issuance, the OP Units may be redeemed at the election of the holder for cash or, at our option, 0.9051 shares of our common stock per unit, as adjusted from 0.7866 shares of common stock per unit in connection with the CCP Spin-Off, and subject to further adjustment in certain circumstances. We are party by assumption to a registration rights agreement with the holders of the OP Units that requires us, subject to the terms and conditions and certain exceptions set forth therein, to file and maintain a registration statement relating to the issuance of shares of our common stock upon redemption of OP Units.
On January 16, 2015, in connection with our acquisition of American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust, Inc. (“HCT”), each of the 7,057,271 issued and outstanding limited partnership units of American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust Operating Partnership, L.P. (subsequently renamed Ventas Realty Capital Healthcare Trust Operating Partnership, L.P. (“Ventas Realty OP”)), a limited partnership in which HCT was the sole general partner prior to the acquisition, was converted into a newly created class of limited partnership units (“Class C Units”) at the 0.1688 exchange ratio payable to HCT stockholders in the acquisition, net of any Class C Units withheld to pay taxes. We consolidate Ventas Realty OP, as our wholly owned subsidiary is the general partner and exercises control of the partnership. The Class C Units may be redeemed at the election of the holder for one share of our common stock per unit or, at our option, an equivalent amount in cash, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. We are party by assumption to a registration rights agreement with the holders of the Class C Units that requires us, subject to the terms and conditions and certain exceptions set forth therein, to file and maintain a registration statement relating to the issuance of shares of our common stock upon redemption of Class C Units. As of December 31, 2015, third party investors owned 672,984 Class C Units, which represented 2.3% of the total units then outstanding, and we owned

88

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


28,550,812 Class C Units and 176,374 OP units in Ventas Realty OP, representing the remaining 97.7%. In April 2015, third party investors redeemed 445,541 Class C Units for approximately $32.6 million.
As redemption rights are outside of our control, the redeemable OP unitholder interests are classified outside of permanent equity on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We reflect the redeemable OP unitholder interests at the greater of cost or fair value. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the fair value of the redeemable OP unitholder interests was $188.5 million and $159.1 million, respectively. We recognize changes in fair value through capital in excess of par value, net of cash distributions paid and purchases by us of any OP Units. Our diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) includes the effect of any potential shares outstanding from redemption of the OP Units.
Beginning on January 16, 2016 and as of February 10, 2016, third party investors executed redemption right exercise notices for Ventas Realty Capital Healthcare Trust Operating Partnership, L.P. to redeem 303,136 Class C Units. We expect that the Class C Units will be redeemed through the issuance of 303,136 shares of Ventas common stock on or before April 1, 2016, but we have the right to redeem the Class C Units for a cash amount.
Certain noncontrolling interests of other consolidated joint ventures were also classified as redeemable at December 31, 2015 and 2014. Accordingly, we record the carrying amount of these noncontrolling interests at the greater of their initial carrying amount (increased or decreased for the noncontrolling interest’s share of net income or loss and distributions) or the redemption value. Our joint venture partners have certain redemption rights with respect to their noncontrolling interests in these joint ventures that are outside of our control, and the redeemable noncontrolling interests are classified outside of permanent equity on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize changes in carrying value of redeemable noncontrolling interests through capital in excess of par value.
Noncontrolling Interests
Excluding the redeemable noncontrolling interests described above, we present the portion of any equity that we do not own in entities that we control (and thus consolidate) as noncontrolling interests and classify those interests as a component of consolidated equity, separate from total Ventas stockholders’ equity, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For consolidated joint ventures with pro rata distribution allocations, net income or loss is allocated between the joint venture partners based on their respective stated ownership percentages. In other instances, net income or loss is allocated between the joint venture partners based on the HLBV method. We account for purchases or sales of equity interests that do not result in a change of control as equity transactions, through capital in excess of par value. In addition, we include net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests in net income in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions regarding future events that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Business Combinations
We account for acquisitions using the acquisition method and record the cost of the businesses acquired among tangible and recognized intangible assets and liabilities based upon their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. Recognized intangibles primarily include the value of in-place leases, acquired lease contracts, tenant and customer relationships, trade names/trademarks and goodwill. We do not amortize goodwill, which represents the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of the net assets of the acquired business and is included in other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We estimate the fair value of buildings acquired on an as-if-vacant basis, or replacement cost basis and depreciate the building value over the estimated remaining life of the building, generally not to exceed 35 years. We determine the fair value of other fixed assets, such as site improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment, based upon the replacement cost and depreciate such value over the assets’ estimated remaining useful lives as determined at the applicable acquisition date. We determine the value of land either by considering the sales prices of similar properties in recent transactions or based on internal analyses of recently acquired and existing comparable properties within our portfolio. We generally determine the value of construction in progress based upon the replacement cost. However, for certain acquired properties that are part of a ground-up development, we determine fair value by using the same valuation approach as for all other properties and deducting the estimated cost to complete the development. During the remaining construction period, we capitalize interest expense until the development has reached substantial completion. Construction in progress, including capitalized interest, is not depreciated until the development has reached substantial completion.

89

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The fair value of acquired lease-related intangibles, if any, reflects: (i) the estimated value of any above and/or below market leases, determined by discounting the difference between the estimated market rent and in-place lease rent; and (ii) the estimated value of in-place leases related to the cost to obtain tenants, including leasing commissions, and an estimated value of the absorption period to reflect the value of the rent and recovery costs foregone during a reasonable lease-up period as if the acquired space was vacant. We amortize any acquired lease-related intangibles to revenue or amortization expense over the remaining life of the associated lease plus any assumed bargain renewal periods. If a lease is terminated prior to its stated expiration or not renewed upon expiration, we recognize all unamortized amounts of lease-related intangibles associated with that lease in operations at that time.
We estimate the fair value of purchase option intangible assets and liabilities, if any, by discounting the difference between the applicable property’s acquisition date fair value and an estimate of its future option price. We do not amortize the resulting intangible asset or liability over the term of the lease, but rather adjust the recognized value of the asset or liability upon sale.
We estimate the fair value of tenant or other customer relationships acquired, if any, by considering the nature and extent of existing business relationships with the tenant or customer, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant or customer, the tenant’s credit quality, expectations of lease renewals with the tenant, and the potential for significant, additional future leasing arrangements with the tenant, and we amortize that value over the expected life of the associated arrangements or leases, including the remaining terms of the related leases and any expected renewal periods. We estimate the fair value of trade names and trademarks using a royalty rate methodology and amortize that value over the estimated useful life of the trade name or trademark.
In connection with a business combination, we may assume rights and obligations under certain lease agreements pursuant to which we become the lessee of a given property. We assume the lease classification previously determined by the prior lessee absent a modification in the assumed lease agreement. We assess assumed operating leases, including ground leases, to determine whether the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable to us given current market conditions on the acquisition date. To the extent the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable to us relative to market conditions on the acquisition date, we recognize an intangible asset or liability at fair value and amortize that asset or liability to interest or rental expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income over the applicable lease term. We include all lease-related intangible assets and liabilities within acquired lease intangibles and accounts payable and other liabilities, respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We determine the fair value of loans receivable acquired in connection with a business combination by discounting the estimated future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar loans with the same terms and length to maturity would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings. We do not establish a valuation allowance at the acquisition date because the estimated future cash flows already reflect our judgment regarding their uncertainty. We recognize the difference between the acquisition date fair value and the total expected cash flows as interest income using an effective interest method over the life of the applicable loan. Subsequent to the acquisition date, we evaluate changes regarding the uncertainty of future cash flows and the need for a valuation allowance, as appropriate.
We estimate the fair value of noncontrolling interests assumed consistent with the manner in which we value all of the underlying assets and liabilities.
We calculate the fair value of long-term debt by discounting the remaining contractual cash flows on each instrument at the current market rate for those borrowings, which we approximate based on the rate at which we would expect to incur a replacement instrument on the date of acquisition, and recognize any fair value adjustments related to long-term debt as effective yield adjustments over the remaining term of the instrument.
Impairment of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets
We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets, primarily consisting of investments in real estate, for impairment indicators. If indicators of impairment are present, we evaluate the carrying value of the related real estate investments in relation to the future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying operations. In performing this evaluation, we consider market conditions and our current intentions with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. We adjust the net book value of leased properties and other long-lived assets to fair value if the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows, including sales proceeds, is less than book value. We recognize an impairment loss at the time we make any such determination.
If impairment indicators arise with respect to intangible assets with finite useful lives, we evaluate impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If estimated future undiscounted net cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, then we estimate the fair

90

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


value of the asset and compare the estimated fair value to the intangible asset’s carrying value. We recognize any shortfall from carrying value as an impairment loss in the current period.
We evaluate our investments in unconsolidated entities for impairment at least annually, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our investment may exceed its fair value. If we determine that a decline in the fair value of our investment in an unconsolidated entity is other-than-temporary, and if such reduced fair value is below the carrying value, we record an impairment.
We test goodwill for impairment at least annually, and more frequently if indicators arise. We first assess qualitative factors, such as current macroeconomic conditions, state of the equity and capital markets and our overall financial and operating performance, to determine the likelihood that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If we determine it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we proceed with the two-step approach to evaluating impairment. First, we estimate the fair value of the reporting unit and compare it to the reporting unit’s carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds fair value, we proceed with the second step, which requires us to assign the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if it had been acquired in a business combination at the date of the impairment test. The excess fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to the assets and liabilities is the implied value of goodwill and is used to determine the amount of impairment. We recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied value in the current period.
Estimates of fair value used in our evaluation of goodwill (if necessary based on our qualitative assessment), investments in real estate, investments in unconsolidated entities and intangible assets are based upon discounted future cash flow projections or other acceptable valuation techniques that are based, in turn, upon all available evidence including level three inputs, such as revenue and expense growth rates, estimates of future cash flows, capitalization rates, discount rates, general economic conditions and trends, or other available market data. Our ability to accurately predict future operating results and cash flows and to estimate and allocate fair values impacts the timing and recognition of impairments. While we believe our assumptions are reasonable, changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on our financial results.
Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations
We sell properties from time to time for various reasons, including favorable market conditions or the exercise of purchase options by tenants. We classify certain long-lived assets as held for sale once the criteria, as defined by GAAP, has been met. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value minus cost to sell and are no longer depreciated. We report discontinued operations when the following criteria are met: (1) a component of an entity or group of components that has been disposed of or classified as held for sale and represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results; or (2) an acquired business that is classified as held for sale on the acquisition date. Assets relating to the CCP Spin-Off were reported as discontinued operations once the transaction was completed. The results of operations for assets meeting the definition of discontinued operations are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Income as discontinued operations for all periods presented. We allocate estimated interest expense to discontinued operations based on property values and our weighted average interest rate or the property’s actual mortgage interest.
Loans Receivable
We record loans receivable, other than those acquired in connection with a business combination, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets (either in secured loans receivable and investments, net or other assets, in the case of non-mortgage loans receivable) at the unpaid principal balance, net of any deferred origination fees, purchase discounts or premiums and valuation allowances. We amortize net deferred origination fees, which are comprised of loan fees collected from the borrower net of certain direct costs, and purchase discounts or premiums over the contractual life of the loan using the effective interest method and immediately recognize in income any unamortized balances if the loan is repaid before its contractual maturity.
We regularly evaluate the collectibility of loans receivable based on factors such as corporate and facility-level financial and operational reports, compliance with financial covenants set forth in the applicable loan agreement, the financial strength of the borrower and any guarantor, the payment history of the borrower and current economic conditions. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due under the terms of the applicable loan agreement, we provide a reserve against the portion of the receivable that we estimate may not be collected.
Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with a maturity date of three months or less when purchased. These investments are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.

91

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Escrow Deposits and Restricted Cash
Escrow deposits consist of amounts held by us or our lenders to provide for future real estate tax, insurance expenditures and tenant improvements related to our properties and operations. Restricted cash represents amounts paid to us for security deposits and other similar purposes.
Deferred Financing Costs
We amortize deferred financing costs, which are reported within senior notes payable and other debt on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, as a component of interest expense over the terms of the related borrowings using a method that approximates a level yield. Amortized costs of approximately $18.7 million, $16.9 million and $13.5 million were included in interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Marketable Debt and Equity Securities
We record marketable debt and equity securities as available-for-sale and classify them as a component of other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets (other than our interests in government-sponsored pooled loan investments, which are classified as secured loans receivable and investments, net on our Consolidated Balance Sheets). We record these securities at fair value and include unrealized gains and losses recorded in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We report interest income, including discount or premium amortization, on marketable debt securities and gains or losses on securities sold, which are based on the specific identification method, in income from loans and investments in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Derivative Instruments
We recognize all derivative instruments in other assets or accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value as of the reporting date. We recognize changes in the fair value of derivative instruments in other expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income or accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, depending on the intended use of the derivative and our designation of the instrument.
We do not use our derivative financial instruments, including interest rate caps, interest rate swaps and foreign currency forward contracts, for trading or speculative purposes. Our foreign currency forward contracts and certain of our interest rate swaps (including the interest rate swap contracts of unconsolidated joint ventures) are designated as effectively hedging the variability of expected cash flows related to their underlying securities and, therefore, also are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value, with changes in the fair value of these instruments recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize our proportionate share of the change in fair value of swap contracts of our unconsolidated joint ventures in accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Certain of our other interest rate swaps and rate caps were not designated as having a hedging relationship with the underlying securities and therefore do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting under GAAP. Accordingly, these interest rate swaps are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value, and we recognize changes in the fair value of these instruments in current earnings (in other expenses) in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Fair Values of Financial Instruments
Fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement, and we determine fair value based on the assumptions that we expect market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within levels one and two of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within level three of the hierarchy).
Level one inputs utilize unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that we have the ability to access. Level two inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in level one that are directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability. Level two inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and other inputs for the asset or liability that are observable at commonly quoted intervals, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates and yield curves. Level three inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which typically are based on our own assumptions, because there is little, if any, related market activity. If the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the entire fair value measurement falls is the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. If the volume and level of market activity for an asset or liability has decreased significantly relative to the normal market activity for such asset or liability (or similar assets or liabilities), then transactions or quoted prices may not accurately reflect fair value. In addition, if there is evidence that a transaction for an asset or liability is not orderly, little, if any, weight is placed on that transaction price as an

92

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


indicator of fair value. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
We use the following methods and assumptions in estimating the fair value of our financial instruments.
Cash and cash equivalents - The carrying amount of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.
Escrow deposits and restricted cash - The carrying amount of escrow deposits and restricted cash reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.
Loans receivable - We estimate the fair value of loans receivable using level two and level three inputs: we discount future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar loans with the same terms and length to maturity would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings.
Marketable debt securities - We estimate the fair value of corporate bonds using level two inputs: we observe quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets that we have the ability to access. We estimate the fair value of certain government-sponsored pooled loan investments using level three inputs: we consider credit spreads, underlying asset performance and credit quality, default rates and any other applicable criteria.
Derivative instruments - With the assistance of a third party, we estimate the fair value of derivative instruments, including interest rate caps, interest rate swaps, and foreign currency forward contracts using level two inputs: for interest rate caps, we observe forward yield curves and other relevant information; for interest rate swaps, we observe alternative financing rates derived from market-based financing rates, forward yield curves and discount rates; and for foreign currency forward contracts, we estimate the future values of the two currency tranches using forward exchange rates that are based on traded forward points and calculate a present value of the net amount using a discount factor based on observable traded interest rates.
Senior notes payable and other debt - We estimate the fair value of senior notes payable and other debt using level two inputs: we discount the future cash flows using current interest rates at which we could obtain similar borrowings. For mortgage debt, we may estimate fair value using level three inputs.
Redeemable OP unitholder interests - We estimate the fair value of our redeemable OP unitholder interests using level one inputs: we base fair value on the closing price of our common stock, as OP Units may be redeemed at the election of the holder for cash or, at our option, shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances.
Revenue Recognition
Triple-Net Leased Properties and MOB Operations
Certain of our triple-net leases and most of our MOB leases provide for periodic and determinable increases in base rent. We recognize base rental revenues under these leases on a straight-line basis over the applicable lease term when collectability is reasonably assured. Recognizing rental income on a straight-line basis generally results in recognized revenues during the first half of a lease term exceeding the cash amounts contractually due from our tenants, creating a straight-line rent receivable that is included in other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, this cumulative excess totaled $219.1 million (net of allowances of $101.4 million) and $187.6 million (net of allowances of $83.5 million), respectively (excluding properties classified as held for sale).
Certain of our leases provide for periodic increases in base rent only if certain revenue parameters or other substantive contingencies are met. We recognize the increased rental revenue under these leases as the related parameters or contingencies are met, rather than on a straight-line basis over the applicable lease term.
Senior Living Operations
We recognize resident fees and services, other than move-in fees, monthly as services are provided. We recognize move-in fees on a straight-line basis over the average resident stay. Our lease agreements with residents generally have terms of 12 to 18 months and are cancelable by the resident upon 30 days’ notice.
Other
We recognize interest income from loans and investments, including discounts and premiums, using the effective interest method when collectibility is reasonably assured. We apply the effective interest method on a loan-by-loan basis and recognize discounts and premiums as yield adjustments over the related loan term. We recognize interest income on an impaired loan to

93

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


the extent our estimate of the fair value of the collateral is sufficient to support the balance of the loan, other receivables and all related accrued interest. When the balance of the loan, other receivables and all related accrued interest is equal to or less than our estimate of the fair value of the collateral, we recognize interest income on a cash basis. We provide a reserve against an impaired loan to the extent our total investment in the loan exceeds our estimate of the fair value of the loan collateral.
We recognize income from rent, lease termination fees, development services, management advisory services, and all other income when all of the following criteria are met in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin 104: (i) the applicable agreement has been fully executed and delivered; (ii) services have been rendered; (iii) the amount is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured.
Allowances
We assess the collectibility of our rent receivables, including straight-line rent receivables. We base our assessment of the collectibility of rent receivables (other than straight-line rent receivables) on several factors, including, among other things, payment history, the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, the value of the underlying collateral, if any, and current economic conditions. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is probable that we will be unable to recover the full value of the receivable, we provide a reserve against the portion of the receivable that we estimate may not be recovered. We also base our assessment of the collectibility of straight-line rent receivables on several factors, including, among other things, the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, the historical operations and operating trends of the property, the historical payment pattern of the tenant and the type of property. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is probable that we will be unable to receive the rent payments due in the future, we provide a reserve against the recognized straight-line rent receivable asset for the portion, up to its full value, that we estimate may not be recovered. If we change our assumptions or estimates regarding the collectibility of future rent payments required by a lease, we may adjust our reserve to increase or reduce the rental revenue recognized in the period we make such change in our assumptions or estimates.
Stock-Based Compensation
We recognize share-based payments to employees and directors, including grants of stock options, included in General, administrative and professional fees in our Consolidated Statements of Income generally on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period based on the grant date fair value of the award.
Gain on Sale of Assets
We recognize sales of assets only upon the closing of the transaction with the purchaser. We record payments received from purchasers prior to closing as deposits and classify them as other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize gains (net of any taxes) on assets sold using the full accrual method upon closing if the collectibility of the sales price is reasonably assured, we are not obligated to perform any significant activities after the sale to earn the profit, we have received adequate initial investment from the purchaser, and other profit recognition criteria have been satisfied. We may defer recognition of gains in whole or in part until: (i) the profit is determinable, meaning that the collectibility of the sales price is reasonably assured or the amount that will not be collectible can be estimated; and (ii) the earnings process is virtually complete, meaning that we are not obliged to perform any significant activities after the sale to earn the profit.
Federal Income Tax
We have elected to be treated as a REIT under the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), for every year beginning with the year ended December 31, 1999. Accordingly, we generally are not subject to federal income tax on net income that we distribute to our stockholders, provided that we continue to qualify as a REIT. However, with respect to certain of our subsidiaries that have elected to be treated as “taxable REIT subsidiaries,” we record income tax expense or benefit, as those entities are subject to federal income tax similar to regular corporations. Certain foreign subsidiaries are subject to foreign income tax, although they did not elect to be treated as TRSs.
We account for deferred income taxes using the asset and liability method and recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in our financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, we determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Any increase or decrease in the deferred tax liability that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes us to change our judgment about expected future tax consequences of events, is included in the tax provision when such changes occur. Deferred income taxes also reflect the impact of operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance is provided if we believe it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Any increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes us to change our judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset, is included in the tax provision when such changes occur.

94

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We recognize interest and penalties, if applicable, related to uncertain tax positions as part of income tax benefit (expense).
Foreign Currency
Certain of our subsidiaries’ functional currencies are the local currencies of their respective foreign jurisdictions. We translate the results of operations of our foreign subsidiaries into U.S. dollars using average rates of exchange in effect during the period, and we translate balance sheet accounts using exchange rates in effect at the end of the period. We record resulting currency translation adjustments in accumulated other comprehensive income, a component of stockholders’ equity, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, and we record foreign currency transaction gains and losses in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Segment Reporting
As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, we operated through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties; senior living operations; and MOB operations. In our triple-net leased properties segment, we invest in seniors housing and healthcare properties throughout the United States and the United Kingdom and lease those properties to healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses. In our senior living operations segment, we invest in seniors housing communities throughout the United States and Canada and engage independent operators, such as Atria and Sunrise, to manage those communities. In our MOB operations segment, we primarily acquire, own, develop, lease, and manage MOBs throughout the United States. See “Note 20—Segment Information.”
Operating Leases
We account for payments made pursuant to operating leases in our Consolidated Statements of Income based on actual rent paid, plus or minus a straight-line rent adjustment for leases that provide for periodic and determinable increases in base rent.
Recently Issued or Adopted Accounting Standards
In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (“ASU 2015-03”), which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected. Also in August 2015, the FASB issues ASU 2015-15, Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated With Line-of-Credit Arrangements (“ASU 2015-15”) which clarifies the SEC staff’s position not objecting to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing such costs, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. We adopted ASU 2015-03 and 2015-15 during 2015. There were deferred financing costs of $69.1 million and $60.3 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively that are now classified within senior notes payable and other debt on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments (“ASU 2015-16”) to simplify the accounting for business combinations, specifically as it relates to measurement-period adjustments. Acquiring entities in a business combination must recognize measurement-period adjustments in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. Also, ASU 2015-16 requires entities to present separately on the face of the income statement (or disclose in the notes to the financial statements) the portion of the amount recorded in the current period earnings, by line item, that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. ASU 2015-16 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2016 and is to be applied prospectively to measurement-period adjustments that occur after the effective date. We do not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue From Contracts With Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which outlines a comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. ASU 2014-09 states that “an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.” While ASU 2014-09 specifically references contracts with customers, it may apply to certain other transactions such as the sale of real estate or equipment. In 2015, the FASB provided for a one-year deferral of the effective date for ASU

95

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


2014-09 which is now effective for us beginning January 1, 2018. We are continuing to evaluate this guidance; however, we do not expect its adoption to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements, as a substantial portion of our revenue consists of rental income from leasing arrangements, which are specifically excluded from ASU 2014-09.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis (“ASU 2015-02”), which makes certain changes to both the variable interest model and the voting model, including changes to (1) the identification of variable interests (fees paid to a decision maker or service provider), (2) the variable interest entity characteristics for a limited partnership or similar entity and (3) the primary beneficiary determination. ASU 2015-02 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2016. We are continuing to evaluate this guidance; however, we do not expect its adoption to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Note 3—Concentration of Credit Risk
As of December 31, 2015, Atria, Sunrise, Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred and Ardent managed or operated approximately 22.5%, 11.7%, 8.5%, 2.1% and 5.3%, respectively, of our real estate investments based on gross book value (excluding properties classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2015). Seniors housing communities constituted approximately 65.2% of our real estate investments based on gross book value (excluding properties classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2015), while MOBs, skilled nursing facilities, specialty hospitals and general acute care hospitals collectively comprised the remaining 34.8% Our properties were located in 46 states, the District of Columbia, seven Canadian provinces and the United Kingdom as of December 31, 2015, with properties in one state (California) accounting for more than 10% of our total revenues and total net operating income (“NOI,” which is defined as total revenues, excluding interest and other income, less property-level operating expenses and medical office building services costs) (in each case excluding amounts in discontinued operations) for each of the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
Triple-Net Leased Properties
For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, approximately 5.3%, 6.1% and 6.2%, respectively, of our total revenues and 9.3%, 10.9% and 11.2%, respectively, of our total NOI (in each case excluding amounts in discontinued operations) were derived from our lease agreements with Brookdale Senior Living. For the same periods, approximately 5.6%, 5.9% and 6.2%, respectively, of our total revenues and 9.8%, 10.6% and 11.2%, respectively, of our total NOI (in each case excluding amounts in discontinued operations) were derived from our lease agreements with Kindred. As a result of our 2015 acquisition of Ardent Medical Services, Inc. (“AHS”) and simultaneous separation and sale of Ardent, for the year ended December 31, 2015, approximately 1.3% of our total revenues and 2.3% of our total NOI (in each case excluding amounts in discontinued operations) were derived from our lease agreements with Ardent. Each of our leases with Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred and Ardent is a triple-net lease that obligates the tenant to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures, and to comply with the terms of the mortgage financing documents, if any, affecting the properties. In addition, each of our Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred and Ardent leases has a corporate guaranty. Brookdale Senior Living and Kindred have multiple leases with us and those leases contain cross-default provisions tied to each other, as well as bundled lease renewals (as described in more detail below).
The properties we lease to Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred and Ardent accounted for a significant portion of our triple-net leased properties segment revenues and NOI for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013. If either Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred or Ardent becomes unable or unwilling to satisfy its obligations to us or to renew its leases with us upon expiration of the terms thereof, our financial condition and results of operations could decline and our ability to service our indebtedness and to make distributions to our stockholders could be impaired. We cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred and Ardent will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable them to satisfy their respective obligations to us, and any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred or Ardent to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity, our ability to service our indebtedness and other obligations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders, as required for us to continue to qualify as a REIT (a “Material Adverse Effect”). We also cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred and Ardent will elect to renew their respective leases with us upon expiration of the leases or that we will be able to reposition any non-renewed properties on a timely basis or on the same or better economic terms, if at all.
In December 2014, we entered into favorable agreements with Kindred to transition or sell the operations of nine licensed healthcare assets, make modifications to the master leases governing 34 leased assets, and reimburse us for certain deferred capital expenditures at skilled nursing facilities previously transferred to new operators. In January 2015, Kindred paid us $37

96

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


million in connection with these agreements, which is being amortized over the remaining lease term for the 34 assets governed by the modified master leases. We own or have the rights to all licenses and CONs at the nine properties to be transitioned or sold, and Kindred has extensive and detailed obligations to cooperate and ensure an orderly transition of the properties to another operator. As of December 31, 2015, four of the nine properties have been sold and three of the nine properties were disposed of as part of the CCP Spin-Off, and one property was sold subsequent to December 31, 2015.
The following table sets forth the future contracted minimum rentals, excluding contingent rent escalations, but including straight-line rent adjustments where applicable, for all of our triple-net and MOB leases as of December 31, 2015 (excluding properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and properties classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2015):
 
Brookdale
Senior
Living
 
Kindred
 
Other
 
Total
 
(In thousands)
2016
$
160,597

 
$
186,137

 
$
889,053

 
$
1,235,787

2017
160,138

 
186,390

 
830,679

 
1,177,207

2018
159,864

 
152,613

 
772,267

 
1,084,744

2019
149,361

 
135,803

 
727,235

 
1,012,399

2020
33,963

 
114,895

 
688,204

 
837,062

Thereafter
23,500

 
401,088

 
4,916,928

 
5,341,516

Total
$
687,423

 
$
1,176,926

 
$
8,824,366

 
$
10,688,715

Senior Living Operations
As of December 31, 2015, Atria and Sunrise, collectively, provided comprehensive property management and accounting services with respect to 268 of our 304 seniors housing communities, for which we pay annual management fees pursuant to long-term management agreements.
Because Atria and Sunrise manage our properties in exchange for the receipt of a management fee from us, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants. However, we rely on our managers’ personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations efficiently and effectively. We also rely on our managers to set appropriate resident fees and otherwise operate our seniors housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, including various rights to terminate and exercise remedies under the agreements as provided therein, Atria’s or Sunrise’s failure, inability or unwillingness to satisfy its respective obligations under those agreements, to efficiently and effectively manage our properties or to provide timely and accurate accounting information with respect thereto could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. In addition, significant changes in Atria’s or Sunrise’s senior management or equity ownership or any adverse developments in their businesses and affairs or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Our 34% ownership interest in Atria entitles us to certain rights and minority protections, as well as the right to appoint two of five members on the Atria board of directors.
Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred, Atria, Sunrise and Ardent Information
Each of Brookdale Senior Living and Kindred is subject to the reporting requirements of the SEC and is required to file with the SEC annual reports containing audited financial information and quarterly reports containing unaudited financial information. The information related to Brookdale Senior Living and Kindred contained or referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been derived from SEC filings made by Brookdale Senior Living or Kindred, as the case may be, or other publicly available information, or was provided to us by Brookdale Senior Living or Kindred, and we have not verified this information through an independent investigation or otherwise. We have no reason to believe that this information is inaccurate in any material respect, but we cannot assure you of its accuracy. We are providing this data for informational purposes only, and you are encouraged to obtain Brookdale Senior Living’s and Kindred’s publicly available filings, which can be found at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Atria, Sunrise and Ardent are not currently subject to the reporting requirements of the SEC. The information related to Atria, Sunrise and Ardent contained or referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been derived from publicly available information or was provided to us by Atria, Sunrise or Ardent, as the case may be, and we have not verified this

97

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


information through an independent investigation or otherwise. We have no reason to believe that this information is inaccurate in any material respect, but we cannot assure you of its accuracy.
Note 4—Acquisitions of Real Estate Property
The following summarizes our acquisition and development activities during 2015, 2014 and 2013. We invest in seniors housing and healthcare properties primarily to achieve an expected yield on our investment, to grow and diversify our portfolio and revenue base, and to reduce our dependence on any single tenant, operator or manager, geographic location, asset type, business model or revenue source.
2015 Acquisitions
HCT Acquisition
In January 2015, we acquired HCT in a stock and cash transaction, which added 152 properties to our portfolio. At the effective time of the merger, each share of HCT common stock outstanding (other than shares held by us, HCT or our respective subsidiaries, which shares were canceled) was converted into the right to receive either 0.1688 shares of our common stock (with cash paid in lieu of fractional shares) or $11.33 per share in cash, at the election of each HCT shareholder. Shares of HCT common stock for which a valid election was not made were converted into the stock consideration. We funded the transaction through the issuance of approximately 28.4 million shares of our common stock and 1.1 million limited partnership units that are redeemable for shares of our common stock and the payment of approximately $11 million in cash (excluding cash in lieu of fractional shares). In addition, we assumed $167 million of mortgage debt and repaid approximately $730 million of debt, net of HCT cash on hand. In August 2015, 20 of the properties that we acquired in the HCT acquisition were disposed of as part of the CCP Spin-Off.
Ardent Health Services Acquisition
On August 4, 2015, we completed our acquisition of Ardent Medical Services, Inc. and simultaneous separation and sale of the Ardent hospital operating company to a consortium composed of an entity controlled by Equity Group Investments, Ardent’s management team and us (collectively the “Ardent Transaction”). As of the acquisition date, we recorded the estimated fair value of our investment in owned hospital and other real estate of approximately $1.3 billion. At closing, we paid $26.3 million for our 9.9% interest in Ardent which represents our estimate of the acquisition date fair value of this interest. Upon closing, we entered into a long-term triple-net master lease with Ardent to operate the ten hospital campuses and other real estate we acquired.
Other 2015 Acquisitions
In 2015, we made other investments totaling approximately $612 million, including the acquisition of eleven triple-net
leased properties; eleven MOBs (including eight MOBs that we had previously accounted for as investments in unconsolidated entities; see “Note 7—Investments in Unconsolidated Entities.”) and 12 skilled nursing facilities (all of which were disposed of as part of the CCP Spin-Off).
Completed Developments
During 2015, we completed the development of one triple-net leased seniors housing community, representing $9.3 million of net real estate property on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2015.

98

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Estimated Fair Value
We are accounting for our 2015 acquisitions under the acquisition method in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). Our initial accounting for the acquisitions completed during 2015 remains subject to further adjustment. The following table summarizes the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which we determined using level two and level three inputs:
 
Triple-Net Leased Properties
 
Senior Living Operations
 
MOB Operations
 
Total
 
(In thousands)
Land and improvements
$
190,566

 
$
70,713

 
$
173,307

 
$
434,586

Buildings and improvements
1,724,812

 
703,080

 
1,214,403

 
3,642,295

Acquired lease intangibles
169,362

 
83,867

 
184,540

 
437,769

Other assets
173,232

 
272,888

 
403,046

 
849,166

Total assets acquired
2,257,972

 
1,130,548

 
1,975,296

 
5,363,816

Notes payable and other debt

 
77,940

 
99,917

 
177,857

Other liabilities
43,811

 
45,408

 
46,734

 
135,953

Total liabilities assumed
43,811

 
123,348

 
146,651

 
313,810

Net assets acquired
2,214,161

 
1,007,200

 
1,828,645

 
4,961,921

Redeemable OP unitholder interests assumed
 
 
 
 
 
 
88,085

Cash acquired
 
 
 
 
 
 
59,584

Equity issued
 
 
 
 
 
 
2,216,355

Total cash used
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
2,685,982

For certain acquisitions, the determination of fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed has changed and is subject to further adjustment. We made certain adjustments during 2015, including the fourth quarter, due primarily to reclassification adjustments for presentation and adjustments to our valuation assumptions. The changes to our valuation assumptions were based on more accurate information concerning the subject assets and liabilities. None of these changes had a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Included in other assets above is $746.9 million of goodwill, which represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. A substantial amount of this goodwill was due to an increase in our stock price between the announcement date and closing dates of the HCT acquisition. Goodwill has been allocated to our reportable business segments based on the respective fair value of the net assets acquired, as follows: triple-net leased properties - $133.6 million; senior living operations - $219.1 million; and MOB operations - $394.2 million.
Aggregate Revenue and NOI
For the year ended December 31, 2015, aggregate revenue and NOI derived from our 2015 real estate acquisitions during our period of ownership were $327.0 million and $201.9 million, respectively, excluding revenue and NOI for any assets contributed in the CCP Spin-Off.
Transaction Costs
Transaction costs are expensed as incurred and included in merger-related expenses and deal costs in our Consolidated Statements of Income. For the years ending December 31, 2015 and 2014, we expensed as incurred, $99.0 million and $10.8 million, respectively, costs related to our completed 2015 transactions, $4.1 million and $1.4 million of which are reported within discontinued operations. These transaction costs exclude any separation costs associated with the CCP Spin-Off (refer to “Note 5 - Dispositions”).

99

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Unaudited Pro Forma
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if we had consummated the HCT acquisition and Ardent Transaction as of January 1, 2014 and excludes assets that were acquired in the HCT acquisition but subsequently disposed of as part of the CCP Spin-Off.
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2015
 
2014
 
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues
$
3,361,658

 
$
3,164,100

Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders, including real estate dispositions
$
475,017

 
$
465,671

Earnings per common share:
 
 
 
Basic:
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders, including real estate dispositions
$
1.44

 
$
1.44

Diluted:
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders, including real estate dispositions
$
1.42

 
$
1.43

Weighted average shares used in computing earnings per common share:
 
 
 
Basic
330,311

 
322,590

Diluted
334,007

 
326,210

Acquisition-related costs related to the HCT acquisition and the Ardent Transaction are not expected to have a continuing impact and therefore have been excluded from these pro forma results. The pro forma results also do not include the impact of any synergies that may be achieved in the HCT acquisition and the Ardent Transaction, any lower costs of borrowing resulting from the acquisition or any strategies that management may consider in order to continue to efficiently manage our operations, nor do they give pro forma effect to any other acquisitions, dispositions or capital markets transactions that we completed during the periods presented. These pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that would have been obtained had the HCT acquisition and Ardent Transaction occurred at the beginning of the periods presented, nor are they necessarily indicative of future operating results.
2014 Acquisitions
Holiday Canada Acquisition
In August 2014, we acquired 29 seniors housing communities located in Canada from Holiday Retirement (the “Holiday Canada Acquisition”) for a purchase price of CAD 957.0 million. We also paid CAD 26.9 million in costs relating to the early repayment of debt at closing. We funded the Holiday Canada Acquisition initially through borrowings under a CAD 791.0 million unsecured term loan that we incurred in July 2014 (and subsequently repaid primarily through a private placement of senior notes in Canada) and the assumption of CAD 193.7 million of debt.
Other 2014 Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 2014, we also acquired three triple-net leased private hospitals (located in the United Kingdom), 26 triple-net leased seniors housing communities and four seniors housing communities that are being operated by independent third-party managers for aggregate consideration of approximately $812.0 million. We also paid $18.8 million in costs relating to the early repayment of debt at closing of the applicable transactions. In addition, we acquired a construction design, planning and consulting business to complement our MOB operations through the issuance of 148,241 shares of our common stock.
Completed Developments
During 2014, we completed the development of two MOBs and one seniors housing community, representing $41.2 million of net real estate property on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014.

100

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Estimated Fair Value
We are accounting for our 2014 acquisitions under the acquisition method in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). The following table summarizes the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in our 2014 real estate acquisitions, which we determined using level two and level three inputs:
 
Triple-Net Leased Properties
 
Senior Living Operations
 
Total
 
(In thousands)
Land and improvements
$
45,586

 
$
100,281

 
$
145,867

Buildings and improvements
546,849

 
1,081,630

 
1,628,479

Acquired lease intangibles
28,883

 
36,452

 
65,335

Other assets
227

 
12,394

 
12,621

Total assets acquired
621,545

 
1,230,757

 
1,852,302

Notes payable and other debt
12,927

 
228,150

 
241,077

Other liabilities
8,609

 
124,468

 
133,077

Total liabilities assumed
21,536

 
352,618

 
374,154

Net assets acquired
600,009

 
878,139

 
1,478,148

Cash acquired
227

 
8,704

 
8,931

Total cash used
$
599,782

 
$
869,435

 
$
1,469,217

Aggregate Revenue and NOI
For the year ended December 31, 2014, aggregate revenues and NOI derived from our 2014 real estate acquisitions (for our period of ownership) were $75.9 million and $41.5 million, respectively.
Transaction Costs
As of December 31, 2014, we had incurred a total of $26.2 million of acquisition-related costs related to our completed 2014 acquisitions, all of which were expensed as incurred and included in merger-related expenses and deal costs in our Consolidated Statements of Income for the applicable periods. For the year ended December 31, 2014, we expensed $23.8 million of these acquisition-related costs related to our completed 2014 acquisitions.
2013 Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 2013, we acquired 27 triple-net leased seniors housing communities, 24 seniors housing communities that are being operated by independent third-party managers (eight of which we previously leased pursuant to a capital lease) and 11 MOBs for aggregate consideration of approximately $1.8 billion.
Completed Developments
During the year ended December 31, 2013, we completed the development of two seniors housing communities, one MOB, and one hospital, representing $65.5 million of net real estate property on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013.

101

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Estimated Fair Value
We accounted for our 2013 acquisitions under the acquisition method in accordance with ASC 805. We accounted for the acquisition of the eight seniors housing communities that we previously leased pursuant to a capital lease in accordance with ASC Topic 840, Leases. The following table summarizes the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in our 2013 real estate acquisitions, which we determined using level two and level three inputs:
 
Triple-Net Leased Properties
 
Senior Living Operations (1)
 
MOB Operations
 
Total
 
(In thousands)
Land and improvements
$
51,419

 
$
45,566

 
$
3,923

 
$
100,908

Buildings and improvements
803,227

 
579,577

 
138,792

 
1,521,596

Acquired lease intangibles
8,945

 
16,920

 
10,362

 
36,227

Other assets
3,285

 
2,607

 
2,453

 
8,345

Total assets acquired
866,876

 
644,670

 
155,530

 
1,667,076

Notes payable and other debt
36,300

 
5,136

 

 
41,436

Other liabilities
11,423

 
12,285

 
6,510

 
30,218

Total liabilities assumed
47,723

 
17,421

 
6,510

 
71,654

Noncontrolling interest assumed
10,113

 

 
1,672

 
11,785

Net assets acquired
809,040

 
627,249

 
147,348

 
1,583,637

Cash acquired
753

 

 
1,397

 
2,150

Total cash used
$
808,287

 
$
627,249

 
$
145,951

 
$
1,581,487

________________
(1) Includes settlement of a $142.2 million capital lease obligation related to eight seniors housing communities.
Note 5—Dispositions
CCP Spin-Off
On August 17, 2015, we completed the CCP Spin-Off. In connection with the CCP Spin-Off, we disposed of 355 high-quality triple-net leased skilled nursing facilities and other healthcare assets operated by private regional and local care providers. The CCP Spin-Off was effectuated through a distribution of the common shares of CCP to holders of our common stock as of the distribution record date, and qualified as a tax-free distribution to our stockholders. For every four shares of Ventas common stock held as of the distribution record date of August 10, 2015, Ventas stockholders received one CCP common share on August 17, 2015. On August 17, 2015, just prior to the effective time of the spin-off, CCP (as our then wholly owned subsidiary) received approximately $1.4 billion of proceeds from a recently completed term loan and revolving credit facility. CCP paid us a distribution of $1.3 billion from these proceeds. We used this distribution from CCP to pay down our existing debt ($1.1 billion) and to pay for a portion of our quarterly installment of dividends to our stockholders ($0.2 billion).
The historical results of operations of the CCP properties as well as the related assets and liabilities have been presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. Discontinued operations also include separation costs incurred to complete the CCP Spin-Off of $42.3 million and $0.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Separation costs for 2015 include $3.5 million of stock-based compensation expense representing the incremental fair value of previously vested stock-based compensation awards as of the spin date. In addition, the assets and liabilities of CCP are presented separately from assets and liabilities from continuing operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows include within operating, investing and financing cash flows those activities which related to our period of ownership of the CCP properties.

102

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The following is a summary of the assets and liabilities of CCP at the CCP Spin-Off date (dollars in thousands):
 
August 17, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
 
(In thousands)
Assets:
 
 
 
Net real estate investments
$
2,588,255

 
$
2,274,310

Cash and cash equivalents
1,749

 
2,710

Goodwill
135,446

 
88,959

Assets held for sale
7,610

 
8,435

Other assets
15,089

 
16,596

Total assets
2,748,149

 
2,391,010

 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts payable and other liabilities
217,760

 
204,359

Liabilities related to assets held for sale
985

 
1,288

Total liabilities
218,745

 
205,647

 
 
 
 
Net assets:
$
2,529,404

 
$
2,185,363

 
 
 
 
Summarized financial information for CCP discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 respectively is as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
196,848

 
$
295,767

 
$
291,524

Income from loans and investments
2,148

 
3,392

 
3,783

Interest and other income
63

 
2

 
25

 
199,059

 
299,161

 
295,332

Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
Interest
61,613

 
87,648

 
89,602

Depreciation and amortization
79,479

 
101,760

 
94,606

General, administrative and professional fees
9

 
9

 
25

Merger-related expenses and deal costs
46,402

 
1,746

 

Other
1,332

 
13,184

 
1,368

 
188,835

 
204,347

 
185,601

Income before real estate dispositions and noncontrolling interest
10,224

 
94,814

 
109,731

Gain (loss) on real estate dispositions

 

 

Net income from discontinued operations
10,224

 
94,814

 
109,731

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
120

 
185

 
220

Net income from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders
$
10,104

 
$
94,629

 
$
109,511


Capital and development project expenditures relating to CCP for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 were $21.8 million, $17.2 million and 10.2 million, respectively. Other than capital and development project expenditures there were no other significant non-cash operating or investing activities relating CCP.
We and CCP entered into a transition services agreement prior to the CCP Spin-Off pursuant to which we and our subsidiaries provide to CCP, on an interim, transitional basis, various services. The services provided include information

103

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


technology, accounting and tax services. The overall fee charged by us for such services (the "Service Fee") is $2.5 million for one year. Through December 31, 2015, we recognized income of $0.9 million, relating to the Service Fee, which is payable in four quarterly installments. The transition services agreement will terminate on the expiration of the term of the last service provided under the agreement, which will be on or prior to August 31, 2016.
Discontinued Operations - Other than CCP Spin-Off
In addition to the amounts reported within discontinued operations relating to the CCP Spin-Off, we reported net income from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders of $1.0 million, $5.1 million, and $30.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
As of December 31, 2015, all properties whose results are presented within discontinued operations have been sold.
2015 Activity
During 2015, we sold 39 triple-net leased properties and 26 MOBs for aggregate consideration of $541.0 million, including lease termination fees of $6.0 million (included within triple-net leased rental income in our Consolidated Statements of Income). We recognized a gain on the sales of these assets of $46.3 million (net of taxes), of which $27.4 million is being deferred due to one secured loan ($78.4 million) and one non-mortgage loan ($20.0 million) we made to the buyers in connection with the sales of certain assets. These deferred gains will be recognized into income as principal payments are made on the loans over their respective terms.
Subsequent to December 31, 2015 we sold one triple-net leased property, one seniors housing community included in our seniors housing operations reportable business segment and one MOB for aggregate consideration of $54.5 million and we estimate recognizing gains on the sales of these assets of $26.9 million.
2014 Activity
During 2014, we sold 16 triple-net leased properties, two seniors housing communities included in our seniors housing operations reportable business segment and four properties included in our MOB operations reportable business segment for aggregate consideration of $118.2 million. We recognized a net gain on the sales of these assets of $21.3 million, $1.5 million of which is reported within discontinued operations in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
2013 Activity
During 2013, we sold 19 triple-net leased properties, one seniors housing community included in our senior living operations reportable business segment and two properties included in our MOB operations reportable business segment for aggregate consideration of $35.1 million, including lease termination fees of $0.3 million. We recognized a net gain on the sales of these assets of $5.0 million, all of which is reported within discontinued operations in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Assets Held for Sale
The table below summarizes our real estate assets classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, including the amounts reported within other assets and accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 
 
December 31, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
 
 
Number of Properties Held for Sale
 
Assets Held for Sale
 
Liabilities Held for Sale
 
Number of Properties Held for Sale (2)
 
Assets Held for Sale
 
Liabilities Held for Sale
 
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Triple-net leased properties
 
2

 
$
4,488

 
$
44

 
333

 
$
2,410,840

 
$
205,931

MOB operations (1)
 
8

 
68,619

 
24,759

 
32

 
144,482

 
32,042

Seniors living operations
 
1

 
19,953

 
9,537

 

 

 

Total
 
11

 
$
93,060

 
$
34,340

 
365

 
$
2,555,322

 
$
237,973

 
 
 
 
(1)
Four MOBs previously reported as held for sale (and discontinued operations) were classified as held and used (and part of continuing operations) as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
(2)
December 31, 2014 includes 323 properties disposed of as part of the CCP Spin-Off. Also included are loans, goodwill and other assets and liabilities contributed to CCP.

104

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Real Estate Impairment

We recognized impairments of $42.2 million, $56.6 million and $51.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 respectively, which are recorded primarily as a component of depreciation and amortization and relate primarily to our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment. Of these impairments, $8.9 million, $13.2 million and $41.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 respectively were reported in discontinued operations in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Our recorded impairments were primarily the result of a change in our intent to hold the impaired assets. In each case, we recognized an impairment in the periods in which our change in intent was made.
Note 6—Loans Receivable and Investments
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, we had $895.0 million and $896.5 million, respectively, of net loans receivable and investments relating to seniors housing and healthcare operators or properties. The following is a summary of our net loans receivable and investments as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, including amortized cost, fair value and unrealized gains on available-for-sale investments:
 
 
December 31, 2015
 
 
Carrying Amount
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
 
Unrealized Gain (Loss)
 
 
(In thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Secured mortgage loans and other
 
$
793,433

 
$
793,433

 
$
816,849

 
$

Government-sponsored pooled loan investments (1)
 
63,679

 
62,130

 
63,679

 
1,549

Total investments reported as Secured loans receivable and investments, net
 
857,112

 
855,563

 
880,528

 
1,549

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-mortgage loans receivable
 
37,926

 
37,926

 
38,806

 

Total investments reported as Other assets
 
37,926

 
37,926

 
38,806

 

Total net loans receivable and investments
 
$
895,038

 
$
893,489

 
$
919,334

 
$
1,549

(1) Investments in government-sponsored pooled loans have contractual maturity dates in 2022 and 2023.
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
 
Carrying Amount
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
 
Unrealized Gain (Loss)
 
 
(In thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Secured mortgage loans and other
 
$
739,766

 
$
739,766

 
$
748,842

 
$

Government-sponsored pooled loan investments
 
63,115

 
61,377

 
63,115

 
1,738

Total investments reported as Secured loans receivable and investments, net
 
802,881

 
801,143

 
811,957

 
1,738

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-mortgage loans receivable
 
17,620

 
17,620

 
19,058

 

Marketable securities
 
76,046

 
71,000

 
76,046

 
5,046

Total investments reported as Other assets
 
93,666


88,620


95,104


5,046

Total net loans receivable and investments
 
$
896,547

 
$
889,763

 
$
907,061

 
$
6,784

2015 Activity

As discussed in Note 5 - Dispositions, we issued one secured loan ($78.4 million) and one non-mortgage loan ($20.0 million) to buyers in connection with the sales of certain assets. In June 2015 we sold our $71.0 million investment in senior unsecured corporate bonds for $76.8 million. We recognized a gain of $5.8 million that is included within income from loans and investments in our Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2015. This gain includes $5.0 million that was previously unrealized within accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014.


105

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


During the year ended December 31, 2015, we received aggregate proceeds of $97.0 million in final repayment of three secured and one non-mortgage loans receivable. We recognized gains aggregating $1.9 million on the repayment of these loans receivable that are recorded in income from loans and investments in our Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2015.

We disposed of two secured and seven non-mortgage loans receivable as part of the CCP Spin-Off having carrying amounts of $26.9 million and $4.2 million, respectively, as of the CCP Spin-Off date and carrying amounts of $26.9 million and $4.3 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2014. These loans are reported as assets held for sale on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014.

2014 Activity

During the year ended December 31, 2014, we made a $425.0 million secured mezzanine loan investment that has a blended annual interest rate of 8.1% and has contractual maturities ranging between 2016 and 2019, and we purchased $71.0 million principal amount of senior unsecured corporate bonds, a $38.7 million interest in a government-sponsored pooled loan investment, and $21.7 million of marketable equity securities. During the year ended December 31, 2014, we sold all of our marketable equity securities for $22.3 million and recognized a gain of $0.6 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, we received aggregate proceeds of $55.9 million in final repayment of three secured and two non-mortgage loans receivable. We recognized aggregate gains of $5.2 million on the repayment of these loans receivable that are recorded in income from loans and investments in our Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Note 7—Investments in Unconsolidated Entities
We report investments in unconsolidated entities over whose operating and financial policies we have the ability to exercise significant influence under the equity method of accounting. We are not required to consolidate these entities because our joint venture partners have significant participating rights, nor are these entities considered VIEs, as they are controlled by equity holders with sufficient capital. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, we had ownership interests (ranging from 5% to 25%) in joint ventures that owned 41 properties and 51 properties, respectively. We account for our interests in real estate joint ventures, as well as our 34% interest in Atria and 9.9% interest in Ardent (which are included within other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets), under the equity method of accounting.
With the exception of our interests in Atria and Ardent, we provide various services to each unconsolidated entity in exchange for fees and reimbursements. Total management fees earned in connection with these entities were $7.8 million, $8.4 million and $7.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively (which is included in medical office building and other services revenue in our Consolidated Statements of Income).
In October 2015, we acquired the 95% controlling interests in ten MOBs from a joint venture entity in which we have a 5% interest and that we account for as an equity method investment. In connection with this acquisition, we re-measured our previously held equity interest (associated with the acquired MOBs) and recognized a loss of $0.2 million, which is included in income from unconsolidated entities in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Since the acquisition, operations relating to these properties have been consolidated in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
In March 2013, we acquired two MOBs from a joint venture entity in which we have a 5% interest and that we account for as an equity method investment. In connection with this acquisition, we re-measured our previously held equity interest (associated with the acquired MOBs) and recognized a gain of $1.3 million, which is included in income from unconsolidated entities in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Since the acquisition, operations relating to these properties have been consolidated in our Consolidated Statements of Income.







106

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Note 8—Intangibles
The following is a summary of our intangibles as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:
 
December 31, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
 
Balance
 
Remaining
Weighted Average
Amortization
Period in Years
 
Balance
 
Remaining
Weighted Average
Amortization
Period in Years
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Intangible assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Above market lease intangibles
$
155,161

 
7.0
 
$
150,775

 
6.8
In-place and other lease intangibles
1,189,261

 
20.9
 
804,260

 
24.5
Goodwill
1,047,497

 
N/A
 
363,971

 
 N/A
Other intangibles
35,736

 
8.6
 
36,030

 
7.9
Accumulated amortization
(655,176
)
 
N/A
 
(515,603
)
 
 N/A
Net intangible assets
$
1,772,479

 
19.2
 
$
839,433

 
21.0
Intangible liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Below market lease intangibles
$
256,034

 
14.2
 
$
229,495

 
14.1
Other lease intangibles
35,925

 
30.1
 
32,103

 
26.1
Accumulated amortization
(113,647
)
 
N/A
 
(97,371
)
 
 N/A
Purchase option intangibles
3,568

 
N/A
 
13,549

 
 N/A
Net intangible liabilities
$
181,880

 
15.6
 
$
177,776

 
15.1
________
N/A—Not Applicable 
Above market lease intangibles and in-place and other lease intangibles are included in acquired lease intangibles within real estate investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Other intangibles (including non-compete agreements, trade names and trademarks) are included in other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Below market lease intangibles, other lease intangibles and purchase option intangibles are included in accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, our net amortization expense related to these intangibles was $142.7 million, $74.6 million and $77.0 million, respectively. The estimated net amortization expense related to these intangibles for each of the next five years is as follows: 2016$98.7 million; 2017$52.0 million; 2018$42.9 million; 2019$36.6 million; and 2020$33.9 million.
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill, by segment, for 2015 was as follows (in thousands):
 
 
Triple-Net Leased Properties
 
Senior Living Operations
 
MOB Operations
 
Total
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Goodwill as of December 31, 2014 (excluding held for sale)
 
$
327,232

 
$
41,741

 
$
83,958

 
$
452,931

Acquisitions
 
133,539

 
219,141

 
394,203

 
746,883

Partial disposal of reporting unit
 
(11,967
)
 

 
(3,861
)
 
(15,828
)
Goodwill allocated in the CCP Spin-Off
 
(135,446
)
 

 

 
(135,446
)
Currency translation adjustments and other
 
(1,043
)
 

 

 
(1,043
)
Goodwill as of December 31, 2015
 
$
312,315

 
$
260,882

 
$
474,300

 
$
1,047,497






107

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Note 9—Other Assets
The following is a summary of our other assets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:
 
2015
 
2014
 
(In thousands)
Straight-line rent receivables, net
$
219,064

 
$
187,572

Non-mortgage loans receivable, net
37,926

 
17,620

Other intangibles, net
13,224

 
19,122

Marketable securities

 
76,046

Other
142,189

 
151,398

Total other assets
$
412,403

 
$
451,758


108

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Note 10—Borrowing Arrangements
The following is a summary of our senior notes payable and other debt as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:
 
2015
 
2014
 
(In thousands)
Unsecured revolving credit facility (1)
$
180,683

 
$
919,099

3.125% Senior Notes due 2015

 
400,000

6% Senior Notes due 2015

 
234,420

1.55% Senior Notes due 2016
550,000

 
550,000

1.250% Senior Notes due 2017
300,000

 
300,000

2.00% Senior Notes due 2018
700,000

 
700,000

Unsecured term loan due 2018 (2)
200,000

 
200,000

Unsecured term loan due 2019 (2)
468,477

 
790,634

4.00% Senior Notes due 2019
600,000

 
600,000

3.00% Senior Notes, Series A due 2019 (3)
289,038

 
344,204

2.700% Senior Notes due 2020
500,000

 
500,000

Unsecured term loan due 2020
900,000

 

4.750% Senior Notes due 2021
700,000

 
700,000

4.25% Senior Notes due 2022
600,000

 
600,000

3.25% Senior Notes due 2022
500,000

 
500,000

3.300% Senior Notes due 2022 (3)
180,649

 

3.750% Senior Notes due 2024
400,000

 
400,000

4.125% Senior Notes, Series B due 2024 (3)
180,649

 
215,128

3.500% Senior Notes due 2025
600,000

 

4.125% Senior Notes due 2026
500,000

 

6.90% Senior Notes due 2037
52,400

 
52,400

6.59% Senior Notes due 2038
22,973

 
22,973

5.45% Senior Notes due 2043
258,750

 
258,750

5.70% Senior Notes due 2043
300,000

 
300,000

4.375% Senior Notes due 2045
300,000

 

Mortgage loans and other (4)
1,987,401

 
2,300,687

Total
11,271,020

 
10,888,295

Deferred financing costs, net
(69,121
)
 
(60,328
)
Unamortized fair value adjustment
33,570

 
42,516

Unamortized discounts
(28,473
)
 
(26,132
)
Senior notes payable and other debt
$
11,206,996

 
$
10,844,351

_______
(1)
$9.7 million and $164.1 million of aggregate borrowings are denominated in Canadian dollars as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
(2)
These amounts represent in aggregate the $668 million of unsecured term loan borrowings under our unsecured credit facility, of which $89.9 million included in the 2019 tranche is in the form of Canadian dollars.
(3)
These borrowings are in the form of Canadian dollars.
(4)
2015 and 2014 exclude $22.9 million and $27.6 million, respectively, of mortgage debt related to real estate assets classified as held for sale that is included in liabilities related to assets held for sale on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
    

109

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility and Unsecured Term Loans
Our unsecured credit facility is comprised of a $2.0 billion revolving credit facility priced at LIBOR plus 1.0% as of December 31, 2015, and a $200.0 million four-year term loan and an $800.0 million five-year term loan, each priced at LIBOR plus 1.05% as of December 31, 2015. The revolving credit facility matures in January 2018, but may be extended, at our option subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, for an additional period of one year. The $200.0 million and $800.0 million term loans mature in January 2018 and January 2019, respectively. The unsecured credit facility also includes an accordion feature that permits us to increase our aggregate borrowing capacity thereunder to up to $3.5 billion.
Our unsecured credit facility imposes certain customary restrictions on us, including restrictions pertaining to: (i) liens; (ii) investments; (iii) the incurrence of additional indebtedness; (iv) mergers and dissolutions; (v) certain dividend, distribution and other payments; (vi) permitted businesses; (vii) transactions with affiliates; (viii) agreements limiting certain liens; and (ix) the maintenance of certain consolidated total leverage, secured debt leverage, unsecured debt leverage and fixed charge coverage ratios and minimum consolidated adjusted net worth, and contains customary events of default.
As of December 31, 2015, we had $180.7 million of borrowings outstanding, $14.9 million of letters of credit outstanding and $1.8 billion of unused borrowing capacity available under our unsecured revolving credit facility.
In August 2015, we completed a $900 million five year term loan having a variable interest rate of LIBOR plus 97.5 basis points. The term loan matures in 2020.
Also in August 2015, we repaid $305.0 million of our unsecured term loan due 2019 and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $1.6 million representing a write-off of the then unamortized deferred financing fees.
In July 2014, we entered into a new CAD 791.0 million unsecured term loan to initially fund the Holiday Canada Acquisition. The term loan was scheduled to mature on July 30, 2015, but in September 2014, we repaid CAD 660.0 million of the unsecured term loan principally with proceeds from the sale of unsecured senior notes issued by our wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Canada Finance Limited, and in December 2014, we repaid in full the remaining borrowings outstanding under the term loan.
We recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 representing the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees as a result of the replacement of our previous unsecured revolving credit facility.
Senior Notes
As of December 31, 2015, we had outstanding $6.8 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by our subsidiary, Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership (“Ventas Realty”) ($3.9 billion of which was co-issued by Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation), approximately $75.4 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. (“NHP”) and assumed by our subsidiary, Nationwide Health Properties, LLC (“NHP LLC”), as successor to NHP, in connection with our acquisition of NHP, and CAD 900.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by our subsidiary, Ventas Canada Finance Limited. All of the senior notes issued by Ventas Realty and Ventas Canada Finance Limited are unconditionally guaranteed by Ventas, Inc.
In September 2015, we redeemed all $400.0 million principal amount then outstanding of our 3.125% senior notes due November 2015 at a redemption price equal to 100.7% of par, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $2.9 million.
In July 2015, we issued and sold $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.125% senior notes due 2026 at a public offering price equal to 99.218% of par, for total proceeds of $496.1 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.
In May 2015, we repaid in full, at par, $234.4 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 6% senior notes due 2015 upon maturity.
In January 2015, Ventas Realty issued and sold $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.500% senior notes due 2025 at a public offering price equal to 99.663% of par, for total proceeds of $598.0 million before the underwriting discount and expenses, and $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.375% senior notes due 2045 at a public offering price equal to 99.500% of par, for total proceeds of $298.5 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.
Also in January 2015, Ventas Canada Finance Limited issued and sold CAD 250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.30% senior notes, series C due 2022 at an offering price equal to 99.992% of par, for total proceeds of CAD 250.0 million before the agent fees and expenses. The notes were offered on a private placement basis in Canada.


110

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


In September 2014, Ventas Canada Finance Limited issued and sold CAD 400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.00% senior notes, series A due 2019 at an offering price equal to 99.713% of par, for total proceeds of CAD 398.9 million before the agent fees and expenses, and CAD 250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.125% senior notes, series B due 2024 at an offering price equal to 99.601% of par, for total proceeds of CAD 249.0 million before the agent fees and expenses. The notes were offered on a private placement basis in Canada.
In April 2014, Ventas Realty issued and sold $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 1.250% senior notes due 2017 at a public offering price equal to 99.815% of par, for total proceeds of $299.4 million before the underwriting discount and expenses, and $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.750% senior notes due 2024 at a public offering price equal to 99.304% of par, for total proceeds of $397.2 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.
In September 2013, Ventas Realty issued and sold: $550.0 million aggregate principal amount of 1.55% senior notes due 2016 at a public offering price equal to 99.910% of par, for total proceeds of $549.5 million before the underwriting discount and expenses; and $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.70% senior notes due 2043 at a public offering price equal to 99.628% of par, for total proceeds of $298.9 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.
In March 2013, Ventas Realty issued and sold: $258.8 million aggregate principal amount of 5.45% senior notes due 2043 at a public offering price equal to par, for total proceeds of $258.8 million before the underwriting discounts and expenses; and $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.700% senior notes due 2020 at a public offering price equal to 99.942% of par, for total proceeds of $499.7 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.
In February 2013, we repaid in full, at par, $270.0 million principal amount then outstanding of our 6.25% senior notes due 2013 upon maturity.
Ventas Realty’s senior notes are part of our and Ventas Realty’s general unsecured obligations, ranking equal in right of payment with all of our and Ventas Realty’s existing and future senior obligations and ranking senior in right of payment to all of our and Ventas Realty’s existing and future subordinated indebtedness. However, Ventas Realty’s senior notes are effectively subordinated to our and Ventas Realty’s secured indebtedness, if any, to the extent of the value of the assets securing that indebtedness. Ventas Realty’s senior notes are also structurally subordinated to the preferred equity and indebtedness, whether secured or unsecured, of our subsidiaries (other than Ventas Realty and, with respect to those senior notes co-issued by Ventas Capital Corporation, Ventas Capital Corporation).
Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s senior notes are part of our and Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s general unsecured obligations, ranking equal in right of payment with all of Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s existing and future subordinated indebtedness. However, Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s senior notes are effectively subordinated to our and Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s secured indebtedness, if any, to the extent of the value of the assets securing that indebtedness. Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s senior notes are also structurally subordinated to the preferred equity and indebtedness, whether secured or unsecured, of our subsidiaries (other than Ventas Canada Finance Limited).
NHP LLC’s senior notes are part of NHP LLC’s general unsecured obligations, ranking equal in right of payment with all of NHP LLC’s existing and future senior obligations and ranking senior to all of NHP LLC’s existing and future subordinated indebtedness. However, NHP LLC’s senior notes are effectively subordinated to NHP LLC’s secured indebtedness, if any, to the extent of the value of the assets securing that indebtedness. NHP LLC’s senior notes are also structurally subordinated to the preferred equity and indebtedness, whether secured or unsecured, of its subsidiaries.
Ventas Realty, Ventas Canada Finance Limited and NHP LLC may redeem each series of their respective senior notes (other than NHP LLC’s 6.90% senior notes due 2037 and 6.59% senior notes due 2038), in whole at any time or in part from time to time, prior to maturity at the redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture (which include, in many instances, a make-whole premium), plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date.
NHP LLC’s 6.90% senior notes due 2037 are subject to repurchase at the option of the holders, at par, on October 1 in each of 2017 and 2027, and its 6.59% senior notes due 2038 are subject to repurchase at the option of the holders, at par, on July 7 in each of 2018, 2023 and 2028.
Mortgages
At December 31, 2015, we had 133 mortgage loans outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $2.0 billion and secured by 157 of our properties. Of these loans, 116 loans in the aggregate principal amount of $1.6 billion bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 3.6% to 8.6% per annum, and 17 loans in the aggregate principal amount of $433.3 million bear interest at variable rates ranging from 0.9% to 3.2% per annum as of December 31, 2015. At December 31, 2015, the weighted average annual rate on our fixed rate mortgage loans was 5.7%, and the weighted average annual rate on our variable rate mortgage loans was 2.0%. Our mortgage loans had a weighted average maturity of 5.5 years as of December 31, 2015.

111

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


During 2015, we repaid in full mortgage loans in the aggregate principal amount of $461.9 million and a weighted average maturity of 2.1 years and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $9.9 million in connection with these repayments.
During 2014, we assumed or incurred mortgage debt of $246.8 million and repaid in full mortgage loans outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $398.0 million, and recognized a net loss on extinguishment of debt of $2.3 million in connection with these repayments.
During 2013, we assumed or incurred mortgage debt of $178.8 million and repaid in full mortgage loans outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $493.7 million, and recognized a net gain on extinguishment of debt of $0.5 million in connection with these repayments.
Scheduled Maturities of Borrowing Arrangements and Other Provisions
As of December 31, 2015, our indebtedness had the following maturities:
 
Principal Amount
Due at Maturity
 
Unsecured Revolving
Credit
Facility(1)
 
Scheduled Periodic
Amortization
 
Total Maturities
 
(In thousands)
2016 (2)
$
602,661

 
$

 
$
31,124

 
$
633,785

2017 (2)
746,458

 

 
28,500

 
774,958

2018
1,101,879

 
180,683

 
23,486

 
1,306,048

2019
1,900,986

 

 
15,929

 
1,916,915

2020
1,416,913

 

 
11,122

 
1,428,035

Thereafter (3)
5,085,663

 

 
125,616

 
5,211,279

Total maturities
$
10,854,560

 
$
180,683

 
$
235,777

 
$
11,271,020

    
(1)
At December 31, 2015, we had $53.0 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, for $127.7 million of net borrowings outstanding under our unsecured revolving credit facility.
(2)
Excludes $22.9 million of mortgage debt related to real estate assets classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2015 that is scheduled to mature in 2016 and 2017.
(3)
Includes $52.4 million aggregate principal amount of 6.90% senior notes due 2037 that is subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, on October 1 in each of 2017 and 2027, and $23.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.59% senior notes due 2038 that is subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, on July 7 in each of 2018, 2023 and 2028.
The instruments governing our outstanding indebtedness contain covenants that limit our ability and the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to, among other things: (i) incur debt; (ii) make certain dividends, distributions and investments; (iii) enter into certain transactions; and/or (iv) merge, consolidate or sell certain assets. Ventas Realty’s and Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s senior notes also require us and our subsidiaries to maintain total unencumbered assets of at least 150% of our unsecured debt. Our unsecured credit facility also requires us to maintain certain financial covenants pertaining to, among other things, our consolidated total leverage, secured debt, unsecured debt, fixed charge coverage and net worth.
As of December 31, 2015, we were in compliance with all of these covenants.
Derivatives and Hedging
In the normal course of our business, interest rate fluctuations affect future cash flows under our variable rate debt obligations, loans receivable and marketable debt securities and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations affect our operating results. We follow established risk management policies and procedures, including the use of derivative instruments, to mitigate the impact of these risks.
For interest rate exposures, we use derivatives primarily to fix the rate on our variable rate debt and to manage our borrowing costs. We do not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes, and we have a policy of entering into contracts only with major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors. When considered together with the underlying exposure that the derivative is designed to hedge, we do not expect that the use of derivatives in this manner would have any material adverse effect on our future financial condition or results of operations.

112

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


As of December 31, 2015, our variable rate debt obligations of $2.2 billion reflect, in part, the effect of $150.5 million notional amount of interest rate swaps with a maturity of March 21, 2018 that effectively convert fixed rate debt to variable rate debt. As of December 31, 2015, our fixed rate debt obligations of $9.1 billion reflect, in part, the effect of $48.1 million notional amount of interest rate swaps with maturities ranging from October 1, 2016 to April 1, 2019, in each case that effectively convert variable rate debt to fixed rate debt.
In February 2016, we entered into a $200 million notional amount interest rate swap with a maturity of August 3, 2020 that effectively converts LIBOR-based floating rate debt to fixed rate debt, setting LIBOR at 1.132% through the maturity date of the swap. The maturity date of the Ardent Term Loan is also August 3, 2020.
Unamortized Fair Value Adjustment
As of December 31, 2015, the unamortized fair value adjustment related to the long-term debt we assumed in connection with various acquisitions was $33.6 million and will be recognized as effective yield adjustments over the remaining terms of the instruments. The estimated aggregate amortization of the fair value adjustment related to long-term debt (which is reflected as a reduction of interest expense) was $16.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 and for each of the next five years will be as follows: 2016$11.2 million; 2017$6.6 million; 2018$2.7 million; 2019$2.0 million; and 2020$1.5 million.
Note 11—Fair Values of Financial Instruments
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the carrying amounts and fair values of our financial instruments were as follows:
 
2015
 
2014
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
(In thousands)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
53,023

 
$
53,023

 
$
55,348

 
$
55,348

Secured loans receivable, net
793,433

 
816,849

 
739,766

 
748,842

Non-mortgage loans receivable, net
37,926

 
38,806

 
17,620

 
19,058

Government-sponsored pooled loan investments
63,679

 
63,679

 
63,115

 
63,115

Marketable securities

 

 
76,046

 
76,046

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior notes payable and other debt, gross
11,271,020

 
11,384,880

 
10,888,295

 
11,197,131

Derivative instruments and other liabilities
2,696

 
2,696

 
2,743

 
2,743

Redeemable OP unitholder interests
188,546

 
188,546

 
159,134

 
159,134

Fair value estimates are subjective in nature and based upon several important assumptions, including estimates of future cash flows, risks, discount rates and relevant comparable market information associated with each financial instrument. The use of different market assumptions and estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the reported estimated fair value amounts. Accordingly, the estimates presented above are not necessarily indicative of the amounts we would realize in a current market exchange.
Note 12—Stock-Based Compensation
Compensation Plans
We currently have: five plans under which outstanding options to purchase common stock, shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units have been, or may in the future be, granted to our officers, employees and non-employee directors (the 2000 Incentive Compensation Plan (Employee Plan), the 2004 Stock Plan for Directors, the 2006 Incentive Plan, the 2006 Stock Plan for Directors, and the 2012 Incentive Plan); one plan under which executive officers may receive common stock in lieu of compensation (the Executive Deferred Stock Compensation Plan); and one plan under which certain non-employee directors have received or may receive common stock in lieu of director fees (the Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan). These plans are referred to collectively as the “Plans.”
During the year ended December 31, 2015, we were permitted to issue shares and grant options, restricted stock and restricted stock units only under the Executive Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, the Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock

113

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Compensation Plan and the 2012 Incentive Plan. The 2006 Incentive Plan and the 2006 Stock Plan for Directors (collectively, the “2006 Plans”) expired on December 31, 2012, and no additional grants were permitted under those Plans after that date.
The number of shares initially reserved for issuance and the number of shares available for future grants or issuance under these Plans as of December 31, 2015 were as follows:
Executive Deferred Stock Compensation Plan—594,070 shares were reserved initially for issuance to our executive officers in lieu of the payment of all or a portion of their salary, at their option, and 594,070 shares were available for future issuance as of December 31, 2015.
Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan—594,070 shares were reserved initially for issuance to nonemployee directors in lieu of the payment of all or a portion of their retainer and meeting fees, at their option, and 478,048 shares were available for future issuance as of December 31, 2015.
2012 Incentive Plan—10,499,135 shares (plus the number of shares or options outstanding under the 2006 Plans as of December 31, 2012 that were or are subsequently forfeited or expire unexercised) were reserved initially for grants or issuance to employees and non-employee directors, and 7,876,301 shares (plus the number of shares or options outstanding under the 2006 Plans as of December 31, 2015 that were or are subsequently forfeited or expire unexercised) were available for future issuance as of December 31, 2015.
Outstanding options issued under the Plans are exercisable at the market price on the date of grant, expire ten years from the date of grant, and vest or have vested over periods of two or three years. If provided in the applicable Plan or award agreement, the vesting of stock options may accelerate upon a change of control (as defined in the applicable Plan) of Ventas, Inc. and other specified events.
In connection with the NHP acquisition, we assumed certain outstanding options, shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units previously issued to NHP employees pursuant to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. 2005 Performance Incentive Plan, as amended (the “NHP Plan”). Any remaining outstanding awards continue to be subject to the terms and conditions of the NHP Plan and the applicable award agreements.
Conversion of Equity Awards at the CCP Spin-Off Date
The Plans were established with anti-dilution provisions, such that in the event of an equity restructuring of Ventas (including spin-off transactions), equity awards would preserve their value post-transaction. In order to achieve an equitable modification of the existing awards following the CCP Spin-Off, we applied the concentration method of converting pre-spin awards to their post-spin value, meaning that Ventas employees remaining at Ventas following the CCP Spin-Off would receive equitably adjusted awards denominated solely in Ventas common stock. The modification assumed a conversion ratio on all awards calculated as the final pre-spin closing price of Ventas common stock divided by the 10-trading day average post-spin closing price of Ventas common stock (the “10 Day Average Price”).  The conversion impacted 120 participants, resulted in additional awards being granted (as summarized in the tables below) and an incremental fair value of both vested awards ($3.5 million) and unvested awards ($1.6 million) due to the difference between the 10 Day Average Price and the closing price on the CCP Spin-Off date.  The vesting periods were unchanged for unvested grants at the CCP Spin-Off date. The incremental fair value of vested awards were recognized immediately and are considered separation costs that are reported in discontinued operations in our Consolidated Statements of Income. The incremental fair value of unvested awards, which are also considered separation costs, will be recognized over the remaining requisite service periods. The number of shares reserved for each of the Plans, as well as the ESPP Plan, were adjusted using the same conversion methodology applied to the outstanding awards.
Stock Options
In determining the estimated fair value of our stock options as of the date of grant, we used the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
Risk-free interest rate
1.02 - 1.38%

 
1.3 - 1.4%

 
0.59 - 0.63%

Dividend yield
5.00
%
 
5.00
%
 
5.00
%
Volatility factors of the expected market price for our common stock
19.0 - 20.0%

 
17.8 - 18.0%

 
24.2 - 31.7%

Weighted average expected life of options
4.0 years

 
4.17 years

 
4.25 - 7.0 years


114

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The following is a summary of stock option activity in 2015:
 
Shares
 
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years)
 
Intrinsic
Value
($000’s)
Outstanding as of December 31, 2014
2,460,628

 
$
57.45

 
 
 
 

Options granted in 2015 pre-spin
792,434

 
76.62

 
 
 
 

Options exercised in 2015 pre-spin
130,273

 
43.30

 
 
 
 

Options forfeited in 2015 pre-spin
12,058

 
62.47

 
 
 
 
Options expired in 2015 pre-spin
2,802

 
66.43

 
 
 
 
Options outstanding pre-spin
3,107,929

 
62.90

 
 
 
 
Options forfeited/expired at spin
511,832

 
65.51

 
 
 
 
Options issued at spin
488,360

 
52.51

 
 
 
 
Options outstanding post-spin
3,084,457

 
52.51

 
 
 
 
Options granted in 2015 post-spin

 
0.00

 
 
 
 
Options exercised in 2015 post-spin
20,814

 
35.13

 
 
 
 
Options forfeited in 2015 post-spin
11,914

 
55.67

 
 
 
 
Options expired in 2015 post-spin

 
0.00

 
 
 
 
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015
3,051,729

 
52.62

 
7.03
 
$
18,216

Exercisable as of December 31, 2015
2,183,113

 
$
49.73

 
6.36
 
$
16,815

Compensation costs for all share-based awards are based on the grant date fair value and are recognized on a straight-line basis during the requisite service periods. Compensation costs related to stock options for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 were $4.2 million, $4.7 million and $4.5 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2015, we had $1.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options granted under the Plans. We expect to recognize that cost over a weighted average period of 1.22 years.
The weighted average grant date fair value of options issued during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $5.89, $4.37 and $9.25, respectively.
Aggregate proceeds received from options exercised under the Plans or the NHP Plan for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 were $6.4 million, $26.2 million and $7.2 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value at exercise of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $4.7 million, $19.3 million and $4.0 million, respectively.
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
We recognize the fair value of shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units on the grant date of the award as stock-based compensation expense over the requisite service period, with charges to general and administrative expenses of approximately $15.2 million in 2015, $16.2 million in 2014 and $16.1 million in 2013. Restricted stock and restricted stock units generally vest over periods ranging from two to five years. If provided in the applicable Plan or award agreement, the vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units may accelerate upon a change of control (as defined in the applicable Plan) of Ventas and other specified events.

115

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


A summary of the status of our non-vested restricted stock and restricted stock units as of December 31, 2015, and changes during the year ended December 31, 2015 follows:
 
Restricted
Stock
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
Restricted
Stock Units
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Nonvested at December 31, 2014
402,741

 
$
58.51

 
11,392

 
$
58.79

Granted in 2015 pre-spin
190,429

 
75.46

 
7,252

 
71.70

Vested in 2015 pre-spin
237,461

 
61.69

 
6,856

 
59.79

Forfeited in 2015 pre-spin
5,602

 
61.12

 
0

 
0.00

Non-vested post-spin
350,107

 
65.53

 
11,788

 
66.15

Forfeited at spin
61,166

 
64.94

 
0

 
0.00

Granted at spin
54,364

 
2.34

 
2,216

 
2.34

Non-vested post-spin
343,305

 
57.60

 
14,004

 
58.02

Granted in 2015 post-spin
31,176

 
56.12

 
0

 
0.00

Vested in 2015 post-spin
3,323

 
50.49

 
0

 
0.00

Forfeited in 2015 post-spin
8,065

 
52.57

 
0

 
0.00

Nonvested at December 31, 2015
363,093

 
$
57.65

 
25,500

 
$
58.02

As of December 31, 2015, we had $9.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock and restricted stock units under the Plans. We expect to recognize that cost over a weighted average period of 1.51 years. The total fair value at the vesting date for restricted stock and restricted stock units that vested during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $18.3 million, $17.7 million and $16.9 million, respectively.
Employee and Director Stock Purchase Plan
We have in effect an Employee and Director Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) under which our employees and directors may purchase shares of our common stock at a discount. Pursuant to the terms of the ESPP, on each purchase date, participants may purchase shares of common stock at a price not less than 90% of the market price on that date (with respect to the employee tax-favored portion of the plan) and not less than 95% of the market price on that date (with respect to the additional employee and director portion of the plan). We initially reserved 2,970,350 shares for issuance under the ESPP. As of December 31, 2015, 79,893 shares had been purchased under the ESPP and 2,890,457 shares were available for future issuance.
Employee Benefit Plan
We maintain a 401(k) plan that allows eligible employees to defer compensation subject to certain limitations imposed by the Code. In 2015, we made contributions for each qualifying employee of up to 3.5% of his or her salary, subject to certain limitations. During 2015, 2014 and 2013, our aggregate contributions were approximately $1,227,000, $1,136,000 and $1,036,000, respectively.
Note 13—Income Taxes
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the applicable provisions of the Code for every year beginning with the year ended December 31, 1999. We have also elected for certain of our subsidiaries to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS” or “TRS entities”), which are subject to federal, state and foreign income taxes. All entities other than the TRS entities are collectively referred to as the “REIT” within this Note 13. Certain REIT entities are subject to foreign income tax.

116

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Although we intend to continue to operate in a manner that will enable us to qualify as a REIT, such qualification depends upon our ability to meet, on a continuing basis, various distribution, stock ownership and other tests. During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, our tax treatment of distributions per common share was as follows:
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
Tax treatment of distributions:
 
 
 
 
 
Ordinary income
$
3.02368

 
$
2.61271

 
$
2.65787

Qualified ordinary income
0.01632

 
0.10474

 
0.03718

Long-term capital gain

 
0.16224

 
0.03995

Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain

 
0.08531

 

Distribution reported for 1099-DIV purposes
$
3.04000

 
$
2.96500

 
$
2.73500

We believe we have met the annual REIT distribution requirement by payment of at least 90% of our estimated taxable income for 2015, 2014 and 2013. Our consolidated benefit for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was as follows:
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Current - Federal
$
138

 
$
878

 
$
3,145

Current - State
1,453

 

 
(461
)
Deferred - Federal
(25,962
)
 
(3,338
)
 
(11,860
)
Deferred - State
(3,054
)
 
(1,772
)
 
(2,396
)
Current - Foreign
953

 
327

 

Deferred - Foreign
(12,812
)
 
(4,827
)
 
(256
)
Total
$
(39,284
)
 
$
(8,732
)
 
$
(11,828
)
The income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2015 is due primarily to the income tax benefit of ordinary losses related to certain TRS entities. The income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily relates to the income tax benefit of ordinary losses and restructuring related to certain TRS entities.
Although the TRS entities have paid minimal cash federal income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2015, their federal income tax liabilities may increase in future years as we exhaust net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards and as our senior living operations reportable business segment grows. Such increases could be significant.
A reconciliation of income tax expense and benefit, which is computed by applying the federal corporate tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, to the income tax benefit is as follows:
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Tax at statutory rate on earnings from continuing operations before unconsolidated entities, noncontrolling interest and income taxes
$
123,086

 
$
122,746

 
$
127,463

State income taxes, net of federal benefit
(657
)
 
(1,152
)
 
(1,857
)
Increase in valuation allowance
20,978

 
23,122

 
7,145

Increase (decrease) in ASC 740 income tax liability
(462
)
 
878

 
2,805

Tax at statutory rate on earnings not subject to federal income taxes
(185,648
)
 
(151,055
)
 
(146,932
)
Foreign rate differential and foreign taxes
3,095

 
3,230

 

Change in tax status of TRS

 
(7,380
)
 

Other differences
324

 
879

 
(452
)
Income tax expense (benefit)
$
(39,284
)
 
$
(8,732
)
 
$
(11,828
)
In connection with our acquisitions of Sunrise Senior Living Real Estate Investment Trust (“Sunrise REIT”) in 2007, and ASLG in 2011, and the Holiday Canada Acquisition in 2014, we established a beginning net deferred tax liability of $306.3 million, $44.6 million and $107.7 million, respectively, related to temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets acquired and liabilities assumed (primarily property, intangible and related assets, net of NOL carryforwards).

117

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


No net deferred tax asset or liability was recorded for the Lillibridge acquisition in 2010 or the acquisition of three triple-net leased private hospitals (located in the United Kingdom) in 2014.
In connection with our acquisitions of HCT and Crimson in 2015, we established a beginning net deferred tax liability of $32.3 million and $18.5 million, respectively, related to temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets acquired and liabilities assumed (primarily property, intangible and related assets, net of NOL carryforwards).
Each TRS is a tax paying component for purposes of classifying deferred tax assets and liabilities. The tax effects of temporary differences and carryforwards (in addition to the REIT carryforwards) included in the net deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 are summarized as follows:
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Property, primarily differences in depreciation and amortization, the tax basis of land assets and the treatment of interests and certain costs
$
(413,566
)
 
$
(406,023
)
 
$
(309,775
)
Operating loss and interest deduction carryforwards
564,091

 
398,859

 
377,645

Expense accruals and other
14,624

 
15,355

 
13,421

Valuation allowance
(503,531
)
 
(352,528
)
 
(331,458
)
Net deferred tax liabilities
$
(338,382
)
 
$
(344,337
)
 
$
(250,167
)
Our net deferred tax liability decreased $6.0 million during 2015 primarily due to $51.8 million of recorded deferred tax liability as a result of the HCT, Canford, Eglise and Ardent acquisitions, offset by the impact of TRS operating losses and currency translation adjustments. Our net deferred tax liability increased $94.2 million during 2014 primarily due to $107.7 million of recorded deferred tax liability as a result of the Holiday Canada acquisition.
Due to uncertainty regarding the realization of certain deferred tax assets, we have established valuation allowances, primarily in connection with the NOL carryforwards related to the REIT and certain TRSs.  The amounts related to NOLs at the REIT and TRS entities for 2015, 2014, and 2013 are $369.4 million and $85.5 million, $251.1 million and $66.1 million, and $250.0 million and $47.0 million, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the net difference between tax bases and the reported amount of REIT assets and liabilities for federal income tax purposes was approximately $4.7 billion and $4.1 billion, respectively, less than the book bases of those assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes.
A rollforward of valuation allowances, for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, is as follows:
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Beginning Balance
$
352,528

 
$
331,458

 
$
326,837

Additions:
 
 
 
 
 
Purchase accounting
172,932

 

 
613

Expenses
24,332

 
28,364

 
31,540

Subtractions:
 
 
 
 
 
Deductions
(42,437
)
 
(2,344
)
 
(23,622
)
Other activity (not resulting in expense or deduction)
(3,824
)
 
(4,950
)
 
(3,910
)
Ending balance
$
503,531

 
$
352,528

 
$
331,458

We are subject to corporate level taxes for any asset dispositions during the five-year period immediately after the assets were owned by a C corporation (either prior to our REIT election, through stock acquisition or merger) (“built-in gains tax”). The amount of income potentially subject to built-in gains tax is generally equal to the lesser of the excess of the fair value of the asset over its adjusted tax basis as of the date it became a REIT asset or the actual amount of gain. Some, but not all, future gains could be offset by available NOL carryforwards.
Generally, we are subject to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for the year ended December 31, 2012 and subsequent years and are subject to audit by state taxing authorities for the year ended December 31, 2011 and subsequent years. We are subject to audit by the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) and provincial authorities with respect to entities acquired or formed in connection with our 2007 acquisition of Sunrise Senior Living Real

118

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Estate Investment Trust generally for periods subsequent to the acquisition. We are also subject to audit in Canada for periods subsequent to the acquisition, and certain prior periods, with respect to the entities acquired in connection with the Holiday Canada Acquisition.
At December 31, 2015, we had a combined NOL carryforward of $460.2 million related to the TRS entities and an NOL carryforward of $1.1 billion related to the REIT, including $18.6 million and $442.6 million of the REIT NOL carried over from the HCT and Ardent acquisitions, respectively. Additionally, $10.5 million of Federal income tax credits were carried over from the Ardent entities. These amounts can be used to offset future taxable income (and/or taxable income for prior years if an audit determines that tax is owed), if any. The REIT will be entitled to utilize NOLs and tax credit carryforwards only to the extent that REIT taxable income exceeds our deduction for dividends paid. Lillibridge, ASLG and Ardent NOL and credit carryforwards are limited as to their utilization by Section 382 of the Code. The NOL carryforwards begin to expire in 2024 with respect to the TRS entities and in 2019 for the REIT.
As a result of our uncertainty regarding the use of existing REIT NOLs, we have not ascribed any net deferred tax benefit to REIT NOL carryforwards as of December 31, 2015 and 2014. The IRS may challenge our entitlement to these tax attributes during its review of the tax returns for the previous tax years. We believe we are entitled to these tax attributes but cannot assure you as to the outcome of these matters.
The following table summarizes the activity related to our unrecognized tax benefits:
 
2015
 
2014
 
(In thousands)
Balance as of January 1
$
25,446

 
$
21,906

Additions to tax positions related to the current year

 
4,507

Additions to tax positions related to prior years
248

 
126

Subtractions to tax positions related to prior years
(677
)
 
(129
)
Subtractions to tax positions related to settlements

 

Subtractions to tax positions as a result of the lapse of the statute of limitations
(882
)
 
(964
)
Balance as of December 31
$
24,135

 
$
25,446

Included in these unrecognized tax benefits of $24.1 million and $25.4 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, were $22.5 million and $23.9 million of tax benefits at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, that, if recognized, would reduce our annual effective tax rate. We accrued interest of $0.4 million related to the unrecognized tax benefits during 2015, but no penalties. We expect our unrecognized tax benefits to decrease by $3.4 million during 2016.
As a part of the transfer pricing structure in the normal course of business, the REIT enters into transactions with certain TRSs, such as leasing transactions, other capital financing and allocation of general and administrative costs, which transactions are intended to comply with Internal Revenue Service and foreign tax authority transfer pricing rules.
Note 14—Commitments and Contingencies
Certain Obligations, Liabilities and Litigation
We may be subject to various obligations, liabilities and litigation assumed in connection with or arising out of our acquisitions or otherwise arising in connection with our business, some of which may be indemnifiable by third parties. If these liabilities are greater than expected or were not known to us at the time of acquisition, if we are not entitled to indemnification, or if the responsible third party fails to indemnify us, such obligations, liabilities and litigation could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. In addition, in connection with the sale or leasing of our properties, we may incur various obligations and liabilities, including indemnification obligations to the buyer or tenant, relating to the operations of those properties, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Other
With respect to certain of our properties, we are subject to operating and ground lease obligations that generally require fixed monthly or annual rent payments and may include escalation clauses and renewal options. These leases have terms that expire during the next 86 years, excluding extension options. Our future minimum lease obligations under non-cancelable operating and ground leases as of December 31, 2015 were $31.3 million in 2016, $24.6 million in 2017, $20.3 million in 2018, $17.0 million in 2019, $16.4 million in 2020, and $520.0 million thereafter.

119

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Note 15—Earnings Per Share
The following table shows the amounts used in computing our basic and diluted earnings per common share:
 
For the Year Ended December 31,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders
$
406,740

 
$
376,032

 
$
374,338

Discontinued operations
11,103

 
99,735

 
79,171

Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
417,843

 
$
475,767

 
$
453,509

Denominator:
 
 
 
 
 
Denominator for basic earnings per share—weighted average shares
330,311

 
294,175

 
292,654

Effect of dilutive securities:
 
 
 
 
 
Stock options
360

 
495

 
534

Restricted stock awards
41

 
55

 
99

OP units
3,295

 
1,952

 
1,823

Denominator for diluted earnings per share—adjusted weighted average shares
334,007

 
296,677

 
295,110

Basic earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders
$
1.23

 
$
1.28

 
$
1.28

Discontinued operations
0.03

 
0.34

 
0.27

Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
1.26

 
$
1.62

 
$
1.55

Diluted earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders
$
1.22

 
$
1.26

 
$
1.27

Discontinued operations
0.03

 
0.34

 
0.27

Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
1.25

 
$
1.60

 
$
1.54

There were 852,805, 479,291 and 504,815 anti-dilutive options outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Note 16—Litigation
Litigation Relating to the HCT Acquisition
In the weeks following the announcement on June 2, 2014 of our agreement to acquire HCT, a total of 13 putative class actions were filed by purported HCT stockholders challenging the transaction. Certain of the actions also purport to bring derivative claims on behalf of HCT. Among other things, the lawsuits allege that the directors of HCT breached their fiduciary duties by approving the transaction and that we and our subsidiaries, Stripe Sub, LLC and Stripe OP, LP, aided and abetted this purported breach of fiduciary duty. The complaints seek injunctive relief and damages.
Ten of these actions were filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland and consolidated under the caption In re: American Realty Capital, Healthcare Trust, Inc. Shareholder & Derivative Litigation, Case No. 24-C-14-003534, two actions were filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, and one action was filed in the United States District Court of Maryland.
On January 2, 2015, the parties to the consolidated Maryland state court action entered into a memorandum of understanding that contemplated the settlement of the Maryland action and the release of all claims that could be brought by or on behalf of any HCT stockholder related to the HCT acquisition, including all claims asserted on behalf of each alleged class of HCT stockholders. The proposed settlement terms require HCT to make certain additional disclosures related to the merger, which were set forth in HCT's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 2, 2015.
On January 5, 2015, the parties to the federal action also entered into a memorandum of understanding that contemplated the settlement of the federal action and the release of all claims that could be brought by or on behalf of any HCT stockholder related to the HCT acquisition, including all claims asserted on behalf of each alleged class of HCT stockholders. The proposed

120

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


settlement terms required HCT to make certain additional disclosures related to the merger, which were set forth in HCT's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 5, 2015.
On August 24, 2015, the plaintiffs in the Maryland state court action submitted a stipulation of settlement to the court executed by the parties and moved for preliminary approval of the settlement. The plaintiffs in the Maryland federal action have agreed to allow the settlement to proceed through the state court and do not currently plan to submit an additional stipulation to the federal court. On December 10, 2015, the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland entered a preliminary approval order that, among other things, directed notice be sent to members of the class of HCT stockholders and scheduled a settlement hearing to be held on March 15, 2016, at which time the court will review any objections lodged by class members and consider the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of the settlement. The settlement is contingent on final court approval after the settlement hearing. There can be no assurance that the court will approve the proposed settlement.
We believe that each of these actions is without merit.
Proceedings against Tenants, Operators and Managers
From time to time, Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred, Atria, Sunrise and our other tenants, operators and managers are parties to certain legal actions, regulatory investigations and claims arising in the conduct of their business and operations. Even though we generally are not party to these proceedings, the unfavorable resolution of any such actions, investigations or claims could, individually or in the aggregate, materially adversely affect such tenants’, operators’ or managers’ liquidity, financial condition or results of operations and their ability to satisfy their respective obligations to us, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Proceedings Indemnified and Defended by Third Parties
From time to time, we are party to certain legal actions, regulatory investigations and claims for which third parties are contractually obligated to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless. The tenants of our triple-net leased properties and, in some cases, their affiliates are required by the terms of their leases and other agreements with us to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless against certain actions, investigations and claims arising in the course of their business and related to the operations of our triple-net leased properties. In addition, third parties from whom we acquired certain of our assets and, in some cases, their affiliates are required by the terms of the related conveyance documents to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless against certain actions, investigations and claims related to the acquired assets and arising prior to our ownership or related to excluded assets and liabilities. In some cases, a portion of the purchase price consideration is held in escrow for a specified period of time as collateral for these indemnification obligations. We are presently being defended by certain tenants and other obligated third parties in these types of matters. We cannot assure you that our tenants, their affiliates or other obligated third parties will continue to defend us in these matters, that our tenants, their affiliates or other obligated third parties will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable them to satisfy their defense and indemnification obligations to us or that any purchase price consideration held in escrow will be sufficient to satisfy claims for which we are entitled to indemnification. The unfavorable resolution of any such actions, investigations or claims could, individually or in the aggregate, materially adversely affect our tenants’ or other obligated third parties’ liquidity, financial condition or results of operations and their ability to satisfy their respective obligations to us, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Proceedings Arising in Connection with Senior Living and MOB Operations; Other Litigation
From time to time, we are party to various legal actions, regulatory investigations and claims (some of which may not be insured and some of which may allege large damage amounts) arising in connection with our senior living and MOB operations or otherwise in the course of our business. In limited circumstances, the manager of the applicable seniors housing community or MOB may be contractually obligated to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless against such actions, investigations and claims. It is the opinion of management that, except as otherwise set forth in this Note 16, the disposition of any such actions, investigations and claims that are currently pending will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on us. However, regardless of their merits, we may be forced to expend significant financial resources to defend and resolve these matters. We are unable to predict the ultimate outcome of these actions, investigations and claims, and if management’s assessment of our liability with respect thereto is incorrect, such actions, investigations and claims could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

121

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Note 17—Permanent and Temporary Equity
Capital Stock
In January 2015, in connection with the HCT acquisition, we issued approximately 28.4 million shares of our common stock and 1.1 million Class C Units that are redeemable for our common stock. In April 2015, third party investors redeemed 445,541 Class C Units for approximately $32.6 million. Beginning on January 16, 2016 and as of February 10, 2016, third party investors executed redemption right exercise notices for Ventas Realty Capital Healthcare Trust Operating Partnership, L.P. to redeem 303,136 Class C Units. We expect that the Class C Units will be redeemed through the issuance of 303,136 shares of Ventas common stock on or before April 1, 2016, but we have the right to redeem the Class Units for a cash amount.
In March 2013, we established an “at-the-market” (“ATM”) equity offering program through which we could sell from time to time up to an aggregate of $750 million of our common stock. In January 2015, we issued and sold 3,750,202 shares of common stock under our previous ATM equity offering program for aggregate net proceeds of $285.4 million, after sales agent commissions of $4.4 million. In March 2015, we replaced our previous shelf registration statement that was scheduled to expire in accordance with the SEC’s rules with a new universal shelf registration statement, rendering our previous ATM program inaccessible. In connection with our new universal shelf registration statement, we established a new ATM program pursuant to which we may sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate of $1.0 billion of our common stock. Through December 31, 2015, we have issued and sold a total of 3,434,839 shares of our common stock under our ATM equity offering program for aggregate net proceeds of $206.2 million, after sales agent commissions of $3.1 million. As of December 31, 2015, approximately $790.7 million of our common stock remained available for sale under our ATM equity offering program. Subsequent to December 31, 2015, we have issued and sold a total of 1,649,463 shares of our common stock under our ATM equity offering program for aggregate net proceeds of $90.8 million, after sales agent commissions of $1.4 million.
For the year ended December 31, 2014, we issued and sold a total of 3,381,678 shares of common stock under the ATM program for aggregate net proceeds of $242.3 million, after sales agent commissions of $3.7 million.
For the year ended December 31, 2013, we issued and sold a total of 2,069,200 shares of common stock under the ATM program for aggregate net proceeds of $141.5 million, after sales agent commissions of $2.1 million.
Excess Share Provision
In order to preserve our ability to maintain REIT status, our Charter provides that if a person acquires beneficial ownership of more than 9% of our outstanding common stock or 9.9% of our outstanding preferred stock, the shares that are beneficially owned in excess of such limit are deemed to be excess shares. These shares are automatically deemed transferred to a trust for the benefit of a charitable institution or other qualifying organization selected by our Board of Directors. The trust is entitled to all dividends with respect to the shares and the trustee may exercise all voting power over the shares.
We have the right to buy the excess shares for a purchase price equal to the lesser of the price per share in the transaction that created the excess shares or the market price on the date we buy the shares, and we may defer payment of the purchase price for the excess shares for up to five years. If we do not purchase the excess shares, the trustee of the trust is required to transfer the excess shares at the direction of the Board of Directors. The owner of the excess shares is entitled to receive the lesser of the proceeds from the sale or the original purchase price for such excess shares, and any additional amounts are payable to the beneficiary of the trust.
Our Board of Directors is empowered to grant waivers from the excess share provisions of our Charter.
Distribution Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan
Prior to its suspension in July 2014, our Distribution Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (“DRIP”) enabled existing stockholders to purchase shares of common stock by reinvesting all or a portion of the cash distribution on their shares of our common stock, subject to certain limits. Existing stockholders and new investors also could purchase shares of our common stock under the DRIP by making optional cash payments, subject to certain limits. In 2014, we offered a 1% discount on the purchase price of our common stock to shareholders who reinvested their dividends or made optional cash purchases through the DRIP. We may determine whether or not to reinstate the DRIP at any time at our sole discretion, and if so, the amount and availability of this discount will be at our discretion. The granting of a discount for one month or quarter, as applicable, will not insure the availability or amount of a discount in future periods, and each month or quarter, as applicable, we may lower or eliminate the discount without prior notice. In addition, we may change our determination as to whether common shares will be purchased by the plan administrator directly from us or in the open market without prior notice to investors.
   

122

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The following is a summary of our accumulated other comprehensive income as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:
 
2015
 
2014
 
(In thousands)
Foreign currency translation
$
(13,926
)
 
$
866

Unrealized gain on marketable securities
1,738

 
6,785

Other
4,623

 
5,470

Total accumulated other comprehensive income
$
(7,565
)
 
$
13,121

Redeemable OP Unitholder and Noncontrolling Interest
The following is a rollforward of our redeemable OP unitholder interests and noncontrolling interests for 2015:
 
 
Redeemable OP Unitholder Interests
 
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
 
Total Redeemable OP Unitholder and Noncontrolling Interests
 
 
(In thousands)
Balance as of December 31, 2014
 
$
159,135

 
$
12,880

 
$
172,015

New issuances
 
87,245

 

 
87,245

Change in valuation
 
(7,832
)
 
(1,082
)
 
(8,914
)
Distributions and other
 
(15,095
)
 
(491
)
 
(15,586
)
Redemptions
 
(34,907
)
 
(3,324
)
 
(38,231
)
Balance as of December 31, 2015
 
$
188,546

 
$
7,983

 
$
196,529


Note 18—Related Party Transactions
As disclosed in “Note 3 - Concentration of Credit Risk”, Atria provides comprehensive property management and accounting services with respect to our seniors housing communities that Atria operates, for which we pay annual management fees pursuant to long-term management agreements.  Most of our management agreements with Atria have initial terms expiring either July 31, 2024, or December 31, 2027, with successive automatic ten-year renewal periods. The management fees payable to Atria under most of the Atria management agreements range from 4.5% to 5% of revenues generated by the applicable properties, and Atria can earn up to an additional 1% of revenues based on the achievement of specified performance targets. Atria also provides certain construction and development management services relating to various development and redevelopment projects within our seniors housing portfolio. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, we incurred fees to Atria of $58 million, $52.7 million and $44.2 million respectively, the majority of which are recorded within property-level operating expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
As disclosed in “Note 4 - Acquisitions of Real Estate Property”, we leased ten hospital campuses to Ardent pursuant to a single, triple-net master lease agreement. Pursuant to our master lease agreement, Ardent is obligated to pay base rent, which escalates annually by the lesser of four times the increase in the consumer price index for the relevant period and 2.5%.  The initial term of the master lease expires on August 31, 2035 and Ardent has one ten-year renewal option. For the period from the closing of the Ardent Transaction through December 31, 2015, we recognized rental income from Ardent of $42.9 million. We also paid certain transaction-related fees to Ardent of $40.0 million, which are recorded within merger-related expenses and deal costs in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
These transactions are considered to be arm’s length in nature.





123

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Note 19—Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
Summarized unaudited consolidated quarterly information for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 is provided below.
 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues (1)
$
805,598

 
$
811,920

 
$
827,606

 
$
841,274

Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders, including real estate dispositions (1)
$
102,868

 
$
131,578

 
$
45,235

 
$
127,059

Discontinued operations (1)
17,574

 
18,243

 
(22,383
)
 
(2,331
)
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
120,442

 
$
149,821

 
$
22,852

 
$
124,728

Earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders, including real estate dispositions
$
0.32

 
$
0.39

 
$
0.14

 
$
0.38

Discontinued operations
0.05

 
0.06

 
(0.07
)
 
(0.01
)
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
0.37

 
$
0.45

 
$
0.07

 
$
0.37

Diluted:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders, including real estate dispositions
$
0.32

 
$
0.40

 
$
0.14

 
$
0.38

Discontinued operations
0.05

 
0.05

 
(0.07
)
 
(0.01
)
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
0.37

 
$
0.45

 
$
0.07

 
$
0.37

Dividends declared per share
$
0.79

 
$
0.79

 
$
0.73

 
$
0.73

________________________
(1)
The amounts presented for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2015 differ from the amounts previously reported in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q as a result of properties not previously included in discontinued operations in the respective reporting periods.
 
For the Three Months Ended
 
March 31,
2015
 
June 30,
2015
 
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues, previously reported in Form 10-Q
$
884,024

 
$
891,322

Revenues, previously reported in continuing operations in Form 10-Q
(78,426
)
 
(79,402
)
Total revenues disclosed in Form 10-K
$
805,598

 
$
811,920

Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders, including real estate dispositions, previously reported in Form 10-Q
$
120,865

 
$
149,754

Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders, including real estate dispositions, previously reported in continuing operations in Form 10-Q
(17,997
)
 
(18,176
)
Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders, including real estate dispositions disclosed in Form 10-K
$
102,868

 
$
131,578

Discontinued operations, previously reported in Form 10-Q
$
(423
)
 
$
67

Operations from properties previously reported in continuing operations in Form 10-Q
17,997

 
18,176

Discontinued operations disclosed in Form 10-K
$
17,574

 
$
18,243




124

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues (1)
$
665,262

 
$
674,529

 
$
704,932

 
$
732,090

Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders, including real estate dispositions (1)
$
90,973

 
$
107,617

 
$
90,961

 
$
86,481

Discontinued operations (1)
30,074

 
30,781

 
18,171

 
20,709

Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
121,047

 
$
138,398

 
$
109,132

 
$
107,190

Earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders, including real estate dispositions
$
0.31

 
$
0.37

 
$
0.28

 
$
0.29

Discontinued operations
0.10

 
0.10

 
0.05

 
0.07

Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
0.41

 
$
0.47

 
$
0.33

 
$
0.36

Diluted:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders, including real estate dispositions
$
0.31

 
$
0.37

 
$
0.27

 
$
0.29

Discontinued operations
0.10

 
0.10

 
0.05

 
0.07

Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
0.41

 
$
0.47

 
$
0.32

 
$
0.36

Dividends declared per share
$
0.725

 
$
0.725

 
$
0.725

 
$
0.79

________________________
(1)
The amounts presented for the three months ended March 31, 2014, June 30, 2014, September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014 differ from the amounts previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 as a result of properties not previously included in discontinued operations as of December 31, 2014.
 
For the Three Months Ended
 
March 31,
2014
 
June 30,
2014
 
September 30,
2014
 
December 31,
2014
 
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues, previously reported in Form 10-K
$
741,470

 
$
751,254

 
$
779,035

 
$
803,987

Revenues, previously reported in continuing operations in Form 10-K
(76,208
)
 
(76,725
)
 
(74,103
)
 
(71,897
)
Total revenues disclosed in Form 10-K
$
665,262

 
$
674,529

 
$
704,932

 
$
732,090

Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders, including real estate dispositions, previously reported in Form 10-K
$
118,016

 
$
138,653

 
$
109,391

 
$
107,601

Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders, including real estate dispositions, previously reported in continuing operations in Form 10-K
(27,043
)
 
(31,036
)
 
(18,430
)
 
(21,120
)
Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders, including real estate dispositions disclosed in Form 10-K
$
90,973

 
$
107,617

 
$
90,961

 
$
86,481

Discontinued operations, previously reported in Form 10-K
$
3,031

 
$
(255
)
 
$
(259
)
 
$
(411
)
Operations from properties previously reported in continuing operations in Form 10-K
27,043

 
31,036

 
18,430

 
21,120

Discontinued operations disclosed in Form 10-K
$
30,074

 
$
30,781

 
$
18,171

 
$
20,709


125

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Note 20—Segment Information
As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 we operated through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and MOB operations. Under our triple-net leased properties segment, we invest in seniors housing and healthcare properties throughout the United States and the United Kingdom and lease those properties to healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses. In our senior living operations segment, we invest in seniors housing communities throughout the United States and Canada and engage independent operators, such as Atria and Sunrise, to manage those communities. In our MOB operations segment, we primarily acquire, own, develop, lease, and manage MOBs throughout the United States. Information provided for “all other” includes income from loans and investments and other miscellaneous income and various corporate-level expenses not directly attributable to our three reportable business segments. Assets included in “all other” consist primarily of corporate assets, including cash, restricted cash, deferred financing costs, loans receivable and investments, and miscellaneous accounts receivable.
We evaluate performance of the combined properties in each reportable business segment based on segment profit, which we define as NOI adjusted for income/loss from unconsolidated entities. We define NOI as total revenues, less interest and other income, property-level operating expenses and medical office building services costs. We consider segment profit useful because it allows investors, analysts and our management to measure unlevered property-level operating results and to compare our operating results to the operating results of other real estate companies and between periods on a consistent basis. In order to facilitate a clear understanding of our historical consolidated historical operating results, segment profit should be examined in conjunction with net income as presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements and other financial data included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Interest expense, depreciation and amortization, general, administrative and professional fees, income tax expense, discontinued operations and other non-property specific revenues and expenses are not allocated to individual reportable business segments for purposes of assessing segment performance. There are no intersegment sales or transfers.

126

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Summary information by reportable business segment is as follows:
For the year ended December 31, 2015:
 
Triple-Net
Leased
Properties
 
Senior
Living
Operations
 
MOB
Operations
 
All
Other
 
Total
 
(In thousands)
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
779,801

 
$

 
$
566,245

 
$

 
$
1,346,046

Resident fees and services

 
1,811,255

 

 

 
1,811,255

Medical office building and other services revenue
4,433

 

 
34,436

 
2,623

 
41,492

Income from loans and investments

 

 

 
86,553

 
86,553

Interest and other income

 

 

 
1,052

 
1,052

Total revenues
$
784,234

 
$
1,811,255

 
$
600,681

 
$
90,228

 
$
3,286,398

Total revenues
$
784,234

 
$
1,811,255

 
$
600,681

 
$
90,228

 
$
3,286,398

Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest and other income

 

 

 
1,052

 
1,052

Property-level operating expenses

 
1,209,415

 
174,225

 

 
1,383,640

Medical office building services costs

 

 
26,565

 

 
26,565

Segment NOI
784,234

 
601,840

 
399,891

 
89,176

 
1,875,141

(Loss) income from unconsolidated entities
(813
)
 
(526
)
 
369

 
(450
)
 
(1,420
)
Segment profit
$
783,421

 
$
601,314

 
$
400,260

 
$
88,726

 
1,873,721

Interest and other income
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
1,052

Interest expense
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(367,114
)
Depreciation and amortization
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(894,057
)
General, administrative and professional fees
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(128,035
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(14,411
)
Merger-related expenses and deal costs
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(102,944
)
Other
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(17,957
)
Income tax benefit
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
39,284

Discontinued operations
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
11,103

Gain on real estate dispositions
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
18,580

Net income
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
$
419,222


127

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


For the year ended December 31, 2014:
 
Triple-Net
Leased
Properties
 
Senior
Living
Operations
 
MOB
Operations
 
All
Other
 
Total
 
(In thousands)
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
674,547

 
$

 
$
463,910

 
$

 
$
1,138,457

Resident fees and services

 
1,552,951

 

 

 
1,552,951

Medical office building and other services revenue
4,565

 

 
22,529

 
2,270

 
29,364

Income from loans and investments

 

 

 
51,778

 
51,778

Interest and other income

 

 

 
4,263

 
4,263

Total revenues
$
679,112

 
$
1,552,951

 
$
486,439

 
$
58,311

 
$
2,776,813

Total revenues
$
679,112

 
$
1,552,951

 
$
486,439

 
$
58,311

 
$
2,776,813

Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest and other income

 

 

 
4,263

 
4,263

Property-level operating expenses

 
1,036,556

 
158,832

 

 
1,195,388

Medical office building services costs

 

 
17,092

 

 
17,092

Segment NOI
679,112

 
516,395

 
310,515

 
54,048

 
1,560,070

Income (loss) from unconsolidated entities
859

 
(658
)
 
398

 
(738
)
 
(139
)
Segment profit
$
679,971

 
$
515,737

 
$
310,913

 
$
53,310

 
1,559,931

Interest and other income
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
4,263

Interest expense
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(292,065
)
Depreciation and amortization
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(725,216
)
General, administrative and professional fees
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(121,738
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(5,564
)
Merger-related expenses and deal costs
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(43,304
)
Other
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(25,743
)
Income tax benefit
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
8,732

Discontinued operations
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
99,735

Gain on real estate dispositions
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
17,970

Net income
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
$
477,001


128

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


For the year ended December 31, 2013:
 
Triple-Net
Leased
Properties
 
Senior
Living
Operations
 
MOB
Operations
 
All
Other
 
Total
 
(In thousands)
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
586,016

 
$

 
$
450,340

 
$

 
$
1,036,356

Resident fees and services

 
1,406,005

 

 

 
1,406,005

Medical office building and other services revenue
4,469

 

 
12,077

 
1,263

 
17,809

Income from loans and investments

 

 

 
54,425

 
54,425

Interest and other income

 

 

 
2,022

 
2,022

Total revenues
$
590,485

 
$
1,406,005

 
$
462,417

 
$
57,710

 
$
2,516,617

Total revenues
$
590,485

 
$
1,406,005

 
$
462,417

 
$
57,710

 
$
2,516,617

Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest and other income

 

 

 
2,022

 
2,022

Property-level operating expenses

 
956,684

 
153,241

 

 
1,109,925

Medical office building services costs

 

 
8,315

 

 
8,315

Segment NOI
590,485

 
449,321

 
300,861

 
55,688

 
1,396,355

Income (loss) from unconsolidated entities
475

 
(1,980
)
 
1,451

 
(454
)
 
(508
)
Segment profit
$
590,960

 
$
447,341

 
$
302,312

 
$
55,234

 
1,395,847

Interest and other income
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
2,022

Interest expense
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(249,009
)
Depreciation and amortization
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(629,908
)
General, administrative and professional fees
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(115,083
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1,201
)
Merger-related expenses and deal costs
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(21,634
)
Other
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(17,364
)
Income tax benefit
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
11,828

Discontinued operations
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
79,171

Net income
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
$
454,669

Assets by reportable business segment are as follows:
 
As of December 31,
 
2015
 
2014
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Triple-net leased properties
$
7,996,645

 
35.9
%
 
$
9,115,901

 
43.1
%
Senior living operations
8,022,206

 
36.0

 
7,421,924

 
35.1

MOB operations
5,209,751

 
23.4

 
3,526,217

 
16.6

All other assets
1,033,316

 
4.7

 
1,101,871

 
5.2

Total assets
$
22,261,918

 
100.0
%
 
$
21,165,913

 
100.0
%

129

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Capital expenditures, including investments in real estate property and development project expenditures, by reportable business segment are as follows:
 
For the Year Ended December 31,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Capital expenditures:
 
 
 
 
 
Triple-net leased properties
$
1,890,245

 
$
647,870

 
$
847,945

Senior living operations
382,877

 
977,997

 
576,459

MOB operations
604,827

 
36,861

 
189,953

Total capital expenditures
$
2,877,949

 
$
1,662,728

 
$
1,614,357

 
 
Our portfolio of properties and mortgage loan and other investments are located in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. Revenues are attributed to an individual country based on the location of each property.
Geographic information regarding our operations is as follows:
 
For the Year Ended December 31,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
United States
$
3,086,449

 
$
2,636,591

 
$
2,423,399

Canada
173,778

 
126,435

 
93,218

United Kingdom
26,171

 
13,787

 

Total revenues
$
3,286,398

 
$
2,776,813

 
$
2,516,617


 
As of December 31,
 
2015
 
2014
 
(In thousands)
Net real estate property:
 
 
 
United States
$
18,271,829

 
$
15,334,686

Canada
1,039,561

 
1,269,710

United Kingdom
313,830

 
168,594

Total net real estate property
$
19,625,220

 
$
16,772,990

Note 21—Condensed Consolidating Information
Ventas, Inc. has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to the outstanding senior notes issued by our 100% owned subsidiary, Ventas Realty, including the senior notes that were jointly issued with Ventas Capital Corporation. Ventas Capital Corporation is a direct 100% owned subsidiary of Ventas Realty that has no assets or operations, but was formed in 2002 solely to facilitate offerings of senior notes by a limited partnership. None of our other subsidiaries (such subsidiaries, excluding Ventas Realty and Ventas Capital Corporation, the “Ventas Subsidiaries”) is obligated with respect to Ventas Realty’s outstanding senior notes.
Ventas, Inc. has also fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to the outstanding senior notes issued by our 100% owned subsidiary, Ventas Canada Finance Limited. None of our other subsidiaries is obligated with respect to Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s outstanding senior notes, all of which were issued on a private placement basis in Canada.
In connection with the NHP acquisition, our 100% owned subsidiary, NHP LLC, as successor to NHP, assumed the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to the outstanding senior notes issued by NHP. Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries (other than NHP LLC) is obligated with respect to any of NHP LLC’s outstanding senior notes.

130

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Under certain circumstances, contractual and legal restrictions, including those contained in the instruments governing our subsidiaries’ outstanding mortgage indebtedness, may restrict our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries for the purpose of meeting our debt service obligations, including our payment guarantees with respect to Ventas Realty’s and Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s senior notes. Certain of our real estate assets are also subject to mortgages.
The following summarizes our condensed consolidating information as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013:
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2015
 
Ventas, Inc.
 
Ventas
Realty (1)
 
Ventas Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated
Elimination
 
Consolidated
 
(In thousands)
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net real estate investments
$
5,798

 
$
195,015

 
$
20,377,226

 
$

 
$
20,578,039

Cash and cash equivalents
11,733

 

 
41,290

 

 
53,023

Escrow deposits and restricted cash
7,154

 
1,644

 
69,098

 

 
77,896

Deferred financing costs, net

 

 

 

 

Investment in and advances to affiliates
12,989,643

 
3,545,183

 

 
(16,534,826
)
 

Goodwill

 

 
1,047,497

 

 
1,047,497

Assets held for sale

 
4,488

 
88,572

 

 
93,060

Other assets
17,869

 
4,182

 
390,352

 

 
412,403

Total assets
$
13,032,197

 
$
3,750,512

 
$
22,014,035

 
$
(16,534,826
)
 
$
22,261,918

Liabilities and equity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior notes payable and other debt
$

 
$
8,370,670

 
$
2,836,326

 
$

 
$
11,206,996

Intercompany loans
7,294,158

 
(6,571,512
)
 
(722,646
)
 

 

Accrued interest

 
64,561

 
16,303

 

 
80,864

Accounts payable and other liabilities
68,604

 
45,226

 
665,550

 

 
779,380

Liabilities held for sale

 
44

 
34,296

 

 
34,340

Deferred income taxes
338,382

 

 

 

 
338,382

Total liabilities
7,701,144

 
1,908,989

 
2,829,829

 

 
12,439,962

Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests

 

 
196,529

 

 
196,529

Total equity
5,331,053

 
1,841,523

 
18,987,677

 
(16,534,826
)
 
9,625,427

Total liabilities and equity
$
13,032,197

 
$
3,750,512

 
$
22,014,035

 
$
(16,534,826
)
 
$
22,261,918

    
(1)
Certain of Ventas Realty’s outstanding senior notes were issued jointly with our 100% owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation, which has no assets or operations.


131

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2014
 
Ventas, Inc.
 
Ventas
Realty (1)
 
Ventas Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated
Elimination
 
Consolidated
 
(In thousands)
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net real estate investments
$
6,404

 
$
216,521

 
$
17,444,818

 
$

 
$
17,667,743

Cash and cash equivalents
24,857

 

 
30,491

 

 
55,348

Escrow deposits and restricted cash
2,102

 
1,424

 
68,245

 

 
71,771

Deferred financing costs, net

 

 

 

 

Investment in and advances to affiliates
10,783,780

 
3,430,055

 

 
(14,213,835
)
 

Goodwill

 

 
363,971

 

 
363,971

Assets held for sale

 
150,405

 
2,404,917

 

 
2,555,322

Other assets
98,605

 
41,821

 
311,332

 

 
451,758

Total assets
$
10,915,748

 
$
3,840,226

 
$
20,623,774

 
$
(14,213,835
)
 
$
21,165,913

Liabilities and equity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior notes payable and other debt
$

 
$
7,371,547

 
$
3,472,804

 
$

 
$
10,844,351

Intercompany loans
5,555,196

 
(5,562,739
)
 
7,543

 

 

Accrued interest

 
43,212

 
18,970

 

 
62,182

Accounts payable and other liabilities
103,469

 
55,909

 
591,279

 

 
750,657

Liabilities held for sale

 
24,398

 
213,575

 

 
237,973

Deferred income taxes
344,337

 

 

 

 
344,337

Total liabilities
6,003,002

 
1,932,327

 
4,304,171

 

 
12,239,500

Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests

 

 
172,016

 

 
172,016

Total equity
4,912,746

 
1,907,899

 
16,147,587

 
(14,213,835
)
 
8,754,397

Total liabilities and equity
$
10,915,748

 
$
3,840,226

 
$
20,623,774

 
$
(14,213,835
)
 
$
21,165,913

    
(1)
Certain of Ventas Realty’s outstanding senior notes were issued jointly with our 100% owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation, which has no assets or operations.










132

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
 
Ventas, Inc.
 
Ventas
Realty (1)
 
Ventas Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated
Elimination
 
Consolidated
 
(In thousands)
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
3,663

 
$
198,017

 
$
1,144,366

 
$

 
$
1,346,046

Resident fees and services

 

 
1,811,255

 

 
1,811,255

Medical office building and other services revenues
895

 

 
40,597

 

 
41,492

Income from loans and investments
8,605

 
534

 
77,414

 

 
86,553

Equity earnings in affiliates
458,213

 

 
1,332

 
(459,545
)
 

Interest and other income
495

 
(6
)
 
563

 

 
1,052

Total revenues
471,871

 
198,545

 
3,075,527

 
(459,545
)
 
3,286,398

Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest
(38,393
)
 
257,503

 
148,004

 

 
367,114

Depreciation and amortization
5,443

 
14,679

 
873,935

 

 
894,057

Property-level operating expenses

 
367

 
1,383,273

 

 
1,383,640

Medical office building services costs

 

 
26,565

 

 
26,565

General, administrative and professional fees
(321
)
 
20,777

 
107,579

 

 
128,035

Loss on extinguishment of debt, net

 
4,523

 
9,888

 

 
14,411

Merger-related expenses and deal costs
98,644

 
75

 
4,225

 

 
102,944

Other
(358
)
 
45

 
18,270

 

 
17,957

Total expenses
65,015

 
297,969

 
2,571,739

 

 
2,934,723

Income (loss) before loss from unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations, real estate dispositions and noncontrolling interest
406,856

 
(99,424
)
 
503,788

 
(459,545
)
 
351,675

Loss from unconsolidated entities

 
(183
)
 
(1,237
)
 

 
(1,420
)
Income tax benefit
39,284

 

 

 

 
39,284

Income (loss) from continuing operations
446,140

 
(99,607
)
 
502,551

 
(459,545
)
 
389,539

Discontinued operations
(46,877
)
 
34,748

 
23,232

 

 
11,103

Gain on real estate dispositions
18,580

 

 

 

 
18,580

Net income (loss)
417,843

 
(64,859
)
 
525,783

 
(459,545
)
 
419,222

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 
1,379

 

 
1,379

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
$
417,843

 
$
(64,859
)
 
$
524,404

 
$
(459,545
)
 
$
417,843

    
(1)
Certain of Ventas Realty’s outstanding senior notes were issued jointly with our 100% owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation, which has no assets or operations.


133

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
Ventas, Inc.
 
Ventas
Realty (1)
 
Ventas Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated
Elimination
 
Consolidated
 
(In thousands)
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
2,789

 
$
180,907

 
$
954,761

 
$

 
$
1,138,457

Resident fees and services

 

 
1,552,951

 

 
1,552,951

Medical office building and other services revenues

 

 
29,364

 

 
29,364

Income from loans and investments
3,052

 

 
48,726

 

 
51,778

Equity earnings in affiliates
480,267

 

 
199

 
(480,466
)
 

Interest and other income
3,314

 
26

 
923

 

 
4,263

Total revenues
489,422

 
180,933

 
2,586,924

 
(480,466
)
 
2,776,813

Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest
(18,210
)
 
185,983

 
124,292

 

 
292,065

Depreciation and amortization
5,860

 
15,743

 
703,613

 

 
725,216

Property-level operating expenses
1

 
481

 
1,194,906

 

 
1,195,388

Medical office building services costs

 

 
17,092

 

 
17,092

General, administrative and professional fees
3,910

 
19,792

 
98,036

 

 
121,738

(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt, net
(3
)
 
3

 
5,564

 

 
5,564

Merger-related expenses and deal costs
26,209

 
2,110

 
14,985

 

 
43,304

Other
9,732

 

 
16,011

 

 
25,743

Total expenses
27,499

 
224,112

 
2,174,499

 

 
2,426,110

Income (loss) before income (loss) from unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations and noncontrolling interest
461,923

 
(43,179
)
 
412,425

 
(480,466
)
 
350,703

Income (loss) from unconsolidated entities

 
1,250

 
(1,389
)
 

 
(139
)
Income tax benefit
8,732

 

 

 

 
8,732

Income from continuing operations
470,655

 
(41,929
)
 
411,036

 
(480,466
)
 
359,296

Discontinued operations
(12,858
)
 
61,755

 
50,838

 

 
99,735

Gain on real estate dispositions
17,970

 

 

 

 
17,970

Net income
475,767

 
19,826

 
461,874

 
(480,466
)
 
477,001

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 
1,234

 

 
1,234

Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
475,767

 
$
19,826

 
$
460,640

 
$
(480,466
)
 
$
475,767

    
(1)
Certain of Ventas Realty’s outstanding senior notes were issued jointly with our 100% owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation, which has no assets or operations.


134

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
Ventas, Inc.
 
Ventas
Realty (1)
 
Ventas Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated
Elimination
 
Consolidated
 
(In thousands)
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
2,486

 
$
171,953

 
$
861,917

 
$

 
$
1,036,356

Resident fees and services

 

 
1,406,005

 

 
1,406,005

Medical office building and other services revenues

 
(11
)
 
17,820

 

 
17,809

Income from loans and investments
1,262

 
908

 
52,255

 

 
54,425

Equity earnings in affiliates
449,621

 

 
727

 
(450,348
)
 

Interest and other income
2,963

 
26

 
(967
)
 

 
2,022

Total revenues
456,332

 
172,876

 
2,337,757

 
(450,348
)
 
2,516,617

Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest
(2,167
)
 
144,327

 
106,849

 

 
249,009

Depreciation and amortization
4,990

 
17,248

 
607,670

 

 
629,908

Property-level operating expenses

 
514

 
1,109,411

 

 
1,109,925

Medical office building services costs

 

 
8,315

 

 
8,315

General, administrative and professional fees
2,695

 
20,488

 
91,900

 

 
115,083

Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt, net
3

 
1,510

 
(312
)
 

 
1,201

Merger-related expenses and deal costs
11,917

 

 
9,717

 

 
21,634

Other
194

 
17

 
17,153

 

 
17,364

Total expenses
17,632

 
184,104

 
1,950,703

 

 
2,152,439

Income (loss) before income (loss) from unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations, and noncontrolling interest
438,700

 
(11,228
)
 
387,054

 
(450,348
)
 
364,178

Income (loss) from unconsolidated entities

 
673

 
(1,181
)
 

 
(508
)
Income tax benefit
11,828

 

 

 

 
11,828

Income (loss) from continuing operations
450,528

 
(10,555
)
 
385,873

 
(450,348
)
 
375,498

Discontinued operations
2,981

 
83,197

 
(7,007
)
 

 
79,171

Net income
453,509

 
72,642

 
378,866

 
(450,348
)
 
454,669

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 
1,160

 

 
1,160

Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
453,509

 
$
72,642

 
$
377,706

 
$
(450,348
)
 
$
453,509

    
(1)
Certain of Ventas Realty’s outstanding senior notes were issued jointly with our 100% owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation, which has no assets or operations.


135

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
 
Ventas, Inc.
 
Ventas
Realty (1)
 
Ventas Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated
Elimination
 
Consolidated
 
(In thousands)
Net income (loss)
$
417,843

 
$
(64,859
)
 
$
525,783

 
$
(459,545
)
 
$
419,222

Other comprehensive loss:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation

 

 
(14,792
)
 

 
(14,792
)
Change in unrealized gain on marketable debt securities
(5,047
)
 

 

 

 
(5,047
)
Other

 

 
(847
)
 

 
(847
)
Total other comprehensive loss
(5,047
)
 

 
(15,639
)
 

 
(20,686
)
Comprehensive income (loss)
412,796

 
(64,859
)
 
510,144

 
(459,545
)
 
398,536

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 
1,379

 

 
1,379

Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders
$
412,796

 
$
(64,859
)
 
$
508,765

 
$
(459,545
)
 
$
397,157

    
(1)
Certain of Ventas Realty’s outstanding senior notes were issued jointly with our 100% owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation, which has no assets or operations.


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31, 2014

 
Ventas, Inc.
 
Ventas
Realty (1)
 
Ventas Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated
Elimination
 
Consolidated
 
(In thousands)
Net income
$
475,767

 
$
19,826

 
$
461,874

 
$
(480,466
)
 
$
477,001

Other comprehensive income (loss):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation

 

 
(17,153
)
 

 
(17,153
)
Change in unrealized gain on marketable debt securities
7,001

 

 

 

 
7,001

Other

 

 
3,614

 

 
3,614

Total other comprehensive income (loss)
7,001

 

 
(13,539
)
 

 
(6,538
)
Comprehensive income
482,768

 
19,826

 
448,335

 
(480,466
)
 
470,463

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 
1,234

 

 
1,234

Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders
$
482,768

 
$
19,826

 
$
447,101

 
$
(480,466
)
 
$
469,229

    
(1)
Certain of Ventas Realty’s outstanding senior notes were issued jointly with our 100% owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation, which has no assets or operations.


136

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013

 
Ventas, Inc.
 
Ventas
Realty (1)
 
Ventas Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated
Elimination
 
Consolidated
 
(In thousands)
Net income
$
453,509

 
$
72,642

 
$
378,866

 
$
(450,348
)
 
$
454,669

Other comprehensive loss:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation

 

 
(5,422
)
 

 
(5,422
)
Change in unrealized gain on marketable debt securities
(1,023
)
 

 

 

 
(1,023
)
Other

 

 
2,750

 

 
2,750

Total other comprehensive loss
(1,023
)
 

 
(2,672
)
 

 
(3,695
)
Comprehensive income
452,486

 
72,642

 
376,194

 
(450,348
)
 
450,974

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 
1,160

 

 
1,160

Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders
$
452,486

 
$
72,642

 
$
375,034

 
$
(450,348
)
 
$
449,814

    
(1)
Certain of Ventas Realty’s outstanding senior notes were issued jointly with our 100% owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation, which has no assets or operations.



137

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
 
Ventas, Inc.
 
Ventas
Realty (1)
 
Ventas Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated
Elimination
 
Consolidated
 
(In thousands)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
$
(124,752
)
 
$
(6,704
)
 
$
1,523,223

 
$

 
$
1,391,767

Net cash used in investing activities
(2,107,862
)
 
(15,733
)
 
(300,097
)
 

 
(2,423,692
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net change in borrowings under credit facilities

 
(584,000
)
 
(139,457
)
 

 
(723,457
)
Net cash impact of CCP Spin-Off
1,273,000

 

 
(1,401,749
)
 

 
(128,749
)
Proceeds from debt

 
2,292,568

 
220,179

 

 
2,512,747

Proceeds from debt related to CCP Spin-Off

 

 
1,400,000

 

 
1,400,000

Repayment of debt

 
(705,000
)
 
(730,596
)
 

 
(1,435,596
)
Net change in intercompany debt
1,782,954

 
(1,008,773
)
 
(774,181
)
 

 

Purchase of noncontrolling interest

 

 
(3,819
)
 

 
(3,819
)
Payment of deferred financing costs

 
(22,297
)
 
(2,368
)
 

 
(24,665
)
Issuance of common stock, net
491,023

 

 

 

 
491,023

Cash distribution (to) from affiliates
(313,755
)
 
49,939

 
263,816

 

 

Cash distribution to common stockholders
(1,003,413
)
 

 

 

 
(1,003,413
)
Cash distribution to redeemable OP unitholders

 

 
(15,095
)
 

 
(15,095
)
Purchases of redeemable OP units

 

 
(33,188
)
 

 
(33,188
)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest

 

 
(12,649
)
 

 
(12,649
)
Other
6,983

 

 

 

 
6,983

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
2,236,792

 
22,437

 
(1,229,107
)
 

 
1,030,122

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
4,178

 

 
(5,981
)
 

 
(1,803
)
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents
(17,302
)
 

 
16,780

 

 
(522
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
24,857

 

 
30,491

 

 
55,348

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
11,733

 
$

 
$
41,290

 
$

 
$
53,023

    
(1)
Certain of Ventas Realty’s outstanding senior notes were issued jointly with our 100% owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation, which has no assets or operations.


138

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
Ventas, Inc.
 
Ventas
Realty (1)
 
Ventas Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated
Elimination
 
Consolidated
 
(In thousands)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
$
(95,660
)
 
$
81,378

 
$
1,269,127

 
$

 
$
1,254,845

Net cash used in investing activities
(1,358,256
)
 
(7,749
)
 
(689,035
)
 

 
(2,055,040
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net change in borrowings under revolving credit facility

 
386,000

 
154,203

 

 
540,203

Proceeds from debt

 
696,661

 
1,311,046

 

 
2,007,707

Repayment of debt

 

 
(1,151,395
)
 

 
(1,151,395
)
Net change in intercompany debt
1,300,790

 
(895,961
)
 
(404,829
)
 

 

Payment of deferred financing costs

 
(6,608
)
 
(7,612
)
 

 
(14,220
)
Issuance of common stock, net
242,107

 

 

 

 
242,107

Cash distribution from (to) affiliates
776,826

 
(253,726
)
 
(523,100
)
 

 

Cash distribution to common stockholders
(875,614
)
 

 

 

 
(875,614
)
Cash distribution to redeemable OP unitholders
(5,762
)
 

 

 

 
(5,762
)
Purchases of redeemable OP units
(503
)
 

 

 

 
(503
)
Contributions from noncontrolling interest

 

 
491

 

 
491

Distributions to noncontrolling interest

 

 
(9,559
)
 

 
(9,559
)
Other
24,597

 
5

 

 

 
24,602

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
1,462,441

 
(73,629
)
 
(630,755
)
 

 
758,057

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
8,525

 

 
(50,663
)
 

 
(42,138
)
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents
(11,837
)
 

 
14,507

 

 
2,670

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
28,169

 

 
66,647

 

 
94,816

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
24,857

 
$

 
$
30,491

 
$

 
$
55,348

    
(1)
Certain of Ventas Realty’s outstanding senior notes were issued jointly with our 100% owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation, which has no assets or operations.


139

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
Ventas, Inc.
 
Ventas
Realty (1)
 
Ventas Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated
Elimination
 
Consolidated
 
(In thousands)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
$
(8,596
)
 
$
149,734

 
$
1,053,617

 
$

 
$
1,194,755

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
(1,416,336
)
 
(6,122
)
 
139,698

 

 
(1,282,760
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net change in borrowings under revolving credit facilities

 
(168,000
)
 
3,971

 

 
(164,029
)
Proceeds from debt

 
2,330,435

 
437,111

 

 
2,767,546

Repayment of debt

 
(400,000
)
 
(1,392,492
)
 

 
(1,792,492
)
Net change in intercompany debt
2,149,080

 
(1,881,988
)
 
(267,092
)
 

 

Payment of deferred financing costs

 
(29,586
)
 
(1,691
)
 

 
(31,277
)
Issuance of common stock, net
141,343

 

 

 

 
141,343

Cash distribution (to) from affiliates
(54,852
)
 
5,610

 
49,242

 

 

Cash distribution to common stockholders
(802,123
)
 

 

 

 
(802,123
)
Cash distribution to redeemable OP unitholders
(5,040
)
 

 

 

 
(5,040
)
Purchases of redeemable OP units
(659
)
 

 

 

 
(659
)
Contributions from noncontrolling interest

 

 
2,395

 

 
2,395

Distributions to noncontrolling interest

 

 
(9,286
)
 

 
(9,286
)
Other
8,618

 

 

 

 
8,618

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
1,436,367

 
(143,529
)
 
(1,177,842
)
 

 
114,996

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
11,435

 
83

 
15,473

 

 
26,991

Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents

 
(83
)
 

 

 
(83
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
16,734

 

 
51,174

 

 
67,908

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
28,169

 
$

 
$
66,647

 
$

 
$
94,816

    
(1)
Certain of Ventas Realty’s outstanding senior notes were issued jointly with our 100% owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation, which has no assets or operations.


140

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



VENTAS, INC.
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
December 31, 2015
(Dollars in Thousands)
Allowance Accounts
 
 
 
Additions
 
Deductions
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
Balance at Beginning of Year
 
Charged to Earnings
 
Acquired Properties
 
Uncollectible Accounts Written-off
 
Disposed Properties
 
Balance at End of Year
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts
 
11,460

 
10,937

 
753

 
(12,977
)
 
3,373

 
$
13,546

Straight-line rent receivable allowance
 
83,461

 
35,448

 

 

 
(17,491
)
 
$
101,418

 
 
94,921

 
46,385

 
753

 
(12,977
)
 
(14,118
)
 
114,964

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts
 
9,624

 
8,204

 

 
(4,272
)
 
(2,096
)
 
$
11,460

Straight-line rent receivable allowance
 
60,787

 
46,503

 

 
462

 
(24,291
)
 
$
83,461

 
 
70,411

 
54,707

 

 
(3,810
)
 
(26,387
)
 
94,921

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts
 
11,090

 
6,071

 

 
(6,013
)
 
(1,524
)
 
$
9,624

Straight-line rent receivable allowance
 
59,731

 
42,940

 

 
(1,252
)
 
(40,632
)
 
$
60,787

 
 
70,821

 
49,011

 

 
(7,265
)
 
(42,156
)
 
70,411

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


141



VENTAS, INC.
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2015
(Dollars in Thousands)


 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Reconciliation of real estate:
 
 
 
 
 
Carrying cost:
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of period
$
19,241,735

 
$
20,393,411

 
$
18,763,903

Additions during period:
 
 
 
 
 
Acquisitions
4,063,355

 
1,769,790

 
1,623,648

Capital expenditures
229,560

 
189,711

 
183,929

Dispositions:
 
 
 
 
 
Sales and/or transfers to assets held for sale
(867,158
)
 
(3,023,401
)
 
(155,184
)
Foreign currency translation
(209,460
)
 
(87,776
)
 
(22,885
)
Balance at end of period
$
22,458,032

 
$
19,241,735

 
$
20,393,411

 
 
 
 
 
 
Accumulated depreciation:
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of period
$
2,925,508

 
$
2,881,950

 
$
2,289,783

Additions during period:
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation expense
778,419

 
725,485

 
674,141

Dispositions:
 
 
 
 
 
Sales and/or transfers to assets held for sale
(144,545
)
 
(675,846
)
 
(78,061
)
Foreign currency translation
(14,757
)
 
(6,081
)
 
(3,913
)
Balance at end of period
$
3,544,625

 
$
2,925,508

 
$
2,881,950



142


VENTAS, INC.
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2015
(Dollars in Thousands)

 
 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
 
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
KINDRED SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Canyonwood Nursing and Rehab Center
 
Redding
CA

401

3,784


401

3,784

4,185

2,295

1,890

1989
1989
45 years
The Tunnell Center for Rehabilitation & Heathcare
 
San Francisco
CA

1,902

7,531


1,902

7,531

9,433

6,081

3,352

1967
1993
28 years
Lawton Healthcare Center
 
San Francisco
CA

943

514


943

514

1,457

513

944

1962
1996
20 years
Valley Gardens Health Care & Rehabilitation Center
 
Stockton
CA

516

3,405


516

3,405

3,921

2,133

1,788

1988
1988
29 years
Aurora Care Center
 
Aurora
CO

197

2,328


197

2,328

2,525

1,826

699

1962
1995
30 years
Lafayette Nursing and Rehab Center
 
Fayetteville
GA

598

6,623


598

6,623

7,221

6,528

693

1989
1995
20 years
Canyon West Health and Rehabilitation Center
 
Caldwell
ID

312

2,050


312

2,050

2,362

1,017

1,345

1974
1998
45 years
Mountain Valley Care & Rehabilitation Center
 
Kellogg
ID

68

1,280


68

1,280

1,348

1,310

38

1971
1984
25 years
Lewiston Rehabilitation & Care Center
 
Lewiston
ID

133

3,982


133

3,982

4,115

3,593

522

1964
1984
29 years
Aspen Park Healthcare
 
Moscow
ID

261

2,571


261

2,571

2,832

2,577

255

1955
1990
25 years
Nampa Care Center
 
Nampa
ID

252

2,810


252

2,810

3,062

2,712

350

1950
1983
25 years
Weiser Rehabilitation & Care Center
 
Weiser
ID

157

1,760


157

1,760

1,917

1,827

90

1963
1983
25 years
Wedgewood Healthcare Center
 
Clarksville
IN

119

5,115


119

5,115

5,234

3,659

1,575

1985
1995
35 years
Columbus Health and Rehabilitation Center
 
Columbus
IN

345

6,817


345

6,817

7,162

6,668

494

1966
1991
25 years
Harrison Health and Rehabilitation Centre
 
Corydon
IN

125

6,068


125

6,068

6,193

2,448

3,745

1998
1998
45 years
Valley View Health Care Center
 
Elkhart
IN

87

2,665


87

2,665

2,752

2,429

323

1985
1993
25 years
Wildwood Health Care Center
 
Indianapolis
IN

134

4,983


134

4,983

5,117

4,515

602

1988
1993
25 years
Windsor Estates Health & Rehab Center
 
Kokomo
IN

256

6,625


256

6,625

6,881

4,595

2,286

1962
1995
35 years
Rolling Hills Health Care Center
 
New Albany
IN

81

1,894


81

1,894

1,975

1,730

245

1984
1993
25 years
Southwood Health & Rehabilitation Center
 
Terre Haute
IN

90

2,868

(8
)
82

2,868

2,950

2,613

337

1988
1993
25 years

143


 
 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
 
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Maple Manor Health Care Center
 
Greenville
KY

59

3,187


59

3,187

3,246

2,728

518

1968
1990
30 years
Eagle Pond Rehabilitation and Living Center
 
South Dennis
MA

296

6,896


296

6,896

7,192

4,129

3,063

1985
1987
50 years
Harrington House Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
 
Walpole
MA

4

4,444


4

4,444

4,448

2,483

1,965

1991
1991
45 years
Parkview Acres Care and Rehabilitation Center
 
Dillon
MT

207

2,578


207

2,578

2,785

2,064

721

1965
1993
29 years
Park Place Health Care Center
 
Great Falls
MT

600

6,311


600

6,311

6,911

5,035

1,876

1963
1993
28 years
Greenbriar Terrace Healthcare
 
Nashua
NH

776

6,011


776

6,011

6,787

5,775

1,012

1963
1990
25 years
Rose Manor Healthcare Center
 
Durham
NC

200

3,527


200

3,527

3,727

3,298

429

1972
1991
26 years
Guardian Care of Elizabeth City
 
Elizabeth City
NC

71

561


71

561

632

632


1977
1982
20 years
Guardian Care of Henderson
 
Henderson
NC

206

1,997


206

1,997

2,203

1,590

613

1957
1993
29 years
Birchwood Terrace Healthcare
 
Burlington
VT

15

4,656


15

4,656

4,671

4,662

9

1965
1990
27 years
Nansemond Pointe Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
 
Suffolk
VA

534

6,990


534

6,990

7,524

5,357

2,167

1963
1991
32 years
River Pointe Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
 
Virginia Beach
VA

770

4,440


770

4,440

5,210

4,396

814

1953
1991
25 years
Bay Pointe Medical and Rehabilitation Center
 
Virginia Beach
VA

805

2,886

(380
)
425

2,886

3,311

2,242

1,069

1971
1993
29 years
Arden Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
 
Seattle
WA

1,111

4,013


1,111

4,013

5,124

3,202

1,922

1950
1993
28.5 years
Lakewood Healthcare Center
 
Tacoma
WA

504

3,511


504

3,511

4,015

2,370

1,645

1989
1989
45 years
Vancouver Health & Rehabilitation Center
 
Vancouver
WA

449

2,964


449

2,964

3,413

2,426

987

1970
1993
28 years
TOTAL KINDRED SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES
 
 
 

13,584

140,645

(388
)
13,196

140,645

153,841

113,458

40,383

 
 
 
NON-KINDRED SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
Cherry Hills Health Care Center
 
Englewood
CO

241

2,180

194

241

2,374

2,615

1,823

792

1960
1995
30 years
Brookdale Lisle SNF
 
Lisle
IL

730

9,270


730

9,270

10,000

2,373

7,627

1990
2009
35 years
Lopatcong Center
 
Phillipsburg
NJ

1,490

12,336


1,490

12,336

13,826

5,247

8,579

1982
2004
30 years
Marietta Convalescent Center
 
Marietta
OH

158

3,266

75

158

3,341

3,499

3,065

434

1972
1993
25 years
The Belvedere
 
Chester
PA

822

7,203


822

7,203

8,025

3,052

4,973

1899
2004
30 years
Pennsburg Manor
 
Pennsburg
PA

1,091

7,871


1,091

7,871

8,962

3,393

5,569

1982
2004
30 years
Chapel Manor
 
Philadelphia
PA

1,595

13,982

1,358

1,595

15,340

16,935

6,575

10,360

1948
2004
30 years
Wayne Center
 
Strafford
PA

662

6,872

850

662

7,722

8,384

3,495

4,889

1897
2004
30 years

144


 
 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
 
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Everett Rehabilitation & Care
 
Everett
WA

2,750

27,337


2,750

27,337

30,087

3,829

26,258

1995
2011
35 years
Northwest Continuum Care Center
 
Longview
WA

145

2,563

171

145

2,734

2,879

2,147

732

1955
1992
29 years
SunRise Care & Rehab Moses Lake
 
Moses Lake
WA

660

17,439


660

17,439

18,099

2,526

15,573

1972
2011
35 years
SunRise Care & Rehab Lake Ridge
 
Moses Lake
WA

660

8,866


660

8,866

9,526

1,345

8,181

1988
2011
35 years
Rainier Vista Care Center
 
Puyallup
WA

520

4,780

305

520

5,085

5,605

2,998

2,607

1986
1991
40 years
Logan Center
 
Logan
WV

300

12,959


300

12,959

13,259

1,833

11,426

1987
2011
35 years
Ravenswood Healthcare Center
 
Ravenswood
WV

320

12,710


320

12,710

13,030

1,803

11,227

1987
2011
35 years
Valley Center
 
South Charleston
WV

750

24,115


750

24,115

24,865

3,459

21,406

1987
2011
35 years
White Sulphur
 
White Sulphur Springs
WV

250

13,055


250

13,055

13,305

1,864

11,441

1987
2011
35 years
TOTAL NON-KINDRED SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES
 
 
 

13,144

186,804

2,953

13,144

189,757

202,901

50,827

152,074

 
 
 
TOTAL FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES
 
 
 

26,728

327,449

2,565

26,340

330,402

356,742

164,285

192,457

 
 

SPECIALTY HOSPITALS
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Kindred Hospital - Arizona - Phoenix
 
Phoenix
AZ

226

3,359


226

3,359

3,585

2,696

889

1980
1992
30 years
Kindred Hospital - Tucson
 
Tucson
AZ

130

3,091


130

3,091

3,221

2,913

308

1969
1994
25 years
Kindred Hospital - Brea
 
Brea
CA

3,144

2,611


3,144

2,611

5,755

1,327

4,428

1990
1995
40 years
Kindred Hospital - Ontario
 
Ontario
CA

523

2,988


523

2,988

3,511

2,867

644

1950
1994
25 years
Kindred Hospital - San Diego
 
San Diego
CA

670

11,764


670

11,764

12,434

11,254

1,180

1965
1994
25 years
Kindred Hospital - San Francisco Bay Area
 
San Leandro
CA

2,735

5,870


2,735

5,870

8,605

6,093

2,512

1962
1993
25 years
Kindred Hospital - Westminster
 
Westminster
CA

727

7,384


727

7,384

8,111

7,561

550

1973
1993
20 years
Kindred Hospital - Denver
 
Denver
CO

896

6,367


896

6,367

7,263

6,695

568

1963
1994
20 years
Kindred Hospital - South Florida - Coral Gables
 
Coral Gables
FL

1,071

5,348


1,071

5,348

6,419

4,819

1,600

1956
1992
30 years
Kindred Hospital - South Florida Ft. Lauderdale
 
Fort Lauderdale
FL

1,758

14,080


1,758

14,080

15,838

13,624

2,214

1969
1989
30 years
Kindred Hospital - North Florida
 
Green Cove Springs
FL

145

4,613


145

4,613

4,758

4,388

370

1956
1994
20 years
Kindred Hospital - South Florida - Hollywood
 
Hollywood
FL

605

5,229


605

5,229

5,834

5,234

600

1937
1995
20 years
Kindred Hospital - Bay Area St. Petersburg
 
St. Petersburg
FL

1,401

16,706


1,401

16,706

18,107

14,108

3,999

1968
1997
40 years
Kindred Hospital - Central Tampa
 
Tampa
FL

2,732

7,676


2,732

7,676

10,408

4,939

5,469

1970
1993
40 years

145


 
 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
 
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Kindred Hospital - Chicago (North Campus)
 
Chicago
IL

1,583

19,980


1,583

19,980

21,563

19,156

2,407

1949
1995
25 years
Kindred - Chicago - Lakeshore
 
Chicago
IL

1,513

9,525


1,513

9,525

11,038

9,423

1,615

1995
1976
20 years
Kindred Hospital - Chicago (Northlake Campus)
 
Northlake
IL

850

6,498


850

6,498

7,348

5,819

1,529

1960
1991
30 years
Kindred Hospital - Sycamore
 
Sycamore
IL

77

8,549


77

8,549

8,626

8,099

527

1949
1993
20 years
Kindred Hospital - Indianapolis
 
Indianapolis
IN

985

3,801


985

3,801

4,786

3,355

1,431

1955
1993
30 years
Kindred Hospital - Louisville
 
Louisville
KY

3,041

12,279


3,041

12,279

15,320

12,131

3,189

1964
1995
20 years
Kindred Hospital - New Orleans
 
New Orleans
LA

648

4,971


648

4,971

5,619

4,465

1,154

1968
1978
20 years
Kindred Hospital - Boston
 
Brighton
MA

1,551

9,796


1,551

9,796

11,347

9,129

2,218

1930
1994
25 years
Kindred Hospital - Boston North Shore
 
Peabody
MA

543

7,568


543

7,568

8,111

5,553

2,558

1974
1993
40 years
Kindred Hospital - Kansas City
 
Kansas City
MO

277

2,914


277

2,914

3,191

2,639

552

1958
1992
30 years
Kindred Hospital - St. Louis
 
St. Louis
MO

1,126

2,087


1,126

2,087

3,213

1,873

1,340

1984
1991
40 years
Kindred Hospital - Las Vegas (Sahara)
 
Las Vegas
NV

1,110

2,177


1,110

2,177

3,287

1,349

1,938

1980
1994
40 years
Kindred Hospital - Albuquerque
 
Albuquerque
NM

11

4,253


11

4,253

4,264

2,796

1,468

1985
1993
40 years
Kindred Hospital - Greensboro
 
Greensboro
NC

1,010

7,586


1,010

7,586

8,596

7,603

993

1964
1994
20 years
Kindred Hospital - Oklahoma City
 
Oklahoma City
OK

293

5,607


293

5,607

5,900

4,543

1,357

1958
1993
30 years
Kindred Hospital - Pittsburgh
 
Oakdale
PA

662

12,854


662

12,854

13,516

9,854

3,662

1972
1996
40 years
Kindred Hospital - Philadelphia
 
Philadelphia
PA

135

5,223


135

5,223

5,358

3,220

2,138

1960
1995
35 years
Kindred Hospital - Chattanooga
 
Chattanooga
TN

756

4,415


756

4,415

5,171

4,043

1,128

1975
1993
22 years
Kindred Hospital - Tarrant County (Fort Worth Southwest)
 
Fort Worth
TX

2,342

7,458


2,342

7,458

9,800

7,493

2,307

1987
1986
20 years
Kindred Hospital - Fort Worth
 
Fort Worth
TX

648

10,608


648

10,608

11,256

8,734

2,522

1960
1994
34 years
Kindred Hospital (Houston Northwest)
 
Houston
TX

1,699

6,788


1,699

6,788

8,487

5,465

3,022

1986
1985
40 years
Kindred Hospital - Houston
 
Houston
TX

33

7,062


33

7,062

7,095

6,606

489

1972
1994
20 years
Kindred Hospital - Mansfield
 
Mansfield
TX

267

2,462


267

2,462

2,729

1,903

826

1983
1990
40 years
Kindred Hospital - San Antonio
 
San Antonio
TX

249

11,413


249

11,413

11,662

8,816

2,846

1981
1993
30 years
Southern Arizona Rehab
 
Tucson
AZ

770

25,589


770

25,589

26,359

3,437

22,922

1992
2011
35 years

146


 
 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
 
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital
 
Tustin
CA

2,810

25,248


2,810

25,248

28,058

3,456

24,602

1991
2011
35 years
Lovelace Rehabilitation Hospital
 
Albuquerque
NM

401

17,186


401

17,186

17,587

204

17,383

1989
2015
36 years
University Hospitals Rehabilitation Hospital
 
Beachwood
OH

1,800

16,444


1,800

16,444

18,244

1,297

16,947

2013
2013
35 years
Reliant Rehabilitation - Dallas TX
 
Dallas
TX

2,318

38,702


2,318

38,702

41,020

1,129

39,891

2009
2015
35 years
Baylor Institute for Rehabilition - Ft. Worth TX
 
Fort Worth
TX

2,071

16,018


2,071

16,018

18,089

507

17,582

2008
2015
35 years
Reliant Rehabilitation - Houston TX
 
Houston
TX

1,838

34,832


1,838

34,832

36,670

1,065

35,605

2012
2015
35 years
Select Rehabilitation - San Antonio TX
 
San Antonio
TX

1,859

18,301


1,859

18,301

20,160

568

19,592

2010
2015
35 years
TOTAL FOR SPECIALTY HOSPITALS
 
 
 

52,039

465,280


52,039

465,280

517,319

254,248

263,071

 
 
 
GENERAL ACUTE CARE HOSPITALS
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
Lovelace Medical Center Downtown
 
Albuquerque
NM

9,840

156,535


9,840

156,535

166,375

2,060

164,315

1968
2015
33.5 years
Lovelace Westside Hospital
 
Albuquerque
NM

10,107

18,501


10,107

18,501

28,608

537

28,071

1984
2015
20.5 years
Lovelace Women's Hospital
 
Albuquerque
NM

7,236

183,866


7,236

183,866

191,102

1,707

189,395

1983
2015
47 years
Roswell Regional Hospital
 
Roswell
NM

2,560

41,164


2,560

41,164

43,724

400

43,324

2007
2015
47 years
Hillcrest Hospital Claremore
 
Claremore
OK

3,623

34,359


3,623

34,359

37,982

407

37,575

1955
2015
40 years
Bailey Medical Center
 
Owasso
OK

4,964

8,969


4,964

8,969

13,933

157

13,776

2006
2015
32.5 years
Hillcrest Medical Center
 
Tulsa
OK

28,319

215,199


28,319

215,199

243,518

3,315

240,203

1928
2015
34 years
Hillcrest Hospital South
 
Tulsa
OK

17,026

100,892


17,026

100,892

117,918

1,134

116,784

1999
2015
40 years
Baptist St. Anthony's Hospital
 
Amarillo
TX

13,779

358,029


13,779

358,029

371,808

3,545

368,263

1967
2015
44.5 years
Spire Hull and East Riding Hospital
 
Anlaby
Hull

3,194

81,613

(4,563
)
3,022

77,222

80,244

2,761

77,483

2010
2014
50 years
Spire Fylde Coast Hospital
 
Blackpool
Lancashire

2,446

28,896

(1,687
)
2,314

27,341

29,655

992

28,663

1980
2014
50 years
Spire Clare Park Hospital
 
Farnham
Surrey

6,263

26,119

(1,743
)
5,926

24,713

30,639

932

29,707

2009
2014
50 years
TOTAL FOR GENERAL ACUTE CARE HOSPITALS
 
 
 

109,357

1,254,142

(7,993
)
108,716

1,246,790

1,355,506

17,947

1,337,559

 
 
 
TOTAL FOR HOSPITALS
 
 
 

161,396

1,719,422

(7,993
)
160,755

1,712,070

1,872,825

272,195

1,600,630

 
 
 
BROOKDALE SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
Sterling House of Chandler
 
Chandler
AZ

2,000

6,538


2,000

6,538

8,538

1,008

7,530

1998
2011
35 years
The Springs of East Mesa
 
Mesa
AZ

2,747

24,918


2,747

24,918

27,665

9,532

18,133

1986
2005
35 years
Sterling House of Mesa
 
Mesa
AZ

655

6,998


655

6,998

7,653

2,653

5,000

1998
2005
35 years
Clare Bridge of Oro Valley
 
Oro Valley
AZ

666

6,169


666

6,169

6,835

2,339

4,496

1998
2005
35 years

147


 
 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
 
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Sterling House of Peoria
 
Peoria
AZ

598

4,872


598

4,872

5,470

1,847

3,623

1998
2005
35 years
Clare Bridge of Tempe
 
Tempe
AZ

611

4,066


611

4,066

4,677

1,542

3,135

1997
2005
35 years
Sterling House on East Speedway
 
Tucson
AZ

506

4,745


506

4,745

5,251

1,799

3,452

1998
2005
35 years
Emeritus at Fairwood Manor
 
Anaheim
CA

2,464

7,908


2,464

7,908

10,372

2,717

7,655

1977
2005
35 years
Woodside Terrace
 
Redwood City
CA

7,669

66,691


7,669

66,691

74,360

25,743

48,617

1988
2005
35 years
The Atrium
 
San Jose
CA

6,240

66,329

12,838

6,240

79,167

85,407

25,003

60,404

1987
2005
35 years
Brookdale Place
 
San Marcos
CA

4,288

36,204


4,288

36,204

40,492

14,066

26,426

1987
2005
35 years
Emeritus at Heritage Place
 
Tracy
CA

1,110

13,296


1,110

13,296

14,406

4,234

10,172

1986
2005
35 years
Ridge Point Assisted Living Inn
 
Boulder
CO

1,290

20,683


1,290

20,683

21,973

2,959

19,014

1985
2011
35 years
Wynwood of Colorado Springs
 
Colorado Springs
CO

715

9,279


715

9,279

9,994

3,518

6,476

1997
2005
35 years
Wynwood of Pueblo
 
Pueblo
CO
4,938

840

9,403


840

9,403

10,243

3,565

6,678

1997
2005
35 years
The Gables at Farmington
 
Farmington
CT

3,995

36,310


3,995

36,310

40,305

13,885

26,420

1984
2005
35 years
Emeritus at South Windsor
 
South Windsor
CT

2,187

12,682


2,187

12,682

14,869

4,293

10,576

1999
2004
35 years
Chatfield
 
West Hartford
CT

2,493

22,833

10,457

2,493

33,290

35,783

8,718

27,065

1989
2005
35 years
Sterling House of Salina II
 
Bonita Springs
FL
8,895

1,540

10,783


1,540

10,783

12,323

4,031

8,292

1989
2005
35 years
Emeritus at Boynton Beach
 
Boynton Beach
FL
13,632

2,317

16,218


2,317

16,218

18,535

5,891

12,644

1999
2005
35 years
Emeritus at Deer Creek
 
Deerfield Beach
FL

1,399

9,791


1,399

9,791

11,190

3,889

7,301

1999
2005
35 years
Clare Bridge of Ft. Myers
 
Fort Myers
FL

1,510

7,862


1,510

7,862

9,372

1,119

8,253

1996
2011
35 years
Sterling House of Merrimac
 
Jacksonville
FL

860

16,745


860

16,745

17,605

2,283

15,322

1997
2011
35 years
Clare Bridge of Jacksonville
 
Jacksonville
FL

1,300

9,659


1,300

9,659

10,959

1,355

9,604

1997
2011
35 years
Emeritus at Jensen Beach
 
Jensen Beach
FL
12,232

1,831

12,820


1,831

12,820

14,651

4,777

9,874

1999
2005
35 years
Sterling House of Ormond Beach
 
Ormond Beach
FL

1,660

9,738


1,660

9,738

11,398

1,377

10,021

1997
2011
35 years
Sterling House of Palm Coast
 
Palm Coast
FL

470

9,187


470

9,187

9,657

1,311

8,346

1997
2011
35 years
Sterling House of Pensacola
 
Pensacola
FL

633

6,087


633

6,087

6,720

2,308

4,412

1998
2005
35 years
Sterling House of Englewood (FL)
 
Rotonda West
FL

1,740

4,331


1,740

4,331

6,071

745

5,326

1997
2011
35 years
Clare Bridge of Tallahassee
 
Tallahassee
FL
4,385

667

6,168


667

6,168

6,835

2,339

4,496

1998
2005
35 years
Sterling House of Tavares
 
Tavares
FL

280

15,980


280

15,980

16,260

2,189

14,071

1997
2011
35 years
Clare Bridge of West Melbourne
 
West Melbourne
FL
6,249

586

5,481


586

5,481

6,067

2,078

3,989

2000
2005
35 years
The Classic at West Palm Beach
 
West Palm Beach
FL
25,178

3,758

33,072


3,758

33,072

36,830

12,734

24,096

1990
2005
35 years
Clare Bridge Cottage of Winter Haven
 
Winter Haven
FL

232

3,006


232

3,006

3,238

1,140

2,098

1997
2005
35 years

148


 
 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
 
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Sterling House of Winter Haven
 
Winter Haven
FL

438

5,549


438

5,549

5,987

2,104

3,883

1997
2005
35 years
Wynwood of Twin Falls
 
Twin Falls
ID

703

6,153


703

6,153

6,856

2,333

4,523

1997
2005
35 years
The Hallmark
 
Chicago
IL

11,057

107,517

3,266

11,057

110,783

121,840

41,513

80,327

1990
2005
35 years
The Kenwood of Lake View
 
Chicago
IL

3,072

26,668


3,072

26,668

29,740

10,298

19,442

1950
2005
35 years
The Heritage
 
Des Plaines
IL
32,000

6,871

60,165


6,871

60,165

67,036

23,190

43,846

1993
2005
35 years
Devonshire of Hoffman Estates
 
Hoffman Estates
IL

3,886

44,130


3,886

44,130

48,016

16,171

31,845

1987
2005
35 years
The Devonshire
 
Lisle
IL
33,000

7,953

70,400


7,953

70,400

78,353

27,072

51,281

1990
2005
35 years
Seasons at Glenview
 
Northbrook
IL

1,988

39,762


1,988

39,762

41,750

13,784

27,966

1999
2004
35 years
Hawthorn Lakes
 
Vernon Hills
IL

4,439

35,044


4,439

35,044

39,483

13,825

25,658

1987
2005
35 years
The Willows
 
Vernon Hills
IL

1,147

10,041


1,147

10,041

11,188

3,870

7,318

1999
2005
35 years
Sterling House of Evansville
 
Evansville
IN
3,518

357

3,765


357

3,765

4,122

1,427

2,695

1998
2005
35 years
Berkshire of Castleton
 
Indianapolis
IN

1,280

11,515


1,280

11,515

12,795

4,413

8,382

1986
2005
35 years
Sterling House of Marion
 
Marion
IN

207

3,570


207

3,570

3,777

1,354

2,423

1998
2005
35 years
Sterling House of Portage
 
Portage
IN

128

3,649


128

3,649

3,777

1,384

2,393

1999
2005
35 years
Sterling House of Richmond
 
Richmond
IN

495

4,124


495

4,124

4,619

1,564

3,055

1998
2005
35 years
Sterling House of Derby
 
Derby
KS

440

4,422


440

4,422

4,862

645

4,217

1994
2011
35 years
Clare Bridge of Leawood
 
Leawood
KS
3,582

117

5,127


117

5,127

5,244

1,944

3,300

2000
2005
35 years

149


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Sterling House of Salina II
Salina
KS

300

5,657


300

5,657

5,957

830

5,127

1996
2011
35 years
Clare Bridge Cottage of Topeka
Topeka
KS
4,797

370

6,825


370

6,825

7,195

2,588

4,607

2000
2005
35 years
Sterling House of Wellington
Wellington
KS

310

2,434


310

2,434

2,744

389

2,355

1994
2011
35 years
Emeritus at Farm Pond
Framingham
MA

5,819

33,361

2,430

5,819

35,791

41,610

10,986

30,624

1999
2004
35 years
Emeritus at Cape Cod (WhiteHall)
Hyannis
MA

1,277

9,063


1,277

9,063

10,340

2,850

7,490

1999
2005
35 years
River Bay Club
Quincy
MA

6,101

57,862


6,101

57,862

63,963

21,934

42,029

1986
2005
35 years
Woven Hearts of Davison
Davison
MI

160

3,189

2,543

160

5,732

5,892

1,137

4,755

1997
2011
35 years
Clare Bridge of Delta Charter
Delta Township
MI

730

11,471


730

11,471

12,201

1,602

10,599

1998
2011
35 years
Woven Hearts of Delta Charter
Delta Township
MI

820

3,313


820

3,313

4,133

649

3,484

1998
2011
35 years
Clare Bridge of Farmington Hills I
Farmington Hills
MI

580

10,497


580

10,497

11,077

1,650

9,427

1994
2011
35 years
Clare Bridge of Farmington Hills II
Farmington Hills
MI

700

10,246


700

10,246

10,946

1,672

9,274

1994
2011
35 years
Wynwood of Meridian Lansing II
Haslett
MI

1,340

6,134


1,340

6,134

7,474

973

6,501

1998
2011
35 years
Clare Bridge of Grand Blanc I
Holly
MI

450

12,373


450

12,373

12,823

1,736

11,087

1998
2011
35 years
Wynwood of Grand Blanc II
Holly
MI

620

14,627


620

14,627

15,247

2,080

13,167

1998
2011
35 years
Wynwood of Northville
Northville
MI
7,055

407

6,068


407

6,068

6,475

2,301

4,174

1996
2005
35 years
Clare Bridge of Troy I
Troy
MI

630

17,178


630

17,178

17,808

2,376

15,432

1998
2011
35 years
Wynwood of Troy II
Troy
MI

950

12,503


950

12,503

13,453

1,865

11,588

1998
2011
35 years
Wynwood of Utica
Utica
MI

1,142

11,808


1,142

11,808

12,950

4,477

8,473

1996
2005
35 years
Clare Bridge of Utica
Utica
MI

700

8,657


700

8,657

9,357

1,290

8,067

1995
2011
35 years
Sterling House of Blaine
Blaine
MN

150

1,675


150

1,675

1,825

635

1,190

1997
2005
35 years
Clare Bridge of Eden Prairie
Eden Prairie
MN

301

6,228


301

6,228

6,529

2,361

4,168

1998
2005
35 years
Woven Hearts of Faribault
Faribault
MN

530

1,085


530

1,085

1,615

201

1,414

1997
2011
35 years
Sterling House of Inver Grove Heights
Inver Grove Heights
MN
2,791

253

2,655


253

2,655

2,908

1,007

1,901

1997
2005
35 years
Woven Hearts of Mankato
Mankato
MN

490

410


490

410

900

145

755

1996
2011
35 years
Edina Park Plaza
Minneapolis
MN
15,040

3,621

33,141

22,412

3,621

55,553

59,174

12,655

46,519

1998
2005
35 years
Clare Bridge of North Oaks
North Oaks
MN

1,057

8,296


1,057

8,296

9,353

3,145

6,208

1998
2005
35 years
Clare Bridge of Plymouth
Plymouth
MN

679

8,675


679

8,675

9,354

3,289

6,065

1998
2005
35 years
Woven Hearts of Sauk Rapids
Sauk Rapids
MN

480

3,178


480

3,178

3,658

474

3,184

1997
2011
35 years
Woven Hearts of Wilmar
Wilmar
MN

470

4,833


470

4,833

5,303

682

4,621

1997
2011
35 years
Woven Hearts of Winona
Winona
MN

800

1,390


800

1,390

2,190

402

1,788

1997
2011
35 years
The Solana West County
Ballwin
MO

3,100

35,074

16

3,100

35,090

38,190

1,601

36,589

2012
2014
35 years
Clare Bridge of Cary
Cary
NC

724

6,466


724

6,466

7,190

2,451

4,739

1997
2005
35 years
Sterling House of Hickory
Hickory
NC

330

10,981


330

10,981

11,311

1,537

9,774

1997
2011
35 years
Clare Bridge of Winston-Salem
Winston-Salem
NC

368

3,497


368

3,497

3,865

1,326

2,539

1997
2005
35 years

150


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Brendenwood
Voorhees Township
NJ
17,538

3,158

29,909


3,158

29,909

33,067

11,340

21,727

1987
2005
35 years
Clare Bridge of Westampton
Westampton
NJ

881

4,741


881

4,741

5,622

1,798

3,824

1997
2005
35 years
Sterling House of Deptford
Woodbury
NJ

1,190

5,482


1,190

5,482

6,672

855

5,817

1998
2011
35 years
Ponce de Leon
Santa Fe
NM


28,178



28,178

28,178

10,424

17,754

1986
2005
35 years
Wynwood of Kenmore
Buffalo
NY
13,154

1,487

15,170


1,487

15,170

16,657

5,751

10,906

1995
2005
35 years
Villas of Sherman Brook
Clinton
NY

947

7,528


947

7,528

8,475

2,854

5,621

1991
2005
35 years
Wynwood of Liberty (Manlius)
Manlius
NY

890

28,237


890

28,237

29,127

3,870

25,257

1994
2011
35 years
Clare Bridge of Perinton
Pittsford
NY

611

4,066


611

4,066

4,677

1,541

3,136

1997
2005
35 years
The Gables at Brighton
Rochester
NY

1,131

9,498


1,131

9,498

10,629

3,695

6,934

1988
2005
35 years
Clare Bridge of Niskayuna
Schenectady
NY

1,021

8,333


1,021

8,333

9,354

3,159

6,195

1997
2005
35 years
Wynwood of Niskayuna
Schenectady
NY
16,487

1,884

16,103


1,884

16,103

17,987

6,105

11,882

1996
2005
35 years
Villas of Summerfield
Syracuse
NY

1,132

11,434


1,132

11,434

12,566

4,335

8,231

1991
2005
35 years
Clare Bridge of Williamsville
Williamsville
NY
6,800

839

3,841


839

3,841

4,680

1,456

3,224

1997
2005
35 years
Sterling House of Alliance
Alliance
OH
2,222

392

6,283


392

6,283

6,675

2,382

4,293

1998
2005
35 years
Clare Bridge Cottage of Austintown
Austintown
OH

151

3,087


151

3,087

3,238

1,170

2,068

1999
2005
35 years
Sterling House of Barberton
Barberton
OH

440

10,884


440

10,884

11,324

1,525

9,799

1997
2011
35 years
Sterling House of Beaver Creek
Beavercreek
OH

587

5,381


587

5,381

5,968

2,040

3,928

1998
2005
35 years
Sterling House of Englewood (OH)
Clayton
OH

630

6,477


630

6,477

7,107

958

6,149

1997
2011
35 years
Sterling House of Westerville
Columbus
OH
1,829

267

3,600


267

3,600

3,867

1,365

2,502

1999
2005
35 years
Sterling House of Greenville
Greenville
OH

490

4,144


490

4,144

4,634

722

3,912

1997
2011
35 years
Sterling House of Lancaster
Lancaster
OH

460

4,662


460

4,662

5,122

725

4,397

1998
2011
35 years
Sterling House of Marion
Marion
OH

620

3,306


620

3,306

3,926

555

3,371

1998
2011
35 years
Sterling House of Salem
Salem
OH

634

4,659


634

4,659

5,293

1,766

3,527

1998
2005
35 years
Sterling House of Springdale
Springdale
OH

1,140

9,134


1,140

9,134

10,274

1,300

8,974

1997
2011
35 years
Sterling House of Bartlesville
Bartlesville
OK

250

10,529


250

10,529

10,779

1,451

9,328

1997
2011
35 years
Sterling House of Bethany
Bethany
OK

390

1,499


390

1,499

1,889

274

1,615

1994
2011
35 years
Sterling House of Broken Arrow
Broken Arrow
OK

940

6,312

6,410

1,873

11,789

13,662

1,485

12,177

1996
2011
35 years
Forest Grove Residential Community
Forest Grove
OR

2,320

9,633


2,320

9,633

11,953

1,512

10,441

1994
2011
35 years
The Heritage at Mt. Hood
Gresham
OR

2,410

9,093


2,410

9,093

11,503

1,427

10,076

1988
2011
35 years
McMinnville Residential Estates
McMinnville
OR
1,552

1,230

7,561


1,230

7,561

8,791

1,317

7,474

1989
2011
35 years
Sterling House of Denton
Denton
TX

1,750

6,712


1,750

6,712

8,462

968

7,494

1996
2011
35 years
Sterling House of Ennis
Ennis
TX

460

3,284


460

3,284

3,744

520

3,224

1996
2011
35 years
Sterling House of Kerrville
Kerrville
TX

460

8,548


460

8,548

9,008

1,200

7,808

1997
2011
35 years
Sterling House of Lancaster
Lancaster
TX

410

1,478


410

1,478

1,888

295

1,593

1997
2011
35 years
Sterling House of Paris
Paris
TX

360

2,411


360

2,411

2,771

415

2,356

1996
2011
35 years
Sterling House of San Antonio
San Antonio
TX

1,400

10,051


1,400

10,051

11,451

1,433

10,018

1997
2011
35 years

151


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Sterling House of Temple
Temple
TX

330

5,081


330

5,081

5,411

770

4,641

1997
2011
35 years
Emeritus at Ridgewood Gardens
Salem
VA

1,900

16,219


1,900

16,219

18,119

5,743

12,376

1998
2011
35 years
Clare Bridge of Lynwood
Lynnwood
WA

1,219

9,573


1,219

9,573

10,792

3,630

7,162

1999
2005
35 years
Clare Bridge of Puyallup
Puyallup
WA
9,587

1,055

8,298


1,055

8,298

9,353

3,146

6,207

1998
2005
35 years
Columbia Edgewater
Richland
WA

960

23,270


960

23,270

24,230

3,360

20,870

1990
2011
35 years
Park Place
Spokane
WA

1,622

12,895


1,622

12,895

14,517

5,079

9,438

1915
2005
35 years
Crossings at Allenmore
Tacoma
WA

620

16,186


620

16,186

16,806

2,257

14,549

1997
2011
35 years
Union Park at Allenmore
Tacoma
WA

1,710

3,326


1,710

3,326

5,036

754

4,282

1988
2011
35 years
Crossings at Yakima
Yakima
WA

860

15,276


860

15,276

16,136

2,197

13,939

1998
2011
35 years
Sterling House of Fond du Lac
Fond du Lac
WI

196

1,603


196

1,603

1,799

608

1,191

2000
2005
35 years
Clare Bridge of Kenosha
Kenosha
WI

551

5,431

2,772

551

8,203

8,754

2,643

6,111

2000
2005
35 years
Woven Hearts of Kenosha
Kenosha
WI

630

1,694


630

1,694

2,324

283

2,041

1997
2011
35 years
Clare Bridge Cottage of La Crosse
La Crosse
WI

621

4,056

1,126

621

5,182

5,803

1,775

4,028

2004
2005
35 years
Sterling House of La Crosse
La Crosse
WI

644

5,831

2,637

644

8,468

9,112

2,768

6,344

1998
2005
35 years
Sterling House of Middleton
Middleton
WI

360

5,041


360

5,041

5,401

714

4,687

1997
2011
35 years
Woven Hearts of Neenah
Neenah
WI

340

1,030


340

1,030

1,370

194

1,176

1996
2011
35 years
Woven Hearts of Onalaska
Onalaska
WI

250

4,949


250

4,949

5,199

697

4,502

1995
2011
35 years
Woven Hearts of Oshkosh
Oshkosh
WI

160

1,904


160

1,904

2,064

310

1,754

1996
2011
35 years
Woven Hearts of Sun Prairie
Sun Prairie
WI

350

1,131


350

1,131

1,481

207

1,274

1994
2011
35 years
TOTAL FOR BROOKDALE SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES
 
 
246,461

190,934

1,803,345

66,907

191,867

1,869,319

2,061,186

562,297

1,498,889

 
 
 
SUNRISE SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Sunrise of Chandler
Chandler
AZ

4,344

14,455

448

4,439

14,808

19,247

1,980

17,267

2007
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Scottsdale
Scottsdale
AZ

2,229

27,575

511

2,255

28,060

30,315

7,375

22,940

2007
2007
35 years
Sunrise of River Road
Tucson
AZ

2,971

12,399

102

2,971

12,501

15,472

1,545

13,927

2008
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Lynn Valley
Vancouver
BC

11,759

37,424

(13,159
)
8,445

27,579

36,024

7,210

28,814

2002
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Vancouver
Vancouver
BC

6,649

31,937

313

6,661

32,238

38,899

8,746

30,153

2005
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Victoria
Victoria
BC

8,332

29,970

(10,044
)
5,999

22,259

28,258

5,924

22,334

2001
2007
35 years
Sunrise at La Costa
Carlsbad
CA

4,890

20,590

1,276

4,960

21,796

26,756

6,293

20,463

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Carmichael
Carmichael
CA

1,269

14,598

247

1,269

14,845

16,114

1,903

14,211

2009
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Fair Oaks
Fair Oaks
CA

1,456

23,679

1,680

2,271

24,544

26,815

6,792

20,023

2001
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Mission Viejo
Mission Viejo
CA

3,802

24,560

1,234

3,827

25,769

29,596

7,162

22,434

1998
2007
35 years
Sunrise at Canyon Crest
Riverside
CA

5,486

19,658

1,531

5,530

21,145

26,675

5,801

20,874

2006
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Rocklin
Rocklin
CA

1,378

23,565

731

1,411

24,263

25,674

6,442

19,232

2007
2007
35 years
Sunrise of San Mateo
San Mateo
CA

2,682

35,335

1,320

2,695

36,642

39,337

9,672

29,665

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Sunnyvale
Sunnyvale
CA

2,933

34,361

821

2,948

35,167

38,115

9,330

28,785

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise at Sterling Canyon
Valencia
CA

3,868

29,293

4,146

3,995

33,312

37,307

9,469

27,838

1998
2007
35 years

152


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Sunrise of Westlake Village
Westlake Village
CA

4,935

30,722

903

5,006

31,554

36,560

8,363

28,197

2004
2007
35 years
Sunrise at Yorba Linda
Yorba Linda
CA

1,689

25,240

1,219

1,755

26,393

28,148

6,952

21,196

2002
2007
35 years
Sunrise at Cherry Creek
Denver
CO

1,621

28,370

1,060

1,703

29,348

31,051

7,904

23,147

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise at Pinehurst
Denver
CO

1,417

30,885

1,727

1,596

32,433

34,029

9,070

24,959

1998
2007
35 years
Sunrise at Orchard
Littleton
CO

1,813

22,183

1,210

1,846

23,360

25,206

6,569

18,637

1997
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Westminster
Westminster
CO

2,649

16,243

1,387

2,686

17,593

20,279

4,846

15,433

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Stamford
Stamford
CT

4,612

28,533

1,518

4,648

30,015

34,663

8,438

26,225

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Jacksonville
Jacksonville
FL

2,390

17,671

119

2,405

17,775

20,180

2,314

17,866

2009
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Ivey Ridge
Alpharetta
GA

1,507

18,516

1,108

1,513

19,618

21,131

5,467

15,664

1998
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Huntcliff I
Atlanta
GA

4,232

66,161

15,067

4,185

81,275

85,460

21,207

64,253

1987
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Huntcliff II
Atlanta
GA

2,154

17,137

1,650

2,160

18,781

20,941

5,352

15,589

1998
2007
35 years
Sunrise at East Cobb
Marietta
GA

1,797

23,420

1,346

1,799

24,764

26,563

6,783

19,780

1997
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Barrington
Barrington
IL

859

15,085

378

867

15,455

16,322

2,008

14,314

2007
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Bloomingdale
Bloomingdale
IL

1,287

38,625

1,523

1,382

40,053

41,435

10,637

30,798

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Buffalo Grove
Buffalo Grove
IL

2,154

28,021

1,040

2,272

28,943

31,215

7,933

23,282

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Lincoln Park
Chicago
IL

3,485

26,687

829

3,504

27,497

31,001

7,111

23,890

2003
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Naperville
Naperville
IL

1,946

28,538

2,435

1,995

30,924

32,919

8,374

24,545

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Palos Park
Palos Park
IL

2,363

42,205

927

2,369

43,126

45,495

11,475

34,020

2001
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Park Ridge
Park Ridge
IL

5,533

39,557

1,906

5,630

41,366

46,996

10,910

36,086

1998
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Willowbrook
Willowbrook
IL

1,454

60,738

2,142

2,047

62,287

64,334

14,882

49,452

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Old Meridian
Carmel
IN

8,550

31,746

217

8,550

31,963

40,513

4,127

36,386

2009
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Leawood
Leawood
KS

651

16,401

438

768

16,722

17,490

1,999

15,491

2006
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Overland Park
Overland Park
KS

650

11,015

350

660

11,355

12,015

1,506

10,509

2007
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Baton Rouge
Baton Rouge
LA

1,212

23,547

1,267

1,321

24,705

26,026

6,625

19,401

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Arlington
Arlington
MA

86

34,393

846

107

35,218

35,325

9,631

25,694

2001
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Norwood
Norwood
MA

2,230

30,968

1,642

2,306

32,534

34,840

8,683

26,157

1997
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Columbia
Columbia
MD

1,780

23,083

1,853

1,855

24,861

26,716

6,804

19,912

1996
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Rockville
Rockville
MD

1,039

39,216

1,634

1,066

40,823

41,889

10,443

31,446

1997
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Bloomfield
Bloomfield Hills
MI

3,736

27,657

1,613

3,817

29,189

33,006

7,745

25,261

2006
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Cascade
Grand Rapids
MI

1,273

21,782

262

1,284

22,033

23,317

2,739

20,578

2007
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Northville
Plymouth
MI

1,445

26,090

985

1,525

26,995

28,520

7,472

21,048

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Rochester
Rochester
MI

2,774

38,666

1,105

2,841

39,704

42,545

10,510

32,035

1998
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Troy
Troy
MI

1,758

23,727

645

1,860

24,270

26,130

6,686

19,444

2001
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Edina
Edina
MN

3,181

24,224

2,538

3,270

26,673

29,943

7,286

22,657

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise on Providence
Charlotte
NC

1,976

19,472

2,028

1,988

21,488

23,476

5,714

17,762

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise at North Hills
Raleigh
NC

749

37,091

3,504

762

40,582

41,344

10,864

30,480

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise of East Brunswick
East Brunswick
NJ

2,784

26,173

1,760

3,047

27,670

30,717

7,885

22,832

1999
2007
35 years

153


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Sunrise of Jackson
Jackson
NJ

4,009

15,029

304

4,014

15,328

19,342

2,074

17,268

2008
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Morris Plains
Morris Plains
NJ
18,165

1,492

32,052

1,709

1,517

33,736

35,253

8,956

26,297

1997
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Old Tappan
Old Tappan
NJ
16,869

2,985

36,795

1,639

3,042

38,377

41,419

10,195

31,224

1997
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Wall
Wall Township
NJ

1,053

19,101

1,011

1,063

20,102

21,165

5,533

15,632

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Wayne
Wayne
NJ
13,400

1,288

24,990

1,597

1,324

26,551

27,875

7,190

20,685

1996
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Westfield
Westfield
NJ
17,756

5,057

23,803

1,768

5,117

25,511

30,628

7,018

23,610

1996
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Woodcliff Lake
Woodcliff Lake
NJ

3,493

30,801

1,258

3,537

32,015

35,552

8,844

26,708

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise of North Lynbrook
Lynbrook
NY

4,622

38,087

1,672

4,700

39,681

44,381

11,128

33,253

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise at Fleetwood
Mount Vernon
NY

4,381

28,434

1,978

4,400

30,393

34,793

8,353

26,440

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of New City
New City
NY

1,906

27,323

1,520

1,950

28,799

30,749

7,817

22,932

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Smithtown
Smithtown
NY

2,853

25,621

2,001

3,038

27,437

30,475

8,036

22,439

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Staten Island
Staten Island
NY

7,237

23,910

151

7,288

24,010

31,298

8,458

22,840

2006
2007
35 years
Sunrise at Parma
Cleveland
OH

695

16,641

1,085

890

17,531

18,421

4,791

13,630

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Cuyahoga Falls
Cuyahoga Falls
OH

626

10,239

1,386

724

11,527

12,251

3,176

9,075

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Aurora
Aurora
ON

1,570

36,113

(9,936
)
1,133

26,614

27,747

7,065

20,682

2002
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Burlington
Burlington
ON

1,173

24,448

371

1,190

24,802

25,992

6,465

19,527

2001
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Unionville
Markham
ON

2,322

41,140

(11,229
)
1,722

30,511

32,233

8,007

24,226

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Mississauga
Mississauga
ON

3,554

33,631

(9,614
)
2,586

24,985

27,571

6,521

21,050

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Erin Mills
Mississauga
ON

1,957

27,020

(7,618
)
1,407

19,952

21,359

5,555

15,804

2007
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Oakville
Oakville
ON

2,753

37,489

547

2,755

38,034

40,789

9,817

30,972

2002
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Richmond Hill
Richmond Hill
ON

2,155

41,254

(11,479
)
1,553

30,377

31,930

7,834

24,096

2002
2007
35 years
Thorne Mill of Steeles
Vaughan
ON

2,563

57,513

(13,988
)
1,063

45,025

46,088

10,866

35,222

2003
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Windsor
Windsor
ON

1,813

20,882

442

1,832

21,305

23,137

5,633

17,504

2001
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Abington
Abington
PA
22,819

1,838

53,660

3,883

1,980

57,401

59,381

14,930

44,451

1997
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Blue Bell
Blue Bell
PA

1,765

23,920

2,149

1,827

26,007

27,834

7,270

20,564

2006
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Exton
Exton
PA

1,123

17,765

1,500

1,187

19,201

20,388

5,312

15,076

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Haverford
Haverford
PA
7,159

941

25,872

1,738

962

27,589

28,551

7,340

21,211

1997
2007
35 years
Sunrise at Granite Run
Media
PA
11,019

1,272

31,781

2,098

1,372

33,779

35,151

8,893

26,258

1997
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Lower Makefield
Morrisville
PA

3,165

21,337

359

3,165

21,696

24,861

2,796

22,065

2008
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Westtown
West Chester
PA

1,547

22,996

1,383

1,570

24,356

25,926

7,073

18,853

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Hillcrest
Dallas
TX

2,616

27,680

562

2,626

28,232

30,858

7,639

23,219

2006
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Fort Worth
Fort Worth
TX

2,024

18,587

539

2,082

19,068

21,150

2,454

18,696

2007
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Frisco
Frisco
TX

2,523

14,547

189

2,535

14,724

17,259

1,694

15,565

2009
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Cinco Ranch
Katy
TX

2,512

21,600

452

2,550

22,014

24,564

2,782

21,782

2007
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Holladay
Holladay
UT

2,542

44,771

435

2,577

45,171

47,748

5,614

42,134

2008
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Sandy
Sandy
UT

2,576

22,987

155

2,618

23,100

25,718

6,359

19,359

2007
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Alexandria
Alexandria
VA

88

14,811

1,431

176

16,154

16,330

4,961

11,369

1998
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Richmond
Richmond
VA

1,120

17,446

1,136

1,149

18,553

19,702

5,307

14,395

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Bon Air
Richmond
VA

2,047

22,079

390

2,032

22,484

24,516

2,918

21,598

2008
2012
35 years

154


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Sunrise of Springfield
Springfield
VA
8,198

4,440

18,834

2,164

4,466

20,972

25,438

5,723

19,715

1997
2007
35 years
TOTAL FOR SUNRISE SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES
 
 
115,385

245,515

2,532,176

30,476

240,790

2,567,377

2,808,167

647,355

2,160,812

 
 
 
ATRIA SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Arbour Lake
Calgary
AB

2,512

39,188

(6,592
)
2,116

32,992

35,108

1,559

33,549

2003
2014
35 years
Canyon Meadows
Calgary
AB

1,617

30,803

(4,944
)
1,358

26,118

27,476

1,270

26,206

1995
2014
35 years
Churchill Manor
Edmonton
AB

2,865

30,482

(4,969
)
2,406

25,972

28,378

1,274

27,104

1999
2014
35 years
View at Lethbridge
Lethbridge
AB

2,503

24,770

(4,211
)
2,102

20,960

23,062

1,105

21,957

2007
2014
35 years
Victoria Park
Red Deer
AB
8,194

1,188

22,554

(3,325
)
998

19,419

20,417

1,018

19,399

1999
2014
35 years
Ironwood Estates
St. Albert
AB

3,639

22,519

(3,791
)
3,056

19,311

22,367

1,011

21,356

1998
2014
35 years
Atria Regency
Mobile
AL

950

11,897

1,036

953

12,930

13,883

2,584

11,299

1996
2011
35 years
Atria Chandler Villas
Chandler
AZ

3,650

8,450

1,121

3,715

9,506

13,221

2,602

10,619

1988
2011
35 years
Atria Sierra Pointe
Scottsdale
AZ

10,930

65,372

938

10,952

66,288

77,240

3,188

74,052

2000
2014
35 years
Atria Campana Del Rio
Tucson
AZ

5,861

37,284

1,408

5,896

38,657

44,553

7,302

37,251

1964
2011
35 years
Atria Valley Manor
Tucson
AZ

1,709

60

544

1,738

575

2,313

210

2,103

1963
2011
35 years
Atria Bell Court Gardens
Tucson
AZ

3,010

30,969

890

3,020

31,849

34,869

5,374

29,495

1964
2011
35 years
Longlake Chateau
Nanaimo
BC
8,564

1,874

22,910

(3,626
)
1,574

19,584

21,158

1,042

20,116

1990
2014
35 years
Prince George
Prince George
BC
8,431

2,066

22,761

(3,903
)
1,735

19,189

20,924

1,034

19,890

2005
2014
35 years
The Victorian
Victoria
BC

3,419

16,351

(2,957
)
2,871

13,942

16,813

782

16,031

1988
2014
35 years
Victorian at McKenzie
Victoria
BC

4,801

25,712

(4,688
)
4,031

21,794

25,825

1,124

24,701

2003
2014
35 years
Atria Burlingame
Burlingame
CA
7,152

2,494

12,373

998

2,523

13,342

15,865

2,455

13,410

1977
2011
35 years
Atria Las Posas
Camarillo
CA

4,500

28,436

689

4,508

29,117

33,625

4,834

28,791

1997
2011
35 years
Atria Carmichael Oaks
Carmichael
CA
18,684

2,118

49,694

1,264

2,134

50,942

53,076

4,617

48,459

1992
2013
35 years
Atria El Camino Gardens
Carmichael
CA

6,930

32,318

8,915

6,971

41,192

48,163

5,984

42,179

1984
2011
35 years
Atria Covina
Covina
CA

170

4,131

565

250

4,616

4,866

1,076

3,790

1977
2011
35 years
Atria Daly City
Daly City
CA
7,291

3,090

13,448

1,003

3,099

14,442

17,541

2,540

15,001

1975
2011
35 years
Atria Covell Gardens
Davis
CA
18,171

2,163

39,657

7,856

2,382

47,294

49,676

8,284

41,392

1987
2011
35 years
Atria Encinitas
Encinitas
CA

5,880

9,212

864

5,922

10,034

15,956

2,057

13,899

1984
2011
35 years
Atria Escondido
Escondido
CA

1,196

7,155

166

1,196

7,321

8,517

505

8,012

2002
2014
35 years
Atria Grass Valley
Grass Valley
CA
11,644

1,965

28,414

435

1,983

28,831

30,814

2,768

28,046

2000
2013
35 years
Atria Golden Creek
Irvine
CA

6,900

23,544

936

6,924

24,456

31,380

4,526

26,854

1985
2011
35 years
Atria Woodbridge
Irvine
CA


5

1,372

91

1,286

1,377

305

1,072

1997
2012
35 years
Atria Lafayette
Lafayette
CA
19,618

5,679

56,922

386

5,692

57,295

62,987

4,946

58,041

2007
2013
35 years
Atria Del Sol
Mission Viejo
CA

3,500

12,458

8,559

3,716

20,801

24,517

2,584

21,933

1985
2011
35 years
Atria Tamalpais Creek
Novato
CA

5,812

24,703

500

5,827

25,188

31,015

4,293

26,722

1978
2011
35 years
Atria Pacific Palisades
Pacific Palisades
CA

4,458

17,064

1,065

4,470

18,117

22,587

5,329

17,258

2001
2007
35 years
Atria Palm Desert
Palm Desert
CA

2,887

9,843

1,018

3,106

10,642

13,748

3,354

10,394

1988
2011
35 years

155


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria Hacienda
Palm Desert
CA

6,680

85,900

2,231

6,826

87,985

94,811

13,532

81,279

1989
2011
35 years
Atria Paradise
Paradise
CA
4,983

2,265

28,262

715

2,309

28,933

31,242

2,646

28,596

1999
2013
35 years
Atria Del Rey
Rancho Cucamonga
CA

3,290

17,427

4,517

3,458

21,776

25,234

4,992

20,242

1987
2011
35 years
Atria Collwood
San Diego
CA

290

10,650

751

338

11,353

11,691

2,267

9,424

1976
2011
35 years
Atria Rancho Park
San Dimas
CA

4,066

14,306

1,069

4,576

14,865

19,441

3,258

16,183

1975
2011
35 years
Atria Chateau Gardens
San Jose
CA

39

487

554

39

1,041

1,080

616

464

1977
2011
35 years
Atria Willow Glen
San Jose
CA

8,521

43,168

2,097

8,556

45,230

53,786

6,412

47,374

1976
2011
35 years
Atria Chateau San Juan
San Juan Capistrano
CA

5,110

29,436

8,027

5,305

37,268

42,573

8,173

34,400

1985
2011
35 years
Atria Hillsdale
San Mateo
CA

5,240

15,956

1,384

5,251

17,329

22,580

2,996

19,584

1986
2011
35 years
Atria Bayside Landing
Stockton
CA


467

456


923

923

581

342

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Sunnyvale
Sunnyvale
CA

6,120

30,068

4,117

6,217

34,088

40,305

5,498

34,807

1977
2011
35 years
Atria Tarzana
Tarzana
CA

960

47,547

520

968

48,059

49,027

4,021

45,006

2008
2013
35 years
Atria Vintage Hills
Temecula
CA

4,674

44,341

1,160

4,784

45,391

50,175

4,391

45,784

2000
2013
35 years
Atria Grand Oaks
Thousand Oaks
CA
22,350

5,994

50,309

444

6,044

50,703

56,747

4,759

51,988

2002
2013
35 years
Atria Hillcrest
Thousand Oaks
CA

6,020

25,635

9,492

6,612

34,535

41,147

7,045

34,102

1987
2011
35 years
Atria Montego Heights
Walnut Creek
CA

6,910

15,797

14,523

7,535

29,695

37,230

4,591

32,639

1978
2011
35 years
Atria Valley View
Walnut Creek
CA

7,139

53,914

2,343

7,171

56,225

63,396

13,463

49,933

1977
2011
35 years
Atria Applewood
Lakewood
CO

3,656

48,657

331

3,675

48,969

52,644

4,765

47,879

2008
2013
35 years
Atria Inn at Lakewood
Lakewood
CO

6,281

50,095

1,127

6,311

51,192

57,503

7,852

49,651

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Vistas in Longmont
Longmont
CO

2,807

24,877

374

2,815

25,243

28,058

3,279

24,779

2009
2012
35 years
Atria Darien
Darien
CT
19,494

653

37,587

3,991

816

41,415

42,231

6,737

35,494

1997
2011
35 years
Atria Larson Place
Hamden
CT

1,850

16,098

1,106

1,873

17,181

19,054

3,259

15,795

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Greenridge Place
Rocky Hill
CT

2,170

32,553

1,412

2,388

33,747

36,135

5,430

30,705

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Stamford
Stamford
CT
36,272

1,200

62,432

3,474

1,373

65,733

67,106

10,775

56,331

1975
2011
35 years
Atria Stratford
Stratford
CT

3,210

27,865

1,067

3,210

28,932

32,142

5,122

27,020

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Crossroads Place
Waterford
CT

2,401

36,495

7,290

2,552

43,634

46,186

6,721

39,465

2000
2011
35 years
Atria Hamilton Heights
West Hartford
CT

3,120

14,674

2,136

3,154

16,776

19,930

3,701

16,229

1904
2011
35 years
Atria Windsor Woods
Hudson
FL

1,610

32,432

1,407

1,661

33,788

35,449

6,145

29,304

1988
2011
35 years
Atria Baypoint Village
Hudson
FL
15,436

2,083

28,841

4,345

2,259

33,010

35,269

6,475

28,794

1986
2011
35 years
Atria San Pablo
Jacksonville
FL
5,596

1,620

14,920

678

1,642

15,576

17,218

2,614

14,604

1999
2011
35 years
Atria at St. Joseph's
Jupiter
FL
16,115

5,520

30,720

612

5,549

31,303

36,852

2,945

33,907

2007
2013
35 years
Atria Meridian
Lake Worth
FL


10

1,169

30

1,149

1,179

307

872

1986
2012
35 years
Atria Heritage at Lake Forest
Sanford
FL

3,589

32,586

2,618

3,844

34,949

38,793

5,553

33,240

2002
2011
35 years
Atria Evergreen Woods
Spring Hill
FL

2,370

28,371

2,859

2,518

31,082

33,600

6,251

27,349

1981
2011
35 years
Atria North Point
Alpharetta
GA
41,724

4,830

78,318

775

4,853

79,070

83,923

4,772

79,151

2007
2014
35 years
Atria Buckhead
Atlanta
GA

3,660

5,274

673

3,683

5,924

9,607

1,443

8,164

1996
2011
35 years
Atria Mableton
Austell
GA

1,911

18,879

227

1,942

19,075

21,017

1,879

19,138

2000
2013
35 years
Atria Johnson Ferry
Marietta
GA

990

6,453

363

995

6,811

7,806

1,327

6,479

1995
2011
35 years

156


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria Tucker
Tucker
GA

1,103

20,679

275

1,115

20,942

22,057

2,030

20,027

2000
2013
35 years
Atria Glen Ellyn
Glen Ellyn
IL

2,455

34,064

1,849

2,486

35,882

38,368

9,799

28,569

2000
2007
35 years
Atria Newburgh
Newburgh
IN

1,150

22,880

499

1,150

23,379

24,529

3,787

20,742

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Hearthstone East
Topeka
KS

1,150

20,544

756

1,171

21,279

22,450

3,748

18,702

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Hearthstone West
Topeka
KS

1,230

28,379

1,826

1,230

30,205

31,435

5,555

25,880

1987
2011
35 years
Atria Highland Crossing
Covington
KY

1,677

14,393

1,203

1,689

15,584

17,273

3,262

14,011

1988
2011
35 years
Atria Summit Hills
Crestview Hills
KY

1,780

15,769

698

1,789

16,458

18,247

3,020

15,227

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Elizabethtown
Elizabethtown
KY

850

12,510

486

869

12,977

13,846

2,238

11,608

1996
2011
35 years
Atria St. Matthews
Louisville
KY

939

9,274

627

948

9,892

10,840

2,408

8,432

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Stony Brook
Louisville
KY

1,860

17,561

582

1,888

18,115

20,003

3,238

16,765

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Springdale
Louisville
KY

1,410

16,702

743

1,410

17,445

18,855

3,139

15,716

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Marland Place
Andover
MA

1,831

34,592

18,612

1,984

53,051

55,035

7,581

47,454

1996
2011
35 years
Atria Longmeadow Place
Burlington
MA

5,310

58,021

1,093

5,383

59,041

64,424

8,948

55,476

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Fairhaven (Alden)
Fairhaven
MA

1,100

16,093

602

1,117

16,678

17,795

2,725

15,070

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Woodbriar Place
Falmouth
MA
22,940

4,630


32,684

6,433

30,881

37,314

3,431

33,883

2013
2011
35 years
Atria Woodbriar
Falmouth
MA

1,970

43,693

16,799

1,974

60,488

62,462

6,640

55,822

1975
2011
35 years
Atria Draper Place
Hopedale
MA

1,140

17,794

1,173

1,154

18,953

20,107

3,155

16,952

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Merrimack Place
Newburyport
MA

2,774

40,645

1,089

2,809

41,699

44,508

6,305

38,203

2000
2011
35 years
Atria Marina Place
Quincy
MA

2,590

33,899

1,207

2,606

35,090

37,696

5,753

31,943

1999
2011
35 years
Riverheights Terrace
Brandon
MB
8,823

799

27,708

(4,396
)
671

23,440

24,111

1,191

22,920

2001
2014
35 years
Amber Meadow
Winnipeg
MB

3,047

17,821

(2,996
)
2,560

15,312

17,872

901

16,971

2000
2014
35 years
The Westhaven
Winnipeg
MB

871

23,162

(3,572
)
742

19,719

20,461

1,039

19,422

1988
2014
35 years
Atria Manresa
Annapolis
MD

4,193

19,000

1,438

4,465

20,166

24,631

3,453

21,178

1920
2011
35 years
Atria Salisbury
Salisbury
MD

1,940

24,500

401

1,949

24,892

26,841

3,918

22,923

1995
2011
35 years
Atria Kennebunk
Kennebunk
ME

1,090

23,496

709

1,104

24,191

25,295

4,067

21,228

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Ann Arbor
Ann Arbor
MI

1,703

15,857

1,720

1,710

17,570

19,280

4,995

14,285

2001
2007
35 years
Atria Kinghaven
Riverview
MI
13,545

1,440

26,260

1,255

1,495

27,460

28,955

4,901

24,054

1987
2011
35 years
Atria Shorehaven
Sterling Heights
MI


8

996

23

981

1,004

204

800

1989
2012
35 years
Ste. Anne’s Court
Fredericton
NB

1,221

29,626

(4,781
)
1,025

25,041

26,066

1,262

24,804

2002
2014
35 years
Chateau De Champlain
St. John
NB
8,287

796

24,577

(3,797
)
674

20,902

21,576

1,094

20,482

2002
2014
35 years
Atria Merrywood
Charlotte
NC

1,678

36,892

2,051

1,705

38,916

40,621

6,946

33,675

1991
2011
35 years
Atria Southpoint
Durham
NC
16,609

2,130

25,920

446

2,130

26,366

28,496

2,608

25,888

2009
2013
35 years
Atria Oakridge
Raleigh
NC
15,406

1,482

28,838

404

1,514

29,210

30,724

2,906

27,818

2009
2013
35 years
Atria Cranford
Cranford
NJ
26,052

8,260

61,411

3,011

8,344

64,338

72,682

10,747

61,935

1993
2011
35 years
Atria Tinton Falls
Tinton Falls
NJ

6,580

13,258

1,037

6,593

14,282

20,875

3,073

17,802

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Vista del Rio
Albuquerque
NM


36

1,008

57

987

1,044

227

817

1997
2012
35 years
Atria Sunlake
Las Vegas
NV

7

732

745

7

1,477

1,484

883

601

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Sutton
Las Vegas
NV


863

894

39

1,718

1,757

1,100

657

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Seville
Las Vegas
NV


796

811

11

1,596

1,607

975

632

1999
2011
35 years

157


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria Summit Ridge
Reno
NV

4

407

336

4

743

747

482

265

1997
2011
35 years
Atria Shaker
Albany
NY

1,520

29,667

797

1,626

30,358

31,984

5,018

26,966

1997
2011
35 years
Atria Crossgate
Albany
NY

1,080

20,599

816

1,080

21,415

22,495

3,642

18,853

1980
2011
35 years
Atria Woodlands
Ardsley
NY
46,448

7,660

65,581

1,657

7,682

67,216

74,898

10,727

64,171

2005
2011
35 years
Atria Bay Shore
Bay Shore
NY
15,275

4,440

31,983

1,256

4,448

33,231

37,679

5,477

32,202

1900
2011
35 years
Atria Briarcliff Manor
Briarcliff Manor
NY

6,560

33,885

1,632

6,613

35,464

42,077

6,012

36,065

1997
2011
35 years
Atria Riverdale
Bronx
NY

1,020

24,149

12,988

1,057

37,100

38,157

5,277

32,880

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Delmar Place
Delmar
NY

1,201

24,850

436

1,219

25,268

26,487

1,789

24,698

2004
2013
35 years
Atria East Northport
East Northport
NY

9,960

34,467

18,029

10,003

52,453

62,456

6,082

56,374

1996
2011
35 years
Atria Glen Cove
Glen Cove
NY

2,035

25,190

910

2,049

26,086

28,135

8,278

19,857

1997
2011
35 years
Atria Great Neck
Great Neck
NY

3,390

54,051

1,386

3,390

55,437

58,827

8,347

50,480

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Cutter Mill
Great Neck
NY
34,301

2,750

47,919

1,668

2,756

49,581

52,337

7,710

44,627

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Huntington
Huntington Station
NY

8,190

1,169

1,609

8,232

2,736

10,968

1,375

9,593

1987
2011
35 years
Atria Hertlin House
Lake Ronkonkoma
NY

7,886

16,391

1,166

7,886

17,557

25,443

2,089

23,354

2002
2012
35 years
Atria Lynbrook
Lynbrook
NY

3,145

5,489

718

3,147

6,205

9,352

1,713

7,639

1996
2011
35 years
Atria Tanglewood
Lynbrook
NY
25,130

4,120

37,348

672

4,142

37,998

42,140

5,915

36,225

2005
2011
35 years
Atria 86th Street
New York
NY

80

73,685

4,713

167

78,311

78,478

12,777

65,701

1998
2011
35 years
Atria on the Hudson
Ossining
NY

8,123

63,089

2,622

8,157

65,677

73,834

11,237

62,597

1972
2011
35 years
Atria Penfield
Penfield
NY

620

22,036

626

628

22,654

23,282

3,822

19,460

1972
2011
35 years
Atria Plainview
Plainview
NY
13,099

2,480

16,060

929

2,630

16,839

19,469

3,089

16,380

2000
2011
35 years
Atria Rye Brook
Port Chester
NY
43,053

9,660

74,936

984

9,716

75,864

85,580

11,865

73,715

2004
2011
35 years
Atria Kew Gardens
Queens
NY

3,051

66,013

7,437

3,068

73,433

76,501

10,391

66,110

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Forest Hills
Queens
NY

2,050

16,680

635

2,050

17,315

19,365

3,058

16,307

2001
2011
35 years
Atria Greece
Rochester
NY

410

14,967

848

636

15,589

16,225

2,733

13,492

1970
2011
35 years
Atria on Roslyn Harbor
Roslyn
NY
65,000

12,909

72,720

1,333

12,968

73,994

86,962

11,390

75,572

2006
2011
35 years
Atria Guilderland
Slingerlands
NY

1,170

22,414

339

1,171

22,752

23,923

3,723

20,200

1950
2011
35 years
Atria South Setauket
South Setauket
NY

8,450

14,534

1,145

8,786

15,343

24,129

3,897

20,232

1967
2011
35 years
Atria Northgate Park
Cincinnati
OH



540

23

517

540

177

363

1985
2012
35 years
The Court at Brooklin
Brooklin
ON

2,515

35,602

(5,917
)
2,112

30,088

32,200

1,448

30,752

2004
2014
35 years
Burlington Gardens
Burlington
ON

7,560

50,744

(9,122
)
6,349

42,833

49,182

1,980

47,202

2008
2014
35 years
The Court at Rushdale
Hamilton
ON
13,076

1,799

34,633

(5,334
)
1,511

29,587

31,098

1,408

29,690

2004
2014
35 years
Kingsdale Chateau
Kingston
ON
13,701

2,221

36,272

(5,985
)
1,865

30,643

32,508

1,486

31,022

2000
2014
35 years
Crystal View Lodge
Nepean
ON

1,587

37,243

(5,659
)
1,457

31,714

33,171

1,532

31,639

2000
2014
35 years
The Court at Barrhaven
Nepean
ON

1,778

33,922

(4,861
)
1,493

29,346

30,839

1,395

29,444

2004
2014
35 years
Stamford Estates
Niagara Falls
ON
10,640

1,414

29,439

(4,721
)
1,188

24,944

26,132

1,245

24,887

2005
2014
35 years
Sherbrooke Heights
Peterborough
ON
13,110

2,485

33,747

(5,217
)
2,090

28,925

31,015

1,406

29,609

2001
2014
35 years
Anchor Pointe
St. Catharines
ON
12,379

8,214

24,056

(4,980
)
6,898

20,392

27,290

1,136

26,154

2000
2014
35 years
The Court at Pringle Creek
Whitby
ON

2,965

39,206

(6,137
)
2,490

33,544

36,034

1,610

34,424

2002
2014
35 years

158


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria Bethlehem
Bethlehem
PA

2,479

22,870

622

2,484

23,487

25,971

4,201

21,770

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Center City
Philadelphia
PA
22,662

3,460

18,291

1,770

3,460

20,061

23,521

3,844

19,677

1964
2011
35 years
Atria Woodbridge Place
Phoenixville
PA

1,510

19,130

593

1,510

19,723

21,233

3,456

17,777

1996
2011
35 years
Atria South Hills
Pittsburgh
PA

880

10,884

484

895

11,353

12,248

2,333

9,915

1998
2011
35 years
La Residence Steger
Saint-Laurent
QC
5,233

1,995

10,926

(1,717
)
1,676

9,528

11,204

631

10,573

1999
2014
35 years
Atria Bay Spring Village
Barrington
RI

2,000

33,400

2,120

2,075

35,445

37,520

6,464

31,056

2000
2011
35 years
Atria Harborhill Place
East Greenwich
RI

2,089

21,702

963

2,115

22,639

24,754

3,814

20,940

1835
2011
35 years
Atria Lincoln Place
Lincoln
RI

1,440

12,686

664

1,470

13,320

14,790

2,639

12,151

2000
2011
35 years
Atria Aquidneck Place
Portsmouth
RI

2,810

31,623

465

2,810

32,088

34,898

4,919

29,979

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Forest Lake
Columbia
SC

670

13,946

639

680

14,575

15,255

2,419

12,836

1999
2011
35 years
Primrose Chateau
Saskatoon
SK
13,046

2,611

32,729

(5,397
)
2,193

27,750

29,943

1,355

28,588

1996
2014
35 years
Mulberry Estates
Moose Jaw
SK
13,099

2,173

31,791

(5,177
)
1,824

26,963

28,787

1,335

27,452

2003
2014
35 years
Queen Victoria
Regina
SK

3,018

34,109

(5,545
)
2,534

29,048

31,582

1,389

30,193

2000
2014
35 years
Atria Weston Place
Knoxville
TN
9,532

793

7,961

952

967

8,739

9,706

1,783

7,923

1993
2011
35 years
Atria Village at Arboretum
Austin
TX

8,280

61,764

445

8,295

62,194

70,489

6,903

63,586

2009
2012
35 years
Atria Collier Park
Beaumont
TX



794

2

792

794

273

521

1996
2012
35 years
Atria Carrollton
Carrollton
TX
6,901

360

20,465

946

364

21,407

21,771

3,662

18,109

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Grapevine
Grapevine
TX

2,070

23,104

448

2,070

23,552

25,622

3,889

21,733

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Westchase
Houston
TX

2,318

22,278

583

2,322

22,857

25,179

3,900

21,279

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Kingwood
Kingwood
TX

1,170

4,518

433

1,189

4,932

6,121

1,153

4,968

1998
2011
35 years
Atria at Hometown
North Richland Hills
TX

1,932

30,382

594

1,958

30,950

32,908

3,143

29,765

2007
2013
35 years
Atria Canyon Creek
Plano
TX

3,110

45,999

724

3,138

46,695

49,833

4,634

45,199

2009
2013
35 years
Atria Richardson
Richardson
TX

1,590

23,662

652

1,595

24,309

25,904

4,008

21,896

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Cypresswood
Spring
TX

880

9,192

728

887

9,913

10,800

1,786

9,014

1996
2011
35 years
Atria Sugar Land
Sugar Land
TX

970

17,542

677

978

18,211

19,189

3,037

16,152

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Copeland
Tyler
TX

1,879

17,901

636

1,881

18,535

20,416

3,251

17,165

1997
2011
35 years
Atria Willow Park
Tyler
TX

920

31,271

707

928

31,970

32,898

5,619

27,279

1985
2011
35 years
Atria Virginia Beach (Hilltop)
Virginia Beach
VA

1,749

33,004

532

1,749

33,536

35,285

5,673

29,612

1998
2011
35 years
Amberwood
Port Richey
FL

1,320



1,320


1,320


1,320

N/A
2011
N/A
Other Projects
 
 


4,307



4,307

4,307


4,307

CIP
CIP
35 years
TOTAL FOR ATRIA SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES
 
 
757,066

518,349

4,694,099

182,772

516,626

4,878,594

5,395,220

687,032

4,708,188

 
 
 
OTHER SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
Elmcroft of Grayson Valley
Birmingham
AL

1,040

19,145

474

1,046

19,613

20,659

2,911

17,748

2000
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Byrd Springs
Hunstville
AL

1,720

11,270

440

1,723

11,707

13,430

1,914

11,516

1999
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Heritage Woods
Mobile
AL

1,020

10,241

458

1,020

10,699

11,719

1,769

9,950

2000
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Halcyon
Montgomery
AL

220

5,476


220

5,476

5,696

1,434

4,262

1999
2006
35 years

159


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Rosewood Manor (AL)
Scottsboro
AL

680

4,038


680

4,038

4,718

603

4,115

1998
2011
35 years
West Shores
Hot Springs
AR

1,326

10,904


1,326

10,904

12,230

3,315

8,915

1988
2005
35 years
Elmcroft of Maumelle
Maumelle
AR

1,252

7,601


1,252

7,601

8,853

1,991

6,862

1997
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Mountain Home
Mountain Home
AR

204

8,971


204

8,971

9,175

2,350

6,825

1997
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Sherwood
Sherwood
AR

1,320

5,693


1,320

5,693

7,013

1,491

5,522

1997
2006
35 years
Chandler Memory Care Community
Chandler
AZ

2,910


9,066

3,094

8,882

11,976

1,303

10,673

2011
2011
35 years
Cottonwood Village
Cottonwood
AZ

1,200

15,124


1,200

15,124

16,324

4,571

11,753

1986
2005
35 years
Silver Creek Inn Memory Care Community
Gilbert
AZ

890

5,918


890

5,918

6,808

745

6,063

2012
2012
35 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Green Valley
Green Valley
AZ

1,227

13,977


1,227

13,977

15,204

507

14,697

1998
2014
35 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Lake Havasu City
Lake Havasu
AZ

594

14,792


594

14,792

15,386

533

14,853

1999
2014
35 years
Lakeview Terrace
Lake Havasu City
AZ

706

7,810


706

7,810

8,516

264

8,252

2009
2015
35 years


160


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Arbor Rose
Mesa
AZ

1,100

11,880

2,434

1,100

14,314

15,414

2,855

12,559

1999
2011
35 years
The Stratford
Phoenix
AZ

1,931

33,576


1,931

33,576

35,507

1,213

34,294

2001
2014
35 years
Amber Creek Inn Memory Care
Scottsdale
AZ

2,310

6,322

676

2,185

7,123

9,308

51

9,257

1986
2011
35 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Sierra Vista
Sierra Vista
AZ

295

13,224


295

13,224

13,519

475

13,044

1999
2014
35 years
Elmcroft of Tempe
Tempe
AZ

1,090

12,942

834

1,090

13,776

14,866

2,158

12,708

1999
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of River Centre
Tucson
AZ

1,940

5,195

405

1,940

5,600

7,540

1,075

6,465

1999
2011
35 years
Sierra Ridge Memory Care
Auburn
CA

681

6,071


681

6,071

6,752

247

6,505

2011
2014
35 years
Careage Banning
Banning
CA

2,970

16,037


2,970

16,037

19,007

2,549

16,458

2004
2011
35 years
Las Villas Del Carlsbad
Carlsbad
CA

1,760

30,469


1,760

30,469

32,229

7,980

24,249

1987
2006
35 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Chico
Chico
CA

1,069

14,929


1,069

14,929

15,998

540

15,458

1998
2014
35 years
Villa Bonita
Chula Vista
CA

1,610

9,169


1,610

9,169

10,779

1,547

9,232

1989
2011
35 years
The Meadows Senior Living
Elk Grove
CA

1,308

19,667


1,308

19,667

20,975

787

20,188

2003
2014
35 years
Las Villas Del Norte
Escondido
CA

2,791

32,632


2,791

32,632

35,423

8,546

26,877

1986
2006
35 years
Alder Bay Assisted Living
Eureka
CA

1,170

5,228

(70
)
1,170

5,158

6,328

862

5,466

1997
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of La Mesa
La Mesa
CA

2,431

6,101


2,431

6,101

8,532

1,598

6,934

1997
2006
35 years
Grossmont Gardens
La Mesa
CA

9,104

59,349


9,104

59,349

68,453

15,544

52,909

1964
2006
35 years
Palms, The
La Mirada
CA

2,700

43,919


2,700

43,919

46,619

3,305

43,314

1990
2013
35 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Lancaster
Lancaster
CA

718

10,459


718

10,459

11,177

378

10,799

1999
2014
35 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Marysville
Marysville
CA

741

7,467


741

7,467

8,208

271

7,937

1999
2014
35 years
Mountview Retirement Residence
Montrose
CA

1,089

15,449


1,089

15,449

16,538

4,046

12,492

1974
2006
35 years
Redwood Retirement
Napa
CA

2,798

12,639


2,798

12,639

15,437

972

14,465

1986
2013
35 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Oroville
Oroville
CA

638

8,079


638

8,079

8,717

293

8,424

1999
2014
35 years
Valencia Commons
Rancho Cucamonga
CA

1,439

36,363


1,439

36,363

37,802

2,728

35,074

2002
2013
35 years
Mission Hills
Rancho Mirage
CA

6,800

3,637


6,800

3,637

10,437

969

9,468

1999
2011
35 years
Shasta Estates
Redding
CA

1,180

23,463


1,180

23,463

24,643

1,763

22,880

2009
2013
35 years
The Vistas
Redding
CA

1,290

22,033


1,290

22,033

23,323

3,197

20,126

2007
2011
35 years
Casa de Santa Fe
Rocklin
CA
20,024

4,427

52,064


4,427

52,064

56,491

1,613

54,878

2001
2015
35 years
Elmcroft of Point Loma
San Diego
CA

2,117

6,865


2,117

6,865

8,982

1,798

7,184

1999
2006
35 years
Regency of Evergreen Valley
San Jose
CA

2,700

7,994


2,700

7,994

10,694

1,585

9,109

1998
2011
35 years
Villa del Obispo
San Juan Capistrano
CA

2,660

9,560

54

2,660

9,614

12,274

1,531

10,743

1985
2011
35 years
Villa Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara
CA

1,219

12,426


1,219

12,426

13,645

3,769

9,876

1977
2005
35 years
Summerhill Villa
Santa Clarita
CA

3,880

38,366


3,880

38,366

42,246

1,210

41,036

2001
2015
35 years
Skyline Place Senior Living
Sonora
CA

1,815

28,472


1,815

28,472

30,287

1,145

29,142

1996
2014
35 years

161


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Oak Terrace Memory Care
Soulsbyville
CA

1,146

5,275


1,146

5,275

6,421

219

6,202

1999
2014
35 years
Eagle Lake Village
Susanville
CA

1,165

6,719


1,165

6,719

7,884

772

7,112

2006
2012
35 years
Bonaventure, The
Ventura
CA

5,294

32,747


5,294

32,747

38,041

2,498

35,543

2005
2013
35 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Visalia
Visalia
CA

1,300

8,378


1,300

8,378

9,678

307

9,371

1998
2014
35 years
Vista Village
Vista
CA

1,630

5,640

61

1,630

5,701

7,331

1,051

6,280

1980
2011
35 years
Rancho Vista
Vista
CA

6,730

21,828


6,730

21,828

28,558

5,717

22,841

1982
2006
35 years
Westminster Terrace
Westminster
CA

1,700

11,514

18

1,700

11,532

13,232

1,699

11,533

2001
2011
35 years
Highland Trail
Broomfield
CO

2,511

26,431


2,511

26,431

28,942

1,998

26,944

2009
2013
35 years
Caley Ridge
Englewood
CO

1,157

13,133


1,157

13,133

14,290

1,508

12,782

1999
2012
35 years
Garden Square at Westlake
Greeley
CO

630

8,211


630

8,211

8,841

1,258

7,583

1998
2011
35 years
Garden Square of Greeley
Greeley
CO

330

2,735


330

2,735

3,065

436

2,629

1995
2011
35 years
Lakewood Estates
Lakewood
CO

1,306

21,137


1,306

21,137

22,443

1,591

20,852

1988
2013
35 years
Sugar Valley Estates
Loveland
CO

1,255

21,837


1,255

21,837

23,092

1,643

21,449

2009
2013
35 years
Devonshire Acres
Sterling
CO

950

13,569

(2,989
)
950

10,580

11,530

1,580

9,950

1979
2011
35 years
Gardenside Terrace
Branford
CT

7,000

31,518


7,000

31,518

38,518

4,578

33,940

1999
2011
35 years
Hearth at Tuxis Pond
Madison
CT

1,610

44,322


1,610

44,322

45,932

6,124

39,808

2002
2011
35 years
White Oaks
Manchester
CT

2,584

34,507


2,584

34,507

37,091

2,602

34,489

2007
2013
35 years
Hampton Manor Belleview
Belleview
FL

390

8,337


390

8,337

8,727

1,272

7,455

1988
2011
35 years
Sabal House
Cantonment
FL

430

5,902


430

5,902

6,332

876

5,456

1999
2011
35 years
Bristol Park of Coral Springs
Coral Springs
FL

3,280

11,877


3,280

11,877

15,157

1,871

13,286

1999
2011
35 years
Stanley House
Defuniak Springs
FL

410

5,659


410

5,659

6,069

841

5,228

1999
2011
35 years
The Peninsula
Hollywood
FL

3,660

9,122


3,660

9,122

12,782

1,663

11,119

1972
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Timberlin Parc
Jacksonville
FL

455

5,905


455

5,905

6,360

1,547

4,813

1998
2006
35 years
Forsyth House
Milton
FL

610

6,503


610

6,503

7,113

954

6,159

1999
2011
35 years
Lexington Park - Lake Lady, FL
Lady Lake
FL

3,752

26,265


3,752

26,265

30,017

827

29,190

2010
2015
35 years
Princeton Village of Largo
Largo
FL

1,718

10,438


1,718

10,438

12,156

413

11,743

1992
2015
35 years
Barrington Terrace of Fort Myers
Fort Myers
FL

2,105

18,190


2,105

18,190

20,295

650

19,645

2001
2015
35 years
Barrington Terrace of Naples
Naples
FL

2,596

18,716


2,596

18,716

21,312

684

20,628

2004
2015
35 years
The Carlisle Naples
Naples
FL

8,406

78,091


8,406

78,091

86,497

10,975

75,522

1998
2011
35 years
Naples ALZ Development
Naples
FL

2,983



2,983


2,983


2,983

CIP
CIP
CIP
Hampton Manor at 24th Road
Ocala
FL

690

8,767


690

8,767

9,457

1,288

8,169

1996
2011
35 years
Hampton Manor at Deerwood
Ocala
FL

790

5,605

307

790

5,912

6,702

922

5,780

2005
2011
35 years
Las Palmas
Palm Coast
FL

984

30,009


984

30,009

30,993

2,250

28,743

2009
2013
35 years
Princeton Village of Palm Coast
Palm Coast
FL

1,958

24,525


1,958

24,525

26,483

808

25,675

2007
2015
35 years
Outlook Pointe at Pensacola
Pensacola
FL

2,230

2,362

143

2,230

2,505

4,735

580

4,155

1999
2011
35 years
Magnolia House
Quincy
FL

400

5,190


400

5,190

5,590

785

4,805

1999
2011
35 years

162


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Outlook Pointe at Tallahassee
Tallahassee
FL

2,430

17,745

159

2,430

17,904

20,334

2,742

17,592

1999
2011
35 years
Magnolia Place
Tallahassee
FL

640

8,013


640

8,013

8,653

1,153

7,500

1999
2011
35 years
Bristol Park of Tamarac
Tamarac
FL

3,920

14,130


3,920

14,130

18,050

2,153

15,897

2000
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Carrolwood
Tampa
FL

5,410

20,944

601

5,410

21,545

26,955

3,274

23,681

2001
2011
35 years
Arbor Terrace of Athens
Athens
GA

1,767

16,442


1,767

16,442

18,209

521

17,688

1998
2015
35 years
Arbor Terrace at Cascade
Atlanta
GA

3,052

9,040


3,052

9,040

12,092

422

11,670

1999
2015
35 years
Augusta Gardens
Augusta
GA

530

10,262

32

530

10,294

10,824

1,544

9,280

1997
2011
35 years
Benton House of Covington GA
Covington
GA
7,871

1,297

11,397


1,297

11,397

12,694

383

12,311

2009
2015
35 years
Arbor Terrace of Decatur
Decatur
GA
10,664

3,102

19,599


3,102

19,599

22,701

618

22,083

1990
2015
35 years
Benton House of Douglasville GA
Douglasville
GA

1,697

15,542


1,697

15,542

17,239

521

16,718

2010
2015
35 years
Elmcroft of Martinez
Martinez
GA

408

6,764


408

6,764

7,172

1,643

5,529

1997
2007
35 years
Benton House of Newnan GA
Newnan
GA

1,474

17,487


1,474

17,487

18,961

565

18,396

2010
2015
35 years
Elmcroft of Roswell
Roswell
GA

1,867

15,835


1,867

15,835

17,702

531

17,171

1997
2014
35 years
Benton Village of Stockbridge GA
Stockbridge
GA

2,221

21,989


2,221

21,989

24,210

726

23,484

2008
2015
35 years
Benton House of Sugar Hill GA
Sugar Hill
GA

2,173

14,937


2,173

14,937

17,110

520

16,590

2010
2015
35 years
Villas of St. James - Breese, IL
Breese
IL

671

6,849


671

6,849

7,520

268

7,252

2009
2015
35 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Chatham, IL
Chatham
IL

1,185

8,910


1,185

8,910

10,095

358

9,737

2012
2015
35 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Effingham, IL
Effingham
IL

508

6,624


508

6,624

7,132

252

6,880

2011
2015
35 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Herrin, IL
Herrin
IL

2,175

9,605


2,175

9,605

11,780

445

11,335

2012
2015
35 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Marshall, IL
Marshall
IL

1,461

4,881


1,461

4,881

6,342

263

6,079

2012
2015
35 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Newton, IL
Newton
IL

458

4,590


458

4,590

5,048

194

4,854

2011
2015
35 years
Wyndcrest Assisted Living
Rochester
IL

570

6,536


570

6,536

7,106

241

6,865

2005
2015
35 years
Villas of Holly Brook, Shelbyville, IL
Shelbyville
IL

2,292

3,351


2,292

3,351

5,643

289

5,354

2011
2015
35 years
Georgetowne Place
Fort Wayne
IN

1,315

18,185


1,315

18,185

19,500

5,371

14,129

1987
2005
35 years
The Harrison
Indianapolis
IN

1,200

5,740


1,200

5,740

6,940

1,823

5,117

1985
2005
35 years
Elmcroft of Muncie
Muncie
IN

244

11,218


244

11,218

11,462

2,724

8,738

1998
2007
35 years
Wood Ridge
South Bend
IN

590

4,850

(35
)
590

4,815

5,405

768

4,637

1990
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Florence
Florence
KY

1,535

21,826


1,535

21,826

23,361

727

22,634

2010
2014
35 years
Hartland Hills
Lexington
KY

1,468

23,929


1,468

23,929

25,397

1,801

23,596

2001
2013
35 years
Elmcroft of Mount Washington
Mount Washington
KY

758

12,048


758

12,048

12,806

401

12,405

2005
2014
35 years
Heritage Woods
Agawam
MA

1,249

4,625


1,249

4,625

5,874

2,128

3,746

1997
2004
30 years
Devonshire Estates
Lenox
MA

1,832

31,124


1,832

31,124

32,956

2,341

30,615

1998
2013
35 years

163


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Outlook Pointe at Hagerstown
Hagerstown
MD

2,010

1,293

100

2,010

1,393

3,403

407

2,996

1999
2011
35 years
Clover Healthcare
Auburn
ME

1,400

26,895

732

1,400

27,627

29,027

4,164

24,863

1982
2011
35 years
Gorham House
Gorham
ME

1,360

33,147

1,472

1,527

34,452

35,979

4,750

31,229

1990
2011
35 years
Kittery Estates
Kittery
ME

1,531

30,811


1,531

30,811

32,342

2,315

30,027

2009
2013
35 years
Woods at Canco
Portland
ME

1,441

45,578


1,441

45,578

47,019

3,416

43,603

2000
2013
35 years
Sentry Hill
York Harbor
ME

3,490

19,869


3,490

19,869

23,359

2,870

20,489

2000
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Downriver
Brownstown Charter Township
MI

320

32,652

415

371

33,016

33,387

4,654

28,733

2000
2011
35 years
Independence Village of East Lansing
East Lansing
MI

1,956

18,122


1,956

18,122

20,078

1,950

18,128

1989
2012
35 years
Elmcroft of Kentwood
Kentwood
MI

510

13,976

499

510

14,475

14,985

2,357

12,628

2001
2011
35 years
Primrose Austin
Austin
MN

2,540

11,707


2,540

11,707

14,247

1,651

12,596

2002
2011
35 years
Primrose Duluth
Duluth
MN

6,190

8,296

21

6,190

8,317

14,507

1,344

13,163

2003
2011
35 years
Primrose Mankato
Mankato
MN

1,860

8,920

17

1,860

8,937

10,797

1,376

9,421

1999
2011
35 years
Rose Arbor
Maple Grove
MN

1,140

12,421


1,140

12,421

13,561

4,868

8,693

2000
2006
35 years
Wildflower Lodge
Maple Grove
MN

504

5,035


504

5,035

5,539

1,978

3,561

1981
2006
35 years
Lodge at White Bear
White Bear Lake
MN

732

24,999


732

24,999

25,731

1,873

23,858

2002
2013
35 years
Assisted Living at the Meadowlands - O'Fallon, MO
O'Fallon
MO

2,326

14,158


2,326

14,158

16,484

553

15,931

1999
2015
35 years
Canyon Creek Inn Memory Care
Billings
MT

420

11,217

7

420

11,224

11,644

1,533

10,111

2011
2011
35 years
Springs at Missoula
Missoula
MT
16,009

1,975

34,390


1,975

34,390

36,365

3,722

32,643

2004
2012
35 years
Carillon ALF of Asheboro
Asheboro
NC

680

15,370


680

15,370

16,050

2,202

13,848

1998
2011
35 years
Arbor Terrace of Asheville
Asheville
NC
9,234

1,365

15,679


1,365

15,679

17,044

518

16,526

1998
2015
35 years
Elmcroft of Little Avenue
Charlotte
NC

250

5,077


250

5,077

5,327

1,330

3,997

1997
2006
35 years
Carillon ALF of Cramer Mountain
Cramerton
NC

530

18,225


530

18,225

18,755

2,635

16,120

1999
2011
35 years
Carillon ALF of Harrisburg
Harrisburg
NC

1,660

15,130


1,660

15,130

16,790

2,175

14,615

1997
2011
35 years
Carillon ALF of Hendersonville
Hendersonville
NC

2,210

7,372


2,210

7,372

9,582

1,205

8,377

2005
2011
35 years
Carillon ALF of Hillsborough
Hillsborough
NC

1,450

19,754


1,450

19,754

21,204

2,792

18,412

2005
2011
35 years
Willow Grove
Matthews
NC

763

27,544


763

27,544

28,307

2,063

26,244

2009
2013
35 years
Carillon ALF of Newton
Newton
NC

540

14,935


540

14,935

15,475

2,141

13,334

2000
2011
35 years
Independence Village of Olde Raleigh
Raleigh
NC

1,989

18,648


1,989

18,648

20,637

2,050

18,587

1991
2012
35 years
Elmcroft of Northridge
Raleigh
NC

184

3,592


184

3,592

3,776

941

2,835

1984
2006
35 years
Carillon ALF of Salisbury
Salisbury
NC

1,580

25,026


1,580

25,026

26,606

3,509

23,097

1999
2011
35 years
Carillon ALF of Shelby
Shelby
NC

660

15,471


660

15,471

16,131

2,224

13,907

2000
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Southern Pines
Southern Pines
NC

1,196

10,766


1,196

10,766

11,962

1,769

10,193

1998
2010
35 years
Carillon ALF of Southport
Southport
NC

1,330

10,356


1,330

10,356

11,686

1,589

10,097

2005
2011
35 years

164


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Primrose Bismarck
Bismarck
ND

1,210

9,768

20

1,210

9,788

10,998

1,425

9,573

1994
2011
35 years
Wellington ALF - Minot ND
Minot
ND

3,241

9,509


3,241

9,509

12,750

459

12,291

2005
2015
35 years
Crown Pointe
Omaha
NE

1,316

11,950


1,316

11,950

13,266

3,647

9,619

1985
2005
35 years
Birch Heights
Derry
NH

1,413

30,267


1,413

30,267

31,680

2,273

29,407

2009
2013
35 years
Bear Canyon Estates
Albuquerque
NM

1,879

36,223


1,879

36,223

38,102

2,722

35,380

1997
2013
35 years
The Woodmark at Uptown
Albuquerque
NM

2,439

33,276


2,439

33,276

35,715

1,070

34,645

2000
2015
35 years
Elmcroft of Quintessence
Albuquerque
NM

1,150

26,527

406

1,165

26,918

28,083

3,818

24,265

1998
2011
35 years
The Woodmark at Sun City
Sun City
NM

964

35,093


964

35,093

36,057

1,046

35,011

2000
2015
35 years
The Amberleigh
Buffalo
NY

3,498

19,097

588

3,498

19,685

23,183

6,000

17,183

1988
2005
35 years
Castle Gardens
Vestal
NY

1,830

20,312

2,230

1,885

22,487

24,372

3,869

20,503

1994
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Lima
Lima
OH

490

3,368


490

3,368

3,858

882

2,976

1998
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Ontario
Mansfield
OH

523

7,968


523

7,968

8,491

2,087

6,404

1998
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Medina
Medina
OH

661

9,788


661

9,788

10,449

2,564

7,885

1999
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Washington Township
Miamisburg
OH

1,235

12,611


1,235

12,611

13,846

3,303

10,543

1998
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Sagamore Hills
Northfield
OH

980

12,604


980

12,604

13,584

3,301

10,283

2000
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Lorain
Vermilion
OH

500

15,461

499

557

15,903

16,460

2,489

13,971

2000
2011
35 years
Gardens at Westlake - Westlake OH
Westlake
OH

2,401

20,640


2,401

20,640

23,041

730

22,311

1987
2015
35 years
Elmcroft of Xenia
Xenia
OH

653

2,801


653

2,801

3,454

734

2,720

1999
2006
35 years
Arbor House of Mustang
Mustang
OK

372

3,587


372

3,587

3,959

360

3,599

1999
2012
35 years
Arbor House of Norman
Norman
OK

444

7,525


444

7,525

7,969

751

7,218

2000
2012
35 years
Arbor House Reminisce Center
Norman
OK

438

3,028


438

3,028

3,466

306

3,160

2004
2012
35 years
Arbor House of Midwest City
Oklahoma City
OK

544

9,133


544

9,133

9,677

911

8,766

2004
2012
35 years
Mansion at Waterford
Oklahoma City
OK

2,077

14,184


2,077

14,184

16,261

1,629

14,632

1999
2012
35 years
Meadowbrook Place
Baker City
OR

1,430

5,311


1,430

5,311

6,741

218

6,523

1965
2014
35 years
Edgewood Downs
Beaverton
OR

2,356

15,476


2,356

15,476

17,832

1,179

16,653

1978
2013
35 years
Princeton Village
Clackamas
OR
2,918

1,126

10,283


1,126

10,283

11,409

354

11,055

1999
2015
35 years
Bayside Terrace
Coos Bay
OR

498

2,795


498

2,795

3,293

152

3,141

2006
2015
35 years
Ocean Ridge
Coos Bay
OR

2,681

10,941


2,681

10,941

13,622

529

13,093

2006
2015
35 years
Avamere at Hillsboro
Hillsboro
OR

4,400

8,353

1,065

4,400

9,418

13,818

1,550

12,268

2000
2011
35 years
The Springs at Tanasbourne
Hillsboro
OR
34,689

4,689

55,035


4,689

55,035

59,724

5,599

54,125

2009
2013
35 years
Keizer River ALZ Facility
Keizer
OR

922

6,460

60

1,135

6,307

7,442

290

7,152

2012
2014
35 years
Pelican Pointe
Klamath Falls
OR
12,050

943

26,237


943

26,237

27,180

836

26,344

2011
2015
35 years
The Stafford
Lake Oswego
OR

1,800

16,122


1,800

16,122

17,922

2,476

15,446

2008
2011
35 years
The Springs at Clackamas Woods (ILF)
Milwaukie
OR
10,557

1,264

22,429


1,264

22,429

23,693

2,428

21,265

1999
2012
35 years
Clackamas Woods Assisted Living
Milwaukie
OR
5,648

681

12,077


681

12,077

12,758

1,307

11,451

1999
2012
35 years
Pheasant Pointe
Molalla
OR

904

7,433


904

7,433

8,337

276

8,061

1998
2015
35 years

165


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Avamere at Newberg
Newberg
OR

1,320

4,664

383

1,320

5,047

6,367

889

5,478

1999
2011
35 years
Avamere Living at Berry Park
Oregon City
OR

1,910

4,249

2,158

1,910

6,407

8,317

1,122

7,195

1972
2011
35 years
McLoughlin Place Senior Living
Oregon City
OR

2,418

26,819


2,418

26,819

29,237

1,085

28,152

1997
2014
35 years
Avamere at Bethany
Portland
OR

3,150

16,740


3,150

16,740

19,890

2,537

17,353

2002
2011
35 years
Cedar Village
Salem
OR

868

12,652


868

12,652

13,520

418

13,102

1999
2015
35 years
Redwood Heights
Salem
OR

1,513

16,774


1,513

16,774

18,287

555

17,732

1999
2015
35 years
Avamere at Sandy
Sandy
OR

1,000

7,309

224

1,000

7,533

8,533

1,226

7,307

1999
2011
35 years
Suzanne Elise ALF
Seaside
OR

1,940

4,027


1,940

4,027

5,967

839

5,128

1998
2011
35 years
Necanicum Village
Seaside
OR

2,212

7,311


2,212

7,311

9,523

181

9,342

2001
2015
35 years
Avamere at Sherwood
Sherwood
OR

1,010

7,051

203

1,010

7,254

8,264

1,190

7,074

2000
2011
35 years
Chateau Gardens
Springfield
OR

1,550

4,197


1,550

4,197

5,747

621

5,126

1991
2011
35 years

166


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Avamere at St Helens
St. Helens
OR

1,410

10,496

384

1,410

10,880

12,290

1,663

10,627

2000
2011
35 years
Flagstone Senior Living
The Dalles
OR

1,631

17,786


1,631

17,786

19,417

718

18,699

1991
2014
35 years
Elmcroft of Allison Park
Allison Park
PA

1,171

5,686


1,171

5,686

6,857

1,489

5,368

1986
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Chippewa
Beaver Falls
PA

1,394

8,586


1,394

8,586

9,980

2,249

7,731

1998
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Berwick
Berwick
PA

111

6,741


111

6,741

6,852

1,765

5,087

1998
2006
35 years
Outlook Pointe at Lakemont
Bridgeville
PA

1,660

12,624

82

1,660

12,706

14,366

1,996

12,370

1999
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Dillsburg
Dillsburg
PA

432

7,797


432

7,797

8,229

2,042

6,187

1998
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Altoona
Hollidaysburg
PA

331

4,729


331

4,729

5,060

1,239

3,821

1997
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Lebanon
Lebanon
PA

240

7,336


240

7,336

7,576

1,921

5,655

1999
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Lewisburg
Lewisburg
PA

232

5,666


232

5,666

5,898

1,484

4,414

1999
2006
35 years
Lehigh Commons
Macungie
PA

420

4,406

450

420

4,856

5,276

2,112

3,164

1997
2004
30 years
Elmcroft of Loyalsock
Montoursville
PA

413

3,412


413

3,412

3,825

894

2,931

1999
2006
35 years
Highgate at Paoli Pointe
Paoli
PA

1,151

9,079


1,151

9,079

10,230

3,755

6,475

1997
2004
30 years
Elmcroft of Mid Valley
Peckville
PA

619

11,662


619

11,662

12,281

388

11,893

1998
2014
35 years
Sanatoga Court
Pottstown
PA

360

3,233


360

3,233

3,593

1,402

2,191

1997
2004
30 years
Berkshire Commons
Reading
PA

470

4,301


470

4,301

4,771

1,862

2,909

1997
2004
30 years
Mifflin Court
Reading
PA

689

4,265

351

689

4,616

5,305

1,728

3,577

1997
2004
35 years
Elmcroft of Reading
Reading
PA

638

4,942


638

4,942

5,580

1,294

4,286

1998
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Reedsville
Reedsville
PA

189

5,170


189

5,170

5,359

1,354

4,005

1998
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Saxonburg
Saxonburg
PA

770

5,949


770

5,949

6,719

1,558

5,161

1994
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Shippensburg
Shippensburg
PA

203

7,634


203

7,634

7,837

1,999

5,838

1999
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of State College
State College
PA

320

7,407


320

7,407

7,727

1,940

5,787

1997
2006
35 years
Outlook Pointe at York
York
PA

1,260

6,923

85

1,260

7,008

8,268

1,092

7,176

1999
2011
35 years
Garden House of Anderson SC
Anderson
SC
7,871

969

15,613


969

15,613

16,582

510

16,072

2000
2015
35 years
Forest Pines
Columbia
SC

1,058

27,471


1,058

27,471

28,529

2,061

26,468

1998
2013
35 years
Elmcroft of Florence SC
Florence
SC

108

7,620


108

7,620

7,728

1,996

5,732

1998
2006
35 years
Primrose Aberdeen
Aberdeen
SD

850

659

72

850

731

1,581

231

1,350

1991
2011
35 years
Primrose Place
Aberdeen
SD

310

3,242

12

310

3,254

3,564

495

3,069

2000
2011
35 years
Primrose Rapid City
Rapid City
SD

860

8,722


860

8,722

9,582

1,322

8,260

1997
2011
35 years
Primrose Sioux Falls
Sioux Falls
SD

2,180

12,936

99

2,180

13,035

15,215

1,985

13,230

2002
2011
35 years
Outlook Pointe of Bristol
Bristol
TN

470

16,006

134

470

16,140

16,610

2,274

14,336

1999
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Hamilton Place
Chattanooga
TN

87

4,248


87

4,248

4,335

1,112

3,223

1998
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Shallowford
Chattanooga
TN

580

7,568

455

582

8,021

8,603

1,442

7,161

1999
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Hendersonville
Hendersonville
TN

600

5,304


600

5,304

5,904

178

5,726

1999
2014
35 years
Regency House
Hixson
TN

140

6,611


140

6,611

6,751

982

5,769

2000
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Jackson
Jackson
TN

768

16,840


768

16,840

17,608

559

17,049

1998
2014
35 years
Outlook Pointe at Johnson City
Johnson City
TN

590

10,043

222

590

10,265

10,855

1,472

9,383

1999
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Kingsport
Kingsport
TN

22

7,815


22

7,815

7,837

2,047

5,790

2000
2006
35 years
Arbor Terrace of Knoxville
Knoxville
TN

590

15,862


590

15,862

16,452

527

15,925

1997
2015
35 years

167


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Elmcroft of Halls
Knoxville
TN

387

4,948


387

4,948

5,335

165

5,170

1998
2014
35 years
Elmcroft of West Knoxville
Knoxville
TN

439

10,697


439

10,697

11,136

2,802

8,334

2000
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Lebanon
Lebanon
TN

180

7,086


180

7,086

7,266

1,856

5,410

2000
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Bartlett
Memphis
TN

570

25,552

343

570

25,895

26,465

3,703

22,762

1999
2011
35 years
Kennington Place
Memphis
TN

1,820

4,748

815

1,820

5,563

7,383

1,276

6,107

1989
2011
35 years
Glenmary Senior Manor
Memphis
TN

510

5,860

224

510

6,084

6,594

1,245

5,349

1964
2011
35 years
Outlook Pointe at Murfreesboro
Murfreesboro
TN

940

8,030

259

940

8,289

9,229

1,233

7,996

1999
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Brentwood
Nashville
TN

960

22,020

603

960

22,623

23,583

3,392

20,191

1998
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Arlington
Arlington
TX

2,650

14,060

473

2,650

14,533

17,183

2,309

14,874

1998
2011
35 years
Meadowbrook ALZ
Arlington
TX

755

4,677

940

755

5,617

6,372

557

5,815

2012
2012
35 years
Elmcroft of Austin
Austin
TX

2,770

25,820

534

2,770

26,354

29,124

3,856

25,268

2000
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Bedford
Bedford
TX

770

19,691

493

770

20,184

20,954

3,009

17,945

1999
2011
35 years
Highland Estates
Cedar Park
TX

1,679

28,943


1,679

28,943

30,622

2,177

28,445

2009
2013
35 years
Elmcroft of Rivershire
Conroe
TX

860

32,671

689

860

33,360

34,220

4,785

29,435

1997
2011
35 years
Flower Mound
Flower Mound
TX

900

5,512


900

5,512

6,412

831

5,581

1995
2011
35 years
Arbor House Granbury
Granbury
TX

390

8,186


390

8,186

8,576

816

7,760

2007
2012
35 years
Copperfield Estates
Houston
TX

1,216

21,135


1,216

21,135

22,351

1,590

20,761

2009
2013
35 years
Elmcroft of Braeswood
Houston
TX

3,970

15,919

626

3,970

16,545

20,515

2,586

17,929

1999
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Cy-Fair
Houston
TX

1,580

21,801

419

1,593

22,207

23,800

3,250

20,550

1998
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Irving
Irving
TX

1,620

18,755

455

1,620

19,210

20,830

2,874

17,956

1999
2011
35 years
The Solana at Cinco Ranch
Katy
TX

3,171

73,287


3,171

73,287

76,458

2,136

74,322

2010
2015
35 years
Whitley Place
Keller
TX


5,100



5,100

5,100

1,154

3,946

1998
2008
35 years
Elmcroft of Lake Jackson
Lake Jackson
TX

710

14,765

417

710

15,182

15,892

2,318

13,574

1998
2011
35 years
Arbor House Lewisville
Lewisville
TX

824

10,308


824

10,308

11,132

1,031

10,101

2007
2012
35 years
Elmcroft of Vista Ridge
Lewisville
TX

6,280

10,548

(10,254
)
1,934

4,640

6,574

1,901

4,673

1998
2011
35 years
Polo Park Estates
Midland
TX

765

29,447


765

29,447

30,212

2,205

28,007

1996
2013
35 years
Arbor Hills Memory Care Community
Plano
TX

1,014

5,719


1,014

5,719

6,733

476

6,257

2013
2013
35 years
Arbor House of Rockwall
Rockwall
TX

1,537

12,883


1,537

12,883

14,420

1,296

13,124

2009
2012
35 years
Elmcroft of Windcrest
San Antonio
TX

920

13,011

526

920

13,537

14,457

2,176

12,281

1999
2011
35 years
Paradise Springs
Spring
TX

1,488

24,556


1,488

24,556

26,044

1,848

24,196

2008
2013
35 years
Arbor House of Temple
Temple
TX

473

6,750


473

6,750

7,223

675

6,548

2008
2012
35 years
Elmcroft of Cottonwood
Temple
TX

630

17,515

405

630

17,920

18,550

2,659

15,891

1997
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Mainland
Texas City
TX

520

14,849

504

520

15,353

15,873

2,335

13,538

1996
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Victoria
Victoria
TX

440

13,040

425

440

13,465

13,905

2,061

11,844

1997
2011
35 years
Arbor House of Weatherford
Weatherford
TX

233

3,347


233

3,347

3,580

334

3,246

1994
2012
35 years
Elmcroft of Wharton
Wharton
TX

320

13,799

658

320

14,457

14,777

2,248

12,529

1996
2011
35 years
Mountain Ridge
South Ogden
UT
11,644

1,243

24,659


1,243

24,659

25,902

884

25,018

2001
2014
35 years
Elmcroft of Chesterfield
Richmond
VA

829

6,534


829

6,534

7,363

1,711

5,652

1999
2006
35 years

168


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Pheasant Ridge
Roanoke
VA

1,813

9,027


1,813

9,027

10,840

1,037

9,803

1999
2012
35 years
Cascade Valley Senior Living
Arlington
WA

1,413

6,294


1,413

6,294

7,707

240

7,467

1995
2014
35 years
The Bellingham at Orchard
Bellingham
WA

3,383

17,553


3,383

17,553

20,936

543

20,393

1999
2015
35 years
Bay Pointe
Bremerton
WA

2,114

21,006


2,114

21,006

23,120

667

22,453

1999
2015
35 years
Cooks Hill Manor
Centralia
WA

520

6,144

21

520

6,165

6,685

996

5,689

1993
2011
35 years
Edmonds Landing
Edmonds
WA

4,273

27,852


4,273

27,852

32,125

815

31,310

2001
2015
35 years
Terrace at Beverly Lake
Everett
WA

1,515

12,520


1,515

12,520

14,035

380

13,655

1998
2015
35 years
The Sequoia
Olympia
WA

1,490

13,724

80

1,490

13,804

15,294

2,077

13,217

1995
2011
35 years
Bishop Place Senior Living
Pullman
WA

1,780

33,608


1,780

33,608

35,388

1,258

34,130

1998
2014
35 years
Willow Gardens
Puyallup
WA

1,959

35,492


1,959

35,492

37,451

2,669

34,782

1996
2013
35 years
Birchview
Sedro-Woolley
WA

210

14,145

95

210

14,240

14,450

1,957

12,493

1996
2011
35 years
Discovery Memory Care
Sequim
WA

320

10,544

45

320

10,589

10,909

1,534

9,375

1961
2011
35 years
The Village Retirement & Assisted Living
Tacoma
WA

2,200

5,938

90

2,200

6,028

8,228

1,193

7,035

1976
2011
35 years
Clearwater Springs
Vancouver
WA

1,269

9,840


1,269

9,840

11,109

369

10,740

2003
2015
35 years
Matthews of Appleton I
Appleton
WI

130

1,834

(41
)
130

1,793

1,923

291

1,632

1996
2011
35 years
Matthews of Appleton II
Appleton
WI

140

2,016

100

140

2,116

2,256

316

1,940

1997
2011
35 years
Hunters Ridge
Beaver Dam
WI

260

2,380


260

2,380

2,640

372

2,268

1998
2011
35 years
Harbor House Beloit
Beloit
WI

150

4,356

411

191

4,726

4,917

628

4,289

1990
2011
35 years
Harbor House Clinton
Clinton
WI

290

4,390


290

4,390

4,680

626

4,054

1991
2011
35 years
Creekside
Cudahy
WI

760

1,693


760

1,693

2,453

288

2,165

2001
2011
35 years
Harmony of Denmark
Denmark
WI
1,086

220

2,228


220

2,228

2,448

352

2,096

1995
2011
35 years
Harbor House Eau Claire
Eau Claire
WI

210

6,259


210

6,259

6,469

870

5,599

1996
2011
35 years
Chapel Valley
Fitchburg
WI

450

2,372


450

2,372

2,822

375

2,447

1998
2011
35 years
Matthews of Milwaukee II
Fox Point
WI

1,810

943

37

1,820

970

2,790

218

2,572

1999
2011
35 years
Harmony of Brenwood Park
Franklin
WI
5,672

1,870

13,804


1,870

13,804

15,674

1,926

13,748

2003
2011
35 years
Laurel Oaks
Glendale
WI

2,390

43,587

594

2,390

44,181

46,571

6,199

40,372

1988
2011
35 years
Harmony of Green Bay
Green Bay
WI
2,827

640

5,008


640

5,008

5,648

755

4,893

1990
2011
35 years
Layton Terrace
Greenfield
WI
6,845

3,490

39,201


3,490

39,201

42,691

5,690

37,001

1999
2011
35 years
Matthews of Hartland
Hartland
WI

640

1,663

43

652

1,694

2,346

322

2,024

1985
2011
35 years
Matthews of Horicon
Horicon
WI

340

3,327

(95
)
345

3,227

3,572

564

3,008

2002
2011
35 years
Jefferson
Jefferson
WI

330

2,384


330

2,384

2,714

372

2,342

1997
2011
35 years
Harmony of Kenosha
Kenosha
WI
3,680

1,180

8,717


1,180

8,717

9,897

1,240

8,657

1999
2011
35 years
Harbor House Kenosha
Kenosha
WI

710

3,254

2,793

1,156

5,601

6,757

531

6,226

1996
2011
35 years
Harmony of Madison
Madison
WI
3,809

650

4,279


650

4,279

4,929

690

4,239

1998
2011
35 years
Harmony of Manitowoc
Manitowoc
WI
4,470

450

10,101


450

10,101

10,551

1,434

9,117

1997
2011
35 years
Harbor House Manitowoc
Manitowoc
WI

140

1,520


140

1,520

1,660

229

1,431

1997
2011
35 years
Harmony of McFarland
McFarland
WI
3,415

640

4,647


640

4,647

5,287

721

4,566

1998
2011
35 years
Adare II
Menasha
WI

110

537

20

110

557

667

110

557

1994
2011
35 years

169


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Adare IV
Menasha
WI

110

537

5

110

542

652

104

548

1994
2011
35 years
Adare III
Menasha
WI

90

557

5

90

562

652

111

541

1993
2011
35 years
Adare I
Menasha
WI

90

557

5

90

562

652

106

546

1993
2011
35 years
Riverview Village
Menomonee Falls
WI
5,413

2,170

11,758


2,170

11,758

13,928

1,660

12,268

2003
2011
35 years
The Arboretum
Menomonee Falls
WI

5,640

49,083

583

5,640

49,666

55,306

7,389

47,917

1989
2011
35 years
Matthews of Milwaukee I
Milwaukee
WI

1,800

935

119

1,800

1,054

2,854

222

2,632

1999
2011
35 years
Hart Park Square
Milwaukee
WI
6,600

1,900

21,628


1,900

21,628

23,528

3,160

20,368

2005
2011
35 years
Harbor House Monroe
Monroe
WI

490

4,964


490

4,964

5,454

719

4,735

1990
2011
35 years
Matthews of Neenah I
Neenah
WI

710

1,157

64

713

1,218

1,931

240

1,691

2006
2011
35 years
Matthews of Neenah II
Neenah
WI

720

2,339

(50
)
720

2,289

3,009

403

2,606

2007
2011
35 years
Matthews of Irish Road
Neenah
WI

320

1,036

87

320

1,123

1,443

227

1,216

2001
2011
35 years
Matthews of Oak Creek
Oak Creek
WI

800

2,167

(2
)
812

2,153

2,965

360

2,605

1997
2011
35 years
Harbor House Oconomowoc
Oconomowoc
WI

400

1,596


400

1,596

1,996


1,996

2015
2015
35 years
Wilkinson Woods of Oconomowoc
Oconomowoc
WI

1,100

12,436


1,100

12,436

13,536

1,794

11,742

1992
2011
35 years
Harbor House Oshkosh
Oshkosh
WI

190

949


190

949

1,139

188

951

1993
2011
35 years
Harmony of Racine
Racine
WI
8,954

590

11,726


590

11,726

12,316

1,634

10,682

1998
2011
35 years
Harmony of Commons of Racine
Racine
WI

630

11,245


630

11,245

11,875

1,583

10,292

2003
2011
35 years
Harmony of Sheboygan
Sheboygan
WI
8,286

810

17,908


810

17,908

18,718

2,510

16,208

1996
2011
35 years
Harbor House Sheboygan
Sheboygan
WI

1,060

6,208


1,060

6,208

7,268

879

6,389

1995
2011
35 years
Matthews of St. Francis I
St. Francis
WI

1,370

1,428

(113
)
1,389

1,296

2,685

260

2,425

2000
2011
35 years
Matthews of St. Francis II
St. Francis
WI

1,370

1,666

15

1,377

1,674

3,051

297

2,754

2000
2011
35 years
Howard Village of St. Francis
St. Francis
WI
4,800

2,320

17,232


2,320

17,232

19,552

2,576

16,976

2001
2011
35 years
Harmony of Stevens Point
Stevens Point
WI
7,562

790

10,081


790

10,081

10,871

1,456

9,415

2002
2011
35 years
Harmony Commons of Stevens Point
Stevens Point
WI

760

2,242


760

2,242

3,002

430

2,572

2005
2011
35 years
Harmony of Stoughton
Stoughton
WI
1,502

490

9,298


490

9,298

9,788

1,322

8,466

1997
2011
35 years
Harbor House Stoughton
Stoughton
WI

450

3,191


450

3,191

3,641

500

3,141

1992
2011
35 years
Harmony of Two Rivers
Two Rivers
WI
2,413

330

3,538


330

3,538

3,868

542

3,326

1998
2011
35 years
Matthews of Pewaukee
Waukesha
WI

1,180

4,124

206

1,197

4,313

5,510

741

4,769

2001
2011
35 years
Oak Hill Terrace
Waukesha
WI
4,835

2,040

40,298


2,040

40,298

42,338

5,864

36,474

1985
2011
35 years
Harmony of Terrace Court
Wausau
WI
6,730

430

5,037


430

5,037

5,467

750

4,717

1996
2011
35 years
Harmony of Terrace Commons
Wausau
WI

740

6,556


740

6,556

7,296

983

6,313

2000
2011
35 years
Harbor House Rib Mountain
Wausau
WI

350

3,413


350

3,413

3,763

500

3,263

1997
2011
35 years
Library Square
West Allis
WI
5,150

1,160

23,714


1,160

23,714

24,874

3,455

21,419

1996
2011
35 years
Harmony of Wisconsin Rapids
Wisconsin Rapids
WI
1,006

520

4,349


520

4,349

4,869

686

4,183

2000
2011
35 years
Matthews of Wrightstown
Wrightstown
WI

140

376

12

140

388

528

110

418

1999
2011
35 years
Outlook Pointe at Teays Valley
Hurricane
WV

1,950

14,489

106

1,950

14,595

16,545

2,049

14,496

1999
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Martinsburg
Martinsburg
WV

248

8,320


248

8,320

8,568

2,179

6,389

1999
2006
35 years

170


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Garden Square Assisted Living of Casper
Casper
WY

355

3,197


355

3,197

3,552

428

3,124

1996
2011
35 years
Whispering Chase
Cheyenne
WY

1,800

20,354


1,800

20,354

22,154

1,537

20,617

2008
2013
35 years
Ashridge Court
Bexhill-on-Sea
East Sussex

2,274

4,791


2,274

4,791

7,065

173

6,892

2010
2015
40 years
Inglewood Nursing Home
Eastbourne
East Sussex

1,908

3,021


1,908

3,021

4,929

126

4,803

2010
2015
40 years
Pentlow Nursing Home
Eastbourne
East Sussex

1,964

2,462


1,964

2,462

4,426

109

4,317

2007
2015
40 years
Willows Care Home
Romford
Essex

4,695

6,983


4,695

6,983

11,678

138

11,540

1986
2015
40 years
Cedars Care Home
Southend-on-Sea
Essex

2,649

4,925


2,649

4,925

7,574

100

7,474

2014
2015
40 years
Mayflower Care Home
Northfleet
Gravesand

4,330

7,519


4,330

7,519

11,849

152

11,697

2012
2015
40 years
Maples Care Home
Bexleyheath
Kent

5,042

7,525


5,042

7,525

12,567

150

12,417

2007
2015
40 years
Barty House Nursing Home
Maidstone
Kent

3,769

3,089


3,769

3,089

6,858

139

6,719

2013
2015
40 years
Tunbridge Wells Care Centre
Tunbridge Wells
Kent

4,323

5,869


4,323

5,869

10,192

203

9,989

2010
2015
40 years
Heathlands Care Home
Chingford
London

5,398

7,967


5,398

7,967

13,365

162

13,203

1980
2015
40 years
TOTAL FOR OTHER SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES
 
 
244,234

526,342

4,729,528

31,302

523,209

4,763,963

5,287,172

579,112

4,708,060

 
 
 
TOTAL FOR SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES
 
 
1,363,146

1,481,140

13,759,148

311,457

1,472,492

14,079,253

15,551,745

2,475,796

13,075,949

 
 
 


171


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
St. Vincent's Medical Center East #46
Birmingham
AL


25,298

3,892


29,190

29,190

6,094

23,096

2005
2010
35 years
St. Vincent's Medical Center East #48
Birmingham
AL


12,698

418


13,116

13,116

2,801

10,315

1989
2010
35 years
St. Vincent's Medical Center East #52
Birmingham
AL


7,608

1,064


8,672

8,672

2,213

6,459

1985
2010
35 years
Crestwood Medical Pavilion
Huntsville
AL
4,134

625

16,178

76

625

16,254

16,879

2,626

14,253

1994
2011
35 years
Davita Dialysis - Marked Tree
Marked Tree
AR

179

1,580


179

1,580

1,759

60

1,699

2009
2015
35 years
West Valley Medical Center
Buckeye
AZ

3,348

5,233


3,348

5,233

8,581

243

8,338

2011
2015
31 years
Canyon Springs Medical Plaza
Gilbert
AZ
15,322


27,497

66


27,563

27,563

3,941

23,622

2007
2012
35 years
Mercy Gilbert Medical Plaza
Gilbert
AZ
7,620

720

11,277

559

720

11,836

12,556

2,207

10,349

2007
2011
35 years
Thunderbird Paseo Medical Plaza
Glendale
AZ


12,904

615

20

13,499

13,519

1,929

11,590

1997
2011
35 years
Thunderbird Paseo Medical Plaza II
Glendale
AZ


8,100

472

20

8,552

8,572

1,320

7,252

2001
2011
35 years
Desert Medical Pavilion
Mesa
AZ


32,768

129


32,897

32,897

2,905

29,992

2003
2013
35 years
Desert Samaritan Medical Building I
Mesa
AZ


11,923

516


12,439

12,439

1,758

10,681

1977
2011
35 years
Desert Samaritan Medical Building II
Mesa
AZ


7,395

101


7,496

7,496

1,179

6,317

1980
2011
35 years
Desert Samaritan Medical Building III
Mesa
AZ


13,665

1,043


14,708

14,708

2,093

12,615

1986
2011
35 years
Deer Valley Medical Office Building II
Phoenix
AZ
12,919


22,663

589

14

23,238

23,252

3,323

19,929

2002
2011
35 years
Deer Valley Medical Office Building III
Phoenix
AZ
10,649


19,521

30

12

19,539

19,551

2,813

16,738

2009
2011
35 years
Papago Medical Park
Phoenix
AZ


12,172

459


12,631

12,631

2,070

10,561

1989
2011
35 years
North Valley Orthopedic Surgery Center
Phoenix
AZ

2,800

10,150


2,800

10,150

12,950

354

12,596

2006
2015
35 years
Burbank Medical Plaza
Burbank
CA

1,241

23,322

1,015

1,241

24,337

25,578

4,242

21,336

2004
2011
35 years
Burbank Medical Plaza II
Burbank
CA
35,006

491

45,641

221

491

45,862

46,353

6,767

39,586

2008
2011
35 years
Eden Medical Plaza
Castro Valley
CA

258

2,455

276

258

2,731

2,989

758

2,231

1998
2011
25 years
United Healthcare - Cypress
Cypress
CA

12,883

38,309


12,883

38,309

51,192

1,701

49,491

1985
2015
29 years
NorthBay Corporate Headquarters
Fairfield
CA


19,187



19,187

19,187

1,837

17,350

2008
2012
35 years
Gateway Medical Plaza
Fairfield
CA


12,872

24


12,896

12,896

1,230

11,666

1986
2012
35 years
Solano NorthBay Health Plaza
Fairfield
CA


8,880



8,880

8,880

843

8,037

1990
2012
35 years
NorthBay Healthcare MOB
Fairfield
CA


8,507

2,280


10,787

10,787

997

9,790

2014
2013
35 years
UC Davis Medical
Folsom
CA

1,873

10,156


1,873

10,156

12,029

385

11,644

1995
2015
35 years
Verdugo Hills Professional Bldg I
Glendale
CA

6,683

9,589

336

6,683

9,925

16,608

2,305

14,303

1972
2012
23 years
Verdugo Hills Professional Bldg II
Glendale
CA

4,464

3,731

515

4,464

4,246

8,710

1,270

7,440

1987
2012
19 years

172


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
St. Francis Lynwood Medical
Lynwood
CA

688

8,385

730

688

9,115

9,803

2,346

7,457

1993
2011
32 years
PMB Mission Hills
Mission Hills
CA

15,468

30,116

4,729

15,468

34,845

50,313

3,095

47,218

2012
2012
35 years
PDP Mission Viejo
Mission Viejo
CA
58,490

1,916

77,022

226

1,916

77,248

79,164

11,775

67,389

2007
2011
35 years
PDP Orange
Orange
CA
46,513

1,752

61,647

232

1,761

61,870

63,631

9,680

53,951

2008
2011
35 years
NHP/PMB Pasadena
Pasadena
CA

3,138

83,412

8,590

3,138

92,002

95,140

16,041

79,099

2009
2011
35 years
Western University of Health Sciences Medical Pavilion
Pomona
CA

91

31,523


91

31,523

31,614

4,532

27,082

2009
2011
35 years
Pomerado Outpatient Pavilion
Poway
CA

3,233

71,435

2,858

3,233

74,293

77,526

12,439

65,087

2007
2011
35 years
Sutter Medical Center
San Diego
CA


25,088

1,371


26,459

26,459

2,301

24,158

2012
2012
35 years
San Gabriel Valley Medical
San Gabriel
CA

914

5,510

346

914

5,856

6,770

1,467

5,303

2004
2011
35 years
Santa Clarita Valley Medical
Santa Clarita
CA
23,000

9,708

20,020

443

9,726

20,445

30,171

3,496

26,675

2005
2011
35 years
Kenneth E Watts Medical Plaza
Torrance
CA

262

6,945

1,238

291

8,154

8,445

2,095

6,350

1989
2011
23 years
Vaca Valley Health Plaza
Vacaville
CA


9,634

2


9,636

9,636

912

8,724

1988
2012
35 years
Potomac Medical Plaza
Aurora
CO

2,401

9,118

2,181

2,464

11,236

13,700

4,720

8,980

1986
2007
35 years
Briargate Medical Campus
Colorado Springs
CO

1,238

12,301

313

1,244

12,608

13,852

3,987

9,865

2002
2007
35 years
Printers Park Medical Plaza
Colorado Springs
CO

2,641

47,507

1,415

2,641

48,922

51,563

15,033

36,530

1999
2007
35 years
Green Valley Ranch MOB
Denver
CO
5,797


12,139

158

235

12,062

12,297

1,110

11,187

2007
2012
35 years
Community Physicians Pavilion
Lafayette
CO


10,436

1,590


12,026

12,026

2,517

9,509

2004
2010
35 years
Exempla Good Samaritan Medical Center
Lafayette
CO


4,393



4,393

4,393

257

4,136

2013
2013
35 years
Dakota Ridge
Littleton
CO

2,540

12,901


2,540

12,901

15,441

458

14,983

2007
2015
35 years
Avista Two Medical Plaza
Louisville
CO


17,330

1,676


19,006

19,006

4,813

14,193

2003
2009
35 years
The Sierra Medical Building
Parker
CO

1,444

14,059

3,072

1,492

17,083

18,575

4,969

13,606

2009
2009
35 years
Crown Point Healthcare Plaza
Parker
CO

852

5,210


852

5,210

6,062

477

5,585

2008
2013
35 years
Lutheran Medical Office Building II
Wheat Ridge
CO


2,655

875


3,530

3,530

984

2,546

1976
2010
35 years
Lutheran Medical Office Building IV
Wheat Ridge
CO


7,266

923


8,189

8,189

1,827

6,362

1991
2010
35 years
Lutheran Medical Office Building III
Wheat Ridge
CO


11,947

107


12,054

12,054

2,576

9,478

2004
2010
35 years
DePaul Professional Office Building
Washington
DC


6,424

1,856


8,280

8,280

2,540

5,740

1987
2010
35 years
Providence Medical Office Building
Washington
DC


2,473

520


2,993

2,993

1,081

1,912

1975
2010
35 years
RTS Arcadia
Arcadia
FL

345

2,884


345

2,884

3,229

533

2,696

1993
2011
30 years
Aventura Medical Plaza
Aventura
FL

401

3,338


401

3,338

3,739

256

3,483

1996
2015
26 years
RTS Cape Coral
Cape Coral
FL

368

5,448


368

5,448

5,816

851

4,965

1984
2011
34 years
RTS Englewood
Englewood
FL

1,071

3,516


1,071

3,516

4,587

589

3,998

1992
2011
35 years
RTS Ft. Myers
Fort Myers
FL

1,153

4,127


1,153

4,127

5,280

773

4,507

1989
2011
31 years
RTS Key West
Key West
FL

486

4,380


486

4,380

4,866

609

4,257

1987
2011
35 years

173


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
JFK Medical Plaza
Lake Worth
FL

453

1,711

139

453

1,850

2,303

691

1,612

1999
2004
35 years
East Pointe Medical Plaza
Leigh Acres
FL
5,260

327

11,816


327

11,816

12,143

380

11,763

1994
2015
35 years
Palms West Building 6
Loxahatchee
FL

965

2,678

52

965

2,730

3,695

909

2,786

2000
2004
35 years
Bay Medical Plaza
Lynn Haven
FL
9,579

4,215

15,041


4,215

15,041

19,256

557

18,699

2003
2015
35 years
Aventura Heart & Health
Miami
FL
15,680


25,361

2,979


28,340

28,340

9,914

18,426

2006
2007
35 years
RTS Naples
Naples
FL

1,152

3,726


1,152

3,726

4,878

589

4,289

1999
2011
35 years
Bay Medical Center
Panama City
FL
9,321

82

17,400


82

17,400

17,482

559

16,923

1987
2015
35 years
Woodlands Center for Specialized Med
Pensacola
FL
14,914

2,518

24,006

29

2,518

24,035

26,553

3,513

23,040

2009
2012
35 years
RTS Pt. Charlotte
Pt Charlotte
FL

966

4,581


966

4,581

5,547

760

4,787

1985
2011
34 years
RTS Sarasota
Sarasota
FL

1,914

3,889


1,914

3,889

5,803

680

5,123

1996
2011
35 years
Capital Regional MOB I
Tallahassee
FL

590

8,773


590

8,773

9,363

251

9,112

1998
2015
35 years
University Medical Office Building
Tamarac
FL


6,690

132


6,822

6,822

2,316

4,506

2006
2007
35 years
RTS Venice
Venice
FL

1,536

4,104


1,536

4,104

5,640

690

4,950

1997
2011
35 years
Athens Medical Complex
Athens
GA

2,826

18,339


2,826

18,339

21,165

625

20,540

2011
2015
35 years
Doctors Center at St. Joseph’s Hospital
Atlanta
GA

545

80,152


545

80,152

80,697

740

79,957

1978
2015
20 years
Augusta Medical Plaza
Augusta
GA

594

4,847

517

594

5,364

5,958

1,474

4,484

1972
2011
25 years
Augusta Professional Building
Augusta
GA

687

6,057

657

691

6,710

7,401

1,882

5,519

1983
2011
27 years
Augusta POB I
Augusta
GA

233

7,894

507

233

8,401

8,634

2,971

5,663

1978
2012
14 years
Augusta POB II
Augusta
GA

735

13,717

159

735

13,876

14,611

3,446

11,165

1987
2012
23 years
Augusta POB III
Augusta
GA

535

3,857

212

535

4,069

4,604

1,192

3,412

1994
2012
22 years
Augusta POB IV
Augusta
GA

675

2,182

892

675

3,074

3,749

942

2,807

1995
2012
23 years
Cobb Physicians Center
Austell
GA

1,145

16,805

919

1,145

17,724

18,869

3,691

15,178

1992
2011
35 years
Summit Professional Plaza I
Brunswick
GA
5,096

1,821

2,974

42

1,821

3,016

4,837

2,669

2,168

2004
2012
31 years
Summit Professional Plaza II
Brunswick
GA
10,829

981

13,818

10

981

13,828

14,809

2,378

12,431

1998
2012
35 years
Columbia Medical Plaza
Evans
GA

268

1,497

139

268

1,636

1,904

572

1,332

1940
2011
23 years
Fayette MOB
Fayetteville
GA

895

20,669


895

20,669

21,564

672

20,892

2004
2015
35 years
Northside East Cobb - 1121
Marietta
GA

5,495

16,028


5,495

16,028

21,523

590

20,933

1991
2015
35 years
PAPP Clinic
Newnan
GA

2,167

5,477


2,167

5,477

7,644

253

7,391

1994
2015
30 years
Parkway Physicians Center
Ringgold
GA

476

10,017

419

476

10,436

10,912

2,047

8,865

2004
2011
35 years
Riverdale MOB
Riverdale
GA

1,025

9,783


1,025

9,783

10,808

365

10,443

2005
2015
35 years
Eastside Physicians Center
Snellville
GA

1,289

25,019

1,937

1,366

26,879

28,245

7,126

21,119

1994
2008
35 years
Eastside Physicians Plaza
Snellville
GA

294

12,948

53

297

12,998

13,295

3,176

10,119

2003
2008
35 years
Rush Copley POB I
Aurora
IL

120

27,882


120

27,882

28,002

907

27,095

1996
2015
34 years
Rush Copley POB II
Aurora
IL

49

27,217


49

27,217

27,266

859

26,407

2009
2015
35 years
Good Shepherd Physician Office Building I
Barrington
IL

152

3,224

83

152

3,307

3,459

274

3,185

1979
2013
35 years
Good Shepherd Physician Office Building II
Barrington
IL

512

12,977

142

512

13,119

13,631

1,129

12,502

1996
2013
35 years

174


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Trinity Hospital Physician Office Building
Chicago
IL

139

3,329

213

139

3,542

3,681

328

3,353

1971
2013
35 years
Advocate Beverly Center
Chicago
IL

2,227

10,140


2,227

10,140

12,367

495

11,872

1986
2015
25 years
Crystal Lakes Medical Arts
Crystal Lake
IL

2,490

19,504


2,490

19,504

21,994

702

21,292

2007
2015
35 years
Advocate Good Shepard
Crystal Lake
IL

2,444

10,953


2,444

10,953

13,397

456

12,941

2008
2015
33 years
Physicians Plaza East
Decatur
IL


791

612


1,403

1,403

596

807

1976
2010
35 years
Physicians Plaza West
Decatur
IL


1,943

354


2,297

2,297

760

1,537

1987
2010
35 years
Kenwood Medical Center
Decatur
IL


3,900

51


3,951

3,951

1,252

2,699

1996
2010
35 years
304 W Hay Building
Decatur
IL


8,702

193


8,895

8,895

2,115

6,780

2002
2010
35 years
302 W Hay Building
Decatur
IL


3,467

156


3,623

3,623

1,147

2,476

1993
2010
35 years
ENTA
Decatur
IL


1,150



1,150

1,150

304

846

1996
2010
35 years
301 W Hay Building
Decatur
IL


640



640

640

234

406

1980
2010
35 years
South Shore Medical Building
Decatur
IL

902

129


902

129

1,031

145

886

1991
2010
35 years
SIU Family Practice
Decatur
IL


1,689

19


1,708

1,708

457

1,251

1997
2010
35 years
Corporate Health Services
Decatur
IL

934

1,386


934

1,386

2,320

450

1,870

1996
2010
35 years
Rock Springs Medical
Decatur
IL

399

495


399

495

894

171

723

1990
2010
35 years
575 W Hay Building
Decatur
IL

111

739


111

739

850

215

635

1984
2010
35 years
Good Samaritan Physician Office Building I
Downers Grove
IL

407

10,337

228

407

10,565

10,972

886

10,086

1976
2013
35 years
Good Samaritan Physician Office Building II
Downers Grove
IL

1,013

25,370

366

1,013

25,736

26,749

2,133

24,616

1995
2013
35 years
Eberle Medical Office Building ("Eberle MOB")
Elk Grove Village
IL


16,315

93


16,408

16,408

5,453

10,955

2005
2009
35 years
1425 Hunt Club Road MOB
Gurnee
IL

249

1,452

75

249

1,527

1,776

419

1,357

2005
2011
34 years
1445 Hunt Club Drive
Gurnee
IL

216

1,405

309

216

1,714

1,930

588

1,342

2002
2011
31 years
Gurnee Imaging Center
Gurnee
IL

82

2,731


82

2,731

2,813

453

2,360

2002
2011
35 years
Gurnee Center Club
Gurnee
IL

627

17,851


627

17,851

18,478

3,113

15,365

2001
2011
35 years
South Suburban Hospital Physician Office Building
Hazel Crest
IL

191

4,370

150

191

4,520

4,711

427

4,284

1989
2013
35 years
Doctors Office Building III ("DOB III")
Hoffman Estates
IL


24,550

77


24,627

24,627

7,117

17,510

2005
2009
35 years
755 Milwaukee MOB
Libertyville
IL

421

3,716

1,012

479

4,670

5,149

1,822

3,327

1990
2011
18 years
890 Professional MOB
Libertyville
IL

214

2,630

139

214

2,769

2,983

707

2,276

1980
2011
26 years
Libertyville Center Club
Libertyville
IL

1,020

17,176


1,020

17,176

18,196

3,077

15,119

1988
2011
35 years
Christ Medical Center Physician Office Building
Oak Lawn
IL

658

16,421

51

658

16,472

17,130

1,374

15,756

1986
2013
35 years
Methodist North MOB
Peoria
IL

1,025

29,493


1,025

29,493

30,518

964

29,554

2010
2015
35 years
Davita Dialysis - Rockford
Rockford
IL

256

2,543


256

2,543

2,799

98

2,701

2009
2015
35 years
Round Lake ACC
Round Lake
IL

758

370

302

785

645

1,430

373

1,057

1984
2011
13 years
Vernon Hills Acute Care Center
Vernon Hills
IL

3,376

694

181

3,413

838

4,251

469

3,782

1986
2011
15 years
Wilbur S. Roby Building
Anderson
IN


2,653

621


3,274

3,274

971

2,303

1992
2010
35 years

175


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Ambulatory Services Building
Anderson
IN


4,266

1,350


5,616

5,616

1,664

3,952

1995
2010
35 years
St. John's Medical Arts Building
Anderson
IN


2,281

426


2,707

2,707

823

1,884

1973
2010
35 years
Carmel I
Carmel
IN

466

5,954

222

466

6,176

6,642

1,149

5,493

1985
2012
30 years
Carmel II
Carmel
IN

455

5,976

221

455

6,197

6,652

1,042

5,610

1989
2012
33 years
Carmel III
Carmel
IN

422

6,194

385

422

6,579

7,001

960

6,041

2001
2012
35 years
Elkhart
Elkhart
IN

1,256

1,973


1,256

1,973

3,229

769

2,460

1994
2011
32 years
Lutheran Medical Arts
Fort Wayne
IN

702

13,576


702

13,576

14,278

469

13,809

2000
2015
35 years
Dupont Road MOB
Fort Wayne
IN

633

13,479


633

13,479

14,112

501

13,611

2001
2015
35 years
Harcourt Professional Office Building
Indianapolis
IN

519

28,951

1,003

519

29,954

30,473

5,209

25,264

1973
2012
28 years
Cardiac Professional Office Building
Indianapolis
IN

498

27,430

467

498

27,897

28,395

3,939

24,456

1995
2012
35 years
Oncology Medical Office Building
Indianapolis
IN

470

5,703

152

470

5,855

6,325

1,053

5,272

2003
2012
35 years
St. Francis South Medical Office Building
Indianapolis
IN


20,649

744


21,393

21,393

2,081

19,312

1995
2013
35 years
Methodist Professional Center I
Indianapolis
IN

61

37,411

2,896

61

40,307

40,368

6,795

33,573

1985
2012
25 years
Indiana Orthopedic Center of Excellence
Indianapolis
IN

967

83,746


967

83,746

84,713

1,273

83,440

1997
2015
35 years
United Healthcare - Indy
Indianapolis
IN

5,737

32,116


5,737

32,116

37,853

1,131

36,722

1988
2015
35 years
LaPorte
La Porte
IN

553

1,309


553

1,309

1,862

331

1,531

1997
2011
34 years
Mishawaka
Mishawaka
IN

3,787

5,543


3,787

5,543

9,330

2,244

7,086

1993
2011
35 years
Cancer Care Partners
Mishawaka
IN

3,162

28,633


3,162

28,633

31,795

914

30,881

2010
2015
35 years
Michiana Oncology
Mishawaka
IN

4,577

20,939


4,577

20,939

25,516

700

24,816

2010
2015
35 years
DaVita Dialysis - Paoli
Paoli
IN

396

2,056


396

2,056

2,452

81

2,371

2011
2015
35 years
South Bend
South Bend
IN

792

2,530


792

2,530

3,322

530

2,792

1996
2011
34 years
Via Christi Clinic
Wichita
KS

1,883

7,428


1,883

7,428

9,311

290

9,021

2006
2015
35 years
OLBH Same Day Surgery Center MOB
Ashland
KY

101

19,066

208

101

19,274

19,375

3,262

16,113

1997
2012
26 years
St. Elizabeth Covington
Covington
KY

345

12,790

(16
)
345

12,774

13,119

1,865

11,254

2009
2012
35 years
St. Elizabeth Florence MOB
Florence
KY

402

8,279

1,082

402

9,361

9,763

1,713

8,050

2005
2012
35 years
Jefferson Clinic
Louisville
KY


673

2,018


2,691

2,691

109

2,582

2013
2013
35 years
East Jefferson Medical Plaza
Metairie
LA

168

17,264

162

168

17,426

17,594

3,974

13,620

1996
2012
32 years
East Jefferson MOB
Metairie
LA

107

15,137

280

107

15,417

15,524

3,341

12,183

1985
2012
28 years
Lakeside POB I
Metairie
LA

3,334

4,974

2,259

3,334

7,233

10,567

2,090

8,477

1986
2011
22 years
Lakeside POB II
Metairie
LA

1,046

802

680

1,046

1,482

2,528

642

1,886

1980
2011
7 years
Fresenius Medical
Metairie
LA

1,195

3,797


1,195

3,797

4,992

134

4,858

2012
2015
35 years
RTS Berlin
Berlin
MD


2,216



2,216

2,216

378

1,838

1994
2011
29 years
Charles O. Fisher Medical Building
Westminster
MD
11,091


13,795

1,747


15,542

15,542

4,786

10,756

2009
2009
35 years
Medical Specialties Building
Kalamazoo
MI


19,242

1,366


20,608

20,608

4,234

16,374

1989
2010
35 years

176


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
North Professional Building
Kalamazoo
MI


7,228

1,601


8,829

8,829

1,786

7,043

1983
2010
35 years
Borgess Navigation Center
Kalamazoo
MI


2,391



2,391

2,391

570

1,821

1976
2010
35 years
Borgess Health & Fitness Center
Kalamazoo
MI


11,959

244


12,203

12,203

2,887

9,316

1984
2010
35 years
Heart Center Building
Kalamazoo
MI


8,420

383


8,803

8,803

2,207

6,596

1980
2010
35 years
Medical Commons Building
Kalamazoo Township
MI


661

568


1,229

1,229

199

1,030

1979
2010
35 years
RTS Madison Heights
Madison Heights
MI

401

2,946


401

2,946

3,347

483

2,864

2002
2011
35 years
RTS Monroe
Monroe
MI

281

3,450


281

3,450

3,731

635

3,096

1997
2011
31 years
Bronson Lakeview OPC
Paw Paw
MI

3,835

31,564


3,835

31,564

35,399

1,141

34,258

2006
2015
35 years
Pro Med Center Plainwell
Plainwell
MI


697



697

697

185

512

1991
2010
35 years
Pro Med Center Richland
Richland
MI

233

2,267

30

233

2,297

2,530

520

2,010

1996
2010
35 years
Henry Ford Dialysis Center
Southfield
MI

589

3,350


589

3,350

3,939

120

3,819

2002
2015
35 years
Metro Health
Wyoming
MI

1,325

5,479


1,325

5,479

6,804

207

6,597

2008
2015
35 years
Spectrum Health
Wyoming
MI

2,463

14,353


2,463

14,353

16,816

543

16,273

2006
2015
35 years
Cogdell Duluth MOB
Duluth
MN


33,406

(19
)

33,387

33,387

3,254

30,133

2012
2012
35 years
Allina Health
Elk River
MN

1,442

7,742


1,442

7,742

9,184

267

8,917

2002
2015
35 years
Unitron Hearing
Plymouth
MN
4,000

2,646

8,962


2,646

8,962

11,608

475

11,133

2011
2015
29 years
HealthPartners Medical & Dental Clinics
Sartell
MN

2,492

15,694

49

2,503

15,732

18,235

2,493

15,742

2010
2012
35 years
Arnold Urgent Care
Arnold
MO

1,058

556

95

1,097

612

1,709

365

1,344

1999
2011
35 years



177


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
DePaul Health Center North
Bridgeton
MO

996

10,045

794

996

10,839

11,835

2,542

9,293

1976
2012
21 years
DePaul Health Center South
Bridgeton
MO

910

12,169

502

910

12,671

13,581

2,374

11,207

1992
2012
30 years
St. Mary's Health Center MOB D
Clayton
MO

103

2,780

718

103

3,498

3,601

852

2,749

1984
2012
22 years
Fenton Urgent Care Center
Fenton
MO

183

2,714

224

189

2,932

3,121

738

2,383

2003
2011
35 years
St. Joseph Medical Building
Kansas City
MO

305

7,445

2,167

305

9,612

9,917

1,212

8,705

1988
2012
32 years
St. Joseph Medical Mall
Kansas City
MO

530

9,115

212

530

9,327

9,857

1,516

8,341

1995
2012
33 years
Carondelet Medical Building
Kansas City
MO

745

12,437

612

745

13,049

13,794

2,256

11,538

1979
2012
29 years
St. Joseph Hospital West Medical Office Building II
Lake Saint Louis
MO

524

3,229

156

524

3,385

3,909

659

3,250

2005
2012
35 years
St. Joseph O'Fallon Medical Office Building
O'Fallon
MO

940

5,556

9

940

5,565

6,505

839

5,666

1992
2012
35 years
Sisters of Mercy Building
Springfield
MO
5,500

3,427

8,697


3,427

8,697

12,124

350

11,774

2008
2015
35 years
St. Joseph Health Center Medical Building 1
St. Charles
MO

503

4,336

365

503

4,701

5,204

1,227

3,977

1987
2012
20 years
St. Joseph Health Center Medical Building 2
St. Charles
MO

369

2,963

162

369

3,125

3,494

650

2,844

1999
2012
32 years
Physicians Office Center
St. Louis
MO

1,445

13,825

325

1,445

14,150

15,595

3,678

11,917

2003
2011
35 years
12700 Southford Road Medical Plaza
St. Louis
MO

595

12,584

1,077

595

13,661

14,256

3,392

10,864

1993
2011
32 years
St Anthony's MOB A
St. Louis
MO

409

4,687

607

409

5,294

5,703

1,592

4,111

1975
2011
20 years
St Anthony's MOB B
St. Louis
MO

350

3,942

437

350

4,379

4,729

1,515

3,214

1980
2011
21 years
Lemay Urgent Care Center
St. Louis
MO

2,317

3,120

317

2,339

3,415

5,754

1,261

4,493

1983
2011
22 years
St. Mary's Health Center MOB B
St. Louis
MO

119

4,161

4,278

119

8,439

8,558

1,046

7,512

1979
2012
23 years
St. Mary's Health Center MOB C
St. Louis
MO

136

6,018

362

136

6,380

6,516

1,263

5,253

1969
2012
20 years
University Physicians - Grants Ferry
Flowood
MS
9,339

2,796

12,125

(13
)
2,796

12,112

14,908

1,922

12,986

2010
2012
35 years
Randolph
Charlotte
NC

6,370

2,929

1,155

6,370

4,084

10,454

2,550

7,904

1973
2012
4 years
Mallard Crossing I
Charlotte
NC

3,229

2,072

352

3,229

2,424

5,653

1,140

4,513

1997
2012
25 years
Medical Arts Building
Concord
NC

701

11,734

502

701

12,236

12,937

2,689

10,248

1997
2012
31 years
Gateway Medical Office Building
Concord
NC

1,100

9,904

487

1,100

10,391

11,491

2,249

9,242

2005
2012
35 years
Copperfield Medical Mall
Concord
NC

1,980

2,846

287

1,980

3,133

5,113

919

4,194

1989
2012
25 years
Weddington Internal & Pediatric Medicine
Concord
NC

574

688

13

574

701

1,275

213

1,062

2000
2012
27 years
Rex Wellness Center
Garner
NC

1,348

5,330


1,348

5,330

6,678

249

6,429

2003
2015
34 years
Gaston Professional Center
Gastonia
NC

833

24,885

704

833

25,589

26,422

3,993

22,429

1997
2012
35 years
Harrisburg Family Physicians
Harrisburg
NC

679

1,646

63

679

1,709

2,388

290

2,098

1996
2012
35 years
Harrisburg Medical Mall
Harrisburg
NC

1,339

2,292

169

1,339

2,461

3,800

749

3,051

1997
2012
27 years
Birkdale
Huntersville
NC

4,271

7,206

292

4,271

7,498

11,769

1,774

9,995

1997
2012
35 years
Birkdale II
Huntersville
NC



27


27

27

5

22

2001
2012
35 years

178


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Northcross
Huntersville
NC

623

278

36

623

314

937

177

760

1993
2012
22 years
REX Knightdale MOB & Wellness Center
Knightdale
NC


22,823

425


23,248

23,248

2,156

21,092

2009
2012
35 years
Midland Medical Park
Midland
NC

1,221

847

58

1,221

905

2,126

370

1,756

1998
2012
25 years
East Rocky Mount Kidney Center
Rocky Mount
NC

803

998

(2
)
803

996

1,799

274

1,525

2000
2012
33 years
Rocky Mount Kidney Center
Rocky Mount
NC

479

1,297

39

479

1,336

1,815

382

1,433

1990
2012
25 years
Rocky Mount Medical Park
Rocky Mount
NC

2,552

7,779

646

2,652

8,325

10,977

1,722

9,255

1991
2012
30 years
English Road Medical Center
Rocky Mount
NC
4,312

1,321

3,747

4

1,321

3,751

5,072

948

4,124

2002
2012
35 years
Rowan Outpatient Surgery Center
Salisbury
NC

1,039

5,184

(5
)
1,039

5,179

6,218

863

5,355

2003
2012
35 years
Trinity Health Medical Arts Clinic
Minot
ND

935

15,482


935

15,482

16,417

718

15,699

1995
2015
26 years
Cooper Health MOB I
Willingboro
NJ

1,389

2,742


1,389

2,742

4,131

130

4,001

2010
2015
35 years
Cooper Health MOB II
Willingboro
NJ

594

5,638


594

5,638

6,232

190

6,042

2012
2015
35 years
Salem Medical
Woodstown
NJ

275

4,132


275

4,132

4,407

138

4,269

2010
2015
35 years
Carson Tahoe Specialty Medical Center
Carson City
NV

688

11,346


688

11,346

12,034

418

11,616

1981
2015
35 years
Carson Tahoe MOB West
Carson City
NV

2,862

27,519


2,862

27,519

30,381

1,209

29,172

2007
2015
29 years
Del E Webb Medical Plaza
Henderson
NV

1,028

16,993

958

1,028

17,951

18,979

3,574

15,405

1999
2011
35 years
Durango Medical Plaza
Las Vegas
NV

3,787

27,738


3,787

27,738

31,525

946

30,579

2008
2015
35 years
The Terrace at South Meadows
Reno
NV
6,959

504

9,966

483

504

10,449

10,953

2,203

8,750

2004
2011
35 years
Albany Medical Center MOB
Albany
NY

321

18,389


321

18,389

18,710

529

18,181

2010
2015
35 years
St. Peter's Recovery Center
Guilderland
NY

1,059

9,156


1,059

9,156

10,215

354

9,861

1990
2015
35 years
Central NY Medical Center
Syracuse
NY
24,500

1,786

26,101

1,711

1,792

27,806

29,598

4,630

24,968

1997
2012
33 years
Northcountry MOB
Watertown
NY

1,320

10,799


1,320

10,799

12,119

427

11,692

2001
2015
35 years
Anderson Medical Arts Building I
Cincinnati
OH


9,632

1,737


11,369

11,369

3,769

7,600

1984
2007
35 years
Anderson Medical Arts Building II
Cincinnati
OH


15,123

2,276


17,399

17,399

5,526

11,873

2007
2007
35 years
Riverside North Medical Office Building
Columbus
OH
8,420

785

8,519

936

785

9,455

10,240

2,185

8,055

1962
2012
25 years
Riverside South Medical Office Building
Columbus
OH
6,311

586

7,298

748

610

8,022

8,632

1,564

7,068

1985
2012
27 years
340 East Town Medical Office Building
Columbus
OH
5,862

10

9,443

627

10

10,070

10,080

1,691

8,389

1984
2012
29 years
393 East Town Medical Office Building
Columbus
OH
3,288

61

4,760

218

61

4,978

5,039

1,033

4,006

1970
2012
20 years
141 South Sixth Medical Office Building
Columbus
OH
1,544

80

1,113

4

80

1,117

1,197

376

821

1971
2012
14 years
Doctors West Medical Office Building
Columbus
OH
4,705

414

5,362

568

414

5,930

6,344

1,046

5,298

1998
2012
35 years
Eastside Health Center
Columbus
OH
4,399

956

3,472

(2
)
956

3,470

4,426

1,112

3,314

1977
2012
15 years
East Main Medical Office Building
Columbus
OH
5,226

440

4,771

58

440

4,829

5,269

784

4,485

2006
2012
35 years

179


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Heart Center Medical Office Building
Columbus
OH

1,063

12,140

157

1,063

12,297

13,360

2,144

11,216

2004
2012
35 years
Wilkins Medical Office Building
Columbus
OH

123

18,062

226

123

18,288

18,411

2,489

15,922

2002
2012
35 years
Grady Medical Office Building
Delaware
OH
1,824

239

2,263

306

239

2,569

2,808

611

2,197

1991
2012
25 years
Dublin Northwest Medical Office Building
Dublin
OH
3,118

342

3,278

215

342

3,493

3,835

672

3,163

2001
2012
34 years
Preserve III Medical Office Building
Dublin
OH
9,684

2,449

7,025

(66
)
2,449

6,959

9,408

1,297

8,111

2006
2012
35 years
Zanesville Surgery Center
Zanesville
OH

172

9,403


172

9,403

9,575

1,472

8,103

2000
2011
35 years
Dialysis Center
Zanesville
OH

534

855

71

534

926

1,460

371

1,089

1960
2011
21 years
Genesis Children's Center
Zanesville
OH

538

3,781


538

3,781

4,319

820

3,499

2006
2011
30 years
Medical Arts Building I
Zanesville
OH

429

2,405

455

436

2,853

3,289

782

2,507

1970
2011
20 years
Medical Arts Building II
Zanesville
OH

485

6,013

340

490

6,348

6,838

1,987

4,851

1995
2011
25 years
Medical Arts Building III
Zanesville
OH

94

1,248


94

1,248

1,342

371

971

1970
2011
25 years
Primecare Building
Zanesville
OH

130

1,344

648

130

1,992

2,122

475

1,647

1978
2011
20 years
Outpatient Rehabilitation Building
Zanesville
OH

82

1,541


82

1,541

1,623

361

1,262

1985
2011
28 years
Radiation Oncology Building
Zanesville
OH

105

1,201


105

1,201

1,306

331

975

1988
2011
25 years
Healthplex
Zanesville
OH

2,488

15,849

540

2,488

16,389

18,877

3,599

15,278

1990
2011
32 years
Physicians Pavilion
Zanesville
OH

422

6,297

1,123

422

7,420

7,842

1,806

6,036

1990
2011
25 years
Zanesville Northside Pharmacy
Zanesville
OH

42

635


42

635

677

154

523

1985
2011
28 years
Bethesda Campus MOB III
Zanesville
OH

188

1,137

128

199

1,254

1,453

321

1,132

1978
2011
25 years
Tuality 7th Avenue Medical Plaza
Hillsboro
OR
18,594

1,516

24,638

429

1,533

25,050

26,583

4,661

21,922

2003
2011
35 years
Professional Office Building I
Chester
PA


6,283

1,335


7,618

7,618

3,420

4,198

1978
2004
30 years
DCMH Medical Office Building
Drexel Hill
PA


10,424

1,501


11,925

11,925

5,326

6,599

1984
2004
30 years
Pinnacle Health
Harrisburg
PA

2,574

16,767


2,574

16,767

19,341

645

18,696

2002
2015
35 years
Penn State University Outpatient Center
Hershey
PA
57,415


55,439



55,439

55,439

10,717

44,722

2008
2010
35 years
Lancaster Rehabilitation Hospital
Lancaster
PA

959

16,610

(16
)
959

16,594

17,553

2,488

15,065

2007
2012
35 years
Lancaster ASC MOB
Lancaster
PA
9,037

593

17,117

25

593

17,142

17,735

2,902

14,833

2007
2012
35 years
St. Joseph Medical Office Building
Reading
PA


10,823

811


11,634

11,634

2,644

8,990

2006
2010
35 years
Crozer - Keystone MOB I
Springfield
PA

9,130

47,078


9,130

47,078

56,208

1,967

54,241

1996
2015
35 years
Crozer-Keystone MOB II
Springfield
PA

5,178

6,523


5,178

6,523

11,701

290

11,411

1998
2015
25 years
Doylestown Health & Wellness Center
Warrington
PA

4,452

17,383

351

4,497

17,689

22,186

3,311

18,875

2001
2012
34 years
Roper Medical Office Building
Charleston
SC
8,360

127

14,737

2,055

127

16,792

16,919

3,191

13,728

1990
2012
28 years
St. Francis Medical Plaza (Charleston)
Charleston
SC

447

3,946

332

447

4,278

4,725

933

3,792

2003
2012
35 years
Providence MOB I
Columbia
SC

225

4,274

200

225

4,474

4,699

1,432

3,267

1979
2012
18 years

180


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Providence MOB II
Columbia
SC

122

1,834

36

122

1,870

1,992

620

1,372

1985
2012
18 years
Providence MOB III
Columbia
SC

766

4,406

290

766

4,696

5,462

1,135

4,327

1990
2012
23 years
One Medical Park
Columbia
SC

210

7,939

488

214

8,423

8,637

2,244

6,393

1984
2012
19 years
Three Medical Park
Columbia
SC

40

10,650

573

40

11,223

11,263

2,548

8,715

1988
2012
25 years
St. Francis Millennium Medical Office Building
Greenville
SC
15,062


13,062

10,514

30

23,546

23,576

7,346

16,230

2009
2009
35 years
200 Andrews
Greenville
SC

789

2,014

161

789

2,175

2,964

824

2,140

1994
2012
29 years
St. Francis CMOB
Greenville
SC

501

7,661

570

501

8,231

8,732

1,333

7,399

2001
2012
35 years
St. Francis Outpatient Surgery Center
Greenville
SC

1,007

16,538

38

1,007

16,576

17,583

2,847

14,736

2001
2012
35 years
St. Francis Professional Medical Center
Greenville
SC

342

6,337

507

360

6,826

7,186

1,411

5,775

1984
2012
24 years
St. Francis Women's
Greenville
SC

322

4,877

106

322

4,983

5,305

1,447

3,858

1991
2012
24 years
St. Francis Medical Plaza (Greenville)
Greenville
SC

88

5,876

66

88

5,942

6,030

1,317

4,713

1998
2012
24 years
Irmo Professional MOB
Irmo
SC

1,726

5,414

134

1,726

5,548

7,274

1,361

5,913

2004
2011
35 years
River Hills Medical Plaza
Little River
SC

1,406

1,813

30

1,406

1,843

3,249

510

2,739

1999
2012
27 years
Mount Pleasant Medical Office Longpoint
Mount Pleasant
SC

670

4,455

91

670

4,546

5,216

1,414

3,802

2001
2012
34 years
Mary Black Westside Medical Office Bldg
Spartanburg
SC

291

5,057

94

291

5,151

5,442

1,127

4,315

1991
2012
31 years
Spartanburg ASC
Spartanburg
SC

1,333

15,756


1,333

15,756

17,089

478

16,611

2002
2015
35 years
Spartanburg Regional MOB
Spartanburg
SC

207

17,963


207

17,963

18,170

616

17,554

1986
2015
35 years
Wellmont Blue Ridge MOB
Bristol
TN

999

5,027


999

5,027

6,026

197

5,829

2001
2015
35 years
Health Park Medical Office Building
Chattanooga
TN
6,277

2,305

8,949

33

2,305

8,982

11,287

1,508

9,779

2004
2012
35 years
Peerless Crossing Medical Center
Cleveland
TN
6,643

1,217

6,464

7

1,217

6,471

7,688

1,026

6,662

2006
2012
35 years
St. Mary's Clinton Professional Office Building
Clinton
TN

298

618


298

618

916

11

905

1988
2015
39 years
St. Mary's Farragut MOB
Farragut
TN

221

2,719


221

2,719

2,940

29

2,911

1997
2015
39 years
Medical Center Physicians Tower
Jackson
TN
13,246

549

27,074

(7
)
549

27,067

27,616

4,395

23,221

2010
2012
35 years
St. Mary's Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Center East
Jefferson City
TN

120

160


120

160

280

6

274

1985
2015
39 years
St. Mary's Physician Professional Office Building
Knoxville
TN

138

3,144


138

3,144

3,282

41

3,241

1981
2015
39 years
St. Mary's Magdalene Clarke Tower
Knoxville
TN

69

4,153


69

4,153

4,222

48

4,174

1972
2015
39 years
St. Mary's Medical Office Building
Knoxville
TN

136

359


136

359

495

10

485

1976
2015
39 years
St. Mary's Ambulatory Surgery Center
Knoxville
TN

129

1,012


129

1,012

1,141

17

1,124

1999
2015
24 years
Texas Clinic at Arlington
Arlington
TX

2,781

24,515


2,781

24,515

27,296

846

26,450

2010
2015
35 years
Seton Medical Park Tower
Austin
TX

805

41,527

1,391

805

42,918

43,723

5,519

38,204

1968
2012
35 years

181


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Seton Northwest Health Plaza
Austin
TX

444

22,632

1,451

444

24,083

24,527

3,354

21,173

1988
2012
35 years
Seton Southwest Health Plaza
Austin
TX

294

5,311

85

294

5,396

5,690

727

4,963

2004
2012
35 years
Seton Southwest Health Plaza II
Austin
TX

447

10,154

20

447

10,174

10,621

1,338

9,283

2009
2012
35 years
BioLife Sciences Building
Denton
TX

1,036

6,576


1,036

6,576

7,612

257

7,355

2010
2015
35 years
East Houston MOB, LLC
Houston
TX

356

2,877

308

328

3,213

3,541

1,356

2,185

1982
2011
15 years
East Houston Medical Plaza
Houston
TX

671

426

434

671

860

1,531

531

1,000

1982
2011
11 years
Memorial Hermann
Houston
TX

822

14,307


822

14,307

15,129

456

14,673

2012
2015
35 years
Scott & White Healthcare
Kingsland
TX

534

5,104


534

5,104

5,638

186

5,452

2012
2015
35 years
Odessa Regional MOB
Odessa
TX

121

8,935


121

8,935

9,056

296

8,760

2008
2015
35 years
Legacy Heart Center
Plano
TX

3,081

8,890


3,081

8,890

11,971

353

11,618

2005
2015
35 years
Seton Williamson Medical Plaza
Round Rock
TX


15,074

443


15,517

15,517

3,741

11,776

2008
2010
35 years
Sunnyvale Medical Plaza
Sunnyvale
TX

1,186

15,397


1,186

15,397

16,583

586

15,997

2009
2015
35 years
Texarkana ASC
Texarkana
TX

814

5,903


814

5,903

6,717

247

6,470

1994
2015
30 years
Spring Creek Medical Plaza
Tomball
TX

2,165

8,212


2,165

8,212

10,377

288

10,089

2006
2015
35 years
251 Medical Center
Webster
TX

1,158

12,078

182

1,158

12,260

13,418

1,780

11,638

2006
2011
35 years
253 Medical Center
Webster
TX

1,181

11,862


1,181

11,862

13,043

1,673

11,370

2009
2011
35 years
MRMC MOB I
Mechanicsville
VA

1,669

7,024

356

1,669

7,380

9,049

1,870

7,179

1993
2012
31 years
Henrico MOB
Richmond
VA

968

6,189

355

968

6,544

7,512

1,809

5,703

1976
2011
25 years
St. Mary's MOB North (Floors 6 & 7)
Richmond
VA

227

2,961

256

227

3,217

3,444

853

2,591

1968
2012
22 years
Virginia Urology Center
Richmond
VA

3,822

16,127


3,822

16,127

19,949

597

19,352

2004
2015
35 years
St. Francis Cancer Center
Richmond
VA

654

18,331


654

18,331

18,985

633

18,352

2006
2015
35 years
Bonney Lake Medical Office Building
Bonney Lake
WA
10,712

5,176

14,375

161

5,176

14,536

19,712

2,478

17,234

2011
2012
35 years
Good Samaritan Medical Office Building
Puyallup
WA
14,058

781

30,368

87

781

30,455

31,236

4,210

27,026

2011
2012
35 years
Holy Family Hospital Central MOB
Spokane
WA


19,085

230


19,315

19,315

1,890

17,425

2007
2012
35 years
Physician's Pavilion
Vancouver
WA

1,411

32,939

304

1,424

33,230

34,654

6,226

28,428

2001
2011
35 years
Administration Building
Vancouver
WA

296

7,856


296

7,856

8,152

1,401

6,751

1972
2011
35 years
Medical Center Physician's Building
Vancouver
WA

1,225

31,246

1,911

1,246

33,136

34,382

5,502

28,880

1980
2011
35 years
Memorial MOB
Vancouver
WA

663

12,626

315

690

12,914

13,604

2,276

11,328

1999
2011
35 years
Salmon Creek MOB
Vancouver
WA

1,325

9,238


1,325

9,238

10,563

1,629

8,934

1994
2011
35 years
Fisher's Landing MOB
Vancouver
WA

1,590

5,420


1,590

5,420

7,010

1,152

5,858

1995
2011
34 years
Columbia Medical Plaza
Vancouver
WA

281

5,266

208

331

5,424

5,755

1,009

4,746

1991
2011
35 years
Appleton Heart Institute
Appleton
WI


7,775

36


7,811

7,811

1,677

6,134

2003
2010
39 years
Appleton Medical Offices West
Appleton
WI


5,756

60


5,816

5,816

1,250

4,566

1989
2010
39 years
Appleton Medical Offices South
Appleton
WI


9,058

181


9,239

9,239

2,043

7,196

1983
2010
39 years

182


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Brookfield Clinic
Brookfield
WI

2,638

4,093


2,638

4,093

6,731

896

5,835

1999
2011
35 years
Lakeshore Medical Clinic - Franklin
Franklin
WI

1,973

7,579


1,973

7,579

9,552

296

9,256

2008
2015
34 years
Lakeshore Medical Clinic - Greenfield
Greenfield
WI

1,223

13,387


1,223

13,387

14,610

431

14,179

2010
2015
35 years
Aurora Health Care - Hartford
Hartford
WI
19,120

3,706

22,019


3,706

22,019

25,725

800

24,925

2006
2015
35 years
Hartland Clinic
Hartland
WI

321

5,050


321

5,050

5,371

942

4,429

1994
2011
35 years
Aurora Healthcare - Kenosha
Kenosha
WI

7,546

19,155


7,546

19,155

26,701

711

25,990

2014
2015
35 years
Univ of Wisconsin Health
Monona
WI
5,039

678

8,017


678

8,017

8,695

318

8,377

2011
2015
35 years
Theda Clark Medical Center Office Pavilion
Neenah
WI


7,080

241


7,321

7,321

1,525

5,796

1993
2010
39 years
Aylward Medical Building Condo Floors 3 & 4
Neenah
WI


4,462

7


4,469

4,469

1,006

3,463

2006
2010
39 years
Aurora Health Care - Neenah
Neenah
WI
7,840

2,033

9,072


2,033

9,072

11,105

354

10,751

2006
2015
35 years
New Berlin Clinic
New Berlin
WI

678

7,121


678

7,121

7,799

1,428

6,371

1999
2011
35 years
United Healthcare - Onalaska
Onalaska
WI

4,623

5,527


4,623

5,527

10,150

280

9,870

1995
2015
35 years
WestWood Health & Fitness
Pewaukee
WI

823

11,649


823

11,649

12,472

2,356

10,116

1997
2011
35 years
Aurora Health Care - Two Rivers
Two Rivers
WI
22,640

5,638

25,308


5,638

25,308

30,946

927

30,019

2006
2015
35 years
Watertown Clinic
Watertown
WI

166

3,234


166

3,234

3,400

582

2,818

2003
2011
35 years
Southside Clinic
Waukesha
WI

218

5,273


218

5,273

5,491

962

4,529

1997
2011
35 years
Rehabilitation Hospital
Waukesha
WI

372

15,636


372

15,636

16,008

2,498

13,510

2008
2011
35 years
United Healthcare - Wauwatosa
Wawatosa
WI

8,012

15,992


8,012

15,992

24,004

718

23,286

1995
2015
35 years
BSG CS, LLC
Waunakee
WI

1,060



1,060


1,060


1,060

N/A
2012
N/A
TOTAL FOR MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS
 
 
624,254

395,733

4,132,212

148,775

396,841

4,279,879

4,676,720

632,349

4,044,371

 
 
 
TOTAL FOR ALL PROPERTIES
 
 
$
1,987,400

$
2,064,997

$
19,938,231

$
454,804

$
2,056,428

$
20,401,604

$
22,458,032

$
3,544,625

$
18,913,407

 
 
 


183


VENTAS, INC.
SCHEDULE IV
REAL ESTATE MORTGAGE LOANS
December 31, 2015
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Location
Number of RE Assets
Interest Rate
Fixed / Variable
Maturity Date
Monthly Debt Service
Face Value
Net Book Value
Prior Liens
 
 
First Mortgages
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Washington
1
8.00%
F
8/1/2020
167

25,000

24,826


 
Washington
1
6.00%
F
7/5/2017
44

6,187

6,108


 
California
11
9.42%
F
12/31/2017
1,624

176,719

173,451


 
Multiple
3
9.21%
V
6/30/2019
131

17,023

17,023


 
Ohio
5
7.89%
V
10/1/2021
516

78,448

78,448


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Second Mortgages
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Multiple
9
11.25%
V
10/23/2019
48

5,000

4,965

*
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mezzanine Loans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Virginia
1
10.00%
F
12/10/2019
86

10,044

10,044


 
Multiple**
214
8.19%
F/V
12/9/2016
2,963

419,964

419,964

2,184,601

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Construction Loans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Colorado
1
8.75%
V
2/6/2021
330

46,436

45,680


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
* The Second Mortgage loan is a $5 million participation in a second lien term loan with an aggregate commitment of $215 million
** The variable portion of this investment has a maturity date of 12/9/2016, with extension options to 12/9/2019.
 
Mortgage Loan Reconciliation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2015
2014
2013
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)

 
Beginning Balance
 
$
747,456

$
335,656

$
622,139

 
 
Additions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
New Loans
 
88,648

451,269

3,500

 
 
Construction Draws
 
53,708


694

 
 
Total additions
 
 
142,356

451,269

4,194

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deductions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Principal Repayments
(99,467
)
(21,159
)
(75,738
)
 
 
Conversions to Real Property

(18,310
)

 
 
Sales and Syndications
 
(5,524
)

(214,939
)
 
 
Total deductions
(104,991
)
(39,469
)
(290,677
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ending Balance
 
$
784,821

$
747,456

$
335,656

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


184


ITEM 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
ITEM 9A.    Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2015. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective as of December 31, 2015, at the reasonable assurance level.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The information set forth under “Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” and “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference into this Item 9A.
Internal Control Changes
During the fourth quarter of 2015, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B.    Other Information
Not applicable.
PART III
ITEM 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by this Item 10 is incorporated by reference to the material under the headings “Proposals Requiring Your Vote—Proposal 1: Election of Directors,” “Our Executive Officers,” “Securities Ownership—Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Corporate Governance—Governance Policies” and “Audit and Compliance Committee” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC not later than April 30, 2016.
ITEM 11.    Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated by reference to the material under the headings “Executive Compensation,” “Non-Employee Director Compensation” and “Executive Compensation Committee” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC not later than April 30, 2016.
ITEM 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this Item 12 is incorporated by reference to the material under the headings “Equity Compensation Plan Information” and “Securities Ownership” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC not later than April 30, 2016.
ITEM 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this Item 13 is incorporated by reference to the material under the headings “Corporate Governance—Transactions with Related Persons,” “Our Board of Directors—Director Independence,” “Audit and Compliance Committee,” “Executive Compensation Committee” and “Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC not later than April 30, 2016.

185


ITEM 14.    Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated by reference to the material under the heading “Proposals Requiring Your Vote—Proposal 2: Ratification of the Selection of KPMG LLP as Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal Year 2016” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC not later than April 30, 2016.


186


PART IV
ITEM 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
The following documents have been included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
 
Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules
 
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
Schedule IV — Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
All other schedules have been omitted because they are inapplicable, not required or the information is included elsewhere in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.

187


Exhibits

Exhibit
Number
 
Description of Document
 
Location of Document
2.1
 
Separation and Distribution Agreement dated as of August 17, 2015 by and between Ventas, Inc. and Care Capital Properties, Inc.
 
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 21, 2015.
 
 
 
 
 
3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, of Ventas, Inc.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011.


 

 
3.2

Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended, of Ventas, Inc.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011.


 

 
4.1

Specimen common stock certificate.

Filed herewith.





4.2

Indenture dated as of September 19, 2006 by and among Ventas, Inc., Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuer(s), the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to our Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed on April 7, 2006, File No. 333-133115.





4.3

Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 17, 2011 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.750% Senior Notes due 2021.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 20, 2011.





4.4

Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 10, 2012 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.250% Senior Notes due 2022.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 14, 2012.





4.5

Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 17, 2012 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.000% Senior Notes due 2019.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 18, 2012.





4.6

Seventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 3, 2012 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.250% Senior Notes due 2022.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.





4.7

Eighth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 13, 2012 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 2.000% Senior Notes due 2018.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 13, 2012.





4.8

Ninth Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 7, 2013 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 5.450% Senior Notes due 2043.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Registration Statement on Form 8-A, filed on March 7, 2013.






188


Exhibit
Number
 
Description of Document
 
Location of Document
4.9

Tenth Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 19, 2013 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 2.700% Senior Notes due 2020.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 19, 2013.





4.10

Indenture dated as of September 26, 2013 by and among Ventas, Inc., Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to our Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed on April 2, 2012, File No. 333-180521.





4.11

First Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 26, 2013 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 1.550% Senior Notes due 2016.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 26, 2013.





4.12

Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 26, 2013 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 5.700% Senior Notes due 2043.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 26, 2013.





4.13

Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 17, 2014 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 1.250% Senior Notes due 2017.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 17, 2014.





4.14

Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 17, 2014 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.750% Senior Notes due 2024.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 17, 2014.





4.15

Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 14, 2015 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.500% Senior Notes due 2025.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 14, 2015.





4.16

Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 14, 2015 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.375% Senior Notes due 2045.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 14, 2015.





4.17

Indenture dated as of August 19, 1997 by and between Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as Trustee.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed on July 25, 1997, File No. 333-32135.





4.18

Indenture dated as of January 13, 1999 by and between Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. and Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed on January 15, 1999, File No. 333-70707.





4.19

First Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 18, 2005 by and between Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. and J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 11, 2005, File No. 001-09028.






189


Exhibit
Number
 
Description of Document
 
Location of Document
4.20

Indenture dated as September 24, 2014 by and among Ventas, Inc., Ventas Canadian Finance Limited, the Guarantors parties thereto from time to time and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014.





4.21

First Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 24, 2014 by and among Ventas Canada Finance Limited, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee, relating to the 3.00% Senior Notes, Series A due 2019.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014.





4.22

Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 24, 2014 by and among Ventas Canada Finance Limited, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee, relating to the 4.125% Senior Notes, Series B due 2024.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014.





4.23

Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 13, 2015 by and among Ventas Canada Finance Limited, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee, relating to the 3.30% Senior Notes, Series C due 2022.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.24 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.





4.24
 
Indenture dated as of July 16, 2015 by and among Ventas, Inc., Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein as Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee.
 
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 16, 2015.
 
 
 
 
 
4.25
 
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 16, 2015 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.125% Senior Notes due 2026.
 
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 16, 2015.
 
 
 
 
 
10.1

First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to our Registration Statement on Form S-4, as amended, filed on June 19, 2002, File No. 333-89312.






10.2

Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of December 9, 2013, among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, Ventas SSL Ontario II, Inc. and Ventas SSL Ontario III, Inc., as Borrowers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, the Lenders identified therein, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender, L/C Issuer and Alternative Currency Fronting Lender.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 9, 2013.





10.3
 
First Amendment dated as of July 28, 2015 to that certain Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, Ventas SSL Ontario II, Inc. and Ventas SSL Ontario III, Inc., as Borrowers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, the Lenders identified therein, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender, L/C Issuer and Alternative Currency Fronting Lender.
 
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 31, 2015.
 
 
 
 
 

190


Exhibit
Number
 
Description of Document
 
Location of Document
10.4
 
Second Amendment and Joinder dated as of October 14, 2015 to that certain Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, Ventas Canada Finance Limited, Ventas UK Finance, Inc., Ventas Euro Finance, LLC, Ventas SSL Ontario II, Inc. and Ventas SSL Ontario III, Inc., as Borrowers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, the Lenders identified therein, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender L/C Issuer and Alternative Currency Fronting Lender.
 
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 19, 2015.
 
 
 
 
 
10.5
 
Transition Services Agreement dated as of August 17, 2015 by and between Ventas, Inc. and Care Capital Properties, Inc.
 
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 21, 2015.
 
 
 
 
 
10.6
 
Tax Matters Agreement dated as of August 17, 2015 by and between Ventas, Inc. and Care Capital Properties, Inc.
 
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 21, 2015.
 
 
 
 
 
10.7
 
Employee Matters Agreement dated as of August 17, 2015 by and between Ventas, Inc. and Care Capital Properties, Inc.
 
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 21, 2015.
 
 
 
 
 
10.8*

Ventas, Inc. 2004 Stock Plan for Directors, as amended.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.





10.9.1*

Ventas, Inc. 2006 Incentive Plan, as amended.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.





10.9.2*

Form of Stock Option Agreement—2006 Incentive Plan.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.


 

 
10.9.3*

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement—2006 Incentive Plan.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15.3 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.





10.10.1*

Ventas, Inc. 2006 Stock Plan for Directors, as amended.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012.


 

 
10.10.2*

Form of Stock Option Agreement—2006 Stock Plan for Directors.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.





10.10.3*

Form of Amendment to Stock Option Agreement—2006 Stock Plan for Directors.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012.





10.10.4*

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement—2006 Stock Plan for Directors.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11.4 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.





10.11.1*

Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 23, 2012.





10.11.2*

Form of Stock Option Agreement (Employees) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.





10.11.3*

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (Employees) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6.3 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.





10.11.4*

Form of Stock Option Agreement (Directors) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Registration Form on S-8, filed on August 7, 2012, File No. 333-183121.






191


Exhibit
Number
 
Description of Document
 
Location of Document
10.11.5*

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (Directors) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Registration Form on S-8, filed on August 7, 2012, File No. 333-183121.





10.11.6*

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Directors) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Registration Form on S-8, filed on August 7, 2012, File No. 333-183121.





10.12.1*

Ventas Executive Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, as amended.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.





10.12.2*

Deferral Election Form under the Ventas Executive Deferred Stock Compensation Plan.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 
 

 
10.13.1*

Ventas Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, as amended.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.





10.13.2*

Deferral Election Form under the Ventas Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K fir the year ended December 31, 2008.

 
 

 
10.14.1*

Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. 2005 Performance Incentive Plan.

Incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. definitive Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting, filed on March 24, 2005, File No. 001-09028.





10.14.2*

First Amendment to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. 2005 Performance Incentive Plan, dated October 28, 2008.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 3, 2008, File No. 001-09028.

 
 

 
10.15.1*

Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Retirement Plan for Directors, as amended and restated on April 20, 2006.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, File No. 001-09028.

 
 

 
10.15.2*

Amendment to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Retirement Plan for Directors, as amended and restated on April 20, 2006.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 3, 2008, File No. 001-09028.

 
 

 
10.16*

Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of March 22, 2011 between Ventas, Inc. and Debra A. Cafaro.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 24, 2011.

 
 

 
10.17.1*

Employment Agreement dated as of July 31, 1998 between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15.2.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

 
 

 
10.17.2*

Amendment dated as of September 30, 1999 to Employment Agreement between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15.2.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.





10.17.3*

Amendment dated as of March 19, 2007 to Employment Agreement between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 23, 2007.





10.17.4*

Amendment dated as of December 31, 2008 to Employment Agreement between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15.4 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.





10.17.5*

Amended and Restated Change-in-Control Severance Agreement dated as of March 22, 2011 between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 24, 2011.

 
 

 
10.18*

Consulting Agreement dated December 31, 2014 between Ventas, Inc. and Richard A. Schweinhart.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 7, 2015.






192


Exhibit
Number
 
Description of Document
 
Location of Document
10.19.1*

Employment Agreement dated as of September 18, 2002 between Ventas, Inc. and Raymond J. Lewis.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.

 
 

 
10.19.2*

Amendment dated as of March 19, 2007 to Employment Agreement between Ventas, Inc. and Raymond J. Lewis.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 23, 2007.

 
 

 
10.19.3*

Amendment dated as of December 31, 2008 to Employment Agreement between Ventas, Inc. and Raymond J. Lewis.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17.3 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.





10.20*

Employment Agreement dated as of June 22, 2010 between Ventas, Inc. and Todd W. Lillibridge.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.

 
 

 
10.21*

Employee Protection and Noncompetition Agreement dated as of October 21, 2013 between Ventas, Inc. and John D. Cobb.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.





10.22.1*

Offer Letter dated September 16, 2014 from Ventas, Inc. to Robert F. Probst.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 29, 2014.





10.22.2*
 
Employee Protection and Noncompetition Agreement dated September 16, 2014 between Ventas, Inc. and Robert F. Probst.
 
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 29, 2014.
 
 
 
 
 
10.23*
 
Employee Protection and Noncompetition Agreement dated June 17, 2015 between Ventas, Inc. and Todd W. Lillibridge.
 
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 23, 2015.
 
 
 
 
 
10.24*

Ventas Employee and Director Stock Purchase Plan, as amended.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 
 

 
12
 
Statement Regarding Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

Filed herewith.





21

Subsidiaries of Ventas, Inc.

Filed herewith.


 

 
23

Consent of KPMG LLP.

Filed herewith.





31.1

Certification of Debra A. Cafaro, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act.

Filed herewith.





31.2

Certification of Robert F. Probst, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act.

Filed herewith.





32.1

Certification of Debra A. Cafaro, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. 1350.

Filed herewith.





32.2

Certification of Robert F. Probst, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. 1350.

Filed herewith.





101

Interactive Data File.

Filed herewith.
________________________
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(b) of Form 10-K.

193


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 12, 2016

 
 
VENTAS, INC.
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ DEBRA A. CAFARO
 
 
 
Debra A. Cafaro
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


194


Signature
Title
Date
 
 
 
/s/ DEBRA A. CAFARO
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
February 12, 2016
Debra A. Cafaro
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ ROBERT F. PROBST
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
February 12, 2016
Robert F. Probst
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ GREGORY R. LIEBBE
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
February 12, 2016
Gregory R. Liebbe
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ MELODY C. BARNES
Director
February 12, 2016
Melody C. Barnes
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ DOUGLAS CROCKER II
Director
February 12, 2016
Douglas Crocker II
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ JAY M. GELLERT
Director
February 12, 2016
Jay M. Gellert
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ RICHARD I. GILCHRIST
Director
February 12, 2016
Richard I. Gilchrist
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ MATTHEW J. LUSTIG
Director
February 12, 2016
Matthew J. Lustig
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ DOUGLAS M. PASQUALE
Director
February 12, 2016
Douglas M. Pasquale
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ ROBERT D. REED
Director
February 12, 2016
Robert D. Reed
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ GLENN J. RUFRANO
Director
February 12, 2016
Glenn J. Rufrano
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ JAMES D. SHELTON
Director
February 12, 2016
James D. Shelton
 
 
 
 
 



195


EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
Number
 
Description of Document
 
Location of Document
2.1
 
Separation and Distribution Agreement dated as of August 17, 2015 by and between Ventas, Inc. and Care Capital Properties, Inc.
 
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 21, 2015.
 
 
 
 
 
3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, of Ventas, Inc.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011.


 

 
3.2

Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended, of Ventas, Inc.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011.


 

 
4.1

Specimen common stock certificate.

Filed herewith.





4.2

Indenture dated as of September 19, 2006 by and among Ventas, Inc., Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuer(s), the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to our Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed on April 7, 2006, File No. 333-133115.





4.3

Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 17, 2011 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.750% Senior Notes due 2021.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 20, 2011.





4.4

Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 10, 2012 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.250% Senior Notes due 2022.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 14, 2012.





4.5

Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 17, 2012 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.000% Senior Notes due 2019.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 18, 2012.





4.6

Seventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 3, 2012 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.250% Senior Notes due 2022.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.





4.7

Eighth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 13, 2012 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 2.000% Senior Notes due 2018.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 13, 2012.





4.8

Ninth Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 7, 2013 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 5.450% Senior Notes due 2043.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Registration Statement on Form 8-A, filed on March 7, 2013.






196


Exhibit
Number
 
Description of Document
 
Location of Document
4.9

Tenth Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 19, 2013 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 2.700% Senior Notes due 2020.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 19, 2013.





4.10

Indenture dated as of September 26, 2013 by and among Ventas, Inc., Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to our Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed on April 2, 2012, File No. 333-180521.





4.11

First Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 26, 2013 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 1.550% Senior Notes due 2016.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 26, 2013.





4.12

Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 26, 2013 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 5.700% Senior Notes due 2043.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 26, 2013.





4.13

Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 17, 2014 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 1.250% Senior Notes due 2017.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 17, 2014.





4.14

Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 17, 2014 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.750% Senior Notes due 2024.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 17, 2014.





4.15

Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 14, 2015 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.500% Senior Notes due 2025.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 14, 2015.





4.16

Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 14, 2015 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.375% Senior Notes due 2045.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 14, 2015.





4.17

Indenture dated as of August 19, 1997 by and between Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as Trustee.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed on July 25, 1997, File No. 333-32135.





4.18

Indenture dated as of January 13, 1999 by and between Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. and Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed on January 15, 1999, File No. 333-70707.





4.19

First Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 18, 2005 by and between Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. and J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 11, 2005, File No. 001-09028.






197


Exhibit
Number
 
Description of Document
 
Location of Document
4.20

Indenture dated as September 24, 2014 by and among Ventas, Inc., Ventas Canadian Finance Limited, the Guarantors parties thereto from time to time and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014.





4.21

First Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 24, 2014 by and among Ventas Canada Finance Limited, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee, relating to the 3.00% Senior Notes, Series A due 2019.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014.





4.22

Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 24, 2014 by and among Ventas Canada Finance Limited, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee, relating to the 4.125% Senior Notes, Series B due 2024.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014.





4.23

Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 13, 2015 by and among Ventas Canada Finance Limited, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee, relating to the 3.30% Senior Notes, Series C due 2022.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.24 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.





4.24
 
Indenture dated as of July 16, 2015 by and among Ventas, Inc., Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein as Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee.
 
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 16, 2015.
 
 
 
 
 
4.25
 
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 16, 2015 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.125% Senior Notes due 2026.
 
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 16, 2015.
 
 
 
 
 
10.1

First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to our Registration Statement on Form S-4, as amended, filed on June 19, 2002, File No. 333-89312.





10.2

Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of December 9, 2013, among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, Ventas SSL Ontario II, Inc. and Ventas SSL Ontario III, Inc., as Borrowers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, the Lenders identified therein, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender, L/C Issuer and Alternative Currency Fronting Lender.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 9, 2013.





10.4
 
Second Amendment and Joinder dated as of October 14, 2015 to that certain Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, Ventas Canada Finance Limited, Ventas UK Finance, Inc., Ventas Euro Finance, LLC, Ventas SSL Ontario II, Inc. and Ventas SSL Ontario III, Inc., as Borrowers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, the Lenders identified therein, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender L/C Issuer and Alternative Currency Fronting Lender.
 
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 19, 2015.
 
 
 
 
 
10.5
 
Transition Services Agreement dated as of August 17, 2015 by and between Ventas, Inc. and Care Capital Properties, Inc.
 
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 21, 2015.

198


Exhibit
Number
 
Description of Document
 
Location of Document
 
 
 
 
 
10.6
 
Tax Matters Agreement dated as of August 17, 2015 by and between Ventas, Inc. and Care Capital Properties, Inc.
 
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 21, 2015.
 
 
 
 
 
10.7
 
Employee Matters Agreement dated as of August 17, 2015 by and between Ventas, Inc. and Care Capital Properties, Inc.
 
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 21, 2015.
 
 
 
 
 
10.8*

Ventas, Inc. 2004 Stock Plan for Directors, as amended.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.





10.9.1*

Ventas, Inc. 2006 Incentive Plan, as amended.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.





10.9.2*

Form of Stock Option Agreement—2006 Incentive Plan.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.


 

 
10.9.3*

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement—2006 Incentive Plan.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15.3 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.





10.10.1*

Ventas, Inc. 2006 Stock Plan for Directors, as amended.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012.


 

 
10.10.2*

Form of Stock Option Agreement—2006 Stock Plan for Directors.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.





10.10.3*

Form of Amendment to Stock Option Agreement—2006 Stock Plan for Directors.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012.





10.10.4*

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement—2006 Stock Plan for Directors.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11.4 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.





10.11.1*

Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 23, 2012.





10.11.2*

Form of Stock Option Agreement (Employees) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.





10.11.3*

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (Employees) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6.3 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.





10.11.4*

Form of Stock Option Agreement (Directors) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Registration Form on S-8, filed on August 7, 2012, File No. 333-183121.





10.11.5*

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (Directors) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Registration Form on S-8, filed on August 7, 2012, File No. 333-183121.





10.11.6*

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Directors) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Registration Form on S-8, filed on August 7, 2012, File No. 333-183121.






199


Exhibit
Number
 
Description of Document
 
Location of Document
10.12.1*

Ventas Executive Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, as amended.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.





10.12.2*

Deferral Election Form under the Ventas Executive Deferred Stock Compensation Plan.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 
 

 
10.13.1*

Ventas Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, as amended.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.





10.13.2*

Deferral Election Form under the Ventas Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K fir the year ended December 31, 2008.

 
 

 
10.14.1*

Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. 2005 Performance Incentive Plan.

Incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. definitive Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting, filed on March 24, 2005, File No. 001-09028.





10.14.2*

First Amendment to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. 2005 Performance Incentive Plan, dated October 28, 2008.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 3, 2008, File No. 001-09028.

 
 

 
10.15.1*

Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Retirement Plan for Directors, as amended and restated on April 20, 2006.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, File No. 001-09028.

 
 

 
10.15.2*

Amendment to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Retirement Plan for Directors, as amended and restated on April 20, 2006.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 3, 2008, File No. 001-09028.

 
 

 
10.16*

Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of March 22, 2011 between Ventas, Inc. and Debra A. Cafaro.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 24, 2011.

 
 

 
10.17.1*

Employment Agreement dated as of July 31, 1998 between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15.2.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

 
 

 
10.17.2*

Amendment dated as of September 30, 1999 to Employment Agreement between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15.2.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.





10.17.3*

Amendment dated as of March 19, 2007 to Employment Agreement between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 23, 2007.





10.17.4*

Amendment dated as of December 31, 2008 to Employment Agreement between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15.4 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.





10.17.5*

Amended and Restated Change-in-Control Severance Agreement dated as of March 22, 2011 between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 24, 2011.

 
 

 
10.18*

Consulting Agreement dated December 31, 2014 between Ventas, Inc. and Richard A. Schweinhart.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 7, 2015.





10.19.1*

Employment Agreement dated as of September 18, 2002 between Ventas, Inc. and Raymond J. Lewis.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.

 
 

 

200


Exhibit
Number
 
Description of Document
 
Location of Document
10.19.2*

Amendment dated as of March 19, 2007 to Employment Agreement between Ventas, Inc. and Raymond J. Lewis.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 23, 2007.

 
 

 
10.19.3*

Amendment dated as of December 31, 2008 to Employment Agreement between Ventas, Inc. and Raymond J. Lewis.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17.3 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.





10.20*

Employment Agreement dated as of June 22, 2010 between Ventas, Inc. and Todd W. Lillibridge.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.

 
 

 
10.21*

Employee Protection and Noncompetition Agreement dated as of October 21, 2013 between Ventas, Inc. and John D. Cobb.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.





10.22.1*

Offer Letter dated September 16, 2014 from Ventas, Inc. to Robert F. Probst.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 29, 2014.
 
 
 
 
 
10.22.2*
 
Employee Protection and Noncompetition Agreement dated September 16, 2014 between Ventas, Inc. and Robert F. Probst.
 
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 29, 2014.
 
 
 
 
 
10.23*
 
Employee Protection and Noncompetition Agreement dated June 17, 2015 between Ventas, Inc. and Todd W. Lillibridge.
 
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 23, 2015.
 
 
 
 
 
10.24*

Ventas Employee and Director Stock Purchase Plan, as amended.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 
 

 
12
 
Statement Regarding Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

Filed herewith.





21

Subsidiaries of Ventas, Inc.

Filed herewith.


 

 
23

Consent of KPMG LLP.

Filed herewith.





31.1

Certification of Debra A. Cafaro, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act.

Filed herewith.





31.2

Certification of Robert F. Probst, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act.

Filed herewith.





32.1

Certification of Debra A. Cafaro, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. 1350.

Filed herewith.





32.2

Certification of Robert F. Probst, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. 1350.

Filed herewith.





101

Interactive Data File.

Filed herewith.
________________________
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(b) of Form 10-K.


201