Document

 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
 
 
x
 
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017
OR
¨
 
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from            to          
Commission File Number 1-10989
 
VENTAS, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
 
61-1055020
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
353 N. Clark Street, Suite 3300, Chicago, Illinois
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 
60654
(Zip Code)
(877) 483-6827
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
 
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, par value $0.25 per share
 
New York Stock Exchange
         Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
 
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes x    No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x    No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x    No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment of this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act
Large accelerated filer x
 
Accelerated filer ¨
 
Non-accelerated filer ¨
 (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company ¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨    No x
The aggregate market value of shares of the Registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on June 30, 2017, based on a closing price of the common stock of $69.48 as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, was $18.8 billion.  For purposes of the foregoing calculation only, all directors, executive officers and 10% beneficial owners of the Registrant have been deemed affiliates.
As of January 31, 2018, there were 356,198,053 shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 15, 2018 are incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10 through 14 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 



CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS

Unless otherwise indicated or except where the context otherwise requires, the terms “we,” “us” and “our” and other similar terms in this Annual Report on Form 10-K refer to Ventas, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements regarding our or our tenants’, operators’, borrowers’ or managers’ expected future financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, funds from operations, dividends and dividend plans, financing opportunities and plans, capital markets transactions, business strategy, budgets, projected costs, operating metrics, capital expenditures, competitive positions, acquisitions, investment opportunities, dispositions, merger integration, growth opportunities, expected lease income, continued qualification as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”), plans and objectives of management for future operations, and statements that include words such as “anticipate,” “if,” “believe,” “plan,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “will,” and other similar expressions are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain, and actual results may differ from our expectations. We do not undertake a duty to update these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made.

Our actual future results and trends may differ materially from expectations depending on a variety of factors discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). These factors include without limitation:

The ability and willingness of our tenants, operators, borrowers, managers and other third parties to satisfy their obligations under their respective contractual arrangements with us, including, in some cases, their obligations to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless from and against various claims, litigation and liabilities;

The ability of our tenants, operators, borrowers and managers to maintain the financial strength and liquidity necessary to satisfy their respective obligations and liabilities to third parties, including without limitation obligations under their existing credit facilities and other indebtedness;

Our success in implementing our business strategy and our ability to identify, underwrite, finance, consummate and integrate diversifying acquisitions and investments;

Macroeconomic conditions such as a disruption of or lack of access to the capital markets, changes in the debt rating on U.S. government securities, default or delay in payment by the United States of its obligations, and changes in the federal or state budgets resulting in the reduction or nonpayment of Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement rates;

The nature and extent of future competition, including new construction in the markets in which our seniors housing communities and office buildings are located;

The extent and effect of future or pending healthcare reform and regulation, including cost containment measures and changes in reimbursement policies, procedures and rates;

Increases in our borrowing costs as a result of changes in interest rates and other factors;

The ability of our tenants, operators and managers, as applicable, to comply with laws, rules and regulations in the operation of our properties, to deliver high-quality services, to attract and retain qualified personnel and to attract residents and patients;

Changes in general economic conditions or economic conditions in the markets in which we may, from time to time, compete, and the effect of those changes on our revenues, earnings and funding sources;

Our ability to pay down, refinance, restructure or extend our indebtedness as it becomes due;

Our ability and willingness to maintain our qualification as a REIT in light of economic, market, legal, tax and other considerations;


i


Final determination of our taxable net income for the year ended December 31, 2017 and for the year ending December 31, 2018;

The ability and willingness of our tenants to renew their leases with us upon expiration of the leases, our ability to reposition our properties on the same or better terms in the event of nonrenewal or in the event we exercise our right to replace an existing tenant, and obligations, including indemnification obligations, we may incur in connection with the replacement of an existing tenant;

Risks associated with our senior living operating portfolio, such as factors that can cause volatility in our operating income and earnings generated by those properties, including without limitation national and regional economic conditions, development of new competing properties, costs of food, materials, energy, labor and services, employee benefit costs, insurance costs and professional and general liability claims, and the timely delivery of accurate property-level financial results for those properties;

Changes in exchange rates for any foreign currency in which we may, from time to time, conduct business;

Year-over-year changes in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) or the U.K. Retail Price Index and the effect of those changes on the rent escalators contained in our leases and on our earnings;

Our ability and the ability of our tenants, operators, borrowers and managers to obtain and maintain adequate property, liability and other insurance from reputable, financially stable providers;

The impact of increased operating costs and uninsured professional liability claims on our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations or that of our tenants, operators, borrowers and managers and our ability and the ability of our tenants, operators, borrowers and managers to accurately estimate the magnitude of those claims;

Risks associated with our office building portfolio and operations, including our ability to successfully design, develop and manage office buildings and to retain key personnel;

The ability of the hospitals on or near whose campuses our medical office buildings (“MOBs”) are located and their affiliated health systems to remain competitive and financially viable and to attract physicians and physician groups;

Risks associated with our investments in joint ventures and unconsolidated entities, including our lack of sole decision-making authority and our reliance on our joint venture partners’ financial condition;

Our ability to obtain the financial results expected from our development and redevelopment projects, including projects undertaken through our joint ventures;

The impact of market or issuer events on the liquidity or value of our investments in marketable securities;

Consolidation in the seniors housing and healthcare industries resulting in a change of control of, or a competitor’s investment in, one or more of our tenants, operators, borrowers or managers or significant changes in the senior management of our tenants, operators, borrowers or managers;

The impact of litigation or any financial, accounting, legal or regulatory issues that may affect us or our tenants, operators, borrowers or managers; and

Changes in accounting principles, or their application or interpretation, and our ability to make estimates and the assumptions underlying the estimates, which could have an effect on our earnings.

Many of these factors, some of which are described in greater detail under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, are beyond our control and the control of our management.

Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred, Atria, Sunrise and Ardent Information

Each of Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Brookdale Senior Living”) and Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Kindred”) is subject to the reporting requirements of the SEC and is required to

ii


file with the SEC annual reports containing audited financial information and quarterly reports containing unaudited financial information. The information related to Brookdale Senior Living and Kindred contained or referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been derived from SEC filings made by Brookdale Senior Living or Kindred, as the case may be, or other publicly available information or was provided to us by Brookdale Senior Living or Kindred, and we have not verified this information through an independent investigation or otherwise. We have no reason to believe that this information is inaccurate in any material respect, but we cannot assure you of its accuracy. We are providing this data for informational purposes only, and you are encouraged to obtain Brookdale Senior Living’s and Kindred’s publicly available filings, which can be found on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Atria Senior Living, Inc. (“Atria”), Sunrise Senior Living, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Sunrise”) and Ardent Health Partners, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Ardent”) are not currently subject to the reporting requirements of the SEC. The information related to Atria, Sunrise and Ardent contained or referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been derived from publicly available information or was provided to us by Atria, Sunrise or Ardent, as the case may be, and we have not verified this information through an independent investigation or otherwise. We have no reason to believe that this information is inaccurate in any material respect, but we cannot assure you of its accuracy.

iii


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
Item 15.
Item 16.


iv


PART I
    
ITEM 1.    Business

BUSINESS

Overview

Ventas, Inc., an S&P 500 company, is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) with a highly diversified portfolio of seniors housing and healthcare properties located throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. As of December 31, 2017, we owned more than 1,200 properties (including properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and properties classified as held for sale), consisting of seniors housing communities, medical office buildings (“MOBs”), life science and innovation centers, inpatient rehabilitation facilities (“IRFs”) and long-term acute care facilities (“LTACs”), health systems and skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”), and we had 14 properties under development, including four properties that are owned by unconsolidated real estate entities. Our company was originally founded in 1983 and is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.

We primarily invest in seniors housing and healthcare properties through acquisitions and lease our properties to unaffiliated tenants or operate them through independent third-party managers. As of December 31, 2017, we leased a total of 546 properties (excluding MOBs) to various healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures.

As of December 31, 2017, pursuant to long-term management agreements, we engaged independent operators, such as Atria Senior Living, Inc. (“Atria”) and Sunrise Senior Living, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Sunrise”), to manage 297 seniors housing communities for us.

Our three largest tenants, Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Brookdale Senior Living”), Ardent Health Partners, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Ardent”) and Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Kindred”) leased from us 135 properties (excluding one property managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to a long-term management agreement), 10 properties and 31 properties (excluding one MOB included within our office operations reportable business segment), respectively, as of December 31, 2017.

Through our Lillibridge Healthcare Services, Inc. (“Lillibridge”) subsidiary and our ownership interest in PMB Real Estate Services LLC (“PMBRES”), we also provide MOB management, leasing, marketing, facility development and advisory services to highly rated hospitals and health systems throughout the United States. In addition, from time to time, we make secured and non-mortgage loans and other investments relating to seniors housing and healthcare operators or properties.

We operate through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and office operations. See our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes, including “NOTE 2—ACCOUNTING POLICIES” and “NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION,” included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Business Strategy

We aim to enhance shareholder value by delivering consistent, superior total returns through a strategy of: (1) generating reliable and growing cash flows; (2) maintaining a balanced, diversified portfolio of high-quality assets; and (3) preserving our financial strength, flexibility and liquidity.

Generating Reliable and Growing Cash Flows

Generating reliable and growing cash flows from our seniors housing and healthcare assets enables us to pay regular cash dividends to stockholders and creates opportunities to increase stockholder value through profitable investments. The combination of steady contractual growth from our long-term triple-net leases, steady, reliable cash flows from our loan investments and stable cash flows from our office buildings with the higher growth potential inherent in our seniors housing operating communities drives our ability to generate sustainable, growing cash flows that are resilient to economic downturns.


1


Maintaining a Balanced, Diversified Portfolio

We believe that maintaining a balanced portfolio of high-quality assets diversified by investment type, geographic location, asset type, tenant/operator, revenue source and operating model diminishes the risk that any single factor or event could materially harm our business. Portfolio diversification also enhances the reliability of our cash flows by reducing our exposure to any individual tenant, operator or manager and making us less susceptible to single-state regulatory or reimbursement changes, regional climate events and local economic downturns.

Preserving Our Financial Strength, Flexibility and Liquidity

A strong, flexible balance sheet and excellent liquidity position us favorably to capitalize on strategic growth opportunities in the seniors housing and healthcare industries through acquisitions, investments and development and redevelopment projects. We maintain our financial strength to pursue profitable investment opportunities by actively managing our leverage, improving our cost of capital and preserving our access to multiple sources of liquidity, including unsecured bank debt, mortgage financings and public debt and equity markets.

2017 Highlights and Other Recent Developments

Investments and Dispositions

In March 2017, we provided secured debt financing to a subsidiary of Ardent to facilitate Ardent’s acquisition of LHP Hospital Group, Inc., which included a $700.0 million term loan and a $60.0 million revolving line of credit feature (of which $28.0 million was outstanding at December 31, 2017). The LIBOR-based debt financing has a five-year term, a one-year lock out feature and a weighted average interest rate of approximately 9.3% as of December 31, 2017 and is guaranteed by Ardent’s parent company.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we acquired 15 triple-net leased properties (including six assets previously owned by an equity method investee), four properties reported within our office operations reportable business segment (three life science, research and medical assets and one MOB) and three seniors housing communities (reported within our senior living operations reportable business segment) for an aggregate purchase price of $691.3 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we sold 53 triple-net leased properties, five MOBs and certain vacant land parcels for aggregate consideration of $870.8 million, and we recognized a gain on the sale of these assets of $717.3 million, net of taxes.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we received aggregate proceeds of $37.6 million for the partial prepayment and $35.5 million for the full repayment of loans receivable, which resulted in total gains of $0.6 million.     

Liquidity, Capital and Dividends

In March 2017, we issued and sold $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.100% senior notes due 2023 at a public offering price equal to 99.280% of par, for total proceeds of $397.1 million before the underwriting discount and expenses, and $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.850% senior notes due 2027 at a public offering price equal to 99.196% of par, for total proceeds of $396.8 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.

In April 2017, we entered into an unsecured credit facility comprised of a $3.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility, priced at LIBOR plus 0.875%, that replaced our previous $2.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility priced at LIBOR plus 1.0%.

In April 2017, we repaid in full, at par, $300.0 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 1.250% senior notes due 2017 upon maturity.

In June 2017, we issued and sold C$275.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.55% senior notes, Series D due 2023 at a price equal to 99.954% of par, for total proceeds of C$274.9 million before the agent fees and expenses. We used part of the proceeds to repay C$124.4 million on our unsecured term loan due 2019.

In August 2017, we used most of the proceeds from the sale of 22 SNFs to repay the balances then outstanding on the 2018 and 2019 term loans.

2


In September 2017, we entered into a new $400.0 million secured revolving construction credit facility which matures in 2022 and will be primarily used to finance life science and innovation center and other construction projects.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we issued and sold 1.1 million shares of common stock under our “at-the-market” (“ATM”) equity offering program. Aggregate net proceeds for these activities were $73.9 million, after sales agent commissions.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we paid the first three quarterly installments of our 2017 dividend of $0.775 per share. In December 2017, we declared the fourth quarter cash dividend on our common stock of $0.79 per share, which grew by 2% over third quarter 2017 and was paid in January 2018.

Portfolio

The sale of the triple-net leased properties above included 36 SNFs, owned by us and operated by Kindred. These assets were sold for aggregate consideration of approximately $700 million and we recognized a gain on the sale of $657.6 million, net of taxes.

Other Recent Developments

In January 2018, we transitioned the management of 76 private pay seniors housing communities to Eclipse Senior Living (“ESL”). These assets, substantially all of which were previously leased by Elmcroft Senior Living (“Elmcroft”), are now operated by ESL under a management contract with us. We acquired a 34% ownership stake in ESL with customary rights and protections. ESL management owns the remaining 66% stake. We also intend to form a new joint venture with an institutional partner related to the assets previously leased by Elmcroft. However, there can be no assurance whether, when or on what terms the joint venture will be completed.

Portfolio Summary

The following table summarizes our consolidated portfolio of properties and other investments as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real Estate Property Investments
 
Revenues
Asset Type
 
# of
Properties (1)
 
# of Units/
Sq. Ft./Beds(2)
 
Real Estate Property Investment, at Cost
 
Percent of
Total Real Estate Property Investments
 
Real Estate
Property
Investment Per Unit/Bed/Sq. Ft.
 
Revenue
 
Percent of Total Revenues
 
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Seniors housing communities
 
747

 
65,428

 
$16,616,501
 
63.4
%
 
$
254.0

 
$2,342,247
 
65.5
%
MOBs(3)
 
354

 
19,221,003

 
5,332,817

 
20.3

 
0.3

 
579,363

 
16.2

Life science and innovation centers
 
29

 
5,156,868

 
1,940,099

 
7.4

 
0.4

 
174,391

 
4.9

IRFs and LTACs
 
37

 
3,115

 
459,753

 
1.8

 
147.6

 
154,094

 
4.3

Health systems
 
12

 
2,064

 
1,475,975

 
5.6

 
715.1

 
109,546

 
3.1

SNFs
 
17

 
1,882

 
204,488

 
0.8

 
108.7

 
64,086

 
1.8

Development properties and other
 
10

 
 
 
176,200

 
0.7

 
 
 
 
 
 
Total real estate investments, at cost
 
1,206

 
 
 
$
26,205,833

 
100.0
%
 
 
 


 


Income from loans and investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
117,608

 
3.3

Interest and other income
 
 

 
 

 
 
 


 
 

 
6,034

 
0.2

Revenues related to assets classified as held for sale
 
8

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
26,780

 
0.7

Total revenues
 
 

 
 

 


 


 
 

 
$
3,574,149

 
100.0
%

(1) 
As of December 31, 2017, we also owned 17 seniors housing communities, 13 SNFs and one MOB through investments in unconsolidated entities. Our consolidated properties were located in 46 states, the District of Columbia, seven Canadian provinces and the United Kingdom and were operated or managed by 91 unaffiliated healthcare operating companies, including the following publicly traded companies or their subsidiaries: Brookdale Senior Living (129 properties) (excluding six properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and one property managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to a long-term management agreement and included in the senior living operations reportable business segment); Kindred (31 properties) (excluding one MOB included in the office operations reportable business segment); 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. (12 properties); Capital Senior Living Corporation (seven properties); Spire Healthcare plc (three properties); and HealthSouth Corp. (four properties).
(2) 
Seniors housing communities are measured in units; MOBs and life science and innovation centers are measured by square footage; and IRFs and LTACs, health systems and SNFs are measured by bed count.

3


(3) 
As of December 31, 2017, we leased 65 of our consolidated MOBs pursuant to triple-net leases, Lillibridge or PMBRES managed 270 of our consolidated MOBs and 19 of our consolidated MOBs were managed by seven unaffiliated managers. Through Lillibridge and PMBRES, we also provided management and leasing services for 105 MOBs owned by third parties as of December 31, 2017.

Seniors Housing and Healthcare Properties

As of December 31, 2017, we owned a total of 1,235 seniors housing and healthcare properties (including properties classified as held for sale) as follows:
 
Consolidated
(100% interest)
 
Consolidated
(<100% interest)
 
Unconsolidated
(5-25% interest)
 
Total
Seniors housing communities
738

 
9

 
17

 
764

MOBs
314

 
48

 
1

 
363

Life science and innovation centers
18

 
11

 

 
29

IRFs and LTACs

36

 
1

 

 
37

Health systems
12

 

 

 
12

SNFs
17

 

 
13

 
30

Total
1,135

 
69

 
31

 
1,235

    
Seniors Housing Communities

Our seniors housing communities include independent and assisted living communities, continuing care retirement communities and communities providing care for individuals with Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia or memory loss. These communities offer studio, one bedroom and two bedroom residential units on a month-to-month basis primarily to elderly individuals requiring various levels of assistance. Basic services for residents of these communities include housekeeping, meals in a central dining area and group activities organized by the staff with input from the residents. More extensive care and personal supervision, at additional fees, are also available for such needs as eating, bathing, grooming, transportation, limited therapeutic programs and medication administration, which allow residents certain conveniences and enable them to live as independently as possible according to their abilities. These services are often met by home health providers and through close coordination with the resident’s physician and SNFs. Charges for room, board and services are generally paid from private sources.

Medical Office Buildings

Typically, our MOBs are multi-tenant properties leased to several unrelated medical practices, although in many cases they may be associated with a large single specialty or multi-specialty group. Tenants include physicians, dentists, psychologists, therapists and other healthcare providers, who require space devoted to patient examination and treatment, diagnostic imaging, outpatient surgery and other outpatient services. MOBs are similar to commercial office buildings, although they require greater plumbing, electrical and mechanical systems to accommodate physicians’ requirements such as sinks in every room, brighter lights and specialized medical equipment. As of December 31, 2017, we owned or managed for third parties approximately 23 million square feet of MOBs that are predominantly located on or near a health system.

Life Science and Innovation Centers

Our life science and innovation centers contain laboratory and office space primarily for scientific research for universities, academic medical centers, technology, biotechnology, medical device and pharmaceutical companies and other organizations involved in the life science industry. While these properties have characteristics similar to commercial office buildings, they generally contain more advanced electrical, mechanical, and heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems. The facilities generally have specialty equipment including emergency generators, fume hoods, lab bench tops and related amenities. In many instances, life science tenants make significant investments to improve their leased space, in addition to landlord improvements, to accommodate biology, chemistry or medical device research initiatives. Our life science and innovation centers are primarily located on or contiguous to university and academic medical campuses. The campus settings allow us the opportunity to provide flexible, contiguous/adjacent expansion to accommodate the growth of existing tenants.

Inpatient Rehabilitation and Long-term Acute Care Facilities

We have 29 properties that are operated as LTACs. LTACs have a Medicare average length of stay of greater than 25 days and serve medically complex, chronically ill patients who require a high level of monitoring and specialized care, but whose conditions do not necessitate the continued services of an intensive care unit. The operators of these LTACs have the

4


capability to treat patients who suffer from multiple systemic failures or conditions such as neurological disorders, head injuries, brain stem and spinal cord trauma, cerebral vascular accidents, chemical brain injuries, central nervous system disorders, developmental anomalies and cardiopulmonary disorders. Chronic patients often depend on technology for continued life support, such as mechanical ventilators, total parenteral nutrition, respiration or cardiac monitors and dialysis machines, and, due to their severe medical conditions, generally are not clinically appropriate for admission to a nursing facility or rehabilitation hospital. All of our LTACs are freestanding facilities, and we do not own any “hospitals within hospitals.” We also own eight IRFs devoted to the rehabilitation of patients with various neurological, musculoskeletal, orthopedic and other medical conditions following stabilization of their acute medical issues.

Health Systems

We have 12 properties that are operated as health systems. Health systems provide medical and surgical services, including inpatient care, intensive care, cardiac care, diagnostic services and emergency services. These health systems also provide outpatient services such as outpatient surgery, laboratory, radiology, respiratory therapy, cardiology and physical therapy. In the United States, these health systems receive payments for patient services from the federal government primarily under the Medicare program, state governments under their respective Medicaid or similar programs, health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations, other private insurers and directly from patients.

Skilled Nursing Facilities

We have 17 properties that are operated as SNFs. SNFs provide rehabilitative, restorative, skilled nursing and medical treatment for patients and residents who do not require the high technology, care-intensive, high cost setting of an acute care or rehabilitation hospital. Treatment programs include physical, occupational, speech, respiratory and other therapies, including sub-acute clinical protocols such as wound care and intravenous drug treatment. Charges for these services are generally paid from a combination of government reimbursement and private sources.

Geographic Diversification of Properties

Our portfolio of seniors housing and healthcare properties is broadly diversified by geographic location throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, with properties in only one state (California) accounting for more than 10% of our total continuing revenues and net operating income (“NOI,” which is defined as total revenues, excluding interest and other income, less property-level operating expenses and office building services costs) for the year ended December 31, 2017.


5


The following table shows our continuing rental income and resident fees and services by geographic location for the year ended December 31, 2017:
 
Rental Income and
Resident Fees and
Services
 
Percent of Total
Revenues
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Geographic Location
 
 
 
California
$
546,184

 
15.3
%
New York
308,366

 
8.6

Texas
206,709

 
5.8

Illinois
170,846

 
4.8

Florida
158,889

 
4.4

Pennsylvania
148,882

 
4.2

Connecticut
114,040

 
3.2

Georgia
114,038

 
3.2

North Carolina
112,137

 
3.1

Arizona
104,684

 
2.9

Other (36 states and the District of Columbia)
1,239,588

 
34.8

Total U.S
3,224,363

 
90.3
%
Canada (7 provinces)
186,049

 
5.2

United Kingdom
26,418

 
0.7

Total(1)
$
3,436,830

 
96.2
%

(1)
The remainder of our total revenues is office building and other services revenue, income from loans and investments and interest and other income.
    
The following table shows our continuing NOI by geographic location for the year ended December 31, 2017:
 
NOI (1)
 
Percent of Total
NOI
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Geographic Location
 
 
 
California
$
288,435

 
13.9
%
Texas
132,305

 
6.4

New York
119,123

 
5.7

Illinois
107,034

 
5.1

Florida
93,746

 
4.5

Pennsylvania
82,900

 
4.0

Connecticut
73,121

 
3.5

North Carolina
60,188

 
2.9

Washington
42,816

 
2.1

Indiana
43,992

 
2.1

Other (36 states and the District of Columbia)
801,854

 
38.5

Total U.S
1,845,514

 
88.7
%
Canada (7 provinces)
92,112

 
4.4

United Kingdom
26,418

 
1.3

Total (2)
$
1,964,044

 
94.4
%

(1)
See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Non-GAAP Financial Measures—NOI” included in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a reconciliation of NOI to its most directly comparable GAAP measure, income from continuing operations.
(2)
The remainder of our total NOI is income from loans and investments.

6


See “NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding the geographic diversification of our portfolio.

Loans and Investments

As of December 31, 2017, we had $1.4 billion of net loans receivable and investments relating to seniors housing and healthcare operators or properties. Our loans receivable and investments provide us with interest income, principal amortization and transaction fees and are typically secured by mortgage liens or leasehold mortgages on the underlying properties and corporate or personal guarantees by affiliates of the borrowing entity. In some cases, the loans are secured by a pledge of ownership interests in the entity or entities that own the related seniors housing or healthcare properties. From time to time, we also make investments in mezzanine loans, which are subordinated to senior secured loans held by other investors that encumber the same real estate. See “NOTE 6—LOANS RECEIVABLE AND INVESTMENTS” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Development and Redevelopment Projects

We are party to certain agreements that obligate us to develop seniors housing or healthcare properties funded through capital that we and, in certain circumstances, our joint venture partners provide. As of December 31, 2017, we had 14 properties under development pursuant to these agreements, including four properties that are owned through unconsolidated real estate entities. In addition, from time to time, we engage in redevelopment projects with respect to our existing seniors housing communities to maximize the value, increase NOI, maintain a market-competitive position, achieve property stabilization or change the primary use of the property.

Segment Information

We operate through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and office operations. Non-segment assets, classified as “all other,” consist primarily of corporate assets, including cash, restricted cash, loans receivable and investments, and miscellaneous accounts receivable. Our chief operating decision makers evaluate performance of the combined properties in each reportable business segment and determine how to allocate resources to these segments, in significant part, based on segment NOI and related measures. For further information regarding our business segments and a discussion of our definition of segment NOI, see “NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Significant Tenants, Operators and Managers

The following table summarizes certain information regarding our tenant, operator and manager concentration as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 (excluding properties classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017):
 
Number of
Properties Leased
or Managed
 
Percent of Total Real Estate Investments (1)
 
Percent of Total Revenues
 
Percent of NOI
Senior living operations (2)
293

 
35.1
%
 
51.9
%
 
29.0
%
Brookdale Senior Living (3)
129

 
7.5

 
4.9

 
8.3

Ardent
10

 
4.9

 
3.1

 
5.4

Kindred (4)
32

 
1.1

 
4.3

 
7.5


(1)
Based on gross book value.
(2)
Excludes four properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities.
(3)
Excludes six properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and one property managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to a long-term management agreement and included in the senior living operations reportable business segment.
(4)
Includes one MOB included in the office operations reportable business segment.

Triple-Net Leased Properties

Each of our leases with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred is a triple-net lease that obligates the tenant to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures, and to comply with the terms of the mortgage financing documents, if any, affecting the properties. In addition, each of our Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred leases has a corporate guaranty. Brookdale Senior Living has multiple leases with us and those leases contain cross-default provisions tied to each other, as well as lease renewals by lease agreement or by pool of assets.

7


The properties we lease to Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred accounted for a significant portion of our triple-net leased properties segment revenues and NOI for the year ended December 31, 2017. If any of Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred becomes unable or unwilling to satisfy its obligations to us or to renew its leases with us upon expiration of the terms thereof, our financial condition and results of operations could decline, and our ability to service our indebtedness and to make distributions to our stockholders could be impaired. We cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable them to satisfy their respective obligations to us, and any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity, our ability to service our indebtedness and other obligations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders, as required for us to continue to qualify as a REIT (a “Material Adverse Effect”). We also cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will elect to renew their respective leases with us upon expiration of the leases or that we will be able to reposition any non-renewed properties on a timely basis or on the same or better economic terms, if at all. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Our leases and other agreements with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to satisfy its obligations under our agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” included in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Brookdale Senior Living Leases

As of December 31, 2017, we leased 129 consolidated properties (excluding one property managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to a long-term management agreement and included in the senior living operations reportable business segment) to Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to multiple lease agreements.

Pursuant to our lease agreements, Brookdale Senior Living is obligated to pay base rent, which escalates annually at a specified rate over the prior period base rent. As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate 2018 contractual cash rent due to us from Brookdale Senior Living, excluding variable interest that Brookdale Senior Living is obligated to pay as additional rent based on certain floating rate mortgage debt, was approximately $180.3 million, and the current aggregate contractual base rent (computed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”)) due to us from Brookdale Senior Living, excluding the variable interest, was approximately $162.3 million (in each case, excluding six properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities as of December 31, 2017). See “NOTE 3—CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK” and “NOTE 14—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Ardent Lease

As of December 31, 2017, we leased 10 properties to Ardent pursuant to a single, triple-net master lease agreement. Per our master lease agreement, Ardent is obligated to pay base rent, which escalates annually by the lesser of four times the increase in the consumer price index for the relevant period and 2.5%.  The initial term of the master lease expires on August 31, 2035 and Ardent has one ten-year renewal option.

As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate 2018 contractual cash rent due to us from Ardent was approximately $113.4 million, and the current aggregate contractual base rent (computed in accordance with GAAP) due to us from Ardent was also approximately $113.4 million

Kindred Master Leases

As of December 31, 2017, we leased 29 properties to Kindred pursuant to a master lease agreement. In November 2016, Kindred extended the lease term to 2025 for all of our LTACs operated by Kindred that were scheduled to mature in 2018 and 2020, at the current rent level.

The aggregate annual rent we receive under each Kindred master lease is referred to as “base rent.” Base rent escalates annually at a specified rate over the prior period base rent, contingent, in some cases, upon the satisfaction of specified facility revenue parameters. The annual rent escalator under the Kindred master lease for 25 properties is based on year-over-year changes in CPI, subject to a floor and cap, and is 2.7% for four properties. As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate 2018 contractual cash rent due to us from Kindred was approximately $122.0 million, and the current aggregate contractual base rent (computed in accordance with GAAP) due to us from Kindred was approximately $122.7 million
 

8


Senior Living Operations

As of December 31, 2017, Atria and Sunrise, collectively, provided comprehensive property management and accounting services with respect to 269 consolidated seniors housing communities, for which we pay annual management fees pursuant to long-term management agreements. Most of our management agreements with Atria have initial terms expiring either July 31, 2024 or December 31, 2027, with successive automatic ten-year renewal periods. The management fees payable to Atria under most of the Atria management agreements range from 4.5% to 5% of revenues generated by the applicable properties, and Atria can earn up to an additional 1% of revenues based on the achievement of specified performance targets. Most of our management agreements with Sunrise have terms ranging from 25 to 30 years (which commenced as early as 2004 and as recently as 2012). The base management fees payable to Sunrise on consolidated assets under the Sunrise management agreements generally range from 5% to 7% of revenues generated by the applicable properties. See “NOTE 3—CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Because Atria and Sunrise manage our properties in exchange for the receipt of a management fee from us, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants. However, we rely on our managers’ personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations efficiently and effectively. We also rely on our managers to set appropriate resident fees and otherwise operate our seniors housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, including various rights to terminate and exercise remedies under those agreements as provided therein, Atria’s or Sunrise’s failure, inability or unwillingness to satisfy its respective obligations under those agreements, to efficiently and effectively manage our properties or to provide timely and accurate accounting information with respect thereto could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. In addition, significant changes in Atria’s or Sunrise’s senior management or equity ownership or any adverse developments in their businesses or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—The properties managed by Atria and Sunrise account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; adverse developments in Atria’s or Sunrise’s business and affairs or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” and “—We have rights to terminate our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise in whole or with respect to specific properties under certain circumstances, and we may be unable to replace Atria or Sunrise if our management agreements are terminated or not renewed” included in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our 34% ownership interest in Atria entitles us to certain rights and minority protections, as well as the right to appoint two of six members on the Atria Board of Directors.

Competition

We generally compete for investments in seniors housing and healthcare assets with publicly traded, private and non-listed healthcare REITs, real estate partnerships, healthcare providers, healthcare lenders and other investors, including developers, banks, insurance companies, pension funds, government-sponsored entities and private equity firms, some of whom may have greater financial resources and lower costs of capital than we do. Increased competition challenges our ability to identify and successfully capitalize on opportunities that meet our objectives, which is affected by, among other factors, the availability of suitable acquisition or investment targets, our ability to negotiate acceptable transaction terms and our access to and cost of capital. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Our ongoing strategy depends, in part, upon future investments in and acquisitions of, or our development or redevelopment of, seniors housing and healthcare assets, and we may not be successful in identifying and consummating these transactions” included in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and “NOTE 10—SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our tenants, operators and managers also compete on a local and regional basis with other healthcare operating companies that provide comparable services. Seniors housing community, SNF and health systems operators compete to attract and retain residents and patients to our properties based on scope and quality of care, reputation and financial condition, price, location and physical appearance of the properties, services offered, qualified personnel, physician referrals and family preferences. With respect to MOBs, we and our third-party managers compete to attract and retain tenants based on many of the same factors, in addition to quality of the affiliated health system, physician preferences and proximity to hospital campuses. The ability of our tenants, operators and managers to compete successfully could be affected by private, federal and state reimbursement programs and other laws and regulations. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Our tenants, operators and managers may be adversely affected by healthcare regulation and enforcement” and “—Changes in the reimbursement rates or methods of payment from third-party payors, including insurance companies and the Medicare and

9


Medicaid programs, could have a material adverse effect on certain of our tenants and operators and on us” included in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Employees

As of December 31, 2017, we had 493 employees, none of which is subject to a collective bargaining agreement. We believe that relations with our employees are positive.

Insurance

We maintain or require in our lease, management and other agreements that our tenants, operators and managers maintain all applicable lines of insurance on our properties and their operations. We believe that the amount and scope of insurance coverage provided by our policies and the policies required to be maintained by our tenants, operators and managers are customary for similarly situated companies in our industry. Although we regularly monitor our tenants’, operators’ and managers’ compliance with their respective insurance requirements, we cannot assure you that they will maintain the required insurance coverages, and any failure, inability or unwillingness by our tenants, operators and managers to do so could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. We also cannot assure you that we will continue to require the same levels of insurance coverage under our lease, management and other agreements, that such insurance coverage will be available at a reasonable cost in the future or that the policies maintained will fully cover all losses related to our properties upon the occurrence of a catastrophic event, nor can we assure you of the future financial viability of the insurers.

We maintain the property insurance for all of our senior living operations, as well as the general and professional liability insurance for our seniors housing communities and related operations managed by Atria. However, Sunrise maintains the general and professional liability insurance for our seniors housing communities and related operations that it manages in accordance with the terms of our management agreements. Under our management agreements with Sunrise, we may elect, on an annual basis, whether we or Sunrise will bear responsibility for maintaining the required insurance coverage for the applicable properties, but the costs of such insurance are facility expenses paid from the revenues of those properties, regardless of who maintains the insurance.

Through our office operations, we provide engineering, construction and architectural services in connection with new development projects, and any design, construction or systems failures related to the properties we develop could result in substantial injury or damage to our clients or third parties. Any such injury or damage claims may arise in the ordinary course and may be asserted with respect to ongoing or completed projects. Although we maintain liability insurance to protect us against these claims, if any claim results in a loss, we cannot assure you that our policy limits would be adequate to cover the loss in full. If we sustain losses in excess of our insurance coverage, we may be required to pay the difference and we could lose our investment in, or experience reduced profits and cash flows from, the affected MOB or life science and innovation center, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

For various reasons, including to reduce and manage costs, many healthcare companies utilize different organizational and corporate structures coupled with self-insurance trusts or captive programs that may provide less coverage than a traditional insurance policy. As a result, companies that self-insure could incur large funded and unfunded general and professional liability expenses, which could have a material adverse effect on their liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. The implementation of a trust or captive by any of our tenants, operators or managers could adversely affect such person’s ability to satisfy its obligations under, or otherwise comply with the terms of, its respective lease, management and other agreements with us, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. Likewise, if we decide to implement a captive or self-insurance program, any large funded and unfunded general and professional liability expenses that we incur could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Additional Information

We maintain a website at www.ventasreit.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and our web address is included as an inactive textual reference only.

We make available, free of charge, through our website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. In addition, our Guidelines on Governance, our Global Code of Ethics and Business Conduct (including waivers from and amendments to that document) and the charters for each of our Audit and Compliance, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Executive Compensation Committees are available on our website, and we will mail copies of the foregoing documents to

10


stockholders, free of charge, upon request to our Corporate Secretary at Ventas, Inc., 353 North Clark Street, Suite 3300, Chicago, Illinois 60654.

GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION

Healthcare Regulation

Overview

Our tenants, operators and managers are typically subject to extensive and complex federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to quality of care, licensure and certificate of need, government reimbursement, fraud and abuse practices, qualifications of personnel, adequacy of plant and equipment, and other laws and regulations governing the operation of healthcare facilities. Healthcare is a highly regulated industry and that trend will, in general, continue in the future. The applicable rules are wide-ranging and can subject our tenants, operators and managers to civil, criminal, and administrative sanctions, including: the possible loss of accreditation or license; denial of reimbursement; imposition of fines; suspension, decertification, or exclusion from federal and state healthcare programs; or facility closure. Changes in laws or regulations, reimbursement policies, enforcement activity and regulatory non-compliance by tenants, operators and managers can all have a significant effect on their operations and financial condition, which in turn may adversely impact us, as detailed below and set forth under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In 2017, Congress came within a single vote of repealing of the Affordable Care Act (the “ACA”) and substantially reducing funding to the Medicaid program. Short of full repeal, new legislation is likely to be introduced to seek similar changes in 2018. Beyond this, significant changes to commercial health insurance and government sponsored insurance (i.e. Medicare and Medicaid) remain possible. Commercial and government payors, are likely to continue imposing greater discounts and more stringent cost controls upon operators, through changes in reimbursement rates and methodologies, discounted fee structures, the assumption by healthcare providers of all or a portion of the financial risk or otherwise. A shift toward less comprehensive health insurance coverage and increased consumer cost-sharing on health expenditures could have a material adverse effect on certain of our operators’ liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and, in turn, their ability to satisfy their contractual obligations, including making rental payments under and otherwise complying with the terms of our leases.

Licensure, Certification and CONs

In general, the operators of our inpatient rehabilitation and long-term acute care facilities, health systems and skilled nursing facilities (collectively “healthcare facilities”) must be licensed and periodically certified through various regulatory agencies that determine compliance with federal, state and local laws to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Legal requirements pertaining to such licensure and certification relate to the quality of medical care provided by the operator, qualifications of the operator’s administrative personnel and clinical staff, adequacy of the physical plant and equipment and continuing compliance with applicable laws and regulations. A loss of licensure or certification could adversely affect a healthcare facility operator’s ability to receive payments from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, which, in turn, could adversely affect its ability to satisfy its obligations to us.

In addition, many of our healthcare facilities are subject to state certificate of need (“CON”) laws that require governmental approval prior to the development or expansion of healthcare facilities and services. The approval process in these states generally requires a facility to demonstrate the need for additional or expanded healthcare facilities or services. CONs, where applicable, are also sometimes necessary for changes in ownership or control of licensed facilities, addition of beds, investment in major capital equipment, introduction of new services or termination of services previously approved through the CON process. CON laws and regulations may restrict an operator’s ability to expand our properties and grow its business in certain circumstances, which could have an adverse effect on the operator’s revenues and, in turn, its ability to make rental payments under and otherwise comply with the terms of our leases. See “Risk Factors-Risks Arising from Our Business-If we must replace any of our tenants or operators, we might be unable to reposition the properties on as favorable terms, or at all, and we could be subject to delays, limitations and expenses, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

State CON laws remained largely unchanged in 2017, with the exception of North Carolina. North Carolina’s CON statute, underwent minor changes in 2017 by exempting from CON review new institutional health services involving the acquisition of an unlicensed adult care home that was previously licensed.


11


    Compared to healthcare facilities, seniors housing communities (other than those that receive Medicaid payments) do not receive significant funding from governmental healthcare programs and are subject to relatively few, if any, federal regulations. Instead, to the extent they are regulated, such regulation consists primarily of state and local laws governing licensure, provision of services, staffing requirements and other operational matters, which vary greatly from one jurisdiction to another. Although recent growth in the U.S. seniors housing industry has attracted the attention of various federal agencies that believe more federal regulation of these properties is necessary, Congress thus far has deferred to state regulation of seniors housing communities. However, as a result of this growth and increased federal scrutiny, some states have revised and strengthened their regulation of seniors housing communities, and more states are expected to do the same in the future.

As discussed in greater detail below, a number of states have instituted Medicaid waiver programs that blend the functions of healthcare and custodial care providers, and expand the scope of services that can be provided under certain licenses. The trend toward this kind of experimentation is likely to continue, and even hasten, under Republican leadership. The temporary and experimental nature of these programs means that states will also continue to adjust their licensing and certification processes which might result in some providers facing increased competition and others facing new requirements.

Fraud and Abuse Enforcement

Healthcare facilities and seniors housing communities that receive Medicaid payments are subject to various complex federal, state and local laws and regulations that govern healthcare providers' relationships and arrangements and prohibit fraudulent and abusive business practices. These laws and regulations include, among others:

Federal and state false claims acts, which, among other things, prohibit healthcare providers from filing false claims or making false statements to receive payment from Medicare, Medicaid or other governmental healthcare programs;

Federal and state anti-kickback and fee-splitting statutes, including the Medicare and Medicaid anti-kickback statute, which prohibit the payment, receipt or solicitation of any remuneration to induce referrals of patients for items or services covered by a governmental healthcare program, including Medicare and Medicaid;

Federal and state physician self-referral laws, including the federal Stark Law, which generally prohibits physicians from referring patients enrolled in certain governmental healthcare programs to providers of certain designated health services in which the referring physician or an immediate family member of the referring physician has an ownership or other financial interest;

The federal Civil Monetary Penalties Law, which authorizes the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) to impose civil penalties administratively for fraudulent acts; and

State and federal data privacy and security laws, including the privacy and security rules of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, which provide for the privacy and security of certain individually identifiable health information.

Violating these healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations may result in criminal and civil penalties, such as punitive sanctions, damage assessments, monetary penalties, imprisonment, denial of Medicare and Medicaid payments, and exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The responsibility for enforcing these laws and regulations lies with a variety or federal, state and local governmental agencies, however many of the laws and regulations can also be enforced by private litigants through federal and state false claims acts and other laws that allow private individuals to bring whistleblower suits known as qui tam actions.

Congress has significantly increased funding to the governmental agencies charged with enforcing the healthcare fraud and abuse laws to facilitate increased audits, investigations and prosecutions of providers suspected of healthcare fraud. As a result, government investigations and enforcement actions brought against healthcare providers have increased significantly in recent years and are expected to continue. A violation of federal or state anti-fraud and abuse laws or regulations by an operator of our properties could have a material adverse effect on the operator’s liquidity, financial condition or results of operations, which could adversely affect its ability to satisfy its contractual obligations, including making rental payments under and otherwise complying with the terms of our leases.

The current presidential administration has signaled it will expand current efforts to enforce healthcare fraud and abuse laws by increasing funding for the Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control program. Additionally, Attorney General Jeff Sessions has stated that he will make it a high priority to prosecute fraud in federal claims while the administrator of the Centers for

12


Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”), Seema Verma, has underscored this administration’s focus on healthcare fraud, stating that she will ensure that efforts preventing fraud and abuse are a priority. Further, many state Medicaid programs continue to devote additional resources to fraud, waste, and abuse initiatives. Medicaid reform plans might include lowering the growth rate of Medicaid spending, which will put pressure on states to exert greater scrutiny over the utilization of services. It is likely that states will have increased flexibility and incentive to monitor utilization patterns and take action against outlier providers.

Medicare’s fraud, waste, and abuse initiatives are also being retooled by the current presidential administration. Because a backlog of provider appeals in response to Medicare audits, CMS finalized significant changes intended to expedite the Medicare appeals process in 2017, particularly at the administrative law judge level of review.  These changes apply to appeals of payment and coverage determinations for items and services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries, enrollees in Medicare Advantage and other Medicare competitive health plans, and enrollees in Medicare prescription drug plans, as well as to appeals of enrollment and entitlement determinations, and certain premium appeals. The Recovery Audit Contractor program, which has recovered more than $2 billion for the Medicare program, also continues to be controversial and may be modified under the new administration.

Reimbursement

The majority of SNF reimbursement, and a significant percentage of health system, IRF and LTAC reimbursement, is through Medicare and Medicaid. Medical buildings and other healthcare related properties have provider tenants that participate in Medicare and Medicaid. These programs are often their largest source of funding. Seniors housing communities generally do not receive funding from Medicare or Medicaid, but their ability to retain their residents is impacted by policy decisions and initiatives established by the administrators of Medicare and Medicaid. The passage of the ACA in 2010 allowed formerly uninsured Americans to acquire coverage and utilize additional health care services. In addition, the ACA gave new authorities to implement Medicaid waiver and pilot programs that impact healthcare and long term custodial care reimbursement by Medicare and Medicaid. These activities promote “aging in place”, allowing senior citizens to stay longer in seniors housing communities, and diverting or delaying their admission into SNFs. The potential risks that accompany these regulatory and market changes are discussed below.

As a result of the ACA, and specifically Medicaid expansion and establishment of health insurance exchanges providing subsidized health insurance, an estimated seventeen million more Americans have health insurance than in 2010. These newly-insured Americans utilize services delivered by providers at medical buildings and other healthcare facilities. The current presidential administration and Republican-controlled Congress nearly repealed the ACA in 2017 and remain committed to repealing the ACA and replacing it with a less federalized model for providing health insurance to individuals and families unable to purchase health insurance on their own. The details of the replacement model are not yet known, but potential end results could be fewer insured individuals and families or individuals and families maintaining less comprehensive insurance coverage. Outside of ACA repeal, Republicans leaders, particularly in the House of Representatives, are committed to pursuing entitlement reforms in 2018 that could lower funding to major federal programs, particularly Medicaid and lessen the number of people covered by these programs. Even without legislation, the current presidential administration has issued regulations that may lessen the number of people who purchase ACA-compliant health insurance, which has the potential to provide less protection to people coping with expensive health conditions. Any of these outcomes could adversely impact the resources of our operators.

Enabled by the Medicare Modernization Act (2003) and subsequent laws, Medicare and Medicaid have implemented pilot programs (officially termed demonstrations or models) to “divert” elderly from SNFs and promote “aging in place” in “the least restrictive environment.” Several states have implemented home and community-based Medicaid waiver programs that increase the support services available to senior citizens in senior housing, lengthening the time that many seniors can live outside of a SNF. These Medicaid waiver programs are subject to re-approval and pilots are time-limited. The current presidential administration is not necessarily opposed to these efforts, but is committed to giving states greater control of their Medicaid programs. The result could be the modification or curtailment of a number of existing pilots.

CMS is currently in the midst of transitioning Medicare from a traditional fee-for-service reimbursement model to capitated and value-based approaches in which the government pays a set amount for each beneficiary for a defined period of time, based on that person’s underlying medical needs, rather than the actual services provided. The result is increasing use of management tools to oversee individual providers and coordinate their services. This puts downward pressure on the number and expense of services provided. Roughly 10 million Medicare beneficiaries now receive care via accountable care organizations, and another 19 million are enrolled in Medicare

13


Advantage health plans. The continued trend toward capitated and value-based approaches - particularly Medicare Advantage, which is expected to grow under the current presidential administration - has the potential to diminish the market for certain healthcare providers, particularly specialist physicians and providers of particular diagnostic technologies such as medical resonance imaging services. This could adversely impact the medical properties that house these physicians and medical technology providers.

The majority of Medicare payments continue to be made through traditional Medicare Part A and Part B fee-for-service schedules. Medicare’s payment regulations, particularly with respect to certain hospitals, skilled nursing care, and home health services have resulted in lower net pay increases than providers of those services often desire. In addition, the Medicare and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) of 2015 establishes a multi-year transition into pay-for-quality approaches for Medicare physicians and other providers. This will include payment reductions for providers who do not meet government quality standards. The implementation of pay-for-quality models is expected to produce funding disparities that could adversely impact some provider tenants in MOBs and other health care properties. The current presidential administration has made public comments about protecting Medicare generally and improving Medicare and MACRA for healthcare providers, but few specifics are known at this time. A negative payment update in 2017 for home health reimbursement demonstrates that the current presidential administration, regardless of public statements, may take actions adverse to certain provider types.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, approximately 8.4% of our total revenues and 14.5% of our total NOI (in each case excluding amounts in discontinued operations) were attributable to healthcare facilities in which our third-party tenants receive reimbursement for their services under governmental healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. We are neither a participant in, nor a direct recipient of, any reimbursement under these programs with respect to those leased facilities.

Life Science and Innovation Centers

In 2016, we entered the life science and innovation (“life science”) sector through the acquisitions of substantially all of the university affiliated life science real estate assets of Wexford Science & Technology, LLC from affiliates of Blackstone Real Estate Partners VIII, L.P. The life science tenants of these assets are largely university-affiliated organizations. These university-affiliated life science tenants are dependent on government funding to varying degrees. Creating a new pharmaceutical product or medical device requires substantial investments of time and capital, in part because of the extensive regulation of the healthcare industry; it also entails considerable risk of failure in demonstrating that the product is safe and effective and in gaining regulatory approval and market acceptance. Therefore, our tenants in the life science industry face high levels of regulation, expense and uncertainty.

Some of our life sciences tenants require significant outlays of funds for the research, development and clinical testing of their products and technologies. If private investors, the federal government or other sources of funding are unavailable to support such activities, a tenant’s life sciences operation may be adversely affected or fail. Further, the research, development, clinical testing, manufacture and marketing of some of our tenants’ products requires federal, state and foreign regulatory approvals which may be costly or difficult to obtain. Even after a life sciences tenant gains regulatory approval and market acceptance for a product, the product may still present significant regulatory and liability risks, including, among others, the possible later discovery of safety concerns, competition from new products and the expiration of patent protection for the product. Our tenants with marketable products may be adversely affected by healthcare reform and government reimbursement policies, including changes under the current presidential administration or by private healthcare payors. Likewise, our tenants may be unable to adequately protect their intellectual property under patent, copyright or trade secret laws. If our life sciences tenants’ businesses are adversely affected, they may have difficulty making payments to us, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Environmental Regulation

As an owner of real property, we are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding environmental, health and safety matters.

These laws and regulations address, among other things, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, fuel oil management, wastewater discharges, air emissions, radioactive materials, medical wastes, and hazardous wastes, and, in certain cases, the costs of complying with these laws and regulations and the penalties for non-compliance can be substantial. With respect to our properties that are operated or managed by third parties, we may be held primarily or jointly and severally liable for costs relating to the investigation and clean-up of any property from which there is or has been an actual or threatened release of a regulated material and any other affected properties, regardless of whether we knew of or caused the release. Such costs typically are not limited by law or regulation and could exceed the property’s value. In addition, we may be liable for certain

14


other costs, such as governmental fines and injuries to persons, property or natural resources, as a result of any such actual or threatened release. See “Risk Factors-Risks Arising from Our Business-We could incur substantial liabilities and costs if any of our properties are found to be contaminated with hazardous substances or we become involved in any environmental disputes” included in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Under the terms of our lease, management and other agreements, we generally have a right to indemnification by the tenants, operators and managers of our properties for any contamination caused by them. However, we cannot assure you that our tenants, operators and managers will have the financial capability or willingness to satisfy their respective indemnification obligations to us, and any failure, inability or unwillingness to do so may require us to satisfy the underlying environmental claims.

In general, we have also agreed to indemnify our tenants and operators against any environmental claims (including penalties and clean-up costs) resulting from any condition arising in, on or under, or relating to, the leased properties at any time before the applicable lease commencement date. With respect to our senior living operating portfolio, we have agreed to indemnify our managers against any environmental claims (including penalties and clean- up costs) resulting from any condition on those properties, unless the manager caused or contributed to that condition.

We did not make any material capital expenditures in connection with environmental, health, and safety laws, ordinances and regulations in 2017 and do not expect that we will be required to make any such material capital expenditures during 2018.

Canada

In Canada, seniors housing communities are currently generally subject to significantly less regulation than skilled nursing facilities and hospitals, and the regulation of such facilities is principally a matter of provincial and municipal jurisdiction. As a result, the regulatory regimes that apply to seniors housing communities vary depending on the province (and in certain circumstances, the city) in which a facility is located. Recently, certain Canadian provinces have taken steps to implement regulatory measures that could result in enhanced regulation for seniors housing communities in such provinces.

ITEM 1A.    Risk Factors
This section discusses the most significant factors that affect our business, operations and financial condition. It does not describe all risks and uncertainties applicable to us, our industry or ownership of our securities. If any of the following risks, or any other risks and uncertainties that are not addressed below or that we have not yet identified, actually occur, we could be materially adversely affected and the value of our securities could decline.
We have grouped these risk factors into three general categories:
Risks arising from our business;
Risks arising from our capital structure; and
Risks arising from our status as a REIT.
Risks Arising from Our Business
The properties managed by Atria and Sunrise account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; adverse developments in Atria’s or Sunrise’s business and affairs or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
As of December 31, 2017, Atria and Sunrise, collectively, managed 273 of our seniors housing communities pursuant to long-term management agreements. These properties represent a substantial portion of our portfolio, based on their gross book value, and account for a significant portion of our revenues and NOI. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, we rely on Atria’s and Sunrise’s personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations. We also rely on Atria and Sunrise to set appropriate resident fees, to provide accurate property-level financial results for our properties in a timely manner and to otherwise operate our seniors housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. For example, we depend on Atria’s and Sunrise’s ability to attract and retain skilled management personnel who are responsible for the day-to-day operations of our seniors housing communities. A shortage of nurses or other trained personnel or general inflationary pressures may force Atria or Sunrise to enhance its pay and benefits package to compete effectively for such personnel, but it may not be able to offset these added costs by increasing the

15


rates charged to residents. Any increase in labor costs and other property operating expenses, any failure by Atria or Sunrise to attract and retain qualified personnel, or significant changes in Atria’s or Sunrise’s senior management or equity ownership could adversely affect the income we receive from our seniors housing communities and have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Because Atria and Sunrise manage our properties in exchange for the receipt of a management fee from us, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants. However, any adverse developments in Atria’s or Sunrise’s business and affairs or financial condition could impair its ability to manage our properties efficiently and effectively and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. If Atria or Sunrise experiences any significant financial, legal, accounting or regulatory difficulties due to a weak economy or otherwise, such difficulties could result in, among other adverse events, acceleration of its indebtedness, impairment of its continued access to capital, the enforcement of default remedies by its counterparties, or the commencement of insolvency proceedings by or against it under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, any one or a combination of which indirectly could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Our leases and other agreements with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to satisfy its obligations under our agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
The properties we lease to Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred account for a significant portion of our revenues and NOI, and we depend on Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred to pay all insurance, taxes, utilities and maintenance and repair expenses in connection with the leased properties and properties that are collateral for the loans. We cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable them to satisfy their respective obligations to us, and any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to do so could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. In addition, any failure by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to effectively conduct its operations or to maintain and improve such properties could adversely affect its business reputation and its ability to attract and retain patients and residents in such properties, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred have agreed to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless from and against various claims, litigation and liabilities arising in connection with their respective businesses, and we cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will have sufficient assets, income, access to financing and insurance coverage to enable them to satisfy their respective indemnification obligations.
We face potential adverse consequences from the bankruptcy, insolvency or financial deterioration of one or more of our tenants, operators, borrowers, managers and other obligors.
We lease our properties to unaffiliated tenants or operate them through independent third-party managers. We are also a direct or indirect lender to various tenants and operators.  We have very limited control over the success or failure of our tenants’ and operators’ businesses and, at any time, a tenant or operator may experience a downturn in its business that weakens its financial condition. If that happens, the tenant or operator may fail to make its payments to us when due. Although our lease, loan and management agreements give us the right to exercise certain remedies in the event of default on the obligations owing to us, we may determine not to do so if we believe that enforcement of our rights would be more detrimental to our business than seeking alternative approaches.
A downturn in any of our tenants’ or operators’ businesses could ultimately lead to bankruptcy if it is unable to timely resolve the underlying causes, which may be largely outside of its control. Bankruptcy and insolvency laws afford certain rights to a party that has filed for bankruptcy or reorganization that may render certain of these remedies unenforceable, or, at the least, delay our ability to pursue such remedies and realize any recoveries in connection therewith. For example, we cannot evict a tenant or operator solely because of its bankruptcy filing.
A debtor-lessee may reject our lease in a bankruptcy proceeding, in which case our claim against the debtor-lessee for unpaid and future rents would be limited by the statutory cap of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This statutory cap could be substantially less than the remaining rent actually owed under the lease, and any claim we have for unpaid rent might not be paid in full. In addition, a debtor-lessee may assert in a bankruptcy proceeding that our lease should be re-characterized as a financing agreement, in which case our rights and remedies as a lender, compared to a landlord, generally would be more limited. If a debtor-manager seeks bankruptcy protection, the automatic stay provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code would preclude us from enforcing our remedies against the manager unless relief is first obtained from the court having jurisdiction over the bankruptcy case. In any of these events, we also may be required to fund certain expenses and obligations (e.g., real estate taxes, debt costs and maintenance expenses) to preserve the value of our properties, avoid the imposition of liens on our properties or transition our properties to a new tenant, operator or manager.
Bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings may also result in increased costs to the operator and significant management distraction. If we are unable to transition affected properties, they could experience prolonged operational disruption, leading to lower occupancy rates and further depressed revenues. Publicity about the operator’s financial condition and insolvency

16


proceedings may also negatively impact their and our reputations, decreasing customer demand and revenues. Any or all of these risks could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. These risks would be magnified where we lease multiple properties to a single operator under a master lease, as an operator failure or default under a master lease would expose us to these risks across multiple properties.
We have rights to terminate our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise in whole or with respect to specific properties under certain circumstances, and we may be unable to replace Atria or Sunrise if our management agreements are terminated or not renewed.
We are parties to long-term management agreements pursuant to which Atria and Sunrise, collectively, provided comprehensive property management and accounting services with respect to 273 of our seniors housing communities as of December 31, 2017. Most of our management agreements with Atria have terms expiring either July 31, 2024 or December 31, 2027, with successive automatic ten-year renewal periods, and our management agreements with Sunrise have terms ranging from 25 to 30 years (which commenced as early as 2004 and as recently as 2012). Our ability to terminate these long-term management agreements is limited to specific circumstances set forth in the agreements and may relate to all properties or a specific property or group of properties.
We may terminate any of our Atria management agreements upon the occurrence of an event of default by Atria in the performance of a material covenant or term thereof (including, in certain circumstances, the revocation of any license or certificate necessary for operation), subject in most cases to Atria’s right to cure such default, or upon the occurrence of certain insolvency events relating to Atria. In addition, we may terminate our management agreements with Atria based on the failure to achieve certain NOI targets or upon the payment of a fee.
Similarly, we may terminate any of our Sunrise management agreements upon the occurrence of an event of default by Sunrise in the performance of a material covenant or term thereof (including, in certain circumstances, the revocation of any license or certificate necessary for operation), subject in most cases to Sunrise’s right to cure such default, or upon the occurrence of certain insolvency events relating to Sunrise. We also may terminate most of our management agreements with Sunrise based on the failure to achieve certain NOI targets or to comply with certain expense control covenants, subject to certain rights of Sunrise to make cure payments to us, and upon the occurrence of certain other events or the existence of certain other conditions.
We continually monitor and assess our contractual rights and remedies under our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise. When determining whether to pursue any existing or future rights or remedies under those agreements, including termination rights, we consider numerous factors, including legal, contractual, regulatory, business and other relevant considerations. In the event that we exercise our rights to terminate the Atria or Sunrise management agreements for any reason or such agreements are not renewed upon expiration of their terms, we would attempt to reposition the affected properties with another manager. Although we believe that many qualified national and regional seniors housing operators would be interested in managing our seniors housing communities, we cannot assure you that we would be able to locate another suitable manager or, if we are successful in locating such a manager, that it would manage the properties effectively. Moreover, the transition to a replacement manager would require approval by the applicable regulatory authorities and, in most cases, the mortgage lenders for the properties, and we cannot assure you that such approvals would be granted on a timely basis, if at all. Any inability to replace, or a lengthy delay in replacing, Atria or Sunrise as the manager of our seniors housing communities following termination or non-renewal of the applicable management agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
If we must replace any of our tenants or operators, we might be unable to reposition the properties on as favorable terms, or at all, and we could be subject to delays, limitations and expenses, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
We cannot predict whether our tenants will renew existing leases beyond their current term. If our leases with Brookdale Senior Living or Ardent, the Kindred master leases or any of our other triple-net leases are not renewed, we would attempt to reposition those properties with another tenant or operator. In case of non-renewal, we generally have one year prior to expiration of the lease term to arrange for repositioning of the properties and our tenants are required to continue to perform all of their obligations (including the payment of all rental amounts) for the non-renewed assets until such expiration. However, following expiration of a lease term or if we exercise our right to replace a tenant or operator in default, rental payments on the related properties could decline or cease altogether while we reposition the properties with a suitable replacement tenant or operator. We also might not be successful in identifying suitable replacements or entering into leases or other arrangements with new tenants or operators on a timely basis or on terms as favorable to us as our current leases, if at all, and we may be required to fund certain expenses and obligations (e.g., real estate taxes, debt costs and maintenance expenses) to preserve the value of, and avoid the imposition of liens on, our properties while they are being repositioned. In addition, we may incur certain obligations and liabilities, including obligations to indemnify the replacement tenant or operator, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

17


In the event of non-renewal or a tenant default, our ability to reposition our properties with a suitable replacement tenant or operator could be significantly delayed or limited by state licensing, receivership, CON or other laws, as well as by the Medicare and Medicaid change-of-ownership rules, and we could incur substantial additional expenses in connection with any licensing, receivership or change-of-ownership proceedings. Our ability to locate and attract suitable replacement tenants also could be impaired by the specialized healthcare uses or contractual restrictions on use of the properties, and we may be forced to spend substantial amounts to adapt the properties to other uses. Any such delays, limitations and expenses could adversely impact our ability to collect rent, obtain possession of leased properties or otherwise exercise remedies for tenant default and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Moreover, in connection with certain of our properties, we have entered into intercreditor agreements with the tenants’ lenders or tri-party agreements with our lenders. Our ability to exercise remedies under the applicable leases or management agreements or to reposition the applicable properties may be significantly delayed or limited by the terms of the intercreditor agreement or tri-party agreement. Any such delay or limit on our rights and remedies could adversely affect our ability to mitigate our losses and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Merger and acquisition activity or consolidation in the seniors housing and healthcare industries resulting in a change of control of, or a competitor’s investment in, one or more of our tenants, operators or managers could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
The seniors housing and healthcare industries have recently experienced increased consolidation, including among owners of real estate and care providers. We compete with other healthcare REITs, healthcare providers, healthcare lenders, real estate partnerships, banks, insurance companies, private equity firms and other investors that pursue a variety of investments, which may include investments in our tenants, operators or managers. A competitor’s investment in one of our tenants, operators or managers could enable our competitor to influence that tenant’s, operator’s or manager’s business and strategy in a manner that impairs our relationship with the tenant, operator or manager or is otherwise adverse to our interests. Depending on our contractual agreements and the specific facts and circumstances, we may have the right to consent to, or otherwise exercise rights and remedies, including termination rights, on account of, a competitor’s investment in, a change of control of, or other transactions impacting a tenant, operator or manager. In deciding whether to exercise our rights and remedies, including termination rights, we assess numerous factors, including legal, contractual, regulatory, business and other relevant considerations. In addition, in connection with any change of control of a tenant, operator or manager, the tenant’s, operator’s or manager’s management team may change, which could lead to a change in the tenant’s, operator’s or manager’s strategy or adversely affect the business of the tenant, operator or manager, either of which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Market conditions, including, but not limited to, interest rates and credit spreads, the availability of credit and the actual and perceived state of the real estate markets and public capital markets generally could negatively impact our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
The markets in which we operate are affected by a number of factors that are largely beyond our control but may nevertheless have a significant negative impact on us. These factors include, but are not limited to:
Interest rates and credit spreads; 
The availability of credit, including the price, terms and conditions under which it can be obtained; and
The actual and perceived state of the real estate market, the market for dividend-paying stocks and public capital markets in general.
In addition, increased inflation may have a pronounced negative impact on the interest expense we pay in connection with our outstanding indebtedness and our general and administrative expenses, as these costs could increase at a rate higher than our rents.
Deflation may result in a decline in general price levels, often caused by a decrease in the supply of money or credit. The predominant effects of deflation are high unemployment, credit contraction and weakened consumer demand. Restricted lending practices may impact our ability to obtain financing for our properties, which could adversely impact our growth and profitability.
Our ongoing strategy depends, in part, upon future investments in and acquisitions of, or our development or redevelopment of, seniors housing and healthcare assets, and we may not be successful in identifying and consummating these transactions.
An important part of our business strategy is to continue to expand and diversify our portfolio through accretive acquisition, investment, development and redevelopment opportunities in domestic and international seniors housing and healthcare properties. Our execution of this strategy by successfully identifying, securing and consummating beneficial transactions is made more challenging by increased competition and can be affected by many factors, including our

18


relationships with current and prospective clients, our ability to obtain debt and equity capital at costs comparable to or better than our competitors and lower than the yield we earn on our acquisitions or investments, and our ability to negotiate favorable terms with property owners seeking to sell and other contractual counterparties. Our competitors for these opportunities include other healthcare REITs, real estate partnerships, healthcare providers, healthcare lenders and other investors, including developers, banks, insurance companies, pension funds, government-sponsored entities and private equity firms, some of whom may have greater financial resources and lower costs of capital than we do. See “Business—Competition” included in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If we are unsuccessful at identifying and capitalizing on investment, acquisition, development and redevelopment opportunities, our growth and profitability may be adversely affected.
Investments in and acquisitions of seniors housing and healthcare properties entail risks associated with real estate investments generally, including risks that the investment will not achieve expected returns, that the cost estimates for necessary property improvements will prove inaccurate or that the tenant, operator or manager will fail to meet performance expectations. Investments outside the United States raise legal, economic and market risks associated with doing business in foreign countries, such as currency exchange fluctuations, costly regulatory requirements and foreign tax risks. Domestic and international real estate development and redevelopment projects present additional risks, including construction delays or cost overruns that increase expenses, the inability to obtain required zoning, occupancy and other governmental approvals and permits on a timely basis, and the incurrence of significant costs prior to completion of the project. Furthermore, healthcare properties are often highly customized and the development or redevelopment of such properties may require costly tenant-specific improvements. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will achieve the economic benefit we expect from acquisition, investment, development and redevelopment opportunities.
Our significant acquisition and investment activity presents certain risks to our business and operations.
We have made and expect to continue to make significant acquisitions and investments as part of our overall business strategy. Our significant acquisition and investment activity presents certain risks to our business and operations, including, among other things, that:
We may be unable to successfully integrate the operations, personnel or systems of acquired companies, maintain consistent standards, controls, policies and procedures, or realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions and other investments within the anticipated time frame or at all;
We may be unable to effectively monitor and manage our expanded portfolio of properties, retain key employees or attract highly qualified new employees;
Projections of estimated future revenues, costs savings or operating metrics that we develop during the due diligence and integration planning process might be inaccurate;
Our leverage could increase or our per share financial results could decline if we incur additional debt or issue equity securities to finance acquisitions and investments;
Acquisitions and other new investments could divert management’s attention from our existing assets;
The value of acquired assets or the market price of our common stock may decline; and
We may be unable to continue paying dividends at the current rate.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to integrate acquisitions and investments without encountering difficulties or that any such difficulties will not have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
If the liabilities we assume in connection with acquisitions, including indemnification obligations in favor of third parties, are greater than expected, or if there are unknown liabilities, our business could be materially and adversely affected.
We may assume or incur liabilities in connection with our acquisitions, including, in some cases, contingent liabilities. As we integrate these acquisitions, we may learn additional information about the sellers, the properties, their operations and their liabilities that adversely affects us, such as:
Liabilities relating to the clean-up or remediation of undisclosed environmental conditions;
Unasserted claims of vendors or other persons dealing with the sellers;
Liabilities, claims and litigation, including indemnification obligations, whether or not incurred in the ordinary course of business, relating to periods prior to or following our acquisition;
Claims for indemnification by general partners, directors, officers and others indemnified by the sellers; and
Liabilities for taxes relating to periods prior to our acquisition.

19


As a result, we cannot assure you that our past or future acquisitions will be successful or will not, in fact, harm our business. Among other things, if the liabilities we assume in connection with acquisitions are greater than expected, or if we discover obligations relating to the acquired properties or businesses of which we were not aware at the time of acquisition, our business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
In addition, we have now, and may have in the future, certain surviving indemnification obligations in favor of third parties under the terms of acquisition agreements to which we are a party.  Most of these indemnification obligations will be capped as to amount and survival period, and we do not believe that these obligations will be material in the aggregate.  However, there can be no assurances as to the ultimate amount of such obligations or whether such obligations will have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Our future results will suffer if we do not effectively manage the expansion of our hospital and life science portfolios and operations following the acquisition of AHS and the Life Sciences Acquisition.

As a result of our acquisition of Ardent Medical Services, Inc. (“AHS”) in 2015, we entered into the general acute care hospital sector. Also, as a result of the acquisition of substantially all of the university affiliated life science real estate assets of Wexford Science & Technology, LLC (“Wexford”) in 2016 (the “Life Sciences Acquisition”), we entered into the university-affiliated life science sector. Part of our long-term business strategy involves expanding our hospital and life science portfolios through additional acquisitions and development of new properties. Both the asset management of our existing general acute care hospital and university-affiliated life science and innovation centers portfolios and such additional acquisitions and developments may involve complex challenges. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to manage our expansion opportunities, integrate new investments into our existing business in an efficient and timely manner, successfully monitor the operations, costs, regulatory compliance and service quality of our operators and leverage our relationships with Ardent and other operators of hospitals and Wexford and other operators and developers of life science and innovation centers. It is possible that our expansion or acquisition opportunities within the general acute care hospital and life science sectors will not be successful, which could adversely impact our growth and future results.
Our investments are concentrated in seniors housing and healthcare real estate, making us more vulnerable economically to adverse changes in the real estate market and the seniors housing and healthcare industries than if our investments were diversified.
We invest primarily in seniors housing and healthcare properties and are constrained by the terms of our existing indebtedness from making investments outside those industries. This investment focus exposes us to greater economic risk than if our portfolio were to include real estate assets in other industries or assets unrelated to real estate.
The healthcare industry is highly regulated, and changes in government regulation and reimbursement can have material adverse consequences on its participants, some of which may be unintended. The healthcare industry is also highly competitive, and our operators and managers may encounter increased competition for residents and patients, including with respect to the scope and quality of care and services provided, reputation and financial condition, physical appearance of the properties, price and location. Our tenants, operators and managers are large employers who compete for labor, making their results sensitive to changes in the labor market and/or wages and benefits offered to their employees. If our tenants, operators and managers are unable to successfully compete with other operators and managers by maintaining profitable occupancy and rate levels or controlling labor costs, their ability to meet their respective obligations to us may be materially adversely affected. We cannot assure you that future changes in government regulation will not adversely affect the healthcare industry, including our seniors housing and healthcare operations, tenants and operators, nor can we be certain that our tenants, operators and managers will achieve and maintain occupancy and rate levels or labor costs levels that will enable them to satisfy their obligations to us. Any adverse changes in the regulation of the healthcare industry, or the competitiveness of our tenants, operators and managers, or costs of labor, could have a more pronounced effect on us than if we had investments outside the seniors housing and healthcare industries.
Real estate investments are relatively illiquid, and our ability to quickly sell or exchange our properties in response to changes in economic or other conditions is limited. In the event we market any of our properties for sale, the value of those properties and our ability to sell at prices or on terms acceptable to us could be adversely affected by a downturn in the real estate industry or any economic weakness in the seniors housing and healthcare industries. In addition, transfers of healthcare properties may be subject to regulatory approvals that are not required for transfers of other types of commercial properties. We cannot assure you that we will recognize the full value of any property that we sell for liquidity or other reasons, and the inability to respond quickly to changes in the performance of our investments could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

20


Our operating assets expose us to various operational risks, liabilities and claims that could adversely affect our ability to generate revenues or increase our costs and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Our senior living operating assets and office assets expose us to various operational risks, liabilities and claims that could increase our costs or adversely affect our ability to generate revenues, thereby reducing our profitability. These operational risks include fluctuations in occupancy levels, the inability to achieve economic resident fees (including anticipated increases in those fees), increases in the cost of food, materials, energy, labor (as a result of unionization or otherwise) or other services, rent control regulations, national and regional economic conditions, the imposition of new or increased taxes, capital expenditure requirements, professional and general liability claims, and the availability and cost of professional and general liability insurance. Any one or a combination of these factors could result in operating deficiencies in our senior living operations or office operations reportable business segments, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Our ownership of properties outside the United States exposes us to different risks than those associated with our domestic properties.
Our current or future ownership of properties outside the United States subjects us to risks that may be different or greater than those we face with our domestic properties. These risks include, but are not limited to:
Challenges with respect to repatriation of foreign earnings and cash;
Foreign ownership restrictions with respect to operations in countries in which we own properties;
Regional or country-specific business cycles and economic instability;
Challenges of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and regulations, including those relating to real estate, corporate governance, operations, taxes, employment and legal proceedings;
Differences in lending practices and the willingness of domestic or foreign lenders to provide financing; and
Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations in the United States that affect foreign operations, including, but not limited to, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
Increased construction and development in the markets in which our seniors housing communities and MOBs are located could adversely affect our future occupancy rates, operating margins and profitability.
Limited barriers to entry in the seniors housing and MOB industries could lead to the development of new seniors housing communities or MOBs that outpaces demand. Data published by the National Investment Center for Seniors Housing & Care has indicated deliveries of new seniors housing communities will remain at elevated levels in 2018, especially in certain geographic markets. If development outpaces demand for those assets in the markets in which our properties are located, those markets may become saturated and we could experience decreased occupancy, reduced operating margins and lower profitability, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
We have now, and may have in the future, exposure to contingent rent escalators, which could hinder our growth and profitability.
We derive a significant portion of our revenues from leasing properties pursuant to long-term triple-net leases that generally provide for fixed rental rates, subject to annual escalations. In certain cases, the annual escalations are contingent upon the achievement of specified revenue parameters or based on changes in CPI, with caps and floors. If, as a result of weak economic conditions or other factors, the properties subject to these leases do not generate sufficient revenue to achieve the specified rent escalation parameters or CPI does not increase, our growth and profitability may be hindered. If strong economic conditions result in significant increases in CPI, but the escalations under our leases are capped, our growth and profitability also may be limited.
We own certain properties subject to ground lease, air rights or other restrictive agreements that limit our uses of the properties, restrict our ability to sell or otherwise transfer the properties and expose us to loss of the properties if such agreements are breached by us or terminated.
Our investments in MOBs and other properties may be made through leasehold interests in the land on which the buildings are located, leases of air rights for the space above the land on which the buildings are located, or other similar restrictive arrangements. Many of these ground lease, air rights and other restrictive agreements impose significant limitations on our uses of the subject properties, restrict our ability to sell or otherwise transfer our interests in the properties or restrict the leasing of the properties. These restrictions may limit our ability to timely sell or exchange the properties, impair the properties’ value or negatively impact our ability to find suitable tenants for the properties. In addition, we could lose our interests in the subject properties if the ground lease, air rights or other restrictive agreements are breached by us or terminated.

21


We may be unable to successfully foreclose on the collateral securing our loans and other investments, and even if we are successful in our foreclosure efforts, we may be unable to successfully sell any acquired equity interests or reposition any acquired properties, which could adversely affect our ability to recover our investments.
If a borrower defaults under mortgage or other secured loans for which we are the lender, we may attempt to foreclose on the collateral securing those loans, including by acquiring any pledged equity interests or acquiring title to the subject properties, to protect our investment. In response, the defaulting borrower may contest our enforcement of foreclosure or other available remedies, seek bankruptcy protection against our exercise of enforcement or other available remedies, or bring claims against us for lender liability. If a defaulting borrower seeks bankruptcy protection, the automatic stay provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code would preclude us from enforcing foreclosure or other available remedies against the borrower unless relief is first obtained from the court with jurisdiction over the bankruptcy case. In addition, we may be subject to intercreditor or tri-party agreements that delay, impact, govern or limit our ability to foreclose on a lien securing a loan or otherwise delay or limit our pursuit of our rights and remedies. Any such delay or limit on our ability to pursue our rights or remedies could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Even if we successfully foreclose on the collateral securing our mortgage loans and other investments, costs related to enforcement of our remedies, high loan-to-value ratios or declines in the value of the collateral could prevent us from realizing the full amount of our secured loans, and we could be required to record a valuation allowance for such losses. Moreover, the collateral may include equity interests that we are unable to sell due to securities law restrictions or otherwise, or properties that we are unable to reposition with new tenants or operators on a timely basis, if at all, or without making improvements or repairs. Any delay or costs incurred in selling or repositioning acquired collateral could adversely affect our ability to recover our investments.
Some of our loan investments are subordinated to loans held by third parties.
Our mezzanine loan investments are subordinated to senior secured loans held by other investors that encumber the same real estate. If a senior secured loan is foreclosed, that foreclosure would extinguish our rights in the collateral for our mezzanine loan. In order to protect our economic interest in that collateral, we would need to be prepared, on an expedited basis, to advance funds to the senior lenders in order to cure defaults under the senior secured loans and prevent such a foreclosure. If a senior secured loan has matured or has been accelerated, then in order to protect our economic interest in the collateral, we would need to be prepared, on an expedited basis, to purchase or pay off that senior secured loan, which could require an infusion of fresh capital as large or larger than our initial investment. Our ability to sell or syndicate a mezzanine loan could be limited by transfer restrictions in the intercreditor agreement with the senior secured lenders. Our ability to negotiate modifications to the mezzanine loan documents with our borrowers could be limited by restrictions on modifications in the intercreditor agreement. Since mezzanine loans are typically secured by pledges of equity rather than direct liens on real estate, our mezzanine loan investments are more vulnerable than our mortgage loan investments to losses caused by competing creditor claims, unauthorized transfers, or bankruptcies.
Our tenants, operators and managers may be adversely affected by healthcare regulation and enforcement.
Regulation of the healthcare industry generally has intensified over time both in the number and type of regulations and in the efforts to enforce those regulations. This is particularly true for large for-profit, multi-facility providers like Atria, Sunrise, Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred. Federal, state and local laws and regulations affecting the healthcare industry include those relating to, among other things, licensure, conduct of operations, ownership of facilities, addition of facilities and equipment, allowable costs, services, prices for services, qualified beneficiaries, quality of care, patient rights, fraudulent or abusive behavior, financial and other arrangements that may be entered into by healthcare providers and the research, development, clinical testing, manufacture and marketing of life science products. In addition, changes in enforcement policies by federal and state governments have resulted in an increase in the number of inspections, citations of regulatory deficiencies and other regulatory sanctions, including terminations from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, bars on Medicare and Medicaid payments for new admissions, civil monetary penalties and even criminal penalties. See “Governmental Regulation—Healthcare Regulation” included in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We are unable to predict the scope of future federal, state and local regulations and legislation, including the Medicare and Medicaid statutes and regulations, or the intensity of enforcement efforts with respect to such regulations and legislation, and any changes in the regulatory framework could have a material adverse effect on our tenants, operators and managers, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
If our tenants, operators and managers fail to comply with the extensive laws, regulations and other requirements applicable to their businesses and the operation of our properties, they could become ineligible to receive reimbursement from governmental and private third-party payor programs, face bans on admissions of new patients or residents, suffer civil or criminal penalties or be required to make significant changes to their operations. Our tenants, operators and managers also

22


could face increased costs related to changes in healthcare regulation, such as the possible repeal of the ACA by the current presidential administration and Republican-controlled Congress and a shift toward less comprehensive health coverage, or be forced to expend considerable resources in responding to an investigation or other enforcement action under applicable laws or regulations. In such event, the results of operations and financial condition of our tenants, operators and managers and the results of operations of our properties operated or managed by those entities could be adversely affected, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Changes in the reimbursement rates or methods of payment from third-party payors, including insurance companies and the Medicare and Medicaid programs, could have a material adverse effect on certain of our tenants and operators and on us.
Certain of our tenants and operators rely on reimbursement from third-party payors, including the Medicare (both traditional Medicare and "managed" Medicare/Medicare Advantage) and Medicaid programs, for substantially all of their revenues. Federal and state legislators and regulators have adopted or proposed various cost-containment measures that would limit payments to healthcare providers, and budget crises and financial shortfalls have caused states to implement or consider Medicaid rate freezes or cuts. See “Governmental Regulation—Healthcare Regulation” included in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Private third-party payors also have continued their efforts to control healthcare costs. In addition, coverage expansions via the ACA through Medicaid expansion and health insurance exchanges may be scaled back as the current presidential administration and some members of Congress lead efforts to repeal and replace the ACA. We cannot assure you that our tenants and operators who currently depend on governmental or private payor reimbursement will be adequately reimbursed for the services they provide. Significant limits by governmental and private third-party payors on the scope of services reimbursed or on reimbursement rates and fees, whether from legislation, administrative actions or private payor efforts, could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity, financial condition and results of operations of certain of our tenants and operators, which could affect adversely their ability to comply with the terms of our leases and have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
The healthcare industry trend away from a traditional fee for service reimbursement model towards value-based payment approaches may negatively impact certain of our tenants’ revenues and profitability
Certain of our tenants, specifically those providers in the post-acute and general acute care hospital space, are subject to the broad trend in the healthcare industry toward value-based purchasing of healthcare services. These value-based purchasing programs include both public reporting of quality data and preventable adverse events tied to the quality and efficiency of care provided by facilities. Medicare and Medicaid require healthcare facilities, including hospitals and skilled nursing facilities, to report certain quality data to receive full reimbursement updates. In addition Medicare does not reimburse for care related to certain preventable adverse events (also called “never events”). Many large commercial payors currently require healthcare facilities to report quality data, and several commercial payors do not reimburse hospitals for certain preventable adverse events.
During the Obama administration, HHS focused on tying Medicare payments to quality or value through alternative payment models, which generally aim to make providers attentive to the total costs of treatment. Examples of alternative payment models include bundled-payment arrangements. It is unclear whether such models will successfully coordinate care and reduce costs or whether they will decrease reimbursement. The value-based purchasing trend is not limited to the public sector. Several of the nation’s largest commercial payors have also expressed an intent to increase reliance on value-based reimbursement arrangements. Further, many large commercial payors require hospitals to report quality data, and several commercial payors do not reimburse hospitals for certain preventable adverse events.
While the current presidential administration’s and some members of Congress’s desire to repeal the ACA creates unpredictability, we expect value-based purchasing programs, including programs that condition reimbursement on patient outcome measures, to become more common and to involve a higher percentage of reimbursement amounts. We are unable at this time to predict how this trend will affect the revenues and profitability of those of our tenants who are providers of healthcare services; however, if this trend significantly and adversely affects their profitability, it could in turn negatively affect their ability and willingness to comply with the terms of their leases with us and or renew those leases upon expiration, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

If controls imposed on certain of our tenants who provide healthcare services that are reimbursed by Medicare, Medicaid and other third-party payors to reduce admissions and length of stay affect inpatient volumes at our healthcare facilities, the financial condition or results of operations of those tenants could be adversely affected.

Controls imposed by Medicare, Medicaid and commercial third-party payors designed to reduce admissions and lengths of stay, commonly referred to as “utilization reviews,” have affected and are expected to continue to affect certain of

23


our healthcare facilities, specifically our acute care hospitals and post-acute facilities. Utilization review entails the review of the admission and course of treatment of a patient by managed care plans. Inpatient utilization, average lengths of stay and occupancy rates continue to be negatively affected by payor-required preadmission authorization and utilization review and by payor pressures to maximize outpatient and alternative healthcare delivery services for less acutely ill patients. Efforts to impose more stringent cost controls and reductions are expected to continue, which could negatively impact the financial condition of our tenants who provide healthcare services in our hospitals and post-acute facilities. If so, this could adversely affect these tenants’ ability and willingness to comply with the terms of their leases with us and or renew those leases upon expiration, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

The implementation of new patient criteria for LTACs will change the basis upon which certain of our tenants are reimbursed by Medicare, which could adversely affect those tenants’ revenues and profitability.
 
As part of the Pathway for SGR Reform Act of 2013 enacted on December 26, 2013, Congress adopted various legislative changes impacting LTACs. These legislative changes create new Medicare criteria and payment rules for LTACs, and could have a material adverse impact on the revenues and profitability of the tenants of our LTACs. This material adverse impact could, in turn, negatively affect those tenants’ ability and willingness to comply with the terms of their leases with us or renew those leases upon expiration, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

The hospitals on or near whose campuses our MOBs are located and their affiliated health systems could fail to remain competitive or financially viable, which could adversely impact their ability to attract physicians and physician groups to our MOBs.
Our MOB operations depend on the competitiveness and financial viability of the hospitals on or near whose campuses our MOBs are located and their ability to attract physicians and other healthcare-related clients to our MOBs. The viability of these hospitals, in turn, depends on factors such as the quality and mix of healthcare services provided, competition for patients, physicians and physician groups, demographic trends in the surrounding community, market position and growth potential, as well as the ability of the affiliated health systems to provide economies of scale and access to capital. If a hospital on or near whose campus one of our MOBs is located fails or becomes unable to meet its financial obligations, and if an affiliated health system is unable to support that hospital, the hospital may be unable to compete successfully or could be forced to close or relocate, which could adversely impact its ability to attract physicians and other healthcare-related clients. Because we rely on proximity to and affiliations with hospitals to create leasing demand in our MOBs, a hospital’s inability to remain competitive or financially viable, or to attract physicians and physician groups, could materially adversely affect our MOB operations and have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Our development and redevelopment projects, including projects undertaken through our joint ventures, may not yield anticipated returns.
We consider and, when appropriate, invest in various development and redevelopment projects. In deciding whether to make an investment in a particular project, we make certain assumptions regarding the expected future performance of the property. Our assumptions are subject to risks generally associated with development and redevelopment projects, including, among others, that:
We may be unable to obtain financing for the project on favorable terms or at all;
We may not complete the project on schedule or within budgeted amounts;
We may encounter delays in obtaining or fail to obtain all necessary zoning, land use, building, occupancy, environmental and other governmental permits and authorizations, or underestimate the costs necessary to develop or redevelop the property to market standards;
Construction or other delays may provide tenants or residents the right to terminate preconstruction leases or cause us to incur additional costs;
Volatility in the price of construction materials or labor may increase our project costs;
In the case of our MOB developments, hospitals or health systems may maintain significant decision-making authority with respect to the development schedule;
Our builders may fail to perform or satisfy the expectations of our clients or prospective clients;
We may incorrectly forecast risks associated with development in new geographic regions;
Tenants may not lease space at the quantity or rental rate levels or on the schedule projected;
Demand for our project may decrease prior to completion, due to competition from other developments; and

24


Lease rates and rents at newly developed or redeveloped properties may fluctuate based on factors beyond our control, including market and economic conditions.
If any of the risks described above occur, our development and redevelopment projects, including projects undertaken through our joint ventures, may not yield anticipated returns, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Our investments in joint ventures and unconsolidated entities could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority, our reliance on our joint venture partners’ financial condition, any disputes that may arise between us and our joint venture partners, and our exposure to potential losses from the actions of our joint venture partners.
As of December 31, 2017, we owned 48 MOBs, 11 life science and innovation centers, nine seniors housing communities and one IRF through consolidated joint ventures, and we had 25% ownership interests in 17 seniors housing communities, 13 SNFs and one MOB through investments in unconsolidated entities. In addition, we had a 34% ownership interest in Atria and a 9.9% interest in Ardent as of December 31, 2017. These joint ventures and unconsolidated entities involve risks not present with respect to our wholly owned properties, including the following:
We may be unable to take actions that are opposed by our joint venture partners under arrangements that require us to share decision-making authority over major decisions affecting the ownership or operation of the joint venture and any property owned by the joint venture, such as the sale or financing of the property or the making of additional capital contributions for the benefit of the property;
For joint ventures in which we have a noncontrolling interest, our joint venture partners may take actions that we oppose;
Our ability to sell or transfer our interest in a joint venture to a third party may be restricted if we fail to obtain the prior consent of our joint venture partners;
Our joint venture partners may become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions, which could delay construction or development of a property or increase our financial commitment to the joint venture;
Our joint venture partners may have business interests or goals with respect to a property that conflict with our business interests and goals, including with respect to the timing, terms and strategies for investment, which could increase the likelihood of disputes regarding the ownership, management or disposition of the property;
Disagreements with our joint venture partners could result in litigation or arbitration that increases our expenses, distracts our officers and directors, and disrupts the day-to-day operations of the property, including by delaying important decisions until the dispute is resolved; and
We may suffer losses as a result of actions taken by our joint venture partners with respect to our joint venture investments.
Events that adversely affect the ability of seniors and their families to afford daily resident fees at our seniors housing communities could cause our occupancy rates, resident fee revenues and results of operations to decline.
Assisted and independent living services generally are not reimbursable under government reimbursement programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. A large majority of the resident fee revenues generated by our senior living operations, therefore, are derived from private pay sources consisting of the income or assets of residents or their family members. In light of the significant expense associated with building new properties and staffing and other costs of providing services, typically only seniors with income or assets that meet or exceed the comparable region median can afford the daily resident and care fees at our seniors housing communities, and a weak economy, depressed housing market or changes in demographics could adversely affect their continued ability to do so. If the managers of our seniors housing communities are unable to attract and retain seniors that have sufficient income, assets or other resources to pay the fees associated with assisted and independent living services, the occupancy rates, resident fee revenues and results of operations of our senior living operations could decline, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Our tenants in the life science industry face high levels of regulation, expense and uncertainty.
Life science tenants, particularly those involved in developing and marketing pharmaceutical products, are subject to certain unique risks, including the following:
Some of our tenants require significant outlays of funds for the research and development and clinical testing of their products and technologies. The economic environment in recent years has significantly impacted the ability of these companies to access the capital markets and venture capital funding. In addition, state and federal government and university budgets have been negatively impacted by the recent economic environment and, as a result certain

25


programs, including grants related to biotechnology research and development, may be at risk of being eliminated or cut back significantly. If private investors, the government, universities, public markets or other sources of funding are unavailable to support such development, a tenant’s business may fail.

The research and development, clinical testing, manufacture and marketing of some of our tenants’ products require federal, state and foreign regulatory approvals. The approval process is typically long, expensive and uncertain. Even if our tenants have sufficient funds to seek approvals, one or all of their products may fail to obtain the required regulatory approvals on a timely basis or at all. Furthermore, our tenants may only have a small number of products under development. If one product fails to receive the required approvals at any stage of development, it could significantly adversely affect our tenant’s entire business and its ability to pay rent.

Our tenants may be unable to adequately protect their intellectual property under patent, copyright or trade secret laws. Failure to do so could jeopardize their ability to profit from their efforts and to protect their products from competition.

Collaborative relationships with other life science entities may be crucial to the development, manufacturing, distribution or marketing of our tenants’ products. If these other entities fail to fulfill their obligations under these collaborative arrangements, our tenants’ businesses will suffer.

Legislation to reform the U.S. healthcare system, including regulations and legislation relating to the ACA, may include government intervention in product pricing and other changes that adversely affect reimbursement for our tenants’ marketable products. In addition, sales of many of our tenants’ marketable products are dependent, in large part, on the availability and extent of reimbursement from government health administration authorities, private health insurers and other organizations. Changes in government regulations, price controls or third-party payors’ reimbursement policies may reduce reimbursement for our tenants’ marketable products and adversely impact our tenants’ businesses.

We cannot assure you that our tenants in the life science industry will be successful in their businesses. If our tenants’ businesses are adversely affected, they may have difficulty making payments to us, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The amount and scope of insurance coverage provided by our policies and policies maintained by our tenants, operators and managers may not adequately insure against losses.
We maintain or require in our lease, management and other agreements that our tenants, operators and managers maintain all applicable lines of insurance on our properties and their operations. Although we regularly review the amount and scope of insurance provided by our policies and required to be maintained by our tenants, operators and managers and believe the coverage provided to be customary for similarly situated companies in our industry, we cannot assure you that we or our tenants, operators and managers will continue to be able to maintain adequate levels of insurance. We also cannot assure you that we or our tenants, operators and managers will maintain the required coverages, that we will continue to require the same levels of insurance under our lease, management and other agreements, that such insurance will be available at a reasonable cost in the future or that the policies maintained will fully cover all losses on our properties upon the occurrence of a catastrophic event, nor can we make any guaranty as to the future financial viability of the insurers that underwrite our policies and the policies maintained by our tenants, operators and managers.
For various reasons, including to reduce and manage costs, many healthcare companies utilize different organizational and corporate structures coupled with self-insurance trusts or captive programs that may provide less insurance coverage than a traditional insurance policy. Companies that insure any part of their general and professional liability risks through their own captive limited purpose entities generally estimate the future cost of general and professional liability through actuarial studies that rely primarily on historical data. However, due to the rise in the number and severity of professional claims against healthcare providers, these actuarial studies may underestimate the future cost of claims, and reserves for future claims may not be adequate to cover the actual cost of those claims. As a result, the tenants and operators of our properties who self-insure could incur large funded and unfunded general and professional liability expenses, which could materially adversely affect their liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and, in turn, their ability to satisfy their obligations to us. If we or the managers of our senior living operations decide to implement a captive or self-insurance program, any large funded and unfunded general and professional liability expenses incurred could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur, we could incur substantial liability or lose all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenues from the property. Following the occurrence of such an event, we might nevertheless remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations

26


related to the property. We cannot assure you that material uninsured losses, or losses in excess of insurance proceeds, will not occur in the future.
Significant legal actions or regulatory proceedings could subject us or our tenants, operators and managers to increased operating costs and substantial uninsured liabilities, which could materially adversely affect our or their liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.
From time to time, we may be subject to claims brought against us in lawsuits and other legal or regulatory proceedings arising out of our alleged actions or the alleged actions of our tenants, operators and managers for which such tenants, operators and managers may have agreed to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless. An unfavorable resolution of any such litigation or proceeding could materially adversely affect our or their liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
In certain cases, we and our tenants, operators and managers may be subject to professional liability claims brought by plaintiffs’ attorneys seeking significant punitive damages and attorneys’ fees. Due to the historically high frequency and severity of professional liability claims against seniors housing and healthcare providers, the availability of professional liability insurance has decreased and the premiums on such insurance coverage remain costly. As a result, insurance protection against such claims may not be sufficient to cover all claims against us or our tenants, operators or managers, and may not be available at a reasonable cost. If we or our tenants, operators and managers are unable to maintain adequate insurance coverage or are required to pay punitive damages, we or they may be exposed to substantial liabilities.
The occurrence of cyber incidents could disrupt our operations, result in the loss of confidential information and/or damage our business relationships and reputation.
As our reliance on technology has increased, our business is subject to greater risk from cyber incidents, including attempts to gain unauthorized access to our or our managers’ systems to disrupt operations, corrupt data or steal confidential information, and other electronic security breaches.  While we and our managers have implemented measures to help mitigate these threats, such measures cannot guarantee that we will be successful in preventing a cyber incident.  The occurrence of a cyber incident could disrupt our operations, or the operations of our managers, compromise the confidential information of our employees or the residents in our seniors housing communities, and/or damage our business relationships and reputation.
Our operators may be sued under a federal whistleblower statute.
Our operators who engage in business with the federal government may be sued under a federal whistleblower statute designed to combat fraud and abuse in the healthcare industry. See “Governmental Regulation—Healthcare Regulation” included in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These lawsuits can involve significant monetary damages and award bounties to private plaintiffs who successfully bring these suits. If any of these lawsuits were brought against our operators, such suits combined with increased operating costs and substantial uninsured liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our operators’ liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and on their ability to satisfy their obligations under our leases, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
We could incur substantial liabilities and costs if any of our properties are found to be contaminated with hazardous substances or we become involved in any environmental disputes.
Under federal and state environmental laws and regulations, a current or former owner of real property may be liable for costs related to the investigation, removal and remediation of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum that are released from or are present at or under, or that are disposed of in connection with such property. Owners of real property may also face other environmental liabilities, including government fines and penalties imposed by regulatory authorities and damages for injuries to persons, property or natural resources. Environmental laws and regulations often impose liability without regard to whether the owner was aware of, or was responsible for, the presence, release or disposal of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum. In certain circumstances, environmental liability may result from the activities of a current or former operator of the property. Although we generally have indemnification rights against the current operators of our properties for contamination caused by them, such indemnification may not adequately cover all environmental costs. See “Governmental Regulation—Environmental Regulation” included in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to attract and retain talented employees, and the loss of any one of our key personnel could adversely impact our business.
The success of our business depends, in part, on the leadership and performance of our executive management team and key employees, and our ability to attract, retain and motivate talented employees could significantly impact our future performance. Competition for these individuals is intense, and we cannot assure you that we will retain our key officers and

27


employees or that we will be able to attract and retain other highly qualified individuals in the future. Losing any one or more of these persons could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Failure to maintain effective internal controls could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are required to provide a report by management on internal control over financial reporting, including management’s assessment of the effectiveness of such control. Because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls, or fraud, effective internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatement and can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls over financial reporting and our operating internal controls, including any failure to implement required new or improved controls as a result of changes to our business or otherwise, or if we experience difficulties in their implementation, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely harmed and we could fail to meet our reporting obligations.
Economic and other conditions that negatively affect geographic locations to which a greater percentage of our NOI is attributed could adversely affect our financial results.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, approximately 35.6% of our total NOI was derived from properties located in California (13.9%), Texas (6.4%), New York (5.7%), Illinois (5.1%) and Florida (4.5%). As a result, we are subject to increased exposure to adverse conditions affecting these regions, including downturns in the local economies or changes in local real estate conditions, increased construction and competition or decreased demand for our properties, regional climate events and changes in state-specific legislation, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We may be adversely affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
Our ownership of properties in Canada and the United Kingdom currently subjects us to fluctuations in the exchange rates between U.S. dollars and Canadian dollars or the British pound, which may, from time to time, impact our financial condition and results of operations. If we continue to expand our international presence through investments in, or acquisitions or development of, seniors housing or healthcare assets outside the United States, Canada or the United Kingdom, we may transact business in other foreign currencies. Although we may pursue hedging alternatives, including borrowing in local currencies, to protect against foreign currency fluctuations, we cannot assure you that such fluctuations will not have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
Risks Arising from Our Capital Structure
We may become more leveraged.
As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $11.3 billion of outstanding indebtedness. The instruments governing our existing indebtedness permit us to incur substantial additional debt, including secured debt, and we may satisfy our capital and liquidity needs through additional borrowings. A high level of indebtedness would require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payment of debt service, thereby reducing the funds available to implement our business strategy and make distributions to stockholders. A high level of indebtedness could also have the following consequences:
Potential limits on our ability to adjust rapidly to changing market conditions and vulnerability in the event of a downturn in general economic conditions or in the real estate or healthcare industries;
Potential impairment of our ability to obtain additional financing to execute on our business strategy; and
Potential downgrade in the rating of our debt securities by one or more rating agencies, which could have the effect of, among other things, limiting our access to capital and increasing our cost of borrowing.
In addition, from time to time, we mortgage certain of our properties to secure payment of indebtedness. If we are unable to meet our mortgage payments, then the encumbered properties could be foreclosed upon or transferred to the mortgagee with a resulting loss of income and asset value.
We are exposed to increases in interest rates, which could reduce our profitability and adversely impact our ability to refinance existing debt, sell assets or engage in acquisition, investment, development and redevelopment activity, and our decision to hedge against interest rate risk might not be effective.
We receive a significant portion of our revenues by leasing assets under long-term triple-net leases that generally provide for fixed rental rates subject to annual escalations, while certain of our debt obligations are floating rate obligations with interest and related payments that vary with the movement of LIBOR, Bankers’ Acceptance or other indexes. The

28


generally fixed rate nature of a significant portion of our revenues and the variable rate nature of certain of our debt obligations create interest rate risk. Although our operating assets provide a partial hedge against interest rate fluctuations, if interest rates rise, the costs of our existing floating rate debt and any new debt that we incur would increase. These increased costs could reduce our profitability, impair our ability to meet our debt obligations, or increase the cost of financing our acquisition, investment, development and redevelopment activity. An increase in interest rates also could limit our ability to refinance existing debt upon maturity or cause us to pay higher rates upon refinancing, as well as decrease the amount that third parties are willing to pay for our assets, thereby limiting our ability to promptly reposition our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions.
We may seek to manage our exposure to interest rate volatility with hedging arrangements that involve additional risks, including the risks that counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements, that these arrangements may not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes, that the amount of income we earn from hedging transactions may be limited by federal tax provisions governing REITs, and that these arrangements may cause us to pay higher interest rates on our debt obligations than otherwise would be the case. Moreover, no amount of hedging activity can fully insulate us from the risks associated with changes in interest rates. Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate risk, if we choose to engage in such activities, could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Limitations on our ability to access capital could have an adverse effect on our ability to make required payments on our debt obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to raise the capital necessary to meet our debt service obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy, if our cash flow from operations is insufficient to satisfy these needs, and the failure to do so could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. Although we believe that we have sufficient access to capital and other sources of funding to meet our expected liquidity needs, we cannot assure you that conditions in the capital markets will not deteriorate or that our access to capital and other sources of funding will not become constrained, which could adversely affect the availability and terms of future borrowings, renewals or refinancings and our results of operation and financial condition. If we cannot access capital at an acceptable cost or at all, we may be required to liquidate one or more investments in properties at times that may not permit us to maximize the return on those investments or that could result in adverse tax consequences to us.
As a public company, our access to debt and equity capital depends, in part, on the trading prices of our senior notes and common stock, which, in turn, depend upon market conditions that change from time to time, such as the market’s perception of our financial condition, our growth potential and our current and expected future earnings and cash distributions. Our failure to meet the market’s expectation with regard to future earnings and cash distributions or a significant downgrade in the ratings assigned to our long-term debt could impact our ability to access capital or increase our borrowing costs. We also rely on the financial institutions that are parties to our revolving credit facilities. If these institutions become capital constrained, tighten their lending standards or become insolvent or if they experience excessive volumes of borrowing requests from other borrowers within a short period of time, they may be unable or unwilling to honor their funding commitments to us, which would adversely affect our ability to draw on our revolving credit facilities and, over time, could negatively impact our ability to consummate acquisitions, repay indebtedness as it matures, fund capital expenditures or make distributions to our stockholders.
Covenants in the instruments governing our and our subsidiaries’ existing indebtedness limit our operational flexibility, and a covenant breach could materially adversely affect our operations.
The terms of the instruments governing our existing indebtedness require us to comply with certain customary financial and other covenants, such as maintaining debt service coverage, leverage ratios and minimum net worth requirements. Our continued ability to incur additional debt and to conduct business in general is subject to our compliance with these covenants, which limit our operational flexibility. Breaches of these covenants could result in defaults under the applicable debt instruments and could trigger defaults under any of our other indebtedness that is cross-defaulted against such instruments, even if we satisfy our payment obligations. In addition, covenants contained in the instruments governing our subsidiaries’ outstanding mortgage indebtedness may restrict our ability to obtain cash distributions from such subsidiaries for the purpose of meeting our debt service obligations. Financial and other covenants that limit our operational flexibility, as well as defaults resulting from our breach of any of these covenants, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

29


Risks Arising from Our Status as a REIT
Loss of our status as a REIT would have significant adverse consequences for us and the value of our common stock.
If we lose our status as a REIT (currently or with respect to any tax years for which the statute of limitations has not expired), we will face serious tax consequences that will substantially reduce the funds available to satisfy our obligations, to implement our business strategy and to make distributions to our stockholders for each of the years involved because:
We would not be allowed a deduction for distributions to stockholders in computing our taxable income and would be subject to regular U.S. federal corporate income tax;
We could be subject to increased state and local taxes; and
Unless we are entitled to relief under statutory provisions, we could not elect to be subject to tax as a REIT for four taxable years following the year during which we were disqualified.
In addition, in such event we would no longer be required to pay dividends to maintain REIT status, which could adversely affect the value of our common stock.
Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations. The determination of factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control, as well as new legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions, may adversely affect our investors or our ability to remain qualified as a REIT for tax purposes. In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must satisfy a number of requirements, generally including requirements regarding the ownership of our stock, requirements regarding the composition of our assets, a requirement that at least 95% of our gross income in any year must be derived from qualifying sources, and we must make distributions to our stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% of our net taxable income, excluding capital gains. Although we believe that we currently qualify as a REIT, we cannot assure you that we will continue to qualify for all future periods.
The 90% distribution requirement will decrease our liquidity and may limit our ability to engage in otherwise beneficial transactions.
To comply with the 90% distribution requirement applicable to REITs and to avoid the nondeductible excise tax, we must make distributions to our stockholders. Such distributions reduce the funds we have available to finance our investment, acquisition, development and redevelopment activity and may limit our ability to engage in transactions that are otherwise in the best interests of our stockholders.
Although we do not anticipate any inability to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement, from time to time, we may not have sufficient cash or other liquid assets to do so. For example, timing differences between the actual receipt of income and actual payment of deductible expenses, on the one hand, and the inclusion of that income and deduction of those expenses in arriving at our taxable income, on the other hand, or non-deductible expenses such as principal amortization or repayments or capital expenditures in excess of non-cash deductions may prevent us from having sufficient cash or liquid assets to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement.
In the event that timing differences occur or we decide to retain cash or to distribute such greater amount as may be necessary to avoid income and excise taxation, we may seek to borrow funds, issue additional equity securities, pay taxable stock dividends, distribute other property or securities or engage in a transaction intended to enable us to meet the REIT distribution requirements. Any of these actions may require us to raise additional capital to meet our obligations; however, see “Risks Arising from Our Capital Structure—Limitations on our ability to access capital could have an adverse effect on our ability to make required payments on our debt obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy.” The terms of the instruments governing our existing indebtedness restrict our ability to engage in certain of these transactions.
To preserve our qualification as a REIT, our certificate of incorporation contains ownership limits with respect to our capital stock that may delay, defer or prevent a change of control of our company.
To assist us in preserving our qualification as a REIT, our certificate of incorporation provides that if a person acquires beneficial ownership of more than 9.0% of our outstanding common stock or more than 9.9% of our outstanding preferred stock, the shares that are beneficially owned in excess of the applicable limit are considered “excess shares” and are automatically deemed transferred to a trust for the benefit of a charitable institution or other qualifying organization selected by our Board of Directors. The trust is entitled to all dividends with respect to the excess shares and the trustee may exercise all voting power over the excess shares. In addition, we have the right to purchase the excess shares for a price equal to the lesser

30


of (i) the price per share in the transaction that created the excess shares or (ii) the market price on the day we purchase the shares, but if we do not purchase the excess shares, the trustee of the trust is required to transfer the shares at the direction of our Board of Directors. These ownership limits could delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.
Our use of TRSs is limited under the Code.

Under the Code, no more than 20% of the value of the gross assets of a REIT may be represented by securities of one or more TRSs. This limitation may affect our ability to increase the size of our TRSs’ operations and assets, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the applicable limitation, or that such compliance will not adversely affect our business. Also, our TRSs may not, among other things, operate or manage certain health care facilities, which may cause us to forego investments we might otherwise make. Finally, we may be subject to a 100% excise tax on the income derived from certain transactions with our TRSs that are not on an arm's-length basis. We believe our arrangements with our TRSs are on arm's-length terms and intend to continue to operate in a manner that allows us to avoid incurring the 100% excise tax described above, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to avoid application of that tax.

The tax imposed on REITs engaging in “prohibited transactions” may limit our ability to engage in transactions which would be treated as sales for federal income tax purposes.
A REIT’s net income from prohibited transactions is subject to a 100% penalty tax. In general, prohibited transactions are sales or other dispositions of property, other than foreclosure property, held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. Although we do not intend to hold any properties that would be characterized as held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of our business, unless a sale or disposition qualifies under certain statutory safe harbors, such characterization is a factual determination and no guarantee can be given that the IRS would agree with our characterization of our properties or that we will always be able to make use of the available safe harbors.

Legislative or other actions affecting REITs could have a negative effect on our stockholders or us.
The rules dealing with federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department. Changes to the tax laws, with or without retroactive application, could adversely affect our investors or us. We cannot predict how changes in the tax laws might affect our investors or us. New legislation, U.S. Treasury Department regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly and negatively affect our ability to qualify as a REIT, the federal income tax consequences of such qualification, or the federal income tax consequences of an investment in us. Also, the law relating to the tax treatment of other entities, or an investment in other entities, could change, making an investment in such other entities more attractive relative to an investment in a REIT.

The recently enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “2017 Tax Act”) has significantly changed the U.S. federal income taxation of U.S. businesses and their owners, including REITs and their stockholders. Changes made by the 2017 Tax Act that could affect us and our stockholders include:
temporarily reducing individual U.S. federal income tax rates on ordinary income; the highest individual U.S. federal income tax rate has been reduced from 39.6% to 37% for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026;
permanently eliminating the progressive corporate tax rate structure, which previously imposed a maximum corporate tax rate of 35%, and replacing it with a flat corporate tax rate of 21%;
permitting a deduction for certain pass-through business income, including dividends received by our stockholders from us that are not designated by us as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income, which will allow individuals, trusts, and estates to deduct up to 20% of such amounts for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026;
reducing the highest rate of withholding with respect to our distributions to non-U.S. stockholders that are treated as attributable to gains from the sale or exchange of U.S. real property interests from 35% to 21%;
limiting our deduction for net operating losses arising in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 to 80% of REIT taxable income (prior to the application of the dividends paid deduction);
generally limiting the deduction for net business interest expense in excess of 30% of a business’s “adjusted taxable income,” except for taxpayers (including most equity REITs) that engage in certain real estate businesses

31


and elect out of this rule (provided that such electing taxpayers must use an alternative depreciation system with longer depreciation periods); and
eliminating the corporate alternative minimum tax.

Many of these changes are effective immediately, without any transition periods or grandfathering for existing transactions. The 2017 Tax Act is unclear in many respects and could be subject to potential amendments and technical corrections, as well as interpretations and implementing regulations by the U.S. Treasury Department and IRS, any of which could lessen or increase the impact of the 2017 Tax Act. In addition, it is unclear how these U.S. federal income tax changes will affect state and local taxation, which often uses federal taxable income as a starting point for computing state and local tax liabilities. While some of the changes made by the 2017 Tax Act may adversely affect us in one or more reporting periods and prospectively, other changes may be beneficial on a going forward basis. We continue to work with our tax advisors and auditors to determine the full impact that the 2017 Tax Act as a whole will have on us.

ITEM 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments
None.

32


ITEM 2.    Properties
Seniors Housing and Healthcare Properties
As of December 31, 2017, we owned more than 1,200 properties (including properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and properties classified as held for sale), consisting of seniors housing communities, medical office buildings (“MOBs”), life science and innovation centers, inpatient rehabilitation facilities (“IRFs”) and long-term acute care facilities (“LTACs”), health systems and skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”), and we had 14 properties under development, including four properties that are owned by unconsolidated real estate entities. We believe that maintaining a balanced portfolio of high-quality assets diversified by investment type, geographic location, asset type, tenant/operator, revenue source and operating model makes us less susceptible to single-state regulatory or reimbursement changes, regional climate events and local economic downturns and diminishes the risk that any single factor or event could materially harm our business.
As of December 31, 2017, we had $1.3 billion aggregate principal amount of mortgage loan indebtedness outstanding, secured by 88 of our properties. Excluding those portions attributed to our joint venture partners, our share of mortgage loan indebtedness outstanding was $1.2 billion.
The following table provides additional information regarding the geographic diversification of our portfolio of properties as of December 31, 2017 (including properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities, but excluding properties classified as held for sale):

33


 
Seniors Housing
Communities
 
SNFs
 
MOBs
 
Life Science and Innovation Centers
 
IRFs and LTACs
 
Health Systems
Geographic Location
# of
Properties
 
Units
 
# of Properties
 
Licensed
Beds
 
# of Properties
 
Square Feet(1)
 
# of Properties
 
Square Feet(1)
 
# of Properties
 
Licensed Beds
 
# of Properties
 
Licensed Beds
Alabama
6

 
122

 

 

 
4

 
469

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arizona
28

 
2,394

 

 

 
13

 
830

 

 

 
1

 
60

 

 

Arkansas
4

 
287

 

 

 
1

 
5

 

 

 

 

 

 

California
92

 
9,633

 

 

 
26

 
2,058

 

 

 
6

 
503

 

 

Colorado
19

 
1,689

 
1

 
82

 
13

 
769

 

 

 
1

 
68

 

 

Connecticut
14

 
1,631

 

 

 

 

 
2

 
1,032

 

 

 

 

District of Columbia

 

 

 

 
2

 
102

 

 

 

 

 

 

Florida
50

 
4,582

 

 

 
19

 
404

 
1

 
259

 
6

 
511

 

 

Georgia
20

 
1,751

 

 

 
14

 
1,201

 

 

 

 

 

 

Idaho
1

 
70

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Illinois
25

 
2,953

 
1

 
82

 
36

 
1,448

 
1

 
129

 
4

 
430

 

 

Indiana
9

 
680

 

 

 
23

 
1,603

 

 

 
1

 
59

 

 

Kansas
9

 
541

 

 

 
1

 
33

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kentucky
10

 
911

 
2

 
280

 
4

 
173

 

 

 
1

 
384

 

 

Louisiana
1

 
58

 

 

 
5

 
361

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maine
6

 
445

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maryland
5

 
360

 

 

 
2

 
83

 
5

 
489

 

 

 

 

Massachusetts
19

 
2,100

 
6

 
745

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michigan
23

 
1,457

 

 

 
14

 
599

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minnesota
14

 
855

 

 

 
4

 
241

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mississippi

 

 

 

 
1

 
51

 

 

 

 

 

 

Missouri
2

 
153

 

 

 
20

 
1,096

 
4

 
636

 
1

 
60

 

 

Montana
3

 
182

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nebraska
1

 
134

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nevada
5

 
589

 

 

 
5

 
416

 

 

 
1

 
52

 

 

New Hampshire
1

 
125

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

New Jersey
12

 
1,136

 
1

 
153

 
3

 
37

 

 

 

 

 

 

New Mexico
4

 
450

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
2

 
123

 
4

 
544

New York
41

 
4,538

 

 

 
4

 
244

 

 

 

 

 

 

North Carolina
23

 
1,894

 

 

 
18

 
759

 
8

 
1,371

 
1

 
124

 

 

North Dakota
2

 
115

 

 

 
1

 
114

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ohio
20

 
1,225

 
6

 
907

 
28

 
1,225

 

 

 
1

 
50

 

 

Oklahoma
8

 
463

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
4

 
954

Oregon
29

 
2,584

 

 

 
1

 
105

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pennsylvania
32

 
2,362

 
4

 
620

 
9

 
713

 
3

 
566

 
1

 
52

 

 

Rhode Island
6

 
596

 

 

 

 

 
2

 
250

 

 

 

 

South Carolina
5

 
402

 

 

 
20

 
1,104

 

 

 

 

 

 

South Dakota
4

 
182

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tennessee
18

 
1,420

 

 

 
10

 
395

 

 

 
1

 
49

 

 

Texas
49

 
3,786

 

 

 
18

 
814

 

 

 
9

 
590

 
1

 
445

Utah
3

 
321

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Virginia
8

 
655

 

 

 
5

 
231

 
3

 
425

 

 

 

 

Washington
28

 
2,357

 
5

 
469

 
10

 
579

 

 

 

 

 

 

West Virginia
2

 
124

 
4

 
326

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wisconsin
48

 
2,219

 

 

 
21

 
1,105

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wyoming
2

 
168

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total U.S.
711

 
60,699

 
30

 
3,664

 
355

 
19,367

 
29

 
5,157

 
37

 
3,115


9


1,943

Canada
41

 
4,499

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United Kingdom
12

 
779

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
3

 
121

Total
764

 
65,977

 
30

 
3,664

 
355

 
19,367

 
29

 
5,157

 
37

 
3,115


12


2,064

(1) 
Square Feet are in thousands 

34


Corporate Offices
Our headquarters are located in Chicago, Illinois and we have an additional corporate office in Louisville, Kentucky. We lease all of our corporate offices.


ITEM 3.    Legal Proceedings

The information contained in “NOTE 14—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference into this Item 3. Except as set forth therein, we are not a party to, nor is any of our property the subject of, any material pending legal proceedings.

ITEM 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.

35


PART II
ITEM 5.    Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information

Our common stock, par value $0.25 per share, is listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the symbol “VTR.” The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported on the NYSE and the dividends declared per share.
 
Sales Price of
Common Stock
 
Cash Dividends
Declared
 
High
 
Low
 
2016
 
 
 
 
 
First Quarter
$
63.22

 
$
48.43

 
$
0.73

Second Quarter
72.82

 
59.69

 
0.73

Third Quarter
76.56

 
67.33

 
0.73

Fourth Quarter
69.19

 
57.86

 
0.775

2017
 
 
 
 
 
First Quarter
$
65.41

 
$
59.36

 
$
0.775

Second Quarter
71.93

 
62.63

 
0.775

Third Quarter
69.98

 
64.80

 
0.775

Fourth Quarter
65.39

 
59.84

 
0.79


As of January 31, 2018, we had 356.2 million shares of our common stock outstanding held by approximately 4,520 stockholders of record.

Dividends and Distributions

We pay regular quarterly dividends to holders of our common stock to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) governing REITs. In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are required under the Code, among other things, to distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to any net capital gain. In addition, we will be subject to income tax at the regular corporate rate to the extent we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, including any net capital gains. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we paid the first three quarterly installments of our 2017 dividend of $0.775 per share. In December 2017, we declared the fourth quarter cash dividend on our common stock of $0.79 per share, which was paid in January 2018.

On February 9, 2018, our Board of Directors declared the first quarterly installment of our 2018 dividend on our common stock in the amount of $0.79 per share, payable in cash on April 12, 2018 to stockholders of record on April 2, 2018. We expect to distribute at least 100% of our taxable net income, after the use of any net operating loss carryforwards, to our stockholders for 2018.

In general, our Board of Directors makes decisions regarding the nature, frequency and amount of our dividends on a quarterly basis. Because the Board considers many factors when making these decisions, including our present and future liquidity needs, our current and projected financial condition and results of operations and the performance and credit quality of our tenants, operators, borrowers and managers, we cannot assure you that we will maintain the practice of paying regular quarterly dividends to continue to qualify as a REIT. Please see “Cautionary Statements” and the risk factors included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of other factors that may affect our distribution policy.

Director and Employee Stock Sales

Certain of our directors, executive officers and other employees have adopted and, from time to time in the future, may adopt non-discretionary, written trading plans that comply with Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act, or otherwise monetize, gift or transfer their equity-based compensation. These transactions typically are conducted for estate, tax and financial planning purposes and are subject to compliance with our Amended and Restated Securities Trading Policy and Procedures (“Securities Trading Policy”), the minimum stock ownership requirements contained in our Guidelines on Governance and all applicable laws and regulations.


36


Our Securities Trading Policy expressly prohibits our directors, executive officers and employees from buying or selling derivatives with respect to our securities or other financial instruments that are designed to hedge or offset a decrease in the market value of our securities and from engaging in short sales with respect to our securities. In addition, our Securities Trading Policy prohibits our directors and executive officers from holding our securities in margin accounts or pledging our securities to secure loans without the prior approval of our Audit and Compliance Committee. Each of our executive officers has advised us that he or she is in compliance with the Securities Trading Policy and has not pledged any of our equity securities to secure margin or other loans.

Stock Repurchases

The table below summarizes repurchases of our common stock made during the quarter ended December 31, 2017:
 
Number of Shares
Repurchased (1)
 
Average Price
Per Share
October 1 through October 31
8,378

 
$
62.51

November 1 through November 30

 
$

December 1 through December 31

 
$


(1)
Repurchases represent shares withheld to pay taxes on the vesting of restricted stock granted to employees under our 2006 Incentive Plan or 2012 Incentive Plan or restricted stock units granted to employees under the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. (“NHP”) 2005 Performance Incentive Plan and assumed by us in connection with our acquisition of NHP. The value of the shares withheld is the closing price of our common stock on the date the vesting or exercise occurred (or, if not a trading day, the immediately preceding trading day) or the fair market value of our common stock at the time of the exercise, as the case may be.

37


Stock Performance Graph

The following performance graph compares the cumulative total return (including dividends) to the holders of our common stock from December 31, 2012 through December 31, 2017, with the cumulative total returns of the NYSE Composite Index, the FTSE NAREIT Composite REIT Index (the “Composite REIT Index”) and the S&P 500 Index over the same period. The comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2012 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indexes and assumes reinvestment of dividends, as applicable. We have included the NYSE Composite Index in the performance graph because our common stock is listed on the NYSE, and we have included the S&P 500 Index because we are a member of the S&P 500. We have included the Composite REIT Index because we believe that it is most representative of the industries in which we compete, or otherwise provides a fair basis for comparison with us, and is therefore particularly relevant to an assessment of our performance. The figures in the table below are rounded to the nearest dollar.
 
12/31/2012
 
12/31/2013
 
12/31/2014
 
12/31/2015
 
12/31/2016
 
12/31/2017
Ventas
$100
 
$92.36
 
$120.92
 
$114.20
 
$132.64
 
$133.54
NYSE Composite Index
$100
 
$126.40
 
$135.09
 
$129.72
 
$145.38
 
$172.83
Composite REIT Index
$100
 
$102.34
 
$130.21
 
$132.88
 
$145.33
 
$158.84
S&P 500 Index
$100
 
$132.37
 
$150.48
 
$152.55
 
$170.78
 
$208.05


chart-a988ebe1a2f254398f8.jpg


38


ITEM 6.    Selected Financial Data

You should read the following selected financial data in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as acquisitions, dispositions, changes in accounting policies and other items may impact the comparability of the financial data.
 
As of and For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Operating Data
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
1,593,598

 
$
1,476,176

 
$
1,346,046

 
$
1,138,457

 
$
1,036,356

Resident fees and services
1,843,232

 
1,847,306

 
1,811,255

 
1,552,951

 
1,406,005

Interest expense
448,196

 
419,740

 
367,114

 
292,065

 
249,009

Property-level operating expenses
1,483,072

 
1,434,762

 
1,383,640

 
1,195,388

 
1,109,925

General, administrative and professional fees
135,490

 
126,875

 
128,035

 
121,738

 
115,083

Income from continuing operations
643,949

 
554,209

 
389,539

 
359,296

 
375,498

Net income attributable to common stockholders
1,356,470

 
649,231

 
417,843

 
475,767

 
453,509

Per Share Data
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
1.81

 
$
1.61

 
$
1.18

 
$
1.22

 
$
1.28

Diluted
$
1.80

 
$
1.59

 
$
1.17

 
$
1.21

 
$
1.27

Net income attributable to common stockholders:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
3.82

 
$
1.88

 
$
1.26

 
$
1.62

 
$
1.55

Diluted
$
3.78

 
$
1.86

 
$
1.25

 
$
1.60

 
$
1.54

Dividends declared per common share
$
3.115

 
$
2.965

 
$
3.04

 
$
2.965

 
$
2.735

Other Data
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
1,442,180

 
$
1,372,341

 
$
1,398,831

 
$
1,261,281

 
$
1,201,706

Net cash used in investing activities
(976,517
)
 
(1,234,643
)
 
(2,423,692
)
 
(2,055,040
)
 
(1,282,760
)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(671,327
)
 
96,838

 
1,023,058

 
751,621

 
108,045

FFO (1)
1,512,885

 
1,440,544

 
1,365,408

 
1,273,680

 
1,208,458

Normalized FFO (1)
1,491,241

 
1,438,643

 
1,493,683

 
1,330,018

 
1,220,709

Balance Sheet Data
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate investments, at cost
$
26,205,833

 
$
25,327,215

 
$
23,802,454

 
$
20,196,770

 
$
21,403,592

Cash and cash equivalents
81,355

 
286,707

 
53,023

 
55,348

 
94,816

Total assets
23,954,541

 
23,166,600

 
22,261,918

 
21,165,913

 
19,731,494

Senior notes payable and other debt
11,276,062

 
11,127,326

 
11,206,996

 
10,844,351

 
9,364,992


(1) 
We consider Funds From Operations (“FFO”) and normalized FFO to be useful supplemental measures of operating performance of an equity REIT. In particular, we believe that normalized FFO is useful because it allows investors, analysts and our management to compare our operating performance to the operating performance of other real estate companies and between periods on a consistent basis without having to account for differences caused by non-recurring items and other non-operational events such as transactions and litigation. In some cases, we provide information about identified non-cash components of FFO and normalized FFO because it allows investors, analysts and our management to assess the impact of those items on our financial results.

FFO and normalized FFO presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, or otherwise disclosed by us, may not be comparable to FFO and normalized FFO presented by other real estate companies due to the fact that not all real estate companies use the same definitions. FFO and normalized FFO should not be considered as alternatives to net income or income from continuing operations (both determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles

39


(“GAAP”)) as indicators of our financial performance or as alternatives to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as measures of our liquidity, nor are FFO and normalized FFO necessarily indicative of sufficient cash flow to fund all of our needs.

We use the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) definition of FFO. NAREIT defines FFO as net income attributable to common stockholders (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of real estate property, including gains or losses on re-measurement of equity method investments, and impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate, plus real estate depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. We define normalized FFO as FFO excluding the following income and expense items (which may be recurring in nature): (a) merger-related costs and expenses, including amortization of intangibles, transition and integration expenses, and deal costs and expenses, including expenses and recoveries relating to acquisition lawsuits; (b) the impact of any expenses related to asset impairment and valuation allowances, the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees, or additional costs, expenses, discounts, make-whole payments, penalties or premiums incurred as a result of early retirement or payment of our debt; (c) the non-cash effect of income tax benefits or expenses, the non-cash impact of changes to our executive equity compensation plan and derivative transactions that have non-cash mark-to-market impacts on our Consolidated Statements of Income; (d) the financial impact of contingent consideration, severance-related costs and charitable donations made to the Ventas Charitable Foundation; (e) gains and losses for non-operational foreign currency hedge agreements and changes in the fair value of financial instruments; (f) gains and losses on non-real estate dispositions and other unusual items related to unconsolidated entities; (g) expenses related to the re-audit and re-review in 2014 of our historical financial statements and related matters; and (h) net expenses or recoveries related to natural disasters.

See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Funds From Operations and Normalized Funds from Operations” included in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a reconciliation of FFO and normalized FFO to our GAAP earnings.

ITEM 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion provides information that management believes is relevant to an understanding and assessment of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Ventas, Inc. You should read this discussion in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as it will help you understand:

Our company and the environment in which we operate;

Our 2017 highlights and other recent developments;

Our critical accounting policies and estimates;

Our results of operations for the last three years;

How we manage our assets and liabilities;

Our liquidity and capital resources;

Our cash flows; and

Our future contractual obligations.

Corporate and Operating Environment

We are a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) with a highly diversified portfolio of seniors housing and healthcare properties located throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. As of December 31, 2017, we owned more than 1,200 properties (including properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and properties classified as held for sale), consisting of seniors housing communities, medical office buildings (“MOBs”), life science and innovation centers, inpatient rehabilitation facilities (“IRFs”) and long-term acute care facilities (“LTACs”), health systems and skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”), and we had 14 properties under development, including four properties that are owned by unconsolidated real estate entities. We are an S&P 500 company headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.

40


We primarily invest in seniors housing and healthcare properties through acquisitions and lease our properties to unaffiliated tenants or operate them through independent third-party managers. As of December 31, 2017, we leased a total of 546 properties (excluding MOBs) to various healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures.

As of December 31, 2017, pursuant to long-term management agreements, we engaged independent operators, such as Atria Senior Living, Inc. (“Atria”) and Sunrise Senior Living, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Sunrise”), to manage 297 seniors housing communities for us.
 
Our three largest tenants, Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Brookdale Senior Living”), Ardent Health Partners, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Ardent”) and Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Kindred”) leased from us 135 properties (excluding one property managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to a long-term management agreement), 10 properties and 31 properties (excluding one MOB included within our office operations reportable business segment), respectively, as of December 31, 2017.

Through our Lillibridge Healthcare Services, Inc. (“Lillibridge”) subsidiary and our ownership interest in PMB Real Estate Services LLC (“PMBRES”), we also provide MOB management, leasing, marketing, facility development and advisory services to highly rated hospitals and health systems throughout the United States. In addition, from time to time, we make secured and non-mortgage loans and other investments relating to seniors housing and healthcare operators or properties.

We conduct our operations through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and office operations. See “NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

As of December 31, 2017, our consolidated portfolio included 100% ownership interests in 1,135 properties and controlling joint venture interests in 69 properties, and we had non-controlling ownership interests in 31 properties through investments in unconsolidated entities. Through Lillibridge and PMBRES, we provided management and leasing services to third parties with respect to 105 MOBs as of December 31, 2017.

We aim to enhance shareholder value by delivering consistent, superior total returns through a strategy of: (1) generating reliable and growing cash flows; (2) maintaining a balanced, diversified portfolio of high-quality assets; and (3) preserving our financial strength, flexibility and liquidity.

Our ability to access capital in a timely and cost-effective manner is critical to the success of our business strategy because it affects our ability to satisfy existing obligations, including the repayment of maturing indebtedness, and to make future investments. Factors such as general market conditions, interest rates, credit ratings on our securities, expectations of our potential future earnings and cash distributions, and the trading price of our common stock that are beyond our control and fluctuate over time all impact our access to and cost of external capital. For that reason, we generally attempt to match the long-term duration of our investments in real property with long-term financing through the issuance of shares of our common stock or the incurrence of long-term fixed rate debt.

2017 Highlights and Other Recent Developments

Investments and Dispositions

In March 2017, we provided secured debt financing to a subsidiary of Ardent to facilitate Ardent’s acquisition of LHP Hospital Group, Inc., which included a $700.0 million term loan and a $60.0 million revolving line of credit feature (of which $28.0 million was outstanding at December 31, 2017). The LIBOR-based debt financing has a five-year term, a one-year lock out feature and a weighted average interest rate of approximately 9.3% as of December 31, 2017 and is guaranteed by Ardent’s parent company.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we acquired 15 triple-net leased properties (including six assets previously owned by an equity method investee), four properties reported within our office operations reportable business segment (three life science, research and medical assets and one medical office building) and three seniors housing communities (reported within our senior living operations reportable business segment) for an aggregate purchase price of $691.3 million.


41


During the year ended December 31, 2017, we sold 53 triple-net leased properties, five MOBs and certain vacant land parcels for aggregate consideration of $870.8 million, and we recognized a gain on the sale of these assets of $717.3 million, net of taxes.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we received aggregate proceeds of $37.6 million for the partial prepayment and $35.5 million for the full repayment of loans receivable, which resulted in total gains of $0.6 million.

Liquidity, Capital and Dividends

In March 2017, we issued and sold $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.100% senior notes due 2023 at a public offering price equal to 99.280% of par, for total proceeds of $397.1 million before the underwriting discount and expenses, and $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.850% senior notes due 2027 at a public offering price equal to 99.196% of par, for total proceeds of $396.8 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.

In April 2017, we entered into an unsecured credit facility comprised of a $3.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility, priced at LIBOR plus 0.875%, that replaced our previous $2.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility priced at LIBOR plus 1.0%.

In April 2017, we repaid in full, at par, $300.0 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 1.250% senior notes due 2017 upon maturity.

In June 2017, we issued and sold C$275.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.55% senior notes, Series D due 2023 at a price equal to 99.954% of par, for total proceeds of C$274.9 million before the agent fees and expenses. We used part of the proceeds to repay C$124.4 million on our unsecured term loan due 2019.

In August 2017, we used most of the proceeds from the sale of 22 SNFs to repay the balances then outstanding on the 2018 and 2019 term loans.

In September 2017, we entered into a new $400.0 million secured revolving construction credit facility which matures in 2022 and will be primarily used to finance life science and innovation center and other construction projects.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we issued and sold 1.1 million shares of common stock under our “at-the-market” (“ATM”) equity offering program. Aggregate net proceeds for these activities were $73.9 million, after sales agent commissions.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we paid the first three quarterly installments of our 2017 dividend of $0.775 per share. In December 2017, we declared the fourth quarter cash dividend on our common stock of $0.79 per share, which grew by 2% over third quarter 2017 and was paid in January 2018.

Portfolio

The sale of the triple-net leased properties above included 36 SNFs, owned by us and operated by Kindred. These assets were sold for aggregate consideration of approximately $700 million and we recognized a gain on the sale of $657.6 million, net of taxes.

Other Recent Developments

In January 2018, we transitioned the management of 76 private pay seniors housing communities to Eclipse Senior Living (“ESL”). These assets, substantially all of which were previously leased by Elmcroft Senior Living (“Elmcroft”), are now operated by ESL under a management contract with us. We acquired a 34% ownership stake in ESL with customary rights and protections. ESL management owns the remaining 66% stake. We also intend to form a new joint venture with an institutional partner related to the assets previously leased by Elmcroft. However, there can be no assurance whether, when or on what terms the joint venture will be completed.


42


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) set forth in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), as published by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions regarding future events that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We base these estimates on our experience and assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, if our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions or other matters had been different, we may have applied a different accounting treatment, resulting in a different presentation of our financial statements. We periodically reevaluate our estimates and assumptions, and in the event they prove to be different from actual results, we make adjustments in subsequent periods to reflect more current estimates and assumptions about matters that are inherently uncertain. We believe that the critical accounting policies described below, among others, affect our more significant estimates and judgments used in the preparation of our financial statements. For more information regarding our critical accounting policies, see “NOTE 2—ACCOUNTING POLICIES” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Principles of Consolidation

The Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly owned subsidiaries and the joint venture entities over which we exercise control. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation, and our net earnings are reduced by the portion of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests.

GAAP requires us to identify entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights and to determine which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). A VIE is broadly defined as an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; and (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. We consolidate our investment in a VIE when we determine that we are its primary beneficiary. We may change our original assessment of a VIE upon subsequent events such as the modification of contractual arrangements that affects the characteristics or adequacy of the entity’s equity investments at risk and the disposition of all or a portion of an interest held by the primary beneficiary.

We identify the primary beneficiary of a VIE as the enterprise that has both: (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance; and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the entity. We perform this analysis on an ongoing basis.

As it relates to investments in joint ventures, GAAP may preclude consolidation by the sole general partner in certain circumstances based on the type of rights held by the limited partner(s). We assess limited partners’ rights and their impact on our consolidation conclusions, and we reassess if there is a change to the terms or in the exercisability of the rights of the limited partners, the sole general partner increases or decreases its ownership of limited partnership interests, or there is an increase or decrease in the number of outstanding limited partnership interests. We also apply this guidance to managing member interests in limited liability companies.

We consolidate several VIEs that share the following common characteristics:

the VIE is in the legal form of an LP or LLC;
the VIE was designed to own and manage its underlying real estate investments;
we are the general partner or managing member of the VIE;
we own a majority of the voting interests in the VIE;
a minority of voting interests in the VIE are owned by external third parties, unrelated to us;
the minority owners do not have substantive kick-out or participating rights in the VIE; and
we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE.

We have separately identified certain special purpose entities that were established to allow investments in life science projects by tax credit investors (“TCIs”). We have determined that these special purpose entities are VIEs and that we are the

43


primary beneficiary of the VIEs, and therefore we consolidate these special purpose entities. Our primary beneficiary determination is based upon several factors, including but not limited to the rights we have in directing the activities which most significantly impact the VIEs’ economic performance as well as certain guarantees which protect the TCIs from losses should a tax credit recapture event occur.

Accounting for Real Estate Acquisitions

On January 1, 2017, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-01, Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”) which narrows the FASB’s definition of a business and provides a framework that gives entities a basis for making reasonable judgments about whether a transaction involves an asset or a business. ASU 2017-01 states that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets, the acquired asset is not a business. If this initial test is not met, an acquired asset cannot be considered a business unless it includes an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output. The primary differences between business combinations and asset acquisitions include recognition of goodwill at the acquisition date and expense recognition for transaction costs as incurred. We are applying ASU 2017-01 prospectively for acquisitions after January 1, 2017.

Regardless of whether an acquisition is considered a business combination or an asset acquisition, we record the cost of the businesses or assets acquired as tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based upon their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. Intangibles primarily include the value of in-place leases and acquired lease contracts.

We estimate the fair value of buildings acquired on an as-if-vacant basis or replacement cost basis and depreciate the building value over the estimated remaining life of the building, generally not to exceed 35 years. We determine the fair value of other fixed assets, such as site improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment, based upon the replacement cost and depreciate such value over the assets’ estimated remaining useful lives as determined at the applicable acquisition date. We determine the value of land either by considering the sales prices of similar properties in recent transactions or based on internal analyses of recently acquired and existing comparable properties within our portfolio. We generally determine the value of construction in progress based upon the replacement cost. However, for certain acquired properties that are part of a ground-up development, we determine fair value by using the same valuation approach as for all other properties and deducting the estimated cost to complete the development. During the remaining construction period, we capitalize project costs until the development has reached substantial completion. Construction in progress, including capitalized interest, is not depreciated until the development has reached substantial completion.

The fair value of acquired lease-related intangibles, if any, reflects: (i) the estimated value of any above and/or below market leases, determined by discounting the difference between the estimated market rent and in-place lease rent; and (ii) the estimated value of in-place leases related to the cost to obtain tenants, including leasing commissions, and an estimated value of the absorption period to reflect the value of the rent and recovery costs foregone during a reasonable lease-up period as if the acquired space was vacant. We amortize any acquired lease-related intangibles to revenue or amortization expense over the remaining life of the associated lease plus any assumed bargain renewal periods. If a lease is terminated prior to its stated expiration or not renewed upon expiration, we recognize all unamortized amounts of lease-related intangibles associated with that lease in operations at that time.

We estimate the fair value of purchase option intangible assets and liabilities, if any, by discounting the difference between the applicable property’s acquisition date fair value and an estimate of its future option price. We do not amortize the resulting intangible asset or liability over the term of the lease, but rather adjust the recognized value of the asset or liability upon sale.

We estimate the fair value of tenant or other customer relationships acquired, if any, by considering the nature and extent of existing relationships with the tenant or customer, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant or customer, the tenant’s credit quality, expectations of lease renewals with the tenant, and the potential for significant, additional future leasing arrangements with the tenant, and we amortize that value over the expected life of the associated arrangements or leases, including the remaining terms of the related leases and any expected renewal periods. We estimate the fair value of trade names and trademarks using a royalty rate methodology and amortize that value over the estimated useful life of the trade name or trademark.

In connection with an acquisition, we may assume rights and obligations under certain lease agreements pursuant to which we become the lessee of a given property. We generally assume the lease classification previously determined by the prior lessee absent a modification in the assumed lease agreement. We assess assumed operating leases, including ground leases, to determine whether the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable to us given current market conditions on the

44


acquisition date. To the extent the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable to us relative to market conditions on the acquisition date, we recognize an intangible asset or liability at fair value and amortize that asset or liability to interest or rental expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income over the applicable lease term. We include all lease-related intangible assets and liabilities within acquired lease intangibles and accounts payable and other liabilities, respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

We determine the fair value of loans receivable acquired by discounting the estimated future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar loans with the same terms and length to maturity would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings. We do not establish a valuation allowance at the acquisition date because the estimated future cash flows already reflect our judgment regarding their uncertainty. We recognize the difference between the acquisition date fair value and the total expected cash flows as interest income using an effective interest method over the life of the applicable loan. Subsequent to the acquisition date, we evaluate changes regarding the uncertainty of future cash flows and the need for a valuation allowance, as appropriate.

We estimate the fair value of noncontrolling interests assumed consistent with the manner in which we value all of the underlying assets and liabilities.

We calculate the fair value of long-term assumed debt by discounting the remaining contractual cash flows on each instrument at the current market rate for those borrowings, which we approximate based on the rate at which we would expect to incur a replacement instrument on the date of acquisition, and recognize any fair value adjustments related to long-term debt as effective yield adjustments over the remaining term of the instrument.

Impairment of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets

We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets, primarily consisting of investments in real estate, for impairment indicators. If indicators of impairment are present, we evaluate the carrying value of the related real estate investments in relation to the future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying operations. In performing this evaluation, we consider market conditions and our current intentions with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. We adjust the net book value of leased properties and other long-lived assets to fair value if the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows, including sales proceeds, is less than book value. We recognize an impairment loss at the time we make any such determination.

If impairment indicators arise with respect to intangible assets with finite useful lives, we evaluate impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If estimated future undiscounted net cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, then we estimate the fair value of the asset and compare the estimated fair value to the intangible asset’s carrying value. We recognize any shortfall from carrying value as an impairment loss in the current period.

We evaluate our investments in unconsolidated entities for impairment at least annually, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our investment may exceed its fair value. If we determine that a decline in the fair value of our investment in an unconsolidated entity is other-than-temporary, and if such reduced fair value is below the carrying value, we record an impairment.

We test goodwill for impairment at least annually, and more frequently if indicators arise. We first assess qualitative factors, such as current macroeconomic conditions, state of the equity and capital markets and our overall financial and operating performance, to determine the likelihood that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If we determine it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we proceed with the two-step approach to evaluating impairment. First, we estimate the fair value of the reporting unit and compare it to the reporting unit’s carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds fair value, we proceed with the second step, which requires us to assign the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if it had been acquired in a business combination at the date of the impairment test. The excess fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to the assets and liabilities is the implied value of goodwill and is used to determine the amount of impairment. We recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied value in the current period.

Estimates of fair value used in our evaluation of goodwill (if necessary based on our qualitative assessment), investments in real estate, investments in unconsolidated entities and intangible assets are based upon discounted future cash flow projections or other acceptable valuation techniques that are based, in turn, upon all available evidence including level three inputs, such as revenue and expense growth rates, estimates of future cash flows, capitalization rates, discount rates, general economic conditions and trends, or other available market data. Our ability to accurately predict future operating results

45


and cash flows and to estimate and determine fair values impacts the timing and recognition of impairments. While we believe our assumptions are reasonable, changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on our financial results.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

Fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement, and we determine fair value based on the assumptions that we expect market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within levels one and two of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within level three of the hierarchy).

Level one inputs utilize unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that we have the ability to access. Level two inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in level one that are directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability. Level two inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and other inputs for the asset or liability that are observable at commonly quoted intervals, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates and yield curves. Level three inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which typically are based on our own assumptions, because there is little, if any, related market activity. If the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the entire fair value measurement falls is the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. If the volume and level of market activity for an asset or liability has decreased significantly relative to the normal market activity for such asset or liability (or similar assets or liabilities), then transactions or quoted prices may not accurately reflect fair value. In addition, if there is evidence that a transaction for an asset or liability is not orderly, little, if any, weight is placed on that transaction price as an indicator of fair value. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

Revenue Recognition

Triple-Net Leased Properties and Office Operations

Certain of our triple-net leases and most of our MOB and life science and innovation center (collectively, “office operations”) leases provide for periodic and determinable increases in base rent. We recognize base rental revenues under these leases on a straight-line basis over the applicable lease term when collectability is reasonably assured. Recognizing rental income on a straight-line basis generally results in recognized revenues during the first half of a lease term exceeding the cash amounts contractually due from our tenants, creating a straight-line rent receivable that is included in other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Certain of our leases provide for periodic increases in base rent only if certain revenue parameters or other substantive contingencies are met. We recognize the increased rental revenue under these leases as the related parameters or contingencies are met, rather than on a straight-line basis over the applicable lease term.

Senior Living Operations

We recognize resident fees and services, other than move-in fees, monthly as services are provided. We recognize move-in fees on a straight-line basis over the average resident stay. Our lease agreements with residents generally have terms of 12 to 18 months and are cancelable by the resident upon 30 days’ notice.

Other

We recognize interest income from loans and investments, including discounts and premiums, using the effective interest method when collectibility is reasonably assured. We apply the effective interest method on a loan-by-loan basis and recognize discounts and premiums as yield adjustments over the related loan term. We recognize interest income on an impaired loan to the extent our estimate of the fair value of the collateral is sufficient to support the balance of the loan, other receivables and all related accrued interest. When the balance of the loan, other receivables and all related accrued interest is equal to or less than our estimate of the fair value of the collateral, we recognize interest income on a cash basis. We provide a reserve against an impaired loan to the extent our total investment in the loan exceeds our estimate of the fair value of the loan collateral.


46


We recognize income from rent, lease termination fees, development services, management advisory services and all other income when all of the following criteria are met in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin 104: (i) the applicable agreement has been fully executed and delivered; (ii) services have been rendered; (iii) the amount is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured.

Allowances

We assess the collectibility of our rent receivables, including straight-line rent receivables. We base our assessment of the collectibility of rent receivables (other than straight-line rent receivables) on several factors, including, among other things, payment history, the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, the value of the underlying collateral, if any, and current economic conditions. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is probable that we will be unable to recover the full value of the receivable, we provide a reserve against the portion of the receivable that we estimate may not be recovered. We base our assessment of the collectibility of straight-line rent receivables on several factors, including, among other things, the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, the historical operations and operating trends of the property, the historical payment pattern of the tenant and the type of property. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is probable that we will be unable to receive the rent payments due in the future, we provide a reserve against the recognized straight-line rent receivable asset for the portion, up to its full value, that we estimate may not be recovered. If we change our assumptions or estimates regarding the collectibility of future rent payments required by a lease, we may adjust our reserve to increase or reduce the rental revenue recognized in the period we make such change in our assumptions or estimates.

Federal Income Tax

We have elected to be treated as a REIT under the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), for every year beginning with the year ended December 31, 1999. Accordingly, we generally are not subject to federal income tax on net income that we distribute to our stockholders, provided that we continue to qualify as a REIT. However, with respect to certain of our subsidiaries that have elected to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS” or “TRS entities”), we record income tax expense or benefit, as those entities are subject to federal income tax similar to regular corporations. Certain foreign subsidiaries are subject to foreign income tax, although they did not elect to be treated as TRSs.

We account for deferred income taxes using the asset and liability method and recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in our financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, we determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Any increase or decrease in the deferred tax liability that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes us to change our judgment about expected future tax consequences of events, is included in the tax provision when such changes occur. Deferred income taxes also reflect the impact of operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance is provided if we believe it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Any increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes us to change our judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset, is included in the tax provision when such changes occur.

We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We recognize interest and penalties, if applicable, related to uncertain tax positions as part of income tax benefit or expense.

Recently Issued or Adopted Accounting Standards

On January 1, 2017, we adopted ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (“ASU 2016-09”) which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for forfeitures and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. Adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements

In 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue From Contracts With Customers (“ASU 2014-09”, as codified in “ASC 606”), which outlines a comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. ASC 606 states that “an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.” While ASC 606 specifically references contracts with customers, it also applied to other transactions such as the sale of real

47


estate. ASC 606 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and we plan to adopt ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method.

We have evaluated all of our revenue streams to identify whether each revenue stream would be subject to the provisions of ASC 606 and any differences in the timing, measurement or presentation of revenue recognition. Based on a review of our various revenue streams, we believe the following items in our Consolidated Statements of Income are subject to ASC 606: office building and other services revenue, certain elements of our resident fees and services and gains on the sale of real estate. Our office building and other services revenues are primarily generated by management contracts where we provide management, leasing, marketing, facility development and advisory services. Resident fees and services primarily include amounts related to resident leases (subject to ASC 840, Leases) but also includes revenues generated through point-of-sale transactions that are ancillary to the residents’ contractual rights to occupy living and common-area space at the communities. While these revenue streams are subject to the provisions of ASC 606, we believe that the pattern and timing of recognition of income will be consistent with the current accounting model.

As it relates to gains on sale of real estate, we will apply the provisions of ASC 610-20, Gain or Loss From Derecognition of Non-financial Assets (“ASC 610-20”), and we expect to recognize any gains when we transfer control of a property and when it is probable that we will collect substantially all of the related consideration. We will no longer apply existing sales criteria in ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment. We will recognize on January 1, 2018, through a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings, $31.2 million of deferred gains relating to sales of real estate assets in 2015. Other than the cumulative effect adjustment relating to such deferred gains, the adoption of ASC 606 and ASC 610-20 will not have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. Our remaining implementation item includes finalizing revised disclosures in accordance with the new standard.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”), which introduces a lessee model that brings most leases on the balance sheet and, among other changes, eliminates the requirement in current GAAP for an entity to use bright-line tests in determining lease classification. The FASB also issued an Exposure Draft on January 5, 2018 proposing to amend ASU 2016-02, which would provide lessors with a practical expedient, by class of underlying assets, to not separate non-lease components from the related lease components and, instead, to account for those components as a single lease component, if certain criteria are met. ASU 2016-02 and the related Exposure Draft are not effective for us until January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We are continuing to evaluate this guidance and the impact to us, as both lessor and lessee, on our Consolidated Financial Statements. We expect to utilize the practical expedients proposed in the Exposure Draft as part of our adoption of ASU 2016-02.

In 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”), which provides clarification regarding how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows and ASU 2016-18, Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”), which requires an entity to show the changes in total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 and ASU 2016-18 are effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and will be applied by us using a retrospective transition method. Adoption of these standards is not expected to have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory (“ASU 2016-16”), which requires a company to recognize the tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. ASU 2016-16 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and will be applied by us using a modified retrospective method. Adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.


Results of Operations

In August 2015, we completed the spin-off of most of our post-acute/skilled nursing facility portfolio into an independent, publicly traded REIT name Care Capital Properties, Inc. (“CCP”) (the “CCP Spin-Off”). The historical results of operations of the CCP properties are presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying results of operations. Throughout this discussion, “continuing operations” does not include properties disposed of as part of the CCP Spin-Off.

In September 2016, we completed the acquisition of substantially all of the university affiliated life science and innovation real estate assets of Wexford Science & Technology, LLC (“Wexford”) from affiliates of Blackstone Real Estate Partners VIII, L.P. (the “Life Sciences Acquisition”). As a result, we renamed our MOB operations reportable business segment “office operations,” which now includes both MOBs and life science and innovation centers.

48


As of December 31, 2017, we operated through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and office operations. Under our triple-net leased properties segment, we invest in and own seniors housing and healthcare properties throughout the United States and the United Kingdom and lease those properties to healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses. In our senior living operations segment, we invest in seniors housing communities throughout the United States and Canada and engage independent operators, such as Atria and Sunrise, to manage those communities. In our office operations segment, we primarily acquire, own, develop, lease and manage MOBs and life science and innovation centers throughout the United States. Information provided for “all other” includes income from loans and investments and other miscellaneous income and various corporate-level expenses not directly attributable to any of our three reportable business segments. Assets included in “all other” consist primarily of corporate assets, including cash, restricted cash, loans receivable and investments, and miscellaneous accounts receivable. Our chief operating decision makers evaluate performance of the combined properties in each reportable business segment and determine how to allocate resources to those segments, in significant part, based on segment NOI and related measures. For further information regarding our business segments and a discussion of our definition of segment NOI, see “NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
    
Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016

The table below shows our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and the effect of changes in those results from period to period on our net income attributable to common stockholders.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
(Decrease) Increase to Net Income
 
2017
 
2016
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Triple-net leased properties
$
844,711

 
$
850,755

 
$
(6,044
)
 
(0.7
)%
Senior living operations
593,167

 
604,328

 
(11,161
)
 
(1.8
)
Office operations
524,566

 
444,276

 
80,290

 
18.1

All other
119,208

 
101,214

 
17,994

 
17.8

Total segment NOI
2,081,652

 
2,000,573

 
81,079

 
4.1

Interest and other income
6,034

 
876

 
5,158

 
nm

Interest expense
(448,196
)
 
(419,740
)
 
(28,456
)
 
(6.8
)
Depreciation and amortization
(887,948
)
 
(898,924
)
 
10,976

 
1.2

General, administrative and professional fees
(135,490
)
 
(126,875
)
 
(8,615
)
 
(6.8
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
(754
)
 
(2,779
)
 
2,025

 
72.9

Merger-related expenses and deal costs
(10,535
)
 
(24,635
)
 
14,100

 
57.2

Other
(20,052
)
 
(9,988
)
 
(10,064
)
 
nm

Income before unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations, real estate dispositions and noncontrolling interests
584,711

 
518,508

 
66,203

 
12.8

(Loss) income from unconsolidated entities
(561
)
 
4,358

 
(4,919
)
 
nm

Income tax benefit
59,799

 
31,343

 
28,456

 
nm

Income from continuing operations
643,949

 
554,209

 
89,740

 
16.2

Discontinued operations
(110
)
 
(922
)
 
812

 
nm

Gain on real estate dispositions
717,273

 
98,203

 
619,070

 
nm

Net income
1,361,112

 
651,490

 
709,622

 
nm

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
4,642

 
2,259

 
(2,383
)
 
nm

Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
1,356,470

 
$
649,231

 
707,239

 
nm


nm—not meaningful 


49


Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties

NOI for our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment equals the rental income and other services revenue earned from our triple-net assets. We incur no direct operating expenses for this segment.

The following table summarizes results of operations in our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Decrease to Segment NOI
 
2017
 
2016
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
840,131

 
$
845,834

 
$
(5,703
)
 
(0.7
)%
Other services revenue
4,580

 
4,921

 
(341
)
 
(6.9
)
Segment NOI
$
844,711

 
$
850,755

 
(6,044
)
 
(0.7
)
    
Triple-net leased properties segment NOI decreased in 2017 over the prior year primarily due the sale of 36 Kindred SNF properties during 2017, partially offset by rent increases due to contractual escalations pursuant to the terms of our leases and rent from eight seniors housing communities that we transitioned from senior living operations to triple-net leased properties during 2017.

In our triple-net leased properties segment, our revenues generally consist of fixed rental amounts (subject to annual contractual escalations) received from our tenants in accordance with the applicable lease terms. However, occupancy rates may affect the profitability of our tenants’ operations. The following table sets forth average continuing occupancy rates related to the triple-net leased properties we owned at December 31, 2017 for the trailing 12 months ended September 30, 2017 (which is the most recent information available to us from our tenants) and average continuing occupancy rates related to the triple-net leased properties we owned at December 31, 2016 for the trailing 12 months ended September 30, 2016.
 
Number of Properties at December 31, 2017 (1)
 
Average Occupancy
for the Trailing 12 Months
Ended September 30,
2017 (1)
 
 
Number of Properties at December 31, 2016 (1)
 
Average Occupancy
for the Trailing 12 Months
Ended September 30,
2016 (1)
Seniors housing communities
418

 
86.6
%
 
 
431

 
88.2
%
SNFs
17

 
86.4

 
 
53

 
79.9

IRFs and LTACs
36

 
60.4

 
 
38

 
59.1


(1) 
Excludes properties included in discontinued operations and properties classified as held for sale, non-stabilized properties, properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and certain properties for which we do not receive occupancy information. Also excludes properties acquired during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and properties that transitioned operators for which we do not have eight full quarters of results subsequent to the transition.

The following table compares results of operations for our 494 same-store triple-net leased properties, unadjusted for foreign currency movements between comparison periods. With regard to our triple-net leased properties segment, “same-store” refers to properties owned, consolidated, operational and reported under a consistent business model for the full period in both comparison periods, excluding assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017 and assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations.

50


 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase to Segment NOI
 
2017
 
2016
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
769,063

 
$
760,848

 
$
8,215

 
1.1
%
Segment NOI
$
769,063

 
$
760,848

 
8,215

 
1.1


    Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations

The following table summarizes results of operations in our senior living operations reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Decrease to Segment NOI
 
2017
 
2016
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Resident fees and services
$
1,843,232

 
$
1,847,306

 
$
(4,074
)
 
(0.2
)%
Less: Property-level operating expenses
(1,250,065
)
 
(1,242,978
)
 
(7,087
)
 
(0.6
)
Segment NOI
$
593,167

 
$
604,328

 
(11,161
)
 
(1.8
)
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Average Unit
Occupancy
for the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Average Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Year Ended
December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
Total communities
293

 
298

 
88.3
%
 
90.3
%
 
$
5,725

 
$
5,474

    
Resident fees and services include all amounts earned from residents at our seniors housing communities, such as rental fees related to resident leases, extended health care fees and other ancillary service income. Our senior living operations segment revenues decreased in 2017 over the prior year primarily due to the transition of eight seniors housing communities to our triple-net leased properties segment and decreased occupancy at our seniors housing communities.

Property-level operating expenses related to our senior living operations segment include labor, food, utilities, marketing, management and other costs of operating the properties. Property-level operating expenses increased year over year primarily due to increases in salaries, benefits, insurance and other operating expenses and the implementation of new care technologies.

The following table compares results of operations for our 285 same-store senior living operating communities, unadjusted for foreign currency movements between periods. With regard to our senior living operations segment, “same-store” refers to properties owned, consolidated, operational and reported under a consistent business model for the full period in both comparison periods, excluding properties that transitioned operators since the start of the prior comparison period, assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017 and assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 
2017
 
2016
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Resident fees and services
$
1,791,843

 
$
1,765,183

 
$
26,660

 
1.5
 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses
(1,215,440
)
 
(1,187,351
)
 
(28,089
)
 
(2.4
)
Segment NOI
$
576,403

 
$
577,832

 
(1,429
)
 
(0.2
)

51


 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Average Unit
Occupancy
for the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Average Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Year Ended
December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
Same-store communities
285

 
285

 
88.3
%
 
90.4
%
 
$
5,745

 
$
5,526


Segment NOI—Office Operations

The following table summarizes results of operations in our office operations reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 
2017
 
2016
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Office Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
753,467

 
$
630,342

 
$
123,125

 
19.5
 %
Office building services revenue
7,497

 
13,029

 
(5,532
)
 
(42.5
)
Total revenues
760,964

 
643,371

 
117,593

 
18.3

Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property-level operating expenses
(233,007
)
 
(191,784
)
 
(41,223
)
 
(21.5
)
Office building services costs
(3,391
)
 
(7,311
)
 
3,920

 
53.6

Segment NOI
$
524,566

 
$
444,276

 
80,290

 
18.1

 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Occupancy at
December 31,
 
Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Year Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
Total office buildings
391

 
388

 
92.0
%
 
91.7
%
 
$
32

 
$
31

    
The increase in our office operations segment rental income in 2017 over the prior year is attributed primarily to the office buildings we acquired during 2017 and 2016, partially offset by dispositions. The increase in our office building property-level operating expenses is due primarily to those acquired office buildings and increases in real estate taxes and other operating expenses, partially offset by dispositions.

Office building services revenue and costs both decreased in 2017 over the prior year primarily due to decreased construction activity during 2017 compared to 2016.     

The following table compares results of operations for our 350 same-store office buildings. With regard to our office operations segment, “same-store” refers to properties owned, consolidated, operational and reported under a consistent business model for the full period in both comparison periods, excluding assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017 and assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 
2017
 
2016
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Office Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
558,575

 
$
552,045

 
$
6,530

 
1.2
 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses
(169,583
)
 
(164,987
)
 
(4,596
)
 
(2.8
)
Segment NOI
$
388,992

 
$
387,058

 
1,934

 
0.5


52


 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Occupancy at
December 31,
 
Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Year Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
Same-store office buildings
350

 
350

 
91.3
%
 
92.0
%
 
$
31

 
$
30

    
Segment NOI - All Other

All other increased in 2017 over the prior year due primarily to income from new loans issued during 2017, partially offset by decreased interest income attributable to loan repayments received during 2016 and 2017.

Interest and other income

Interest and other income increased $5.2 million in 2017 over the prior year as a result of fees received from a tenant in 2017 which were not associated with a lease agreement.

Interest Expense

The $28.5 million increase in total interest expense, is attributed primarily to a $17.1 million increase in interest due to higher debt balances and an $11.3 million increase due to higher effective interest rates, including the amortization of any fair value adjustments. Our effective interest rate was 3.7% for 2017, compared to 3.6% for 2016.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense related to continuing operations decreased during 2017 compared to 2016, primarily due to a decrease in amortization related to certain lease intangibles that were fully amortized during the third quarter of 2016, partially offset by a full year of depreciation and amortization related to the September 2016 Life Sciences Acquisition.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt, Net

The loss on extinguishment of debt, net in 2017 resulted primarily from the repayment of term loans and the replacement of our previous $2.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility. The loss on extinguishment of debt, net in 2016 was due to our redemption and repayment of $550.0 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 1.55% senior notes due 2016 and term loan repayments in 2016.

Merger-Related Expenses and Deal Costs

Merger-related expenses and deal costs consist of transition, integration, deal and severance-related expenses primarily related to pending and consummated transactions required by GAAP to be expensed rather than capitalized into the asset value. The $14.1 million decrease in merger-related expenses and deal costs in 2017 over the prior year is primarily due to the September 2016 Life Sciences Acquisition.

Other

The $10.1 million increase in other for 2017 over 2016 is primarily due to charges related to natural disasters. We have insurance coverage to mitigate the financial impact of these types of events. However, there can be no assurance regarding the amount or timing of any insurance recoveries. Such recoveries will be recognized when collection is deemed probable.

Income from Unconsolidated Entities

The $4.9 million decrease in income from unconsolidated entities for 2017 over 2016 is primarily due to our share of net losses related to certain unconsolidated entities in 2017 partially offset by the February 2017 fair value re-measurement of our previously held equity interest, resulting in a gain on re-measurement of $3.0 million. Refer to “NOTE 7—INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.


53


Income Tax Benefit

The 2017 income tax benefit is primarily due to accounting for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “2017 Tax Act”), specifically a $64.5 million benefit from the reduced U.S. federal corporate tax rate on net deferred tax liabilities and an offsetting expense of $23.3 million to establish a valuation allowance on deferred interest carryforwards, losses of certain TRS entities and the release of a tax reserve. The 2016 income tax benefit was due primarily to losses of certain TRS entities, the reversal of a net deferred tax liability at one TRS and the release of a tax reserve. The TRS losses were mainly attributable to the depreciation and amortization of fixed and intangible assets recorded as deferred tax liabilities in purchase accounting.

Gain on Real Estate Dispositions

The increase of $619.1 million in gain on real estate dispositions for 2017 over 2016 is due primarily to the sale of 36 Kindred SNFs in 2017.

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

The increase in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of $2.4 million for 2017 over 2016 is primarily due to the September 2016 Life Sciences Acquisition.
 
Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

The table below shows our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the effect of changes in those results from period to period on our net income attributable to common stockholders.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease) to Net Income
 
2016
 
2015
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Triple-net leased properties
$
850,755

 
$
784,234

 
$
66,521

 
8.5
 %
Senior living operations
604,328

 
601,840

 
2,488

 
0.4

Office operations
444,276

 
399,891

 
44,385

 
11.1

All other
101,214

 
89,176

 
12,038

 
13.5

Total segment NOI
2,000,573

 
1,875,141

 
125,432

 
6.7

Interest and other income
876

 
1,052

 
(176
)
 
(16.7
)
Interest expense
(419,740
)
 
(367,114
)
 
(52,626
)
 
(14.3
)
Depreciation and amortization
(898,924
)
 
(894,057
)
 
(4,867
)
 
(0.5
)
General, administrative and professional fees
(126,875
)
 
(128,035
)
 
1,160

 
0.9

Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
(2,779
)
 
(14,411
)
 
11,632

 
80.7

Merger-related expenses and deal costs
(24,635
)
 
(102,944
)
 
78,309

 
76.1

Other
(9,988
)
 
(17,957
)
 
7,969

 
44.4

Income before unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations, real estate dispositions and noncontrolling interest
518,508

 
351,675

 
166,833

 
47.4

Income (loss) from unconsolidated entities
4,358

 
(1,420
)
 
5,778

 
nm

Income tax benefit
31,343

 
39,284

 
(7,941
)
 
(20.2
)
Income from continuing operations
554,209

 
389,539

 
164,670

 
42.3

Discontinued operations
(922
)
 
11,103

 
(12,025
)
 
nm

Gain on real estate dispositions
98,203

 
18,580

 
79,623

 
nm

Net income
651,490

 
419,222

 
232,268

 
55.4

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
2,259

 
1,379

 
(880
)
 
(63.8
)
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
649,231

 
$
417,843

 
231,388

 
55.4


nm—not meaningful 

54


Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties

The following table summarizes results of operations in our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2016, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase to Segment NOI
 
2016
 
2015
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
845,834

 
$
779,801

 
$
66,033

 
8.5
%
Other services revenue
4,921

 
4,433

 
488

 
11.0

Segment NOI
$
850,755

 
$
784,234

 
66,521

 
8.5

    
Triple-net leased properties segment NOI increased in 2016 over the prior year primarily due to rent from the properties we acquired and developed during 2016 and 2015, contractual escalations in rent pursuant to the terms of our leases, and increases in base and other rent under certain of our leases, partially offset by 2015 lease termination fees.

The following table compares results of operations for our 511 same-store triple-net leased properties, unadjusted for foreign currency movements between comparison periods. With regard to our triple-net leased properties segment, “same-store” refers to properties owned, consolidated, operational and reported under a consistent business model for the full period in both comparison periods, excluding assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2016 and assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase to Segment NOI
 
2016
 
2015
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
695,124

 
$
673,706

 
$
21,418

 
3.2
%
Segment NOI
$
695,124

 
$
673,706

 
21,418

 
3.2


Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations

The following table summarizes results of operations in our senior living operations reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2016, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 
2016
 
2015
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Resident fees and services
$
1,847,306

 
$
1,811,255

 
$
36,051

 
2.0
 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses
(1,242,978
)
 
(1,209,415
)
 
(33,563
)
 
(2.8
)
Segment NOI
$
604,328

 
$
601,840

 
2,488

 
0.4

 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Average Unit
Occupancy for
the Year
Ended
December 31,
 
Average
Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Year
Ended
December 31,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Total communities
298

 
305

 
90.3
%
 
91.2
%
 
$
5,474

 
$
5,255

    

55


Resident fees and services increased in 2016 over the prior year primarily due to seniors housing communities we acquired during 2015 and an increase in average monthly revenue per occupied room, partially offset by decreased occupancy at our seniors housing communities.

Property-level operating expenses also increased year over year primarily due to the acquired properties described above and increases in salaries, bonus, benefits, insurance, real estate tax expenses and other operating expenses.

The following table compares results of operations for our 262 same-store senior living operating communities, unadjusted for foreign currency movements between periods. With regard to our senior living operations segment, “same-store” refers to properties that we owned and were operational for the full period in both comparison periods, excluding properties that transitioned operators since the start of the prior comparison period, assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2016 and assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 
2016
 
2015
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenues
$
1,667,279

 
$
1,617,757

 
$
49,522

 
3.1
 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses
(1,116,109
)
 
(1,077,510
)
 
(38,599
)
 
(3.6
)
Segment NOI
$
551,170

 
$
540,247

 
10,923

 
2.0

 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Average Unit
Occupancy for
the Year
Ended
December 31,
 
Average
Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Year
Ended
December 31,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Same-store communities
262

 
262

 
90.4
%
 
91.1
%
 
$
5,578

 
$
5,379


Segment NOI—Office Operations

The following table summarizes results of operations in our office operations reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2016, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 
2016
 
2015
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Office Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
630,342

 
$
566,245

 
$
64,097

 
11.3
 %
Office building services revenue
13,029

 
34,436

 
(21,407
)
 
(62.2
)
Total revenues
643,371

 
600,681

 
42,690

 
7.1

Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property-level operating expenses
(191,784
)
 
(174,225
)
 
(17,559
)
 
(10.1
)
Office building services costs
(7,311
)
 
(26,565
)
 
19,254

 
72.5

Segment NOI
$
444,276

 
$
399,891

 
44,385

 
11.1

 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Occupancy at
December 31,
 
Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Year Ended December 31,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Total office buildings
388

 
369

 
91.7
%
 
91.7
%
 
$
31

 
$
29



56


The increase in our office operations segment rental income in 2016 over the prior year is attributed primarily to the MOBs we acquired during 2016 and 2015 and the Life Sciences Acquisition, as well as in-place lease escalations. The increase in our office building property-level operating expenses is due primarily to those acquired MOBs and life science and innovation centers and increases in real estate taxes and other operating expenses.

Office building services revenue and costs both decreased in 2016 over the prior year primarily due to decreased construction activity during 2016 compared to 2015.

The following table compares results of operations for our 272 same-store office buildings. With regard to our office operations segment, “same-store” refers to properties owned, consolidated, operational and reported under a consistent business model for the full period in both comparison periods, excluding assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2016 and assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
(Decrease) Increase
to Segment NOI
 
2016
 
2015
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Office Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
432,657

 
$
434,022

 
$
(1,365
)
 
(0.3
)%
Less: Property-level operating expenses
(142,826
)
 
(144,218
)
 
1,392

 
1.0

Segment NOI
$
289,831

 
$
289,804

 
27

 
0.0

    
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Occupancy at
December 31,
 
Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Year Ended December 31,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Same-store office buildings
272

 
272

 
90.6
%
 
91.2
%
 
$
31

 
$
31

    
Segment NOI - All Other

All other increased in 2016 over the prior year due primarily to a February 2016 $140.0 million secured mezzanine loan investment that has an annual interest rate of 9.95%, partially offset by decreased interest income due to loans repaid during 2016.

Interest Expense

The $7.8 million decrease in total interest expense, including interest allocated to discontinued operations of $60.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, is attributed primarily to an $11.5 million reduction in interest due to lower debt balances, partially offset by a $3.7 million increase due to higher effective interest rates, including the amortization of any fair value adjustments. Our effective interest rate was 3.63% for 2016, compared to 3.60% for 2015.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt, Net

The loss on extinguishment of debt, net in 2016 and 2015 resulted primarily from various debt repayments we made to improve our credit profile. The 2016 activity related to the redemption and repayment of the $550.0 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 1.55% senior notes due 2016 and term loan repayments. The 2015 repayments were made primarily with proceeds from the distribution paid to us at the time of the CCP Spin-Off.

Merger-Related Expenses and Deal Costs

The $78.3 million decrease in merger-related expenses and deal costs in 2016 over the prior year is primarily due to the January 2015 acquisition of American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust, Inc. and the August 2015 acquisition of Ardent Health Services, Inc., partially offset by costs incurred relating to the September 2016 Life Sciences Acquisition.

57


Income Tax Benefit

Income tax benefit for 2016 was due primarily to losses of certain TRS entities, the reversal of a net deferred tax liability at one TRS and the release of a tax reserve. Income tax benefit for 2015 was due primarily to the income tax benefit of ordinary losses of certain TRS entities. The TRS losses were mainly attributable to the depreciation and amortization of fixed and intangible assets recorded as deferred tax liabilities in purchase accounting.

Discontinued Operations

Discontinued operations for 2016 reflects $0.9 million of separation costs relating to the CCP Spin-Off. Discontinued operations for 2015 are primarily the result of $46.4 million of transaction and separation costs associated with the CCP Spin-Off and net income for the CCP operations from January 1, 2015 through August 17, 2015, the date of the CCP Spin-Off.

Gain on Real Estate Dispositions

The $79.6 million increase in gain on real estate dispositions in 2016 over the same period in 2015 primarily relates to the 2016 sale of one triple-net leased property.

    
Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We consider certain non-GAAP financial measures to be useful supplemental measures of our operating performance. A non-GAAP financial measure is a measure of historical or future financial performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes or includes amounts that are not so excluded from or included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. Described below are the non-GAAP financial measures used by management to evaluate our operating performance and that we consider most useful to investors, together with reconciliations of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

The non-GAAP financial measures we present in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may not be comparable to those presented by other real estate companies due to the fact that not all real estate companies use the same definitions. You should not consider these measures as alternatives to net income or income from continuing operations (both determined in accordance with GAAP) as indicators of our financial performance or as alternatives to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as measures of our liquidity, nor are these measures necessarily indicative of sufficient cash flow to fund all of our needs. In order to facilitate a clear understanding of our consolidated historical operating results, you should examine these measures in conjunction with net income and income from continuing operations as presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements and other financial data included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Funds From Operations and Normalized Funds From Operations

Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. However, since real estate values historically have risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors deem presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. For that reason, we consider Funds From Operations (“FFO”) and normalized FFO to be appropriate supplemental measures of operating performance of an equity REIT. In particular, we believe that normalized FFO is useful because it allows investors, analysts and our management to compare our operating performance to the operating performance of other real estate companies and between periods on a consistent basis without having to account for differences caused by non-recurring items and other non-operational events such as transactions and litigation. In some cases, we provide information about identified non-cash components of FFO and normalized FFO because it allows investors, analysts and our management to assess the impact of those items on our financial results.

We use the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) definition of FFO. NAREIT defines FFO as net income attributable to common stockholders (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of real estate property, including gains or losses on re-measurement of equity method investments, and impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate, plus real estate depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. We define normalized FFO as FFO excluding the following income and expense items (which may be recurring in nature): (a) merger-related costs and expenses, including amortization of intangibles, transition and integration expenses, and deal costs and expenses, including expenses and recoveries relating to acquisition lawsuits; (b) the impact of any expenses related to asset impairment and valuation allowances, the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees, or

58


additional costs, expenses, discounts, make-whole payments, penalties or premiums incurred as a result of early retirement or payment of our debt; (c) the non-cash effect of income tax benefits or expenses, the non-cash impact of changes to our executive equity compensation plan and derivative transactions that have non-cash mark-to-market impacts on our Consolidated Statements of Income; (d) the financial impact of contingent consideration, severance-related costs and charitable donations made to the Ventas Charitable Foundation; (e) gains and losses for non-operational foreign currency hedge agreements and changes in the fair value of financial instruments; (f) gains and losses on non-real estate dispositions and other unusual items related to unconsolidated entities; (g) expenses related to the re-audit and re-review in 2014 of our historical financial statements and related matters; and (h) net expenses or recoveries related to natural disasters. We believe that income from continuing operations is the most comparable GAAP measure because it provides insight into our continuing operations.    


59


The following table summarizes our FFO and normalized FFO for each of the five years ended December 31, 2017. Our normalized FFO for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased over the prior year due primarily to improved property performance and accretive investments.
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands)
Income from continuing operations
$
643,949

 
$
554,209

 
$
389,539

 
$
359,296

 
$
375,498

Discontinued operations
(110
)
 
(922
)
 
11,103

 
99,735

 
79,171

Gain on real estate dispositions
717,273

 
98,203

 
18,580

 
17,970

 

Net income
1,361,112

 
651,490

 
419,222

 
477,001

 
454,669

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
4,642

 
2,259

 
1,379

 
1,234

 
1,160

Net income attributable to common stockholders
1,356,470

 
649,231

 
417,843

 
475,767

 
453,509

Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate depreciation and amortization
881,088

 
891,985

 
887,126

 
718,649

 
624,245

Real estate depreciation related to noncontrolling interests
(7,565
)
 
(7,785
)
 
(7,906
)
 
(10,314
)
 
(10,512
)
Real estate depreciation related to unconsolidated entities
4,231

 
5,754

 
7,353

 
5,792

 
6,543

(Gain) loss on real estate dispositions related to unconsolidated entities
(1,057
)
 
(439
)
 
19

 

 

(Gain) loss on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, net
(3,027
)
 

 
176

 

 
(1,241
)
Gain on real estate dispositions related to noncontrolling interests
18

 

 

 

 

Gain on real estate dispositions
(717,273
)
 
(98,203
)
 
(18,580
)
 
(17,970
)
 

Discontinued operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loss (gain) on real estate dispositions

 
1

 
(231
)
 
(1,494
)
 
(4,059
)
Depreciation on real estate assets

 

 
79,608

 
103,250

 
139,973

FFO attributable to common stockholders
1,512,885

 
1,440,544

 
1,365,408

 
1,273,680

 
1,208,458

Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in fair value of financial instruments
(41
)
 
62

 
460

 
5,121

 
449

Non-cash income tax benefit
(22,387
)
 
(34,227
)
 
(42,384
)
 
(9,431
)
 
(11,828
)
Effect of the 2017 Tax Act
(36,539
)
 

 

 

 

Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
839

 
2,779

 
15,797

 
5,013

 
1,048

Gain on non-real estate dispositions related to unconsolidated entities
(39
)
 
(557
)
 

 

 

Merger-related expenses, deal costs and re-audit costs
14,823

 
28,290

 
152,344

 
54,389

 
21,560

Amortization of other intangibles
1,458

 
1,752

 
2,058

 
1,246

 
1,022

Other items related to unconsolidated entities
3,188

 

 

 

 

Non-cash impact of changes to equity plan
5,453

 

 

 

 

Natural disaster expenses (recoveries), net
11,601

 

 

 

 

Normalized FFO attributable to common stockholders
$
1,491,241

 
$
1,438,643

 
$
1,493,683

 
$
1,330,018

 
$
1,220,709



60


Adjusted EBITDA

We consider Adjusted EBITDA an important supplemental measure because it provides another manner in which to evaluate our operating performance and serves as another indicator of our credit strength and our ability to service our debt obligations. We define Adjusted EBITDA as consolidated earnings, which includes amounts in discontinued operations, before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (including non-cash stock-based compensation expense), excluding gains or losses on extinguishment of debt, our consolidated joint venture partners’ share of EBITDA, merger-related expenses and deal costs, expenses related to the re-audit and re-review in 2014 of our historical financial statements, net gains or losses on real estate activity, gains or losses on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, changes in the fair value of financial instruments, unrealized foreign currency gains or losses and net expenses or recoveries related to natural disasters, and including our share of EBITDA from unconsolidated entities and adjustments for other immaterial or identified items. The following table sets forth a reconciliation of income from continuing operations to Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
(In thousands)
Income from continuing operations
$
643,949

 
$
554,209

 
$
389,539

Discontinued operations
(110
)
 
(922
)
 
11,103

Gain on real estate dispositions
717,273

 
98,203

 
18,580

Net income
1,361,112

 
651,490

 
419,222

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
4,642

 
2,259

 
1,379

Net income attributable to common stockholders
1,356,470

 
649,231

 
417,843

Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
Interest
448,196

 
419,740

 
427,542

Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
754

 
2,779

 
14,411

Taxes (including amounts in general, administrative and professional fees)
(57,307
)
 
(29,129
)
 
(37,112
)
Depreciation and amortization
887,948

 
898,924

 
973,665

Non-cash stock-based compensation expense
26,543

 
20,958

 
19,537

Merger-related expenses, deal costs and re-audit costs
12,653

 
25,141

 
150,290

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of consolidated joint venture partners’ share of EBITDA
(12,975
)
 
(12,654
)
 
(12,722
)
(Income) loss from unconsolidated entities, net of Ventas share of EBITDA from unconsolidated entities
32,219

 
25,246

 
18,806

Gain on real estate dispositions
(717,273
)
 
(98,202
)
 
(18,811
)
Unrealized foreign currency gains
(612
)
 
(1,440
)
 
(1,727
)
Changes in fair value of financial instruments
(61
)
 
51

 
460

(Gain) loss on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, net
(3,027
)
 

 
176

Natural disaster expenses (recoveries), net
11,601

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA
$
1,985,129

 
$
1,900,645

 
$
1,952,358


NOI

We also consider NOI an important supplemental measure because it allows investors, analysts and our management to assess our unlevered property-level operating results and to compare our operating results with those of other real estate companies and between periods on a consistent basis. We define NOI as total revenues, less interest and other income, property-level operating expenses and office building services costs. Cash receipts may differ due to straight-line recognition of certain rental income and the application of other GAAP policies. The following table sets forth a reconciliation of income

61


from continuing operations to NOI for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
(In thousands)
Income from continuing operations
$
643,949

 
$
554,209

 
$
389,539

Discontinued operations
(110
)
 
(922
)
 
11,103

Gain on real estate dispositions
717,273

 
98,203

 
18,580

Net income
1,361,112

 
651,490

 
419,222

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
4,642

 
2,259

 
1,379

Net income attributable to common stockholders
1,356,470

 
649,231

 
417,843

Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
Interest and other income
(6,034
)
 
(876
)
 
(1,115
)
Interest
448,196

 
419,740

 
427,542

Depreciation and amortization
887,948

 
898,924

 
973,665

General, administrative and professional fees
135,490

 
126,875

 
128,044

Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
754

 
2,779

 
14,411

Merger-related expenses and deal costs
10,645

 
25,556

 
149,346

Other
20,052

 
9,988

 
19,577

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
4,642

 
2,259

 
1,499

Loss (income) from unconsolidated entities
561

 
(4,358
)
 
1,420

Income tax benefit
(59,799
)
 
(31,343
)
 
(39,284
)
Gain on real estate dispositions
(717,273
)
 
(98,202
)
 
(18,811
)
NOI (including amounts in discontinued operations)
2,081,652

 
2,000,573

 
2,074,137

Discontinued operations

 

 
(198,996
)
NOI (excluding amounts in discontinued operations)
$
2,081,652

 
$
2,000,573

 
$
1,875,141


Asset/Liability Management

Asset/liability management, a key element of enterprise risk management, is designed to support the achievement of our business strategy, while ensuring that we maintain appropriate and tolerable levels of market risk (primarily interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange risk) and credit risk. Effective management of these risks is a contributing factor to the absolute levels and variability of our FFO and net worth. The following discussion addresses our integrated management of assets and liabilities, including the use of derivative financial instruments.

Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates with respect to borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility and our unsecured term loans, certain of our mortgage loans that are floating rate obligations, mortgage loans receivable that bear interest at floating rates and marketable debt securities. These market risks result primarily from changes in LIBOR rates or prime rates. To manage these risks, we continuously monitor our level of floating rate debt with respect to total debt and other factors, including our assessment of current and future economic conditions.

62


The table below sets forth certain information with respect to our debt, excluding premiums and discounts.
 
As of December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance:
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed rate:
 
 
 
 
 
Senior notes and other, unhedged portion
$
8,218,369

 
$
7,854,264

 
$
7,534,459

Floating to fixed rate swap on term loan
200,000

 
200,000

 

Mortgage loans and other(1)
1,010,517

 
1,426,837

 
1,554,062

Variable rate:
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed to floating rate swap on senior notes
400,000

 

 

Unsecured revolving credit facility
535,832

 
146,538

 
180,683

Unsecured term loans, unhedged portion
700,000

 
1,271,215

 
1,568,477

Secured revolving construction credit facility
2,868

 

 

Mortgage loans and other(1)
298,047

 
292,060

 
433,339

Total
$
11,365,633

 
$
11,190,914

 
$
11,271,020

Percent of total debt:
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed rate:
 
 
 
 
 
Senior notes and other, unhedged portion
72.3
%
 
70.2
%
 
66.9
%
Floating to fixed rate swap on term loan
1.8

 
1.8

 

Mortgage loans and other(1)
8.9

 
12.7

 
13.8

Variable rate:
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed to floating rate swap on senior notes
3.5

 

 

Unsecured revolving credit facility
4.7

 
1.3

 
1.6

Unsecured term loans, unhedged portion
6.2

 
11.4

 
13.9

Secured revolving construction credit facility
0.0

 

 

Mortgage loans and other(1)
2.6

 
2.6

 
3.8

Total
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
Weighted average interest rate at end of period:
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed rate:
 
 
 
 
 
Senior notes and other, unhedged portion
3.7
%
 
3.6
%
 
3.5
%
Floating to fixed rate swap on term loan
2.1

 
2.2

 

Mortgage loans and other(1)
5.2

 
5.6

 
5.7

Variable rate:
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed to floating rate swap on senior notes
2.3

 

 

Unsecured revolving credit facility
2.3

 
1.9

 
1.4

Unsecured term loans, unhedged portion
2.3

 
1.7

 
1.4

Secured revolving construction credit facility
3.1

 

 

Mortgage loans and other(1)
2.9

 
2.1

 
2.0

Total
3.6

 
3.6

 
3.5


(1) 
Excludes mortgage debt of $57.4 million and $22.9 million related to real estate assets classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017 and 2015, respectively. All amounts were included in liabilities related to assets held for sale on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The variable rate debt in the table above reflects, in part, the effect of $549.9 million notional amount of interest rate swaps with maturities ranging from March 2018 to January 2023 that effectively convert fixed rate debt to variable rate debt. In addition, the fixed rate debt in the table above reflects, in part, the effect of $250.9 million notional amount of interest rate

63


swaps with maturities ranging from October 2018 to September 2027, in each case that effectively convert variable rate debt to fixed rate debt.

In February 2016, we entered into a $200 million notional amount interest rate swap with a maturity of August 3, 2020 that effectively converts LIBOR-based floating rate debt to fixed rate debt, setting LIBOR at 1.132% through the maturity date of the swap.

In July 2016, we entered into $225 million notional forward starting swaps that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates between July and the September issuance of 3.25% senior notes due 2026. On the issuance date, we realized a gain of $1.9 million from these swaps that is being recognized over the life of the notes using an effective interest method.

In January and February 2017, we entered into a total of $275 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of April 3, 2017 that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.33%. In March 2017, these swaps were terminated in conjunction with the issuance of the 3.850% senior notes due 2027, which resulted in a $0.8 million gain that is being recognized over the life of the notes using the effective interest method.

In March 2017, we entered into interest rate swaps totaling a notional amount of $400.0 million with a maturity of January 15, 2023, effectively converting fixed rate debt to three month LIBOR-based floating rate debt.  As a result, we will receive a fixed rate on the swap of 3.10% and will pay a floating rate equal to three month LIBOR plus a weighted average swap spread of 0.98%.

In June 2017, we entered into a total of $125 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of January 15, 2018 and a maturity of January 15, 2028, that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.1832%.

In December 2017, we entered into a total of $75 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of February 15, 2018 and a maturity of February 15, 2028, that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt.  The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.3705%

The increase in our outstanding variable rate debt at December 31, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016 is primarily attributable to the $400.0 million notional amount interest rate swap mentioned above and increased borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility, partially offset by term loan repayments.

Pursuant to the terms of certain leases with one of our tenants, if interest rates increase on certain variable rate debt that we have totaling $80.0 million as of December 31, 2017, our tenant is required to pay us additional rent (on a dollar-for-dollar basis) in an amount equal to the increase in interest expense resulting from the increased interest rates. Therefore, the increase in interest expense related to this debt is equally offset by an increase in additional rent due to us from the tenant. Assuming a 100 basis point increase in the weighted average interest rate related to our variable rate debt and assuming no change in our variable rate debt outstanding as of December 31, 2017, interest expense for 2018 would increase by approximately $18.2 million, or $0.05 per diluted common share.

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, our joint venture partners’ aggregate share of total debt was $76.7 million and $80.9 million, respectively, with respect to certain properties we owned through consolidated joint ventures. Total debt does not include our portion of debt related to investments in unconsolidated entities, which was $90.3 million and $122.0 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The fair value of our fixed and variable rate debt is based on current interest rates at which we could obtain similar borrowings. For fixed rate debt, interest rate fluctuations generally affect the fair value, but not our earnings or cash flows. Therefore, interest rate risk does not have a significant impact on our fixed rate debt obligations until their maturity or earlier prepayment and refinancing. If interest rates have risen at the time we seek to refinance our fixed rate debt, whether at maturity or otherwise, our future earnings and cash flows could be adversely affected by additional borrowing costs. Conversely, lower interest rates at the time of refinancing may reduce our overall borrowing costs.

64


To highlight the sensitivity of our fixed rate debt to changes in interest rates, the following summary shows the effects of a hypothetical instantaneous change of 100 basis points in interest rates as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:
 
As of December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
(In thousands)
Gross book value
$
9,428,886

 
$
9,481,101

Fair value(1)
9,640,893

 
9,600,621

Fair value reflecting change in interest rates(1):
 
 
 
-100 basis points
10,148,313

 
10,117,238

+100 basis points
9,184,409

 
9,133,292


(1) 
The change in fair value of our fixed rate debt from December 31, 2016 to December 31, 2017 was due primarily to changes in the fair market value interest rates and 2017 senior note issuances, partially offset by repayments of senior notes and fixed rate mortgage debt.

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the fair value of our secured and non-mortgage loans receivable, based on our estimates of currently prevailing rates for comparable loans, was $1.3 billion and $709.6 million, respectively. See “NOTE 6—LOANS RECEIVABLE AND INVESTMENTS” and “NOTE 11—FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

As a result of our Canadian and United Kingdom operations, we are subject to fluctuations in certain foreign currency exchange rates that may, from time to time, affect our financial condition and operating performance. Based solely on our results for the year ended December 31, 2017 (including the impact of existing hedging arrangements), if the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the British pound and Canadian dollar were to increase or decrease by one standard deviation compared to the average exchange rate during the year, our normalized FFO per share for the year ended December 31, 2017 would decrease or increase, as applicable, by less than $0.01 per share or 0.1%. We will continue to mitigate these risks through a layered approach to hedging looking out for the next year and continual assessment of our foreign operational capital structure. Nevertheless, we cannot assure you that any such fluctuations will not have an effect on our earnings.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the amount of foreign currency translation loss included in accumulated other comprehensive loss on our Consolidated Balance Sheets decreased by $20.6 million, primarily as a result of the remeasurement of our properties located in the United Kingdom.

65


Concentration and Credit Risk

We use concentration ratios to identify, understand and evaluate the potential impact of economic downturns and other adverse events that may affect our asset types, geographic locations, business models, and tenants, operators and managers. We evaluate concentration risk in terms of investment mix and operations mix. Investment mix measures the percentage of our investments that is concentrated in a specific asset type or that is operated or managed by a particular tenant, operator or manager. Operations mix measures the percentage of our operating results that is attributed to a particular tenant, operator or manager, geographic location or business model. The following tables reflect our concentration risk as of the dates and for the periods presented:
 
As of
December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
Investment mix by asset type(1):
 
 
 
Seniors housing communities
60.2
%
 
61.8
%
MOBs
19.7

 
20.7

Life science and innovation centers
7.4

 
6.1

Health systems
5.4

 
5.6

IRFs and LTACs
1.7

 
1.7

SNFs
0.7

 
1.4

Secured loans receivable and investments, net
4.9

 
2.7

Investment mix by tenant, operator and manager(1):
 
 
 
Atria
22.3
%
 
22.6
%
Sunrise
10.8

 
11.3

Brookdale Senior Living
7.5

 
8.1

Ardent
4.9

 
5.1

Kindred
1.1

 
1.8

All other
53.4

 
51.1


(1) 
Ratios are based on the gross book value of consolidated real estate investments (excluding properties classified as held for sale) as of each reporting date.

66


 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Operations mix by tenant and operator and business model:
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues(1):
 
 
 
 
 
Senior living operations
51.6
%
 
53.6
%
 
55.1
%
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
4.7

 
4.8

 
5.3

Ardent
3.1

 
3.1

 
1.3

Kindred
4.7

 
5.4

 
5.7

All others
35.7

 
33.1

 
32.6

Adjusted EBITDA(3):
 
 
 
 
 
Senior living operations
28.7
%
 
30.9
%
 
29.7
%
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
7.6

 
7.9

 
8.2

Ardent
5.1

 
5.1

 
2.0

Kindred
7.7

 
8.9

 
8.8

All others
50.9

 
47.2

 
51.3

NOI(4):
 
 
 
 
 
Senior living operations
28.5
%
 
30.2
%
 
32.1
%
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
8.0

 
8.3

 
9.3

Ardent
5.3

 
5.3

 
2.3

Kindred
8.1

 
9.2

 
9.9

All others
49.9

 
47.0

 
46.4

Operations mix by geographic location(5):
 
 
 
 
 
California
15.3
%
 
15.3
%
 
15.4
%
New York
8.6

 
8.8

 
8.8

Texas
5.8

 
6.3

 
6.1

Illinois
4.8

 
4.9

 
4.9

Florida
4.4

 
4.5

 
4.6

All others
61.1

 
60.2

 
60.2


(1) 
Total revenues include medical office building and other services revenue, revenue from loans and investments and interest and other income (excluding amounts in discontinued operations and including amounts related to assets classified as held for sale).
(2) 
Excludes one seniors housing community included in the senior living operations reportable business segment.
(3) 
Includes amounts in discontinued operations.
(4) 
Excludes amounts in discontinued operations.
(5) 
Ratios are based on total revenues (excluding amounts in discontinued operations and including amounts related to assets classified as held for sale) for each period presented.

See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional disclosure and reconciliations of income from continuing operations, as computed in accordance with GAAP, to Adjusted EBITDA and NOI, respectively.

We derive a significant portion of our revenues by leasing assets under long-term triple-net leases in which the rental rate is generally fixed with annual escalators, subject to certain limitations. Some of our triple-net lease escalators are contingent upon the satisfaction of specified facility revenue parameters or based on increases in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), with caps, floors or collars. We also earn revenues directly from individual residents in our seniors housing communities that are managed by independent operators, such as Atria and Sunrise, and tenants in our office buildings. For the year ended December 31, 2017, 52.9% of our Adjusted EBITDA (including amounts in discontinued operations) was derived from our senior living operations and office operations, for which rental rates may fluctuate more frequently upon lease rollovers and renewals due to shorter term leases and changing economic or market conditions.


67


The concentration of our triple-net leased properties segment revenues and operating income that are attributed to Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred creates credit risk. If any of Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred becomes unable or unwilling to satisfy its obligations to us or to renew its leases with us upon expiration of the terms thereof, our financial condition and results of operations could decline, and our ability to service our indebtedness and to make distributions to our stockholders could be impaired. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Our leases and other agreements with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to satisfy its obligations under our agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and “NOTE 3—CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We regularly monitor and assess any changes in the relative credit risk of our significant tenants, and in particular those tenants that have recourse obligations under our triple-net leases. The ratios and metrics we use to evaluate a significant tenant’s liquidity and creditworthiness depend on facts and circumstances specific to that tenant and the industry or industries in which it operates, including without limitation the tenant’s credit history and economic conditions related to the tenant, its operations and the markets in which the tenant operates, that may vary over time. Among other things, we may (i) review and analyze information regarding the real estate, seniors housing and healthcare industries generally, publicly available information regarding the significant tenant, and information required to be provided by the tenant under the terms of its lease agreements with us, (ii) examine monthly and/or quarterly financial statements of the significant tenant to the extent publicly available or otherwise provided under the terms of our lease agreements, and (iii) participate in periodic discussions and in-person meetings with representatives of the significant tenant.  Using this information, we calculate multiple financial ratios (which may, but do not necessarily, include net debt to EBITDAR or EBITDARM, fixed charge coverage and tangible net worth), after making certain adjustments based on our judgment, and assess other metrics we deem relevant to an understanding of the significant tenant’s credit risk.

Because Atria and Sunrise manage our properties in exchange for the receipt of a management fee from us, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants. However, we rely on our managers’ personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations efficiently and effectively. We also rely on Atria and Sunrise to set appropriate resident fees, to provide accurate property-level financials results for our properties in a timely manner and otherwise operate our seniors housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, including various rights to terminate and exercise remedies under the agreements as provided therein, Atria’s or Sunrise’s failure, inability or unwillingness to satisfy its respective obligations under those agreements, to efficiently and effectively manage our properties or to provide timely and accurate accounting information with respect thereto could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—The properties managed by Atria and Sunrise account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; adverse developments in Atria’s or Sunrise’s business and affairs or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” and “—We have rights to terminate our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise in whole or with respect to specific properties under certain circumstances, and we may be unable to replace Atria or Sunrise if our management agreements are terminated or not renewed” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our 34% ownership interest in Atria entitles us to certain rights and minority protections, as well as the right to appoint two of six members on the Atria Board of Directors.

Triple-Net Lease Expirations

If our tenants are not able or willing to renew our triple-net leases upon expiration, we may be unable to reposition the applicable properties on a timely basis or on the same or better economic terms, if at all. Although our lease expirations are staggered, the non-renewal of some or all of our triple-net leases that expire in any given year could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we had no triple-net lease renewals or expirations without renewal that, in the aggregate, had a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations for that period. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—If we must replace any of our tenants or operators, we might be unable to reposition the properties on as favorable terms, or at all, and we could be subject to delays, limitations and expenses, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” included in Part I, Item IA of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


68


The following table summarizes our triple-net lease expirations currently scheduled to occur over the next ten years (excluding leases related to assets classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017):
 
Number of
Properties
 
2017 Annual Rental Income
 
% of 2017 Total Triple-Net Leased Properties Segment Rental Income
 
(Dollars in thousands)
2018

 
$

 
%
2019
70

 
120,625

 
14.4

2020
42

 
36,129

 
4.3

2021
53

 
52,509

 
6.3

2022
26

 
18,536

 
2.2

2023
10

 
30,542

 
3.6

2024
36

 
22,487

 
2.7

2025
59

 
128,433

 
15.3

2026
47

 
42,632

 
5.1

2027
7

 
8,625

 
1.0


Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2017, we had a total of $81.4 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, operating cash and cash related to our senior living operations and office operations reportable business segments that is deposited and held in property-level accounts. Funds maintained in the property-level accounts are used primarily for the payment of property-level expenses, debt service payments and certain capital expenditures. As of December 31, 2017, we also had escrow deposits and restricted cash of $106.9 million, $2.4 billion of unused borrowing capacity available under our unsecured revolving credit facility and $397.1 million of unused borrowing capacity available under our secured revolving credit facility.

During 2017, our principal sources of liquidity were cash flows from operations, proceeds from the issuance of debt securities, proceeds from asset sales and cash on hand.

For the next 12 months, our principal liquidity needs are to: (i) fund operating expenses; (ii) meet our debt service requirements; (iii) repay maturing mortgage and other debt, including $700.0 million of senior notes; (iv) fund capital expenditures; (v) fund acquisitions, investments and commitments, including development and redevelopment activities; and (vi) make distributions to our stockholders and unitholders, as required for us to continue to qualify as a REIT. In addition, we may elect to prepay outstanding indebtedness prior to maturity based on our analysis of various factors. We expect that these liquidity needs generally will be satisfied by a combination of the following: cash flows from operations, cash on hand, debt assumptions and financings (including secured financings), issuances of debt and equity securities, dispositions of assets (in whole or in part through joint venture arrangements with third parties) and borrowings under our revolving credit facilities. However, an inability to access liquidity through multiple capital sources concurrently could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Capital Structure—Limitations on our ability to access capital could have an adverse effect on our ability to make required payments on our debt obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Credit Facilities and Unsecured Term Loans

    In April 2017, we entered into an unsecured credit facility comprised of a $3.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility, priced at LIBOR plus 0.875%, that replaced our previous $2.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility priced at LIBOR plus 1.0%. The new unsecured credit facility was also comprised of our $200.0 million term loan that was scheduled to mature in 2018 and our $278.6 million term loan that was scheduled to mature in 2019. The 2018 and 2019 term loans were priced at LIBOR plus 1.05%. In August 2017, we used most of the proceeds from the sale of 22 SNFs to repay the balances then outstanding on the 2018 and 2019 term loans, and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.5 million. See "NOTE 5—DISPOSITIONS” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


69


The unsecured revolving credit facility matures in 2021, but may be extended at our option subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions for two additional periods of six months each. The unsecured revolving credit facility also includes an accordion feature that permits us to increase our aggregate borrowing capacity thereunder to up to $3.75 billion.

As of December 31, 2017, we had $535.8 million of borrowings outstanding, $14.5 million of letters of credit outstanding and $2.4 billion of unused borrowing capacity available under our unsecured revolving credit facility.    

As of December 31, 2017, we also had a $900.0 million term loan due 2020 priced at LIBOR plus 0.975%.         

In September 2017, we entered into a new $400.0 million secured revolving construction credit facility which matures in 2022 and will be primarily used to finance life science and innovation center and other construction projects. As of December 31, 2017, we had $2.9 million borrowings outstanding under the secured revolving construction credit facility.

The agreements governing our credit facilities require us to comply with various financial and other restrictive covenants. See “NOTE 10—SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We were in compliance with all of these covenants at December 31, 2017.

Senior Notes

As of December 31, 2017, we had $7.6 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by our subsidiary, Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership (“Ventas Realty”), and guaranteed by Ventas, Inc. outstanding as follows:

$700.0 million principal amount of 2.00% senior notes due 2018 (co-issued with Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation);

$600.0 million principal amount of 4.00% senior notes due 2019 (co-issued with Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation);

$500.0 million principal amount of 2.700% senior notes due 2020 (co-issued with Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation);

$700.0 million principal amount of 4.750% senior notes due 2021 (co-issued with Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation);

$600.0 million principal amount of 4.25% senior notes due 2022 (co-issued with Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation);

$500.0 million principal amount of 3.25% senior notes due 2022 (co-issued with Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation);

$400.0 million principal amount of 3.125% senior notes due 2023;

$400.0 million principal amount of 3.100% senior notes due 2023;

$400.0 million principal amount of 3.750% senior notes due 2024;

$600.0 million principal amount of 3.500% senior notes due 2025;

$500.0 million principal amount of 4.125% senior notes due 2026;

$450.0 million principal amount of 3.25% senior notes due 2026;

$400.0 million principal amount of 3.850% senior notes due 2027;

$258.8 million principal amount of 5.45% senior notes due 2043 (co-issued with Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation);

$300.0 million principal amount of 5.70% senior notes due 2043; and

70


$300.0 million principal amount of 4.375% senior notes due 2045.

As of December 31, 2017, we had $75.4 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes of our subsidiary, Nationwide Health Properties, LLC (“NHP LLC”), as successor to NHP, outstanding as follows:

$52.4 million principal amount of 6.90% senior notes due 2037 (subject to earlier repayment at the option of the holder); and

$23.0 million principal amount of 6.59% senior notes due 2038 (subject to earlier repayment at the option of the holder).

In addition, as of December 31, 2017, we had $0.9 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes of our wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Canada Finance Limited, and guaranteed by Ventas, Inc. outstanding as follows:

$318.0 million (C$400.0 million) principal amount of 3.00% senior notes, series A due 2019;

$198.8 million (C$250.0 million) principal amount of 3.300% senior notes, Series C due 2022;

$218.7 million (C$275.0 million) principal amount of 2.55% senior notes, series D due 2023; and

$198.8 million (C$250.0 million) principal amount of 4.125% senior notes, series B due 2024.

In May 2016, Ventas Realty issued and sold $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.125% senior notes due 2023 at a public offering price equal to 99.343% of par, for total proceeds of $397.4 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.

In June 2016, we redeemed $455.5 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 1.55% senior notes due September 2016 at a public offering price of 100.335% of par, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $2.1 million. The redemption was funded using proceeds from our May 2016 senior note issuance, cash on hand and borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility. In July 2016, we repaid the remaining balance then outstanding of our 1.55% senior notes due September 2016 of $94.5 million and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.3 million.

In September 2016, Ventas Realty issued and sold $450.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.25% senior notes due 2026 at a public offering price equal to 99.811% of par, for total proceeds of $449.1 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.     

In March 2017, Ventas Realty issued and sold $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.100% senior notes due 2023 at a public offering price equal to 99.280% of par, for total proceeds of $397.1 million before the underwriting discount and expenses, and $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.850% senior notes due 2027 at a public offering price equal to 99.196% of par, for total proceeds of $396.8 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.

In April 2017, we repaid in full, at par, $300.0 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 1.250% senior notes due 2017 upon maturity.

In June 2017, Ventas Canada Finance Limited issued and sold C$275.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.55% senior notes, Series D due 2023 at a price equal to 99.954% of par, for total proceeds of C$274.9 million before the agent fees and expenses. The notes were offered on a private placement basis in Canada. We used part of the proceeds to repay C$124.4 million on our unsecured term loan due 2019.

We may, from time to time, seek to retire or purchase our outstanding senior notes for cash or in exchange for equity securities in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions, prospects for future access to capital and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.

The indentures governing our outstanding senior notes require us to comply with various financial and other restrictive covenants. See “NOTE 10—SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We were in compliance with all of these covenants at December 31, 2017.

71


Mortgage Loan Obligations

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, our consolidated aggregate principal amount of mortgage debt outstanding was $1.3 billion and $1.7 billion, of which our share was $1.2 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively.

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we repaid in full mortgage loans in the aggregate principal amounts of $411.4 million, $337.8 million and $461.9 million, respectively.

Under certain circumstances, contractual and legal restrictions, including those contained in the instruments governing our subsidiaries’ outstanding mortgage indebtedness, may restrict our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries for the purpose of meeting our debt service obligations, including our payment guarantees with respect to Ventas Realty’s and Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s senior notes.

See “NOTE 4—ACQUISITIONS OF REAL ESTATE PROPERTY” and “NOTE 10—SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Derivatives and Hedging

In February 2016, we entered into a $200 million notional amount interest rate swap with a maturity of August 3, 2020 that effectively converts LIBOR-based floating rate debt to fixed rate debt, setting LIBOR at 1.132% through the maturity date of the swap.

In July 2016, we entered into $225 million notional forward starting swaps that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates between July and the September issuance of 3.25% senior notes due 2026. On the issuance date, we realized a gain of $1.9 million from these swaps that is being recognized over the life of the notes using an effective interest method.

In January and February 2017, we entered into a total of $275 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of April 3, 2017 that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.33%. In March 2017, these swaps were terminated in conjunction with the issuance of the 3.850% senior notes due 2027, which resulted in a $0.8 million gain that is being recognized over the life of the notes using the effective interest method.

In March 2017, we entered into interest rate swaps totaling a notional amount of $400 million with a maturity of January 15, 2023, effectively converting fixed rate debt to three month LIBOR-based floating rate debt.  As a result, we will receive a fixed rate on the swap of 3.10% and will pay a floating rate equal to three month LIBOR plus a weighted average swap spread of 0.98%.

In June 2017, we entered into a total of $125 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of January 15, 2018 and a maturity of January 15, 2028, that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.1832%.

In December 2017, we entered into a total of $75 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of February 15, 2018 and a maturity of February 15, 2028, that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt.  The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.3705%

Dividends

In order to continue to qualify as a REIT, we must make annual distributions to our stockholders of at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (excluding net capital gain). In addition, we will be subject to income tax at the regular corporate rate to the extent we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, including any net capital gains. In 2017, our Board of Directors declared dividends on our common stock aggregating $3.115 per share, which exceeds 100% of our 2017 estimated taxable income after the use of any net operating loss carryforwards. We paid the first three quarterly installments of our 2017 dividend of $0.775 per share during 2017. In December 2017, we declared the fourth quarter cash dividend on our common stock of $0.79 per share, which was paid in January 2018. We intend to pay dividends greater than 100% of our taxable income, after the use of any net operating loss carryforwards, for 2018.

72


We expect that our cash flows will exceed our REIT taxable income due to depreciation and other non-cash deductions in computing REIT taxable income and that we will be able to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement. However, from time to time, we may not have sufficient cash on hand or other liquid assets to meet this requirement or we may decide to retain cash or distribute such greater amount as may be necessary to avoid income and excise taxation. If we do not have sufficient cash on hand or other liquid assets to enable us to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement, or if we desire to retain cash, we may borrow funds, issue additional equity securities, pay taxable stock dividends, if possible, distribute other property or securities or engage in a transaction intended to enable us to meet the REIT distribution requirements or any combination of the foregoing.

Capital Expenditures

The terms of our triple-net leases generally obligate our tenants to pay all capital expenditures necessary to maintain and improve our triple-net leased properties. However, from time to time, we may fund the capital expenditures for our triple-net leased properties through loans or advances to the tenant, which may increase the amount of rent payable with respect to the properties in certain cases. We may also fund capital expenditures for which we may become responsible upon expiration of our triple-net leases or in the event that our tenants are unable or unwilling to meet their obligations under those leases or capital expenditures related to our senior living operations and office operations reportable business segments. We expect that these liquidity needs generally will be satisfied by a combination of the following: cash flows from operations, cash on hand, debt assumptions and financings (including secured financings), issuances of debt and equity securities, dispositions of assets (in whole or in part through joint venture arrangements with third parties) and borrowings under our revolving credit facilities.

To the extent that unanticipated capital expenditure needs arise or significant borrowings are required, our liquidity may be affected adversely. Our ability to borrow additional funds may be restricted in certain circumstances by the terms of the instruments governing our outstanding indebtedness.

We are party to certain agreements that obligate us to develop seniors housing or healthcare properties funded through capital that we and, in certain circumstances, our joint venture partners provide. As of December 31, 2017, we had 14 properties under development pursuant to these agreements, including four properties that are owned by unconsolidated real estate entities. In addition, from time to time, we engage in redevelopment projects with respect to our existing seniors housing communities to maximize the value, increase NOI, maintain a market-competitive position, achieve property stabilization or change the primary use of the property.

Equity Offerings and Related Events

In March 2015, we replaced our previous shelf registration statement that was scheduled to expire in accordance with the SEC’s rules with a new universal shelf registration statement, rendering our previous ATM program inaccessible. In connection with our new universal shelf registration statement, we established a new ATM program pursuant to which we may sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate of $1.0 billion of our common stock.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, we issued and sold 1.1 million shares of common stock under our ATM equity offering program for aggregate net proceeds of $73.9 million, after sales agent commissions. As of December 31, 2017, approximately $155.6 million of our common stock remained available for sale under our ATM equity offering program.
  
Other

We received proceeds of $16.3 million and $20.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, from the exercises of outstanding stock options. Future proceeds from the exercises of stock options will be affected primarily by the future trading price of our common stock and the number of options outstanding. The number of options outstanding increased to 5.0 million as of December 31, 2017, from 3.8 million as of December 31, 2016. The weighted average exercise price was $58.57 as of December 31, 2017.


73


Cash Flows

The following table sets forth our sources and uses of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
 
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease)
to Cash
 
2017
 
2016
 
$
 
%
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$
286,707

 
$
53,023

 
$
233,684

 
nm

Net cash provided by operating activities
1,442,180

 
1,372,341

 
69,839

 
5.1
%
Net cash used in investing activities
(976,517
)
 
(1,234,643
)
 
258,126

 
20.9

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(671,327
)
 
96,838

 
(768,165
)
 
nm

Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents
312

 
(852
)
 
1,164

 
nm

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
81,355

 
$
286,707

 
(205,352
)
 
(71.6)

nm—not meaningful

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Cash flows from operating activities increased $69.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 over the same period in 2016 due primarily to investments made during 2016 and 2017, partially offset by dispositions during the same periods.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities decreased $258.1 million during 2017 over 2016 primarily due to decreased investment in real estate property during 2017 and proceeds from the 2017 sale of 36 SNFs owned by us and operated by Kindred, partially offset by the $700.0 million term loan we provided in March 2017 to facilitate Ardent’s acquisition of LHP, increases in development project expenditures and investments in unconsolidated entities and decreased loan receivable payments received during 2017.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Cash provided by financing activities decreased $768.2 million during 2017 over 2016 primarily due to increased debt repayments and decreased proceeds from the issuance of common stock during 2017, partially offset by increased senior note issuances and borrowings on our unsecured revolving credit facility during 2017 over 2016.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes the effect that minimum debt (which includes principal and interest payments) and other material noncancelable commitments are expected to have on our cash flow in future periods as of December 31, 2017:
 
Total
 
Less than 1
year(3)
 
1 - 3 years(4)
 
3 - 5 years(5)
 
More than 5
years(6)
 
(In thousands)
Long-term debt obligations (1) (2)
$
14,444,492

 
$
1,214,444

 
$
3,499,792

 
$
3,252,070

 
$
6,478,186

Operating obligations, including ground lease obligations
738,508

 
27,498

 
47,159

 
40,389

 
623,462

Total
$
15,183,000

 
$
1,241,942

 
$
3,546,951

 
$
3,292,459

 
$
7,101,648


(1) 
Amounts represent contractual amounts due, including interest.
(2) 
Interest on variable rate debt was based on forward rates obtained as of December 31, 2017.
(3) 
Includes $700.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 2.00% senior notes due 2018.
(4) 
Includes $600.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 4.00% senior notes due 2019, $318.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.00% senior notes, series A due 2019, $500.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 2.700% senior notes due 2020, and $900.0 million of borrowings under our unsecured term loan due 2020.

74


(5) 
Includes $535.8 million of borrowings outstanding on our unsecured revolving credit facility, $2.9 million of borrowings outstanding on our secured revolving construction credit facility, $700.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 4.750% senior notes due 2021, $600.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 4.25% senior notes due 2022, $500.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.250% senior notes due 2022 and $198.8 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.300% senior notes, Series C due 2022.
(6) 
Includes $4.4 billion aggregate principal amount outstanding of our senior notes maturing between 2023 and 2045. $52.4 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 6.90% senior notes due 2037 are subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, on October 1, 2027, and $23.0 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 6.59% senior notes due 2038 are subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, on July 7 in each of 2018, 2023 and 2028.

As of December 31, 2017, we had $16.8 million of unrecognized tax benefits that are excluded from the table above, as we are unable to make a reasonable reliable estimate of the period of cash settlement, if any, with the respective tax authority.


ITEM 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The information set forth in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Asset/Liability Management” is incorporated by reference into this Item 7A.


75


ITEM 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Ventas, Inc.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules


Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
Schedule IV — Mortgage Loans on Real Estate


76


MANAGEMENT REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.

Management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2017.
 
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report included herein.






77


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the stockholders and board of directors
Ventas, Inc.:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ventas, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and financial statement schedules II, III and IV (collectively, the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 9, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.

Chicago, Illinois
February 9, 2018

78


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING


To the stockholders and board of directors
Ventas, Inc.:
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Ventas, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and financial statement schedules II, III, and IV (collectively, the “consolidated financial statements”), and our report dated February 9, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management Report on the Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that

79


controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 9, 2018


80


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 
As of December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
(In thousands, except per
share amounts)
Assets
 
 
 
Real estate investments:
 
 
 
Land and improvements
$
2,147,621

 
$
2,089,591

Buildings and improvements
22,177,088

 
21,516,396

Construction in progress
343,129

 
210,599

Acquired lease intangibles
1,537,995

 
1,510,629

 
26,205,833

 
25,327,215

Accumulated depreciation and amortization
(5,617,453
)
 
(4,932,461
)
Net real estate property
20,588,380

 
20,394,754

Secured loans receivable and investments, net
1,346,359

 
702,021

Investments in unconsolidated real estate entities
123,639

 
95,921

Net real estate investments
22,058,378

 
21,192,696

Cash and cash equivalents
81,355

 
286,707

Escrow deposits and restricted cash
106,898

 
80,647

Goodwill
1,034,641

 
1,033,225

Assets held for sale
100,324

 
54,961

Other assets
572,945

 
518,364

Total assets
$
23,954,541

 
$
23,166,600

Liabilities and equity
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
Senior notes payable and other debt
$
11,276,062

 
$
11,127,326

Accrued interest
93,958

 
83,762

Accounts payable and other liabilities
1,182,552

 
907,928

Liabilities related to assets held for sale
61,202

 
1,462

Deferred income taxes
250,092

 
316,641

Total liabilities
12,863,866

 
12,437,119

Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests
158,490

 
200,728

Commitments and contingencies

 

Equity:
 
 
 
Ventas stockholders’ equity:
 
 
 
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 10,000 shares authorized, unissued

 

Common stock, $0.25 par value; 600,000 shares authorized, 356,187 and 354,125 shares issued at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively
89,029

 
88,514

Capital in excess of par value
13,053,057

 
12,917,002

Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(35,120
)
 
(57,534
)
Retained earnings (deficit)
(2,240,698
)
 
(2,487,695
)
Treasury stock, 1 share at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively
(42
)
 
(47
)
Total Ventas stockholders’ equity
10,866,226

 
10,460,240

Noncontrolling interests
65,959

 
68,513

Total equity
10,932,185

 
10,528,753

Total liabilities and equity
$
23,954,541

 
$
23,166,600

  See accompanying notes.

81


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
(In thousands, except per share
amounts)
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income:
 
 
 
 
 
Triple-net leased
$
840,131

 
$
845,834

 
$
779,801

Office
753,467

 
630,342

 
566,245

 
1,593,598

 
1,476,176

 
1,346,046

Resident fees and services
1,843,232

 
1,847,306

 
1,811,255

Office building and other services revenue
13,677

 
21,070

 
41,492

Income from loans and investments
117,608

 
98,094

 
86,553

Interest and other income
6,034

 
876

 
1,052

Total revenues
3,574,149

 
3,443,522

 
3,286,398

Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
Interest
448,196

 
419,740

 
367,114

Depreciation and amortization
887,948

 
898,924

 
894,057

Property-level operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
Senior living
1,250,065

 
1,242,978

 
1,209,415

Office
233,007

 
191,784

 
174,225

 
1,483,072

 
1,434,762

 
1,383,640

Office building services costs
3,391

 
7,311

 
26,565

General, administrative and professional fees
135,490

 
126,875

 
128,035

Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
754

 
2,779

 
14,411

Merger-related expenses and deal costs
10,535

 
24,635

 
102,944

Other
20,052

 
9,988

 
17,957

Total expenses
2,989,438

 
2,925,014

 
2,934,723

Income before unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations, real estate dispositions and noncontrolling interests
584,711

 
518,508

 
351,675

(Loss) income from unconsolidated entities
(561
)
 
4,358

 
(1,420
)
Income tax benefit
59,799

 
31,343

 
39,284

Income from continuing operations
643,949

 
554,209

 
389,539

Discontinued operations
(110
)
 
(922
)
 
11,103

Gain on real estate dispositions
717,273

 
98,203

 
18,580

Net income
1,361,112

 
651,490

 
419,222

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
4,642

 
2,259

 
1,379

Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
1,356,470

 
$
649,231

 
$
417,843

Earnings per common share
 
 
 
 
 
Basic:
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations
$
1.81

 
$
1.61

 
$
1.18

Net income attributable to common stockholders
3.82

 
1.88

 
1.26

Diluted:
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations
$
1.80

 
$
1.59

 
$
1.17

Net income attributable to common stockholders
3.78

 
1.86

 
1.25

Weighted average shares used in computing earnings per common share:
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
355,326

 
344,703

 
330,311

Diluted
358,566

 
348,390

 
334,007

  See accompanying notes.

82


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
(In thousands)
Net income
$
1,361,112

 
$
651,490

 
$
419,222

Other comprehensive income (loss):
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation
20,612

 
(52,266
)
 
(14,792
)
Unrealized loss on government-sponsored pooled loan investments
(437
)
 
(310
)
 
(5,236
)
Other
2,239

 
2,607

 
(658
)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
22,414

 
(49,969
)
 
(20,686
)
Comprehensive income
1,383,526

 
601,521

 
398,536

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
4,642

 
2,259

 
1,379

Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders
$
1,378,884

 
$
599,262

 
$
397,157

See accompanying notes.

83



VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
 
Common
Stock Par
Value
 
Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Retained
Earnings
(Deficit)
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Total Ventas
Stockholders’
Equity
 
Non- controlling
Interests
 
Total Equity
 
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Balance at January 1, 2015
$
74,656

 
$
10,119,306

 
$
13,121

 
$
(1,526,388
)
 
$
(511
)
 
$
8,680,184

 
$
74,213

 
$
8,754,397

Net income

 

 

 
417,843

 

 
417,843

 
1,379

 
419,222

Other comprehensive loss

 

 
(20,686
)
 

 

 
(20,686
)
 

 
(20,686
)
Acquisition-related activity
7,103

 
2,209,202

 

 

 

 
2,216,305

 
853

 
2,217,158

Impact of CCP Spin-Off

 
(1,247,356
)
 

 

 

 
(1,247,356
)
 
(4,717
)
 
(1,252,073
)
Net change in noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 
(12,530
)
 
(12,530
)
Dividends to common stockholders—$3.04 per share

 

 

 
(1,003,413
)
 

 
(1,003,413
)
 

 
(1,003,413
)
Issuance of common stock
1,797

 
489,227

 

 

 

 
491,024

 

 
491,024

Issuance of common stock for stock plans
23

 
6,068

 

 

 
5,945

 
12,036

 

 
12,036

Change in redeemable noncontrolling interests

 
(374
)
 

 

 

 
(374
)
 
1,902

 
1,528

Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value

 
7,831

 

 

 

 
7,831

 

 
7,831

Redemption of OP units

 
1,719

 

 

 

 
1,719

 

 
1,719

Grant of restricted stock, net of forfeitures

 
17,215

 

 

 
(8,001
)
 
9,214

 

 
9,214

Balance at December 31, 2015
83,579

 
11,602,838

 
(7,565
)
 
(2,111,958
)
 
(2,567
)
 
9,564,327

 
61,100

 
9,625,427

Net income

 

 

 
649,231

 

 
649,231

 
2,259

 
651,490

Other comprehensive loss

 

 
(49,969
)
 

 

 
(49,969
)
 

 
(49,969
)
Impact of CCP Spin-Off

 
640

 

 

 

 
640

 

 
640

Net change in noncontrolling interests

 
(2,179
)
 

 

 

 
(2,179
)
 
19,008

 
16,829

Dividends to common stockholders—$2.965 per share

 

 

 
(1,024,968
)
 

 
(1,024,968
)
 

 
(1,024,968
)
Issuance of common stock
4,716

 
1,281,947

 

 

 
17

 
1,286,680

 

 
1,286,680

Issuance of common stock for stock plans
99

 
26,594

 

 

 
2,572

 
29,265

 

 
29,265

Change in redeemable noncontrolling interests

 
(1,714
)
 

 

 

 
(1,714
)
 
(13,854
)
 
(15,568
)
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value

 
(21,085
)
 

 

 

 
(21,085
)
 

 
(21,085
)
Redemption of OP units
92

 
22,622

 

 

 
1,098

 
23,812

 

 
23,812

Grant of restricted stock, net of forfeitures
28

 
7,339

 

 

 
(1,167
)
 
6,200

 

 
6,200

Balance at December 31, 2016
88,514

 
12,917,002

 
(57,534
)
 
(2,487,695
)
 
(47
)
 
10,460,240

 
68,513

 
10,528,753

Net income

 

 

 
1,356,470

 

 
1,356,470

 
4,642

 
1,361,112

Other comprehensive income

 

 
22,414

 

 

 
22,414

 

 
22,414

Impact of CCP Spin-Off

 
107

 

 

 

 
107

 

 
107

Net change in noncontrolling interests

 
(1,427
)
 

 

 

 
(1,427
)
 
(13,292
)
 
(14,719
)
Dividends to common stockholders—$3.115 per share

 

 

 
(1,109,473
)
 

 
(1,109,473
)
 

 
(1,109,473
)
Issuance of common stock
276

 
72,618

 

 

 
553

 
73,447

 

 
73,447

Issuance of common stock for stock plans
87

 
21,723

 

 

 
796

 
22,606

 

 
22,606

Change in redeemable noncontrolling interests

 
(850
)
 

 

 

 
(850
)
 
6,096

 
5,246

Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value

 
253

 

 

 

 
253

 

 
253

Redemption of OP units
84

 
19,845

 

 

 
3,207

 
23,136

 

 
23,136

Grant of restricted stock, net of forfeitures
68

 
23,786

 

 

 
(4,551
)
 
19,303

 

 
19,303

Balance at December 31, 2017
$
89,029

 
$
13,053,057

 
$
(35,120
)
 
$
(2,240,698
)
 
$
(42
)
 
$
10,866,226

 
$
65,959

 
$
10,932,185

   See accompanying notes.

84


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
$
1,361,112

 
$
651,490

 
$
419,222

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization (including amounts in discontinued operations)
887,948

 
898,924

 
973,663

Amortization of deferred revenue and lease intangibles, net
(20,537
)
 
(20,336
)
 
(24,129
)
Other non-cash amortization
16,058

 
10,357

 
5,448

Stock-based compensation
26,543

 
20,958

 
19,537

Straight-lining of rental income, net
(23,134
)
 
(27,988
)
 
(33,792
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
754

 
2,779

 
14,411

Gain on real estate dispositions
(717,273
)
 
(98,203
)
 
(18,811
)
Gain on real estate loan investments
(124
)
 
(2,271
)
 

Gain on sale of marketable securities

 

 
(5,800
)
Income tax benefit
(63,599
)
 
(34,227
)
 
(42,384
)
Loss (income) from unconsolidated entities
3,588

 
(4,358
)
 
1,244

(Gain) loss on re-measurement of equity interests upon acquisition, net
(3,027
)
 

 
176

Distributions from unconsolidated entities
4,676

 
7,598

 
23,462

Other
9,240

 
(1,847
)
 
6,517

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
(Increase) decrease in other assets
(15,854
)
 
5,560

 
42,316

Increase in accrued interest
11,068

 
2,604

 
19,995

Decrease in accounts payable and other liabilities
(35,259
)
 
(38,699
)
 
(2,244
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
1,442,180

 
1,372,341

 
1,398,831

Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Net investment in real estate property
(380,232
)
 
(1,429,112
)
 
(2,650,788
)
Investment in loans receivable and other
(748,119
)
 
(158,635
)
 
(171,144
)
Proceeds from real estate disposals
537,431

 
300,561

 
492,408

Proceeds from loans receivable
101,097

 
320,082

 
109,176

Proceeds from sale or maturity of marketable securities

 

 
76,800

Funds held in escrow for future development expenditures

 

 
4,003

Development project expenditures
(299,085
)
 
(143,647
)
 
(119,674
)
Capital expenditures
(132,558
)
 
(117,456
)
 
(107,487
)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities
6,169

 

 

Investment in unconsolidated entities
(61,220
)
 
(6,436
)
 
(56,986
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(976,517
)
 
(1,234,643
)
 
(2,423,692
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Net change in borrowings under revolving credit facilities
384,783

 
(35,637
)
 
(723,457
)
Net cash impact of CCP Spin-Off

 

 
(128,749
)
Proceeds from debt
1,111,649

 
893,218

 
2,512,747

Proceeds from debt related to CCP Spin-Off

 

 
1,400,000

Repayment of debt
(1,369,084
)
 
(1,022,113
)
 
(1,435,596
)
Purchase of noncontrolling interests
(15,809
)
 
(2,846
)
 
(3,819
)
Payment of deferred financing costs
(27,297
)
 
(6,555
)
 
(24,665
)
Issuance of common stock, net
73,596

 
1,286,680

 
491,023

Cash distribution to common stockholders
(827,285
)
 
(1,024,968
)
 
(1,003,413
)
Cash distribution to redeemable OP unitholders
(5,677
)
 
(8,640
)
 
(15,095
)
Purchases of redeemable OP units

 

 
(33,188
)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
4,402

 
7,326

 

Distributions to noncontrolling interests
(11,187
)
 
(6,879
)
 
(12,649
)
Other
10,582

 
17,252

 
(81
)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(671,327
)
 
96,838

 
1,023,058

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(205,664
)
 
234,536

 
(1,803
)
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents
312

 
(852
)
 
(522
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
286,707

 
53,023

 
55,348

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
81,355

 
$
286,707

 
$
53,023


85


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
(In thousands)
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
 
 
 
 
 
Interest paid including swap payments and receipts
$
409,890

 
$
395,138

 
$
391,699

Supplemental schedule of non-cash activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed from acquisitions:
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate investments
$
425,906

 
$
69,092

 
$
2,565,960

Utilization of funds held for an Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 exchange
(286,748
)
 
(6,954
)
 
(8,911
)
Other assets
(3,716
)
 
90,037

 
20,090

Debt
75,231

 
47,641

 
177,857

Other liabilities
70,878

 
72,636

 
54,459

Deferred income tax liability
(14,869
)
 
9,381

 
52,153

Noncontrolling interests
4,202

 
22,517

 
88,085

Equity issued

 

 
2,204,585

Non-cash impact of CCP Spin-Off

 

 
1,256,404

Equity issued for redemption of OP Units and Class C Units
24,002

 
24,318

 

See accompanying notes.

86

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



NOTE 1—DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Ventas, Inc., an S&P 500 company, is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) with a highly diversified portfolio of seniors housing and healthcare properties located throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. As of December 31, 2017, we owned more than 1,200 properties (including properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and properties classified as held for sale), consisting of seniors housing communities, medical office buildings (“MOBs”), life science and innovation centers, inpatient rehabilitation facilities (“IRFs”) and long-term acute care facilities (“LTACs”), health systems and skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”), and we had 14 properties under development, including four properties that are owned by unconsolidated real estate entities. Our company was originally founded in 1983 and is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.

We primarily invest in seniors housing and healthcare properties through acquisitions and lease our properties to unaffiliated tenants or operate them through independent third-party managers. As of December 31, 2017, we leased a total of 546 properties (excluding MOBs) to various healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures.

As of December 31, 2017, pursuant to long-term management agreements, we engaged independent operators, such as Atria Senior Living, Inc. (“Atria”) and Sunrise Senior Living, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Sunrise”), to manage 297 seniors housing communities for us.

Our three largest tenants, Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Brookdale Senior Living”), Ardent Health Partners, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Ardent”) and Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Kindred”) leased from us 135 properties (excluding one property managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to a long-term management agreement), 10 properties and 31 properties (excluding one MOB included within our office operations reportable business segment), respectively, as of December 31, 2017.

Through our Lillibridge Healthcare Services, Inc. subsidiary and our ownership interest in PMB Real Estate Services LLC, we also provide MOB management, leasing, marketing, facility development and advisory services to highly rated hospitals and health systems throughout the United States. In addition, from time to time, we make secured and non-mortgage loans and other investments relating to seniors housing and healthcare operators or properties.

In August 2015, we completed the spin-off of most of our post-acute/skilled nursing facility portfolio into an independent, publicly traded REIT named Care Capital Properties, Inc. (“CCP”) (the “CCP Spin-Off”). The historical results of operations of the CCP properties are presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements. See “NOTE 5—DISPOSITIONS.”

In September 2016, we completed the acquisition of substantially all of the university affiliated life science and innovation real estate assets of Wexford Science & Technology, LLC (“Wexford”) from affiliates of Blackstone Real Estate Partners VIII, L.P. (together with its affiliates, “Blackstone”) (the “Life Sciences Acquisition”). As a result, we renamed our MOB operations reportable business segment “office operations,” which now includes both MOBs and life science and innovation centers.
    

NOTE 2—ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly owned subsidiaries and the joint venture entities over which we exercise control. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation, and our net earnings are reduced by the portion of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests.
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires us to identify entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights and to determine which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). A VIE is broadly defined as an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as

87

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; and (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. We consolidate our investment in a VIE when we determine that we are its primary beneficiary. We may change our original assessment of a VIE upon subsequent events such as the modification of contractual arrangements that affects the characteristics or adequacy of the entity’s equity investments at risk and the disposition of all or a portion of an interest held by the primary beneficiary.
We identify the primary beneficiary of a VIE as the enterprise that has both: (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance; and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the entity. We perform this analysis on an ongoing basis.
As it relates to investments in joint ventures, GAAP may preclude consolidation by the sole general partner in certain circumstances based on the type of rights held by the limited partner(s). We assess limited partners’ rights and their impact on our consolidation conclusions, and we reassess if there is a change to the terms or in the exercisability of the rights of the limited partners, the sole general partner increases or decreases its ownership of limited partnership interests, or there is an increase or decrease in the number of outstanding limited partnership interests. We also apply this guidance to managing member interests in limited liability companies.
We consolidate several VIEs that share the following common characteristics:

the VIE is in the legal form of an LP or LLC;
the VIE was designed to own and manage its underlying real estate investments;
we are the general partner or managing member of the VIE;
we own a majority of the voting interests in the VIE;
a minority of voting interests in the VIE are owned by external third parties, unrelated to us;
the minority owners do not have substantive kick-out or participating rights in the VIE; and
we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE.
We have separately identified certain special purpose entities that were established to allow investments in life science projects by tax credit investors (“TCIs”). We have determined that these special purpose entities are VIEs and that we are the primary beneficiary of the VIEs, and therefore we consolidate these special purpose entities. Our primary beneficiary determination is based upon several factors, including but not limited to the rights we have in directing the activities which most significantly impact the VIEs’ economic performance as well as certain guarantees which protect the TCIs from losses should a tax credit recapture event occur.
In general, the assets of the consolidated VIEs are available only for the settlement of the obligations of the respective entities. Unless otherwise required by the LP or LLC agreement, any mortgage loans of the consolidated VIEs are non-recourse to us. The table below summarizes the total assets and liabilities of our consolidated VIEs as reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
Total Assets
 
Total Liabilities
 
Total Assets
 
Total Liabilities
 
 
(In thousands)
NHP/PMB L.P.
 
$
605,150

 
$
199,958

 
$
639,763

 
$
199,674

Ventas Realty Capital Healthcare Trust Operating Partnership, L.P.
 

 

 
2,143,139

 
162,426

Other identified VIEs
 
1,983,124

 
349,961

 
1,882,336

 
354,034

Tax credit VIEs
 
988,598

 
221,908

 
981,752

 
234,109

Investments in Unconsolidated Entities
We report investments in unconsolidated entities over whose operating and financial policies we have the ability to exercise significant influence under the equity method of accounting. Under this method of accounting, our share of the investee’s earnings or losses is included in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
We base the initial carrying value of investments in unconsolidated entities on the fair value of the assets at the time we acquired the joint venture interest. We estimate fair values for our equity method investments based on discounted cash flow

88

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


models that include all estimated cash inflows and outflows over a specified holding period and, where applicable, any estimated debt premiums or discounts. The capitalization rates, discount rates and credit spreads we use in these models are based upon assumptions that we believe to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective investments.
We generally amortize any difference between our cost basis and the basis reflected at the joint venture level, if any, over the lives of the related assets and liabilities and include that amortization in our share of income or loss from unconsolidated entities. For earnings of equity method investments with pro rata distribution allocations, net income or loss is allocated between the partners in the joint venture based on their respective stated ownership percentages. In other instances, net income or loss is allocated between the partners in the joint venture based on the hypothetical liquidation at book value method (the “HLBV method”). Under the HLBV method, net income or loss is allocated between the partners based on the difference between each partner’s claim on the net assets of the joint venture at the end and beginning of the period, after taking into account contributions and distributions. Each partner’s share of the net assets of the joint venture is calculated as the amount that the partner would receive if the joint venture were to liquidate all of its assets at net book value and distribute the resulting cash to creditors and partners in accordance with their respective priorities. Under this method, in any given period, we could record more or less income than the joint venture has generated, than actual cash distributions received or than the amount we may receive in the event of an actual liquidation.
Redeemable OP Unitholder and Noncontrolling Interests
We own a majority interest in NHP/PMB L.P. (“NHP/PMB”), a limited partnership formed in 2008 to acquire properties from entities affiliated with Pacific Medical Buildings LLC. We consolidate NHP/PMB, as our wholly owned subsidiary is the general partner and the primary beneficiary of this VIE. As of December 31, 2017, third party investors owned 2.7 million Class A limited partnership units in NHP/PMB (“OP Units”), which represented 27.2% of the total units then outstanding, and we owned 7.2 million Class B limited partnership units in NHP/PMB, representing the remaining 72.8%. At any time following the first anniversary of the date of their issuance, the OP Units may be redeemed at the election of the holder for cash or, at our option, 0.9051 shares of our common stock per OP Unit, subject to further adjustment in certain circumstances. We are party by assumption to a registration rights agreement with the holders of the OP Units that requires us, subject to the terms and conditions and certain exceptions set forth therein, to file and maintain a registration statement relating to the issuance of shares of our common stock upon redemption of OP Units.
Prior to January 2017, we owned a majority interest in Ventas Realty Capital Healthcare Trust Operating Partnership, L.P. (“Ventas Realty OP”) and we consolidated this entity, as our wholly owned subsidiary is the general partner, and was the primary beneficiary of this VIE. In January 2017, third party investors redeemed the remaining 341,776 limited partnership units (“Class C Units”) outstanding for 341,776 shares of Ventas common stock, valued at $20.9 million. After giving effect to such redemptions, Ventas Realty OP is our wholly owned subsidiary.
As redemption rights are outside of our control, the redeemable OP Units and Class C Units (together, the “OP Unitholder Interests”) are classified outside of permanent equity on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We reflect the redeemable OP Unitholder Interests at the greater of cost or fair value. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the fair value of the redeemable OP Unitholder Interests was $146.3 million and $177.2 million, respectively. We recognize changes in fair value through capital in excess of par value, net of cash distributions paid and purchases by us of any OP Unitholder Interests. Our diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) includes the effect of any potential shares outstanding from redemption of the OP Unitholder Interests.
Certain noncontrolling interests of other consolidated joint ventures were also classified as redeemable at December 31, 2017 and 2016. Accordingly, we record the carrying amount of these noncontrolling interests at the greater of their initial carrying amount (increased or decreased for the noncontrolling interests’ share of net income or loss and distributions) or the redemption value. Our joint venture partners have certain redemption rights with respect to their noncontrolling interests in these joint ventures that are outside of our control, and the redeemable noncontrolling interests are classified outside of permanent equity on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize changes in the carrying value of redeemable noncontrolling interests through capital in excess of par value.
Noncontrolling Interests
Excluding the redeemable noncontrolling interests described above, we present the portion of any equity that we do not own in entities that we control (and thus consolidate) as noncontrolling interests and classify those interests as a component of consolidated equity, separate from total Ventas stockholders’ equity, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For consolidated joint ventures with pro rata distribution allocations, net income or loss is allocated between the joint venture partners based on their respective stated ownership percentages. In other cases, net income or loss is allocated between the joint venture partners based on the HLBV method. We account for purchases or sales of equity interests that do not result in a change of control as equity transactions, through capital in excess of par value. In addition, we include net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests in net income in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

89

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Accounting for Historic and New Markets Tax Credits
For certain of our life science and innovation centers, we are party to certain contractual arrangements with TCIs that were established to enable the TCIs to receive benefits of historic tax credits (“HTCs”) and/or new market tax credits (“NMTCs”). As of December 31, 2017, we own 11 properties that had syndicated HTCs or NMTCs, or both, to TCIs.
In general, capital contributions are made by TCIs into special purpose entities that invest in entities that own the subject property and generate the tax credits. The TCIs receive substantially all of the tax credits and hold only a noncontrolling interest in the economic risk and benefits of the special purpose entities.
HTCs are delivered to the TCIs upon substantial completion of the project. NMTCs are allowed for up to 39% of a qualified investment and are delivered to the TCIs after the investment has been funded and spent on a qualified business. HTCs are subject to 20% recapture per year beginning one year after the completion of the historic rehabilitation of the subject property. NMTCs are subject to 100% recapture until the end of the seventh year following the qualifying investment. We have provided the TCIs with certain guarantees which protect the TCIs from losses should a tax credit recapture event occur. The contractual arrangements with the TCIs include a put/call provision whereby we may be obligated or entitled to repurchase the ownership interest of the TCIs in the special purpose entities at the end of the tax credit recapture period. We anticipate that either the TCIs will exercise their put rights or we will exercise our call rights prior to the applicable tax credit recapture periods.
The portion of the TCI’s capital contribution that is attributed to the put is recorded at fair value at inception in accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, and is accreted to the expected put price as interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income over the recapture period. The remaining balance of the TCI’s capital contribution is initially recorded in accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and will be relieved upon delivery of the tax credit to the TCI, as a reduction in the carrying value of the subject property, net of allocated expenses. Direct and incremental costs incurred in structuring the transaction are deferred and will be recognized as an increase in the cost basis of the subject property upon the recognition of the related tax credit as discussed above.
Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions regarding future events that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Accounting for Real Estate Acquisitions
On January 1, 2017, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-01, Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”) which narrows the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) definition of a business and provides a framework that gives entities a basis for making reasonable judgments about whether a transaction involves an asset or a business. ASU 2017-01 states that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets, the acquired asset is not a business. If this initial test is not met, an acquired asset cannot be considered a business unless it includes an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output. The primary differences between business combinations and asset acquisitions include recognition of goodwill at the acquisition date and expense recognition for transaction costs as incurred. We are applying ASU 2017-01 prospectively for acquisitions after January 1, 2017.
Regardless of whether an acquisition is considered a business combination or an asset acquisition, we record the cost of the businesses or assets acquired as tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based upon their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. Intangibles primarily include the value of in-place leases and acquired lease contracts.
We estimate the fair value of buildings acquired on an as-if-vacant basis or replacement cost basis and depreciate the building value over the estimated remaining life of the building, generally not to exceed 35 years. We determine the fair value of other fixed assets, such as site improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment, based upon the replacement cost and depreciate such value over the assets’ estimated remaining useful lives as determined at the applicable acquisition date. We determine the value of land either by considering the sales prices of similar properties in recent transactions or based on internal analyses of recently acquired and existing comparable properties within our portfolio. We generally determine the value of construction in progress based upon the replacement cost. However, for certain acquired properties that are part of a ground-up development, we determine fair value by using the same valuation approach as for all other properties and deducting the estimated cost to complete the development. During the remaining construction period, we capitalize project costs until the

90

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


development has reached substantial completion. Construction in progress, including capitalized interest, is not depreciated until the development has reached substantial completion.
The fair value of acquired lease-related intangibles, if any, reflects: (i) the estimated value of any above and/or below market leases, determined by discounting the difference between the estimated market rent and in-place lease rent; and (ii) the estimated value of in-place leases related to the cost to obtain tenants, including leasing commissions, and an estimated value of the absorption period to reflect the value of the rent and recovery costs foregone during a reasonable lease-up period as if the acquired space was vacant. We amortize any acquired lease-related intangibles to revenue or amortization expense over the remaining life of the associated lease plus any assumed bargain renewal periods. If a lease is terminated prior to its stated expiration or not renewed upon expiration, we recognize all unamortized amounts of lease-related intangibles associated with that lease in operations at that time.
We estimate the fair value of purchase option intangible assets and liabilities, if any, by discounting the difference between the applicable property’s acquisition date fair value and an estimate of its future option price. We do not amortize the resulting intangible asset or liability over the term of the lease, but rather adjust the recognized value of the asset or liability upon sale.
We estimate the fair value of tenant or other customer relationships acquired, if any, by considering the nature and extent of existing relationships with the tenant or customer, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant or customer, the tenant’s credit quality, expectations of lease renewals with the tenant, and the potential for significant, additional future leasing arrangements with the tenant, and we amortize that value over the expected life of the associated arrangements or leases, including the remaining terms of the related leases and any expected renewal periods. We estimate the fair value of trade names and trademarks using a royalty rate methodology and amortize that value over the estimated useful life of the trade name or trademark.
In connection with an acquisition, we may assume rights and obligations under certain lease agreements pursuant to which we become the lessee of a given property. We generally assume the lease classification previously determined by the prior lessee absent a modification in the assumed lease agreement. We assess assumed operating leases, including ground leases, to determine whether the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable to us given current market conditions on the acquisition date. To the extent the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable to us relative to market conditions on the acquisition date, we recognize an intangible asset or liability at fair value and amortize that asset or liability to interest or rental expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income over the applicable lease term. We include all lease-related intangible assets and liabilities within acquired lease intangibles and accounts payable and other liabilities, respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We determine the fair value of loans receivable acquired by discounting the estimated future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar loans with the same terms and length to maturity would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings. We do not establish a valuation allowance at the acquisition date because the estimated future cash flows already reflect our judgment regarding their uncertainty. We recognize the difference between the acquisition date fair value and the total expected cash flows as interest income using an effective interest method over the life of the applicable loan. Subsequent to the acquisition date, we evaluate changes regarding the uncertainty of future cash flows and the need for a valuation allowance, as appropriate.
We estimate the fair value of noncontrolling interests assumed consistent with the manner in which we value all of the underlying assets and liabilities.
We calculate the fair value of long-term assumed debt by discounting the remaining contractual cash flows on each instrument at the current market rate for those borrowings, which we approximate based on the rate at which we would expect to incur a replacement instrument on the date of acquisition, and recognize any fair value adjustments related to long-term debt as effective yield adjustments over the remaining term of the instrument.
Impairment of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets
We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets, primarily consisting of investments in real estate, for impairment indicators. If indicators of impairment are present, we evaluate the carrying value of the related real estate investments in relation to the future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying operations. In performing this evaluation, we consider market conditions and our current intentions with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. We adjust the net book value of leased properties and other long-lived assets to fair value if the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows, including sales proceeds, is less than book value. We recognize an impairment loss at the time we make any such determination.

91

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


If impairment indicators arise with respect to intangible assets with finite useful lives, we evaluate impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If estimated future undiscounted net cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, then we estimate the fair value of the asset and compare the estimated fair value to the intangible asset’s carrying value. We recognize any shortfall from carrying value as an impairment loss in the current period.
We evaluate our investments in unconsolidated entities for impairment at least annually, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our investment may exceed its fair value. If we determine that a decline in the fair value of our investment in an unconsolidated entity is other-than-temporary, and if such reduced fair value is below the carrying value, we record an impairment.
We test goodwill for impairment at least annually, and more frequently if indicators arise. We first assess qualitative factors, such as current macroeconomic conditions, state of the equity and capital markets and our overall financial and operating performance, to determine the likelihood that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If we determine it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we proceed with the two-step approach to evaluating impairment. First, we estimate the fair value of the reporting unit and compare it to the reporting unit’s carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds fair value, we proceed with the second step, which requires us to assign the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if it had been acquired in a business combination at the date of the impairment test. The excess fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to the assets and liabilities is the implied value of goodwill and is used to determine the amount of impairment. We recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied value in the current period.
Estimates of fair value used in our evaluation of goodwill (if necessary based on our qualitative assessment), investments in real estate, investments in unconsolidated entities and intangible assets are based upon discounted future cash flow projections or other acceptable valuation techniques that are based, in turn, upon all available evidence including level three inputs, such as revenue and expense growth rates, estimates of future cash flows, capitalization rates, discount rates, general economic conditions and trends, or other available market data. Our ability to accurately predict future operating results and cash flows and to estimate and determine fair values impacts the timing and recognition of impairments. While we believe our assumptions are reasonable, changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on our financial results.
Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations
We sell properties from time to time for various reasons, including favorable market conditions or the exercise of purchase options by tenants. We classify certain long-lived assets as held for sale once the criteria, as defined by GAAP, has been met. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value minus cost to sell and are no longer depreciated. We report discontinued operations when the following criteria are met: (1) a component of an entity or group of components that has been disposed of or classified as held for sale and represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results; or (2) an acquired business that is classified as held for sale on the acquisition date. Assets relating to the CCP Spin-Off were reported as discontinued operations once the transaction was completed. The results of operations for assets meeting the definition of discontinued operations are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Income as discontinued operations for all periods presented. We allocate estimated interest expense to discontinued operations based on property values and our weighted average interest rate or the property’s actual mortgage interest.
Loans Receivable
We record loans receivable, other than those acquired in connection with a business combination, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets (either in secured loans receivable and investments, net or other assets, in the case of non-mortgage loans receivable) at the unpaid principal balance, net of any deferred origination fees, purchase discounts or premiums and valuation allowances. We amortize net deferred origination fees, which are comprised of loan fees collected from the borrower net of certain direct costs, and purchase discounts or premiums over the contractual life of the loan using the effective interest method and immediately recognize in income any unamortized balances if the loan is repaid before its contractual maturity.
We regularly evaluate the collectibility of loans receivable based on factors such as corporate and facility-level financial and operational reports, compliance with financial covenants set forth in the applicable loan agreement, the financial strength of the borrower and any guarantor, the payment history of the borrower and current economic conditions. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due under the terms of the applicable loan agreement, we provide a reserve against the portion of the receivable that we estimate may not be collected.

92

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with a maturity date of three months or less when purchased. These investments are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.
Escrow Deposits and Restricted Cash
Escrow deposits consist of amounts held by us or our lenders to provide for future real estate tax, insurance expenditures and tenant improvements related to our properties and operations. Restricted cash generally represents amounts paid to us for security deposits and other similar purposes.
Deferred Financing Costs
We amortize deferred financing costs, which are reported within senior notes payable and other debt on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, as a component of interest expense over the terms of the related borrowings using a method that approximates a level yield. Amortized costs of approximately $18.9 million, $17.9 million and $18.7 million were included in interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Marketable Debt and Equity Securities
We record marketable debt and equity securities as available-for-sale and classify them as a component of other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets (other than our interests in government-sponsored pooled loan investments, which are classified as secured loans receivable and investments, net on our Consolidated Balance Sheets). We record these securities at fair value and include unrealized gains and losses recorded in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We report interest income, including discount or premium amortization, on marketable debt securities and gains or losses on securities sold, which are based on the specific identification method, in income from loans and investments in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Derivative Instruments
We recognize all derivative instruments in other assets or accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value as of the reporting date. We recognize changes in the fair value of derivative instruments in other expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income or accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, depending on the intended use of the derivative and our designation of the instrument.
We do not use our derivative financial instruments, including interest rate caps, interest rate swaps and foreign currency forward contracts, for trading or speculative purposes. Our foreign currency forward contracts and certain of our interest rate swaps (including the interest rate swap contracts of unconsolidated joint ventures) are designated as effectively hedging the variability of expected cash flows related to their underlying securities and, therefore, also are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value, with changes in the fair value of these instruments recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize our proportionate share of the change in fair value of swap contracts of our unconsolidated joint ventures in accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Certain of our other interest rate swaps and rate caps were not designated as having a hedging relationship with the underlying securities and therefore do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting under GAAP. Accordingly, these interest rate swaps are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value, and we recognize changes in the fair value of these instruments in current earnings (in other expenses) in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Fair Values of Financial Instruments
Fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement, and we determine fair value based on the assumptions that we expect market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within levels one and two of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within level three of the hierarchy).
Level one inputs utilize unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that we have the ability to access. Level two inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in level one that are directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability. Level two inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and other inputs for the asset or liability that are observable at commonly quoted intervals, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates and yield curves. Level three inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which typically are based on our own assumptions, because there is little, if any, related market activity. If the determination of the fair value

93

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the entire fair value measurement falls is the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. If the volume and level of market activity for an asset or liability has decreased significantly relative to the normal market activity for such asset or liability (or similar assets or liabilities), then transactions or quoted prices may not accurately reflect fair value. In addition, if there is evidence that a transaction for an asset or liability is not orderly, little, if any, weight is placed on that transaction price as an indicator of fair value. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
We use the following methods and assumptions in estimating the fair value of our financial instruments.
Cash and cash equivalents - The carrying amount of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.
Escrow deposits and restricted cash - The carrying amount of escrow deposits and restricted cash reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.
Loans receivable - We estimate the fair value of loans receivable using level two and level three inputs. We discount future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar loans with the same terms and length to maturity would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings.
Marketable debt securities - We estimate the fair value of corporate bonds, if any, using level two inputs. We observe quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets that we have the ability to access. We estimate the fair value of certain government-sponsored pooled loan investments using level three inputs. We consider credit spreads, underlying asset performance and credit quality, and default rates.
Derivative instruments - With the assistance of a third party, we estimate the fair value of derivative instruments, including interest rate caps, interest rate swaps, and foreign currency forward contracts using level two inputs.
Interest rate caps - We observe forward yield curves and other relevant information;
Interest rate swaps - We observe alternative financing rates derived from market-based financing rates, forward yield curves and discount rates; and
Foreign currency forward contracts - We estimate the future values of the two currency tranches using forward exchange rates that are based on traded forward points and calculate a present value of the net amount using a discount factor based on observable traded interest rates.
Senior notes payable and other debt - We estimate the fair value of senior notes payable and other debt using level two inputs. We discount the future cash flows using current interest rates at which we could obtain similar borrowings. For mortgage debt, we may estimate fair value using level three inputs, similar to those used in determining fair value of loans receivable (above).
Redeemable OP unitholder interests - We estimate the fair value of our redeemable OP Unitholder Interests using level one inputs. We base fair value on the closing price of our common stock, as OP Units (and previously Class C Units) may be redeemed at the election of the holder for cash or, at our option, shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances.
Revenue Recognition
Triple-Net Leased Properties and Office Operations
Certain of our triple-net leases and most of our MOB and life science and innovation center (collectively, “office operations”) leases provide for periodic and determinable increases in base rent. We recognize base rental revenues under these leases on a straight-line basis over the applicable lease term when collectability is reasonably assured. Recognizing rental income on a straight-line basis generally results in recognized revenues during the first half of a lease term exceeding the cash amounts contractually due from our tenants, creating a straight-line rent receivable that is included in other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, this cumulative excess totaled $267.6 million (net of allowances of $117.8 million) and $244.6 million (net of allowances of $109.8 million), respectively (excluding properties classified as held for sale).
Certain of our leases provide for periodic increases in base rent only if certain revenue parameters or other substantive contingencies are met. We recognize the increased rental revenue under these leases as the related parameters or contingencies are met, rather than on a straight-line basis over the applicable lease term.

94

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Senior Living Operations
We recognize resident fees and services, other than move-in fees, monthly as services are provided. We recognize move-in fees on a straight-line basis over the average resident stay. Our lease agreements with residents generally have terms of 12 to 18 months and are cancelable by the resident upon 30 days’ notice.
Other
We recognize interest income from loans and investments, including discounts and premiums, using the effective interest method when collectibility is reasonably assured. We apply the effective interest method on a loan-by-loan basis and recognize discounts and premiums as yield adjustments over the related loan term. We recognize interest income on an impaired loan to the extent our estimate of the fair value of the collateral is sufficient to support the balance of the loan, other receivables and all related accrued interest. When the balance of the loan, other receivables and all related accrued interest is equal to or less than our estimate of the fair value of the collateral, we recognize interest income on a cash basis. We provide a reserve against an impaired loan to the extent our total investment in the loan exceeds our estimate of the fair value of the loan collateral.
We recognize income from rent, lease termination fees, development services, management advisory services and all other income when all of the following criteria are met in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin 104: (i) the applicable agreement has been fully executed and delivered; (ii) services have been rendered; (iii) the amount is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured.
Allowances
We assess the collectibility of our rent receivables, including straight-line rent receivables. We base our assessment of the collectibility of rent receivables (other than straight-line rent receivables) on several factors, including, among other things, payment history, the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, the value of the underlying collateral, if any, and current economic conditions. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is probable that we will be unable to recover the full value of the receivable, we provide a reserve against the portion of the receivable that we estimate may not be recovered. We base our assessment of the collectibility of straight-line rent receivables on several factors, including, among other things, the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, the historical operations and operating trends of the property, the historical payment pattern of the tenant and the type of property. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is probable that we will be unable to receive the rent payments due in the future, we provide a reserve against the recognized straight-line rent receivable asset for the portion, up to its full value, that we estimate may not be recovered. If we change our assumptions or estimates regarding the collectibility of future rent payments required by a lease, we may adjust our reserve to increase or reduce the rental revenue recognized in the period we make such change in our assumptions or estimates.
Stock-Based Compensation
We recognize share-based payments to employees and directors, including grants of stock options, included in general, administrative and professional fees in our Consolidated Statements of Income generally on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period based on the grant date fair value of the award.
Gain on Sale of Assets
We recognize sales of assets only upon the closing of the transaction with the purchaser. We record payments received from purchasers prior to closing as deposits and classify them as other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize gains (net of any taxes) on assets sold using the full accrual method upon closing if the collectibility of the sales price is reasonably assured, we are not obligated to perform any significant activities after the sale to earn the profit, we have received adequate initial investment from the purchaser and other profit recognition criteria have been satisfied. We may defer recognition of gains in whole or in part until: (i) the profit is determinable, meaning that the collectibility of the sales price is reasonably assured or the amount that will not be collectible can be estimated; and (ii) the earnings process is virtually complete, meaning that we are not obliged to perform any significant activities after the sale to earn the profit.
Federal Income Tax
We have elected to be treated as a REIT under the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), for every year beginning with the year ended December 31, 1999. Accordingly, we generally are not subject to federal income tax on net income that we distribute to our stockholders, provided that we continue to qualify as a REIT. However, with respect to certain of our subsidiaries that have elected to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS” or “TRS entities”), we record income tax expense or benefit, as those entities are subject to federal income tax similar to regular corporations. Certain foreign subsidiaries are subject to foreign income tax, although they did not elect to be treated as TRSs.

95

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


We account for deferred income taxes using the asset and liability method and recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in our financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, we determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Any increase or decrease in the deferred tax liability that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes us to change our judgment about expected future tax consequences of events, is included in the tax provision when such changes occur. Deferred income taxes also reflect the impact of operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance is provided if we believe it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Any increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes us to change our judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset, is included in the tax provision when such changes occur.
We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We recognize interest and penalties, if applicable, related to uncertain tax positions as part of income tax benefit or expense.
Foreign Currency
Certain of our subsidiaries’ functional currencies are the local currencies of their respective foreign jurisdictions. We translate the results of operations of our foreign subsidiaries into U.S. dollars using average rates of exchange in effect during the period, and we translate balance sheet accounts using exchange rates in effect at the end of the period. We record resulting currency translation adjustments in accumulated other comprehensive income, a component of stockholders’ equity, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, and we record foreign currency transaction gains and losses in other expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Segment Reporting
As of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we operated through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and office operations. Under our triple-net leased properties segment, we invest in and own seniors housing and healthcare properties throughout the United States and the United Kingdom and lease those properties to healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses. In our senior living operations segment, we invest in seniors housing communities throughout the United States and Canada and engage independent operators, such as Atria and Sunrise, to manage those communities. In our office operations segment, we primarily acquire, own, develop, lease and manage MOBs and life science and innovation centers throughout the United States. See “NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION.”
Operating Leases
We account for payments made pursuant to operating leases in our Consolidated Statements of Income based on actual rent paid, plus or minus a straight-line rent adjustment for leases that provide for periodic and determinable increases in base rent.
Recently Issued or Adopted Accounting Standards
On January 1, 2017, we adopted ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (“ASU 2016-09”) which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for forfeitures and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. Adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue From Contracts With Customers (“ASU 2014-09”, as codified in “ASC 606”), which outlines a comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. ASC 606 states that “an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.” While ASC 606 specifically references contracts with customers, it also applied to other transactions such as the sale of real estate. ASC 606 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and we plan to adopt ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method.
We have evaluated all of our revenue streams to identify whether each revenue stream would be subject to the provisions of ASC 606 and any differences in the timing, measurement or presentation of revenue recognition. Based on a review of our various revenue streams, we believe the following items in our Consolidated Statements of Income are subject to

96

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


ASC 606: office building and other services revenue, certain elements of our resident fees and services and gains on the sale of real estate. Our office building and other services revenues are primarily generated by management contracts where we provide management, leasing, marketing, facility development and advisory services. Resident fees and services primarily include amounts related to resident leases (subject to ASC 840, Leases) but also includes revenues generated through point-of-sale transactions that are ancillary to the residents’ contractual rights to occupy living and common-area space at the communities. While these revenue streams are subject to the provisions of ASC 606, we believe that the pattern and timing of recognition of income will be consistent with the current accounting model.
As it relates to gains on sale of real estate, we will apply the provisions of ASC 610-20, Gain or Loss From Derecognition of Non-financial Assets (“ASC 610-20”), and we expect to recognize any gains when we transfer control of a property and when it is probable that we will collect substantially all of the related consideration. We will no longer apply existing sales criteria in ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment. We will recognize on January 1, 2018, through a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings, $31.2 million of deferred gains relating to sales of real estate assets in 2015. Other than the cumulative effect adjustment relating to such deferred gains, the adoption of ASC 606 and ASC 610-20 will not have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. Our remaining implementation item includes finalizing revised disclosures in accordance with the new standard.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”), which introduces a lessee model that brings most leases on the balance sheet and, among other changes, eliminates the requirement in current GAAP for an entity to use bright-line tests in determining lease classification. The FASB also issued an Exposure Draft on January 5, 2018 proposing to amend ASU 2016-02, which would provide lessors with a practical expedient, by class of underlying assets, to not separate non-lease components from the related lease components and, instead, to account for those components as a single lease component, if certain criteria are met. ASU 2016-02 and the related Exposure Draft are not effective for us until January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We are continuing to evaluate this guidance and the impact to us, as both lessor and lessee, on our Consolidated Financial Statements. We expect to utilize the practical expedients proposed in the Exposure Draft as part of our adoption of ASU 2016-02.
In 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”), which provides clarification regarding how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows and ASU 2016-18, Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”), which requires an entity to show the changes in total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 and ASU 2016-18 are effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and will be applied by us using a retrospective transition method. Adoption of these standards is not expected to have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory (“ASU 2016-16”), which requires a company to recognize the tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. ASU 2016-16 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and will be applied by us using a modified retrospective method. Adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.


NOTE 3—CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

As of December 31, 2017, Atria, Sunrise, Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred managed or operated approximately 22.3%, 10.8%, 7.5%, 4.9% and 1.1%, respectively, of our consolidated real estate investments based on gross book value (excluding properties classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017). Because Atria and Sunrise manage our properties in exchange for the receipt of a management fee from us, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants.

Based on gross book value, approximately 25.9% and 35.1% of our real estate investments were seniors housing communities included in the triple-net leased properties and senior living operations reportable business segments, respectively (excluding properties classified as held for sale and properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities as of December 31, 2017). MOBs, life science and innovation centers, IRFs and LTACs, health systems, SNFs and secured loans receivable and investments collectively comprised the remaining 39.0%. Our consolidated properties were located in 46 states, the District of Columbia, seven Canadian provinces and the United Kingdom as of December 31, 2017, with properties in one

97

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


state (California) accounting for more than 10% of our total continuing revenues and net operating income (“NOI,” which is defined as total revenues, excluding interest and other income, less property-level operating expenses and office building services costs) for each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

Triple-Net Leased Properties

The following table reflects our concentration risk for the periods presented:
 
For the Year Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Revenues(1):
 
 
 
 
 
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
4.7
%
 
4.8
%
 
5.3
%
Ardent
3.1

 
3.1

 
1.3

Kindred(3)
4.6

 
5.4

 
5.7

NOI:
 
 
 
 
 
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
8.0
%
 
8.3
%
 
9.3
%
Ardent
5.3

 
5.3

 
2.3

Kindred(3)
7.9

 
9.2

 
9.9


(1) 
Total revenues include office building and other services revenue, income from loans and investments and interest and other income.
(2) 
Excludes one seniors housing community included in the senior living operations reportable business segment at December 31, 2017.
(3) 
Excludes one MOB included in the office operations reportable business segment.
    
Each of our leases with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred is a triple-net lease that obligates the tenant to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures, and to comply with the terms of the mortgage financing documents, if any, affecting the properties. In addition, each of our Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred leases has a corporate guaranty. Brookdale Senior Living has multiple leases with us and those leases contain cross-default provisions tied to each other, as well as lease renewals by lease agreement or by pool of assets.

The properties we lease to Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred accounted for a significant portion of our triple-net leased properties segment revenues and NOI for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. If any of Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred becomes unable or unwilling to satisfy its obligations to us or to renew its leases with us upon expiration of the terms thereof, our financial condition and results of operations could decline, and our ability to service our indebtedness and to make distributions to our stockholders could be impaired. We cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable them to satisfy their respective obligations to us, and any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity, our ability to service our indebtedness and other obligations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders, as required for us to continue to qualify as a REIT (a “Material Adverse Effect”). We also cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will elect to renew their respective leases with us upon expiration of the leases or that we will be able to reposition any non-renewed properties on a timely basis or on the same or better economic terms, if at all.

98

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The following table sets forth the future contracted minimum rentals, excluding contingent rent escalations, but including straight-line rent adjustments and reserves where applicable, for all of our consolidated triple-net and office building leases as of December 31, 2017 (excluding properties classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017):
 
Brookdale Senior Living
 
Ardent
 
Kindred
 
Other
 
Total
 
(In thousands)
2018
$
162,346

 
$
113,361

 
$
126,087

 
$
966,445

 
$
1,368,239

2019
151,999

 
113,361

 
126,127

 
912,556

 
1,304,043

2020
35,192

 
113,361

 
126,169

 
860,246

 
1,134,968

2021
14,071

 
113,361

 
126,211

 
799,658

 
1,053,301

2022
3,339

 
113,361

 
126,254

 
699,060

 
942,014

Thereafter
7,498

 
1,435,906

 
247,566

 
3,580,776

 
5,271,746

Total
$
374,445

 
$
2,002,711

 
$
878,414

 
$
7,818,741

 
$
11,074,311


Senior Living Operations

As of December 31, 2017, Atria and Sunrise, collectively, provided comprehensive property management and accounting services with respect to 273 of our 297 seniors housing communities, for which we pay annual management fees pursuant to long-term management agreements.

We rely on our managers’ personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations efficiently and effectively. We also rely on our managers to set appropriate resident fees and otherwise operate our seniors housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, including various rights to terminate and exercise remedies under the agreements as provided therein, Atria’s or Sunrise’s failure, inability or unwillingness to satisfy its respective obligations under those agreements, to efficiently and effectively manage our properties or to provide timely and accurate accounting information with respect thereto could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. In addition, significant changes in Atria’s or Sunrise’s senior management or equity ownership or any adverse developments in their businesses or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Our 34% ownership interest in Atria entitles us to certain rights and minority protections, as well as the right to appoint two of six members on the Atria Board of Directors.

Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred, Atria, Sunrise and Ardent Information

Each of Brookdale Senior Living and Kindred is subject to the reporting requirements of the SEC and is required to file with the SEC annual reports containing audited financial information and quarterly reports containing unaudited financial information. The information related to Brookdale Senior Living and Kindred contained or referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been derived from SEC filings made by Brookdale Senior Living or Kindred, as the case may be, or other publicly available information, or was provided to us by Brookdale Senior Living or Kindred, and we have not verified this information through an independent investigation or otherwise. We have no reason to believe that this information is inaccurate in any material respect, but we cannot assure you of its accuracy. We are providing this data for informational purposes only, and you are encouraged to obtain Brookdale Senior Living’s and Kindred’s publicly available filings, which can be found at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Atria, Sunrise and Ardent are not currently subject to the reporting requirements of the SEC. The information related to Atria, Sunrise and Ardent contained or referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been derived from publicly available information or was provided to us by Atria, Sunrise or Ardent, as the case may be, and we have not verified this information through an independent investigation or otherwise. We have no reason to believe that this information is inaccurate in any material respect, but we cannot assure you of its accuracy.


99

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


NOTE 4—ACQUISITIONS OF REAL ESTATE PROPERTY

The following summarizes our acquisition and development activities during 2017, 2016 and 2015. We acquire and invest in seniors housing and healthcare properties primarily to achieve an expected yield on our investment, to grow and diversify our portfolio and revenue base, and to reduce our dependence on any single tenant, operator or manager, geographic location, asset type, business model or revenue source.

2017 Acquisitions

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we acquired 15 triple-net leased properties (including six assets previously owned by an equity method investee), four properties reported within our office operations reportable business segment (three life science, research and medical assets and one MOB) and three seniors housing communities (reported within our senior living operations reportable business segment) for an aggregate purchase price of $691.3 million. Each of these acquisitions was accounted for as an asset acquisition.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we completed the development of one triple-net leased property, representing $6.9 million of net real estate property on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.    

2016 Acquisitions

Life Sciences Acquisition

In September 2016, we completed the acquisition of substantially all of the university affiliated life science and innovation real estate assets of Wexford from Blackstone for total consideration of $1.5 billion. The properties acquired will continue to be managed by Wexford, which will remain a separate management company owned and operated by the existing Wexford management team. We have exclusive rights to fund and own future life science projects developed by Wexford.

Other 2016 Acquisitions

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we made other investments totaling approximately $42.3 million, including the acquisition of one triple-net leased property and two MOBs.
    
Completed Developments

During 2016, we completed the development of three triple-net leased properties (two of which were expansions of existing seniors housing assets), representing $31.9 million of net real estate property on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016.


100

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Estimated Fair Value

We accounted for our 2016 acquisitions under the acquisition method in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). The following table summarizes the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in our 2016 real estate acquisitions, which we determined using level two and level three inputs:

 
 
Triple-Net Leased Properties
 
Office Operations
 
Total
 
(In thousands)
Land and improvements
 
$
1,579

 
$
63,526

 
$
65,105

Buildings and improvements
 
12,558

 
1,311,676

 
1,324,234

Acquired lease intangibles
 
163

 
200,022

 
200,185

Other assets
 

 
99,777

 
99,777

Total assets acquired
 
14,300

 
1,675,001

 
1,689,301

Notes payable and other debt
 

 
47,641

 
47,641

Intangible liabilities
 

 
103,769

 
103,769

Other liabilities
 
380

 
64,792

 
65,172

Total liabilities assumed
 
380

 
216,202

 
216,582

Noncontrolling interest assumed
 

 
24,656

 
24,656

Net assets acquired
 
13,920

 
1,434,143

 
1,448,063

Cash acquired
 

 
19,119

 
19,119

Total cash used
 
$
13,920

 
$
1,415,024

 
$
1,428,944


For certain acquisitions, the determination of fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed has changed. We made certain adjustments during 2017 due primarily to reclassification adjustments for presentation and adjustments to our valuation assumptions. The changes to our valuation assumptions were based on more accurate information concerning the subject assets and liabilities. None of these changes had a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Aggregate Revenue and NOI

For the year ended December 31, 2016, aggregate revenue and NOI derived from our completed 2016 acquisitions during our period of ownership were $55.7 million and $37.7 million, respectively.

Transaction Costs

Prior to our adoption of ASU 2017-01, transaction costs are expensed as incurred and included in merger-related expenses and deal costs in our Consolidated Statements of Income. During 2016, we expensed as incurred $19.1 million related to our completed 2016 transactions.

2015 Acquisitions

HCT Acquisition

In January 2015, we acquired American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust, Inc. (“HCT”) in a stock and cash transaction, which added 152 properties to our portfolio. At the effective time of the merger, each share of HCT common stock outstanding (other than shares held by us, HCT or our respective subsidiaries, which shares were canceled) was converted into the right to receive either 0.1688 shares of our common stock (with cash paid in lieu of fractional shares) or $11.33 per share in cash, at the election of each HCT shareholder. Shares of HCT common stock for which a valid election was not made were converted into the stock consideration. We funded the transaction through the issuance of approximately 28.4 million shares of our common stock and 1.1 million limited partnership units that were redeemable for shares of our common stock and the payment of approximately $11 million in cash (excluding cash in lieu of fractional shares). In addition, we assumed approximately $167

101

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


million of mortgage debt and repaid approximately $730 million of debt, net of HCT cash on hand. In August 2015, 20 of the properties that we acquired in the HCT acquisition were disposed of as part of the CCP Spin-Off.

Ardent Health Services Acquisition

On August 4, 2015, we completed our acquisition of Ardent Medical Services, Inc. and simultaneous separation and sale of the Ardent hospital operating company to a consortium composed of an entity controlled by Equity Group Investments, Ardent’s management team and us (collectively the “Ardent Transaction”). As of the acquisition date, we recorded the estimated fair value of our investment in owned hospital and other real estate of approximately $1.3 billion. At closing, we paid $26.3 million for our 9.9% interest in Ardent which represents our estimate of the acquisition date fair value of this interest. Upon closing, we entered into a long-term triple-net master lease with Ardent to operate the ten hospital campuses and other real estate we acquired.

Other 2015 Acquisitions

In 2015, we made other investments totaling approximately $612 million, including the acquisition of eleven triple-net
leased properties; nine MOBs (including eight MOBs that we had previously accounted for as investments in unconsolidated entities; see “NOTE 7—INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES”) and 12 skilled nursing facilities (all of which were disposed of as part of the CCP Spin-Off).

Completed Developments

During 2015, we completed the development of one triple-net leased seniors housing community, representing $9.3 million of net real estate property on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2015.

Estimated Fair Value

We accounted for our 2015 acquisitions under the acquisition method in accordance with ASC 805. The following table summarizes the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which we determined using level two and level three inputs:
 
Triple-Net Leased Properties
 
Senior Living Operations
 
Office Operations
 
Total
 
(In thousands)
Land and improvements
$
190,566

 
$
70,713

 
$
173,307

 
$
434,586

Buildings and improvements
1,726,063

 
703,080

 
1,214,546

 
3,643,689

Acquired lease intangibles
169,362

 
83,867

 
184,540

 
437,769

Other assets
174,093

 
272,888

 
402,734

 
849,715

Total assets acquired
2,260,084

 
1,130,548

 
1,975,127

 
5,365,759

Notes payable and other debt

 
77,940

 
99,917

 
177,857

Other liabilities
45,924

 
45,408

 
46,565

 
137,897

Total liabilities assumed
45,924

 
123,348

 
146,482

 
315,754

Net assets acquired
$
2,214,160

 
$
1,007,200

 
$
1,828,645

 
5,050,005

Redeemable OP unitholder interests assumed
 
 
 
 
 
 
88,085

Cash acquired
 
 
 
 
 
 
59,584

Equity issued
 
 
 
 
 
 
2,216,355

Total cash used
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
2,685,981


Included in other assets above is $746.9 million of goodwill, which represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. A substantial amount of this goodwill was due to an increase in our stock price between the announcement date and closing dates of the HCT acquisition. Goodwill has been allocated to our reportable business segments based on the respective fair value of the net assets acquired, as follows: triple-net leased properties - $133.6 million; senior living operations - $219.1 million; and office operations - $394.2 million.


102

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Aggregate Revenue and NOI

For the year ended December 31, 2015, aggregate revenue and NOI derived from our 2015 real estate acquisitions during our period of ownership were $327.0 million and $201.9 million, respectively, excluding revenue and NOI for any assets contributed in the CCP Spin-Off.

Transaction Costs

Prior to our adoption of ASU 2017-01, transaction costs are expensed as incurred and included in merger-related expenses and deal costs in our Consolidated Statements of Income. For the year ending December 31, 2015, we expensed as incurred $99.0 million of costs related to our completed 2015 transactions, $4.1 million of which is reported within discontinued operations. These transaction costs exclude any separation costs associated with the CCP Spin-Off (refer to “NOTE 5—DISPOSITIONS”).


NOTE 5—DISPOSITIONS
2017 Activity

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we sold 53 triple-net leased properties, five MOBs and certain vacant land parcels for aggregate consideration of $870.8 million, and we recognized a gain on the sale of these assets of $717.3 million, net of taxes.

SNF Dispositions

In November 2016, we entered into agreements with Kindred providing that Kindred will either acquire all 36 SNFs owned by us and operated by Kindred (the “Ventas SNFs”) for $700 million, in connection with Kindred’s previously announced plan to exit its SNF business; or, renew the current lease on all unpurchased Ventas SNFs not purchased by Kindred by April 30, 2018 until 2025 at the current rent level plus annual escalations. On June 30, 2017, Kindred announced that it had signed definitive agreements to sell its entire SNF business to an affiliate of Blue Mountain Capital Management, LLC and that, as Kindred closes on the sale of its SNFs, Kindred will pay to us its allocable portion of the sale proceeds for a total of approximately $700 million aggregate purchase price for the Ventas SNFs, and we will convey the applicable Ventas SNFs to the ultimate buyer. 

During 2017, we sold the 36 Ventas SNFs, included in the 53 triple-net properties described above, for aggregate consideration of approximately $700 million and recognized a gain on the sale of these assets of $657.6 million, net of taxes.

2016 Activity

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we sold 29 triple-net leased properties, one seniors housing community included in our senior living operations reportable business segment and six MOBs for aggregate consideration of $300.8 million. We recognized a gain on the sales of these assets of $98.2 million, net of taxes.

2015 Activity

During 2015, we sold 39 triple-net leased properties and 26 MOBs for aggregate consideration of $541.0 million, including lease termination fees of $6.0 million, included within triple-net leased rental income in our Consolidated Statements of Income. We recognized a gain on the sales of these assets of $46.3 million, net of taxes, of which $27.4 million is being deferred due to one secured loan of $78.4 million and one non-mortgage loan of $20.0 million, we made to the buyers in connection with the sales of certain assets.


103

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Assets Held for Sale

The table below summarizes our real estate assets classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, including the amounts reported within other assets and accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
Number of Properties Held for Sale
 
Assets Held for Sale
 
Liabilities Held for Sale
 
Number of Properties Held for Sale
 
Assets Held for Sale
 
Liabilities Held for Sale
 
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Triple-net leased properties
 

 
$

 
$

 

 
$

 
$

Office operations
 
8

 
100,324

 
61,202

 
7

 
53,151

 
1,462

Senior living operations  (1)
 

 

 

 

 
1,810

 

Total
 
8

 
$
100,324

 
$
61,202

 
7

 
$
54,961

 
$
1,462


(1) 
Includes one vacant land parcel classified as held for sale as December 31, 2016, which was sold during 2017.

Real Estate Impairment

We recognized impairments of $37.5 million, $35.2 million and $42.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 respectively, which are recorded primarily as a component of depreciation and amortization and relate primarily to our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment. Our recorded impairments were primarily the result of a change in our intent to hold the impaired assets. In most cases, we recognized an impairment in the periods in which our change in intent was made.

CCP Spin-Off

On August 17, 2015, we completed the CCP Spin-Off. In connection with the CCP Spin-Off, we disposed of 355 triple-net leased skilled nursing facilities and other healthcare assets operated by private regional and local care providers. The CCP Spin-Off was effectuated through a distribution of the common shares of CCP to holders of our common stock as of the distribution record date, and qualified as a tax-free distribution to our stockholders. For every four shares of Ventas common stock held as of the distribution record date of August 10, 2015, Ventas stockholders received one CCP common share on August 17, 2015. On August 17, 2015, just prior to the effective time of the spin-off, CCP (as our then wholly owned subsidiary) received approximately $1.4 billion of proceeds from a recently completed term loan and revolving credit facility. CCP paid us a distribution of $1.3 billion from these proceeds. We used this distribution from CCP to pay down our existing debt of $1.1 billion and to pay for a portion of our quarterly installment of dividends to our stockholders of $0.2 billion.

The historical results of operations of the CCP properties as well as the related assets and liabilities have been presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. Discontinued operations also include separation costs incurred to complete the CCP Spin-Off of $42.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Separation costs for 2015 include $3.5 million of stock-based compensation expense representing the incremental fair value of previously vested stock-based compensation awards as of the spin date. In addition, the assets and liabilities of CCP are presented separately from assets and liabilities from continuing operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows include within operating, investing and financing cash flows those activities which related to our period of ownership of the CCP properties.


104

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The following is a summary of the assets and liabilities of CCP at the CCP Spin-Off date:
 
August 17, 2015
 
(In thousands)
Assets
 
Net real estate investments
$
2,588,255

Cash and cash equivalents
1,749

Goodwill
135,446

Assets held for sale
7,610

Other assets
15,089

Total assets
2,748,149

 
 
Liabilities
 
Accounts payable and other liabilities
217,760

Liabilities related to assets held for sale
985

Total liabilities
218,745

 
 
Net assets
$
2,529,404

Summarized financial information for CCP discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 respectively is as follows:
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
(In thousands)
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$

 
$

 
$
196,848

Income from loans and investments

 

 
2,148

Interest and other income

 

 
63

 

 

 
199,059

Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
Interest

 

 
61,613

Depreciation and amortization

 

 
79,479

General, administrative and professional fees

 

 
9

Merger-related expenses and deal costs
110

 
922

 
46,402

Other

 

 
1,332

 
110

 
922

 
188,835

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations
(110
)
 
(922
)
 
10,224

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 

 
120

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders
$
(110
)
 
$
(922
)
 
$
10,104

Capital and development project expenditures relating to CCP for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $21.8 million. Other than capital and development project expenditures there were no other significant non-cash operating or investing activities relating to CCP.

We and CCP entered into a transition services agreement prior to the CCP Spin-Off pursuant to which we and our subsidiaries provided to CCP, on an interim, transitional basis, various services. The services provided include information technology, accounting and tax services. The overall fee charged by us for such services (the "Service Fee") was $2.5 million for one year. We recognized income of $1.6 million and $0.9 million, for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, relating to the Service Fee, which was payable in four quarterly installments. The transition services agreement terminated on August 31, 2016.



105

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


NOTE 6—LOANS RECEIVABLE AND INVESTMENTS
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, we had $1.4 billion and $754.6 million, respectively, of net loans receivable and investments relating to seniors housing and healthcare operators or properties. The following is a summary of our loans receivable and investments, net as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, including amortized cost, fair value and unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale investments:
 
 
Carrying Amount
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
 
Unrealized Gain
 
 
(In thousands)
As of December 31, 2017:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Secured/mortgage loans and other
 
$
1,291,694

 
$
1,291,694

 
$
1,286,322

 
$

Government-sponsored pooled loan investments(1)
 
54,665

 
53,863

 
54,665

 
802

Total investments reported as Secured loans receivable and investments, net
 
1,346,359

 
1,345,557

 
1,340,987

 
802

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-mortgage loans receivable, net
 
59,857

 
59,857

 
58,849

 

Total investments reported as Other assets
 
59,857

 
59,857

 
58,849

 

Total loans receivable and investments, net
 
$
1,406,216

 
$
1,405,414

 
$
1,399,836

 
$
802

 
 
Carrying Amount
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
 
Unrealized Gain
 
 
(In thousands)
As of December 31, 2016:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Secured/mortgage loans and other
 
$
646,972

 
$
646,972

 
$
655,981

 
$

Government-sponsored pooled loan investments(1)
 
55,049

 
53,810

 
55,049

 
1,239

Total investments reported as Secured loans receivable and investments, net
 
702,021

 
700,782

 
711,030

 
1,239

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-mortgage loans receivable, net
 
52,544

 
52,544

 
53,626

 

Total investments reported as Other assets
 
52,544


52,544


53,626



Total loans receivable and investments, net
 
$
754,565

 
$
753,326

 
$
764,656

 
$
1,239


(1) 
Investments in government-sponsored pooled loans have contractual maturity dates in 2023.

2017 Activity
    
During the year ended December 31, 2017, we received aggregate proceeds of $37.6 million for the partial prepayment and $35.5 million for the full repayment of loans receivable, which resulted in total gains of $0.6 million.    

In March 2017, we provided secured debt financing to a subsidiary of Ardent to facilitate Ardent’s acquisition of LHP Hospital Group, Inc., which included a $700.0 million term loan and a $60.0 million revolving line of credit feature (of which $28.0 million was outstanding at December 31, 2017). The LIBOR-based debt financing has a five-year term, a one-year lock out feature and a weighted average interest rate of approximately 9.3% as of December 31, 2017 and is guaranteed by Ardent’s parent company.

2016 Activity

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we received aggregate proceeds of $309.0 million in final repayment of three secured loans receivable and partial repayment of one secured loan receivable and recognized gains of $9.6 million on the repayment of these loans receivable that are recorded in income from loans and investments in our Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2016.
    

106

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


In February 2016, we made a $140.0 million secured mezzanine loan investment, at par, relating to Class A life sciences properties in California and Massachusetts, that has an annual interest rate of 9.95% and matures in 2021.

In September 2016, we acquired three non-mortgage loans receivable in connection with the Life Sciences Acquisition.


NOTE 7—INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES
We report investments in unconsolidated entities over whose operating and financial policies we have the ability to exercise significant influence under the equity method of accounting. We are not required to consolidate these entities because our joint venture partners have significant participating rights, nor are these entities considered VIEs, as they are controlled by equity holders with sufficient capital. At December 31, 2017, we had 25% ownership interests in joint ventures that owned 31 properties, excluding properties under development. We account for our interests in real estate joint ventures, as well as our 34% interest in Atria and 9.9% interest in Ardent, which are included within other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, under the equity method of accounting.
With the exception of our interests in Atria and Ardent, we provide various services to each unconsolidated entity in exchange for fees and reimbursements. Total management fees earned in connection with these entities were $6.3 million, $6.7 million and $7.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively (which is included in office building and other services revenue in our Consolidated Statements of Income).
In October 2015, we acquired the 95% controlling interests in eight MOBs from a joint venture entity in which we had a 5% interest and that we accounted for as an equity method investment. In connection with this acquisition, we re-measured the fair value of our previously held equity interest and recognized a loss on re-measurement of $0.2 million, which is included in income from unconsolidated entities in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

In February 2017, we acquired the controlling interests in six triple-net leased seniors housing communities for a purchase price of $100.0 million. In connection with this acquisition, we re-measured the fair value of our previously held equity interest, resulting in a gain on re-measurement of $3.0 million, which is included in loss from unconsolidated entities in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Since the above acquisitions, operations relating to these properties have been consolidated in our Consolidated Statements of Income.    


107

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


NOTE 8—INTANGIBLES
The following is a summary of our intangibles as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
Balance
 
Remaining
Weighted Average
Amortization
Period in Years
 
Balance
 
Remaining
Weighted Average
Amortization
Period in Years
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Intangible assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Above market lease intangibles
$
184,775

 
7.0
 
$
184,993

 
6.9
In-place and other lease intangibles
1,353,220

 
23.6
 
1,325,636

 
23.6
Goodwill
1,034,641

 
N/A
 
1,033,225

 
N/A
Other intangibles
35,890

 
12.3
 
35,783

 
11.3
Accumulated amortization
(861,452
)
 
N/A
 
(769,558
)
 
N/A
Net intangible assets
$
1,747,074

 
21.7
 
$
1,810,079

 
21.5
Intangible liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Below market lease intangibles
$
359,099

 
13.7
 
$
345,103

 
14.1
Other lease intangibles
40,141

 
40.8
 
40,843

 
38.5
Accumulated amortization
(160,965
)
 
N/A
 
(133,468
)
 
N/A
Purchase option intangibles
3,568

 
N/A
 
3,568

 
N/A
Net intangible liabilities
$
241,843

 
15.6
 
$
256,046

 
15.9
N/A—Not Applicable 
Above market lease intangibles and in-place and other lease intangibles are included in acquired lease intangibles within real estate investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Other intangibles (including non-compete agreements, trade names and trademarks) are included in other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Below market lease intangibles, other lease intangibles and purchase option intangibles are included in accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, our net amortization related to these intangibles was $67.2 million, $104.5 million and $142.7 million, respectively. The estimated net amortization related to these intangibles for each of the next five years is as follows:
 
Estimated Net Amortization
 
(In thousands)
2018
$
55,591

2019
46,137

2020
40,085

2021
37,180

2022
30,580

The table below reflects the carrying amount of goodwill, by segment, as of December 31, 2017:
 
 
Goodwill
 
 
(In thousands)
Triple-net Leased Properties
 
$
305,261

Senior Living Operations
 
259,482

Office Operations
 
469,898

Total Goodwill
 
$
1,034,641


The $1.4 million increase in goodwill during the year ended December 31, 2017 is entirely the result of foreign currency translation in our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment.


108

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



NOTE 9—OTHER ASSETS
The following is a summary of our other assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:
 
2017
 
2016
 
(In thousands)
Straight-line rent receivables, net
$
267,579

 
$
244,580

Non-mortgage loans receivable, net
59,857

 
52,544

Other intangibles, net
6,496

 
8,190

Investment in unconsolidated operating entities
49,738

 
28,431

Other
189,275

 
184,619

Total other assets
$
572,945

 
$
518,364



109

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


NOTE 10—SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT
The following is a summary of our senior notes payable and other debt as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:
 
2017
 
2016
 
(In thousands)
Unsecured revolving credit facility (1)
$
535,832

 
$
146,538

Secured revolving construction credit facility due 2022
2,868

 

1.250% Senior Notes due 2017

 
300,000

2.00% Senior Notes due 2018
700,000

 
700,000

Unsecured term loan due 2018 (2)

 
200,000

Unsecured term loan due 2019 (2)

 
371,215

4.00% Senior Notes due 2019
600,000

 
600,000

3.00% Senior Notes, Series A due 2019 (3)
318,041

 
297,841

2.700% Senior Notes due 2020
500,000

 
500,000

Unsecured term loan due 2020
900,000

 
900,000

4.750% Senior Notes due 2021
700,000

 
700,000

4.25% Senior Notes due 2022
600,000

 
600,000

3.25% Senior Notes due 2022
500,000

 
500,000

3.300% Senior Notes, Series C due 2022 (3)
198,776

 
186,150

3.125% Senior Notes due 2023
400,000

 
400,000

3.100% Senior Notes due 2023
400,000

 

2.55% Senior Notes, Series D due 2023 (3)
218,653

 

3.750% Senior Notes due 2024
400,000

 
400,000

4.125% Senior Notes, Series B due 2024 (3)
198,776

 
186,150

3.500% Senior Notes due 2025
600,000

 
600,000

4.125% Senior Notes due 2026
500,000

 
500,000

3.25% Senior Notes due 2026
450,000

 
450,000

3.850% Senior Notes due 2027
400,000

 

6.90% Senior Notes due 2037
52,400

 
52,400

6.59% Senior Notes due 2038
22,973

 
22,973

5.45% Senior Notes due 2043
258,750

 
258,750

5.70% Senior Notes due 2043
300,000

 
300,000

4.375% Senior Notes due 2045
300,000

 
300,000

Mortgage loans and other
1,308,564

 
1,718,897

Total
11,365,633

 
11,190,914

Deferred financing costs, net
(73,093
)
 
(61,304
)
Unamortized fair value adjustment
12,139

 
25,224

Unamortized discounts
(28,617
)
 
(27,508
)
Senior notes payable and other debt
$
11,276,062

 
$
11,127,326


(1) 
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, $28.7 million and $146.5 million of aggregate borrowings were denominated in Canadian dollars. Aggregate borrowings of $31.1 million were denominated in British pounds as of December 31, 2017. There were no aggregate borrowings denominated in British pounds as of December 31, 2016.
(2) 
As of December 31, 2016, there was $571.2 million of unsecured term loan borrowings under our unsecured credit facility, of which $92.6 million was in the form of Canadian dollars. In August 2017, we repaid the balances then outstanding on the term loans.
(3) 
These borrowings are in the form of Canadian dollars.


110

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Credit Facilities and Unsecured Term Loans

In April 2017, we entered into an unsecured credit facility comprised of a $3.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility, priced at LIBOR plus 0.875%, that replaced our previous $2.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility priced at LIBOR plus 1.0%. The new unsecured credit facility was also comprised of our $200.0 million term loan that was scheduled to mature in 2018 and our $278.6 million term loan that was scheduled to mature in 2019. The 2018 and 2019 term loans were priced at LIBOR plus 1.05%. In August 2017, we used most of the proceeds from the sale of 22 SNFs to repay the balances then outstanding on the 2018 and 2019 term loans, and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.5 million. See "NOTE 5—DISPOSITIONS”.    

The unsecured revolving credit facility matures in 2021, but may be extended at our option subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions for two additional periods of six months each. The unsecured revolving credit facility also includes an accordion feature that permits us to increase our aggregate borrowing capacity thereunder to up to $3.75 billion.

Our unsecured credit facility imposes certain customary restrictions on us, including restrictions pertaining to: (i) liens; (ii) investments; (iii) the incurrence of additional indebtedness; (iv) mergers and dissolutions; (v) certain dividend, distribution and other payments; (vi) permitted businesses; (vii) transactions with affiliates; (viii) agreements limiting certain liens; and (ix) the maintenance of certain consolidated total leverage, secured debt leverage, unsecured debt leverage and fixed charge coverage ratios and minimum consolidated adjusted net worth, and contains customary events of default.

As of December 31, 2017, we had $535.8 million of borrowings outstanding, $14.5 million of letters of credit outstanding and $2.4 billion of unused borrowing capacity available under our unsecured revolving credit facility.    

As of December 31, 2017, we also had a $900.0 million term loan due 2020 priced at LIBOR plus 0.975%.         

In September 2017, we entered into a new $400.0 million secured revolving construction credit facility which matures in 2022 and will be primarily used to finance life science and innovation center and other construction projects. As of December 31, 2017, there were $2.9 million of borrowings outstanding under the secured revolving construction credit facility.

Senior Notes

As of December 31, 2017, we had outstanding $7.6 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by our subsidiary, Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership (“Ventas Realty”) ($3.9 billion of which was co-issued by Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation), approximately $75.4 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. (“NHP”) and assumed by our subsidiary, Nationwide Health Properties, LLC (“NHP LLC”), as successor to NHP, in connection with our acquisition of NHP, and C$1.2 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by our subsidiary, Ventas Canada Finance Limited. All of the senior notes issued by Ventas Realty and Ventas Canada Finance Limited are unconditionally guaranteed by Ventas, Inc.

In May 2016, Ventas Realty issued and sold $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.125% senior notes due 2023 at a public offering price equal to 99.343% of par, for total proceeds of $397.4 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.

In June 2016, we redeemed $455.5 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 1.55% senior notes due September 2016 at a public offering price of 100.335% of par, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $2.1 million. The redemption was funded using proceeds from our May 2016 senior note issuance, cash on hand and borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility. In July 2016, we repaid the remaining balance then outstanding of our 1.55% senior notes due September 2016 of $94.5 million and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.3 million.

In September 2016, Ventas Realty issued and sold $450.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.25% senior notes due 2026 at a public offering price equal to 99.811% of par, for total proceeds of $449.1 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.

In March 2017, Ventas Realty issued and sold $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.100% senior notes due 2023 at a public offering price equal to 99.280% of par, for total proceeds of $397.1 million before the underwriting discount and expenses, and $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.850% senior notes due 2027 at a public offering price equal to 99.196% of par, for total proceeds of $396.8 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.


111

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


In April 2017, we repaid in full, at par, $300.0 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 1.250% senior notes due 2017 upon maturity.

In June 2017, Ventas Canada Finance Limited issued and sold C$275.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.55% senior notes, Series D due 2023 at a price equal to 99.954% of par, for total proceeds of C$274.9 million before the agent fees and expenses. The notes were offered on a private placement basis in Canada. We used part of the proceeds to repay C$124.4 million on our unsecured term loan due 2019.

Ventas Realty’s senior notes are part of our and Ventas Realty’s general unsecured obligations, ranking equal in right of payment with all of our and Ventas Realty’s existing and future senior obligations and ranking senior in right of payment to all of our and Ventas Realty’s existing and future subordinated indebtedness. However, Ventas Realty’s senior notes are effectively subordinated to our and Ventas Realty’s secured indebtedness, if any, to the extent of the value of the assets securing that indebtedness. Ventas Realty’s senior notes are also structurally subordinated to the preferred equity and indebtedness, whether secured or unsecured, of our subsidiaries (other than Ventas Realty and, with respect to those senior notes co-issued by Ventas Capital Corporation, Ventas Capital Corporation).

Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s senior notes are part of our and Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s general unsecured obligations, ranking equal in right of payment with all of Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s existing and future subordinated indebtedness. However, Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s senior notes are effectively subordinated to our and Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s secured indebtedness, if any, to the extent of the value of the assets securing that indebtedness. Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s senior notes are also structurally subordinated to the preferred equity and indebtedness, whether secured or unsecured, of our subsidiaries (other than Ventas Canada Finance Limited).

NHP LLC’s senior notes are part of NHP LLC’s general unsecured obligations, ranking equal in right of payment with all of NHP LLC’s existing and future senior obligations and ranking senior to all of NHP LLC’s existing and future subordinated indebtedness. However, NHP LLC’s senior notes are effectively subordinated to NHP LLC’s secured indebtedness, if any, to the extent of the value of the assets securing that indebtedness. NHP LLC’s senior notes are also structurally subordinated to the preferred equity and indebtedness, whether secured or unsecured, of its subsidiaries.

Ventas Realty, Ventas Canada Finance Limited and NHP LLC may redeem each series of their respective senior notes (other than NHP LLC’s 6.90% senior notes due 2037 and 6.59% senior notes due 2038), in whole at any time or in part from time to time, prior to maturity at the redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture (which include, in many instances, a make-whole premium), plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date.

NHP LLC’s 6.90% senior notes due 2037 are subject to repurchase at the option of the holders, at par, on October 1, 2027, and its 6.59% senior notes due 2038 are subject to repurchase at the option of the holders, at par, on July 7 in each of 2018, 2023 and 2028.

Mortgages

At December 31, 2017, we had 88 mortgage loans outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $1.3 billion and secured by 88 of our properties. Of these loans, 77 loans in the aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 3.0% to 8.6% per annum, and 11 loans in the aggregate principal amount of $298.0 million bear interest at variable rates ranging from 1.1% to 4.6% per annum as of December 31, 2017. At December 31, 2017, the weighted average annual rate on our fixed rate mortgage loans was 5.2%, and the weighted average annual rate on our variable rate mortgage loans was 2.9%. Our mortgage loans had a weighted average maturity of 5.5 years as of December 31, 2017.

During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we repaid in full mortgage loans in the aggregate principal amount of $411.4 million, $337.8 million and $461.9 million, respectively.
    

112

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Scheduled Maturities of Borrowing Arrangements and Other Provisions

As of December 31, 2017, our indebtedness had the following maturities:
 
Principal Amount
Due at Maturity
 
Unsecured Revolving
Credit
Facility (1)
 
Scheduled Periodic
Amortization
 
Total Maturities
 
(In thousands)
2018
$
785,871

 
$

 
$
21,576

 
$
807,447

2019
1,330,572

 

 
15,759

 
1,346,331

2020
1,451,587

 

 
12,910

 
1,464,497

2021
772,838

 
535,832

 
11,505

 
1,320,175

2022
1,419,392

 

 
9,878

 
1,429,270

Thereafter (2)
4,910,954

 

 
86,959

 
4,997,913

Total maturities
$
10,671,214

 
$
535,832

 
$
158,587

 
$
11,365,633


(1) 
At December 31, 2017, we had $81.4 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, for $454.5 million of net borrowings outstanding under our unsecured revolving credit facility.
(2) 
Includes $52.4 million aggregate principal amount of 6.90% senior notes due 2037 that is subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, on October 1, 2027, and $23.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.59% senior notes due 2038 that is subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, on July 7 in each of 2018, 2023 and 2028.
    
The instruments governing our outstanding indebtedness contain covenants that limit our ability and the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to, among other things: (i) incur debt; (ii) make certain dividends, distributions and investments; (iii) enter into certain transactions; and/or (iv) merge, consolidate or sell certain assets. Ventas Realty’s and Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s senior notes also require us and our subsidiaries to maintain total unencumbered assets of at least 150% of our unsecured debt. Our credit facilities also require us to maintain certain financial covenants pertaining to, among other things, our consolidated total leverage, secured debt, unsecured debt, fixed charge coverage and net worth.

As of December 31, 2017, we were in compliance with all of these covenants.

Derivatives and Hedging

In the normal course of our business, interest rate fluctuations affect future cash flows under our variable rate debt obligations, loans receivable and marketable debt securities and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations affect our operating results. We follow established risk management policies and procedures, including the use of derivative instruments, to mitigate the impact of these risks.

For interest rate exposures, we use derivatives primarily to fix the rate on our variable rate debt and to manage our borrowing costs. We do not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes, and we have a policy of entering into contracts only with major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors. When considered together with the underlying exposure that the derivative is designed to hedge, we do not expect that the use of derivatives in this manner would have any material adverse effect on our future financial condition or results of operations.

As of December 31, 2017, our variable rate debt obligations of $1.9 billion reflect, in part, the effect of $549.9 million notional amount of interest rate swaps with maturities ranging from March 2018 to January 2023 that effectively convert fixed rate debt to variable rate debt. As of December 31, 2017, our fixed rate debt obligations of $9.4 billion reflect, in part, the effect of $250.9 million notional amount of interest rate swaps with maturities ranging from October 2018 to September 2027, in each case that effectively convert variable rate debt to fixed rate debt.

In February 2016, we entered into a $200 million notional amount interest rate swap with a maturity of August 3, 2020 that effectively converts LIBOR-based floating rate debt to fixed rate debt, setting LIBOR at 1.132% through the maturity date of the swap.

In July 2016, we entered into $225 million notional forward starting swaps that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates between July and the September issuance of 3.25% senior notes due 2026. On the issuance date, we realized a gain of $1.9 million from these swaps that is being recognized over the life of the notes using an effective interest method.

113

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


In January and February 2017, we entered into a total of $275 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of April 3, 2017 that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.33%. In March 2017, these swaps were terminated in conjunction with the issuance of the 3.850% senior notes due 2027, which resulted in a $0.8 million gain that is being recognized over the life of the notes using the effective interest method.

In March 2017, we entered into interest rate swaps totaling a notional amount of $400 million with a maturity of January 15, 2023, effectively converting fixed rate debt to three month LIBOR-based floating rate debt.  As a result, we will receive a fixed rate on the swap of 3.10% and will pay a floating rate equal to three month LIBOR plus a weighted average swap spread of 0.98%.

In June 2017, we entered into a total of $125 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of January 15, 2018 and a maturity of January 15, 2028, that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.1832%.

In December 2017, we entered into a total of $75 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of February 15, 2018 and a maturity of February 15, 2028, that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt.  The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.3705%.

Unamortized Fair Value Adjustment

As of December 31, 2017, the unamortized fair value adjustment related to the long-term debt we assumed in connection with various acquisitions was $12.1 million and will be recognized as effective yield adjustments over the remaining terms of the instruments. The estimated aggregate amortization of the fair value adjustment related to long-term debt, which is reflected as a reduction of interest expense, was $5.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. For each of the next five years the estimated aggregate amortization of the fair value adjustment will be as follows:
 
Estimated Aggregate Amortization
 
(In thousands)
2018
$
2,821

2019
2,105

2020
1,664

2021
1,058

2022
646




114



NOTE 11—FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the carrying amounts and fair values of our financial instruments were as follows:
 
2017
 
2016
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
(In thousands)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
81,355

 
$
81,355

 
$
286,707

 
$
286,707

Secured mortgage loans and other, net
1,291,694

 
1,286,322

 
646,972

 
655,981

Non-mortgage loans receivable, net
59,857

 
58,849

 
52,544

 
53,626

Government-sponsored pooled loan investments
54,665

 
54,665

 
55,049

 
55,049

Derivative instruments
7,248

 
7,248

 
3,302

 
3,302

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior notes payable and other debt, gross
11,365,633

 
11,600,750

 
11,190,914

 
11,369,440

Derivative instruments
5,435

 
5,435

 
2,316

 
2,316

Redeemable OP Unitholder Interests
146,252

 
146,252

 
177,177

 
177,177

For a discussion of the assumptions considered, refer to “NOTE 2—ACCOUNTING POLICIES.” The use of different market assumptions and estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the reported estimated fair value amounts. Accordingly, the estimates presented above are not necessarily indicative of the amounts we would realize in a current market exchange.


NOTE 12—STOCK- BASED COMPENSATION
Compensation Plans
We currently have: four plans under which outstanding options to purchase common stock, shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units have been, or may in the future be, granted to our officers, employees and non-employee directors (the 2000 Incentive Compensation Plan (Employee Plan), the 2006 Incentive Plan, the 2006 Stock Plan for Directors, and the 2012 Incentive Plan); one plan under which executive officers may receive common stock in lieu of compensation (the Executive Deferred Stock Compensation Plan); and one plan under which certain non-employee directors have received or may receive common stock in lieu of director fees (the Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan). These plans are referred to collectively as the “Plans.”
During the year ended December 31, 2017, we were permitted to issue shares and grant options, restricted stock and restricted stock units only under the Executive Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, the Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan and the 2012 Incentive Plan. The 2006 Incentive Plan and the 2006 Stock Plan for Directors (collectively, the “2006 Plans”) expired on December 31, 2012, and no additional grants were permitted under those Plans after that date.
The number of shares initially reserved for issuance and the number of shares available for future grants or issuance under these Plans as of December 31, 2017 were as follows:
Executive Deferred Stock Compensation Plan—0.6 million shares were reserved initially for issuance to our executive officers in lieu of the payment of all or a portion of their salary, at their option, and 0.6 million shares were available for future issuance as of December 31, 2017.
Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan—0.6 million shares were reserved initially for issuance to nonemployee directors in lieu of the payment of all or a portion of their retainer and meeting fees, at their option, and 0.5 million shares were available for future issuance as of December 31, 2017.
2012 Incentive Plan—10.5 million shares (plus the number of shares or options outstanding under the 2006 Plans as of December 31, 2012 that were or are subsequently forfeited or expire unexercised) were reserved initially for grants or issuance to employees and non-employee directors, and 4.1 million shares (plus the number of shares or options outstanding under the 2006 Plans as of December 31, 2017 that were or are subsequently forfeited or expire unexercised) were available for future issuance as of December 31, 2017.

115

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Outstanding options issued under the Plans are exercisable at the market price on the date of grant, expire ten years from the date of grant, and vest or have vested over periods of two or three years. If provided in the applicable Plan or award agreement, the vesting of stock options may accelerate upon a change of control (as defined in the applicable Plan) of Ventas, Inc. and other specified events.
On January 18, 2017, the Executive Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) of our Board of Directors approved a 2017 long-term incentive compensation program for our named executive officers (the “2017 LTIP”) pursuant to the 2012 Incentive Plan. Several changes were made covering 2017, including: (1) in prior years, long-term incentive compensation awards were granted following and based on the satisfaction of specified performance goals (i.e., “retrospective”), and in 2017, performance-based awards made pursuant to the 2017 LTIP generally will be earned at a higher or lower level based on future performance (i.e., “prospective”); and (2) certain transition awards and modified vesting provisions apply. Under the 2017 LTIP, the aggregate target award value for each named executive officer is allocated such that 60% of the value is performance-based, in the form of performance-based restricted stock units, and 40% of the value is in the form of time-based restricted stock units. The Compensation Committee eliminated qualitative or discretionary goals from the 2017 LTIP, which previously comprised 50% of the award opportunity.

Stock Options
In determining the estimated fair value of our stock options as of the date of grant, we used the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Risk-free interest rate
1.69-1.87%

 
0.93-1.27%

 
1.02 - 1.38%

Dividend yield
6.00
%
 
5.50
%
 
5.00
%
Volatility factors of the expected market price for our common stock
21.5-21.6%

 
19.1-20.6%

 
19.0 - 20.0%

Weighted average expected life of options
4.0 years

 
4.0 years

 
4.0 years

The following is a summary of stock option activity in 2017:
 
Shares (000’s)
 
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years)
 
Intrinsic
Value
($000’s)
Outstanding as of December 31, 2016
3,805

 
$
56.05

 
 
 
 

Options granted
1,626

 
61.93

 
 
 
 

Options exercised
(349
)
 
46.70

 
 
 
 

Options forfeited
(57
)
 
58.87

 
 
 
 
Outstanding as of December 31, 2017
5,025

 
58.57

 
7.2
 
$
19,522

Exercisable as of December 31, 2017
3,407

 
$
57.01

 
6.5
 
$
18,602

Compensation costs for all share-based awards are based on the grant date fair value and are recognized on a straight-line basis during the requisite service periods, with charges recorded in general and administrative expenses. Compensation costs related to stock options for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were $4.8 million, $6.2 million and $4.2 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2017, we had $2.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options granted under the Plans. We expect to recognize that cost over a weighted average period of 1.20 years.
The weighted average grant date fair value per share of options issued during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $5.23, $4.73 and $5.89, respectively.
Aggregate proceeds received from options exercised under the Plans for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were $16.3 million, $20.4 million and $6.4 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value at exercise of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $7.0 million, $8.0 million and $4.7 million, respectively. There was no deferred income tax benefit for stock options exercised.


116

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units    

We recognize the fair value of shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units on the grant date of the award as stock-based compensation expense over the requisite service period, with charges to general and administrative expenses of $21.7 million, $14.7 million and $15.2 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Restricted stock and restricted stock units generally vest over periods ranging from two to five years. If provided in the applicable Plan or award agreement, the vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units may accelerate upon a change of control (as defined in the applicable Plan) of Ventas and other specified events.
    
A summary of the status of our non-vested restricted stock and restricted stock units as of December 31, 2017, and changes during the year ended December 31, 2017 follows:
 
Restricted
Stock
(000’s)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
Restricted
Stock Units (000’s)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Nonvested at December 31, 2016
312

 
$
57.29

 
15

 
$
58.70

Granted
283

 
59.99

 
409

 
62.07

Vested
(258
)
 
58.82

 
(10
)
 
59.59

Forfeited
(18
)
 
58.95

 

 

Nonvested at December 31, 2017
319

 
$
58.36

 
414

 
$
62.01

    
As of December 31, 2017, we had $22.5 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock and restricted stock units under the Plans. We expect to recognize that cost over a weighted average period of 1.54 years. The total fair value at the vesting date for restricted stock and restricted stock units that vested during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $16.6 million, $13.9 million and $18.3 million, respectively.

Employee and Director Stock Purchase Plan

We have in effect an Employee and Director Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) under which our employees and directors may purchase shares of our common stock at a discount. Pursuant to the terms of the ESPP, on each purchase date, participants may purchase shares of common stock at a price not less than 90% of the market price on that date (with respect to the employee tax-favored portion of the plan) and not less than 95% of the market price on that date (with respect to the additional employee and director portion of the plan). We initially reserved 3.0 million shares for issuance under the ESPP. As of December 31, 2017, 0.1 million shares had been purchased under the ESPP and 2.9 million shares were available for future issuance.
   
Employee Benefit Plan
    
We maintain a 401(k) plan that allows eligible employees to defer compensation subject to certain limitations imposed by the Code. In 2017, we made contributions for each qualifying employee of up to 3.5% of his or her salary, subject to certain limitations. During 2017, 2016 and 2015, our aggregate contributions were approximately $1.4 million, $1.3 million and $1.2 million, respectively.

NOTE 13—INCOME TAXES

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the applicable provisions of the Code for every year beginning with the year ended December 31, 1999. We have also elected for certain of our subsidiaries to be treated as TRS entities, which are subject to federal, state and foreign income taxes. All entities other than the TRS entities are collectively referred to as the “REIT” within this Note. Certain REIT entities are subject to foreign income tax.


117

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Although we intend to continue to operate in a manner that will enable us to qualify as a REIT, such qualification depends upon our ability to meet, on a continuing basis, various distribution, stock ownership and other tests. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, our tax treatment of distributions per common share was as follows:
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Tax treatment of distributions:
 
 
 
 
 
Ordinary income
$
1.02814

 
$
2.68216

 
$
3.02368

Qualified ordinary income
0.00337

 
0.05794

 
0.01632

Long-term capital gain
1.07836

 
0.11613

 

Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain
0.21513

 
0.10877

 

Distribution reported for 1099-DIV purposes
$
2.32500

 
$
2.96500

 
$
3.04000

Add: Dividend declared in current year and taxable in following year
0.79000

 

 

Distribution declared per common share outstanding
$
3.11500

 
$
2.96500

 
$
3.04000


We believe we have met the annual REIT distribution requirement by payment of at least 90% of our estimated taxable income for 2017, 2016 and 2015. Our consolidated benefit for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was as follows:
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
(In thousands)
Current - Federal
$
(5,672
)
 
$
(2,991
)
 
$
138

Current - State
1,119

 
1,241

 
1,453

Deferred - Federal
(54,396
)
 
(19,539
)
 
(25,962
)
Deferred - State
3,237

 
(3,634
)
 
(3,054
)
Current - Foreign
2,307

 
1,067

 
953

Deferred - Foreign
(6,394
)
 
(7,487
)
 
(12,812
)
Total
$
(59,799
)
 
$
(31,343
)
 
$
(39,284
)

The 2017 income tax benefit is primarily due to accounting for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “2017 Tax Act”), specifically a $64.5 million benefit from the reduced U.S. federal corporate tax rate on net deferred tax liabilities and an offsetting expense of $23.3 million to establish a valuation allowance on deferred interest carryforwards, losses of certain TRS entities and the release of a tax reserve. The 2016 income tax benefit was due primarily to losses of certain TRS entities, the reversal of a net deferred tax liability at one TRS and the release of a tax reserve.

Although the TRS entities have paid minimal cash federal income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2017, their federal income tax liabilities may increase in future years as we exhaust net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards and as our senior living and other business segments grow. Such increases could be significant.


118

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


A reconciliation of income tax expense and benefit, which is computed by applying the federal corporate tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, to the income tax benefit is as follows:
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
(In thousands)
Tax at statutory rate on earnings from continuing operations before unconsolidated entities, noncontrolling interest and income taxes
$
204,742

 
$
181,478

 
$
123,086

State income taxes, net of federal benefit
(1,115
)
 
(1,022
)
 
(657
)
Increase in valuation allowance from ordinary operations
8,237

 
3,921

 
20,978

Decrease in ASC 740 income tax liability
(4,750
)
 
(3,582
)
 
(462
)
Tax at statutory rate on earnings not subject to federal income taxes
(231,379
)
 
(209,204
)
 
(185,648
)
Foreign rate differential and foreign taxes
6,407

 
2,094

 
3,095

Change in tax status of TRS
(690
)
 
(5,629
)
 

Effect of the 2017 Tax Act
(41,212
)
 

 

Other differences
(39
)
 
601

 
324

Income tax benefit
$
(59,799
)
 
$
(31,343
)
 
$
(39,284
)
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017
On December 22, 2017, the 2017 Tax Act was signed into law making significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code.  The changes to existing U.S. tax laws as a result of the 2017 Tax Act, which we believe have the most significant impact on the Company’s federal income taxes are as follows:

The 2017 Tax Act reduces the corporate tax rate to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. Consequently, the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities were remeasured to reflect the reduction in the U.S. corporate income tax rate. We have recorded a decrease related to TRS net deferred tax liabilities of $19.9 million and a decrease to the associated valuation allowances of $44.6 million, with a corresponding net adjustment to deferred income tax benefit of $64.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.

The 2017 Tax Act amended the interest expense limitation rules applicable to business entities. An election is available under the 2017 Tax Act to be excluded from the new interest limitation provision for “real property trade or businesses.” We have made a reasonable estimate that the new interest limitation rules may disallow the deferred interest carried forward under the rules prior to the 2017 Tax Act. Consequently, we have recorded a provisional adjustment of $23.3 million for the entire deferred tax asset related to the existing deferred interest carryforward. We will recognize any changes to provisional amounts as we continue to analyze the existing statute or as additional guidance becomes available. We expect to complete our analysis of the provisional amounts by the end of 2018.

The 2017 Tax Act requires a one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative foreign earnings as of December 31, 2017. The Company believes that no such tax will be due as there are no accumulated foreign earnings applicable to the mandatory deemed repatriation.

We did not identify items for which the income tax effects of the 2017 Tax Act have not been completed and a reasonable estimate could not be determined as of December 31, 2017. Our analysis of the 2017 Tax Act may be impacted by new legislation, the Congressional Joint Committee Staff, Treasury, or other guidance.  Based on the 2017 Tax Act as enacted, we do not believe there will be further material impacts to the financial statements related to the other 2017 Tax Act provisions but cannot assure you as to the outcome of this matter.


119

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Each TRS is a tax paying component for purposes of classifying deferred tax assets and liabilities. The tax effects of temporary differences and carryforwards included in the net deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 are summarized as follows:
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
(In thousands)
Property, primarily differences in depreciation and amortization, the tax basis of land assets and the treatment of interests and certain costs
$
(300,395
)
 
$
(409,803
)
 
$
(413,566
)
Operating loss and interest deduction carryforwards
146,732

 
195,415

 
180,575

Expense accruals and other
12,890

 
18,185

 
14,624

Valuation allowance
(109,319
)
 
(120,438
)
 
(120,015
)
Net deferred tax liabilities
$
(250,092
)
 
$
(316,641
)
 
$
(338,382
)

We established beginning net deferred tax assets and liabilities related to temporary differences between the financial reporting and the tax bases of assets acquired and liabilities assumed (primarily property, intangible and related assets, net of NOL carryforwards), for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, in connection with the following acquisitions:
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
(In thousands)
2015 HCT acquisition
$

 
$

 
$
(32,336
)
2015 UK acquisition

 

 
(18,569
)
2016 Life Sciences Acquisition
19,262

 
(9,446
)
 

2017 miscellaneous acquisitions
(4,510
)
 

 

Established beginning deferred tax assets or liabilities
$
14,752

 
$
(9,446
)
 
$
(50,905
)

Our net deferred tax liability decreased $66.5 million during 2017 primarily due to accounting for the 2017 Tax Act, specifically a $64.5 million benefit from the reduced U.S. federal corporate tax rate on net deferred tax liabilities and an offsetting expense of $23.3 million to establish a provisional adjustment on deferred interest carryforwards, the impact of TRS operating losses, currency translation adjustments, and purchase accounting adjustments. Our net deferred tax liability decreased $21.7 million during 2016 primarily due to the reversal of a net deferred tax liability at one TRS and the impact of TRS operating losses and currency translation adjustments, offset by $9.4 million of recorded deferred tax liability as a result of the Life Sciences Acquisition.

Due to uncertainty regarding the realization of certain deferred tax assets, we have established valuation allowances, primarily in connection with the NOL carryforwards related to certain TRSs.  The amounts related to NOLs at the TRS entities for 2017, 2016, and 2015 are $67.1 million, $84.7 million and $85.5 million, respectively.


120

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


A rollforward of valuation allowances, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, is as follows:
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
(In thousands)
Beginning Balance
$
120,438

 
$
120,015

 
$
97,550

Additions:
 
 
 
 
 
Purchase accounting

 

 
1,002

Expenses(1)
9,277

 
6,589

 
21,375

Subtractions:
 
 
 
 
 
Deductions(1)
(1,040
)
 
(2,668
)
 
(397
)
Effect of the 2017 Tax Act
(21,321
)
 

 

State income tax, net of federal impact
956

 
536

 
529

Other activity (not resulting in expense or deduction)
1,009

 
(4,034
)
 
(44
)
Ending balance
$
109,319

 
$
120,438

 
$
120,015


(1) 
Generally, Expenses and Deductions are increases and decreases, respectively, in TRS valuation allowances, the latter being through utilization or release. The net amount equals the increase in valuation allowance on the reconciliation of income tax expense and benefit schedule above.
    
We are subject to corporate level taxes (“built-in gains tax”) for any asset dispositions during the five-year period immediately after the assets were owned by a C corporation (either prior to our REIT election, through stock acquisition or merger). The amount of income potentially subject to built-in gains tax is generally equal to the lesser of the excess of the fair value of the asset over its adjusted tax basis as of the date it became a REIT asset or the actual amount of gain. Some, but not all, future gains could be offset by available NOL carryforwards.

At December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the REIT had NOL carryforwards of $625.8 million, $1.1 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively. Additionally, the REIT has $14.4 million of federal income tax credits that were carried over from acquisitions. These amounts can be used to offset future taxable income (and/or taxable income for prior years if an audit determines that tax is owed), if any. The REIT will be entitled to utilize NOLs and tax credit carryforwards only to the extent that REIT taxable income exceeds our deduction for dividends paid. Certain NOL and credit carryforwards are limited as to their utilization by Section 382 of the Code. The remaining REIT carryforwards begin to expire in 2024.

For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the net difference between tax bases and the reported amount of REIT assets and liabilities for federal income tax purposes was approximately $4.1 billion and $4.4 billion, respectively, less than the book bases of those assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes.

Generally, we are subject to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for the year ended December 31, 2014 and subsequent years and are subject to audit by state taxing authorities for the year ended December 31, 2013 and subsequent years. We are subject to audit generally under the statutes of limitation by the Canada Revenue Agency and provincial authorities with respect to the Canadian entities for the year ended December 31, 2013 and subsequent years. We are also subject to audit in Canada for periods subsequent to the acquisition, and certain prior periods, with respect to entities acquired in 2014 from Holiday Retirement. We are subject to audit in the United Kingdom generally for the periods ended in and subsequent to 2016.

The following table summarizes the activity related to our unrecognized tax benefits:
 
2017
 
2016
 
(In thousands)
Balance as of January 1
$
20,950

 
$
24,135

Additions to tax positions related to prior years
648

 
222

Subtractions to tax positions related to prior years
(497
)
 

Subtractions to tax positions as a result of the lapse of the statute of limitations
(4,336
)
 
(3,407
)
Balance as of December 31
$
16,765

 
$
20,950



121

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Included in these unrecognized tax benefits of $16.8 million and $21.0 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, were $15.0 million and $19.3 million of tax benefits at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, that, if recognized, would reduce our annual effective tax rate. We accrued interest of $0.2 million related to the unrecognized tax benefits during 2017, but no penalties. We expect our unrecognized tax benefits to decrease by $2.6 million during 2018, as a result of the lapse of the statute of limitations.

As a part of the transfer pricing structure in the normal course of business, the REIT enters into transactions with certain TRSs, such as leasing transactions, other capital financing and allocation of general and administrative costs, which transactions are intended to comply with Internal Revenue Service and foreign tax authority transfer pricing rules.


NOTE 14—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Proceedings against Tenants, Operators and Managers

From time to time, Atria, Sunrise, Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent, Kindred and our other tenants, operators and managers are parties to certain legal actions, regulatory investigations and claims arising in the conduct of their business and operations. Even though we generally are not party to these proceedings, the unfavorable resolution of any such actions, investigations or claims could, individually or in the aggregate, materially adversely affect such tenants’, operators’ or managers’ liquidity, financial condition or results of operations and their ability to satisfy their respective obligations to us, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Proceedings Indemnified and Defended by Third Parties

From time to time, we are party to certain legal actions, regulatory investigations and claims for which third parties are contractually obligated to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless. The tenants of our triple-net leased properties and, in some cases, their affiliates are required by the terms of their leases and other agreements with us to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless against certain actions, investigations and claims arising in the course of their business and related to the operations of our triple-net leased properties. In addition, third parties from whom we acquired certain of our assets and, in some cases, their affiliates are required by the terms of the related conveyance documents to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless against certain actions, investigations and claims related to the acquired assets and arising prior to our ownership or related to excluded assets and liabilities. In some cases, a portion of the purchase price consideration is held in escrow for a specified period of time as collateral for these indemnification obligations. We are presently being defended by certain tenants and other obligated third parties in these types of matters. We cannot assure you that our tenants, their affiliates or other obligated third parties will continue to defend us in these matters, that our tenants, their affiliates or other obligated third parties will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable them to satisfy their defense and indemnification obligations to us or that any purchase price consideration held in escrow will be sufficient to satisfy claims for which we are entitled to indemnification. The unfavorable resolution of any such actions, investigations or claims could, individually or in the aggregate, materially adversely affect our tenants’ or other obligated third parties’ liquidity, financial condition or results of operations and their ability to satisfy their respective obligations to us, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Proceedings Arising in Connection with Senior Living and Office Operations; Other Litigation

From time to time, we are party to various legal actions, regulatory investigations and claims (some of which may not be insured and some of which may allege large damage amounts) arising in connection with our senior living and office operations or otherwise in the course of our business. In limited circumstances, the manager of the applicable seniors housing community, MOB or life science and innovation center may be contractually obligated to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless against such actions, investigations and claims. It is the opinion of management that, except as otherwise set forth in this Note 14, that the disposition of any such actions, investigations and claims that are currently pending will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on us. However, regardless of their merits, we may be forced to expend significant financial resources to defend and resolve these matters. We are unable to predict the ultimate outcome of these actions, investigations and claims, and if management’s assessment of our liability with respect thereto is incorrect, such actions, investigations and claims could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Certain Obligations, Liabilities and Litigation

We may be subject to various obligations, liabilities and litigation assumed in connection with or arising out of our acquisitions or otherwise arising in connection with our business, some of which may be indemnifiable by third parties. If these liabilities are greater than expected or were not known to us at the time of acquisition, if we are not entitled to indemnification,

122

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


or if the responsible third party fails to indemnify us, such obligations, liabilities and litigation could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. In addition, in connection with the sale or leasing of our properties, we may incur various obligations and liabilities, including indemnification obligations to the buyer or tenant, relating to the operations of those properties, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Other

With respect to certain of our properties, we are subject to operating and ground lease obligations that generally require fixed monthly or annual rent payments and may include escalation clauses and renewal options. These leases have terms that expire during the next 84 years, excluding extension options.

As of December 31, 2017, our future minimum lease obligations under non-cancelable operating and ground leases were as follows:
 
Lease Payments
 
(In thousands)
2018
$
27,498

2019
23,953

2020
23,206

2021
22,651

2022
17,738

Thereafter
623,462

Total
$
738,508


NOTE 15—EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table shows the amounts used in computing our basic and diluted earnings per common share:
 
For the Year Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations
$
643,949

 
$
554,209

 
$
389,539

Discontinued operations
(110
)
 
(922
)
 
11,103

Gain on real estate dispositions
717,273

 
98,203

 
18,580

Net income
1,361,112

 
651,490

 
419,222

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
4,642

 
2,259

 
1,379

Net income attributable to common stockholders          
$
1,356,470

 
$
649,231

 
$
417,843

Denominator:
 
 
 
 
 
Denominator for basic earnings per share—weighted average shares
355,326

 
344,703

 
330,311

Effect of dilutive securities:
 
 
 
 
 
Stock options
494

 
569

 
360

Restricted stock awards
265

 
176

 
41

OP Unitholder interests
2,481

 
2,942

 
3,295

Denominator for diluted earnings per share—adjusted weighted average shares
358,566

 
348,390

 
334,007

Basic earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations
$
1.81

 
$
1.61

 
$
1.18

Net income attributable to common stockholders          
3.82

 
1.88

 
1.26

Diluted earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations
$
1.80

 
$
1.59

 
$
1.17

Net income attributable to common stockholders          
3.78

 
1.86
 
1.25


123

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



There were 3.0 million, 1.4 million and 0.9 million anti-dilutive options outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.


NOTE 16—PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EQUITY

Capital Stock

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we issued and sold 1.1 million shares of common stock under our “at-the-market” (“ATM”) equity offering program for aggregate net proceeds of $73.9 million, after sales agent commissions. As of December 31, 2017, approximately $155.6 million of our common stock remained available for sale under our ATM equity offering program.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, we issued and sold a total of 18.9 million shares of our common stock under our ATM equity offering program and public offerings. Aggregate net proceeds for these activities were $1.3 billion, after sales agent commissions. We used the proceeds to fund a portion of the Life Sciences Acquisition, for working capital and other general corporate purposes. See “NOTE 4—ACQUISITIONS OF REAL ESTATE PROPERTY” for additional information.

In January 2015, in connection with the HCT acquisition, we issued approximately 28.4 million shares of our common stock and 1.1 million Class C Units that were redeemable for our common stock.
    
For the year ended December 31, 2015, we issued and sold a total of 7.2 million shares of common stock under our ATM equity offering program for aggregate net proceeds of $491.6 million, after sales agent commissions.

Excess Share Provision

In order to preserve our ability to maintain REIT status, our Charter provides that if a person acquires beneficial ownership of more than 9% of our outstanding common stock or 9.9% of our outstanding preferred stock, the shares that are beneficially owned in excess of such limit are deemed to be excess shares. These shares are automatically deemed transferred to a trust for the benefit of a charitable institution or other qualifying organization selected by our Board of Directors. The trust is entitled to all dividends with respect to the shares and the trustee may exercise all voting power over the shares.

We have the right to buy the excess shares for a purchase price equal to the lesser of the price per share in the transaction that created the excess shares or the market price on the date we buy the shares, and we may defer payment of the purchase price for the excess shares for up to five years. If we do not purchase the excess shares, the trustee of the trust is required to transfer the excess shares at the direction of the Board of Directors. The owner of the excess shares is entitled to receive the lesser of the proceeds from the sale or the original purchase price for such excess shares, and any additional amounts are payable to the beneficiary of the trust. As of December 31, 2017, there were no shares in the trust.

Our Board of Directors is empowered to grant waivers from the excess share provisions of our Charter.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The following is a summary of our accumulated other comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:
 
2017
 
2016
 
(In thousands)
Foreign currency translation
$
(45,580
)
 
$
(66,192
)
Accumulated unrealized gain on government-sponsored pooled loan investments
802

 
1,239

Other
9,658

 
7,419

Total accumulated other comprehensive loss
$
(35,120
)
 
$
(57,534
)

The change in foreign currency translation during the year ended December 31, 2017 was due primarily to the remeasurement of our properties located in the United Kingdom.


124

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Redeemable OP Unitholder and Noncontrolling Interests

The following is a rollforward of our redeemable OP Unitholder Interests and noncontrolling interests for 2017:
 
 
Redeemable OP Unitholder Interests
 
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
 
Total Redeemable OP Unitholder and Noncontrolling Interests
 
 
(In thousands)
Balance as of December 31, 2016
 
$
177,177

 
$
23,551

 
$
200,728

New issuances
 

 
2,143

 
2,143

Change in valuation
 
(2,112
)
 
2,353

 
241

Distributions and other
 
(5,677
)
 

 
(5,677
)
Redemptions
 
(23,136
)
 
(15,809
)
 
(38,945
)
Balance as of December 31, 2017
 
$
146,252

 
$
12,238

 
$
158,490

    
During 2017, third party investors redeemed 53,728 OP Units and 341,776 Class C Units for 390,403 shares of Ventas common stock, valued at $24.0 million.


NOTE 17—RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

As disclosed in “NOTE 3—CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK,” Atria provides comprehensive property management and accounting services with respect to our seniors housing communities that Atria operates, for which we pay annual management fees pursuant to long-term management agreements.  Most of our management agreements with Atria have initial terms expiring either July 31, 2024 or December 31, 2027, with successive automatic ten-year renewal periods. The management fees payable to Atria under most of the Atria management agreements range from 4.5% to 5% of revenues generated by the applicable properties, and Atria can earn up to an additional 1% of revenues based on the achievement of specified performance targets. Atria also provides certain construction and development management services relating to various development and redevelopment projects within our seniors housing portfolio. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we incurred fees to Atria of $59.7 million, $58.7 million, and $58.0 million respectively, the majority of which are recorded within property-level operating expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

As disclosed in “NOTE 4—ACQUISITIONS OF REAL ESTATE PROPERTY,” we leased 10 hospital campuses to Ardent pursuant to a single, triple-net master lease agreement. Pursuant to our master lease agreement, Ardent is obligated to pay base rent, which escalates annually by the lesser of four times the increase in the consumer price index for the relevant period and 2.5%.  The initial term of the master lease expires on August 31, 2035 and Ardent has one ten-year renewal option. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the period from the closing of the Ardent Transaction through December 31, 2015, we recognized rental income from Ardent of $110.8 million, $106.9 million, and $42.9 million, respectively. In 2015, as part of the closing, we also paid certain transaction-related fees to Ardent of $40.0 million, which are recorded within merger-related expenses and deal costs in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

These transactions are considered to be arm’s length in nature and on terms consistent with transactions with unaffiliated third parties.


125

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


NOTE 18—QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

Summarized unaudited consolidated quarterly information for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 is provided below.
 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues
$
883,443

 
$
895,490

 
$
899,928

 
$
895,288

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations
$
155,912

 
$
152,272

 
$
156,930

 
$
178,835

Discontinued operations
(53
)
 
(23
)
 
(19
)
 
(15
)
Gain on real estate dispositions
43,289

 
719

 
458,280

 
214,985

Net income
199,148

 
152,968

 
615,191

 
393,805

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
1,021

 
1,137

 
1,233

 
1,251

Net income attributable to common stockholders          
$
198,127

 
$
151,831

 
$
613,958

 
$
392,554

Earnings per share:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Basic:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Income from continuing operations
$
0.44

 
$
0.43

 
$
0.44

 
$
0.50

Net income attributable to common stockholders
0.56

 
0.43

 
1.72

 
1.10

Diluted:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Income from continuing operations
$
0.44

 
$
0.42

 
$
0.44

 
$
0.50

Net income attributable to common stockholders
0.55

 
0.42

 
1.71

 
1.09

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends declared per share
$
0.775

 
$
0.775

 
$
0.775

 
$
0.79

 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues
$
852,289

 
$
848,404

 
$
867,116

 
$
875,713

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations
$
123,339

 
$
137,849

 
$
150,446

 
$
142,575

Discontinued operations
(489
)
 
(148
)
 
(118
)
 
(167
)
Gain (loss) on real estate dispositions
26,184

 
5,739

 
(144
)
 
66,424

Net income
149,034

 
143,440

 
150,184

 
208,832

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
54

 
278

 
732

 
1,195

  Net income attributable to common stockholders          
$
148,980

 
$
143,162

 
$
149,452

 
$
207,637

Earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations
$
0.37

 
$
0.41

 
$
0.43

 
$
0.40

Net income attributable to common stockholders
0.44

 
0.42

 
0.43

 
0.59

Diluted:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations
$
0.36

 
$
0.40

 
$
0.42

 
$
0.40

Net income attributable to common stockholders
0.44

 
0.42

 
0.42

 
0.58

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends declared per share
$
0.73

 
$
0.73

 
$
0.73

 
$
0.775

    

126

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION
As of December 31, 2017, we operated through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and office operations. Under our triple-net leased properties segment, we invest in and own seniors housing and healthcare properties throughout the United States and the United Kingdom and lease those properties to healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses. In our senior living operations segment, we invest in seniors housing communities throughout the United States and Canada and engage independent operators, such as Atria and Sunrise, to manage those communities. In our office operations segment, we primarily acquire, own, develop, lease and manage MOBs and life science and innovation centers throughout the United States. Information provided for “all other” includes income from loans and investments and other miscellaneous income and various corporate-level expenses not directly attributable to any of our three reportable business segments. Assets included in “all other” consist primarily of corporate assets, including cash, restricted cash, loans receivable and investments, and miscellaneous accounts receivable.
Our chief operating decision makers evaluate performance of the combined properties in each reportable business segment and determine how to allocate resources to those segments, in significant part, based on segment NOI and related measures. We define segment NOI as total revenues, less interest and other income, property-level operating expenses and office building services costs. We consider segment NOI useful because it allows investors, analysts and our management to measure unlevered property-level operating results and to compare our operating results to the operating results of other real estate companies between periods on a consistent basis. In order to facilitate a clear understanding of our historical consolidated operating results, segment NOI should be examined in conjunction with income from continuing operations as presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements and other financial data included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Interest expense, depreciation and amortization, general, administrative and professional fees, income tax expense and other non-property specific revenues and expenses are not allocated to individual reportable business segments for purposes of assessing segment performance. There are no intersegment sales or transfers.

127

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Summary information by reportable business segment is as follows:
 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
 
Triple-Net
Leased
Properties
 
Senior
Living
Operations
 
Office
Operations
 
All
Other
 
Total
 
(In thousands)
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
840,131

 
$

 
$
753,467

 
$

 
$
1,593,598

Resident fees and services

 
1,843,232

 

 

 
1,843,232

Office building and other services revenue
4,580

 

 
7,497

 
1,600

 
13,677

Income from loans and investments

 

 

 
117,608

 
117,608

Interest and other income

 

 

 
6,034

 
6,034

Total revenues
$
844,711

 
$
1,843,232

 
$
760,964

 
$
125,242

 
$
3,574,149

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenues
$
844,711

 
$
1,843,232

 
$
760,964

 
$
125,242

 
$
3,574,149

Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest and other income

 

 

 
6,034

 
6,034

Property-level operating expenses

 
1,250,065

 
233,007

 

 
1,483,072

Office building services costs

 

 
3,391

 

 
3,391

Segment NOI
844,711

 
593,167

 
524,566

 
119,208

 
2,081,652

Income (loss) from unconsolidated entities
845

 
(61
)
 
503

 
(1,848
)
 
(561
)
Segment profit
$
845,556

 
$
593,106

 
$
525,069

 
$
117,360

 
2,081,091

Interest and other income
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
6,034

Interest expense
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(448,196
)
Depreciation and amortization
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(887,948
)
General, administrative and professional fees
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(135,490
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(754
)
Merger-related expenses and deal costs
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(10,535
)
Other
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(20,052
)
Income tax benefit
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
59,799

Income from continuing operations
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
$
643,949


128

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
 
Triple-Net
Leased
Properties
 
Senior
Living
Operations
 
Office
Operations
 
All
Other
 
Total
 
(In thousands)
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
845,834

 
$

 
$
630,342

 
$

 
$
1,476,176

Resident fees and services

 
1,847,306

 

 

 
1,847,306

Office building and other services revenue
4,921

 

 
13,029

 
3,120

 
21,070

Income from loans and investments

 

 

 
98,094

 
98,094

Interest and other income

 

 

 
876

 
876

Total revenues
$
850,755

 
$
1,847,306

 
$
643,371

 
$
102,090

 
$
3,443,522

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenues
$
850,755

 
$
1,847,306

 
$
643,371

 
$
102,090

 
$
3,443,522

Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest and other income

 

 

 
876

 
876

Property-level operating expenses

 
1,242,978

 
191,784

 

 
1,434,762

Office building services costs

 

 
7,311

 

 
7,311

Segment NOI
850,755

 
604,328

 
444,276

 
101,214

 
2,000,573

Income from unconsolidated entities
2,363

 
1,265

 
590

 
140

 
4,358

Segment profit
$
853,118

 
$
605,593

 
$
444,866

 
$
101,354

 
2,004,931

Interest and other income
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
876

Interest expense
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(419,740
)
Depreciation and amortization
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(898,924
)
General, administrative and professional fees
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(126,875
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(2,779
)
Merger-related expenses and deal costs
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(24,635
)
Other
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(9,988
)
Income tax benefit
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
31,343

Income from continuing operations
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
$
554,209


129

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
 
Triple-Net
Leased
Properties
 
Senior
Living
Operations
 
Office
Operations
 
All
Other
 
Total
 
(In thousands)
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
779,801

 
$

 
$
566,245

 
$

 
$
1,346,046

Resident fees and services

 
1,811,255

 

 

 
1,811,255

Office building and other services revenue
4,433

 

 
34,436

 
2,623

 
41,492

Income from loans and investments

 

 

 
86,553

 
86,553

Interest and other income

 

 

 
1,052

 
1,052

Total revenues
$
784,234

 
$
1,811,255

 
$
600,681

 
$
90,228

 
$
3,286,398

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenues
$
784,234

 
$
1,811,255

 
$
600,681

 
$
90,228

 
$
3,286,398

Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest and other income

 

 

 
1,052

 
1,052

Property-level operating expenses

 
1,209,415

 
174,225

 

 
1,383,640

Office building services costs

 

 
26,565

 

 
26,565

Segment NOI
784,234

 
601,840

 
399,891

 
89,176

 
1,875,141

(Loss) income from unconsolidated entities
(813
)
 
(526
)
 
369

 
(450
)
 
(1,420
)
Segment profit
$
783,421

 
$
601,314

 
$
400,260

 
$
88,726

 
1,873,721

Interest and other income
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
1,052

Interest expense
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(367,114
)
Depreciation and amortization
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(894,057
)
General, administrative and professional fees
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(128,035
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(14,411
)
Merger-related expenses and deal costs
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(102,944
)
Other
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(17,957
)
Income tax benefit
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
39,284

Income from continuing operations
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
$
389,539

Assets by reportable business segment are as follows:
 
As of December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Triple-net leased properties
$
7,778,064

 
32.4
%
 
$
7,627,792

 
32.9
%
Senior living operations
7,654,609

 
32.0

 
7,826,262

 
33.8

Office operations
6,897,696

 
28.8

 
6,614,454

 
28.6

All other assets
1,624,172

 
6.8

 
1,098,092

 
4.7

Total assets
$
23,954,541

 
100.0
%
 
$
23,166,600

 
100.0
%

130

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Capital expenditures, including investments in real estate property and development project expenditures, by reportable business segment are as follows:
 
For the Year Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
(In thousands)
Capital expenditures:
 
 
 
 
 
Triple-net leased properties
$
169,661

 
$
74,192

 
$
1,890,245

Senior living operations
149,449

 
105,614

 
382,877

Office operations
492,765

 
1,503,304

 
604,827

Total capital expenditures
$
811,875

 
$
1,683,110

 
$
2,877,949

Our portfolio of properties and mortgage loan and other investments are located in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. Revenues are attributed to an individual country based on the location of each property. Geographic information regarding our operations is as follows:
 
For the Year Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
(In thousands)
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
United States
$
3,361,682

 
$
3,242,353

 
$
3,086,449

Canada
186,049

 
174,831

 
173,778

United Kingdom
26,418

 
26,338

 
26,171

Total revenues
$
3,574,149

 
$
3,443,522

 
$
3,286,398

 
As of December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
(In thousands)
Net real estate property:
 
 
 
United States
$
19,219,650

 
$
19,105,939

Canada
1,070,903

 
1,037,105

United Kingdom
297,827

 
251,710

Total net real estate property
$
20,588,380

 
$
20,394,754



NOTE 20—CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING INFORMATION
Ventas, Inc. has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to the outstanding senior notes issued by our 100% owned subsidiary, Ventas Realty, including the senior notes that were jointly issued with Ventas Capital Corporation. Ventas Capital Corporation is a direct 100% owned subsidiary of Ventas Realty that has no assets or operations, but was formed in 2002 solely to facilitate offerings of senior notes by a limited partnership. None of our other subsidiaries (such subsidiaries, excluding Ventas Realty and Ventas Capital Corporation, the “Ventas Subsidiaries”) is obligated with respect to Ventas Realty’s outstanding senior notes. Certain of Ventas Realty’s outstanding senior notes reflected in our condensed consolidating information were issued jointly with Ventas Capital Corporation.
Ventas, Inc. has also fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to the outstanding senior notes issued by our 100% owned subsidiary, Ventas Canada Finance Limited. None of our other subsidiaries is obligated with respect to Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s outstanding senior notes, all of which were issued on a private placement basis in Canada.
In connection with the NHP acquisition, our 100% owned subsidiary, NHP LLC, as successor to NHP, assumed the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to the outstanding senior notes issued by NHP. Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries (other than NHP LLC) is obligated with respect to any of NHP LLC’s outstanding senior notes.
Under certain circumstances, contractual and legal restrictions, including those contained in the instruments governing our subsidiaries’ outstanding mortgage indebtedness, may restrict our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries for the

131

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


purpose of meeting our debt service obligations, including our payment guarantees with respect to Ventas Realty’s and Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s senior notes.
The following summarizes our condensed consolidating information as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 and for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015:

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
 
As of December 31, 2017
 
Ventas, Inc.
 
Ventas Realty
 
Ventas Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated
Elimination
 
Consolidated
 
(In thousands)
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net real estate investments
$
1,844

 
$
119,508

 
$
21,937,026

 
$

 
$
22,058,378

Cash and cash equivalents
9,828

 

 
71,527

 

 
81,355

Escrow deposits and restricted cash
39,816

 
128

 
66,954

 

 
106,898

Investment in and advances to affiliates
14,786,086

 
2,916,060

 

 
(17,702,146
)
 

Goodwill

 

 
1,034,641

 

 
1,034,641

Assets held for sale

 

 
100,324

 

 
100,324

Other assets
55,936

 
9,458

 
507,551

 

 
572,945

Total assets
$
14,893,510

 
$
3,045,154

 
$
23,718,023

 
$
(17,702,146
)
 
$
23,954,541

Liabilities and equity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior notes payable and other debt
$

 
$
8,895,641

 
$
2,380,421

 
$

 
$
11,276,062

Intercompany loans
7,835,266

 
(7,127,624
)
 
(707,642
)
 

 

Accrued interest
(6,410
)
 
77,691

 
22,677

 

 
93,958

Accounts payable and other liabilities
381,512

 
24,635

 
776,405

 

 
1,182,552

Liabilities related to assets held for sale

 

 
61,202

 

 
61,202

Deferred income taxes
250,092

 

 

 

 
250,092

Total liabilities
8,460,460

 
1,870,343

 
2,533,063

 

 
12,863,866

Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests

 

 
158,490

 

 
158,490

Total equity
6,433,050

 
1,174,811

 
21,026,470

 
(17,702,146
)
 
10,932,185

Total liabilities and equity
$
14,893,510

 
$
3,045,154

 
$
23,718,023

 
$
(17,702,146
)
 
$
23,954,541




132

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
 
As of December 31, 2016
 
Ventas, Inc.
 
Ventas
Realty
 
Ventas Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated
Elimination
 
Consolidated
 
(In thousands)
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net real estate investments
$
2,007

 
$
173,259

 
$
21,017,430

 
$

 
$
21,192,696

Cash and cash equivalents
210,303

 

 
76,404

 

 
286,707

Escrow deposits and restricted cash
198

 
1,504

 
78,945

 

 
80,647

Investment in and advances to affiliates
14,166,255

 
2,938,442

 

 
(17,104,697
)
 

Goodwill

 

 
1,033,225

 

 
1,033,225

Assets held for sale

 

 
54,961

 

 
54,961

Other assets
35,468

 
6,791

 
476,105

 

 
518,364

Total assets
$
14,414,231

 
$
3,119,996

 
$
22,737,070

 
$
(17,104,697
)
 
$
23,166,600

Liabilities and equity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior notes payable and other debt
$

 
$
8,406,979

 
$
2,720,347

 
$

 
$
11,127,326

Intercompany loans
6,996,162

 
(6,209,706
)
 
(786,456
)
 

 

Accrued interest
(1,753
)
 
67,156

 
18,359

 

 
83,762

Accounts payable and other liabilities
89,115

 
35,587

 
783,226

 

 
907,928

Liabilities related to assets held for sale

 
(1
)
 
1,463

 

 
1,462

Deferred income taxes
316,641

 

 

 

 
316,641

Total liabilities
7,400,165

 
2,300,015

 
2,736,939

 

 
12,437,119

Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests

 

 
200,728

 

 
200,728

Total equity
7,014,066

 
819,981

 
19,799,403

 
(17,104,697
)
 
10,528,753

Total liabilities and equity
$
14,414,231

 
$
3,119,996

 
$
22,737,070

 
$
(17,104,697
)
 
$
23,166,600













133

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
 
Ventas, Inc.
 
Ventas Realty
 
Ventas Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated
Elimination
 
Consolidated
 
(In thousands)
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
2,383

 
$
178,165

 
$
1,413,050

 
$

 
$
1,593,598

Resident fees and services

 

 
1,843,232

 

 
1,843,232

Office building and other services revenues

 

 
13,677

 

 
13,677

Income from loans and investments
1,236

 

 
116,372

 

 
117,608

Equity earnings in affiliates
488,862

 

 
(1,620
)
 
(487,242
)
 

Interest and other income
5,388

 

 
646

 

 
6,034

Total revenues
497,869

 
178,165

 
3,385,357

 
(487,242
)
 
3,574,149

Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest
(101,222
)
 
319,630

 
229,788

 

 
448,196

Depreciation and amortization
5,483

 
7,510

 
874,955

 

 
887,948

Property-level operating expenses

 
329

 
1,482,743

 

 
1,483,072

Office building services costs

 

 
3,391

 

 
3,391

General, administrative and professional fees
2,056

 
16,976

 
116,458

 

 
135,490

Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt, net

 
943

 
(189
)
 

 
754

Merger-related expenses and deal costs
9,797

 

 
738

 

 
10,535

Other
2,247

 
1

 
17,804

 

 
20,052

Total expenses
(81,639
)
 
345,389

 
2,725,688

 

 
2,989,438

Income (loss) before unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations, real estate dispositions and noncontrolling interests
579,508

 
(167,224
)
 
659,669

 
(487,242
)
 
584,711

Income (loss) from unconsolidated entities

 
5,306

 
(5,867
)
 

 
(561
)
Income tax benefit
59,799

 

 

 

 
59,799

Income (loss) from continuing operations
639,307

 
(161,918
)
 
653,802

 
(487,242
)
 
643,949

Discontinued operations
(110
)
 

 

 

 
(110
)
Gain on real estate dispositions
717,273

 

 

 

 
717,273

Net income (loss)
1,356,470

 
(161,918
)
 
653,802

 
(487,242
)
 
1,361,112

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 

 
4,642

 

 
4,642

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
$
1,356,470

 
$
(161,918
)
 
$
649,160

 
$
(487,242
)
 
$
1,356,470




134

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
 
Ventas, Inc.
 
Ventas Realty
 
Ventas Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated
Elimination
 
Consolidated
 
(In thousands)
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
2,670

 
$
196,991

 
$
1,276,515

 
$

 
$
1,476,176

Resident fees and services

 

 
1,847,306

 

 
1,847,306

Office building and other services revenues
1,605

 

 
19,465

 

 
21,070

Income from loans and investments
341

 

 
97,753

 

 
98,094

Equity earnings in affiliates
500,515

 

 
(1,223
)
 
(499,292
)
 

Interest and other income
666

 

 
210

 

 
876

Total revenues
505,797

 
196,991

 
3,240,026

 
(499,292
)
 
3,443,522

Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest
(46,650
)
 
281,458

 
184,932

 

 
419,740

Depreciation and amortization
8,968

 
18,297

 
871,659

 

 
898,924

Property-level operating expenses

 
317

 
1,434,445

 

 
1,434,762

Office building services costs

 

 
7,311

 

 
7,311

General, administrative and professional fees
509

 
18,320

 
108,046

 

 
126,875

Loss on extinguishment of debt, net

 
2,770

 
9

 

 
2,779

Merger-related expenses and deal costs
23,068

 

 
1,567

 

 
24,635

Other
(705
)
 
41

 
10,652

 

 
9,988

Total expenses
(14,810
)
 
321,203

 
2,618,621

 

 
2,925,014

Income (loss) before unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations and noncontrolling interests
520,607

 
(124,212
)
 
621,405

 
(499,292
)
 
518,508

Income from unconsolidated entities

 
1,840

 
2,518

 

 
4,358

Income tax benefit
31,343

 

 

 

 
31,343

Income (loss) from continuing operations
551,950

 
(122,372
)
 
623,923

 
(499,292
)
 
554,209

Discontinued operations
(922
)
 

 

 

 
(922
)
Gain on real estate dispositions
98,203

 

 

 

 
98,203

Net income (loss)
649,231

 
(122,372
)
 
623,923

 
(499,292
)
 
651,490

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 

 
2,259

 

 
2,259

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
$
649,231

 
$
(122,372
)
 
$
621,664

 
$
(499,292
)
 
$
649,231




135

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
 
Ventas, Inc.
 
Ventas Realty
 
Ventas Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated
Elimination
 
Consolidated
 
(In thousands)
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
3,663

 
$
198,017

 
$
1,144,366

 
$

 
$
1,346,046

Resident fees and services

 

 
1,811,255

 

 
1,811,255

Office building and other services revenues
895

 

 
40,597

 

 
41,492

Income from loans and investments
8,605

 
534

 
77,414

 

 
86,553

Equity earnings in affiliates
458,213

 

 
(649
)
 
(457,564
)
 

Interest and other income
495

 
(6
)
 
563

 

 
1,052

Total revenues
471,871

 
198,545

 
3,073,546

 
(457,564
)
 
3,286,398

Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest
(38,393
)
 
257,503

 
148,004

 

 
367,114

Depreciation and amortization
5,443

 
14,679

 
873,935

 

 
894,057

Property-level operating expenses

 
367

 
1,383,273

 

 
1,383,640

Office building services costs

 

 
26,565

 

 
26,565

General, administrative and professional fees
(321
)
 
20,777

 
107,579

 

 
128,035

Loss on extinguishment of debt, net

 
4,523

 
9,888

 

 
14,411

Merger-related expenses and deal costs
98,644

 
75

 
4,225

 

 
102,944

Other
(358
)
 
45

 
18,270

 

 
17,957

Total expenses
65,015

 
297,969

 
2,571,739

 

 
2,934,723

Income (loss) before unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations, and noncontrolling interests
406,856

 
(99,424
)
 
501,807

 
(457,564
)
 
351,675

Loss from unconsolidated entities

 
(183
)
 
(1,237
)
 

 
(1,420
)
Income tax benefit
39,284

 

 

 

 
39,284

Income (loss) from continuing operations
446,140

 
(99,607
)
 
500,570

 
(457,564
)
 
389,539

Discontinued operations
(46,877
)

34,748


23,232

 

 
11,103

Gain on real estate dispositions
18,580

 

 

 

 
18,580

Net income (loss)
417,843

 
(64,859
)
 
523,802

 
(457,564
)
 
419,222

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 

 
1,379

 

 
1,379

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
$
417,843

 
$
(64,859
)
 
$
522,423

 
$
(457,564
)
 
$
417,843




136

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
 
Ventas, Inc.
 
Ventas Realty
 
Ventas Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated
Elimination
 
Consolidated
 
(In thousands)
Net income (loss)
$
1,356,470

 
$
(161,918
)
 
$
653,802

 
$
(487,242
)
 
$
1,361,112

Other comprehensive (loss) income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation

 

 
20,612

 

 
20,612

Unrealized loss on government-sponsored pooled loan investments
(437
)
 

 

 

 
(437
)
Other

 

 
2,239

 

 
2,239

Total other comprehensive (loss) income
(437
)
 

 
22,851

 

 
22,414

Comprehensive income (loss)
1,356,033

 
(161,918
)
 
676,653

 
(487,242
)
 
1,383,526

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 

 
4,642

 

 
4,642

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
$
1,356,033

 
$
(161,918
)
 
$
672,011

 
$
(487,242
)
 
$
1,378,884

 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
 
Ventas, Inc.
 
Ventas Realty
 
Ventas Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated
Elimination
 
Consolidated
 
(In thousands)
Net income (loss)
$
649,231

 
$
(122,372
)
 
$
623,923

 
$
(499,292
)
 
$
651,490

Other comprehensive loss:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation

 

 
(52,266
)
 

 
(52,266
)
Unrealized loss on government-sponsored pooled loan investments
(310
)
 

 

 

 
(310
)
Other

 

 
2,607

 

 
2,607

Total other comprehensive loss
(310
)
 

 
(49,659
)
 

 
(49,969
)
Comprehensive income (loss)
648,921

 
(122,372
)
 
574,264

 
(499,292
)
 
601,521

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 

 
2,259

 

 
2,259

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
$
648,921

 
$
(122,372
)
 
$
572,005

 
$
(499,292
)
 
$
599,262

 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
 
Ventas, Inc.
 
Ventas Realty
 
Ventas Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated
Elimination
 
Consolidated
 
(In thousands)
Net income (loss)
$
417,843

 
$
(64,859
)
 
$
523,802

 
$
(457,564
)
 
$
419,222

Other comprehensive loss:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation

 

 
(14,792
)
 

 
(14,792
)
Unrealized loss on government-sponsored pooled loan investments
(5,236
)
 

 

 

 
(5,236
)
Other

 

 
(658
)
 

 
(658
)
Total other comprehensive loss
(5,236
)
 

 
(15,450
)
 

 
(20,686
)
Comprehensive income (loss)
412,607

 
(64,859
)
 
508,352

 
(457,564
)
 
398,536

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 

 
1,379

 

 
1,379

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
$
412,607

 
$
(64,859
)
 
$
506,973

 
$
(457,564
)
 
$
397,157





137

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
 
Ventas, Inc.
 
Ventas Realty
 
Ventas Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated
Elimination
 
Consolidated
 
(In thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
$
150,548

 
$
(142,584
)
 
$
1,434,216

 
$

 
$
1,442,180

Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net investment in real estate property
(350,900
)
 

 
(29,332
)
 

 
(380,232
)
Investment in loans receivable and other
(4,633
)
 

 
(743,486
)
 

 
(748,119
)
Proceeds from real estate disposals
537,144

 

 
287

 

 
537,431

Proceeds from loans receivable
47

 

 
101,050

 

 
101,097

Development project expenditures

 

 
(299,085
)
 

 
(299,085
)
Capital expenditures

 
(726
)
 
(131,832
)
 

 
(132,558
)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities

 

 
6,169

 

 
6,169

Investment in unconsolidated entities

 

 
(61,220
)
 

 
(61,220
)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
181,658

 
(726
)
 
(1,157,449
)
 

 
(976,517
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net change in borrowings under revolving credit facilities

 
478,868

 
(94,085
)
 

 
384,783

Proceeds from debt

 
793,904

 
317,745

 

 
1,111,649

Repayment of debt

 
(778,606
)
 
(590,478
)
 

 
(1,369,084
)
Purchase of noncontrolling interests
(15,809
)
 

 

 


 
(15,809
)
Net change in intercompany debt
1,002,694

 
(917,917
)
 
(84,777
)
 

 

Payment of deferred financing costs

 
(20,450
)
 
(6,847
)
 

 
(27,297
)
Issuance of common stock, net
73,596

 

 

 

 
73,596

Cash distribution (to) from affiliates
(804,901
)
 
587,511

 
217,390

 

 

Cash distribution to common stockholders
(827,285
)
 

 

 

 
(827,285
)
Cash distribution to redeemable OP unitholders

 

 
(5,677
)
 

 
(5,677
)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests

 

 
4,402

 

 
4,402

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

 

 
(11,187
)
 

 
(11,187
)
Other
10,582

 

 

 

 
10,582

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(561,123
)
 
143,310

 
(253,514
)
 

 
(671,327
)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(228,917
)
 

 
23,253

 

 
(205,664
)
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents
28,442

 

 
(28,130
)
 

 
312

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
210,303

 

 
76,404

 

 
286,707

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
9,828

 
$

 
$
71,527

 
$

 
$
81,355













138

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
 
Ventas, Inc.
 
Ventas Realty
 
Ventas Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated
Elimination
 
Consolidated
 
(In thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
$
69,496

 
$
(92,923
)
 
$
1,395,768

 
$

 
$
1,372,341

Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Net investment in real estate property
(1,448,230
)
 

 
19,118

 

 
(1,429,112
)
  Investment in loans receivable and other

 

 
(158,635
)
 

 
(158,635
)
  Proceeds from real estate disposals
257,441

 

 
43,120

 

 
300,561

  Proceeds from loans receivable

 

 
320,082

 

 
320,082

  Development project expenditures

 

 
(143,647
)
 

 
(143,647
)
  Capital expenditures

 
(314
)
 
(117,142
)
 

 
(117,456
)
  Investment in unconsolidated entities

 

 
(6,436
)
 

 
(6,436
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(1,190,789
)
 
(314
)
 
(43,540
)
 

 
(1,234,643
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net change in borrowings under unsecured revolving credit facility

 
(171,000
)
 
135,363

 

 
(35,637
)
Proceeds from debt

 
846,521

 
46,697

 

 
893,218

Repayment of debt

 
(651,820
)
 
(370,293
)
 

 
(1,022,113
)
Net change in intercompany debt
990,056

 
82,266

 
(1,072,322
)
 

 

Purchase of noncontrolling interests

 

 
(2,846
)
 

 
(2,846
)
Payment of deferred financing costs

 
(5,787
)
 
(768
)
 

 
(6,555
)
Issuance of common stock, net
1,286,680

 

 

 

 
1,286,680

Cash distribution from (to) affiliates
107,232

 
(6,943
)
 
(100,289
)
 

 

Cash distribution to common stockholders
(1,024,968
)
 

 

 

 
(1,024,968
)
Cash distribution to redeemable OP unitholders

 

 
(8,640
)
 

 
(8,640
)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests

 

 
7,326

 

 
7,326

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

 

 
(6,879
)
 

 
(6,879
)
Other
17,252

 

 

 

 
17,252

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
1,376,252

 
93,237

 
(1,372,651
)
 

 
96,838

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
254,959

 

 
(20,423
)
 

 
234,536

Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents
(56,389
)
 

 
55,537

 

 
(852
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
11,733

 

 
41,290

 

 
53,023

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
210,303

 
$

 
$
76,404

 
$

 
$
286,707


139

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
 
Ventas, Inc.
 
Ventas Realty
 
Ventas Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated
Elimination
 
Consolidated
 
(In thousands)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
$
(115,977
)
 
$
16,528

 
$
1,498,280

 
$

 
$
1,398,831

Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net investment in real estate property
(2,650,788
)
 

 

 

 
(2,650,788
)
Investment in loans receivable and other

 

 
(171,144
)
 

 
(171,144
)
Proceeds from real estate disposals
492,408

 

 

 

 
492,408

Proceeds from loans receivable

 

 
109,176

 

 
109,176

Proceeds from sale or maturity of marketable securities
76,800

 

 

 

 
76,800

Funds held in escrow for future development expenditures

 

 
4,003

 

 
4,003

Development project expenditures

 

 
(119,674
)
 

 
(119,674
)
Capital expenditures

 
(15,733
)
 
(91,754
)
 

 
(107,487
)
Investment in unconsolidated entities
(26,282
)
 

 
(30,704
)
 

 
(56,986
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(2,107,862
)
 
(15,733
)
 
(300,097
)
 

 
(2,423,692
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net change in borrowings under unsecured revolving credit facility

 
(584,000
)
 
(139,457
)
 

 
(723,457
)
Net cash impact of CCP spin-off
1,273,000

 

 
(1,401,749
)
 

 
(128,749
)
Proceeds from debt

 
2,292,568

 
220,179

 

 
2,512,747

Issuance of debt related to CCP spin-off

 

 
1,400,000

 

 
1,400,000

Repayment of debt

 
(705,000
)
 
(730,596
)
 

 
(1,435,596
)
Net change in intercompany debt
1,782,954

 
(1,008,773
)
 
(774,181
)
 

 

Purchase of noncontrolling interests

 

 
(3,819
)
 

 
(3,819
)
Payment of deferred financing costs

 
(22,297
)
 
(2,368
)
 

 
(24,665
)
Issuance of common stock, net
491,023

 

 

 

 
491,023

Cash distribution (to) from affiliates
(315,466
)
 
26,707

 
288,759

 

 

Cash distribution to common stockholders
(1,003,413
)
 

 

 

 
(1,003,413
)
Cash distribution to redeemable OP unitholders



 
(15,095
)
 

 
(15,095
)
Purchases of redeemable OP units

 

 
(33,188
)
 

 
(33,188
)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests

 

 
(12,649
)
 

 
(12,649
)
Other
(81
)
 

 

 

 
(81
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
2,228,017

 
(795
)
 
(1,204,164
)
 

 
1,023,058

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
4,178

 

 
(5,981
)
 

 
(1,803
)
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents
(17,302
)
 

 
16,780

 

 
(522
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
24,857

 

 
30,491

 

 
55,348

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
11,733

 
$

 
$
41,290

 
$

 
$
53,023



140

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


NOTE 21—SUBSEQUENT EVENT

In January 2018, we transitioned the management of 76 private pay seniors housing communities to Eclipse Senior Living (“ESL”). These assets, substantially all of which were previously leased by Elmcroft Senior Living (“Elmcroft”), are now operated by ESL under a management contract with us. We acquired a 34% ownership stake in ESL with customary rights and protections. ESL management owns the remaining 66% stake. We also intend to form a new joint venture with an institutional partner related to the assets previously leased by Elmcroft. However, there can be no assurance whether, when or on what terms the joint venture will be completed.



141


VENTAS, INC.
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

Allowance Accounts
 
 
 
Additions
 
Deductions
 
 
 
 
(In thousands)

Year Ended December 31,
 
Balance at Beginning of Year
 
Charged to Earnings
 
Acquired Properties
 
Uncollectible Accounts Written-off
 
Disposed Properties
 
Balance at End of Year
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts
 
11,636

 
7,207

 

 
(3,237
)
 
(443
)
 
$
15,163

Straight-line rent receivable allowance
 
109,836

 
8,540

 

 

 
(612
)
 
$
117,764

 
 
121,472

 
15,747

 

 
(3,237
)
 
(1,055
)
 
$
132,927

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts
 
13,546

 
5,093

 

 
(7,111
)
 
108

 
$
11,636

Straight-line rent receivable allowance
 
101,418

 
9,682

 

 

 
(1,264
)
 
$
109,836

 
 
114,964

 
14,775

 

 
(7,111
)
 
(1,156
)
 
$
121,472

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts
 
11,460

 
10,937

 
753

 
(12,977
)
 
3,373

 
$
13,546

Straight-line rent receivable allowance
 
83,461

 
35,448

 

 

 
(17,491
)
 
$
101,418

 
 
94,921

 
46,385

 
753

 
(12,977
)
 
(14,118
)
 
$
114,964



142



VENTAS, INC.
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
(In thousands)
Reconciliation of real estate:
 
 
 
 
 
Carrying cost:
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of period
$
23,816,586

 
$
22,458,032

 
$
19,241,735

Additions during period:
 
 
 
 
 
Acquisitions
702,501

 
1,380,044

 
4,063,355

Capital expenditures
452,419

 
270,664

 
229,560

Deductions during period:
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation
93,490

 
(6,252
)
 
(209,460
)
Other(1)
(397,158
)
 
(285,902
)
 
(867,158
)
Balance at end of period
$
24,667,838

 
$
23,816,586

 
$
22,458,032

 
 
 
 
 
 
Accumulated depreciation:
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of period
$
4,190,496

 
$
3,544,625

 
$
2,925,508

Additions during period:
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation expense
760,314

 
732,309

 
778,419

Dispositions:
 
 
 
 
 
Sales and/or transfers to assets held for sale
(176,926
)
 
(87,431
)
 
(144,545
)
Foreign currency translation
11,511

 
993

 
(14,757
)
Balance at end of period
$
4,785,395

 
$
4,190,496

 
$
3,544,625

(1) 
Other may include sales, transfers to assets held for sale and impairments.

143


VENTAS, INC.
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2017
(Dollars in thousands)

 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
IRFS AND LTACS
 
 
 
  

  

  

  

  

 

 
 

 
 
 
Rehabilitation Hospital of Southern Arizona
Tucson
AZ
$

$
770

$
25,589

$

$
770

$
25,589

$
26,359

$
4,920

$
21,439

1992
2011
35 years
Kindred Hospital - Brea
Brea
CA

3,144

2,611


3,144

2,611

5,755

1,467

4,288

1990
1995
40 years
Kindred Hospital - Ontario
Ontario
CA

523

2,988


523

2,988

3,511

3,076

435

1950
1994
25 years
Kindred Hospital - San Diego
San Diego
CA

670

11,764


670

11,764

12,434

11,739

695

1965
1994
25 years
Kindred Hospital - San Francisco Bay Area
San Leandro
CA

2,735

5,870


2,735

5,870

8,605

6,142

2,463

1962
1993
25 years
Tustin Rehabilitation Hospital
Tustin
CA

2,810

25,248


2,810

25,248

28,058

4,948

23,110

1991
2011
35 years
Kindred Hospital - Westminster
Westminster
CA

727

7,384


727

7,384

8,111

7,562

549

1973
1993
20 years
Kindred Hospital - Denver
Denver
CO

896

6,367


896

6,367

7,263

6,711

552

1963
1994
20 years
Kindred Hospital - South Florida - Coral Gables
Coral Gables
FL

1,071

5,348


1,071

5,348

6,419

5,008

1,411

1956
1992
30 years
Kindred Hospital - South Florida Ft. Lauderdale
Fort Lauderdale
FL

1,758

14,080


1,758

14,080

15,838

13,973

1,865

1969
1989
30 years
Kindred Hospital - North Florida
Green Cove Springs
FL

145

4,613


145

4,613

4,758

4,642

116

1956
1994
20 years
Kindred Hospital - South Florida - Hollywood
Hollywood
FL

605

5,229


605

5,229

5,834

5,234

600

1937
1995
20 years
Kindred Hospital - Bay Area St. Petersburg
St. Petersburg
FL

1,401

16,706


1,401

16,706

18,107

14,787

3,320

1968
1997
40 years
Kindred Hospital - Central Tampa
Tampa
FL

2,732

7,676


2,732

7,676

10,408

5,294

5,114

1970
1993
40 years
Kindred Hospital - Chicago (North Campus)
Chicago
IL

1,583

19,980


1,583

19,980

21,563

19,711

1,852

1949
1995
25 years
Kindred - Chicago - Lakeshore
Chicago
IL

1,513

9,525


1,513

9,525

11,038

9,474

1,564

1995
1976
20 years
Kindred Hospital - Chicago (Northlake Campus)
Northlake
IL

850

6,498


850

6,498

7,348

6,198

1,150

1960
1991
30 years
Kindred Hospital - Sycamore
Sycamore
IL

77

8,549


77

8,549

8,626

8,297

329

1949
1993
20 years
Kindred Hospital - Indianapolis
Indianapolis
IN

985

3,801


985

3,801

4,786

3,566

1,220

1955
1993
30 years
Kindred Hospital - Louisville
Louisville
KY

3,041

12,279


3,041

12,279

15,320

12,536

2,784

1964
1995
20 years
Kindred Hospital - St. Louis
St. Louis
MO

1,126

2,087


1,126

2,087

3,213

1,948

1,265

1984
1991
40 years
Kindred Hospital - Las Vegas (Sahara)
Las Vegas
NV

1,110

2,177


1,110

2,177

3,287

1,448

1,839

1980
1994
40 years
Lovelace Rehabilitation Hospital
Albuquerque
NM

401

17,186

1,415

401

18,601

19,002

1,329

17,673

1989
2015
36 years
Kindred Hospital - Albuquerque
Albuquerque
NM

11

4,253


11

4,253

4,264

2,961

1,303

1985
1993
40 years
Kindred Hospital - Greensboro
Greensboro
NC

1,010

7,586


1,010

7,586

8,596

7,686

910

1964
1994
20 years

144


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
University Hospitals Rehabilitation Hospital
Beachwood
OH

1,800

16,444


1,800

16,444

18,244

2,236

16,008

2013
2013
35 years
Kindred Hospital - Philadelphia
Philadelphia
PA

135

5,223


135

5,223

5,358

3,514

1,844

1960
1995
35 years
Kindred Hospital - Chattanooga
Chattanooga
TN

756

4,415


756

4,415

5,171

4,176

995

1975
1993
22 years
Rehabilitation Hospital of Dallas
Dallas
TX

2,318

38,702


2,318

38,702

41,020

3,591

37,429

2009
2015
35 years
Baylor Institute for Rehabilition - Ft. Worth TX
Fort Worth
TX

2,071

16,018


2,071

16,018

18,089

1,613

16,476

2008
2015
35 years
Kindred Hospital - Tarrant County (Fort Worth Southwest)
Fort Worth
TX

2,342

7,458


2,342

7,458

9,800

7,505

2,295

1987
1986
20 years
Rehabilitation Hospital The Vintage
Houston
TX

1,838

34,832


1,838

34,832

36,670

3,390

33,280

2012
2015
35 years
Kindred Hospital (Houston Northwest)
Houston
TX

1,699

6,788


1,699

6,788

8,487

5,778

2,709

1986
1985
40 years
Kindred Hospital - Houston
Houston
TX

33

7,062


33

7,062

7,095

6,667

428

1972
1994
20 years
Kindred Hospital - Mansfield
Mansfield
TX

267

2,462


267

2,462

2,729

2,015

714

1983
1990
40 years
Select Rehabilitation - San Antonio TX
San Antonio
TX

1,859

18,301


1,859

18,301

20,160

1,807

18,353

2010
2015
35 years
Kindred Hospital - San Antonio
San Antonio
TX

249

11,413


249

11,413

11,662

9,533

2,129

1981
1993
30 years
TOTAL FOR IRFS AND LTACS
 
 

47,061

404,512

1,415

47,061

405,927

452,988

222,482

230,506

 
 
 
SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES
 
 


  

  

  

  

  

 
  

 
 
 
 
Englewood Post Acute and Rehabilitation
Englewood
CO

241

2,180

194

241

2,374

2,615

2,015

600

1960
1995
30 years
Brookdale Lisle SNF
Lisle
IL

730

9,270


730

9,270

10,000

2,863

7,137

1990
2009
35 years
Lopatcong Center
Phillipsburg
NJ

1,490

12,336


1,490

12,336

13,826

6,031

7,795

1982
2004
30 years
Marietta Convalescent Center
Marietta
OH

158

3,266

75

158

3,341

3,499

3,288

211

1972
1993
25 years
The Belvedere
Chester
PA

822

7,203


822

7,203

8,025

3,511

4,514

1899
2004
30 years
Pennsburg Manor
Pennsburg
PA

1,091

7,871


1,091

7,871

8,962

3,889

5,073

1982
2004
30 years
Chapel Manor
Philadelphia
PA

1,595

13,982

1,358

1,595

15,340

16,935

7,805

9,130

1948
2004
30 years
Wayne Center
Strafford
PA

662

6,872

850

662

7,722

8,384

4,148

4,236

1897
2004
30 years
Everett Rehabilitation & Care
Everett
WA

2,750

27,337


2,750

27,337

30,087

5,456

24,631

1995
2011
35 years
Northwest Continuum Care Center
Longview
WA

145

2,563

171

145

2,734

2,879

2,377

502

1955
1992
29 years
Columbia Crest Care & Rehabilitation Center
Moses Lake
WA

660

17,439


660

17,439

18,099

3,564

14,535

1972
2011
35 years
Lake Ridge Solana Alzheimer's Care Center
Moses Lake
WA

660

8,866


660

8,866

9,526

1,886

7,640

1988
2011
35 years
Rainier Vista Care Center
Puyallup
WA

520

4,780

305

520

5,085

5,605

3,355

2,250

1986
1991
40 years
Logan Center
Logan
WV

300

12,959


300

12,959

13,259

2,597

10,662

1987
2011
35 years
Ravenswood Healthcare Center
Ravenswood
WV

320

12,710


320

12,710

13,030

2,556

10,474

1987
2011
35 years
Valley Center
South Charleston
WV

750

24,115


750

24,115

24,865

4,897

19,968

1987
2011
35 years
White Sulphur
White Sulphur Springs
WV

250

13,055


250

13,055

13,305

2,641

10,664

1987
2011
35 years
TOTAL FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES
 
 

13,144

186,804

2,953

13,144

189,757

202,901

62,879

140,022

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
HEALTH SYSTEMS
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


145


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Lovelace Medical Center Downtown
Albuquerque
NM

9,840

156,535

5,319

9,928

161,766

171,694

12,499

159,195

1968
2015
33 years
Lovelace Westside Hospital
Albuquerque
NM

10,107

18,501

(3,873
)
10,107

14,628

24,735

2,879

21,856

1984
2015
20 years
Lovelace Women's Hospital
Albuquerque
NM

7,236

183,866

10,317

7,236

194,183

201,419

10,423

190,996

1983
2015
47 years
Roswell Regional Hospital
Roswell
NM

2,560

41,164

1,509

2,560

42,673

45,233

2,380

42,853

2007
2015
47 years
Hillcrest Hospital Claremore
Claremore
OK

3,623

34,359

(10,268
)
3,623

24,091

27,714

1,716

25,998

1955
2015
40 years
Bailey Medical Center
Owasso
OK

4,964

8,969

(1,782
)
4,964

7,187

12,151

799

11,352

2006
2015
32 years
Hillcrest Medical Center
Tulsa
OK

28,319

215,199

8,605

28,319

223,804

252,123

16,487

235,636

1928
2015
34 years
Hillcrest Hospital South
Tulsa
OK

17,026

100,892

12,243

17,026

113,135

130,161

7,535

122,626

1999
2015
40 years
Baptist St. Anthony's Hospital
Amarillo
TX

13,779

358,029

13,713

13,015

372,506

385,521

20,940

364,581

1967
2015
44 years
Spire Hull and East Riding Hospital
Anlaby
UK

3,194

81,613

(11,223
)
2,771

70,813

73,584

5,425

68,159

2010
2014
50 years
Spire Fylde Coast Hospital
Blackpool
UK

2,446

28,896

(4,148
)
2,122

25,072

27,194

1,949

25,245

1980
2014
50 years
Spire Clare Park Hospital
Farnham
UK

6,263

26,119

(4,286
)
5,434

22,662

28,096

1,831

26,265

2009
2014
50 years
TOTAL FOR HEALTH SYSTEMS
 
 

109,357

1,254,142

16,126

107,105

1,272,520

1,379,625

84,863

1,294,762

 
 
 
BROOKDALE SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Brookdale Chandler Ray Road
Chandler
AZ

2,000

6,538


2,000

6,538

8,538

1,418

7,120

1998
2011
35 years
Brookdale Springs Mesa
Mesa
AZ

2,747

24,918


2,747

24,918

27,665

10,793

16,872

1986
2005
35 years
Brookdale East Arbor
Mesa
AZ

655

6,998


655

6,998

7,653

3,009

4,644

1998
2005
35 years
Brookdale Oro Valley
Oro Valley
AZ

666

6,169


666

6,169

6,835

2,653

4,182

1998
2005
35 years
Brookdale Peoria
Peoria
AZ

598

4,872


598

4,872

5,470

2,095

3,375

1998
2005
35 years
Brookdale Tempe
Tempe
AZ

611

4,066


611

4,066

4,677

1,748

2,929

1997
2005
35 years
Brookdale East Tucson
Tucson
AZ

506

4,745


506

4,745

5,251

2,040

3,211

1998
2005
35 years
Brookdale Anaheim
Anaheim
CA

2,464

7,908


2,464

7,908

10,372

3,148

7,224

1977
2005
35 years
Brookdale Redwood City
Redwood City
CA

7,669

66,691


7,669

66,691

74,360

29,097

45,263

1988
2005
35 years
Brookdale San Jose
San Jose
CA

6,240

66,329

12,838

6,240

79,167

85,407

29,510

55,897

1987
2005
35 years
Brookdale San Marcos
San Marcos
CA

4,288

36,204


4,288

36,204

40,492

15,879

24,613

1987
2005
35 years
Brookdale Tracy
Tracy
CA

1,110

13,296


1,110

13,296

14,406

4,974

9,432

1986
2005
35 years
Brookdale Boulder Creek
Boulder
CO

1,290

20,683


1,290

20,683

21,973

4,217

17,756

1985
2011
35 years
Brookdale Vista Grande
Colorado Springs
CO

715

9,279


715

9,279

9,994

3,990

6,004

1997
2005
35 years
Brookdale El Camino
Pueblo
CO
4,773

840

9,403


840

9,403

10,243

4,043

6,200

1997
2005
35 years
Brookdale Farmington
Farmington
CT

3,995

36,310


3,995

36,310

40,305

15,722

24,583

1984
2005
35 years
Brookdale South Windsor
South Windsor
CT

2,187

12,682


2,187

12,682

14,869

5,004

9,865

1999
2004
35 years
Brookdale Chatfield
West Hartford
CT

2,493

22,833

22,296

2,493

45,129

47,622

10,806

36,816

1989
2005
35 years
Brookdale Bonita Springs
Bonita Springs
FL
8,599

1,540

10,783


1,540

10,783

12,323

4,580

7,743

1989
2005
35 years
Brookdale West Boynton Beach
Boynton Beach
FL
13,178

2,317

16,218


2,317

16,218

18,535

6,731

11,804

1999
2005
35 years
Brookdale Deer Creek AL/MC
Deerfield Beach
FL

1,399

9,791


1,399

9,791

11,190

4,369

6,821

1999
2005
35 years
Brookdale Fort Myers The Colony
Fort Myers
FL

1,510

7,862


1,510

7,862

9,372

1,587

7,785

1996
2011
35 years
Brookdale Avondale
Jacksonville
FL

860

16,745


860

16,745

17,605

3,264

14,341

1997
2011
35 years

146


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Brookdale Crown Point
Jacksonville
FL

1,300

9,659


1,300

9,659

10,959

1,927

9,032

1997
2011
35 years
Brookdale Jensen Beach
Jensen Beach
FL
11,825

1,831

12,820


1,831

12,820

14,651

5,431

9,220

1999
2005
35 years
Brookdale Ormond Beach West
Ormond Beach
FL

1,660

9,738


1,660

9,738

11,398

1,957

9,441

1997
2011
35 years
Brookdale Palm Coast
Palm Coast
FL

470

9,187


470

9,187

9,657

1,861

7,796

1997
2011
35 years
Brookdale Pensacola
Pensacola
FL

633

6,087


633

6,087

6,720

2,617

4,103

1998
2005
35 years
Brookdale Rotonda
Rotonda West
FL

1,740

4,331


1,740

4,331

6,071

1,043

5,028

1997
2011
35 years
Brookdale Centre Pointe Boulevard
Tallahassee
FL
4,239

667

6,168


667

6,168

6,835

2,652

4,183

1998
2005
35 years
Brookdale Tavares
Tavares
FL

280

15,980


280

15,980

16,260

3,129

13,131

1997
2011
35 years
Brookdale West Melbourne MC
West Melbourne
FL
6,041

586

5,481


586

5,481

6,067

2,357

3,710

2000
2005
35 years
Brookdale West Palm Beach
West Palm Beach
FL

3,758

33,072


3,758

33,072

36,830

14,400

22,430

1990
2005
35 years
Brookdale Winter Haven MC
Winter Haven
FL

232

3,006


232

3,006

3,238

1,293

1,945

1997
2005
35 years
Brookdale Winter Haven AL
Winter Haven
FL

438

5,549


438

5,549

5,987

2,386

3,601

1997
2005
35 years
Brookdale Twin Falls
Twin Falls
ID

703

6,153


703

6,153

6,856

2,646

4,210

1997
2005
35 years
Brookdale Lake Shore Drive
Chicago
IL

11,057

107,517

3,266

11,057

110,783

121,840

47,637

74,203

1990
2005
35 years
Brookdale Lake View
Chicago
IL

3,072

26,668


3,072

26,668

29,740

11,639

18,101

1950
2005
35 years
Brookdale Des Plaines
Des Plaines
IL
32,000

6,871

60,165

(41
)
6,805

60,190

66,995

26,219

40,776

1993
2005
35 years
Brookdale Hoffman Estates
Hoffman Estates
IL

3,886

44,130


3,886

44,130

48,016

18,461

29,555

1987
2005
35 years
Brookdale Lisle IL/AL
Lisle
IL
33,000

7,953

70,400


7,953

70,400

78,353

30,621

47,732

1990
2005
35 years
Brookdale Northbrook
Northbrook
IL

1,988

39,762


1,988

39,762

41,750

16,011

25,739

1999
2004
35 years
Brookdale Hawthorn Lakes IL/AL
Vernon Hills
IL

4,439

35,044


4,439

35,044

39,483

15,563

23,920

1987
2005
35 years
Brookdale Hawthorn Lakes AL
Vernon Hills
IL

1,147

10,041


1,147

10,041

11,188

4,376

6,812

1999
2005
35 years
Brookdale Evansville
Evansville
IN
3,401

357

3,765


357

3,765

4,122

1,619

2,503

1998
2005
35 years
Brookdale Castleton
Indianapolis
IN

1,280

11,515


1,280

11,515

12,795

4,994

7,801

1986
2005
35 years
Brookdale Marion AL (IN)
Marion
IN

207

3,570


207

3,570

3,777

1,535

2,242

1998
2005
35 years
Brookdale Portage AL
Portage
IN

128

3,649


128

3,649

3,777

1,569

2,208

1999
2005
35 years
Brookdale Richmond
Richmond
IN

495

4,124


495

4,124

4,619

1,773

2,846

1998
2005
35 years
Brookdale Derby
Derby
KS

440

4,422


440

4,422

4,862

911

3,951

1994
2011
35 years
Brookdale Leawood State Line
Leawood
KS
3,463

117

5,127


117

5,127

5,244

2,205

3,039

2000
2005
35 years
Brookdale Salina Fairdale
Salina
KS

300

5,657


300

5,657

5,957

1,166

4,791

1996
2011
35 years
Brookdale Topeka
Topeka
KS
4,638

370

6,825


370

6,825

7,195

2,935

4,260

2000
2005
35 years
Brookdale Wellington
Wellington
KS

310

2,434


310

2,434

2,744

542

2,202

1994
2011
35 years
Brookdale Cushing Park
Framingham
MA

5,819

33,361

2,430

5,819

35,791

41,610

13,440

28,170

1999
2004
35 years
Brookdale Cape Cod
Hyannis
MA

1,277

9,063


1,277

9,063

10,340

3,363

6,977

1999
2005
35 years
Brookdale Quincy Bay
Quincy
MA

6,101

57,862


6,101

57,862

63,963

24,877

39,086

1986
2005
35 years
Brookdale Davison
Davison
MI

160

3,189

2,543

160

5,732

5,892

1,630

4,262

1997
2011
35 years

147


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Brookdale Delta MC
Delta Township
MI

730

11,471


730

11,471

12,201

2,283

9,918

1998
2011
35 years
Brookdale Delta AL
Delta Township
MI

820

3,313


820

3,313

4,133

922

3,211

1998
2011
35 years
Brookdale Farmington Hills North
Farmington Hills
MI

580

10,497


580

10,497

11,077

2,338

8,739

1994
2011
35 years
Brookdale Farmington Hills North II
Farmington Hills
MI

700

10,246


700

10,246

10,946

2,370

8,576

1994
2011
35 years
Brookdale Meridian AL
Haslett
MI

1,340

6,134


1,340

6,134

7,474

1,351

6,123

1998
2011
35 years
Brookdale Grand Blanc MC
Holly
MI

450

12,373


450

12,373

12,823

2,469

10,354

1998
2011
35 years
Brookdale Grand Blanc AL
Holly
MI

620

14,627


620

14,627

15,247

2,944

12,303

1998
2011
35 years
Brookdale Northville
Northville
MI
6,820

407

6,068


407

6,068

6,475

2,609

3,866

1996
2005
35 years
Brookdale Troy MC
Troy
MI

630

17,178


630

17,178

17,808

3,394

14,414

1998
2011
35 years
Brookdale Troy AL
Troy
MI

950

12,503


950

12,503

13,453

2,634

10,819

1998
2011
35 years
Brookdale Utica AL
Utica
MI

1,142

11,808


1,142

11,808

12,950

5,077

7,873

1996
2005
35 years
Brookdale Utica MC
Utica
MI

700

8,657


700

8,657

9,357

1,837

7,520

1995
2011
35 years
Brookdale Eden Prairie
Eden Prairie
MN

301

6,228


301

6,228

6,529

2,678

3,851

1998
2005
35 years
Brookdale Faribault
Faribault
MN

530

1,085


530

1,085

1,615

275

1,340

1997
2011
35 years
Brookdale Inver Grove Heights
Inver Grove Heights
MN
2,716

253

2,655


253

2,655

2,908

1,142

1,766

1997
2005
35 years
Brookdale Mankato
Mankato
MN

490

410


490

410

900

195

705

1996
2011
35 years
Brookdale Edina
Minneapolis
MN
15,040

3,621

33,141

22,975

3,621

56,116

59,737

16,010

43,727

1998
2005
35 years
Brookdale North Oaks
North Oaks
MN

1,057

8,296


1,057

8,296

9,353

3,567

5,786

1998
2005
35 years
Brookdale Plymouth
Plymouth
MN

679

8,675


679

8,675

9,354

3,730

5,624

1998
2005
35 years
Brookdale Willmar
Wilmar
MN

470

4,833


470

4,833

5,303

971

4,332

1997
2011
35 years
Brookdale Winona
Winona
MN

800

1,390


800

1,390

2,190

565

1,625

1997
2011
35 years
Brookdale West County
Ballwin
MO

3,100

35,074

51

3,104

35,121

38,225

3,873

34,352

2012
2014
35 years
Brookdale Evesham
Voorhees Township
NJ

3,158

29,909


3,158

29,909

33,067

12,861

20,206

1987
2005
35 years
Brookdale Westampton
Westampton
NJ

881

4,741


881

4,741

5,622

2,039

3,583

1997
2005
35 years
Brookdale Santa Fe
Santa Fe
NM


28,178



28,178

28,178

11,878

16,300

1986
2005
35 years
Brookdale Kenmore
Buffalo
NY
12,716

1,487

15,170


1,487

15,170

16,657

6,523

10,134

1995
2005
35 years
Brookdale Clinton IL
Clinton
NY

947

7,528


947

7,528

8,475

3,237

5,238

1991
2005
35 years
Brookdale Manlius
Manlius
NY

890

28,237


890

28,237

29,127

5,530

23,597

1994
2011
35 years
Brookdale Pittsford
Pittsford
NY

611

4,066


611

4,066

4,677

1,748

2,929

1997
2005
35 years
Brookdale East Niskayuna
Schenectady
NY

1,021

8,333


1,021

8,333

9,354

3,583

5,771

1997
2005
35 years
Brookdale Niskayuna
Schenectady
NY
15,895

1,884

16,103


1,884

16,103

17,987

6,924

11,063

1996
2005
35 years
Brookdale Summerfield
Syracuse
NY

1,132

11,434


1,132

11,434

12,566

4,916

7,650

1991
2005
35 years
Brookdale Williamsville
Williamsville
NY
6,574

839

3,841


839

3,841

4,680

1,652

3,028

1997
2005
35 years
Brookdale Cary
Cary
NC

724

6,466


724

6,466

7,190

2,780

4,410

1997
2005
35 years
Brookdale Falling Creek
Hickory
NC

330

10,981


330

10,981

11,311

2,187

9,124

1997
2011
35 years
Brookdale Winston-Salem
Winston-Salem
NC

368

3,497


368

3,497

3,865

1,504

2,361

1997
2005
35 years

148


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Brookdale Alliance
Alliance
OH
2,130

392

6,283


392

6,283

6,675

2,702

3,973

1998
2005
35 years
Brookdale Austintown
Austintown
OH

151

3,087


151

3,087

3,238

1,327

1,911

1999
2005
35 years
Brookdale Barberton
Barberton
OH

440

10,884


440

10,884

11,324

2,169

9,155

1997
2011
35 years
Brookdale Beavercreek
Beavercreek
OH

587

5,381


587

5,381

5,968

2,314

3,654

1998
2005
35 years
Brookdale Centennial Park
Clayton
OH

630

6,477


630

6,477

7,107

1,351

5,756

1997
2011
35 years
Brookdale Westerville
Columbus
OH
1,768

267

3,600


267

3,600

3,867

1,548

2,319

1999
2005
35 years
Brookdale Greenville AL/MC
Greenville
OH

490

4,144


490

4,144

4,634

993

3,641

1997
2011
35 years
Brookdale Marion AL/MC (OH)
Marion
OH

620

3,306


620

3,306

3,926

769

3,157

1998
2011
35 years
Brookdale Salem AL (OH)
Salem
OH

634

4,659


634

4,659

5,293

2,003

3,290

1998
2005
35 years
Brookdale Springdale
Springdale
OH

1,140

9,134


1,140

9,134

10,274

1,844

8,430

1997
2011
35 years
Brookdale Bartlesville South
Bartlesville
OK

250

10,529


250

10,529

10,779

2,073

8,706

1997
2011
35 years
Brookdale Bethany
Bethany
OK

390

1,499


390

1,499

1,889

374

1,515

1994
2011
35 years
Brookdale Broken Arrow
Broken Arrow
OK

940

6,312

6,410

1,873

11,789

13,662

2,436

11,226

1996
2011
35 years
Brookdale Forest Grove
Forest Grove
OR

2,320

9,633


2,320

9,633

11,953

2,118

9,835

1994
2011
35 years
Brookdale Mt. Hood
Gresham
OR

2,410

9,093


2,410

9,093

11,503

2,001

9,502

1988
2011
35 years
Brookdale McMinnville Town Center
McMinnville
OR
1,051

1,230

7,561


1,230

7,561

8,791

1,837

6,954

1989
2011
35 years
Brookdale Denton North
Denton
TX

1,750

6,712


1,750

6,712

8,462

1,372

7,090

1996
2011
35 years
Brookdale Ennis
Ennis
TX

460

3,284


460

3,284

3,744

727

3,017

1996
2011
35 years
Brookdale Kerrville
Kerrville
TX

460

8,548


460

8,548

9,008

1,706

7,302

1997
2011
35 years
Brookdale Medical Center Whitby
San Antonio
TX

1,400

10,051


1,400

10,051

11,451

2,031

9,420

1997
2011
35 years
Brookdale Western Hills
Temple
TX

330

5,081


330

5,081

5,411

1,079

4,332

1997
2011
35 years
Brookdale Salem AL (VA)
Salem
VA

1,900

16,219


1,900

16,219

18,119

6,696

11,423

1998
2011
35 years
Brookdale Alderwood
Lynnwood
WA

1,219

9,573


1,219

9,573

10,792

4,117

6,675

1999
2005
35 years
Brookdale Puyallup South
Puyallup
WA
9,268

1,055

8,298


1,055

8,298

9,353

3,568

5,785

1998
2005
35 years
Brookdale Richland
Richland
WA

960

23,270


960

23,270

24,230

4,758

19,472

1990
2011
35 years
Brookdale Park Place
Spokane
WA

1,622

12,895


1,622

12,895

14,517

5,719

8,798

1915
2005
35 years
Brookdale Allenmore AL
Tacoma
WA

620

16,186


620

16,186

16,806

3,209

13,597

1997
2011
35 years
Brookdale Allenmore - IL
Tacoma
WA

1,710

3,326


1,710

3,326

5,036

999

4,037

1988
2011
35 years
Brookdale Yakima
Yakima
WA

860

15,276


860

15,276

16,136

3,120

13,016

1998
2011
35 years
Brookdale Kenosha
Kenosha
WI

551

5,431

2,772

551

8,203

8,754

3,077

5,677

2000
2005
35 years
Brookdale LaCrosse MC
La Crosse
WI

621

4,056

1,126

621

5,182

5,803

2,046

3,757

2004
2005
35 years
Brookdale LaCrosse AL
La Crosse
WI

644

5,831

2,637

644

8,468

9,112

3,215

5,897

1998
2005
35 years
Brookdale Middleton Century Ave
Middleton
WI

360

5,041


360

5,041

5,401

1,016

4,385

1997
2011
35 years
Brookdale Onalaska
Onalaska
WI

250

4,949


250

4,949

5,199

992

4,207

1995
2011
35 years
Brookdale Sun Prairie
Sun Prairie
WI

350

1,131


350

1,131

1,481

283

1,198

1994
2011
35 years
TOTAL FOR BROOKDALE SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES
 
 
199,135

185,427

1,768,730

79,303

186,298

1,847,162

2,033,460

655,647

1,377,813

 
 
 
SUNRISE SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


149


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Sunrise of Chandler
Chandler
AZ

4,344

14,455

807

4,439

15,167

19,606

3,095

16,511

2007
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Scottsdale
Scottsdale
AZ

2,229

27,575

750

2,255

28,299

30,554

9,100

21,454

2007
2007
35 years
Sunrise at River Road
Tucson
AZ

2,971

12,399

435

3,000

12,805

15,805

2,421

13,384

2008
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Lynn Valley
Vancouver
BC

11,759

37,424

(8,888
)
9,293

31,002

40,295

9,781

30,514

2002
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Vancouver
Vancouver
BC

6,649

31,937

996

6,662

32,920

39,582

10,728

28,854

2005
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Victoria
Victoria
BC

8,332

29,970

(6,486
)
6,664

25,152

31,816

8,030

23,786

2001
2007
35 years
Sunrise at La Costa
Carlsbad
CA

4,890

20,590

1,549

5,030

21,999

27,029

7,600

19,429

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Carmichael
Carmichael
CA

1,269

14,598

519

1,284

15,102

16,386

2,963

13,423

2009
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Fair Oaks
Fair Oaks
CA

1,456

23,679

2,283

2,506

24,912

27,418

8,255

19,163

2001
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Mission Viejo
Mission Viejo
CA

3,802

24,560

1,515

3,867

26,010

29,877

8,694

21,183

1998
2007
35 years
Sunrise at Canyon Crest
Riverside
CA

5,486

19,658

1,935

5,577

21,502

27,079

7,140

19,939

2006
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Rocklin
Rocklin
CA

1,378

23,565

967

1,411

24,499

25,910

7,971

17,939

2007
2007
35 years
Sunrise of San Mateo
San Mateo
CA

2,682

35,335

1,718

2,705

37,030

39,735

11,782

27,953

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Sunnyvale
Sunnyvale
CA

2,933

34,361

1,186

2,969

35,511

38,480

11,427

27,053

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise at Sterling Canyon
Valencia
CA

3,868

29,293

4,732

4,078

33,815

37,893

11,716

26,177

1998
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Westlake Village
Westlake Village
CA

4,935

30,722

1,133

5,031

31,759

36,790

10,254

26,536

2004
2007
35 years
Sunrise at Yorba Linda
Yorba Linda
CA

1,689

25,240

1,631

1,765

26,795

28,560

8,605

19,955

2002
2007
35 years
Sunrise at Cherry Creek
Denver
CO

1,621

28,370

1,475

1,721

29,745

31,466

9,675

21,791

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise at Pinehurst
Denver
CO

1,417

30,885

2,090

1,653

32,739

34,392

11,123

23,269

1998
2007
35 years
Sunrise at Orchard
Littleton
CO

1,813

22,183

1,753

1,853

23,896

25,749

7,996

17,753

1997
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Westminster
Westminster
CO

2,649

16,243

1,696

2,792

17,796

20,588

5,986

14,602

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Stamford
Stamford
CT

4,612

28,533

2,128

5,029

30,244

35,273

10,237

25,036

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Jacksonville
Jacksonville
FL

2,390

17,671

335

2,420

17,976

20,396

3,541

16,855

2009
2012
35 years
Sunrise at Ivey Ridge
Alpharetta
GA

1,507

18,516

1,500

1,517

20,006

21,523

6,642

14,881

1998
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Huntcliff Summit I
Atlanta
GA

4,232

66,161

17,045

4,185

83,253

87,438

28,310

59,128

1987
2007
35 years
Sunrise at Huntcliff Summit II
Atlanta
GA

2,154

17,137

2,291

2,160

19,422

21,582

6,668

14,914

1998
2007
35 years
Sunrise at East Cobb
Marietta
GA

1,797

23,420

1,723

1,806

25,134

26,940

8,371

18,569

1997
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Barrington
Barrington
IL

859

15,085

595

892

15,647

16,539

3,114

13,425

2007
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Bloomingdale
Bloomingdale
IL

1,287

38,625

2,056

1,382

40,586

41,968

12,980

28,988

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Buffalo Grove
Buffalo Grove
IL

2,154

28,021

1,547

2,339

29,383

31,722

9,652

22,070

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Lincoln Park
Chicago
IL

3,485

26,687

2,205

3,504

28,873

32,377

8,753

23,624

2003
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Naperville
Naperville
IL

1,946

28,538

2,639

2,622

30,501

33,123

10,347

22,776

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Palos Park
Palos Park
IL

2,363

42,205

1,278

2,394

43,452

45,846

14,012

31,834

2001
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Park Ridge
Park Ridge
IL

5,533

39,557

2,828

5,677

42,241

47,918

13,668

34,250

1998
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Willowbrook
Willowbrook
IL

1,454

60,738

2,651

2,080

62,763

64,843

18,572

46,271

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise on Old Meridian
Carmel
IN

8,550

31,746

806

8,550

32,552

41,102

6,307

34,795

2009
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Leawood
Leawood
KS

651

16,401

906

768

17,190

17,958

3,146

14,812

2006
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Overland Park
Overland Park
KS

650

11,015

482

660

11,487

12,147

2,368

9,779

2007
2012
35 years

150


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Sunrise of Baton Rouge
Baton Rouge
LA

1,212

23,547

1,606

1,382

24,983

26,365

8,192

18,173

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Arlington
Arlington
MA

86

34,393

1,059

107

35,431

35,538

11,655

23,883

2001
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Norwood
Norwood
MA

2,230

30,968

2,053

2,306

32,945

35,251

10,707

24,544

1997
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Columbia
Columbia
MD

1,780

23,083

2,923

1,918

25,868

27,786

8,298

19,488

1996
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Rockville
Rockville
MD

1,039

39,216

2,660

1,066

41,849

42,915

12,915

30,000

1997
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Bloomfield
Bloomfield Hills
MI

3,736

27,657

1,981

3,860

29,514

33,374

9,478

23,896

2006
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Cascade
Grand Rapids
MI

1,273

21,782

609

1,364

22,300

23,664

4,256

19,408

2007
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Northville
Plymouth
MI

1,445

26,090

1,365

1,525

27,375

28,900

9,061

19,839

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Rochester
Rochester
MI

2,774

38,666

1,284

2,846

39,878

42,724

12,877

29,847

1998
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Troy
Troy
MI

1,758

23,727

928

1,860

24,553

26,413

8,168

18,245

2001
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Edina
Edina
MN

3,181

24,224

2,915

3,270

27,050

30,320

9,050

21,270

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise on Providence
Charlotte
NC

1,976

19,472

2,340

1,988

21,800

23,788

7,128

16,660

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of East Brunswick
East Brunswick
NJ

2,784

26,173

2,252

3,030

28,179

31,209

9,680

21,529

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Jackson
Jackson
NJ

4,009

15,029

587

4,013

15,612

19,625

3,218

16,407

2008
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Morris Plains
Morris Plains
NJ
17,488

1,492

32,052

2,003

1,569

33,978

35,547

11,078

24,469

1997
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Old Tappan
Old Tappan
NJ
16,241

2,985

36,795

2,032

3,106

38,706

41,812

12,611

29,201

1997
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Wall
Wall Township
NJ

1,053

19,101

2,022

1,088

21,088

22,176

6,657

15,519

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Wayne
Wayne
NJ
12,901

1,288

24,990

2,475

1,304

27,449

28,753

8,907

19,846

1996
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Westfield
Westfield
NJ
17,095

5,057

23,803

2,119

5,136

25,843

30,979

8,666

22,313

1996
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Woodcliff Lake
Woodcliff Lake
NJ

3,493

30,801

1,368

3,537

32,125

35,662

10,744

24,918

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise of North Lynbrook
Lynbrook
NY

4,622

38,087

1,985

4,700

39,994

44,694

13,556

31,138

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise at Fleetwood
Mount Vernon
NY

4,381

28,434

2,393

4,531

30,677

35,208

10,289

24,919

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of New City
New City
NY

1,906

27,323

1,764

1,950

29,043

30,993

9,584

21,409

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Smithtown
Smithtown
NY

2,853

25,621

2,467

3,040

27,901

30,941

9,703

21,238

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Staten Island
Staten Island
NY

7,237

23,910

438

7,288

24,297

31,585

10,408

21,177

2006
2007
35 years
Sunrise at North Hills
Raleigh
NC

749

37,091

5,417

849

42,408

43,257

13,895

29,362

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise at Parma
Cleveland
OH

695

16,641

1,214

890

17,660

18,550

5,944

12,606

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Cuyahoga Falls
Cuyahoga Falls
OH

626

10,239

1,542

783

11,624

12,407

4,064

8,343

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Aurora
Aurora
ON

1,570

36,113

(6,664
)
1,274

29,745

31,019

9,530

21,489

2002
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Burlington
Burlington
ON

1,173

24,448

832

1,192

25,261

26,453

7,976

18,477

2001
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Unionville
Markham
ON

2,322

41,140

(7,621
)
1,908

33,933

35,841

10,824

25,017

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Mississauga
Mississauga
ON

3,554

33,631

(6,495
)
2,915

27,775

30,690

8,905

21,785

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Erin Mills
Mississauga
ON

1,957

27,020

(5,045
)
1,593

22,339

23,932

7,338

16,594

2007
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Oakville
Oakville
ON

2,753

37,489

1,331

2,759

38,814

41,573

12,186

29,387

2002
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Richmond Hill
Richmond Hill
ON

2,155

41,254

(7,840
)
1,733

33,836

35,569

10,658

24,911

2002
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Thornhill
Vaughan
ON

2,563

57,513

(8,758
)
1,420

49,898

51,318

14,898

36,420

2003
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Windsor
Windsor
ON

1,813

20,882

838

1,834

21,699

23,533

6,944

16,589

2001
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Abington
Abington
PA
22

1,838

53,660

5,116

2,015

58,599

60,614

18,706

41,908

1997
2007
35 years

151


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Sunrise of Blue Bell
Blue Bell
PA

1,765

23,920

3,101

1,827

26,959

28,786

8,931

19,855

2006
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Exton
Exton
PA

1,123

17,765

1,705

1,191

19,402

20,593

6,604

13,989

2000
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Haverford
Haverford
PA
6,893

941

25,872

2,217

983

28,047

29,030

9,017

20,013

1997
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Granite Run
Media
PA
10,609

1,272

31,781

2,344

1,369

34,028

35,397

11,046

24,351

1997
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Lower Makefield
Morrisville
PA

3,165

21,337

587

3,167

21,922

25,089

4,324

20,765

2008
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Westtown
West Chester
PA

1,547

22,996

2,144

1,570

25,117

26,687

8,576

18,111

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Hillcrest
Dallas
TX

2,616

27,680

822

2,626

28,492

31,118

9,253

21,865

2006
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Fort Worth
Fort Worth
TX

2,024

18,587

813

2,116

19,308

21,424

3,857

17,567

2007
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Frisco
Frisco
TX

2,523

14,547

465

2,535

15,000

17,535

2,649

14,886

2009
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Cinco Ranch
Katy
TX

2,512

21,600

1,108

2,580

22,640

25,220

4,382

20,838

2007
2012
35 years
Sunrise at Holladay
Holladay
UT

2,542

44,771

843

2,581

45,575

48,156

8,639

39,517

2008
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Sandy
Sandy
UT

2,576

22,987

321

2,618

23,266

25,884

7,755

18,129

2007
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Alexandria
Alexandria
VA

88

14,811

2,260

240

16,919

17,159

6,079

11,080

1998
2007
35 years
Sunrise of Richmond
Richmond
VA

1,120

17,446

1,205

1,164

18,607

19,771

6,495

13,276

1999
2007
35 years
Sunrise at Bon Air
Richmond
VA

2,047

22,079

664

2,032

22,758

24,790

4,504

20,286

2008
2012
35 years
Sunrise of Springfield
Springfield
VA
7,893

4,440

18,834

2,635

4,536

21,373

25,909

7,193

18,716

1997
2007
35 years
TOTAL FOR SUNRISE SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES
 
 
111,090

245,515

2,532,176

99,539

246,623

2,630,607

2,877,230

819,088

2,058,142

 
 
 
ATRIA SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Arbour Lake
Calgary
AB

2,512

39,188

(2,157
)
2,332

37,211

39,543

4,396

35,147

2003
2014
35 years
Canyon Meadows
Calgary
AB

1,617

30,803

(1,557
)
1,494

29,369

30,863

3,652

27,211

1995
2014
35 years
Churchill Manor
Edmonton
AB

2,865

30,482

(1,777
)
2,647

28,923

31,570

3,622

27,948

1999
2014
35 years
The View at Lethbridge
Lethbridge
AB

2,503

24,770

(1,545
)
2,313

23,415

25,728

3,153

22,575

2007
2014
35 years
Victoria Park
Red Deer
AB

1,188

22,554

(869
)
1,098

21,775

22,873

2,966

19,907

1999
2014
35 years
Ironwood Estates
St. Albert
AB

3,639

22,519

(1,112
)
3,377

21,669

25,046

2,925

22,121

1998
2014
35 years
Atria Regency
Mobile
AL

950

11,897

1,387

981

13,253

14,234

3,690

10,544

1996
2011
35 years
Atria Chandler Villas
Chandler
AZ

3,650

8,450

1,580

3,721

9,959

13,680

3,554

10,126

1988
2011
35 years
Atria Park of Sierra Pointe
Scottsdale
AZ

10,930

65,372

3,269

10,969

68,602

79,571

8,182

71,389

2000
2014
35 years
Atria Campana del Rio
Tucson
AZ

5,861

37,284

2,254

5,972

39,427

45,399

10,250

35,149

1964
2011
35 years
Atria Valley Manor
Tucson
AZ

1,709

60

819

1,768

820

2,588

417

2,171

1963
2011
35 years
Atria Bell Court Gardens
Tucson
AZ

3,010

30,969

1,969

3,060

32,888

35,948

7,677

28,271

1964
2011
35 years
Longlake Chateau
Nanaimo
BC

1,874

22,910

(1,018
)
1,738

22,028

23,766

3,011

20,755

1990
2014
35 years
Prince George Chateau
Prince George
BC

2,066

22,761

(1,449
)
1,909

21,469

23,378

2,909

20,469

2005
2014
35 years
The Victorian
Victoria
BC

3,419

16,351

(620
)
3,184

15,966

19,150

2,266

16,884

1988
2014
35 years
The Victorian at McKenzie
Victoria
BC

4,801

25,712

(1,529
)
4,440

24,544

28,984

3,231

25,753

2003
2014
35 years
Atria Burlingame
Burlingame
CA

2,494

12,373

1,522

2,523

13,866

16,389

3,606

12,783

1977
2011
35 years
Atria Las Posas
Camarillo
CA

4,500

28,436

1,206

4,518

29,624

34,142

6,855

27,287

1997
2011
35 years
Atria Carmichael Oaks
Carmichael
CA
18,015

2,118

49,694

2,192

2,147

51,857

54,004

8,944

45,060

1992
2013
35 years
Atria El Camino Gardens
Carmichael
CA

6,930

32,318

14,347

7,210

46,385

53,595

10,402

43,193

1984
2011
35 years

152


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria Covina
Covina
CA

170

4,131

693

250

4,744

4,994

1,509

3,485

1977
2011
35 years
Atria Daly City
Daly City
CA

3,090

13,448

1,113

3,102

14,549

17,651

3,660

13,991

1975
2011
35 years
Atria Covell Gardens
Davis
CA

2,163

39,657

11,064

2,382

50,502

52,884

13,083

39,801

1987
2011
35 years
Atria Encinitas
Encinitas
CA

5,880

9,212

1,785

5,942

10,935

16,877

2,917

13,960

1984
2011
35 years
Atria North Escondido
Escondido
CA

1,196

7,155

469

1,207

7,613

8,820

1,261

7,559

2002
2014
35 years
Atria Grass Valley
Grass Valley
CA
11,218

1,965

28,414

825

2,016

29,188

31,204

5,232

25,972

2000
2013
35 years
Atria Golden Creek
Irvine
CA

6,900

23,544

1,385

6,930

24,899

31,829

6,383

25,446

1985
2011
35 years
Atria Park of Lafayette
Lafayette
CA
18,916

5,679

56,922

1,137

5,886

57,852

63,738

9,403

54,335

2007
2013
35 years
Atria Del Sol
Mission Viejo
CA

3,500

12,458

8,590

3,781

20,767

24,548

5,623

18,925

1985
2011
35 years
Atria Newport Plaza
Newport Beach
CA

4,534

32,881


4,534

32,881

37,415


37,415

1989
2017
35 years
Atria Tamalpais Creek
Novato
CA

5,812

24,703

876

5,831

25,560

31,391

6,040

25,351

1978
2011
35 years
Atria Park of Pacific Palisades
Pacific Palisades
CA

4,458

17,064

1,705

4,489

18,738

23,227

6,607

16,620

2001
2007
35 years
Atria Palm Desert
Palm Desert
CA

2,887

9,843

1,239

3,115

10,854

13,969

4,663

9,306

1988
2011
35 years
Atria Hacienda
Palm Desert
CA

6,680

85,900

3,291

6,873

88,998

95,871

19,449

76,422

1989
2011
35 years
Atria Paradise
Paradise
CA

2,265

28,262

1,090

2,309

29,308

31,617

5,184

26,433

1999
2013
35 years
Atria Del Rey
Rancho Cucamonga
CA

3,290

17,427

5,470

3,464

22,723

26,187

7,237

18,950

1987
2011
35 years
Atria Rocklin
Rocklin
CA
19,221

4,427

52,064

872

4,439

52,924

57,363

5,339

52,024

2001
2015
35 years
Atria La Jolla
San Diego
CA

8,210

46,289


8,210

46,289

54,499


54,499

1984
2017
35 years
Atria Penasquitos
San Diego
CA

2,649

23,993


2,649

23,993

26,642


26,642

1991
2017
35 years
Atria Collwood
San Diego
CA

290

10,650

1,174

338

11,776

12,114

3,218

8,896

1976
2011
35 years
Atria Rancho Park
San Dimas
CA

4,066

14,306

1,628

4,613

15,387

20,000

4,566

15,434

1975
2011
35 years
Atria Chateau Gardens
San Jose
CA

39

487

644

49

1,121

1,170

1,159

11

1977
2011
35 years
Atria Willow Glen
San Jose
CA

8,521

43,168

2,931

8,590

46,030

54,620

9,642

44,978

1976
2011
35 years
Atria San Juan
San Juan Capistrano
CA

5,110

29,436

8,373

5,318

37,601

42,919

11,978

30,941

1985
2011
35 years
Atria Hillsdale
San Mateo
CA

5,240

15,956

4,441

5,253

20,384

25,637

4,146

21,491

1986
2011
35 years
Atria Santa Clarita
Santa Clarita
CA

3,880

38,366

932

3,890

39,288

43,178

4,024

39,154

2001
2015
35 years
Atria Bayside Landing
Stockton
CA


467

660


1,127

1,127

963

164

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Sunnyvale
Sunnyvale
CA

6,120

30,068

4,920

6,228

34,880

41,108

8,508

32,600

1977
2011
35 years
Atria Park of Tarzana
Tarzana
CA

960

47,547

889

974

48,422

49,396

7,718

41,678

2008
2013
35 years
Atria Park of Vintage Hills
Temecula
CA

4,674

44,341

2,068

4,879

46,204

51,083

8,308

42,775

2000
2013
35 years
Atria Park of Grand Oaks
Thousand Oaks
CA
21,965

5,994

50,309

916

6,055

51,164

57,219

8,886

48,333

2002
2013
35 years
Atria Hillcrest
Thousand Oaks
CA

6,020

25,635

10,103

6,624

35,134

41,758

11,103

30,655

1987
2011
35 years
Atria Walnut Creek
Walnut Creek
CA

6,910

15,797

16,728

7,626

31,809

39,435

9,916

29,519

1978
2011
35 years
Atria Valley View
Walnut Creek
CA

7,139

53,914

2,554

7,175

56,432

63,607

19,157

44,450

1977
2011
35 years
Atria Park of Applewood
Lakewood
CO

3,656

48,657

419

3,686

49,046

52,732

8,747

43,985

2008
2013
35 years
Atria Inn at Lakewood
Lakewood
CO

6,281

50,095

1,593

6,378

51,591

57,969

11,172

46,797

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Longmont
Longmont
CO

2,807

24,877

994

2,834

25,844

28,678

5,139

23,539

2009
2012
35 years
Atria Darien
Darien
CT

653

37,587

11,428

1,156

48,512

49,668

10,803

38,865

1997
2011
35 years

153


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria Larson Place
Hamden
CT

1,850

16,098

1,778

1,885

17,841

19,726

4,628

15,098

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Greenridge Place
Rocky Hill
CT

2,170

32,553

2,352

2,388

34,687

37,075

7,751

29,324

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Stamford
Stamford
CT

1,200

62,432

12,331

1,378

74,585

75,963

15,259

60,704

1975
2011
35 years
Atria Stratford
Stratford
CT

3,210

27,865

1,828

3,210

29,693

32,903

7,264

25,639

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Crossroads Place
Waterford
CT

2,401

36,495

7,789

2,577

44,108

46,685

10,926

35,759

2000
2011
35 years
Atria Hamilton Heights
West Hartford
CT

3,120

14,674

3,463

3,158

18,099

21,257

5,434

15,823

1904
2011
35 years
Atria Windsor Woods
Hudson
FL

1,610

32,432

2,048

1,687

34,403

36,090

8,650

27,440

1988
2011
35 years
Atria Park of Baypoint Village
Hudson
FL

2,083

28,841

8,612

2,350

37,186

39,536

9,753

29,783

1986
2011
35 years
Atria Park of San Pablo
Jacksonville
FL
5,388

1,620

14,920

921

1,660

15,801

17,461

3,764

13,697

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Park of St. Joseph's
Jupiter
FL
15,588

5,520

30,720

1,142

5,557

31,825

37,382

5,675

31,707

2007
2013
35 years
Atria Lady Lake
Lady Lake
FL

3,752

26,265

588

3,766

26,839

30,605

2,708

27,897

2010
2015
35 years
Atria Park of Lake Forest
Sanford
FL

3,589

32,586

4,027

3,886

36,316

40,202

8,356

31,846

2002
2011
35 years
Atria Evergreen Woods
Spring Hill
FL

2,370

28,371

3,510

2,533

31,718

34,251

8,911

25,340

1981
2011
35 years
Atria North Point
Alpharetta
GA
40,221

4,830

78,318

1,700

4,856

79,992

84,848

10,973

73,875

2007
2014
35 years
Atria Buckhead
Atlanta
GA

3,660

5,274

969

3,688

6,215

9,903

2,091

7,812

1996
2011
35 years
Atria Mableton
Austell
GA

1,911

18,879

479

1,946

19,323

21,269

3,447

17,822

2000
2013
35 years
Atria Johnson Ferry
Marietta
GA

990

6,453

657

995

7,105

8,100

1,895

6,205

1995
2011
35 years
Atria Park of Tucker
Tucker
GA

1,103

20,679

605

1,120

21,267

22,387

3,756

18,631

2000
2013
35 years
Atria Park of Glen Ellyn
Glen Ellyn
IL

2,455

34,064

3,060

2,634

36,945

39,579

12,230

27,349

2000
2007
35 years
Atria Newburgh
Newburgh
IN

1,150

22,880

748

1,150

23,628

24,778

5,335

19,443

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Hearthstone East
Topeka
KS

1,150

20,544

1,018

1,215

21,497

22,712

5,306

17,406

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Hearthstone West
Topeka
KS

1,230

28,379

2,322

1,245

30,686

31,931

7,885

24,046

1987
2011
35 years
Atria Highland Crossing
Covington
KY

1,677

14,393

1,440

1,689

15,821

17,510

4,554

12,956

1988
2011
35 years
Atria Summit Hills
Crestview Hills
KY

1,780

15,769

884

1,789

16,644

18,433

4,255

14,178

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Elizabethtown
Elizabethtown
KY

850

12,510

658

869

13,149

14,018

3,175

10,843

1996
2011
35 years
Atria St. Matthews
Louisville
KY

939

9,274

1,147

953

10,407

11,360

3,347

8,013

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Stony Brook
Louisville
KY

1,860

17,561

1,177

1,953

18,645

20,598

4,581

16,017

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Springdale
Louisville
KY

1,410

16,702

1,255

1,410

17,957

19,367

4,463

14,904

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Marland Place
Andover
MA

1,831

34,592

19,314

1,996

53,741

55,737

14,791

40,946

1996
2011
35 years
Atria Longmeadow Place
Burlington
MA

5,310

58,021

1,483

5,383

59,431

64,814

12,734

52,080

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Fairhaven
Fairhaven
MA

1,100

16,093

861

1,148

16,906

18,054

3,868

14,186

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Woodbriar Place
Falmouth
MA
15,940

4,630

27,314

5,566

6,433

31,077

37,510

6,341

31,169

2013
2013
35 years
Atria Woodbriar Park
Falmouth
MA

1,970

43,693

21,194

2,599

64,258

66,857

11,987

54,870

1975
2011
35 years
Atria Draper Place
Hopedale
MA

1,140

17,794

1,533

1,234

19,233

20,467

4,575

15,892

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Merrimack Place
Newburyport
MA

2,774

40,645

1,896

2,822

42,493

45,315

9,006

36,309

2000
2011
35 years
Atria Marina Place
Quincy
MA

2,590

33,899

1,589

2,755

35,323

38,078

8,150

29,928

1999
2011
35 years
Riverheights Terrace
Brandon
MB

799

27,708

(1,193
)
739

26,575

27,314

3,385

23,929

2001
2014
35 years
Amber Meadow
Winnipeg
MB

3,047

17,821

(431
)
2,817

17,620

20,437

2,685

17,752

2000
2014
35 years
The Westhaven
Winnipeg
MB

871

23,162

(1,222
)
816

21,995

22,811

2,959

19,852

1988
2014
35 years

154


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria Manresa
Annapolis
MD

4,193

19,000

1,822

4,465

20,550

25,015

5,052

19,963

1920
2011
35 years
Atria Salisbury
Salisbury
MD

1,940

24,500

780

1,959

25,261

27,220

5,557

21,663

1995
2011
35 years
Atria Kennebunk
Kennebunk
ME

1,090

23,496

1,127

1,117

24,596

25,713

5,806

19,907

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Park of Ann Arbor
Ann Arbor
MI

1,703

15,857

2,055

1,806

17,809

19,615

6,437

13,178

2001
2007
35 years
Atria Kinghaven
Riverview
MI
13,029

1,440

26,260

1,911

1,598

28,013

29,611

6,994

22,617

1987
2011
35 years
Ste. Anne's Court
Fredericton
NB

1,221

29,626

(1,214
)
1,131

28,502

29,633

3,580

26,053

2002
2014
35 years
Chateau de Champlain
St. John
NB

796

24,577

(854
)
747

23,772

24,519

3,174

21,345

2002
2014
35 years
Atria MerryWood
Charlotte
NC

1,678

36,892

2,487

1,724

39,333

41,057

9,919

31,138

1991
2011
35 years
Atria Southpoint Walk
Durham
NC
15,921

2,130

25,920

912

2,135

26,827

28,962

4,921

24,041

2009
2013
35 years
Atria Oakridge
Raleigh
NC
14,768

1,482

28,838

1,017

1,519

29,818

31,337

5,435

25,902

2009
2013
35 years
Atria Cranford
Cranford
NJ
25,067

8,260

61,411

4,730

8,382

66,019

74,401

15,581

58,820

1993
2011
35 years
Atria Tinton Falls
Tinton Falls
NJ

6,580

13,258

1,257

6,756

14,339

21,095

4,324

16,771

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Sunlake
Las Vegas
NV

7

732

958

15

1,682

1,697

1,664

33

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Sutton
Las Vegas
NV


863

1,130

48

1,945

1,993

1,697

296

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Seville
Las Vegas
NV


796

1,452

11

2,237

2,248

1,427

821

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Summit Ridge
Reno
NV

4

407

546

20

937

957

802

155

1997
2011
35 years
Atria Shaker
Albany
NY

1,520

29,667

1,217

1,626

30,778

32,404

7,071

25,333

1997
2011
35 years
Atria Crossgate
Albany
NY

1,080

20,599

1,089

1,100

21,668

22,768

5,221

17,547

1980
2011
35 years
Atria Woodlands
Ardsley
NY
45,490

7,660

65,581

2,397

7,718

67,920

75,638

15,345

60,293

2005
2011
35 years
Atria Bay Shore
Bay Shore
NY
15,275

4,440

31,983

1,853

4,448

33,828

38,276

7,914

30,362

1900
2011
35 years
Atria Briarcliff Manor
Briarcliff Manor
NY

6,560

33,885

2,003

6,725

35,723

42,448

8,673

33,775

1997
2011
35 years
Atria Riverdale
Bronx
NY

1,020

24,149

14,480

1,069

38,580

39,649

10,524

29,125

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Delmar Place
Delmar
NY

1,201

24,850

719

1,219

25,551

26,770

3,733

23,037

2004
2013
35 years
Atria East Northport
East Northport
NY

9,960

34,467

19,448

10,211

53,664

63,875

11,420

52,455

1996
2011
35 years
Atria Glen Cove
Glen Cove
NY

2,035

25,190

1,123

2,057

26,291

28,348

11,551

16,797

1997
2011
35 years
Atria Great Neck
Great Neck
NY

3,390

54,051

19,217

3,390

73,268

76,658

11,785

64,873

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Cutter Mill
Great Neck
NY

2,750

47,919

2,867

2,761

50,775

53,536

10,914

42,622

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Huntington
Huntington Station
NY

8,190

1,169

2,491

8,232

3,618

11,850

2,056

9,794

1987
2011
35 years
Atria Hertlin Place
Lake Ronkonkoma
NY

7,886

16,391

1,944

7,886

18,335

26,221

3,768

22,453

2002
2012
35 years
Atria Lynbrook
Lynbrook
NY

3,145

5,489

1,187

3,176

6,645

9,821

2,344

7,477

1996
2011
35 years
Atria Tanglewood
Lynbrook
NY
24,095

4,120

37,348

935

4,145

38,258

42,403

8,408

33,995

2005
2011
35 years
Atria West 86
New York
NY

80

73,685

5,856

167

79,454

79,621

18,543

61,078

1998
2011
35 years
Atria on the Hudson
Ossining
NY

8,123

63,089

4,114

8,191

67,135

75,326

16,163

59,163

1972
2011
35 years
Atria Penfield
Penfield
NY

620

22,036

967

723

22,900

23,623

5,383

18,240

1972
2011
35 years
Atria Plainview
Plainview
NY

2,480

16,060

1,590

2,630

17,500

20,130

4,446

15,684

2000
2011
35 years
Atria Rye Brook
Port Chester
NY
41,514

9,660

74,936

1,944

9,726

76,814

86,540

16,836

69,704

2004
2011
35 years
Atria Kew Gardens
Queens
NY

3,051

66,013

8,272

3,079

74,257

77,336

16,232

61,104

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Forest Hills
Queens
NY

2,050

16,680

1,244

2,074

17,900

19,974

4,360

15,614

2001
2011
35 years

155


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria Greece
Rochester
NY

410

14,967

1,041

639

15,779

16,418

3,893

12,525

1970
2011
35 years
Atria on Roslyn Harbor
Roslyn
NY
65,000

12,909

72,720

2,231

12,974

74,886

87,860

16,287

71,573

2006
2011
35 years
Atria Guilderland
Slingerlands
NY

1,170

22,414

601

1,171

23,014

24,185

5,225

18,960

1950
2011
35 years
Atria South Setauket
South Setauket
NY

8,450

14,534

1,514

8,832

15,666

24,498

5,403

19,095

1967
2011
35 years
The Court at Brooklin
Brooklin
ON

2,515

35,602

(1,674
)
2,346

34,097

36,443

4,141

32,302

2004
2014
35 years
Burlington Gardens
Burlington
ON

7,560

50,744

(3,614
)
7,009

47,681

54,690

5,602

49,088

2008
2014
35 years
The Court at Rushdale
Hamilton
ON

1,799

34,633

(1,379
)
1,663

33,390

35,053

4,040

31,013

2004
2014
35 years
Kingsdale Chateau
Kingston
ON

2,221

36,272

(1,383
)
2,059

35,051

37,110

4,247

32,863

2000
2014
35 years
Crystal View Lodge
Nepean
ON

1,587

37,243

(1,274
)
1,657

35,899

37,556

4,354

33,202

2000
2014
35 years
The Court at Barrhaven
Nepean
ON

1,778

33,922

(1,218
)
1,667

32,815

34,482

4,110

30,372

2004
2014
35 years
Stamford Estates
Niagara Falls
ON

1,414

29,439

(1,744
)
1,307

27,802

29,109

3,525

25,584

2005
2014
35 years
Sherbrooke Heights
Peterborough
ON

2,485

33,747

(1,280
)
2,300

32,652

34,952

4,122

30,830

2001
2014
35 years
Anchor Pointe
St. Catharines
ON

8,214

24,056

(1,790
)
7,593

22,887

30,480

3,259

27,221

2000
2014
35 years
The Court at Pringle Creek
Whitby
ON

2,965

39,206

(2,173
)
2,796

37,202

39,998

4,599

35,399

2002
2014
35 years
Atria Bethlehem
Bethlehem
PA

2,479

22,870

872

2,492

23,729

26,221

5,905

20,316

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Center City
Philadelphia
PA

3,460

18,291

15,109

3,475

33,385

36,860

5,427

31,433

1964
2011
35 years
Atria Woodbridge Place
Phoenixville
PA

1,510

19,130

990

1,526

20,104

21,630

4,941

16,689

1996
2011
35 years
Atria South Hills
Pittsburgh
PA

880

10,884

764

913

11,615

12,528

3,221

9,307

1998
2011
35 years
La Residence Steger
Saint-Laurent
QC

1,995

10,926

425

1,884

11,462

13,346

1,912

11,434

1999
2014
35 years
Atria Bay Spring Village
Barrington
RI

2,000

33,400

2,613

2,080

35,933

38,013

9,137

28,876

2000
2011
35 years
Atria Harborhill
East Greenwich
RI

2,089

21,702

1,519

2,179

23,131

25,310

5,562

19,748

1835
2011
35 years
Atria Lincoln Place
Lincoln
RI

1,440

12,686

1,027

1,475

13,678

15,153

3,755

11,398

2000
2011
35 years
Atria Aquidneck Place
Portsmouth
RI

2,810

31,623

865

2,814

32,484

35,298

7,007

28,291

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Forest Lake
Columbia
SC

670

13,946

837

684

14,769

15,453

3,451

12,002

1999
2011
35 years
Primrose Chateau
Saskatoon
SK

2,611

32,729

(1,634
)
2,484

31,222

33,706

3,885

29,821

1996
2014
35 years
Mulberry Estates
Moose Jaw
SK

2,173

31,791

(1,381
)
2,103

30,480

32,583

3,829

28,754

2003
2014
35 years
Queen Victoria Estates
Regina
SK

3,018

34,109

(1,596
)
2,789

32,742

35,531

4,019

31,512

2000
2014
35 years
Atria Weston Place
Knoxville
TN
9,158

793

7,961

1,113

967

8,900

9,867

2,482

7,385

1993
2011
35 years
Atria at the Arboretum
Austin
TX

8,280

61,764

923

8,342

62,625

70,967

11,628

59,339

2009
2012
35 years
Atria Carrollton
Carrollton
TX
6,259

360

20,465

1,270

370

21,725

22,095

5,247

16,848

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Grapevine
Grapevine
TX

2,070

23,104

789

2,080

23,883

25,963

5,523

20,440

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Westchase
Houston
TX

2,318

22,278

1,075

2,322

23,349

25,671

5,578

20,093

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Cinco Ranch
Katy
TX

3,171

73,287

967

3,176

74,249

77,425

6,972

70,453

2010
2015
35 years
Atria Kingwood
Kingwood
TX

1,170

4,518

697

1,192

5,193

6,385

1,644

4,741

1998
2011
35 years
Atria at Hometown
North Richland Hills
TX

1,932

30,382

1,294

1,963

31,645

33,608

5,945

27,663

2007
2013
35 years
Atria Canyon Creek
Plano
TX

3,110

45,999

1,360

3,148

47,321

50,469

8,528

41,941

2009
2013
35 years
Atria Richardson
Richardson
TX

1,590

23,662

1,178

1,600

24,830

26,430

5,570

20,860

1998
2011
35 years
Atria Cypresswood
Spring
TX

880

9,192

(2,884
)
897

6,291

7,188

2,466

4,722

1996
2011
35 years

156


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria Sugar Land
Sugar Land
TX

970

17,542

885

980

18,417

19,397

4,338

15,059

1999
2011
35 years
Atria Copeland
Tyler
TX

1,879

17,901

874

1,888

18,766

20,654

4,613

16,041

1997
2011
35 years
Atria Willow Park
Tyler
TX

920

31,271

1,169

982

32,378

33,360

7,815

25,545

1985
2011
35 years
Atria Virginia Beach
Virginia Beach
VA

1,749

33,004

710

1,754

33,709

35,463

7,919

27,544

1998
2011
35 years
Amberwood
Port Richey
FL

1,320



1,320


1,320


1,320

N/A
2011
N/A
Atria Development & Construction Fees
 
 


428



428

428


428

CIP
CIP
CIP
TOTAL FOR ATRIA SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES
 
 
442,048

548,972

5,010,620

387,770

558,443

5,388,919

5,947,362

1,111,490

4,835,872

 
 
 
OTHER SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Elmcroft of Grayson Valley
Birmingham
AL

1,040

19,145

495

1,046

19,634

20,680

4,174

16,506

2000
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Byrd Springs
Hunstville
AL

1,720

11,270

468

1,723

11,735

13,458

2,733

10,725

1999
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Heritage Woods
Mobile
AL

1,020

10,241

489

1,020

10,730

11,750

2,526

9,224

2000
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Halcyon
Montgomery
AL

220

5,476

16

220

5,492

5,712

1,748

3,964

1999
2006
35 years
Rosewood Manor
Scottsboro
AL

680

4,038


680

4,038

4,718

847

3,871

1998
2011
35 years
West Shores
Hot Springs
AR

1,326

10,904

1,200

1,326

12,104

13,430

3,928

9,502

1988
2005
35 years
Elmcroft of Maumelle
Maumelle
AR

1,252

7,601

22

1,252

7,623

8,875

2,426

6,449

1997
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Mountain Home
Mountain Home
AR

204

8,971

5

204

8,976

9,180

2,863

6,317

1997
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Sherwood
Sherwood
AR

1,320

5,693

24

1,320

5,717

7,037

1,817

5,220

1997
2006
35 years
Chandler Memory Care Community
Chandler
AZ

2,910

8,882

184

3,094

8,882

11,976

1,891

10,085

2012
2012
35 years
Silver Creek Inn Memory Care Community
Gilbert
AZ

890

5,918


890

5,918

6,808

1,150

5,658

2012
2012
35 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Green Valley
Green Valley
AZ

1,227

13,977


1,227

13,977

15,204

1,442

13,762

1998
2014
35 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Lake Havasu City
Lake Havasu
AZ

594

14,792


594

14,792

15,386

1,517

13,869

1999
2014
35 years
Lakeview Terrace
Lake Havasu City
AZ

706

7,810

96

706

7,906

8,612

840

7,772

2009
2015
35 years
Arbor Rose
Mesa
AZ

1,100

11,880

2,434

1,100

14,314

15,414

4,176

11,238

1999
2011
35 years
The Stratford
Phoenix
AZ

1,931

33,576


1,931

33,576

35,507

3,453

32,054

2001
2014
35 years
Amber Creek Inn Memory Care
Scottsdale
AZ

2,310

6,322

677

2,185

7,124

9,309

528

8,781

1986
2011
35 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Sierra Vista
Sierra Vista
AZ

295

13,224


295

13,224

13,519

1,353

12,166

1999
2014
35 years
The Woodmark at Sun City
Sun City
AZ

964

35,093

531

1,003

35,585

36,588

3,329

33,259

2000
2015
35 years
Rock Creek Memory Care Community
Surprise
AZ
10,228

826

16,353


826

16,353

17,179

45

17,134

2017
2017
35 years
Elmcroft of Tempe
Tempe
AZ

1,090

12,942

855

1,090

13,797

14,887

3,143

11,744

1999
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of River Centre
Tucson
AZ

1,940

5,195

462

1,940

5,657

7,597

1,531

6,066

1999
2011
35 years
Sierra Ridge Memory Care
Auburn
CA

681

6,071


681

6,071

6,752

643

6,109

2011
2014
35 years
Careage Banning
Banning
CA

2,970

16,037


2,970

16,037

19,007

3,567

15,440

2004
2011
35 years
Las Villas Del Carlsbad
Carlsbad
CA

1,760

30,469

3

1,760

30,472

32,232

9,721

22,511

1987
2006
35 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Chico
Chico
CA

1,069

14,929


1,069

14,929

15,998

1,537

14,461

1998
2014
35 years

157


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Villa Bonita
Chula Vista
CA

1,610

9,169


1,610

9,169

10,779

2,137

8,642

1989
2011
35 years
The Meadows Senior Living
Elk Grove
CA

1,308

19,667


1,308

19,667

20,975

2,047

18,928

2003
2014
35 years
Las Villas Del Norte
Escondido
CA

2,791

32,632

17

2,791

32,649

35,440

10,412

25,028

1986
2006
35 years
Alder Bay Assisted Living
Eureka
CA

1,170

5,228

(70
)
1,170

5,158

6,328

1,215

5,113

1997
2011
35 years
Cedarbrook
Fresno
CA

1,652

12,613


1,652

12,613

14,265

353

13,912

2014
2017
35 years
Elmcroft of La Mesa
La Mesa
CA

2,431

6,101


2,431

6,101

8,532

1,946

6,586

1997
2006
35 years
Grossmont Gardens
La Mesa
CA

9,104

59,349

71

9,104

59,420

68,524

18,939

49,585

1964
2006
35 years
Palms, The
La Mirada
CA

2,700

43,919


2,700

43,919

46,619

6,243

40,376

1990
2013
35 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Lancaster
Lancaster
CA

718

10,459


718

10,459

11,177

1,077

10,100

1999
2014
35 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Marysville
Marysville
CA

741

7,467


741

7,467

8,208

772

7,436

1999
2014
35 years
Mountview Retirement Residence
Montrose
CA

1,089

15,449

77

1,089

15,526

16,615

4,933

11,682

1974
2006
35 years
Redwood Retirement
Napa
CA

2,798

12,639


2,798

12,639

15,437

1,836

13,601

1986
2013
35 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Oroville
Oroville
CA

638

8,079


638

8,079

8,717

833

7,884

1999
2014
35 years
Valencia Commons
Rancho Cucamonga
CA

1,439

36,363


1,439

36,363

37,802

5,154

32,648

2002
2013
35 years
Mission Hills
Rancho Mirage
CA

6,800

3,637


6,800

3,637

10,437

1,297

9,140

1999
2011
35 years
Shasta Estates
Redding
CA

1,180

23,463


1,180

23,463

24,643

3,330

21,313

2009
2013
35 years
The Vistas
Redding
CA

1,290

22,033


1,290

22,033

23,323

4,555

18,768

2007
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Point Loma
San Diego
CA

2,117

6,865


2,117

6,865

8,982

2,190

6,792

1999
2006
35 years
Regency of Evergreen Valley
San Jose
CA

2,700

7,994


2,700

7,994

10,694

2,222

8,472

1998
2011
35 years
Villa del Obispo
San Juan Capistrano
CA

2,660

9,560

331

2,660

9,891

12,551

2,140

10,411

1985
2011
35 years
Villa Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara
CA

1,219

12,426

3,645

1,219

16,071

17,290

4,468

12,822

1977
2005
35 years
Skyline Place Senior Living
Sonora
CA

1,815

28,472


1,815

28,472

30,287

2,977

27,310

1996
2014
35 years
Oak Terrace Memory Care
Soulsbyville
CA

1,146

5,275


1,146

5,275

6,421

568

5,853

1999
2014
35 years
Eagle Lake Village
Susanville
CA

1,165

6,719


1,165

6,719

7,884

1,199

6,685

2006
2012
35 years
Bonaventure, The
Ventura
CA

5,294

32,747


5,294

32,747

38,041

4,719

33,322

2005
2013
35 years
Sterling Inn
Victorville
CA
12,558

733

18,539


733

18,539

19,272

499

18,773

1992
2017
35 years
Sterling Commons
Victorville
CA
5,850

768

13,124


768

13,124

13,892

355

13,537

1994
2017
35 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Visalia
Visalia
CA

1,300

8,378


1,300

8,378

9,678

873

8,805

1998
2014
35 years
Vista Village
Vista
CA

1,630

5,640

61

1,630

5,701

7,331

1,454

5,877

1980
2011
35 years
Rancho Vista
Vista
CA

6,730

21,828

42

6,730

21,870

28,600

6,966

21,634

1982
2006
35 years
Westminster Terrace
Westminster
CA

1,700

11,514

22

1,700

11,536

13,236

2,397

10,839

2001
2011
35 years
Highland Trail
Broomfield
CO

2,511

26,431


2,511

26,431

28,942

3,774

25,168

2009
2013
35 years
Caley Ridge
Englewood
CO

1,157

13,133


1,157

13,133

14,290

2,343

11,947

1999
2012
35 years
Garden Square at Westlake
Greeley
CO

630

8,211


630

8,211

8,841

1,775

7,066

1998
2011
35 years
Garden Square of Greeley
Greeley
CO

330

2,735


330

2,735

3,065

606

2,459

1995
2011
35 years
Lakewood Estates
Lakewood
CO

1,306

21,137


1,306

21,137

22,443

3,005

19,438

1988
2013
35 years
Sugar Valley Estates
Loveland
CO

1,255

21,837


1,255

21,837

23,092

3,103

19,989

2009
2013
35 years
Devonshire Acres
Sterling
CO

950

13,569

(2,922
)
965

10,632

11,597

2,330

9,267

1979
2011
35 years

158


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
The Hearth at Gardenside
Branford
CT

7,000

31,518


7,000

31,518

38,518

6,517

32,001

1999
2011
35 years
The Hearth at Tuxis Pond
Madison
CT

1,610

44,322


1,610

44,322

45,932

8,768

37,164

2002
2011
35 years
White Oaks
Manchester
CT

2,584

34,507


2,584

34,507

37,091

4,914

32,177

2007
2013
35 years
Willows Care Home
Romford
UK

4,695

6,983

(970
)
4,305

6,403

10,708

633

10,075

1986
2015
40 years
Cedars Care Home
Southend-on-Sea
UK

2,649

4,925

(628
)
2,429

4,517

6,946

460

6,486

2014
2015
40 years
Hampton Manor Belleview
Belleview
FL

390

8,337


390

8,337

8,727

1,781

6,946

1988
2011
35 years
Sabal House
Cantonment
FL

430

5,902


430

5,902

6,332

1,236

5,096

1999
2011
35 years
Bristol Park of Coral Springs
Coral Springs
FL

3,280

11,877

689

3,280

12,566

15,846

2,613

13,233

1999
2011
35 years
Stanley House
Defuniak Springs
FL

410

5,659


410

5,659

6,069

1,184

4,885

1999
2011
35 years
The Peninsula
Hollywood
FL

3,660

9,122

1,307

3,660

10,429

14,089

2,277

11,812

1972
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Timberlin Parc
Jacksonville
FL

455

5,905

5

455

5,910

6,365

1,884

4,481

1998
2006
35 years
Forsyth House
Milton
FL

610

6,503


610

6,503

7,113

1,348

5,765

1999
2011
35 years
Princeton Village of Largo
Largo
FL

1,718

10,438

153

1,718

10,591

12,309

1,344

10,965

1992
2015
35 years
Barrington Terrace of Ft. Myers
Fort Myers
FL

2,105

18,190

615

2,110

18,800

20,910

2,167

18,743

2001
2015
35 years
Barrington Terrace of Naples
Naples
FL

2,596

18,716

571

2,608

19,275

21,883

2,188

19,695

2004
2015
35 years
The Carlisle Naples
Naples
FL

8,406

78,091


8,406

78,091

86,497

15,720

70,777

1998
2011
35 years
Naples ALZ Development
Naples
FL

2,983



2,983


2,983


2,983

CIP
CIP
CIP
Hampton Manor at 24th Road
Ocala
FL

690

8,767


690

8,767

9,457

1,815

7,642

1996
2011
35 years
Hampton Manor at Deerwood
Ocala
FL

790

5,605

3,648

983

9,060

10,043

1,499

8,544

2005
2011
35 years
Las Palmas
Palm Coast
FL

984

30,009


984

30,009

30,993

4,249

26,744

2009
2013
35 years
Princeton Village of Palm Coast
Palm Coast
FL

1,958

24,525

42

1,958

24,567

26,525

2,578

23,947

2007
2015
35 years
Outlook Pointe at Pensacola
Pensacola
FL

2,230

2,362

154

2,230

2,516

4,746

790

3,956

1999
2011
35 years
Magnolia House
Quincy
FL

400

5,190


400

5,190

5,590

1,104

4,486

1999
2011
35 years
Outlook Pointe at Tallahassee
Tallahassee
FL

2,430

17,745

460

2,430

18,205

20,635

3,871

16,764

1999
2011
35 years
Magnolia Place
Tallahassee
FL

640

8,013

81

640

8,094

8,734

1,627

7,107

1999
2011
35 years
Bristol Park of Tamarac
Tamarac
FL

3,920

14,130

718

3,920

14,848

18,768

3,023

15,745

2000
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Carrolwood
Tampa
FL

5,410

20,944

634

5,410

21,578

26,988

4,692

22,296

2001
2011
35 years
Arbor Terrace of Athens
Athens
GA

1,767

16,442

439

1,770

16,878

18,648

1,759

16,889

1998
2015
35 years
Arbor Terrace at Cascade
Atlanta
GA

3,052

9,040

662

3,057

9,697

12,754

1,440

11,314

1999
2015
35 years
Augusta Gardens
Augusta
GA

530

10,262

308

543

10,557

11,100

2,239

8,861

1997
2011
35 years
Benton House of Covington
Covington
GA
7,594

1,297

11,397

142

1,297

11,539

12,836

1,271

11,565

2009
2015
35 years
Arbor Terrace of Decatur
Decatur
GA

3,102

19,599

(1,371
)
1,292

20,038

21,330

2,053

19,277

1990
2015
35 years
Benton House of Douglasville
Douglasville
GA

1,697

15,542

78

1,697

15,620

17,317

1,673

15,644

2010
2015
35 years
Elmcroft of Martinez
Martinez
GA

408

6,764

5

408

6,769

7,177

2,029

5,148

1997
2007
35 years
Benton House of Newnan
Newnan
GA

1,474

17,487

157

1,474

17,644

19,118

1,839

17,279

2010
2015
35 years
Elmcroft of Roswell
Roswell
GA

1,867

15,835

24

1,867

15,859

17,726

1,595

16,131

1997
2014
35 years
Benton Village of Stockbridge
Stockbridge
GA

2,221

21,989

456

2,227

22,439

24,666

2,411

22,255

2008
2015
35 years
Benton House of Sugar Hill
Sugar Hill
GA

2,173

14,937

101

2,173

15,038

17,211

1,698

15,513

2010
2015
35 years
Mayflower Care Home
Northfleet
UK

4,330

7,519

(983
)
3,971

6,895

10,866

695

10,171

2012
2015
40 years

159


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Villas of St. James - Breese, IL
Breese
IL

671

6,849


671

6,849

7,520

852

6,668

2009
2015
35 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Chatham, IL
Chatham
IL

1,185

8,910


1,185

8,910

10,095

1,140

8,955

2012
2015
35 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Effingham, IL
Effingham
IL

508

6,624


508

6,624

7,132

801

6,331

2011
2015
35 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Herrin, IL
Herrin
IL

2,175

9,605


2,175

9,605

11,780

1,416

10,364

2012
2015
35 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Marshall, IL
Marshall
IL

1,461

4,881


1,461

4,881

6,342

837

5,505

2012
2015
35 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Newton, IL
Newton
IL

458

4,590


458

4,590

5,048

616

4,432

2011
2015
35 years
Rochester Senior Living at Wyndcrest
Rochester
IL

570

6,536

108

570

6,644

7,214

767

6,447

2005
2015
35 years
Villas of Holly Brook, Shelbyville, IL
Shelbyville
IL

2,292

3,351


2,292

3,351

5,643

921

4,722

2011
2015
35 years
Elmcroft of Muncie
Muncie
IN

244

11,218

4

244

11,222

11,466

3,366

8,100

1998
2007
35 years
Wood Ridge
South Bend
IN

590

4,850

(35
)
590

4,815

5,405

1,059

4,346

1990
2011
35 years
Maples Care Home
Bexleyheath
UK

5,042

7,525

(1,043
)
4,624

6,900

11,524

689

10,835

2007
2015
40 years
Barty House Nursing Home
Maidstone
UK

3,769

3,089

(569
)
3,456

2,833

6,289

407

5,882

2013
2015
40 years
Tunbridge Wells Care Centre
Tunbridge Wells
UK

4,323

5,869

(846
)
3,964

5,382

9,346

593

8,753

2010
2015
40 years
Elmcroft of Florence (KY)
Florence
KY

1,535

21,826

10

1,535

21,836

23,371

2,182

21,189

2010
2014
35 years
Hartland Hills
Lexington
KY

1,468

23,929


1,468

23,929

25,397

3,401

21,996

2001
2013
35 years
Elmcroft of Mount Washington
Mount Washington
KY

758

12,048

8

758

12,056

12,814

1,204

11,610

2005
2014
35 years
Heathlands Care Home
Chingford
UK

5,398

7,967

(1,109
)
4,950

7,306

12,256

744

11,512

1980
2015
40 years
Heritage Woods
Agawam
MA

1,249

4,625


1,249

4,625

5,874

2,404

3,470

1997
2004
30 years
Devonshire Estates
Lenox
MA

1,832

31,124


1,832

31,124

32,956

4,423

28,533

1998
2013
35 years
Outlook Pointe at Hagerstown
Hagerstown
MD

2,010

1,293

273

2,010

1,566

3,576

539

3,037

1999
2011
35 years
Clover Healthcare
Auburn
ME

1,400

26,895

876

1,400

27,771

29,171

6,014

23,157

1982
2011
35 years
Gorham House
Gorham
ME

1,360

33,147

1,472

1,527

34,452

35,979

6,825

29,154

1990
2011
35 years
Kittery Estates
Kittery
ME

1,531

30,811


1,531

30,811

32,342

4,373

27,969

2009
2013
35 years
Woods at Canco
Portland
ME

1,441

45,578


1,441

45,578

47,019

6,452

40,567

2000
2013
35 years
Sentry Inn at York Harbor
York Harbor
ME

3,490

19,869


3,490

19,869

23,359

4,061

19,298

2000
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Downriver
Brownstown Charter Township
MI

320

32,652

437

371

33,038

33,409

6,667

26,742

2000
2011
35 years
Independence Village of East Lansing
East Lansing
MI

1,956

18,122

398

1,956

18,520

20,476

3,128

17,348

1989
2012
35 years
Elmcroft of Kentwood
Kentwood
MI

510

13,976

(3,503
)
481

10,502

10,983

3,361

7,622

2001
2011
35 years
Primrose Austin
Austin
MN

2,540

11,707

443

2,540

12,150

14,690

2,369

12,321

2002
2011
35 years
Primrose Duluth
Duluth
MN

6,190

8,296

257

6,245

8,498

14,743

1,902

12,841

2003
2011
35 years
Primrose Mankato
Mankato
MN

1,860

8,920

352

1,860

9,272

11,132

1,978

9,154

1999
2011
35 years
Lodge at White Bear
White Bear Lake
MN

732

24,999


732

24,999

25,731

3,538

22,193

2002
2013
35 years
Assisted Living at the Meadowlands - O'Fallon, MO
O'Fallon
MO

2,326

14,158


2,326

14,158

16,484

1,760

14,724

1999
2015
35 years
Canyon Creek Inn Memory Care
Billings
MT

420

11,217

7

420

11,224

11,644

2,212

9,432

2011
2011
35 years
Spring Creek Inn Alzheimer's Community
Bozeman
MT

1,345

16,877


1,345

16,877

18,222

470

17,752

2010
2017
35 years
The Springs at Missoula
Missoula
MT
16,500

1,975

34,390

1,375

1,975

35,765

37,740

6,046

31,694

2004
2012
35 years
Carillon ALF of Asheboro
Asheboro
NC

680

15,370


680

15,370

16,050

3,109

12,941

1998
2011
35 years
Arbor Terrace of Asheville
Asheville
NC

1,365

15,679

532

1,365

16,211

17,576

1,753

15,823

1998
2015
35 years

160


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Elmcroft of Little Avenue
Charlotte
NC

250

5,077

7

250

5,084

5,334

1,620

3,714

1997
2006
35 years
Carillon ALF of Cramer Mountain
Cramerton
NC

530

18,225


530

18,225

18,755

3,710

15,045

1999
2011
35 years
Carillon ALF of Harrisburg
Harrisburg
NC

1,660

15,130


1,660

15,130

16,790

3,070

13,720

1997
2011
35 years
Carillon ALF of Hendersonville
Hendersonville
NC

2,210

7,372


2,210

7,372

9,582

1,669

7,913

2005
2011
35 years
Carillon ALF of Hillsborough
Hillsborough
NC

1,450

19,754


1,450

19,754

21,204

3,962

17,242

2005
2011
35 years
Willow Grove
Matthews
NC

763

27,544


763

27,544

28,307

3,897

24,410

2009
2013
35 years
Carillon ALF of Newton
Newton
NC

540

14,935


540

14,935

15,475

3,021

12,454

2000
2011
35 years
Independence Village of Olde Raleigh
Raleigh
NC

1,989

18,648


1,989

18,648

20,637

3,201

17,436

1991
2012
35 years
Elmcroft of Northridge
Raleigh
NC

184

3,592

16

184

3,608

3,792

1,147

2,645

1984
2006
35 years
Carillon ALF of Salisbury
Salisbury
NC

1,580

25,026


1,580

25,026

26,606

4,973

21,633

1999
2011
35 years
Carillon ALF of Shelby
Shelby
NC

660

15,471


660

15,471

16,131

3,140

12,991

2000
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Southern Pines
Southern Pines
NC

1,196

10,766

14

1,196

10,780

11,976

2,385

9,591

1998
2010
35 years
Carillon ALF of Southport
Southport
NC

1,330

10,356


1,330

10,356

11,686

2,223

9,463

2005
2011
35 years
Primrose Bismarck
Bismarck
ND

1,210

9,768

255

1,210

10,023

11,233

2,041

9,192

1994
2011
35 years
Wellington ALF - Minot ND
Minot
ND

3,241

9,509


3,241

9,509

12,750

1,462

11,288

2005
2015
35 years
Crown Pointe
Omaha
NE

1,316

11,950

1,700

1,316

13,650

14,966

4,318

10,648

1985
2005
35 years
Birch Heights
Derry
NH

1,413

30,267


1,413

30,267

31,680

4,294

27,386

2009
2013
35 years
Bear Canyon Estates
Albuquerque
NM

1,879

36,223


1,879

36,223

38,102

5,142

32,960

1997
2013
35 years
The Woodmark at Uptown
Albuquerque
NM

2,439

33,276

451

2,451

33,715

36,166

3,404

32,762

2000
2015
35 years
Elmcroft of Quintessence
Albuquerque
NM

1,150

26,527

426

1,165

26,938

28,103

5,483

22,620

1998
2011
35 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Mira Loma
Henderson
NV

1,279

12,558


1,279

12,558

13,837

739

13,098

1998
2016
35 years
The Amberleigh
Buffalo
NY

3,498

19,097

5,836

3,498

24,933

28,431

7,058

21,373

1988
2005
35 years
The Hearth at Castle Gardens
Vestal
NY

1,830

20,312

2,230

1,885

22,487

24,372

5,685

18,687

1994
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Lima
Lima
OH

490

3,368

11

490

3,379

3,869

1,075

2,794

1998
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Ontario
Mansfield
OH

523

7,968

12

523

7,980

8,503

2,543

5,960

1998
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Medina
Medina
OH

661

9,788

7

661

9,795

10,456

3,123

7,333

1999
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Washington Township
Miamisburg
OH

1,235

12,611

6

1,235

12,617

13,852

4,024

9,828

1998
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Sagamore Hills
Sagamore Hills
OH

980

12,604

29

980

12,633

13,613

4,023

9,590

2000
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Lorain
Vermilion
OH

500

15,461

532

557

15,936

16,493

3,562

12,931

2000
2011
35 years
Gardens at Westlake Senior Living
Westlake
OH

2,401

20,640

128

2,401

20,768

23,169

2,352

20,817

1987
2015
35 years
Elmcroft of Xenia
Xenia
OH

653

2,801

1

653

2,802

3,455

894

2,561

1999
2006
35 years
Arbor House of Mustang
Mustang
OK

372

3,587


372

3,587

3,959

600

3,359

1999
2012
35 years
Arbor House of Norman
Norman
OK

444

7,525


444

7,525

7,969

1,252

6,717

2000
2012
35 years
Arbor House Reminisce Center
Norman
OK

438

3,028


438

3,028

3,466

509

2,957

2004
2012
35 years
Arbor House of Midwest City
Oklahoma City
OK

544

9,133


544

9,133

9,677

1,519

8,158

2004
2012
35 years
Mansion at Waterford
Oklahoma City
OK

2,077

14,184


2,077

14,184

16,261

2,531

13,730

1999
2012
35 years
Meadowbrook Place
Baker City
OR

1,430

5,311


1,430

5,311

6,741

566

6,175

1965
2014
35 years
Edgewood Downs
Beaverton
OR

2,356

15,476


2,356

15,476

17,832

2,227

15,605

1978
2013
35 years
Princeton Village Assisted Living
Clackamas
OR
2,691

1,126

10,283

56

1,126

10,339

11,465

1,137

10,328

1999
2015
35 years

161


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Bayside Terrace Assisted Living
Coos Bay
OR

498

2,795

423

498

3,218

3,716

317

3,399

2006
2015
35 years
Ocean Ridge Assisted Living
Coos Bay
OR

2,681

10,941

(94
)
2,681

10,847

13,528

1,414

12,114

2006
2015
35 years
Avamere at Hillsboro
Hillsboro
OR

4,400

8,353

1,209

4,400

9,562

13,962

2,232

11,730

2000
2011
35 years
The Springs at Tanasbourne
Hillsboro
OR
33,282

4,689

55,035


4,689

55,035

59,724

9,933

49,791

2009
2013
35 years
The Arbor at Avamere Court
Keizer
OR

922

6,460

108

1,135

6,355

7,490

808

6,682

2012
2014
35 years
Pelican Pointe
Klamath Falls
OR
11,614

943

26,237

113

943

26,350

27,293

2,691

24,602

2011
2015
35 years
The Stafford
Lake Oswego
OR

1,800

16,122

644

1,806

16,760

18,566

3,542

15,024

2008
2011
35 years
The Springs at Clackamas Woods
Milwaukie
OR
14,755

1,264

22,429


1,264

22,429

23,693

3,944

19,749

1999
2012
35 years
Clackamas Woods Assisted Living
Milwaukie
OR
7,945

681

12,077


681

12,077

12,758

2,123

10,635

1999
2012
35 years
Pheasant Pointe Assisted Living
Molalla
OR

904

7,433

(107
)
904

7,326

8,230

701

7,529

1998
2015
35 years
Avamere at Newberg
Newberg
OR

1,320

4,664

588

1,342

5,230

6,572

1,323

5,249

1999
2011
35 years
Avamere Living at Berry Park
Oregon City
OR

1,910

4,249

2,298

1,910

6,547

8,457

1,666

6,791

1972
2011
35 years
McLoughlin Place Senior Living
Oregon City
OR

2,418

26,819


2,418

26,819

29,237

2,822

26,415

1997
2014
35 years
Avamere at Bethany
Portland
OR

3,150

16,740

227

3,150

16,967

20,117

3,605

16,512

2002
2011
35 years
Cedar Village Assisted Living
Salem
OR

868

12,652


868

12,652

13,520

1,115

12,405

1999
2015
35 years
Redwood Heights Assisted Living
Salem
OR

1,513

16,774

(175
)
1,513

16,599

18,112

1,513

16,599

1999
2015
35 years
Avamere at Sandy
Sandy
OR

1,000

7,309

276

1,000

7,585

8,585

1,760

6,825

1999
2011
35 years
Suzanne Elise ALF
Seaside
OR

1,940

4,027

66

1,940

4,093

6,033

1,160

4,873

1998
2011
35 years
Necanicum Village
Seaside
OR

2,212

7,311

52

2,212

7,363

9,575

767

8,808

2001
2015
35 years
Avamere at Sherwood
Sherwood
OR

1,010

7,051

259

1,010

7,310

8,320

1,707

6,613

2000
2011
35 years
Chateau Gardens
Springfield
OR

1,550

4,197


1,550

4,197

5,747

875

4,872

1991
2011
35 years
Avamere at St Helens
St. Helens
OR

1,410

10,496

488

1,410

10,984

12,394

2,428

9,966

2000
2011
35 years
Flagstone Senior Living
The Dalles
OR

1,631

17,786


1,631

17,786

19,417

1,867

17,550

1991
2014
35 years
Elmcroft of Allison Park
Allison Park
PA

1,171

5,686

8

1,171

5,694

6,865

1,814

5,051

1986
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Chippewa
Beaver Falls
PA

1,394

8,586

5

1,394

8,591

9,985

2,740

7,245

1998
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Berwick
Berwick
PA

111

6,741

4

111

6,745

6,856

2,151

4,705

1998
2006
35 years
Outlook Pointe at Lakemont
Bridgeville
PA

1,660

12,624

205

1,660

12,829

14,489

2,787

11,702

1999
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Dillsburg
Dillsburg
PA

432

7,797


432

7,797

8,229

2,488

5,741

1998
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Altoona
Duncansville
PA

331

4,729

4

331

4,733

5,064

1,509

3,555

1997
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Lebanon
Lebanon
PA

240

7,336

4

240

7,340

7,580

2,341

5,239

1999
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Lewisburg
Lewisburg
PA

232

5,666


232

5,666

5,898

1,808

4,090

1999
2006
35 years
Lehigh Commons
Macungie
PA

420

4,406

450

420

4,856

5,276

2,504

2,772

1997
2004
30 years
Elmcroft of Loyalsock
Montoursville
PA

413

3,412


413

3,412

3,825

1,089

2,736

1999
2006
35 years
Highgate at Paoli Pointe
Paoli
PA

1,151

9,079


1,151

9,079

10,230

4,344

5,886

1997
2004
30 years
Elmcroft of Mid Valley
Peckville
PA

619

11,662

3

619

11,665

12,284

1,163

11,121

1998
2014
35 years
Sanatoga Court
Pottstown
PA

360

3,233


360

3,233

3,593

1,604

1,989

1997
2004
30 years
Berkshire Commons
Reading
PA

470

4,301


470

4,301

4,771

2,132

2,639

1997
2004
30 years
Mifflin Court
Reading
PA

689

4,265

351

689

4,616

5,305

2,048

3,257

1997
2004
35 years
Elmcroft of Reading
Reading
PA

638

4,942

3

638

4,945

5,583

1,577

4,006

1998
2006
35 years

162


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Elmcroft of Reedsville
Reedsville
PA

189

5,170

8

189

5,178

5,367

1,650

3,717

1998
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Saxonburg
Saxonburg
PA

770

5,949

17

770

5,966

6,736

1,899

4,837

1994
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Shippensburg
Shippensburg
PA

203

7,634


203

7,634

7,837

2,436

5,401

1999
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of State College
State College
PA

320

7,407

6

320

7,413

7,733

2,364

5,369

1997
2006
35 years
Outlook Pointe at York
York
PA

1,260

6,923

216

1,260

7,139

8,399

1,523

6,876

1999
2011
35 years
The Garden House
Anderson
SC
7,566

969

15,613

85

969

15,698

16,667

1,705

14,962

2000
2015
35 years
Forest Pines
Columbia
SC

1,058

27,471


1,058

27,471

28,529

3,893

24,636

1998
2013
35 years
Elmcroft of Florence SC
Florence
SC

108

7,620

230

108

7,850

7,958

2,441

5,517

1998
2006
35 years
Primrose Aberdeen
Aberdeen
SD

850

659

235

850

894

1,744

339

1,405

1991
2011
35 years
Primrose Place
Aberdeen
SD

310

3,242

53

310

3,295

3,605

701

2,904

2000
2011
35 years
Primrose Rapid City
Rapid City
SD

860

8,722

88

860

8,810

9,670

1,880

7,790

1997
2011
35 years
Primrose Sioux Falls
Sioux Falls
SD

2,180

12,936

315

2,180

13,251

15,431

2,848

12,583

2002
2011
35 years
Ashridge Court
Bexhill-on-Sea
UK

2,274

4,791

(587
)
2,085

4,393

6,478

506

5,972

2010
2015
40 years
Inglewood Nursing Home
Eastbourne
UK

1,908

3,021

(409
)
1,750

2,770

4,520

368

4,152

2010
2015
40 years
Pentlow Nursing Home
Eastbourne
UK

1,964

2,462

(367
)
1,801

2,258

4,059

318

3,741

2007
2015
40 years
Outlook Pointe of Bristol
Bristol
TN

470

16,006

315

470

16,321

16,791

3,222

13,569

1999
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Hamilton Place
Chattanooga
TN

87

4,248

9

87

4,257

4,344

1,356

2,988

1998
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Shallowford
Chattanooga
TN

580

7,568

523

582

8,089

8,671

2,047

6,624

1999
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Hendersonville
Hendersonville
TN

600

5,304

52

600

5,356

5,956

536

5,420

1999
2014
35 years
Regency House
Hixson
TN

140

6,611


140

6,611

6,751

1,379

5,372

2000
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Jackson
Jackson
TN

768

16,840

8

768

16,848

17,616

1,679

15,937

1998
2014
35 years
Outlook Pointe at Johnson City
Johnson City
TN

590

10,043

400

590

10,443

11,033

2,075

8,958

1999
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Kingsport
Kingsport
TN

22

7,815

7

22

7,822

7,844

2,494

5,350

2000
2006
35 years
Arbor Terrace of Knoxville
Knoxville
TN

590

15,862

533

590

16,395

16,985

1,778

15,207

1997
2015
35 years
Elmcroft of Halls
Knoxville
TN

387

4,948

10

387

4,958

5,345

496

4,849

1998
2014
35 years
Elmcroft of West Knoxville
Knoxville
TN

439

10,697

26

439

10,723

11,162

3,414

7,748

2000
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Lebanon
Lebanon
TN

180

7,086

391

180

7,477

7,657

2,277

5,380

2000
2006
35 years
Elmcroft of Bartlett
Memphis
TN

570

25,552

377

570

25,929

26,499

5,302

21,197

1999
2011
35 years
Kennington Place
Memphis
TN

1,820

4,748

815

1,820

5,563

7,383

1,895

5,488

1989
2011
35 years
The Glenmary
Memphis
TN

510

5,860

477

510

6,337

6,847

1,692

5,155

1964
2011
35 years
Outlook Pointe at Murfreesboro
Murfreesboro
TN

940

8,030

316

940

8,346

9,286

1,724

7,562

1999
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Brentwood
Nashville
TN

960

22,020

654

960

22,674

23,634

4,862

18,772

1998
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Arlington
Arlington
TX

2,650

14,060

539

2,650

14,599

17,249

3,304

13,945

1998
2011
35 years
Meadowbrook ALZ
Arlington
TX

755

4,677

940

755

5,617

6,372

922

5,450

2012
2012
35 years
Elmcroft of Austin
Austin
TX

2,770

25,820

610

2,770

26,430

29,200

5,536

23,664

2000
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Bedford
Bedford
TX

770

19,691

699

770

20,390

21,160

4,351

16,809

1999
2011
35 years
Highland Estates
Cedar Park
TX

1,679

28,943


1,679

28,943

30,622

4,112

26,510

2009
2013
35 years
Elmcroft of Rivershire
Conroe
TX

860

32,671

714

860

33,385

34,245

6,892

27,353

1997
2011
35 years
Flower Mound
Flower Mound
TX

900

5,512


900

5,512

6,412

1,170

5,242

1995
2011
35 years

163


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Arbor House Granbury
Granbury
TX

390

8,186


390

8,186

8,576

1,359

7,217

2007
2012
35 years
Copperfield Estates
Houston
TX

1,216

21,135


1,216

21,135

22,351

3,003

19,348

2009
2013
35 years
Elmcroft of Braeswood
Houston
TX

3,970

15,919

646

3,970

16,565

20,535

3,707

16,828

1999
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Cy-Fair
Houston
TX

1,580

21,801

437

1,593

22,225

23,818

4,653

19,165

1998
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Irving
Irving
TX

1,620

18,755

469

1,620

19,224

20,844

4,119

16,725

1999
2011
35 years
Whitley Place
Keller
TX


5,100

773


5,873

5,873

1,452

4,421

1998
2008
35 years
Elmcroft of Lake Jackson
Lake Jackson
TX

710

14,765

443

710

15,208

15,918

3,316

12,602

1998
2011
35 years
Arbor House Lewisville
Lewisville
TX

824

10,308


824

10,308

11,132

1,719

9,413

2007
2012
35 years
Elmcroft of Vista Ridge
Lewisville
TX

6,280

10,548

(12,221
)
1,921

2,686

4,607

2,150

2,457

1998
2011
35 years
Polo Park Estates
Midland
TX

765

29,447


765

29,447

30,212

4,166

26,046

1996
2013
35 years
Arbor Hills Memory Care Community
Plano
TX

1,014

5,719


1,014

5,719

6,733

858

5,875

2013
2013
35 years
Arbor House of Rockwall
Rockwall
TX

1,537

12,883


1,537

12,883

14,420

2,160

12,260

2009
2012
35 years
Elmcroft of Windcrest
San Antonio
TX

920

13,011

586

920

13,597

14,517

3,113

11,404

1999
2011
35 years
Paradise Springs
Spring
TX

1,488

24,556


1,488

24,556

26,044

3,490

22,554

2008
2013
35 years
Arbor House of Temple
Temple
TX

473

6,750


473

6,750

7,223

1,124

6,099

2008
2012
35 years
Elmcroft of Cottonwood
Temple
TX

630

17,515

439

630

17,954

18,584

3,810

14,774

1997
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Mainland
Texas City
TX

520

14,849

547

520

15,396

15,916

3,355

12,561

1996
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Victoria
Victoria
TX

440

13,040

445

440

13,485

13,925

2,959

10,966

1997
2011
35 years
Arbor House of Weatherford
Weatherford
TX

233

3,347


233

3,347

3,580

557

3,023

1994
2012
35 years
Elmcroft of Wharton
Wharton
TX

320

13,799

674

320

14,473

14,793

3,254

11,539

1996
2011
35 years
Mountain Ridge
South Ogden
UT
11,218

1,243

24,659


1,243

24,659

25,902

2,516

23,386

2001
2014
35 years
Elmcroft of Chesterfield
Richmond
VA

829

6,534

8

829

6,542

7,371

2,085

5,286

1999
2006
35 years
Pheasant Ridge
Roanoke
VA

1,813

9,027


1,813

9,027

10,840

1,611

9,229

1999
2012
35 years
Cascade Valley Senior Living
Arlington
WA

1,413

6,294


1,413

6,294

7,707

651

7,056

1995
2014
35 years
The Bellingham at Orchard
Bellingham
WA

3,383

17,553

(81
)
3,381

17,474

20,855

1,516

19,339

1999
2015
35 years
Bay Pointe Retirement
Bremerton
WA

2,114

21,006

360

2,114

21,366

23,480

2,161

21,319

1999
2015
35 years
Cooks Hill Manor
Centralia
WA

520

6,144

35

520

6,179

6,699

1,385

5,314

1993
2011
35 years
Edmonds Landing
Edmonds
WA

4,273

27,852

(218
)
4,273

27,634

31,907

2,310

29,597

2001
2015
35 years
The Terrace at Beverly Lake
Everett
WA

1,515

12,520

(25
)
1,514

12,496

14,010

1,069

12,941

1998
2015
35 years
The Sequoia
Olympia
WA

1,490

13,724

108

1,490

13,832

15,322

2,931

12,391

1995
2011
35 years
Bishop Place Senior Living
Pullman
WA

1,780

33,608


1,780

33,608

35,388

3,415

31,973

1998
2014
35 years
Willow Gardens
Puyallup
WA

1,959

35,492


1,959

35,492

37,451

5,041

32,410

1996
2013
35 years
Birchview
Sedro-Woolley
WA

210

14,145

98

210

14,243

14,453

2,782

11,671

1996
2011
35 years
Discovery Memory care
Sequim
WA

320

10,544

132

320

10,676

10,996

2,171

8,825

1961
2011
35 years
The Village Retirement & Assisted Living
Tacoma
WA

2,200

5,938

637

2,200

6,575

8,775

1,618

7,157

1976
2011
35 years
Clearwater Springs
Vancouver
WA

1,269

9,840

193

1,269

10,033

11,302

1,188

10,114

2003
2015
35 years
Matthews of Appleton I
Appleton
WI

130

1,834

(41
)
130

1,793

1,923

411

1,512

1996
2011
35 years
Matthews of Appleton II
Appleton
WI

140

2,016

301

140

2,317

2,457

484

1,973

1997
2011
35 years

164


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Hunters Ridge
Beaver Dam
WI

260

2,380


260

2,380

2,640

522

2,118

1998
2011
35 years
Harbor House Beloit
Beloit
WI

150

4,356

427

191

4,742

4,933

916

4,017

1990
2011
35 years
Harbor House Clinton
Clinton
WI

290

4,390


290

4,390

4,680

889

3,791

1991
2011
35 years
Creekside
Cudahy
WI

760

1,693


760

1,693

2,453

401

2,052

2001
2011
35 years
Harbor House Eau Claire
Eau Claire
WI

210

6,259


210

6,259

6,469

1,242

5,227

1996
2011
35 years
Chapel Valley
Fitchburg
WI

450

2,372


450

2,372

2,822

527

2,295

1998
2011
35 years
Matthews of Milwaukee II
Fox Point
WI

1,810

943

37

1,820

970

2,790

310

2,480

1999
2011
35 years
Laurel Oaks
Glendale
WI

2,390

43,587

3,556

2,510

47,023

49,533

9,097

40,436

1988
2011
35 years
Layton Terrace
Greenfield
WI

3,490

39,201

382

3,480

39,593

43,073

8,084

34,989

1999
2011
35 years
Matthews of Hartland
Hartland
WI

640

1,663

43

652

1,694

2,346

467

1,879

1985
2011
35 years
Matthews of Horicon
Horicon
WI

340

3,327

(95
)
345

3,227

3,572

801

2,771

2002
2011
35 years
Jefferson
Jefferson
WI

330

2,384


330

2,384

2,714

523

2,191

1997
2011
35 years
Harbor House Kenosha
Kenosha
WI

710

3,254

3,641

1,156

6,449

7,605

1,031

6,574

1996
2011
35 years
Harbor House Manitowoc
Manitowoc
WI

140

1,520


140

1,520

1,660

324

1,336

1997
2011
35 years
Adare II
Menasha
WI

110

537

(493
)
94

60

154

154


1994
2011
35 years
Adare IV
Menasha
WI

110

537

(503
)
94

50

144

144


1994
2011
35 years
Adare III
Menasha
WI

90

557

(493
)
65

89

154

154


1993
2011
35 years
Adare I
Menasha
WI

90

557

(500
)
74

73

147

147


1993
2011
35 years
The Arboretum
Menomonee Falls
WI

5,640

49,083

1,813

5,640

50,896

56,536

10,640

45,896

1989
2011
35 years
Matthews of Milwaukee I
Milwaukee
WI

1,800

935

119

1,800

1,054

2,854

323

2,531

1999
2011
35 years
Hart Park Square
Milwaukee
WI

1,900

21,628

34

1,900

21,662

23,562

4,462

19,100

2005
2011
35 years
Harbor House Monroe
Monroe
WI

490

4,964


490

4,964

5,454

1,018

4,436

1990
2011
35 years
Matthews of Neenah I
Neenah
WI

710

1,157

64

713

1,218

1,931

342

1,589

2006
2011
35 years
Matthews of Neenah II
Neenah
WI

720

2,339

(50
)
720

2,289

3,009

583

2,426

2007
2011
35 years
Matthews of Irish Road
Neenah
WI

320

1,036

87

320

1,123

1,443

322

1,121

2001
2011
35 years
Matthews of Oak Creek
Oak Creek
WI

800

2,167

(2
)
812

2,153

2,965

515

2,450

1997
2011
35 years
Azura Memory Care of Oak Creek
Oak Creek
WI

727

6,254


727

6,254

6,981

120

6,861

2017
2017
35 years
Harbor House Oconomowoc
Oconomowoc
WI

400

1,596

4,674

709

5,961

6,670

497

6,173

2016
2015
35 years
Wilkinson Woods of Oconomowoc
Oconomowoc
WI

1,100

12,436

157

1,100

12,593

13,693

2,557

11,136

1992
2011
35 years
Harbor House Oshkosh
Oshkosh
WI

190

949


190

949

1,139

256

883

1993
2011
35 years
Matthews of Pewaukee
Pewaukee
WI

1,180

4,124

206

1,197

4,313

5,510

1,060

4,450

2001
2011
35 years
Harbor House Sheboygan
Sheboygan
WI

1,060

6,208


1,060

6,208

7,268

1,249

6,019

1995
2011
35 years
Matthews of St. Francis I
St. Francis
WI

1,370

1,428

(113
)
1,389

1,296

2,685

369

2,316

2000
2011
35 years
Matthews of St. Francis II
St. Francis
WI

1,370

1,666

15

1,377

1,674

3,051

428

2,623

2000
2011
35 years
Howard Village of St. Francis
St. Francis
WI

2,320

17,232


2,320

17,232

19,552

3,628

15,924

2001
2011
35 years
Harbor House Stoughton
Stoughton
WI

450

3,191


450

3,191

3,641

702

2,939

1992
2011
35 years
Oak Hill Terrace
Waukesha
WI

2,040

40,298

440

2,040

40,738

42,778

8,320

34,458

1985
2011
35 years
Harbor House Rib Mountain
Wausau
WI

350

3,413


350

3,413

3,763

707

3,056

1997
2011
35 years

165


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Library Square
West Allis
WI

1,160

23,714


1,160

23,714

24,874

4,868

20,006

1996
2011
35 years
Matthews of Wrightstown
Wrightstown
WI

140

376

12

140

388

528

148

380

1999
2011
35 years
Madison House
Kirkland
WA

4,291

26,787


4,291

26,787

31,078

755

30,323

1978
2017
35 years
Delaware Plaza
Longview
WA
4,189

620

5,116


620

5,116

5,736

142

5,594

1972
2017
35 years
Canterbury Gardens
Longview
WA
5,586

444

13,698


444

13,698

14,142

364

13,778

1998
2017
35 years
Canterbury Inn
Longview
WA
14,568

1,462

34,507


1,462

34,507

35,969

893

35,076

1989
2017
35 years
Canterbury Park
Longview
WA

969

30,109


969

30,109

31,078

834

30,244

2000
2017
35 years
Cascade Inn
Vancouver
WA
12,378

3,201

18,996


3,201

18,996

22,197

535

21,662

1979
2017
35 years
The Hampton & Ashley Inn
Vancouver
WA

1,855

21,047


1,855

21,047

22,902

581

22,321

1992
2017
35 years
The Hampton at Salmon Creek
Vancouver
WA
11,872

1,256

21,686


1,256

21,686

22,942

418

22,524

2013
2017
35 years
Outlook Pointe at Teays Valley
Hurricane
WV

1,950

14,489

300

1,950

14,789

16,739

2,912

13,827

1999
2011
35 years
Elmcroft of Martinsburg
Martinsburg
WV

248

8,320

9

248

8,329

8,577

2,655

5,922

1999
2006
35 years
Garden Square Assisted Living of Casper
Casper
WY

355

3,197


355

3,197

3,552

628

2,924

1996
2011
35 years
Whispering Chase
Cheyenne
WY

1,800

20,354


1,800

20,354

22,154

2,904

19,250

2008
2013
35 years
Hampton Care
Hampton
UK

3,923

27,637


3,923

27,637

31,560

485

31,075

2007
2017
40 years
Parkfield House Nursing Home
Uxbridge
UK

1,880

960


1,880

960

2,840

21

2,819

2000
2017
40 years
TOTAL FOR OTHER SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES
 
 
190,394

519,074

4,646,262

52,129

511,585

4,705,880

5,217,465

831,359

4,386,106

 
 
 
TOTAL FOR SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES
 
 
942,667

1,498,988

13,957,788

618,741

1,502,949

14,572,568

16,075,517

3,417,584

12,657,933

 
 
 
MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
St. Vincent's Medical Center East #46
Birmingham
AL


25,298

4,061


29,359

29,359

8,989

20,370

2005
2010
35 years
St. Vincent's Medical Center East #48
Birmingham
AL


12,698

509


13,207

13,207

3,641

9,566

1989
2010
35 years
St. Vincent's Medical Center East #52
Birmingham
AL


7,608

1,461


9,069

9,069

3,071

5,998

1985
2010
35 years
Crestwood Medical Pavilion
Huntsville
AL
3,226

625

16,178

159

625

16,337

16,962

3,804

13,158

1994
2011
35 years
Davita Dialysis - Marked Tree
Marked Tree
AR

179

1,580


179

1,580

1,759

190

1,569

2009
2015
35 years
West Valley Medical Center
Buckeye
AZ

3,348

5,233


3,348

5,233

8,581

775

7,806

2011
2015
31 years
Canyon Springs Medical Plaza
Gilbert
AZ


27,497

532


28,029

28,029

5,939

22,090

2007
2012
35 years
Mercy Gilbert Medical Plaza
Gilbert
AZ
7,330

720

11,277

1,068

720

12,345

13,065

3,281

9,784

2007
2011
35 years
Thunderbird Paseo Medical Plaza
Glendale
AZ


12,904

871

20

13,755

13,775

2,927

10,848

1997
2011
35 years
Thunderbird Paseo Medical Plaza II
Glendale
AZ


8,100

516

20

8,596

8,616

1,972

6,644

2001
2011
35 years
Desert Medical Pavilion
Mesa
AZ


32,768

501


33,269

33,269

4,933

28,336

2003
2013
35 years
Desert Samaritan Medical Building I
Mesa
AZ


11,923

677

4

12,596

12,600

2,630

9,970

1977
2011
35 years
Desert Samaritan Medical Building II
Mesa
AZ


7,395

405

4

7,796

7,800

1,800

6,000

1980
2011
35 years
Desert Samaritan Medical Building III
Mesa
AZ


13,665

1,203


14,868

14,868

3,219

11,649

1986
2011
35 years
Deer Valley Medical Office Building II
Phoenix
AZ


22,663

626

14

23,275

23,289

4,866

18,423

2002
2011
35 years
Deer Valley Medical Office Building III
Phoenix
AZ


19,521

287

12

19,796

19,808

4,239

15,569

2009
2011
35 years

166


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Papago Medical Park
Phoenix
AZ


12,172

1,561


13,733

13,733

2,983

10,750

1989
2011
35 years
North Valley Orthopedic Surgery Center
Phoenix
AZ

2,800

10,150


2,800

10,150

12,950

1,126

11,824

2006
2015
35 years
Burbank Medical Plaza
Burbank
CA

1,241

23,322

1,149

1,268

24,444

25,712

6,084

19,628

2004
2011
35 years
Burbank Medical Plaza II
Burbank
CA
33,726

491

45,641

382

497

46,017

46,514

9,744

36,770

2008
2011
35 years
Eden Medical Plaza
Castro Valley
CA

258

2,455

394

328

2,779

3,107

1,147

1,960

1998
2011
25 years
Sutter Medical Center
Castro Valley
CA


25,088

1,387


26,475

26,475

3,810

22,665

2012
2012
35 years
United Healthcare - Cypress
Cypress
CA

12,883

38,309


12,883

38,309

51,192

5,414

45,778

1985
2015
29 years
NorthBay Corporate Headquarters
Fairfield
CA


19,187



19,187

19,187

3,061

16,126

2008
2012
35 years
Gateway Medical Plaza
Fairfield
CA


12,872

65


12,937

12,937

2,054

10,883

1986
2012
35 years
Solano NorthBay Health Plaza
Fairfield
CA


8,880

39


8,919

8,919

1,410

7,509

1990
2012
35 years
NorthBay Healthcare MOB
Fairfield
CA


8,507

2,280


10,787

10,787

2,073

8,714

2014
2013
35 years
UC Davis Medical
Folsom
CA

1,873

10,156

13

1,873

10,169

12,042

1,225

10,817

1995
2015
35 years
Verdugo Hills Professional Bldg I
Glendale
CA

6,683

9,589

1,725

6,693

11,304

17,997

3,377

14,620

1972
2012
23 years
Verdugo Hills Professional Bldg II
Glendale
CA

4,464

3,731

2,359

4,469

6,085

10,554

2,079

8,475

1987
2012
19 years
Grossmont Medical Terrace
La Mesa
CA

88

14,192

126

88

14,318

14,406

850

13,556

2008
2016
35 years
St. Francis Lynwood Medical
Lynwood
CA

688

8,385

1,471

697

9,847

10,544

3,210

7,334

1993
2011
32 years
PMB Mission Hills
Mission Hills
CA

15,468

30,116

4,729

15,468

34,845

50,313

5,086

45,227

2012
2012
35 years
PDP Mission Viejo
Mission Viejo
CA
56,345

1,916

77,022

959

1,916

77,981

79,897

17,040

62,857

2007
2011
35 years
PDP Orange
Orange
CA
44,896

1,752

61,647

1,351

1,761

62,989

64,750

13,922

50,828

2008
2011
35 years
NHP/PMB Pasadena
Pasadena
CA

3,138

83,412

9,199

3,138

92,611

95,749

24,033

71,716

2009
2011
35 years
Western University of Health Sciences Medical Pavilion
Pomona
CA

91

31,523


91

31,523

31,614

6,547

25,067

2009
2011
35 years
Pomerado Outpatient Pavilion
Poway
CA

3,233

71,435

3,000

3,233

74,435

77,668

17,861

59,807

2007
2011
35 years
Sutter Van Ness
San Francisco
CA
34,675


84,520



84,520

84,520


84,520

CIP
CIP
CIP
San Gabriel Valley Medical
San Gabriel
CA

914

5,510

725

950

6,199

7,149

2,201

4,948

2004
2011
35 years
Santa Clarita Valley Medical
Santa Clarita
CA
22,236

9,708

20,020

1,500

9,782

21,446

31,228

5,104

26,124

2005
2011
35 years
Kenneth E Watts Medical Plaza
Torrance
CA

262

6,945

2,462

334

9,335

9,669

3,224

6,445

1989
2011
23 years
Vaca Valley Health Plaza
Vacaville
CA


9,634

612


10,246

10,246

1,516

8,730

1988
2012
35 years
Potomac Medical Plaza
Aurora
CO

2,401

9,118

3,162

2,800

11,881

14,681

5,655

9,026

1986
2007
35 years
Briargate Medical Campus
Colorado Springs
CO

1,238

12,301

442

1,259

12,722

13,981

4,710

9,271

2002
2007
35 years
Printers Park Medical Plaza
Colorado Springs
CO

2,641

47,507

1,828

2,641

49,335

51,976

17,936

34,040

1999
2007
35 years
Green Valley Ranch MOB
Denver
CO
5,485


12,139

1,011

235

12,915

13,150

1,841

11,309

2007
2012
35 years
Community Physicians Pavilion
Lafayette
CO


10,436

1,757


12,193

12,193

3,552

8,641

2004
2010
35 years
Exempla Good Samaritan Medical Center
Lafayette
CO


4,393

(75
)

4,318

4,318

504

3,814

2013
2013
35 years
Dakota Ridge
Littleton
CO

2,540

12,901

356

2,540

13,257

15,797

1,432

14,365

2007
2015
35 years
Avista Two Medical Plaza
Louisville
CO


17,330

1,811


19,141

19,141

6,242

12,899

2003
2009
35 years
The Sierra Medical Building
Parker
CO

1,444

14,059

3,287

1,492

17,298

18,790

6,712

12,078

2009
2009
35 years
Crown Point Healthcare Plaza
Parker
CO

852

5,210

109

852

5,319

6,171

860

5,311

2008
2013
35 years

167


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Lutheran Medical Office Building II
Wheat Ridge
CO


2,655

1,253


3,908

3,908

1,365

2,543

1976
2010
35 years
Lutheran Medical Office Building IV
Wheat Ridge
CO


7,266

1,947


9,213

9,213

2,553

6,660

1991
2010
35 years
Lutheran Medical Office Building III
Wheat Ridge
CO


11,947

1,094


13,041

13,041

3,328

9,713

2004
2010
35 years
DePaul Professional Office Building
Washington
DC


6,424

2,297


8,721

8,721

3,376

5,345

1987
2010
35 years
Providence Medical Office Building
Washington
DC


2,473

970


3,443

3,443

1,452

1,991

1975
2010
35 years
RTS Arcadia
Arcadia
FL

345

2,884


345

2,884

3,229

770

2,459

1993
2011
30 years
NorthBay Center For Primary Care - Vacaville
Vacaville
CA

777

5,632


777

5,632

6,409

47

6,362

1998
2017
35 years
Aventura Medical Plaza
Aventura
FL

401

3,338

49

401

3,387

3,788

675

3,113

1996
2015
26 years
RTS Cape Coral
Cape Coral
FL

368

5,448


368

5,448

5,816

1,229

4,587

1984
2011
34 years
RTS Englewood
Englewood
FL

1,071

3,516


1,071

3,516

4,587

851

3,736

1992
2011
35 years
RTS Ft. Myers
Fort Myers
FL

1,153

4,127


1,153

4,127

5,280

1,117

4,163

1989
2011
31 years
RTS Key West
Key West
FL

486

4,380


486

4,380

4,866

880

3,986

1987
2011
35 years
JFK Medical Plaza
Lake Worth
FL

453

1,711

303

453

2,014

2,467

799

1,668

1999
2004
35 years
East Pointe Medical Plaza
Lehigh Acres
FL

327

11,816


327

11,816

12,143

1,210

10,933

1994
2015
35 years
Palms West Building 6
Loxahatchee
FL

965

2,678

156

965

2,834

3,799

1,094

2,705

2000
2004
35 years
Bay Medical Plaza
Lynn Haven
FL

4,215

15,041

3

4,215

15,044

19,259

1,771

17,488

2003
2015
35 years
Aventura Heart & Health
Miami
FL
15,023


25,361

3,030


28,391

28,391

11,656

16,735

2006
2007
35 years
RTS Naples
Naples
FL

1,152

3,726


1,152

3,726

4,878

851

4,027

1999
2011
35 years
Bay Medical Center
Panama City
FL

82

17,400

3

82

17,403

17,485

1,779

15,706

1987
2015
35 years
Woodlands Center for Specialized Med
Pensacola
FL
14,073

2,518

24,006

30

2,518

24,036

26,554

5,399

21,155

2009
2012
35 years
RTS Pt. Charlotte
Pt Charlotte
FL

966

4,581


966

4,581

5,547

1,097

4,450

1985
2011
34 years
RTS Sarasota
Sarasota
FL

1,914

3,889


1,914

3,889

5,803

982

4,821

1996
2011
35 years
Capital Regional MOB I
Tallahassee
FL

590

8,773

59

590

8,832

9,422

812

8,610

1998
2015
35 years
University Medical Office Building
Tamarac
FL


6,690

393

5

7,078

7,083

2,755

4,328

2006
2007
35 years
RTS Venice
Venice
FL

1,536

4,104


1,536

4,104

5,640

997

4,643

1997
2011
35 years
Athens Medical Complex
Athens
GA

2,826

18,339

7

2,826

18,346

21,172

1,957

19,215

2011
2015
35 years
Doctors Center at St. Joseph's Hospital
Atlanta
GA

545

80,152

4,735

545

84,887

85,432

10,025

75,407

1978
2015
20 years
Augusta POB I
Augusta
GA

233

7,894

1,479

233

9,373

9,606

4,403

5,203

1978
2012
14 years
Augusta POB II
Augusta
GA

735

13,717

1,049

735

14,766

15,501

5,024

10,477

1987
2012
23 years
Augusta POB III
Augusta
GA

535

3,857

664

535

4,521

5,056

1,845

3,211

1994
2012
22 years
Augusta POB IV
Augusta
GA

675

2,182

2,115

691

4,281

4,972

1,519

3,453

1995
2012
23 years
Cobb Physicians Center
Austell
GA

1,145

16,805

1,228

1,145

18,033

19,178

5,249

13,929

1992
2011
35 years
Summit Professional Plaza I
Brunswick
GA

1,821

2,974

124

1,821

3,098

4,919

3,016

1,903

2004
2012
31 years
Summit Professional Plaza II
Brunswick
GA

981

13,818

33

981

13,851

14,832

3,380

11,452

1998
2012
35 years
Fayette MOB
Fayetteville
GA

895

20,669

372

895

21,041

21,936

2,164

19,772

2004
2015
35 years
Woodlawn Commons 1121/1163
Marietta
GA

5,495

16,028

1,150

5,540

17,133

22,673

1,872

20,801

1991
2015
35 years
PAPP Clinic
Newnan
GA

2,167

5,477

68

2,167

5,545

7,712

851

6,861

1994
2015
30 years
Parkway Physicians Center
Ringgold
GA

476

10,017

668

476

10,685

11,161

3,018

8,143

2004
2011
35 years
Riverdale MOB
Riverdale
GA

1,025

9,783

15

1,025

9,798

10,823

1,161

9,662

2005
2015
35 years

168


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Rush Copley POB I
Aurora
IL

120

27,882

449

120

28,331

28,451

2,927

25,524

1996
2015
34 years
Rush Copley POB II
Aurora
IL

49

27,217

457

49

27,674

27,723

2,785

24,938

2009
2015
35 years
Good Shepherd Physician Office Building I
Barrington
IL

152

3,224

227

152

3,451

3,603

521

3,082

1979
2013
35 years
Good Shepherd Physician Office Building II
Barrington
IL

512

12,977

438

512

13,415

13,927

2,092

11,835

1996
2013
35 years
Trinity Hospital Physician Office Building
Chicago
IL

139

3,329

1,121

139

4,450

4,589

656

3,933

1971
2013
35 years
Advocate Beverly Center
Chicago
IL

2,227

10,140

14

2,231

10,150

12,381

1,578

10,803

1986
2015
25 years
Crystal Lakes Medical Arts
Crystal Lake
IL

2,490

19,504

42

2,523

19,513

22,036

2,237

19,799

2007
2015
35 years
Advocate Good Shepherd
Crystal Lake
IL

2,444

10,953

112

2,444

11,065

13,509

1,452

12,057

2008
2015
33 years
Physicians Plaza East
Decatur
IL


791

1,894


2,685

2,685

756

1,929

1976
2010
35 years
Physicians Plaza West
Decatur
IL


1,943

597


2,540

2,540

938

1,602

1987
2010
35 years
SIU Family Practice
Decatur
IL


3,900

3,773


7,673

7,673

1,951

5,722

1996
2010
35 years
304 W Hay Building
Decatur
IL


8,702

615

29

9,288

9,317

2,753

6,564

2002
2010
35 years
302 W Hay Building
Decatur
IL


3,467

444


3,911

3,911

1,384

2,527

1993
2010
35 years
ENTA
Decatur
IL


1,150

16


1,166

1,166

415

751

1996
2010
35 years
301 W Hay Building
Decatur
IL


640



640

640

319

321

1980
2010
35 years
South Shore Medical Building
Decatur
IL

902

129

56

958

129

1,087

198

889

1991
2010
35 years
Kenwood Medical Center
Decatur
IL


1,689

1,505


3,194

3,194

661

2,533

1997
2010
35 years
Corporate Health Services
Decatur
IL

934

1,386


934

1,386

2,320

614

1,706

1996
2010
35 years
Rock Springs Medical
Decatur
IL

399

495


399

495

894

234

660

1990
2010
35 years
575 W Hay Building
Decatur
IL

111

739

24

111

763

874

293

581

1984
2010
35 years
Good Samaritan Physician Office Building I
Downers Grove
IL

407

10,337

791

407

11,128

11,535

1,645

9,890

1976
2013
35 years
Good Samaritan Physician Office Building II
Downers Grove
IL

1,013

25,370

785

1,013

26,155

27,168

3,922

23,246

1995
2013
35 years
Eberle Medical Office Building ("Eberle MOB")
Elk Grove Village
IL


16,315

404


16,719

16,719

6,415

10,304

2005
2009
35 years
1425 Hunt Club Road MOB
Gurnee
IL

249

1,452

824

249

2,276

2,525

592

1,933

2005
2011
34 years
1445 Hunt Club Drive
Gurnee
IL

216

1,405

353

216

1,758

1,974

783

1,191

2002
2011
31 years
Gurnee Imaging Center
Gurnee
IL

82

2,731


82

2,731

2,813

655

2,158

2002
2011
35 years
Gurnee Center Club
Gurnee
IL

627

17,851


627

17,851

18,478

4,497

13,981

2001
2011
35 years
South Suburban Hospital Physician Office Building
Hazel Crest
IL

191

4,370

225

191

4,595

4,786

779

4,007

1989
2013
35 years
755 Milwaukee MOB
Libertyville
IL

421

3,716

1,665

630

5,172

5,802

2,672

3,130

1990
2011
18 years
890 Professional MOB
Libertyville
IL

214

2,630

276

214

2,906

3,120

1,018

2,102

1980
2011
26 years
Libertyville Center Club
Libertyville
IL

1,020

17,176


1,020

17,176

18,196

4,445

13,751

1988
2011
35 years
Christ Medical Center Physician Office Building
Oak Lawn
IL

658

16,421

1,066

658

17,487

18,145

2,487

15,658

1986
2013
35 years
Methodist North MOB
Peoria
IL

1,025

29,493


1,025

29,493

30,518

3,071

27,447

2010
2015
35 years
Davita Dialysis - Rockford
Rockford
IL

256

2,543


256

2,543

2,799

312

2,487

2009
2015
35 years
Round Lake ACC
Round Lake
IL

758

370

378

799

707

1,506

551

955

1984
2011
13 years
Vernon Hills Acute Care Center
Vernon Hills
IL

3,376

694

264

3,413

921

4,334

668

3,666

1986
2011
15 years
Wilbur S. Roby Building
Anderson
IN


2,653

870


3,523

3,523

1,397

2,126

1992
2010
35 years

169


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Ambulatory Services Building
Anderson
IN


4,266

1,733


5,999

5,999

2,271

3,728

1995
2010
35 years
St. John's Medical Arts Building
Anderson
IN


2,281

1,450


3,731

3,731

1,148

2,583

1973
2010
35 years
Carmel I
Carmel
IN

466

5,954

610

466

6,564

7,030

1,831

5,199

1985
2012
30 years
Carmel II
Carmel
IN

455

5,976

704

455

6,680

7,135

1,644

5,491

1989
2012
33 years
Carmel III
Carmel
IN

422

6,194

662

422

6,856

7,278

1,551

5,727

2001
2012
35 years
Elkhart
Elkhart
IN

1,256

1,973


1,256

1,973

3,229

1,111

2,118

1994
2011
32 years
Lutheran Medical Arts
Fort Wayne
IN

702

13,576

47

702

13,623

14,325

1,481

12,844

2000
2015
35 years
Dupont Road MOB
Fort Wayne
IN

633

13,479

154

672

13,594

14,266

1,583

12,683

2001
2015
35 years
Harcourt Professional Office Building
Indianapolis
IN

519

28,951

2,419

519

31,370

31,889

8,030

23,859

1973
2012
28 years
Cardiac Professional Office Building
Indianapolis
IN

498

27,430

1,128

498

28,558

29,056

5,919

23,137

1995
2012
35 years
Oncology Medical Office Building
Indianapolis
IN

470

5,703

230

470

5,933

6,403

1,642

4,761

2003
2012
35 years
CorVasc Medical Office Building
Indianapolis
IN

514

9,617

14

514

9,631

10,145

562

9,583

2004
2016
36 years
St. Francis South Medical Office Building
Indianapolis
IN


20,649

1,121


21,770

21,770

3,602

18,168

1995
2013
35 years
Methodist Professional Center I
Indianapolis
IN

61

37,411

5,219

61

42,630

42,691

10,467

32,224

1985
2012
25 years
Indiana Orthopedic Center of Excellence
Indianapolis
IN

967

83,746

3,106

967

86,852

87,819

6,453

81,366

1997
2015
35 years
United Healthcare - Indy
Indianapolis
IN

5,737

32,116


5,737

32,116

37,853

3,599

34,254

1988
2015
35 years
LaPorte
La Porte
IN

553

1,309


553

1,309

1,862

479

1,383

1997
2011
34 years
Mishawaka
Mishawaka
IN

3,787

5,543


3,787

5,543

9,330

3,242

6,088

1993
2011
35 years
Cancer Care Partners
Mishawaka
IN

3,162

28,633


3,162

28,633

31,795

2,909

28,886

2010
2015
35 years
Michiana Oncology
Mishawaka
IN

4,577

20,939

4

4,581

20,939

25,520

2,228

23,292

2010
2015
35 years
DaVita Dialysis - Paoli
Paoli
IN

396

2,056


396

2,056

2,452

258

2,194

2011
2015
35 years
South Bend
South Bend
IN

792

2,530


792

2,530

3,322

766

2,556

1996
2011
34 years
Via Christi Clinic
Wichita
KS

1,883

7,428


1,883

7,428

9,311

922

8,389

2006
2015
35 years
OLBH Same Day Surgery Center MOB
Ashland
KY

101

19,066

608

101

19,674

19,775

4,819

14,956

1997
2012
26 years
St. Elizabeth Covington
Covington
KY

345

12,790

33

345

12,823

13,168

2,887

10,281

2009
2012
35 years
St. Elizabeth Florence MOB
Florence
KY

402

8,279

1,439

402

9,718

10,120

2,640

7,480

2005
2012
35 years
Jefferson Clinic
Louisville
KY


673

2,018


2,691

2,691

263

2,428

2013
2013
35 years
East Jefferson Medical Plaza
Metairie
LA

168

17,264

2,197

168

19,461

19,629

6,008

13,621

1996
2012
32 years
East Jefferson MOB
Metairie
LA

107

15,137

2,283

107

17,420

17,527

4,758

12,769

1985
2012
28 years
Lakeside POB I
Metairie
LA

3,334

4,974

3,198

3,334

8,172

11,506

3,279

8,227

1986
2011
22 years
Lakeside POB II
Metairie
LA

1,046

802

547

1,046

1,349

2,395

931

1,464

1980
2011
7 years
Fresenius Medical
Metairie
LA

1,195

3,797


1,195

3,797

4,992

427

4,565

2012
2015
35 years
RTS Berlin
Berlin
MD


2,216



2,216

2,216

546

1,670

1994
2011
29 years
Charles O. Fisher Medical Building
Westminster
MD
10,943


13,795

1,768


15,563

15,563

6,459

9,104

2009
2009
35 years
Medical Specialties Building
Kalamazoo
MI


19,242

1,508


20,750

20,750

5,621

15,129

1989
2010
35 years
North Professional Building
Kalamazoo
MI


7,228

1,633


8,861

8,861

3,001

5,860

1983
2010
35 years
Borgess Navigation Center
Kalamazoo
MI


2,391



2,391

2,391

694

1,697

1976
2010
35 years
Borgess Health & Fitness Center
Kalamazoo
MI


11,959

603


12,562

12,562

3,594

8,968

1984
2010
35 years
Heart Center Building
Kalamazoo
MI


8,420

440

10

8,850

8,860

2,876

5,984

1980
2010
35 years

170


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Medical Commons Building
Kalamazoo Township
MI


661

644


1,305

1,305

445

860

1979
2010
35 years
RTS Madison Heights
Madison Heights
MI

401

2,946


401

2,946

3,347

698

2,649

2002
2011
35 years
RTS Monroe
Monroe
MI

281

3,450


281

3,450

3,731

917

2,814

1997
2011
31 years
Bronson Lakeview OPC
Paw Paw
MI

3,835

31,564


3,835

31,564

35,399

3,629

31,770

2006
2015
35 years
Pro Med Center Plainwell
Plainwell
MI


697

7


704

704

223

481

1991
2010
35 years
Pro Med Center Richland
Richland
MI

233

2,267

77

233

2,344

2,577

658

1,919

1996
2010
35 years
Henry Ford Dialysis Center
Southfield
MI

589

3,350


589

3,350

3,939

381

3,558

2002
2015
35 years
Metro Health
Wyoming
MI

1,325

5,479


1,325

5,479

6,804

659

6,145

2008
2015
35 years
Spectrum Health
Wyoming
MI

2,463

14,353


2,463

14,353

16,816

1,727

15,089

2006
2015
35 years
Cogdell Duluth MOB
Duluth
MN


33,406

(19
)

33,387

33,387

5,162

28,225

2012
2012
35 years
Allina Health
Elk River
MN

1,442

7,742

54

1,442

7,796

9,238

1,058

8,180

2002
2015
35 years
Unitron Hearing
Plymouth
MN

2,646

8,962

5

2,646

8,967

11,613

1,511

10,102

2011
2015
29 years
HealthPartners Medical & Dental Clinics
Sartell
MN

2,492

15,694

49

2,503

15,732

18,235

3,787

14,448

2010
2012
35 years
Arnold Urgent Care
Arnold
MO

1,058

556

155

1,097

672

1,769

520

1,249

1999
2011
35 years
DePaul Health Center North
Bridgeton
MO

996

10,045

2,189

996

12,234

13,230

4,310

8,920

1976
2012
21 years
DePaul Health Center South
Bridgeton
MO

910

12,169

1,403

910

13,572

14,482

3,757

10,725

1992
2012
30 years
St. Mary's Health Center MOB D
Clayton
MO

103

2,780

925

103

3,705

3,808

1,415

2,393

1984
2012
22 years
Fenton Urgent Care Center
Fenton
MO

183

2,714

364

189

3,072

3,261

1,091

2,170

2003
2011
35 years
St. Joseph Medical Building
Kansas City
MO

305

7,445

2,286

305

9,731

10,036

2,005

8,031

1988
2012
32 years
St. Joseph Medical Mall
Kansas City
MO

530

9,115

608

530

9,723

10,253

2,327

7,926

1995
2012
33 years
Carondelet Medical Building
Kansas City
MO

745

12,437

1,800

745

14,237

14,982

3,698

11,284

1979
2012
29 years
St. Joseph Hospital West Medical Office Building II
Lake Saint Louis
MO

524

3,229

779

524

4,008

4,532

1,046

3,486

2005
2012
35 years
St. Joseph O'Fallon Medical Office Building
O'Fallon
MO

940

5,556

114

960

5,650

6,610

1,336

5,274

1992
2012
35 years
Sisters of Mercy Building
Springfield
MO

3,427

8,697


3,427

8,697

12,124

1,113

11,011

2008
2015
35 years
St. Joseph Health Center Medical Building 1
St. Charles
MO

503

4,336

1,220

503

5,556

6,059

2,010

4,049

1987
2012
20 years
St. Joseph Health Center Medical Building 2
St. Charles
MO

369

2,963

1,256

369

4,219

4,588

1,111

3,477

1999
2012
32 years
Physicians Office Center
St. Louis
MO

1,445

13,825

858

1,445

14,683

16,128

5,147

10,981

2003
2011
35 years
12700 Southford Road Medical Plaza
St. Louis
MO

595

12,584

1,607

595

14,191

14,786

4,800

9,986

1993
2011
32 years
St Anthony's MOB A
St. Louis
MO

409

4,687

1,369

409

6,056

6,465

2,447

4,018

1975
2011
20 years
St Anthony's MOB B
St. Louis
MO

350

3,942

923

350

4,865

5,215

2,159

3,056

1980
2011
21 years
Lemay Urgent Care Center
St. Louis
MO

2,317

3,120

635

2,351

3,721

6,072

1,820

4,252

1983
2011
22 years
St. Mary's Health Center MOB B
St. Louis
MO

119

4,161

11,075

119

15,236

15,355

1,654

13,701

1979
2012
23 years
St. Mary's Health Center MOB C
St. Louis
MO

136

6,018

992

136

7,010

7,146

2,127

5,019

1969
2012
20 years
University Physicians - Grants Ferry
Flowood
MS
8,815

2,796

12,125

(12
)
2,796

12,113

14,909

2,947

11,962

2010
2012
35 years
Randolph
Charlotte
NC

6,370

2,929

1,893

6,418

4,774

11,192

3,434

7,758

1973
2012
4 years
Mallard Crossing I
Charlotte
NC

3,229

2,072

673

3,269

2,705

5,974

1,703

4,271

1997
2012
25 years
Medical Arts Building
Concord
NC

701

11,734

1,051

701

12,785

13,486

3,924

9,562

1997
2012
31 years

171


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Gateway Medical Office Building
Concord
NC

1,100

9,904

629

1,100

10,533

11,633

3,220

8,413

2005
2012
35 years
Copperfield Medical Mall
Concord
NC

1,980

2,846

451

2,139

3,138

5,277

1,398

3,879

1989
2012
25 years
Weddington Internal & Pediatric Medicine
Concord
NC

574

688

30

574

718

1,292

299

993

2000
2012
27 years
Rex Wellness Center
Garner
NC

1,348

5,330

40

1,354

5,364

6,718

799

5,919

2003
2015
34 years
Gaston Professional Center
Gastonia
NC

833

24,885

2,384

833

27,269

28,102

5,947

22,155

1997
2012
35 years
Harrisburg Family Physicians
Harrisburg
NC

679

1,646

48

679

1,694

2,373

448

1,925

1996
2012
35 years
Harrisburg Medical Mall
Harrisburg
NC

1,339

2,292

246

1,339

2,538

3,877

1,010

2,867

1997
2012
27 years
Northcross
Huntersville
NC

623

278

73

623

351

974

228

746

1993
2012
22 years
REX Knightdale MOB & Wellness Center
Knightdale
NC


22,823

486


23,309

23,309

3,690

19,619

2009
2012
35 years
Midland Medical Park
Midland
NC

1,221

847

120

1,221

967

2,188

505

1,683

1998
2012
25 years
East Rocky Mount Kidney Center
Rocky Mount
NC

803

998

(2
)
803

996

1,799

370

1,429

2000
2012
33 years
Rocky Mount Kidney Center
Rocky Mount
NC

479

1,297

39

479

1,336

1,815

511

1,304

1990
2012
25 years
Rocky Mount Medical Park
Rocky Mount
NC

2,552

7,779

1,919

2,652

9,598

12,250

2,797

9,453

1991
2012
30 years
English Road Medical Center
Rocky Mount
NC
3,877

1,321

3,747

8

1,321

3,755

5,076

1,335

3,741

2002
2012
35 years
Rowan Outpatient Surgery Center
Salisbury
NC

1,039

5,184

(5
)
1,039

5,179

6,218

1,323

4,895

2003
2012
35 years
Trinity Health Medical Arts Clinic
Minot
ND

935

15,482

49

951

15,515

16,466

2,297

14,169

1995
2015
26 years
Cooper Health MOB I
Willingboro
NJ

1,389

2,742

(13
)
1,389

2,729

4,118

414

3,704

2010
2015
35 years
Cooper Health MOB II
Willingboro
NJ

594

5,638


594

5,638

6,232

604

5,628

2012
2015
35 years
Salem Medical
Woodstown
NJ

275

4,132

3

275

4,135

4,410

440

3,970

2010
2015
35 years
Carson Tahoe Specialty Medical Center
Carson City
NV

688

11,346

364

723

11,675

12,398

1,339

11,059

1981
2015
35 years
Carson Tahoe MOB West
Carson City
NV

2,862

27,519

249

2,877

27,753

30,630

3,821

26,809

2007
2015
29 years
Del E Webb Medical Plaza
Henderson
NV

1,028

16,993

1,515

1,028

18,508

19,536

5,153

14,383

1999
2011
35 years
Durango Medical Plaza
Las Vegas
NV

3,787

27,738

(3,128
)
3,677

24,720

28,397

2,841

25,556

2008
2015
35 years
The Terrace at South Meadows
Reno
NV
6,699

504

9,966

610

504

10,576

11,080

3,183

7,897

2004
2011
35 years
Albany Medical Center MOB
Albany
NY

321

18,389


321

18,389

18,710

1,684

17,026

2010
2015
35 years
St. Peter's Recovery Center
Guilderland
NY

1,059

9,156


1,059

9,156

10,215

1,127

9,088

1990
2015
35 years
Central NY Medical Center
Syracuse
NY

1,786

26,101

2,980

1,792

29,075

30,867

6,923

23,944

1997
2012
33 years
Northcountry MOB
Watertown
NY

1,320

10,799

7

1,320

10,806

12,126

1,346

10,780

2001
2015
35 years
Anderson Medical Arts Building I
Cincinnati
OH


9,632

1,948

20

11,560

11,580

4,608

6,972

1984
2007
35 years
Anderson Medical Arts Building II
Cincinnati
OH


15,123

2,282


17,405

17,405

6,972

10,433

2007
2007
35 years
Riverside North Medical Office Building
Columbus
OH

785

8,519

1,641

785

10,160

10,945

3,470

7,475

1962
2012
25 years
Riverside South Medical Office Building
Columbus
OH

586

7,298

833

610

8,107

8,717

2,567

6,150

1985
2012
27 years
340 East Town Medical Office Building
Columbus
OH

10

9,443

1,001

10

10,444

10,454

2,700

7,754

1984
2012
29 years
393 East Town Medical Office Building
Columbus
OH

61

4,760

320

61

5,080

5,141

1,614

3,527

1970
2012
20 years
141 South Sixth Medical Office Building
Columbus
OH

80

1,113

1,119

80

2,232

2,312

551

1,761

1971
2012
14 years
Doctors West Medical Office Building
Columbus
OH

414

5,362

840

414

6,202

6,616

1,655

4,961

1998
2012
35 years
Eastside Health Center
Columbus
OH

956

3,472

(2
)
956

3,470

4,426

1,674

2,752

1977
2012
15 years
East Main Medical Office Building
Columbus
OH

440

4,771

63

440

4,834

5,274

1,270

4,004

2006
2012
35 years
Heart Center Medical Office Building
Columbus
OH

1,063

12,140

280

1,063

12,420

13,483

3,377

10,106

2004
2012
35 years

172


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Wilkins Medical Office Building
Columbus
OH

123

18,062

343

123

18,405

18,528

3,968

14,560

2002
2012
35 years
Grady Medical Office Building
Delaware
OH

239

2,263

370

239

2,633

2,872

940

1,932

1991
2012
25 years
Dublin Northwest Medical Office Building
Dublin
OH

342

3,278

234

342

3,512

3,854

1,093

2,761

2001
2012
34 years
Preserve III Medical Office Building
Dublin
OH

2,449

7,025

(66
)
2,449

6,959

9,408

1,883

7,525

2006
2012
35 years
Zanesville Surgery Center
Zanesville
OH

172

9,403


172

9,403

9,575

2,126

7,449

2000
2011
35 years
Dialysis Center
Zanesville
OH

534

855

81

534

936

1,470

541

929

1960
2011
21 years
Genesis Children's Center
Zanesville
OH

538

3,781


538

3,781

4,319

1,184

3,135

2006
2011
30 years
Medical Arts Building I
Zanesville
OH

429

2,405

520

436

2,918

3,354

1,200

2,154

1970
2011
20 years
Medical Arts Building II
Zanesville
OH

485

6,013

835

510

6,823

7,333

2,780

4,553

1995
2011
25 years
Medical Arts Building III
Zanesville
OH

94

1,248


94

1,248

1,342

505

837

1970
2011
25 years
Primecare Building
Zanesville
OH

130

1,344

648

130

1,992

2,122

776

1,346

1978
2011
20 years
Outpatient Rehabilitation Building
Zanesville
OH

82

1,541


82

1,541

1,623

521

1,102

1985
2011
28 years
Radiation Oncology Building
Zanesville
OH

105

1,201


105

1,201

1,306

477

829

1988
2011
25 years
Healthplex
Zanesville
OH

2,488

15,849

648

2,508

16,477

18,985

5,213

13,772

1990
2011
32 years
Physicians Pavilion
Zanesville
OH

422

6,297

1,425

422

7,722

8,144

2,746

5,398

1990
2011
25 years
Zanesville Northside Pharmacy
Zanesville
OH

42

635


42

635

677

223

454

1985
2011
28 years
Bethesda Campus MOB III
Zanesville
OH

188

1,137

141

199

1,267

1,466

482

984

1978
2011
25 years
Tuality 7th Avenue Medical Plaza
Hillsboro
OR
18,230

1,516

24,638

1,387

1,533

26,008

27,541

6,694

20,847

2003
2011
35 years
Professional Office Building I
Chester
PA


6,283

2,410


8,693

8,693

4,178

4,515

1978
2004
30 years
DCMH Medical Office Building
Drexel Hill
PA


10,424

1,599


12,023

12,023

6,223

5,800

1984
2004
30 years
Pinnacle Health
Harrisburg
PA

2,574

16,767

407

2,674

17,074

19,748

2,050

17,698

2002
2015
35 years
Lancaster Rehabilitation Hospital
Lancaster
PA

959

16,610

(16
)
959

16,594

17,553

3,815

13,738

2007
2012
35 years
Lancaster ASC MOB
Lancaster
PA

593

17,117

433

593

17,550

18,143

4,469

13,674

2007
2012
35 years
St. Joseph Medical Office Building
Reading
PA


10,823

811


11,634

11,634

3,689

7,945

2006
2010
35 years
Crozer - Keystone MOB I
Springfield
PA

9,130

47,078


9,130

47,078

56,208

6,259

49,949

1996
2015
35 years
Crozer-Keystone MOB II
Springfield
PA

5,178

6,523


5,178

6,523

11,701

922

10,779

1998
2015
25 years
Doylestown Health & Wellness Center
Warrington
PA

4,452

17,383

960

4,497

18,298

22,795

4,799

17,996

2001
2012
34 years
Roper Medical Office Building
Charleston
SC
7,890

127

14,737

3,582

127

18,319

18,446

4,913

13,533

1990
2012
28 years
St. Francis Medical Plaza (Charleston)
Charleston
SC

447

3,946

621

447

4,567

5,014

1,369

3,645

2003
2012
35 years
Providence MOB I
Columbia
SC

225

4,274

869

225

5,143

5,368

2,105

3,263

1979
2012
18 years
Providence MOB II
Columbia
SC

122

1,834

172

150

1,978

2,128

854

1,274

1985
2012
18 years
Providence MOB III
Columbia
SC

766

4,406

797

766

5,203

5,969

1,635

4,334

1990
2012
23 years
One Medical Park
Columbia
SC

210

7,939

1,152

214

9,087

9,301

3,422

5,879

1984
2012
19 years
Three Medical Park
Columbia
SC

40

10,650

1,411

40

12,061

12,101

3,840

8,261

1988
2012
25 years
St. Francis Millennium Medical Office Building
Greenville
SC
14,707


13,062

10,618

30

23,650

23,680

9,808

13,872

2009
2009
35 years
200 Andrews
Greenville
SC

789

2,014

362

803

2,362

3,165

1,242

1,923

1994
2012
29 years
St. Francis CMOB
Greenville
SC

501

7,661

895

501

8,556

9,057

2,083

6,974

2001
2012
35 years
St. Francis Outpatient Surgery Center
Greenville
SC

1,007

16,538

889

1,007

17,427

18,434

4,449

13,985

2001
2012
35 years

173


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
St. Francis Professional Medical Center
Greenville
SC

342

6,337

1,336

371

7,644

8,015

2,211

5,804

1984
2012
24 years
St. Francis Women's
Greenville
SC

322

4,877

611

322

5,488

5,810

2,186

3,624

1991
2012
24 years
St. Francis Medical Plaza (Greenville)
Greenville
SC

88

5,876

1,028

98

6,894

6,992

1,995

4,997

1998
2012
24 years
Irmo Professional MOB
Irmo
SC

1,726

5,414

258

1,726

5,672

7,398

1,945

5,453

2004
2011
35 years
River Hills Medical Plaza
Little River
SC

1,406

1,813

187

1,406

2,000

3,406

736

2,670

1999
2012
27 years
Mount Pleasant Medical Office Longpoint
Mount Pleasant
SC

670

4,455

186

632

4,679

5,311

1,952

3,359

2001
2012
34 years
Mary Black Westside Medical Office Bldg
Spartanburg
SC

291

5,057

516

300

5,564

5,864

1,618

4,246

1991
2012
31 years
Spartanburg ASC
Spartanburg
SC

1,333

15,756


1,333

15,756

17,089

1,521

15,568

2002
2015
35 years
Spartanburg Regional MOB
Spartanburg
SC

207

17,963

550

286

18,434

18,720

1,995

16,725

1986
2015
35 years
Wellmont Blue Ridge MOB
Bristol
TN

999

5,027

32

999

5,059

6,058

628

5,430

2001
2015
35 years
Health Park Medical Office Building
Chattanooga
TN
5,955

2,305

8,949

51

2,305

9,000

11,305

2,317

8,988

2004
2012
35 years
Peerless Crossing Medical Center
Cleveland
TN

1,217

6,464

13

1,217

6,477

7,694

1,577

6,117

2006
2012
35 years
St. Mary's Clinton Professional Office Building
Clinton
TN

298

618

6

298

624

922

145

777

1988
2015
39 years
St. Mary's Farragut MOB
Farragut
TN

221

2,719

137

221

2,856

3,077

351

2,726

1997
2015
39 years
Medical Center Physicians Tower
Jackson
TN
13,344

549

27,074

50

598

27,075

27,673

6,744

20,929

2010
2012
35 years
St. Mary's Physician Professional Office Building
Knoxville
TN

138

3,144

129

138

3,273

3,411

509

2,902

1981
2015
39 years
St. Mary's Magdalene Clarke Tower
Knoxville
TN

69

4,153

11

69

4,164

4,233

583

3,650

1972
2015
39 years
St. Mary's Medical Office Building
Knoxville
TN

136

359

31

136

390

526

124

402

1976
2015
39 years
St. Mary's Ambulatory Surgery Center
Knoxville
TN

129

1,012


129

1,012

1,141

221

920

1999
2015
24 years
Texas Clinic at Arlington
Arlington
TX

2,781

24,515

91

2,781

24,606

27,387

2,680

24,707

2010
2015
35 years
Seton Medical Park Tower
Austin
TX

805

41,527

2,803

1,329

43,806

45,135

8,799

36,336

1968
2012
35 years
Seton Northwest Health Plaza
Austin
TX

444

22,632

2,809

444

25,441

25,885

5,188

20,697

1988
2012
35 years
Seton Southwest Health Plaza
Austin
TX

294

5,311

241

294

5,552

5,846

1,133

4,713

2004
2012
35 years
Seton Southwest Health Plaza II
Austin
TX

447

10,154

84

447

10,238

10,685

2,124

8,561

2009
2012
35 years
BioLife Sciences Building
Denton
TX

1,036

6,576


1,036

6,576

7,612

817

6,795

2010
2015
35 years
East Houston MOB, LLC
Houston
TX

356

2,877

702

328

3,607

3,935

2,084

1,851

1982
2011
15 years
East Houston Medical Plaza
Houston
TX

671

426

535

671

961

1,632

847

785

1982
2011
11 years
Memorial Hermann
Houston
TX

822

14,307


822

14,307

15,129

1,451

13,678

2012
2015
35 years
Scott & White Healthcare
Kingsland
TX

534

5,104


534

5,104

5,638

593

5,045

2012
2015
35 years
Odessa Regional MOB
Odessa
TX

121

8,935


121

8,935

9,056

942

8,114

2008
2015
35 years
Legacy Heart Center
Plano
TX

3,081

8,890

8

3,081

8,898

11,979

1,148

10,831

2005
2015
35 years
Seton Williamson Medical Plaza
Round Rock
TX


15,074

586


15,660

15,660

4,849

10,811

2008
2010
35 years
Sunnyvale Medical Plaza
Sunnyvale
TX

1,186

15,397

397

1,215

15,765

16,980

1,834

15,146

2009
2015
35 years
Texarkana ASC
Texarkana
TX

814

5,903


814

5,903

6,717

785

5,932

1994
2015
30 years
Spring Creek Medical Plaza
Tomball
TX

2,165

8,212

16

2,165

8,228

10,393

888

9,505

2006
2015
35 years
251 Medical Center
Webster
TX

1,158

12,078

(3,777
)
1,163

8,296

9,459

2,616

6,843

2006
2011
35 years

174


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
253 Medical Center
Webster
TX

1,181

11,862

(3,820
)
1,181

8,042

9,223

2,460

6,763

2009
2011
35 years
MRMC MOB I
Mechanicsville
VA

1,669

7,024

433

1,669

7,457

9,126

2,694

6,432

1993
2012
31 years
Henrico MOB
Richmond
VA

968

6,189

1,209

968

7,398

8,366

2,677

5,689

1976
2011
25 years
St. Mary's MOB North (Floors 6 & 7)
Richmond
VA

227

2,961

633

227

3,594

3,821

1,257

2,564

1968
2012
22 years
Virginia Urology Center
Richmond
VA

3,822

16,127


3,822

16,127

19,949

1,899

18,050

2004
2015
35 years
St. Francis Cancer Center
Richmond
VA

654

18,331

23

657

18,351

19,008

1,956

17,052

2006
2015
35 years
Bonney Lake Medical Office Building
Bonney Lake
WA
10,203

5,176

14,375

165

5,176

14,540

19,716

3,820

15,896

2011
2012
35 years
Good Samaritan Medical Office Building
Puyallup
WA
13,220

781

30,368

692

801

31,040

31,841

6,620

25,221

2011
2012
35 years
Holy Family Hospital Central MOB
Spokane
WA


19,085

260


19,345

19,345

3,181

16,164

2007
2012
35 years
Physician's Pavilion
Vancouver
WA

1,411

32,939

957

1,431

33,876

35,307

8,662

26,645

2001
2011
35 years
Administration Building
Vancouver
WA

296

7,856


296

7,856

8,152

2,013

6,139

1972
2011
35 years
Medical Center Physician's Building
Vancouver
WA

1,225

31,246

2,791

1,251

34,011

35,262

8,191

27,071

1980
2011
35 years
Memorial MOB
Vancouver
WA

663

12,626

750

690

13,349

14,039

3,307

10,732

1999
2011
35 years
Salmon Creek MOB
Vancouver
WA

1,325

9,238


1,325

9,238

10,563

2,340

8,223

1994
2011
35 years
Fisher's Landing MOB
Vancouver
WA

1,590

5,420


1,590

5,420

7,010

1,654

5,356

1995
2011
34 years
Columbia Medical Plaza Vancouver
Vancouver
WA

281

5,266

323

331

5,539

5,870

1,465

4,405

1991
2011
35 years
Appleton Heart Institute
Appleton
WI


7,775

31


7,806

7,806

2,126

5,680

2003
2010
39 years
Appleton Medical Offices West
Appleton
WI


5,756

85


5,841

5,841

1,602

4,239

1989
2010
39 years
Appleton Medical Offices South
Appleton
WI


9,058

185


9,243

9,243

2,671

6,572

1983
2010
39 years
Brookfield Clinic
Brookfield
WI

2,638

4,093


2,638

4,093

6,731

1,295

5,436

1999
2011
35 years
Lakeshore Medical Clinic - Franklin
Franklin
WI

1,973

7,579

65

2,029

7,588

9,617

940

8,677

2008
2015
34 years
Lakeshore Medical Clinic - Greenfield
Greenfield
WI

1,223

13,387

10

1,223

13,397

14,620

1,373

13,247

2010
2015
35 years
Aurora Health Care - Hartford
Hartford
WI

3,706

22,019


3,706

22,019

25,725

2,546

23,179

2006
2015
35 years
Hartland Clinic
Hartland
WI

321

5,050


321

5,050

5,371

1,361

4,010

1994
2011
35 years
Aurora Healthcare - Kenosha
Kenosha
WI

7,546

19,155


7,546

19,155

26,701

2,263

24,438

2014
2015
35 years
Univ of Wisconsin Health
Monona
WI

678

8,017


678

8,017

8,695

1,011

7,684

2011
2015
35 years
Theda Clark Medical Center Office Pavilion
Neenah
WI


7,080

747


7,827

7,827

2,008

5,819

1993
2010
39 years
Aylward Medical Building Condo Floors 3 & 4
Neenah
WI


4,462

95


4,557

4,557

1,330

3,227

2006
2010
39 years
Aurora Health Care - Neenah
Neenah
WI

2,033

9,072


2,033

9,072

11,105

1,126

9,979

2006
2015
35 years
New Berlin Clinic
New Berlin
WI

678

7,121


678

7,121

7,799

2,062

5,737

1999
2011
35 years
United Healthcare - Onalaska
Onalaska
WI

4,623

5,527


4,623

5,527

10,150

891

9,259

1995
2015
35 years
WestWood Health & Fitness
Pewaukee
WI

823

11,649


823

11,649

12,472

3,403

9,069

1997
2011
35 years
Aurora Health Care - Two Rivers
Two Rivers
WI

5,638

25,308


5,638

25,308

30,946

2,950

27,996

2006
2015
35 years
Watertown Clinic
Watertown
WI

166

3,234


166

3,234

3,400

841

2,559

2003
2011
35 years
Southside Clinic
Waukesha
WI

218

5,273


218

5,273

5,491

1,389

4,102

1997
2011
35 years
Rehabilitation Hospital
Waukesha
WI

372

15,636


372

15,636

16,008

3,608

12,400

2008
2011
35 years
United Healthcare - Wauwatosa
Wawatosa
WI

8,012

15,992


8,012

15,992

24,004

2,284

21,720

1995
2015
35 years

175


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
BSG CS, LLC
Waunakee
WI

1,060


(134
)
926


926


926

N/A
2012
N/A
TOTAL FOR MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS
 
 
350,898

389,589

4,108,450

249,979

392,718

4,355,300

4,748,018

950,558

3,797,460

 
 
 
LIFE SCIENCE AND INNOVATION CENTERS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
100 College Street
New Haven
CT

2,706

186,570

5,985

2,706

192,555

195,261

5,311

189,950

2013
2016
59 years
300 George Street
New Haven
CT

2,262

122,144

3,972

2,262

126,116

128,378

3,805

124,573

2014
2016
50 years
Univ. of Miami Life Science and Technology Park
Miami
FL

2,249

87,019

4,603

2,249

91,622

93,871

3,204

90,667

2014
2016
53 years
IIT
Chicago
IL

30

55,620

67

30

55,687

55,717

1,784

53,933

2006
2016
46 years
University of Maryland BioPark I Unit 1
Baltimore
MD

113

25,199

789

113

25,988

26,101

813

25,288

2005
2016
50 years
University of Maryland BioPark II
Baltimore
MD

61

91,764

3,243

61

95,007

95,068

3,446

91,622

2007
2016
50 years
University of Maryland BioPark Garage
Baltimore
MD

77

4,677

345

77

5,022

5,099

267

4,832

2007
2016
29 years
Tributary Street
Baltimore
MD

4,015

15,905

597

4,015

16,502

20,517

770

19,747

1998
2016
45 years
Beckley Street
Baltimore
MD

2,813

13,481

574

2,813

14,055

16,868

675

16,193

1999
2016
45 years
University of Maryland BioPark III
Baltimore
MD

980

34


980

34

1,014


1,014

CIP
CIP
CIP
Heritage at 4240
Saint Louis
MO

403

47,125

325

452

47,401

47,853

2,104

45,749

2013
2016
45 years
Cortex 1
Saint Louis
MO

631

26,543

1,094

631

27,637

28,268

1,301

26,967

2005
2016
50 years
BRDG Park
Saint Louis
MO

606

37,083

1,580

606

38,663

39,269

1,208

38,061

2009
2016
52 years
4220 Duncan Avenue
St Louis
MO



14,921

1,871

13,050

14,921


14,921

N/A
2016
N/A
311 South Sarah Street
St. Louis
MO

7,567

(1,775
)

7,567

(1,775
)
5,792

6

5,786

CIP
CIP
CIP
4300 Duncan
St. Louis
MO

2,818

46,749


2,818

46,749

49,567

130

49,437

2008
2017
35 years
Weston Parkway
Cary
NC

1,372

6,535

1,018

1,372

7,553

8,925

285

8,640

1990
2016
50 years
Patriot Drive
Durham
NC

1,960

10,749

373

1,960

11,122

13,082

465

12,617

2010
2016
50 years
Chesterfield
Durham
NC

3,266

58,020


3,266

58,020

61,286

841

60,445

2017
2017
60 years
Paramount Parkway
Morrisville
NC

1,016

19,794

617

1,016

20,411

21,427

869

20,558

1999
2016
45 years
Wake 90
Winston-Salem
NC

2,752

79,949

105

2,752

80,054

82,806

3,196

79,610

2013
2016
40 years
Wake 91
Winston-Salem
NC

1,729

73,690


1,729

73,690

75,419

2,395

73,024

2011
2016
50 years
Wake 60
Winston-Salem
NC
15,000

1,243

83,414

1,868

1,243

85,282

86,525

3,320

83,205

2016
2016
35 years
Bailey Power Plant
Winston-Salem
NC

1,930

33,395


1,930

33,395

35,325


35,325

2017
2017
35 years
Hershey Center Unit 1
Hummelstown
PA

813

23,699

786

813

24,485

25,298

918

24,380

2007
2016
50 years
3737 Market Street
Philadelphia
PA

40

141,981

5,711

40

147,692

147,732

3,950

143,782

2014
2016
54 years
3711 Market Street
Philadelphia
PA

12,320

69,278

2,597

12,320

71,875

84,195

2,342

81,853

2008
2016
48 years
3750 Lancaster Avenue
Philadelphia
PA


205



205

205


205

CIP
CIP
CIP
3675 Market Street
Philadelphia
PA

11,370

53,539


11,370

53,539

64,909


64,909

CIP
CIP
CIP
3701 Filbert Street
Philadelphia
PA


1,080



1,080

1,080


1,080

CIP
CIP
CIP
115 North 38th Street
Philadelphia
PA


289



289

289


289

CIP
CIP
CIP
225 North 38th Street
Philadelphia
PA


2,460



2,460

2,460


2,460

CIP
CIP
CIP
South Street Landing
Providence
RI

6,358

112,036


6,358

112,036

118,394

997

117,397

2017
2017
45 years

176


 
Location
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Name
City
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
2/3 Davol Square
Providence
RI

4,537

6,886


4,537

6,886

11,423

660

10,763

2005
2017
15 years
One Ship Street
Providence
RI

1,943

1,734


1,943

1,734

3,677

58

3,619

1980
2017
25 years
Brown Academic/R&D Building
Providence
RI



9,834


9,834

9,834


9,834

2007
2016
55 years
IRP I
Norfolk
VA

60

20,084

607

60

20,691

20,751

720

20,031

2007
2016
55 years
IRP II
Norfolk
VA

69

21,255

748

69

22,003

22,072

715

21,357

2007
2016
55 years
Wexford Biotech 8
Richmond
VA

2,615

85,496


2,615

85,496

88,111

474

87,637

2012
2017
35 years
TOTAL FOR LIFE SCIENCE AND INNOVATION CENTERS
 
 
14,999

82,724

1,663,706

62,359

84,644

1,724,145

1,808,789

47,029

1,761,760

 
 
 
TOTAL OFFICE BUILDINGS
 
 
365,897

472,313

5,772,156

312,338

477,362

6,079,445

6,556,807

997,587

5,559,220

 
 
 
TOTAL FOR ALL PROPERTIES
 
 
$
1,308,564

$
2,140,863

$
21,575,402

$
951,573

$
2,147,621

$
22,520,217

$
24,667,838

$
4,785,395

$
19,882,443

 
 
 


177


VENTAS, INC.
SCHEDULE IV
MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
December 31, 2017
 
Location
Number of RE Assets
Interest Rate
Fixed / Variable
Maturity Date
Monthly Debt Service
Face Value
Net Book Value
Prior Liens
 
 
 
 
 
 
(In thousands)
First Mortgages
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Multiple
3
9.77%
V
6/30/2019
$
137

$
17,023

$
17,023

$

 
Ohio
5
8.13%
V
10/1/2021
535

78,448

78,448


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mezzanine Loans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Multiple
31
9.95%
F/V
2/6/2021
1,091

121,699

121,699

1,420,844

 
Multiple*
179
8.27%
F/V
12/9/2019
2,138

290,099

290,099

1,560,415

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Construction Loans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Colorado
1
8.75%
V
2/6/2021
437

59,045

58,606


Total
 
 
 
 
$
4,338

$
566,314

$
565,875

$
2,981,259

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
* The variable portion of this investment has a maturity date of 12/9/2018, with extension options to 12/9/2019.
 
Mortgage Loan Reconciliation
 
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
 
(In thousands)
 
Beginning Balance
 
$
634,969

 
$
784,821

 
$
747,456

 
Additions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
New Loans
 

 
140,000

 
88,648

 
Construction Draws
 

 
13,403

 
53,708

 
Total additions
 

 
153,403

 
142,356

 
Deductions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Principal Repayments
 
(68,655
)
 
(303,255
)
 
(99,467
)
 
Spin Off
 

 

 
(5,524
)
 
Total deductions
 
(68,655
)
 
(303,255
)
 
(104,991
)
 
Ending Balance
 
$
566,314

 
$
634,969

 
$
784,821


178


ITEM 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.

ITEM 9A.    Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2017. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective as of December 31, 2017, at the reasonable assurance level.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The information set forth under “Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” and “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference into this Item 9A.
Internal Control Changes
During the fourth quarter of 2017, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


ITEM 9B.    Other Information

Not applicable.

PART III

ITEM 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this Item 10 is incorporated by reference to the material under the headings “Proposals Requiring Your Vote—Proposal 1: Election of Directors,” “Our Executive Officers,” “Securities Ownership—Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Corporate Governance—Governance Policies” and “Audit and Compliance Committee” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC not later than April 30, 2018.

ITEM 11.    Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated by reference to the material under the headings “Executive Compensation,” “Non-Employee Director Compensation” and “Executive Compensation Committee” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC not later than April 30, 2018.

ITEM 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this Item 12 is incorporated by reference to the material under the headings “Equity Compensation Plan Information” and “Securities Ownership” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC not later than April 30, 2018.


179


ITEM 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
    
The information required by this Item 13 is incorporated by reference to the material under the headings “Corporate Governance—Transactions with Related Persons,” “Our Board of Directors—Director Independence,” “Audit and Compliance Committee,” “Executive Compensation Committee” and “Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC not later than April 30, 2018.


ITEM 14.    Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated by reference to the material under the heading “Proposals Requiring Your Vote—Proposal 2: Ratification of the Selection of KPMG LLP as Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal Year 2018” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC not later than April 30, 2018.


180


PART IV
ITEM 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
The following documents have been included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
 
Page
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules
 
All other schedules have been omitted because they are inapplicable, not required or the information is included elsewhere in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.
Exhibits
The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K which are filed with this report are listed in the Exhibit Index.


181


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 9, 2018
 
 
VENTAS, INC.
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ DEBRA A. CAFARO
 
 
 
Debra A. Cafaro
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


182


Signature
Title
Date
 
 
 
/s/ DEBRA A. CAFARO
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
February 9, 2018
Debra A. Cafaro
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ ROBERT F. PROBST
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
February 9, 2018
Robert F. Probst
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ GREGORY R. LIEBBE
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
February 9, 2018
Gregory R. Liebbe
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ MELODY C. BARNES
Director
February 9, 2018
Melody C. Barnes
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ JAY M. GELLERT
Director
February 9, 2018
Jay M. Gellert
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ RICHARD I. GILCHRIST
Director
February 9, 2018
Richard I. Gilchrist
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ MATTHEW J. LUSTIG
Director
February 9, 2018
Matthew J. Lustig
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ ROXANNE M. MARTINO
Director
February 9, 2018
Roxanne M. Martino
 
 
 
 
 
/s/WALTER C. RAKOWICH
Director
February 9, 2018
Walter C. Rakowich
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ ROBERT D. REED
Director
February 9, 2018
Robert D. Reed
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ GLENN J. RUFRANO
Director
February 9, 2018
Glenn J. Rufrano
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ JAMES D. SHELTON
Director
February 9, 2018
James D. Shelton
 
 
 
 
 



183


EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
Number
 
Description of Document
 
Location of Document
 
Separation and Distribution Agreement dated as of August 17, 2015 by and between Ventas, Inc. and Care Capital Properties, Inc.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 21, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, of Ventas, Inc.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, filed on August 5, 2011, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fifth Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended, of Ventas, Inc.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 11, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Specimen common stock certificate.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, filed on February 12, 2016, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Indenture dated as of September 19, 2006 by and among Ventas, Inc., Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuer(s), the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.9 to our Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed on April 7, 2006, File No. 333-133115.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 17, 2011 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.750% Senior Notes due 2021.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 20, 2011, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 10, 2012 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.250% Senior Notes due 2022.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 14, 2012, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 17, 2012 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.000% Senior Notes due 2019.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 18, 2012, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Seventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 3, 2012 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.250% Senior Notes due 2022.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, filed on October 26, 2012, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Eighth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 13, 2012 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 2.000% Senior Notes due 2018.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 13, 2012, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ninth Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 7, 2013 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 5.450% Senior Notes due 2043.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Registration Statement on Form 8-A, filed on March 7, 2013, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 

184


Exhibit
Number
 
Description of Document
 
Location of Document
 
Tenth Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 19, 2013 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 2.700% Senior Notes due 2020.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 19, 2013, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Indenture dated as of September 26, 2013 by and among Ventas, Inc., Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.10 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed on February 14, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 26, 2013 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 5.700% Senior Notes due 2043.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 26, 2013, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 17, 2014 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.750% Senior Notes due 2024.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 17, 2014, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 14, 2015 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.500% Senior Notes due 2025.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 14, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 14, 2015 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.375% Senior Notes due 2045.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 14, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Indenture dated as of August 19, 1997 by and between Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, relating to the 6.90% Series C Medium-Term Notes due 2037 and the 6.59% Series C Medium-Term Notes due 2038.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 1.2 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 19, 1997, File No. 001-09028 (see Exhibit 1.2 of complete submission text file).
 
 
 
 
 
 
Supplemental Indenture dated July 1, 2011 among Nationwide Health Properties, Inc., Needles Acquisition LLC, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as successor Trustee, relating to the 6.90% Series C Medium-Term Notes due 2037 and the 6.59% Series C Medium-Term Notes due 2038.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.17 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed on February 14, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Indenture dated as September 24, 2014 by and among Ventas, Inc., Ventas Canadian Finance Limited, the Guarantors parties thereto from time to time and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, filed on October 24, 2014, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 24, 2014 by and among Ventas Canada Finance Limited, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee, relating to the 3.00% Senior Notes, Series A due 2019.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, filed on October 24, 2014, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 

185


Exhibit
Number
 
Description of Document
 
Location of Document
 
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 24, 2014 by and among Ventas Canada Finance Limited, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee, relating to the 4.125% Senior Notes, Series B due 2024.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, filed on October 24, 2014, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 13, 2015 by and among Ventas Canada Finance Limited, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee, relating to the 3.30% Senior Notes, Series C due 2022.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.24 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed on February 13, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 1, 2017 by and among Ventas Canada Finance Limited, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee, relating to the 2.55% Senior Notes, Series D due 2023.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, filed on July 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Indenture dated as of July 16, 2015 by and among Ventas, Inc., Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein as Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 16, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 16, 2015 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.125% Senior Notes due 2026.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 16, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 2, 2016 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.125% Senior Notes due 2023.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 2, 2016, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 21, 2016 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.250% Senior Notes due 2026.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 21, 2016, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 29, 2017 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.100% Senior Notes due 2023 and the 3.850% Senior Notes due 2027.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 29, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 3.5 to our Registration Statement on Form S-4, as amended, filed on May 29, 2002, File No. 333-89312.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Second Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2017, among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, Ventas SSL Ontario II, Inc., Ventas SSL Ontario III, Inc., Ventas Canada Finance Limited, Ventas UK Finance, Inc., and Ventas Euro Finance, LLC, as Borrowers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, the Lenders identified therein, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and Alternative Currency Fronting Lender, Bank of America, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Swing Line Lenders and L/C Issuers.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 

186


Exhibit
Number
 
Description of Document
 
Location of Document
 
Tax Matters Agreement dated as of August 17, 2015 by and between Ventas, Inc. and Care Capital Properties, Inc.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 21, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Employee Matters Agreement dated as of August 17, 2015 by and between Ventas, Inc. and Care Capital Properties, Inc.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 21, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ventas, Inc. 2004 Stock Plan for Directors, as amended.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.16.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed on March 1, 2005, File No. 33-107942.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ventas, Inc. 2006 Incentive Plan, as amended.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 27, 2009, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Form of Stock Option Agreement—2006 Incentive Plan.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.15.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed on February 22, 2007, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement—2006 Incentive Plan.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.15.3 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed on February 22, 2007, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ventas, Inc. 2006 Stock Plan for Directors, as amended.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, filed on April 27, 2012, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Form of Stock Option Agreement—2006 Stock Plan for Directors.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.11.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 27, 2009, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Form of Amendment to Stock Option Agreement—2006 Stock Plan for Directors.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, filed on April 27, 2012, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement—2006 Stock Plan for Directors.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.11.4 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 27, 2009, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 23, 2012, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
First Amendment to the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.7 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Form of Stock Option Agreement (Employees) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.6.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed February 13, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (Employees) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.6.3 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed on February 13, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 

187


Exhibit
Number
 
Description of Document
 
Location of Document
 
Form of Stock Option Agreement (Directors) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.4 to our Registration Form on S-8, filed on August 7, 2012, File No. 333-183121.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (Directors) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.5 to our Registration Form on S-8, filed on August 7, 2012, File No. 333-183121.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Directors) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.6 to our Registration Form on S-8, filed on August 7, 2012, File No. 333-183121.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (CEO) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.8 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (CEO) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.9 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Form of Transition Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (CEO) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.10 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Non-CEO) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.11 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Non-CEO) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.12 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Form of Transition Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Non-CEO) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.13 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ventas Executive Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, as amended and restated on December 7, 2017.
 
Filed herewith.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferral Election Form under the Ventas Executive Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, as amended and restated on December 7, 2017.
 
Filed herewith.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ventas Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, as amended.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.13.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 27, 2009, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferral Election Form under the Ventas Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.13.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 27, 2009, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. 2005 Performance Incentive Plan.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Appendix B to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. definitive Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting, filed on March 24, 2005, File No. 001-09028.
 
 
 
 
 
 
First Amendment to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. 2005 Performance Incentive Plan, dated October 28, 2008.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 3, 2008, File No. 001-09028.

188


Exhibit
Number
 
Description of Document
 
Location of Document
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Retirement Plan for Directors, as amended and restated on April 20, 2006.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, filed on May 4, 2006, File No. 001-09028.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amendment dated October 28, 2008 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Retirement Plan for Directors, as amended and restated on April 20, 2006.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 3, 2008, File No. 001-09028.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of March 22, 2011 between Ventas, Inc. and Debra A. Cafaro.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 24, 2011, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Employment Agreement dated as of July 31, 1998 between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.15.2.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed on February 26, 2003, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amendment dated as of September 30, 1999 to Employment Agreement between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.15.2.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed on February 26, 2003, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amendment dated as of March 19, 2007 to Employment Agreement between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 23, 2007, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amendment dated as of December 31, 2008 to Employment Agreement between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.15.4 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 27, 2009, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amended and Restated Change-in-Control Severance Agreement dated as of March 22, 2011 between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 24, 2011, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Employment Agreement dated as of June 22, 2010 between Ventas, Inc. and Todd W. Lillibridge.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, filed on July 30, 2010, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Employee Protection and Noncompetition Agreement dated June 17, 2015 between Ventas, Inc. and Todd W. Lillibridge.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 23, 2015, File No., 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Employment Transition Agreement dated as of July 25, 2017 between Ventas, Inc. and Todd W. Lillibridge.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, filed on October 27, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Employee Protection and Noncompetition Agreement dated as of October 21, 2013 between Ventas, Inc. and John D. Cobb.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.18 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed on February 18, 2014, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amendment dated December 8, 2017 to Employee Protection and Noncompetition Agreement dated as of October 21, 2013 between Ventas, Inc. and John D. Cobb.
 
Filed herewith.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Offer Letter dated September 16, 2014 from Ventas, Inc. to Robert F. Probst.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 29, 2014, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Employee Protection and Noncompetition Agreement dated September 16, 2014 between Ventas, Inc. and Robert F. Probst.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 29, 2014, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 

189


Exhibit
Number
 
Description of Document
 
Location of Document
 
Amendment dated December 8, 2017 to Employee Protection and Noncompetition Agreement dated as of September 16, 2014 between Ventas, Inc. and Robert F. Probst.
 
Filed herewith.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ventas Employee and Director Stock Purchase Plan, as amended.
 
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.18 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 27, 2009, File No. 001-10989.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Statement Regarding Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
 
Filed herewith.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subsidiaries of Ventas, Inc.
 
Filed herewith.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consent of KPMG LLP.
 
Filed herewith.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Certification of Debra A. Cafaro, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act.
 
Filed herewith.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Certification of Robert F. Probst, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act.
 
Filed herewith.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Certification of Debra A. Cafaro, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. 1350.
 
Filed herewith.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Certification of Robert F. Probst, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. 1350.
 
Filed herewith.
 
 
 
 
 
101
 
Interactive Data File.
 
Filed herewith.
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(b) of Form 10-K.


190


ITEM 16.    Form 10-K Summary
None.


191