Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-Q dated June 30, 2008

Navigation Links           Click here to quickly move through the content of the Form 10-Q filing.


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

___________________________

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission File Number 1-13578

DOWNEY FINANCIAL CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

33-0633413
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3501 Jamboree Road, Newport Beach, CA
(Address of principal executive office)

92660
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

(949) 854-0300

N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  þ    No  o

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

  Large accelerated filer  þ   Accelerated filer  o  
  Non-accelerated filer  o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)   Smaller reporting company o  

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  o    No  þ

          At June 30, 2008, 27,853,783 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock, $0.01 par value were outstanding.


Page
Navigation Links

DOWNEY FINANCIAL CORP.

June 30, 2008 QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. –

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS           

1

Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2008 and 2007 and December 31, 2007          

1

Consolidated Statements of Income (loss) for the three and six months ended

June 30, 2008 and 2007          

2

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (loss) for the three and six months ended

June 30, 2008 and 2007          

3

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended

June 30, 2008 and 2007          

4

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements           

6

ITEM 2. –

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS           

21

ITEM 3. –

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK           

66

ITEM 4. –

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES           

66

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. –

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS           

67

ITEM 1A. –

RISK FACTORS           

67

ITEM 2. –

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS           

68

ITEM 3. –

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES           

69

ITEM 4. –

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITIY HOLDERS           

69

ITEM 5. –

OTHER INFORMATION           

69

ITEM 6. –

EXHIBITS           

69

AVAILABILITY OF REPORTS           

70

SIGNATURES           

70


Page i
Navigation Links

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DOWNEY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)

June 30,

December 31,

June 30,

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

2008

2007

2007


Assets

Cash

$

82,072

$

83,840

$

149,308

Federal funds and interest earning due from banks

11,060

5,900

-


Cash and cash equivalents

93,132

89,740

149,308

U.S. Treasury, government sponsored entities and other investment

securities available for sale, at fair value

998,457

1,549,879

1,917,603

Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value

85,558

103,384

187,752

Mortgage-backed securities available for sale, at fair value

106

111

114

Loans held for investment

11,363,366

11,381,327

12,273,307

Allowance for loan losses

(732,354

)

(348,167

)

(69,107

)


Loans held for investment, net

10,631,012

11,033,160

12,204,200

Investments in real estate and joint ventures

63,182

68,679

64,997

Real estate acquired in settlement of loans, net

261,536

115,623

29,925

Premises and equipment, net

115,064

115,846

115,823

Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost

78,813

70,964

72,429

Mortgage servicing rights:

Measured at fair value

23,558

-

-

Amortized

-

19,512

21,619

Other assets

129,293

113,761

113,212

Income tax receivable

95,505

6,312

25,988

Deferred tax asset, net

57,103

122,086

-


$

12,632,319

$

13,409,057

$

14,902,970


Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Deposits

$

9,880,978

$

10,496,041

$

11,246,806

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

97,838

-

587,544

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

1,525,034

1,197,100

1,104,373

Senior notes

198,543

198,445

198,351

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

70,989

183,054

289,937

Deferred income taxes

-

-

11,486


Total liabilities

11,773,382

12,074,640

13,438,497


Stockholders’ equity

Preferred stock, par value of $0.01 per share; authorized 5,000,000 shares;

outstanding none

-

-

-

Common stock, par value of $0.01 per share; authorized 50,000,000 shares;

issued 28,235,022 shares at June 30, 2008, December 31, 2007 and

June 30, 2007; outstanding 27,853,783 shares at June 30, 2008,

December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2007

282

282

282

Additional paid-in capital

93,792

93,792

93,792

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

(304

)

2,768

(6,068

)

Retained earnings

781,959

1,254,367

1,393,259

Treasury stock, at cost, 381,239 shares at June 30, 2008,

December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2007

(16,792

)

(16,792

)

(16,792

)


Total stockholders’ equity

858,937

1,334,417

1,464,473


$

12,632,319

$

13,409,057

$

14,902,970


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 1
Navigation Links

DOWNEY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) (unaudited)

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

June 30,

June 30,


(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

2008

2007

2008

2007


Interest income

Loans

$

161,157

$

230,383

$

338,714

$

482,555

U.S. Treasury and government sponsored entities securities

15,865

20,120

36,353

39,294

Mortgage-backed securities

3

3

6

6

Other investment securities

1,025

1,718

2,103

4,189


Total interest income

178,050

252,224

377,176

526,044


Interest expense

Deposits

78,893

111,888

175,321

225,463

Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings

12,922

25,576

28,591

57,406

Senior notes

3,304

3,301

6,608

6,602


Total interest expense

95,119

140,765

210,520

289,471


Net interest income

82,931

111,459

166,656

236,573

Provision for credit losses

258,874

9,505

495,744

10,122


Net interest income (loss) after provision for credit losses

(175,943

)

101,954

(329,088

)

226,451


Other income, net

Loan and deposit related fees

8,204

9,338

16,443

18,174

Real estate and joint ventures held for investment, net

(5,271

)

(111

)

(5,876

)

365

Secondary marketing activities:

Loan servicing income (loss), net

3,976

(789

)

2,780

(1,225

)

Net gains on sales of loans and mortgage-backed securities

4,572

8,978

6,221

17,718

Net gains on sales of investment securities

-

-

837

-

Other

584

109

598

181


Total other income, net

12,065

17,525

21,003

35,213


Operating expense

Salaries and related costs

40,884

40,998

80,586

83,232

Premises and equipment costs

9,181

9,122

18,178

17,931

Advertising expense

816

1,878

1,277

3,069

Deposit insurance premiums and regulatory assessments

3,689

2,482

7,392

5,246

Professional fees

843

731

1,146

1,290

Impairment writedown of goodwill

-

-

3,149

-

Other general and administrative expense

8,974

6,201

17,454

15,996


Total general and administrative expense

64,387

61,412

129,182

126,764

Net operation of real estate acquired in settlement of loans

24,139

948

48,335

1,239


Total operating expense

88,526

62,360

177,517

128,003


Income (loss) before income taxes (tax benefits)

(252,404

)

57,119

(485,602

)

133,661

Income taxes (tax benefits)

(33,485

)

24,375

(18,986

)

58,054


Net income (loss)

$

(218,919

)

$

32,744

$

(466,616

)

$

75,607


Per share information

Basic

$

(7.86

)

$

1.17

$

(16.75

)

$

2.71

Diluted

$

(7.86

)

$

1.17

$

(16.75

)

$

2.71

Cash dividends declared and paid

$

0.12

$

0.12

$

0.24

$

0.24

Weighted average shares outstanding

Basic

27,853,783

27,853,783

27,853,783

27,853,783

Diluted

27,853,783

27,884,062

27,853,783

27,884,046


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 2
Navigation Links

DOWNEY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (unaudited)

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

June 30,

June 30,


(In Thousands)

2008

2007

2008

2007


Net income (loss)

$

(218,919

)

$

32,744

$

(466,616

)

$

75,607


Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes (tax benefits)

Unrealized losses on securities available for sale:

U.S. Treasury, government sponsored entities and other investment

securities available for sale, at fair value

(9,879

)

(4,306

)

(3,059

)

(718

)

Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges:

Net derivative instruments

740

671

(215

)

825

Reclassification of realized amounts included in net income

(147

)

(757

)

202

(971

)


Total other comprehensive loss, net of income tax benefits

(9,286

)

(4,392

)

(3,072

)

(864

)


Comprehensive income (loss)

$

(228,205

)

$

28,352

$

(469,688

)

$

74,743


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 3
Navigation Links

DOWNEY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)

Six Months Ended June 30,

June 30,


(In Thousands)

2008

2007


Cash flows from operating activities

Net income (loss)

$

(466,616

)

$

75,607

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used for operating activities:

Depreciation

7,187

7,138

Amortization

10,923

59,362

Impairment writedown of goodwill

3,149

-

Provision for losses on loans, loan-related commitments, investments in

real estate and joint ventures, mortgage servicing rights,

real estate acquired in settlement of loans, and other assets

541,514

11,032

Net gains on sales of loans and mortgage-backed securities, mortgage servicing rights,

investment securities, real estate and other assets

(13,392

)

(16,727

)

Interest capitalized on loans (negative amortization)

(59,290

)

(144,884

)

Changes in fair value of mortgage servicing rights due to:

Changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions

(1,574

)

-

Other changes

1,488

-

Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends

(1,956

)

(4,036

)

Loans originated or purchased for sale

(449,082

)

(1,135,540

)

Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale, including those sold

as mortgage-backed securities

466,592

1,296,511

Other, net

(144,810

)

(140,160

)


Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities

(105,867

)

8,303


Cash flows from investing activities

Proceeds from:

Sales of wholly owned real estate and real estate acquired in settlement of loans

79,509

8,034

Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock

2,400

84,560

Maturities or calls of U.S. Treasury, government sponsored entities

and other investment securities available for sale

808,610

214,350

Purchase of:

U.S. Treasury, government sponsored entities and other investment securities

available for sale

(262,500

)

(500,000

)

Premises and equipment

(6,284

)

(9,013

)

Federal Home Loan Bank stock

(8,293

)

-

Originations of loans held for investment (net of refinances of $120,006 for the

six months ended June 30, 2008 and $450,263 for the six months ended

June 30, 2007)

(1,131,169

)

(884,248

)

Principal payments on loans held for investment and mortgage-backed securities

available for sale

845,692

2,600,061

Net change in undisbursed loan funds

(18,376

)

(30,407

)

Investments in real estate held for investment

(6,566

)

(4,879

)

Other, net

2,113

1,176


Net cash provided by investing activities

$

305,136

$

1,479,634


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 4
Navigation Links

DOWNEY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)

Six Months Ended June 30,

June 30,


(In Thousands)

2008

2007


Cash flows from financing activities

Net decrease in deposits

$

(615,063

)

$

(538,063

)

Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings

7,276,848

8,931,573

Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings

(6,854,900

)

(9,853,000

)

Cash dividends

(6,684

)

(6,684

)

Other, net

3,922

2,679


Net cash used for financing activities

(195,877

)

(1,463,495

)


Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

3,392

24,442

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

89,740

124,866


Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$

93,132

$

149,308


Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

Cash paid during the period for:

Interest

$

210,887

$

291,738

Income taxes

3,636

178,968

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing:

Loans transferred to held for investment from held for sale

2,923

19,042

Loans transferred from held for investment to held for sale

1,723

2,151

Real estate acquired in settlement of loans

257,406

30,178

Loans to facilitate the sale of real estate acquired in settlement of loans

2,876

285


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 5
Navigation Links

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE (1) – Basis of Financial Statement Presentation

          In the opinion of Downey Financial Corp. and subsidiaries (“Downey,” “we,” “us” and “our”), the accompanying consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals unless otherwise disclosed in this Form 10-Q) necessary for a fair presentation of Downey’s financial condition as of June 30, 2008, December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2007, the results of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, and changes in cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

          The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial statements and are in compliance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial condition, results of operations, comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows. The information under the heading Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations presumes that the interim consolidated financial statements will be read in conjunction with Downey’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, which contains among other things, a description of the business, the latest audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, together with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as of December 31, 2007 and for the year then ended. Therefore, only material changes in financial condition and results of operations are discussed in the remainder of Part I.

NOTE (2) – Mortgage Servicing Rights (“MSRs”)

          Effective January 1, 2008, Downey adopted the fair value provision of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets – an amendment of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement No. 140 (“SFAS 156”) and remeasured its mortgage servicing rights ("MSRs") at fair value. Downey recorded a pretax adjustment to increase MSRs by $1.5 million and a corresponding cumulative effect adjustment of $0.9 million, after tax, to increase the 2008 beginning balance of retained earnings in stockholders’ equity. The following table shows the adjustment recorded to the opening balance of MSRs, income taxes, and retained earnings for the remeasurement of Downey’s MSRs at fair value.

(Dollars in Thousands)

MSRs

Deferred Tax Asset

Retained Earnings


Balance at December 31, 2007

$

19,512

$

122,086

$

1,254,367

Remeasurement of MSRs upon adoption of SFAS 156

1,543

(651

)

892


Balance at January 1, 2008

$

21,055

$

121,435

$

1,255,259


Page 6
Navigation Links

          The following table summarizes the activity in MSRs using the fair value method and, prior to 2008, using the amortized cost method for the periods indicated.

Three Months Ended


June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(Dollars in Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Balance at beginning of period

$

19,425

$

21,973

$

22,114

$

21,707

$

20,871

Remeasurement of mortgage servicing rights

to fair value (a)

-

(918

)

-

-

-


Adjusted balance at beginning of period

19,425

21,055

22,114

21,707

20,871

Additions (b)

1,557

1,122

945

1,394

1,926

Amortization

-

-

(1,085

)

(950

)

(967

)

Sales

-

(262

)

-

-

-

Impairment write-down

-

-

(1

)

(37

)

(123

)

Changes in fair value due to:

Changes in valuation model inputs or

assumptions (c)

3,325

(1,751

)

-

-

-

Other changes (d)

(749

)

(739

)

-

-

-


Balance at end of period

23,558

19,425

21,973

22,114

21,707


Allowance balance at beginning of period

-

2,461

265

88

182

Remeasurement of mortgage servicing rights

to fair value (a)

-

(2,461

)

-

-

-


Adjusted balance at beginning of period

-

-

265

88

182

Provision for impairment

-

-

2,197

214

29

Impairment write-down

-

-

(1

)

(37

)

(123

)


Allowance balance at end of period

-

-

2,461

265

88


Total mortgage servicing rights, net

$

23,558

$

19,425

$

19,512

$

21,849

$

21,619


As a percentage of associated mortgage loans

0.95

%

0.80

%

0.80

%

0.90

%

0.91

%

Fair value (e)

$

23,558

$

19,425

$

20,991

$

23,935

$

25,080

Weighted average expected life (in months)

69

50

53

69

65

Custodial account earnings rate

3.75

%

3.72

%

4.53

%

4.57

%

5.35

%

Weighted average discount rate

11.78

11.47

11.45

11.63

10.13


At period end

Mortgage loans serviced for others:

Total

$

5,435,529

$

5,431,475

$

5,525,357

$

5,622,331

$

6,002,907

With capitalized mortgage servicing rights:(e)

Amount

2,471,000

2,428,098

2,436,278

2,419,432

2,383,290

Weighted average interest rate

5.87

%

5.88

%

5.88

%

5.83

%

5.79

%

Total loans sub-serviced without mortgage

servicing rights: (f)

Term – less than six months

$

103,972

$

69,810

$

81,123

$

76,870

$

398,530

Term – indefinite

2,857,191

2,933,567

2,995,119

3,112,895

3,207,087


Custodial account balances

$

67,710

$

71,479

$

81,778

$

84,819

$

156,433


(a) Effective January 1, 2008, Downey adopted the fair value provision of SFAS 156 and remeasured its MSRs at fair value. Downey recorded a pretax adjustment to increase MSRs by $1.5 million and a corresponding cumulative effect adjustment of $0.9 million, after tax, to increase the 2008 beginning balance of retained earnings in stockholders’ equity.
(b) Included minor amounts repurchased.
(c) Reflects changes in assumptions for such items as discount rates and prepayment speeds.
(d) Represents changes due to realization of expected cash flows over time.
(e) Excludes loans sub-serviced without capitalized mortgage servicing rights. The estimated fair values for periods presented prior to 2008 may exceed book value for certain asset strata and excluded loans sold or securitized prior to 1996.
(f) Servicing is performed for a fixed fee per loan each month.
Page 7
Navigation Links

          The following table summarizes the activity in MSRs and its related allowance for the year-to-date periods indicated.

Six Months Ended June 30,


(Dollars in Thousands)

2008

2007


Gross balance at beginning of period

$

21,973

$

21,435

Remeasurement of mortgage servicing rights to fair value (a)

(918)

-


Adjusted balance at beginning of period

21,055

21,435

Additions (b)

2,679

3,267

Amortization

-

(1,991

)

Sales

(262

)

(868

)

Impairment write-down

-

(136

)

Changes in fair value due to:

Changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions (c)

1,574

-

Other changes (d)

(1,488

)

-


Balance at end of period

23,558

21,707


Allowance balance at beginning of period

2,461

239

Remeasurement of mortgage servicing rights to fair value (a)

(2,461

)

-


Adjusted balance at beginning of period

-

239

Reduction of impairment

-

(15

)

Impairment write-down

-

(136

)


Allowance balance at end of period

-

88


Total mortgage servicing rights, net

$

23,558

$

21,619


(a) Effective January 1, 2008, Downey adopted the fair value provision of SFAS 156 and remeasured its MSRs at fair value. Downey recorded a pretax adjustment to increase MSRs by $1.5 million and a corresponding cumulative effect adjustment of $0.9 million, after tax, to increase the 2008 beginning balance of retained earnings in stockholders’ equity.
(b) Included minor amounts repurchased.
(c) Reflects changes in assumptions for such items as discount rates and prepayment speeds.
(d) Represents changes due to realization of expected cash flows over time.

          Upon adoption in 2008 of the fair value provision of SFAS 156, Downey capitalizes MSRs at fair value for residential one-to-four unit mortgage loans we originate and sell with servicing rights retained or acquired through purchase. Downey discloses MSRs associated with the origination and sale of loans in the financial statements as a component of the net gains on sales of loans and mortgage-backed securities. MSR fair value adjustments are recorded as a component of loan servicing income (loss), net. Prior to 2008, Downey capitalized MSRs at fair value except for those acquired through purchase, which were recorded at the lower of cost or fair value. MSRs were amortized over the estimated servicing period with impairment losses recorded through a valuation allowance with both the associated provisions and amortization recorded as a component of loan servicing income (loss), net category.

           Downey’s loan servicing portfolio normally increases in value as interest rates rise and loan prepayments decrease and declines in value as interest rates fall and loan prepayments increase. The change in fair value for MSRs reflects changes in assumptions and changes due to the realization of expected cash flows over time. Key assumptions used to determine the fair value of MSRs, which vary due to changes in market interest rates, include: expected prepayment speeds, which impact the average life of the portfolio; the earnings rate on custodial accounts, which impacts the value of custodial accounts; expected delinquencies and losses, which impact the servicing income (loss); and the discount rate used in valuing future cash flows. Once a quarter, Downey conducts model validation procedures by obtaining three independent broker results for the fair value of MSRs and compares them to the results of its MSR model.

          Prior to 2008, under the amortization method of recording MSRs, impairment was measured on a disaggregated basis based upon the predominant risk characteristics of the underlying mortgage loans, which include loans by loan term and coupon rate (stratified in 50 basis point increments). Impairment losses were recognized through a valuation allowance for each impaired stratum. Certain strata may have impairment, while other strata may not. Therefore, changes in overall fair value may not equal provisions for or reductions of the valuation allowance.

Page 8
Navigation Links

          The following table summarizes the estimated changes in the fair value of MSRs for changes in those assumptions individually and in combination associated with an immediate 100 basis point increase or decrease in market rates. The sensitivity analysis in the table below is hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on a 100 basis point variation in assumptions generally cannot be easily extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the assumptions to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect that a change in a particular assumption may have on the fair value is calculated without changing any other assumptions. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

Expected

Custodial

Prepayment

Accounts

Discount

(Dollars in Thousands)

Speeds

Rate

Rate

Combination


Increase rates 100 basis points: (a)

Increase (decrease) in fair value

$

2,535

$

1,377

$

(635

)

$

2,610

Decrease rates 100 basis points: (b)

Increase (decrease) in fair value

(7,371

)

(1,491

)

621

(8,388

)


(a) The weighted-average expected life of the MSRs portfolio becomes 83 months.
(b) The weighted-average expected life of the MSRs portfolio becomes 36 months.

          The following table presents a breakdown of the components of loan servicing income (loss), net included in Downey’s results of operations for the periods indicated.

Three Months Ended


June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(In Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Net cash servicing fees

$

1,750

$

1,765

$

2,166

$

1,657

$

1,598

Payoff and curtailment interest cost (a)

(350

)

(471

)

(544

)

(787

)

(1,391

)

Change in fair value of mortgage servicing

rights due to:(b)

Changes in valuation model inputs or

assumptions (c)

3,325

(1,751

)

-

-

-

Other changes (d)

(749

)

(739

)

-

-

-

Amortization of mortgage servicing rights

-

-

(1,085

)

(950

)

(967

)

Provision for impairment of mortgage

servicing rights

-

-

(2,197

)

(214

)

(29

)


Total loan servicing income (loss), net

$

3,976

$

(1,196

)

$

(1,660

)

$

(294

)

$

(789

)


(a) Represents the difference between the contractual obligation to pay interest to the investor for an entire month and the actual interest received when a loan prepays prior to the end of the month. However, loan servicing income (loss), net does not reflect interest income derived from the use of loan repayments which is included in net interest income.
(b) Effective January 1, 2008, Downey adopted the fair value provision of SFAS 156 and remeasured its MSRs at fair value. Downey recorded a pretax adjustment to increase MSRs by $1.5 million and a corresponding cumulative effect adjustment of $0.9 million, after tax, to increase the 2008 beginning balance of retained earnings in stockholders’ equity.
(c) Reflects changes in assumptions for such items as discount rates and prepayment speeds.
(d) Represents changes due to realization of expected cash flows over time.
Page 9
Navigation Links

          The following table presents a breakdown of the components of loan servicing income (loss), net included in Downey’s results of operations for the year-to-date periods indicated.

Six Months Ended June 30,


(In Thousands)

2008

2007


Net cash servicing fees

$

3,515

$

3,205

Payoff and curtailment interest cost (a)

(821

)

(2,454

)

Change in fair value of mortgage servicing rights due to:(b)

Changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions (c)

1,574

-

Other changes (d)

(1,488

)

-

Amortization of mortgage servicing rights

-

(1,991

)

Reduction of impairment of mortgage servicing rights

-

15


Total loan servicing income (loss), net

$

2,780

$

(1,225

)


(a) Represents the difference between the contractual obligation to pay interest to the investor for an entire month and the actual interest received when a loan prepays prior to the end of the month. However, loan servicing income (loss), net does not reflect interest income derived from the use of loan repayments which is included in net interest income.
(b) Effective January 1, 2008, Downey adopted the fair value provision of SFAS 156 and remeasured its MSRs at fair value. Downey recorded a pretax adjustment to increase MSRs by $1.5 million and a corresponding cumulative effect adjustment of $0.9 million, after tax, to increase the 2008 beginning balance of retained earnings in stockholders’ equity.
(c) Reflects changes in assumptions for such items as discount rates and prepayment speeds.
(d) Represents changes due to realization of expected cash flows over time.

NOTE (3) – Derivatives, Hedging Activities, Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk and Other Contractual Obligations (Risk Management)

Derivatives

          Downey offers short-term interest rate lock commitments to help attract potential home loan borrowers. The commitments guarantee a specified interest rate for a loan if underwriting standards are met, but do not obligate the potential borrower. Accordingly, some commitments never become loans and merely expire. The residential one-to-four unit interest rate lock commitments Downey ultimately expects to result in loans and sell in the secondary market are treated as derivatives. Consequently, as derivatives, the hedging of the interest rate lock commitments does not qualify for hedge accounting. Effective January 1, 2008, Downey adopted the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 109, Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings, that specifically states the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of a loan should be included in the measurement of all written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. Associated fair value adjustments to the notional amount of interest rate lock commitments and, beginning in 2008, the associated MSRs are recorded in current earnings under net gains on sales of loans and mortgage-backed securities with an offset to the balance sheet in either other assets, or accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Fair values for the notional amount of interest rate lock commitments are based on dealer quoted market prices acquired from third parties. Fair values for the associated MSRs are determined by computing the present value of the expected net servicing income from the portfolio by strata, determined by key characteristics of the underlying loans, primarily coupon interest rate and whether the loans have a fixed or variable rate. The carrying amount of loans held for sale includes a basis adjustment to the loan balance at funding resulting from the change in fair value of the interest rate lock derivative and, beginning in 2008, the associated MSRs from the date of rate lock to the date of funding. At June 30, 2008, Downey had a notional amount of interest rate lock commitments identified to sell as part of its secondary marketing activities of $54 million, with a change in fair value resulting in a recorded gain of $0.7 million.

          Downey does not generally enter into derivative transactions for purely speculative purposes.

Derivative Hedging Activities

          As part of its secondary marketing activities, Downey typically utilizes short-term loan forward sale and purchase contracts—derivatives—that mature in less than one year to offset the impact of changes in market interest rates on the value of residential one-to-four unit interest rate lock commitments and loans held for sale. In general, interest rate lock commitments associated with fixed rate loans require a higher percentage of loan forward sale contracts to mitigate interest rate risk than those associated with adjustable rate loans. Contracts designated as hedges for the forecasted sale of loans from the held for sale portfolio are accounted for as cash flow hedges because these contracts have a high correlation to the price movement of the loans being hedged (within a range of 80% - 125%). The measurement approach for determining the ineffective aspects of the hedge is established at the inception of the hedge. Changes in fair value of the notional amount of loan forward sale contracts not designated as cash flow hedges and the ineffectiveness of hedge transactions are recorded in net gains on sales of loans and mortgage-backed securities. Changes in expected future cash flows related to the fair value of

Page 10
Navigation Links

the notional amount of loan forward sale contracts designated as cash flow hedges for the forecasted sale of loans held for sale are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, provided cash flow hedge requirements are met. The offset to these changes are recorded in the balance sheet as either other assets, or accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) will be recognized in the income statement when the hedged forecasted transactions impact earnings. Downey estimates that all of the related unrealized gains or losses in accumulated other comprehensive income will be reclassified into earnings within the next three months. Fair values for the notional amount of loan forward sale contracts are based on dealer quoted market prices acquired from third parties. At June 30, 2008, the notional amount of loan forward sale contracts amounted to $130 million, with a change in fair value resulting in a gain of $0.8 million, of which $72 million were designated as cash flow hedges. The notional amount of loan forward purchase contracts at June 30, 2008 amounted to $4 million, with less than $0.1 million change in fair value.

          Downey has not discontinued any designated derivative instruments associated with loans held for sale due to a change in the probability of settling a forecasted transaction.

          In connection with its interest rate risk management, Downey from time to time enters into interest rate exchange agreements (“swap contracts”) with certain national investment banking firms or the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (“FHLB”) under terms that provide mutual payment of interest on the outstanding notional amount of swap contracts. These swap contracts help Downey manage the effects of adverse changes in interest rates on net interest income. Downey has interest rate swap contracts on which it pays variable interest based on the 3-month London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) while receiving fixed interest. The swaps were designated as a hedge against changes in the fair value of certain FHLB fixed rate advances due to changes in market interest rates. The payment and maturity dates of the swap contracts match those of the advances. This hedge effectively converts fixed interest rate advances into debt that adjusts quarterly to movements in 3-month LIBOR. Because the terms of the swap contracts match those of the advances, the hedge has no ineffectiveness and results are reported in interest expense. The fair value of interest rate swap contracts is based on dealer quoted market prices acquired from third parties and represents the estimated amount Downey would receive or pay upon terminating the contracts, taking into consideration current interest rates and the remaining contract terms. The fair value of the swap contracts is recorded on the balance sheet in either other assets or accounts payable and accrued liabilities. With no ineffectiveness, the recorded swap contract values will essentially act as fair value adjustments to the advances being hedged. At June 30, 2008, swap contracts with a notional amount totaling $430 million were outstanding and had a fair value gain of $0.4 million recorded on the balance sheet in other assets and as an increase to the advances being hedged.

          The following table summarizes Downey’s interest rate swap contracts at June 30, 2008.

Weighted

Notional

Average

(Dollars in Thousands)

Amount

Interest Rate

Term


Pay – Variable (3-month LIBOR)

$

(100,000

)

2.68

%

March 2004 – October 2008

Receive – Fixed

100,000

3.20

Pay – Variable (3-month LIBOR)

(130,000

)

2.68

March 2004 – October 2008

Receive – Fixed

130,000

3.21

Pay – Variable (3-month LIBOR)

(100,000

)

2.68

March 2004 – November 2008

Receive – Fixed

100,000

3.26

Pay – Variable (3-month LIBOR)

(100,000

)

2.68

March 2004 – November 2008

Receive – Fixed

100,000

3.27


Page 11
Navigation Links

          The following table shows the impact from non-qualifying hedges and the ineffectiveness of cash flow hedges on net gains (losses) on sales of loans and mortgage-backed securities (i.e., SFAS 133 effect), as well as the impact to other comprehensive income (loss) from qualifying cash flow transactions for the periods indicated. Also shown are the notional amounts or balances for Downey’s non-qualifying and qualifying hedge transactions.

Three Months Ended


June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(In Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Net gains (losses) on non-qualifying hedge transactions

$

2,099

$

(69

)

$

(460

)

$

(553

)

$

866

Net gains on qualifying cash flow hedge transactions:

Unrealized hedge ineffectiveness

-

-

-

-

-

Less reclassification of realized hedge ineffectiveness

-

-

-

-

-


Total net gains (losses) recognized in sales of loans and

mortgage-backed securities (SFAS 133 effect)

2,099

(69

)

(460

)

(553

)

866

Other comprehensive income (loss)

593

(606

)

(101

)

(189

)

(86

)


Notional amount or balance at period end

Non-qualifying hedge transactions:

Interest rate lock commitments (a)

$

54,095

$

78,131

$

53,250

$

92,742

$

122,668

Associated loan forward sale contracts

57,837

94,676

57,924

94,567

126,675

Associated loan forward purchase contracts

4,000

13,000

-

10,000

-

Qualifying cash flow hedge transactions:

Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value

85,558

109,253

103,384

90,228

187,752

Associated loan forward sale contracts

72,163

96,868

93,576

77,433

175,825

Qualifying fair value hedge transactions:

Designated FHLB advances – pay-fixed

430,000

430,000

430,000

430,000

430,000

Associated interest rate swap contracts –

pay-variable, receive-fixed

430,000

430,000

430,000

430,000

430,000


(a) Amount represents the notional amount of the commitments or contracts reduced by an anticipated fallout factor for those commitments not expected to fund. The notional amount for interest rate lock commitments before the reduction of expected fallout was $78 million.

          The following table shows the impact from non-qualifying hedges and the ineffectiveness of cash flow hedges on net gains (losses) on sales of loans and mortgage-backed securities (i.e., SFAS 133 effect), as well as the impact to other comprehensive income (loss) from qualifying cash flow transactions for the year-to-date periods indicated.

Six Months Ended June 30,


(In Thousands)

2008

2007


Net gains on non-qualifying hedge transactions

$

2,030

$

1,117

Net gains on qualifying cash flow hedge transactions:

Unrealized hedge ineffectiveness

-

-

Less reclassification of realized hedge ineffectiveness

-

-


Total net gains recognized in sales of loans and

mortgage-backed securities (SFAS 133 effect)

2,030

1,117

Other comprehensive loss

(13

)

(146

)


          These loan forward sale and swap contracts expose Downey to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the other parties—primarily government-sponsored enterprises such as Federal National Mortgage Association, securities firms and the FHLB. This risk consists primarily of the termination value of agreements where Downey is in an unfavorable position. Downey manages the credit risk associated with its other parties to the various derivative agreements through credit review, exposure limits and monitoring procedures. Downey does not anticipate nonperformance by the other parties.

Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk

          Downey utilizes financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers and to reduce its own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. These financial instruments include commitments to originate fixed and variable rate mortgage loans held for investment, undisbursed loan funds, lines and letters of credit, commitments to purchase loans and mortgage-backed securities for portfolio and commitments to invest in community development funds. The contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement Downey has in particular classes of financial instruments.

Page 12
Navigation Links

          Commitments to originate fixed and variable rate mortgage loans held for investment are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the commitment. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since some commitments expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Undisbursed loan funds on construction projects and unused lines of credit on home equity and commercial loans include committed funds not disbursed. Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by Downey to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Downey also enters into commitments to purchase loans and mortgage-backed securities, investment securities and to invest in community development funds.

          The following is a summary of commitments with off-balance sheet risk at the dates indicated.

June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(In Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Commitments to originate adjustable rate loans

held for investment

$

362,317

$

524,978

$

196,471

$

211,277

$

138,510

Undisbursed loan funds and unused lines of credit

277,757

265,493

306,532

310,677

316,931


          Downey uses the same credit policies in making commitments to originate loans held for investment and lines and letters of credit as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. For commitments to originate loans held for investment, the commitment amounts represent exposure to loss from market fluctuations as well as credit loss. In regard to these commitments, adverse changes from market fluctuations are generally not hedged. Downey manages the credit risk of its commitments to originate loans held for investment through credit approvals, limits and monitoring procedures. The credit risk involved in issuing lines and letters of credit requires the same creditworthiness evaluation as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. Downey evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness.

          Downey receives collateral to support commitments when deemed necessary. The most significant categories of collateral include real estate properties underlying mortgage loans, liens on personal property and cash on deposit with Downey.

          Downey maintains an allowance for losses to provide for inherent losses for loan-related commitments associated with undisbursed loan funds and unused lines of credit. The allowance for losses on loan-related commitments was $1 million at June 30, 2008, December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2007.

Other Contractual Obligations

          Downey sells all loans without recourse. When a loan sold to an investor without recourse fails to perform according to the contractual terms of the note, the investor will typically review the loan file to determine whether defects in the origination process occurred and whether such defects give rise to a violation of a representation or warranty made to the investor in connection with the sale. If such a defect is identified, Downey may be required to either repurchase the loan or indemnify the investor for losses sustained. If there are no such defects, Downey has no commitment to repurchase the loan. During the first six months of 2008, Downey recorded repurchase or indemnification losses related to defects in the origination process of $0.2 million and repurchased $2 million of loans and $1 million of real estate acquired in settlement of loans.

          The loan and servicing sale contracts may also contain provisions to refund sales price premiums to the purchaser if the related loans prepay during a period of typically 90 days, but never more than 120 days, from the sale’s settlement date. Downey reserved less than $1 million at June 30, 2008, December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2007 to cover the estimated loss exposure related to early payoffs. However, if all the loans related to those sales prepaid within the refund period, as of June 30, 2008, Downey’s maximum sales price premium refund would be $1.4 million.

          Through the normal course of operations, Downey has entered into certain contractual obligations. Downey’s obligations generally relate to the funding of operations through deposits and borrowings, loan servicing, as well as leases for premises and equipment. Downey has obligations under long-term operating leases, principally for building space and land. Lease terms generally cover a five-year period, with options to extend, and are non-cancelable. Downey also has vendor contractual relationships, but the contracts are not considered to be material.

Page 13
Navigation Links

          At June 30, 2008, scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit, FHLB advances and other borrowings, senior notes and future operating minimum lease commitments were as follows:

After 1

After 3

Within

Through 3

Through 5

Beyond

Total

(In Thousands)

1 Year

Years

Years

5 Years

Balance


Certificates of deposit

$

7,280,647

$

213,906

$

90,243

$

-

$

7,584,796

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

97,838

-

-

-

97,838

FHLB advances

1,200,034

200,000

125,000

-

1,525,034

Senior notes

-

-

-

198,543

198,543

Operating leases

5,531

7,778

2,702

437

16,448


Total other contractual obligations

$

8,584,050

$

421,684

$

217,945

$

198,980

$

9,422,659


Litigation

          On October 29, 2004, two former traditional branch employees brought an action in Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC323796, entitled Margie Holman and Alice A. Mesec, et al. v. Downey Savings and Loan Association. The first amended complaint seeks unspecified damages for alleged unpaid regular and overtime wages, inadequate meal breaks, failure to pay split-shift and reporting time wages, and related claims. The plaintiffs are seeking class action status to represent all other current and former Downey Savings and Loan Association, F.A. (“Bank”) employees who held the position of Customer Service Supervisor and/or Customer Service Representative at the Bank’s in-store branches at any time from October 29, 2000 to date. The Bank has opposed the claim and asserted all appropriate defenses, and has provided for what is believed to be a reasonable estimate of exposure for this matter in the event of loss. While acknowledging the uncertainties of litigation, management believes that the ultimate outcome of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on Downey’s operations, cash flows or financial position.

          Two purported shareholder class actions, one brought on behalf of Waterford Township General Employees Retirement System, Case No. CV-08-03261, and the other brought on behalf of Stephen J. Mihalacki, Case No. SACV08-00609, were filed on May 16, 2008 and June 2, 2008, respectively, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against Downey Financial Corp. (“Holding Company”) and certain of its current and former officers and certain former directors. The complaints, filed on behalf of all persons who purchased Holding Company common stock during October 16, 2006 to March 14, 2008, seek unspecified damages for alleged violation of federal securities laws, claiming that the defendants made misleading statements and omissions regarding Downey’s business and financial results, thereby artificially inflating the common stock price. Specifically, the plaintiffs contend that the defendants concealed that (a) the Bank’s portfolio of option ARMs contained millions of dollars worth of impaired and risky securities; (b) the Bank had been aggressive in acquiring loans from mortgage brokers that were highly risky; (c) the Bank had failed to properly account for highly leveraged loans; (d) the Bank had inadequate underwriting practices, which led to large numbers of loan defaults; and (e) the Bank had not adequately reserved for option ARM loans. A motion to consolidate the two actions is pending, after which it is expected that the plaintiffs will file a consolidated complaint.

          Related to the shareholder class actions, two purported shareholder derivative lawsuits, one entitled Michael L. McDougall v. Daniel D. Rosenthal, et al., Case No. 30-2008-00180029, and the other entitled Joyce Mendlin v. Maurice L. McAlister, et al., Case No. 30-2008-00087854, were filed on June 10, 2008 and July 28, 2008, respectively, in Orange County Superior Court, in California. The plaintiffs, who purport to bring the lawsuits on behalf of the Holding Company against certain of its current and former officers, its current directors and certain former directors, allege that commencing in October 2006, the defendants caused or allowed Downey to issue a series of press releases and other statements that significantly overstated Downey’s business prospects and financial results; that the statements failed to disclose that Downey was more exposed to the subprime market crisis than it had disclosed; that Downey’s portfolio of subprime and option ARM mortgage-related assets was overvalued; and that as a result, Downey’s reported earnings and business prospects were inaccurate. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants’ action constitutes breaches of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment, and seek, among other relief, unspecified damages to be paid to the Holding Company, corporate governance reforms, and equitable and injunctive relief, including restitution and the creation of a constructive trust.

          Downey has been named as a defendant in other legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, none of which, in the opinion of management, will have a material adverse effect on its operations, cash flows or financial position.

Page 14
Navigation Links

NOTE (4) – Income Taxes

          FASB Interpretation 48: Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes requires the affirmative evaluation that it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits of a tax position, that an enterprise is entitled to economic benefits resulting from positions taken in income tax returns. If a tax position does not meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the benefit of that position is not recognized in the financial statements. Management has determined that there are no unrecognized tax benefits to be reported in Downey’s financial statements, and none are anticipated during the next 12 months.

          During the quarter, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) completed its examination of Downey’s tax returns for 2003, 2004 and 2005. Tax years subsequent to 2005 remain subject to federal examination, while state tax returns for years subsequent to 2002 are subject to examination by taxing authorities. During 2007, Downey determined that its treatment of certain loan origination costs for the years under examination was improper and filed amended tax returns for those years and paid tax and interest to federal and state taxing authorities in the amount of $144.7 million to resolve this issue. When applicable, Downey classifies interest (net of tax) and penalties on the underpayment of taxes as income tax expense.

          SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, requires that when determining the need for a valuation allowance against a deferred tax asset, management must assess both positive and negative evidence with regard to the realizability of the tax losses represented by that asset. To the extent available sources of taxable income are insufficient to absorb tax losses, a valuation allowance is necessary. Sources of taxable income for this analysis include prior years’ tax returns, the expected reversals of taxable temporary differences between book and tax income, prudent and feasible tax-planning strategies, and future taxable income.

          Downey has recorded a valuation allowance of $182.8 million against its deferred tax asset of $239.9 million as of June 30, 2008, after considering all available evidence and potential tax-planning strategies related to the amount of the tax asset that is more likely than not to be realized.

          Downey’s deferred tax asset resulted from a significant increase in its loan loss allowance. To the extent the loan loss allowance is not allocable to specific loans, it represents future tax benefits which would be realized when actual charge-offs are made against the allowance. Given Downey’s recent operating losses, the valuation allowance recorded at June 30, 2008 reduces the deferred tax asset to the amount management deems more likely than not to be realized only through the carry back of tax losses to prior years’ federal tax returns.

          Since generally accepted accounting principles require Downey to spread its expected annual tax benefit across the entire year through an effective tax rate, we expect to continue realizing a tax benefit in future periods, but, as explained above, at much smaller levels than in prior periods.

NOTE (5) – Employee Stock Option Plans

          During 1994, the Bank adopted and Downey’s stockholders approved the Downey Savings and Loan Association 1994 Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”). The LTIP provided for the granting of stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance awards and other awards. The LTIP specified an authorization of 434,110 shares (adjusted for stock dividends and splits) of the Bank’s common stock available for issuance under the LTIP. Effective January 23, 1995, the Holding Company and the Bank executed an amendment to the LTIP by which the Holding Company adopted and ratified the LTIP such that shares of the Holding Company shall be issued upon exercise of options or payment of other awards, for which payment is to be made in stock, in lieu of the Bank’s common stock. The LTIP terminated in 2004; however, options granted and outstanding at termination remain exercisable until the specific termination date of the option. At June 30, 2008, options for 52,914 shares were outstanding, all of which were exercisable at a weighted average option price per share of $25.44, which represented at least the fair market value of such shares on the date the options were granted and expire at December 31, 2008. At June 30, 2008, 381,239 shares of treasury stock existed that may be used to satisfy the exercise of the options or for payment of other awards. No other stock based plan exists.

NOTE (6) – Earnings (Loss) Per Share

          Earnings (loss) per share of common stock is calculated on both a basic and diluted basis based on the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding, excluding common shares in treasury. Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted from the issuance of common stock that then shared in earnings.

Page 15
Navigation Links

          The following table presents a reconciliation of the components used to derive basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods indicated.

Three Months Ended June 30,


2008

2007


Weighted

Weighted

Average

Average

Net

Shares

Per Share

Net

Shares

Per Share

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

Loss

Outstanding

Amount

Income

Outstanding

Amount


Basic earnings (loss) per share

$

(218,919

)

27,853,783

$

(7.86

)

$

32,744

27,853,783

$

1.17

Effect of dilutive stock options (a)

-

-

-

-

30,279

-


Diluted earnings (loss) per share

$

(218,919

)

27,853,783

$

(7.86

)

$

32,744

27,884,062

$

1.17


(a) For the three months ended June 30, 2008, there was no dilutive effect from our 52,914 outstanding stock options.

          The following table presents a reconciliation of the components used to derive basic and diluted earnings per share for the year-to-date periods indicated.

Six Months Ended June 30,


2008

2007


Weighted

Weighted

Average

Average

Net

Shares

Per Share

Net

Shares

Per Share

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

Income

Outstanding

Amount

Income

Outstanding

Amount


Basic earnings (loss) per share

$

(466,616

)

27,853,783

$

(16.75

)

$

75,607

27,853,783

$

2.71

Effect of dilutive stock options (a)

-

-

-

-

30,263

-


Diluted earnings (loss) per share

$

(466,616

)

27,853,783

$

(16.75

)

$

75,607

27,884,046

$

2.71


(a) For the six months ended June 30, 2008, there was no dilutive effect from our 52,914 outstanding stock options.

NOTE (7) – Fair Value of Financial Instruments

          Fair value measurements for Downey’s financial instruments are determined at a specific point in time based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, we have established a fair value hierarchy as required by the FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, ("SFAS 157"). The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of Downey (observable inputs) and (2) Downey’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The notion of unobservable inputs allows for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. Because no active market exists for a portion of Downey’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are subjective in nature. Additionally, the fair value estimates do not necessarily reflect the price Downey might receive if it were to sell at one time its entire holding of a particular financial instrument.

          Fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The highest priority (Level 1 inputs) is for quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, the next priority (Level 2 inputs) is for other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, and the lowest priority (Level 3 inputs) is for unobservable inputs. In some cases, the inputs used to measure fair value might fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Assessing the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment considering factors specific to the asset or liability and could significantly affect the fair value estimate.

Page 16
Navigation Links

          Downey’s valuation techniques used to measure fair value are as follows:

          The following table presents for each of these hierarchy levels, Downey’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at the date indicated.

June 30,

(In Thousands)

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

2008


U.S. Treasury, government sponsored entities and other

investment securities, available for sale

$

998,396

$

-

$

61

$

998,457

Mortgage-backed securities available for sale

-

-

106

106

Mortgage servicing rights

-

-

23,558

23,558

Net derivative assets (liabilities)

-

1,200

654

1,854


Total

$

998,396

$

1,200

$

24,379

$

1,023,975


          The following table summarizes the activity in the Level 3 fair value category for the year-to-date period indicated.

Net Unrealized

Gains/(Losses)

Net

At

Gains/(Losses)

In Other

Purchases

Transfers

At

Net

December 31,

In Net

Comprehensive

Sales and

In/out of

June 30,

Unrealized

(In Thousands)

2007

Income (a)

Income

Settlements

Level 3

2008

Gains/(Losses)


U.S. Treasury, government sponsored

entities and other investment

securities, available for sale

$

61

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

61

$

-

Mortgage-backed securities

available for sale

111

-

-

(5

)

-

106

-

Mortgage servicing rights

19,512

5,796

-

(1,750

)

-

23,558

1,574

Net derivative assets (liabilities)

198

456

-

-

-

654

654


Total

$

19,882

$

6,252

$

-

$

(1,755

)

$

-

$

24,379

$

2,228


(a) Effective January 1, 2008, Downey adopted the fair value provision of SFAS 156 and remeasured its MSRs at fair value. Downey recorded a pretax adjustment to increase MSRs by $1.5 million and a corresponding cumulative effect adjustment of $0.9 million, after tax, to increase the 2008 beginning balance of retained earnings in stockholders’ equity. Amount in Net Unrealized Gains/(Losses) column excludes changes in fair value due to changes from the realization of expected cash flows over time.

          Also, we may be required, from time to time, to measure certain other financial assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles. The adjustments to fair value usually result from application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

          The following table provides a level of valuation assumptions used to determine each adjustment and the carrying value of assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at the date and for the period indicated.

Gains/(Losses)

for the Six

Months Ended

At

June 30,

(In Thousands)

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

June 30,

2008


Loans held for investment

$

-

$

$

10,789

$

10,789

$

(388

)

Real estate acquired in settlement of loans (a)

-

-

261,536

261,536

(35,569

)

Investment in real estate and joint ventures

-

27,024

27,024

(655

)


Total

$

-

$

-

$

299,349

$

299,349

$

(36,612

)


(a) Amount at June 30, 2008 is net of an $18 million valuation allowance related to Downey’s single family residential properties which reflects recent loss experience from sales compared to their fair value prior to sale.
Page 17
Navigation Links

NOTE (8) – Business Segment Reporting

          The following table presents the operating results and selected financial data by business segments for the periods indicated.

Real Estate

(In Thousands)

Banking

Investment

Elimination

Totals


Three months ended June 30, 2008

Net interest income

$

82,866

$

65

$

-

$

82,931

Provision for credit losses

258,874

-

-

258,874

Other income (loss)

17,224

(5,159

)

-

12,065

Operating expense

88,207

319

-

88,526

Net intercompany income (expense)

22

(22

)

-

-


Loss before income tax benefits

(246,969

)

(5,435

)

-

(252,404

)

Income tax benefits

(31,262

)

(2,223

)

-

(33,485

)


Net loss

$

(215,707

)

$

(3,212

)

$

-

$

(218,919

)


At June 30, 2008

Assets:

Loans and mortgage-backed securities, net

$

10,716,676

$

-

$

-

$

10,716,676

Investments in real estate and joint ventures

-

63,182

-

63,182

Other

1,902,632

8,224

(58,395

)

1,852,461


Total assets

12,619,308

71,406

(58,395

)

12,632,319


Equity

$

858,937

$

58,395

$

(58,395

)

$

858,937


Three months ended June 30, 2007

Net interest income

$

111,097

$

362

$

-

$

111,459

Provision of credit losses

9,505

-

-

9,505

Other income

17,368

157

-

17,525

Operating expense

62,060

300

-

62,360

Net intercompany income (expense)

19

(19

)

-

-


Income before income taxes

56,919

200

-

57,119

Income taxes

24,305

70

-

24,375


Net income

$

32,614

$

130

$

-

$

32,744


At June 30, 2007

Assets:

Loans and mortgage-backed securities, net

$

12,392,066

$

-

$

-

$

12,392,066

Investments in real estate and joint ventures

-

64,997

-

64,997

Other

2,496,685

27,341

(78,119

)

2,445,907


Total assets

14,888,751

92,338

(78,119

)

14,902,970


Equity

$

1,464,473

$

78,119

$

(78,119

)

$

1,464,473


Real Estate

(In Thousands)

Banking

Investment

Elimination

Totals


Six months ended June 30, 2008

Net interest income

$

166,467

$

189

$

-

$

166,656

Provision for loan losses

495,744

-

-

495,744

Other income (loss)

26,663

(5,660

)

-

21,003

Operating expense

176,879

638

-

177,517

Net intercompany income (expense)

68

(68

)

-

-


Loss before income tax benefits

(479,425

)

(6,177

)

-

(485,602

)

Income tax benefits

(16,460

)

(2,526

)

-

(18,986

)


Net loss

$

(462,965

)

$

(3,651

)

$

-

$

(466,616

)


Six months ended June 30, 2007

Net interest income

$

235,849

$

724

$

-

$

236,573

Provision for loan losses

10,122

-

-

10,122

Other income

34,300

913

-

35,213

Operating expense

127,335

668

-

128,003

Net intercompany income (expense)

31

(31

)

-

-


Income before income taxes

132,723

938

-

133,661

Income taxes

57,686

368

-

58,054


Net income

$

75,037

$

570

$

-

$

75,607


Page 18
Navigation Links

NOTE (9) – Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161

          In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 161”). This standard is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. Downey is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that this statement will have on its disclosures related to hedging activities.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 162

          In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, (“SFAS 162”). This standard is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying the sources of accounting principles and a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP for nongovernmental entities. SFAS 162 will be effective 60 days after the U.S. Securities and Commission approves the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” Adoption of SFAS 162 is not expected to have a material impact on Downey.

NOTE (10) – Subsequent Events

          On July 25, 2008, following Downey’s second quarter earnings release on July 24, 2008, Moody’s Investors Service downgraded the Holding Company’s senior unsecured debt rating to “B1” from “Ba1.” In addition, the Bank’s financial strength was downgraded to “D” from the previous rating of a “D+,” long-term deposit rating to “Ba2” from “Baa3” and short-term deposits to “Not Prime” from “Prime-3,” with the ratings of both the Holding Company and the Bank under review for downgrade. On July 26, 2008, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services lowered its senior unsecured and counterparty credit rating on the Holding Company to “BB+/B” from “BBB-/A-3.” In addition, the Bank’s counterparty and deposit ratings were lowered to “BBB-/A-3” from “BBB/A-2,” with the ratings of both the Holding Company and the Bank on negative watch. These lower ratings, and any further ratings downgrades, could make it more difficult for the Holding Company and the Bank to access the capital markets going forward, as the cost to borrow or raise capital would most likely become more expensive. The cost of the Bank’s primary funding sources (deposits and FHLB borrowings) is not influenced directly by the Bank’s credit ratings.

          In addition, the Holding Company may not issue new debt or renew existing debt without prior non-objection of the OTS.

          In addition to its deposits, Downey’s principal source of liquidity is its ability to utilize borrowings, as needed. The Bank’s primary source of borrowings is the FHLB. At June 30, 2008, the Bank’s FHLB borrowings totaled $1.5 billion, representing 12.1% of total assets. As of August 8, 2008, the Bank’s FHLB borrowings totaled $2.8 billion. Approximately half of the Bank’s increase in FHLB borrowings subsequent to June 30, 2008 is being held in cash equivalents and short-term investment securities to meet our liquidity needs. The Bank currently is approved by the FHLB to borrow up to a maximum of $3.0 billion to the extent it provides qualifying collateral, providing the Bank with an additional $0.2 billion of borrowing capacity from the FHLB as of August 8. The amount the FHLB is willing to advance differs based on the quality and character of qualifying collateral offered by the Bank, and the advance rates for qualifying collateral may be adjusted upwards or downwards by the FHLB from time to time. The Bank also is approved to borrow funds on an overnight basis from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco subject to the amount of qualifying collateral it pledges. The Bank views the Federal Reserve Bank as a back-up source of liquidity. As of August 8, 2008, the Bank had no outstanding borrowings from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and the Bank’s available qualifying collateral would have permitted it to borrow up to an additional $1.5 billion. Neither the FHLB nor the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco is obligated to lend to us under these loan facilities. To the extent deposit renewals and deposit growth are not sufficient to fund maturing and withdrawable deposits, repay maturing borrowings, fund existing and future loans and investment securities and otherwise fund working capital needs and capital expenditures, the Bank may utilize additional borrowing capacity from its FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank borrowing arrangements.

Page 19
Navigation Links

          After the end of the second quarter, the Bank experienced elevated levels of deposit withdrawals. More recently, in response to steps taken by management to address the situation, the Bank has experienced net deposit inflows. If the Bank’s deposit levels continue to stabilize with withdrawals at historical levels, Downey believes its current sources of funds, including deposits; advances from the FHLB and other borrowings; proceeds from the sale of loans and real estate; payments of loans and payments for and sales of loan servicing; and income from other investments would enable Downey to meet its obligations while maintaining liquidity at appropriate levels. However, if elevated levels of net deposit outflows resume, the Bank’s usual sources of liquidity could become depleted, and the Bank would be required to raise additional capital or enter into new financing arrangements to satisfy its liquidity needs. In the current economic environment, there are no assurances that we would be able to raise additional capital or enter into additional financing arrangements.

          Management believes that the Holding Company, on a stand-alone basis, currently has adequate liquid assets to meet its current obligations, which are primarily interest payments on $199 million of senior notes. Limitations imposed by the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”) discussed below currently prohibit the Bank from providing a dividend to the Holding Company without prior OTS approval, and the Holding Company from paying dividends (other than the quarterly dividend payable in August 2008), and incurring and renewing debt, without prior non-objection of the OTS. At June 30, 2008, the Holding Company’s liquid assets, including amounts deposited with the Bank, totaled $53 million, down from $102 million at the end of 2007 due primarily to a $50 million capital contribution to the Bank.

          Downey’s stockholders’ equity totaled $0.9 billion at June 30, 2008, down from $1.3 billion at December 31, 2007 and $1.5 billion at June 30, 2007. The Board reduced the quarterly per share dividend payment from $0.12 to $0.01 for the dividend payable in August 2008, after which no future dividends will be paid without prior non-objection of the OTS.

          In light of the current operating environment and Downey’s recent quarterly losses, the Holding Company and the Bank have been working closely with the Bank’s federal banking regulators. In that regard, the OTS, the Bank’s principal regulator, has also imposed the following limitations on the Holding Company and the Bank: the Bank may not pay dividends to the Holding Company without prior OTS approval, and the Holding Company may not pay dividends without prior non-objection of the OTS; the Bank may not increase its assets during any quarter in excess of an amount equal to net interest credited on deposit liabilities without prior OTS approval; the Holding Company may not issue or renew debt without the prior non-objection of the OTS; the Holding Company and the Bank must provide prior notice to the OTS regarding any additions or changes to directors or senior executive officers (or changes in the responsibilities of senior executive officers); the Holding Company and the Bank may not pay certain kinds of severance and other forms of compensation without regulatory approval; the Bank may not enter into, renew, extend or revise any contract related to compensation or benefits with any director or senior executive officer without prior regulatory approval; the Bank must provide prior notice to the OTS (and not receive any objection) before engaging in transactions with any affiliate or subsidiary. In addition, Downey is subject to higher regulatory assessments and FDIC deposit insurance premiums than those prevailing in prior periods.

          In response to the challenges facing Downey in the current operating environment, Downey has formed a special Board committee to explore a range of strategic alternatives, including the raising of additional capital to levels deemed by the Board to be appropriate under the circumstances.

Page 20
Navigation Links

ITEM 2. – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

          Certain statements under this caption may constitute “forward-looking statements” under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements do not relate strictly to historical information or current facts. Some forward-looking statements may be identified by use of terms such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” or words of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could” or “may.” Our actual results or outcomes may differ significantly from the results discussed in such forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, economic conditions, competition in the geographic and business areas in which we conduct our operations, new, changed or increased regulatory restrictions, pending or threatened litigation, a decrease in our customers, including a decrease in our deposit base, the possible loss of key personnel, the inability to successfully implement strategic initiatives, changes in deposit flows and loan demand, limitations on our ability to borrow to fund our assets and operations, risk of credit losses, risk associated with residential mortgage lending, risk associated with a slowdown in the housing market or high interest rates, fluctuations in interest rates, credit quality, the outcome of ongoing audits by regulatory and taxing authorities and government regulation and factors, identified under part II – Other Information Item 1A. Risk Factors on page 67. We do not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect the impact of circumstances or events that arise after the date the forward-looking statements were made, except as required by law. We are not able to make any assurances, including but not limited to any assurances that the increased rate of sale of foreclosed homes will continue in future periods, the percentage of unsold homes in escrow or under negotiation will be representative of the number or percentage of homes sold in future periods, the improved quality of our loan portfolio will continue in future periods, we will have adequate liquidity in future periods, or our capital levels will exceed “well-capitalized” levels in future periods.

OVERVIEW

          A net loss was recorded for the second quarter of 2008 of $218.9 million or $7.86 per share on a diluted basis, compared with net income of $32.7 million or $1.17 per share in the second quarter of 2007.

          The $309.5 million unfavorable change in pre-tax income/(loss) between second quarters was due primarily to:

          For the first six months of 2008, the net loss totaled $466.6 million or $16.75 per share on a diluted basis, compared with net income of $75.6 million or $2.71 per share for the first six months of 2007. The decline primarily reflected an increase in our provision for credit losses, lower net interest income and higher operating expenses.

          For the second quarter, our return on average assets was a negative 6.76%, and our return on average equity was a negative 85.33%. These compare to year-ago positive returns of 0.87% on average assets and 9.01% on average equity. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, our return on average assets was a negative 7.08%, and our return on average equity was a negative 80.67%. These compare to year-ago positive returns of 0.98% on average assets and 10.54% on average equity.

          At June 30, 2008, assets totaled $12.632 billion, down $2.271 billion or 15.2% from a year ago. During the current quarter, assets declined $499 million due primarily to a decline of $605 million in investment securities. That decline was partially offset by a $72 million increase in real estate acquired in settlement of loans, net, and a $64 million increase in income tax receivable. Although gross loans held for investment increased by $231 million, this growth was substantially offset by a $186 million increase in the allowance for loan losses. Included within loans held for investment at quarter end were $6.242 billion of single family adjustable rate mortgages subject to negative amortization, down $721 million from March 31, 2008. These loans comprised 57% of the single family residential loan portfolio held for investment at quarter end, compared with 76% a year ago. The amount of negative amortization included in loan balances declined $31 million during

Page 21
Navigation Links

the current quarter to $344 million or 5.5% of loans subject to negative amortization. During the current quarter, approximately 15% of loan interest income represented negative amortization, down from 20% in the first quarter 2008 and 29% in the year-ago second quarter.

          Loan originations (including purchases) totaled $1.027 billion in the current quarter, down $182 million or 15.0% from $1.209 billion a year ago, but up from $676 million in the first quarter of 2008. Loans originated for sale declined $283 million or 57.2% to $212 million, while single family residential loans originated for portfolio increased $52 million or 7.4% to $751 million from a year ago. In addition to single family residential loans, $65 million of other loans were originated in the current quarter, up from $15 million a year ago. For the first six months of 2008, loan originations totaled $1.703 billion, down $767 million or 31.0% from the same period a year-ago.

          Not included in the above originations are loans for which we modified the terms of a borrower’s loan. During the current quarter, we modified $320 million of loans associated with our portfolio retention program, wherein the borrower was current with their loan payments and the new interest rate was no less than that afforded new borrowers, and $79 million of loans at below market interest rates in loan workout situations. Most of the modifications were adjustable rate loans which permitted negative amortization that were modified into five-year interest-only adjustable rate loans with interest rates that adjust semi-annually but do not permit negative amortization.

          Deposits totaled $9.881 billion at quarter end, down $1.366 billion or 12.1% from a year ago. Although deposits declined from a year ago, the number of checking accounts was up modestly over a year ago. At quarter end, the number of branches totaled 174 (169 in California and five in Arizona). At quarter end, the average deposit size of our 84 traditional branches was $94 million, while the average deposit size of our 90 in-store branches was $22 million. During the current quarter, borrowings increased by $85 million and represented 14% of total assets at quarter end.

          Non-performing assets increased during the quarter by $395 million to $1.958 billion and represented 15.50% of total assets, compared with 7.77% at year-end 2007 and 1.53% a year ago. Virtually all of the increase in the current quarter was related to our single family residential lending activity. Included in non-performing assets are loans modified pursuant to our borrower retention program. This program was initiated at the beginning of the third quarter of 2007 to provide borrowers who are current with their loan payments a cost effective means to change from an adjustable rate loans that permitted negative amortization to a less costly financing alternative. To the extent borrowers whose loans were modified as part of this program are current with their loan payments and included in non-performing assets, it is relevant to distinguish those from total non-performing assets because, unlike other loans classified as non-performing assets, these loans are paying interest at interest rates no less than those afforded new borrowers. At June 30, 2008, 82% of such borrowers had made all loan payments due. Accordingly, the 15.50% ratio of non-performing assets to total assets includes 4.34% related to performing troubled debt restructurings resulting in an adjusted ratio of 11.16%.

          At June 30, 2008, Downey Savings and Loan Association, F.A. (the “Bank”), our primary subsidiary, had capital-to-asset ratios of 7.57% for both tangible and core capital, and 14.31% for total risk-based capital. As previously reported, the Bank’s regulatory capital position was enhanced by $62 million during the second quarter from a contribution of $50 million of equity from the Holding Company and a $12 million dividend paid by DSL Service Company, the Bank’s wholly-owned real estate subsidiary. This was more than offset by the net loss recorded in the current quarter.

          In light of the current operating environment and Downey’s recent quarterly losses, the Holding Company and the Bank have been working closely with the Bank’s federal banking regulators. In that regard, the OTS, the Bank’s principal regulator, has also imposed the following limitations on the Bank: the Bank may not pay dividends to the Holding Company without prior OTS approval; the Bank may not increase its assets during any quarter in excess of an amount equal to net interest credited on deposit liabilities without prior OTS approval; the Bank must provide prior notice to the OTS regarding any additions or changes to directors or senior executive officers (or changes in the responsibilities of senior executive officers); the Bank may not pay certain kinds of severance and other forms of compensation without regulatory approval; the Bank may not enter into, renew, extend or revise any contract related to compensation or benefits with any director or senior executive officer without prior regulatory approval; and the Bank must provide prior notice to the OTS (and not receive any objection) before engaging in transactions with any affiliate or subsidiary. In addition, the Bank is subject to higher regulatory assessments and FDIC deposit insurance premiums than those prevailing in prior periods.

          In response to the challenges facing Downey in the current operating environment, Downey has formed a special Board committee to explore a range of strategic alternatives, including the raising of additional capital to levels deemed by the Board to be appropriate under the circumstances.

Page 22
Navigation Links

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

          We have established various accounting policies which govern the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America in the preparation of our financial statements. Certain accounting policies require us to make significant estimates and assumptions which could have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities, and we consider these to be critical accounting policies. The estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors, which we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates and assumptions which could have a material impact on the future carrying value of assets and liabilities and our results of operations for the reporting periods. We believe the following four critical accounting policies require the most judicious estimates and assumptions, which are particularly susceptible to significant change in the preparation of our financial statements:

The nature of these judgments, estimates and assumptions are described in greater detail in Downey’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 in the "Critical Accounting Policies" section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements – "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies."

          In addition to those critical accounting policies addressed in Downey’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, we have added:

          Management has discussed the development and selection of these critical accounting policies with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.

Page 23
Navigation Links

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net Interest Income

          Net interest income is the difference between the interest and dividends earned on loans, mortgage-backed securities and investment securities (“interest-earning assets”) and the interest paid on deposits and borrowings (“interest-bearing liabilities”). The spread between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities and the relative dollar amounts of these assets and liabilities principally affects net interest income.

          Our net interest income totaled $82.9 million in the second quarter of 2008, down $28.5 million or 25.6% from a year ago, reflecting a $2.367 billion or 16.3% decline in average interest-earning assets to $12.168 billion and a decline in the effective interest rate spread. The average effective interest rate spread was 2.73% in the current quarter, down 0.34% from a year ago but up 0.10% from the first quarter of 2008. The decline in the current quarter effective interest spread from a year ago primarily reflected the negative impact of a higher proportion of non-performing assets. Although non-performing assets increased in the current quarter from the first quarter of 2008, the earning asset yield did not decline as rapidly as the cost of funds resulting in an increase in the effective interest rate spread.

          For the first six months of 2008, net interest income totaled $166.7 million, down $69.9 million or 29.6% from the year-ago period. The decline was due to lower interest-earning assets and a lower effective interest rate spread in the current period. The following table presents for the periods indicated the total dollar amount of:

The table also sets forth our net interest income, interest rate spread and effective interest rate spread. The effective interest rate spread reflects the relative level of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities and equals:

Page 24
Navigation Links

The table also sets forth the difference between the average balance of interest-earning assets and the average balance of total deposits and borrowings for the quarters indicated. While we included non-accrual loans in the average interest-earning assets balance, interest from non-accrual loans has not been included in interest income unless we received payments and we believe the remaining principal balance of the loans will be recovered. We computed average balances for the quarter using the average of each month’s daily average balance during the periods indicated.

Three Months Ended June 30,


2008

2007


Average

Average

Average

Average

(Dollars in Thousands)

Balance

Interest

Yield/Rate

Balance

Interest

Yield/Rate


Average balance sheet data

Interest-earning assets:

Loans:

Loan prepayment fees

$

1,199

0.05

%

$

17,591

0.55

%

Write-off of deferred costs and

premiums from loan payoffs

(4,847

)

(0.18

)

(24,325

)

(0.76

)

All other

164,805

6.10

237,117

7.39


Total loans

$

10,804,289

161,157

5.97

$

12,835,907

230,383

7.18

Mortgage-backed securities

108

3

5.78

116

3

5.92

Investment securities (a)

1,363,159

16,890

4.98

1,698,378

21,838

5.16


Total interest-earnings assets

12,167,556

$

178,050

5.85

%

14,534,401

$

252,224

6.94

%

Non-interest-earning assets

779,766

480,034


Total assets

$

12,947,322

$

15,014,435


Transaction accounts:

Non-interest-bearing checking (b)

$

695,040

$

-

-

%

$

800,910

$

-

-

%

Interest-bearing checking (b)

450,563

501

0.45

486,909

382

0.31

Money market

136,739

353

1.04

145,230

376

1.04

Regular passbook

1,021,936

2,346

0.92

1,190,524

2,814

0.95


Total transaction accounts

2,304,278

3,200

0.56

2,623,573

3,572

0.55

Certificates of deposit

7,747,572

75,693

3.93

8,768,716

108,316

4.95


Total deposits

10,051,850

78,893

3.16

11,392,289

111,888

3.94

FHLB advances and other borrowings (c)

1,547,973

12,922

3.36

1,734,014

25,576

5.92

Senior notes

198,518

3,304

6.66

198,333

3,301

6.66


Total deposits and borrowings

11,798,341

95,119

3.24

13,324,636

140,765

4.24

Other liabilities

122,723

235,991

Stockholders’ equity

1,026,258

1,453,808


Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$

12,947,322

$

15,014,435


Net interest income/interest rate spread

$

82,931

2.61

%

$

111,459

2.70

%

Excess of interest-earning assets over

deposits and borrowings

$

369,215

$

1,209,765

Effective interest rate spread

2.73

3.07


(a) Yields for securities available for sale are calculated using historical cost balances and are not adjusted for changes in fair value that are reflected as a separate component of stockholders’ equity.
(b) Included amounts swept into money market deposit accounts.
(c) The impact of swap contracts was included, with notional amounts totaling $430 million of receive-fixed, pay-3-month London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) variable interest, which contracts serve as a permitted hedge against a portion of our FHLB advances.
Page 25
Navigation Links

 

Six Months Ended June 30,


2008

2007


Average

Average

Average

Average

(Dollars in Thousands)

Balance

Interest

Yield/Rate

Balance

Interest

Yield/Rate


Average balance sheet data

Interest-earning assets:

Loans:

Loan prepayment fees

$

3,169

0.06

%

$

39,395

0.59

%

Write-off of deferred costs and

premiums from loan payoffs

(12,278

)

(0.23

)

(50,139

)

(0.75

)

All other

347,823

6.39

493,299

7.44


Total loans

$

10,890,484

338,714

6.22

$

13,257,340

482,555

7.28

Mortgage-backed securities

110

6

5.78

134

6

5.89

Investment securities (a)

1,565,388

38,456

4.94

1,638,663

43,483

5.35


Total interest-earnings assets

12,455,982

$

377,176

6.06

%

14,896,137

$

526,044

7.06

%

Non-interest-earning assets

732,473

474,773


Total assets

$

13,188,455

$

15,370,910


Transaction accounts:

Non-interest-bearing checking (b)

$

673,172

$

-

-

%

$

777,986

$

-

-

%

Interest-bearing checking (b)

455,061

1,066

0.47

487,542

777

0.32

Money market

135,906

702

1.04

147,807

761

1.04

Regular passbook

1,027,649

4,735

0.93

1,217,173

5,763

0.95


Total transaction accounts

2,291,788

6,503

0.57

2,630,508

7,301

0.56

Certificates of deposit

7,908,335

168,818

4.29

8,886,450

218,162

4.95


Total deposits

10,200,123

175,321

3.46

11,516,958

225,463

3.95

FHLB advances and other borrowings (c)

1,479,443

28,591

3.89

1,980,803

57,406

5.84

Senior notes

198,497

6,608

6.66

198,311

6,602

6.66


Total deposits and borrowings

11,878,063

210,520

3.56

13,696,072

289,471

4.26

Other liabilities

153,572

239,531

Stockholders’ equity

1,156,820

1,435,307


Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$

13,188,455

$

15,370,910


Net interest income/interest rate spread

$

166,656

2.50

%

$

236,573

2.80

%

Excess of interest-earning assets over

deposits and borrowings

$

577,919

$

1,200,065

Effective interest rate spread

2.68

3.18


(a) Yields for securities available for sale are calculated using historical cost balances and are not adjusted for changes in fair value that are reflected as a separate component of stockholders’ equity.
(b) Included amounts swept into money market deposit accounts.
(c) The impact of swap contracts was included, with notional amounts totaling $430 million of receive-fixed, pay-3-month LIBOR variable interest, which contracts serve as a permitted hedge against a portion of our FHLB advances.
Page 26
Navigation Links

          Changes in our net interest income are a function of changes in both rates and volumes of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The following table sets forth information regarding changes in our interest income and expense for the periods indicated. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, we have provided information on changes attributable to:

Interest-earning asset and interest-bearing liability balances used in the calculations represent quarterly average balances computed using the average of each month’s daily average balance during the periods indicated.

Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

2008 Versus 2007

2008 Versus 2007

Changes Due To

Changes Due To


Rate/

Rate/

(In Thousands)

Volume

Rate

Volume

Net

Volume

Rate

Volume

Net


Interest income:

Loans

$

(36,464

)

$

(38,922

)

$

6,160

$

(69,226

)

$

(86,152

)

$

(70,227

)

$

12,538

$

(143,841

)

Mortgage-backed securities

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Investment securities

(4,351

)

(744

)

147

(4,948

)

(1,904

)

(3,269

)

146

(5,027

)


Change in interest income

(40,815

)

(39,666

)

6,307

(74,174

)

(88,056

)

(73,496

)

12,684

(148,868

)


Interest expense:

Transaction accounts:

Interest-bearing checking

(28

)

159

(12

)

119

(52

)

365

(24

)

289

Money market

(23

)

-

-

(23

)

(59

)

-

-

(59

)

Regular passbook

(404

)

(74

)

10

(468

)

(887

)

(168

)

27

(1,028

)


Total transaction accounts

(455

)

85

(2

)

(372

)

(998

)

197

3

(798

)

Certificates of deposit

(12,694

)

(22,556

)

2,627

(32,623

)

(23,787

)

(28,721

)

3,164

(49,344

)


Total interest-bearing deposits

(13,149

)

(22,471

)

2,625

(32,995

)

(24,785

)

(28,524

)

3,167

(50,142

)

FHLB advances and other

borrowings

(2,752

)

(11,092

)

1,190

(12,654

)

(14,491

)

(19,178

)

4,854

(28,815

)

Senior notes

3

-

-

3

6

-

-

6


Change in interest expense

(15,898

)

(33,563

)

3,815

(45,646

)

(39,270

)

(47,702

)

8,021

(78,951

)


Change in net interest income

$

(24,917

)

$

(6,103

)

$

2,492

$

(28,528

)

$

(48,786

)

$

(25,794

)

$

4,663

$

(69,917

)


Provision for Credit Losses

           During the current quarter, our provision for credit losses totaled $258.9 million, up $249.4 million from a year ago. The increase in our provision for credit losses reflects continued weakening and uncertainty relative to the housing market and disruption in the secondary markets which have unfavorably impacted our borrowers and the value of their loan collateral.

          For the first six months of 2008, the provision for credit losses totaled $495.7 million, compared with $10.1 million a year ago. For further information, see Allowance for Credit and Real Estate Losses on page 57.

Other Income

          Other income totaled $12.1 million in the current quarter, down $5.5 million or 31.2% from a year ago. Primary contributors to the decline between second quarters were:

These unfavorable items were partially offset by a $4.8 million increase in income from loan servicing fees due primarily to a favorable change in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights as a result of slower prepayment speeds.

Page 27
Navigation Links

          For the first six months of 2008, other income totaled $21.0 million, down $14.2 million or 40.4% from a year ago. The decline primarily reflected lower net gains from the sale of loans and mortgage-backed securities as well as an unfavorable change in income from real estate and joint ventures held for investment.

          Below is a further detailed discussion of the major other income categories.

Loan and Deposit Related Fees

          Our loan and deposit related fees totaled $8.2 million in the current quarter, down $1.1 million from a year ago. The decline was primarily related to lower automated teller machine fees of $0.6 million and loan related fees of $0.4 million.

          The following table presents a breakdown of loan and deposit related fees during the quarters indicated.

Three Months Ended


June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(In Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Loan related fees

$

377

$

422

$

467

$

572

$

819

Deposit related fees:

Automated teller machine fees

1,859

1,997

2,285

2,287

2,440

Other fees

5,968

5,820

6,215

6,054

6,079


Total loan and deposit related fees

$

8,204

$

8,239

$

8,967

$

8,913

$

9,338


          For the first six months of 2008, loan and deposit related fees totaled $16.4 million, down $1.7 million from the same period of 2007. Both automated teller machine fees and loan related fees declined by $0.9 million each.

          The following table presents a breakdown of loan and deposit related fees during the year-to-date periods indicated.

Six Months Ended June 30,


(In Thousands)

2008

2007


Loan related fees

$

799

$

1,661

Deposit related fees:

Automated teller machine fees

3,856

4,745

Other fees

11,788

11,768


Total loan and deposit related fees

$

16,443

$

18,174


Real Estate and Joint Ventures Held for Investment

          A loss of $5.3 million was recorded from our real estate and joint ventures held for investment, compared to a loss of $0.1 million a year ago. Although net gains from sales increased $5.8 million from a year ago to $6.2 million, that improvement was more than offset by a current quarter provision for losses of $11.1 million to reflect declines in the value of single family lots in which we are a joint venture partner.

          The following table sets forth the key components comprising our income from real estate and joint venture operations during the quarters indicated.

Three Months Ended


June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(In Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Net rental operations and income from community

development funds

$

133

$

331

$

(49

)

$

576

$

49

Net gains on sales of wholly owned real estate

6,129

-

-

-

-

Equity (deficit) in net income (loss) from

joint ventures

(79

)

(945

)

681

(8,492

)

193

(Provision for) reduction of losses on real estate

and joint ventures

(11,454

)

9

10

24

(353

)


Total income (loss) from real estate and

joint ventures held for investment, net

$

(5,271

)

$

(605

)

$

642

$

(7,892

)

$

(111

)


          For the first six months of 2008, a loss of $5.9 million was recorded from real estate and joint ventures held for investment, compared to income of $0.4 million a year ago. The unfavorable change primarily reflected an increase in the provision for losses in the current period which were only partially offset by net gains from sales.

Page 28
Navigation Links

          The following table sets forth the key components comprising our income from real estate and joint venture operations during the year-to-date periods indicated.

Six Months Ended June 30,


(In Thousands)

2008

2007


Net rental operations and income from community development funds

$

464

$

594

Net gains on sales of wholly owned real estate

6,129

22

Equity (deficit) in net income (loss) from joint ventures

(1,024

)

102

Provision for losses on real estate and joint ventures

(11,445

)

(353

)


Total income (loss) from real estate and joint ventures held for investment, net

$

(5,876

)

$

365


Secondary Marketing Activities

          We service loans for others and those activities generated a gain of $4.0 million in the current quarter, up from a loss of $0.8 million in the year-ago quarter. This primarily reflected a $3.6 million favorable change from the measurement of MSRs to fair value and a $1.0 million favorable change in payoff and curtailment interest cost. Payoff and curtailment interest costs represent the difference between the contractual obligation to pay interest to the investor for an entire month and the actual interest received when a loan prepays prior to the end of the month. Loan servicing income (loss), net does not reflect the interest income we derive from the use of those loan repayments as it is included in net interest income.

          Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted the fair value provision of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (“SFAS 156”) and remeasured our MSRs at fair value. For further information regarding the adoption of SFAS 156 and our MSRs, see Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 6.

          At June 30, 2008, MSRs totaled $23.6 million or 0.95% of the $2.471 billion of associated loans serviced for others, up $1.9 million from the year ago balance accounted for under the amortized cost method. In addition to the loans we serviced for others with capitalized MSRs, at June 30, 2008, we serviced $2.961 billion of loans on a sub-servicing basis where we receive a fixed fee per loan, with no risk associated with changing MSR values.

          The following table presents a breakdown of the components of our loan servicing income (loss), net for the quarters indicated.

Three Months Ended


June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(In Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Net cash servicing fees

$

1,750

$

1,765

$

2,166

$

1,657

$

1,598

Payoff and curtailment interest cost (a)

(350

)

(471

)

(544

)

(787

)

(1,391

)

Change in fair value of mortgage servicing

rights due to: (b)

Changes in valuation model inputs or

assumptions (c)

3,325

(1,751

)

-

-

-

Other changes (d)

(749

)

(739

)

-

-

-

Amortization of mortgage servicing rights

-

-

(1,085

)

(950

)

(967

)

Provision for impairment of mortgage

servicing rights

-

-

(2,197

)

(214

)

(29

)


Total loan servicing income (loss), net

$

3,976

$

(1,196

)

$

(1,660

)

$

(294

)

$

(789

)


(a) Represents the difference between the contractual obligation to pay interest to the investor for an entire month and the actual interest received when a loan prepays prior to the end of the month. However, loan servicing activities do not include the benefit of the use of total loan repayments to increase net interest income.
(b) Effective January 1, 2008, Downey adopted the fair value provision of SFAS 156 and remeasured its MSRs at fair value. Downey recorded a pretax adjustment to increase MSRs by $1.5 million and a corresponding cumulative effect adjustment of $0.9 million, after tax, to increase the 2008 beginning balance of retained earnings in stockholders’ equity.
(c) Reflects changes in assumptions for such items as discount rates and prepayment speeds.
(d) Represents changes due to realization of expected cash flows over time.

          For the first six months of 2008, income of $2.8 million was recorded from loan servicing activities, compared to a loss of $1.2 million for the same period of 2007. The favorable change primarily reflected a reduction in payoff and curtailment interest costs and a favorable change in the fair value of MSRs in the current period versus the amortization of MSRs a year ago.

Page 29
Navigation Links

          The following table presents a breakdown of the components of our loan servicing income (loss), net during the year-to-date periods indicated.

Six Months Ended June 30,


(In Thousands)

2008

2007


Net cash servicing fees

$

3,515

$

3,205

Payoff and curtailment interest cost (a)

(821

)

(2,454

)

Change in fair value of mortgage servicing rights due to: (b)

Changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions (c)

1,574

-

Other changes (d)

(1,488

)

-

Amortization of mortgage servicing rights

-

(1,991

)

Reduction of impairment of mortgage servicing rights

-

15


Total loan servicing income (loss), net

$

2,780

$

(1,225

)


(a) Represents the difference between the contractual obligation to pay interest to the investor for an entire month and the actual interest received when a loan prepays prior to the end of the month. However, loan servicing activities do not include the benefit of the use of total loan repayments to increase net interest income.
(b) Effective January 1, 2008, Downey adopted the fair value provision of SFAS 156 and remeasured its MSRs at fair value. Downey recorded a pretax adjustment to increase MSRs by $1.5 million and a corresponding cumulative effect adjustment of $0.9 million, after tax, to increase the 2008 beginning balance of retained earnings in stockholders’ equity.
(c) Reflects changes in assumptions for such items as discount rates and prepayment speeds.
(d) Represents changes due to realization of expected cash flows over time.

          Our net gains on sales of loans and mortgage-backed securities totaled $4.6 million in the current quarter, down $4.4 million from a year ago, reflecting both a decline in loans sold and a lower gain per dollar of loan sold. The current quarter included a $2.1 million gain due to the SFAS 133 impact of valuing derivatives associated with the sale of loans, compared with a SFAS 133 gain of $0.9 million in the year-ago quarter. Excluding the impact of SFAS 133, a gain was realized equal to 1.05% on secondary market sales of $235 million, compared with the year-ago gain of 1.42% on secondary market sales of $570 million.

          The following table presents a breakdown of the components of our net gains on sales of loans and mortgage-backed securities for the quarters indicated.

Three Months Ended


June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(In Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Mortgage servicing rights

$

1,557

$

1,122

$

945

$

1,394

$

1,926

All other components excluding SFAS 133

916

596

(393

)

1,665

6,186

SFAS 133

2,099

(69

)

(460

)

(553

)

866


Total net gains on sales of loans and

mortgage-backed securities

$

4,572

$

1,649

$

92

$

2,506

$

8,978


Secondary marketing gain excluding SFAS

133 as a percentage of associated sales

1.05

%

0.75

%

0.31

%

0.91

%

1.42

%


          For the first six months of 2008, our sales of loans and mortgage-backed securities totaled $464 million, down from $1.3 billion a year ago. Net gains associated with these sales totaled $6.2 million, or $11.5 million lower than the prior year amount. Excluding the impact of SFAS 133, a gain equal to 0.90% per dollar of loan sold was realized in the current year, down from the year-ago gain of 1.29%.

          The following table presents a breakdown of the components of our net gains on sales of loans and mortgage-backed securities during the year-to-date periods indicated.

Six Months Ended June 30,


(In Thousands)

2008

2007


Mortgage servicing rights

$

2,679

$

3,267

All other components excluding SFAS 133

1,512

13,334

SFAS 133

2,030

1,117


Total net gains on sales of loans and mortgage-backed securities

$

6,221

$

17,718


Secondary marketing gain excluding SFAS 133 as a percentage of associated sales

0.90

%

1.29

%


Page 30
Navigation Links

Operating Expense

          Our operating expense totaled $88.5 million in the current quarter, up $26.2 million or 42.0% from a year ago. The increase primarily reflected an increase of $23.2 million in net operations of real estate acquired in the settlement of loans due to a higher number of foreclosed properties. General and administrative expense increased $3.0 million or 4.8% between second quarters, due primarily to an increase in the other general and administrative expense category, which was up $2.8 million. That increase was primarily attributable to an adjustment in the prior year period related to liabilities associated with workers’ compensation insurance claims. Also contributing to the increase between second quarters was a $1.2 million increase in regulatory assessments due primarily to a special credit received in the prior period. Partially offsetting these unfavorable items was a $1.1 million decline in advertising expense. Although salaries and related costs were essentially unchanged between second quarters, the current quarter included severance costs of approximately $1.0 million associated with the previously announced departure of Downey’s former President.

          The following table presents a breakdown of key components comprising operating expense for the quarters indicated.

Three Months Ended


June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(In Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Salaries and related costs

$

40,884

$

39,702

$

38,882

$

36,699

$

40,998

Premises and equipment costs

9,181

8,997

10,257

9,736

9,122

Advertising expense

816

461

1,443

1,400

1,878

Deposit insurance premiums and regulatory

assessments

3,689

3,703

2,516

2,413

2,482

Professional fees

843

303

916

489

731

Impairment writedown of goodwill

-

3,149

-

-

-

Other general and administrative expense

8,974

8,480

8,732

8,275

6,201


Total general and administrative expense

64,387

64,795

62,746

59,012

61,412

Net operation of real estate acquired in

settlement of loans

24,139

24,196

4,583

3,664

948


Total operating expense

$

88,526

$

88,991

$

67,329

$

62,676

$

62,360


          For the first six months of 2008, operating expense totaled $177.5 million, up $49.5 million or 38.7% from a year ago. The increase primarily reflected higher net operations of real estate acquired in the settlement of loans, deposit insurance premiums, a goodwill impairment charge during the first quarter of 2008 and other general and administrative expenses. Those increases were partially offset by a decline in salaries and related costs and advertising expense.

          The following table presents a breakdown of key components comprising operating expense during the year-to-date periods indicated.

Six Months Ended June 30,


(In Thousands)

2008

2007


Salaries and related costs

$

80,586

$

83,232

Premises and equipment costs

18,178

17,931

Advertising expense

1,277

3,069

Deposit insurance premiums and regulatory assessments

7,392

5,246

Professional fees

1,146

1,290

Impairment writedown of goodwill

3,149

-

Other general and administrative expense

17,454

15,996


Total general and administrative expense

129,182

126,764

Net operation of real estate acquired in settlement of loans

48,335

1,239


Total operating expense

$

177,517

$

128,003


Provision for Income Taxes

          A tax benefit of $33.5 million was recorded in the current quarter, reflecting an effective tax rate of 13.3%, compared with the year-ago effective tax rate of 42.7%. For the first six months of 2008, the effective tax rate was 3.9%, compared with 43.4% a year ago. For further information, see Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 15.

Page 31
Navigation Links

Business Segment Reporting

          The previous discussion and analysis of the Results of Operations pertained to our consolidated results. This section discusses and analyzes the results of operations of our two business segments: banking and real estate investment. For further information, see Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 18.

          The following table presents by business segment our net income (loss) for the periods indicated.

Three Months Ended


June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(In Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Banking net income (loss)

$

(215,707

)

$

(247,258

)

$

(109,282

)

$

(18,851

)

$

32,614

Real estate investment net income (loss)

(3,212

)

(439

)

437

(4,510

)

130


Total net income (loss)

$

(218,919

)

$

(247,697

)

$

(108,845

)

$

(23,361

)

$

32,744


          The following table presents by business segment our net income for the year-to-date periods indicated.

Six Months Ended June 30,


(In Thousands)

2008

2007


Banking net income (loss)

$

(462,965

)

$

75,037

Real estate investment net income (loss)

(3,651

)

570


Total net income (loss)

$

(466,616

)

$

75,607


Banking

          A net loss of $215.7 million was recorded in the current quarter related to our banking operations, compared with income of $32.6 million a year ago. The unfavorable change between second quarters primarily reflected:

          The following table sets forth our banking operational results and selected financial data for the quarters indicated.

Three Months Ended


June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(In Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Net interest income

$

82,866

$

83,601

$

89,059

$

97,656

$

111,097

Provision for credit losses

258,874

236,870

218,447

81,562

9,505

Other income

17,224

9,439

7,424

10,756

17,368

Operating expense

88,207

88,672

67,038

62,365

62,060

Net intercompany income

22

46

15

22

19


Income (loss) before income taxes (tax benefits)

(246,969

)

(232,456

)

(188,987

)

(35,493

)

56,919

Income taxes (tax benefits)

(31,262

)

14,802

(79,705

)

(16,642

)

24,305


Net income (loss)

$

(215,707

)

$

(247,258

)

$

(109,282

)

$

(18,851

)

$

32,614


At period end

Assets:

Loans and mortgage-backed securities, net

$

10,716,676

$

10,725,865

$

11,136,655

$

11,692,185

$

12,392,066

Other

1,902,632

2,392,047

2,258,746

2,710,006

2,496,685


Total assets

12,619,308

13,117,912

13,395,401

14,402,191

14,888,751


Equity

$

858,937

$

1,090,484

$

1,334,417

$

1,444,226

$

1,464,473


          For the first six months of 2008, our net loss from our banking operations totaled $463.0 million, compared to income of $75.0 million a year ago. The unfavorable change primarily reflected a higher provision for credit losses, lower net interest income, and higher operating expense.

Page 32
Navigation Links

          The following table sets forth our banking operational results for the year-to-date periods indicated.

Six Months Ended June 30,


(In Thousands)

2008

2007


Net interest income

$

166,467

$

235,849

Provision for credit losses

495,744

10,122

Other income

26,663

34,300

Operating expense

176,879

127,335

Net intercompany income

68

31


Income (loss) before income taxes (tax benefits)

(479,425

)

132,723

Income taxes (tax benefits)

(16,460

)

57,686


Net income (loss)

$

(462,965

)

$

75,037


Real Estate Investment

          A net loss of $3.2 million was recorded in the current quarter from our real estate investment operations, compared to net income of $0.1 million a year ago. Although net gains from sales increased $5.8 million between second quarters, that was more than offset by a $11.1 million provision for losses in the current quarter to reflect declines in the value of single family lots in which we are a joint venture partner.

          The following table sets forth real estate investment operational results and selected financial data for the quarters indicated.

Three Months Ended


June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(In Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Net interest income

$

65

$

124

$

236

$

314

$

362

Other income (loss)

(5,159

)

(501

)

803

(7,720

)

157

Operating expense

319

319

291

311

300

Net intercompany expense

(22

)

(46

)

(15

)

(22

)

(19

)


Income (loss) before income taxes (tax benefits)

(5,435

)

(742

)

733

(7,739

)

200

Income taxes (tax benefits)

(2,223

)

(303

)

296

(3,229

)

70


Net income (loss)

$

(3,212

)

$

(439

)

$

437

$

(4,510

)

$

130


At period end

Assets:

Investments in real estate and joint ventures

$

63,182

$

71,196

$

68,679

$

58,715

$

64,997

Other

8,224

15,848

19,023

30,420

27,341


Total assets

71,406

87,044

87,702

89,135

92,338


Equity

$

58,395

$

73,607

$

74,046

$

73,609

$

78,119


          For the first six months of 2008, a net loss of $3.7 million was recorded related to our real estate investment operations, compared to income of $0.6 million a year ago. The unfavorable change primarily reflected higher provision for losses in the current period, partially offset by higher gains from sales.

          The following table sets forth our real estate investment operational results for the year-to-date periods indicated.

Six Months Ended June 30,


(In Thousands)

2008

2007


Net interest income

$

189

$

724

Other income (loss)

(5,660

)

913

Operating expense

638

668

Net intercompany expense

(68

)

(31

)


Income (loss) before income taxes (tax benefits)

(6,177

)

938

Income taxes (tax benefits)

(2,526

)

368


Net income (loss)

$

(3,651

)

$

570


          Our investments in real estate and joint ventures amounted to $63 million at June 30, 2008, down from $69 million at December 31, 2007, and $65 million at June 30, 2007.

          For information on valuation allowances associated with real estate and joint venture loans, see Allowance for Credit and Real Estate Losses on page 57.

Page 33
Navigation Links

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Loans and Mortgage-Backed Securities

          Total loans and mortgage-backed securities, including those we hold for sale, were virtually unchanged during the current quarter at $10.7 billion or 84.8% of total assets at June 30, 2008. During the quarter loans held for investment increased $15 million while loans held for sale declined $24 million.

          Our loan originations, including loans purchased, totaled $1.027 billion in the current quarter, down $182 million or 15.0% from the $1.209 billion we originated in the year-ago second quarter but 51.9% above the $676 million we originated in the first quarter of 2008. Loans originated for sale declined $283 million or 57.2% from a year ago to $212 million, while single family loans originated for portfolio increased $52 million or 7.4% to $751 million. Our prepayment speed, which measures the annualized percentage of loans repaid, for residential one-to-four unit loans held for investment declined from 37% a year ago to 13% in the current quarter and was down from 16% in the first quarter of 2008. During the current quarter, 61% of our residential one-to-four unit originations represented refinance transactions, including new loans to refinance existing loans which we or other lenders originated. This is down from 78% in the first quarter of 2008 and down from 88% in the year-ago second quarter.

          Not included in the above originations are loans in which we modified the terms of the notes for borrowers. During the current quarter, we modified $320 million of loans associated with our borrower retention program. This program provided borrowers who were current with their loan payments with the opportunity to change from an adjustable rate loan subject to negative amortization to less costly financing alternatives, albeit at new interest rates that were no less than those offered new borrowers. The majority of these modifications were modified into adjustable rate loans whereby the interest rate adjusts semi-annually but does not permit negative amortization. An additional $79 million of loans were modified at below market interest rates in loan workout situations.

          We originate residential one-to-four unit mortgage loans both with and without loan origination fees. In mortgage transactions for which we charge no origination fees, we receive a higher interest rate than those for which we charge origination fees. These loans generally result in deferrable loan origination costs exceeding loan origination fees. A prepayment fee on these loans may be required if these loans are prepaid within the first three years.

          Originations of adjustable rate residential one-to-four unit loans for portfolio, including loans purchased, totaled $748 million in the current quarter, up from $699 million in the year-ago quarter and $435 million in the first quarter of 2008. Of the current quarter total:

Page 34
Navigation Links

          The following table sets forth loans originated, including purchases, for investment and for sale during the periods indicated.

Three Months Ended


June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(In Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Loans originated and purchased

Investment portfolio:

Residential one-to-four units:

Adjustable by index:

COFI

$

1,515

$

7,170

$

77,163

$

101,698

$

55,721

MTA (a)

1,706

740

4,953

(177

)

960

LIBOR

6,562

490

2,102

5,968

253,875

CMT

3,677

1,285

7,572

6,415

29,081

Adjustable – fixed for 3-5 years

734,242

424,939

302,705

317,770

359,030

Fixed

2,876

702

-

588

285


Total residential one-to-four units

750,578

435,326

394,495

432,262

698,952

Other

64,765

3,382

31,682

16,743

14,876


Total for investment portfolio

815,343

438,708

426,177

449,005

713,828

Sale portfolio (b)

211,726

237,356

192,053

244,831

494,871


Total for investment and sale portfolios

$

1,027,069

$

676,064

$

618,230

$

693,836

$

1,208,699


(a) Originations for the quarter ending September 30, 2007 are net of $1.0 million of cancelled loans that were originated in the previous quarter.
(b) All residential one-to-four unit loans.

          The following table sets forth loans originated, including purchases, for investment and for sale during the year-to-date periods indicated.

Six Months Ended June 30,


(In Thousands)

2008

2007


Loans originated and purchased

Investment portfolio:

Residential one-to-four units:

Adjustable by index:

COFI

$

8,685

$

155,503

MTA

2,446

7,798

LIBOR

7,052

377,101

CMT

4,962

60,128

Adjustable – fixed for 3-5 years

1,159,181

701,035

Fixed

3,578

285


Total residential one-to-four units

1,185,904

1,301,850

Other

68,147

32,376


Total for investment portfolio

1,254,051

1,334,226

Sale portfolio (a)

449,082

1,135,540


Total for investment and sale portfolios

$

1,703,133

$

2,469,766


(a) Primarily residential one-to-four unit loans.
Page 35
Navigation Links

          The following table sets forth our investment portfolio of residential one-to-four unit adjustable rate loans by index, excluding our adjustable–fixed for 3-5 year loans which are still in their initial fixed rate period, at the dates indicated.

June 30, 2008

March 31, 2008

December 31, 2007

September 30, 2007

June 30, 2007


% of

% of

% of

% of

% of

(Dollars in Thousands)

Amount

Total

Amount

Total

Amount

Total

Amount

Total

Amount

Total


Loan Investment Portfolio

Residential one-to-four units:

Adjustable by index:

COFI

$

5,599,857

75

%

$

5,893,818

74

%

$

6,383,837

75

%

$

6,899,483

76

%

7,487,290

76

%

MTA

1,047,051

14

1,163,661

15

1,256,672

15

1,398,540

15

1,536,480

16

LIBOR

250,271

3

274,555

3

444,483

5

586,143

7

601,083

6

Other, primarily CMT

588,571

8

595,695

8

394,829

5

204,513

2

228,284

2


Total adjustable loans (a)

$

7,485,750

100

%

$

7,927,729

100

%

$

8,479,821

100

%

$

9,088,679

100

%

$

9,853,137

100

%


(a) Excludes residential one-to-four unit adjustable–fixed for 3-5 year loans still in their initial fixed rate period.

          Our adjustable rate mortgage loans generally:

          Our adjustable rate loans subject to negative amortization, which are no longer offered to borrowers, have an interest rate that adjusts monthly and a minimum monthly loan payment that adjusts annually. The start rate for these loans is lower than the fully-indexed rate and is the rate at which we earned interest for the loan only during the first month. After the first month, interest accrues at the fully-indexed rate. The start rate, however, is used to calculate the minimum monthly loan payment for the first twelve months. The borrower is required to make at least the minimum monthly payment, but retains the option to make a larger payment to reduce loan principal and avoid negative amortization (the addition to loan principal of accrued interest that exceeds the minimum monthly loan payment). If the borrower chooses to make the minimum monthly loan payment, and the interest accrual based on the fully-indexed rate results in monthly interest due exceeding the payment amount, the loan balance will increase by the difference. These payment options were clearly defined in the loan documents signed by the borrower at funding and are explained again on the borrower’s monthly statement.

          More particularly, our adjustable rate loans subject to negative amortization:

          The maximum home loan we currently make for our own portfolio, except for a limited amount related to Community Reinvestment Act ("CRA") activities and loans to facilitate the sale of real estate acquired in settlement of loans, is equal to 80% of a property’s appraised value. If a loan incurs negative amortization, the loan-to-value ratio could rise, which increases credit risk, and the fair value of the underlying collateral could be insufficient to satisfy fully the outstanding loan obligation in the event of a loan default. A loan-to-value ratio is the proportion of the principal amount of the loan to the lower of the sales price or appraised value of the property securing the loan at origination.

Page 36
Navigation Links

          Our loan portfolio held for investment contains loans previously originated with a limit on the maximum loan balance of 125% of the original loan amount. At June 30, 2008, loans with the higher 125% limit on the maximum loan balance represented 2% of our one-to-four unit residential loan portfolio, while those with the 115% limit represented 4% and those with the 110% limit represented 51% of that portfolio. We permit adjustable rate mortgage loans to be assumed by qualified borrowers.

          While start rates of our loan products fluctuate with the market, we do not use them to qualify a loan applicant. Rather, we qualify an applicant for adjustable rate mortgage loans using a fully-amortizing payment calculated from the higher of the fully-indexed rate or, currently, for our:

          At June 30, 2008, $6.2 billion or 57% of our total residential one-to-four unit loans held for investment were subject to negative amortization. The amount of negative amortization included in the loan balance declined $31 million during the quarter to $344 million or 5.5% of loans subject to negative amortization. During current quarter, approximately 15% of our loan interest income represented negative amortization, down from 20% in first quarter and 29% in year-ago second quarter. At origination, these loans had a weighted average loan-to-value ratio of 73%. In addition, $3.9 billion or 36% of our residential one-to-four unit loans held for investment represented loans requiring interest only payments over the initial terms of the loans, generally the first three to five years.

Page 37
Navigation Links

          The following table sets forth our investment portfolio of residential one-to-four unit adjustable rate loans subject to negative amortization and with interest only payments, along with negative amortization included in the loan balance, loan to value ratio information and weighted average age of the loans, at the dates indicated.

Negative

Loan to

Current

Weighted

Amortization

Value

Loan to

Average

Loan

% of

Included in the

Ratio at

Value

Age

(Dollars in Thousands)

Balance

Total

Loan Balance

Origination

Ratio (a)

(Months)


Loan Investment Portfolio

Residential one-to-four units subject to negative amortization:

At June 30, 2008:

With negative amortization:

Balance less than or equal to original loan amount

$

139,647

2

%

$

1,112

71

%

69

%

40

Balance greater than original loan amount

5,440,170

87

343,264

74

79

34


Total with negative amortization

5,579,817

89

344,376

74

79

34

Not utilizing negative amortization

662,589

11

-

69

64

67


Total loans subject to negative amortization

$

6,242,406

100

%

$

344,376

73

%

77

%

38

As a percentage of total residential one-to-four unit loans

57

%


Total loans with interest only payments (b)

$

3,944,035

70

%

71

%

19

As a percentage of total residential one-to-four unit loans

36

%


At December 31 2007:

With negative amortization:

Balance less than or equal to original loan amount

$

189,508

3

%

$

1,253

70

%

69

%

37

Balance greater than original loan amount

6,501,649

86

377,411

74

78

29


Total with negative amortization

6,691,157

89

378,664

74

78

30

Not utilizing negative amortization

839,433

11

-

69

65

55


Total loans subject to negative amortization

$

7,530,590

100

%

$

378,664

73

%

77

%

32

As a percentage of total residential one-to-four unit loans

69

%


Total loans with interest only payments

$

2,745,117

70

%

70

%

16

As a percentage of total residential one-to-four unit loans

25

%


At June 30, 2007:

With negative amortization:

Balance less than or equal to original loan amount

$

272,216

3

%

$

1,467

70

%

68

%

36

Balance greater than original loan amount

7,752,141

87

375,860

74

77

25


Total with negative amortization

8,024,357

90

377,327

74

77

25

Not utilizing negative amortization

890,091

10

-

69

65

53


Total loans subject to negative amortization

$

8,914,448

100

%

$

377,327

73

%

76

%

28

As a percentage of total residential one-to-four unit loans

76

%


Total loans with interest only payments

$

2,258,102

69

%

68

%

11

As a percentage of total residential one-to-four unit loans

19

%


(a) Based on current loan balance relative to the lower of the appraised value or sales price at time of origination. (b) Loans with interest only payments include loans modified with previously capitalized interest due to negative amortization.

          Our adjustable rate loans subject to negative amortization require a payment recast every five years and additionally when the loan balance reaches the maximum permissible level of negative amortization, while interest only loans require a payment recast when the initial fixed rate or interest only period expires. At payment recast, the fully-indexed interest rate is used to calculate a new monthly loan payment that provides for full amortization of the loan balance over the remaining term of the loan. Generally, the new loan payment is significantly higher and therefore default risk typically increases. We have other adjustable rate loans that also are subject to payment recasts but the new loan payments are not likely to be as severe as those associated with loans subject to negative amortization or interest only payments because the original loan payments already include principal amortization.

Page 38
Navigation Links

          The following table sets forth projected first-time loan payment recasts for our investment portfolio of residential one-to-four unit adjustable rate loans subject to negative amortization and loans with interest only payments for two consecutive quarters starting with the third quarter of 2008 and annually thereafter through 2011. To determine projected first-time loan payment recasts, we assumed that borrowers will continue to utilize negative amortization at the same rate as they did in the preceding 12 months and no loans prepay. Therefore, the projected recast amounts may be overstated as some portion of these loans is likely to prepay or be modified as part of our borrower retention or loan workout programs. For example, at the end of the first quarter of 2008, we forecasted that $825 million of loans subject to negative amortization and loans with interest only payments would recast for the first-time during the second quarter of 2008, of which $521 million did recast while:

          

Projected First-Time Loan Recasts at June 30, 2008 for


3rd Quarter

4th Quarter

Year Ended

Year Ended

Year Ended

(Dollars in Thousands)

2008

2008

2009

2010

2011


Loan Investment Portfolio

Residential one-to-four units:

Loans subject to negative amortization

$

442,634

$

472,013

$

1,496,925

$

1,131,213

$

702,830

Loans with interest only payments

11,639

1,908

160,866

30,762

1,244,521

All other loans (a)

5,591

396

10,306

10,532

181,926


Total

$

459,864

$

474,317

$

1,668,097

$

1,172,507

$

2,129,277

As a percentage of total residential

one-to-four unit loans

4

%

4

%

15

%

11

%

20

%


(a) Represents fully-amortizing adjustable rate loans.
Page 39
Navigation Links

          At June 30, 2008, 11% of our residential one-to-four unit loans were originated in 2008, with an additional 16% in 2007, and 25% in 2006, which are relatively new and unseasoned. The following table sets forth our investment portfolio of residential one-to-four unit loans by year of origination segregated by those subject to negative amortization, those with interest only payments and all others at the dates indicated. From year to year, loans may change categories due to modification.

Loans by Year of Origination


(Dollars in Thousands)

2004 and Prior

2005

2006

2007

2008

Balance


Loan Investment Portfolio

Residential one-to-four units:

At June 30, 2008:

Loans subject to negative amortization

$

1,628,889

$

2,466,775

$

1,695,938

$

415,397

$

35,407

$

6,242,406

Hybrid adjustable rate loans:

Interest only payments

115,135

55,939

856,537

1,036,051

951,048

3,014,710

Fully amortizing

89,170

74,166

60,502

85,920

163,526

473,284


Total hybrid adjustable rate loans

204,305

130,105

917,039

1,121,971

1,114,574

3,487,994

Non-hybrid interest only loans

186,507

418,031

168,103

144,764

11,920

929,325

All other loans (a)

148,374

30,257

16,306

35,830

4,397

235,164


Total residential one-to-four units

$

2,168,075

$

3,045,168

$

2,797,386

$

1,717,962

$

1,166,298

$

10,894,889

As a percentage of total residential

one-to-four unit loans

20

%

28

%

25

%

16

%

11

%

100

%


2004 and Prior

2005

2006

2007

2008

Balance


At June 30, 2007:

Loans subject to negative amortization

$

2,860,746

$

3,799,307

$

2,096,763

$

157,632

$

-

$

8,914,448

Hybrid adjustable rate loans:

Interest only payments

134,325

4,992

937,147

662,231

-

1,738,695

Fully amortizing

92,930

-

55,561

32,041

-

180,532


Total hybrid adjustable rate loans

227,255

4,992

992,708

694,272

-

1,919,227

Non-hybrid interest only loans

51,320

2,598

188,952

276,537

-

519,407

All other loans (a)

169,798

11,159

23,703

156,893

-

361,553


Total residential one-to-four units

$

3,309,119

$

3,818,056

$

3,302,126

$

1,285,334

$

-

$

11,714,635

As a percentage of total residential

one-to-four unit loans

28

%

33

%

28

%

11

%

-

%

100

%


(a) Represents fully-amortizing adjustable rate loans and fixed rate loans.
Page 40
Navigation Links

          At June 30, 2008, 90% of our residential one-to-four unit loans were concentrated and secured by properties located in California. The following table sets forth the major geographic distribution of our investment portfolio of residential one-to-four unit loans at the dates indicated.

June 30,


2008

2007


% of

% of

(Dollars in Thousands)

Amount

Total

Amount

Total


Loan Investment Portfolio

Residential one-to-four units:

California county:

Los Angeles

$

2,062,688

19

%

$

2,126,053

18

%

San Diego

1,237,241

11

1,335,618

11

Santa Clara

1,035,525

10

959,974

8

Orange

896,434

8

921,658

8

Alameda

541,884

5

582,085

5

Riverside

491,609

5

589,984

5

Contra Costa

462,397

4

521,624

4

San Mateo

328,712

3

308,472

3

San Bernardino

322,468

3

359,320

3

Sacramento

294,898

3

352,919

3

All other counties

2,108,679

19

2,311,808

21


Total California

9,782,535

90

10,369,515

89

Arizona

444,364

4

490,346

4

All other states

667,990

6

854,374

7


Total residential one-to-four units

$

10,894,889

100

%

$

11,714,235

100

%


          The following table sets forth our investment portfolio of residential one-to-four unit loans by the Fair Isaac Corporation credit score model ("FICO") of the borrower at origination at the dates indicated.

June 30, 2008

March 31, 2008

December 31, 2007

September 30, 2007

June 30, 2007


% of

% of

% of

% of

% of

(Dollars in Thousands)

Amount

Total

Amount

Total

Amount

Total

Amount

Total

Amount

Total


Loan Investment Portfolio

Residential one-to-four units:

FICO score at Origination:

620 or below

$

361,879

3

%

$

384,320

4

%

$

407,764

4

%

$

443,748

4

%

$

487,877

4

%

621 to 659

2,348,417

22

2,463,700

23

2,573,185

24

2,697,313

24

2,868,183

25

660 to 719

4,034,572

37

4,046,287

38

4,122,326

38

4,232,819

38

4,417,141

38

720 and above

4,020,953

37

3,683,490

34

3,630,721

33

3,705,685

33

3,787,318

32

Not available

129,068

1

134,438

1

143,232

1

147,996

1

154,116

1


Total residential one-to-four units

$

10,894,889

100

%

$

10,712,235

100

%

$

10,877,228

100

%

$

11,227,561

100

%

$

11,714,635

100

%


Weighted average FICO score for

loan investment portfolio of

residential one-to-four units

702

698

697

696

695


Page 41
Navigation Links

          The following table sets forth our investment portfolio of residential one-to-four unit loans by original loan-to-value ratio at the dates indicated. For this table, the loan-to-value ratios have been updated to reflect the current loan balance and, if private mortgage insurance has been removed, a current appraisal.

June 30, 2008

March 31, 2008

December 31, 2007

September 30, 2007

June 30, 2007


% of

% of

% of

% of

% of

(Dollars in Thousands)

Amount

Total

Amount

Total

Amount

Total

Amount

Total

Amount

Total


Loan Investment Portfolio

Residential one-to-four units:

80% or below:

60% or less

$

1,590,553

15

%

$

1,504,295

14

%

$

1,539,989

14

%

$

1,628,047

14

%

$

1,751,248

15

%

61% to 70%

2,111,314

19

1,972,543

18

1,931,397

18

1,966,339

18

2,067,210

18

71% to 80%

6,711,241

61

6,717,851

63

6,866,261

63

7,067,710

63

7,311,692

62


Total 80% or below

10,413,108

95

10,194,689

95

10,337,647

95

10,662,096

95

11,130,150

95

81% to 85%:

With private mortgage insurance:

MGIC

8,928

8,923

7,805

7,782

6,855

RMIC

38,260

40,032

42,231

42,630

44,052

UGI

27,507

29,176

31,131

32,290

35,377

All others

1,260

1,448

1,452

1,786

2,076


Total with private mortgage

insurance

75,955

1

79,579

1

82,619

1

84,488

1

88,360

1

Without private mortgage insurance

2,991

-

2,805

-

1,728

-

1,145

-

1,161

-


Total 81% to 85%

78,946

1

82,384

1

84,347

1

85,633

1

89,521

1

86% to 89%:

With private mortgage insurance:

MGIC

20,134

20,552

19,563

21,252

21,216

RMIC

94,284

104,558

107,673

111,908

116,674

UGI

45,249

50,402

53,423

55,757

59,447

All others

4,351

4,941

4,959

6,051

6,913


Total with private mortgage

insurance

164,018

2

180,453

2

185,618

2

194,968

2

204,250

2

Without private mortgage insurance

4,457

-

4,532

-

4,624

-

4,355

-

4,407

-


Total 86% to 89%

168,475

2

184,985

2

190,242

2

199,323

2

208,657

2

90% and above:

With private mortgage insurance

MGIC

18,864

19,348

19,981

22,614

21,913

RMIC

113,895

126,184

132,823

140,568

143,101

UGI

62,172

66,047

73,066

77,989

83,373

All others

6,622

7,179

7,398

8,587

9,414


Total with private mortgage

insurance

201,553

2

218,758

2

233,268

2

249,758

2

257,801

2

Without private mortgage insurance (a)

30,114

-

28,534

-

28,778

-

27,786

-

25,277

-


Total 90% and above

231,667

2

247,292

2

262,046

2

277,544

2

283,078

2

Not available

2,693

-

2,885

-

2,946

-

2,965

-

3,229

-


Total residential one-to-four units

$

10,894,889

100

%

$

10,712,235

100

%

$

10,877,228

100

%

$

11,227,561

100

%

$

11,714,635

100

%


Weighted average loan-to-value ratio

for loan investment portfolio of

residential one-to-four units

72

72

72

73

72


(a) Primarily related to Community Reinvestment Act activities.

          In addition to the other credit risks already identified, 77% of our residential one-to-four unit loans held for investment at June 30, 2008 were underwritten based on borrower stated income and asset verification and an additional 6% were underwritten with no verification of either borrower income or assets. In April 2008, we changed our guidelines to no longer permit stated income programs for portfolio loans.

Page 42
Navigation Links

          Credit risks are mitigated primarily by various minimum borrower credit requirements and maximum loan-to-value ratio limitations. For example, at June 30, 2008, the average loan-to-value ratio at origination of our residential one-to-four unit loan portfolio was 72%. However, even with these requirements and limitations, our risk mitigation strategy is limited by potential defects in the underwriting process as well as potential changes in the loan-to-value ratio due to negative amortization and declines in home values after the loans were originated. For example, while residential property values increased in the past thereby further reducing our exposure to credit risk, home value declines emerged in 2006 and are continuing in most markets in which we lend. The uncertainty of future home value changes may materially impact the risk associated with our loan portfolio since 52% of these loans were originated after 2005.

          We originated $3 million of home equity loans and lines of credit in the current quarter, up from $2 million in the first quarter of 2008 but unchanged from the year-ago second quarter. During the current quarter, we originated $24 million of residential five or more unit loans, compared to none in the first quarter of 2008 and $1 million in the year-ago second quarter. During the current quarter we originated $36 million of construction loans, of which $34 million related to 2 shopping centers, up from less than $1 million in the first quarter of 2008 and $2 million in the year-ago second quarter. Consumer loan originations totaled less than $1 million in the current quarter, down from $1 million in the first quarter of 2008 and year-ago second quarter.

          At June 30, 2008, our unfunded loan application pipeline totaled $907 million. Within that pipeline, we had commitments to borrowers for short-term interest rate locks, before the reduction of expected fallout, of $460 million, of which $78 million were related to residential one-to-four unit loans being originated for sale in the secondary market. Furthermore, we had commitments for undrawn lines of credit of $205 million and loans in process of $73 million. We believe our current sources of funds will be adequate relative to these obligations.

Page 43
Navigation Links

          The following table sets forth the origination, purchase and sale activity relating to our loans and mortgage-backed securities for the quarters indicated.

Three Months Ended


June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(In Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Investment Portfolio

Loans originated:

Loans secured by real estate:

Residential one-to-four units:

Adjustable

$

13,460

$

9,685

$

92,109

$

113,585

$

339,637

Adjustable – fixed for 3-5 years

734,242

424,939

302,386

318,089

359,030

Fixed

2,876

702

-

588

285


Total residential one-to-four units

750,578

435,326

394,495

432,262

698,952

Home equity loans and lines of credit

3,322

2,019

2,268

3,048

3,365

Residential five or more units – adjustable

24,345

-

-

-

750


Total residential

778,245

437,345

396,763

435,310

703,067

Commercial real estate

-

-

-

-

1,350

Construction

36,478

275

28,524

11,551

2,187

Land

161

41

103

135

5,661

Non-mortgage:

Commercial

-

305

-

300

500

Consumer

459

742

787

1,709

1,063


Total loans originated

815,343

438,708

426,177

449,005

713,828

Loan repayments

(412,751

)

(552,942

)

(747,862

)

(979,625

)

(1,489,999

)

Other net changes (a)

(388,083

)

(302,423

)

(247,000

)

(71,735

)

38,334


Increase (decrease) in loans held for investment, net

14,509

(416,657

)

(568,685

)

(602,355

)

(737,837

)


Sale Portfolio

Residential one-to-four unit loans:

Originated

210,055

236,568

190,816

240,423

494,045

Purchased

1,671

788

1,237

4,408

826

Loans transferred to the investment portfolio (a)

(1,077

)

(123

)

(579

)

(6,669

)

(658

)

Originated whole loans sold

(398

)

(1,505

)

(1,999

)

(93,774

)

(231,980

)

Loans exchanged for mortgage-backed securities (b)

(234,715

)

(227,482

)

(173,909

)

(243,546

)

(337,960

)

Capitalized basis adjustment (c)

920

(1,243

)

(208

)

2,103

(1,266

)

Other net changes (d)

(151

)

(1,134

)

(2,202

)

(469

)

(3,117

)


Increase (decrease) in loans held for sale, net

(23,695

)

5,869

13,156

(97,524

)

(80,110

)


Mortgage-backed securities, net:

Received in exchange for loans (b)

234,715

227,482

173,909

243,546

337,960

Sold (b)

(234,715

)

(227,482

)

(173,909

)

(243,546

)

(337,960

)

Repayments

(3

)

(2

)

(1

)

(2

)

(3

)

Other net changes

-

-

-

-

-


Decrease in mortgage-backed securities

available for sale

(3

)

(2

)

(1

)

(2

)

(3

)


Increase (decrease) in loans held for sale and

mortgage-backed securities available for sale

(23,698

)

5,867

13,155

(97,526

)

(80,113

)


Total decrease in loans and

mortgage-backed securities, net

$

(9,189

)

$

(410,790

)

$

(555,530

)

$

(699,881

)

$

(817,950

)


(a) Primarily included changes in undisbursed funds for lines of credit and construction loans, in loss allowances, in net deferred costs and premiums, in interest capitalized on loans (negative amortization), and from loans transferred to real estate acquired in settlement of loans or from (to) the held for sale portfolio.
(b) These transactions typically involve creation of an MBS by a government sponsored entity (GSE) from loans sold by, and delivered by, us to the GSE. While the GSE is obligated to provide us with the MBS in exchange for the sold loans, the GSE typically fulfills this commitment through delivery of the MBS directly to the third-party purchaser based on a forward sales commitment made by us to that third party. The sales of both the loans and MBS are settled typically on a same-day basis such that we do not retain the MBS. If the MBS were to be retained with an intent to sell, we would classify the security as held for trading and record changes in fair value in our consolidated statement of income.
(c) Reflected the change in fair value of the interest rate lock derivative from the date of rate lock to the date of funding. Effective January 2008, we included the fair value of MSRs in the fair value of interest rate lock derivatives in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 109, Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings.
(d) Primarily included repayments and the change in net deferred costs and premiums.
Page 44
Navigation Links

          The following table sets forth the composition of our loan and mortgage-backed securities portfolios at the dates indicated.

June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(In Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Investment Portfolio

Loans secured by real estate:

Residential one-to-four units:

Adjustable

$

7,343,057

$

7,781,332

$

8,302,538

$

8,999,273

$

9,750,788

Adjustable – fixed for 3-5 years

3,504,702

2,884,877

2,528,287

2,180,099

1,916,107

Fixed

47,130

46,026

46,403

48,189

47,740


Total residential one-to-four units

10,894,889

10,712,235

10,877,228

11,227,561

11,714,635

Home equity loans and lines of credit

131,531

133,338

138,305

143,948

154,980

Residential five or more units:

Adjustable

120,565

99,522

100,098

103,798

107,416

Fixed

838

852

865

874

886

Commercial real estate:

Adjustable

21,562

23,651

23,837

23,966

24,092

Fixed

1,071

1,098

2,590

2,632

2,675

Construction

105,991

74,730

81,098

58,231

52,699

Land

10,524

10,373

49,521

50,864

64,262

Non-mortgage:

Commercial

5,505

5,305

5,000

5,000

2,700

Consumer

5,823

5,934

5,989

6,057

6,346


Total loans held for investment

11,298,299

11,067,038

11,284,531

11,622,931

12,130,691

Increase (decrease) for:

Undisbursed loan funds

(74,228

)

(51,595

)

(60,057

)

(48,063

)

(42,486

)

Net deferred costs and premiums

139,295

147,811

156,853

169,195

185,102

Allowance for losses

(732,354

)

(546,751

)

(348,167

)

(142,218

)

(69,107

)


Total loans held for investment, net

10,631,012

10,616,503

11,033,160

11,601,845

12,204,200


Sale Portfolio

Loans held for sale:

Residential one-to-four units

85,854

110,685

103,320

89,794

189,189

Net deferred costs and premiums

(146

)

(362

)

(109

)

53

285

Capitalized basis adjustment (a)

(150

)

(1,070

)

173

381

(1,722

)


Total loans held for sale, net

85,558

109,253

103,384

90,228

187,752

Mortgage-backed securities available for sale:

Adjustable

106

109

111

112

114

Fixed

-

-

-

-

-


Total mortgage-backed securities available for sale

106

109

111

112

114


Total loans held for sale and mortgage-backed

securities available for sale

85,664

109,362

103,495

90,340

187,866


Total loans and mortgage-backed securities, net

$

10,716,676

$

10,725,865

$

11,136,655

$

11,692,185

$

12,392,066


(a) Reflected the change in fair value of the interest rate lock derivative from the date of rate lock to the date of funding. Effective January 2008, we included the fair value of MSRs in the fair value of the interest rate lock derivatives in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 109, Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings.

          We carry loans for sale at the lower of cost or fair value. At June 30, 2008, no valuation allowance was required as the fair value exceeded book value on an aggregate basis.

          We carry mortgage-backed securities available for sale at fair value which, at June 30, 2008, was essentially equal to our cost basis.

Page 45
Navigation Links

Investment Securities

          The following table sets forth the composition of our investment securities portfolios at the dates indicated.

June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(In Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Federal funds and interest earning due from banks

$

11,060

$

-

$

5,900

$

1,551

$

-

Investment securities available for sale:

U.S. Treasury

-

-

-

-

-

Government sponsored entities

998,396

1,603,039

1,549,818

2,142,216

1,917,541

Other

61

61

61

62

62


Total investment securities

$

1,009,517

$

1,603,100

$

1,555,779

$

2,143,829

$

1,917,603


          The fair value of temporarily impaired investment securities, the amount of unrealized losses and the length of time these unrealized losses existed as of June 30, 2008 are presented in the following table. The $3 million unrealized loss on investment securities that have been in a loss position for less than 12 months is due to changes in market interest rates and is not considered to be other than temporary. We have the intent and ability to hold the securities until that temporary impairment is eliminated.

Less than 12 months

12 months or longer

Total


Unrealized

Unrealized

Unrealized

(In Thousands)

Fair Value

Losses

Fair Value

Losses

Fair Value

Losses


Investment securities available for sale:

U.S. Treasury

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

Government sponsored entities

246,978

3,023

-

-

246,978

3,023


Total temporarily impaired securities

$

246,978

$

3,023

$

-

$

-

$

246,978

$

3,023


          The following table sets forth the maturities of our investment securities and their weighted average yields at June 30, 2008.

Amount Due as of June 30, 2008


In 1 Year

After 1 Year

After 5 Years

After

(Dollars in Thousands)

or Less

Through 5 Years

Through 10 Years

10 Years

Total


Federal funds and interest earning due

from banks

$

11,060

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

11,060

Weighted average yield

2.34

%

-

%

-

%

-

%

2.34

%

Investment securities available for sale:

U.S. Treasury

-

-

-

-

-

Weighted average yield

-

%

-

%

-

%

-

%

-

%

Government sponsored entities (a)

-

751,418

99,111

147,867

998,396

Weighted average yield

-

%

5.02

%

4.40

%

4.68

%

4.91

%

Other

-

-

-

61

61

Weighted average yield

-

%

-

%

-

%

6.25

%

6.25

%


Total investment securities

$

11,060

$

751,418

$

99,111

$

147,928

$

1,009,517

Weighted average yield

2.34

%

5.02

%

4.40

%

4.68

%

4.88

%


(a) At June 30, 2008, 25% of our investment securities had step-up provisions that stipulate increases in the coupon rate ranging from 0.25% to 1.43% at various specified dates ranging from February 2011 to February 2020. In addition, at June 30, 2008, all of these investment securities contained call provisions from June 2008 to November 2022. Yields for investment securities available for sale are calculated using historical cost balances and are not adjusted for changes in fair value that are reflected as a separate component of stockholders’ equity.

Deposits

          At June 30, 2008, our deposits totaled $9.9 billion, down $1.4 billion or 12.1% from the year-ago level and $615 million or 5.9% from year-end 2007. Compared with the year-ago period, certificates of deposit declined $1.1 billion or 12.9% and our transaction accounts (i.e., checking, money market and regular passbook) declined $240 million or 9.5%. Within our transaction accounts, checking accounts declined $136 million and regular passbook accounts declined $149 million. Of the decline in checking, $82 million reflected the decline in custodial accounts related to loan servicing reflecting the concurrent decline in loan prepayments.

Page 46
Navigation Links

          At June 30, 2008, our total number of branches was 174, of which 169 were located in California and five were located in Arizona. The average deposit size of our 84 traditional branches was $94 million, while the average deposit size of our 90 in-store branches was $22 million.

          The following table sets forth information concerning our deposits and weighted average rates paid at the dates indicated.

June 30, 2008

March 31, 2008

December 31, 2007

September 30, 2007

June 30, 2007


Weighted

Weighted

Weighted

Weighted

Weighted

Average

Average

Average

Average

Average

(Dollars in Thousands)

Rate

Amount

Rate

Amount

Rate

Amount

Rate

Amount

Rate

Amount


Transaction accounts:

Non-interest-bearing

checking (a)

-

%

$

664,895

-

%

$

673,717

-

%

$

645,730

-

%

$

679,148

-

%

$

767,694

Interest-bearing

checking (a)

0.27

443,801

0.29

467,051

0.27

464,980

0.27

462,973

0.27

476,884

Money market

1.47

185,036

1.04

137,745

1.04

134,640

1.04

138,256

1.04

140,143

Regular passbook

0.93

1,002,450

0.93

1,033,302

0.95

1,035,964

0.95

1,071,728

0.95

1,151,308


Total transaction

accounts

0.58

2,296,182

0.54

2,311,815

0.55

2,281,314

0.55

2,352,105

0.54

2,536,029

Certificates of deposit:

Less than 2.00%

1.27

26,765

1.28

26,374

1.25

21,915

1.28

20,070

1.29

20,875

2.00-2.49

2.45

475,931

2.44

118,716

2.31

148

2.33

163

2.27

322

2.50-2.99

2.92

1,927,169

2.90

370,206

2.83

6,889

2.83

8,068

2.83

8,586

3.00-3.49

3.23

1,715,721

3.29

1,094,117

3.28

72,288

3.28

87,110

3.29

96,880

3.50-3.99

3.76

776,072

3.75

894,761

3.86

43,481

3.84

49,390

3.87

86,557

4.00-4.49

4.24

557,160

4.23

618,422

4.29

306,302

4.26

189,990

4.26

240,373

4.50-4.99

4.80

1,845,236

4.81

4,061,873

4.85

6,026,108

4.91

5,225,991

4.91

4,615,314

5.00-5.49

5.07

260,735

5.09

747,306

5.10

1,736,673

5.11

2,728,452

5.15

3,391,831

5.50 and greater

6.06

7

6.06

699

6.00

923

5.82

1,279

5.55

250,039


Total certificates

of deposit

3.67

7,584,796

4.33

7,932,474

4.85

8,214,727

4.93

8,310,513

4.96

8,710,777


Total deposits

2.95

%

$

9,880,978

3.47

%

$

10,244,289

3.92

%

$

10,496,041

3.96

%

$

10,662,618

3.97

%

$

11,246,806


(a) Included amounts swept into money market deposit accounts.

Borrowings

          At June 30, 2008, our borrowings totaled $1.8 billion, down $69 million from a year ago but up $426 million from year-end 2007, partially to cover deposit outflows. At quarter end, we had borrowed $98 million through transactions in which securities were sold under agreements to repurchase, compared to $588 million for the same period a year ago. These repurchase agreements are entered into with selected major securities dealers, using securities of government sponsored entities from our portfolio as collateral. Partially offsetting the decline in securities sold under agreements to purchase was a $421 million increase in FHLB advances to $1.5 billion.

          The following table sets forth information concerning our FHLB advances and other borrowings at the dates indicated.

June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(Dollars in Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

$

97,838

$

103,000

$

-

$

566,350

$

587,544

Federal Home Loan Bank advances (a)

1,525,034

1,434,602

1,197,100

1,308,867

1,104,373

Senior notes

198,543

198,494

198,445

198,398

198,351


Total borrowings

$

1,821,415

$

1,736,096

$

1,395,545

$

2,073,615

$

1,890,268


Weighted average rate on borrowings during

the quarter (a)

3.73

%

4.74

%

5.80

%

5.94

%

6.00

%

Total borrowings as a percentage of total assets

14.42

13.22

10.41

14.38

12.68


(a) Included the impact of interest rate swap contracts, with notional amounts totaling $430 million of receive-fixed, pay-3-month LIBOR variable interest, which contracts serve as a permitted hedge against a portion of our FHLB advances.
Page 47
Navigation Links

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

          We consolidate majority-owned subsidiaries that we control. We account for other affiliates, including joint ventures, in which we do not exhibit significant control or have majority ownership, by the equity method of accounting. For those relationships in which we own less than 20%, we generally carry them at cost. In the course of our business, we participate in real estate joint ventures through our wholly-owned subsidiary, DSL Service Company. Our real estate joint ventures do not require consolidation as a result of applying the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation 46 (revised December 2003).

          We utilize financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments include commitments to originate fixed and variable rate mortgage loans held for investment, undisbursed loan funds, lines and letters of credit, commitments to purchase loans and mortgage-backed securities for our portfolio and commitments to invest in community development funds. The contract or notional amounts of these instruments reflect the extent of involvement we have in particular classes of financial instruments. For further information, see Asset/Liability Management and Market Risk on page 48 and Note 3 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 10.

          We use the same credit policies in making commitments to originate or purchase loans, lines of credit and letters of credit as we do for on-balance sheet instruments. For commitments to originate loans held for investment, the contract amounts represent exposure to loss from market fluctuations as well as credit loss. In regard to these commitments, adverse changes from market fluctuations are generally not hedged. We control the credit risk of our commitments to originate loans held for investment through credit approvals, limits and monitoring procedures.

          We do not dispose of loans or assets by means of unconsolidated special purpose entities.

Transactions with Related Parties

          There are no significant related party transactions required to be disclosed in accordance with FASB Statement No. 57, Related Party Disclosures. Loans to our executive officers and directors were made in the ordinary course of business and were made on substantially the same terms as comparable transactions.

Asset/Liability Management and Market Risk

          Market risk is the risk of loss or reduced earnings from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. Our market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk in our lending and deposit taking activities. Interest rate risk primarily occurs to the degree that our interest-bearing liabilities reprice or mature on a different basis and frequency than our interest-earning assets. Since our earnings depend primarily on our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest and dividends earned on interest-earning assets and the interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities, our principal objectives are to actively monitor and manage the effects of adverse changes in interest rates on net interest income. Our primary strategy in managing interest rate risk is to emphasize the origination for investment of adjustable rate mortgage loans or loans with relatively short maturities. Interest rates on adjustable rate mortgage loans are primarily tied to COFI, MTA, LIBOR and CMT. We also may execute swap contracts to change interest rate characteristics of our interest-earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities to better manage interest rate risk.

          In addition to the interest rate risk associated with our lending for investment and deposit-taking activities, we also have market risk associated with our secondary marketing activities. Changes in mortgage interest rates, primarily fixed rate mortgage loans, impact the fair value of loans held for sale as well as our interest rate lock commitment derivatives, where we have committed to an interest rate with a potential borrower for a loan we intend to sell. Our objective is to hedge against fluctuations in interest rates through the use of loan forward sale and purchase contracts with government-sponsored enterprises and whole loan sale contracts with various other parties. These contracts are typically obtained at or about the time the interest rate lock commitments are made. Therefore, as interest rates fluctuate, the changes in the fair value of our interest rate lock commitments and loans held for sale tend to be offset by changes in the fair value of the hedge contracts. We continue to hedge as previously done before the issuance of SFAS 133. As applied to our risk management strategies, SFAS 133 may increase or decrease reported net income and stockholders’ equity, depending on interest rates and other variables affecting the fair values of derivative instruments and hedged items, but will have no effect on the overall economics of the transactions. The method used for assessing the effectiveness of a hedging derivative, as well as the measurement approach for determining the ineffective aspects of the hedge, is established at the inception of the hedge. We generally do not enter into derivative contracts for speculative purposes.

Page 48
Navigation Links

          Changes in mortgage interest rates also impact the value of our MSRs. Rising interest rates typically result in slower prepayment speeds on the loans being serviced for others which increase the value of MSRs. Declining interest rates typically result in faster prepayment speeds which decrease the value of MSRs. Over time, we may use derivatives or securities to provide an economic hedge against value changes in our MSRs.

Page 49
Navigation Links

          One measure of our exposure to differential changes in interest rates between assets and liabilities is shown in the following table which sets forth the repricing frequency of our major asset and liability categories as of June 30, 2008, as well as other information regarding the repricing and maturity differences between our interest-earning assets and total deposits and borrowings in future periods. We refer to these differences as “gap.” We have determined the repricing frequencies by reference to projected maturities, based upon contractual maturities as adjusted for scheduled repayments and “repricing mechanisms”—provisions for changes in the interest and dividend rates of assets and liabilities. Prepayment rates on substantially our entire loan portfolio are based upon anticipated future prepayment behavior as derived from external models of loans with similar characteristics. Repricing mechanisms on a number of our assets are subject to limitations, such as caps on the amount that interest rates and payments on our loans may adjust, and accordingly, these assets may not respond to changes in market interest rates as completely or rapidly as our liabilities. The interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities illustrated in the following table would vary substantially if we used different assumptions or if actual experience differed from the assumptions set forth.

June 30, 2008


After 6 Months

After 1 Year

After 5 Years

Within

Through 12

Through 5

Through 10

Beyond

Total

(Dollars in Thousands)

6 Months

Months

Years

Years

10 Years

Balance


Interest-earning assets:

Investment securities and stock (a)

$

790,957

$

273,809

$

12,504

$

-

$

-

$

1,077,270

Loans and mortgage-backed securities: (b)

Loans secured by real estate:

Residential one-to-four units:

Adjustable

7,280,354

441,961

2,549,948

-

-

10,272,263

Fixed

77,842

2,706

16,941

12,544

11,694

121,727

Home equity loans and lines of credit

130,090

69

378

168

-

130,705

Residential five or more units:

Adjustable

72,821

15,519

20,036

-

-

108,376

Fixed

43

38

371

218

160

830

Commercial real estate

18,433

2,007

1,383

74

-

21,897

Construction

43,440

-

-

-

-

43,440

Land

7,813

-

-

-

-

7,813

Non-mortgage loans:

Commercial

4,011

-

-

-

-

4,011

Consumer

5,508

-

-

-

-

5,508

Mortgage-backed securities

106

-

-

-

-

106


Total loans and mortgage-backed securities, net

7,640,461

462,300

2,589,057

13,004

11,854

10,716,676


Total interest-earning assets

$

8,431,418

$

736,109

$

2,601,561

$

13,004

$

11,854

$

11,793,946


Transaction accounts:

Non-interest-bearing checking (c)

$

664,895

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

664,895

Interest-bearing checking (d)

443,801

-

-

-

-

443,801

Money market (e)

185,036

-

-

-

-

185,036

Regular passbook (e)

1,002,450

-

-

-

-

1,002,450


Total transaction accounts

2,296,182

-

-

-

-

2,296,182

Certificates of deposit (f)

6,593,957

686,690

304,149

-

-

7,584,796


Total deposits

8,890,139

686,690

304,149

-

-

9,880,978

FHLB advances and other borrowings (g)

1,322,872

-

300,000

-

-

1,622,872

Senior notes

-

-

-

198,543

-

198,543

Impact of swap contracts hedging borrowings

430,000

(430,000

)

-

-

-

-


Total deposits and borrowings

$

10,643,011

$

256,690

$

604,149

$

198,543

$

-

$

11,702,393


Excess (shortfall) of interest-earning assets

over deposits and borrowings

$

(2,211,593

)

$

479,419

$

1,997,412

$

(185,539

)

$

11,854

$

91,553

Cumulative gap

(2,211,593

)

(1,732,174

)

265,238

79,699

91,553

Cumulative gap – as a percentage of total assets:

June 30, 2008

(17.51

)%

(13.71

)%

2.10

%

0.63

%

0.72

%

December 31, 2007

3.59

(2.96

)

7.85

6.46

6.50

June 30, 2007

0.24

(6.80

)

9.54

8.30

8.35


(a) Includes FHLB stock and is based on contractual maturity and repricing/call date.
(b) Based on contractual maturity, repricing date and projected repayment and prepayments of principal.
(c) Even though no interest is paid on these accounts, they are classified as repricing within six months, which increases negative gap.
(d) Includes amounts swept into money market deposit accounts and is subject to immediate repricing.
(e) Subject to immediate repricing.
(f) Based on contractual maturity.
(g) Excludes embedded interest rate caps with a notional amount of $50 million and a three-month LIBOR strike rate equal to 5.50%.
Page 50
Navigation Links

          Our six-month gap at June 30, 2008 was a negative 17.51%. This means more deposits and borrowings mature or reprice within six months than total interest-earning assets. This compares to our positive six-month gap of 3.59% at December 31, 2007 and 0.24% a year ago, which reflected more interest-earning assets repricing within six months than total deposits and borrowings. The change since year-end 2007 from a positive to negative gap is primarily due to an increase of adjustable rate loans with interest rates fixed for the first 3 to 5 years without a commensurate increase in the maturities for our FHLB advances and certificates of deposit.

          We continue to emphasize the origination of adjustable rate mortgages for our investment portfolio, which includes our adjustable – fixed for 3-5 years loans that carry a fixed interest rate for a period of three to five years then adjust semi-annually or annually thereafter. For the twelve months ended June 30, 2008, we originated and purchased for investment $2.1 billion of adjustable rate loans, of which $1.8 billion or 84% were adjustable – fixed for 3-5 years loans, which represented essentially all of the loans we originated and purchased for investment during the period.

          At June 30, 2008, December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2007 essentially all of our interest-earning assets mature, reprice or are estimated to prepay within five years. Essentially all of our loans held for investment and mortgage-backed securities portfolios consisted of adjustable rate loans and loans with a due date of five years or less, and totaled $11.3 billion at June 30, 2008 compared with $11.2 billion at December 31, 2007 and $12.1 billion a year ago. During the current quarter, we continued to offer residential fixed rate loan products to our customers primarily for sale in the secondary market. We originate fixed rate loans primarily for sale in the secondary market and price them accordingly to create loan servicing income and to increase opportunities for originating adjustable rate mortgage loans. However, we may originate fixed rate loans for investment if these loans meet specific yield, interest rate risk and other approved guidelines, or to facilitate the sale of real estate acquired through foreclosure.

          The following table sets forth the interest rate spread between our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities at the dates indicated.

June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Weighted average yield:

Loans and mortgage-backed securities (a)

6.57

%

7.10

%

7.41

%

7.45

%

7.49

%

Investment securities (b)

4.88

5.01

5.09

5.50

5.45


Interest-earning assets yield

6.44

6.84

7.14

7.15

7.22


Weighted average cost:

Deposits

2.95

3.47

3.92

3.96

3.97

Borrowings:

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

2.40

2.92

-

5.14

5.30

Federal Home Loan Bank advances (c)

3.35

3.49

5.61

5.96

6.28

Senior notes

6.50

6.50

6.50

6.50

6.50


Total borrowings

3.64

3.80

5.74

5.79

6.00


Combined funds cost

3.06

3.52

4.14

4.26

4.26


Interest rate spread

3.38

%

3.32

%

3.00

%

2.89

%

2.96

%


(a) Excludes adjustments for non-accrual loans, amortization of net deferred costs to originate loans, premiums and discounts, prepayment and late fees.
(b) Excludes FHLB stock dividends and includes the yield on investment securities accounted for on a trade-date basis but for which interest income will not be recognized until settlement. Yields for investment securities available for sale are calculated using historical cost balances and are not adjusted for changes in fair value that are reflected as a separate component of stockholders’ equity.
(c) Included the impact of interest rate swap contracts, with notional amounts totaling $430 million of receive-fixed, pay-3-month LIBOR variable interest, which contracts serve as a permitted hedge against a portion of our FHLB advances.

          The period-end weighted average yield on our loans and mortgage-backed securities was 6.57% at June 30, 2008, down from 7.41% at December 31, 2007 and 7.49% a year ago. At June 30, 2008, our adjustable rate mortgage portfolio of single family residential loans, including mortgage-backed securities, totaled $10.8 billion with a weighted average rate of 6.58%, compared with $10.8 billion with a weighted average rate of 7.29% at December 31, 2007, and $11.7 billion with a weighted average rate of 7.47% at June 30, 2007.

Page 51
Navigation Links

Problem Loans and Real Estate

Non-Performing Assets and Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”)

          Non-performing assets consist of loans on which we have ceased accruing interest (which we refer to as non-accrual loans), loans restructured at an interest rate below market and real estate acquired in settlement of loans. At the beginning of the third quarter of 2007, we initiated our borrower retention program to provide borrowers who are current with their loan payments a cost effective means to change from an adjustable rate loan subject to negative amortization to a less costly financing alternative. Those loans are considered TDRs and have been placed on non-accrual status even though the interest rates following modification were no less than those offered new borrowers. The reason for this is because the modified interest rate was lower than the interest rate on the original loan and the loan was not re-underwritten to prove that the new interest rate was, in fact, a market interest rate for a borrower with similar credit quality. Interest income is recorded as these borrowers make their loan payments and, in the current quarter, $11.3 million was recognized including $1.5 million of amortization of associated impairment allowance. If these borrowers perform pursuant to the modified terms for six consecutive months, the loans will be placed back on accrual status and, while still reported as TDRs, they will no longer be classified as non-performing assets because the borrower will have demonstrated an ability to perform in accordance with the loan modification and the interest rate was no less than those afforded new borrowers at the time of modification. Through June 30, 2008, $347 million met the performance threshold and were removed from non-performing status.

          Our non-performing assets totaled $1.958 billion at June 30, 2008, up from $1.042 billion at December 31, 2007 and $227 million at June 30, 2007. Virtually all of the $395 million increase in non-performing assets during the current quarter came from our single family residential loans which, in turn, reflected the following:

These increases were partially offset by performing TDR loans modified as part of our previously disclosed borrower retention program which had a net decline of $41 million. At June 30, 2008, $355 million of TDR loans for which we have received six consecutive months of successful loan payments were removed from non-performing assets and placed on accrual status, of which $347 million were associated with our borrower retention program and $8 million were associated with loans modified in loan workout situations.

          Our non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets were 15.50 % at June 30, 2008, up from 7.77% at year-end 2007 and 1.53% at June 30, 2007. To the extent borrowers whose loans were modified pursuant to the borrower retention program are current with their loan payments and included in non-performing assets, it is relevant to distinguish those from total non-performing assets because, these loans are paying interest at interest rates no less than those offered new borrowers. At June 30, 2008, $548 million or 82% of such borrowers had made all loan payments due. Accordingly, the 15.5% ratio of non-performing assets to total assets includes 4.34% related to performing TDRs, resulting in an adjusted ratio of 11.16%.

Page 52
Navigation Links

          The following table summarizes our non-performing assets at the dates indicated.

June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(Dollars in Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Non-accrual loans:

Residential one-to-four units:

Performing troubled debt restructurings (a)

$

548,096

$

589,304

$

400,562

$

-

$

-

Other troubled debt restructurings

240,220

110,368

31,218

-

-

All other

894,659

658,334

448,516

255,839

178,504

Construction

12,790

14,869

15,933

7,808

7,067

Land

-

-

29,080

-

11,345

Other

566

487

837

511

525


Total non-accrual loans

1,696,331

1,373,362

926,146

264,158

197,441

Real estate acquired in settlement of loans (b)

261,536

189,127

115,623

59,773

29,925


Total non-performing assets

$

1,957,867

$

1,562,489

$

1,041,769

$

323,931

$

227,366


Allowance for loan losses:

Amount

$

732,354

$

546,751

$

348,167

$

142,218

$

69,107

As a percentage of non-accrual loans

43.17

%

39.81

%

37.59

%

53.84

%

35.00

%

Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets:

Performing troubled debt restructurings (a)

4.34

4.49

2.99

0.67

-

All other non-performing assets

11.16

7.41

4.78

2.27

1.53


Total non-performing assets

15.50

%

11.90

%

7.77

%

2.94

%

1.53

%


Performing troubled debt restructurings excluded

from non-performing assets (c)

$

354,842

$

49,141

$

-

$

-

$

-


(a) Represents TDRs associated with loans modified pursuant to our borrower retention program and all payments due have been made. These loans are considered TDRs and have been placed on non-accrual status even though the interest rate following modification was no less than that offered new borrowers at the time of loan modification. These TDR loans will be on non-accrual status until six consecutive months of successful payment history has been established, at which time they will be removed from non-accrual status and from non-performing assets; however, they will continue to be reported as TDRs. While these loans are on non-accrual status, interest income is recognized only when paid by borrowers on a cash basis.
(b) Amount is net of a valuation allowance of $18 million at June 30, 2008 and $12 million at March 31, 2008, which reflects recent loss experience from sales compared to their fair value prior to sale.
(c)
Represents loans where the borrower has made six consecutive months of successful loan payments and the loan has been placed on accrual status, including $347 million associated with our borrower retention program and $8 million related to loans modified in loan workout situations.

          We evaluate the need for property valuations of non-performing assets on a periodic basis. We generally will obtain a new property valuation when we believe there may have been an adverse change in the property operations or in the economic conditions of the geographic market of the property securing our loans. Our policy is to obtain new property valuations at least annually for all real estate acquired in settlement of loans, but in a declining real estate market such as the recent market, we typically obtain new property valuations more frequently.

Page 53
Navigation Links

          At June 30, 2008, 90% of our non-performing assets were located in California, compared with 85% a year ago. The following table summarizes by major geographical area our residential one-to-four unit non-performing assets at the dates indicated.

June 30, 2008

June 30, 2007


Non-

Non-

% of

Non-

Non-

% of

Performing

Performing

Related

Performing

Performing

Related

(Dollars in Thousands)

Loans

REO

Assets

Assets

Loans

REO

Assets

Assets


Loan Investment Portfolio

Residential one-to-four units:

California county:

Los Angeles

$

200,816

$

21,862

$

222,678

10.8

%

$

18,757

$

938

$

19,695

0.9

%

San Diego

263,581

40,622

304,203

24.6

24,835

5,087

29,922

2.2

Santa Clara

87,065

9,960

97,025

9.4

7,543

1,801

9,344

1.0

Orange

115,429

13,562

128,991

14.4

9,164

247

9,411

1.0

Alameda

76,530

14,320

90,850

16.8

8,053

772

8,825

1.5

Riverside

100,476

20,557

121,033

24.6

13,276

2,107

15,383

2.6

Contra Costa

89,292

16,365

105,657

22.9

6,131

1,154

7,285

1.4

San Mateo

38,669

2,057

40,726

12.4

4,358

-

4,358

1.4

San Bernardino

56,401

9,517

65,918

20.4

5,964

220

6,184

1.7

Sacramento

81,727

19,272

100,999

34.2

11,749

3,267

15,016

4.3

All other counties

402,724

65,779

468,503

22.2

42,322

8,608

50,930

2.2


Total California

1,512,710

233,873

1,746,583

17.9

152,152

24,201

176,353

1.7

Arizona

62,352

9,912

72,264

16.3

6,207

595

6,802

1.4

All other states

107,913

10,085

117,998

17.7

20,145

5,087

25,232

3.0

Valuation allowance

-

(17,592

)

(17,592

)

(1.6

)

-

-

-

-


Total residential

one-to-four units

$

1,682,975

$

236,278

$

1,919,253

17.0

%

$

178,504

$

29,883

$

208,387

1.8

%


Troubled Debt Restructurings

          We consider a restructuring of a debt a TDR when we, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties, grant a concession to the borrower that we would not otherwise grant. TDRs may include changing repayment terms, reducing the stated interest rate, reducing the amounts of principal and/or interest due or extending the maturity date. The restructuring of a loan is intended to recover as much of our investment as possible and to achieve the highest yield possible. During the current quarter, the total interest recognized on the impaired portfolio was $19.9 million. At June 30, 2008, we had $1.156 billion of TDRs of which $1.012 billion related to the borrower retention program, $131 million related to other residential one-to-four unit loans and $13 million related to two construction loans. Of those TDRs related to our borrower retention program, $347 million have demonstrated six consecutive months of successful payment history, were accruing interest and were no longer reported as a non-performing asset at June 30, 2008. During the current quarter, we recorded $11.3 million of interest income from loan payments made by borrowers whose loans were modified as part of our borrower retention program and are still included in non-performing assets. There are $8 million TDR loans modified in loan workout situations that are currently accruing interest.

Real Estate Acquired in Settlement of Loans

          Real estate acquired in settlement of loans consists of real estate acquired through foreclosure or deeds in lieu of foreclosure and totaled $262 million at June 30, 2008. Of this amount, $236 million, net of a $18 million valuation allowance which reflects recent loss experience from sales compared to their fair value prior to sale, was for 888 residential one-to-four unit properties, $18 million represented one property consisting of raw land for approximately 545 single family lots and $8 million represented one property consisting of 113 single family lots. We generally require private mortgage insurance on loans in excess of 80% of their appraised value. In the current quarter, subsequent to our acquiring real estate in the settlement of loans, we collected $3.3 million in private mortgage insurance to mitigate any losses incurred.

Page 54
Navigation Links

          The following table summarizes the activity of our number of residential one-to-four unit properties acquired in settlement of loans and the loss given default on those sold for the quarters indicated.

June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(Dollars in Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Number of residential one-to-four unit

properties acquired in settlement of loans

Count at beginning of period

575

326

162

90

53

New

522

316

212

109

50

Sold

(209

)

(67

)

(48

)

(37

)

(13

)


Count at end of period

888

575

326

162

90


Loss given default (a)

31.8

%

22.3

%

22.2

%

8.1

%

6.8

%


(a) Reflects the difference between the net sales proceeds and loan principal balance at foreclosure adjusted for associated deferred costs and fees, premiums and discounts, and collection of mortgage insurance as a percentage of their loan principal balance at foreclosure. The ratio does not include the cost to carry or real estate related costs, such as property taxes, which are expensed as incurred.

          At June 30, 2008, 87 properties or 9.7% of our one-to-four unit residential properties were in escrow to be sold and offers were being negotiated on an additional 84 properties.

Delinquent Loans

          At June 30, 2008, loans delinquent 30 days or more as a percentage of total loans was 11.21%, up from 6.05% at December 31, 2007 and 2.11% at June 30, 2007. The increase from the year-ago quarter occurred primarily in our residential one-to-four unit loan classification. As a percentage of its loan category, delinquent residential one-to-four units increased from 2.08% at June 30, 2007 to 11.61% at June 30, 2008, reflecting the continued weakness in the residential real estate market. A higher incidence of delinquency is expected when the minimum payments reset on our adjustable rate loans subject to negative amortization or interest only payments, whereby the interest rate is fixed for the first three to five years. For example, we had loans subject to negative amortization or with interest only payments that have not been modified within our loans held for investment, which recasted for the first time in 2007 or 2008 of $1.5 billion, of which 39.9% were delinquent 30 days or more at June 30, 2008. The increase in delinquency is considered when we analyze the adequacy of our credit loss allowance.

Page 55
Navigation Links

          The following table indicates the amounts of our past due loans at the dates indicated.

June 30, 2008

March 31, 2008


30-59

60-89

90+

30-59

60-89

90+

(Dollars in Thousands)

Days

Days

Days (a)

Total

Days

Days

Days (a)

Total


Loans secured by real estate:

Residential:

One-to-four units

$

269,429

$

209,610

$

796,358

$

1,275,397

$

226,100

$

160,775

$

576,130

$

963,005

Home equity loans and lines of credit

212

-

490

702

131

-

422

553

Five or more units

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Commercial real estate

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Construction

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Land

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-


Total real estate loans

269,641

209,610

796,848

1,276,099

226,231

160,775

576,552

963,558

Non-mortgage:

Commercial

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Consumer

17

5

76

98

19

9

65

93


Total delinquent loans

$

269,658

$

209,615

$

796,924

$

1,276,197

$

226,250

$

160,784

$

576,617

$

963,651


Delinquencies as a percentage

of total loans

2.37

%

1.84

%

7.00

%

11.21

%

2.02

%

1.44

%

5.16

%

8.62

%


December 31, 2007

September 30, 2007


Loans secured by real estate:

Residential:

One-to-four units

$

205,737

$

134,715

$

313,528

$

653,980

$

129,329

$

75,757

$

180,422

$

385,508

Home equity loans and lines of credit

-

450

776

1,226

212

195

444

851

Five or more units

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Commercial real estate

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Construction

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Land

33,580

-

-

33,580

-

-

-

-


Total real estate loans

239,317

135,165

314,304

688,786

129,541

75,952

180,866

386,359

Non-mortgage:

Commercial

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Consumer

21

12

61

94

22

6

67

95


Total delinquent loans

$

239,338

$

135,177

$

314,365

$

688,880

$

129,563

$

75,958

$

180,933

$

386,454


Delinquencies as a percentage

of total loans

2.10

%

1.19

%

2.76

%

6.05

%

1.11

%

0.65

%

1.54

%

3.30

%


June 30, 2007


Loans secured by real estate:

Residential:

One-to-four units

$

77,332

$

57,065

$

113,413

$

247,810

Home equity loans and lines of credit

177

-

463

640

Five or more units

-

-

-

-

Commercial real estate

-

-

-

-

Construction

-

-

-

-

Land

-

-

11,345

11,345


Total real estate loans

77,509

57,065

125,221

259,795

Non-mortgage:

Commercial

-

-

-

-

Consumer

18

11

62

91


Total delinquent loans

$

77,527

$

57,076

$

125,283

$

259,886


Delinquencies as a percentage

of total loans

0.63

%

0.46

%

1.02

%

2.11

%


(a) All 90 day or greater delinquencies are on non-accrual status and reported as part of non-performing assets.
Page 56
Navigation Links

Allowance for Credit and Real Estate Losses

          We maintain a valuation allowance for credit and real estate losses to provide for losses inherent in those portfolios at the balance sheet date. The allowance for credit losses includes an allowance for loan losses reported as a reduction of loans held for investment and the allowance for loan-related commitments reported in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance quarterly to maintain the allowance at levels sufficient to provide for inherent losses at the balance sheet date.

          We use an internal asset review system and loss allowance methodology designed to provide for timely recognition of problem assets and an adequate allowance to cover asset and loan-related commitment losses. The amount of the allowance is based upon the total of general valuation allowances, allocated allowances and specific allowances. General valuation allowances relate to assets and loan-related commitments with no well-defined deficiency or weakness and take into consideration losses that are imbedded within the portfolio but have not yet been realized. Allocated allowances relate to assets segregated into different classifications with well-defined deficiencies or weaknesses. Loans evaluated individually that are deemed to be impaired are separated from our other credit loss analysis in accordance with FASB Statement No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. If we determine the carrying value of our asset exceeds the net fair value and no alternative payment source exists, then a specific allowance is recorded for the amount of that difference.

          The OTS has the authority to require us to change our asset classifications. If the change results in an asset being classified in whole or in part as loss, a specific allowance must be established against the amount so classified or that amount must be charged off. The OTS generally directs its examiners to rely on management’s estimates of adequate general valuation allowances if the Bank’s process for determining adequate allowances is deemed to be sound.

          Provision for credit losses totaled $258.9 million in the second quarter of 2008, compared with $9.5 million a year ago. Our current quarter provision for credit losses less net loan charge-offs and the TDR yield adjustment resulted in an increase of $186.0 million in our allowance for credit losses reflecting an increase of $110.1 million in the general valuation allowance and an increase of $75.9 million in the allocated allowance. The increase in the allowance was primarily related to our one-to-four unit residential portfolio due to the unfavorable impact to our borrowers from the continued weakening and uncertainty of the residential housing market and increased delinquency due, in part, to payment recasts and high debt burdens where borrowers obtained additional financing subsequent to the funding of our loan.

          At June 30, 2008, the allowance for credit losses was $734 million, comprised of $732 million for loan losses and $2 million for loan-related commitments. That compares to an allowance for credit losses of $349 million at year-end 2007, comprised of $348 million for loan losses and $1 million for loan-related commitments. Loan-related commitments are reported on the balance sheet in the category accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The allowance for credit losses increased $186 million this quarter, of which $30 million was related to specific allowances associated with certain troubled debt restructurings pursuant to our borrower retention program. These specific allowances totaled $93 million at quarter end and will be accreted into interest income over the remaining life of the modified loans as long as they remain on accrual status. The balance of the increase in the allowance for credit losses primarily reflects further declines in the value of underlying home collateral as well as further increases in delinquent loans.

          Downey’s allowance methodology incorporates assumptions related to default probabilities, loss severities and loss horizons based on historical experience, current market conditions, and the unique characteristics of each borrower, loan and underlying collateral. On a comparative basis, these factors individually increase or decrease the amount of the allowance for loan losses from prior periods. Both default probabilities and loss severities increased in the current quarter as a result of the challenging market conditions continuing to affect the residential housing market. In particular, collateral values have been trending downward in the greater Sacramento, Stockton, Modesto and Contra Costa areas of Northern California, the Inland Empire area of Southern California and San Diego County. Also, the horizon over which borrower defaults are projected to occur has shortened. The shorter default horizon reflects our recent experience of losses emerging earlier in the current environment compared with prior periods as the loan portfolio has continued to age, real estate values have continued to decline and borrowers have continued to experience reduced levels of equity in their homes. Net loan charge-offs totaled $70.2 million in the current quarter, compared with $1.0 million a year ago.

Page 57
Navigation Links

          The following table summarizes the activity in our allowance for losses on loans and loan-related commitments for the quarters indicated.

Three Months Ended


June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(In Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Allowance for loan losses

Balance at beginning of period

$

546,751

$

348,167

$

142,218

$

69,107

$

60,758

Provision

258,517

237,087

218,650

81,435

9,379

TDR yield adjustment (a)

(2,670

)

(1,461

)

(483

)

-

-

Charge-offs

(70,245

)

(37,043

)

(12,220

)

(8,368

)

(1,133

)

Recoveries

1

1

2

44

103


Balance at end of period

$

732,354

$

546,751

$

348,167

$

142,218

$

69,107


Allowance for loan-related commitments

Balance at beginning of period

$

998

$

1,215

$

1,418

$

1,291

$

1,165

Provision (reduction)

357

(217

)

(203

)

127

126


Balance at end of period

$

1,355

$

998

$

1,215

$

1,418

$

1,291


Total allowance for credit losses

Balance at beginning of period

$

547,749

$

349,382

$

143,636

$

70,398

$

61,923

Provision

258,874

236,870

218,447

81,562

9,505

TDR yield adjustment (a)

(2,670

)

(1,461

)

(483

)

-

-

Charge-offs

(70,245

)

(37,043

)

(12,220

)

(8,368

)

(1,133

)

Recoveries

1

1

2

44

103


Balance at end of period

$

733,709

$

547,749

$

349,382

$

143,636

$

70,398


(a) For TDRs of residential one-to-four unit loans, a specific valuation allowance is calculated as the difference between the recorded investment of the original loan and the present value of the expected cash flows of the modified loan (discounted at the effective interest rate of the original loan based on an expected life). This difference is recorded as a provision for credit losses in current earnings and subsequently amortized over the expected life of the loans as an adjustment to loan yield or as a reduction of the provision if the loan is prepaid.

          The following table summarizes the activity in our allowance for losses on loans and loan-related commitments for the year-to-date periods indicated.

Six Months Ended June 30,


(In Thousands)

2008

2007


Allowance for loan losses

Balance at beginning of period

$

348,167

$

60,943

Provision

495,604

9,886

TDR yield adjustment (a)

(4,131

)

-

Charge-offs

(107,288

)

(1,976

)

Recoveries

2

254


Balance at end of period

$

732,354

$

69,107


Allowance for loan-related commitments

Balance at beginning of period

$

1,215

$

1,055

Provision

140

236


Balance at end of period

$

1,355

$

1,291


Total allowance for credit losses

Balance at beginning of period

$

349,382

$

61,998

Provision

495,744

10,122

TDR yield adjustment (a)

(4,131

)

-

Charge-offs

(107,288

)

(1,976

)

Recoveries

2

254


Balance at end of period

$

733,709

$

70,398


(a) For TDRs of residential one-to-four unit loans, a specific valuation allowance is calculated as the difference between the recorded investment of the original loan and the present value of the expected cash flows of the modified loan (discounted at the effective interest rate of the original loan based on an expected life). This difference is recorded as a provision for credit losses in current earnings and subsequently amortized over the expected life of the loans as an adjustment to loan yield or as a reduction of the provision if the loan is prepaid.
Page 58
Navigation Links

          Net charge-offs of loans totaled $70.2 million in the current quarter, compared to $1.0 million a year ago. The current quarter net charge-offs primarily related to residential one-to-four unit loans, with an annualized net charge-off ratio associated with these loans increasing to 2.60% from 0.03% a year ago.

          For the first six months of 2008, the provision for credit losses totaled $495.7 million and net charge-offs were $107.3 million. This compares with a $10.1 million provision for credit losses and net charge-offs of $1.7 million a year ago.

          The following table presents gross charge-offs, gross recoveries and net charge-offs by category of loan for the periods indicated.

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended


June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

June 30,

(Dollars in Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007

2008

2007


Gross loan charge-offs

Loans secured by real estate:

Residential:

One-to-four units

$

70,219

$

26,207

$

12,188

$

4,301

$

1,097

$

96,426

$

1,920

Home equity loans and lines

of credit

-

169

-

-

-

169

-

Five or more units

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Commercial real estate

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Construction

-

-

(3

)

-

20

-

20

Land

-

10,639

-

4,022

-

10,639

-

Non-mortgage:

Commercial

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Consumer

26

28

35

45

16

54

36


Total gross loan charge-offs

70,245

37,043

12,220

8,368

1,133

107,288

1,976


Gross loan recoveries

Loans secured by real estate:

Residential:

One-to-four units

-

-

-

40

101

-

251

Home equity loans and lines

of credit

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Five or more units

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Commercial real estate

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Construction

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Land

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Non-mortgage:

Commercial

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Consumer

1

1

2

4

2

2

3


Total gross loan recoveries

1

1

2

44

103

2

254


Net loan charge-offs (recoveries)

Loans secured by real estate:

Residential:

One-to-four units

70,219

26,207

12,188

4,261

996

96,426

1,669

Home equity loans and lines

169

of credit

-

-

-

-

-

169

-

Five or more units

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Commercial real estate

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Construction

-

-

(3

)

-

20

-

20

Land

-

10,639

-

4,022

-

10,639

-

Non-mortgage:

Commercial

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Consumer

25

27

33

41

14

52

33


Total net loan charge-offs

$

70,244

$

37,042

$

12,218

$

8,324

$

1,030

$

107,286

$

1,722


Net loan charge-offs

as a percentage of average loans

2.60

%

1.35

%

0.43

%

0.28

%

0.03

%

1.97

%

0.03

%


Page 59
Navigation Links

          The following table indicates our allocation of the allowance for loan losses to the various categories of loans at the dates indicated.

June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(Dollars in Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Loans secured by real estate:

Residential:

One-to-four units

$

727,073

$

542,248

$

339,424

$

134,947

$

64,700

Home equity loans and lines of credit

828

767

1,019

850

843

Five or more units

1,306

1,005

976

965

992

Commercial real estate

226

247

297

298

301

Construction

2,348

1,916

1,857

1,726

860

Land

198

195

4,229

3,081

1,098

Non-mortgage:

Commercial

40

39

36

12

11

Consumer

335

334

329

339

302


Total for loans held for investment

$

732,354

$

546,751

$

348,167

$

142,218

$

69,107


          The following table indicates our allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loan category balance for the various categories of loans at the dates indicated.

June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(Dollars in Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Loans secured by real estate:

Residential:

One-to-four units

6.67

%

5.06

%

3.12

%

1.20

%

0.55

%

Home equity loans and lines of credit

0.63

0.58

0.74

0.59

0.54

Five or more units

1.08

1.00

0.97

0.92

0.92

Commercial real estate

1.00

1.00

1.12

1.12

1.12

Construction

2.22

2.56

2.29

2.96

1.63

Land

1.88

1.88

8.54

6.06

1.71

Non-mortgage:

Commercial

0.73

0.74

0.72

0.24

0.41

Consumer

5.75

5.63

5.49

5.60

4.76


Total for loans held for investment

6.48

%

4.94

%

3.09

%

1.22

%

0.57

%


          The following table indicates by loan category the percentage mix of our total loans held for investment at the dates indicated.

June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(Dollars in Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Loans secured by real estate:

Residential:

One-to-four units

96.43

%

96.80

%

96.40

%

96.60

%

96.57

%

Home equity loans and lines of credit

1.16

1.20

1.23

1.24

1.28

Five or more units

1.08

0.91

0.89

0.90

0.89

Commercial real estate

0.20

0.22

0.23

0.23

0.22

Construction

0.94

0.68

0.72

0.50

0.44

Land

0.09

0.09

0.44

0.44

0.53

Non-mortgage:

Commercial

0.05

0.05

0.04

0.04

0.02

Consumer

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.05


Total for loans held for investment

100.00

%

100.00

%

100.00

%

100.00

%

100.00

%


Page 60
Navigation Links

          In determining impairment, we consider large non-homogeneous loans that are on non-accrual, have been restructured or are performing but exhibit, among other characteristics, high loan-to-value ratios or delinquent taxes. We base the measurement of collateral dependent impaired loans on the net fair value of the loan’s collateral. We value non-collateral dependent loans based on a present value calculation of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective rate or the loan’s observable market price. We generally use cash receipts on impaired loans not performing according to contractual terms to reduce the carrying value of the loan, unless we believe we will recover the remaining principal balance of the loan, in which case we may recognize interest income. We include impairment losses in the allowance for loan losses through a charge to provision for credit losses. We include adjustments to impairment losses due to changes in the fair value of the collateral of impaired loans in provision for credit losses. For TDRs of residential one-to-four unit loans, we include adjustments to impairment losses due to the change in cash flow as an adjustment to loan yield. Upon disposition of an impaired loan, we record loss of principal through a charge-off to the allowance for loan losses.

          At June 30, 2008, the recorded investment in loans for which we recognized impairment totaled $1.178 billion, up from $486 million at December 31, 2007 and $19 million at June 30, 2007. Of the current quarter total, $1.143 billion related to residential one-to-four unit loan TDRs with an allowance for loss of $100 million and $13 million related to two construction loans with an allowance for loss of $2 million. This is up from 2007 year-end totals of $441 million related to residential one-to-four unit loan TDRs with an allowance for loss of $39 million, $29 million related to one land loan with an allowance for loss of $4 million, $15 million related to two construction loans with an allowance for loss of $2 million, and $1 million related to one residential one-to-four unit loan with no allowance for loss; and up from the year-ago quarter total of $19 million with an allowance of less than $1 million. During the current quarter, the total interest recognized on the impaired portfolio was $19.9 million, compared to $10.5 million in the first quarter of 2008 and no interest recognized in the year-ago quarter.

          The following table summarizes the activity in our allowance for credit losses associated with impaired loans for the quarters indicated.

Three Months Ended


June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(In Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Balance at beginning of period

$

66,801

$

45,066

$

721

$

1,238

$

657

Provision (reduction)

38,052

33,900

48,602

(412

)

581

TDR yield adjustment (a)

(2,670

)

(1,461

)

(483

)

-

-

Charge-offs

(170

)

(10,7044

)

(3,917

)

(105

)

-

Recoveries

-

-

143

-

-


Balance at end of period

$

102,013

$

66,801

$

45,066

$

721

$

1,238


(a) For TDRs of residential one-to-four unit loans, a specific valuation allowance is calculated as the difference between the recorded investment of the original loan and the present value of the expected cash flows of the modified loan (discounted at the effective interest rate of the original loan based on an expected life). This difference is recorded as a provision for credit losses in current earnings and subsequently amortized over the expected life of the loans as an adjustment to loan yield or as a reduction of the provision if the loan is prepaid.

          The following table summarizes the activity in our allowance for credit losses associated with impaired loans for the year-to-date periods indicated.

Six Months Ended June 30,


(In Thousands)

2008

2007


Balance at beginning of period

$

45,066

$

601

Provision

71,952

1,184

TDR yield adjustment (a)

(4,131

)

-

Charge-offs

(10,874

)

(547

)

Recoveries

-

-


Balance at end of period

$

102,013

$

1,238


(a) For TDRs of residential one-to-four unit loans, a specific valuation allowance is calculated as the difference between the recorded investment of the original loan and the present value of the expected cash flows of the modified loan (discounted at the effective interest rate of the original loan based on an expected life). This difference is recorded as a provision for credit losses in current earnings and subsequently amortized over the expected life of the loans as an adjustment to loan yield or as a reduction of the provision if the loan is prepaid.
Page 61
Navigation Links

          The following table summarizes the activity in our allowance for real estate and joint ventures held for investment for the quarters indicated.

Three Months Ended


June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(In Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Balance at beginning of period

$

413

$

422

$

432

$

456

$

103

Provision (reduction)

11,454

(9

)

(10

)

(24

)

353

Charge-offs

-

-

-

-

-

Recoveries

-

-

-

-

-


Balance at end of period

$

11,867

$

413

$

422

$

432

$

456


 

          The following table summarizes the activity in our allowance for real estate and joint ventures held for investment for the year-to-date periods indicated.

Six Months Ended June 30,


(In Thousands)

2008

2007


Balance at beginning of period

$

422

$

103

Provision

11,445

353

Charge-offs

-

-

Recoveries

-

-


Balance at end of period

$

11,867

$

456


          The following table summarizes the activity in our allowance for real estate acquired in settlement of loans for the quarters indicated.

Three Months Ended


June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(In Thousands)

2008

2008

2007

2007

2007


Balance at beginning of period

$

12,334

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

Provision

14,712

19,892

1,118

2,058

444

Charge-offs

(9,454

)

(7,558

)

(1,118

)

(2,058

)

(444

)

Recoveries

-

-

-

-

-


Balance at end of period

$

17,592

$

12,334

$

-

$

-

$

-


          The following table summarizes the activity in our allowance for real estate acquired in settlement of loans for the year-to-date periods indicated.

Six Months Ended June 30,


(In Thousands)

2008

2007


Balance at beginning of period

$

-

$

-

Provision

34,604

563

Charge-offs

(17,012

)

(563

)

Recoveries

-

-


Balance at end of period

$

17,592

$

-


          We value real estate acquired through foreclosure at fair value less cost to sell, with any subsequent losses recorded as a direct write-off to net operations. Given the decline in home values in the residential market, we established a valuation allowance at quarter end of $18 million for our one-to-four unit residential properties acquired through foreclosure. This valuation allowance reflects recent loss experience from sales compared to their fair value prior to sale. As that loss experience changes over time, our estimate of this valuation allowance will be reassessed.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

          Our sources of funds include deposits, advances from the FHLB and other borrowings; proceeds from the sale of loans, available for sale securities, and real estate; payments of loans and payments for and sales of loan servicing; and income from other investments. Interest rates, real estate sales activity and general economic conditions significantly affect repayments on loans and deposit inflows and outflows.

Page 62
Navigation Links

          Our primary sources of funds generated in the second quarter of 2008 were from:

          We used these funds to:

          In addition to its deposits, Downey’s principal source of liquidity is its ability to utilize borrowings, as needed. The Bank’s primary source of borrowings is the FHLB. At June 30, 2008, the Bank’s FHLB borrowings totaled $1.5 billion, representing 12.1% of total assets. As of August 8, 2008, the Bank’s FHLB borrowings totaled $2.8 billion. Approximately half of the Bank’s increase in FHLB borrowings subsequent to June 30, 2008 is being held in cash equivalents and short-term investment securities to meet our liquidity needs. The Bank currently is approved by the FHLB to borrow up to a maximum of $3.0 billion to the extent it provides qualifying collateral, providing the Bank with an additional $0.2 billion of borrowing capacity from the FHLB as of August 8. The amount the FHLB is willing to advance differs based on the quality and character of qualifying collateral offered by the Bank, and the advance rates for the same collateral may be adjusted upwards or downwards by the FHLB from time to time. The Bank also is approved to borrow funds on an overnight basis from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco subject to the amount of qualifying collateral it pledges. The Bank views the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco as a back-up source of liquidity. As of August 8, 2008, the Bank had no outstanding borrowings from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and the Bank’s available qualifying collateral would have permitted it to borrow up to an additional $1.5 billion. Neither the FHLB nor the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco is obligated to lend to us under these loan facilities. To the extent deposit renewals and deposit growth are not sufficient to fund maturing and withdrawable deposits, repay maturing borrowings, fund existing and future loans and investment securities and otherwise fund working capital needs and capital expenditures, the Bank may utilize additional borrowing capacity from its FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank borrowing arrangements.

          As of June 30, 2008, we had commitments to borrowers for short-term interest rate locks, before the reduction of expected fallout, of $460 million, of which $78 million were related to residential one-to-four unit loans being originated for sale in the secondary market. We also had undisbursed loan funds and unused lines of credit of $278 million, loan forward purchase contracts of $4 million and operating leases of $16 million.

          After the end of the second quarter, the Bank experienced elevated levels of deposit withdrawals. More recently, in response to steps taken by management to address the situation, the Bank has experienced net deposit inflows. If the Bank’s deposit levels continue to stabilize with withdrawals at historical levels, Downey believes its current sources of funds, including deposits; advances from the FHLB and other borrowings; proceeds from the sale of loans and real estate; payments of loans and payments for and sales of loan servicing; and income from other investments would enable Downey to meet its obligations while maintaining liquidity at appropriate levels. However, if elevated levels of net deposit outflows resume, the Bank’s usual sources of liquidity could become depleted, and the Bank would be required to raise additional capital or enter into new financing arrangements to satisfy its liquidity needs. In the current economic environment, there are no assurances that we would be able to raise additional capital or enter into additional financing arrangements.

          Management believes that the Holding Company, on a stand-alone basis, currently has adequate liquid assets to meet its current obligations, which are primarily interest payments on $199 million of senior notes. Limitations imposed by the OTS currently prohibit the Bank from providing a dividend to the Holding Company without prior OTS approval, and currently prohibit the Holding Company from paying a dividend (other than the quarterly dividend payable in August 2008) without prior non-objection of the OTS. At June 30, 2008, the Holding Company’s liquid assets, including amounts deposited with the Bank, totaled $53 million, down from $102 million at the end of 2007 due primarily to a $50 million capital contribution to the Bank.

          Downey’s stockholders’ equity totaled $0.9 billion at June 30, 2008, down from $1.3 billion at December 31, 2007 and $1.5 billion at June 30, 2007. The Board reduced the quarterly per share dividend payment from $0.12 to $0.01 for the dividend payable in August 2008, after which no future dividends will be paid without prior non-objection of the OTS.

Page 63
Navigation Links

          On July 25, 2008, following Downey’s second quarter earnings release on July 24, 2008, Moody’s Investors Service downgraded the Holding Company’s senior unsecured debt rating to “B1” from “Ba1.” In addition, the Bank’s financial strength was downgraded to “D” from the previous rating of a “D+,” long-term deposit rating to “Ba2” from “Baa3” and short-term deposits to “Not Prime” from “Prime-3,” with the ratings of both the Holding Company and the Bank under review for downgrade. On July 26, 2008, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services lowered its senior unsecured and counterparty credit rating on the Holding Company to “BB+/B” from “BBB-/A-3.” In addition, the Bank’s counterparty and deposit ratings were lowered to “BBB-/A-3” from “BBB/A-2,” with the ratings of both the Holding Company and the Bank on negative watch. These lower ratings, and any further ratings downgrades, could make it more difficult for the Holding Company and the Bank to access the capital markets going forward, as the cost to borrow or raise capital would most likely become more expensive.The cost of the Bank’s primary funding sources (deposits and FHLB borrowings) is not influenced directly by the Bank’s credit ratings.

          In addition, the Holding Company may not issue new debt or renew existing debt without prior non-objection of the OTS.

Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments

          Through the normal course of operations, we have entered into contractual obligations and other commitments. Our obligations generally relate to funding of our operations through deposits and borrowings as well as leases for premises and equipment, and our commitments generally relate to our lending operations.

          We have obligations under long-term operating leases, principally for building space and land. Lease terms generally cover a five-year period, with options to extend, and are non-cancelable. Currently, we have no material contractual vendor obligations.

          We have executed interest rate swap contracts to change interest rate characteristics of a portion of our FHLB advances to better manage interest rate risk. The contracts have notional amounts totaling $430 million of receive-fixed, pay 3-month LIBOR variable interest and serve as a permitted fair value hedge.

          Our commitments to originate fixed and variable rate mortgage loans are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the commitment. Undisbursed loan funds on construction projects and unused lines of credit on home equity and commercial loans include committed funds not disbursed. Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by us to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.

          Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since some commitments expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The credit risk involved in issuing lines and letters of credit requires the same creditworthiness evaluation as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. We evaluate each customer’s creditworthiness.

          We receive collateral to support commitments when deemed necessary. The most significant categories of collateral include real estate properties underlying mortgage loans, liens on personal property and cash on deposit with us.

          We enter into derivative financial instruments as part of our interest rate risk management process, including loan forward sale and purchase contracts related to our sale of loans in the secondary market. The associated fair value changes to the notional amount of the derivative instruments are recorded on-balance sheet. The total notional amount of our derivative financial instruments does not represent future cash requirements. At June 30, 2008, Downey had a notional amount of interest rate lock commitments identified to sell as part of its secondary marketing activities of $54 million, with a change in fair value resulting in a gain of $0.7 million, compared with a notional amount of interest rate lock commitments of $123 million with a change in fair value resulting in a loss of $0.3 million at June 30, 2007. For further information, see Asset/Liability Management and Market Risk on page 48 and Note 3 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 10.

          We sell all loans without recourse. When a loan sold to an investor without recourse fails to perform according to the contractual terms, the investor will typically review the loan file to determine whether defects in the origination process occurred and whether such defects give rise to a violation of a representation or warranty we made to the investor in connection with the sale. If such a defect is identified, we may be required to either repurchase the loan or indemnify the investor for losses sustained. If there are no such defects, we have no commitment to repurchase the loan. During the first six months of 2008, we repurchased $2 million of loans and $1 million of real estate acquired in settlement of loans and recorded $0.2 million of repurchase or indemnification losses related to defects in the origination process.

          These loan and servicing sale contracts may also contain provisions to refund sale price premiums to the purchaser if the related loans prepay during a period typically 90 days, but not to exceed 120 days from the sale’s settlement date. We

Page 64
Navigation Links

reserved less than $1 million at June 30, 2008, December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2007 to cover the estimated loss exposure related to early payoffs. However, if all the loans related to those sales prepaid within the refund period, as of June 30, 2008, our maximum sales price premium refund would be $1.4 million. See Note 3 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 10.

          At June 30, 2008, scheduled maturities of obligations and commitments, excluding accrued interest, were as follows:

After 1

After 3

Within

Through 3

Through 5

Beyond

Total

(In Thousands)

1 Year

Years

Years

5 Years

Balance


Certificates of deposit

$

7,280,647

$

213,906

$

90,243

$

-

$

7,584,796

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

97,838

-

-

-

97,838

FHLB advances

1,200,034

200,000

125,000

-

1,525,034

Senior notes

-

-

-

198,543

198,543

Secondary marketing activities:

Non-qualifying hedge transactions:

Interest rate lock commitments (a)

54,095

-

-

-

54,095

Associated loan forward sale contracts (a)

57,837

-

-

-

57,837

Associated loan forward purchase contracts

4,000

4,000

Qualifying cash flow hedge transactions:

Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value

85,558

-

-

-

85,558

Associated loan forward sale contracts (a)

72,163

-

-

-

72,163

Qualifying fair value hedge transactions:

Designated FHLB advances – pay-fixed

430,000

-

-

-

430,000

Associated interest rate swap contracts –

pay-variable, receive-fixed (a)

430,000

-

-

-

430,000

Commitments to originate adjustable rate loans held

for investment

362,317

-

-

-

362,317

Undisbursed loan funds and unused lines of credit

25,578

50,935

17,575

183,669

277,757

Operating leases

5,531

7,778

2,702

437

16,448


(a) Amount represents the notional amount of the commitments or contracts. The notional amount for interest rate lock commitments before the reduction of expected fallout was $78 million.

Regulatory Capital Compliance

          The Bank’s core and tangible capital ratios were both 7.57% and its total risk-based capital ratio was 14.31% at June 30, 2008. The Bank’s regulatory capital position was enhanced by $62 million during the current quarter from a contribution of $50 million of equity from the Holding Company and a $12 million dividend paid by DSL Service Company, the Bank’s wholly-owned real estate subsidiary. This was more than offset by the net loss recorded in the current quarter.

          The following table is a reconciliation of the Bank’s stockholder’s equity to federal regulatory capital as of June 30, 2008.

Tangible Capital

Core Capital

Risk-Based Capital


(Dollars in Thousands)

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio


Stockholder’s equity

$

1,008,642

$

1,008,642

$

1,008,642

Adjustments:

Deductions:

Investment in real estate subsidiary

(61,686

)

(61,686

)

(61,686

)

Non-permitted mortgage servicing rights

(2,356

)

(2,356

)

(2,356

)

Additions:

Unrealized losses on investment securities

available for sale

304

304

304

General loss allowance – investment in DSL

Service Company

6,476

6,476

6,476

Allowance for credit losses, net of specific

allowances (a)

-

-

97,431


Regulatory capital

951,380

7.57

%

951,380

7.57

%

1,048,811

14.31

%

Well capitalized requirement

188,540

1.50

(b)

628,465

5.00

732,871

10.00

(c)


Excess

$

762,840

6.07

%

$

322,915

2.57

%

$

315,940

4.31

%


(a) Limited to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets.
(b) Represents the minimum requirement for tangible capital, as no “well capitalized” requirement has been established for this category.
(c) A third requirement is Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 6.00%, which the Bank met and exceeded with a ratio of 12.98%.
Page 65
Navigation Links

ITEM 3. – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

          For information regarding quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk, see Asset/Liability Management and Market Risk on page 48.

ITEM 4. – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

          As of June 30, 2008, Downey carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of Downey’s management, including Downey’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of Downey’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded Downey’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. There have been no significant changes during the most recent quarter in Downey’s internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the evaluation date.

          Disclosure controls and procedures are defined in SEC rules as controls and other procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Downey’s disclosure controls and procedures were designed to ensure that material information related to Downey, including subsidiaries, is made known to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, in a timely manner.

Page 66
Navigation Links

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. – Legal Proceedings

          On October 29, 2004, two former traditional branch employees brought an action in Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC323796, entitled Margie Holman and Alice A. Mesec, et al. v. Downey Savings and Loan Association. The first amended complaint seeks unspecified damages for alleged unpaid regular and overtime wages, inadequate meal breaks, failure to pay split-shift and reporting time wages, and related claims. The plaintiffs are seeking class action status to represent all other current and former Bank employees who held the position of Customer Service Supervisor and/or Customer Service Representative at the Bank’s in-store branches at any time from October 29, 2000 to date. The Bank has opposed the claim and asserted all appropriate defenses, and has provided for what is believed to be a reasonable estimate of exposure for this matter in the event of loss. While acknowledging the uncertainties of litigation, management believes that the ultimate outcome of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on Downey’s operations, cash flows or financial position.

          Two purported shareholder class actions, one brought on behalf of Waterford Township General Employees Retirement System, Case No. CV-08-03261, and the other brought on behalf of Stephen J. Mihalacki, Case No. SACV08-00609, were filed on May 16, 2008 and June 2, 2008, respectively, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against the Holding Company and certain of its current and former officers and certain former directors. The complaints, filed on behalf of all persons who purchased Holding Company common stock during October 16, 2006 to March 14, 2008, seek unspecified damages for alleged violation of federal securities laws, claiming that the defendants made misleading statements and omissions regarding Downey’s business and financial results, thereby artificially inflating the common stock price. Specifically, the plaintiffs contend that the defendants concealed that (a) the Bank’s portfolio of option ARMs contained millions of dollars worth of impaired and risky securities; (b) the Bank had been aggressive in acquiring loans from mortgage brokers that were highly risky; (c) the Bank had failed to properly account for highly leveraged loans; (d) the Bank had inadequate underwriting practices, which led to large numbers of loan defaults; and (e) the Bank had not adequately reserved for option ARM loans. A motion to consolidate the two actions is pending, after which it is expected that the plaintiffs will file a consolidated complaint.

          Related to the shareholder class actions, two purported shareholder derivative lawsuits, one entitled Michael L. McDougall v. Daniel D. Rosenthal, et al., Case No. 30-2008-00180029, and the other entitled Joyce Mendlin v. Maurice L. McAlister, et al., Case No. 30-2008-00087854, were filed on June 10, 2008 and July 28, 2008, respectively, in Orange County Superior Court, in California. The plaintiffs, who purport to bring the lawsuits on behalf of the Holding Company against certain of its current and former officers, its current directors and certain former directors, allege that commencing in October 2006, the defendants caused or allowed Downey to issue a series of press releases and other statements that significantly overstated Downey’s business prospects and financial results; that the statements failed to disclose that Downey was more exposed to the subprime market crisis than it had disclosed; that Downey’s portfolio of subprime and option ARM mortgage-related assets was overvalued; and that as a result, Downey’s reported earnings and business prospects were inaccurate. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants’ action constitutes breaches of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment, and seek, among other relief, unspecified damages to be paid to the Holding Company, corporate governance reforms, and equitable and injunctive relief, including restitution and the creation of a constructive trust.

          Downey has been named as a defendant in other legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, none of which, in the opinion of management, will have a material adverse effect on its operations, cash flows or financial position.

ITEM 1A. – Risk Factors

          Downey’s 2007 Form 10-K presents, on pages 22 to 27, a comprehensive set of risk factors that may impact Downey’s future results. Given recent developments in the mortgage, housing and secondary markets, we are adding the following:

          Downey’s access to liquidity sources may be negatively impacted if market conditions and regulatory restrictions persist or if further ratings downgrades occur.

          While Downey actively manages its liquidity risk and maintains liquidity at least sufficient to cover all maturing debt obligations or other forecasted funding requirements, Downey’s liquidity may be affected by an inability to access the capital markets or by unforeseen or extraordinary demands on cash. This situation may arise due to circumstances beyond Downey’s control, and is subject to the Holding Company’s and the Bank’s credit ratings as assigned by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. Recent disruptions in the capital markets have substantially limited the ability of mortgage originators, including Downey, to sell mortgage loans to the capital markets through whole loan sales or securitization. As a result, Downey has experienced a general loss of liquidity in most secondary markets for its loans.

Page 67
Navigation Links

Downey cannot forecast if or when market liquidity conditions will improve from current stresses, although it is Downey’s expectation that the existing turmoil in the financial and credit markets may continue to affect its performance at least throughout 2008.

          On July 25, 2008, following Downey’s second quarter earnings release on July 24, 2008, Moody’s Investors Service downgraded the Holding Company’s senior unsecured debt rating to “B1” from “Ba1.” In addition, the Bank’s financial strength was downgraded to “D” from the previous rating of a “D+,” long-term deposit rating to “Ba2” from “Baa3” and short-term deposits to “Not Prime” from “Prime-3,” with the ratings of both the Holding Company and the Bank under review for downgrade. On July 26, 2008, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services lowered its senior unsecured and counterparty credit rating on the Holding Company to “BB+/B” from “BBB-/A-3.” In addition, the Bank’s counterparty and deposit ratings were lowered to “BBB-/A-3” from “BBB/A-2,” with the ratings of both the Holding Company and the Bank on negative watch. These lower ratings, and any further ratings downgrades, could make it more difficult for the Holding Company and the Bank to access the capital markets going forward, as the cost to borrow or raise capital would most likely become more expensive. The cost of the Bank’s primary funding sources (deposits and FHLB borrowings) is not influenced directly by the Bank’s credit ratings.

          In addition, the Holding Company may not issue new debt or renew existing debt without prior non-objection of the OTS.

          Current market conditions have also limited the Bank’s liquidity sources principally to secured funding outlets such as the FHLB and, as back-up, the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, and to FDIC-insured deposits originated through the Bank’s branch network. Other sources of funding, such as medium-term notes and uninsured institutional deposits, have largely been closed to the Bank. There can be no assurance that actions by the FHLB or the Federal Reserve Bank would not reduce or eliminate our borrowing capacity or that we would be able to continue to attract deposits at competitive rates. Such events could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

          Future regulatory actions may also adversely impact our ability to raise funds through deposits. In particular, there is currently no restriction on our ability to acquire deposits through deposit brokers (although we have not generally done so) or on the rates we may offer on deposits to attract customers. If our capital position were to deteriorate, or other circumstances were to occur, such that we become classified as an “adequately capitalized” institution (or in any lower regulatory capital category), we could be prohibited from acquiring funds through deposit brokers and from paying rates on deposits that are significantly higher than the prevailing rates of interest on deposits offered by insured depository institutions in our normal market area.

          After the end of the second quarter, the Bank experienced elevated levels of deposit withdrawals. More recently, in response to steps taken by management to address the situation, the Bank has experienced net deposit inflows. If the Bank’s deposit levels continue to stabilize with withdrawals at historical levels, Downey believes its current sources of funds would enable Downey to meet its obligations while maintaining liquidity at appropriate levels. However, if elevated levels of net deposit outflows resume, the Bank’s usual sources of liquidity could become depleted, and the Bank would be required to raise additional capital or enter into new financing arrangements to satisfy its liquidity needs. In the current economic environment, there are no assurances that we would be able to raise additional capital or enter into additional financing arrangements.

          The OTS restrictions on the Bank’s and the Holding Company’s ability to pay dividends, and on the Holding Company’s ability to issue new debt or renew its existing debt, may adversely affect our ability to pay dividends and ultimately to service our Holding Company debt.

          Our ability to pay regular quarterly dividends to our stockholders and to pay interest on our debt at the Holding Company level depends to a large extent upon the dividends we receive from the Bank. The OTS, the Bank’s principal regulator, has prohibited the Bank from paying dividends to the Holding Company without the OTS’s prior approval. In addition, the OTS has prohibited the Holding Company from paying dividends (after the quarterly dividend payable in August 2008) without the OTS’s prior non-objection.

          At June 30, 2008, the Holding Company’s liquid assets, including amounts deposited with the Bank, totaled $53 million. Management believes that the Holding Company, on a stand-alone basis, currently has adequate liquid assets to meet its current obligations, which are primarily interest payments on $199 million of senior notes. However, in the longer term, the Holding Company’s ability to service its senior debt depends on its ability to receive dividends from the Bank and, when the notes mature, on its ability to renew or refinance the senior debt. However, the OTS has prohibited the Holding Company to issue or renew debt without its non-objection.We cannot predict whether the OTS will approve payments of dividends by the Bank to the Holding Company, or will object to the payment of future Holding Company dividends or how long these OTS restrictions will remain in effect.

Page 68
Navigation Links

ITEM 2. – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

          None.

ITEM 3. – Defaults Upon Senior Securities

          None.

ITEM 4. – Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

          On April 23, 2008, Downey held its annual meeting of shareholders to elect three Class 1 Directors for terms of three years each and to ratify the Board of Directors’ appointment of KPMG LLP as auditors for the year ending December 31, 2008. The number of votes cast at the meeting as to each matter acted upon was as follows:

1.

Election of Directors:

Nominees

Votes For

Votes Withheld

Unvoted


Gary W. Brummett

21,380,878

2,937,522

3,535,383

Maurice L. McAlister

19,493,414

4,824,986

3,535,383

Daniel D. Rosenthal

19,835,756

4,482,644

3,535,383

The Directors whose terms continued and the years their terms expire are as follows:

Continuing Directors

Year Term Expires


Michael B. Abrahams

2009

Brent McQuarrie

2009

Lester C. Smull

2009

Michael D. Bozarth

2010

James H. Hunter

2010

Jane Wolfe

2010

2.

Ratification of appointment of KPMG LLP as auditors for the year ending December 31, 2008:

Votes For

Votes Against

Abstain

Unvoted


18,748,062

5,565,469

4,869

3,535,383


ITEM 5. – Other Information

          None.

ITEM 6. – Exhibits

Exhibit

Number

Description


31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


Page 69
Navigation Links

AVAILABILITY OF REPORTS

          Corporate governance guidelines, charters for the audit, compensation, and nominating and corporate governance committees of the Board of Directors and codes of business conduct and ethics are available free of charge from our internet site, www.downeysavings.com by clicking on “Investor Relations” on our home page and proceeding to “Corporate Governance.” Annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports are posted on our internet site as soon as reasonably practical after we file them with the SEC and available free of charge under “Corporate Filings” on our “Investor Relations” page.

          We will furnish any or all of the non-confidential exhibits upon payment of a reasonable fee. Please send request for exhibits and/or fee information to:

 

Downey Financial Corp.
3501 Jamboree Road
Newport Beach, California 92660
Attention: Corporate Secretary

 

SIGNATURES

          Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

DOWNEY FINANCIAL CORP.

/s/ Thomas E. Prince


Date: August 11, 2008

Thomas E. Prince

Chief Executive Officer (interim)

/s/ Brian E. Côté


Date: August 11, 2008

Brian E. Côté

Chief Financial Officer


Page 70
Navigation Links

 

NAVIGATION   LINKS

FORM 10-Q COVER

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ITEM 2. – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

ITEM 3. – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

ITEM 4. – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. – Legal Proceedings

ITEM 1A. – Risk Factors

ITEM 2. – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

ITEM 3. – Defaults Upon Senior Securities

ITEM 4. – Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

ITEM 5. – Other Information

ITEM 6. – Exhibits

AVAILABILITY OF REPORTS

SIGNATURES