e10vq
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                     to                    
Commission File Number 000-51828
EAGLE TEST SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Delaware   36-2917389
(State of incorporation)   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
     
2200 Millbrook Drive, Buffalo Grove, Illinois   60089
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (847) 367-8282
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal year, if changed since last report)
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer þ   Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 22,974,177 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding as of July 28, 2008.
 
 

 


 

Table of Contents
EAGLE TEST SYSTEMS, INC.
(“The Company”)
INDEX
         
    Page  
       
 
       
       
 
       
    3  
 
       
    4  
 
       
    5  
 
       
    6  
 
       
    10  
 
       
    16  
 
       
    16  
 
       
       
 
       
    17  
 
       
    17  
 
       
    17  
 
       
    18  
 
       
    18  
 
       
    18  
 
       
    18  
 
       
Signatures
    19  
Exhibit Index
    20  
Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement between Eagle Test Systems, Inc. and Leonard Foxman
Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement between Eagle Test Systems, Inc. and Theodore Foxman
Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement between Eagle Test Systems, Inc. and Steve Hawrysz
Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement between Eagle Test Systems, Inc. and Jack Weimer
       
Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 302
       
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 302
       
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
       
 EX-10.1
 EX-10.2
 EX-10.3
 EX-10.4
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1

2


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
EAGLE TEST SYSTEMS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
                 
    June 30,     September 30,  
    2008     2007  
    (unaudited)          
ASSETS
               
 
               
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 41,244     $ 10,302  
Marketable securities
    43,410       102,215  
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $484 and $585 as of June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, respectively
    24,599       18,238  
Inventories
    36,798       22,233  
Deferred income taxes
    5,185       4,410  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    1,667       3,857  
 
           
Total current assets
    152,903       161,255  
Property, plant and equipment, net
    14,302       10,782  
Marketable securities
    28,609        
Deferred income taxes
    471        
Other assets
    571       533  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 196,856     $ 172,570  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
 
               
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 6,005     $ 6,079  
Current portion of capital lease obligations
    201       270  
Deferred revenue
    10,326       6,441  
Accrued compensation and related liabilities
    4,496       3,357  
Accrued income taxes
    1,346       416  
Other accrued expenses
    3,902       2,659  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    26,276       19,222  
Long-term liabilities:
               
Capital lease obligations, less current portion
    29       124  
Deferred income taxes
          900  
Other long-term liabilities
    440       434  
 
           
Total long-term liabilities
    469       1,458  
 
           
Stockholders’ equity:
               
 
               
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding
           
 
               
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 90,000,000 shares authorized, 22,974,177 shares issued and outstanding
    230       230  
Additional paid in capital
    175,483       174,474  
Accumulated deficit
    (4,673 )     (22,814 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
    (929 )      
 
           
Total stockholders’ equity
    170,111       151,890  
 
           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 196,856     $ 172,570  
 
           
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

EAGLE TEST SYSTEMS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF NET INCOME
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
                                 
    Three Months     Nine Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    (unaudited)     (unaudited)  
    2008     2007     2008     2007  
Net revenue
  $ 35,459     $ 19,858     $ 99,593     $ 65,202  
Cost of goods sold
    12,185       7,490       36,718       25,787  
 
                       
Gross profit
    23,274       12,368       62,875       39,415  
Operating expenses
                               
Selling, general and administrative
    10,112       8,212       28,618       24,294  
Research and development
    3,150       2,353       9,352       6,715  
 
                       
Operating income
    10,012       1,803       24,905       8,406  
Interest expense
    4       94       12       345  
Other (income) and expense
                               
Income from marketable securities
    (927 )     (1,091 )     (3,146 )     (3,559 )
Other income
                      (8 )
 
                       
Income before taxes
    10,935       2,800       28,039       11,628  
Provision for income taxes
    4,114       792       9,898       3,915  
 
                       
Net income
  $ 6,821     $ 2,008     $ 18,141     $ 7,713  
 
                       
 
                               
Net income per share, basic
  $ 0.30     $ 0.09     $ 0.79     $ 0.34  
 
                       
 
                               
Net income per share, diluted
  $ 0.30     $ 0.09     $ 0.79     $ 0.33  
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic
    22,974,177       22,957,154       22,974,177       22,895,597  
 
                       
Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted
    23,071,585       23,170,193       23,096,584       23,123,810  
 
                       
 
                               
Comprehensive Income:
                               
Net income
  $ 6,821     $ 2,008     $ 18,141     $ 7,713  
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of taxes
    (135 )           (929 )      
 
                       
Comprehensive income
  $ 6,686     $ 2,008     $ 17,212     $ 7,713  
 
                       
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

EAGLE TEST SYSTEMS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
                 
    Nine Months Ended  
    June 30,  
    2008     2007  
    (unaudited)  
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
Net income
  $ 18,141     $ 7,713  
 
               
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    2,974       2,624  
Gain on sale of property and equipment
          (9 )
Non-cash compensation related to stock options
    1,009       380  
Excess tax benefits from stock based compensation
          (395 )
Deferred income taxes
    (1,534 )     (1,237 )
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Accounts receivable
    (6,361 )     3,420  
Inventories
    (14,522 )     2,992  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    2,190       407  
Other assets
    (38 )     132  
Accounts payable
    (74 )     (2,016 )
Deferred revenue
    3,885       (7,352 )
Accrued compensation and related liabilities
    1,139       (2,473 )
Accrued income taxes
    930       (31 )
Other accrued expenses
    1,243       (296 )
Other liabilities
    6       31  
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    8,988       3,890  
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Net purchases of marketable securities
          (76,990 )
Net proceeds from the sales of marketable securities
    28,655        
Sale of property and equipment
          9  
Capital expenditures
    (6,537 )     (2,230 )
 
           
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    22,118       (79,211 )
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Payments of capital lease obligations
    (164 )     (178 )
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs
          34,836  
Excess tax benefits from stock based compensation
          395  
 
           
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    (164 )     35,053  
 
           
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    30,942       (40,268 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    10,302       51,071  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 41,244     $ 10,803  
 
           
Supplemental disclosure:
               
Transfer of equipment from fixed assets to inventory
  $ 43     $ 505  
 
           
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

EAGLE TEST SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
1. The Company
     Eagle Test Systems, Inc. (the Company) designs, manufactures, sells, and services automated test equipment (ATE) for the semiconductor industry. The Company’s test systems test analog, mixed-signal, and RF (Radio Frequency) semiconductor devices. Semiconductor designers and manufacturers worldwide use semiconductor test systems to test devices at different stages during the manufacturing process. These tested devices are incorporated into a wide range of products, including digital cameras, MP3 players, cellular telephones, video/multimedia products, automotive electronics, computer peripherals, and notebook and desktop computers. The Company is headquartered in Buffalo Grove, Illinois, where the Company develops and manufactures its test systems. The Company operates in one industry segment: the design, manufacture and marketing of automated test equipment. The Company also maintains various offices worldwide for sales, service and research to support its customer base directly. The operations of, and net investment in, foreign subsidiaries are not material.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
     The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned foreign subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
     The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial information should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended September 30, 2007, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year.
Preparation of Financial Statements and Use of Estimates
     The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company and reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the results of operations for the interim period. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results can differ from those estimates.
Stock Options
     The Company records compensation expense using the fair value of options granted over the vesting period on a straight-line basis including those options that are subject to graded vesting. Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 123R, the Company uses the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model to determine the fair value of the options granted. This model uses such factors as the market price of the underlying shares at date of issuance, exercise price of the option, the expected term of the option, which is approximately six years, utilizing the simplified method as set forth in Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107, a risk free interest rate range of approximately 2.1% to 4.9%, and an expected volatility rate range of approximately 54% to 67%, based upon a peer group of companies given limited historical data for the Company’s own stock. On December 21, 2007, SAB No. 110 was issued which extended the use of the simplified method, which was set to expire on December 31, 2007, in certain situations when sufficient option exercise history does not exist. The Company continues to use the simplified method, due to the lack of sufficient option exercise history. The fair value of $2,487 for options granted thus far in fiscal 2008 will be amortized to expense as vesting occurs, which is typically over five years. Expense recognized under SFAS No. 123R for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $312 ($273 net of taxes) or $0.01 per basic and diluted share and $202 ($169 net of taxes) or $0.01 per basic and diluted share, respectively. Expense recognized under SFAS 123R for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $1,009 ($908 net of taxes) or $0.04 per basic and diluted share and $380 ($323 net of taxes) or $0.01 per basic and diluted share, respectively.

6


Table of Contents

EAGLE TEST SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
3. Marketable Securities
     At June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, the Company’s marketable securities were invested in variable rate demand notes (VRDNs) and auction rate securities (ARSs). The VRDNs have a put option back to the financial institution remarketing agent that provides for liquidity within 2 to 5 days and these instruments trade at par value. Since the put option is not with the original issuer, the VRDNs are classified as marketable securities available for sale. As of June 30, 2008, the Company had $34,150 of auction rate securities (ARSs), which are variable rate securities, most of which are AA/AAA rated and collateralized by student loans ($28,850 at par) or municipal revenues ($5,300 at par) and are substantially guaranteed by a U.S. Department of Education agency or a third party insurer. The ARSs are typically bought and sold in a Dutch auction process that resets the interest rate through buyers and sellers stipulating the reset interest rate for the par value of the securities. While the underlying securities for the ARSs have a long-term nominal maturity, the interest rate is reset through a Dutch auction process at predetermined intervals of 7 to 35 days. Starting in mid February 2008, the Company experienced difficulties in selling the ARSs due to the failure of auctions. These failed auctions represent market liquidity risk and not defaults or credit events. Holders of the securities continue to receive interest on the investment, currently at a predetermined maximum rate based on a spread above named market rate indices or a penalty interest rate stipulated in the bond indenture, and the securities will be auctioned every 7 to 35 days until the auction succeeds, the issuer calls the securities or they mature. Based upon the Company’s valuation analysis, which included factors such as type of security, tax status, credit quality, duration, insurance and the portfolio composition as well as observable market data including yield or spreads of trading instruments, the Company has recorded an unrealized loss of $1,541 ($929 net of tax) as of June 30, 2008. Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115 (SFAS 115), Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, as well as other related accounting guidance, the Company considered whether the recent liquidity issues and decline in value is temporary as of June 30, 2008. The Company has the intent and ability to hold these ARSs until the recent liquidity issues become resolved, which management believes could take more than 12 months. Accordingly, the Company recorded the unrealized loss as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. During July, 2008, ARSs of $4,000 collateralized by student loans were called by the issuers at par. Therefore, those ARSs were classified as current assets as of June 30, 2008. The estimated fair value of the remaining ARSs are classified as noncurrent assets as of June 30, 2008.
     The carrying value of marketable securities as of the dates indicated are as follows:
                 
    June 30,     September 30,  
    2008     2007  
Short-term marketable securities:
               
Auction rate securities
  $ 4,000     $ 53,940  
Variable rate demand notes
    39,410       48,275  
 
           
 
  $ 43,410     $ 102,215  
 
           
 
               
Long-term marketable securities:
               
Auction rate securities
  $ 28,609     $  
 
           
 
  $ 28,609     $  
 
           
4. Inventories
     Inventories consist of the following:
                 
    June 30,     September 30,  
    2008     2007  
Raw materials
  $ 14,097     $ 7,766  
Work-in-process
    4,350       4,499  
Finished goods
    15,917       8,317  
Inventory at customers under purchase orders
    2,434       1,651  
 
           
 
  $ 36,798     $ 22,233  
 
           
     The Company’s policy is to establish inventory reserves when conditions exist that suggest inventory may be in excess of anticipated demand or is obsolete based upon assumptions about future demand for products or market conditions. The Company regularly evaluates the ability to realize the value of its inventory based on a combination of factors including the following: forecasted sales or usage, estimated product end-of-life dates, estimated current and future market value and new product introductions. Purchasing and alternative usage options are also explored to mitigate obsolete inventory exposure. When recorded, reserves are intended to reduce the carrying value of inventory to its net realizable value. Inventory of $36,798 is stated net of inventory reserves of $9,214 as of June 30, 2008. Inventory of $22,233 is stated net of inventory reserves of $8,377 as of September 30, 2007. If actual demand for products deteriorates or market conditions are less favorable than those the Company projects, additional inventory reserves may be required.

7


Table of Contents

EAGLE TEST SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
5. Stockholders’ Equity
Equity Offerings
     On October 3, 2006, the Company completed a public offering to sell 2,000,000 shares of common stock to the public at an offering price of $16.50 per share, generating net proceeds of $30,524, which includes $422 of offering expenses recorded in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006. Because the shares were sold on September 27, 2006, the transaction was included in stockholders’ equity and the gross proceeds of $31,185 recorded as a receivable from the sale of common stock in the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2006. On October 11, 2006, the underwriters exercised their option to purchase an additional 200,000 shares of common stock at an offering price of $16.50 per share, generating net proceeds of $3,119.
6. Net Income Per Share
     Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted income per common share reflects the maximum dilution that would have resulted from the assumed exercise of stock options and is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares and all dilutive securities outstanding unless the computation is anti-dilutive.
     A reconciliation between basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) is as follows:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2008     2007     2008     2007  
Net income
  $ 6,821     $ 2,008     $ 18,141     $ 7,713  
Basic EPS:
                               
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
    22,974,177       22,957,154       22,974,177       22,895,597  
Basic net income per common share
  $ 0.30     $ 0.09     $ 0.79     $ 0.34  
 
                       
Diluted EPS:
                               
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
    22,974,177       22,957,154       22,974,177       22,895,597  
Plus impact of stock options
    97,408       213,039       122,407       228,213  
 
                       
Diluted common shares
    23,071,585       23,170,193       23,096,584       23,123,810  
 
                       
Diluted EPS
  $ 0.30     $ 0.09     $ 0.79     $ 0.33  
 
                       
7. Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
     Comprehensive income is comprised of two components, net income and other comprehensive income. The components of other comprehensive income, and related tax effects were as follows:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2008     2007     2008     2007  
Unrealized losses on marketable securities, net of taxes of $(89) and $(612)
  $ (135 )   $     $ (929 )   $  
 
                       
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes
  $ (135 )   $     $ (929 )   $  
 
                       
     At June 30, 2008, we held marketable securities in auction rate securities that have failed the Dutch auction process that is used for setting interest rates on these types of securities. The Company recorded an unrealized loss of $224 ($135 net of tax) and $1,541 ($929 net of tax) related to these investments for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008. Refer to Note 3 “Marketable Securities” for additional disclosure.

8


Table of Contents

EAGLE TEST SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
8. Income Taxes
     The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method whereby the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the book value and the tax basis of assets and liabilities are recognized as deferred tax assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to be recognized. The Company’s effective tax rate will vary to the extent items used to derive book taxable income are not deductible for income tax purposes. The Company’s income tax expense was $4,114 for a 37.6% effective tax rate, and $9,898 for a 35.3% effective tax rate, for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. The primary reason for the difference in the effective tax rates for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2008, is the decrease in tax exempt investment income relative to total taxable income during the three months ended June 30, 2008. The Company’s income tax expense was $792 for a 28.3% effective tax rate, and $3,915 for a 33.7% effective tax rate, for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007, respectively. The primary reason for the difference in the effective tax rates for these periods is the increase in tax exempt investment income relative to total taxable income during the three months ended June 30, 2007.
     In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods and disclosure. The Company adopted FIN 48 effective October 1, 2007. The adoption did not have an effect on the results of operations or financial condition. The Company did not have any unrecognized tax benefits as of October 1, 2007 or June 30, 2008. If interest and penalties would need to be accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits, such amounts would be recognized as a component of income tax expense, while prior to adoption of FIN 48, the interest and penalties were recognized as components of interest expense and selling, general and administrative expense, respectively.
     The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax, as well as income tax from multiple state and foreign jurisdictions. As of June 30, 2008, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examination for fiscal years before 2005. The Company is no longer subject to major state or foreign income tax examination for fiscal years before 2004. The Company does not anticipate any material adjustments to its financial statements resulting from tax examinations for fiscal 2004 currently in progress.
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Contingencies
     The Company’s sales agreements indemnify its customers for any expenses or liabilities resulting from claimed infringements of patents, trademarks, or copyrights of third parties. The terms of these indemnification agreements are generally indefinite after execution of the agreement. The maximum amount of potential future indemnification is unlimited. However, to date, the Company has not paid any claims or been required to defend any lawsuits with respect to any claim.
     From time to time, the Company may have certain contingent liabilities that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities. The Company accrues contingent liabilities when it is probable that future expenditures will be made and such expenditures can be reasonably estimated. In the opinion of management, there are no pending claims of which the outcome is expected to result in a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.
Product Warranty
     The Company’s systems are sold with warranty provisions that require the Company to remedy deficiencies in quality or performance of its products over a period ranging from 12 to 24 months. The policy of the Company is to establish warranty reserves at the time revenue is recognized at levels that represent the estimate of costs that will be incurred to fulfill those warranty requirements.
     The following table shows the details of the product warranty accrual:
Product Warranty Activity
                 
    Nine Months Ended  
    June 30,  
    2008     2007  
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 993     $ 1,068  
Warranty expenditures
    (1,837 )     (1,725 )
Provisions for warranty
    2,098       1,720  
 
           
Balance at end of period
  $ 1,254     $ 1,063  
 
           

9


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward Looking Statements And Projections
     This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward looking statements. Forward looking statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. We generally identify forward looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “could,” “intends,” “target,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other similar words. These statements are only predictions. We have based these forward looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. The outcome of the events described in these forward looking statements is subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and in the “Risk Factors” contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2007. Accordingly, you should not rely upon forward looking statements as predictions of future events. We cannot assure you that the events and circumstances reflected in the forward looking statements will be achieved or occur, and actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward looking statements. The forward looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Overview
     We design, manufacture, sell and service high-performance ATE for the semiconductor industry. Our test equipment addresses our customers’ volume production needs and is designed to enable our customers to achieve low overall cost-of-test per device. Our innovative products test analog, mixed-signal and RF semiconductors. Semiconductors tested by our systems are incorporated into a wide range of products in high-growth markets, including digital cameras, MP3 players, cellular telephones, video/multimedia products, automotive electronics, computer peripherals, and notebook and desktop computers.
     Our business and operating results depend significantly on the level of capital expenditures by companies in the semiconductor industry. Historically, the semiconductor industry has been highly cyclical with recurring periods of over-supply and under-supply, which has resulted in wide fluctuations in demand for our products and services. These demand fluctuations have resulted in significant variations in our revenue, expenses and results of operations. Fluctuations are likely to continue in future periods.
     Changes in industry conditions often occur very rapidly and can be very difficult to predict. Thus, we cannot foresee the timing and extent of such changes or their effect on our customer orders and revenue with significant accuracy. In addition, these cycles typically have a disproportionately negative impact on capital equipment manufacturers, including providers of test systems. As part of our strategy to address this volatility and lack of visibility, we outsource a substantial portion of our manufacturing functions to third party subcontractors. The purpose of this strategic outsourcing model is to reduce our fixed costs and working capital requirements, making our expense structure more flexible during downturns. Outsourcing also allows us to increase production rapidly to capitalize on market opportunities during upturns. We believe our outsourcing strategy provides us with the flexibility to respond more rapidly to changes in industry conditions and demand for our test systems.
     Historically, a significant portion of our revenue in each quarter and year has been derived from sales to relatively few customers. While we seek to expand and diversify our customer base, we expect our revenue to continue to be derived from a small number of customers. In the three months ended June 30, 2008, sales to Texas Instruments Incorporated and Intersil Corporation accounted for 28.1% and 10.7% of our net revenue, respectively, and sales to our five largest customers accounted for an aggregate of 66.1% of our net revenue. In the three months ended June 30, 2007, sales to Texas Instruments Incorporated and ON Semiconductor Corporation accounted for 29.3% and 14.1% of our net revenue, respectively, and sales to our five largest customers accounted for an aggregate of 62.2% of our net revenue.
     During a given quarter, a significant portion of our revenue may be derived from the sale of a relatively small number of test systems. Our test systems range widely in average selling price, depending upon many factors such as model, configuration and level of testing resources sold with the system. Consequently, a small change in the number or product mix of systems sold may cause significant changes in our operating results. Thus, we do not believe that period-to-period comparisons of our financial results are necessarily meaningful, and they should not be relied upon as an indication of our future performance.
     On October 3, 2006, the Company closed a public offering to sell 2,000,000 shares of common stock to the public at an offering price of $16.50 per share, generating net proceeds of $30,524. Since the shares were sold on September 27, 2006, the transaction was included in stockholders’ equity and the gross proceeds of $31,185 recorded as a receivable from sale of common stock as of September 30, 2006. On October 11, 2006, the underwriters exercised their option to purchase an additional 200,000 shares, generating net proceeds of $3,119. The Company retained the proceeds for working capital and general corporate purposes.

10


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
     The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in our financial statements and the accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable. Although these estimates are based on our present best knowledge of the future impact on us of current events and actions, actual results may differ from these estimates, assumptions and judgments.
     We consider “critical” those accounting policies that require our most subjective or complex judgments, which often result from a need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain, and that are among the most important of our accounting policies in the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations. These critical accounting policies are: revenue recognition, marketable securities, valuation of excess and obsolete inventory, accounting for warranty reserves, determination of our allowance for sales returns and uncollectibles, stock-based compensation, and income taxes.
     Revenue Recognition. We derive revenue primarily from sales of test systems and individual resource boards. Substantially all of our revenue to date has been denominated in United States dollars. Revenue related to test system sales is recognized when:
    we have a written sales agreement;
 
    delivery has occurred or services have been rendered;
 
    the price is fixed or determinable; and
 
    collectibility is reasonably assured.
     Installation services are generally part of the test system sale. Revenue from test system sales is deferred until the test system is delivered, installed and accepted at the customer location.
     When sales to a customer involve multiple elements, revenue is recognized on the delivered element, provided that the undelivered element is a standard product with evidence of fair value, there is a history of acceptance of the product with the customer, and the undelivered element is not essential to the customer’s application. When a sale of a test system includes post contract customer support, or PCS, revenue for the PCS is recognized ratably over the PCS period. Revenue related to individual resource boards is recognized upon shipment.
     In a few instances we have entered into short-term rental agreements with customers for the use of our test systems. We recognize rental revenue ratably over the applicable rental period. Rental revenue is included as a component of test system sales and has been immaterial to date.
     Marketable Securities. We invest available cash in marketable securities as part of our cash management practices. Generally all of these investments are highly liquid in nature; however, investments that have maturities of greater than 90 days from the date of purchase are classified as marketable securities. Classification of marketable securities as current or non-current is dependent on management’s intended holding period, the securities maturity date and liquidity considerations based upon market conditions. If management intends to hold the securities for longer than one year as of the balance sheet date or if the market effectively prevents their liquidation or resale, the investments are classified as non-current. The valuation of our investment portfolio is subject to uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Factors that may impact its valuation include changes to credit ratings of the securities as well as to the underlying assets supporting those securities, rates of default of the underlying assets, underlying collateral value, discount rates and ongoing strength and quality of market credit and liquidity. In the absence of successful auctions to sell auction rate securities, we determine fair value of our auction rate securities using a valuation model which factors in the type of security, tax status, credit quality, duration, insurance and the portfolio composition as well as observable market data including yield or spreads of trading instruments.
     Market fluctuations in marketable securities are reflected in other comprehensive income unless a market decline is considered to be other than temporary. The Company records unrealized impairment losses of other-than-temporary impairments in investments if the market value of an investment remains significantly below cost for more than six consecutive months and the decline is considered permanent. Realized gains and losses on sales of marketable securities are determined based upon average cost.
     Inventory Reserves. We state our inventories at the lower of cost or estimated market value, determined on a first-in, first-out method. We establish inventory reserves when conditions exist that suggest inventory may be in excess of anticipated demand or is obsolete based upon assumptions about future demand for test systems or market conditions. We evaluate the ability to realize the value of our inventory based on a combination of factors, including forecasted sales or usage, estimated product end-of-life dates, estimated current and future market value and new product introductions. Purchasing and alternative usage options are also explored to mitigate obsolete inventory exposure. If actual demand for test systems deteriorates or market conditions are less favorable than those we project, additional inventory reserves may be required.
     We determine the valuation of excess and obsolete inventory by making our best estimate considering the current quantities of inventory on hand and our forecast of the need for this inventory to support future sales of our test systems. We often have limited information on which to base our forecasts. If future sales differ from these forecasts, the valuation of excess and obsolete inventory may change.
     Warranty Reserves. Our test systems are sold with warranty provisions that require us to remedy deficiencies in quality or performance of our test systems. We are also subject to laws and regulations in the various countries in which we sell regarding vendor obligations to ensure product performance. At the time we recognize revenue from a test system’s sale, we determine the reserve for the future cost of meeting our obligations under the standard warranties and product performance laws and regulations by

11


Table of Contents

considering our historical experience with the costs of meeting these obligations. If the future costs of meeting these obligations differ from our historical experience, additional reserves for warranty obligations may be required.
     Allowance for Sales Returns and Uncollectibles. We determine our allowance for sales returns and uncollectibles by making our best estimate considering our historical accounts receivable collection experience, current economic trends, changes in customer payment terms and recent information that we have about the current status of our accounts receivable balances. If future conditions cause our collections experience to change or if we later obtain different information about the status of any or all of our accounts receivable, additional allowances for sales returns and uncollectibles may be required.
     Stock-Based Compensation. We expense stock options based upon the fair market value on the date of grant. We are amortizing the fair market value of options granted over the vesting service period of the options. Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No.123R, the Company uses the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model to determine the fair value of the options granted. This model uses such factors as the market price of the underlying shares at date of issuance, exercise price of the option, the expected term of the option, which is approximately six years, utilizing the simplified method as set forth in Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No.107, as extended by SAB No. 110, a risk free interest rate range of approximately 2.1% to 4.9% and an expected volatility rate range of approximately 54% to 67% based upon a peer group of companies given limited historical data for the Company’s own stock. Expense recognized for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 was $312 and $1,009, respectively. Expense recognized for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007 was $202 and $380, respectively.
     Income Taxes. We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method whereby the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the book value and the tax basis of assets and liabilities are recognized as deferred tax assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to be recognized. In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition, and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Accordingly, we adopted FIN 48 effective October 1, 2007. The adoption did not have an effect on our results of operations or financial condition. We did not have any unrecognized tax benefits as of October 1, 2007 or June 30, 2008.
Results of Operations
     The following sets forth certain operating data as a percentage of net revenue for the periods presented:
                                 
    Three Months   Nine Months
    Ended   Ended
    June 30,   June 30,
    2008   2007   2008   2007
Net revenue
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
Cost of goods sold
    34.4       37.7       36.9       39.5  
 
                               
Gross profit
    65.6       62.3       63.1       60.5  
Operating expenses
                               
Selling, general and administrative
    28.5       41.3       28.7       37.3  
Research and development
    8.9       11.9       9.4       10.3  
 
                               
Operating income
    28.2       9.1       25.0       12.9  
Interest expense
          0.5             0.5  
Income from marketable securities
    (2.6 )     (5.5 )     (3.1 )     (5.4 )
 
                               
Income before taxes
    30.8       14.1       28.1       17.8  
Provision for income taxes
    11.6       4.0       9.9       6.0  
 
                               
Net income
    19.2 %     10.1 %     18.2 %     11.8 %
 
                               
     The following sets forth our net revenue breakdown by geographic region, in thousands and as a percentage of net revenue, during the periods presented. Substantially all of our revenue to date has been denominated in United States dollars in thousands.
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2008     2007     2008     2007  
United States
  $ 10,826       30.5 %   $ 3,829       19.3 %   $ 28,841       29.0 %   $ 26,438       40.5 %
Malaysia
    12,058       34.0       2,712       13.7       35,240       35.4       10,616       16.3  
Philippines
    *       *       3,260       16.4       *       *       *       *  
Thailand
    *       *       2,399       12.1       *       *       *       *  
Other
    12,575       35.5       7,658       38.5       35,512       35.6       28,148       43.2  
 
                                               
Total
  $ 35,459       100.0 %   $ 19,858       100.0 %   $ 99,593       100.0 %   $ 65,202       100.0 %
 
                                               
 
*   Less than 10% of total revenues

12


Table of Contents

The following customers accounted for 10% or more of our net revenue in one or more of the periods presented:
                                 
    Three Months   Nine Months
    Ended   Ended
    June 30,   June 30,
    2008   2007   2008   2007
Intersil Corporation
    10.7 %     * %     * %     * %
ON Semiconductor Corporation
    *       14.1       *       10.5  
Texas Instruments Incorporated
    28.1 *     29.3       44.1       30.5  
 
*   Less than 10%.
     Comparison of Three and Nine Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
     Net Revenue. Net revenue increased to $35.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2008, an increase of $15.6 million or 78.6% over the comparable period in the preceding year. This increase was due to a general increase in tester shipments to semiconductor manufacturers who use our automated test equipment.
     Net revenue increased to $99.6 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2008, an increase of $34.4 million or 52.7% over the comparable period in the preceding year. This increase was primarily due to a $24.1 million increase in test system sales to Texas Instruments Incorporated and a general increase in tester shipments to semiconductor manufacturers who use our automated test equipment.
     Gross Profit. Gross profit was $23.3 million, or 65.6% of net revenue, in the three months ended June 30, 2008 and $12.4 million, or 62.3% of net revenue, in the same period in the prior fiscal year. Gross profit increased as a percentage of net revenue primarily due to increased sales and better utilization of overhead costs and manufacturing personnel due to higher volume production as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year.
     For the nine months ended June 30, 2008, gross profit was $62.9 million, or 63.1% of net revenue as compared to $39.4 million or 60.5% of net revenue in the same period in the prior fiscal year. Gross profit increased as a percentage of net revenue primarily due to increased sales and better utilization of overhead costs and manufacturing personnel due to higher volume production as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year.
     Selling, General and Administrative. SG&A expenses were $10.1 million, or 28.5% of net revenue, in the three months ended June 30, 2008, and $8.2 million, or 41.3% of net revenue, in the same period in the prior fiscal year, an increase of $1.9 million. The increase in SG&A expenses in the current quarter compared to the same period in the prior year was primarily due to $0.7 million of additional commission, incentive compensation and warranty accruals as a result of increased system sales and better operating performance, and $0.6 million of increased personnel costs related to sales and application engineers hired during the past year to support new customer initiatives, both domestically and internationally.
     For the nine months ended June 30, 2008, SG&A expenses were $28.6 million, or 28.7% of net revenue, and $24.3 million, or 37.3% of net revenue, in the same period in the prior fiscal year, an increase of $4.3 million. The increase was primarily due to $2.1 million of additional commission, incentive compensation and warranty accruals as a result of increased system sales and better operating performance, and $1.3 million of increased personnel costs related to sales and application engineers hired during the past year to support new customer initiatives, both domestically and internationally.
     Research and Development. R&D expenses were $3.2 million, or 8.9% of net revenue, in the three months ended June 30, 2008, and $2.4 million, or 11.9% of net revenue, in the same period in the prior fiscal year, an increase of $0.8 million. The increase in R&D expenses in the current quarter compared to the same period in the prior year was primarily due to $0.4 million in additional personnel and related facility costs for headcount and $0.4 million in additional contract R&D expenditures for project related work.
     For the nine months ended June 30, 2008, R&D expenses were $9.4 million, or 9.4% of net revenue, and $6.7 million, or 10.3% of net revenue, in the same period in the prior fiscal year, an increase of $2.6 million. The increase in R&D expenses in the current period compared to the same period in the prior year was primarily due to $1.4 million in additional contract R&D expenditures for project related work and $1.1 million in additional personnel and related facility costs.

13


Table of Contents

     Interest Expense. Interest expense was $4 and $94 in the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Interest expense is related to our capital lease obligations. Additionally, interest expense in the three months ended June 30, 2007 includes $87 related to interest due on amended tax returns.
     Interest expense was $12 and $345 in the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Interest expense in the nine months ended June 30, 2007 includes $252 related to a tax method change related to deferred revenue.
     Other Income. Other income decreased to $0.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $1.1 million in the same period in the prior fiscal year, primarily due to a decrease in the interest rates of investments included in our investment portfolio.
     Other income decreased to $3.1 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $3.6 million in the same period in the prior fiscal year, due to the same factors as noted in the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
     Provision for Income Taxes. Our income tax expense was $4.1 million, a 37.6% effective tax rate, in the three months ended June 30, 2008 and $0.8 million, a 28.3% effective tax rate, in the same period in the prior fiscal year. The primary reason for the difference in the effective tax rates for these periods was the increase in tax-exempt investment income relative to total taxable income in the three months ended June 30, 2007.
     Income tax expense was $9.9 million and $3.9 million, and the effective tax rate was 35.3% and 33.7%, in the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The primary reasons for the difference in the effective tax rates were the retroactive reinstatement of the research and development tax credit during the three months ended December 31, 2006 and the expiration of this credit on December 31, 2007.

14


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources
     Since our inception and prior to our initial public offering, which closed on March 14, 2006, we had financed our operations primarily through cash generated from operations. On October 3, 2006, we closed an additional public offering to sell 2,000,000 shares of common stock, generating net proceeds of $30.9 million. Since the shares were sold on September 27, 2006, the transaction was included in stockholders’ equity and the gross proceeds of $31.2 million was recorded as a receivable from sale of common stock as of September 30, 2006. On October 11, 2006, the underwriters exercised their option to purchase an additional 200,000 shares, generating net proceeds of $3.1 million.
     Our balance in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities increased from $112.5 million as of September 30, 2007 to $113.3 million as of June 30, 2008. Operating activities during the nine months ended June 30, 2008 provided cash of $9.0 million, due to income of $18.1 million resulting primarily from sales of test systems, depreciation and amortization expense of $3.0 million that did not require cash, a $2.4 million increase in accrued expenses due to higher operating levels and a $2.2 million decrease in other current assets resulting primarily from a decrease in prepaid income taxes. These increases in working capital were offset in part by uses of working capital driven by an increase in accounts receivable (net of deferred revenue) of $2.5 million due to increased sales activity, and an increase in inventory of $14.5 million due to additional component purchases, work-in-process, and finished goods to support projected sales activity. Investing activities used cash to purchase capital equipment of $6.5 million, which primarily represented test and computer equipment for use in product and application development.
     We believe our existing cash balance and marketable securities will be adequate to meet our anticipated cash needs for at least the next twelve months. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our rate of revenue growth, the timing and extent of spending to support product development efforts, the expansion of sales and marketing activities, the timing of introductions of new products and enhancements to existing products, the costs to ensure access to adequate manufacturing capacity, and the continuing market acceptance of our products. To the extent that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and any cash from operations are insufficient to fund our future activities, we may need to raise additional funds through bank lines of credit or public or private equity or debt financing. Although we are currently not a party to any agreement or letter of intent with respect to potential investments in, or acquisitions of, complementary businesses, products or technologies, we may enter into these types of arrangements in the future, which could also require us to seek additional equity or debt financing. Additional funds may not be available on terms favorable to us, or at all.
     As of June 30, 2008, the Company had $32.6 million of auction rate securities (ARSs), which are variable rate securities, most of which are AA/AAA rated and collateralized by student loans ($28.9 million at par) or municipal revenues ($5.3 million at par) and are substantially guaranteed by a U.S. Department of Education agency or a third party insurer. The ARSs are typically bought and sold in a Dutch auction process that resets the interest rate through buyers and sellers stipulating the reset interest rate for the par value of the securities. While the underlying securities for the ARSs have a long-term nominal maturity, the Dutch auction process occurs at predetermined intervals of 7 to 35 days. Starting in mid February 2008, the Company experienced difficulties in selling additional ARSs due to the failure of the auction mechanism as a result of sell orders exceeding buy orders for these securities. These failed auctions represent market liquidity risk and not defaults or credit events. Holders of the securities continue to receive interest on the investment, currently at a predetermined maximum rate based on a spread above named market rate indices or a penalty interest rate stipulated in the bond indenture, and the securities will be auctioned every 7 to 35 days until the auction succeeds, the issuer calls the securities or they mature. Based upon a valuation model, which included factors such as type of security, tax status, credit quality, duration, insurance and the portfolio composition as well as observable market data including yield or spreads of trading instruments, we recorded an unrealized loss of $1.5 million as of June 30, 2008 against the par value of $34.2 million of these investments. Our estimate of fair value was based upon information currently available and the underlying nature of the ARSs in light of recent liquidity issues. Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115 (SFAS 115), Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, as well as other related accounting guidance, we considered whether the recent liquidity issues and decline in value is temporary as of June 30, 2008. Accordingly, we recorded the unrealized loss as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. Should the ARSs continue to fail and if the Company requires these funds for operating purposes, we may be required to charge the unrealized and any realized loss on these ARSs to the results of operations in future periods. At this time the Company does not believe that these investments are other than temporarily impaired or that the inability to sell the securities at par value will have a material impact on the Company’s liquidity or financial position. The Company has the intent and ability to hold these ARSs until the recent liquidity issues become resolved, which management believes could take more than 12 months. During July 2008, ARSs of $4.0 million collateralized by student loans were called by the issuers at par. Therefore, those ARSs are classified as current assets as of June 30, 2008. The estimated fair value of the remaining ARSs of approximately $28.6 million are classified as noncurrent assets as of June 30, 2008.

15


Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
     As of June 30, 2008, the Company had total marketable securities of $72.0 million. $39.4 million of the investments are comprised of AA or better-rated variable rate demand notes (VRDNs), which are financial instruments, backed by a letter of credit of major A-rated financial institutions. Interest rates on the VRDNs investments are reset every 7 to 28 days by the financial institution backing the instrument by considering key current short-term indices such as LIBOR or the BMA Index for short-term rates and other investment instrument characteristics with the intent to provide instrument holders with market rate returns. The holders have the option to continue to hold the instrument or require the market maker to purchase the security at par. In addition, VRDNs can be sold at par back to the financial institution backing the instrument within 3 to 5 business days. The remaining $32.6 million represent auction rate securities (ARSs) which are variable rate securities most of which are AA/AAA rated that are collateralized by student loans ($28.9 million at par) or municipal revenues ($5.3 million at par) and are substantially guaranteed by a U.S. Department of Education agency or a third party insurer.
     As of June 30, 2008, we performed an assessment of the fair value of our ARSs using a valuation model which factored in the type of security, tax status, credit quality, duration, insurance and the portfolio composition as well as observable market data including yield or spreads of trading instruments. The valuation of our investment portfolio is subject to uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Factors that may impact its valuation include changes to credit ratings of the securities as well as to the underlying assets supporting those securities, rates of default of the underlying assets, underlying collateral value, discount rates and ongoing strength and quality of market credit and liquidity. As a result, the Company recorded an unrealized loss of $1.3 million during the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008, and an additional $0.2 million in the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 related to certain ARS investments. However, based upon the fact that most of the underlying securities are AA/AAA rated and since the investment continues to pay interest at or above market rates, we believe this decline in value is temporary and as such have recorded this valuation allowance as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. Should the ARSs continue to fail and if the Company requires these funds for operating purposes, management may be required to charge the unrealized and any realized loss to the income statement in future periods. At this time the Company does not believe that our ARS investments are other than temporarily impaired or that the failure of the auction process will have a material impact on the Company’s liquidity or financial position.
     Our revenues and expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars. In addition, our sales contracts are also denominated in U.S. dollars. As a result, we have little exposure to currency exchange risks. We do not currently enter into forward exchange contracts to hedge exposure denominated in foreign currencies or any other derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. In the future, if we feel our foreign currency exposure has increased, we may consider entering into hedging transactions to help mitigate that risk.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
     Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2008. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2008, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of such date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
     No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

16


Table of Contents

Part II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
     Not applicable.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
     Not applicable.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a)   Not applicable.
 
(b)   On March 8, 2006, our registration statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-130521) was declared effective for our initial public offering, pursuant to which we offered and sold 6,130,000 shares of common stock and received net proceeds of approximately $88.7 million. We used these proceeds to repurchase all of our senior subordinated notes and to redeem all outstanding shares of our redeemable preferred stock, and to pay offering related expenses. As of June 30, 2008, we retained approximately $23.6 million of these net proceeds, none of which were used during the three month period ended June 30, 2008. We intend to use the remaining $23.6 million of the net proceeds from our initial public offering for general corporate purposes, including working capital and possible acquisitions and investments. We currently have no agreements or commitments with respect to any acquisitions or investments and we do not currently have any acquisitions or investments planned. Pending specific application of our net proceeds, we plan to invest our net proceeds in government securities and other short-term, investment-grade, marketable securities.
 
(c)   Not applicable

17


Table of Contents

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
     Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
     Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
     Not applicable
Item 6. Exhibits
     The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index immediately preceding the exhibits are filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and such Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.

18


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  EAGLE TEST SYSTEMS, INC.
 
 
Date: July 30, 2008  By:   /s/ Leonard A. Foxman    
    Leonard A. Foxman    
    Chief Executive Officer and President   
 

19


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX
     Listed and indexed below are all Exhibits filed as part of this report.
     
Exhibit No.   Description
 
   
10.1
  Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement between Eagle Test Systems, Inc. and Leonard Foxman dated July 29, 2008.
 
   
10.2
  Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement between Eagle Test Systems, Inc. and Theodore Foxman dated July 29, 2008.
 
   
10.3
  Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement between Eagle Test Systems, Inc. and Steve Hawrysz dated July 29, 2008.
 
   
10.4
  Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement between Eagle Test Systems, Inc. and Jack Weimer dated July 29, 2008.
 
   
31.1
  Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Executive Officer.
 
   
31.2
  Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Financial Officer.
 
   
32.1
  Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

20