UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
NOTICE OF EXEMPT SOLICITATION
1. Name of the Registrant
CME Group, Inc.
2. Name of person relying on exemption
Norges Bank
3. Address of person relying on exemption
Bankplassen 2
P.O. Box 1179 Sentrum
Oslo Q8 0107
4. Written Materials. Attach written material required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-6(g)(1).
1
Proxy Access Proposals
Investor Presentation
March/April 2012
Runa Urheim, Vegard Torsnes
2
Outline
§ Government Pension Fund Global
§ Ownership activities
§ Proxy Access
§ Structure of NBIM’s proposals
§ Selected companies
3
Government Pension Fund Global
4
Source: NBIM
2000 bn. 13 Oct 2008
3000 bn. 19 Oct 2010
1000 bn. Dec 2004
|
Asset class
|
Value
|
Percentage
fund |
|
Equities
|
1 945
|
58.7%
|
|
Fixed Income
|
1 356
|
41.0%
|
|
Real Estate
|
11
|
0.3%
|
The fund’s market value
Billions of kroner, as of 31 December 2011
Billions of kroner, as of 31 December 2011
5
Sources: Ministry of Finance, National Budget 2012 and Norges Bank
Projected fund size
6
Governance structure
Stortinget (Norwegian Parliament)
Ministry of Finance
Norges Bank Executive Board
NBIM
• Government Pension Fund Act
• National Budget
• Annual white paper
• National Accounts
• Mandate
• Quarterly and annual
reports
• Investment strategy
advice
7
Mission and Strategy
To safeguard and build financial
wealth for Norway’s future generations
§ A respected, transparent and responsible manager
8
Source: NBIM
|
Return 2011
|
- 2.5%
|
|
Annualised since 1998
|
4.5%
|
Quarterly and annualised absolute returns
Percent, measured in international currency
Percent, measured in international currency
9
Quarterly and annualised excess return*
Percentage points, measured in international currency
Percentage points, measured in international currency
Source: NBIM
|
Excess return 2011
|
- 0.13%
|
|
Annualised since 1998
|
0.28%
|
*) Excluding real estate
10
Ownership activities
11
Ownership interest in equity markets
Percent of FTSE All Cap Index’s market capitalisation
Percent of FTSE All Cap Index’s market capitalisation
Source: FTSE, NBIM
12
Ownership focus areas
1. Equal treatment of shareholders
2. Shareholder influence and board
accountability
accountability
3. Well-functioning, legitimate and efficient
financial markets
financial markets
4. Climate change management
5. Water management
6. Children’s rights
13
1. Expectation documents
2. Dialogue with companies
3. Voting
4. Shareholder proposals
5. Contact with regulatory authorities
6. Public views
7. Legal action
Ownership tools
14
§ Annual and quarterly reports
§ Holding lists annually
§ Voting records annually
§ Real-time updated market
value on website
value on website
§ www.nbim.no
Transparency
15
Proxy Access
16
Shareholder nomination rights are fundamental
§ Fundamental principle of corporate governance
§ Will increase board accountability
§ The right to nominate is normally delegated to the board
§ It is crucial that shareholder can nominate candidates in special
circumstances
circumstances
§ A successful board should not fear Proxy Access
§ A nominee, regardless of proposer, must always be elected by
the general meeting
the general meeting
§ The general meeting will elect the nominee best suited to serve
the interests of all shareholders
the interests of all shareholders
17
NBIM’s motivations
§ NBIM has 108 bn USD (18%) of its assets in US equities
§ Proxy Access will lower our US investment risk
§ Long term returns depend on good corporate governance
§ Need for better board accountability in companies where
poor performance show an urgency of board changes
poor performance show an urgency of board changes
§ Shareholder proposals necessary in the absense of a
universal rule
universal rule
§ NBIM will continue to pursue a universal rule
18
Structure of NBIM’s proposals
19
Terms
§ Binding by-law changes
§ Enables shareholders to nominate candidates subject to
reasonable limitations
reasonable limitations
§ 1% ownership requirement
§ 1 year holding requirement
§ Max 25% of the board nominated by each nominator
§ Shareholders nominees can constitute max 25% of the board
20
A hypothetical board election
§ Company board has 12 seats
§ Any shareholder may nominate directors up to 25% of the board
seats. With 12 seats, this is a maximum of 3 nominees per
shareholder or shareholder group.
seats. With 12 seats, this is a maximum of 3 nominees per
shareholder or shareholder group.
§ The board nominates 12 candidates
§ Two shareholders or groups nominate 3 candidates each
§ The ballot will include 18 nominees, consisting of the 12
company nominees and the 6 shareholder nominees
company nominees and the 6 shareholder nominees
§ Each shareholder may vote FOR a maximum of 12 candidates
and against as many candidates he wants
and against as many candidates he wants
21
Example Vote Outcomes
§ If one shareholder nominee
receives more votes than the company nominee receiving the fewest votes, then
that shareholder nominee would be elected to the board along with the other 11
company nominees.
that shareholder nominee would be elected to the board along with the other 11
company nominees.
§ If 2 or 3 shareholder nominees
receive more votes than the company nominees receiving the fewest votes, then
those 2 or 3 shareholder nominees would be elected to the board along with the
10 or 9, respectively, company nominees who received greater shareholder
support.
those 2 or 3 shareholder nominees would be elected to the board along with the
10 or 9, respectively, company nominees who received greater shareholder
support.
§ HOWEVER, if 4 or more shareholder nominees
receive more votes than certain of the candidates nominated by the company, the
25% cap is triggered and ONLY the 3 shareholder nominees receiving the
greatest number of votes would be elected to the board. The resulting board,
therefore, would consist of the 3 shareholder nominated candidates who received
the greatest number of votes and the 9 company nominated candidates who
received the greatest number of votes.
25% cap is triggered and ONLY the 3 shareholder nominees receiving the
greatest number of votes would be elected to the board. The resulting board,
therefore, would consist of the 3 shareholder nominated candidates who received
the greatest number of votes and the 9 company nominated candidates who
received the greatest number of votes.
22
Selected companies
23
Wells Fargo
§ The Board has circumvented a shareholder proposal
§ The Board implemented a 25% capital requirement to call an EGM, in contradiction
to a 2011 shareholder proposal with a 10% threshold
to a 2011 shareholder proposal with a 10% threshold
§ The Board may amend bylaws without shareholder approval
§ A shareholder proposed amendment needs support of 50% of outstanding shares
§ The Board has authority to issue new preferred stock
§ Can potentially be used as a takeover defense
§ Combined roles of CEO and Chairman
§ Wells Fargo has failed to explain the re-nomination of directors
receiving relatively low shareholder support over several years
receiving relatively low shareholder support over several years
§ Directors should be assessed on how they have served shareholders across all
boards where they have been entrusted with a board seat
boards where they have been entrusted with a board seat
§ Low shareholder support expresses shareholder concerns on board accountability,
independence and transparency
independence and transparency
24
Staples
§ Board has circumvented shareholder proposals
§ Implemented a 25% capital requirement to call an EGM, in contradiction to a 2008
proposal with a 10% threshold receiving support of 67% of votes cast
proposal with a 10% threshold receiving support of 67% of votes cast
§ Despite majority support on written consent shareholder proposals in 2010 & 2011,
the Board has not implemented such right
the Board has not implemented such right
§ The Board may amend bylaws without shareholder
approval
approval
§ A shareholder proposed amendment needs support of 50% of outstanding shares
§ The Board has authority to issue new preferred stock
§ Can potentially be used as a takeover defense
§ Combined roles of CEO and Chairman
§ Staples currently is seeking to exclude NBIM’s proposal
25
Staples
§ Total share return inferior to peer group
§ As defined by Staples for executive compensation
Source: Factset
26
Western Union
§ Classified Board
§ Western Union has recently proposed declassification
§ Shareholders cannot convene an EGM
§ Shareholders cannot act by written consent
§ The Board may amend bylaws without shareholder
approval
approval
§ A shareholder proposed amendment needs support of 50% of outstanding
shares
shares
§ The Board has authority to issue new preferred stock
§ Can potentially be used as a takeover defense
§ In January 2012, the Company stated that the Board would
submit its own proxy access proposal for consideration by
shareholders, but has since changed its mind.
submit its own proxy access proposal for consideration by
shareholders, but has since changed its mind.
27
Western Union
§ Total share return inferior to peer group
§ As defined by Western Union for executive compensation
Source: Factset
28
CME Group
§ Plurality voting standard for board elections
§ Classified Board
§ CME Group has recently proposed declassification
§ Large board with 32 directors
§ Several directors guaranteed re-nomination
§ Multiple share classes
§ Some with special board election rights
§ The Board has authority to issue new preferred stock
§ Can potentially be used as a takeover defense
§ Shareholders cannot convene an EGM
§ Shareholders cannot act by written consent
§ The Board may amend bylaws without shareholder approval
§ A shareholder proposed amendment needs support of 2/3 of outstanding shares
29
CME Group
§ Total share return inferior to peer group
§ As defined by CME Group for executive compensation
Source: Factset
30
Charles Schwab
§ Shareholders cannot convene an EGM
§ Shareholders cannot act by written consent
§ Classified Board
§ A 2011 shareholder proposal to declassify received 69 % support
§ Charles Schwab has recently proposed declassification
§ The Board may amend bylaws without shareholder
approval
approval
§ A shareholder proposed amendment needs support of 80% of outstanding shares
§ The Board has authority to issue new preferred stock
§ Can potentially be used as a takeover defense
31
Please do not send your proxy card to NBIM but return it to
the proxy-voting agent in the envelope that was or will be
provided to you by the respective company. NBIM is not able
to vote your proxies, nor does this communication
contemplate such an event. This communication is meant to
inform you about NBIM's proposals and to give you valuable
decision-making information when you review your
shareholder proxy for each of the 2012 annual meetings for
Wells Fargo & Company, Charles Schwab Corporation,
Western Union Company, CME Group, Inc., and Staples, Inc.
the proxy-voting agent in the envelope that was or will be
provided to you by the respective company. NBIM is not able
to vote your proxies, nor does this communication
contemplate such an event. This communication is meant to
inform you about NBIM's proposals and to give you valuable
decision-making information when you review your
shareholder proxy for each of the 2012 annual meetings for
Wells Fargo & Company, Charles Schwab Corporation,
Western Union Company, CME Group, Inc., and Staples, Inc.
Disclaimer
32